{"meta":{"query_hash":"bbb2ea18f736","filters":{"topic":"Legal principles and applications"},"cohort_total":2078,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":2078,"exported":2078,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bbb2ea18f736","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+principles+and+applications"},"results":[{"id":"W101537623","doi":"","title":"Policing Contracts for Unconscionability: Guidelines for International Arbitrators Subject to the Scrutiny of US Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Statutory law; Scrutiny; Law; Political science; Statute; Common law; Doctrine; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.04270746682536422,"score_gpt":0.40025637272752645,"score_spread":0.35754890590216226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101537623","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010517375,0.04043886,0.20024955,0.41854417,0.0034052262,0.0015535598,0.000113794646,0.0010958631,0.3240816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33429044,0.036550675,0.41505107,0.108691305,0.0055881855,0.0035835893,0.00023632954,0.0010715255,0.09493684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92475784,0.042998686,0.008674264,0.0036833116,0.015197102,0.0046887905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9190455,0.056040164,0.004252913,0.0035502878,0.014642648,0.0024684728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.102791876,0.00164603,0.0020871805,0.0062580737,0.017671974,0.03433156,0.0069766114,0.037067175,0.004984336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111535154,0.0017738146,0.002178275,0.0041381223,0.03311327,0.026096994,0.013790188,0.021536564,0.0027009784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012175021,0.00005444479,0.000818893,0.00017703262,0.000016217986,0.0006071858,0.020816395,0.0009627139,0.0003122233,0.85055405,0.06930717,0.056361593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003320216,0.000041731266,0.0007290507,0.0026339546,0.000047121826,0.00061441783,0.013284481,0.0021389057,0.00040967244,0.45483297,0.5251034,0.00013095317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027764585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03598812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102791876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009178616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04166657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5436219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W101999146","doi":"","title":"HMRC v Weald Leasing Ltd. Not only artifical: the abuse of law test in VAT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; Payment; Test (biology); Law; Element (criminal law); Revenue; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.06574689821180192,"score_gpt":0.30084486726051524,"score_spread":0.23509796904871333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101999146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006777375,0.003791746,0.0010806789,0.869528,0.0047132815,0.00006254403,0.0002120378,0.00012321695,0.113711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061794825,0.0011070448,0.0006595284,0.8566831,0.0032209605,0.00009765271,0.00005718801,0.00009470821,0.076285124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98811406,0.002986902,0.0011751787,0.0016391209,0.0034053505,0.0026793317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97006625,0.024143757,0.0010095506,0.0006145609,0.0032597352,0.00090621633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012692324,0.0008475234,0.0012477034,0.0009846982,0.01135165,0.009074058,0.0037566698,0.06753519,0.011174922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039815053,0.0015478551,0.0015394437,0.001367966,0.010581421,0.0080961,0.0032764284,0.031851046,0.0037289239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006989411,0.000034879617,0.0008774268,0.00009586614,0.000016989437,0.0011453892,0.004561054,0.00014852782,0.00037796347,0.2731246,0.71382254,0.0057248166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011689141,0.00010887157,0.0034083957,0.00069437566,0.000064959306,0.0009917166,0.007044739,0.00056648976,0.0017394889,0.037894294,0.9471014,0.00026826997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12956455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20753069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12956455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008562471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009064656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2576208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1033596391","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511778711.001","title":"Preface","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.030990166749577854,"score_gpt":0.24232276970566877,"score_spread":0.2113326029560909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1033596391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005067014,0.005082479,0.0012727301,0.010147012,0.024054134,0.00015993943,0.0023447138,0.00033852202,0.9560938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002495082,0.002941978,0.00067693123,0.0024653457,0.002751058,0.000072584124,0.0016919496,0.00020040738,0.9867047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950767,0.00006803878,0.000029767287,0.000076524324,0.00026365177,0.000054292184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986469,0.00028099318,0.000056079563,0.00012396727,0.0006972207,0.0001948422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066936965,0.00062373007,0.00051241834,0.0020826794,0.0024399909,0.0030599353,0.0010543334,0.0015017291,0.40585166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003657552,0.00031373187,0.00039300945,0.0019313471,0.0007019209,0.002865616,0.0016328519,0.0031120116,0.21096146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000973563,0.000014649572,0.00005260151,0.00006888978,6.196991e-7,0.000040921273,0.000138201,0.00003458213,0.00007556205,0.013568296,0.9530721,0.032923914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.3617283e-7,0.000003917115,0.00008875026,0.0000594132,2.9259974e-7,0.000029585606,0.000059346035,0.000009512732,0.000020292357,0.0014987295,0.9982279,0.000001338408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049786023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007420347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40585166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00199342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017864149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103413524","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1507","title":"\"Are We There Yet?\": Towards a New Rule for Choice of Law in Tort","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Tort; Law; Relevance (law); Rule of law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Duty; Legal certainty; Political science; Choice of law; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; Conflict of laws; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.0728043420248603,"score_gpt":0.3592577814092565,"score_spread":0.2864534393843962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W103413524","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036308944,0.008976815,0.5072298,0.24925213,0.0034406793,0.0003182979,0.00023423485,0.00015039086,0.19408874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7693129,0.0035843917,0.17098796,0.03632433,0.0030253662,0.0005523001,0.00011742685,0.00012091637,0.01597439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98374534,0.00789493,0.0009333069,0.0025299168,0.004028321,0.0008682312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98410046,0.011045413,0.001111835,0.0012602845,0.001986928,0.00049518107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026307639,0.00047773228,0.0010775651,0.0016569085,0.0054695806,0.009547578,0.0030684539,0.010672687,0.0020861765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038725372,0.0006477537,0.0012784554,0.0011208176,0.040954597,0.0183547,0.004663648,0.016895086,0.00076160626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039927686,0.000004209305,0.000065087486,0.0000087660865,0.0000016201903,0.000014727044,0.00040875797,0.00011314647,0.000021166492,0.99649566,0.00089924654,0.001963723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072330336,0.000006546721,0.00006232432,0.000041730586,0.0000029153002,0.000023258799,0.00013580285,0.00059375534,0.000047871326,0.99049735,0.008570731,0.0000105178315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005411816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004943304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026307639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00483245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007404721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13912976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109702861","doi":"","title":"Good Faith and Wrongful Dismissal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Obligation; Bad faith; Compensation (psychology); Damages; Faith; Argument (complex analysis); Good faith; Tort; Law; Unfair dismissal; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01412940399215915,"score_gpt":0.26559655642047997,"score_spread":0.2514671524283208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109702861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1454778,0.0059761773,0.016219854,0.12535235,0.0014767705,0.00014315404,0.00015242476,0.00009142001,0.70511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9343691,0.0006663349,0.00080236554,0.033950653,0.0003501617,0.000085171705,0.000025646646,0.00002340594,0.029727096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899858,0.003365309,0.00049817626,0.0011138428,0.0025088042,0.0025281329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388313,0.0037290647,0.0006797815,0.00058398704,0.00067954557,0.000444368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007828683,0.00048068765,0.00064492295,0.0010817287,0.011353608,0.0075469986,0.001510602,0.019547809,0.004354949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023289029,0.0006657166,0.0008492154,0.0007696167,0.026709259,0.0067820484,0.0077241566,0.016867815,0.0007317679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021700671,0.000022513237,0.0010342854,0.000020356636,0.0000114351005,0.00061076495,0.004955975,0.00011867745,0.00013939256,0.98096645,0.008310226,0.0037882158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091335445,0.00012391602,0.0040266453,0.00044056826,0.00005130827,0.0015670436,0.007933863,0.0007712328,0.001187242,0.8001964,0.18347311,0.00013734186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020124642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025003873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020124642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004147717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036964319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04140252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1143643400","doi":"","title":"Title Registration and the Abolition of Notice in British Columbia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Statute; Doctrine; Appeal; Law; Equity (law); Political science; Security interest; Legislature; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.011252179233131952,"score_gpt":0.2574278891782304,"score_spread":0.24617570994509844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1143643400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5048948,0.00560666,0.0041655763,0.038066432,0.00048236028,0.00037756687,0.00063752214,0.00026961596,0.44549957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85939246,0.002103013,0.0025476555,0.011057381,0.00006701468,0.000080611186,0.00024268735,0.00006376845,0.1244454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913483,0.00086351595,0.00048220935,0.0008513218,0.0036421558,0.0028125509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877966,0.0040486385,0.001147919,0.000687008,0.005046359,0.0012735197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004692271,0.00021462237,0.00037785093,0.0027836582,0.015620374,0.01037806,0.0028754098,0.0042665442,0.0045344653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016805332,0.00086530426,0.00033959403,0.003585282,0.009603178,0.002159026,0.003592515,0.0057280846,0.000330467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001990371,0.00019736693,0.044724386,0.00031734546,0.00006246195,0.003238616,0.024861932,0.0048664603,0.005324658,0.7467367,0.045300428,0.124170564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012602354,0.00020769668,0.12801091,0.00087780197,0.00021490444,0.0007045498,0.02171982,0.005209827,0.00497999,0.03573245,0.80160475,0.0006112834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98067605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11857058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11857058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14607291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8602938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116281993","doi":"","title":"Personal property security law reform in England and Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Personal property; Law; Security interest; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08610741597746681,"score_gpt":0.28375678893163697,"score_spread":0.19764937295417018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116281993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52107066,0.0128765395,0.0005237492,0.2161338,0.0010804563,0.00026019762,0.0025146147,0.00014104343,0.2453989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81026626,0.0036147602,0.00043678758,0.02160008,0.00018970159,0.0001098471,0.00049579464,0.000074020114,0.16321278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818633,0.0010901821,0.0006425778,0.0012191838,0.0047868895,0.0103979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98087907,0.0032564192,0.00086199545,0.0006022914,0.007092948,0.0073072724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004583331,0.00038359995,0.0014565984,0.0034509904,0.03167308,0.01946196,0.0047970763,0.0109325675,0.016751865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024308618,0.0010357669,0.0011283606,0.007102509,0.008802235,0.003366838,0.006600315,0.01167748,0.00077112933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005424221,0.00031796057,0.038650673,0.00050565694,0.00021188821,0.0023227655,0.035569083,0.0035536292,0.00074249675,0.71708184,0.14744155,0.05305998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004035153,0.00020316876,0.21002764,0.0011203414,0.00034634248,0.00045476173,0.059756786,0.0024904907,0.0008886802,0.022669245,0.7012286,0.00041041986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31002104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31002104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41136986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8002778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W117114211","doi":"","title":"Setting aside default judgment - whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered - service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) - requirements for affadavit of service","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aside; Service (business); Business; Law; Management; Engineering; Political science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.11132254642257207,"score_gpt":0.36732972055023766,"score_spread":0.2560071741276656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117114211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0727211,0.0010040182,0.031047897,0.061681554,0.0020901323,0.00110685,0.0016816802,0.00070921844,0.82795745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73945934,0.00043038814,0.018997239,0.07462123,0.0012082903,0.00093452644,0.00060067663,0.00016716287,0.16358109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97563744,0.0059631774,0.0030408986,0.0033974992,0.008404817,0.003556181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818541,0.009624647,0.000821593,0.0017909252,0.0051820828,0.00072667416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020239405,0.0004448029,0.00091616355,0.001057206,0.007302657,0.008466613,0.0027202764,0.016545167,0.00904424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052415542,0.000783032,0.0011324509,0.0008801591,0.006018194,0.0048941183,0.002954742,0.012686725,0.0051789437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007598187,0.00009165251,0.0028778997,0.00006098565,0.000016329192,0.00068100716,0.0037260426,0.00018868643,0.0013189148,0.88813025,0.091177605,0.0116546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024431426,0.0005445247,0.014077117,0.00070857647,0.00014656647,0.0017739915,0.006257655,0.0052713733,0.0066377497,0.440282,0.5236446,0.00041152452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035219617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08030137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035219617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048129056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014193393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107037425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120017687","doi":"","title":"A Comment on \"No Comment\": The Sub Judice Rule and the Accountability of Public Officials in the 21st Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Rule of law; Convention; Law; Statutory law; Humanities; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.02858295979937917,"score_gpt":0.2898832402703352,"score_spread":0.261300280470956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120017687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027242252,0.0012124329,0.0023607893,0.91670984,0.021987252,0.000028147182,0.00007706648,0.00008793071,0.054812398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08693919,0.0008504387,0.0014801732,0.84395796,0.012256407,0.0001147302,0.000040574327,0.00017178195,0.054188773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97942364,0.010352063,0.0009293481,0.003051202,0.004308307,0.0019354163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9382945,0.04562544,0.0028962435,0.0027620234,0.008640935,0.001780917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019400444,0.00062842784,0.0006972459,0.0009983866,0.014850166,0.008663802,0.0036379495,0.034702618,0.009058465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081737146,0.00048049915,0.0009732512,0.0008611935,0.022708045,0.009323066,0.005801058,0.03299843,0.0031237553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000412519,0.000015745924,0.0005158955,0.00007612427,0.000011250088,0.00046895206,0.007842849,0.000082369406,0.0002720121,0.3974009,0.58712703,0.006145646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024952898,0.000037618618,0.0009877664,0.0004621597,0.000027797361,0.00023463366,0.00621718,0.00044702852,0.00083343557,0.10977023,0.880847,0.00011025212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020342514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019027842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034702618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006449807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010661898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102600574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W13259318","doi":"","title":"A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE IN CONTRACT LAW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of allergy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Rigour; Commission; Common law; Law and economics; Political science; Unconscionability; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09056264957926108,"score_gpt":0.4188014815222654,"score_spread":0.3282388319430043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13259318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011606954,0.056991044,0.04400944,0.7166318,0.020513983,0.0007760187,0.00015031283,0.00006209754,0.1492583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5751875,0.03307957,0.039668426,0.2866098,0.03637103,0.0015237228,0.00010891005,0.00014318619,0.02730774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9253368,0.04544945,0.003688117,0.0042584143,0.018906143,0.0023611514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77827007,0.19670825,0.0044617034,0.0036804245,0.015701545,0.0011779319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08410316,0.00070180546,0.0012427162,0.0048728203,0.009631587,0.015513564,0.0039186785,0.021915238,0.0019687198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16689712,0.00084220007,0.0015257274,0.00302263,0.058596667,0.017090356,0.0034165338,0.02729227,0.0007118301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019089412,0.000007065663,0.00010159899,0.00017178702,0.000005039326,0.0002519328,0.0025832446,0.00021245886,0.000057232774,0.97482693,0.016392503,0.005371141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003956924,0.00006888236,0.0005686617,0.002493719,0.000022424207,0.00029568817,0.0046160584,0.001315778,0.00037754048,0.7261274,0.26397943,0.00009473827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013209812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012801644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08410316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017486457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01923094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44478536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134763176","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.023","title":"The trust and its civilian analogues","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03139921788172029,"score_gpt":0.23116824693522406,"score_spread":0.19976902905350377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134763176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006655628,0.003963643,0.011522718,0.008313447,0.00043423576,0.000017341756,0.00008691576,0.000034020537,0.96897215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7592555,0.0042008795,0.00534618,0.0015548823,0.0010281418,0.00012850927,0.00007643898,0.00009224539,0.22831725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986425,0.00059325213,0.000069804555,0.00020213492,0.00031685102,0.00017541533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977869,0.0010904204,0.00021401486,0.00048363578,0.00028387696,0.00014118524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018084963,0.00038462228,0.0005823317,0.0011771686,0.0030000042,0.008796134,0.00086587947,0.0033226665,0.018623449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064777774,0.00038770022,0.0003580794,0.0020412675,0.023134017,0.008991018,0.0024063473,0.0050206757,0.0022568034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6957425e-7,9.227783e-7,0.0000032374608,0.0000019335816,2.0608788e-7,0.0000028005652,0.000065214685,0.000022805085,0.0000019723352,0.99889165,0.000504027,0.00050430326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040263712,0.000002129606,0.000024155715,0.000013886007,9.2956043e-7,0.000014201145,0.00007800625,0.00016942792,0.000011122968,0.97774714,0.021932682,0.0000023384596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009042771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006374198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018623449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056025027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026877695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062301636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W137645581","doi":"","title":"เลสเบยน, ชนชน และพนทชวต: ขอพจารณาบางประการวาดวยประวตศาสตรของพนทผานชวตของ แอน ลสเตอร","year":2012,"lang":"th","type":"article","venue":"วารสารศิลปศาสตร์ (Journal of Liberal Arts)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Gentry; Public sphere; Space (punctuation); Subject (documents); Sociology; Private space; Public life; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.060603898744134514,"score_gpt":0.3523361562872019,"score_spread":0.29173225754306736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W137645581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039004896,0.004323562,0.007167015,0.052448,0.0013208699,0.00007016439,0.000111050955,0.000066902816,0.8954876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69497013,0.002155608,0.0035026649,0.0064386767,0.0004201901,0.00010206836,0.00007186374,0.000079346115,0.29225942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827886,0.00069671177,0.000057177753,0.00028618416,0.0003646078,0.00031654662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894625,0.00030656322,0.00013383894,0.00009141736,0.0003417632,0.00018014756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021741085,0.0003319979,0.00021709107,0.00077746896,0.0068650194,0.009089833,0.0005877082,0.0023555805,0.014441167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003589553,0.00021663823,0.0002235587,0.0006867092,0.018485446,0.004816872,0.0026717023,0.0030468134,0.0036263152],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016799624,0.000014780696,0.00085596665,0.000034950637,0.0000040494665,0.00018198285,0.027679378,0.00006312733,0.0002519426,0.9402395,0.018133352,0.012524115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010807062,0.000029447747,0.001696225,0.00015322135,0.000010218113,0.00034615083,0.026654487,0.0001777792,0.00063840346,0.15334556,0.81691265,0.000025174377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012253111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014267864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014441167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005735748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004430891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04831052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1446773695","doi":"","title":"Common Law Property Theory and Jurisprudence in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Expropriation; Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Property law; Sociology; Land law; Epistemology; Land tenure; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.024915734848097188,"score_gpt":0.2848853378712027,"score_spread":0.2599696030231055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1446773695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05565558,0.01342891,0.010850335,0.08940542,0.00048411987,0.00010329328,0.00029158444,0.000085447224,0.82969534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9135092,0.004835775,0.003596303,0.008901029,0.00013819776,0.000056076286,0.00008873864,0.00005246291,0.06882221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923839,0.001158827,0.00020837042,0.0010219972,0.0032485742,0.0019784686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950648,0.0019769052,0.0002248979,0.00020692302,0.0019190391,0.0006074589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044562505,0.0003236487,0.000760994,0.0026217988,0.023058275,0.010905526,0.002563497,0.004968474,0.007844695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010840014,0.000473452,0.0005939331,0.004193788,0.032120217,0.0041381773,0.0044696378,0.006283849,0.00038723866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003075387,0.0000059148233,0.00029079968,0.00001476459,0.000002941596,0.00006245115,0.0013924495,0.00022330027,0.000027698024,0.9915074,0.0030865276,0.003382602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041178424,0.000022931881,0.0068891076,0.00042351484,0.00003821111,0.00013483987,0.005212838,0.0040692626,0.00028245526,0.6321645,0.3506164,0.00010485097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97811663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9753352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16587037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16587037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15249404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96747214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1455151012","doi":"10.5902/198136947040","title":"JUSTINIANO I, LEGISLADOR","year":2009,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.04153086519473773,"score_gpt":0.35895844010769395,"score_spread":0.3174275749129562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1455151012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016802281,0.0071865846,0.00493053,0.02752595,0.0018599278,0.000055925422,0.00015930577,0.00011837177,0.94136107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5363319,0.005235965,0.0038706535,0.012022276,0.0013482043,0.0002327829,0.00025970346,0.00027111772,0.44042745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967327,0.0009196067,0.0001413904,0.0007572227,0.0009942694,0.0004548404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982016,0.00094719767,0.00023034876,0.00014989922,0.00027655112,0.00019439701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024757194,0.00034420533,0.00034638832,0.0014598131,0.006465413,0.005674534,0.0008680467,0.002808148,0.013687418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076184515,0.00030474752,0.00022101523,0.0016787675,0.0069413823,0.0045363037,0.0030225138,0.004326992,0.0022949697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013159766,0.000008082854,0.0005899987,0.0000760436,0.0000026224523,0.00010982805,0.01246627,0.00005384724,0.00034773108,0.93225163,0.036735605,0.017345207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037077602,0.000013170789,0.0010495447,0.00016393072,0.0000039332244,0.00008957913,0.0027513658,0.00007825542,0.000313888,0.026085913,0.9694308,0.00001590785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012977287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025904449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013687418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033018808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004181529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045789003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1458225820","doi":"10.32920/22229320","title":"Austin’s Complementary Jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal positivism; Perspective (graphical); Positivism; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.0832755735722623,"score_gpt":0.41832230817800553,"score_spread":0.33504673460574325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1458225820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009474366,0.0047933413,0.02772893,0.07917719,0.0020849013,0.00007371856,0.00012806548,0.000085597516,0.87645394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7655765,0.0057337764,0.036846757,0.036186144,0.00452656,0.00091368594,0.00017354643,0.0001779,0.14986509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882013,0.0052712657,0.00038269316,0.001959234,0.0033854204,0.0007999969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939593,0.003679798,0.00032780058,0.000686011,0.00088919705,0.00045791242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005935347,0.0007820723,0.0009582415,0.0032890053,0.010857273,0.011289283,0.0014366761,0.0066467747,0.00741018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007447639,0.0005993787,0.0010338456,0.0020882017,0.038737454,0.0064433534,0.008264845,0.008266823,0.0011617629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024135416,0.0000029801101,0.000021251739,0.00000814683,0.0000010687957,0.000015695985,0.000474048,0.00003240735,0.0000139368985,0.9955701,0.002663261,0.0011947135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014474309,0.000016396649,0.0001749009,0.00010689317,0.0000070325923,0.00011112183,0.0006395242,0.00031089978,0.00008979829,0.772449,0.22606635,0.000013494924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056497115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00565412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011289283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007253494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071661905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05262804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145886080","doi":"10.29173/alr270","title":"How Goes the Battle? An Exploration of Guardianship Reform","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Legislation; Battle; Law; Political science; Order (exchange); Business; History","score_opus":0.12093026285391588,"score_gpt":0.3666589734278373,"score_spread":0.24572871057392143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145886080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40654778,0.026370574,0.0030196996,0.29387686,0.0005582421,0.00012622139,0.0001349805,0.000041925457,0.26932365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96661234,0.005177853,0.00047265852,0.013311423,0.00011230565,0.000031119158,0.000028735923,0.000014844159,0.014238745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98766404,0.0054459493,0.0002581666,0.0009240317,0.0017914556,0.003916309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99075234,0.0046948185,0.0010396781,0.00046198285,0.0020011272,0.0010500111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011101642,0.00018771186,0.00062199513,0.002379039,0.011759764,0.010039115,0.0024565295,0.0038275858,0.0052063516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020340856,0.00034550295,0.00037748693,0.0049709193,0.027763851,0.005655595,0.0046303,0.0070027574,0.00036248658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024914712,0.000070324284,0.0059065064,0.00010200662,0.000015809064,0.00029636556,0.026122201,0.00056265254,0.00023196671,0.9263334,0.006687599,0.033646204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007437166,0.00015873203,0.07289989,0.0011493315,0.00007719878,0.0002016146,0.17562175,0.0009951573,0.001221132,0.17920257,0.56827253,0.0001257445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55927205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6387635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55927205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07918574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09915716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.886647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481842717","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2990","title":"Take My Advice—I Am Not Following It: Ad Hominem Arguments as Legitimate Rebuttals to Appeals to Authority","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Advice (programming); Action (physics); Epistemology; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03376758596611559,"score_gpt":0.35899716338040316,"score_spread":0.3252295774142876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481842717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015644114,0.0062828446,0.076280944,0.6556482,0.0068302276,0.000054220054,0.00007947472,0.0002675067,0.23891252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.725117,0.003340391,0.04431549,0.13924347,0.008417073,0.00016298988,0.000084253516,0.0004293251,0.07888989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919566,0.0043733437,0.0002822858,0.0012616339,0.0017249624,0.00040119217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98177505,0.009960161,0.001569201,0.0022126134,0.0033895404,0.0010934894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008459099,0.00044572246,0.00065920677,0.0012885794,0.005060608,0.00820684,0.0018947005,0.008115933,0.009312471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03610192,0.00025903943,0.00059438363,0.000788867,0.02368033,0.015280387,0.005456086,0.010276849,0.003198966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014356349,0.000010956549,0.00035308098,0.00003703627,0.000010402944,0.00009022617,0.0025134177,0.00008361077,0.00008181059,0.96676606,0.023487434,0.006551664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014721137,0.000012812151,0.00017061604,0.00013728406,0.000009077624,0.000121015706,0.0014371382,0.0005149957,0.00023390453,0.8743294,0.123000994,0.000018079629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003169481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003334157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009312471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003151673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002198762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044736564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482300516","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199829699.003.0008","title":"Fiduciary Duties and Responsibilities of Portfolio Managers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Beneficiary; Discretion; Corporation; Principal (computer security); Business; Portfolio; Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Actuarial science; Economics; Political science; Finance; Duty","score_opus":0.027073193924541574,"score_gpt":0.2774043993446329,"score_spread":0.25033120542009135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482300516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03597375,0.005445459,0.028890327,0.009612667,0.00039153904,0.00009423474,0.000067722336,0.00019216682,0.919332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6833251,0.0033226495,0.017582424,0.0021486566,0.0003224708,0.00018610533,0.00008421241,0.000096642856,0.29293165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965229,0.0016090793,0.00018700382,0.0003483074,0.0008895719,0.00044321292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976265,0.0007533061,0.00029433428,0.00032341838,0.00044245322,0.0005600039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004531599,0.00033870488,0.00019376184,0.0010331485,0.002543101,0.0070931804,0.0009387123,0.0013019757,0.0077796457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062677367,0.00044119128,0.00014446305,0.000714888,0.0042770263,0.0030240945,0.0024791865,0.0025726538,0.0024811635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114821905,0.000022819931,0.00093734433,0.00001773326,0.000001704915,0.000058150825,0.0039116596,0.00017876578,0.00038312623,0.94537944,0.009770451,0.039327346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016132284,0.00004824117,0.0030290948,0.0003832618,0.000007663336,0.00050530455,0.0033036333,0.0018128548,0.0011847081,0.39515293,0.59452426,0.00003190238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030765294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039599505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077796457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035207726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049520466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026025534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484820628","doi":"","title":"Family Law as Fundamental Private Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Family law; Public law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Comparative law; Charter; Jurisdiction; Law reform; Commercial law; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014807945534233646,"score_gpt":0.3171561762931404,"score_spread":0.30234823075890677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484820628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025379252,0.009419002,0.03652719,0.062478516,0.0004230411,0.000075599324,0.0002300129,0.000092617134,0.86537474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464983,0.003303882,0.0061037764,0.0062760157,0.00032526426,0.00006872674,0.00008004592,0.000027866854,0.03731603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962358,0.0010719901,0.00007305414,0.0005782214,0.0011642771,0.0008766518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982352,0.0006310147,0.00015055515,0.00027072857,0.00042429863,0.00028817533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035831495,0.00024286717,0.00035244317,0.0009048988,0.0061098416,0.005964285,0.0011837431,0.0035339633,0.0043472727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046087997,0.00020787814,0.00034571896,0.0009599636,0.038204048,0.0054203225,0.0029661916,0.0038907141,0.000426834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.1251198e-7,8.4201406e-7,0.000022796181,0.000002496564,2.4601204e-7,0.0000074610734,0.00031664173,0.00002812897,0.000008193738,0.9983474,0.0005000799,0.00076533563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047602452,0.0000059263907,0.00035552715,0.000039973336,0.0000023645177,0.00005789181,0.00045376617,0.00024180229,0.000052059986,0.9155952,0.0831852,0.0000055670366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21231775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15680914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21231775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019913208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025045093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4221639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484910822","doi":"","title":"The Role of Trusts in the 'PPSA'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Personal property; Creditor; Business; Voting trust; Law and economics; Obligation; Settlor; Scope (computer science); Trust law; Property (philosophy); Legislation; Constructive trust; Express trust; Constructive; Uniform Commercial Code; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance; Politics; Debt","score_opus":0.015356535900820777,"score_gpt":0.2741355038283506,"score_spread":0.25877896792752986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484910822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17787589,0.0032163796,0.033885922,0.0867682,0.00041693638,0.00010138476,0.00006973956,0.00010013547,0.6975653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784136,0.00037527314,0.0010943867,0.0015157951,0.00007916394,0.000028215143,0.000007329078,0.000011937795,0.018474199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880652,0.0052514533,0.00048269663,0.0010896275,0.003306622,0.0018044799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833866,0.007917501,0.0022579222,0.0020124507,0.0025176513,0.0019078975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010990461,0.00018264817,0.00045630307,0.0010009048,0.008644105,0.009039228,0.0011417326,0.0044282037,0.0043421714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019743333,0.00044627156,0.0005033015,0.00096082967,0.030829517,0.009286429,0.0058958484,0.0061667557,0.00048067118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038677413,0.0000046538594,0.00049298187,0.000008919391,0.000002480224,0.00008192613,0.0043487744,0.000046742512,0.000043961772,0.9919883,0.0008402911,0.0021371383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024713196,0.000087073946,0.006145122,0.00026467472,0.000042052874,0.000554704,0.0073173284,0.0021065567,0.00045571348,0.8106161,0.17233127,0.000054752178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03858552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030034157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03858552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011422134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010314052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0828737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486161712","doi":"","title":"Who Lost What? Relationship and Relational Loss","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.03201317785753765,"score_gpt":0.28508991690490376,"score_spread":0.2530767390473661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486161712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1427574,0.018896764,0.02335671,0.34992898,0.0015529359,0.00011817848,0.000096841955,0.00006668926,0.46322554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96716046,0.0047763465,0.0009158894,0.011434003,0.0003585734,0.00005282203,0.000026174099,0.000023963517,0.0152518805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994451,0.0030602058,0.00014583018,0.00051532197,0.00078745256,0.0010402525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974739,0.0009837463,0.00047190397,0.00015336099,0.0003345705,0.00058237446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005262477,0.00029707432,0.00041127214,0.0014081629,0.008803666,0.008268259,0.0014909024,0.0039172284,0.0053230254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087877605,0.00019630259,0.0003292032,0.0012334636,0.04131441,0.015164852,0.010510712,0.006435126,0.000614943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024837089,0.000055642286,0.0034282655,0.000052839496,0.00001022057,0.00088915986,0.11253014,0.00010763417,0.00011895171,0.8560062,0.007974245,0.018801805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001636104,0.000063292704,0.0035371408,0.00037474462,0.000021191849,0.002427831,0.37475666,0.0005374018,0.00025625702,0.42734075,0.19062397,0.00004451274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020806588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014881617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020806588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00787392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004123126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057129562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486627762","doi":"","title":"Négligence et obligation de diligence: 40 ans d'évolution (Negligence and The Duty of Care: 40 years of Evolution)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Diligence; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.006478463651571309,"score_gpt":0.2683805545381165,"score_spread":0.2619020908865452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486627762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15179266,0.21079707,0.014881063,0.16940321,0.0021187551,0.0001050446,0.00028714546,0.000055267683,0.45055985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85736585,0.061621163,0.0048147966,0.01123882,0.0009914895,0.00008135168,0.000096566524,0.0000671912,0.06372282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958692,0.0014397679,0.00015858703,0.00054666284,0.001296678,0.0006890441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995583,0.0018950821,0.0004343891,0.00028963128,0.0011609194,0.0006369634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047413707,0.00036310463,0.00039034573,0.0023300934,0.0041284948,0.008888129,0.00092615664,0.0031855453,0.0033837736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066572353,0.0003392161,0.00034428178,0.0027594902,0.042790055,0.008461975,0.0043284823,0.0051561655,0.0003091478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017057186,0.00001610884,0.0017045615,0.00006802207,0.000005342798,0.00012084545,0.028384702,0.00028460298,0.000121915386,0.93380016,0.004139419,0.03133714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001001375,0.00005261893,0.020987982,0.0015606637,0.000016212369,0.00034312668,0.025090482,0.0007237536,0.00027657647,0.3893917,0.5614445,0.00010232383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40789783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39036775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40789783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04005295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023492461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8110472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489398868","doi":"10.21991/c94t1v","title":"“Irreconcilable? The Duty to Consult and Administrative Decision Makers”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Duty; Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Formative assessment; Relation (database); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03535903856437894,"score_gpt":0.32172282689042964,"score_spread":0.2863637883260507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489398868","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020589026,0.00558515,0.009902445,0.5794015,0.0011483427,0.000096370975,0.000061868,0.00012895322,0.38308644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8521973,0.0013091906,0.005784049,0.07428489,0.0007159765,0.00015407268,0.000039764487,0.00007136417,0.06544336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9655604,0.017681701,0.0011050461,0.0033231026,0.007025176,0.005304738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831165,0.009984239,0.00087240816,0.0016693289,0.0027646653,0.0015928535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03099331,0.0003960159,0.00054030016,0.0011331885,0.02517313,0.024750367,0.0033060517,0.018231547,0.004910865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033921346,0.0006585076,0.0005206954,0.0010799848,0.084781334,0.010513881,0.006296692,0.018115232,0.0008784767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039790857,0.000009173957,0.00014455452,0.000015501508,0.0000021969001,0.00009141508,0.008480895,0.000056120607,0.00006880468,0.9716935,0.016102739,0.003331144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002791231,0.000013344931,0.0006388646,0.00031567903,0.0000124507815,0.00015871174,0.013106839,0.0004321876,0.00040259692,0.6786779,0.3061574,0.000056021603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24166615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25180575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24166615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027130932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069009095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.480519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489690535","doi":"","title":"Re-Examining Contract and Unjust Enrichment: Anglo-Canadian Perspectives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Restitution","score_opus":0.04885835430573912,"score_gpt":0.32105361594082277,"score_spread":0.2721952616350837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489690535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06410518,0.053295042,0.0025069455,0.31119716,0.0014221036,0.000054608357,0.00022019418,0.000039094182,0.5671596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9026053,0.0262666,0.0014633001,0.02557584,0.00044275008,0.000050134444,0.00007853195,0.0000843809,0.043433186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078476,0.0021682072,0.00024286992,0.00071087317,0.002588353,0.0035049317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97939086,0.0083304625,0.0007457483,0.00071754993,0.00787716,0.002938266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012376311,0.0007198272,0.0012822701,0.007033935,0.038438246,0.023984343,0.003812458,0.008555207,0.013344986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02016007,0.0005002922,0.00048355837,0.011989709,0.0649737,0.010128117,0.005712799,0.011926873,0.0005116879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021946464,0.00002376489,0.00081318873,0.000088609384,0.000009333485,0.00009317908,0.03742356,0.00017730457,0.000040057326,0.9310039,0.017453825,0.01285124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037056318,0.000018036313,0.0083617205,0.0014890422,0.00006371029,0.00019422012,0.20297295,0.0008011386,0.00023918356,0.2837216,0.5019553,0.0001461186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99128926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99331677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19884035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19884035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24734002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92923164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493288650","doi":"","title":"The Structure of Unjust Enrichment Law: Is Restitution a Right or a Remedy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Damages; Harm; Duty; Trespass; Order (exchange); Breach of contract; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04212962585686394,"score_gpt":0.3288795368211298,"score_spread":0.2867499109642659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493288650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042533748,0.0047541275,0.10672332,0.12233273,0.0006208764,0.00018879464,0.00018761757,0.00018406156,0.72247475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368024,0.0016598519,0.013206577,0.011413115,0.000768236,0.0002995018,0.00008222605,0.0000827978,0.03568537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937406,0.002136397,0.0002504389,0.0012510772,0.0016424333,0.0009789895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936557,0.0032706591,0.00079520984,0.0012012768,0.00066929864,0.0004080185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073403423,0.0004213764,0.00095656223,0.0021621534,0.0047041285,0.008564896,0.0017852596,0.007995045,0.0077594826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012662666,0.0004983746,0.00074554246,0.0013798953,0.049209505,0.013268781,0.0044731847,0.0077514574,0.0009674523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001738846,0.0000033501794,0.000025605284,0.000004090396,8.608536e-7,0.000008268708,0.00008313847,0.000060650407,0.000012447594,0.9988908,0.00031044404,0.0005985952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091788315,0.0000054127217,0.000060493683,0.00002092423,0.0000023574962,0.000013054124,0.000069605696,0.00027891633,0.00004126964,0.99256456,0.0069305515,0.0000036207325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051190546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038890238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008564896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007853886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077561415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056984186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493520628","doi":"","title":"The Many Dimensions of Private Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Popularity; Private law; Tort; Law; Philosophy of law; Political science; Commercial law; Simple (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.022599886654761356,"score_gpt":0.3115253591822438,"score_spread":0.2889254725274824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493520628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051893577,0.032156814,0.040636707,0.33948493,0.0012534785,0.000052662403,0.0002689549,0.000092633214,0.53416026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511546,0.009638855,0.0072154147,0.010501165,0.0012446928,0.00007569146,0.0000869773,0.00004846739,0.02003419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038213,0.004173256,0.00033306496,0.0010069914,0.003196265,0.00090827147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925932,0.0038972262,0.0004803995,0.0013256642,0.00087337656,0.0008301215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056529753,0.00035227634,0.0004358426,0.0023820298,0.007168189,0.016700702,0.0008562473,0.0038849912,0.00674939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010505852,0.0003958964,0.00045054656,0.0027143052,0.056746278,0.021728728,0.008259039,0.0067005334,0.00052822253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020207556,0.000002404451,0.00013685404,0.000009657684,0.0000010304594,0.0000084448,0.0016481127,0.00002812709,0.000017085587,0.9916481,0.002325788,0.004172532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030364724,0.0000046078003,0.0007353792,0.00008374296,0.0000025448267,0.000060411054,0.003024923,0.000153752,0.00003007315,0.92025346,0.07564003,0.000008016994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006833359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008591864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016700702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007670134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005381438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05565101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495406419","doi":"","title":"Droit des successions.","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geology; History","score_opus":0.024967320805052318,"score_gpt":0.2892299153877778,"score_spread":0.2642625945827255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495406419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012464379,0.020573588,0.008213795,0.017020715,0.004699992,0.00008842716,0.001165316,0.0003419093,0.9354319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21705759,0.0076182405,0.005138065,0.0031667456,0.0018265983,0.00018841484,0.00070074206,0.00020132872,0.76410234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967991,0.0009574021,0.0001779026,0.00055327907,0.001001517,0.000510836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983582,0.00059147645,0.00013901164,0.00025355973,0.00050234195,0.00015534497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025304,0.0007541379,0.0009005244,0.0015763418,0.005019414,0.0043948977,0.0013038856,0.0036845272,0.07131504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008040863,0.0004160207,0.00089113566,0.0012438252,0.0022461303,0.003298443,0.0021577731,0.004847169,0.012962056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009174902,0.000027045024,0.00052131596,0.000079454956,0.000015582249,0.00025230055,0.00051318615,0.00026465164,0.0002366307,0.89688486,0.06492874,0.0361844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048136244,0.00003499729,0.0019569288,0.0001815207,0.000010227006,0.0005652326,0.00032653904,0.00036437562,0.00045345115,0.05282828,0.9432084,0.000021911465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04736728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047826365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07131504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004385142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040386817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2385726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495504993","doi":"","title":"The Relationship between Judicial Remedies and the Separation of Powers: Collaborative Constitutionalism and the Suspended Declaration of Invalidity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Constitutionalism; Law; Irish; Political science; Separation of powers; Sociology; Constitution; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06986205527609547,"score_gpt":0.33705504200419933,"score_spread":0.2671929867281039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495504993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09980343,0.0044148415,0.051711824,0.1616405,0.0010554643,0.00022318379,0.000082108796,0.000138725,0.68092996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97050786,0.00049362367,0.005588845,0.007164051,0.00029328294,0.0001103865,0.000017126704,0.000034942506,0.015789934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94504035,0.021527702,0.0027654336,0.0056275586,0.014334427,0.010704587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669494,0.018502166,0.004013479,0.0044898964,0.004171802,0.0018732568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029334484,0.00046623367,0.0010529191,0.0030143848,0.015093469,0.01881468,0.0056274654,0.015131957,0.0036902505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05511164,0.00057787856,0.0015670649,0.0025788245,0.090253346,0.009149413,0.012388094,0.016231924,0.00044466683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043214804,0.000005347677,0.000116744035,0.000007592497,0.0000037755763,0.000049483806,0.0014839107,0.00019246004,0.00003765298,0.9958935,0.0006369694,0.0015682991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057172758,0.000034686258,0.00089477986,0.00013298847,0.000026123176,0.00009385613,0.0029409463,0.0010408527,0.00036979275,0.95143074,0.042915586,0.00006243598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08495793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09016148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08495793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02914162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037289474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21143824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495708875","doi":"","title":"Vindicatory approach to the award of constitutional and public law damages : contemporary Commonwealth developments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Damages; Commonwealth; Plaintiff; Political science; Jurisdiction; High Court; Charter; Common law; Constitution","score_opus":0.1572053411510131,"score_gpt":0.35008155756813136,"score_spread":0.19287621641711827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495708875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040348846,0.026330156,0.012335277,0.078542,0.0012457642,0.0000811836,0.000056868572,0.000070655326,0.84098923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8809319,0.013349678,0.004950362,0.017813105,0.0018057275,0.00020886313,0.00004583308,0.00008738946,0.080807164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761303,0.0056819567,0.0011492375,0.003728563,0.009953855,0.0033561357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889305,0.0055148844,0.0007495759,0.0014440836,0.0026304873,0.0007305555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014498584,0.00045800346,0.0006955516,0.0046949172,0.010381497,0.02502722,0.004763783,0.016154373,0.006562151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022886693,0.0010441352,0.000999237,0.0040981346,0.07374114,0.010677088,0.01139914,0.016464692,0.00067312253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018873591,0.0000063488837,0.0000639307,0.00001568178,0.0000021599958,0.000034890767,0.0007368744,0.00009585921,0.0000361255,0.99442357,0.0010358987,0.0035467423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002026818,0.000089088026,0.0024341114,0.0007400565,0.000028327955,0.0002490326,0.002200278,0.00082142133,0.00035977317,0.70926934,0.2836913,0.00009706134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12376431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13555747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12376431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041728105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02498636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30276006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496559376","doi":"10.1093/ajlh/50.2.200","title":"The Joint Venture Fable","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; General partnership; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Dissent; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.012692699818560221,"score_gpt":0.26600731683952467,"score_spread":0.25331461702096447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496559376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00611132,0.017140528,0.0141515,0.09921688,0.004146647,0.000080989244,0.00012658529,0.00019838025,0.85882735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34955093,0.00976203,0.0070259776,0.054202594,0.002942113,0.00018873217,0.000182512,0.00022372992,0.5759214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952714,0.0010866541,0.00019038038,0.0011920587,0.0016614215,0.0005980353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955712,0.0020340632,0.00040785215,0.000783025,0.00060608546,0.00059777003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005314589,0.0004579214,0.00039668466,0.00093397434,0.0061932425,0.011263514,0.00102921,0.006939167,0.017917957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013389083,0.00039922318,0.0003657441,0.0008601328,0.012052666,0.009402769,0.005564587,0.009532349,0.00458498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024416977,0.0000028392556,0.00004130504,0.00000811112,5.159783e-7,0.000034554203,0.000394672,0.000018439843,0.000030697378,0.9672907,0.02710305,0.005072551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063790635,0.000016711305,0.00013850136,0.00014157736,0.0000019743031,0.0001777718,0.00045261974,0.00019750868,0.00014016098,0.17547934,0.82323754,0.00000992699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062708505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006467202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017917957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065796846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007900509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05994153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498389001","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1128","title":"Normativity, Fairness, and the Problem of Factual Uncertainty","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Normative; Appeal; Harm; Liability; Law; Law and economics; Res ipsa loquitur; Supreme court; Tort; Economic Justice; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.014576078774932862,"score_gpt":0.28526196936748044,"score_spread":0.27068589059254755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498389001","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10581517,0.012503651,0.4371983,0.118149325,0.0015100582,0.00017052595,0.00021252627,0.00013421562,0.32430622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648708,0.0013936915,0.024516642,0.0037890098,0.0009149366,0.00021883198,0.00003392251,0.000037080208,0.004225199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9640982,0.021819443,0.001662648,0.0037981926,0.0068293954,0.0017921451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501942,0.037567586,0.0034706488,0.0046298443,0.0031097776,0.0010279128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04182989,0.0005532264,0.0015682715,0.0017540749,0.008353653,0.008886188,0.0023036178,0.0052174004,0.0021266635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048729636,0.0005242377,0.0011938899,0.001694988,0.05538417,0.014385823,0.0061603505,0.006208984,0.00026532996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004054832,0.000004456395,0.00009941192,0.000010900936,0.0000047608037,0.000015757672,0.0003680001,0.00035824164,0.000021978156,0.9975241,0.00020841301,0.0013799504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034261238,0.0000021414796,0.000046006007,0.000010378302,0.0000019391634,0.000009125784,0.00007427093,0.00036402096,0.000023338045,0.9979886,0.00147304,0.0000036484048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005626825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034947828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04182989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076419935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069342144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22122031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498640858","doi":"","title":"Contractual termination of leases: lessons from the Commonwealth - Part 1","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Lease; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05876855554671652,"score_gpt":0.3887174688803831,"score_spread":0.3299489133336666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498640858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13536882,0.015667627,0.02212067,0.19356687,0.001007245,0.00013039263,0.00006260652,0.0000877071,0.631988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94543993,0.00453074,0.0019225917,0.01558731,0.0005574114,0.00009512805,0.000034819746,0.00005991692,0.031772096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97589797,0.008123091,0.0011740222,0.0012930598,0.0073730904,0.0061387517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95950896,0.025496228,0.0025780858,0.0032068153,0.0064938907,0.0027159469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02319745,0.00033905814,0.0008557429,0.0014624587,0.01333364,0.017817503,0.003845217,0.019325677,0.004043489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062481225,0.0005979648,0.0008344408,0.0020660697,0.03269359,0.012470611,0.0075521497,0.015205498,0.00059982843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023765906,0.00005390158,0.0023342378,0.000029102022,0.000009369602,0.0004485726,0.009273497,0.0005041245,0.00006733349,0.9594529,0.00977077,0.018032411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054695625,0.00012608862,0.00868169,0.0009536799,0.000030983385,0.0008684224,0.021339813,0.0028723842,0.00062300795,0.7306448,0.23367575,0.0001286405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14472735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16092718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14472735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019743007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03025968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2877699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500014366","doi":"","title":"Party Autonomy, Private Autonomy, and Freedom of Contract","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Law; Constraint (computer-aided design); Political science; Economics; Business; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01615223223609084,"score_gpt":0.2776465826371781,"score_spread":0.26149435040108726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500014366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0284178,0.0043748035,0.056458198,0.016405396,0.0006170748,0.00012081276,0.00024535277,0.000071535855,0.89328897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512728,0.0020905547,0.013608137,0.0022486108,0.00063203496,0.00024092192,0.0001852429,0.000048568876,0.029673144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990704,0.0035248948,0.0005317148,0.0011419195,0.0030301604,0.0010672961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949346,0.0024428698,0.00058073073,0.0007761074,0.0007945729,0.0004712396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050683063,0.0004060798,0.00039893406,0.0021294188,0.004493416,0.0075340946,0.0008535364,0.0028895524,0.0060831765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00808931,0.00025099766,0.00071983924,0.0025258053,0.041327897,0.009966072,0.0052363523,0.0040129223,0.0006541524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016788912,0.0000013782211,0.000042250995,0.000006586918,6.9849244e-7,0.0000073723636,0.00033758293,0.000025730482,0.000014857431,0.99838173,0.00029662,0.0008833373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066349676,0.0000052286173,0.00038642343,0.000039220617,0.0000026991677,0.0000459015,0.00051189784,0.00018436312,0.000068147776,0.95755225,0.041189037,0.000008164761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073210765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045063538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075340946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004904119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060113603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035582066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500207795","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 Terms","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Charter; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Judicial review; Administrative discretion; Standard of review; Commission; Human rights; Constitutional law; Discretion; Public administration","score_opus":0.03779567698418788,"score_gpt":0.29898921258039274,"score_spread":0.26119353559620484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500207795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09815619,0.033851642,0.0047439816,0.17421792,0.009571014,0.00031437277,0.0021817435,0.00021577654,0.6767473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5160604,0.018110638,0.0177557,0.15018791,0.004810271,0.00091969804,0.0018842089,0.00018711164,0.2900841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98086804,0.0021428077,0.002344552,0.0018491298,0.009948098,0.0028475006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841524,0.0045947838,0.0031697508,0.0007989652,0.0047722748,0.0025118329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136602605,0.00036343068,0.00041123058,0.004304715,0.008161698,0.02064245,0.0022884042,0.015004336,0.004358186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019579327,0.00079345686,0.0010980321,0.0046723727,0.009227741,0.0054311347,0.005264784,0.015184641,0.0012301104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031708576,0.00011381493,0.0030032704,0.00011812237,0.000009274154,0.0003018909,0.004670441,0.0002647074,0.0005141196,0.8853526,0.086540766,0.019079326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015903168,0.000058920767,0.0150911845,0.00046385964,0.000011755406,0.0002004551,0.0029569021,0.00024171617,0.00062237924,0.0074378243,0.97283566,0.00006341195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22240354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34027213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22240354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05084069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051683456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.442218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500452805","doi":"10.1002/iir.1237","title":"The Extra‐Territoriality of the Statutory Stay in an English Administration – Revisited","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Statutory law; Administration (probate law); Scope (computer science); Law; Judgement; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09543685748338061,"score_gpt":0.4147048412610635,"score_spread":0.3192679837776829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500452805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2371062,0.028025292,0.012733666,0.07494561,0.0012404604,0.000065384316,0.00017140374,0.000038780843,0.6456732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736482,0.0029306917,0.00075661787,0.0059519676,0.0005518054,0.00004962409,0.00003306831,0.000016031054,0.016062114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98942447,0.0043652286,0.0007270979,0.0010110324,0.0025275124,0.0019445304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331737,0.003645852,0.00067632424,0.00043893882,0.0015369671,0.00038447525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006960555,0.00017294055,0.00079413387,0.0011022845,0.0039096316,0.00853279,0.001472942,0.003927738,0.0038109876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006514714,0.00032510248,0.00076350867,0.0012611535,0.018994205,0.004383196,0.0065054647,0.0062262793,0.00041144722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011990014,0.0000070269944,0.0004592205,0.00006314761,0.00000912335,0.00023195145,0.0031681303,0.0001953592,0.00018081046,0.9912115,0.0017753163,0.002686385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007417066,0.00025455045,0.019108454,0.001849394,0.00014174449,0.0010958258,0.03021613,0.0012710869,0.001123546,0.43645796,0.50826126,0.00014585727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027987808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045520514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027987808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065392125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007933868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055649817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500474037","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2296451","title":"William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Vol. 4 (1769)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.013460444363381105,"score_gpt":0.26804939765348157,"score_spread":0.25458895329010045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500474037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002201763,0.08548777,0.0006410438,0.7397606,0.026250696,0.00008742957,0.0009804904,0.00006748178,0.14452273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030006932,0.02049151,0.00065284566,0.68541706,0.011771155,0.00030384274,0.00020613056,0.00011829261,0.25103217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554116,0.0013191486,0.0003349922,0.0007918893,0.0014288584,0.0005839073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99401736,0.0041550472,0.00035421574,0.0001887317,0.0010866832,0.00019796011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004729626,0.0010286395,0.0007019925,0.0015512258,0.012031461,0.0052454905,0.0024891247,0.026612656,0.020658338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019410029,0.0010540411,0.000756921,0.0018680843,0.005954489,0.0076395595,0.0023053875,0.021202527,0.008260559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026288993,0.0000087198105,0.00019849718,0.000081215236,0.0000074116865,0.00013705263,0.0014136579,0.000038989354,0.000062604995,0.06361661,0.9315967,0.0028123248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019526404,0.000009988188,0.0012120729,0.0005340753,0.000009210075,0.000055474615,0.0013149017,0.000036238645,0.00021533406,0.02711995,0.9694269,0.000046353478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11294201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21949075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11294201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058962065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050300984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2245692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502640439","doi":"","title":"The Impact of U.S. Tort Law in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.02515195250760102,"score_gpt":0.2416356845456835,"score_spread":0.21648373203808247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502640439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32270744,0.011857545,0.000553449,0.12001726,0.00070209487,0.00009377473,0.0016070935,0.00008765458,0.5423737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557943,0.008686717,0.00040294003,0.008550143,0.000106035644,0.00001953422,0.00027822715,0.0000307242,0.026131328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337596,0.00041327943,0.00012686945,0.00029943674,0.0029065183,0.0028779556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99240303,0.0010420204,0.0005104812,0.00010764256,0.0039536073,0.0019833033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016438195,0.0002761858,0.000378897,0.0032390251,0.01577172,0.007230563,0.0011120145,0.0017475454,0.009046736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008843083,0.0003260955,0.0006825237,0.0052549117,0.0046245637,0.0014214747,0.0028634137,0.0030929025,0.0003316575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022171713,0.00015714986,0.100050434,0.000376252,0.00017823177,0.0022286084,0.010691058,0.0050567104,0.0011750326,0.63709986,0.14423853,0.09852643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000847304,0.00012901473,0.37225536,0.0010511806,0.00036650605,0.00062588346,0.031664193,0.004045706,0.0014475164,0.026358362,0.56164867,0.00032284568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99753976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99858403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18307881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18307881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2161288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9475128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502843092","doi":"","title":"Dismissals Due to Business Reasons in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01408840605728378,"score_gpt":0.2723866506233968,"score_spread":0.258298244566113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502843092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5840557,0.009036434,0.0012849555,0.0948115,0.0016744058,0.00035145617,0.0023147229,0.00012379808,0.30634704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505914,0.0028864476,0.00031471768,0.01050458,0.00018095014,0.000033501856,0.00043250638,0.000043949756,0.035011977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834508,0.00072674506,0.00042804008,0.000724675,0.0073418184,0.0073279017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96849436,0.0038859225,0.003511469,0.00065229624,0.013537707,0.0099181365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004067676,0.00031975366,0.00075984467,0.0034866552,0.018004958,0.006163638,0.0024668975,0.004047672,0.007920289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02251603,0.0006713284,0.0007168616,0.004463663,0.004592366,0.0009169696,0.0035812417,0.0062288,0.00070190814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006623895,0.00027146586,0.26025093,0.00060476724,0.0002526765,0.0077548744,0.033703893,0.0022579047,0.0023274398,0.24592637,0.3227918,0.12319542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018515001,0.000134489,0.56426287,0.0010667499,0.0002099854,0.0010824741,0.0374457,0.0022195415,0.0010461506,0.0077691977,0.38407025,0.0005074574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99544394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99780804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12204767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12204767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20032963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88552195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503329074","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Accountability Transformed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.014126027353095628,"score_gpt":0.3208394058081857,"score_spread":0.30671337845509006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503329074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009871398,0.004456845,0.030049177,0.07388019,0.0014241273,0.000093366885,0.00032348456,0.00019360943,0.8797078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7692226,0.0023684504,0.010373166,0.035677914,0.00080968515,0.00018078307,0.0001468446,0.00014470247,0.18107577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878342,0.0022351595,0.000325981,0.0019224511,0.0053633414,0.0023188898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934162,0.0017932294,0.00035202713,0.0008215426,0.0029832053,0.0006337742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008654935,0.00065033074,0.00070795766,0.0014400005,0.012069825,0.0110920025,0.0018732384,0.006178778,0.0070230193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019746777,0.000348476,0.00064531615,0.0012403362,0.025385274,0.005321985,0.0048878635,0.010257922,0.0012113024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031954537,0.0000020710393,0.000083827064,0.000004711697,0.0000012924671,0.00001938027,0.00042950967,0.00005726844,0.000026022806,0.99111193,0.005793334,0.0024673513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014763262,0.000016300706,0.00063228013,0.00017089913,0.00001732341,0.00008862377,0.00049144914,0.0008883888,0.0003457836,0.5125523,0.48474398,0.00003789674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5546655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.515102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5546655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03954387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05644453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8959143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503976820","doi":"","title":"An Indeterminate Theory of Canadian Corporate Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Shareholder; Corporate law; Shareholder primacy; Agency cost; Fiduciary; Opportunism; Law and economics; Corporation; Supreme court; Business; Jurisprudence; Stakeholder; Economics; Accounting; Market economy; Law; Political science; Finance; Duty","score_opus":0.02164543958398983,"score_gpt":0.2733346287129741,"score_spread":0.25168918912898425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503976820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043736817,0.003011616,0.021682395,0.017227277,0.00037143196,0.000055866774,0.00019651325,0.000055976798,0.9530252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7557826,0.0061844676,0.02628576,0.008064336,0.0008500599,0.00022538462,0.00031401493,0.00008527657,0.2022081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976761,0.000345386,0.00005481791,0.00046945852,0.0011338036,0.00032045535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988122,0.00033200547,0.000063362786,0.0001345513,0.0005483401,0.00010959295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020502468,0.0004901318,0.00041833005,0.0028214254,0.0071583237,0.0065831887,0.0017687525,0.0026691812,0.010540175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041033532,0.00031516814,0.0004832759,0.0023752304,0.018561168,0.004761333,0.0020340455,0.0031527847,0.0010293748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.541654e-7,4.2814227e-7,0.00001143833,0.000002158063,1.9955993e-7,0.0000035815792,0.00007526589,0.00004164763,0.0000037465998,0.99844533,0.0007414866,0.0006743324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007773097,0.000003402084,0.00021907662,0.00004582288,0.00000352546,0.000026971582,0.00015518336,0.0011635866,0.00003698893,0.86418533,0.13414147,0.000010882601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6364003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59398264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36359972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054489467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0258046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.731482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504571867","doi":"","title":"Proprietary Remedies in Insolvency: A Comparison of the Restatement Third on Restitution and Unjust Enrichment with English and Commonwealth Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Commonwealth; Bankruptcy; Unjust enrichment; Insolvency; Law; English law; Political science; Constructive; Constructive trust; Common law; Law and economics; Economics; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.03398964145090017,"score_gpt":0.3017995118716932,"score_spread":0.267809870420793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504571867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6893032,0.0043644058,0.0027090956,0.007985456,0.00008318627,0.00008048891,0.00006353356,0.000016347434,0.29539433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950942,0.000589094,0.0002066501,0.0007198328,0.00002621922,0.00002188518,0.0000114793065,0.000003859112,0.0033268342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917067,0.0031808068,0.00039765186,0.00045048454,0.0022921027,0.0019722355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861752,0.009976566,0.0020869353,0.00060689705,0.000714095,0.00044032902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052792374,0.0001654157,0.0006881029,0.0021790888,0.0027826605,0.006541087,0.0009922812,0.0028047399,0.0054815672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018618733,0.00028407425,0.0008315987,0.0018316365,0.01684538,0.0051780865,0.0054135197,0.0031520294,0.00020432097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001425282,0.00010596383,0.008839597,0.000078731515,0.00003399282,0.00070061936,0.007935291,0.0008036989,0.00033820726,0.9705631,0.0011253267,0.009332949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005993267,0.0017895243,0.30702722,0.001345587,0.00075309817,0.002307524,0.08122756,0.00919325,0.0050862865,0.4698299,0.12056748,0.00027317085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028645018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045981947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028645018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008336027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004652983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060482383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505790278","doi":"","title":"Salomon Redux: The Moralities of Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Commonwealth; Law; Institution; Colonialism; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Persona; Management; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Humanities","score_opus":0.048182382162363535,"score_gpt":0.2978198820948689,"score_spread":0.2496374999325054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505790278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03870351,0.010261056,0.008448492,0.20516579,0.0005305973,0.00003323826,0.000027236894,0.000052148986,0.73677784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89956015,0.0023887693,0.001500607,0.026861146,0.00037623665,0.000072171046,0.000008767374,0.00003547862,0.06919675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935359,0.0035374444,0.00009182536,0.00042115574,0.0014863032,0.00092748366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971277,0.0017374821,0.00026381027,0.00022577503,0.0003648402,0.00028049134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051382286,0.0002830345,0.0003010816,0.0011763838,0.009292731,0.009641249,0.0010925251,0.0067278086,0.0049010855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010435352,0.00022952334,0.00034337264,0.0008936108,0.02778323,0.005836576,0.005592184,0.00722386,0.00072645297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021408696,0.0000024924257,0.000065128224,0.000004506989,5.814225e-7,0.000050020284,0.0010502975,0.00003940158,0.000020030997,0.994393,0.0030027707,0.0013695982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010765999,0.000012345467,0.00035618138,0.00019576373,0.0000035556163,0.0001998896,0.0051918007,0.0005400217,0.00027821193,0.7804408,0.2127527,0.000017880886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012184976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012582845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012184976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008141796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00611027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05907315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506490462","doi":"","title":"Can the Reasonable Person Still Be 'Highly Offended'? An Invitation to Consider the Civil Law Tradition’s Personality Rights-Based Approach to Tort Privacy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Context (archaeology); Privacy laws of the United States; Political science; Doctrine; Information privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.06528980324307203,"score_gpt":0.30447930755447855,"score_spread":0.2391895043114065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506490462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033432096,0.008604729,0.012848849,0.5814278,0.0017792119,0.00003160634,0.000096926204,0.000053218308,0.36172554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9026601,0.0037411235,0.0016901026,0.05720519,0.0012590045,0.000054080858,0.00005253582,0.00006324406,0.033274654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99211156,0.0044102836,0.00014106208,0.000973942,0.0012158947,0.0011472284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568343,0.002114794,0.0004356583,0.0005831698,0.0006463504,0.0005367132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008352046,0.00037219818,0.0005965465,0.0008168946,0.010015727,0.013346481,0.0020438528,0.008349155,0.007174263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014836869,0.00019505271,0.0005161778,0.00088840025,0.05146614,0.023862313,0.0052533043,0.01039102,0.0012108514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062695112,0.000006888233,0.00022734012,0.000012498114,0.000002337739,0.00008883963,0.012369324,0.000026597374,0.000027777904,0.9772306,0.006347206,0.0036542458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089462665,0.000034977216,0.0011159908,0.0002536161,0.000008374868,0.0003392956,0.061128743,0.00020218053,0.0001881685,0.61911017,0.31757545,0.000034088498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015974592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022828769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015974592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006261669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005141903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045431733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506793606","doi":"","title":"Self-Government and the Inalienability of Aboriginal Title","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Paternalism; Surrender; Government (linguistics); Crown (dentistry); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.012636171928551675,"score_gpt":0.28778568727519155,"score_spread":0.2751495153466399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506793606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3012011,0.0025196027,0.0074203345,0.02666132,0.00019768131,0.00004582098,0.000037911184,0.00003061761,0.6618857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98451877,0.0003641741,0.0006703501,0.0009040302,0.000056280667,0.00001894457,0.00000795123,0.000007887516,0.013451623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942636,0.002571847,0.0002993047,0.00058711803,0.0011697517,0.0011084498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926208,0.0032661934,0.0015105382,0.0009655522,0.0011176848,0.0005190626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050171325,0.00014538351,0.000355553,0.0009873065,0.00639508,0.005939901,0.00093787926,0.0036849265,0.002829871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008673877,0.00025369835,0.00033442586,0.0008621357,0.036514066,0.003705038,0.004068412,0.0032350651,0.00030265207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005453126,0.000014451793,0.0013457095,0.00000963089,0.0000029898308,0.0001362815,0.006266899,0.00007003546,0.00010590944,0.9894733,0.00041987447,0.002149472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033560056,0.00007852178,0.0121837715,0.00024074178,0.000024206753,0.0007314419,0.01624496,0.0008592681,0.00075940794,0.87540436,0.09340007,0.000039716768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015707232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019866772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015707232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004399735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051420378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03192246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507354143","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2010.00167.x","title":"The case of ‘losses in any event’: a question of duty, cause or damages?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Damages; Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Tort; Argument (complex analysis); Duty; Event (particle physics); Relevance (law); Appeal; Scope (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Duty of care; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Business; Liability; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.052535518684242756,"score_gpt":0.4218381476761031,"score_spread":0.36930262899186034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507354143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12796322,0.013664913,0.069067344,0.38857344,0.0031663605,0.00018898495,0.00012602554,0.00006664122,0.39718306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495309,0.0025196197,0.004471128,0.026535042,0.0026835322,0.00013915585,0.000030453137,0.00003887894,0.014051214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98224133,0.0075579635,0.0009848323,0.002176544,0.005208342,0.0018309295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97038865,0.022812959,0.002192442,0.0022873394,0.0016750923,0.00064352073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025567267,0.00050126313,0.0016073863,0.0016023223,0.006383939,0.009102994,0.004076192,0.022060974,0.0033181263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05061991,0.0006795287,0.0013348737,0.0011763099,0.053217046,0.022402547,0.00811905,0.015155276,0.0005463757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002039841,0.00001815688,0.00055398117,0.00004902465,0.000020870079,0.0009081116,0.0030042755,0.00021576895,0.00013541963,0.9872164,0.003497428,0.0043602223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001574441,0.000037363086,0.00090235315,0.00022000777,0.000028454522,0.0013148407,0.0029973262,0.0006619115,0.00026925726,0.9523736,0.041142642,0.000036594844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034345035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002619761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025567267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003720959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003707614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13521421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508417898","doi":"","title":"Standards of Review in Irish Administrative Law after 'Meadows'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Scrutiny; Law; Standard of review; Irish; Expansive; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01606707249915404,"score_gpt":0.3702382768156792,"score_spread":0.35417120431652516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508417898","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00702496,0.044706926,0.031771757,0.64865637,0.029600225,0.00081866176,0.00034665922,0.00046690268,0.23660755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2655653,0.01378937,0.06356963,0.4902284,0.013603897,0.00207038,0.00030615935,0.00032048556,0.15054643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8762568,0.045626644,0.014592854,0.011709267,0.045368087,0.006446343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93303436,0.034099054,0.0039890786,0.006150393,0.020703971,0.0020230187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08445079,0.00059077656,0.00077106024,0.003523069,0.007589485,0.023369068,0.0038523613,0.015908504,0.0020063005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113337524,0.00087730814,0.0018165868,0.0027911828,0.026188372,0.008370002,0.0059154304,0.021156343,0.0010783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017198592,0.000012850734,0.0002518064,0.00020849443,0.000009762692,0.00009295024,0.0029867627,0.00015720284,0.00016338716,0.8915918,0.08981709,0.014690666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003969348,0.00007574279,0.00163274,0.0010350576,0.000024043396,0.00012327963,0.0014690148,0.0004531772,0.00052963366,0.17005442,0.8244212,0.00014200514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08320798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08960775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08445079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027748842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042094495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4466238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508717189","doi":"10.21991/c9c65b","title":"SUPREME COURT SCEPTICAL ABOUT PRESUMPTION OF CROWN IMMUNITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Skepticism; Qualified immunity; Sovereign immunity; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Philosophy; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056661407719705084,"score_gpt":0.3059521306292208,"score_spread":0.2492907229095157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508717189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04594227,0.0066440413,0.03418622,0.48869005,0.0042184195,0.00018827259,0.00077084464,0.0002127455,0.41914716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7802996,0.002541026,0.012720923,0.1743372,0.0030703463,0.00025322265,0.00019602156,0.00009917598,0.02648241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851194,0.002706733,0.0011344877,0.0024101473,0.006768621,0.0018604968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968914,0.019012775,0.0019254694,0.00251216,0.0065649333,0.0010706462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022147425,0.00045901313,0.0012343234,0.002895653,0.0063336887,0.009142171,0.0051886593,0.018943692,0.0039235633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070120156,0.00081345305,0.0013619141,0.0015317074,0.029330987,0.0071060876,0.0033137691,0.040503863,0.0010360423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001608613,0.000017226752,0.00021989408,0.000030673364,0.000019168394,0.000082402585,0.0009872235,0.00023979113,0.00016087719,0.98292106,0.013328649,0.0019770907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000426351,0.0000132606965,0.0004360691,0.00021274535,0.000035017907,0.000067352106,0.0003784225,0.0008043311,0.0006385305,0.96433306,0.033005614,0.00003297672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019872395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017362919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022147425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008392215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013733767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11712819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510516166","doi":"","title":"Peoples Department Stores V. Wise and the 'Best Interests of the Corporation'","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Corporation; Shareholder; Economic Justice; Normative; Law; Political science; High Court; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Management; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.012044497461059242,"score_gpt":0.2807983144685046,"score_spread":0.2687538170074454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510516166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08047241,0.0058627552,0.001147794,0.27792808,0.0010481306,0.00006731279,0.0002506403,0.00007024894,0.6331526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7090214,0.0020227262,0.00069531717,0.16974387,0.000380346,0.00005155952,0.000062738334,0.00004154168,0.11798045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945913,0.00041125974,0.00009556427,0.00034123452,0.0020474684,0.002513144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690765,0.0012266586,0.00021457885,0.00008731436,0.0009584533,0.00060525956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026461869,0.00027389816,0.0005201954,0.00084224745,0.018614281,0.009490512,0.0016226564,0.01418705,0.0048034117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076787695,0.00046720135,0.0005164088,0.0013158858,0.009342376,0.0018616307,0.0023081496,0.007913855,0.00046340597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003572435,0.000021543112,0.0029102599,0.00004876118,0.000016074226,0.00093376875,0.0075836754,0.00017772187,0.0002938612,0.8062987,0.17701957,0.0046604075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009576765,0.000069844624,0.01172541,0.00069204735,0.00013439133,0.00052138907,0.021097422,0.0006492141,0.002298722,0.12205149,0.84044486,0.00021938836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.808482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93276536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.808482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01947974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04187175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38529176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511124634","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1168","title":"Narrowing Interjurisdictional Immunity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Political science; Sovereign immunity; Qualified immunity; Legislation; Federal jurisdiction; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06306659848464101,"score_gpt":0.34385479943709313,"score_spread":0.2807882009524521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511124634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06547581,0.007420304,0.04224424,0.022713488,0.00093322713,0.00008132598,0.00008258131,0.00011363607,0.86093545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500812,0.0019416395,0.005410591,0.010807368,0.0003185262,0.000049025664,0.00004793216,0.00005278686,0.03129094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912298,0.0011674248,0.0002741193,0.0013983377,0.0039149304,0.00201545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951768,0.0018395123,0.0002714181,0.0008380347,0.0015478507,0.00032635283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052463165,0.00027827415,0.00051131856,0.0019216521,0.0071063773,0.0057052225,0.0031588117,0.0041330867,0.005182411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011535412,0.00038117325,0.0007851645,0.001095632,0.019786125,0.005553729,0.0069943704,0.009105743,0.0006553993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002991236,0.000005532236,0.0002251335,0.000011446543,0.0000018554118,0.00005519028,0.0011430746,0.00012985292,0.00014119671,0.9922748,0.001508791,0.004500004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017344448,0.000045070443,0.0029482795,0.00044628652,0.000042492138,0.0004094104,0.002819073,0.0018680146,0.0017147646,0.6481374,0.34149086,0.00006103348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09936544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14590694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09936544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014130264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01709041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19757414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514673998","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.014","title":"The dilution of the trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dilution; Psychology; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02495265036763457,"score_gpt":0.22103523534357347,"score_spread":0.1960825849759389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514673998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017786693,0.009055311,0.01809945,0.06653698,0.001573391,0.000048390833,0.000058803107,0.00010234331,0.8867388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7743615,0.0056610336,0.005626828,0.017719276,0.001224275,0.00012859967,0.000053835232,0.00017423595,0.19505048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915427,0.0041423184,0.00025223976,0.0011488714,0.0023370676,0.00057683775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471843,0.002810445,0.0003831113,0.00089419604,0.0008161848,0.0003775854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005627092,0.0005311962,0.0005683096,0.0012889237,0.004014823,0.011109853,0.000946736,0.004638135,0.0083674425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012322159,0.0003678381,0.0005369122,0.0010415249,0.042008344,0.0164268,0.006707014,0.008631177,0.0020670237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037576867,0.0000032693838,0.00005188361,0.000013121846,0.0000015882273,0.000030800675,0.0012694616,0.000047226105,0.00004925108,0.99205136,0.0029989954,0.0034792786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000132296145,0.000024683264,0.00023318031,0.00017514387,0.0000058390133,0.00019631593,0.0014946421,0.00047784502,0.00028243384,0.7531423,0.24393724,0.000017144657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055869385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004184888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012695843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012695843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050270064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09211528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516496604","doi":"10.7202/1045921ar","title":"LA MODIFICATION ET LA TERMINAISON DES FIDUCIES PAR LES TRIBUNAUX DU QUÉBEC","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04698786017528817,"score_gpt":0.31454648249214956,"score_spread":0.2675586223168614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516496604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14271599,0.047186475,0.012538628,0.09007746,0.005277215,0.00047357977,0.0037831974,0.000301872,0.6976456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59001786,0.0087225335,0.008687036,0.012814378,0.00039395163,0.00031765646,0.00096248795,0.00015570223,0.37792844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881477,0.0017365542,0.00060864526,0.00092910405,0.005394274,0.0031838086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893259,0.0014373711,0.00051429856,0.0006917958,0.007243925,0.00078670797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006693228,0.00048345534,0.0007231764,0.0022767608,0.010587083,0.0072159413,0.0024658462,0.004282686,0.0071434276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017715916,0.0006120816,0.00065661845,0.0033734993,0.007371193,0.001973301,0.0022046494,0.005776847,0.0009327875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010238435,0.00004670532,0.009685582,0.00019824512,0.00004195467,0.00029074913,0.009716969,0.0010871378,0.0011374071,0.7551079,0.1450783,0.07750666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046714802,0.000055165194,0.05059115,0.000676981,0.00005675118,0.00019829012,0.0037538526,0.00079189223,0.00071283185,0.015361386,0.9275724,0.00018264797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98329586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0779696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0779696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12577143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56571174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517684064","doi":"","title":"Reasonable Expectations and the Interpretation of Contracts Across Legal Traditions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Duty; Meaning (existential); Good faith; Law; Epistemology; Faith; Fair dealing; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Positive economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007972653095379907,"score_gpt":0.30074654689407376,"score_spread":0.29277389379869384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517684064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07115368,0.0060630324,0.26215044,0.077584155,0.0004797381,0.0001795422,0.00016779873,0.00016271866,0.58205897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680748,0.0009751087,0.021206975,0.0024837484,0.00020388966,0.00012410282,0.00005072268,0.00004747949,0.0068331882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96991783,0.019869199,0.0012310187,0.0016675113,0.005270324,0.0020440149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98158437,0.011470302,0.0019979612,0.0019668827,0.002237542,0.00074296625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021265369,0.0005035237,0.0008602098,0.0025469894,0.00701604,0.011871643,0.0025815805,0.0051404745,0.0028062353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030117726,0.00050323555,0.0012158417,0.0016768393,0.05101612,0.010303413,0.005438411,0.0064621884,0.00038075668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018518554,0.0000018165189,0.000048537266,0.0000048350503,0.0000020870511,0.000020093468,0.0013769916,0.00015749969,0.000013583259,0.9975343,0.0001530319,0.0006854111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034908933,0.00000249709,0.00007936776,0.000024652094,0.0000023162552,0.000011788284,0.00042459523,0.0004315054,0.000020570878,0.9959651,0.0030292724,0.00000483846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03513567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020519579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03513567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016524527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01259992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119894385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517743952","doi":"","title":"The Conceptual Foundations of France’s Fiducie Faced with the Trust of the Common Law: Between the Law of Contract and Property Law (Les Fondements Conceptuels de La Fiducie Française Face au Trust de La Common Law: Entre Droit Des Contrats et Droit Des Biens)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Property law; Common law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Numerus clausus; Property (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Rescission; Law and economics; Political science; Civil code; Appropriation; Trust law; Property rights; Sociology; Commercial law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology; Duty","score_opus":0.01391727670167818,"score_gpt":0.29023965455185985,"score_spread":0.27632237785018166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517743952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24187964,0.01440722,0.06702999,0.07011537,0.00043627652,0.000079984944,0.0001755305,0.00014604726,0.60573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923993,0.0005592831,0.002094703,0.0006021725,0.000058499474,0.00002542375,0.000017260414,0.000019028419,0.004224531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264646,0.0044180094,0.00016488339,0.0006643197,0.0010736756,0.001032722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603736,0.0021386386,0.00050302775,0.00034320672,0.00061995734,0.0003578831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005910523,0.00043373092,0.00046343068,0.0023843448,0.008321632,0.016120184,0.0012161968,0.0050250012,0.0029222202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008195705,0.0003494466,0.00074853067,0.0019211483,0.040017087,0.009353243,0.0034742397,0.003058734,0.0004005691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028840136,0.0000022353192,0.00011743132,0.000005211637,0.0000011618746,0.000047531958,0.0061914255,0.00006889278,0.000019979085,0.992289,0.00033033802,0.000923864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002562589,0.00004358894,0.002196366,0.00025390496,0.000017261007,0.0003535486,0.017414432,0.0016601627,0.00018466784,0.86831284,0.10948174,0.000055892928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07782634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046248157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07782634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025527364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008824967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18521488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519716147","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4499","title":"The Merits of “Merits” Review: A Comparative Look at the Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Adjudication; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Enforcement; Legitimacy; Administrative law; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1242210924432735,"score_gpt":0.4465505210113872,"score_spread":0.3223294285681137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519716147","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06257676,0.4766691,0.0018779745,0.1488348,0.0063131587,0.00029532274,0.00017898176,0.000045559827,0.30320832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7049684,0.19373477,0.0027487816,0.06589202,0.008861869,0.0003291971,0.00023243627,0.000080557285,0.023151897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360927,0.029703604,0.0045235427,0.001816355,0.0240299,0.003833924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85627013,0.08557827,0.009974626,0.0031492799,0.04103471,0.0039930055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06483009,0.00023107644,0.0013378928,0.016942894,0.005438138,0.013709548,0.0018512241,0.0053783604,0.0045368033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15848,0.0005718074,0.0009231907,0.01285684,0.006731551,0.007196915,0.0045054215,0.0027551607,0.0005454489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006492558,0.00017470494,0.0167962,0.010540466,0.000463678,0.0022568433,0.027277118,0.0009188585,0.0011681386,0.5047197,0.1138198,0.32121527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012868448,0.0005448919,0.07267599,0.0074602407,0.0005336586,0.001202594,0.010995101,0.00051851093,0.00033429757,0.028849518,0.87663364,0.00012289562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03589277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11377705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06483009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017008748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025966376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34285837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522329692","doi":"","title":"Coping with Complex Causation Information in Personal Injury Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Tort; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Psychology; Personal injury; Blame; Law; Computer security; Social psychology; Liability; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.018795515399108956,"score_gpt":0.291024032343544,"score_spread":0.27222851694443506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522329692","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21792151,0.006632507,0.4811141,0.12651576,0.001356087,0.0011619593,0.0004053177,0.0010833534,0.16380934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88534504,0.0029777612,0.09669934,0.0047031613,0.0010313607,0.0002207105,0.0002898917,0.00011144698,0.008621267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881428,0.005104125,0.001056305,0.0011380542,0.0034540964,0.0011045854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509579,0.03979663,0.0034482079,0.0028730282,0.0022577944,0.0006665606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013852284,0.00062067783,0.0007217519,0.0049008876,0.005940106,0.0090258345,0.0036312738,0.0063599595,0.008424533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064634085,0.0008812765,0.001245813,0.0028294632,0.007814332,0.021499027,0.010108172,0.006500167,0.0005989984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008439733,0.00018429887,0.010322241,0.00045399368,0.0000712364,0.013610151,0.028498394,0.008219639,0.0013849731,0.7998891,0.01540663,0.121874936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042006355,0.000099964185,0.003781241,0.0010438057,0.00012017447,0.009291018,0.018307248,0.026453018,0.0026052732,0.8397504,0.09837036,0.00013543211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002893374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044294083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013852284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040477603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030510533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07325876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523157275","doi":"","title":"The Price of Excessive Damage Awards","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Tort; Sympathy; Variety (cybernetics); Rationality; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Law; Unjust enrichment; Economics; Business; Political science; Liability; Psychology; Restitution; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01614943173311302,"score_gpt":0.28661698333289093,"score_spread":0.2704675515997779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523157275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14844722,0.008289386,0.02867891,0.10074853,0.002720987,0.00013143392,0.00033820805,0.00039830318,0.71024704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94374555,0.001613089,0.0038125778,0.006379258,0.0018740029,0.00005600707,0.00006296996,0.00014232814,0.042314235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817262,0.0032989858,0.0007618944,0.0012616809,0.011492979,0.0014582296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96853036,0.016788276,0.0027753208,0.0036155211,0.0058057997,0.0024846839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009168877,0.00046424178,0.0008837458,0.0028764056,0.0025929962,0.0103056105,0.0014358254,0.0050212094,0.01631546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052728992,0.00049385586,0.0005960478,0.0013141092,0.006297339,0.0056793387,0.003971783,0.0052351453,0.0020494391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020169932,0.00010677554,0.007427967,0.00013489406,0.00007831185,0.00087852817,0.0010053009,0.002339645,0.0015021614,0.85736376,0.03375377,0.095207185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013081242,0.0004399033,0.027225213,0.00076396175,0.00016889813,0.0039180755,0.0028667862,0.009190951,0.0021496161,0.7074241,0.2455074,0.0002143437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042883893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007019562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01631546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072232718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031530994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05458063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526196003","doi":"","title":"Commencing Proceedings Just After the Limitation Period","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Statute; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Political science; Plaintiff; Statute of limitations; Power (physics); Supreme court","score_opus":0.016847617782860865,"score_gpt":0.296142945841202,"score_spread":0.2792953280583411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526196003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11478112,0.007769379,0.037744932,0.06330957,0.011355889,0.003905104,0.0015010042,0.0024137683,0.75721925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6887903,0.003810302,0.020256305,0.033453234,0.004790316,0.0018229728,0.0010473256,0.0004936352,0.24553557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840588,0.0019692117,0.0016192303,0.0019521236,0.0075680315,0.0028326241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735884,0.009687398,0.0017129042,0.0041073314,0.0065572625,0.0043466403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011679566,0.00040972055,0.0006822713,0.0013308421,0.008076167,0.0068024816,0.0031655426,0.0071682236,0.01838728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048305806,0.0007307052,0.0007858112,0.00094500795,0.003153017,0.0053410516,0.004377128,0.0072721043,0.008813204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009806748,0.00088844605,0.011581815,0.0014773596,0.000114536255,0.010640855,0.033473633,0.0006970179,0.041017734,0.37060222,0.21897236,0.3095533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009008346,0.0005429755,0.01808572,0.00070798583,0.000065570246,0.0012643776,0.0039603924,0.0002521307,0.004071031,0.0121272355,0.95869225,0.00014017751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04032868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12132598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04032868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008195476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015804049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08018786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527306418","doi":"","title":"The Test for Causation in Canada: But for, but ... Maybe Not","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Test (biology); Confusion; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04677605707819044,"score_gpt":0.2875057320167952,"score_spread":0.24072967493860475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527306418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010072459,0.06364044,0.0052534114,0.70965993,0.0065554953,0.00012656678,0.0017703113,0.00012562351,0.20279582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57428837,0.054381724,0.012906523,0.23822215,0.003593256,0.00015368825,0.0012838065,0.00023435106,0.11493618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852228,0.0020742735,0.00047100813,0.0014748485,0.007957148,0.0027998649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809215,0.0058517377,0.0008552807,0.00047111174,0.010460507,0.0014398802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009407118,0.0005975466,0.00083319424,0.0023079487,0.017399902,0.009630291,0.0030224249,0.0060504777,0.0072979922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031159718,0.0006011635,0.00074051373,0.003232065,0.02511686,0.0036942777,0.0022795158,0.008211791,0.00073029596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028797433,0.000011161638,0.00375514,0.00036874533,0.000037671,0.0003744233,0.004176992,0.00024400998,0.0001815621,0.6941153,0.2652088,0.031497404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058031794,0.000024756664,0.016609816,0.0014165123,0.00012363232,0.00016960515,0.0056771296,0.00079329323,0.0005584054,0.13093857,0.84341615,0.00021403328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99474686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99608827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16996503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16996503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3224787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9627229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529479054","doi":"","title":"Contracting Spousal Support: Thinking through Miglin","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Trilogy; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Task (project management); Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0190914880288153,"score_gpt":0.3161946277345866,"score_spread":0.2971031397057713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529479054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1959398,0.006038941,0.02940083,0.35381278,0.0005331652,0.00015731367,0.00010267726,0.00009496511,0.4139195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494371,0.001095445,0.005286978,0.03328935,0.00027514977,0.00008984468,0.000025563157,0.00003903049,0.01046161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.979151,0.008065944,0.00088869384,0.0021482995,0.0065671164,0.0031788892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98975205,0.006129764,0.0010122674,0.0007937979,0.0016938829,0.0006182888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025036976,0.00040194998,0.0007928439,0.0024926353,0.014332954,0.014703605,0.003106609,0.01294571,0.0025749847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0307708,0.0007980498,0.0006913465,0.0017333439,0.043857645,0.015114492,0.008294371,0.013227179,0.00035925698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016564645,0.0000064414853,0.0010511967,0.000014415927,0.0000044502685,0.00015920518,0.009299845,0.000104855644,0.00014409941,0.9831171,0.002477947,0.0036039646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003966687,0.000046770117,0.0030324094,0.0002984843,0.000027093725,0.00020009131,0.018373262,0.0016080296,0.00078813976,0.90209574,0.07342513,0.00006520356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13427815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18012957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13427815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040263474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020727048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29213333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530969327","doi":"10.21991/c90q1k","title":"Invalidity and Retrospectivity under the Irish and Canadian Constitutions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Legislation; Law; Statute; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science","score_opus":0.06189011535806788,"score_gpt":0.28688165926465836,"score_spread":0.22499154390659049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530969327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3117675,0.0036738103,0.008190233,0.04981841,0.00077273673,0.00017487424,0.0006048944,0.00007709255,0.6249205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834389,0.0008072264,0.0014624917,0.0026778502,0.00011869426,0.000040891024,0.00012298014,0.000039250102,0.011291758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9673478,0.0064266576,0.0015450729,0.0031996917,0.014662284,0.0068183644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95098764,0.023510957,0.0038757587,0.0035766442,0.016719975,0.0013290037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031902395,0.00027854304,0.00078358926,0.006635236,0.018036399,0.015223094,0.0027434456,0.0035614616,0.002782667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07980677,0.0005158347,0.0006160364,0.007577137,0.064467974,0.0055167694,0.006936309,0.008439643,0.00021326706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035642763,0.0000072188086,0.003088757,0.00003354445,0.000010192081,0.00025168658,0.053086523,0.00014611022,0.00016296774,0.93223846,0.0025429178,0.008395904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077231256,0.000049985654,0.032077286,0.0005932913,0.00023077069,0.000649646,0.12257202,0.0013694674,0.0019231753,0.4456829,0.39439404,0.0003801818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7927959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8192988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2072041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065598115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07466607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47594988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535042618","doi":"","title":"The merits of the civil action for Breach of Statutory Duty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Statutory law; Delict; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Political science; Duty; Common law; Legislation; Private law; Public law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.4921378471574602,"score_gpt":0.3840079217991512,"score_spread":0.10812992535830895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535042618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028709408,0.0028090407,0.010981855,0.09941463,0.0009484641,0.000079038335,0.0000678507,0.000038475708,0.8569514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407994,0.0013016005,0.004656588,0.014483188,0.0021043504,0.00023206437,0.00005549281,0.00008146646,0.036285922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95557296,0.015347358,0.0023065284,0.004723639,0.01830848,0.0037410173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599839,0.026231699,0.0024798086,0.004274487,0.0047239866,0.0023061195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032728653,0.00039459686,0.0012073755,0.00208849,0.007675689,0.014191305,0.0020803122,0.019646382,0.011464781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059338715,0.0005762387,0.000946052,0.0013188287,0.037429966,0.0140758315,0.0059008477,0.013651255,0.0019455364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020521913,0.000012152434,0.00020342018,0.000013726573,0.0000043273762,0.00003440063,0.00034848996,0.000076392855,0.000058697973,0.994111,0.0015394432,0.003577465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051758034,0.000069635826,0.0022234195,0.00022263241,0.000039023922,0.00024033837,0.0015541723,0.0011302617,0.0004028028,0.91389793,0.08012666,0.00004143787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005884805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076887645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032728653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078057484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012133005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17308778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535503060","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom020009","title":"Contracts and Contracting","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Damages; Breach of contract; Bargaining power; Order (exchange); Frustration of purpose; Law and economics; Business; Privity of contract; Severability; Exclusion clause; Power (physics); Contract management; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.016238110375378523,"score_gpt":0.29188241824506356,"score_spread":0.275644307869685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535503060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049275523,0.028297534,0.06815045,0.035319198,0.0010095468,0.00022069218,0.0004801394,0.00011000582,0.86148494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.639153,0.063133836,0.058833815,0.01387595,0.003619715,0.0012633288,0.0010721292,0.0002673303,0.21878093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98554385,0.007581636,0.0010422801,0.0015624351,0.0034171138,0.0008526734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879574,0.00767814,0.0011412537,0.0013149116,0.0014018918,0.0005064971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01004266,0.0008145925,0.0011079621,0.0022544134,0.0046460205,0.010949281,0.0015909335,0.0063975197,0.023540176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016845671,0.00046050604,0.0006439117,0.0060323444,0.026322836,0.0088480655,0.0050098416,0.005655426,0.0033271208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001047134,0.0000020794898,0.000023099583,0.00001745698,9.714357e-7,0.000013033565,0.00010375079,0.00011826258,0.0000064258984,0.9963612,0.0016966591,0.0016558645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035717896,0.0000040505033,0.000044895507,0.00013527668,0.0000015652059,0.000044682878,0.00014754852,0.00029648282,0.000022212134,0.9354906,0.06380489,0.0000042051583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064898375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029905534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023540176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009345515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007918331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07874972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535505803","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2757","title":"The Justice in Unjust Enrichment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Economics","score_opus":0.020685090510327457,"score_gpt":0.3160886434278146,"score_spread":0.29540355291748716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535505803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043527234,0.008329516,0.04439495,0.12868488,0.0009487238,0.000098128054,0.000064691325,0.00011357852,0.7738384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393251,0.0017584374,0.004905911,0.018608881,0.00073432195,0.00012418094,0.000027406208,0.00008963127,0.034426104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899782,0.0043688337,0.0003373929,0.0015390251,0.0023007705,0.0014757706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945181,0.003155945,0.00042545388,0.000853227,0.00065319584,0.00039397427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007491826,0.0004410292,0.0007211029,0.0012724742,0.0092664985,0.010108149,0.0011577709,0.006959187,0.00428461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014572091,0.00040115087,0.00064889994,0.00087187055,0.0631739,0.0109917,0.0079826955,0.008015371,0.0005920164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033376234,0.000005447214,0.00009333439,0.000008596125,0.0000015193928,0.000020495203,0.0004978144,0.00007179712,0.000026817037,0.9965469,0.0009992857,0.001724594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008161857,0.000008308688,0.00026057896,0.000058466976,0.0000047949247,0.000036308546,0.00047749013,0.00019949849,0.00011788508,0.9713458,0.027474761,0.000007927389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00900265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006444135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010108149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006788202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007571083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049252152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535992387","doi":"","title":"Romalpa Agreements Post-PPSA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Personal property; Property (philosophy); Business; Realisation; Uniform Commercial Code; Law; Law and economics; Point (geometry); Civil code; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.036864900978598875,"score_gpt":0.2709809771840304,"score_spread":0.23411607620543154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535992387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0195039,0.00040586983,0.0048763617,0.0063024545,0.00036152368,0.00017108701,0.00044061628,0.00030186,0.9676362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3551454,0.00050196087,0.0057599787,0.006094734,0.00023983106,0.00028784943,0.0004230709,0.00012841787,0.6314187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931083,0.001262378,0.00026156654,0.0010593183,0.0031976562,0.0011107852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650806,0.0010194262,0.00024218248,0.00072103954,0.0012995643,0.00020961867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004334092,0.00032857707,0.0003796456,0.0009128955,0.005417835,0.0049234964,0.0016539838,0.004176205,0.021519333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014347445,0.00038057182,0.00074813457,0.0012401573,0.0036029217,0.002832966,0.0041438383,0.005005791,0.005499215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019269914,0.000024200932,0.00039405248,0.0000705997,0.000007231305,0.00034287138,0.0029713542,0.00020590615,0.00031621227,0.9490415,0.026782347,0.019824497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012672043,0.000048602302,0.0028222096,0.0001468221,0.000017894168,0.0005130698,0.0013294807,0.0007126666,0.0011430167,0.038864225,0.9543481,0.000041194144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10999264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12702756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10999264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009264813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01741025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21870482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536910408","doi":"","title":"Unfamiliar Waters: Negligent Advocates, Egregious Errors and Lost Chances of Acquittal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Misrepresentation; Causation; Conviction; Law; Damages; Political science; Law and economics; Excuse; Criminology; Duty; Collusion; Criminal law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.011854398407600776,"score_gpt":0.28485799224114416,"score_spread":0.2730035938335434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536910408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30149457,0.0044090697,0.024245838,0.16750598,0.0005039762,0.0002599326,0.000048071557,0.00006248666,0.50147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800919,0.0005095214,0.0015828125,0.0053374907,0.00014090781,0.000059645117,0.0000048139636,0.000011250065,0.012261761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98828983,0.0050748093,0.00037542795,0.0008401118,0.0033763552,0.0020434225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856065,0.008693198,0.0023971256,0.0006811185,0.0012789047,0.0013432032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01061714,0.0002871066,0.0005712,0.0015622079,0.009829633,0.008179264,0.001810318,0.013461455,0.005690789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047292944,0.00044645305,0.00040615862,0.00088415557,0.0412598,0.009943044,0.010587428,0.0086823115,0.0004638362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022823308,0.00003379019,0.0033920638,0.000026452053,0.000008144058,0.0029136566,0.01936483,0.0004357571,0.000107874526,0.9628889,0.0026765638,0.00812914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049875158,0.000086427084,0.004458501,0.00029640953,0.000040670213,0.0027259262,0.027897488,0.0017743676,0.00035915867,0.9165665,0.045672588,0.0000720675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037950132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056532096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037950132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007874177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013989117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07545847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538231396","doi":"","title":"From testamentary freedom to testamentary duty: Finding the balance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queensland University of Technology","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Bequest; Probate; Legislation; Settlor; Law; Paternalism; Duty; Balance (ability); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.021110256498124265,"score_gpt":0.24935193738844885,"score_spread":0.2282416808903246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538231396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05044328,0.021127807,0.02599349,0.51081455,0.0018291618,0.00009455963,0.00007691031,0.000050504193,0.38956973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266259,0.006379277,0.005494151,0.04027461,0.0017910304,0.0001405777,0.00003747146,0.000070086266,0.019186847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98032856,0.009198414,0.0008106234,0.0019525493,0.004966343,0.0027434912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724415,0.019702686,0.0018502772,0.0014655524,0.002400991,0.0021389567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026369233,0.0005019215,0.0014409573,0.0034829178,0.009935359,0.019028028,0.0032637566,0.011718833,0.0063275783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04484484,0.0006432548,0.0008280725,0.0028084246,0.1108668,0.032554068,0.019291822,0.018109372,0.0006070221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065166805,0.00000881315,0.00025896364,0.000035623343,0.000002667166,0.000042944554,0.0024889198,0.000065667984,0.000023939177,0.9885434,0.002018099,0.006504527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012432758,0.000016805165,0.00073954085,0.00056719006,0.0000050001026,0.00008249592,0.005372701,0.00030055302,0.000069052265,0.9378446,0.05496827,0.000021379117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018117387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016858825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026369233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016445091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015562184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1394555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539543202","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Ownership and the Relativity of Title","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Reductionism; Theory of relativity; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theoretical physics; Physics","score_opus":0.026187585977406502,"score_gpt":0.27619567259279454,"score_spread":0.25000808661538804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539543202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074606895,0.015341967,0.13630863,0.06364192,0.0023589057,0.00008126293,0.00034757613,0.00026855964,0.7070442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95418125,0.0043158573,0.013071502,0.0030489068,0.0020417825,0.00010725312,0.0001284945,0.00013306623,0.022971949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895607,0.005198113,0.0005450112,0.0016518696,0.0022634629,0.00078083435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876518,0.0060198787,0.0018658142,0.0027161213,0.0011527668,0.00059364905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009591203,0.00034026094,0.00076565816,0.0029434706,0.0042198296,0.008875729,0.0016462753,0.0032448575,0.006415807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017016428,0.00061636674,0.0008348615,0.0024771765,0.04479741,0.029181385,0.006360406,0.005193087,0.000956761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030398674,0.0000015715359,0.00008351285,0.0000087314,0.0000016906587,0.000010639575,0.00066709594,0.00003108484,0.00002451469,0.99770206,0.00032985368,0.0011363869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012858875,0.00001848354,0.0004299237,0.0000878123,0.0000133592475,0.00012635387,0.0007477008,0.00021579598,0.0001842071,0.9492739,0.048871867,0.000017808976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022727286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013557413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009591203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045033665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023836223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05072373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541056688","doi":"10.4324/9780203024393","title":"British System of Government","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013848788214565491,"score_gpt":0.24756899966843388,"score_spread":0.2337202114538684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541056688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007773878,0.006678002,0.00038216574,0.0050273873,0.0011854427,0.00001659234,0.0005969734,0.00012545781,0.9852107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021355134,0.003662652,0.00055631384,0.001239763,0.00017168386,0.000035939698,0.00042010396,0.000085001346,0.97247326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816555,0.00025447464,0.000094466726,0.00028691356,0.0009314324,0.00026711932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937505,0.00008829231,0.00002915756,0.000093055554,0.00032815366,0.00008639849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006044143,0.00042284618,0.0004181773,0.0014607746,0.0047123316,0.008622177,0.0007302893,0.0020312634,0.05594967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002072984,0.00033669636,0.00019577866,0.003372156,0.0023617889,0.0021874863,0.0014268762,0.0024533,0.018885866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000725669,0.000004967006,0.00008900775,0.000080786296,0.0000028721179,0.000043791162,0.0008306208,0.000089289846,0.000064905806,0.48397025,0.4801332,0.034683123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.580375e-7,0.0000015987185,0.00019322998,0.00003225451,7.868872e-7,0.000021839132,0.00010446806,0.000021585727,0.000012985838,0.0053319675,0.994276,0.0000024935923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21467514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35621595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21467514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01631892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01132943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42685115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541220344","doi":"","title":"Common Law and Equity in R3RUE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Equity (law); Common law; Restitution; Impossibility; Law and economics; Political science; Constructive; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10784921213275266,"score_gpt":0.38684703310390206,"score_spread":0.2789978209711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541220344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033680767,0.015429722,0.028478764,0.087263905,0.0011300673,0.000101411235,0.000085318185,0.00012092254,0.83370906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8796034,0.0026871436,0.004472011,0.023228692,0.0011171005,0.00015163983,0.000046515277,0.000114418894,0.08857899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853731,0.008129098,0.00052990287,0.0015779564,0.0023301162,0.0020598692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491936,0.003259013,0.0003273533,0.0005606191,0.0007057846,0.00022787222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010488344,0.00037869404,0.0006447045,0.0012786449,0.006115824,0.012503381,0.0013126164,0.007906001,0.004748446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012435621,0.00033902013,0.00074416614,0.0010870628,0.026511904,0.008864926,0.006027303,0.009419363,0.00076591276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014738085,0.0000017652019,0.000023665601,0.0000037783366,5.0961006e-7,0.000015983791,0.00047903036,0.000029443188,0.000013881437,0.99760383,0.00085859536,0.00096811337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102054755,0.000027332373,0.0004294618,0.0001517706,0.0000057740126,0.00008326318,0.0012165513,0.00043245027,0.00031706278,0.8408471,0.15645175,0.000027237633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019872703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015248084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019872703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010280948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005700867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0745939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541760580","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2756","title":"Consideration Which Happens to Fail","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Expansive; Unjust enrichment; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Database transaction; Business; Order (exchange); Political science; Economics; Computer science; History; Finance","score_opus":0.02449982162249849,"score_gpt":0.3135928926971125,"score_spread":0.289093071074614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541760580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03920073,0.0035261028,0.013984813,0.2429215,0.0026147342,0.00009441111,0.00008436687,0.00017085864,0.69740254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8852764,0.0010009882,0.0014883748,0.06665466,0.0013043201,0.00013056923,0.00004748603,0.00026790093,0.043829452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96503466,0.013504104,0.0011525804,0.004745905,0.0075057326,0.008057046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774219,0.012519007,0.0013016018,0.0022500143,0.0045323563,0.0019751827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020489344,0.00055248814,0.00073785457,0.0011764998,0.01693894,0.011832194,0.0025956798,0.015349089,0.008966239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04674038,0.0004988394,0.0013410106,0.00087446766,0.048110362,0.012776112,0.009289838,0.016688248,0.0015627487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015239101,0.000010748604,0.0005840625,0.000029253953,0.0000067796545,0.00063418434,0.014647714,0.00007116718,0.000109698616,0.95874405,0.020739459,0.0044075204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001965289,0.000030348207,0.00097053946,0.00033038898,0.00002467019,0.0005068779,0.022005184,0.00048154726,0.00046763566,0.61042666,0.3646738,0.00006269086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03997822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029783025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03997822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0132502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016727667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10835934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541803598","doi":"10.1108/17561450911001243","title":"Legal incoherence and the extra‐constitutional law of regulatory takings","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Law; Jurisprudence; Common law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Political science; Private law; Property law; Public law; Economics; Sociology; Property rights","score_opus":0.022114634204567184,"score_gpt":0.3012256096318854,"score_spread":0.2791109754273182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541803598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28630322,0.004944703,0.04847372,0.07573973,0.0002525894,0.00023112277,0.0002715583,0.00012689739,0.58365655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915692,0.00039637578,0.002224368,0.0017536535,0.000027375003,0.000022320251,0.000021974754,0.000017096534,0.0039675813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97667253,0.0051984657,0.0010700175,0.0023833856,0.011342701,0.0033330119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95741993,0.023488348,0.0040193815,0.0035891312,0.010404504,0.0010786613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018554464,0.00032668488,0.000492253,0.0027465743,0.017940594,0.014660411,0.0029258428,0.0036290023,0.0038213874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03913364,0.00053416996,0.00050736254,0.0038379799,0.09381635,0.006249229,0.0056262435,0.006753909,0.00018636041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074990944,0.00000735205,0.0017461736,0.00004476003,0.00000648479,0.00012646169,0.025027277,0.00034121805,0.00022919726,0.9666113,0.0009332979,0.0049189273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052040952,0.000062651605,0.027706675,0.0011169144,0.00012379173,0.00043507354,0.086541586,0.0033671444,0.002060769,0.6384736,0.23983115,0.00022875615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8532038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85931647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8532038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06336234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11366826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45972806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542585521","doi":"","title":"Simplifying Canadian Negligence Actions Against Public Authorities – Or Maybe Not","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Duty; Duty of care; Plaintiff; Res ipsa loquitur; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Business; Law and economics; Tort; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.09565155933432401,"score_gpt":0.3556480425580969,"score_spread":0.2599964832237729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542585521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14352055,0.0018818197,0.021425815,0.05151981,0.00058838475,0.0003209786,0.00038815304,0.00034730032,0.7800072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241409,0.00088715437,0.0116464915,0.006238938,0.00017975415,0.000062413535,0.00014332849,0.000040870083,0.056660067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913645,0.0007450703,0.0002898906,0.0009924688,0.0046287663,0.0019793157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632394,0.0009988202,0.0003532574,0.00073946605,0.0013401895,0.00024433492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003109428,0.00041698254,0.0005196881,0.0016214842,0.008443459,0.0055134427,0.0018935538,0.0042253514,0.006058314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013064168,0.0004995017,0.0009292645,0.0010864643,0.009584909,0.0034168456,0.005128605,0.0055217342,0.001026126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020290534,0.000031724496,0.0011632649,0.000039747134,0.000018418674,0.00024460972,0.001821611,0.002069596,0.00071156543,0.9727233,0.00894366,0.012212293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015413587,0.00017383808,0.0145046525,0.00037588994,0.0003283334,0.00057491084,0.0035189055,0.008652435,0.004888378,0.56118387,0.40540916,0.00023545405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72002405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7904418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27997595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030327449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053604435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5632496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542624731","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559152.003.0002","title":"Criminal Law as Public Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Political science; Morality; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Public law; Private law; Analogy; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12046767205899205,"score_gpt":0.32344929868005623,"score_spread":0.20298162662106417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542624731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015617717,0.010048019,0.0033621953,0.017740574,0.0005307401,0.000018614292,0.000037674192,0.000052082243,0.96664834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31653187,0.023052685,0.0033604421,0.010869013,0.0022934119,0.00017584166,0.00017844663,0.00014691084,0.64339143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918574,0.00027328837,0.000017928183,0.0001113498,0.00029954265,0.00011204924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994493,0.00027833416,0.000034023225,0.00008100612,0.00010350639,0.00005367516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072274543,0.00040906822,0.00027222311,0.0011864072,0.0028949084,0.006597377,0.0005705805,0.0029272076,0.017684767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011961237,0.00022322197,0.0002530509,0.0010397948,0.011340759,0.0047238027,0.0018859556,0.004498365,0.002327118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.1083493e-7,0.0000040983564,0.000008752646,0.0000068904765,2.3826331e-7,0.0000060940783,0.00020714295,0.000072046176,0.0000098884675,0.98969847,0.0072682262,0.0027177203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002530209,0.000004480839,0.00008468103,0.00014576028,0.0000012139961,0.000032109336,0.00030487726,0.00025643816,0.000050678755,0.47605023,0.52306384,0.000003162261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066510416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006190282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017684767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066078417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049077314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059161425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542754321","doi":"","title":"The Relationship between Rights and Remedies in Private Law: A Comparison between the Common and the Civil Law Tradition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Commonwealth; Private law; Political science; Common law; Comparative law; Public law; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.030963246201774097,"score_gpt":0.3146259206271506,"score_spread":0.2836626744253765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542754321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1541231,0.017986076,0.037423853,0.08581512,0.00038647032,0.00004567976,0.0000870185,0.00005262097,0.70408005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98796076,0.0019873073,0.0017016944,0.0012403495,0.0002550236,0.000026758442,0.000012928017,0.000027903032,0.0067871753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871279,0.006352008,0.00049789576,0.0011464289,0.0035055792,0.0013702747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98085403,0.01401899,0.0016308386,0.0017566248,0.0010824356,0.000657045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007195048,0.0002319521,0.0006325497,0.004081905,0.005886276,0.01191693,0.0013266375,0.005096096,0.0055607515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021354567,0.00033958367,0.00062988733,0.003272393,0.08643204,0.022807159,0.0076242224,0.005881169,0.00030807714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003389304,0.0000057508705,0.000116508,0.000010816748,0.0000017824356,0.000014011494,0.0027785073,0.00005321428,0.00002212375,0.99501425,0.00015548014,0.001824196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000947676,0.000018022034,0.0010734948,0.00011837408,0.000005830784,0.000052213978,0.0026936948,0.00028683257,0.000082725164,0.9744955,0.021155594,0.000008374337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010381458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011570735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01191693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009885818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057796272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07172698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542978675","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.006","title":"Trust laws in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.029372169859132588,"score_gpt":0.23963484283630657,"score_spread":0.210262672977174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542978675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12517565,0.012380881,0.0023584368,0.030371116,0.0004478199,0.00008134232,0.00024313276,0.00008378629,0.82885784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.818501,0.002918726,0.0004973066,0.0025511414,0.00017859128,0.000091453025,0.0000770321,0.000019813879,0.17516495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986565,0.00023665091,0.00006788871,0.00017050169,0.00035446524,0.00051404216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947876,0.00014842844,0.00007072233,0.000075176635,0.00013436825,0.000092508526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014184463,0.0003349236,0.0004270752,0.001202078,0.0062311203,0.003830063,0.00060216873,0.0022766232,0.0076427525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022819627,0.00029114235,0.00030907887,0.0025080792,0.0057582343,0.0024214655,0.0016808945,0.0027050467,0.00050099706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000884443,0.000011383994,0.0010417288,0.000026145248,0.000006855002,0.000097467746,0.002173849,0.0002700841,0.00004540242,0.97609997,0.011078131,0.009140169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045688335,0.000068859095,0.02194934,0.00027141903,0.000050932293,0.00014870882,0.0031064383,0.0027913572,0.00038238365,0.5113935,0.45972922,0.00006217947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13530432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14056091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13530432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012286624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020640986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26903355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547571473","doi":"","title":"Priorities Under the Land Registration Act 2002","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Meaning (existential); Land registration; Value (mathematics); Disposition; Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Geography; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Advertising; Philosophy; Social psychology; Epistemology; Statistics; Land tenure; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04075124593908199,"score_gpt":0.3323009036715741,"score_spread":0.29154965773249214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547571473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011584474,0.00050465454,0.0036246388,0.013790542,0.0010022175,0.00033969423,0.0012834913,0.00024087766,0.9676293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20086147,0.0009048155,0.011242349,0.05707507,0.0008682312,0.0010939434,0.0027845532,0.00021923376,0.7249503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806276,0.0027611873,0.0014025222,0.0017103726,0.00986792,0.003630454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359363,0.0011628804,0.00049307966,0.000647538,0.0034853092,0.00061758934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074625607,0.00045746696,0.00048075867,0.0015702553,0.0047008703,0.008880895,0.0016504147,0.0053422246,0.016149554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016868368,0.0008737302,0.00066483463,0.0015304077,0.001740595,0.004024647,0.0031487334,0.007350585,0.009582415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006250075,0.000082478575,0.0013926526,0.00008349801,0.000008430909,0.00018175432,0.002089513,0.00024342856,0.0013228173,0.7365394,0.22279648,0.035197027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040707888,0.000071768525,0.003940725,0.00013789778,0.000012711901,0.000101556376,0.00067104533,0.0002677239,0.00066839665,0.019768767,0.97426003,0.000058631656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13534606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16448987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13534606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009376627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02352257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26911652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547665210","doi":"","title":"Probate Actions and 'Suspicious Circumstances': A Third Standard of Proof for Allegations Involving Moral Guilt","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Testamentary trust; Supreme court; Probate; Context (archaeology); Law; Reasonable doubt; Balance (ability); Standard of review; Third party; Securities fraud; Hearsay; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.03587586103344151,"score_gpt":0.30853827330212513,"score_spread":0.2726624122686836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547665210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0847247,0.0068459306,0.19092299,0.25301284,0.002358121,0.0005965981,0.0006143559,0.000426205,0.4604984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181126,0.0012782854,0.037795305,0.026143074,0.00039653588,0.00021946165,0.000099373916,0.00007289818,0.015882527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.963273,0.009142726,0.0022063048,0.0029759037,0.0172139,0.0051882076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95122695,0.022940941,0.004267217,0.0053408933,0.013034871,0.0031891656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031254757,0.00070897455,0.0013039763,0.0032981373,0.008768758,0.017508367,0.0041665924,0.014855677,0.0030467499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07770377,0.0009757213,0.0016811026,0.0015488333,0.051153384,0.011509147,0.00962044,0.019196816,0.0008993496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018381108,0.000014719181,0.00093355105,0.000037980186,0.000009752287,0.0002558584,0.0028851759,0.00022493581,0.00020815902,0.9842552,0.0043977574,0.006758553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008057232,0.000079828584,0.0055401106,0.0006340886,0.00006278151,0.001086943,0.0028865328,0.0023703065,0.001822564,0.881686,0.10352585,0.00022446075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1723328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18195792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1723328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020445375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061852876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3426594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550663498","doi":"10.71781/2135","title":"La propriété des créances : approche comparative","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07183418639319442,"score_gpt":0.38164742424857095,"score_spread":0.3098132378553765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550663498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036516492,0.021251414,0.03886207,0.019569274,0.00091477076,0.00006100068,0.00014434723,0.000077730525,0.9154678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68869567,0.04281021,0.031976625,0.011140415,0.004083555,0.00081860897,0.00049557997,0.00036697075,0.21961246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929599,0.0037890808,0.00019416433,0.0009329502,0.0014502829,0.0006735802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952885,0.0022001516,0.00023974017,0.0005446573,0.0015162772,0.00021060971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072075697,0.0012503493,0.0012476852,0.008695282,0.007834129,0.012740402,0.0033552484,0.005993539,0.022011304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077292635,0.0007277449,0.0014645653,0.0062231296,0.030083027,0.015387057,0.005212094,0.008360355,0.0032118554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003514224,0.000003258431,0.00006196464,0.000031318115,0.0000044697886,0.000038094207,0.0007848544,0.00009291931,0.000019519734,0.99380255,0.002161186,0.0029962605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008539658,0.000016771837,0.0006368349,0.0005295087,0.000029104433,0.00018219628,0.002916925,0.0007538392,0.0001437777,0.67250514,0.32225293,0.000024393245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055265956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059274722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055265956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027356893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008775185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19848907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551625796","doi":"10.53300/001c.5583","title":"The Solicitor-General in context: A tri-jurisdictional study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04241980432290191,"score_gpt":0.3749907213378239,"score_spread":0.332570917014922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551625796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8864899,0.004712446,0.0016973199,0.0071927225,0.0000967349,0.00018033532,0.00018738053,0.000008148867,0.09943504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580115,0.0010929492,0.0003014469,0.00083547964,0.000032208107,0.00006060598,0.00004302217,0.0000062559016,0.001826959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915086,0.004890985,0.0002015095,0.00065138325,0.0011211565,0.0016264566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923522,0.0033133952,0.0015407794,0.00040866478,0.0011075772,0.001277318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005892021,0.0001959985,0.0006745597,0.004573656,0.013480788,0.006099233,0.0014454514,0.0024054241,0.006649259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010890261,0.00030434507,0.0003168943,0.00902842,0.012245421,0.007897654,0.010540752,0.0034738735,0.00043108215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001051313,0.00026358292,0.11245261,0.00031680064,0.00005086635,0.0022286563,0.25667316,0.00032686867,0.00054128334,0.5987558,0.0044729854,0.023812229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035245437,0.00015668919,0.09551505,0.00070608145,0.00007749046,0.0011741495,0.80898434,0.0006989936,0.00018969702,0.025562298,0.066852205,0.00004773002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14201288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3680778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14201288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009995865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011949675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2823726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552143593","doi":"","title":"Recipe for a New Tort: Recognizing a Common Law Right to Privacy in Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Tort; Political science; Common law; High Court; Denial; Jurisprudence; Law of the case; Precedent; Majority opinion; Supreme court; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Psychology","score_opus":0.05732386506477993,"score_gpt":0.31160896901036766,"score_spread":0.25428510394558773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552143593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06252309,0.0043845614,0.009812581,0.32703048,0.0011185564,0.00024345225,0.00056026416,0.00008883301,0.5942382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76364464,0.0043405034,0.012021733,0.04459727,0.00038862255,0.00014307987,0.00021361579,0.00007608516,0.17457443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99530834,0.0006311723,0.00017465021,0.00048196534,0.0021209884,0.0012828469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710196,0.000768901,0.00018044886,0.000308391,0.0010866902,0.0005536098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025501654,0.0002693479,0.0002949633,0.0007301237,0.016201518,0.006541518,0.0013249265,0.006012449,0.0051380023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065780394,0.000431876,0.00058729696,0.0010739849,0.01625621,0.004121306,0.0037508605,0.004971865,0.00052857486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002413605,0.000016270918,0.0021490422,0.000045444005,0.000010173113,0.0005408653,0.013486552,0.00026736627,0.0004944267,0.91840416,0.054620124,0.009941402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005112846,0.000025674628,0.007903589,0.00023920284,0.000043857992,0.0003166524,0.01101424,0.0008181244,0.00054802734,0.16318236,0.8157405,0.00011669128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9678333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98511606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070920974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070920974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11412473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5145701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552228707","doi":"","title":"The Priority Pitfall Problem: The Contest Between Judgment and Secured Creditors in Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Creditor; Writ; Security interest; Enforcement; Statute; Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.011265111222375437,"score_gpt":0.26778094913891715,"score_spread":0.2565158379165417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552228707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4397318,0.0024131204,0.0036945606,0.09160608,0.00050944014,0.00030039574,0.0005462274,0.00007454756,0.46112373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9318079,0.00093807536,0.0009522484,0.005194734,0.00007105429,0.000045701334,0.00009924283,0.00004551674,0.060845524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920249,0.00091200275,0.00024785238,0.00079912937,0.0022543499,0.0037617981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890238,0.0027611565,0.00063738646,0.0005368507,0.0037905937,0.0032502245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048429566,0.00026797113,0.0006538234,0.0012226944,0.044008438,0.011275128,0.0030842095,0.004790952,0.013879186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016330244,0.0007914052,0.00057149027,0.0030640038,0.0131362965,0.004505188,0.0050522597,0.0056171836,0.00058547186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037185763,0.00018282076,0.062342107,0.00023898174,0.00008879291,0.005319956,0.11903898,0.0015496803,0.0013535888,0.66097033,0.096994966,0.05154809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020378496,0.00007734089,0.085839435,0.0005079568,0.0001233323,0.0008055671,0.1771493,0.004006443,0.0009852832,0.093717106,0.6363133,0.00027117055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1747883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1747883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21071242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9571286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554224463","doi":"","title":"Conceiving of Tradition: Dynamics of Judicial Interpretation and Explanation in Native Title Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Meaning (existential); Law; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial interpretation; Common law; Judicial review; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14970468934952952,"score_gpt":0.4228201202410188,"score_spread":0.27311543089148926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554224463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32098424,0.0054821745,0.1386828,0.058743242,0.00034967076,0.00008280016,0.00009469774,0.0001548224,0.4754256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99293876,0.00035741273,0.0035363906,0.00048294105,0.00008487823,0.00002270297,0.000013282292,0.000029352159,0.002534281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98650646,0.009008793,0.00032580906,0.0010220578,0.0019766814,0.0011602172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97577965,0.018359808,0.0019823408,0.00206285,0.0013468395,0.00046841276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015645258,0.0003007574,0.00061727274,0.0021818047,0.0055792984,0.014092617,0.0023567944,0.0071484013,0.0037468388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03746883,0.00048007545,0.0007779085,0.0019867406,0.05005049,0.016701384,0.006363227,0.006826363,0.0003279555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009728297,0.0000043508217,0.0003843542,0.000011693501,0.0000036242125,0.00008633689,0.02381033,0.00038356255,0.00006724969,0.9725021,0.0003206425,0.0024158007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016290953,0.000010581766,0.0005122094,0.000076591656,0.0000068061213,0.000066103064,0.0065912358,0.0027052313,0.00009682555,0.981167,0.008734352,0.000016890306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009915458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008127626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015645258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008732782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061493567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08274096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554323398","doi":"","title":"Accountability of Public Authorities Through Contextualized Determinations of Vicarious Liability and Non-Delegable Duties","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Accountability; Work (physics); Liability; Government (linguistics); Business; Public relations; Political science; Accounting; Tort; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05800453511599765,"score_gpt":0.34722417742045925,"score_spread":0.2892196423044616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554323398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1781914,0.001232958,0.34099168,0.050932266,0.0005259642,0.0006367182,0.000325459,0.0004032117,0.4267604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867383,0.0001318475,0.009677683,0.00052820495,0.00006196192,0.00008919181,0.00002370675,0.000032984764,0.0027160028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95328665,0.027706763,0.0021996377,0.005350391,0.0066779857,0.004778601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92293894,0.044729494,0.008582425,0.013264766,0.008453861,0.0020305158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03757727,0.00057655596,0.0011508453,0.0017823755,0.0058904323,0.014737259,0.0027805017,0.0071904035,0.0062813363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10880184,0.00090711145,0.0010001546,0.0011477874,0.02698909,0.015160088,0.009565853,0.008725602,0.0006418099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000415504,0.000030355173,0.0011203762,0.000046886777,0.00002205185,0.00009136621,0.0036534898,0.003005233,0.00024136544,0.98328847,0.0012275999,0.007231296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021442715,0.00002459953,0.0010662182,0.00010381165,0.000031341544,0.000033639062,0.0014033718,0.004533282,0.0005231949,0.98591644,0.0063100294,0.00003257917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012994492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021927567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03757727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010879921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022465527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19872999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557657977","doi":"","title":"Waters' law of trusts in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Thomson/Carswell eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.014678238624895767,"score_gpt":0.25045341765565493,"score_spread":0.23577517903075917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557657977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021099076,0.0053298753,0.0038584846,0.039521787,0.00040250793,0.00010635374,0.0004420107,0.0000724451,0.9291675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56330407,0.0041358825,0.0020882806,0.008159572,0.00021870242,0.00011975199,0.00014045733,0.00009021845,0.42174298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476916,0.00048112348,0.00013751305,0.00044975543,0.0022417153,0.0019206583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653083,0.00067100005,0.00016083856,0.00018127491,0.0017720535,0.0006839414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020795304,0.00051243516,0.0005950851,0.0019225103,0.016895616,0.012886182,0.0022688673,0.0078024734,0.011592542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011057218,0.0008722246,0.00062062487,0.0036087052,0.01189599,0.0039973287,0.00332569,0.0070906016,0.0008490401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004215656,0.0000037522148,0.0002357734,0.000009033912,0.0000030578021,0.00004842208,0.0007437039,0.00023537486,0.00001595349,0.9738491,0.02174841,0.003103248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003297504,0.000013729443,0.0037260593,0.00033267282,0.000044995435,0.0001229528,0.0037285956,0.0020352704,0.00019643211,0.39349893,0.59615535,0.00011209018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9888264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10465824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10465824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15280034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7593522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559189301","doi":"","title":"Nor-Man Regional Health Authority: Labour Arbitration, Questions of General Law and the Challenge of Legal Centrism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Arbitration; Statutory law; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Standard of review; Estoppel; Statute; Doctrine","score_opus":0.02630105219052449,"score_gpt":0.30147971939604495,"score_spread":0.2751786672055205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559189301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01444731,0.031501163,0.0025129004,0.85258615,0.00237903,0.00015177841,0.000114097755,0.000055483906,0.09625205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35590383,0.01772952,0.005716138,0.48009145,0.004161066,0.000292275,0.00008542473,0.00011204939,0.13590825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792851,0.0073447353,0.0007461807,0.0022385186,0.0061733406,0.0042121834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97485524,0.014123572,0.00089402846,0.0008321754,0.0071216235,0.0021734321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030714689,0.00045146857,0.00087922957,0.0013790946,0.021998087,0.015067271,0.005674327,0.024358364,0.005474405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03434878,0.00093183963,0.0009923909,0.0020790189,0.028761726,0.004563143,0.0042360905,0.019675825,0.00077031925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002633594,0.00003459612,0.0014092493,0.00018129768,0.000032627715,0.0012634904,0.012071377,0.0003815687,0.0005236523,0.85672146,0.117614895,0.009739426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089042245,0.000052712032,0.0063960133,0.0011805815,0.00007249238,0.000388108,0.018411038,0.0012274139,0.0006942131,0.09338904,0.87794316,0.00015608007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8924575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93558806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107542515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067225926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18155536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48776048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559970500","doi":"","title":"'Fully Appreciating' the Ontario Court of Appeal’s Views on the Summary Judgment Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Summary judgment; Political science; High Court; Psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05110731980614478,"score_gpt":0.2785294206404173,"score_spread":0.22742210083427253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559970500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016765667,0.0043379776,0.0062766084,0.5917874,0.0049852193,0.00021761171,0.0012323483,0.00020351051,0.37419352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43485856,0.0028931266,0.011705272,0.3604668,0.004111613,0.00025644532,0.00047628934,0.00020164436,0.18503024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699196,0.0033086443,0.0018187611,0.0025228048,0.016026689,0.0064034807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97416025,0.007436007,0.00097419124,0.0010420196,0.014004081,0.002383358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020352356,0.00057827606,0.0009039156,0.0013842771,0.015805688,0.01509848,0.0059555727,0.021871952,0.005401938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055769637,0.00094523706,0.0011871584,0.0016891412,0.012907799,0.005333351,0.0031039845,0.018033309,0.0012897071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005436857,0.000017000617,0.0019801345,0.0001198355,0.00003983957,0.00063063414,0.009973779,0.00037779365,0.0007959485,0.44483274,0.52993983,0.011238105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070253125,0.000028241986,0.0061335354,0.0003613113,0.00007993433,0.00016745555,0.0035950977,0.0008299536,0.00054278836,0.057147916,0.9308147,0.00022889966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94832563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94832563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056369647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.118310094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40899235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560107499","doi":"","title":"Regulatory Takings in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Property rights; Law; Presumption; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Statute; Business; Law and economics; Remuneration; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.019803160174076163,"score_gpt":0.2561516675635832,"score_spread":0.23634850738950705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560107499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1013305,0.011774475,0.0031866145,0.10580961,0.00090393896,0.00016271522,0.0009680594,0.0002023462,0.77566165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84848034,0.006639498,0.0029167398,0.028905889,0.00021176784,0.000065729306,0.00031411106,0.00007537691,0.11239047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918773,0.00049298734,0.00021487221,0.0009588592,0.003966468,0.0024894478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187976,0.0017523393,0.00046908626,0.00029861784,0.0039742514,0.0016259658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037100278,0.0003079673,0.00041300023,0.0023452276,0.02364063,0.008044188,0.0018357795,0.0034779268,0.009402849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009049887,0.0005302641,0.0006349249,0.003017394,0.011146378,0.0016604079,0.0030265872,0.00489619,0.00037331416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029147814,0.0000354073,0.005100227,0.00014095023,0.000023079907,0.0005575367,0.007647142,0.00089078787,0.0006769135,0.870228,0.07917323,0.035497703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004295346,0.000038030816,0.0240327,0.00053445913,0.0000841657,0.00022501154,0.005459751,0.0012674757,0.00089545577,0.04584149,0.92139596,0.00018259215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16937724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16937724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32304555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96340466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560729052","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006263","title":"To punish or not punish: a comparative analysis of the legislative treatment of exemplary damages in Commonwealth jurisdictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Commonwealth; Legislature; Legislation; Political science; Law; Intellectual property; Common law; Business","score_opus":0.08846968357664861,"score_gpt":0.4150822134370851,"score_spread":0.32661252986043654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560729052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68586713,0.012354847,0.0042426367,0.011579598,0.00028089693,0.0003743202,0.00021120449,0.00004700522,0.28504235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989678,0.002552712,0.00086039735,0.0023811816,0.00007174424,0.00018227332,0.00006162139,0.000029179088,0.0041829376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9515143,0.021517862,0.0024914648,0.0023145569,0.015360636,0.00680118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90511817,0.06273894,0.015414839,0.0030659896,0.011527907,0.0021342214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03214131,0.00029794112,0.0008342699,0.0064351475,0.008142504,0.0065635713,0.0028773875,0.0038912448,0.005629694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10278505,0.0006628108,0.0011282664,0.006694715,0.015299636,0.0051418985,0.0062937452,0.0050994726,0.00033100144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005789711,0.0005251196,0.055052508,0.0016888467,0.00046258274,0.002976096,0.20257118,0.0022724965,0.0022159442,0.6197996,0.012920877,0.09893573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014970747,0.001116396,0.6819546,0.0047567207,0.0008311738,0.0019367703,0.1376496,0.0025915776,0.001971539,0.024459288,0.14221169,0.0003709436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09217892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19212009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09217892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019004624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015452972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18328476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561300116","doi":"","title":"The Lamer Legacy for Judicial Independence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Commission; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Context (archaeology); Law; Charter; Government (linguistics); Judicial opinion; Independence (probability theory); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01407192240472662,"score_gpt":0.3235943973531767,"score_spread":0.3095224749484501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561300116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056728185,0.01127015,0.005975784,0.35461894,0.0040249447,0.0000664151,0.00036461971,0.00018433532,0.61782193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37597343,0.013832792,0.009641555,0.23456137,0.008555486,0.00021692629,0.0005008264,0.0004002794,0.35631737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9681484,0.0035818773,0.0007281999,0.00405906,0.01759041,0.0058920016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97873265,0.0052033905,0.00079928874,0.0024628046,0.009387532,0.0034143645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017817719,0.0005748599,0.0007748611,0.0027828112,0.02344074,0.018973242,0.0036872467,0.011282376,0.013648886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038664732,0.0009054435,0.00090898277,0.002405915,0.03263471,0.0071015307,0.007669238,0.03355379,0.0025374673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059855847,0.000007730956,0.00016647608,0.000019064391,0.0000053216027,0.000033542183,0.000601068,0.00007067074,0.000037823243,0.8948764,0.097541764,0.006634215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003129365,0.000009236325,0.0012424438,0.00027943804,0.000018546869,0.00005032166,0.0006205892,0.0003126184,0.00018264874,0.16683574,0.8303678,0.000049276776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7709116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8195128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7709116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08459879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16442584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61381006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561659932","doi":"","title":"Describing Dishonest Means: The Implications of Seeing 'Dishonesty' as a Course of Conduct or Mental Element and the Parallels with Indecency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Dishonesty; Element (criminal law); Supreme court; Law; Parallels; Mental state; Political science; Exposition (narrative); Psychology; Criminal law; Engineering; Literature","score_opus":0.029397730696960882,"score_gpt":0.3203511789294084,"score_spread":0.2909534482324475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561659932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14523223,0.011246256,0.044707302,0.10600048,0.0006570604,0.00010350027,0.000114330236,0.000034489316,0.6919043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97892684,0.0017746157,0.002710044,0.0042969673,0.00018096954,0.00005429925,0.000015669099,0.000022849492,0.012017692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98803353,0.0065780664,0.0002945728,0.0006419413,0.0032359513,0.0012159365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889204,0.007823201,0.0012357925,0.0007320408,0.00082214555,0.00046635544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073184744,0.0006981731,0.0006736687,0.0025603888,0.0069698426,0.009463329,0.0022096627,0.0058843396,0.0022627832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012270472,0.0004513911,0.0005571003,0.002164048,0.10099942,0.010432546,0.008139443,0.010856869,0.0002638562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021730552,0.0000039262804,0.00021117688,0.000014340237,0.0000018355572,0.00008165855,0.009602034,0.00009142577,0.000036404344,0.9884759,0.0003836944,0.0010955048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005370552,0.00001952889,0.0026375258,0.00019029307,0.000008132774,0.00025925925,0.011700094,0.000658302,0.00018690956,0.95201695,0.032284357,0.00003331643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050808523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055128764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050808523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012293836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008242468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10102558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W156214791","doi":"","title":"Equitable Obligations Duties, Defences and Remedies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Relation (database); Work (physics); Business; Sociology; Engineering; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.019507025147650313,"score_gpt":0.25717242669700363,"score_spread":0.2376654015493533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W156214791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037865536,0.011298654,0.013382017,0.014332621,0.001038836,0.00011533846,0.00006801745,0.00005731791,0.95592064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2911319,0.014805568,0.014489015,0.009089848,0.0013819736,0.00038729605,0.00015539028,0.00017364325,0.6683853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922665,0.0021050205,0.00040424717,0.00056818704,0.0038783406,0.00077774056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757046,0.0010205362,0.00022648182,0.00036031794,0.0006525915,0.00016962284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045717307,0.0005842705,0.0006943693,0.0016674784,0.0043989117,0.008797631,0.0014720663,0.0043878094,0.008483478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010803182,0.00054914254,0.00044876625,0.0016142419,0.018207926,0.008561423,0.0051885587,0.0064149685,0.0026603003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018161111,0.0000064367455,0.000034359226,0.000031089592,0.0000011637351,0.00003500845,0.0016338979,0.0001141845,0.000059121874,0.97502565,0.012597388,0.010459987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004674764,0.000016077574,0.00041945942,0.00048166624,0.000004192878,0.000251833,0.0018974027,0.00034415454,0.00016506354,0.380934,0.61546016,0.0000213093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008129655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075063063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008797631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066332845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007638793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04812807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565115954","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-78954-3_8","title":"Equity Theory: Responding to the Material Exploitation of the Vulnerable but Capable","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Paternalism; Equity (law); Psychology; Normative; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0635847521268799,"score_gpt":0.3276893992245734,"score_spread":0.2641046470976935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565115954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006847099,0.0084832385,0.034958255,0.06677617,0.00096515927,0.00007327368,0.000058361242,0.000040589406,0.88179773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64270306,0.010143933,0.015302782,0.019922193,0.0022483822,0.0004228579,0.00007477744,0.00015633261,0.3090257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786794,0.001038278,0.00004054538,0.0002103857,0.0005508587,0.00029191867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983181,0.0011437151,0.000106443214,0.00013337762,0.00017753035,0.00012086492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037567092,0.00074148114,0.00054510805,0.0013947715,0.004164741,0.0065775,0.001698381,0.0062705474,0.011740844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044368897,0.0002947317,0.0003669733,0.0012007218,0.03642695,0.009283358,0.004523937,0.0066618556,0.001010001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.41109e-7,0.000002832615,0.000017125642,0.000006224712,5.731736e-7,0.000009581335,0.0004416898,0.000033927146,0.000012718251,0.99549073,0.0024357014,0.0015481994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022235788,0.0000032399473,0.000052000276,0.00004854235,0.0000013109072,0.00002591722,0.0005161524,0.00011835044,0.0000542235,0.9658314,0.033344205,0.0000025118572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032014893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005527078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011740844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004337534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00512237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039277017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567259740","doi":"","title":"The Division of Responsibility and the Law of Tort","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Economic Justice; Normative; Punishment (psychology); Reflective equilibrium; Focus (optics); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Social contract; Epistemology; Primary goods; Political science; Philosophy; Liability; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.008137934507150809,"score_gpt":0.29521030133738746,"score_spread":0.2870723668302366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567259740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025251137,0.019591419,0.06639484,0.08390607,0.0010351267,0.00006597089,0.00008973469,0.00007927039,0.8035863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92028594,0.005525012,0.011403938,0.009848958,0.0014706944,0.00023409011,0.000044374843,0.00007495382,0.05111195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916648,0.0035006055,0.0002951793,0.0012793501,0.0023001516,0.0009598852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969614,0.001577886,0.00039345725,0.00053233036,0.00033678228,0.00019806775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070938524,0.0006224571,0.0006770342,0.0014950503,0.0053063654,0.0068241106,0.0013614265,0.00713856,0.0049146945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008504417,0.00043191493,0.0008272109,0.0013921374,0.055545274,0.008688273,0.0053131604,0.006315346,0.001031538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014179083,0.0000016209075,0.000017282671,0.0000032513308,7.000857e-7,0.00000711733,0.00021002382,0.00006290904,0.00000746657,0.9985257,0.0004482062,0.0007142901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004766651,0.0000042847214,0.000072512536,0.000021492635,0.0000016729837,0.000020865473,0.000083858344,0.00013905721,0.000021728838,0.98137456,0.018251853,0.0000033996782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064308713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039349436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071906247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071906247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064679375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052171886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571940683","doi":"","title":"Competing Notions of Fairness: A Principled Approach to the Intersection of Insolvency Law and Family Property Law in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Law; Family law; Creditor; Business; Real property; Trust law; Debt; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.027388302005392978,"score_gpt":0.24305004118621962,"score_spread":0.21566173918082665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571940683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042322047,0.006998405,0.081826806,0.10007819,0.00048733214,0.000472516,0.00023814995,0.000080047255,0.7674965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93145114,0.0028607133,0.029735252,0.007733828,0.00029789348,0.00027840523,0.00006100198,0.00005286375,0.02752894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809684,0.0063130674,0.00048441652,0.001487352,0.0065396633,0.004207122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879368,0.0061242166,0.0005037359,0.00059187174,0.003857097,0.0009862897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015450846,0.00055494334,0.0012234814,0.0031614976,0.026747093,0.018503617,0.0049788575,0.007615349,0.0038005223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020151155,0.0007829164,0.0012339384,0.004256672,0.05432417,0.0068787755,0.0069221994,0.009589464,0.0002428549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022710753,0.0000029390148,0.00013852995,0.00000766964,0.0000026599437,0.00005204697,0.0019466337,0.00036493328,0.000014946474,0.99546826,0.00078934396,0.0012097262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024246854,0.000009976583,0.0010851116,0.000180952,0.000028318562,0.000060426297,0.004325443,0.0047055874,0.00010662748,0.93417996,0.055238258,0.000055037348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9448747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9413081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1504239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1504239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21591578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98538786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573013442","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n2p98","title":"Third Party Suspicion of Lack of Authority on the Part of Company Agents – A Comparative Study and a Suggested Rule","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Common law; Corporate law; Business; Agency (philosophy); Legislation; Law; Order (exchange); Database transaction; Liability; China; Commercial law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.2097412546974116,"score_gpt":0.4189091143575971,"score_spread":0.2091678596601855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573013442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81730455,0.009954945,0.0013139556,0.005192297,0.000106891806,0.00011905688,0.000081028156,0.0000048608827,0.16592243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282056,0.003406811,0.00028156198,0.00038021003,0.00004824824,0.000020636844,0.000044174103,0.0000032689493,0.0029944777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913906,0.004961038,0.0005636264,0.00057909713,0.0015340742,0.0009715182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819095,0.010693162,0.0030468665,0.0008793543,0.0029768154,0.00049430504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010319232,0.0002412735,0.0005467323,0.0036245843,0.0044381833,0.006584093,0.0012559455,0.0018793152,0.0071625314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0183491,0.00027027217,0.000858892,0.005192747,0.007408948,0.0072595193,0.003008864,0.0018116918,0.00057943637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031419736,0.00047017238,0.13550428,0.0009903159,0.00015137708,0.012495984,0.3434866,0.0002365542,0.0005531728,0.43787903,0.0049345125,0.06298372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004135786,0.0005451275,0.27001378,0.0026927518,0.00030179552,0.006063556,0.61235106,0.0010529296,0.00082552515,0.017910294,0.08812129,0.000080558966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039701737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037207328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039701737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008432392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003973919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078941286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573251718","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v2i1.165","title":"Domestic Contribution and Constructive Trusts: The Canadian Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Constructive trust; Perspective (graphical); Law; Constructive; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018822179042893485,"score_gpt":0.32668791602850183,"score_spread":0.3078657369856084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573251718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028349677,0.017694464,0.004187448,0.16415994,0.00055352226,0.00004342181,0.00016568185,0.000027892102,0.784818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93776166,0.015609823,0.0015269314,0.0093128225,0.0003956359,0.000043858454,0.00005702606,0.000035884274,0.035256397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98937166,0.0023281917,0.00019122064,0.0007608491,0.0035713748,0.003776681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857196,0.0038834175,0.000727726,0.0004970856,0.005423991,0.003748126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063845655,0.0008902433,0.0010166425,0.005604368,0.026716646,0.020250598,0.003305431,0.009587001,0.009856513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127143245,0.0005683857,0.0006957617,0.0081856605,0.04932764,0.009469285,0.006859495,0.008028629,0.00049458107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005739461,0.000008395865,0.00033344474,0.00002316716,0.000003900022,0.00008467263,0.0044158753,0.00019543742,0.000016705322,0.9871049,0.0049106334,0.0028971217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004141876,0.000017531118,0.005897652,0.0007604408,0.000054797834,0.00024631305,0.036891505,0.0012946129,0.00009184457,0.6910166,0.26356405,0.00012321849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97696006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98082834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16669539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16669539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18749784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96651524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573345140","doi":"","title":"Troubled Foundations for Private Law: A Review Essay of 'The Foundations of Private Law' by James Gordley","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Law; Tort; Comparative law; Unjust enrichment; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Philosophy of law; Scholarship; Public law; Commercial law; Property law; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Property rights; Liability; Restitution","score_opus":0.04135528012109518,"score_gpt":0.3713544855114989,"score_spread":0.3299992053904037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573345140","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013923792,0.779652,0.0010147183,0.18571949,0.005460433,0.00000987606,0.000037352955,0.00001943394,0.026694372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06586888,0.8298429,0.0013343187,0.063630745,0.018167026,0.00006649679,0.000112937516,0.000103237,0.020873414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675983,0.0014151586,0.000114085226,0.00034841895,0.0009839908,0.0003785989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99401903,0.004460431,0.000255739,0.00020052865,0.00075384753,0.00031041665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036849126,0.0005458505,0.0010219188,0.0033904116,0.0044982196,0.010239088,0.0013655456,0.006087447,0.0041362066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008501338,0.00056511624,0.0005831048,0.004373138,0.016165957,0.014271719,0.00456461,0.009651452,0.0012543758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018248318,0.00004459935,0.00024409509,0.00072827906,0.000014364965,0.00014557054,0.005705492,0.00026773752,0.000097149896,0.58732754,0.3632414,0.042165536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008421809,0.0000102908825,0.0006495908,0.0021670142,0.0000057198126,0.00015135645,0.0019967605,0.000109595254,0.00004500333,0.07023071,0.92460436,0.000021049973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020107351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014573783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020107351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011050076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010703686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08017427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157384352","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1379","title":"The Constitutionalization of Quebec Libel Law, 1848-2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019067218228317348,"score_gpt":0.29376660022243856,"score_spread":0.2746993819941212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157384352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21220265,0.019403743,0.0030048955,0.050602306,0.00096039986,0.00027734754,0.0040478813,0.00022423734,0.70927656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6887268,0.0035235658,0.0022184704,0.010939874,0.000119964374,0.00014868438,0.0006205812,0.000042761723,0.29365936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977189,0.00021795795,0.00005159773,0.0002641034,0.0009721248,0.0007753648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998376,0.0003503518,0.00010198628,0.00007770466,0.00088633207,0.00020758586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001583835,0.00030963658,0.00026204862,0.0018931573,0.012984649,0.007333056,0.0014717045,0.0033758727,0.008112897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00516856,0.00051888503,0.00030726258,0.0018673287,0.007826416,0.0013598994,0.0013350835,0.0039224285,0.00038784754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087277585,0.00005734934,0.007122931,0.00010008361,0.000022973089,0.0006983313,0.010276152,0.0009963887,0.000933748,0.86577266,0.08364781,0.03028424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049660066,0.000036126334,0.027039776,0.00023239575,0.000025005584,0.00020377195,0.0026426949,0.0007178563,0.0013490589,0.011758609,0.95584744,0.00009747489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99158514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16348863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16348863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08489886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97023463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574549064","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Damages for Personal Injury: Is it too late to take the facts seriously?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Damages; Law; Tort; Personal injury; Hindsight bias; Appeal; Political science; Trilogy; Tort reform; Pain and suffering; Liability; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.0793071962190169,"score_gpt":0.36143818425770446,"score_spread":0.2821309880386876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574549064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008338053,0.044636767,0.0044126515,0.9082679,0.008364259,0.000032711887,0.00010091156,0.000040782415,0.025805894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36345533,0.058518596,0.010914665,0.51466876,0.030814901,0.00012071696,0.00014742643,0.00011957152,0.021240018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98688877,0.003205728,0.0010825054,0.0015051096,0.0059647323,0.0013531757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96206605,0.027328087,0.0022273262,0.0020992248,0.005198447,0.0010808121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015782198,0.0005973866,0.0010823787,0.0018788726,0.0070234123,0.012270836,0.004089738,0.020831954,0.003824469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0442467,0.00062797224,0.00084262673,0.0013331547,0.03241534,0.01946533,0.0047047427,0.03237783,0.00088685803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060893177,0.000090266665,0.0020822238,0.00043549697,0.00006589223,0.0010890539,0.0056947065,0.00057930406,0.0007031642,0.7354548,0.14852911,0.10521498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029093284,0.00007445288,0.0031806321,0.002122822,0.00007406303,0.0007097166,0.005906966,0.00044185325,0.00086473883,0.5755014,0.41096604,0.00012811525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044076152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08055884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044076152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008269767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015359153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08763921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574854168","doi":"","title":"Public Fiduciary Obligations, Political Trusts, and the Equitable Duty of Reasonableness in Administrative Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Administrative law; Law; Obligation; Private law; Duty; Public law; Political science; Discretion; Municipal law","score_opus":0.04376392451542906,"score_gpt":0.3256361915711034,"score_spread":0.28187226705567436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574854168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06393515,0.0051976955,0.06667573,0.06600595,0.0003507742,0.00015250724,0.00010750936,0.00013846034,0.79743624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97727865,0.00090480805,0.00443658,0.002171732,0.00014467418,0.000052691972,0.000026367865,0.00003414462,0.014950371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97161025,0.007522588,0.0011142783,0.0021635846,0.010254543,0.007334825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810683,0.0075446693,0.0019585495,0.0024705494,0.004964103,0.0019938634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015138618,0.00048035837,0.0007744366,0.0030264016,0.020124115,0.017264608,0.0027473476,0.0060764537,0.004286034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03320517,0.00070506346,0.000845915,0.0027648585,0.06494899,0.011057119,0.007259238,0.008154375,0.00044365576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015016301,0.0000026824753,0.000125317,0.0000046985388,0.0000013567276,0.000025162553,0.0017223625,0.000113695,0.000013807561,0.9962507,0.000370894,0.0013677728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015922142,0.000011330378,0.0020227197,0.00012055265,0.000017655562,0.000087919725,0.0032962135,0.0010260524,0.00014014044,0.93463606,0.058577124,0.000048297483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76018125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7003151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76018125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06990215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070063524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50717795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576456925","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Law’s ‘Holy Grail’: Reconciling Theory and Practice in Fiduciary Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Law; Obligation; Unjust enrichment; Holy Grail; Tort; Common law; Political science; Private law; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty; Comparative law; Restitution; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.010921864314824628,"score_gpt":0.3290009648101687,"score_spread":0.3180791004953441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576456925","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041687354,0.036149964,0.2588919,0.3335923,0.0021704352,0.00009782918,0.00004608431,0.00018747803,0.3271767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431523,0.005131239,0.031353377,0.013251933,0.0012985378,0.00018033716,0.000024403933,0.00014110806,0.0054668104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95692027,0.032123603,0.0011752758,0.002436076,0.0057084155,0.0016364183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662969,0.027111348,0.0010812576,0.0031369147,0.0017044818,0.00066899566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04583699,0.0007237821,0.0016454534,0.0048104646,0.008888835,0.01645559,0.0032248439,0.010757929,0.0018412189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04485853,0.0007992877,0.0008973009,0.0029468043,0.13119285,0.020210821,0.010195875,0.015658062,0.00051961554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013701833,0.0000038207468,0.000025491872,0.000007178562,0.0000010477985,0.000012767403,0.0012101344,0.00010253336,0.000008165669,0.9967481,0.00038660795,0.0014928479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052322653,0.000008558746,0.00004547933,0.00009388382,0.0000015610465,0.000023997944,0.00065707474,0.00054468814,0.000040643998,0.98277354,0.015797324,0.00000806268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004388524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003563672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04583699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0148309665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010083349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24241203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576461159","doi":"","title":"Methods for Enforcing Civil Judgments in Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Plaintiff; Restitution; Writ; Creditor; Enforcement; Payment; Business; Order (exchange); Law; Debt; Action (physics); Civil procedure; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0339366948458636,"score_gpt":0.3964865785408555,"score_spread":0.3625498836949919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576461159","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077510454,0.0011279492,0.4697195,0.008993049,0.0002905002,0.0054820636,0.0028148904,0.0021634672,0.4318981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37108937,0.0009377188,0.4993883,0.0003741506,0.000078803045,0.002050969,0.0011746295,0.00025154388,0.124654576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891671,0.0033257802,0.0008977598,0.0014548266,0.0041278834,0.0010267533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841302,0.006545137,0.0011998914,0.0032837826,0.0041105123,0.0007303756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009152578,0.0005556361,0.0006218961,0.0029563284,0.008063052,0.0053402637,0.0032925177,0.001604313,0.02382042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027075658,0.0009673016,0.00083779177,0.00373032,0.005046441,0.0035155818,0.005929897,0.0013631021,0.0028742468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017011566,0.00023237524,0.008372807,0.0003193973,0.000043884407,0.00050331006,0.021905769,0.01007667,0.0015321072,0.67953056,0.022776676,0.2545363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030348808,0.0001477542,0.017271943,0.0005451555,0.00009891302,0.00035595638,0.015518105,0.07647187,0.0038249744,0.3457491,0.5394529,0.00025975576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7188941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8345729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28110588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035013303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053767443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5655227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579145704","doi":"","title":"Indignities: Making a Place for Human Dignity in Modern Legal Thought","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Tort; Harm; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.041657771388748925,"score_gpt":0.33409941394011833,"score_spread":0.2924416425513694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579145704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048228808,0.053220425,0.058110073,0.39887244,0.0022124653,0.0000890216,0.00006492947,0.00013877296,0.439063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370491,0.009890958,0.015839454,0.021544928,0.0012399784,0.00012164746,0.000031127744,0.000058344376,0.014224552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947114,0.0029670943,0.00023210299,0.0004940196,0.0010487009,0.0005467141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959825,0.0022942466,0.00037064854,0.0004385868,0.00041252762,0.00050151127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009850117,0.00048799667,0.0007197312,0.0022848805,0.010261282,0.010712475,0.0017835354,0.00759186,0.0019055904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008483975,0.00039658239,0.0005702529,0.0014744562,0.14241041,0.0142021105,0.008534307,0.011937734,0.00036027702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002338212,0.0000034420168,0.000057754776,0.000010891002,0.0000010524241,0.000025569349,0.00478332,0.000050662282,0.000019432573,0.9924447,0.000616368,0.0019845087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004399116,0.0000063326975,0.00008862325,0.00007220524,0.0000017921999,0.000038776456,0.0013672981,0.000094733856,0.000021683107,0.97818816,0.020108586,0.000007362167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016759297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015313017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016759297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0135514885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00977303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098323405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580558322","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2736","title":"Some “What If” Thoughts: Notes on Donoghue v Stevenson","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Greatness; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Tort; Law; Original meaning; Epistemology; Law and economics; History; Sociology; Political science; Literature; Art; Liability","score_opus":0.03042638628225194,"score_gpt":0.3090913819887659,"score_spread":0.278664995706514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580558322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005334332,0.018329734,0.00099724,0.8257132,0.013134031,0.000025140185,0.000074768745,0.000033068627,0.13635851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17321688,0.008651633,0.0009969745,0.7631932,0.009646322,0.00006136406,0.000036217025,0.00008093486,0.044116404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99146503,0.0031840813,0.00034235854,0.0013528907,0.002504811,0.0011507474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931206,0.005623589,0.00019435788,0.00017431301,0.0005237179,0.00036329107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087579675,0.0006851932,0.0005358972,0.0015465822,0.013537216,0.0080333855,0.0030347463,0.016004046,0.0034436733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017232502,0.00059834734,0.0010085434,0.0013453177,0.028536398,0.009766235,0.0041625407,0.028844185,0.0006704358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022308344,0.000016859147,0.00024242666,0.00007178656,0.000008904317,0.0008523626,0.009467345,0.00008512314,0.0001760737,0.7392328,0.24402255,0.0058015375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001705546,0.000018042267,0.0005027497,0.0006561831,0.000013599678,0.00043399463,0.008893406,0.0001706313,0.00028159938,0.15778004,0.83115864,0.00007416117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082027316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1125131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082027316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00974598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00745567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1630997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580846857","doi":"","title":"Flexibility in conflict of laws multistate tort cases: the way forward in Australia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Flexibility (engineering); Jurisdiction; Project commissioning; Jurisprudence; Test (biology); Publishing; Conflict of laws; Common law; Choice of law; Political science; Economics; Management; Liability","score_opus":0.046935396655812686,"score_gpt":0.2757558477163773,"score_spread":0.2288204510605646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580846857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7809841,0.0037989574,0.008783046,0.10465115,0.00022697853,0.0001686618,0.000043843753,0.00002767098,0.101315565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99236006,0.0006163819,0.0015534553,0.0021854383,0.000045941313,0.000030027906,0.00000832548,0.000004304276,0.003196064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98540825,0.0065604593,0.0010536421,0.0010923254,0.0030941856,0.0027912068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97359586,0.01613942,0.0030274894,0.0014688796,0.003213491,0.0025548183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020781156,0.00021590166,0.00053313485,0.0020783471,0.008216751,0.009740588,0.0025866972,0.008129518,0.002635914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036173742,0.00085891254,0.0007238963,0.0021106708,0.013070656,0.007688928,0.013301271,0.006996884,0.0001820485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021930982,0.00024389692,0.028193675,0.00038580823,0.0001012974,0.006798585,0.09449603,0.0078097903,0.0018481507,0.7648664,0.0069423635,0.08809468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002472954,0.00074739696,0.21085468,0.0034316268,0.00023952412,0.005069933,0.09255009,0.028106678,0.0026398057,0.4876526,0.16776364,0.00069668214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105319224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18782888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105319224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011413932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017752945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2094124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583608980","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.003","title":"Recognition of common law trusts in civil law jurisdictions under the Hague Trusts Convention with particular regard to the Italian experience","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.04195520688644441,"score_gpt":0.25412025290735324,"score_spread":0.21216504602090883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583608980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06406833,0.004826036,0.0011144511,0.050181255,0.0005247613,0.000036626814,0.00004651333,0.000027133157,0.87917495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86293024,0.00114629,0.0003952359,0.0067570447,0.00048051582,0.000049705788,0.000034982564,0.000034506716,0.12817141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918,0.002717337,0.00022397112,0.0006546116,0.0014791316,0.0031249675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967526,0.0015225078,0.00039834407,0.00035198661,0.00029749444,0.00067709706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006367926,0.00029522524,0.00038222029,0.0011532228,0.010456497,0.013317627,0.0013657588,0.009178204,0.004539595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008173648,0.0004400948,0.00048112776,0.002112003,0.023927353,0.0065972367,0.0066520083,0.0108389715,0.0005872096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100650395,0.000010815712,0.00039634018,0.000014224553,0.0000014536798,0.00019048166,0.033495646,0.000038233728,0.000064569685,0.9493964,0.01319365,0.003188172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034604247,0.00006308657,0.012472875,0.00035441876,0.000017116332,0.000857256,0.04387736,0.0003753729,0.00031518508,0.14210573,0.7994248,0.000102162594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102217816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1984299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102217816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01717972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0127971005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2032457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583966982","doi":"","title":"Addressing Aboriginal Land Rights in Ontario: An Analysis of Past Policies and Options for the Future - Part 1","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Deferral; Negotiation; Investment (military); Land use; Resolution (logic); Political science; Economics; Public economics; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.02355544656310162,"score_gpt":0.346499677539508,"score_spread":0.3229442309764064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583966982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7283142,0.0051678955,0.001189514,0.03142089,0.000069582624,0.00021762673,0.0008857971,0.000028301585,0.23270622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769676,0.0031580322,0.00085899903,0.00051689404,0.000019267978,0.00004067451,0.00017888084,0.000008471401,0.018251259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964755,0.0003222305,0.00009089085,0.00013096048,0.0016133266,0.0013671654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957416,0.00088030845,0.0005463036,0.00013636325,0.0019858878,0.0007096068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002049889,0.00015626535,0.00023347998,0.0018926112,0.012141129,0.0058601634,0.0014253489,0.0010797076,0.003775853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005702056,0.0001879635,0.00031220898,0.0037900996,0.005818473,0.0014649204,0.0016503902,0.0009501644,0.00014657195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001741901,0.00013198605,0.20945543,0.0007053963,0.00008032285,0.001756661,0.13149281,0.007266953,0.0018899378,0.5065557,0.030769754,0.10972088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029567336,0.00007475926,0.48131782,0.00054141635,0.0001067399,0.00024182252,0.20139064,0.0050123907,0.0005799433,0.024573203,0.2860263,0.00010532896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99735487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18131937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18131937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17536111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9495535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583969317","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004155633.i-342","title":"Re-examining Contract and Unjust Enrichment: Anglo-Canadian Perspectives (","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Law; Mistake; Common law; Breach of contract; Unconscionability; Political science; Fiduciary; Doctrine; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.03865848789430604,"score_gpt":0.31806140701663205,"score_spread":0.279402919122326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583969317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01723043,0.07053355,0.0021085138,0.23875333,0.0032369092,0.000096624644,0.000620628,0.000051827526,0.66736823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5006866,0.08264748,0.003769359,0.07068185,0.001741089,0.00020004038,0.0005203117,0.0001915575,0.33956173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264234,0.0014462051,0.00019834099,0.0006290682,0.002390083,0.0026939511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303657,0.0025064913,0.00027664777,0.0002653403,0.0028843305,0.001030589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056637446,0.0007666927,0.00070622447,0.0055313315,0.029216582,0.020021906,0.0030138332,0.00677678,0.01952528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009010422,0.00045798102,0.0005189026,0.010536058,0.0353151,0.009373199,0.004700417,0.008365424,0.0012685601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010591558,0.000014347237,0.0006521142,0.00015487129,0.0000046244486,0.00016946883,0.035397943,0.00012729624,0.00005192983,0.8456211,0.10220874,0.01558705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003860651,0.000003966348,0.0031970276,0.00073729863,0.000008621414,0.00009114504,0.056633882,0.00017169268,0.00006470515,0.04278952,0.89625853,0.000039749346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17961156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17961156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14417633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9515343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585230786","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the ‘Manner and Form’ Theory of Parliamentary Sovereignty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Parliament; Statute; Sovereignty; Popular sovereignty; Law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Commonwealth; Legislative intent; Legislation; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023017237002276952,"score_gpt":0.28055434303467786,"score_spread":0.2575371060324009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585230786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06549239,0.0059482493,0.102544956,0.036185764,0.00093419343,0.00006224865,0.00015372889,0.00008468109,0.78859395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95425624,0.0018845979,0.009599316,0.0042436444,0.0007753265,0.00008741902,0.00009752677,0.000084380496,0.02897154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917354,0.0038580443,0.00043324608,0.0011120415,0.0019050108,0.00095608423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958734,0.0022755452,0.00042901406,0.00061210693,0.0006411719,0.0001687288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060586245,0.00040224378,0.0008163945,0.0018204829,0.0036210197,0.008227055,0.0013203765,0.0035952523,0.0053066295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009224558,0.00043419714,0.0010683511,0.0011996878,0.02073058,0.012938931,0.0054790513,0.0050969836,0.00080904056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021138003,0.0000019799302,0.000077891294,0.000009284619,0.0000016114719,0.000022703549,0.0007145894,0.000087655666,0.0000319082,0.99757224,0.00031066025,0.0011673443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011256616,0.000018184097,0.0006843931,0.00007817852,0.0000106486905,0.00012551397,0.0007576437,0.0006950302,0.0001450264,0.9443316,0.053129353,0.000013104812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059144353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062726894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008227055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043902285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032423583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03204143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587368982","doi":"","title":"Misfeasance in Public Office: A Very Peculiar Tort","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Damages; Law; Political science; Recklessness; Misconduct; Harm; Public interest; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.03990089576628642,"score_gpt":0.29002236407637827,"score_spread":0.25012146831009185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587368982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.332026,0.005017262,0.104717776,0.07059122,0.0015207723,0.00019264106,0.00043755097,0.00054936274,0.4849474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93902665,0.0018910128,0.008583335,0.0070810835,0.001298829,0.00008097578,0.00010311418,0.0000826858,0.04185223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959009,0.00094747584,0.00019042996,0.00072260795,0.0014532264,0.00078525365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651223,0.0010849803,0.00047159896,0.0013358103,0.00024998898,0.0003454836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019826216,0.00038394803,0.00058772555,0.0010043982,0.0056185443,0.0066512213,0.0011320033,0.00584527,0.001911518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050811362,0.00039331548,0.00081148575,0.00092841353,0.023678185,0.008378757,0.0058160373,0.0052068406,0.0006338073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003115867,0.00005334905,0.0037280668,0.00002340202,0.00001105097,0.00075363764,0.004921431,0.00055544375,0.0007890696,0.96322733,0.009515492,0.016390571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027801396,0.00015101992,0.009987955,0.0001852487,0.00007491894,0.0075876345,0.005760564,0.0025857405,0.0024764042,0.61517495,0.35586298,0.00012487198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042601624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004392161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066512213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019987093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017146562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014501691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588607344","doi":"10.7202/043775ar","title":"NICHOLAS KASIRER et PIERRE NOREAU (dir.), Sources et instruments de justice en droit privé, Montréal, Thémis, 2002, 627 p., ISBN 2-89400-153-3.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011145665380120691,"score_gpt":0.2694879315456688,"score_spread":0.2583422661655481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588607344","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033960398,0.9022492,0.0018848825,0.03249553,0.006682132,0.000035568017,0.00083010714,0.0001571181,0.055325832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007838564,0.762253,0.0025145567,0.0029082205,0.0031328904,0.00007499587,0.000657146,0.00022208698,0.22039855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836844,0.00024701084,0.00010459457,0.00022959786,0.0008868513,0.00016345739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984347,0.00048502913,0.00020633936,0.00004124218,0.0006361686,0.00019648843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016721683,0.0018204552,0.0012637464,0.0038532636,0.002539177,0.00450106,0.001642052,0.003319423,0.06666291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003043021,0.0012354878,0.00048698758,0.0067617404,0.0016536162,0.0066036964,0.0014683036,0.0039952486,0.039204583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021577502,0.000007633662,0.00021446728,0.0005886083,0.00000975705,0.000052891482,0.00046387507,0.00007955202,0.00011769939,0.010265342,0.90221846,0.08596012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056689632,0.0000052437395,0.0012178724,0.0004268083,0.000009042441,0.00014986418,0.0004090104,0.00005148949,0.00015796721,0.0028423783,0.99470335,0.000021274931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1910792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3493754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1910792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009073827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006409603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.379934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590185570","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v3i1.168","title":"Co-ownership Trusts in the United Kingdom - The Denning Legacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constructive trust; Confusion; Constructive; Law; Kingdom; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.13440605068451353,"score_gpt":0.3858696663556629,"score_spread":0.2514636156711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590185570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44800708,0.047187835,0.003060082,0.17087144,0.0017488779,0.000064309555,0.0004931643,0.000047141006,0.32852012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736772,0.0026788854,0.00019380027,0.004792472,0.00012636479,0.000012512118,0.000033170243,0.000012641836,0.018472942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936488,0.0017699425,0.0004172816,0.0008240548,0.0011970445,0.0021427728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819365,0.007031523,0.0032163046,0.0016638838,0.0032296476,0.002922068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00360108,0.00017621809,0.00047765506,0.0010166169,0.005793566,0.010214172,0.0007123618,0.0049234475,0.009165785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018771542,0.00043934656,0.00040845526,0.0018003962,0.0067100674,0.007240862,0.005937491,0.004024859,0.00062225334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014930323,0.000045792287,0.023591114,0.00017572788,0.000051547264,0.0017718766,0.0150400875,0.00051671115,0.00016627873,0.8715729,0.05282433,0.03409426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014401415,0.00015370645,0.09312476,0.0023512288,0.00014544836,0.0026067386,0.0435397,0.0016134074,0.00044886975,0.12325199,0.73241514,0.00020501767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30462596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38123223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30462596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020236975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014307182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6057057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590258717","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498671.008","title":"Pluralism in Tort and Accident Law: Towards a Reasonable Accommodation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Accommodation; Pluralism (philosophy); Action (physics); Psychology; Evening; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0347290513566167,"score_gpt":0.256264502511724,"score_spread":0.2215354511551073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590258717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0097282445,0.008288587,0.060264118,0.049551353,0.00074044446,0.00008113456,0.00006439965,0.00009559422,0.8711861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82239497,0.0042406614,0.020700727,0.01290324,0.0016095905,0.00037972032,0.00010127008,0.0001501974,0.13751963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261296,0.0042910404,0.00031125755,0.0006776077,0.0015299813,0.00057715364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972698,0.0014653231,0.00018483847,0.0004981225,0.0003721408,0.0002097973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008047639,0.0005917566,0.00084666495,0.0014438701,0.006777463,0.008568633,0.0022609248,0.00819919,0.0059744087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076597757,0.00066536205,0.000998942,0.0012407511,0.035022102,0.012174987,0.0060808267,0.012052053,0.001204038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.513191e-7,0.0000025445452,0.000009280711,0.0000056594004,5.360709e-7,0.000007949615,0.00026462262,0.00009448729,0.0000053636522,0.9980591,0.00081964274,0.0007299299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024951728,0.0000038332964,0.000032334483,0.000030852276,0.0000010445585,0.000017700557,0.00025415458,0.0002647088,0.000012569422,0.9787048,0.020672545,0.0000028964503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074047516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057444917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008787075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008787075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057354053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063755035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590395160","doi":"","title":"Constructive appropriation - the key to constructive expropriation? Guidelines from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Appropriation; Constructive; Law; Doctrine; Law and economics; Constructive trust; Jurisprudence; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07304676549471395,"score_gpt":0.34265128982788245,"score_spread":0.2696045243331685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590395160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041444246,0.06756808,0.019937404,0.32146522,0.0020763278,0.0005071096,0.0004977335,0.0003095285,0.5834941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29653347,0.15688762,0.111527234,0.18309511,0.0011066851,0.0012687712,0.00067077193,0.0007287452,0.24818155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849871,0.0027826864,0.0015617384,0.0010122053,0.0072133043,0.0024429804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98326874,0.005085077,0.00043183184,0.00094248104,0.008733583,0.0015382845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01100035,0.0010255738,0.0010994682,0.0037352373,0.010171002,0.010442953,0.0048089717,0.0129324645,0.004757579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022894308,0.00092268025,0.00084384397,0.0039193947,0.015625479,0.0060221627,0.005247048,0.012680408,0.0014054506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017404856,0.000041569394,0.0003861766,0.0003881875,0.000008642997,0.0005202415,0.004577805,0.0009081181,0.00037639102,0.8391503,0.10304365,0.05058136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018575645,0.000012036376,0.000806269,0.001986275,0.000019378052,0.00021113109,0.0016790711,0.00040418483,0.00044306874,0.09304572,0.90128756,0.000086752705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9201989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9524294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07980108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063470215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1865712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4605108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590417720","doi":"","title":"The Problem with Pure Economic Loss","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Doctrine; Duty; Denial; Law and economics; Nothing; Set (abstract data type); Autonomy; Variety (cybernetics); Economics; Law; Liability; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010966393257720834,"score_gpt":0.22584509304892886,"score_spread":0.21487869979120802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590417720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03459225,0.008632468,0.16569206,0.19353479,0.0017080399,0.00017974681,0.00019863016,0.0004260876,0.595036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86854774,0.0050804806,0.024124173,0.028433396,0.0021134347,0.0003932038,0.000115462775,0.00035882797,0.070833296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876494,0.0034482635,0.0005845484,0.0023623398,0.0049615894,0.0009939133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99255544,0.0036959217,0.00045502186,0.0020201728,0.0009958675,0.00027752793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011532835,0.0006303447,0.0012195272,0.0012331036,0.004303144,0.009789306,0.0034610757,0.008263555,0.008143475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021362083,0.0005809053,0.0016589052,0.0007098601,0.035884224,0.01897801,0.011568924,0.016379215,0.0021791488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004280436,0.0000058368682,0.0000744545,0.000013814976,0.0000034979068,0.0000368657,0.00020970165,0.00010301555,0.00004015921,0.99509984,0.0016456665,0.0027629272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006409268,0.000011855315,0.00013978523,0.000066096654,0.0000052658243,0.00018533022,0.00023882199,0.00037477977,0.00012273308,0.97446907,0.024369387,0.000010530247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021644817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015389799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011532835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035145448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06099218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590859285","doi":"10.5040/9781474200530.ch-003","title":"Registration of Invalid Dispositions : Who Gets the Property?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051950208179005135,"score_gpt":0.27546709643865985,"score_spread":0.2235168882596547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590859285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033568528,0.016581492,0.006121982,0.094601564,0.004066629,0.000083682666,0.0004749042,0.00021608848,0.8442851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4383291,0.018960124,0.0017523211,0.0107159745,0.0026780015,0.00008109638,0.00059171556,0.000264124,0.5266275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614596,0.0014592885,0.00025476294,0.0003804963,0.0011141998,0.000645336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971812,0.0011899566,0.0004107184,0.00040694064,0.00053577544,0.00027544555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003963846,0.0002552268,0.0007523743,0.0011697571,0.0036480038,0.009860689,0.0011253362,0.0031011265,0.02387705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013786266,0.00045661855,0.00045253578,0.002450137,0.0056002853,0.011198711,0.002397285,0.0036222155,0.009234848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042376698,0.00006261007,0.0045232903,0.000098801844,0.000006642138,0.00049667107,0.010960642,0.00010746122,0.00009306267,0.6340637,0.24996272,0.099582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011810726,0.000049015864,0.0041970955,0.0006076911,0.00001542404,0.0010237492,0.017544083,0.0003910758,0.00021432864,0.08432584,0.8915857,0.000034126686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010640141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013545987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02387705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003878831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006152782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07987672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591818506","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","title":"Good Faith Duties in Contract Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fair dealing; Law; Honesty; Good faith; Obligation; Bad faith; Loyalty; Power (physics); Faith; Unconscionability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01579050959091266,"score_gpt":0.2533316598242262,"score_spread":0.2375411502333135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591818506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053933572,0.0029731032,0.065958574,0.040075097,0.00061800197,0.00024642062,0.00006136322,0.00011706547,0.83601683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93336505,0.0010577957,0.012835231,0.0057368227,0.00032604646,0.00016050381,0.0000377613,0.000059457307,0.046421368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690064,0.012308253,0.0020412412,0.0028466433,0.009782193,0.004015211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97256327,0.011109928,0.0028394416,0.0056962245,0.004769606,0.00302159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02322553,0.0005763579,0.00077837304,0.0013852621,0.008207702,0.01031822,0.0022847936,0.008440062,0.0057054446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037818268,0.00058267615,0.0007319877,0.0012704058,0.060282305,0.008467978,0.009986011,0.009819522,0.0013399911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003935038,0.000012556446,0.00018515496,0.000014603661,0.0000023961402,0.000057158908,0.0022095784,0.00017277988,0.0000755059,0.9935086,0.00091513846,0.0028426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002139321,0.00006120481,0.001135149,0.00024557387,0.000010837727,0.00030999925,0.002252203,0.0008195309,0.00037616843,0.91954803,0.075174466,0.000045402558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008488028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006769514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02322553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00638629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011626394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122829795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593030345","doi":"10.21991/c9qm2f","title":"Royal Succession and the Canadian Crown as a Corporation Sole: A Critique of Canada's Succession to the Throne Act, 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Parks Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Ecological succession; Statutory law; Law; Corporate law; Constitution; Throne; Crown (dentistry); Management; Political science; Economics; Politics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.01039906631768936,"score_gpt":0.26718739993042645,"score_spread":0.2567883336127371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593030345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03550563,0.011345082,0.002456167,0.20139973,0.0012178648,0.00010129075,0.00038411113,0.0000752912,0.7475148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81343937,0.004040442,0.0016471008,0.043181084,0.0005632603,0.0000849941,0.00009572525,0.00009230193,0.13685574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910595,0.0010508952,0.0001739919,0.0008553586,0.003324271,0.003535853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956151,0.001170883,0.00017601701,0.00022646252,0.0019152357,0.00089631154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052813515,0.00052643946,0.0005879435,0.0019402651,0.040038742,0.016369553,0.003315806,0.011611713,0.0070699085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011520535,0.0006479748,0.000666353,0.0029290456,0.033233974,0.0034144043,0.0032362507,0.012318713,0.0004779035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008162993,0.0000065874838,0.0002035277,0.000017643955,0.0000037278146,0.00007512972,0.0026870938,0.00016944346,0.00004503085,0.9690344,0.025074521,0.0026746963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008828088,0.00002159135,0.00494636,0.00043940565,0.00004574408,0.00010632309,0.010640444,0.0011738118,0.0004130762,0.20269504,0.77927834,0.0001515393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99181914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99463826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15513356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15513356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28100622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97992533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159336626","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701729.003.0019","title":"Fiduciary Authority and the Service Conception","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Delegated authority; Directive; Possession (linguistics); Warrant; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Traditional authority","score_opus":0.031675879063600185,"score_gpt":0.24451928557364472,"score_spread":0.21284340651004452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159336626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017736498,0.0032682053,0.054168727,0.02394879,0.00041517318,0.000044948283,0.000055799548,0.0000888914,0.9002729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478788,0.0014793263,0.0086215995,0.002279254,0.00045482555,0.00008250846,0.00004756225,0.000067271154,0.039088923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934248,0.0033028994,0.0002120557,0.0005569642,0.0019895928,0.0005137242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99542,0.0022257967,0.00038316767,0.0005938606,0.000974024,0.0004032354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005580457,0.00037184404,0.0004425202,0.0020453131,0.0033384203,0.006228481,0.0012210348,0.0032817896,0.0053053764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008300614,0.00026127353,0.0005441303,0.0014443857,0.03880712,0.0059470483,0.003223028,0.0056005106,0.0013056857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8485647e-7,0.0000011804473,0.00001238455,0.0000029153475,2.215519e-7,0.00000579118,0.0002505242,0.00002428297,0.000007339087,0.99884206,0.00034403664,0.0005084556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050722397,0.000005765662,0.00006236965,0.000045877317,0.0000020640668,0.000049126753,0.00024939704,0.00034376243,0.000050363997,0.96587133,0.033310104,0.000004691985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048152087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003237454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00655539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00655539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004784888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047562957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593907394","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511494956","title":"Commercial Trusts in European Private Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Convention; Scope (computer science); Common law; Section (typography); Investment (military); Pension; Index (typography); Accounting; Law; Liability; Law and economics; Terminology; Business; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.033022631860165685,"score_gpt":0.31370109617780095,"score_spread":0.28067846431763527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593907394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018396625,0.014742598,0.0075072786,0.015351866,0.00046927072,0.000029452467,0.000026060314,0.00007140073,0.9434054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.850334,0.00819714,0.0029860972,0.0047122343,0.0005802709,0.00008511224,0.000055923254,0.00007940857,0.1329698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99321425,0.0031547984,0.00031798857,0.0006671835,0.0016542632,0.0009914704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958371,0.002133651,0.00038179973,0.00068211055,0.0006608047,0.00030461824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055729263,0.00030321584,0.00040890367,0.001628755,0.0059829187,0.015105154,0.0008263277,0.0054249233,0.0048062503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012237193,0.0003834537,0.00041039818,0.0033210937,0.021385288,0.010883267,0.0050243787,0.0041975453,0.00079659175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001193445,0.0000025048778,0.00002385329,0.000004940959,6.7966084e-7,0.00002158581,0.0012611417,0.00004342253,0.0000066313282,0.9935168,0.0023273015,0.0027899067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009788943,0.000016895237,0.00049790833,0.00019913902,0.000006077699,0.00020945158,0.003032981,0.0008910478,0.00009909278,0.6556415,0.3393807,0.000015380076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010954978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065995273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015105154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0112040555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052620023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08129144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596394876","doi":"","title":"Justiciability and standing to challenge legislation in the Commonwealth: a tale of the traditionalist and judicial activist approaches","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Adjudication; Constitutionality; Judicial review; Political science; Legislation; Constitution; Complaint; Judicial discretion; Common law; Politics","score_opus":0.21682462579469947,"score_gpt":0.3520220948740729,"score_spread":0.1351974690793734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596394876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12414139,0.01368471,0.053358797,0.1820699,0.001423121,0.00018190315,0.000036843645,0.00004659717,0.62505674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631593,0.002209072,0.0044752588,0.007882265,0.00080605916,0.000107721695,0.000011815539,0.000034843346,0.02131364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911327,0.0039452063,0.00031655317,0.00080814294,0.0024975939,0.0012997823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936878,0.003793341,0.00051494467,0.0007500182,0.0008610264,0.00039281248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008605726,0.00039019185,0.0005427069,0.0022739344,0.007902386,0.010078287,0.0017461776,0.0060109445,0.0019850442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012010846,0.00030081504,0.0006579326,0.0012824861,0.1201846,0.010192122,0.008981299,0.011052088,0.00019492704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010038041,0.000002990659,0.000047717203,0.000004622381,7.868939e-7,0.000017552706,0.0021913948,0.000040173327,0.000028072476,0.9963766,0.00029249207,0.0009966402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009894979,0.000021415164,0.00057864,0.00013638796,0.000004203068,0.000081644095,0.004408714,0.0002462463,0.000197179,0.93040997,0.063889794,0.000015914458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011887871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017952098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011887871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008576139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012072026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062224567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597286103","doi":"","title":"Down Under Exceptionalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Jurisdiction; Exceptionalism; Law; Autonomy; Incentive; Political science; American exceptionalism; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.012027734976223043,"score_gpt":0.3058393177112851,"score_spread":0.293811582735062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597286103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10064855,0.00094096607,0.003793432,0.040321156,0.0011764746,0.000046994937,0.00025033735,0.00010356783,0.8527184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89604944,0.0006686111,0.0005865211,0.013027391,0.00070351065,0.000054913522,0.0001291691,0.000095468036,0.08868495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950132,0.0008378278,0.00015859267,0.0009218567,0.0007841976,0.0022843464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470526,0.000927884,0.0005928674,0.0005938933,0.0012579379,0.0019220777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00347849,0.00024117461,0.0004956439,0.0011658281,0.009392683,0.006073753,0.0009149741,0.0030616233,0.025687374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011488562,0.00024808268,0.0005465819,0.0007336456,0.011286627,0.006112984,0.009235202,0.0060884487,0.002522619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004534752,0.00002321733,0.0039526187,0.000042411637,0.000009895004,0.0007013989,0.010947926,0.000095042546,0.00017461856,0.92198926,0.038652457,0.023365745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026395475,0.00006579379,0.016702665,0.00041187668,0.000032191325,0.0008694506,0.01838907,0.00041958003,0.0005292756,0.48090073,0.48161033,0.000042610962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018363155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021917101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025687374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033411377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043891366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08593279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599550406","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.013","title":"Justice in the <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i> Book <scp>v</scp>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09106606279021817,"score_gpt":0.28190227775798515,"score_spread":0.19083621496776698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599550406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001039783,0.030300407,0.002080815,0.007891521,0.0009746223,0.000019801722,0.000052720305,0.000036224978,0.9576041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06626331,0.020320894,0.0028106724,0.008238187,0.0008910781,0.00017746411,0.00013411941,0.00010093411,0.90106326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924254,0.000307995,0.000019407364,0.00007580515,0.00025145733,0.00010275262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971145,0.00014325844,0.000015244757,0.000029314113,0.00008265559,0.000018017545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063433585,0.00047329723,0.00035532546,0.0009623005,0.0038627617,0.0035122395,0.0007060011,0.0023957859,0.009271048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013517013,0.00021538598,0.0002024222,0.0013596008,0.005226699,0.0023714944,0.0011601737,0.0033126934,0.0023589884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004732966,0.000005379499,0.00004521621,0.00005153861,0.0000016898746,0.00003703587,0.0011161669,0.0001194598,0.000058745158,0.8774593,0.10723192,0.013868935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012169044,0.0000030086003,0.00017173252,0.00020906294,0.0000015265497,0.00006592098,0.00030140972,0.00011311718,0.00009961111,0.12747371,0.8715524,0.0000072868115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04408926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08820177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04408926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009384124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054687536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08766526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599641208","doi":"","title":"Conquering the Common Law Hydra: A Probably Correct and Reasonable Overview of Current Standards of Appellate and Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Standard of review; Supreme court; Discretion; Judicial review; Political science; Common law; Correctness; Judgement; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.028317676050508042,"score_gpt":0.3585002713831039,"score_spread":0.33018259533259586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599641208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006895746,0.15074134,0.03867226,0.6798868,0.004382175,0.00046672637,0.0005278577,0.00043350545,0.11799349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47587708,0.14920323,0.10466807,0.20259582,0.008531985,0.0006312552,0.0008688617,0.00042362305,0.057200104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8858572,0.025689289,0.007606224,0.0073987762,0.06353443,0.009914101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86596024,0.047477443,0.0047643958,0.006071868,0.07116682,0.004559244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060948923,0.0007049469,0.0012471528,0.01058583,0.011669981,0.032242518,0.006280181,0.010324522,0.0016548061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111024134,0.001135537,0.0010162194,0.010081189,0.03534567,0.010006516,0.0034071365,0.011812431,0.00072085665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010990045,0.00001850248,0.0011462865,0.0003516041,0.000026975511,0.00012431275,0.0019144638,0.00073704415,0.0001704058,0.8781835,0.07888532,0.03843065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002612476,0.00003631525,0.0069532245,0.0021336463,0.000051961233,0.00020080862,0.002737439,0.0029199333,0.00039749377,0.24743204,0.7369085,0.00020251892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88354236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90354544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88354236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14350122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23992442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599686277","doi":"","title":"Developments in Foreseeability and Remoteness: The Limits of Contract Damages","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Breach of contract; Mill; Law; Exchequer; Compensation (psychology); Force majeure; Unjust enrichment; Business; Restitution; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02059351250211198,"score_gpt":0.32338449600253977,"score_spread":0.30279098350042777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599686277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03437946,0.016634058,0.11217488,0.044991415,0.0005753556,0.00017236086,0.00015166019,0.0000963386,0.79082453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644943,0.0042803045,0.010243271,0.0037500265,0.0013289072,0.0003014652,0.00004604572,0.000071557704,0.015484278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758168,0.0080782715,0.0012615817,0.004070413,0.008568363,0.0022046159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943817,0.04166091,0.0033319525,0.0064688027,0.0032241277,0.0014971411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024582291,0.00083921914,0.0012889747,0.0025505594,0.0050531756,0.015582865,0.0034836198,0.0112919435,0.008875725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057499193,0.0010277139,0.0018644744,0.0013785089,0.05101426,0.02855977,0.011172947,0.019735245,0.0010359703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008200881,0.000008343891,0.00008630964,0.000010723132,0.0000038776107,0.000041159554,0.00023300691,0.0002791812,0.000048969767,0.99782085,0.00028045164,0.0011789543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011563653,0.000020397352,0.0001756266,0.00007213092,0.000007503681,0.000088035966,0.00017101051,0.0004889253,0.00008292233,0.9895717,0.00929714,0.0000130649905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031416514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015897221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024582291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007022268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004602917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13000518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600686206","doi":"","title":"損害賠償 豫定額의 職權減額上 參酌의 基準時와 參酌 事由 - 부동산 매매계약에 있어서 ‘解除 후 時價의 變動’이 참작사유로 될 수 있는가? (대상판례 : 2004. 12. 10. 선고 2002다73852) -","year":2005,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"민사법학","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Real estate; Database transaction; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029924826899481994,"score_gpt":0.3132953849565302,"score_spread":0.2833705580570482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600686206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03777642,0.006129492,0.0040417165,0.049920347,0.00076927955,0.00009693664,0.00018011438,0.000025226975,0.90106046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6753641,0.0050560744,0.0029839592,0.01948362,0.00033791293,0.00010051824,0.00015305613,0.000044951325,0.29647592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852836,0.00044786147,0.00011363729,0.00017488185,0.0004179041,0.00031723172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885595,0.00038803078,0.00014214648,0.000074356474,0.00048227288,0.00005727845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018862815,0.00023272455,0.0001988319,0.0007955195,0.0039639343,0.0067741964,0.0006949118,0.004070248,0.01558484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022988676,0.00023480538,0.0003589429,0.0009660219,0.009084612,0.0045535844,0.0011577042,0.0026740103,0.0029324775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012755555,0.000022546812,0.0009974677,0.000063110776,0.000004035268,0.0002204388,0.004437037,0.00008920158,0.00033430284,0.96942556,0.015619234,0.008774356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013770367,0.00006738639,0.010025109,0.0005638309,0.000024322457,0.0006440302,0.024892585,0.0004350232,0.0022931644,0.22637632,0.7345931,0.00007127596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043076202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08088817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043076202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005888313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003545745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08565098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601986198","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1027","title":"Book Review: American Property: A History of How, Why and What We Own, by Stuart Banner","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Banner; Property (philosophy); History; American history; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Archaeology; Ancient history","score_opus":0.02436011751485694,"score_gpt":0.27630313042027443,"score_spread":0.2519430129054175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601986198","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010977281,0.8675683,0.00024671716,0.05351442,0.0296532,0.0000119721935,0.00014713185,0.000044812765,0.048703667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002754677,0.81434053,0.00034208715,0.03905065,0.034819163,0.000052264208,0.00031703172,0.0001312686,0.108192354],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991425,0.0001575786,0.000055928587,0.00014583202,0.0004261257,0.00007183812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745446,0.0012048094,0.00018751953,0.00012230159,0.0007368327,0.00029405122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007994034,0.0012013746,0.0012529375,0.0043135164,0.002550432,0.007216487,0.0017377614,0.0037149165,0.04375636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051425328,0.00062872976,0.0005800464,0.007326929,0.0041616256,0.009535456,0.0024323182,0.0074638356,0.025278468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047711524,0.000007669427,0.000053057865,0.00022105548,0.0000027614888,0.00001949068,0.00011044466,0.000027681876,0.000014399651,0.0061435467,0.96367306,0.029722158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012740999,0.0000016690948,0.00010228224,0.0006432734,0.0000016907919,0.000056331228,0.00006366804,0.0000066293965,0.0000053993076,0.0015678073,0.9975466,0.000003476341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014977846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028758131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04375636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047551547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052432716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14637965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603569638","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of Institutionalizing Petition System in China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; China; Consistency (knowledge bases); Heading (navigation); Political science; Law; Field (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Mode (computer interface); Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.057924878724689266,"score_gpt":0.40729538353106737,"score_spread":0.3493705048063781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603569638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729127,0.00009529062,0.001062277,0.0005870721,0.0000054606658,0.00007311246,0.00009145213,0.000021829355,0.02515083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982504,0.00003726892,0.00017458541,0.000019628951,0.000002651215,0.000013498746,0.000046442517,0.00000255611,0.0014529644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981895,0.00037824642,0.0001223378,0.0002084709,0.00040169104,0.0006997543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976273,0.00042963075,0.00072781765,0.00019698782,0.00056635373,0.00045190277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013788725,0.00017809852,0.0003605842,0.002618707,0.0024355103,0.003416469,0.0010960741,0.0006255446,0.005302694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035062714,0.00018654976,0.0005163244,0.0034155014,0.0030433408,0.0016132578,0.002167296,0.0005544942,0.0001487596],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012822205,0.00030242058,0.48981306,0.00021449618,0.00019441458,0.0043117623,0.020574726,0.015156597,0.0023751643,0.4271233,0.003011564,0.03679425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007324961,0.00018060874,0.8426503,0.00016050917,0.00021322047,0.00050528935,0.03170278,0.04917819,0.0015697494,0.045409236,0.028240485,0.000116363255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11651645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086219266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11651645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013079658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010761085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23167646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604176938","doi":"","title":"Beals v. Saldanha: The Great Canadian Comity Experiment Continues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Enforcement; Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Good faith; Business; Economics; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.014496831904277417,"score_gpt":0.2933244050015334,"score_spread":0.278827573097256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604176938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12063439,0.003038659,0.0010277333,0.17587468,0.0014463398,0.00045572975,0.0039010865,0.00016098208,0.69346046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6225945,0.0016736019,0.001453462,0.07581584,0.00044851983,0.00034095044,0.0008107096,0.00010161892,0.29676077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991979,0.001218625,0.00008959927,0.0008364703,0.0031605652,0.0027156563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935795,0.0021163262,0.00018985475,0.0005931728,0.0021599573,0.0013612018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007613889,0.000767303,0.0009921442,0.0011843069,0.028424073,0.0071586124,0.0024527446,0.008747691,0.022499282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015980734,0.0004558127,0.0007648975,0.0021864313,0.007865777,0.0031111033,0.0028144578,0.007412305,0.002054505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011253315,0.00015980107,0.0065582884,0.00014001165,0.00010080526,0.0004522162,0.0039292355,0.000664306,0.0011321013,0.5783209,0.386136,0.021281015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001418748,0.0003606381,0.037286386,0.00034648788,0.00044870283,0.00017293848,0.0095559135,0.0021763504,0.0027822067,0.09983392,0.84518695,0.0004307171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060482632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060482632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13271087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4388343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604356878","doi":"","title":"A frolic in the law of tort: expanding the scope of employers' vicarious liability","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Liability; Context (archaeology); Law; Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Strict liability; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014139013442477866,"score_gpt":0.3149858926513315,"score_spread":0.3008468792088536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604356878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054938782,0.02990562,0.12336599,0.20727828,0.0019299953,0.0001510973,0.000058126272,0.00012733584,0.5822449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89213055,0.010099613,0.032579415,0.02962552,0.0031741948,0.00020686311,0.000028275552,0.00006585036,0.032089707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185115,0.0041749603,0.0002956949,0.0007760532,0.0022913306,0.0006107418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147624,0.0066564106,0.00040769356,0.0005951807,0.0005201621,0.00034435975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011191511,0.00042970566,0.0006868754,0.0023810372,0.0051580034,0.008736914,0.0015126991,0.013710831,0.0018979992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012259346,0.0006614074,0.0010689716,0.0010966371,0.03840217,0.014718237,0.0073900227,0.014931633,0.000454853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003109289,0.000008480627,0.000078084406,0.000010357183,8.1973985e-7,0.00007296175,0.0010215653,0.00014277648,0.00008217139,0.99509937,0.00086929946,0.0026110641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011866923,0.000043592256,0.00045567335,0.00022967967,0.0000066772577,0.00025710493,0.00080361887,0.0011238143,0.00019745318,0.94177884,0.055069856,0.000021837895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031122037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044130413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013710831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004116191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004934629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059187114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605576174","doi":"","title":"La Possibilité D'Une Contre-Théorie Du Contrat (The Possibility of a Counter-Theory of Contract)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.015251970928550396,"score_gpt":0.26250534818434257,"score_spread":0.24725337725579216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605576174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026993783,0.00956468,0.07234071,0.06772738,0.0012041861,0.00006195944,0.00020063393,0.000109206536,0.8217975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9219687,0.0030029577,0.009449515,0.004833249,0.0009717422,0.00014488149,0.00010094314,0.000114267554,0.05941379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99294525,0.003839367,0.00017809936,0.0010125495,0.0014899255,0.00053483876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98837435,0.0073349252,0.0009791972,0.0011822765,0.0018721725,0.00025696444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005667626,0.00064587296,0.00049211923,0.0018293583,0.0042871227,0.010311006,0.0014203503,0.005528649,0.021417044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010596448,0.00034952455,0.0009104659,0.0015919261,0.019107113,0.008776358,0.0023505446,0.0046800454,0.0017447643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000458176,0.0000016978415,0.000036106343,0.000014941996,0.0000015082782,0.000020859574,0.00025812595,0.00006494483,0.000021803744,0.99804795,0.00080918346,0.0007183412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002144604,0.000020504998,0.00035078713,0.00017020793,0.000015687385,0.00019696976,0.00093099,0.0015393489,0.0003476272,0.88659406,0.10979493,0.000017374092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012454373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071267006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021417044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010321565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042236163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07488859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606528688","doi":"","title":"Johanna Wagner and the Rival Opera Houses","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Tort; Opera; Law; Private law; Relation (database); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Art; Sociology; Public law; Art history; Liability","score_opus":0.02174676871542213,"score_gpt":0.2733349761007105,"score_spread":0.25158820738528836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606528688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06398944,0.005350593,0.0010513258,0.062212497,0.00094223744,0.000023986428,0.00009491766,0.00003420482,0.86630076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6021863,0.0019668697,0.00046146984,0.010197255,0.0003005258,0.000023085904,0.000052741,0.00003749046,0.38477427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981515,0.00033921513,0.000042233605,0.0002578717,0.00047470862,0.0007344442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999348,0.00023992914,0.000052683477,0.000055150922,0.00010140596,0.00020294455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011758097,0.00027613447,0.00028456215,0.00072473666,0.009656134,0.008288921,0.0007042522,0.0043473057,0.013753383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035115217,0.00039903558,0.0002615387,0.00077999465,0.0059283287,0.0023431827,0.003515497,0.004088518,0.0019962708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029295596,0.0000144425,0.0006358365,0.000014503368,0.0000056512195,0.0003388212,0.0030254568,0.00007880072,0.00016486406,0.9540365,0.034968376,0.006687532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017983786,0.000027533866,0.0019263019,0.00008407183,0.000017126338,0.00034320855,0.005692555,0.00026552076,0.0004581352,0.0929542,0.8981833,0.000029986826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070623025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1595884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070623025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008562609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058862222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14042395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1611832157","doi":"10.5040/9781474200790.ch-013","title":"North-West Transportation Co Ltd v Beatty (1887)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archaeology; Geography; History","score_opus":0.037660738208656744,"score_gpt":0.275766108398293,"score_spread":0.2381053701896363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1611832157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0305501,0.0035778703,0.00066852244,0.022280535,0.0012767075,0.00009947176,0.0011641944,0.00009954095,0.940283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11958592,0.0012966637,0.00040186272,0.017893624,0.00016613239,0.00009107916,0.00048610513,0.00006038082,0.86001825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741554,0.00010653611,0.000050812567,0.00020555631,0.0009837755,0.001237789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921405,0.000120356366,0.000037386926,0.0000222942,0.00047178662,0.00013403667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000650939,0.00038980745,0.00018924929,0.00083499,0.012525749,0.0036057148,0.0008140094,0.0048299166,0.027446026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025152292,0.00061289535,0.0003472781,0.000889267,0.0016973732,0.0013672678,0.0013181624,0.004597266,0.0040790136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059372,0.00002502363,0.0053192154,0.00010696127,0.000016029455,0.0011868514,0.006407986,0.00017499931,0.00090883696,0.2425062,0.7129889,0.030299554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013173518,0.00002000461,0.0081515275,0.00009722018,0.000016450149,0.00013549403,0.0011965188,0.00010107372,0.00041389427,0.0014845367,0.98833734,0.000032700802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.907528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96907735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.907528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022973748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028442213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18603313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1621013140","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495229.006","title":"Unfair competition and the doctrine of misappropriation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Tort; Law; Doctrine; Common law; Political science; Appropriation; Trespass","score_opus":0.02424036527417452,"score_gpt":0.21662950595030755,"score_spread":0.19238914067613302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1621013140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008195753,0.010115064,0.023288313,0.009998935,0.00033742015,0.000041673775,0.000035483954,0.000043181397,0.9479442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6776614,0.008052057,0.0062455735,0.005846535,0.00065236556,0.00022951531,0.000045466786,0.00008547231,0.30118167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992773,0.002066445,0.0002027997,0.00066863076,0.003342443,0.0009466164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730825,0.0012649682,0.00022156147,0.00057731295,0.00046617503,0.00016171797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004292818,0.0007373836,0.00058130856,0.001333819,0.005139421,0.008566721,0.0016913579,0.005452227,0.0050242073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004945284,0.0004573098,0.00057067646,0.0017589469,0.039616298,0.008794513,0.005504109,0.005402602,0.0011908291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.359372e-7,0.0000015582522,0.000013490662,0.0000050063245,5.605831e-7,0.000015749096,0.0003992711,0.00005765056,0.000015958709,0.9979381,0.000623084,0.0009290798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028953605,0.00000800679,0.000084469866,0.00008988221,0.000003491915,0.00009379792,0.00041941405,0.00032299006,0.00010175426,0.9120099,0.086854815,0.000008490912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013965347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013629345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013965347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011600346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009570489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084166765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16316014","doi":"","title":"Problem of Parallel Actions: The Softer Alternative?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Deference; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05119798218304313,"score_gpt":0.31209488357465887,"score_spread":0.26089690139161575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16316014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03932715,0.0028674908,0.19437432,0.14940317,0.0023377957,0.00027417438,0.00017227883,0.00027822496,0.6109654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85007447,0.0016483953,0.055954397,0.02849522,0.0030840754,0.00051482156,0.00010666957,0.0002350031,0.05988701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753185,0.007270509,0.0011706611,0.0038817949,0.010296131,0.0020623745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836469,0.007097514,0.001338688,0.0047409534,0.0022183964,0.0009575469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01220012,0.0014685441,0.0015314339,0.002247089,0.0063601495,0.013149977,0.005740313,0.015001432,0.021748185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034197945,0.0010122808,0.0020994602,0.001576176,0.03315298,0.02770893,0.014348052,0.024521958,0.0031322322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000827679,0.000010860147,0.000042879616,0.000019691515,0.0000052347227,0.000066504836,0.00033196618,0.00024200602,0.000104730316,0.9941613,0.00096973486,0.0040368065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021398237,0.000012152797,0.00005849135,0.00005917338,0.00000700183,0.000076642966,0.0003159779,0.001144759,0.00012642823,0.9869802,0.011181208,0.000016674407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050235996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005572918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021748185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071900836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008843003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07275492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1632280653","doi":"10.3968/4392","title":"Protection of Farmers’ Interests in Rural Land Circulation of China: Theoretical Frame and Realization Mechanism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Circulation (fluid dynamics); Frame (networking); China; Business; Process (computing); Realization (probability); Protection mechanism; Revenue; Economic system; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Finance; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021407081230936237,"score_gpt":0.34289970254699054,"score_spread":0.3214926213160543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1632280653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22977485,0.0014168699,0.17978883,0.03126114,0.00022937375,0.00063028774,0.00013816697,0.000074145006,0.5566864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821284,0.00034667185,0.009942104,0.00035993307,0.000054477667,0.0002762004,0.000023849243,0.0000054443512,0.0068629743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980065,0.0009009969,0.00008534773,0.00028158128,0.00038685635,0.00033872094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984377,0.0007513988,0.00026310794,0.00015915837,0.000248889,0.0001397585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042822547,0.00044798708,0.00030985748,0.0016996729,0.0032709409,0.0040669725,0.0012458871,0.0026786255,0.004095008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028906022,0.00031023612,0.00053944107,0.0011194603,0.014108566,0.004641097,0.0025809878,0.0016892377,0.00027874706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036448753,0.00001511501,0.0002843159,0.000012917856,0.0000021537294,0.00005317912,0.0014953576,0.00027461693,0.00007321319,0.99611074,0.00017354195,0.0015012396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061702,0.00005141519,0.0019183371,0.00009823197,0.000029038007,0.00012575375,0.0028813751,0.006862954,0.00044738018,0.9744431,0.013054244,0.00002652014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006372601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036680729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075309146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075309146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007068894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05464083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W164522872","doi":"","title":"Laying Bare an Ethical Thread: From IP to Property to Private Law?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Private property; Tangible property; Political science; Law; Sociology; Intangible property","score_opus":0.03514848090773142,"score_gpt":0.34623466394380603,"score_spread":0.3110861830360746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W164522872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018359805,0.007577411,0.055325355,0.6508235,0.003320877,0.00006271538,0.00005991893,0.00013092515,0.26433954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8539248,0.005377137,0.01253013,0.06769758,0.00493741,0.00024782048,0.00006365922,0.0003637813,0.05485779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854735,0.008304665,0.00040531124,0.001490545,0.0028888686,0.0014370496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854655,0.0090349745,0.0009996623,0.0018062524,0.001597117,0.0010964694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014570148,0.00051724556,0.0007411915,0.0010806008,0.009594656,0.023126245,0.0022326983,0.011612999,0.0071933656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027198335,0.00036278632,0.00061725243,0.0011748082,0.0787979,0.035719473,0.00900171,0.01931616,0.001598432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033198257,0.000008153809,0.00006716803,0.000017695887,0.0000013555343,0.00004568169,0.0054831514,0.00003388687,0.00003283119,0.987895,0.0040270393,0.00238461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006754307,0.000014545915,0.00014277306,0.00023486893,0.0000032356008,0.00009106488,0.010366398,0.0002858533,0.00016265435,0.86716,0.12151987,0.000011838859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047209673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025621317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023126245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007601152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008599166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077055216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1659383018","doi":"","title":"Property (Greek and Roman)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Connotation; Object (grammar); Property (philosophy); Term (time); Terminology; Power (physics); Law and economics; Symbol (formal); Law; The Thing; Ancient Greek; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02944712102856449,"score_gpt":0.27050436546833206,"score_spread":0.24105724443976756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1659383018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059585175,0.012462538,0.0046281805,0.0055583497,0.001690814,0.000042436743,0.00042339036,0.00010847645,0.9691273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.601173,0.023221325,0.016895441,0.011678676,0.0049885083,0.00040338424,0.0013331748,0.00060232554,0.33970416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977283,0.00089445064,0.00015453823,0.00043356552,0.0005289112,0.00026029514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920505,0.00026872658,0.00014234024,0.00015182127,0.00016756255,0.00006447132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013776269,0.0008816145,0.00051728525,0.002114208,0.0039026965,0.0056536347,0.0008299098,0.0019161726,0.018147297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035830408,0.0002534643,0.00034411377,0.0034528065,0.012748362,0.007456457,0.0026328997,0.0029166762,0.008837822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013659142,0.00000871134,0.00013432067,0.00006819353,0.0000022298213,0.00010313081,0.0034779578,0.000035143552,0.00009692338,0.95775115,0.021715958,0.016592748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058268392,0.000015798047,0.00038945023,0.00017446093,0.000002232164,0.00030086678,0.0012991235,0.00004328102,0.00006674101,0.103860684,0.8938332,0.000008310945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002955555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025820925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018147297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030525692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001668158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06070876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662631561","doi":"10.3968/5154","title":"Study on the Meaning of Lex Voluntatisin the Choice of Law in International Private Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Law; Meaning (existential); Value (mathematics); Conflict of laws; Point (geometry); Position (finance); Attribution; Private law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05686507947549736,"score_gpt":0.3980816612678982,"score_spread":0.34121658179240083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662631561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33996063,0.006855219,0.0606818,0.033313483,0.00044899413,0.000102758386,0.00009352787,0.000045972305,0.5584976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99083406,0.0006332607,0.0019427615,0.00054475025,0.000070264854,0.000037653568,0.000018140947,0.000014774656,0.0059043583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959157,0.0024906653,0.00015294393,0.0004157085,0.00070516433,0.00031982068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949456,0.003608674,0.0005911726,0.00035603566,0.0003227302,0.00017588439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051986394,0.00021862154,0.00030612134,0.0014452884,0.0041665253,0.0060492503,0.00073481305,0.002357891,0.0035311533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071795355,0.00018257035,0.00036192665,0.0021041618,0.028362386,0.011886611,0.0039013305,0.003690929,0.00027459417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030103827,0.000006616235,0.00024472649,0.000011839534,9.408657e-7,0.000028583187,0.004857557,0.000030238125,0.00006874547,0.9929264,0.00018361359,0.0016377153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067604456,0.000024248351,0.0017986057,0.00015863976,0.000005839718,0.00014436505,0.011424127,0.000678224,0.00043685947,0.9503226,0.034981605,0.000018139763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010549503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001287325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060492503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044132066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022368405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03202015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166531706","doi":"","title":"Privacy, Trusts and Cross-Border Transfers of Personal Information: The Quebec Perspective in the Canadian Context","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Business; Statute; Context (archaeology); Data Protection Act 1998; Scope (computer science); Legislation; Order (exchange); Liability; Information privacy; Express trust; Freedom of information; Law; Political science; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.007725915589079477,"score_gpt":0.3252167629790057,"score_spread":0.3174908473899262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166531706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12203835,0.014524377,0.009872231,0.141118,0.00041649566,0.00013098108,0.0014715657,0.000069114394,0.71035886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323845,0.007075862,0.0025216197,0.0057201674,0.00009861004,0.000049904174,0.00017536125,0.000023679637,0.05195029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960943,0.00095525995,0.0000985094,0.0003438193,0.0011395774,0.0013684876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950879,0.0016229163,0.00037291937,0.000309021,0.0018525124,0.0007546171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002378618,0.00041409617,0.0003753114,0.0022756855,0.017917244,0.011119932,0.0015962169,0.003374917,0.007824073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006221941,0.00033868887,0.0006130075,0.00465547,0.012360798,0.004590008,0.0029962114,0.0032016174,0.0003299765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020977373,0.000011943112,0.0037856607,0.000046547662,0.00001279326,0.00056820776,0.009312969,0.0010033892,0.00010391393,0.9676761,0.009902883,0.0075545637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005270633,0.00003889154,0.029174227,0.0012557773,0.00012832525,0.00093172945,0.054996423,0.0068642246,0.00046304584,0.24670614,0.6591511,0.00023743523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99610245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99565095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13725366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13725366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.113502495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99584967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16671126","doi":"10.29173/alr123","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Grand Council of the Crees","funders":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","keywords":"Freehold; Law; Energy law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Environmental law; Economics","score_opus":0.16396172225428923,"score_gpt":0.34957115516568765,"score_spread":0.18560943291139842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16671126","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010771017,0.5816732,0.001192224,0.2502772,0.0041596876,0.000039591603,0.0001827139,0.000060210135,0.15164421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20837905,0.5901808,0.0025553666,0.13564397,0.016444439,0.000054965476,0.00040319914,0.00006714951,0.046271123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875474,0.002352327,0.0006163018,0.0013479498,0.006371589,0.0017643683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628881,0.018648438,0.0028324192,0.0006922813,0.013782741,0.0011559648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01431611,0.00027849816,0.00058084633,0.0050618495,0.005599672,0.010146572,0.0027028185,0.010298007,0.0063003628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030974297,0.0007496146,0.00054968375,0.008934859,0.0068698004,0.0039414437,0.0015124759,0.008616073,0.0009345285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038791124,0.0000959006,0.001607721,0.0011763078,0.000039219645,0.00091817405,0.003400993,0.0007289328,0.00054268475,0.47869417,0.31220224,0.20055479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001786698,0.000021537267,0.0039546047,0.0008797566,0.000026855814,0.00031360655,0.0013957729,0.00017963143,0.0001909031,0.016114073,0.976863,0.00004248382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28382277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48113522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7161772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029369988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03292547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5643415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1678082181","doi":"10.1002/iir.1201","title":"A Comparative Analysis of Anglo‐Australian Pre‐packs: Can the Means Be Made to Justify the Ends?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Administration (probate law); Balance (ability); Work (physics); Business; Business practice; Law; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Finance; Business administration; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.1406550897992904,"score_gpt":0.4496114111496491,"score_spread":0.30895632135035866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1678082181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83124566,0.0021965338,0.0007988405,0.0014167052,0.000058215974,0.00009633241,0.0000923514,0.00000828062,0.16408712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777183,0.0007646747,0.00042278587,0.0002942668,0.000014457448,0.000043407497,0.00007770399,0.000007748691,0.020656714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561465,0.0015548904,0.0001557175,0.00029173956,0.0015636729,0.0008193185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926662,0.0027719345,0.0011921942,0.00057161204,0.00220622,0.00059180154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004852241,0.00013353379,0.0003275993,0.0024562494,0.0053875945,0.0037778157,0.00086068816,0.00074553327,0.013077553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011298594,0.00028205317,0.00025341814,0.0032111348,0.0051289843,0.003062846,0.0037997458,0.0016911059,0.00054500357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004317231,0.00037613063,0.0921641,0.00078430865,0.00008817988,0.0019319559,0.25918102,0.0003367429,0.0016907962,0.49377576,0.011368977,0.1378704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022381853,0.00047673902,0.5816518,0.0012780434,0.00010010113,0.0005614167,0.17923488,0.0007782068,0.0013658119,0.014923674,0.21954657,0.0000604204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046931848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.107738286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046931848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058815842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041605528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09331739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1678126139","doi":"","title":"The Principle of Open Justice: A Comparative Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Constitution; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Economic Justice; Publicity; Comparative law; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.043745988407081576,"score_gpt":0.42472745334255313,"score_spread":0.3809814649354716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1678126139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006554524,0.032605495,0.020383278,0.032922067,0.000796462,0.000035679157,0.000080888065,0.000017988423,0.9066036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8829423,0.040810484,0.017970454,0.01140871,0.0031314022,0.00034858982,0.00017104024,0.00010624933,0.043110732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884263,0.0068526766,0.00022166008,0.0007474674,0.0027192142,0.0010326979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99043196,0.006769877,0.00045065608,0.00072915346,0.0012427307,0.00037564273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009996119,0.000492222,0.0010194873,0.005216846,0.00709078,0.011188086,0.0024715224,0.0069218427,0.00925724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119140055,0.00035159747,0.0009606416,0.0047997753,0.038195785,0.0149273975,0.006004927,0.006297402,0.0007432466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001654893,0.0000024479225,0.000011803073,0.000013815661,0.0000012838502,0.00001045408,0.00021575931,0.00004724107,0.000008983886,0.9979804,0.0005756804,0.0011303697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007874055,0.000013988616,0.00022838231,0.0001965458,0.0000068879112,0.00005910274,0.0010366798,0.00022568263,0.00005701744,0.90979046,0.08837025,0.000007153086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008310601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067567527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011188086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00994527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046996525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07215834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1684343192","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Materiality Requirement for Non-Disclosure and Misrepresentation in Insurance Contracts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Business; Duty; Scope (computer science); Equity (law); Materiality (auditing); Actuarial science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.044662862675167635,"score_gpt":0.33050893526195274,"score_spread":0.2858460725867851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1684343192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2285708,0.005329084,0.107560515,0.1755111,0.0015573709,0.000894999,0.0012673254,0.0003852167,0.4789236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97391677,0.0009447228,0.010343453,0.006748681,0.001146075,0.00029809604,0.00010985916,0.000082500555,0.0064098984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9159546,0.038425326,0.008495002,0.009194644,0.021640169,0.0062902337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4833915,0.4180672,0.029132405,0.042605504,0.023601996,0.0032013175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08633988,0.0006168525,0.0022563331,0.002560944,0.0057890466,0.012433003,0.0049112984,0.02003618,0.017897846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39268076,0.001433397,0.0021693965,0.002172053,0.030326426,0.02516152,0.008815145,0.01807719,0.0025805125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009209522,0.000068386114,0.0022362415,0.00011859933,0.00003156076,0.0002877409,0.0014848392,0.0004154158,0.00023113887,0.9805115,0.0040756026,0.0104468595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001153876,0.00007557114,0.002952599,0.00026734432,0.000076756965,0.00055531494,0.0007819617,0.0021883496,0.0006904428,0.9811096,0.011123775,0.000062810526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041617006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029379844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08633988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050972593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010478165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45661438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689194842","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1059","title":"Enforcing the Charter: The Supervisory Role of Superior Courts and the Responsibility of Legislatures for Remedial Systems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Remedial education; Jurisdiction; Culpability; Legislature; Parallels; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Deference; Separation of powers; Equity (law); Luck; Supreme Court Decisions; Economics","score_opus":0.03332838234055772,"score_gpt":0.3061565351946295,"score_spread":0.27282815285407175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689194842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19597091,0.008100477,0.21256477,0.20410818,0.0007599152,0.00015151913,0.00006984728,0.0002865237,0.37798777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98385435,0.0006634182,0.0062225307,0.0024652868,0.00020419573,0.000040604347,0.000006056285,0.000017469041,0.006526009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894168,0.0051684566,0.0002458796,0.0011626704,0.002648363,0.0013577888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823247,0.010498929,0.002398146,0.0016977992,0.0021796431,0.0009007523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017105155,0.00025063704,0.00039704482,0.0010650834,0.004497876,0.00788181,0.0016364121,0.0056510675,0.0025657108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023908129,0.00039096785,0.00041042437,0.000669621,0.034182247,0.0053231763,0.0023989275,0.005713514,0.0002831792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042363195,0.00000858148,0.0007049861,0.000010110412,0.00000340955,0.000044798482,0.0017026004,0.0006032487,0.00011800296,0.99065685,0.0010238556,0.0051194075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054030304,0.000056347355,0.0049893316,0.00018630689,0.000023509197,0.00009835198,0.0018707541,0.0053110803,0.0010324056,0.9349893,0.051345516,0.00004308789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0498984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053163268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0498984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007732636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021447146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099215865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168998060","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Duties of Shareholders and Directors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Shareholder; Context (archaeology); Business; Confusion; Corporate law; Accounting; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.014315678831443952,"score_gpt":0.2813774816877637,"score_spread":0.26706180285631975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168998060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03512222,0.0071672522,0.03173109,0.0921079,0.0014408556,0.000051737745,0.00009293693,0.00005259823,0.83223337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92549366,0.0023472635,0.006800928,0.013675958,0.00091210613,0.00011053723,0.000058220925,0.000035114743,0.050566122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874987,0.005167544,0.0006603829,0.0017938875,0.0035035298,0.0013758765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992156,0.004704942,0.0007323115,0.0010411144,0.0010651392,0.00030033145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009892056,0.00036010446,0.000555188,0.0011198246,0.0056753703,0.00958701,0.0013589504,0.00787383,0.0032163986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02290444,0.00049542874,0.0004353802,0.00090936397,0.021309298,0.0062104054,0.003933505,0.006745057,0.0008884388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013108123,0.000001746073,0.0000486176,0.0000032367511,5.2731895e-7,0.00000874735,0.00054622535,0.000024103334,0.000019180145,0.99677354,0.0011786342,0.0013939899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013909057,0.00001565428,0.0006724749,0.000105895335,0.0000070832284,0.00008398537,0.0006360465,0.0004555258,0.0002879846,0.88523114,0.11247218,0.00001814339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005457931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055278307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009892056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057421145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054659066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052314818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1693191163","doi":"","title":"'Forms Liberate': Reclaiming the Legal Philosophy of Lon L. Fuller","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Legal realism; Philosophy of law; Subject (documents); Law; Legal profession; Legal formalism; Empirical legal studies; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.005818866746776085,"score_gpt":0.19054454165030063,"score_spread":0.18472567490352454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1693191163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01868673,0.047471292,0.010325995,0.3230114,0.002556664,0.000051413343,0.00008682304,0.00006392041,0.5977457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7634651,0.04061136,0.007847087,0.04176945,0.0023475036,0.0001800307,0.00008664889,0.000168505,0.14352442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996756,0.0019153468,0.00006741564,0.00025083686,0.0007612332,0.000249253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717796,0.0019272508,0.00015188708,0.00014163782,0.00037770806,0.0002235602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004231493,0.00037411042,0.00044261152,0.0016972092,0.007462282,0.008516266,0.00090178265,0.0037382944,0.0036438243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005153378,0.0003428753,0.00025650754,0.0013014779,0.03420898,0.008973615,0.0032480422,0.005570852,0.00047923008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032703663,0.000005572479,0.000042135885,0.0000135707605,6.191589e-7,0.000021768068,0.0042137937,0.000040899486,0.000017235569,0.978925,0.014257909,0.0024581058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014434382,0.000013382022,0.0002981224,0.00027744807,0.000004385092,0.00009841839,0.0065699834,0.00025883148,0.0000820676,0.48211023,0.51025605,0.000016638829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0479197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05356892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0479197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014532192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008464675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10543895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1706456921","doi":"10.21991/c92t0v","title":"A FLAWED SYNTHESIS OF THE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.04015784934388064,"score_gpt":0.27051136580826407,"score_spread":0.23035351646438343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1706456921","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012409119,0.008234437,0.55103725,0.183233,0.008092163,0.00042869925,0.0010701645,0.0012612042,0.23423399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50307256,0.0032704065,0.42882603,0.015604722,0.0032721255,0.0011378316,0.0007002888,0.0012868097,0.042829163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627301,0.020355353,0.0030725598,0.0038389608,0.008744915,0.0012581651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666568,0.015963675,0.0011252997,0.0076510306,0.007669539,0.0009337344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03321945,0.00128997,0.0023587537,0.00929887,0.006546927,0.017517531,0.003385604,0.008620302,0.010697759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06256952,0.0015048269,0.0020518007,0.0032597,0.0276187,0.02979732,0.009513023,0.013839627,0.0024918576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007218534,0.000005820736,0.000019040335,0.00002770173,0.00000582229,0.000018402156,0.00072758336,0.00018597626,0.00005786672,0.99343467,0.0022523687,0.0032576367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010747201,0.0000056477893,0.00002324816,0.000072516596,0.0000104837645,0.000020868712,0.00035200224,0.00084581383,0.00018076709,0.9679616,0.03050509,0.000011190678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043306528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034597667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03321945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011659608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017570782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17568332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1708764691","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah13191","title":"Obligation, Greek and Roman","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Obligation; Creditor; Duty; Law; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Debt; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.02414624708067148,"score_gpt":0.2641254399212029,"score_spread":0.23997919284053143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1708764691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013659067,0.01418177,0.0027096884,0.011648092,0.00052945263,0.000013169004,0.000051278344,0.000031817563,0.9571757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9198731,0.006859052,0.002014766,0.0033721183,0.0012308445,0.000053632484,0.00008596109,0.00005289549,0.06645762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980089,0.0010802492,0.000098825054,0.0002485322,0.00038712833,0.00017633491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868685,0.0006480238,0.0001819081,0.00014828525,0.00021120755,0.00012376481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016915834,0.00049660983,0.00038162427,0.001635638,0.0034430744,0.004939745,0.0004694117,0.0013156534,0.0060873176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033623707,0.00015699911,0.00019010947,0.0016091925,0.017205922,0.004415141,0.0027687424,0.0028115297,0.0007697006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041880935,0.0000036929002,0.00007930937,0.000017021754,6.5991753e-7,0.000021946387,0.0016020162,0.00004103023,0.00002431858,0.9933368,0.002143808,0.0027253202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010846751,0.000018084655,0.0005814916,0.00022915934,0.000003247797,0.000153549,0.0022587867,0.00025116725,0.00008779651,0.66885006,0.3275431,0.000012636181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028723627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022378583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060873176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035405888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015725731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025688887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1709175624","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790744.001","title":"Credits","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04394975531791668,"score_gpt":0.24002549708186208,"score_spread":0.1960757417639454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1709175624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004187019,0.00075230194,0.0010047519,0.0061688167,0.0061343736,0.000476561,0.029084872,0.002708345,0.95325124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013820044,0.00060206803,0.00046846573,0.00085669884,0.00078099,0.0002159763,0.011871172,0.0006657298,0.98315674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968928,0.0003050756,0.00018870992,0.00028402187,0.0019329913,0.00039629702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98516756,0.0014538497,0.0006045884,0.0016479901,0.008234687,0.0028913307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002720693,0.0011269335,0.0018925087,0.004595251,0.0018297858,0.0070011956,0.0023644576,0.0033688997,0.93357486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024038343,0.0006799093,0.0008527223,0.0057600695,0.0006405825,0.005090614,0.0030918384,0.002842657,0.8508982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001875114,0.000017076234,0.000067295114,0.00006955091,8.190958e-7,0.000013057851,0.000013631861,0.000027674729,0.000057717712,0.0023290364,0.97465897,0.022726543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012928977,0.000013238394,0.00052938913,0.00007295011,0.0000010670009,0.000027063406,0.00004012277,0.00004540665,0.000040922827,0.0012896702,0.9979206,0.0000067390883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038456114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004883985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93357486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025741984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038246636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1712274727","doi":"","title":"Reforming Illegality in Private Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Academy of Law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Project commissioning; Private law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Injustice; Publishing; Law reform; Common law; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.054363251114998304,"score_gpt":0.37659171812389874,"score_spread":0.32222846700890045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1712274727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1941755,0.0029330605,0.059244815,0.09359005,0.00050109485,0.00031273343,0.00007017454,0.00015416116,0.6490184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776559,0.00084797223,0.005458069,0.0030937225,0.00018365165,0.000092119975,0.000015924867,0.000020146012,0.012632509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822979,0.009031367,0.000839617,0.0014660787,0.003972689,0.0023923686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840274,0.0068670823,0.002071496,0.003637611,0.0024744894,0.0009220365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0147899855,0.00031025475,0.0006650704,0.0018639038,0.0060471385,0.009747743,0.0016453837,0.005999275,0.0028138328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023457326,0.0005086043,0.0007416904,0.0015370343,0.0361077,0.009416743,0.008718614,0.0064125075,0.000426974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020914404,0.000013402086,0.00013714866,0.000012665204,0.000002760496,0.00002334407,0.0009188799,0.00034386644,0.000063908636,0.99571794,0.00032487256,0.0024390712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040214134,0.00008598706,0.001230085,0.00022362791,0.000026054859,0.000088122535,0.0018676234,0.0043194317,0.00068366056,0.92718047,0.06422762,0.000027071304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01262338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01507398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147899855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010954689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02229543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07948226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171313090","doi":"10.29173/alr125","title":"The Jurisdiction of the Alberta Surface Rights Board Under Section 30 of the &lt;i&gt;Surface Rights Act&lt;/i&gt;","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Causation; Tort; Statutory law; Cause of action; Law; Section (typography); Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Liability; Plaintiff","score_opus":0.022607606931141465,"score_gpt":0.27214265887854694,"score_spread":0.24953505194740547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171313090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03396038,0.0038104272,0.005364303,0.013008638,0.0004669579,0.00019981009,0.00039196652,0.0001360823,0.9426614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6143538,0.002642597,0.0080318935,0.008660856,0.0002233783,0.00012703193,0.00040126962,0.000051157967,0.36550802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99138886,0.0006812237,0.0002323862,0.0006330976,0.0049652113,0.0020992504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935116,0.002277075,0.00044738257,0.0004348558,0.0025036435,0.0008254672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047238832,0.00033954837,0.00034941226,0.0017883604,0.006749457,0.006909608,0.0020518075,0.0038320029,0.009358361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006551386,0.0005308859,0.00044646044,0.0012788415,0.0076496084,0.0011013456,0.0020564063,0.0023254072,0.0011217641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003294343,0.000055857894,0.0052355626,0.00010100706,0.000015846505,0.00046781177,0.0036245883,0.0009338469,0.0016712977,0.90930355,0.041705865,0.03685182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006181299,0.000072833995,0.031614985,0.0003502264,0.00007043825,0.0004000243,0.003660698,0.0013712774,0.0015718248,0.060085658,0.9005996,0.00014063281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88942075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9434406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11057925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025263792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.124303915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22246093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1719221636","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564.011","title":"Public interest and private right","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Element (criminal law); Political science; Balance (ability); Declaration; Politics; Relation (database); Private law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Public opinion; Public interest; Law; Public law; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0681113602477066,"score_gpt":0.24023450843503993,"score_spread":0.17212314818733332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1719221636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089213776,0.010639439,0.0017740492,0.013278465,0.00038791724,0.000013604916,0.000029636369,0.000020368621,0.9729643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2549409,0.02140838,0.0037638443,0.022383614,0.0032666482,0.00015570014,0.00013677473,0.00012738914,0.69381666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813133,0.0006608828,0.000052614672,0.0003216407,0.0005578486,0.00027572113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990048,0.0005992861,0.000045692334,0.00015637086,0.00010702392,0.000086788066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001799956,0.0004580541,0.0003816845,0.0010336658,0.002760174,0.00784458,0.0006923477,0.0042471653,0.025841266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002438326,0.00025213262,0.0003263614,0.0012278548,0.016421437,0.0072273556,0.0030854312,0.005917629,0.004753695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.1127185e-7,0.0000025221948,0.00000931525,0.000007940136,2.626118e-7,0.000007773532,0.00019684806,0.000015760199,0.000009999095,0.99116427,0.005560168,0.0030242233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005016196,0.000005720896,0.00013430716,0.0001259236,0.0000015850142,0.00005680933,0.0002608355,0.00006521564,0.000051768613,0.6365598,0.36272916,0.0000038519092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004850061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059691467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025841266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052681114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038589563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086447656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1719263751","doi":"","title":"The Core Nature of Fiduciary Accountability","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Fiduciary; Framing (construction); Confusion; Jurisprudence; Perception; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Core (optical fiber); Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.012588863738747007,"score_gpt":0.33222104394314395,"score_spread":0.31963218020439693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1719263751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06880526,0.008239309,0.31355932,0.099248916,0.001276862,0.00015310627,0.00012663248,0.00033904746,0.5082515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96631014,0.0013397876,0.02050012,0.0060634483,0.0008535853,0.00023043122,0.000035925732,0.00010158762,0.004564938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9614789,0.017246595,0.001759619,0.004931506,0.011656711,0.0029267652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9423388,0.031989057,0.0042281267,0.0113704065,0.008433619,0.0016399818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031879142,0.0005103474,0.0014964247,0.0037827233,0.006284915,0.015525425,0.0029972557,0.007064518,0.0020319682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066754766,0.00081141695,0.00092873647,0.0018103713,0.065982096,0.020495767,0.007068727,0.011806348,0.0005942964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032629273,0.000002307233,0.000061615676,0.000014169605,0.0000015637343,0.000007840872,0.00051521044,0.00007629868,0.00005483756,0.9970529,0.0002733474,0.0019366094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060300845,0.0000073237375,0.00018745915,0.0001045169,0.0000041778458,0.000035396388,0.0001743558,0.000442625,0.00022117533,0.9893217,0.009483951,0.0000112719035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00281186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017503076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031879142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008819125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009439379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16859502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172067189","doi":"","title":"Intuitive Fiduciaries: The Equitable Structure of Family Life","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Legislation; Law and economics; Conceptual framework; Liability; Legitimacy; Intervention (counseling); Business; Structuring; Set (abstract data type); Law; Function (biology); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01185523881386916,"score_gpt":0.2818768857508799,"score_spread":0.2700216469370107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172067189","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09855298,0.0046238597,0.46391913,0.047039367,0.0003463378,0.00021597985,0.00020722322,0.00019812632,0.38489714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97631913,0.00050653605,0.016858738,0.00067000993,0.00008912761,0.00013358869,0.000039102157,0.000024294759,0.005359371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941578,0.0037687575,0.0002150875,0.0006266582,0.00075108145,0.00048054155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942169,0.0024214943,0.0009643142,0.0014286148,0.00054937054,0.00041931664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071395743,0.0003284659,0.0004833968,0.0014283198,0.0051603625,0.0062014153,0.0012729731,0.0025847037,0.005308817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018028075,0.00040435753,0.00055835006,0.0012261507,0.03708381,0.011001232,0.006514001,0.0033678976,0.0004867119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033820534,0.0000025245856,0.00014868377,0.0000062468603,0.0000014257096,0.000015760854,0.0011832683,0.00016875574,0.000018468863,0.99611026,0.00023068993,0.002110464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006503001,0.000011950678,0.0003510114,0.0000314334,0.0000024960843,0.0000615341,0.0005474016,0.00056402606,0.000043065156,0.98802745,0.010346135,0.000007125943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042340877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034526817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071395743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057262112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043881787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04154682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1722070985","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2456792","title":"Deliberate Disregard: Judicial Appointments Under the Harper Government","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009717952048080665,"score_gpt":0.2699948639233722,"score_spread":0.2602769118752915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1722070985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52157897,0.0017216224,0.008619515,0.13545854,0.0010022053,0.00020187504,0.00014815581,0.00010302806,0.33116612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822062,0.00018920477,0.00043495354,0.008141012,0.0003228805,0.00006182968,0.000010908811,0.000023165465,0.0086097615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95908046,0.016267307,0.0012023839,0.0038042618,0.0052805464,0.0143649895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9304651,0.05058807,0.005968905,0.00469367,0.0039195837,0.004364684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034705278,0.0003198561,0.0020973664,0.0018980986,0.019071842,0.011560056,0.0037417412,0.024871098,0.009955407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.123103455,0.00096888747,0.001025441,0.002115495,0.013513028,0.0068442607,0.009481243,0.022635572,0.0010520733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030991706,0.00022538155,0.0108948955,0.00005617584,0.00011304065,0.0020243756,0.017176976,0.0010753218,0.0003274838,0.9241204,0.02810747,0.015568548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002827633,0.00021592478,0.02147861,0.00031378304,0.0003142799,0.0008579967,0.028178886,0.006488093,0.0010845205,0.8614753,0.07909591,0.00021387309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025314877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042314477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97468513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063322694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018353764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18354124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172429429","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2620","title":"Book Notes: Corrective Justice, by Ernest J. Weinrib","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.014715768746560902,"score_gpt":0.2884504512369562,"score_spread":0.2737346824903953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172429429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009229169,0.11735534,0.0044609797,0.6197771,0.03947666,0.00005424692,0.0005152747,0.00019594758,0.2172415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023441399,0.056965146,0.0037139629,0.20030853,0.016655885,0.00012371592,0.00035132188,0.00037088536,0.6980691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988452,0.00027881903,0.000056635152,0.0001558894,0.00059928646,0.00006407678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644345,0.0022066564,0.00011939065,0.00016955244,0.0009358884,0.0001250163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002033902,0.00066444854,0.00036438194,0.0014984559,0.0039152456,0.0035795711,0.0010004996,0.003944412,0.016901106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087465625,0.0003738416,0.0003312584,0.0016161151,0.0041786726,0.0050264625,0.0012522468,0.006535542,0.0058002574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003258075,0.000004437083,0.00004523887,0.000025476833,0.0000010090706,0.000015530382,0.00012671715,0.00004275104,0.000027796194,0.02194559,0.9692727,0.008489492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004446486,0.0000044676617,0.00039390675,0.00018952467,0.0000031790935,0.00006537416,0.0003425753,0.00008905812,0.00009995481,0.031810433,0.9669844,0.000012744346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029695718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08980414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029695718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030003623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042221807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059045732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1728786440","doi":"","title":"Washington Trust Laws' Extreme Makeover: Blending with the Uniform Trust Code and Taking Reform Further with Innovations in Notice, Situs, and Representation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Lawrence College","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Statute; Code (set theory); Law; Representation (politics); Political science; Uniform Commercial Code; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021296405010020093,"score_gpt":0.2750282735567664,"score_spread":0.2537318685467463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1728786440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14891252,0.0032436324,0.11024464,0.26318598,0.0038869726,0.00020673887,0.00017636197,0.0005928392,0.46955025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8508728,0.0010813285,0.020043213,0.035366528,0.0005435223,0.00017479515,0.00007222901,0.00015105202,0.09169448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882345,0.003560931,0.0007016508,0.0013781267,0.0043609575,0.0017638238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874981,0.0047897957,0.00152585,0.0028819796,0.0023431275,0.00096113957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011345352,0.0003043439,0.00026002747,0.001220286,0.006273575,0.012498124,0.0016908725,0.007677167,0.002739089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039667383,0.00068918813,0.00068148115,0.0014200954,0.020423682,0.013775573,0.0067803175,0.012016228,0.0006399482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009070776,0.000012940793,0.00068310415,0.000014138286,0.0000036927395,0.000097664866,0.003136782,0.00022277219,0.00025181528,0.9708689,0.009956132,0.014742988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002891215,0.00010067532,0.0051323366,0.0005980693,0.000040355724,0.00034313917,0.0066372915,0.0023880468,0.002460975,0.36562562,0.6164898,0.00015473532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10050957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13168363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10050957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013913829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021803046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19984913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174363214","doi":"10.29173/alr312","title":"Gain-Based Remedies for Knowing Assistance: Ensuring Assistants do not Profit From Their Wrongs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Wrongdoing; Profit (economics); Law and economics; Action (physics); Business; Public relations; Law; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07643024645626567,"score_gpt":0.33319789152783846,"score_spread":0.2567676450715728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174363214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08924212,0.007996584,0.08247835,0.105081305,0.0010106388,0.00038058177,0.000108852415,0.000473578,0.713228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94245327,0.0018974645,0.009660586,0.008439346,0.0005264799,0.00015482777,0.000023935263,0.00004367634,0.036800396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739765,0.009358425,0.0011821045,0.002219369,0.009501385,0.003762247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614384,0.022573391,0.004081038,0.006211693,0.004219971,0.0014754246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015487207,0.00037994774,0.0008714429,0.0020732759,0.005116988,0.008351521,0.0028040719,0.012041644,0.009600139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05671734,0.00058636174,0.0008163809,0.00078649516,0.015838662,0.01093395,0.0073221023,0.005842309,0.001609043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029261722,0.00005198375,0.0012441488,0.000109827415,0.000020904656,0.00030263248,0.0014507081,0.0007951833,0.0003395177,0.9591487,0.007550586,0.028956447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014865815,0.00032096525,0.0044549797,0.0008968604,0.0001302832,0.0017550499,0.0032190382,0.004531959,0.0022514642,0.7732376,0.20892759,0.00012557587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061753592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009068217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99382466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041636615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013460796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081905186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1746332038","doi":"","title":"The Theoretical Analysis on “Same right & Same price”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalization; Property rights; Urbanization; Government (linguistics); Land development; China; Land law; Property (philosophy); Economics; Land use; Business; Law and economics; Private property; Distribution (mathematics); Market economy; Economic system; Public economics; Land tenure; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Political science; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.02188956249395194,"score_gpt":0.3172197249538173,"score_spread":0.2953301624598653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1746332038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048204273,0.0014020917,0.05506562,0.027973706,0.00033658496,0.00008775334,0.0002173387,0.000045949455,0.8666667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566829,0.00093088544,0.0038631917,0.0022898328,0.00034868278,0.00008188983,0.000065481196,0.000025211039,0.035711985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858093,0.0002948652,0.000040629257,0.0003172914,0.00038879915,0.0003776019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989697,0.00039943462,0.00013019852,0.00014382196,0.0002566722,0.00010030735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018252697,0.00037615618,0.0003956246,0.001445901,0.0032751425,0.0027870717,0.0011461274,0.0029841764,0.025244202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027759876,0.0002466878,0.001017934,0.0011761077,0.012449548,0.006687667,0.0018282153,0.0027257123,0.0011938342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.3655245e-7,0.0000020350024,0.000044235516,0.0000037151603,8.5319135e-7,0.000017220113,0.00006200455,0.000053475127,0.000011589074,0.9990214,0.00040776626,0.0003747289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008623773,0.0000070056044,0.00039949754,0.000022293023,0.0000057218062,0.000056362547,0.00013270596,0.0014139346,0.000052673684,0.98612505,0.011769773,0.000006346613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117729325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007615457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025244202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005687301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028919217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084450305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1748802867","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Law and the Justiciability of Prerogative Powers: A Comment on Black V. Chrétien","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Prerogative; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.017137650876628403,"score_gpt":0.28750455641130995,"score_spread":0.27036690553468157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1748802867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013477167,0.010270136,0.0016574401,0.7827921,0.0025084051,0.00008374745,0.00031080883,0.00007096203,0.18882927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.273298,0.005216833,0.001692932,0.6352617,0.0041785957,0.00019907484,0.0001150127,0.00010721067,0.07993055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894699,0.001971367,0.0003794939,0.0013300193,0.004071261,0.0027779292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988998,0.007754694,0.0005056115,0.00031990642,0.0018432604,0.0005785563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008291936,0.00082748244,0.0011089324,0.001598582,0.02142083,0.010654336,0.005766624,0.04998284,0.004947251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02032172,0.0014242417,0.0019580538,0.0016965227,0.033887938,0.0061320066,0.003244876,0.033553205,0.001373227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004312107,0.000019792484,0.00040225257,0.000090114474,0.000017355123,0.00054931146,0.0067540086,0.00015345532,0.00036901401,0.8562591,0.13283898,0.002503451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019507048,0.00008550858,0.004335592,0.00081229926,0.00009668512,0.00040304993,0.0052526672,0.0008379502,0.0012010525,0.21180712,0.7747117,0.00026122827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68448627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7199029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31551373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0329465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03524512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6347437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750822166","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00888.x","title":"In Defence of Quasi‐Contract","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Liability; Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0988565991060648,"score_gpt":0.35926096953460457,"score_spread":0.26040437042853976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750822166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016647734,0.030987328,0.16994421,0.17886354,0.0019251294,0.00012434387,0.00013327537,0.00012215033,0.6012523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8627357,0.010192141,0.021436375,0.043833874,0.0025895992,0.0006446993,0.00008921154,0.00014989272,0.0583286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97520906,0.015349273,0.0009006255,0.0023206382,0.0049960795,0.0012242526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824536,0.011838231,0.0012943803,0.002598428,0.0014098276,0.00040559476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02447721,0.0006340475,0.0012093529,0.0014699539,0.0052864817,0.008682879,0.002944019,0.011855438,0.005173544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025506776,0.0004791029,0.0015421397,0.0015857914,0.045141272,0.014020782,0.006765046,0.012472532,0.0011275997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012247712,9.4950536e-7,0.0000117860545,0.000007409548,0.0000010711371,0.000006816933,0.0001414856,0.000035088946,0.0000072949097,0.99902606,0.0003367583,0.00042405687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053892322,0.000008561475,0.00004341172,0.000073055344,0.0000029146322,0.000032805627,0.00010962075,0.0002443201,0.00006486618,0.9734952,0.025914893,0.000004925288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035084311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018794226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02447721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068611875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007259763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12944943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W175113025","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Duty of Departing Employees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.011863127333832255,"score_gpt":0.30858965599162286,"score_spread":0.2967265286577906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175113025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046870273,0.0009534902,0.015717743,0.068630904,0.00095656276,0.0000977291,0.00027382886,0.00013298258,0.86636645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8189624,0.00031775335,0.004864427,0.019961257,0.0003968513,0.00013746829,0.00007567946,0.00004551843,0.15523861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99128926,0.0020229325,0.0004730822,0.0016456689,0.002571261,0.0019978534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295443,0.0022476222,0.00065069407,0.0014002525,0.0019974853,0.0007495501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057641007,0.00023027803,0.00034549984,0.0004471144,0.0081910975,0.0063210246,0.0011632169,0.006462596,0.004988694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017259156,0.0003304925,0.00027190303,0.0005516425,0.015679963,0.0032086417,0.0036417264,0.006007612,0.00181558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000899768,0.000006680231,0.00062133366,0.000007904137,0.0000016863244,0.00004891733,0.0024391732,0.00003159533,0.00013250171,0.97935915,0.012437427,0.004904593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039623385,0.000079310696,0.0044933404,0.00020844274,0.00002168211,0.0003603059,0.0034810554,0.00061767205,0.0008870216,0.30126217,0.6884637,0.00008571385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08997866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08813764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08997866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058157397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013959629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17890984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1752552782","doi":"10.5020/23172150.2012.132-141","title":"A estipulação em favor de terceiros revisitada. Doi: 10.5020/2317-2150.2006.v11n1p132","year":2010,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03851223489746663,"score_gpt":0.33638529081381,"score_spread":0.2978730559163434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1752552782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06933452,0.0060409596,0.003049327,0.040920287,0.00092452543,0.00007831581,0.00035305694,0.00016832534,0.8791306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.524958,0.004996774,0.0032779176,0.002960753,0.0003626205,0.000060571885,0.00024852715,0.00017736825,0.46295735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975164,0.0005838585,0.000100521516,0.00026359694,0.0011395452,0.00039611667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602365,0.0009853498,0.0005152065,0.00047825175,0.0014213253,0.0005761807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040652985,0.00023957949,0.00023211005,0.0014557989,0.0053817774,0.008920447,0.0010107885,0.0024559163,0.047083575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008924394,0.0003361678,0.00028181876,0.0020485637,0.003636346,0.0037210544,0.0037494544,0.0022280982,0.0067357607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116354255,0.000108871405,0.021324288,0.00051071256,0.000038226826,0.0020636218,0.03768328,0.00045710942,0.0031150978,0.4534668,0.19291869,0.2881969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010719265,0.000049162827,0.010978706,0.00030295286,0.000023570998,0.00074931234,0.016276106,0.00024782267,0.00075938745,0.016393228,0.954186,0.000022960028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047869276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121989034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047869276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044773957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007844736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15751028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1762879018","doi":"","title":"The Reliance Interest in German Contract Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Law; Conceptualization; Statutory law; Political science; Damages; Scholarship; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023205852548304137,"score_gpt":0.34285158392211823,"score_spread":0.3196457313738141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1762879018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07484974,0.017941365,0.0508969,0.024447376,0.00043932843,0.00004150501,0.00013924204,0.000056927085,0.8311876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681105,0.004177336,0.0030306554,0.003541864,0.00026260133,0.00004482424,0.000044234133,0.000020151832,0.020767853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983277,0.0005198164,0.000086494336,0.00025444463,0.0005994468,0.00021209865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989027,0.0006526876,0.00010966258,0.00012530322,0.00015754737,0.00005211956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002992624,0.00029595656,0.00018295285,0.001251632,0.0018251792,0.0034842435,0.00050343346,0.0019950096,0.0020299174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003548698,0.00025797836,0.00019456161,0.0011027919,0.01390791,0.003955561,0.0016498907,0.0022350494,0.00047359988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016432064,0.0000014199638,0.000040766616,0.0000054039424,5.7995936e-7,0.000018387049,0.00039793763,0.000067420915,0.00005172867,0.9971259,0.00060344784,0.0016852875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007562401,0.000013452668,0.0005424298,0.00007522254,0.0000049401,0.00013475015,0.00032743058,0.0004999341,0.00029696012,0.9093791,0.08870703,0.000011065356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00409537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025237843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043647084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043647084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015117797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031668365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774663677","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005622","title":"Comparative History and the Internal View of French, German, and English Private Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"German; Law; Politics; Dialectic; Political science; Dualism; Legal science; Legal history; German idealism; Sociology; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020968831279057194,"score_gpt":0.28548350600428607,"score_spread":0.2645146747252289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774663677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18528043,0.017079312,0.0030738479,0.029249322,0.000256647,0.000017019374,0.00021968623,0.00006292459,0.76476085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97744715,0.001941713,0.00023974726,0.0011065974,0.0001300874,0.000010131463,0.000058722788,0.00002361234,0.019042123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974782,0.0010352283,0.000057723428,0.00028379215,0.0004446448,0.0007005319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978358,0.0011670125,0.00022793334,0.00015247743,0.00039519812,0.00022164654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026649246,0.00021784996,0.00026836843,0.0036419441,0.00776692,0.013533861,0.00072260975,0.0018407502,0.0071792947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040549426,0.00020423644,0.00023284594,0.0026383784,0.022201095,0.0064252284,0.0023235418,0.0015691373,0.00035590504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010840508,0.000004724918,0.00038513017,0.000021589274,0.0000032282446,0.00013683869,0.025509425,0.0000735118,0.00009341801,0.9664383,0.0020287368,0.0052942457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019736783,0.00004753229,0.012400044,0.00044079914,0.00003149862,0.0004309584,0.05939614,0.00042258584,0.00045110713,0.15669979,0.76961625,0.00004358403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13413756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10473268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13413756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024311576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049013784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26671362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177687042","doi":"10.29173/alr183","title":"The Problematic Revival of Murder Under Section 229(c) of the Criminal Code","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Conviction; Criminal code; Jurisprudence; Mens rea; Supreme court; Jury; Homicide; Political science; Recklessness; Accidental; Parliament; Pretext; Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine","score_opus":0.030181309641119345,"score_gpt":0.33755211983474503,"score_spread":0.30737081019362567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177687042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25205117,0.007287221,0.015236055,0.12027734,0.0024048837,0.00014497925,0.00013010204,0.0002340671,0.6022342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316158,0.0013376715,0.0027500386,0.031831883,0.0008609494,0.00007131469,0.00003417284,0.00009175817,0.031406473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821592,0.004198255,0.0007498484,0.001746859,0.0087143695,0.0024315775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848322,0.009228443,0.0014438556,0.00094150315,0.003068334,0.00048575603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010683789,0.0002899225,0.00045566156,0.0013102263,0.0076770918,0.009677027,0.0028357909,0.0103869615,0.0015140263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031356473,0.00043791824,0.00064097764,0.0006971469,0.01494347,0.0030069007,0.0033351646,0.010602554,0.0005912112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020856245,0.00002412091,0.001269514,0.00006451558,0.000011139466,0.00083041703,0.014162386,0.00032995048,0.0008692684,0.9380789,0.016283194,0.028055685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005949574,0.00037990604,0.018305905,0.0015018411,0.00010324665,0.0042720707,0.02976146,0.0028253696,0.0062061003,0.23185854,0.7043787,0.00034734138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10257345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14359339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89742655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010680388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013958592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20395285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778739224","doi":"","title":"The Donoghue Diaries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law; Commonwealth; Dozen; History; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007773237761991072,"score_gpt":0.26797457757147986,"score_spread":0.2602013398094888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778739224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003969798,0.006882664,0.0012565667,0.036241777,0.015809802,0.00020522378,0.0055697015,0.00014980139,0.9299146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04043078,0.0039162156,0.0011726115,0.013227141,0.0016627386,0.0002991156,0.002346242,0.000546563,0.9363987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891007,0.00024454386,0.00005461883,0.00018821578,0.00042388757,0.00017863387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839765,0.0008243251,0.00008497906,0.0001361276,0.00033799838,0.00021891121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008133306,0.0005008696,0.0003186101,0.0019117311,0.0042091934,0.0049119904,0.0006623129,0.0012046426,0.06400833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006562278,0.00038455834,0.00016341016,0.0025484376,0.002226303,0.002520611,0.002156371,0.0036693139,0.018668728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036979833,0.000015982221,0.0001577607,0.00007163767,0.0000010152114,0.00009169818,0.002087624,0.000033096298,0.00023671075,0.0679842,0.9121056,0.017177701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012500451,8.6407766e-7,0.00013280634,0.000035969242,1.7786549e-7,0.0000106142425,0.00032314457,0.000008608736,0.00005030243,0.0010850222,0.99834776,0.0000034502245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026485533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07230041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06400833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070328023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038823406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21412921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785794553","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Duty and Members of Parliament","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Parliament; Duty; Law; Accountability; Political science; House of Commons; Politics; Commons; Prerogative; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04414369158671966,"score_gpt":0.30143395230978165,"score_spread":0.257290260723062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785794553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011538101,0.2516807,0.0071431007,0.09379002,0.0035287337,0.00012482803,0.00015318759,0.000055471293,0.6319858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7014107,0.1140754,0.0082554985,0.049616713,0.0025708617,0.0002388671,0.00023984523,0.00008145433,0.123510584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95098597,0.018733524,0.0023671978,0.002972273,0.020585183,0.004355874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97846794,0.009517617,0.002271617,0.0011155936,0.007390548,0.0012366262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022072436,0.0003628321,0.0010041771,0.0049478593,0.008583221,0.0067436,0.0021893845,0.0051556695,0.0034379372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043577168,0.0005705443,0.0005433573,0.0042263004,0.017127698,0.004250377,0.0028014425,0.004974772,0.0009923466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011377444,0.000007755829,0.0004949955,0.00036410656,0.000013272233,0.00007341534,0.0022797834,0.00018511614,0.0000835752,0.94258374,0.024608891,0.029293973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000136662975,0.000021763231,0.0046654996,0.0016508308,0.00003101112,0.0001705098,0.0017680109,0.00012750478,0.00019088872,0.11782028,0.8734925,0.000047539892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36889493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46177894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96556157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034438442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.067318015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7334955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792010912","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000583x","title":"A Particle of Freedom: Natural Law Thought and the Kantian Theory of Transfer by Contract","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Doctrine; Philosophy; Freedom of contract; Epistemology; Social contract; Normative; Contract theory; Obligation; Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Natural (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.01669162336942738,"score_gpt":0.2765781785476249,"score_spread":0.25988655517819753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792010912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036853194,0.040441554,0.12615061,0.25474158,0.00180586,0.00007724901,0.00019254306,0.00014781942,0.53958964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319786,0.0074051465,0.01745012,0.014388708,0.002051532,0.00016921718,0.00006732304,0.00010179319,0.026387496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946179,0.0028922965,0.000118889024,0.0006595803,0.0012510179,0.0004603787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963965,0.0024979182,0.00023162998,0.0003794576,0.00027338477,0.00022110085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007140513,0.0005046839,0.0006517684,0.002499174,0.0052510994,0.0067951786,0.0019060822,0.0069622463,0.0036152555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056668813,0.00040926127,0.000979299,0.0019019118,0.06470853,0.015305369,0.0035673177,0.00867857,0.0005695804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016974665,0.0000022309944,0.000009928841,0.0000033381473,5.606674e-7,0.000005640061,0.00026047725,0.00007588464,0.000005415419,0.9988053,0.00044995485,0.00037965633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031189404,0.00000171376,0.00002075883,0.000012545954,6.456561e-7,0.000005873249,0.00009071434,0.00020471978,0.000009141375,0.9933688,0.006279424,0.000002502633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075404183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042432835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010320221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010320221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043597734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07487875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179692219","doi":"","title":"The Corporation, Directed And Produced","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.01321939642426303,"score_gpt":0.23434022043415076,"score_spread":0.22112082400988772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179692219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012808375,0.008937582,0.0014254679,0.056385696,0.031096864,0.00009882109,0.0005970634,0.00032742767,0.8998503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008769601,0.0019158486,0.00040783692,0.004881439,0.001280813,0.000030796906,0.00020978056,0.00009169232,0.98241204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979069,0.00022531603,0.0000620586,0.00033264255,0.0012986492,0.00017437544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777126,0.0002178954,0.00017266856,0.00018091318,0.0013287435,0.00032847206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011305274,0.00047089646,0.00032172198,0.0009991127,0.0022097046,0.006755249,0.00050648215,0.0031063214,0.1109465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007938982,0.00027135247,0.00017503282,0.0012070575,0.0011737277,0.0026236263,0.0013875788,0.0036447227,0.044395734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014179859,0.000006557986,0.0001358895,0.000039892046,0.0000019169065,0.000041805826,0.00009148935,0.000026538957,0.00018338235,0.085162096,0.8848287,0.02946758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025205004,0.0000058473315,0.000089332534,0.000020577681,0.0000012463004,0.00001927634,0.00003859257,0.000015677711,0.00008730993,0.00075922586,0.99895835,0.000001992215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011798489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019702101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1109465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035247211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073167672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37115306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798224845","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1417","title":"Civil Disobedience and the Law: The Role of Legal Professionals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.011053417162402088,"score_gpt":0.28739608919688375,"score_spread":0.27634267203448165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798224845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027152017,0.02326056,0.007903072,0.6077408,0.0019360459,0.000075873104,0.000019444466,0.00005546497,0.33185667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75694746,0.022129009,0.0036963497,0.13331488,0.0034618578,0.00015779778,0.000020708378,0.00008339111,0.08018854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825501,0.008627454,0.00047595662,0.0010969643,0.0029690324,0.0042804466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95456886,0.034369513,0.002555266,0.00067497056,0.0026959856,0.005135398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017028907,0.0005057951,0.0006574769,0.003037818,0.020199409,0.017492602,0.002002325,0.028008275,0.008763562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045126192,0.0005350867,0.00060266966,0.0017379044,0.044287205,0.010712661,0.0068157255,0.013302028,0.0011469633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016459722,0.00008753233,0.0021461567,0.00010068609,0.000008226725,0.0015880789,0.030352678,0.00017781855,0.00017826477,0.88743395,0.05874538,0.019164696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035776855,0.00016900201,0.0050067366,0.0016212709,0.000033064523,0.0027320997,0.070463695,0.00080354424,0.00048275775,0.4905597,0.4280072,0.00008521587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022002684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042440955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028008275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009465953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02634841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090058565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798359168","doi":"","title":"The Liability Immunity Scheme in the Administrative Accountability System of China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Principle of legality; Liability; Punishment (psychology); Government (linguistics); Function (biology); Business; Good faith; Sovereign immunity; Law and economics; Construct (python library); Law; Public administration; Political science; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07035035866987117,"score_gpt":0.3696268352917677,"score_spread":0.29927647662189655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798359168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6766131,0.0010035733,0.039052695,0.023744283,0.00040785997,0.0007783605,0.0005915935,0.0004618716,0.2573466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97381115,0.00014038452,0.0054719956,0.0010784796,0.00008156975,0.00018170103,0.00010697567,0.000012098134,0.01911564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933656,0.0013763494,0.0005464088,0.0009200258,0.0021592628,0.0016323834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958099,0.0007540025,0.0005445371,0.00056384294,0.0017244185,0.000603382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068327608,0.00025000292,0.00031714758,0.0014943171,0.0041966387,0.003876976,0.0012928483,0.0029315252,0.0043272474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007983877,0.000400056,0.0006622466,0.0009858435,0.004096862,0.0025882942,0.0028028002,0.0023990008,0.00041090162],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004867936,0.000055596014,0.0112534985,0.00005198998,0.000030038802,0.00033349547,0.0011119887,0.0031545477,0.0010174364,0.9634757,0.0052174204,0.014249584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006240028,0.00037116808,0.10075189,0.00027851932,0.0002839471,0.0006338895,0.0012558694,0.07744821,0.004200108,0.61762977,0.19611715,0.00040551423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078455634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053522788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078455634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010490245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028835086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15599793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1821142045","doi":"","title":"Unwritten Constitutionalism in Canada: Where Do Things Stand","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Extraterritoriality; Political science; Constitution; Secession; Democracy; Supreme court; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Politics; History","score_opus":0.01843114013165977,"score_gpt":0.27637092386779094,"score_spread":0.2579397837361312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1821142045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14178829,0.022931255,0.007267613,0.3401898,0.0007884903,0.000118210795,0.00047810812,0.00014157724,0.48629656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428549,0.00684839,0.002395621,0.018188577,0.00017300504,0.00003918307,0.00012488842,0.000053061125,0.029322525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867378,0.0015486499,0.00024428836,0.00097555475,0.005132042,0.0053617405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916814,0.0027597805,0.0005263337,0.000376643,0.003225532,0.0014303393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046514506,0.0003256835,0.00050864473,0.0028201,0.027093995,0.012930565,0.0020843947,0.003802971,0.004423476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020991368,0.00038549336,0.0004103113,0.00557356,0.026325796,0.004435445,0.0041915104,0.0073709665,0.00023629212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001682512,0.0000123102145,0.0029383497,0.000064878535,0.000011997431,0.00031810257,0.009443842,0.00042000134,0.0001858398,0.94405293,0.020618552,0.021916356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053884538,0.000028832661,0.030543119,0.00079715974,0.000088023044,0.0002919111,0.034989957,0.0025218881,0.0010349829,0.3911143,0.53831595,0.00021992892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99581003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17000413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17000413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22095665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96267754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1823028455","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.020","title":"Trust law as fiduciary governance plus asset partitioning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Corporate governance; Asset (computer security); Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.02933226815802039,"score_gpt":0.24074503718873674,"score_spread":0.21141276903071635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1823028455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009943878,0.006742888,0.049622957,0.04094786,0.0008069026,0.00004526732,0.00005709009,0.000093667164,0.8917394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81205374,0.0054795174,0.007806063,0.009412829,0.0013497104,0.00015109057,0.00007776704,0.000114260125,0.16355488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969343,0.0011740181,0.00011959365,0.00035472025,0.001019373,0.00039806805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982241,0.00082017784,0.00022441518,0.00029023955,0.00031381752,0.00012728682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028266166,0.0003706418,0.00028489146,0.00083376566,0.0026092452,0.0077438434,0.00082136324,0.0036370093,0.004675953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063845688,0.00026277668,0.00040549782,0.0010222805,0.018469308,0.009552174,0.0021471984,0.0042631994,0.0011239236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.871187e-7,0.0000013259219,0.000016110127,0.0000033620045,3.6062733e-7,0.000008599224,0.00027644364,0.000058975063,0.000009401024,0.99662673,0.0016320819,0.0013660805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037938362,0.0000053955237,0.000087498556,0.000051930594,0.0000022957558,0.00004821735,0.00026513575,0.0005475434,0.000069591224,0.9224785,0.07643524,0.0000049353894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007461555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049402113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077438434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006902766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004417225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05008334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18233132","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660643.003.0006","title":"Punishment and Disgorgement as Contract Remedies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Breach of contract; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031176931064890476,"score_gpt":0.2737984705954415,"score_spread":0.24262153953055102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W18233132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024125718,0.0077717663,0.1431124,0.041689817,0.0007068999,0.00024541075,0.000107704334,0.0001773028,0.782063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84471494,0.005404288,0.031171415,0.008672564,0.0005417118,0.00038048852,0.000049984636,0.0000922636,0.10897235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98879427,0.003929177,0.00052943075,0.0010937613,0.004107112,0.0015462725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975057,0.0011282335,0.00033647422,0.00041470362,0.00041417932,0.00020068239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006452338,0.00071694294,0.000872518,0.0015509807,0.004881974,0.007527915,0.0020121043,0.008784575,0.0055583976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007250528,0.00046668612,0.00085851,0.00092354964,0.046023883,0.008144353,0.0062390263,0.0075783096,0.00063989055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.576862e-7,0.0000031074167,0.000017031876,0.0000046849586,7.095254e-7,0.0000094100305,0.00020015595,0.0001273621,0.00002550261,0.9985001,0.0002318911,0.0008790743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011266045,0.00001731175,0.00019108554,0.00008407038,0.0000060750604,0.00007007014,0.00032128347,0.00062139187,0.00014890828,0.95726335,0.04125018,0.000014940194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013514592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015882479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013514592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095149595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012333643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069036186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182545986","doi":"","title":"Bankruptcy in Crisis - A Regency Saga","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislation; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Political science; Economics; History; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.015863895045829742,"score_gpt":0.3032716756762472,"score_spread":0.28740778063041744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W182545986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010940032,0.27552107,0.0010845539,0.5301104,0.03566208,0.000068914145,0.00011022022,0.0000958157,0.1464069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21204524,0.18809474,0.0012199226,0.3547729,0.031949144,0.00017029274,0.00021283164,0.00017882968,0.21135613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988205,0.0004896218,0.00005830758,0.000079649224,0.00019884061,0.00035298266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870765,0.00056081533,0.00015379058,0.000041392526,0.00027124392,0.00026506672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027748581,0.00055395585,0.0006134511,0.0019577548,0.007459994,0.006486763,0.00082711433,0.008700294,0.0037329935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033775305,0.00032061507,0.00059694774,0.0017229837,0.006712817,0.006294338,0.004125606,0.008370283,0.0015050446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030422652,0.000076880366,0.0015679712,0.00032460052,0.000014058904,0.0010546772,0.009849235,0.00024022214,0.0002062401,0.22142406,0.72995895,0.03525272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032353682,0.000039802217,0.0019736052,0.00071638013,0.0000047396097,0.00036686147,0.0047806823,0.000083568026,0.000058949325,0.010381183,0.9815772,0.000013746963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009192651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030731572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009192651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036676025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035416603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026610494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1828715469","doi":"10.1017/s0008197315000306","title":"THE MODERN FUNCTIONS OF THE ECONOMIC TORTS: REVIEWING THE ENGLISH, CANADIAN, AUSTRALIAN, AND NEW ZEALAND POSITIONS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Harm; Liability; Function (biology); Law; Phenomenon; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.04985250084441758,"score_gpt":0.2863151102956585,"score_spread":0.2364626094512409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1828715469","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10083203,0.4476709,0.0023040331,0.097061895,0.0019380256,0.00008672186,0.0003509122,0.00003531782,0.34972012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65771693,0.30590713,0.00276664,0.0072763157,0.001343146,0.000034567867,0.00012534102,0.00004314251,0.02478675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564457,0.00060228445,0.0002281806,0.00025405933,0.0024914017,0.0007795092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884248,0.0035014683,0.0011042316,0.00022077978,0.006089696,0.00065912853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005217249,0.0004684888,0.0004948808,0.0130191855,0.006844666,0.0057751024,0.001489021,0.0016893076,0.0030193788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011757868,0.0003461059,0.0003486674,0.013159139,0.02269828,0.0035983487,0.0012572453,0.003213303,0.0002449859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033026023,0.00003952083,0.006611296,0.0015038553,0.000029481413,0.0011297992,0.06401587,0.0006970405,0.00050594116,0.7562993,0.051170934,0.117963985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000727115,0.000028826575,0.075159594,0.0048911045,0.000086132015,0.00062024983,0.042737637,0.00088023767,0.0002844088,0.027785221,0.84741706,0.00010227766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9526303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9750837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08024416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08024416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061947607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58221483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840251136","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567751.003.0010","title":"Philosophical Foundations of Proprietary Remedies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Plaintiff; Law; Unjust enrichment; Constructive; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.07363486617077286,"score_gpt":0.3356004789627711,"score_spread":0.26196561279199826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840251136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011211885,0.010088748,0.11409805,0.038029112,0.0005778337,0.000077478326,0.000118198266,0.00010020791,0.8256986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921702,0.0060033915,0.026297525,0.006358224,0.001269775,0.00021637522,0.00007956388,0.0000890059,0.067515984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99072194,0.004205108,0.00041580194,0.00080992753,0.003457736,0.0003894528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893818,0.007228699,0.0006201284,0.0010701588,0.0014907457,0.00020854003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008568597,0.0004835051,0.00047736603,0.0017742553,0.0031906911,0.006330515,0.0013373763,0.0057647983,0.0055327476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013050256,0.0004910907,0.0005893239,0.001173977,0.034692723,0.010816632,0.0033334482,0.00850623,0.00097368425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.808248e-7,0.0000015892563,0.0000072869057,0.0000052239625,5.413936e-7,0.000007944735,0.00014528919,0.00006254862,0.000010678033,0.99896586,0.00028361997,0.00050893927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027875965,0.0000030279396,0.000028341627,0.00004553261,0.0000017378411,0.000025227548,0.00009363111,0.00040029094,0.000064486325,0.9838471,0.015483946,0.0000037950808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025108363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016594328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008568597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071544517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003003763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051909387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842792250","doi":"10.14324/111.2052-1871.028","title":"Internal Goods To Legal Practice: Reclaiming Fuller With MacIntyre","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Business; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.040872166261681886,"score_gpt":0.3787752246125979,"score_spread":0.337903058350916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842792250","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044370275,0.012174754,0.02103843,0.51604146,0.0011515515,0.0000794516,0.00005991096,0.0000764607,0.4050077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314911,0.004794351,0.006948885,0.02617365,0.0012736446,0.0002013846,0.000026882715,0.000111279434,0.028978884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900247,0.0056319293,0.00029712933,0.0011963913,0.0020064004,0.00084349577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867431,0.0087783495,0.0009616947,0.0011609527,0.0014692026,0.00088668964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011419555,0.00054666423,0.0006827029,0.0026933954,0.010164825,0.018025756,0.0017861079,0.0076683452,0.003924639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018297186,0.0005183749,0.0005360993,0.0018533177,0.072806485,0.018812513,0.012200803,0.009877029,0.00046629325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004083972,0.000010742854,0.00012189704,0.000017142294,0.0000014251927,0.00003079701,0.007454463,0.00006346513,0.000019209321,0.9861702,0.003857506,0.0022490786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019513966,0.000019762847,0.0004902894,0.00034366682,0.000007988081,0.000063246414,0.0063013784,0.00044363883,0.00012408535,0.83938104,0.1527808,0.000024613984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017962297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015050538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018025756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013450832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007977614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09759307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847878306","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Solution: Recent Developments in the Law of Directors’ Duties in the Context of Financially Distressed Corporations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Creditor; Insolvency; Duty; Corporation; Law; Context (archaeology); Companies Act; Shareholder; Corporate law; Commonwealth; Business; Business judgment rule; Supreme court; Accounting; Corporate governance; Political science; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.05785189667741133,"score_gpt":0.330934282237167,"score_spread":0.27308238555975567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847878306","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0115181375,0.110393025,0.0024184426,0.65728533,0.0049497476,0.000040551862,0.0003327589,0.00006128494,0.21300074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46580082,0.19480439,0.010084546,0.20636056,0.006920061,0.00007559394,0.00038889764,0.00013640964,0.1154288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914302,0.0012987528,0.00031531267,0.001113716,0.0042781527,0.0015638589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98235184,0.0045214836,0.00089735823,0.00061494927,0.008941314,0.0026729328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008143078,0.00046811005,0.00062638073,0.0034333612,0.016574575,0.012311815,0.0029356857,0.009956788,0.008586785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02076424,0.0006108912,0.000726571,0.0059407116,0.020644639,0.007752165,0.0036566972,0.012060737,0.0006163803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023111608,0.000023638439,0.0011439123,0.0001561825,0.000010665791,0.00037224215,0.0037115302,0.0003583423,0.00020686717,0.8354143,0.12407082,0.03450842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021810352,0.000016346825,0.0060037076,0.000527273,0.000024496328,0.00022444938,0.0030958555,0.00051406503,0.00019297701,0.057612844,0.9316403,0.0001258281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97157794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13348976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13348976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1690767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9685405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850139930","doi":"","title":"Tort Law and Happiness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Tort; Damages; Plaintiff; Law; Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Liability; Psychology; Normative; Economics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08445209808036379,"score_gpt":0.3742443986249524,"score_spread":0.2897923005445886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850139930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02907761,0.01270434,0.002348169,0.09020809,0.00053376687,0.00002289665,0.00019868067,0.000036386013,0.86486995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81063986,0.008242579,0.00065955817,0.007173385,0.0006058709,0.000035826415,0.00011182732,0.000043025164,0.17248818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979054,0.000935525,0.000067934634,0.00017138154,0.0004203021,0.0004995463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764866,0.0008721289,0.00026739278,0.00022287661,0.00054751645,0.0004414641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017432285,0.00021605776,0.0003903124,0.00090156955,0.0049747345,0.009392094,0.00044209833,0.0034083189,0.0204419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005563561,0.00016614236,0.00029738207,0.00083016296,0.011899263,0.0031570646,0.0049871155,0.0026704853,0.002988866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012973931,0.000018231676,0.0010589114,0.000026172693,0.000006433093,0.00007241877,0.0015834256,0.00014523014,0.000039901548,0.9562188,0.029817512,0.0110001005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081911585,0.000028088733,0.00624128,0.00027006282,0.000012433538,0.00016329129,0.006008122,0.0003619572,0.00013259445,0.68052554,0.3062242,0.000024241195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012848098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016349934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0204419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003834623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038935593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068384945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858628525","doi":"10.4324/9781843147701","title":"The Law of Obligations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.035811282385961644,"score_gpt":0.32937956322692835,"score_spread":0.2935682808409667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1858628525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017728619,0.0061627547,0.0071237464,0.011456892,0.00054870645,0.00002237253,0.000054379736,0.000035567457,0.9728228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.338458,0.019186338,0.009587687,0.011270945,0.0032378975,0.00035361762,0.00022397032,0.00020387089,0.61747766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975642,0.000819248,0.00008559578,0.00027134837,0.0010462845,0.00021331268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841416,0.0009137952,0.00010239522,0.00018086805,0.00029657787,0.00009219987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016277916,0.00047190228,0.00036267927,0.0010610345,0.004259256,0.008594265,0.0008337216,0.0025516637,0.010958971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047687953,0.00033738112,0.00035234052,0.0009214077,0.01592865,0.0070056166,0.0031721431,0.0046241665,0.0026672932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8968745e-7,0.0000015829634,0.000015048329,0.000009407678,4.4003565e-7,0.0000074065274,0.0004997536,0.000037006306,0.000014926253,0.988967,0.0076069,0.0028398247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002385961,0.0000047561266,0.00015110768,0.00015681305,0.0000020351704,0.000047632282,0.0005083481,0.0001781467,0.00006070264,0.5489857,0.44989765,0.000004822251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004946122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00411496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010958971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053815935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046008658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039046407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18604158","doi":"10.4040/jkan.2008.38.3.483","title":"Indefeasible Title in British Columbia: A Comment on the November 2005 Amendments to the Land Title Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Land registration; Statute; Government (linguistics); Real property; Law; Political science; Public interest; Business; Land tenure; Geography","score_opus":0.019289165968534323,"score_gpt":0.2790156053745076,"score_spread":0.2597264394059733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W18604158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029759428,0.00872819,0.0014724664,0.61002076,0.011961814,0.00038957002,0.0026951886,0.00046998376,0.33450255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.071453,0.0020356113,0.0009194165,0.7030067,0.0016427835,0.00033460377,0.0003953775,0.00013510288,0.22007741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98627067,0.0014027198,0.0010661696,0.0012637271,0.0053398646,0.004656845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844344,0.008111219,0.0008163037,0.0009027695,0.0043245438,0.0014107496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011791698,0.0009748427,0.0014442715,0.001843262,0.027270304,0.01020889,0.006013811,0.053965382,0.010923858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024844857,0.002107998,0.0013423727,0.0033218598,0.007630311,0.0028337503,0.0036402526,0.034635477,0.003720657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013392008,0.00010282296,0.0041345707,0.00015965039,0.000032280714,0.0010702533,0.005997648,0.0004554642,0.00078957074,0.11224238,0.86233926,0.012542162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012744023,0.000055695175,0.016305568,0.001001899,0.00011811523,0.00019844479,0.004362404,0.0007704703,0.00080686325,0.008166983,0.96778417,0.00030200725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94906723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97584915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053965382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050522815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09677467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3665704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863183068","doi":"10.1108/ijlbe-11-2014-0034","title":"The acceleration dilemma: can English law accommodate constructive acceleration?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Law; Damages; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Originality; English law; Nomothetic and idiographic; Breach of contract; Dilemma; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0584758481953842,"score_gpt":0.3352275647461609,"score_spread":0.2767517165507767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863183068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12685388,0.0044916556,0.020602828,0.11166635,0.0011424872,0.000179885,0.000060008428,0.00008162119,0.7349212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95604223,0.0014418997,0.0034952278,0.01666736,0.00048187134,0.000117537995,0.000022672068,0.00004759701,0.021683652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.979738,0.008396385,0.000977269,0.0020129476,0.005623887,0.0032516292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606152,0.02777532,0.003089555,0.0027012816,0.00444329,0.0013753058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021329464,0.0004891584,0.0007560199,0.0017443408,0.009867036,0.015158841,0.0032184967,0.01097952,0.009166586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05827219,0.0006638302,0.00076224736,0.0012756567,0.032568224,0.017616237,0.007229258,0.0096532805,0.0011540557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015663703,0.000023531975,0.0012623381,0.000051212042,0.0000049061096,0.00097069953,0.011501746,0.00016441547,0.00010751589,0.97719085,0.0030196353,0.0056875576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006693357,0.000112140115,0.00384541,0.0013423355,0.000047624562,0.0021389555,0.045255415,0.0020374118,0.00064349844,0.6869714,0.2574429,0.00009598734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026702905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0321099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026702905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010263172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017333314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11280233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1872345973","doi":"","title":"Choice of Law for Unjust Enrichment: Rome II and the Common Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Common law; Choice of law; Civil law (Civil law); Unjust enrichment; Comparative law; Political science; Scots law; Public law; Municipal law; Rule of law; Private law; Sources of law; Conflict of laws; Restitution","score_opus":0.02427874144362789,"score_gpt":0.3117497525974943,"score_spread":0.2874710111538664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1872345973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07118185,0.015360098,0.028206216,0.10310016,0.0018746769,0.00015797922,0.0001524063,0.000077084675,0.7798896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921872,0.0036161738,0.012895286,0.029451761,0.001098955,0.00022073502,0.00013717885,0.00009953824,0.060293127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98848325,0.004337777,0.00062667154,0.002011473,0.0026652722,0.0018756046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443084,0.00326088,0.00077046873,0.00067241286,0.0004829657,0.00038242806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007969505,0.00034220127,0.00073414145,0.0012601094,0.0045435317,0.012526504,0.0011905471,0.0068050013,0.002440752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01058557,0.00054874615,0.0011037177,0.00093163014,0.028584884,0.005479823,0.0036924968,0.00965359,0.0006911449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013434267,0.000008776502,0.00023747334,0.000017155491,0.000003652594,0.00008745383,0.000687903,0.00016491582,0.000059312817,0.99189067,0.003909854,0.002919322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000758056,0.000099680125,0.0032078158,0.0005872497,0.000029755225,0.00034760573,0.001921327,0.0010232195,0.0006807672,0.7783439,0.21358104,0.00010181107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015854659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020449037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015854659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009359179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073759886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0679059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873932661","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.008","title":"The re-imagined trust","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Sociology; Library science; Commercial law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03620456780716233,"score_gpt":0.24599537126215834,"score_spread":0.209790803454996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1873932661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009604776,0.012248653,0.006872864,0.28885457,0.013803458,0.000027302198,0.00012908687,0.00013519055,0.6683241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5238163,0.006415354,0.001842707,0.03451641,0.003003898,0.000052135914,0.00009829339,0.00023323509,0.4300216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620444,0.0013778115,0.00013985689,0.00048548458,0.0010084866,0.00078387506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623245,0.0009893468,0.00024972626,0.00064540125,0.0009479295,0.00093514967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031319046,0.0002411254,0.00033407245,0.00043492083,0.005779688,0.010316929,0.0012675263,0.0045863865,0.014503546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010376909,0.00025579808,0.00038096582,0.00046933134,0.015806176,0.01341073,0.004908565,0.0068024457,0.0033849382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046135115,0.000001672094,0.00006370208,0.000018818018,0.0000018157991,0.000094303,0.0040542707,0.000038718266,0.000019404317,0.9051752,0.0859249,0.004602721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032668122,0.0000044928656,0.00012472348,0.00015359007,0.000003359825,0.00018824027,0.0033734436,0.00010083312,0.00003837116,0.08029992,0.9156994,0.000010246385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033610895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07013303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033610895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010808074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012337918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07841849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188289234","doi":"","title":"Concepts and principles in unjust enrichment : a comparative study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Epistemology; Political science; Taxonomy (biology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21143543527517564,"score_gpt":0.46455757867133984,"score_spread":0.25312214339616423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188289234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23668069,0.031091798,0.004536562,0.01425468,0.0002999312,0.000113740236,0.000037214777,0.00001583602,0.7129695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97749615,0.010223063,0.0013524062,0.0011455256,0.000098988174,0.0000863084,0.000034697652,0.00001510182,0.009547886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99459356,0.003521722,0.00016551922,0.00031229324,0.0009259324,0.00048094316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962365,0.002732967,0.00028939935,0.0001371277,0.00039191407,0.00021215757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006548791,0.0003760212,0.0006668218,0.0053902757,0.010231083,0.009482748,0.0012086873,0.0037149906,0.00529829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065975487,0.00036156765,0.00041232049,0.0061476636,0.032962427,0.015115827,0.0068009095,0.0043087103,0.00027616028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001555631,0.0000785185,0.0007765181,0.00015744855,0.0000059527088,0.00028722134,0.12774475,0.000078180165,0.00012359797,0.85688907,0.0015273613,0.012315753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026231475,0.00012801787,0.011208938,0.0014256898,0.00002576455,0.0009511725,0.4162765,0.00070304354,0.00026987,0.26819292,0.30075407,0.00003776709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009346768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014721481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013062029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013062029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041481126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0947721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883317298","doi":"10.21083/surg.v4i1.1095","title":"The development and effects of the Ontario Farming and Food Production Protection Act, 1998","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SURG Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Nuisance; Business; Government (linguistics); Production (economics); Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.01568017544420445,"score_gpt":0.2469182020156531,"score_spread":0.23123802657144865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883317298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014817496,0.0026339863,0.0011334687,0.039120533,0.0003875919,0.0005949994,0.0044158488,0.00007405092,0.93682206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2342295,0.00510458,0.008338798,0.025579905,0.00028755178,0.0008659672,0.003129855,0.0000786665,0.7223852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98715615,0.0007070266,0.00037572178,0.00037696972,0.009054593,0.0023294692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921266,0.001065641,0.0004336731,0.00035263356,0.0050522666,0.00096913695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040854537,0.00037015064,0.0003682035,0.0017714292,0.010591126,0.0046806736,0.0018841209,0.0042687026,0.0102730375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011016631,0.0007933733,0.00052412506,0.0021289333,0.0050421194,0.001115197,0.0018546546,0.0032148105,0.0017181861],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007665312,0.00011793129,0.008457454,0.00029535659,0.000023391485,0.0005705494,0.0075331023,0.0006183874,0.0012954473,0.488901,0.45892617,0.033184618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038118287,0.000022458906,0.02258232,0.00020416552,0.000016019123,0.000055367873,0.0009340571,0.0002623538,0.00018279022,0.0046333517,0.9710316,0.000037292633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08481339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08481339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22652279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6153671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891487589","doi":"","title":"Reforming Judicial Review at the State Level","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Judicial review; State (computer science); Political science; Position (finance); Law; Judicial activism; Common law; Judicial opinion; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.02507024301001042,"score_gpt":0.32969639299927295,"score_spread":0.3046261499892625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891487589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13312155,0.029061638,0.097310536,0.26718867,0.0028273098,0.00036110287,0.00013712606,0.0005473995,0.4694446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93414426,0.0053820657,0.017065383,0.020889767,0.0018795917,0.00014161076,0.000037729445,0.00004808442,0.020411484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96652424,0.015037325,0.0018173357,0.0044917036,0.008176767,0.003952635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95137775,0.027236179,0.00337468,0.00407435,0.011991896,0.0019451618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0303394,0.00017630651,0.00070284726,0.0026771277,0.0062056896,0.013261696,0.0019380711,0.0062127872,0.0027357058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03606202,0.0005715028,0.00074566336,0.0016307328,0.0105495285,0.0063909786,0.0035842906,0.007588235,0.0008337589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010464876,0.000030197432,0.00094120455,0.00006806031,0.000023942988,0.00006256904,0.0012216766,0.00096511096,0.00050496316,0.9658942,0.005608348,0.02466925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085536805,0.00022845952,0.007414605,0.00080261525,0.0001134342,0.00025124365,0.0016416317,0.0087510245,0.0020146098,0.7034819,0.27506945,0.00014549885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02687038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044385325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0303394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014375301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033269368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16045201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897746625","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495175.015","title":"Areas of legal indeterminacy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; CLARITY; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Morality; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic; Biology","score_opus":0.03605391527842726,"score_gpt":0.23971164739363196,"score_spread":0.20365773211520471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897746625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009826954,0.025124956,0.055227276,0.0597053,0.00096928905,0.00008118343,0.00012997979,0.00010915801,0.8488259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88103145,0.010627924,0.01788249,0.008367135,0.0023128612,0.00032257717,0.00010600664,0.00016460601,0.079184875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281293,0.004084905,0.00028396872,0.00085710693,0.0014054837,0.00055570755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920941,0.005099455,0.00047107562,0.0012882637,0.0007740341,0.00027307196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009941058,0.0006206888,0.00087849563,0.0020114281,0.0051897424,0.014591248,0.0018264663,0.0051728743,0.010371465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017019523,0.00061374705,0.0005136793,0.0021031497,0.0463071,0.015997898,0.006322139,0.009311064,0.0011245222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.996508e-7,0.000001801389,0.000010596118,0.0000048011575,3.8455235e-7,0.000006757235,0.0003427854,0.000028877692,0.000009228069,0.99681133,0.0011546538,0.0016278323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020055368,0.0000017466532,0.000029287963,0.000042154403,8.441697e-7,0.000020821863,0.00026151672,0.00010619945,0.000026903303,0.9752374,0.024268724,0.000002422182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002534318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002786682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014591248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065438203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005183916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05257398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899114343","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1305","title":"The Constitutional Dimensions of Aboriginal Title","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06174705072543573,"score_gpt":0.382995987188844,"score_spread":0.32124893646340824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899114343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06856515,0.01762048,0.006583165,0.029865406,0.00035975745,0.000046800884,0.0001675488,0.00002678468,0.87676483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685808,0.003708628,0.0017322011,0.0030163312,0.00021275686,0.000051826042,0.000050993807,0.000012905236,0.022633482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950677,0.001672614,0.00021054996,0.0006246658,0.0014521076,0.0009723279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961016,0.0020289312,0.00034639193,0.00039486075,0.0007770733,0.00035114068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004604997,0.00016073545,0.00034392436,0.0016080077,0.007069276,0.0072677745,0.001380026,0.0025768161,0.004038676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006967117,0.00034653448,0.0002973625,0.0017862066,0.029289326,0.0036920654,0.003445521,0.0045610536,0.0002507293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020639109,0.0000015998023,0.0002806456,0.000018251343,0.0000018593851,0.000031193787,0.0026173978,0.000029843766,0.00005037464,0.994875,0.000482923,0.0016088746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002859818,0.00003968329,0.011100649,0.0006157915,0.000046551184,0.00028718123,0.008184993,0.00028258495,0.00043497805,0.7137853,0.26514968,0.000044104047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22064777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31677347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77935225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01331747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016937869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4387269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899570945","doi":"","title":"Constructive Trusts and the Deemed Agency Limitation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Unjust enrichment; Premise; Supreme court; Express trust; Agency (philosophy); Law; Confusion; Law and economics; Settlor; Proposition; Business; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Restitution; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010069217217499893,"score_gpt":0.2766190479962005,"score_spread":0.26654983077870065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899570945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06702857,0.0039034912,0.086640485,0.05032138,0.0008114598,0.00025731523,0.00013479442,0.00016118771,0.7907413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643102,0.00064997014,0.0074455766,0.0074421507,0.00019046708,0.00018842249,0.000026898988,0.000024097108,0.01972214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812429,0.0054316185,0.0011729326,0.002191473,0.0071618846,0.002799179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909723,0.0042165224,0.0010636249,0.0015034745,0.0016725686,0.0005714922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009571547,0.00056875474,0.0007004547,0.001446387,0.0074704806,0.006698734,0.0018020184,0.008856915,0.0041687256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017291568,0.00060389953,0.0013415132,0.00080510025,0.057384364,0.007305585,0.00889415,0.008217874,0.00057651417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028724392,0.0000027050492,0.00006434321,0.000010888143,0.0000028578208,0.00006136277,0.0004923961,0.00007152604,0.00007541647,0.99767226,0.00049588125,0.0010474726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031611504,0.00004183537,0.0004189344,0.00012913943,0.000018238004,0.00034698335,0.0007083711,0.0003498309,0.00079887273,0.9370979,0.060016606,0.000041733238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02382169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025390998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02382169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009898035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016871428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07181561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900911969","doi":"","title":"Weather, Leather, and the Obligation to Disclose: Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc. (c)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prospectus; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Issuer; Political science; Statute; Business; Law and economics; Economics; History","score_opus":0.022300021670255393,"score_gpt":0.2654372180379261,"score_spread":0.2431371963676707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900911969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08672347,0.00965069,0.001604305,0.31517375,0.002381465,0.00017745771,0.00059804023,0.000116295065,0.58357453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6438453,0.003741196,0.0009314282,0.19052628,0.0017497013,0.00009202528,0.000114768285,0.00006412439,0.15893513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507165,0.0006417644,0.00023266695,0.00055650197,0.0022227261,0.0012748009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965006,0.0017753253,0.00027400823,0.00017157252,0.00093179365,0.0003465629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033443612,0.00030046536,0.00032617882,0.0004855331,0.009582944,0.006009622,0.0018179908,0.014621056,0.0023204188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010665806,0.00059670035,0.0005594896,0.00059126044,0.007527046,0.0017983031,0.0011860959,0.007679543,0.0005309716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009004654,0.000039531576,0.0059841466,0.00013173347,0.000034626464,0.0041303723,0.028383108,0.00048310522,0.0023235416,0.5841214,0.35952535,0.014753049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010360523,0.00006614351,0.020127056,0.0005388303,0.00016285531,0.000991356,0.008694696,0.0010400454,0.0019157231,0.03510614,0.9310029,0.0002505876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8712231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94276947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12877691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032673676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037223633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25907058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903345289","doi":"10.21991/c9tt12","title":"Abdelrazik: Tort Liability for Exercise of Prerogative Powers?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Tort; Liability; Strict liability; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05324074836314739,"score_gpt":0.3134082847570873,"score_spread":0.2601675363939399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903345289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031049442,0.014338579,0.014490127,0.3411705,0.003158009,0.00014912209,0.00050421763,0.0001392109,0.59500074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7387008,0.005909659,0.0066704997,0.056877468,0.0036070438,0.0003697736,0.00013700113,0.0001039268,0.18762392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264824,0.0016961651,0.00055150397,0.0010062297,0.0021431642,0.0019547034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944208,0.0035841882,0.0004788584,0.00042335063,0.00090010365,0.00019267954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067234063,0.0008770955,0.0013525139,0.0018071221,0.006993122,0.009142896,0.0039771744,0.049137782,0.014152167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024050968,0.0012236667,0.001274486,0.0013181317,0.011306017,0.016603064,0.0051841424,0.015746841,0.002275022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001622209,0.000012427567,0.000060514383,0.000019096544,0.0000067244678,0.00012928895,0.0003251759,0.00013739511,0.00008100863,0.9836236,0.01355204,0.0020364956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053392967,0.000017450497,0.00067985756,0.00018442783,0.00003420286,0.0003980641,0.00067009265,0.0011040283,0.00045497122,0.9269062,0.06942105,0.00007615067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015121038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017331643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049137782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006044442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071614627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04734373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905011711","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2755","title":"Disclaimers of Contractual Liability and Voluntary Obligations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Disclaimer; Obligation; Business; Law and economics; Liability; Law; Skepticism; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.011527023319363389,"score_gpt":0.2828612464763391,"score_spread":0.2713342231569757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905011711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016057093,0.0074126627,0.04174998,0.058666553,0.002311051,0.00029119698,0.000234155,0.00013514371,0.8731421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75606054,0.0066344435,0.025808122,0.02970913,0.0043627415,0.001203628,0.0002723448,0.0001815605,0.17576757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95984274,0.01549018,0.0032719285,0.0044151056,0.01373512,0.0032449402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94861627,0.030661073,0.005402269,0.0077111204,0.006585558,0.0010236835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022006646,0.0006496366,0.00078955665,0.0017958883,0.007759192,0.007612999,0.0029008812,0.013645613,0.009579809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060959864,0.0008121325,0.00092798163,0.0021116543,0.037373897,0.007951117,0.0063932925,0.008237804,0.0025950181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032533148,0.000005664858,0.00006123073,0.000019118515,0.000002045311,0.00005327042,0.0007146626,0.000060911916,0.000033397,0.9936778,0.0033194828,0.0020491427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001571391,0.00001792397,0.00034988066,0.00024168927,0.000008454041,0.00025546737,0.00047736193,0.0005131637,0.00023804707,0.8631038,0.13475049,0.000027913278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008914981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058641066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022006646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063591725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010886383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11638367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908306056","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v20i2.93","title":"CIVIL LITIGATION NEGLIGENCE AND THE MALAYSIAN ADVOCATE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Sanctions; Common law; Duty; Adversarial system; Political science; Civil litigation; Civil procedure; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.010984879505898368,"score_gpt":0.26570876436968294,"score_spread":0.25472388486378456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908306056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10639346,0.033010207,0.0014801737,0.40473363,0.0028698896,0.00003438636,0.000013497367,0.000021927954,0.45144284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87734824,0.006003588,0.0005811301,0.048935436,0.0010954741,0.00002183588,0.000004346202,0.000011520293,0.065998465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959734,0.0016949284,0.00013604216,0.00029458845,0.00095561147,0.00094534695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721247,0.0011197187,0.00051421777,0.00011923418,0.00038713048,0.0006471362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045508724,0.00022543634,0.00016873736,0.00076019776,0.008943143,0.0067467242,0.0008072451,0.0053269677,0.0035350549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007518647,0.0002838858,0.00020538039,0.0004701548,0.01122466,0.003609405,0.004128826,0.0068750954,0.00071289256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020144113,0.000036092355,0.0028086596,0.000065530316,0.000004286431,0.001174784,0.029691665,0.0001057932,0.00017380132,0.91944724,0.026838962,0.019633181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020239931,0.000091120564,0.004891631,0.0009580148,0.000016199683,0.004429136,0.025817981,0.00075015455,0.00044368426,0.11806945,0.8444606,0.00005184294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007737566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019884208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008943143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005928787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007059074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043016553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911595472","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567751.003.0007","title":"Unjust Enrichment: Nearer to Tort than Contract","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Damages; Duty; Tort; Law; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Breach of contract; Business; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.023934110313687102,"score_gpt":0.34448544262272696,"score_spread":0.32055133230903987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911595472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081308216,0.0046719876,0.05807427,0.032885797,0.000501605,0.00006883786,0.00007779357,0.00013535969,0.82227623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96569556,0.0013831252,0.004901751,0.0041136513,0.00023532566,0.00005073312,0.000040527742,0.00005111737,0.023528237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953053,0.0018790044,0.00017740761,0.0006735317,0.001457587,0.0005071708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641657,0.0016938504,0.00049434335,0.00052885903,0.0006063826,0.00025996013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003497271,0.00034434628,0.00058017496,0.0017674548,0.0035286425,0.007450738,0.00069511886,0.0031803332,0.0119002275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063123126,0.0003120828,0.000476482,0.0012823414,0.030485937,0.012724109,0.0058513945,0.005331606,0.0007259187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047302315,0.0000055885466,0.00010034889,0.000009334461,0.0000010907612,0.000020155072,0.00048119097,0.000117577125,0.000047842073,0.99726593,0.0003570103,0.0015892233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059014346,0.00001174422,0.0005130496,0.00006403079,0.0000058381793,0.00008502066,0.0007415383,0.00036971804,0.00014817888,0.9686406,0.029405108,0.0000092455775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037922752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025892262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119002275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005605673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029253936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040672183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924644488","doi":"","title":"The 'PPSA': Continuing the reconceptualisation of retention of title (Romalpa) security","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Security interest; Lien; Legislature; Perfection; Accounts receivable; Business; Debt; Statute; Property (philosophy); Publishing; Project commissioning; Tangible property; Law and economics; Law; Property law; Economics; Accounting; Property rights; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05981142648466718,"score_gpt":0.24275514738509368,"score_spread":0.1829437209004265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924644488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07838833,0.006113699,0.07297108,0.21944648,0.0022271771,0.000278397,0.00015693561,0.0002942944,0.62012357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8655501,0.001949828,0.023660999,0.03847551,0.0015052612,0.00038514752,0.00008619025,0.0001638881,0.068223186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97707456,0.011992906,0.0011722947,0.0023398853,0.0061575463,0.0012628327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824677,0.008195855,0.0015570323,0.0035316658,0.0033198227,0.00092797796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03110742,0.00031113953,0.0007149963,0.0011424822,0.004737405,0.01278223,0.0035216997,0.009137356,0.0024928497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02933085,0.00067086116,0.0007781038,0.0010188766,0.029928688,0.013254965,0.009391934,0.0131941335,0.0006344168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006696879,0.000009884508,0.00017451803,0.00003255301,0.000003603865,0.00006981556,0.0069057625,0.0001171862,0.00017800338,0.9778389,0.004701921,0.009961079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033940298,0.00013784022,0.0022098469,0.0007110018,0.000027682727,0.0003716334,0.0062673837,0.0017342863,0.0010880339,0.36778846,0.619551,0.00007894306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022055537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021841686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03110742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009349139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023159204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16451377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W193000733","doi":"10.29173/alr103","title":"The Alberta Court of Appeal Opines on the S.E.F. No. 44 Limitation: The Status Quo and the Unresolved","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Manning Diversified Forest Products (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Status quo; Ambiguity; Law; Discoverability; Status quo bias; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Law and economics; Court decision; Settlement (finance); Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02785123681787295,"score_gpt":0.29926522237002173,"score_spread":0.2714139855521488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W193000733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023025898,0.004792775,0.0046672975,0.50089616,0.0076772757,0.00031699508,0.001609272,0.00045408358,0.45656025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1730953,0.001976781,0.005475319,0.4476888,0.0019601167,0.00024791315,0.00042190455,0.000111212656,0.3690227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98828083,0.00073594536,0.00049781246,0.001207693,0.0060936855,0.0031839963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910465,0.004024084,0.00023464095,0.0003508528,0.0035662036,0.00077774137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011491108,0.0006884919,0.0011357395,0.001884486,0.015862115,0.011161399,0.0063533,0.046909064,0.010376909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018335795,0.0017230774,0.0018478534,0.0016810201,0.00852851,0.0024811435,0.0025170266,0.025598366,0.0028027482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004618531,0.000042291496,0.0016328362,0.00006656451,0.0000255954,0.00055607245,0.0018461064,0.0003048502,0.0007425996,0.66051877,0.32294443,0.011273673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117241994,0.00009324304,0.007959988,0.00044888747,0.00018049538,0.00029506104,0.002116153,0.0009761901,0.0012542001,0.06410192,0.92214596,0.00031060865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8468047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9213224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15319532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027995514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07989565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.308195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935777987","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12005","title":"The Indirect Influence of Politics on Tort Liability of Public Authorities in English Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Politics; Law; Political science; Liability; State (computer science); Ideology; Tying; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03873999164966311,"score_gpt":0.32544327532297485,"score_spread":0.2867032836733117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935777987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3157873,0.16028407,0.0030306084,0.0834196,0.00065747125,0.000041934716,0.00008298783,0.000011289181,0.43668473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703194,0.020783566,0.00014067124,0.0043351823,0.00053490105,0.000014045656,0.000008844598,0.0000059680256,0.0038574056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936415,0.0062403763,0.00038807877,0.0006440656,0.0020471564,0.001316288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603639,0.03296195,0.0035215237,0.00049993483,0.0019795077,0.00067314523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073421136,0.00014887666,0.0004879929,0.0019542957,0.0029196509,0.0043772445,0.0005613661,0.0026112662,0.0037354892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021222616,0.00034989446,0.00040158897,0.0012861835,0.0134733645,0.002600965,0.0031457653,0.0032631396,0.000333687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008727286,0.00006221201,0.013914029,0.00093027955,0.00012402887,0.0011531148,0.015444146,0.00070114824,0.0012937818,0.9279817,0.006155972,0.03215242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018360012,0.0005272916,0.26540643,0.0072172848,0.0007810997,0.0019468724,0.025589766,0.0012688637,0.0034476786,0.3513959,0.3420866,0.00014862443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009460577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021144567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009460577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047870344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055367346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038829267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936271412","doi":"10.21153/dlr2009vol14no2art146","title":"Crown Immunity in a Food Crisis: A Consideration of the 2008 Listeriosis Outbreak in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Law; Criticism; Fell; Government (linguistics); Political science; Listeria; Public health; Listeria monocytogenes; Sociology; Medicine; History; Biology","score_opus":0.03384199023218695,"score_gpt":0.3054331807311877,"score_spread":0.2715911904990007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1936271412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22371286,0.026673315,0.00060908584,0.56267834,0.0016324377,0.00019267944,0.00033986697,0.000042927102,0.18411848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85857785,0.0143146785,0.00058289926,0.09658904,0.0005917111,0.000045827852,0.00012715557,0.000024115841,0.029146701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949008,0.00037944887,0.000091529284,0.00020770224,0.0015903949,0.0028300001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935759,0.0018439557,0.00046683053,0.00008109885,0.0026437792,0.0013885617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003203785,0.00034006897,0.00048526615,0.0021164264,0.028310645,0.01037658,0.0026813324,0.012055551,0.0025783349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011561157,0.0004006508,0.00060531887,0.0032505535,0.009011525,0.0023072714,0.002753373,0.008134498,0.00012658618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001633521,0.00021697662,0.03870682,0.0005794326,0.00009190817,0.012649903,0.064628504,0.0036138396,0.0011548714,0.47523314,0.3509999,0.051961273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012287998,0.00012379899,0.14553703,0.0011820887,0.00021727502,0.0011373507,0.15443335,0.004195933,0.00073201343,0.037399016,0.6545255,0.00039377017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15111972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15111972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27944648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W193895850","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1089","title":"Something to Talk About: Regulation and Justification in Canadian Municipal Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Public law; Local government","score_opus":0.024350225491007123,"score_gpt":0.3172517836076514,"score_spread":0.29290155811664426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W193895850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16211931,0.006554848,0.010599986,0.11847378,0.00028898573,0.000089249625,0.00021203143,0.000110402456,0.7015514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98246187,0.00089323166,0.001353724,0.0019499903,0.000030019106,0.000018098648,0.00003232315,0.000017041586,0.013243755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936371,0.0013772376,0.00014813026,0.0006692478,0.0022845934,0.0018836998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958482,0.0014640132,0.00031624723,0.00023533727,0.0015466439,0.0005896321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043420955,0.00025285437,0.0005057855,0.002228205,0.031470254,0.013328792,0.0020233786,0.004216567,0.0047913254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01173201,0.0003599548,0.00044083397,0.00425571,0.040322065,0.0038374441,0.004023852,0.004903046,0.00025026692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000648431,0.000008178235,0.0017039948,0.000025019048,0.0000038192393,0.00007710004,0.0162333,0.00031392937,0.00008801735,0.9698536,0.004638199,0.0070483084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042057825,0.000024069346,0.024198905,0.00043264646,0.00006691211,0.000165218,0.05640194,0.0039275605,0.00069601374,0.45163396,0.4622397,0.00017086182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98684597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99055135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1623405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1623405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17683089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97156626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1952372749","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Mixed Legal Systems: A Challenge to Comparative Trust Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Trust law; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Comparative law; Private law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Substantive law; Commercial law; Choice of law; Convention; Public law","score_opus":0.026263872655850014,"score_gpt":0.32019518113281215,"score_spread":0.29393130847696214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1952372749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019165915,0.27995113,0.095907554,0.3762614,0.006765684,0.00008696374,0.0003404018,0.00008397331,0.221437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78621984,0.10612888,0.04531771,0.031246813,0.015950114,0.00047858508,0.00035248592,0.00020653395,0.01409912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799769,0.015212753,0.0006509709,0.0012362851,0.0021828192,0.0007402771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94633174,0.04601925,0.0020969359,0.002462507,0.0021272046,0.00096235453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019128738,0.00043095354,0.0018331243,0.003991226,0.0042981673,0.013273133,0.002672898,0.005535033,0.0063942284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037343323,0.0004170833,0.0012597811,0.005372512,0.038067818,0.039179064,0.007535492,0.009312445,0.00053277187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002402886,0.0000022588335,0.00006906222,0.00005023071,0.0000057778125,0.000016587202,0.00081670115,0.000044139542,0.0000055899095,0.9921355,0.0030268882,0.0038249278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003864281,0.00001067063,0.0002837996,0.0003470846,0.000006535061,0.00008517496,0.0018043667,0.00027014982,0.000014765408,0.9528962,0.044269145,0.000008244123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031148337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044493214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019128738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008531535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031579938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101163626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963547191","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1139","title":"Functionalism and Political Economy in the Comparative Study of Consumer Insolvency: An Unfinished Story from England and Wales","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Ideology; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economy; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.03833989309812411,"score_gpt":0.3380792953903343,"score_spread":0.2997394022922102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963547191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73453003,0.01244986,0.00090721407,0.025180923,0.00015033748,0.000024253013,0.000056130364,0.0000056172544,0.22669558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98735785,0.001919124,0.00012400998,0.0010916549,0.000030113195,0.000018771123,0.000015166245,0.000010402227,0.009432995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959429,0.002787327,0.00008975858,0.00013095165,0.00035772054,0.00069138256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995378,0.003571564,0.00026015317,0.00013569774,0.0003726933,0.0002818829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003218801,0.0001746767,0.00052380963,0.0030587735,0.008235973,0.0071182433,0.0006042496,0.0018990103,0.004692331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005713276,0.00026930193,0.00018704418,0.0042491243,0.018241266,0.004758683,0.0040995455,0.0025076463,0.00019824223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068158704,0.000028958582,0.0036048442,0.00014830238,0.000009623737,0.0013937161,0.4632159,0.000114635266,0.00026885403,0.51813173,0.002329613,0.010685743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021913505,0.00007949086,0.038160946,0.0006422475,0.000016686186,0.0008863117,0.71400124,0.0002747258,0.00025900215,0.042884544,0.20272467,0.000048243495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13780932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2357636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13780932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014809271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035779558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2740144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963957161","doi":"10.1093/ojls/20.4.683","title":"Private Law and Private Narratives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Private law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0344943461739869,"score_gpt":0.3392931067860214,"score_spread":0.30479876061203454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963957161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079263486,0.0072879265,0.011068482,0.06520506,0.0003308408,0.00003467957,0.00036229595,0.00006620723,0.836381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723371,0.0011526488,0.0007539654,0.0005511291,0.00014866465,0.000019672592,0.00006297379,0.000035281933,0.024938514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775994,0.0010965633,0.000069106005,0.0002730192,0.0003691421,0.00043216348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918915,0.005431072,0.0006085297,0.00084945763,0.0004983071,0.0007211684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003339123,0.00043894304,0.00042433754,0.001918074,0.009396561,0.016009267,0.0009771177,0.0050750845,0.016151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010399889,0.0005497749,0.0002484183,0.0030047942,0.05373851,0.014198465,0.0056189974,0.004102046,0.00085479626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023605508,0.0000019254683,0.00008901243,0.0000055802807,5.304196e-7,0.000015750527,0.0066308663,0.000023042432,0.000007727329,0.99175066,0.0009618313,0.0005107051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010525524,0.0000037231391,0.0005300163,0.00005863918,0.000004853083,0.00005507664,0.015552966,0.0002528753,0.000064523774,0.92543536,0.05802398,0.0000074462528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062035684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06865143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062035684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012125567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008129026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12334919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964402934","doi":"10.7202/042177ar","title":"Le dol d'un locateur peut·il être sanctionné par une diminution du loyer?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Economic rent; Principal (computer security); Humanities; Philosophy; Welfare economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.010087929854050959,"score_gpt":0.2470876940524831,"score_spread":0.23699976419843213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964402934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083119534,0.0076553337,0.017295985,0.24064885,0.0029814362,0.000092478156,0.00022721058,0.00033572153,0.6476435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72334373,0.0029413148,0.006292398,0.01171533,0.0009681618,0.00007397744,0.00007406815,0.0001459793,0.254445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966174,0.0010585503,0.00010450058,0.0005133055,0.00096509035,0.00074121193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968656,0.0009834417,0.00042812192,0.00046677937,0.00088981626,0.00036617185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003955875,0.0003866575,0.00054658036,0.0007700091,0.005233459,0.006774537,0.0015867763,0.006958607,0.030756025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011660026,0.00034112786,0.00042109797,0.00068444887,0.010017055,0.005775973,0.0034464493,0.004496454,0.005601873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012655623,0.000059347618,0.0038069822,0.00013301994,0.00002504983,0.00085995306,0.004987577,0.00034617924,0.0011024948,0.89529824,0.040204868,0.05304972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053799482,0.00010185813,0.005122066,0.00040294585,0.000023002962,0.001303132,0.009093008,0.00074967794,0.0011794197,0.11844292,0.863443,0.00008516622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03026832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040546663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030756025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036636405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004944421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10288918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965454850","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2003.tb00208.x","title":"Confidence and the constructive trust","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constructive trust; Law; Declaration; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Commonwealth; Computer science; History; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.037412194110403495,"score_gpt":0.3505393579168602,"score_spread":0.3131271638064567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965454850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06239829,0.010244568,0.13538194,0.14787705,0.001425151,0.00020404966,0.00014079337,0.00012200652,0.6422062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98114955,0.0012201807,0.0049532494,0.005667704,0.000486216,0.00010631076,0.00001535884,0.000025784484,0.006375702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700162,0.016292652,0.0016557788,0.0029863114,0.0066241515,0.0024249454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94450074,0.03697462,0.0063168285,0.0054258853,0.004655943,0.0021259554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025893934,0.00051805825,0.00085619505,0.0025041397,0.0064350776,0.013415809,0.0017900408,0.00938131,0.004470996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06293241,0.0006393773,0.0009580252,0.0016020141,0.097873,0.014555332,0.012486877,0.011390217,0.0005931287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030526774,0.0000027255185,0.000089174886,0.000012313547,0.0000030219678,0.000024513669,0.0005894047,0.000054624234,0.000019264171,0.9977234,0.0003323813,0.0011461453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013042401,0.000015159608,0.000146479,0.00006671569,0.000005286651,0.000073445524,0.00035379178,0.00017821521,0.00008143957,0.9877072,0.011347847,0.000011256064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035238857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00202903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025893934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059964033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006241827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13694191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965653143","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748697748.003.0007","title":"Scottish Trusts in the Common Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Trust law; Common law; Creditor; Blind trust; Testamentary trust; Settlor; Position (finance); Law; Express trust; Voting trust; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.06781442915246685,"score_gpt":0.2820911261788428,"score_spread":0.21427669702637595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965653143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043602698,0.026078343,0.006321409,0.04047417,0.0010776726,0.00003871163,0.00012131544,0.000117683914,0.882168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86527497,0.010449885,0.0015673864,0.0035230038,0.000490037,0.000023266044,0.00009371085,0.000044055254,0.118533716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972761,0.0007106655,0.000128737,0.00020829227,0.0011491418,0.0005270315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981838,0.0007207568,0.00018199411,0.00019519847,0.00048186287,0.00023636571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030455305,0.00028666353,0.0003833623,0.0010866015,0.0048560714,0.008485929,0.0006471913,0.0020574087,0.0084554795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005321284,0.00022168108,0.00035210277,0.0019474687,0.010962337,0.006868909,0.0032763397,0.0022485007,0.0011569473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005793924,0.0000087818,0.0002625636,0.00003622861,0.0000029893706,0.00016063236,0.0060044145,0.00008177864,0.000060979,0.96540105,0.012750939,0.0152238365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010032494,0.000033944998,0.002571945,0.00028533363,0.000017167857,0.00030017953,0.0055291113,0.00035072613,0.0001784151,0.25705022,0.733645,0.000027866156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061713614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06503318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061713614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009675761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065393117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1227088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965960295","doi":"10.7202/045721ar","title":"Crown Ownership of Water in situ in Common Law Canada : Public Trusts, Classical Trusts and Fiduciary Duties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Statutory law; Law; Legislation; Private law; Common law; Public law; Business; Argument (complex analysis); Civil law (Civil law); State (computer science); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Duty; Mathematics","score_opus":0.025613192125192114,"score_gpt":0.23995217233967792,"score_spread":0.2143389802144858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965960295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39570993,0.002969294,0.017374834,0.044872787,0.00013993024,0.000109379274,0.0003063586,0.000065704,0.5384518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98588413,0.00039769334,0.0010853291,0.00072055147,0.000013677105,0.000011786961,0.000018595683,0.0000066223433,0.011861766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996807,0.00040872386,0.00007972241,0.00028460065,0.0012295834,0.0011903775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700963,0.0009465517,0.00033874257,0.0002697641,0.0009385735,0.00049669336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002038984,0.00020269086,0.00030046966,0.00090969756,0.009167448,0.007442365,0.0014595232,0.0017768093,0.002826583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005530885,0.00026934867,0.00029948584,0.0015765467,0.027883649,0.0033037034,0.0031144,0.0028424491,0.00010673876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058782953,0.000009250159,0.002055005,0.000015613448,0.0000043603904,0.000111452995,0.0056043854,0.00041369192,0.00011578308,0.9849145,0.0018584359,0.0048916494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033462973,0.000048310543,0.039940022,0.0003725555,0.00006443609,0.00031089253,0.043375205,0.008546741,0.0014392787,0.68393826,0.2217147,0.00021620377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9757382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077119246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.077119246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0956014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55954194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966575687","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpn073","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal confirms that irreparable harm must be demonstrated in injunction cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Harm; Damages; Interim; Federal court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Supreme court; Economics","score_opus":0.10254589870254925,"score_gpt":0.33497271280187485,"score_spread":0.23242681409932558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966575687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034187313,0.0023593472,0.006381785,0.17216612,0.00347101,0.00041918852,0.0033159768,0.0007912415,0.77690804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40132523,0.0030230698,0.010013908,0.24249704,0.0009940233,0.00033153023,0.0013144716,0.00023200815,0.3402688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836073,0.0005202515,0.000624738,0.0012771714,0.009614516,0.004355977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98147166,0.0061219945,0.0002739798,0.0007075354,0.01015576,0.0012690342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008056552,0.0009929895,0.0011294548,0.0032848653,0.030737065,0.009045142,0.0048908517,0.023682613,0.0119773615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024277458,0.0013859516,0.002313381,0.002826622,0.0070640426,0.002297853,0.0027655975,0.019299861,0.0022266433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008339677,0.000074285344,0.00485452,0.00013022384,0.00007032725,0.0017139075,0.004194361,0.0005826441,0.0013391806,0.4898186,0.48438287,0.012755664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015989007,0.00008002753,0.014764981,0.0004795339,0.00047799066,0.0006339577,0.003513059,0.0022417803,0.0033266176,0.032803614,0.94099295,0.0005255922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05244372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05244372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15359192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3805076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966818484","doi":"10.7202/043939ar","title":"La fiducie : réflexion sur la réception judiciaire d’un nouveau code.","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011358980030974837,"score_gpt":0.2652562665504538,"score_spread":0.25389728651947896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966818484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030847218,0.02314292,0.008718094,0.18259399,0.0035043485,0.000057012396,0.00015697927,0.000106007305,0.7508734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6992762,0.0036266397,0.0018680725,0.022158558,0.00068641687,0.00006358498,0.000047153128,0.00014633033,0.27212715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114627,0.0032458596,0.00015870463,0.0009254352,0.0025858132,0.0019379427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945905,0.0017952635,0.00029113446,0.0003155218,0.0022067644,0.00080096774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071317023,0.00072169723,0.00050609314,0.0017377381,0.026687829,0.013021305,0.0018961944,0.008559334,0.0065217204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105920695,0.00056935544,0.00047790672,0.0014970745,0.04257575,0.00450697,0.004278107,0.011307612,0.0010164469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018358007,0.0000062068184,0.00044145944,0.000035858633,0.000004617089,0.00018890505,0.026843805,0.000085812186,0.0001815307,0.9239888,0.04090758,0.0072970805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020514894,0.00001804548,0.0025189896,0.00031511506,0.000012422649,0.0001632661,0.014607617,0.0003029415,0.00037680255,0.058834042,0.92277837,0.000051837065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84360504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90343916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84360504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07299682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07159058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5296315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967488272","doi":"10.1163/1573035053683209","title":"Rights of Private Property in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and in the Civil Code of Quebec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Political science; Law; Contradiction; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private property; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021656405054679508,"score_gpt":0.2652328119427474,"score_spread":0.2435764068880679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967488272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38525805,0.0023594603,0.0045573525,0.0060684555,0.000113543865,0.00007221528,0.0005818435,0.000052308915,0.6009368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844077,0.00022691338,0.0005190902,0.0001322605,0.000007929888,0.000015196392,0.000069118796,0.000006897034,0.014614787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774545,0.0005573615,0.0000721093,0.00019684494,0.0005601326,0.000868145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969368,0.0007255355,0.00032826624,0.0002874395,0.0014141564,0.00030788622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012899825,0.00016050281,0.00020818222,0.001784045,0.005122329,0.0046158186,0.0006646164,0.0011116496,0.004792276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036245943,0.0001405652,0.00021553063,0.0022800777,0.011028727,0.0019960534,0.0013997529,0.001380621,0.00024018009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019018218,0.000011475728,0.0036274916,0.000021659831,0.000006099539,0.00014754539,0.010920834,0.00061651407,0.00031139053,0.97288775,0.0027851178,0.008645065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040308005,0.00007099668,0.15898024,0.00059267384,0.00006615245,0.00051930617,0.049496055,0.0077817584,0.0012695463,0.17106926,0.6099036,0.00021014827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9382703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9220956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06172973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039704673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024841063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2880789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19685341","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2611","title":"Book Review: Account of Profits, by Peter Devonshire","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.01449183770909468,"score_gpt":0.2923809933180419,"score_spread":0.2778891556089472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19685341","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039025914,0.65065104,0.00078717916,0.032926504,0.04187999,0.000072444695,0.0010415956,0.0003161633,0.27193475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033160353,0.33049777,0.00071989413,0.014703945,0.018096048,0.00009407442,0.001571906,0.0002908649,0.6307095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991811,0.000079728525,0.000051212093,0.00011959792,0.00050244527,0.00006598051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987715,0.00041649854,0.00008966351,0.00007699549,0.0005315755,0.00011376277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051443337,0.0011365879,0.0010993435,0.0025162606,0.0013379367,0.0053202286,0.001287842,0.0018952489,0.09773112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038279914,0.0005838806,0.00045421827,0.0055135735,0.0011115036,0.004296364,0.0014323094,0.0033785738,0.07171104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002766983,0.000004337667,0.000016545044,0.00011459462,0.0000011005521,0.000013888242,0.000025392874,0.000028898472,0.000021472613,0.0014805298,0.975868,0.022422528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012393041,0.0000030781375,0.00012327371,0.00023541848,9.793685e-7,0.00005190124,0.000026290056,0.000015800055,0.00001008988,0.00047167623,0.9990575,0.0000027513313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011269313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018467108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09773112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030222666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038874499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32694316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969631755","doi":"10.7202/1007831ar","title":"L’arbitrage de griefs : un système de justice privé ou public ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Arbitrage; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.02401032820315206,"score_gpt":0.2750596641840929,"score_spread":0.2510493359809408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969631755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054767266,0.009525142,0.12378253,0.17183131,0.0011809563,0.00024546374,0.00015387723,0.00020888959,0.6383046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90001196,0.0025356116,0.020377897,0.0071268156,0.00070339045,0.00023091884,0.000053476815,0.00008923182,0.0688707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823256,0.009137251,0.00061349804,0.0021281114,0.0037734841,0.0020219514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160236,0.0038798738,0.0010366986,0.0013829557,0.0012317661,0.0008663433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014498087,0.0005156993,0.00073684764,0.0018119533,0.009224135,0.017582746,0.00183215,0.0077466434,0.011359802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01563283,0.00044787308,0.00092388847,0.0018293383,0.036125235,0.0118953455,0.008416578,0.008128683,0.0012728337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006938716,0.000007750462,0.00017764173,0.000019787083,0.0000031664072,0.000023797504,0.0013511152,0.00014685685,0.000066425135,0.99237263,0.0015417209,0.004282092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002791676,0.00004116735,0.0009957608,0.00025776358,0.000012763781,0.00012272768,0.0021499225,0.0013698954,0.00029253686,0.8468982,0.14779504,0.00003619712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01739995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01433703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017582746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011826314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017463941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08580637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969955699","doi":"10.5539/res.v6n1p83","title":"Expanding Democracy - Transferring the Crown Prerogative to Parliament","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Realm; Sovereign immunity; Political science; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Democracy; Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.08517694946192185,"score_gpt":0.4004081026270228,"score_spread":0.315231153165101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969955699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07156214,0.0019005318,0.025282213,0.028620025,0.00074626715,0.00010309581,0.000037313694,0.00020160247,0.87154675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196516,0.0006291447,0.003634078,0.005062518,0.0003767709,0.000062933585,0.000020328494,0.00008385317,0.07047871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918051,0.0032056945,0.00022463947,0.0010181995,0.0013675954,0.0023787774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99320203,0.0024731345,0.00056958,0.0013670012,0.0009497008,0.00143852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006346534,0.00032325523,0.0003506563,0.0007434655,0.0067283316,0.0070148734,0.0010318662,0.0027028648,0.008909573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011888459,0.00023916866,0.00047500822,0.0006583121,0.015025181,0.0049906825,0.011996359,0.0052947425,0.002363477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018631446,0.00003403865,0.0005085868,0.000030177918,0.0000036105102,0.00014955454,0.006280361,0.00028140144,0.00043058916,0.9668529,0.0034654043,0.021944743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042528165,0.00010391611,0.0022824248,0.00016056436,0.000010531581,0.00021505321,0.003409173,0.00083001424,0.001228754,0.58081853,0.410863,0.000035427263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058227913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007304126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008909573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005781751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008994923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04194975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970629872","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6296.2001.tb00042.x","title":"REGULATORY NEGOTIATION IN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE REFORM","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Legislature; Regulatory reform; Compensation (psychology); Law reform; Legislative history; State (computer science); Tort; Business; Craft; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.016166601228980403,"score_gpt":0.2970323972593048,"score_spread":0.2808657960303244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970629872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2956528,0.014836818,0.026500924,0.29214022,0.0010457708,0.00050876493,0.000027174707,0.00008130459,0.3692062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785406,0.0013972587,0.0017511483,0.010689019,0.0002719166,0.00014990318,0.000004130868,0.000011610933,0.007184393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9275591,0.052191705,0.001576974,0.0030374166,0.008441514,0.007193272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96734256,0.02573297,0.0027935684,0.00087037735,0.0025123577,0.00074814283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06776934,0.00028669057,0.000622687,0.0017972453,0.012959525,0.013666987,0.0016367082,0.012894859,0.0028905664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05293405,0.0007220491,0.0008399296,0.0014141116,0.02729865,0.006254724,0.0070333187,0.009315464,0.00029928487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020267895,0.000037635506,0.00036260617,0.00004357144,0.000010218422,0.00024367293,0.010662937,0.0008638918,0.00039738248,0.9767833,0.002820458,0.007754008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018283397,0.00022476933,0.003698912,0.0005072545,0.000045446486,0.0002280724,0.02421965,0.0064016175,0.002524642,0.6644437,0.29740882,0.00011430104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013054494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00805091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06776934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017799262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024510577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3584028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970855642","doi":"10.7202/042965ar","title":"La responsabilité civile délictuelle","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012544031755823401,"score_gpt":0.27804312895904154,"score_spread":0.2654990972032181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970855642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03492328,0.0063421507,0.08018377,0.03383846,0.00085008185,0.00015820161,0.00014749121,0.00020460531,0.8433519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7393475,0.005334599,0.024917852,0.0045946217,0.00077613996,0.00026686542,0.00016728512,0.00021676956,0.22437839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904297,0.003399837,0.0003236474,0.0012162813,0.0036565638,0.0009739651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187404,0.0032967266,0.00057387544,0.0015664231,0.0022519736,0.00043701904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008979928,0.0006766043,0.0005178561,0.0019470563,0.004689014,0.009554538,0.0018744494,0.003684993,0.012548725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012134577,0.00047015707,0.000643562,0.001341185,0.019401787,0.0060715224,0.0055165966,0.0065961303,0.0020865153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031132042,0.000006148955,0.00014648626,0.000021173219,0.0000027728574,0.000028589748,0.0010982249,0.0001914132,0.00013678355,0.9892636,0.0011193227,0.007982487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013991082,0.00005397061,0.0014903668,0.00032320045,0.000013917065,0.00023663965,0.0023174747,0.00092974247,0.0013557164,0.39598387,0.5972488,0.00003228205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0216307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016876461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0216307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008838788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01316794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06413019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971069086","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1013","title":"Property Transferred in Breach of Trust","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Conceptual framework; Position (finance); Trust law; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Focus (optics); Relation (database); Express trust; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.0179607744056398,"score_gpt":0.3344342826251214,"score_spread":0.3164735082194816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971069086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31540394,0.007848897,0.15815407,0.061349116,0.0005607866,0.00020503998,0.000092520706,0.00012393597,0.45626172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914442,0.001047199,0.0025428075,0.0010497717,0.00009553701,0.000038752776,0.000011875036,0.000018196106,0.003751847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812587,0.0081941495,0.0011812472,0.0021592344,0.0051647676,0.0020418551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98262906,0.010335885,0.0026708369,0.0022884684,0.0016139997,0.00046163946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012801294,0.0004207581,0.00088083284,0.00290659,0.0072161565,0.01252887,0.0020365345,0.009526539,0.003380832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026943278,0.00047381842,0.0014233277,0.0020859651,0.07557436,0.015673157,0.008944559,0.008469764,0.0002700172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059498025,0.000004086117,0.00021260673,0.000019484405,0.000005724298,0.00017079616,0.0044498364,0.00025497237,0.00008863958,0.99303174,0.0001729496,0.0015831286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090957865,0.00002884854,0.0006460981,0.0001629356,0.000020373582,0.00022943312,0.004689058,0.00096696295,0.00036361898,0.980692,0.012167341,0.000024074705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005717685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033927697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012801294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01009955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050427676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07327765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972550411","doi":"10.7202/1026956ar","title":"Les associations contractuelles en droit québécois et comparé. Analyse critique et perspectives de réforme","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02076838336259991,"score_gpt":0.32804973176334223,"score_spread":0.30728134840074234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972550411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12919296,0.013483169,0.00792638,0.06654943,0.0006600011,0.00014292337,0.00037648005,0.0000769455,0.7815917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82765704,0.003761083,0.0020570578,0.0037611816,0.00011758709,0.00014550218,0.00019554826,0.000032920598,0.16227211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355924,0.0014867903,0.00015004381,0.0008556006,0.0017646089,0.0021836695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957838,0.0007745617,0.00038460415,0.00043115232,0.0017667873,0.00085910095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043660207,0.00041370478,0.00047514454,0.0028482312,0.018645484,0.012597689,0.00223201,0.00376774,0.014312133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007416793,0.00037079057,0.00045069327,0.004913981,0.024612177,0.00504828,0.004885707,0.003961062,0.00075374776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000655298,0.0000073620517,0.0010233932,0.00002240103,0.0000050037534,0.0000776019,0.012269556,0.00024112471,0.00006129181,0.9723923,0.0061799814,0.007713426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002048386,0.000020830517,0.016388869,0.00055394555,0.000031291398,0.00016681085,0.055883393,0.0011164999,0.00024885006,0.110741965,0.8147658,0.00006129738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95245486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96049774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09701734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09701734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11134121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70391333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972694932","doi":"10.7202/042983ar","title":"L'Avant-projet de Loi et la protection des consommateurs","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023086532081036556,"score_gpt":0.296225045160139,"score_spread":0.2731385130791024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972694932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028892305,0.002223969,0.03299734,0.03950788,0.00048316937,0.00028147319,0.00018700067,0.00012705068,0.8952998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3650643,0.0020965706,0.016994301,0.011384878,0.0002248152,0.00048854115,0.0001630913,0.00015018944,0.6034334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98983777,0.0028333534,0.0002109369,0.0009881645,0.0041705347,0.0019591618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904275,0.0024684176,0.00073734357,0.0012220654,0.0035730903,0.001571587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00884325,0.00068682473,0.0005198796,0.001377718,0.0105839325,0.009665057,0.0029181493,0.0059552146,0.0224923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013241519,0.0004890279,0.00076453784,0.001025352,0.012382238,0.0050933096,0.0059978273,0.00879892,0.0027934532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023050525,0.00002768953,0.0010874657,0.0000943043,0.000011834101,0.0001425761,0.0068105846,0.0003596124,0.0005997557,0.9611892,0.009410446,0.020243427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051117288,0.00018765076,0.012667118,0.0008671515,0.000060227092,0.00031544975,0.011133305,0.0016050538,0.0025141204,0.18257934,0.7878879,0.00013163089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28263405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4128291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28263405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016233554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057382114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56197786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973159428","doi":"10.7202/042284ar","title":"La notion d'enrichissement sans cause en droit administratif québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Law; Commercial law; Administrative law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Public law; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Restitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.01147361724020431,"score_gpt":0.28414371244197667,"score_spread":0.2726700952017724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973159428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06106916,0.014148051,0.018993182,0.04525092,0.0006044702,0.00010358292,0.00059350557,0.0001783295,0.85905874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8346123,0.004489896,0.005231174,0.0051877927,0.00035588574,0.00015276065,0.00017179453,0.00007336732,0.14972505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954014,0.0011517134,0.00012369126,0.0006223575,0.0017523222,0.0009486185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827003,0.00043477048,0.00014464498,0.00018047857,0.0007293103,0.00024068732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027931626,0.00059057615,0.00048132867,0.0024887766,0.008185532,0.010808304,0.0012641052,0.003947152,0.0073581734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028701345,0.00044152033,0.00064118265,0.0021483062,0.025127944,0.0034315423,0.0019997929,0.005585365,0.0005867335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004001408,0.000005025816,0.00028549277,0.000009973718,0.0000044028584,0.00006201182,0.0014460062,0.00019805552,0.00008249076,0.9916496,0.0031002986,0.0031526112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000364558,0.000026299227,0.010859473,0.0002350911,0.000028249497,0.0003540104,0.003142459,0.0016119598,0.00030289387,0.16877668,0.8145371,0.00008931378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9187097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90809053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081290305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074478194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03954768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54037964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973233396","doi":"10.7202/042245ar","title":"Les trois phénomènes de la mutation des biens meubles en biens immeubles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Supreme court; Law; Corporation; Order (exchange); Humanities; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.012268165207678195,"score_gpt":0.29966839222632624,"score_spread":0.28740022701864804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973233396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29164484,0.004281052,0.012378027,0.06260169,0.0006113145,0.00008740336,0.00040757252,0.00016717143,0.62782097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89666677,0.00093158404,0.0011477857,0.0060944664,0.00011118213,0.000052089992,0.00007825909,0.00006211692,0.09485579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807525,0.00043367097,0.000058243855,0.00037328308,0.0005123859,0.0005471225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989279,0.00036378377,0.00013481069,0.0001395222,0.00024172703,0.00019222415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018853166,0.00029338317,0.0003721022,0.0011908918,0.01122681,0.0053017666,0.001375988,0.005752507,0.0055956375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005571343,0.00032466793,0.00036866518,0.0010048992,0.03101459,0.005049147,0.003967703,0.005712539,0.0008518435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001709416,0.000013121368,0.0010135092,0.00000629647,0.0000039493493,0.0014403188,0.031311773,0.00008022565,0.0006085505,0.95539564,0.006159503,0.0039500655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045650468,0.00005031345,0.005064649,0.00015898213,0.00002820007,0.0054518436,0.051795848,0.00076387735,0.0017846932,0.4089163,0.5258348,0.00010493336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11434326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09705352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11434326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071386984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004357555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22735542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974703919","doi":"10.7202/037736ar","title":"Amputer la responsabilité contractuelle ? Une tourmente inutile et néfaste","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.00977293843796278,"score_gpt":0.2831949002872897,"score_spread":0.27342196184932693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974703919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02149804,0.04872461,0.007708423,0.58570945,0.004756326,0.000042338,0.0001786167,0.00012938549,0.33125278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47026396,0.028862558,0.004198357,0.09301787,0.0020680514,0.00009419437,0.00014353766,0.0003514033,0.40100008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937689,0.0024762314,0.00011309531,0.0008576267,0.0015185293,0.0012656427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944944,0.0016314837,0.0002614427,0.0005301258,0.0022650715,0.00081747345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00535645,0.00082492654,0.00060810405,0.0011702981,0.016332503,0.012286496,0.0019305915,0.0072675617,0.013521104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071505164,0.0004902969,0.0006035123,0.0014588069,0.028147768,0.010537505,0.0038006161,0.010543687,0.002166605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031753316,0.000014207681,0.00084294856,0.000095889554,0.0000124210055,0.00026768175,0.023616618,0.000119624536,0.0003001896,0.8654115,0.09148965,0.017797438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009708009,0.000013460369,0.0012868484,0.0005198182,0.000011013222,0.00019820427,0.013589618,0.00022849861,0.0003486082,0.046754647,0.9369923,0.000047296886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7222238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7668433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7222238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046200812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05184622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55882406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976456838","doi":"10.7202/1027601ar","title":"Responsabilité civile : les municipalités sont-elles en état de siège ?","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025166574549879077,"score_gpt":0.2946265836838226,"score_spread":0.2694600091339435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976456838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1958513,0.0065254956,0.006150596,0.103190474,0.00089082174,0.00012993545,0.00042048172,0.0001430145,0.6866979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85126114,0.0022471896,0.0008823592,0.003327392,0.00014217135,0.00005667409,0.00018779581,0.00008299357,0.14181225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939394,0.0015966479,0.00013624411,0.00063573534,0.0012372104,0.00245472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971282,0.00036542048,0.00022111811,0.00027017313,0.001030388,0.0009848402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032156894,0.00034845094,0.00048977986,0.0009780308,0.016587468,0.015772335,0.0013913255,0.0024972374,0.01489406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008650727,0.00040324774,0.0003500351,0.0031261186,0.01325537,0.0057603726,0.0061713834,0.0042044553,0.0020741532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035261146,0.000040272644,0.015937006,0.00008912086,0.000023360848,0.00029090434,0.08549236,0.00027562884,0.00047470492,0.8141617,0.035940867,0.047238797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012348132,0.00002601791,0.022184512,0.00023328589,0.000019898442,0.00011443099,0.090744995,0.00019853226,0.00034335014,0.025618695,0.8604614,0.00004253365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57237893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.725247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57237893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024217978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044757057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86027884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976673022","doi":"10.7202/042672ar","title":"La réalisation de garanties du fiduciaire et les syndiqués","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Deed; Debtor; Law; Settlor; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Creditor; Philosophy; Debt; Linguistics","score_opus":0.012092098730171773,"score_gpt":0.2775392191176109,"score_spread":0.2654471203874392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976673022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089961536,0.00795025,0.012408433,0.06933709,0.0020039165,0.000074925854,0.00023704061,0.00025761133,0.8177692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7376339,0.0018072769,0.0024347615,0.0065822313,0.00037682173,0.00006866224,0.000085710424,0.000079587175,0.25093102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916584,0.0017346967,0.00022961378,0.000957379,0.0031997873,0.0022200614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547184,0.001464299,0.00035449828,0.0006135073,0.001433406,0.00066246744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048714587,0.0006458329,0.00048424123,0.001294958,0.011993442,0.012627,0.0017334173,0.007311979,0.01351416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009169631,0.0006705866,0.00066464144,0.0015340808,0.020073703,0.005924241,0.004421144,0.008520097,0.0011374495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013508313,0.000005643538,0.0005937987,0.000019329385,0.0000033157417,0.00028055685,0.0037540796,0.00015116717,0.0001637682,0.9813747,0.008201623,0.005438615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040069033,0.000027631013,0.005706111,0.00024413079,0.000009354964,0.00045057893,0.00545002,0.0007930057,0.0003538156,0.06279128,0.92405874,0.00007528307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.808083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7818067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.808083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0511532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039886966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38609445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976984184","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttu018","title":"Equity in Australian estate litigation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Constructive trust; Estate; Fiduciary; Equity (law); Estoppel; Business; Undue influence; Law; Liability; Estate planning; Legislature; Breach of contract; Law and economics; Duty; Unjust enrichment; Economics; Political science; Damages; Doctrine; Restitution","score_opus":0.054584665973872556,"score_gpt":0.39832812727752687,"score_spread":0.3437434613036543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976984184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10136338,0.035625283,0.012088115,0.12865396,0.0011500516,0.00023335365,0.00006554912,0.000057513986,0.7207627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8947835,0.011342642,0.0041395514,0.016016992,0.000999557,0.00015580509,0.000029159773,0.000026372394,0.07250639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853581,0.0053162104,0.0007255835,0.00096151745,0.006096798,0.0015417648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99139494,0.0047394712,0.00089261273,0.00059319346,0.0015933438,0.000786426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011137069,0.0002831268,0.00042585476,0.0028648435,0.007523964,0.011839819,0.0012467953,0.00622841,0.0054577035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020355258,0.00044169146,0.00054923387,0.0023059247,0.023218604,0.0064402074,0.010337812,0.0048665907,0.0004607618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008044501,0.000029950234,0.0017839525,0.00012763658,0.000005782115,0.0005308168,0.013495408,0.00036239182,0.00020407901,0.93845886,0.006715022,0.038278032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015691361,0.000119938035,0.01792182,0.0011130631,0.000024808038,0.00094546407,0.010321405,0.0018336875,0.00042495702,0.6379955,0.32921317,0.000070473514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052910816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059812635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052910816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017276019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0150409965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1253469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977832111","doi":"10.1002/iir.156","title":"The ‘fresh start’ for individual debtors: social, moral and practical issues","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fresh Start; Debtor; Debt; Position (finance); Start up; Natural (archaeology); Business; Creditor; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; History; Business administration; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.22339467601409949,"score_gpt":0.46337067311235436,"score_spread":0.23997599709825487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977832111","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0161714,0.19196534,0.0068442794,0.48772332,0.004406469,0.00006961253,0.000057012247,0.000044157106,0.29271847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65047383,0.12523052,0.0067165787,0.109824754,0.00784277,0.0002507143,0.000080564285,0.00006921299,0.099511005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831271,0.010409843,0.0005864199,0.0010192636,0.0034490207,0.0014082999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816736,0.012186328,0.0013888265,0.00073610834,0.0029120343,0.0011031068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01949585,0.00036498217,0.0008401113,0.001890727,0.0045879344,0.010903835,0.0023032946,0.011023283,0.0045593977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020561112,0.00027490142,0.0005854585,0.0018105581,0.026429182,0.009823184,0.0038502596,0.009545053,0.00074203854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023185994,0.000009294922,0.00008016167,0.00006905921,0.0000019911324,0.000052682124,0.00096223917,0.00006798635,0.000020165207,0.9644986,0.023810847,0.010424589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013398409,0.00003998058,0.0011381959,0.0017783557,0.000011313396,0.00023971152,0.0041542137,0.00038686238,0.00016158445,0.33531904,0.65672386,0.000033475793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014498217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0153488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01949585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074396217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016988097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10310513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978273071","doi":"10.7202/1026130ar","title":"Tort Law, Risk, and Technological Innovation in England","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Action (physics); Function (biology); Industrial Revolution; Technological change; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.023972221821319688,"score_gpt":0.29210815694112313,"score_spread":0.26813593511980344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978273071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3813174,0.09150977,0.006615791,0.10875741,0.0007324385,0.00009600226,0.00025814777,0.00004820874,0.41066498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95798576,0.008344108,0.0006406198,0.0025283066,0.00029598587,0.000034224217,0.00002256825,0.000010367351,0.030138034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805886,0.0006042011,0.00013899316,0.00019162278,0.0005780825,0.0004281662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561065,0.0031649112,0.00054088136,0.00014838272,0.00031073848,0.00022448305],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017044368,0.00016241243,0.0003906007,0.0011691538,0.003427486,0.005762872,0.00065681274,0.0038997468,0.0041264873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006268183,0.00030699378,0.0002573485,0.0010579999,0.011520024,0.005556374,0.0034246808,0.003452283,0.000298092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001250952,0.00001668683,0.0008453063,0.00004151433,0.0000023913371,0.0004624596,0.005280566,0.0005608501,0.00010237151,0.9869218,0.0014077754,0.004345755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000694892,0.000093240786,0.012826261,0.00059633545,0.000020082558,0.0010129927,0.0072732894,0.002230652,0.0003688364,0.6722471,0.3031434,0.00011824006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13613534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12098902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023635766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063464562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2706859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978819111","doi":"10.4000/chs.1246","title":"Whigs, Tories and Scottish Legal Reform, c.1785-1832","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Crime Histoire et Sociétés","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hatch (Canada); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Law; Political science; Statute; Law reform; Scots law; Politics; Scots; Shadow (psychology); Legal history; Common law; History; Sources of law; Art","score_opus":0.13095142306151608,"score_gpt":0.39122561753829616,"score_spread":0.2602741944767801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978819111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1437591,0.07515105,0.0010432372,0.13205518,0.005069368,0.00014126814,0.0007148815,0.0001182805,0.6419477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75052565,0.009922628,0.00047610403,0.034860913,0.0016020564,0.000067700756,0.00017264136,0.00007075741,0.20230153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971551,0.0005467885,0.00014252003,0.00035759652,0.00080268615,0.0009952922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986702,0.00041750772,0.00019466714,0.0001294914,0.00040764333,0.00018046296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003736824,0.0006250291,0.00052054407,0.0020326676,0.008694445,0.0057815076,0.00084888603,0.005255216,0.007891048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008002775,0.00042390413,0.00048351983,0.002336218,0.017289884,0.0032842925,0.0035741653,0.0043897913,0.000819802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012813736,0.000051718973,0.0009927306,0.00018656504,0.000024712823,0.0010514254,0.030122997,0.00022455546,0.00030821242,0.86664724,0.072553374,0.027708331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009305389,0.00008523695,0.008278749,0.00021673656,0.00002332045,0.0001951994,0.0031673645,0.000071639595,0.0003408139,0.046484027,0.94099456,0.000049256803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31790057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43240973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31790057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021596907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015484366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63210034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979119494","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0024","title":"Office Politics (Again)!","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Order (exchange); Normative; State (computer science); Political science; Commission; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Law; Public good; Public administration; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.020364362019015543,"score_gpt":0.2768114866713353,"score_spread":0.2564471246523198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979119494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044809794,0.009847339,0.0005376275,0.094942965,0.004169846,0.000013574326,0.00025065913,0.00006165831,0.8856954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13917224,0.009828255,0.00033967075,0.024723774,0.004554053,0.00004743685,0.00030443043,0.0001493388,0.82088083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987124,0.00033338476,0.000029464525,0.00017289804,0.0003227451,0.0004291121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922335,0.00017401783,0.00009837391,0.00007597529,0.00015441241,0.00027390846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068428484,0.00025857036,0.00024212846,0.00087160023,0.0049039116,0.009626216,0.0005094405,0.0020226154,0.1199097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023825543,0.00017587097,0.00029057276,0.0019553134,0.0033733295,0.0048610927,0.0033590933,0.004177526,0.029912818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029138791,0.000031504263,0.0007791549,0.000083811305,0.0000031439506,0.00010070496,0.0037817303,0.000038817478,0.00011988162,0.58104146,0.36686438,0.047126263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025045802,0.0000041126827,0.00084150623,0.00007047415,9.0398464e-7,0.000020670906,0.0015496631,0.000008332548,0.000028141321,0.0049487315,0.99252266,0.0000023136488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018097023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021919085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1199097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003914491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033715987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40113795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979206386","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.603","title":"IDEAS, INTERESTS, INSTITUTIONS AND THE HISTORY OF CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY LAW, 1867–1880","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislation; Scholarship; Law; Creditor; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Repeal; State (computer science); Sociology; Economics; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.02171454587795497,"score_gpt":0.24027734574756968,"score_spread":0.21856279986961472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979206386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10316373,0.053418048,0.0020914562,0.052352943,0.0006301599,0.00007899549,0.0008852389,0.00007253162,0.7873069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81092477,0.022568766,0.0014033258,0.0055076755,0.00022919787,0.000044734676,0.00024132262,0.00005527331,0.15902494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973749,0.00023495455,0.00006177404,0.00024584425,0.001022604,0.001059846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978104,0.0005074705,0.00015893814,0.000059040656,0.0011165225,0.00034764578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019606638,0.0005217161,0.00026855888,0.0057098125,0.017780973,0.00822257,0.0011253136,0.0030091442,0.0066473065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053385594,0.00053649675,0.0002870899,0.0058882656,0.032691553,0.0025518446,0.001760582,0.0036055744,0.00048425022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025937965,0.000014621125,0.0022188963,0.00007137959,0.000008994749,0.00026081598,0.040879067,0.0005504272,0.0001344399,0.8924451,0.032849547,0.030540723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010810338,0.000009636026,0.012098931,0.00026997534,0.000014260259,0.00010248095,0.0073149554,0.00020543695,0.00018025532,0.02052797,0.95920604,0.00005912754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71635526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28364474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14489491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83087057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980459580","doi":"10.7202/043056ar","title":"Former corporate managers, fiduciary obligations, and the public policy in favor of competition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Damages; Obligation; Business; Competition (biology); Doctrine; Supreme court; Equity (law); Corporate law; Law and economics; Law; Accounting; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.01572433032665396,"score_gpt":0.2622032981354559,"score_spread":0.24647896780880194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980459580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0626774,0.030753534,0.024858804,0.3457609,0.0017954258,0.00007827095,0.00010167251,0.00007542527,0.53389853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9021517,0.007621249,0.0064147767,0.040042263,0.0022360536,0.00014682491,0.00004854426,0.00004472593,0.04129384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98550874,0.0060657836,0.00047024907,0.0014025675,0.004742527,0.0018101755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930006,0.004651872,0.00065539463,0.0005126239,0.00080131,0.00037819397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014474703,0.00045440602,0.0006380742,0.0015719892,0.007863386,0.010072085,0.001487489,0.010472623,0.002210305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012228701,0.00044535656,0.000624431,0.0012584524,0.059069898,0.007947184,0.0036647916,0.009253392,0.0004921038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001139654,0.0000032567807,0.000039420076,0.000005141144,6.844987e-7,0.000011051159,0.00026212982,0.00003870949,0.00001303463,0.9971679,0.0014542026,0.0010033663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010128315,0.000013242608,0.0003218543,0.00012621256,0.000005189932,0.00003563437,0.0004877457,0.00024966887,0.00012436774,0.9550806,0.04353067,0.00001464585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020292487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020043254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020292487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012090927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015883232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087726176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980917744","doi":"10.7202/042799ar","title":"La cession générale de créances commerciales à titre de garantie comme contrat de « fiducia » en droit québécois, français et anglais","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Payment; Creditor; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Debt; Humanities; Law and economics; Law; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.015363789891329409,"score_gpt":0.29512054892555173,"score_spread":0.2797567590342223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980917744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15763249,0.006889591,0.015225954,0.017424382,0.00033811532,0.00020547883,0.0010637464,0.0003231281,0.80089706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63345784,0.0015270831,0.0038101731,0.0010963125,0.00009028597,0.00006037467,0.00017581572,0.000033753302,0.3597483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985012,0.00031820298,0.000059300153,0.00026435184,0.0005283047,0.00032876316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836355,0.00061820174,0.000210434,0.00020465344,0.00042719833,0.00017600402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001392193,0.00037039386,0.0002200507,0.0012629908,0.0040148497,0.0053701326,0.0007838446,0.0025780494,0.013020038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029737768,0.00032967023,0.0002990818,0.0019054145,0.0061578983,0.0018446854,0.0012004308,0.002074857,0.00097031525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025883539,0.000024050532,0.0035502985,0.00005071619,0.000009699849,0.0002492009,0.0061993636,0.00047632112,0.0010911557,0.9317485,0.020420967,0.036153782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024095809,0.000068611815,0.03193464,0.0001532414,0.000014085462,0.0006093793,0.0029146175,0.001261171,0.0011966951,0.04206786,0.9196832,0.00007229643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66964644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7777994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33035356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01871389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011942291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6645981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981953899","doi":"10.7202/1017518ar","title":"Private Rights to Public Property: The Evolution of Common Property in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Property rights; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Property law; Government (linguistics); Intangible property; Common law; Political science; Common property; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026804891793771348,"score_gpt":0.25307801412567693,"score_spread":0.22627312233190558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981953899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15772024,0.007882176,0.008278948,0.11702442,0.00044093071,0.00011678956,0.0004185667,0.00008560151,0.70803237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524022,0.0025954791,0.0013861326,0.0071107815,0.000075248136,0.000029436582,0.0000822707,0.00003859647,0.036279958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119955,0.000650093,0.00014511113,0.0010307255,0.0036896656,0.003284883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309665,0.0018477759,0.00039737116,0.0004713116,0.0028619731,0.0013247848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031262052,0.00032223796,0.0006032605,0.0022553126,0.030347042,0.012800838,0.0022709374,0.0058052973,0.0075288797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010909282,0.0005839031,0.0006819204,0.0036652354,0.024972348,0.0061713043,0.0054092803,0.008796854,0.00029207874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012030157,0.000009455339,0.0012935292,0.000025121684,0.0000070524643,0.00028654878,0.0049058944,0.0002935383,0.00011746992,0.9797783,0.0059115235,0.0073595745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084483865,0.00004488822,0.025129935,0.00049482664,0.00008904098,0.00042758466,0.016142841,0.0039894897,0.00088339846,0.31759915,0.63487434,0.00024001423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99403906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99544865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21208693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21208693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20910028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9138675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982176569","doi":"10.1093/tandt/7.8.8","title":"Canadian Taxation of Offshore Trusts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.022867585446724657,"score_gpt":0.30267023963433065,"score_spread":0.27980265418760597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982176569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019258896,0.0051621627,0.00081126293,0.02403397,0.0009153647,0.00008752377,0.0042263963,0.00013980803,0.9453647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39214057,0.009193356,0.0010815781,0.003938324,0.00041966,0.00005408746,0.0022729193,0.00012458442,0.5907749],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948095,0.00018907928,0.00012639171,0.0002389744,0.0035159625,0.0011200168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152654,0.0005040909,0.0003675538,0.00050572597,0.0056913653,0.0014046778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015043755,0.00035637032,0.00034696455,0.0030045258,0.005850188,0.0051949862,0.0007272606,0.0016465262,0.033233725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012537338,0.00036417792,0.0004607084,0.0063741016,0.0014271792,0.0017810295,0.0015974324,0.0019329332,0.0027737315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076526274,0.00002379437,0.00620365,0.00015991207,0.000022807764,0.00023105033,0.001004907,0.00082953856,0.0003155558,0.37699005,0.56479496,0.04934735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013677442,0.000011032874,0.012362622,0.0001330309,0.000014956205,0.00010179389,0.00047232426,0.0005018989,0.00017154857,0.0061125457,0.9800709,0.000033732435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9719782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9761194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070928544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070928544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116686195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.514625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982786921","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0016","title":"The Idea of Consideration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Doctrine; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Epistemology; Control (management); Contrast (vision); Law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03285581476177582,"score_gpt":0.2494688006652572,"score_spread":0.21661298590348138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982786921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021628259,0.005958798,0.20835502,0.05445943,0.0013392068,0.00018527439,0.00011966423,0.00015738404,0.70779693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91004074,0.0016903959,0.026650881,0.011243005,0.0011030731,0.00047108522,0.00007115739,0.0001735069,0.04855617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827172,0.007416972,0.00065608224,0.0034499196,0.004392314,0.0013675708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98950034,0.0050565843,0.0009973974,0.0024395876,0.001196174,0.00080986903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012931424,0.00054533716,0.00093635014,0.0018159653,0.007199982,0.009827179,0.0026256996,0.0061233323,0.0065131094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587377,0.0006356085,0.0013060228,0.0018114961,0.06089709,0.014553239,0.009587661,0.009434066,0.0009798935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021063802,0.0000013717448,0.000034550136,0.0000056430863,0.0000012476843,0.000005733697,0.0003602647,0.000019782752,0.000018992258,0.99826765,0.0003287546,0.0009538762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006776869,0.000017241427,0.000071711074,0.00005153867,0.0000073025267,0.0000530928,0.00031190325,0.00019629403,0.00008781475,0.949112,0.050074853,0.000009556854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048946454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038224729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012931424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065438203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00845022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0683887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983153865","doi":"10.1017/s0008197300250101","title":"<scp>FOR LOVE OR MONEY? DEPENDENT CARERS AND FAMILY PROVISION</scp>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Settlement (finance); Daughter; Damages; Entitlement (fair division); Law; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Estate planning; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Payment; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; History","score_opus":0.025309965010872532,"score_gpt":0.2971921425248232,"score_spread":0.27188217751395066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983153865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027468072,0.0024543835,0.0003272689,0.14098743,0.0075824023,0.00014952943,0.0010824808,0.00036372003,0.8443059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011568394,0.0011384329,0.00029024016,0.107642,0.0018166826,0.00012453584,0.00048195015,0.00017429137,0.87676346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992144,0.000101530386,0.00004111708,0.00008373609,0.00027839406,0.00028086075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982957,0.00042818513,0.00007435575,0.00013094745,0.000545936,0.0005248769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000803768,0.00036102327,0.00028935252,0.00046469207,0.0049650664,0.0034362809,0.0012600434,0.008109809,0.17931032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004199182,0.0003365281,0.00036479277,0.00042564434,0.0010557219,0.0018364087,0.0025536427,0.0044833464,0.057355702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005637684,0.000010598417,0.00015672957,0.000018087205,6.2588384e-7,0.00018129386,0.00016532594,0.000009844033,0.00006536302,0.0046536806,0.9874259,0.007306906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044990334,0.0000076456,0.0010574778,0.00007256614,0.0000010681048,0.00015272167,0.00043462048,0.000022347778,0.000054328437,0.00058557716,0.9976011,0.000005958342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06935254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20730765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17931032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024157567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037876484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5998528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984276272","doi":"10.7202/050078ar","title":"Interest Arbitration in Ontario Hospitals: Result of an Attitude Survey of Union and Management Officials","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law","score_opus":0.0755882254909491,"score_gpt":0.32661575642287366,"score_spread":0.25102753093192454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984276272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99698764,0.00006223306,0.00003680087,0.00063905364,0.0000059567797,0.00002395706,0.000034069468,0.0000011290033,0.0022091959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844533,0.00011736912,0.000046833862,0.0002449897,0.0000072098414,0.000015992086,0.000030699517,0.000001710302,0.0010899153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478346,0.0014759041,0.00027858122,0.00017547292,0.0019055109,0.0013811132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842875,0.003200045,0.0059315045,0.00027919846,0.003675697,0.0026261343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00397603,0.00014623301,0.00019931763,0.0007197624,0.0026502865,0.0016563067,0.0003124749,0.00052476965,0.0018484516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013843611,0.00025861003,0.00022107169,0.001334455,0.0018032633,0.0005188606,0.0010426899,0.00091589516,0.00022438192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016803955,0.00022556627,0.88190025,0.000058350048,0.000018912458,0.00024328107,0.103346765,0.00004892399,0.0008913899,0.0002450239,0.0016470493,0.0112063885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001354956,0.00014942697,0.91316235,0.000025873493,0.000008315098,0.000051918487,0.082640134,0.000095495,0.00013152971,0.000028055938,0.0036782597,0.000015081215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61837345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74889654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98834634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0116536375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011905701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.767748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985312042","doi":"10.3138/utlj.041813","title":"REFLECTIONS ON THE STATE AS FIDUCIARY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Statutory interpretation; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.0305442363649234,"score_gpt":0.30412674739813045,"score_spread":0.2735825110332071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985312042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011456378,0.09613701,0.015625611,0.39317724,0.003347873,0.0000121698695,0.000058488953,0.00004584192,0.48013943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7749229,0.06320998,0.004271644,0.069592245,0.0051609003,0.00006928123,0.00006036313,0.00011398146,0.08259879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633515,0.0016982416,0.00008764495,0.00040337446,0.0010480273,0.00042753844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972007,0.0021208758,0.00011846928,0.0001657013,0.0002701204,0.00012410691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004847776,0.00027788043,0.00052328967,0.00079009816,0.0037187678,0.007599271,0.0010401336,0.00656782,0.004165799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005292373,0.0002977012,0.0004307289,0.0011224353,0.034587443,0.011052906,0.0035266997,0.010435312,0.00082798017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.213717e-7,6.94825e-7,0.0000071098525,0.0000085299525,3.786257e-7,0.0000069722823,0.000325948,0.000031349984,0.000006114417,0.99613345,0.0026233715,0.00085535314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000277973,0.0000052695245,0.00007896523,0.00016663808,0.0000017191446,0.000044979948,0.0007322366,0.00014495547,0.000053118187,0.79010975,0.20865351,0.000006025067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011652648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010870299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011652648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008242991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005346706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05980742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985338100","doi":"10.1111/1467-6478.00238","title":"Woe Unto You, Judges: or How Reading Frankfurter and Greene, <i>The Labor Injunction,</i> Ruined Me as a Labour Lawyer and Made Me as an Academic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03024942609389151,"score_gpt":0.3070784440875099,"score_spread":0.27682901799361836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985338100","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005136104,0.04299924,0.003125311,0.5844383,0.011514022,0.000017778859,0.000106795,0.00008955068,0.35257292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15951067,0.022319337,0.0024090714,0.1579633,0.0036484033,0.000039427257,0.00012680184,0.00033920698,0.65364385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881065,0.0003886502,0.000031330565,0.00017992275,0.0003931066,0.00019635369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984394,0.00062272133,0.00014501541,0.000117632655,0.0004563215,0.00021902521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011807336,0.00033753845,0.00035570405,0.0007723432,0.0058446215,0.009010443,0.0006241058,0.0034758502,0.019153276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011006966,0.00032300723,0.00020567316,0.0009168643,0.008340269,0.012695729,0.0016298154,0.0055880966,0.006075066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009903943,0.00000932724,0.00037380215,0.00004841528,0.000004880127,0.00007747291,0.0055560777,0.0000260115,0.00019680843,0.21919271,0.7435734,0.03093117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040738614,0.000008731279,0.0006591677,0.0003435168,0.0000052509795,0.00010578191,0.008127767,0.000039559643,0.00019791276,0.06475205,0.9257392,0.00001692391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02302877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085004166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02302877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028746882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033287671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06407404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987155948","doi":"10.7202/1000626ar","title":"Some Australian Reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Political science; Statute; Common law; Misconduct; Liability","score_opus":0.18454920957132986,"score_gpt":0.3810247983716258,"score_spread":0.19647558880029592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987155948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027543537,0.015893657,0.0011724925,0.669997,0.0021643578,0.000053710835,0.000091164846,0.000052833268,0.2830313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36687544,0.012533406,0.0016131115,0.45056382,0.0024317012,0.000088857545,0.000041961728,0.00010630252,0.16574535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99171317,0.002958652,0.00028974874,0.0009850155,0.0023452588,0.0017081088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951108,0.0027772589,0.00030650978,0.00021648886,0.0010157429,0.00057305745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008155928,0.0005317869,0.0004895866,0.0015504091,0.019041024,0.008734627,0.0028891703,0.016003476,0.006217361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144233685,0.000709985,0.001046621,0.0019449772,0.015814962,0.006802829,0.0048230295,0.024182083,0.0008311222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004127845,0.00005626298,0.0010426939,0.00016740987,0.0000135053815,0.0014133988,0.052618146,0.0001932485,0.00069075415,0.76231927,0.16174027,0.019703707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014780871,0.00007531766,0.0063515264,0.00049021404,0.000025333544,0.0004759848,0.014151088,0.0003269428,0.0005419258,0.06375252,0.9136736,0.00012070061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47066152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50710684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47066152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025808437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013792472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93584394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988408899","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-1130.2005.00030.x","title":"A Charge We Have to Keep. A Road Map to Personal and Economic Freedom for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities in the 21st Century","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual freedom; Hippocratic Oath; Citation; Library science; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.047716136038599456,"score_gpt":0.3604403713578335,"score_spread":0.31272423531923405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988408899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032352336,0.0034469196,0.000489989,0.9768113,0.007557918,0.000010090729,0.000029810437,0.000029442854,0.011301028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049881503,0.016050074,0.00524268,0.8320793,0.012341144,0.0001535404,0.00018085046,0.0001400367,0.083930895],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98985016,0.0030134614,0.0005556562,0.00072462595,0.0034084197,0.0024477069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681451,0.007966136,0.001497855,0.0012732635,0.007287487,0.013830288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011191548,0.00083530875,0.0015729617,0.0016550125,0.021928119,0.023839189,0.00214588,0.04389045,0.03662291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034035195,0.0006435838,0.001374885,0.0012679404,0.023832666,0.03976934,0.017645843,0.05878296,0.00942465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021072368,0.000098836135,0.00038035074,0.00015435756,0.000013307691,0.00017148934,0.002563479,0.0000943802,0.000115821684,0.26808646,0.6996793,0.028621124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023073231,0.000035293673,0.0005421759,0.00074678275,0.000012739526,0.00019296716,0.009041572,0.00008299208,0.00007221399,0.1484667,0.8407223,0.000061064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026012398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029467944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04389045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062476564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05263617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12251586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988471215","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v2n4p72","title":"Legal Regulation of Administrative Monopoly As Viewed from Chinese Antimonopoly Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Administrative law; Law; Harm; Agency (philosophy); Public law; Business; Economic Justice; Political science; Enforcement; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Market economy","score_opus":0.02609180754453805,"score_gpt":0.3559440998989172,"score_spread":0.32985229235437913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988471215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07814931,0.0032955313,0.043135446,0.02365172,0.00053141493,0.00030518108,0.00025532025,0.00015646248,0.85051954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92869246,0.0021209046,0.010878564,0.0071231667,0.0005610097,0.00043788506,0.00009362966,0.00003204734,0.05006029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971872,0.0004814823,0.00017567562,0.0005164362,0.0012670243,0.00037213165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998941,0.0003806477,0.00013095538,0.00012670728,0.0003441339,0.000076507495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023440288,0.00036205107,0.00028928273,0.0014932817,0.0034202165,0.0045937435,0.0008293533,0.0021275147,0.0038524696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023671484,0.00037617428,0.0005333356,0.0011241687,0.0100826835,0.0027205416,0.0016927851,0.003502706,0.00047109602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004696717,0.00000649364,0.00026583823,0.000028198048,0.0000027258734,0.00008987133,0.00048407636,0.00026101188,0.00026953212,0.9935906,0.0019252475,0.0030716832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068604,0.00006211951,0.0064006154,0.00025012923,0.00006331644,0.0003581921,0.0005914455,0.007738171,0.0017046232,0.8387475,0.14392942,0.00008585967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030719325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022363933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030719325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00700114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011892122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06108105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988984160","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1123","title":"THE LAW AND POLITICS OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Commonwealth; Politics; Political science; Mainstream; Realism; Private law; Legal realism; Comparative law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01074838589350766,"score_gpt":0.2397695653175655,"score_spread":0.22902117942405784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988984160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03728876,0.0035586737,0.006593975,0.028083203,0.00023021564,0.000014081801,0.000026446118,0.000044886896,0.9241597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588222,0.0006985654,0.00076064677,0.0032348072,0.00016655053,0.00002709831,0.000014098697,0.000035537403,0.03624047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962774,0.0018186916,0.00006803512,0.0005560196,0.0006219439,0.00065781956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869424,0.0006108089,0.0001174359,0.00030335085,0.00015714165,0.000117076495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028426165,0.0001996383,0.00032848906,0.0009480168,0.0077305543,0.009366308,0.00072380557,0.0039040998,0.0055156522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037173333,0.0002265808,0.0002933166,0.0007063234,0.036215127,0.0057333144,0.0044960612,0.0046595884,0.0006064328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001423732,0.0000016818448,0.00003497574,0.0000019080733,4.0899204e-7,0.0000063921557,0.00039186308,0.000025231127,0.000013549602,0.9984523,0.00050758343,0.00056260795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067363476,0.000005165799,0.00028340032,0.000045825687,0.0000036697052,0.000029502115,0.00096893194,0.00024413611,0.00012524909,0.9380324,0.060249705,0.000005283765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009062361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009288588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009366308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073896684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036364947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053616047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989241908","doi":"10.7202/1026983ar","title":"Reopening the Langelier—Mignault Debate on Unauthorized Transactions Involving a Minor's Property","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Section (typography); Authorization; Property (philosophy); Law; Major and minor; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer security; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.025716217945193597,"score_gpt":0.2685590023286666,"score_spread":0.24284278438347298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989241908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057312496,0.0196674,0.0059365295,0.56072974,0.002396412,0.00001912076,0.00007910527,0.00007113275,0.3537881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83878356,0.0038739059,0.0020153823,0.089257896,0.0023082343,0.000043383327,0.000021244385,0.000077972785,0.0636185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940094,0.0028288236,0.00015175255,0.0008728153,0.0014070111,0.00073017884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940216,0.004431644,0.0002652074,0.00037471426,0.0006195322,0.00028738996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007928893,0.0003800727,0.000545327,0.00091556145,0.007184238,0.011979076,0.0020670127,0.015930153,0.0025682931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01287556,0.00032537006,0.000605946,0.0007284998,0.024308885,0.0067846347,0.0031517881,0.010807774,0.00049176894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010723499,0.000005104411,0.00011175134,0.000010268418,0.0000016344484,0.00007642067,0.003011982,0.000043388445,0.000058460915,0.9833257,0.010627743,0.0027167776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027631679,0.000041710377,0.0013442072,0.00046724232,0.000014128826,0.00031692407,0.0050087604,0.0006449937,0.0005070071,0.35989583,0.63167816,0.000053323613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045202408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05194322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045202408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011541279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070628324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08987862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989959054","doi":"10.7202/1019050ar","title":"Les défis du droit suisse de l’insolvabilité face au trust : séparation des patrimoines, publicité et poursuite pour dettes","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.03280326000870325,"score_gpt":0.29971933485262314,"score_spread":0.2669160748439199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989959054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45121163,0.003745469,0.03511831,0.068748586,0.0007429128,0.00021587021,0.000116573865,0.00009480453,0.44000587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974795,0.0005661382,0.0018527866,0.002029957,0.000098081786,0.00006882033,0.00002482906,0.00002890135,0.020535393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841936,0.0051306393,0.0009642249,0.0015522279,0.0046472233,0.0035121292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984355,0.0066473642,0.0030077924,0.0015905994,0.0028114198,0.0015878713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009775421,0.0004725897,0.00057846156,0.0013035751,0.008099497,0.012798065,0.001672677,0.006315585,0.0086993035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025680287,0.0004628173,0.0006738802,0.0011643198,0.024793005,0.010395562,0.009006761,0.008438618,0.0009411662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000827883,0.00003653521,0.006322018,0.000116746225,0.000020688154,0.00056904746,0.033337846,0.00053326157,0.00072026055,0.93562895,0.0030958708,0.01953598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103449725,0.00045612612,0.041368086,0.0017007792,0.000117578595,0.0017135695,0.15279183,0.003012473,0.0032588432,0.504446,0.2907498,0.00028132513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031113243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038592994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031113243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017644133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01218109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12801778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990585958","doi":"10.1108/eb025956","title":"A Bit of an Ending: The <i>Bre‐X</i> Litigation, Class Actions and the Liability of Professionals","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Context (archaeology); Class action; Law; Legislation; Law and economics; Business; Individualism; Political science; Economics; Finance; Corporate governance; History","score_opus":0.027606676943310145,"score_gpt":0.3459518799927251,"score_spread":0.31834520304941494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990585958","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06950516,0.008732915,0.0039657988,0.5481212,0.0010795976,0.000026584185,0.00008465001,0.00003272681,0.36845133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8305735,0.0032402098,0.0015376126,0.07487141,0.0007277194,0.00003561767,0.000034590907,0.000038194696,0.08894112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979691,0.00048211866,0.000047867867,0.00015875934,0.0006750638,0.00066711166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984964,0.0005841323,0.00017274363,0.00010755827,0.00030051757,0.0003386646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017595266,0.00019613326,0.00024661818,0.00083976676,0.01443993,0.010643148,0.00096373365,0.008143617,0.0042546573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035594013,0.00019041587,0.00031377136,0.0007835989,0.039630987,0.005277385,0.003142507,0.0073990626,0.00036632002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112890275,0.00001071378,0.0012166116,0.000017301581,0.000002806253,0.00023014344,0.0139967855,0.00007828877,0.00016518049,0.94630843,0.03234458,0.005617829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022793218,0.000041239033,0.0074506267,0.00044425746,0.000018314027,0.0004022379,0.04718722,0.00047013664,0.00051067537,0.46375048,0.47963297,0.00006915592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3807019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5520561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3807019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018308233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012703837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75697196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990591862","doi":"10.7202/1027181ar","title":"La fiducie : outil efficace de protection contre les créanciers dans un contexte d’insolvabilité ?","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015907792313176596,"score_gpt":0.25265346373665015,"score_spread":0.23674567142347355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990591862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075181186,0.0063214153,0.011314218,0.06893214,0.000514209,0.00006675617,0.00009862357,0.000056827037,0.83751464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88524413,0.0018649562,0.0016708848,0.006929906,0.00018192388,0.00005891858,0.000033356846,0.00005802228,0.10395785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387026,0.00197906,0.00011312486,0.0007629447,0.0014989775,0.0017756072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968046,0.00085143663,0.00030079766,0.0004824973,0.001138969,0.00042180577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005412054,0.0006176788,0.0006501944,0.0013226148,0.012967346,0.011193331,0.0021032067,0.006226985,0.011142926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008169491,0.00033800217,0.0004994755,0.0009820234,0.036692623,0.0054155327,0.0049976064,0.0065693357,0.0009669044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012104826,0.0000051553807,0.00058424973,0.000025259345,0.000007492398,0.000091166134,0.009976197,0.00014334638,0.000097210075,0.980674,0.0033112378,0.0050726384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004435047,0.00007338759,0.007851925,0.0008756222,0.00006491737,0.00034640182,0.028498316,0.0012892268,0.0010267851,0.348747,0.6110801,0.00010206762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4927849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.603689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4927849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033489488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03057754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9798331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992484021","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2637","title":"The fault of trespass","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Duty; Tort; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Liability; Law; Contributory negligence; Normative; Possession (linguistics); Strict liability; Business; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009435617330577219,"score_gpt":0.24321257248906838,"score_spread":0.23377695515849117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992484021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15592273,0.0058688144,0.06246932,0.13080855,0.0009091561,0.00007493353,0.00016057555,0.00020163982,0.6435842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97584957,0.00052322325,0.0013966277,0.004134734,0.00021618824,0.000026571948,0.000019203082,0.000029297295,0.017804626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99086446,0.0028044807,0.00048584933,0.0017490245,0.0028104787,0.0012857752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197185,0.002898557,0.0009455963,0.0020575458,0.0014914318,0.0006351383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075020264,0.00036394814,0.0006470753,0.0007890068,0.006635981,0.00734632,0.0012544774,0.006844034,0.0039788196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018558867,0.00037303133,0.00044254403,0.00050909125,0.05341307,0.010916307,0.0057517188,0.006559282,0.0009004051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000920618,0.000003631708,0.0004264038,0.000009585099,0.0000035992423,0.00011303658,0.0026032822,0.00011694807,0.00006495126,0.9917705,0.002284932,0.0025939122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017581862,0.000048561284,0.0012383228,0.00015032863,0.0000168479,0.0006157235,0.003121875,0.0009799827,0.0004123686,0.91377074,0.07959741,0.000030361993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012717007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007321281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012717007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056719733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058122533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041153252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993245295","doi":"10.7202/042510ar","title":"Formality or Informality. A Case-Study of British National Insurance Local Tribunal Procedure and Practice","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Formality; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.02291046701174878,"score_gpt":0.31397405229976694,"score_spread":0.2910635852880182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993245295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595485,0.0018017184,0.0010604187,0.0025601112,0.000053647796,0.00016174452,0.000046334833,0.000010883952,0.034756616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938007,0.00059372885,0.00029134192,0.00017924732,0.00001241672,0.00007027497,0.00002007198,0.0000057563484,0.005026516],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880827,0.007376415,0.00044119547,0.00050933217,0.001269824,0.0023203804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855165,0.0077957422,0.0029114601,0.00087373133,0.0009934993,0.0019089899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006641349,0.00023005049,0.0003994314,0.0017922225,0.008764709,0.004869268,0.0010775169,0.0019189571,0.008311863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025421552,0.00038579298,0.00032015052,0.0025461186,0.009247042,0.0024605866,0.0059794937,0.001792195,0.00055875815],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001857537,0.0009630717,0.12716709,0.0007117025,0.000039755643,0.016152779,0.6638956,0.0009503232,0.0005856067,0.08725073,0.0047051613,0.097392336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035291072,0.0004036989,0.12818661,0.0008968902,0.000025381732,0.005080124,0.8117308,0.00082554773,0.00016861511,0.00609197,0.046491273,0.00006379166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1030345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22832581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1030345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011313909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083169425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20486951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993448166","doi":"10.1111/1467-9299.00256","title":"The Lost Legitimacy: Property, Business Power and the Constitution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian National University; Leverhulme Trust; Manchester Metropolitan University","keywords":"Legitimacy; Competition (biology); Constitution; Politics; Accountability; Quarter (Canadian coin); Power (physics); Democracy; Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Political economy; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03152106397148123,"score_gpt":0.3043101881480836,"score_spread":0.27278912417660234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993448166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069065854,0.018425068,0.011926466,0.20142597,0.0015076041,0.000039458755,0.000087220906,0.00007153649,0.6974507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96113056,0.0036927932,0.0011787397,0.0051403255,0.0010264046,0.000054004682,0.00003782711,0.000054338936,0.027685042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357283,0.002919206,0.00017077128,0.00064783695,0.0015176956,0.0011716859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913625,0.005893339,0.000589376,0.0009045963,0.00072205183,0.00052810594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071676834,0.00030174223,0.0005323977,0.0021609191,0.009849359,0.017214818,0.0011796751,0.005498732,0.0057595014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017607853,0.00034216064,0.0003620992,0.0021642179,0.088054605,0.016056629,0.007470264,0.007903473,0.0007975309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040495256,0.000003969709,0.0000730795,0.0000055417213,0.0000010053684,0.000034669767,0.0010224096,0.000042801894,0.000016280494,0.9954797,0.0014653247,0.0018511662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000985261,0.0000060392867,0.00017252329,0.00005819655,0.0000016946655,0.000037016645,0.0008352103,0.00011534208,0.000044692646,0.9648027,0.033910424,0.000006256784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008560504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007507272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017214818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007330436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071092304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053186238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994381960","doi":"10.7202/042560ar","title":"La prise de possession par le fiduciaire en vertu d'un acte de fiducie","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deed; Possession (linguistics); Corporation; Law; Business; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.011437268889691122,"score_gpt":0.26904498816788,"score_spread":0.2576077192781889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994381960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034932632,0.0137083735,0.015240543,0.050701898,0.0012163027,0.00007888815,0.00017697539,0.00010665772,0.88383764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.821671,0.004473,0.007214707,0.00880129,0.00048260458,0.0000831864,0.000053022122,0.000047403428,0.15717372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937954,0.0019442366,0.000194309,0.00053570344,0.00204644,0.0014839065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600405,0.0018446618,0.000340518,0.00039664097,0.0011312597,0.0002828074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005898384,0.00051263644,0.0006884063,0.0008831624,0.008899313,0.009779779,0.0011911017,0.005072983,0.0040274826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082871765,0.00045436248,0.00048751105,0.0010320841,0.027659483,0.0037327786,0.0026646077,0.0070897657,0.0008614107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010065712,0.0000055392234,0.00033292014,0.000022496137,0.0000034135344,0.00012066254,0.0057837325,0.00009266078,0.00016160589,0.9788406,0.006837162,0.0077891736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032020234,0.0000501454,0.004024876,0.0004796247,0.00002384826,0.00061513274,0.005315771,0.0006322843,0.00087768043,0.18362175,0.80423063,0.00009627939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6808645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7145055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6808645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025899682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034343828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6420299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995581034","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2001.tb00182.x","title":"Is breach of confidence a fiduciary wrong? Preserving the reach of judge-made law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Doctrine; Conflation; Hacker; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Computer security; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09780596430543234,"score_gpt":0.39822027612726757,"score_spread":0.3004143118218352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995581034","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06842713,0.0070424704,0.019782813,0.49449095,0.0009052448,0.000050372182,0.0001062631,0.000060628307,0.40913403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661244,0.0016924514,0.0015649878,0.020773957,0.0003296108,0.00003832948,0.000017434264,0.000033062563,0.00942572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697893,0.011832244,0.0014163252,0.0026422776,0.0088949585,0.0054248064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93374914,0.042647235,0.0063457307,0.0067160237,0.0069605075,0.003581254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026904138,0.000306449,0.0011623928,0.002349651,0.009622549,0.020908939,0.0025441211,0.019144656,0.0049812156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10334908,0.00052941137,0.0007073878,0.0021846895,0.08782954,0.024524262,0.00990119,0.014511965,0.0012473922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009170175,0.000015504136,0.0008068443,0.000024874402,0.000007038236,0.00011182625,0.006029652,0.00008452027,0.00007226886,0.9840571,0.003687547,0.0050936216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012090569,0.00003262661,0.0014025774,0.00034188252,0.000009877092,0.00022381885,0.011520049,0.00028161233,0.00024668584,0.937438,0.048455365,0.000035384794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01805996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012563216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026904138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007667333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01583505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1422844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997650404","doi":"10.7202/042542ar","title":"La recevabilité de l'action d'intérêt public","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public interest; Judicial review; Action (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.024763611205764677,"score_gpt":0.3053340460047174,"score_spread":0.2805704347989527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997650404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006256208,0.002317051,0.018205853,0.019209603,0.00052062765,0.000061474246,0.000085466556,0.00015140159,0.9531922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5432303,0.0022514816,0.0072829695,0.007463257,0.00096792687,0.00026483674,0.00008325419,0.00009688475,0.43835905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885705,0.0032922237,0.00028987695,0.0015718435,0.004405663,0.0018698539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993272,0.0028052265,0.0007439791,0.0014314038,0.001405005,0.00034246934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009357861,0.00085325545,0.0005943176,0.001336546,0.006064269,0.013396228,0.002243568,0.0076927566,0.01592046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009724388,0.0006081788,0.0008178701,0.0009195488,0.024577098,0.007057126,0.0046355296,0.0088505335,0.004928304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045113497,0.00000754901,0.00009545578,0.000026254473,0.0000032470243,0.000026600788,0.0013755278,0.000084693515,0.0001600872,0.9886363,0.0038913495,0.0056883483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003940953,0.00006231585,0.0016414877,0.0003574954,0.000029017447,0.00020076074,0.002547672,0.00086008705,0.0017860491,0.2631279,0.72929555,0.000052296647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094379574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09951201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094379574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016014488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017933479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18766046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997740180","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0006","title":"Can the Law Do Without the Reasonable Person?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Honor; Causation; Jurisprudence; Philosophy of law; Common law; Positivism; Sociology; Comparative law; Adjudication; Criminal law; Reasonable person; Political science; Law and economics; Liability","score_opus":0.01632376486803916,"score_gpt":0.24679325122369217,"score_spread":0.230469486355653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997740180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016437463,0.045899794,0.0035137723,0.5647494,0.0065586832,0.000041669813,0.00012905338,0.000082597784,0.37738135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42135853,0.067790665,0.0043101413,0.19641586,0.013651787,0.00019005168,0.00029509433,0.00022822987,0.29575968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429697,0.002399278,0.00020220496,0.0008206345,0.0016579912,0.0006229358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505085,0.0028279081,0.00026832183,0.0002767849,0.0010013923,0.0005747504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048005087,0.0004011643,0.00060187606,0.0011257757,0.005889622,0.007820598,0.0013613428,0.005679255,0.015837332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014287371,0.00037062305,0.0002819443,0.0011416744,0.021311397,0.009847182,0.0025163575,0.008873523,0.0039826976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009804197,0.0000129745995,0.00015544155,0.00006743833,0.0000025035597,0.0000552278,0.0011047357,0.000081621394,0.000028548595,0.7774997,0.20795135,0.01303068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004759367,0.000008902597,0.0003503158,0.0003559387,0.0000034070736,0.00007011924,0.0015404676,0.0001554431,0.000044434903,0.36240354,0.6350462,0.000016513844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03740818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027076136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03740818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00925515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100771645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074380875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997907591","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1846083","title":"The Underlying Value of MacCormick’s Post-Positivism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Positivism; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Epistemology; Statistics","score_opus":0.03441320699679666,"score_gpt":0.30636439767105866,"score_spread":0.271951190674262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997907591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050100524,0.0032715648,0.08836254,0.15070364,0.0026194265,0.00011870917,0.00044208352,0.000257532,0.704124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566521,0.00072155526,0.010637695,0.0075637284,0.0020091957,0.00019052021,0.00006575279,0.0001087375,0.02205078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958442,0.0013984331,0.00019482436,0.0011098298,0.0010469586,0.0004057709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98626477,0.007881144,0.0007797737,0.002636318,0.0019412815,0.0004967389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006777033,0.0005347145,0.00093652506,0.002496002,0.0044711763,0.0051892824,0.0024151213,0.0049435976,0.012840155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019066116,0.00047542315,0.000653523,0.0014412729,0.04275748,0.012078978,0.004243197,0.007826234,0.0013801713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008136075,0.0000040295777,0.000040157614,0.000011078502,0.0000031486645,0.0000139550775,0.00031221038,0.000039499562,0.00001753413,0.99746966,0.0011672243,0.00091345847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008506597,0.000002548462,0.000062154,0.000010384679,0.0000020121502,0.000015711263,0.000058778638,0.00015744282,0.000037935435,0.9954686,0.0041715014,0.0000045259653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026025786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002531274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012840155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042201583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023888815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042954564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998498338","doi":"10.1017/s0268416007006492","title":"Sir John Baker, <i>The Oxford history of the laws of England, Volume VI: 1483–1558</i> . (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.) Pages cl+964. £125.00. Sir JohnBaker, The Oxford history of the laws of England, Volume VI: 1483–1558. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.) Pages cl+964. £125.00.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Continuity and Change","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); History; Media studies; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.028515974193738608,"score_gpt":0.22160788306594223,"score_spread":0.19309190887220362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998498338","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026817978,0.81580526,0.00034064378,0.12057824,0.014817353,0.000021940748,0.00030739576,0.00006103557,0.047799945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009961299,0.54722846,0.0010426004,0.050734147,0.014722238,0.00005616043,0.0005404341,0.00019198506,0.37552273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986118,0.00038724308,0.00010323931,0.00014740686,0.0006225492,0.0001277502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828136,0.0006860252,0.00024675572,0.000074630596,0.00039968238,0.00031142795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015022592,0.0009556914,0.0007421177,0.002123925,0.001437071,0.0033636987,0.0012748344,0.003711385,0.0601738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044519836,0.000606734,0.00039959632,0.0027193385,0.0024505067,0.0065180054,0.0019482151,0.0044938936,0.024978425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001326869,0.0000030662625,0.000059035963,0.0001712085,0.0000031991606,0.000028514294,0.00024249517,0.000008319067,0.0000248424,0.0027618348,0.97903615,0.017647976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033799145,0.0000041308035,0.00039859684,0.0005298956,0.0000028890179,0.00011966022,0.00035437924,0.000007778316,0.000029573866,0.002105799,0.9964386,0.0000052424425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017991316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048424903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0601738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026503017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028763122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2013014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998545607","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.2.130.36494","title":"Re-Examining Public Policy—A Case for Conditional Fees in Singapore?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Law; Public administration; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.14089845902713205,"score_gpt":0.4197903388280506,"score_spread":0.27889187980091856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998545607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04246542,0.057490923,0.0026684261,0.77135396,0.0018646871,0.000057456295,0.0004165684,0.000044187025,0.12363828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77039015,0.046742763,0.002163308,0.14709334,0.0016288692,0.00011728339,0.00022665123,0.000049142578,0.031588446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905566,0.005167593,0.00066158216,0.0006319366,0.0019845876,0.0009976397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98056626,0.010581367,0.001858582,0.001207373,0.004727814,0.0010585589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017723028,0.00027775276,0.00070059096,0.0020385126,0.0030399212,0.0095537435,0.0012734102,0.008504847,0.004471493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028160477,0.00024232385,0.0008475452,0.0034773946,0.007922692,0.011427171,0.003906764,0.006750973,0.0006906843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003672352,0.00002776577,0.002147035,0.00041644427,0.000044243487,0.0004721943,0.0029440762,0.00054370594,0.00017247304,0.9066323,0.056228172,0.030334886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005217289,0.000068896006,0.010812723,0.001880745,0.000107545355,0.00028991507,0.006451798,0.0013190235,0.0006591037,0.34093487,0.63734144,0.00008173633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089766406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10954376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089766406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01285045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02923984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17848784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999169995","doi":"10.1163/15718158-14010298","title":"Native Title Litigation In Australia: Does The Judiciary Deliver On The Principal Objectives Defined By Mabo?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Law; High Court; Common law; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.028384733331232877,"score_gpt":0.30231283325095754,"score_spread":0.27392809991972467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999169995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38190883,0.027855825,0.0075401794,0.2207894,0.0023507264,0.00010139131,0.000036019177,0.000045978726,0.35937154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9374388,0.005415553,0.0016479908,0.02481051,0.00067868986,0.000041579784,0.000011114531,0.000017644312,0.029938228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99077857,0.002117911,0.00044076485,0.0010272331,0.0039396044,0.0016959566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99002683,0.004067592,0.0015827833,0.00054612296,0.0024692174,0.0013074329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009738086,0.00013072879,0.00046588338,0.0010151099,0.007695199,0.009854127,0.0014028951,0.007792804,0.001489187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023824148,0.00037984742,0.00041170814,0.0007257053,0.015437824,0.0057279053,0.0059971623,0.009447056,0.00027662565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029339813,0.000045294895,0.0068885903,0.0001678878,0.000021163594,0.000880705,0.034751054,0.00026968325,0.0010436178,0.9057284,0.00765637,0.042517766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083194995,0.00047355835,0.100270174,0.002645485,0.00010279041,0.0020111753,0.04147319,0.002457495,0.002825692,0.29684573,0.55056494,0.0002465901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06934806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119990245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06934806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009432524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023248918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13788885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001130030","doi":"10.1017/s0008197301680619","title":"<scp>HOW OLD DID YOU THINK SHE WAS?</scp>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Parliament; Law; Assertion; Element (criminal law); Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Archaeology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.027043065203731762,"score_gpt":0.2829666507860069,"score_spread":0.2559235855822751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001130030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006421307,0.0063463994,0.0014923351,0.40021074,0.016243765,0.00010828167,0.0030903153,0.00034615767,0.56574076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.090055674,0.0045360085,0.0011049565,0.22416121,0.0052823126,0.00020740135,0.0013704608,0.00033532007,0.67294663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913687,0.00023144337,0.0000310067,0.00011015929,0.0003089093,0.00018162734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801385,0.00038243894,0.00015378521,0.000115382965,0.0009813234,0.00035324195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094776356,0.0004631498,0.0003557371,0.0006872064,0.004052948,0.0034957728,0.0005559776,0.003577998,0.09703283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007259829,0.00013766145,0.00026865004,0.000518001,0.001965807,0.0034977216,0.0016729612,0.0037559418,0.061557528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009540654,0.0000058564306,0.0005911165,0.000031779353,0.0000012092253,0.0001333169,0.0021355385,0.000007411374,0.00006725881,0.0053413473,0.9716688,0.0200069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001569429,0.000007539418,0.001013075,0.00013419212,0.0000011863099,0.00032531578,0.0051253773,0.000024391378,0.00007144154,0.0019166433,0.9913685,0.000010810322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024414366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042066596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09703283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024683576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015627526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32460713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001489085","doi":"10.7202/1002367ar","title":"A Theory of Fiduciary Liability","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Law; Law and economics; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Economics; Business; Duty","score_opus":0.07976588171203447,"score_gpt":0.30689945305939625,"score_spread":0.22713357134736178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001489085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074589276,0.0066443775,0.34177667,0.031701274,0.0007465104,0.0001681798,0.00019062846,0.00013025197,0.6111831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6950474,0.010801919,0.13350478,0.01397223,0.0024447157,0.0010898752,0.0003337261,0.0001288232,0.14267658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442816,0.0017889371,0.00030065718,0.0007503463,0.0021469763,0.00058492617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964007,0.001939979,0.0003304583,0.00048701654,0.0006600245,0.0001817938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053566713,0.0008195091,0.0008554962,0.0029130273,0.004518604,0.006341081,0.0024700945,0.007633474,0.006667614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070122937,0.0005756851,0.0015491947,0.001861403,0.021301443,0.008799738,0.0038785161,0.006190895,0.0018497354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.403959e-7,0.0000013615058,0.000007905032,0.000002577797,4.2714845e-7,0.00000875692,0.000035935736,0.00010930674,0.000004885514,0.9989208,0.00046654,0.00044125438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003723474,0.00000561574,0.00003092306,0.000039979877,0.0000020351592,0.00006192618,0.000035241494,0.00083954254,0.000032393837,0.97914827,0.019795587,0.000004728991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004534078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026709132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007633474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072371066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070555094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05250913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002955568","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01147.x","title":"Married Women Bankrupts in the Age of Coverture","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Law; Family law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Economics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05823852396653272,"score_gpt":0.36629904452784495,"score_spread":0.3080605205613122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002955568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93602234,0.0042594443,0.00060102664,0.01594566,0.00033907086,0.000026064805,0.000054934775,0.000015120712,0.042736284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913804,0.0016363086,0.00007314031,0.002458905,0.00010824714,0.000006616103,0.00000947704,0.0000022866056,0.0043245708],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924004,0.00027497276,0.000045209166,0.0000699155,0.00008269907,0.00028715393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990513,0.00038402123,0.00027451004,0.000068884605,0.000064359796,0.0001569315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014400479,0.00011056499,0.00030776593,0.0005401166,0.006304678,0.0020173534,0.00019397924,0.0017720567,0.0037343507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056092283,0.00029359752,0.00016183473,0.00056739245,0.0042133927,0.0018018126,0.0028802908,0.0019840996,0.00049744814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025950206,0.00023013266,0.16944239,0.00011219253,0.000041468622,0.021318821,0.5252365,0.00015044006,0.002095304,0.15423647,0.022844568,0.10403218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055894783,0.0004720467,0.10871544,0.0006422091,0.00008738109,0.03159928,0.52264,0.0003730751,0.001702386,0.025224827,0.30840045,0.00008706284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006516489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01304939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006516489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077297003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008178342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012957096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003922734","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2008.00081.x","title":"Rights-based justifications for the tort of unlawful interference with economic relations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Plaintiff; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Strict liability; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.09846264614462974,"score_gpt":0.362582794066692,"score_spread":0.2641201479220623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003922734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04482499,0.0032237777,0.08206892,0.06379977,0.0007767593,0.00016903521,0.00032405506,0.00011198039,0.8047008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95149726,0.0011890924,0.009972931,0.004362164,0.001438105,0.00023675816,0.00012453418,0.00008486438,0.031094251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889064,0.003883121,0.00061358063,0.001585787,0.0034897947,0.00152132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860422,0.008263701,0.001449607,0.0020024045,0.0016182906,0.000623856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012716786,0.00075581606,0.0009044351,0.0036085201,0.0049827755,0.008273413,0.002879443,0.014607754,0.015073414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017440597,0.0007047444,0.0020730186,0.0011208582,0.033738077,0.013434347,0.006134983,0.010103297,0.001624285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014461813,0.000004971346,0.000020765901,0.00000493761,0.0000010632865,0.000018177612,0.000081604114,0.000058630674,0.000013701529,0.9993543,0.00023288411,0.0002075136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001702455,0.000006139532,0.00013228403,0.000038337657,0.0000047133394,0.000050186994,0.00009727472,0.00062902656,0.00008559016,0.9892691,0.009662313,0.0000080717555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00278049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029194162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015073414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005685317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00289839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06725359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003953273","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1714.2007.00048.x","title":"Remedies and Alternative Contracts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Business Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Damages; Normative; Law and economics; Common law; Breach of contract; Law; Process (computing); Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01943613472726323,"score_gpt":0.33084479609414263,"score_spread":0.3114086613668794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003953273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035327274,0.0045480984,0.26040286,0.04568564,0.0015058345,0.0006602863,0.00027677655,0.00038292762,0.65121025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83815515,0.00211522,0.072952814,0.013491552,0.0012344095,0.001038052,0.0001647061,0.00016672217,0.07068139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9368351,0.017107068,0.005129747,0.008581997,0.028144345,0.004201765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722262,0.010714614,0.0028461367,0.008220747,0.004955455,0.001036786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025767788,0.0009101142,0.0010912037,0.0026777135,0.006885202,0.00992273,0.0042279703,0.012552655,0.008901762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05089454,0.0006753709,0.0016951397,0.0015291885,0.03439172,0.012248276,0.0086107515,0.011704841,0.0012149197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026777627,0.000006891432,0.00006578545,0.000015080534,0.000004487836,0.000043730917,0.00019241952,0.00022857882,0.000055400436,0.9965835,0.00060066767,0.0022007644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025434943,0.000031079908,0.0002726286,0.00022133897,0.000016078713,0.00020404473,0.00029893912,0.0014661759,0.00028418127,0.9439727,0.05316219,0.00004517229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004882903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004562929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025767788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006706734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011603382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1362747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004286390","doi":"","title":"That Can't Be Rights (Review of Robert Stevens's 'Torts and Rights')","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Liability; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024885780386617325,"score_gpt":0.2825179945316238,"score_spread":0.2576322141450065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004286390","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009472223,0.96390426,0.00019209232,0.018962346,0.0050742226,0.0000033402853,0.000016732833,0.0000071507147,0.011745169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003187607,0.9671017,0.00023714299,0.012980345,0.0058844783,0.000009266381,0.000035949986,0.000015964048,0.010547558],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828315,0.00056482304,0.00011211064,0.000170206,0.00075187813,0.0001178525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982718,0.0008853682,0.00020637613,0.000050803545,0.0004636552,0.00012202069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019492788,0.0007100472,0.0007751465,0.0030649332,0.0010807521,0.003814503,0.0010161201,0.0028959478,0.0061129434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050979485,0.0005150339,0.00061012,0.004384782,0.0042980104,0.0053538596,0.0015064267,0.003955961,0.0029157042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001472059,0.000018179791,0.00010717912,0.0019643905,0.000018085908,0.000104125764,0.00045391326,0.00017429887,0.00011793415,0.07466314,0.77198833,0.15037572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026071546,0.000008478634,0.00032850052,0.0015432754,0.0000060346147,0.00021190179,0.00013683495,0.000014218052,0.000029669329,0.00583311,0.9918785,0.000006975099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011656323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0217509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011656323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028485889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004191206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023176908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004954045","doi":"10.7202/1019051ar","title":"Justifying Fiduciary Duties","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Beneficiary; Corporation; Law; Law and economics; Business; Principal (computer security); Statute; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.040654380132251325,"score_gpt":0.3117595270626976,"score_spread":0.2711051469304463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004954045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046792403,0.0034992332,0.2356991,0.07293125,0.0017450504,0.00033442784,0.0002570247,0.0002448367,0.63849664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92104197,0.0013744688,0.04140588,0.009008847,0.0014539147,0.00046622808,0.00012216387,0.0001576854,0.024968795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775326,0.008120936,0.0016708289,0.0028760321,0.007964122,0.0018355156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767602,0.013989967,0.0018088071,0.0031286723,0.0038541986,0.00045811397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023528442,0.0008848445,0.0014574475,0.0034211332,0.009226807,0.007854165,0.0028715434,0.012571357,0.0049947784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042734545,0.00087166415,0.0011528685,0.0012608927,0.04075658,0.010184462,0.0062790117,0.012921932,0.0013114373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015329987,0.0000031608333,0.000033660588,0.000008079695,0.0000014559362,0.000018617278,0.00021339879,0.000060034756,0.000019189523,0.9986733,0.00038019905,0.00058738614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010992652,0.0000075120533,0.0001014789,0.00007434614,0.0000057258558,0.000045910867,0.00017594887,0.0006231998,0.00019269143,0.98282856,0.015920248,0.000013399526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042979326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004088089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023528442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074900887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072778245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12443179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005201898","doi":"10.1093/tandt/7.7.9","title":"Hong Kong's Private Unit Trust Structures","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Unit (ring theory); Library science; Queen (butterfly); The Internet; Management; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.04153485522455976,"score_gpt":0.33534441156528005,"score_spread":0.2938095563407203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005201898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06266953,0.01054459,0.0018819591,0.0333252,0.0025074417,0.00022033285,0.007819598,0.0004397469,0.8805917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16913456,0.004841363,0.00058157416,0.00096542574,0.00022283451,0.000048253336,0.0013850407,0.00009564772,0.82272536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992933,0.00009371854,0.00006083627,0.000077038734,0.000254445,0.0002205546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950073,0.00043177797,0.00041124385,0.0006752475,0.0019479425,0.0015264786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095717306,0.00027581293,0.00026609754,0.0006251682,0.0019740888,0.0042683883,0.00040567372,0.0009114401,0.10320263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040148953,0.00032275668,0.00017832758,0.0018677687,0.0012401054,0.0024258,0.0013287144,0.0008237377,0.013114068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011882303,0.00005033986,0.008705085,0.00037034115,0.000025769781,0.00061118003,0.0034277653,0.0004726749,0.0005759312,0.074800484,0.8334152,0.077426374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011746174,0.000021311907,0.010636532,0.00010620516,0.0000093426725,0.00009295219,0.0013318419,0.00024944995,0.00022614897,0.001392784,0.985905,0.000016684777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33258352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29912987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33258352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091377525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025577992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6612953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006134886","doi":"10.1002/iir.191","title":"Mortgagees and receivers exercising powers of sale – An English and Australian comparative analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Law; English law; Test (biology); Duty; Federal court; State (computer science); High Court; Political science; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer science; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.13581162522817558,"score_gpt":0.40354190336240753,"score_spread":0.26773027813423195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006134886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563458,0.0037827343,0.00010825081,0.0016172553,0.00001679751,0.000022602853,0.00010586386,0.0000013074687,0.037999395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872017,0.0037862347,0.00009448329,0.00030424076,0.000035759796,0.000019913465,0.00010511753,0.0000030141427,0.008449621],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972988,0.0012277445,0.00013037528,0.00017769785,0.00054405053,0.00062140374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954478,0.001894122,0.0014049319,0.00012511862,0.0008193535,0.00030867645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029030142,0.00018611962,0.00045668057,0.0032685117,0.002661524,0.0023762104,0.00064676115,0.0009755935,0.011961419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008611692,0.0002637322,0.00029976235,0.004848669,0.002309694,0.0029384522,0.0027631577,0.0012470215,0.00049497676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044204996,0.00067691255,0.25601858,0.0009180857,0.00022467942,0.007948814,0.42385554,0.00062233064,0.0008956703,0.23607159,0.01092489,0.061400775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003685872,0.00025955928,0.7400291,0.000679399,0.00022715268,0.0011457896,0.20402014,0.0006615133,0.00018322389,0.0047079492,0.048007645,0.000041638898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12272474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22155473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12272474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038672483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015138368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24402082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007696805","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2012.698885","title":"Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; English law; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Equity (law); Common law; House of Commons; Political science; Economic Justice; Unconscionability; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.043258160093453665,"score_gpt":0.35684425839838735,"score_spread":0.31358609830493367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007696805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26465848,0.018005015,0.00091483933,0.024675481,0.00040998944,0.000055614477,0.00023808859,0.000013087352,0.6910294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395392,0.0022439444,0.00019450589,0.004254522,0.00021586359,0.000036198904,0.000052530842,0.000016646976,0.053446554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599564,0.0010447707,0.00014780303,0.00031884562,0.0011121017,0.0013808609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975126,0.0014228901,0.00024794895,0.00011581414,0.0004356155,0.0002651629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042177164,0.00028488517,0.0002875052,0.0018858659,0.0066490453,0.0064527933,0.00087189936,0.0037174642,0.006017546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069322344,0.00028552202,0.00027995356,0.002365711,0.01369575,0.0044935034,0.0035294036,0.004485718,0.00051145017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033956017,0.000024646204,0.001427631,0.000029810933,0.000006665765,0.00044926043,0.03133714,0.00017519604,0.000097753466,0.9494157,0.009568561,0.007433632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061010825,0.00008398715,0.05762367,0.00078718504,0.000035028956,0.00037196086,0.026556367,0.000638939,0.0009890893,0.13831533,0.77444065,0.000096741285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23581332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30866057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23581332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025865996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007659265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4688815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008661519","doi":"10.7202/1027132ar","title":"La législation belge sur le surendettement","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023827105726030025,"score_gpt":0.26214971137351906,"score_spread":0.23832260564748903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008661519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048343718,0.022057131,0.005157193,0.066787995,0.0050035687,0.00021890442,0.0028164864,0.0006679589,0.84894705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13718162,0.005163426,0.005414347,0.030601447,0.00068351295,0.00016438718,0.0012285359,0.00028706552,0.8192756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932603,0.0012353632,0.0002425206,0.00076740346,0.002627401,0.0018669249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996894,0.0007422199,0.0003648766,0.0002750494,0.0012038253,0.0005199925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026922252,0.0005930086,0.00043817924,0.0012368908,0.0040909536,0.005380182,0.0011336143,0.005337167,0.020385386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005955141,0.00063071033,0.00076518103,0.0013123176,0.002150422,0.0016057028,0.0018839443,0.004924709,0.005188583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015777427,0.00014993687,0.007849335,0.0004408449,0.00004824742,0.0007748012,0.0053616064,0.0006150202,0.0036290176,0.4001854,0.5141881,0.066599846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011770644,0.000019472323,0.010557857,0.00012881822,0.00000937602,0.00011127182,0.0002587917,0.000049421797,0.00027171493,0.00072076987,0.9878401,0.000020518482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2997427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35057405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2997427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008293194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022015708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.595996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008978733","doi":"10.3366/shr.2010.0009","title":"<i>Civil Justice in Renaissance Scotland: The Origins of a Central Court.</i> By A. M. Godfrey. Pp. xiii, 486. ISBN: 9789004174665. Leiden: Brill, Medieval Law and its Practice Series, vol. 4, 2009. £152.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scottish historical review/˜The œScottish historical review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Brill; Law; The Renaissance; Economic Justice; History; Classics; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.019918845641916812,"score_gpt":0.2997408627463744,"score_spread":0.2798220171044576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008978733","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014454535,0.937981,0.00013546785,0.038293038,0.002546711,0.0000115046905,0.00010200968,0.000023197397,0.01946166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11559687,0.82733494,0.0005206743,0.013649819,0.0047825538,0.000048072437,0.00026593113,0.000036877787,0.03776425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803895,0.000636882,0.00011675278,0.00013841524,0.000681602,0.00038748054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972475,0.0009454953,0.00054357323,0.00008872408,0.00086283864,0.0003118409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030162153,0.0007328637,0.00074751955,0.002732874,0.0027660935,0.005232809,0.0012530241,0.0028917005,0.012977677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007383062,0.00055611937,0.00047467236,0.0057548336,0.005456373,0.005299652,0.0026578219,0.0025891168,0.0017601195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069810776,0.000022436434,0.0005203031,0.002239837,0.00003683832,0.00051363336,0.004556037,0.00013884404,0.00016717215,0.101993434,0.70939374,0.18034792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021637694,0.00003858977,0.006211773,0.0028977876,0.000027339438,0.00040227917,0.0023699945,0.00003910193,0.00010674352,0.012294995,0.97556984,0.000019941524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17250942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33615452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17250942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106631145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01662702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3430106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009206298","doi":"10.3366/elr.2010.0304","title":"“A Strange Archaic Provision of Mercy”: The Procedural Rules for the <i>Duellum</i> under the Law of <i>Clann Duib</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Clan; Sociology; Criticism; History; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.035471030898331035,"score_gpt":0.3424471035868621,"score_spread":0.30697607268853105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009206298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027094312,0.006961561,0.008241714,0.14963548,0.0013426144,0.000052671763,0.00011474341,0.00008025543,0.80647665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8870681,0.0017542769,0.001717299,0.011636815,0.00042427416,0.00006740352,0.000044562144,0.00012127741,0.09716606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995458,0.0023750903,0.00017753537,0.0006086205,0.00068017596,0.0007005854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976405,0.0012390574,0.00024148893,0.00026794223,0.00041657954,0.00019439151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054903156,0.00040678185,0.00030705496,0.0007238928,0.011688151,0.009844751,0.0016871144,0.006466681,0.0058542606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009593378,0.0006605699,0.00032265234,0.0007998443,0.028735053,0.007181443,0.0029793284,0.008664167,0.0009014987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007685528,0.000002924097,0.00008597445,0.000008479039,0.0000012453311,0.000049771716,0.0064746174,0.00003852955,0.000034991874,0.9766863,0.01516186,0.001447774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002460162,0.000022356346,0.0016930529,0.00042309775,0.000015895108,0.00021017963,0.013461293,0.00049500086,0.0004582303,0.47063327,0.5124999,0.000063115556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06420717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092184536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06420717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00984108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006275339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12766689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011161635","doi":"10.1353/ecf.0.0141","title":"Reforming Character: William Law and the English Theophrastan Tradition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Character (mathematics); The Renaissance; Slavic languages; Politics; Classics; Sociology; Media studies; History; Art history; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.00844928432593043,"score_gpt":0.24330217408111904,"score_spread":0.23485288975518862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011161635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038649056,0.021224363,0.0023527755,0.061681423,0.0006843282,0.000024766023,0.00003441463,0.000032477452,0.87531644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8893351,0.005838111,0.00075110025,0.0037118578,0.00047247473,0.000032036307,0.000012847762,0.0000373132,0.099809036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868053,0.0007082653,0.000038969265,0.00013016778,0.00020591792,0.00023612705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983198,0.0010762112,0.00014020961,0.00013519119,0.00020769516,0.00012090536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018052385,0.00017772905,0.00022045117,0.0009844961,0.007350223,0.005598421,0.0005579718,0.0017639088,0.0031794095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003643521,0.00015746089,0.00008786472,0.001229509,0.032810237,0.0042526685,0.0016013386,0.00275402,0.0003524141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037824282,0.0000046701007,0.000119219214,0.00001120938,5.3210744e-7,0.000040442515,0.0137735875,0.00002339321,0.000018056748,0.9766416,0.0051304824,0.0042331186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014307554,0.000015508014,0.00090782135,0.00021933981,0.000004799062,0.00011083252,0.013627029,0.00021085881,0.00015916338,0.3671938,0.61752117,0.000015330206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059609275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08448171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059609275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009561675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050609154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11852461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012531672","doi":"10.1037/1053-0479.15.1.89","title":"Restitution, Myth, and Reality.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychotherapy Integration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Psychology; Psychotherapist; Mythology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Theology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0375343406566268,"score_gpt":0.3871348398684812,"score_spread":0.3496004992118544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012531672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025753314,0.05478797,0.0143645955,0.36718014,0.0024504182,0.000061320454,0.00008135394,0.00008340121,0.53523743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94339,0.007877477,0.0032995204,0.022909844,0.001169473,0.00016803312,0.00004266522,0.00006435532,0.021078495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032474,0.006579385,0.00032963473,0.0006228984,0.0014977574,0.00064557296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319816,0.004536627,0.00052567886,0.0007521246,0.0006067289,0.0003808096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00899872,0.0003331355,0.00060007954,0.001399413,0.007563456,0.007983352,0.001860635,0.0063171596,0.0040009962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018541345,0.00028925133,0.00041183297,0.0009125707,0.0756756,0.009699385,0.0051051485,0.009557459,0.0005567802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096092945,0.000015165483,0.00012235306,0.000026878093,0.000003457931,0.00006618044,0.004365729,0.00003243211,0.000028583298,0.9857164,0.0052112443,0.004402096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002550751,0.000020546195,0.0005735385,0.00039952243,0.000008175932,0.000262689,0.008582787,0.0002899124,0.00014524229,0.91212386,0.07755166,0.000016562888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041230307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004139905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00899872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040289024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004969123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047590375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012710559","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2775","title":"The mystery of privity: <i>Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada v Robinson</i> (1915)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.017733287137583733,"score_gpt":0.2270689261279302,"score_spread":0.20933563899034646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012710559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19031785,0.016248181,0.0016554839,0.17961541,0.0009138998,0.00007268412,0.0003181926,0.00007232353,0.61078596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86312556,0.0029415318,0.00049619155,0.035396133,0.00017569495,0.00001902071,0.0000721314,0.00002623702,0.09774739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970559,0.0002602465,0.00003540556,0.00023438958,0.0010073795,0.0014067331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927026,0.00023460206,0.00007707142,0.00002103847,0.0002142137,0.00018286359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011638281,0.00016284459,0.00018204642,0.0006526853,0.018367201,0.005754697,0.0011844238,0.004925494,0.0031667675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026642645,0.00028248507,0.00022277185,0.00090696453,0.0112353135,0.0013199816,0.0017114108,0.0041987514,0.000275123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027676382,0.000010643111,0.0041195396,0.00006637149,0.000013189058,0.002150385,0.02796809,0.00026225008,0.0006495183,0.8595338,0.09443291,0.010765602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027132375,0.000035665413,0.023882153,0.00033975847,0.000049562444,0.0007662379,0.0338878,0.00036740486,0.0010399679,0.027532646,0.9119322,0.0001394852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98255986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99413353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06838462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06838462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073627815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49616742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013364851","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei132","title":"Homing Devices in Choice of Tort Law: Australian, British, and Canadian Approaches","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Choice of law; Tort; Law; Damages; Political science; Common law; Kingdom; Conflict of laws; Liability; Biology","score_opus":0.09087728675211142,"score_gpt":0.3248591918843926,"score_spread":0.23398190513228118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013364851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20117721,0.02200835,0.0026320897,0.03867789,0.0003426777,0.00014959277,0.00023149657,0.00003079605,0.7347499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682129,0.009185757,0.0023673798,0.0036570192,0.00007145801,0.0000609502,0.000055029006,0.000020418038,0.016369104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884538,0.0030806686,0.0003781116,0.0008056386,0.0044871042,0.0027946755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98817074,0.0044246265,0.00057325995,0.00039893616,0.0048501636,0.0015823384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00799025,0.00043127165,0.00075984106,0.0103422385,0.01928788,0.013511484,0.00316166,0.004122784,0.0064111953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018706141,0.0004541265,0.0005498603,0.014137546,0.023148453,0.0041273227,0.0051008877,0.0053064763,0.00025190198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004016371,0.000041353687,0.0046635936,0.00013520099,0.000021365766,0.0003248434,0.046671584,0.000397837,0.0001625565,0.9173459,0.006723874,0.023471734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005445261,0.00009466746,0.08354327,0.0026310063,0.00024107224,0.0008337354,0.15060815,0.0053240117,0.00048606968,0.2545193,0.5011844,0.00047984996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98677886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11466812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11466812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06984794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8319794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013425083","doi":"10.1093/ehr/ceq207","title":"The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians, and Courts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The English Historical Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Legal profession; Period (music); Middle Ages; Canon law; History; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Ancient history; Archaeology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.015706610135461808,"score_gpt":0.3057471770915269,"score_spread":0.29004056695606506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013425083","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033609574,0.9403997,0.00011409957,0.019301383,0.00059056917,0.0000025380352,0.000011437121,0.000003700692,0.036215633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1426273,0.83671,0.00022602307,0.0058269883,0.0021450454,0.000017901111,0.00002247434,0.000008702932,0.0124156475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800533,0.0011057387,0.00005876343,0.00015099609,0.0005265921,0.00015260371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767536,0.0013633833,0.000276316,0.000099198274,0.00037262074,0.00021320119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022499433,0.00032660482,0.0003154865,0.003165285,0.0021715476,0.0062107733,0.0006025065,0.0019863965,0.0026696294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004659062,0.00030502508,0.00011126049,0.0048032133,0.012738651,0.0046661366,0.0014571907,0.0028211756,0.00059352344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006649755,0.000046093588,0.0011234891,0.001374341,0.000029081206,0.00026121768,0.023216581,0.00017587269,0.00020904807,0.8034229,0.049808823,0.120266005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013669864,0.000031093135,0.005189153,0.0024323703,0.000014954633,0.00018307788,0.007922293,0.00005266642,0.0001151628,0.061600663,0.92243314,0.000011739347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029009555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043689657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029009555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071466924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061748675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05768138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014376924","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0023","title":"The Association of State and Indigenous Law: A Case Study in 'Legal Association'","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; State (computer science); Normative; Legal research; Political science; Association (psychology); Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Legal opinion; Associative property; Legal profession; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008501322687538827,"score_gpt":0.25486889242610916,"score_spread":0.24636756973857032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014376924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9004087,0.0006978315,0.0024934197,0.009118206,0.00008332279,0.0001163372,0.00001642005,0.000018631088,0.08704718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99105173,0.00051227864,0.0013820679,0.00049762375,0.000033816534,0.000058990416,0.000006788677,0.000006333315,0.0064503467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153686,0.005364347,0.0002086545,0.00043913844,0.0012855824,0.0011655153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99128425,0.005948096,0.00094485306,0.0004821676,0.0004922123,0.0008484811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008412254,0.00026258008,0.000495784,0.0015644289,0.029623121,0.0048161154,0.001744727,0.005246974,0.002528695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136148725,0.00050346827,0.0005043196,0.0030929851,0.017207688,0.0046480717,0.00793394,0.0057386365,0.00016649568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018810355,0.00021186771,0.014532717,0.00008521962,0.000012350058,0.02319728,0.7496154,0.00032290706,0.00039983157,0.19817767,0.0020970546,0.0113289505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021385365,0.000169386,0.02746725,0.0002742885,0.000060955055,0.022054255,0.8183103,0.0023034024,0.00062666996,0.025300436,0.10334195,0.00006965935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14813013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2940709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8518699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009852535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008773207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29453582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014939371","doi":"10.7202/1013386ar","title":"Mental Capacity in the (Civil) Law: Capacity, Autonomy, and Vulnerability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Autonomy; Construct (python library); Framing (construction); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.07018616730346944,"score_gpt":0.2966239825638687,"score_spread":0.22643781526039924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014939371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33291125,0.0077247657,0.03894711,0.13405709,0.0004175176,0.00008781132,0.00007118003,0.00006399196,0.48571923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954412,0.00050724,0.0009065374,0.0014664312,0.000060835173,0.000026422937,0.0000073918154,0.0000049529663,0.0015788695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963846,0.0021930882,0.0001122346,0.00024445422,0.0005026791,0.0005629714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931257,0.004248483,0.0007780934,0.00052864116,0.00037938208,0.0009396645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041156947,0.00021813763,0.00023051309,0.0013628127,0.0028750298,0.0063391165,0.00092504505,0.0021039685,0.0027804833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010215609,0.00016200086,0.00028730568,0.0006856442,0.059847742,0.008024517,0.007009455,0.0033086909,0.00015208783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063742527,0.0000144266805,0.001523337,0.00001420475,0.0000028268719,0.00008475313,0.007737863,0.00017778245,0.000059246886,0.98489445,0.00066739763,0.0048173354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010556774,0.000024298126,0.0032122398,0.00014721692,0.0000053802487,0.00029876505,0.00982735,0.00063982705,0.00015026404,0.96353155,0.022127708,0.000024789582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004476826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029296067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063391165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042049205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039701066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030508935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015146938","doi":"10.7202/043814ar","title":"L’immixtion de tiers amicaux dans le mécanisme juridictionnel","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008774444267804228,"score_gpt":0.24342862223966316,"score_spread":0.23465417797185895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015146938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07460702,0.0047601997,0.03243947,0.08669049,0.001055033,0.00020820905,0.0003387359,0.00020451029,0.7996964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7568442,0.0012147739,0.006311607,0.010874753,0.00026057375,0.00017183826,0.00009019,0.000094780255,0.22413732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039066,0.0025454732,0.00021278753,0.001308569,0.0031041636,0.002438429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950629,0.0013755288,0.0003713419,0.00062077295,0.0017229845,0.0008465279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005654096,0.0006442048,0.0005434562,0.0014753178,0.013993946,0.010954347,0.0017769244,0.0058723358,0.011687699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008409716,0.000612423,0.0006561486,0.001638009,0.024342304,0.0057800743,0.0056756344,0.009598884,0.0010949074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015338976,0.000005084985,0.00062319357,0.000028019263,0.000008281577,0.00009569633,0.0093451,0.00015954614,0.00036053266,0.9781383,0.006585162,0.004635631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036039466,0.000055358334,0.012420083,0.00047326137,0.000063231084,0.00031942248,0.015516523,0.0018823773,0.0015231704,0.24180786,0.7257077,0.00019490781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6175697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7477413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6175697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04110862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04874748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7693651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015464647","doi":"10.7202/043970ar","title":"La lésion qualifiée : est-il possible de nuire impunément à autrui en droit québécois ?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007937926466275277,"score_gpt":0.2772049588996188,"score_spread":0.26926703243334354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015464647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24552663,0.0050793295,0.011934407,0.16461767,0.000850843,0.00017605723,0.00034678355,0.00014194341,0.5713263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8947085,0.0007857445,0.0019116184,0.009648204,0.00008804172,0.00006698883,0.000050743936,0.00003687984,0.09270332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965906,0.00059186463,0.000078534744,0.00043061492,0.00083341694,0.0014750236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713624,0.00062465266,0.00026030323,0.0002616599,0.0011451093,0.0005721046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029319462,0.0003371019,0.0004949164,0.00091732177,0.013089338,0.0066127833,0.0015147742,0.004882062,0.008310173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005592908,0.00023017159,0.00045573708,0.00085087336,0.021494217,0.003061431,0.0026772642,0.004780537,0.0005980697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022795968,0.00002538521,0.007493125,0.00006850413,0.000018847746,0.0006256744,0.01904631,0.00024664815,0.00081187714,0.9377848,0.015474296,0.018381728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047236812,0.000092200215,0.05589592,0.0009006118,0.00008075793,0.0011542479,0.07383605,0.0018138826,0.0027666318,0.16716805,0.6960044,0.00023999724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8568861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93307966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14311391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030450186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041014478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28791344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20162444","doi":"","title":"Unjust Enrichment and the Role of Legal History in England and Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; High Court; Doctrine; Commonwealth; Political science; Appeal; Hindsight bias; State (computer science); Common law; History; Restitution","score_opus":0.010804597232660964,"score_gpt":0.2586162968211432,"score_spread":0.2478116995884822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20162444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6317764,0.029584628,0.001473391,0.041762915,0.00025088427,0.00004436876,0.000049610728,0.000014789609,0.29504302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810418,0.0022308747,0.00029222062,0.0012956377,0.000043337728,0.00001582145,0.000009366196,0.0000067301203,0.015064122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970078,0.0012545101,0.00014011202,0.0002805609,0.00062297174,0.00069399236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961106,0.0016424675,0.00063455576,0.00023608656,0.0005448408,0.00083151227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030541238,0.00012760541,0.00039878138,0.0021007075,0.0066513126,0.0070008584,0.0006809699,0.0019653852,0.002720072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081127435,0.00030602157,0.00014031144,0.0014486621,0.02187718,0.0068053138,0.0059936587,0.0025867783,0.0001472466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036208083,0.00003557629,0.0059220754,0.000099215395,0.000007759036,0.00060762867,0.10476018,0.0001899304,0.00033385394,0.8614873,0.0018496137,0.024670636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024720966,0.00012155224,0.122182004,0.0016272407,0.000036265254,0.00097097456,0.07112351,0.001473057,0.00057956163,0.38014665,0.42158884,0.00012566861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21589756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37111253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21589756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019647636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008586172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42928177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016341494","doi":"10.7202/1027045ar","title":"Beneficiary-Initiated Modification of Trusts: A Comparative Examination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Law; Settlor; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Business","score_opus":0.06645468585408207,"score_gpt":0.32578849538259286,"score_spread":0.2593338095285108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016341494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82704014,0.0012320315,0.0028430275,0.0015316328,0.0000297317,0.00015587734,0.00021150283,0.000025895179,0.16693008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946873,0.0002099104,0.00022970422,0.0001085814,0.0000065131812,0.000016769472,0.00005521667,0.000006214127,0.004679747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808616,0.004384308,0.00074685074,0.0010491196,0.008774017,0.004184117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97016966,0.009319504,0.006134862,0.0026478062,0.0092717,0.0024565193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009131883,0.00014407551,0.00051051675,0.0030376837,0.0066773454,0.005954105,0.0023426397,0.0016623362,0.005789552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034270313,0.00032539893,0.00068967964,0.0029329865,0.006165172,0.003704774,0.0038780998,0.0021813647,0.00026815844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029908717,0.00028311336,0.2513199,0.00030353505,0.000212389,0.0022064112,0.104899734,0.0023709743,0.0019249496,0.55194306,0.003609902,0.08062702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009638251,0.00042900673,0.8011681,0.00054948585,0.00028968765,0.0012073825,0.08388365,0.0033181605,0.0015236699,0.016851755,0.090508394,0.00017430195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56809855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7828778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56809855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04277538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02506114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86889005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016647311","doi":"10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00038-6","title":"Resource allocation decisions in Canada's health care system: can these decisions be challenged in a court of law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Medical Association; Canadian Nurses Association","funders":"Canadian Medical Association","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Harm; Context (archaeology); Health care; Resource allocation; Law; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Business; Liability","score_opus":0.1024100849956399,"score_gpt":0.39642299333679504,"score_spread":0.2940129083411551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016647311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02292725,0.0015101667,0.0032735437,0.8086399,0.001480812,0.00024848804,0.0005930293,0.00008335746,0.16124338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48154315,0.0015775169,0.008160891,0.46535483,0.0018374188,0.00042500262,0.00023782536,0.0001249385,0.04073841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93061507,0.01712587,0.0024694095,0.004436535,0.021627748,0.02372538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8911126,0.056468856,0.004683453,0.0029151042,0.026995393,0.017824553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06450283,0.0011403146,0.0026672145,0.00458653,0.036380142,0.03336517,0.01250587,0.06741874,0.009984211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18546444,0.0017972891,0.0026643558,0.004708254,0.03894427,0.012936251,0.007891152,0.04271444,0.00090503297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006446797,0.000081702376,0.0020254904,0.000065234985,0.00010498679,0.00027461236,0.00337181,0.0014799724,0.00014614752,0.8829949,0.10460328,0.0047874204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006477574,0.00009043167,0.007758628,0.00134674,0.000394894,0.00015220587,0.010838899,0.008340623,0.00075562246,0.71645916,0.25259283,0.0006222475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9415269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96400326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86796415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13203587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4045048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9579917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017701405","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1128","title":"JUSTIFYING FIDUCIARY REMEDIES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Economics; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.019099113735496668,"score_gpt":0.25268118527066724,"score_spread":0.23358207153517058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017701405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098286614,0.002865688,0.12756903,0.099332266,0.0019174421,0.0003467031,0.00018094681,0.0004332219,0.6690681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95184404,0.00050945836,0.015552947,0.0104788635,0.0005895915,0.00017499743,0.000034519853,0.0000718671,0.02074372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97712225,0.005921977,0.0013688646,0.0030182474,0.008976325,0.0035923112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97243315,0.015837621,0.001990241,0.004649922,0.004276288,0.00081276975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020002278,0.0007573889,0.0010968482,0.0017484266,0.0057236184,0.008975435,0.0028539111,0.015914088,0.005827099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047186684,0.00060640735,0.00083519565,0.0006975483,0.026189419,0.0074751135,0.0071409666,0.011309936,0.0009144694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056086574,0.000009876278,0.00013748815,0.000013737589,0.0000041475837,0.00005384175,0.00025203335,0.00020816692,0.00011867601,0.9964803,0.0012410737,0.0014751515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042972213,0.00003624951,0.00039084637,0.0001259599,0.000021906633,0.000109571614,0.00032200527,0.002334774,0.0009193439,0.9503757,0.045287006,0.000033603323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008475335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008831713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020002278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007996168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012726368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1057834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018345762","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.322","title":"Litigation Privilege: Transient or Timeless? <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Adversarial system; Governor; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0981673817290953,"score_gpt":0.3851083503480055,"score_spread":0.2869409686189102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018345762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008630313,0.014310427,0.00350357,0.8490163,0.004581877,0.000040186384,0.00016963319,0.00012729729,0.11962032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54819125,0.0093782665,0.002313236,0.36059162,0.0077819214,0.000089900466,0.00017103787,0.00017821322,0.07130456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98399746,0.0027378039,0.00097913,0.002447215,0.005318817,0.0045195315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976823,0.01155577,0.0021195218,0.0016721702,0.0044387025,0.0033908307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015703082,0.00032849124,0.001017311,0.0014536101,0.010342428,0.028745474,0.004215532,0.014043707,0.00904984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043739278,0.00049818034,0.0005488942,0.0014146098,0.038670644,0.019449476,0.0069083553,0.021150578,0.0013655911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021052707,0.000015327496,0.0014701518,0.000081030885,0.0000070851283,0.00030183615,0.004710068,0.000029221153,0.00018212867,0.8556741,0.11425706,0.023251025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020062784,0.000057054658,0.0064271274,0.001349017,0.000029659017,0.00093301595,0.016714513,0.00030081364,0.000614613,0.2109848,0.7624077,0.0001616759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24022728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4132047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7597727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027777443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035797298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47765803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018708350","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2007.00078.x","title":"The basis of the remoteness rule in contract","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Identification (biology); Action (physics); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05856460324819201,"score_gpt":0.342642214587948,"score_spread":0.284077611339756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018708350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039161015,0.003954461,0.33677977,0.025670776,0.00049817195,0.0002824501,0.00012927507,0.00010474237,0.5934194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89790124,0.0017518135,0.070448406,0.0035736822,0.0008949043,0.00046156975,0.00006955077,0.00008678488,0.024812102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846318,0.0061776005,0.00081993773,0.0023580112,0.0049135615,0.0010991963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854527,0.009706469,0.0010047035,0.0018891543,0.0015191707,0.000427786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016205883,0.0004885461,0.0008478933,0.0016284061,0.004498895,0.007342513,0.0021581529,0.006821948,0.006994652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023057653,0.00059813523,0.00126017,0.0011853504,0.040425897,0.0113514615,0.0045920257,0.008544816,0.0012284173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014675177,0.0000020235893,0.00002519905,0.000004825085,8.403569e-7,0.000015433076,0.00010053632,0.00011584215,0.000018250137,0.9990258,0.00010784739,0.00058188295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007487483,0.000006542618,0.000049439783,0.000021674265,0.0000014664583,0.000041778836,0.000048114714,0.0005050281,0.00004579598,0.99563295,0.0036353185,0.000004472989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029943958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012523857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016205883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038205525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004982875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08570588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019028309","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.250712","title":"THE OFFICE OF OWNERSHIP","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Business; Property rights; Subject (documents); Law; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Common ownership; Property (philosophy); Right to property; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01649052370239258,"score_gpt":0.23994697288744257,"score_spread":0.22345644918504998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019028309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012399308,0.004955407,0.021015044,0.038552992,0.0008023875,0.00004440958,0.00014076087,0.00006587396,0.92202395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7933124,0.0048060203,0.004003595,0.007967784,0.0012911842,0.00015087391,0.00012117165,0.00008877256,0.1882583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997063,0.00084539485,0.00011818437,0.0004860874,0.0006855945,0.00080182636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980438,0.000699384,0.00026945482,0.0003918051,0.00029468018,0.00030088995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028364826,0.00034050253,0.0003431696,0.0010327593,0.004970497,0.009355722,0.0013030743,0.0037339013,0.012512368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00451342,0.00032129133,0.00044100883,0.0011418196,0.021281105,0.010977201,0.004587673,0.0040259683,0.001796988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017225512,9.2555854e-7,0.000049142316,0.000002793967,3.7786634e-7,0.0000124447615,0.0004465875,0.000018094903,0.000007966295,0.9966275,0.0018893915,0.00094300846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011183371,0.000018511486,0.0004937246,0.0001246472,0.000008482219,0.0001207758,0.0013524997,0.00038736558,0.00016465156,0.5094261,0.4878793,0.00001272078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027070269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019334061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027070269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064095855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067053204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053825438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202003056","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Nature of State Legal Authority","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Legislation; Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.010366447155192705,"score_gpt":0.29477738519120567,"score_spread":0.284410938036013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202003056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093144834,0.0019034661,0.17970105,0.034282207,0.00032277155,0.00017057458,0.00010506942,0.00015490227,0.6902152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97977394,0.00033130814,0.007892738,0.001208288,0.00022507015,0.00013686207,0.00002066992,0.000025636407,0.010385504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869551,0.0056344136,0.000558403,0.0023415142,0.0032255738,0.0012849787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903646,0.0048364354,0.0008628343,0.0020736975,0.0012633844,0.0005991145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011326019,0.00025063584,0.0006612035,0.0014162483,0.005558234,0.008669037,0.0012716244,0.004232767,0.0036760804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019144012,0.00047326367,0.00067337754,0.0007848375,0.03929538,0.008692578,0.005245506,0.005318765,0.00058538537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016998954,0.0000026147634,0.00004561544,0.0000026446119,0.0000010812582,0.00000879168,0.00040606887,0.000065630506,0.000036296045,0.998638,0.000110628345,0.0006809228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012896663,0.0000099623285,0.00020854136,0.000029106764,0.000005173028,0.000032199634,0.0001802862,0.0006895858,0.00015121337,0.9875141,0.011157232,0.000009647002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038374148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002358902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011326019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005120633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007304423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059898436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020259455","doi":"10.1177/03058298000290010439","title":"Book Review: Catherine Redgwell, Intergenerational Trusts and Environmental Protection (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999, 240 pp., £45.00 hbk.)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Millennium Journal of International Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.02059144545585317,"score_gpt":0.26859746124701306,"score_spread":0.24800601579115988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020259455","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012352155,0.935641,0.0003185649,0.024521593,0.018898267,0.000039297338,0.00034348175,0.00007739326,0.020037018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013623398,0.8432837,0.0004187585,0.010041151,0.012540228,0.000062571424,0.00049386604,0.00007798971,0.13171935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949014,0.000083156854,0.000047217425,0.000080499674,0.00025188955,0.000047069552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974903,0.0011821422,0.00022582395,0.000054729928,0.0007852102,0.00026192341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010378872,0.001677519,0.0020066795,0.0042548943,0.0010214691,0.0031649002,0.0022784956,0.0027851467,0.07473973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033909082,0.00072887755,0.0005972651,0.0061875368,0.0010303393,0.004951788,0.0014649518,0.0032405127,0.05546121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009476141,0.0000051349302,0.00002496614,0.0006157528,0.000004486349,0.00002145901,0.00004259884,0.000030314774,0.000025994594,0.00054647785,0.9563303,0.04234307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008432266,0.000009662369,0.0002623484,0.0010494426,0.000009619486,0.0002042092,0.000072463416,0.000021389258,0.000031084943,0.0005443923,0.9977767,0.000010300026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012652421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0285586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07473973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023674301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002971613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25002927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021737991","doi":"10.7202/1028058ar","title":"L’expérience de la pratique privée au Canada","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016194296803047115,"score_gpt":0.27366460903609136,"score_spread":0.25747031223304423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021737991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41927958,0.0058986763,0.0027525064,0.073570065,0.00035589264,0.000048821614,0.00023411233,0.00006386422,0.49779657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239831,0.002112484,0.00036305588,0.003472465,0.000033365814,0.000016784266,0.000046591584,0.0000331918,0.06993896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956403,0.0009550049,0.000060610117,0.00030968362,0.0013944969,0.0016399018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997227,0.00090567674,0.0001536959,0.00009989973,0.0008963152,0.0007173271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017664816,0.00023763254,0.00039880627,0.0007110358,0.043739025,0.008890801,0.001303369,0.003426836,0.012288203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00390674,0.0003396078,0.00034486715,0.0023854068,0.0215567,0.002846287,0.004639698,0.007027084,0.00051871984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078921716,0.000056478915,0.005215042,0.00011523841,0.0000228994,0.0019806442,0.4333989,0.0008419473,0.0010841077,0.49653086,0.03282425,0.027850682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020005697,0.00004019775,0.011073079,0.00028574423,0.000026144355,0.00045280988,0.26376727,0.000646637,0.00051058695,0.011616905,0.71144503,0.00011558577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89076424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10923578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1352289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79256475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021813902","doi":"10.1108/eb026012","title":"Australia and Canada: The Role of Policy in Professional Liability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Contributory negligence; Strict liability; Tort; Res ipsa loquitur; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.02291332743394586,"score_gpt":0.33912614977126115,"score_spread":0.3162128223373153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021813902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055860892,0.019708278,0.0027182603,0.5976149,0.001855041,0.0001768249,0.00042094776,0.0001501869,0.32149473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75216687,0.01373973,0.0042959964,0.10560465,0.0005057339,0.00015818569,0.00017021436,0.000118785596,0.12323982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.974585,0.0042989408,0.00087777403,0.00157491,0.010252226,0.008411132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525024,0.014773298,0.0021384947,0.0011360189,0.016447604,0.0130020585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012561465,0.00036509073,0.0006891398,0.003141553,0.017850636,0.015805488,0.002606208,0.011313856,0.011826459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05171388,0.0007027076,0.0005721503,0.0042669256,0.012522646,0.004871757,0.005074497,0.009050717,0.0004979465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071754876,0.00007150893,0.007891139,0.00036717282,0.0000478379,0.0007180881,0.008982765,0.0013446722,0.00038865817,0.80272347,0.119854555,0.057538435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007344749,0.00008234228,0.060591895,0.0014374979,0.00009411912,0.00035559805,0.011966731,0.0028684929,0.0005889243,0.09855202,0.82312304,0.00026588704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98871636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1693791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1693791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41408572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9634025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023380777","doi":"10.7202/042230ar","title":"Les pouvoirs de l'exécuteur testamentaire : étendue maximale et durée","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Executor; Settlor; Estate; Administration (probate law); Duty; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.016756865764918083,"score_gpt":0.3040120960095668,"score_spread":0.2872552302446487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023380777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07784215,0.007742251,0.040881794,0.01907466,0.0011415203,0.00017908684,0.0009175514,0.0007324356,0.85148853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62841344,0.002938502,0.014701495,0.001395636,0.00050815364,0.00025137863,0.00034276713,0.0004590873,0.35098955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937697,0.001766377,0.00020494973,0.00056803116,0.0027282285,0.0009626779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991941,0.0030539376,0.0006154427,0.00080554554,0.002608701,0.00097529683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004779242,0.00076473167,0.0005482166,0.0010281908,0.006553676,0.009461849,0.0013480141,0.002704805,0.02536402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0156702,0.00060705387,0.00073800154,0.0010304345,0.008664965,0.0043542976,0.0018459177,0.0056978674,0.0045113363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027891283,0.00007640907,0.0045785084,0.00015923652,0.000024458679,0.00054320676,0.008504067,0.0014634042,0.0017753929,0.8751694,0.03260464,0.074822366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008471835,0.00016442747,0.025663808,0.0003904732,0.000021897564,0.0010303264,0.0041640266,0.002347031,0.0029419996,0.06067241,0.90236086,0.00015799029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38669774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4014813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38669774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015509626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016217168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76889384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025702348","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v2n2p42","title":"Discussion about Shareholders’ Right to Information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Business; Corporate law; Prosperity; Limited liability; Law and economics; Accounting; Shareholder resolution; Law; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.017385467989230748,"score_gpt":0.31065536442858027,"score_spread":0.29326989643934953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025702348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030675739,0.021039933,0.012211921,0.43919542,0.0018668931,0.00009271859,0.00019943924,0.00003610798,0.49468178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80207807,0.008937302,0.0031809665,0.11428334,0.0051571657,0.00016717742,0.00011723127,0.00005329347,0.06602544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98595643,0.005189504,0.00067275274,0.0024057545,0.0039306064,0.0018449052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874752,0.00959258,0.00063466537,0.00064697384,0.0013225178,0.00032802112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013157819,0.0004600984,0.0006825725,0.0013985164,0.006621757,0.0077320756,0.0023769883,0.016772518,0.008922015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018006075,0.00041832327,0.0011273947,0.0013669247,0.014936466,0.015489397,0.0038729638,0.013298098,0.00078304025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007824905,0.0000084134845,0.00023360217,0.0000389824,0.0000045772777,0.00015847474,0.002907796,0.000053681328,0.000136214,0.98663086,0.0061542746,0.003665283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003902978,0.00004968693,0.002002583,0.0006662267,0.000042726537,0.0004983754,0.0041780346,0.00065334945,0.0010522361,0.6021175,0.38863406,0.000066316024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010911937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060282173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016772518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058497274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003518406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06958598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026074531","doi":"10.1017/s0009840x05000995","title":"(A.) Smith (ed.) The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity. Essays in Honour of Peter Brown. Pp. xiv + 249, ills. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 2005. Cased, £45. ISBN: 0-9543845-8-X.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Classical Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; History; Classics; Environmental ethics; Theology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03280561441923194,"score_gpt":0.307295318945922,"score_spread":0.2744897045266901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026074531","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011490131,0.9680278,0.00024011545,0.011374938,0.0036465956,0.000008555365,0.000093723924,0.00002043747,0.016472932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032110936,0.90165687,0.00063001574,0.0038609912,0.0030086094,0.000032818185,0.00015563756,0.000034852914,0.08740915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999243,0.00024718812,0.000060175764,0.00010024957,0.0002896801,0.000059759313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875927,0.00049992563,0.00015240967,0.000043868207,0.00044817873,0.00009643062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013152907,0.0018982919,0.0012757259,0.00338703,0.0015300951,0.0023417806,0.000987663,0.0024132815,0.044596173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026574514,0.00081117114,0.0005785586,0.0048452877,0.0017297412,0.0051889694,0.0016207927,0.0031612318,0.029864801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001708926,0.000009059805,0.00013048203,0.0014441401,0.000013901608,0.000051664236,0.00050559134,0.00006314352,0.00009868632,0.0070030093,0.87190783,0.11875543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005102536,0.000011763953,0.00054373173,0.002132622,0.00001119124,0.00021288557,0.00034825274,0.00002676857,0.00005163739,0.005786446,0.990862,0.00000764381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01720623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02784729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044596173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002852865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004422294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14918905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026323366","doi":"10.7202/042225ar","title":"L'abus de pouvoirs du mandataire en droit civil québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"FLAGS register; Mandate; Law; Political science; Liability; Legal liability; Administration (probate law); Scope (computer science); Property (philosophy); Civil code; Civil procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.006091021235612999,"score_gpt":0.24631067048906913,"score_spread":0.24021964925345612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026323366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52161306,0.014446604,0.009405084,0.02411596,0.0009485537,0.00023214247,0.0014254627,0.000444409,0.4273688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8170355,0.0032147607,0.0027162249,0.0017426788,0.00019300928,0.000112646085,0.00026117018,0.00009698353,0.17462702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556446,0.0009324029,0.00013281187,0.0005012907,0.0019652229,0.00090388185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99466974,0.0020810303,0.00058377243,0.0003164528,0.0016847884,0.00066423044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031980781,0.000696021,0.0005825304,0.0016932905,0.011656625,0.0058487267,0.0013118951,0.0034754137,0.01769845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009273987,0.00049438974,0.0008510614,0.0014155209,0.004720486,0.0016919416,0.0013610766,0.0048641204,0.0013212482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052445714,0.00031910994,0.07506815,0.0005044843,0.00019202908,0.005361723,0.04138474,0.006060721,0.0055858665,0.5910636,0.08307871,0.19085631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009227445,0.00015424441,0.17740957,0.0005259719,0.000063061416,0.0012925457,0.0121008195,0.0040806322,0.0027761108,0.0075057535,0.7937529,0.0002460962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.961982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9608333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045261778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045261778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03620596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3283987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027430988","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2005.tb00270.x","title":"Revisiting pure economic loss: lessons to be learnt from the Supreme Court of Canada?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; CLARITY; Law; Transparency (behavior); Common law; Position (finance); Test (biology); Convergence (economics); Political science; High Court; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.05625833674962344,"score_gpt":0.33725167220055585,"score_spread":0.2809933354509324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027430988","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04050023,0.124178104,0.005980403,0.62903255,0.0035308546,0.00006723633,0.00044938567,0.000089654044,0.19617158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78313637,0.07458599,0.0060076755,0.11051095,0.0019248896,0.000054988282,0.00022416835,0.00013538286,0.023419611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829699,0.0023027074,0.0005467402,0.0012158856,0.008836344,0.004128401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770737,0.008384467,0.000732592,0.0006820094,0.011367246,0.0017598734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012079946,0.0006612338,0.001293145,0.0053655375,0.018573035,0.020167982,0.0047731875,0.0076407013,0.0033078261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030503966,0.00052910513,0.0008250975,0.0077034547,0.038541712,0.010560345,0.0060324157,0.012674516,0.0003346092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019307174,0.00001800234,0.0016346095,0.0001631606,0.000029593448,0.00031961076,0.007812935,0.0006958279,0.00011087678,0.9202123,0.037615642,0.031368006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066378976,0.000029882387,0.0139777735,0.0025094585,0.00015629458,0.00028372137,0.034145683,0.0022794034,0.0004752669,0.4652203,0.480528,0.00032792147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99328256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16568048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16568048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31606725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027593453","doi":"10.7202/042331ar","title":"Le droit de recours de l'entrepreneur contre l'ingénieur ou l'architecte à la lumière d'arrêts récents de la Cour suprême","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Supreme court; Law; Action (physics); Political science","score_opus":0.006160706500207325,"score_gpt":0.26485359837522,"score_spread":0.25869289187501265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027593453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048019756,0.0521064,0.006130163,0.110933706,0.0034596764,0.000032234107,0.00014783395,0.00008716857,0.77908313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63426644,0.019430375,0.0021207507,0.021243276,0.0029012947,0.00003725961,0.0000985255,0.00008817218,0.31981388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951385,0.0012116309,0.00016236707,0.00065632863,0.0020553768,0.0007756774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949557,0.0031535313,0.0005100455,0.0002889617,0.0007492773,0.00034247636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034632804,0.00035990335,0.00043235917,0.001066793,0.0055176667,0.0073359967,0.0007937961,0.0046835295,0.010310933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100976955,0.00029640523,0.0003355164,0.0012608771,0.00629523,0.003232867,0.001977568,0.005517125,0.0014814931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023816725,0.000014731104,0.0010923534,0.000049839913,0.0000066124294,0.00033281712,0.0029707209,0.00018339287,0.00020209764,0.93394446,0.032988846,0.028190307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007850287,0.0000288534,0.0026425354,0.00024096023,0.000009429091,0.00038578518,0.0018498034,0.00023220948,0.0003782309,0.056930665,0.93726426,0.000029343291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034745954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048032563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034745954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00534356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049426733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069087446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027966761","doi":"10.1504/ijcg.2008.020631","title":"Regal (Hastings) v. Gulliver: An equitable principle stretched too far?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Corporate Governance","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Scope (computer science); Fiduciary; Law and economics; Law; Rescission; Corporate governance; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; Business; Economics; Management; Computer science; Duty","score_opus":0.0789317348325333,"score_gpt":0.34044659435106506,"score_spread":0.26151485951853176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027966761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06261127,0.006966173,0.014512857,0.16268058,0.0013591101,0.00008186873,0.000094782554,0.000093758295,0.75159955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86580956,0.002032327,0.0032142885,0.076243415,0.00047082602,0.00012613127,0.000034895962,0.000045920606,0.052022573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99290377,0.002144629,0.00037422078,0.0010506167,0.0020403937,0.0014863834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726856,0.0014968552,0.00035457316,0.00028149225,0.00040450043,0.00019401166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065807225,0.00029883126,0.00045772636,0.0007042778,0.004927182,0.005776086,0.0014301853,0.006173355,0.0029489836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013594991,0.0003371969,0.0004698047,0.00078778487,0.011748021,0.005025845,0.005612431,0.005925399,0.00053453946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053383756,0.000003390147,0.00021221068,0.000013507938,0.000003289072,0.00009075174,0.0010062287,0.00006815626,0.000053558997,0.990257,0.004373451,0.003913109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003729401,0.00007467502,0.002057069,0.00044895353,0.00003299346,0.00039896002,0.0025475502,0.0003133304,0.0012805514,0.579012,0.4137242,0.00007244741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027596377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042253148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027596377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035645885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007159273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0548715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028132958","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebt012","title":"Protection Against Unilateral Dispositions of the Family Home - An Irish Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Irish; Legislature; Veto; Law; Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Family law; Political science; Common law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.027985795494629186,"score_gpt":0.3344826306900675,"score_spread":0.3064968351954383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028132958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12174046,0.0035883023,0.0061830245,0.0726332,0.0007629961,0.00009315037,0.00016438906,0.000053171843,0.7947813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92083573,0.0029808779,0.0024147737,0.013689545,0.0003797181,0.000094498944,0.000069401474,0.000028522127,0.059506904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880391,0.0040150913,0.0005530732,0.0011709173,0.0024485153,0.003773337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957961,0.0014582515,0.00045845244,0.00070917985,0.000814854,0.00076328876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010615062,0.00033164865,0.0005390661,0.0011458216,0.0075280746,0.009984871,0.0024951962,0.0055604195,0.004420069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010760116,0.00048437787,0.0010568534,0.0007301512,0.02683301,0.0052174297,0.009095028,0.0076595,0.00072826416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018276796,0.00003100511,0.0021573924,0.00003415725,0.0000067095343,0.00037703215,0.009744145,0.00030913242,0.00019310396,0.9729475,0.004580026,0.009601593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009435073,0.00030263033,0.020264156,0.0019374484,0.000113731236,0.0016500374,0.077610224,0.0011586108,0.002640115,0.30575827,0.588148,0.00032238988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.142373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1426642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.142373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016143518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02619497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28308856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028974913","doi":"10.1002/iir.161","title":"Piercing the veneer of the trust in the South African Trust Law: Liability of trustees of a business trust for fraudulent trading","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Blind trust; Express trust; Settlor; Business; Trust law; Debt; Estate planning; Liability; Law; Testamentary trust; Law and economics; Embezzlement; Finance; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.07837643684443923,"score_gpt":0.33755742409375594,"score_spread":0.2591809872493167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028974913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5109957,0.0041047167,0.016199617,0.07923669,0.00040396178,0.00021159335,0.00007904588,0.000049699807,0.38871896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98532355,0.00042877893,0.0006961156,0.002579603,0.000054968532,0.000029068216,0.0000044051403,0.0000058445294,0.010877663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942484,0.0021430904,0.0005292126,0.00054675154,0.0011764196,0.0013560936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868281,0.0076062446,0.0019288888,0.0012379431,0.0015050523,0.00089370867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006078113,0.00026596338,0.00028758027,0.0009534495,0.008488116,0.008030892,0.0009867996,0.01026088,0.00475395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023440933,0.00055174273,0.0004459084,0.00069808867,0.010470093,0.0067343153,0.0064155734,0.007950742,0.00047576995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003429482,0.000026138187,0.0051902966,0.00005234455,0.0000124064945,0.005759614,0.02126058,0.0002775893,0.0007770831,0.9548634,0.0062679327,0.0054783397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089007655,0.00034879294,0.02278839,0.0040614037,0.00027358724,0.024317618,0.08726299,0.013359956,0.0066853384,0.44067332,0.39980403,0.00033550625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02919962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02969908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02919962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055767936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074975053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058059335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030020203","doi":"10.7202/042951ar","title":"L'hypothèque de la chose d'autrui","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009746233914594166,"score_gpt":0.27463347538476296,"score_spread":0.2648872414701688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030020203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29653102,0.0027001463,0.21622378,0.014300935,0.0006998429,0.00090700545,0.0013893099,0.00017990866,0.46706796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506103,0.0006738801,0.016980268,0.0012699981,0.00017590499,0.00039737584,0.0003371885,0.000053253192,0.029501889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460185,0.0012986712,0.00037626762,0.0014742689,0.0014915817,0.000757518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885174,0.0069092633,0.0013280519,0.0018051094,0.0009207647,0.0005194072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006112599,0.00092406146,0.0012195737,0.00097464066,0.0018167866,0.0034643766,0.0019942892,0.0025765882,0.028052822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014193133,0.00061470683,0.0022486388,0.00062868005,0.0055176066,0.0044843764,0.0035866515,0.0030921516,0.0023452656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005549705,0.00018220181,0.027861264,0.0004547877,0.0003211133,0.0012492357,0.003016852,0.0043761935,0.003515185,0.9219515,0.0029696012,0.03354717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037071854,0.0010086906,0.05204964,0.0004959982,0.0004356903,0.0029942857,0.0058001615,0.013645884,0.004625798,0.8336616,0.08474437,0.00016716192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029940968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023255001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028052822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019901823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018766946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09384608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030095932","doi":"10.1093/arbitration/29.4.641","title":"Retrial Ruling of the Supreme People's Court Settles the Disputes on the Jurisdiction over Joint Tort Cases - Litigation or Arbitration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arbitration International","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Arbitration clause; Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Dispute resolution; Federal Arbitration Act; Tort; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Tribunal; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.03838454261180092,"score_gpt":0.30141069476202464,"score_spread":0.26302615215022374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030095932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18925413,0.005590544,0.027964124,0.05579062,0.0042661643,0.000747358,0.00040336745,0.00037418556,0.7156095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8271853,0.0011455936,0.007724672,0.031143242,0.0011753689,0.0002535356,0.00013405926,0.00009166729,0.13114649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855586,0.0028438992,0.0014829262,0.0029008365,0.004490798,0.0027227914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99228865,0.0044113444,0.0005029405,0.00087892223,0.0015354471,0.0003826286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015814243,0.0006351331,0.0012692066,0.001493726,0.011016833,0.007649594,0.0034508726,0.012870265,0.0074911136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015549121,0.0006965665,0.001760163,0.001614514,0.011496633,0.004107262,0.0050399113,0.01371045,0.0014312406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004002466,0.00003082307,0.0019824824,0.0000733215,0.000042627693,0.0020188272,0.0058659296,0.0002559318,0.0021383488,0.9582209,0.013674081,0.015656577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016461387,0.00035718168,0.009834032,0.0007057476,0.0003222003,0.0019430368,0.0068505346,0.0040354203,0.008378279,0.346108,0.62093455,0.0003664857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039741535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061601076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039741535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007473634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014660961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083634734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030259643","doi":"10.1163/20512996-90000098","title":"Aristotle and the Law Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polis The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Politics; Citizenship; Rhetoric; Element (criminal law); Political science; Pride; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01985774532822391,"score_gpt":0.3139814184096376,"score_spread":0.2941236730814137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030259643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012084208,0.032107066,0.007211855,0.053588167,0.0013712797,0.000025997462,0.000066612745,0.000043250682,0.8935015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8270383,0.01378671,0.00811842,0.014416733,0.0026534097,0.0000855505,0.000073084484,0.00006511802,0.13376279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971842,0.0012930569,0.00008987114,0.00036413386,0.00074064016,0.00032812983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990307,0.0004861896,0.000078755496,0.00010095043,0.00020725085,0.000096253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002208061,0.00038830013,0.00047279603,0.0018348256,0.0063599837,0.0053990567,0.00055693707,0.00408251,0.00464126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034383486,0.0002519613,0.00027975932,0.0011764925,0.028162682,0.0047491016,0.0019945817,0.00423497,0.0010465448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028712152,0.0000021374615,0.000019956373,0.0000054534385,7.3293984e-7,0.000012606845,0.0005270996,0.0000453533,0.000008435446,0.99540764,0.0023529644,0.0016147314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008406504,0.00000638798,0.00013274209,0.00004462654,0.0000012339174,0.000022609418,0.00034325224,0.0000903444,0.000024890125,0.9056828,0.09363742,0.000005421072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010675452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012179197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010675452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067789624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004320229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049184978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031179565","doi":"10.2979/gls.2007.14.2.235","title":"Civil Society Constitutionalism: The Power of Contract Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Public law; Commercial law; Tort; Delict; Social contract; Comparative law; Civil society; Private law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Black letter law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03140292766371281,"score_gpt":0.3616155692381673,"score_spread":0.33021264157445446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031179565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026198512,0.01361868,0.052744593,0.22546121,0.0013348197,0.0000678182,0.00009865569,0.00009626002,0.68037945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579164,0.0038515183,0.0049240226,0.012529581,0.0018535746,0.00015232983,0.000047402882,0.000068809895,0.01865639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839454,0.008854993,0.0003712986,0.0017942914,0.0033604424,0.001673602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859801,0.009783868,0.00074739836,0.0015781373,0.0010255928,0.0008848784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01960905,0.0004322776,0.0005936417,0.001986802,0.009874959,0.016262366,0.0018248734,0.008540369,0.00488433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022204045,0.00043677966,0.00067713327,0.0019589504,0.08682627,0.01411299,0.007163986,0.010405005,0.00063705735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1884435e-7,0.0000012132249,0.00001508555,0.0000026784082,4.83997e-7,0.0000070414326,0.00034718117,0.000037341728,0.0000052239825,0.9986811,0.00044982214,0.00045229858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000521753,0.0000027455565,0.000037120695,0.000026773649,0.0000011923772,0.000014069421,0.00030451117,0.00016811349,0.00002191406,0.98046756,0.018947635,0.0000032423795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013591788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071097086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01960905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012627719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0143935615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1037038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034908739","doi":"10.7202/1028140ar","title":"Protecting Possession, a Question of Values? A Comparative Inquiry into the Moralization of Possession in Brazil and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Law; Appeal; Adverse possession; Faith; Common law; Political science; Sociology; Land tenure; Land law; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.045600319507659984,"score_gpt":0.3516760804273876,"score_spread":0.30607576091972766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034908739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59954274,0.006843421,0.002180023,0.035285003,0.00013671219,0.00008849982,0.00017101612,0.000026825659,0.35572582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532795,0.0010752379,0.00019910038,0.00047933112,0.000005201227,0.00001017088,0.00001466723,0.000008212801,0.0028800587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953216,0.0011297904,0.00009263905,0.00026098132,0.0013695351,0.0018254636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953023,0.00149379,0.00037910492,0.00025035738,0.001782174,0.00079219666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00307644,0.00032717045,0.00067309977,0.0019592964,0.01962928,0.008093722,0.001555938,0.0018370234,0.0026917155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010392364,0.0003082649,0.0004745873,0.0037208495,0.025095403,0.0032432678,0.0035241905,0.003412359,0.00008888178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039055947,0.000036530808,0.007518237,0.0001411472,0.000025140776,0.00058432686,0.13156925,0.0006079202,0.0006166791,0.84029007,0.002791738,0.015779966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065345004,0.00010498419,0.09959227,0.0017780731,0.00015857902,0.0007995906,0.47800875,0.0028999522,0.0010392395,0.10657616,0.3086859,0.00029108927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98632807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99137974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11769136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11769136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104648136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8539146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035728806","doi":"10.1108/13590790310808727","title":"Preventing corporate failure: the Cadbury Committee’s corporate governance report","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit committee; Corporate governance; Stock exchange; Audit; Enforcement; Business; Chief audit executive; Internal audit; Finance; Joint audit; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06757351824286159,"score_gpt":0.2882434556933058,"score_spread":0.2206699374504442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035728806","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072473385,0.024175161,0.0060156337,0.597013,0.021684233,0.0007765404,0.0011956153,0.00051626726,0.34137627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16972326,0.022493375,0.014845479,0.22637554,0.009345235,0.0011843909,0.0022355774,0.00062538305,0.5531718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651138,0.0055816555,0.0019085475,0.0014750728,0.021353122,0.0045677344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97636104,0.004264512,0.0023377931,0.0013940175,0.011263392,0.0043791374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016524946,0.0008370649,0.00038449396,0.0029286277,0.007696623,0.011290496,0.0023153576,0.012241685,0.0062301015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04342358,0.00067890016,0.00053693645,0.0017654904,0.0064136838,0.0032875487,0.0046181586,0.007738675,0.002283745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008008251,0.000024033772,0.0007041538,0.0000592061,0.000005437289,0.00009733789,0.0007324373,0.00015656273,0.00010845042,0.05245109,0.92330194,0.022351263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012013355,0.000017850478,0.0029310947,0.00023288731,0.000006051425,0.000044739227,0.00035477712,0.0000893667,0.00015346476,0.0029921995,0.99312687,0.000038665992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4125176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4499522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4125176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01276451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07958783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.820233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036475377","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-008","title":"Corporate Fiduciary Duties and Prudential Regulation of Financial Institutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Corporation; Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Corporate law; Shareholder; Liability; Law; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.09868123007834605,"score_gpt":0.35699083718970587,"score_spread":0.2583096071113598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036475377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2340819,0.004177109,0.10167702,0.03211601,0.00047109343,0.00014644465,0.00008823917,0.00012091004,0.6271212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862959,0.00036919504,0.0038938224,0.0024037557,0.0001666082,0.00005734639,0.000013569076,0.000009626652,0.006790251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861362,0.00469237,0.0008383978,0.0017157309,0.0044946494,0.002122648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712622,0.011496278,0.0063286573,0.0045490325,0.0046959887,0.0016679524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122216875,0.00027454365,0.00039264973,0.001472831,0.003033862,0.0069508553,0.0014606266,0.0051556327,0.0022645213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02312338,0.0004442366,0.0006608485,0.000700828,0.020387586,0.0036590083,0.0039060162,0.0048610168,0.00031285733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007779773,0.000028158785,0.001118028,0.0000124634535,0.00000660732,0.00004813967,0.0006413389,0.0010767032,0.00025670658,0.991928,0.0007225222,0.004153603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002933936,0.000057798665,0.0070626074,0.00022210546,0.00003028527,0.00013960325,0.00046458966,0.00514009,0.0009985224,0.9547101,0.031089319,0.000055593126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009867679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00909339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122216875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060551423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007828016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06463528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037167014","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.969","title":"A Role For Tort In Pre-Contractual Negotiations? An Examination Of English, French, And Canadian Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Plaintiff; Mistake; Law; Tort; Negotiation; Database transaction; Business; Liability; Certainty; Unjust enrichment; Work (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Restitution; Economics","score_opus":0.0275917556304269,"score_gpt":0.30762062844209864,"score_spread":0.28002887281167177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037167014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041046415,0.047362246,0.0029476164,0.072524354,0.00030875765,0.000055082197,0.00016951986,0.000053421212,0.83553255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112207,0.024292387,0.0022596996,0.011050055,0.00034650162,0.000064131455,0.00009494461,0.000053219243,0.05061831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989262,0.0024900322,0.00018886702,0.0005938914,0.0033455717,0.0041196425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937323,0.0026916496,0.00045297976,0.00030657946,0.0021672333,0.00064922904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006415597,0.000604453,0.0005376206,0.0052471883,0.020966707,0.015865697,0.0030808086,0.006441974,0.008379609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013878859,0.00037256576,0.0008295319,0.0057693124,0.032685135,0.007989786,0.00281176,0.0043354523,0.00058892387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060152474,0.00000533438,0.0003482514,0.000018356188,0.0000015633665,0.000059824637,0.005187046,0.00006655266,0.000019188017,0.98713315,0.0029954442,0.004159419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027095459,0.000033227538,0.019874908,0.0010160216,0.000049381895,0.00044537312,0.025941659,0.0011329678,0.0002117982,0.21518816,0.73596936,0.00011007222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9573371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9446187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10767701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10767701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06956677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78125507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037372397","doi":"10.1017/s000819730327639x","title":"<i>Corporate Governance in Australia and New Zealand.</i> By J<scp>ohn</scp> F<scp>arrar</scp>. [Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001. xxvi, 472 and (Appendices and Index) 52 pp. Paperback £33.99. ISBN 0–19–551314–2.]","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Corporate governance; Exaggeration; Jurisdiction; Index (typography); Position (finance); Political science; China; Scope (computer science); Law; Management; Economics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.032420022928021944,"score_gpt":0.2548486047052972,"score_spread":0.22242858177727526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037372397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007085297,0.70852506,0.0008299247,0.057892255,0.006631696,0.000102984624,0.00046570695,0.00007973677,0.21838742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08867887,0.30733773,0.0015648344,0.005615649,0.0022660338,0.00016016989,0.0006062605,0.000101460464,0.593669],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995814,0.0000406329,0.000030868814,0.00004857337,0.00022969932,0.00006884686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995572,0.00007676494,0.000111112684,0.000022487791,0.000115702314,0.000116722156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051598693,0.0005696809,0.0004366679,0.0010145458,0.0012283325,0.0030056858,0.00048541976,0.001103417,0.016762998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018504224,0.0005346658,0.0002931908,0.0031748945,0.002011977,0.0034234717,0.0010974214,0.0018519326,0.0027175264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019910149,0.000026964852,0.0011448008,0.0008860414,0.000011824767,0.00026357916,0.0066562234,0.00020338102,0.00034448484,0.029850382,0.79950714,0.16108519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006890584,0.000016755263,0.014289024,0.00067506154,0.000007235595,0.000193732,0.0018816551,0.00011155606,0.000056626395,0.004448949,0.9783028,0.000009720812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29598516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47923258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29598516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073482534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007437406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5885247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037793309","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1109","title":"The Canadian Constructive Trust and the French Negotiorum Gestio: Two Institutions Serving one Same Legal Concept ?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Unjust enrichment; Law; Common law; Political science; Constructive; Doctrine; Equity (law); Tort; Lien; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law; Liability; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.014031420408215221,"score_gpt":0.3074975607740451,"score_spread":0.2934661403658299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037793309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10719369,0.012443968,0.006524153,0.057081882,0.00036980936,0.000066380104,0.00025196784,0.00007855028,0.8159896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96702474,0.0021149223,0.0016310076,0.0018866066,0.00006175856,0.000031650245,0.00005916051,0.000023296401,0.027166778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180096,0.0012529677,0.00011744367,0.0006498231,0.002911793,0.0032670097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962586,0.0008515646,0.00053310336,0.0002545253,0.0013244554,0.00077775936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028541596,0.00043779617,0.00051733805,0.0033209533,0.011655313,0.014135239,0.0017578664,0.0040248,0.009439152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009902107,0.00031573145,0.00065463857,0.0038373326,0.021615827,0.0057690246,0.0035534697,0.0030339325,0.0005158763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015952917,0.0000031392524,0.0007485044,0.000018091114,0.0000051721104,0.00006301726,0.0025634102,0.00009541938,0.000048540125,0.98865896,0.0020083322,0.005771384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006875229,0.00007260693,0.04407705,0.00077322073,0.00013745378,0.0006066417,0.053975265,0.0020980889,0.0009675187,0.3439231,0.5530402,0.00026011583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9186745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93264693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08873666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08873666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09418236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64383256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038570877","doi":"10.1017/s0714980800001537","title":"On Liberty for the Old","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre; Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Mill; Relevance (law); Negative liberty; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Autonomy; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.024881238993907425,"score_gpt":0.24879642766053683,"score_spread":0.2239151886666294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038570877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031710137,0.022182675,0.017068895,0.25612628,0.003442165,0.00006357408,0.00007533677,0.000034218574,0.66929674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8530167,0.009142455,0.0037779855,0.047445565,0.002924344,0.00010807404,0.000036207693,0.000041686566,0.083507024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675214,0.0017167093,0.000117999116,0.00032963612,0.0006251145,0.00045842698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645543,0.0019657705,0.00032514852,0.00033051398,0.000528564,0.0003946055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004674813,0.00039837425,0.00041511055,0.00076345674,0.0036538874,0.0045202323,0.0008613187,0.003711339,0.0052219783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007720565,0.00011850015,0.00032064688,0.00045741012,0.026079284,0.0052760583,0.004444179,0.006554645,0.0008237408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006941892,0.000010393611,0.00015888066,0.000010002075,0.0000012231184,0.00005988627,0.0016872991,0.00007626711,0.000028131348,0.9868976,0.007348379,0.0037150667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065516356,0.000030100839,0.00030788445,0.00016362665,0.0000037188638,0.00008546676,0.001374516,0.00027978368,0.00012720114,0.8483216,0.14928658,0.000012837992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002027722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001995989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052219783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037087465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022807135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026908994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040771768","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpp123","title":"Respect for the commercial meaning of franchise restrictive covenants: do the UK and Canada diverge?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goodwill; Appeal; Meaning (existential); Covenant; Convention; Position (finance); Franchise; Law and economics; Law; Raising (metalworking); Business; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Marketing; Engineering; Finance; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03634100098975821,"score_gpt":0.3155342543875744,"score_spread":0.27919325339781614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040771768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22110787,0.00974049,0.003993983,0.29832795,0.0005434993,0.000054067736,0.00035659192,0.000041528812,0.46583405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702481,0.0016565823,0.00061150565,0.01710165,0.00006153746,0.000016321987,0.000049568083,0.000024456911,0.010230212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98726684,0.0020904893,0.00047584504,0.0011449392,0.004695175,0.0043267678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822474,0.00569084,0.001396628,0.0010216618,0.007031791,0.0026116697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077923434,0.00022947082,0.0008334924,0.0015772441,0.014805126,0.019336801,0.0024133734,0.009705511,0.004185309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03140148,0.00042481575,0.00046419248,0.0039667985,0.036489844,0.008329805,0.0045052203,0.00974188,0.00043169982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060940547,0.000015065787,0.004241919,0.00005398735,0.000019227144,0.00029246358,0.030691233,0.00015677007,0.0002152651,0.9394566,0.0124600325,0.012336527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013924859,0.000061415834,0.052465394,0.0020806375,0.00017478633,0.00060950796,0.14981407,0.0014766393,0.000979503,0.41090745,0.38086244,0.00042888106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9619592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9746276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061983068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061983068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14330144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44972068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042208543","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1127","title":"Facts on the Ground and Reconciliation of Divergent Consumer Insolvency Philosophies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Debt; Debtor; Opposition (politics); Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.03783276758323504,"score_gpt":0.3068127772802049,"score_spread":0.26898000969696984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042208543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1190755,0.018206976,0.015762134,0.19353692,0.0027310783,0.00007135482,0.00029478237,0.00009553905,0.65022564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93704695,0.0064528007,0.0051592086,0.024439322,0.0021293126,0.00013140032,0.00024030758,0.00014805187,0.02425273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995139,0.0020678146,0.00023779615,0.00090336165,0.0010574706,0.00059451896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907069,0.0059205494,0.0006174916,0.0014043178,0.0010608069,0.00028997913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009990174,0.00038254494,0.00052211806,0.0024723234,0.0049270997,0.010289394,0.0014899969,0.0048036575,0.0065038167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012222539,0.00034561494,0.00042132262,0.0028373164,0.03966034,0.014854197,0.0049587404,0.011354133,0.00068453985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003028695,0.000009651015,0.00027498938,0.000021279151,0.000004763141,0.000094283896,0.008961554,0.000045730314,0.00006639409,0.9784491,0.005387577,0.0066544237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037012178,0.00002823466,0.0017327345,0.0003051808,0.000014513736,0.00026600843,0.011672213,0.0002608799,0.00030373177,0.7165228,0.2688184,0.00003821053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024741678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027488035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010289394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037981689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017680766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052833676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043582225","doi":"10.7202/042426ar","title":"L'incidence des privilèges et des hypothèques sur le régime légal de la société d'acquêts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Political science; General partnership; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Debt","score_opus":0.019312834794689697,"score_gpt":0.3040183266448632,"score_spread":0.2847054918501735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043582225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9012401,0.0028511418,0.008396339,0.008428474,0.00005977763,0.000082128034,0.0006633938,0.000037282305,0.07824141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778074,0.00047063612,0.00034985298,0.00005437466,0.000043956912,0.00002006867,0.000054652854,0.0000023640437,0.0012232591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788487,0.009195567,0.0012391582,0.0014647784,0.0056958026,0.0035560476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90149546,0.065491974,0.021491898,0.0039947913,0.004630046,0.002895798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017952014,0.00025797123,0.00061754044,0.0044640824,0.0027433452,0.006814551,0.0012984236,0.0018733962,0.009441341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0773572,0.0003958426,0.0004724291,0.004346571,0.010753895,0.0050972397,0.0029945155,0.0027066732,0.0005871108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020127163,0.00022186442,0.4404549,0.00016721193,0.00009102207,0.00046419463,0.009612225,0.0020269388,0.0004539086,0.48972446,0.0023261362,0.05425593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008337432,0.0004099212,0.7293375,0.0006728811,0.00008827735,0.004275361,0.02497827,0.012926712,0.0011526342,0.19416195,0.031768817,0.00014428463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046087928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0326244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046087928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064878147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035190715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094940424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044835123","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1117-3","title":"TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND CRIMINALIZATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Relation (database); Acknowledgement; Sociology; Computer security","score_opus":0.010797130379867416,"score_gpt":0.2385564415872736,"score_spread":0.2277593112074062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044835123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3221626,0.006220206,0.022820612,0.013149296,0.00011462563,0.000047404534,0.00010208888,0.000054686057,0.6353285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948776,0.000489786,0.0007066726,0.00018153874,0.000016353328,0.0000125829,0.000013544073,0.0000066594935,0.0036952372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953159,0.0023056278,0.00015472264,0.0006459387,0.00064196537,0.00093573384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746644,0.0008774724,0.0004196751,0.00039331883,0.0004977662,0.0003453599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024098724,0.00016500674,0.00037328995,0.0013644699,0.004434455,0.0047664805,0.0006758126,0.0011681346,0.0036433102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043662465,0.00019368794,0.00030015042,0.0015809799,0.051152855,0.003905024,0.0063549834,0.001674566,0.00020804968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021309372,0.0000014722879,0.00058247056,0.0000076103643,0.0000018634571,0.000025370426,0.0036270374,0.00013835233,0.00003414693,0.99353975,0.00026153,0.0017782954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014873164,0.00003394781,0.0106676975,0.0001720717,0.00002031405,0.00035104668,0.016251583,0.0012170281,0.00026750859,0.8726461,0.098330304,0.000027518845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03475576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0320064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03475576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007751212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063338927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06910694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045111124","doi":"10.1515/9780748697755-007","title":"3 Trust and Patrimony","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Express trust; Trust law; Blind trust; Appropriation; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Institution; Political science; Property rights; Common law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.021831177104682863,"score_gpt":0.24343889200057228,"score_spread":0.22160771489588943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045111124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044277094,0.012735952,0.028958976,0.07262245,0.000531439,0.000052632637,0.00008720005,0.00007197425,0.84066236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443898,0.0022315595,0.0021024728,0.003807306,0.00041001843,0.00004319156,0.000021899212,0.000035777568,0.04695792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943105,0.002405045,0.0002194312,0.0008042765,0.0011653197,0.001095531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961205,0.0017853247,0.00045641148,0.0005791136,0.0006749823,0.0003835752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041831993,0.00039113202,0.0004954958,0.0012372319,0.007287536,0.008705753,0.0009316875,0.0055121514,0.0060297744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007552175,0.00028178867,0.0007964909,0.0010984867,0.0350694,0.0071632327,0.005085074,0.0044771913,0.0008997318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024182434,0.000002042104,0.000072995696,0.000007104651,0.0000015331527,0.00005203501,0.0007213323,0.0000615063,0.0000141071505,0.9971757,0.0010233131,0.0008658135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010076545,0.000014007894,0.00025534414,0.00009111769,0.0000063357597,0.00012763051,0.000832953,0.000560675,0.000108603155,0.9293496,0.06863144,0.000012229256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02393608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011473437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02393608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012841641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005191811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09317309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046063052","doi":"10.7202/042251ar","title":"La Cour suprême, la fiducie d'investissement et le prospectus","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Prospectus; Damages; Supreme court; Law; Investment (military); Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.01067284982418912,"score_gpt":0.28525732206234383,"score_spread":0.2745844722381547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046063052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05371824,0.01386222,0.009123658,0.13967976,0.00087611965,0.00008570237,0.00033263362,0.00012399135,0.7821978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83881044,0.002251695,0.0021062617,0.008939804,0.0002394994,0.000057282577,0.000041715273,0.000033350807,0.14751999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618345,0.00073082605,0.000092756425,0.00039122102,0.0013486968,0.0012530277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971403,0.0013109278,0.00017406791,0.00016852088,0.0008742011,0.0003320898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036029217,0.0004791611,0.00051637535,0.0011065786,0.010107458,0.010484494,0.0015435714,0.008440102,0.0069787125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072694505,0.0003969341,0.00053732784,0.0011758473,0.0157914,0.0022417712,0.0017450459,0.0062667867,0.00048151086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013858762,0.0000047669314,0.00043060153,0.00001399981,0.000005154626,0.00016630522,0.00077855395,0.0002669781,0.00008636438,0.9838256,0.0112190815,0.0031886692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007945247,0.000051942865,0.0055469642,0.00038378462,0.000054423977,0.000277278,0.00272445,0.0027338108,0.00085009664,0.39008674,0.5970908,0.00012034699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8660732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9085216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8660732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04328269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04327307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31403935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046468978","doi":"10.7202/043631ar","title":"Les avantages du règlement consensuel en matière de réparation du préjudice corporel : le cas particulier de la transaction à paiements différés","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012162483719623663,"score_gpt":0.2835242516697323,"score_spread":0.27136176795010863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046468978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76782537,0.0019627356,0.0047831335,0.00899154,0.00015798955,0.00005222917,0.00004555917,0.000023726643,0.2161577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713975,0.0006035355,0.0008663566,0.0005812121,0.0000553362,0.000027668772,0.000013119956,0.00001465528,0.026440483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690104,0.0013363749,0.00009288514,0.00029869188,0.00066763617,0.0007033005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957307,0.0021363455,0.00081350695,0.00036733746,0.0004798677,0.00047228075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031389093,0.0002293363,0.00024046237,0.0008735133,0.006275948,0.0074056704,0.0008826892,0.0026861338,0.011196371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007930056,0.0002463991,0.00035716995,0.0008478708,0.008853542,0.0041636336,0.004603118,0.0030506614,0.00083255296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003153334,0.00016496712,0.048107374,0.00018269653,0.000035331752,0.0037695002,0.18686643,0.00050349446,0.0045027407,0.68998855,0.003950331,0.061613236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057246747,0.00068848097,0.2228647,0.0009657682,0.00011456117,0.0064594047,0.36201862,0.0028514776,0.0073385723,0.14619559,0.25024924,0.00019636897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011020647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018429229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011196371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028262686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026102234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03745562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046575515","doi":"10.7202/042904ar","title":"Le locus standi dans les actions d'intérêt public et la relator action : l'empire de la common law en droit québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Legislature; Common law; Public law; Statutory law; Norm (philosophy); Civil code; Sociology","score_opus":0.018249627994041576,"score_gpt":0.31230903053315245,"score_spread":0.2940594025391109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046575515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12769087,0.02428573,0.036437433,0.08204724,0.00048448532,0.00010460049,0.0002590821,0.00007446059,0.72861606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963041,0.00328664,0.002970101,0.001288382,0.00009189329,0.000037002195,0.00003235111,0.000027371589,0.029225243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450916,0.0026566007,0.00009528112,0.00052133744,0.0010722275,0.0011454497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923631,0.0051091625,0.00052684225,0.0003822955,0.0012103505,0.0004083241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005612487,0.00052018446,0.00090315804,0.0029737374,0.012510201,0.015988022,0.002036081,0.004894564,0.00640827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010004258,0.0004994839,0.00055963866,0.0034438367,0.04239166,0.0053289114,0.0034197369,0.004531999,0.00033143215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004289844,0.000005054007,0.0006165259,0.000015467547,0.0000044446556,0.00010086175,0.0047989287,0.00065204385,0.000022716336,0.9878093,0.0013535373,0.004616768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004408673,0.00003408309,0.0120137,0.0008829157,0.000050324434,0.00029006536,0.02665217,0.006363608,0.00029083985,0.65631884,0.2969402,0.00011924085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9159243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.916863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08407569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07719087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052613202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5600616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050838610","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0031","title":"Is Formalism inevitable?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Scholarship; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.017879355690791746,"score_gpt":0.27723399539297183,"score_spread":0.2593546397021801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050838610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014381904,0.057277534,0.055698518,0.414234,0.0055202446,0.00005555081,0.00025650425,0.00030472458,0.45227107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8590796,0.03173366,0.017115857,0.035700187,0.0053144954,0.00025695088,0.00035205396,0.0003876625,0.050059594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908948,0.0052949036,0.00032102413,0.001202434,0.0015305707,0.00075630884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896248,0.0067074127,0.00050552236,0.0014334065,0.0011148859,0.0006140876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012310483,0.00057862094,0.0008456817,0.0014377355,0.0066619697,0.011502124,0.0016323242,0.003512343,0.00673193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018383887,0.0005675623,0.0008372579,0.0012738821,0.045912277,0.025009913,0.006771861,0.008823277,0.0016708506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035513604,0.0000037354591,0.000045343753,0.000019628613,0.0000018447932,0.000020301408,0.00065981445,0.000062634565,0.00001373877,0.9922036,0.0046622762,0.0023034608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037046964,0.0000029379207,0.000047785838,0.00007496604,0.0000016328569,0.0000279839,0.0004193794,0.00017876326,0.000024826906,0.9557967,0.043416034,0.0000052097325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074269627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039111846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012310483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007653102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007049325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0651049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20517275","doi":"10.29173/alr98","title":"Personal Responsibility for Intentional Conduct: Protecting the Interests of Innocent Co-Insureds Under Insurance Contracts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Statutory law; Damages; Insurance policy; Business; Property insurance; False Claims Act; Law and economics; Liability insurance; Law; Casualty insurance; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science","score_opus":0.0843924987032427,"score_gpt":0.39410812407939455,"score_spread":0.3097156253761518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20517275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042358052,0.26040378,0.013286377,0.09403352,0.00082393124,0.000112369584,0.000054457698,0.000043090804,0.5888844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7793141,0.14653847,0.0040976005,0.019105854,0.0009273188,0.000094759,0.0000404371,0.000019315197,0.049862146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320203,0.0028608225,0.000234178,0.00036404154,0.0022962398,0.0010426544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425524,0.0035413816,0.0005888789,0.00027172078,0.0009308438,0.00041191824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007092314,0.00024884526,0.00047026778,0.0016811242,0.0033518472,0.004908318,0.0013560181,0.0061196596,0.0020139492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009085458,0.00028761866,0.0003310472,0.0016990831,0.012393125,0.0025575624,0.002377057,0.0040414813,0.00040835247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009098586,0.000036394307,0.0009707209,0.00020621868,0.000013728959,0.00022275514,0.0035738866,0.00066751253,0.00015539903,0.9450218,0.0095552355,0.039567262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037344336,0.000101503516,0.009967117,0.0029596114,0.00008798843,0.00056791544,0.004546292,0.00091662275,0.00047607714,0.54628116,0.43399203,0.00006637106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15297864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23187098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15297864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010485919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032906506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30417645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053532955","doi":"10.7202/1019044ar","title":"Unauthorized Dispositions of Trust Property: Tracing in Quebec Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Trust law; Property law; Subrogation; Express trust; Private law; Constructive trust; Common law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Property rights; Sociology; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025638017804686802,"score_gpt":0.29157039951367225,"score_spread":0.2659323817089855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053532955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19434376,0.0021749237,0.017832698,0.02157147,0.0001412384,0.00013641335,0.0003588342,0.0002511695,0.76318955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91661894,0.00082692056,0.0025058712,0.0020863968,0.00001903366,0.000030480573,0.00007122545,0.000051854342,0.07778933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976376,0.00052062713,0.000078777724,0.00029069488,0.0006641456,0.0008082941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99350363,0.0032259766,0.00041882385,0.0009064307,0.001584931,0.0003602925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026755307,0.0001957917,0.00021431787,0.0016688324,0.011056054,0.008644374,0.0015559174,0.0040226616,0.009499791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009562112,0.00045050104,0.00045569628,0.0020030024,0.011026293,0.005695669,0.0032433278,0.005067169,0.00041765784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014137671,0.000018160854,0.0071871215,0.000025894766,0.0000067647493,0.000612828,0.014628333,0.00072671997,0.000189064,0.9509476,0.008288436,0.01735496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030879328,0.00006324147,0.03364937,0.00077844475,0.00009819347,0.0011323453,0.027453426,0.014957734,0.0018042864,0.27514997,0.6446913,0.00019077174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96736175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06605657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06605657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044546746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47927624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053753315","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000170","title":"CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE JUSTICE, AND DISGORGEMENT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Economic Justice; Damages; Prima facie; Law and economics; Business; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Exclusion clause; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.012048273427274997,"score_gpt":0.30707082934914604,"score_spread":0.29502255592187104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053753315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06463716,0.004956492,0.22962694,0.101342045,0.001562116,0.00033797565,0.000081672144,0.0002836796,0.59717196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586415,0.0010076119,0.016735313,0.0048899287,0.00066869694,0.0002524672,0.00002991951,0.00008190971,0.017692795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9560466,0.0160474,0.0026897488,0.005750259,0.013433588,0.006032332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697971,0.012526232,0.005013052,0.007208603,0.0036950922,0.0017600094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031570848,0.000913851,0.0014461137,0.0023067817,0.009106776,0.010745852,0.0041158414,0.0160182,0.0063084913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0545805,0.00051393325,0.0012818512,0.0018319051,0.07135622,0.016922574,0.011561413,0.016256005,0.0006422324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040491736,0.000009412788,0.00008535535,0.00001241473,0.0000035788705,0.00003968041,0.00037737988,0.00023008589,0.000048705955,0.9971186,0.0003997693,0.0016709839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012722351,0.000028077437,0.00022710311,0.00008122531,0.000007862202,0.00010946616,0.00048224587,0.00083591003,0.0001584001,0.98468417,0.013349393,0.000023462957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050719795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037743268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031570848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00817247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013279429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16696459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053920447","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqt015","title":"Insurance between Neighbours: Stannard v Gore and Common Law Liability for Fire","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Liability insurance; Law; Appeal; Statute; Strict liability; Insurance law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Insurance policy; Business; Political science; General insurance","score_opus":0.01727628533201254,"score_gpt":0.28269560693017864,"score_spread":0.2654193215981661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053920447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45122945,0.006176483,0.007241968,0.08939526,0.00033244953,0.00006655325,0.00008192305,0.00004425482,0.44543168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98828447,0.0003636189,0.00048443346,0.0046210224,0.00006031963,0.00001530106,0.00000897889,0.000006243486,0.0061556017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645644,0.0012057144,0.00013844007,0.0005537664,0.0007913605,0.0008542554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997015,0.0018507318,0.00032378102,0.0002704332,0.00021009403,0.00033000368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036097635,0.00014450216,0.00042171415,0.00075040053,0.004467924,0.0044068275,0.0013294176,0.009294518,0.0020618788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009971234,0.000305126,0.0005477742,0.0005010219,0.018811427,0.003896314,0.0044495645,0.005513641,0.0002305663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016761413,0.000011151313,0.0015267651,0.000013214757,0.00000581413,0.0007375392,0.005546203,0.0002234491,0.000084726984,0.9871612,0.0024440242,0.0022291483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012319535,0.00014229794,0.01764448,0.00066007755,0.00008871473,0.003207258,0.019239604,0.004122716,0.0009969468,0.8093926,0.14420177,0.00018032595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07971767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10368278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07971767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044000275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004506279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15850729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055039348","doi":"10.1002/iir.123","title":"Ethics and conflicts, the role of insolvency professionals in the integrity of the Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency system","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Restructuring; Business; Statutory law; Legislature; Accountability; Accounting; Debt; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.061245592664692594,"score_gpt":0.3857068078766909,"score_spread":0.32446121521199833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055039348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0984596,0.059519906,0.0077729584,0.29135025,0.0007007166,0.00013663659,0.00006556939,0.00003801501,0.5419563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952417,0.011854902,0.0019594007,0.006397988,0.0002335415,0.000034319033,0.000014934479,0.0000120474115,0.027075987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820557,0.007718983,0.00046649037,0.000542212,0.006394905,0.002821636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801963,0.008364424,0.0021982167,0.00046187316,0.006411929,0.0023671642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012973152,0.00028977572,0.0003891063,0.0029291972,0.016365822,0.013957712,0.001386821,0.0037264198,0.0036492397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027817693,0.00032567699,0.00021695862,0.0025747346,0.034544233,0.0031866357,0.003476504,0.003500894,0.00023255574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010053296,0.000014031209,0.0025838339,0.000113831295,0.0000079495285,0.00033494693,0.026141804,0.0005855863,0.0001315973,0.9208816,0.017104128,0.03209062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021730631,0.0000367411,0.0226182,0.0014437037,0.000042102314,0.0004972714,0.057497274,0.0018843297,0.00044577903,0.41628942,0.49912944,0.000094052375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79694957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8388808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20305043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07053318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12399886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5117564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056925861","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2014.43.1.0262","title":"Necessity: Duress of Circumstances or Moral Involuntariness?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Element (criminal law); Law; Supreme court; Welsh; Courage; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.064879815500039,"score_gpt":0.3696249763636343,"score_spread":0.30474516086359527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056925861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25438476,0.084759824,0.05115175,0.21405745,0.0033146753,0.00018850956,0.00026459992,0.000098503515,0.39178002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985213,0.004231847,0.002050185,0.0041666296,0.00054871,0.000037760492,0.00002817338,0.000010857362,0.0037128606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481356,0.0022896435,0.00043861003,0.00055209984,0.0012361864,0.0006698102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864137,0.007506121,0.0023298995,0.0013041095,0.0015256207,0.00092057517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009093154,0.0002446528,0.00070219586,0.0013648395,0.0017833012,0.00433003,0.0011159765,0.0032923503,0.0018321484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027060933,0.00023499707,0.00047996885,0.0008894162,0.03431818,0.009668304,0.0026152013,0.004588039,0.00022357747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025673273,0.000009202912,0.0017080685,0.00015402847,0.000012795257,0.0001707286,0.0047822963,0.0000785277,0.00024004829,0.97872305,0.001738677,0.012356922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024657409,0.00011437301,0.014324768,0.0011099915,0.000037270194,0.0010123842,0.008775821,0.00042824828,0.0003454902,0.9007514,0.07298788,0.000087652355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088048475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013710155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009093154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039150524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053036506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048089743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057396850","doi":"","title":"Calling Antony Duff to Account Rowan Cruft, Mathew H. Kramer, Mark R. Reiff (eds): Crime, Punishment and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rowan; Punishment (psychology); Jurisprudence; Criminology; Theology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.023110083916869216,"score_gpt":0.29382935112183695,"score_spread":0.27071926720496775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057396850","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004264691,0.70219296,0.001799086,0.23970176,0.014387731,0.00001042134,0.0000473536,0.00002963211,0.041404616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023111722,0.7051636,0.0040657776,0.11788112,0.03115248,0.00010847504,0.0001162384,0.00018356951,0.11821712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978236,0.0005659077,0.00007964565,0.00039946006,0.00097081857,0.00016044381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626344,0.0025123935,0.00030585803,0.00009859023,0.00062443333,0.00019533774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019480231,0.0008138058,0.0010267132,0.0018085351,0.0025959008,0.0056790314,0.0015539082,0.0052482807,0.009901709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059468285,0.0005339938,0.00044406383,0.0024503132,0.0063280547,0.012006162,0.0025362752,0.009108906,0.0043933126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015949101,0.0000134135935,0.0001991898,0.0004657758,0.0000101466385,0.000118337484,0.0015011206,0.00010071898,0.00008189387,0.15860735,0.7734334,0.06545282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000340452,0.0000042065235,0.00015511875,0.00045563464,0.0000030772412,0.000113570124,0.00026276926,0.000034361616,0.000037461352,0.01826057,0.9806637,0.0000061275045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018815044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030808615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018815044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004091113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062837387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037411034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057708753","doi":"10.7202/045085ar","title":"Responsibility for Another’s Debt: Suretyship, Solidarity, and Imperfect Delegation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Debtor; Analogy; Obligation; Creditor; Law and economics; Debt; Law; Joint and several liability; Delegation; Political science; Imperfect; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Liability; Philosophy; Strict liability; Epistemology; Finance","score_opus":0.031050345143335326,"score_gpt":0.33483015941588545,"score_spread":0.30377981427255013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057708753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15052366,0.002571278,0.03971157,0.07855078,0.00028273364,0.000117590556,0.00009213501,0.00009472278,0.7280555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96104807,0.0003641055,0.0020667964,0.0041221003,0.00012677233,0.000056206136,0.000015739177,0.000020942914,0.032179132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925795,0.0024862688,0.00029721955,0.00088747585,0.0017995441,0.0019498968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939296,0.002339783,0.0007642982,0.0011506123,0.000946713,0.0008689763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006672363,0.00027929427,0.000445343,0.0007429258,0.008707231,0.008645866,0.0020424577,0.0058857957,0.0028338146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011341722,0.00048103143,0.00051450916,0.00087826245,0.037539784,0.0065276125,0.006805871,0.007098276,0.0003014449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021051617,0.000006088967,0.0002390631,0.000003875716,0.0000013181533,0.00006770489,0.0010197636,0.00018294204,0.000020233496,0.9963116,0.0011077529,0.0010376048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001978926,0.000019190693,0.0026863161,0.000102103855,0.0000073838405,0.00014435333,0.0016880773,0.0016070693,0.00014622913,0.954142,0.03940854,0.000028918417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14388123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14548035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14388123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01720122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019347465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2860875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057982004","doi":"10.7202/203247ar","title":"Les définitions aristotéliciennes de la justice : leurs rapports à la notion d’égalité","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.36162639363872434,"score_gpt":0.4560137748673759,"score_spread":0.09438738122865153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057982004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03770213,0.030638274,0.15137655,0.025992248,0.001641833,0.000052433938,0.00011383512,0.00008336071,0.7523993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90726876,0.0117669115,0.0283384,0.0038247025,0.0011485099,0.00017260168,0.00007011784,0.00013818477,0.047271807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99292034,0.0039971448,0.00025242483,0.0006092365,0.001751381,0.00046942793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758196,0.0013595963,0.00022522053,0.0003079768,0.00040623755,0.00011897707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004170201,0.00064941746,0.0008506257,0.0026189997,0.007032057,0.009853717,0.0011790122,0.003349632,0.003923045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061197034,0.00032434525,0.0006506847,0.002546828,0.035749376,0.009612438,0.0048616165,0.007291625,0.000675425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024489452,0.0000014084047,0.000029443407,0.000008254738,0.0000010782447,0.000007021162,0.0013638958,0.00002581859,0.000021843953,0.9969892,0.00028906364,0.0012605905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004558401,0.000009466138,0.0003103453,0.00008024799,0.0000038223684,0.000053689455,0.0017670282,0.00016053602,0.0001668217,0.93373924,0.063692056,0.000012233819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077849003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010063236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009853717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075543085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036087602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054810584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058511668","doi":"10.1093/tandt/tts003","title":"Trusts in partibus infidelium","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04164470292564483,"score_gpt":0.37467503634307214,"score_spread":0.3330303334174273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058511668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012897055,0.017996013,0.0022568742,0.29137942,0.049951028,0.000085148204,0.00050141447,0.00047521706,0.6244578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14776178,0.003911507,0.00046388604,0.06740147,0.0071024257,0.000040312247,0.00016526428,0.00047715864,0.7726762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946484,0.0010290446,0.0003270433,0.00061303546,0.0016641647,0.0017184013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944002,0.0012745507,0.0004806626,0.0005434008,0.0014805719,0.0018205874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029600188,0.00032868798,0.0003036463,0.00050560787,0.008262407,0.0065006344,0.0006161031,0.0061938236,0.05334593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013121457,0.00063829165,0.0003578574,0.0006280943,0.0034034406,0.0044163084,0.003933742,0.0074466313,0.012623992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002330403,0.000012376111,0.00047561646,0.000070383285,0.000005276069,0.00040604462,0.0022757617,0.00004042998,0.0001484749,0.100519106,0.8814298,0.014593364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002327652,0.000007939079,0.00037179602,0.000068847534,0.000002565631,0.00010680801,0.0006225643,0.000039760984,0.000078874116,0.0025924575,0.9960978,0.000008252392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06961733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121624656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06961733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009978548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010411355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17845994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058696629","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v1n4p81","title":"A Comparison of Two Legal Models of Social Governance in China: Public Law and Private Law----Appeal for Reforming Chinese Legal System","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Appeal; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Chinese law; Corporate governance; Administrative law; Political science; Municipal law; Business","score_opus":0.03860459826700246,"score_gpt":0.3474071610248997,"score_spread":0.30880256275789725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058696629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.782684,0.0012297778,0.024271473,0.021412397,0.00011967282,0.0004478413,0.000094974464,0.000078901816,0.16966087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965509,0.00019119645,0.0013468513,0.00020028104,0.000015398453,0.000073198404,0.000017861785,0.0000035973142,0.0016005913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960461,0.0017663724,0.00013673642,0.00035565172,0.0011194126,0.0005756162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978235,0.0007166289,0.0004497883,0.00023900313,0.00047499797,0.0002962405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042254156,0.00020910766,0.00026865976,0.0024992893,0.0029257203,0.004485396,0.0008934734,0.00096154446,0.0026229625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052600238,0.0001826466,0.00041189734,0.0016274003,0.008523004,0.0042132265,0.0023728576,0.0006843142,0.00008654693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013800394,0.00004960243,0.021048183,0.000056439603,0.000013870483,0.00019059506,0.005755028,0.0012399763,0.00024918097,0.9535169,0.0014142308,0.016452203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023620306,0.00030254686,0.22247857,0.00046203728,0.00016784339,0.00036628812,0.04209246,0.06967768,0.001422785,0.58916956,0.07351533,0.00010876179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03303994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04324101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03303994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015755786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016156057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11431676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059557261","doi":"10.7202/1026945ar","title":"La capacité de tester : tenants et aboutissants","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.021916160095592368,"score_gpt":0.28953770879785296,"score_spread":0.26762154870226057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059557261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24317785,0.004605872,0.016084583,0.05643877,0.0006659554,0.00022560252,0.00024653185,0.00027388052,0.67828095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87712854,0.001264021,0.0017498356,0.0029279983,0.000070123904,0.00006881771,0.00007845862,0.00012097204,0.11659131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98843575,0.0044265483,0.00018584458,0.0007782366,0.0043514506,0.0018221901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981808,0.007568355,0.00074941624,0.0009861479,0.0059176777,0.0029703795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008768269,0.0006826148,0.00037935382,0.0019486434,0.010532226,0.01281153,0.0018999017,0.0025862136,0.011586124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020045338,0.00039797457,0.0002751705,0.0019941402,0.02432444,0.005426717,0.0032692915,0.0042683943,0.0014149596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010063261,0.00008850048,0.015522745,0.00013892639,0.000014766942,0.0010323734,0.296626,0.0005171685,0.0014534688,0.58368146,0.034295846,0.0665281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026569236,0.00012905964,0.017076284,0.0007379457,0.0000351757,0.0007195922,0.27191842,0.002066487,0.0019376542,0.06254854,0.64265233,0.00015199315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51529056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5482025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51529056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030141816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035349924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.975128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059942797","doi":"10.1002/iir.190","title":"The composition of the debtor's estate on insolvency: A comparative study of exemptions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Estate; Insolvency; Legislature; Composition (language); Business; Law; Probate; Creditor; Real estate; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Finance; Economics; Debt","score_opus":0.1616857352097863,"score_gpt":0.40704689393370325,"score_spread":0.24536115872391695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059942797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9166965,0.0023119554,0.0007122009,0.0012571784,0.000031529715,0.000049374208,0.00006435424,0.0000032337266,0.07887362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970324,0.0007094254,0.00018791754,0.0001288244,0.000022926119,0.00002012126,0.00005875521,0.0000032690177,0.0018364622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891431,0.00609715,0.0006977669,0.000393058,0.0027396597,0.00092922087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98352724,0.009710152,0.002971883,0.00040875416,0.0025140585,0.0008678793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009767669,0.00013178789,0.0006959905,0.0037410373,0.0022778877,0.0035564073,0.0008431933,0.0006199666,0.005680119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03584271,0.00017829018,0.00026052925,0.003828735,0.0035862904,0.0031588178,0.00343287,0.0010565851,0.00039982266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008710229,0.0004740947,0.308566,0.00093218486,0.00017019021,0.0031954201,0.2608131,0.0010581303,0.0029657804,0.2674562,0.0062162154,0.14728174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005461841,0.0003742375,0.68564236,0.0012634563,0.000080015954,0.0015251418,0.22621351,0.0008158463,0.00087830436,0.020311054,0.0627956,0.00004578648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054781805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095641045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009767669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017922362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017133785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05165696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060105243","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0014","title":"Private Law and Public Right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Canada Council for the Arts","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Slavic languages; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Classics; Law; History; Art history","score_opus":0.02653600188505005,"score_gpt":0.2331907195830554,"score_spread":0.20665471769800536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060105243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024818592,0.005156762,0.000641751,0.038434166,0.00019526455,0.000011390207,0.00036401508,0.000041415457,0.9526734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5567976,0.009106576,0.00073390396,0.01205288,0.0008577011,0.000049455106,0.00040796128,0.00010491105,0.41988903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998323,0.0002851839,0.00003655509,0.00019545709,0.00056840613,0.00059143733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976318,0.000933643,0.00017060248,0.00035091926,0.0004546979,0.00045833885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012241423,0.00024014413,0.00031205692,0.0010413632,0.005933966,0.008867096,0.00069142453,0.0038317132,0.075308494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059133503,0.0002214472,0.00019435097,0.0018509977,0.01282742,0.0062773046,0.0027574636,0.0026362361,0.00577849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017460187,0.000004620327,0.00011239749,0.000012787097,9.426541e-7,0.00002489566,0.00051784876,0.000030278848,0.0000117106,0.9428944,0.052171625,0.0042167935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075456755,0.000004393755,0.001427666,0.00020620096,0.0000039728457,0.00007046587,0.0017735916,0.00016479817,0.00007177794,0.5133659,0.4828959,0.000007770558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22194964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23858157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22194964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015899533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013061371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44131547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060291855","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0013","title":"Ernie's Three Worlds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035658198521737815,"score_gpt":0.24481946985963499,"score_spread":0.20916127133789716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060291855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0086573865,0.0051376494,0.004638347,0.09017996,0.0015282353,0.00002397959,0.00007779924,0.00006577075,0.8896909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51395327,0.004914103,0.005577244,0.035937224,0.0006341541,0.00012692541,0.00009774272,0.00017064088,0.43858868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964169,0.0011334623,0.000076979566,0.0006491368,0.0008739794,0.0008495363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815494,0.0005603227,0.00009354305,0.00030649017,0.00026548555,0.00061924465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034292762,0.00055074156,0.00049263856,0.0013404046,0.014381106,0.013548779,0.0009493058,0.003933591,0.015661906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053438237,0.00042080562,0.00045217574,0.0007825046,0.023348046,0.011381051,0.011665005,0.007342524,0.002203001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006060949,0.000006894132,0.00014360504,0.0000070134993,0.0000012996071,0.000055768363,0.0053024124,0.000025611242,0.000021563683,0.9595169,0.02993667,0.0049762577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048868687,0.0000083435325,0.00032505064,0.00012552181,0.0000029499017,0.00016117936,0.008787192,0.00012324365,0.00009827884,0.28319237,0.7071568,0.000014073974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03192009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059030607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03192009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009790192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071105273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07103318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061219859","doi":"10.14722/ndss.2015.23258","title":"Gracewipe: Secure and Verifiable Deletion under Coercion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Verifiable secret sharing; Coercion (linguistics); Computer science; Computer security; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07722505167905437,"score_gpt":0.35174377412163055,"score_spread":0.2745187224425762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061219859","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030351488,0.0018386351,0.814496,0.00565387,0.0018525519,0.0009098437,0.0032106482,0.07785513,0.06383181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70980084,0.0019781147,0.18485115,0.0027156,0.0012161408,0.0013587062,0.004290498,0.006502227,0.08728677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297416,0.0012693561,0.0005123601,0.0011576223,0.002975092,0.0011114908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98439807,0.005625057,0.0008139062,0.006996048,0.0016398357,0.0005270959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004560125,0.0012233088,0.0016247428,0.0012005229,0.0024812769,0.0042749355,0.0042634867,0.002300004,0.022300985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020945977,0.0011054318,0.0010570135,0.0014341336,0.005671581,0.0114066005,0.011337979,0.004910431,0.012744834],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002739651,0.00023736636,0.0022977556,0.0007139456,0.00011502153,0.0012598068,0.0013459075,0.014204622,0.018807102,0.5241625,0.16052875,0.27358752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007394659,0.00034016077,0.0007410405,0.0003761669,0.00017494718,0.0018275297,0.00042153735,0.15466309,0.089364275,0.51265395,0.23830198,0.00039589382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022023993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019406241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022300985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011590928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046256306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07460421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061805555","doi":"10.7202/045699ar","title":"From Norms to Facts: The Realization of Rights in Common and Civil Private Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal culture; Private law; Legal realism; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Empirical legal studies; Legal profession; Normative; Philosophy of law; Legal history; Ideal (ethics); Comparative law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04192305796101551,"score_gpt":0.29518315741207485,"score_spread":0.2532600994510593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061805555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037112582,0.008240807,0.07006382,0.10589686,0.00082212145,0.000114292525,0.00014814225,0.00011815357,0.7774832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95646834,0.002546773,0.012690452,0.00436617,0.0006128724,0.00017036356,0.00005884532,0.000078451245,0.02300789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844094,0.008679833,0.00043056684,0.0011750613,0.0038711939,0.001434018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99021614,0.0061603584,0.0006682228,0.0013439858,0.0009815532,0.0006297747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013092528,0.00047495207,0.0005429436,0.0020785104,0.008353393,0.014230589,0.0021893627,0.005229784,0.003326346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018927252,0.00055070006,0.0005675872,0.0016260582,0.10488447,0.020416353,0.007577012,0.00712528,0.0005447673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014361758,0.0000021936355,0.000030270423,0.0000047038234,6.0029254e-7,0.000014048515,0.001830699,0.00005605479,0.00001326522,0.99641955,0.00058561645,0.0010416828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049623186,0.000005010481,0.000111997324,0.000045106415,0.000001585948,0.00001713809,0.0011549516,0.00017151442,0.000047952148,0.9777931,0.020640144,0.00000663193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033432666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0257085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033432666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011909179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01428981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08640748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062435447","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01784.x","title":"ANALYSING CONTRACTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: LESSONS FROM INDIGENOUS HEALTH IN CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Positive Living North; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Business; Perspective (graphical); Conceptual framework; Strengths and weaknesses; Public relations; Public economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06613390136467633,"score_gpt":0.35489292659155425,"score_spread":0.2887590252268779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062435447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048446,0.0027093813,0.0038543711,0.006989579,0.00003131111,0.00026762293,0.00015449335,0.000020543337,0.08112821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99180096,0.0013750264,0.002561027,0.00023741428,0.000009895064,0.000078730875,0.00006576894,0.000016535183,0.0038546214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99352163,0.0027589398,0.00019225139,0.00037231695,0.0014794527,0.0016754759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98877406,0.006556722,0.0011110358,0.00042031324,0.0020594979,0.001078414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007975396,0.00038752987,0.0006162992,0.0026114513,0.017161388,0.006576316,0.002430241,0.0013343025,0.003360987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019072102,0.000394269,0.00039323748,0.0070606624,0.017505711,0.004097934,0.005239602,0.0023076653,0.00011976953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052963707,0.00011433191,0.04205206,0.00021722946,0.000032206382,0.0016732818,0.7531856,0.0015102936,0.00020451592,0.16527563,0.0021171032,0.03356488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025418907,0.000047366193,0.103942454,0.000408594,0.00004067252,0.00025616083,0.8248477,0.0038516528,0.0001637976,0.021946097,0.04440989,0.000060252594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9879446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09743371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09743371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08367603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70693433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062851214","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00638.x","title":"The Political Origins of English Private Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Legitimacy; Politics; Public law; Law; Political science; Rationality; Political law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Sociology; Law and economics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.017862832459416722,"score_gpt":0.3017493670954498,"score_spread":0.2838865346360331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062851214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11015704,0.004128796,0.022365926,0.051919024,0.00034877023,0.00004597004,0.00012472225,0.00004358603,0.8108661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661016,0.0009215637,0.001491429,0.0018038559,0.0002486563,0.000039091618,0.000031025098,0.00003507149,0.029327692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619895,0.0016114782,0.00013017649,0.0005222536,0.00087652577,0.00066057907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505424,0.0030532863,0.0004328435,0.00043839408,0.0007331826,0.00028801523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037315323,0.00019423685,0.00037507067,0.0014728473,0.005934472,0.009172282,0.00063049304,0.0021172927,0.005702786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007701034,0.0003869038,0.00028281467,0.0010002257,0.020476209,0.0071926913,0.0037129545,0.0043207146,0.0006643609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022642275,0.000002660224,0.00006591661,0.0000051756083,4.158105e-7,0.000032133277,0.0026817792,0.000022021679,0.000038361904,0.9958325,0.00040761015,0.0009092246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002030918,0.000016223314,0.0015623063,0.000106654,0.0000070810092,0.00012516294,0.0042594485,0.00084189494,0.00039222479,0.8221895,0.17046346,0.000015738879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010585436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008609201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010585436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084424885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003106986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06125486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064701930","doi":"10.7202/050456ar","title":"The Exclusive Remedy Provision in Canadian Worker Compensation Law: The Need for Legislative Reform","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Statutory law; Legislature; Compensation (psychology); Workers' compensation; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Constitution; Psychology","score_opus":0.034895431753824674,"score_gpt":0.312679048326955,"score_spread":0.27778361657313033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064701930","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04583462,0.020983137,0.011284118,0.63267905,0.0037685104,0.00034844282,0.00031946745,0.0002989507,0.2844836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6995799,0.016999623,0.019632686,0.1712617,0.0025002062,0.00024031491,0.00027654986,0.00011677884,0.08939218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9740146,0.0030146479,0.0010307877,0.00200721,0.013484423,0.006448294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684332,0.012460895,0.0012646168,0.0016299115,0.013870714,0.0023406139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025176004,0.00048298918,0.0010834824,0.0037981055,0.017988367,0.014746672,0.0059082676,0.010729968,0.0059381127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050164927,0.0007138692,0.0011887737,0.003875739,0.02190981,0.007431422,0.004312378,0.012611974,0.0004821934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025079724,0.000034644527,0.0009094222,0.00017781262,0.000013676465,0.00015824473,0.0032079918,0.0011709664,0.0005024148,0.93298095,0.023467686,0.03735109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017180557,0.00010639924,0.017014068,0.0016570785,0.00015064314,0.00025697847,0.009905636,0.0036716806,0.0011750021,0.20125723,0.7642762,0.00035725423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95957255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1131574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1131574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3181351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8210182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064977114","doi":"10.7202/1009444ar","title":"La Loi sur le transfert des valeurs mobilières et l’obtention des titres intermédiés ou les excès d’un régime d’exception en matière de sûretés mobilières","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025420367069378086,"score_gpt":0.285478167782644,"score_spread":0.2600578007132659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064977114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25848338,0.0020086137,0.024599036,0.014904112,0.00030901126,0.00012582207,0.00029837646,0.0001592867,0.6991123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77389246,0.0009616653,0.004195637,0.0013618881,0.0000949436,0.0000943674,0.00010798505,0.00009299337,0.21919805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711466,0.0005608863,0.000087689354,0.00044109716,0.0012100444,0.00058562274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965922,0.0007899048,0.0005238168,0.00045852503,0.0011694048,0.0004661319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027122612,0.0003888662,0.00027014903,0.0011429214,0.00507171,0.0060230703,0.001003424,0.0016247784,0.018348143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060043666,0.00033763275,0.0003771186,0.0009827731,0.009165993,0.002735395,0.0029253603,0.003314306,0.0015872847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008902558,0.00004364948,0.012720709,0.00016798815,0.000038920964,0.00033602517,0.020732448,0.0011856821,0.0045352043,0.9015991,0.0054713613,0.053079892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058524114,0.0002906939,0.16113527,0.001197408,0.00009548376,0.00054594816,0.029700296,0.002804239,0.0064138947,0.13198999,0.6655653,0.00020293066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2322328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3717366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2322328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013458852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016360428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46176213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066384412","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0149.2008.456_21.x","title":"<i>Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?</i> ‐ By Christopher Heath Wellman and A. John Simmons","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Books","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Citation; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.047088532565750955,"score_gpt":0.2997351343931501,"score_spread":0.2526466018273991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066384412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008198995,0.046774313,0.0012456839,0.8187296,0.026833523,0.000015856755,0.00006786062,0.000043739918,0.105469555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051010516,0.06485375,0.0022185766,0.39240038,0.023994468,0.000068822155,0.00011831291,0.00020960739,0.46512553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831796,0.0006002705,0.000073122814,0.00028748027,0.0005631237,0.00015804096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969639,0.0016314504,0.00024660738,0.00015758853,0.00061374577,0.00038667818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029379213,0.0006706691,0.0005181121,0.0006630196,0.0039640153,0.0055458103,0.0008825938,0.0044934093,0.011030282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008663757,0.00041043537,0.0004815985,0.00064957375,0.010678897,0.009213687,0.0022351174,0.013016207,0.00598626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007911668,0.000009116944,0.00012938854,0.000053124,0.0000045155048,0.00003271333,0.0018004797,0.00003596617,0.000083686406,0.10833949,0.8764961,0.013007546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025445647,0.0000060308794,0.00026545956,0.00026832704,0.0000024973124,0.00007475544,0.001647414,0.000058740214,0.00006698543,0.030007299,0.96758926,0.000010824765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014769399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02485026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014769399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031816503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004320996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036899984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066571852","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1099-1107(200021)9:1<5::aid-iir60>3.0.co;2-p","title":"Transactional avoidance: critical aspects of English and Australian law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Transactional leadership; Law; Law library; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.03481918342887257,"score_gpt":0.37597466136485985,"score_spread":0.3411554779359873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066571852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06259124,0.15964688,0.010425474,0.3828604,0.0043775258,0.00012629578,0.00010140055,0.00003673339,0.37983412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8577606,0.041114707,0.0028495365,0.05266924,0.006741904,0.0002883797,0.000050094888,0.00006246562,0.038463045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884327,0.0058468664,0.0005792655,0.00066225714,0.0032055662,0.0012733205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509647,0.03916086,0.0018449078,0.0011507751,0.0057953587,0.0010834034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019041616,0.00031434445,0.00080875534,0.0055151423,0.0064533465,0.014072582,0.0021230653,0.008205863,0.0034272678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05430954,0.00038425162,0.0004657728,0.0044370773,0.024260148,0.011983321,0.0034393945,0.008431447,0.00027152352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000113692395,0.000021242522,0.00035132354,0.00015855348,0.000007884185,0.00012132383,0.009931804,0.00009519484,0.000048447982,0.96359897,0.013218153,0.012435651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014317509,0.000054575008,0.0068822852,0.0020576268,0.00004225426,0.00023867116,0.012873857,0.0007112112,0.00014879502,0.71586746,0.26105955,0.000049314945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03592175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047139425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03592175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008003835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011637084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10070288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066855800","doi":"10.1002/iir.122","title":"Forgiving our debtors: a Scottish perspective on a fresh start for debtors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Bankruptcy; Debt; Fresh Start; Perspective (graphical); Balance (ability); Business; Enforcement; Law and economics; Insolvency; Law; Receivership; Creditor; Economics; Political science; Finance; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.059815576180962574,"score_gpt":0.4162219718174838,"score_spread":0.35640639563652127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066855800","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06111065,0.031526662,0.0038657777,0.59229183,0.0016813822,0.0000481068,0.000045179786,0.00003574053,0.3093947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923106,0.011527582,0.0008774244,0.03982303,0.0011267061,0.00002552619,0.00001482938,0.000014692943,0.023484163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99159056,0.0044508604,0.00023690303,0.00033503538,0.0013601524,0.002026514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916855,0.0033722364,0.0008821312,0.00027569968,0.0018069942,0.0019775233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122965295,0.0003689317,0.00056268956,0.0018982945,0.011083329,0.015755601,0.0015475206,0.007876446,0.0052285814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012777171,0.00027418032,0.0005628512,0.0014814022,0.027144967,0.0075368015,0.00650467,0.0069405767,0.0004012681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024330178,0.000036840273,0.0010857319,0.00011179508,0.000010755047,0.0010758494,0.028559366,0.00020255503,0.00014516422,0.9244852,0.028278392,0.015983947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039529237,0.00017082518,0.0038697931,0.0009824008,0.000028234463,0.0007023939,0.06808541,0.000431123,0.0002687145,0.26601145,0.65933526,0.00007480828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057998937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097457156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057998937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010127844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013890905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11532265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068515088","doi":"","title":"A Commonwealth of Perspective on Restitutionary Disgorgement for Breach of Contract","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Law; Breach of contract; Scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Damages","score_opus":0.031092571421402693,"score_gpt":0.35275207865930025,"score_spread":0.32165950723789755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068515088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010433779,0.01734861,0.011001754,0.10497617,0.00091786217,0.000033137374,0.0000435701,0.000035773744,0.85520935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75315094,0.021418834,0.0041845604,0.041899912,0.0018344271,0.00021956694,0.000057682388,0.0001254462,0.17710865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98928237,0.0040611094,0.00036714776,0.0013369417,0.0029433863,0.002009177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963678,0.0018337413,0.00026128208,0.00050365354,0.0006124365,0.00042101863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005626097,0.000617048,0.00042713335,0.002561062,0.013779544,0.01618994,0.0020626169,0.011131945,0.007920785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074419067,0.00040936723,0.0007932191,0.0024188925,0.04868855,0.0103984075,0.007808031,0.0109074665,0.00087196246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010481688,0.000004399668,0.00004495448,0.000004668065,6.7293536e-7,0.00002463514,0.0008579628,0.000042610907,0.000017815699,0.99476385,0.0027108968,0.0015265114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008742166,0.0000230559,0.0006105921,0.00043779062,0.000008206335,0.000116283416,0.0038352038,0.00046421835,0.00012609968,0.6298636,0.36448458,0.000021589804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06160202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05754993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06160202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019998582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020137936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14510053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071745665","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0045","title":"Person, place, or thing?: Property and the structuring of social relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Property rights; Intuition; Structuring; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01396040738108468,"score_gpt":0.2380048575908833,"score_spread":0.22404445020979863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071745665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.178613,0.0116263535,0.13601579,0.089939006,0.0003916347,0.000118499454,0.0001866683,0.00019978646,0.5829092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98609805,0.0009902109,0.005943467,0.001100391,0.000102504906,0.00005612072,0.00002628289,0.000022452152,0.0056605157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653095,0.0022480136,0.00010148123,0.0004081517,0.0003692483,0.00034222688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978258,0.0011507547,0.0002876662,0.00035334416,0.00016009204,0.00022234846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036525698,0.00025375132,0.00047813452,0.0012700054,0.00552291,0.007117543,0.0010451474,0.0024077913,0.003173817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039883456,0.00034194053,0.0004402731,0.001443281,0.06664536,0.011967214,0.0052427175,0.0023861807,0.0004585836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003712969,0.0000028409304,0.0001664997,0.000007518795,0.0000016073684,0.000025097906,0.0032059487,0.00010243066,0.0000249464,0.9944429,0.00035558065,0.0016609378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009571071,0.000008022611,0.0005128376,0.000030725667,0.0000024773806,0.000037050428,0.002417433,0.00028787137,0.00005101615,0.9739396,0.022697054,0.00000641413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011142364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00869167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011142364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053268266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037090145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038648963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W207198083","doi":"","title":"Shareholder Primacy Revisited: Does the Public Interest Have Any Role in Statutory Duties?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Shareholder; Corporate law; Enforcement; Business; Public interest; Shareholder primacy; CONTEST; Mandate; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03567579830684491,"score_gpt":0.257657173879542,"score_spread":0.2219813755726971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W207198083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06528691,0.013774785,0.06822911,0.380157,0.0020864473,0.0000740662,0.00008002847,0.0001023323,0.4702093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94515544,0.0032189768,0.005328163,0.026284432,0.0027044762,0.00009649518,0.00002244371,0.00008643366,0.017103203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894749,0.00365865,0.00046902636,0.0017244859,0.0034537609,0.0012192721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824233,0.011204938,0.0015277456,0.0021106899,0.001847603,0.000885743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014176084,0.00060523325,0.0014489369,0.0017450873,0.006681958,0.01251426,0.0030109244,0.013673514,0.004753345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023018453,0.0005907806,0.0012830164,0.0014566386,0.041169677,0.02021729,0.006861932,0.017851414,0.00087665557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030577528,0.0000064563883,0.00008804918,0.000009378352,0.0000020976422,0.00003329963,0.00048070127,0.000036115256,0.000030817544,0.9974027,0.00045260316,0.0014546423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019229254,0.000018820945,0.0003554552,0.000115219285,0.000011838092,0.00008911739,0.00048515954,0.00041720067,0.00020539039,0.9799335,0.018338079,0.000010966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005768095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005035029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014176084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007288077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008375399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0749712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072071869","doi":"10.7202/1000620ar","title":"The Public/Private Distinction in Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Dominion; Discretion; Liberalism; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.07299705351343487,"score_gpt":0.2972038172188597,"score_spread":0.2242067637054248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072071869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04587944,0.0052795587,0.0051256027,0.09904939,0.0010427722,0.00015962025,0.0001792389,0.00009503948,0.8431894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8604165,0.0011760973,0.0012900233,0.052983392,0.00070449745,0.00026444442,0.00007312914,0.000053515483,0.08303852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247336,0.0018100775,0.00026939317,0.0011835838,0.0020800163,0.0021835577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971022,0.0018437657,0.00022003909,0.00021835776,0.00039737983,0.00021826594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056082467,0.0005327965,0.00061065255,0.0011033267,0.013289229,0.00916691,0.0021425213,0.014068633,0.0030126355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008627734,0.0007450347,0.00060572114,0.0010714475,0.017234974,0.00445222,0.003800163,0.014247779,0.00046180788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008323267,0.0000061503106,0.00017628803,0.0000059799268,0.0000017414333,0.0000957798,0.0011802242,0.000034329434,0.00006022091,0.9899942,0.0070641623,0.0013726158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010948392,0.000086275206,0.00419928,0.00033968737,0.00007123249,0.00040364388,0.002064914,0.0012179241,0.0019296176,0.5295853,0.45985118,0.00014142947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18947834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22112662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81052166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018203374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012895908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3767509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072149012","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttq108","title":"First Guernsey case on trusts and mistake: Arun Estate Agencies Limited v Kleinwort Benson (Guernsey) Trustees Limited, Royal Court of Guernsey, 7 April 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Mistake; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02947886790701451,"score_gpt":0.2842056404824199,"score_spread":0.25472677257540544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072149012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22365469,0.01157375,0.0025042275,0.35226732,0.00234535,0.0001707553,0.00048368328,0.0001240718,0.40687615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70778954,0.0024214084,0.0011310319,0.10251119,0.00044069818,0.00011525296,0.0000776561,0.000053838587,0.18545938],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658906,0.0007378733,0.00017033235,0.0003541557,0.0009800744,0.0011684414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99546826,0.0016348975,0.00034499692,0.000258077,0.0010386815,0.00125505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003220988,0.00027823276,0.00048156502,0.00055059744,0.013537249,0.0037260232,0.0013452587,0.012403524,0.0083002765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587932,0.000676407,0.0004409798,0.0006780167,0.0040019066,0.0027901225,0.00462065,0.011823797,0.0010102214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024808827,0.00013063102,0.015939927,0.00015632293,0.00005315623,0.016018562,0.02481693,0.0005073042,0.0008869859,0.27656427,0.64197534,0.022702482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020302707,0.00017703153,0.028321976,0.0010076548,0.00017815798,0.0089365365,0.02505807,0.0016426815,0.0014291176,0.043588914,0.8892245,0.00023228182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33547804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61933184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33547804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009200159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015197874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6670507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072498805","doi":"10.1017/s000819731300038x","title":"CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND THE NO-PROFIT RULE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Business; Law and economics; Profit (economics); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.010481985199346025,"score_gpt":0.2585663839237788,"score_spread":0.24808439872443278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072498805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06617557,0.004015703,0.11493154,0.06186718,0.00091396185,0.00013021335,0.00014853128,0.00011310273,0.7517043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651747,0.000703022,0.005283598,0.0029696159,0.00060764473,0.00012590866,0.000024101557,0.000038291433,0.025073202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873768,0.004871467,0.000618449,0.0020158864,0.0034217555,0.0016956681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97020525,0.019144285,0.0022850167,0.0043565375,0.0029578242,0.001051023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012879616,0.00052208,0.0012757636,0.0010863567,0.004908987,0.009675419,0.0021492376,0.008690282,0.006098019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035966717,0.0006454558,0.0010890005,0.00086545263,0.02701926,0.012483473,0.00445281,0.009400544,0.0011410622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033881356,0.0000038771477,0.00002538048,0.0000046537225,0.0000023552384,0.00001609475,0.00007259549,0.00008158838,0.000014599308,0.9988243,0.00044956923,0.0005016111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066150874,0.000002083414,0.000027821941,0.0000058215987,0.000002101732,0.000013179859,0.000027370781,0.00022362862,0.000025350724,0.99810445,0.0015585426,0.000002888237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032738398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028727138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012879616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048489333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004673455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0681147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075420913","doi":"10.7202/042347ar","title":"La responsabilité civile découlant de l'inaction gouvernementale","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Statutory law; Duty; Political science; Law; Liability; Action (physics); Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.009444771025772564,"score_gpt":0.28549468103139,"score_spread":0.2760499100056174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075420913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055890337,0.007424949,0.019478837,0.049591314,0.0007867209,0.00022769591,0.00029118807,0.00019048453,0.8661185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70030504,0.0045634466,0.009466179,0.007582211,0.00057583896,0.00020405249,0.00014393119,0.000087801054,0.27707145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913539,0.0017644727,0.0003716472,0.00086361635,0.0034339235,0.0022124334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923183,0.0024696842,0.0007759342,0.00080795545,0.0030591781,0.00056907925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069219735,0.00076542096,0.00057299994,0.0021692694,0.0073040985,0.008845089,0.0020967436,0.0075073647,0.01011802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009143746,0.00057765224,0.00089532346,0.0009040818,0.023645375,0.0029610742,0.0037196884,0.005362342,0.0018899182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017196908,0.000041560816,0.0029704245,0.00007957254,0.000026487867,0.000723619,0.006722827,0.00035336058,0.0010528709,0.957939,0.009745682,0.020327296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047975842,0.00014678045,0.025838602,0.0007947482,0.000089837675,0.0019698206,0.0091896225,0.0014281871,0.003111642,0.21758167,0.7396412,0.00015986853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41069838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4984751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41069838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013571933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027057853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8166157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076162734","doi":"10.1017/s0940739109090018","title":"The Market Overt Method to Obtain Ownership of Lost or Stolen Goods: Comment on <i>Manning</i> v. <i>Algard Estate</i>, [2008] BCSC 1129","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Property","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Daughter; Advertising; Business; Estate tax; Commerce; Economics; Art; Law; Finance; Political science; Tax avoidance","score_opus":0.054509783791833376,"score_gpt":0.38661539119294924,"score_spread":0.3321056074011159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076162734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013418082,0.0025411218,0.00030473372,0.962477,0.0076499083,0.00003607416,0.0002363009,0.00007124288,0.025341751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038867272,0.00065837003,0.00019294358,0.9722878,0.002441358,0.00006013208,0.000037953443,0.000030933657,0.020403864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522567,0.0009104904,0.00046268757,0.00095330446,0.0015024834,0.0009453537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99064493,0.0049358425,0.00060076156,0.00042896514,0.0026103558,0.00077919464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055869254,0.001333102,0.0012547313,0.0008663458,0.013840395,0.0058181416,0.005950223,0.07436201,0.010032412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019069443,0.0013029837,0.0014682309,0.0012121525,0.008902405,0.007917735,0.002900811,0.06612724,0.0060634445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016488913,0.0000117823765,0.00032949887,0.000036418547,0.0000063298203,0.00030272637,0.0009356251,0.0000463918,0.00011402682,0.013344685,0.9827723,0.0020838606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029889476,0.000034611843,0.0022442446,0.0004040422,0.000022136604,0.00038310004,0.0033324538,0.00018143904,0.00034555327,0.0063844468,0.98652554,0.00011255369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2775162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43178248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2775162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010623202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01412406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5518017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076627343","doi":"10.7202/042694ar","title":"Faute lourde and the Perfectly Drafted Exclusion Clause: A « civil» Response to a « Common » Problem with Special Reference to Contracts for the Provision of Security Services","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.008599180939803972,"score_gpt":0.26673581520087963,"score_spread":0.25813663426107564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076627343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03352129,0.006494316,0.027780307,0.44390428,0.003044443,0.000150002,0.00011587034,0.00015523528,0.4848342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6414239,0.0017732983,0.008472282,0.16614355,0.0019596145,0.00035294733,0.0000709366,0.00016086455,0.17964269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98243195,0.0077907727,0.00075837894,0.002417981,0.0038915027,0.0027093454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872442,0.00802284,0.0009926256,0.0013922099,0.0016507088,0.0006974503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014993077,0.00058167154,0.0006767697,0.0011931026,0.012698079,0.015052192,0.00349112,0.02635111,0.004922011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03135108,0.00062424777,0.00111811,0.0009261611,0.03937479,0.0112576205,0.009144291,0.022748075,0.0010165408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000972227,0.0000057943093,0.00010993963,0.000011301836,0.0000017392313,0.00006540293,0.0020154812,0.00006864773,0.000056076966,0.98730075,0.008674999,0.0016800741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087507644,0.00005579229,0.0011831939,0.00041812268,0.000023301334,0.00033498643,0.003766201,0.0010209185,0.00065114774,0.57055277,0.4218112,0.00009489539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057655852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0668593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057655852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0129605485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022154706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114640474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077991194","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000017","title":"THE FIDUCIARY CONSTITUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Constitution; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.015071503721884585,"score_gpt":0.32928223572103665,"score_spread":0.31421073199915206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077991194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020675898,0.0037731659,0.18003058,0.038392927,0.000875702,0.00012016239,0.00023017325,0.00011719652,0.75578415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88752013,0.002686112,0.06178107,0.0061186776,0.0012771564,0.0005901812,0.00020714008,0.00009032097,0.039729256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926887,0.0030206882,0.00037647516,0.0013020756,0.0018189886,0.0007930885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959139,0.0018961614,0.0003729272,0.00089516875,0.0007167779,0.00020506079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009374382,0.00045235272,0.00073161005,0.0022351684,0.004251499,0.0073036044,0.0015288178,0.0042434884,0.004483342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011485725,0.00044732692,0.0007575008,0.0013134799,0.033160638,0.0066230306,0.0048854775,0.00518105,0.0009779325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.820135e-7,0.0000010214284,0.0000075855205,0.0000020097216,5.0446175e-7,0.0000034321104,0.000082087005,0.000040451694,0.0000103862985,0.99921477,0.00020225444,0.00043512156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049568307,0.0000032521739,0.000049222148,0.000033152435,0.0000023419952,0.000019299674,0.00006931182,0.00020987623,0.000054169876,0.9809826,0.018566947,0.000004896299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034241716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002345365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009374382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044189803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055895327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049577057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079011279","doi":"10.1017/s000819731400004x","title":"EXPRESS TERMINATION CLAUSES IN CONTRACTS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Reading (process); Law; Political science; Business; Computer science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.019473972081441346,"score_gpt":0.30527294866899923,"score_spread":0.2857989765875579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079011279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04121889,0.002212955,0.19621144,0.014335429,0.00094713864,0.00025564292,0.00042776793,0.00027256866,0.7441182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86463535,0.0012807657,0.046487864,0.0057904446,0.0006735712,0.0005415139,0.00030299794,0.00015686786,0.0801307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98664665,0.0052484823,0.0012580967,0.0009458902,0.0046994044,0.0012013855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862569,0.0075914892,0.0009280336,0.001857212,0.003093823,0.0002725465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012974148,0.00041082644,0.00048791736,0.0012498153,0.003266774,0.00669921,0.0018923566,0.004169571,0.008708606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020990545,0.00043672806,0.0007713998,0.0018195058,0.013683704,0.0068812543,0.0035919005,0.0061378274,0.0009422397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016460575,0.000001439671,0.000020238349,0.000004399851,6.6012086e-7,0.000013699243,0.00019940751,0.00007769562,0.000030191915,0.99836844,0.0005353524,0.0007468592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016322801,0.000016736805,0.00016232076,0.00011611965,0.000010588944,0.00010853651,0.00038892316,0.0017593701,0.0005984657,0.926929,0.069871515,0.000022246928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069003995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004978217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012974148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005266562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004294918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06861466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079953364","doi":"10.7202/042685ar","title":"La propriété fiduciaire","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Institution; Law and economics; Business; Trust law; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.011106111229003358,"score_gpt":0.27962917889266165,"score_spread":0.2685230676636583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079953364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013426912,0.004824024,0.042043228,0.013646195,0.0015693108,0.000080764745,0.00050674955,0.00038452444,0.92351824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57586163,0.006421113,0.043897044,0.005545344,0.0045461827,0.0007070145,0.0007090152,0.00048057755,0.36183208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898621,0.0026354159,0.0004449719,0.0017970543,0.0041251327,0.0011352957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947513,0.0017280744,0.000541988,0.0010905352,0.001543232,0.00034482076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076331706,0.0011228566,0.0014785293,0.002367179,0.00638456,0.011196013,0.0013469927,0.005552294,0.026049366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013407728,0.00083083956,0.0014655971,0.0018160628,0.010674862,0.009176825,0.0037035686,0.012372505,0.008864573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017454024,0.000012659705,0.00015773276,0.000031269486,0.0000098362,0.000054087814,0.00031035222,0.00008097557,0.00018758222,0.9827141,0.0045195143,0.011904444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010206571,0.00008209825,0.0022973712,0.0002598643,0.000030769854,0.0012980618,0.00036533832,0.0011660723,0.0014715772,0.26105323,0.73178315,0.0000903827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020854829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010007546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026049366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008356917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039776126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08714384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080537559","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttu234","title":"Recent changes in Canada in the areas of trusts and estates law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Legislature; Immigration; Business; Tax planning; Law; Public economics; Law and economics; Public administration; Political science; Economics; Tax avoidance; Tax reform","score_opus":0.017789047269024878,"score_gpt":0.26799809648060213,"score_spread":0.2502090492115773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080537559","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22798161,0.043592885,0.0064148316,0.40951106,0.004086995,0.00020961932,0.0031366304,0.00040255277,0.30466378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81984144,0.027186502,0.0062992517,0.03654017,0.000697228,0.000053761272,0.0008284226,0.00015554918,0.1083977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904047,0.00079956703,0.0003267361,0.00070868386,0.004635366,0.003125046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759253,0.0031589186,0.0019979428,0.00043874874,0.011305145,0.0071740015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044307373,0.0003446923,0.00045100274,0.0036406796,0.014237215,0.0093574235,0.0016954754,0.0027279258,0.009504602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016626693,0.0006427257,0.0007024572,0.0097483825,0.008301787,0.0021456552,0.002371436,0.004692106,0.00046905447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000139677,0.000095534626,0.046441007,0.00061350653,0.000078703226,0.0016001558,0.01630796,0.0034711505,0.0010087817,0.5946858,0.1936463,0.14191142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025552028,0.000032341013,0.10112951,0.00042980514,0.000049836774,0.0004206677,0.01458043,0.00099583,0.00039185418,0.008013384,0.8737924,0.0001383873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99642533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99846435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27996743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27996743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29332057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8351357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081204815","doi":"10.1080/14649350600841651","title":"Third Party Rights of Appeal: Enhancing Democracy or Hindering Progress?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; General partnership; Political science; Appeal; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Democracy; Commission; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.026488607572180006,"score_gpt":0.3570111835413545,"score_spread":0.3305225759691745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081204815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058164676,0.0025214357,0.007183975,0.37969798,0.0021195768,0.00009533657,0.000113695285,0.0002593386,0.6021922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64000326,0.0044754436,0.0074840435,0.1012867,0.003586407,0.00048722664,0.00018878942,0.0007490009,0.24173902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96881735,0.013824761,0.0010387315,0.0020716395,0.008936089,0.0053114174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9087591,0.061590835,0.004397481,0.008640697,0.009848707,0.0067631584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030547602,0.0003642444,0.00072713825,0.002308826,0.0068547707,0.026333716,0.0031255735,0.010850362,0.11271851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14676651,0.00036830758,0.0007739489,0.003684937,0.01571212,0.042008117,0.014116693,0.010771365,0.017335394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022652857,0.000046360936,0.0007700745,0.00010075655,0.0000065602835,0.00012526005,0.0043564243,0.00006929679,0.00008827166,0.7945251,0.15010528,0.04978399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036517893,0.000028048174,0.0013201804,0.0008108136,0.000018615847,0.00018860675,0.013226744,0.00040796757,0.00040083408,0.2890709,0.69445205,0.000038650887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012206695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017002108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11271851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074328217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012876919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37708098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081651053","doi":"10.1163/1573035053683218","title":"General Concepts of Private Law Relating to Private Property in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and in the Civil Code of Quebec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Code (set theory); Law; Russian federation; Political science; Doctrine; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.02681407542268926,"score_gpt":0.2904121342181522,"score_spread":0.26359805879546294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081651053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13634393,0.0731122,0.02897364,0.030653248,0.0005447879,0.0002583011,0.0011527784,0.000105056104,0.72885615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692543,0.009937412,0.0047669774,0.0010636147,0.00012818188,0.00009128811,0.00028241237,0.000012546244,0.014463326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955187,0.0016530568,0.00024558525,0.0003864549,0.0013759941,0.0008202578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541426,0.0021740587,0.0006389338,0.0002826685,0.0012928499,0.0001973265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035302523,0.00035925375,0.00035449615,0.006941372,0.004599292,0.008852078,0.0010081428,0.0021809652,0.0026019576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047941227,0.00025458154,0.00031327162,0.0076775854,0.031470817,0.003064429,0.0013078026,0.0019928955,0.00016707649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026317796,0.0000035511498,0.00045125978,0.000050735634,0.00000250414,0.00005799548,0.0033580805,0.0002829245,0.00008499043,0.9898671,0.0015528968,0.00428538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015902675,0.00003231304,0.03379132,0.0014954135,0.00002568708,0.00044008536,0.022733811,0.001992935,0.00045646916,0.52312374,0.41580537,0.00008704309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62587744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53545356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37412256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039324466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025195986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7526517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083683538","doi":"10.2202/1539-8323.1000","title":"`The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages' and the Morality of Contract Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Morality; Law; Exclusion clause; Breach of contract; Tort; Law and economics; Business; Privity of contract; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Liability; Management","score_opus":0.06565433591071734,"score_gpt":0.3807951665727284,"score_spread":0.31514083066201104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083683538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030512875,0.014132711,0.11995682,0.13138518,0.0014738238,0.000071880546,0.00008627574,0.00013155404,0.70224893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91271466,0.0068209805,0.012925887,0.01754012,0.0021135218,0.00016713154,0.000043970416,0.00008644424,0.047587305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972917,0.0043026097,0.00034819046,0.00075555604,0.003932581,0.0009319348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868837,0.00898968,0.0010419566,0.0012658084,0.001410889,0.00040794117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010245067,0.00045053137,0.00047307718,0.00092594844,0.0039826613,0.010568011,0.0018518814,0.008498283,0.00687602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0199025,0.00048454903,0.00056662806,0.001134886,0.03574887,0.012960323,0.0043727704,0.008675691,0.0008094724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011463727,0.0000022203633,0.0000252356,0.000007944877,6.314597e-7,0.000009803656,0.00042110108,0.00006822091,0.000013593062,0.9968272,0.0012207638,0.001402018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007243376,0.00001186405,0.0002571422,0.00010877459,0.0000033057884,0.000085689186,0.0005088989,0.00052327797,0.000085239684,0.91696346,0.08142888,0.000016156648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043640207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024714344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010568011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055295113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045045787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054181755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085848690","doi":"10.1017/s0940739105050228","title":"Is There an Expert in the House? <i>Thomson v. Christie's</i>: The Case of the Houghton Urns","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Property","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Bachelor; Film director; Art history; History; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.056451942437965134,"score_gpt":0.36909924472906885,"score_spread":0.3126473022911037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085848690","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017573517,0.00626396,0.000846504,0.6192791,0.0021423774,0.000045828587,0.000052745163,0.00003478521,0.3537612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22329433,0.0029831545,0.0005368766,0.45512435,0.001468201,0.000060382263,0.000026060772,0.0000828279,0.31642377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444145,0.0011975334,0.00016088906,0.00083646725,0.0012433215,0.0021203056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463475,0.0023778765,0.00031256836,0.0002548628,0.000821257,0.0015987238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005030416,0.00031445295,0.00059750647,0.00071042083,0.024645286,0.013067765,0.0019542295,0.024551049,0.018554581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016982587,0.00079945294,0.00042500894,0.0006770068,0.011449082,0.0072952393,0.0042483835,0.020263586,0.0022589637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003418306,0.000022099352,0.0013552367,0.00006685548,0.000014009033,0.0038011782,0.016038416,0.000066503635,0.00026772075,0.43591967,0.5328294,0.009584688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022245013,0.000017750837,0.0012886489,0.00046373796,0.00002169794,0.0012957051,0.020345984,0.00014411888,0.00054806686,0.025011588,0.9507672,0.00007328078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2782446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4739125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2782446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014675564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01644115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5532501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085925177","doi":"10.7202/1019045ar","title":"Réflexions autour de la diversité des modes de réception ou d’adaptation du trust dans les pays de droit civil","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031481138605264275,"score_gpt":0.27272276285760133,"score_spread":0.24124162425233706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085925177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4940718,0.005609469,0.017718157,0.06592519,0.00026368804,0.00008100005,0.00036672357,0.000091599795,0.41587237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98555183,0.00061163225,0.0008393214,0.0008125224,0.000033311146,0.000017376387,0.000024617206,0.000025771807,0.012083595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99232423,0.0034033174,0.00016198542,0.0006818423,0.0018769415,0.0015517349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98819274,0.004446498,0.0012579908,0.0013283971,0.0038046932,0.0009697481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008058877,0.0002774701,0.00040915655,0.0024398144,0.009125904,0.010444396,0.0012070162,0.0018235085,0.007347544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017785577,0.00029892186,0.00032158583,0.0029875066,0.023282256,0.004342551,0.003933004,0.002893696,0.000467652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048690537,0.000010476558,0.014966879,0.00010291599,0.000029353218,0.00033103532,0.12584051,0.0006044124,0.0004052589,0.82407826,0.0072800107,0.026302181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030691033,0.000063216765,0.13363397,0.0014889437,0.000103426086,0.000641164,0.3066701,0.0038154651,0.0014787042,0.18423139,0.36761662,0.00022636053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6873731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7451311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6873731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037215605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022540534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62893605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086104902","doi":"10.7202/043946ar","title":"La responsabilité contractuelle dans la tourmente","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.008308118538877371,"score_gpt":0.26778577065474446,"score_spread":0.2594776521158671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086104902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12530574,0.0012045755,0.005246784,0.012502183,0.00046126868,0.00009067548,0.0002126776,0.00008481323,0.8548913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39510497,0.000590371,0.0013586818,0.0012037735,0.00006255052,0.000042910182,0.00009225274,0.00005817558,0.6014864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986394,0.00030061678,0.00002750134,0.0001751689,0.00032125495,0.0005359861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916804,0.00013717494,0.00006859306,0.000082118786,0.0002593726,0.00028461416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009687924,0.00029226844,0.00019430688,0.000532377,0.01044587,0.0050289105,0.0006639504,0.0019149556,0.03093615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011631475,0.00033333563,0.00035228327,0.00060300063,0.0075567616,0.001967325,0.0023749163,0.003317335,0.003079488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065151566,0.00003620629,0.0060533225,0.00008554183,0.00001272809,0.00074794836,0.08379954,0.0003945226,0.0018898973,0.8429681,0.026766472,0.03718068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007316166,0.00003820193,0.014046597,0.00014086749,0.00000724066,0.00031388126,0.029498061,0.00026320925,0.00052077026,0.00881211,0.9463099,0.000041818716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40347934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6269772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40347934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011879544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01638577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80226165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086644342","doi":"10.1108/01443330510791243","title":"Where does all the money go? An investigation of donation filtration","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Heaven; Preamble; Law; Economic Justice; Statute; Donation; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.03424844925212344,"score_gpt":0.37211483476035984,"score_spread":0.3378663855082364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086644342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26225275,0.0042304145,0.009428706,0.030032957,0.00027951977,0.00016351003,0.0002760744,0.00005664395,0.69327945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708838,0.0011638205,0.00081369036,0.0018044041,0.00012263477,0.00006387524,0.000052807474,0.000025292135,0.025069602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463177,0.002387956,0.00021171628,0.0005763998,0.0010878744,0.0011042791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862017,0.008534802,0.0015480727,0.0010136875,0.0018590697,0.00084271264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008819621,0.00021791208,0.0008817398,0.0027350269,0.009257156,0.010857454,0.0019547234,0.003967213,0.018037353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03282171,0.00025347227,0.0008533148,0.004932763,0.011376957,0.01070461,0.0075709615,0.0037802735,0.0010872413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033633685,0.000050342533,0.003608846,0.000044258653,0.000009596119,0.00012782725,0.0045615174,0.00015689063,0.00002709319,0.9778152,0.004052119,0.00951266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003849698,0.000075553624,0.010885462,0.0004517541,0.00006576225,0.0004413433,0.01896307,0.002383555,0.00037113158,0.82054484,0.1457324,0.00004667028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019908737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013584988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019908737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009304759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062459363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06751108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086905955","doi":"10.7202/1007819ar","title":"“I Will Not Give You a Penny More Than You Deserve”:*Ontario v. Fraser and the (Uncertain) Right to Collectively Bargain in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Good faith; Jurisprudence; Underpinning; Meaning (existential); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Right to health; Faith; Health services; Sociology; Health care; Medicine; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022253009406999456,"score_gpt":0.26693569428016517,"score_spread":0.24468268487316572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086905955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05095417,0.002979117,0.0025862649,0.49130717,0.00063147227,0.00008890281,0.00028257715,0.000043635788,0.45112672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77012795,0.001761714,0.0016827836,0.10637457,0.00037155542,0.00007304153,0.0000633627,0.00004553923,0.119499564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952083,0.00057421875,0.00010470722,0.0004531696,0.0018167108,0.0018427785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973053,0.0010638366,0.00019619803,0.000102715894,0.0007946043,0.0005373117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029548486,0.00035312504,0.00032392034,0.0004485599,0.02443659,0.005891669,0.001858571,0.0107166795,0.0056969975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007563495,0.00048712455,0.00048783177,0.0008439654,0.015161449,0.0021748128,0.0019368569,0.0066136634,0.0004907954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003645918,0.000018465567,0.0034983028,0.00006244647,0.000019081403,0.0008874273,0.015291977,0.00044686397,0.00047234067,0.7914622,0.18050179,0.007302515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006191913,0.000043966567,0.010581307,0.0004432867,0.000071700284,0.0004998048,0.019891815,0.0018939223,0.0011240805,0.101037376,0.8641386,0.00021229955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97777265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05746418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05746418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08781286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41693377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087416828","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01809.x","title":"Aristotle's Theory of Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Analytic philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.048568168009053836,"score_gpt":0.3098308887936929,"score_spread":0.2612627207846391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087416828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007515504,0.005997184,0.06762736,0.035308186,0.0025147449,0.00012455997,0.00023669949,0.0001565615,0.8805192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75341034,0.004852525,0.04248855,0.01794822,0.004402267,0.0005749778,0.00012091504,0.00016734212,0.17603473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956774,0.0014990905,0.0002537759,0.0005845316,0.0014099192,0.0005752821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978514,0.0010045923,0.00015621741,0.00025116713,0.0005818469,0.00015486033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004580175,0.0009254347,0.0019289559,0.004670972,0.009531512,0.0072500715,0.0015504328,0.009008225,0.0060762116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005634832,0.00079884566,0.0012737748,0.0024984395,0.033151668,0.008802963,0.0034658636,0.009425901,0.0017698465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016793712,0.0000021345995,0.000008420142,0.0000073037104,0.0000019026684,0.000006711248,0.00018210168,0.000047411326,0.0000053657377,0.9975715,0.0015195828,0.0006458369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063054863,0.0000030086455,0.000031279375,0.000013733154,0.0000023363832,0.000014485251,0.0000419679,0.00008269184,0.000017459572,0.98791075,0.011871162,0.0000047596855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010495319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013294465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010495319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008439918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063293506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061236143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087499840","doi":"10.1093/library/8.4.423","title":"Unclaimed Territory: The Ballad of ‘Auld Robin Gray’ and the Assertion of Authorial Ownership","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Ballad; Assertion; Gray (unit); Art; Art history; History; Literature; Computer science; Medicine; Poetry","score_opus":0.018995794487428476,"score_gpt":0.27884909238086003,"score_spread":0.25985329789343153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087499840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16245213,0.008865127,0.009056794,0.08845633,0.0014820073,0.000031230804,0.000059082533,0.000121368066,0.729476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97551733,0.0005939597,0.00043590294,0.0020638637,0.00036636484,0.000012635951,0.000007556994,0.00004287867,0.020959688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991892,0.005667195,0.00020529692,0.0005192846,0.0012290468,0.00048728703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812237,0.014169447,0.0012557241,0.0012940848,0.001393012,0.0006640925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073721213,0.00020909372,0.00042713847,0.0014366967,0.010177542,0.01084142,0.0011440711,0.0027569735,0.0040366338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018903209,0.00025911155,0.0001367141,0.0013238499,0.046626654,0.00761042,0.006354712,0.0037266659,0.00064540654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002787002,0.000006640626,0.00023188512,0.00003939301,0.0000023082362,0.00023177323,0.14560913,0.000044467073,0.00015974617,0.83907986,0.009407074,0.005159865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001680852,0.000041781444,0.0010810645,0.0006434949,0.0000121985595,0.00045478132,0.15491849,0.00039799148,0.0010333589,0.21120963,0.6301409,0.000049549355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009214862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010246953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01084142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055350307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031372567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040159702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208829756","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada: Its History, Powers and Responsibilities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Court of record; Jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Political science; Constitution; Appeal; Court of equity; Sociology","score_opus":0.033611701399108226,"score_gpt":0.29595418695150155,"score_spread":0.2623424855523933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208829756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029017491,0.17475146,0.0024220385,0.2248446,0.0027524687,0.000046210887,0.000577783,0.00012656164,0.56546146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8014129,0.06838169,0.0022122492,0.02467886,0.0014221288,0.00004178069,0.0002750862,0.000099575285,0.10147567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99188906,0.0009023042,0.00014382694,0.00063838804,0.004080681,0.0023458672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936812,0.001229325,0.00025137313,0.00013960592,0.0032320872,0.0014664129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002795804,0.00032191403,0.00039407282,0.0035744896,0.03017154,0.017181812,0.0019910517,0.0045846123,0.004547631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010022669,0.0005176883,0.00022169924,0.008161867,0.02239058,0.0029615122,0.0027222808,0.006669096,0.0004207992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115456305,0.000009040672,0.00215451,0.00007517906,0.00000862389,0.00022800357,0.010204942,0.00025914708,0.000112786445,0.8330681,0.099972285,0.053895842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062431386,0.000007937938,0.008752447,0.0005346769,0.000013025426,0.00013274637,0.0063170656,0.00030159258,0.00010128943,0.04174214,0.94202954,0.000061336796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98606354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83281565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16718434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2177468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9659481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089711025","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0015","title":"Formalism in Music and Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Theoretical physics; Political science; Physics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.03416187840239202,"score_gpt":0.2359458338655684,"score_spread":0.20178395546317637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089711025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026866615,0.042045116,0.22783037,0.10010199,0.0019745573,0.00008311227,0.00019108139,0.0005480761,0.6003591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096548,0.012966554,0.038950942,0.00496259,0.0014069645,0.00012901615,0.00009276747,0.00016441946,0.031671964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658066,0.0019607744,0.00016480582,0.00036795126,0.000669678,0.0002562025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639267,0.0021890218,0.00028922752,0.00055156345,0.0003177616,0.00025981758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054768194,0.0004618145,0.00062577415,0.0015311517,0.0050902152,0.008586472,0.0012340524,0.0035753401,0.003513012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008832452,0.00039286638,0.0006719858,0.0014108481,0.047633782,0.008552575,0.0040700664,0.0035112565,0.00062706793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.305268e-7,9.021751e-7,0.00002093023,0.000006688511,6.398075e-7,0.0000063616394,0.00038808622,0.00015165989,0.000010215405,0.99791354,0.00045200269,0.001048133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035618698,0.0000030126969,0.000045153043,0.0000339137,0.0000010427918,0.000016175964,0.00017895013,0.0004351917,0.00002474114,0.97771513,0.021538263,0.000004821531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022879971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013706762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022879971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00959399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007102903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06960964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091780201","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqi030","title":"General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Generality; Philosophy of law; Black letter law; Value (mathematics); Positive law; Comparative law; Sociology; Political science; Private law; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.0382762265684625,"score_gpt":0.3736142316878724,"score_spread":0.33533800511940987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091780201","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010951948,0.070086025,0.000749369,0.39759877,0.4068637,0.00006206059,0.00017590048,0.00012855734,0.123240426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021164494,0.041761983,0.0017869611,0.15454516,0.29936513,0.00028435874,0.000445133,0.0002477336,0.48039904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435884,0.00080701173,0.00032800177,0.00059677963,0.0031262846,0.0007830558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99304867,0.0015306689,0.00032717714,0.000453148,0.0028559947,0.0017842317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007361099,0.0015450588,0.0015039645,0.004445711,0.0066524786,0.011360182,0.0026073833,0.02591629,0.031420276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01607512,0.0011441709,0.0019979968,0.00223879,0.0073385383,0.007289547,0.007844873,0.016762668,0.019711362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024996812,0.00006695021,0.00009514491,0.000112324706,0.00000833152,0.00019236194,0.00016405988,0.000094746414,0.00012491662,0.029685387,0.9522463,0.017184492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012907941,0.000022801249,0.00046770493,0.00028343525,0.000005568413,0.000098875935,0.00010835376,0.00003196736,0.000033037584,0.016159883,0.9827627,0.000012708465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048844647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009935288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031420276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008939226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004609806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10511124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209244313","doi":"","title":"The Passing of Palsgraf","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Injustice; Duty; Res ipsa loquitur; Law; Liability; Warrant; Contributory negligence; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Damages; Correlative; Tort; Business; Restitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014385366736749845,"score_gpt":0.3074557942666959,"score_spread":0.29307042752994605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209244313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027513161,0.005456234,0.01385618,0.26109245,0.0047045727,0.00005584035,0.00017566062,0.00021127638,0.68693465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6687135,0.0030834286,0.0048121247,0.078353256,0.0029413975,0.00014145838,0.00011562819,0.00021561231,0.24162357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611986,0.000996847,0.00010213936,0.0009896792,0.0011415324,0.00065003213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755967,0.0013326549,0.00012338367,0.00029167352,0.00048837456,0.00020415564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004371654,0.00057944324,0.0006062106,0.0011305463,0.0070785433,0.0064592594,0.0009797781,0.007938426,0.010843599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011575791,0.00031744977,0.00061542756,0.00044471666,0.015302202,0.008209173,0.0045700166,0.011919413,0.0025011173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012344009,0.0000058033247,0.00009238312,0.00000868078,0.0000029034188,0.00005073327,0.00053619494,0.0000627119,0.00003454295,0.9629303,0.029714612,0.006548665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017366025,0.000045527217,0.0003637176,0.000110308836,0.000017191473,0.00014820744,0.0006642232,0.000451695,0.0004717787,0.39621565,0.6014623,0.000031985543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014389806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011305767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014389806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004620369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068884734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036275446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209330860","doi":"","title":"Parent to Child Transfers: Gift or Resulting Trust?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Property (philosophy); Database transaction; Law and economics; Business; Voluntary association; Transaction cost; Turnover; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.017862903066787925,"score_gpt":0.3213200954850756,"score_spread":0.30345719241828767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209330860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14664005,0.009573924,0.0459031,0.20178689,0.0015929763,0.00015636835,0.00015130728,0.00014198666,0.5940533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95926046,0.002006925,0.00179122,0.010556056,0.00029787756,0.000065120075,0.00001830665,0.000026791577,0.025977345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954411,0.0016817638,0.0002356196,0.0005570625,0.0011315091,0.0009528736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557805,0.0023546861,0.00063791004,0.0005190932,0.0005674572,0.0003428347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005618728,0.0002315506,0.0004553884,0.00053759245,0.0034634008,0.003715199,0.001427695,0.006891498,0.00625393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020062795,0.00030042324,0.00041731278,0.0006069798,0.015623409,0.007888326,0.0044715204,0.006034194,0.0006451793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008839239,0.000010808458,0.0007181199,0.000014562106,0.000002947522,0.0003560103,0.0034718576,0.00009537461,0.000059370825,0.98917854,0.0017804751,0.004303049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047220095,0.00011938705,0.0029469093,0.0006353119,0.000046992238,0.003017835,0.012046258,0.0015280244,0.0009786853,0.7757531,0.2028226,0.000057735666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015310134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012203659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015310134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051916237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055357814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03766805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094653475","doi":"10.7202/042368ar","title":"La nouvelle justice naturelle : l'administrateur « équitable et raisonnable »","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Political science; Statutory law; Writ; Context (archaeology); Duty; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.013359517374735326,"score_gpt":0.2988544118574932,"score_spread":0.28549489448275783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094653475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015623192,0.015836082,0.02901535,0.23225458,0.0015882847,0.0000853455,0.0000687267,0.00014652374,0.70538193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7684946,0.006648591,0.0090924995,0.033317015,0.0023092364,0.00019832749,0.000060710296,0.00015647517,0.17972258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98811215,0.0058254064,0.00033767993,0.0010927805,0.0030322117,0.001599699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964992,0.0014606665,0.00039892702,0.00038061343,0.0007038241,0.0005567649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008159122,0.0002494013,0.00032460602,0.0006052493,0.0073397234,0.016699385,0.0009673868,0.0044820122,0.0037648573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008555373,0.00028438182,0.00033061323,0.0006898265,0.018009715,0.006943937,0.004418328,0.0059413,0.0008144202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031243655,0.000005075986,0.00009860577,0.000011346321,0.000001313878,0.000022584725,0.0015380471,0.0000736032,0.000055945893,0.98606735,0.007945189,0.0041778143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009568253,0.000017525068,0.0005999314,0.00010228577,0.0000047990115,0.00007280556,0.0015911,0.00030953562,0.00019753815,0.31131768,0.6857627,0.000014510568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040278044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04172969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040278044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013120809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020126197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09519857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094733356","doi":"10.7202/1020653ar","title":"Le cas des inaptes juridiques et leur (ir)responsabilité civile","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01702386360015871,"score_gpt":0.2808126431122535,"score_spread":0.2637887795120948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094733356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24434394,0.01140312,0.0059947385,0.092687555,0.0017335642,0.00019214534,0.0004014518,0.00011499945,0.64312845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.800283,0.005980401,0.0015934897,0.0082923565,0.00071699376,0.00009320507,0.00016353678,0.000043067324,0.18283398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941603,0.0014659541,0.00022159104,0.00060241413,0.0014176734,0.0021320914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931306,0.002018532,0.0014912713,0.00055150234,0.0016544551,0.0011536153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005188741,0.0003777416,0.00045414403,0.0016382205,0.010245425,0.008613842,0.0014375069,0.0041813287,0.028073736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018499766,0.00038977552,0.00036932036,0.0013113,0.007207658,0.0036930037,0.0040150634,0.006409151,0.0029461668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015777879,0.00009465982,0.039995257,0.0005005528,0.000056495835,0.009856827,0.060487498,0.00051813736,0.0011512341,0.740409,0.058570467,0.08820213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046017973,0.00012970308,0.053455036,0.001198631,0.00009060945,0.012674795,0.06192886,0.00071191567,0.0012649671,0.058980156,0.80940187,0.00011745802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11694877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17888334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11694877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007160887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01607466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23253614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095422546","doi":"10.7202/043896ar","title":"La libération de la caution par la mise en oeuvre de l’article 2363 du Code civil du Québec : de la théorie à la pratique","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0045975792614745105,"score_gpt":0.24645200939975212,"score_spread":0.24185443013827762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095422546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03975514,0.0099437535,0.026093226,0.37740153,0.0013617096,0.00013606451,0.00051024946,0.0000917217,0.5447065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456024,0.003687468,0.0056879763,0.026209343,0.0004342229,0.00015720184,0.00009809306,0.00008937977,0.11803389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99128646,0.0034619523,0.00022901382,0.0011721203,0.0025516977,0.001298811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871472,0.0059466055,0.00080438185,0.0009500424,0.0043980316,0.00075372664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009686624,0.0006448409,0.00052809395,0.0013222799,0.013744836,0.011369569,0.0028432086,0.010744338,0.012029398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015506653,0.00053730735,0.0006525963,0.0017038616,0.043007985,0.0062786816,0.0027523022,0.011009931,0.0010824766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009472238,0.0000061679953,0.00059534685,0.000041292817,0.000005916094,0.0000930422,0.011817826,0.00027649116,0.00008427367,0.97108465,0.012651271,0.0033342533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039187158,0.000039337985,0.0054904623,0.0012311676,0.000038804963,0.00016282019,0.022510689,0.0027307235,0.0006088601,0.38525677,0.58175385,0.00013733735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8851469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8791255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114853084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084284805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09897171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6115319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097717937","doi":"10.1093/jel/14.3.421","title":"Intergenerational Trusts and Environmental Protection","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Environmental health; Environmental planning; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.020480590108337728,"score_gpt":0.22956329343212947,"score_spread":0.20908270332379175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097717937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06606676,0.018436803,0.0010251541,0.056897994,0.000540261,0.00003527644,0.00039516258,0.000041454092,0.8565611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72343343,0.0095103495,0.00031510065,0.0019098184,0.00012415218,0.000022042732,0.00011289575,0.000031441403,0.2645407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979804,0.00042094025,0.00005353982,0.0001315599,0.0005531366,0.00086054124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496895,0.0011356156,0.000644919,0.00030848736,0.001512364,0.0014296927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00149117,0.00021758092,0.00021825996,0.0012907677,0.0071352585,0.007304189,0.0006012798,0.0026622214,0.032544736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061846375,0.0002454226,0.00016243116,0.0037620685,0.0050162496,0.003967984,0.0030348226,0.0026388955,0.0011422869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015030504,0.00003641528,0.006011202,0.00004172565,0.0000096880185,0.0002647095,0.009584597,0.00023845801,0.00003344103,0.8918697,0.06735133,0.024543602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016750393,0.000023433768,0.03759604,0.00049685326,0.00002772413,0.00025250006,0.023110716,0.00042313847,0.00011865474,0.09986127,0.83803123,0.000041641957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7158828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8743155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7158828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02561589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025760394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5715809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097724759","doi":"10.7202/1009065ar","title":"Toward A Federal Legal Theory of the City","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Institution; Politics; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political economy","score_opus":0.06941978909998069,"score_gpt":0.31631197118256693,"score_spread":0.24689218208258623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097724759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036353085,0.0029803095,0.10816081,0.077493384,0.00036708565,0.00008985163,0.00043914793,0.00022530672,0.7738911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9004603,0.0018748783,0.022351542,0.0063453517,0.00035720132,0.0001963652,0.00035040622,0.00008627953,0.06797769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776447,0.0006654766,0.00005795819,0.00038870363,0.00049970637,0.0006237401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889463,0.00029080454,0.000096949676,0.00015989774,0.00039338798,0.00016432523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021381483,0.00023408227,0.0005656699,0.0028541146,0.009012295,0.010210982,0.0016733364,0.0036308407,0.008951532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021612954,0.0004045877,0.0007868145,0.0024206948,0.01613671,0.0052097267,0.0038264822,0.005195895,0.0009485861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2968287e-7,0.0000012237117,0.000039504142,0.0000016625775,3.7088486e-7,0.000003001789,0.00008327682,0.00019546656,0.0000038557337,0.998718,0.00059919554,0.00035407252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009025995,0.0000050415956,0.00053910585,0.000037406426,0.0000062477484,0.00001627655,0.0004940121,0.002728306,0.000054288965,0.92659366,0.069506936,0.000009714168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18206358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17006706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18206358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022600658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018092137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36200768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098201070","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2325","title":"The stripping of the trust: A study in legal evolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Liability; Economic Justice; Creditor; Business; Externality; Value (mathematics); Distributive property; Welfare; Stripping (fiber); Law and economics; Point (geometry); Inequality; Punitive damages; Service (business); Public economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Debt; Economics; Law; Finance; Microeconomics; Marketing","score_opus":0.010026889588759615,"score_gpt":0.24335590176580496,"score_spread":0.23332901217704535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098201070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77564144,0.0037614598,0.010088027,0.02668131,0.00011522861,0.000079740596,0.00005596098,0.000033036034,0.18354383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995596,0.0005434662,0.000597727,0.0002919707,0.000018119496,0.000008517061,0.000009096764,0.000009825297,0.0029252365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510574,0.002531118,0.00018518785,0.00047566282,0.00082206837,0.000880286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98721075,0.0071777585,0.0017566811,0.0013751683,0.001478563,0.0010010756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005655415,0.00014357537,0.00038679762,0.002308492,0.009993821,0.007107111,0.0014870175,0.0025242453,0.0032166082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019621,0.00033097368,0.00036230413,0.0031038283,0.04481944,0.010072674,0.0053247903,0.003500282,0.00017522335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017558994,0.000027806867,0.004161852,0.000034370183,0.000004888835,0.00042540795,0.08592229,0.0004145814,0.00016912371,0.8967681,0.0008007958,0.01125328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054929766,0.00018501811,0.049591843,0.00055623474,0.000045228957,0.0013580016,0.24599859,0.006596767,0.0014989406,0.43934393,0.25466773,0.00010277334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12819539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10551624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12819539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033082686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010906072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25489843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098784701","doi":"","title":"Judicial Independence and the Administration of the Judiciary in Trinidad and Tobago","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Caribbean dialogue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Administration (probate law); Judicial independence; Political science; Control (management); Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.010329785135524936,"score_gpt":0.2627390759528027,"score_spread":0.25240929081727775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098784701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5027204,0.01279089,0.0016845246,0.07121756,0.00028200066,0.00010361213,0.0001548455,0.000051463758,0.41099456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98135203,0.0015702236,0.00035347336,0.0021201274,0.000039519655,0.000037547714,0.00004076481,0.000011251741,0.014475058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974886,0.0005783658,0.00007528446,0.00015283922,0.00030461553,0.0014002604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982185,0.0005792316,0.00032440753,0.00009977406,0.00038859466,0.00038941213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018240868,0.00023771866,0.0003982797,0.002296386,0.00863525,0.006962411,0.000931826,0.0020633482,0.00511321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041410294,0.00034383454,0.00025707824,0.0019122215,0.016026154,0.0014809677,0.007077427,0.0046748947,0.00018481082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008372276,0.00003365423,0.007248688,0.00017324215,0.000024375777,0.00088428863,0.023094,0.0011317901,0.000602549,0.9419509,0.005278126,0.019494627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003111349,0.00012119125,0.18728489,0.0019615064,0.00012585621,0.00066912564,0.07391221,0.0016361475,0.00088569534,0.27918506,0.4536203,0.00028684532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6051213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75143695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6051213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04105543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03557884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7944084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102091871","doi":"","title":"Identity verification in conveyancing: The failure of current legislative and regulatory measures, and recommendations for change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conveyancing; Legislature; Identity (music); Land registration; Business; Legislative process; Law; Political science; Land tenure; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.07919075346162456,"score_gpt":0.3006850063940702,"score_spread":0.22149425293244562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102091871","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022091074,0.005995523,0.05695565,0.82074594,0.0022952855,0.00053137663,0.00009390353,0.00036053747,0.09093069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7503573,0.0071656895,0.09834809,0.108280726,0.0016441209,0.00090118195,0.00015886256,0.0003089984,0.032835055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8683779,0.06823585,0.009225823,0.010657084,0.03508188,0.008421492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78719676,0.1254484,0.012630257,0.022972984,0.045986712,0.005764856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15443002,0.0005934915,0.0008926755,0.0035995422,0.015099438,0.035764422,0.009371814,0.02495864,0.0054134224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19257899,0.0010091157,0.0011395013,0.0030818924,0.056543883,0.038540654,0.01079747,0.024553236,0.00174779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021784235,0.00011644831,0.0015809233,0.00026489855,0.000014481055,0.00017772935,0.009434069,0.00075942674,0.0002409184,0.9011329,0.03451001,0.051746506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006938934,0.00015083712,0.0032230963,0.0028828196,0.000050925853,0.00050408737,0.045102023,0.0050260415,0.002264747,0.590207,0.3503047,0.00021433023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0381171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032816194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15443002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024735432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056890067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81671375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104210821","doi":"10.7202/043593ar","title":"Les clauses abusives dans les contrats d'adhésion","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Civil code; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02027449894832291,"score_gpt":0.28925038494075206,"score_spread":0.26897588599242916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104210821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059604257,0.0072568627,0.016293036,0.0350273,0.0036297448,0.00028813424,0.0012371285,0.00016508109,0.87649846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45958826,0.004469271,0.004781701,0.016992299,0.001123161,0.00039912295,0.0005975972,0.00025138567,0.5117972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968298,0.000741341,0.00014323906,0.0004942009,0.0011427656,0.0006486781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713945,0.0011488977,0.00023227512,0.00016078277,0.0011875442,0.00013108822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015840733,0.0008047071,0.0004228034,0.0015222294,0.009748819,0.005531187,0.001769357,0.00345697,0.012854064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004432549,0.0004330711,0.00065019995,0.0014272063,0.010482467,0.0029872693,0.002183193,0.006014461,0.0016776058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004081984,0.000028346301,0.0019655435,0.0002581781,0.000017643843,0.0005068615,0.05823185,0.00025974313,0.0013883696,0.84701365,0.07488707,0.015401868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000949906,0.000015916627,0.00777462,0.00042146438,0.000021244596,0.00029358015,0.018619487,0.00031534932,0.00095712714,0.017928062,0.95359087,0.000052859017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.587701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7073141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.587701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019588547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013676459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8294542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106469123","doi":"","title":"Chinese \"Administrative Suit Law Amendment\" Review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.12695442448381722,"score_gpt":0.4869668691821506,"score_spread":0.3600124446983334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106469123","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0098604625,0.8300224,0.0011798216,0.025721598,0.007747852,0.00054460956,0.00127398,0.00008530378,0.123564005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07658429,0.8712168,0.0009731594,0.01671147,0.0038368863,0.00046785007,0.0014174558,0.000025036492,0.028767109],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997285,0.00051433756,0.00031315055,0.00019569622,0.0014147826,0.00027712478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971462,0.0008863625,0.00032668698,0.000106528765,0.0014024533,0.00013189619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036878986,0.0004707158,0.00073112635,0.0070210015,0.0017593682,0.0020453434,0.001401862,0.0013891126,0.011926816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073390566,0.0002461162,0.00073560997,0.008413626,0.001709626,0.0017809093,0.0010920449,0.0009059785,0.0011205134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006339516,0.000069013346,0.003246015,0.02310453,0.00017114056,0.00060822046,0.00091671763,0.0003541686,0.0005463808,0.0691065,0.48768628,0.41412768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015566979,0.000036152156,0.013129423,0.0062329355,0.00021099404,0.0002677156,0.0003271548,0.0001702285,0.0003492712,0.00212237,0.97711617,0.000021909935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025924653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030070024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025924653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051622284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026116002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051547527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106526324","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2222836","title":"The Public Fiduciary: Emerging Themes in Canadian Fiduciary Law for Pension Trustees","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Pension; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Business; Law; Liability; Law and economics; Supreme court; Political science; Economics; Finance; Duty","score_opus":0.014802968616249074,"score_gpt":0.28703577595112956,"score_spread":0.2722328073348805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106526324","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09670698,0.015572519,0.004955768,0.574196,0.0016843994,0.0001332237,0.0004998842,0.000093608985,0.3061576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8824837,0.005699818,0.0027478246,0.0480566,0.0006642938,0.000100611556,0.00016526159,0.00009632566,0.059985522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96877533,0.003416617,0.0008565949,0.0026676543,0.010611257,0.013672522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9576242,0.019039543,0.0016071165,0.0013306334,0.012067235,0.008331249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022990689,0.00055633194,0.0010142704,0.0058174166,0.054664638,0.044552706,0.007651466,0.021338155,0.011218117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05952326,0.001108304,0.0013647928,0.010279142,0.040073827,0.011744456,0.008956419,0.022208434,0.0004671234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016369184,0.000023651492,0.0024599575,0.00006796683,0.000010319977,0.00015999853,0.020141508,0.000234947,0.00007474362,0.9308687,0.035596162,0.010345722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050783132,0.00003861697,0.028008986,0.0014062951,0.00008444758,0.00023500521,0.09366291,0.001864016,0.00033374163,0.16632092,0.70765024,0.0003440459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99640036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34345767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.34345767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.50464207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76149607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109971841","doi":"","title":"Trust Law Implications of Proposed Regulatory Reform of Mutual Fund Governance Structures A Background Research Report to Concept Proposal 81-402 of the Canadian Securities Administrators","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Law and economics; Mutual fund; Regulatory reform; Finance; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.11331000599369091,"score_gpt":0.38142877941441483,"score_spread":0.26811877342072393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109971841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12065858,0.0020004166,0.031915642,0.44185993,0.0018816959,0.0012610371,0.00056560163,0.00024649533,0.39961055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89948356,0.0010417402,0.014597056,0.02582445,0.0009797098,0.00046453608,0.00012330693,0.000049231483,0.05743637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746883,0.00719222,0.00086540636,0.0017793778,0.009512491,0.005962233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588884,0.020392288,0.002363738,0.0026813745,0.013652811,0.0020213283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023954898,0.0004538807,0.0005875452,0.0020035126,0.008999877,0.015198644,0.0038716157,0.015429188,0.007001468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08996592,0.00069441274,0.0014779634,0.0016093036,0.018451096,0.00621663,0.0024433183,0.011086058,0.00061997067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025319248,0.00004151313,0.0003199284,0.000020004147,0.0000059464155,0.000072684175,0.0008547981,0.0010357904,0.00023608745,0.98771614,0.0073093884,0.002362308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004553696,0.00024064585,0.007283767,0.00046780639,0.000258197,0.00018496324,0.006156757,0.019016687,0.005748865,0.80383277,0.15604359,0.000310718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4745004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46940425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5254996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052218724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0804969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.943477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109974976","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12114","title":"<i>Righting Educational Wrongs: Disability Studies in Law and Education</i> . By Arlene S. Kanter and Beth A. Ferri, eds. Syracuse: Syracuse Univ. Press, 2013. 402 pp. $45.00 cloth.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Citation; Sociology; Library science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.030625592569466318,"score_gpt":0.35602749078630247,"score_spread":0.3254018982168361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109974976","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022538615,0.8986884,0.00022898111,0.083106115,0.0044919886,0.0000062174577,0.000038916187,0.000014277157,0.013199781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017026527,0.92991215,0.00037083135,0.023954706,0.010337943,0.000029348956,0.0001247606,0.00001623368,0.01822749],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972905,0.0014361015,0.0001344578,0.00012945637,0.00074774027,0.00026173686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944494,0.0033463044,0.0005877995,0.00020816906,0.0009579809,0.00045038786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028872658,0.000851514,0.00070499396,0.003674167,0.0016638776,0.0042125066,0.0012341229,0.0039885524,0.010692235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009204433,0.00032347688,0.0006676134,0.003021791,0.0075462693,0.009253384,0.0034003998,0.003355223,0.0025744126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010913221,0.00001421559,0.0003746517,0.0010428356,0.000017034257,0.00011212373,0.00077803625,0.00006821681,0.000045100645,0.035053242,0.87190425,0.09057927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007020374,0.000018478786,0.0024674085,0.007398945,0.000021321368,0.0005149763,0.0027853935,0.00007677878,0.00007592945,0.0594572,0.9271604,0.000016192993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015970599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035658844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015970599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037128262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056620715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035769105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110013063","doi":"10.1017/s0008197300300101","title":"<scp>A DUTY TO GIVE REASONS?</scp>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Estate; Duty; Aside; Law; Flannery; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.019805880869202878,"score_gpt":0.2934907427046273,"score_spread":0.27368486183542445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110013063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035984083,0.0018311663,0.0017924,0.40370736,0.0024379008,0.00005381373,0.0001643114,0.000091491886,0.5863232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18936318,0.0014262904,0.0018691542,0.518572,0.002452118,0.00016651831,0.00012469682,0.00011133047,0.28591475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714214,0.00087370595,0.00013745108,0.00026585785,0.00089869666,0.0006822226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696034,0.0013858414,0.00021454906,0.00030946138,0.0007684367,0.00036132443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038108737,0.00039749342,0.00035506845,0.0005294434,0.007789826,0.0047790604,0.0013420678,0.02192549,0.026748097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011447441,0.0004949954,0.0005100457,0.00055613817,0.009279176,0.0044115186,0.0023979864,0.0097913435,0.010033231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000167271,0.000014264163,0.00031047934,0.000039183848,0.0000039505876,0.00027476088,0.0020915845,0.00003224048,0.00012643948,0.4404198,0.5499187,0.006751863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018858593,0.000019689627,0.00084563706,0.00021831886,0.0000069700186,0.0005196468,0.001997282,0.00014004744,0.00028426584,0.09204002,0.90388334,0.000025877725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032107662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064258456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032107662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032479262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004738084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089481294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211088897","doi":"","title":"The Reasonable Person: A Conceptual Biography in Comparative Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reasonable person; Law; Tort; Skepticism; Comparative law; Private law; Criminal law; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023740254445170018,"score_gpt":0.3239102165118101,"score_spread":0.3001699620666401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211088897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016507499,0.120459676,0.014408943,0.082147986,0.0011347597,0.00004139429,0.00013710305,0.000037427526,0.7651252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88550264,0.049639832,0.006668944,0.016710823,0.002572581,0.00024813792,0.00021788481,0.00018507872,0.038254075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582505,0.0030430087,0.00006183823,0.00039114404,0.0003581202,0.00032079956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997081,0.0021808767,0.00018049273,0.00014190823,0.00021411385,0.00020160226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038753373,0.00067668967,0.000628361,0.004192976,0.008346933,0.00931663,0.001704802,0.004615378,0.009019947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047650672,0.00026306522,0.000448688,0.005610653,0.039084982,0.011688696,0.0033765754,0.0053205793,0.0010002357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023295775,0.0000044494045,0.000045275716,0.00002237091,0.000001302912,0.000027607028,0.0049255323,0.0000322232,0.000012546274,0.9909813,0.0026876214,0.0012573764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007473157,0.000022611512,0.00054879335,0.0005373858,0.000007738108,0.00017477195,0.017859923,0.000358558,0.00005403015,0.64579546,0.33461928,0.000013919006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011776799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007947354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147015825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0147015825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027442623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106667936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111865073","doi":"","title":"From Foundations to Finish? The Continuing Duty Doctrine and Limitations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Doctrine; Watson; Statutory law; Appeal; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02266798070662438,"score_gpt":0.29965185991891025,"score_spread":0.27698387921228584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111865073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037258923,0.0066550286,0.08623092,0.12933615,0.0009290008,0.000100462436,0.00015608587,0.00014188218,0.7391915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8723174,0.0026702606,0.01718786,0.021456776,0.00062554993,0.0002593368,0.000112913905,0.00015525617,0.08521458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339855,0.0018864832,0.00026779991,0.0013121497,0.0020709988,0.0010641039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931704,0.0037661474,0.00045944925,0.0011641122,0.0010323663,0.00040744932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077890484,0.00049555366,0.0005911004,0.0009958408,0.007509316,0.010254243,0.0029659858,0.011245595,0.008081829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01898477,0.0006476806,0.0006705655,0.0008561332,0.02805853,0.025780912,0.0074261646,0.014504151,0.001524366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022216839,0.0000021081717,0.00003383071,0.0000040579607,3.592321e-7,0.000020703921,0.0005997827,0.000030435722,0.000016556709,0.9967526,0.001127047,0.0014103183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071067075,0.000017913859,0.00013285785,0.00012099925,0.0000029212463,0.00007765865,0.0012130706,0.00024841644,0.00012621615,0.91993475,0.07810351,0.000014598503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016263189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014315873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016263189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067389645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00795412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048894823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112539498","doi":"","title":"Calculating Judgment Interest After Bank of America Canada v. Mutual Trust Co.: Difficulties Compounded","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Restitution; Law; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Creditor; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Debt","score_opus":0.04295107980467761,"score_gpt":0.3259100329100433,"score_spread":0.2829589531053657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112539498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27188691,0.0031900557,0.016501425,0.038026977,0.0011967194,0.00069900247,0.0015358247,0.0002226214,0.6667405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87377965,0.000755155,0.00420438,0.0072189323,0.00024147554,0.00012713125,0.0003034586,0.00006516455,0.1133047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98301333,0.0014168294,0.0006849207,0.0021247356,0.0081431065,0.0046170456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909657,0.003271478,0.00047759415,0.00054640137,0.003956713,0.0007820511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007899503,0.00058583554,0.0008014304,0.0021599177,0.011651616,0.012042325,0.002542777,0.010411399,0.0065572876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02299842,0.0008473207,0.00080279313,0.0024189234,0.0057240394,0.0053173625,0.0035067364,0.009320649,0.00080750353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016153207,0.00007015325,0.009669656,0.00008040018,0.0000622378,0.00290154,0.009954644,0.0010404825,0.0014668825,0.89318436,0.05315786,0.028250173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018155707,0.0005745388,0.050505344,0.00054737745,0.00042796115,0.0018755341,0.015893072,0.008675641,0.013932567,0.24519266,0.6614469,0.00074688054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6684797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8398917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33152032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041583918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043425094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6669454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113105916","doi":"","title":"The Charter and Administrative Law: Cross-Fertilization or Inconstancy?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Administrative law; Agency (philosophy); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.023738735050630427,"score_gpt":0.34684056921444884,"score_spread":0.32310183416381844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113105916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01445011,0.07130957,0.030519467,0.2015481,0.003918986,0.000056444715,0.000107903725,0.00012774438,0.67796165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.811183,0.05354698,0.011861877,0.042991344,0.0050204224,0.00015910082,0.00013926631,0.00024816112,0.07484985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812634,0.0054259384,0.00042809529,0.0020224731,0.00745904,0.0034009912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991835,0.003843365,0.0006133623,0.0009910099,0.0022363185,0.00048086504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011087333,0.00069165824,0.0012527967,0.0035674446,0.011857667,0.023594344,0.0034606662,0.006199353,0.010196283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019258328,0.00063964666,0.00070846756,0.007009641,0.08281487,0.021686997,0.009157824,0.013576108,0.0011700161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015095359,0.000002239538,0.000045512345,0.000009968507,0.0000010967151,0.000013629804,0.0012847745,0.000031458807,0.00000921967,0.99288553,0.0015318717,0.0041832603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009118213,0.000018210627,0.0011808153,0.00054731796,0.000011447484,0.000087967215,0.006902058,0.00031058327,0.00012238583,0.69352347,0.29724252,0.00004418433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3646775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32760176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3646775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038740933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043133426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7251097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113299159","doi":"10.1017/s0008197313000482","title":"WINNERS AND LOSERS: <i>EDWARDS</i> AND THE UNFAIR LAW OF DISMISSAL","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Statutory law; Dismissal; Law; Common law; Statute; Political science; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Unfair dismissal; Discipline","score_opus":0.009136205729693987,"score_gpt":0.2503988532783828,"score_spread":0.2412626475486888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113299159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29303402,0.0035669138,0.0051990207,0.25960064,0.0012895168,0.000046083285,0.000068473084,0.000025211519,0.43717006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839755,0.00026059538,0.00019116544,0.005816011,0.0002468689,0.000010236717,0.000006185785,0.000008804628,0.009484582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851334,0.005528382,0.00073970336,0.001699986,0.003564393,0.0033339993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98688185,0.008339968,0.00145291,0.0007147665,0.0012412628,0.0013692633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014194969,0.00021889163,0.00061004434,0.0013982021,0.010223722,0.0115442285,0.0017748855,0.012476045,0.008178537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031518776,0.00041623748,0.00048462173,0.0008525167,0.03561233,0.0062299953,0.006833495,0.012580571,0.0006129293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030684147,0.000021951275,0.0015072316,0.000011617147,0.000006125702,0.0006199855,0.005354407,0.00010092387,0.000120450364,0.9807792,0.0083269905,0.003120429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080455364,0.00010268537,0.007918099,0.00041620308,0.000045475666,0.0012856303,0.027547415,0.0020615035,0.0005925201,0.85927546,0.10049634,0.00017830715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038739063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050424676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038739063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00978919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067754416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07702714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115506377","doi":"","title":"NEWFOUNDLAND CAPITAL CORPORATION LIMITED","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Capital (architecture); Business; Finance; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.03411815712247086,"score_gpt":0.3009563213323683,"score_spread":0.2668381642098975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115506377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030428383,0.0019266895,0.00042970479,0.0038569914,0.0003792327,0.00005759577,0.0014893224,0.0002881585,0.9885295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030679884,0.000377759,0.00015329158,0.00028198803,0.000025750842,0.0000092997625,0.00029815844,0.000024292953,0.99576145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853885,0.00006968943,0.00006842649,0.00022503854,0.0007567086,0.00034129006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674976,0.0005618838,0.00021760342,0.0004988679,0.0014959322,0.0004760213],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090842,0.0006782871,0.00063103926,0.0025980708,0.004533596,0.0072847274,0.00092523155,0.0030111207,0.30013716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003079132,0.0007605604,0.00040856976,0.0020027165,0.0012970157,0.0031704246,0.0014673218,0.0027784691,0.08878313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007994808,0.00008815836,0.0018096162,0.00015986392,0.000013622259,0.00038678863,0.00036304948,0.00022761105,0.0006232979,0.067226544,0.81633544,0.11268618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008831975,0.000011890572,0.0023882727,0.00012800125,0.000011002132,0.00007892044,0.00012659856,0.000095337055,0.00024094812,0.0012163521,0.99568534,0.000008514056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32002154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.606288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69986284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010712879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014739489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116210297","doi":"10.1177/0309089206068841","title":"Safekeeping, Borrowing, and Rental","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Study of the Old Testament","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tyndale University","funders":"","keywords":"Renting; Payment; Law; Property (philosophy); Old Testament; Business; History; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Finance; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025360825533356796,"score_gpt":0.32593501364986655,"score_spread":0.30057418811650977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116210297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074649006,0.0074872375,0.0058063115,0.010550413,0.00026414622,0.000033542732,0.00014746028,0.00004437795,0.9010175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8926188,0.0036631878,0.0014282959,0.0021579731,0.00030997308,0.00005324897,0.00009040324,0.00001991593,0.09965835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796873,0.00047582886,0.0001638915,0.00033518436,0.00069936406,0.00035685394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882776,0.00035328633,0.0003078014,0.00019965932,0.00019587077,0.000115621304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013070232,0.00024508446,0.00025281144,0.0010023315,0.0039398656,0.0042019747,0.00058598234,0.0017987714,0.006143252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026165347,0.0002467033,0.00018165629,0.0013131109,0.026697151,0.0036031252,0.002772327,0.0016606062,0.00073869637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004819284,0.000006404394,0.00055387715,0.000013914506,0.0000019094887,0.000040120143,0.0021435113,0.0000700398,0.00003118374,0.9901086,0.0018838306,0.005141879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001884952,0.00004249053,0.011883069,0.00026167234,0.000012752788,0.00041616368,0.0036590425,0.00028836878,0.00040183574,0.5028477,0.48013365,0.000034332126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015091583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022187948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015091583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029008246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029951518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030007482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116463512","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2061558","title":"Contributory Qualifying and Non-Qualifying Triggers in the Loss of Control Defence: A Wrong Turn on Sexual Infidelity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Control (management); Social psychology; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0233145791781004,"score_gpt":0.3346505977495845,"score_spread":0.3113360185714841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116463512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7262983,0.0009946176,0.016431697,0.027185999,0.00044002748,0.00011761671,0.00009909119,0.000060435734,0.22837232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951244,0.00012010073,0.00047722706,0.0005058865,0.00009271023,0.000014724152,0.000009025776,0.00002125637,0.0036345932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959596,0.0015641506,0.0001518008,0.00051339524,0.0006904641,0.0011205382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859681,0.009461137,0.0012677616,0.0017089265,0.000699763,0.0008942456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005511025,0.00033471515,0.00075939763,0.0011900392,0.0046831383,0.005408413,0.0012935885,0.0065814955,0.015076734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03225009,0.0006289108,0.00051714847,0.00068706926,0.010329347,0.005746946,0.0046200813,0.0060177688,0.00062867405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036461378,0.00013347356,0.018038038,0.00005073129,0.000021953969,0.0033550693,0.019905193,0.0005461821,0.0007946145,0.93619514,0.002696442,0.017898584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017433894,0.00018741639,0.028909914,0.00029309292,0.00010856204,0.0034024238,0.03475793,0.004156131,0.0013438559,0.90863794,0.017923122,0.000105304156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006274316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006011241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015076734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002057539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002441248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050436676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117125021","doi":"","title":"Report on the Uniform Civil Enforcement of Money Judgments Act","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Enforcement; Payment; Order (exchange); Law; Civil procedure; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.01887631623103462,"score_gpt":0.3007995505602473,"score_spread":0.2819232343292127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117125021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008450691,0.0039883833,0.0053470246,0.08138405,0.007983536,0.0035113913,0.02195233,0.0015641652,0.8658184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0698046,0.0054754894,0.018107062,0.07744714,0.003227044,0.007644137,0.027070623,0.0006404781,0.7905834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94898736,0.0071693766,0.002603694,0.001810451,0.03238462,0.0070445645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9615709,0.008541734,0.0018982779,0.003571492,0.0214721,0.0029455242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0272541,0.0012003039,0.0013211067,0.0039430014,0.005312334,0.010626235,0.0041687023,0.012225326,0.030402271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06657196,0.0012314445,0.0011762466,0.003611858,0.002314556,0.0031378232,0.0045191296,0.0108336955,0.020234168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069963186,0.00017372756,0.0012130685,0.0001261128,0.000016913404,0.00016181811,0.00041980372,0.00053358363,0.00025931955,0.14443035,0.8245692,0.028026138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035505847,0.00005567994,0.005092431,0.00027326765,0.000023613025,0.000051109942,0.00036002803,0.0003489864,0.00038172002,0.003413197,0.98990077,0.000063677275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35538998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22311653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35538998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016221177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09661258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70664275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117166695","doi":"","title":"Personal Property Law and Information Assets: Rehabilitation and Relevance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tangible property; Personal property; Intangible property; Relevance (law); Commodification; Statutory law; Property (philosophy); Property law; Law and economics; Business; Real property; Intellectual property; Law; Property rights; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.009333909641101179,"score_gpt":0.25114348461596775,"score_spread":0.24180957497486658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117166695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030111501,0.0825496,0.037207417,0.2689872,0.0015458848,0.00012914374,0.00006762361,0.00012612397,0.57927555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9084224,0.028971815,0.008965425,0.021369949,0.0035774542,0.00021527807,0.000056902772,0.000060918937,0.028359786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919093,0.0042248606,0.0003515483,0.0007185482,0.0020178733,0.0007778096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823329,0.01225966,0.0012913523,0.0018367624,0.001539308,0.0007400272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007167562,0.0004902065,0.0010268125,0.0032792545,0.0053073396,0.011629891,0.0021609992,0.01041794,0.00961856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016520923,0.00032712118,0.0007113541,0.0037189745,0.08462032,0.023308093,0.0072160065,0.008899621,0.0008403839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021501216,0.000008828834,0.0001047529,0.00003410088,0.0000014218053,0.00005717356,0.0006511042,0.000094784125,0.000018516843,0.9931607,0.0010771669,0.0047892462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004584626,0.000011511744,0.00027939916,0.00022210118,0.0000031840018,0.00019386149,0.001406516,0.00025632218,0.00006406263,0.95872545,0.038823694,0.0000093160415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042057354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003743156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011629891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009622994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009138218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06981999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117427861","doi":"","title":"Dementia, Decision-Making, and the Modern (Adult) Guardianship Paradigm: Bentley v Maplewood Seniors Care Society","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Dementia; Autonomy; Stewardship (theology); Ideal (ethics); Set (abstract data type); Meaning (existential); Prudence; Psychology; Gerontology; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Disease; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.005512030270301879,"score_gpt":0.2679494544486018,"score_spread":0.2624374241782999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117427861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1686624,0.01778304,0.00770242,0.2644458,0.0010982916,0.00004265259,0.000041191233,0.000033529366,0.54019076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759513,0.0015522842,0.0008265446,0.013357206,0.00023693492,0.000021568283,0.000005877364,0.000005585471,0.008042584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958832,0.0025552316,0.00012128827,0.00025898678,0.00057627534,0.0006049972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981395,0.00089124916,0.00022311667,0.00014997942,0.00021236064,0.00038377452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005470162,0.00024895038,0.00026924416,0.0008546184,0.008473025,0.0056944187,0.0010256594,0.004529606,0.0022379647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042615216,0.00018460264,0.0002202409,0.00064556155,0.053462006,0.0048812903,0.005221624,0.00572683,0.00023166787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045639545,0.0000075134594,0.00019082816,0.000007786474,7.203698e-7,0.000117515374,0.014950146,0.000031282263,0.000016485477,0.9810346,0.0015827115,0.002055801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001918533,0.000043558866,0.0007623214,0.00022550217,0.000004820756,0.00065892,0.02756594,0.0002350767,0.00011534506,0.77367055,0.1966694,0.000029428376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015930189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016202673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067740455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055146245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049149454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118298246","doi":"10.7202/043635ar","title":"Les rapprochements entre la société de personnes et le partnership : une étude de droit comparé canadien","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.022761012446756174,"score_gpt":0.3008082424085248,"score_spread":0.2780472299617686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118298246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32839137,0.039763104,0.0065262066,0.052461416,0.00047523173,0.00008992861,0.00023004232,0.0000347353,0.572028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567938,0.009037888,0.0008940063,0.0015454942,0.000084258965,0.000065223016,0.000043922246,0.000019444782,0.031516008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940705,0.003528595,0.000089350404,0.0003927144,0.0009881741,0.0009306238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544984,0.0028007345,0.00032095928,0.00018746116,0.000739566,0.0005014437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042217276,0.00031826342,0.0005910525,0.004475039,0.017187627,0.01206418,0.0012086338,0.0024623687,0.009897998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072857556,0.00022880384,0.00030527584,0.010681159,0.021016752,0.007215053,0.0081473,0.0032556972,0.0004611841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001625482,0.000022453503,0.0043157646,0.00015173291,0.00001165498,0.00029417724,0.3324901,0.00021292566,0.00007578853,0.6316465,0.0037867678,0.02697592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005927479,0.000035186884,0.018115288,0.0008054777,0.000023537521,0.0002910672,0.6328883,0.00037914814,0.00015403292,0.062803715,0.28444842,0.00004986844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40501598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5649449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59498405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025117118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02062575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80531704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118854655","doi":"","title":"Simplifying Claims to Traceable Proceeds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Settlor; Trust law; Law and economics; Business; Property law; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Property rights; Economics; Restitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08946151875835523,"score_gpt":0.4285776937241007,"score_spread":0.3391161749657455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118854655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18157454,0.0018002636,0.33202487,0.017381204,0.0005270502,0.00044040117,0.00039363207,0.0006209201,0.46523714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045425,0.0012118558,0.047933917,0.0017583532,0.00058004964,0.00024431333,0.00027968938,0.00021121367,0.043238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864093,0.0035319214,0.00087384507,0.0024445616,0.0055509657,0.0011895046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630868,0.019727113,0.0019060888,0.012537154,0.0022702338,0.00047266422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013550856,0.0010214662,0.0011595434,0.0033740846,0.0040315203,0.012093199,0.0053743063,0.008612657,0.014950063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061211742,0.0011575475,0.0031582038,0.0021211386,0.019994821,0.030190904,0.015348664,0.009648795,0.0026532398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013688683,0.00001533004,0.00017493447,0.000020943695,0.000007647975,0.000282319,0.00057104323,0.0009855443,0.00026036886,0.99465394,0.00041687017,0.002597413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018435949,0.000017703862,0.00012625699,0.000053891996,0.000026206415,0.00018387566,0.00017740647,0.0036614505,0.0009017542,0.9832081,0.011607797,0.000016974162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040359516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022343558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014950063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005853539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027295009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07166469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119769935","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1027","title":"Harm and Fault in Discrimination Law: The Transition from Intentional to Adverse Effect Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Statute; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Employment discrimination; Liability; Harm; Malice; Political science; Jurisdiction; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02107537109339203,"score_gpt":0.3369209354750022,"score_spread":0.31584556438161016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119769935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124397315,0.022376295,0.13168566,0.20286646,0.0024620148,0.00012601986,0.00007090234,0.00014691487,0.51586837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700528,0.0036733695,0.006032156,0.009751629,0.0012604692,0.00007229197,0.000014959635,0.000043872144,0.009098482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029994,0.0035937412,0.00042884008,0.0008867492,0.0035453886,0.0012453577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235934,0.0055038454,0.00049217086,0.0006445059,0.00060827006,0.00039186515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007902748,0.00041799762,0.00064574374,0.001792154,0.0054915138,0.009200585,0.0016460646,0.010269203,0.0019489161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015419796,0.00039749226,0.000864481,0.000901664,0.06880342,0.01779581,0.008042442,0.014318652,0.000295798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023736582,0.0000052860255,0.00009982174,0.000006824837,4.3268318e-7,0.00005726444,0.0012606843,0.00008098672,0.0000350447,0.9965301,0.00022761751,0.0016936639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050951126,0.000021987296,0.00029655063,0.000079757774,0.0000026490002,0.00014516861,0.00096208765,0.00050016347,0.000104921135,0.9825984,0.015269939,0.000013203723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062996615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003852894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010269203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007082851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004575686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051389933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119809","doi":"10.1016/0167-4781(90)90155-u","title":"Torts, Rights, and Right-Wing Ideology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Ideology; Law; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.017556921141853987,"score_gpt":0.2716415333129409,"score_spread":0.2540846121710869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018895041,0.0015200274,0.008897526,0.012334123,0.00036404317,0.000026801868,0.00013824704,0.00006767097,0.9577565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8398263,0.0011961401,0.0033408224,0.0035855589,0.0004885117,0.000066756955,0.00010400856,0.00006689671,0.15132491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746275,0.0008516982,0.00012737268,0.00041953629,0.00072152866,0.00041711432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984775,0.0005395126,0.0002108035,0.0003537918,0.00024054917,0.00017779475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023334136,0.00023275806,0.00028148122,0.0007755262,0.0035470442,0.0043369695,0.0004305959,0.002271547,0.022561392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004816605,0.00017125756,0.00026341935,0.000665952,0.013053223,0.0032196443,0.0033667227,0.0029043672,0.0025215668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003815464,0.000003130068,0.00019564222,0.000003921397,0.0000011924405,0.000029925037,0.0002825172,0.000050332652,0.000047822403,0.9936837,0.002608623,0.0030894005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001311244,0.000021586722,0.0013257671,0.00006354209,0.0000076059387,0.00033501018,0.00071304565,0.0004576781,0.00028400728,0.75353485,0.2432287,0.000015110672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00405752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005289494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022561392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019433385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017194649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075475395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119829461","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttu224","title":"Recent US developments in estate and trust law and taxation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.01759570477433455,"score_gpt":0.2895511487818407,"score_spread":0.27195544400750615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119829461","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01736268,0.46393955,0.002289315,0.26686892,0.004703733,0.000016446442,0.001165766,0.0000955975,0.24355802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31619838,0.54862803,0.005146795,0.04315179,0.0060959095,0.000045672627,0.0016463674,0.000118884534,0.07896817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975938,0.0006355012,0.00021279135,0.0001587452,0.0010764983,0.0003226638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934523,0.0028463642,0.0008660215,0.00019862893,0.0022162518,0.00042029642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026090515,0.00025349934,0.0002887804,0.0034639272,0.0018967973,0.007011583,0.00043060037,0.002468584,0.009499639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01057456,0.00025440613,0.0004814386,0.015460693,0.0027465457,0.005160676,0.0017006627,0.0029493342,0.00082262856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052736566,0.000050093615,0.00467342,0.0004429978,0.000019920506,0.00015811293,0.0017935204,0.00044850472,0.00016861994,0.6437881,0.2192553,0.12914865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024277856,0.000013474527,0.007191204,0.00040795218,0.000015356318,0.00017455546,0.0009102757,0.00018010606,0.00016658359,0.02335716,0.9675643,0.000016744327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10465965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20774402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10465965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012966131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010118555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20810091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123071053","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0005","title":"Constructive Trusts from a Law and Economics Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Plaintiff; Unjust enrichment; Express trust; Damages; Law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Wrongdoing; Sociology; Political science; Business; Computer science; Restitution","score_opus":0.009137035967406807,"score_gpt":0.23603158689937292,"score_spread":0.22689455093196612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123071053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02384256,0.01763916,0.046207253,0.08677401,0.0005917892,0.000078909135,0.00021250108,0.00008880093,0.8245652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93149096,0.0077100853,0.004459932,0.004379026,0.0015928834,0.00010758911,0.000055519307,0.000030502715,0.0501735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978678,0.00090869144,0.00007123404,0.0002023429,0.0006553384,0.000294597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954145,0.0029611394,0.0004647291,0.00023665845,0.00064563804,0.0002773131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019572284,0.00038098946,0.00037524768,0.0020179814,0.0020943964,0.00798299,0.001177418,0.0049648453,0.0108532645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005298607,0.00034272773,0.00062035106,0.0013503253,0.012747246,0.0092791235,0.001674071,0.004051566,0.0006832715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.909727e-7,0.0000027950882,0.000030208323,0.000006838031,0.000001005239,0.000017386585,0.00003267984,0.00028018648,0.000008904332,0.99804926,0.00087584043,0.0006939335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024556894,0.0000051994875,0.00009271144,0.00004474672,0.0000020101077,0.000028259541,0.00008476484,0.0010564267,0.000024696505,0.9842296,0.014424212,0.000004893474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070472755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003776149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01319263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01319263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031899107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095719695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123460060","doi":"10.5287/ora-o0ok8rqbx","title":"Compensation claims against trustees","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goldcorp; Nuclear Safety and Security Commission; BC Cancer Agency; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Damages; Tort; Breach of contract; Law and economics; Law; Subject (documents); Business; Political science; Economics; Liability; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.044287025085250294,"score_gpt":0.3018881921598746,"score_spread":0.2576011670746243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123460060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12738498,0.0078903455,0.029331977,0.039511573,0.0010945263,0.0002060782,0.0001741787,0.00015690316,0.7942493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91837883,0.0017668279,0.0019160279,0.0042787828,0.0006792665,0.00009828158,0.00005163708,0.000037221922,0.072793104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693284,0.0078839725,0.0024313543,0.002726367,0.012362017,0.00526789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97737736,0.010013239,0.0033810835,0.0032626127,0.00501111,0.0009546866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015990514,0.0005460334,0.00088014494,0.0026746031,0.008317092,0.01168397,0.0019504488,0.010440391,0.011700572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052404296,0.00049220887,0.0014093382,0.0019051072,0.010523235,0.008989238,0.009724328,0.0067885523,0.0015729541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031620777,0.000018334855,0.001479296,0.00004801197,0.000026325906,0.00048401643,0.003788392,0.0002098201,0.00021094405,0.9785891,0.005575981,0.009538154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008953576,0.00017433584,0.004969401,0.0010098357,0.00023425024,0.0028452491,0.006999933,0.0030325728,0.0026773093,0.58961236,0.38816303,0.00019218247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007952028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004509523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015990514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049448055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052423542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08456689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123524410","doi":"10.1017/s1352325212000249","title":"LEGAL OBLIGATION AND REASONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Action (physics); Legal positivism; Philosophy of law; Positivism; Political science; Legal profession; Legal realism; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Physics","score_opus":0.012615956732833465,"score_gpt":0.28259888142952067,"score_spread":0.2699829246966872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123524410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010025799,0.00825341,0.027962599,0.061740864,0.00082764815,0.00007327966,0.00011240968,0.000087674416,0.89091635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91149944,0.004265199,0.009375155,0.01463961,0.0013622855,0.0002171424,0.00015283094,0.00011124892,0.058377028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99000645,0.0041313195,0.00051929586,0.0016571463,0.0023388683,0.0013469068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98914015,0.006144153,0.0008741455,0.0013988682,0.0015901732,0.00085251464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009494323,0.00051324884,0.0007277716,0.002014927,0.0065472806,0.008670652,0.0015384502,0.007423466,0.011816366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015826114,0.00039836267,0.00072919886,0.0011125061,0.050564166,0.014054725,0.006856072,0.0069873235,0.0017881893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013112029,0.0000028498553,0.00003874105,0.000006189748,8.0869813e-7,0.000009714957,0.0004335603,0.000022715818,0.000007838429,0.9975593,0.0009088169,0.0010080448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000832495,0.000005588371,0.00012455223,0.000080757505,0.0000024309052,0.00004745524,0.0005211419,0.00010236099,0.000038115253,0.9355305,0.06353091,0.000007827184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006015459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037032308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011816366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061333496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006664637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05021137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124619597","doi":"10.7202/042695ar","title":"Effectivité et ineffectivité des décisions de justice en matière matrimoniale : un exemple d'ineffectivité totale, le non-paiement de pensions alimentaires","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Law enforcement; Political science; Law; Welfare economics; Business; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.009228106882124675,"score_gpt":0.2928766248989329,"score_spread":0.28364851801680824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124619597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43732053,0.009395864,0.040673114,0.029643627,0.00024700232,0.00037607117,0.00065718207,0.0001380901,0.4815484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96563894,0.0017302189,0.003994825,0.0010337027,0.00009748064,0.000090125446,0.000037105197,0.00002066626,0.027356869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892518,0.0048386552,0.00037162582,0.00049660105,0.0035627936,0.0014784709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779798,0.015999967,0.0026773892,0.00083063595,0.0021173703,0.0003948978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010015363,0.000541719,0.0006104946,0.001741825,0.0029149405,0.005638745,0.0014783314,0.0022309122,0.006208652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018658523,0.00025512144,0.0006488251,0.0017118346,0.010390673,0.0017874441,0.0021663308,0.0020294269,0.0002271356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009041598,0.00015006594,0.013214157,0.00026030876,0.00012288391,0.00045798838,0.0050311843,0.00784904,0.00068921666,0.93384206,0.0049149767,0.033377763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016466927,0.00075296924,0.09963107,0.00071490067,0.0005304635,0.0008604999,0.014099203,0.027455136,0.0058239,0.62636095,0.22340816,0.00019808518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1995286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31758127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1995286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016722454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010193686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39673442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125010651","doi":"","title":"Access or Expectation: The Test for Fiduciary Accountability","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Test (biology); Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.03360034008899149,"score_gpt":0.3850971834808357,"score_spread":0.3514968433918442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125010651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03954847,0.0028935699,0.13854684,0.26491824,0.0017733836,0.0001859544,0.00058631256,0.0002599896,0.55128723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410311,0.00072936673,0.014439672,0.024636872,0.0015270704,0.0005211525,0.0001258104,0.00011546465,0.016873356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709816,0.01275545,0.0015175898,0.0038055452,0.008319362,0.0026204314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505423,0.030799635,0.0039624944,0.0076649496,0.005021287,0.0020094546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024657348,0.00047085018,0.0015991429,0.0017083042,0.0046370653,0.007863828,0.002659096,0.012524463,0.01279736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09910481,0.00041434533,0.0015795053,0.0011335998,0.04398113,0.018824603,0.007558958,0.012255743,0.0025229873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001253824,0.000006608915,0.000109108216,0.000010233638,0.0000039600977,0.00002548835,0.00012635489,0.000066450746,0.000031988464,0.9972274,0.0012171101,0.0011627194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022038777,0.000015122651,0.00012785177,0.000048016074,0.0000055181395,0.000045844707,0.00007407012,0.0003897324,0.000111241745,0.990961,0.008187689,0.000011831051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030722136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013688665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024657348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043345755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075650057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13040209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126560075","doi":"","title":"The Promise of Certainty in the Law of Pre-Incorporation Contracts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Relation (database); Law; Limited liability; Third party; Certainty; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.023439967679636756,"score_gpt":0.30123575604614244,"score_spread":0.2777957883665057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126560075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03407163,0.0102253305,0.26581624,0.13196057,0.0014841262,0.00027454438,0.00033656877,0.00025534353,0.55557567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9193056,0.0030971307,0.03353347,0.012908435,0.0019325583,0.00039617097,0.0000897478,0.00012261959,0.02861421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9656317,0.013008053,0.0024887323,0.006618451,0.009406495,0.0028465698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468799,0.0326192,0.004420938,0.0091991,0.005101578,0.0017792124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04224206,0.00079860166,0.0016360655,0.0014711028,0.00861378,0.01673581,0.003987084,0.016154418,0.0070805675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08594423,0.0017384291,0.0022591366,0.0014234979,0.046179753,0.03612836,0.01009082,0.022178447,0.0016129453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006747108,0.0000044981107,0.000062692976,0.000013126082,0.0000042576294,0.000032121556,0.0002732111,0.00017021789,0.000028858783,0.99783784,0.0004429322,0.0011234456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016525955,0.000016482638,0.00007088767,0.00006359805,0.000008564147,0.000056272245,0.000113553666,0.000508764,0.000120112156,0.9855136,0.013493747,0.000017831468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007944399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041307164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04224206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008107278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009263387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22340006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127919043","doi":"","title":"ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF CITATION OF AUTHORITY ON THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Citation; Law; Common law; Legal citation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; State (computer science); Certiorari; Precedent; Original jurisdiction; Comparative law; History; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.23178099521127693,"score_gpt":0.3829338067663177,"score_spread":0.1511528115550408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127919043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5033616,0.09700343,0.0031210254,0.025927119,0.006629163,0.0002387351,0.0023071484,0.00012066795,0.36129123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8016879,0.052924518,0.0027961605,0.005522424,0.0017681659,0.000117943455,0.0016155472,0.00011481523,0.13345243],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884255,0.002427749,0.0017934925,0.00072887575,0.006194493,0.00042989626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93272316,0.03729182,0.0056256484,0.0029462,0.020160919,0.0012523105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060283425,0.00020098692,0.00036046153,0.019158512,0.00417982,0.0034241192,0.00088010635,0.0015763921,0.0033482015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06748668,0.000492625,0.0003104382,0.016789677,0.003401248,0.0027443576,0.0029540367,0.0019275958,0.0010343554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021008117,0.00013157142,0.059994508,0.004215816,0.00021386721,0.0074082017,0.1215769,0.0008713978,0.0049154363,0.11554579,0.12643698,0.5584794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011380311,0.00010873185,0.24059416,0.003474795,0.00007730476,0.0018089013,0.015583134,0.0005434939,0.0021311312,0.006253996,0.7292231,0.00018987057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12682207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35560066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12682207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008344739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008261661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25216776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128352995","doi":"10.1017/s000819730600715x","title":"A RE-APPRAISAL OF THE FIDUCIARY SELF-DEALING AND FAIR-DEALING RULES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Fiduciary; Database transaction; Law and economics; Business; Trust law; Settlor; Property (philosophy); Law; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance; Computer science; Philosophy; Database","score_opus":0.015555272777650881,"score_gpt":0.29165674806820563,"score_spread":0.27610147529055473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128352995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023066912,0.022836985,0.04481103,0.32508433,0.008029734,0.0001732261,0.0002509488,0.00010585837,0.575641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7436791,0.010065892,0.021014052,0.1500349,0.010698611,0.0005400953,0.00019037038,0.00026047582,0.06351658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95823884,0.011053015,0.0027831153,0.0050288625,0.018902378,0.003993737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96292853,0.021804035,0.0017454006,0.004710565,0.0074917953,0.0013197012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03446482,0.00072661013,0.0012646605,0.0024339512,0.008267656,0.013446422,0.0056047877,0.016871357,0.003288683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06633442,0.0007872487,0.0019078745,0.0015903687,0.043105885,0.019079285,0.0065800054,0.03228775,0.00090793974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047773333,0.000005129463,0.00005602663,0.000013112765,0.0000022530594,0.000025094037,0.00047053772,0.00006702869,0.0000138984,0.99181306,0.00573829,0.0017909554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019253554,0.000022379032,0.00058657455,0.00039691795,0.000016353033,0.00010491488,0.00092471414,0.00082266604,0.00021147073,0.84782016,0.14903493,0.000039765295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029504221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021412209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03446482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009949581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015953716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18226957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133624854","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Role of Precedent and the Doctrine of Stare Decisis in Trial and Intermediate Appellate Level Charter Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Doctrine; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03883818339344456,"score_gpt":0.33207330233573684,"score_spread":0.29323511894229226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133624854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17366943,0.005354905,0.1924624,0.060376555,0.00085197703,0.00038695364,0.00027070494,0.00012643321,0.56650066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96638227,0.0009244735,0.018524034,0.0025841976,0.00023705319,0.00010252002,0.000048141028,0.000032315023,0.011164975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847948,0.0068419212,0.00080461684,0.0014800058,0.0037071793,0.0023714658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97972655,0.013946675,0.0017995222,0.001639154,0.0021098058,0.0007782473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021177808,0.00027302734,0.00070589484,0.0026881502,0.008929106,0.017664218,0.0027924958,0.005964593,0.003100108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03105376,0.00052372477,0.0009499286,0.0025015562,0.037327025,0.01259167,0.0061237444,0.010880409,0.00033549833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025674685,0.0000032508447,0.00020177661,0.0000067848337,9.796094e-7,0.00009480974,0.0013126937,0.00021534879,0.000025689935,0.9967372,0.00029930598,0.0010996605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018805893,0.00002993406,0.0015903265,0.00026350352,0.000019029712,0.00013528265,0.0049401377,0.0032587764,0.00031503156,0.95607936,0.033299383,0.00005032445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073695995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11645102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073695995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014181096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026992366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14653409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137015572","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000158","title":"COHABITANTS IN PRIVATE LAW: TRUST, FRUSTRATION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN ENGLAND, GERMANY AND CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Appeal; Law; Political science; Autonomy; Legislature; German; Common law; Private law; Comparative law; Geography","score_opus":0.021783605680763075,"score_gpt":0.28599774731631056,"score_spread":0.26421414163554746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137015572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88882166,0.0030879213,0.0003480341,0.031729303,0.00015306397,0.000080752034,0.00020457199,0.000018117118,0.0755566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901286,0.0006059467,0.00007963633,0.0022829294,0.000009612934,0.000011643627,0.00003414044,0.000007930508,0.0068395752],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98851854,0.0016538567,0.00027914037,0.00079142203,0.0030136437,0.0057433383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873553,0.0041831015,0.00095636107,0.0004429274,0.002812713,0.0042496244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00555537,0.00023062126,0.00061968894,0.0019834237,0.03502003,0.00986684,0.0026738462,0.0042138067,0.0069688265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01599663,0.0004090093,0.00029348614,0.0035160666,0.021290824,0.002691512,0.0054311194,0.005577687,0.00027580847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021759921,0.0002712372,0.060813114,0.00022890104,0.00007529565,0.0051944335,0.44938973,0.00067834655,0.000999514,0.39153558,0.04753648,0.043059774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066360764,0.000056608704,0.10826244,0.0006599978,0.000063545536,0.0007332907,0.66141534,0.0011010548,0.00073788775,0.012205537,0.21446316,0.00023478326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13484344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13484344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11913405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9783622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137437015","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12087","title":"Tort Law for Cynics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Idealism; Damages; Cynicism; Context (archaeology); Law; Duty of care; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Liability","score_opus":0.05530293285794409,"score_gpt":0.372401103392749,"score_spread":0.31709817053480494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137437015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059793335,0.058741648,0.004748184,0.8450689,0.0047064684,0.000024416322,0.000032193697,0.00006243357,0.08063641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3783928,0.04040747,0.0047608786,0.50534606,0.023473993,0.00021621006,0.000071166454,0.00019498984,0.04713649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98796415,0.0060484475,0.00042442532,0.0011181488,0.0036020854,0.0008426052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97766715,0.015415443,0.0018397124,0.0011648117,0.0029000125,0.0010128237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011700038,0.0005791313,0.0010035153,0.0034084872,0.0054648644,0.008891922,0.0013652849,0.008942226,0.006581917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025466297,0.00029311085,0.0008438616,0.0014881372,0.026701475,0.010697572,0.00556369,0.016636543,0.0017680909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014082373,0.0000328667,0.00035328697,0.00017464823,0.00001425699,0.00010189512,0.0042519676,0.00012679854,0.000112923226,0.884606,0.09187224,0.018338993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016324135,0.00002765191,0.000668453,0.00071047107,0.00000941385,0.00015689617,0.0020314942,0.00026670872,0.00009424176,0.62677044,0.369233,0.000014859922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017396118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017586708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011700038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061332765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00460768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061876416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138582686","doi":"","title":"Report on Creditor Access to the Assets of a Purpose Trust","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Creditor; Legislation; Fiduciary; Blind trust; Business; Work (physics); Political science; Debt; Duty; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.024477817227177703,"score_gpt":0.34915818706298285,"score_spread":0.32468036983580517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138582686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08908371,0.0043446976,0.0017860606,0.029566433,0.003104349,0.0010564645,0.03820084,0.0006036167,0.8322539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20942989,0.008282304,0.0010649887,0.0033208532,0.0009961111,0.0004967851,0.021723142,0.00030014815,0.75438577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936265,0.00037227757,0.00024535094,0.00020133801,0.004173518,0.0013810833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98372597,0.0019428246,0.0010963918,0.001012624,0.0089022415,0.00331994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037057193,0.00027247836,0.00025059067,0.0029845694,0.0023109645,0.006005104,0.00082717306,0.0014851021,0.06427057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013362854,0.00027526732,0.00040325467,0.0028824308,0.00042371728,0.0023302354,0.0026959225,0.001866218,0.010883586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014894581,0.00013532254,0.022491198,0.00023042619,0.000018053364,0.00064051914,0.0035140675,0.00015688619,0.00069187774,0.02047022,0.8800662,0.07143635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007797243,0.00005071318,0.030279895,0.000119685035,0.00000880511,0.00011528267,0.0036552858,0.000080119964,0.00034873892,0.0005082279,0.96479964,0.000025743286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22740173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24965899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22740173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068707634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015497856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45215625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139608255","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103622","title":"Jurisdiction and Scale: Legal `Technicalities' as Resources for Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Law; Temporality; Sociology; Political science; Jurisprudence; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Business","score_opus":0.029557900311957395,"score_gpt":0.3803226695723262,"score_spread":0.3507647692603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139608255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04062912,0.018091269,0.39512596,0.08403227,0.00092218997,0.00023837271,0.00023943385,0.00031403117,0.4604074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93743217,0.00449135,0.048105925,0.002187897,0.0006454342,0.00045431202,0.0000994307,0.00015407722,0.006429483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845889,0.010657138,0.00056914735,0.001486891,0.0019272137,0.000770694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692537,0.022864712,0.0015778238,0.0044559943,0.0012036419,0.0006440419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016986815,0.0010424803,0.0013530782,0.0065691583,0.0063836887,0.013317966,0.0032965622,0.0035794966,0.008594111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029011494,0.0009006625,0.0013310867,0.0064799506,0.11433313,0.037263814,0.012758418,0.0068511064,0.00075072557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.569535e-7,0.0000016243024,0.000041332132,0.000011780341,0.0000011970951,0.0000065341137,0.000555393,0.00009362841,0.000007790363,0.99840945,0.000104230334,0.00076623115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034694026,0.000002753177,0.000062309715,0.000031711137,0.0000018663532,0.000012276451,0.00056799507,0.00025428896,0.000015846734,0.99329007,0.005754162,0.0000032298908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036944782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00236944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016986815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008301104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004535419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08983594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139635052","doi":"","title":"L'Administration des biens d'autrui dans le code civil du Québec","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista Catalana de Dret Privat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020097637627650954,"score_gpt":0.27157841858922194,"score_spread":0.251480780961571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139635052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21214202,0.023707716,0.009999194,0.10862412,0.002952376,0.00038285603,0.0019053974,0.00052505574,0.6397612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34469342,0.0032337066,0.003251297,0.006355573,0.0003199052,0.00017721599,0.00026330346,0.00013110063,0.64157444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948159,0.0010092648,0.0001595172,0.000580353,0.0016811821,0.0017538252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995948,0.0012239518,0.00023980069,0.00027215458,0.0015381817,0.00077790587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034304452,0.0007413886,0.0006670274,0.0016871722,0.012396225,0.008918053,0.0013404927,0.006538927,0.017660959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00680427,0.00067302055,0.0007789607,0.0017048481,0.0044958247,0.0016988937,0.0019738993,0.0064006117,0.0013276696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108174,0.00011900297,0.009043571,0.00015079035,0.000045310724,0.0005970043,0.0092056645,0.0018799715,0.0015150453,0.8204025,0.10057304,0.056359947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004464843,0.000052071526,0.030056803,0.00024399301,0.000030067673,0.000111999885,0.0028188862,0.0012460749,0.00078760105,0.007735019,0.95679814,0.00007480715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96364546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96261054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063295625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063295625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11299851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45924407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141750530","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020090502.003","title":"Is the Law of Contract Seriously Defective if the Court is Unable to Award Restitutionary Damages for Breach of Contract","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Restitution; Breach of contract; Law; Tort; Punitive damages; Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.037363912579704874,"score_gpt":0.39452742976806865,"score_spread":0.35716351718836375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141750530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06334058,0.00612907,0.03696513,0.18380523,0.0029811226,0.00017992087,0.0004930716,0.00024689638,0.70585895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91653514,0.00317619,0.0069755837,0.030688478,0.0026709,0.000107523636,0.00019457449,0.000099342535,0.039552342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98332214,0.0035243728,0.0012266284,0.0030432146,0.0065603764,0.0023233227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813067,0.008823126,0.002215079,0.004366646,0.0023912485,0.00089735124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010411664,0.00029470472,0.0007542687,0.0012159252,0.0034292715,0.011586496,0.0020417569,0.011830713,0.008346885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029278738,0.0004234421,0.00066809205,0.0011718951,0.028437166,0.009496082,0.0027631551,0.0066659283,0.0017162543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000148711915,0.000017320664,0.000913913,0.000040485356,0.000013812939,0.0003393721,0.0006424573,0.00018897209,0.00025440156,0.9792382,0.009980234,0.008356028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031915453,0.000040082712,0.0015839593,0.0002605429,0.000028291573,0.0011054802,0.0007032123,0.0010009418,0.000615256,0.8596335,0.1349402,0.000056598885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078122765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005283306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011830713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047711404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008618415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05506283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142164072","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720120806.8219","title":"Safeguard by Rule of Law for the Fiduciary Construction of Chinese Capital Market","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Legislation; Business; Private law; Enforcement; Public law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.011766939626350729,"score_gpt":0.2900237269891253,"score_spread":0.2782567873627746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142164072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18011458,0.003003844,0.13074197,0.030097835,0.0005358014,0.00086966995,0.00035852235,0.00022382478,0.654054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9501207,0.0008597916,0.021155482,0.0013295527,0.0003008485,0.00032041623,0.000110371155,0.000034697714,0.02576818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940447,0.00118776,0.0005799275,0.0011358041,0.0021295222,0.0009222726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964413,0.0009935048,0.0005520566,0.00073110725,0.0010694459,0.00021254043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064272564,0.00035888166,0.00049135264,0.0021322484,0.006309119,0.0061368938,0.0010452704,0.002810986,0.0039446126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008700562,0.0004492546,0.0010531066,0.0012870224,0.018675525,0.0052115084,0.0032000516,0.004693968,0.00045288017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002386563,0.000005335057,0.00044983006,0.000010106062,0.0000026859504,0.000048622573,0.00071213447,0.00016863288,0.00008979432,0.99468565,0.0007325836,0.0030922017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000383973,0.000025798845,0.004292517,0.00010978776,0.000033185883,0.00014202824,0.0004695882,0.004946602,0.0007909839,0.9330853,0.056015886,0.00004981164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050126668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028557299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050126668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101539595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02104151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099669814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142961284","doi":"10.1093/indlaw/dwl040","title":"The Spectre of Addis in Contracts of Employment in Canada and the UK","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Notice; Jurisdiction; Remedial education; Political science; Law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.03219902094617423,"score_gpt":0.2880236233753925,"score_spread":0.2558246024292183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142961284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42398694,0.011585969,0.0013669325,0.081357285,0.0006067965,0.00010730378,0.00033851946,0.00007375443,0.48057652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520685,0.0018769851,0.00036299726,0.0056112898,0.00006968863,0.000029733525,0.000052153267,0.00002813804,0.03990043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98061746,0.0013708485,0.00040514476,0.0010609423,0.00867639,0.007869208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850012,0.0039480473,0.0009331683,0.00052589603,0.0052141775,0.004377486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053709582,0.00036806244,0.0006747028,0.0039033305,0.048226252,0.016960798,0.002702668,0.0074420758,0.0062412536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024073433,0.0007889798,0.00042429165,0.0064780996,0.023268592,0.0035474254,0.008694522,0.0063722203,0.00047903828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017096245,0.00005204447,0.020277362,0.00012817311,0.000035680172,0.0014476161,0.06727324,0.0007846061,0.00042477922,0.8297109,0.035481323,0.044213235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006517623,0.00006603632,0.08122636,0.0009658481,0.000083925144,0.000777406,0.15043092,0.0014730847,0.00082500814,0.052122973,0.71163625,0.0003269414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99044776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99511033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99044776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17748503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19756006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9540008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144119811","doi":"","title":"A Modern Trustee Act for British Columbia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Trust law; Statutory law; Voting trust; Property (philosophy); Law; Business; Companies Act; Testamentary trust; Law and economics; Political science; Corporate law; Economics; Finance; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.011821894170871533,"score_gpt":0.28081289495475736,"score_spread":0.2689910007838858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144119811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012625104,0.0059787645,0.0047793207,0.07378016,0.0025630773,0.00048228906,0.0016157242,0.00032350683,0.897852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15255508,0.0027006827,0.00597127,0.03864364,0.00027415605,0.00055476115,0.00066378614,0.000121343335,0.7985153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99075705,0.0012922515,0.00060326286,0.0012457626,0.004207742,0.0018939779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247205,0.0018831346,0.00026925284,0.0007943633,0.0038167022,0.0007644437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004557297,0.0005700953,0.00046502086,0.0012631393,0.0134746265,0.008592807,0.0015344826,0.0117467595,0.015073505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016339416,0.00079470995,0.0004604742,0.002164085,0.005607087,0.0031419923,0.0025474534,0.009886812,0.0039635347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027594248,0.000022459544,0.00084797374,0.00007070516,0.0000060173998,0.00030015537,0.0034290198,0.00030632832,0.0004064628,0.6907869,0.2870069,0.0167894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001518093,0.000015027008,0.0020323992,0.00019234626,0.000014470073,0.00010147357,0.0007152066,0.00042169675,0.00020068079,0.015029962,0.98118776,0.000073775314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9330572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93907505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06694281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053296693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10679062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3866964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145464516","doi":"","title":"Report on Exculpation Clauses in Trust Instruments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Legislature; Duty; Liability; Business; Property (philosophy); Law; Trust law; Law and economics; Statement (logic); Political science; Accounting; Economics","score_opus":0.025023891490360196,"score_gpt":0.3045577290244221,"score_spread":0.27953383753406186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145464516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06921861,0.023733418,0.030307349,0.031863276,0.003030583,0.0013462509,0.006315166,0.0007541714,0.8334312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4617355,0.044569615,0.030160807,0.015993405,0.0022531715,0.0009276154,0.013467079,0.0005374532,0.43035528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847462,0.0017028108,0.0012407898,0.0009192969,0.009300924,0.0020899456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451174,0.024996795,0.0034567441,0.003783728,0.021514893,0.0011304648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011357216,0.0004512457,0.00042606852,0.0049774162,0.0044715884,0.0058650076,0.0019610613,0.003993014,0.0252498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031416334,0.00073711236,0.001121715,0.0049893497,0.0020701282,0.007055462,0.0030219737,0.0046356767,0.0034493136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014503037,0.0003444476,0.010477239,0.00071996095,0.000041068935,0.0017248382,0.0044742953,0.001708845,0.002726982,0.678453,0.19018528,0.10899901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022536005,0.00012090324,0.008547922,0.00054228655,0.000055357767,0.00056028226,0.0019653284,0.00071305886,0.009520739,0.014219885,0.96367127,0.000060403017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18741524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11560146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18741524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007472333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016043166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37264872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146069499","doi":"","title":"Consumer guarantees - lessons to be learnt from afar","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer protection; Legislation; Confusion; Consumer law; Business; Consumer Bill of Rights; Consumer Advocacy; Complement (music); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.28760126219012705,"score_gpt":0.4183035686116017,"score_spread":0.13070230642147462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146069499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00816329,0.034217916,0.00403112,0.7695832,0.0026724553,0.000012904517,0.000056834746,0.0000520305,0.18121016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52566135,0.047499582,0.0063630044,0.27176228,0.0056177047,0.000059722213,0.00009269774,0.00014352912,0.14280024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399626,0.0017865032,0.000172532,0.0007324704,0.0025099665,0.0008023311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99106616,0.0048113107,0.00042181864,0.0009252744,0.0020123257,0.00076308136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077949767,0.00032121138,0.0005602649,0.00069606776,0.004302547,0.0090081785,0.0014675516,0.009046065,0.00886967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016557477,0.00028137525,0.00047828432,0.0008379834,0.020840783,0.017171815,0.0036465086,0.013828639,0.001648271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009084213,0.000018390736,0.00023334174,0.00005121328,0.000003676916,0.00007295282,0.0014116201,0.00011611902,0.00005066579,0.94065577,0.040927038,0.01645018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092396385,0.000022913186,0.00082476734,0.00042796019,0.000005305078,0.000104302824,0.0024657184,0.00028137065,0.0001448463,0.5869324,0.40875897,0.000022250259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033980165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041848164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033980165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007555739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010901165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067564726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147481398","doi":"","title":"Let's Not Get Psyched Out of Privacy: Reflections on Withdrawing Consent to the Collection, Use and Disclosure of Personal Information","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Informed consent; Personally identifiable information; Subject (documents); Law; Internet privacy; Psychology; Private information retrieval; Business; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.16126157418468512,"score_gpt":0.3697866053060109,"score_spread":0.20852503112132575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147481398","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120749,0.006373362,0.026102232,0.7481771,0.002061647,0.00021171324,0.000034763278,0.000075717595,0.09621444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8836387,0.0030258503,0.0041893087,0.09439088,0.0004925458,0.00033808377,0.000019958225,0.00015660052,0.013748068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8095095,0.16780221,0.0037633944,0.003999314,0.008820351,0.006105252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79008496,0.18822588,0.0047403034,0.0064394507,0.0076433183,0.0028660558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14612219,0.00078793697,0.0012269439,0.0013956194,0.036874842,0.017513158,0.0040598097,0.027613822,0.0025909424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17267045,0.0011148534,0.0015688736,0.0017235792,0.14447275,0.03104643,0.01640378,0.04130722,0.0006865338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003665411,0.000024447332,0.00035524112,0.0000817652,0.000008442795,0.0008259084,0.74079657,0.00006793218,0.00025393217,0.24571708,0.006072095,0.005759873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006370256,0.0000810951,0.00039802064,0.0010502972,0.00002554785,0.00094925996,0.5624081,0.0003433375,0.000862887,0.20666245,0.22705625,0.00009906383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014398662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013124848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14612219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01470431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022868264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7727772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147835783","doi":"10.18357/tar32201211644","title":"Fiduciary Relationship as Contemporary Colonialism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Arbutus Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Fiduciary; Sovereignty; Law; Constitution; Colonialism; Supreme court; Political science; Discretion; Human rights; Sociology; Politics; Duty","score_opus":0.13656718204548263,"score_gpt":0.41393234544766344,"score_spread":0.2773651634021808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147835783","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016673254,0.95122296,0.00043487814,0.014881216,0.00057170383,0.0000052831974,0.000013374351,0.0000044577105,0.031198721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08698161,0.9006992,0.00060314854,0.0048056045,0.0012361438,0.000020772439,0.00002199313,0.000007674449,0.005623955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956382,0.0025377984,0.00018934456,0.00033393438,0.0010444088,0.00025637454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955101,0.0029919331,0.0004001004,0.00015918615,0.0008008516,0.0001379216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004222481,0.0003158016,0.0006150444,0.003011248,0.0021136375,0.005021831,0.00086609286,0.002093363,0.0018115073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00646056,0.00021373975,0.00023993402,0.004972415,0.014554142,0.0035943848,0.0015485053,0.0029219338,0.00024982585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008709697,0.000013879327,0.00047250642,0.0023771557,0.00002084446,0.00016577222,0.005360149,0.00033739954,0.00011399954,0.8710967,0.021818157,0.09821475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043313225,0.000016084314,0.002510258,0.005760817,0.000023838773,0.0002036985,0.0024294583,0.00014112932,0.00008268271,0.088904485,0.8999098,0.000013519547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09685557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.117456794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09685557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01069462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018364433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19258362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147906309","doi":"10.7202/1019049ar","title":"Le fiduciaire, véritable pivot ou simple rouage de l’opération de fiducie ?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026763090328592566,"score_gpt":0.2897585710114977,"score_spread":0.2629954806829051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147906309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14224583,0.008176708,0.019884182,0.090720296,0.0011640473,0.000067128836,0.00018358105,0.00010350699,0.7374547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9027652,0.0016083285,0.001981569,0.0041934457,0.00023064106,0.00004410169,0.000052116553,0.0000656418,0.08905898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527353,0.0014768158,0.00015261737,0.0008751952,0.00084776233,0.0013742364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973508,0.0008615531,0.00034277816,0.00042506494,0.00066101435,0.00035876266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053224573,0.00041875057,0.00045402866,0.00093561085,0.008500445,0.012236531,0.001309615,0.0039068307,0.01403378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076336013,0.0003927347,0.0004061193,0.00086379424,0.020249719,0.007637836,0.0044999626,0.0044810865,0.0021858644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021381116,0.0000073135134,0.0008749912,0.000031918134,0.000004699084,0.00011664062,0.007423228,0.00008344042,0.00021611758,0.97835827,0.003788721,0.0090733105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039547183,0.00009221568,0.008437304,0.0008493684,0.000041499872,0.00043101318,0.032606225,0.0007087472,0.0015295879,0.28582072,0.6693102,0.00013359121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121416606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1398801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121416606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013100147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016849637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24141973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148472277","doi":"10.1017/s0008197303266307","title":"<scp>VICARIOUS LIABILITY IN ENGLAND AND AUSTRALIA</scp>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Tort; Vicarious liability; Law; Commit; Liability; Political science","score_opus":0.03216145893755584,"score_gpt":0.30629682825174726,"score_spread":0.2741353693141914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148472277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33686918,0.023182712,0.0017420676,0.1274918,0.0010583805,0.0002566666,0.00037217344,0.000080783684,0.5089462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7714952,0.002906062,0.0009046293,0.042696208,0.0002276714,0.00012501945,0.000119383505,0.00003339314,0.18149236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996506,0.0005615257,0.00016281407,0.00032187087,0.001185963,0.0012618758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702877,0.0006366567,0.00033788182,0.0001672287,0.00079928513,0.0010301085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018218914,0.00021044638,0.00030254218,0.0008856715,0.008484886,0.0046421434,0.001249031,0.0072619254,0.0061582634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007016924,0.0004561709,0.0003901264,0.0007080009,0.005699645,0.0022994515,0.004902192,0.0056683035,0.0007004687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007846502,0.00011735343,0.012841764,0.00024825224,0.000033901186,0.0055197272,0.043720473,0.00047361612,0.0012927328,0.80425656,0.100011274,0.03140586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007189866,0.00013203472,0.12024958,0.0007603934,0.000072334704,0.0026281853,0.015936013,0.0011015288,0.0009717666,0.06911451,0.7887975,0.00016434774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69547397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8102865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69547397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012210828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023520786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61263883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148520867","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000518x","title":"The Limits of Judicial Fidelity to Law: The Coxford Lecture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Fidelity; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06233093076396494,"score_gpt":0.32410361598211973,"score_spread":0.2617726852181548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148520867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0090407925,0.07886916,0.012731582,0.31278828,0.010057619,0.000024748513,0.000058878726,0.000073389405,0.5763556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7637749,0.046628535,0.0048533273,0.022047522,0.011639235,0.0000934455,0.000051841293,0.00014781539,0.15076339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701333,0.0012428653,0.00008247985,0.0003642968,0.00077411154,0.00052295433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901018,0.008194653,0.00025323767,0.00057208847,0.00051431207,0.00036385076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005426457,0.0003568058,0.0004596664,0.0009325044,0.005078755,0.006977001,0.0008097443,0.004188566,0.0075519104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015626,0.00047380393,0.00030866748,0.00079165935,0.019622527,0.010557778,0.0018895981,0.009433893,0.0013686377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007789281,0.000004981404,0.00004170954,0.000016881808,0.000001605938,0.00002156226,0.00036936186,0.00011746459,0.000024647099,0.97216415,0.021021545,0.006208394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016391494,0.000012077516,0.00026677162,0.00028654365,0.0000064334404,0.000053141426,0.0003588574,0.00061711716,0.00015448756,0.7516712,0.24653752,0.00001948085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02602033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01795621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02602033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010074453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046875165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07309562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151748216","doi":"","title":"The Flight to the Fiduciary Haven","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Duty; Context (archaeology); Tort; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Liability; Geography","score_opus":0.023605338496873414,"score_gpt":0.28536046740194204,"score_spread":0.26175512890506863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151748216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06951302,0.0040368596,0.03280867,0.08968731,0.0006845691,0.00004630379,0.00005326937,0.00007722315,0.8030927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94480807,0.0010522463,0.0041490966,0.0086603025,0.00020266963,0.000040195366,0.00001705892,0.000053397325,0.041016974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988332,0.0043865032,0.00031650573,0.0015697762,0.003581365,0.0018138997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932683,0.0036057425,0.0004948828,0.0009741778,0.0010853664,0.0005714647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012981863,0.0003446177,0.0008520416,0.0011800037,0.0130927395,0.008620612,0.0015122037,0.007960639,0.0072876695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023119718,0.00065287435,0.00057319686,0.0009791515,0.055207342,0.010952829,0.008455671,0.013000327,0.0009200322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023741736,0.00000143285,0.000086710796,0.0000037126902,5.8941043e-7,0.000024777637,0.0013856896,0.000022157217,0.000023522665,0.99585056,0.00083593477,0.0017624855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014444888,0.0000338391,0.0011836288,0.00029115807,0.0000088764955,0.00037478088,0.0037778087,0.00056181406,0.00025549074,0.7837506,0.209709,0.000038679867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07684564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07043714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07684564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012605658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014512729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15279669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151790217","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss001","title":"The Problem of the 'Lame Duck' Government: A Critique of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Term (time); Law; Sociology; Political science; Economic history; Classics; Philosophy; Art; History; Physics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013543596393313003,"score_gpt":0.28047263661647676,"score_spread":0.26692904022316377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151790217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017718293,0.00801615,0.0135327745,0.43968964,0.0015615962,0.000060140017,0.00012741699,0.00009457943,0.5191995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8265752,0.0021185207,0.0063346885,0.08585551,0.0015911332,0.00031466168,0.00006298394,0.00020129082,0.07694592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96666425,0.0171415,0.0009925149,0.002969517,0.009226375,0.0030059104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98287857,0.011915853,0.0008768968,0.0014153725,0.0022468497,0.00066656986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019716261,0.0004881495,0.0009735916,0.0016264367,0.0150576,0.017759359,0.0038963214,0.026512938,0.0034349437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033114012,0.0007225819,0.0010997573,0.0019733207,0.06442315,0.0077407993,0.0053520347,0.024891607,0.0011552696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028547315,0.0000016273544,0.00002240447,0.0000061215087,0.0000011036778,0.000016471615,0.0014586204,0.00003881093,0.00000911025,0.99345857,0.00435495,0.0006294279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042578493,0.000015477324,0.0005581649,0.00022170189,0.00001455053,0.000107207314,0.0026312706,0.0006368753,0.00013201976,0.76235926,0.23323564,0.00004523221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10298952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08732982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10298952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022322038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01883267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2047801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152559745","doi":"10.1017/s0008197303326212","title":"Exemplary Damages—Two Commonwealth Cases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Damages; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04775190898519161,"score_gpt":0.34829330561716054,"score_spread":0.30054139663196894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152559745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3685153,0.005257179,0.008686176,0.04412022,0.0009012862,0.00034959745,0.00045050972,0.000109933775,0.57160974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9344399,0.0018214758,0.0023365796,0.0112967305,0.00043371707,0.00028488107,0.00019250666,0.000033885306,0.049160283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915302,0.0017596422,0.00041717867,0.0009744384,0.0030685205,0.0022502097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992339,0.0034973158,0.0007493546,0.0012306778,0.0010660551,0.0011175348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049717,0.0004944986,0.0006116072,0.0016071254,0.010017787,0.0045805387,0.0026400855,0.011940124,0.0042833607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017777925,0.0005511437,0.0013591452,0.0016253616,0.008526007,0.0037992857,0.010435396,0.008936899,0.000618711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014672584,0.0001976543,0.0091436785,0.00011150059,0.00006411115,0.00904549,0.015506201,0.00073601503,0.00091436267,0.89890397,0.04715979,0.018070461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035410243,0.00034766833,0.058178607,0.0010262508,0.00027716078,0.017326599,0.021537118,0.00314624,0.0035496005,0.23848802,0.6553712,0.00039758434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037406642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06432792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037406642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044506392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026914096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074377835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153128566","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Contracts, 2nd Edition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rescission; Law; Supreme court; Restitution; Confusion; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Unjust enrichment; Business; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.010386846431715687,"score_gpt":0.29278478174928696,"score_spread":0.2823979353175713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153128566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010930855,0.1560427,0.017514732,0.04604763,0.025279645,0.00014710314,0.0032748422,0.000600192,0.7500001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019025406,0.15225467,0.013111437,0.016158676,0.020726446,0.0002608162,0.003382858,0.00081690156,0.7742628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986022,0.00020314712,0.0000968992,0.00015626881,0.00081744173,0.00012399247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775666,0.0010903727,0.00010886732,0.00017514579,0.0007132912,0.00015575648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001401138,0.00095943833,0.00061306683,0.0024837554,0.0021228045,0.004262665,0.0011932759,0.0022482323,0.09398319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044322037,0.000701174,0.00077760534,0.0034480973,0.0025737053,0.004741494,0.0013405936,0.003926477,0.029979128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007795,0.00001864821,0.0001190912,0.00015350246,0.0000022325128,0.000060556053,0.00026631964,0.00029326792,0.00011835683,0.18123634,0.7688616,0.048862312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010355386,0.000004525929,0.00012039893,0.000133114,5.49443e-7,0.00006662193,0.000049167047,0.00006381302,0.000013992137,0.016579675,0.98296285,0.000004211097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014234927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015406294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09398319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045995736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054430193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31440508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153155984","doi":"10.1017/s1744552312000249","title":"The vulnerable subject of negligence law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Subject (documents); Jurisprudence; Relevance (law); Law; Criticism; Duty; Autonomy; Duty of care; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Damages; Common law; Law and economics; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.04358637366607834,"score_gpt":0.37210867690184324,"score_spread":0.3285223032357649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153155984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1612167,0.0077681714,0.06211316,0.067021295,0.0004963443,0.00015140367,0.00009616922,0.00006262621,0.7010741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881941,0.00082532567,0.0017451228,0.0017728742,0.00015934343,0.000048314694,0.000011739497,0.00001203622,0.007231043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99296737,0.003983737,0.0002469569,0.0006515849,0.0015294754,0.0006209556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938221,0.003576326,0.0005886232,0.0006528888,0.0008494118,0.0005106766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005726675,0.00032168883,0.00060850056,0.0018386703,0.0050232587,0.0067024543,0.0010741573,0.0038105985,0.0031990085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074435654,0.000247148,0.00046307387,0.00081883627,0.05336895,0.005490787,0.008487057,0.0036065334,0.00025255198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014703262,0.0000026142347,0.00017001321,0.0000084650255,0.0000015335863,0.00008245266,0.0036774531,0.000055307337,0.000059945844,0.994998,0.00026794168,0.00067483954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004000785,0.000014994508,0.00050152733,0.00012609022,0.000005553549,0.00018001453,0.0034374108,0.00034893298,0.00010219855,0.9697611,0.025508793,0.000009345237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00843551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005531494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00843551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006815051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066347676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04944688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157076830","doi":"10.7202/1000622ar","title":"Democratizing Common Law Constitutionalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Judicial review; Common law; Public law; Democracy; Administrative law; Sources of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09037132734554755,"score_gpt":0.3211790912281851,"score_spread":0.23080776388263757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157076830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053350545,0.004303507,0.24562667,0.09476063,0.0011202338,0.0003070872,0.00015513347,0.00047816974,0.59989804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361366,0.0015659366,0.03156034,0.008538964,0.0010885523,0.00030915593,0.000086073145,0.00015481173,0.020559577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826151,0.0075280485,0.0006775776,0.0030121787,0.004015263,0.0021519046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97921824,0.011656333,0.0011202197,0.0048599048,0.0022028028,0.0009423943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023507154,0.00048585972,0.0007876765,0.002176575,0.004913132,0.009395652,0.0017259743,0.004331549,0.0040563853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03171413,0.00046126582,0.0009685308,0.0013326076,0.032746248,0.010078258,0.008652317,0.0086188475,0.00095792755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018234795,0.000005334925,0.000049510647,0.000008656795,0.0000027908936,0.000015358863,0.00033115607,0.0005088944,0.000057510963,0.996445,0.0007351234,0.0018388858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008492529,0.0000068503723,0.00005901345,0.000026995378,0.000004066786,0.000012304124,0.000104478575,0.0007153845,0.00012519065,0.97748667,0.021443723,0.000006764787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071726907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00680789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023507154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009393859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012945692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124319196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157653217","doi":"10.1017/s0008197303006457","title":"Interceptive Subtraction, Unjust Enrichment and Wrongs—A Reply to Professor Birks","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Restitution; Law; Wrongdoing; Obligation; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.026767368077400263,"score_gpt":0.32192189340998867,"score_spread":0.2951545253325884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157653217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015938615,0.007932646,0.00010472217,0.987241,0.0033364135,0.0000012521822,0.00000783705,0.0000061464516,0.0012105441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012530387,0.011261045,0.00036552426,0.94790494,0.020887379,0.00001975442,0.000012628464,0.000044798315,0.0069735358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927699,0.0028090007,0.00044454233,0.0012769732,0.0018892084,0.0008104679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976346,0.019179938,0.0006068838,0.00053613004,0.0020512843,0.001279819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013129499,0.00085522194,0.0018051715,0.0013869393,0.006471606,0.008338802,0.004303908,0.045971658,0.005521954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029145272,0.0008860653,0.0014222086,0.001622081,0.032174807,0.024661075,0.0047913184,0.059729,0.0021209691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028273958,0.000020522364,0.0001581412,0.000065609966,0.000010166857,0.00016454562,0.0008099154,0.00011712315,0.000048891332,0.14750585,0.84376746,0.0073035387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060407983,0.000032175158,0.00062856404,0.0006403989,0.000018983324,0.00044090368,0.0023556275,0.0003528158,0.00015544688,0.19820175,0.7970009,0.000112004665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030702766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040485214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045971658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011001709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01151523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079823315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159610229","doi":"10.7202/043501ar","title":"Compensation for Loss of an Economic Nature : An Australian Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounts payable; Compensation (psychology); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Rehabilitation; Business; Limb loss; Social security; Personal injury; Actuarial science; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law; Physical therapy; Computer science; Psychiatry; Market economy","score_opus":0.013950683456435065,"score_gpt":0.3215184956270114,"score_spread":0.3075678121705763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159610229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07060346,0.050672676,0.009368194,0.45263243,0.002366862,0.00015151924,0.0001720389,0.000036198086,0.41399658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82382333,0.0451559,0.0055090305,0.050712053,0.0026551627,0.00015936757,0.000073061,0.00002884127,0.071883306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167776,0.003250781,0.00046272494,0.0005436757,0.002842624,0.0012223946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963851,0.0012268396,0.0005234967,0.00019505367,0.0010618551,0.000607653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007976701,0.0005744526,0.0005980936,0.0035312069,0.0036517247,0.007470491,0.0020933433,0.009053283,0.004975152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012177372,0.00043085765,0.00076588,0.0019188429,0.009726533,0.006967084,0.004605686,0.007019742,0.00044929702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023090199,0.000073601834,0.0016663302,0.00018536617,0.000016426924,0.0005368604,0.0040224367,0.0010825328,0.00026055673,0.95693094,0.009269568,0.025932282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043755692,0.0004451881,0.022934318,0.0029339243,0.000077061995,0.0020302038,0.0089109335,0.0062069194,0.00044060705,0.45673636,0.49905622,0.00018438436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05532016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060343653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05532016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014214559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011440515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10999632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160510965","doi":"","title":"The Debt-Equity Distinction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Debt; Economics; Statutory law; Positive economics; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.03939687844091073,"score_gpt":0.3244692756357674,"score_spread":0.28507239719485666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160510965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041026548,0.010432672,0.0466912,0.097224094,0.0009673534,0.00009342702,0.000514707,0.000061281105,0.80298865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90112764,0.004321944,0.00674726,0.019418988,0.0017618375,0.0002657016,0.00019692477,0.00007576258,0.0660839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551207,0.0013746091,0.00023758465,0.00089931424,0.0012622437,0.0007141601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780184,0.0010802012,0.00024277526,0.0003167226,0.0003157765,0.00024259774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042203167,0.0003592094,0.00049069925,0.0011878416,0.0032123849,0.007444119,0.0013443852,0.005535107,0.007833165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008765352,0.00028858279,0.00048750456,0.0013914838,0.015697628,0.010979935,0.0056388946,0.007888072,0.0010233271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001950445,0.0000015486737,0.00007405702,0.0000037491473,6.6156633e-7,0.000009240936,0.00012161872,0.000018385179,0.00001867488,0.9978644,0.0009311408,0.00095443113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063929083,0.000009021965,0.000499588,0.000067619774,0.0000033869496,0.00008228341,0.00022314879,0.00020985832,0.00011635191,0.9320458,0.06672909,0.0000074192913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026699123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007833165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044986084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026181429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03263992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162797822","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2000.tb00138.x","title":"Illegal transactions: chaos or discretion?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Statutory law; Discretion; Commonwealth; Law; Law reform; Judicial discretion; Political science; Common law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.05893827733802574,"score_gpt":0.3834800210036837,"score_spread":0.32454174366565797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162797822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25906268,0.011363042,0.046001986,0.23689759,0.0006616616,0.00011319647,0.0002039285,0.00011732657,0.44557852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860217,0.001714466,0.0020891821,0.0020124114,0.00036799474,0.00004710346,0.000027279491,0.000024598661,0.007695165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99198276,0.00384444,0.0005316053,0.00085415336,0.0017578651,0.0010292289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666353,0.020989323,0.0049470123,0.0038463587,0.0019789096,0.0016031547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067165536,0.00019362148,0.000596795,0.0024770459,0.0042915405,0.011683865,0.001197705,0.002961267,0.0040545114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027100265,0.00036279875,0.00039140135,0.0022881723,0.05649504,0.015038206,0.007300179,0.0036064307,0.0005551385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007761472,0.000005622641,0.0007511293,0.000022984093,0.0000020118166,0.00006638103,0.0054175,0.0002482647,0.000036196107,0.98734903,0.0013715678,0.004721548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008017409,0.000015160777,0.0016257844,0.00017940512,0.0000038103196,0.0001268992,0.008073289,0.0009208812,0.000056601006,0.9505401,0.038431466,0.000018596182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055506933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00609675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011683865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004604154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050934665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03552091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166345381","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2007.36.1.50","title":"Protecting Prepaying Buyers of Unascertained Goods: Why ‘Pay before You Go’ May Be Bad for You","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Legislature; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Commission; Intervention (counseling); Judicial review; Doctrine; Injustice; Law and economics; Common law; Position (finance); Economics","score_opus":0.056863311170841646,"score_gpt":0.38294445570573404,"score_spread":0.3260811445348924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166345381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14442432,0.022494754,0.012876228,0.56214076,0.0016300546,0.00007326649,0.00008125051,0.000050596056,0.25622874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9032429,0.006398424,0.0020946036,0.06469484,0.00066188513,0.000032920652,0.000020345213,0.000031133888,0.022823041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574536,0.0015885186,0.0001863047,0.0005127786,0.0011964422,0.0007706371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988086,0.007814409,0.0013194042,0.000639697,0.0018124126,0.00032810008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073460382,0.00018488607,0.00049339025,0.0005975811,0.004631887,0.009033806,0.0014969961,0.011180182,0.0049476265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018566785,0.0003568002,0.0005198868,0.0005722801,0.018963248,0.008815191,0.0024259721,0.0069181263,0.0008911225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007322926,0.000058091326,0.007202269,0.00021587682,0.00002813499,0.0014413525,0.01757285,0.00020069824,0.0005981762,0.9159799,0.034474086,0.022155294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006190057,0.00020411059,0.01042607,0.0011020921,0.00013761746,0.0021063243,0.034058206,0.001047837,0.0038753853,0.49982554,0.44697908,0.00017579868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01608055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019918043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01608055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031684465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004648511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03885001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166489623","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.33","title":"Credit Counselling in Canada: An Empirical Examination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Bankruptcy; Debt; Agency (philosophy); Disadvantaged; Business; Empirical research; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Creditor","score_opus":0.02640559053585586,"score_gpt":0.28254005054074627,"score_spread":0.25613446000489043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166489623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777119,0.000881396,0.00017573335,0.0037515908,0.000030712854,0.000270364,0.003096208,0.00002071256,0.014061176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932348,0.00092441007,0.00028773627,0.0007670392,0.000012535543,0.000087195665,0.0012407431,0.000012891214,0.003432604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99246687,0.0010273558,0.00036990154,0.0006005162,0.003146231,0.0023890613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548357,0.010255352,0.0074564065,0.0010793553,0.01917428,0.0071988595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004387937,0.00040430494,0.0010649642,0.005024386,0.014825323,0.004986557,0.0039716247,0.0016791406,0.009381199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023860915,0.0006497775,0.00070492877,0.017570602,0.0043419637,0.0017820504,0.0032353941,0.0036822509,0.00064545457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014142331,0.00069736276,0.93230736,0.00027934974,0.00007277356,0.00046622512,0.027920706,0.00030285382,0.0000965639,0.0056014154,0.012191888,0.019922063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031262804,0.00006960765,0.8741472,0.00053483126,0.00006465885,0.00010807542,0.10990223,0.0013359814,0.00011505644,0.0003364684,0.01329722,0.000057294288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99825484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11587493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11587493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20912658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84073544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166977184","doi":"10.1017/s0008197301000666","title":"Relief Against Forfeiture: A Restatement","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Doctrine; Law; Jurisdiction; Creditor; Economic Justice; Security interest; Debt; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Unjust enrichment; Choice of law; Restitution; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.029245477412799842,"score_gpt":0.3171947528902771,"score_spread":0.2879492754774773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166977184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05242437,0.0064841737,0.07180191,0.22479118,0.0030051947,0.00029386606,0.00008349857,0.00034555697,0.64077026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87100345,0.0012948179,0.008186139,0.038745243,0.0018842123,0.00030041946,0.00003765383,0.0001435142,0.078404546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751751,0.009968431,0.0015887625,0.004028782,0.0053950245,0.0038439534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878781,0.005309787,0.0011527878,0.003150199,0.0017821299,0.00072703685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018917877,0.00072302273,0.0013272826,0.0013862184,0.007354768,0.01079413,0.0044173696,0.026931318,0.0063516265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038160346,0.0007852565,0.0019074486,0.00064404734,0.031081112,0.013053388,0.014264948,0.014603203,0.0016123488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003171067,0.00003899579,0.00016492775,0.000023391594,0.000012084215,0.0003433975,0.0010704332,0.0002244729,0.0003323077,0.9866676,0.0052870554,0.0058035166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011674386,0.00025173303,0.0010171289,0.00032752744,0.000066719986,0.0013539484,0.0014048524,0.0023222207,0.0014074701,0.80827653,0.18334424,0.0001108798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025564388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025882453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026931318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039300183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054701357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10004848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167445073","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12143","title":"The Politics of Jurisdiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Politics; Political science; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Framing (construction); Exclusive jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Scholarship; Federal jurisdiction; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Geography","score_opus":0.07583192905293384,"score_gpt":0.36920301683825435,"score_spread":0.2933710877853205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167445073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034996387,0.07223823,0.06374978,0.09127521,0.0013871177,0.000068072106,0.00017842148,0.00007718672,0.7360295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564552,0.013482153,0.0046828836,0.007884169,0.0011753746,0.00010225841,0.00006563589,0.000044329292,0.016108094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852468,0.009443734,0.00037077116,0.0017490956,0.0021992926,0.0009902755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930734,0.0045557376,0.0005255216,0.00082835177,0.0006948174,0.00032219544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008562733,0.00024174326,0.0006347885,0.0019818074,0.005543386,0.009599387,0.0011765631,0.0031282294,0.0047214334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013560588,0.00027563865,0.00040946266,0.00246958,0.046676565,0.00959771,0.00572755,0.004715419,0.0006555776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.134695e-7,6.44309e-7,0.000054789798,0.000009745049,0.0000014128514,0.000007938294,0.00058026623,0.00003754707,0.000017114515,0.9964012,0.0006561218,0.0022323069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037065752,0.000010907069,0.00040095413,0.00018069248,0.0000072202165,0.00006746848,0.0011708984,0.00012739822,0.00007020069,0.85304517,0.14490636,0.000009168465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073543712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052682185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009599387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006327147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072999857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0459069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168451299","doi":"","title":"Should the Law Preserve Party Control? Litigation Investment, Insurance Law and Double Standards","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.029748161808961737,"score_gpt":0.3067582464924807,"score_spread":0.27701008468351895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168451299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11018755,0.015112286,0.03456474,0.2147563,0.00073963887,0.000053889704,0.0000817591,0.00008596042,0.62441784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652394,0.0019738136,0.0015447687,0.009767522,0.0007531366,0.000042329746,0.000018977706,0.000027686972,0.020632382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936779,0.0019005119,0.00017394773,0.00093224214,0.002139417,0.001176018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443203,0.0031593682,0.0007445192,0.00071932434,0.0005857859,0.00035910762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005339271,0.0002582838,0.0004611359,0.0010400302,0.0037520023,0.008359276,0.0012813159,0.00666333,0.0048396788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011193985,0.00023945868,0.0005383013,0.000994196,0.027239023,0.0106664905,0.0040256334,0.00766837,0.0006591019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032775663,0.000005262023,0.00015326569,0.0000059734275,0.0000016634009,0.000021386079,0.00029129745,0.00007057799,0.000039612347,0.9956864,0.0007661301,0.0029552781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013183153,0.000018703187,0.0006604391,0.00007457832,0.000006770655,0.000057145746,0.00034690675,0.0004963846,0.00024432078,0.9686137,0.029454786,0.00001309108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067141494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041778474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008359276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058251107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032820345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042264402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170220604","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v2n4p17","title":"The Family Trust In New Zealand and the Claims of ‘Unwelcome Beneficiaries’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Trust law; Blind trust; Appeal; Honour; Equity (law); Law; Testamentary trust; Constructive trust; Creditor; Express trust; Nothing; Common law; Political science; Family law; Sociology; Business; Debt; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01685159270415006,"score_gpt":0.29684887342396027,"score_spread":0.2799972807198102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170220604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53833145,0.021793377,0.0009036111,0.16178516,0.0010362125,0.000100296435,0.000117452706,0.000019489224,0.27591294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566359,0.0044605737,0.00021925464,0.0058952444,0.00015383826,0.00003885099,0.000018219307,0.0000140264965,0.03256416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686015,0.0007169053,0.0001271466,0.0002823339,0.0008816757,0.0011318229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951121,0.0014744712,0.0010325491,0.0004290759,0.00067429384,0.0012775194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042047827,0.00025409146,0.00032808218,0.0011056114,0.01381156,0.004766345,0.0012780579,0.0053108474,0.008502845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015305089,0.0003810944,0.00038439393,0.0010303559,0.020115936,0.0069291163,0.0059609357,0.0061158757,0.00035732595],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016270902,0.0000782209,0.020576498,0.00021074174,0.000045942274,0.013034482,0.3770524,0.00012610851,0.00085504306,0.48233593,0.04843068,0.057091277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008560188,0.00014966397,0.06508374,0.0013023602,0.000074390366,0.008048715,0.2446054,0.00042253872,0.00043107636,0.047766328,0.6318242,0.00020590221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5343263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5791938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5343263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017769217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0166017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93683225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170376300","doi":"10.1002/iir.1221","title":"A Statutory Basis for the Anti‐Deprivation Rule?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Rule of law; Insolvency; Legislature; Law and economics; Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; Basis (linear algebra); Statutory interpretation; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.054489572588834585,"score_gpt":0.3808600742018635,"score_spread":0.32637050161302894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170376300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045978453,0.006124993,0.089734755,0.15723306,0.00394497,0.00015280452,0.00043509,0.00021249354,0.6961833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92730933,0.0013764135,0.012733423,0.026746733,0.0016482807,0.00023183647,0.00016312774,0.00006915363,0.029721644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991228,0.0022957772,0.00074600533,0.0013733668,0.0034170968,0.0009398724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99072266,0.0049819504,0.00083578937,0.0009900468,0.0022282,0.0002412895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011469262,0.00025359797,0.00081992225,0.0014412428,0.0028801318,0.007552482,0.002388745,0.0058551375,0.005462592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019164419,0.00039073813,0.0007718134,0.0009428419,0.017090563,0.004509506,0.0026501378,0.009129648,0.001495137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003290146,0.0000057752777,0.000073674695,0.000010655987,0.0000015887787,0.000022131198,0.00013643866,0.000058142356,0.00004110869,0.99686915,0.0015347212,0.0012432907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002653283,0.000022174401,0.00054047594,0.00022277024,0.000009904171,0.00011773755,0.0003112927,0.0010339111,0.00037948487,0.9286066,0.0687054,0.000023609256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008161102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060342257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011469262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003467954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059299506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06065595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171753977","doi":"10.1002/iir.94","title":"Consumer insolvency in Australia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Legislation; Debtor; Consumer Protection Act; Legislature; Business; Debt; Law reform; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Consumer law; Creditor; Economics; Accounting; Law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.11550065840964933,"score_gpt":0.4448956130419099,"score_spread":0.32939495463226054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171753977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45459935,0.08870121,0.001797273,0.027468095,0.000579019,0.00019318219,0.000115275456,0.00004250055,0.42650414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89114016,0.036645092,0.00066466484,0.005260766,0.00027201482,0.000050083094,0.000093583956,0.000010110576,0.065863386],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792755,0.0005926499,0.0001154965,0.00013425865,0.0010547398,0.00017526651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968779,0.00076867,0.0006441107,0.00009116476,0.0014435851,0.00017453052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001985888,0.00009569036,0.00023736195,0.001217023,0.001209304,0.0018866388,0.0003321201,0.00093748607,0.0035156573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00471443,0.00014654554,0.00014237728,0.0015919661,0.0012848728,0.0005697897,0.0008683235,0.00097286975,0.0002524148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014250129,0.00026033798,0.035748113,0.0028177062,0.00005736461,0.004741234,0.0414627,0.0024611005,0.00306581,0.34794518,0.08152849,0.47976947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019723731,0.0002986954,0.15534419,0.001410765,0.000041474315,0.0015867656,0.0059432085,0.0015195892,0.0010086356,0.011766448,0.8210202,0.00004025368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0743255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07939828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0743255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036689516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00692081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14778578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172510999","doi":"10.5287/ora-jbq6byenm","title":"The public-private nature of charity law in England and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.020091420054840436,"score_gpt":0.27239010682166404,"score_spread":0.2522986867668236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172510999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4604026,0.01083334,0.0035578746,0.07952752,0.0005900159,0.00019475677,0.0007243905,0.00014561237,0.44402388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94063497,0.0016126855,0.00058222486,0.0031364677,0.00004115098,0.00003212715,0.00008251631,0.000032365726,0.053845562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912298,0.00075388455,0.00017517402,0.0008118329,0.0028163341,0.004213045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896231,0.0029129232,0.00054866046,0.0004030004,0.0037647814,0.0027475348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030291867,0.00026622773,0.0005399174,0.0018117091,0.021132948,0.0116390595,0.0020146433,0.0030484262,0.0060909595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011623677,0.0005573424,0.00034865775,0.0030888768,0.015080106,0.0028980453,0.0039949506,0.0040151626,0.00030015814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007483835,0.00004042223,0.007364248,0.00016993225,0.000023055605,0.0011363535,0.039154556,0.0009637183,0.00046632162,0.9092732,0.017388985,0.023944318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006252357,0.000054850945,0.08459999,0.00083240354,0.000076736076,0.0006236216,0.08994167,0.0027163744,0.0006923429,0.05032703,0.7697305,0.00034193211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99868864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24932605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24932605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27282542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8706754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21740786","doi":"10.29173/alr326","title":"Doing “Practical Justice” for Duress in Contract Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Rescission; Equity (law); Economic Justice; Mistake; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04890527607925705,"score_gpt":0.41643898443367133,"score_spread":0.3675337083544143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21740786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016248316,0.118503705,0.050196797,0.3040577,0.0038483576,0.00020879025,0.00008423556,0.000100993544,0.5067511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7881447,0.054178707,0.015649103,0.08869564,0.008457239,0.0003951224,0.000087122666,0.0001021315,0.044290192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744133,0.012550623,0.0012886017,0.002067515,0.006753541,0.002926556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97156334,0.02140843,0.0013076555,0.002701654,0.002033057,0.0009859285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03156325,0.0005025098,0.0010066221,0.0023706045,0.0054970086,0.008198853,0.001988696,0.013645164,0.0042380076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03894601,0.0005800289,0.0011607186,0.0017815611,0.06060636,0.012065437,0.0044089453,0.0164627,0.0009088182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017831886,0.0000062763334,0.000080634265,0.00003840579,0.0000029975638,0.000034246168,0.00040930894,0.000073907766,0.000021693004,0.99231344,0.0032300388,0.003787255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015096734,0.00002688498,0.0005748948,0.00041834853,0.000008996319,0.000115103576,0.0006049253,0.00016577254,0.000079247344,0.89813405,0.09983949,0.000017141021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013076125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014788068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03156325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008397688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019454455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16692442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176320391","doi":"","title":"Woe Unto You, Judges: Or How Reading Frankfurter and Greene, Ruined Me as a Labour Lawyer and Made Me as an Academic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.032251348778853675,"score_gpt":0.30256357004850404,"score_spread":0.2703122212696504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176320391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007160903,0.044868696,0.0045635975,0.48052612,0.011598411,0.000024950554,0.00012364837,0.00012609974,0.45100754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20486864,0.01835511,0.0032619187,0.106530964,0.0029396196,0.000043829663,0.000107587846,0.00040373908,0.6634886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879825,0.0004007323,0.000032260035,0.00020271359,0.00034823563,0.00021776717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853945,0.00066120096,0.00014060565,0.00011523517,0.00035580236,0.00018779693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012592304,0.00034099017,0.00038488582,0.00090393244,0.0057878336,0.0073986426,0.00054915505,0.003125832,0.02082679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011589406,0.00028303557,0.0001792061,0.00088611303,0.008239916,0.0105844615,0.0015450169,0.0044983886,0.005644271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013278734,0.000010689165,0.00044218655,0.000057223788,0.000004986578,0.00011048492,0.0067062075,0.000039424827,0.00023225906,0.30387112,0.6441642,0.044348024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004166024,0.000009722614,0.0007792253,0.00044726732,0.000004930057,0.000117953874,0.007029779,0.00004764635,0.00020718377,0.07206405,0.91927,0.000018023771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025990637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09825462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025990637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033627814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003471987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069672525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178042","doi":"10.29173/alr401","title":"A Revisionist History of Tort Law: From Holmesian Realism to Neoclassical Rationalism, alan Calnan (Durham, n.C: Carolina Academic Press, 2005)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Realism; Rationalism; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.08800107265146155,"score_gpt":0.3598297665241361,"score_spread":0.27182869387267455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071144346,0.34804523,0.011881261,0.42214453,0.0028197917,0.00002010257,0.0001668423,0.00005086826,0.2077569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64254487,0.22671545,0.0069291866,0.034877785,0.007418702,0.0000497748,0.00012357671,0.00009440825,0.08124633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985448,0.00058712746,0.000049050323,0.00013268783,0.00058201974,0.000104418585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971535,0.0018838792,0.00013544675,0.00017078726,0.00055112987,0.000105358355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029867184,0.00021909938,0.00029549134,0.0012832957,0.0018933439,0.00363077,0.0008447861,0.0021983616,0.002556918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050556525,0.0002941893,0.00025402606,0.0011409372,0.014725478,0.0050946046,0.001025524,0.0041847033,0.0003924744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075859534,0.000008867321,0.00007916718,0.000053473635,0.000004133251,0.00002611558,0.0004552675,0.0004960692,0.00003884058,0.93695176,0.047413327,0.014465351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047523686,0.0000047702956,0.000345508,0.00018476936,0.0000028326208,0.0000322849,0.0001811189,0.00033413057,0.00005969433,0.8487611,0.15008049,0.000008592684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025201462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03810394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025201462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008396049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006003018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060917854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179498709","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198268581.003.0006","title":"Towards a Theory of Contract","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Tort; Unjust enrichment; Situated; Normative; Law and economics; Private law; Law; Equity (law); Breach of contract; Nothing; Political science; Damages; Sociology; Epistemology; Liability; Public law; Philosophy; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.03723195056172664,"score_gpt":0.3046576213991783,"score_spread":0.26742567083745167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179498709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00530443,0.013012952,0.21018755,0.04356384,0.0010261036,0.00009606153,0.00028360958,0.00019532032,0.72633016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6023055,0.019230325,0.13889295,0.011344993,0.002599112,0.0006927136,0.0006574396,0.00043286794,0.22384408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730456,0.001329104,0.0000929214,0.00026986268,0.0008164823,0.0001869598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977545,0.0011198807,0.00012297696,0.00032179596,0.0004761704,0.00020466693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035205903,0.0007929398,0.00081311556,0.0019376792,0.0033730872,0.007667235,0.00195147,0.003822026,0.012216991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039336584,0.00055047916,0.0010160384,0.0023012485,0.017988043,0.012184911,0.002798854,0.0073220055,0.0025711383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.950138e-7,0.0000014904737,0.0000063114503,0.000004180862,4.803113e-7,0.000003599134,0.000049026967,0.000112146714,0.0000052031573,0.99808455,0.0011545757,0.00057794334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018837827,0.0000013871584,0.000012009957,0.000018937484,5.4833123e-7,0.0000068518502,0.000049698254,0.0005493483,0.000008227107,0.9779549,0.021394951,0.0000011761325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071057007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034814004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012216991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009443584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050888197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180453660","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005993","title":"A Duty to Make Restitution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Duty; Mistake; Law and economics; Liability; Law; Payment; Common law; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.027549752726063303,"score_gpt":0.3140123958049609,"score_spread":0.28646264307889757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180453660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041782267,0.0018464281,0.115771465,0.0355767,0.0018639833,0.0003921105,0.0003126979,0.00030182136,0.8021525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7892657,0.0013666807,0.033571478,0.025162257,0.0011360407,0.0005334434,0.00022866116,0.00020136945,0.14853443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846029,0.0033983572,0.0017155318,0.002511707,0.0057028746,0.002068687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864314,0.0041762413,0.0012431947,0.0040688547,0.003231749,0.00084852084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010114501,0.00060510717,0.00091194874,0.0012130014,0.005511469,0.0055840756,0.0025071574,0.009406701,0.0067831185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021330703,0.0007665751,0.00107341,0.00052262394,0.02271066,0.0074626314,0.0067748697,0.008565414,0.0029129277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009150652,0.000024741892,0.00032920993,0.000024760446,0.0000075943144,0.00009115364,0.0012020536,0.00016560346,0.00030841382,0.98917866,0.0032298039,0.0054288204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045123026,0.00010069878,0.0014423562,0.0003731869,0.000045320074,0.000722157,0.0009843333,0.0009772895,0.0016721,0.70854646,0.28499165,0.00009926096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00731535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061691497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010114501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002505183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009619109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053491235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W218283612","doi":"","title":"Profitable Justice: Aligning Third-Party Financing of Litigation with the Normative Functions of the Canadian Judicial System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Legislature; Sophistication; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Business; Normative; Diversity (politics); Law and economics; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014073543294201228,"score_gpt":0.24836978966143086,"score_spread":0.23429624636722962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W218283612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055131257,0.003572839,0.063784696,0.07265872,0.00029361752,0.00031435347,0.0001238527,0.00017305913,0.8039476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94323915,0.001778895,0.020200392,0.0033628244,0.00017546963,0.00012385358,0.000052969175,0.000058096637,0.031008227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834669,0.0036553764,0.0003220926,0.0008961764,0.007810759,0.0038487427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904606,0.0037327416,0.0007366941,0.0008272005,0.003325029,0.00091776316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011106871,0.0004807706,0.00044854128,0.003971564,0.013471926,0.014485175,0.0030680774,0.0048061456,0.003741149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026067857,0.00046068188,0.0006664866,0.0026417559,0.021760598,0.006349728,0.0050045564,0.003981958,0.0003162894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021019848,0.0000026845187,0.00034827864,0.000009378456,0.0000016057472,0.000030604577,0.000982852,0.00039753376,0.0000638092,0.99200565,0.0011264154,0.005029064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032223743,0.000020733332,0.006656935,0.0003309004,0.000035475237,0.00014320345,0.0044112923,0.006367263,0.00072965014,0.773391,0.20778671,0.00009460514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88687956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9262993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11312044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099446386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20464878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7215374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184059481","doi":"","title":"The Juridical Control on Expropriation in the Jordanian Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dirasat: Shari'a and Law Sciences","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Legitimacy; Control (management); Compensation (psychology); Law; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Politics; Management; Geography","score_opus":0.019231606709241983,"score_gpt":0.3189839530715979,"score_spread":0.2997523463623559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184059481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.724238,0.0029762795,0.011721023,0.010674102,0.00017527668,0.00013236547,0.00014428113,0.000029486997,0.24990927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946543,0.00021617606,0.0004087512,0.00035766506,0.00011781727,0.000020055759,0.000009765788,0.000004889373,0.004210552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878984,0.0041223397,0.00076256815,0.0018585671,0.0038107254,0.0015474475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656371,0.017147604,0.007710922,0.0025769074,0.00522723,0.0017001565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015241141,0.00025904583,0.00049970887,0.002115194,0.004238992,0.008868869,0.001052179,0.0017106445,0.007179614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030983897,0.00037114212,0.00034514067,0.0016528678,0.011334943,0.0034186742,0.0024550976,0.0024362076,0.00040585845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012790387,0.0002549875,0.029862646,0.0000942907,0.00009269227,0.0003318428,0.010219539,0.0017116645,0.0012412595,0.9186567,0.0028990281,0.03450746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017977966,0.00048129773,0.16293506,0.0003323115,0.00018591096,0.00041334695,0.014864445,0.011586335,0.0029468583,0.72616714,0.07966921,0.00023836023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010118732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074395575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015241141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005201237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007868699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08060384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184887330","doi":"","title":"INTERIM CONDENSED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental science; Waste management; Operations management; Economics; Business; Engineering; Political science; History","score_opus":0.08623232328657399,"score_gpt":0.3373713035045046,"score_spread":0.25113898021793063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184887330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014837212,0.0014625178,0.004370185,0.058607023,0.024387807,0.0017913434,0.06421584,0.0035274553,0.82680076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02305177,0.00033584714,0.0015973945,0.009190303,0.0026137999,0.0009156786,0.0065905196,0.00041704,0.95528775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958521,0.00034675875,0.00024977763,0.0003995594,0.0020021992,0.0011495717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99332523,0.001310614,0.00032146063,0.00095851783,0.0036464303,0.00043766157],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047208266,0.0009055,0.0018132109,0.0022688662,0.005200043,0.010490066,0.00350141,0.017301416,0.13369909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017755723,0.0011209955,0.0016123694,0.0016819158,0.0012340817,0.0032085765,0.0025705502,0.009972072,0.11006406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054708845,0.00012912351,0.0005230535,0.00007007455,0.000019381212,0.0001557377,0.00013622733,0.00024392406,0.0005520501,0.035757806,0.95206463,0.0098009715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013486439,0.00010829934,0.0068340907,0.00016058689,0.00004881978,0.00006337488,0.00020791638,0.00095789914,0.0013789859,0.01099444,0.9790061,0.000104462895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024823444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04503093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86630094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071034813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010722535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.447268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185371555","doi":"10.1177/1473779515592833","title":"Injured passengers and the defence of illegality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Appeal; Tort; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Business; Proposition; High Court; Liability; Economics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07494922749480872,"score_gpt":0.38303665179963603,"score_spread":0.30808742430482733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185371555","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0222289,0.84596616,0.0013251124,0.053562623,0.0009605103,0.00004672982,0.00006363011,0.000006726203,0.075839676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4894838,0.49007902,0.0008093505,0.013355504,0.00117878,0.000047261543,0.000057245943,0.00000659907,0.0049824016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98904,0.0068040024,0.0006445931,0.00047097504,0.002396734,0.0006436882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679785,0.024317317,0.0039188936,0.00048642242,0.0028301885,0.0004685768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0117054805,0.0002767536,0.0007925602,0.0054356335,0.0021126512,0.0034959686,0.0009625384,0.0058212313,0.0023247323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028067281,0.00027650013,0.00058507745,0.003046182,0.011821417,0.0035955787,0.0022605227,0.002975983,0.00029623433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034432946,0.000054027867,0.0033816842,0.004123164,0.0000940001,0.0006301847,0.0054916465,0.0005853615,0.00016379499,0.84125787,0.013970742,0.13021304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045041834,0.000237891,0.019896962,0.02404579,0.0001793917,0.0010774162,0.010909828,0.00042094203,0.0003641251,0.42344767,0.5192954,0.000079601545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021437407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023212688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021437407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041005076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010522174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061905205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187050213","doi":"","title":"Sentencing Aboriginal Offenders: The Honour of the Crown, Reconciliation and Rehabilitation of the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Honour; Law; Criminology; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.011074917181053197,"score_gpt":0.22922822752205874,"score_spread":0.21815331034100555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187050213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5789227,0.005367538,0.0077043143,0.10169076,0.0011869983,0.00026395216,0.000032235846,0.000055926357,0.30477557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97448516,0.0014750751,0.0024189556,0.0041429675,0.00014757301,0.000058212354,0.000008297582,0.00001653634,0.017247308],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98878366,0.005098306,0.00029796181,0.00046663213,0.002545616,0.0028078924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338126,0.0025358978,0.0007455135,0.00036425155,0.0018481133,0.0011250683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008809964,0.0002050323,0.00032469857,0.0010624191,0.01831798,0.012284182,0.0016504383,0.004200373,0.001900258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020084806,0.00026805134,0.0003099328,0.00070151227,0.017942164,0.00337513,0.008118694,0.007413572,0.00034828685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042503634,0.000059106373,0.009024254,0.000120239034,0.00001482577,0.0019767703,0.47025353,0.00041672974,0.0009469727,0.4559039,0.011696529,0.049544718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018755241,0.00018583157,0.023253255,0.0015201675,0.00007632216,0.0012631032,0.6140583,0.001408706,0.0018131734,0.10255484,0.25372759,0.00011998175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19277768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29345268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8072223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012604316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030376215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3833112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187887643","doi":"","title":"Employee Pension Rights and the False Promise of Trust Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Fiduciary; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Business; Trust law; Pension plan; Political science","score_opus":0.020904545184424042,"score_gpt":0.27116886865306616,"score_spread":0.25026432346864214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187887643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08537919,0.0070711616,0.031604737,0.36445874,0.000884674,0.00005126537,0.0001711256,0.00012996072,0.5102492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97142226,0.0008563353,0.0012709638,0.013014992,0.00041298923,0.000031537817,0.00002237838,0.000034198278,0.012934285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856468,0.004602314,0.0004743727,0.001390595,0.005063574,0.002822409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98481977,0.009667474,0.000942582,0.0016923836,0.0020297258,0.0008481025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016599217,0.00033317585,0.00053811306,0.0009993636,0.011103249,0.012208401,0.001970195,0.010325057,0.0030722779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0296838,0.0005950176,0.00060490397,0.0007871482,0.05685656,0.01115294,0.005719216,0.012267894,0.00050386577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026232904,0.0000020680811,0.00007057825,0.0000038292756,0.000001360325,0.000030962357,0.0009170104,0.000065461165,0.000017696719,0.9968624,0.0012780027,0.00074811163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002100975,0.000009051438,0.0002746285,0.00009175211,0.000009840434,0.0000643764,0.0011636278,0.00069598126,0.00017525975,0.9490293,0.04844109,0.000024001669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14902565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09760567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14902565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024366634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018884957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29631644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188208345","doi":"","title":"China Officials’ Property Publicity: A Long Way to Go","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; China; Language change; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Political science; Work (physics); Property rights; Element (criminal law); Public administration; Law; Business; Law and economics; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.08568809469109698,"score_gpt":0.39403782259575154,"score_spread":0.30834972790465454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188208345","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08828315,0.08833859,0.0051473468,0.7458316,0.006641522,0.00006065626,0.00027449633,0.00024480026,0.065177836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8392081,0.037876505,0.004865888,0.061207082,0.0038771273,0.00008777948,0.00028954525,0.00011185594,0.052476168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985487,0.00045665965,0.00006893129,0.00020248946,0.00041476998,0.00030847287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965121,0.0008221024,0.00029811126,0.00031535391,0.0012592359,0.0007932163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003528874,0.00043632378,0.00058536226,0.0014218633,0.005445405,0.0072361953,0.00086045574,0.003324162,0.0077109486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003518378,0.0002696403,0.00036943992,0.0023590445,0.010952618,0.0097878035,0.0026629874,0.00523717,0.00097618246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015705203,0.00012007768,0.0135176135,0.0010395788,0.00008382773,0.00082482625,0.022019146,0.0005531747,0.0018724164,0.54574656,0.16219309,0.2518727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037091042,0.0002053895,0.024326237,0.0013366638,0.00006458345,0.0003807632,0.023557665,0.001108481,0.0017963104,0.14054629,0.80640763,0.00023285423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040082857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036691554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040082857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076178317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122101335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0796991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190296521","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Law, Chapter 1 - Introduction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.01013650565671587,"score_gpt":0.2799587554258344,"score_spread":0.26982224976911856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190296521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003593819,0.11396569,0.007858866,0.018939288,0.003967911,0.00008866538,0.0004839403,0.0001714264,0.8509305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1380232,0.11125258,0.00816293,0.014390704,0.0064812885,0.00033290093,0.0011824652,0.0003654314,0.7198085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995196,0.00012218487,0.000021415324,0.00009379529,0.00017891545,0.00006401489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999634,0.0001877557,0.000031024792,0.000031924963,0.00008226528,0.00003311491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004955494,0.0005753082,0.0004196745,0.0011841987,0.0017660956,0.0037853946,0.00086757255,0.0018443387,0.02884782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019823215,0.00034590258,0.00030699992,0.0015420618,0.0027930257,0.0033519873,0.0014494557,0.003133136,0.0070969732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132843625,0.000050422357,0.0003459674,0.00024896674,0.000003559875,0.00008833041,0.0014091864,0.00036964793,0.00019878779,0.72832763,0.22374061,0.04520369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021665392,0.00001693694,0.00052754337,0.0004080843,0.0000019522975,0.00016233162,0.00038046166,0.00013241805,0.00008095596,0.10929739,0.88898414,0.0000055754385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003542182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037810851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02884782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027706744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018333129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09650552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191467437","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.019","title":"Convergence and divergence in the worlds of the trust: duties and liabilities of trustees under the Chinese trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Divergence (linguistics); Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019393527128268074,"score_gpt":0.22741296544726472,"score_spread":0.20801943831899664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191467437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44751072,0.0030158611,0.012452847,0.0100660445,0.000109680426,0.00007166547,0.000062174026,0.000017639459,0.5266934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490213,0.00027362062,0.00044271428,0.00006523538,0.000015613383,0.000020469828,0.000006868955,0.0000045552597,0.0042687366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599874,0.0020029887,0.00014323159,0.0003171226,0.00066881476,0.000869136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973369,0.0012974007,0.00025540902,0.00027235638,0.0004080736,0.00042993232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049436237,0.00032903347,0.0005118157,0.0015359517,0.0062679746,0.008124516,0.00094326556,0.0016713269,0.0030741917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008955754,0.0003225635,0.00036096305,0.0022898025,0.029986905,0.011183219,0.0056991344,0.003405746,0.00019895955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001809003,0.000005280791,0.0006796425,0.000006602897,0.000002861778,0.00005550266,0.02191387,0.00014368547,0.000041637537,0.97360533,0.0003155982,0.0032119215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010530313,0.00002368959,0.0036379942,0.00006748845,0.000013375202,0.00008422166,0.016491808,0.001511478,0.00011161165,0.9698008,0.008228032,0.00001887874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016177163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013235664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016177163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009459079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076816953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068630755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191663734","doi":"10.29173/alr279","title":"The Contractual Principle of Good Faith and the Duty of Honesty in Bhasin v. Hrynew","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; McGill University","keywords":"Honesty; Duty; Good faith; Faith; Law; Supreme court; Fair dealing; Uniform Commercial Code; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.030014734433572596,"score_gpt":0.33940230817950645,"score_spread":0.30938757374593384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191663734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044703472,0.047132775,0.01795767,0.15464744,0.0010404944,0.00017208351,0.00013306133,0.000026431468,0.73418665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9130304,0.013392726,0.004111488,0.021832328,0.0005163092,0.000083851824,0.000054447453,0.000024790761,0.046953667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98600835,0.0042772056,0.00037732653,0.00087441626,0.0059657055,0.0024970619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932916,0.0040801084,0.00059841614,0.00030729984,0.0012266535,0.00049588986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011462561,0.00023008183,0.00044853962,0.0015230987,0.010852517,0.008640043,0.0017437373,0.006236703,0.0021195726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013505314,0.00053030124,0.00040910486,0.002037306,0.03061533,0.0039392724,0.0036472396,0.007212123,0.00025526306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033991616,0.000003410296,0.0001529722,0.000019349887,0.0000018610671,0.000051535862,0.0008558207,0.000083420404,0.00003130877,0.9935998,0.002334288,0.002862884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029922618,0.00002668265,0.0041434276,0.0005412737,0.00002046099,0.00015913417,0.0035118384,0.00070152344,0.00033943958,0.77443624,0.21602426,0.00006577243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.656414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72469306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.656414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036984187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.691219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192778908","doi":"","title":"Unjust Enrichment, Existing Categories and Kerr v. Baranow: A Reply to Professor McInnes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06611391344659903,"score_gpt":0.3715723487003853,"score_spread":0.30545843525378624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192778908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046767577,0.00558995,0.00014188903,0.9845911,0.0018919954,0.0000062918302,0.00001810673,0.000011553658,0.0072814757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021094775,0.002672383,0.00038117607,0.955688,0.0053453697,0.00005042666,0.000014424408,0.000034082663,0.014719296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988725,0.003671963,0.00055311713,0.0027628138,0.002804442,0.0014825477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890437,0.007731658,0.0004474057,0.00043594718,0.0014907765,0.0008504049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012292378,0.0012650827,0.0014201481,0.001685367,0.017778233,0.0098316055,0.008059166,0.079297595,0.006984167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029432371,0.001103908,0.0017697219,0.0015358836,0.03328397,0.018549915,0.007550764,0.06163017,0.0015993462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021271968,0.000021587242,0.00018656428,0.00007412994,0.0000094553525,0.0003672658,0.0047521656,0.000057383564,0.00007836794,0.34716314,0.641041,0.0062276856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058551468,0.0000340952,0.000932254,0.000700314,0.000023864086,0.0004168002,0.007254388,0.00033010624,0.00029132716,0.13918565,0.850646,0.00012669763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17476474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23478734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17476474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021551924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019365164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34749502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195285776","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4711","title":"ARCHITECTURE, RITUALS, AND NORMS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; McGill University","keywords":"Adjudication; Economic Justice; Legitimacy; Dignity; Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Realisation; Civil law (Civil law); Value (mathematics); Public law; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.06755592402990689,"score_gpt":0.36041342655953085,"score_spread":0.29285750252962395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195285776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071963914,0.015900955,0.07344686,0.020370701,0.0005524354,0.00008493552,0.0000549533,0.00015973322,0.8174654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688757,0.0032650207,0.011029728,0.0009496588,0.00027694323,0.00009687517,0.000028141887,0.00006469866,0.015413237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99082184,0.006162669,0.000347493,0.00066937413,0.0014065563,0.0005921095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637324,0.0019946361,0.00048446737,0.00066837564,0.00024507183,0.00023416431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00547095,0.00036357224,0.00031174408,0.0016490858,0.0050817993,0.008823682,0.00093690207,0.002182513,0.0028843377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069852523,0.0002897009,0.00035017024,0.0015329869,0.08034598,0.007734473,0.0050263195,0.0034307258,0.0005525329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028291233,0.0000027256083,0.00010046556,0.0000122292695,0.0000010157306,0.000011650169,0.0032634423,0.00011688926,0.000037999736,0.99193186,0.00029315223,0.004225736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006728971,0.000020803884,0.0010190936,0.00013270351,0.0000035803344,0.00007975507,0.0036831624,0.00036243314,0.00017416172,0.91068053,0.08382202,0.000015026549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005176441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061988947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008823682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038921062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038842792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028933465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196194358","doi":"","title":"Delgamuukw and the Protection of Aboriginal Land Interests","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Power (physics); Mainstream; High Court; Duty","score_opus":0.01578682440849879,"score_gpt":0.2962226893115836,"score_spread":0.2804358649030848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196194358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08118029,0.009195844,0.003074578,0.05728767,0.00028146955,0.00007491206,0.000086982494,0.000048756057,0.8487694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88539225,0.0021132277,0.0023120414,0.013009334,0.00008344852,0.000094818555,0.000026925993,0.000029814648,0.09693811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966897,0.000677615,0.00009725618,0.00039146762,0.00091375015,0.0012301118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849784,0.00066005945,0.00009864865,0.0001134797,0.000433372,0.00019656101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002433009,0.00023069933,0.000331735,0.0011341716,0.014875223,0.005849461,0.0012327173,0.0040479642,0.0042957603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004247801,0.00040011815,0.0003239809,0.0010977251,0.024546357,0.0021549566,0.004794489,0.0038398106,0.00034985377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042817182,0.000004576412,0.00042706385,0.000021444128,0.000002831752,0.00012460879,0.00640394,0.000072752744,0.0001355038,0.98584044,0.0031610325,0.0038015756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038192364,0.00003649847,0.005642114,0.0005342496,0.00003743148,0.00029811336,0.01736535,0.0006932699,0.00066470937,0.49090233,0.48371464,0.00007312811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71693534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80300426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28306466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023175849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036973003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5694634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198599815","doi":"","title":"Rewarding Ownership, Valuing Possessors: Making Sense of Articles 957-962 of the C.C.Q.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Law and economics; Valuation (finance); Legislator; Duty; Economic Justice; Property (philosophy); Civil code; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Accounting; Philosophy; Legislation","score_opus":0.01738419350038584,"score_gpt":0.29232357172789447,"score_spread":0.27493937822750864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198599815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031129265,0.02701021,0.04540772,0.39149502,0.0021092994,0.0001825316,0.00036804168,0.00017767995,0.50212026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85540974,0.010083794,0.021528255,0.048504878,0.0023530317,0.00038407533,0.0001480258,0.00029943013,0.061288826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867077,0.0065085944,0.0005031428,0.0012593701,0.0029865103,0.0020346148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98324054,0.011263402,0.00090884103,0.00084586797,0.0028648684,0.0008764115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018634371,0.0010623954,0.0009542284,0.004101302,0.01969931,0.028756917,0.0047911755,0.017328726,0.0036524346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028875155,0.0011846669,0.00077592954,0.003710031,0.06796429,0.019455597,0.0058656638,0.010158509,0.0005418528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001309216,0.00001039931,0.00027785826,0.00003677026,0.000003871172,0.0001887708,0.013805218,0.00020390523,0.00009470291,0.96811455,0.011359203,0.005891689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023321689,0.000043063115,0.0021315594,0.0010573734,0.00003996102,0.00018508371,0.019929864,0.0017014837,0.0004104578,0.65002114,0.32436275,0.00009391679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44481176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.608736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55518824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058880422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036804482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8844453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203339889","doi":"","title":"Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Where Morguard Stands after Beals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Damages; Statute; Limiting; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011130020030534354,"score_gpt":0.28648607565939616,"score_spread":0.2753560556288618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203339889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18783557,0.006765312,0.015697617,0.2487316,0.0017795494,0.00012091273,0.00015217996,0.00024294088,0.5386743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92654276,0.00097266404,0.0024888897,0.035304427,0.0002721069,0.00003400219,0.000039175076,0.00008485017,0.034261066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98266244,0.0033851997,0.0005766087,0.0029593722,0.0058342204,0.0045822505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845834,0.0066031795,0.0013241973,0.0015327681,0.0046147434,0.0013418474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016560785,0.00032346827,0.0009590097,0.0012673935,0.013388489,0.016268393,0.0028064877,0.009034053,0.004758636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03779518,0.00044355934,0.0010963462,0.0013943904,0.02148793,0.008194604,0.0046987846,0.013369563,0.000766066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006570609,0.000024475703,0.003370163,0.000041565225,0.000021557833,0.0004723661,0.0060716765,0.00019459755,0.000428241,0.96043015,0.0107570905,0.0181224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012486949,0.0002740787,0.014489325,0.0012390879,0.00017640197,0.0010083619,0.021280164,0.0028621426,0.0049552983,0.5240771,0.42917818,0.00033498474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34624285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.405342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34624285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01935883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034442857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.688455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205344416","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511494956.006","title":"The Hague Trusts Convention twenty years on","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Fifteenth; Session (web analytics); Convention; Commission; Law; Political science; State (computer science); International law; History; Business; Classics; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.029708616293013478,"score_gpt":0.24666015807140762,"score_spread":0.21695154177839415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205344416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009540352,0.01160566,0.0009775718,0.009185649,0.0069740824,0.00006596816,0.00047067605,0.00017547578,0.96959084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057201628,0.002050015,0.0003923021,0.0020507826,0.00033609004,0.00005938778,0.00018671917,0.00011153681,0.98909307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946977,0.00080990314,0.00031563704,0.0005944855,0.0025771004,0.0010050689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983878,0.00019988205,0.00009931778,0.00028609807,0.00064538413,0.0003815429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037175012,0.0010535873,0.0007956408,0.0026411028,0.0050869198,0.015290868,0.0021816078,0.008788446,0.09557548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006698842,0.0007214095,0.00075705914,0.0024884583,0.0041912557,0.0069864327,0.005480028,0.0066833985,0.042550586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024425563,0.000029644587,0.00007666091,0.000104562125,0.000004347781,0.00015249172,0.0009826155,0.00010244626,0.00018025617,0.44328898,0.52642274,0.02863083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013395409,0.0000027690126,0.000038007554,0.00005616306,7.201548e-7,0.000014841137,0.00006817243,0.000005345623,0.000026438296,0.0024104642,0.99737155,0.0000041833296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07679453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111380406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09557548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014439864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019063137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31973183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205502416","doi":"","title":"Disputes about Disclosure of Financial Information in Arbitration: Cases and Guidelines","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of employment studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Publishing; Project commissioning; Accounting; Business; Law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.06546266812883465,"score_gpt":0.40948406247575353,"score_spread":0.34402139434691886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205502416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36109617,0.015595331,0.03366727,0.13052852,0.00076600636,0.0012589776,0.00031807722,0.000106536376,0.45666304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636035,0.0041620797,0.012271019,0.0069873794,0.00016372712,0.00031777067,0.00008289757,0.000023563969,0.012388142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90567565,0.032183442,0.006556573,0.0024115858,0.039349627,0.013823053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8673492,0.104723915,0.008226134,0.0032273214,0.014391518,0.0020819078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05249926,0.0006873148,0.0007987505,0.0054448084,0.032160103,0.019201364,0.0043658316,0.01997631,0.0020189888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1346858,0.0007708285,0.0010052037,0.00940614,0.029585559,0.0066498443,0.009227762,0.010423722,0.00028237523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028517012,0.000046473808,0.0030885185,0.00014654716,0.000017666405,0.003612799,0.057851166,0.0014564259,0.00028319075,0.90826416,0.011343452,0.013861046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008788975,0.00006377848,0.014638729,0.0037770728,0.00014533805,0.006675392,0.22307906,0.007028934,0.0027644134,0.33817458,0.40314266,0.00042210743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53981394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.618707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53981394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048923787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047821976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9257924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206302633","doi":"","title":"The Contributory Negligence Act at Seventy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Statute; Law; Plaintiff; Legislation; Political science; Common law; Contributory negligence; Liability","score_opus":0.022451049987480008,"score_gpt":0.3136690229461367,"score_spread":0.2912179729586567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206302633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010183358,0.0035150447,0.0010667248,0.03262243,0.0029026996,0.00012611061,0.0031604478,0.00019973938,0.94622356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14424603,0.0035946146,0.0009907983,0.046998065,0.0005657299,0.00030059804,0.0015091441,0.000076973934,0.801718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956175,0.00028405536,0.00018690378,0.00025977497,0.0020315736,0.0016201474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975406,0.00073054066,0.00018164127,0.00025328516,0.00088049466,0.00041355734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020392188,0.0005212692,0.000375115,0.0014381654,0.0068074223,0.0045569097,0.001231136,0.0060532396,0.014097069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055317483,0.0005820875,0.00043073035,0.0014417197,0.0042362576,0.0014738376,0.0021535626,0.0069885408,0.010349566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017922826,0.000028070677,0.000862184,0.000056932775,0.0000055120045,0.0003657524,0.001561122,0.00021946224,0.00040006186,0.5708676,0.40676194,0.018853385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010502522,0.000015829808,0.0058587585,0.00022602339,0.000009753493,0.00012293426,0.0006241093,0.000097721095,0.00028198416,0.011051214,0.9816527,0.00004854673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62400216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7228075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62400216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015267657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048840918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7564243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207041337","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Deference in Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Australia - Part 1","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Judicial deference; Political science; Administrative law; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.4736815141253664,"score_gpt":0.5166294284328811,"score_spread":0.042947914307514656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207041337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11756693,0.08823601,0.053079993,0.17042862,0.0041308687,0.0005955083,0.000092447284,0.00016499493,0.56570464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93884015,0.00837208,0.00848634,0.018469503,0.002434056,0.00024968208,0.000029283234,0.00003684286,0.02308211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9107704,0.042468116,0.007320558,0.0054771514,0.028462935,0.005500791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9185932,0.048839193,0.007694077,0.005346292,0.016152266,0.003374977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03461004,0.0003803979,0.0006531046,0.0042297756,0.0074629528,0.015628949,0.0034074006,0.010426389,0.001747889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13166071,0.0010929586,0.0005845031,0.0023376388,0.034813836,0.0076111406,0.009195687,0.009715254,0.00034418495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006163333,0.00006348967,0.0038930457,0.0005989128,0.000034359444,0.0017198893,0.029735511,0.00092809874,0.0006409173,0.8651304,0.019771846,0.07742189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009441495,0.00037563575,0.02139683,0.002854558,0.00008231863,0.0038001342,0.006735003,0.004038303,0.0012387296,0.5066844,0.4523588,0.00034071773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053055007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062387474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053055007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017790804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027278312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18303764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207630929","doi":"","title":"Castillo v. Castillo: Closing the Barn Door","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Barn; Political science; Geography; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.018927095808275354,"score_gpt":0.2838200957096416,"score_spread":0.2648929999013663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207630929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038469717,0.0042862026,0.0033298377,0.18251596,0.0022594694,0.00008628239,0.0002953942,0.00012970691,0.76862746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7043354,0.0017359318,0.0021778895,0.11154712,0.00085597025,0.00013732063,0.00016446716,0.000107657426,0.17893822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941104,0.0008079624,0.0001584967,0.00066522363,0.0016798873,0.0025780448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964309,0.001142402,0.00019917793,0.0003504634,0.001132739,0.00074427034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055743004,0.00035440119,0.00059789326,0.0008202396,0.008430857,0.0064974697,0.0027591623,0.012051821,0.008372817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019253643,0.000547935,0.0007743657,0.000601099,0.0055408054,0.004400886,0.0047069807,0.010850582,0.0013589206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012442404,0.00004317694,0.0021975567,0.000073834264,0.000010605565,0.0003820874,0.0022442038,0.00033344407,0.00059037306,0.833236,0.14821362,0.012550633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002446868,0.0000755397,0.0076178173,0.00089332066,0.00010313519,0.00032199055,0.0047042407,0.0017121024,0.0016831476,0.18013224,0.8023389,0.00017280345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4610663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6444083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4610663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009304442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031105826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9167652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208097420","doi":"","title":"Interprovincial Inter-Insurer Interactions: Unifund v. ICBC","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Appeal; Indemnity; Tribunal; Law; Tort; Liability; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02210912419191196,"score_gpt":0.2992141549200961,"score_spread":0.27710503072818415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208097420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18953899,0.0057610017,0.0018475906,0.099413276,0.0005199896,0.00025481277,0.0009353815,0.00012772068,0.7016012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8266227,0.0017157837,0.00062949886,0.06694095,0.00029818312,0.00014569571,0.00023949452,0.00004351357,0.103364065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167925,0.000454922,0.00013719145,0.00061733596,0.0027722607,0.00433885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968105,0.0007360207,0.00017036338,0.0001374114,0.0011158802,0.0010297003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003058779,0.000436241,0.00041404506,0.0013919869,0.02167753,0.007038839,0.0026624317,0.013449631,0.007930232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050902585,0.000920069,0.0008404464,0.0017499462,0.0047369623,0.0016750643,0.0033579615,0.008030658,0.00079476024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037889814,0.00024559099,0.05696982,0.00020668817,0.00023219513,0.011114004,0.033163577,0.001231215,0.0043473896,0.57181895,0.28621253,0.034079134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000339927,0.00020215903,0.11361277,0.00066103524,0.0007956183,0.0029494262,0.02198055,0.0027680143,0.00260045,0.026846772,0.8267999,0.00044332724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9742338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074798994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074798994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08440348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5427072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208978433","doi":"","title":"Forty Years of Restitution: A Retrospective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07136146423138953,"score_gpt":0.31981976211286745,"score_spread":0.2484582978814779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208978433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723974,0.011111031,0.00025596784,0.0015948057,0.00009172346,0.00009350222,0.0050238674,0.000025197143,0.009406501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820517,0.008560915,0.00010155856,0.00084480096,0.0001236106,0.000112978574,0.0040151314,0.00003996214,0.004149422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972721,0.00051447516,0.00041471008,0.00031800475,0.0005385009,0.0009421881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807747,0.0042616534,0.0073838346,0.0014545625,0.0035488964,0.0025764215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023963102,0.00021148572,0.000526996,0.005370711,0.002497033,0.0020759047,0.001327576,0.0015785919,0.005929484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014204066,0.000554411,0.00082429755,0.005884485,0.0015280516,0.002404271,0.002840055,0.0029354205,0.0016939928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003686757,0.00023968163,0.96700245,0.00017423478,0.000090937494,0.0018782136,0.0073873806,0.000117786956,0.000118832984,0.0014043612,0.0035540168,0.017663404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007245725,0.00024737074,0.96295285,0.0004153678,0.00009036747,0.002460215,0.011001089,0.000056218905,0.00015682657,0.00027929724,0.022287915,0.00004508902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03433628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0392425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03433628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021004234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035800883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06827283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221102024","doi":"","title":"Improving the Potential of Tort Law for Redressing Historical Abuse Claims: The Need for a Contextualized Approach to the Limitation Defence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Dignity; Law; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Autonomy; Sociology; Abuse of power; Criminology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.024079421313549728,"score_gpt":0.2932727310826629,"score_spread":0.26919330976911315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221102024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11418614,0.022110773,0.19537221,0.19410042,0.00096032146,0.00064939377,0.000114354414,0.0002960785,0.47221035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95033586,0.0031688267,0.035552006,0.0068560527,0.00026064948,0.0002704524,0.000022934584,0.00004699552,0.0034860817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680865,0.02103072,0.0014047266,0.0018159124,0.0050747395,0.002587485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544501,0.03314051,0.0030907327,0.004919454,0.0033188225,0.0010804144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03780288,0.0007047756,0.0011260101,0.0034979307,0.012756767,0.01881476,0.0038520633,0.010392506,0.002642789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051627535,0.00095559127,0.0013483404,0.0017153731,0.057309926,0.020541621,0.011916857,0.011249206,0.000401283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011400063,0.000020538164,0.00097351125,0.00012796909,0.00001959298,0.00027873827,0.012780489,0.0019280952,0.0004563717,0.96580416,0.00094368187,0.016655393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031098232,0.000099154175,0.0033211776,0.0017475442,0.00007228453,0.00048187046,0.029582947,0.0021203,0.0009810256,0.8790097,0.08239491,0.00015788243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037149396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060832985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03780288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015902705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028758371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1999231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211739506","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book II","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.01973903706394781,"score_gpt":0.2897390159004482,"score_spread":0.2699999788365004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211739506","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010743566,0.2067768,0.0031224142,0.46244475,0.071458295,0.00016199557,0.0032462662,0.0002626637,0.25145248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019613132,0.050631374,0.0024703462,0.27642533,0.04235262,0.000489056,0.0011035025,0.00054559053,0.6063691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794143,0.0004815511,0.0001561776,0.0002514055,0.0009906763,0.00017866361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893383,0.008321486,0.00025943472,0.00025319782,0.0016372824,0.00019029985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003149145,0.00079769926,0.00087559124,0.0042433054,0.0048823003,0.0050788876,0.0020723548,0.0096351765,0.048144624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01745106,0.00082355604,0.0006502049,0.0035758892,0.004841868,0.0074411323,0.0020419746,0.0099095665,0.014828513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076744,0.000005665038,0.000043258155,0.00010337089,0.0000021982366,0.000022885495,0.00026815746,0.000025051997,0.000033101576,0.034473587,0.9611697,0.0038453438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008540204,0.0000072320413,0.0006365399,0.0005707825,0.000004082224,0.000033005857,0.00041123762,0.000038820333,0.000062087034,0.020976335,0.977236,0.000015478492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050753903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09603211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050753903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00620879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047915233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16105974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213204439","doi":"","title":"Conceptualising the rights of a lessee under the personal property securities regime: The challenge of 'new learning' for Australian lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Personal property; Collateral; Lease; Statutory law; Project commissioning; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Publishing; Law and economics; Settlor; Business; Property (philosophy); Law; Common law; Property law; Property rights; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.11436841202167895,"score_gpt":0.27733304086971866,"score_spread":0.1629646288480397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213204439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14369534,0.0028440757,0.052034233,0.11939492,0.00025601304,0.00014740381,0.00006399942,0.000046177527,0.68151796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689971,0.0006697329,0.004401607,0.006037619,0.00014851769,0.00008137857,0.000010795184,0.000014141395,0.019639103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105656,0.0038226724,0.00035042266,0.0010556201,0.0020578227,0.0016568826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99288017,0.0041660503,0.00072909414,0.0007050642,0.0007868245,0.00073284184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012211555,0.00030666086,0.0005122003,0.0012480185,0.007998755,0.012166439,0.002714659,0.012215402,0.003663778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013661101,0.0004907608,0.0006227879,0.0009927333,0.07648151,0.015041611,0.009293921,0.011080622,0.00038245285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002106705,0.0000035600103,0.00013482002,0.0000066450593,7.2111385e-7,0.00006607394,0.005874693,0.00007969399,0.000055428256,0.9926521,0.0002486013,0.0008755717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016432155,0.000029978353,0.0009273675,0.00019287532,0.000011692819,0.000188055,0.007888007,0.0012282277,0.00026634138,0.91512185,0.07409841,0.000030789204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06812693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05323365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06812693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01313212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01477012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13546073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213989475","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5214","title":"Informal Land Titles: Snowden v Baker (1844)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Statutory law; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); High Court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014406159355908586,"score_gpt":0.26081987261241735,"score_spread":0.24641371325650877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213989475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16215737,0.01751157,0.0028653909,0.035190895,0.00095485605,0.0001594069,0.00046734483,0.000044744116,0.78064835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7321208,0.006516959,0.0019906731,0.036134306,0.0007945518,0.00019574765,0.00017869083,0.000035770998,0.22203256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975568,0.0004849175,0.00011471693,0.00029621331,0.00087154843,0.0006757345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854255,0.0007272095,0.00022766144,0.0000710507,0.0003087435,0.00012266875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022317308,0.0002173856,0.00024947646,0.001098132,0.0042150514,0.0029280821,0.0008361867,0.004767978,0.0034948045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058739134,0.00036297672,0.00025652003,0.0013000086,0.007246486,0.0017068019,0.0020119594,0.0026729654,0.00055274466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031235646,0.000014534877,0.0034446125,0.00011949845,0.000009011252,0.0013284781,0.014010867,0.00016333112,0.00028468046,0.87738335,0.08196051,0.021249859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040604933,0.00005538805,0.016143465,0.0005529873,0.000023195995,0.00064763374,0.0034837641,0.00011428177,0.00046255573,0.058120508,0.92030525,0.00005029868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24397095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3731343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24397095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064697852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008547106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4851017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216790139","doi":"","title":"Kingstreet Investments: Taking a Pass on the Defence of Passing On","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.060847476666265464,"score_gpt":0.2882164871328169,"score_spread":0.22736901046655142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216790139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04838112,0.0026958676,0.007965067,0.1734395,0.0010858861,0.00015825841,0.00035168772,0.000100451376,0.7658223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77862054,0.0009272802,0.003983268,0.0715786,0.0005033899,0.00014247716,0.000098790966,0.00006566121,0.14407994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823628,0.0037815294,0.00093635666,0.0023481697,0.0065718046,0.003999292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820484,0.0066332715,0.0008694899,0.0015358295,0.0021529247,0.0006035813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009565166,0.0005448779,0.0007110752,0.0007660825,0.007201076,0.013064581,0.0026844407,0.022265373,0.006573846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032197148,0.0007899398,0.0008429262,0.0010449502,0.016405718,0.005489954,0.0037780902,0.01586618,0.0012032356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016222883,0.000004857336,0.00052712613,0.000019528414,0.000009715863,0.0001515943,0.0016443687,0.00009467233,0.00012760141,0.9750567,0.019854546,0.0024930483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115574265,0.00012832702,0.0058037047,0.0006639388,0.00011495309,0.00059857644,0.004074244,0.0018550516,0.0023894482,0.5257078,0.45832956,0.00021882167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3173079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3622675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3173079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017532786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020236304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6309219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218134711","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1366242","title":"Judicial Independence and the Politics of Depoliticization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.008714457242379823,"score_gpt":0.28881116306605037,"score_spread":0.2800967058236705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218134711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1454238,0.0027432153,0.0058759092,0.0555118,0.00026908558,0.000052032156,0.00015072282,0.000036853282,0.7899365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790148,0.00031903194,0.00026216035,0.003787462,0.0003241564,0.00003486878,0.000023007371,0.00002354736,0.016210882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961055,0.00306574,0.00025884074,0.001567945,0.0017952617,0.0037016773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811426,0.011142495,0.0022623765,0.0019463365,0.0019449966,0.001561234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011259074,0.00030667143,0.0013005252,0.0022354745,0.011723191,0.012201407,0.0017665917,0.009277365,0.011183229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022486111,0.00066077197,0.00071293535,0.0024518778,0.032457933,0.004985353,0.006963661,0.0145026585,0.0011864111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017575274,0.000016483304,0.00031671132,0.000006250971,0.00000501203,0.000041645668,0.00063236884,0.000090794456,0.000056484696,0.9956418,0.001997839,0.0011769324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081235026,0.000019550436,0.002720144,0.000044785,0.000020905143,0.0000608796,0.00094722223,0.0004327771,0.00032463006,0.96586466,0.029461108,0.000022074506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011273619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012592576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012201407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006087756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008406134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059544384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218884785","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of the Extraterritorial Mareva Injunction in Canada: Three Issues","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Federalism; Position (finance); Balance (ability); Exclusive jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.005348079234409895,"score_gpt":0.2357542079788718,"score_spread":0.23040612874446192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218884785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44481474,0.007441309,0.0062698843,0.081547394,0.0003629883,0.00020765736,0.00062483293,0.00016818465,0.45856303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524318,0.0015747214,0.0023678998,0.0058762706,0.00006075678,0.000028933007,0.000083725856,0.000045250057,0.037530683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929705,0.0003764463,0.00016541149,0.00066644757,0.0028028365,0.0030183892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551964,0.0007643311,0.00027585574,0.00017897403,0.0022102,0.0010510575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021557277,0.00030347006,0.0005255505,0.0024695648,0.015307261,0.010095031,0.0024691406,0.004116809,0.006108779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007620348,0.00053215196,0.00075330003,0.0026689502,0.010485831,0.0023032476,0.0031799825,0.00618934,0.00022657473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006233524,0.000058827325,0.01539516,0.00008338211,0.000036654084,0.0009825474,0.008898534,0.0018103987,0.0016650258,0.92460173,0.012407015,0.033998374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016788032,0.00020902632,0.21804644,0.0007183653,0.0002900582,0.0016262918,0.036654312,0.0073185787,0.004232085,0.0891643,0.64091235,0.00066021126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15987411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15987411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15116265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9744269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222022887","doi":"","title":"The Enron Pension Jigsaw: Assembling Accountable Corporate Governance by Fiduciaries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Pension; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Business; Accounting; Shareholder; Pension fund; Investment (military); Duty; Control (management); Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science; Law; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.040623449978463656,"score_gpt":0.30070219889471994,"score_spread":0.26007874891625626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222022887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4525119,0.003214149,0.34143016,0.016156456,0.0004336278,0.0003878949,0.00005784393,0.00034523243,0.1854627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968255,0.00046483113,0.08669228,0.000515442,0.00008334551,0.00013208439,0.000037424623,0.000053303338,0.015195739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993687,0.0036890975,0.00032802907,0.0006778472,0.00090715796,0.0007109179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578357,0.0016527005,0.0007229898,0.0009335995,0.00041761156,0.00048949476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011844835,0.00028114705,0.00041233265,0.0018665243,0.0049319603,0.006596596,0.00074620923,0.0015285929,0.0030521962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017775003,0.00049952936,0.000387854,0.0010247427,0.009053125,0.007221173,0.0071520163,0.0018285451,0.00029032523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022134918,0.000027658649,0.004801875,0.00003096777,0.000010914142,0.00024519343,0.0110069,0.0019914638,0.0005841368,0.92089283,0.0018531539,0.05853271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026473843,0.00008087656,0.0074856146,0.00022478208,0.000024865365,0.00024165209,0.0081615355,0.008667736,0.0014002626,0.79265326,0.1809922,0.00004084153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058478536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008558663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011844835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027606427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041377605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06264222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222545235","doi":"","title":"Private Law Responses to Domestic Violence: The Intersection of Family Law and Tort","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Domestic violence; Law; Spouse; Redress; Damages; Harm; Political science; Misconduct; Supreme court; Poison control; Liability; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.01333438866778492,"score_gpt":0.319522238131186,"score_spread":0.3061878494634011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222545235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.250331,0.014648007,0.02528018,0.14266618,0.0006098207,0.00007500351,0.000043457665,0.00005300084,0.5662935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98631763,0.0021895769,0.0009701729,0.00322582,0.00025618187,0.000029312365,0.0000058133464,0.0000096515,0.006995769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458635,0.003060605,0.0001532471,0.00029578,0.000929978,0.0009739396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935082,0.0043915594,0.0008461372,0.00048663237,0.00038559834,0.0003818904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037160108,0.0001889489,0.00036203206,0.0015644282,0.0061759767,0.007154228,0.00081253384,0.006001004,0.005072749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007807381,0.00031341828,0.00043288045,0.0007694891,0.03382818,0.005638205,0.0056858044,0.0030379896,0.00020481895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008864586,0.000037598416,0.0018246832,0.000028731918,0.000007324742,0.0005720063,0.014188575,0.00023345466,0.00012582181,0.97047496,0.0016205715,0.010877493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002114519,0.00011061919,0.015535383,0.0005381384,0.00002690347,0.0023540892,0.052019376,0.0013546111,0.00052731764,0.77586824,0.15159035,0.00005379583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011579197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013591576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011579197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045221057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036805035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03281027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222910444","doi":"","title":"The Strict Character of Fiduciary Liability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Prudence; Liability; Law and economics; Character (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Business; Strict liability; Limited liability; Unintended consequences; Law; Economics; Political science; Duty; Accounting; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0066898590433361466,"score_gpt":0.26776454774162994,"score_spread":0.2610746886982938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222910444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068662375,0.0054090517,0.07742463,0.3698196,0.0028183418,0.00022383781,0.00040730104,0.00021604382,0.4750187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8428158,0.0013016583,0.010006627,0.12588848,0.001892432,0.0002850616,0.00010503463,0.00006139953,0.017643446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.953513,0.016668722,0.0047095767,0.005576498,0.014305544,0.005226658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9301854,0.04192696,0.004901362,0.011161004,0.010202261,0.0016229535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034835584,0.00038688723,0.0011286809,0.0013238165,0.00620049,0.0078033,0.0029777777,0.013854988,0.0036654146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09747265,0.0006774657,0.0013140874,0.0011392202,0.02856589,0.008068561,0.0059337914,0.017179107,0.0011550813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016240618,0.000008528856,0.000544581,0.0000500555,0.000012384987,0.000068646645,0.0012138516,0.00018183852,0.00016095181,0.9848881,0.0096766865,0.0031781264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043618656,0.00007439879,0.0038125322,0.00047862067,0.000035814366,0.00031026144,0.001252174,0.0010635594,0.0010284383,0.8948024,0.09700193,0.00009620659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008597894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006437819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034835584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044732867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059785023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18423045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223518421","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495243.004","title":"Property, personality and unfair competition in England and Wales, Australia and Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Intangible property; Political science; Supreme court; Ingenuity; Unfair competition; Legislative history; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.035400331544188854,"score_gpt":0.23134317872317517,"score_spread":0.1959428471789863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223518421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5481315,0.039888557,0.0006083084,0.014221917,0.00048801472,0.00007460838,0.0004286661,0.00003421184,0.39612412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82170355,0.012764023,0.0005431011,0.001288039,0.000043479777,0.000028648568,0.00012120547,0.000027864658,0.16348004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900526,0.0001528337,0.00003070426,0.0000754231,0.00034296993,0.0003928163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880457,0.00026142446,0.00008176748,0.000038231872,0.0003534045,0.00046061218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079043594,0.00032084383,0.00042053254,0.0025502113,0.010847691,0.0065365983,0.0008495564,0.0012004445,0.0054959347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019407397,0.00027850663,0.00021443378,0.0061878944,0.009288276,0.0017906015,0.0019668497,0.0018287139,0.00035555183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000819934,0.000095008385,0.019043036,0.00026161977,0.000026262205,0.0021326672,0.24036443,0.0010435571,0.00039058598,0.5890515,0.045321442,0.10218793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017175676,0.00005274758,0.15761612,0.0005846244,0.000023875467,0.00078436604,0.1443358,0.001028395,0.00025300105,0.02646886,0.6686903,0.00014472513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99270177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08863049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08863049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073378295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64306223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224385200","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.015","title":"The compatibility of the trust with the civil law notion of property","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.026969559456691602,"score_gpt":0.21265422617623528,"score_spread":0.18568466671954367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224385200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065108086,0.0076204194,0.04681713,0.017800465,0.00051659887,0.000030134399,0.00011490562,0.000036389847,0.9205531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8464503,0.0077671558,0.015627047,0.0034116402,0.001929492,0.0002213196,0.00010927617,0.00013192552,0.12435185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964952,0.0018622597,0.00016481527,0.00037339726,0.000857894,0.00024643267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963768,0.0025232139,0.00022441919,0.0004777953,0.00028175596,0.000116105926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031373564,0.00044834017,0.0007185524,0.0012102368,0.0026596743,0.008103222,0.0010696052,0.0049693915,0.009365808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008809685,0.0005764763,0.00061296544,0.0017396392,0.027120695,0.012850325,0.0025650677,0.006239526,0.0016404002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.621415e-7,8.983339e-7,0.0000061223527,0.000003284935,4.1202807e-7,0.0000059933755,0.00010729342,0.000020824049,0.000007088547,0.9988066,0.0004388418,0.0006017413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025030492,0.000002471327,0.00003496767,0.000017409022,0.0000010131787,0.000023504792,0.00005982597,0.000116997246,0.000027086273,0.9851989,0.014513255,0.0000020137384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005073534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003606347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009365808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039370935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002807247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031331718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224405444","doi":"","title":"Punishing Contract Breakers: Whiten v Pilot Insurance and the Sea Change in Canadian Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Te Mata Koi : Auckland University Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Tort; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Law and economics; Malice; Business; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.0374745736079705,"score_gpt":0.27500955051536646,"score_spread":0.23753497690739597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224405444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061649505,0.39221668,0.0018994138,0.10388242,0.00133317,0.00018710319,0.00044121564,0.000035066678,0.43835533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78651065,0.1466959,0.0014750371,0.02546539,0.00037879302,0.00007934136,0.00019613346,0.000024723244,0.039174117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933728,0.0011262546,0.00020842218,0.00036466937,0.00378012,0.0011478524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945162,0.002322515,0.0005360334,0.00013147708,0.0022075204,0.0002862916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049137855,0.00024581017,0.00032474188,0.0032947047,0.0065967054,0.00478004,0.0012777573,0.0026263688,0.0030241408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011468321,0.00026549416,0.00027038815,0.0054868595,0.008511428,0.0017344127,0.0011209708,0.0024064484,0.00014268851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054575044,0.00005567862,0.008565235,0.0014943419,0.000059339713,0.0007908454,0.009449825,0.0013556706,0.0003205948,0.74903643,0.09452822,0.13428922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042316966,0.00007459326,0.0755077,0.0040355898,0.00016821333,0.00036650914,0.013313277,0.0013372044,0.00057936914,0.045817178,0.8585863,0.0001716921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97806233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98832047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08330361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08330361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12045003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6044128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W222559358","doi":"","title":"Justifying the Law of Unjust Enrichment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Restitution; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02342716744782826,"score_gpt":0.31869361267601937,"score_spread":0.2952664452281911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W222559358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02560853,0.003108166,0.06296171,0.19484462,0.002354067,0.00022769232,0.00021098983,0.00018642051,0.7104978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88198704,0.00092903484,0.014432451,0.052162327,0.0023145748,0.00051185413,0.0000799964,0.00016401926,0.04741873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809457,0.007141831,0.000927011,0.0033525338,0.0049703913,0.0026625048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761439,0.014251258,0.001568692,0.0043652183,0.00282775,0.00084313686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022282053,0.0008156473,0.002088663,0.0022388613,0.007923175,0.009622072,0.0032656686,0.023142047,0.008267695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046809085,0.0009300302,0.0013839067,0.0010044398,0.055027924,0.011229022,0.008580138,0.018883543,0.0012601531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063268403,0.0000071305117,0.00004903387,0.000009595638,0.0000042618817,0.00001807075,0.000099207704,0.00011729882,0.000016406117,0.99746764,0.0014649725,0.0007400823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016617245,0.0000045791353,0.000046533605,0.000030473424,0.0000054293496,0.000014540713,0.00006341142,0.00027629168,0.00007046409,0.98942137,0.010044207,0.000006139985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074578156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075405077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023142047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065344097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01022821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11784017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225736545","doi":"","title":"The Duty to Consult and Accommodate: Procedural Justice as Aboriginal Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Procedural justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Procedural law; Due process; Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Psychology; Municipal law; Geography","score_opus":0.011559240527301774,"score_gpt":0.32038238733454477,"score_spread":0.308823146807243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225736545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041679885,0.011934758,0.10635866,0.16873044,0.0010690201,0.00017315721,0.000059085894,0.00008264419,0.6699124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923406,0.0035415543,0.020170035,0.015950922,0.0007220351,0.0001817284,0.000027335107,0.000059343583,0.03594105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97523206,0.012353855,0.0008752963,0.0018273406,0.0069886376,0.0027227525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98890406,0.006475693,0.0009474695,0.001359321,0.0016240247,0.00068944535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02240964,0.000336824,0.00062820985,0.0014100489,0.012909215,0.012320765,0.0024505216,0.0104338555,0.0022997842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021155218,0.00042036918,0.000788593,0.0014180506,0.078641035,0.009413599,0.008188975,0.010372737,0.0004102241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013156487,0.0000026756222,0.00005130429,0.0000073813558,9.2801685e-7,0.000025747277,0.0027960376,0.00006309067,0.000034116107,0.9952173,0.00038304855,0.0014170764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066465013,0.000017532488,0.00056632276,0.00021021666,0.000007668227,0.00011897307,0.0034034338,0.00046951714,0.00020475898,0.90943533,0.08552991,0.000029740717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113638826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.107636705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113638826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017329132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03367607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22595471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226278872","doi":"","title":"The Concept and Conceptions of Intellectual Property as Seen Through the Lens of Property","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Phenomenon; Property law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Property rights; Public law","score_opus":0.024303659435860096,"score_gpt":0.29716919400220015,"score_spread":0.27286553456634005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226278872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030554963,0.017632414,0.09923213,0.06771182,0.00090915506,0.00014002186,0.00035354035,0.00015133292,0.7833145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93296224,0.0062783295,0.020117495,0.0040492006,0.0007160295,0.00025134685,0.00014241542,0.00014064553,0.03534228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942064,0.003336581,0.000111257505,0.0005480074,0.0010392567,0.00075838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945422,0.0031140915,0.00043316014,0.00086043886,0.0006516167,0.00039847422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061847223,0.0009381004,0.0006058424,0.005379542,0.009137494,0.020688135,0.0029411176,0.004234773,0.0071048466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065763686,0.00035829758,0.0009821067,0.0061487625,0.10094953,0.024366362,0.00490935,0.0067939046,0.0007780627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011905848,0.0000021095682,0.000033565146,0.000010489979,8.604641e-7,0.000022081862,0.0028026444,0.00004984465,0.000017169104,0.99575543,0.00050853274,0.0007961355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049643245,0.0000091618695,0.00030103992,0.00014882538,0.000004214534,0.00009469882,0.006559581,0.0006049009,0.00008190742,0.8935578,0.09862059,0.0000123939035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08214546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044028793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08214546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027061682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00969851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19634718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227159011","doi":"","title":"Coercive Relief - Reflections on Supervision and Enforcement Constraints","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Scope (computer science); Remedial education; Orthodoxy; Preference; Law and economics; Political science; Law enforcement; Empirical research; Law; Business; Economics; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.13852183605349747,"score_gpt":0.4004734201286882,"score_spread":0.2619515840751907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227159011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21535888,0.005662383,0.056796808,0.12313032,0.00046818936,0.00024320612,0.00011022957,0.000084681335,0.59814537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904612,0.00044751697,0.0016770535,0.002435645,0.00013987748,0.00006986896,0.000006548773,0.000017414482,0.0047448166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690542,0.01305356,0.0015816884,0.0024579247,0.0096202735,0.004232345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97207505,0.016989114,0.0033331306,0.0028247233,0.00335713,0.0014208152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021117738,0.00029449124,0.0007359845,0.0014731025,0.0070165154,0.006732928,0.0025634225,0.004500614,0.0041810647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03809455,0.0004317945,0.0004281299,0.001056164,0.04997281,0.0054259654,0.006517872,0.0077383826,0.00027394228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071133813,0.000012156228,0.000744124,0.000027449769,0.0000052533737,0.00008226104,0.004153208,0.0002615632,0.00011183575,0.9899458,0.00076885324,0.0038803283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053104468,0.00006315953,0.0070627416,0.0006603836,0.000016775033,0.00031926832,0.009965406,0.001619215,0.0007268946,0.9089391,0.07051433,0.000059580456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032274194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03406866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032274194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008954866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012529696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111682594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227516896","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1138","title":"Peoples, BCE, and the Good Corporate \"Citizen\"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Expansive; Corporation; Law; Deference; Statutory law; Discretion; Legislature; Corporate law; Shareholder; Corporate title; Political science; Corporate governance; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02470828335850687,"score_gpt":0.27540565853192944,"score_spread":0.25069737517342255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227516896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039232496,0.009410018,0.0043437285,0.2256315,0.0008449517,0.000048941936,0.000054476553,0.000040293457,0.72039354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83273196,0.0031612632,0.0015272882,0.05509294,0.0003274842,0.00004336601,0.000023581873,0.000026633226,0.10706545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496657,0.001359764,0.00010563198,0.0005191057,0.0015910674,0.0014578903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997938,0.000707207,0.00017862945,0.00015488088,0.00047097073,0.00055030506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003877411,0.00021729959,0.00029395826,0.0009179115,0.015326348,0.008965617,0.00072094076,0.0055706645,0.003067751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048593176,0.00023043531,0.00022859318,0.0007705894,0.04154014,0.0034670066,0.0035617237,0.0053010425,0.00028151745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021240871,0.0000032693115,0.00029349132,0.000007024381,0.0000010457094,0.00004944101,0.0034873653,0.000018753668,0.00003704165,0.9884682,0.0051643294,0.002467878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021255171,0.000017770526,0.002849889,0.00023270055,0.000014040011,0.00016133553,0.011611002,0.0001225557,0.00027234902,0.3167421,0.6679158,0.0000391489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5057793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6733063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5057793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018016571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032419633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99426246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229243899","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.013","title":"The framing of a European law of trusts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02696284383109111,"score_gpt":0.22713926985631874,"score_spread":0.20017642602522764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229243899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0362756,0.015007585,0.060858216,0.08651306,0.0047625764,0.000107367254,0.00010939273,0.00011093997,0.79625535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8743327,0.004943566,0.014121507,0.02599496,0.0015141671,0.00024310953,0.0001032016,0.00013518288,0.07861163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735788,0.013379644,0.0016718128,0.0029519268,0.0052593453,0.0031583817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99137163,0.004360831,0.00083579036,0.0012349725,0.0015826977,0.0006140628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0217406,0.0006575408,0.00079948653,0.0023109403,0.0072522033,0.020247778,0.001785756,0.014322327,0.0034093845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027398484,0.00065114256,0.0013629606,0.0020316753,0.035354037,0.016972838,0.009135788,0.011758234,0.00075864873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016558896,0.0000014386385,0.000018489818,0.000004329827,6.757034e-7,0.000021688153,0.00079063425,0.000038667848,0.000012357655,0.9976514,0.0007085865,0.00075012783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017102475,0.00003076799,0.0003932675,0.00036898517,0.000015198061,0.00022981418,0.0025542066,0.0005306436,0.00022092825,0.6832457,0.3123412,0.000052137053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011890515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006723349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0217406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014166651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0105955135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114976645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229554846","doi":"10.29173/alr1257","title":"Supreme Court Restates Directors' Fiduciary Duty - A Comment on Peoples Department Stores v. Wise","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Supreme court; Law; Duty; Shareholder; Corporation; Corporate law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Business judgment rule; Sociology; Economics; Corporate governance; Management","score_opus":0.04065132440687232,"score_gpt":0.32385266370803756,"score_spread":0.28320133930116526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229554846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027640685,0.018799016,0.0012167777,0.6435374,0.0086421715,0.00011734968,0.0010587465,0.00017051562,0.29881728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20792665,0.004855943,0.0007057422,0.6833179,0.0042886767,0.000108287095,0.00025917866,0.00013834078,0.09839936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98661345,0.0013228982,0.0004357403,0.001723117,0.0053567877,0.004547936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899421,0.0054492024,0.0004007017,0.00025238894,0.0028757977,0.0010799156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075859632,0.0009346718,0.0014022579,0.0018923681,0.032989074,0.014570825,0.0059746127,0.04193824,0.005117833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018747738,0.00188514,0.0019534335,0.0026308442,0.013569308,0.0032022689,0.003273166,0.029819347,0.0012744543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005247945,0.000033725886,0.0015545032,0.00009166571,0.000037379035,0.0010741017,0.005303424,0.00035030788,0.00055629946,0.40953657,0.5768624,0.0045472067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010544617,0.0000494886,0.0056048394,0.0006058288,0.00015181294,0.00024544622,0.0047107073,0.00067538564,0.0012821105,0.029840723,0.95647585,0.00025243097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89648277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94097227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89648277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06459601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060302496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46867907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230719886","doi":"","title":"혼합법계의 발견과 주요 혼합법계 국가의 법체계","year":2008,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"외법논집","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Jurisdiction; Private law; Common law; Comparative law; Political science; Public law; Legal history; Possession (linguistics); Sovereignty; Municipal law; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05433233463430178,"score_gpt":0.3195578343718433,"score_spread":0.26522549973754156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230719886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053416174,0.0029048675,0.03809268,0.03037424,0.0012067091,0.000120539495,0.00020271914,0.00015646467,0.8735256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8544267,0.0007446867,0.011994932,0.0052920356,0.00039052335,0.00018177352,0.00012614197,0.00009403067,0.12674919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818546,0.00054706814,0.00004154307,0.00034105263,0.0005503628,0.00033457013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989668,0.00023740293,0.0001237701,0.00019975302,0.00028292407,0.00018934903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007787113,0.00024851353,0.00023158349,0.0006298916,0.005626414,0.0074846996,0.0007039718,0.0018366684,0.0078588035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024817996,0.00017160017,0.00040078658,0.0006972472,0.012483914,0.004357466,0.003382023,0.003702898,0.0017174508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000954871,0.000005959126,0.0010589937,0.000013645755,0.0000033462245,0.00012739387,0.006038394,0.000043839405,0.00018668378,0.9727721,0.010216554,0.009523479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009695223,0.000042284326,0.003903771,0.00010102915,0.0000128380225,0.0011635278,0.009668789,0.00077315205,0.000654859,0.35049063,0.6331403,0.000039102917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011431044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00823183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011431044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024221083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029790648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026290357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230968116","doi":"","title":"The personal property security interest: Identifying some essential attributes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Statutory law; Acknowledgement; Database transaction; Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Project commissioning; Personal property; Common law; Publishing; Business; Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05614441770730251,"score_gpt":0.32738267820091127,"score_spread":0.2712382604936088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230968116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17194238,0.003296275,0.048345715,0.030146686,0.0001858041,0.00023227044,0.00024701632,0.00005411108,0.7455497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775989,0.0009649302,0.006081147,0.0011301024,0.00007534023,0.000063642685,0.000042970783,0.000017231041,0.014025836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540234,0.0013132826,0.00019870761,0.0004799536,0.0015203314,0.0010853087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961014,0.0018177202,0.00044820987,0.00039237097,0.0009035887,0.00033661118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005034902,0.00032363238,0.0004112504,0.0026657067,0.0065052835,0.009616166,0.0014903998,0.004219874,0.0034642466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070769074,0.00029951267,0.00065026496,0.0028925817,0.04450585,0.011618798,0.005873017,0.0070688073,0.00032649087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028107183,0.0000023739199,0.00051720545,0.000010991812,7.636198e-7,0.00007796655,0.003967001,0.00006017312,0.000066440625,0.99338806,0.00018838537,0.0017178073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010890624,0.000035983423,0.011624174,0.0003719608,0.000025014668,0.00067593186,0.029052958,0.0016025228,0.001110679,0.8486407,0.10678675,0.00006243159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13931605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19361675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13931605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017050702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01469155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27701026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231547810","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5412","title":"The State of Judicial Scrutiny of Public Contracting in New Zealand and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Procurement; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Public administration; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Public law; Government procurement; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.023303310904248944,"score_gpt":0.2576232751249873,"score_spread":0.23431996422073834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231547810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37389615,0.05003474,0.00173164,0.16009368,0.0008129372,0.00024847116,0.00045924212,0.00010148442,0.41262165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96998066,0.008966927,0.0008772095,0.008205852,0.0002395597,0.00004839375,0.00008789181,0.000032616692,0.011560866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9634482,0.0033699763,0.0015623168,0.0029306184,0.020446038,0.008242765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508177,0.01897331,0.0053298,0.0018190283,0.019688878,0.0033712497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015714679,0.00029848015,0.0009348833,0.0059805796,0.019368533,0.017773371,0.004150404,0.006866327,0.0036857266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07243038,0.0008539277,0.00080550654,0.007050364,0.02066061,0.0031390942,0.003855501,0.0067975125,0.0001707078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028784267,0.000108407105,0.02669001,0.000881038,0.00028621987,0.0023346073,0.041844636,0.0021784615,0.002900841,0.74884886,0.060188185,0.11345102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026291292,0.00015637564,0.2099848,0.0028353098,0.0005321553,0.0008632433,0.041901674,0.0035945717,0.0027857546,0.060090624,0.67618227,0.00081026217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98611337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98984736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15226677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15226677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18710765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232708363","doi":"","title":"Governor in Council Appointments: During Pleasure or Just a Big Headache?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Pleasure; Law; Hostility; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Psychology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.08009486195053896,"score_gpt":0.29729269359291216,"score_spread":0.21719783164237322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232708363","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22609071,0.007590806,0.002637756,0.4257791,0.0044533303,0.000060447852,0.00013988689,0.00009639396,0.3331515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93297666,0.0012524787,0.00029471592,0.018344965,0.001550633,0.000026802923,0.00003163944,0.000036727568,0.045485392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956591,0.0013461396,0.00009993651,0.0004012695,0.00049647584,0.0019970783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955888,0.0014327489,0.0004503059,0.00019801229,0.00026116194,0.0020691198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003415511,0.00013466031,0.00041997066,0.0004617381,0.013409461,0.0070961765,0.001016399,0.005110443,0.008800645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009023486,0.00029331102,0.0002601351,0.0009446893,0.013962149,0.0065506743,0.0047791717,0.006649624,0.0009012007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018114485,0.00011000653,0.014357383,0.00011816685,0.000014157773,0.0022672385,0.08381719,0.00008665296,0.00045149532,0.6589961,0.20185626,0.03774422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000846742,0.000129152,0.0202425,0.00029738733,0.000015144921,0.00072079396,0.13013667,0.00016589694,0.00027460576,0.04741265,0.80046004,0.000060513226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03926279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12298281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03926279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006451354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070674447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078068554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233657759","doi":"10.7202/1059314ar","title":"Administrative Delicts: A Case Study in Unlawful Municipal Administration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Business; Public administration; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05090888517934041,"score_gpt":0.3551519780356721,"score_spread":0.3042430928563317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233657759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640968,0.002543154,0.0025965413,0.0067076324,0.00010565833,0.00032285755,0.00012860501,0.00004422927,0.023454532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842184,0.0041304333,0.002039158,0.0010431407,0.00011564896,0.000119580465,0.000072422634,0.000036669677,0.008224431],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552935,0.0024734002,0.00022431172,0.00018760348,0.0005260729,0.00105928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407214,0.0028556085,0.0011824677,0.00028860872,0.0003828587,0.0012183546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030752835,0.0010483878,0.00064358715,0.0030310927,0.020092484,0.0042134207,0.0021122573,0.007161283,0.003555167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010623147,0.0008287142,0.0010812614,0.004931546,0.0063918754,0.0023629733,0.005083263,0.004863705,0.0006018744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016174826,0.0027365133,0.07275999,0.00049423415,0.000099439945,0.6847287,0.1437014,0.0027754884,0.0007771095,0.041973744,0.012982946,0.036808647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010699815,0.00084940327,0.06208817,0.00088728656,0.00015180871,0.26919705,0.53281444,0.0042471886,0.0012050922,0.013336435,0.1148895,0.00022665966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040252615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1282237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040252615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073896204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038009393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08003664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234575015","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2007.11424324","title":"Enforcement of Foreign Non-Monetary Judgments in Canada (And Beyond)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Choice of law; Payment; Common law; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Conflict of laws; Finance","score_opus":0.013112616779021393,"score_gpt":0.283167650151595,"score_spread":0.27005503337257364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234575015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23797017,0.0046456684,0.007219371,0.05689615,0.0006569759,0.00016033037,0.00047861427,0.00020366396,0.6917691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92159396,0.001307366,0.0027020571,0.010763549,0.00008901507,0.00003140991,0.00014022065,0.00003246819,0.06334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99269474,0.0004128704,0.00018092808,0.0007501084,0.002587811,0.0033735072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958496,0.0006634986,0.00026164425,0.00022649448,0.0022619972,0.0007368021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003585418,0.00043975047,0.00048422767,0.0012433728,0.023234539,0.008556717,0.0017692668,0.0037544097,0.0039710267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009448135,0.0005020313,0.000640483,0.0018260891,0.006294705,0.002031396,0.0028513572,0.0060890657,0.00028928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006231718,0.000051204723,0.008242788,0.000059227918,0.00003871636,0.0010317975,0.010074629,0.0015907872,0.0008250141,0.90342134,0.040087573,0.034514558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015069614,0.000145612,0.05869429,0.0006230796,0.00022940275,0.00079105806,0.014045514,0.007528346,0.0048257424,0.111269146,0.80112785,0.0005692058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09069075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09069075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1635444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6580105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234604469","doi":"","title":"A growing good faith in contracts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Good faith; Law; Faith; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02355135947674829,"score_gpt":0.2609068767667628,"score_spread":0.23735551729001447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234604469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0662739,0.010235861,0.018491423,0.45512053,0.0010055397,0.00007101918,0.000074424264,0.0000851184,0.4486422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9064416,0.0032557615,0.0049109976,0.059448525,0.0004549755,0.00004235012,0.00003672662,0.000047505433,0.025361454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738042,0.00798507,0.0007366216,0.0032520273,0.010689241,0.0035329743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95353955,0.029613372,0.0021026419,0.0041689184,0.005752356,0.0048231636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028091876,0.00018351527,0.0006268131,0.001203208,0.009644982,0.014474866,0.0017702584,0.009312696,0.0043072808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039186172,0.00053568324,0.00049160444,0.0016031798,0.052569535,0.011125565,0.009320521,0.017651986,0.000529032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004024143,0.000005297193,0.00019029476,0.000014246784,0.0000015501793,0.000053138017,0.0026517827,0.00005701807,0.0000909684,0.9848647,0.004908424,0.00715854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021744207,0.00003755443,0.0020607254,0.00039980334,0.000006909079,0.00024856464,0.005810288,0.0006973904,0.00036462914,0.7292424,0.2610561,0.00005396694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110089034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12788357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110089034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019357484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03737233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21889651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234768318","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139856478.015","title":"Cy-près as a class action remedy – justly maligned or just misunderstood?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Action (physics); Philosophy; Law; History; Epistemology; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.11305660805323185,"score_gpt":0.2958397335348814,"score_spread":0.18278312548164954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234768318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005359987,0.05458746,0.0068081934,0.6173663,0.018824993,0.00007502187,0.00008889462,0.00025533268,0.29663387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2919883,0.04602562,0.00816025,0.39866355,0.014767166,0.0002445627,0.00010876866,0.000469488,0.23957238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938088,0.002220406,0.00026751604,0.00075674616,0.0022391158,0.0007074251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618965,0.001419926,0.0002548796,0.00067682436,0.0010462088,0.00041248676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005277242,0.0004794631,0.0007299206,0.0011607253,0.0046310765,0.013580815,0.0028247582,0.012665646,0.00893765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01411514,0.00023105285,0.00037068297,0.0010990163,0.023598712,0.011114752,0.0033855028,0.015791304,0.0023048292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014385354,0.000018198287,0.00017995012,0.00014258447,0.0000074735276,0.00007922802,0.0022243499,0.00012197316,0.00015037217,0.8767487,0.0879406,0.032372195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010335101,0.000020571197,0.0003186584,0.00078962214,0.000012563138,0.00012675826,0.0023047097,0.00024581424,0.0003422561,0.1365458,0.85925645,0.000026492271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038482357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045992605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038482357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01064231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018971965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07721567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236579057","doi":"","title":"Causation in equitable compensation: The 'Brickenden' rule in Singapore: Then Khek Koon v Arjun Permanand Samtani [2014] 1 SLR 245","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Academy of Law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Causation; Casebook; Law; Compensation (psychology); Project commissioning; Honesty; Duty; Duty of care; Publishing; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.050697590457553725,"score_gpt":0.33770096256689214,"score_spread":0.2870033721093384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236579057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07528044,0.008104482,0.011237889,0.13494094,0.0012811271,0.00023008257,0.0003760857,0.00010122471,0.7684477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447363,0.0021030847,0.0024147686,0.06940328,0.00032707918,0.00023510699,0.00009006923,0.000051873663,0.080638506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314886,0.0019230981,0.0005668757,0.0011677998,0.0020630118,0.0011303516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983235,0.0006820864,0.0003211576,0.00022900716,0.0003318791,0.000112281654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064500915,0.0005493106,0.00069173827,0.00073658366,0.007407739,0.00794467,0.0018690082,0.012933196,0.005967362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008518449,0.0006698093,0.00087638246,0.0011537919,0.012936001,0.004940144,0.005218789,0.016448291,0.0012368878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010693802,0.000006621127,0.0005858628,0.000031913587,0.000008485722,0.0006871239,0.0027363226,0.00007979573,0.0001376202,0.9818153,0.011086976,0.0028132733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010204334,0.000113631046,0.006732764,0.0009783794,0.000086346336,0.0012778789,0.004902938,0.0012098138,0.002094955,0.5050689,0.47720554,0.00022681576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06536249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10749454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06536249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073959925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010059726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12996405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237135869","doi":"","title":"Mortgage Fraud, the Land Titles Act and Due Diligence: The Rabi v. Rosu Decision","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Appeal; Law; Real estate; Business; Legislative intent; Doctrine; Database transaction; Legislature; Law and economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.016241670940900427,"score_gpt":0.29439014937955943,"score_spread":0.278148478438659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237135869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12985362,0.01884091,0.0013858184,0.22620258,0.0008262064,0.00025877633,0.0004079341,0.00008233366,0.6221419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8142357,0.0058596567,0.0009594346,0.043519948,0.0005006321,0.00011156346,0.000096912205,0.000043968674,0.13467221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949056,0.0008489094,0.000207792,0.00045144567,0.0019751547,0.0016111413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967624,0.0014373135,0.00036860286,0.00017309513,0.0006690257,0.000589645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034920902,0.00031929335,0.00043405686,0.00083525025,0.010163262,0.008653458,0.0021001257,0.0153056,0.0037541508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070749917,0.00059408543,0.00056590885,0.0010382002,0.012107867,0.0029887538,0.002262104,0.0075664916,0.00066368753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003975699,0.000035867983,0.0045540486,0.00007333618,0.000015999094,0.0014215248,0.008547323,0.00031233786,0.0004718675,0.92124486,0.05215659,0.01112643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013546803,0.00009541306,0.027495269,0.00044920287,0.00012641551,0.00076777587,0.0097684525,0.0015190557,0.0013927938,0.058755606,0.8992563,0.00023832245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8708118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94570315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8708118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05427332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05341273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39378238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237432707","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Contracts: Should Courts Seek the Truth?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Action (physics); Law and economics; Verifiable secret sharing; Law; Political science; Economics; Business; Computer science; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.09076629143971328,"score_gpt":0.3673406532925412,"score_spread":0.2765743618528279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237432707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028529925,0.0153194,0.06299049,0.55679494,0.0017783288,0.00014229893,0.00015986881,0.00015261235,0.3341322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8883933,0.010096677,0.016560838,0.046105057,0.0023751394,0.00027469857,0.00009671894,0.00018302433,0.0359146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96609026,0.016569551,0.001758455,0.0031529358,0.008575286,0.0038535022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92887336,0.046446893,0.0048273387,0.007227366,0.010559002,0.002066069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038519576,0.0005767233,0.0014691316,0.0019716038,0.010077768,0.02701733,0.0038921894,0.028143454,0.009178547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11446621,0.0007712524,0.0009570427,0.0027699408,0.045889776,0.037274756,0.006859599,0.014577797,0.0021570718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007458275,0.0000074112727,0.00010920938,0.000027920229,0.0000037010186,0.000029572495,0.0009119635,0.0001511772,0.000030242247,0.99289036,0.0025020149,0.003328869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014738739,0.000009645091,0.00009466808,0.0001524023,0.0000061539313,0.000023427147,0.0010242818,0.00039271702,0.00009583527,0.978425,0.01975087,0.000010180079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01345787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009357587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038519576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010364282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01861609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20371342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240078556","doi":"","title":"Can I Change My Mind? Undoing Trustee Decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Rescission; Fiduciary; Regret; Law and economics; Vesting; Unjust enrichment; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Restitution; Psychology; Duty","score_opus":0.17565714290196013,"score_gpt":0.35670244940615725,"score_spread":0.18104530650419712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240078556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10718565,0.0056688823,0.07901084,0.34719324,0.0042121788,0.00019740626,0.00007577173,0.00038838343,0.45606762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90782195,0.0020686842,0.01000824,0.029874284,0.0015618062,0.00013319096,0.000029640174,0.00015208825,0.048350073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809686,0.008854852,0.00084761495,0.0017905664,0.0042587253,0.0032796212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97404295,0.014372799,0.0033238686,0.0037166127,0.0031036765,0.0014401056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021128945,0.00037457078,0.0004998408,0.0009969072,0.006689638,0.008633996,0.001679833,0.0076171756,0.009017271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10546169,0.00044313777,0.0006482722,0.0006468364,0.016421152,0.013747841,0.0064039063,0.010264527,0.0019033417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008607204,0.000067977126,0.0024486054,0.00006838592,0.0000410097,0.0014210384,0.028618967,0.00047267872,0.0007907059,0.8467915,0.050417013,0.06877612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006228589,0.000096152304,0.0015113873,0.00044256216,0.00006438961,0.0010892382,0.019370107,0.0017007907,0.002387964,0.638478,0.33467084,0.00012633919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053005875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054468564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021128945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003165094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059396755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11174184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240287932","doi":"","title":"What could have been?: the common law doctrine of Native Title in land under salt water in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand [Paper presented at the Conference of the Association for Canadian Studies in Australia and New Zealand (2004: Sydney).]","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Monash University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Doctrine; Project commissioning; Publishing; Salt water; Law; Political science; Salt lake; Sociology; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.08078244953061124,"score_gpt":0.3339157999329103,"score_spread":0.25313335040229906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240287932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4111425,0.0140792085,0.0036571706,0.25093,0.0011697885,0.00012216462,0.00040688916,0.000023723132,0.3184685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963906,0.0022083065,0.00066739286,0.010955074,0.0002846322,0.000039554918,0.000039970597,0.000009381838,0.021889675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975139,0.0007785848,0.00012337047,0.00034375532,0.00064776844,0.00059271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758947,0.0011489438,0.00032230932,0.00011869894,0.0005477263,0.0002728674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005001413,0.00014040244,0.00040136412,0.000707099,0.0062239403,0.0044575497,0.0011338335,0.005747679,0.0019844056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00892285,0.00021779221,0.0003847622,0.0007378226,0.019662283,0.0061002127,0.002607315,0.0032516704,0.00017307764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006236375,0.000024074412,0.007505032,0.00012278694,0.000018652774,0.00064584665,0.020282863,0.00023594848,0.0003768099,0.9463254,0.013396439,0.011003737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121096855,0.00017442637,0.102561794,0.0013557465,0.00014573174,0.00094919075,0.06503713,0.0019079867,0.0016981162,0.42591542,0.39990804,0.00022531414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3236542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47737098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3236542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084110405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01328953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6435406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240297430","doi":"","title":"De Quelques Invariables De La Possession: La Possession Transsystémique (Comparative Possession)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Humanities; Common law; Opposition (politics); Law; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03631969446359612,"score_gpt":0.3417786493921622,"score_spread":0.30545895492856606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240297430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16322345,0.012381724,0.019726308,0.011357109,0.0002152406,0.000024836361,0.000109687935,0.00004441385,0.79291725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98824745,0.0009775986,0.00053824723,0.00025771823,0.000058326164,0.000011349641,0.000019430368,0.000012794755,0.009877098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820745,0.00093104166,0.00005402228,0.00023667041,0.00027409827,0.00029682257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864405,0.000739932,0.00018787858,0.00014546307,0.00022945328,0.00005334274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015971238,0.00029606605,0.00028871984,0.0012104777,0.0050844587,0.005105025,0.00053752965,0.0017261575,0.008706465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021688154,0.00018896261,0.00031845918,0.0015423313,0.030845163,0.009141427,0.0030103792,0.0024219712,0.00039521596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010602335,0.000002567214,0.000338249,0.000037663216,0.0000036034153,0.00021447608,0.02951476,0.000038741142,0.00022393349,0.9646843,0.0006483136,0.004282916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026196722,0.00012411075,0.015328183,0.0005782912,0.000043364766,0.0025265757,0.10356782,0.0005924461,0.0013143565,0.45692563,0.4188948,0.00007819188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024610855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020811388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024610855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060437946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017467305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048935175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241306239","doi":"","title":"A Cross-jurisdictional Examination of Mergers and Amalgamations: Effects and Proposals for Reform","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Academy of Law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Project commissioning; Law reform; Publishing; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.02356982668972337,"score_gpt":0.3641988866493685,"score_spread":0.34062905995964515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241306239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6579559,0.008931743,0.011491796,0.032203432,0.00020199893,0.00024662202,0.000114645714,0.000093965646,0.28875998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935632,0.0009718373,0.0011987201,0.0012738993,0.00004740338,0.000039026698,0.00001297971,0.0000076149004,0.0028854283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98502177,0.008245491,0.0007283712,0.0011023727,0.0024134733,0.0024885007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695234,0.0202063,0.0042425273,0.002084691,0.0030784612,0.00086455274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010718924,0.00029290695,0.00063943083,0.003144121,0.005694416,0.009005169,0.0021554038,0.0045312354,0.009388403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032492783,0.000557385,0.0014007057,0.0049446463,0.01651235,0.012438069,0.006456567,0.003941522,0.00037760122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006643392,0.00015059882,0.0046289754,0.00010711011,0.000054560758,0.0003908461,0.0045206714,0.0013922451,0.0004895578,0.97268987,0.0008666847,0.014642367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002747149,0.0016839752,0.10176316,0.001535247,0.0006840507,0.0014508475,0.08298868,0.014860076,0.00688005,0.6292064,0.15834524,0.00032749763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025528574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036046296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025528574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010681657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07750124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241474305","doi":"","title":"Resolution of Mass Tort Claims in the Bankruptcy System","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Mass tort; Tort; Liability; Resolution (logic); Business; Law and economics; Law; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029035246333304104,"score_gpt":0.33791449210174285,"score_spread":0.3088792457684387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241474305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3732538,0.0059084273,0.3194483,0.014754801,0.00037574072,0.0005129168,0.00009181861,0.00046366907,0.28519052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631006,0.00086623256,0.026682397,0.0010198628,0.00022055935,0.00017671996,0.000023634291,0.000021273732,0.007888751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917691,0.0030883304,0.00056978327,0.0009491951,0.0023284042,0.0012952517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905393,0.0047687492,0.00202598,0.0013920492,0.00075240264,0.0005215776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01014707,0.00030274416,0.0010029968,0.0021471495,0.0031707697,0.0076745413,0.0014344547,0.004269927,0.0034130823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01628843,0.0005062951,0.000437259,0.0014548086,0.006630046,0.0045849867,0.007577115,0.0031571577,0.0007365766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007298756,0.00011301313,0.0028286148,0.00008467853,0.00003698329,0.00091895275,0.0024130077,0.008642013,0.0023296217,0.9184689,0.0050542504,0.059037056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018337893,0.0003716231,0.011029699,0.00057132036,0.00012773923,0.001560778,0.0025083758,0.040924475,0.0052202893,0.8546167,0.08275646,0.00012914531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001741977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019252452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01014707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026340631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044310465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053663433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243794389","doi":"","title":"The Law of Restitution in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008967143575353885,"score_gpt":0.20267207766325498,"score_spread":0.1937049340879011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243794389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011259168,0.009439497,0.0018070573,0.03481953,0.00053264166,0.00006974688,0.0003747412,0.00007913447,0.9416185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39263633,0.007108608,0.0014991803,0.013690941,0.0003120281,0.00014426147,0.00018025411,0.00015458014,0.5842739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515474,0.0004206093,0.0001286895,0.0004797148,0.0018481932,0.0019680567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784815,0.0005570052,0.00007718989,0.00015509602,0.0010158886,0.00034673148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001860357,0.0007259886,0.001027945,0.0019409279,0.022786953,0.016407102,0.0031567705,0.010177614,0.014798137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008089459,0.0009136386,0.00074919045,0.0048956675,0.019573987,0.0036375711,0.002878229,0.0105713075,0.0011640011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007716475,0.0000051409183,0.00013102735,0.000015050143,0.000004247234,0.000049572227,0.0010932409,0.00031925773,0.000021122012,0.96972984,0.025270086,0.0033537452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049100017,0.000013433993,0.0019890305,0.00029650802,0.000046652796,0.00009081278,0.0033055346,0.0016811929,0.00020899839,0.35162762,0.64057195,0.00011923109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99484223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16035323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16035323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20160003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97387123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244789019","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.018","title":"The contribution of fiduciary law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02166025923041811,"score_gpt":0.22995489938916383,"score_spread":0.20829464015874571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244789019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033865325,0.03296943,0.007456353,0.12611617,0.0020035342,0.000019478217,0.000045094614,0.00005312152,0.79747146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93571466,0.009705125,0.0016942736,0.015627699,0.0026408373,0.000033406974,0.000029788587,0.000037271013,0.03451695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304634,0.0026145163,0.00014275053,0.0009508695,0.001823072,0.0014224452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913167,0.00437332,0.00055336923,0.001319847,0.0015164857,0.0009202214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066822083,0.00034143432,0.00044502792,0.002118786,0.006888587,0.008401513,0.0013554165,0.0045608585,0.0051716454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015130955,0.00029098862,0.00045627417,0.0012015565,0.024329454,0.008262759,0.0052256775,0.0069633373,0.00089053466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002658673,0.0000055935866,0.0003279969,0.000011363741,0.0000020598527,0.000024028766,0.0006750677,0.00005654712,0.000009871859,0.98937607,0.0042962288,0.005212501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009520074,0.000017124616,0.0009993551,0.00023485719,0.000011331283,0.0001213718,0.0011988607,0.0005742659,0.00008338413,0.7077139,0.28901955,0.000016427579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023119021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014333169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023119021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012262129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008225016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088968456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245621942","doi":"","title":"Some Australian Reflections on Roncarelli","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Principle of legality; Statutory law; Political science; Common law; Statute; High Court; Damages; Misconduct; Liability","score_opus":0.032950925669973194,"score_gpt":0.36863282461743657,"score_spread":0.33568189894746336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245621942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011348238,0.023410458,0.00043120992,0.79269505,0.004165024,0.000034032146,0.00005582488,0.000039152874,0.167821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18799327,0.02259931,0.0009988332,0.5838511,0.006514696,0.00008264362,0.000034704506,0.00009861684,0.19782686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930206,0.0020824648,0.00033245288,0.0010263266,0.0021338647,0.0014043599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495655,0.0026118548,0.00042231218,0.00021841173,0.0010793936,0.00071137154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007610125,0.00048638703,0.0006158723,0.0020796251,0.015139485,0.008214155,0.0026375856,0.015667569,0.010619815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015288497,0.0006027214,0.0009217576,0.0027281307,0.014330771,0.006833055,0.0054439153,0.022247514,0.0013688698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047182268,0.00008394881,0.0011507927,0.00030720176,0.000011589936,0.0019380479,0.03590067,0.00013236684,0.0006116525,0.562959,0.36308354,0.03377404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008531346,0.00004620503,0.0032899037,0.00047775806,0.000010452196,0.0003493746,0.006551349,0.00011578351,0.00018975542,0.022443738,0.9664661,0.000050980638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32258558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3612828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32258558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02309462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016476657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64141583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245724478","doi":"","title":"A 'PPSA' registration primer","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Statute; Business; Property (philosophy); Security interest; State (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Finance; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08669454872963996,"score_gpt":0.387659541656537,"score_spread":0.30096499292689705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245724478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001817917,0.005967688,0.06844957,0.10795207,0.015992556,0.0010065481,0.0020748794,0.0013075309,0.7954312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031010553,0.013878415,0.062909104,0.07316963,0.006889788,0.0018630737,0.003247861,0.0012860487,0.80574536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886813,0.0039757537,0.001029479,0.0008902476,0.004621613,0.0008015404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99022794,0.004736963,0.0005510925,0.0008637665,0.0030691905,0.0005510888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013872876,0.00064079685,0.00060990924,0.0033325488,0.005808835,0.01031265,0.0024908953,0.0069791065,0.050332434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017037522,0.0011654255,0.0010137289,0.0045797103,0.005271811,0.0119636115,0.005041246,0.0131252855,0.04290205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008417605,0.00003442668,0.00013926234,0.00010656282,0.000001889088,0.0001156198,0.001192621,0.00018642098,0.00021671042,0.65532047,0.31396982,0.028707765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016752399,0.0000080611535,0.000103857135,0.00009267546,8.2756577e-7,0.00007649785,0.00018578228,0.00008903762,0.000070205606,0.011369653,0.98799604,0.000005723851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016561579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015365406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050332434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056391056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015349241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16837877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245760019","doi":"","title":"Comparative Analysis of Canadian Law, Aboriginal Law and Civil Law Traditions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Project commissioning; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Common law; Sociology; Public law; Social science","score_opus":0.05499892801041512,"score_gpt":0.37051561079033435,"score_spread":0.31551668277991923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245760019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3879084,0.09082219,0.0005570801,0.0179446,0.0003213511,0.0001814936,0.002091242,0.000038393646,0.5001353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9245533,0.048077308,0.00089303724,0.0014171831,0.000077422475,0.000073990705,0.0008979828,0.000018768696,0.023991143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947365,0.00052756665,0.0001379517,0.00025248382,0.0031171709,0.0012283454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879111,0.0023986315,0.00068122824,0.00015634309,0.008082834,0.0007699933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003462397,0.00017849497,0.00042252778,0.015454865,0.010816281,0.0047999388,0.0012848912,0.00076085766,0.0067400527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014965941,0.00018875588,0.0002822288,0.032796092,0.003560832,0.0012639518,0.0016992901,0.00082005083,0.00018429768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014866942,0.000087592794,0.07500712,0.003251261,0.0002278332,0.0014264251,0.10463426,0.0012563032,0.00090818387,0.43601102,0.084071204,0.29297018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016110296,0.00006099342,0.5706474,0.0014220787,0.00019028544,0.0002741438,0.07174381,0.00045317409,0.00025962433,0.0056953663,0.34917435,0.000062742896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11165338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11165338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16505712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8101058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245788390","doi":"","title":"The Future for Business Trusts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Statutory law; Business; Corporate law; Accountability; Legislature; Law and economics; Law; Corporate governance; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.018975518554385926,"score_gpt":0.28481079653616553,"score_spread":0.2658352779817796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245788390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017773854,0.023512214,0.012964955,0.54231954,0.0027022895,0.00004272657,0.00009810467,0.00013977008,0.4004466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85371816,0.014533316,0.0046441215,0.027103957,0.0018442849,0.000089841924,0.00010546203,0.000086606124,0.097874284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898475,0.004690643,0.00034463967,0.0008191232,0.0019678003,0.0023303346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805832,0.0053009135,0.0017661211,0.002029562,0.005095418,0.005224706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009117652,0.0002843799,0.00037959893,0.0011429285,0.009123146,0.018175246,0.0011462484,0.008568245,0.01064923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022944069,0.00033226356,0.00059664773,0.0015009807,0.018544229,0.020209208,0.0057075983,0.0074895043,0.002361345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036689044,0.000003988765,0.0001287019,0.000014557177,0.000001858229,0.000032184158,0.00056551176,0.000063746025,0.000011894009,0.98070127,0.013560845,0.0049118623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010620014,0.00001594452,0.00036030906,0.00018985434,0.0000063410585,0.00012532693,0.0022935076,0.00038928192,0.00006026864,0.52888274,0.4676483,0.0000174913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028793992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024741884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028793992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01945577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025034001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14116216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246285831","doi":"10.2307/825992","title":"Taking Law Seriously","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; sort; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.014648262376545214,"score_gpt":0.2551295873113233,"score_spread":0.24048132493477808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246285831","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004758609,0.1482135,0.015533143,0.5535968,0.012256467,0.000053519267,0.00011852227,0.00014695968,0.26532245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42808944,0.14090547,0.016538218,0.27468976,0.031629257,0.0001814175,0.0002111564,0.000234133,0.10752109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943916,0.0023420842,0.00021988148,0.00057616393,0.0020239719,0.0004463337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940129,0.0031782647,0.00031796697,0.00052909227,0.0014025146,0.00055928365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069143637,0.00058484694,0.0010367375,0.001667495,0.006397046,0.012133234,0.0013964536,0.008200206,0.004063276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011228541,0.00036096582,0.00054989284,0.0015452852,0.022494076,0.013264859,0.0030625532,0.008614078,0.0015899622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005363539,0.000010427152,0.00022628046,0.0001876525,0.000012785414,0.00008963194,0.0028225698,0.0002073763,0.00011857893,0.9131406,0.060723104,0.022455707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004413162,0.00001668467,0.0003080624,0.0004628595,0.000012394442,0.00009659409,0.002447742,0.0001718329,0.00010008883,0.43150494,0.56486386,0.000010510111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019653851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026404826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019653851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007966131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00962463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057798624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246802114","doi":"","title":"Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Labrador Liquor Wholesale Pty Ltd","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Officer; Chief executive officer; Law; Business; Excise; High Court; Management; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.01224027266324897,"score_gpt":0.2714355783200659,"score_spread":0.2591953056568169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246802114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01742633,0.0032967385,0.00075789203,0.08283333,0.0049111256,0.00024084067,0.0012383692,0.0004169199,0.8888785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035533704,0.00073310774,0.00014526257,0.017741019,0.00055244146,0.00003979147,0.00017974248,0.00006828081,0.9450066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974141,0.00016337217,0.00011769647,0.0002623514,0.0010947426,0.0009476457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805754,0.00040771894,0.00017688383,0.00008294348,0.0008474932,0.00042741865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012843033,0.0004503669,0.00040285796,0.0010721679,0.0053242375,0.003687972,0.000984239,0.005507697,0.10913097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042117466,0.00074343395,0.00038886952,0.00095372123,0.00085584156,0.0014195985,0.001274875,0.00544627,0.02852019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007603466,0.00003564407,0.0017437701,0.00009520471,0.000009416506,0.0017732029,0.0004360835,0.00008812288,0.0008586044,0.038510855,0.93310255,0.023270512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027636115,0.00007774949,0.0062869014,0.00010621482,0.00001556625,0.0006199697,0.00043614156,0.0002262142,0.0009148422,0.0025131865,0.9887348,0.00004085717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09265568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18258755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10913097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051961076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010346847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36507952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248313797","doi":"","title":"Compensation and Punishment in Tort Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Culpability; Law; Political science; Sanctions; Harm; Punitive damages; Law and economics; Punishment (psychology); Enforcement; Private law; Temptation; Public law; Sociology; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.010712854563306904,"score_gpt":0.275816692253757,"score_spread":0.2651038376904501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248313797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026821913,0.09102012,0.034726094,0.07624256,0.0021975914,0.0001385864,0.00011335508,0.000102041224,0.7686378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86326975,0.027522322,0.005654656,0.009304751,0.0041206917,0.00020999918,0.0000781017,0.000050346913,0.0897893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99236286,0.0037898154,0.0003579328,0.00071810425,0.0016208191,0.0011504053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627703,0.0021306905,0.0005399842,0.00029784575,0.0005213719,0.00023301278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005750928,0.0008260911,0.00084123196,0.0020282085,0.0050609494,0.007845612,0.001119076,0.009265566,0.007894386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009850494,0.0003768523,0.00064422784,0.0019805403,0.021203939,0.0063147293,0.0029409959,0.005092585,0.0011218858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004090967,0.000008558845,0.0001348892,0.000024620076,0.0000019694075,0.0000347904,0.00021517891,0.0005117932,0.000015285712,0.9943433,0.0018657034,0.002839808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020497697,0.000035031804,0.00068313174,0.0002541811,0.0000061434353,0.00010945598,0.00035016562,0.0013561704,0.000051936804,0.93689936,0.06021463,0.000019272282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077777463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004503157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009265566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081754085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055613006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059316993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249147043","doi":"","title":"Writing About the Death Penalty","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Capital punishment; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Classics; Criminology; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.02565109008565519,"score_gpt":0.30217404620473515,"score_spread":0.27652295611907995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249147043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004487633,0.056257397,0.0038190414,0.6627544,0.07360188,0.00002221378,0.00028803,0.00007280181,0.1986966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2339843,0.04942642,0.003322763,0.297699,0.08686665,0.00013381038,0.00034119366,0.00031404357,0.32791182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729675,0.0013207076,0.00015618585,0.00036266778,0.0006444852,0.00021911762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908688,0.006216213,0.00045898644,0.00043042522,0.0016262522,0.00039923246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038250976,0.00049291924,0.00036139687,0.0012794738,0.0060156723,0.00477687,0.0006694899,0.0044963155,0.008836406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024359774,0.00020831348,0.00024259016,0.0008776263,0.006904038,0.0060323584,0.0018536107,0.010342219,0.0022829757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018664592,0.000008834667,0.00018360185,0.00006431051,0.0000043724262,0.00008878338,0.0029419824,0.0001105918,0.000060920083,0.26296946,0.7022903,0.03125819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004632138,0.000013369756,0.00037606226,0.00037149177,0.0000029973232,0.00007106629,0.0015196463,0.000057819925,0.000099368146,0.04187967,0.9555943,0.000009607501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006305485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010443741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008836406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024042055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027302904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029560745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252457141","doi":"","title":"The taxation element in awards of damages for personal injuries and death.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Element (criminal law); Personal injury; Forensic engineering; Law; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.02500399751210295,"score_gpt":0.27198813157449375,"score_spread":0.2469841340623908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252457141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22267132,0.009377061,0.00271502,0.01740843,0.0005438425,0.00031851936,0.0015668955,0.000052785548,0.7453462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305807,0.0019154259,0.0011058514,0.0013532863,0.00007018872,0.00007314345,0.00035545058,0.000022952787,0.06452293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846384,0.0040184907,0.0010043003,0.0004383561,0.008153854,0.0017466317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98762053,0.003885574,0.002117722,0.0007464337,0.0048567867,0.000773046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077578165,0.00026525636,0.00036744063,0.0028703026,0.0025990708,0.00350911,0.001149473,0.0016077596,0.0074969726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039812654,0.0003365234,0.00054392574,0.0031856862,0.0025987283,0.0019883893,0.0024871875,0.0019124454,0.0010764387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005069205,0.0002287487,0.105668955,0.00042823228,0.00016383221,0.001172932,0.010341695,0.0038489965,0.00062844466,0.63600034,0.05799896,0.18301189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086907065,0.00028446096,0.60231453,0.0011898006,0.00025934327,0.002226538,0.008850414,0.0036017701,0.0017566311,0.055385802,0.3238975,0.00014633554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24365045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39717156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24365045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009991133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015449764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48446447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252460478","doi":"","title":"Strate v. A-1 Contractors: Intrusion into the Sovereign Domain of Native Nations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Sovereignty; Jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Sovereign immunity; Supreme Court Decisions; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.014211964238102538,"score_gpt":0.2874388920489146,"score_spread":0.27322692781081204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252460478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29779023,0.004410176,0.0053410414,0.098902084,0.00078342395,0.00008512519,0.00011429955,0.000036129208,0.59253746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96590394,0.0006329832,0.0010030079,0.014407477,0.00013775473,0.000037329148,0.000017325183,0.000008730636,0.017851634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997184,0.00087561196,0.000091421854,0.0003119341,0.0006532289,0.0008838465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981,0.0012879722,0.00012972539,0.00012244005,0.0002023313,0.00015758374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00346491,0.00018247376,0.0003057757,0.0007444449,0.006968477,0.0060714274,0.0006296458,0.00593155,0.0017310863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063828207,0.00026397422,0.00036790612,0.0007242845,0.015757715,0.0029187682,0.0030328438,0.0076322793,0.00017188184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040972723,0.0000026237076,0.00027220882,0.000003481491,0.0000013788401,0.00015112708,0.002709244,0.000039164122,0.0000745725,0.9930468,0.002443081,0.0012521929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064357846,0.00007614797,0.0043932167,0.00024728358,0.000036053585,0.0007474114,0.011522698,0.0012571098,0.0018231253,0.73256016,0.24717097,0.000101404774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05416086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083759986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05416086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005251266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008654007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10769123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252949048","doi":"","title":"Rights and Remedies: A Complex Relationship","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Plaintiff; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Common law; Human rights; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.04314057453781277,"score_gpt":0.3305134882964798,"score_spread":0.287372913758667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252949048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10341172,0.013398224,0.19270568,0.19213188,0.0006288358,0.00030766183,0.00027903382,0.00022469931,0.49691224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96344846,0.00304403,0.016931595,0.004963064,0.00041090997,0.00017683653,0.000042397,0.000058026475,0.010924611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765005,0.012068542,0.0011531829,0.0029613925,0.005986221,0.0013301984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95659596,0.032290205,0.00400232,0.0031593894,0.0026576756,0.0012944759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013416402,0.0004668376,0.0009440167,0.00345991,0.0037589262,0.011923698,0.0018223277,0.006342217,0.012350465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037794255,0.00068563735,0.0008863592,0.0023036343,0.050627522,0.02953613,0.009134131,0.007874534,0.00082217396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032997527,0.0000111638665,0.00023316199,0.000018609666,0.000006362642,0.00003207713,0.00045757846,0.00018527261,0.00004646309,0.99594575,0.00031242924,0.0027478621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122609545,0.000009838715,0.0006154102,0.00006588299,0.000008229293,0.000054450982,0.00043608458,0.00033272442,0.000075236996,0.98715615,0.011219811,0.0000138282085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028382433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018400458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013416402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054072873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041352147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07095355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253338422","doi":"","title":"Dolphin Delivery: The Constitutional Values Standard and its Implications for Private Law in Quebec","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Law; Common law; Political science; Enforcement; Private law; Diversity (politics); Public law","score_opus":0.05484862808334706,"score_gpt":0.3356468472450946,"score_spread":0.2807982191617475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253338422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37407202,0.008552446,0.010320613,0.13042893,0.0006811403,0.00047404846,0.0024034425,0.00022414632,0.47284326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93313223,0.0015177685,0.0046724216,0.008116134,0.00008923509,0.00012321056,0.0002767372,0.000036820995,0.052035406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903584,0.001784367,0.0003123044,0.0010622612,0.0036872288,0.0027954646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838082,0.0057586157,0.0009192063,0.00090186973,0.0072156177,0.0013965027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008281974,0.00026885196,0.00043897252,0.0018885568,0.014861332,0.012635473,0.0028531838,0.003983269,0.0052184765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016745348,0.00047060408,0.00051000726,0.0028655438,0.010598739,0.0027555148,0.0021540031,0.0035246173,0.00020013994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008740645,0.00008851997,0.016938776,0.00012685487,0.00003315013,0.0007157488,0.0076229414,0.0031979438,0.0009845538,0.907399,0.031150386,0.031654734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002353306,0.00029336204,0.24721403,0.0012996297,0.0002022771,0.00048717848,0.030377321,0.019184813,0.0033591073,0.1393437,0.5572917,0.0007115802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16670322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16670322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1822738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9665061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253747404","doi":"10.5040/9781472565198.ch-007","title":"A Common Law Prescription for a Medical Malaise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malaise; Medical prescription; Law; Medicine; Political science; Internal medicine; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.042835555366917785,"score_gpt":0.30187336570386375,"score_spread":0.25903781033694595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253747404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0079515,0.01053195,0.049847893,0.48807776,0.006362911,0.00016084775,0.00018859784,0.00027426198,0.43660432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57384205,0.005942355,0.035702284,0.2083707,0.008085094,0.0005422226,0.00014587851,0.00034018618,0.16702914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810234,0.0071996646,0.0011018695,0.004589913,0.0047722105,0.0013129769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855678,0.00804911,0.0009688421,0.0022998205,0.002275096,0.00083936384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017985806,0.0007439864,0.0009472589,0.0022666804,0.008970164,0.010165343,0.0020900317,0.016666424,0.008026028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030526273,0.0006226544,0.0010264937,0.0012888783,0.08590523,0.013760125,0.0072481357,0.024506597,0.0026984224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002669521,0.0000026013704,0.00002931497,0.000008298766,0.0000011912997,0.00001601056,0.00039252316,0.000028729166,0.000024057148,0.9946567,0.003779383,0.0010585635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029089879,0.000025020212,0.00021585675,0.0001942999,0.0000068559957,0.00012819422,0.0005244286,0.0003532668,0.00016682297,0.7410637,0.2572632,0.000029215014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018075675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015365514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018075675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012213803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012905441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09511918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254170277","doi":"","title":"The Bank's Fiduciary Duty: An Israeli-Canadian Comparison","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.01186058638554037,"score_gpt":0.29704782186293044,"score_spread":0.28518723547739006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254170277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17572826,0.008030084,0.00044125633,0.013783635,0.00019384391,0.000063941596,0.00091994664,0.00002376397,0.80081517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95785415,0.0067658215,0.00048310505,0.0020398167,0.00004832758,0.000025027992,0.00035986846,0.000024547884,0.032399334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579203,0.00025697768,0.00009379155,0.00022614017,0.002118602,0.001512511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946256,0.0005046132,0.00033095645,0.00010297294,0.0037047463,0.00073111255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017284432,0.0003627028,0.000518039,0.0050704926,0.015464012,0.006489579,0.0015491166,0.0015616094,0.009925274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067716115,0.00020805483,0.00041670536,0.010200708,0.0036910167,0.0013764395,0.0019133468,0.0022294312,0.00051794644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038261624,0.00014894242,0.047102444,0.00030458387,0.00009930137,0.00084087846,0.019388417,0.0010056642,0.0005658046,0.7839334,0.065714784,0.08051315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000131507,0.0000962034,0.24121004,0.0008575873,0.00023048172,0.0010387828,0.05417042,0.0023239555,0.0010867373,0.020453911,0.6781084,0.00029186317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99154186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99533194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11400951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11400951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059535194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8272008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254551673","doi":"10.29173/alr1384","title":"A Choice among Values: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives on the Defence of Necessity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03708634020627528,"score_gpt":0.3025293478092375,"score_spread":0.26544300760296224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254551673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019857375,0.0512062,0.029540747,0.1441994,0.00082417,0.000042100284,0.00006699327,0.00003519728,0.75422776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94284403,0.01883302,0.0062553138,0.006507869,0.00064972334,0.00008443614,0.00003700718,0.000052136653,0.024736345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916311,0.004884841,0.00016150036,0.00058290665,0.0016172206,0.0011223943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908545,0.0064780754,0.0005486557,0.00032863618,0.0011830406,0.0006070856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009880414,0.0007482144,0.0007650724,0.0047470424,0.010875801,0.015785273,0.0028794224,0.0070824656,0.0036104186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008166362,0.00045438542,0.00052053464,0.00676545,0.116784774,0.010945714,0.0043129735,0.007507848,0.0004396983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4191477e-7,0.0000010472542,0.000016462875,0.00000601065,4.6329487e-7,0.000011086856,0.0012491517,0.00003006569,0.000004167145,0.9976641,0.00041208015,0.00060468976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043639657,0.0000062810786,0.00017279212,0.00018866631,0.000003127444,0.000048336515,0.0049824347,0.00019376545,0.00003297122,0.92839193,0.065964624,0.000010615754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1290998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14045323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1290998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0414174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019673536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3005057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254894082","doi":"","title":"Contract Theory: 'Introduction to General Theories' and 'The Justification of Contractual Obligations'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Obligation; Contract theory; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006448288431329427,"score_gpt":0.27587391130258176,"score_spread":0.2694256228712523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254894082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027938853,0.1562329,0.08660697,0.06748081,0.012611537,0.00033222826,0.0013390265,0.00048359807,0.6721191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.091642454,0.26634142,0.08709541,0.034287926,0.022636818,0.001722998,0.0038355247,0.0010280537,0.49140933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967823,0.0009088255,0.00018020273,0.00036727122,0.0014455931,0.00031567624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654883,0.0023613626,0.00019832689,0.00021476792,0.000527484,0.00014936943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026461128,0.0013080456,0.0011889192,0.0027104265,0.0023054816,0.0064615393,0.0025466841,0.0047014635,0.04257462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005399761,0.00087823824,0.0013858277,0.0049668835,0.008913962,0.009315244,0.002534266,0.010437553,0.012391298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007002635,0.000030908184,0.000119770106,0.00026668684,0.000009097213,0.00007030656,0.001040124,0.0004407145,0.000098342134,0.8160902,0.15045364,0.031373125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005241906,0.000016221124,0.00022710867,0.0005062256,0.000004249861,0.0001768775,0.0003308631,0.0003650458,0.00004343669,0.3092942,0.68901634,0.000014243923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048861313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032114217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04257462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051866267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005594767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14242625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255112517","doi":"","title":"The Telezone Litigation: Artful Pleading and the Dismemberment of Federal Administrative Law or Access to Meaningful Relief","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Pleading; Jurisdiction; Appeal; Principle of legality; Civil procedure; Damages","score_opus":0.026224323520852386,"score_gpt":0.3544496665854709,"score_spread":0.3282253430646185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255112517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13678157,0.002553565,0.006353947,0.06848831,0.0008155739,0.00009225421,0.00006737584,0.00009440485,0.784753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94919235,0.0009882267,0.00091889565,0.012520773,0.0005292543,0.00004326638,0.00002459866,0.000023653953,0.03575906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934906,0.0014226567,0.0002765539,0.0009931276,0.0019864312,0.0018306654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915337,0.0058555044,0.0008535973,0.000989857,0.00040940777,0.00035786125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005198028,0.00037269897,0.00044061255,0.0013675088,0.0074022436,0.010597268,0.0019077212,0.017464096,0.01492681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019368311,0.00045396722,0.00070330896,0.0011587009,0.021161677,0.011056837,0.0047326074,0.012485137,0.00095350033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074709205,0.00004607259,0.0009112439,0.000026698484,0.000006118811,0.00053642935,0.0018017604,0.00026000314,0.00042040081,0.9786357,0.008119637,0.009161249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000297355,0.00029928703,0.0122759165,0.0007569366,0.0001576873,0.0019575837,0.012437346,0.0054235216,0.0040057776,0.7366654,0.22555985,0.00016329238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03116725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07239382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03116725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00973205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074591185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0706113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255320997","doi":"","title":"Contribution à une étude des troubles de voisinage et de la nuisance : la notion de devoirs de la propriété (Contribution to a Study of Neighbourhood Disturbances and Excessive Annoyances: The Notion of Duties Incumbent Upon Ownership)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Obligation; Supreme court; Law; Dimension (graph theory); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Welfare economics; Economics; Public law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015834592936013605,"score_gpt":0.3056801416061689,"score_spread":0.28984554867015533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255320997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29899392,0.033030204,0.12817168,0.08178429,0.0010794637,0.00007677478,0.00009180916,0.00006235142,0.4567095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97957486,0.0031382283,0.0050871163,0.0012204555,0.00036308632,0.000033507647,0.000012412015,0.000025934172,0.0105444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632937,0.0017936055,0.00012386622,0.00038722393,0.0010576562,0.0003082843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949196,0.0028980742,0.0008505169,0.0004617645,0.0004913843,0.00037868423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025657876,0.00029465047,0.000415469,0.00094733614,0.003471103,0.0066964473,0.0012196486,0.0033475952,0.0024585556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005395992,0.00030491664,0.00055334903,0.0010256823,0.038007814,0.010297512,0.005837439,0.004378078,0.00023150425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008723845,0.00002368851,0.001416232,0.000059900525,0.000005958577,0.00023990235,0.017522521,0.00031435987,0.00019806076,0.9706614,0.0015558582,0.007993428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011978591,0.000047654023,0.005766707,0.0002581159,0.000016562695,0.0015942391,0.018059395,0.0015949523,0.00044010123,0.8204109,0.15175413,0.000045309327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039791656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054247123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066964473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029182478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020523358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021173418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255921133","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2015.20511","title":"Comparative overview on the transformative effect of acquisitive prescription and adverse possession : morality, legitimacy, justice","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Legitimacy; Medical prescription; Possession (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine; History; Pharmacology; Land tenure","score_opus":0.10552151013526145,"score_gpt":0.3757852775835352,"score_spread":0.27026376744827374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255921133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00990925,0.4287612,0.005146565,0.028132137,0.0010042982,0.000049520557,0.00012245112,0.00002885802,0.5268457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39028797,0.5417716,0.003946286,0.00847043,0.005352203,0.0001921203,0.0002475272,0.00010218807,0.049629603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966647,0.0017184997,0.00019379379,0.00024072187,0.00080640224,0.00037594698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99124604,0.007366641,0.0004490796,0.00022474612,0.0005667889,0.0001467086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028063501,0.00048792452,0.0008307379,0.005112667,0.002706179,0.0074072615,0.00091668486,0.0036879529,0.0099357525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057915314,0.00036447836,0.0007835344,0.0070684925,0.011900514,0.007979852,0.0021817228,0.003999769,0.00096400606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026982507,0.000024354958,0.00040371835,0.00068022625,0.000016078544,0.00011689466,0.0031427888,0.00029090932,0.00012171837,0.96220905,0.0075551877,0.0254121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015870093,0.00010216465,0.0075940397,0.0028257165,0.000049562062,0.0005589778,0.0047241473,0.000745342,0.00040460774,0.33110893,0.6518261,0.000044520923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010798917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010515841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010798917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008904926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004400261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064610004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256102448","doi":"","title":"The Political Path to Limited Liability in Business Trusts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Limited liability; Appeal; Liability; Statutory law; Legislature; Business; Politics; Law and economics; Limited liability partnership; Variety (cybernetics); Strict liability; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.008512584094819073,"score_gpt":0.2842754211853111,"score_spread":0.275762837090492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256102448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24199006,0.001406136,0.0458805,0.09740775,0.00025369233,0.00014444864,0.000064607346,0.00006839089,0.6127844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98435956,0.00017904227,0.0012994107,0.0028898674,0.00009824453,0.00005832598,0.000008601318,0.000014250861,0.011092747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903757,0.0036401474,0.0003283928,0.0012400574,0.0022543939,0.0021612272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881406,0.006265044,0.001496789,0.0010376254,0.0016670594,0.0013928815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007921747,0.00017782362,0.00033921204,0.0011685165,0.0106717,0.0094442535,0.0009491542,0.006782029,0.005049883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023737503,0.0006174075,0.0005131339,0.0007689082,0.032860924,0.005565851,0.0070440336,0.009146979,0.0006164869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043741525,0.0000093101025,0.0003478004,0.0000049676237,0.0000024119233,0.000063115964,0.0010231113,0.00012617903,0.00007536766,0.9965359,0.00066667056,0.0011409044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042719472,0.000041972744,0.0016813285,0.00007552364,0.000012491676,0.00018772742,0.0011412809,0.0013439709,0.0004838916,0.9495717,0.045389734,0.000027603974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016681269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013807976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016681269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101686595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084471805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073779106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256424075","doi":"","title":"Damages for Breach of Contracts with Alternative Performances","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Breach of contract; Discretion; Salary; Reputation; Law; Business; Position (finance); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.021296013449943422,"score_gpt":0.299655240809771,"score_spread":0.2783592273598276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256424075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08588534,0.0028060763,0.043483727,0.013051614,0.0012511703,0.0007432526,0.0009085338,0.00041850883,0.85145175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8484887,0.0013226006,0.015801057,0.0034555064,0.0006855835,0.0006625303,0.0006292648,0.0001408052,0.128814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9121503,0.008755814,0.005770998,0.00611139,0.057946768,0.009264685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713876,0.0056715673,0.0030511746,0.007545517,0.010217271,0.0021269128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018364936,0.0016330121,0.0014618963,0.005654857,0.0067893183,0.0149300285,0.0057810983,0.015081488,0.01774155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05647575,0.0010198696,0.0027437715,0.0026541941,0.012628224,0.0075247167,0.011355791,0.010145523,0.004699951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022142127,0.00013234573,0.004785622,0.00019223256,0.00014770402,0.0013433082,0.001681191,0.0042532897,0.0016519263,0.9260889,0.016148834,0.043353125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016848081,0.00095842837,0.034147754,0.0021323466,0.0003851922,0.006480183,0.0036287198,0.017386923,0.0030145836,0.5463704,0.38458824,0.00073881744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028659519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027810937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028659519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014218134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0146217905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10316026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256453476","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.017","title":"Why civil law countries might forego the individual trustee: provocative insights from the new-to-the-fold","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fold (higher-order function); Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Economics; Engineering; Public law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.031844905879955226,"score_gpt":0.2228973133682259,"score_spread":0.19105240748827068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256453476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028077161,0.012843755,0.01280706,0.16494223,0.0015304234,0.000026793736,0.000034217817,0.000044711902,0.77969366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86863786,0.006536088,0.0046460098,0.031917505,0.0016389999,0.00008698272,0.000037555543,0.00012341898,0.08637553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961205,0.0023045987,0.00008596344,0.00038108486,0.00049631053,0.0006114384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681747,0.0021563226,0.00016484906,0.0003637943,0.00028410737,0.00021342437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005250484,0.0003095501,0.00045431373,0.0006657255,0.007591174,0.011950705,0.0011757016,0.0072939475,0.0040322673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064888317,0.00029526182,0.00039240072,0.0012983221,0.035637278,0.016866645,0.0041349125,0.008779125,0.000861556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012020364,0.0000027238166,0.000031392545,0.0000033176693,3.1333494e-7,0.00002793807,0.0016705416,0.000020704116,0.0000072307994,0.9945306,0.0029086552,0.000795297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071847035,0.000008138681,0.00022516142,0.00009585444,0.0000026373411,0.0001286273,0.0047281953,0.00034304932,0.00008698389,0.83807635,0.15628771,0.000010149734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059554037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010696275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011950705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005789233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034674497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04200405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256763530","doi":"10.1017/cls.2015.28","title":"Testamentary Archeology in Late-Victorian Ontario: William Martin's Little, Posthumous Legal System","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Bequest; Estate; Executor; Context (archaeology); Ideology; Law; Probate; State (computer science); Settlor; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; History; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.019603312483894575,"score_gpt":0.26090479897381835,"score_spread":0.24130148648992378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256763530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1463925,0.0064746984,0.0018201009,0.034092642,0.0003699562,0.0000752338,0.00045098847,0.00009484088,0.81022906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79548365,0.001679727,0.00073998445,0.0012156257,0.000040153216,0.000033191754,0.0000547216,0.000051514697,0.20070148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992448,0.00014167566,0.000018450914,0.000081723985,0.0002110792,0.00030232413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892837,0.00022441187,0.00010071874,0.00006637488,0.00036805877,0.00031201402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083308545,0.00019283862,0.00022054283,0.0012119631,0.020672703,0.0046934644,0.00095228694,0.0014988662,0.00736486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021470422,0.00023197179,0.000115362694,0.0021243151,0.023179185,0.0011554196,0.0020104235,0.0017542845,0.00048570277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003237159,0.000012157999,0.0025627017,0.0000522812,0.0000045757497,0.00052798924,0.10499349,0.0002703078,0.00037111822,0.8418394,0.03631708,0.013016565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092769615,0.0000122054935,0.013202033,0.0001777208,0.000009694841,0.00016834517,0.036131166,0.00028392038,0.00020317151,0.028522648,0.92123973,0.000040011342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114360526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114360526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0527608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82974756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256869429","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004215","title":"Property, Corrective Justice, and the Nature of the Cause of Action in Unjust Enrichment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Restitution; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.026146688250142158,"score_gpt":0.3315620764756276,"score_spread":0.3054153882254854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256869429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093112156,0.0041768984,0.22275624,0.044323556,0.00052131154,0.00018351765,0.000081246886,0.00019338811,0.6346516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98122233,0.00046558338,0.009266108,0.0021563834,0.00011007059,0.00009607727,0.000018795767,0.00004152118,0.006623152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928982,0.0028702945,0.00032348302,0.001126581,0.0016783206,0.0011030895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914278,0.0052654925,0.00093175675,0.0013498899,0.0007024976,0.00032251544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007866667,0.00042767506,0.00073165155,0.0016815877,0.004222253,0.005361628,0.0015126863,0.004292113,0.003620309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010185813,0.0003608471,0.001004949,0.000872272,0.053691126,0.010131693,0.005759154,0.0050077606,0.00020886617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034007178,0.0000052718183,0.0001821091,0.000015078001,0.000003049928,0.000036204336,0.0005614477,0.00015838354,0.000043484044,0.99767786,0.00013340474,0.0011804829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005087341,0.000009945496,0.0004960367,0.000043786687,0.0000064007572,0.000058584905,0.0004574391,0.00031707328,0.00020090904,0.99074465,0.0076515735,0.000008518101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00400407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046005496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007866667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042946916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004417044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041603386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257735315","doi":"10.32920/22227895","title":"Quantum Physics in Private Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Analogy; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Distributive justice; Distributive property; Law; Private law; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Physics; Public law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.10301482669780558,"score_gpt":0.37910199107275633,"score_spread":0.27608716437495073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257735315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027778499,0.023804449,0.08487483,0.16936052,0.0019365682,0.00009184484,0.00017135196,0.00017141686,0.69181055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8959597,0.005678129,0.015529855,0.014800135,0.0016815214,0.00016591637,0.000057842302,0.000098761506,0.06602812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981008,0.0008572775,0.000042830776,0.00024674833,0.0005467411,0.00020558576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841034,0.0009754653,0.00008493623,0.00021860837,0.00020170286,0.00010879445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003069926,0.00027023608,0.00041243643,0.00096349913,0.00422939,0.0046063857,0.00068605115,0.004100054,0.0060553607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051468676,0.0002915101,0.00057115534,0.00075035257,0.019417617,0.008552146,0.0031738547,0.0051226355,0.0008054206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8602264e-7,0.0000016932071,0.000008255003,0.0000026429732,3.3896583e-7,0.000004268165,0.00006862438,0.000050730232,0.000011613356,0.99838483,0.00094606914,0.00052026234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018045757,0.0000015244037,0.000032832722,0.0000070456126,4.708253e-7,0.0000057905686,0.000036140078,0.0002706843,0.000021909678,0.99087745,0.008742468,0.0000018973825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070311283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037590116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070311283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00535875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032662817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038880646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257952031","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Duties of the Crown to Maori: Will the Canadian Remedy Travel?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Indigenous; Duty; Context (archaeology); Law; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.022688905652476495,"score_gpt":0.302796489152118,"score_spread":0.2801075834996415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257952031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11099306,0.031385023,0.0024918916,0.31013116,0.00069268415,0.00007249446,0.0002090017,0.000043593376,0.54398113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855844,0.012171298,0.0014974115,0.016226998,0.00021042344,0.000024384406,0.000035226778,0.00001854141,0.084231295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804294,0.00020993671,0.00003457693,0.00015554923,0.0007388997,0.00081803015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836165,0.00047230732,0.0001562462,0.00007042957,0.0006870959,0.00025224107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017308408,0.00017695459,0.0003106354,0.00093055895,0.011936687,0.006275853,0.0012776405,0.0047407383,0.004596725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062729423,0.00017992195,0.00023803778,0.0014699916,0.0114597725,0.0028753537,0.0015686817,0.0034955519,0.0002958107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016101805,0.000011168487,0.0019349902,0.000084680985,0.00000782704,0.00026617825,0.007141141,0.00019894692,0.00029746853,0.93572384,0.026562471,0.027755257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036542322,0.000057309157,0.025077356,0.000716766,0.000072604926,0.00049036025,0.039264314,0.0012537119,0.0007397249,0.1949454,0.7372179,0.00012798644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97195756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98830545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051909406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051909406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090047695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37663084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258178350","doi":"10.29173/alr355","title":"A Team Production Theory of Canadian Corporate Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Corporate governance; Stakeholder; Shareholder; Norm (philosophy); Oppression; Corporate group; Corporate security; Corporate communication; Law; Law and economics; Shareholder primacy; Corporate action; Political science; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.11170416533917271,"score_gpt":0.3185025572744551,"score_spread":0.20679839193528238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258178350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009205396,0.0010832774,0.07024353,0.011378631,0.00022388104,0.00014770155,0.00021027846,0.000097168784,0.90741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.837166,0.0017952989,0.02667603,0.002358299,0.00030209104,0.00026583264,0.00024913694,0.000072819596,0.13111442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958889,0.00063210627,0.000080585014,0.0005645006,0.0021489367,0.00068499485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708766,0.0008865616,0.0002082374,0.00027785872,0.0011501636,0.0003896112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030789727,0.00050020544,0.00034623014,0.002609461,0.0062510436,0.006058975,0.0018657553,0.0022735903,0.014249701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069776424,0.00030563,0.00065866887,0.0024148147,0.012487958,0.004323126,0.0023679617,0.0022235224,0.0009910209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.3967185e-7,0.0000015679421,0.000074030664,0.0000048477787,6.9534957e-7,0.00001514244,0.00023890077,0.0002615854,0.0000104578285,0.99531806,0.0019762637,0.0020975943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015986665,0.000009217504,0.0008389081,0.00006192699,0.000007903436,0.00005255315,0.0004994271,0.0055003036,0.000089890396,0.8991099,0.093800545,0.000013515029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5923529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45201734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40764707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03993162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035846204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82009554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258189201","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004872","title":"What can Kant Teach Us about Legal Classification?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.025079288045823062,"score_gpt":0.32102443089366073,"score_spread":0.2959451428478377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258189201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019550694,0.02754213,0.08155359,0.50317454,0.0028557426,0.000032714812,0.00015574995,0.00024553057,0.36488938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9002366,0.014016483,0.029900331,0.030672038,0.0032750124,0.00014567866,0.00013383047,0.0001716953,0.021448411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260336,0.0047085513,0.00020599132,0.0005749482,0.0012869161,0.0006202468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940428,0.0038804233,0.00042111374,0.00074595865,0.0005857139,0.00032386207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006929556,0.0006965924,0.0009311674,0.0026859,0.007185129,0.010841165,0.001551073,0.0053634564,0.0035173649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00935574,0.00047135295,0.00078276935,0.0021796331,0.052667875,0.020996828,0.0036810979,0.0090184165,0.0012628447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028177674,0.0000021470266,0.000058409256,0.000011968827,0.0000015378313,0.000004711939,0.00097240286,0.00006681178,0.000006952366,0.99434197,0.0021782112,0.0023520114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002674325,0.000003134616,0.000057155492,0.000039742525,0.0000013991635,0.000010063512,0.00053103606,0.00014159644,0.000024543668,0.97524923,0.023934424,0.0000050149238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074114418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052972874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010841165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009078184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004334168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065867186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258533185","doi":"","title":"Res Ipsa Loquitur: Some Recent Cases in Singapore and its Future","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res ipsa loquitur; Plaintiff; Circumstantial evidence; Prima facie; Presumption; Tort; Law; Contributory negligence; Accident (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016663607646441862,"score_gpt":0.3018938222634857,"score_spread":0.28523021461704384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258533185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6347074,0.043182544,0.0011806589,0.10905787,0.0016805691,0.00032515055,0.0014863899,0.00012267203,0.20825669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8773594,0.030609723,0.0013328714,0.036020234,0.00095439696,0.00018683361,0.00091137266,0.00004500535,0.052580133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680626,0.0007564424,0.00047300354,0.00032886115,0.0011025155,0.0005329233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938275,0.0015291545,0.0020779825,0.00045060934,0.0012071047,0.00090749696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058301687,0.00063507655,0.00043331145,0.0024674863,0.0055407085,0.004490582,0.0021128342,0.0068568806,0.0051110666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063249078,0.0006798983,0.0016838834,0.005854014,0.0050700624,0.003942185,0.0029792916,0.004989478,0.00076064817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003630975,0.0008579481,0.12340564,0.0039071334,0.00043360662,0.19057623,0.07768106,0.0032107523,0.0042868047,0.27853543,0.20979933,0.10694291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087830354,0.00033346596,0.13378839,0.0013643546,0.00025764454,0.032394383,0.022794109,0.0015510315,0.0015388901,0.0094769625,0.7960318,0.00038131996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088839754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22048882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088839754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011895205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007137185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17664534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258595339","doi":"","title":"Tax, Equity, and the Priority of Property Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Taxpayer; Equity (law); Liability; Legislature; Business; Law and economics; Income tax; Tax law; Double taxation; Law; Economics; Accounting; Public economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.023002571567571677,"score_gpt":0.3234787826996857,"score_spread":0.30047621113211403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258595339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12761422,0.012294179,0.020780185,0.12463344,0.0006608646,0.00010540307,0.000069544236,0.00003531089,0.71380675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98099524,0.0015711435,0.0022451303,0.0029486082,0.00031758365,0.000024260497,0.000012018822,0.000011795826,0.011874185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657464,0.0012438728,0.00012891516,0.00039788533,0.0010052383,0.0006494021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609476,0.0021789088,0.00044129047,0.00025534528,0.0005598474,0.00046990227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053358967,0.00025263603,0.000470309,0.0014808916,0.004842405,0.009577335,0.0006938097,0.0040126992,0.0039746305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010186702,0.00032148222,0.000339932,0.0009787448,0.031758573,0.008509995,0.0033696508,0.005664161,0.00022932714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027500823,0.0000049807436,0.00018151524,0.000005617031,0.0000011370149,0.000026343587,0.0005560994,0.000056626224,0.000036951726,0.9968076,0.00046775796,0.0018526246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012373182,0.000012456877,0.00085148343,0.000049735885,0.0000046298164,0.000056694953,0.00072967605,0.00031945232,0.00010473474,0.97833985,0.019512419,0.000006463258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026331902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026756942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026331902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012740064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00796646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092436016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259137867","doi":"","title":"Commercial relationships and the burgeoning fiduciary principle","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Unconscionability; Redress; Expansive; Project commissioning; Law; Publishing; Commercial law; Common law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.21663686483644823,"score_gpt":0.4257066596023728,"score_spread":0.20906979476592458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259137867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044983625,0.013758954,0.032485634,0.16565682,0.0005873509,0.00010329778,0.000039182556,0.000059286973,0.74232584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9163359,0.003951061,0.009281913,0.023902206,0.0005243051,0.00015412498,0.000019370716,0.00004647981,0.04578449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783725,0.009041763,0.00073958584,0.002359371,0.0068498007,0.0026370885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847067,0.0094609205,0.0012807726,0.0009652282,0.0024914048,0.0010949806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020067433,0.0003813559,0.0007598791,0.0020420125,0.016684586,0.013707935,0.0017880762,0.013414321,0.0035563328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0224307,0.00074663776,0.00067308306,0.0019180531,0.08250139,0.008049966,0.008775304,0.011846727,0.0007220911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010186515,0.0000030618166,0.00007257646,0.000007573445,0.0000010046105,0.000034369048,0.001273926,0.000037129674,0.000021808559,0.99443334,0.0017052437,0.0024090025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013748392,0.000026068057,0.0011843168,0.00021612569,0.0000073329097,0.0002366096,0.0020056213,0.00063082954,0.00013087838,0.8455731,0.14993961,0.000035795823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09213022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09219351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09213022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016193943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023095803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1831879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259327368","doi":"","title":"Contract: Not Promise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florida State University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Speech act; Morality; Law and economics; Law; The Venerable; Severability; Epistemology; Economics; Political science; Exclusion clause; Philosophy; Contract management; Linguistics; Privity of contract","score_opus":0.027689701588782308,"score_gpt":0.29535828092898647,"score_spread":0.26766857934020416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259327368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007459151,0.012434451,0.06824866,0.118585095,0.0018271621,0.00015251644,0.00030071117,0.00014096376,0.7908513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75839067,0.009930379,0.021945795,0.04773971,0.0033139416,0.0010564318,0.00029929605,0.0003227258,0.15700094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97757554,0.008831784,0.0011222797,0.004218203,0.0061675957,0.0020846738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98677117,0.0065772748,0.0009855272,0.0028638456,0.0020536096,0.0007485811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018390803,0.0007192992,0.0012878745,0.0013879034,0.008680462,0.012693936,0.0025320288,0.011731851,0.012142959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03049266,0.0007488436,0.0011249358,0.0017322436,0.048860837,0.027281988,0.0057836836,0.01260777,0.0031201357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030184951,0.0000014764844,0.000020478157,0.000012574449,0.0000015317571,0.000010620959,0.00021650326,0.000028011658,0.000009222221,0.9971378,0.0017603211,0.00079845096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010290455,0.000014431035,0.00007921802,0.00010858646,0.0000056491567,0.00010206164,0.00035994168,0.00018998233,0.00005867887,0.89417624,0.10488445,0.000010580196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01022863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063109635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018390803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008521719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010764496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09726101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259391156","doi":"","title":"Common Law Within Three Federations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Federal common law; Political science; Statutory law; Statute; Jurisdiction; Federal law; Public law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Private law; Legislation","score_opus":0.01862920445623124,"score_gpt":0.31923298118839116,"score_spread":0.30060377673215993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259391156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32170725,0.0019050973,0.022552514,0.014569266,0.0003397081,0.00024999364,0.00016681469,0.00021027408,0.6382991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97191226,0.00033128925,0.0037196204,0.0009236603,0.00003989632,0.0000907518,0.00006474262,0.000013414106,0.022904327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089336,0.0017875081,0.00031886675,0.0014564493,0.0021237186,0.003420163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99520195,0.00080488855,0.0006219083,0.0007229314,0.0014538195,0.0011945606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051371153,0.00020350904,0.00042257112,0.0021539787,0.015632756,0.009713497,0.0012554306,0.0025273978,0.0038886522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009297971,0.00031282453,0.00071931083,0.002020668,0.016888695,0.0051476387,0.007139753,0.0031164256,0.00032277757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008603717,0.000013117675,0.0016140227,0.000010566516,0.0000037144277,0.000061956096,0.0056904587,0.00016549663,0.000087131295,0.9842285,0.0017339435,0.006382576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049394806,0.00010629405,0.03473752,0.00039255118,0.00006990527,0.0005354926,0.025906883,0.004926642,0.0008337998,0.5354158,0.39688483,0.00014098565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23863065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1571198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23863065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022147136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030016221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4744833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259441428","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Romantic Conception of Fiduciary Obligation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Opportunism; Obligation; Accountability; Law; Romance; Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Power (physics); Political science; Function (biology); Injustice; Business; Sociology; Duty; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.009241593068408186,"score_gpt":0.30427528575924256,"score_spread":0.2950336926908344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259441428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020593971,0.75003004,0.0016463547,0.14110896,0.023606863,0.000019482915,0.00023148817,0.000046957426,0.083103955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011781947,0.6735118,0.0015656966,0.122776546,0.047776062,0.0001354321,0.00034975848,0.00016251403,0.14194027],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998374,0.00048071207,0.000079250836,0.0002042239,0.0007746082,0.00008728708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944537,0.003878462,0.00030216193,0.00016710696,0.0010162006,0.00018232387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001654539,0.0005014997,0.00088295207,0.002885668,0.0009806616,0.0048498055,0.001000127,0.0034747238,0.015490292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008804469,0.0003309781,0.0003358931,0.0039271093,0.0027533441,0.004586001,0.0010848199,0.0052909167,0.007806691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071990917,0.000005665297,0.000036770045,0.00032799,0.0000074047844,0.000029142502,0.00008786873,0.000081257225,0.000029968647,0.053903,0.9092789,0.036204807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032145065,0.000005364968,0.000102415455,0.00048037796,0.000003783513,0.00008016097,0.000029434532,0.000028668843,0.000018217255,0.010746497,0.9884968,0.0000051142865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053335535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093995845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015490292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003743928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004234874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05182022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259724464","doi":"","title":"An Intimate Approach to Fairness, Impartiality and Reasonableness in Administrative Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Administrative law; Objectivity (philosophy); Adversarial system; Objectification; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04083688280241292,"score_gpt":0.3394859486080021,"score_spread":0.29864906580558914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259724464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030085485,0.009969385,0.35636,0.08792498,0.0010811896,0.00015273492,0.00007171388,0.00013462841,0.5142199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95023954,0.0025661173,0.026771255,0.00596894,0.0020296774,0.00025144487,0.000024940875,0.00007410147,0.012074016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95809823,0.026789224,0.0015647943,0.003401993,0.0071864896,0.0029592353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746815,0.017270742,0.0019317722,0.003599882,0.0015835774,0.00093252223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028347166,0.00059893954,0.0011695598,0.002741505,0.011636427,0.016603366,0.0032813216,0.010084606,0.0043415613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033881582,0.0006179411,0.0016149769,0.0022659074,0.09249475,0.019210229,0.010630006,0.013120524,0.0006841557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011007809,0.00000383386,0.000032761283,0.0000049852833,0.0000011640655,0.000010455957,0.00063033355,0.00007235108,0.00000855607,0.99853754,0.00012343974,0.0005735649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031192017,0.000008160514,0.000064411666,0.000027438939,0.000002600272,0.000029493913,0.00023198583,0.00025492563,0.00003512601,0.9919051,0.0074316114,0.000005996168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043879827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025701162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028347166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008666879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074893166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14991593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259980794","doi":"","title":"Director Duties: A Fiduciary Duty to Confess","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Appeal; Law; Foundation (evidence); Business; Political science","score_opus":0.009044581719259485,"score_gpt":0.2896431764264464,"score_spread":0.2805985947071869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259980794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034971263,0.0023615453,0.016073037,0.19333541,0.0022249522,0.00013590687,0.00039489986,0.00021568956,0.7502873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7094362,0.0007550701,0.006527922,0.10956,0.0013300017,0.00026256108,0.0001248427,0.0000839728,0.1719196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98629934,0.0035695645,0.0010508692,0.0022063332,0.0043613845,0.002512561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862964,0.006861087,0.0014317029,0.0021769383,0.002337651,0.0008961512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011110869,0.00039127393,0.0007219727,0.0008131221,0.007061377,0.008520305,0.0015793842,0.016040228,0.01010275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028443608,0.0005835813,0.000574782,0.0005908267,0.011102972,0.0052482807,0.0041654785,0.008962143,0.003040648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023330287,0.000019834857,0.00058735715,0.000027034508,0.0000064632945,0.00012245466,0.0013107046,0.000035790286,0.00023952674,0.9606182,0.03289256,0.0041168747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011157729,0.000118776006,0.0027589647,0.00035254986,0.00006274403,0.001048309,0.0019294588,0.0006893651,0.0032507563,0.25911573,0.730429,0.00013284585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008327276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013290631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016040228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039587338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007777997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058760583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260037689","doi":"","title":"Fashioning Legal Authority from Power: The Crown-Native Fiduciary Relationship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Fiduciary; Law; Surrender; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Treaty; Power (physics); Crown (dentistry); State (computer science); Politics; Duty","score_opus":0.014936744912418979,"score_gpt":0.29048295718427897,"score_spread":0.27554621227186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260037689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048897732,0.0036475896,0.010956939,0.05663369,0.00027014708,0.00005216155,0.00005519392,0.000055182976,0.8794314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579828,0.0009816433,0.0020442468,0.0065461732,0.000114271366,0.000027457289,0.000015443355,0.000029521292,0.03225835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281454,0.0015324614,0.00018052451,0.00074788235,0.0023521911,0.0023724353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950597,0.0025010344,0.0003176341,0.00031551713,0.0010809492,0.0007251425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058714137,0.00025510055,0.0005702706,0.001446228,0.021601062,0.0150957005,0.0018245033,0.0072389604,0.004726922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012596306,0.0003704959,0.0003644146,0.0020278175,0.060551897,0.004914338,0.0058330935,0.008698127,0.0005148668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017630178,0.0000020690425,0.00013921119,0.000003862665,9.707048e-7,0.00006282314,0.0036248337,0.000033732995,0.000023096383,0.99355894,0.0012866241,0.0012621693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037470785,0.000021113752,0.002553584,0.0002665555,0.000031094605,0.00029681675,0.0110173,0.00097466155,0.00038755496,0.7624253,0.22192977,0.000058711594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7787668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81908983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7787668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048679374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070059925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4450721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260124866","doi":"","title":"Suing anonymously : when is the personal price to pay for justice too high?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Anonymity; Law; Economic Justice; Harm; Political science; Test (biology); Confidentiality","score_opus":0.025923945083625437,"score_gpt":0.2897686665710277,"score_spread":0.26384472148740223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260124866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20117521,0.0028508897,0.01833724,0.40978888,0.0022966275,0.0001567419,0.00016758428,0.000119807126,0.365107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558933,0.0005659481,0.001740907,0.028979639,0.00061191304,0.00005553413,0.000019105648,0.000033523273,0.0121001005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984698,0.0049569206,0.0005445418,0.0015045359,0.0041368133,0.0041592186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979818,0.01120891,0.0023423592,0.001595057,0.0025361406,0.002499529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013303757,0.00030539083,0.00072692765,0.0010304173,0.0076572895,0.009615934,0.0016116964,0.013335904,0.006664195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04398829,0.0003066109,0.0005215073,0.00063137437,0.024283158,0.010883683,0.0045193224,0.008785261,0.0008855134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046049994,0.000046677585,0.0057753306,0.00003767427,0.000029446148,0.0010911833,0.0068610604,0.000116482544,0.0004151668,0.9515893,0.017224276,0.016767483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006425094,0.00017896657,0.011641714,0.0005102994,0.00009032003,0.0025631194,0.0295316,0.0017490739,0.0013013597,0.83528405,0.11690775,0.00017763143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017321056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02370134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017321056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048668305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071996516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07035786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260382374","doi":"","title":"Is Duke v. Andler Still Good Law in Common Law Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Common law; Jurisdiction; Choice of law; Argument (complex analysis); Precedent","score_opus":0.022678176565941878,"score_gpt":0.27342232861849375,"score_spread":0.25074415205255185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260382374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02831432,0.006390622,0.002278831,0.3344956,0.0016255853,0.000077920675,0.00059615594,0.000107664026,0.6261133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75073195,0.0047502196,0.0025883468,0.106044844,0.0006858917,0.00006876919,0.00029340052,0.000091615555,0.13474502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924589,0.0007464368,0.00012803159,0.0011854632,0.002774577,0.0027066215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952931,0.0010671383,0.0002629063,0.00030152538,0.0018232296,0.0012520594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031101082,0.00027979372,0.00069907366,0.0012591849,0.018836688,0.011009801,0.0020567118,0.007533325,0.009321203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010590206,0.00030319675,0.0004579869,0.001823906,0.021325454,0.0043492713,0.0023968576,0.0061657797,0.0009314283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012568388,0.0000084254325,0.0005794952,0.000019851146,0.0000061250394,0.00012054709,0.0016873991,0.00009607232,0.000091812486,0.9445416,0.04804613,0.0047899084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048994098,0.000023311588,0.0033098084,0.00024875725,0.000042364154,0.00011220422,0.005495539,0.0004351394,0.00036136163,0.2104416,0.7793404,0.00014059865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9691909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97734135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07864397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07864397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11869639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5706046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260504655","doi":"10.29173/alr1280","title":"Constitutional Accommodation and the Rule(s) of Courts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Constitutional court; Legislature; Judicial activism; Rule of law; Supreme court; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.02170901885517248,"score_gpt":0.32662018382578567,"score_spread":0.3049111649706132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260504655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030241393,0.0030321751,0.11759647,0.029779429,0.0018220225,0.0003855765,0.00040505183,0.0003552182,0.81638277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87846947,0.0012690696,0.03827932,0.010916912,0.0019259261,0.0007095601,0.0003186602,0.00015851704,0.06795251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97156084,0.009017629,0.0028158522,0.007332602,0.006087521,0.0031854927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982236,0.008233766,0.0013423773,0.0044464986,0.002930378,0.00081106636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016398301,0.0004162175,0.000990047,0.0017301579,0.006470294,0.016750341,0.0032410827,0.007658119,0.006690509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032316852,0.0009784241,0.0009810737,0.0014129067,0.031081174,0.012555374,0.004507689,0.01060421,0.0022915897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024982212,0.0000030442677,0.000033073953,0.0000061079863,0.000001476611,0.000012966591,0.00017432247,0.00006516689,0.000035276476,0.9977551,0.0005460339,0.0013649925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032802614,0.000020561758,0.00018006493,0.00007127567,0.000013438051,0.0000582028,0.00025204243,0.0004844398,0.00030380557,0.92143863,0.077116475,0.00002820329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009840917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057922285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016750341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006002218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008394472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08672351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260695609","doi":"","title":"Restitutionary Recovery Ex Aquo Et Bono. Roxborough V Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Common law; Statutory law; Political science; Schism","score_opus":0.030538984284305452,"score_gpt":0.3327938246151876,"score_spread":0.3022548403308821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260695609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043026738,0.014301267,0.0009437032,0.06710106,0.0015784247,0.00018665277,0.00051424943,0.00013107239,0.8722167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3086068,0.0022501796,0.00050694507,0.055229843,0.0003361437,0.00016374543,0.0001980088,0.000037983333,0.63267034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982886,0.00027273383,0.000065309396,0.00029660398,0.00041110712,0.0006656344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993931,0.00026119934,0.00007147068,0.000038237842,0.0001224247,0.00011350371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014235908,0.0004562039,0.0003240436,0.0006097232,0.0076372786,0.003003639,0.0011631342,0.008151964,0.014048209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030315523,0.00073213805,0.0004676941,0.0005064998,0.0025717106,0.0016941451,0.002427729,0.005912616,0.0017524485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014516384,0.000060061673,0.0033639644,0.00018567198,0.000021661457,0.0019692394,0.0055598076,0.00016548691,0.0008176723,0.71408117,0.24919108,0.02443909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007609855,0.00009952315,0.018120684,0.00026849608,0.000034012806,0.00067439064,0.0021402421,0.00045929378,0.0007436271,0.028965045,0.94833994,0.00007855418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33720398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57518584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33720398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059013204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007037876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67048246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260835105","doi":"","title":"A U.S. Perspective on the Contextual Terrain of Political Economy in Insolvency Reform","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Politics; Creditor; Legislature; Political economy; Power (physics); Debtor; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Economy; Market economy; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.016216673716218714,"score_gpt":0.32221727351264035,"score_spread":0.30600059979642164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260835105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024986185,0.033403337,0.0025906859,0.14459826,0.0010807901,0.000025846815,0.00018420459,0.000038889353,0.7930918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322912,0.012881854,0.001114436,0.028905245,0.00082885963,0.00010720672,0.00008064491,0.00004719946,0.023743311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729055,0.0014793896,0.00004953338,0.00020152966,0.00027551252,0.000703513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845934,0.0009536823,0.00015655743,0.0000958485,0.00016059076,0.00017405683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023235858,0.00034632112,0.0003729177,0.0017924646,0.011305047,0.015279584,0.000828164,0.005094346,0.0068195034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003073882,0.00033952622,0.00050199137,0.0036587354,0.019980347,0.0056990646,0.0030062445,0.006864133,0.0004811385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030519327,0.000005110864,0.00012126708,0.000009050334,9.0953483e-7,0.0000306601,0.0015222665,0.000077841236,0.000020405689,0.992098,0.004555008,0.0015565042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016611955,0.00003388225,0.0035565028,0.0005923009,0.00002014795,0.000080107435,0.012826516,0.0004677755,0.00022781911,0.5973987,0.38475272,0.000026863176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13309728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21727295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13309728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022929557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009441439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26464516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261090877","doi":"","title":"Solicitors’ Conflict of Interest and the Wider Fiduciary Question","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Conflict of interest; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.08933030811814388,"score_gpt":0.42236889376882125,"score_spread":0.33303858565067734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261090877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09458895,0.010248723,0.017982464,0.33495384,0.00072986895,0.00009055805,0.000062345855,0.00001643863,0.5413269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95940614,0.0013368869,0.001828461,0.024255073,0.00048625085,0.000082442464,0.000015706146,0.000012943941,0.012576043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817686,0.008132881,0.0007928074,0.0016612483,0.0046096435,0.0030347765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773488,0.01714243,0.0015921764,0.0010102562,0.0019506654,0.00095558236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02471862,0.00035922858,0.00076794927,0.001520515,0.014502476,0.01257028,0.0028378842,0.018556029,0.003803934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028386842,0.00051985506,0.0005840821,0.0014689261,0.07330858,0.009836658,0.006597796,0.0152951395,0.00041596143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025519896,0.0000044478006,0.0001347887,0.000004487844,0.0000015504884,0.000060179398,0.0026244214,0.00003358293,0.000021808673,0.99541026,0.00073374435,0.00096829043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025032628,0.00001591389,0.00085896545,0.000253127,0.000010318232,0.00025989444,0.007879552,0.00047656818,0.00020769934,0.9214038,0.06857376,0.00003535786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06294888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0657542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06294888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019475471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020607637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14130515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261148905","doi":"","title":"Characterization of Proprietary Restitution in the Conflict of Laws","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Private law; Law; Constructive trust; Conflict of laws; Municipal law; Wrongdoing; Common law; Political science; Public law; Philosophy of law; International law; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03096040995422185,"score_gpt":0.31168084110781424,"score_spread":0.2807204311535924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261148905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27166888,0.002431607,0.14882977,0.0102736205,0.0001624665,0.00026722308,0.00019656535,0.0000949132,0.56607485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891867,0.00026662607,0.004875549,0.00027870265,0.00007836932,0.0001207543,0.00004716524,0.000018758818,0.0051272707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913953,0.003774625,0.00067897775,0.0011055947,0.0020662989,0.0009791859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841493,0.0089320615,0.0030429277,0.0019861653,0.0013525051,0.00053705845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006095566,0.0003643166,0.0007502035,0.00417276,0.0046346826,0.010324362,0.0018988721,0.004655028,0.006454496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020444697,0.000382577,0.00094701786,0.002906662,0.02902166,0.014981343,0.0066860165,0.0045656757,0.00045576924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000272656,0.0000065995127,0.00031377937,0.000005408643,0.0000019126187,0.00007067012,0.00086459063,0.00020452743,0.00004609464,0.9976394,0.00010003487,0.0007443751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006976637,0.000014848872,0.0011266344,0.00005417219,0.000008154843,0.00039401202,0.0019619716,0.004760213,0.00027597122,0.9824719,0.008906737,0.000018429348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022124872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010486116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010324362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055647166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023491024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040375054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261212663","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 1999-2000 Term","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Administrative law; Political science; Standard of review; Discretion; High Court; Judicial deference; Intervention (counseling); Medicine","score_opus":0.021061939131649367,"score_gpt":0.32250973499181324,"score_spread":0.30144779586016385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261212663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026686458,0.14191578,0.0030805375,0.1675874,0.0069918074,0.00031438342,0.00092586514,0.00012114482,0.65237665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38894844,0.09101556,0.0055671236,0.25929728,0.004915165,0.0004639298,0.001369829,0.00012470406,0.24829799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97745466,0.001692856,0.001076015,0.00136102,0.016236741,0.0021787072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98069316,0.0053249304,0.0015581559,0.000685416,0.010449184,0.0012891635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010599108,0.00046819614,0.000507407,0.0048686485,0.009741999,0.024187462,0.0034035651,0.010825651,0.0019291772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023362178,0.000728014,0.0007129425,0.008652656,0.012361369,0.004694955,0.002782106,0.009871062,0.0005957627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033026776,0.000053427277,0.0012660222,0.00031595395,0.000012990309,0.0006033737,0.0055130264,0.00042311233,0.0006031358,0.8124607,0.13952294,0.039192285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095207215,0.000020202822,0.005972886,0.0006263284,0.000011455992,0.00017169386,0.0009106873,0.000111309935,0.00021957632,0.006773181,0.98514396,0.000029218601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89615214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9247491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89615214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17163031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1430874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9607914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261216919","doi":"","title":"Keeping Settlements Secret","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florida State University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Plaintiff; Human settlement; Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Arbitration; Private rights; Civil litigation; Public interest; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Engineering; Payment","score_opus":0.024308332495932443,"score_gpt":0.2929339959611649,"score_spread":0.2686256634652324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261216919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025492845,0.0032825447,0.048308056,0.04775514,0.0028802576,0.0002564515,0.0004918012,0.00081342016,0.8707195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6263795,0.00277406,0.01369884,0.01097945,0.0015957942,0.0003461322,0.00053522293,0.0007182108,0.3429728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98882943,0.0026358834,0.0008708007,0.0018709868,0.003821464,0.0019714716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98396295,0.0040864735,0.0015722592,0.006604965,0.0025475887,0.0012257157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01027184,0.0005657001,0.0008901661,0.0022291883,0.009532556,0.016070435,0.0032258618,0.00829922,0.05570699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048197668,0.00079801213,0.0010113158,0.0017427308,0.007074486,0.01621684,0.014052887,0.007462102,0.020427084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043704564,0.00003505015,0.00075600785,0.00006805187,0.000019273602,0.00032610225,0.0022636836,0.00044715015,0.00046609755,0.89452684,0.05948401,0.041563954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004574578,0.00004673914,0.00082654285,0.00029230135,0.000050890994,0.00034039805,0.0025552192,0.0010809712,0.0013039511,0.37649003,0.61692625,0.0000410608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036871172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047830218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05570699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036716906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009143445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18635845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261242864","doi":"","title":"The Adulteration of Fiduciary Doctrine in Corporate Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Fiduciary; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Corporate law; Context (archaeology); Law; Accountability; Law and economics; Political science; Duty of loyalty; Corporate governance; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.011077553194458594,"score_gpt":0.26854009897173026,"score_spread":0.2574625457772717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261242864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06032311,0.038259543,0.18229774,0.12838764,0.0030133596,0.00008551178,0.00012161455,0.00023383563,0.58727753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93372285,0.005391124,0.019941375,0.013594754,0.0023008226,0.00013300877,0.000041336127,0.00009090406,0.024783738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866415,0.006115053,0.0005992286,0.0020511008,0.0036379262,0.0009551568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98603386,0.009022503,0.0010777612,0.0019099145,0.0016513547,0.0003045568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015739903,0.000486121,0.0007302657,0.0020002602,0.0054915003,0.008558468,0.0014034823,0.007678425,0.0016474882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023020422,0.0005260141,0.0007145747,0.0015740665,0.05873896,0.011781734,0.0042934334,0.014824738,0.00059738004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027960662,0.0000026421853,0.000030606436,0.0000066378743,6.6862646e-7,0.000010617667,0.0006099287,0.00003607035,0.00003128167,0.99674404,0.00055123697,0.001973563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011541254,0.000043581873,0.00023802287,0.0001044539,0.0000037072118,0.000097516735,0.0002452293,0.00060369284,0.00025887077,0.9322915,0.06608273,0.000019289497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051731616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027342974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015739903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008330072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056255367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08324158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261428912","doi":"","title":"A Critical Notice of the Law and Ethics of Restitution by Hanoch Dagan","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Notice; Unjust enrichment; Common law; Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02004582140499659,"score_gpt":0.3581250770824387,"score_spread":0.33807925567744207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261428912","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00502198,0.058753796,0.0014959676,0.8045739,0.007657773,0.000022522549,0.00003767812,0.000026397955,0.122409984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4112015,0.050109692,0.0026330007,0.37018,0.011153538,0.00016608914,0.00005914719,0.00014725493,0.15434976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477357,0.0026042142,0.00011082396,0.00044683105,0.0012507448,0.00081380375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966233,0.0024936032,0.00011475865,0.0001386337,0.000346714,0.00028305285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004829018,0.00042555566,0.00063020556,0.0008912147,0.012559377,0.007307564,0.0017624655,0.0067526707,0.0021372784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006517307,0.00052013487,0.00038608955,0.0011809692,0.024726603,0.008918095,0.004058863,0.013411954,0.0005481382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012775983,0.000014989221,0.000089951885,0.00003615461,0.0000025119693,0.00008694108,0.005672694,0.00010171482,0.00006192664,0.75782937,0.22971566,0.0063752756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010006271,0.000011098273,0.00038906015,0.00026459707,0.0000035267528,0.00008472469,0.0037958683,0.00017835444,0.00011127339,0.25008333,0.745038,0.000030212688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0355271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046849247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0355271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015675887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111447545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11373705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261825313","doi":"","title":"Sovereignty's Promise -- 'Fiduciary Relationships and the Presumption of Trust'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Presumption; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; State (computer science); Business; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.03965746575257893,"score_gpt":0.27014454013450667,"score_spread":0.23048707438192773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261825313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010639949,0.03545031,0.053905804,0.11589166,0.00293939,0.00007149761,0.00011753332,0.00008537572,0.78089845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77768666,0.028677756,0.011891428,0.021238249,0.0032639632,0.00019978784,0.00015164976,0.0001764511,0.15671408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957124,0.0022087016,0.00016070463,0.00037648738,0.0010617913,0.0004799699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966491,0.0023041016,0.00021676709,0.00035204136,0.0003082292,0.0001698715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042357184,0.00032273206,0.00053069816,0.0006420246,0.0034539339,0.007355161,0.0010681928,0.003904228,0.0084345965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074440027,0.00032657618,0.0007788063,0.001019428,0.020316161,0.010652611,0.0031832824,0.0068811215,0.0014729713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002282633,0.0000031519926,0.00004282474,0.000018533663,0.0000016130261,0.000018814184,0.0011733667,0.00007045788,0.00003152484,0.98888516,0.00701393,0.0027381931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004207057,0.000015912268,0.00021553735,0.00021591177,0.0000047237877,0.00011711758,0.0009026696,0.0002565837,0.00012500472,0.71769476,0.28043416,0.000013429524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003684739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033225715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0084345965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042717173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036492273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03099364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262036474","doi":"","title":"The Non Liability of a Bank (in England) and the (Potential) Liability of the State (in Israel): Pure Economic Loss in Light of Recent Developments - A Comparative Analysis and Evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; State (computer science); Business; Limited liability; Actuarial science; Economics; Law and economics; Accounting; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.011696121088040912,"score_gpt":0.3038663015165471,"score_spread":0.2921701804285062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262036474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6610952,0.027343404,0.0010310503,0.013947021,0.00019903708,0.00007842714,0.00044845653,0.000009510453,0.2958479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983435,0.005799068,0.00011986419,0.0007998788,0.000120375575,0.000021804508,0.0001571971,0.000006459861,0.00954038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451244,0.0014610335,0.0002985602,0.00029664784,0.0023774095,0.0010539528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828416,0.008848112,0.0019069302,0.0004533014,0.0051310896,0.00081898575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062883017,0.00019672474,0.0004152877,0.0039007193,0.0020329587,0.007648458,0.0015200422,0.0021753977,0.006916381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01453883,0.00030313115,0.00047525164,0.0027062434,0.008022904,0.008243143,0.0032475821,0.0026213885,0.0006421691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008960714,0.00042818292,0.13529253,0.0009535256,0.00022261988,0.00598715,0.020426795,0.0028839572,0.0006953486,0.70951545,0.02110568,0.1015928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013462613,0.0015836955,0.5906326,0.0033686333,0.00052243745,0.005949406,0.092207864,0.004609283,0.0020891458,0.078881435,0.21971436,0.00030653403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030559884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057978906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030559884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095829535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033699037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06952953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262085723","doi":"","title":"THE BOUNDARIES OF FIDUCIARY ACCOUNTABILITY","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Opportunism; Commonwealth; Accountability; Confusion; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01171805041878654,"score_gpt":0.30673667095765245,"score_spread":0.2950186205388659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262085723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031348076,0.012188656,0.14448398,0.14027272,0.0012628464,0.00011372257,0.0001679208,0.00018457888,0.6699774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648237,0.0022076704,0.014463661,0.006480618,0.0009382267,0.00037670758,0.00005178058,0.00011226827,0.010545312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9454061,0.03053171,0.0022002412,0.0058425297,0.011474469,0.0045449515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480185,0.031276546,0.0038592005,0.008933139,0.005365307,0.0025474017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035207827,0.00069399556,0.0012151228,0.0045479503,0.011471668,0.020123249,0.002757704,0.0091015445,0.0059669204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078002825,0.0009201715,0.0010513164,0.0026332438,0.09591172,0.02786932,0.015895804,0.014331492,0.001198766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002778924,0.0000022185855,0.00003861108,0.000004714719,9.506005e-7,0.000004804913,0.00040886438,0.000056007877,0.000011498916,0.9978441,0.0004152765,0.0012102134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005443909,0.000005428345,0.000092229115,0.000058457466,0.0000020740451,0.000014229815,0.00027250178,0.0001761289,0.000042714346,0.9867942,0.012530068,0.0000065836252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005250761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022969653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035207827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012667006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014183996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18619901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263216756","doi":"","title":"Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Towards a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Private law; Common law; Law; Legislation; Service (business); Freedom of contract; Business; Public law; Goods and services; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.012837399514260193,"score_gpt":0.32172676528733735,"score_spread":0.30888936577307713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263216756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12293701,0.0025264723,0.08545093,0.18502589,0.00049277896,0.00015284374,0.00006709835,0.00006572886,0.6032812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792843,0.0004139081,0.0054575484,0.004800733,0.00011655178,0.000048612335,0.000015183288,0.000015797656,0.009847403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98212105,0.006553882,0.0005261064,0.0016181113,0.0055422187,0.0036386559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98541325,0.0076202285,0.0016128025,0.0019860354,0.0016333496,0.0017344991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01714429,0.00036942688,0.0007820499,0.0022769861,0.0137902275,0.015521184,0.0023808267,0.010744966,0.0031752868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026266586,0.0005881226,0.0008202333,0.0017015947,0.13267983,0.011559511,0.010504296,0.009570073,0.0005152566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017327623,0.0000038901026,0.0001226107,0.0000031096552,6.1492096e-7,0.00001750704,0.0029464827,0.00005649795,0.000021127693,0.99574727,0.00019164117,0.0008875666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015949687,0.000013530749,0.00056888215,0.00007716352,0.000004254132,0.00006208091,0.0035127604,0.0003845635,0.000096817224,0.9658771,0.029365465,0.000021437061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23494475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18134604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23494475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023001973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05146132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46715444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263490682","doi":"","title":"프랑스채권법개정시안에서의 채무의 양태와 채무의 소멸","year":2009,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"민사법학","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Obligation; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02640892516646573,"score_gpt":0.3345924263814202,"score_spread":0.3081835012149545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263490682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008835596,0.00832434,0.009077665,0.042127207,0.0063866735,0.00011533166,0.00034087666,0.00013754523,0.9246548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17893255,0.013390359,0.008004259,0.021533486,0.0038632404,0.00030809248,0.0005734798,0.00024591235,0.77314866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707425,0.00068220805,0.00009215027,0.00050747464,0.0012812022,0.00036278128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996801,0.00091808225,0.00025546906,0.00031329092,0.001383717,0.0003284188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023565846,0.0004526842,0.0003307548,0.0011110668,0.004797332,0.009688403,0.0010674899,0.0027169008,0.04626671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061804093,0.0002674744,0.0005226905,0.0012818144,0.0059529566,0.0051458613,0.0024726174,0.0043812506,0.014534206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000427499,0.00004855058,0.0009637271,0.0001984438,0.0000122435085,0.00018426043,0.00610203,0.00022352954,0.0005322392,0.7832033,0.14664838,0.061840508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050609206,0.000019919078,0.0011789431,0.0002389103,0.000007696638,0.000104087405,0.0023945745,0.00017010163,0.00048918376,0.03501068,0.96036536,0.00001550431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024693472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03475995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04626671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067379973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0088447835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15477753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263527779","doi":"","title":"Black v Chretien and Suit Against a Minister of the Crown for Abuse of Power, Misfeasance in Public Office and Negligence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Appeal; Law; Prime minister; Ex parte; Power (physics); High Court; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.013301505107876907,"score_gpt":0.26814582984230567,"score_spread":0.25484432473442875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263527779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042161148,0.012090343,0.0004340169,0.30719984,0.0031503695,0.00013245204,0.00021043685,0.00009163815,0.63452965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2925061,0.0028923776,0.00037331914,0.18643546,0.0007729077,0.000068101326,0.00005047904,0.0000729778,0.5168283],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968934,0.00035623697,0.00006222095,0.00030237334,0.0010158588,0.0013699108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819726,0.0006338244,0.0000820642,0.000067824556,0.00043228778,0.00058667915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017042754,0.0003887418,0.00037486907,0.000496588,0.025000181,0.005527343,0.0014792003,0.01872087,0.013863609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007241966,0.00077223015,0.0004800407,0.0005464212,0.0048926785,0.0014611572,0.0018026001,0.013282447,0.0015410322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011116507,0.00004574465,0.0033249676,0.00009427388,0.00002738335,0.0037670787,0.009916274,0.00017488285,0.0011991089,0.25876608,0.71301746,0.009555664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004052148,0.000046568246,0.0075979996,0.00024657074,0.000054278054,0.0007586298,0.007191295,0.00027355718,0.0007577608,0.010057581,0.9728705,0.000104786755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83636343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9435052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16363657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022535803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04184437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32920045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263586990","doi":"10.29173/alr357","title":"Holmes on Law and Morality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Conflation; Terminology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.09505315307533091,"score_gpt":0.38261388789132444,"score_spread":0.28756073481599354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263586990","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065062577,0.2931368,0.0067603234,0.39502594,0.004697508,0.000028737017,0.0000579076,0.00007029805,0.29371625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57664555,0.13156633,0.004477406,0.14737095,0.0059562004,0.00009283507,0.00005865698,0.0001008897,0.13373123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487877,0.0026907257,0.00012307297,0.00038533236,0.001511529,0.00041055048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947642,0.00372142,0.0002375749,0.0002443755,0.0008552142,0.00017726315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004055243,0.0002955987,0.00048892765,0.0019988061,0.0031764053,0.0041653165,0.0009824169,0.0049096555,0.0037823552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008747439,0.00025327274,0.00028302614,0.0013454278,0.021190746,0.0043449537,0.002130364,0.006100539,0.0008950701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034928764,0.0000041017042,0.00007378637,0.00007810634,0.0000027585797,0.000021210708,0.0006914795,0.00007071261,0.000030652318,0.9599607,0.027857086,0.011205835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008146008,0.000012258101,0.00046704264,0.000587536,0.00000644175,0.000046600864,0.00082833384,0.00015767696,0.00011067403,0.6082527,0.38951117,0.000011330881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03353666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027282596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03353666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008289485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084837945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066682935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263597306","doi":"","title":"Costs for Self-Represented Litigants: Principles, Interests and Agendas","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Denial; Representation (politics); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.035859447332855496,"score_gpt":0.3187961777446608,"score_spread":0.2829367304118053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263597306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02593936,0.012902465,0.031163,0.17171496,0.0009292743,0.00017133645,0.00008256263,0.00004530686,0.75705165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8572738,0.0054245135,0.0073515917,0.017922794,0.0012383427,0.00043287294,0.000050374507,0.0001077356,0.110197954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98689747,0.0035124081,0.00045443018,0.0010423001,0.0058691404,0.0022240996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338996,0.0028407713,0.0005779587,0.00050136953,0.0017071323,0.0009827528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00976304,0.00087334437,0.0008581034,0.0022997994,0.010194253,0.022966282,0.0046654656,0.01111957,0.004786953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012276091,0.00066038733,0.0007283089,0.0014366994,0.06278567,0.012989876,0.008521152,0.010721145,0.0006587031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021475762,0.0000071730897,0.00008193437,0.000008563575,0.0000012619665,0.00002283794,0.0006130942,0.00007089206,0.000012072176,0.9961572,0.0015860273,0.001436832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008077923,0.000009479004,0.00038464475,0.00016275028,0.000011518946,0.00008439477,0.0019944082,0.00042263314,0.00008761702,0.93984485,0.056973606,0.000015875663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12012128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13964339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12012128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036169313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037057854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.262428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263918394","doi":"","title":"Class Actions Against the Crown: A Substitution for Judicial Review on Administrative Law Grounds","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Private law; Public law; Law; Obligation; Political science; Administrative law; Common law; Commercial law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06457358110963303,"score_gpt":0.3914400727829227,"score_spread":0.3268664916732897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263918394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051107883,0.0034079226,0.123022005,0.0714626,0.0014210875,0.0004145229,0.000055739998,0.00028872216,0.74881953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212305,0.0007621293,0.03142799,0.01354285,0.0013575312,0.0003996766,0.000014952963,0.00012942089,0.031134957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95340943,0.019959366,0.0015195033,0.0071480237,0.013113005,0.004850723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544258,0.029690767,0.0034305004,0.0072897784,0.003278899,0.0018842426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026194246,0.0005485621,0.0012655184,0.0030786493,0.008187762,0.015771076,0.0037903448,0.018898405,0.007382695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061003443,0.00075129454,0.0013058386,0.0018129668,0.04226813,0.011340551,0.008179457,0.014103645,0.0012724063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053671943,0.000007083291,0.0001258106,0.000008233501,0.0000044038575,0.000049466486,0.00041606327,0.000121880286,0.000080511636,0.99454945,0.0011711152,0.0034605837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075612,0.000076462005,0.00099193,0.00027246567,0.000049039863,0.00026708154,0.0007659024,0.0033685905,0.00061928085,0.9215273,0.07190779,0.00007849937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009654657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016717028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026194246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009317329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014843289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13853008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264095370","doi":"10.29173/alr371","title":"The Use of Foreign Forms to Circumvent Local Liability Rules","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Liability; Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.11660764378653873,"score_gpt":0.35496270349597714,"score_spread":0.2383550597094384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264095370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03651515,0.02889056,0.10941536,0.038744092,0.0012545304,0.00028448552,0.00021629682,0.000358598,0.78432095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71969384,0.015737988,0.06790957,0.036602538,0.0012309116,0.00047036025,0.00020597372,0.00020385535,0.15794502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829365,0.008799975,0.0011716036,0.0017037548,0.004378825,0.0010092825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98355603,0.009440164,0.0016234393,0.0020488186,0.002968868,0.00036267794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017005114,0.0003413632,0.0005078268,0.0028651445,0.0026671016,0.0050308667,0.0020626425,0.004380789,0.00400984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022893589,0.00062779087,0.0007835015,0.0020145578,0.010585057,0.0045728306,0.004518769,0.006979678,0.0011890421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064435876,0.000009657752,0.00046289244,0.00008087123,0.000009997913,0.00012219511,0.00093807804,0.0003428542,0.00014235856,0.9691001,0.010147701,0.018636798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004742175,0.00014368612,0.004407368,0.0013493976,0.000082082835,0.0012289017,0.0011594777,0.0019074897,0.0014369618,0.31985024,0.66830075,0.00008621442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0182118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031682897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0182118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038044997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0087632965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08993274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264400092","doi":"","title":"The Crumbling Wall of Bhadauria: If Not Today, Tomorrow","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Harm; Trespass; Supreme court; Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.014788186764029097,"score_gpt":0.30091393290305213,"score_spread":0.28612574613902303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264400092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036406644,0.03194819,0.0015581275,0.38331836,0.016429702,0.00005293529,0.0004010198,0.00019869496,0.52968633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34264064,0.008810941,0.0020697855,0.092165224,0.0008792084,0.000057214755,0.00026518732,0.00016739486,0.5529444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980877,0.00025199016,0.000028629931,0.00020594432,0.0005611103,0.00086459983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906987,0.00013226336,0.000059429694,0.000041360065,0.0002888374,0.00040828393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093480543,0.0004180765,0.0005471063,0.00073120574,0.024320435,0.012036773,0.0017878124,0.005408036,0.01854614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002639208,0.00042285843,0.00040221863,0.0010869654,0.009118414,0.0066775195,0.004151378,0.011820081,0.0028244858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106575135,0.00006273611,0.003338455,0.00021203648,0.000016908176,0.0013208991,0.026424369,0.00010485841,0.0015428787,0.5097688,0.3914839,0.06561766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008830491,0.00002746374,0.0042477837,0.0003215162,0.000010634574,0.00029363827,0.021519292,0.000046037392,0.00030564956,0.012102489,0.96104586,0.00007084664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5763536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7704855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5763536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017965106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021439832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85228264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264515086","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Accountability of Ordinary Employees","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Mistake; Key (lock); Law and economics; Business; Relation (database); Accounting; Duty; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.014882668924715103,"score_gpt":0.3319998894889402,"score_spread":0.3171172205642251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264515086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12731436,0.003925828,0.07344771,0.12097241,0.0019744847,0.00006779229,0.00012939428,0.00021056832,0.67195743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97031635,0.0004918118,0.003608813,0.006461989,0.0006620311,0.00006740401,0.000020178863,0.00003525356,0.018336272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98452085,0.0063395198,0.0006397103,0.0020640246,0.0037558225,0.0026800244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805095,0.008213758,0.0027404162,0.003589028,0.0031727296,0.0017745995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010860371,0.00027662748,0.00042255258,0.0009131596,0.0059293234,0.0069843684,0.0010778465,0.003928615,0.0027500652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032858603,0.00030267343,0.00033381014,0.0006678616,0.025631957,0.0069749076,0.0063408776,0.0060525085,0.00070376415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009330085,0.0000048903144,0.0003301082,0.000008410832,0.000001937453,0.000027128115,0.0012787898,0.000046992012,0.000083477404,0.99268496,0.0025468653,0.0029771046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020694686,0.000035054876,0.0015642772,0.00010588926,0.000011121514,0.00013169339,0.0009447142,0.00056264806,0.00051228417,0.896759,0.099319756,0.00003280131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004335409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027925647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010860371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035102104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00499648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05743581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264785532","doi":"","title":"Breach of Contract and the Concept of Wrongdoing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Unconscionability; Mistake; Damages; Wrongdoing; Law and economics; Law; Unjust enrichment; Duty; Doctrine; Contract theory; Simplicity; Simple (philosophy); Political science; Economics; Restitution; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012408276543079546,"score_gpt":0.2764690607138822,"score_spread":0.2640607841708027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264785532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03561059,0.07124513,0.09480121,0.12652357,0.0028479213,0.0002042406,0.00016158224,0.00008052401,0.6685252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9089242,0.020410359,0.01954327,0.015371284,0.0029962047,0.00048988353,0.00009069291,0.00009558912,0.032078505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664446,0.016223457,0.0017584414,0.0026864184,0.010588287,0.0022987328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754803,0.015525046,0.002468038,0.0027296601,0.00252998,0.0012670103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017704269,0.0009829983,0.0011579666,0.0049513206,0.007472488,0.012971772,0.0032679788,0.014854582,0.0041867686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02357337,0.0006609783,0.0013505323,0.004665078,0.11379179,0.019671392,0.0069090542,0.0129310405,0.0006943462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018294745,0.0000036715799,0.000040110153,0.000011386978,0.0000016477954,0.000024073997,0.0003082968,0.00010617905,0.000007066823,0.998329,0.00039465414,0.00077219546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040344103,0.0000074093423,0.0000834445,0.00009338339,0.0000025776849,0.00007108069,0.00024498912,0.00028114085,0.000013554995,0.9874736,0.011715571,0.00000924365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007002244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002321999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017704269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016008336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085653495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11614913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264824941","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Law and Non-Economic Interests","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.010751328188536278,"score_gpt":0.2949136895448647,"score_spread":0.2841623613563284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264824941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069218636,0.006427367,0.019815765,0.04160072,0.00035208705,0.00006837226,0.00004145374,0.000027353508,0.86244816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424782,0.0017377154,0.0029164075,0.010592978,0.00017451365,0.000071616705,0.000024168254,0.000014885853,0.041989602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906685,0.002449929,0.00027475454,0.0006797105,0.0039607463,0.0019663188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943382,0.0031562347,0.00062566507,0.0005366323,0.0009653879,0.00037800032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006764181,0.00033486707,0.00047681233,0.002172243,0.0065961303,0.008944733,0.0021426508,0.0061983187,0.002600918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012652344,0.00043429897,0.00070279907,0.0013475067,0.041113116,0.0044975257,0.006790347,0.0069482257,0.00040681116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.5168247e-7,0.0000032406879,0.000112007685,0.0000061806772,9.326881e-7,0.00005301748,0.0014021813,0.000049446295,0.000018643252,0.9967265,0.00040100497,0.0012259119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017047003,0.000028728613,0.0034539134,0.00034257976,0.000013833669,0.00030918792,0.0029803598,0.0006520475,0.00048729143,0.85198945,0.13967328,0.000052305742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08741448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12265547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08741448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130620785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011743167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17381132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265282365","doi":"","title":"Of Priors and of Disconnects: How 'Chicago' Premises Risk Distortion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Prior probability; Undoing; Proposition; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Psychology; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.01295997421133903,"score_gpt":0.2638875613829454,"score_spread":0.25092758717160635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265282365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051137853,0.004967019,0.15760551,0.15850866,0.0009843776,0.00007954065,0.00025463858,0.00019956453,0.6262629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660628,0.0010421075,0.009054333,0.0077373027,0.0007305466,0.00010085143,0.000051578594,0.00017150745,0.015049013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925849,0.0036768848,0.00020322666,0.0011436457,0.001799631,0.0005916515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98431116,0.011412067,0.00072293443,0.0018662212,0.001299208,0.00038845607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009210484,0.00044318236,0.00068076194,0.0014085504,0.004001209,0.010399737,0.002375149,0.0063400296,0.008986839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032679442,0.00060528365,0.00063257833,0.0009010732,0.035655376,0.018470695,0.005743111,0.012040114,0.00084736425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036715796,0.000001935835,0.000056091816,0.0000033312645,0.0000011803697,0.00001162454,0.0004991184,0.00008371273,0.000008504589,0.9974572,0.0009148926,0.0009587288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040216323,0.0000019528823,0.00007406858,0.000018558088,0.0000017340611,0.000018724772,0.00025737638,0.00030054356,0.000031214666,0.9910499,0.008237204,0.0000047058556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068167653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004371716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010399737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065599717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003141653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048710287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265365158","doi":"","title":"La Nature Juridique des Sûretés Réelles en Droit Civil et en Common Law: Une Question de Tradition Juridique? (Real Security within Civil Law and the Common Law: A Matter of Legal Traditions?)","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Political science; Common law; Comparative law; Private law; Unjust enrichment; Delict; Tort; Municipal law; Public law; Black letter law; Restitution; Liability","score_opus":0.005121735499528955,"score_gpt":0.2747953627260005,"score_spread":0.2696736272264716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265365158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12030776,0.062411655,0.035529,0.12166194,0.0013255154,0.000050767103,0.0003381314,0.00012617238,0.658249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89504504,0.011566874,0.006546403,0.0054975376,0.0020361785,0.00011454635,0.00010384395,0.00010210782,0.07898744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993731,0.0019125923,0.00025510107,0.0018701821,0.0015952745,0.00063579937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883333,0.00573741,0.0019299582,0.0013193103,0.0019597057,0.00072031555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090589365,0.00018925614,0.00075868407,0.0026461342,0.008421255,0.015747322,0.0017449511,0.0051322165,0.010031942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018132927,0.00060757133,0.00042416304,0.003666305,0.052481066,0.020534717,0.003397589,0.009786805,0.0014628272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052637483,0.0000049448627,0.00036197476,0.00001324771,0.0000025365644,0.000014219619,0.0027813609,0.000028606732,0.000036073223,0.99225944,0.00088976894,0.0036025404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002511266,0.0000328631,0.0081995595,0.00034341036,0.000011678785,0.00034292857,0.005702424,0.0003876315,0.0003449323,0.76086,0.22368367,0.000065807006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03309131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035067372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03309131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011106087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073197214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08058071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266123483","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents: The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Terminology; Adversarial system; Scope (computer science); Political science; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.01563111275027229,"score_gpt":0.3273762575354393,"score_spread":0.311745144785167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266123483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038029386,0.06376588,0.002999263,0.028953109,0.0057367873,0.000114941635,0.001666385,0.00018978308,0.8927709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09348689,0.15798229,0.006607903,0.012277817,0.011097656,0.00028327317,0.0033396904,0.00058742886,0.714337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959916,0.000121004785,0.000019919395,0.000054868447,0.00015494661,0.00005022849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879164,0.0007743959,0.000063161606,0.00006429768,0.0002130119,0.0000935399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044472617,0.00039663096,0.0005375197,0.0023344052,0.002306469,0.00824691,0.0007811122,0.0013711445,0.061137035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015152538,0.0003036819,0.00039330346,0.0066762636,0.0020901165,0.004313918,0.00150352,0.0025298453,0.012345917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003720795,0.000055968794,0.00089185545,0.0006249218,0.000008021117,0.000089976755,0.0034513304,0.0005653419,0.00035487133,0.27656883,0.64064723,0.07670444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036816095,0.0000145832555,0.0019011184,0.00070010545,0.000004852,0.00013374406,0.0014215945,0.00018995526,0.000082743565,0.023877883,0.9716607,0.000009066433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045314142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060915574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061137035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025788466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015620928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20452374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266637586","doi":"","title":"Substantive legitimate expectations: The Singapore reception","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Academy of Law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Project commissioning; Relation (database); Publishing; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.05252654725299365,"score_gpt":0.36045225419247956,"score_spread":0.3079257069394859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266637586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109264165,0.014368493,0.0033271415,0.27246127,0.0018079835,0.00003702591,0.00025574485,0.000059518567,0.5984186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257939,0.0034615735,0.00055019767,0.021083456,0.0002876435,0.00002530967,0.000082096296,0.000036720845,0.048679188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483216,0.0023010669,0.00030492444,0.0004763354,0.0015263673,0.00055912335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622524,0.001524502,0.00042880996,0.00026965883,0.0010928904,0.0004587817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072393306,0.0002635374,0.00036915793,0.00071247894,0.00519879,0.007948714,0.00071908644,0.0034867513,0.0045457925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008743636,0.00025788246,0.0003503903,0.0012289968,0.012625477,0.0057045138,0.0049387445,0.007399042,0.00088981877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034224726,0.000009022214,0.0013667798,0.00011297031,0.0000070459196,0.0008792806,0.03105117,0.00012590064,0.00035863218,0.9188304,0.0268773,0.020347286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020247131,0.0001234359,0.009377795,0.000706015,0.000021786107,0.0007021644,0.021854416,0.0008619363,0.0015640267,0.14602035,0.81864244,0.00010533551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05063895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11120439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05063895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012576076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014391025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1006884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267158788","doi":"","title":"The [Fiduciary] Duty of Fidelity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Fidelity; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Restitution; Discretion; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.019014594328360907,"score_gpt":0.2989873036870136,"score_spread":0.2799727093586527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267158788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024646148,0.005387494,0.06522425,0.062016096,0.0012447061,0.000122187,0.0002087159,0.00011941836,0.841031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9016638,0.0018468808,0.017084526,0.017695872,0.0012180704,0.000260018,0.00009273181,0.00008142954,0.060056776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842747,0.006017203,0.0008846103,0.0024788,0.004495181,0.0018494817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877851,0.0062798182,0.001126122,0.0026767417,0.001666168,0.00046603908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113133965,0.0004401523,0.00058214355,0.0013354453,0.007229368,0.007907235,0.0020824624,0.00933875,0.0054597044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03733038,0.0005229012,0.0006328627,0.000970123,0.0403072,0.0076494603,0.0058225896,0.00814175,0.0011893542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016245727,0.000002023206,0.00006108135,0.000005842728,9.667907e-7,0.000014013276,0.0005245506,0.000031659583,0.000028615586,0.9956145,0.0016239068,0.0020911468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013802611,0.000038966245,0.0008542342,0.00020603668,0.000009743708,0.00030362836,0.00078008155,0.00044767806,0.00036291537,0.7761746,0.22076736,0.000040860657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01063594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007125314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113133965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004913937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048374673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05983168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267271697","doi":"","title":"Business trust in Singapore.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.025722524703996604,"score_gpt":0.24267488172529844,"score_spread":0.21695235702130183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267271697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063309427,0.010916753,0.00069151196,0.023140358,0.0009630542,0.000054045708,0.000783798,0.00014214223,0.9569775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08387219,0.0057013193,0.00061849534,0.0038543227,0.00025305775,0.0000881204,0.0007034122,0.000079829646,0.90482926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860317,0.0003108793,0.00016629302,0.00017094816,0.00051042653,0.00023827532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773645,0.00025361942,0.0003531269,0.00021156488,0.00074840995,0.00069683016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010601771,0.0003514145,0.00026664,0.0006898972,0.0021121607,0.0059387237,0.00044489087,0.0028590318,0.07922817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003094254,0.00022900332,0.00021181669,0.0016772266,0.0010608238,0.0036245943,0.0023752735,0.0019593402,0.026688056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032054046,0.000025920457,0.0028412805,0.00028280675,0.000008296219,0.001102651,0.002990107,0.00014442799,0.00024695206,0.3742109,0.49676123,0.12135332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027235712,0.000012561639,0.002097061,0.00008615932,0.0000023649623,0.00033886393,0.0005428049,0.00007693396,0.00006604313,0.0033089675,0.99345994,0.0000055913692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02538206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042709067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07922817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042352984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005974233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26504463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267455731","doi":"","title":"Care For Life: Private Care Agreements Between Older Adults and Friends or Family Members","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Phenomenon; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Interpersonal relationship; Unintended consequences; Nursing; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.010444063660800938,"score_gpt":0.2907399214588565,"score_spread":0.2802958577980556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267455731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07361187,0.0048954645,0.06926658,0.12044441,0.0013627717,0.00053068326,0.00027797744,0.00034243203,0.7292678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91260433,0.0011047908,0.011613802,0.020986442,0.0007821573,0.00053296774,0.0000786018,0.000057508063,0.05223934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98652446,0.006948855,0.0009426862,0.0011937371,0.0025218881,0.0018683798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98638946,0.007445295,0.0019997638,0.0023810873,0.0010872454,0.0006971146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109349135,0.0003230639,0.00064873794,0.00061819085,0.0112772025,0.0061849034,0.0018520453,0.015171127,0.0073593576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02043576,0.00065530214,0.00063862454,0.00083591306,0.025765479,0.010410495,0.008097751,0.00770605,0.0012611173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008337975,0.000034444252,0.0003708243,0.00002633242,0.000004584446,0.00019292136,0.005063176,0.00007941714,0.00012773341,0.9816488,0.006782244,0.005661229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063370346,0.00013748057,0.0023653521,0.0003297797,0.000021169319,0.0012915874,0.008537946,0.0010283188,0.0005872201,0.67762893,0.30792516,0.00008366306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010292662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013044674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015171127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003534561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008618468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057830095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267556988","doi":"","title":"RESHAPING THE DUTIES OF DIRECTORS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of care; Business judgment rule; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Insolvency; Law; Business; Corporation; Creditor; Supreme court; Corporate law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Accounting; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.017349823338290084,"score_gpt":0.30437694734372606,"score_spread":0.28702712400543595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267556988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07273169,0.0036163593,0.009169527,0.109736,0.0023420716,0.00022910412,0.00020987076,0.00018779459,0.8017776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74275947,0.0013030004,0.0035731194,0.06828503,0.00078328897,0.00009981231,0.00006893631,0.00006835327,0.18305908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98712975,0.0015482887,0.00036705408,0.0017852825,0.0046661794,0.0045034396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993622,0.001908824,0.00032721032,0.0008053159,0.0022081549,0.0011285424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00798351,0.0006202804,0.00053048955,0.0014378369,0.0134149,0.008507437,0.0025609767,0.008655074,0.004305886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016694086,0.00060858094,0.00059269695,0.0008077548,0.019423071,0.0038429436,0.005148081,0.008748866,0.0009700597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020132404,0.000018482338,0.0010483648,0.000025180796,0.000006914445,0.00036195587,0.006656711,0.00020272617,0.0006610835,0.93425363,0.042452157,0.014292695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090610505,0.0000775401,0.006436545,0.00024976145,0.000061588085,0.00039715655,0.0056907414,0.001000102,0.002477443,0.13398327,0.84940207,0.00013321081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6601372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72051835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6601372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03146078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05631732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6837287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268124680","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.004","title":"The civil law trust: a modality of ownership or an interlude in ownership?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Business; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Commercial law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06128180043822352,"score_gpt":0.26842321185353396,"score_spread":0.20714141141531045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268124680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014622483,0.010245005,0.008829526,0.03052054,0.00030837004,0.000022917831,0.00007308933,0.00005261521,0.9353255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294446,0.0054490063,0.0015870024,0.0033241534,0.00023556089,0.00004132147,0.00003972831,0.000049685597,0.15982899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980482,0.00069928437,0.00003107108,0.00015758173,0.00057519093,0.0004887211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987538,0.00045003637,0.0000977303,0.00021344998,0.00029149733,0.00019350508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014729882,0.00036603396,0.00039050594,0.00085971446,0.0046448917,0.009693291,0.0009924581,0.0021779528,0.006319309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030975097,0.0002535704,0.00027838693,0.0015276414,0.042853184,0.007417752,0.0027173143,0.0035008858,0.0007713744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019129413,0.0000020320108,0.000067077664,0.000008771755,8.6333034e-7,0.000022955834,0.0024146542,0.00003430108,0.000025017687,0.9907342,0.0031672406,0.0035210194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077743225,0.000012922533,0.0012439728,0.0003769433,0.000008103018,0.00013950774,0.007646373,0.000675251,0.00020759074,0.7013774,0.28828204,0.000022160166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3192718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.347489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3192718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025338536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016661406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6348269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268216550","doi":"","title":"Advice to Vice-Regal Officers by Crown Law Officers and Others","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Legal advice; Vice president; Officer; Politics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.013530389191897916,"score_gpt":0.29132569120510227,"score_spread":0.27779530201320435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268216550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07129046,0.0045969607,0.009011635,0.23885892,0.0036577717,0.00033191807,0.00030575803,0.00076923147,0.6711773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41418123,0.003398329,0.007510558,0.049305663,0.0015058093,0.00012232775,0.00020818101,0.00035012633,0.5234178],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952909,0.0019781075,0.0002267349,0.00033945817,0.0007752988,0.0013895638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98363596,0.005172311,0.0019909302,0.0013078186,0.00328959,0.0046033375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006814864,0.0004428086,0.00033352638,0.0010572759,0.0072491006,0.00264453,0.0010350641,0.004607737,0.042302795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02736782,0.00037621733,0.00024660854,0.0008729067,0.002075016,0.002635336,0.0027492023,0.004282261,0.015118774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090664515,0.0001588322,0.010551149,0.00024486703,0.000015983851,0.0013518194,0.028453266,0.00022208455,0.0018126047,0.080089524,0.7326318,0.1443774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016051594,0.00003296153,0.0046354034,0.00017887757,0.0000066207776,0.00034707753,0.006813602,0.00016887918,0.0003517285,0.0053870734,0.9820341,0.000027710581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028897075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07343681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042302795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024600483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008725359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14151692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268306630","doi":"","title":"The So-Called Purposive Construction of Patent Claims: Comments on Whirlpool and Free World Trust","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Object (grammar); Law; Original meaning; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.016743512287951005,"score_gpt":0.27350084137592856,"score_spread":0.25675732908797755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268306630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010067055,0.0025770613,0.000532777,0.98407906,0.0033644536,0.000018962113,0.00003347068,0.00001574607,0.008371789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04535418,0.0055816965,0.0014080488,0.92152613,0.010012013,0.00019005731,0.000038887018,0.00012538597,0.015763685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96159726,0.017926987,0.002992428,0.0033487182,0.010813248,0.0033212595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86420536,0.119598106,0.0030756127,0.0015744262,0.009893319,0.001653133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035903186,0.0011828453,0.0015925696,0.0027519607,0.018656472,0.013822763,0.007230107,0.058482584,0.0040332573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11693617,0.0011764606,0.0017411304,0.0040937094,0.038126513,0.021113688,0.006768052,0.040604163,0.0014912623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044736247,0.000015204465,0.00020870255,0.00014083849,0.000013668972,0.0009925707,0.018997457,0.00017805997,0.00011592098,0.24431086,0.7301145,0.0048674154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051083953,0.000038247344,0.0008129525,0.0015289398,0.000034499924,0.00041145188,0.024971783,0.00063284795,0.00051851134,0.11357835,0.85715646,0.00026487262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13214397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13770536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13214397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020427419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017252678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2627496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268360709","doi":"","title":"Suppliers’ Duties to Report Product-Related Accidents under the New 'Australian Consumer Law': A Comparative Critique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Business; Product (mathematics); Confidentiality; European union; Consumer protection; Law; Political science; International trade; Commerce","score_opus":0.024489280811397063,"score_gpt":0.361172408279085,"score_spread":0.3366831274676879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268360709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08686613,0.022811748,0.013120642,0.32430354,0.0029334156,0.00014019925,0.00022098892,0.00011312005,0.5494902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8089459,0.020088656,0.006353668,0.08747572,0.0029570581,0.00025078323,0.00017574335,0.0001294815,0.07362302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94279116,0.016909406,0.0030638112,0.0036844988,0.031288672,0.0022624556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94366086,0.026692491,0.0037593946,0.0037096054,0.02119429,0.0009833553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036504716,0.0004220725,0.00058480795,0.0038143706,0.007470367,0.012620194,0.0041214116,0.0112314895,0.0037312647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048786297,0.0012956742,0.0009857616,0.0043003373,0.0224165,0.010884639,0.006877336,0.011584682,0.0006141918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030236031,0.000047924666,0.0018128311,0.0004700581,0.000021508611,0.0004600415,0.057890095,0.0003209063,0.00044034154,0.88621694,0.023680514,0.028608548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003623967,0.0002007145,0.027227998,0.0018673864,0.000095403455,0.0006590316,0.02709441,0.0011613462,0.00081782206,0.08267465,0.85794413,0.00022086554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13723645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087970465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13723645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019301573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021267185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2728753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268451974","doi":"","title":"A Charter Free Domain: In Defense of Dolphin Delivery","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Common law; Legitimacy; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.007708372918076731,"score_gpt":0.24931509330282994,"score_spread":0.24160672038475323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268451974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061845545,0.0027487807,0.055256214,0.12880795,0.00088826293,0.00048363933,0.00023827744,0.00016889391,0.74956244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882331,0.0010374868,0.011284423,0.019137196,0.00035050648,0.00025343613,0.000088051245,0.00008154219,0.07953429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97789156,0.006911593,0.00066155044,0.003373497,0.007784283,0.0033774178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842302,0.006687784,0.0010065677,0.0025281168,0.004447267,0.0011000653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020274779,0.0003962814,0.00060527155,0.0019315493,0.011343394,0.012050697,0.00339037,0.008655583,0.006407785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046216846,0.0004886846,0.00056942384,0.0016137287,0.038197976,0.008557865,0.008047145,0.010035528,0.00071376405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000924448,0.000004074569,0.0002033268,0.000009901511,0.0000022718093,0.0000686657,0.0016687344,0.00017439161,0.0000635954,0.9914444,0.0027082227,0.0036432713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009150028,0.00006272293,0.0022167559,0.0004282947,0.000039374016,0.00022442696,0.0055610184,0.0029723789,0.0014393512,0.5524153,0.43444008,0.00010873868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47619396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35954902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47619396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03562278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07873348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9468444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268481372","doi":"10.21991/c9238n","title":"The Bilateral Amending Formula as a Mechanism for the Entrenchment of Property Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitution; Legislature; Property rights; Law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021187758004127085,"score_gpt":0.28794909136173163,"score_spread":0.26676133335760455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268481372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01733537,0.0014695337,0.12381133,0.02653649,0.0010307871,0.00045798105,0.00012529954,0.00036619828,0.82886696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6932415,0.0014049836,0.12511158,0.00880606,0.0008450246,0.0007921675,0.000113390495,0.00019042578,0.1694949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850846,0.0047442596,0.0006847274,0.0019037798,0.0061379913,0.0014446154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919607,0.003724296,0.000634007,0.0019569853,0.0014071662,0.00031680887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015793044,0.00054119807,0.00048333875,0.0019523379,0.0061006662,0.005800236,0.0025478508,0.007537689,0.01266018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030242976,0.00080176763,0.0007385771,0.0019687142,0.020942086,0.0090049645,0.005204048,0.009673874,0.001188589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022988652,0.0000034239827,0.000036012774,0.0000053702415,7.2099044e-7,0.000013497284,0.0001796464,0.00007567173,0.000057608926,0.9962888,0.00088964374,0.002447267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077846744,0.00004637938,0.00053854386,0.00013120758,0.000018086786,0.0001390951,0.00023011248,0.0027096106,0.0007289876,0.8142865,0.1810473,0.000046359746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051373016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09375846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051373016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013961658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018691398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10214794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268611194","doi":"","title":"Deterrence, Prophylaxis and Punishment in Fiduciary Obligations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Prudence; Law and economics; Profit (economics); Wrongdoing; Function (biology); Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01134652939564317,"score_gpt":0.2805975674775995,"score_spread":0.26925103808195633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268611194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23543765,0.006947997,0.23632862,0.034820486,0.00047525653,0.00019586,0.000056161356,0.000106819534,0.48563117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98336524,0.0007176885,0.008475063,0.0010631119,0.0001656855,0.000103646365,0.00000906592,0.000015889984,0.006084595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898845,0.0048315628,0.00045769775,0.0009701792,0.0029625755,0.00089337345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98929065,0.006148693,0.0015998576,0.0016516944,0.0009017274,0.0004074277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008438307,0.0003965752,0.0006256048,0.0013492992,0.0032662833,0.0061185053,0.0014274748,0.004526431,0.0019494467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021501726,0.00044473636,0.0005435619,0.0006545082,0.028795986,0.0067706523,0.0046854303,0.0045353435,0.000343418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020377488,0.0000042954775,0.00011497744,0.000004853022,8.142266e-7,0.0000123006175,0.00014595865,0.00016545276,0.000025996389,0.9979684,0.000091094225,0.0014638569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009737602,0.000013667835,0.0002670389,0.00002844636,0.0000031207896,0.00005403414,0.00011721939,0.0010969901,0.00014864966,0.9934308,0.004821854,0.000008475891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026862998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021933967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008438307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003814882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033763654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044626534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268936173","doi":"","title":"Demystifying Juristic Reasons","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Mistake; Obligation; Plaintiff; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Law and economics; Restitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.08187277001745748,"score_gpt":0.3476645180210045,"score_spread":0.26579174800354705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268936173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023204917,0.004819233,0.032509446,0.072475664,0.0012180577,0.000120195175,0.0001208675,0.00011256466,0.86541903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181955,0.0015125069,0.015536428,0.016963692,0.00045998386,0.00011960047,0.000091174865,0.00011947485,0.047001783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822289,0.004368401,0.00069821527,0.0024429902,0.006933717,0.0033277823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869539,0.0050015,0.00072704005,0.001591162,0.0048068142,0.0009196293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01903501,0.00076461176,0.0007869989,0.0038503017,0.017171638,0.016459588,0.0033347812,0.008793548,0.0042162607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02061707,0.00059789984,0.0009059579,0.002137421,0.08177619,0.011152251,0.011185186,0.013329349,0.0004814044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.440179e-7,0.0000013270576,0.0000637884,0.0000037548918,0.0000011880646,0.00002125697,0.0015820526,0.00002202302,0.000027690785,0.9968509,0.0006287973,0.00079626846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017288234,0.000010085041,0.0007456931,0.00014742668,0.00002262656,0.00009329741,0.0056410288,0.00041839242,0.00039155807,0.77269906,0.21977817,0.000035368572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2753112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35494095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2753112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03827657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060863502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5474174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269380789","doi":"","title":"Should the Notion of a Right of Ownership Bearing on Incorporeal Property Meet with Disapproval? Reflections Upon the Ownership of Claims (Faut-il Condamner La Propriété Des Biens Incorporels? Réflexions Autour de La Propriété Des Créances)","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04623034687795371,"score_gpt":0.3213980498036467,"score_spread":0.27516770292569304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269380789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044412706,0.013455825,0.044088595,0.16696942,0.0016416915,0.00004563702,0.00009212569,0.00006149073,0.7292325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486884,0.0036376042,0.0032602358,0.009510516,0.001383291,0.0000944658,0.000043033757,0.000099628014,0.033282828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98648155,0.006259843,0.0005143621,0.0020871386,0.0028579992,0.0017991265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921633,0.0038653093,0.00084295747,0.0017049676,0.0010189431,0.00040446696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013780497,0.00040775636,0.0009285707,0.0014374501,0.007047303,0.020302603,0.0029508208,0.009770787,0.006750109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01667506,0.00065274996,0.0011076075,0.0012656889,0.09987493,0.032406997,0.008013757,0.011731651,0.0012583421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002492921,0.000002164157,0.00003463477,0.000005637302,0.0000011617465,0.000020558973,0.0011398447,0.00002174629,0.000020593588,0.99777514,0.00041214522,0.00056389417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000804694,0.000013170948,0.000247547,0.0001332532,0.0000050064273,0.000081609534,0.002476972,0.00022520503,0.00012839863,0.9446888,0.05197826,0.00001370526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066349343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042316015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020302603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006478704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037336922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072879076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269438008","doi":"","title":"The 'Fraud-on-the-Market' Theory for Securities Litigation Arrives in Canada: Two Steps Forward and One Back?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Misrepresentation; Securities fraud; Plaintiff; Business; Class action; Supreme court; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Actuarial science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015734056614615893,"score_gpt":0.2524480129128991,"score_spread":0.2367139562982832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269438008","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016565327,0.014967624,0.004667799,0.7903956,0.0023645181,0.00010461695,0.00034587135,0.00008519806,0.17050345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5471736,0.02574886,0.0072393375,0.2912768,0.0022043095,0.00013003818,0.00039732154,0.00020540925,0.12562422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857103,0.0014174941,0.00043159619,0.0013232512,0.006502118,0.004615282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907843,0.0018726494,0.00061701704,0.00041592156,0.004096791,0.002213376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006667753,0.0008715434,0.0010503058,0.0030067204,0.028303556,0.022294302,0.0057249134,0.023378266,0.012123801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025308786,0.0010056588,0.001568539,0.0051548597,0.026345182,0.016837066,0.0059839995,0.025042977,0.0012456338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029331673,0.000035750185,0.0021358926,0.000088482644,0.00001959722,0.0005214162,0.0061773495,0.00037822162,0.00011567055,0.89848894,0.072594695,0.01941467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013741587,0.00005798684,0.008927248,0.00096035964,0.00011435183,0.00057577825,0.017897421,0.002970399,0.0005598324,0.36739084,0.60008526,0.0003231108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24345793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24345793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36919987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8774816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269531635","doi":"","title":"Sovereignty's Promise -- 'Introduction: The State as Fiduciary and the Rule of Law'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Statute; Law; Obligation; Political science; Sovereignty; Private law; State (computer science); Public law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.014304158657667824,"score_gpt":0.25985795527504224,"score_spread":0.24555379661737442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269531635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005691239,0.14594445,0.013614738,0.11344084,0.011372123,0.000068208035,0.00044213037,0.000107137996,0.7093192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27915928,0.15408319,0.008857886,0.03412342,0.024485579,0.00025931024,0.0009274079,0.00033386747,0.4977701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992524,0.00030873177,0.000020062726,0.0001164269,0.0002117827,0.00009061839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929035,0.00051855936,0.00003597029,0.00004026588,0.000072279654,0.000042497133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086135813,0.0005117686,0.00042422995,0.0006948817,0.0019306798,0.004263659,0.00073758705,0.0028805044,0.0122083975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017505025,0.0003075369,0.0003902836,0.0011052164,0.0061761057,0.0045944303,0.0016832054,0.00633936,0.0024872534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074818313,0.000013745508,0.00009305462,0.00007923267,0.000002039235,0.0000360173,0.0017237886,0.00014687359,0.00011363482,0.878015,0.10643366,0.013335539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032013925,0.000022208487,0.00036440798,0.00040123722,0.0000026593605,0.00008068739,0.0006808703,0.00019008949,0.00009776068,0.22274317,0.7754039,0.000009826717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031462396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039401334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122083975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026253937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018216157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040841162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269778463","doi":"","title":"R. v. Ha: Upholding General Warrants Without Asking the Right Questions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Parliament; Statute; Law; Political science; Warrant; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.012866973350300234,"score_gpt":0.3121257233692345,"score_spread":0.29925875001893426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269778463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026034122,0.004056865,0.009129853,0.17139037,0.002256003,0.00052832253,0.0014448074,0.0010471176,0.7841126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38751504,0.0033392468,0.01253609,0.33769262,0.0026266275,0.00064779085,0.0007001912,0.00030766882,0.25463477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97958004,0.002322493,0.0016015546,0.002139337,0.009350149,0.005006455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98429686,0.008020123,0.0008587068,0.0012714408,0.0046426714,0.0009101789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011885625,0.0008300885,0.00085486355,0.0010994398,0.0057568178,0.006682692,0.005118467,0.033271026,0.009441555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02859969,0.0014048604,0.0014325673,0.0010644925,0.0069598462,0.005517876,0.0026765997,0.012617093,0.005876785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074066505,0.00004887035,0.0015935339,0.00022809955,0.000030849966,0.0010202888,0.0028551533,0.0003126693,0.0020440775,0.7020815,0.27411675,0.01559417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015286134,0.00019296726,0.0060851374,0.00046807603,0.0001686733,0.001244635,0.0016509,0.00090628135,0.0027177746,0.08163526,0.9044721,0.00030544042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36854658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5107198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36854658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0131343985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027363392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73280275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269976336","doi":"","title":"The development of Charter damages jurisprudence in Canada : guidelines from the Supreme Court","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Punitive damages; Jurisprudence; Political science; Charter; Commonwealth","score_opus":0.07312488672695615,"score_gpt":0.3517869886197988,"score_spread":0.27866210189284263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269976336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023096005,0.073374435,0.042191613,0.4568428,0.0042502964,0.0015154314,0.0019580612,0.0005759155,0.39619544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5885137,0.059678823,0.1147243,0.11593514,0.0014934589,0.00090896373,0.0014207151,0.000601987,0.11672287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9601664,0.005373659,0.0027258103,0.0027042045,0.02339333,0.0056365593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454877,0.012756099,0.001351004,0.0013476016,0.03501248,0.0040451055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030582277,0.0012377129,0.001425218,0.007821697,0.028984925,0.02985656,0.008807736,0.016627753,0.002796296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05886634,0.0019955784,0.0012757119,0.008230238,0.02192958,0.005496029,0.0053574285,0.021060595,0.0005101395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013082347,0.000043571115,0.0011567504,0.00018424407,0.000015811098,0.00034469875,0.0064961035,0.00215758,0.0003702076,0.8776522,0.07979514,0.03177065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006208491,0.000043108597,0.006782756,0.0028862956,0.00007974779,0.00016320047,0.007858686,0.005380436,0.0011821201,0.13238375,0.8427226,0.00045520882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99383897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99653375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6929392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.30706078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5864119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8037113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270277363","doi":"","title":"The Valuation of Chances","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Tort; Causation; Valuation (finance); Commonwealth; Actuarial science; Certainty; Economics; Law and economics; English law; Law; Political science; Liability; Accounting; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03821480883393581,"score_gpt":0.31714432908490414,"score_spread":0.27892952025096834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270277363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036620602,0.0082871225,0.14680858,0.024459127,0.000948609,0.00021908517,0.0005283723,0.00009515831,0.7820333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93896645,0.004335174,0.014502221,0.00096893957,0.0011610436,0.00030259974,0.00017750336,0.000080519654,0.03950545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906928,0.00474293,0.0004347701,0.000983791,0.0022967819,0.00084896205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251003,0.010592179,0.0013998741,0.0022819727,0.0017991564,0.0014168092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010874237,0.0011835329,0.0011644085,0.0032149693,0.0030172952,0.0144091,0.0018371764,0.003924911,0.019818882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035966337,0.0005694844,0.001062192,0.0018543926,0.01792608,0.018270075,0.006125196,0.004187496,0.0017316386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013806732,0.0000043361897,0.000254736,0.000019398736,0.000011016865,0.000050723993,0.00015844878,0.0007045151,0.000044463683,0.9941095,0.00079586485,0.0038331465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006188164,0.000017779006,0.00018531435,0.000058963837,0.00001089586,0.00009712078,0.00018246792,0.0010437957,0.0000665421,0.9868938,0.011427332,0.000009859223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094751123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009891753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019818882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048625832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022316372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06630075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270302900","doi":"10.21991/c9dm2n","title":"R. V. HEYWOOD: OVERBREADTH IN THE LAW OR IN THE JUDGMENT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09085970743381327,"score_gpt":0.3195633263976049,"score_spread":0.2287036189637916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270302900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007282409,0.021458419,0.003323693,0.7431353,0.007018411,0.00006119267,0.00012992273,0.00010587534,0.21748486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16995114,0.007965496,0.0031739776,0.69655657,0.00421346,0.00018203343,0.000085407875,0.0001744432,0.117697485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846554,0.0060814526,0.0008277174,0.0016459462,0.003907849,0.0028816622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97968125,0.014320257,0.0009293032,0.0009134175,0.002881716,0.0012740879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020251194,0.00089021743,0.001472702,0.0014072433,0.011835858,0.012206534,0.0040320414,0.043405894,0.009021784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04728957,0.0011161552,0.0010823465,0.0015731339,0.016249608,0.014805064,0.0041269013,0.03338837,0.003690943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061437575,0.0000431728,0.0002510228,0.00006192581,0.000014217762,0.0002074349,0.0028952416,0.00008947738,0.00026948826,0.7046609,0.2803792,0.011066583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012583053,0.000070743976,0.0012237746,0.0009562668,0.000051801442,0.00021163761,0.0045058015,0.00038636746,0.0009539228,0.4635844,0.5277481,0.00018130416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05603979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10287167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05603979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074042124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017135533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11142719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270901736","doi":"","title":"Canada's Unique Approach to Public/Private Divide and the Perils of Reform Via a Court Challenge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Equity (law); Payment; Government (linguistics); Health care; Typology; Public economics; Business; Public administration; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.011715355506210955,"score_gpt":0.24488666227283662,"score_spread":0.23317130676662567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270901736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039911527,0.006963238,0.0071547716,0.69113046,0.0012032727,0.000111803,0.00030977724,0.000096343916,0.25311884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83897656,0.003054758,0.0036488632,0.11489061,0.00083853287,0.00013183906,0.00009288554,0.00006819984,0.03829775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712702,0.005210543,0.00055841956,0.0031086213,0.0111815,0.008670719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97354287,0.011350498,0.0012728919,0.0014354251,0.006264704,0.006133695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013891232,0.00047686917,0.0009478999,0.0027155718,0.0286448,0.023695426,0.002489055,0.016630093,0.0061397883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031077413,0.00058204425,0.00097071193,0.0036551198,0.03320874,0.0065376763,0.006270562,0.015646,0.00035206502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018181323,0.0000140743,0.0010448864,0.000035743993,0.000015303905,0.0001440594,0.002125443,0.00028965794,0.000083336316,0.97025776,0.019851971,0.006119519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018183394,0.00007506375,0.013809735,0.0006008131,0.00014205702,0.00027209983,0.010209878,0.0037165135,0.00046848832,0.4332794,0.5369643,0.0002797782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9585543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9677979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1403093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1403093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24494569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271034153","doi":"","title":"Canadian Contract Law, 1970-2010","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy of law; Private law; Common law; Political science; Commercial law; Comparative law; Public law; Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06243914955490726,"score_gpt":0.3439151957841798,"score_spread":0.2814760462292725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271034153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009771629,0.12935577,0.0007303284,0.027766984,0.0025765386,0.00017835548,0.017231531,0.00020054344,0.8121884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15004101,0.10603538,0.0019048695,0.01355397,0.0007424023,0.0002172829,0.006466326,0.00012824252,0.7209105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953768,0.00016043367,0.00013415144,0.00037158912,0.003335379,0.00062162295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951402,0.00034681003,0.00016898318,0.00012025782,0.0037735952,0.00045013134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001665679,0.0006913557,0.00031658265,0.006984035,0.007510425,0.0049018436,0.0015167998,0.0024414014,0.01598966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00992199,0.00045511586,0.00035630784,0.011214927,0.0027380083,0.002208105,0.0011430521,0.0021287105,0.0028151646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004299853,0.000024185934,0.0020792475,0.00049116334,0.000013272734,0.0002446009,0.0025444636,0.00042378882,0.00019023477,0.19503602,0.72465473,0.074255295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029641621,0.000002612857,0.0042478824,0.00013158108,0.0000055987243,0.000040313083,0.0002770724,0.000037690017,0.0000520919,0.0007626278,0.99443,0.0000096202475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99077094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99539965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16088146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16088146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19548513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97325855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271256261","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139031288.022","title":"Property","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04031531985228431,"score_gpt":0.23144337021976472,"score_spread":0.1911280503674804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271256261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005234896,0.0005209298,0.004380963,0.0017155808,0.0006744188,0.00012174139,0.0030173643,0.0007868135,0.9882586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010822616,0.0010961337,0.002325341,0.0014030919,0.00040626788,0.00019361143,0.004892924,0.00096361066,0.97789633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976794,0.00027818966,0.00014731559,0.0004994061,0.0011433437,0.0002523321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629223,0.00063854485,0.0001721307,0.0010678511,0.0016460712,0.00018324335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002341482,0.0006352309,0.0006533113,0.0019716413,0.0025084526,0.005542535,0.001881105,0.0021884628,0.55155015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007874117,0.00036135502,0.0009294137,0.0023634352,0.0019109788,0.008035612,0.002213299,0.0023014892,0.3291043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042489475,0.00003673183,0.0002200794,0.00021912158,0.0000074970203,0.00015541885,0.00031704825,0.00008889879,0.0005380789,0.27378425,0.6528666,0.071723774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003948953,0.000008653277,0.00012963767,0.000056772995,0.000003441967,0.00011539343,0.000060468148,0.00003988286,0.00023366246,0.010747443,0.9885952,0.0000055000696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005613629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041362536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55155015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002437274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027147788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271712870","doi":"","title":"The danger lurking in apparently familiar words : common & civil law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Without Prejudice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Ancient history; History; Quarter (Canadian coin); Roman Empire; Mediterranean climate; Geography; Archaeology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021163380358148083,"score_gpt":0.32598759159244334,"score_spread":0.30482421123429526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271712870","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019367188,0.004065005,0.001964937,0.9549914,0.0065364363,0.00000747321,0.000063959094,0.000052826505,0.030381354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12335491,0.005464687,0.0033051397,0.7804446,0.028614186,0.00006934046,0.00009884464,0.00022665977,0.058421753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939778,0.0028904642,0.0002401521,0.0007771603,0.0017082958,0.0004060918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833023,0.010927335,0.0010892453,0.0013668857,0.002346281,0.00096799317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051456685,0.00044006584,0.0006625604,0.0010812959,0.0065664295,0.008410269,0.0017793687,0.015051025,0.013815796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031220669,0.0003508347,0.00034913293,0.0015809776,0.028128732,0.017979894,0.0042905565,0.028021649,0.0063581727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019836962,0.000011728222,0.00034043708,0.000045593755,0.0000066617004,0.00014712599,0.00451642,0.000045152312,0.0000985856,0.48996913,0.4962769,0.008522529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009893279,0.000014222157,0.00039140522,0.00021600047,0.0000042617016,0.0004657588,0.0077159232,0.00015144628,0.00013390629,0.38680044,0.60406,0.000036849662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005991208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007806491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015051025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019307183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030497597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046218395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271856803","doi":"","title":"The Rights of Private Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Public law; Comparative law; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Commercial law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008237456803218449,"score_gpt":0.28773733625692227,"score_spread":0.2794998794537038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271856803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029491499,0.0022170392,0.040245626,0.040443942,0.0003897736,0.00006274357,0.0001656913,0.000085740015,0.88689786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138603,0.0011584108,0.0054463493,0.0053059515,0.00072840496,0.00014715214,0.00011004509,0.0000655245,0.07317777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193406,0.002492643,0.00032757537,0.0016887998,0.0023962099,0.0011607289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917528,0.003321271,0.00062266795,0.0028146133,0.0009456491,0.0005429316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006283405,0.0003068846,0.00058836257,0.0010176547,0.0047601988,0.0116611915,0.0012532293,0.005015324,0.010105344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014852126,0.00037361644,0.0006059454,0.0008953443,0.023831971,0.0126566095,0.007935347,0.0059985383,0.0013723784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012064894,0.0000019472986,0.000034321554,0.0000031271043,9.201011e-7,0.0000064656033,0.00026308937,0.000027834441,0.0000305887,0.9978114,0.000546265,0.0012729252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006814639,0.0000055293044,0.00013445466,0.000032743632,0.0000036071604,0.000035525358,0.0002651219,0.00020424373,0.00012658775,0.943809,0.055371307,0.000005102873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036906658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022953409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116611915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033773012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004731009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033805728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272687555","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-18759-4_16","title":"Disgorgement of Profits in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Fiduciary; Discretion; Law; Principal (computer security); Common law; Unjust enrichment; Business; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Duty; Restitution; Economics","score_opus":0.09716062455108453,"score_gpt":0.3226159443959292,"score_spread":0.22545531984484468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272687555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051523376,0.010151443,0.0023080716,0.05301719,0.00090359186,0.00008171493,0.00059572345,0.0001401838,0.88127875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61804307,0.006114843,0.001729455,0.007765847,0.00022700033,0.000049870156,0.00023476538,0.00014467434,0.36569056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342054,0.00040864496,0.00010618764,0.00046630486,0.0029994277,0.0025988016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727696,0.00042181753,0.00008878231,0.00013718064,0.0014237632,0.0006515166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020620653,0.00039479608,0.0006174186,0.0024441134,0.015089514,0.013259462,0.00278247,0.0038846442,0.014040882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007834196,0.0004985829,0.00056575245,0.004855841,0.006439942,0.0026889916,0.003780354,0.005180047,0.00059529755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021131711,0.000021826138,0.0015506368,0.00004106773,0.000012236606,0.00012628741,0.0027974448,0.0006388973,0.000088431705,0.8920591,0.06763419,0.035008706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022374443,0.00002663307,0.012830074,0.00039701653,0.000041664567,0.00013132556,0.00931002,0.0019485636,0.00047836613,0.11344255,0.86127317,0.00009811631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1416272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1416272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25817743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99559075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272968454","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of the Executive - Principled Exasperation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Project commissioning; Statutory law; Law; Management; Publishing; Queen (butterfly); Judicial review; Political science; Operations research; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.030568537566160955,"score_gpt":0.3255545468062269,"score_spread":0.29498600924006596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272968454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03520915,0.046183333,0.02113976,0.3983864,0.012975949,0.0003126886,0.00040062037,0.000178867,0.48521328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7421599,0.018709723,0.009426234,0.1339035,0.0135085825,0.00027211642,0.00024087197,0.00015576518,0.0816234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565449,0.013324831,0.0037552363,0.005202295,0.015874133,0.005298675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9226211,0.044284154,0.003590999,0.0068739285,0.020731522,0.00189835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049568687,0.00035599375,0.0010305621,0.0019511386,0.00505459,0.0103956945,0.0029078615,0.016069274,0.003215813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13135494,0.00069497176,0.0006416524,0.0016355423,0.010620151,0.0048718587,0.0042131166,0.013990412,0.0010600409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000550377,0.000022418168,0.0010494952,0.0001634375,0.000047588976,0.0007661853,0.0018046313,0.0002690656,0.00038104944,0.8397284,0.12757492,0.028137678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000558162,0.00005691088,0.0026492903,0.00085668213,0.000100389945,0.00050830044,0.0009863873,0.0007980694,0.0014626605,0.36736324,0.62508804,0.00007423584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009896811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017262181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049568687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057895794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018536452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26214737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272988380","doi":"","title":"The Abrogation of the Rule Against Recovery in Mistake of Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Law; Restitution; Commonwealth; Statute; Political science; Repeal; Legislature; Commission; Common law","score_opus":0.010786189445508639,"score_gpt":0.2853970838873481,"score_spread":0.27461089444183945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272988380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07656487,0.0045749303,0.041150566,0.20456775,0.005606137,0.00036877874,0.000715476,0.00049155846,0.66596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7935181,0.0011224959,0.016609378,0.09868487,0.002383864,0.00036044203,0.00018264851,0.000169131,0.08696904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96001333,0.00801689,0.0038684474,0.008598582,0.013070505,0.006432203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97559625,0.012654794,0.0025200238,0.003716045,0.004223161,0.0012896297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024964435,0.00045173932,0.001388889,0.0012841431,0.009052274,0.009689075,0.003957929,0.02425917,0.0031830857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051318157,0.00093492074,0.0014395815,0.0007202564,0.028260926,0.005528051,0.006660711,0.02113235,0.002666919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035106983,0.000034232038,0.0008341499,0.00003426267,0.00001956226,0.00035969983,0.0024881146,0.00015711921,0.00074353494,0.96361405,0.024561951,0.0071182656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012507693,0.00034589134,0.004876926,0.00065204245,0.00010330805,0.0012009457,0.0017718006,0.0016838221,0.00430324,0.43263656,0.55196196,0.00033838296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037646458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03264784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037646458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005470382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015315032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13202614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273018940","doi":"","title":"The Economics of Fiduciary Accountability","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Opportunism; Proscription; Duty of loyalty; Accountability; Law and economics; Function (biology); Variety (cybernetics); Loyalty; Perspective (graphical); Duty; Economics; Liability; Business; Political science; Accounting; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012815026556827177,"score_gpt":0.3100432314357041,"score_spread":0.2972282048788769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273018940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052896284,0.013568054,0.070942424,0.08381033,0.00073781,0.00007457695,0.0002759425,0.00013739227,0.7775572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96161056,0.0035969836,0.0032954668,0.0035526827,0.0009385758,0.000104058294,0.000033785396,0.000041557574,0.026826236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99473464,0.0022355875,0.000113671806,0.0006045315,0.0015711999,0.0007403693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98897856,0.0067894654,0.001069612,0.001429287,0.0012372533,0.0004957986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064986334,0.00039947385,0.00058563147,0.0015613158,0.0030515913,0.0068261526,0.0011888812,0.005590598,0.0069327164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017269867,0.00038945753,0.00050440396,0.0010704609,0.015359217,0.0075896294,0.002561096,0.0040828353,0.0009605702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056147096,0.00000406467,0.00007007388,0.0000066421826,0.0000017601475,0.000011919418,0.00003283633,0.00038630943,0.000017054837,0.9965419,0.0011019693,0.0018198852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008727483,0.000008970924,0.00021394942,0.000037267047,0.000003444376,0.00003320716,0.000051712595,0.0010699906,0.000056551475,0.9867383,0.011770368,0.0000075007356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035797379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022162737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007209348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007209348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031877249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052307725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273439551","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Torts in the Nineties Edited by Nicholas J. Mullany","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisprudence; Law; Imprisonment; Political science; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.0073630420778782735,"score_gpt":0.3001173620472096,"score_spread":0.2927543199693313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273439551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001556035,0.91530794,0.00035902314,0.018709077,0.025270531,0.000026965976,0.0002764773,0.000052650652,0.03984175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017557552,0.81236583,0.0005939434,0.010231336,0.012560208,0.00005148624,0.00042323547,0.000059018123,0.16195914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942076,0.00010222326,0.000044474218,0.000079475314,0.00031350052,0.00003972112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840885,0.000674073,0.00012627906,0.00004194509,0.0006263802,0.00012245153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053803995,0.0011484923,0.00137999,0.0032792154,0.00092705194,0.0027251097,0.0010061465,0.001634086,0.042944673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003169567,0.00053412566,0.0006089299,0.0045972923,0.00093113055,0.0025253992,0.0010634308,0.0028889382,0.021588223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007451612,0.000008327935,0.000036160825,0.0003525555,0.0000047049466,0.000022569297,0.00004655668,0.000056419773,0.00004012652,0.0016619456,0.9558162,0.041946974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031570519,0.000006469133,0.0002813736,0.0008539309,0.000005137628,0.00013400005,0.000044261822,0.000014046691,0.000016029147,0.0009847378,0.99765176,0.0000050495564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008720238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020102857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042944673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019690823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036676636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14366424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227435901","doi":"","title":"CANADIAN CONTRACT AND TORT LAW: THE CONCEPT OF FORCE MAJEURE IN QUEBEC AND ITS COMMON LAW EQUIVALENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Tort; Civil law (Civil law); Doctrine; Law; Common law; Civil code; Political science; Frustration of purpose; Comparative law; Delict; Accident (philosophy); Exclusion clause; Private law; Public law; Philosophy; Liability; Black letter law; Business; Privity of contract; Contract management","score_opus":0.019285660534875043,"score_gpt":0.2765056945264532,"score_spread":0.2572200339915781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227435901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23538585,0.03063896,0.0141778495,0.06248027,0.0007781897,0.000122051104,0.0009559964,0.000057117093,0.65540373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796963,0.0025864274,0.0015684139,0.0009384274,0.000055067296,0.000027166236,0.00010218987,0.000008814473,0.015017202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997801,0.00045920335,0.000058013124,0.0002079292,0.0010312378,0.0004425331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735665,0.0007203972,0.0002869201,0.00009435138,0.0012656726,0.00027607367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015283048,0.00039623282,0.00027118798,0.0033423968,0.009239388,0.005736077,0.0013005703,0.0016675576,0.0064152605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004244168,0.00014555927,0.00028030074,0.0046754875,0.017890254,0.0024718554,0.0013871805,0.0015148282,0.0001933477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014402915,0.000008668704,0.002683898,0.000056661003,0.000005820847,0.00014311106,0.0138928825,0.00046560806,0.00016107065,0.9648775,0.0064034546,0.011287091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029998559,0.00005727813,0.08435051,0.0010166138,0.00006151655,0.0006129019,0.057809792,0.005102966,0.00052626774,0.22670789,0.6235387,0.00018564612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98518515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11335257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11335257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060701393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8224343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274568678","doi":"","title":"Oppression: Reducing Canadian Corporate Law to a Muddy Default","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Context (archaeology); Default; Law and economics; Corporation; Shareholder; Corporate law; Business; Default rule; Obligation; Law; Ex-ante; Economics; Corporate governance; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.05813269913851696,"score_gpt":0.3201240785337208,"score_spread":0.2619913793952039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274568678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19269347,0.0015554113,0.06904578,0.01617898,0.00026102,0.00047951913,0.00015716064,0.00034303463,0.71928567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470224,0.00047994926,0.015499003,0.0027628446,0.00006867331,0.00010780537,0.000075317716,0.000057127756,0.033927012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886953,0.0016948263,0.00026107565,0.0013958835,0.0054914076,0.0024615356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944173,0.0016754996,0.0003819155,0.0011853542,0.0018185885,0.0005213236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005973887,0.00042162716,0.00065380527,0.0016149546,0.0075148474,0.0065868287,0.0028941748,0.003824627,0.007376844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022722574,0.00037208732,0.0007003059,0.0013652516,0.013071633,0.004223967,0.007330422,0.005882117,0.00046490584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016021871,0.00002140723,0.000828398,0.00002403251,0.000006594592,0.00015492608,0.0012170665,0.0023221215,0.00033214543,0.97549415,0.0026909246,0.016892198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010016542,0.00011889448,0.0055348338,0.00034719775,0.00009357337,0.00031637447,0.002438012,0.029276408,0.0016620716,0.82501245,0.13499023,0.000109769135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6337893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63883555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3662107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034879167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0531192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73673475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275063425","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n1p35","title":"The Superficies Right in the Light of the Romanian Land Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Front (military); Law; Context (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Political science; Land law; Property rights; Land tenure; Law and economics; Geography; Economics; Meteorology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012909153728013475,"score_gpt":0.27636769413172746,"score_spread":0.26345854040371397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275063425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058332223,0.002286774,0.004989906,0.013448901,0.00024303647,0.000029230356,0.000057208923,0.000018520963,0.9205942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585424,0.00062641874,0.001963127,0.0030008398,0.00016214793,0.000035359106,0.000024254703,0.00002096121,0.035624474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947212,0.0027748903,0.00019554191,0.000703674,0.00087102846,0.0007337485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988024,0.00047060027,0.00014736626,0.00026790838,0.00020530887,0.00010636089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040770713,0.00020550811,0.00044339997,0.00064682256,0.0048164744,0.0063551073,0.0005826556,0.0025073397,0.004937437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053211222,0.00026410888,0.00036598125,0.00068022433,0.020330725,0.0034734642,0.0032572206,0.005910719,0.0007682351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036752954,0.00000361865,0.00023248563,0.0000069335797,0.0000012499258,0.000069905574,0.0013952763,0.00003789408,0.00005159555,0.9953597,0.0009913915,0.0018462817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024775221,0.00006635507,0.005767319,0.00033747745,0.000018510236,0.0007232002,0.0067907227,0.00091131736,0.00077081245,0.5846463,0.39990515,0.000038062954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006340138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008408106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063551073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040201903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004068984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029168606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275510070","doi":"","title":"Muscutt V. Courcelles Revisited: The Court of Appeal for Ontario Takes Another Look","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Political science; Nova scotia; Test (biology); Sociology","score_opus":0.015204145546308794,"score_gpt":0.28545294949615346,"score_spread":0.2702488039498447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275510070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038276225,0.019290792,0.0013685091,0.59338677,0.0026879332,0.000100697325,0.0011284753,0.000097282034,0.34366336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.632619,0.010221072,0.0018374986,0.19787426,0.0024729972,0.000100198326,0.0005068256,0.00020579252,0.15416235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900018,0.00079402997,0.00030549907,0.0011073084,0.0048324536,0.002958887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916324,0.0021784143,0.00038283184,0.00033096012,0.0036001091,0.0018751634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005614883,0.0004181891,0.00077112863,0.0021237673,0.026405875,0.012250256,0.0036902314,0.01243329,0.008052917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015817337,0.0007436405,0.0011357864,0.0038499779,0.013333884,0.0042169453,0.00256559,0.012171936,0.00057285145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007762998,0.000017351484,0.0064580026,0.00014843428,0.000068059664,0.0013674271,0.0075544333,0.0003958602,0.00058306055,0.6526462,0.31110448,0.01957916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009468378,0.000029224308,0.027658613,0.0006450149,0.00014326921,0.0003056716,0.009897127,0.0009765366,0.00041633143,0.057907335,0.90165436,0.00027178202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18826012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18826012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19177859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9415032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275732292","doi":"","title":"Deconstructing Directness in Canada: A Critical Evaluation of the Role of Directness in the Tort of Battery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Tort reform; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.01342946052622324,"score_gpt":0.291847602946881,"score_spread":0.27841814242065777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275732292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21099286,0.024767028,0.008495623,0.2658871,0.001540796,0.00052989676,0.0008392072,0.00008285146,0.4868646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9222845,0.0102707185,0.002428494,0.043562375,0.00026767142,0.00015624172,0.00012053521,0.00008531737,0.020824099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671026,0.0047173193,0.0009054549,0.0023733838,0.013640684,0.011260581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93581164,0.031624753,0.0021989285,0.001971523,0.024236292,0.0041569294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023649663,0.0012157214,0.0018396762,0.007260812,0.052509625,0.026187126,0.011687523,0.018871527,0.007252059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08193794,0.0012435509,0.0016404922,0.0111731095,0.06606332,0.012549233,0.013592164,0.02564534,0.00030634383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005381589,0.000035174537,0.0042899325,0.00018215181,0.000047434733,0.00041621146,0.02131894,0.0010336947,0.00011819859,0.9419779,0.017879784,0.012646868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021853804,0.00011866023,0.027849266,0.004697124,0.00092850457,0.0005770843,0.19380143,0.004749151,0.001567962,0.39352217,0.3712279,0.00074229727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99537164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25365877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25365877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.51691854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86565006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275973070","doi":"","title":"The Trials and Tribulations of Personal Property Security Law Reform in Australia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Law reform; Law; Property law; Law and economics; Political science; Property rights; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2305476651033335,"score_gpt":0.464407304604246,"score_spread":0.23385963950091251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275973070","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04825766,0.4983441,0.0016533936,0.25027385,0.008918156,0.00053695496,0.00024065156,0.000047323218,0.19172792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.521775,0.29485032,0.0034512351,0.1213011,0.002504552,0.00077916693,0.00025269398,0.00007545771,0.055010412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9490753,0.030963061,0.003768011,0.0018496979,0.012249672,0.00209432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92113906,0.053111468,0.0051811542,0.002397275,0.017131925,0.0010389907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04969601,0.00025052857,0.0010175301,0.0029806755,0.0029544595,0.0067006825,0.0020803092,0.0038064593,0.0033150497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111935936,0.00039785716,0.0010538483,0.0042290464,0.0058296714,0.0058603166,0.0030480232,0.005722474,0.0005012493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024947088,0.00012635108,0.0016525029,0.017038243,0.00034578834,0.0006478043,0.022213044,0.0007604576,0.0010392498,0.58157516,0.14250052,0.23185149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112270805,0.0003775386,0.016095301,0.019408453,0.00046191007,0.00019125959,0.009079373,0.00033607942,0.0014364044,0.02291049,0.92951244,0.000078517856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05868989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08551063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05868989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01719554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033704333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26282078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276289665","doi":"10.1515/9780748697755","title":"Trusts and Patrimonies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Relation (database); Appropriation; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Trust law; Public law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061434352808634365,"score_gpt":0.2671070681944161,"score_spread":0.20567271538578175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276289665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05131736,0.03717809,0.0034094905,0.021531994,0.0005318113,0.00003074574,0.00008148586,0.000033778702,0.88588506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008713,0.009283158,0.0006032589,0.0012013505,0.00013538724,0.000020836413,0.000039999784,0.000028966864,0.08781569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752265,0.0008362554,0.00006316412,0.00018085344,0.00072584144,0.000671195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980835,0.00095964136,0.00018838476,0.00015551121,0.00036450478,0.0002485043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015960778,0.00038545296,0.00042513985,0.001718545,0.0073173107,0.008542057,0.0009807597,0.0017852759,0.005960216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040367893,0.0002430671,0.00026580977,0.0029442233,0.02960174,0.0059510237,0.0025627215,0.002030475,0.00036918433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008689856,0.0000069419602,0.0005435702,0.000045129334,0.000003956119,0.00017477112,0.02723405,0.00019258716,0.00005320624,0.9480862,0.010988734,0.012662183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013794221,0.000030357809,0.0073258085,0.00072635384,0.000018529257,0.00050034316,0.049845885,0.00080242055,0.0001872599,0.17681576,0.7636847,0.00004883481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6137056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67217976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6137056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039612237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016426444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77713877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277183366","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.1.3","title":"Proroguing the Parliament of Australia: The Effect on the Senate and the Conventions that Constrain the Prerogative Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Commonwealth; Prerogative; Constitution; Law; Scrutiny; Politics; Political science; Power (physics); House of Commons; Sociology","score_opus":0.06500949117634366,"score_gpt":0.35622047821575353,"score_spread":0.29121098703940984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277183366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46489525,0.0034804046,0.0023499734,0.046754528,0.00035812607,0.00010510067,0.00010057432,0.000070610455,0.4818854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545314,0.0006231628,0.0004939136,0.0047381395,0.0000875052,0.000051785624,0.000014766405,0.000033302862,0.039426062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795679,0.011249253,0.0006374938,0.0009864529,0.0042868056,0.0032722286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97847235,0.010463161,0.0024734274,0.0012350329,0.0048985723,0.0024575305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010308339,0.00022365442,0.00038716246,0.0013332303,0.0096725,0.008231725,0.0010700057,0.0025730734,0.007904083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022826597,0.00058295525,0.00036336726,0.0010254786,0.0106596695,0.0026214086,0.008141715,0.004981069,0.0009884862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040590073,0.00017146888,0.030646754,0.00050083676,0.00012452887,0.0019172342,0.06445603,0.001378762,0.0072034854,0.80713195,0.021147752,0.06491537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013318037,0.00074106635,0.29708463,0.0015461936,0.00021764197,0.00075526105,0.039171074,0.0031118577,0.009082173,0.07007155,0.5776566,0.00042871555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1724175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31779853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1724175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012507437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017615674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34282786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227741215","doi":"","title":"AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF ANTITRUST LAW: BUSINESS MEETING: Toronto, Canada August 10, 1988 MINUTES","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Vice president; Law; Word (group theory); Political science; Management; Engineering; Advertising; Linguistics; Business; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011016102028500126,"score_gpt":0.2543102798364026,"score_spread":0.24329417780790247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227741215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031224932,0.013147034,0.0005637927,0.086932,0.017822666,0.00038851498,0.0069295554,0.00062293245,0.870471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003404574,0.0013296062,0.00013614919,0.003303279,0.00067686965,0.000049707283,0.0005339368,0.000056473807,0.9905095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985753,0.00006422426,0.00004473654,0.00017051354,0.0007203832,0.00042473656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973605,0.00016438485,0.00006109843,0.00007879679,0.0019143777,0.00042079453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012803759,0.0007854092,0.00052391074,0.001600949,0.0079026995,0.004756091,0.0010241459,0.0076215137,0.15386625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029669378,0.0007790939,0.00042665013,0.0016751321,0.0011155907,0.0013878398,0.0010478446,0.00483306,0.07653104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066954913,0.000006752337,0.0001272472,0.00001186782,7.036538e-7,0.000019041852,0.000043189844,0.000011488434,0.00005939617,0.0017267223,0.99553406,0.0024528815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005284833,0.0000031718753,0.0020393434,0.00004545913,0.0000020374846,0.000008904469,0.000108951936,0.000024862535,0.000049064387,0.0002924084,0.9974147,0.000005753211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67454493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90677536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32545507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02198866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030948944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65474343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278141419","doi":"","title":"An abuse of process - traditionally: Smith v Lucht [2014] QDC 302","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Political science; Action (physics); Law; Process (computing); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02353030970696702,"score_gpt":0.28159395008106713,"score_spread":0.2580636403741001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278141419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04442265,0.0071233497,0.011158685,0.30007696,0.0023178866,0.00043669355,0.00045244163,0.000179137,0.6338322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49348676,0.0014883118,0.002948059,0.333967,0.00091267057,0.00034407925,0.00008659581,0.000065347995,0.16670118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771781,0.0062264,0.0010067446,0.003357493,0.008239483,0.003991839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920603,0.0044135586,0.00054518523,0.00053415267,0.0019015275,0.0005452627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013783362,0.0006194315,0.00066235807,0.0012076463,0.010527358,0.008284641,0.0027550955,0.025131168,0.0057713417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023737866,0.0010226741,0.001483341,0.0011714709,0.017153235,0.0057875016,0.006815777,0.019339297,0.0009498255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004455865,0.000022846272,0.0010172193,0.0000923024,0.000019295545,0.0005378381,0.007176713,0.00013562529,0.0005379335,0.9193117,0.064851195,0.0062528234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119219854,0.0002916607,0.007870173,0.0010567477,0.00015523107,0.0011153362,0.0046652583,0.0006732781,0.0025270975,0.200252,0.78102016,0.00025384594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1676352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2348386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1676352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015074058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028729165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3333189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278469572","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4416","title":"INSTITUTIONAL INEQUALITY AND THE DYNAMICS OF COURAGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Status quo; Courage; Political science; Solidarity; Power (physics); Sociology; Inequality; Welfare economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04119052759485642,"score_gpt":0.34313834799685616,"score_spread":0.30194782040199974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278469572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21842587,0.0039060793,0.029914174,0.0308452,0.00030239593,0.00006944601,0.00006334406,0.0001723235,0.71630114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914846,0.00048930914,0.0010356565,0.00037748044,0.00005463588,0.000032896984,0.000011645738,0.00003788738,0.006475997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943862,0.0032724221,0.000117642936,0.0007319277,0.00075304945,0.00073882437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243367,0.0039520576,0.0010833493,0.0009740724,0.0005467689,0.0010101151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005164979,0.00038678746,0.000415744,0.0017502052,0.009132422,0.015673673,0.0011696272,0.0023311567,0.007639375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012399891,0.00031380428,0.0003901885,0.0012633584,0.05567439,0.011758278,0.0128028495,0.0034837157,0.0006703527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136730605,0.00001278026,0.0005887495,0.000019551604,0.000004065117,0.0001433904,0.022715144,0.0003258551,0.00010542155,0.97018564,0.0006467715,0.0052388366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015077683,0.0000243865,0.0009923925,0.00009352839,0.000006344815,0.00010521088,0.012371856,0.00083017943,0.00016743495,0.92132765,0.06403822,0.00002771735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049466128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040099123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015673673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065017403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004119445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04717362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279288638","doi":"10.7202/1027548ar","title":"Jacques Beaulne, La liquidation des successions, Collection Bleue, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2002, 446 pages, ISBN 2-89127-552-7","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0267622015676392,"score_gpt":0.28071464273306934,"score_spread":0.25395244116543014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279288638","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004138237,0.8268554,0.0029958198,0.012426064,0.0053985165,0.000046555477,0.0011377748,0.00035362542,0.15037249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006430691,0.44457003,0.0027208673,0.002177569,0.0025075346,0.00008225692,0.0009273433,0.00043141822,0.54015225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894613,0.00011113693,0.00008660216,0.00020101089,0.0005689695,0.00008614582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990602,0.00030089752,0.00009960613,0.000052197618,0.000387077,0.00010004109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010854573,0.0020119883,0.0015533165,0.004835317,0.0022519608,0.0051946687,0.0019738672,0.0020928653,0.16210449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021810243,0.0009330035,0.0006998879,0.008778508,0.0019117101,0.007389431,0.0015222395,0.0025454778,0.063699335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030022557,0.00001429997,0.00016032452,0.00069056626,0.000013692784,0.000048218924,0.00030200282,0.00013214914,0.00028060173,0.014022186,0.87380934,0.110496655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004771377,0.0000056493695,0.0005483385,0.00027030264,0.0000059658314,0.00009832096,0.0001270417,0.00005282977,0.000120020784,0.0016087068,0.9971476,0.00001035744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19421093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30361754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80578905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009080021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005618797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54229355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279557094","doi":"10.4172/2169-0170.1000171","title":"Corporate Governance and the Business Judgment Rule: Fiduciary Duties of Directors in Canada and the Peoples Republic of China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business judgment rule; Corporate governance; China; Statutory law; Statute; Corporate law; Business; Accounting; People's Republic; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.01417899975251771,"score_gpt":0.2366017304234648,"score_spread":0.2224227306709471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279557094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8542883,0.0042142333,0.0006725879,0.017136833,0.00008630148,0.00005732635,0.00024247052,0.000013720642,0.12328822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937789,0.00056560873,0.00013018824,0.0005910337,0.0000077341365,0.000004985102,0.000030785533,0.0000023024281,0.004888505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971155,0.00026140234,0.00007735444,0.00022860925,0.00089273456,0.0014244256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995799,0.0010089028,0.0005648044,0.00012558818,0.0018154449,0.0006862198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002066182,0.00018025456,0.00031334208,0.0021826727,0.009776164,0.004427741,0.0009431199,0.0010842449,0.0014766642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067110336,0.00020657075,0.00023815493,0.0035591186,0.0076694703,0.00096972,0.0015038685,0.0019503763,0.00005669001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001399994,0.000073336225,0.18274127,0.00017849386,0.00006711757,0.0016141888,0.04890982,0.0026584517,0.00082202454,0.67907387,0.019679394,0.064042024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010606543,0.00005165314,0.6797673,0.0004677725,0.00016551859,0.0003474054,0.061006438,0.00603796,0.0014993079,0.03844279,0.21187176,0.00023610692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8938356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10616441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15599228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7702803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279668188","doi":"","title":"Book Review: English Private Law edited by Peter Birks","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Law; Kingdom; Common law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.006411134418095388,"score_gpt":0.2677741661043712,"score_spread":0.26136303168627584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279668188","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026260904,0.7114983,0.0007107268,0.03824078,0.024110757,0.000062374995,0.00080608315,0.00020482093,0.22410353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031809576,0.37983444,0.00082444836,0.013443821,0.010256047,0.0000832387,0.001086168,0.00023283326,0.5910581],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928564,0.00011400482,0.00005034349,0.00009526795,0.00039697022,0.000057766953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978777,0.0008879925,0.00010831796,0.00010884317,0.00085547956,0.00016152755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008313163,0.000996462,0.0012662334,0.0049558384,0.0013814665,0.0040998883,0.0011025424,0.0019734935,0.13007438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038800803,0.000519784,0.00041825368,0.0060215862,0.0011955303,0.004455891,0.0016158549,0.0026268535,0.08553614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025270892,0.000004653022,0.000018594365,0.00016818174,0.000001100564,0.0000151488475,0.000033253415,0.000025084553,0.000019165667,0.0018782662,0.9643877,0.03344634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013758098,0.0000021274072,0.00013116492,0.00060392224,0.0000014964812,0.000052616215,0.00004477459,0.000010362516,0.000010623097,0.00093815953,0.99820065,0.0000028386742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010395488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024941083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13007438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026689845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039766417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43514216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279775422","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.003","title":"Trusts: the essentials","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03235138116290452,"score_gpt":0.2399973687562188,"score_spread":0.20764598759331426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279775422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006316735,0.024236403,0.03526703,0.09666379,0.0013178968,0.0000670985,0.00017952945,0.000088251065,0.83586323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82250375,0.02055171,0.009960888,0.009166411,0.002757313,0.0002618894,0.00014581901,0.00021185567,0.13444039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935116,0.003474682,0.00034043493,0.0005865277,0.0015179748,0.0005687546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99019814,0.00594545,0.00068680354,0.0014522253,0.0011427371,0.0005746588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060930243,0.0006338511,0.0009644102,0.001535619,0.0042401757,0.013841807,0.0013592914,0.006442994,0.013567993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016046967,0.0007460165,0.00038868384,0.0018044482,0.03984447,0.021528935,0.004428416,0.0077472334,0.002424996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001301391,0.0000018349264,0.000019067384,0.000010339989,0.0000010166162,0.000010990477,0.00034752366,0.000023996297,0.0000063998214,0.99592423,0.0021381213,0.0015152126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044228186,0.0000030926146,0.000059358998,0.00009257992,0.0000021912003,0.000039507846,0.0003642316,0.00011811828,0.00002083701,0.9517058,0.047585852,0.000004116776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006024724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048185866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013841807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061117327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066720597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045389414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281547316","doi":"","title":"Appeals and the British Columbia Court of Appeal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.005250886943123571,"score_gpt":0.25438494711599974,"score_spread":0.24913406017287618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281547316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02397839,0.019510387,0.00097644376,0.14424162,0.0034291733,0.00015494121,0.0013838976,0.00013449053,0.8061907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33887136,0.0075088143,0.0013398732,0.035344902,0.0009391709,0.00014534153,0.00045365465,0.00018337619,0.61521363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904715,0.0011251926,0.00035213886,0.0009151377,0.0042412626,0.002894838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98961616,0.003078514,0.00027297242,0.0003863069,0.005053459,0.0015926692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003910856,0.00047280686,0.00078413414,0.0034943095,0.032466333,0.016308956,0.0027198107,0.011489195,0.032989234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028078163,0.0012216548,0.0005597371,0.004224585,0.009407696,0.0024800273,0.0037455629,0.0138540175,0.0037623276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051833515,0.00002964203,0.0026929446,0.000109076114,0.000036683537,0.0008363854,0.0027368919,0.00056682003,0.00028798883,0.43078265,0.5242182,0.037650883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030192356,0.000012703816,0.015329487,0.0006374862,0.000056087418,0.0001751665,0.0040496057,0.00076161895,0.000282382,0.041152965,0.9373084,0.00020399626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10926713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10926713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13048826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7927922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281930280","doi":"","title":"Reflections of a Supervisory Order Sceptic: Ten Years after Doucet-Boudreau","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Competence (human resources); Legislature; Order (exchange); Legislation; Political science; Declaration; Skepticism; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.021374184181167807,"score_gpt":0.33474988746909323,"score_spread":0.3133757032879254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281930280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009004111,0.008119009,0.0009685361,0.9403741,0.006985074,0.000024484278,0.00005229239,0.00003233084,0.03444013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2154151,0.005021683,0.0015774686,0.6976407,0.0035765367,0.00007354961,0.000030094388,0.00026598948,0.07639893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765474,0.007080433,0.0005828981,0.003633665,0.007547011,0.0046086395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686447,0.016854968,0.0010242597,0.0009336878,0.007351665,0.0051907175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020644907,0.000642058,0.000967898,0.0011824111,0.038825598,0.022658754,0.0043336907,0.03195084,0.0043267007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047421988,0.0011177118,0.0012452275,0.0013551093,0.04976434,0.010165929,0.0063318284,0.065169774,0.0008679839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042706462,0.00007265224,0.0008330816,0.00007178678,0.0000169547,0.0010939399,0.045561817,0.0002856983,0.0003639266,0.5665442,0.3754458,0.009667341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024655501,0.00002642668,0.00072791404,0.0004109809,0.0000086299215,0.00015762968,0.015277912,0.00023506136,0.00040286788,0.026062638,0.9565641,0.0001012733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6694529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68065095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6694529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07303124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08136766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66498744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282589353","doi":"10.14288/1.0077670","title":"Directors’ duty of care, diligence and skill : a comparative study of Japanese and Canadian law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty of care; Diligence; Law; Duty; Business; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012521587716377508,"score_gpt":0.23303929518894725,"score_spread":0.22051770747256974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282589353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84050566,0.010328265,0.00022111576,0.004733736,0.0000762976,0.00005197068,0.00042511633,0.000013483082,0.14364439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850642,0.0058427965,0.00022408292,0.00080462056,0.000026672842,0.000014043635,0.0002902037,0.000013038787,0.007720234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510753,0.00037217065,0.00019546364,0.00028446113,0.0021650363,0.0018753463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98841757,0.0021241042,0.0013527669,0.00019263098,0.0064699957,0.0014428969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030072953,0.0003219395,0.00054249354,0.008471229,0.012757001,0.005140099,0.00116894,0.0012334202,0.004512615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009527294,0.00034346682,0.00052757194,0.01722309,0.004382946,0.0020937857,0.0021243556,0.0014042171,0.0002490976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042322336,0.00024770355,0.3075245,0.0012599347,0.00016739119,0.0027865602,0.4465846,0.00050543714,0.0026212947,0.12280567,0.021137115,0.09393662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018999754,0.000067826164,0.6805697,0.0005157052,0.0001584105,0.00047631297,0.20728062,0.00037407133,0.00031704933,0.00090953923,0.109175764,0.00013606207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08777791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08777791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055762116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63687634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283123882","doi":"","title":"Directions to Convict","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convict; Jury; Sanctions; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Jury trial; Business","score_opus":0.00805930213869166,"score_gpt":0.28745944434127707,"score_spread":0.2794001422025854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283123882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36375657,0.0015849817,0.020305578,0.026402513,0.0030378585,0.00087449444,0.0010904006,0.0005093983,0.5824382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88236415,0.00041491305,0.005774559,0.0040166075,0.00023707762,0.00032720485,0.00039840487,0.00013427704,0.10633273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301004,0.0017231553,0.00051175535,0.0010514146,0.0021827945,0.0015209477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815221,0.005151994,0.0024356567,0.001774782,0.0066928235,0.0024227658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007653222,0.000211261,0.00037084823,0.001226719,0.0055532916,0.0025092068,0.0018354232,0.0024986917,0.017544758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06663811,0.0003864445,0.00029654175,0.00061432784,0.001817834,0.001896792,0.0026168148,0.0051925494,0.004461468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094237115,0.00036134684,0.03819551,0.00035514607,0.000083125546,0.004065782,0.018517414,0.0027033512,0.004142287,0.44777834,0.20789498,0.27496028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019272426,0.0011397026,0.07665712,0.00088632916,0.000087214525,0.0019082105,0.023659796,0.002693039,0.0034717857,0.12659109,0.7624455,0.00026743795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011885014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04362155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017544758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002229482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064544505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05869305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283532380","doi":"","title":"A ‘Real and Substantial’ Improvement? Van Breda Reformulates the Law of Jurisdiction in Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Doctrine; Scrutiny; Assertion; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.017180844954554207,"score_gpt":0.2577566403773341,"score_spread":0.24057579542277988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283532380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16538922,0.0069976817,0.014729914,0.13939902,0.00073156215,0.00013630796,0.0003877454,0.0000857854,0.6721428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591079,0.0012132382,0.003031079,0.005105878,0.000084410414,0.000035369103,0.0000444152,0.000024087727,0.031353634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490225,0.0011268564,0.0001321016,0.0006102462,0.0018124855,0.0014160916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979407,0.00067489006,0.0001297631,0.00016608574,0.0007680906,0.00032040649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002966801,0.0001924604,0.00027849947,0.0008183468,0.011968122,0.0068004974,0.0018575601,0.0028711406,0.0031174896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059542605,0.00038810642,0.00040455954,0.0010086659,0.022264581,0.003282562,0.0029788183,0.0033347497,0.00024340521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006456737,0.0000027042581,0.0007124296,0.000015269408,0.0000031406762,0.00009032407,0.0041014566,0.0001876543,0.000148638,0.98758614,0.0043157153,0.0028301154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060031256,0.000042212458,0.0103646,0.00035409915,0.00005239626,0.00021534812,0.013588942,0.0025548807,0.0007302467,0.36926046,0.6026312,0.00014555863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96662384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10031712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10031712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09002637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7278551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283753333","doi":"","title":"La consécration par la Cour suprême du Canada d'un principe directeur imposant l'exécution du contrat de bonne foi. Variations sur le droit commun","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recueil Dalloz","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01606140242673062,"score_gpt":0.23392655419616937,"score_spread":0.21786515176943874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283753333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03133679,0.008874705,0.009842187,0.060968645,0.0023081214,0.00014011517,0.0006034834,0.0001598808,0.8857661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5514563,0.0032739136,0.005957479,0.013456975,0.0005019789,0.00010863316,0.0001412762,0.0001431972,0.42496032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941287,0.0005419518,0.000156053,0.0007197615,0.0028067185,0.0016466968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776137,0.0004431112,0.00009900296,0.0001841475,0.0012624345,0.0002498847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028089534,0.0005896293,0.00052280456,0.0008527771,0.013059153,0.009755805,0.0015589211,0.00551282,0.008604701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071479375,0.00048218557,0.0007501006,0.0011713487,0.01224436,0.0018082131,0.0026570584,0.010023649,0.00067387446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001540995,0.000007021414,0.0005099771,0.000028387141,0.000010373692,0.00008679725,0.0019558552,0.00019702251,0.00023110573,0.9743256,0.017219521,0.005413038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043228574,0.00002882298,0.0044367877,0.00031629266,0.000052180825,0.0001781711,0.0024125695,0.00065612496,0.0011706491,0.07916064,0.91145265,0.000091946524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.949813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.972204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05146811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05146811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10310271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37342906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283895241","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139005302.005","title":"Unequal transactions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.054205197216962535,"score_gpt":0.23937472253632422,"score_spread":0.18516952531936168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283895241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010879887,0.0026005935,0.042032436,0.0047265664,0.00043185774,0.000118539676,0.00024043588,0.00008915493,0.9388805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5700216,0.00487492,0.016280098,0.0027720742,0.0007220244,0.00041073264,0.0004076199,0.00019469383,0.4043162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920283,0.0025564474,0.00042366228,0.0017232504,0.0023942536,0.0008741865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956167,0.0014566142,0.00036003775,0.0016028458,0.0006437302,0.00032006638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043193754,0.00072116684,0.0006644451,0.0017630248,0.0034066606,0.009887587,0.0016153405,0.003409093,0.051326003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010337584,0.00046533212,0.0005614231,0.0021183619,0.010715491,0.013444715,0.006601122,0.0034408187,0.0069941124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006119901,0.0000042623315,0.000059166767,0.00001373294,0.0000031893505,0.000021055295,0.00025553352,0.000107555155,0.00005382281,0.9929467,0.002083934,0.0044450616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010945882,0.000015005602,0.000283364,0.000118476826,0.000010295627,0.0001777593,0.00047274627,0.00066530204,0.000287291,0.8568453,0.14110199,0.000011568975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022152353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016137963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051326003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048216977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022777293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17170262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284167226","doi":"","title":"Solving the \"Khadr Problem\": Retention of Jurisdiction – A Comparative Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Prerogative; Charter; Law; Legitimacy; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.044208402781296376,"score_gpt":0.33394452287516324,"score_spread":0.28973612009386684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284167226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72318435,0.0037320442,0.0033283068,0.0075998483,0.00010585315,0.00007017395,0.000046307978,0.000015202979,0.26191795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967174,0.0005918936,0.00030354518,0.00037793996,0.000020177922,0.000011384903,0.000010936576,0.000003734146,0.0019628792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917787,0.0039245337,0.00023865748,0.0005454337,0.001916143,0.001596546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442863,0.0030740188,0.0007823673,0.00046230113,0.0009202334,0.00033237325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075642685,0.00012536441,0.00046906952,0.0025181943,0.011270642,0.005972059,0.0016267891,0.0023697084,0.00395779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013953434,0.00016870454,0.0003142782,0.0037748395,0.014288407,0.0056156465,0.005722604,0.0025321275,0.0002367709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078726654,0.0000878648,0.011054938,0.00016232108,0.000029678147,0.0014506046,0.13825752,0.00042613648,0.00039111043,0.80565184,0.0031444372,0.039264817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006842393,0.00041146248,0.060904983,0.0010193001,0.0001541507,0.0026456276,0.6390208,0.0017670473,0.0017800032,0.07887215,0.21324722,0.00010887267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027007442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04052633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97299254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007348459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00682401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053700447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284807334","doi":"10.4337/9781781001844.00027","title":"What makes a good law of security?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law; Legislation; Flexibility (engineering); Commission; Security interest; Personal property; Government (linguistics); Business; Law reform; Political science; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Economics; Management","score_opus":0.05386183991491904,"score_gpt":0.3023211428072558,"score_spread":0.24845930289233675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284807334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034718735,0.034057677,0.013002937,0.14077465,0.0030915977,0.00005498171,0.000118111486,0.00011668068,0.80531144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40039626,0.062789194,0.018926596,0.05459912,0.007934937,0.00031165796,0.0002770228,0.0003349014,0.4544303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655676,0.0013758797,0.00014005907,0.00033273053,0.0012056283,0.0003890259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715996,0.0017766042,0.00016058884,0.00032802674,0.00040846757,0.00016633513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003623959,0.0005682064,0.00068691734,0.0013298849,0.0037947658,0.008865366,0.0010150084,0.004362349,0.007133718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006227953,0.0005044737,0.00053693465,0.0012263731,0.02844755,0.015112379,0.002247196,0.006511823,0.0032259447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010729542,0.0000032960209,0.000021635105,0.000021081552,0.0000010535962,0.000013802854,0.0005461983,0.000044840228,0.000021142156,0.9888292,0.00796361,0.0025330058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038147555,0.000007930255,0.00012349068,0.00018398867,0.0000028738498,0.000050022245,0.0005856551,0.00011233226,0.00006696755,0.71974367,0.27911097,0.000008394868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069311443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004869554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008865366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005534312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053754738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040154397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286749767","doi":"10.5040/9781782256595.ch-005","title":"A Common Law of Tort: Is there a European Rift in the Common Law Family?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Common law; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.05292366498892963,"score_gpt":0.2866313062738123,"score_spread":0.23370764128488264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286749767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034824986,0.047341667,0.018069187,0.05575803,0.0011106435,0.000027525286,0.0000448772,0.000048643684,0.84277445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82936776,0.021171324,0.006466974,0.014112351,0.0011635692,0.00006642614,0.00005890645,0.000106077525,0.12748653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658716,0.0015277226,0.00012881661,0.000491996,0.00086717645,0.0003971994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976769,0.00133062,0.00018617098,0.0003475088,0.00028607657,0.00017275667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035265773,0.00031719837,0.00052504806,0.0012078823,0.0036877056,0.0075927074,0.00087053457,0.0029448378,0.0033729621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048401146,0.00020083653,0.00042846877,0.0019253313,0.030771738,0.012180608,0.0028006702,0.004097741,0.0006795734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014370979,0.0000030260221,0.000052140153,0.0000069393814,9.43984e-7,0.000022656912,0.0020958546,0.000022428238,0.000014422748,0.99123996,0.0020942974,0.004445777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043501686,0.000018553133,0.0008972767,0.0002399481,0.000005244083,0.00024066794,0.0039579207,0.00032453617,0.00009496265,0.71772015,0.27648363,0.000012740819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007592661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064485334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075927074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005383896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039061736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039063096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286924293","doi":"10.29173/alr1440","title":"Resulting Trusts in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Constructive trust; Unjust enrichment; Certainty; Predictability; Trust law; Law and economics; Key (lock); Express trust; Business; Constructive; Law; Blind trust; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Process (computing); Computer security; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01813767615996056,"score_gpt":0.2982003670185493,"score_spread":0.28006269085858876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286924293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048159793,0.020001944,0.0041730828,0.12407819,0.0010013345,0.00014604749,0.00036301554,0.00010228599,0.8019743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92443377,0.007831811,0.001215182,0.013251697,0.00016757187,0.00004087723,0.00010716368,0.000039511582,0.052912444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856858,0.0019777673,0.0003855646,0.0009253626,0.0070921765,0.0039334605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868715,0.003723332,0.0006237983,0.00052761286,0.006490996,0.0017627421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006850068,0.00027470416,0.00043422135,0.0024103078,0.016391212,0.011790575,0.0018218941,0.0044367737,0.007936304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023469334,0.0003987607,0.0005940053,0.0033425845,0.016329326,0.0027896822,0.0042692297,0.0055117877,0.00041725687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010307486,0.0000088397055,0.0010142731,0.000063290165,0.000010153957,0.00023980452,0.0031997226,0.0003997899,0.000056605284,0.960112,0.022720609,0.012164669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006489632,0.000034007342,0.012997624,0.00090410426,0.00010487463,0.0002914704,0.010353647,0.0016873834,0.0004555711,0.3157548,0.6571819,0.00016981356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9769886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14713027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14713027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23435333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288251512","doi":"10.5040/9781509907373.ch-012","title":"Will-Substitutes and Creditors: Canada and the US","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.014751179162482999,"score_gpt":0.22315037304718316,"score_spread":0.20839919388470016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288251512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015375779,0.036020666,0.0014932008,0.04061946,0.0008893203,0.000046313242,0.00031431613,0.00006386115,0.90517706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42348498,0.038603686,0.0022305509,0.011710312,0.0002696777,0.000048184535,0.0002259888,0.00009198974,0.5233347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974456,0.00017726563,0.00004329605,0.0001811702,0.0013722967,0.0007804762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883825,0.00019216439,0.000050962553,0.000040870906,0.00061936665,0.00025832021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011060238,0.00050333,0.00037140475,0.0019654152,0.013636592,0.009152042,0.0011233857,0.0034225753,0.013285891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003142879,0.00031990217,0.00038630603,0.005329116,0.012610044,0.0038231977,0.002346155,0.0035327342,0.00077572395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001128953,0.0000059939835,0.00053834077,0.00004486763,0.000003204373,0.000090175825,0.0040598596,0.00017714109,0.000060651273,0.9152649,0.056911737,0.022831898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006798536,0.0000070090623,0.0016922161,0.00024315159,0.0000122276015,0.000108991946,0.0033288142,0.00018373116,0.00010617747,0.036299262,0.9579766,0.000035101908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102380715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102380715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13829416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74282753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288751138","doi":"","title":"Perez v Fernandez: Australia's First Decision on the Moral Right of Integrity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.16465806715027262,"score_gpt":0.37233947714757853,"score_spread":0.20768140999730592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288751138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070172526,0.008484214,0.0027166952,0.5222021,0.0033158627,0.00009209193,0.00013189422,0.000107408545,0.39277732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.594652,0.0025804364,0.0026566114,0.18140626,0.00061942695,0.000080138896,0.000034262088,0.00006718493,0.21790378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225813,0.0014801945,0.00020345951,0.00083549286,0.0036194304,0.0016032392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653083,0.0014205457,0.00020590409,0.0002387008,0.0011973529,0.00040674678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055584107,0.0002523178,0.00047451042,0.0008187758,0.010404327,0.0057638227,0.0015298707,0.013647121,0.00292793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015555033,0.000427933,0.00051599037,0.0006309845,0.00842351,0.0032786732,0.004456225,0.012467893,0.0004042371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049692342,0.000020519057,0.0007850385,0.00008352401,0.000014509038,0.0005878961,0.014226482,0.0002609435,0.000710985,0.8440935,0.12404689,0.015119977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031574426,0.000039336253,0.0054427776,0.0004293403,0.000047684054,0.00038220073,0.00446253,0.0005603109,0.0014676716,0.0933497,0.893673,0.000113767754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45893598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4503221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45893598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018408703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027121363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91252935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288936020","doi":"","title":"Litigation Privilege: Timeless or Transient? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Adversarial system; Political science; Governor; Economic Justice; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.013772687038745537,"score_gpt":0.29773114952466134,"score_spread":0.28395846248591583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288936020","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042401727,0.0107463,0.0021889287,0.5759486,0.0015388189,0.0000830988,0.00045108094,0.000107158536,0.3665343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74962753,0.0028574264,0.00097453664,0.16001827,0.00062330946,0.000052866857,0.00008945397,0.000059670336,0.085696965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905571,0.00079637783,0.00031812416,0.0010514423,0.003011748,0.0042652716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943364,0.0019897139,0.00041682634,0.00023603607,0.0013580243,0.0016629361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060365484,0.0002537685,0.00061801326,0.0011335625,0.016603779,0.014188784,0.0029354151,0.013120994,0.0069590784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01758634,0.00045252114,0.00044059363,0.0013564896,0.01625075,0.007937424,0.0036581517,0.010776171,0.00068265706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003008892,0.00002112152,0.0026862747,0.000057959536,0.000009562617,0.0008023976,0.008547827,0.00006593036,0.00033540267,0.87827927,0.09348114,0.015682902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051611245,0.00005110647,0.0124145625,0.0006867038,0.000044728087,0.00076131313,0.016725415,0.0004971765,0.0008362423,0.16751906,0.800219,0.0001930464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87618476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9437586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12381524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048725415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083282426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35352927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289204104","doi":"","title":"Loyalty and Politics: From Case Law to Statute Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Loyalty; Statute; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.06691496432112619,"score_gpt":0.36142300513393355,"score_spread":0.29450804081280735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289204104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0980186,0.037588157,0.105884425,0.27583647,0.0015395652,0.00013096865,0.00024323557,0.00012532371,0.48063335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681655,0.004833043,0.004828288,0.0091957105,0.0014136361,0.00012393668,0.000052304866,0.00006030423,0.01132719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991872,0.0052162404,0.00021945279,0.0007107705,0.0011066523,0.0008748352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661439,0.029156609,0.0011036101,0.0012229139,0.0012548275,0.0011181458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009008603,0.0004899587,0.0011627189,0.004959746,0.0061331578,0.01672595,0.0022837948,0.011497256,0.009834926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025788875,0.00080384186,0.00070510415,0.004790984,0.06732808,0.020147828,0.0052743847,0.008635242,0.0006015607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023070666,0.000012836823,0.00020133113,0.000011437282,0.0000021043616,0.000021931002,0.0006141277,0.00007846989,0.0000055185533,0.99616647,0.0012806262,0.0016028358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005286089,0.0000028775485,0.0001750434,0.00004382918,0.0000033952565,0.000025569358,0.00071540434,0.00035138224,0.000013989808,0.9940003,0.0046570348,0.0000058591695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010420551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010225633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01672595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006751564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063747303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048986256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290446389","doi":"","title":"Abusive or Unconscionable Clauses from a Common Law Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Unconscionability; Law; Perspective (graphical); Variety (cybernetics); Common law; Good faith; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0214632278646042,"score_gpt":0.30246412754324054,"score_spread":0.28100089967863634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290446389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050999735,0.025507623,0.124565944,0.12903453,0.0013293752,0.00017538485,0.00023692664,0.00007138919,0.66807914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9102493,0.006059254,0.022452326,0.018000226,0.0013839104,0.00022337875,0.00009448021,0.00004929569,0.04148793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927108,0.0025782397,0.00034095786,0.00090311124,0.0024267894,0.0010400407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937656,0.0042952104,0.00047861683,0.00046241915,0.0007399345,0.00025821532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076902895,0.0004574232,0.0007043553,0.0021617068,0.004782629,0.0070472127,0.0017836187,0.0066007716,0.0036157144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009085926,0.00038063037,0.0005296047,0.0027527707,0.053684562,0.0098652,0.0037047598,0.009021328,0.00045586136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.320223e-7,0.0000010645201,0.000017485138,0.0000031000832,3.978595e-7,0.000008403225,0.0002543453,0.000033274064,0.000009358977,0.99888724,0.00030036323,0.0004842241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034241134,0.0000050479503,0.00008754272,0.00003874898,0.0000031837633,0.000025455282,0.000329487,0.00022299477,0.00007669248,0.9791941,0.02000791,0.000005473085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021682652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025417136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021682652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063192165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007828971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045849264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290993188","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4549","title":"Taking Workers’ Rights Seriously: Private Prosecutions of Employment Standards Violations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Business; Compliance (psychology); Law; Stigma (botany); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.0647588706876264,"score_gpt":0.37551215272765415,"score_spread":0.3107532820400277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290993188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34671256,0.0056259995,0.009040912,0.22299711,0.0009700254,0.00020822065,0.0001696628,0.0001035756,0.4141719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9172598,0.0019243622,0.002131875,0.011604197,0.00029498962,0.00005581157,0.000056548623,0.00003281475,0.066639565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927343,0.00173048,0.0002923975,0.00044904868,0.0024667385,0.0023270126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902513,0.0033811629,0.0013691587,0.0010658668,0.0024118335,0.0015207529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004503347,0.00019899689,0.000274179,0.00095109193,0.014632009,0.0058111674,0.001425653,0.005108916,0.0048268326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014934088,0.00034083298,0.0002706342,0.0009452539,0.010199716,0.0032300993,0.004535195,0.003703602,0.00045649623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082883445,0.00020549673,0.0677215,0.00035550765,0.0000377022,0.005180614,0.19213447,0.0008932579,0.0032404417,0.37318054,0.099483944,0.25748366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057353765,0.00015917738,0.08800718,0.00094270083,0.00006191688,0.0023910138,0.1054246,0.0013870662,0.0018416028,0.05001199,0.7496133,0.000102130514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55031073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7717441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55031073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015872763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049100902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9046751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294554511","doi":"","title":"Beyond Real and Substantial Connection: The Muscutt Quintet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Appeal; Connection (principal bundle); Law; Political science; Test (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.01677404947289747,"score_gpt":0.2757890537461873,"score_spread":0.25901500427328983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294554511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4277998,0.0015605057,0.016420372,0.06695689,0.00035191953,0.00013742792,0.00023342748,0.00004863838,0.48649105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924476,0.000088816174,0.0009880763,0.0017079496,0.00003329987,0.000013287691,0.000016009499,0.000009073153,0.0046959543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953081,0.001038549,0.00012179124,0.001106792,0.0014400259,0.0009847245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552983,0.0020600408,0.00036828296,0.00046934068,0.0010842208,0.0004883509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004479549,0.00024335115,0.00045624172,0.0011326871,0.0075324937,0.0042395033,0.001345986,0.0033247215,0.007886383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019160448,0.00018808845,0.0005530242,0.0010816256,0.025771433,0.0052870233,0.0048823208,0.005450808,0.00033385342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008560363,0.000010603476,0.0032435656,0.000025267778,0.000011147364,0.000619243,0.00735322,0.00013948917,0.00032191936,0.9691204,0.004268845,0.014800781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007895592,0.000104603685,0.01937503,0.00014598004,0.00003088027,0.0007694152,0.011892538,0.0013854164,0.0008117388,0.8976502,0.06769905,0.000056179717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087870724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17057478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087870724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059883455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056305537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1747185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295058275","doi":"","title":"The Liability of Auditors beyond Their Clients: A Comparative Study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal liability; English law; Duty of care; Audit; Law; Liability; Insolvency; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Corporate law; Strict liability; Delict; Tort; Business; Shareholder; Creditor; Scholarship; Accounting; Political science; Comparative law; Commercial law; Private law; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.026301192138684412,"score_gpt":0.3435495991130119,"score_spread":0.3172484069743275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295058275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93298614,0.0075719072,0.00041087533,0.0029824716,0.00003917959,0.000028668037,0.000079650905,0.000009550176,0.055891596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937505,0.0028505821,0.00008049354,0.00024652385,0.000029282175,0.00000888772,0.000027512335,0.0000045421916,0.0030016203],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922464,0.0034194351,0.00042623607,0.00030714984,0.0019919442,0.001608899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657627,0.01994221,0.0063743885,0.00095218665,0.0047035515,0.0022649148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007093681,0.00016799006,0.00049573224,0.005136881,0.0053827707,0.0054289536,0.00082756486,0.0017542712,0.0049493266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03463344,0.00027865512,0.00031753664,0.0060450286,0.0037706422,0.0041568973,0.003233359,0.0014195578,0.00044982843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008117384,0.00059089024,0.29734877,0.00079638715,0.00010549586,0.0052206037,0.41496155,0.00079453015,0.0008621463,0.09064494,0.011002861,0.17686017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004827234,0.0006352288,0.43798566,0.0017073863,0.00015183412,0.007421278,0.4408698,0.0006440058,0.00072453794,0.004994582,0.1047356,0.00008178655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06798576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.107664764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06798576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011165473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056993426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13518012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295351461","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3325567","title":"Accounting for Risk: the Advent of Capped Conveyancing Title Insurance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Conveyancing; Business; Actuarial science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023808838581043264,"score_gpt":0.3118733381809001,"score_spread":0.2880644995998568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295351461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19851023,0.028907178,0.30920705,0.09598782,0.0041660885,0.00020044079,0.0008232795,0.0013804758,0.3608174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433763,0.0032122233,0.029315751,0.001973463,0.0017427703,0.000036567937,0.00009404907,0.00014720921,0.020101631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952803,0.0016056268,0.00015952396,0.00056546176,0.0019444288,0.0004445759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822,0.00993718,0.0015221142,0.0036511098,0.0020828638,0.00060671754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009467044,0.00064581906,0.0008393652,0.0015865903,0.0014046431,0.008550448,0.0032318623,0.0045626126,0.007568389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04046839,0.00055927737,0.0010368886,0.0015489365,0.005378146,0.0105411,0.0038834156,0.00853971,0.0006190013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008387381,0.000061022874,0.0018528296,0.000050465802,0.000029993444,0.0001884555,0.00045552483,0.01089721,0.000263628,0.9272528,0.0070163524,0.05184783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039712264,0.00008258982,0.001948015,0.00021903845,0.000044399723,0.00013913945,0.00020470243,0.0669489,0.0008062775,0.88040096,0.049079616,0.000086680346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011165105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007078278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011165105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043297587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004487948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050067127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296193066","doi":"","title":"Equity and trusts : commentary and materials (6th edition)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; High Court; Supreme court; Fiduciary; Equity (law); Statutory law; Law; Unconscionability; Estoppel; Political science; Duty; Doctrine","score_opus":0.030872604963333515,"score_gpt":0.2587661934669966,"score_spread":0.22789358850366306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296193066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004941742,0.016937375,0.0008070339,0.40236342,0.34707487,0.00032231768,0.0023638613,0.00028454702,0.22935243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008581597,0.012871443,0.0009715501,0.40741602,0.15275194,0.0012445148,0.0015109008,0.000459583,0.4141924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914191,0.001776042,0.0005829699,0.00047209553,0.004852047,0.00089776836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739535,0.014935211,0.0010186401,0.00066711224,0.008206936,0.0012186316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058840048,0.00113062,0.0008946203,0.0039449795,0.006410961,0.00815569,0.0042820717,0.021808006,0.06527717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04285966,0.0007908563,0.0012336893,0.0038043552,0.004010128,0.004190046,0.0043122163,0.011783827,0.033148535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027381825,0.0000029443752,0.0000052696105,0.00003856622,5.2672004e-7,0.000020271616,0.000096071584,0.000009583399,0.00001591834,0.0015291288,0.99656975,0.0017093122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000788471,0.000007666138,0.00027228854,0.0006793157,0.0000028774843,0.000032262786,0.00034143974,0.000029343793,0.000038444363,0.0024555742,0.9961152,0.000017736336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05228013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07317342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06527717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014070227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013833159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21837384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297388460","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Canadian Defamation Law as Applied to Corporate Plaintiffs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Falsity; Damages; Reputation; Law; Tort; Political science; Liability; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020971721582765536,"score_gpt":0.26020364175015326,"score_spread":0.23923192016738773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297388460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06259234,0.004077029,0.02439906,0.10680382,0.0017864371,0.00024176981,0.00010906226,0.0002584978,0.7997321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8078174,0.0025580903,0.016064769,0.042929396,0.0006638789,0.000145131,0.000053087697,0.00017602013,0.12959222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98290116,0.0032071546,0.00078978576,0.0019574668,0.008259714,0.002884825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98324007,0.0100890035,0.0007765131,0.0015902547,0.0036668882,0.00063729956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01527759,0.0003931241,0.000766452,0.0020621526,0.010998634,0.012591279,0.0027174682,0.015973851,0.005772713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034090973,0.00090061355,0.00094347587,0.0013387473,0.017720189,0.0062216753,0.005689893,0.016387653,0.0009644598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007409756,0.000016838949,0.00041459664,0.000025921903,0.0000046008136,0.00021975866,0.0031548834,0.00036124774,0.00039051942,0.98295295,0.0065991795,0.00585218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009518591,0.000111911955,0.00516847,0.0009179961,0.000108456574,0.0006021982,0.0031073806,0.007063626,0.0028385425,0.3585485,0.6211968,0.00024094668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37493178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40043977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6250682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026434502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028729636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7454989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297933009","doi":"","title":"Varying the Terms of A Trust - A New Power for the Courts?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Property (philosophy); Law; Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Power of attorney; Sociology; Law and economics; Genealogy; History; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Physics","score_opus":0.020531570139636454,"score_gpt":0.31211179774895914,"score_spread":0.2915802276093227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297933009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04071168,0.008361564,0.022099353,0.40350613,0.002560102,0.00005195052,0.000092620736,0.00011968424,0.52249694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129603,0.0017203646,0.0025598593,0.025662867,0.0013518757,0.000051322037,0.000030977444,0.00011755936,0.055544723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865043,0.005631646,0.0005023171,0.0016443115,0.002848393,0.0028690873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98532593,0.0057319896,0.0011831291,0.0022376217,0.0026398085,0.0028815079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012921184,0.00036099573,0.00073787884,0.0010620792,0.010429587,0.0165806,0.002043813,0.009518227,0.011527166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042133544,0.00046832763,0.0005181975,0.0011096929,0.027436864,0.028260533,0.008500378,0.012129004,0.0018203815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012120032,0.0000065458285,0.00019978448,0.000006877131,0.0000029361825,0.00006606678,0.0026240544,0.000045588316,0.000055411525,0.98540306,0.007585575,0.0039919857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030373474,0.0000345637,0.00045484913,0.00015564742,0.000014232095,0.00018323123,0.006566342,0.00038740213,0.00016936213,0.79079545,0.20116666,0.00004184314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023143243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028614772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023143243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011398216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010637209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08270019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298303551","doi":"","title":"Pure Economic Loss ‑ Has the High Court Reinvented the Square Wheel?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"High Court; Ex-ante; Point (geometry); Liability; Economics; Square (algebra); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.013455144413261472,"score_gpt":0.2650351697936472,"score_spread":0.25158002538038576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298303551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046095803,0.0075268387,0.013834374,0.7335672,0.0036813181,0.0000656924,0.00006623718,0.0000905488,0.19507203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66623867,0.0025055385,0.0031847588,0.27105603,0.0045093265,0.00006671439,0.000044635053,0.00010464185,0.052289765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824043,0.0044331467,0.00065445004,0.0022719146,0.007634324,0.0026019814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848284,0.0072872085,0.000969105,0.0015900765,0.0040240157,0.0013010976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024538822,0.00029569736,0.00094586634,0.0010296401,0.0066850386,0.01528625,0.0033757975,0.016438961,0.005317388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054779213,0.0006381706,0.0009765504,0.00089835614,0.023896242,0.02016715,0.0072104433,0.026884073,0.0015962344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003121617,0.000023734696,0.0007712071,0.00003273155,0.000019530555,0.0002665772,0.0016525413,0.00017358937,0.00014571288,0.9463011,0.030008947,0.020573204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073049814,0.00011089628,0.0028608046,0.00040381105,0.000046850026,0.0006705381,0.0026807946,0.001464328,0.00064977584,0.69216627,0.29871702,0.00015592152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034548182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028051408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034548182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00917052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009829851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12977529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298861215","doi":"","title":"Security Interests in Goods Held for Lease: The Double Perfection Requirement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Bankruptcy; Lien; Supreme court; Lease; Personal property; Business; Debtor; Obligation; Law and economics; Law; Appeal; Database transaction; Statute; Payment; Creditor; Debt; Economics; Finance; Property (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.15335313374331339,"score_gpt":0.4275052391118686,"score_spread":0.2741521053685552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298861215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068839915,0.00076894456,0.024971744,0.016625948,0.0004017017,0.0002333002,0.0005365861,0.00017885207,0.88744307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86181074,0.00043086382,0.010062997,0.007804067,0.00028005976,0.00020377405,0.00019943004,0.0000816976,0.11912639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930363,0.00069242204,0.000529815,0.0011873378,0.0027010916,0.0018530017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949961,0.001355666,0.0003417356,0.0014586344,0.001469359,0.00037852972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042530904,0.0004974989,0.000607609,0.0008719915,0.0040701707,0.006996961,0.001820935,0.007882783,0.011136229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010668594,0.0009734237,0.000899761,0.00063898345,0.010532858,0.006118282,0.0038257572,0.006229806,0.0022332498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022867478,0.000019236597,0.00062678556,0.000020967334,0.000004931776,0.00042516878,0.0007904678,0.00023954823,0.0006100068,0.98646265,0.006500717,0.004276612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014313062,0.0002470507,0.0060481643,0.0004506578,0.000084648076,0.0023872238,0.0020791527,0.0026894382,0.0051176306,0.59025234,0.39032927,0.00017124969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087977774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12029206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087977774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057224687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015272369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17493135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299386796","doi":"","title":"Mental distress and punitive damages for Breach of contract in the supreme Court of Canada: Here´s the remedy, but Where`s the right?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of business law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Damages; Breach of contract; Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01814942003886001,"score_gpt":0.28189528210765485,"score_spread":0.26374586206879486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299386796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5758026,0.0057222405,0.00070730184,0.27098516,0.0007711812,0.00012180036,0.00061277166,0.00003078999,0.1452461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735779,0.0011136547,0.00018533882,0.014699247,0.00013137893,0.00001776944,0.000062532556,0.000008939638,0.010203299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265665,0.0007078223,0.0002010485,0.00040228837,0.0017538246,0.004278325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98722166,0.004032264,0.0012959078,0.0003278006,0.0040784455,0.0030439564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003932541,0.0003799115,0.00078048796,0.0015853748,0.019316457,0.008020279,0.0031864522,0.014182143,0.009255158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03228919,0.0006122952,0.00072815653,0.0027361014,0.0121759325,0.0025045706,0.0036677194,0.0127769,0.00027212556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033718,0.0003008638,0.081403345,0.00018482796,0.0002371582,0.0029288158,0.026637293,0.0028812538,0.0005256644,0.72267604,0.13135333,0.030534275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006458075,0.00019247556,0.3684457,0.0017768068,0.0013155055,0.0016739328,0.10242869,0.011519029,0.0015460722,0.30912322,0.20024121,0.0010915492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99085367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09765971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09765971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21498522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70857406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300086060","doi":"10.71781/1957","title":"L'exception de non-subrogation: l'influence de ses principes justificatifs sur sa mise en oeuvre","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Subrogation; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.005305410966912002,"score_gpt":0.2089813696684915,"score_spread":0.2036759587015795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300086060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061547626,0.008691254,0.04783339,0.107671686,0.0015745267,0.000078390316,0.000059027883,0.00012774768,0.7724164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94067156,0.0015041301,0.0042901463,0.008694206,0.00048549677,0.00010605847,0.0000163209,0.00012681483,0.04410516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98049325,0.010148054,0.0007135821,0.0026269702,0.004197448,0.0018206845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98470205,0.0090197055,0.0015300682,0.0015784918,0.0024465148,0.0007230874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0132733695,0.0004661888,0.00063809095,0.00084554707,0.008376693,0.015094595,0.002198164,0.005003103,0.004098652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024128258,0.0003250554,0.0006274655,0.0007964119,0.03379349,0.007467988,0.0052637053,0.010800726,0.00092001643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009612624,0.0000028070997,0.00016253887,0.000017347631,0.0000028490053,0.000046942805,0.005392506,0.00008155612,0.00005286722,0.99048483,0.0016441108,0.0021020006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002041599,0.0000449212,0.0013180266,0.0004930494,0.000024885423,0.00018988944,0.010533705,0.00074999157,0.0007123928,0.7441258,0.24173345,0.000053463147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012366203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014976412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015094595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007979735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010459867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070197165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300938337","doi":"10.59962/9780774817349-006","title":"Power, Discretion, and Vulnerability: Justice Wilson and Fiduciary Duty in the Corporate/Commercial Context","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Duty; Supreme court; Dissenting opinion; Obligation; Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Discretion; Corporate law; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.030448455306755984,"score_gpt":0.2320085089642229,"score_spread":0.2015600536574669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300938337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048701134,0.030628514,0.0033339935,0.07274692,0.000536715,0.000025917714,0.000021848979,0.00002606657,0.8439789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88828,0.0044288603,0.0009429561,0.008486431,0.0003559607,0.00003517712,0.000008810029,0.000032502507,0.097429216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763775,0.0011381519,0.000040439263,0.00017915362,0.0005662166,0.00043836108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987581,0.0008071155,0.00008127142,0.0000631781,0.00011306686,0.00017723448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019061791,0.0003094589,0.0003221735,0.0009796073,0.009891468,0.0083115995,0.00078171014,0.0033144571,0.002334323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028237752,0.00023817626,0.00016575927,0.0010701,0.034806505,0.005285178,0.0036798462,0.003837533,0.00027384853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031435607,0.000008327641,0.000142867,0.000011473627,9.5236567e-7,0.00013143348,0.010786877,0.0000725094,0.00004600726,0.97493297,0.00843732,0.0054261135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067934398,0.000011152152,0.0010355895,0.00020737265,0.0000047016183,0.0002415224,0.014945844,0.00028298484,0.00012817021,0.74815816,0.23495781,0.000019873372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055229645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12742998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94477034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012150409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073182047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10981631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301190396","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 2004-2005 Term","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Adjudication; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Deference; Original jurisdiction; Standard of review; Certiorari; Administrative law","score_opus":0.04913859041513848,"score_gpt":0.30516102541321505,"score_spread":0.2560224349980766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301190396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081102185,0.11166083,0.0049560084,0.18675172,0.008226187,0.00023891298,0.0008125244,0.00019019016,0.6060615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6284692,0.023532659,0.008149361,0.086113006,0.0017750214,0.00019838456,0.00052897225,0.000078328674,0.25115502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868688,0.00090818276,0.00064909476,0.00088279747,0.008038959,0.0026522179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888065,0.0020970614,0.00080465816,0.00028873037,0.005757193,0.0022458837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071197427,0.0004281527,0.00040938848,0.0037332503,0.018870067,0.01959592,0.0030745072,0.010302532,0.0036200995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014282673,0.000627212,0.00068708067,0.00418813,0.014842689,0.0032561633,0.0040396065,0.0085819755,0.0005465538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032786178,0.00005394923,0.0020901419,0.0001778018,0.000012743722,0.00078530225,0.008938658,0.0005396444,0.000869402,0.8465912,0.105854094,0.0340543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076200645,0.000034909746,0.008746802,0.00030838329,0.000014196417,0.00020916726,0.002462538,0.00018385875,0.00040464883,0.0064376704,0.9811396,0.000050670304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96232986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22470452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22470452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18422066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89923286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301535346","doi":"","title":"Vie privée et droits fondamentaux. Étude de la protection de la vie privée en droit constitutionnel canadien et américain et en droit international (A.-R.Nadeau).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.013843278216526861,"score_gpt":0.29530969763691384,"score_spread":0.28146641942038697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301535346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031257924,0.32009295,0.0022219042,0.09950494,0.0017950791,0.00003775778,0.0010423494,0.00003609882,0.54401094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72388035,0.12424463,0.0024937955,0.00831576,0.0012880892,0.00016767948,0.00046995087,0.000039130224,0.13910055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997572,0.000873653,0.00010595951,0.00024145811,0.00082733325,0.00037963837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981482,0.0009856179,0.00030246418,0.000116751646,0.0003306905,0.000116351504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021688445,0.0003889639,0.0003544529,0.0021758894,0.0036398964,0.004877155,0.00080323627,0.0037176951,0.008642515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006301509,0.0003000311,0.0003239778,0.0036452527,0.0069376365,0.0030289995,0.0021746836,0.003395102,0.00058450474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017236065,0.000018529588,0.0015925956,0.00010562248,0.000008984386,0.00008610575,0.0036694873,0.00033483564,0.00007985945,0.9530475,0.018173067,0.02286613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018044111,0.000029104904,0.023297507,0.0012214567,0.000014845836,0.0003361188,0.0054757036,0.00031008275,0.0001909104,0.16293931,0.8061285,0.000038387196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17899549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21435237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009114356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009960723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35590726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301624333","doi":"","title":"The Uncertain Scope of Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Scope (computer science); Dismissal; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Law and economics; Malice; Economics; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.008767333308426961,"score_gpt":0.25566844088211654,"score_spread":0.24690110757368958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301624333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75126094,0.0064136665,0.0008897571,0.03070703,0.00009610018,0.00019002249,0.0017133744,0.0000259712,0.20870313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810114,0.0047658263,0.00061117223,0.0022795917,0.000026439186,0.000027147813,0.00042574553,0.000029309784,0.010823378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437016,0.00073066546,0.00017455748,0.00043331014,0.002209672,0.0020815497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98404664,0.00659138,0.0012115787,0.00041469277,0.0062014516,0.0015342572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037648827,0.00043451224,0.0008897756,0.004769366,0.022548346,0.009428105,0.0029145358,0.0026838165,0.0043464596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014934264,0.0005324439,0.000629413,0.009707005,0.00800708,0.0023425694,0.0030591849,0.003472418,0.000376677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000509322,0.00047328175,0.20900765,0.00088161667,0.00024947664,0.008669537,0.29416457,0.0059522106,0.001849765,0.31788474,0.088201955,0.07215598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093453935,0.00008904588,0.21277289,0.0017770104,0.00023714484,0.0008852933,0.49949744,0.006632941,0.0008288705,0.024865078,0.25193924,0.00038157924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99917907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19488159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19488159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16839807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9338232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302041313","doi":"","title":"Compound Interest and Gain-Based Damages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Supreme court; Breach of contract; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.03780142515198675,"score_gpt":0.2989679303668986,"score_spread":0.26116650521491186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302041313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05520264,0.005720046,0.028538454,0.028012527,0.0006628605,0.00022806201,0.00056935713,0.00008695368,0.88097906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89615417,0.0013758888,0.0042796214,0.010091083,0.00057246775,0.00021726353,0.00015833972,0.00003308508,0.0871181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99199015,0.0013707313,0.0003555201,0.0012449173,0.003671853,0.0013668699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966421,0.0015443993,0.00032398856,0.00056910416,0.00072334474,0.00019703592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00462925,0.0006905487,0.0008165739,0.0013979179,0.0043727374,0.0069867996,0.001746772,0.01125267,0.0120837465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012866109,0.00062254164,0.00095090433,0.0010500092,0.013248412,0.0078045675,0.0045682904,0.008377514,0.0011879485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013947043,0.000009260861,0.00025004,0.000011938085,0.000006310349,0.000105851504,0.00019275345,0.0001697007,0.00007687374,0.9946742,0.002762865,0.001726202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053601394,0.00007895578,0.0025383988,0.00011586384,0.000037719983,0.0006146089,0.00042317642,0.0012779535,0.00054193736,0.9120359,0.08222066,0.000061230945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029695546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05025467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029695546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006972969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054178913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059045374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303229060","doi":"","title":"Workshop Presentations: Directors' and Officers' Liability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Corporation; Liability; Proposition; Third party; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Internet privacy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018355928079763693,"score_gpt":0.32534435874398565,"score_spread":0.30698843066422193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303229060","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01931449,0.00807879,0.005076764,0.47482714,0.11640223,0.000753461,0.0009008044,0.00024934777,0.37439692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108133905,0.0034879802,0.001412046,0.07087299,0.035328794,0.0006003585,0.0005014777,0.00015540092,0.7795071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654716,0.0010497048,0.00025475034,0.0005790824,0.0007563582,0.0008129962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942212,0.0024288737,0.0003688892,0.0003242596,0.0012119955,0.0014449058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00781678,0.0010503023,0.00057016243,0.0007956598,0.006746504,0.006037066,0.0024511607,0.020221245,0.11086224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015530105,0.0006067239,0.001290415,0.00049849646,0.0015736447,0.0030655349,0.0052385335,0.009648308,0.025855355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015633197,0.00012518716,0.000491257,0.00016314347,0.00001643292,0.0011586194,0.0014439755,0.00027767182,0.0011192854,0.023747003,0.9496839,0.021617165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038426286,0.000084924126,0.001069835,0.0002618628,0.000015763411,0.00032996215,0.0022472222,0.00020601177,0.0005115119,0.00913272,0.98606783,0.00003405991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002274879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00475093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11086224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032576353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039468706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37087113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303810331","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000021","title":"THE FAILURE OF UNIVERSAL THEORIES OF TORT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Jurisdiction; Damages; Delict; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Private law; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.017933053862165878,"score_gpt":0.29056900884041814,"score_spread":0.27263595497825227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303810331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07663942,0.013993278,0.23602147,0.18284553,0.0015906184,0.000253007,0.00063667924,0.00091042405,0.4871096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623985,0.0040759956,0.016970452,0.007389866,0.0015119548,0.00022536753,0.0001678928,0.00013457464,0.007125352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.980735,0.008564725,0.0008083458,0.0026184786,0.005852888,0.0014205459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9320342,0.03900552,0.0055764937,0.01254162,0.008795218,0.0020469113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023754671,0.0013342242,0.0022334568,0.0068504056,0.0038506782,0.008057642,0.0063645258,0.0060838885,0.008863962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048801184,0.0011564256,0.0023210172,0.0022443528,0.048638165,0.020360311,0.008171674,0.010784475,0.001538079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006827922,0.000018303721,0.00032334,0.000049902934,0.000016054486,0.000028713304,0.00025520628,0.00061614724,0.000014530062,0.99412656,0.0012273534,0.0033171426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000815822,0.0000075392873,0.00020711559,0.000059761,0.000006253102,0.00003821124,0.00017694429,0.0013374409,0.000026157244,0.99519324,0.0029320212,0.0000070600818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052769543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003587594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023754671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008044443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005243436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12562823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304059494","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511779213.002","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0220966383001875,"score_gpt":0.2297745826476385,"score_spread":0.20767794434745102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304059494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000386716,0.0034862212,0.0010722158,0.004317385,0.004273107,0.0000552729,0.0007966394,0.00020150404,0.98541105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003806926,0.0028580553,0.0008746102,0.0023603973,0.00095393194,0.00006019779,0.0009287852,0.00017705774,0.98797995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992454,0.000111388734,0.000033986358,0.00017867576,0.00034270316,0.00008789836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999482,0.000094430696,0.000026559916,0.00006913786,0.00022835947,0.00009949274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048242,0.0006673606,0.00045407712,0.0010579192,0.002208036,0.0051755966,0.0012318275,0.0019750644,0.36267704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021765025,0.00023216185,0.0004196037,0.0012391489,0.0010401417,0.0038411147,0.0025578898,0.0021968526,0.20790988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018007722,0.000026868096,0.00014479972,0.00015544138,0.0000021979172,0.00008773255,0.0007092491,0.00006673538,0.00014219093,0.08398752,0.82209724,0.092561945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.5691156e-7,0.0000030614106,0.00006519699,0.00006628567,4.0123166e-7,0.000032543157,0.00011220458,0.000008885983,0.000015750506,0.0023910843,0.9973024,0.0000014576917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030250496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041963877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36267704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021325215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020918238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9090639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304873221","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1490","title":"Symposium: It's All in the Game: A Nonfoundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication, by Allan Hutchinson","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Jurisprudence; Law; Foundationalism; Reputation; Political science; Philosophy of law; Common law; Tort; Wright; Comparative law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; History; Art history; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027790409522209555,"score_gpt":0.32649187793486717,"score_spread":0.2987014684126576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304873221","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014964268,0.43175742,0.00082273455,0.5115577,0.021530304,0.000012841677,0.000047615704,0.000020548983,0.032754388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11296355,0.42846957,0.0019672741,0.25290793,0.078293286,0.00013473682,0.0001412062,0.00013939604,0.12498303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985964,0.00071513985,0.000043389762,0.00014067846,0.00041162188,0.000092819944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699783,0.0018644807,0.00021086079,0.000087862056,0.00062442245,0.00021450188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023644993,0.0005051021,0.00050794444,0.0015023156,0.003939855,0.0062387157,0.0010875014,0.002976129,0.0037497878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006138502,0.00033861154,0.0003206212,0.0019734032,0.0064788456,0.007659435,0.0014477624,0.0039886,0.0007925184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020277186,0.000012510451,0.00024133103,0.00022104784,0.000013242091,0.00006662706,0.0014670828,0.0001023596,0.00008241227,0.11674113,0.8606903,0.020341584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012106098,0.000012685764,0.0009719461,0.0008459935,0.000016578018,0.000079199956,0.0015033274,0.00013959606,0.00008605341,0.088067144,0.9082504,0.000014937935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02095344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038173933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02095344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069275745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008983492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050263345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305326407","doi":"","title":"The Deed Not the Motive: Fiduciary Law Without Loyalty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Loyalty; Law; Deed; Principal (computer security); Duty of care; Commercial law; Law and economics; Business; Corporate law; Trust law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.013200093831946352,"score_gpt":0.2979046797508274,"score_spread":0.28470458591888104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305326407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035640635,0.0036007627,0.05486043,0.121209994,0.0015505293,0.00006977398,0.000088648,0.00009139293,0.78288776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86442506,0.0014551484,0.0056018103,0.03529165,0.001274346,0.00016337799,0.000048288635,0.00010845481,0.09163181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468106,0.0018228184,0.00020726105,0.0010019494,0.0013473576,0.0009395153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958093,0.0020825595,0.00044553925,0.0006954925,0.0006449278,0.00032222673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005439205,0.00028369043,0.0005640832,0.0007085155,0.0053548017,0.007669231,0.0012780093,0.0073957327,0.0069582877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011578367,0.00032108647,0.0006202973,0.0006942459,0.026196739,0.01044905,0.0044407775,0.009502646,0.0016531551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015634788,0.0000025742625,0.00005371216,0.000003045059,5.6232494e-7,0.0000110022265,0.0001562081,0.000015607417,0.000009779677,0.99790406,0.0011401563,0.0007017322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000125139395,0.000024547788,0.00035531647,0.00008042157,0.00000624365,0.00013539528,0.00053277705,0.00046251403,0.00014694146,0.91517866,0.08304899,0.000015621985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005759132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060307607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007669231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038737361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004741992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028765619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309628782","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1084","title":"Book Notes: Electronic Consumer Contracts in the Conflict of Laws, by Zheng Sophia Tang","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04994684942052247,"score_gpt":0.3033877134124054,"score_spread":0.2534408639918829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309628782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059917867,0.06212048,0.0058065783,0.20252366,0.008154054,0.00008416892,0.000518451,0.00016931085,0.71463156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062889785,0.036237728,0.0034274547,0.031531397,0.0035200466,0.00011316929,0.0002909434,0.00010123207,0.86188823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997583,0.000057240868,0.000011405792,0.0000370386,0.00011613069,0.000019937484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959666,0.00023696182,0.000025357194,0.000015017709,0.0001051271,0.000020851972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042170772,0.00026360652,0.00022393353,0.00067315943,0.0016838441,0.0016613891,0.0003044365,0.0008743031,0.01585036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016738,0.00021119435,0.00016636001,0.0014479264,0.0013194197,0.0030404674,0.0006020032,0.0012965353,0.002440484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070365936,0.000008641096,0.00020524561,0.000045856184,0.0000027122433,0.00005848529,0.0007650362,0.00015669905,0.00010391733,0.15081498,0.8297294,0.018101996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056184185,0.000011817499,0.0011707988,0.00007244393,0.0000039092743,0.000113783186,0.0006606142,0.00023091151,0.00010637292,0.028575603,0.9690411,0.000007075966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015879484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0374112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015879484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002654756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019545606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05302477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310202944","doi":"","title":"A Common Law Tort of Privacy? The Challenges of Developing a Human Rights Tort","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Common law; Law; Jurisdiction; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Privacy laws of the United States; Information privacy law; Privacy law; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Human rights; Business; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.23338685154788982,"score_gpt":0.4036198964505998,"score_spread":0.17023304490271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310202944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030850476,0.017920379,0.06378967,0.6278913,0.0013550444,0.00017864793,0.00007053412,0.00007693069,0.257867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8276849,0.017489122,0.044542603,0.07152629,0.0020860594,0.00029999818,0.00007302516,0.000090094094,0.03620789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796728,0.010244215,0.0008957029,0.0018276661,0.005426282,0.0019333311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97558415,0.016905876,0.0014401054,0.0022861294,0.0025781023,0.0012056583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030848883,0.00048074243,0.0010973455,0.0020242513,0.00926698,0.015754336,0.003057936,0.016689954,0.0029246383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03454125,0.000718686,0.0013435762,0.0015704796,0.07324126,0.022581547,0.008375993,0.016689453,0.0006415809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010247334,0.000005009112,0.000042171487,0.000010138003,0.0000012529482,0.000032855434,0.0008456749,0.000118339536,0.000022272117,0.99654466,0.00084015756,0.0015365117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126877885,0.000030248826,0.00031759246,0.0002919931,0.000008562837,0.00018934782,0.0022566817,0.0007139768,0.00016271281,0.90339404,0.09259568,0.000026532718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071570665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041402515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071570665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019198103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030006303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16314638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312918544","doi":"10.1017/s0008197315000112","title":"GOOD FAITH PERFORMANCE IN CANADIAN CONTRACT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Faith; Honesty; Good faith; Obligation; Fair dealing; Bad faith; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Commonwealth; Political science; Corporation; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Theology; History","score_opus":0.0343651089007624,"score_gpt":0.29227942069292556,"score_spread":0.2579143117921632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312918544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019731985,0.004890295,0.002772239,0.041505028,0.00089345744,0.00014285887,0.0003673028,0.00008466514,0.92961216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56938285,0.0043148035,0.0047085513,0.030115407,0.00028085022,0.00016233404,0.0003229223,0.000118894066,0.3905933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906096,0.0009860306,0.00024199915,0.0011341623,0.0044777654,0.0025505295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562883,0.00084154075,0.00015363687,0.00023991893,0.0022675428,0.00086854893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057268487,0.00056908716,0.00034712997,0.0019494578,0.029811969,0.009394126,0.0020451634,0.006760357,0.014632319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013414326,0.0007025379,0.00060700095,0.0029812,0.01152835,0.0036002572,0.0042845327,0.0088398615,0.0014398544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010063476,0.00001069258,0.0006571764,0.000027126463,0.0000031547638,0.00015732078,0.0040106834,0.00017366078,0.00007773229,0.94711566,0.037826624,0.009930164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020534184,0.000028136474,0.0069767106,0.00020161853,0.000016894695,0.00022214385,0.0031124807,0.00090223533,0.00024975993,0.06360992,0.9245158,0.0001437736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98487884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9872082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11436619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11436619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13802187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8297887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314348269","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007055","title":"Gerry Johnstone, Restorative Justice. Ideas, Values and Debates.Cullompton, UK, Willan Publishing, 2002, 190 pages.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Restorative justice; Criminology; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027860018777105783,"score_gpt":0.2719274624969068,"score_spread":0.24406744371980102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314348269","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003052318,0.9330591,0.0007742965,0.040059723,0.0022442802,0.000025994606,0.00023373716,0.00006824628,0.023229374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010997123,0.87979937,0.0020153953,0.01129775,0.0020144847,0.00009372963,0.00026601585,0.000188794,0.09332721],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854004,0.00042259088,0.00012981713,0.00014365924,0.0006224599,0.00014141717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965848,0.0018590963,0.00025575122,0.00012568978,0.0008731144,0.00030150756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023115715,0.0017015289,0.0012779369,0.0043860436,0.0034988653,0.0055354666,0.0020504948,0.005485985,0.031544264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005468341,0.0013425,0.00054384326,0.005639504,0.0040897145,0.010097705,0.002180104,0.004760167,0.014386756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032424192,0.00002213028,0.00024263265,0.0011027174,0.000021683663,0.00012349119,0.0023917542,0.0000792419,0.00011400632,0.019813312,0.90837276,0.06768391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001283153,0.000009754194,0.0025133197,0.0025846227,0.000019941965,0.00033721875,0.0030319602,0.00005881455,0.00020471189,0.026098631,0.965102,0.000026102978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048772592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.129144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048772592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045096385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065912106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10552609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315208986","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.619","title":"R. Brownsword /N.J. Hird /G. Howells (eds.), Good Faith in Contract - Concept and Context, Aldershot, Dartmouth - Ashgate , 1999, pp. 326.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Faith; Good faith; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01965605918304419,"score_gpt":0.2897990723030501,"score_spread":0.2701430131200059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315208986","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004959622,0.86752254,0.0012691801,0.04071623,0.0022110904,0.00003063449,0.00036860752,0.000055386838,0.08733038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008875564,0.87839234,0.0016766407,0.0039994465,0.0013356615,0.000053137886,0.00043173184,0.000090361376,0.10514527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778867,0.0006390717,0.00014018608,0.00023543295,0.0010572777,0.00013927645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647504,0.001818756,0.00038546763,0.00012503077,0.0008684435,0.00032724606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025803335,0.0008254243,0.0007835761,0.003448922,0.0016017555,0.004767173,0.00094084797,0.0029295594,0.04825099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005923186,0.00070529565,0.00037064604,0.006565049,0.0025951786,0.006789536,0.001388909,0.0021044863,0.027701072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012986073,0.000014784651,0.0003372778,0.0008130081,0.000009035427,0.000046047397,0.0006925678,0.000096753334,0.000058975947,0.018874798,0.8367622,0.14228164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000481678,0.000007927287,0.0017651013,0.0018600067,0.000009297222,0.00013120071,0.0009329565,0.000042534313,0.000063543586,0.012705573,0.9824645,0.000012551196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03768661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06669074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04825099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039662314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007307813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1614157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317693644","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal governance in Supreme Court of Canada cases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kansai Daigaku hōgaku ronshū","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.011798550717944657,"score_gpt":0.29585642235000337,"score_spread":0.2840578716320587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317693644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33478492,0.0046132407,0.0014443445,0.041435372,0.0004058889,0.000281521,0.00047992874,0.00007738334,0.61647743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181163,0.0016464527,0.0010835588,0.008451986,0.00011657324,0.00012623482,0.000106497435,0.000043096494,0.07030944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98923945,0.0011801574,0.00021515039,0.0007479411,0.0025441335,0.006073233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906617,0.0037261238,0.00042960123,0.00038564517,0.0028734852,0.001923445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062370077,0.00048178816,0.00080946315,0.002429647,0.043123312,0.016840445,0.0040138448,0.011097197,0.0074875513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017957108,0.00095099676,0.00071621704,0.00478186,0.011618693,0.002398914,0.0048850044,0.010135032,0.00042916345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000825208,0.000068213056,0.0077953697,0.00009142193,0.00007192925,0.0017134398,0.031735275,0.00094802544,0.00033662945,0.8948823,0.05276615,0.009508785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026262703,0.000105438434,0.06238933,0.0011908364,0.00072293176,0.0007641359,0.12166803,0.0058329985,0.0021576788,0.19927444,0.60514903,0.00048246447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98484725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09353626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09353626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1817008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6786562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317953680","doi":"","title":"Economic Interests in Canadian Tort Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Tort; Fiduciary; Law; Context (archaeology); Economic analysis; Duty; Delict; Liability; Cause of action; Law and economics; Common law; Economic law; Contributory negligence; Political science; Economics; Private law; Plaintiff; Comparative law; Black letter law; History","score_opus":0.009329313571650273,"score_gpt":0.29865588579407515,"score_spread":0.28932657222242486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317953680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040369392,0.015184735,0.0011613005,0.036445163,0.0007563366,0.000047013385,0.00026595328,0.000040869392,0.94206166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3998264,0.050005846,0.004249262,0.020843454,0.0008965784,0.0001414416,0.00054246857,0.00011343854,0.52338105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531823,0.0003309097,0.0000703849,0.00022378688,0.002746428,0.0013102244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849033,0.00031650046,0.000069524205,0.00006580549,0.00080158014,0.00025626834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019319308,0.00063270953,0.00045574992,0.0041607697,0.016753098,0.00983819,0.001699337,0.0038196868,0.014653517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004375364,0.00044275183,0.00058656465,0.004986257,0.012634933,0.0029604295,0.0026239643,0.004133962,0.0012383242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028244042,0.0000039409115,0.0001869527,0.00002614052,0.0000016864708,0.00005221136,0.0013099961,0.00018682866,0.000024970972,0.93639076,0.052817803,0.008995842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044138296,0.0000033149513,0.0017095673,0.0001804179,0.000007858791,0.0000649756,0.0011437669,0.00029607513,0.000040687726,0.0742312,0.92229176,0.00002592339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98454756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13912639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13912639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12856291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318102869","doi":"10.1093/tandt/tts117","title":"Recent developments in Canada in the areas of trusts and estates law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law; Certainty; Government (linguistics); Administration (probate law); Trust law; Jurisdiction; Probate; Political science; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.027393548101161333,"score_gpt":0.2891953846663348,"score_spread":0.2618018365651735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318102869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048346516,0.115049995,0.002275889,0.5345016,0.005742984,0.000106233456,0.0018330227,0.00022941043,0.29191434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5275776,0.1437905,0.008831411,0.10709376,0.0021763402,0.000068554145,0.0014988941,0.0001590858,0.20880394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871178,0.0008761861,0.00038966624,0.00089128444,0.007141858,0.003583292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676645,0.0039915354,0.0019915344,0.000513648,0.016362391,0.009476444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005213061,0.00040412092,0.000558596,0.004150077,0.016568266,0.015321239,0.0020960993,0.005098091,0.012760622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014397457,0.00054683414,0.0007697087,0.011554102,0.011236362,0.0035613477,0.0031277079,0.006088818,0.0008479381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009169661,0.00010723752,0.01941846,0.0009726332,0.000054403725,0.0015533908,0.0116739925,0.0013381146,0.00080168236,0.47775492,0.35964575,0.1265877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015319367,0.000022161354,0.034746174,0.0004904262,0.0000305855,0.00027688898,0.0070505254,0.00043641502,0.00017945982,0.006794788,0.9498674,0.00008974493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27587873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27587873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41505837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.839878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320688161","doi":"10.5623/cig2014-002","title":"The Duty to Consult and Accommodate Aboriginal Peoples: A Primer for Ontario Surveyors Working in Resources Development","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Government (linguistics); Natural resource; Treaty; Law; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.023228090853458592,"score_gpt":0.31221181315309976,"score_spread":0.28898372229964114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320688161","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036403928,0.019443834,0.011868792,0.7678721,0.0023868417,0.00097147987,0.00027495483,0.00012457221,0.16065349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5002501,0.035814617,0.035688017,0.13158965,0.0007975213,0.0027536917,0.0002475193,0.00025242427,0.29260647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859746,0.005279784,0.00084864243,0.00055960566,0.0035243651,0.0038130013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821307,0.0076925745,0.0010317478,0.00044556972,0.005012119,0.0036872737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021193573,0.0004992185,0.0005334545,0.0022091507,0.042033665,0.01015533,0.004077731,0.011952428,0.0051928256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018989565,0.001242528,0.00058156345,0.0040726108,0.030234845,0.007629426,0.007915185,0.009022714,0.00077339157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019394223,0.00006121266,0.0075903186,0.0004392332,0.0000076148026,0.0010558746,0.59749025,0.00015007412,0.000901689,0.1988021,0.15241274,0.041069403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008876139,0.000026437136,0.008961673,0.00089703046,0.000009909266,0.0003029084,0.24729772,0.00011843343,0.00013769645,0.009775,0.73238647,0.000077849036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9663982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99117297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10200597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10200597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3445844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7401086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321524221","doi":"10.1093/tandt/tts097","title":"Residence of a Trust: Fundy Settlement v Canada 2012 SCC 14","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Settlement (finance); Convention; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Demography; Finance; Payment","score_opus":0.029273117073587568,"score_gpt":0.3080845223451236,"score_spread":0.27881140527153603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321524221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20974635,0.0027739203,0.001860608,0.071511,0.000672275,0.00022148536,0.0015504844,0.0001043598,0.7115595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7490567,0.0011830858,0.0007246237,0.026620634,0.00012561887,0.00008353477,0.000311339,0.000043511907,0.22185092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657494,0.00020192699,0.00009502293,0.00027595172,0.0011039732,0.0017480785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804115,0.00036568008,0.00012388287,0.00007952722,0.0008723763,0.0005173871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016936767,0.0002993271,0.00033400973,0.00080088637,0.015209311,0.005364095,0.0014735674,0.0065006437,0.007291748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00680779,0.00046421945,0.0005753129,0.0010720325,0.0029395728,0.0012577041,0.0020865132,0.0050570345,0.0006989344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017630306,0.000057979996,0.020228982,0.00015179589,0.00005595608,0.005773304,0.014225573,0.00073127035,0.001224589,0.6181978,0.31578273,0.023393651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017254065,0.00009348354,0.0419804,0.00051573693,0.0002417699,0.0016724464,0.017544786,0.0014425806,0.0026772579,0.020440554,0.9129451,0.00027342245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97920233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042691164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.092331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30974752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322455497","doi":"10.2307/3504948","title":"10.2307/3504948","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Liability; Criminal liability; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Criminal law; Political science; Politics; Social science; Public law","score_opus":0.011078781760355644,"score_gpt":0.24298436823929986,"score_spread":0.23190558647894421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322455497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030297379,0.00037613412,0.0004587201,0.00031348114,0.00038096058,0.000053271793,0.0010506824,0.00073206995,0.9963319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010995605,0.0003827919,0.00054628693,0.0004241159,0.000102919905,0.000038634957,0.0015054996,0.00042446185,0.9954757],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933296,0.000059665257,0.000053293476,0.00018558581,0.00026888456,0.00009958033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977981,0.0004941015,0.00009063271,0.00042058685,0.000536903,0.00065967115],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091422163,0.001691837,0.001239878,0.0024393478,0.0017723258,0.0053382483,0.0020398544,0.0028138435,0.9845509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023335856,0.0008139407,0.0008081745,0.0029077774,0.0018012748,0.006145529,0.0043991664,0.0017532578,0.98541707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015995468,0.00014620025,0.00043121714,0.00040492936,0.000014707069,0.00017674091,0.00008761585,0.00016136089,0.0013893725,0.0067334645,0.57100445,0.41929004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022592452,0.000032171225,0.00066477776,0.00017128827,0.0000062095305,0.00019171015,0.00011204696,0.00010967793,0.00019880914,0.0012927422,0.9971835,0.0000143750385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038248962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039042265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015449107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012004783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014435422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022036254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322706132","doi":"10.1086/682556","title":": <i>Thomas Browne</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"History; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05983394968148842,"score_gpt":0.33162072634653983,"score_spread":0.2717867766650514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322706132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064278714,0.030100208,0.002445803,0.48970982,0.07338075,0.00011584118,0.0014460023,0.0016008992,0.40055788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005714793,0.010856134,0.0007942165,0.07760358,0.0095475465,0.0000791113,0.00044999865,0.0011575337,0.89379716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844164,0.00036477472,0.00007033507,0.00028249715,0.0006946931,0.00014596911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949622,0.0014235161,0.0002455299,0.00020265387,0.0022965213,0.000869632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022084792,0.0009874104,0.0008664288,0.0016700736,0.003999651,0.0042449962,0.0011821565,0.0029506064,0.19478048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013682199,0.00038938795,0.00036562243,0.0013425574,0.0013039421,0.004970811,0.00248331,0.0049466267,0.17893274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017552325,0.00000120667,0.000017415043,0.000016260496,4.0183934e-7,0.0000069154044,0.000068632464,0.0000025533611,0.000020961525,0.0010557366,0.99633276,0.0024752866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011531212,0.0000018310435,0.00012349282,0.00005853065,0.0000010182355,0.000043843953,0.00027016926,0.000010727724,0.00006841628,0.0005493797,0.9988661,0.000005416285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015206163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028651966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19478048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002507279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002029841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6516056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323832375","doi":"10.1142/9789812778857_0006","title":"LOGARITHMIC FUNCTIONAL AND THE WEIL RECIPROCITY LAW","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Reciprocity law; Logarithm; Mathematical economics; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematical analysis; Pure mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.026275499484584377,"score_gpt":0.3013622496571425,"score_spread":0.2750867501725581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323832375","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09788442,0.006991402,0.43540132,0.033817288,0.00078014506,0.00008277859,0.0007414651,0.00037138243,0.4239299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111301,0.003785094,0.030368768,0.0018810157,0.0012736949,0.00022886237,0.0002417688,0.00014830762,0.050942387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975568,0.001109054,0.00009480863,0.0003147178,0.0006846427,0.00023996734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354905,0.004277635,0.00043047915,0.00072336354,0.00069894525,0.0003205417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045258272,0.0005804194,0.0009820749,0.0019715924,0.0018046277,0.003397182,0.0010304791,0.002336914,0.00987068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015505736,0.00033625308,0.00074086175,0.0017653385,0.0067200633,0.008907383,0.0023892666,0.0032936023,0.0014723284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037490481,0.0000028532788,0.000036593647,0.000005977242,0.0000012114864,0.0000067323895,0.000017570637,0.0002943776,0.000025464924,0.99775994,0.00061129255,0.0012341574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048264387,0.0000025714726,0.000045289435,0.0000040309947,0.0000011071214,0.000015448593,0.0000069890407,0.0011187874,0.000023446852,0.9967656,0.0020087217,0.0000031133281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001500892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007286338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00987068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026081782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017392137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033020735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331299321","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgt008","title":"Incommensurability, proportionality, and defeasibility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028058117910048756,"score_gpt":0.29236658936569543,"score_spread":0.2643084714556467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331299321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2340843,0.0031308094,0.31320757,0.02101369,0.00039042873,0.000295373,0.00014152055,0.00016083353,0.42757547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816745,0.00029064197,0.014696776,0.00051572704,0.00008417704,0.000120363635,0.000031426567,0.000021555392,0.0025649702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702048,0.016263,0.0017871864,0.0036384095,0.006570636,0.00153604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95836586,0.025564207,0.0068691736,0.0055988585,0.0024460184,0.0011558824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018694898,0.00083054625,0.00088196865,0.002780564,0.003384819,0.009283872,0.0016274623,0.0027675207,0.0061606364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056743596,0.0004989302,0.0012372896,0.002333569,0.038509056,0.011167637,0.0079369685,0.0044344426,0.00044882463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013466767,0.00001727931,0.0007715996,0.000035043584,0.00002216734,0.000051756248,0.00091951195,0.00032333468,0.00010444576,0.991951,0.00018989803,0.0056005097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068455415,0.00002040809,0.00055834715,0.000033232012,0.000009155543,0.00008627697,0.00033524339,0.0006625616,0.0001586147,0.9955102,0.0026106902,0.000008395632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010322615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077243877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018694898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004369867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023728262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098869205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336534342","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.9","title":"Realising the Public Potential of Corporate Law: Twenty Years of Civil Penalty Enforcement in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Fiduciary; Public law; Corporate law; Private law; Commercial law; Corporate governance; Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Enforcement; Corporate group; Municipal law; Administrative law; Political science; Comparative law; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.0817171552472051,"score_gpt":0.3426131843189589,"score_spread":0.2608960290717538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336534342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5918462,0.032890245,0.0026761985,0.25981578,0.0016354001,0.00016386122,0.00003904231,0.0000315847,0.11090152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96173394,0.008067375,0.0007603853,0.014148602,0.0004845829,0.000034118002,0.000009366153,0.00002015744,0.0147414245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98801893,0.0047489055,0.00050790963,0.0010148147,0.0037864735,0.0019230205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646376,0.020807756,0.003974529,0.0014979859,0.004924643,0.0041575916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018476255,0.00020166876,0.00043220917,0.002156993,0.010948744,0.013569692,0.0014558973,0.009775241,0.0038285477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024691993,0.0007991913,0.00048580853,0.0015873603,0.022992292,0.008004524,0.008320593,0.012367622,0.00032933193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010947529,0.0005620026,0.011137775,0.0009798667,0.000048798905,0.0050340244,0.3690244,0.00090307347,0.0024976798,0.4835889,0.016831048,0.10928287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037355232,0.00053707755,0.08940594,0.0035915682,0.00005486236,0.0011755411,0.10338694,0.002674268,0.0017921998,0.051834386,0.7452706,0.00023923302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09023125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16484895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09023125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023221318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029978974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17941207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336886427","doi":"","title":"Mitigation, Specific Performance and the Property Developer: A Case Comment on Southcott Estates Inc. v. Toronto Catholic District School Board","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Law; Obligation; Profit (economics); Business; Rubric; Breach of contract; Political science; Damages; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01038550864635759,"score_gpt":0.2465884697626824,"score_spread":0.2362029611163248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336886427","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08404342,0.0075663556,0.0015954591,0.56325424,0.0012828367,0.00014462507,0.0003753828,0.000055103184,0.3416825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47798303,0.0039787185,0.0009659247,0.3107238,0.0013018021,0.00015475544,0.00013276696,0.000071167924,0.20468804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610496,0.00059823657,0.000096664444,0.0005662418,0.001352406,0.001281525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969885,0.0016005451,0.00016091825,0.00010741244,0.00069076155,0.00045193307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002766067,0.00065704033,0.0005920742,0.0007323557,0.027248621,0.006617336,0.0025409611,0.022210132,0.0058718594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005674628,0.00085572654,0.00082168536,0.0012819086,0.013670112,0.0022798292,0.0024445865,0.018432468,0.00064029195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004592496,0.00005343233,0.0041518183,0.000099029945,0.000033182772,0.0046895286,0.03593694,0.00057855865,0.0010519904,0.5549825,0.39360455,0.0047724694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009396263,0.0000851728,0.012603267,0.00042699187,0.00014360517,0.0013233755,0.035160046,0.0009255533,0.0014783406,0.028601164,0.91894615,0.00021230837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8199681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9269256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1800319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03276143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03469321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36218423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233723973","doi":"","title":"Building Indigenous Governance from Native Title: Moving Away from 'Fitting In' to Creating a Decolonized Space","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Business; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.019532823961770095,"score_gpt":0.29038575393883803,"score_spread":0.27085292997706795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233723973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32180843,0.004365274,0.050876502,0.036942393,0.0003821706,0.00023264837,0.000039065577,0.00014162202,0.585212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648445,0.00081754767,0.005782194,0.00134761,0.000052366555,0.00006486907,0.0000104339815,0.000031858635,0.027048597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962172,0.0016565974,0.00010312218,0.00043746328,0.0008036331,0.00078198407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967518,0.0012134139,0.00037157742,0.000606231,0.00044499166,0.0006120378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00674323,0.00016164473,0.00036828528,0.0007498472,0.0071661905,0.008357181,0.0011579059,0.0015919078,0.0030890515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00784908,0.00027834182,0.00031324173,0.00058011274,0.045886666,0.0062065367,0.009760026,0.0031593493,0.00028715288],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008015767,0.00001966244,0.0016555627,0.00007893222,0.0000057417756,0.0002283474,0.09717965,0.00032298724,0.000629976,0.87859654,0.0014874467,0.019787073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002990156,0.00015721822,0.01388332,0.0010129387,0.000031569212,0.00048256575,0.07847554,0.0017436171,0.0016431161,0.4067964,0.49565986,0.000083920924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122216694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21926132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122216694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012091724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022962162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24301064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337513776","doi":"","title":"Reasonableness as Proportionality: Towards a Better Constructive Interpretation of the Law on Searching Computers in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Proportionality (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Expectation of privacy; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.008221970926062543,"score_gpt":0.2692866171906287,"score_spread":0.26106464626456616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337513776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078561746,0.007141357,0.04027144,0.20539594,0.00054634525,0.00025975207,0.0004710033,0.00017405259,0.66717845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93671316,0.004117086,0.016309083,0.014388364,0.00018973314,0.00010585054,0.00011456475,0.000107575695,0.027954612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98441327,0.0033772532,0.0006102391,0.001316366,0.007104012,0.0031789034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867192,0.006480575,0.0006081015,0.000496773,0.004768937,0.0009264202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008298455,0.0005981954,0.0010090388,0.0042896904,0.022675684,0.02262378,0.0042715734,0.0070490283,0.0040630503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025276124,0.0006652267,0.0011193772,0.004974949,0.038996518,0.009627385,0.007063106,0.010124833,0.0002942774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039203665,0.000004693031,0.0002552129,0.000011902953,0.0000022687589,0.00007967884,0.0027209937,0.00037701224,0.00003653297,0.992415,0.002150051,0.0019426565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031046045,0.000015090431,0.0024727047,0.00025420895,0.00003624393,0.000087930624,0.008210466,0.0073886095,0.00035481155,0.88958323,0.09139475,0.0001709576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98518753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98230296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16929075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16929075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22066207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96350497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337716135","doi":"10.29173/alr434","title":"Apportionment of Damages for Contributory Negligence: The Causal Potency Criterion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Damages; Contributory negligence; Legislation; Position (finance); Law and economics; Subject matter; Law; Political science; Economics; Tort; Liability","score_opus":0.031157073183355557,"score_gpt":0.35319820348594727,"score_spread":0.32204113030259174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337716135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043668743,0.02775098,0.34649247,0.06207351,0.0010632322,0.00055656116,0.000634706,0.00015496774,0.5176049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944742,0.007698782,0.02681326,0.0043600467,0.0007679324,0.00016923893,0.000098773824,0.000039852024,0.015310118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974428,0.0073306477,0.0013859995,0.0021718333,0.013104471,0.0015789886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589977,0.028548341,0.0030291618,0.0032794336,0.0054934793,0.00065188174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021592066,0.0008167377,0.000950322,0.0063984497,0.0035418302,0.005705415,0.0025268304,0.005878836,0.0067750276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049233317,0.0006330096,0.0012889158,0.0029710622,0.020931557,0.008594781,0.0048518656,0.0051936037,0.0005096739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042506626,0.0000074749155,0.00046569877,0.00005649801,0.000014860145,0.00008392681,0.00014648798,0.0005460813,0.00005610016,0.9920527,0.00086238986,0.005703508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001912409,0.00002526437,0.0014400841,0.00018409999,0.000045252415,0.00023113564,0.00017525161,0.0012496219,0.00029458737,0.979353,0.01695399,0.000028697877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029291091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04031104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9707089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009050225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014305482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114191115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338070778","doi":"","title":"Injunctions Contra Mundum: The Ultimate Weapon in Containment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Tort; Law; Criticism; Order (exchange); Political science; Business; Liability","score_opus":0.00877383288797661,"score_gpt":0.2811958971766334,"score_spread":0.2724220642886568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338070778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030468917,0.004955104,0.09167244,0.10141075,0.0014617919,0.0002955938,0.00013889749,0.00025600867,0.7693405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8811542,0.0014733034,0.022528697,0.033692844,0.0005777779,0.00035470736,0.000047848018,0.00016057608,0.060010195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97598344,0.005617705,0.0012538126,0.0029967523,0.01045389,0.0036942542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884595,0.0058026295,0.0008318699,0.0021982978,0.00210281,0.0006048635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015031577,0.0006928886,0.0013143083,0.001955964,0.011519791,0.010385348,0.0029244993,0.012405445,0.0043167984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028650044,0.0006571737,0.0012638723,0.001110187,0.06629203,0.010706085,0.010056992,0.014859956,0.0008916321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019657523,0.0000023446407,0.00004126926,0.000005188159,0.000001278587,0.000020888232,0.00059363904,0.000030810097,0.00004284585,0.9976859,0.0006622335,0.0009115394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025604839,0.000031778,0.000415328,0.00026267982,0.000019035468,0.00021185305,0.0015007688,0.000660251,0.00062553264,0.87873197,0.117462315,0.000052906216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13560681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09228422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13560681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014021335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025547422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26963502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338421469","doi":"","title":"Dialogue between Courts and Tribunals: Essays in Administrative Law and Justice (2001-2007)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Administrative law; Sociology; Administration of justice; Public administration; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04961626847222056,"score_gpt":0.34145580343516874,"score_spread":0.2918395349629482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338421469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015349449,0.33843306,0.0017229047,0.22377282,0.025132716,0.00007867826,0.00041137665,0.00007095993,0.39502805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3169279,0.2201043,0.0023908636,0.04512887,0.016352635,0.0003553817,0.00080640044,0.00026967662,0.397664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770445,0.0010396357,0.00010051362,0.0002014361,0.00070724654,0.00024685904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379516,0.004252738,0.00043314465,0.00015816742,0.00093888264,0.00042192583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003619002,0.0007224101,0.00064482214,0.002399295,0.009278431,0.012925491,0.0012495981,0.004589372,0.005057764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011078595,0.000596832,0.00036838028,0.0053958516,0.009405327,0.0058037755,0.0031875642,0.006274601,0.00105789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027111004,0.00004630158,0.00045458146,0.00023634812,0.0000067104766,0.00009157655,0.028901702,0.00012905574,0.00007500129,0.12537436,0.81671566,0.027941586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012153275,0.000011310393,0.0029698615,0.0016228476,0.000007408545,0.00007299117,0.015166486,0.0000712257,0.000077028635,0.013425606,0.9665502,0.000012856042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029904498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06695432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029904498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012378169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017229807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08981031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339579576","doi":"","title":"Checking in to Club Resorts: How Courts are Applying the New Test for Jurisdiction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Club; Personal jurisdiction; Presumption; Doctrine; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Civil procedure; Test (biology); Medicine","score_opus":0.017265068575965277,"score_gpt":0.2921520228342574,"score_spread":0.2748869542582921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339579576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50738066,0.0044903266,0.02859728,0.12417363,0.0006856301,0.0001571319,0.00016758886,0.00017719406,0.33417058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901162,0.00035761864,0.002199619,0.00345232,0.000067278175,0.000017788509,0.000021330823,0.000024246763,0.003743559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95414925,0.013036176,0.0013810113,0.004365115,0.016047712,0.011020857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96582675,0.019641949,0.0022011478,0.0027295,0.0067908843,0.0028096852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024716912,0.0002605039,0.0009106394,0.0046421587,0.019939292,0.019806813,0.004044096,0.006847434,0.0033820728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08460089,0.0006132652,0.0010761772,0.004505605,0.058458775,0.010042367,0.010661294,0.012109806,0.00036568343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032908927,0.000027034437,0.010675141,0.00005009033,0.000026131258,0.00048868574,0.027427627,0.00056730286,0.00034049922,0.9254182,0.0040125744,0.030933807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007663336,0.00014717007,0.040244944,0.00086906523,0.00013610891,0.00048696777,0.046392936,0.0033225105,0.0015199339,0.77378553,0.1326753,0.00034296248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39648682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4973656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39648682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029208697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039151225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78835803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341367679","doi":"10.7202/1035639ar","title":"Classification of Property and Conceptions of Ownership in Civil and Common Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feudalism; Property (philosophy); Law; Civil law (Civil law); Institution; Property law; Common law; Sociology; Flexibility (engineering); Legal history; Comparative law; Law and economics; Political science; Commercial law; Property rights; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.04113192195556087,"score_gpt":0.28943074855975337,"score_spread":0.2482988266041925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341367679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13351817,0.016902285,0.1032058,0.018517964,0.00077325833,0.00015542138,0.00027920544,0.00009917085,0.72654873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758079,0.0025421467,0.008065299,0.0005860052,0.0002442074,0.00014963961,0.00019244365,0.000041198327,0.012371156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465644,0.0024783935,0.00025944549,0.000533923,0.0013031842,0.00076854404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522406,0.0023805257,0.0007253273,0.0007143784,0.0005340894,0.00042153554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004140237,0.00041001904,0.0005136482,0.0047125015,0.003932806,0.011592417,0.0017269161,0.0021735365,0.004805151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007879953,0.00019616394,0.00059800385,0.005181283,0.034055207,0.017572988,0.0037416485,0.0024514613,0.0004700083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002018678,0.0000030610734,0.00019043541,0.000006789734,8.0584994e-7,0.000009499785,0.0012530368,0.000061744955,0.000014776439,0.9962781,0.0003131872,0.0018665653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068298123,0.000020337462,0.0018586233,0.00015406073,0.0000056080403,0.00012437846,0.0042463667,0.001224145,0.00010112939,0.9322051,0.060038783,0.000014675749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008058911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035071897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011592417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006919706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002363153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050206244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341524204","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-19054-9_2","title":"New Wine in Old Bottles: Corrupt Foreign Contracts in Canadian Private Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Language change; Criminal law; Damages; Conviction; Private law; Common law; Conflict of laws; Civil law (Civil law); Legislation; Public law; Liability","score_opus":0.06895072454714958,"score_gpt":0.3252219681275689,"score_spread":0.2562712435804193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341524204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023909567,0.012910382,0.0021041487,0.049007613,0.00080289843,0.0000502983,0.00025935966,0.000040644176,0.910915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59492284,0.010201134,0.0017646683,0.009885953,0.00043195699,0.00006306155,0.00014544664,0.00010330662,0.38248175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959138,0.0005288251,0.000072797025,0.00035461862,0.0016727636,0.001457165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770147,0.0007182935,0.00012000513,0.0001594988,0.0009876518,0.0003130803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026406995,0.00060914905,0.00053803687,0.0028717401,0.026771836,0.021545162,0.002365739,0.0069987634,0.015892277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008339985,0.00049273745,0.00056470995,0.0073984223,0.016843421,0.00727985,0.0031170556,0.00737528,0.0006305973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053968993,0.000005903826,0.00025057807,0.000018838342,0.0000024278474,0.00004450171,0.005868459,0.00010634121,0.000021548189,0.9556214,0.03138433,0.0066702045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001241315,0.000011046489,0.0050880965,0.0005168547,0.000029982713,0.00013788181,0.030426193,0.0008833804,0.00019490793,0.22925785,0.73334867,0.00009280549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9812076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99176544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8627532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13724677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14564954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341673510","doi":"","title":"“Private Property Rights and Public Responsibility: Leaving Room for the Homeless”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"City Research Online (City University London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Property law; Numerus clausus; Jurisprudence; Property rights; Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Tangible property; Political science; Business; Intangible property; Sociology","score_opus":0.21921670570976343,"score_gpt":0.37078117699156904,"score_spread":0.1515644712818056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341673510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107682854,0.0040408084,0.017227994,0.14079127,0.00038400435,0.00008529121,0.00010181916,0.00006578775,0.72962016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629916,0.0005823577,0.00065847876,0.007110801,0.00006955084,0.000021655624,0.000017135046,0.0000140729835,0.028534459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409676,0.0014744634,0.00008169358,0.00047093775,0.0016491034,0.0022270763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736565,0.0010033016,0.00023875636,0.00029106138,0.00058360276,0.0005175937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033223033,0.0002529713,0.00028704776,0.00083986874,0.014851993,0.0071803653,0.0020375892,0.005399049,0.003493994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006242791,0.00026786767,0.00050039287,0.0007826329,0.048578955,0.005619704,0.0051463596,0.005585042,0.0002819967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031613279,0.0000040945088,0.00022389741,0.00000817316,0.0000012824697,0.00009999398,0.0070749107,0.00006979806,0.00003306117,0.98743963,0.003361284,0.0016808136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041251584,0.000023988721,0.0035511847,0.00023979104,0.00002835769,0.00038938745,0.030017186,0.00094089226,0.00058465166,0.6105195,0.35359347,0.000070262446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7459187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78823316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7459187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026703123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040852394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51115525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342085789","doi":"","title":"Prometheus Bound or Loose Cannon? Punitive Damages for Pure Breach of Contract in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Breach of contract; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.0219427764834844,"score_gpt":0.2522500638585798,"score_spread":0.2303072873750954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342085789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22184666,0.007802484,0.008323456,0.07633601,0.000599085,0.00017980317,0.00017395854,0.000090897534,0.6846477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583367,0.0025562516,0.0016156546,0.0089829955,0.00007621669,0.000034489683,0.00003015689,0.000020693646,0.028346766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248487,0.0006286464,0.00017014203,0.0003598669,0.0037681859,0.0025882884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968822,0.0011556713,0.00021073142,0.00012864762,0.0010580847,0.0005646762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031900606,0.0003771479,0.0004833065,0.0016836197,0.01763373,0.009278006,0.0019388057,0.004951647,0.004164393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010874544,0.00044567318,0.00043572258,0.0019548314,0.011431319,0.0023330483,0.0044012535,0.0054621412,0.00025493567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035217763,0.000040611238,0.0047059413,0.000054662047,0.000023312843,0.0007041407,0.0052638515,0.0018906344,0.00046351922,0.94351065,0.01725749,0.026050026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014609534,0.00012613942,0.040073134,0.0010528043,0.00022380902,0.00150945,0.031871676,0.011237631,0.00248942,0.36446005,0.5463414,0.00046843154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96008104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06129015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06129015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12143485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4446932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342974016","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx027","title":"Conceptions of Authority and the Anglo-American Common Law Divide","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.06470010365945968,"score_gpt":0.41108569366609915,"score_spread":0.3463855900066395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342974016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12520778,0.008199121,0.012391619,0.021513322,0.00025902892,0.000024736177,0.000030830914,0.00003868284,0.8323349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988862,0.0011805755,0.0009978353,0.0014200945,0.00015167153,0.000027018898,0.00001468971,0.000010631802,0.007335584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523735,0.0017541383,0.0001732283,0.0006622691,0.0013543688,0.000818547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640685,0.0018857323,0.00042500478,0.00024894363,0.00058384513,0.0004496471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004577498,0.000283385,0.00035751093,0.004075395,0.007463165,0.008895789,0.00092237483,0.0023785243,0.002592804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058128815,0.00021075261,0.00032447668,0.0020554261,0.039018244,0.010004385,0.005089831,0.004383302,0.00032399138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013299077,0.000002788336,0.00008995827,0.000002640442,5.775938e-7,0.000007645816,0.0026228754,0.000028714381,0.000011984967,0.9961093,0.0001625867,0.0009596834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000879291,0.000010600268,0.0010820774,0.00008415019,0.000005852785,0.000047824447,0.0049577956,0.0004657111,0.00003665275,0.9484661,0.044822577,0.000011870299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016768578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012410026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016768578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004722893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05957097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343181159","doi":"10.5040/9781782256595","title":"The Common Law of Obligations : Divergence and Unity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Divergence (linguistics); Law; Common law; Political science; Municipal law; Comparative law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Sources of law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03722403890192696,"score_gpt":0.28970269781135005,"score_spread":0.2524786589094231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343181159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112110935,0.04938859,0.08922541,0.13990292,0.001439589,0.00017213612,0.00016058428,0.00010298302,0.6074968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723714,0.0040171854,0.008232171,0.0032567454,0.00045584142,0.00016107244,0.00005403665,0.00011018934,0.0113413315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96235985,0.02426763,0.0016368284,0.003286665,0.0062762653,0.002172811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961709,0.026597226,0.002072628,0.0039073774,0.0039660526,0.0017476728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026058191,0.0007181632,0.002011005,0.0041944315,0.010865562,0.023999471,0.00302283,0.007175061,0.004007095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047703236,0.00083949306,0.0009870257,0.005225115,0.13577694,0.05121973,0.014956608,0.013349941,0.0005033363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026204248,0.000003549027,0.000046982077,0.00000675693,0.0000011298566,0.000008690719,0.004320441,0.000041777123,0.000007727534,0.99437654,0.00027766114,0.00090619246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005713514,0.000003945802,0.00011391828,0.000062277635,0.0000021321314,0.000014390728,0.002951513,0.00016034288,0.00001856794,0.9866426,0.010017192,0.0000074190666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015313184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008435091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026058191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01631794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01504966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13781059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343280807","doi":"10.5235/204033211796290236","title":"That Can't Be Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09642817852675073,"score_gpt":0.33244959957679376,"score_spread":0.23602142105004303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343280807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005808654,0.0025675106,0.012063562,0.079539485,0.0022977472,0.00007630847,0.00013906078,0.00009849748,0.8974092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5396429,0.0027200729,0.008530715,0.07767757,0.0028000225,0.0005477143,0.00023219078,0.00030481926,0.367544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98784024,0.0033615688,0.0004425995,0.0026208302,0.0037255192,0.0020093052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896304,0.0044233114,0.0005241148,0.0032627292,0.0013848122,0.0007746868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0107294675,0.00071239576,0.0016429011,0.0012253474,0.008291128,0.012159999,0.0026214796,0.012932878,0.027691638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02295319,0.0007635262,0.0009821095,0.0009870972,0.04681104,0.01889192,0.007907445,0.016940558,0.0063660974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002966842,0.0000063706657,0.00002383305,0.000012267057,0.0000030086753,0.000014878216,0.00037967248,0.000017456017,0.000025887857,0.993494,0.004727936,0.0012916888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011013825,0.0000050471726,0.00006246181,0.000069702386,0.0000068989048,0.00004995858,0.00041261906,0.000034069573,0.000079452686,0.9034314,0.09583006,0.000007228149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004685312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053598736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027691638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035888557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053207306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09263772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343595580","doi":"","title":"Caveat Cloudster: Why Traditional Common and Civil Property Law Should Apply to Virtual Property and How It Will Change the Legal Realities of the Internet","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tangible property; Property (philosophy); Property law; Intangible property; Intellectual property; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Law and economics; Business; Property rights; Real property; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.1856089506789757,"score_gpt":0.3280840012781128,"score_spread":0.14247505059913712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343595580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003013106,0.002091523,0.009091412,0.8765041,0.005341605,0.000047856174,0.00029196579,0.00026623567,0.10335215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20342946,0.004215777,0.016487334,0.67033076,0.00819742,0.000354251,0.00022771393,0.00066315033,0.096094064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899004,0.0021902684,0.0005020181,0.002477393,0.003521611,0.0014082965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96819466,0.021608507,0.0013052514,0.0026591802,0.0053605507,0.00087177946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01242103,0.0008951673,0.0013249575,0.0013404883,0.012161712,0.013175751,0.0045519397,0.021054912,0.03036632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064473845,0.00077606033,0.0018125189,0.0017238123,0.029927725,0.026622383,0.0056294375,0.038528286,0.0070538823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012908491,0.00001466548,0.00025454545,0.000045999725,0.000006906321,0.00011172971,0.00089633925,0.00019518129,0.000052429623,0.8648903,0.12844001,0.0050790594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050163275,0.000015764972,0.00046020997,0.00025721404,0.000015196563,0.0001937488,0.001183044,0.001149164,0.00035731157,0.73552155,0.2607134,0.000083105166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09383469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07588489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09383469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012353634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020970354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18657702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346001065","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Land Claims in New Zealand and Canada, from Grievance to Enterprise","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Indigenous; Land rights; Land law; Geography; Land tenure; Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Law; Archaeology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.006059886689152292,"score_gpt":0.204084407202047,"score_spread":0.1980245205128947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346001065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78943574,0.010632281,0.00022419845,0.032751855,0.00022327389,0.000054413038,0.00038022536,0.000020596133,0.16627736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780622,0.0037453566,0.00017919693,0.0014881946,0.000038370774,0.000021883994,0.00008675518,0.000018488287,0.016359514],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969194,0.00023812075,0.00007162156,0.00018103317,0.0010916865,0.0014981809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535394,0.00085011235,0.00047632237,0.00016519961,0.0014667879,0.0016876315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021949094,0.00030401823,0.00042854575,0.0033588172,0.02658537,0.00874483,0.0018747778,0.0023678243,0.0038866578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01084965,0.00030131848,0.00019722657,0.006201095,0.01836773,0.0047351574,0.0078065125,0.0037071086,0.00017590652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010187543,0.00010084345,0.046963286,0.00018658424,0.000030446463,0.0028418796,0.7404369,0.0002615548,0.00044117824,0.123751745,0.028472552,0.05641116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012126238,0.00002219552,0.12590757,0.0003862392,0.000027277742,0.0004941107,0.7274898,0.00021271103,0.00015102715,0.0077561243,0.13746004,0.0000807457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99454087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08286804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08286804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12052379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60125256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346418613","doi":"","title":"The incompleteness of accounting rules and justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.023794405601988092,"score_gpt":0.32048698136718007,"score_spread":0.296692575765192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346418613","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2640285,0.021805022,0.40112016,0.13025612,0.0008560709,0.00018605322,0.0011626541,0.00023573595,0.18034981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96989274,0.0034738951,0.021164525,0.0014671494,0.0008211128,0.000105420695,0.00018607761,0.000043440854,0.0028456585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97587705,0.013473659,0.001973004,0.002215042,0.005297724,0.0011634898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77530605,0.1761943,0.014680419,0.019950831,0.012349823,0.0015186161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03428291,0.0007374739,0.0028796198,0.0038556398,0.0037357735,0.01114611,0.0024616623,0.004299827,0.0036435884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12798673,0.0013112008,0.0014967895,0.0038232668,0.029800164,0.02488404,0.0037517333,0.008395644,0.0003451214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012320467,0.00001532823,0.00047569835,0.00004519,0.000019439814,0.000025399022,0.00028434017,0.002453304,0.0000213839,0.9926791,0.0007076939,0.0032606772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003582023,0.0000020449497,0.0001414031,0.00001528227,0.0000049185983,0.000008453607,0.000045819343,0.0012202031,0.000021172278,0.99787986,0.00065390207,0.000003487226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008685235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055957967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03428291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067575434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009465716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1813075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346729302","doi":"10.7202/1036168ar","title":"Les obligations de la banque au regard des sommes déposées dans un compte en fidéicommis","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022243004138695097,"score_gpt":0.2891361347788276,"score_spread":0.2668931306401325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346729302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22433554,0.00085552206,0.012886738,0.010697771,0.00033942514,0.00012907365,0.00023852612,0.00008036882,0.7504371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78735036,0.00050103304,0.0034182037,0.001413143,0.00009980176,0.00014641367,0.00014790494,0.000076635835,0.20684654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518025,0.0015448859,0.00019069,0.00053160737,0.0014037092,0.0011489708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99105495,0.0027317957,0.0013479572,0.0008857106,0.002497709,0.0014819317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036864884,0.0002928645,0.00030422816,0.000988434,0.009367879,0.005811333,0.0012085083,0.0022828856,0.045171436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011257334,0.00048344588,0.0003514408,0.00085435784,0.006223524,0.0036755288,0.0044167843,0.0038986632,0.0037798278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017834148,0.00010821683,0.018363435,0.00014033604,0.000026148993,0.00086651486,0.044817407,0.00043110858,0.0023988492,0.8795988,0.0113422,0.041728657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057943842,0.00015864604,0.0681724,0.00067414757,0.000045079225,0.0008388862,0.06333381,0.00090067106,0.002788118,0.10963045,0.7532595,0.00014041328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058472335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10019288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058472335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006515761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016447196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15111351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235110027","doi":"","title":"Duties, Liabilities and Damages","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01383848270066181,"score_gpt":0.29422105207690596,"score_spread":0.2803825693762442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235110027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032759573,0.007830762,0.022264933,0.011034538,0.0010585198,0.00016770743,0.0010614488,0.00009907883,0.92372346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6260518,0.0068013584,0.015565816,0.0021863137,0.0018740757,0.00052263297,0.00046131262,0.000063249216,0.34647354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962379,0.00092379627,0.00032392386,0.00040960583,0.0017339031,0.00037086342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763954,0.0011180924,0.00026538895,0.00041732632,0.0004242643,0.00013534306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026217913,0.00061570393,0.0007698701,0.0029626626,0.0028403304,0.0070741507,0.0009497545,0.0035804678,0.020312749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008247397,0.0005121876,0.0005696548,0.0025471032,0.008450053,0.0053828517,0.0024533055,0.0043486953,0.0051343013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010965347,0.0000369145,0.00041370068,0.00003215533,0.000005975292,0.00004020662,0.00035474254,0.0002661007,0.00017560578,0.98221415,0.005445121,0.011004525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010057866,0.000029000055,0.0016909027,0.00008640051,0.000013262008,0.00024755826,0.0006225092,0.0005187062,0.00015288773,0.9244123,0.072196856,0.000019636649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027308215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040290477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020312749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022643425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026130925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06795293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2353885775","doi":"","title":"Chinese Multilateral Recognition and Enforcement Arrangement for Civil and Commercial Judgments:Proposed Solutions for Four Critical Challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; China; Enforcement; Mainland China; Political science; Obstacle; Law and economics; Business; International trade; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.27886563289478034,"score_gpt":0.4744573319981545,"score_spread":0.19559169910337415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2353885775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27675366,0.0037487147,0.086725764,0.13961178,0.0008172316,0.0017315608,0.00020596941,0.0004757398,0.48992956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9298661,0.00053649023,0.026121024,0.006240322,0.000327085,0.0006134324,0.00006574372,0.000032961812,0.036196847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984377,0.0034861767,0.000957325,0.0024077075,0.005238137,0.0035336222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988881,0.0035603477,0.0012454996,0.0017538648,0.0032686421,0.0012906683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018887127,0.000461294,0.00058122375,0.002689672,0.0072462936,0.010253827,0.00365006,0.006313159,0.0065110056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022067178,0.00071607745,0.0009486086,0.0025187416,0.008768944,0.0075978474,0.0062606544,0.0054933447,0.00044739156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031651594,0.000058902424,0.003717939,0.00006835526,0.00002171322,0.00041492726,0.0018069365,0.001478458,0.00041757265,0.9553227,0.0057645747,0.030896371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004554968,0.0003449177,0.024945827,0.0005891251,0.00020591814,0.0010104025,0.008820201,0.033539336,0.004581349,0.71653533,0.20855656,0.00041557665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04221155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049390353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04221155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01675862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040184904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12159288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361095287","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3873","title":"Acquisitive prescription and fundamental rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Doctrine; Nothing; Medical prescription; Law; Virtue; Political science; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.01045418138607904,"score_gpt":0.23882048966831887,"score_spread":0.22836630828223983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361095287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048012562,0.005880164,0.030750075,0.02002219,0.00030513163,0.000071787494,0.000076067365,0.00009498107,0.8947871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94446266,0.0018761083,0.004142283,0.002724377,0.00034995488,0.00010125435,0.000032439497,0.00005149145,0.046259474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994333,0.0026575187,0.0002488473,0.000777454,0.0012648049,0.0007184709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744725,0.0012776951,0.0002690386,0.00045359737,0.00038918343,0.00016322716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006232245,0.00036454125,0.00043408357,0.0011068844,0.0071720863,0.0057880837,0.0011116337,0.0044829696,0.0042486764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006936789,0.00043692,0.00038134228,0.0011915057,0.06224214,0.006199426,0.00516226,0.005503634,0.0006285734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001106788,0.0000013986189,0.000016366326,0.0000039038346,3.3238462e-7,0.000008082641,0.0008071892,0.000025466958,0.000024130468,0.9983059,0.000212606,0.0005933752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134976835,0.000018502005,0.00031295067,0.00009807696,0.000004135105,0.000095455165,0.0008893723,0.0003512713,0.0003636537,0.90636164,0.09147289,0.000018592107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016193585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013427806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016193585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007791336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00649835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056530416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2364822245","doi":"","title":"The Nature of Trust for Independent Management of Property by Entrustment and How to Integrate the Trust System into the Civil Code——from the Categorization Perspective of Property Management Entrustment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Beifang faxue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Trust law; Express trust; Blind trust; Property (philosophy); Trust management (information system); Civil code; Business; Property management; Agency (philosophy); Law; Voting trust; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Computer security; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010030623814099393,"score_gpt":0.25890139933339823,"score_spread":0.24887077551929884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2364822245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07350423,0.0075569996,0.21622314,0.10559691,0.001537953,0.00025222581,0.0001232512,0.00017528876,0.59503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678342,0.0011778696,0.012407458,0.0016219519,0.000244482,0.00013721366,0.00002829928,0.000032624874,0.016515952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955916,0.0020399648,0.00026085254,0.00058147585,0.0009109763,0.0006150944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959478,0.0011471396,0.0006024357,0.0008727618,0.00089368207,0.0005362491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004363513,0.00027725432,0.0003726823,0.0015526089,0.0045964154,0.007136387,0.00086788624,0.0031864282,0.0027364995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006783992,0.0002857524,0.00066997716,0.0010910976,0.03236946,0.0142859155,0.0031185525,0.0037700639,0.000449318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017074266,0.0000020961386,0.00013701529,0.000005463259,0.0000010078853,0.000030677853,0.00090764713,0.000065448265,0.000027363569,0.9964198,0.0006954654,0.0017062995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007250224,0.000015995942,0.00096026884,0.00010729151,0.000006365125,0.00017633122,0.0019978927,0.0019134141,0.00014133913,0.9507497,0.04389762,0.000026485943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026729384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01434967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026729384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011960669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007997238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086781144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W236800487","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004847","title":"Improperly Collected Taxes: The Border Between Private and Public Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Doctrine; Restitution; Law; Political science; Normative; Private law; Constitutional law; Public law; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02420793817266316,"score_gpt":0.3110538842295081,"score_spread":0.28684594605684494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W236800487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24268506,0.011647012,0.07893563,0.1470463,0.00063566957,0.000072827446,0.00012626995,0.00015821151,0.51869303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881015,0.0012653716,0.0024680858,0.0035902422,0.00019588752,0.00002570551,0.000014824749,0.000028103443,0.0043103066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913914,0.0024023654,0.00040677865,0.0013263111,0.0035050781,0.00096800324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99205,0.0043967147,0.00093405467,0.0013504305,0.0008887052,0.00038012638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006285052,0.00019928743,0.0007264048,0.0017727797,0.006277486,0.013572334,0.0013974247,0.005162725,0.0025685239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130014345,0.00038654287,0.0005980312,0.002108017,0.042585403,0.016366784,0.0059085283,0.009002037,0.0003148603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028297734,0.0000047716217,0.00012994662,0.000004111987,7.887993e-7,0.0000148364015,0.0005452911,0.000043224125,0.000023292172,0.9973367,0.00034019357,0.0015540612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008033053,0.000009260583,0.0006533318,0.000080850274,0.0000049658697,0.00007887952,0.0012490461,0.00050194765,0.00021328001,0.9784696,0.018719403,0.000011461869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012605467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011846851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013572334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010642384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010822179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07721621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2369288094","doi":"","title":"Discussion on Qualifications of Property Owners of Residential Quarter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wenzhou University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property management; Real estate; Business; Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Estate; Property law; Legislature; Property rights; Real property; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Intangible property; Law and economics; Finance; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01919868074748187,"score_gpt":0.28944079124622885,"score_spread":0.27024211049874697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2369288094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50611013,0.0026828698,0.0138388425,0.112554476,0.0008601073,0.00017956871,0.00021343029,0.00005194568,0.36350867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686817,0.00048097278,0.0013789638,0.0055397707,0.0001703286,0.00005127652,0.000039642167,0.000007913988,0.023649454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499965,0.002004922,0.00033274523,0.0006207409,0.0010017371,0.0010403552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693763,0.0016350014,0.0002965672,0.00019691962,0.0006542881,0.00027976232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067124544,0.00018272325,0.000359337,0.0007883703,0.008805922,0.0029518465,0.0012808071,0.0037713442,0.0050432696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007397592,0.00028035583,0.0005413546,0.0009219776,0.011443967,0.004385442,0.002845831,0.003520779,0.0002987706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018895675,0.00003205055,0.0050961627,0.000058547655,0.0000051439824,0.00204832,0.05735833,0.00016317054,0.00085002,0.91931933,0.007487974,0.007562056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055973742,0.00016668095,0.039366152,0.0006349246,0.000053704767,0.002506191,0.11351603,0.0019682315,0.0026153603,0.32544428,0.51354164,0.00013088417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030908426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0260312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030908426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005191429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00523917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061457038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2370864305","doi":"","title":"Research on the Establishment and Application of Punitive Damages in China's Copyright Infringement: in the Background of the Third Amendment of Copyright Law of China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Tort; Damages; Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Business; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.08181381851861066,"score_gpt":0.3898436735424806,"score_spread":0.3080298550238699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2370864305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8773262,0.008486387,0.006874174,0.012858911,0.00021275568,0.00016240272,0.00010228769,0.000028828159,0.09394802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98604465,0.0040399395,0.0008743842,0.00027069496,0.000075272364,0.000023715944,0.000032439202,0.0000034836667,0.008635514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988669,0.0002013998,0.00010369577,0.00018231815,0.0003832189,0.00026249932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983041,0.0005766728,0.0003983304,0.0000643594,0.0004543769,0.00020214314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018170088,0.00022579943,0.0003229235,0.0020760077,0.0023786826,0.0032925177,0.0007882881,0.0014067307,0.0038167958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003686059,0.00023461336,0.0005666909,0.0021805333,0.0019043384,0.0037701372,0.0011717097,0.001244176,0.0001117317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083002706,0.00025334928,0.23014122,0.0011177191,0.00013817126,0.0061407844,0.02914987,0.005269552,0.0032896013,0.59896135,0.0069833663,0.118472114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055049706,0.0002583963,0.6662274,0.0011648572,0.00041401904,0.0022696033,0.04386883,0.03673236,0.0033714494,0.14612988,0.099318355,0.00018971015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03780412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049618628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03780412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058735353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006901664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07516819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2374084926","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Margaret Jane Radin, Boilerplate, the Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, and the Rule of Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2013)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Severability; Sociology; Economics; Exclusion clause; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.013075682700066848,"score_gpt":0.2576372167940441,"score_spread":0.24456153409397727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2374084926","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000111281675,0.86283207,0.0003260899,0.05301248,0.034652323,0.000039905215,0.0002799585,0.00012070381,0.048625246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015676683,0.6647438,0.0004918909,0.057136305,0.025294868,0.00012409766,0.00062705437,0.00018794613,0.24982636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884653,0.00013597698,0.00006117564,0.00015495802,0.0007171209,0.000084163206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800855,0.00086964195,0.00016508556,0.00006262542,0.00066561846,0.00022839825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008684008,0.0012774719,0.0018302734,0.0032946952,0.0015219664,0.005177141,0.0023189203,0.0045938874,0.070175454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004270825,0.00078669493,0.0007304658,0.005189427,0.0015695625,0.005547567,0.002028025,0.0065571945,0.05531561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035884666,0.0000052998807,0.000011886322,0.00033982893,0.0000026450055,0.000014828741,0.000030608964,0.00002132388,0.000017908827,0.0011522959,0.9763312,0.022068711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033153212,0.0000037495533,0.00007881949,0.00055034325,0.0000027301585,0.000077282304,0.0000287419,0.000008748589,0.000008491521,0.00048868195,0.9987446,0.000004510187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008670685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02049837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070175454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033893632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054195463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23476028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2377765276","doi":"","title":"On Theory of Abolishment of Coerced Apology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sichuan Police college","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Legislation; Tort; Law; Political science; Legislature; Anger; Liability; Damages; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.018879125927078518,"score_gpt":0.3176060461059463,"score_spread":0.29872692017886776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2377765276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046721466,0.006148236,0.2581524,0.01775761,0.0009358374,0.0002250948,0.00023906892,0.00015115623,0.66966915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9018941,0.0035821516,0.030640438,0.0028635697,0.0010575149,0.00038637125,0.00011161784,0.00006445791,0.05939977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967012,0.0007305848,0.00019198691,0.0006918611,0.0012381847,0.00044622543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968059,0.0014405978,0.00040088568,0.00046486434,0.0007030993,0.00018459295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032043133,0.00047217766,0.0006238486,0.0019472139,0.0025519754,0.0029845554,0.00153952,0.0032118796,0.006967645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005979327,0.00034839642,0.0011218794,0.0007619482,0.013705139,0.005546702,0.0024397608,0.0037882116,0.0008918861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014812306,0.0000039027314,0.00006616045,0.000009655006,0.000001479703,0.000040806593,0.000100224315,0.00020545426,0.000039491628,0.9983789,0.0003455453,0.0008068649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011176216,0.000011750926,0.00014547931,0.000032163578,0.0000041776048,0.00010255641,0.000053916072,0.002300845,0.00008067506,0.9900433,0.007206359,0.000007576094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029618908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014879756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006967645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029326086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029138832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023309052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387039812","doi":"","title":"The Analysis and Revelation from the Land Expropriation Compensation Theory in Some Countries (Areas)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Order (exchange); Natural resource economics; Economics; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.015570710823763337,"score_gpt":0.2756619345650785,"score_spread":0.26009122374131516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387039812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16761768,0.008558166,0.2347873,0.0454684,0.00049814885,0.00016790483,0.00034004962,0.00007411478,0.54248834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95956147,0.0031560548,0.017111447,0.0013203466,0.000292159,0.00009155394,0.00007676497,0.0000125941015,0.018377567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989778,0.0003582782,0.000050731323,0.00019126256,0.0002911662,0.00013075529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990908,0.00043280536,0.00014290145,0.00009598947,0.0002038413,0.000033627286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018833481,0.00024954733,0.00030230344,0.0015338551,0.0016795372,0.0021433246,0.00067233294,0.001270052,0.00724005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024754521,0.00017685456,0.0007258069,0.0012176272,0.0062503573,0.004726565,0.0013725865,0.0018805383,0.00037483437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026493271,0.000008020044,0.00028652148,0.000026040043,0.000003614366,0.000042243948,0.00018556928,0.0004195874,0.00005901202,0.9950046,0.00063073036,0.003331365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065475024,0.00001630481,0.0013111789,0.0000605472,0.000009393509,0.00012021926,0.00032389164,0.0034165874,0.00021738998,0.97360533,0.020901224,0.000011341935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031875568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00281176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00724005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031343095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020481367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024220407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387444302","doi":"","title":"Rational Thoughts on \"System of Being Held Responsible for Misjudge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Guangxi Administative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04664267912043425,"score_gpt":0.36406767359407516,"score_spread":0.3174249944736409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387444302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06990512,0.00296306,0.07201104,0.24562179,0.0017680302,0.00016008712,0.00020404608,0.00029192524,0.607075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673545,0.00054022984,0.006257952,0.009765866,0.00044759238,0.00006036029,0.000032281652,0.000035078912,0.015506204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99050564,0.0052872044,0.00034592664,0.0011853527,0.0020633426,0.0006125127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955036,0.0017663634,0.0008118633,0.0006138224,0.001069308,0.00023500828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01061393,0.00048143466,0.00025925314,0.0011933992,0.0040325853,0.0070996243,0.0010737819,0.004675359,0.0032876313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009417807,0.00025782984,0.00040302926,0.00061831076,0.04275013,0.0057352423,0.0026251688,0.005641058,0.00047197836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032953963,0.00000329228,0.00014920128,0.0000069173384,0.000002825732,0.000019747127,0.0024696025,0.000056858193,0.00005787968,0.99410456,0.0019935134,0.0011323212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023172825,0.000026799293,0.0013601494,0.000075551136,0.000014873779,0.000086134445,0.0033792153,0.00090868195,0.00044444494,0.94021696,0.053433347,0.00003074776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006361614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052878913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01061393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004657395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039442508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056132495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2391269404","doi":"","title":"A Talk about the Efficacy of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract on Third-Parth Beneficiary","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Huaqiao University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prairie Improvement Network","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Third party; Payment; Business; Obligation; Third person; Actuarial science; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Finance; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.024940593999460445,"score_gpt":0.27887551437266667,"score_spread":0.2539349203732062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2391269404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050820146,0.0057870457,0.050391704,0.10779419,0.0017683483,0.0001170191,0.00014502597,0.000107682725,0.7830688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070645,0.0014948283,0.0067672706,0.014763968,0.00094682595,0.00014695556,0.000036996575,0.00006420987,0.068714425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944728,0.0021039178,0.00026917062,0.00084103586,0.001589559,0.0007235277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943178,0.0037272908,0.00035573635,0.0005648551,0.0008413541,0.0001930322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092242835,0.00031834294,0.00043271086,0.0011841164,0.0065167765,0.0056139347,0.0009852899,0.007362703,0.006716904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010420338,0.0003863399,0.0007403656,0.0009451133,0.017148878,0.008745231,0.0029812637,0.00924371,0.000564885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051023703,0.0000029169687,0.000121036115,0.000007717902,0.0000017313944,0.00005596063,0.0016748387,0.000024386893,0.00011139835,0.9950523,0.0016077417,0.0013348853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021910198,0.000061124934,0.002362742,0.00027733124,0.00004468683,0.0004234307,0.003540107,0.0011821346,0.0016272886,0.75565803,0.23474325,0.00005796394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006296283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004038354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0092242835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047541936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003189066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048783243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395124077","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court's Decision in Peoples: A New Standard of Directors' Liability?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Due diligence; Diligence; Corporation; Law; Internal revenue; Liability; Business; Agency (philosophy); Accounting; Revenue; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Service (business)","score_opus":0.014066832438940002,"score_gpt":0.2954388642385844,"score_spread":0.2813720317996444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395124077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039374463,0.004709182,0.02190163,0.6696482,0.0046494827,0.00010775148,0.0002584439,0.00012990841,0.25922093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6775227,0.0015516169,0.009267404,0.26679242,0.0043893647,0.00017729361,0.00013822805,0.00012547539,0.04003545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96515286,0.00943947,0.002049611,0.0045299106,0.014189694,0.0046384824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817583,0.008791938,0.0011945688,0.0017081635,0.0045345947,0.002012457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034840897,0.00043876545,0.0013076931,0.0011965112,0.0096849,0.015571612,0.0042597777,0.022130856,0.0030732506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050950117,0.00069866003,0.001194668,0.0016302096,0.026475834,0.010611412,0.0049422607,0.02496976,0.0008060725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017110344,0.000020028432,0.0006529236,0.000016584925,0.000009759579,0.00011671562,0.0022725435,0.00009799315,0.00012606628,0.9586275,0.03258447,0.0054583657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017389882,0.00008525941,0.0034333172,0.0005525568,0.000063068415,0.00028301135,0.0035411573,0.0010170148,0.0006808706,0.6793922,0.3106151,0.00016258121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12556924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15826872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12556924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016014865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029511621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24967664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395634684","doi":"","title":"Property Structures Underlying Contract (The Proprietary Properties of Contract)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Privity of contract; Property (philosophy); Exclusion clause; Contract management; Severability; Contract theory; Law and economics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03560458823435354,"score_gpt":0.2844330592121037,"score_spread":0.24882847097775018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395634684","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037130866,0.0023830417,0.49267384,0.018129673,0.00045413407,0.0004100659,0.001300456,0.00026586818,0.44725206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8531547,0.0021543559,0.10166036,0.0025408613,0.0013098893,0.0007020619,0.0005699355,0.00014355886,0.03776431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174374,0.0028956775,0.0006712031,0.0014563659,0.0025519927,0.0006809939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97916555,0.011477659,0.0026108886,0.0041208323,0.0021964845,0.0004285613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008909291,0.00043518996,0.00082346424,0.0023046867,0.0041244463,0.010284772,0.0016730871,0.006161734,0.012266126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027566295,0.0009884584,0.0013118321,0.0032005932,0.020202722,0.019299768,0.0032605396,0.006532144,0.001911854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011139321,0.0000022360107,0.000025100822,0.0000044810104,0.0000012120514,0.000008068042,0.00005874187,0.00006204715,0.000023651999,0.99890435,0.0002585616,0.0006503304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049580426,0.0000042798674,0.000078012454,0.000016505779,0.0000035954477,0.000044498123,0.000026407119,0.0004930927,0.00009550549,0.9940222,0.0052063665,0.0000045164893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035182377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020941375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012266126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00414645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004093206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047117352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398860631","doi":"10.1016/s0849-5831(16)30112-4","title":"Tribute and Tributaries","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal SOGC","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tributary; Tribute; Medicine; Geography; Archaeology; Cartography","score_opus":0.012320561224487858,"score_gpt":0.30879041910313865,"score_spread":0.29646985787865077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398860631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020035809,0.0026133787,0.012037461,0.030209744,0.001165986,0.00010838995,0.00013237198,0.00006522673,0.9336317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.721822,0.001532204,0.003886799,0.010613449,0.0012889551,0.00029561113,0.00013141586,0.0001301215,0.2602993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910204,0.0031248168,0.00051668775,0.0014196853,0.0017911812,0.0021270942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927094,0.003284094,0.0004087754,0.0011734263,0.0017263216,0.00069799967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005713628,0.00046149892,0.0018273714,0.002934084,0.02128919,0.016751384,0.0027408442,0.01347836,0.025271168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020516146,0.0009238894,0.00083385187,0.003771067,0.030836469,0.010423315,0.00837252,0.014230282,0.0038773702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024577,0.0000072891785,0.00007653794,0.000005170399,0.0000013324579,0.000021509375,0.000702572,0.00001941969,0.000008031865,0.99451536,0.0033032633,0.001337122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021779482,0.000020425168,0.0006543436,0.00012454683,0.000014342615,0.00013227187,0.002850084,0.00033429207,0.000079382844,0.8703988,0.12534912,0.000020534191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018632593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031529747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025271168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055188653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00960904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08454049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399699454","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511546471.018","title":"REFERENCES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.08284163801129249,"score_gpt":0.2794754871324653,"score_spread":0.1966338491211728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399699454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044266152,0.02873659,0.005039502,0.0074562514,0.020894684,0.00042176765,0.030516842,0.00214605,0.9043456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014582971,0.020098053,0.0033183189,0.0029044976,0.0023362455,0.00018383558,0.029334463,0.001121371,0.9392449],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920434,0.000067734734,0.000053979053,0.00012508468,0.0004900347,0.000058831283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777955,0.00033768849,0.000099713434,0.00018527507,0.0014027833,0.00019504149],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074413815,0.0009906566,0.0009493523,0.0076992093,0.0016259196,0.0024498107,0.0017681614,0.0011313758,0.63862884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058361166,0.00035508553,0.0008061025,0.0073862216,0.00051904056,0.0029231315,0.00148021,0.0018014677,0.54975605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065883055,0.000013411718,0.0000414153,0.00031721932,0.0000019643,0.000029477527,0.00003548037,0.000059798294,0.000094250216,0.0035249952,0.953917,0.041958384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.298008e-7,0.0000026129735,0.00009019575,0.0001784815,0.000001583969,0.000032222266,0.000019253312,0.000007393247,0.000038372767,0.00090042636,0.9987256,0.0000028271172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010091544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012564363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36137116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024544133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022944435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400367739","doi":"10.7202/1038707ar","title":"Fiduciary Duties, Conflict of Interest, and Proper Exercise of Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Discretion; Conflict of interest; Duty; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Defeasible estate; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.16717484330532556,"score_gpt":0.3585139573750075,"score_spread":0.19133911406968196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2400367739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06547926,0.008799265,0.11578008,0.06526762,0.00055340806,0.00014139878,0.00008195936,0.00007193739,0.7438251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97315073,0.0013609164,0.009109046,0.0047415453,0.00032105073,0.00014887903,0.00001988481,0.000033473112,0.011114498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816134,0.009692714,0.0008547591,0.0020031908,0.0039481805,0.0018876599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798765,0.013054755,0.002123657,0.0020930418,0.0018407872,0.0010113094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015259732,0.0003814435,0.00073000963,0.001408682,0.005867274,0.0094150845,0.0019376038,0.008340446,0.003096719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027704392,0.0004899227,0.00064377213,0.0011340367,0.055785604,0.0093592275,0.005461644,0.0073916456,0.000506451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033077818,0.0000053345884,0.0001206104,0.0000078052035,0.0000015772125,0.000046539335,0.00072528573,0.00015195893,0.000026830377,0.99685353,0.00066065707,0.0013965224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071630716,0.000006112216,0.000279981,0.000048823895,0.000003241323,0.00008065945,0.00041540302,0.00053444155,0.000063526306,0.98836786,0.010181851,0.000010947971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007596478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054850588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015259732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068901503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008388628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080702126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406705625","doi":"10.14288/1.0093239","title":"The principle of compensation in relation to public interference in the real property market : an interface of law and economics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real property; Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Economics; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Law; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.020750402275633607,"score_gpt":0.24251927970657164,"score_spread":0.22176887743093804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406705625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032835197,0.0119693745,0.20725147,0.07273201,0.0014467799,0.00020273778,0.00007526077,0.00007645149,0.6734107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90154827,0.005706598,0.030565275,0.008702158,0.0027886273,0.00049404555,0.00003884361,0.00009310493,0.05006315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914505,0.0034361398,0.00035807482,0.0009279834,0.0026554253,0.0011718421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926388,0.0049132854,0.0007466035,0.00061457395,0.0009028493,0.00018391649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009573156,0.00043761337,0.0008656638,0.0016093664,0.0038843546,0.010416416,0.0018090017,0.006444764,0.004287284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010103412,0.00045334146,0.0013911738,0.0014048042,0.034590513,0.011915987,0.0038628755,0.0070783356,0.00065838767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013874673,0.00000399977,0.000034326735,0.0000054298803,9.769903e-7,0.000012497023,0.000095730094,0.0002259939,0.000019247824,0.9985857,0.00034988738,0.0006648605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009434135,0.000014595189,0.00019028937,0.00006423053,0.000005230575,0.000050584214,0.00018409369,0.0013522921,0.00013167906,0.9770722,0.0209115,0.000013979282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042407815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033983076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010416416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006657831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006525182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050628304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408952470","doi":"","title":"'Anchored to the land': asserting and recognising Aboriginal jurisdiction in the Northwest Territories","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Argument (complex analysis); Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Business","score_opus":0.012626309957129609,"score_gpt":0.3143234003263392,"score_spread":0.3016970903692096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408952470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6948084,0.019128935,0.004986078,0.042448282,0.0010271142,0.00015326691,0.000077222605,0.000044297827,0.23732637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625042,0.0066247266,0.0026116467,0.0018806745,0.0000838406,0.000072504656,0.00003785174,0.000037606314,0.026146961],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553114,0.0024739592,0.00012995841,0.00023198676,0.00079428084,0.00083871256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967474,0.0018391106,0.00027198732,0.00011195172,0.0005199388,0.0005096067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006086271,0.00033116306,0.0005416676,0.0013937803,0.021742964,0.011128948,0.0023566475,0.0026984261,0.0021255102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006540408,0.0002949034,0.00022364355,0.0017399621,0.027953284,0.004621389,0.006764357,0.004311919,0.000192642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031576037,0.0000030582462,0.00063183554,0.000030234569,0.0000010465875,0.00020042222,0.98509383,0.000018737619,0.00012371571,0.007620473,0.0010964887,0.0051769195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.0036833e-7,0.0000043854716,0.0022617367,0.00017375927,0.000003069607,0.00011317401,0.9548167,0.000029282588,0.00008933406,0.0014413004,0.04105718,0.000009444934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7637545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9127376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23624551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022645738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03384681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4752736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412051618","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v5n1p32","title":"The Strange Death of the Law Merchant","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1945478226554423,"score_gpt":0.4807368746640306,"score_spread":0.2861890520085883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412051618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09866886,0.008303446,0.0035288716,0.621253,0.010996119,0.000032634984,0.00010410152,0.00007761878,0.25703532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80715835,0.0027672495,0.00067724724,0.08961812,0.0036378973,0.00002660984,0.000038464623,0.00010581571,0.09597022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474674,0.0025392442,0.00015433891,0.00071195106,0.0009153697,0.00093226816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570036,0.0014520847,0.00059081195,0.00038680216,0.0007819228,0.0010880379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046117934,0.00041349657,0.00063914113,0.00089812634,0.019551415,0.008875654,0.0009583488,0.011840717,0.004728784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01553281,0.00050916744,0.0005563585,0.0007134777,0.033924975,0.0105270045,0.006158952,0.022748787,0.0010537781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008112876,0.000028744364,0.0013154797,0.000043387343,0.000028781807,0.0033605825,0.06896352,0.00018016323,0.0003613227,0.7937529,0.12431843,0.0075655235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017450353,0.00008066491,0.0019715056,0.00027992335,0.00002355518,0.003058771,0.07467175,0.0003641365,0.00057999475,0.17741638,0.7414248,0.00011103046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010733695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012624468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019551415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042755906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003882689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031021714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413942910","doi":"","title":"The Test of Fundamentality in Anticipatory Breach Cases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Test (biology); Law; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Political science; Psychology; Damages; History","score_opus":0.01980872097524765,"score_gpt":0.3397365491974425,"score_spread":0.31992782822219484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413942910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2008468,0.0025238486,0.07158077,0.04201254,0.0007835335,0.0004363696,0.00031990398,0.00015638914,0.6813398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97849756,0.0003952482,0.0053465124,0.005244619,0.00031147336,0.00026031423,0.00006614811,0.000027232387,0.009850994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801348,0.004666338,0.0016696271,0.0028614271,0.0069069685,0.0037608265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97861177,0.0139415115,0.0013625344,0.002478876,0.0027021787,0.0009030559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017623326,0.0006083559,0.0009394572,0.0019245957,0.007857097,0.010023204,0.003513306,0.014655368,0.0043267645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046186525,0.0007848525,0.0017322799,0.0013035446,0.032306433,0.017246237,0.009908331,0.018694617,0.00056341215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016583152,0.000011199982,0.0003508316,0.000012241943,0.0000042541974,0.00017473915,0.0010320249,0.00007828618,0.00016575113,0.9962741,0.00061602343,0.0012639642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000713763,0.00009293195,0.0015785849,0.0002094955,0.000021343081,0.0004497628,0.0016338478,0.0016312827,0.0012556335,0.96667606,0.026303044,0.00007670137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022147812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019929431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022147812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076935864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010546079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093202114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415705895","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2724597","title":"EEtude Sur La Protection Possessoire (Study on the Protection of Possession)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022833009769364598,"score_gpt":0.2898711187837316,"score_spread":0.26703810901436703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415705895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9078529,0.0044308524,0.00070527167,0.0039116275,0.000058021233,0.00003663952,0.00036600739,0.0000029329103,0.08263564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830434,0.0015699303,0.00011739271,0.0002339217,0.00004293721,0.000020916428,0.0001069408,0.0000021204569,0.014862604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980844,0.00092140905,0.000084,0.00017152987,0.00031376551,0.00042492978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99182886,0.0061260993,0.0009063009,0.00038082697,0.000363502,0.00039441403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031818016,0.00014464029,0.00032614399,0.0012735843,0.0019719987,0.0018048486,0.0005883191,0.0011836246,0.012900875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087058935,0.00016354078,0.00041368112,0.0016076557,0.0028103443,0.0025870365,0.0019988755,0.0019447819,0.00054880895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005498439,0.0005965323,0.32631177,0.0005864165,0.00010893933,0.003430082,0.13953477,0.0006348833,0.0012097759,0.4259476,0.009404495,0.09168479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033393084,0.00062288786,0.73972285,0.0009909408,0.00008113177,0.0022513221,0.092576124,0.00055758096,0.0009692161,0.015896954,0.1462626,0.000034955625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027529206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025099464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027529206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015405979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022209615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054737926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24333709","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.044","title":"Sudbury Valley Trustees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.020616029590453982,"score_gpt":0.3183758545343567,"score_spread":0.2977598249439027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24333709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008309302,0.005966894,0.0023580096,0.011077373,0.0050285016,0.00026372075,0.007260303,0.0007653307,0.9589705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071720066,0.0014091979,0.0011974726,0.0007249641,0.00011874984,0.000040465107,0.0013566471,0.00017561876,0.9878049],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983937,0.0001753646,0.00006836018,0.00049732503,0.0006081209,0.0002572408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975712,0.00027538356,0.00014170662,0.00020090256,0.0011220218,0.00068876095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010853305,0.0013161058,0.0007716961,0.0015249411,0.0034997666,0.0053413585,0.0019537497,0.0021281312,0.7008701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028532504,0.0006070533,0.0004631103,0.0014265148,0.000984489,0.0018069536,0.0029034698,0.0018832593,0.2522709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004448654,0.00020323107,0.0040781763,0.0004666146,0.00003386054,0.0021807058,0.0007872039,0.00025067403,0.0037259636,0.025511684,0.5964713,0.36584574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013163516,0.00004102913,0.0014909179,0.000087771965,0.0000043884515,0.0002660203,0.0002893197,0.000058097386,0.00030429507,0.0006148894,0.99682033,0.000009745291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052490443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12800984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7008701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038058753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007004167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42667246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2442701321","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttw062","title":"New Czech Foundation and Trust (like) Law: initial experience and reactions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Czech; Personality; Foundation (evidence); Work (physics); Flexibility (engineering); Trust law; Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.03584434159582275,"score_gpt":0.34826614709379006,"score_spread":0.31242180549796733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2442701321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8265045,0.010802012,0.0021939632,0.029495155,0.0010855655,0.00015954429,0.00008684421,0.00005432395,0.12961803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98754126,0.0015366948,0.00018449222,0.0018915663,0.00007893903,0.00001654485,0.000022087259,0.00003258628,0.008695834],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843576,0.007348651,0.0004472641,0.0009806324,0.0035544604,0.0033113144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864763,0.00555878,0.0011797596,0.0004834985,0.001953399,0.0043482156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014589439,0.00040461743,0.0006162293,0.0011508304,0.012248403,0.012856598,0.0009617919,0.003498408,0.0057118894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030154342,0.00047704877,0.0004079599,0.0016456876,0.016333507,0.008440078,0.010154151,0.008595151,0.0004874225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023233445,0.00025042312,0.0089405,0.00031030556,0.000031614225,0.0036029664,0.79424524,0.00039218704,0.0014733408,0.13655517,0.022949059,0.031016817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031935095,0.00014959037,0.011862277,0.0002809365,0.000013106511,0.0017051585,0.6362632,0.0004655038,0.00043248598,0.00482635,0.34381187,0.00015754031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033029635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03182102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033029635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016356008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073382505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118671715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W244601112","doi":"","title":"Corporate Gatekeeper Liability in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Limited liability partnership; Liability; Statute; Law; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Business; Misconduct; Legal liability; Political science","score_opus":0.02630663196901786,"score_gpt":0.27663704903401376,"score_spread":0.2503304170649959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W244601112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15268268,0.024545351,0.0038582576,0.06303227,0.0008736943,0.00038553707,0.0025181277,0.00034387357,0.7517602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82273525,0.014894662,0.003453018,0.008285291,0.00024272747,0.00006868062,0.0009056812,0.000043111217,0.14937152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933543,0.00022894792,0.00016582962,0.00044259118,0.003749664,0.002058683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343747,0.0005817575,0.000529593,0.00014815024,0.003767187,0.0015358692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011875689,0.00031613206,0.00027764266,0.0030789697,0.01256722,0.0057091545,0.0026865578,0.002517976,0.007009976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00475245,0.00035298,0.00035693473,0.003970276,0.0043044877,0.0011301963,0.0022259792,0.00230331,0.0005064307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047866375,0.00010177533,0.029320005,0.00041600553,0.000031964006,0.0025915464,0.0071327635,0.0049218247,0.0011350189,0.63981605,0.19449091,0.119994365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026958951,0.000056661134,0.060499955,0.0006434508,0.000051434814,0.0010205732,0.0062771533,0.0033737568,0.0011779056,0.020339876,0.90637034,0.00016200735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14245893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14245893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26684284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467947037","doi":"","title":"L’Autonomie Gouvernementale Autochtone Et L’Option De Loi En Matière De Statut Personnel (Indigenous Self-Government and Choice of Personal Law in Canada)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.007297523862702814,"score_gpt":0.2478052367207992,"score_spread":0.24050771285809638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467947037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7772868,0.0014342655,0.001874898,0.016252678,0.000036944693,0.000039798062,0.00034765078,0.000022558093,0.20270434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755892,0.00017339934,0.00027824828,0.0003186964,0.00001019277,0.000006952735,0.000027414026,0.000007751123,0.023588013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689937,0.0003042156,0.000048624475,0.00024800457,0.00059308246,0.0019067142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975817,0.00095222215,0.00020589038,0.000102728096,0.00043588656,0.00072156725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019437058,0.00015362713,0.00035392094,0.0009480141,0.008165118,0.008608961,0.0014132559,0.0020390276,0.015227369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042471797,0.00023965258,0.00038749626,0.0014087055,0.009101773,0.0018476424,0.0022108203,0.0032459865,0.00036095997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010524153,0.00010786834,0.041410457,0.00003902856,0.000036043883,0.0003737167,0.020222403,0.0015944105,0.00044997208,0.9039191,0.0067008985,0.025040958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013082885,0.00010588267,0.33788735,0.00031906995,0.00010517356,0.0005036117,0.10827663,0.010021924,0.001417439,0.31308597,0.22788696,0.0002591937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97722137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04998112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04998112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0426374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36264008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468198089","doi":"","title":"Revisiting The Natural Contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ctheory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural studies; Critical theory; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Social contract; Philosophy and economics; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Anthropology; Philosophy; Geography; Politics; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.011283486555588524,"score_gpt":0.29643376415351547,"score_spread":0.28515027759792694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468198089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014775217,0.008198291,0.051282182,0.109972365,0.002087912,0.00006667569,0.00026758757,0.00006615057,0.8132836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7922489,0.0059038065,0.020739505,0.023721257,0.0032653532,0.0003258059,0.00020024435,0.00022737011,0.15336768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99216276,0.0042491183,0.0002726391,0.0010733807,0.0016815857,0.0005605203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99321944,0.00415581,0.00034288308,0.0010794054,0.0009681922,0.00023435481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008584961,0.00044740798,0.000931814,0.0020274287,0.0053257425,0.0070877085,0.0018687769,0.00597179,0.016905228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01835635,0.00043694623,0.0009562552,0.0016888084,0.024991227,0.013884857,0.0038020245,0.007877143,0.0016188973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001380971,0.0000018523403,0.000013816659,0.0000043125333,7.325292e-7,0.0000047111726,0.000071052746,0.00003503526,0.000003799009,0.99800867,0.001236059,0.00061848026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046948658,0.0000025353365,0.000048714915,0.000027933194,0.0000016265257,0.000014362508,0.000090443675,0.0002179469,0.000018330344,0.9651067,0.034463134,0.0000035315427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01644988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015255002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016905228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072494918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071092374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056553602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469737835","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-27256-6_4","title":"Les effets exercés par les crises financières sur la force obligatoire des contrats: certitudes et incertitudes du droit québécois en matière d’imprévision","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Law; Political science; Duty; Legislature; Civil code; Faith; Good faith; Morality; Humanities; Code (set theory); Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Legislation; Theology","score_opus":0.04066149223219637,"score_gpt":0.3068616005902412,"score_spread":0.26620010835804486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469737835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5359741,0.023965154,0.002399547,0.07599137,0.00063867564,0.000067555644,0.002027309,0.00006688433,0.3588694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91802675,0.0042650998,0.00048172654,0.0024958951,0.00013287,0.000032422435,0.0003140895,0.000027252014,0.07422384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969797,0.0006270675,0.00007951752,0.00022855915,0.0013359133,0.0007493537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927228,0.0038361829,0.0008331432,0.00017242816,0.0017839858,0.00065148034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003968061,0.0004776243,0.0005007452,0.0013806019,0.0031695173,0.006308775,0.0009844867,0.003250975,0.011559909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144946,0.0003533559,0.0005234473,0.0019703684,0.0032960924,0.00194815,0.0012900082,0.0042113345,0.0005520402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010664322,0.00021909643,0.09784519,0.0003232007,0.0004410806,0.0014456547,0.020556588,0.013552809,0.001298574,0.6458451,0.109892786,0.10751344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034449878,0.0004038961,0.5161092,0.0015911091,0.00049736904,0.0007335212,0.03524071,0.01558401,0.0026295623,0.092444785,0.3340725,0.00034886991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8916942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89910316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10830581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028451582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024664002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21788722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469780603","doi":"","title":"The Economic Characteristics of Indigenous Property Rights: A Canadian Case Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Property rights; Political science; Supreme court; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Prosperity; Context (archaeology); Law; Human rights; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.017211597394762978,"score_gpt":0.23858792934971168,"score_spread":0.2213763319549487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469780603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6009494,0.0051239794,0.002030754,0.010775271,0.000082335,0.00037057078,0.0011037964,0.000022507033,0.3795414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684203,0.0046658027,0.0020354397,0.00059006445,0.00001770873,0.00007370739,0.00019306577,0.000011146314,0.02399279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963941,0.0006457374,0.00008669924,0.00018436223,0.0013323977,0.0013566945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977912,0.0009349051,0.0001614581,0.000102389306,0.0007376457,0.00027241782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022683113,0.0004294573,0.00047940508,0.0031648926,0.02058794,0.004197396,0.0020347452,0.0025947369,0.0047271596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005014855,0.00028438694,0.0006085818,0.0076012677,0.0067684175,0.001473343,0.0024353585,0.0021865717,0.00021560625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016740734,0.0003048015,0.05812232,0.00067264657,0.00007259555,0.020556442,0.12325007,0.008334467,0.0013579776,0.6686394,0.038071126,0.080450684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008688543,0.00014086001,0.14196135,0.0015760814,0.00028374756,0.0064989156,0.34691566,0.009486023,0.0017093956,0.03568115,0.45534468,0.0003151778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101848684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.101848684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07690191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7389674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470189855","doi":"10.7202/1058698ar","title":"The Eve Decision — A Common Law Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Supreme court; Law; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Political science; Sterilization (economics); Scope (computer science); Business","score_opus":0.013430078905271757,"score_gpt":0.2984838862270745,"score_spread":0.28505380732180274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470189855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016722197,0.007967319,0.008918576,0.25086135,0.0011189233,0.00008744265,0.0002253083,0.000033348253,0.7140655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76037693,0.0065046228,0.004295465,0.08344765,0.0025850344,0.00022549104,0.00017227359,0.0000843519,0.1423082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98480564,0.0035039692,0.0003256179,0.0019319095,0.0046272557,0.004805593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911355,0.005020124,0.00031982097,0.000493589,0.0022925294,0.0007383979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012245779,0.000540062,0.0010844097,0.0030444304,0.013408938,0.018268844,0.0044179233,0.01660645,0.008398098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0178219,0.00046389145,0.0011625012,0.0024389268,0.034073845,0.009697183,0.0046860436,0.014855935,0.0009166311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021065712,0.0000055651285,0.000044809727,0.0000032477024,0.0000014108151,0.00003063537,0.00016925938,0.00006283507,0.000008654208,0.9958156,0.0031802321,0.0006755683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003265412,0.000017890301,0.0006190487,0.00024451828,0.00001909088,0.00007520887,0.0019883432,0.0010014302,0.00015970411,0.8377117,0.15809204,0.000038355058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34350783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29940414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34350783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034306575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040556934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6830168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472984480","doi":"","title":"Cultural Thin Skulls","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Context (archaeology); Harm; Law; Narrative; Liability; Government (linguistics); Compensation (psychology); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.014071415843022997,"score_gpt":0.32125186859033567,"score_spread":0.30718045274731265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472984480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01610393,0.019717053,0.0036422,0.17973796,0.014288885,0.000064158376,0.00021289078,0.000106568856,0.7661264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4895798,0.026407622,0.0038857246,0.14503187,0.009389027,0.00020823305,0.00023624807,0.00031461508,0.32494685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980101,0.0007636447,0.00006230109,0.00027271963,0.0004927941,0.00039848505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984995,0.00045662888,0.00019259946,0.00020663417,0.00031960692,0.0003250595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018946724,0.00083395874,0.0005714848,0.0013977474,0.014211259,0.0068157027,0.0016565779,0.0035906276,0.01801772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050933408,0.00031030565,0.00050808676,0.0011230963,0.017662052,0.006074694,0.006844225,0.008461487,0.00415979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022811604,0.000018112654,0.0006287315,0.00006481834,0.000010758619,0.00064469123,0.02236944,0.000076664226,0.00011235356,0.8307354,0.1217565,0.023559697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003942038,0.0000141135615,0.0004525122,0.00028284144,0.000006114918,0.00049749884,0.014263998,0.000056116613,0.00012664468,0.050163265,0.93411785,0.000015011177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015116387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021620916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01801772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036688696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028449758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060275257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474455555","doi":"","title":"'Lon Fuller's Legal Structuralism' from Standing Tall","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Principle of legality; Naturalism; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Law; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Reading (process); Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.016740489708908454,"score_gpt":0.3005492305789906,"score_spread":0.2838087408700821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474455555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01451626,0.008731342,0.010968881,0.2614225,0.001655199,0.00003106353,0.00015013758,0.00007892839,0.70244575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7260115,0.008306213,0.0070975292,0.08249656,0.0036939639,0.00023226625,0.00024167514,0.00028653603,0.17163377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802727,0.00063090667,0.000046909845,0.0002976497,0.000733303,0.00026390678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985915,0.00081256434,0.000091198315,0.00013132596,0.0002219678,0.00015142938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017083748,0.0004743055,0.0003820338,0.0012663672,0.0064285505,0.0068496335,0.0011956339,0.0055999346,0.011166569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004615939,0.00037342412,0.00039054838,0.0012263398,0.01798834,0.010613093,0.0032948942,0.0087455325,0.0008977896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037544776,0.0000035747726,0.000028631133,0.000011124775,5.2161977e-7,0.000016646232,0.0011285114,0.000026949972,0.000021951833,0.98273474,0.014228859,0.0017946295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016335534,0.000012871243,0.00034232225,0.00011862257,0.000003492484,0.00006963073,0.0018171829,0.00023755903,0.00008046377,0.69595236,0.30133542,0.000013762603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019210098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026444428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019210098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061818943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037478912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475854966","doi":"10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195390315.003.0003","title":"A Theory in Flux","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral rights; Tort; Political science; Law; Doctrine; Law and economics; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Compensation (psychology); Sociology; Intellectual property; Liability; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04465614926603625,"score_gpt":0.24266179554547998,"score_spread":0.19800564627944373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475854966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047276034,0.00391709,0.024480307,0.022859719,0.000849234,0.000043186763,0.00011992845,0.000087722874,0.94291526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60042024,0.006991165,0.02259054,0.009955045,0.0016949264,0.00043671476,0.0003768427,0.00039165004,0.35714287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977149,0.0011225886,0.00006234531,0.00051248184,0.00034851008,0.00023930165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987054,0.0006167734,0.00007158871,0.0002716106,0.00020769711,0.00012686684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026750662,0.0007135988,0.00069903163,0.0019061383,0.006472256,0.008714993,0.0014979751,0.0041506663,0.029742861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00369386,0.00032881176,0.00073767884,0.0017370905,0.025730563,0.013279535,0.004864884,0.004480687,0.00472992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019257438,0.0000026250054,0.000024666591,0.0000063072416,7.915985e-7,0.000012002235,0.00040890128,0.00004243515,0.000009601816,0.99668485,0.0015816133,0.0012242969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067008336,0.0000053809495,0.000046318237,0.000055648925,0.000002122834,0.000037363734,0.0006370401,0.00021352869,0.00003321352,0.8840123,0.114947185,0.0000031834375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035566809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026564368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029742861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071722763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039996095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09949982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479612070","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139059688.014","title":"INVASION OF CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; World Wide Web; Telecommunications; Internet privacy; Computer network; Mathematics","score_opus":0.033534117680876295,"score_gpt":0.2176090116891259,"score_spread":0.18407489400824958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479612070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061746826,0.010079206,0.00060838595,0.009607058,0.0011248499,0.000058967882,0.0014331492,0.00013167136,0.97078204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07278302,0.01175445,0.0008669251,0.0037669474,0.000100782534,0.000039655344,0.00087693793,0.000113636524,0.9096977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867827,0.0000471057,0.000017785787,0.000103587336,0.00067391386,0.0004792946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955577,0.0000292296,0.000013603661,0.000026817323,0.0002876965,0.00008697691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039161762,0.0006810455,0.0004849297,0.0014177449,0.010187698,0.0039001114,0.0011224273,0.0019313828,0.05467064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012864561,0.00029694973,0.0005057288,0.0023906196,0.0026900403,0.0010289939,0.0019670387,0.00268607,0.0048189596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044448025,0.000021776636,0.0019449105,0.0003307508,0.000022054943,0.00078413764,0.0032915715,0.00056811323,0.00085170596,0.26163447,0.62997293,0.10053317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019547206,0.000004181006,0.001757122,0.00009622156,0.000004363467,0.00009261969,0.0006755676,0.000077325494,0.00013546116,0.0016192746,0.9955236,0.000012328263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98013103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99222386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0552559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0552559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08478716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4009115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479651440","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232420.003.0007","title":"Set-asides in the United States and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.054079834073586075,"score_gpt":0.3100973634414129,"score_spread":0.25601752936782685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479651440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030388163,0.009600228,0.0011960554,0.017890647,0.0007249245,0.00007339875,0.00035225417,0.00007442404,0.9396999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49348915,0.011319446,0.0032061716,0.009159335,0.00013141686,0.000087412525,0.00045050494,0.00011252402,0.48204404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704546,0.0002155099,0.000058178546,0.00019195251,0.0016718718,0.0008171062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998346,0.00032837052,0.00003781647,0.00006034232,0.00091566413,0.00031178273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013526472,0.00029436577,0.00037430823,0.0019691275,0.014349455,0.0074531436,0.0017161629,0.002307023,0.013222499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029349322,0.0003537875,0.00037507317,0.00337086,0.0072813076,0.001640183,0.0023097456,0.0045629395,0.0006163721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010012095,0.000019671274,0.00043588245,0.000053171887,0.0000041385615,0.00016287738,0.006358446,0.0005308335,0.00016821233,0.91688734,0.049552783,0.025816515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008795156,0.000008624072,0.0026657975,0.00031225712,0.000008601714,0.00005098381,0.0041724034,0.00035797383,0.00028308475,0.022586504,0.96948874,0.000056224268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12826887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12826887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17615427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481934234","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.002","title":"Reflections regarding the diversity of ways in which the trust has been received or adapted in civil law countries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10699567017993528,"score_gpt":0.28000112012308087,"score_spread":0.1730054499431456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481934234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088032044,0.021839859,0.0041751205,0.30204877,0.0017432665,0.000033576584,0.00010963175,0.00003364951,0.58198404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90897423,0.0047121574,0.0013350055,0.023976512,0.00035432773,0.00005458785,0.000036598394,0.00012814383,0.0604284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810734,0.012881816,0.00062614103,0.0009925654,0.0016442996,0.00278181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98788595,0.008933508,0.0004810298,0.0009106357,0.0010953335,0.0006934992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019766515,0.00030504717,0.0005120477,0.0014753627,0.012834577,0.018794065,0.0017150833,0.009225644,0.007607262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021319326,0.0005814684,0.00033814233,0.003769967,0.052520085,0.022994954,0.0076165805,0.014236111,0.0007632159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010887135,0.0000054917723,0.00014735809,0.000029284325,0.000002392832,0.00014118775,0.10507168,0.000042585,0.00006281494,0.8734061,0.014875694,0.0062045134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014413746,0.000027898375,0.002719969,0.0007621378,0.00000982043,0.0005311971,0.22590931,0.00010766461,0.00039375952,0.22876957,0.54069066,0.00006362318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027325286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054052237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027325286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012650849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056177694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10453653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482915259","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511610394.002","title":"Evolution and the Common Law: An Introduction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020330339466685585,"score_gpt":0.23226274304935265,"score_spread":0.21193240358266707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482915259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056730555,0.30237517,0.021496924,0.04251194,0.005550586,0.00010113136,0.00028170113,0.000104134844,0.62190545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24630894,0.37824792,0.02213145,0.028690588,0.018041221,0.00044361743,0.00071583077,0.0002848375,0.30513567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959093,0.00017075469,0.00001848225,0.00007255164,0.00010042642,0.00004679263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933714,0.000473729,0.000025885218,0.000036311616,0.00007835766,0.000048535712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067532837,0.0006111489,0.0005175077,0.0019789264,0.0016741938,0.0030565902,0.0010269607,0.0025439686,0.01308611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013041451,0.00028508084,0.0004900811,0.0020410984,0.006447498,0.004646574,0.0016634357,0.0028556678,0.0018136374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062142576,0.000021641952,0.00026856887,0.00013876731,0.000004408359,0.00012445761,0.0008795224,0.00040057956,0.000082709375,0.93430823,0.039931517,0.023833394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035532473,0.000019099274,0.0006699951,0.00038219828,0.0000031209618,0.00021617457,0.00043993397,0.00034361388,0.000031751337,0.4744715,0.5234103,0.000008657763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043923347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004475893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01308611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037929758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012575585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043777406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483794208","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579853.003.0004","title":"Property Rights Created under Statute in Common Law Legal Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Common law; Law; Legislature; Political science; Legislative intent; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.03531559398762169,"score_gpt":0.29794608716264204,"score_spread":0.26263049317502035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483794208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025555337,0.0037440492,0.062136065,0.0047874516,0.00020742202,0.000111600064,0.00018903236,0.0001536513,0.9031154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9019387,0.0028646837,0.022828469,0.0011411399,0.00039961646,0.00025301933,0.00032415162,0.00008033659,0.070169844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595165,0.0016287396,0.00023221318,0.00038149656,0.001399809,0.00040614727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628687,0.0022055125,0.00028738967,0.00076572516,0.00031712634,0.00013740327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005124154,0.00024718078,0.0004495751,0.0024543947,0.0028367215,0.010413546,0.0012325969,0.0024272904,0.0074175764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046330504,0.00039580322,0.00058214046,0.00310261,0.028304223,0.009175651,0.004420067,0.0035076279,0.0009315006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5422027e-7,0.0000016526885,0.00001786213,0.0000039261436,5.038483e-7,0.0000068562167,0.00026054902,0.000097559976,0.000026679021,0.9983909,0.00023483393,0.0009581082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048537136,0.000005091127,0.00012007243,0.000063240965,0.0000031871493,0.000032296473,0.00015541668,0.0005297,0.00014938269,0.9579504,0.040979575,0.0000066820076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065408386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004615387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010413546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058465647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004047566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04241997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487019157","doi":"10.4018/978-1-61520-615-5.ch005","title":"Trust, Loyalty, and ECommerce","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Fiduciary; Loyalty; Vitality; Curiosity; Institution; Business; Value (mathematics); E-commerce; Public relations; Marketing; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Duty; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.024314434281616004,"score_gpt":0.29902500509627333,"score_spread":0.27471057081465733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487019157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030133635,0.070055,0.0053944876,0.030910991,0.00062932016,0.000033289318,0.00004495856,0.00004022618,0.8627581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7932827,0.048044432,0.0025071045,0.004771296,0.0006908837,0.000064788765,0.000053146392,0.000027901116,0.15055773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991836,0.0003941263,0.000026018119,0.00006828371,0.0002083502,0.00011974122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926656,0.00040966985,0.00007981637,0.000040031857,0.000091526585,0.000112447226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000872844,0.00024590065,0.00022427712,0.0006616218,0.0016986851,0.007087796,0.0004570675,0.0022350259,0.0050996784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014010452,0.0001633413,0.00015326442,0.0014002835,0.0062533375,0.0039318614,0.0014473269,0.0019420442,0.00073728134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008644528,0.000022464557,0.00047524032,0.0000685819,0.0000046929167,0.0000744468,0.002001597,0.00015462821,0.000064243286,0.9484028,0.00869618,0.040026452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011251405,0.000053612584,0.0033861536,0.0005819,0.000014949679,0.0004424975,0.0038921738,0.0010853795,0.00013516238,0.73647404,0.25389925,0.000023630526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059841354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006939368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007087796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033347432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002142766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024195373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488611260","doi":"10.29173/alr315","title":"Once More Unto the Breach: James v. British Columbia and Problems with the Duty of Care in Canadian Tort Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Tort; Duty; Common law; Liability; Statutory law; Duty of care; Appeal; English law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.013749291681109168,"score_gpt":0.2587432813250898,"score_spread":0.24499398964398061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488611260","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06813489,0.027629115,0.0017176579,0.5991358,0.001946599,0.00009443704,0.0005142417,0.00010329414,0.30072403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66915953,0.0122111775,0.0020806806,0.19730864,0.0004666374,0.00007012001,0.0001698197,0.00013839174,0.11839499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452376,0.0006679835,0.00015062354,0.0006315818,0.0021627955,0.0018632892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496317,0.0016395916,0.00024836304,0.00014703954,0.0018314443,0.0011703952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032066565,0.0005595957,0.0004729126,0.002339212,0.03666463,0.012566469,0.003444465,0.012856006,0.006823729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00912624,0.00069529837,0.00045203656,0.003669375,0.012861125,0.003874699,0.0028402898,0.013315071,0.0004904914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000813841,0.000054490713,0.012203674,0.0002816845,0.000045413253,0.002586093,0.052160233,0.0006156218,0.00081892556,0.5288433,0.36067426,0.041635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054823005,0.000037445025,0.032124866,0.001012731,0.00014911451,0.0008435748,0.057082962,0.0011060974,0.00071959855,0.04242772,0.8638899,0.00055128697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99929214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12449083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12449083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15548651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9032484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489387897","doi":"10.1017/s1060150315000649","title":"JEKYLL AND HYDE, INC.: LIMITED LIABILITY, COMPANIFICATION, AND GOTHIC SUBJECTIVITY","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian Literature and Culture","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Limited liability; Power (physics); Law; Subjectivity; Liability; Parliament; Drama; Speculation; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Finance; Politics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.009456527145270328,"score_gpt":0.2628297726419514,"score_spread":0.25337324549668105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489387897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015088019,0.11184366,0.0011952206,0.14186455,0.0038425347,0.000020485015,0.00005404737,0.00005404376,0.7260375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38184127,0.041472614,0.00085423584,0.028377052,0.002593872,0.00005700141,0.00003935714,0.00014830202,0.5446162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992556,0.0003231338,0.00002791591,0.00009937491,0.00017572401,0.00011828329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948764,0.0002683848,0.000048987753,0.000053184838,0.00007088806,0.00007089969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010303785,0.00028618835,0.00019480327,0.0007323885,0.007608198,0.0066095763,0.000518178,0.0029944486,0.006773734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018818546,0.0002407365,0.00011229544,0.0006988791,0.019176353,0.0045567323,0.002783199,0.0046276883,0.0011639423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009138716,0.000009940496,0.0001591458,0.000046938814,0.0000018052474,0.00016527364,0.02572301,0.000029824147,0.000074319185,0.8629362,0.09573594,0.015108343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027926726,0.000004974343,0.00038921312,0.00025336002,0.0000017291152,0.00014461056,0.007965449,0.000036775473,0.00010196995,0.048716497,0.9423758,0.000006735044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026992965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05788665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026992965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057385275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033340442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053671718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491522810","doi":"10.29173/alr166","title":"Compensation Where No Land Is Taken: Update of the Law in Alberta","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Nuisance; Compensation (psychology); Government (linguistics); Common law; Law; Population; Economics; Public use; Business; Public land; Public economics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01705568192229471,"score_gpt":0.30090799569150023,"score_spread":0.2838523137692055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491522810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085146986,0.18909584,0.0061846348,0.19042943,0.010359903,0.0006383485,0.0032215205,0.0006724369,0.51425093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3935462,0.12274873,0.012715419,0.06081363,0.002266665,0.00016463854,0.002082073,0.00021062267,0.40545198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142015,0.0004284648,0.00048708965,0.00051567756,0.0062028877,0.00094572094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98532873,0.0034060767,0.0005847175,0.00040037683,0.0093581835,0.00092195196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009050927,0.00039367654,0.0006232326,0.005222469,0.0049421056,0.0077753,0.0045629092,0.006370802,0.0036341508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010868858,0.0007957682,0.0005285988,0.005874209,0.004678915,0.0014084445,0.0018107591,0.0039292662,0.00052835775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010025724,0.00024122842,0.012294847,0.0011146016,0.000059672984,0.0025072035,0.0053969026,0.006342507,0.0025026298,0.28634036,0.39637598,0.28672388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023760978,0.000045740813,0.019480351,0.0006232856,0.00005057164,0.00023379562,0.0012250915,0.0009117965,0.0005022599,0.00401981,0.97278816,0.00009549264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97206724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08921837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08921837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15279348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6473276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493137966","doi":"10.29173/alr116","title":"The Law of Nuisance in Canada, Gregory S Pun &amp; Margaret I Hall (Markham, Ont: LexisNexis, 2010)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jungle; Nuisance; Law; Metaphor; Sociology; Common law; English law; Law and economics; Political science; History; Philosophy; Archaeology; Theology","score_opus":0.0376371735577754,"score_gpt":0.3053399698687162,"score_spread":0.2677027963109408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493137966","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032625687,0.56457204,0.0007002117,0.21413966,0.0040023685,0.000069039736,0.0008043427,0.00009757607,0.21235228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.153084,0.2581744,0.0017689453,0.08629165,0.0016711389,0.00012767361,0.0005138215,0.00014377173,0.49822462],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667335,0.00038607419,0.00010441579,0.00028585884,0.0017958939,0.0007544446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818206,0.00044303984,0.00007807936,0.000061397805,0.00092366536,0.000311841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002181233,0.0009197123,0.00050699536,0.0022236418,0.015199574,0.0074431323,0.0022338522,0.0075792246,0.009748889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005559225,0.0008877982,0.0004524308,0.0036671862,0.010011911,0.003295046,0.0015784935,0.0053451466,0.0015565768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016564756,0.000026450089,0.0008829541,0.0002491299,0.000015178077,0.00022906205,0.0028422645,0.0002508737,0.00012968988,0.17182605,0.79602873,0.027503015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009219773,0.000006490015,0.005573667,0.0005129979,0.000017089375,0.0000792279,0.0022049379,0.00011429597,0.00010620313,0.016208041,0.9751262,0.000041628115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99647754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10092175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10092175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17486155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.732242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493565389","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.008","title":"The securityfiduciein French law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024670168825995754,"score_gpt":0.22849679944435586,"score_spread":0.2038266306183601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493565389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070367944,0.051259037,0.003063413,0.057474762,0.0016575712,0.000015790603,0.00013014296,0.000082563274,0.8792799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23433407,0.026438612,0.0014268507,0.00895512,0.0030321064,0.00007799175,0.00012086788,0.00013612345,0.7254783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826956,0.0007771598,0.000037552887,0.00020346232,0.00039372634,0.00031836194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994159,0.00031574903,0.000031847,0.000054999247,0.00013373379,0.000047887137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001742918,0.0010914677,0.0006398046,0.0023768356,0.006521551,0.011242244,0.00070130406,0.0059138355,0.02246897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023582096,0.00044573395,0.00063875783,0.0017684578,0.009468439,0.004212843,0.002243486,0.006257647,0.0030956122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063065745,0.0000069548655,0.00007482414,0.000017398086,0.0000026750715,0.00005211023,0.0011533041,0.00008935664,0.000070573486,0.95738155,0.033262927,0.007881866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075124412,0.000010783193,0.00060684513,0.00015453012,0.0000042875117,0.00009277861,0.0008381641,0.0002510897,0.0001168774,0.10975672,0.8881472,0.000013124052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118868865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07540183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118868865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020600885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072103203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23635393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495502803","doi":"10.29173/alr384","title":"The Civil and Criminal Applications of the Identification Doctrine: Arguments for Harmonization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Tort; Corporation; Political science; Criminal law; Legislature; Plaintiff; Liability","score_opus":0.04534310154453545,"score_gpt":0.3491378639155135,"score_spread":0.303794762370978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495502803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038273387,0.022746101,0.07393013,0.14867704,0.0012852097,0.00026863505,0.000083657425,0.00005561318,0.71468025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299948,0.007516639,0.016342241,0.02340472,0.0017535617,0.0007086175,0.000062916384,0.000045617762,0.020170882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9723846,0.0134819,0.0011007458,0.0023413522,0.008215417,0.002476046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790151,0.014911108,0.0017373392,0.0018125721,0.0019373231,0.00058653514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024173312,0.0005466604,0.0012771642,0.004901673,0.0075162635,0.008811451,0.003502054,0.0138097415,0.0034344282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030323094,0.0008018547,0.0016036624,0.0038631891,0.0962269,0.012995341,0.010182843,0.011568287,0.00065280875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010259578,0.000004202978,0.000029139303,0.0000047053436,0.0000011858865,0.000008584687,0.00017577036,0.00003407857,0.000004212576,0.99851686,0.0002907963,0.00092957605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014153116,0.000012479972,0.0002711434,0.000078141,0.000005000057,0.00004187523,0.00040257556,0.00027150643,0.0000615573,0.9787049,0.020127645,0.0000090387675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008923133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006714337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024173312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010192594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015732516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12784219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496543964","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2016.1203499","title":"Judging gender in tort thresholds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.0708364353783264,"score_gpt":0.36428694832983216,"score_spread":0.29345051295150576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496543964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70563865,0.0013629105,0.044709474,0.0059250956,0.00044988547,0.00059869373,0.00022261414,0.000085804444,0.24100697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929126,0.00010720453,0.003942394,0.00025766421,0.0000437694,0.0001057582,0.00003652923,0.000022666809,0.0025713253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9523995,0.027503196,0.0020675457,0.002562649,0.013654726,0.0018123089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86529297,0.09384151,0.012584822,0.0048671933,0.021355784,0.0020576706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038129453,0.00046225093,0.0004942648,0.0057154805,0.004134791,0.007970605,0.0017661847,0.0015572646,0.013051232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17441273,0.00043276578,0.00040346273,0.0023993899,0.013703676,0.0071050753,0.0053340723,0.0018022071,0.000856353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008344459,0.00029323794,0.12656498,0.0004691192,0.00005740124,0.00083405804,0.20451593,0.0019966145,0.005691132,0.4656184,0.008579529,0.1845452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000760909,0.00072124775,0.2647443,0.0020909521,0.00011518392,0.00076030457,0.15970498,0.01932289,0.018187443,0.44577768,0.0882436,0.0002553311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059268284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075626504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038129453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008883212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002657205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2016502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497077290","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834.004","title":"Promises and Contracts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.035064701219600314,"score_gpt":0.24134710661895353,"score_spread":0.20628240539935322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497077290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004256586,0.015374173,0.026857173,0.024426004,0.00059704506,0.000042081843,0.000090117624,0.00006068588,0.9282962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6248412,0.023761753,0.018730827,0.010581158,0.0020857912,0.00036607892,0.00017365572,0.0002066075,0.31925294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938783,0.003541238,0.00018491076,0.0005351323,0.0014000798,0.00046032298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997364,0.0017637792,0.00016658507,0.0002897125,0.00027162425,0.00014422566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004415011,0.0005149971,0.0004918189,0.0012229803,0.0036627916,0.007340224,0.0009496051,0.004142477,0.01708676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067553674,0.00040996043,0.0004242318,0.002320124,0.02193353,0.013437672,0.0033731114,0.004938864,0.0022845329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012098893,0.0000011871477,0.0000074028308,0.000008545841,3.8993943e-7,0.00000625056,0.00018862201,0.000039754574,0.0000066636567,0.9971148,0.0014113261,0.0012138657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003066521,0.000005883423,0.000058701156,0.000069714,0.0000011260045,0.000042486958,0.00034114334,0.00016997782,0.000027973136,0.89890546,0.100370646,0.000003845886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00443491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032772382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01708676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006505129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035839959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057160974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498276595","doi":"10.29173/alr111","title":"Limits on the Operation of Exclusion Clauses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Exclusion clause; Limit (mathematics); Liability; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Economics; Business; Contract management; Management","score_opus":0.07762358430294075,"score_gpt":0.36618732342403915,"score_spread":0.2885637391210984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498276595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05794664,0.0066894493,0.12656826,0.026926693,0.00087082194,0.00044774156,0.00019097883,0.0001885815,0.7801708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275152,0.003193712,0.025155842,0.01209101,0.0009918708,0.0007031492,0.00011199966,0.0001514916,0.03008563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95498574,0.013015311,0.0038722611,0.0037785019,0.019126238,0.0052219965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9264023,0.054694515,0.0047484557,0.0058648633,0.007447181,0.00084271317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031923573,0.0006253431,0.0010246577,0.0030226028,0.0064604315,0.010178595,0.0041401326,0.010601078,0.0054743136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06942231,0.001118712,0.0012283495,0.0018107031,0.02512584,0.012393206,0.0075767427,0.011336135,0.00089432375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005123292,0.0000070943493,0.00021461475,0.000017697275,0.0000038508642,0.00008381446,0.000688765,0.00018452453,0.000115746705,0.99561584,0.00069596444,0.0023669705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003861316,0.000029445915,0.00078026816,0.0006972138,0.000044085384,0.00028099405,0.001180459,0.0011378631,0.0011195168,0.9000257,0.09460251,0.000063304054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013570962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009932929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031923573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00547258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012482315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16883004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502130114","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511494956.011","title":"Insolvency of investment manager","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Investment (military); Business; Position (finance); Finance; Investment management; Financial services; Scheme (mathematics); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03320194137888519,"score_gpt":0.23985359134283085,"score_spread":0.20665164996394567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502130114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020790242,0.01190578,0.0015655495,0.019262273,0.0024888918,0.000027355558,0.00003589208,0.0001050248,0.96253026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04011256,0.0045869956,0.0007011995,0.0073600314,0.0008679451,0.000032511503,0.00003714917,0.00008826156,0.94621336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849176,0.00034992755,0.000054362477,0.0002592168,0.00056773366,0.00027690444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989926,0.00028243533,0.00008813009,0.00009646657,0.00032647263,0.00021393556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013190698,0.00041974633,0.00035757382,0.00061930605,0.0024444598,0.0045835073,0.00068653346,0.0021618416,0.032953046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028288742,0.00030134807,0.0001825211,0.0005335568,0.0018297117,0.002791394,0.0012449552,0.0031669994,0.013119092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002017282,0.000025096933,0.0002508058,0.00006273184,0.000003626071,0.0003359845,0.0017601022,0.00008123284,0.0003115791,0.5359398,0.41848642,0.042722438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019100628,0.0000048535635,0.00012169302,0.000044142143,0.0000012381397,0.00017813577,0.00016461861,0.000050867027,0.00006119822,0.006039137,0.99332917,0.0000031325756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026355067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071329046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032953046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027387738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021727516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11023897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502320974","doi":"10.29173/alr168","title":"The Law of Domicile: Re Foote Estate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Jurisdiction; Law; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Common law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02012465741582258,"score_gpt":0.33633626881922135,"score_spread":0.31621161140339876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502320974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041681394,0.086029574,0.0022875099,0.105182365,0.0023476407,0.00010484431,0.00031841814,0.00007549146,0.7619728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5801996,0.019851092,0.0013092621,0.03632176,0.0005688184,0.000052473322,0.0001282516,0.00003695873,0.36153176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667287,0.00046492156,0.00007673104,0.00036273155,0.001611613,0.000811147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989748,0.00038112878,0.00007657884,0.00005862803,0.0003240894,0.00018488524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022022757,0.00034365527,0.00029377674,0.0011463009,0.007366585,0.006940248,0.0014610445,0.007340627,0.0045874706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00438902,0.00041842676,0.00029627868,0.0011892023,0.006382037,0.0022962661,0.0018764427,0.005583075,0.0007746251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016922993,0.000018456378,0.0015320968,0.000072720955,0.000008055954,0.00077086064,0.00425265,0.00022726743,0.00029187,0.8332334,0.13892782,0.020647844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019376099,0.000028178136,0.00796207,0.00038956833,0.000018871937,0.00043988827,0.0044129654,0.00020779345,0.00049958803,0.03795734,0.94799966,0.00006477508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77158034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9006036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22841966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024492877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028473087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4595297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502479164","doi":"10.1057/9781137562357_4","title":"Can Women Be Householders?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Aotearoa; Property (philosophy); Marital status; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.04047138215298013,"score_gpt":0.27162443801814573,"score_spread":0.2311530558651656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502479164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008158224,0.044951312,0.00054150965,0.11395242,0.003987092,0.000028013543,0.000089386034,0.000047688965,0.8282444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21704145,0.023445271,0.0003056945,0.03154539,0.0015223502,0.000069742724,0.00007442115,0.000061554136,0.7259342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924207,0.0003200829,0.000013487809,0.00008137162,0.00011914074,0.00022386685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997292,0.00010006561,0.000020116988,0.00002991366,0.000041270097,0.00007946998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010783724,0.00033560087,0.0002790321,0.00045754138,0.0064394446,0.004535436,0.0005172927,0.0019195097,0.030267691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021037783,0.00025616662,0.0001609474,0.00056439545,0.008374115,0.006073085,0.0023112393,0.0022433354,0.005081977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020263044,0.000017209031,0.00071552664,0.00006583302,0.0000025619638,0.00021886092,0.037312247,0.000015425047,0.000057451696,0.65629494,0.25974658,0.045533195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022402478,0.000004864773,0.0003433481,0.00013097344,0.0000011738165,0.00007689368,0.01188069,0.0000073787137,0.000025358971,0.01640339,0.9711212,0.0000024625201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02039395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035849612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030267691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002756048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021754473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10125548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504542205","doi":"10.29173/alr133","title":"&lt;i&gt;The Snail and the Ginger Beer: The Singular Case of&lt;/i&gt; Donoghue v Stevenson, Matthew Chapman (London: Wildy, Simmonds &amp; Hill, 2010)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Watson; Context (archaeology); History; Philosophy; Political science; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.03549541171765587,"score_gpt":0.28228039266319577,"score_spread":0.2467849809455399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504542205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024301518,0.10692916,0.0007522844,0.4174226,0.0039018565,0.000071590715,0.000115963856,0.000037157886,0.4464679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50956255,0.028645553,0.0006085725,0.32394376,0.001744135,0.000108160646,0.000055941437,0.000044105935,0.13528724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722517,0.00073009176,0.000113306,0.00040570827,0.0008376029,0.00068819255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855405,0.0007496911,0.0001506959,0.00007002626,0.00016786672,0.00030764192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002242131,0.00039715026,0.00042406868,0.00069303357,0.009848745,0.0046773204,0.0015888233,0.015103814,0.002530242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056681745,0.0004918353,0.0004951273,0.00085529377,0.015517919,0.0033150245,0.0027514112,0.008624207,0.00042845856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025876785,0.000031507352,0.0013240369,0.0001756786,0.000015707148,0.0042854836,0.013171929,0.00008179121,0.00036025912,0.5710874,0.39887416,0.010566186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029508838,0.000030483607,0.0040026675,0.0009262413,0.000033618424,0.0024303617,0.01236419,0.0001153498,0.00034020032,0.06402725,0.91563904,0.00006112828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3214459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48121688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3214459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009874497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014087589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6391498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506600944","doi":"","title":"The 'Fusion' of Law and Equity?: A Canadian Perspective on the Substantive, Jurisdictional, or Non-Fusion of Legal and Equitable Matters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Equity (law); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Court of equity; Common law; Fiduciary; Constructive trust; Duty; Law and economics; Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.016581598221619996,"score_gpt":0.30533649936837537,"score_spread":0.2887549011467554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506600944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026543902,0.030513398,0.0071649184,0.2426586,0.0007927322,0.00007801939,0.00022780227,0.000053851676,0.6919668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8964204,0.019715346,0.0074361544,0.02199324,0.0004463846,0.000062519255,0.000090126,0.00008715348,0.053748734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912547,0.0013857418,0.00014161158,0.00081768946,0.0035810347,0.0028192224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634933,0.0011719508,0.00021240878,0.0001855709,0.0014440065,0.0006367394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046078567,0.00072396453,0.00082307076,0.0061677117,0.030305833,0.019624026,0.0034453508,0.007247594,0.005342896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073681027,0.0005937118,0.00072815764,0.007708515,0.06616137,0.010854074,0.0061476757,0.00945861,0.00036400816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005191076,0.0000035675903,0.00020864737,0.000017934533,0.0000022254667,0.000062906,0.0050761844,0.00013291887,0.00004318397,0.9852808,0.0050846944,0.0040817973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024050809,0.00001728305,0.004538719,0.00052062084,0.000033505377,0.00024947533,0.022795174,0.0017768787,0.00030442342,0.53603065,0.43359163,0.000117669515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99068004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99095625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22910544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22910544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22455116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89412844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507533780","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783169.003.0014","title":"A Comparative Reflection from Canada—A Good Faith Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Tort; Statutory law; Law; Unfair dismissal; Common law; Faith; Political science; Damages; Labour law; Bad faith; Sociology; Law and economics; Liability","score_opus":0.057863781318367495,"score_gpt":0.339086548127969,"score_spread":0.2812227668096015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507533780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101665735,0.021688629,0.0017711172,0.12793796,0.0011775704,0.0000792611,0.0004709603,0.00006175905,0.74514693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8749102,0.010087589,0.0009630405,0.013787692,0.0001322793,0.000034358953,0.00010876361,0.00008086603,0.099895336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485105,0.0010722002,0.000075788266,0.00035921612,0.0017437005,0.0018980281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510103,0.0017512472,0.00014246171,0.00015239314,0.0019258724,0.00092698284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032353958,0.0004245322,0.00056287594,0.0032564371,0.037132215,0.013457275,0.0022163992,0.0036899047,0.011379982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056921407,0.00042376335,0.0004259116,0.007057918,0.01940068,0.0034996036,0.003696367,0.0058462126,0.0004481118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024941335,0.000027703227,0.001230156,0.00018918779,0.000009888851,0.0010864234,0.1274388,0.00031581635,0.00024829994,0.7889689,0.058026455,0.022433328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006789637,0.00001233455,0.004041753,0.0005009574,0.000017382315,0.00021913674,0.13435231,0.0002582663,0.00026712226,0.015927095,0.8443394,0.000057596615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23060521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23060521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18105164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8923889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507763840","doi":"10.29173/alr49","title":"Corporate Foreign Corrupt Practices and Director Liability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Liability; Corporation; Business; Face (sociological concept); Jurisprudence; Corporate law; Law; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.07389278427639404,"score_gpt":0.3568242234808464,"score_spread":0.2829314392044524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507763840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045620374,0.07634538,0.00339283,0.05073595,0.00055978785,0.000052800297,0.000088251494,0.000054444474,0.82315016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8769869,0.046046454,0.001240768,0.011167493,0.00043889123,0.000018789091,0.000055334498,0.000018142331,0.06402706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288416,0.0012763067,0.00016633752,0.00043426902,0.0035417497,0.0016973206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960614,0.0014636572,0.0006635739,0.00015280303,0.0013355627,0.0003230034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028857093,0.0002693841,0.00026032838,0.0028481283,0.0076613775,0.0072350684,0.000949702,0.0034862226,0.0036677313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007054307,0.00024045251,0.00032733235,0.0025530655,0.014124108,0.0018466024,0.0020184298,0.0024558732,0.00030581566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053521917,0.000009665897,0.002890895,0.00010122149,0.000007872458,0.0004525194,0.00456591,0.00065424474,0.000118971104,0.9572472,0.013217897,0.020728253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014793383,0.000041252577,0.025673445,0.00152054,0.000058862897,0.0011704052,0.015299723,0.0008085368,0.0005614062,0.12462231,0.83013177,0.00009702001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74488753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85015655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74488753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033308577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04657342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5132297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508860223","doi":"10.7202/1040054ar","title":"Struggling Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative Law? Recent Cases on Standard of Review and Reasonableness","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Administrative law; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); CLARITY; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10968278335432045,"score_gpt":0.40261673163454215,"score_spread":0.2929339482802217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508860223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0795927,0.027068254,0.011444628,0.5795721,0.0018743324,0.00026806266,0.0003780093,0.00017326816,0.29962862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906308,0.0076112216,0.0072240946,0.07003377,0.00072545855,0.00012383485,0.00020184458,0.00008414841,0.02336482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9145345,0.014426733,0.0039893594,0.0066676806,0.04670192,0.013679776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9134379,0.039306756,0.0051535163,0.003889796,0.033554006,0.004658057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041310836,0.0004482677,0.00105413,0.006724658,0.036955602,0.025524484,0.006111255,0.013230763,0.0021059287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12763609,0.0012682594,0.0014655195,0.010511828,0.034868043,0.0069841305,0.006886823,0.014720278,0.00025198603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019161078,0.000011906044,0.0016321887,0.00009589104,0.000023625757,0.0003657085,0.010128771,0.00068512035,0.00020349193,0.9503882,0.023886157,0.012559835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099991885,0.000062991894,0.025228217,0.00091494207,0.00016517364,0.0004974909,0.016662184,0.0034901742,0.0008635691,0.20501655,0.74634725,0.0006515286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9822969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76784164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23215836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28075013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89058745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509711261","doi":"","title":"Wonky Walden: The Dizzying New Personal Jurisdiction Rule","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal jurisdiction; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.022800502214303207,"score_gpt":0.28660894441633705,"score_spread":0.26380844220203387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509711261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023802122,0.0058337734,0.020132132,0.06333529,0.0018619372,0.000072215706,0.00022202377,0.00015091721,0.8845895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75939566,0.0024969638,0.0075352644,0.044580426,0.0016622575,0.00023968761,0.0001463533,0.00016893233,0.18377444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304575,0.0015652373,0.00034410975,0.0015356634,0.002577772,0.0009315082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972922,0.0015252442,0.00014334022,0.00041655367,0.00046747242,0.00015515115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054884055,0.0003941294,0.000508557,0.0009513194,0.0062175025,0.007546869,0.0025018419,0.008122615,0.011554401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011139752,0.0004721192,0.00061397493,0.0008242862,0.012989092,0.008531197,0.004077503,0.010560908,0.0016301133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040654713,0.000004218384,0.000065360575,0.000008338783,0.0000013285742,0.000065867425,0.00031011595,0.000049240858,0.000049141832,0.98961383,0.007680367,0.0021481297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019431147,0.000020866308,0.00046499504,0.00027302417,0.000021176156,0.0002708557,0.00054557284,0.0010177373,0.00045209914,0.71553224,0.28133896,0.00004304916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026670616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029051213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026670616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049462747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003922311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05303073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510821039","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n7p219","title":"Attribution of Liability among Multiple Tortfeasors under Negligence Law: Causation in Iran and England","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Tort; Joint and several liability; Liability; Law; Attribution; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Strict liability; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Public law; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03377915531114129,"score_gpt":0.3104368393400408,"score_spread":0.2766576840288995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510821039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802546,0.000547367,0.0011477721,0.0019037391,0.000023764069,0.000028628685,0.000026131627,0.000004854483,0.016063152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882835,0.0001505102,0.00015296337,0.00005986294,0.000008337101,0.000003462941,0.000009508601,6.624618e-7,0.0007863554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713516,0.0008785451,0.00021801789,0.00032703218,0.0008255443,0.00061569596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951199,0.0018892565,0.0018629142,0.00027199727,0.00062266266,0.00023322608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024638015,0.00013595217,0.00026019587,0.0020858282,0.0024360674,0.0018674023,0.00058849604,0.0008731825,0.0036099143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008907779,0.00023075058,0.000301706,0.0011954363,0.0032681045,0.0017777467,0.0021942528,0.0009798491,0.00016601948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013303844,0.00026363553,0.6216364,0.00012262072,0.0000663275,0.010442048,0.078238554,0.0008338042,0.00066125806,0.23967707,0.00243236,0.04549283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044054785,0.00021389993,0.7566007,0.00033904004,0.00014425226,0.010460043,0.12253318,0.0056343437,0.0009712882,0.07058744,0.032387022,0.000084757216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020129386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021318842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020129386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034093168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025208604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04002446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511272172","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttw152","title":"Disputes over trusts that hold corporate structures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tellabs (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Accounting; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Corporate law; Law; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.07366499281904929,"score_gpt":0.31689014255319004,"score_spread":0.24322514973414075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511272172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3366146,0.0036916863,0.048411492,0.048767615,0.00045777447,0.00017253628,0.00010914205,0.00008732405,0.56168777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882655,0.00040594567,0.00085795147,0.0017271318,0.00013808432,0.00003145699,0.000014024164,0.00001572486,0.008544091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96427566,0.01475383,0.0028010523,0.0033114555,0.007902897,0.0069551766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91303396,0.059182175,0.010074857,0.0071681454,0.0071733356,0.0033675751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027429217,0.00030984243,0.0008243175,0.0012272694,0.0118695125,0.015511523,0.0021313974,0.013766881,0.0056589744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09100775,0.00094019243,0.00093727716,0.0020347135,0.023753399,0.016056161,0.008572483,0.0084873615,0.0006749166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018340163,0.000010381114,0.0010520171,0.000022010545,0.000013661916,0.00066595274,0.008468376,0.0002776463,0.00013984999,0.984916,0.00180576,0.0026101517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105984516,0.00011437015,0.0034425107,0.00054030324,0.00011236508,0.0018385621,0.026408473,0.0036600037,0.0012312812,0.82249945,0.1398799,0.00016677298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020813696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014418631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027429217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009989218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008414454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14506131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511484456","doi":"","title":"Mind the Justificatory Gap: Fairness in Administrative Law through the Rule of Law as a Normative Exercise in Reviewing Regulated Conduct","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Jurisdiction; Normative; Political science; Legislature; Law; Enforcement; Law and economics; Action (physics); Administrative law; Judicial review; Economics","score_opus":0.07608987764947035,"score_gpt":0.35794748623236267,"score_spread":0.2818576085828923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511484456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09071624,0.008434351,0.20680428,0.18546294,0.0014364817,0.0004874038,0.00006476184,0.00018170012,0.50641185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420644,0.0014153427,0.031004943,0.006532727,0.00052802975,0.00020163659,0.000019898825,0.00007712273,0.01815576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95956165,0.022989955,0.0017567626,0.0033587385,0.009908769,0.0024241046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94836706,0.036380548,0.0028132899,0.0043108836,0.006994897,0.0011334629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052099183,0.00035679885,0.00066630467,0.0023080034,0.011326391,0.018279068,0.0025334237,0.009035514,0.0025189682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08214595,0.0005498226,0.00065165287,0.0015813757,0.07102633,0.014550914,0.0047225924,0.0088187745,0.0003832907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073788483,0.000012072244,0.0003709301,0.000029873536,0.000004028415,0.00005667358,0.009185346,0.00036404264,0.00012118471,0.98056257,0.0015712199,0.007714663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021650581,0.000026484378,0.0013754914,0.0003310682,0.000024264687,0.00008973206,0.007227278,0.0014248118,0.0005844651,0.9274299,0.06142818,0.00003654778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052982002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08482656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052982002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021267096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040971965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2755301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512672195","doi":"10.1086/233437","title":"Book ReviewsPatricia Smith, .<i>Liberalism and Affirmative Obligation</i>. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Pp. 271. $49.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Obligation; Liberalism; Download; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.06357273097434996,"score_gpt":0.3112157524176009,"score_spread":0.24764302144325095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512672195","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037305654,0.6666071,0.0014298491,0.064800225,0.02492793,0.00006829307,0.0015919682,0.00025057848,0.23995106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038145247,0.54735816,0.0012462791,0.019742591,0.018388389,0.00008911636,0.0016923866,0.0002644735,0.40740407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994711,0.000079153826,0.000031035925,0.0000665708,0.00031036267,0.000041803967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770963,0.00093071314,0.00013853383,0.0000677093,0.0010256061,0.0001278019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005223687,0.0011549812,0.00094199425,0.0031288245,0.0009889548,0.0024061324,0.0012024598,0.0015645504,0.09443153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031182976,0.00047680666,0.00044464308,0.0053109075,0.00080374384,0.003546249,0.0006804558,0.0021828513,0.05121235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003386891,0.0000056544873,0.000019868596,0.00019851938,0.0000019963704,0.000012816537,0.000044290042,0.000026104424,0.000028145188,0.0023461173,0.97520626,0.022106905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025325905,0.000004464428,0.0002102014,0.00039887195,0.0000034484906,0.000085337175,0.00004430195,0.000020001235,0.00003748222,0.0019821685,0.99720675,0.000004374043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023046963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09443153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022176986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021620905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31590492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513289806","doi":"10.29173/alr10","title":"Twelve Bottles of Whiskey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Certiorari; Political science; History; Supreme court","score_opus":0.020492149470864654,"score_gpt":0.32721678579358565,"score_spread":0.306724636322721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513289806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047944084,0.07797703,0.007990297,0.12969027,0.0045830407,0.00013310756,0.0002405871,0.00024396692,0.7311976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62801,0.018709822,0.0034861101,0.030956734,0.0014113691,0.000068016765,0.00006669885,0.0000962398,0.3171951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99200517,0.0013426321,0.00027965778,0.0010270225,0.0040380904,0.0013073771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467456,0.002079383,0.00039607752,0.00044533043,0.0019074604,0.00049718044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040544593,0.00023822283,0.00039968622,0.0018022396,0.008432347,0.009123684,0.0008413305,0.003608311,0.005957335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011627134,0.00045537017,0.00039842137,0.001282364,0.01955828,0.0035886033,0.0040268,0.0048240367,0.0009527004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003897417,0.000012768497,0.0009975232,0.00010872833,0.000009997049,0.00020094476,0.005739099,0.00017228663,0.0003431024,0.90497893,0.03705546,0.050342225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099034305,0.00003376255,0.0023646506,0.00039430376,0.000013033938,0.00016145135,0.0026080871,0.00009582915,0.00038644756,0.06059274,0.9332975,0.000042156644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24044101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3732952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24044101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018677052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03331442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.478083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513469022","doi":"10.29173/alr245","title":"&lt;i&gt;Rediscovering the Law of Negligence&lt;/i&gt;, Allan Beever","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.033783211853560986,"score_gpt":0.30123687760464624,"score_spread":0.26745366575108526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513469022","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015721318,0.4227478,0.0013391256,0.3000107,0.008858659,0.000058769725,0.0007966386,0.00017141312,0.26444477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07561096,0.13158362,0.00227146,0.22013995,0.006394415,0.00019111017,0.0004732215,0.00026084698,0.56307447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728405,0.00053117884,0.0001672999,0.00028935904,0.0012323416,0.0004958115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971782,0.0015453354,0.00022151481,0.0001198066,0.0007304707,0.0002046939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030403403,0.0007511818,0.000489074,0.0017914685,0.005415404,0.0052958955,0.0018128857,0.016602758,0.016341722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008218131,0.00089269126,0.00058735005,0.001858624,0.006252194,0.0051461277,0.0015228095,0.0097871665,0.0046988092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010353672,0.0000073401875,0.0001466557,0.000090270565,0.000003608426,0.000060426573,0.00033404617,0.000055921326,0.000048079557,0.08099511,0.9064152,0.011833071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016454773,0.000012945886,0.0028164363,0.0006839481,0.000014900055,0.0001061877,0.00075802306,0.00011754051,0.00025682076,0.04407767,0.95110834,0.00003071613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36232314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6077183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36232314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012026507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014588494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72042835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516333285","doi":"10.5539/mas.v10n12p132","title":"Rationales and Applications of Mutuality of Obligations in Iranian Contract Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Lien; Economics","score_opus":0.02473129428048942,"score_gpt":0.31306739456853455,"score_spread":0.2883361002880451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516333285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04439787,0.014710509,0.3049668,0.042117108,0.0009821841,0.00057287613,0.00022331989,0.0001380047,0.59189135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93453723,0.0033999193,0.049812596,0.0027395538,0.0006787059,0.0004928329,0.00005859678,0.000024247618,0.008256247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972553,0.0048641334,0.000648596,0.0011933921,0.003012513,0.00055583596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933054,0.0040252614,0.000923402,0.0005453127,0.0009729246,0.00022781086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013930477,0.0004874922,0.00053971884,0.0033908435,0.0043940153,0.0054138354,0.0018796059,0.0049062367,0.0030724416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012694773,0.00052643946,0.00092896883,0.002213971,0.03253894,0.008753813,0.0030778751,0.0058128648,0.00043606746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.967615e-7,0.0000016269661,0.00003411455,0.000008183087,9.366852e-7,0.000019966206,0.00020808897,0.000057780577,0.000011911945,0.99891436,0.00011191341,0.00063031854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008809824,0.0000072919784,0.00019876407,0.00007736607,0.0000042995316,0.00008633864,0.00026164768,0.0009211603,0.00007619242,0.98530024,0.013047281,0.000010527682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035008842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002709018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013930477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063639204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048171855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073672354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251677888","doi":"","title":"Righting Past Wrongs Through Contextualization: Assessing Claims of Aboriginal Survivors of Historical and Institutional Abuses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Plaintiff; Tort; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Criminology; Liability","score_opus":0.019457208659973534,"score_gpt":0.33835523458238626,"score_spread":0.31889802592241273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251677888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955448,0.00021846086,0.00024811155,0.0003675201,0.000006846967,0.00006863164,0.000022549519,0.0000016941018,0.0035212834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984162,0.0003694062,0.0005960453,0.00005588553,0.000008053539,0.00005382846,0.000031249874,0.0000015779008,0.00046769652],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698454,0.0014471671,0.00032195082,0.00016736935,0.00064371835,0.00043521076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99146855,0.0031949384,0.0026553688,0.00050910824,0.0016201693,0.0005517666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006452332,0.00040510506,0.00035663985,0.003117574,0.006596024,0.0042282837,0.0011258101,0.0015685159,0.002078897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016814418,0.00036242642,0.0005600597,0.0017408378,0.0058669234,0.0026247993,0.007490266,0.0017595642,0.00022786095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010109613,0.00018655421,0.22284825,0.0003034963,0.00007278453,0.001485009,0.7457392,0.00032279786,0.0011146786,0.003605261,0.00035492616,0.023865871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021465366,0.0001483056,0.19127533,0.00026203156,0.000060393206,0.0005049471,0.80235255,0.00028211065,0.00038807056,0.0018435635,0.0028490606,0.000031403168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025629021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06051353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025629021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034727084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040924596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050959647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519043242","doi":"","title":"The Entrenchment of Discretion: Prospects for Judicial Appointment Reform after a Trio of References","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Discretion; Law; Political science; Principal (computer security); Milestone; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.011153762293667753,"score_gpt":0.2885464288425313,"score_spread":0.2773926665488635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519043242","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08218879,0.022466287,0.021540178,0.5096691,0.0041642827,0.00029146596,0.00025525724,0.00025775394,0.35916698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85890263,0.005604397,0.010215972,0.046110265,0.003715352,0.00013979587,0.00013584142,0.00010722876,0.07506847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771712,0.0060784724,0.00068183156,0.0023047396,0.006287551,0.007476228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608267,0.019522997,0.0020605437,0.0047121784,0.008140439,0.0047370885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028206404,0.00025924278,0.0007553228,0.002118893,0.011616345,0.012376263,0.004357603,0.011251704,0.009524919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06568111,0.00043123175,0.001032899,0.0032654312,0.017398385,0.0075085587,0.0038157823,0.009758868,0.0013117522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030830575,0.000024349367,0.00033485715,0.000035594978,0.0000035884232,0.000088196524,0.001905095,0.00029201564,0.00011845999,0.96263784,0.01168544,0.022843732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014856934,0.00012019538,0.0052042175,0.0007276636,0.00003557804,0.00011166662,0.0056309444,0.0022582773,0.000735655,0.42020115,0.56469464,0.00013154933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37787944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4704664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37787944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03713993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07058176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7513599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519302653","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2016.1223952","title":"The extent and intensity of insider trading enforcement – an international comparison","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Melbourne","keywords":"Sanctions; Insider trading; Enforcement; Statutory law; Business; Empirical research; Scope (computer science); Insider; Accounting; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.18649086852595417,"score_gpt":0.4004358778108935,"score_spread":0.21394500928493934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519302653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805967,0.0007477004,0.00036784384,0.00013708456,0.000011647909,0.000018382547,0.0011803816,0.000012134176,0.016928049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972843,0.00035909232,0.00018563188,0.000027373653,0.000013964264,0.000006023904,0.0013257964,0.00000826755,0.000789631],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696773,0.00065174955,0.00040899802,0.00054632826,0.00095703633,0.0004681406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769419,0.0040773605,0.013854389,0.0012885716,0.0030476747,0.0007901166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021370722,0.00017419204,0.000448397,0.004619147,0.000646017,0.001977363,0.00043468646,0.00036555866,0.0021762704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00883862,0.0001428516,0.0003551619,0.0060931453,0.0013968612,0.0017475021,0.0014587778,0.00062505616,0.00024282293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016531766,0.00007992052,0.95926416,0.00012504766,0.0002478337,0.00034241437,0.004309646,0.0011814681,0.0008924971,0.004178562,0.0013332618,0.027879797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002253698,0.00003644614,0.99411535,0.000034498124,0.000024801571,0.00016800358,0.0023637922,0.00022219235,0.00025558894,0.000121063735,0.0026442397,0.00001173724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021956338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039723117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021956338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010733788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062684866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043657064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520832235","doi":"10.29173/alr151","title":"The Road to the Promised Land Runs Past &lt;i&gt;Conway&lt;/i&gt;: Administrative Tribunals and &lt;i&gt;Charter&lt;/i&gt; Remedies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Tribunal; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Mandate; Statutory law; State (computer science); Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.04993976833985774,"score_gpt":0.3124187147228283,"score_spread":0.26247894638297053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520832235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031714823,0.009455587,0.0075824675,0.10571763,0.0011523546,0.00014651203,0.00045006603,0.00026592467,0.84351474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58581054,0.0038573055,0.0046140812,0.020063812,0.00031996047,0.00007600967,0.00018763139,0.00009746515,0.38497326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942812,0.00070858595,0.00013700091,0.0005952025,0.0024753294,0.0018026618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997891,0.000526411,0.00011991763,0.00019831883,0.0009839281,0.00028041442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003134426,0.0003034741,0.0004261457,0.0013844386,0.0148304915,0.010484851,0.0028565668,0.007499475,0.016340174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006336222,0.00046617456,0.0006413822,0.0013080381,0.011815025,0.0028801523,0.0025666053,0.0077007534,0.0023032199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018434575,0.00002341675,0.0013499339,0.000057293426,0.0000104960245,0.00040185486,0.0014350895,0.00047488476,0.00044525356,0.9182056,0.058879144,0.018698646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035753248,0.000059747086,0.007408193,0.00031897597,0.000045388948,0.00027468958,0.003903134,0.0011334734,0.0015632001,0.10696687,0.8781794,0.00011124785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70520353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8694076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29479647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028477758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05875174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59306514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521174906","doi":"10.1515/ajle-2016-0015","title":"Assessing Personal Injury Liabilities in China from National to Provincial Level: An International Comparative Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Personal injury; Damages; Convergence (economics); Mainland China; Civil law (Civil law); China; Compensation (psychology); Law; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Delict; Economics; Law and economics; Liability; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Psychology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.06799291285301286,"score_gpt":0.3682331806633817,"score_spread":0.30024026781036883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521174906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974287,0.0002768894,0.00012730142,0.000053280364,0.000003157201,0.000011940781,0.00018338818,0.0000022547065,0.0019130529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993274,0.00011932161,0.00011149545,0.000007246845,0.000001835371,0.000005027566,0.00019265841,5.3404955e-7,0.00023461996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989312,0.00027194293,0.00009546823,0.00012993303,0.00029643113,0.00027493289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733907,0.0005729251,0.00061599363,0.00018124624,0.0010353196,0.0002554154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016416595,0.00021865698,0.00044146518,0.0066759665,0.0015695451,0.001093793,0.0005445788,0.00028761564,0.0025160562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003187999,0.00015722713,0.0007328098,0.01118092,0.00090360345,0.00057458814,0.001141359,0.00040939203,0.00011347715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095018004,0.000097294025,0.9750285,0.00016993495,0.00032127503,0.0005682289,0.0034297947,0.001571499,0.0004109235,0.002836929,0.00039429136,0.0150762815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036422468,0.000060825932,0.99373066,0.00003913063,0.00011764737,0.00009269356,0.0037560964,0.0010399249,0.00012613359,0.00014418032,0.00087906705,0.0000099395365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3956041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5052975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3956041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006922095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037425926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78660285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522008228","doi":"","title":"The Vulnerability Jurisdiction: Equity, Parens Patriae, and the Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Safeguarding; Law; Equity (law); Intervention (counseling); Jurisprudence; Autonomy; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction; Business; Law and economics; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.017336754512655914,"score_gpt":0.3134938404523928,"score_spread":0.2961570859397369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522008228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16052741,0.006335138,0.06468882,0.042266596,0.00025735702,0.00008540849,0.00009166586,0.00004696345,0.7257006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99199146,0.00038603653,0.0018545531,0.00085196143,0.000067497065,0.000023578445,0.000006632403,0.0000071886884,0.0048110695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642295,0.0012552511,0.000091381975,0.00047356737,0.00091330614,0.00084359496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978815,0.0012862983,0.00018137714,0.0001950495,0.0002642563,0.00019156771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036733714,0.0002498926,0.00034172286,0.0009172667,0.0049810526,0.006316247,0.0009639274,0.0026665067,0.0025532576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004852036,0.00026220482,0.00038911722,0.0008916967,0.06386122,0.006891152,0.005393375,0.0043516695,0.00012791192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010347705,7.1263827e-7,0.00007936646,0.0000025566935,4.7921986e-7,0.00002519944,0.0014214758,0.000032198626,0.000025775831,0.9977112,0.000096243566,0.0006036546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012958702,0.000013440856,0.0012434982,0.000080398866,0.000009765375,0.00020501006,0.0028215714,0.0004418795,0.00025432798,0.95244586,0.042454317,0.00001697352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078332126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06121743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078332126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011290032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009888139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15575236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522855291","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4721","title":"Defining Marriage: Classification, Interpretation, and Definitional Disputes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Epistemology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.028401602770812277,"score_gpt":0.3046576216162169,"score_spread":0.2762560188454046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522855291","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18297634,0.0096335085,0.38441378,0.06674272,0.00075388036,0.0003364293,0.0002520376,0.00015386009,0.35473752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738738,0.00087799213,0.020342344,0.001047568,0.00015974151,0.00015195255,0.00007240721,0.000039798888,0.00343429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.961099,0.029736856,0.0018342823,0.0016768472,0.0040489347,0.0016039333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98267937,0.012027333,0.0016128452,0.0016599753,0.0014629908,0.0005574687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030342018,0.00063970796,0.0010264898,0.00653554,0.008708898,0.01853986,0.0028633769,0.0057853456,0.002931751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03262109,0.0005765985,0.0008568562,0.0058901724,0.08880794,0.022663523,0.013037046,0.006904852,0.00028921076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035974074,0.0000033321733,0.00010649403,0.000011343601,0.0000013329296,0.000022807066,0.0077510457,0.00006726988,0.000026217449,0.990507,0.000172986,0.0013265933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068706845,0.0000050746744,0.00021679486,0.00008085209,0.000003167139,0.00006534633,0.009039191,0.0006197647,0.00012593684,0.9796784,0.010146088,0.000012530723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074554337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051555987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030342018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011530302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005156738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16046584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523429878","doi":"","title":"A Property Law Reader: Cases, Questions and Commentary, 4th Edition, Preface and Table of Contents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Principal (computer security); Property law; Element (criminal law); Law; Choice of law; Common law; Real property; Law and economics; Political science; Property rights; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.02899428516703129,"score_gpt":0.28462503769094116,"score_spread":0.2556307525239099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523429878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016460541,0.056913458,0.002391579,0.2047477,0.06307775,0.00027760002,0.0010691836,0.00037795753,0.66949874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020987902,0.027214073,0.0018232857,0.10500258,0.029370338,0.0006475067,0.0010347483,0.00043282658,0.8134868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987692,0.0004216327,0.000093060626,0.000113551476,0.00048255856,0.000119856166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568355,0.003077848,0.00016134324,0.00016952884,0.0007594021,0.00014839035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024372414,0.0006406393,0.0004242332,0.0026670205,0.0052043665,0.005387674,0.0020028872,0.0054999706,0.05694784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012390655,0.00042489916,0.0003841304,0.0036038049,0.004043084,0.0077672405,0.0025757405,0.0053432,0.020658247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038021424,0.000008276086,0.000026251902,0.00006109394,3.3602706e-7,0.000053980548,0.0006175952,0.000023047804,0.000040589966,0.02158047,0.97166026,0.0059242514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019192519,0.000003545084,0.00016013392,0.00030402368,5.805521e-7,0.000049197573,0.0007216415,0.0000358967,0.00003118593,0.0038815849,0.99480563,0.0000047563226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01925662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027161779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05694784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065240473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048562954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1905095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524712710","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3059","title":"Book Note: Natural Law In Court: A History Of Legal Theory In Practice, by R. H. Helmolz","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Political science; Legal history; Economic Justice; Comparative law; Common law; Natural law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.010575523960575742,"score_gpt":0.28958181223260543,"score_spread":0.27900628827202967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524712710","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014655084,0.394997,0.006177212,0.28534594,0.011264613,0.000050182625,0.00026942062,0.00007561636,0.30035454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1408895,0.42521882,0.008987641,0.097344965,0.034740586,0.00024896956,0.0004732734,0.00036511914,0.2917311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836856,0.00068085437,0.00006143464,0.00021707025,0.000571851,0.0001002794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969131,0.0024533167,0.000106006315,0.00014263132,0.00027225312,0.00011271537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017818732,0.00068178,0.0004929319,0.0025944025,0.003531502,0.005209882,0.0009564862,0.003572087,0.007942817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005375839,0.0004371766,0.00030252282,0.003334255,0.017800737,0.00914119,0.0022780003,0.005529039,0.0022437742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001007547,0.000019952646,0.00012833171,0.00010373181,0.000004374179,0.00004121573,0.0012543779,0.00023696106,0.0000538268,0.5898828,0.3780021,0.0302623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006114091,0.00000797116,0.00027689827,0.00039193785,0.0000020612804,0.00006055312,0.00044940202,0.00013311837,0.000046771926,0.18839617,0.8102209,0.000008141862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013055453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021002335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013055453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067885495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005679298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049254596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525171706","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n8p6","title":"The Principle of Continuance in Public Service Contract","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuance; Business; Public service; Service (business); Realization (probability); Executive branch; Contract management; Public interest; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Political science; Economics; Politics; Marketing","score_opus":0.029594645925991505,"score_gpt":0.32447525717530007,"score_spread":0.2948806112493086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525171706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028277377,0.0014151179,0.13124043,0.022212153,0.0005467603,0.0003674673,0.00026208762,0.00021726603,0.8154614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.881966,0.00080361555,0.03468965,0.0033082396,0.00063412753,0.0008214732,0.00014711273,0.00010865656,0.077521086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901219,0.0026385852,0.0005992951,0.0019406221,0.003354695,0.0013448745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958729,0.0012548156,0.00035050375,0.0008573207,0.0012347867,0.00042971675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00857085,0.00037323838,0.00051172473,0.0012291061,0.0055996845,0.0074245273,0.0014496435,0.0052875997,0.0059444015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009557621,0.0005088346,0.0010586956,0.0009942363,0.019272653,0.0070503,0.0042869723,0.0064771795,0.0015727174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031183847,0.000004037984,0.000053675325,0.0000064228307,0.000001360906,0.00002187417,0.00032784656,0.000058171627,0.00003375161,0.9977506,0.0006209274,0.0011181955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029065197,0.00003425828,0.00040822662,0.00008422253,0.000007845362,0.00024175226,0.00053887616,0.00075007544,0.0001986295,0.9060871,0.09159521,0.000024766501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065240045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003802292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00857085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050570397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007976878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045327544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525336485","doi":"10.29173/alr440","title":"Unique Public Duties of Care: Judicial Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Tort; Government (linguistics); Political science; Liability; Judicial activism; Supreme Court Decisions; Judicial review","score_opus":0.028799560372321075,"score_gpt":0.29728864992216664,"score_spread":0.26848908954984557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525336485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1369281,0.017608393,0.0034604876,0.2738653,0.0011233143,0.00013511298,0.00018584113,0.000054696466,0.5666387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.931896,0.0037915197,0.0010620318,0.038386103,0.00033356878,0.000040391264,0.000049567243,0.000026322303,0.024414554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834425,0.0030153892,0.00034335116,0.0016151833,0.005307128,0.006276441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98948866,0.00558137,0.0005958042,0.00039640354,0.0022180341,0.0017197029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011193094,0.00024149283,0.0005894141,0.0014646001,0.029977106,0.016361848,0.0029253422,0.012946922,0.0033842223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017026043,0.000615907,0.0005401359,0.0026995325,0.030975953,0.0035269025,0.006522765,0.016300796,0.00018897883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070192223,0.000015978896,0.0013211395,0.00003406872,0.000011740689,0.00045709944,0.0109640695,0.0002484221,0.00013083708,0.9592408,0.019909203,0.007659649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000724497,0.00004292273,0.02342847,0.0014028524,0.00015690902,0.000509688,0.033128966,0.0021921827,0.00090632157,0.24194604,0.69595313,0.00025997547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95349145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98171854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12220704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12220704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19886757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8866783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527612733","doi":"","title":"Trust Regulation in the Czech Republic: the Model Law for Introduction of the Trust Instrument in the Republic of Latvia?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; The Republic; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.26993939187476623,"score_gpt":0.529157775443563,"score_spread":0.2592183835687968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527612733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13634698,0.007989922,0.05423339,0.038928024,0.0007164165,0.0002835754,0.00040175905,0.00013838701,0.7609615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981928,0.0014327257,0.0024553663,0.0014752697,0.00008502229,0.000089676236,0.000060437957,0.000024948069,0.012448585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945779,0.001685013,0.0003233625,0.0009102385,0.0012951053,0.0012085232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968958,0.0010148233,0.0006488281,0.00038910218,0.00081277423,0.00023861133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039222925,0.00032041923,0.00041758796,0.0017204735,0.0037221964,0.013104937,0.0012765427,0.003677707,0.0053017414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008183036,0.00037097445,0.0009481077,0.0016722558,0.009075537,0.008722352,0.0031960418,0.00443062,0.0005894054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108026725,0.00001062151,0.0006352039,0.000036992933,0.0000060676093,0.00012819008,0.0006273391,0.00058620446,0.000076820914,0.99420303,0.0014118215,0.002266805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086855194,0.00011132567,0.011500981,0.0012333698,0.000097732925,0.0009224845,0.006464516,0.014651261,0.0007893491,0.8019858,0.1619449,0.00021149748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041028783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02653031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041028783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01418355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010713404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10290933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527975175","doi":"10.3138/9781442671669-015","title":"Mack v. Attorney General of Canada and the Structure of the Action in Unjust Enrichment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Physics; Restitution","score_opus":0.017544902709300262,"score_gpt":0.22439203942832353,"score_spread":0.20684713671902327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527975175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010005554,0.028507818,0.00090779114,0.11528825,0.0006721128,0.000066453424,0.0003378329,0.000054548276,0.84415966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3822339,0.008823967,0.0010054444,0.0393299,0.00025886254,0.00010873799,0.00011302953,0.000077065546,0.56804913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963148,0.00039527408,0.000057078487,0.00017818267,0.0011552966,0.0018993296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824905,0.0005288588,0.00008404855,0.00005971604,0.0007368038,0.00034151654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016384536,0.0005033464,0.00047509084,0.0015046843,0.023455568,0.008664252,0.0016565054,0.008900024,0.013417362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055738804,0.0006108004,0.00037438906,0.0024708302,0.013569303,0.002812859,0.0022057488,0.00864645,0.0009255859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015143786,0.0000069254534,0.00049328944,0.000033528722,0.0000035786795,0.00012234591,0.0037214211,0.00016051941,0.000055802793,0.8131984,0.17552306,0.00666607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022035892,0.000009903007,0.004693476,0.00049044203,0.000023444696,0.00010050417,0.007394628,0.0003193468,0.00023423947,0.09799582,0.8886482,0.00006810084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98318994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99473274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08771263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08771263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15684965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63640267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528019077","doi":"10.29173/alr444","title":"Tate &amp; Lyle : Pure Economic Loss and the Modern Tort of Public Nuisance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.037549258415729495,"score_gpt":0.31660776890328457,"score_spread":0.2790585104875551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528019077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02735455,0.09109815,0.010905374,0.30198503,0.001199292,0.0000989825,0.0002682586,0.00008866145,0.5670017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7219861,0.029502228,0.0029013627,0.06829778,0.0010279508,0.00008729285,0.000089374356,0.00005415207,0.17605361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938851,0.0009826922,0.00009837364,0.00051493937,0.00274761,0.0017713801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978574,0.0009358918,0.00019993195,0.0001594915,0.0006824532,0.00016485337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029740795,0.0004743756,0.00042211838,0.0018875505,0.009226206,0.008853869,0.0020016008,0.008858024,0.0045073293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006677934,0.00033107688,0.00065605796,0.0017998241,0.03850071,0.0050217668,0.0026573364,0.0065908334,0.00043559403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065816685,0.000004907958,0.00022185642,0.000040015453,0.0000034663115,0.00010887727,0.001225543,0.00019432178,0.00004827549,0.97330767,0.019630013,0.0052085104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026920325,0.000025405168,0.0059017604,0.000480423,0.000028114842,0.0003627596,0.0033382685,0.00094531465,0.00037403504,0.33369365,0.6546974,0.00012589149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86706084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8978306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13293916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058770698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045986015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4264133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528361617","doi":"10.29173/alr443","title":"The Rise and Fall of Plaintiff-Friendly Causation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.018618955193999528,"score_gpt":0.3121237151507845,"score_spread":0.293504759956785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528361617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067027844,0.03564872,0.03986762,0.45033568,0.0028674596,0.00022139316,0.0005191444,0.0002442434,0.4032679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8622751,0.011463941,0.0069411336,0.09728605,0.00148128,0.000111020585,0.0001334303,0.00011202437,0.02019591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9336407,0.015995514,0.0018468532,0.008382207,0.033743173,0.0063914713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9230344,0.044780638,0.006988797,0.0041708895,0.017296394,0.0037288605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053878903,0.0004918834,0.001078749,0.00467214,0.012212423,0.010089758,0.0028569319,0.009770456,0.006349373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10845456,0.00097060093,0.0011407558,0.0034694276,0.037682604,0.0070607457,0.0064816177,0.016088398,0.00061550416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005902068,0.0000057371935,0.0012767204,0.00003500071,0.000012990329,0.00010313843,0.0013425874,0.00007918199,0.00008104853,0.9814921,0.0063033737,0.009262179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065325214,0.00006549539,0.01573417,0.0007850402,0.00006837542,0.0006141926,0.0025963339,0.00084532646,0.0007999391,0.5967156,0.3815787,0.0001314639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39597502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45483977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39597502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04099537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047187872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7873404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528660797","doi":"","title":"Economic Efficiency, Normative Account-Giving and Corporate Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Corporate law; Corporate governance; Legitimacy; Realm; Shareholder; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Economics; Business; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.028770493364782816,"score_gpt":0.2901020338080352,"score_spread":0.26133154044325235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528660797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028801268,0.01844476,0.042111676,0.084490225,0.0005591681,0.000048780086,0.0000746906,0.00010148645,0.825368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95912457,0.005328858,0.0059647285,0.0063937204,0.00068159826,0.00015475931,0.000048226237,0.000064373286,0.022239268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925223,0.004125163,0.00021198412,0.0005818408,0.0017342619,0.0008243491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925243,0.005183988,0.00065162656,0.0007140043,0.0006938331,0.00023226284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009252719,0.00054729223,0.00070687395,0.0018350187,0.003473347,0.010656537,0.0012335723,0.004541781,0.0026398317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017468827,0.000347698,0.000429061,0.001972456,0.0390454,0.009236803,0.0035279936,0.005360626,0.00048334154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.399756e-7,0.0000025900154,0.000041601248,0.0000033033546,0.0000010087969,0.000004531586,0.000105697414,0.000114938804,0.000005475548,0.9983506,0.00061998895,0.0007493197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023744794,0.0000013605248,0.00007704977,0.000015802041,0.0000010907559,0.000007110376,0.00009387035,0.00020528566,0.000023334334,0.9928947,0.006675515,0.0000026603511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038447257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030697128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010656537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007060241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044841934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0512259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528824097","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1001","title":"A Closer Look at Seemingly Pro-Tenant Provisions in the Residential Tenancies Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Landlord; Notice; Renting; Legislature; Leasehold estate; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.030168176311533252,"score_gpt":0.35825166795438385,"score_spread":0.3280834916428506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528824097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41009682,0.0014025841,0.005980773,0.042152088,0.0003310359,0.00021287246,0.0005978018,0.0000719622,0.53915405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8805025,0.00069784815,0.0018017673,0.006400991,0.000094070885,0.00008213127,0.00010209467,0.00003060726,0.11028802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965802,0.00054659316,0.00011238593,0.00019169321,0.0013130327,0.0012561906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674594,0.0017703683,0.00030686063,0.00015622261,0.0007859649,0.00023457226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021395802,0.00015745577,0.00022721748,0.0007091337,0.008371284,0.0044306554,0.0010955991,0.004009665,0.0034133338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005749399,0.0002852113,0.00046691237,0.0016881806,0.008882154,0.0015861968,0.0011499494,0.0034507741,0.00029587417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040009072,0.000051678504,0.009094957,0.00005475929,0.000008916696,0.00055656146,0.037548523,0.00090552925,0.001299263,0.93001366,0.01181173,0.008614501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006311309,0.00018134262,0.136626,0.00026042608,0.00009143071,0.00038049763,0.08683805,0.0033907385,0.0023035405,0.06719323,0.7024679,0.00020370667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92241764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92241764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044531904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027248545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32310307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529438815","doi":"10.29173/alr446","title":"Multi-Party Disputes: Equities Between Concurrent Tortfeasors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Plaintiff; Joint and several liability; Liability; Statute; Legislation; Law and economics; Injustice; Business; Indemnity; Law; Tort; Political science; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.08473565239656712,"score_gpt":0.3829410442121179,"score_spread":0.2982053918155508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529438815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14345413,0.00808604,0.1599523,0.038257126,0.0005680432,0.0004900249,0.00013259213,0.000058203303,0.64900154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448551,0.0016293922,0.015730703,0.0023348825,0.0005686291,0.0003094611,0.000048784874,0.000036604866,0.03448654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618544,0.019018432,0.0020313296,0.004522082,0.008393091,0.004180673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9490265,0.037377425,0.0033791175,0.0044685844,0.003900435,0.0018478408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047364365,0.00054353237,0.0014806977,0.002470003,0.012805242,0.014375719,0.005430102,0.013996208,0.018560931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073153384,0.00090536155,0.002129582,0.0028792173,0.021065263,0.029710937,0.013945786,0.01103229,0.0013398681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010687631,0.000016557544,0.00038312812,0.0000150048145,0.000008321195,0.00018997527,0.0012171961,0.00044091133,0.000034935983,0.9933202,0.00066213944,0.0037009357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002691646,0.000018435656,0.0004787725,0.000120500816,0.000019672305,0.0002648606,0.0011313485,0.0022956436,0.00009136312,0.9814369,0.0140974345,0.000018131603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008234824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047364365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01075964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008635083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2504897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529581439","doi":"","title":"The Death of Contract, Redux: Boilerplate and the End of Interpretation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Severability; Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Exclusion clause; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Contract management; Economics; Privity of contract","score_opus":0.007110858453336038,"score_gpt":0.27768944506388427,"score_spread":0.27057858661054823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529581439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046267528,0.011285953,0.08864255,0.122103676,0.0008702225,0.0000664316,0.00010644367,0.00010462746,0.7305527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94560516,0.0024215463,0.0075110532,0.009193464,0.00033297646,0.00008626803,0.00004632826,0.00013112233,0.034672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98479176,0.007468244,0.00029257237,0.0012043976,0.0045981896,0.0016448285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99296653,0.0041797017,0.0003695154,0.0011359336,0.0010474067,0.00030077292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014286371,0.00045558202,0.000637058,0.0013303567,0.014085854,0.015750004,0.0022273243,0.0071868743,0.0035697408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015343309,0.00046757222,0.00058131467,0.0017983365,0.0982502,0.01317694,0.0069210627,0.0123950215,0.00056072016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024864955,7.872366e-7,0.000029188684,0.0000033137326,4.6853722e-7,0.000018226781,0.0024749355,0.000027465665,0.000010126088,0.9956476,0.0007418025,0.0010435232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076890055,0.0000060147495,0.00017469733,0.0000976884,0.000003643985,0.00007436733,0.0040320316,0.0003773194,0.000120072174,0.9202595,0.07483498,0.000011941264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1151363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1151363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022108588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020799454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22893226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529629861","doi":"10.29173/alr437","title":"Do We Really Need the Anns Test for Duty of Care in Negligence?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Duty; Test (biology); Duty of care; Law; Value (mathematics); Business; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.029973322022533288,"score_gpt":0.34390976101524434,"score_spread":0.31393643899271106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529629861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015566048,0.027269438,0.02696125,0.749654,0.007450646,0.00015025891,0.00050187815,0.00006993015,0.17237647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5250901,0.020366142,0.032222793,0.38452366,0.009322118,0.00038123826,0.00058363035,0.000104215,0.027406206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720667,0.0069003436,0.0019225555,0.002262051,0.0142106805,0.002637674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471045,0.038032528,0.002386278,0.0017517874,0.009363159,0.0013615678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028366353,0.00054090435,0.0019631325,0.0033716836,0.004109791,0.0041212393,0.0039071403,0.012549481,0.007668457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10282613,0.0005595488,0.0015294884,0.002383502,0.029581353,0.014410894,0.0031237658,0.012230992,0.0017507044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003617185,0.000038649465,0.0030705708,0.00023465135,0.00003951156,0.00023783727,0.0007756569,0.00025510203,0.00017026113,0.9067347,0.042768393,0.045638494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006845037,0.00012774293,0.006081553,0.0012329635,0.000044776258,0.00058494485,0.0012546625,0.00093825354,0.00027551924,0.81114846,0.17813532,0.00010736964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09537178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15606576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09537178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011598548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028396225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18963331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529691861","doi":"","title":"Resolving Dilemmas in Canadian Class Actions by Reconsidering Private Law Principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pfizer Canada; BC Cancer Agency; Royal Bank of Canada; Pfizer","keywords":"Plaintiff; Wrongdoing; Class action; Law; Private law; Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Political science; Restitution; Common law; Economics; Public law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.188680171936929,"score_gpt":0.3436088980693538,"score_spread":0.1549287261324248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529691861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09179406,0.0014318433,0.020665025,0.12389971,0.000685484,0.00020800183,0.00008391011,0.0000956245,0.76113635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965759,0.0006775478,0.009413007,0.014029615,0.00026357305,0.00009323588,0.0000495506,0.00006252998,0.07883505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862896,0.0028050707,0.0005048198,0.0016770879,0.004639871,0.0040835263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993572,0.0030997463,0.00041099387,0.0006165032,0.0013447789,0.0009560054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012550775,0.00041143468,0.00058016414,0.0021356957,0.024115466,0.016628923,0.003577208,0.01267287,0.009457033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022398833,0.0005748985,0.0009936568,0.001403177,0.027166698,0.008986715,0.008406913,0.0117884595,0.00071327103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068261056,0.000016857082,0.00046073558,0.000011434607,0.0000044015987,0.00020271419,0.0047175544,0.00043164336,0.00009886079,0.98107564,0.004915274,0.008058048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055767545,0.000033444307,0.002323855,0.0001940977,0.000044906483,0.0002860073,0.01092086,0.0044423705,0.0006229337,0.69928175,0.2816941,0.000099941695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7135015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78995246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2864985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06445761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08510443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57637143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529753270","doi":"10.7202/1037966ar","title":"Can Better Law Be Married with Corrective Justice or Evil Laws?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04167411055314016,"score_gpt":0.3097435729707871,"score_spread":0.26806946241764695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529753270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032453153,0.01903558,0.06880933,0.38599917,0.0037316661,0.000079857586,0.000116230454,0.0001427373,0.4896322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90868783,0.005714768,0.009629674,0.04474279,0.0026386,0.00015635998,0.00006236927,0.00017918128,0.02818841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98479915,0.006215096,0.0004771118,0.0024021163,0.0038014303,0.002305109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98378825,0.009636244,0.0021188194,0.002162071,0.0012664258,0.0010280815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015733492,0.0006196839,0.0014555876,0.0028059017,0.008214373,0.015565407,0.0027022029,0.009304771,0.011922023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03491047,0.0005312881,0.0010619977,0.0020855216,0.085315555,0.035422336,0.009639154,0.012572879,0.0013391051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025386666,0.0000043402583,0.00006890241,0.000011139879,0.0000015300652,0.000007687692,0.00043618467,0.000026455584,0.000007819838,0.99722254,0.0007160017,0.0014947163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005004488,0.0000072344815,0.00010844889,0.00006458098,0.0000024942854,0.000024036162,0.00076228235,0.00009764111,0.000035462897,0.9732337,0.025650283,0.000008946924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075413147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065053203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015733492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072132493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075642643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08320767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530124281","doi":"10.5539/ass.v12n11p86","title":"A Comparative Study of Concept and Bases of Frustration of Purpose Doctrine in Iranian and English Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Frustration of purpose; Frustration; Doctrine; Obligation; Law; Deliberation; Denial; Political science; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Exclusion clause; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Contract management; Epistemology; Philosophy; Privity of contract","score_opus":0.03730229654324608,"score_gpt":0.3511702762835778,"score_spread":0.3138679797403317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530124281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.818796,0.0048067165,0.0029076254,0.0049797646,0.00011846043,0.00006779658,0.00003865247,0.00001660033,0.16826831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983286,0.0005306036,0.00027677155,0.0001252814,0.00002214904,0.000011587512,0.000011335183,0.0000036809463,0.0006900633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960963,0.0020768268,0.00014368098,0.00022376732,0.0010297392,0.0004296711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220145,0.005130469,0.001095343,0.00018172506,0.0010286632,0.00036230256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00473175,0.0001772741,0.0002649912,0.004937374,0.004105055,0.0052867522,0.0008247104,0.0008950189,0.0027474014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01177887,0.00016284242,0.00021598236,0.0044777975,0.015106843,0.007016954,0.0018926574,0.0016991874,0.0001352969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043036547,0.00011795652,0.019196203,0.00014688735,0.000010986785,0.00083340256,0.40907264,0.00010185754,0.00041833898,0.5369242,0.001667449,0.031467076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016627413,0.0001044551,0.09735649,0.0005501553,0.00002648896,0.0009208216,0.7714587,0.0011447478,0.0003417054,0.053705312,0.074325845,0.000048668368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01102856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013003167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01102856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008152384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036728142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05914992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531490401","doi":"","title":"Flaws and Improvement of the Legal System for Forfeiture of Inheritance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Genetics","score_opus":0.018110943505346005,"score_gpt":0.32550558498177345,"score_spread":0.3073946414764275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531490401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16418938,0.013591381,0.12773836,0.19942954,0.00561283,0.0012106433,0.0009626993,0.0014268531,0.48583826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84765375,0.0041105878,0.07143923,0.022065718,0.0013816374,0.00044400358,0.000398067,0.00024194864,0.052265026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9630435,0.008148805,0.0041168644,0.004683733,0.017182946,0.002824142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601621,0.012081055,0.0024421294,0.009973018,0.014180823,0.0011609233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037789404,0.00042922507,0.000653246,0.004181968,0.005069352,0.008085717,0.0047767772,0.007140534,0.0040756445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058990408,0.0006712445,0.0013249859,0.0021496285,0.013566866,0.008227378,0.0037236558,0.009768264,0.0010624775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018598545,0.00005143639,0.0017746637,0.0000829567,0.000013915739,0.00015056586,0.0014640564,0.00036179202,0.00047033952,0.96685266,0.009711358,0.019047763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001793656,0.00019203484,0.014344029,0.0012759444,0.00027347016,0.0010199619,0.002161132,0.0099000465,0.005176086,0.5663752,0.3987337,0.00036903864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037356995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021003233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037789404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009412402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026986491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19985187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531701421","doi":"10.29173/alr445","title":"Contribution Between Negligent Tortfeasors and Unjust Enrichment: An Outline of a Solution to the \"No Benefit to B\" Issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Joint and several liability; Payment; Economics; Law; Tort; Business; Political science; Finance; History","score_opus":0.025435365638782112,"score_gpt":0.3377882352698575,"score_spread":0.3123528696310754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531701421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019293625,0.037145704,0.20213765,0.21119572,0.002536549,0.00076333166,0.00013433804,0.00015947392,0.5266336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65958244,0.034242544,0.15563336,0.055096176,0.0054798336,0.0012641018,0.00011357326,0.00015561482,0.088432334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99117273,0.0041316366,0.0005028942,0.0010614219,0.0021620758,0.00096927263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941256,0.0039784573,0.00040982282,0.00040028803,0.0008155284,0.00027025706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012838106,0.0007347773,0.0012220208,0.003378823,0.0047182976,0.009969041,0.0027798223,0.017527021,0.0054130736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009402085,0.00092622556,0.0020372197,0.0022112255,0.024142578,0.010226806,0.00569149,0.012676862,0.00086354074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023655525,0.000011171081,0.00006171561,0.000029957979,0.0000036024442,0.00006555442,0.0001697957,0.00017048272,0.000035989575,0.99506974,0.0014838524,0.002895696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000176704,0.000021930075,0.00029570563,0.00024356855,0.000021785245,0.00013300053,0.00039170068,0.00092276343,0.000120295954,0.95353913,0.04427338,0.0000190784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012361101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016084768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017527021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00714491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019100986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06789523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533596360","doi":"","title":"Applying the ex turpi causa principle in tort actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Tort; Damages; Law; Plaintiff; Wrongdoing; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.04065055375142693,"score_gpt":0.30398182145493546,"score_spread":0.26333126770350856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533596360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024034016,0.003954864,0.22444443,0.060053848,0.0014099269,0.00037557073,0.00014514948,0.00019022835,0.68539196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88593936,0.0024709688,0.06571293,0.011110223,0.0016251375,0.0007594975,0.00006593518,0.00010803096,0.03220795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98498696,0.0072891074,0.0010507712,0.0017689869,0.0038079252,0.001096194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924583,0.004799956,0.0006899364,0.0010919669,0.0007980886,0.00016167917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017230362,0.0007473785,0.0013732119,0.0032814199,0.0058325324,0.006760607,0.0023945349,0.014023333,0.0048972517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018390846,0.0010139989,0.0018743023,0.0017933206,0.050485183,0.009796223,0.007847579,0.012018477,0.0014939941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018283827,0.0000043611117,0.000060253893,0.00001130978,0.0000026218866,0.00005023797,0.00024538342,0.00012364722,0.000034073688,0.99758387,0.00045402112,0.0014283677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006047252,0.000010360878,0.00013632834,0.000050981882,0.000004512226,0.00011333759,0.0001793026,0.00041290463,0.00009543109,0.98865765,0.010324585,0.000008499679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029646775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032954689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017230362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036925143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00463906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09112394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537912059","doi":"10.1093/9780199677993.001.0001","title":"14. Privity of Contract","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Statutory law; Enforcement; Business; Law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Exclusion clause; Contract management; Economics","score_opus":0.055017003678380916,"score_gpt":0.3471691843430573,"score_spread":0.2921521806646764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537912059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010081811,0.0029108592,0.004395224,0.003771094,0.00042207047,0.000042771844,0.000065766915,0.00003779515,0.98734623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13511819,0.0076565486,0.005054004,0.0058494057,0.0009304645,0.0002517491,0.00022951087,0.00013886369,0.8447713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709535,0.00068802387,0.00013463717,0.00041426386,0.0013658903,0.00030185655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868196,0.00041607197,0.000101506484,0.00023758478,0.00047473586,0.00008808394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017060994,0.00035176927,0.00042439438,0.00084713905,0.003076911,0.007910056,0.0008635897,0.0029344342,0.022707548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036416969,0.00035001338,0.0005292025,0.0010742049,0.008905443,0.0042144572,0.0025066433,0.004081608,0.005814679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016829703,0.0000033651784,0.000022366768,0.000016241522,6.301979e-7,0.000015917587,0.00028262724,0.00008015511,0.000022003778,0.98597187,0.009456801,0.0041263346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048696966,0.000013533502,0.00019387132,0.00023218279,0.000003437459,0.000093200644,0.00028222427,0.00029709208,0.00013005396,0.27605122,0.72268957,0.00000881198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010907877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007232596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022707548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006329563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007529639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07596433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541481203","doi":"10.29173/alr449","title":"Rethinking Privacy: Exclusivity, Private Relation and Tort Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Plaintiff; Law; Dignity; Relation (database); Liability; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04068010468877922,"score_gpt":0.3254055435698499,"score_spread":0.2847254388810707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541481203","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024255399,0.4004017,0.008164106,0.31762698,0.0019461459,0.000044182547,0.00004283177,0.000030253805,0.24748833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7181014,0.16384624,0.0030793007,0.05387851,0.0040171864,0.000080225116,0.000045523393,0.00005116488,0.056900505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99063474,0.005928415,0.0002812911,0.0005561932,0.0019180771,0.0006813205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826415,0.014795602,0.00079844036,0.00041297817,0.001080161,0.00027138973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010929686,0.0003288961,0.0007325637,0.0025507498,0.004230519,0.011646549,0.0016664333,0.010995937,0.003075098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013198212,0.00041316013,0.00050631945,0.0035213032,0.037552178,0.010350236,0.003697846,0.007621242,0.00037827692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037183063,0.000007972872,0.00015243914,0.00007517123,0.0000033945605,0.00009522446,0.0026786122,0.00010671633,0.000047361365,0.9843687,0.0058089155,0.0066518486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012784933,0.000029248928,0.0016801534,0.0012592832,0.000024648467,0.00017700499,0.005202689,0.00030326608,0.00014320391,0.71688026,0.2742642,0.000023344557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060227793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09991806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060227793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01291793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012482709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11975443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542214041","doi":"","title":"Keeping the Promise of Public Fiduciary Theory: A Reply to Leib and Galoob","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Private law; Sociology; Public law; Duty","score_opus":0.09025192314591357,"score_gpt":0.356500903930992,"score_spread":0.2662489807850784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542214041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009871238,0.030910905,0.0013012328,0.94160336,0.0026736637,0.0000057810757,0.00004431551,0.000022253698,0.022451416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2043177,0.045221247,0.0027135387,0.6893071,0.025265481,0.00013627819,0.000088059925,0.00024894328,0.03270166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912736,0.004375383,0.00022305864,0.0012297429,0.002167512,0.0007307589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793753,0.017149027,0.000468435,0.0009372007,0.001439803,0.0006303205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016485894,0.0010914053,0.0020625885,0.0027385512,0.010558831,0.013320578,0.0044960487,0.041731507,0.007317054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026823077,0.00078731927,0.0012999536,0.0030747603,0.07141319,0.035508145,0.0075035538,0.036049362,0.002070272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008301401,0.00000968233,0.00003228816,0.000024061046,0.0000027824567,0.00003117103,0.00052695535,0.00006691698,0.000008541782,0.936857,0.06081953,0.0016127432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026840466,0.000005413607,0.000071017916,0.00019885316,0.000004099653,0.000036792066,0.00051192177,0.00017868448,0.000032899836,0.8757325,0.1231864,0.00001468621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014998333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01334552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041731507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016953127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009817875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12300414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542841893","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v5n1p168","title":"Modernising the Law of Gift","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Gift giving; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.21694481832167364,"score_gpt":0.5060792735081826,"score_spread":0.28913445518650893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542841893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033504594,0.028249413,0.06118104,0.24912974,0.0036582772,0.00008297287,0.00015641766,0.00024207804,0.6237955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8540412,0.013749967,0.017071636,0.030773856,0.005536034,0.00017798216,0.00008874331,0.0001825995,0.07837796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905866,0.004534608,0.0003747129,0.0013320576,0.0023243641,0.0008477125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98910224,0.006408373,0.0008193179,0.0018578512,0.001304565,0.0005075361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013945131,0.0005113605,0.0009127033,0.0025075627,0.0042602774,0.009264686,0.001722741,0.009004433,0.008796142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03112527,0.00044883,0.0007804255,0.0018272793,0.051362958,0.015793156,0.0067582186,0.012405989,0.0011115586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023575008,0.0000055061455,0.000046718753,0.000010966309,0.0000011883054,0.00000744872,0.00028562374,0.000075386335,0.000020095114,0.9958983,0.0011725414,0.0024738275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005618454,0.00000890826,0.00014195006,0.00007159138,0.0000031406018,0.000018698716,0.00016634195,0.000178498,0.0000834366,0.9589548,0.040359303,0.000007581576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057899742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004331356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013945131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008569404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008532475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07374978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545063720","doi":"","title":"Developments in Canadian Adult Guardianship and Co-Decision-Making Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Autonomy; Political science; Legislation; Guardian; Paternalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.031002948268392703,"score_gpt":0.37726675423942974,"score_spread":0.346263805971037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2545063720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08300807,0.031669665,0.008366282,0.122994654,0.0015888363,0.0002535053,0.0014893466,0.00026575924,0.75036377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7403721,0.020302529,0.0120540215,0.029864123,0.00051291136,0.0001169537,0.0006986129,0.000117590964,0.19596107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194896,0.00066673756,0.00027730837,0.0010193358,0.0040585357,0.0020291246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881048,0.0017596392,0.00045173347,0.0003497087,0.0071259956,0.0022080673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048903385,0.0004819099,0.00033632232,0.0024758088,0.013045682,0.0064746942,0.0027871947,0.003071704,0.011856344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009443963,0.0003609319,0.00062828505,0.0034256328,0.011007361,0.0017453524,0.0027768407,0.0037178316,0.0005051435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029387938,0.00003064039,0.00680732,0.00016131322,0.00001387902,0.0005356303,0.014043097,0.00060843857,0.0002604232,0.85970986,0.06452178,0.053278267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012580073,0.00001629023,0.014444813,0.00033793485,0.000024034405,0.00019843936,0.003285336,0.00071129604,0.00020243699,0.014361561,0.9663272,0.00007816992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77801204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22198798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27729565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9023837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W254730076","doi":"10.5840/envirophil2011819","title":"Law’s Environment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Applied philosophy; General interest; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05075763628237828,"score_gpt":0.24372725440722925,"score_spread":0.19296961812485097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W254730076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031349233,0.0047656214,0.00557956,0.10412378,0.0017581143,0.000026950282,0.000083042796,0.00006709496,0.8804609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40974832,0.0035359315,0.0030705254,0.062615156,0.0037453917,0.00015753326,0.00012454945,0.00016994902,0.5168326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685955,0.0012224083,0.0000950353,0.00057386275,0.0008342849,0.00041481495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865425,0.00047994082,0.00008275501,0.00024695837,0.00036911867,0.00016686023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031915572,0.00045363393,0.0006371824,0.0014359634,0.006153339,0.00894316,0.0010481926,0.0075901863,0.015374311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005147866,0.00037572987,0.0005217733,0.00083601306,0.022571826,0.0073525123,0.0039057266,0.01040364,0.0028121648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.750142e-7,0.0000059972285,0.000023008371,0.00000414267,0.0000015487278,0.00000824101,0.0002681076,0.000024176856,0.0000136983035,0.98717296,0.010753527,0.001723572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053989506,0.0000057570824,0.00010942724,0.000034401786,0.0000037628834,0.00002511441,0.0003057247,0.00007214243,0.00005591241,0.6992966,0.30007938,0.0000063979264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013897197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015926758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015374311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005017259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056620985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550873366","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000033","title":"LEGAL POWERS IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Private law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030963256392081466,"score_gpt":0.3228814066680886,"score_spread":0.29191815027600715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550873366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05873137,0.0037450239,0.079391986,0.038009208,0.00037396257,0.00006548883,0.00009446368,0.00008595832,0.81950253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844232,0.0008439925,0.0032880935,0.0011480629,0.00028289223,0.00005141082,0.00002197058,0.00002348736,0.009916909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384093,0.003310393,0.00021502099,0.0006366215,0.0014228137,0.0005742052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98872143,0.0075438707,0.00085953216,0.0012117237,0.001046065,0.00061735464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065537756,0.00033187005,0.00044771153,0.0023115627,0.004082077,0.008767785,0.00083548826,0.0031375878,0.006543684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012683721,0.0003577375,0.00048841734,0.0015664032,0.046418883,0.012595062,0.0052293576,0.004643221,0.00060321245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.5506314e-7,0.0000015510285,0.00002696798,0.000002473653,3.8632314e-7,0.0000056114914,0.00022209558,0.000050726143,0.0000074892237,0.9991425,0.00013898904,0.00040057235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038470494,0.0000027703288,0.00008845708,0.000031204356,0.0000016147816,0.000014506696,0.00027760124,0.0003488151,0.000043122505,0.9895744,0.009610858,0.0000029375642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037626638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020131702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008767785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005329336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040743533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03866726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552017794","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2869350","title":"Corporate and Trust Law Dimensions of the Trinity Western University Law School Debate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Corporate law; Corporate governance; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.02142264440486447,"score_gpt":0.2542373933007058,"score_spread":0.23281474889584136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552017794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15001874,0.0027822556,0.0024776806,0.3085229,0.0007648406,0.00004520325,0.00007901388,0.000035306068,0.535274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639602,0.00032663898,0.00027538266,0.011955429,0.00043761698,0.00005253941,0.0000128238435,0.00002962365,0.022949891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871132,0.0070486837,0.00029210758,0.001082545,0.002047474,0.0024160182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701886,0.019378286,0.0017916482,0.001265308,0.0025277087,0.0048483224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129883215,0.00020619802,0.00056043855,0.003312755,0.01905405,0.027887307,0.0017646049,0.015741637,0.016364887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040248267,0.0005742088,0.00042892317,0.0029490748,0.037852317,0.012486112,0.0073913094,0.01301916,0.000749245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010044693,0.000021549202,0.00035517363,0.0000066350417,0.0000016784575,0.000046938996,0.0048907385,0.00004880199,0.00002109863,0.9865442,0.0066770576,0.0013761941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048236456,0.000030399091,0.003980563,0.00021178366,0.00001797833,0.000059527163,0.024591165,0.00089004746,0.00020057891,0.8507818,0.11913318,0.000054635515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038759418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0654622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038759418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017491963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017329903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12691367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553335236","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3860","title":"De-Ciphering Self-Help","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Scholarship; Government (linguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.011420178437838158,"score_gpt":0.23900912723153353,"score_spread":0.22758894879369537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553335236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043909233,0.018926658,0.04497491,0.2781533,0.0044414513,0.00014276586,0.000098323675,0.00030434565,0.609049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8371899,0.01027788,0.010795786,0.052742958,0.0022062692,0.0002174435,0.00006980175,0.00025101937,0.08624888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157965,0.004460559,0.0003057719,0.0008912176,0.0017680727,0.0009946922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994948,0.0021647706,0.00063485716,0.0007729351,0.00083013077,0.00064925663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065097683,0.0004958634,0.0004744586,0.0012256217,0.004192412,0.008422566,0.0011434958,0.004154034,0.0053034592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010536635,0.00024005279,0.00049409806,0.0006366222,0.043094516,0.008542977,0.008363238,0.007906439,0.0018542495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008958233,0.000013395727,0.00023680092,0.000054608015,0.0000033287092,0.00007415797,0.01133496,0.000058920577,0.00013662613,0.97101396,0.008362464,0.00870168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017496828,0.000050277074,0.0006004025,0.0005153513,0.0000115957955,0.00039829698,0.010163663,0.00038675865,0.0006836798,0.47530326,0.5118424,0.000026784202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031524203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005198859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008422566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052502076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006830405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03809303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555408628","doi":"10.29173/alr795","title":"Watertight Compartments: Getting Back to the Constitutional Division of Powers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Presumption; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Flexibility (engineering); Division (mathematics); Law and economics; Separation of powers; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04875225404724249,"score_gpt":0.3701375574959828,"score_spread":0.32138530344874033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555408628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05236454,0.014094448,0.10980746,0.13739353,0.0011923556,0.00009086643,0.00013997973,0.00012213721,0.68479466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9248381,0.0046190172,0.014046573,0.019089274,0.000981801,0.00018720978,0.000067008616,0.00013602564,0.0360351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937278,0.0023826093,0.00021263119,0.0009104485,0.0019545164,0.00081198366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964952,0.0021003627,0.00020517029,0.0006212356,0.00037380058,0.00020417754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006446664,0.00034359796,0.0005153497,0.0013486217,0.0053240755,0.010775877,0.0016608387,0.0050857784,0.0043762242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009853521,0.00043487235,0.0005464751,0.001184131,0.06090511,0.018897148,0.0074810763,0.010449922,0.0005717027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.5453636e-7,8.593326e-7,0.000010119567,0.0000021329581,3.09112e-7,0.0000068525596,0.00036262054,0.000025698313,0.000015932663,0.9986505,0.00026813522,0.0006560777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005429178,0.000007789439,0.00010581232,0.000056192217,0.0000023631014,0.000021920401,0.0006165916,0.00014777522,0.00014528412,0.9470857,0.05179724,0.000007908386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013751644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012436137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013751644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009001348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008243817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065309644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556571509","doi":"","title":"Civil Procedure: Breach of what?: The Harman principle revisited","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSJ: Law Society of NSW Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Misconduct; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.025608532200379078,"score_gpt":0.3236943531339864,"score_spread":0.29808582093360736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556571509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012193653,0.02662521,0.05864659,0.5033921,0.0030025619,0.00010144486,0.00009296496,0.00007704281,0.3958684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.752053,0.016548296,0.019262811,0.15223745,0.0069794953,0.0004054888,0.000070347094,0.0002904131,0.052152745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9620576,0.017250227,0.0016976481,0.004788233,0.011232381,0.0029739395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97892135,0.015455929,0.0011123271,0.0017340543,0.0021068398,0.00066946005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029312054,0.0007849976,0.0018673083,0.0017618403,0.009654465,0.015052043,0.004989257,0.03384642,0.004825353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037846353,0.00079183705,0.0018336254,0.0020706365,0.109794475,0.023458233,0.0090220235,0.042370915,0.0016371335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022019374,0.0000028405489,0.000021896421,0.0000170385,0.0000018512293,0.00002774524,0.00061779225,0.000052432344,0.0000131851675,0.9962171,0.001544969,0.001480887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057659117,0.000006867482,0.00008351073,0.00018278311,0.000004034667,0.00012154031,0.00062752474,0.00021954294,0.000055184482,0.9716107,0.027069705,0.000012883901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02328618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013546785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03384642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011878128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023015488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15501887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556718980","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2002.11421416","title":"Lord Cooke of Thorndon's Final Appeal (<i>Delaware Mansions Ltd v Westminster City Council</i>)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Commonwealth; Art","score_opus":0.10216009995123092,"score_gpt":0.27387997332235225,"score_spread":0.17171987337112132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556718980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008130612,0.029004307,0.0008612242,0.3873128,0.010492402,0.00028185922,0.0025224013,0.00027246555,0.561122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050466478,0.003534833,0.000582532,0.23933947,0.001211728,0.00018846364,0.00038568943,0.000109727305,0.70418096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997712,0.00022546138,0.00012077358,0.0002870125,0.0010003343,0.0006543688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980647,0.0006807069,0.00009105707,0.00006348169,0.0008110846,0.00028901995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017758801,0.00058452203,0.0006050495,0.0009140875,0.01356037,0.0059733465,0.0017629747,0.018309066,0.047226794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008868622,0.0011449063,0.0007814781,0.00092518335,0.0027251951,0.002898729,0.002423195,0.01161624,0.013297647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020354997,0.000008264331,0.00034430364,0.000038968734,0.0000041364688,0.00019963838,0.00034427852,0.0000144340875,0.000103477134,0.015891315,0.9793854,0.0036454431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038841754,0.00002460853,0.0043287934,0.00033444673,0.000027852,0.00014938266,0.0013765838,0.00007022562,0.0003039604,0.0054054726,0.98788583,0.000054029908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4234008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7288038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4234008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008557525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011494611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84187263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557917075","doi":"","title":"The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era: Historical Vision and Legal Change, by James Q. Whitman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Romance; Law; Political science; Art; Art history; History; Literature; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02439302399369461,"score_gpt":0.2954558120262284,"score_spread":0.2710627880325338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557917075","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03539121,0.46929517,0.0011078719,0.27599397,0.004967581,0.0000164196,0.00013261304,0.00003432726,0.21306086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6677027,0.23389223,0.001353919,0.020811034,0.0051641343,0.000029983927,0.00008895466,0.00006119562,0.0708959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907553,0.0004217107,0.000044232973,0.00011787509,0.00018603855,0.00015461324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916136,0.00040051684,0.00015186473,0.000060335187,0.00013398948,0.000091890215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023061486,0.00036087292,0.00031527007,0.0019019652,0.0049059642,0.007307038,0.00060097384,0.001854426,0.0023240226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003953944,0.00033434105,0.00018333354,0.0032269014,0.016723348,0.007002002,0.0023492845,0.0031569805,0.0004670608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003416125,0.000026331038,0.0010185913,0.00016516348,0.000010120993,0.00020409873,0.017750813,0.00020786475,0.0000928275,0.8060581,0.12254196,0.05188992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048986753,0.000015691016,0.0030500472,0.000681175,0.000005720952,0.0002524408,0.009976315,0.0001371254,0.00012720122,0.08829828,0.89742714,0.000023937399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014625844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030691778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014625844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004928875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034101785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035761654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560235809","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3049","title":"Book Note: The Court Of Appeal For Ontario: Defining The Right Of Appeal, 1792-2013, by Christopher Moore","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Redress; Political science; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Law of the case; Sociology; Court of record; Jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.011915082872954832,"score_gpt":0.2762015473640066,"score_spread":0.26428646449105175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560235809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041199187,0.1734947,0.0013332252,0.25498456,0.011593346,0.00017150913,0.0045776675,0.00008307303,0.54964197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04791951,0.06800963,0.0012986892,0.03973491,0.0046895123,0.00011563742,0.0012286541,0.00018818575,0.8368153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986162,0.0001030744,0.000050181683,0.00019622262,0.0008427427,0.00019147871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913764,0.00020322815,0.000048434154,0.00002673528,0.00044594173,0.00013792633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008597751,0.00061024877,0.00027850267,0.0014538262,0.00819822,0.0059186476,0.0011113363,0.0038573216,0.015253678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028903147,0.0007351618,0.00028348496,0.0027565132,0.005904499,0.0033573185,0.0013681243,0.0036358226,0.0028297994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006058511,0.000005287871,0.00031817477,0.000059708003,0.000001602505,0.00004017971,0.0019144169,0.00006500432,0.00007678344,0.04957217,0.93976456,0.0081760045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013967625,0.0000011891659,0.001389983,0.000090498215,0.0000010321903,0.00001915603,0.000488307,0.000018346434,0.000023231558,0.0019970497,0.99596393,0.000005914408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9114934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97230756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08850658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07283647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058115005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5284681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560622901","doi":"","title":"The Tudor Law of Treason, an Introduction, by John Bellamy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01480436866576484,"score_gpt":0.2659887861679658,"score_spread":0.25118441750220094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560622901","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006439378,0.5469316,0.001960547,0.32841974,0.025305757,0.000022411203,0.0001370145,0.000044090415,0.096534885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04933195,0.41393766,0.0038606708,0.20805149,0.09086822,0.00021628475,0.00016789592,0.00025712154,0.23330873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984475,0.00055821793,0.00008743013,0.00022933744,0.0005450352,0.00013247792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695146,0.0022791647,0.00012308708,0.00009609299,0.00041944603,0.00013069555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026255834,0.0008352491,0.00084800075,0.0026078892,0.0050257547,0.006671506,0.0015666889,0.009291063,0.0077070305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009268876,0.00074769015,0.0006110578,0.002460396,0.0117294295,0.010793244,0.0021039846,0.011433479,0.0023881805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119785755,0.000019430061,0.00012367053,0.00016535394,0.000006174852,0.000053132084,0.0006051186,0.0001464822,0.00003751427,0.36534047,0.61210155,0.021389117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007029466,0.000006565005,0.00036542022,0.0007401408,0.0000047688013,0.00007529605,0.00043496134,0.00013983235,0.000027398466,0.1499586,0.84822017,0.000019746596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024697257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04212671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024697257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062471586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048188637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049106956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560716322","doi":"10.3138/cjh.48.3.479","title":"<i>The Invention of Law in the West</i>, by Aldo Schiavone, translated by Jeremy Carden and Anthony Shugaar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.017379339556552832,"score_gpt":0.2600622493423793,"score_spread":0.2426829097858265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560716322","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010125607,0.6253115,0.0010830982,0.07148682,0.039720144,0.000043502867,0.00044744278,0.00017545471,0.26071942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020298664,0.22158574,0.0015654108,0.024248794,0.015369979,0.00008244718,0.00060102914,0.00041081817,0.71583706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995426,0.00008946554,0.000023730754,0.00008039549,0.0002030102,0.00006081455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996729,0.00014306273,0.00003314871,0.000017646651,0.00009321645,0.00004010738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004718807,0.0014040064,0.00043264817,0.0011878082,0.0022062862,0.005099518,0.00063903915,0.0016945363,0.03564686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017653401,0.00050351507,0.00036430638,0.001467092,0.0031134896,0.0061558587,0.001599819,0.003705471,0.017469876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012288225,0.0000063886982,0.000071878414,0.00017454756,0.0000026942698,0.000039324794,0.0007089681,0.000018683739,0.000114613315,0.018918753,0.9499487,0.029983053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010534641,0.0000026779308,0.0001915655,0.00013726037,7.5236863e-7,0.000059396938,0.00026620115,0.000007425718,0.000037005295,0.0016951197,0.9975988,0.0000027877907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015419049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035495922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03564686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023639007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024923661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119250596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560948472","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1306","title":"Aboriginal Title and the Provinces after Tsilhqot’in Nation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic Justice; High Court; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03704934952863398,"score_gpt":0.35246408280565816,"score_spread":0.3154147332770242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560948472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18216802,0.032794252,0.0021246192,0.040651366,0.0007195364,0.000065655164,0.000241218,0.000032325217,0.74120307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94295776,0.0036135712,0.0006452327,0.0064730234,0.00010402509,0.00002964421,0.00005337296,0.000008949979,0.046114486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996876,0.0006972498,0.00012228312,0.00035937925,0.0007732395,0.0011717867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799573,0.0010775161,0.00016465891,0.00010147679,0.00047852052,0.00018217755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024443192,0.00012265786,0.0003618623,0.0007329548,0.01018925,0.0064531756,0.0014214829,0.0035548308,0.0030122201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042794906,0.0003337099,0.00033839743,0.0012272022,0.0115377,0.0016797851,0.0023075293,0.0046627256,0.00022998644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024370853,0.000009025588,0.0021426869,0.000080781756,0.0000072650005,0.00038675676,0.010869638,0.00012248471,0.0002389263,0.9765902,0.0038749052,0.005652962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016726364,0.00012443832,0.055628758,0.001433243,0.0001162229,0.00072873844,0.0283999,0.00057167787,0.0019566687,0.1992636,0.7114552,0.000154279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75493693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8948723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24506307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021317942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03947648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49301255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561384485","doi":"","title":"Problems arising in compensating unconcious plaintiffs for loss of amenities of life: a comparative survey","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; High Court; Appeal; Common law; Political science; Trial court; Position (finance); English law; Precedent; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.16089085258807517,"score_gpt":0.3683810508009158,"score_spread":0.20749019821284065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561384485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42844868,0.31240898,0.004433735,0.048908,0.0007478218,0.00018552356,0.00020983613,0.000036376663,0.20462102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83155584,0.15332957,0.0016692035,0.0052522467,0.00059778785,0.000087106986,0.00015984355,0.0000276496,0.007320748],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98610747,0.00610511,0.0012922874,0.000970503,0.0035839593,0.0019407514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95138294,0.03498962,0.0050011724,0.0009516264,0.0062725637,0.0014019995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021557858,0.00031502187,0.0006545328,0.0078026033,0.0071722353,0.008224355,0.0021177821,0.0065874713,0.0050705695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053788908,0.00058451144,0.00076778245,0.010225536,0.0076499344,0.008610767,0.004470173,0.003449623,0.0006124323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005285314,0.0012687373,0.09752048,0.003758671,0.00015027,0.0039041585,0.07198682,0.0015396602,0.0011313919,0.32219148,0.022356827,0.473663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007082678,0.0018294998,0.21000217,0.007180437,0.00021198214,0.008913489,0.2474627,0.0013049893,0.0019991458,0.032301597,0.4885355,0.0001877447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015445712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031768728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021557858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072598835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006731735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114010155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564925869","doi":"10.1017/s0012217316000676","title":"Getting the Baseline Right—or—Why I’m Right and Everyone Else is Wrong, in each of the Two Senses of ‘Why’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Baseline (sea); Philosophy; Dividend; Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02322308472191322,"score_gpt":0.29747906113543904,"score_spread":0.27425597641352584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564925869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010662144,0.0038164386,0.049332272,0.5642712,0.00545078,0.00011180807,0.0001290829,0.00017979246,0.3660465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68198097,0.0024585074,0.023674343,0.19051997,0.0020228606,0.0003237923,0.00013393347,0.0003989613,0.0984867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654776,0.020577759,0.0014761996,0.0042654206,0.005175858,0.0030272105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98334855,0.007582519,0.0019868608,0.0024292504,0.0031290546,0.0015237626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023111647,0.0007311887,0.00094125,0.0009503111,0.012734027,0.016603537,0.0027113962,0.019030187,0.012844289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041834734,0.000605644,0.0010471141,0.0009854678,0.05564186,0.021123802,0.00973581,0.020730946,0.004745319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016896038,0.000016675243,0.0003196823,0.000047003537,0.000011759416,0.00012767606,0.01548227,0.000043210974,0.00021414978,0.9443648,0.035538908,0.003816972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020695945,0.000035103105,0.0004959624,0.00030368243,0.000014245701,0.00049484434,0.02469731,0.00036414445,0.0005409023,0.65298355,0.31996223,0.00008731552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009880358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009052188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023111647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006386713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008631965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12222749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565501628","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n1p1","title":"Comparative Study of Hire-purchase in Iran and English Common Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Business; Possession (linguistics); Payment; Law; Common law; English law; Debt; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.053750809646709134,"score_gpt":0.3649089069009958,"score_spread":0.31115809725428667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565501628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816088,0.0006729642,0.0001319982,0.00040863708,0.000013382935,0.000013481881,0.000044930348,0.0000018737214,0.017103972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825305,0.00036891035,0.000066498425,0.00006456605,0.00000978654,0.0000042994775,0.000051295563,0.0000023184123,0.0011792681],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985667,0.0003555092,0.000095029514,0.00014120614,0.00052900997,0.00031261603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963983,0.0017266357,0.000970728,0.00009491743,0.0006005784,0.00020889634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015938621,0.00010328594,0.00023553119,0.0019759669,0.0014515519,0.0018790889,0.00034873106,0.00029617077,0.0051461617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006865313,0.000103174316,0.00015182934,0.0034265365,0.002040976,0.0026954943,0.0008836401,0.0006750903,0.00022775712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002177108,0.00046106277,0.53382057,0.00040797208,0.00005135572,0.0033247387,0.2961339,0.00031668367,0.00059643114,0.072974324,0.005476347,0.086218886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010417573,0.0001221513,0.68908095,0.00013768618,0.000022823942,0.00061926554,0.2822557,0.0005762223,0.00018194104,0.0019487635,0.025020441,0.000023618715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0315504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05428695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0315504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026836519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015371828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06273353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572655473","doi":"","title":"The Disposition of Human Remains and Organ Donation: Increasing Testamentary Freedom while Upholding the No Property Rule","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Property (philosophy); Disposition; Law; Estate planning; Settlor; Estate; Common law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10131306123383885,"score_gpt":0.34134805215230685,"score_spread":0.240034990918468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572655473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16243905,0.0022813675,0.0093263015,0.08055584,0.00032451947,0.00019047775,0.0001537189,0.00007286916,0.74465585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386313,0.00095333735,0.0052637523,0.008068943,0.00010741393,0.00008142736,0.000054497425,0.000020650987,0.046818636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988415,0.0031028662,0.00050545676,0.00089620665,0.0041138236,0.002966602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906596,0.0029756962,0.0010836328,0.001279421,0.0020987617,0.0019028472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008980823,0.00021177428,0.00031855487,0.0011987425,0.012857058,0.007450583,0.0016313773,0.0031466403,0.004599827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015616269,0.00031124844,0.00041268737,0.001119903,0.027175812,0.002801533,0.006869729,0.0034717296,0.0004306507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004193913,0.00009064737,0.016012575,0.00006364387,0.000015326152,0.0004970409,0.015225538,0.00082240097,0.0008479802,0.90983427,0.012824307,0.043724254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008665024,0.00019482382,0.09456534,0.001087432,0.00008052778,0.00089712586,0.024066353,0.0016269285,0.0022394005,0.21215953,0.6627764,0.00021944693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7937349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9339274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7937349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04232612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.100291066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4149596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W257596894","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Relationships: Ensuring the Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Judgement; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.05168469315605677,"score_gpt":0.30202445182586796,"score_spread":0.2503397586698112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W257596894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063082166,0.0015173261,0.29864115,0.056878816,0.0010901783,0.00034938325,0.000074751384,0.00023285841,0.57813334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9463897,0.0003907034,0.024135567,0.005323784,0.00049569487,0.00026936765,0.000034060828,0.00011337952,0.022847658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9436905,0.029259287,0.0027107263,0.009028192,0.01023869,0.005072707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93074566,0.02709674,0.008430779,0.020087574,0.009802677,0.0038365363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041955024,0.00063873467,0.0013912919,0.0019639996,0.013162186,0.011830884,0.003771558,0.012347138,0.008021459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10973544,0.0008836018,0.0011079784,0.0014893308,0.06118561,0.018193478,0.014739655,0.009526462,0.0033134401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015459926,0.000016629252,0.00039365762,0.000023555816,0.000013148614,0.00014538797,0.0040563513,0.00020753994,0.00020063561,0.9866468,0.0016449961,0.0066358713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035177447,0.000047829464,0.00050413475,0.00015632402,0.000020090622,0.0002910574,0.0017055448,0.0010898031,0.00060808635,0.9495305,0.045957766,0.000053622734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048551545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038613123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041955024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039350954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01293954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22188205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582736669","doi":"10.7202/1038620ar","title":"Publicité des droits et prescription acquisitive : des liaisons dangereuses?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.04628779737563087,"score_gpt":0.32180928803265063,"score_spread":0.27552149065701975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582736669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036971606,0.026393525,0.006146719,0.45903754,0.0011556058,0.00010655761,0.00043531903,0.00013279078,0.46962038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75442356,0.012964255,0.0021382568,0.07726349,0.0010377236,0.00013261242,0.00020708561,0.00012945574,0.15170358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842933,0.0040509384,0.0004900203,0.0015820095,0.0056559998,0.003927806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824905,0.0066873147,0.0016360369,0.0010588577,0.0060777445,0.0020495984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009504706,0.00043894595,0.0006160276,0.0019290211,0.011636454,0.015110562,0.0024759702,0.010434367,0.013617031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02347916,0.0006109148,0.00080122805,0.0021666423,0.027130982,0.007058777,0.004558733,0.0131679345,0.0014384236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027869542,0.000037136553,0.0027563432,0.00015675968,0.000018639095,0.00030013573,0.007872876,0.0003368851,0.00015427564,0.9289132,0.043731008,0.015694965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066665874,0.000090201676,0.017970348,0.0020624837,0.00008159619,0.0004687295,0.014892457,0.0010252601,0.00069334736,0.1316581,0.830828,0.0001628262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8424261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84782726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8424261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06499227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.117272094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47155416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582939754","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2905141","title":"From Babyselling to Boilerplate: Reflections on the Limits of the Infrastructures of the Market","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Polity; Law and economics; Underwriting; Black market; Property market; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.03610992550963973,"score_gpt":0.35063830225389303,"score_spread":0.3145283767442533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582939754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016382048,0.012853717,0.0070527643,0.6110255,0.001154552,0.000023430915,0.00010102478,0.00007667346,0.35133022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8412199,0.009571881,0.0021961634,0.10073034,0.0017088704,0.000118738295,0.00005245701,0.00030071504,0.044100888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924171,0.0031479958,0.0001954771,0.00090603495,0.0015092766,0.0018241724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848024,0.010705721,0.0007088825,0.0010526609,0.0014332819,0.0012971024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011342368,0.00055919285,0.0007899307,0.0013380488,0.009773976,0.022964623,0.003491511,0.024101676,0.021702845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02448349,0.0007363689,0.0007910154,0.0018021772,0.08240589,0.042446204,0.0137051,0.025499653,0.0018226722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008447669,0.000005074044,0.00005637053,0.00001991624,0.0000013760524,0.000042200656,0.0042159664,0.00007183326,0.000033725635,0.9854241,0.008475384,0.0016456901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129571445,0.000017396264,0.00031849957,0.00037230022,0.000005340878,0.00011135036,0.015532782,0.00018879514,0.00023457805,0.6821887,0.30098382,0.000033541033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033211686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028579695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033211686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014399942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012872372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10447943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584415349","doi":"10.82308/32329","title":"The irreducible core of the trust","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LSE Research Online","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.3127236345703143,"score_gpt":0.507409967473694,"score_spread":0.19468633290337972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584415349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1525181,0.0037757696,0.20646493,0.028287044,0.00053754426,0.000265041,0.00014254158,0.00018400009,0.607825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823599,0.0009376956,0.0072546694,0.0005771386,0.000095945325,0.000055437675,0.000034054898,0.000020261701,0.008664996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900752,0.003870305,0.0006355286,0.001172521,0.0031321307,0.0011142573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925108,0.0031866177,0.001188738,0.0011586479,0.0012614123,0.0006938048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005722317,0.00028276237,0.0004893757,0.0015528619,0.0051693544,0.009110779,0.0011006744,0.0023607982,0.004054488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012376694,0.00040392374,0.0006410152,0.0010375679,0.029336873,0.010051814,0.0072153904,0.0033923232,0.0006273474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004685389,0.0000046332852,0.00023212437,0.00002278122,0.0000025549853,0.000059041602,0.003505062,0.00015461018,0.000088740795,0.99198455,0.00040615385,0.0035351813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010789188,0.00005422732,0.001560587,0.00028806215,0.000019584582,0.00032009243,0.0069633476,0.0015856548,0.00037790454,0.9182557,0.070527576,0.00003650012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008163269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052768444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009110779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00670635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009369972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04865825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584583480","doi":"10.5040/9781509909513.ch-013","title":"Legitimate Expectations in Canada: Soft Law and Tax Administration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soft law; Administration (probate law); Tax law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Double taxation; International law","score_opus":0.03015367588382838,"score_gpt":0.2605341547951771,"score_spread":0.23038047891134872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584583480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23074104,0.0040803216,0.005491747,0.13159591,0.0004248959,0.0001315798,0.000739311,0.00016020158,0.62663496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643668,0.0011689481,0.0009075396,0.0048017567,0.000045711466,0.000018512059,0.000102423845,0.000032130487,0.02855623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191743,0.00090607983,0.00014669866,0.0005237878,0.0038517464,0.0026542754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913223,0.0016070901,0.0005133824,0.00025124484,0.0040983884,0.0022075933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028044814,0.00030749117,0.00033597462,0.0017415149,0.025454972,0.0114077935,0.0014073505,0.0020629321,0.008084495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009904038,0.0003902495,0.0005151024,0.0027020704,0.015410061,0.0030815864,0.0034494116,0.00584871,0.00036996257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032265692,0.00003630865,0.016235424,0.000061921855,0.000014151493,0.0003335142,0.027700404,0.0008204057,0.000251731,0.9003138,0.029937152,0.024263063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045415745,0.000058462752,0.108250886,0.0006488423,0.000072713054,0.00030304908,0.08154848,0.0052631563,0.0013006761,0.18633513,0.6157886,0.00038457097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27547038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27547038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33750492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8403517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587732659","doi":"","title":"The Volenti Defence under Australian and Canadian Law: A Comparative View","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Tort; Common law; Law; Political science; Comparative law; Liability","score_opus":0.029842691373746056,"score_gpt":0.3144486417484906,"score_spread":0.2846059503747445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587732659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22964722,0.014800034,0.0021974924,0.029538356,0.00020230727,0.000052600597,0.00012410559,0.000017296694,0.72342056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984201,0.0045731086,0.00063802034,0.001189415,0.000063110485,0.000013583583,0.00004337756,0.00000606036,0.009272263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907198,0.0017667981,0.00019898213,0.00060593744,0.004664016,0.0020444598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251807,0.0027584657,0.0007509655,0.00030000214,0.0030098206,0.0006626311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050981804,0.00030518248,0.0005456502,0.0071429918,0.010389942,0.008763176,0.0025208245,0.0034497858,0.0048787342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01653907,0.0003154835,0.00058770704,0.0064226044,0.023030354,0.003672638,0.0031263328,0.0033398643,0.0001924138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029696472,0.000017972972,0.0034682807,0.0001404136,0.000020554262,0.00024707007,0.022688048,0.0006562999,0.00012702259,0.9519345,0.003000432,0.017669838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043877015,0.00018256626,0.20495814,0.0022411684,0.00032461903,0.0012277275,0.120248735,0.0077238167,0.0004649523,0.30889326,0.3534064,0.00028471363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93098575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9504237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094180115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094180115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061007213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6833278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588559877","doi":"","title":"You Can't Fire Me: The Problems with Wrongful Dismissal Damages in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Damages; Unfair dismissal; Law; Labour law; Context (archaeology); Warrant; Common law; Plaintiff; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08403024437334014,"score_gpt":0.3168355486805888,"score_spread":0.23280530430724863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588559877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30248958,0.01642224,0.00517132,0.33845076,0.0011052509,0.00035625693,0.0007405564,0.00017458998,0.33508945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9210128,0.0065555377,0.0029581534,0.023144789,0.00015950836,0.00006685528,0.00014116828,0.00009127722,0.045869745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98280394,0.0015088049,0.0005946632,0.0011363886,0.009590224,0.0043660053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821898,0.0055608777,0.0008891306,0.0005366152,0.008583792,0.0022397486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009011141,0.00044576218,0.00069974415,0.0032055199,0.031855185,0.013317171,0.0052893334,0.006742393,0.0071212566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03157259,0.0007464247,0.0008705454,0.005241193,0.010201468,0.0030281977,0.0054781083,0.008824287,0.00035416646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001528568,0.00018537595,0.04640684,0.00045387776,0.00015887621,0.0042835604,0.034558505,0.004714292,0.00084051123,0.57401836,0.15066059,0.18356638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018957393,0.00018675807,0.16363001,0.0019802118,0.00051460136,0.0023978692,0.0967471,0.021079725,0.0023624392,0.12866513,0.5811426,0.0011039758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99871814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18774918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18774918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28122506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9420958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589260615","doi":"10.5430/elr.v6n2p1","title":"The Cult of Dignity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Linguistics Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Cult; Sociology; Stewardship (theology); Law; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Honor; Individualism; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.20535287773857808,"score_gpt":0.5194253883391381,"score_spread":0.31407251060056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589260615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039534695,0.012332981,0.013956932,0.16659686,0.0022695293,0.000045433044,0.00007650908,0.00008962142,0.7650975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9147907,0.004095627,0.0031186473,0.021030363,0.0010331535,0.00006845383,0.00003678119,0.00009251052,0.05573371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99198323,0.0037118373,0.00030781166,0.00086382753,0.0023269302,0.00080641307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947588,0.0020799993,0.0005767924,0.0007701034,0.00075085816,0.0010634646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005422521,0.00041885657,0.00050097896,0.0009527086,0.008715289,0.011166721,0.0011245699,0.003550707,0.00471733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010698667,0.0002717812,0.0003220132,0.0007463387,0.06724904,0.01072425,0.0106240595,0.0077477572,0.0011065782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060306743,0.0000047163267,0.0002252321,0.000020801273,0.0000022324332,0.00008023725,0.009845159,0.000025811823,0.00009206171,0.9778401,0.0059043383,0.0059533794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010276587,0.000038775517,0.0008239704,0.00036915593,0.000005497189,0.00043411597,0.011148229,0.00018157133,0.0002690941,0.5959469,0.39074486,0.000027482118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005483309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00471466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011166721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075033656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061109187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054440975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589706160","doi":"","title":"Debtor-induced payments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Personal property; Creditor; Security interest; Business; Entitlement (fair division); Debt; Payment; Collateral; Legislation; Uniform Commercial Code; Law and economics; Law; Finance; Economics; Property (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.046458767688263854,"score_gpt":0.3576727632583232,"score_spread":0.31121399557005935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589706160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018230611,0.0012485329,0.0074929977,0.006763284,0.0005355566,0.00035122488,0.0007162692,0.00014673591,0.9645147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38641524,0.0030094872,0.0077923895,0.015505771,0.0005681876,0.00056912965,0.00088176597,0.000089059875,0.5851691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842504,0.0025046626,0.0012622069,0.0013653896,0.008468967,0.0021482047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270624,0.0016348299,0.000937667,0.0014988863,0.0027599598,0.00046241566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066185677,0.00045869465,0.0004967978,0.0017986072,0.0032908344,0.006104441,0.002420923,0.005572408,0.014439409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018369775,0.00077644206,0.000978881,0.0016718928,0.003891204,0.0029850348,0.0037887406,0.006608127,0.0041535133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014719025,0.000047669724,0.0010271955,0.00006187734,0.000008206118,0.00017080695,0.0006972014,0.00015766508,0.00038239188,0.96555203,0.019701757,0.012178546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049584378,0.00011149817,0.009018149,0.00045771478,0.00003739343,0.0006659349,0.0005582367,0.00088514516,0.0020594387,0.10602875,0.88005966,0.000068510475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04643295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049663022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04643295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006483562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019559136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09232533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590859374","doi":"10.7939/r3f766n31","title":"The codification of commercial law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Uniform Commercial Code; Obsolescence; Personal property; Negotiable instrument; Political science; Property (philosophy); Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01547546675863264,"score_gpt":0.22210852185438565,"score_spread":0.206633055095753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590859374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023312252,0.006773188,0.15474977,0.04455599,0.0009952461,0.00038104612,0.0004015695,0.00045228258,0.76837873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7034068,0.004181497,0.16523659,0.008528752,0.00040682245,0.00033869798,0.00048447194,0.0002981304,0.11711823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98824173,0.0030180453,0.0011374981,0.0013973283,0.0052034673,0.0010019195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983942,0.0045994762,0.0009729419,0.00383838,0.006046699,0.00060060003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014191653,0.00044468738,0.00067701546,0.0036621948,0.0069865882,0.015607513,0.002986338,0.0031848727,0.0040975213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022791483,0.00057718856,0.00061416306,0.0047392696,0.027492905,0.008568986,0.005646287,0.0072385524,0.00066186144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019677577,0.0000028045094,0.00011691024,0.000014478893,0.0000013546829,0.000018788414,0.0013152874,0.00014600532,0.000042825428,0.98484844,0.001957444,0.01153371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009124717,0.0000104774745,0.00075300783,0.0005755598,0.000008644465,0.00012889462,0.0027846417,0.0019097994,0.00070683844,0.6899628,0.30310643,0.000043858032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3603726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30212837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3603726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0322343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05370004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591772563","doi":"10.18384/2310-6794-2016-4-8-14","title":"BHASIN V HRYNEW - THE BASIS OF UNDERSTANDING GOOD FAITH -AS AN ORGANIZING PRINCIPLE IN CANADIAN COMMON LAW","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Jurisprudence)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Good faith; Basis (linear algebra); Faith; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03302920243979889,"score_gpt":0.27278039412411403,"score_spread":0.23975119168431513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591772563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12337173,0.0085278265,0.02503015,0.048307538,0.00036485912,0.0002085143,0.00026181407,0.00007051134,0.79385704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787354,0.0010482211,0.0036207733,0.0013929629,0.000038793303,0.000041910815,0.000027904061,0.000018800443,0.015075416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692434,0.0009752668,0.00008767789,0.00041403188,0.0007167374,0.00088186277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982981,0.0007971998,0.00012287132,0.00019563551,0.0003920889,0.00019412344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003916994,0.0002885679,0.0004276229,0.0023733003,0.011071001,0.0067980886,0.0011897513,0.0032812592,0.0023845423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048053223,0.00032280837,0.00035548268,0.0027335447,0.04712424,0.0042054057,0.0032475914,0.0034677745,0.00019097533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014323701,8.366622e-7,0.000067848276,0.0000051529073,5.7556554e-7,0.000013187567,0.0016019609,0.0000533306,0.00001711579,0.9968489,0.0004274983,0.00096219877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011742878,0.000006605344,0.001503327,0.000101745274,0.000007154132,0.000050513412,0.0047477363,0.000691448,0.00015998232,0.93595314,0.056735042,0.00003156322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76003873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7674992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23996127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035827346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04314578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48274887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591938228","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jlw016","title":"Private Authority and the Role of Rights: A Reply","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Focus (optics); Relation (database); Action (physics); Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02681493462528991,"score_gpt":0.3498208490075742,"score_spread":0.3230059143822843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591938228","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024804796,0.00070135633,0.00017882539,0.9937238,0.0031114873,0.0000037029954,0.000022673605,0.000011172601,0.001998934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018417861,0.0014289327,0.00036773033,0.9578181,0.012186293,0.000051077866,0.00002449,0.000091082205,0.009614411],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98904,0.004569727,0.0005330089,0.0024691145,0.002071743,0.0013163066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573782,0.03314979,0.001202305,0.0014624133,0.0050966656,0.0017106568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016854906,0.0013413887,0.0019392429,0.0014529501,0.009815585,0.010532052,0.007524442,0.060851894,0.012569285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053401053,0.00094600837,0.0019261378,0.0024523118,0.023023542,0.030830968,0.010048203,0.062462382,0.0038572887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027951339,0.000014446607,0.00021322654,0.00011859595,0.000010956723,0.0003580345,0.0050678477,0.00011938417,0.0000896407,0.17921902,0.81232554,0.002435438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060176793,0.000030882708,0.0009313091,0.0008450153,0.000027649437,0.000441205,0.017666155,0.00068448065,0.00039214516,0.14179784,0.83695394,0.0001691322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01844061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013763321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060851894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012775589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071950345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092693806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592884096","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016057","title":"Trust in Quebec and Czech Law: Autonomous Patrimonies?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01813549540509396,"score_gpt":0.28439729509663075,"score_spread":0.2662617996915368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592884096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15903923,0.15982676,0.0054694754,0.17140876,0.0014955795,0.00008180833,0.00066957256,0.00009406477,0.5019148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622217,0.015084469,0.0005114815,0.0043646656,0.00012785532,0.000017854169,0.00008158716,0.000016979682,0.017573472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966642,0.00082105055,0.00013377448,0.0003881306,0.00097641465,0.0010163704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960485,0.0013275377,0.00047873968,0.00021558329,0.0013587426,0.00057083665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028192354,0.00025998807,0.00043399187,0.0019998718,0.007070343,0.011414556,0.001107674,0.0022540973,0.0060789566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00690274,0.00023316631,0.00035040083,0.0033572915,0.012032067,0.005439105,0.0023230186,0.0030272,0.00027951723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043394088,0.00001824152,0.004475598,0.00026240334,0.000039541035,0.0004949113,0.008558651,0.00045148042,0.00016753949,0.92701286,0.020732466,0.037742965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048240046,0.00004700999,0.05566196,0.0024208261,0.000106494255,0.00069545006,0.036804453,0.0018386585,0.00042862626,0.10733918,0.79438436,0.00022478624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94481605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95737183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08015097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08015097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05837947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5815387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593009053","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v6n1p1","title":"Abolishing the Crime of Public Nuisance and Modernising That of Public Indecency","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Business; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.47124426631773797,"score_gpt":0.5169081096011175,"score_spread":0.04566384328337958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593009053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057153895,0.008326017,0.08827613,0.1278259,0.0021791325,0.00017283946,0.00012565263,0.00025255777,0.71568793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90341944,0.0025691758,0.02264095,0.020932656,0.0017263283,0.00029639975,0.000055762444,0.00019970156,0.04815961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773473,0.00910023,0.0010587273,0.00309667,0.006406177,0.0029909345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715579,0.012068019,0.0034076567,0.008523217,0.0034515592,0.0009916695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016586496,0.00077112345,0.0018283015,0.002439184,0.005267464,0.008240816,0.0032011608,0.011081014,0.006183412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039034158,0.00084203394,0.0014795194,0.001178475,0.07808476,0.012911774,0.010996627,0.020229092,0.0010798933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006610288,0.000013087609,0.0000813646,0.000023546803,0.000004191157,0.000012343238,0.00037335505,0.00012657885,0.0000920395,0.99561936,0.0008094037,0.0028381313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022384533,0.000031185085,0.00058411533,0.00017691024,0.000015655503,0.000080660095,0.00033129397,0.000318686,0.0006003672,0.9592008,0.03860963,0.000028381564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005629056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005376167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016586496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058391136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0137237925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087718844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593491886","doi":"10.21991/c94h4w","title":"The Incremental Evolution of National Receivership Law and the Elusive Search for Federal Purpose","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Receivership; Legislation; Political science; Ultra vires; Statute of limitations; Bankruptcy; Doctrine","score_opus":0.03989411658067844,"score_gpt":0.3321334183834593,"score_spread":0.29223930180278085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593491886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11864482,0.0030075437,0.010021446,0.113658935,0.0003293787,0.000040740215,0.00019064595,0.00014266974,0.75396377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533925,0.00065421074,0.0029660268,0.0062483987,0.0001162146,0.000020089667,0.000051700656,0.00003994378,0.036510896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946163,0.0006867984,0.00014928136,0.0010027904,0.0019728513,0.0015720103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942595,0.0016853395,0.00043936732,0.0006044908,0.0022781873,0.00073315337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006269813,0.00015312083,0.00033004227,0.0020587447,0.012155962,0.012144755,0.0012836502,0.004398588,0.003916239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011375836,0.00037784624,0.0003628724,0.0018677749,0.039383344,0.00501202,0.0032504052,0.006140833,0.00037284786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004344198,0.0000038143323,0.00057395065,0.0000049811033,0.0000014428064,0.000025724767,0.001947589,0.000073387106,0.000062020306,0.98963696,0.0027717594,0.0048940866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026585265,0.000029546722,0.013794015,0.00020524535,0.00003909492,0.00025032312,0.0059952717,0.0015724541,0.00086927984,0.475286,0.5018519,0.00008034283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7389589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8422832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7389589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07852274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066896185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56972504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594172847","doi":"","title":"Personal property securities legislation: Analysing the new lexicon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Personal property; Property (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Tangible property; Lexicon; Supreme court; Linguistics; Sociology; Property law; Law and economics; Political science; Property rights; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04429371174990055,"score_gpt":0.3279172351920104,"score_spread":0.28362352344210984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594172847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077627264,0.026067026,0.024435136,0.11414045,0.001428313,0.00011026031,0.00053560414,0.00017266616,0.75548327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9054757,0.0191399,0.021240743,0.010683409,0.0012820825,0.00026235357,0.0007548533,0.0002577104,0.04090328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584717,0.002002241,0.00027081286,0.00031730818,0.0013386324,0.00022386372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543494,0.0031809877,0.00030009344,0.00026718163,0.0007124422,0.00010427371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042286087,0.0002301334,0.00047377485,0.0062975874,0.004407951,0.010483332,0.0009873403,0.0022302074,0.0036278577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006487452,0.0005155799,0.00045614762,0.0057715992,0.016009485,0.011207468,0.00340668,0.0048265737,0.0007859872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042034385,0.000004841239,0.00025500567,0.00003965436,0.0000019901513,0.00013275196,0.01592656,0.00006328529,0.00012475663,0.96988475,0.006196582,0.007365641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014554007,0.000017428256,0.0029777428,0.00060613744,0.000012587615,0.00035794254,0.025847144,0.0012201255,0.00036459632,0.26785454,0.7006963,0.000030904943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031099474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0471481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031099474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012077925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007664786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08763188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594432468","doi":"","title":"Re Indalex: The confluence of pension, insolvency, and fiduciary law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Insolvency; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Creditor; Pension; Business; Bankruptcy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.051694270192047136,"score_gpt":0.3481389749984826,"score_spread":0.2964447048064355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594432468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029013962,0.022285886,0.0023474644,0.15177958,0.0012714908,0.00009462204,0.00030510686,0.0001834688,0.7927184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.504154,0.005256068,0.0020937086,0.06242066,0.00046497287,0.000086129774,0.0001421864,0.00013323716,0.42524895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889965,0.000875397,0.00020621812,0.0011914877,0.005396967,0.0033333933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969606,0.0010791186,0.00017069202,0.00017854385,0.001091652,0.0005194904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031986253,0.0005176493,0.00047177568,0.0013306374,0.019579537,0.013223338,0.002360541,0.01242389,0.0058143176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008736308,0.00072092324,0.0005725441,0.0012408657,0.021414677,0.004051789,0.0038953514,0.010422709,0.00063610845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012349121,0.0000071798872,0.00056651153,0.000030575506,0.0000061750998,0.0005621983,0.005494671,0.000111749934,0.00024136006,0.9311484,0.05314291,0.008675838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030556283,0.000017959686,0.005940876,0.00038092321,0.00004357818,0.00047123834,0.0076915957,0.00066328276,0.0009234629,0.08932596,0.894383,0.00012750644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.114826545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13187546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8331288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25946021","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0126311","title":"Remarks on David Daube’s Lectures on Sale, with Special Attention to the Liber Homo and Res Extra Commercium","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Section (typography); Subject (documents); Value (mathematics); Classics; Special section; Law; History; Library science; Political science; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.009162149377698726,"score_gpt":0.27714206438183975,"score_spread":0.26797991500414103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25946021","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023748813,0.04035973,0.00031567347,0.46705964,0.4813729,0.00001428807,0.00017756956,0.00008198195,0.010380793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061379913,0.029317277,0.00072607276,0.4911855,0.3205318,0.000045924844,0.0001916737,0.00026063868,0.15160331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800164,0.00047554716,0.000103523766,0.00042399592,0.00075041945,0.00024480987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966658,0.0009284799,0.00015977421,0.00009437689,0.0011194538,0.0010321648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002481572,0.001520054,0.00095674,0.0012294269,0.0025761558,0.0046315887,0.0015671423,0.006321079,0.029690782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009710236,0.00035735828,0.00092291593,0.00065935473,0.0020531993,0.0036201335,0.002692372,0.012150197,0.020612208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015755733,0.0000054251004,0.000051885963,0.000027772925,0.0000035758762,0.000054551943,0.000024543762,0.000009392014,0.000051128867,0.0012758614,0.9923017,0.006178363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004830262,0.0000068150944,0.00012779345,0.000055525048,0.0000021130809,0.00012208449,0.000046167686,0.000012383536,0.00003440226,0.00061782816,0.9989613,0.000008661987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00565693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010403487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029690782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025715798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001992776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09932554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594609880","doi":"","title":"Bungled Police Emergency Calls and the Problems with Unique Duties of Care","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Duty of care; Duty; Law; Legislature; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.006708602276208599,"score_gpt":0.2580926934299996,"score_spread":0.25138409115379096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594609880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13783014,0.009188513,0.013179743,0.31889832,0.0008884511,0.00012278018,0.0000792374,0.00008086427,0.51973194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93336284,0.0017291871,0.0024503828,0.032072965,0.00021629327,0.000046090114,0.00002167679,0.000020601416,0.030079838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897798,0.0022486036,0.0003145318,0.0008316859,0.0027649421,0.0040603857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961862,0.0019772537,0.0003012829,0.00024739996,0.0006317447,0.0006560885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005231789,0.00040873827,0.00041555575,0.0010917209,0.021265656,0.0075044874,0.0021484443,0.01246703,0.0025759926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009578502,0.000595234,0.00059937616,0.0010954322,0.047630645,0.004116856,0.0070195883,0.010765366,0.0003286585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058816654,0.00000927162,0.0008419555,0.00002745359,0.000004103754,0.00068136246,0.013342879,0.00014631117,0.0000765102,0.9721382,0.0068088532,0.0059172935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006067976,0.00007678325,0.012019266,0.0007935714,0.00004870908,0.0029562325,0.052453347,0.0011677506,0.00071054325,0.5434773,0.38603482,0.00020096474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7051947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80532855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7051947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03329135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056007423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5930829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595245854","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016061","title":"The Rule in <i>Saunders v. Vautier</i> and the Czech Trust Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.015752505093699343,"score_gpt":0.2766899404914333,"score_spread":0.26093743539773395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595245854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029811881,0.06446471,0.017749712,0.2638112,0.0059270007,0.000137789,0.00044407713,0.00013461457,0.617519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7861649,0.014543783,0.0068082493,0.12232838,0.0020261304,0.0002320697,0.00016117029,0.00011754553,0.06761786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883255,0.0030840898,0.0011879492,0.0019878978,0.0039984733,0.0014161576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993606,0.0038806493,0.00079367147,0.0005270656,0.00095892866,0.0002336142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009494027,0.00029397706,0.00043312396,0.0013688535,0.004274781,0.010136969,0.0019245278,0.013888521,0.0023854738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019083131,0.0006184184,0.0010813252,0.00183523,0.025500827,0.006927587,0.0032524297,0.011894302,0.00078219007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004225375,0.0000028068685,0.00019028863,0.00005470083,0.0000043161567,0.000054444256,0.00096255844,0.000060579325,0.00005615204,0.98147273,0.014562448,0.00257482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026899426,0.000025531042,0.003023246,0.0010141872,0.000024413874,0.00051332265,0.0022048338,0.00038185134,0.0005464559,0.37419403,0.61794186,0.00010336779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072067484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051363632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072067484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008275745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014457401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14329606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595496218","doi":"","title":"Pure economic loss and non-adopters: comparing liability in Australia, Canada, and the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Liability; Business; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance","score_opus":0.017211305262406378,"score_gpt":0.23331850543293495,"score_spread":0.21610720017052856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595496218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91168165,0.0021614162,0.0006381991,0.0062265387,0.000025302383,0.00010432502,0.00016742757,0.000007772969,0.078987315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956806,0.0009112759,0.00021622953,0.000782513,0.0000052803357,0.00002469135,0.00006365351,0.0000039596875,0.0023117776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98729485,0.0023747238,0.00043116472,0.0005337259,0.0056548957,0.0037107593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97928864,0.008107537,0.0028341284,0.000544575,0.0068153692,0.0024097618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005691941,0.0002029113,0.0006221365,0.004223552,0.0094209565,0.004483387,0.0013106351,0.0013171003,0.002007843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03319998,0.00024881182,0.0005583341,0.0042559667,0.008710726,0.002412307,0.0046914737,0.0028728012,0.00008314803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006487128,0.0005032275,0.40991727,0.00037569492,0.00032756105,0.0030829317,0.079520896,0.0040603,0.0010510741,0.4142022,0.009692683,0.076617405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014859892,0.00030553452,0.8053069,0.0008997432,0.0005605616,0.0009310734,0.10165978,0.0069444766,0.0013004475,0.04303349,0.038669325,0.00024016903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96532047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05219494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05219494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06923153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37870258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596288791","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttx019","title":"When the music stops: the UKSC judgment in Akers, applying the bona fide purchaser rule and offshore trusts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Adidas (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Supreme court; Equity (law); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.049192847927912016,"score_gpt":0.3161396334232771,"score_spread":0.2669467854953651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596288791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22122529,0.0047359113,0.0029928212,0.2479606,0.0021271438,0.00007719379,0.00013891264,0.00007747574,0.52066475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87028706,0.00081878586,0.0007631822,0.058673512,0.0005209937,0.000037838505,0.000020987398,0.000038843657,0.068838835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916242,0.0026106844,0.0005352862,0.000834561,0.002171138,0.0022241275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958354,0.0025604155,0.00035890244,0.00024726405,0.00063537096,0.00036271292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045269746,0.00029803262,0.00040138155,0.0007440421,0.0128875235,0.009665199,0.0011961791,0.015405454,0.004971988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016360996,0.0005352247,0.0006096927,0.0008358151,0.009840824,0.005550317,0.004198068,0.009932123,0.0011734779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006758872,0.000027128426,0.0027614948,0.000056599194,0.000012608132,0.005539928,0.030775208,0.00027193714,0.00062494416,0.86834663,0.082314774,0.009201191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007874613,0.00017650133,0.0066914614,0.001088303,0.00011285113,0.0037918282,0.06670954,0.0013681168,0.003187914,0.14401732,0.77249426,0.0002830737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09890985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16140905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09890985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008378607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065382463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19666827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596415548","doi":"10.1002/iir.1271","title":"Jersey Insolvency and Asset TrackingA.Dessain and M.Wilkins (5th Ed) (2016, Key Haven Publications, Oxford), cviii and 583 Pages, £125, ISBN 978‐1‐901614‐67‐1","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Key (lock); Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.06006918545934287,"score_gpt":0.3766426012085724,"score_spread":0.31657341574922954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596415548","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029688978,0.9442678,0.0007522677,0.015438903,0.0029472339,0.000009553286,0.00024879206,0.00005832975,0.035980206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009146302,0.9067985,0.0010111986,0.0047372277,0.0021612442,0.000029925288,0.0004954767,0.000063002386,0.07555705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998784,0.00020784426,0.000100015546,0.00018653742,0.00060360535,0.00011794954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988739,0.00047241198,0.00022150564,0.00005654039,0.00029866083,0.00007705201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018789656,0.0009980316,0.00091123703,0.0023347093,0.0010628485,0.0050855377,0.0011649694,0.0029346629,0.032456975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039651394,0.0007932716,0.00037195804,0.0035021736,0.0017754879,0.005480267,0.0020788785,0.002568017,0.0103783915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021507152,0.000025122717,0.00038879484,0.0008288928,0.000015110483,0.00007680004,0.00019430455,0.00021841229,0.000072684874,0.03385735,0.73978716,0.22451392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036631334,0.000009034407,0.0009970466,0.0015156582,0.000009345106,0.0001734689,0.000111042114,0.00007212257,0.00005016749,0.0069278292,0.99012077,0.000009919432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029969651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06663663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032456975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00425514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005886711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10857934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597833929","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4370","title":"SCORCHED EARTH: THE USE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS TO STIFLE COMPETITION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Covenant; Humanities; Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Political science; Business; Welfare economics; Economics; Art; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.20526493107737948,"score_gpt":0.393474131765862,"score_spread":0.18820920068848251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597833929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17962825,0.0012263183,0.023122301,0.013058985,0.0002510119,0.00016581226,0.00006206821,0.00020714143,0.78227806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96607333,0.00032050503,0.00232296,0.0028596546,0.00003323535,0.000053581487,0.000026977172,0.00006011106,0.028249655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800019,0.007322333,0.00072720245,0.0016828552,0.00612987,0.0041357568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850712,0.008182788,0.0012455689,0.0023273109,0.0021122554,0.0010609055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012107964,0.00042126235,0.00047761205,0.0019745193,0.018912567,0.013504246,0.0029208795,0.005899589,0.0064329742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02834331,0.0005289743,0.000476858,0.0024156212,0.046397544,0.0072071366,0.009408446,0.007552854,0.00066488626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016532393,0.000026704167,0.0028129015,0.000037523114,0.000009561119,0.0004576891,0.03609714,0.000330213,0.0005993672,0.9416611,0.0058014025,0.012149909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057054403,0.00023098795,0.02288674,0.0014860415,0.0001282251,0.0010832369,0.16948754,0.004192178,0.003322495,0.23691668,0.55988944,0.00031936218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30927756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4620224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30927756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015791629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6149547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599707691","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1088","title":"Misfeasance, Nonfeasance, and the Self-Interested Attorney","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power of attorney; Fiduciary; Estate; Law; Duty; Duty of care; Liability; Estate planning; Compensation (psychology); Business; Political science; Psychology; Health care","score_opus":0.01309679819789186,"score_gpt":0.28676134777251344,"score_spread":0.2736645495746216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599707691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12436665,0.023218678,0.036755476,0.21297158,0.0014326177,0.00025930148,0.000117824704,0.00008929928,0.6007886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301066,0.002101361,0.0065072365,0.02092609,0.00090656854,0.00023027511,0.000020412326,0.000031883435,0.039169673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777508,0.009664683,0.0018139927,0.0031129844,0.005302869,0.002354746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95135176,0.034319356,0.003735905,0.0046853586,0.0042383745,0.0016692482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024408512,0.00050723413,0.0011029757,0.0018129142,0.007821729,0.010923553,0.002396805,0.020467283,0.0030818835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053530388,0.0007122057,0.00082097156,0.0009091894,0.04622521,0.01195138,0.0064874333,0.010593169,0.00066357054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012892278,0.000025762201,0.00090013555,0.000020350639,0.0000070988826,0.00027300647,0.0013017027,0.00017089194,0.00005972363,0.9910156,0.002322377,0.0038903938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030203035,0.00009188757,0.0016893137,0.00030025854,0.000030238916,0.00097565015,0.0019069685,0.0010126756,0.00042548595,0.94548887,0.0479903,0.000058148406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067229387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060952674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024408512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050276243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009137649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12908608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602339526","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.4094","title":"Saisir les enjeux de la maternité de substitution sous le prisme de la théorie générale du contrat : quelles perspectives en France et au Québec ?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011040066406632834,"score_gpt":0.3162444392463499,"score_spread":0.305204372839717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602339526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2749769,0.024680832,0.03958899,0.2600143,0.0004834252,0.00006204284,0.00019670259,0.000060801456,0.39993593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691957,0.0036370372,0.0031423264,0.005202291,0.00008490696,0.000030763906,0.000031808333,0.00003158236,0.018643556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937645,0.0034674192,0.00010699058,0.0005112361,0.0013198396,0.0008300469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928275,0.0036793444,0.0009040041,0.0005008905,0.0016176961,0.0004705823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074935216,0.00038923632,0.0005842881,0.0012669486,0.0063297376,0.0077565494,0.0017944947,0.0035420442,0.0058922083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009126211,0.0002692665,0.0004800139,0.001512216,0.02780596,0.0044154283,0.002662938,0.0038495115,0.00038990518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017006518,0.000010708092,0.004140748,0.00006386991,0.000013847539,0.0001699931,0.03089983,0.00046794448,0.0001618811,0.9515974,0.0020572993,0.010399387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027550457,0.00007024644,0.025588995,0.0013519935,0.00008838109,0.00062087754,0.09095276,0.003417757,0.0010052328,0.5226654,0.35407138,0.00013941595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51167315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57848394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48832685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030810272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03241529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602648738","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016064","title":"Position of a Trustee: The Capacity to Be a Trustee and a Trustees Duty of Care","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Czech; Duty of care; Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Law; Business; Political science; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02538594827369817,"score_gpt":0.28842246814378125,"score_spread":0.2630365198700831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602648738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103051595,0.038169175,0.01503448,0.15461303,0.0018655509,0.00016020324,0.00025278988,0.000048839196,0.68680435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673803,0.0049170996,0.0011779135,0.008465172,0.0003378572,0.00004382051,0.000051454346,0.000015028102,0.017611481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97467065,0.008960369,0.0018234953,0.0021352249,0.0076350584,0.0047752275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824702,0.0070238817,0.0026514842,0.0012491508,0.0035295668,0.0030757843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010907743,0.00024562882,0.0004326989,0.0015175532,0.004746686,0.011808012,0.0014365284,0.005545274,0.0043097045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022400154,0.0003485725,0.000536676,0.0013670967,0.026957627,0.0074057197,0.0072879903,0.0050624353,0.0007807193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023224527,0.000026296015,0.0023796048,0.0001843805,0.000014183742,0.00040919357,0.01248364,0.00012419374,0.00025710603,0.9595303,0.009318596,0.0152493445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047102214,0.00014159796,0.02663341,0.00319616,0.000086171385,0.00243947,0.04393679,0.0006744337,0.000585522,0.22735023,0.6947317,0.00017739001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086875945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08220925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086875945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016420914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026149066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17274052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603622038","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016060","title":"Trust as a Legislative Challenge: Bipolar Relation vs Quasi-Corporate Status? Basic Trust Models in Legal Practice, Theory, and Legislation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Mandate; Legislature; Express trust; German; Transparency (behavior); Law; Trust law; Legal practice; Political science; Law and economics; Civil code; Business; Legislation; Simple (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03107136426497374,"score_gpt":0.30130106687366287,"score_spread":0.2702297026086891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603622038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06126575,0.08023265,0.06242785,0.26977393,0.0022140655,0.00009312369,0.00015199697,0.00008878546,0.5237519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96084917,0.016704116,0.0031013982,0.006820956,0.0009954987,0.000083205785,0.000045211247,0.000032307784,0.011368205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929696,0.0035997813,0.0003302803,0.0006974383,0.0015480998,0.0008548816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938759,0.003518748,0.0008110203,0.0005832353,0.0007403823,0.0004707009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006851716,0.00030113786,0.000513823,0.0017220688,0.0026888356,0.010059665,0.0013223233,0.005101108,0.0027686579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009732426,0.00028775664,0.0005970092,0.002256492,0.03837092,0.016157776,0.0032285661,0.0054911077,0.00054700905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013101456,0.0000022907097,0.000047201647,0.00001808897,8.942984e-7,0.000012538924,0.00052669377,0.000052833097,0.000010879667,0.99693847,0.00069803704,0.0016907156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070527853,0.000015130074,0.0005518019,0.00033713557,0.000005221847,0.00010354449,0.0017892965,0.00065623125,0.000057132,0.9454991,0.05096459,0.000013677176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008860067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075841397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010059665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089001255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00635222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064575195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604136451","doi":"10.1177/0022018317694715","title":"Unlawful and Dangerous","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Law; Criminal law; English law; Constructive; Criminal code; Political science; Order (exchange); Common law; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.061549430636889876,"score_gpt":0.37031241595851433,"score_spread":0.30876298532162444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604136451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11525036,0.0044018324,0.006324207,0.023936238,0.00074916397,0.00011650648,0.00010252169,0.00003587808,0.84908336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96064276,0.0016977562,0.0013481006,0.006494066,0.00021922031,0.000065178974,0.000037501955,0.000021067046,0.02947453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99036026,0.0029778997,0.0005453613,0.00080389343,0.0037997216,0.0015128475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942662,0.001759366,0.001059196,0.00073762645,0.0012346888,0.0009429807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032164278,0.0003406597,0.00044354456,0.0017471345,0.005455447,0.006307251,0.00073723675,0.002728411,0.004163088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011192914,0.0003036602,0.0002648058,0.0010317311,0.04000236,0.004452827,0.005703495,0.003668411,0.0006239179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008241815,0.000024531122,0.0017320045,0.000037352453,0.000005729971,0.00029472416,0.026175892,0.00005275126,0.00023449241,0.95832086,0.0036588516,0.009454462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016633683,0.00007723428,0.015365319,0.00094042893,0.00003579817,0.0016551336,0.05568771,0.00041716758,0.000595346,0.50657,0.4185694,0.000069923706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03197753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044394206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03197753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003883224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068948045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06358284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607808881","doi":"","title":"On The Sufficient Conditions for Trust: A Criticism of Katherine Hawley's Commitment-Based Account of Trust","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07349767316554584,"score_gpt":0.3609509046014911,"score_spread":0.28745323143594526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607808881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021545982,0.0040526176,0.14963895,0.39065474,0.002244858,0.00022400024,0.00055577967,0.00015140507,0.43093163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9150423,0.0019000468,0.022405587,0.036365595,0.0027482305,0.000796886,0.00010356382,0.00016689721,0.020470843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98841965,0.004858291,0.0008404025,0.001998656,0.0028486224,0.0010343626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95954126,0.027524564,0.0025359187,0.004423132,0.004834871,0.0011402947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019095194,0.00069266977,0.0020877884,0.0020864666,0.005215131,0.0069140233,0.0035933056,0.014202771,0.012148567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058521353,0.00096282555,0.0014980108,0.001977263,0.044359498,0.020639028,0.0056211688,0.019528726,0.0023268203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061717546,0.000004556512,0.00003469701,0.000016024122,0.000004300439,0.000014915031,0.0002109746,0.000084638115,0.000009491951,0.99592185,0.0029707546,0.0007215681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013837979,0.0000026942494,0.000044940058,0.000029603625,0.0000037689406,0.000021954675,0.00008245634,0.00027657807,0.000027076141,0.9947359,0.004755334,0.000005832469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061098537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004305093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019095194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007057052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067497706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10098624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26087353","doi":"10.29173/alr26","title":"From Right to Wrong: Grounding a \"Right\" to Privacy in the \"Wrongs\" of Tort","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Tort; Right to privacy; Privacy laws of the United States; Law; The Right to Privacy; Expectation of privacy; Work (physics); Internet privacy; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Information privacy; Liability; Engineering","score_opus":0.06632087572559733,"score_gpt":0.37209857996107476,"score_spread":0.30577770423547745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26087353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018814554,0.07885216,0.05572745,0.51261437,0.0023942115,0.00008426326,0.00010998116,0.000065796434,0.3313373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8528914,0.041398857,0.009356116,0.076114446,0.0029147745,0.00018613815,0.00009591883,0.00006547749,0.016976995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9682967,0.018251032,0.0012323789,0.0020581177,0.008016757,0.0021451407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586792,0.03224478,0.0024313738,0.002784251,0.0030593888,0.0008010518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023978768,0.0005731595,0.0013652296,0.0042413576,0.0073282537,0.012218171,0.0025399898,0.017761113,0.003799784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038979385,0.0007465834,0.0011510706,0.0028206927,0.07764615,0.02437743,0.0071398914,0.018108146,0.00059210527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022616227,0.000004186777,0.00006300884,0.000027511302,0.0000024882881,0.000021719812,0.00031331746,0.000116205185,0.000007931419,0.99608237,0.0014810454,0.0018779624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059282092,0.0000055538894,0.00011120743,0.00029415358,0.000005818628,0.000034799712,0.00038838477,0.000151666,0.00003809991,0.975224,0.023733692,0.000006680372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016401133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011485958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023978768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010475011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017685695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12681335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609703429","doi":"10.29173/alr494","title":"The Crown's Duty to Consult Aboriginal People","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Certainty; Treaty; Law; Legal certainty; Subject (documents); Crown (dentistry); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016029531343375956,"score_gpt":0.3516439561028977,"score_spread":0.33561442475952175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609703429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025025098,0.04942862,0.0025382424,0.1852605,0.0014600948,0.00012242282,0.00015323005,0.00007196776,0.73593974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5967588,0.024478536,0.0038693072,0.089899726,0.0010145245,0.00007213567,0.00013270337,0.00004270287,0.28373164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878499,0.0020302897,0.00045516813,0.00069248123,0.007325414,0.001646691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125916,0.0036691348,0.0006040753,0.0004667812,0.0031315025,0.0008692995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007179679,0.0002206316,0.0005588231,0.0012185606,0.0069726417,0.007934713,0.0015640015,0.009542127,0.004011577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01946966,0.00043198344,0.00031520633,0.001257556,0.007701158,0.0020060905,0.0021940542,0.004960442,0.0007808324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019573328,0.000024026334,0.0017555846,0.00028720335,0.00002410524,0.0007069067,0.009691593,0.00034246946,0.0006509881,0.79079676,0.15004084,0.04566002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017493725,0.00003472191,0.008156516,0.0007404371,0.000042145544,0.00043339212,0.0037251194,0.00024327701,0.00035300452,0.07139664,0.9148025,0.000054738088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5591056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6384595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44089442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01353628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05800072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8869819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609705142","doi":"","title":"The Stolen Generation: A Breach of Fiduciary Duties? Canadian v Australian Approaches to Fiduciary Duties","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Law; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.25068757749584153,"score_gpt":0.2995491766440529,"score_spread":0.048861599148211365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609705142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15217012,0.022865009,0.0036756806,0.30548364,0.0009844063,0.00014109633,0.00015017593,0.000046195084,0.51448363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89019626,0.007672028,0.0021146855,0.04230081,0.00032064316,0.000045881436,0.000026276004,0.000023048271,0.057300273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98622966,0.0022067458,0.00030064263,0.0007021064,0.0060283868,0.0045324736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489945,0.0019192919,0.00035322498,0.0002408528,0.0020002667,0.0005870575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064830706,0.00058255234,0.0005502989,0.0022883727,0.023833942,0.009468574,0.004388724,0.009694384,0.002679521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016779881,0.0004612219,0.00062875554,0.0022132157,0.021690138,0.0045730784,0.0042485003,0.01120228,0.00017712491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027332682,0.000030224877,0.0024359603,0.000113149166,0.00001786945,0.00118584,0.041142315,0.00051304314,0.00033694354,0.91156507,0.022267934,0.020364337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048486196,0.0001134917,0.025960747,0.0019382932,0.00021823232,0.001731619,0.08430712,0.0029126266,0.0015585173,0.23943114,0.64139766,0.0003820943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96460396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9846688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10103255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10103255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.103330195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7330459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609828263","doi":"10.18769/ijasos.309488","title":"RECOVERING NON-PECUNIARY LOSSES IN BREACH OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT UNDER MALAYSIAN LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Atomic Energy of Canada Limited","keywords":"Dismissal; Employment contract; Reputation; Plaintiff; Embarrassment; Statutory law; Labour law; Prerogative; Law; Pleading; Unfair dismissal; Business; Political science; Work (physics); Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04087479915470227,"score_gpt":0.43145253760068103,"score_spread":0.39057773844597876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609828263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48818716,0.005644023,0.008573382,0.016951261,0.0004504481,0.00038082624,0.00018296648,0.000084164414,0.47954577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94324034,0.0016252887,0.0012733215,0.0018986327,0.00014296648,0.000065693406,0.000045603763,0.000015868949,0.05169231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99329776,0.0010710543,0.0004461145,0.0005380768,0.002553427,0.0020936113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966905,0.0010083606,0.0008746722,0.00043511356,0.0006494943,0.00034185982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039737266,0.00033077272,0.00028256644,0.0012549758,0.0039787027,0.0064468957,0.0015075074,0.0050173947,0.007928297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008804141,0.00033580972,0.0004871552,0.00071999256,0.004646098,0.0034162204,0.0038912243,0.004351093,0.0012563445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011986943,0.0003287749,0.039855395,0.00030036562,0.000042728785,0.013331809,0.01413008,0.0034279623,0.0021734664,0.82992756,0.018544994,0.07781704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007838008,0.00080186746,0.10557953,0.005624541,0.00017083038,0.022226948,0.041368503,0.022975149,0.0055369083,0.31453112,0.48069543,0.00041089416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020593233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021853836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020593233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004821519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008939648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040946722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610808217","doi":"","title":"Investor Loss from Securities Non-disclosure: A Statutory Presumption of Causation on the Canadian Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Causation; Statutory law; Project commissioning; Legislation; Business; Law; Publishing; Order (exchange); Statutory interpretation; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03991898861520887,"score_gpt":0.24410372532078797,"score_spread":0.2041847367055791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610808217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035516847,0.0030691705,0.028596716,0.22741379,0.0008802143,0.00024676524,0.00070464413,0.00013386461,0.703438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88804436,0.0030830298,0.0064345263,0.034915846,0.0005157854,0.00011523532,0.00016428129,0.00004120949,0.06668579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896506,0.0012893787,0.0003194643,0.00093612703,0.004885324,0.0029190416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99102205,0.0036061602,0.00087174046,0.00070634886,0.0032089045,0.0005848298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086124325,0.00069161935,0.0011380921,0.0023688856,0.0076822652,0.0087560965,0.0040069786,0.008814045,0.010566739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023677321,0.0006200272,0.0017231021,0.0017454703,0.012988132,0.005827259,0.00346804,0.012416134,0.0007696174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007650937,0.000008207983,0.0005418169,0.000013979838,0.0000071025097,0.00010141245,0.00019280578,0.00048685403,0.000039254675,0.99293375,0.00389091,0.0017763041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009842629,0.000052501124,0.0053898604,0.00041342835,0.00012759921,0.00041962124,0.0010557082,0.012845904,0.0005307303,0.8952301,0.08369399,0.0001420925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8464089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8579833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1535911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042360615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078041255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3089912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612471374","doi":"","title":"Lesser Expectations by Vic Parsons","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Island writer","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.04910826830668639,"score_gpt":0.3474716399617904,"score_spread":0.298363371655104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612471374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044676317,0.0050086235,0.00029812416,0.79390347,0.014986844,0.000011078314,0.000030994375,0.000056131863,0.18123706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0580056,0.002020724,0.000256096,0.29213482,0.0061602187,0.00002766416,0.000023080924,0.0001921072,0.6411797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996968,0.0012563306,0.00010619176,0.00050558936,0.0008517329,0.0003120995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898789,0.005257447,0.0003409042,0.00042243826,0.002308183,0.0017921986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035134542,0.00035499092,0.00044367966,0.0006966584,0.011911194,0.008686306,0.0009532029,0.007794832,0.039877225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015709622,0.0003613149,0.00022389404,0.0004750979,0.004303926,0.0047187363,0.002496729,0.01633914,0.007232079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001527077,0.000016334876,0.00032988752,0.000032527878,0.0000026352945,0.000081547434,0.0038196852,0.000032335283,0.000072522875,0.06559827,0.92080325,0.009195641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074635172,0.000011954417,0.0006504977,0.00012830741,0.0000038424096,0.00010583157,0.0072929515,0.00007253318,0.00009766002,0.010537988,0.9810765,0.000014443135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02053502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052146535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039877225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035140337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048157615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13340265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613895645","doi":"","title":"L'eau, chose commune : un statut juridique à confirmer","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Chose; Commission; Public administration","score_opus":0.030500846700034837,"score_gpt":0.3044705962452377,"score_spread":0.27396974954520287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613895645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024824472,0.015023774,0.003591304,0.3987441,0.016871888,0.0004132194,0.002498738,0.00040504424,0.5376274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19909911,0.0043550087,0.00244957,0.108632185,0.005049081,0.00044834855,0.0007789195,0.00027446495,0.6789133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893246,0.0010289362,0.0004631622,0.0011995912,0.005224473,0.002759257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98343176,0.006245441,0.0006301352,0.00073743373,0.0077654156,0.0011898729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009265124,0.00055311405,0.0012345744,0.0020904555,0.023780672,0.011489369,0.0031824429,0.014728516,0.038328666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031647995,0.0007666902,0.00068583054,0.0025031797,0.005525252,0.0051428354,0.0037475666,0.014100284,0.0075087324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008464728,0.000052666775,0.0030543508,0.00019225942,0.000017566419,0.0010508873,0.004401095,0.00010027661,0.00046412557,0.3076286,0.66347736,0.019476289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022793807,0.00001406795,0.002953603,0.00019379391,0.000013028457,0.00012023235,0.0018929025,0.0001389852,0.00027445497,0.0042162053,0.9901086,0.00005139854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68614745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72547126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31385255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024629766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05078251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6314018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614143649","doi":"","title":"Compromised Jurisprudence: Native Title Cases since Mabo","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian aboriginal studies/Australian Aboriginal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Commonwealth; Law; High Court; Publishing; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07565362637497428,"score_gpt":0.44843863272153195,"score_spread":0.37278500634655765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614143649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116026394,0.16361673,0.0016972369,0.18180987,0.003298672,0.000056431225,0.000065949556,0.000041479303,0.53338724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858638,0.016315442,0.0006426752,0.031356044,0.0015166051,0.00006427283,0.000041166826,0.000041525447,0.091384314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917733,0.0028896409,0.00030725822,0.0009630616,0.002453864,0.0016129346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99302304,0.0044616917,0.00072388817,0.00038978242,0.0007565049,0.00064507604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008070843,0.00023292722,0.0006936907,0.0009899546,0.013599513,0.013324352,0.0018228726,0.009293719,0.0025228157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018651614,0.0006457849,0.00038802263,0.0017765429,0.023033153,0.008191613,0.008715161,0.0108099915,0.00045577664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004750296,0.000034120796,0.0015319621,0.0001569371,0.0000128893835,0.0021653986,0.11276359,0.00014502907,0.00042680392,0.7965271,0.06593782,0.020250862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026343974,0.00007306579,0.011307341,0.0014618831,0.000030262567,0.001863484,0.048390124,0.00030912473,0.00042103036,0.09031178,0.8457259,0.00007954228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056416772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06694671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056416772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013419036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077324244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112176776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615660506","doi":"","title":"2007. 04. 044. Макиннес М. Канадские критерии неосновательного обогащения. McInnes M. The test of unjust enrichment in Canada // law Quart. Rev. - L. , 2007. - Vol. 123, n 1. - P. 34-39","year":2007,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия 4: государство и право. Реферативный журнал","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.01612773206139259,"score_gpt":0.27534948349857763,"score_spread":0.25922175143718507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615660506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052378705,0.005903098,0.0005734195,0.014248917,0.002231693,0.00007603666,0.009595939,0.0011733533,0.96567374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031103676,0.002586448,0.00023862404,0.0015672266,0.00041680422,0.000059962535,0.0023225301,0.00034335523,0.9893547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946517,0.00004324426,0.000034421642,0.00007197578,0.00025036154,0.00013484717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871767,0.00021117336,0.0000894415,0.00010609506,0.0006028186,0.00027294367],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000871293,0.0008631965,0.0007079975,0.0018168472,0.002197068,0.006615374,0.0015917327,0.006586174,0.84004676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022711265,0.000620336,0.0005406028,0.002482789,0.0009417263,0.0032429905,0.001964394,0.0029224493,0.763424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006805579,0.000031583397,0.0002095025,0.000116945135,0.000003834253,0.00006347728,0.0000915082,0.000019994292,0.00012872435,0.011060008,0.9287297,0.059476692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028101076,0.000019775593,0.0021805807,0.00033521073,0.000007172642,0.00015085434,0.00020222031,0.000061754276,0.00014222591,0.0037353882,0.99312145,0.000015213893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025748292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039927177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023543527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002946597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22815382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617007261","doi":"","title":"Lex Punit Mendacium: punitive damages and Bhasin v Hrynew","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Damages; Duty; Law; Political science; Tort; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.1942475082778507,"score_gpt":0.3992266789309864,"score_spread":0.2049791706531357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617007261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03341407,0.0038323172,0.00068006193,0.05762665,0.00076880533,0.0000709158,0.00028794588,0.000038527283,0.9032806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50406116,0.003605201,0.0008761081,0.04556856,0.00044991,0.00009133357,0.00024389391,0.00004535055,0.44505858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981914,0.00017559413,0.00005261613,0.00021577324,0.0007661383,0.0005985687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932945,0.00026938668,0.00008947334,0.000037583148,0.00017588305,0.000098362965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009605185,0.0002514928,0.00024523804,0.00064696127,0.007071261,0.0052072904,0.0014322202,0.006073845,0.016120698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026121929,0.00027598656,0.0002469664,0.0007132775,0.0046619927,0.0019271905,0.0021148508,0.005409719,0.0012783105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026663141,0.000029495734,0.0016711088,0.000061508,0.000006933303,0.0010226283,0.0034285751,0.00015946705,0.0004908438,0.91092044,0.069618896,0.012563491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005314066,0.00006336034,0.016636424,0.0004590486,0.00003720963,0.0011257847,0.0065530906,0.000830534,0.0013228097,0.12459145,0.8482385,0.00008869739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69668776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8186499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69668776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019358495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020058045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.610197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618850900","doi":"","title":"The Explosive Global Growth of Personal Insolvency and the Concomitant Birth of the Study of Comparative Consumer Bankruptcy: Consumer Bankruptcy in Global Perspective, by Johanna Niemi-Kiesilainen, Lain Ramsay & William C. Whitford (eds.); Comparative Consumer Insolvency Regimes: A Canadian Perspective, by Jacob S. Ziegel","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Business; Law and economics; Art; Finance","score_opus":0.022665803827679055,"score_gpt":0.306952309928573,"score_spread":0.2842865061008939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618850900","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022410203,0.6219085,0.0026744478,0.11259647,0.0010013147,0.000012578545,0.0001685747,0.00003686699,0.23919107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40420806,0.54769355,0.003180015,0.012489277,0.003403045,0.00003665129,0.00015380171,0.00007437436,0.028761245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917656,0.00026943182,0.000022676892,0.00012373035,0.0002759151,0.00013180729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778605,0.0012818901,0.00024950533,0.00012921228,0.00029267964,0.00026060676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015490111,0.00055192126,0.00060874363,0.0034734227,0.0026861452,0.009960089,0.00056604453,0.003388809,0.006437639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001944957,0.0002757338,0.00039573511,0.009893919,0.016665377,0.0071498738,0.00263149,0.0034834906,0.0004766015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022019896,0.000019388062,0.0025957276,0.0002479583,0.000022895782,0.00015164416,0.010778417,0.0005667928,0.00017468056,0.86459476,0.0624473,0.058378525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000818719,0.000027483411,0.01734387,0.00096534385,0.000029562601,0.00046774786,0.0151212355,0.0005835679,0.00021672326,0.30881,0.65639323,0.00003306544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06021212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1609329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93978786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008665305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047346563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11972332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619024050","doi":"","title":"Positive prescription of landownership in Scots law : the requirement for the written deed, with particular reference to the concepts of ex facie validity and hability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ERA","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Johannesburg; Dalhousie University; University of Glasgow; University of St Andrews","keywords":"Deed; Prima facie; Law; Medical prescription; Collation; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0993304278905761,"score_gpt":0.3791858712142953,"score_spread":0.2798554433237192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619024050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2562162,0.002950892,0.022159211,0.011655873,0.00044177333,0.00010005909,0.00017172845,0.00008004445,0.70622426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748678,0.00048399816,0.001800339,0.0011101462,0.00008830609,0.000035557077,0.00003953385,0.000012015017,0.021562224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765587,0.0006868414,0.00017431477,0.00028976824,0.00083816925,0.00035493044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812,0.00070124544,0.0002909983,0.00026544483,0.00050381466,0.00011846287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019079963,0.00014819625,0.00024959352,0.0005814374,0.0019528526,0.0040494273,0.0007018743,0.0012479881,0.0027246536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003846534,0.0002773757,0.00025080628,0.0004699227,0.014687326,0.0024552213,0.002330425,0.0023812072,0.00045986488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011720881,0.0000115700195,0.0013089861,0.000045229004,0.000002703075,0.0002539946,0.0036185945,0.00032926945,0.000709155,0.9870336,0.001236399,0.0054387706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006365528,0.00027737327,0.032231573,0.0008173683,0.000025175921,0.0013000893,0.008646544,0.00418771,0.003372331,0.6653399,0.28361878,0.00011949488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018879643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024722816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018879643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039486783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043130554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03753954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622946236","doi":"","title":"Samuel Richardson and the Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and literature; Philosophy; Legal fiction; Literature; Poetry; History; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.01594819290875621,"score_gpt":0.31665045003188397,"score_spread":0.30070225712312776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622946236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0135820275,0.040506475,0.0029745616,0.2951669,0.0036431332,0.0000329655,0.00005571097,0.000135802,0.6439025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5518794,0.030650318,0.0042821663,0.07933441,0.0040623043,0.00009700481,0.00005524475,0.00015535408,0.32948384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976319,0.0011032004,0.00007061811,0.0004157009,0.00049365615,0.0002848093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979658,0.0011720737,0.00020429135,0.00017634814,0.00027594133,0.00020566834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023172142,0.00032442287,0.0002751571,0.0013297361,0.0076231323,0.0064002173,0.00084897823,0.0044532497,0.006462161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006001394,0.00032342816,0.00027954468,0.0008237283,0.01875989,0.004772538,0.0025533414,0.004902404,0.001888271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062834974,0.000008231853,0.0001249671,0.000031273074,0.0000020531231,0.00021042624,0.004054568,0.00008937318,0.00005523093,0.9091352,0.07791693,0.008365438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002763549,0.0000130812805,0.0001352529,0.00013889665,0.0000021045096,0.0004007545,0.00342302,0.00009451969,0.0001258638,0.111536264,0.88411623,0.000011338041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066419467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008930384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076231323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052152644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004219679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037839532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623631935","doi":"","title":"The BCE Blunder: An Argument in Favour of Shareholder Wealth Maximization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Shareholder; Maximization; Financial economics; Economics; Positive economics; Business; Microeconomics; Management; Medicine; Corporate governance; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.020794162243000694,"score_gpt":0.3033554218758259,"score_spread":0.28256125963282525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623631935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022195052,0.004683514,0.072803274,0.18850099,0.00061304023,0.00012521852,0.0002093383,0.000084516054,0.71078503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8444138,0.0024441783,0.0153418435,0.037460823,0.0011151762,0.0002646839,0.00006234723,0.000108394364,0.09878879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481106,0.0014894907,0.000113442824,0.0010566212,0.0017119827,0.0008173143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547285,0.0024771416,0.00041752984,0.000505374,0.0007844039,0.0003426921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007425054,0.0007140927,0.0009678884,0.0012751276,0.0040156604,0.0052834866,0.002188821,0.0075142183,0.008865847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016029418,0.0005036079,0.0008953788,0.0010728325,0.024038121,0.0077392617,0.00437515,0.010549712,0.0012257268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048325487,0.0000028282682,0.00006880483,0.0000065957993,0.0000022093286,0.000014310151,0.000086040745,0.00009657192,0.000017883645,0.9961086,0.0023044734,0.0012867565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024876113,0.0000095698015,0.00032509316,0.000055969922,0.000008600547,0.000043300308,0.00006533625,0.001094904,0.00014178923,0.9729433,0.025279745,0.0000075921853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03916662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039858386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03916662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011622379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008100402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084326684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624364408","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5945","title":"Search for Principle - The Government's Liability in Negligence for the Careless Exercise of its Statutory Powers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Project commissioning; Liability; Government (linguistics); Law; Publishing; Business; Strict liability; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02710318604166993,"score_gpt":0.3033416156082833,"score_spread":0.2762384295666134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624364408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03826091,0.010312541,0.07634649,0.29240417,0.0011457767,0.00031289592,0.00022157964,0.00012072713,0.580875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89647657,0.0032935583,0.037954506,0.032163274,0.0011823714,0.00032082415,0.00007101227,0.000044743334,0.028493103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99020547,0.0034370313,0.00054152356,0.0012344765,0.003708427,0.00087300723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897424,0.006262132,0.00087928347,0.0009831312,0.0017580613,0.0003750248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016652292,0.00035279107,0.0009326959,0.0018687182,0.00482003,0.0058016847,0.0020532238,0.008967804,0.0026939858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019504758,0.0005751613,0.0012084299,0.00096028147,0.035209153,0.0069406694,0.0034921698,0.012624789,0.00077681243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019977992,0.000008465424,0.00007669424,0.000017662956,0.0000027395965,0.00003398146,0.00040216098,0.000109372704,0.000052585707,0.9963174,0.0017540443,0.0012229336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014723012,0.000015157204,0.00028767504,0.00011252245,0.000006455938,0.00010033909,0.00031078103,0.00042407837,0.00012274954,0.97598755,0.022607146,0.000010884244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012833725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013758565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016652292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009758228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019397605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08806676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625723308","doi":"","title":"Defining the Scope of Fiduciary Liability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Liability; Political science; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.014639407963039953,"score_gpt":0.3302644139803511,"score_spread":0.31562500601731114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625723308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06610428,0.013774332,0.12664077,0.030320313,0.0003834294,0.0001941377,0.000296574,0.000087670946,0.7621985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969232,0.0025007657,0.01632997,0.0034768712,0.00043961641,0.00022607943,0.00006693535,0.000039911858,0.0076878075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98610663,0.004126987,0.00080348033,0.0019559655,0.0050444896,0.0019624922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824242,0.010119164,0.0012664616,0.0016432756,0.003492187,0.0010545853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015484824,0.00066551106,0.0010445039,0.004133642,0.0048926715,0.011177747,0.0028000746,0.008006383,0.0021176483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028449235,0.0007835545,0.00089222536,0.0019316247,0.03762171,0.0098426,0.00669908,0.0071137925,0.00055436074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002179023,0.0000038995086,0.00018745376,0.000009873772,0.0000022856489,0.000021591037,0.000425974,0.00023328263,0.00007011299,0.997174,0.0003185805,0.0015506028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006186135,0.000011546767,0.00060849165,0.00019229112,0.0000066402176,0.00006846014,0.00048419033,0.00057777,0.00015316506,0.9855198,0.012355841,0.000015597348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017987305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014537335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017987305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00816277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01174882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08189255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626293412","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Missing the Forest for the Trees in Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Causation; Law; Political science; Charter; Section (typography); Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04576770244883175,"score_gpt":0.28317856793729074,"score_spread":0.237410865488459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626293412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08553623,0.0063578673,0.0015285512,0.45148513,0.004384626,0.00044006994,0.0012874516,0.00019609634,0.44878408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28132755,0.0022455598,0.0009118857,0.38193458,0.0006831959,0.00018832259,0.00030113387,0.00009091812,0.33231685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936666,0.00044394672,0.0001531371,0.00063359126,0.0019153622,0.0031872722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725765,0.0010078568,0.00012138537,0.00009563241,0.00090356887,0.00061386445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022192365,0.0005346628,0.00052388,0.0010294679,0.030861216,0.005520271,0.0030847874,0.025611367,0.0135204345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005525281,0.0009029214,0.0007912578,0.0015025303,0.0051420596,0.0017440493,0.001965996,0.013186227,0.0010674217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000811143,0.00010724409,0.0078077973,0.00009862137,0.000027495085,0.00549338,0.009648973,0.00045887879,0.0007579672,0.1948546,0.76857424,0.012089766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007189434,0.000061965795,0.018796315,0.00034227115,0.0000921945,0.0011893658,0.011732769,0.0009580103,0.0009668856,0.009633563,0.9559234,0.00023139885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9715828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04999614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04999614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07767392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36274904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626990310","doi":"","title":"21_Vicissitudes of Women's Inheritance Right-England, Canada and India at the Dawn of 21st Century","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Law; Framing (construction); Property (philosophy); Political science; English law; Colonialism; Ecological succession; Devolution (biology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0068259230433336295,"score_gpt":0.25306679709809177,"score_spread":0.24624087405475814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626990310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26969466,0.01149412,0.00066493655,0.08493644,0.00048318424,0.000059203536,0.0002903855,0.00004247265,0.63233465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93487084,0.0020359056,0.00027127538,0.0038919228,0.000044392993,0.000015401414,0.000024196203,0.0000111819445,0.058834996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718106,0.00033480482,0.00005016589,0.0002537598,0.00070386054,0.0014763606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986364,0.00035639456,0.00010950283,0.000060116698,0.00041825598,0.00041930316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010757145,0.00019185907,0.0002609725,0.0007842451,0.014897865,0.008762038,0.0009519351,0.0022270924,0.005511741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026941553,0.00020067555,0.00017063587,0.0011720591,0.02737399,0.0016989586,0.0032559745,0.0035644714,0.00020783555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000238145,0.000008716413,0.0020065126,0.00004099915,0.0000032208065,0.00051213935,0.037805635,0.00006343681,0.00024607326,0.9460645,0.005652296,0.007572709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027996033,0.000035456243,0.03830006,0.00053273863,0.000035996705,0.00064716354,0.11239596,0.00028212837,0.001121468,0.060260914,0.7862413,0.00011885266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96651745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97828615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071003936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071003936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07094761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.515172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2684633609","doi":"10.7202/1040056ar","title":"The Boundaries of Corporate Law and Trust Law: An Analysis of Locking v. McCowan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Corporate law; Duty of loyalty; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); CLARITY; Constructive trust; Business; Economics; Political science; Corporate governance; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.06008812866721274,"score_gpt":0.3362650276703774,"score_spread":0.27617689900316467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2684633609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25359878,0.0061346055,0.01271565,0.05041744,0.0001839877,0.00018435056,0.00010061522,0.00004573731,0.67661875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862454,0.0006900059,0.0005604342,0.0027846168,0.000062175255,0.00006544421,0.000016611903,0.000016174834,0.009559163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947678,0.0017669222,0.00014528021,0.00038680658,0.0011469339,0.0017862573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923574,0.005006734,0.0007788904,0.00031803493,0.00071206735,0.00082691817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004981967,0.00025491355,0.00046292183,0.0024191192,0.012629264,0.012061578,0.0016644178,0.0070323995,0.0055248225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012933385,0.00046706598,0.00094758836,0.0019305577,0.023982842,0.011577003,0.0063229958,0.0073718247,0.00036400228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005698191,0.000010837063,0.0005625503,0.000007360896,0.0000014792244,0.0003870613,0.003680638,0.00014302912,0.00003739994,0.9930354,0.0012489946,0.0008794633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044367156,0.000062616964,0.005267077,0.0006026942,0.000052492807,0.000670806,0.023237275,0.0047665243,0.0004385016,0.8766797,0.08808134,0.00009660559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09095845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07997991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09095845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020249723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011233068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18085802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26938422","doi":"10.7748/ns.30.19.61.s45","title":"Unjust Enrichment by Transfer: Some Comparative Remarks","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Law; Pretext; Common law; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); German; Civil law (Civil law); Adversarial system; Political science; Sociology; Commercial law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.05560637465699839,"score_gpt":0.36798483189039044,"score_spread":0.312378457233392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26938422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018559074,0.03054668,0.016621811,0.075658284,0.0013702585,0.00011148997,0.00015620438,0.0000739445,0.8569023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85657966,0.026309304,0.009068896,0.02994983,0.005218687,0.00054981664,0.000332949,0.00014981971,0.071840934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927469,0.0038685405,0.0002931875,0.0006934148,0.0013518278,0.0010461488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939726,0.0042998,0.0003359432,0.00039335137,0.0008088429,0.0001895045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071762535,0.0007872937,0.0011087508,0.006035922,0.008077595,0.01171955,0.0026521422,0.0067934925,0.011061733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012519329,0.00045206715,0.0014446382,0.0048174644,0.022816738,0.01832468,0.005482552,0.0066935234,0.0010894379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011879254,0.000014313571,0.00012632762,0.00004273814,0.0000033679812,0.00007321922,0.0014101885,0.000071348564,0.000042430143,0.99218607,0.0027112218,0.0033068259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031909938,0.000070479015,0.0030681668,0.00056050176,0.000027266075,0.0002689985,0.01032255,0.0009854999,0.00056170864,0.7812746,0.20279017,0.000038129943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013040058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010158202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013040058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012206614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024545104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08856559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733216121","doi":"","title":"Shifting Blame? Reassessing the Tort of Inducing Breach of Contract Following A.I. Enterprises v. Bram","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Blame; Breach of contract; Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Liability; Delict; Political science; Business; Damages; Economics; Private law; Comparative law; Black letter law; Psychology","score_opus":0.014101229843573515,"score_gpt":0.3095988311398896,"score_spread":0.2954976012963161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733216121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11778113,0.0058723153,0.021059996,0.3186239,0.0016864479,0.00009982201,0.00009350147,0.00014881439,0.53463405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9011447,0.0015571042,0.0052502775,0.05965899,0.00036354762,0.000050823317,0.000017679033,0.00004830794,0.031908594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887883,0.0026965728,0.00025397,0.0011816173,0.0045058066,0.0025736424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917218,0.0051684794,0.0004201655,0.00073097635,0.0014663469,0.000492193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012120963,0.00040835675,0.0006940174,0.001021059,0.015454597,0.008621977,0.0028311857,0.020079406,0.0018522808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02112706,0.0004721358,0.0006037442,0.0007896567,0.034826864,0.006560622,0.004827783,0.015676232,0.00032650272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009830008,0.000007718128,0.00022285049,0.000008872131,0.0000035630292,0.00019584324,0.0036555897,0.00026568465,0.00014401955,0.9869948,0.0060791667,0.002412051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048087328,0.00006781776,0.0022286095,0.0004556133,0.000073535135,0.00053774397,0.010403211,0.003625283,0.0013333252,0.7245567,0.25649163,0.00017847623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4539176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5479755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4539176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022991242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03434654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.902551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734331544","doi":"","title":"Constructive Trusts in Canada: Part 1","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trust Law International","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constructive trust; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.022251991621960315,"score_gpt":0.2915776204173321,"score_spread":0.2693256287953718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734331544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21609315,0.019442717,0.00531492,0.15236159,0.0012182168,0.00046003924,0.0027653049,0.00020190416,0.6021423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8279593,0.0048757116,0.0022996913,0.009175713,0.00015667254,0.00011632648,0.00040277073,0.00009580562,0.15491804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98827875,0.0013574032,0.00027818885,0.00072654797,0.0046171853,0.0047419416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828981,0.002618991,0.0009997346,0.0005323866,0.0071662865,0.00578453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039633317,0.00053422595,0.00066201854,0.0035349543,0.027092014,0.01597484,0.003079154,0.005453168,0.014348436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020876344,0.00074377516,0.0006630572,0.007849837,0.011510108,0.0038327638,0.004787116,0.0059794993,0.00068465894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036060155,0.00006354979,0.010476305,0.00014731125,0.000026357855,0.00025323275,0.013101278,0.00076421513,0.00011766942,0.8490945,0.0993977,0.02652179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067761786,0.000060216702,0.07692963,0.0007767598,0.00008980386,0.00037184314,0.039702922,0.0022392666,0.0005730697,0.08947093,0.7895036,0.00021426183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99581724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99851793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24489114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24489114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40838203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87581927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735793308","doi":"","title":"Weaving a Third Strand into the Braid of Aboriginal–Crown Relations: Legal Obligations to Finance Aboriginal Governments Negotiated in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Braid; Weaving; Political science; Negotiation; Law; History; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010713763013351902,"score_gpt":0.3185370621901113,"score_spread":0.3078232991767594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735793308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15405443,0.004463564,0.012056545,0.12861806,0.000525286,0.00016072103,0.00043215687,0.000113453934,0.6995757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921125,0.001062249,0.0038624436,0.0065744626,0.00007396323,0.00006183202,0.000050555995,0.00006285744,0.0671267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99295443,0.0011401807,0.00012782741,0.00038888375,0.0023634718,0.0030252524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920516,0.0026011115,0.00031938474,0.0004124109,0.0029667602,0.0016487362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048166253,0.0003715347,0.0005696885,0.0022509175,0.031126527,0.023273757,0.0029001073,0.007528599,0.010908592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01179675,0.0005418073,0.0005106481,0.0029540902,0.02362177,0.0052819,0.005626177,0.0085574845,0.00041607782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009288635,0.000010035883,0.0015590581,0.000026667376,0.000007342248,0.00009957152,0.02069559,0.00030982215,0.00010244902,0.9622967,0.009226143,0.0056573167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032072254,0.00002794541,0.01191284,0.0006679738,0.00006183056,0.00018260535,0.07744492,0.0024813942,0.0007489325,0.20582777,0.7004598,0.0001519536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12915547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12915547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33233103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9370929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736618327","doi":"","title":"La Cour supérieure de l’Ontario se prononce sur l’obligation d’une partie contractante à verser des royautés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.0395724038901633,"score_gpt":0.30355587079468044,"score_spread":0.26398346690451713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736618327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12546451,0.0023266468,0.0077546164,0.02649398,0.00055135577,0.0001350152,0.0006199946,0.00021397772,0.83643997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5138993,0.0008604768,0.0022455489,0.0018780871,0.00011536936,0.00007868707,0.00012600544,0.00012330388,0.48067322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951048,0.0006264425,0.00015141442,0.000509417,0.0021150983,0.0014929352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942213,0.0017583724,0.00047370294,0.00031304327,0.0022918405,0.00094169436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002059353,0.0004275935,0.00044627112,0.0012909202,0.019100245,0.007187745,0.0010810163,0.0030527376,0.024721483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077770627,0.00060013816,0.00067604997,0.0015189094,0.005883272,0.0026157622,0.0028802962,0.0046959314,0.0019672792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013951187,0.000026312136,0.008118979,0.00011141521,0.000037581893,0.0011075923,0.033441957,0.00070179923,0.0019752753,0.89044416,0.035021413,0.028874086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003438134,0.000045831624,0.027749775,0.00018695067,0.000031001233,0.0003155441,0.010625779,0.00056355237,0.0013612111,0.016063692,0.94291854,0.00010372438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9267954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9695032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048267152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059311826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35020435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737151909","doi":"10.7202/1058598ar","title":"L’impact de la transaction sur l’évaluation des dommages subis par la caution, le codébiteur solidaire ou d’autres personnes intéressées","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018327053076613226,"score_gpt":0.28871307597197604,"score_spread":0.27038602289536284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737151909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59335476,0.0028608807,0.012748445,0.036449328,0.00079562323,0.00032742025,0.00059762783,0.0000919223,0.35277405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96263474,0.00041141306,0.0020309149,0.0017227177,0.00010114546,0.00011767952,0.00016996509,0.000049457285,0.032762025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9631906,0.019569691,0.0013669879,0.0021914484,0.010802164,0.002879131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89164656,0.061288796,0.01047888,0.0072040004,0.02479698,0.0045847865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01950696,0.0005084428,0.0005737881,0.0013753715,0.004588699,0.0107332235,0.0017705103,0.003671436,0.04077347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10623245,0.0003607226,0.00087132584,0.0013613786,0.0053563006,0.0073184087,0.004732846,0.0038460172,0.004441646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029702762,0.00081296393,0.19698848,0.0006936677,0.00037645802,0.0030044348,0.061083525,0.004054361,0.0038077538,0.4981731,0.042364456,0.18567052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003428078,0.0023769676,0.34329042,0.0017065126,0.0005635873,0.0031515285,0.15533745,0.01449236,0.009051719,0.18388303,0.28536013,0.00044351985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02958774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026964827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04077347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009447894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009539821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13640088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738746496","doi":"","title":"Resulting Trusts in Canada: Part 1","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trust Law International","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04613864828702695,"score_gpt":0.2851674116505589,"score_spread":0.23902876336353196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738746496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2096275,0.006956238,0.0049305647,0.065788746,0.00082950765,0.00055770134,0.0044082417,0.000260895,0.7066407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.747599,0.0027003286,0.0028344751,0.0058770776,0.00009980193,0.000116179064,0.00073753076,0.00011395521,0.2399216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98667395,0.0009341274,0.00033866943,0.00076093763,0.006247926,0.0050445194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864407,0.0014797124,0.0006017246,0.00050163904,0.007398011,0.003578161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003618031,0.00049452594,0.0005348766,0.0036923757,0.024513017,0.015601146,0.0030086078,0.0045059067,0.019445298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02062129,0.00075878465,0.0008342961,0.006930695,0.0072668428,0.0026828172,0.004616708,0.0055528707,0.0010059424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040388768,0.00005923412,0.01239831,0.00012835732,0.000036522433,0.0004223501,0.007555593,0.0010014656,0.00014016457,0.85006106,0.10449145,0.02366507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008487085,0.00006417615,0.07137217,0.0006764491,0.00014745959,0.000502596,0.024163257,0.003323101,0.0010228397,0.0824603,0.8159718,0.00021098169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99470866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21875423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21875423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33824897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90613437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739427840","doi":"10.29173/alr781","title":"The Tortious Liability of Directors and Officers to Third Parties in Common Law Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Tort; Law; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Strict liability; Supreme court; Limited liability partnership; Common law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0224902468524259,"score_gpt":0.326771590468478,"score_spread":0.3042813436160521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739427840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12855749,0.22768576,0.0022571364,0.13256016,0.0014055315,0.00021689337,0.0006838568,0.00006653963,0.5065667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8447233,0.06985272,0.0011938874,0.022244882,0.0006114312,0.000041739688,0.00021183786,0.000029463397,0.061090816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897467,0.0010025833,0.00032173624,0.0006357893,0.0055219135,0.0027712553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859292,0.0052291085,0.0012275451,0.00032559727,0.0055017876,0.0017867642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063375193,0.00031838968,0.0007331676,0.0048421663,0.010676206,0.008519693,0.00249433,0.004781522,0.0039494154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014773943,0.0006081524,0.0005766741,0.005644333,0.008001779,0.0016667711,0.002324143,0.004267231,0.0002466224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051620285,0.00008834497,0.010969782,0.0005949709,0.0001079274,0.0012937351,0.004781694,0.0028372214,0.00036539478,0.81194407,0.110571265,0.056393966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083810985,0.00008523488,0.08789175,0.0031538398,0.00052343117,0.00055249245,0.008378989,0.0027210119,0.0009519326,0.094030686,0.8013059,0.00032088012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98960507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99553055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12665181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12665181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25892094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9189275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740095659","doi":"","title":"Filling the gaps: recognition of environmental protection as a charitable purpose","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legislation; Law; Environmental law; State (computer science); Action (physics); Political science; Relation (database); Private law; Business; Public law; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.016397104349343307,"score_gpt":0.19764272274169553,"score_spread":0.18124561839235223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740095659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15054451,0.0031768042,0.029266285,0.1491441,0.00058491726,0.00016598307,0.000051828523,0.000061199695,0.66700447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750699,0.00064914476,0.004301865,0.0053834547,0.00011391069,0.00007673771,0.000013424692,0.000020898828,0.014370715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808997,0.009479528,0.0005748936,0.0011849822,0.005078271,0.0027827027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98315316,0.009041256,0.0016118388,0.0018085116,0.0026956743,0.0016896187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01610146,0.00020763311,0.00078099535,0.0015216027,0.009453867,0.011649958,0.0015290049,0.008012725,0.0039552567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019973373,0.0004549178,0.0006464629,0.0011583274,0.042826027,0.00961469,0.013685281,0.0081747705,0.00038377824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005725841,0.00001958853,0.0005154346,0.00003991969,0.0000031165227,0.00010978497,0.007824652,0.0001239887,0.00011051378,0.9848386,0.0012083156,0.005200343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024151885,0.00008019738,0.005286434,0.0006647085,0.00002054517,0.00044702346,0.026201451,0.0010024124,0.0005291239,0.7949851,0.1707051,0.000053796706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020902127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035733476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020902127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009196718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026028603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0851537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751540023","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1263","title":"The Properties of Planning: An Evolving Landscape","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Scholarship; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Property rights; Law; Political science; Function (biology); Object (grammar); Property law; Sociology; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Business; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.053760351179483606,"score_gpt":0.36115950563449417,"score_spread":0.30739915445501054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751540023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006630317,0.3889713,0.015565428,0.4055458,0.012947844,0.000027320713,0.00014617924,0.00019918541,0.16996661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3042829,0.5349953,0.015511169,0.044955987,0.051945433,0.00015006601,0.00030316104,0.0008230381,0.047032893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970651,0.0014707235,0.000116112686,0.0003451584,0.00071014924,0.00029268724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934895,0.004730934,0.0002850525,0.00036344782,0.00047470728,0.0006564012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045364546,0.0006815867,0.0011322497,0.004125933,0.006446508,0.02296767,0.0024705706,0.004999015,0.011572071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054786196,0.00072839286,0.0006157684,0.007409776,0.03623238,0.027294816,0.007307225,0.009500262,0.0010067342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015636779,0.000026054351,0.00036897924,0.0002811523,0.0000071225377,0.00011841577,0.0061506927,0.00048971816,0.00007843602,0.85759056,0.07342737,0.061445896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029473092,0.000016469323,0.00035830445,0.00055015145,0.000003854081,0.00017146737,0.005872873,0.00037172696,0.000048006026,0.19404015,0.7985459,0.000018097382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006441666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007403679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02296767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008744111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006720083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06344324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751766599","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0098","title":"Parenthood is a fiduciary relationship","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Law; Possession (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Discretion; Sociology; Epistemology; Duty; Philosophy; Geography; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0440035289107704,"score_gpt":0.2702720190051765,"score_spread":0.2262684900944061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751766599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08518419,0.0038986048,0.015529098,0.033879396,0.00065911765,0.000066269386,0.00016088119,0.00007843378,0.860544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444222,0.0013734591,0.0020904497,0.0047412408,0.00013625303,0.000035657395,0.00004418652,0.000021478529,0.047135133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450666,0.0016868094,0.00017772533,0.0008146677,0.0013643325,0.001449864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996274,0.0011402501,0.0004616729,0.00032154348,0.0010954785,0.0007070841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044301273,0.00017434057,0.00028646956,0.0005545481,0.013576887,0.004766019,0.00085397647,0.002689599,0.008637711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008481577,0.00026364523,0.0002124907,0.0009262224,0.016048554,0.003989221,0.0034604163,0.0029346978,0.0010902502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007462989,0.000007723674,0.0020300045,0.000013194388,0.0000028139907,0.0002989476,0.015791412,0.00003097361,0.00009240154,0.9647614,0.0061654216,0.010798266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000206768,0.000040549163,0.011194154,0.00024945394,0.000020514659,0.0013370932,0.016532693,0.0002419465,0.00033293955,0.17072281,0.7992472,0.000059903952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2750198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33758447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2750198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011160189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017982513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54683805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751928772","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340016","title":"Private Prosecutions in Mauritius: Clarifying Locus Standi and Making the Director of Public Prosecutions more Accountable","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Supreme court; Legislation; Political science; Constitution; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.11390202566414076,"score_gpt":0.40719505907110903,"score_spread":0.2932930334069683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751928772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.541789,0.019405298,0.0059439554,0.19477463,0.0013386335,0.00017693527,0.00007573215,0.00007398063,0.23642191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789075,0.0018298611,0.0019892433,0.006737515,0.00037023498,0.00006851768,0.000013582846,0.000010098034,0.0100733405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298906,0.0030007737,0.0004484286,0.0005010394,0.0009110662,0.0021495996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98658305,0.0076646623,0.0025605576,0.0011276536,0.0008401111,0.0012239234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007607867,0.00029810477,0.00043557055,0.001635465,0.01070367,0.009692261,0.0015350247,0.008142451,0.0026863893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021318901,0.00051768706,0.0004447196,0.0012071915,0.014106509,0.0075261155,0.009359573,0.0072780345,0.00028428124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031621883,0.000038800517,0.008636011,0.00009731276,0.000014678402,0.0026995488,0.06298771,0.00024882125,0.0009989918,0.89592665,0.0069032926,0.021416496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011672777,0.00029750398,0.0792703,0.0024630455,0.0001719873,0.0033975618,0.062009107,0.00263823,0.0039226753,0.2194764,0.6260443,0.00019221933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03710257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07359788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03710257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010653486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015664259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07729679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756635865","doi":"10.29173/alr794","title":"An Action on the Equities: Re-Characterizing Bhasin as Equitable Estoppel","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Supreme court; Duty; Doctrine; Law; Meaning (existential); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14661944682417943,"score_gpt":0.432664828031975,"score_spread":0.28604538120779555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756635865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028291509,0.008097335,0.016451655,0.26547554,0.0015450703,0.00008617578,0.00008454849,0.000045046836,0.6799231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8147587,0.0026555702,0.0058749258,0.1063283,0.0006891826,0.000105574625,0.000032678185,0.00005653315,0.069498554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861915,0.004488043,0.00043380377,0.0017075003,0.005430538,0.0017485294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953661,0.0023430171,0.00029391787,0.00046864589,0.0011475733,0.00038083675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009365437,0.00036570712,0.00066831306,0.0010214302,0.0111796865,0.010100856,0.0022985635,0.009180968,0.0031778293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013960829,0.00041549973,0.00044365323,0.0009557178,0.045006838,0.0072483663,0.0075138765,0.020763252,0.00044522542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021283079,0.0000021280052,0.0000666251,0.000005849529,0.0000010467045,0.000027378477,0.0014858785,0.000025645999,0.000023293142,0.9945117,0.0025181859,0.0013300783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023579854,0.000027477874,0.0011236657,0.00039291478,0.000015410164,0.0001621415,0.004902611,0.00053643424,0.00045147896,0.6899577,0.30235153,0.00005508549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2896779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3830326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2896779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019031884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034524627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5759835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756978318","doi":"10.29173/alr790","title":"A Rational Approach to Cabinet Immunity Under the Common Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Impartiality; Public interest; Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Cabinet (room); Common law; Doctrine; Law and economics; Discretion; Sociology","score_opus":0.07445598635515686,"score_gpt":0.37197572510287996,"score_spread":0.2975197387477231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756978318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021490255,0.0025500895,0.41800305,0.08030795,0.0009980096,0.0005796664,0.00019808835,0.0002809643,0.47559196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8093296,0.0015371364,0.13300693,0.014500733,0.0016593549,0.0009729006,0.00010344928,0.00013369991,0.03875619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751951,0.008104223,0.0011171845,0.004424764,0.009211729,0.0019469629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99137163,0.003922424,0.000660931,0.0016188032,0.0019902678,0.0004358953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020732734,0.00094160216,0.0012814618,0.0030063605,0.0057720887,0.014598978,0.0041931327,0.0146410605,0.0043546828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018811017,0.0009330688,0.0018934086,0.001259957,0.04762365,0.0113408975,0.0041875197,0.013547995,0.0011993758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015607591,0.000003755535,0.000013344146,0.0000029667308,0.0000014730329,0.000010215703,0.000090276415,0.00013922488,0.00002188013,0.9991881,0.00019198068,0.00033511705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015392432,0.000011203275,0.0000293648,0.000024572535,0.0000054339107,0.00001583366,0.00004431471,0.0011579886,0.000101683785,0.99149245,0.007088718,0.000012928962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010925934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010837842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020732734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01558397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017390577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11307013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757350045","doi":"10.29173/alr789","title":"Hryniak v. Mauldin Comes to Alberta: Summary Judgment, Culture Shift, and the Future of Civil Trials","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Civil procedure; Test (biology); Political science","score_opus":0.046066588270874745,"score_gpt":0.37091813333592605,"score_spread":0.3248515450650513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757350045","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09134393,0.026146762,0.00315018,0.44533235,0.0013867402,0.000051360526,0.000109036046,0.000089768815,0.4323898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789945,0.007200371,0.0018680794,0.058044843,0.0004779194,0.000024068715,0.00004406225,0.00004833351,0.053297795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037033,0.0019880217,0.00022616267,0.00074014784,0.004699955,0.0019754225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882272,0.0061173495,0.00052227423,0.0005478055,0.002816773,0.0017686652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008262286,0.000131626,0.00032767613,0.000904155,0.010801556,0.01230417,0.0018713367,0.0052863588,0.003571917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018763626,0.00033881032,0.00023450804,0.0013410795,0.021674339,0.0028697473,0.0023984849,0.006682692,0.0002942148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019185216,0.000015558546,0.0019697035,0.000049065413,0.000007339125,0.00032060477,0.0050634025,0.00031561046,0.00028104446,0.9181204,0.041917406,0.031920735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006665299,0.000054210308,0.021072874,0.0007101791,0.000056113426,0.00035218132,0.019863045,0.001180099,0.0011250847,0.32057926,0.6347846,0.00015572249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82575506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9175547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17424494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04556967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1035939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3505422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758059862","doi":"10.1017/9781108303972.012","title":"Prince Albert v Strange and Jasper Thomsett Judge and Her Majesty’s Attorney General","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.026361094684220748,"score_gpt":0.32363043773208566,"score_spread":0.2972693430478649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758059862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031239614,0.007983602,0.00068208703,0.22223747,0.0070037474,0.00019464949,0.0009621546,0.00029546215,0.7575169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016439537,0.0027366793,0.00028200564,0.05460143,0.0013731242,0.000092640636,0.00028255538,0.00013790111,0.92405415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687386,0.00042776554,0.00014689543,0.00039824288,0.0013692897,0.00078396656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936212,0.002367085,0.0002312954,0.0003226395,0.0018669069,0.001590896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00354942,0.0005660947,0.00072476675,0.00092093734,0.00745897,0.0045616576,0.0015447359,0.011316155,0.12205298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019427394,0.000670763,0.00058784406,0.00078463496,0.0015242747,0.0021927112,0.0029084492,0.009833342,0.039262187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014352671,0.000017734983,0.000298358,0.000019737954,0.0000023209611,0.00015184771,0.00012810601,0.00002009685,0.000045240045,0.019008853,0.9735806,0.0067127706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014261096,0.000014890116,0.001276218,0.00017842997,0.0000064088636,0.00017161127,0.00040289637,0.000097075565,0.00013352896,0.006382761,0.9913043,0.000017671913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058789045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12676223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12205298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034702686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016624307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4083079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758204849","doi":"","title":"Guardians of Legal Order: The Dual Commissions of Public Fiduciaries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Order (exchange); Beneficiary; Law; Loyalty; Law and economics; Discretion; Private law; Business; Political science; Economics; Public law; Finance","score_opus":0.03180910994011936,"score_gpt":0.3304465240453309,"score_spread":0.29863741410521155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758204849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10002549,0.0026124443,0.06669288,0.06416927,0.0006384596,0.000108739274,0.00008664855,0.00017354196,0.7654925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677521,0.0005009506,0.005979751,0.0031013251,0.00032437293,0.00008379605,0.00002342996,0.000055244956,0.022179076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873302,0.004702537,0.0004268747,0.0019597716,0.0032745479,0.002306059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828912,0.0072960425,0.0020532391,0.004479288,0.0021539752,0.0011262686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009732735,0.00038183335,0.0006854812,0.0016740494,0.009011819,0.01552474,0.0016022406,0.008172984,0.0064073233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027755905,0.00072601996,0.00097428286,0.0014014236,0.040385768,0.013679412,0.007703279,0.0092720855,0.00094695785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004506896,0.0000035775097,0.00013170805,0.0000028859624,8.1564957e-7,0.000021962984,0.00077505334,0.000044292377,0.00001454067,0.9971511,0.00078564795,0.0010639097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004326143,0.000016425416,0.0005256595,0.000090096306,0.000019137606,0.00013643233,0.0014777986,0.0012492415,0.00035105614,0.9273617,0.0687089,0.000020160149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014032889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010233209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01552474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012877555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00903992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09343362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760341954","doi":"","title":"Understanding Private Law's Remedies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Private law; Law and economics; Business; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.018481233417820656,"score_gpt":0.1990035888964465,"score_spread":0.18052235547862586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760341954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08910318,0.005358678,0.21118602,0.07603684,0.0004698939,0.00018416619,0.00017901704,0.000402058,0.6170802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612749,0.001355914,0.013172391,0.001814917,0.00024637257,0.00010167726,0.000050284714,0.000096612916,0.021886902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99021405,0.0039020688,0.00043877724,0.0014059959,0.0026548153,0.001384371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988601,0.005989809,0.0015682625,0.0020684153,0.0012323963,0.0005401089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010706069,0.00057703286,0.000976454,0.002694309,0.004404278,0.017046148,0.0025123882,0.009531264,0.007368611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015255647,0.0007461516,0.0014200433,0.001148553,0.03914742,0.024782756,0.0069889375,0.008273549,0.0010328434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016916717,0.0000069037483,0.00007625617,0.000008478395,0.0000017695797,0.000018592364,0.0004898741,0.00026148756,0.00003409642,0.99782205,0.00017795971,0.0011009215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069074244,0.0000064336705,0.0002017225,0.000046210178,0.0000058714086,0.000029839803,0.00049341563,0.0015449796,0.00013833398,0.9869819,0.010536297,0.000008027774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005541234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054453583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017046148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012796156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010113098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092842996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760860897","doi":"10.1017/9781316145364.005","title":"Rule-Following and Charity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.043362750025180946,"score_gpt":0.2616897700324361,"score_spread":0.21832702000725515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760860897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012234445,0.0060546007,0.098895885,0.011773417,0.0008752899,0.000075789045,0.0000960658,0.0002245718,0.8697699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8077479,0.0040809703,0.04940241,0.004933996,0.0010033651,0.00026052195,0.00023319143,0.00051273376,0.131825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544513,0.0019252573,0.00020279438,0.000799988,0.001255938,0.00037093394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687093,0.0016814704,0.00013249737,0.000656413,0.00056239177,0.00009636126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056200977,0.00049678003,0.0007247083,0.0011080628,0.003735956,0.0067466157,0.0020144016,0.0023823155,0.006936266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005729907,0.00046222933,0.0010474878,0.0009816693,0.020900426,0.008621227,0.0029623304,0.0067586666,0.002332347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022667582,0.000002561196,0.000017858702,0.000012549646,0.0000011004794,0.000012827664,0.00038421352,0.00005247383,0.00003855917,0.9959837,0.0007304304,0.0027614122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041772005,0.000005294206,0.000029771436,0.000035254052,0.000003317668,0.000032412365,0.00016085585,0.00023502175,0.0002450617,0.96276677,0.03647599,0.0000060619172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003003703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002425063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006936266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043732086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031176421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031729996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763015737","doi":"","title":"The civil law and the common law in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Political science; Tort; Public law; Liability","score_opus":0.01235951439075232,"score_gpt":0.23719560531633285,"score_spread":0.22483609092558055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763015737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021914419,0.05451455,0.0014314573,0.07362007,0.0013776481,0.00008315578,0.0014880572,0.0001052058,0.8454654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29237854,0.025107661,0.0015353133,0.010742796,0.0004324094,0.000057392495,0.00041356715,0.000116062365,0.6692162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774456,0.00015506778,0.0000536424,0.00020160236,0.0009197654,0.0009254025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809045,0.00048014423,0.000078989775,0.00006382576,0.00078044174,0.0005061615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084456796,0.0006319938,0.00067466294,0.002575467,0.018133594,0.0147222,0.0019212909,0.005875134,0.029714609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051839827,0.0007350606,0.00048801015,0.0072936267,0.009029836,0.0036189712,0.0018369115,0.0055205193,0.0016826334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018772624,0.000024124212,0.0011773871,0.00009464577,0.00001130802,0.0001737921,0.0029818802,0.0007772122,0.000049964558,0.8187654,0.15552995,0.020395476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022554732,0.000011948572,0.0052475473,0.00032621768,0.000025896763,0.000091433474,0.005545697,0.0010659478,0.00013652004,0.08533762,0.9021086,0.000079954545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99751127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99883085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82819283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17180716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.337177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9605863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763391450","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.024","title":"Up there in theBegriffshimmel?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.037839719998191176,"score_gpt":0.24046959381705613,"score_spread":0.20262987381886494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763391450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039550415,0.013540137,0.0070532174,0.062343143,0.0035766556,0.000020085865,0.0001151998,0.0002019661,0.90919447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14860985,0.0060824584,0.003617675,0.01420349,0.0010430688,0.00008740595,0.00014913824,0.0006085498,0.82559836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739444,0.0009179987,0.000074165015,0.00035511891,0.00061326346,0.0006449732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990011,0.00033082982,0.00005644398,0.00024304181,0.00025050747,0.00011799486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032735239,0.0008102765,0.00076851697,0.0012682491,0.009364813,0.011574532,0.0013416909,0.007718209,0.07826002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057934974,0.00075060147,0.0004026322,0.0014686686,0.013790779,0.022808062,0.0065540983,0.008686943,0.016105263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011152052,0.0000113862,0.00006721873,0.000019966146,0.0000016266584,0.000051852334,0.0016983334,0.000021777303,0.00004120886,0.91844636,0.06146916,0.018159902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061333494,0.000006248888,0.00014247518,0.00023814364,0.0000036880185,0.00007958993,0.0026878132,0.00007985619,0.00016457842,0.32007873,0.6764968,0.000015881398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015246646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030631464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07826002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056038043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038310566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26180583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765178681","doi":"10.1177/1473779517725010","title":"Punitive damages for breach of contract","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10015441868510054,"score_gpt":0.4525898886485318,"score_spread":0.3524354699634312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765178681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04324585,0.014816489,0.01776065,0.034087587,0.0017055626,0.00030633662,0.00032281995,0.00014344885,0.88761115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88281065,0.007931844,0.0045434786,0.026459746,0.0009942469,0.00037916086,0.00019670447,0.000039625935,0.07664459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97490275,0.0063221874,0.0016728971,0.001899883,0.012559532,0.0026427296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906695,0.0037877313,0.0013114571,0.0012859403,0.0022273432,0.0007180533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011006322,0.0005654459,0.0007467424,0.0018775781,0.004231067,0.0050456966,0.0015981634,0.0071992083,0.0084925955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029396214,0.00038428273,0.0009799289,0.0013937544,0.007054701,0.002940206,0.0050764736,0.0063568023,0.0014073048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030305773,0.00009162598,0.001796661,0.00020376967,0.00006145608,0.00046651613,0.00086612883,0.0006789955,0.000463742,0.9319902,0.025200982,0.038149536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087602464,0.00045771888,0.016727269,0.0014512426,0.00012116378,0.0023562193,0.001444788,0.0014585338,0.0012797079,0.35788465,0.616572,0.00015908567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080651725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136443805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011006322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004356124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009118267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05820769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765213390","doi":"","title":"The Charter and Administrative Law Part II: Substantive Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisdiction; High Court; Administrative law; Agency (philosophy); Legislation; Sociology","score_opus":0.04338169592629922,"score_gpt":0.3700630900889842,"score_spread":0.326681394162685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765213390","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016376087,0.5525508,0.008669657,0.08575159,0.009444868,0.00050472916,0.0011802928,0.000119670076,0.34014082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09950735,0.58549196,0.00826619,0.109777376,0.019540811,0.0013310668,0.0015265655,0.00025769087,0.174301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98675984,0.002723989,0.00047647711,0.0009694054,0.0076348237,0.0014354263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790141,0.010142409,0.0009063872,0.0008757439,0.008544452,0.00051695737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012098043,0.00090322865,0.001360816,0.008400544,0.0065737776,0.015130345,0.0024617421,0.006440671,0.007710562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027736848,0.00095619145,0.00094782904,0.008672218,0.015017998,0.0046784505,0.0021335718,0.006757294,0.0028892446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010164432,0.000033731874,0.00021538335,0.001147857,0.000014885209,0.0000787179,0.00085873425,0.0006407235,0.00014764747,0.6990375,0.25797355,0.039840948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072519406,0.000014506586,0.0011985011,0.0047783777,0.000015761834,0.00004897229,0.000510738,0.00021585407,0.00011673641,0.04733152,0.94573647,0.000025211926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49887303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39747432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49887303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046174318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08986643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99193853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766092601","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0028","title":"Thinking like a private lawyer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Relation (database); Tort; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Centrality; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy; Liability; History","score_opus":0.021583469122099904,"score_gpt":0.27689184325087796,"score_spread":0.25530837412877805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766092601","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013606789,0.019949377,0.02668688,0.54856956,0.0056347,0.000041231462,0.00005554234,0.00018918408,0.38526675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6432096,0.01955945,0.009489493,0.15435384,0.0068371184,0.00009588948,0.00008796436,0.00017948613,0.1661872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951338,0.002217722,0.0001252391,0.0007823444,0.0011918979,0.0005490183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643195,0.0017521367,0.0003537055,0.00042672697,0.00046833814,0.00056709093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004630793,0.00025217855,0.00036902403,0.0006866153,0.004571698,0.010387113,0.00082249765,0.0071320166,0.01039829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084750755,0.00023455701,0.00033495075,0.00063784077,0.022942754,0.012493146,0.002904972,0.0077713393,0.0023697994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003475936,0.000013597592,0.00022251996,0.00005230531,0.0000046369087,0.000070658076,0.003858588,0.00008051733,0.000078746714,0.9519836,0.033385724,0.0102456845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063798107,0.000013733331,0.00028444474,0.00026938136,0.000005681258,0.0002489565,0.004990518,0.00024538985,0.00011918709,0.53395003,0.45985338,0.000012845974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002633572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041843276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01039829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031591135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006315415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034785748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767359026","doi":"","title":"Absorbing South Australia's Wills Act Dispensing Power in the United States: Emulation, Resistance, Expansion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Enforcement; Emulation; Doctrine; Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Political science; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.07678254969469327,"score_gpt":0.3774721211482265,"score_spread":0.3006895714535332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767359026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2900556,0.02824374,0.0016454137,0.29697368,0.0016280279,0.00006753337,0.00003015427,0.000038139657,0.38131773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82518494,0.020444907,0.0015566888,0.04561877,0.00035332874,0.000049878974,0.000023304012,0.000028406766,0.10673975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965192,0.0015473282,0.00012905314,0.00027894916,0.0008883012,0.0006371195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981275,0.0009902611,0.00018215731,0.00010085935,0.00031772343,0.00028153704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045785583,0.00018812342,0.00023279955,0.00081619737,0.010658216,0.006642437,0.00058248517,0.0042019645,0.0023356716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005345162,0.00043310435,0.00026542155,0.0010755709,0.015678352,0.004718799,0.0049865595,0.0065140785,0.00035616805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016257158,0.000050179115,0.0018718432,0.00015011207,0.000010269936,0.0009481898,0.25015712,0.00013276534,0.0009662639,0.6659672,0.03700294,0.04272675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008766473,0.00007242757,0.015140949,0.00076250057,0.000018863253,0.00042544017,0.062422242,0.00031622092,0.0009891039,0.051634926,0.86815345,0.000055206547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2366901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42912748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2366901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01436841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018377623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4706248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767969853","doi":"","title":"A Good Faith goodbye?: Good Faith Obligations and Contractual Termination Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lloyd's maritime and commercial law quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Obligation; Law; Good faith; Political science; Fair dealing; Faith; Doctrine; Judicial discretion; Bad faith; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.013978661039295258,"score_gpt":0.29527916078286465,"score_spread":0.2813004997435694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767969853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044133443,0.006919162,0.090943605,0.1027482,0.0009441337,0.00012928853,0.000053859818,0.000098340075,0.7540299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132905,0.0016722082,0.0108593255,0.018770844,0.00087697443,0.0001729879,0.000032546177,0.00009556707,0.054229017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98699796,0.00589902,0.0006235864,0.0013322697,0.0032863722,0.001860828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98856854,0.006361081,0.0008931367,0.0019902694,0.0014276707,0.000759265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011890284,0.00028174996,0.00048304172,0.00067437394,0.0061905105,0.010949612,0.001875383,0.011300934,0.0061817686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017456105,0.0004896022,0.0005241907,0.0007118579,0.05091488,0.017101374,0.0072638057,0.011171866,0.0010846308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025650243,0.0000025819934,0.000065481676,0.000005578781,6.052259e-7,0.000026293315,0.0011004502,0.00004258264,0.00002983947,0.9968362,0.0006277718,0.0012600544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011158579,0.000017362801,0.00032575085,0.00019034214,0.0000038108146,0.0001748461,0.0017063877,0.0004897604,0.0002181239,0.9090244,0.08781564,0.000022469565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012361253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008586345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012361253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052356073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006735505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06288254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768672397","doi":"10.1353/llt.2017.0059","title":"Daunting Enterprise of the Law: Essays in Honour of Harry W. Arthurs ed. by Simon Archer, Daniel Drache and Peer Zumbansen","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Scholarship; Law; Sociology; Legal education; Political science","score_opus":0.017761200915965853,"score_gpt":0.2848265925646765,"score_spread":0.2670653916487107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768672397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027224373,0.41515383,0.00084783207,0.37361377,0.07826445,0.00008091231,0.0001249003,0.000074566284,0.12911737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061288606,0.3469388,0.0017883978,0.056175224,0.06280078,0.00031630258,0.0003050198,0.00035334963,0.47003344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549085,0.0018894237,0.00021585973,0.00037686623,0.0016691526,0.00035789728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922868,0.003285897,0.00046849553,0.0003079728,0.0024965801,0.0011541332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041660625,0.0016439367,0.001067795,0.0024006218,0.007260519,0.0106473565,0.0016084464,0.004502492,0.011675147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017223315,0.0006530844,0.0005470834,0.0021408673,0.009096424,0.007008506,0.0047946344,0.0071250545,0.006931555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007661317,0.000020581423,0.00006691915,0.0001687053,0.000004547508,0.0000995932,0.0054471083,0.000040921368,0.00014870724,0.012475845,0.9587337,0.022785783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025194804,0.0000065930963,0.00037702755,0.0008535336,0.0000034819136,0.000085129475,0.0037887446,0.000015939591,0.00005407713,0.0029058692,0.99189234,0.000014734769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013413355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01661783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013413355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006915356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071419706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050174713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769474352","doi":"","title":"R. v. White: Privacy in Common Spaces","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Apartment; White spaces; White (mutation); Law; Business; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.022256719890471833,"score_gpt":0.34122230611480425,"score_spread":0.3189655862243324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769474352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0516454,0.0040936023,0.009057558,0.16934092,0.0009369344,0.00024150974,0.00052388833,0.00018582403,0.76397437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6372976,0.0020126663,0.0032430552,0.17127915,0.0006271972,0.00032037764,0.00016066764,0.000076534496,0.18498278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98691666,0.0024331803,0.00055088813,0.0018714075,0.004537749,0.0036901312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460065,0.0027201718,0.00033983297,0.0005632362,0.0012670778,0.0005090128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007312644,0.0005604268,0.00060462754,0.000634023,0.012796144,0.0066911303,0.0021048656,0.02374324,0.00494485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013655089,0.00090139307,0.0011112663,0.000924468,0.012422352,0.0035843875,0.0037194376,0.010427516,0.0013207657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029093291,0.000015631169,0.001081346,0.000035092267,0.000017352428,0.0008813219,0.0052267686,0.00022106608,0.0006187426,0.92645776,0.060219407,0.005196347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016441927,0.00012277871,0.008551259,0.00061640126,0.00014222859,0.0011657977,0.00613905,0.0012363794,0.002408442,0.23454668,0.7446637,0.00024282867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5249245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62022734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5249245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011784566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02455351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9557466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769845677","doi":"","title":"Philosophy of Property Law, Three Ways","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Salience (neuroscience); Economic Justice; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.047372108512942136,"score_gpt":0.30985864818866304,"score_spread":0.2624865396757209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769845677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013820035,0.025507698,0.11900513,0.39107025,0.003441475,0.00009167814,0.0002999553,0.0002608792,0.44650295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7882033,0.015068773,0.04461744,0.059397344,0.004150205,0.0005852439,0.00023334453,0.00027306378,0.08747137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959395,0.0015360841,0.00016479782,0.00078107003,0.0011618083,0.0004167471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972172,0.0010272288,0.00022490598,0.0006750903,0.00047568412,0.00037994044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005861922,0.00065254065,0.00076845003,0.0015892121,0.004268277,0.012545404,0.0022655828,0.005710059,0.008423684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008157807,0.00046452,0.0009874715,0.0014159739,0.04508906,0.021958422,0.0061441106,0.008917188,0.001594899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044278718,0.0000049311475,0.00006703019,0.000017052198,0.0000029192852,0.0000119717515,0.0007284234,0.000027300342,0.000041842304,0.99412316,0.0024840944,0.002486806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076261263,0.0000081849885,0.00012610375,0.000073460316,0.000002112527,0.000043017473,0.0008898034,0.00014723434,0.000056251785,0.94883955,0.049799077,0.0000076279307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028556243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002261055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012545404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053186845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033183913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038589954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771094306","doi":"10.7202/1043160ar","title":"Understanding Fiduciary Duties and Relationship Fiduciarity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Duty","score_opus":0.265366381501558,"score_gpt":0.35988028068368266,"score_spread":0.09451389918212466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771094306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11476459,0.027255043,0.06674871,0.12293612,0.0009085657,0.000055490742,0.00006571577,0.00006219079,0.6672036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97101945,0.005822478,0.006216171,0.004889493,0.0004918737,0.000057380304,0.00003448975,0.00003234375,0.011436341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920333,0.0045373607,0.00029577885,0.0008001352,0.0013925876,0.0009408181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876138,0.008289567,0.0013037712,0.0008725702,0.0011022355,0.0008180861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011068381,0.00040263796,0.0004995841,0.002728773,0.006942934,0.011954151,0.0013540785,0.0055614454,0.0034377312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019279484,0.00037925312,0.00046620614,0.0016105467,0.047977027,0.020416673,0.0071212365,0.0062668966,0.0006558148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024690798,0.00000469757,0.00027754364,0.000012233403,7.147923e-7,0.000029168337,0.010077526,0.000081829596,0.00002506892,0.98423356,0.0006510533,0.004604098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004418223,0.000012720545,0.0010886884,0.00028118267,0.0000042698184,0.000166951,0.009480133,0.0005700349,0.000111443085,0.9033102,0.08495232,0.000017782055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008978535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007923741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011954151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009341772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007999213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06777966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771167011","doi":"","title":"Trust Proliferation: a View from the Field","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Creditor; Settlor; Business; Blind trust; Service provider; Quarter (Canadian coin); Trust law; Service (business); Public relations; Accounting; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Marketing; Political science; Finance; Law; Economics; Debt; Computer science","score_opus":0.02735742480931214,"score_gpt":0.32216895906608556,"score_spread":0.2948115342567734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771167011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003978339,0.011371017,0.0017422717,0.7310688,0.0077168355,0.000011876427,0.00032082034,0.00003477058,0.2437553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42214164,0.03000395,0.002677605,0.33930695,0.042786885,0.0001259239,0.0002716721,0.00021427589,0.1624711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749726,0.00093068456,0.000081132675,0.00024194295,0.00089078397,0.00035827217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829122,0.013626082,0.0006658953,0.0005192002,0.0014560582,0.00082054565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033752823,0.00024905152,0.0003598274,0.0017399058,0.004694639,0.013474809,0.0012800833,0.018047811,0.025528202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013468694,0.0001996505,0.00043013066,0.0023253895,0.008553093,0.013446669,0.002673727,0.010341233,0.0027602292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008489613,0.000012082788,0.00009252827,0.000042283424,0.0000013125245,0.000059027738,0.0014713611,0.000036580375,0.000033109856,0.7994166,0.19188192,0.006944639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001364084,0.00001678974,0.0009593156,0.0006941967,0.000008517167,0.00015414106,0.0048720133,0.0003776775,0.00021467637,0.36187267,0.6307871,0.000029224717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074980585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016360214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025528202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004724663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004704908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08540028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772060348","doi":"10.30965/21967954-00703006","title":"Legal Justice or Social Justice?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ancient Judaism","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Economic Justice; Law; Politics; Rule of law; Ideology; Judicial discretion; Sociology; Balance (ability); Law and economics; Political science; Judicial review; Psychology","score_opus":0.04834933086475986,"score_gpt":0.3593653180829019,"score_spread":0.31101598721814205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772060348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01506744,0.038032513,0.004004413,0.43416905,0.0037058194,0.000027348198,0.00008793077,0.000055824225,0.5048497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8879726,0.011778345,0.0015534913,0.05306433,0.007439487,0.00006612376,0.0000747253,0.00004639932,0.038004436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994396,0.0026184167,0.0001313727,0.0007697503,0.0008674792,0.0012170348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629515,0.0020101217,0.0003401269,0.0003640641,0.00041681208,0.00057373045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043320637,0.0004834489,0.00068810914,0.0017415358,0.0075786826,0.008504823,0.0010146333,0.005947355,0.01082678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007969113,0.00013168149,0.00034406653,0.0013455201,0.0480588,0.0076617333,0.0040109046,0.005498487,0.0012655377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036338372,0.0000065006166,0.00009321909,0.000019624098,0.0000020650357,0.000023186212,0.0009346954,0.000028488348,0.000013794154,0.9891885,0.005758983,0.003927364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006907636,0.000009568158,0.00030352556,0.00012766197,0.000002456107,0.000044797634,0.0023374697,0.00007900095,0.000028845074,0.90048647,0.096567415,0.0000058875244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008093232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01082678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065028737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006440387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047181845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772461067","doi":"10.29173/alr1412","title":"When is a Stranger a Constructive Trustee - A Critique of Recent Decisions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Context (archaeology); Constructive trust; Duty; Supreme court; Constructive; Law; Law and economics; Third party; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Business; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.06114194055624174,"score_gpt":0.37705872795701184,"score_spread":0.3159167874007701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772461067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016516207,0.036496077,0.008321641,0.6994105,0.0014285604,0.00005330316,0.00013816415,0.00007136922,0.23756418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8719647,0.019554077,0.0028798205,0.075645946,0.001246699,0.000067237044,0.000051617666,0.00009119357,0.028498733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.972947,0.007537059,0.0009071694,0.0025531424,0.012622276,0.003433434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96372396,0.02147428,0.0011853451,0.0011742765,0.009978541,0.002463586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02212119,0.00041982776,0.0009665738,0.00362898,0.023322295,0.021315893,0.0050820233,0.014891779,0.0027822596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04469146,0.00064391876,0.0005347375,0.0044175438,0.101065494,0.009362517,0.0043273643,0.014219644,0.00047881863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034584966,0.0000023674363,0.00017786202,0.000027950913,0.0000030128256,0.00006278948,0.0052884636,0.00010125086,0.000014440959,0.97302306,0.014310397,0.006985054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021382575,0.000011365214,0.0019671745,0.00078764115,0.00003377059,0.00017478292,0.019898826,0.0005692048,0.00017516085,0.5498452,0.4264363,0.00007912719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8870873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9094983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8870873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1266314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14136653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9187794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773199602","doi":"","title":"The Zombie Theory of Contractual Consideration: Richcraft Homes Ltd. v Urbandale Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Appeal; Zombie; Law; Element (criminal law); Corporation; High Court; Rationalization (economics); Corporate law; Unconscionability; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Management; Computer science; Computer security; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.019297215981912762,"score_gpt":0.30216031960793316,"score_spread":0.2828631036260204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773199602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0793372,0.0053606136,0.004210606,0.11970577,0.00053002045,0.00018131261,0.00031078077,0.000048835947,0.79031485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7343077,0.0016782095,0.0012940007,0.045297295,0.00013507156,0.00012615701,0.00010419946,0.000030301657,0.21702702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973091,0.00031243562,0.000071854985,0.00039916387,0.0010961085,0.0008113173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992642,0.00026947368,0.00006139448,0.00003952111,0.0002078171,0.00015762709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015662771,0.0002543986,0.00022146008,0.00053444726,0.009879538,0.004445842,0.0011370839,0.0068733706,0.004473104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033594158,0.00045169002,0.00029548767,0.0006233509,0.007376854,0.002245407,0.0019493827,0.004827618,0.0005350831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002539891,0.00000933248,0.0013530876,0.000027740685,0.000005619589,0.00049806654,0.006217416,0.00010301913,0.0002743446,0.9293,0.057535443,0.0046505225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007248575,0.00006109853,0.012009825,0.00033047135,0.00005390065,0.00051649153,0.0106814895,0.0010334669,0.0012807376,0.107936405,0.8658665,0.0001572384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77372664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9102534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77372664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02697505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02078244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45521182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774480689","doi":"","title":"Justice Cromwell and Fiduciary Duties: Placing Law into Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Duty; Geography","score_opus":0.025602547427360053,"score_gpt":0.33768608179214077,"score_spread":0.3120835343647807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774480689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039032206,0.015495507,0.012294169,0.168175,0.0009815119,0.00009503151,0.00015016527,0.000044823013,0.7637316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8880845,0.0048977323,0.0033608277,0.056232538,0.00086351146,0.00008944839,0.000045004377,0.000057128942,0.04636925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935575,0.0015490209,0.00012074094,0.00081030093,0.001704339,0.002258147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642366,0.001773359,0.0002714264,0.00026073612,0.0008763716,0.00039443077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043627797,0.0004839944,0.0007631036,0.001928866,0.01767859,0.011885737,0.0027979105,0.013594831,0.0035394111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011672617,0.0005643925,0.00060789834,0.0017490425,0.043746363,0.0062901285,0.0052153217,0.012118063,0.0005131302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002519004,0.0000039479437,0.00019050253,0.0000068456,0.0000018036984,0.00007702226,0.0009403913,0.000072751565,0.000028394119,0.9939971,0.0034215115,0.0012572107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021625274,0.00002057954,0.0020095266,0.0003663101,0.000025623793,0.00012922274,0.004800253,0.00045738133,0.0002019714,0.8021337,0.18978088,0.000053068376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69136465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81592625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69136465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035925195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057534687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6209059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776654465","doi":"10.29173/alr1420","title":"Restitution of Unlawfully Levied Taxes: Survey and Comparative Analysis of Developments in Canada, Australia, and England","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Restitution; Jurisdiction; Law; Demise; Political science; Supreme court; Common law; Judicial review; Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.1326694708435435,"score_gpt":0.37378674089291236,"score_spread":0.24111727004936886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776654465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83515006,0.10001842,0.00022796362,0.0045835776,0.00007344211,0.00009166486,0.0010826593,0.00003115645,0.0587411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204845,0.0697683,0.00021088509,0.0006960911,0.000032302425,0.000020330417,0.00071925874,0.000018761311,0.008049603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954922,0.00041228486,0.00020952622,0.0002735159,0.0025918686,0.0010204682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97882104,0.0031438067,0.003209251,0.0002958451,0.012553724,0.0019762744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003012475,0.00020813994,0.000652648,0.011956466,0.005300042,0.004162718,0.001971267,0.00080535,0.001963982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010729755,0.00034768754,0.00034782084,0.023581862,0.003650346,0.0010240619,0.0013124057,0.001199305,0.0001775131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044870347,0.00038821567,0.48290163,0.0027586287,0.00022404917,0.0056782453,0.08612938,0.0012680263,0.0016504336,0.06772014,0.028573526,0.322259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000103275615,0.00007260124,0.8978269,0.00046555608,0.00007612616,0.0005555274,0.019405637,0.0002227039,0.00034653427,0.00028466448,0.0806836,0.000049761526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99503267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07505779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07505779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095029816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54458493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778321832","doi":"10.1097/hcm.0000000000000197","title":"Physician Personal Services Contract Enforceability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Health Care Manager","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kerr Wood Leidal Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Damages; Denial; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Service (business); Personal injury; Health care; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02506901617228765,"score_gpt":0.3739265919828994,"score_spread":0.3488575758106118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778321832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106566876,0.0026474728,0.03145171,0.045833487,0.00064649037,0.00038660626,0.00038182677,0.00008608247,0.8119994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9459149,0.0014734328,0.012397654,0.008677483,0.00045323416,0.00032232978,0.00014215118,0.000033344546,0.030585533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97653145,0.008415367,0.001350638,0.0016431102,0.008973751,0.0030857925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629868,0.022682715,0.0050163167,0.0033389512,0.0048372303,0.0011380704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024018368,0.0002405543,0.0003845662,0.0017313979,0.0064875777,0.006998326,0.0014596538,0.0046009556,0.008614547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04954472,0.00037616192,0.00069979083,0.0019943926,0.012110554,0.0036256763,0.0038724525,0.0049649724,0.0008416437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073754945,0.000029744568,0.0016990474,0.00001624099,0.0000032833007,0.00012367973,0.0019957707,0.00024413853,0.00007881785,0.98814327,0.0025235766,0.0051350747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053833086,0.00016008827,0.010907165,0.0008301382,0.000044177326,0.0007783263,0.0052963416,0.0032404247,0.0012882206,0.672967,0.30434406,0.00009010454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020954221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0171772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024018368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007156423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020413654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12702274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778804371","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634100.013.47","title":"New Frontiers in Public Fiduciary Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Public law; Private law; Law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Political science; Commercial law; Administrative law; International law; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.04867858654963091,"score_gpt":0.31068507205555695,"score_spread":0.26200648550592603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778804371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02178865,0.056829147,0.04848904,0.14428386,0.0019726933,0.00004790201,0.00012466496,0.00017560588,0.72628844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8623121,0.03578708,0.015064495,0.012064124,0.0043150582,0.0002200095,0.0001831555,0.00019373711,0.069860324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940964,0.0026034869,0.00020181513,0.00054929877,0.0017798975,0.0007690932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99330926,0.004619488,0.00027416545,0.00062025274,0.00084082375,0.00033604944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007677283,0.00047342968,0.0007051142,0.0035495365,0.005146804,0.015467561,0.0012070299,0.005049212,0.010549423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008326812,0.00045132227,0.0008453549,0.0029210378,0.03256609,0.029794877,0.0069608744,0.008323143,0.0015038262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011943588,0.000003629642,0.000021226497,0.000008720064,2.8129708e-7,0.000009363198,0.00027496423,0.000042048065,0.000006403703,0.99676114,0.0010954604,0.0017755964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032620005,0.000004962041,0.00007175758,0.00009273077,0.0000010886124,0.00003339763,0.0006284982,0.00030809178,0.000029107294,0.9165892,0.08223353,0.0000043682126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003165642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002712695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015467561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013368205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074222186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096993566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779499954","doi":"10.29173/alr1421","title":"The Commercial Lease: Property or Contract","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Lease; Property (philosophy); Business; Security of tenure; Law and economics; Contract management; Property law; Real property; Law; Economics; Property rights; Finance; Land tenure; Microeconomics; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.062097771221809414,"score_gpt":0.3676729607118963,"score_spread":0.3055751894900869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779499954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011033157,0.0075258394,0.015761333,0.03300717,0.00062723435,0.00010585124,0.00025265384,0.000081863705,0.93160486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.745148,0.0047266744,0.0066795005,0.016104974,0.0006805129,0.00013581628,0.00015451548,0.00012299913,0.22624697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946827,0.0011917724,0.00023681963,0.0007659555,0.0020619414,0.0010609031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752873,0.00091507245,0.00020290283,0.0003714155,0.0007511254,0.0002307762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027451292,0.00035314792,0.0004965793,0.0009918654,0.0046725236,0.009685846,0.0014449559,0.00527517,0.008837877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006328436,0.00033224773,0.00035312588,0.001897291,0.03452753,0.0057605742,0.0021454254,0.003964514,0.001178255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036708282,0.0000031618845,0.00015635203,0.00001808217,0.0000014666413,0.00005694034,0.0012980972,0.000048277558,0.00007855931,0.9867878,0.0077545936,0.0037930373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013843469,0.000034477907,0.0020387003,0.0003853128,0.000016024558,0.00052074314,0.005459236,0.00055547495,0.00033106902,0.39090523,0.59969395,0.000045815625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22951064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25437346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22951064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014026096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016111717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4563495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780438428","doi":"","title":"Negligence construction: does anything remain of Canada Steamship?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Liability; Law; Political science; History; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026369779185526937,"score_gpt":0.2581961531320378,"score_spread":0.23182637394651087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780438428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020002626,0.011557825,0.002549348,0.71110433,0.0013648826,0.000042014966,0.00040248295,0.0000522334,0.25292417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6513121,0.007085004,0.0019769345,0.23490644,0.00072164997,0.000050377846,0.00023024056,0.000059961796,0.10365737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936947,0.0005262959,0.0001376563,0.0007479206,0.0028772913,0.0020161087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945045,0.0016515468,0.00026523045,0.0001982616,0.0023074553,0.0010729672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003328419,0.00035924139,0.000488442,0.0011548861,0.015237312,0.009120439,0.0026060506,0.010310067,0.009342451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01220436,0.00033195456,0.00049299863,0.0013000519,0.020023957,0.0054680607,0.0031251637,0.010621299,0.00063229835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017334785,0.000010025048,0.001843072,0.00005772275,0.00001068768,0.00027447162,0.004095034,0.00010241086,0.00012395131,0.8827107,0.098012984,0.012741677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003529481,0.000032396987,0.013724586,0.000889039,0.00006876702,0.00035231403,0.013846417,0.000594708,0.00060618256,0.18942489,0.7802521,0.00017328186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9657886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9792941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054658514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054658514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12535486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39657718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781327244","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.6","title":"Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Doctrine; Administrative law; Political science; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Judicial review; Common law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Project commissioning; High Court; Sociology; Publishing","score_opus":0.2729267636078582,"score_gpt":0.5032675907602394,"score_spread":0.2303408271523812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781327244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13221967,0.06959441,0.04206462,0.27211457,0.0048186057,0.00022043835,0.00010142161,0.00010914446,0.4787571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615943,0.0057210717,0.0046211686,0.015625505,0.0014067683,0.000054785538,0.000017723813,0.000030444626,0.010928223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9647372,0.016211929,0.0013689577,0.0013726023,0.013028975,0.0032803246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90420264,0.06563785,0.0032826245,0.004598863,0.020446654,0.0018313332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042986047,0.00037111188,0.0009787878,0.0052937735,0.0055600265,0.011611193,0.0037461624,0.007488395,0.0025095684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071081005,0.00047800466,0.0008203545,0.0026737181,0.03145259,0.009840304,0.0057999385,0.011412905,0.00047106075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014171749,0.000015896405,0.0003161005,0.000084213476,0.000008215851,0.00016054952,0.0034630692,0.0003320085,0.00008857191,0.98413116,0.0034924278,0.007893595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043219,0.00012938963,0.0038338965,0.0019379852,0.0000709933,0.00032702266,0.0065169344,0.0027863998,0.000680557,0.7815584,0.20200922,0.00010597216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0851214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076974586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0851214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018312948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021218644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22733468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782880452","doi":"","title":"Trusts Through the Lens of Insolvency Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Creditor; Bankruptcy; Pension; Argument (complex analysis); Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Business; Trust law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Debt; Medicine","score_opus":0.02413821200159258,"score_gpt":0.3212921656526844,"score_spread":0.2971539536510919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782880452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03293237,0.12422262,0.011297635,0.17366506,0.0010766886,0.00006500016,0.00015094453,0.0000771659,0.6565126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92917824,0.02967666,0.0012737834,0.012015454,0.00071892753,0.000039977018,0.00003778925,0.00004733311,0.027011938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98924106,0.0032615592,0.0003424677,0.0006316866,0.0035507765,0.002972507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310005,0.0037542714,0.0005867255,0.00032637102,0.0017288498,0.0005038195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006834081,0.000365117,0.00067340065,0.0039330306,0.013652796,0.01781077,0.0019126249,0.008978616,0.003956354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0141394,0.00039462114,0.0006318459,0.0048821173,0.055417035,0.007951264,0.0035306448,0.008212621,0.00048860756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017915287,0.000003054476,0.00010809253,0.000025590942,0.0000022263214,0.000085690685,0.002989587,0.00011440268,0.000011999679,0.99000496,0.004299495,0.0023531276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010084442,0.000016735787,0.0026360496,0.001077506,0.00002788528,0.00028999077,0.009139322,0.0006660834,0.00010704272,0.6518565,0.33413693,0.000035904708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5546041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59227234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5546041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0683976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0612577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8960378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783016775","doi":"10.7202/1042771ar","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Common Law Property Rights and Remedies in Addressing Environmental Challenges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Tort; Legislature; Common law; Natural resource; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Enforcement; Political science; Sustainable development; Law; Environmental planning; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0478007788444951,"score_gpt":0.3046406056797497,"score_spread":0.25683982683525464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783016775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027187426,0.046940424,0.09394818,0.45844093,0.0026521618,0.00018047965,0.0000791861,0.00012512873,0.3704461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8271444,0.03569142,0.04041371,0.058913317,0.0053477124,0.0003499239,0.0000644435,0.00014248806,0.031932537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702234,0.011460378,0.0012601669,0.004347414,0.010178806,0.0025298109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536808,0.033069227,0.002972445,0.004395786,0.0040460615,0.0018356757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03134077,0.0006942651,0.0014111411,0.0029253813,0.008954942,0.016869664,0.0042462703,0.017341968,0.0049259216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0369355,0.0005518058,0.0013203714,0.0030250105,0.12219737,0.031734694,0.011016314,0.020359106,0.00055643724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010381038,0.0000063981074,0.000060893213,0.000024903733,0.000002338694,0.000030327052,0.0006332079,0.00017104622,0.000024342316,0.99437934,0.0009780435,0.0036881105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007050545,0.000022275659,0.00028242404,0.00043918172,0.000007367869,0.00011349016,0.0015764169,0.0007470041,0.00011584295,0.8918725,0.104782976,0.000033428983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020963889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021782639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03134077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01590169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023771329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16574776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784067893","doi":"10.3968/9998","title":"Comparison of Administrative Charge Systems in Main Countries and Regions in the World","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charge (physics); China; Politics; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Virtue; Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.11663979213946385,"score_gpt":0.42222792182558994,"score_spread":0.3055881296861261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784067893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8820582,0.0015239542,0.0018428102,0.0006297746,0.000058463942,0.00009663355,0.0025769696,0.00011569714,0.11109754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940539,0.0005192826,0.0009626539,0.00005621494,0.000009337848,0.00003109382,0.0010240525,0.000019108704,0.0033243864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980609,0.00049159565,0.00021656217,0.00018831385,0.0005636696,0.000478949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973339,0.00041081326,0.00065493095,0.00018983135,0.0011909243,0.00021953869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010647816,0.00021469175,0.0002451548,0.0054704263,0.001129444,0.0024409625,0.0005257858,0.00022880711,0.004734623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044031865,0.00016060461,0.00049085973,0.008406893,0.0010806575,0.0014543502,0.0011458326,0.00027960466,0.00054843194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004169736,0.00010561422,0.565156,0.00068396586,0.0002774469,0.0012019107,0.0106457025,0.0045728656,0.0013373246,0.25575787,0.022618791,0.13722557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041624826,0.00009664531,0.90213007,0.00017168843,0.00014748714,0.00047704738,0.015840854,0.0034063775,0.00085870747,0.007961872,0.06879338,0.000074224234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059018992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051952798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059018992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035923254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029804788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117350936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784397268","doi":"10.29173/alr2483","title":"Local Governments and the Crown's Duty to Consult","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Scope (computer science); Indigenous; Local government; Government (linguistics); Point (geometry); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Law; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.01962598754770941,"score_gpt":0.3250097497421313,"score_spread":0.3053837621944219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784397268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041554984,0.1383188,0.0025899368,0.29541376,0.001403875,0.000063651336,0.000114318114,0.00005357098,0.5204871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84945285,0.031085998,0.0013266883,0.05085091,0.0007658447,0.00005321465,0.000052108557,0.000026700016,0.06638566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891523,0.004256845,0.00033370423,0.0007500473,0.0030090662,0.0024980411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898435,0.00534652,0.0009085037,0.0005889951,0.002495937,0.0008166059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009973424,0.00018473313,0.00061313057,0.0017900212,0.0077775777,0.009406541,0.0020539497,0.008681257,0.0042089676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014798339,0.00039373114,0.00043693333,0.0024209656,0.023389522,0.0031551667,0.0027673473,0.0060043666,0.0005123048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038230332,0.000010222717,0.00036825376,0.00009140486,0.000007901273,0.000082970684,0.0024719345,0.00019279675,0.00005553367,0.97006464,0.01790012,0.0087504685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003966299,0.000036538004,0.0071492996,0.0016512107,0.00007452814,0.00020485344,0.009146305,0.00036786264,0.00016563894,0.37047756,0.61062807,0.00005854346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49294913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60882676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5070509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030340673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07142201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W278529428","doi":"","title":"Progress and paradox: the remarkable yet limited advance of employment Good Faith duties in canadian common law.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Good faith; Sociology; Fair dealing; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06557344148897327,"score_gpt":0.368046371583262,"score_spread":0.3024729300942887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W278529428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0723209,0.009712072,0.0031624215,0.33811873,0.0009329793,0.000042571402,0.00059223635,0.000076944736,0.5750412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95837736,0.001981514,0.0010533949,0.0136367865,0.00019123951,0.000015596454,0.00008866532,0.00003184809,0.024623657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922954,0.000915724,0.00017480651,0.0009977825,0.0035159881,0.0021003946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98615324,0.004398395,0.00058080495,0.0013816467,0.0054091257,0.0020767476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087397685,0.000251877,0.00052093714,0.0025032477,0.020377818,0.010387182,0.0022247,0.005815459,0.011026464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034712818,0.00025694421,0.00033446285,0.003104411,0.02722791,0.008454101,0.005208864,0.0068337247,0.00048180312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017952845,0.000011028418,0.0010127289,0.000030625673,0.00000509969,0.000052112573,0.0050467304,0.00016784325,0.00007839926,0.9536028,0.02188637,0.018088425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035098205,0.000029229765,0.025231106,0.00054439117,0.00004888906,0.000115704344,0.016745374,0.0011158042,0.00040952934,0.48917428,0.46644995,0.00010063858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94743687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97441643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06920729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06920729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16423662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50213635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785381600","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0009","title":"Class Action Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Compensation (psychology); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Mechanism (biology); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.050430366174970855,"score_gpt":0.40489152223698555,"score_spread":0.35446115606201467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785381600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058019903,0.0005041609,0.006957121,0.008118672,0.00016817506,0.00012765845,0.00047738134,0.00004739905,0.9255794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96617246,0.00017793673,0.0009004269,0.0007579875,0.00008967338,0.000051918672,0.00014866874,0.000012190515,0.031688575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98879087,0.0027799238,0.0003041008,0.001068284,0.0049504433,0.0021063394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841817,0.0043331212,0.001514942,0.0021189996,0.005826591,0.0020245686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006890486,0.00034577414,0.000466669,0.0026520907,0.003879638,0.006869215,0.0014316583,0.0018579721,0.03199084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021695597,0.000121995065,0.00033218344,0.0018938386,0.0066109165,0.0030369963,0.0025700843,0.0015367182,0.0015326929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028726801,0.000052260963,0.017346688,0.0000511762,0.00003100127,0.00010749671,0.0021331492,0.00051065243,0.00019174254,0.93309844,0.010410158,0.036038525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005028563,0.00012467803,0.08927687,0.0005707681,0.00013682943,0.00042424482,0.009963977,0.0031990027,0.0008707902,0.4574671,0.4378301,0.00008536459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07254713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08634018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07254713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01272982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00891571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14424974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785682043","doi":"","title":"Chapter 3 - Public Benefit and the Substantive Public Law-Private Law Divide","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Doctrine; Commercial law; Municipal law; Political science; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022330442370739,"score_gpt":0.2643437563897173,"score_spread":0.2420133140189783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785682043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009893794,0.011499906,0.023881696,0.068166316,0.0022062527,0.00008893712,0.0002703389,0.00008799953,0.8839049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43200493,0.011427881,0.012890478,0.030563395,0.005036933,0.000363926,0.0002744664,0.0004136635,0.50702435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876887,0.00036050077,0.00003240796,0.0001790201,0.00048919,0.0001699854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986066,0.00091911573,0.000081247934,0.00011866618,0.00020398262,0.00007030163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012724099,0.00033394955,0.00028567587,0.0006995641,0.0037637223,0.006588533,0.0010235304,0.0034728155,0.02348174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030562063,0.00023669572,0.0005432951,0.0011802174,0.009303533,0.005577833,0.0022504742,0.007469165,0.0030981307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032358496,0.0000067747746,0.00007898778,0.000021410322,0.0000011367017,0.00001649845,0.0011583638,0.000072445386,0.000055090004,0.9841033,0.012175886,0.0023067207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055038777,0.0000147225965,0.00054315425,0.00030316386,0.0000039392853,0.00007234417,0.0019337363,0.00031149003,0.00030705237,0.5905873,0.4059068,0.000010643304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047415304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062864367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02348174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003957448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002627382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07855421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785704511","doi":"","title":"Property Law in Scotland: Contrasts with Québec?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011979062312756741,"score_gpt":0.2760439192782633,"score_spread":0.2640648569655066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785704511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64384466,0.013028481,0.0009641647,0.09105504,0.0006702983,0.00013247988,0.002573808,0.000097075135,0.24763401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95139253,0.0020995878,0.000474732,0.008033646,0.00011677564,0.00003990871,0.00031241038,0.000034796085,0.03749563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642617,0.00044134635,0.00015791909,0.00023019817,0.0008283741,0.0019160393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429804,0.0013233444,0.000725577,0.00018926506,0.0023481033,0.0011157314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026037486,0.0002535141,0.0007047444,0.003017632,0.010725009,0.009036004,0.0020442584,0.002504684,0.012628176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075140935,0.00036775935,0.000727567,0.0066039683,0.0037072755,0.0026323674,0.00258078,0.0027641763,0.0005634215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010369774,0.0004146189,0.22532047,0.0010546483,0.00041869117,0.007749966,0.047314342,0.0019211126,0.0019304717,0.4516224,0.109972484,0.15124387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020688308,0.00016784368,0.556812,0.00096666336,0.000259324,0.0007864061,0.05670489,0.0011604264,0.00059585366,0.0073672016,0.37474543,0.0002271358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0705197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0705197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09078806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51165867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787200607","doi":"10.29173/alr1362","title":"The Devil Is in the Disclosure: The Role of R. v. Stinchcombe in Establishing Appropriate Disclosure Rules for Administrative Tribunals","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Law; Legislature; Political science; Supreme court; Administrative law","score_opus":0.05791606666371546,"score_gpt":0.34657442719945886,"score_spread":0.2886583605357434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787200607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18724665,0.011498618,0.028895589,0.18789646,0.0017319972,0.0005295637,0.00012641952,0.00024214805,0.5818325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103773,0.0024241616,0.011993984,0.036527745,0.0005218668,0.00014514859,0.00003572208,0.0000708155,0.03790321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9554452,0.011972074,0.003006477,0.0034015402,0.019134915,0.0070398077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96699655,0.020715764,0.0025572418,0.001679996,0.006527795,0.0015225986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041950777,0.0002757717,0.00088246004,0.0023543558,0.01732189,0.01488412,0.003019907,0.012379428,0.0015283099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06767595,0.00092885335,0.00072744733,0.0019550594,0.020990966,0.004336115,0.004862816,0.01371094,0.0004060264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019822875,0.000023730669,0.0021855538,0.00004112008,0.00000995464,0.0005837744,0.008238638,0.00040334577,0.0005594265,0.95963794,0.013395643,0.014901127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013351398,0.00027771163,0.01689822,0.0016546199,0.00016266784,0.001431056,0.017187793,0.0047093453,0.005405654,0.29883865,0.65279806,0.0005026701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3793368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54498917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018306512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06197673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7542576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787245113","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0030","title":"Overcoming Dicey in administrative law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Administrative law; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Public law; Delegation; Legislature; Judicial review; Accountability","score_opus":0.033788770659844036,"score_gpt":0.310458407285915,"score_spread":0.27666963662607097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787245113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016800756,0.025688596,0.014413937,0.32481444,0.00317063,0.000044042463,0.00004771245,0.00017676495,0.61484325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66410697,0.01056277,0.00821433,0.089705616,0.0041913805,0.0002419383,0.00006615058,0.00030186443,0.22260906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007577,0.004616414,0.0003291583,0.0011779375,0.0023472195,0.0014535415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99000883,0.006467835,0.0005131419,0.0011064961,0.0012463595,0.00065731764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010024988,0.00048629782,0.0007590754,0.0025451898,0.012258087,0.020307066,0.002029056,0.008905687,0.006287786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021998426,0.00056814007,0.00061247434,0.0015946393,0.04738538,0.0193639,0.011129934,0.018041138,0.0011661446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002273151,0.0000031970535,0.00003978169,0.000009321047,8.1775624e-7,0.000028974442,0.002405626,0.00003840412,0.000009486279,0.9847888,0.010385972,0.0022873995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000096067015,0.0000109138855,0.00017073996,0.00015718101,0.000002859359,0.00008952198,0.0036737719,0.00027123824,0.000104158564,0.5265167,0.46897584,0.000017471253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014094929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01822766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020747561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020747561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01183983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15053475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787708624","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0069","title":"The proper role of policy in private law adjudication","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Statutory law; Private law; Law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Politics; Law and economics; Opposition (politics); Sociology","score_opus":0.009596039025498703,"score_gpt":0.2588751311499375,"score_spread":0.24927909212443877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787708624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027061533,0.006229912,0.33022097,0.23585348,0.0015550586,0.00036249295,0.00013578002,0.00017624172,0.3984046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92440397,0.002688376,0.042713225,0.010485467,0.0010285082,0.00041145505,0.00004579798,0.00010900119,0.01811423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8859653,0.076287016,0.005908739,0.009175242,0.017776772,0.004887014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9087644,0.06758582,0.0042032474,0.010296274,0.0076902756,0.001460084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0845119,0.00062080973,0.0015185059,0.0023932855,0.0091117425,0.023629254,0.00330257,0.010898493,0.0031527577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08699067,0.0010683907,0.0009104013,0.0024149306,0.08264123,0.01874981,0.008788134,0.01401862,0.0011482353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029042783,0.0000042476886,0.000070706614,0.000013213169,0.0000017528633,0.000009681048,0.0007909188,0.00013120155,0.000031913034,0.9966613,0.00038131393,0.0019008717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001138807,0.000009980651,0.00014408567,0.000098716904,0.000005647593,0.000020243913,0.0005829068,0.0009501216,0.00028871448,0.98309845,0.014778405,0.00001129111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015052409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011030308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0845119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017636398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034398515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44694698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788281616","doi":"","title":"A Rudderless Regime: The United Kingdom's \"Enlightened Shareholder Value\" as a Model for the Duty of Loyalty in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Kingdom; Shareholder value; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Value (mathematics); Business; Shareholder; Accounting; Political science; Law; Finance; Corporate governance; Mathematics; Geology; Statistics","score_opus":0.03817949935838256,"score_gpt":0.3008976125834446,"score_spread":0.26271811322506206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788281616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06553776,0.0024193316,0.007237608,0.03663661,0.00019933234,0.000103765036,0.00011747157,0.000027412054,0.8877206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94138443,0.0010723554,0.0018960736,0.004306011,0.000040584615,0.000049890135,0.000029418032,0.000017389677,0.05120378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667776,0.0006657098,0.00006709435,0.00035523757,0.0009807806,0.0012533256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851626,0.00035390546,0.000102096856,0.00013660076,0.00055828464,0.0003328679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017550864,0.00029400678,0.0003630347,0.00095060776,0.01175213,0.010198589,0.0014437739,0.0039076456,0.0041208323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045148134,0.00032293765,0.00046243076,0.0009825082,0.015162117,0.0032410736,0.0031797406,0.0054898136,0.00037721172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004522892,0.000004026793,0.00022426483,0.00000525889,0.0000012051863,0.000043883825,0.00095984875,0.00023742225,0.000026420383,0.99528235,0.0015995991,0.0016111498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013048739,0.00004977375,0.006813884,0.00040155553,0.000055035856,0.00018995022,0.0075590713,0.007929264,0.0005083603,0.6740615,0.30214816,0.00015308615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9658216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96663207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09496488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09496488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07292641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6890216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788593743","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v11n1p62","title":"Interfering Busybody or Public-Minded Citizen? The Actio Popularis as a Model for Reform of the Rules of Standing in Constitutional Cases in Australia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Action (physics); Commonwealth; Enforcement; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.13865041830127536,"score_gpt":0.4030420231664005,"score_spread":0.26439160486512514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788593743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21258129,0.0016899813,0.03354061,0.0608413,0.00047023033,0.00023221347,0.00002218959,0.000059839087,0.69056237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96357185,0.0002628074,0.0038093105,0.0019643311,0.00010957784,0.00010212073,0.0000041501844,0.000017561604,0.03015825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938439,0.0038245139,0.00013691402,0.0005636012,0.0007545616,0.00087651383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976215,0.0010787047,0.0002507704,0.00034507574,0.0002883782,0.000415537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069164624,0.00021240054,0.00045277568,0.0008506337,0.0082419105,0.008345469,0.0013434746,0.0053228154,0.0039258525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078849755,0.0005025927,0.0005047315,0.00052519323,0.029161291,0.0074584265,0.0074839024,0.0076206983,0.00047742133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039902416,0.000015006085,0.000134796,0.0000070084907,0.000001279744,0.000086550615,0.003613526,0.00022825481,0.00009107325,0.9936166,0.0005460566,0.001655706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003966649,0.000089631234,0.0020383687,0.00015984042,0.000017850127,0.00018453364,0.0049185255,0.007095041,0.00038332792,0.8865615,0.09845585,0.00005584081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035918016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042964842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035918016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010776706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009719471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07819092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788845882","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada. Labour","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018778903237941274,"score_gpt":0.2650953110187141,"score_spread":0.24631640778077282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788845882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00143045,0.027541216,0.00038337018,0.019970005,0.001612311,0.00007548657,0.005796003,0.00016750144,0.9430237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016653657,0.009719492,0.00056804426,0.0048471447,0.00016146411,0.00003919696,0.0012403738,0.00010149306,0.96666914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763143,0.00009303771,0.00006555629,0.00015967892,0.0014409118,0.00060937036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986947,0.000121102305,0.000040358216,0.00005111341,0.00094635825,0.00014633524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006474226,0.0009346642,0.0005406049,0.0033552004,0.010407047,0.006924429,0.0016986561,0.0033457724,0.07476679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002676233,0.0006794827,0.0005539046,0.005001518,0.0029876656,0.0021798988,0.0014982575,0.0038812177,0.013738172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010488726,0.000012501033,0.00034271178,0.000085156156,0.000003136811,0.000055687906,0.000777006,0.0000685058,0.00005284653,0.109096035,0.8567956,0.032700427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021084109,0.0000015429347,0.0012268539,0.00010345101,0.0000027282001,0.00001588674,0.00036222924,0.000025008298,0.00003624103,0.0022965185,0.9959174,0.000010069108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99161947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07476679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06284417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12282282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4559685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788912459","doi":"","title":"Le droit français du mandat à effet posthume, une innovation attendue de la loi du 23 juin 2006, La revue du notariat, Montréal, septembre 2009, volume 111p.381 à 391. Domaine : Droit civil, droit comparé. Référencer revue avec comité de lecture","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0060688026526147425,"score_gpt":0.2132821068750658,"score_spread":0.20721330422245104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788912459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04094623,0.12239136,0.0037395572,0.28897858,0.009866868,0.000098403165,0.0023860582,0.00018588158,0.5314071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37190217,0.035549436,0.0031076388,0.021604516,0.001729024,0.00013678832,0.00078274624,0.0002329811,0.5649547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681264,0.00069713505,0.00009356491,0.00042861883,0.001304966,0.00066310074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980824,0.0005792584,0.00017863825,0.00015485779,0.00074681686,0.00025804967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026637462,0.00046898704,0.0003520989,0.0014750719,0.008386728,0.0050447057,0.0013081185,0.003946539,0.01600953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006087404,0.00038651563,0.0004892276,0.00245388,0.004434454,0.002814889,0.0020378917,0.0032061646,0.0016858163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012744733,0.000058734422,0.0027564077,0.0003171869,0.000048398244,0.00069227617,0.014537347,0.00027919476,0.0010341074,0.48091963,0.43646476,0.06276444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009167781,0.000013944113,0.007870945,0.00018752791,0.00001281077,0.00008884316,0.00089425914,0.000055316166,0.0005226856,0.006069447,0.98425066,0.000024316134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6463811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77894694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6463811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027288323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026200071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7114029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789720708","doi":"","title":"Ontario law reports [new series]: cases determined in the Court of Appeal and the High Court of Justice for Ontario.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; High Court; Political science; Economic Justice; Law of the case; Series (stratigraphy); Court of record; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.021645448539044033,"score_gpt":0.2535542562102732,"score_spread":0.23190880767122918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789720708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01583451,0.025257057,0.0007990023,0.05116957,0.005190557,0.00091814523,0.039128497,0.00043308322,0.86126965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054358236,0.013036735,0.0013421939,0.010380201,0.0013011737,0.00029461755,0.0107766725,0.00024706623,0.9082632],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958217,0.00012330645,0.00015389029,0.00015071702,0.0029871115,0.00076326623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308103,0.0011168676,0.0003629218,0.00019241187,0.0043123215,0.0009344353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017228904,0.0006808077,0.00031400926,0.0051363134,0.012206488,0.0047241435,0.0023385922,0.0034490987,0.039899282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091684265,0.001056003,0.0006409477,0.007923172,0.002315493,0.0014934103,0.0013135757,0.002119245,0.0051029283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011533511,0.00001171259,0.0009240722,0.000071020295,0.000004218483,0.00013052719,0.0006212104,0.000037510465,0.00008822954,0.005102995,0.98610026,0.006896557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018339444,0.000010183577,0.025311282,0.0001558111,0.000020607147,0.000076643664,0.0013049849,0.000089980334,0.00015405093,0.000881561,0.97194403,0.000032475233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065495774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065495774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.132785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47520733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789745396","doi":"","title":"La longue traversée vers le droit à réparation : La norme canadienne applicable aux acheteurs indirects","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Concurrences","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.035345145944439146,"score_gpt":0.2894811734474325,"score_spread":0.25413602750299336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789745396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0333306,0.009791729,0.024808485,0.14557685,0.0016055324,0.0001523833,0.00040794665,0.00013219244,0.78419423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6932916,0.0051864483,0.009238215,0.029264268,0.0005691507,0.0002900712,0.00012395755,0.00019924899,0.26183707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98224556,0.004435306,0.0010092573,0.0024837777,0.0061182273,0.0037078657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890352,0.0046883114,0.0004921336,0.0008075476,0.0043992028,0.00057758164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011200859,0.00063447794,0.0010194096,0.0015637573,0.024255605,0.021705408,0.0034647388,0.016117258,0.008259016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021321101,0.0008696959,0.00090950524,0.0026937143,0.044219844,0.00777292,0.005822728,0.01813082,0.0011749889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006398963,0.0000057472894,0.00027182625,0.00003403395,0.0000056763993,0.00011528633,0.012675663,0.00012138681,0.00006636077,0.9756329,0.008251882,0.0028129565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000313927,0.000027334057,0.0029269175,0.001020535,0.00006083748,0.00027394015,0.029968875,0.0005267604,0.00082089106,0.2597406,0.70444834,0.0001536416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87100154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.896622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12899846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051520824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11440572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37381148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789900073","doi":"10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4140","title":"Improving the Mechanism to Examine Judgment Debtor’s Ability to Satisfy Civil Judgments in Vietnam from International Experience","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VNU Journal of Science Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Enforcement; Sanctions; Civil procedure; Political science; Law; Commission; Business; Creditor; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.04979406834714484,"score_gpt":0.37247098971386183,"score_spread":0.322676921366717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789900073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7235026,0.001897206,0.005150365,0.016117034,0.00032494625,0.00068013906,0.00058778893,0.000049047994,0.25169078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773687,0.0011885151,0.0026086748,0.00195294,0.00005510779,0.00026160802,0.0003050008,0.000026667632,0.016232695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98952967,0.0053532626,0.00084161514,0.00068531424,0.0020440468,0.001546095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978373,0.007509612,0.0019335237,0.0012528988,0.008123034,0.0028080323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01916601,0.00019085173,0.00030229797,0.0019168804,0.0047125863,0.0048142695,0.00093122147,0.00063071423,0.009364163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03164776,0.00029997592,0.00022469943,0.002492806,0.0028280255,0.005147981,0.0034208423,0.0021592283,0.00075448543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012965548,0.00065282127,0.23614098,0.00063330843,0.000030621126,0.0021331315,0.43370754,0.00065560767,0.0011820401,0.07682255,0.051155236,0.19675657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037979244,0.00033845252,0.13160163,0.001448989,0.000040518786,0.0005481297,0.605376,0.0011800909,0.002261667,0.0082781585,0.24879171,0.00009679056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10704479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17537849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10704479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007523858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012225171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21284342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789986146","doi":"","title":"Canada's legal inheritances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.01349940512750042,"score_gpt":0.23674664981248614,"score_spread":0.22324724468498572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789986146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003334951,0.011700032,0.0003783706,0.04271719,0.0023301155,0.0000888057,0.0050090933,0.0002690399,0.93417233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026997456,0.0056697642,0.0006319002,0.006399546,0.00028802568,0.000038658476,0.0008100878,0.000094088806,0.9590705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963498,0.00009446969,0.000062638544,0.0001869321,0.0024801695,0.0008261049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681866,0.0002240396,0.00006204741,0.00013330257,0.0021881603,0.0005738034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012098345,0.00063659245,0.00063192094,0.003738799,0.014556932,0.010138859,0.0018384921,0.0037182288,0.06946805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052605825,0.00077934493,0.0006919595,0.005016388,0.0030851555,0.0018355804,0.0014896394,0.004865062,0.0070519396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000714934,0.000012586193,0.0004388849,0.000047339887,0.0000036322078,0.000057993253,0.00033371936,0.00008293068,0.00003434522,0.106517866,0.8700815,0.02238218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003317883,0.0000016975819,0.0011145938,0.00006235153,0.000003912465,0.000017464343,0.00019576779,0.00004809402,0.000027577515,0.0020100952,0.9965049,0.000010244663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99726605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0984425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0984425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28418508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71425366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790267939","doi":"10.29173/alr1369","title":"The Mere Busybody: Autonomy, Equality and Standing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Disadvantaged; Interdependence; Ideology; Law and economics; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0669137808131832,"score_gpt":0.348133299462869,"score_spread":0.28121951864968575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790267939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037523806,0.03824442,0.012099844,0.36568913,0.0011124538,0.000052959804,0.00006504123,0.000037536363,0.5451748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91102403,0.0071567777,0.0021893387,0.03517392,0.0016151364,0.00009160944,0.000031351767,0.000030286723,0.042687573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98830205,0.0057840124,0.0003552018,0.00090344,0.0030638948,0.0015913645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99293935,0.00455164,0.0006077271,0.00041908384,0.00076189794,0.0007202575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009111312,0.00026010608,0.0006726281,0.0013353748,0.0076322355,0.008552329,0.0015579225,0.008683399,0.004718517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012355054,0.0003013228,0.00049480813,0.0013931878,0.053737577,0.008619067,0.006259275,0.0074506355,0.0006363083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026034606,0.0000035754906,0.000124727,0.000009663294,0.0000011560414,0.000031479878,0.00087290973,0.000033998742,0.000015498286,0.99341327,0.0029459735,0.0025451693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010810349,0.000015876807,0.0010995347,0.00013354658,0.0000040541318,0.00007309526,0.0016365686,0.00013285124,0.00006174693,0.9151124,0.08170671,0.000012849426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026639916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029279273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026639916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007328247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010715487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053170383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790393806","doi":"10.29173/alr1273","title":"The Odhavji Decision: Old Ghosts and New Confusion in Canadian Courts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Supreme court; Law; Confusion; Estate; Statement (logic); Political science; Tort reform; Sociology; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.024076508577918744,"score_gpt":0.33201215652054084,"score_spread":0.30793564794262207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790393806","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08770406,0.058032386,0.0014431992,0.56199217,0.0021102447,0.00005904355,0.00031783074,0.00007024478,0.28827074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87669545,0.032400876,0.0017178616,0.044937983,0.0006824328,0.000019387247,0.000113726215,0.000049690127,0.043382663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909781,0.0011606192,0.00019187776,0.00064211973,0.00465998,0.002367251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927931,0.0020954565,0.00041714357,0.00016407615,0.003301357,0.0012288531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063988776,0.00036217552,0.0006382971,0.004551767,0.026385305,0.017004915,0.0024190396,0.0054881345,0.0036674317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0141350925,0.00041693504,0.00039303774,0.0061788578,0.025510479,0.0031095713,0.003041744,0.0061046695,0.00022951304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041000414,0.000015574844,0.0035512864,0.00013159505,0.000016037951,0.00055005366,0.019379033,0.0003885862,0.00021594792,0.8216927,0.10473394,0.04928428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054730142,0.000027220887,0.029647881,0.0010865695,0.00010495523,0.00032498347,0.051662892,0.0012658141,0.0004621335,0.13668267,0.7784215,0.00025865575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99389476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21141663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21141663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24649288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91464496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790421020","doi":"10.29173/alr2451","title":"Protecting Individual Self-Interest in Aggregate as the Basis of Fairness in Contract","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Mistake; Unconscionability; Regret; Law and economics; Welfare; Economics; Self-interest; Business; Contract theory; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.059609552485860355,"score_gpt":0.35015325888519466,"score_spread":0.2905437063993343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790421020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048289068,0.012019504,0.32020566,0.090779625,0.0010847523,0.00049943966,0.00016967367,0.00014790142,0.52680445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9197067,0.003910326,0.04865895,0.008764664,0.0011481475,0.0005193164,0.000048637463,0.00006993556,0.017173292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764608,0.009775401,0.0011368997,0.0025988056,0.007570063,0.002457976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98671734,0.0071667447,0.0013373755,0.002673578,0.0015957964,0.0005091452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030338066,0.00056479557,0.0015314973,0.001791639,0.0068473793,0.010028051,0.0029602833,0.010629766,0.0029320035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025625892,0.00069530803,0.0014287729,0.0015084824,0.043131165,0.010225856,0.0057649836,0.011042596,0.00060811907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022763618,0.000004270047,0.00005651396,0.000008510033,0.0000026756666,0.000013259559,0.00024107943,0.00029089133,0.00002358361,0.99775785,0.00026895586,0.0013302078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007896749,0.00001124658,0.0001624514,0.000066426845,0.000005941041,0.000025915839,0.00008974516,0.0007783933,0.00007357846,0.9902823,0.008486155,0.000009984284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011121053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008306071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030338066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008549163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015678484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16044492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791057227","doi":"","title":"Do Ontario School Boards Have Too Much Statutory Power? A Comparison of Expropriation and Eminent Domain in Ontario and Michigan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Eminent domain; Statutory law; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.02403258433258691,"score_gpt":0.29984578817834817,"score_spread":0.27581320384576125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791057227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6511643,0.00096564816,0.00043198484,0.020253386,0.00005506315,0.000081433645,0.00054596126,0.000026122327,0.32647628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98216414,0.00038464696,0.00015670825,0.0010213201,0.000019622046,0.00002634333,0.00009356807,0.000008885411,0.016124694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419314,0.0005344604,0.000120912926,0.00028531777,0.0019036366,0.0029625876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927187,0.0015351914,0.0015000522,0.00026120324,0.0019901004,0.0019946399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001759704,0.000133362,0.00027938242,0.0024340393,0.01451893,0.005031311,0.001418089,0.0015341633,0.010123796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009489316,0.00032465678,0.00033431046,0.0048029213,0.007955294,0.002225438,0.0026996378,0.0014727069,0.0003098377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028782294,0.00014444352,0.30716124,0.00019133046,0.00006894942,0.0017630468,0.093887284,0.0007734915,0.0016419399,0.51573807,0.037063465,0.041278914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006323827,0.00006389584,0.688798,0.00021394253,0.000086358355,0.00017817598,0.0950189,0.0007448078,0.0006474185,0.006618115,0.20748629,0.0000808196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10693057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10693057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07730933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7758392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791157503","doi":"10.29173/alr1411","title":"Caveat Emptor and the Sale of Land: The Erosion of a Doctrine","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Caveat emptor; Doctrine; Vendor; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.02088761539591849,"score_gpt":0.3152954154727956,"score_spread":0.2944078000768771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791157503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08240978,0.013103874,0.040037215,0.07917409,0.00060922664,0.00009873096,0.00012605118,0.00009597574,0.784345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9286268,0.00395711,0.0055661486,0.014033054,0.00050742796,0.00009709452,0.000040994477,0.000052103253,0.04711925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994827,0.001263235,0.0002337911,0.00066147605,0.0021650174,0.0008494825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896321,0.006826191,0.0008871414,0.001235443,0.001075393,0.00034357994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057557425,0.00023638834,0.00069909164,0.0012825815,0.0049429107,0.008017768,0.0024690293,0.009783917,0.0056292214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014162829,0.00048832403,0.0008080744,0.001612123,0.046400394,0.008022563,0.0055649457,0.010463125,0.00059092493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034757243,0.0000031552083,0.00016453129,0.000010136397,0.0000017256318,0.000091755544,0.00036033013,0.00007549268,0.00004484188,0.9962746,0.0011468148,0.00182308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003315429,0.000046811398,0.0013127904,0.00035316145,0.000017636834,0.0006906364,0.0015767771,0.00072868523,0.0003169983,0.8853617,0.10952441,0.000037242615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023960957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030404076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023960957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004542298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011660658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047642946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791426591","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Superior Court of Justice holds that communications between corporations and the Competition Bureau during the proffer stage of the immunity program or the leniency program should not be protected by settlement privilege (Nestlé Canada)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Stage (stratigraphy); Law and economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.08580636171020671,"score_gpt":0.32664526603790495,"score_spread":0.24083890432769822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791426591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023073718,0.0017232591,0.0014133735,0.082697876,0.0017968437,0.0005161799,0.0042303074,0.00023060698,0.8843178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13877508,0.0010598779,0.0018727423,0.045346525,0.0004388258,0.00020370509,0.0009127009,0.000091560956,0.811299],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906074,0.00037117596,0.00028492603,0.0005206347,0.005101843,0.0031140174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914743,0.0011262243,0.00026546052,0.00025233737,0.0055245347,0.0013571199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003420847,0.00048532162,0.00053631066,0.0013470023,0.020475117,0.006053458,0.001995137,0.009263908,0.019639067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00990775,0.001045125,0.00077884854,0.0018404408,0.003674434,0.0014055027,0.0016533139,0.0064098495,0.0045331717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005607982,0.00004517681,0.0044271275,0.000078688754,0.000015626869,0.00046597098,0.002877585,0.00015343021,0.000750217,0.18626313,0.7941068,0.010760228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004448842,0.000023928835,0.011543992,0.00012625643,0.000042900665,0.00008631284,0.0012991934,0.00034902536,0.00044959146,0.0033683076,0.9825889,0.000077123535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99586594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052552793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052552793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18062575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38129896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792390369","doi":"","title":"The common law basis of Aboriginal entitlements to land in Canada, the law's crooked path","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Path (computing); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0039002070609369644,"score_gpt":0.20694801895539944,"score_spread":0.20304781189446247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792390369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3030335,0.0027253383,0.0033067924,0.04319593,0.00014054704,0.00011809394,0.0005244089,0.00004208549,0.64691335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774016,0.00052670814,0.0005413661,0.0012933817,0.00002202464,0.000021020109,0.000043800184,0.000018937131,0.020131154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938836,0.00073700654,0.00014595965,0.0005190137,0.0016145457,0.0030999468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933113,0.0018648497,0.000347397,0.00038595116,0.0031898054,0.00090070977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037295138,0.00025064946,0.00075637415,0.0026039605,0.026181586,0.013115401,0.0025961157,0.0032688035,0.007353734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015364201,0.00045545478,0.00049389276,0.003918237,0.030002268,0.003019215,0.003629856,0.0043118456,0.00032145125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018547116,0.000021944461,0.0037440632,0.000020938274,0.00001696785,0.00018470324,0.015823575,0.00050232856,0.00011298406,0.96654695,0.006601606,0.0064054164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006181775,0.000039807623,0.07916165,0.0005495603,0.00017904198,0.000321529,0.11490077,0.004047843,0.00072526606,0.58154327,0.21823744,0.00023206575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09935022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09935022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.164939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7208397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792894764","doi":"","title":"By All Unlawful Means? An Inquiry into the Scope of the Unlawful Means Tort","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Tort; Law; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Liability; Legal certainty; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06812664938748614,"score_gpt":0.38641440689530343,"score_spread":0.3182877575078173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792894764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06278581,0.026493877,0.074698426,0.117109194,0.0004680479,0.00012282893,0.00010759815,0.00006755987,0.7181466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96362066,0.0050043846,0.006053291,0.012845357,0.0008051024,0.00023819013,0.000027476253,0.000048912538,0.01135652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98534507,0.0063623413,0.00061493146,0.0015455071,0.0047127753,0.0014193229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740424,0.019737506,0.0015426851,0.0021926875,0.0017253781,0.00075930683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015339465,0.0006073323,0.001076552,0.0024724961,0.006428358,0.012696519,0.0022003362,0.01097515,0.0018254025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019200124,0.000906786,0.0011508102,0.0012561949,0.055447347,0.014000586,0.0079693915,0.0128425965,0.00037754435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021142168,0.000005264823,0.000067648776,0.0000087636945,0.0000018959056,0.00003232294,0.00069545355,0.000094331524,0.00005480648,0.9976165,0.000345904,0.0010749475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004900184,0.000010159859,0.00023405725,0.0001293956,0.0000062713652,0.000064943684,0.0005130481,0.00030153454,0.0001406655,0.98524654,0.013337936,0.000010475452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064003845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056125824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015339465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006259157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00786022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08112383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793072605","doi":"10.29173/alr1295","title":"Making Sense of Juristic Reasons: Unjust Enrichment after Garland v. Consumers' Gas","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Supreme court; Law; Liability; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Restitution","score_opus":0.032022895671059405,"score_gpt":0.34557724581775,"score_spread":0.3135543501466906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793072605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049187947,0.04199932,0.0088875005,0.5361442,0.0028060416,0.00006791628,0.00007095849,0.0000552669,0.3607809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779892,0.0097671775,0.0022891888,0.080015875,0.0012721118,0.000047606685,0.0000279005,0.000047240304,0.028543746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871695,0.0052138823,0.00029630688,0.0008126144,0.004773753,0.0017338527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98936594,0.008140487,0.0004374365,0.00039455056,0.0013528825,0.0003087444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01504154,0.00034285258,0.0007189031,0.001531811,0.009478377,0.009609429,0.0018467491,0.0127823865,0.0015955209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016170181,0.00039878578,0.00066858926,0.0015079913,0.038557034,0.00569844,0.0042163585,0.012358156,0.00021941151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008125203,0.0000072770945,0.00023882769,0.0000272499,0.000006536297,0.00023930738,0.004272223,0.0001084059,0.000082535145,0.9829047,0.0072457143,0.0048590694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037597623,0.00003383636,0.0023780214,0.00041134376,0.00004704017,0.00012067378,0.00998636,0.00033011008,0.0007100087,0.691614,0.29427207,0.000058960748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21302675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41301683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78697324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0217957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026903376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4235736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793158076","doi":"10.7202/1043449ar","title":"LA PORTÉE DE L’ARTICLE 1275 DU CODE CIVIL DU QUÉBEC À L’ÉGARD DU FIDUCIAIRE","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016264742648930984,"score_gpt":0.25005387768728626,"score_spread":0.23378913503835527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793158076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024358938,0.010079608,0.0074098897,0.16174883,0.0110445,0.00041769844,0.0034417135,0.00052291737,0.78097594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17821434,0.0027926068,0.006413181,0.06605097,0.0009869095,0.00028258943,0.00083373394,0.0002600341,0.74416566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782384,0.001599999,0.00041388505,0.0009509329,0.006771175,0.0024401085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98794925,0.0031151746,0.0003853158,0.00073935103,0.006868142,0.0009426815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054259524,0.0006917208,0.0005782149,0.0014868092,0.010448172,0.007247333,0.0017501102,0.011624269,0.021920184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015694786,0.00074238825,0.0011353062,0.0017495597,0.0051822076,0.0018627297,0.0017625056,0.0108527215,0.0037072932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006453373,0.000056492965,0.0025119793,0.00016525188,0.000024663972,0.0004360705,0.0046498105,0.00045173298,0.001453192,0.38748336,0.5743561,0.028346926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014875018,0.000017217762,0.006530998,0.00016192347,0.000014770496,0.00008357735,0.0008101379,0.00027390555,0.0005427888,0.004268777,0.9872241,0.00005695856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96541536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.975211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0536303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0536303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107601605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38911688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793500892","doi":"","title":"The long crossing to the right of compensation: The Canadian rule for indirect purchasers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Compensation (psychology); Normative; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.061994080708448786,"score_gpt":0.37225255675714825,"score_spread":0.31025847604869944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793500892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018008014,0.037834905,0.0108576855,0.29948246,0.0036309117,0.00017776527,0.0009951981,0.00010934695,0.6289037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57135135,0.021804404,0.013065838,0.21268617,0.0027132311,0.00025128236,0.0005100724,0.00019284907,0.17742477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9680876,0.002381916,0.0010377393,0.003411739,0.019265363,0.0058155833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98558307,0.0050045922,0.0004578146,0.0006526254,0.0073419125,0.00095995696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012770135,0.00076168316,0.0013424277,0.0030816053,0.019516528,0.015298228,0.0049654483,0.016557097,0.0051341867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025743872,0.0010038065,0.0012867673,0.0037290833,0.02495843,0.0046804184,0.003272657,0.02342083,0.000768643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068427667,0.000005984029,0.00038139964,0.000055260338,0.000011753561,0.0000991955,0.0016872494,0.00013027519,0.00008177307,0.9462307,0.04498124,0.006328347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005092595,0.000020690031,0.0046786508,0.001352471,0.00012060031,0.00019874376,0.00256015,0.00064006954,0.0004941694,0.2301998,0.7594592,0.000224563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98580694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08019844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08019844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22275513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5818831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794621684","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Court holds that information received by the Competition Bureau at the proffer stage of its immunity and leniency programs is not protected from disclosure to other accused persons by settlement privilege (R / Nestlé Canada)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Competition (biology); Law; Political science; Stage (stratigraphy); Business; Finance","score_opus":0.032469389434262655,"score_gpt":0.26394266478290906,"score_spread":0.23147327534864642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794621684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023273734,0.0008722645,0.0016801974,0.11558879,0.0023990949,0.0006114836,0.004080122,0.00062410027,0.8508703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08041964,0.0004941264,0.0021597152,0.12809435,0.00041358473,0.0002781872,0.0008700454,0.00013832284,0.78713197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98462903,0.0007005238,0.0005683869,0.0012334964,0.0072867163,0.0055818115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863464,0.0038761871,0.0003416016,0.0006280053,0.0070153456,0.0017923915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006360918,0.00093423284,0.0011363887,0.002298276,0.03131321,0.012467934,0.004309721,0.028537132,0.03133731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018520951,0.0022866586,0.0020742342,0.0021105502,0.005057512,0.0027316916,0.002433326,0.014834331,0.008882301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007545674,0.0001411862,0.0033427654,0.0000632186,0.000039835893,0.000433966,0.002111325,0.00026406415,0.0009482256,0.23486288,0.7471341,0.010582914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013638921,0.00007386457,0.013696265,0.00019770539,0.00017165317,0.00016926564,0.0029251305,0.0011678278,0.0016291101,0.0099103125,0.96959734,0.00032515542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97788405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039636753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039636753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18350258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2875861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795436897","doi":"","title":"THE DUTY TO TAKE CARE AND LIABILITY FOR THE ACT OF THE THINGS IN COMPARATIVE LAW","year":2007,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Law; Liability; Tort; Duty of care; Common law; Delict; Political science; Comparative law; History; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.02923578739723541,"score_gpt":0.32379871994610354,"score_spread":0.2945629325488681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795436897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008243254,0.0786319,0.010171523,0.42471337,0.0032237577,0.0000949914,0.00033516725,0.00005793831,0.47452813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6994468,0.05068324,0.018108029,0.096207894,0.0044832067,0.00049170584,0.0002814228,0.00015883807,0.13013892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889915,0.0056828614,0.0006392765,0.00072052825,0.0029165912,0.0010493282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987751,0.008326649,0.0006601287,0.0007163617,0.002094071,0.00045175478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011012916,0.0004877816,0.00076905766,0.0016914924,0.008057634,0.006595259,0.001948252,0.015618858,0.0055599264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0221506,0.0006303329,0.0006576962,0.0016739467,0.02603706,0.009322635,0.003540013,0.009844407,0.0014105325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070780084,0.000008012391,0.00008868245,0.000028645465,0.000001783678,0.000040737377,0.0014637262,0.00004593959,0.000028542932,0.96141064,0.032966483,0.0039098524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028617715,0.000017899678,0.0011625261,0.00064085354,0.000014053464,0.00014675966,0.0023587695,0.00020379505,0.00017468575,0.7712031,0.22401355,0.000035435012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04445218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052551314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04445218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081605315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011984683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08838689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795542233","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment; a digest of decisions of the Provincial and Dominion courts, including appeals therefrom to the Privy [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Political science; Law; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.028500963277824823,"score_gpt":0.2744876459327224,"score_spread":0.2459866826548976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795542233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037675113,0.05748065,0.0010761719,0.15364365,0.009431926,0.00024434508,0.013198938,0.00040585667,0.76075107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016868211,0.008954154,0.0009535875,0.015002688,0.00054319034,0.000050095117,0.001461207,0.00015888194,0.956008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981148,0.000079186306,0.00003226303,0.00008548847,0.0013326362,0.0003555863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834955,0.00016651925,0.000038355607,0.000045312634,0.0011738255,0.00022644545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097511866,0.0007364699,0.00036015047,0.002253383,0.0141579965,0.0048504267,0.001490972,0.0034742216,0.045217313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036312721,0.000598442,0.00053468876,0.004098049,0.002724774,0.0016592204,0.0008915063,0.0030638583,0.008302737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049040964,0.0000031467378,0.00009907706,0.000020365665,9.0714764e-7,0.000017161701,0.0002283801,0.000017601951,0.000038797578,0.0066263233,0.988172,0.0047712554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023566936,0.0000016292611,0.0019347763,0.000049077185,0.0000029913704,0.000014169197,0.0005659,0.000029241759,0.00007319868,0.000954041,0.99636084,0.000011957941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06024931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11916243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43714142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796058516","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Superior Court holds that presumptions that by possessing documents, persons and firms are deemed to know their contents are unconstitutionnal in a criminal context (Durward)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Possession (linguistics); Law; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Competition law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Collusion; History","score_opus":0.04486810574890933,"score_gpt":0.2987878819149554,"score_spread":0.2539197761660461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796058516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029023271,0.001434574,0.0017053379,0.08347133,0.0017164052,0.00040588988,0.004178252,0.00022162872,0.8778434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11986596,0.0012902147,0.0026244356,0.056123983,0.00043955317,0.00019820758,0.0008113833,0.000102798236,0.81854343],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900041,0.00038940972,0.00036773813,0.0008070338,0.00552029,0.0029114017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896254,0.0027000797,0.00042162684,0.00060628075,0.005370784,0.0012758104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038394602,0.0005932107,0.000769785,0.0020757765,0.03182822,0.011019681,0.002999431,0.013979997,0.02324016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013800057,0.0017403216,0.0014240281,0.0034307663,0.007705296,0.0024288022,0.0021402666,0.009620677,0.0037897953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009739082,0.000069715476,0.0058606723,0.00013802401,0.000040163985,0.0006475073,0.005224118,0.00030323336,0.0010808867,0.42918566,0.5442133,0.0131393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009090424,0.000027740942,0.016392581,0.00023114905,0.00011657796,0.00012766068,0.003058642,0.0005887453,0.00088838005,0.00954524,0.9687659,0.00016649424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99843067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07021392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07021392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2274383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50944006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796292634","doi":"10.29173/alr1331","title":"Civil Procedure and Practice: Recent Developments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Civil procedure; Apportionment; Substantive law; Focus (optics); Procedural law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.04160276071165178,"score_gpt":0.36642476051991424,"score_spread":0.32482199980826243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796292634","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016593458,0.87429804,0.002013757,0.06925467,0.0015664374,0.000014787147,0.000030448622,0.0000311657,0.051131412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06267114,0.8993462,0.0027298704,0.018593438,0.007902657,0.000025397452,0.000056041936,0.00003168082,0.00864364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928387,0.0021621787,0.00037897273,0.000888513,0.0031851742,0.00054643786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783279,0.014252107,0.0014287551,0.0006039215,0.004245465,0.0011418181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009573626,0.00048687175,0.0006767678,0.0043703234,0.0024161658,0.010261549,0.0016860137,0.007101843,0.010747567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015252396,0.0005494069,0.0004383587,0.0072499784,0.019059995,0.0069994824,0.0027166826,0.007791219,0.0017497295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003803151,0.00006961458,0.00075083866,0.002194717,0.00001144174,0.00016252325,0.0012657106,0.00074590277,0.00017360107,0.5417724,0.0408531,0.4119622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081634125,0.0000383974,0.0033595797,0.0020603368,0.000007904649,0.00037088076,0.00095567486,0.00021738987,0.00010051023,0.048438773,0.94441897,0.000023402547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056589473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06529435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056589473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021839965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022266982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15846074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796895794","doi":"10.29173/alr1306","title":"The Accidental Consistency: Extracting a Coherent Principle from the Jurisprudence Surrounding Solicitor Client Privilege between the Police and the Crown","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Jurisprudence; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; CLARITY; Legislation; Accidental; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030443105785296565,"score_gpt":0.3481412483199762,"score_spread":0.31769814253467965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796895794","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03234176,0.004924238,0.48117614,0.22474378,0.0015265115,0.0004721873,0.00015609071,0.00017849238,0.25448078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82250583,0.0017700571,0.12960029,0.027670944,0.0011705972,0.0007867483,0.000087680775,0.00012729125,0.016280573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9692578,0.016940618,0.0019195393,0.0024696183,0.00767872,0.0017337737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710025,0.017594717,0.0027447096,0.0038886608,0.0038619093,0.0009074712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03304096,0.00043401422,0.00103043,0.002178697,0.0060802824,0.010372037,0.0034964187,0.011816333,0.0013695641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04505191,0.0009907349,0.0013350924,0.0016130927,0.059278287,0.010522908,0.009067086,0.015341084,0.000518619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018271295,0.000003771795,0.00010620398,0.00001699343,0.0000025939987,0.000029544619,0.0007510105,0.00008403093,0.000034863268,0.99649423,0.0008808936,0.0015939998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013012599,0.000022620132,0.0003851974,0.00010110634,0.000007673173,0.00009168102,0.00058916095,0.000481751,0.00015229506,0.9779138,0.020226462,0.000015288404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006101557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006855183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03304096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063566724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02265064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17473936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799918838","doi":"","title":"THE CANADIAN DEFAMATION ACTION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Liability; Law; Cause of action; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Action (physics); Business; History","score_opus":0.1280207382448755,"score_gpt":0.39891407069006696,"score_spread":0.2708933324451914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799918838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5488035,0.01879287,0.0012665483,0.032459684,0.00040047814,0.00046767667,0.022347292,0.00014858742,0.37531337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93031543,0.0072648767,0.0010910236,0.00270911,0.00007974569,0.00010453752,0.002735753,0.000043281132,0.05565613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913428,0.000428395,0.00019274116,0.00060874375,0.00595066,0.0014766138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842429,0.0022982485,0.0022982694,0.0004729838,0.008936831,0.0017506685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029110378,0.00026771525,0.00037945292,0.0065105055,0.009289185,0.003958134,0.001227038,0.0011539381,0.0077063343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014742971,0.0003008856,0.00044526492,0.011431389,0.0023133175,0.0009172301,0.0014781646,0.0015011801,0.0005942072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002360838,0.00010291022,0.3506641,0.0009666732,0.00010746346,0.0013168777,0.06683667,0.0010420738,0.0014717919,0.09254231,0.24462149,0.24009155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007637908,0.000025243433,0.5920873,0.0002683256,0.000034628683,0.00033319948,0.01815458,0.00030175934,0.00046642957,0.00081373344,0.3874194,0.00008781514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99322456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99586403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087375514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087375514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10504204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6339567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800282355","doi":"","title":"Fiery Foundations of Federalism: The Enduring Legacy of Citizens Insurance Co v Parsons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Federal jurisdiction; Federalism; Legislative history; History; Politics","score_opus":0.036016540194533896,"score_gpt":0.3541027533810449,"score_spread":0.31808621318651104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800282355","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03806257,0.012207818,0.0017776878,0.6623321,0.0019389794,0.000028780363,0.00011407969,0.000059906997,0.28347796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8400827,0.006026039,0.0006506685,0.1003592,0.0019248928,0.00003346956,0.00006159877,0.0000741837,0.050787304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248564,0.001296295,0.00010561608,0.0010519053,0.002027856,0.0030325584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923658,0.0036908023,0.00045504337,0.000541915,0.0015384041,0.0014079933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080483025,0.00020206122,0.00039938383,0.0011201997,0.029829971,0.01442968,0.0019684068,0.011106187,0.004180695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016055673,0.0005794874,0.0003850552,0.0011639827,0.049865417,0.0062022265,0.0042507886,0.017124576,0.00035947864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001691332,0.000008307932,0.0005960491,0.000014717983,0.0000074169598,0.00028734567,0.009218557,0.00015831445,0.0000642724,0.92690766,0.055747576,0.006972828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043376764,0.000025163414,0.0044347905,0.00032340692,0.00003172973,0.00022869777,0.011371858,0.0006620355,0.00041888718,0.2785181,0.7038315,0.00011045168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88345265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9331986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88345265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088974506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07489554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64555824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803669274","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3256","title":"Jurisdiction Motions and Access to Justice: An Ontario Tale","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Subject-matter jurisdiction","score_opus":0.05337845899815491,"score_gpt":0.37127220465974176,"score_spread":0.31789374566158685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803669274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5195087,0.009371189,0.0051489538,0.06735759,0.00026735713,0.00015128174,0.00079631555,0.000038438302,0.39736018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663616,0.0039864997,0.00083489006,0.0024115404,0.00006794807,0.000023024939,0.00013123751,0.000018057408,0.02616505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946861,0.0005404582,0.00015830695,0.00037342633,0.002392996,0.0018487258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507153,0.001359659,0.0011440609,0.00023350673,0.0015245657,0.00066664384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025609646,0.00017558981,0.0002824062,0.0021813668,0.014438478,0.0053999787,0.0013229336,0.001359096,0.00665442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009013271,0.00031641757,0.0004654548,0.003851564,0.01528437,0.003560081,0.0040825503,0.0016114155,0.00022399996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012696613,0.00004264123,0.14530976,0.0003962763,0.00007557275,0.0025524884,0.14786114,0.0019384956,0.0014470448,0.6047632,0.033140782,0.062345613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024299596,0.0000618384,0.28834105,0.0007104099,0.00009967965,0.00048929657,0.14124501,0.0010535009,0.0005599994,0.047115482,0.5201445,0.00015492359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97861403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99339867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0837527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0837527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07672897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804810499","doi":"","title":"Reynolds V Times Newspapers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Newspaper; Political science; Doctrine; Reputation; Common law; Duty","score_opus":0.011108891139427774,"score_gpt":0.30247503267494974,"score_spread":0.291366141535522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804810499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059422557,0.0036822257,0.00023424196,0.033431936,0.0055552437,0.00003395384,0.0003919808,0.00016755244,0.9505607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05916565,0.0018720431,0.0001854356,0.041037403,0.0029701348,0.00004629073,0.00021984763,0.0001964112,0.89430666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978364,0.0003084281,0.00010419078,0.00032741387,0.0009195992,0.0005040031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732554,0.0012341284,0.0002393817,0.0002998662,0.0005263955,0.0003747119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082764565,0.00038186266,0.0002667608,0.0013735997,0.006367714,0.008156068,0.00080369826,0.005846398,0.08385272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075828806,0.000558682,0.00040135076,0.001041317,0.0016496032,0.003914686,0.0019049349,0.0050387545,0.02000154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000458446,0.000023631885,0.00055273547,0.00011273282,0.000008331606,0.0014809245,0.0012467834,0.000032345528,0.00046382772,0.18397039,0.7869015,0.025161041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036943022,0.000009718211,0.00046448252,0.000052905492,0.0000027968968,0.00018333823,0.00023373608,0.0000142904855,0.00019100175,0.001451153,0.9973834,0.000009378589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023879007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051123284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08385272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032615794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002490675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2805153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805016895","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3255","title":"Six of One, Half a Dozen of the Other? Jurisdiction in Common Law Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Dozen; Law; Nova scotia; Common law; Statute; Political science; Choice of law; Civil law (Civil law); Geography; Public law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02106967937403747,"score_gpt":0.28313572769290785,"score_spread":0.26206604831887037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805016895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21335413,0.006282203,0.0036312097,0.1000163,0.0010653321,0.00010418061,0.0007349232,0.00011518201,0.67469656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884962,0.001687888,0.00087013934,0.008983036,0.000090141686,0.000021489039,0.00015454044,0.0000315388,0.09966507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704546,0.00022601963,0.00005745328,0.00034527507,0.0008487964,0.001477092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967713,0.00027228374,0.00011611966,0.00011231329,0.00094348134,0.0017845948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011538442,0.00014930216,0.00031648154,0.0008642639,0.017947197,0.005073594,0.0010166721,0.0018135726,0.015584592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043430333,0.00020581971,0.00028601353,0.0015931543,0.008705312,0.0028571535,0.002833358,0.0027210515,0.00095517386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053551863,0.00004506836,0.023865128,0.00008210694,0.000027394191,0.0005797445,0.022353666,0.0004163293,0.00055342354,0.77401894,0.11404542,0.063959375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024736948,0.000029088464,0.038101654,0.000268329,0.0000418035,0.0004308118,0.050387252,0.00075391005,0.00034488976,0.059639562,0.8498671,0.00011092433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97443163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98856145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035863444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035863444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07580125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26020873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805636555","doi":"10.1017/s0268416018000085","title":"James Muir, <i>Law, debt, and merchant power: the civil courts of eighteenth-century Halifax</i> (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016). Pages xvi + 286. $70/$34.95 hardback and ebook. JamesMuir, Law, debt, and merchant power: the civil courts of eighteenth-century Halifax (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016). Pages xvi + 286. $70/$34.95 hardback and ebook.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Continuity and Change","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Law; Political science; Power (physics); Business; Finance; Physics","score_opus":0.01986276004927923,"score_gpt":0.2403215951156515,"score_spread":0.22045883506637226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805636555","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001309625,0.7723916,0.00023580086,0.13430691,0.0023487553,0.000012699042,0.00032539433,0.000035644225,0.08903355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067291446,0.6923804,0.0007719491,0.019636113,0.00436627,0.00004413217,0.00031653245,0.00011063118,0.21508247],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928766,0.0002066636,0.00002957214,0.000066269065,0.00029502015,0.00011486885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991862,0.00037874602,0.000091557034,0.00001980715,0.00017684807,0.00014675882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009250041,0.0010324075,0.0004292545,0.0020642783,0.0046399427,0.0056354706,0.0014248901,0.004019356,0.03146378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016538122,0.000630199,0.00024022153,0.0037383635,0.0063173124,0.00884414,0.0015093992,0.0034621896,0.004610747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024117195,0.000012740154,0.0004307849,0.00031318303,0.000006567106,0.00008320239,0.005580675,0.00005694015,0.00006446216,0.046889734,0.92170554,0.024831986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010551883,0.000008017396,0.0049290676,0.0011807422,0.000009560537,0.00011263406,0.0100260535,0.000046629877,0.00012262863,0.024205467,0.9593213,0.000027396296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32049805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57682085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67950195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015860612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008202944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6372651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806922772","doi":"","title":"La bonne foi et la common law : L’arrêt Bhasin c. Hrynew (Good Faith and the Common Law: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Bhasin v Hrynew)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Common law; Political science; Obligation; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00947501948766091,"score_gpt":0.28983918546824394,"score_spread":0.28036416598058306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806922772","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024400521,0.028195987,0.00141724,0.69678426,0.0044666966,0.00009308551,0.00033622264,0.00003807695,0.24426791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4522086,0.009354518,0.0011869838,0.2897951,0.001621144,0.000083153405,0.0001102148,0.0000872875,0.24555306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476236,0.0009136472,0.00010219577,0.0006450769,0.00168358,0.0018931363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730444,0.0010282019,0.000121743746,0.0000749937,0.0009107448,0.00055981724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034296776,0.0004152946,0.00041785938,0.0007382839,0.023936938,0.011609179,0.0019842254,0.011780635,0.0068037636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051797125,0.0005060823,0.0004338595,0.0012011457,0.014888883,0.0028711476,0.002983802,0.013269161,0.0006121992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029856485,0.000016089201,0.0011112646,0.00007362034,0.000015772985,0.00069045613,0.009121007,0.00020549586,0.00042165854,0.6904012,0.28955874,0.008354889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029796623,0.000018168665,0.00493975,0.00037563292,0.000026455782,0.00017856572,0.008513977,0.0003998994,0.0004620423,0.038110014,0.9468085,0.0001371658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9734403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07545825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07545825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08039751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5474905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809097328","doi":"","title":"CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND THE CONCEPT OF LOYALTY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Duty; Plaintiff; Duty of loyalty; Fiduciary; Law; Political science; Sociology; Advertising; Business; Law and economics","score_opus":0.08262759396344879,"score_gpt":0.3401623697814748,"score_spread":0.257534775818026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809097328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016746316,0.21540673,0.011201092,0.3051187,0.0026571404,0.00016468464,0.00013224229,0.000017053753,0.44855613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80121493,0.078630954,0.0052692806,0.08287844,0.0056738616,0.00031909734,0.00014487484,0.000027065056,0.025841532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97293437,0.01357016,0.0013107271,0.001601601,0.00828249,0.0023006632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742804,0.015804669,0.002988012,0.0007364043,0.004401446,0.0017889986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015962679,0.0003871082,0.00052509084,0.005053293,0.0064948564,0.008744115,0.0020841546,0.0081151575,0.0038508542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029708369,0.00034601387,0.00044120225,0.0036083488,0.048240263,0.0070844707,0.0054045236,0.008768054,0.00040803885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017727613,0.0000049807636,0.00030782173,0.000034701883,0.0000028868208,0.000071782495,0.0008456819,0.00003320761,0.000009944248,0.9903171,0.004041102,0.0043290323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011101717,0.0000213603,0.0018755702,0.0010723106,0.000012096489,0.00071092875,0.0029591161,0.00023258198,0.00004503096,0.7995495,0.19347948,0.00003094782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031406537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034152262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031406537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016439484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02050688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11927736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809276071","doi":"10.7202/1048585ar","title":"L’examen critique des gages spéciaux : révélations autour de ces techniques d’appropriation directe de la valeur","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.016043705454347686,"score_gpt":0.3120133573599545,"score_spread":0.2959696519056068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809276071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13277721,0.009826781,0.054908957,0.037240434,0.0009111766,0.00027637611,0.00018042578,0.00022236901,0.7636563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74110353,0.0040092813,0.019354109,0.0061206226,0.00020065783,0.00020067696,0.00007452439,0.00023893925,0.22869773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989122,0.0034052513,0.00027320036,0.0014296189,0.0048788586,0.0008910424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879325,0.0050854785,0.00080902124,0.002143374,0.0036325774,0.00039717613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009411562,0.0006836212,0.00037527524,0.0018772259,0.009223146,0.010450617,0.0021302619,0.0037170332,0.008569104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016976347,0.00060134626,0.00048107913,0.0021599887,0.028384285,0.0055086,0.003542901,0.005283248,0.001274043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032142416,0.000024177136,0.0025758736,0.00024398793,0.000021162094,0.00026663227,0.082911976,0.00056343415,0.0015226533,0.83356947,0.010860027,0.06740861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015496835,0.00005620039,0.007183611,0.00082111376,0.00003006306,0.0003418209,0.03675982,0.0007232109,0.0024140852,0.04098378,0.91060597,0.000064714084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2641061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45066917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2641061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02072513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020326855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52513766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810323610","doi":"10.21991/cf29360","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legitimacy; Legitimation; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0191935199108331,"score_gpt":0.2674869927135426,"score_spread":0.2482934728027095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810323610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09534869,0.0094855875,0.013472182,0.12479654,0.0009974665,0.00012066196,0.00038968422,0.00015596632,0.7552333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547364,0.00147471,0.0022367693,0.0071713333,0.00024951558,0.00004773788,0.00007823507,0.000064652086,0.033940785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98195523,0.0025043685,0.00041181402,0.0019223443,0.007605533,0.0056006704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988971,0.004366795,0.00041011485,0.00089836115,0.0042517893,0.001101926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011051426,0.00036768944,0.0008389937,0.002479414,0.031987607,0.025248973,0.0035327629,0.010617015,0.004889348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026252009,0.0005916099,0.00061008334,0.0034851166,0.039771616,0.0058555985,0.0064950045,0.015101552,0.00034248587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036677498,0.0000028555642,0.00025736488,0.000005980056,0.0000052170167,0.00007037689,0.0027117913,0.0001386383,0.000045426954,0.9907864,0.0038516992,0.002120573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004553293,0.000014332533,0.004149749,0.00030086105,0.00007833844,0.00009760819,0.0075213583,0.0023490877,0.0007351755,0.69058585,0.29396772,0.00015437284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9469619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9491044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12572734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12572734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16055213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810376421","doi":"10.7202/1045920ar","title":"LA COPROPRIÉTÉ DIVISE DU CODE CIVIL DU QUÉBEC DEPUIS LE 1 JANVIER 1994","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01761644105646872,"score_gpt":0.2456391896521657,"score_spread":0.22802274859569696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810376421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033805538,0.03644741,0.004676231,0.086401686,0.014501195,0.0010686737,0.020754358,0.0005627649,0.80178213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083023936,0.0058293734,0.0019537234,0.008539138,0.0005485554,0.00030314882,0.0025885259,0.00012360245,0.89709014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949392,0.00037355235,0.00016261563,0.00045100844,0.0028696125,0.0012040582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99324095,0.00063360773,0.0002560963,0.00025686724,0.0051383255,0.00047417637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022182602,0.000647294,0.0005352568,0.0016400777,0.0057981103,0.0037415738,0.0013306133,0.003753375,0.028729284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077313334,0.00055603986,0.0006061404,0.0019451446,0.0018933887,0.0010345205,0.0010104731,0.004332872,0.003852363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008736411,0.000055227534,0.0045815506,0.00023120249,0.000034225915,0.0003052461,0.0020954434,0.00047326702,0.0012693112,0.12113525,0.81395596,0.05577592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012906635,0.000013902331,0.010224873,0.00012795789,0.000009840918,0.000038810496,0.0002397616,0.000108322136,0.0003446029,0.00062947103,0.988223,0.000026545024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9883486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061369523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061369523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11456662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44526917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810685468","doi":"10.7202/1045636ar","title":"LA LOI SUR LA CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE NATUREL : UN SIMPLE APERÇU DES MESURES DE PROTECTION ÉDICTÉES ET DE LEUR IMPACT SUR LA PRATIQUE NOTARIALE","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.019145444702021615,"score_gpt":0.30900152425422134,"score_spread":0.2898560795521997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810685468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06184197,0.08404256,0.041060667,0.31544647,0.0045898245,0.00021595447,0.0004877856,0.00027967675,0.4920352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7343151,0.033913936,0.029405938,0.03189481,0.0042329286,0.00034121747,0.00019135566,0.00016717162,0.16553757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902407,0.0024525546,0.00045658572,0.0010259639,0.0049768114,0.0008473579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99085194,0.0050701136,0.001287882,0.0007923325,0.0015663743,0.000431407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007653584,0.0005801611,0.000835632,0.0017353122,0.0041699237,0.0070275334,0.002184067,0.0074907807,0.012106668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01586085,0.0004432979,0.0006463194,0.0016667648,0.016652502,0.006592816,0.0074286326,0.008144064,0.0013480271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007102244,0.000089856236,0.0030533585,0.00063390296,0.000046080208,0.00031519565,0.0041482965,0.0013233816,0.0027710143,0.83450675,0.038187165,0.114854045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045047367,0.0002963325,0.0124762915,0.0018007241,0.00007280306,0.0008961358,0.002491154,0.0011225984,0.0027251155,0.3093943,0.6685336,0.00014592467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01564804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026984345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01564804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055442196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009089941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04050082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811147922","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198795568.003.0023","title":"Criticism and Reform Proposals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Criticism; Reform Act; Uniform Commercial Code; Property (philosophy); Law; Law reform; Personal property; Security interest; Law and economics; Code (set theory); Business; Political science; Accounting; Public administration; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.036167328589568365,"score_gpt":0.2612551530985508,"score_spread":0.22508782450898243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811147922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046206834,0.011581613,0.0041571283,0.6694419,0.009928781,0.00010010465,0.00007635646,0.00008415455,0.30000928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2423046,0.015046562,0.007236342,0.44411102,0.013732146,0.00055071485,0.00020421855,0.00039701356,0.27641737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785404,0.010561378,0.00059079163,0.0018522048,0.0071774437,0.0012777519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820228,0.011265014,0.00057671004,0.0016205963,0.003953227,0.0005616629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024338154,0.00084679853,0.00079570373,0.0032551263,0.005881732,0.00921397,0.0044663334,0.013625455,0.013288673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050307754,0.00044091739,0.0009090079,0.0028662032,0.03123259,0.011696935,0.0053652935,0.01977109,0.0026848263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004687551,0.000013347109,0.000028096621,0.00003627342,0.0000021799801,0.000036708843,0.0013674696,0.00011627005,0.00003216649,0.9539793,0.04034474,0.004038797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022928907,0.00001230385,0.00014394862,0.00044093712,0.000007099468,0.000058748734,0.001968788,0.00045394973,0.00013811557,0.29302955,0.7037054,0.000018312276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010358552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007602181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024338154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020077849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008656785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14567566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811151482","doi":"10.7202/1046103ar","title":"RÉFLEXION SUR LE « LIVING WILL » DE COMMON LAW DANS LE CONTEXTE DU DROIT CIVIL QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017815562669066542,"score_gpt":0.24811100906305358,"score_spread":0.23029544639398705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811151482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.111919865,0.01253119,0.006499214,0.26256236,0.0006556535,0.000048759564,0.00016717242,0.000026837472,0.605589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560171,0.0016584416,0.00078929454,0.009323714,0.00015095047,0.000024972771,0.000023620509,0.000012193563,0.031999715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961027,0.0015942907,0.000057411544,0.0003828997,0.0007951917,0.0010675486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580234,0.0019130947,0.00028872254,0.00018864647,0.0011434209,0.00066381646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062488616,0.00030907444,0.00042329318,0.0015242072,0.012829526,0.009277414,0.0014971165,0.004248045,0.004748173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005464152,0.00017418488,0.00031826796,0.0015741166,0.03973783,0.0035842683,0.0035138284,0.004832661,0.00025240876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023609575,0.0000031729037,0.0002989595,0.00000880921,0.0000024459328,0.00006294263,0.005660392,0.0001124558,0.000026028541,0.98849535,0.0039953943,0.0013316742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024669265,0.00001796479,0.0067495084,0.0007439499,0.0000272756,0.00014112573,0.035364717,0.0016264911,0.00023464998,0.58434755,0.37065548,0.00006666651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85754764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87125224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14245236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052805588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05282935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38313317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811170189","doi":"10.7202/1045942ar","title":"LE LOCATEUR À LONG TERME D’UN BIEN MEUBLE DOIT-IL PUBLIER LE BAIL AFIN QUE SON TITRE DE PROPRIÉTÉ SOIT OPPOSABLE AUX TIERS ?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"College Ahuntsic; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.026853761630266197,"score_gpt":0.24258828840347926,"score_spread":0.21573452677321306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811170189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038673203,0.019769289,0.018020123,0.26658908,0.004505238,0.00008881037,0.0006361726,0.00025871675,0.6514594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4722096,0.009160931,0.007286974,0.025466308,0.003424117,0.00020209585,0.0003162648,0.0002869095,0.48164678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917761,0.0022850712,0.00038704908,0.0010823759,0.0029079597,0.0015614146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827147,0.004689103,0.0028729155,0.0023453175,0.004901601,0.0024763504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007039462,0.00034890298,0.0008136379,0.0017089759,0.006723333,0.012725948,0.0019766928,0.008481566,0.038999584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023634236,0.0004078508,0.0006787304,0.0021093576,0.008941576,0.0145362625,0.007054317,0.005493499,0.013498328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081519036,0.000055759254,0.0032131362,0.00016005771,0.000028664217,0.0004082242,0.0047162776,0.00015466777,0.0008870221,0.86763173,0.08100531,0.041657615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003225827,0.000121706835,0.006190547,0.0005866309,0.000033225773,0.00080405537,0.005897211,0.0002473213,0.0008354636,0.11223968,0.87293094,0.00008098259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01519415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024813887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038999584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071429545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010081218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13046664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811389096","doi":"10.7202/1045321ar","title":"REGARDS CROISÉS SUR LA SAISINE DU LIQUIDATEUR SUCCESSORAL ET SUR LES DROITS DES HÉRITIERS ET DES LÉGATAIRES","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.056503914799182424,"score_gpt":0.2969585352828174,"score_spread":0.24045462048363497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811389096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13474739,0.08701765,0.0034460013,0.073195554,0.0041077,0.00007169935,0.0012908204,0.00009988352,0.6960232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5387328,0.040381394,0.0015334961,0.010650284,0.0021696493,0.000075334756,0.0006145885,0.00009660295,0.4057458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959293,0.0007450651,0.00024260339,0.0004891273,0.0019623907,0.0006315137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654585,0.001452113,0.0006513967,0.00016102944,0.00095860945,0.00023104316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035237335,0.00025306756,0.00032519456,0.0016251287,0.0037847564,0.003575685,0.0008993093,0.0025662428,0.019596864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009335574,0.0002318013,0.00034078571,0.0022910219,0.004024907,0.0030769461,0.0024811777,0.004383556,0.0022556356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013756148,0.000056671597,0.00918428,0.00039723434,0.000028359224,0.001277624,0.022386175,0.00027332257,0.002065341,0.75896853,0.10565259,0.099572375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008352938,0.00008549567,0.023506626,0.000591682,0.000018697127,0.0008415525,0.0057158945,0.00009605462,0.0007919611,0.01692916,0.9513641,0.000050324965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057362378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07531531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057362378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035568315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050292322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114057004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811512832","doi":"10.7202/1046150ar","title":"LE CONTRACTANT DE BONNE FOI ET LA CAUSE ILLÉGALE : RÉFLEXIONS SUR LE MUTISME DU LÉGISLATEUR","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.025409712018227726,"score_gpt":0.2855526171290658,"score_spread":0.2601429051108381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811512832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15852684,0.0059678424,0.020984037,0.16425979,0.00073436426,0.00006489267,0.00013051672,0.000073131385,0.6492586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96641916,0.0007685908,0.0013615045,0.0037559215,0.00010054535,0.00003813346,0.000014626145,0.00002914704,0.027512422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989604,0.0043011117,0.00026410935,0.001065734,0.0028524217,0.0019125815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894956,0.006030992,0.0009350667,0.00086720445,0.0019142925,0.00075686176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011259516,0.00030468416,0.0006145109,0.0014842687,0.01396391,0.009729188,0.0016915656,0.005886976,0.0053606005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015886677,0.0003917416,0.0004715803,0.0012439644,0.05773868,0.0050773383,0.0046033366,0.0063016736,0.00035678284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029598768,0.0000029776966,0.00040493952,0.0000105658355,0.0000025228928,0.000039433726,0.0055020405,0.000060964067,0.000045118766,0.991154,0.0009704027,0.0018040409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022405542,0.000030290423,0.008112576,0.0004767132,0.000030921212,0.00021936744,0.02282246,0.0013633271,0.00059012085,0.7273049,0.23896103,0.00006595977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37731934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45887923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37731934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029330816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036645602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75024617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28736825","doi":"10.1002/chem.201702218","title":"Limitation Periods and the Symbiosis of Capacity and Discoverability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Plaintiff; Statute; Doctrine; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.014182239939746379,"score_gpt":0.2646675389644787,"score_spread":0.2504852990247323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28736825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6329543,0.010994722,0.050740343,0.026976284,0.00019630785,0.000074311574,0.0003002857,0.0002326788,0.2775307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99175733,0.0010178655,0.002417413,0.00017344106,0.000044659297,0.000030397254,0.00002422311,0.000021145148,0.0045135682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982198,0.00050767994,0.00010471772,0.00039066933,0.0004299679,0.00034716708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883957,0.0050585824,0.0020996365,0.00211012,0.0007380152,0.0015979195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045237136,0.00025758907,0.00052819384,0.00157713,0.0016086547,0.004569559,0.0014741902,0.0017722844,0.009087129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01342199,0.00039974606,0.00028583524,0.0010806837,0.011445186,0.013223097,0.0058908705,0.001270381,0.0006875284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013372966,0.00003354381,0.005510081,0.00014673763,0.000034731,0.00045012243,0.0025853126,0.0017406923,0.004619234,0.9412621,0.0012538118,0.04222983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023894718,0.0001241276,0.006298411,0.00010670274,0.000019096478,0.0010786882,0.00316883,0.0028727367,0.0024501162,0.93328226,0.05051845,0.000056647026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091380096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005826204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009087129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025301618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014616026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030399442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883193349","doi":"10.29173/alr2486","title":"The Presumption Against Interference with Vested Rights: Creating Structure out of the Confusion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Statutory interpretation; Statute; Statutory law; Underpinning; Law and economics; Confusion; Jurisprudence; Ambiguity; Harm; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Burden of proof; Enforcement; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.02221082809669976,"score_gpt":0.3130965508887331,"score_spread":0.29088572279203334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883193349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07339766,0.017811881,0.1888824,0.24469656,0.0009022311,0.0002245955,0.00026430117,0.00017136267,0.47364894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93522006,0.0051265177,0.035394404,0.008280826,0.00021677552,0.00008283013,0.00005757169,0.000066778026,0.015554331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98781025,0.004007638,0.0005708259,0.0014703926,0.004570548,0.0015702303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889937,0.006913806,0.00079964404,0.0011358322,0.001749,0.0004079902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016482593,0.00055138156,0.0009421437,0.003771857,0.012538566,0.01698726,0.0047655515,0.006895621,0.0030210628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02141159,0.00085675664,0.0010626373,0.0027061906,0.08851959,0.0114471875,0.0076027745,0.011325815,0.00038469452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018965815,0.0000019053923,0.00013212435,0.000015835965,0.0000020784014,0.000049759197,0.0028034057,0.00016099056,0.000051714,0.99354315,0.00046946105,0.0027676895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008784148,0.000008123637,0.0008842226,0.00032068766,0.00001456836,0.00008058908,0.003765207,0.0010479661,0.00034551678,0.95093733,0.04255744,0.000029587018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.431867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54485834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.431867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06034305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08917576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85870653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883889275","doi":"10.71781/2494","title":"Les mailles de la fiducie en contexte de dissolution de l'union matrimoniale : de l'application des mécanismes du C.C.Q. au soulèvement du voile fiduciaire en droit québécois","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.019283966190272697,"score_gpt":0.3457603526674308,"score_spread":0.32647638647715815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883889275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44311723,0.005660835,0.005235486,0.13301004,0.0004481364,0.00008060507,0.00031523267,0.000031156676,0.4121012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590102,0.0009005419,0.00059072045,0.0022071053,0.000050724102,0.00003975818,0.000038105623,0.000022009004,0.037140872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699605,0.0013414996,0.00005709094,0.00024698695,0.0004833654,0.000875063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958163,0.0017537099,0.0005311173,0.00012304312,0.00096382364,0.0008119824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036975348,0.00037854895,0.00040692245,0.0016663419,0.023676716,0.011881532,0.0020634877,0.0048616813,0.018704282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007538988,0.0003331819,0.00033217078,0.0017889948,0.020777881,0.0052939616,0.004608601,0.0047228765,0.00065701245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044844466,0.00003483885,0.011944916,0.00009714677,0.00001273874,0.0008168468,0.24457648,0.0003831753,0.00019305485,0.71420777,0.012680325,0.015007903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020466297,0.000046599536,0.052054662,0.0008884098,0.000038548755,0.0002384289,0.6133321,0.0011962638,0.00036897438,0.061842825,0.2698681,0.00010456327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.834479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9001913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16552103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05454879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046725575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39578098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885507078","doi":"10.5040/9781509915217.ch-016","title":"Vindicatory Damages for Violation of Constitutional Rights: A Comparative Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0928765589383807,"score_gpt":0.3254005974540145,"score_spread":0.2325240385156338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885507078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008242171,0.021006444,0.010574466,0.007358616,0.0005347575,0.000053962616,0.00009246124,0.000021014417,0.9521161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8530641,0.03153802,0.010551066,0.004786958,0.002048361,0.0003872502,0.00020420777,0.00013034209,0.097289644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412966,0.003259406,0.0001453103,0.00044574382,0.0014514555,0.0005684103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921753,0.0058470992,0.00041068526,0.0005744933,0.00082148414,0.00017097466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006353231,0.0007294015,0.0010653732,0.006625861,0.0047261147,0.008754264,0.0023307942,0.0063515212,0.022248968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012212618,0.00056919403,0.0012358398,0.0047797477,0.017674051,0.01465762,0.0047560735,0.0062984675,0.0011216913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051513052,0.000008574556,0.000036703816,0.00003685049,0.000004072411,0.000030233487,0.00025814673,0.00015383364,0.00002272067,0.99520653,0.0014752385,0.0027619312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017211005,0.000052145555,0.0010452596,0.0006564868,0.000036651352,0.00021589918,0.0015656526,0.00077154563,0.00015427308,0.88058484,0.11487762,0.000022417473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003590353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058609443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022248968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015202664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034124483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11030358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888692749","doi":"","title":"Explaining the Principled Exception to Privity of Contract","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Management; Contract management; Exclusion clause","score_opus":0.13549006378629563,"score_gpt":0.3836514996750749,"score_spread":0.24816143588877926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888692749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066074766,0.0023310694,0.08507562,0.09304183,0.00083972217,0.00018664452,0.0001344981,0.00015721931,0.7521586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94189626,0.0009559084,0.013412051,0.011971149,0.00037886045,0.00022798245,0.000052290245,0.000055280885,0.031050282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830478,0.005139812,0.00080128823,0.002258671,0.006066251,0.0026861625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187803,0.004353967,0.000813455,0.0012259794,0.0013957398,0.00033287288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010860387,0.0002850618,0.00061286706,0.0012094992,0.0074574524,0.008653536,0.0018499134,0.0105921095,0.0019537162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016247725,0.00057400437,0.0010925059,0.0009249692,0.040299136,0.0053934036,0.006986883,0.0110350475,0.0005100719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.536431e-7,0.0000019567626,0.000046286546,0.000002303419,8.365886e-7,0.00002944535,0.00025914566,0.00013943962,0.000015980893,0.9987394,0.00047827055,0.00028639624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009761297,0.000007184116,0.00017898223,0.00005328408,0.0000030508827,0.00006425172,0.00023202634,0.0011172951,0.00009380131,0.97215617,0.026070664,0.000013549558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028927876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016857687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028927876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017302161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0722841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888969776","doi":"","title":"Shield or Shackles: The Pitfalls of Stronger Dispute Resolution Provisions in Insurance Legislation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Legislation; Dispute mechanism; Economic Justice; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Law and economics; Process (computing); Insurance policy; Law; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics","score_opus":0.04221115337208796,"score_gpt":0.3127467879829412,"score_spread":0.2705356346108532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888969776","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09619311,0.009374507,0.14795768,0.41660863,0.0015054835,0.0002994504,0.00010586915,0.0006537436,0.32730156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90166557,0.002014586,0.043633763,0.027722476,0.0010323162,0.0002719101,0.000039893384,0.00023884999,0.023380676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9211958,0.045435764,0.0032141407,0.004838751,0.021040186,0.0042753415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8140313,0.14872219,0.005049631,0.01820378,0.010986535,0.0030066208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10450325,0.00042736795,0.0011570592,0.002731741,0.01273275,0.018217748,0.0041967,0.011370673,0.00874507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12257802,0.0011196705,0.0011815885,0.0023726658,0.06269782,0.021443233,0.014983603,0.02161303,0.0016219892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013427043,0.000018270255,0.00012544029,0.000030391138,0.0000033420165,0.00004001597,0.0039219838,0.00022131913,0.000165368,0.9831812,0.0027169366,0.009562372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008476817,0.000065355445,0.0007255988,0.00042075873,0.000022691207,0.00013635308,0.0037812586,0.0025701416,0.00065132976,0.90818274,0.08330771,0.000051366023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027245302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028157247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10450325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015741602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03028003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5526726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889277361","doi":"","title":"Joint Vicarious Liability in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Supreme court; Joint and several liability; Law; Joint (building); Political science; Liability; Contributory negligence; Business; Tort; Engineering","score_opus":0.07389868760942742,"score_gpt":0.3064658331882723,"score_spread":0.2325671455788449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889277361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19046158,0.006429635,0.0090469355,0.12008907,0.0011889949,0.00028714602,0.00048027225,0.00011201676,0.67190427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091808,0.001120254,0.0015990991,0.010502403,0.00028985663,0.00008188164,0.000066979665,0.000037717477,0.077121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860386,0.0015356705,0.00036590433,0.0015588825,0.004659626,0.0058413185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901722,0.0033886074,0.00040888658,0.00048272897,0.0033207152,0.002226841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075629796,0.0005599222,0.0010750546,0.0015493318,0.027743505,0.016057609,0.004136244,0.020019045,0.006214091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027127013,0.00097471126,0.0009201365,0.0022876663,0.012332562,0.003523586,0.005461823,0.014909101,0.0005681723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042008043,0.00002985454,0.0021669923,0.000023436694,0.00004522313,0.00046056075,0.0024883817,0.0017548613,0.00014863488,0.9571484,0.030138234,0.0055534663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017887789,0.000073063995,0.011526651,0.0004367315,0.00031269103,0.0003690875,0.008331715,0.01377532,0.0010771864,0.6902273,0.27332583,0.0003655352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94670326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97628343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07669761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07669761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18146464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5564827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889400010","doi":"","title":"“An Unconscionable Thing for the One to Do Towards the Other:” The Doctrine of Fraudulent Concealment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Plaintiff; Unconscionability; Cause of action; Law; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Political science; Common law; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.15340271677365055,"score_gpt":0.384241553108885,"score_spread":0.23083883633523447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889400010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039022278,0.02125032,0.031634554,0.3551515,0.0020673566,0.00013670087,0.00021794839,0.00009125194,0.5504281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8711326,0.0054632165,0.009472751,0.041614674,0.0009561106,0.00006799938,0.000066542365,0.000043287557,0.07118277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911247,0.0015569746,0.00031512533,0.00089438865,0.0044980813,0.0016106552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950506,0.001991878,0.00048665376,0.00056109397,0.0015468945,0.00036286662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007107609,0.00034980892,0.0005478311,0.0011838874,0.010207353,0.006512798,0.002408026,0.0074584824,0.0027392467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017204762,0.00033217773,0.00060176133,0.001063717,0.041812953,0.005153994,0.0024703625,0.0070410855,0.0005130527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003838402,0.000003319624,0.00025273985,0.000025659152,0.000003632324,0.00005998416,0.0015130709,0.00004958063,0.00009053106,0.98716915,0.0058936463,0.0049348874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022361073,0.000027025362,0.002850049,0.0005092236,0.000042603682,0.0003084488,0.0036712016,0.0005977863,0.00086847466,0.6723141,0.3187141,0.00007461095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44533283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46865585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44533283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016194262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05072761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8854814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889979920","doi":"","title":"Recent procedural developements in the british House of Commons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0504972135876854,"score_gpt":0.3313197504871752,"score_spread":0.2808225368994898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889979920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031801037,0.10347655,0.009480935,0.32765344,0.012306861,0.0009566505,0.0026751438,0.0004649142,0.5111846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36018193,0.043851517,0.022640327,0.09384669,0.0047596754,0.00063755404,0.0016413037,0.0003973211,0.4720437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9395319,0.009071124,0.00355454,0.003006143,0.037385512,0.007450775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9330951,0.022412984,0.0026982455,0.0025388591,0.03590991,0.0033449514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04090208,0.0007041214,0.0008940115,0.00955042,0.014392472,0.016606404,0.0047807936,0.01113887,0.006978356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09073655,0.0014891905,0.0009866947,0.013304394,0.008765857,0.0034372984,0.0028826417,0.0087753,0.00093069114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048754242,0.000046188474,0.0010322883,0.00061882706,0.00004007142,0.00014992148,0.0041175177,0.0010832928,0.00048226948,0.5767689,0.35604116,0.059570853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017864471,0.00002111731,0.008132482,0.00047215176,0.000037693277,0.000044221993,0.0008372483,0.00033954473,0.00048250108,0.014403696,0.975111,0.00010045474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9217616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96946925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9217616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11425513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17121457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8289829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890602623","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2018.1509498","title":"Assumed jurisdiction in Canada: identifying and interpreting presumptive connecting factors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction; Business; Project commissioning; Political science; Law; Public relations; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02887300920327236,"score_gpt":0.3275674387100743,"score_spread":0.298694429506802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890602623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48400387,0.008460696,0.03939747,0.08101841,0.00038407402,0.0005408687,0.0022010237,0.0001554447,0.38383812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851542,0.0011999584,0.0068590553,0.0023621349,0.000023146154,0.00005595195,0.00012920283,0.000025338444,0.0041910894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702515,0.0057495413,0.0014234832,0.0028975403,0.012257028,0.0074209645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9452012,0.023810046,0.0032965266,0.0018533196,0.022965342,0.0028735863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019115617,0.0004746212,0.000851628,0.0057996092,0.024470875,0.018478628,0.0051263934,0.004354172,0.0037279162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08431144,0.0009130138,0.00088061177,0.007011072,0.02259645,0.0056207986,0.0077932063,0.007894038,0.00020090528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005682219,0.000025510944,0.03287976,0.00023712384,0.00008003163,0.0012412469,0.048126608,0.0033076487,0.0003233544,0.8717097,0.013351332,0.02866099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001457381,0.00006534522,0.1434002,0.0037015418,0.00064297643,0.0009082271,0.12903103,0.02636325,0.002746558,0.49962032,0.19277506,0.00059974985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99338573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17734537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17734537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36752114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9541628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891016535","doi":"","title":"Lock-Ups, Squeeze-Outs, and Canadian Takeover Bid Law: A Curious Interplay of Public and Private Interests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lock (firearm); Business; Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.01932801093397525,"score_gpt":0.28377992968871857,"score_spread":0.26445191875474333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891016535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28111872,0.004445633,0.00472508,0.08869956,0.00021540506,0.000111937436,0.00039000093,0.00010326282,0.6201904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97513855,0.0008098862,0.00036841718,0.0029519678,0.000058892078,0.000018425972,0.000029258894,0.000026612746,0.020597912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387425,0.0005293208,0.000116004536,0.0006090795,0.0023745804,0.0024968034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918119,0.0038753657,0.00056615594,0.00039523715,0.002020204,0.0013312052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046463977,0.00040019045,0.00083722913,0.0019626485,0.014669533,0.015326017,0.0024669582,0.0077953893,0.014808194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022969773,0.0006081031,0.0006789109,0.002608347,0.014175657,0.0059581087,0.003308233,0.008787561,0.00032933065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056451754,0.00003004232,0.004572289,0.000035065867,0.000020956786,0.00010793593,0.0033851773,0.0006784914,0.00018850785,0.9707535,0.011946301,0.008225181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024547387,0.00009147678,0.07259354,0.0004880555,0.00035079272,0.00020523668,0.023139305,0.009819844,0.0012079076,0.65009445,0.24128175,0.00048227224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9775925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98828006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09134536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09134536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09311098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6627601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892429910","doi":"","title":"CANADA V PEIGAN:: HAS THE FEDERAL COURT GIVEN IN TO TEMPTATION?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Original jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Political science; Appeal; High Court; Court of equity; Court of record","score_opus":0.05167844187224907,"score_gpt":0.32099670258496793,"score_spread":0.26931826071271886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892429910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015046918,0.024637355,0.0011406764,0.6071191,0.002552555,0.000039564122,0.00049760303,0.00007325809,0.34889302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5603291,0.012451889,0.0024379746,0.30102053,0.0012727913,0.000058715195,0.000241364,0.00011106169,0.1220766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945372,0.0005512792,0.000101420665,0.0007364696,0.002285817,0.0017879162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655885,0.0011813346,0.00014384753,0.00011428892,0.0015744978,0.00042715654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034036573,0.00029012075,0.00046149804,0.0013695277,0.0145625025,0.008962093,0.0022960037,0.0115305735,0.009307888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011179691,0.0003390491,0.00043129877,0.0021960938,0.013155585,0.0041887905,0.0019602214,0.008851797,0.0008554641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018019886,0.0000069790735,0.0009779306,0.00008356128,0.000010363692,0.00027505192,0.003301983,0.00005731374,0.00015816095,0.72634774,0.25516796,0.013594921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027630755,0.0000088758925,0.005285713,0.0006061845,0.00003668644,0.00025278135,0.005368718,0.00021335037,0.0004427997,0.06744602,0.92022204,0.000089235284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98508227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071626134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071626134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10552857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5196864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892672175","doi":"","title":"Ordinary Wrongs as Constitutional Rights: The Public Law Model of Torts in South Asia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Private law; Doctrine; Public law; Political science; Supreme court; Comparative law; Common law; Municipal law; Jurisdiction; Civil law (Civil law); Chinese law; Liability","score_opus":0.015386797452949366,"score_gpt":0.2748195397780427,"score_spread":0.25943274232509334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892672175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10171635,0.0029067944,0.0429002,0.033436555,0.00018874643,0.00010326928,0.00009605004,0.00007291815,0.8185792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724338,0.0012236168,0.0022010552,0.0013119631,0.00014542931,0.000078069446,0.000020959631,0.000033628945,0.02255146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838555,0.00069234695,0.000064483596,0.00019222443,0.0003692598,0.0002960376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790883,0.0010448034,0.00030780458,0.00043004143,0.00016391839,0.00014465277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024144044,0.0004327272,0.00037435693,0.0014533914,0.00397568,0.010790383,0.0015781395,0.003918334,0.006429367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025665944,0.00044499122,0.0008012051,0.001367977,0.034467828,0.0120837465,0.006696412,0.00706615,0.0007298681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011081493,0.0000052473597,0.000101203164,0.00000686233,0.0000010461912,0.000073919124,0.002165772,0.00015240225,0.00002862622,0.9967314,0.0001315092,0.00060096604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010595202,0.000017005115,0.0005400541,0.00009191196,0.000009557509,0.0002196404,0.0033521776,0.0014356131,0.00014152894,0.97276354,0.02140671,0.000011680369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067566475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055442066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010790383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065660817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00539994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047640443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893064907","doi":"10.1017/cls.2018.16","title":"Law’s Financialization: Litigation Finance and Multilayer Access to Justice in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financialization; Redress; Liberalization; Economic Justice; Political science; Financial crisis; Financial services; Economics; Political economy; Finance; Market economy; Law; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.024668540347798494,"score_gpt":0.29771929753932863,"score_spread":0.27305075719153016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893064907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8141456,0.0020656325,0.0004927732,0.047165435,0.000092194256,0.0000813506,0.00053237274,0.000020428524,0.13540418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939786,0.0006831419,0.00012319167,0.001302203,0.000018300192,0.000006924587,0.00005352144,0.000003865432,0.0038303016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945393,0.00034422392,0.0001081948,0.00028492243,0.0018691622,0.0028541319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98631126,0.0030028652,0.0017912503,0.0003309919,0.004491164,0.0040725106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002545334,0.00018354852,0.00038230393,0.003371395,0.016526511,0.011397699,0.001984653,0.0019903176,0.0073931115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014112254,0.0002891187,0.00036539504,0.0054680426,0.012534569,0.002494959,0.005739608,0.0046482263,0.00015049966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111545036,0.0003261503,0.20001958,0.00012227026,0.000074653195,0.0024527507,0.04663633,0.0021413602,0.0005218061,0.66775393,0.02793292,0.051906712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076282544,0.00011127172,0.55192304,0.001010301,0.00016341804,0.0008092307,0.15237717,0.0076207872,0.0010343686,0.06813152,0.21640562,0.00033699512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18455116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18455116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23790704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9458051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893395284","doi":"","title":"THE SOURCE, NATURE, AND CONTENT OF THE CROWN’S UNDERLYING TITLE TO ABORIGINAL TITLE LANDS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); State (computer science); Common law; Medicine","score_opus":0.05059879568264792,"score_gpt":0.37163687395719963,"score_spread":0.3210380782745517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893395284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079637565,0.0018762094,0.010346281,0.016070936,0.00043753276,0.00012562594,0.00028288516,0.000039582388,0.89118344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217889,0.001581902,0.0042441403,0.0035914914,0.0004359646,0.0000776329,0.00010932218,0.000043034972,0.06812766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99329174,0.0014458834,0.00034296708,0.00069630163,0.0029958517,0.0012272716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918933,0.0045168702,0.0006982022,0.00071345235,0.0018556939,0.00032245737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050228247,0.00019325093,0.0004178522,0.0016738414,0.00601234,0.008397379,0.0016761905,0.0045090136,0.0042783124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013339525,0.00041275466,0.00039698047,0.0016354439,0.015548281,0.0033480201,0.002991998,0.003937215,0.001007377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008580837,0.000011849078,0.001051277,0.000041158644,0.0000068658087,0.00039101214,0.0067206216,0.00009424004,0.00049949205,0.9832667,0.003152027,0.004756229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003688707,0.00008428282,0.017461095,0.0016373819,0.00013118175,0.0015576757,0.018630015,0.001869207,0.004779861,0.5427472,0.41094315,0.00012215886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06022886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08766268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078711305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013845817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11975658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895796153","doi":"10.29173/alr2502","title":"Apples to Oranges? Gendered Damages in Personal Injury Litigation: A Focus on Infant Claims","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Tort; Personal injury; Law; Discounting; Wrongful death; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.03807729595906227,"score_gpt":0.3579791923026672,"score_spread":0.31990189634360494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895796153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09016893,0.28754586,0.0056415275,0.19871134,0.0016673676,0.00006122953,0.00007953436,0.00003196588,0.41609234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8473557,0.07429582,0.0017233216,0.032690752,0.0011933907,0.000048387617,0.000021800777,0.00002730521,0.042643603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939294,0.0028642896,0.00015375114,0.0005616924,0.0017607099,0.00073008804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920095,0.0057918075,0.0009985886,0.0001943242,0.0007578619,0.0002478963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00759112,0.00024844366,0.0006374813,0.002477438,0.0033900735,0.007022737,0.0013207537,0.0069853743,0.004363018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012169196,0.00029857922,0.0005019404,0.0020196298,0.010352419,0.005406305,0.0022638922,0.0042119706,0.0004119219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015769607,0.00004062858,0.0027900778,0.00020993744,0.000019660774,0.00034253308,0.004940322,0.0003553141,0.00022253084,0.92639494,0.0122101335,0.05245802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025774236,0.0002433204,0.034610372,0.0034192193,0.00017587829,0.0013890096,0.0222613,0.0012419078,0.000932924,0.3956198,0.53997856,0.000101902544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06050181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12718801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9394982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009200507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006596343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12029928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896167223","doi":"","title":"CONFUSION IN MATERIAL CONTRIBUTION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Causation; Confusion; Economic Justice; Political science; Underpinning; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01913521227157854,"score_gpt":0.3034768577057742,"score_spread":0.28434164543419566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896167223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023694395,0.026333855,0.00656353,0.5824979,0.037987955,0.00024151265,0.0011235625,0.00020349791,0.34267876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24071847,0.03614068,0.012751523,0.48056015,0.03568138,0.00092959625,0.0013801708,0.00073956564,0.19109844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94487405,0.015026227,0.0034841811,0.005988539,0.024745766,0.005881264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9298813,0.027655713,0.00161961,0.007407743,0.030053109,0.0033824483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046432,0.0006434771,0.0012777798,0.007983534,0.013789657,0.015436911,0.007824061,0.010834473,0.024707539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12845826,0.0009437537,0.0009465967,0.0052015553,0.019555602,0.009046608,0.0077530383,0.010520585,0.0053796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014852492,0.000008975066,0.00020668477,0.00033118686,0.000012023443,0.00016951155,0.0027799548,0.000056190485,0.000081255785,0.70448434,0.26603252,0.02582255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053523468,0.0000065173067,0.00056127703,0.0014705479,0.00001641039,0.00020042725,0.0020199586,0.00007650606,0.00016719961,0.068287134,0.9271629,0.000025725516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22897352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2737487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22897352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040623114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08084852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4552815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896191210","doi":"10.4337/9781786431271.00036","title":"The structure of remedial law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Tort; Law; Scope (computer science); Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Public law; Private law; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.021527688196784522,"score_gpt":0.262387924564984,"score_spread":0.24086023636819948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896191210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004146073,0.0064343475,0.036645014,0.01873182,0.000383719,0.00009830905,0.000101597005,0.00015074594,0.93330836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6272058,0.010777179,0.04765088,0.008821065,0.001557378,0.0006371931,0.00032333154,0.00031601,0.30271125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514043,0.0016909246,0.0001783318,0.0007147293,0.0019092703,0.00036633175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667203,0.0018710637,0.00025154706,0.0005131657,0.000560062,0.00013211413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003745193,0.0004047038,0.0005900729,0.0029179524,0.0032929215,0.007951979,0.001467488,0.0033293022,0.010421583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00703189,0.00044697995,0.00046600972,0.0024078693,0.028505554,0.008423776,0.003696618,0.0064167744,0.0021881245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.533928e-7,0.000001754237,0.000009677756,0.000006882278,3.1720734e-7,0.0000030814547,0.00016144384,0.00003819299,0.000011034852,0.9971475,0.0007939976,0.0018257078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004540966,0.000007977683,0.00010674499,0.000100086654,0.0000019715326,0.000027871893,0.00020031471,0.0003947379,0.00008067546,0.89258486,0.106483996,0.0000062812164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033566996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032283636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010421583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008168741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063934475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059268653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896809647","doi":"10.4000/books.putc.624","title":"Les patrimoines affectés en droit québécois : fiducie et droit des successions","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.046414043023377496,"score_gpt":0.3252597219216673,"score_spread":0.2788456788982898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896809647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25475037,0.014947715,0.0015324672,0.010604569,0.00041357306,0.000071660645,0.00051624334,0.000057022677,0.71710634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7309582,0.004057423,0.00050238875,0.0005221683,0.000055159933,0.000020474834,0.00012042362,0.000025761088,0.26373798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994954,0.00007721335,0.00001009305,0.00006477655,0.00013035216,0.00022207784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995863,0.000045533914,0.00004369351,0.000019406303,0.000170576,0.00013452402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003927134,0.00035220114,0.00022901269,0.0012682164,0.010274821,0.0028614264,0.0007855713,0.0006941351,0.014581359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009361847,0.00018765654,0.00015873517,0.0018717723,0.006266861,0.00082004146,0.0011576633,0.0012145228,0.00069671986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006753098,0.000056406483,0.027978884,0.00018668194,0.000024394783,0.0013073157,0.13247763,0.0013757078,0.0011920688,0.63036275,0.08657565,0.11839499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008785076,0.00003790026,0.0982603,0.0005271873,0.000019000683,0.0005246034,0.055945825,0.00075793365,0.00044154262,0.01713293,0.8262941,0.00004977455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96912396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98557645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04090214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04090214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025304582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29676718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897181213","doi":"","title":"Rights-Threats, Wrongs and Injustices: The Common Law’s Causes of Action","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Damages; Political science; Action (physics); Common law; Meaning (existential); Cause of action; Private law; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Psychology; Plaintiff","score_opus":0.04071145379166113,"score_gpt":0.36532299753079456,"score_spread":0.3246115437391334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897181213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13583419,0.015206196,0.10207751,0.28805953,0.000987026,0.00023104112,0.00023295755,0.00011265329,0.45725888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809264,0.00217528,0.005657427,0.004904893,0.00041261333,0.00009904249,0.000027293527,0.00002305027,0.0057738894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846318,0.0064978036,0.00066082913,0.0017313228,0.004925692,0.0015525192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98190916,0.0126195215,0.0023176023,0.0016453936,0.0010266949,0.0004815798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011677144,0.0006256099,0.0014000802,0.003718736,0.005776151,0.013275043,0.001754937,0.0126717435,0.0029724056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016784372,0.00076316757,0.0014178474,0.002388118,0.09768152,0.018508863,0.0067775273,0.010389128,0.00031854573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020636915,0.000008058877,0.00025109365,0.000013711437,0.0000043781274,0.000031825002,0.0006058858,0.00013700621,0.000024415276,0.99725217,0.00036849658,0.0013008225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074712275,0.000008742775,0.0005951724,0.000073123316,0.000007204881,0.000083346575,0.0007664536,0.00043517386,0.00009065383,0.9907295,0.0071919444,0.000011108903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006072012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057487255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013275043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00961851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010408986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06978744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898484665","doi":"","title":"Good Faith as An Organizing Principle in Contract Law: Bhasin v Hrynew – Two Steps Forward & One Look","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Duty; Doctrine; Supreme court; Political science; Faith; Fair dealing; Good faith; Bad faith; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04119949123924443,"score_gpt":0.34038703641733986,"score_spread":0.2991875451780954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898484665","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022512438,0.049361195,0.0110151395,0.69474244,0.0019054357,0.000094516225,0.0000755486,0.000037351077,0.22025587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7549051,0.0248511,0.008809101,0.15404147,0.0019580137,0.0001576502,0.000070802555,0.000078024284,0.05512872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191225,0.0023302,0.00022157015,0.0009208806,0.0034158933,0.0011992223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953484,0.0026346124,0.00030348255,0.0003225005,0.00081899046,0.0005720878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011568341,0.000282136,0.00066116854,0.001090725,0.007738071,0.010039455,0.0027318073,0.010949653,0.002560296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011915791,0.00053621555,0.00048598688,0.0012443169,0.044242404,0.00930817,0.0053503895,0.016750615,0.00042088606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040676723,0.0000047124486,0.00008533309,0.000017577431,0.0000013879421,0.000061259125,0.001224282,0.00003850958,0.00004542863,0.9867879,0.0074574254,0.0042721415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000299621,0.000026184527,0.0011993571,0.00063300517,0.000009391613,0.00019998247,0.0033563839,0.00046333842,0.0001886466,0.760289,0.2335378,0.00006691608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46047387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51523995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5395261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024695642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041095212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9155872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898677318","doi":"","title":"REORGANIZATION: A COMMERCIAL CONCEPT JURIDICIALLY DEFINED","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Law; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.03076101241153468,"score_gpt":0.31739299367690466,"score_spread":0.28663198126537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898677318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024941098,0.010002129,0.020738274,0.026295586,0.001121392,0.00015485212,0.00016854337,0.000088924004,0.9164892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9217104,0.0032948067,0.0039336537,0.005996879,0.0005348491,0.00016865571,0.00013564514,0.00007028813,0.06415481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275476,0.0016757424,0.00032157334,0.00078694505,0.002854111,0.0016068367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572384,0.001354135,0.00063317374,0.0004658805,0.0014001149,0.00042298465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033658734,0.00028412841,0.00038273184,0.0032116706,0.006967038,0.011081996,0.0023587102,0.0035533346,0.0060834815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00773876,0.00029016915,0.0003076715,0.004978659,0.040065087,0.0052487636,0.004259517,0.0049142726,0.0007544696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029178439,0.0000028717686,0.00016379035,0.000016919144,0.0000013559971,0.00003993653,0.0015175772,0.00004141387,0.00007631188,0.99167645,0.0038520887,0.002608377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017267475,0.000025293803,0.0043251063,0.0004215574,0.000019349814,0.00053815835,0.010846663,0.00059182406,0.00040843588,0.28358513,0.6991662,0.000054981734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11465255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1665849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11465255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014924783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025529329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22797036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899225986","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3175444","title":"A Fiduciary Duty of Care for Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of care; Duty; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008288983912550243,"score_gpt":0.28884140867802494,"score_spread":0.2805524247654747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899225986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034051232,0.0031160044,0.0026989048,0.366021,0.0032002092,0.00019469418,0.00074023445,0.00011705287,0.5898607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5486817,0.0018096791,0.003887223,0.15519941,0.00079889403,0.00016381622,0.00027487846,0.00014235951,0.289042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98730624,0.0013239142,0.00035005074,0.0011470718,0.004044661,0.0058280597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98517597,0.0033492094,0.00044031223,0.000830824,0.0056738383,0.004529784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054448834,0.00040088844,0.00088938186,0.0012993644,0.025249925,0.011197396,0.0031535397,0.021498926,0.01724046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02940704,0.00078785367,0.0008595282,0.0014759508,0.0108160805,0.0035562012,0.0051562004,0.015899794,0.0014215235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024280465,0.000027086224,0.001628917,0.00003573445,0.000014264074,0.00019920911,0.0024282227,0.0001655229,0.00012651033,0.8521951,0.13558108,0.0075740367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008411571,0.0000375401,0.0053634634,0.0004954129,0.000053496988,0.00033343257,0.0066833044,0.0010230576,0.00032777502,0.11971024,0.86574227,0.00014597067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97567433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9820722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06179001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06179001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.318292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44832003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899657898","doi":"","title":"Groia: Four Strikes and You're Not Out","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Tribunal; Scrutiny; Duty; Context (archaeology); Misconduct; High Court; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.03156044426434221,"score_gpt":0.3159695401710803,"score_spread":0.28440909590673813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899657898","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0129383225,0.006090275,0.00070375367,0.55192435,0.012030436,0.00006384453,0.0003329723,0.00023153969,0.41568458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.118841,0.003014874,0.00066471065,0.6326304,0.0036059823,0.00005254557,0.00018269347,0.00021968991,0.24078815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934592,0.00044759878,0.00010665581,0.00040620755,0.0029285487,0.0026517038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699223,0.00083489215,0.00013958824,0.00009954747,0.0014540693,0.00047972135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002815842,0.0004759668,0.0005119384,0.0010694818,0.02283638,0.011239001,0.002921359,0.013370897,0.012366411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009882767,0.00035787205,0.000934548,0.0010013211,0.008368349,0.0029054487,0.0027749438,0.017465603,0.0029627767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002878109,0.000021245884,0.001657172,0.000065689164,0.000009399694,0.00054591004,0.008651114,0.000076766264,0.00019531892,0.1439309,0.8347886,0.0100291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000642749,0.000013770701,0.0025152008,0.00018223835,0.000013650539,0.00015570245,0.009691561,0.000057832574,0.00013611234,0.0042533283,0.9829402,0.000033944787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76002026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9072007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76002026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0188984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033778396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48278606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899711185","doi":"","title":"THE CURIOUS HISTORY OF INTERJURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY AND ITS (LACK OF) APPLICATION TO FEDERAL LEGISLATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Doctrine; Law; Jurisdiction; Confusion; Political science; Federal jurisdiction; Psychology","score_opus":0.06791176723274683,"score_gpt":0.3410161437907523,"score_spread":0.27310437655800546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899711185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011448016,0.069507875,0.015495299,0.14469174,0.0027266948,0.0000677041,0.0002964965,0.000119857345,0.7556463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7288393,0.056556545,0.010674798,0.0638361,0.0023310867,0.00010341807,0.00018833605,0.00017201227,0.13729832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98801464,0.0017662101,0.00033996796,0.0015184456,0.006814365,0.0015464699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925793,0.003311623,0.00036586175,0.0006142811,0.0027708963,0.00035799478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068739853,0.000322889,0.00063065626,0.0029355742,0.013254653,0.008966642,0.002488753,0.004398325,0.004943077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014980429,0.0004547169,0.0005062647,0.003926326,0.043168884,0.0038504442,0.0031599428,0.009861299,0.0005079584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020450568,0.0000019785657,0.000101314945,0.000044747652,0.0000027247086,0.000021753342,0.001095796,0.00005794914,0.000033801432,0.9842613,0.006888144,0.0074885422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056615104,0.00001425715,0.0019979212,0.00047745678,0.000019909141,0.00012332565,0.001122979,0.00025680114,0.00028219924,0.21775113,0.7779024,0.00004590179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8435283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89611685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9368052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06319479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07481524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45851243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900012942","doi":"","title":"ON THE MEASURE OF DAMAGES IN SOLICITOR’S NEGLIGENCE CASES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Causation; Plaintiff; Appeal; Law; Contributory negligence; Context (archaeology); Punitive damages; Duty; Trilogy; Supreme court; Tort; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; History","score_opus":0.09468283474353169,"score_gpt":0.35206536308866804,"score_spread":0.25738252834513636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900012942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044632215,0.08953933,0.05838145,0.037311886,0.0015896916,0.0004945095,0.00086289,0.00010880081,0.76707923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94545,0.017557656,0.015738403,0.005192865,0.0013315482,0.00045544482,0.00025216874,0.00004122234,0.013980827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9454613,0.012842377,0.003385321,0.00291607,0.033320695,0.0020742828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96107525,0.02672691,0.003315562,0.0018596941,0.0063556787,0.00066684064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02907895,0.0010085016,0.0015747577,0.025905121,0.0041619022,0.00996492,0.0040681046,0.005064857,0.004600881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07682953,0.00058899063,0.0013713007,0.013736597,0.023338279,0.0078054015,0.004097323,0.0041459505,0.00050700404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009748939,0.000010828916,0.0009780229,0.00012546348,0.000039980445,0.000090634305,0.00040562186,0.000620779,0.0001014728,0.98590106,0.0030859069,0.008630574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020355123,0.00009643111,0.013631193,0.0017768883,0.0001399408,0.0005943989,0.0010406388,0.0029617844,0.0005649395,0.9139411,0.065141134,0.00009118358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06303824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08010928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93696177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022781968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16529554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900435752","doi":"10.1177/0269758018805567","title":"Making sense of the victim’s role in clemency decision making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Victimology","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Normative; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Process (computing); Democracy; Law; Political science; Poison control; Common sense; Sociology; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.032708343319008404,"score_gpt":0.4240235957114091,"score_spread":0.39131525239240067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900435752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35313138,0.007312942,0.04829477,0.06584229,0.0008048491,0.0002431812,0.00003801847,0.00007972323,0.52425283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897445,0.00086788146,0.0011977289,0.0022710215,0.000090125664,0.000042411186,0.000011343746,0.000015521868,0.0057593496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95781314,0.03188993,0.0007766839,0.0018614549,0.0037782134,0.003880595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625488,0.027075684,0.0045590326,0.0018964426,0.0020172421,0.0019028307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029819608,0.0006280638,0.0007913796,0.0036221053,0.013905296,0.017939307,0.0026595464,0.007989631,0.0070046773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04745426,0.00040724842,0.0006208985,0.0019766365,0.05208171,0.013003405,0.01411222,0.007006824,0.0006459077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032207696,0.00006601346,0.006880329,0.00012429524,0.00002975,0.0014073763,0.27119398,0.0002864561,0.00034567478,0.6995898,0.0027574818,0.017286537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019920855,0.00010024706,0.0070557245,0.0012799364,0.000042193817,0.001859457,0.52931595,0.0011567513,0.0008784094,0.3035651,0.15461461,0.00011172026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051796045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005623896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029819608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005098681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008625108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15770304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900472879","doi":"","title":"Being Specific About Specific Performance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Conveyancing; Property (philosophy); Business; Real property; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.016589812246572383,"score_gpt":0.2306612683809784,"score_spread":0.214071456134406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900472879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014786295,0.0047076126,0.011815962,0.076992534,0.0019444142,0.00008031348,0.00015387715,0.00016828063,0.88935065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5189674,0.00780506,0.0037408948,0.091002844,0.0048048454,0.00017559234,0.00038553763,0.00025687058,0.3728609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98152643,0.0031866708,0.0013482022,0.002103206,0.008236521,0.0035990449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841007,0.007373754,0.001712521,0.0017006756,0.004468943,0.0006434238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008669062,0.00072186923,0.0008967218,0.0012496142,0.0051989136,0.00721739,0.0017993854,0.012545894,0.014147817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025922297,0.0004377682,0.0012048148,0.0012160722,0.021038165,0.010307298,0.0047219377,0.010407076,0.0043807765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021789258,0.000015772175,0.00052292796,0.00012828223,0.0000110882365,0.00035579913,0.0041137924,0.00034877876,0.0006294045,0.94592834,0.03327112,0.01465294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012253872,0.000114874034,0.0027442074,0.0006973811,0.000037178692,0.001383961,0.0032968542,0.00024280923,0.0011830542,0.1441346,0.84607637,0.00007643596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019897357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018685158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019897357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053970646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010394453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047329187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900583480","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2012.11940abstract","title":"Antecedents and Consequences of Trust as an Emergent Group Property","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Diversity (politics); Group conflict; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; Homogeneous; Trustworthiness; Sociology","score_opus":0.04843096348530606,"score_gpt":0.34217963948126784,"score_spread":0.29374867599596177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900583480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890209,0.00006328512,0.0024806685,0.00046555226,0.000009311982,0.000036264002,0.000041070834,0.000010948604,0.007871952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964166,0.000014871953,0.0002508515,0.0000072473613,0.0000027210178,0.0000066222624,0.000010532487,0.0000012903952,0.000064180604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966473,0.0012979769,0.00027208915,0.00040713954,0.00076010707,0.00061530987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95424604,0.02157773,0.012274748,0.0042038267,0.002541395,0.0051562507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038475317,0.00024382958,0.00032484502,0.0012753705,0.0014108395,0.002002364,0.00036002192,0.00073902204,0.003947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03144547,0.00024876103,0.00043339984,0.00084890786,0.0040441323,0.0016006199,0.0021323692,0.0014786716,0.00015206507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020055442,0.00056385336,0.9471932,0.000072039686,0.00009858007,0.00071885437,0.005069205,0.002379883,0.0013803906,0.027817398,0.00027763058,0.014228493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003710318,0.0003222991,0.9310773,0.00006861235,0.0000873319,0.0005315976,0.008065624,0.010545437,0.00087013876,0.04729131,0.001061484,0.000041678166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037213727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004160094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015905094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015631685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020347893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900788814","doi":"","title":"TOWARDS A SINGULAR CONCEPT OF LEGAL PERSONALITY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Argument (complex analysis); Corporation; Natural person; Legal person; Legal certainty; Personality; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03880785455980722,"score_gpt":0.3242590011372247,"score_spread":0.2854511465774175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900788814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03926353,0.02621211,0.123549655,0.17181541,0.003814832,0.00018439119,0.0002983022,0.00020696218,0.63465476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90710866,0.010236645,0.03971558,0.016715985,0.0015526472,0.00017993631,0.00016375296,0.00008295788,0.024243938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99136716,0.003221613,0.00034461915,0.0008491535,0.0030953153,0.0011222304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898427,0.0022642503,0.0009632934,0.0008101234,0.0042652003,0.0018544536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010748159,0.0006273758,0.00073708815,0.0073126885,0.0077410126,0.010355703,0.0028020886,0.0028164096,0.0024726607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011321384,0.00035132255,0.000584373,0.0033841112,0.059890278,0.008922012,0.0054770717,0.007003033,0.000493417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020546572,0.000002790411,0.00025199866,0.000019479288,0.0000015730812,0.000018495653,0.0011672119,0.000035420315,0.000016087275,0.9940386,0.0012506989,0.0031955282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009586376,0.000015998281,0.0018907677,0.0003248482,0.00001107823,0.000117204145,0.003843733,0.0005125065,0.0000619967,0.8936855,0.099501595,0.000025151794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13626058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116840586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86373943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014788694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026065182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27093488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900996121","doi":"","title":"Why Does Lord Denning's Lead Balloon Intrigue Us Still? The Prospects of Finding a Unifying Principle for Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Adjudication; Freedom of contract; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Proposition; Common law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.021890438594362807,"score_gpt":0.30390265571095515,"score_spread":0.28201221711659236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900996121","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041441573,0.00825938,0.0025063164,0.9343311,0.0040099667,0.000012411058,0.000040818555,0.000037724974,0.046658047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28515813,0.0111811105,0.0056830957,0.6301103,0.0054000416,0.000109793866,0.00006486573,0.00020296915,0.062089764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298817,0.0026003337,0.00027209573,0.0012047127,0.0020603533,0.0008743117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99280894,0.004178512,0.00031877102,0.00048103664,0.0013424652,0.00087035395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075264145,0.00041537517,0.000786382,0.0010894217,0.007817553,0.008456428,0.0017945888,0.011719324,0.004067792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01900453,0.0003426508,0.0006541746,0.0010475212,0.025382455,0.009645698,0.0034723503,0.017587533,0.0015876761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025800802,0.00002082452,0.0005733358,0.000045363853,0.000006658957,0.00013337171,0.0022856663,0.0001049897,0.00006517386,0.78911847,0.1936806,0.0139398165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003594831,0.000029648207,0.0005061906,0.00030675856,0.000008371997,0.00019322737,0.0029490446,0.00031040004,0.00035739297,0.39073864,0.6045029,0.000061469495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022825455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02552024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022825455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00692476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005989563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0502429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901021339","doi":"","title":"DE LA RENONCIATION A UNE FIDUCIE PERSONNELLE","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Renunciation; Beneficiary; Trust law; Deed; Express trust; Property (philosophy); Institution; Law and economics; Testamentary trust; Law; Political science; Punitive damages; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04660194896805139,"score_gpt":0.3065957183954511,"score_spread":0.2599937694273997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901021339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030900598,0.073820956,0.015325196,0.15655734,0.0076420256,0.00022988922,0.00042352677,0.0002789212,0.7148216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52758944,0.014849561,0.005683483,0.050748724,0.001648694,0.00014596203,0.00011908746,0.00007947763,0.39913565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98513526,0.004015615,0.00058959646,0.0017581388,0.006068474,0.0024329333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890786,0.004052822,0.00078086706,0.0008077208,0.004675833,0.0006040542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121348,0.00057787634,0.00057802175,0.0016958961,0.010400096,0.007990621,0.0017619395,0.0073528257,0.0073464173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019727577,0.00062034954,0.0006822512,0.0014583333,0.013851249,0.0036082717,0.0022380394,0.008439974,0.0013237334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003225792,0.000013777496,0.0010765779,0.00018378407,0.000014140529,0.00033130983,0.004530851,0.00019904532,0.00039592324,0.888593,0.07354175,0.031087449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015678808,0.000037842856,0.0036102366,0.00032747543,0.000020362113,0.000265998,0.0010806707,0.00021700643,0.00038702757,0.019443406,0.97453636,0.00005796722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8462431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8781743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8462431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047954902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062874906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34793878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901983828","doi":"10.7202/1053848ar","title":"The Daunting Enterprise of the Law – Essays in Honour of Harry W. Arthurs, Edited by Simon Archer, Daniel Drache, and Peer Zumbansen, Montreal/Toronto: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 386 pages. ISBN: 978-0-7735-4890-9","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Queen (butterfly); Art history; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01632773223434718,"score_gpt":0.24712478155545806,"score_spread":0.23079704932111086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901983828","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092040026,0.6149799,0.0010951831,0.25522316,0.020968497,0.00002321515,0.00010732427,0.00006947784,0.10661274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05068477,0.48900744,0.0027742146,0.048773333,0.02666675,0.0001147361,0.00030155183,0.00038548658,0.38129172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963102,0.001501732,0.00016677067,0.0002852782,0.0014438333,0.00029218404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560696,0.0024391855,0.00037325872,0.0002649642,0.0010110191,0.00030468006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039847973,0.0011516765,0.00089082075,0.0021608286,0.004138159,0.008729632,0.0014350004,0.003956204,0.012559411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010312567,0.00078634004,0.00050494564,0.002295247,0.012795258,0.008584178,0.0026277094,0.006435443,0.0072150594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007963394,0.0000119702245,0.000065173685,0.00018897859,0.0000061487176,0.00006118316,0.0025456313,0.00005811358,0.000119020566,0.035521086,0.9238392,0.03757542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028696616,0.0000038890485,0.0003631651,0.00072513666,0.000002440477,0.00006853713,0.0019532943,0.000023918921,0.0000564168,0.015761444,0.9810286,0.000010312291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034498747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046178803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034498747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073954742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009863808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068595886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902547779","doi":"10.54648/erpl2018042","title":"Policy, Politics and Aesthetics in Non-American Private Law: A Comparative Study of Contract Performance Interruption","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Law and economics; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.038513491688415676,"score_gpt":0.35140605228986455,"score_spread":0.3128925606014489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902547779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76322156,0.00257345,0.0016031897,0.0073101823,0.000040630945,0.000028419641,0.000026561254,0.000015354393,0.2251805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969202,0.00035961118,0.0000858935,0.00024410138,0.000012614436,0.000008947381,0.0000065567647,0.000008361489,0.0023537043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993226,0.0034497732,0.00010227878,0.00038521498,0.0017175509,0.0011191868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98873526,0.007769275,0.0012221772,0.000645152,0.0010679836,0.0005602102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006716064,0.00014872866,0.00035415398,0.0019425303,0.011671329,0.01195209,0.0011986317,0.0024758172,0.005151489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009029734,0.00017367874,0.00020175186,0.004284665,0.028334828,0.004988377,0.0043327627,0.0035314553,0.00022449705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046243316,0.00014044433,0.0066471607,0.000071711765,0.000013357073,0.00037345965,0.319241,0.00031635887,0.00034441447,0.6492214,0.0025796979,0.021004824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023884751,0.00007750883,0.076127164,0.00045645837,0.00003325345,0.00031625922,0.6836141,0.0014787037,0.0004502971,0.059510667,0.17785321,0.000058429454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16219477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22508211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16219477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023592805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008816228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32250142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902813703","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v11n4p139","title":"The Third-Party Revocation Action System: Status Quo, Theoretical Controversy and Improvement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Civil procedure; Action (physics); Lawsuit; Law; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Third party; Political science; Status quo; Interlocutory; Business; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Appeal","score_opus":0.016635407988140276,"score_gpt":0.3231819574141499,"score_spread":0.3065465494260096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902813703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04767845,0.067441605,0.10324865,0.21475524,0.003619639,0.0003298369,0.00010074483,0.00020598802,0.56261986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9012013,0.026624028,0.022272771,0.010646448,0.0028309347,0.00045561136,0.00007161134,0.00009056606,0.035806708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889992,0.0047254576,0.0006240296,0.0019095225,0.002747627,0.0009942481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99074674,0.0049182423,0.0007172083,0.0012795397,0.0019202707,0.00041788313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017678954,0.00054024585,0.000782665,0.003002076,0.00534958,0.01268181,0.0035317976,0.008471507,0.0052677114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015371322,0.0004941947,0.0009909671,0.0029415607,0.03146039,0.019659065,0.004172233,0.006929448,0.000922315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030880794,0.0000067429914,0.000094675226,0.000033237364,0.0000011245652,0.000016292002,0.00023748272,0.00013740644,0.000018916346,0.9934663,0.0008289997,0.005155654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026653863,0.000049933213,0.00064335373,0.00031447722,0.000015147309,0.000118786455,0.0011235905,0.005374976,0.00024951895,0.9258806,0.066156425,0.000046582747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013980444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017678954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016074575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018692583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11662978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903015180","doi":"","title":"WHAT IS THE ROLE OF MISFEASANCE IN A PUBLIC OFFICE IN MODERN CANADIAN TORT LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Law; Estate; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.031296463108715734,"score_gpt":0.29419223446006504,"score_spread":0.2628957713513493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903015180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09828406,0.12768805,0.003517882,0.26847667,0.0014668189,0.00008779842,0.00040923207,0.00006999694,0.49999952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8607211,0.09053846,0.0018918524,0.018613582,0.00085360627,0.000028179687,0.000106922904,0.00005127434,0.027195035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258995,0.0006002901,0.00014564503,0.00062375783,0.003723005,0.0023172807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889846,0.002835929,0.0013946043,0.00030263411,0.005246179,0.0012360531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048261224,0.00048642856,0.0007862067,0.006908669,0.01580445,0.017364189,0.0025727372,0.0050409543,0.007432294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015760489,0.0005988277,0.00065117516,0.007119837,0.038474217,0.008472651,0.002898685,0.004516318,0.0005612088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025171506,0.000035043497,0.009885307,0.0004439854,0.000036039983,0.00061067566,0.014678619,0.00047506994,0.00026051592,0.89269876,0.02794942,0.052901503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003552451,0.000044192337,0.06363494,0.0027468067,0.00019084456,0.00118269,0.04155604,0.0010715435,0.00043527974,0.16564964,0.72317094,0.00028151277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14833377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14833377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12313783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903548177","doi":"","title":"THE TORT OF CONVERSION AND THE COLLECTING BANK: TEVA CANADA LTD V BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tort; Law; Vicarious liability; Supreme court; Nova scotia; Statutory law; Common law; Political science; Unjust enrichment; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.021087773566045444,"score_gpt":0.2733911320622001,"score_spread":0.25230335849615465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903548177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14495285,0.023303151,0.0023859157,0.12608016,0.0018762789,0.00021007025,0.001264825,0.000059358797,0.6998674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8366393,0.004955304,0.0009590016,0.036566176,0.00029975575,0.00007706304,0.00021021134,0.000024093,0.12026904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456173,0.0005942807,0.00018164732,0.00067048677,0.001987643,0.0020042423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972187,0.00096961495,0.00027929014,0.00019705085,0.00085615437,0.00047923834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002834428,0.00043130576,0.0004056374,0.0011986312,0.014381343,0.007685633,0.0020971578,0.011026084,0.0038978243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062813363,0.0005038941,0.0005144748,0.0016615647,0.010109265,0.0017702997,0.0024906027,0.006745002,0.00042134325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060255476,0.000023026067,0.00597189,0.00012212043,0.000031593794,0.0020626287,0.009596511,0.0003268957,0.0006002623,0.89492166,0.077626534,0.00865673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010318828,0.00005683836,0.061413415,0.0010475396,0.00015678973,0.0016935471,0.012431658,0.0008931092,0.0012911576,0.06808996,0.85256493,0.0002578914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.968876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046389565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046389565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06904596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3365814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904269756","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850397.003.0017","title":"Freedom of Testation and Family Claims in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Estate; Law; Statutory law; Obligation; Common law; Discretion; Political science; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Freedom of contract; Public law; Geography","score_opus":0.028757429299509796,"score_gpt":0.25118493123459334,"score_spread":0.22242750193508354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904269756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08921764,0.013269671,0.001462408,0.021521,0.0002503174,0.000045214954,0.00069511327,0.000038594964,0.8735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93427163,0.0036669015,0.0006030732,0.0011893708,0.000051084506,0.00001592644,0.00015101396,0.000017544331,0.06003337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798703,0.00025120942,0.000044170247,0.00014792816,0.00080488576,0.0007649171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971631,0.0010323195,0.00013733617,0.00015575353,0.000996765,0.00051473815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014963277,0.00021231794,0.0003372533,0.001846981,0.011997584,0.0073484797,0.0016922439,0.0019749552,0.010352902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040755533,0.00018884192,0.00029462943,0.0034007633,0.013438505,0.0014078082,0.0025481477,0.0021849752,0.00030428794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016014465,0.00001862303,0.0026999786,0.000047356752,0.000007045864,0.00027896062,0.009391234,0.000920841,0.00008641179,0.94410384,0.020836527,0.021593247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003393836,0.000018994711,0.030566702,0.00089873135,0.000039152397,0.00029434674,0.01972842,0.0034191706,0.00046402597,0.23442589,0.70999366,0.00011697891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99137187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99507105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110815786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110815786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10612303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8040286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904580877","doi":"","title":"Letting Agents: Servants of Two Masters?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Business; Principal (computer security); Servant; Law and economics; Fallacy; Property (philosophy); Law; Economics; Computer security; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02679810766988826,"score_gpt":0.3481945065756684,"score_spread":0.32139639890578015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904580877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08062298,0.002981318,0.01777413,0.1882569,0.0018041113,0.00011494499,0.00007891025,0.00022457818,0.70814216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7884262,0.0007124113,0.0026132101,0.02653107,0.0004712055,0.00008501155,0.00003765417,0.00012381122,0.18099953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959037,0.0018143653,0.0001032497,0.0005422012,0.00044560313,0.0011909354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753916,0.00049933087,0.00033582875,0.00028452819,0.0002943905,0.0010467252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004389166,0.00044926704,0.0004254563,0.00047408335,0.012254624,0.00933306,0.0009264479,0.0070326,0.022741469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006860486,0.00053689117,0.000397685,0.00038510567,0.018734409,0.015674032,0.006185452,0.00938447,0.00417091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023068089,0.000019309287,0.000527234,0.000012962516,0.0000022829045,0.00029199492,0.015577125,0.00002762253,0.00011754379,0.9649242,0.015006421,0.0034703095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035410954,0.00005153723,0.0006293219,0.00018574375,0.000009554026,0.0009799659,0.03713452,0.00059584423,0.00039508694,0.2777372,0.68221146,0.0000344142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00905921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012400749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022741469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037720737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041085635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07607776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905008473","doi":"","title":"OVERVIEW OF THE LAW OF BIDDING AND TENDERING","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Call for bids; Bidding; Mistake; Procurement; Business; Supreme court; Duty; Construction contract; Law and economics; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.09645502507909347,"score_gpt":0.34618132060989354,"score_spread":0.24972629553080006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905008473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025109884,0.30518153,0.016303629,0.033542622,0.0010697083,0.00016591216,0.00066996523,0.00011430108,0.6404414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18418914,0.5903583,0.021501508,0.019953636,0.0047505475,0.0004033404,0.0010225584,0.00017786025,0.17764316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938169,0.0009037403,0.00023002012,0.00041962668,0.0038955833,0.000734016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975374,0.00082639337,0.00016791745,0.00012853833,0.0011604418,0.00017931557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00365032,0.0007554726,0.00072758744,0.007936522,0.0055041793,0.008987764,0.0020542499,0.003782127,0.00843502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004760438,0.00087801105,0.0006377487,0.010756072,0.011154734,0.0042697643,0.0013448335,0.004760723,0.001997974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036318456,0.000012819526,0.00016754876,0.0001971913,0.000003143358,0.000055842153,0.00030301252,0.00048174124,0.000064250016,0.94847697,0.027390294,0.022843637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004013183,0.00001149185,0.001404774,0.00072145596,0.0000065292584,0.00009719567,0.00021611647,0.00060115627,0.00007283584,0.17773597,0.8191007,0.000027862246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69803154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6218449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30196846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05065469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045933183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60749364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905149855","doi":"","title":"INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS AND IRREPARABLE HARM IN THE FEDERAL COURTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Harm; Plaintiff; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Political science; High Court; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03042409735497193,"score_gpt":0.3312179239207884,"score_spread":0.3007938265658165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905149855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079660796,0.042995367,0.02339191,0.13679,0.00081228215,0.00016277854,0.00022284247,0.0001400971,0.7158239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96182567,0.0050316597,0.0045709284,0.009969431,0.00036311548,0.00005965621,0.000033959914,0.0000159953,0.018129464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97682536,0.005791261,0.0009625365,0.002178139,0.009081806,0.005160946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98997295,0.0045375205,0.0009866611,0.00077090587,0.003125932,0.00060599565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013873555,0.00039771743,0.0008662467,0.0047679576,0.01453521,0.010607863,0.0027117066,0.011050269,0.0030031663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018464874,0.0008233108,0.00092125364,0.0036533233,0.03304115,0.0040075895,0.0041804234,0.0072550084,0.00033228702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026211824,0.0000043312875,0.00020646802,0.000017800394,0.0000040350596,0.00004416186,0.0005899484,0.00013238486,0.00006238306,0.9943815,0.0017628116,0.0027915228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003227599,0.00003282525,0.0050665936,0.00052594853,0.000075810945,0.00013989481,0.0020826668,0.0010664103,0.0004015014,0.8646233,0.12586443,0.00008838921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66741645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7824043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33258355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05865448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074766956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66908437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905397250","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i1.1655","title":"UNDUE INFLUENCE: TOWARDS A UNIFYING CONCEPT OF UNCONSCIONABLITY?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Law; Legislature; Commonwealth; Political science; Parliament; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03659715602216373,"score_gpt":0.3503688528253154,"score_spread":0.31377169680315165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905397250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06020231,0.009997769,0.13594387,0.07411153,0.0013252947,0.00018556103,0.000066247485,0.00008768218,0.7180798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820216,0.0015419102,0.003964427,0.0047587054,0.0007769751,0.00013614033,0.000015217903,0.00003606345,0.0067489776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98583,0.0054470147,0.0006823914,0.0015683107,0.0044998596,0.00197235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866679,0.0083502345,0.0015121201,0.0013676744,0.0013179943,0.0007840229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010156567,0.0006061372,0.0011367595,0.0032848842,0.0058135595,0.013738593,0.0041116416,0.011021832,0.0034088613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024637185,0.00045075215,0.000834033,0.0020481308,0.080807656,0.018326785,0.010793214,0.00940399,0.00045741705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002112458,0.0000037399657,0.00017267595,0.000006303953,0.0000019521735,0.000052230145,0.0009885929,0.00006840459,0.00001844677,0.9970872,0.00017677709,0.0014216317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008419197,0.000023132896,0.00066339085,0.00011761171,0.000011818406,0.000158428,0.0015816458,0.0007147297,0.000121653204,0.9777154,0.01885975,0.000024185152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005916078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004591945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013738593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060923365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057164184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05371374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905530015","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title Claims to Private Land and the Legal Relevance of Disruptive Effects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Political science; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Dilemma; Private property; Property rights; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0105404602020888,"score_gpt":0.3509990986865406,"score_spread":0.3404586384844518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905530015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46020287,0.010797838,0.0026720648,0.022975082,0.0002240244,0.000039294362,0.000054451586,0.000054259373,0.5029801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809895,0.0014307013,0.00026026383,0.0010403487,0.00006735473,0.000010428599,0.000010178825,0.000009707867,0.016181432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555284,0.000989399,0.00014243547,0.00042045006,0.0014717539,0.0014231878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202406,0.004350945,0.0010295882,0.0007283874,0.0013184946,0.00054859684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027374588,0.00022327369,0.00042044715,0.0015390042,0.012811796,0.012656491,0.0027606715,0.005588348,0.003114329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009110102,0.00048962346,0.00032782488,0.0011500749,0.036779817,0.0031934269,0.0052965414,0.005098183,0.00020455684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038935992,0.000038394763,0.01095161,0.00010196644,0.000030053106,0.00441655,0.041634753,0.00070777966,0.000807428,0.91896677,0.004196572,0.018109165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006506374,0.00014735991,0.08906241,0.0013464347,0.0002656116,0.004179556,0.11702498,0.00409098,0.0021336987,0.49757773,0.28389245,0.00021370474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56703115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43296885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022377359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012449583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87103736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907805986","doi":"","title":"What Was That Thing You Said? The New Zealand Supreme Court's Vexing Vector Gas Decision","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Guardian; High Court; Duty; Political science; Position (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Majority opinion; History; Economics","score_opus":0.06791224060157657,"score_gpt":0.31864297569079436,"score_spread":0.2507307350892178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907805986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032328397,0.0052091586,0.0020465709,0.6760519,0.0037182034,0.000035101613,0.00015480796,0.000040696923,0.28041506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63828117,0.0034863455,0.0025970833,0.24276502,0.0014386609,0.000058305563,0.00010039722,0.000067937464,0.11120497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911481,0.0017071958,0.00031300948,0.0010585643,0.0041241804,0.0016489668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702185,0.0010648587,0.00019767895,0.00011225595,0.0011921463,0.0004112485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006318719,0.00029078173,0.00044339403,0.0008018604,0.010651199,0.012780209,0.001425391,0.010197281,0.003795355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016937224,0.0003259581,0.00045351827,0.0009186053,0.014775178,0.005630561,0.0025768357,0.0129366955,0.00056462653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024157724,0.000013354873,0.0018344783,0.000049009726,0.000018875537,0.0005763102,0.006761424,0.0002112665,0.00041551262,0.7970269,0.1795146,0.01355408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035701603,0.000043640557,0.003947596,0.00038111952,0.000041542866,0.00031913485,0.01546369,0.00068332214,0.0007145375,0.16014692,0.81809366,0.00012921012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5362422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55719984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5362422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019054022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019321188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.932978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910431864","doi":"10.5840/croatjphil201818332","title":"An Anscombean Reference for ‘I’?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024196081905342816,"score_gpt":0.27480805927239627,"score_spread":0.25061197736705343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910431864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0360905,0.003252284,0.079099275,0.054200936,0.0023079615,0.00008186477,0.0002516085,0.00061740377,0.8240982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86357313,0.0010190244,0.015403246,0.011083496,0.000491606,0.0001277937,0.00016684186,0.00057960406,0.10755532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464285,0.0025401926,0.00021581064,0.0012591713,0.00085601024,0.00048599645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963973,0.001270244,0.00028503145,0.0010153349,0.00087618874,0.00015583115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043520676,0.0005783389,0.0006577872,0.0011540942,0.0050053517,0.0075340946,0.0017637878,0.0052059046,0.01118767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113811465,0.00050613924,0.0004762464,0.0014384113,0.019701742,0.015402075,0.00553179,0.005003013,0.0031420265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009312425,0.000003002347,0.00017987621,0.00001852465,0.0000028349878,0.00007166755,0.018317902,0.00000935228,0.0001953497,0.97366244,0.004692656,0.0028371934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014552058,0.000033841647,0.000997097,0.0002621136,0.000023178247,0.0007021424,0.020581463,0.00045612568,0.0012307469,0.37681,0.5988274,0.00006137271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01294186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011226385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01294186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034529755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002039442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03742647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910883856","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0079","title":"Voicing the market: Extending the ambition of contract theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Value (mathematics); Centrality; Morality; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Economics; Government (linguistics); Contract theory; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.008238026037929214,"score_gpt":0.23779649265686761,"score_spread":0.2295584666189384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910883856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023902513,0.03291363,0.14701498,0.21729301,0.0017130205,0.00010233161,0.00011286748,0.00012723175,0.57682055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92672235,0.014863452,0.022410836,0.014263227,0.0027054164,0.00022922379,0.00004885043,0.00014284569,0.01861388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873153,0.007195599,0.00032057386,0.001049945,0.0030940361,0.0010245433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793467,0.015343403,0.00084492646,0.0015347465,0.0017487984,0.0011814329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016239267,0.00061099813,0.0013361031,0.0024909284,0.009052445,0.014789819,0.0025617846,0.010313755,0.004117417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016574204,0.00061818113,0.0010422633,0.0024755122,0.092480324,0.016186113,0.0063275998,0.0106830085,0.00077119033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011053198,0.0000017527647,0.00001571019,0.000006463585,5.743655e-7,0.000009888307,0.00033824143,0.00008770241,0.0000047391804,0.9985154,0.00034922324,0.00066916423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046423006,0.0000039799675,0.00004396795,0.00004979049,0.0000011806665,0.000014315421,0.0002816329,0.00050309947,0.00001419424,0.98296887,0.016109534,0.000004905258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024114203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012461818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024114203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02119065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016986424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15374964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911675534","doi":"","title":"Book Review: The Use and Abuse of Unjust Enrichment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Relation (database); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026631082356505725,"score_gpt":0.29265782325839484,"score_spread":0.2660267409018891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911675534","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025222913,0.8151004,0.00056420005,0.08557621,0.053092696,0.00002901754,0.00021062777,0.00007004484,0.045104522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009248699,0.72356224,0.0010653312,0.07394072,0.054220926,0.00014009839,0.00031576268,0.00020505021,0.13730119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967559,0.0010813156,0.00019717833,0.0002154046,0.0016362545,0.000113957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987895,0.0074711298,0.0007964973,0.0003949995,0.0030752236,0.00036711904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002430234,0.00053302076,0.0011809432,0.0031158333,0.000839806,0.0046885842,0.0010246768,0.002620592,0.01827513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021695375,0.00039090763,0.00039414913,0.004002604,0.00224374,0.0032634062,0.0012854708,0.0034628378,0.008685063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063519215,0.0000031505856,0.000022107359,0.00048417758,0.00000760029,0.000017413171,0.000058680915,0.000028136968,0.000030023692,0.005463829,0.96345025,0.030428376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003758238,0.000006596631,0.00012550248,0.0012349365,0.0000071800637,0.000111450085,0.000045015393,0.00001898407,0.00002604121,0.0020900161,0.99632543,0.000005118462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029924377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008374207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01827513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024659259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038531793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061136425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912072546","doi":"","title":"Gordon Tullock's Critique of the Common Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018654737026704227,"score_gpt":0.26164629268463385,"score_spread":0.24299155565792963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912072546","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059074494,0.044443674,0.0152080795,0.5159063,0.0037941625,0.000035996687,0.00020333765,0.0000654857,0.41443557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5945234,0.026607867,0.0091111,0.21340646,0.011025903,0.00038988728,0.00016743179,0.0002857783,0.14448227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343914,0.0030064415,0.00019652036,0.0009469323,0.0018724119,0.0005385949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353737,0.0050495546,0.00025320705,0.0003243838,0.00059968693,0.00023585404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048824186,0.0006716509,0.0007723354,0.0022233129,0.007734766,0.007683909,0.0018806071,0.009478959,0.005261486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012908734,0.00042095868,0.0005988685,0.0026614012,0.038810324,0.009998092,0.0037992531,0.014087972,0.0012562955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002982911,0.000002924011,0.000025059038,0.000008450061,8.6342567e-7,0.000012581264,0.00043085715,0.00004831099,0.0000066640396,0.98054093,0.017800244,0.0011200856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001136977,0.0000039834986,0.000110384455,0.000139192,0.0000022481947,0.00003460628,0.00034691257,0.00018519867,0.000037422633,0.8354616,0.16365695,0.000010137231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024569727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016554264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024569727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00981351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066458113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07120228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912520768","doi":"","title":"THE OPPRESSION REMEDY","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Plaintiff; CLARITY; Law; Corporation; Political science; Statutory law; Harm; Statute; Sociology; Terminology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05423227589189154,"score_gpt":0.36860260135828327,"score_spread":0.3143703254663917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912520768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064930976,0.0038707387,0.03357497,0.029302167,0.0025914619,0.0003043326,0.00021473535,0.0004141517,0.92323434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3899158,0.0072670076,0.035012383,0.07094641,0.0024396784,0.00080202933,0.00038280286,0.00036990372,0.49286392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834843,0.0029770294,0.0010296584,0.0023623572,0.008283592,0.0018630183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935777,0.0018805485,0.000663492,0.0017089717,0.0017157407,0.0004533985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006595102,0.00091935747,0.0009860571,0.001950434,0.006247976,0.008279964,0.003073417,0.011330504,0.023412617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015983215,0.0006348753,0.0012167316,0.00081989804,0.016431168,0.00743076,0.010694081,0.013517402,0.007230662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009491328,0.000026983358,0.00020580538,0.00006751816,0.0000096616695,0.00025552558,0.00050995155,0.00013068903,0.00050328876,0.9568751,0.020812012,0.020593943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026131182,0.00010190418,0.0006720608,0.0006688023,0.0000415752,0.0012925003,0.0007590842,0.00042890746,0.0021848304,0.30577105,0.68798727,0.000065950146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040411665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050161877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030515478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0101366155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07832301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914737984","doi":"","title":"ENTIRE AGREEMENT CLAUSES: NEITHER RIDDLE NOR ENIGMA","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Agreement; Law; Law and economics; Res ipsa loquitur; Exclusion clause; Political science; Economics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Tort; Liability; Contract management","score_opus":0.0449347226490299,"score_gpt":0.33354256167615187,"score_spread":0.28860783902712195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914737984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030480362,0.05208258,0.068567865,0.32431102,0.0031082828,0.0001825291,0.00043744966,0.00022192688,0.520608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7554459,0.031093158,0.021386443,0.091162406,0.0030966008,0.0001723457,0.00033028942,0.00023152093,0.097081386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986893,0.0025026412,0.0005036711,0.0016902434,0.006664278,0.0017462457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985314,0.0073944363,0.0011031224,0.0018358165,0.0038317936,0.0005206701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012004069,0.00037667574,0.00076092326,0.0018716484,0.007062835,0.010718863,0.004629727,0.0074380757,0.006191608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024114886,0.0005752641,0.0006957136,0.0025861016,0.04121692,0.018556654,0.0041898647,0.011467532,0.0009951276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036580439,0.0000024201725,0.00013439942,0.00003520063,0.000004175801,0.000045216864,0.0013221428,0.000048548754,0.00003532135,0.97900003,0.009957939,0.009411017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010678272,0.000010825555,0.00075748883,0.0005471627,0.00002680879,0.00031157176,0.0036314449,0.0003548855,0.00023388852,0.5629355,0.43114367,0.000036058245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31260064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40923652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31260064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014607926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030788453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62156224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915564683","doi":"","title":"Le droit au respect de la vie privée : les défis digitaux, une perspective de droit comparé (The Right to Respect for Private Life: Digital Challenges, A Comparative Law Perspective)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Right to privacy; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.025954726031593007,"score_gpt":0.3305037714982752,"score_spread":0.3045490454666822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915564683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05068434,0.025748838,0.0050281924,0.05596189,0.00039976058,0.00003217371,0.00030662722,0.000030497382,0.86180764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8945588,0.006402149,0.0009940435,0.0060498277,0.00028175005,0.00006259599,0.00008214053,0.00003755041,0.091531105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522084,0.0019863814,0.0001591071,0.00067460135,0.0010466436,0.00091247924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779725,0.0012411315,0.00020322473,0.00020401157,0.00040512902,0.00014917765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032010893,0.000334496,0.00041477216,0.0021067176,0.010200842,0.018409293,0.0009044666,0.0045627425,0.013294457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038879504,0.0002257353,0.00035710254,0.00333294,0.022333145,0.007088061,0.0038961489,0.0033921616,0.0008789741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000772947,0.0000032887017,0.00017975457,0.000027629398,0.0000018339065,0.000037464015,0.0045267446,0.00005518257,0.00004865852,0.98961496,0.00231165,0.003184979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021996824,0.000046051446,0.0055635762,0.00066548877,0.00002208831,0.00023860016,0.024236083,0.00030173652,0.00047385195,0.22987075,0.73851275,0.000047110134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22841068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19678646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22841068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02419638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010235217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4541623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916090380","doi":"","title":"Tenant Fees Bill: Good Intentions – Weak Protections","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Landlord; Enforcement; Principal (computer security); Business; Agency (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.01851767248168436,"score_gpt":0.297810397481606,"score_spread":0.27929272499992164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916090380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019922685,0.0023571723,0.013665513,0.2625687,0.0041113244,0.00029095935,0.00039053892,0.00061914127,0.6960739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2784857,0.0015813861,0.010684776,0.17500493,0.0023690567,0.00041805906,0.00039654295,0.0005900189,0.53046954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984568,0.0032346267,0.00091759604,0.001354147,0.0076902425,0.0022353367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98936135,0.0038124395,0.0006646515,0.0019308679,0.0031992558,0.0010314859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013803015,0.00065526186,0.0006727243,0.001302457,0.0057287524,0.01418117,0.0022746008,0.014420691,0.018439649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041935973,0.00073815446,0.00080273807,0.001139516,0.009930575,0.010148502,0.005108625,0.0141018685,0.0070161563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036311307,0.000046129466,0.00045917954,0.000037585087,0.00000440528,0.00014903703,0.0009219683,0.00009746097,0.0003449783,0.88873315,0.09633196,0.012837887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004726278,0.00007613432,0.001630265,0.0002588257,0.000017018576,0.00024648756,0.0006676396,0.00062692387,0.0005881081,0.14288844,0.8528886,0.000064173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019922763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017676676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019922763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005008604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00906634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072998226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916203628","doi":"","title":"OBSERVATIONS SUR LA CONCEPTION JUDICIAIRE DU ROLE DE LA JUSTICE CONTRACTUELLE EN MATIERE D’HYPOTHEQUE CONVENTIONNELLE","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Legislator; Economic Justice; Creditor; Payment; Law; Business; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Civil code; Debt; Legislation; Sociology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.021675024050635285,"score_gpt":0.28885294365165926,"score_spread":0.267177919601024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916203628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020800427,0.039249685,0.07088772,0.17498823,0.0017386845,0.00015725916,0.00025910547,0.0001312568,0.6917877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547152,0.016313002,0.029087571,0.03132419,0.0027203385,0.00034504983,0.000112480644,0.0001759969,0.06520609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727596,0.010682266,0.00096453744,0.003034774,0.009557102,0.003001687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711929,0.01802002,0.0013703643,0.0021058028,0.006453369,0.0008575062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029576937,0.0006233485,0.0010160054,0.0039025818,0.01336115,0.012567617,0.0033998438,0.0084929615,0.005066919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030715229,0.0007410135,0.0011303062,0.003599609,0.07299889,0.009324357,0.0023431045,0.019206451,0.00069622666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014475289,0.0000019730167,0.000038126745,0.000010228191,0.0000017627442,0.000012074281,0.0008853384,0.00008046001,0.000019124365,0.9967014,0.0015634865,0.00068446243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029013872,0.000013687744,0.0013581556,0.00030610114,0.000009881956,0.000086622065,0.0015122825,0.0009261768,0.00025028377,0.80360174,0.19185103,0.00005508003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5450854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43719453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45491463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057442307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0402524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9151874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917835795","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Government: Provenance, Promise, and Pitfalls","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law and economics; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Obligation; Politics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.0075326107140314446,"score_gpt":0.27032730079410805,"score_spread":0.2627946900800766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917835795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03273263,0.016913382,0.0770214,0.31987104,0.0027944404,0.000086465356,0.00014826594,0.00016467168,0.5502677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538102,0.004841785,0.0067338366,0.010328737,0.0018242156,0.00011572789,0.00006179546,0.00016383998,0.02211991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98324984,0.009011193,0.00060828624,0.0021703423,0.0038529772,0.0011073169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671358,0.022621758,0.0013725858,0.00531967,0.002922436,0.0006278566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02598719,0.00037158147,0.0009915809,0.0019641425,0.012181475,0.018895136,0.0022889844,0.009030238,0.004711464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061400708,0.0006587216,0.0006428331,0.0030281863,0.079151794,0.03156718,0.008394504,0.014553601,0.0009957739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002129266,0.0000014582474,0.000037961436,0.000004700892,6.535664e-7,0.000008594554,0.0008010646,0.00003084651,0.0000044614117,0.99655104,0.0010271043,0.0015300701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038070632,0.0000033659494,0.000059413505,0.00006778308,0.0000028135255,0.000024716503,0.00059467414,0.0001750814,0.000043966313,0.9755229,0.023495348,0.0000060715324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075209457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005681003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02598719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010565772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010880846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13743508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918031632","doi":"10.1515/npf-2019-0003","title":"Editor’s Note for Issue 9(4)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.013598825417559217,"score_gpt":0.36484411543040507,"score_spread":0.3512452900128459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918031632","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008995909,0.0009350622,0.00021567059,0.11599937,0.8694059,0.00009933774,0.0002887054,0.00024705732,0.012718906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001200034,0.0015301397,0.00039055417,0.24249837,0.6425251,0.00022522699,0.0002428086,0.00019844912,0.11118936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965479,0.00029776795,0.0003249217,0.0005692306,0.0017497739,0.0005104857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98971456,0.0025178902,0.00065959786,0.00062897924,0.00483227,0.0016466469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003449166,0.0018725947,0.0017311967,0.0016409251,0.0034163827,0.008034187,0.0040532174,0.02261412,0.09472747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018787146,0.00082789926,0.0025063977,0.0013974865,0.0019151615,0.004005097,0.0021599445,0.0168679,0.066257626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011770838,0.000015811955,0.000044511136,0.000048386384,0.0000030073732,0.0000584392,0.0000068807817,0.0000109963485,0.000043344204,0.0002524707,0.99548376,0.004020591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020814876,0.0000117872405,0.00037585988,0.00014813592,0.000005333043,0.00004700691,0.000024724406,0.000059561477,0.000071336006,0.00056942296,0.99865603,0.000009977928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034568075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064407717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09472747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023960639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00398638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31689495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918728312","doi":"","title":"Making Dishonesty Fit the Crime","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dishonesty; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Statutory law; Tribunal; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04813407800908747,"score_gpt":0.36773419288934645,"score_spread":0.31960011488025897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918728312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10924956,0.0048677553,0.02941441,0.095179036,0.0025778324,0.0001734198,0.00014387445,0.00011824039,0.75827587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88346463,0.0017347889,0.0036153416,0.027158631,0.000680887,0.00010502001,0.000049651622,0.00011685377,0.08307417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893798,0.0031298772,0.0005618294,0.0017426821,0.0033835522,0.0018022428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894509,0.0050875125,0.0008809522,0.0019090569,0.0017541042,0.0009175002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006536976,0.00058741675,0.0007583452,0.0011934867,0.008219056,0.01311023,0.0015496669,0.010938215,0.0065764943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024355093,0.0007508093,0.0006089845,0.00070163864,0.035384532,0.010389305,0.008399249,0.016719906,0.0019061537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002802578,0.000030207528,0.0017844171,0.000045955017,0.000008284531,0.0010027137,0.008346825,0.0002531893,0.00035482054,0.9635486,0.010904054,0.013692891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039830655,0.00013820227,0.006653995,0.0012292111,0.00004781306,0.0024281107,0.016398527,0.0014186803,0.0012812676,0.7073643,0.26282012,0.00017990009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03244237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06220816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03244237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00560296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007602278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06450707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918876867","doi":"","title":"ABORIGINAL TITLE: THE CHIPPEWAS OF SARNIA","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Fallacy; Appeal; Law; High Court; Surrender; Equity (law); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03568701721323528,"score_gpt":0.3321455949587789,"score_spread":0.2964585777455436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918876867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015957866,0.008297908,0.0002885022,0.021693848,0.0029285355,0.00011933494,0.000540096,0.000051000843,0.95012283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10338375,0.0036566195,0.0004494293,0.018918203,0.0005580171,0.00007269625,0.0002105368,0.000035983066,0.8727147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897027,0.00008624498,0.000032288674,0.00015354053,0.00038143466,0.00037625272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991874,0.00014493651,0.000053043863,0.000047283273,0.00043681866,0.00013052653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008115167,0.00030099176,0.00023806252,0.0006030497,0.00723735,0.0027121736,0.0008134158,0.0024880462,0.02658442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017363045,0.00029594582,0.00021025604,0.0006239777,0.0018181249,0.00056449743,0.001330773,0.0036986857,0.0035816145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009659852,0.000038129212,0.0030593027,0.0005360507,0.000023302406,0.0015380536,0.016824594,0.000095917356,0.0020747236,0.2942255,0.65019274,0.031295158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064133524,0.00001946946,0.0060669524,0.00011653236,0.000010710589,0.00017545157,0.0017124771,0.000020641026,0.00033738944,0.0009325679,0.990589,0.000012377478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66417366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84626406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33582634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007946192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017289722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67560816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918878418","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v8n1p30","title":"Modernising English Land Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Land law; English law; Law; Political science; Geography; Land tenure; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11226999000711509,"score_gpt":0.46180734235249965,"score_spread":0.3495373523453846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918878418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039466564,0.020180179,0.021178663,0.062021993,0.0023404108,0.000082793194,0.00017780463,0.00014898469,0.85440254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67656577,0.014584973,0.016697237,0.012803141,0.0025825764,0.00014113553,0.0001888042,0.000256065,0.2761802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954652,0.0020381766,0.0002246758,0.0005227055,0.0012235773,0.00052570377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668616,0.00141931,0.00018134226,0.00058036053,0.0010004366,0.00013248812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005094322,0.0004300257,0.00050393975,0.0019357261,0.0029532223,0.0069414875,0.0008374757,0.0026029365,0.0121674705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008260668,0.0003491304,0.00030748206,0.0012210849,0.009998866,0.007771325,0.0040331003,0.0050347396,0.0019423926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050970316,0.000019925696,0.00024239675,0.000058521164,0.0000034340617,0.00006211843,0.004315136,0.00013111676,0.00016207412,0.96874654,0.0070030843,0.019250495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009701204,0.0000346806,0.0016207523,0.0003019427,0.000011709455,0.00013860405,0.0034185469,0.00035362123,0.00046085002,0.3588009,0.63482815,0.000020478617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012271004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018556057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012271004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006556002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052404124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047567368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918984292","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198817659.003.0007","title":"The Constitution of Equity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Constitution; Economics","score_opus":0.09562566374570758,"score_gpt":0.3652651595371599,"score_spread":0.2696394957914523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918984292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050342614,0.0026686448,0.008902285,0.010130067,0.00025802097,0.00003254316,0.00008447956,0.000027532686,0.97286224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76472193,0.003853427,0.005465095,0.00652012,0.0009940906,0.0003030929,0.0001819344,0.00010434161,0.21785589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973966,0.0009727825,0.00006902348,0.00037088952,0.0007869056,0.0004037884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987676,0.0006535526,0.00006843537,0.00021255891,0.00020962462,0.0000881141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023880145,0.00037073722,0.00040370354,0.0012514652,0.003440057,0.0074383956,0.00070460036,0.0024700335,0.011979472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004068331,0.0002600607,0.00031591512,0.0009164936,0.021883612,0.0053956853,0.0037274184,0.0045313453,0.0012057045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6057315e-7,6.57255e-7,0.000007357261,0.0000015988343,2.3980738e-7,0.0000031110415,0.00007064341,0.000023836797,0.0000074335007,0.99892056,0.0005862717,0.00037780846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041811604,0.000003282181,0.00007145718,0.000055819088,0.0000016307974,0.000018469958,0.00014626129,0.0001672717,0.00007548751,0.9095075,0.08994536,0.0000033064603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039737625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002630997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011979472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054938137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033409551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040075302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919392835","doi":"10.7202/1056326ar","title":"Le crédit-bail et la vente à tempérament dans le Code civil du Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011183005586591944,"score_gpt":0.2532275726857197,"score_spread":0.24204456709912778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919392835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76117224,0.0016931391,0.004995944,0.015209797,0.0000894176,0.00008901804,0.0012663525,0.000028537801,0.21545555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786466,0.00030734224,0.000601319,0.00028100915,0.000011381977,0.000016925393,0.00009623351,0.0000057358125,0.020033529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987399,0.00022951928,0.000041378433,0.00015241223,0.0004585645,0.00037810093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966967,0.0008458023,0.00043866565,0.0001501347,0.0014777756,0.00039092905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012500826,0.00015770775,0.0001872794,0.0009977401,0.0035952625,0.0023163368,0.00056475226,0.0006548973,0.008611728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053217122,0.00017670909,0.0002109655,0.0013468985,0.0046543214,0.0007348182,0.000915818,0.0010427883,0.00022900177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012064578,0.00005941291,0.28480807,0.00014565961,0.00006233299,0.00043027918,0.031790223,0.003263425,0.001203489,0.6246857,0.011880408,0.041550457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003168975,0.00006228217,0.8295644,0.0002628938,0.000059583403,0.000097976794,0.018769288,0.003845554,0.0007294122,0.026988665,0.11948789,0.000100443925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043115146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043115146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042722512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31282377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919726698","doi":"10.1017/lst.2019.6","title":"Revisiting the fraud exception: a critique of United City Merchants v Royal Bank of Canada 40 years on","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Underpinning; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04464865428380113,"score_gpt":0.337203370805331,"score_spread":0.29255471652152987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919726698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045809317,0.027264593,0.0049262233,0.5662522,0.0037855664,0.00009042419,0.00034397058,0.00014468994,0.3513831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6751427,0.011600214,0.00227161,0.24440151,0.003872746,0.00008581465,0.00008712414,0.00015213354,0.062386144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97927845,0.0028219277,0.00074655924,0.0024655482,0.01087506,0.0038124642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761084,0.010749434,0.0009869284,0.00081918266,0.009818987,0.0015170389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013014113,0.0005906448,0.0011124897,0.0053912164,0.0236512,0.020054005,0.0058476846,0.021520728,0.0025930763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03354197,0.00075738673,0.0009823836,0.004829275,0.044631112,0.0059748394,0.0047458373,0.029833967,0.0004220041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013721616,0.0000070873643,0.0005881633,0.000034114477,0.0000121526555,0.00034115958,0.00592693,0.00023320153,0.00006886682,0.9421368,0.04589037,0.0047473675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049142298,0.00002863019,0.004297743,0.0016074177,0.00011609101,0.00023837782,0.009459143,0.001547247,0.0005646039,0.18927313,0.7925794,0.00023901043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9663975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11594479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13935393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84124225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921013079","doi":"10.3366/elr.2019.0571","title":"The Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Performance: A Scottish-Canadian Comparison","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Good faith; Honesty; Duty; Law; Fair dealing; Faith; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.022953268273611438,"score_gpt":0.3342424241363495,"score_spread":0.3112891558627381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921013079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19353582,0.015809903,0.002729144,0.03698008,0.00043502738,0.00014141359,0.0005784365,0.000053289004,0.7497368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782913,0.0041925474,0.0006443791,0.0023893984,0.000051305415,0.000023320234,0.00012019079,0.000021505948,0.0142661175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831215,0.0024140044,0.00048085875,0.00074211555,0.008615303,0.0046262727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854798,0.0031515937,0.00081046525,0.0006536753,0.008484294,0.001420131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01068755,0.00041918753,0.00062228594,0.005276366,0.01991641,0.008673312,0.0021010162,0.0022887231,0.0060729184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018758291,0.0002989461,0.00080201286,0.008374832,0.014867272,0.002120408,0.0040307837,0.0035797276,0.00031862743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014440356,0.000056076973,0.009809619,0.00020763517,0.00006109331,0.0005676806,0.026929827,0.000484106,0.0003751961,0.8993799,0.015089878,0.04689455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012723437,0.00025096678,0.2648753,0.0010489261,0.00022516673,0.00067453197,0.05793348,0.0017932702,0.0010063018,0.08390617,0.58773845,0.00042013862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98427653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0888538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0888538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089215055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6446824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921566010","doi":"10.7202/1056817ar","title":"Specific Performance in the Civil Law: Mediating Between Inconsistent Principles Inherited from a Roman-Canonical Tradition via the French Astreinte and the Québec Injunction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Civil code; Debtor; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Obligation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Conscience; Unjust enrichment; Civil procedure; Order (exchange); Philosophy; History; Public law; Restitution; Business; Creditor; Debt","score_opus":0.024811971199831764,"score_gpt":0.2369441141896023,"score_spread":0.2121321429897705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921566010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10790609,0.0031299684,0.013071506,0.018652031,0.00025338298,0.000059238875,0.00010825627,0.000115811315,0.8567037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635494,0.0006958738,0.0013893837,0.0014538832,0.000052946634,0.000023783941,0.000034463646,0.00003894167,0.032761335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363315,0.0018396671,0.00017994222,0.0009713619,0.0019645314,0.0014113991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963947,0.0009438555,0.00032023003,0.00047660785,0.001455015,0.00040959803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041819084,0.0006925902,0.00053253275,0.0014681701,0.010594549,0.011580611,0.0017537762,0.003849177,0.0057997494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075730253,0.00033119338,0.00047451086,0.0016264747,0.03695629,0.004096852,0.0045739794,0.005547157,0.00047317165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010373226,0.000009148433,0.00073505583,0.000012189484,0.0000057830375,0.00012194478,0.005487175,0.00021455887,0.000119350996,0.985319,0.001747254,0.0062181107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062548665,0.00011293903,0.028787445,0.00089333224,0.0001027307,0.00058534247,0.025805214,0.0038138141,0.0013056821,0.3631944,0.57508624,0.0002502593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87280107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87946683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12719893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06539489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04193678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47447538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921568760","doi":"","title":"JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Tort; Private law; Precedent; Common law; Charter; Public law; Liability","score_opus":0.051531622556219125,"score_gpt":0.3382382600379025,"score_spread":0.2867066374816834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921568760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032041363,0.018968971,0.0040677413,0.22912763,0.0010676679,0.00008920558,0.00006840059,0.000042987966,0.714526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8939887,0.0066544563,0.0013814651,0.042936977,0.0019784414,0.00009947553,0.000059512393,0.000039103692,0.052861907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98000425,0.0068786945,0.00042684685,0.0021488585,0.0064510247,0.004090327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97722715,0.014848027,0.001322297,0.0013356606,0.0031452782,0.0021215254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02039021,0.00026502833,0.0006277311,0.0029984526,0.013777659,0.014019252,0.0013648662,0.009746666,0.0063419887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02808913,0.00047193922,0.0004553645,0.002029169,0.03261781,0.004190207,0.0065193176,0.009972128,0.0004986616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005088467,0.000015854435,0.000371048,0.000038722777,0.000006282561,0.00005903376,0.0031384258,0.00010547174,0.00014408032,0.9639999,0.021097438,0.011018534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048205842,0.000020594402,0.0035993743,0.0005738262,0.000022791837,0.00007036206,0.003463089,0.00052195747,0.0005071651,0.43618047,0.554964,0.000028137561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17609134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26406556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17609134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023133533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040708534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35013276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921704861","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500001062","title":"L'Administration du bien d'autrui.","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Psychology; Humanities; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018188553115926837,"score_gpt":0.3172454862448181,"score_spread":0.29905693312889126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921704861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067420127,0.04730341,0.0066995504,0.051918134,0.012495167,0.00028216143,0.005269175,0.0037314263,0.8655588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04740087,0.009300451,0.005328592,0.0046310867,0.0014116954,0.000352728,0.0015529537,0.0009244735,0.9290971],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932869,0.0016363245,0.000282817,0.00084721064,0.0030876442,0.00085918896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954756,0.0013784864,0.00037075108,0.0006430562,0.0014841065,0.0006480868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051241396,0.0012368155,0.001360297,0.002049284,0.0036780792,0.008745066,0.0012416235,0.0037638773,0.16565289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010744195,0.0007312601,0.00087943696,0.0019277995,0.001477319,0.0029826062,0.0024618614,0.006900393,0.0659564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026781918,0.00013475252,0.0016829094,0.00033698592,0.000035920388,0.00033010516,0.001537951,0.00017342613,0.0017718285,0.1277184,0.6451763,0.22083355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001955313,0.000018230423,0.0020570413,0.00008998636,0.000004119665,0.00009633249,0.00014833214,0.00009334266,0.00036377026,0.0010476459,0.9960498,0.000011927811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06349823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03412907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16565289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006110099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006567649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5541641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921738486","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3260911","title":"Defining Corporate Law Oppression","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02484755818108262,"score_gpt":0.31289090747280107,"score_spread":0.28804334929171843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921738486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05983691,0.0017478621,0.022057304,0.022900805,0.00049091654,0.00013111116,0.00004494803,0.000050273873,0.8927399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647766,0.0004881559,0.0024461017,0.0038549586,0.0002563083,0.00016132083,0.000025757454,0.000044704477,0.02794608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866599,0.005059417,0.0005799225,0.001547503,0.0028476077,0.0033056338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99167633,0.0039073187,0.0008050361,0.0013232579,0.001532019,0.0007560181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008247124,0.00069228205,0.0010610546,0.005006563,0.013921054,0.020753562,0.0022340647,0.0080627045,0.008275186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01372172,0.000538619,0.0007250361,0.0024040786,0.085649535,0.013844052,0.015962327,0.011483873,0.00096331467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014347464,0.000006072686,0.00007287881,0.0000041820554,9.456083e-7,0.000031887925,0.001410744,0.000021170687,0.00003237526,0.9971438,0.0003857773,0.0008887291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006168016,0.00001320098,0.00035403256,0.000101258156,0.000007458846,0.000088291396,0.0053838072,0.00019083767,0.00028394625,0.96824896,0.025310516,0.000011564413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00479615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048920587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020753562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00729927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008171356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052960217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921844405","doi":"","title":"THE RECEPTION OF EQUITY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (1875-2000)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Equity (law); Tort; Political science; Conscience; Good faith; Duty; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.06841189570124676,"score_gpt":0.35082082447772717,"score_spread":0.2824089287764804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921844405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103292,0.057680145,0.0018595682,0.16998443,0.0027613523,0.000108153385,0.0017122856,0.00009004998,0.662512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82363874,0.01208915,0.0012384276,0.0341425,0.00083225063,0.00003718315,0.00028179682,0.00005187346,0.12768818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932405,0.0004430962,0.00010831877,0.000581463,0.0036121907,0.0020145483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403703,0.0012045081,0.00025504438,0.00012811576,0.0035076395,0.0008676864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003921877,0.0003033902,0.00036012303,0.003838308,0.018741045,0.011116801,0.0015575011,0.005730758,0.004390316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0134090455,0.00068667385,0.00031915703,0.0052098744,0.011206913,0.0019290356,0.002445311,0.0065816296,0.00025698415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030650222,0.000016028866,0.0028079564,0.000090153386,0.000021510732,0.00039065766,0.009235682,0.0005025272,0.00027558065,0.81351334,0.14396124,0.02915477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018854116,0.000013640726,0.022023818,0.00037982242,0.000029825189,0.00009521877,0.002887563,0.00037527873,0.0005051788,0.03173925,0.9418362,0.000095432224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9928402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21599635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21599635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18132861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9093331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921854331","doi":"10.11575/prism/33939","title":"The Law of Embellished Credentials","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Chemistry; Political science","score_opus":0.018811043433745303,"score_gpt":0.25203225956816605,"score_spread":0.23322121613442076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921854331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043146275,0.0018056822,0.0056402013,0.04953542,0.0006200484,0.000062399195,0.0001452723,0.000087268134,0.89895743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89136106,0.00065691967,0.0010800845,0.016218845,0.0004086663,0.00006665691,0.000035038436,0.00004055071,0.09013223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98838973,0.0016796582,0.00039505505,0.0012565441,0.0051315743,0.0031474466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147147,0.00349181,0.0006372721,0.0010104013,0.002364409,0.0010245398],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073597576,0.0005118613,0.0006378672,0.001257401,0.011803328,0.009738219,0.0018200792,0.011056519,0.006426078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024667362,0.0006260888,0.0004930783,0.0012177073,0.031154983,0.0035481013,0.006019369,0.012023324,0.0011821988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009685872,0.000006524634,0.00049454207,0.000013444463,0.0000034287448,0.00022592401,0.0008159656,0.00013051608,0.0000930616,0.98753524,0.007520441,0.003151401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008006032,0.000058878442,0.0055664405,0.00047708303,0.000040937553,0.0006083737,0.0018906323,0.001879506,0.0007932695,0.6933054,0.29515374,0.00014576544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2752508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2788585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98894346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015772905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018960636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5472973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922045478","doi":"10.3968/10951","title":"Research on the Contract for the Benefit of Third Parties","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Severability; Frustration of purpose; Legitimacy; Social contract; Legislature; Contract management; Exclusion clause; Law and economics; Third person; Business; Institution; Privity of contract; Law; Economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.11674591324143908,"score_gpt":0.4051746022599651,"score_spread":0.28842868901852603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922045478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034360755,0.025018636,0.08206574,0.04771372,0.0008746543,0.00020253395,0.00012243955,0.000044975255,0.8095965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91083837,0.0253736,0.023733526,0.0044722147,0.00076111325,0.00022052303,0.00013474956,0.00005901691,0.03440699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855216,0.006736458,0.00070587575,0.0016571258,0.0042286883,0.0011503435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766564,0.016631173,0.0016611493,0.001889406,0.0027086,0.00045338797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016409712,0.0004242221,0.0007118277,0.0029417244,0.0055177426,0.008478045,0.0015044335,0.0052344026,0.0060112323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02341279,0.00045260464,0.0010676276,0.004978085,0.024430135,0.015402394,0.0030000356,0.006360246,0.0007970041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010383019,0.0000019536344,0.00006557681,0.000015531434,9.729705e-7,0.000016537793,0.00038978196,0.000054931854,0.000012816299,0.99789906,0.00023270094,0.0013091121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006999951,0.000012984512,0.0006189725,0.00036306182,0.000014315406,0.00012475984,0.0010959185,0.0011180867,0.00020448156,0.9255535,0.07087035,0.00001652991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018050868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008312786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018050868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013737779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0159309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09967506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922274671","doi":"","title":"SOME RECENT DECISIONS ON THE ELEMENTOF UNLAWFULNESS IN INTENTIONAL TORTS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Element (criminal law); Appeal; Tort; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Contributory negligence; Res ipsa loquitur; Liability; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07926216876163567,"score_gpt":0.33636609424239433,"score_spread":0.25710392548075867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922274671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0087523265,0.10048346,0.0055708135,0.33253196,0.005166267,0.00012985089,0.0005148295,0.000078260935,0.54677224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33536178,0.110116504,0.011354923,0.28120813,0.011765256,0.00026598506,0.0005051656,0.00018166304,0.24924058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802244,0.0027694951,0.0013269922,0.0018643647,0.011467351,0.0023475054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98739946,0.004310515,0.0005574604,0.00062546285,0.0065733306,0.00053379417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015098127,0.0006329013,0.00063034194,0.0039514154,0.01234901,0.0096999025,0.0038722851,0.011286824,0.0042208154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018604424,0.0008943127,0.0009866882,0.003931794,0.020644378,0.0046438402,0.0022595536,0.012642276,0.00067160034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004770424,0.000008651791,0.00019429188,0.000091312,0.0000049227365,0.00009362881,0.0014245143,0.000099626865,0.00016087374,0.9432925,0.0456119,0.009012907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009888129,0.000013123025,0.0021849214,0.0004661183,0.000023501345,0.00009557631,0.0005901685,0.00014994034,0.0002882452,0.10522842,0.89088887,0.00006121961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74921197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83768284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25078803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059857238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038344454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50452995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923462742","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5691","title":"Rule 2.1 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure: Responding to Vexatious Litigation While Advancing Access to Justice?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Rule of law; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Law; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Political science; Resolution (logic); Procedural justice; American rule; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; History; Politics","score_opus":0.045308506931187854,"score_gpt":0.35854048593889065,"score_spread":0.3132319790077028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923462742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10998162,0.010714183,0.011168947,0.34029874,0.0049411706,0.00030427086,0.00050131656,0.00024080263,0.5218489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7223726,0.0060918857,0.008781821,0.09227873,0.0014714594,0.0001384293,0.000248616,0.00014161343,0.1684749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97958267,0.0018047004,0.0010102745,0.0018000328,0.011191126,0.0046112603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868624,0.0043411735,0.0015516352,0.0010455006,0.0047331434,0.0014660993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009449585,0.0002925213,0.0003474021,0.00073456165,0.008796433,0.009475852,0.002546517,0.007693543,0.0027426928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029200235,0.0005567112,0.0005209034,0.0010745202,0.01149133,0.0034159443,0.0020784885,0.0076644314,0.0006986244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079183075,0.000037152167,0.010475029,0.00024894412,0.00003556201,0.0013985898,0.0143260965,0.00084411696,0.0021360805,0.7217373,0.19131589,0.057365913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041091076,0.0000715762,0.020521307,0.0004983969,0.00004806609,0.0005195833,0.0073490636,0.0009981747,0.0015959346,0.046675265,0.9214756,0.00020593834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8822153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11778468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05034415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11231711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36527413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923491351","doi":"10.4324/9780429259586-12","title":"No Expropriation Without Full Compensation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Economics; Psychology; Market economy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03530270776180092,"score_gpt":0.2952961296678731,"score_spread":0.2599934219060722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923491351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017298125,0.0012188946,0.0011925078,0.0053873607,0.00080647034,0.000040474504,0.000086309294,0.000053634634,0.9894846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038059205,0.00071040995,0.0005133448,0.0049236007,0.00035589925,0.0000590889,0.00008434843,0.00006600158,0.95522815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958611,0.00065918476,0.0001849007,0.00076944,0.0018161954,0.0007090327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987931,0.00027715554,0.00006971714,0.00036080772,0.00041359826,0.00008553735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025694892,0.00065126794,0.00046875034,0.0008512257,0.004509876,0.0052805976,0.0016285976,0.004868803,0.051569793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051233107,0.0005386242,0.0005484575,0.00053154206,0.007497367,0.0063118576,0.004525333,0.006484321,0.01933932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000116677165,0.000023079112,0.00013407737,0.000030682466,0.0000037064847,0.00012813606,0.00071859796,0.000089096146,0.00012542782,0.8784059,0.10366859,0.01666101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008030243,0.000017470004,0.0002404288,0.00010780117,0.0000039582055,0.00019594652,0.00027204686,0.000120908444,0.00022189002,0.070851274,0.92794585,0.000014558531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012219213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02189515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051569793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004071089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005943244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17251813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W292880592","doi":"","title":"Antipodean Alignment: Impact of the Proposed Australian Consumer Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer protection; Corporation; Commission; Law; Population; Competition (biology); Legislation; Common law; Legislature; Economics; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02131163582588744,"score_gpt":0.3287517080437196,"score_spread":0.30744007221783215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W292880592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11549526,0.0019132379,0.0020780254,0.16631068,0.0019121269,0.00022839766,0.000089190115,0.000065039465,0.7119081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67270327,0.0023061112,0.0025953215,0.12323443,0.0008411942,0.00021269318,0.000093487004,0.00006652719,0.197947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840225,0.0043095113,0.0003924582,0.001087672,0.007908935,0.0022788453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912213,0.0033596822,0.00085789297,0.0005264795,0.0026857457,0.0013489447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010001694,0.00025258234,0.00029990813,0.0012940894,0.009860689,0.010954838,0.0020917172,0.008981073,0.012004137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024278458,0.00051693607,0.0007057825,0.0014544659,0.007900097,0.0052733887,0.007803958,0.012424921,0.0013320937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005519911,0.00028238358,0.0065156333,0.00013238094,0.000012740648,0.0010196156,0.014202626,0.00032439706,0.00052300264,0.8688067,0.05793075,0.050194453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004339985,0.0002955031,0.03454034,0.000434296,0.000044759152,0.0005223997,0.015304544,0.0025037432,0.0009855366,0.09339574,0.85183597,0.00009383554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085925676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12874998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085925676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0142196715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027730871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17085105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293453096","doi":"","title":"Canadian Preference Law Reform","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Legislation; Statutory law; Preference; Discretion; Political science; Law reform; Insolvency; Nothing; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.04087800652717334,"score_gpt":0.3298105964386153,"score_spread":0.288932589911442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293453096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074080974,0.005985796,0.0027172442,0.06211134,0.0012322115,0.00019881348,0.0019786104,0.00019954442,0.9181684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3072371,0.010765257,0.006701036,0.04374495,0.00076828845,0.00025808517,0.00159996,0.00019211782,0.62873316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99117893,0.00082072103,0.00027501697,0.001096351,0.004595092,0.0020339335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270964,0.0006515307,0.00014601042,0.0004916323,0.0051699704,0.0008311847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040495675,0.00061252894,0.00046724227,0.0038058497,0.015877368,0.0070505836,0.003487679,0.004430634,0.043021534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011951826,0.000495221,0.000649135,0.0056978487,0.008719319,0.0030939144,0.0028323855,0.0055115134,0.0029765605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011260817,0.000012453443,0.0003870537,0.00008727229,0.0000057954107,0.0000965214,0.00087843096,0.00040866752,0.000088308516,0.8340051,0.14383245,0.020186612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013753978,0.000008316941,0.0013305526,0.00016018709,0.000013704551,0.000060586914,0.0005116794,0.00051169796,0.00016867074,0.035629045,0.9615586,0.0000331527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98169804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98442644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16634864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16634864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20808168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9669174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935926385","doi":"","title":"Transfer by Contract at Common Law and in Equity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"German; Law and economics; Equity (law); Contract theory; Property rights; Entitlement (fair division); Common law; Freedom of contract; Law; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); German model; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011678133545315768,"score_gpt":0.30709850209433237,"score_spread":0.2954203685490166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935926385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04065923,0.0069053723,0.120865166,0.04360591,0.0004958453,0.00017382452,0.00011110752,0.00009779988,0.78708565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93482697,0.0019567006,0.010524271,0.004223425,0.0007165136,0.0002995748,0.000042700744,0.00006537929,0.04734438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921944,0.0036377697,0.00021487389,0.0010716046,0.001673268,0.001207939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634886,0.002044295,0.00033571044,0.00067019166,0.00035567518,0.0002452534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008031698,0.00058890873,0.0007285911,0.0014446939,0.0056341616,0.00907969,0.0014843724,0.0068904273,0.007542178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009772426,0.00034114037,0.0008860248,0.0017378648,0.04088042,0.012500189,0.0051435744,0.006077044,0.00073670334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.550747e-7,0.0000015747431,0.000014972955,0.0000017089828,6.065753e-7,0.000008763424,0.00010933569,0.000058373178,0.000005371631,0.9993436,0.00012403495,0.00033072743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058497367,0.0000051104225,0.00004576222,0.000019681765,0.000001914262,0.000018126368,0.000094800365,0.000335963,0.000035619098,0.9913312,0.008103054,0.000003016875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012541301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004437204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012541301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011266572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069298223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08174509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938806466","doi":"10.7202/1058572ar","title":"La fiducie de protection d’actifs : un mirage ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011390730844387013,"score_gpt":0.2489675395000546,"score_spread":0.23757680865566758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938806466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07328488,0.02436386,0.017704044,0.31283188,0.002962155,0.000090446745,0.00059785444,0.00017249731,0.5679924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74890053,0.0056596915,0.005719281,0.031425416,0.0005115397,0.00012052735,0.00019504932,0.00012031718,0.2073476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397933,0.0013754901,0.00015251836,0.0011067007,0.001768083,0.0016178781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946542,0.0012154952,0.00036450513,0.0007069085,0.002232588,0.0008263271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00550134,0.00070801197,0.0008129161,0.0016869996,0.011060523,0.008274873,0.0022500374,0.005407395,0.012197855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008918326,0.0005195995,0.00060876424,0.0012563361,0.024763634,0.005216257,0.0031015996,0.008493262,0.001380026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033050434,0.000015868694,0.0019049364,0.00007090198,0.000019711126,0.0001583863,0.0077610444,0.00014014717,0.00027678176,0.9363296,0.027642217,0.025647305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003776494,0.0000585181,0.01432269,0.0009567734,0.000049032435,0.00028994583,0.010111755,0.0006329274,0.00089358765,0.13742167,0.8351031,0.00012221707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76776254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79655313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76776254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031427734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037401836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4672103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939098456","doi":"","title":"TOWARDS A COSTS JURISPRUDENCE IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Commonwealth; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.09088388749194683,"score_gpt":0.35427415455647293,"score_spread":0.2633902670645261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939098456","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012658566,0.010525664,0.08885077,0.47376847,0.002133876,0.00021707013,0.0001019913,0.00011713831,0.4116265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75745535,0.0073467754,0.05311541,0.122839555,0.006494556,0.00051649695,0.00010463243,0.00016967414,0.051957604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9392804,0.01738219,0.0020806256,0.0042698933,0.031928103,0.005058807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9543827,0.027081557,0.0024942183,0.002984036,0.011084797,0.0019725868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037216894,0.0007533069,0.0011355733,0.0052002994,0.012964912,0.024964511,0.0057182456,0.02657265,0.0034189294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053241868,0.0010664724,0.0014872277,0.0029316759,0.07306968,0.018801136,0.008200625,0.032421872,0.00076591206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.3774927e-7,0.000004548663,0.000032007272,0.0000070809683,0.0000010911483,0.0000122404645,0.00016413556,0.00011214987,0.0000140294005,0.99731916,0.00141463,0.0009180328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014472184,0.000009204978,0.00023038313,0.00014100186,0.000007590519,0.00002931491,0.0005599955,0.00061092945,0.0001163195,0.946539,0.051718675,0.00002301577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16543196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16361842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.834568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04156042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06855542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32893813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941406437","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v8n1p85","title":"Modernising English Land Law - Part 2","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Land law; English law; Political science; Geography; Land tenure; Archaeology","score_opus":0.12422715167170083,"score_gpt":0.45474775971785747,"score_spread":0.3305206080461566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941406437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026875766,0.025850289,0.013329459,0.042521663,0.0022651018,0.0002137528,0.00033867743,0.00014898916,0.8884562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47444662,0.024775663,0.018395001,0.020234676,0.0031874443,0.00047115295,0.0005954841,0.00034586724,0.45754808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977204,0.00063582556,0.00013019453,0.00032446653,0.0008057643,0.00038317314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988061,0.00047915577,0.000104878505,0.00020752996,0.00033127665,0.00007104987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028942905,0.0005196988,0.00053901423,0.0016556218,0.0029145996,0.0058411793,0.0009388121,0.0031328457,0.016114537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004050785,0.00044020868,0.0004751015,0.0012816875,0.0063285558,0.005691482,0.0034924801,0.004712365,0.0024336942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009882055,0.00006405602,0.0005537769,0.00019222131,0.0000081107055,0.00013727459,0.004844406,0.00028190753,0.0005782114,0.9325984,0.026161714,0.034570098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001296147,0.000043768163,0.0040017073,0.0004749612,0.000012488816,0.00020361648,0.002273009,0.00024791152,0.001013917,0.19193624,0.79975295,0.000026421356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011452169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015147883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016114537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050184876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005274942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053908467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942877045","doi":"10.7202/1057117ar","title":"La création de l’hypothèque légale immobilière","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012974502354023238,"score_gpt":0.2627065553476332,"score_spread":0.24973205299360998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942877045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042057615,0.0043861903,0.08704829,0.04127017,0.0010025293,0.00026539995,0.0006598951,0.00015356671,0.8231563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82753706,0.0035413792,0.031797685,0.0039401734,0.00040948333,0.0003416205,0.00036493962,0.000115234485,0.13195251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994194,0.001596808,0.00021123736,0.0010679639,0.0021204199,0.0008096243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99071246,0.0038024436,0.00085897,0.001464726,0.0027577586,0.00040358753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065203365,0.00068378844,0.000664365,0.0029299187,0.006350339,0.007078912,0.0024994607,0.003078128,0.022895815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011319463,0.00050467905,0.0011925066,0.001640711,0.031075839,0.0065339017,0.0047695218,0.004166838,0.0023671316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004868243,0.00000569844,0.0007132924,0.00003397572,0.000006125077,0.000060712213,0.0013156794,0.00016694627,0.000079348,0.9922684,0.0016712485,0.0036738252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003810183,0.000043124575,0.008040809,0.0006945088,0.000051097446,0.0005716547,0.005299565,0.0027372595,0.0009345272,0.58882517,0.3926921,0.00007207641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19901854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20467725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19901854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015595165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020163909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39572024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943068920","doi":"10.7202/1057478ar","title":"The Nature and Diversity of Personal Property Security Systems in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legislation; Personal property; Unitary state; Commensurability (mathematics); Property (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Homogeneous; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008797914751421188,"score_gpt":0.2180628367415985,"score_spread":0.2092649219901773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943068920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84181136,0.0021707264,0.00333246,0.0056439186,0.00002818784,0.00016777919,0.0013576669,0.0001236737,0.1453642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99413055,0.00053158175,0.0010319033,0.00017696602,0.0000025721552,0.000013478671,0.00023511537,0.0000118762055,0.0038659496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951662,0.0003073828,0.00014017102,0.00055617676,0.0021444182,0.0016856003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535996,0.00065699447,0.0005080495,0.00025255873,0.002175558,0.0010468918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014288981,0.00021365499,0.0004175601,0.005584791,0.013174981,0.0073428475,0.0016494298,0.00059747003,0.0030066965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067574535,0.00040346343,0.00041998323,0.008011296,0.010136051,0.0012725161,0.0028370046,0.0011386599,0.00013777624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021223357,0.00008180028,0.22229162,0.0002777704,0.00019676208,0.001090814,0.08019934,0.005159173,0.0035250126,0.5310749,0.013216208,0.14267448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050307863,0.00007618642,0.70799345,0.00033305105,0.00014504956,0.0005856669,0.07080359,0.00851622,0.001528138,0.042649176,0.16705944,0.0002597142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99579096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99717796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13860506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13860506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099303775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943499758","doi":"10.7202/1058511ar","title":"L’injonction, voie d’exécution forcée des obligations de faire","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.017843811206221968,"score_gpt":0.2690875239258403,"score_spread":0.2512437127196183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943499758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039015263,0.012494957,0.018690575,0.05937537,0.0015141862,0.00010848824,0.0003195277,0.00013828208,0.8683433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5606366,0.005475611,0.0054957946,0.011236065,0.00033668082,0.00010874846,0.00012653576,0.0001599989,0.41642395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943507,0.0015476192,0.00016561897,0.0008465354,0.0021581782,0.00093141984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649304,0.0011246837,0.00020246998,0.00040386067,0.0014965244,0.00027949197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003349244,0.00054476573,0.0003967548,0.0012659964,0.010688553,0.007889204,0.0015126113,0.0047767386,0.011623956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055050463,0.00040869968,0.00052402663,0.0012060675,0.026438933,0.003217345,0.0027089308,0.0075698546,0.0012039061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009092731,0.000008661504,0.0004891991,0.00004582932,0.0000056151707,0.00010361348,0.008573304,0.00020274137,0.00023916607,0.9696084,0.011537489,0.009176906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012532102,0.000029945344,0.004513615,0.00050894276,0.000019794214,0.00020369381,0.0062757614,0.00056053826,0.00086816365,0.09115678,0.89577484,0.000075435666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78845245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8081094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78845245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04504693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050361834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42558676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943640747","doi":"10.7202/1058325ar","title":"Aspects conceptuels et juridiques du « droit de propriété »","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0164109177443871,"score_gpt":0.27646370230823947,"score_spread":0.2600527845638524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943640747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04827999,0.032341704,0.049924035,0.030050818,0.0013114351,0.000073956486,0.00032767843,0.0001018068,0.83758867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8609322,0.021892074,0.01570396,0.004001404,0.001729708,0.0002660703,0.00027226962,0.00015691864,0.09504538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922809,0.003673714,0.0003584429,0.0009225016,0.0021225573,0.00064190396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482405,0.0026890808,0.00073549745,0.00049943046,0.0009168755,0.0003350548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060122013,0.00074476853,0.0004879955,0.0044704233,0.006662273,0.016577832,0.0013537073,0.002727036,0.006997262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007450932,0.0005284895,0.0007012429,0.0058057215,0.03000375,0.0127090225,0.0040193656,0.008626054,0.0011083849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043479686,0.0000025261252,0.00015307004,0.000025077305,0.000001847957,0.000014573909,0.004249327,0.000049645347,0.000045890538,0.9924551,0.0006006606,0.0023979053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015783826,0.000029164681,0.0036499496,0.0005309782,0.000018537332,0.00031200564,0.011869721,0.0006076456,0.0004656875,0.52509254,0.45734566,0.00006233617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019857587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016387053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019857587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012172727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072423806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08831972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944911387","doi":"","title":"Discoverability Principles and the Law's Mistakes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011791868784339903,"score_gpt":0.268150991119724,"score_spread":0.2563591223353841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944911387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124589235,0.008884054,0.31096992,0.18721215,0.0014384632,0.00020210893,0.00027668916,0.0003507651,0.3660766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527136,0.0018600118,0.018512463,0.0072552683,0.0007051098,0.00017050459,0.000055161967,0.00008808083,0.018639803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766492,0.006882091,0.002025441,0.0026292421,0.010258354,0.0015556706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614293,0.02791382,0.002859463,0.0045738122,0.002708141,0.0005154438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021338576,0.00043604002,0.00089142827,0.003224073,0.004869328,0.007917686,0.0025422366,0.006819116,0.0021106107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036998175,0.00064180436,0.0010514816,0.0013645953,0.06795085,0.017558234,0.007996557,0.010314972,0.000498698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031175502,0.0000031991478,0.000104463805,0.000011517146,0.0000017908459,0.000060558956,0.0016598948,0.0001272822,0.00004429747,0.99572146,0.00049954094,0.0017628496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011037024,0.000009635858,0.00018461137,0.00006294584,0.0000044116127,0.00010748064,0.0006003811,0.0003764275,0.00019254225,0.98002726,0.018408075,0.000015182653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057294914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034795431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021338576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005594552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065337224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11285055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945248121","doi":"","title":"THE SHORT LIFE AND LONG AFTER LIFE OF CHARITABLE IMMUNITY IN THE COMMON LAW","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Tort; Law; Common law; Sovereign immunity; Argument (complex analysis); Unconscionability; Political science; Liability; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.044480520706335964,"score_gpt":0.31304104353315926,"score_spread":0.2685605228268233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945248121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042942636,0.18115634,0.010809198,0.3739226,0.0036642805,0.000034877423,0.0000912052,0.0000623522,0.38731655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8739021,0.03702059,0.002109533,0.03649552,0.002128383,0.00003904103,0.00003826981,0.000036106532,0.048230574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307984,0.0020051247,0.00018187657,0.00059200695,0.003014041,0.001127148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943638,0.002700151,0.00052238395,0.0003026895,0.0013382583,0.00077265874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004636808,0.0002060245,0.0003986953,0.0016739044,0.008749027,0.008137276,0.00095220894,0.0048744786,0.0023490028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010659307,0.00025156164,0.00024468917,0.0018104359,0.05419417,0.0064403294,0.0029739677,0.0069586895,0.00032385674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003820099,0.0000047146655,0.00020768036,0.000036206882,0.000002145327,0.00005687892,0.0017444731,0.000054163847,0.000048140613,0.9816042,0.007203151,0.009034452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006884025,0.000026887557,0.0028593556,0.00060207065,0.00001175111,0.00015516298,0.0044788592,0.00015749164,0.00012702969,0.5396138,0.45192462,0.000036088808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22608706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29380608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7739129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024378559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031175371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44954216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946065876","doi":"","title":"Assessing Tort Damages in the Conflict of Laws: Loci, Fori, Illogical","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Tort; Law; Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Choice of law; Conflict of laws; Common law; Delict; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Private law; Liability; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.1375191178248268,"score_gpt":0.39347463436927543,"score_spread":0.25595551654444865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946065876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07664818,0.27740765,0.091001526,0.21035427,0.0022622687,0.00039922315,0.00061469624,0.000093552626,0.34121865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8746714,0.06388841,0.032836538,0.0095271235,0.0014002142,0.0001313489,0.0001449652,0.000060789444,0.017339189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804174,0.005250068,0.0010558607,0.001185226,0.010902139,0.0011893798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98322195,0.007473682,0.0021991117,0.0006452189,0.0059868908,0.00047306262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018772138,0.00093974825,0.0013988428,0.016610904,0.0074459687,0.015753087,0.002769286,0.0038607933,0.003898204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03275431,0.0005578689,0.0009984091,0.00890796,0.029441034,0.009955943,0.005481442,0.004723307,0.00026580266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014419197,0.000031875123,0.0071972176,0.00046137074,0.000079209225,0.00023764615,0.002712352,0.0027789585,0.00018957339,0.9017392,0.008729135,0.075829014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010622759,0.00003551742,0.016594898,0.0028815656,0.000093549446,0.00034265986,0.009108398,0.004633284,0.00040559983,0.8609505,0.104843855,0.00009956577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.392579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5767368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.392579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03444795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0381928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78058785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946219693","doi":"","title":"Die fiducie von Quebec und der trust : ein Vergleich mit verschiedenen Modellen fiduziarischer Rechtsfiguren im civil law, by Rainer Becker : book review","year":2008,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03775990150064473,"score_gpt":0.3137216502076842,"score_spread":0.2759617487070395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946219693","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019861758,0.53168035,0.0036661227,0.0486392,0.00107329,0.000060466857,0.000855406,0.00005377813,0.39410967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65137714,0.27541974,0.0022631034,0.004668513,0.00059109257,0.00009969399,0.00042926607,0.00006698841,0.06508443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981353,0.0005413893,0.00003542125,0.00012236417,0.0009153212,0.00025011835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974081,0.0011831353,0.0001773748,0.00007848509,0.0010419459,0.00011100593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023394956,0.00044723655,0.00059424347,0.0033691432,0.0036779095,0.0067948694,0.0014840213,0.0022700788,0.009783553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071117324,0.0002918591,0.00032428218,0.0076197465,0.0069811814,0.0033265927,0.000992389,0.0015290915,0.00049778254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033859127,0.000015832298,0.0017585111,0.00050190405,0.000059479844,0.000103127466,0.0021335327,0.0029806367,0.0000603747,0.8310134,0.09547946,0.065859914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039575945,0.00005401699,0.023934312,0.0030050569,0.00014552841,0.00023308594,0.0061920728,0.004617616,0.00018554048,0.26001275,0.70148283,0.00009771572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90761715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93684506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09238285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05652297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039780438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41010475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946281054","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198793731.003.0002","title":"2 The Origins of the Supreme Court","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dominion; Political science; Irish; Certiorari; Constitution; Legislation; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; State (computer science); Philosophy","score_opus":0.030136886832216388,"score_gpt":0.24172212380336108,"score_spread":0.2115852369711447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946281054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040837927,0.009143519,0.0020124551,0.013907623,0.0003806885,0.0000150924325,0.000049182487,0.000020600837,0.97038704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69873357,0.009696782,0.0026356713,0.009468666,0.0011641161,0.00012958722,0.00011724371,0.000110327914,0.27794406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611473,0.0014914206,0.00007673944,0.0005942348,0.0010057936,0.0007170985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985209,0.0007497613,0.00006705285,0.00011952323,0.0003813482,0.0001614368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022639956,0.00038904973,0.00035655926,0.0018583453,0.007621549,0.012827462,0.0012393845,0.0035053885,0.007157948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004822265,0.0004095538,0.00030222101,0.0019084886,0.03760173,0.005150961,0.0032569666,0.008196426,0.0013478333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8008785e-7,0.0000014385191,0.000027605714,0.000003742182,2.8953033e-7,0.000010766128,0.0006400849,0.00003005553,0.000005116103,0.9951845,0.002697217,0.0013985413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005777504,0.000007935368,0.00037771926,0.00019720968,0.0000022908846,0.000036756654,0.0015397269,0.0002499276,0.00007570786,0.55756235,0.43993193,0.0000127156545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10217297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12201678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10217297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034097034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015321405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24739242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946420703","doi":"10.7202/1067518ar","title":"Corporate Law Federalism in Historical Context: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Federalism; Corporate governance; Regulatory competition; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legislature; State (computer science); Federal law; Competition (biology); Consolidation (business); Political economy; Law; Economics; Legislation; Accounting; Politics; History","score_opus":0.07637408542294566,"score_gpt":0.2640928476731368,"score_spread":0.18771876225019113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946420703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39456782,0.04089215,0.0009913387,0.059958942,0.000994887,0.000053890795,0.0015952736,0.00005883466,0.5008868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753983,0.012105893,0.00034005215,0.0031147276,0.00011692984,0.00001283729,0.00032191226,0.000030484158,0.0085587725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965132,0.00035132124,0.000058613048,0.00028663754,0.0011974183,0.0015929261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957222,0.0008133882,0.0003629881,0.000076800476,0.002214777,0.0008097699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016512249,0.00024666826,0.00030867365,0.0061960365,0.026614718,0.009714154,0.001013755,0.0015739369,0.00375823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005765924,0.00026269726,0.00025217157,0.011803961,0.012131303,0.0027822794,0.0027245318,0.003511802,0.00016427315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009475775,0.00005129397,0.027028374,0.00024651038,0.000051151528,0.0011903913,0.15858561,0.00064452604,0.00045661264,0.70436335,0.04936556,0.057921883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011546206,0.000031600437,0.09521678,0.00077815616,0.00006448469,0.0005008496,0.14684726,0.00038093148,0.0004273495,0.009632283,0.7459832,0.00012551153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19276525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19276525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13541582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93627787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946860006","doi":"10.7202/1059559ar","title":"P.G.Q. et la Régie du logement c. Grondin et al. : marche arrière justifiée sur un chemin parsemé d’embûches","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02248827586646343,"score_gpt":0.28460990551247206,"score_spread":0.2621216296460086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946860006","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015948828,0.030843318,0.0045350804,0.53146017,0.0028083876,0.00005896043,0.00034620037,0.00007715939,0.4139219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4885008,0.01942827,0.004638186,0.15052061,0.002311201,0.00020032901,0.00015893856,0.0003993079,0.33384234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684274,0.00096675777,0.00010629301,0.00061521697,0.0009199881,0.0005490441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969374,0.0020876683,0.00015891861,0.00014347545,0.000544248,0.00012826148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029301709,0.00047783268,0.00053184666,0.00092976494,0.010548721,0.0104012685,0.0016716134,0.01142087,0.0141183715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009937705,0.00045619824,0.0005796855,0.0017944921,0.01696926,0.0067267222,0.0031322557,0.012444067,0.0017747198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002394058,0.000006534849,0.0004029632,0.000055486173,0.0000058441688,0.00012277225,0.009138172,0.00009482301,0.00007174579,0.9081316,0.073680855,0.0082653435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028277685,0.000015120474,0.0026287087,0.00042192516,0.000018976703,0.00012458033,0.010313865,0.00026755175,0.00039399997,0.1840705,0.80167395,0.000042572432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29302245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39920804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29302245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014923052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016335675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58263373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947044200","doi":"10.7202/1059311ar","title":"Jurisdiction, Illegality and Fault: An Unholy Trinity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Ultra vires; Liability; Duty; Economic Justice; Private law; Political science; Common law; Delict; Law and economics; Public law; Business; Sociology; Doctrine","score_opus":0.01799961092328624,"score_gpt":0.2891396236564316,"score_spread":0.27114001273314536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947044200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026281653,0.09834581,0.057422463,0.49655032,0.009878069,0.000063198524,0.0002445071,0.0002963992,0.3109176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78501886,0.032048333,0.01604256,0.066945605,0.0145872785,0.00023397894,0.00015389323,0.00045264102,0.08451684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943283,0.0024061457,0.00023102951,0.000759612,0.0017150737,0.00055981125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325174,0.0043211817,0.000309277,0.0009910957,0.0006984307,0.0004282746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004967274,0.00070481794,0.0011414672,0.0022000389,0.008538298,0.014065128,0.0017488061,0.007255503,0.0069023115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01272327,0.00058783847,0.00055492483,0.001236531,0.07448573,0.031536613,0.010566973,0.014531611,0.0011649022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001041964,0.000005709938,0.000094782685,0.000023227476,0.0000023331897,0.000052281765,0.0016607023,0.00005751619,0.000034663077,0.9864108,0.0063016172,0.005345918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009535052,0.000012260167,0.00012765719,0.00016309193,0.0000039726565,0.00013525656,0.0016569524,0.00021148195,0.000048467853,0.8966983,0.100916706,0.000016377873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005241061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006016674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014065128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056686043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046906187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041128814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947154093","doi":"10.7202/1059553ar","title":"Mitigation of Damage in the Context of Remedies for Breach of Contract","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Breach of contract; Context (archaeology); Unjust enrichment; Work (physics); Law; Compensation (psychology); Delict; Damages; Business; Order (exchange); Common law; Action (physics); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Phase (matter); Political science; Restitution; Private law; Liability; Economics; Commercial law; Public law; Psychology; Engineering; Black letter law","score_opus":0.018117270394140343,"score_gpt":0.28895617541915164,"score_spread":0.2708389050250113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947154093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14428149,0.023748057,0.32220605,0.074175045,0.0017425235,0.0007275635,0.00015189721,0.0001924991,0.43277478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961181,0.0032731642,0.022552134,0.001062949,0.00068109616,0.00024124615,0.000021901611,0.000034945642,0.010951563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98570573,0.007683689,0.000502701,0.0014297629,0.0025488,0.0021292774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920935,0.004218377,0.0015965648,0.0007815066,0.0008168925,0.00049309124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008775405,0.00092641125,0.0011767627,0.002815602,0.005460005,0.0059262887,0.0027980409,0.009615404,0.0057503367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014363821,0.000467031,0.0013935952,0.0012253976,0.01928201,0.00736886,0.006060911,0.006531256,0.00034400733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020663205,0.00004252696,0.0002902736,0.00009994089,0.000022420822,0.0004999712,0.0009871633,0.0066696526,0.00046605433,0.9858759,0.0006598874,0.0043656426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036135218,0.00023017153,0.0017972704,0.00040620036,0.00006063844,0.00055178534,0.0028630246,0.016207352,0.00077254535,0.9405519,0.036437556,0.00008551937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004970464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00491566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009615404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075733415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077848337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054948688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947294571","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1370","title":"Assn. of Justice Counsel: The Section 7 Liberty Interest in the Context of Employment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Constitutional right; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.07428482307714,"score_gpt":0.34827542114241916,"score_spread":0.27399059806527915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947294571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055076998,0.00869935,0.0013112203,0.44414857,0.0061666192,0.0005126981,0.0020538222,0.00015073843,0.48188004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23664501,0.0027842422,0.0015505297,0.48619938,0.00194203,0.000357054,0.000349127,0.00009358982,0.270079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98924166,0.0009825523,0.00044764893,0.001537949,0.0028909103,0.0048993286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953837,0.0020705143,0.00026797553,0.00014361243,0.0013085123,0.000825629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040729726,0.00079807674,0.0012085331,0.00093075045,0.028342431,0.008987943,0.0033891988,0.038110334,0.012060096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012994742,0.0016195718,0.0008665674,0.0014057236,0.0064044124,0.0030566773,0.00270865,0.023636097,0.0026648373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010419616,0.00011673847,0.0057159625,0.000101144025,0.00004247491,0.0030086155,0.011022385,0.0003670534,0.0013783637,0.5232632,0.44457245,0.010307404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016317026,0.00012465061,0.014940354,0.0006529836,0.00011742339,0.0008763348,0.010276603,0.0012615419,0.001184762,0.04529593,0.9247961,0.00031012742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84058493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92059946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84058493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027217444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06738328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32070774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947343900","doi":"","title":"(You're) Having My Baby: Surrogacy Fees as a Cost of Future Care Award in Canadian Tort Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Damages; Law; Harm; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.019739883197349095,"score_gpt":0.33989398540305477,"score_spread":0.32015410220570567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947343900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020724092,0.119738184,0.0029435945,0.44060332,0.0037659525,0.00017480599,0.00027731023,0.00006308196,0.41170964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.570796,0.13400331,0.0048341705,0.20438336,0.002395208,0.00018826163,0.00022940573,0.000096036776,0.08307422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881861,0.0019137686,0.00033922552,0.00077029056,0.006865378,0.0019252573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98956525,0.005678474,0.00040819793,0.00027384696,0.0032671457,0.0008070758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010230436,0.00045144145,0.00050311326,0.0041805147,0.016221657,0.010064804,0.002536163,0.010476206,0.006013728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025576055,0.0005582067,0.00067833974,0.004934418,0.023980098,0.004155184,0.0027980423,0.010489126,0.00039464276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112761145,0.000019586532,0.0011481843,0.00014295259,0.000008293587,0.00029920504,0.0030611083,0.0002771359,0.00008792611,0.88227427,0.07802739,0.034642734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046722875,0.00004194359,0.011836873,0.002667282,0.00005875997,0.00041724145,0.005050127,0.0010233902,0.00020060534,0.08981692,0.8886593,0.00018082818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9588909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9775398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10531227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10531227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13573435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7640976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947526780","doi":"10.7202/1059353ar","title":"LE CONTRÔLE JUDICIAIRE DE L’APPLICATION DES PRINCIPES DE JUSTICE NATURELLE PAR LES ARBITRES DES GRIEFS QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01359492871908032,"score_gpt":0.2584146645603432,"score_spread":0.24481973584126285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947526780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042234216,0.006011119,0.019810034,0.10952391,0.0005595639,0.00017217374,0.00018778414,0.00006028341,0.82144094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8672021,0.0020814314,0.004877523,0.010375238,0.00020893996,0.00011661334,0.000043255706,0.00003401233,0.115060866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930956,0.002073324,0.0001747227,0.00078757183,0.0021508965,0.0017179429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929516,0.0023477843,0.00042762305,0.0006260486,0.0028398794,0.00080704095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077871094,0.000482067,0.00053859386,0.0013283165,0.0110123865,0.0096668415,0.0018098708,0.005530261,0.0067233844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009333223,0.00036263416,0.00054764573,0.0010175669,0.028172284,0.0022908824,0.002558307,0.006438322,0.0005769402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045437473,0.000007866479,0.0006626007,0.000023837112,0.0000088757515,0.00006474324,0.0027747639,0.0002605286,0.00017503128,0.9862851,0.006143133,0.0035890208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047111604,0.000047243386,0.011593762,0.0006515609,0.00004688423,0.00021002337,0.0065077506,0.0025870888,0.0010282219,0.53728443,0.4398949,0.00010092044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76165706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8338475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23834294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038826264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06313914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47949314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947699162","doi":"10.1017/s135232521900003x","title":"MULTIPLE REASONABLE BEHAVIORS CASES: THE PROBLEM OF CAUSAL UNDERDETERMINATION IN TORT LAW","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Causation; Tort; Plaintiff; Liability; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.016187626675876105,"score_gpt":0.3026653194304473,"score_spread":0.2864776927545712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947699162","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16338624,0.005871359,0.4265291,0.2587944,0.0010234159,0.00056670944,0.00020077938,0.00023779762,0.14339015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675303,0.0007667941,0.022999372,0.006069113,0.00074033876,0.00020307057,0.000023450208,0.000029163,0.0016382363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9007783,0.068345465,0.004287513,0.008151437,0.015271371,0.0031658094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6543835,0.3107458,0.013273636,0.012691809,0.007057692,0.0018476074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07385922,0.0007274772,0.0019361279,0.0048410315,0.0058028293,0.0075710113,0.0039213183,0.016954891,0.004732203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21708453,0.0011463403,0.0017173585,0.0025147542,0.041852057,0.015386638,0.007440892,0.017489536,0.0003206594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016184385,0.000023613515,0.0012425223,0.000033663928,0.000024898636,0.0009984713,0.0010977034,0.00075644796,0.0000434225,0.99063617,0.0010558297,0.004071091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032208663,0.000010419232,0.00027552617,0.000057321802,0.000017554066,0.0005425329,0.00033907415,0.0036781328,0.00013102846,0.9919001,0.0029986838,0.00001745802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031418246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002660199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07385922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005287866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044966354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39060956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947703422","doi":"10.7202/1066342ar","title":"The Private Law State","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Municipal law; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Commercial law; Tort; Civil law (Civil law); Liability","score_opus":0.018253781736423332,"score_gpt":0.29304985253850757,"score_spread":0.27479607080208424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947703422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013539182,0.0028746007,0.02546976,0.04609429,0.0007290288,0.00005070758,0.00020972615,0.00011618708,0.9109165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8449132,0.0027632138,0.0055146897,0.014121147,0.001093624,0.00014713006,0.00022869134,0.00013205191,0.13108627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958967,0.0012847392,0.00014992639,0.0012022243,0.0009122216,0.00055413845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705005,0.0010545371,0.000235407,0.0007833132,0.0005937038,0.00028287095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033711866,0.00035750517,0.00041754916,0.0010548045,0.00470585,0.011401413,0.0008439432,0.0035913647,0.015079049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066487077,0.00030757088,0.00045461764,0.00088596233,0.024849076,0.011691274,0.005091075,0.0053845136,0.0022274517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001317871,0.0000022782451,0.00006294665,0.000004078474,0.0000010833379,0.000006283973,0.0005672762,0.000022369677,0.000020567386,0.994752,0.0022925748,0.002267346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052276446,0.000007671568,0.00028590165,0.000079165206,0.000006540984,0.00004389456,0.0012220221,0.00023455001,0.00012144078,0.7489389,0.24904524,0.00000937836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007487271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051199966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015079049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00661174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007320963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050444424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947766905","doi":"10.7202/1059554ar","title":"Louisiana's Mixed Legal System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Association (psychology); Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.011379430425795463,"score_gpt":0.2516979804846845,"score_spread":0.24031855005888905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947766905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08505575,0.0039455,0.006247926,0.06902915,0.00036668906,0.00006331865,0.00073912967,0.0005560689,0.83399653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6414953,0.0014213201,0.0065260753,0.01745799,0.00019192572,0.00016097592,0.00031864384,0.000112292306,0.33231542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754936,0.00069230626,0.00012193472,0.0004211454,0.0007035899,0.00051168434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740547,0.0007177604,0.00018753213,0.00025212165,0.0011343787,0.00030272861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027682367,0.00024088574,0.0002891733,0.0015723791,0.012724397,0.010334179,0.0013681029,0.0025247545,0.013259307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004658379,0.0002992301,0.0003882787,0.0015782545,0.0045549953,0.0036508646,0.0053468356,0.0037862165,0.0016543454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001713797,0.000014353272,0.0012752466,0.000027902852,0.000009279011,0.00017736343,0.0024069024,0.00016723615,0.0001718018,0.9535231,0.024209285,0.018000556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018546321,0.000048672642,0.0031665205,0.0002374647,0.000037176167,0.00028144874,0.0027349137,0.00176302,0.00041646275,0.094923355,0.8963103,0.000062128354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30231696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36622384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30231696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020325996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018573439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6011146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947943243","doi":"10.7202/1059308ar","title":"Le texte législatif source de la responsabilité extra-contractuelle de l’État","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.00981145925541916,"score_gpt":0.26290248047828363,"score_spread":0.2530910212228645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947943243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008168527,0.0025054244,0.003939333,0.030884445,0.0022452665,0.00017416237,0.0030655824,0.00033121076,0.9486861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07443725,0.001119438,0.0015540858,0.010117452,0.00040583743,0.00018663866,0.0011238848,0.00027223545,0.9107832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948087,0.0005747484,0.00017876163,0.0007370997,0.0025877634,0.0011129311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957354,0.0008251562,0.00015629614,0.00035545044,0.002669341,0.00025829178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002580839,0.00060768315,0.0005704565,0.001778974,0.008233053,0.006700238,0.001570517,0.0039197747,0.057793442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062456555,0.00064259116,0.00064879423,0.001933905,0.0038302161,0.0020363687,0.0017824696,0.0057516783,0.011260132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039408547,0.000024577796,0.0011209494,0.00015916885,0.000017464205,0.00022602128,0.0044065225,0.00024377159,0.0009931142,0.59538466,0.3731867,0.024197526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008311171,0.000005759346,0.0018981202,0.000099386765,0.000008731522,0.00003263262,0.00041284465,0.00010343286,0.00035659486,0.0028945664,0.99415994,0.000019663845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7149967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7386598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7149967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028388567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040705893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5733635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947973764","doi":"10.7202/1058697ar","title":"L’arrêt Eve et le droit québécois","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016040382936182897,"score_gpt":0.26588435376096764,"score_spread":0.24984397082478474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947973764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037161067,0.0135330465,0.0024054367,0.076039664,0.00074542715,0.000037891634,0.00035403483,0.000040192594,0.86968327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6102307,0.00782586,0.0010140185,0.012978064,0.0003730633,0.000056692475,0.0001086429,0.000054433855,0.36735857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818254,0.00034830734,0.000040226805,0.00020706521,0.00055333384,0.0006685989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877506,0.00038920422,0.00008233236,0.00007832001,0.00049149845,0.000183527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011224652,0.00044310102,0.00039860787,0.0010627294,0.007998645,0.0055215983,0.0011722293,0.002949184,0.013185543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022951236,0.00019258929,0.0003153097,0.0013564812,0.010836481,0.001815529,0.0016577984,0.0040197284,0.00091128255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016109796,0.000009262889,0.0012863548,0.00005262057,0.000009181204,0.00018031667,0.009208186,0.00017209875,0.00013742138,0.9416001,0.034926504,0.012401881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011584126,0.00001716692,0.015052373,0.00048256744,0.00001801234,0.00016349943,0.0121961385,0.00037154162,0.0002651958,0.048051342,0.92330873,0.00006182636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92559886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9637429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07440114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037447978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027771486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27170533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947975783","doi":"10.7202/1059336ar","title":"L’appel des jugements interlocutoires en procédure civile québécoise","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014567524299276704,"score_gpt":0.26513150386613715,"score_spread":0.25056397956686044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947975783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072608724,0.0036009562,0.02491484,0.021468792,0.0012785139,0.0006167137,0.0016433579,0.0006237008,0.87324435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35280275,0.0021305536,0.009771551,0.0060084257,0.0001659716,0.0003583216,0.0007256147,0.00022901285,0.6278078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928126,0.0015587786,0.0002958004,0.00085043785,0.0027435718,0.0017388684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99112296,0.0016919186,0.000512686,0.000910016,0.0048888056,0.0008735745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031398183,0.0005100904,0.00035223807,0.0013373852,0.012076337,0.0061856136,0.0014757,0.0025545512,0.02527582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009342433,0.00039214516,0.0004951839,0.0020597812,0.0075341156,0.0018155073,0.0022130315,0.003580915,0.0048417505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007338175,0.00006241206,0.011753603,0.0002111106,0.000028138025,0.0008666511,0.04433301,0.0007557058,0.0028740626,0.6258707,0.2036947,0.109476484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009679475,0.000029308896,0.019432079,0.000213828,0.000013535381,0.00020396819,0.0062309564,0.00043762996,0.0007768915,0.0050283237,0.9675541,0.000069707574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91481155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.951934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08518845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03531658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.076570116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2562409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948171024","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198823834.013.16","title":"The Irish Courts and the Administrative State","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Irish; Statute","score_opus":0.03810746889144529,"score_gpt":0.2852539147976382,"score_spread":0.2471464459061929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948171024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030897316,0.0034759978,0.0006815133,0.034944545,0.00036694724,0.000023179127,0.00007422919,0.000022050937,0.92951417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9460284,0.0022557634,0.0006631474,0.006063453,0.00034435096,0.000042636682,0.00005248835,0.000017188313,0.04453267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301445,0.0026660631,0.00026226792,0.00065952446,0.0015789351,0.0018187112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656576,0.0010401504,0.0004725743,0.00021081184,0.0012094151,0.0005013374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035355217,0.00022293079,0.00028306097,0.002218599,0.0053464375,0.015877986,0.00095239416,0.0019671407,0.00763553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044810525,0.0002803542,0.0003531082,0.0020106216,0.027761001,0.0029412364,0.004237692,0.0043114484,0.00064217305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000544592,0.000008911658,0.00079628825,0.000020432457,0.000003299204,0.00006245931,0.0024668823,0.00011561422,0.000043772325,0.9857082,0.006597509,0.0041711205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056123718,0.000060152037,0.0117248045,0.0007646577,0.00003291483,0.0002045527,0.030775962,0.00076989323,0.0003428323,0.40293097,0.5522511,0.000086017266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1157361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12420222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1157361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029521741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022098666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23012489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948381335","doi":"","title":"THE IMPROBABLE RISE AND FALL OF AUCKLAND HARBOUR BOARD V THE KING","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Parliament; Jurisdiction; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Public administration; Business; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.019927657800610347,"score_gpt":0.28244493700424594,"score_spread":0.2625172792036356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948381335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12725589,0.006171403,0.0017180176,0.5428143,0.0034292834,0.00012762676,0.00023826702,0.00017411633,0.31807104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6911021,0.0012867625,0.0008711841,0.21213667,0.0006252056,0.00007028333,0.00006712798,0.00012847185,0.09371229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98027223,0.0028138254,0.0008292458,0.0032730019,0.006578236,0.0062334905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815092,0.007831055,0.0010549298,0.0008318563,0.004620408,0.0041525876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007627855,0.00037329565,0.0006046209,0.0013140899,0.018343946,0.01231138,0.0029282852,0.017056793,0.0071064103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03480479,0.00093467266,0.0006872978,0.0013044986,0.014778388,0.004608179,0.0048686205,0.018968856,0.00089074986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016629796,0.000070852504,0.010257331,0.00015488765,0.00007778071,0.005431152,0.018631112,0.00037807305,0.0014047505,0.68835026,0.23427235,0.040805154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015415852,0.00013683764,0.021371668,0.00080462376,0.00015430518,0.001063062,0.013186834,0.0010687012,0.0021150142,0.05545795,0.9040321,0.00045471778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84022766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9262463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84022766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05679842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052284032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4121033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948421026","doi":"","title":"INJUNCTIONS - THE ABILITY TO BIND NON-PARTIES","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Position (finance); Order (exchange); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Business; History","score_opus":0.06877479723390967,"score_gpt":0.3195584144455455,"score_spread":0.25078361721163583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948421026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028529469,0.003260557,0.10504465,0.02337072,0.0010377516,0.000676779,0.00012408881,0.000299662,0.83765644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7917053,0.0016116957,0.022231258,0.013215198,0.00078011316,0.0008229731,0.000076472425,0.00013591403,0.16942105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96844494,0.009345624,0.0022183922,0.0048193205,0.010902785,0.0042689587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97590864,0.01205931,0.0025597152,0.0055056857,0.002531628,0.0014350214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022199051,0.0008071393,0.0013170118,0.0026057258,0.0073075807,0.008364297,0.0038174214,0.009459722,0.010345352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036292396,0.0009968893,0.0013368642,0.0010302833,0.030502843,0.01002336,0.013487836,0.008164492,0.0027982474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007878757,0.00002163579,0.0003158208,0.000029191926,0.00000947209,0.00011361485,0.00069984834,0.000103409715,0.000297863,0.9907747,0.00145572,0.006170962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006972159,0.00014748635,0.0013555668,0.00035551956,0.000055948713,0.0004923597,0.00095524365,0.0006116808,0.001550685,0.8221969,0.1721296,0.00007925991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008533221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108264275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99146676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034052671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011340407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11740118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948860978","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Settlement Trusts: Recharacterizing the Nature of Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Tax avoidance; Tax reform; Ad valorem tax; Public economics; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Double taxation; Payment","score_opus":0.02072167989923257,"score_gpt":0.3388506069123572,"score_spread":0.3181289270131246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948860978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051431812,0.056154657,0.012543136,0.09317574,0.0018906317,0.00012850693,0.000058148096,0.00004634463,0.784571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8891888,0.037902635,0.0026842507,0.01570507,0.0012462084,0.000102739185,0.000040065803,0.000025765437,0.05310449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949955,0.001414506,0.00021653438,0.0005471112,0.0020024905,0.0008237492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766266,0.00095225184,0.0003197288,0.00025863235,0.0006522492,0.00015457081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042433315,0.00016790887,0.00028974036,0.0018210608,0.005596497,0.007640854,0.0016989876,0.0043946705,0.0021387606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007812014,0.0003203383,0.00046081186,0.0017335082,0.026273692,0.007642296,0.0031024625,0.006218522,0.00034041962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.1710507e-7,0.0000044663684,0.00015528953,0.00002239504,0.0000011589956,0.000055917717,0.0011196868,0.00009019083,0.000023517925,0.99270695,0.001643098,0.004176254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010434398,0.00002973402,0.0034053377,0.0012323034,0.00002409671,0.00028811957,0.0054031573,0.0011122152,0.00028844044,0.4953207,0.4928441,0.000041267587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122663654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1181941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8773363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015911385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02188653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24389935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948992539","doi":"","title":"Facticity: Judicial Review of Factual Error in Comparative Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Prerogative; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Administrative law; Commonwealth; Common law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03577750216303992,"score_gpt":0.3839838570238438,"score_spread":0.34820635486080387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948992539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043236718,0.09536551,0.109218046,0.07709543,0.0027751296,0.00019219579,0.00012709692,0.00014280464,0.67184705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94123137,0.016387286,0.017457312,0.006944587,0.0031227197,0.00020529931,0.000057510195,0.00007658112,0.014517279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.948028,0.035275765,0.0017799145,0.0030406609,0.009253447,0.0026220924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8977857,0.080083095,0.004839713,0.005102991,0.011449899,0.0007385215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03595148,0.00041148765,0.00092479034,0.007958452,0.0060383226,0.0150622185,0.0028093047,0.007050734,0.0037788637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09330532,0.00042679498,0.000598729,0.0054492466,0.03761766,0.01575555,0.0043379003,0.004870661,0.00030246226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070475535,0.0000048343813,0.0002543098,0.00008016428,0.00001024631,0.00017412838,0.0059098387,0.00031211,0.000064523556,0.9828503,0.0024901277,0.007842454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019579493,0.00006260981,0.0034304569,0.0014551091,0.00005171227,0.0005698028,0.008614378,0.0020092526,0.0006914685,0.7393539,0.24367267,0.000069087226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015136613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018666357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03595148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019406294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011049404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19013184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949668603","doi":"","title":"DAMAGES FOR IMPROVIDENT EMPLOYER BEHAVIOUR: TWO JUDICIAL APPROACHES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Notice; Damages; Law; Dismissal; Duty; Political science; Common law; Punitive damages; Discretion; Labour law; Bad faith; Judicial discretion; Judicial opinion; Judicial review","score_opus":0.13363396325925153,"score_gpt":0.36845483874094515,"score_spread":0.23482087548169361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949668603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026432952,0.016577989,0.08939303,0.038597193,0.0015848768,0.00046837787,0.00016920094,0.00015138432,0.8266251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81601405,0.009875276,0.03353723,0.01642488,0.0040055714,0.0010031224,0.00009222298,0.0001207658,0.11892684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98197454,0.0035646048,0.00065941195,0.0018120571,0.009643948,0.0023454179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910614,0.004351223,0.0006143392,0.0012344917,0.0023108036,0.00042779784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011028451,0.0008334844,0.00089426077,0.004002707,0.0046066395,0.012845516,0.0056808465,0.01697163,0.0062717325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0192402,0.0010423368,0.0015955232,0.001492573,0.022077166,0.008375826,0.005138926,0.010745361,0.0009956079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000477279,0.000014252615,0.000042070085,0.000015213919,0.0000022003912,0.000041221803,0.00040278348,0.00018218796,0.000071129456,0.9957397,0.00073695864,0.0027475685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007264813,0.000098810786,0.001205631,0.0005351369,0.000046944722,0.00029542638,0.0009233584,0.004814636,0.0009875398,0.9061839,0.08472406,0.000111746245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03006426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036129653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022951448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019845938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16652519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949960994","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2019.1605035","title":"Say on purpose: lessons from Chinese corporate charters","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Corporation; China; Corporate law; Function (biology); Empirical research; Accounting; Business; Public relations; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Law and economics; Management; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.11327191405026577,"score_gpt":0.3708078821274951,"score_spread":0.25753596807722934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949960994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45239952,0.0030861124,0.0063334056,0.03516928,0.00033839908,0.0001577553,0.00016228668,0.000057252728,0.5022961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848082,0.00094321603,0.0008309389,0.0010723496,0.000096581716,0.000032305255,0.000058821162,0.000021848158,0.012135639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727434,0.0012069119,0.00011353008,0.00026823624,0.0006200232,0.0005169886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914723,0.0057375687,0.0005166013,0.00060216745,0.0013090558,0.00036221746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066821105,0.00044883834,0.0004959274,0.0020693117,0.008127556,0.005998683,0.0012820985,0.0021747984,0.004368913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012030043,0.00025847275,0.0003235071,0.002837381,0.017919619,0.008796537,0.0029381588,0.0035483676,0.00033328735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036156078,0.00002472935,0.006331459,0.00008317321,0.0000067837823,0.00083768123,0.15281229,0.00023121413,0.00017322904,0.8169904,0.0046850326,0.017787825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006708276,0.00010647953,0.050237495,0.000969099,0.00010035628,0.00046755787,0.27365947,0.0046185935,0.0017132283,0.4227268,0.245202,0.00013173708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08612149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10347951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08612149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010899453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012023613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17124045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950114440","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i3.4735","title":"Fiducia in Public Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Private law; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Public law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0487478028784544,"score_gpt":0.30280212028204084,"score_spread":0.2540543174035864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950114440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011780915,0.12664215,0.023496626,0.11289412,0.001673337,0.0000846771,0.00008943361,0.000084830834,0.723254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8005231,0.04540847,0.008348593,0.050343294,0.002344447,0.00022557029,0.00011262814,0.00011064571,0.09258326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859147,0.006482431,0.00052074535,0.0012754144,0.003850946,0.0019557055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183196,0.0046347403,0.0006176366,0.0008750398,0.0016761298,0.0003644881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012172441,0.00034709458,0.0006923127,0.003208947,0.006846199,0.010580003,0.0016428205,0.00877423,0.005001487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017451312,0.000489125,0.0007898208,0.0024657864,0.031235553,0.008731424,0.0039618677,0.011088504,0.0009486159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6182986e-7,0.0000031939012,0.00003676675,0.000017795728,0.000001247488,0.000008693722,0.00028285495,0.000040658408,0.0000067373253,0.9938022,0.003183307,0.0026159023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000763992,0.00001619535,0.00062359736,0.00062991877,0.0000098621085,0.000093302035,0.0008231795,0.0002561822,0.00009599991,0.6234657,0.37395886,0.000019639669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06327166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049138036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06327166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020640716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019178765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14975959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950140100","doi":"","title":"Apex Courts and the Common Law: Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Apex (geometry); Political science; Dispute resolution; Legal profession; Position (finance); Jurisprudence; Business","score_opus":0.005204800107788838,"score_gpt":0.2611055218755645,"score_spread":0.2559007217677757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950140100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015146486,0.080029085,0.011196513,0.07003239,0.0030162262,0.000056035515,0.0001939,0.00008830442,0.8202411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7658968,0.05594537,0.0039991396,0.020431694,0.008962551,0.00014203318,0.00021605342,0.00017312483,0.14423314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965538,0.001369145,0.00011407262,0.0004885069,0.0010052229,0.0004692731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957457,0.0024171285,0.0003576992,0.00036943317,0.0007231836,0.00038697236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021327082,0.00039406907,0.00041083308,0.0022152986,0.0051136953,0.014228123,0.0015314245,0.004377086,0.017274335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058064945,0.0002598453,0.000504074,0.0028655273,0.017787628,0.010088715,0.0061623324,0.006565017,0.0015925098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017348417,0.0000023838927,0.000076985125,0.000016081513,7.3365123e-7,0.00002480092,0.0005549639,0.00006147261,0.000011548379,0.99296933,0.003646741,0.002633195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049834644,0.000015596475,0.0005551853,0.00033265597,0.0000058465985,0.00014065116,0.001425027,0.00039312238,0.00007092865,0.6797524,0.31729198,0.000011688743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0095515745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051506604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017274335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009284938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00474449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067367315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950720224","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0022","title":"Marriage, work, and the invention of family law in English legal thought","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Wife; Domestic relations; Law; Cognitive reframing; Ideology; Situated; Sociology; Relation (database); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012096950998904352,"score_gpt":0.23526338550525075,"score_spread":0.2231664345063464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950720224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36397612,0.052333143,0.014554465,0.06289331,0.0009866051,0.00005036344,0.000058154572,0.00006015024,0.5050876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981005,0.004156316,0.0007697763,0.0011103373,0.00027349382,0.000014739278,0.000009765044,0.000017718383,0.012642855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973622,0.0016918432,0.000089984096,0.0001770962,0.00035702638,0.00032183022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997244,0.0020459634,0.00019821784,0.00011870514,0.00022037808,0.00017271332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037466057,0.00016931999,0.00026445033,0.0018714098,0.008534057,0.0053971107,0.0005777026,0.0016107507,0.0022360554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00481376,0.00021345277,0.00018077402,0.0009840098,0.028143616,0.0057105133,0.0025050582,0.0022939623,0.00022040894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071922523,0.000010427667,0.00039502597,0.000024878635,9.643238e-7,0.00022975175,0.14781061,0.0000441655,0.00006780292,0.8444104,0.0012358486,0.0057628388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026844364,0.000060054277,0.0047251196,0.00051942276,0.000008513269,0.00060023443,0.12986304,0.0007210769,0.00043782158,0.40512702,0.4578735,0.000037367223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01982437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017632466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01982437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008230872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002652049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059719503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951349879","doi":"","title":"The Canada Not-for-Profit Corporations Act and Quebec Trust Law: A New opportunity for Quebec Donors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Trust law; Business; Authorization; Context (archaeology); Profit (economics); Blind trust; Law; Asset (computer security); Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07197905959020684,"score_gpt":0.31012826669265336,"score_spread":0.23814920710244653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951349879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008921633,0.067657456,0.0020275856,0.64573425,0.006233378,0.000121471036,0.0011406987,0.00012868905,0.26803488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29157084,0.0414036,0.006312637,0.2994813,0.0023720434,0.00020134449,0.0008239173,0.00016580272,0.35766855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98811847,0.0018232312,0.00038990745,0.0006981755,0.005772241,0.003197982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784822,0.0052452898,0.0009644004,0.00066970557,0.011884358,0.0027540354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007766138,0.0005202264,0.0006169275,0.0025661378,0.014309214,0.013029176,0.0036218541,0.011972171,0.01130339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018836223,0.000624453,0.00093391066,0.0035101874,0.008433903,0.0037618487,0.0022633688,0.009440806,0.0009995264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024050405,0.000022551505,0.0016105926,0.00020582463,0.000020221478,0.0002912144,0.0018158704,0.00026953116,0.00013660287,0.43767092,0.53573346,0.022199199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016746948,0.000009358304,0.0036885322,0.00064555794,0.000029623945,0.00007088613,0.0015147271,0.0002911266,0.000103105565,0.007937777,0.98562,0.000072589566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1583694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1583694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32397628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9761722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951382998","doi":"","title":"RETURN OF THE UNDEAD: FUNDAMENTAL BREACH DISINTERRED","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Bad faith; Breach of contract; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Damages","score_opus":0.042202756622093496,"score_gpt":0.34220507746431306,"score_spread":0.30000232084221956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951382998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09924804,0.011147144,0.02599696,0.2628648,0.0020769837,0.000120590616,0.00011560425,0.00014524977,0.59828466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9124251,0.0025351823,0.0028096612,0.029747652,0.00038402947,0.00003021908,0.000044900484,0.0000621482,0.051961146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97684073,0.0056070234,0.0007989497,0.0022865233,0.010170111,0.0042966846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97631365,0.009522372,0.0014870536,0.0028764948,0.008302988,0.0014975037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022176942,0.00024786612,0.0006301467,0.0017031854,0.013433088,0.011143694,0.0025781475,0.0084309485,0.005442165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056669787,0.00037037194,0.0005240863,0.0013395196,0.032168496,0.007391072,0.006822052,0.014862105,0.00061876356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009531397,0.000006233193,0.0005912741,0.000025676965,0.0000044018357,0.00017686366,0.00404988,0.00008525441,0.00012275454,0.9694529,0.009624636,0.015850654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001863432,0.000054006905,0.004697917,0.0005730348,0.000030619543,0.000775166,0.0155738825,0.00087498454,0.0010824057,0.60907954,0.36715236,0.0000875226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21383376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29664385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21383376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019180039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041992825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42517817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951531909","doi":"","title":"THE ATTACHMENT OF CHARITABLE PROPERTY AT LAW AND IN EQUITY: OR, WHY THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL IN RE CHRISTIAN BROTHERS OF IRELAND IN CANADA IS RIGHTS AND ITS CRITICS ARE WRONG","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Indemnity; Insolvency; Equity (law); Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.050197672895852516,"score_gpt":0.30455500081171716,"score_spread":0.25435732791586463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951531909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023715887,0.0087593,0.0031968388,0.6569881,0.0028430289,0.000058443642,0.00023750692,0.00007108891,0.30412987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62409544,0.0033441787,0.0015079821,0.20543106,0.0013703123,0.0000695246,0.00010214328,0.00017519118,0.16390412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862834,0.0019152914,0.00034041118,0.0017932063,0.0056157187,0.0040519275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930339,0.0020641251,0.00032705406,0.0005430383,0.0029262928,0.0011055595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007565192,0.00050991535,0.0006592847,0.0009411249,0.020828294,0.017786978,0.0030803797,0.017238455,0.0051110494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019067673,0.000551315,0.0007562451,0.0010985417,0.04859681,0.00830094,0.0040590367,0.016898112,0.00072437176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019410141,0.0000116676,0.0006768711,0.000028733528,0.000010915278,0.00026274132,0.005198063,0.00010627631,0.0001565694,0.9208737,0.06837544,0.004279606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007869472,0.000021240188,0.0037731396,0.00040660775,0.00005397412,0.00018502778,0.011655448,0.0006813693,0.0006722869,0.23922917,0.7430615,0.00018169213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95046973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9524194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1010314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1010314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73303753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952393837","doi":"","title":"Moving beyond Uberrima Fides? the General Duty of Honesty in Contractual Performance and Punitive Damage Awards in Anglo-Canadian Contract Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Fides; Law; Honesty; Duty; Unjust enrichment; Tort; Business; Political science; Liability; Philosophy; Restitution; Theology","score_opus":0.016780272255379574,"score_gpt":0.2867413488882816,"score_spread":0.26996107663290203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952393837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18368007,0.0065537994,0.005263048,0.2902775,0.00077377254,0.00008806124,0.000120096796,0.00003337618,0.51321024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96222687,0.0010111132,0.0008605539,0.0114494525,0.00014271656,0.000024309533,0.000012300255,0.000020738229,0.02425204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98386705,0.003997984,0.00049361726,0.0012488749,0.0045115603,0.0058808657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98220855,0.007141998,0.0012042735,0.0010423302,0.005764106,0.0026387547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016272215,0.00034379063,0.0006689213,0.0017392111,0.024987515,0.01716808,0.0025885848,0.009010851,0.00696101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038212802,0.0006649839,0.00043147005,0.0020071866,0.042557873,0.008729389,0.0049768756,0.012875299,0.00045287848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002307462,0.000028760185,0.002734956,0.000023259543,0.000007516795,0.000080752754,0.016939625,0.00022008078,0.00009603144,0.9594496,0.008239852,0.0121565955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067819376,0.000057915182,0.041198812,0.0009219068,0.000111381756,0.00031012465,0.09520672,0.00257984,0.00056063477,0.6372628,0.22140141,0.0003206264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9456483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.971962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067271166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067271166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1229358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48808873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952608107","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-05-22","title":"Damages without duty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Duty; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01019217149654458,"score_gpt":0.25134800550708025,"score_spread":0.24115583401053567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952608107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006400375,0.0074385726,0.02185909,0.07602308,0.0026917523,0.000093410155,0.00034534038,0.00009202987,0.8850563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51628387,0.0058540734,0.0106521305,0.075407155,0.0040934407,0.00031129897,0.00029623983,0.00019282487,0.38690898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898606,0.0017885118,0.0006773396,0.0019985493,0.00473025,0.0009447994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588567,0.0017181115,0.0002876158,0.00084699685,0.0010700389,0.00019154829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064672446,0.0007484569,0.0009074775,0.0014389874,0.0043909564,0.006574432,0.0016659889,0.0105655175,0.01586399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015562148,0.000634568,0.0009303178,0.0007476478,0.014261306,0.007735861,0.0043042693,0.009412447,0.0033092268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023079565,0.0000029393195,0.000038890612,0.000011193598,0.0000023785951,0.000016039594,0.00010353853,0.00004600321,0.00003753914,0.99218667,0.005961701,0.0015907226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012215886,0.00003098663,0.00039711432,0.00014496622,0.000011756141,0.0001943373,0.00016626705,0.00027022086,0.0003412501,0.6849844,0.31342122,0.00002526548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012797698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013620137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01586399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058746547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051866733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053070307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954005072","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0023","title":"The patriation of Canadian corporate law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Common law; Political science; English law; Corporate law; Legislation; Comparative law; Sources of law; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Business","score_opus":0.01927071117823441,"score_gpt":0.21882490558066606,"score_spread":0.19955419440243166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954005072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11315629,0.028506173,0.0028464482,0.043800484,0.0007674266,0.00005129928,0.0017075373,0.00013663861,0.80902773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90813804,0.018301077,0.0018892441,0.0038970697,0.0003122446,0.00002082972,0.0005498197,0.000085715255,0.066806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930067,0.00049203,0.00012672266,0.00080519484,0.0042948187,0.0012744834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922506,0.0012475597,0.00059445045,0.00034823976,0.004977676,0.00058137375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001845937,0.00029358297,0.00032196008,0.009698808,0.013512552,0.0111104455,0.00125248,0.0020260564,0.0043058777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010153399,0.00028019014,0.00034774176,0.016642496,0.011022149,0.0024862222,0.0018012098,0.0022119074,0.00036927284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014106711,0.0000051372645,0.007626373,0.00015030564,0.00001736198,0.00038551007,0.020409262,0.0003540361,0.00031287037,0.8693933,0.039485022,0.061846714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020235625,0.0000054728594,0.021725558,0.00027250272,0.00002407252,0.00021786957,0.0052609392,0.00037126627,0.00024271404,0.012784272,0.9590456,0.00004758253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99027073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85094535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14905468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11390184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98697597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954244999","doi":"","title":"Cancelling a Holding Deposit Agreement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Leasehold estate; Business; Damages; Third party; Subject (documents); Law; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.011670044194523181,"score_gpt":0.2825201813081332,"score_spread":0.27085013711361006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954244999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12442649,0.0007601834,0.057008706,0.022670163,0.00439444,0.0022525026,0.0005866935,0.0010463852,0.78685445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53391075,0.00033940648,0.027932897,0.009957514,0.0006493464,0.0006554912,0.0003905159,0.000271257,0.42589283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97683525,0.0037227308,0.0021602267,0.00329788,0.008893785,0.005090131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797636,0.0067622056,0.0013287127,0.0032438503,0.005727694,0.0031739266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021182211,0.00050612865,0.0010155138,0.0010687807,0.007986699,0.009040446,0.0029395488,0.007847758,0.039070737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04344639,0.0007642366,0.00096452417,0.00056558585,0.0049509634,0.005239786,0.0063099554,0.009821978,0.0108966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002061503,0.00023121893,0.0036162585,0.00007700461,0.000022283328,0.001943394,0.004765124,0.00075265364,0.0027298462,0.9173175,0.040600095,0.027738493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014466704,0.00038224948,0.003116954,0.00031076974,0.00004541007,0.0009912882,0.0037635502,0.0029737176,0.0029544572,0.12798095,0.8571535,0.0001825849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027081644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02525992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039070737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063271318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029784434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13070458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956811029","doi":"10.5937/spz63-20473","title":"Fiduciary transfer of ownership: One or more ownerships?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strani pravni zivot","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Fiduciary; Beneficiary; Business; Trust law; Creditor; Blind trust; Database transaction; Law; Estate planning; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics; Duty; Estate; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.061874682099831595,"score_gpt":0.33078795820059315,"score_spread":0.26891327610076154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956811029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12972903,0.00697848,0.118416026,0.06402035,0.0012046479,0.00011895341,0.00022960553,0.00019395279,0.67910904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638315,0.0007913775,0.005298053,0.0028443397,0.00032229812,0.00008654217,0.000036128098,0.000048981732,0.026740827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297017,0.002288442,0.00032502823,0.0015183286,0.0014333474,0.0014646308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499124,0.0015825973,0.0006744872,0.0016669044,0.0006685022,0.00041630268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064425175,0.00036026738,0.00070563453,0.0010956326,0.00443918,0.007662796,0.0016203807,0.004279298,0.0069090025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011050149,0.00038557386,0.00076097547,0.0012097856,0.038847197,0.0154887065,0.005925879,0.0059869215,0.0008046934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031929821,0.0000032753917,0.00014503863,0.0000061160927,0.0000013400455,0.000031899035,0.0014093474,0.000018717225,0.000029921766,0.99555546,0.0006132672,0.0021823246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020217016,0.000044444252,0.0011760406,0.00022755621,0.000012574165,0.0004433451,0.002619843,0.0006108411,0.00038126652,0.8957668,0.09866116,0.000035910904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008861324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00511143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008861324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070799077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040154257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051368594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957456258","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634100.013.31","title":"Fiduciary Principles in Contemporary Common Law Systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of care; Duty of loyalty; Statute; Duty; Doctrine; Common law; Law; Political science; Loyalty; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.13027135381807295,"score_gpt":0.35381149249840804,"score_spread":0.2235401386803351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957456258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026688255,0.01718442,0.23362452,0.0474839,0.0009301086,0.00030175748,0.00026976824,0.00025531946,0.67326206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8151434,0.011959272,0.113363944,0.014204365,0.0017202557,0.0010016384,0.0003164505,0.00015128046,0.042139385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749995,0.008699246,0.001830526,0.0029293417,0.009820065,0.0017213274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856489,0.0081122145,0.00114336,0.002004794,0.002714321,0.00037641477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02160759,0.0005192992,0.0009774738,0.0042489544,0.009106143,0.015619898,0.0025333997,0.007847416,0.0038074593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025416877,0.00079721975,0.00094628154,0.004710357,0.053781196,0.012950726,0.005245396,0.009709948,0.0012103267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.350874e-7,0.0000015878611,0.0000204687,0.000004728323,5.8361246e-7,0.0000053024346,0.00027360715,0.00011253021,0.0000063638195,0.9982717,0.00039269598,0.0009100411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000391184,0.000006424856,0.000116470386,0.00008836196,0.0000024886356,0.000028968914,0.00027053716,0.00041412716,0.00004087801,0.9572649,0.041752167,0.000010837184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017287599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010358875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02160759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014890147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01419384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11427325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963420193","doi":"10.29173/alr2556","title":"Justice Jean E. L. Côté, The Court of Appeal, and the Changing Nature of Contract Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital; Stephen Lewis Foundation; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.018138512199004208,"score_gpt":0.32201244579554406,"score_spread":0.30387393359653986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963420193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033159228,0.08138104,0.001241986,0.68901885,0.008286648,0.000067387904,0.00047161875,0.000071730086,0.21614492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12781416,0.036530834,0.0021325739,0.4947524,0.006899267,0.00017303583,0.0003218495,0.00013416952,0.3312417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324083,0.001054272,0.0002794862,0.00071682566,0.0034197497,0.0012888811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920833,0.0044363453,0.00019134907,0.00018400665,0.0025252525,0.0005798174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052550957,0.00049280224,0.00063101755,0.001531162,0.014011424,0.009633675,0.002024652,0.021582,0.01205968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01778103,0.0007344886,0.0008323174,0.0018671047,0.007417583,0.003931467,0.001520921,0.01311255,0.0020481932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020640937,0.000014556699,0.00052858266,0.00007972934,0.000008396345,0.00017953376,0.0005769964,0.00014350541,0.00013919466,0.31482533,0.6747391,0.008744371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033475728,0.000014883153,0.0036122324,0.00046790653,0.000021011763,0.00012981758,0.0012499077,0.00029139398,0.00021757963,0.07039149,0.9235194,0.000051028037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5273826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73809415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4726174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014727257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028932884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95080143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963484862","doi":"10.29173/alr2544","title":"Litigating on One's Doorstep: Access to Justice and the Question of Venue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Eviction; Enforcement; Debtor; Law; Law enforcement; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Debt; Creditor; Finance","score_opus":0.03889784876769241,"score_gpt":0.38305976953369986,"score_spread":0.34416192076600743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963484862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034663957,0.1346793,0.0034549583,0.19987673,0.0015303222,0.00006633365,0.00010023956,0.00005051887,0.6255776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7997939,0.0571102,0.001548476,0.05369108,0.0010580294,0.000083587045,0.00006392945,0.000044701686,0.08660601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98882294,0.0040518017,0.0003157908,0.0007049636,0.0028532615,0.003251308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99232495,0.004335193,0.0005122986,0.0003353286,0.0014872975,0.0010048883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008543196,0.00017372095,0.00072471047,0.001711581,0.008901282,0.010287685,0.0028104202,0.009660759,0.0060951523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012986072,0.00039049645,0.0005184786,0.0019709105,0.022248488,0.00512842,0.004118479,0.006555555,0.00083629024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001074315,0.00003243717,0.0012259678,0.00012626195,0.000012907108,0.0003337357,0.0033337718,0.00024413921,0.00010961921,0.93264675,0.031586412,0.03033719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049499416,0.000079679645,0.016252613,0.0017938901,0.00006855726,0.0004221337,0.014816434,0.00040257076,0.00025382655,0.33649287,0.62927353,0.00009443648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.513431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6623852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.486569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01849973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05872539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97886896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963746280","doi":"10.29173/alr2554","title":"Beware of Tiger: The Logic of Justice Jean E. L. Côté's Tort Law","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Tiger; Law; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Liability; Algorithm","score_opus":0.03666834150768108,"score_gpt":0.3293167625038234,"score_spread":0.29264842099614236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963746280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0081693595,0.05211231,0.004936431,0.5656784,0.0021736356,0.000024949937,0.00015662957,0.000083032995,0.36666524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6095199,0.037935708,0.0029880246,0.1407241,0.003165436,0.00007371428,0.00009485224,0.00014830873,0.20534986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585307,0.0014756154,0.00008560426,0.00036053217,0.001505211,0.0007200345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941123,0.0034506626,0.0002463503,0.00024810166,0.0015821015,0.0003605158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005702851,0.00034465583,0.00048828003,0.00159107,0.008767274,0.01297093,0.0013335777,0.008366639,0.006533738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013019626,0.0003943637,0.0003665679,0.0014614669,0.021381704,0.0060318783,0.001704651,0.008027137,0.00074501487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067504866,0.000004081356,0.00012161142,0.00002093559,0.0000033139827,0.000057507103,0.000594125,0.00015751003,0.00003683696,0.9234187,0.07056049,0.005018194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019557725,0.000012549371,0.0014488171,0.00045383137,0.000020084402,0.000083532,0.0021470264,0.0006474424,0.00015595464,0.7107555,0.28422394,0.00003182662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2943739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39759597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70562613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020541806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025709206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58532095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964064122","doi":"","title":"Good Faith between Public and Private","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Autonomy; Personhood; Doctrine; Fair dealing; Law; Meaning (existential); Political science; Relational contract; Law and economics; Common law; Private law; Sociology; Epistemology; Good faith; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030901447963001944,"score_gpt":0.3212494175729185,"score_spread":0.2903479696099166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964064122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03180732,0.0017266356,0.030408978,0.084885485,0.0004244691,0.000095624346,0.00010980346,0.00013182913,0.85040987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527578,0.0003522389,0.0025955632,0.0070382273,0.000088486195,0.000039502364,0.00003635396,0.000056072477,0.037035853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759688,0.0081338165,0.000666577,0.002957726,0.0077147777,0.0045582606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858562,0.0052673137,0.000746517,0.003416551,0.003022816,0.0016905928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011975279,0.0004097004,0.00066917,0.0014378437,0.015070066,0.021603588,0.0017566911,0.0062738345,0.008004528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024106462,0.0004972474,0.00053635763,0.001564966,0.058091816,0.013336168,0.0082425615,0.009231595,0.001033622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056706326,0.0000078985395,0.0002328915,0.000007685503,0.0000026755026,0.000037480186,0.005547931,0.00005648442,0.00004925808,0.98668087,0.0031583614,0.0042127655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017176233,0.000021616926,0.0011733103,0.00021456649,0.000015007445,0.00012847038,0.012083722,0.0006083514,0.00041196865,0.75934,0.22594419,0.000041615054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20653288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.212632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20653288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024037294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037589118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41066146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964638793","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.48","title":"Exceptional Procedures to Correct Miscarriages of Justice in Common Law Systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Appeal; Commission; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Collateral; Law reform; Royal Commission; Politics; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.04501358708682981,"score_gpt":0.3537681719494644,"score_spread":0.30875458486263463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964638793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13565093,0.01657549,0.26048177,0.03128639,0.0033560994,0.0013211955,0.00032492017,0.0028283582,0.5481748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8442316,0.005234739,0.098048866,0.006448988,0.00090236997,0.0004544969,0.00022836262,0.00037000165,0.044080585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95853657,0.013291256,0.0037167359,0.0026169252,0.017600168,0.0042383843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96549857,0.014824406,0.004794291,0.005727791,0.0072460393,0.0019088933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018244311,0.00035398183,0.0005821643,0.0064115683,0.0065398724,0.008540397,0.0026490993,0.0035779679,0.005627807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06689404,0.00050430204,0.0007236356,0.0029388657,0.010485078,0.008461495,0.009779475,0.0051037343,0.0016213654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023350483,0.00011280572,0.0038680097,0.00028038773,0.000023665016,0.0006017077,0.00828908,0.0014130307,0.0008668278,0.78357655,0.018049533,0.18289502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032852546,0.00029612597,0.010952834,0.002683982,0.00006585575,0.0022748027,0.008616066,0.0045063826,0.005956259,0.34790438,0.6164673,0.00024317646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007943095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014024914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018244311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004758923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013616205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09648627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964923292","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1365","title":"Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator: A “Frack-tious” Divide on Statutory Immunities and Charter Damages","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Supreme court; Damages; Law; Political science; Plaintiff; Tribunal","score_opus":0.018979849479046115,"score_gpt":0.2877238270162798,"score_spread":0.26874397753723367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964923292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067551546,0.020218857,0.005079007,0.26740116,0.0027279586,0.0001723957,0.0006481127,0.00025362815,0.6359473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6092611,0.0054771826,0.004317183,0.2163874,0.00077175145,0.0001383184,0.00025698764,0.00008401021,0.16330607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860241,0.0011393343,0.0002725222,0.0010467914,0.008341493,0.0031758805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993232,0.0035569153,0.00021788289,0.00019375967,0.0021212953,0.0006782166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066321823,0.00049761106,0.00060314575,0.0023754903,0.016215015,0.010743668,0.0039200988,0.019046592,0.004306937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105967475,0.00095863105,0.0009675947,0.0023032816,0.011149554,0.0028568031,0.002257454,0.013985723,0.00045799516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004844837,0.00003117317,0.0017309003,0.000058410697,0.000024029267,0.0005226412,0.0025516916,0.00038543082,0.000794723,0.9023984,0.079368345,0.012085884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028337399,0.00013852425,0.025538115,0.0010736934,0.0002791209,0.00041604065,0.0071787075,0.0026628773,0.0032203263,0.17969604,0.7789762,0.00053695036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98415667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05510911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05510911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1278796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3998465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965103463","doi":"","title":"LES LIMITES DE LA BONNE FOI EN MATIERE DE VENTE: LE CAS DES VICES CACHES","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warranty; Duty; Notice; Obligation; Liability; Business; Damages; Law; Civil code; Real estate; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04779902939710829,"score_gpt":0.33278136753259063,"score_spread":0.28498233813548235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965103463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08457458,0.012068681,0.0032411767,0.030828794,0.00041152822,0.000026398773,0.00018042592,0.0000791959,0.8685893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87272006,0.0036702729,0.0010985896,0.001669037,0.00022721932,0.000025604459,0.00005487456,0.00006749512,0.12046694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633384,0.0006558041,0.000074647425,0.00034307863,0.0013598261,0.0012328388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501747,0.0016673584,0.0004800994,0.0004479741,0.0016175488,0.0007695665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030796374,0.00033936003,0.0005210375,0.0019707596,0.010185952,0.010436342,0.0012121374,0.0034069729,0.02443543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013266496,0.00045750692,0.00050706515,0.0013984678,0.012525295,0.0047829016,0.0026224335,0.003886992,0.001874313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003567572,0.0000134251095,0.002381056,0.00003613921,0.0000065869453,0.00033393354,0.00398329,0.0002854881,0.0001257522,0.96299577,0.014152285,0.015650606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003218731,0.000043990596,0.019177083,0.00066773494,0.000043523185,0.0012184294,0.016168652,0.0015233068,0.00042958095,0.22009093,0.74052113,0.00008336905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46816874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5631508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46816874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018700669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013462608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9308874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965932931","doi":"","title":"The Breach of the Standard of Care [Common Law Tort of Negligence] and the Concept of Fault in Personal Extracontractual Liability (Civil Law) in Canada: A Comparative Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Delict; Tort; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal liability; Liability; Common law; Political science; Personal injury; Reasonable person; Private law; Comparative law; Public law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.016762944335002212,"score_gpt":0.3204370153630276,"score_spread":0.3036740710280254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965932931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9149936,0.008133585,0.00041571038,0.0067068813,0.000052541498,0.00005507194,0.00019261561,0.0000066406988,0.069443345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952983,0.0026875935,0.00014214494,0.00021125835,0.0000065374506,0.000007787567,0.00004295761,0.0000039310444,0.00159955],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523926,0.0009219211,0.00014383184,0.00029927885,0.0022458367,0.0011498085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906826,0.0040189316,0.001432537,0.0001644072,0.002666419,0.0010350484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003613209,0.00024442057,0.0006032869,0.0052967146,0.015292318,0.007080316,0.001723024,0.001493288,0.0031934343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016428547,0.00029536572,0.00034475393,0.014372544,0.016439492,0.003184313,0.0030190183,0.002166433,0.00012306908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014520538,0.00024441202,0.14493534,0.0006059553,0.00008942986,0.00095460465,0.45396385,0.0011202254,0.0003776298,0.3281968,0.0063649598,0.063001655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020391753,0.00007148755,0.43829083,0.0009737631,0.000107616215,0.00034646597,0.5029807,0.0011820677,0.00015271387,0.010605754,0.04517682,0.000091276794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99732614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17938444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17938444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14655687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9517977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968742712","doi":"","title":"Good Faith in Contract: A Judicial Dialogue Between Common Law Canada and Québec","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Political science; Doctrine; Supreme court; Common law; Jurisdiction; Duty; Faith; High Court; Bad faith; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006972220576996508,"score_gpt":0.24953651394237716,"score_spread":0.24256429336538066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968742712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29569942,0.021024782,0.0050492203,0.40974316,0.0011959799,0.000103447375,0.0002919358,0.00008061847,0.2668114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96314406,0.0016811101,0.0007932105,0.015050518,0.00007341222,0.00001755615,0.000030193522,0.000023536544,0.019186417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881245,0.0040755724,0.0002215476,0.0010260404,0.0030041996,0.0035480354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819843,0.008948932,0.0006151708,0.00042020113,0.0049500414,0.00308129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009591249,0.00028767408,0.0005200402,0.0017282483,0.04945488,0.019003248,0.0027789883,0.007358295,0.0040162303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01779772,0.0004511218,0.00043223862,0.003222106,0.026382593,0.0038740842,0.003911305,0.008192124,0.00015801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006411651,0.000050050174,0.0077604777,0.0000777477,0.000037472302,0.00203309,0.18510257,0.0010875764,0.0007682869,0.7103539,0.06516833,0.027496358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041569012,0.000045462373,0.019935086,0.0005147604,0.000059166847,0.00041071067,0.21748622,0.002277286,0.00070551265,0.039062593,0.71916264,0.0002989851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99461526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23926489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23926489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22762017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8823449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969451865","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.21","title":"Contract Damages, Moral Agency, and Henry James’ <i>The Ambassadors</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Moral agency; Financial compensation; Agency cost; Law; Economics; Breach of contract; Actuarial science; Business; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019547925876030298,"score_gpt":0.28231352270139554,"score_spread":0.26276559682536527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969451865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07505784,0.0070354454,0.009599042,0.14058937,0.001443457,0.0000693165,0.00005435383,0.000045409477,0.7661057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94368696,0.001032523,0.0011461667,0.007072574,0.0006809585,0.00004314139,0.000008823303,0.000016736789,0.04631211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541277,0.0020450784,0.0001280243,0.00040559765,0.0014256417,0.0005829574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744874,0.0013300786,0.00038186586,0.00019666614,0.0003462889,0.00029625098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048034936,0.000347786,0.00031047195,0.0008727729,0.0051083127,0.00927195,0.0010917516,0.0055565396,0.0066382475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007977652,0.0002639747,0.0002944452,0.00047464564,0.02482375,0.0046242606,0.0034622569,0.0070953267,0.00041361488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000549901,0.000009057692,0.00004812039,0.0000080314085,0.0000014433838,0.00005362405,0.0020795595,0.000068651905,0.00004397796,0.9927636,0.0033410313,0.0015772977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030119405,0.000046052086,0.0007465573,0.00022434077,0.000012004975,0.00029570874,0.005751397,0.0007584141,0.00042960385,0.678686,0.31296805,0.000051790794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008807415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005811548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009597587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009597587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003551461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06963569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970364905","doi":"","title":"Realizing Administrative Aboriginal Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.050475193050727896,"score_gpt":0.3829787923175869,"score_spread":0.332503599266859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970364905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037876014,0.009776967,0.016401047,0.12757294,0.0047208215,0.00012119338,0.000076271215,0.00051462825,0.80294013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55521834,0.009766336,0.033216186,0.016514502,0.0011429681,0.00014893166,0.000093838345,0.00029014138,0.3836087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982132,0.0006668351,0.000054439228,0.00013770885,0.00046266592,0.00046531422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876666,0.00032414947,0.000049766953,0.00012497364,0.0003491937,0.00038525142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032224737,0.00035974485,0.00016068688,0.0006987816,0.01539103,0.012240571,0.0010769884,0.004199812,0.0075904415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032773535,0.0004189614,0.00040004626,0.0003995148,0.010289529,0.0043838164,0.0054586893,0.005798979,0.0016467472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010410952,0.000025995343,0.0013477728,0.0001576295,0.000006704012,0.00075689703,0.13568883,0.00034704796,0.001799288,0.6895144,0.10340537,0.06693972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026118714,0.000014778629,0.0013042063,0.00020912294,0.0000052383916,0.0002162946,0.038303267,0.00018409103,0.00047258005,0.02681083,0.9324656,0.000011333231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21258005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4821789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21258005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014782462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0317945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42268538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971261347","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz030","title":"Identifying borrowed sources in secured transactions law reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Statute; Order (exchange); Business; Security interest; Law; Law and economics; Law reform; Work (physics); Uniform Commercial Code; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03014785700823235,"score_gpt":0.32824674827119976,"score_spread":0.2980988912629674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971261347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9051336,0.0026774353,0.00540343,0.008496315,0.00006500787,0.00021995383,0.00029542806,0.000038677405,0.07767021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944159,0.00075703516,0.0009133198,0.00048874604,0.000065831,0.000079463316,0.00009417435,0.000016234319,0.0031693766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98888993,0.0039322227,0.0009134817,0.0008914564,0.003941192,0.0014316177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449354,0.02520761,0.01950386,0.003532868,0.00509764,0.0017226577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008671061,0.00020413323,0.0005759046,0.0074085454,0.004293183,0.008789875,0.0015107299,0.0027179064,0.006157274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043804687,0.000605312,0.00047261265,0.009016176,0.009455988,0.007800573,0.009602742,0.0042039026,0.00039491715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015567747,0.00030003814,0.14053129,0.0004871512,0.00011665932,0.004003562,0.10317493,0.0020406854,0.0021342803,0.6845047,0.0053034252,0.05724756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012696159,0.00042170778,0.40274987,0.0037395142,0.00022755808,0.0024330348,0.1893244,0.012183656,0.007314428,0.20390144,0.17731224,0.00026522536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074411565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011986714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013506356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013506356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045760986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09799594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971747884","doi":"10.21991/cf29386","title":"Declarations of Invalidity in Superior Courts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Declaration; Statute; Political science; Plaintiff; Section (typography); Doctrine; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.0271129156239343,"score_gpt":0.3023245000844432,"score_spread":0.2752115844605089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971747884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20079024,0.005881823,0.0115115605,0.066090174,0.0010295275,0.0001248268,0.00031419875,0.00016538378,0.71409225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95166695,0.0009486674,0.001912555,0.0120236,0.0006327936,0.00006428696,0.00009012107,0.00003320717,0.032627836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703212,0.008686234,0.0022495508,0.0025035795,0.0103199845,0.0059194453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97209686,0.014891245,0.0034068606,0.0035951564,0.0049032294,0.0011066751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01867097,0.0002779276,0.0007297995,0.002027502,0.015968125,0.014407868,0.0019666913,0.010136635,0.0047299783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049800746,0.0011390689,0.00059053086,0.0024153327,0.01898981,0.0077503794,0.00883434,0.013476743,0.0006191113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071812487,0.000008579745,0.0011411863,0.00001663019,0.0000040964924,0.00036211323,0.008681663,0.00018507567,0.00013724843,0.9787008,0.0073644565,0.0033909467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055392607,0.00006856526,0.007964181,0.0008243371,0.000050940354,0.0006340285,0.008591966,0.002478431,0.0018361909,0.46417704,0.5131591,0.00015982379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1268194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19560276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1268194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023788135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018478326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25216246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972200600","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW - COMPTE RENDU - INSIDE AND OUTSIDE CANADIAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF DAVID MULLAN","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.056731998102242595,"score_gpt":0.35143427343593686,"score_spread":0.29470227533369425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972200600","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032615566,0.44841817,0.00036663917,0.26099992,0.08802106,0.00009373103,0.0012312297,0.00012520692,0.20041795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010335487,0.31239817,0.00071114267,0.13857186,0.043388147,0.00018092067,0.0009979486,0.00026086724,0.49315548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956593,0.0003104613,0.00012148046,0.00026435038,0.0031840908,0.0004602678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98656076,0.0020222098,0.00030773695,0.00026783987,0.010107029,0.0007343493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003200925,0.0010471357,0.001549523,0.009301252,0.005791051,0.008825288,0.0029991544,0.0067998143,0.03469987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012987539,0.0007543406,0.0007058709,0.015527216,0.003880482,0.0033359209,0.0015158412,0.0049801613,0.009573572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013146832,0.0000012744777,0.000013327357,0.00006391296,0.0000015438338,0.000004366059,0.000022057016,0.000012858457,0.0000074163413,0.0020830901,0.9938764,0.0039124694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018705015,0.000001128747,0.00020807853,0.00025970236,0.000004905458,0.000008344369,0.000051237377,0.000008830759,0.000009328368,0.0006465708,0.99879384,0.0000061220994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.801548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9352576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.198452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05145625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066218846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3992414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972206043","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3432330","title":"Loser Takes All: Multiple Claimants &amp;amp; Probabilistic Restitution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Probabilistic logic; Unjust enrichment; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.03329714907493829,"score_gpt":0.3206020554070611,"score_spread":0.2873049063321228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972206043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0848841,0.00474492,0.2511179,0.101921245,0.001338416,0.00034660177,0.0019799569,0.0014634791,0.55220336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88202524,0.001141095,0.007908684,0.003191817,0.0012141003,0.00022784059,0.00018742835,0.00025071716,0.10385303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905867,0.0037925849,0.00033676246,0.0015391811,0.0023205418,0.001424284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629677,0.026973683,0.0036811684,0.0031683426,0.002229609,0.000979488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011843004,0.0008520436,0.00187036,0.002186269,0.006105587,0.009367693,0.004984639,0.01283752,0.07158147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050037164,0.001192718,0.0014353415,0.002619802,0.006905391,0.011433581,0.0067627844,0.010829803,0.0062661893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043904452,0.00006427046,0.00089226395,0.000051247185,0.000027216238,0.0002684784,0.00028360134,0.003080997,0.000048906466,0.96678054,0.019144079,0.009314302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003343097,0.000024135059,0.0009092903,0.000052797222,0.000049574854,0.00029102544,0.0003369187,0.02012123,0.00016755417,0.9629246,0.015046096,0.000043408443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00944772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009082192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07158147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004317688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045553674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23946387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975404603","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v35i1.5632","title":"\"Vexatious and an Abuse of the Process of the Court\": The Assets Company v Mere Roihi Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Certainty; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020904804518232796,"score_gpt":0.2892961959220668,"score_spread":0.268391391403834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975404603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16364345,0.008080686,0.0045737326,0.25982428,0.00090362085,0.00007993823,0.000060012797,0.000038974504,0.56279534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921943,0.0013950645,0.00069975597,0.042538453,0.00048489816,0.000066646455,0.000012112533,0.000018004885,0.032842115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99295795,0.0035967212,0.00021575388,0.0006302451,0.0012768855,0.0013225051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932689,0.005027831,0.0005937675,0.0002904206,0.0004979205,0.0003211271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007872084,0.00019026377,0.0003510838,0.00088385143,0.0129898805,0.008705329,0.0011871272,0.012365713,0.0015917487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015750121,0.00046519822,0.0003950892,0.0007856307,0.023973139,0.0048590796,0.0040224306,0.0136388615,0.00024329293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011377555,0.0000071951063,0.00045006338,0.000016337915,0.0000037391924,0.00069663185,0.012754915,0.000052276395,0.00015757376,0.97014815,0.012849977,0.0028518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008785853,0.00009528871,0.008820939,0.0010040695,0.000079152764,0.002369796,0.032555718,0.0013645925,0.0023238158,0.33162177,0.6195071,0.00016987388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06153313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10961795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06153313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00784833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068345405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12234992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976602630","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198747963.003.0002","title":"2. Some Advice for the Novice Tort Lawyer","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Damages; Law; Criticism; Liability; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0343875519503604,"score_gpt":0.2579262848627683,"score_spread":0.22353873291240792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976602630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011689486,0.017025176,0.0078791585,0.5557598,0.013080946,0.000104330735,0.00017538051,0.00068200496,0.40412426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012284726,0.01204319,0.019878734,0.18179736,0.004736559,0.00016176498,0.00018759967,0.0003690238,0.768541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986313,0.0005435548,0.0000867069,0.00014033818,0.0004361434,0.00016195631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981079,0.00077191327,0.00006725524,0.000090846945,0.00071135384,0.00025073765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027686793,0.00076286076,0.0004497512,0.0009824327,0.004911156,0.0046261423,0.0015196695,0.009875812,0.059021097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068262755,0.00042820253,0.0006224171,0.0005519039,0.0023002296,0.008813816,0.0021825056,0.0077113425,0.040794056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008812798,0.000043911255,0.00017109353,0.00008453895,0.0000010868678,0.00034903528,0.0010928563,0.000083393395,0.00014919798,0.039258767,0.9187494,0.040007945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004746835,0.0000151747,0.00023101491,0.00021460303,8.797527e-7,0.0003565963,0.001580646,0.00009490033,0.00004992771,0.0175198,0.97992116,0.000010472375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005456725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02228183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059021097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017947637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022974582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19744527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976991538","doi":"10.5539/ass.v15n10p141","title":"Theoretical Research on the Principle of Equality in Civil Law from the Perspective of Civil Society","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Assertion; Interpretation (philosophy); Contradiction; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Mathematics; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07564707056488372,"score_gpt":0.43063679981141734,"score_spread":0.3549897292465336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976991538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018002886,0.019975556,0.1280152,0.057280313,0.0011696432,0.000091703754,0.00010740065,0.00005408288,0.77530324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90134346,0.015737105,0.02910391,0.01025927,0.0026484337,0.00029776472,0.00015223135,0.00011392407,0.04034391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893205,0.0055147423,0.00030336695,0.0012249006,0.0026248503,0.0010116061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99051064,0.0071923616,0.00066331023,0.00053309,0.0008069433,0.00029359106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076434757,0.00074515294,0.00079287903,0.0031469334,0.0063973893,0.007932251,0.0019763063,0.0050270306,0.009212528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009279058,0.00052224845,0.001069279,0.0036625615,0.05026745,0.015037889,0.0044709365,0.008192682,0.0015921209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.473398e-7,0.0000020860093,0.000019109257,0.000008832858,6.23413e-7,0.000006315871,0.00032542527,0.000061160004,0.000007563644,0.9987074,0.00022159296,0.00063921465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003943842,0.0000065757563,0.00010025536,0.0000646256,0.0000021062767,0.000027756929,0.00038601068,0.0003145082,0.000047658115,0.9744479,0.024593448,0.000005086936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005947248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033676303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009212528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009154813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005488822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06642312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977012254","doi":"10.25167/osap.1279","title":"Rediscovering Blackstone: wpływ Williama Blackstone’a na rozwój amerykańskiej nauki prawa w recepcji Alberta W. Alschulera","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Opole Studies in Administration and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sovereignty; Common law; State (computer science); Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.0797856984515944,"score_gpt":0.4311742898990793,"score_spread":0.3513885914474849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977012254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045141473,0.1330345,0.002931025,0.3912613,0.016794924,0.000036275673,0.00007938698,0.00007360442,0.41064748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39773604,0.039262973,0.0015645379,0.055179827,0.004275914,0.000054176628,0.000043382075,0.00021139378,0.5016717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908197,0.00034713605,0.000022564944,0.00015880079,0.00024764985,0.00014194942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992656,0.00031561483,0.00007258068,0.000043312306,0.00020620979,0.00009666489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011194423,0.00027936485,0.00022267862,0.0007368483,0.005979902,0.004410264,0.00033421008,0.0023616955,0.006442038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003086226,0.00020620963,0.0001311188,0.0006621586,0.005345994,0.0039888136,0.0021163055,0.004455969,0.0013740918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003852027,0.000032169486,0.00091424416,0.00008904756,0.00000690421,0.00045940315,0.037879888,0.000042633907,0.00064231746,0.50248444,0.40946475,0.047945715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014557293,0.000003213951,0.00047707086,0.000067268506,0.0000011269726,0.00008274641,0.0020280222,0.000015611358,0.00013910391,0.0072194557,0.98995787,0.000006985215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023347938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048693012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023347938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030714923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002140452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04642409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977097792","doi":"","title":"Legal unreasonableness: Life after 'Li'","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIAL Forum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Rationality; Political science; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Citizenship; Immigration; Administrative law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03318271763834884,"score_gpt":0.316296108130545,"score_spread":0.28311339049219614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977097792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014673688,0.014733165,0.0057843514,0.6838935,0.004394086,0.00004970986,0.000140089,0.00005264306,0.2762788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5244118,0.002690532,0.0018679351,0.39238608,0.0019796886,0.00009084158,0.00010632627,0.00006859346,0.07639814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891684,0.004448015,0.00048485564,0.0014622549,0.002294371,0.0021421183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921983,0.0046097976,0.000453855,0.00049634115,0.0016678132,0.0005739147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014040901,0.0003957902,0.00075215707,0.00089588197,0.015276701,0.012343975,0.002821483,0.029165752,0.005226424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023194721,0.00042261925,0.00080028566,0.00074960716,0.037261385,0.012218591,0.0062601473,0.026871078,0.0008714114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010638344,0.000008619072,0.00020667397,0.000022298618,0.0000038557982,0.0004172761,0.011738921,0.000023994762,0.00007120391,0.95802206,0.02522355,0.0042508617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018927458,0.00004153339,0.0006315866,0.00037797185,0.000016832875,0.00045549235,0.01501932,0.000113582304,0.00035502683,0.5254376,0.4574597,0.000072429575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07709283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114472836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07709283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015310221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013367124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15328819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978097176","doi":"","title":"One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Unjust Enrichment In The Supreme Court Of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Law; Political science; Restitution","score_opus":0.08300298807878627,"score_gpt":0.3241017000889317,"score_spread":0.24109871201014543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978097176","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10646047,0.008775645,0.003669995,0.45568982,0.0013098806,0.00013016202,0.0003044785,0.00009138586,0.42356822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8809704,0.001430801,0.0013078075,0.0465503,0.00027848638,0.000056527617,0.00006259968,0.00007312936,0.06926991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850472,0.0019190504,0.0002375842,0.0013141646,0.0039959745,0.0074860216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922369,0.0020011608,0.00025663475,0.00030770598,0.0026367162,0.0025609361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006093111,0.0004430058,0.001134168,0.0015345862,0.04859218,0.020855851,0.003365891,0.016892806,0.0076003033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019989645,0.0006524809,0.00069543,0.0025334852,0.031464398,0.0057356227,0.006973038,0.021436032,0.0005186551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000496908,0.000031322445,0.002715974,0.000053867447,0.000040367602,0.0003716957,0.010572934,0.00075786654,0.00020153333,0.90092975,0.07119447,0.013080482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012269581,0.00003758878,0.012421921,0.00047922545,0.00014497469,0.00016191351,0.032786243,0.002362482,0.00086896843,0.5259086,0.42442453,0.000280833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99453825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14271179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14271179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3086876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978927328","doi":"10.29173/alr2565","title":"The Devil is in the Scale: Revisiting the Commonality Requirement in Charter Class Actions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Charter; Normative; Law and economics; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Complementarity (molecular biology); Class (philosophy); Redress; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06221157356095968,"score_gpt":0.3734815764382308,"score_spread":0.31127000287727113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978927328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18536684,0.0032158538,0.1736026,0.10747517,0.00085560454,0.00042468705,0.00012401673,0.00026609967,0.52866906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96546715,0.00054469326,0.016531164,0.006112134,0.00025042595,0.00030354384,0.000029440194,0.00007903024,0.010682487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9633283,0.017588094,0.0012912994,0.0051660035,0.009596092,0.0030301975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95505714,0.027606836,0.003274085,0.008467629,0.004420165,0.0011741706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028733602,0.00051390135,0.00091550214,0.0027574755,0.010525073,0.013880772,0.0039075078,0.009032807,0.0029835308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06205448,0.000632117,0.0012055604,0.0015068091,0.071955696,0.018905085,0.014874008,0.014656361,0.00046700786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003364163,0.000005620711,0.00016598604,0.0000075461007,0.0000019681463,0.000056524503,0.0024287852,0.00019239612,0.00004180128,0.9946792,0.00046366028,0.0019530996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001369927,0.000037602196,0.0008343919,0.00014891797,0.000013395487,0.00008213215,0.0039564767,0.0011232079,0.00031521995,0.96111655,0.032325696,0.00003278915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014904102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013486542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028733602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011195501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012946252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1519596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979164139","doi":"","title":"Right-to-Farm Legislation in Canada: Exceptional Protection for Standard Farm Practices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Legislature; Business; Legitimacy; Liability; Political science; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.027549898197143943,"score_gpt":0.32496860151908497,"score_spread":0.29741870332194104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979164139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.444704,0.006437601,0.006145559,0.1242992,0.0005871881,0.00026308128,0.00081409095,0.0002179282,0.41653144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92724836,0.0019796176,0.0035004078,0.0132636605,0.00004775933,0.000033366006,0.00017461977,0.000035560533,0.053716753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903121,0.00067013287,0.00026814445,0.00091632607,0.004367874,0.0034654234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832676,0.0038512135,0.001179935,0.000637629,0.0073000584,0.0037636226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004460765,0.00019845327,0.00037385797,0.0017130508,0.020971151,0.008927798,0.0019070621,0.0027484465,0.0035653978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013407185,0.0005312795,0.00039712279,0.0025947294,0.009927795,0.0021925129,0.0025366081,0.0049957833,0.00017258867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008796556,0.00013353185,0.062315214,0.0003282605,0.000043305576,0.0021047788,0.054606497,0.0017684741,0.0028955329,0.70582503,0.05655432,0.11333702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005060098,0.000092434864,0.22747888,0.0006376999,0.00006192103,0.0004109507,0.028426154,0.0031830296,0.0019513478,0.026329663,0.7111209,0.00025643193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99736804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99914527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21877657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21877657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36641032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90610844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979357697","doi":"","title":"Professor Mary Condon appointed Dean of Osgoode Hall Law School for a four-year term commencing July 1","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Law; Political science; History; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.04092394794608251,"score_gpt":0.32998182646082397,"score_spread":0.28905787851474146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979357697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056170337,0.01282689,0.0021117176,0.47522447,0.15810937,0.0007974134,0.0012933094,0.0013516513,0.34266815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004478913,0.0010979822,0.0004750857,0.015772881,0.004164479,0.00012206895,0.00021425894,0.00017513709,0.9734991],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962591,0.00042379397,0.00018162881,0.000690302,0.0015337645,0.000911501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893897,0.00030560323,0.000265118,0.0002143558,0.002535011,0.0072901514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003798243,0.00074856955,0.0009272688,0.001164052,0.0110134315,0.006856501,0.0015375869,0.0054407227,0.20881121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006447183,0.000863039,0.00049018575,0.0005584179,0.0024261489,0.0032041993,0.0052427347,0.009225321,0.09536681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006800794,0.000017044025,0.00016061457,0.000014211143,7.0775053e-7,0.00007312198,0.0000853851,0.0000060854577,0.000109052875,0.0013438696,0.9932875,0.0048957127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042940433,0.000018127022,0.00047761557,0.00003924016,9.942829e-7,0.000048856316,0.00038119653,0.000019643023,0.000085769956,0.00018278649,0.9987337,0.000007657449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025539076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11164418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20881121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080480855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018470213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6985431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979538973","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2019.67.3.fazel","title":"Suing the Canada Revenue Agency in Tort","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; Audit; Agency (philosophy); Law; Parliament; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.012001390883941039,"score_gpt":0.21664451106592375,"score_spread":0.20464312018198272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979538973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07182501,0.0043801363,0.0040505,0.24730077,0.0012431901,0.0002030759,0.0004898888,0.0001988763,0.67030853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8150336,0.0031324278,0.0035789348,0.039784864,0.00026052856,0.000037547085,0.00013906255,0.000059204365,0.1379739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915035,0.00086893723,0.00025414093,0.0007029738,0.0035393692,0.003131126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935049,0.001710269,0.00037693453,0.00035401635,0.003020702,0.0010331569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033726706,0.0004064896,0.0005442859,0.0015429637,0.021873144,0.009859003,0.001918854,0.0075162454,0.0063794944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014182089,0.000442447,0.00050899177,0.0018603586,0.012486723,0.002165866,0.0024371175,0.006789835,0.00062309246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014167171,0.000024630417,0.0066866884,0.000049670798,0.000014726441,0.0007576497,0.0049480502,0.000367432,0.00027186444,0.85722524,0.113439426,0.016200539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003109452,0.000037065936,0.013982471,0.0003048282,0.00008590567,0.000762185,0.010455637,0.0017407591,0.0009808616,0.03755062,0.9338964,0.00017220085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9813906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99130225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059250098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059250098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19054054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4298916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980150858","doi":"","title":"The Good Faith Challenge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Fair dealing; Nothing; Rhetoric; Commonwealth; Political science; Form of the Good; Caveat emptor; Sociology; Law and economics; Good faith; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.009450958780894417,"score_gpt":0.2777368638650274,"score_spread":0.26828590508413297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980150858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06363387,0.0021846022,0.02023985,0.32263777,0.00068784214,0.00009193125,0.000053923635,0.000038753344,0.5904314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95146936,0.00042426577,0.0020392458,0.020758389,0.0002057203,0.000051636143,0.000012702926,0.000024858173,0.025013786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984423,0.0074595986,0.00024925228,0.0014627604,0.0043773158,0.0020279812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98453695,0.008724693,0.0007743309,0.0016929741,0.00265231,0.0016186223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013269486,0.0002877325,0.00043450974,0.00069534074,0.01215037,0.011653264,0.0014973647,0.008404282,0.005482037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027363345,0.00021334211,0.00042977714,0.0006669082,0.05153241,0.006981023,0.006123974,0.010559463,0.00063532265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004512941,0.000005088773,0.00012958619,0.000005139873,0.0000014484741,0.000029386201,0.0018358339,0.0000518843,0.00003864501,0.99339664,0.0025901622,0.0019116197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018612182,0.00003165432,0.0005456138,0.00013968632,0.000009610031,0.00010139965,0.008114901,0.00080140674,0.00035111443,0.8510742,0.1387889,0.000022942399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058320105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041071907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058320105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0155920265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021212406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11596131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985602801","doi":"10.29173/jaed333","title":"Property, Information And Institutional Design","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Private property; Political science; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.019020082287431687,"score_gpt":0.27803120117371444,"score_spread":0.25901111888628275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985602801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031611636,0.018561143,0.25535095,0.07259487,0.00077233627,0.00034188345,0.0005184488,0.00044186463,0.6198069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89292973,0.0078534875,0.05350737,0.0033487414,0.00052215694,0.0007126082,0.00033636825,0.0001240171,0.04066553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922236,0.005012902,0.0003409297,0.0011509417,0.0006627221,0.00060888124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99221545,0.0044919313,0.0007952675,0.0014565723,0.0005773373,0.0004633621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00752437,0.0005403573,0.00071989035,0.0017904728,0.0037757093,0.012461807,0.0018560358,0.0038582308,0.009731495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007954925,0.00038273496,0.0006763451,0.0023574177,0.033060633,0.008950192,0.0035097317,0.0025984182,0.001051694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002986089,0.0000036927715,0.00010826734,0.000019914161,0.0000030594363,0.000016573274,0.00030504313,0.00037904532,0.000019655667,0.9951871,0.0007570232,0.0031976232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006017817,0.0000088581555,0.00014972578,0.000042332904,0.000003877381,0.000032526896,0.0003235107,0.0008139759,0.00005544146,0.9665255,0.03203258,0.000005612824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056121065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034382343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012461807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080046905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004569965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05807841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989376111","doi":"","title":"Dunsmuir and Jurisdiction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Deference; Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Standard of review; Judicial review; Key (lock); Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.009958624161173116,"score_gpt":0.2975966712047965,"score_spread":0.2876380470436234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989376111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02964362,0.016571453,0.0058951504,0.10458566,0.0012512545,0.00004862553,0.00013632803,0.000068935784,0.8417989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8724595,0.0030186244,0.002640461,0.019985212,0.00032214398,0.000043138905,0.000045827328,0.00005889948,0.101426296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907135,0.0025896928,0.00021832484,0.0012403341,0.002499489,0.0027385573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699724,0.0011768234,0.00017864462,0.0002658314,0.0010429261,0.0003385601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053518945,0.00026215258,0.00044569335,0.0017337481,0.017401459,0.00980371,0.0018614021,0.0038748754,0.01042363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009765493,0.00030449426,0.00044239324,0.001517507,0.028978618,0.0034232752,0.0057196827,0.005737252,0.0006221745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043738323,0.0000018351872,0.00024429488,0.000010876335,0.0000019111849,0.00005544987,0.0021393565,0.00004626519,0.000039945742,0.9868413,0.0072276895,0.0033867022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022451108,0.000019668485,0.0027579488,0.00032098035,0.000020884308,0.0001390161,0.0068838703,0.00038435997,0.0003580402,0.3186652,0.6703751,0.000052452295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7148338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7680449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7148338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041248746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044832136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5736912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989922706","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19890443","title":"Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Collateral; Legislature; Law; Statutory law; Legislative intent; Political science; Law and economics; Entitlement (fair division); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06463917718911977,"score_gpt":0.39831135338932117,"score_spread":0.3336721762002014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989922706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0516658,0.012002774,0.063811585,0.31551176,0.004580575,0.00023661675,0.00015391727,0.00024498536,0.551792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91406417,0.0032059918,0.012959742,0.029682942,0.0048216856,0.00026288503,0.000057133882,0.00021782795,0.034727704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93647355,0.033003278,0.0028746508,0.004815275,0.0186589,0.004174399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90192825,0.0677193,0.0040041963,0.009207746,0.015160505,0.0019800519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06401256,0.00057041575,0.0014921998,0.0037896372,0.0086279465,0.022863789,0.0049817283,0.023897877,0.00719121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095682144,0.0008231029,0.0013309543,0.0019093333,0.04166842,0.024490045,0.009659276,0.02394124,0.0020327477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011351783,0.000009319519,0.00012648554,0.000025730644,0.00000442796,0.0001811345,0.0012388949,0.00016820288,0.00010826199,0.9917576,0.0038297658,0.0025388917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031057712,0.00007311818,0.0005711094,0.00068579806,0.00004104007,0.00027175198,0.0016109135,0.0022922265,0.0009645421,0.8596437,0.13373245,0.000082257364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009404047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0147117125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06401256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015517424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017376699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33853483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990169632","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttz091","title":"Comparing the institutional constructive trust with the remedial constructive trust","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Remedial education; Constructive; State (computer science); Supreme court; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Sociology; High Court; Computer science","score_opus":0.020610184791982206,"score_gpt":0.2680394680347634,"score_spread":0.2474292832427812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990169632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32849482,0.003309285,0.02127177,0.01799696,0.0007913531,0.00019694628,0.000349997,0.000056314504,0.6275326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997279,0.0001749079,0.00041776017,0.00034772448,0.00004087605,0.00003007189,0.000033101987,0.000010688914,0.0016659336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9524237,0.024506083,0.0025475381,0.0019549683,0.013316892,0.005250836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88097113,0.059420932,0.021887826,0.0075792316,0.023042874,0.007097985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019455293,0.00026347084,0.00053215015,0.0044968105,0.004514419,0.0148569895,0.0016224795,0.0029231303,0.009575657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11472666,0.00020106531,0.00078815996,0.0050768596,0.03365574,0.016699152,0.011493843,0.004547165,0.00080237596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010482624,0.000041933952,0.010671114,0.00015066488,0.00003916249,0.00018155515,0.010091554,0.00043376815,0.000065782144,0.96626306,0.002524771,0.009431852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100446196,0.000632639,0.098312594,0.0018554366,0.00030013543,0.000918294,0.12270277,0.0058768154,0.001019586,0.6513442,0.116658516,0.00027861266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021718675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020043539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021718675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017891286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008584889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12981099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990653933","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.14","title":"Civil and Common Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Perspective (graphical); Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Public law; Commercial law; Common law; Order (exchange); Comparative law; Conflict of laws; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.052766210166897885,"score_gpt":0.332534001411051,"score_spread":0.27976779124415313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990653933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005979537,0.035461143,0.0062198583,0.056156617,0.0009337785,0.000027827404,0.000094226736,0.00006335925,0.89506364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6985334,0.036986884,0.0076869302,0.025799347,0.005136194,0.00018364872,0.00024722185,0.00014844454,0.22527796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577856,0.0018954065,0.00011484381,0.00054465135,0.0011255011,0.0005410771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972765,0.0014400394,0.00022362942,0.00040407066,0.00039820356,0.00025762306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030843446,0.00048453166,0.00049728743,0.0022142122,0.007219621,0.00860529,0.00083912443,0.004089584,0.018020703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00553763,0.00021920889,0.0004053946,0.0026460688,0.028919224,0.007622238,0.0040721754,0.0046613,0.0028505696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.334609e-7,0.000001754304,0.000025655185,0.00000755861,5.8683923e-7,0.000007581561,0.00031776854,0.000023055218,0.0000054604025,0.9939214,0.0035957298,0.002092835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024602432,0.000006043595,0.0002035426,0.000111009824,0.0000017272275,0.000049568986,0.0009370136,0.00008663522,0.000026831607,0.7177486,0.28082183,0.000004804608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014571585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012401065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018020703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009534281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007654888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069176376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991662242","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.007","title":"Remedies for violations of Indigenous peoples’ human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Indigenous rights; Reservation of rights; Law; Indigenous; Fundamental rights; Jurisprudence; Right to property; International law; Rights of Nature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013313868627646528,"score_gpt":0.2696257006686968,"score_spread":0.25631183204105024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991662242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048896752,0.018265406,0.018534377,0.091406785,0.0028669965,0.0009298965,0.00037380078,0.0008972258,0.81782883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69946945,0.016944671,0.03006217,0.04809556,0.0007566175,0.0003996877,0.00038903585,0.00022288419,0.20365983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728095,0.0022291685,0.0015531038,0.0015924945,0.015395925,0.006419761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98816633,0.0030735522,0.0008468741,0.0012388229,0.005695706,0.0009788296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009168886,0.00080318766,0.00063283526,0.003794369,0.016377112,0.007317207,0.0043927245,0.0089921905,0.0076253987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021724125,0.0007008013,0.0012014351,0.0018156783,0.019096278,0.0023057098,0.006324764,0.011408907,0.0008329727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001634557,0.000090630536,0.003155254,0.0004705581,0.00005540709,0.0015198436,0.029282875,0.0009735101,0.0033188302,0.8185267,0.06578484,0.07680511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003906426,0.00008842493,0.01298786,0.0017243251,0.00017223078,0.00090704294,0.017332535,0.0008201107,0.0036816346,0.053428717,0.90853304,0.0002849072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8861044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92851174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113895595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041418936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12564202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30051684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993216637","doi":"","title":"Ownership defined differently in civil, canon law.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Canon; Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04555882821101389,"score_gpt":0.2737149462309448,"score_spread":0.22815611801993088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993216637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036839224,0.010273444,0.022260586,0.032286156,0.0010319137,0.00008341094,0.0006113301,0.00007338756,0.89654064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8644084,0.0047590337,0.004756304,0.0076829144,0.00077952776,0.00019850724,0.00030828128,0.000050440874,0.11705658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622667,0.0012514913,0.00029432634,0.00052123796,0.0010966776,0.00060974725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487287,0.0031149723,0.00041359878,0.000543753,0.00084991305,0.00020501822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003191656,0.00027894857,0.0005206391,0.0020671682,0.0033002286,0.00890031,0.00092461193,0.0045710388,0.014023867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012024208,0.00029653782,0.00041290303,0.002859415,0.009606467,0.011038602,0.0028878602,0.0030203664,0.0013830516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024100132,0.000002157028,0.0001316287,0.000007762779,0.0000013715298,0.00001001267,0.00023585293,0.000017377846,0.000013638156,0.9958929,0.0018605717,0.0018243832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011316888,0.000014373471,0.0012029224,0.00014208976,0.000016593061,0.00010365415,0.0009530299,0.00028360842,0.00023621685,0.916243,0.08077851,0.000014533917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011579753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014486162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014023867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035913407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004894943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046914518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995168884","doi":"","title":"New Wine in Old Bottles: Corrupt Contracts in Canadian Private Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Political science; Criminal law; Jurisdiction; Language change; Private law; Conviction; Common law; Damages; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Comparative law; Legislation; Conflict of laws; Liability","score_opus":0.020152140986178475,"score_gpt":0.29844053848218194,"score_spread":0.2782883974960035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995168884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040612895,0.032427695,0.0041442686,0.071829714,0.0007229435,0.00008569926,0.00071212166,0.00007796475,0.84938675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7051339,0.040700156,0.004462622,0.0127879875,0.00041294517,0.000050677983,0.00047808545,0.00012187756,0.23585168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997684,0.00024041004,0.000031981144,0.00017336295,0.0011735073,0.00069669285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985441,0.0004428648,0.00010580313,0.00007577585,0.0005742224,0.00025719023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001017439,0.00034443956,0.00027981531,0.002061937,0.014252213,0.010549384,0.0009981594,0.0026837143,0.009275836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034451364,0.0003199092,0.0002975281,0.0056398837,0.010785794,0.0028706056,0.001463475,0.003076282,0.00070951047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008861153,0.000007874391,0.0009651517,0.000050163373,0.0000030001734,0.00013811323,0.008138554,0.0004804074,0.00007830138,0.91482514,0.058801822,0.016502678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068845384,0.000008272595,0.007208591,0.0003092042,0.000012916146,0.00016478846,0.009691037,0.0010500503,0.00014303409,0.065740325,0.9156166,0.000048369704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98616076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99206454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1101608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1101608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10403632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7992763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995463940","doi":"10.1002/iir.1355","title":"The origins and development of the office of registrar in bankruptcy of the High Court","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Jurisdiction; Law; Creditor; Work (physics); Officer; Business; Political science; Finance; Debt; Engineering","score_opus":0.030677726483000146,"score_gpt":0.3332561482040271,"score_spread":0.30257842172102695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995463940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19797271,0.039345056,0.0054667364,0.025225764,0.0011404903,0.00015230651,0.00012826618,0.000057290163,0.73051137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098483,0.0047933697,0.00081157737,0.0026555257,0.00034136276,0.00002827934,0.000025658012,0.000034358847,0.081461675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358714,0.0028066877,0.00028472458,0.00080610096,0.0011557714,0.001359534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988369,0.0059688496,0.0010762787,0.00050103694,0.0030091216,0.0010757594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074566468,0.0001483853,0.00029017965,0.0025022714,0.0046270466,0.011818186,0.000736934,0.0023662825,0.004061827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011117195,0.0008553752,0.00016842809,0.0016868213,0.015662413,0.0023783613,0.0036896367,0.0040192776,0.00095084275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046917754,0.00003693971,0.002737606,0.00014243816,0.0000054034017,0.00081291166,0.026556473,0.00029299586,0.0005269632,0.916201,0.010318629,0.04232176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022945205,0.00018070776,0.034273848,0.0012260351,0.000017043934,0.00051664957,0.009055596,0.0004571237,0.0012401975,0.023618026,0.92929703,0.00009491813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08821468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13395666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08821468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014000863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015594683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17540246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995607031","doi":"10.1561/109.00000023","title":"Do Corporate Fiduciary Duties Matter?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Corporate Governance","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.11840524044959469,"score_gpt":0.331441662935097,"score_spread":0.21303642248550234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995607031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12059355,0.035471886,0.0033751952,0.24877943,0.0013762204,0.00010178792,0.00049644697,0.00004097438,0.5897645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91273314,0.00852168,0.00034485623,0.0570919,0.0014751022,0.000059849124,0.00015677279,0.000044929824,0.019571878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828635,0.0045978273,0.00050290267,0.002382808,0.0056851497,0.003967879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95067585,0.032656204,0.0061063026,0.0023701978,0.0062883184,0.0019031164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016795205,0.0004519426,0.0012166667,0.002645885,0.007036296,0.015638305,0.002142826,0.009999451,0.019590423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052389093,0.00035162712,0.000966885,0.0036789703,0.025183514,0.016436685,0.0035554592,0.009661927,0.0021671888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050326038,0.00006801507,0.0086613,0.00011593632,0.000040151437,0.000106682164,0.0027024406,0.00022185418,0.000082768136,0.94634956,0.018638618,0.022962248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010868522,0.00013748431,0.05412729,0.0011149689,0.0001891338,0.0001940486,0.011556459,0.0006663615,0.00071887916,0.5908911,0.34019276,0.00010279762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049788084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054090098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049788084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014376504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011422376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10430932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995886345","doi":"10.29173/alr2600","title":"Sealed and Delivered: A Theory of Unilateral Transfer at Common Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Law; Common law; Transfer (computing); Seal (emblem); Reading (process); Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.03760485368143334,"score_gpt":0.3021664233771204,"score_spread":0.26456156969568706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995886345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01375398,0.0037643071,0.25030327,0.040793285,0.0004995514,0.00015797395,0.00016588194,0.00013612323,0.6904256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88604623,0.0031529376,0.030406404,0.007033857,0.0008028092,0.00039451884,0.00008335818,0.000129444,0.07195035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921186,0.0027934976,0.00024520952,0.0012249058,0.0023835902,0.0012342334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957177,0.0023176374,0.00041226813,0.0007285523,0.000570534,0.0002532934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008136107,0.0006528613,0.0008920612,0.002508319,0.0061058267,0.010958016,0.0034665223,0.010589152,0.01368532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010552361,0.00073696213,0.0019518611,0.0024223675,0.04570208,0.020698668,0.005410224,0.009100491,0.0016609296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.947797e-7,0.0000010891963,0.0000066692287,0.0000026805715,6.1051543e-7,0.000005314729,0.00008107246,0.00006265427,0.000004667471,0.99934095,0.00020601971,0.00028765085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004999845,0.0000031686466,0.00002757641,0.00001943814,0.0000029977234,0.00001529213,0.00006254097,0.0004363164,0.000026529082,0.9922849,0.0071118916,0.0000043595746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023117423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013107516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023117423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01705016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013445556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12370819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998950605","doi":"10.1515/jetl-2019-0121","title":"Simplifying the Complexities of Negligence Law – A Joint Academic/Judicial Proposal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Tort Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Causation; Res ipsa loquitur; Harm; Element (criminal law); Law; Duty; Meaning (existential); Duty of care; Tort; Contributory negligence; Liability; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13973243807535826,"score_gpt":0.34262262706459734,"score_spread":0.20289018898923908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998950605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03462652,0.0066449405,0.20935878,0.36747894,0.005195622,0.00047446878,0.00012884931,0.00026825364,0.3758236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8682427,0.004705444,0.0697704,0.019031238,0.005662746,0.00040994593,0.0000873418,0.000120290206,0.031969994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98328733,0.0077629676,0.0006880754,0.0010628224,0.005329051,0.00186983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751345,0.01526279,0.0011032498,0.0030167976,0.004202252,0.0012804172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024550695,0.0007233439,0.00077461917,0.004151082,0.007102344,0.013235602,0.0047362116,0.013502347,0.0072524264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030427197,0.00073790626,0.0017077992,0.0021519216,0.028725103,0.01335538,0.007908844,0.0118576065,0.0012319362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017125776,0.000010048381,0.000025811732,0.000008862127,0.0000011265547,0.0000313869,0.00019314211,0.0006161115,0.000018993196,0.99596244,0.0018138305,0.0013165867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020373798,0.000024130975,0.00012158716,0.00014248,0.000011889621,0.00007407784,0.0007511728,0.0070644566,0.00015005378,0.9406799,0.05092538,0.000034519773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028678672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022258105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028678672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017482385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021327803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12983799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999271827","doi":"","title":"Rights, Wrongs, and Injustices: The Structure of Remedial Law - Introductory Text","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Law; Political science; Common law; Substantive law; Private law; Sanctions; Public law; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.005244240665135988,"score_gpt":0.2524078314163625,"score_spread":0.24716359075122654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999271827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007053331,0.083072715,0.03983768,0.09639109,0.018564891,0.00037698014,0.0013615211,0.0003723269,0.75296944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2066114,0.077016056,0.030967126,0.050292417,0.026690273,0.001268626,0.0023237667,0.00074272044,0.60408765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992694,0.00027128911,0.000040919058,0.00012025415,0.0002196076,0.0000784491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984395,0.0011611478,0.00008753756,0.00006300742,0.00016915308,0.00007975107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001133278,0.000645052,0.00048072572,0.0011403718,0.0017320795,0.0046777115,0.0010905754,0.0030069877,0.019882362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002846674,0.00044912403,0.0003674508,0.0011565192,0.0058982135,0.0052002897,0.0016914965,0.006376648,0.004868066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013058684,0.000044588796,0.00017104209,0.0003098638,0.000003933947,0.00015011495,0.0025642777,0.0004150645,0.00025337975,0.7484216,0.2205288,0.027124157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065669324,0.000035228535,0.0007084294,0.0006808119,0.0000030956219,0.00020809499,0.00083677104,0.0003559546,0.0001601245,0.12581392,0.87117505,0.000015965721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028255323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035320576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019882362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035423115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023603847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06651306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999351544","doi":"","title":"Resolving the Status of the Bare Trust","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Express trust; Trust law; Assertion; Settlor; Commit; Blind trust; Voting trust; Law and economics; Function (biology); Agency (philosophy); Law; Business; Class (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.009721086446696083,"score_gpt":0.27584599492331513,"score_spread":0.26612490847661907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999351544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18427768,0.0032969436,0.1294729,0.20542315,0.003696487,0.000139359,0.00023950789,0.00017608063,0.47327787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748452,0.0004556755,0.005828979,0.0052857366,0.00050501566,0.00006109564,0.000031951728,0.00006122887,0.012925109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98543316,0.0058446308,0.0009097201,0.0027245588,0.0035332986,0.0015546647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98595744,0.0066165198,0.0014143916,0.0024968376,0.002573417,0.00094133336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015386631,0.00036754823,0.00080390467,0.0011772942,0.009488823,0.013165227,0.0018922951,0.00853408,0.004067993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041714683,0.00063080504,0.0006577452,0.0009812434,0.04657926,0.020548029,0.009379506,0.013179589,0.00061613653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041454496,0.0000022109484,0.000099591125,0.0000047879294,0.000001465761,0.000044136345,0.0014062002,0.000032488035,0.000036162717,0.99647576,0.0008628582,0.0010300867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010417487,0.000011082739,0.00020605109,0.00006489611,0.000008154585,0.00011499463,0.002007938,0.0005492398,0.00016341415,0.9689267,0.027916323,0.000020687283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012182226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008862701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015386631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009422264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008813112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081373215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W300055750","doi":"","title":"KVP: Riparian Resurrection in 20th Century Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Supreme court; Legislature; Property rights; Water quality; Law; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.015977644967049103,"score_gpt":0.2918316720079739,"score_spread":0.27585402704092477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W300055750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22622345,0.0035603677,0.0014074794,0.050350666,0.0003416185,0.00011534149,0.0005755674,0.000059548558,0.717366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6767868,0.0023358783,0.00062570063,0.010478104,0.00010396122,0.00006616311,0.00010745747,0.00004333583,0.3094526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984091,0.000097072094,0.000025775025,0.00017703458,0.00049905304,0.00079190056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888486,0.00018586563,0.00009972466,0.00006190598,0.00039229426,0.00037544064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081099337,0.00018468188,0.00016457292,0.0005659773,0.021096887,0.0033386853,0.000985835,0.003048041,0.006521161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017732751,0.00031232447,0.0002411654,0.0009275586,0.010926831,0.0013872433,0.002781495,0.002364965,0.0003649954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005964843,0.000034006756,0.010590714,0.00009788273,0.000015235517,0.0034801867,0.05559305,0.0005187387,0.0014383241,0.8426521,0.064070135,0.021450039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020681531,0.000021560547,0.022180356,0.00007613685,0.000015629175,0.00029130263,0.014244132,0.00025594936,0.0004199729,0.016509611,0.9459117,0.00005296891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99018234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99705505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11380047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11380047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.105002694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8256841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000879703","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/sjzdq","title":"Be careful what you promise: Proprietary estoppel in Cowper-Smith v Morgan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Supreme court; Appeal; Law and economics; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Law; Political science; Business; Economics; History","score_opus":0.03779937751724886,"score_gpt":0.3402926314269537,"score_spread":0.30249325390970483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000879703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09095508,0.00489984,0.0032240357,0.26171666,0.001524483,0.00015073437,0.00024169042,0.0000991174,0.6371884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6703255,0.0022134508,0.0010637338,0.18454368,0.00065817335,0.000090252564,0.00007717289,0.00007358434,0.14095433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947344,0.0008136383,0.00015515502,0.000580623,0.002060242,0.0016559942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760604,0.0011086306,0.00014473929,0.00011133598,0.00062132464,0.00040784632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037417677,0.00025096274,0.00029272074,0.0005302479,0.01240621,0.006323026,0.0016616557,0.01015812,0.0049452796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009895671,0.0006308949,0.00045976587,0.00074504816,0.007474526,0.003909628,0.0030996085,0.013354696,0.00038802467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002519058,0.000026795908,0.0020249793,0.00005440143,0.000014525398,0.0036108904,0.019739376,0.00019817782,0.00049718923,0.81524616,0.14628626,0.0122759845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042305135,0.00005704958,0.0065053264,0.00040370572,0.00006587227,0.0026022247,0.018568985,0.00068501977,0.0009798222,0.07620137,0.89371,0.00017825383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5602769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74144214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5602769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020222118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030535067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8846254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002608687","doi":"10.3968/11421","title":"Research on the Possibility of Civil Public Interests Protected by Individual Litigation in China: Based on the Path of Similarity of Interests","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Public interest; Action (physics); Class action; China; Law; Dual (grammatical number); Similarity (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Business; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.0817701611033452,"score_gpt":0.36532989246816017,"score_spread":0.28355973136481494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002608687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8687165,0.0015644359,0.00833266,0.0069507645,0.000047819125,0.00019059493,0.000103573686,0.000014218617,0.114079475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664104,0.00045626346,0.00058072124,0.00014684038,0.000020140638,0.000027760914,0.000022467306,0.0000015789666,0.002103202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526864,0.0014628947,0.0002336813,0.00074404874,0.0013001196,0.0009905127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315614,0.0035264893,0.0015010873,0.00030821588,0.0009963188,0.0005117599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004825291,0.00020880922,0.00039709403,0.0032015718,0.0036324833,0.004645674,0.0013085334,0.0015149812,0.0066844146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009517711,0.00025451407,0.0007751261,0.0027739054,0.005164729,0.0053351675,0.002657166,0.0017996468,0.0001712561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090705726,0.00016699494,0.108393535,0.00022266236,0.00008667236,0.0011682109,0.01147769,0.0016189078,0.0006197341,0.8376479,0.0015105603,0.036996454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016999389,0.0005355575,0.3626712,0.00054780685,0.0004864124,0.0016219846,0.04435702,0.036153533,0.0026193166,0.5143744,0.03631474,0.00014794107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025090067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029817991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025090067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111530395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008849392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08092135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004908272","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - GeneralPublic Trustee Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.07098042874741578,"score_gpt":0.30185857281449985,"score_spread":0.23087814406708407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004908272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012682299,0.0056021344,0.001361124,0.05104181,0.0051646754,0.0023380157,0.02201293,0.00044867216,0.8993484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022792632,0.0023068392,0.002728352,0.028844135,0.00029310273,0.0012139638,0.003617538,0.00018025654,0.93802327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97874624,0.0025048777,0.0028443232,0.0019526564,0.008777135,0.0051747947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97741234,0.0073094354,0.0012967916,0.0026324936,0.00984125,0.0015077078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011725279,0.0018608714,0.0017648829,0.006012321,0.013132656,0.016197763,0.0077710594,0.022546144,0.04391657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029450335,0.003700705,0.0018221064,0.00949867,0.0061267233,0.0053747166,0.0047431802,0.017230378,0.019170662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018686087,0.00015244231,0.003203475,0.00037817846,0.000052432097,0.0011195925,0.0040296004,0.0003548369,0.0010767755,0.2483408,0.73022205,0.0108829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012274292,0.000034256245,0.013241927,0.0007505701,0.000068079,0.00019564586,0.002168626,0.00015123894,0.00081189536,0.006142144,0.97611743,0.00019546536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89920723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9645738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100792766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07849136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17467567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56949735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004914957","doi":"","title":"The Decline of Revocation by Physical Act","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Law; Statute; Probate; Settlor; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0135644701985473,"score_gpt":0.3019006387724308,"score_spread":0.2883361685738835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004914957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103613995,0.017936224,0.045948964,0.16297325,0.0025453216,0.00016638485,0.00021551829,0.0008459439,0.6657544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83360535,0.0078092082,0.0065248655,0.049737267,0.0021417309,0.00016846853,0.00018984376,0.0004295044,0.09939384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96830565,0.01002429,0.002151677,0.0064094234,0.010872353,0.002236736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91238517,0.043446813,0.008703868,0.016316313,0.016852457,0.0022953516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021673596,0.00037746265,0.0006843644,0.001831968,0.004593299,0.013724031,0.00224309,0.0063004703,0.0075611444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07223402,0.00069926557,0.000960428,0.0014099926,0.022978285,0.02632423,0.005288097,0.016604004,0.0035694607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023707078,0.000034644916,0.0014152437,0.00006185668,0.0000052240944,0.00007871708,0.003205713,0.0001712958,0.000257168,0.94519365,0.009838389,0.03971441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024292429,0.00018471658,0.004223745,0.0005398212,0.000018058456,0.0007168232,0.0031247921,0.0012616703,0.0019044122,0.15374735,0.8341606,0.00009381008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009279017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047525265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021673596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010090472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010138175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114622295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005092090","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure: Setting aside default judgment - whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered - service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) - requirements for affadavit of service","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Aside; Law; Business; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.04035083230386558,"score_gpt":0.306273896790521,"score_spread":0.2659230644866554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005092090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057780057,0.0020698959,0.065477565,0.12308341,0.001623412,0.000920888,0.0007011608,0.0005298144,0.7478137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71660876,0.00069134287,0.03433065,0.08378084,0.00095934496,0.00085025193,0.0003163501,0.00015693155,0.16230553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95811707,0.013738305,0.0045176046,0.006062821,0.013109339,0.004454871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97876567,0.011663118,0.00097259134,0.0026528013,0.00506437,0.00088139315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027791964,0.00035424938,0.0005667806,0.00086931855,0.007932318,0.010713662,0.0024040237,0.016866557,0.005341477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05932855,0.0007347759,0.0007802151,0.00080861355,0.014184062,0.00551735,0.0036963634,0.013665915,0.0034711163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002185116,0.000037777965,0.0010050475,0.00003097137,0.0000059946738,0.00017965783,0.0039965007,0.000119138145,0.0005677245,0.94578105,0.038793713,0.00946052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012803932,0.0002836186,0.007851386,0.0006217367,0.000056016263,0.0008081336,0.005767864,0.0029105647,0.0032005894,0.48426148,0.49388006,0.00023050047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05824238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0755177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05824238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006009745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025641015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14697969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005329105","doi":"","title":"International Impact and Influence: Three Landmark Cases from the Canadian Law of Obligations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Common law; Precedent; Order (exchange); Political science; Comparative law; Landmark; International law; Philosophy of law; Business; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.04158349804114284,"score_gpt":0.3147964238316813,"score_spread":0.27321292579053846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005329105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12845229,0.006005872,0.0010986676,0.02838226,0.00036277602,0.00011726982,0.00031659286,0.00003412723,0.83523005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9424703,0.0043046265,0.00070401264,0.007833545,0.00020643041,0.0000856278,0.00020119724,0.000058780053,0.044135507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925781,0.00063354766,0.000110663976,0.00042218587,0.0035459634,0.0027096095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943879,0.0024265067,0.00037943054,0.00027768497,0.0016275594,0.00090083777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032739488,0.00056673744,0.00050204067,0.0042763343,0.034339584,0.011629699,0.0022879306,0.004621935,0.0035377466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013625123,0.00050602877,0.0005352359,0.008609824,0.019196875,0.0030850307,0.007146855,0.009668307,0.0002674897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047093672,0.000029042718,0.0048772967,0.0001044237,0.000020918786,0.0020355063,0.058986712,0.0005543416,0.0003175313,0.87183243,0.041093364,0.02010136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062271625,0.00003585968,0.043228284,0.000622425,0.00016026135,0.00084641884,0.078802615,0.0010678127,0.0013609463,0.051402252,0.8221228,0.00028808927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98036385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11545971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11545971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07338409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005824885","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0063","title":"Civil order, markets, and the intelligibility of the criminal law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Criminal law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil society; Modernity; Social order; Sociology; Political science; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.019536961946682915,"score_gpt":0.24530791825934686,"score_spread":0.22577095631266395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005824885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0755033,0.024785835,0.03373265,0.083060876,0.0005225269,0.00005520813,0.00009681763,0.00007307628,0.78216976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97822684,0.004855718,0.0028931983,0.0017287561,0.0002890983,0.000034799403,0.000023383367,0.000025700321,0.01192243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956487,0.0023853977,0.00016359176,0.00035038774,0.0010405027,0.00041140808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941934,0.004107429,0.00056761445,0.00041524787,0.0003793259,0.0003369407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004668219,0.0005270997,0.0005711771,0.00243021,0.0057714977,0.011148545,0.0009324192,0.0037339174,0.003737073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007250772,0.0003577854,0.00032940664,0.0019290476,0.09178016,0.0113120945,0.0054600383,0.0045797992,0.00027385794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.497468e-7,0.0000016308526,0.00003523416,0.0000069788957,4.773833e-7,0.000015614516,0.0010328487,0.0000842342,0.000009052489,0.9979259,0.00020153231,0.00068547524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036288357,0.0000038024718,0.00021856616,0.000057737412,0.0000012103948,0.00003325711,0.0017794834,0.00028840033,0.000042557716,0.9768092,0.020756533,0.0000055156634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026265599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022330772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026265599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01427745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009557327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10359067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010482745","doi":"","title":"Institut trustu v českém právu","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Déjà vu; Psychology","score_opus":0.009757716871764521,"score_gpt":0.2784274245160057,"score_spread":0.2686697076442412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010482745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021049703,0.06089917,0.012263774,0.019066965,0.004278435,0.00025632445,0.0037419414,0.0008294441,0.8776143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45714265,0.037923258,0.012328863,0.0020029973,0.0009963814,0.00044853138,0.0024611326,0.0008368984,0.48585933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573576,0.0007877777,0.0002767399,0.0009156587,0.0016822985,0.00060178555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998514,0.00041507726,0.00019344201,0.00021391791,0.00039143293,0.00027221174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030567585,0.0008940682,0.0011353764,0.0028634912,0.004198285,0.011264279,0.001199881,0.002179431,0.03935458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00639282,0.00048002973,0.0007097655,0.0035148838,0.003824522,0.0035038765,0.004289065,0.0062291715,0.016338067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001163215,0.000047434733,0.0010724831,0.000883897,0.00003091456,0.0004332176,0.0038881905,0.0009415673,0.0011289258,0.79851896,0.07339252,0.119545594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001580978,0.000017728653,0.0021207477,0.00034181465,0.000008541019,0.00030236552,0.0005257523,0.00019807993,0.00059061294,0.014057724,0.9817965,0.000024388853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034481075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022717895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03935458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011317136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01850345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1316542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010769090","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0142","title":"Criminalization, legal moralism, and abolition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Government (linguistics); Argumentative; Law; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Realm; Sociology; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02444520781592778,"score_gpt":0.2549425004430945,"score_spread":0.23049729262716673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010769090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028866505,0.10231454,0.0074158898,0.15105647,0.0023850016,0.00003818061,0.000048157042,0.00005828581,0.7078169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89568305,0.028367834,0.0016917454,0.014220058,0.0014508264,0.00008236188,0.00004584466,0.000040012746,0.058418255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601376,0.0019378889,0.0001069478,0.00034097314,0.0009193935,0.0006810225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799865,0.0010052788,0.00036279915,0.00018060271,0.00027151057,0.00018116836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026859767,0.00026776068,0.00041741267,0.0009394542,0.0037606554,0.005949205,0.0010356333,0.0030708236,0.0020095876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00490558,0.00023039618,0.00028638463,0.0013301502,0.060287047,0.0045113345,0.0029171435,0.0055718143,0.00033889106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016677033,0.000002667596,0.000060320257,0.000022107251,8.4899614e-7,0.000023325318,0.0009607134,0.0000433402,0.000010256677,0.99321645,0.0032820618,0.0023762085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007963474,0.000013095209,0.0012497302,0.00028945718,0.0000041323888,0.00015002319,0.002536279,0.00023860892,0.0000876163,0.8002398,0.19517197,0.000011322601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022376727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0192889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022376727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010076759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075552207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07311237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011087261","doi":"","title":"Fraud on a Power, Improper Purpose and Fiduciary Accountability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Opportunism; Compromise; Law and economics; Business; Power (physics); Function (biology); Law; Accounting; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.008289523043366257,"score_gpt":0.2868769427172159,"score_spread":0.27858741967384965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011087261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096090704,0.00602513,0.18915552,0.099062376,0.0016609649,0.00028019483,0.00019955837,0.00018009679,0.6073455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561896,0.0012895428,0.016261298,0.0075682187,0.001065816,0.00033213056,0.000037450343,0.000074129974,0.017181924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95886165,0.01644619,0.0026359465,0.0037603916,0.014440689,0.003855155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95391095,0.021918643,0.006253579,0.010603685,0.0054291016,0.0018840615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025424248,0.00046257622,0.0013345737,0.0032913492,0.0061355936,0.011830662,0.0024145963,0.0092562735,0.0027466842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05850109,0.0007604053,0.0015018735,0.002297691,0.060437102,0.012568203,0.010246237,0.011279605,0.00070780725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033126876,0.000004485136,0.00017997534,0.0000071131803,0.0000022736933,0.000021760872,0.000299257,0.00008907649,0.00002707748,0.9973556,0.00048242827,0.0015277155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018000736,0.00002591184,0.00061283744,0.00013159934,0.000010174316,0.00017945963,0.0002885066,0.00092943106,0.00020411646,0.9723965,0.025175247,0.00002817735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005648488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025840336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025424248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062809284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010058819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13445783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014248467","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2020.68.1.ptp","title":"Personal Tax Planning: Due Diligence Defence to Liability for Unpaid Statutory Remittances","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Due diligence; Business; Context (archaeology); Liability; Pension; Income tax; Appeal; Law; Economics; Finance; Law and economics; Public economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05704255070104716,"score_gpt":0.28777419507125135,"score_spread":0.2307316443702042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014248467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02831902,0.003344002,0.06608325,0.06348679,0.0014941624,0.0006358922,0.0003200388,0.0003246163,0.8359923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8009237,0.0016199287,0.020593606,0.026254974,0.0015280517,0.00067172135,0.00012719775,0.00012427727,0.1481566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822014,0.004040984,0.0013736673,0.0022790704,0.006961151,0.0031436598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879445,0.0059561944,0.0011155758,0.0021115234,0.0022712676,0.0006010746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014920787,0.0005997959,0.00072939,0.0012550306,0.0067899777,0.010036214,0.0031205318,0.0143399155,0.004933503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025551004,0.000906726,0.0011128203,0.0010199448,0.020459421,0.0037041667,0.003947197,0.013153764,0.0015824257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053526082,0.000013951313,0.0003371112,0.00002206609,0.0000065963964,0.00016910586,0.0013187183,0.00019889847,0.00012033961,0.9855876,0.007676692,0.004543577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010003988,0.00015530223,0.0032796327,0.0005729373,0.0000530688,0.0013750888,0.0012356946,0.0028311324,0.001401484,0.619996,0.36885652,0.00014312105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046384837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05751334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9536152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006818296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018407013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092229724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30144229","doi":"10.1111/pan.13448","title":"Smoke, Mirrors & Contract Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Severability; Law; Exclusion clause; Unconscionability; Law and economics; Privity of contract; Private law; Contract theory; Database transaction; Frustration of purpose; Relational contract; Contract management; Business; Public law; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04689551957298158,"score_gpt":0.36434719192604037,"score_spread":0.31745167235305877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30144229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053908816,0.0046785227,0.008654842,0.027800733,0.0010385311,0.00005088788,0.00008356351,0.000095798634,0.9522063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5642706,0.007124471,0.008823191,0.018056676,0.0019900443,0.0002495714,0.00017844893,0.0003359814,0.39897102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969031,0.0011389072,0.00008410936,0.00060660526,0.0009343532,0.00033291665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986343,0.0005683133,0.00009628256,0.00035830805,0.00023675762,0.00010593687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003392133,0.0004525962,0.0003978003,0.00098235,0.0068236515,0.008359734,0.0010526974,0.0044717174,0.017900882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072796843,0.00033061352,0.00044828228,0.0010818894,0.023886584,0.010652581,0.0037969293,0.0067330906,0.003225434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011331097,0.0000015061856,0.000025395419,0.0000029230046,3.428556e-7,0.000010693874,0.00036408287,0.00001519448,0.00000839756,0.99556524,0.002950897,0.0010541372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047303993,0.0000068515637,0.000119603006,0.000056604214,0.0000021548506,0.00006932245,0.0007016787,0.00019960877,0.00007184079,0.68933964,0.30942118,0.000006755762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011358785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007457262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017900882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067822607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004384565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05988443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014659821","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0095","title":"The implications of property as self-government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Land tenure; Alienation; Land law; Property rights; Corporate governance; Scholarship; Property (philosophy); Political science; Government (linguistics); Common ownership; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.017524330141002003,"score_gpt":0.24212745615857714,"score_spread":0.22460312601757515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014659821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060985718,0.011708029,0.030709464,0.058097545,0.0005576606,0.000046519162,0.000092130875,0.00009451621,0.8377085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97429866,0.0027597107,0.0026702934,0.0018078821,0.00036715713,0.000052621246,0.000033335116,0.000030906278,0.017979423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751294,0.0011165813,0.000078505465,0.00042098446,0.00041056643,0.0004603485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716043,0.0014999142,0.0002687674,0.00054600573,0.00030706907,0.00021788271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022269853,0.00023022514,0.00036417914,0.001021691,0.0041259136,0.0072499993,0.0010852669,0.003402939,0.0050994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036733449,0.00019953193,0.00057792204,0.0011493055,0.03364002,0.009976701,0.0036204194,0.0030327588,0.00056311046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001554717,0.000002356071,0.000047830075,0.0000053858275,7.90712e-7,0.000017566595,0.00023133846,0.00017034012,0.000013642715,0.9984573,0.00024889104,0.00080284465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050961753,0.0000063432,0.00013338756,0.000021278296,0.000001809842,0.00002560853,0.00022592628,0.00051838416,0.000052113115,0.9782195,0.020787217,0.0000033300823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007587597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031174405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007587597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005771591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032141826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041876018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017427509","doi":"","title":"Natural Law and the Nature of Law in a Nutshell","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Flinders University; Monash University; Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; Macquarie University; University of Alberta; University of Oxford; York University; Bond University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Natural law; Law; Natural (archaeology); Relevance (law); Philosophy of law; Natural order; Political science; Positive law; Comparative law; Black letter law; Philosophy; Private law; Geography","score_opus":0.021494491693023494,"score_gpt":0.297659598069635,"score_spread":0.2761651063766115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017427509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00646672,0.018176213,0.023206193,0.12986241,0.0022282011,0.00009708067,0.0003889316,0.00016530901,0.819409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70637846,0.018817907,0.026005222,0.07329826,0.0060889614,0.000489997,0.0008107086,0.00032389324,0.16778654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982193,0.0007097486,0.000094800336,0.00027843233,0.0005633224,0.00013433685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981627,0.0007654221,0.00018188632,0.00032696917,0.00043897794,0.00012405806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019776302,0.00033967188,0.00041575267,0.0016259614,0.0044076955,0.008032458,0.0013860486,0.004864076,0.010529971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034670825,0.00035428687,0.00036219537,0.0016236146,0.032215867,0.010490517,0.0023747536,0.006073399,0.0023220386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001854662,0.0000040164555,0.000061734725,0.0000141073515,0.0000013308604,0.000015011856,0.00042604943,0.000037304355,0.000031512613,0.9903133,0.0071789445,0.0019149166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004668675,0.000007205735,0.00036876762,0.00013876926,0.0000030570006,0.00012028919,0.00064514007,0.0001420525,0.000058325586,0.75026375,0.24823979,0.000008169264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011706352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019760154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011706352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038634038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065896753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035226226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020879179","doi":"","title":"Conscience With a Filter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Equity (law); Morality; Law and economics; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Normative; Sociology","score_opus":0.019761823654179805,"score_gpt":0.27790530879503633,"score_spread":0.2581434851408565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020879179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08797208,0.0015404224,0.119813345,0.020949015,0.0008168807,0.00012500533,0.00012646956,0.00025986723,0.768397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489612,0.0003513464,0.0065457677,0.0037872544,0.00041264624,0.000077525765,0.000051762127,0.00006550444,0.03974687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966564,0.00069033494,0.00012515973,0.00080404495,0.0010484064,0.0006756946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961116,0.0016925085,0.00037265985,0.0008364219,0.0006173649,0.000369518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002859816,0.0004666027,0.00037508822,0.00137304,0.0033525801,0.0049605337,0.0008389577,0.0032102421,0.009323071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009557833,0.0001969738,0.0008851885,0.0006139144,0.014882693,0.008571138,0.0032059893,0.0030522007,0.0008521301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007982727,0.000008909758,0.00042314953,0.000012631731,0.0000034026157,0.00007205506,0.0010510067,0.00010915283,0.0001606476,0.9936604,0.0008799816,0.0036108538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014327699,0.000044639444,0.0017423447,0.00007413012,0.000015921783,0.00026559728,0.0007014471,0.0013452496,0.00039681207,0.9310638,0.06431192,0.00002380146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046523116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026781848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009323071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025707483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021320519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031188726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022274203","doi":"10.5539/ass.v16n5p148","title":"The Doctrine of Ultra Vires: Commendable or Condemnable!","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ultra vires; Doctrine; Creditor; Shareholder; Law; Business; English law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.04623671998949008,"score_gpt":0.3516685603337937,"score_spread":0.3054318403443036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022274203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11040563,0.010821206,0.060798157,0.043427728,0.001502574,0.00006865649,0.000100732635,0.00012157491,0.7727537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427579,0.0015656865,0.0048313984,0.0041926005,0.00049538806,0.00005209785,0.000029670791,0.00004889778,0.046026263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531025,0.0018872533,0.00026870758,0.00067609537,0.001317375,0.00054035714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548054,0.0021023531,0.0004995046,0.0009176433,0.0007281284,0.00027177893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006006021,0.0002663308,0.0003893384,0.0008551523,0.0025314316,0.00646719,0.0011049596,0.0032300823,0.0033431102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012453705,0.00025354553,0.0003899128,0.00064537424,0.027321035,0.007793866,0.0038699482,0.0051775165,0.0008649391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036650174,0.0000019600873,0.00011063633,0.0000069594457,6.923965e-7,0.000025787172,0.0007832854,0.00001961319,0.000064139815,0.99693054,0.00052959804,0.0015232094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012446678,0.000055709726,0.0011556356,0.00021958571,0.000010484942,0.00029991576,0.0027128044,0.0006701138,0.00078280055,0.8380236,0.15603116,0.000025694542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037692473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037431526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00646719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019679244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036619666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031763256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023061461","doi":"","title":"Commonwealth v. Western Australia and the Operation in Federal Systems of the Presumption that Statutes do not Apply to The Crown","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Commonwealth; Statute; Law; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing; Medicine","score_opus":0.147808435311745,"score_gpt":0.38682175027404436,"score_spread":0.23901331496229936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023061461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11641858,0.0036512357,0.00428437,0.030324114,0.000517968,0.00013847489,0.00011498742,0.00009546111,0.8444548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7636103,0.0010468694,0.0036460545,0.026661448,0.00019837011,0.00026106887,0.00006860877,0.000041441166,0.2044659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532324,0.0011133369,0.00029538776,0.00065550645,0.0016028946,0.0010096193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701583,0.0011513932,0.0004005386,0.00045379266,0.0006164215,0.00036212092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037141172,0.00024724138,0.00028371802,0.00080852606,0.009431446,0.0040713865,0.0009753393,0.0050424803,0.003827766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009500599,0.0006580204,0.00036445976,0.00096889085,0.008690159,0.002899283,0.0033797238,0.0050782347,0.0005179054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002824722,0.000017713346,0.0022893606,0.000056148932,0.0000125300385,0.00039517903,0.007807605,0.00016640361,0.0005703927,0.959994,0.018722557,0.0099398745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006910057,0.00013767344,0.036644183,0.0006527015,0.00009553656,0.00089833885,0.0041489415,0.0023206177,0.001960757,0.21487403,0.7380369,0.00016135968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3429192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47056457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3429192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062437262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015340487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6818464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024744873","doi":"10.4324/9780429056550-2","title":"The implied obligation of good faith","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Faith; Philosophy; Good faith; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.0344626129516426,"score_gpt":0.2907933194414055,"score_spread":0.2563307064897629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024744873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063398243,0.0029482178,0.01921102,0.011322608,0.00058083946,0.00005200232,0.0000565523,0.000057933277,0.95943105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6399177,0.0038273644,0.01769471,0.016007058,0.0012365162,0.0002742435,0.00018961179,0.0001841909,0.32066858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041474,0.0044412855,0.00044000315,0.000967832,0.003062201,0.00067391223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460596,0.0028439276,0.00033414937,0.0010462982,0.0009399014,0.00022983902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057212207,0.00038387923,0.00041494297,0.000862199,0.0036041613,0.007888942,0.0010628246,0.004065034,0.0068463283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141602,0.0004585443,0.0004886304,0.00082123716,0.026232557,0.0077390783,0.004936111,0.009098367,0.0017352923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016884119,0.0000025982145,0.000027233897,0.000011584465,9.57574e-7,0.000014344276,0.00076622405,0.00003843746,0.0000423941,0.9944149,0.0025383548,0.0021412459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008882485,0.000024235393,0.00039177836,0.0002869015,0.0000094396255,0.0001570649,0.00091477635,0.00041495374,0.00033855007,0.73101765,0.26641667,0.000019214129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004095897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048006545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007888942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034043463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054117152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030257106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026209127","doi":"","title":"The Tort of Nuisance: 'Trucking On'","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Harm; Honour; Law; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Permission; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01244556866015709,"score_gpt":0.30345800432432857,"score_spread":0.29101243566417145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026209127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047772754,0.0042907256,0.008484787,0.06843492,0.0023804174,0.000069940674,0.00016085825,0.00009718935,0.8683084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64878356,0.002473746,0.0020299307,0.018400904,0.00063123694,0.00006902991,0.00006604688,0.00009694949,0.3274486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975656,0.00040412767,0.00008503093,0.00031798854,0.0009915279,0.0006357506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860066,0.0006283702,0.00013333549,0.00025915363,0.00027636607,0.00010209916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002763765,0.00031951722,0.0005029123,0.0005509426,0.007430859,0.00521225,0.0012289364,0.007851356,0.010612668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008116098,0.0003797102,0.000696168,0.00040453934,0.01363604,0.0054425006,0.004332195,0.005668948,0.0012346426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014738363,0.000008696779,0.0003985838,0.000026714619,0.0000047101294,0.00048159034,0.008766356,0.00012140252,0.00022244324,0.94793075,0.0368121,0.005211918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015578882,0.00004746302,0.002385999,0.00040501103,0.000026061565,0.0007441095,0.009152677,0.00046086678,0.0006022374,0.16162865,0.8244681,0.00006324357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07167347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09907809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07167347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035023214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040306994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14251256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027151415","doi":"","title":"The Barrie guide to tort 2020. Volume 1","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Law; Liability; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01118540391842486,"score_gpt":0.25943406872022245,"score_spread":0.24824866480179758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027151415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021710231,0.013128211,0.0050767004,0.0076350668,0.0017251022,0.00014785212,0.004940279,0.0017305976,0.96539915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024948204,0.008107722,0.003300918,0.0030483524,0.00030247855,0.00015651922,0.004231938,0.0005777402,0.9777795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875,0.00017899946,0.000068530106,0.0000937895,0.00076481595,0.00014384823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987374,0.00036699063,0.00006286983,0.00010516092,0.00061561086,0.00011194247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012225866,0.0010362264,0.0005942825,0.0030894922,0.0019950296,0.0049260664,0.0012299833,0.0028798403,0.29834148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003827028,0.0008662302,0.00051539217,0.0021042028,0.001351933,0.0045041186,0.0019089164,0.0033442385,0.18527284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028567158,0.00000815004,0.00004027622,0.000039285933,5.432529e-7,0.000017288505,0.00009567769,0.000071055394,0.00002727706,0.03397196,0.92371774,0.04200779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.534458e-7,0.000002338788,0.000085691754,0.00011431523,4.4078794e-7,0.000034794193,0.00003726843,0.000027549604,0.000012481669,0.005277134,0.99440324,0.0000037947293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019920977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042588096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29834148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024672565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051045357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028963871","doi":"10.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i28.p163-178.2020","title":"LA BONNE FOI ET LE PRECEDENT: BHASIN C. HRYNEW ET LA COMMON LAW CANADIENNE","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"National Strength and Conditioning Association; BC Cancer Agency; China Scholarship Council; Royal Bank of Canada","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04135992791512559,"score_gpt":0.3425931463324707,"score_spread":0.30123321841734507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028963871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02868648,0.022294043,0.035073787,0.089502215,0.0014275676,0.00007776453,0.0003044304,0.0000691879,0.82256454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64726365,0.011802652,0.015194496,0.015088157,0.00055871136,0.00016016778,0.00017684445,0.00015982143,0.30959556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506015,0.001291753,0.00015593666,0.001029999,0.0018237288,0.00063837826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585307,0.0016195906,0.0002470407,0.00043889543,0.0014743177,0.00036715055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033560218,0.00048451594,0.00067244,0.0017283849,0.00962369,0.009118366,0.0013113056,0.003226627,0.010406026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008176958,0.00064450054,0.00062387396,0.002699765,0.019826975,0.007452865,0.0036633308,0.008732493,0.0011528917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005110235,0.0000026637304,0.00012289386,0.000014271886,0.0000022153513,0.000046838086,0.0015175489,0.00010728299,0.000050726267,0.9919304,0.0037786008,0.0024213688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011236849,0.0000149323905,0.0012145853,0.00032931843,0.000016396814,0.0001200724,0.0028625997,0.0009062154,0.00027816443,0.6984806,0.2956931,0.000072806004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55477536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57623106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44522464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037054893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027180022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8956933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029642795","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2020.1765527","title":"Policy and principle and the character of private law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Tort; Character (mathematics); Law; Philosophy of law; Common law; Public law; Law and economics; Commercial law; Economic Justice; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Liability","score_opus":0.02264501890873773,"score_gpt":0.3312103775753268,"score_spread":0.3085653586665891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029642795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005648379,0.0022043434,0.0056848894,0.6374929,0.0017734269,0.0000553022,0.00014511697,0.0000740021,0.34692162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.489267,0.0019165761,0.0036329266,0.37476307,0.0050927624,0.00046543762,0.00011678909,0.00018246852,0.124562964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810157,0.009087389,0.00068003783,0.0037168167,0.00332903,0.0021710661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826984,0.012566732,0.0008263855,0.0016365016,0.0017669213,0.000505095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011573456,0.0005012789,0.00063047354,0.001195667,0.011029204,0.014199987,0.0025845817,0.032453623,0.013552241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027684303,0.00052221684,0.0010517641,0.0016033791,0.04024215,0.018066583,0.0054388703,0.020083573,0.00255442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047495855,0.000003393508,0.000039686714,0.000013806148,0.0000010059232,0.000026825626,0.0009046888,0.00003115004,0.000027819851,0.9852542,0.01304044,0.0006521805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029533474,0.000015028581,0.00042074503,0.0001686194,0.0000070875135,0.00006481957,0.0020261363,0.000426589,0.00025329954,0.73308015,0.26347753,0.000030414643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022294916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014256165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032453623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01376692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072584096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09988648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030175355","doi":"","title":"The Non-Abdication Rule in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abdication; Delegation; Doctrine; Political science; Delegate; Law; Legislature; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Parliament; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.012077934473355407,"score_gpt":0.27816970439345273,"score_spread":0.2660917699200973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030175355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035439,0.002379489,0.023719296,0.020800173,0.0003479547,0.00012295948,0.00037854793,0.00011291157,0.9166997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166557,0.0018499574,0.013430302,0.00419014,0.00021876744,0.00008038853,0.00020432187,0.000046478035,0.06332386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913892,0.0010075766,0.00042060626,0.001411695,0.0039497325,0.0018210826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570554,0.0013648561,0.00020583933,0.0005918522,0.0018399649,0.00029205295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004392699,0.0003956604,0.0005256522,0.001392882,0.008653733,0.007585274,0.0016199751,0.0029504225,0.0053352485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010397073,0.00048080157,0.00065130205,0.0020769797,0.017310856,0.0031484147,0.0029485729,0.0056075444,0.00062343496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002217331,0.000001541553,0.000115987285,0.0000089475625,0.0000013571646,0.000036700712,0.0003920104,0.00011834432,0.00005830989,0.9956388,0.0013747185,0.0022511156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051799136,0.000014417309,0.0033041216,0.00018603611,0.00003181677,0.00025571042,0.0009750841,0.002466498,0.00058218266,0.7966102,0.19544668,0.00007540253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8589318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85544944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14106822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040655147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05650568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29497516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031497718","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3485","title":"Bringing Rule of Law and Fairness to the Dysfunctional World of Sovereign Debt: A Role for Canada?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Debt restructuring; Restructuring; Jurisdiction; Insolvency; Creditor; Economics; Internal debt; Senior debt; Business; Law; Debt; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Debt-to-GDP ratio; Finance; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02375040094380441,"score_gpt":0.26300140201658245,"score_spread":0.23925100107277805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031497718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035990033,0.00931843,0.0050437064,0.7050994,0.0016011838,0.00007837548,0.0001637536,0.00009352368,0.24261153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85107225,0.00798584,0.005212994,0.073891744,0.0004988256,0.00005559961,0.00009609812,0.00008827261,0.06109837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256766,0.0010808081,0.000153933,0.0008724005,0.002222097,0.0031031226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98570216,0.003074552,0.0007090316,0.00096180453,0.0058419155,0.0037106234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006530848,0.0003425226,0.0006644986,0.0011208139,0.022657175,0.014746068,0.0024707774,0.008243443,0.0060570454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019989587,0.00035721523,0.0006277065,0.0019174014,0.022630608,0.008468531,0.0047176303,0.009760519,0.0004632081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022598326,0.000017673347,0.0021999367,0.000050412935,0.000008787524,0.00016581742,0.0042710933,0.00042603858,0.00011690392,0.9419277,0.033236865,0.017556187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006780325,0.00004032271,0.009543239,0.000806325,0.000070306356,0.00026415056,0.013518767,0.0029399197,0.0006278366,0.31708583,0.654802,0.00023343506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98208433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98591995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12120438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12120438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30780646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8794035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032505178","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2020-41 Friends of Toronto Public Cemeteries Inc. v. Public Guardian and Trustee","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Law; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration","score_opus":0.02445253050181338,"score_gpt":0.243971490218963,"score_spread":0.21951895971714963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032505178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008625192,0.0029707542,0.00047000663,0.032581873,0.0017003749,0.00034392683,0.0068503576,0.0002127526,0.9462447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038805608,0.0008937426,0.00025458063,0.012108308,0.00026520688,0.00014840087,0.0015884311,0.00005862428,0.945877],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764985,0.00012900835,0.00007116457,0.00017192248,0.0011846202,0.00079347246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981425,0.00033417591,0.00007132993,0.00008931186,0.00096603646,0.00039668404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011124033,0.0008687194,0.0002877207,0.0017817587,0.0128318705,0.0044365926,0.001964899,0.011318967,0.08296363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00421518,0.00089872343,0.0006100775,0.001457054,0.0020915153,0.0013736684,0.0018700305,0.005907758,0.018508958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039589846,0.00003119542,0.00091525255,0.00005587143,0.000005352147,0.0006297657,0.00073783996,0.00009366739,0.0002458908,0.03102501,0.96183306,0.0043875994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034822584,0.000025990084,0.008841319,0.00015210213,0.00002143582,0.0002471693,0.0013761177,0.00022913901,0.0005885229,0.0021163216,0.9863282,0.000038839175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87435997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96416926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12564003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027320033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03478631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27754098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036205926","doi":"10.1002/iir.1382","title":"Promoting fairness in English insolvency valuation cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Creditor; Valuation (finance); Debtor; Bankruptcy; Harm; Shareholder; Actuarial science; Law and economics; English law; Business; Accounting; Economics; Law; Finance; Debt; Political science","score_opus":0.12684449119533425,"score_gpt":0.3954854117395872,"score_spread":0.2686409205442529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036205926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36485294,0.0050610574,0.09287689,0.012239572,0.00033116445,0.00051130564,0.00009152398,0.000083981446,0.52395165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98926127,0.00048033404,0.0056342883,0.0008485057,0.00008771382,0.0000792981,0.00001165307,0.000006253974,0.0035906173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9587972,0.0267424,0.0016163384,0.0015427172,0.008405426,0.002895903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94838643,0.03647497,0.0039185495,0.0028641175,0.0077537317,0.00060221815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035715107,0.00034788862,0.00071760395,0.002876731,0.003124355,0.007949534,0.0010733533,0.0020376958,0.0027339996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067107104,0.00028512324,0.0003857472,0.0019552808,0.011580403,0.004678995,0.004896483,0.002221953,0.00027853827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029460887,0.00007358106,0.0037407912,0.0000997168,0.000013327666,0.00025090112,0.0048274333,0.0009865904,0.00049957214,0.9649221,0.00192635,0.022630192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088555455,0.00028781884,0.019492796,0.001472923,0.000094855764,0.00048525704,0.009004296,0.011059383,0.0040801936,0.89253175,0.061293337,0.00010882809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057779313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007622775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035715107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004075867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004270148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18888175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036709131","doi":"10.25071/1925-5624.40370","title":"Acknowledgments and Credits","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tusaaji A Translation Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.08496526746287315,"score_gpt":0.41447258018361016,"score_spread":0.329507312720737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036709131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007866776,0.0031480717,0.0062695667,0.20723793,0.31253657,0.0019885015,0.053533167,0.0031441322,0.41135538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013296043,0.0024293715,0.005748296,0.031130042,0.027062714,0.0034113878,0.03213347,0.0022602268,0.88252836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825156,0.004658124,0.0010067859,0.001227742,0.009393691,0.0011980942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85777014,0.020348765,0.0041439193,0.009683397,0.09802908,0.0100246705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013272163,0.0009552981,0.001468061,0.0072409445,0.002865804,0.0067231036,0.0027849942,0.0033750483,0.63514936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18482469,0.00057279033,0.00067834044,0.005093643,0.0014211045,0.004347374,0.005302906,0.004845258,0.4366753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010512327,0.000004712496,0.000025388366,0.000053533695,6.7533995e-7,0.000007886752,0.000028331655,0.000012322347,0.000016163565,0.002686508,0.9920819,0.0050719697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019822004,0.0000059528716,0.00033465202,0.00041267913,0.0000031285801,0.000021787264,0.0002804412,0.000113811206,0.000059998205,0.0029016556,0.9958348,0.00001125804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009695278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011890453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36485064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004972639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00958677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5204151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036779457","doi":"10.25071/1925-5624.40391","title":"Acknowledgments and Credits","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tusaaji A Translation Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.16102639344283137,"score_gpt":0.3844557054046228,"score_spread":0.22342931196179144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036779457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068112457,0.002364423,0.005190462,0.17138413,0.25959516,0.0015812225,0.043191183,0.0033906493,0.51262164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007154435,0.001293773,0.0037241883,0.021572165,0.016746761,0.001658233,0.019682987,0.0016742832,0.92649317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862846,0.0032633855,0.00064203143,0.0010241232,0.007807005,0.0009787794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8901804,0.013680167,0.0027476456,0.007049361,0.07710746,0.009234958],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010429081,0.0009079016,0.0013065751,0.005923242,0.0029806956,0.0066792686,0.0025929764,0.0031575372,0.68309915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12903045,0.00052997883,0.00063620484,0.0037232065,0.0012646056,0.0037031726,0.0050473055,0.00469344,0.51781356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009001933,0.000004297444,0.000023020568,0.000035094774,4.7097086e-7,0.000007362146,0.000022422153,0.000009333058,0.000016487931,0.0020196806,0.99277496,0.0050779385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001369522,0.0000047089134,0.00025165777,0.00022067876,0.0000020046175,0.000018417653,0.00020657081,0.000078774785,0.000049990234,0.0020330686,0.9971125,0.0000078276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009713722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013075916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31690085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043658316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00908478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4520206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043080976","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0031","title":"The office of ownership revisited","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Property (philosophy); Easement; Law and economics; Business; Property rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028994996894398883,"score_gpt":0.2555444730131005,"score_spread":0.22654947611870163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043080976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056481875,0.01629226,0.026260858,0.177083,0.0017715858,0.000041416504,0.00011746684,0.000067172296,0.7218843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412241,0.0037531215,0.0012952164,0.01171509,0.0016390685,0.000060555692,0.000037106023,0.00007289241,0.040202916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265033,0.0025448161,0.00022778138,0.0011676266,0.0019070372,0.0015023955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947819,0.0033110804,0.0004339847,0.00047961876,0.00058362895,0.000409672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057572518,0.00037989306,0.00061391667,0.0011858525,0.0063332175,0.009043228,0.0018504752,0.0071796514,0.007686542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009726354,0.00034930868,0.00075477205,0.0012125554,0.03916086,0.017484704,0.007550649,0.010060059,0.00066486315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003204108,0.0000016014208,0.000053777647,0.0000049632536,6.219995e-7,0.000022009282,0.0008173519,0.000022895661,0.000010396578,0.9970999,0.0009769951,0.000986358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028271326,0.000025936224,0.0006748836,0.00019928701,0.000011794978,0.00015372428,0.0031512785,0.00054977334,0.00026832015,0.771461,0.22345327,0.00002234838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025570873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014690045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025570873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008727169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059498814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06332028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043611909","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0032","title":"Office and contracting-out: an analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Odds; Phenomenon; Government (linguistics); Public office; Business; Service (business); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02467461157356531,"score_gpt":0.2708792790045017,"score_spread":0.24620466743093639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043611909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3652,0.0021560257,0.02685313,0.010372539,0.00012069384,0.00018641622,0.00012576245,0.000028537379,0.5949568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839272,0.00093818543,0.0017694285,0.00046597718,0.00006578464,0.000055314074,0.000038756083,0.000019724836,0.012719575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965785,0.0013253767,0.000090317655,0.00018544568,0.0006060476,0.0012143854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966608,0.0022198448,0.0003229584,0.00017857802,0.0002959213,0.00032185824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030700427,0.0002592047,0.00041842894,0.0016745683,0.009276091,0.005091954,0.0010310182,0.0016865436,0.009069502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00503641,0.00018539856,0.0007730633,0.0024180366,0.012272617,0.004913431,0.004896971,0.0025609538,0.00035827898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025331485,0.00003793846,0.0018517188,0.000026522215,0.0000021594954,0.00041332364,0.012349513,0.00021577827,0.000055374127,0.9791829,0.0009860366,0.0048534907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077803066,0.0001433163,0.015298749,0.00043663947,0.000054552533,0.0011641075,0.11490705,0.008500569,0.0012358851,0.6396069,0.21850538,0.00006893778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02406405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019980213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02406405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005885676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056045884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047847986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043848731","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2020.68.2.bevacqua","title":"Unresolved Controversies in Suing for Negligence of Tax Officials: Canadian and Australasian Insights and a Primer for Policy Makers' Consideration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Liability; Common law; Law; Tax law; Jurisprudence; Agency (philosophy); Judicial review; CLARITY; Law and economics; Economics; Double taxation; Sociology","score_opus":0.03485211775955609,"score_gpt":0.27548922684911525,"score_spread":0.24063710908955915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043848731","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072202757,0.049129464,0.0014412492,0.8947619,0.001763832,0.000056071895,0.000034257664,0.00002184251,0.045571107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5902524,0.11729129,0.010737926,0.25815925,0.0040320097,0.00016049756,0.000076986486,0.00006841961,0.019221256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768669,0.007891911,0.0011631653,0.0017516252,0.0064272736,0.0058991453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638339,0.021579549,0.0017350919,0.0006112444,0.009008451,0.0032317257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029508904,0.0009908944,0.001443395,0.007728064,0.03138636,0.028713578,0.0071113687,0.027023967,0.004663566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037118237,0.00068942,0.0012634125,0.008655623,0.076044984,0.01994322,0.006786984,0.021840151,0.00033648044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016553684,0.000048160535,0.0009165234,0.00029996887,0.000011908694,0.00073830487,0.05348864,0.00042695692,0.00017820683,0.882225,0.034693766,0.026956048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033481352,0.000044563563,0.0035204468,0.0042808224,0.00006056957,0.00072295486,0.18732224,0.0014284942,0.00024539337,0.4198883,0.3821875,0.00026536055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92265695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95283467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15962794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15962794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23089468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9747125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044136967","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i1.5855","title":"Recent Developments in the Law of Equitable Remedies: What Canada Can Do For You","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Supreme court; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04301465892440598,"score_gpt":0.26593507759359203,"score_spread":0.22292041866918605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044136967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004815043,0.1788471,0.002807769,0.63646376,0.0026143917,0.000022484115,0.000174059,0.00006278715,0.17419256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32078198,0.29285845,0.007015234,0.26954076,0.005176193,0.00004898706,0.00019327222,0.000110870154,0.10427425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907836,0.00090582686,0.0002467124,0.00068327226,0.005529639,0.0018510208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873974,0.003782731,0.0005706298,0.0004616896,0.006364154,0.001423345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055744275,0.00047368702,0.00070494495,0.0023421762,0.010704942,0.012181406,0.0021489596,0.0094886795,0.0060865274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018016208,0.000379198,0.00047801694,0.0039681382,0.02074557,0.0059875343,0.0022313676,0.010911617,0.0005215776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011737317,0.000013769744,0.0004792869,0.0001808764,0.000009623378,0.00009828951,0.000744177,0.0004104217,0.00010942559,0.87816006,0.080461614,0.039320637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001376409,0.000013828995,0.002508855,0.00073776103,0.000028796167,0.00010668567,0.0010363882,0.00044893887,0.0001916608,0.13155816,0.8632819,0.0000731879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9453819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96462905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06335381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06335381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.117663614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4596662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045202888","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2019-0136","title":"A theory of mistaken assumptions in contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Appeal; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Freedom of contract; Common law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.033215750537898256,"score_gpt":0.2628744662742217,"score_spread":0.2296587157363234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045202888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040294435,0.0041675367,0.30710083,0.048095375,0.00071283156,0.00021939195,0.00022747177,0.00017624335,0.5990058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944938,0.0013218344,0.024322113,0.0054790475,0.0005836499,0.00031314715,0.00007155494,0.00006941576,0.02290125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804813,0.007703672,0.00084987405,0.002255954,0.006563288,0.0021459418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98067564,0.01260472,0.0014654984,0.0025277964,0.0021644745,0.00056186196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016649006,0.0007379903,0.0006794682,0.0026849357,0.007201407,0.010632423,0.003632121,0.0099075595,0.0071333805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026992816,0.00095387927,0.001468312,0.002122248,0.04522641,0.021723544,0.00651017,0.010805959,0.0011106177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011675891,0.0000013592769,0.000019992,0.0000025126678,6.8801484e-7,0.000013170224,0.0002118938,0.00009425139,0.000004460129,0.9992132,0.00016796151,0.00026924675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068481204,0.0000041090034,0.00002872304,0.000024382181,0.0000023638681,0.000029777191,0.00010239118,0.00096665666,0.000032492233,0.9932541,0.005542158,0.0000060546536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011541111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005968869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016649006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013309322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007904318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09656632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045746807","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12442","title":"The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (QLD): A form of private governance in action?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Indigenous; Cultural heritage; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Public administration; State (computer science); Political science; Business; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.07945084795307564,"score_gpt":0.3896657111469507,"score_spread":0.31021486319387503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045746807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082757704,0.0036484431,0.028166834,0.4300954,0.001065971,0.00018179484,0.00012831097,0.00008676277,0.4538687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9657097,0.00070157135,0.004042024,0.0127402255,0.00015754637,0.00008958719,0.00003434367,0.000021718757,0.01650321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98226845,0.00887998,0.0005849455,0.0013361684,0.004401302,0.0025292295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97938204,0.0097407475,0.0020304946,0.0027876308,0.004013886,0.0020451676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017160255,0.00014912829,0.00044874358,0.00071563164,0.0065002744,0.01581203,0.0015008479,0.005414963,0.0036732038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02416612,0.00037296413,0.000414407,0.0013823478,0.036399372,0.005651239,0.0057342933,0.00752337,0.0003656386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050794342,0.000012616242,0.0008710868,0.000026967758,0.0000031401346,0.000074073934,0.007028875,0.00016415819,0.00008954703,0.98312646,0.0044592065,0.0041387095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003353867,0.000051027822,0.007311675,0.0010206352,0.00001869655,0.00022366822,0.023600385,0.0019628033,0.00044658646,0.63738763,0.32788375,0.000059621398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16145456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12235275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16145456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018717183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041824874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3210296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046664697","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198813668.001.0001","title":"Company Directors’ Duties and Conflicts of Interest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Statutory law; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Business; Law; Common law; Political science; Order (exchange); Accounting; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.11815853599006741,"score_gpt":0.33384416670217776,"score_spread":0.21568563071211033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046664697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016873516,0.018943928,0.0044247755,0.023382558,0.0019199572,0.00012539145,0.00020851924,0.00004964574,0.93407166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5582389,0.020662695,0.0045034015,0.015022152,0.0024249633,0.00028800816,0.00057732966,0.000104790335,0.39817768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836361,0.006795099,0.0009497577,0.0009337463,0.0058650644,0.0018202135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98571,0.008925892,0.0014043439,0.0006262019,0.002587129,0.000746422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053122384,0.00033922482,0.00039006188,0.0017335429,0.0035729967,0.0085646445,0.0009895854,0.0028028814,0.018634707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021982668,0.00035337964,0.00027781684,0.0018444371,0.0044497633,0.0037818558,0.0037402073,0.0032356125,0.0031931142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024445326,0.000035717436,0.001804182,0.00017530928,0.000010506716,0.0006927123,0.007564064,0.0005252783,0.0002151723,0.77187943,0.1616958,0.05537744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008247083,0.000023496825,0.002331564,0.0008792382,0.0000075617513,0.00079234625,0.0055645714,0.00037938848,0.00036178168,0.060376212,0.9292485,0.000027039161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002733901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030983414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018634707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041142623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040586665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062339306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046703235","doi":"10.29173/alr2599","title":"The Conceptual Structure of Commercial Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Property (philosophy); Bankruptcy; Law and economics; Enforcement; Law; Property law; Argument (complex analysis); Function (biology); Real property; Property rights; Sociology; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04408306192145818,"score_gpt":0.33051945675389544,"score_spread":0.28643639483243727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046703235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035160042,0.040777598,0.14719835,0.18280762,0.0006422801,0.00017429049,0.00020378914,0.00015726278,0.5928788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471259,0.010346845,0.02406882,0.0064333496,0.00069014233,0.00035289364,0.00013762448,0.00007075963,0.010773643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98955065,0.006206769,0.00038260585,0.0010815474,0.0020901319,0.00068834255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865606,0.009823685,0.0008843369,0.0009748161,0.0012353434,0.0005213554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013333671,0.0004737159,0.00068998133,0.0055123107,0.005768899,0.017218804,0.002771668,0.00533173,0.004144031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015577154,0.00055754016,0.0006378872,0.0049702213,0.07503672,0.018436456,0.0043643336,0.007626791,0.00058314425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.215481e-7,0.0000011842375,0.000018424744,0.000004632455,3.3480322e-7,0.000005077853,0.00038015374,0.00003694398,0.0000045164093,0.9988186,0.00018416865,0.0005455376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004633073,0.000004217181,0.00011417201,0.00009850121,0.0000017386055,0.000027257724,0.0008634951,0.0004528144,0.000020847683,0.9737037,0.024703944,0.0000046416967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012662452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005595324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017218804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016003987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0106426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1161176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048446512","doi":"","title":"Townshend v. Townshend & Buttar v. Buttar : Gifts, Exclusions, and Intentions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.06655443817021048,"score_gpt":0.33343272735938606,"score_spread":0.26687828918917555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048446512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21515325,0.011413052,0.0024213712,0.29263222,0.0006122987,0.00009390214,0.00032511496,0.00003855986,0.47731018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96555114,0.0019323501,0.00026805338,0.012694979,0.0001350124,0.000030398289,0.000026677633,0.0000095524565,0.019351773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970701,0.0008648763,0.00013805596,0.00022012206,0.00089913013,0.0008076178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915176,0.005218013,0.0006012363,0.00033895925,0.0011986023,0.0011254223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043211025,0.00021695717,0.00042761822,0.0015734567,0.010048237,0.0053998376,0.001230547,0.0073550744,0.006420764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018783938,0.00031878633,0.00039613197,0.0013313035,0.014265148,0.004152174,0.004023273,0.0060978252,0.00031641457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057309662,0.00005361702,0.0083821835,0.00003510661,0.000012733373,0.0004300554,0.00986357,0.0001474698,0.0001251122,0.93216026,0.04101803,0.0077145025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020422139,0.000119580094,0.08445156,0.001367259,0.0002474385,0.0011274058,0.06719703,0.0013173283,0.001785345,0.57594895,0.2659625,0.00027135998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2613774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39238432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7386226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007917952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013403381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51971203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048470204","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3635","title":"Pluralism and Convergence: Judicial Standardization in Canadian Corporate Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Statute; Corporate law; Comparative law; Pluralism (philosophy); Judicial review; Federalism; Common law; Separation of powers; Economics; Corporate governance; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.031186820522387675,"score_gpt":0.2971536755198012,"score_spread":0.2659668549974135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048470204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430295,0.0013318537,0.010177042,0.0031350516,0.000045861154,0.00008039746,0.00021486012,0.000059569207,0.041925766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880326,0.00008019862,0.0007952126,0.00006105898,0.0000131302895,0.0000054357215,0.00003384246,0.0000051450243,0.0002027697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9402494,0.016346758,0.002667166,0.008796224,0.027041592,0.004898806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8668583,0.07498835,0.017770294,0.011488042,0.025897183,0.0029976906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03461539,0.00021304005,0.0012757769,0.0089976145,0.007023448,0.0057665557,0.0016212419,0.0008453292,0.0015102978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19344361,0.0003295725,0.00061351224,0.013679714,0.020662501,0.0025008342,0.005223229,0.002004571,0.00007086435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002357844,0.000051259092,0.5436677,0.00017605576,0.00041453083,0.00040584276,0.046508256,0.004954084,0.0008529539,0.28028575,0.0027770181,0.11967086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056567842,0.00007830878,0.84419394,0.0001985344,0.00023560047,0.00021304873,0.019183433,0.012332103,0.0011943005,0.109994486,0.012190609,0.00012911219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73684454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.770162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024935778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035244692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5294105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W306084194","doi":"","title":"ECONOMIC DURESS IN CANADIAN LAW: TOWARDS A PRINCIPLED APPROACH","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Transaction cost; Inequality; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Bargaining power; Database transaction; Economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03387260653928575,"score_gpt":0.35497202132063843,"score_spread":0.3210994147813527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W306084194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010564999,0.014213008,0.07271106,0.28923523,0.0016126377,0.00024091435,0.00039405224,0.00009753816,0.61093044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84766865,0.021104677,0.041455925,0.038797166,0.0026953844,0.0004171352,0.00022213544,0.00013340097,0.04750553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97537893,0.005274608,0.00078699127,0.0015518259,0.013928917,0.0030786972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97666204,0.010071586,0.001008496,0.0015667999,0.009597675,0.0010933572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021439906,0.00087260036,0.0014587583,0.006702774,0.013271085,0.02116415,0.005161694,0.012167127,0.003921352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04360222,0.0009602476,0.0009866299,0.006105361,0.067654505,0.008696219,0.00560054,0.016287802,0.00037373824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001168359,0.000002578702,0.00007687903,0.00001739727,0.0000025057168,0.000013620026,0.0004791137,0.000374071,0.00000893167,0.99369216,0.0032515693,0.0020800848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086967575,0.0000038682715,0.0008852645,0.00022910403,0.0000114218865,0.00002138002,0.0007407095,0.0013500126,0.000046159883,0.9481372,0.04853316,0.000033107863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.839229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8397758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16077101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.088492736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.169027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6420628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080256185","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v39i2.5019","title":"The End of Fiduciary Accountability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Jurisprudence; Fiduciary; Accountability; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Project commissioning; License; Convention; Expression (computer science); Publishing; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.028252859306871145,"score_gpt":0.26001178622238574,"score_spread":0.23175892691551458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080256185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01635495,0.0057345456,0.028043024,0.42350632,0.0024658612,0.00003271421,0.00010781363,0.00022678706,0.52352804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8586959,0.0025255869,0.0073820995,0.070610225,0.003324415,0.00018424982,0.000059487833,0.00026614973,0.056951903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96604484,0.015809316,0.0008125743,0.0046912404,0.0077755977,0.004866397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643887,0.018785205,0.0019055575,0.0071180933,0.0052013877,0.0026009579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02868574,0.0005546554,0.0008814932,0.0015309973,0.01127879,0.016668282,0.0020207565,0.010684702,0.0079606995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05581295,0.0005137339,0.0007683768,0.00089605566,0.04634002,0.016838636,0.009427179,0.019447353,0.0018198625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010033495,0.0000053614845,0.00009695751,0.000009901528,0.0000023082011,0.000025074707,0.0009416392,0.00009563474,0.000034275185,0.98573095,0.008469013,0.004578789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012494731,0.000016437052,0.00029401152,0.00012302808,0.000004655881,0.000039242157,0.0005214778,0.0003709115,0.00013151353,0.8913032,0.107166134,0.000016872287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010728586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062734955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02868574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011082467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012842372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15170646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081104201","doi":"10.3968/11715","title":"Financial Innovation of the Chinese Financial Markets: New Types of Chattel Pledges","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; China; Autonomy; Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Finance; Law and economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03400502259633601,"score_gpt":0.3548956872955426,"score_spread":0.3208906646992066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081104201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7426334,0.001591966,0.040120993,0.010025583,0.0002690155,0.00036063607,0.00008526106,0.00016301428,0.20475012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98606837,0.00023426724,0.0036894076,0.00027417857,0.00006616071,0.00009230924,0.000021886508,0.000008185047,0.009545336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955668,0.002214475,0.00027666896,0.0004543965,0.0008310488,0.0006566599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99072355,0.0053921617,0.0011809111,0.0011095369,0.0007992708,0.0007944391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006600228,0.0003172407,0.00032040547,0.0020071676,0.0043732123,0.0045028063,0.0013367598,0.0016952334,0.00539503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012778295,0.0002496492,0.0005048744,0.0017521883,0.010694983,0.0072718007,0.0047375737,0.0019244335,0.00024894587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084012536,0.000093976225,0.01949,0.00019392028,0.000019475696,0.001367935,0.05831715,0.0011981871,0.0013058904,0.84111804,0.0029770988,0.073834404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014739623,0.00050178653,0.12317505,0.0010297489,0.00017139598,0.002571466,0.09040851,0.0419571,0.006503805,0.44622296,0.2869888,0.00032204567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053456738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005269653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006600228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044459263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003505087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03490579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081346637","doi":"10.46985/jms.v4i1.189","title":"The Rule of Causa Proxima as a Principle of Insurance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kathmandu School of Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Proximate and ultimate causation; Phrase; Subject matter; Subject (documents); Political science; Latin Americans; Kingdom; Order (exchange); Insurance law; History; Law; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Insurance policy; Computer science; General insurance; Linguistics; Finance","score_opus":0.023340616356035137,"score_gpt":0.34930388626714765,"score_spread":0.3259632699111125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081346637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0210138,0.016089514,0.15266906,0.046552997,0.0015720787,0.00017787018,0.0003967891,0.00013783007,0.76139003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88450235,0.0062433193,0.04181562,0.01771642,0.0020554399,0.0004427338,0.00016651246,0.00011512057,0.046942376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882548,0.0040298486,0.0009181012,0.0022522663,0.0037507876,0.0007942394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923449,0.0048820074,0.00059607835,0.0010100305,0.0010141265,0.00015280263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010179468,0.0003511039,0.001039422,0.0016063773,0.0038499176,0.005854624,0.001619915,0.0073158005,0.004740788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011603518,0.00066197565,0.0016975389,0.001255063,0.028492043,0.0070969397,0.003988994,0.008802014,0.0014100464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002017515,0.000001924227,0.000070569826,0.000020899213,0.0000034610098,0.000031545344,0.0002437346,0.0000825307,0.000038012215,0.997666,0.00073786377,0.0011014608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007868846,0.000013392522,0.0002635867,0.00008178885,0.000009037444,0.00020863736,0.0001347758,0.00027011504,0.00014906403,0.95405906,0.04479084,0.000011933341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039078775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030597984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010179468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029331972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041193613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053834856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081928491","doi":"","title":"Correcting Corrections: Resolving Confusion Over the Public Correction Requirement in the Ontario Securities Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pleading; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Statutory interpretation; Economic Justice; Statutory law; Legislative history; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Legislative intent; Confusion; Damages; Economics; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03664862055074099,"score_gpt":0.29538488605911795,"score_spread":0.258736265508377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081928491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1677255,0.004564724,0.06244838,0.25827363,0.00217447,0.0007124301,0.0005521718,0.00074519124,0.5028035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91984767,0.00087246735,0.013828452,0.019317154,0.0005441858,0.00024007384,0.00011452579,0.0001125575,0.045122877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93139976,0.016044801,0.005253921,0.0060253134,0.033357877,0.007918335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9395542,0.036791988,0.0036078857,0.006781929,0.011982719,0.0012813304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03313957,0.0007040865,0.0009536648,0.0020453483,0.015687045,0.01238701,0.0051126815,0.016966507,0.0027983352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080175795,0.0013149356,0.0010732546,0.0019583688,0.029426975,0.0061869095,0.006728357,0.011512163,0.0005318632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004931208,0.000027243705,0.0024021117,0.00010095338,0.000024065632,0.0007765507,0.014250953,0.00092318695,0.0008236892,0.93194145,0.030060831,0.018619599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018310144,0.00022047634,0.019031938,0.0015458523,0.00030257183,0.0016709547,0.015362903,0.009389656,0.0062963706,0.4311299,0.51436555,0.0005007417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49129036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67354023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50870967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044519827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0877919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9768615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082177200","doi":"","title":"Leapfrogging, Risk and Unjust Enrichment in Canada after Moore v. Sweet","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Leapfrogging; Law; Statutory law; High Court; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.00791575204045654,"score_gpt":0.23776174819922616,"score_spread":0.2298459961587696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082177200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25365773,0.014407582,0.005445621,0.19220148,0.0010796236,0.00021281057,0.0006059568,0.00012722475,0.532262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8712039,0.003121883,0.0016754747,0.0518487,0.00015411463,0.00006226319,0.000078032404,0.000054019052,0.07180164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994338,0.00046797522,0.00012538084,0.0005134147,0.002239225,0.0023159585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982658,0.00069965265,0.00010387777,0.00006471463,0.0005295924,0.00033637593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002895061,0.0003763459,0.0006086752,0.0011993501,0.025404334,0.009663625,0.0021431248,0.010540991,0.0029492783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074112876,0.0004957048,0.0006633204,0.002135969,0.015330024,0.002583036,0.004067135,0.009690197,0.00013969335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039207534,0.000020211202,0.002513404,0.00003981604,0.000018571904,0.0015969482,0.011568381,0.00082624017,0.00039764526,0.94754446,0.025572868,0.009862247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086381435,0.00009412229,0.017943794,0.0007441094,0.00017762258,0.0010221795,0.028159365,0.0031739674,0.0026561646,0.20473361,0.7406072,0.00060147257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98661137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10522392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10522392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1303888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7634565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082782546","doi":"","title":"Unjust Enrichment in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lloyd's maritime and commercial law quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Political science; Restitution; Law","score_opus":0.017384686461279848,"score_gpt":0.2464663517464606,"score_spread":0.22908166528518073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082782546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04837891,0.0073400363,0.0010366392,0.32356948,0.003068028,0.00015193758,0.00056881935,0.00012646211,0.61575973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31990528,0.002393118,0.0008659818,0.17081179,0.0004672261,0.00012754639,0.00018346311,0.00016898988,0.5050766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987997,0.001091824,0.00024920664,0.0012829178,0.0030701696,0.006308997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921698,0.00097445067,0.00018533129,0.0003541715,0.003333403,0.0029829168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044632307,0.00056977454,0.0011645738,0.0017729391,0.050367434,0.016501527,0.0033464609,0.017534051,0.028161168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014438017,0.0007595906,0.0008827194,0.0024788454,0.017690394,0.003708595,0.007994871,0.01891305,0.0017258684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059102404,0.00006547195,0.0032212501,0.00007861093,0.0000340292,0.00042385238,0.0077503566,0.00041536393,0.00016969956,0.6772688,0.29094732,0.019566132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052208583,0.000027286696,0.005516206,0.00023991548,0.00005325882,0.00010630579,0.0128853,0.00036329287,0.0002781943,0.049322147,0.9310526,0.000103249644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99139726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99597305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121174075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.121174075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35572413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87918353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083866835","doi":"10.29252/jfr.16.1.1","title":"The Requirements of Introducing the Common Property System to the Iranian Matrimonial Regime with a view to the Quebec Matrimonial Regime","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Convention; Political science; Law; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.13619142389959168,"score_gpt":0.4032527318822306,"score_spread":0.26706130798263894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083866835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097206846,0.0013983455,0.0074322177,0.02124489,0.0006238848,0.00040181063,0.0004293055,0.00016033683,0.8711024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83350736,0.0007464773,0.011110828,0.0038467634,0.00023626567,0.00031564655,0.0002415357,0.00006200559,0.14993308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642366,0.00065488135,0.00013137759,0.0003817915,0.0011876184,0.0012206405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970251,0.00037708474,0.00023925916,0.00036211946,0.0015876679,0.00040881874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023463839,0.00044962735,0.00030869662,0.0010407765,0.0066888076,0.0064441385,0.0016794262,0.0035315729,0.015094475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005755153,0.0002717035,0.0005514751,0.001231427,0.0057379403,0.0024501185,0.0017894683,0.003152476,0.0013422641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007502041,0.00006150634,0.0031805157,0.000089130925,0.0000117325135,0.0006482623,0.0020161145,0.00094210485,0.0011089143,0.9579331,0.014128778,0.019804668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017551544,0.00029523615,0.042190738,0.00068413856,0.00008661219,0.0009529281,0.011107935,0.0067149866,0.0046322495,0.096978374,0.835932,0.00024924302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.671045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7766687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.328955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030734425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03340033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6617845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084267595","doi":"","title":"A legal study on Malaysian contract law: economic duress and doctrine of unconscionability / Nur Liyana Mohd Norizam, Nurul Izzah Mohd Nazri and Puteri Farahwati Faizan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Law; Doctrine; Statute; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Political science; Statutory law; Legal doctrine; Freedom of contract; Order (exchange); Comparative law; Severability; Commercial law; Private law; Privity of contract; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management","score_opus":0.020547316958037066,"score_gpt":0.3235676737044657,"score_spread":0.30302035674642863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084267595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2489318,0.060653627,0.009691585,0.040882792,0.0004910365,0.00016417024,0.0001578027,0.000014804774,0.63901246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96216804,0.018147847,0.0018497643,0.0015466682,0.00030298988,0.000053819243,0.000040653034,0.000007651179,0.01588264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972042,0.0014121782,0.00015726012,0.0001735402,0.0006992136,0.00035359143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939528,0.0038700956,0.00095276826,0.00017818609,0.00080219423,0.0002439155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035359398,0.00031381744,0.00023261739,0.0025056314,0.0045999335,0.005500422,0.00075371796,0.0024377806,0.0030503818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068491367,0.00028897537,0.00034835344,0.0028637322,0.014721072,0.006656043,0.0018661789,0.0034948473,0.00027446565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004010024,0.000017921155,0.0010935381,0.0000479025,0.000001615441,0.00026705413,0.006645076,0.00019040702,0.000060788137,0.9862619,0.0013282321,0.004081591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000222642,0.00017727214,0.03295564,0.004019573,0.000040747556,0.0025330237,0.05821292,0.0067646964,0.0010969399,0.509416,0.38464305,0.000117886724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040450167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036759797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040450167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010564725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011294963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080429435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084586269","doi":"","title":"Relevance of Contract Law Solutions Under a Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Opinio Juris in Comparatione","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Equity (law); Civil code; Law; Obligation; Relevance (law); Severability; Civil law (Civil law); Duty; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Exclusion clause; Business; Public law; Economics; Contract management; Privity of contract; Computer science","score_opus":0.1581769974384676,"score_gpt":0.3854013803826011,"score_spread":0.22722438294413347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084586269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010961004,0.010585914,0.050441753,0.4262675,0.0040859478,0.00023517398,0.00027347708,0.000104212675,0.49704507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82704663,0.009633882,0.034262057,0.044789612,0.00747299,0.00072434114,0.00036598273,0.0001288599,0.07557574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908428,0.0043640654,0.0003186453,0.00124443,0.0021914202,0.0010385205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99080116,0.0048875744,0.00052553567,0.0011469533,0.0019281332,0.00071065145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010169389,0.00061918056,0.00075696246,0.0016810722,0.007886006,0.009636897,0.0026981272,0.011320974,0.022281526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02368032,0.00034902478,0.00096865033,0.0013480111,0.024859095,0.014899266,0.0044172797,0.011235161,0.0016814091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018023651,0.0000031076036,0.000022226619,0.000008209815,9.3171843e-7,0.000019691484,0.00010736376,0.00014257447,0.0000068134295,0.9962203,0.002487052,0.0009799397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006046412,0.000005214347,0.000065299886,0.000075074604,0.0000015897702,0.00004787439,0.00058130955,0.00061677734,0.00002137079,0.96153486,0.037038036,0.0000066025364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011689666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077783754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022281526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015074072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014048151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10937059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084730852","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0060","title":"Bureaucracy without alienation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Bureaucracy; Relevance (law); Statutory law; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Administrative law; Hegelianism; Deliberative democracy; Political philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.025055761804479246,"score_gpt":0.27097926936160094,"score_spread":0.2459235075571217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084730852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013418719,0.0038081247,0.018809298,0.055954456,0.0012361797,0.000057349123,0.00009347415,0.00014891654,0.9064736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7911747,0.0034261208,0.0037227483,0.015227531,0.0013553827,0.0001593681,0.00010415516,0.00019086472,0.18463904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151003,0.002149909,0.0002553218,0.0016658108,0.0027738425,0.0016450867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957918,0.0009752916,0.00039780413,0.0014689566,0.00078144995,0.0005846779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00502683,0.00047742407,0.0005365226,0.001287842,0.010173042,0.0101623405,0.0012299148,0.0036679844,0.009974054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009423372,0.00042105277,0.0006568212,0.0012456991,0.049532697,0.0075505455,0.0069647324,0.006457059,0.0032464557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020537082,0.000002201383,0.00005329609,0.0000070121464,0.0000011023571,0.0000119143515,0.0007038618,0.00003042448,0.000021649992,0.99453694,0.0029452555,0.0016843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017931116,0.000023661174,0.0007859131,0.00016479118,0.000009503891,0.00007674816,0.001558575,0.00023950785,0.00020674057,0.5617539,0.43514818,0.000014489188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026370758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025725227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026370758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010975886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016509421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07963598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085937296","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0040","title":"Office-holding and officiality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Law; Jurisprudence; Orthodoxy; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Subject (documents); Philosophy of law; Private law; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03044656825647138,"score_gpt":0.25779265439418997,"score_spread":0.2273460861377186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085937296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18838848,0.0031499753,0.027135441,0.02978793,0.00067743607,0.000051324612,0.000061162245,0.00012239491,0.7506259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887212,0.00036386907,0.00068334106,0.000620658,0.00011069454,0.000013783142,0.000012934747,0.00002886676,0.009444768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98975694,0.0039993473,0.00038348167,0.00161632,0.00220733,0.002036527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289036,0.002501621,0.0011018629,0.0011327419,0.00095616945,0.0014173297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072654425,0.0002669572,0.0004934199,0.0010912946,0.010311837,0.009645702,0.0011757318,0.002360019,0.0037274698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010098454,0.00030158288,0.00034252866,0.0010553906,0.06550101,0.0074784965,0.007795382,0.005551086,0.00052859046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063510042,0.000009515774,0.0003838935,0.000010434919,0.0000013596278,0.00004399579,0.014976805,0.00004026906,0.00008163328,0.980755,0.0007294578,0.0029613278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030140325,0.00006979502,0.0029255857,0.00022545928,0.000018505838,0.00018631399,0.027991332,0.0003650273,0.0007107184,0.83371687,0.13372096,0.000039329367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01865549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014924643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01865549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007361427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009136263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053411126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087416689","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6416","title":"Discrimination and the Private Law in Canada: Reflections on Spence v. BMO Trust Co.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Law; Legislation; Political science; Sexual orientation; Testamentary trust; Multiculturalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.09651350401140332,"score_gpt":0.3755349907071687,"score_spread":0.27902148669576543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087416689","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042658437,0.045591768,0.00071688,0.71438086,0.0032852488,0.00016151596,0.00061238074,0.00004139434,0.19255154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44103968,0.034523383,0.0018450131,0.40489426,0.0013344733,0.0001371837,0.00023017828,0.00010074645,0.11589519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892771,0.0010449041,0.00025879525,0.0008863792,0.004377791,0.0041550435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921721,0.002568446,0.00032073486,0.00013767956,0.0027516987,0.0020493048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004783453,0.00052791275,0.00060046517,0.0026665537,0.050592903,0.012800113,0.003522056,0.016548777,0.0055811163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008603224,0.00083445833,0.00091110234,0.0039802296,0.019371789,0.004301822,0.004148709,0.015061426,0.00033214447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047491474,0.000098774224,0.004288661,0.0002492318,0.00003399894,0.0017128421,0.0332782,0.000585857,0.0005430195,0.6470475,0.2895603,0.022554126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058444646,0.00004892449,0.015993912,0.00095827517,0.000083630475,0.00035689023,0.034950536,0.0008260859,0.0004888792,0.02809508,0.9178148,0.00032442185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99823076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99927455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2588017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2588017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36987317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85968494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088546058","doi":"","title":"Sprott Bid Structure Ruled Golden: Targets Lose War over Proxy Battle — Central Gold Trust v. Sprott Asset Management","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tender offer; Issuer; Business; Accounting; Commission; Asset (computer security); Corporation; Law; Finance; Law and economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Political science; Shareholder; Computer security","score_opus":0.006214888292619296,"score_gpt":0.25999465709865704,"score_spread":0.25377976880603775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088546058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26305604,0.001629371,0.0032146284,0.035244484,0.0005680369,0.00040465215,0.0008349566,0.00019568652,0.69485205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8118569,0.0006537368,0.0010659171,0.02187583,0.00013873022,0.00008051456,0.0002180209,0.000059501253,0.16405097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992739,0.00034644487,0.00020135262,0.00061167916,0.0039375154,0.0021639727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970606,0.0006390824,0.0001534307,0.00012942888,0.0014555495,0.000561846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026093123,0.0003686949,0.0003519098,0.0009814776,0.008496258,0.0072057825,0.002227883,0.006625487,0.0038397922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062438915,0.00092194206,0.00060492323,0.001153709,0.0040469565,0.0015866093,0.0018855016,0.005924427,0.0006610041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035698904,0.00008805865,0.028351491,0.00018607752,0.00009710009,0.00824382,0.02021531,0.001283105,0.008961961,0.68036145,0.22037208,0.031482458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022350994,0.00033099795,0.070028715,0.00035777397,0.00037605656,0.0020953186,0.014514057,0.004116887,0.011298887,0.02806202,0.8680058,0.00058996043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9500115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9853349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059210647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055204097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4296053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090799164","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0062","title":"Contracts, markets, and justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contract theory; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Sociology; Position (finance); Social contract; Law; Distributive property; Economics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.018782845608439687,"score_gpt":0.2456214040471554,"score_spread":0.22683855843871573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090799164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016665854,0.12968247,0.018218948,0.20821092,0.0022851329,0.000055383793,0.000112552436,0.00006387146,0.6247049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7252082,0.06057187,0.0059543955,0.019283831,0.0022649434,0.000118501106,0.00007313945,0.000086296284,0.18643875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983917,0.0007657485,0.000030664283,0.00013243301,0.00044391345,0.0002354344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986858,0.0008543209,0.00009202841,0.00006661734,0.00015199714,0.0001492124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018538118,0.00032441886,0.0003423579,0.0007840366,0.0033754027,0.0054513584,0.0005253767,0.0027819064,0.0047814627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003469403,0.00023509815,0.00017714585,0.0014009726,0.016417801,0.0046214634,0.0014168264,0.0026590708,0.00058722636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038796384,0.0000031035213,0.000060563736,0.000018942275,0.0000012144225,0.000016104366,0.00055501674,0.00011905032,0.000018957384,0.9802663,0.015685357,0.0032514906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005053815,0.0000091144675,0.00032405485,0.00010856787,0.0000019243369,0.000051746665,0.0011494873,0.00030573335,0.000056243483,0.77449507,0.22348607,0.000007002482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015143594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016314281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015143594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006794957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005867004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049301088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093834217","doi":"10.4324/9781003122609-10","title":"Recovering Misdirected Money from Banks: Ministerial Receipt at Law and in Equity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Equity (law); Business; Economics; Financial system; Law and economics; Monetary economics; Law; Accounting; Political science","score_opus":0.0606704291982241,"score_gpt":0.31152468141192236,"score_spread":0.2508542522136983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093834217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011261006,0.016687203,0.002209789,0.036986798,0.0011327359,0.000019075793,0.000021549387,0.000055780107,0.9316261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51130867,0.00911414,0.0014395957,0.012615167,0.0012170053,0.000055309214,0.000032831278,0.000114655384,0.4641026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983304,0.0007533115,0.00004806294,0.00012751303,0.0004843831,0.00025634607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908924,0.0005208798,0.00009334193,0.00010075292,0.00011044552,0.000085374995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017504,0.00030536085,0.00023881867,0.0008385486,0.0048960526,0.009199237,0.0008348484,0.0028613992,0.0062371553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057478803,0.00025230745,0.00015439399,0.0013551965,0.013481506,0.0064356504,0.0041152025,0.0056939353,0.0015389132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049799014,0.0000061362653,0.0000789916,0.000010889488,4.9689265e-7,0.000054157903,0.0037101333,0.000029256733,0.000026607608,0.9697731,0.019373396,0.0069319108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010674021,0.000014870318,0.00062560214,0.0002517592,0.0000032105265,0.00024017866,0.003483776,0.0002002323,0.0002741062,0.27596533,0.718919,0.000011282801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007590904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012254653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009199237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076756054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039003266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055690646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094153324","doi":"","title":"Il Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: common law e varianti locali nel Commonwealth","year":2015,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commonwealth; Political science","score_opus":0.17861348282601838,"score_gpt":0.3260932734812705,"score_spread":0.1474797906552521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094153324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09019707,0.008588013,0.024890117,0.12838252,0.0040506674,0.001232306,0.0007903307,0.0007393782,0.7411296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42536885,0.0015469482,0.0075330753,0.017733546,0.001796016,0.00038284253,0.0003356904,0.00018323494,0.54511976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99133533,0.0014555078,0.0006248717,0.0018031237,0.0028924155,0.001888726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915023,0.0024109096,0.00064286904,0.00081480877,0.0027542475,0.0018749012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008314858,0.00023492295,0.00037947626,0.0016614405,0.005682142,0.009350629,0.00130753,0.00452789,0.015513293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124697015,0.0004674737,0.0003549048,0.0015163241,0.004390825,0.001999535,0.0045431047,0.005144368,0.0031364663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047642352,0.00011177588,0.010142584,0.00018969562,0.00002815363,0.0012010417,0.008239189,0.00053348235,0.0032101937,0.70069957,0.19258215,0.08301444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029276645,0.00004265296,0.008460679,0.00017684775,0.000015311167,0.00018312567,0.0017437077,0.00054625,0.0006307165,0.018744413,0.9693842,0.000042770553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033648998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05157234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033648998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008598817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021421507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06690627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094427520","doi":"","title":"REFORMING SECTION 89 OF THE INDIAN ACT: TINKER, WAIVER, SOLDIER (ON), SIGH?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Waiver; Parliament; Supreme court; Law; Tinker; Political science; Situated; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; History; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016934770965656605,"score_gpt":0.2710840939394996,"score_spread":0.254149322973843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094427520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09766453,0.0024742582,0.013716216,0.17979984,0.0038442211,0.0002319365,0.00041342576,0.0003913621,0.70146424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71077466,0.0011893254,0.006337297,0.15415709,0.0008155959,0.00021553088,0.00014786063,0.0001357938,0.12622681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919666,0.0017908219,0.00045527,0.00096552237,0.0023071335,0.0025147137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952053,0.0019715296,0.0005749902,0.00059775036,0.0011573954,0.0004929661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008119027,0.0003676372,0.00043305976,0.00075186073,0.0064227968,0.008148468,0.0023283781,0.00896654,0.0048225303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144133,0.0005034726,0.0008780186,0.001002798,0.011735389,0.003584098,0.0033894726,0.011337348,0.0021145712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027625325,0.000035534496,0.0015017282,0.000036607522,0.000008963089,0.00017355787,0.0040764287,0.0001585691,0.0006149674,0.95578504,0.02973994,0.007841024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054271564,0.00016988591,0.009942821,0.00056337274,0.00011420348,0.0005573876,0.0106975045,0.0011849536,0.0032445255,0.15143135,0.8217851,0.00025464062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19141698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20414732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19141698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006606224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022258952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38060564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095154023","doi":"","title":"‘Measure Once, Cut Twice’: Weyerhaeuser Company Ltd. v. Ontario (Attorney General) and the Interpretation of Indemnities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Appeal; Law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); English law; Political science; Business; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.012482452578748781,"score_gpt":0.27426840499478833,"score_spread":0.2617859524160395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095154023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11784834,0.035828847,0.0024859621,0.18928713,0.0011327647,0.00017179642,0.0004966692,0.00006980056,0.6526786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77828413,0.008888821,0.0016394103,0.0845124,0.00033163407,0.000098519144,0.00014199344,0.00007319603,0.12602994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389005,0.00085098046,0.00018118706,0.0006122372,0.0028097131,0.0016559579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980153,0.0008647704,0.00018824456,0.00008935917,0.00061458047,0.00022777898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002786687,0.00044111497,0.00031965616,0.0013535667,0.014801628,0.0077092345,0.0021955841,0.01111308,0.002763456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064580073,0.0006936266,0.00050359545,0.0023887723,0.017252937,0.0032153088,0.00176573,0.005389368,0.0002854028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042736378,0.000018286744,0.0046610213,0.00013127926,0.000022288556,0.002452927,0.051859703,0.00018435926,0.00091783487,0.8226757,0.10352679,0.013507153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055969653,0.000046224286,0.03483321,0.00081069354,0.00009444001,0.0009879537,0.027735192,0.00051635597,0.0013805968,0.049840044,0.8835041,0.00019528696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96681243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078844726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078844726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052732445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5720612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096731131","doi":"10.3138/9781487532314","title":"Corporate Cataclysm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.057510100674922196,"score_gpt":0.24779631201189425,"score_spread":0.19028621133697204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096731131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00093459815,0.00492009,0.0005016938,0.019610664,0.0021581175,0.000016856779,0.00004778737,0.00007586958,0.9717344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068138294,0.003625217,0.0003623416,0.015707873,0.0014943442,0.000078636534,0.00010948173,0.00014874327,0.910335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709344,0.0005837423,0.00005970257,0.00039247345,0.0014845415,0.0003861143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800843,0.00069689413,0.00009483293,0.00025057787,0.00072815473,0.0002211886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016143864,0.00064163865,0.00030047397,0.0014302003,0.011292449,0.016798945,0.0011358864,0.0041517937,0.03477504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005552262,0.00031723888,0.00022646137,0.0019223391,0.0103545785,0.005641628,0.0036352857,0.0061485064,0.009561494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044602803,0.0000073396895,0.00006793495,0.000028806346,9.346688e-7,0.00006530381,0.0031890522,0.000026928345,0.00005992729,0.67131525,0.31532457,0.009909424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016035475,0.0000024433648,0.000070310016,0.0000550557,7.400384e-7,0.000048477443,0.00078022096,0.00003334756,0.000045643737,0.011536693,0.9874227,0.0000027760163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06532031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07812328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06532031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015832992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0103724925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12988019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099602470","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.5","title":"Kantian Perspectives on Private Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Kantian ethics; Law; Epistemology; Private law; Philosophy of law; Morality; Adjudication; Natural (archaeology); Natural law; Independence (probability theory); Positive law; Philosophy; Political science; Virtue; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.049287639518884575,"score_gpt":0.3346212654521303,"score_spread":0.2853336259332457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099602470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074587194,0.013443677,0.044519056,0.041495293,0.00066087046,0.000028926455,0.00018227748,0.000102280384,0.892109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.757279,0.01712953,0.024435166,0.015620069,0.003102858,0.0002489801,0.00027344876,0.00021227456,0.1816987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553466,0.0019787308,0.00012544975,0.00053759606,0.0012742013,0.00054931757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825484,0.000968807,0.00011927745,0.00024548033,0.0002542264,0.00015746412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034558696,0.0006087506,0.00052927586,0.0018632351,0.0052073374,0.007292325,0.0012455389,0.004952582,0.008130698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028568709,0.00038857362,0.000624567,0.001686762,0.026841523,0.008918706,0.0032893224,0.007246678,0.0020394614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0072116e-7,0.0000014570422,0.000004431398,0.0000028764548,3.4578295e-7,0.0000031114946,0.000117786665,0.000052749492,0.00000527785,0.99880886,0.0006256871,0.00037688066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019152294,0.0000020867183,0.000026515763,0.000021957092,8.9284833e-7,0.000010765561,0.000099203055,0.00015010475,0.000023329754,0.9654731,0.03418728,0.0000027930835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003923416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030818544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009047266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009047266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004287194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06564283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106125075","doi":"","title":"Arbitration as Ius Gentium: A Scholastic Theory of Arbitration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Scholasticism; Law; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Natural (archaeology); Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02087825030984097,"score_gpt":0.2924313493908887,"score_spread":0.27155309908104774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106125075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03763667,0.0054067154,0.38645843,0.03261935,0.00048687827,0.00011625777,0.00011858772,0.00012019426,0.5370369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490502,0.0021001159,0.022556597,0.0019226109,0.0005027858,0.00016711492,0.000058022895,0.00005317898,0.023589319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351245,0.003212308,0.00032017822,0.0006990762,0.0016410612,0.000614975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948172,0.0028553542,0.00068958825,0.00061680295,0.0007803428,0.00024074814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010040139,0.00044553788,0.0006004405,0.0016070197,0.0037619865,0.008681142,0.0014887481,0.0031130915,0.0056429203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010290291,0.0002936563,0.0009863742,0.0014171078,0.027300905,0.011016879,0.0053411503,0.004172782,0.0008069147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000115259,0.0000013104371,0.000025636875,0.0000042277316,9.187041e-7,0.000004697208,0.00021661948,0.00009249044,0.000010665973,0.99908984,0.00015386425,0.0003986783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062658337,0.0000054037178,0.000072367235,0.000024657498,0.00000298053,0.000017298691,0.00012193068,0.0013124256,0.0000628861,0.98621273,0.012156343,0.0000047389235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033463433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002031275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010040139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005396102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039722663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053097963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106701806","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850397.003.0023","title":"Mandatory Family Protection in the Common Law Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Abandonment (legal); Spouse; Law; Common law; Political science; Family law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Discretion; Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.08384297433496068,"score_gpt":0.2922736159509626,"score_spread":0.2084306416160019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106701806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22208992,0.004311963,0.007989783,0.051097117,0.00038250594,0.00008270425,0.00011976372,0.000064531814,0.71386164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96593314,0.00040823038,0.0008222991,0.00442054,0.00013825811,0.0000381161,0.00002046178,0.0000127953535,0.028206093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399686,0.001954603,0.0002493016,0.0010879394,0.0012262275,0.0014850525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884294,0.005401957,0.0011169015,0.0019300483,0.0017598799,0.0013616721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006929848,0.00015898283,0.0002861229,0.00088421826,0.0069383555,0.005099509,0.0016349917,0.0040798816,0.007891271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014450949,0.00039777128,0.00029607196,0.00078729825,0.02687359,0.004581904,0.005585053,0.005627311,0.00049948576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119071665,0.000030303305,0.0009355505,0.000021278138,0.000003434219,0.00015693594,0.0072340597,0.00015213073,0.00014676651,0.9792184,0.0038303062,0.008258838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000744096,0.00018444966,0.015565638,0.001330058,0.00003419026,0.0006004261,0.008009893,0.0015970524,0.00078949216,0.45944145,0.51225865,0.00011418032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097566485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1096179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097566485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014755806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015498008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19399714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106859394","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0067","title":"Ownership and offices: the building blocks of the legal order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legitimacy; Order (exchange); Possession (linguistics); Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Property rights; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0216388014336906,"score_gpt":0.24339178786570423,"score_spread":0.22175298643201363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106859394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053177107,0.0049370974,0.059616506,0.034234945,0.00034863813,0.000102047925,0.00019226268,0.00018197666,0.8472094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547494,0.0015923554,0.008426002,0.0019258794,0.00035021297,0.0000982568,0.00007110144,0.0000775502,0.032709133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953629,0.001795677,0.00021390438,0.0006263504,0.0011214027,0.0008796817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957818,0.0021415416,0.00051542633,0.0007384409,0.0003341205,0.0004887126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031124388,0.00027740028,0.00042970196,0.0011607357,0.005947471,0.010009364,0.0010727328,0.0034232035,0.007491274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007348372,0.00052334205,0.00042780678,0.0011894867,0.06494138,0.011155707,0.0055242926,0.004352938,0.001015124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025447796,0.0000017546668,0.000083151084,0.000005747462,5.1072965e-7,0.000017725833,0.0011855698,0.00005094634,0.000023519671,0.99673754,0.0006409726,0.0012499848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016136006,0.000017651815,0.00094113895,0.00009552525,0.0000047041376,0.00008195243,0.001717723,0.00044226996,0.00016753041,0.91170496,0.08479641,0.000014110952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029348578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023618711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029348578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065920884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008076594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05835551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107289713","doi":"10.4324/9781003122616-4","title":"The Reason for Restitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0694969736757026,"score_gpt":0.33487833336941486,"score_spread":0.26538135969371224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107289713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024793057,0.014181187,0.014587682,0.053005762,0.004305234,0.000077717465,0.00014074896,0.00023588711,0.8886727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6316671,0.0062782723,0.003598085,0.02242739,0.0024076304,0.00020517113,0.00014910795,0.0004825807,0.33278468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930981,0.0015757991,0.0004018427,0.0011576331,0.0024137653,0.0013528671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664116,0.0016306726,0.0003190118,0.00065268466,0.0005382154,0.00021824743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005132207,0.0005360837,0.0006248138,0.001218744,0.0045971875,0.008757835,0.0028977562,0.007973762,0.015619671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01060453,0.0004526141,0.00091279723,0.0010982979,0.018460713,0.008512663,0.005147724,0.009048241,0.004537979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011922976,0.0000083126715,0.00024564945,0.0000367132,0.000003862453,0.00033518663,0.0028837952,0.00005611072,0.00016510034,0.9728538,0.015489552,0.007909991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016013724,0.000033268756,0.0008788054,0.0006305099,0.000019175863,0.0019268072,0.0058129434,0.00039294365,0.0010513435,0.24908857,0.74010575,0.0000438816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003788728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029478706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015619671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048883692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004213989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052253008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108520199","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0100","title":"The question of fairness in contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; State (computer science); Political science; Law enforcement; Rule of law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016863510070994417,"score_gpt":0.27115745184663353,"score_spread":0.25429394177563913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108520199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03603137,0.05431497,0.14638753,0.24888489,0.003928625,0.00017427123,0.00017986393,0.00009946348,0.5099991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181651,0.014312329,0.020707555,0.014906728,0.0055969153,0.00022125675,0.00007256061,0.000127119,0.025890464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96362686,0.018866656,0.0013958162,0.0040478855,0.008974689,0.003088065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641533,0.02579774,0.0018369694,0.0032763998,0.0037124562,0.0012231207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036365602,0.0005869206,0.0014690659,0.0021606146,0.0097002275,0.014309946,0.003191245,0.009912485,0.003968178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06448492,0.000575016,0.0009947248,0.0029441367,0.057196774,0.016842198,0.004977891,0.009324762,0.00094684644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039602783,0.0000029667028,0.00006258838,0.000013158921,0.0000027664341,0.0000136335375,0.00040918172,0.00012008978,0.000011695675,0.9965322,0.00084715395,0.0019805103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057406896,0.000005884139,0.00007252024,0.000059292965,0.0000030703734,0.000020641555,0.00018131158,0.00028150677,0.000028844164,0.98867303,0.010663333,0.0000048071634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013887725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050617224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036365602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013002266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015329816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19232196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108774314","doi":"10.1017/lst.2020.38","title":"An analysis of three distinct approaches to using defamation to protect corporate reputation from Australia, England and Wales, and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Welsh; Disadvantage; Law; Corporate law; English law; Political science; Business; Corporate governance; History; Finance","score_opus":0.3751401205529468,"score_gpt":0.34647645570874536,"score_spread":0.028663664844201464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108774314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8225855,0.0032169311,0.0010503528,0.0075665405,0.000060071765,0.0003670585,0.00029516502,0.000017869916,0.16484044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806189,0.0015111092,0.0009078629,0.0013779429,0.000010769758,0.00007296714,0.000109696164,0.000011223881,0.015379623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892426,0.0015038699,0.00025924196,0.0003886672,0.004673374,0.0039323815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98030704,0.0055495338,0.0014679859,0.00044306004,0.009201607,0.0030307441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004048629,0.00033557098,0.0004902504,0.0045738816,0.011346405,0.005900554,0.0018198799,0.0015094401,0.0031300755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018265553,0.00040186584,0.00062466285,0.005382201,0.0046123187,0.0012981854,0.003187311,0.0029269923,0.00013873783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005259931,0.000459614,0.23413563,0.00094468077,0.00033470604,0.0034466633,0.09157322,0.0040896176,0.0028193735,0.5249371,0.018064385,0.11866896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012404803,0.00039604073,0.6666692,0.0011468088,0.0006457405,0.0009150712,0.13642393,0.0053899814,0.0023952767,0.012520388,0.1730092,0.00036424157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9863668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99520916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10258383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10258383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11119563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7443013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109455559","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0068","title":"Private law offices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Representation (politics); Private law; Commercial law; Business; Identity (music); Task (project management); Political science; Public law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.022886487446781616,"score_gpt":0.2503122336098992,"score_spread":0.22742574616311756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109455559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024432808,0.0020286336,0.009785897,0.010032831,0.00026244696,0.000102814534,0.00017552836,0.00012458986,0.9530544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7170013,0.0015250399,0.0032535344,0.0030678194,0.00032437904,0.0001156092,0.00011484766,0.00006387713,0.27453354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431276,0.0012752849,0.00020677295,0.0008790361,0.001531883,0.00179433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955695,0.0011764143,0.0006304078,0.0006954494,0.0006824881,0.0012457032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019327308,0.00023207375,0.00030899225,0.0008032527,0.007158104,0.009430012,0.0011649672,0.0027686767,0.02537998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055649537,0.0004227772,0.0002588609,0.0008378461,0.011069843,0.006398608,0.005009697,0.0024254587,0.0042787082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070907804,0.000010535218,0.0005631825,0.000021872136,0.0000011231556,0.00008919216,0.002680633,0.000045707948,0.00009751512,0.97507983,0.009308119,0.012095167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013973354,0.000037550228,0.002055407,0.00021216822,0.000007735771,0.00026334927,0.0052158576,0.00022224715,0.0002842712,0.100612074,0.89105856,0.00001680733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016388353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025582379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02537998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005890298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0101234475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08490449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110898537","doi":"10.28933/ajlls-2020-02-0505","title":"APPROPRIATION OF PERSONALITY IN THE COMMONWEALTH CARIBBEAN","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law and Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Appropriation; Jurisprudence; Law; Tort; German; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0764802303310552,"score_gpt":0.3708515025709782,"score_spread":0.294371272239923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110898537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.322991,0.0017366913,0.00083438377,0.013621409,0.000068685185,0.00004838777,0.000027371438,0.000012664375,0.66065943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96745646,0.0012955264,0.00027844132,0.0023814146,0.000021359985,0.00002696334,0.000008680964,0.0000057331667,0.028525403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703074,0.00085987983,0.00008015003,0.00016786625,0.00071860413,0.0011428073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734914,0.0008222462,0.00031875775,0.00030350068,0.0006525528,0.0005537148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016355732,0.00017467636,0.00018919517,0.0017351444,0.013559624,0.0055106715,0.00066377455,0.0017262717,0.0030989468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005151303,0.00021063529,0.00018186044,0.0014691645,0.010990378,0.0016705666,0.0077475593,0.0023991924,0.00015169983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020866168,0.00003783098,0.014037014,0.000046366124,0.000010088902,0.0034073468,0.099952176,0.0002041758,0.0014183251,0.8233927,0.0076814233,0.049791675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020350752,0.000092064336,0.07153384,0.00080784195,0.000047694797,0.0026481566,0.11404446,0.0007887311,0.0014046994,0.073416024,0.7350546,0.00014155525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43705422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6226069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43705422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011795116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011958573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8690206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110964295","doi":"","title":"Transparency and Accountability in Governance in China: Evaluating Legal Reforms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; China; Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.05132374386409874,"score_gpt":0.3215810646158894,"score_spread":0.27025732075179065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110964295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6505596,0.022886015,0.004075864,0.011364412,0.00031877734,0.0006806007,0.00070225284,0.0000754601,0.30933708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839025,0.006245222,0.0014945547,0.00031023924,0.00007588621,0.00014811792,0.00022257939,0.000008326473,0.0075925924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949379,0.0021666365,0.00015505674,0.00020526501,0.001879411,0.0006558065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582255,0.0018628797,0.00058165216,0.00017740519,0.0012885707,0.00026689365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006573718,0.00056496786,0.00071053056,0.003796345,0.0014425444,0.003378818,0.00061161304,0.0008999844,0.002676797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00817162,0.00016746341,0.0004626353,0.010515646,0.002616363,0.0033654722,0.0012991212,0.0011819077,0.000116082614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002457775,0.00034201218,0.07957309,0.0012009798,0.00020535394,0.00040161604,0.005615644,0.035080627,0.00080018566,0.6347001,0.019437598,0.22239695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029485545,0.0016093628,0.53977823,0.002491615,0.0007538379,0.00013171142,0.021339277,0.11040521,0.0052856407,0.21101417,0.106625445,0.000270668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16732465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24709374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16732465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025261145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02344874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33270144},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3113173929","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2020-0110","title":"Taking tort seriously","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.029116114515872076,"score_gpt":0.2620778172179014,"score_spread":0.23296170270202934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113173929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003829347,0.15525526,0.013282231,0.42044964,0.012900822,0.000042687483,0.00015210816,0.00017213772,0.39391583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26466382,0.089471824,0.00712854,0.38586748,0.02444723,0.0001710034,0.00028267328,0.0003098387,0.22765759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526405,0.0016934562,0.0002190697,0.00088266906,0.0015151415,0.0004256833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961218,0.0021809514,0.0002621389,0.00036860528,0.00080460944,0.00026174722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037262286,0.0008743665,0.00067701,0.001857242,0.005513414,0.010232638,0.0014768062,0.014252889,0.015216154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008633732,0.00032756774,0.0010436539,0.0009537402,0.013209347,0.012686415,0.0047902497,0.012429503,0.0030139734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003847589,0.0000066780053,0.00013577663,0.00008098575,0.0000059271883,0.000076414944,0.0011188275,0.00012746705,0.000060092305,0.9263951,0.05790684,0.014082055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027931135,0.000012399006,0.00029719458,0.00044149286,0.000008777065,0.00018038359,0.0012076761,0.0001640539,0.00010965041,0.2846863,0.71287847,0.000010850639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009536222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012127713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015216154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006181505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005113062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050903082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113760480","doi":"","title":"A Generalized Duty of Good Faith in Insolvency Proceedings: Effective or Meaningless?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Insolvency; Legislation; Law; Statutory law; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Fair dealing; Faith; Creditor; Law and economics; Meaning (existential); Business; Good faith; Economics; Debt; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01888511851589504,"score_gpt":0.29487733513939424,"score_spread":0.2759922166234992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113760480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019535061,0.0067365533,0.081889816,0.4278529,0.0063691353,0.0002800102,0.00014107069,0.00039184582,0.4568035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8076775,0.004289291,0.028864501,0.10496784,0.00595226,0.0006901243,0.00015606756,0.000510459,0.046891924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9398708,0.031126807,0.0048857783,0.005296906,0.014642302,0.004177318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92101586,0.04481527,0.004971322,0.01641315,0.009426214,0.0033581366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056663472,0.00068265316,0.0013732387,0.0024607223,0.008252715,0.03163353,0.0046399958,0.018316215,0.007923213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11302819,0.0013500912,0.0011565865,0.0018182573,0.0826221,0.044862073,0.013560613,0.021088917,0.0034458076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058687897,0.000014882153,0.00009789678,0.00003977372,0.000004060898,0.00003954833,0.0034574405,0.00006544801,0.00007115067,0.98254746,0.005997159,0.007659241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041156505,0.000039920735,0.00036032771,0.000709368,0.0000205711,0.00013350103,0.0040745237,0.00031510348,0.00030168184,0.85547733,0.13846561,0.000060940507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004202218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00511037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056663472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009247828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016822541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29966867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114377619","doi":"10.29173/mlj798","title":"Unsettled Estates: Manitoba's Forgotten Statute and the Chupryk Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; History; Genealogy; Political science","score_opus":0.04643382559597244,"score_gpt":0.2751377337092125,"score_spread":0.22870390811324007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114377619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43434486,0.004989366,0.002165981,0.1304622,0.0006591169,0.00014623783,0.00034410704,0.000059436097,0.42682868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82814366,0.0014305878,0.00066149613,0.041488487,0.00009838903,0.0000966528,0.00006384231,0.000060018694,0.12795687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973556,0.00043737318,0.00005014329,0.00024994012,0.0003945565,0.0015122979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763024,0.00088891765,0.00017220151,0.00015768317,0.00039146986,0.0007593851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024186599,0.0003332575,0.0006885382,0.00097502244,0.027827006,0.0136391185,0.0031247386,0.011582891,0.009330354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052728336,0.0010503873,0.0005417304,0.001647729,0.016255036,0.0039731096,0.009191188,0.01602538,0.0007450659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085362575,0.000083184044,0.011241682,0.000058944035,0.00003353019,0.004128136,0.023751464,0.0005837808,0.0005430319,0.91018224,0.040457822,0.008850826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002526465,0.00014982035,0.046535537,0.0013153703,0.00026328568,0.0022689686,0.1547461,0.002388789,0.0015162058,0.1661585,0.6240763,0.000328417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8426429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9608804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1573571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03274795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06812574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31656754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115069690","doi":"","title":"Good faith in contractual performance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review: Selected Conference Papers: Journal of the Judicial Commission of New South Wales, The","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fair dealing; Doctrine; Law; Duty; Faith; Political science; Estoppel; Common law; Good faith; Bad faith; Uniform Commercial Code; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03643751600118068,"score_gpt":0.29711086956012617,"score_spread":0.2606733535589455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115069690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020755373,0.069837905,0.045901015,0.07087024,0.0020453143,0.0002821772,0.00011588479,0.00007317082,0.7901188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89740145,0.021790607,0.01121389,0.015992401,0.0016902307,0.0002819048,0.000089806475,0.000059711205,0.05148004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96830565,0.01473315,0.0019666231,0.0025172536,0.009929373,0.0025479333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97243553,0.016834358,0.0018541882,0.0035833071,0.0041545033,0.0011382216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02364133,0.00034771473,0.00060766976,0.0018467729,0.005367556,0.010447679,0.0015465933,0.004810949,0.0027517958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04431846,0.00046458555,0.00042334586,0.0021513219,0.04545247,0.0074686953,0.004536041,0.0071332455,0.00078147475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023745467,0.00000437056,0.00010269377,0.000034520417,0.00000255829,0.000026189718,0.0009956654,0.00010758408,0.000027488082,0.9909306,0.002346945,0.005418977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007729239,0.00003090732,0.0008223933,0.0005653587,0.000007369126,0.00014351413,0.0011646148,0.00025581985,0.00020659964,0.78171784,0.21505113,0.000026633536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009666454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006801525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02364133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00580342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012805188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12502879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115152292","doi":"","title":"Moore v Sweet: Four Lessons in Unjust Enrichment from the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Constructive trust; Element (criminal law); Statute; Constructive; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.07967098125673334,"score_gpt":0.3047506684458837,"score_spread":0.2250796871891504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115152292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038402338,0.014723153,0.0041359314,0.6136292,0.0015693429,0.00012952229,0.00048083757,0.00011137932,0.32681826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7018789,0.010838929,0.005560569,0.21974164,0.00083674275,0.00010235959,0.00018922609,0.00010595476,0.06074572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99020386,0.0010025889,0.0002553714,0.00097257824,0.0048575494,0.0027081019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935283,0.0026816693,0.0001966803,0.00025072182,0.0023218195,0.0010207626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070475265,0.00049207895,0.00085643464,0.0015668396,0.023429211,0.01214309,0.0034175033,0.012001836,0.004729422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014982131,0.0006390215,0.00069468113,0.0024659846,0.019624522,0.0047932835,0.0044146213,0.017923128,0.00029550205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002752968,0.000016322372,0.0007590573,0.000055057233,0.000014664486,0.0005984534,0.0032185856,0.00040776643,0.00028881815,0.9075449,0.07556352,0.01150519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001559328,0.000044593846,0.008561231,0.0009973485,0.00015369868,0.0003967118,0.011512501,0.002728243,0.0014542694,0.3733143,0.60022706,0.00045409985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99377006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092140816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092140816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19801731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66853154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115194936","doi":"10.1093/owc/9780199537983.003.0028","title":"The Judge’s House","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Annuity; History; Economics; Finance; Archaeology; Pension; Life annuity","score_opus":0.04028548418522459,"score_gpt":0.23917482662968426,"score_spread":0.19888934244445966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115194936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005606009,0.004208834,0.0003219887,0.01632241,0.005052694,0.000022552347,0.00012301035,0.00006459043,0.9733233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053026075,0.0009140942,0.00011235526,0.005261764,0.00041313982,0.000009910046,0.000046292967,0.000044490353,0.98789525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992711,0.00009518002,0.000021441303,0.00011623105,0.00032619605,0.0001699386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993339,0.00011731125,0.00001737264,0.00004460338,0.00033552156,0.00015125218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058933353,0.00039095533,0.00033828826,0.0007243137,0.0067944517,0.0045148283,0.000747319,0.003272665,0.13608429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027678197,0.000358992,0.00036831005,0.00056370406,0.0012142411,0.002780211,0.0013803671,0.0059624533,0.041259624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050213853,0.000006039977,0.000040365267,0.000012735336,6.5287827e-7,0.00007627602,0.00023793317,0.000014441267,0.000040732404,0.060056325,0.92806983,0.011439614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011658592,0.0000023369155,0.00007796404,0.000035916626,5.854297e-7,0.00003455488,0.00013878009,0.000013669191,0.000023440323,0.0018696813,0.99779946,0.0000024082246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022276338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07635337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13608429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028518983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032852665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45524728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116251863","doi":"","title":"A.R.Buck, The Making ofAustralian Property Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Property law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Property rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042552738064311965,"score_gpt":0.3288249408967122,"score_spread":0.28627220283240024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116251863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009156378,0.10439717,0.0018914053,0.4302486,0.0023972117,0.000066868706,0.00061131496,0.00009607337,0.45113495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2677146,0.059874445,0.0034193944,0.09664558,0.00087906636,0.00012131885,0.0002576376,0.00016205946,0.57092595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990244,0.00018935598,0.000036948106,0.00016690792,0.00028268446,0.00029971453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906784,0.0004030949,0.000058660058,0.000041480263,0.00026666053,0.00016227979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014166996,0.00037986462,0.00022710876,0.0007595652,0.010936074,0.0053816983,0.0011221964,0.007134225,0.020058045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031102838,0.00046266578,0.00028701604,0.00094901095,0.00796105,0.007979818,0.0015057335,0.0055374224,0.0017611102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002055307,0.000033825134,0.0010927753,0.000068416026,0.0000063277826,0.00018925847,0.0032093632,0.00014295206,0.00019685323,0.61812276,0.35708514,0.019831793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018848714,0.000012364483,0.0060070567,0.00030539578,0.00000908998,0.00010913466,0.005267552,0.00019692352,0.00034009758,0.07901928,0.9086806,0.00003361345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6068128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8323805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6068128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017760074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015288203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79100555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119284486","doi":"10.5040/9781509934782.ch-008","title":"Revisiting Injurious Falsehood","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.047854208381757135,"score_gpt":0.29293539064318397,"score_spread":0.24508118226142683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119284486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0631932,0.058640007,0.08326654,0.14925337,0.0073767956,0.00010940399,0.00022316967,0.00018748625,0.6377501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89601165,0.020095395,0.010174718,0.02722591,0.0020731455,0.000045824752,0.00008299786,0.0001457572,0.044144716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986527,0.002974993,0.00057198876,0.0010352526,0.0069533237,0.0019373979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98197985,0.01009529,0.0009265504,0.001181256,0.005425725,0.00039126351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0100751,0.000678396,0.00081270037,0.004163246,0.011870385,0.010341755,0.0034358616,0.0065820073,0.0040349416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024771905,0.00067723327,0.0010198088,0.0021992181,0.049647685,0.01561465,0.0067200447,0.012586418,0.0005306534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003619205,0.000003252115,0.0002707337,0.000038285765,0.0000028481086,0.00025988775,0.006048792,0.00015157714,0.00007042501,0.9865122,0.0023431333,0.0042952145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007746789,0.000021118893,0.0014035011,0.00091608224,0.00003221058,0.0009001929,0.009254335,0.0009451356,0.0006982611,0.61156785,0.37417278,0.00008080396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35164663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31192398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35164663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03367305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02052134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6991997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120641221","doi":"","title":"A TROJAN HORSE: CAN INDIAN SELF-GOVERNMENT BE PROMOTED THROUGH THE INDIAN ACT?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Indigenous; Parliament; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Treaty of Waitangi; Law; Government (linguistics); Population; Legislation; Supreme court; Politics; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.025476564129801493,"score_gpt":0.29273182412458415,"score_spread":0.26725525999478267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120641221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012630503,0.027890667,0.0012377633,0.42691752,0.002655171,0.00009529899,0.00027424376,0.0000779587,0.52822095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54020405,0.030584754,0.0032017017,0.21698655,0.0026403335,0.00016777139,0.00021751583,0.000100904326,0.20589648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361986,0.00089958665,0.0001546245,0.00067979685,0.002629676,0.002016448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958468,0.0016803471,0.00019152365,0.00020274102,0.0016504443,0.00042812616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004696562,0.00037339816,0.0004511446,0.0020730984,0.014484202,0.014022694,0.0026488288,0.010225378,0.005351879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106356535,0.00038306476,0.0006035716,0.002332722,0.026045877,0.004671222,0.0020348674,0.010851893,0.0009795869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005873305,0.0000087338985,0.00031056497,0.000057673096,0.0000031601812,0.00009287869,0.0029590363,0.00007135654,0.00009048348,0.9321964,0.057314966,0.006888815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019956702,0.000020643203,0.0047033927,0.00093721173,0.00004132223,0.0001068379,0.009044084,0.00044580668,0.00038072746,0.106999144,0.8772054,0.00009554592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92741644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9389783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072583556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04629893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10298533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3359238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121197602","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2841","title":"Anti-Social Behaviour, Expulsion from Condominium, and the Reconstruction of Ownership","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Business; Law; Land tenure; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.026973672686895045,"score_gpt":0.2843780672776272,"score_spread":0.25740439459073217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121197602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173569,0.0008433374,0.0011227439,0.0023546058,0.00002786378,0.00002898989,0.00006853362,0.000012579509,0.078184456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962224,0.00022019976,0.0001555388,0.0001212833,0.000006873474,0.0000038980506,0.000019530873,0.0000015790516,0.003248701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966336,0.00039584254,0.00009948614,0.0002441406,0.0015288519,0.0010981797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643457,0.0009243198,0.0014527258,0.00029912064,0.0005634224,0.00032586904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001511286,0.00013414331,0.00012816708,0.0013211747,0.005520315,0.0023723035,0.001177915,0.0010713526,0.002202851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007197123,0.00017826213,0.00021820543,0.0011826257,0.013031445,0.0018955221,0.002436699,0.0013702178,0.00010445898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007551464,0.00007433532,0.30549395,0.00013539991,0.000047751833,0.006040354,0.14062004,0.0016006443,0.0031503695,0.45489058,0.007313738,0.08055727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015826248,0.00010027827,0.7213109,0.00038929636,0.000065000575,0.0030319353,0.13146803,0.0019061392,0.0023112595,0.017810762,0.12149369,0.0000968214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6184151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8100475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6184151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013811216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010415752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7676642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121276650","doi":"","title":"Legal Personality and the Canadian REIT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Real estate investment trust; Duty; Duty of loyalty; Trust law; Business; Personality; Investment (military); Law; Real estate; Economic Justice; Estate; Accounting; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Finance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01818099225505582,"score_gpt":0.3071642247463786,"score_spread":0.2889832324913228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121276650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19724089,0.003317721,0.0015904275,0.1034014,0.0006047558,0.00008671783,0.0005211383,0.000067566056,0.69316936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92364424,0.0009429196,0.00056245184,0.011017047,0.0000729751,0.000026634558,0.00008093654,0.000024456538,0.06362837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99383354,0.0004904698,0.00012565398,0.00040657652,0.0025183556,0.0026252994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927544,0.00078657636,0.000538838,0.00030240283,0.0032652845,0.0023524906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035701597,0.00029477384,0.0003090205,0.001912603,0.023178812,0.007566778,0.0015960899,0.0031053186,0.007894001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014101345,0.0004955416,0.00044751973,0.0019501194,0.0137789035,0.0020193704,0.0042194347,0.0057653063,0.0004912447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064089414,0.00003822599,0.021457328,0.0000567199,0.000026761732,0.0009208353,0.022738507,0.00021010624,0.0004241627,0.8685038,0.059043296,0.026516197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108011045,0.000078779005,0.1199824,0.0006343623,0.00011494088,0.0011298171,0.032460358,0.0011590479,0.0010451582,0.073176116,0.7698163,0.00029477608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98600525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085065976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085065976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10836982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6171998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121457708","doi":"","title":"The Assumption of Risk Defence in Torts (Common Law) and Extra-Contractual Liability (Québec Civil Law) in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Delict; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal liability; Liability; Tort; Strict liability; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Private law; Economics; Business; Commercial law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.006120081997065048,"score_gpt":0.24026851063416532,"score_spread":0.23414842863710028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121457708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8687136,0.0022191626,0.0022467417,0.013820603,0.000054907232,0.000078067715,0.00026961233,0.000016982252,0.11258021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683017,0.000382696,0.00031042055,0.00039568846,0.000005436061,0.0000075243915,0.000030216028,0.0000026210598,0.002035124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908325,0.0018473577,0.00029975324,0.00070843304,0.0027302646,0.0035816913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811887,0.008559389,0.002320742,0.00058357825,0.0059511983,0.0013963978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066152015,0.00023888722,0.0005747558,0.0027837218,0.011326188,0.0067603984,0.0022982354,0.0022209394,0.00440865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022902055,0.00033132886,0.00066532684,0.0029249485,0.010698778,0.0022493952,0.0022717835,0.0030406003,0.00012928087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023190299,0.0001513146,0.07083244,0.0001718938,0.000106101055,0.0010459584,0.01963824,0.008653885,0.00078812626,0.86235225,0.0050807837,0.030947084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021108463,0.00041931216,0.6027231,0.0014219916,0.00048462427,0.00092568365,0.11195716,0.04440887,0.0022501482,0.13726981,0.09730355,0.0006246636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99474335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99573344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16198073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16198073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10654205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97198355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121512377","doi":"","title":"Keeping It Private: The Impossibility to Abandon Ownership and the horror vacui of the Common Law of Property","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Abandonment (legal); Impossibility; Common law; Law; Doctrine; Private law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Common ownership; Civil law (Civil law); Property law; Normative; Business; Political science; Public law; Economics; Property rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027809995967756698,"score_gpt":0.2915883705095085,"score_spread":0.2637783745417518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121512377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26739103,0.0032838506,0.05501571,0.07377771,0.0004349866,0.00009232509,0.00012159445,0.00010104779,0.59978175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899414,0.00027014015,0.0010552562,0.0011934652,0.000072128154,0.000030487143,0.00001221514,0.000031442945,0.0073933993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99200374,0.0036035962,0.00044436663,0.0013170708,0.0015027461,0.0011283625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98495066,0.008332225,0.0015215422,0.0023746793,0.0022679574,0.00055288477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00850611,0.0002937274,0.00061568746,0.00085861416,0.006707808,0.009431451,0.0017957696,0.004881151,0.0041456805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01519751,0.0005693899,0.00060490187,0.00076718966,0.06307194,0.010187775,0.0046838606,0.0075905337,0.00045232405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071225923,0.000006045384,0.00020955686,0.0000088783545,0.0000026533276,0.00010922422,0.0038255388,0.000129923,0.000060380065,0.9941245,0.0007953635,0.0007209032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020524834,0.000019525087,0.0009992069,0.00013653898,0.000014487939,0.00018641783,0.0049415054,0.0017912282,0.0003141168,0.95867497,0.032864694,0.00003684428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03942362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02703624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03942362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010252481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048206085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07838827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121512595","doi":"","title":"Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co. - The Unofficial Death of the Independent Wrong Requirement and Official Birth of Punitive Damages in Contract","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Damages; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02316460974970285,"score_gpt":0.3044423928061502,"score_spread":0.28127778305644735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121512595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1393961,0.008865461,0.0051142396,0.07172908,0.0016703203,0.00026127024,0.0006548181,0.00011685641,0.77219194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7891658,0.0029131987,0.002040694,0.03601285,0.00037595385,0.00012514423,0.0001585551,0.00004726794,0.16916074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922506,0.00067360513,0.00020842988,0.00083702133,0.0044497433,0.0015805473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684215,0.0013620427,0.0003026047,0.00016207554,0.0009483125,0.00038296636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031008243,0.0003418861,0.00026562077,0.0008967381,0.011951838,0.006742508,0.0011405336,0.0069102193,0.0024066407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009030635,0.00066928286,0.00042021953,0.0009670583,0.007332119,0.0019847155,0.0021240371,0.006305383,0.00029798204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061164596,0.000038681534,0.0055451714,0.000064511194,0.000017538378,0.0019463287,0.006403854,0.0004391091,0.0013874682,0.89552647,0.064367644,0.02420204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008326435,0.00015744014,0.044542108,0.00062067737,0.0000951639,0.0018977755,0.0069520823,0.003084915,0.005562414,0.08815073,0.84844524,0.0004082466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8462698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94909656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8462698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028825821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039903138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3092711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121667437","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002381","title":"Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Toward a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Duty; Law; Doctrine; Legislation; Freedom of contract; Service (business); Race (biology); Public law; Political science; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025356954900259115,"score_gpt":0.3312106010967158,"score_spread":0.30585364619645666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121667437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08796355,0.0018943183,0.067290604,0.19290803,0.0007089978,0.00019079725,0.00006402962,0.000053699325,0.648926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633762,0.000427853,0.0071687307,0.009927983,0.00022253547,0.000100722245,0.000021349464,0.00002284076,0.018731792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765622,0.0076875472,0.0008866524,0.00253973,0.008294177,0.0040297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828394,0.0077125835,0.0015130743,0.002484405,0.0026978534,0.0027528037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021674117,0.000399164,0.00080054766,0.0020235386,0.0146739725,0.0152210295,0.00249056,0.013271734,0.0032018225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031205213,0.0005962808,0.00083571876,0.0012641276,0.119571656,0.010661842,0.011388096,0.010793346,0.00062955666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022851527,0.000005780872,0.00015025109,0.0000029475893,7.047885e-7,0.000018379704,0.0024180515,0.00004165293,0.000029735436,0.99595225,0.00036456826,0.0010133688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020906027,0.000014866273,0.0005215404,0.00006719329,0.0000041585304,0.00008528354,0.0026629257,0.00035645865,0.000094254625,0.96412385,0.032024264,0.000024375562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11556729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09554101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88443273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014018462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04402539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22978926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121730967","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994","title":"The Worlds of the Trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Trust law; Common law; Legislation; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); China; Express trust; Settlor; Private law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.020147539263476018,"score_gpt":0.22681165332096292,"score_spread":0.20666411405748691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121730967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009584432,0.011639888,0.017359203,0.039165713,0.00057818904,0.000054029806,0.000071153314,0.000051434836,0.92149603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8762488,0.010143735,0.0047839107,0.0038685598,0.0006612424,0.0002018329,0.0000684723,0.00010098629,0.10392263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905032,0.006025722,0.00025624156,0.000744178,0.0014921537,0.0009786127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943526,0.0029691982,0.00040860576,0.0008608247,0.0005995923,0.0008091915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061042584,0.0006171592,0.0005602943,0.0018539618,0.009999107,0.023075443,0.001234468,0.004834007,0.008797285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010317941,0.00060098385,0.0005382623,0.0021281252,0.061588224,0.022998877,0.010672702,0.0067717424,0.0016907179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018289285,0.0000015840275,0.000025411284,0.000006838937,8.5922966e-7,0.000023970426,0.0022874922,0.000030289033,0.0000067485043,0.99469584,0.0015488905,0.001370389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050230756,0.0000074488844,0.000095478215,0.00013228357,0.0000033741478,0.00010189214,0.003779389,0.00018883767,0.000032768534,0.8582611,0.13738528,0.000007140081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009638448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006780937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023075443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011346475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009233221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0823248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121805234","doi":"","title":"Peoples, BCE, and the Good Corporate \"Citizen\"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Expansive; Corporation; Deference; Law; Discretion; Statutory law; Legislature; Shareholder; Corporate law; Political science; Corporate title; Corporate governance; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02470828335850687,"score_gpt":0.27540565853192944,"score_spread":0.25069737517342255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121805234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039232496,0.009410018,0.0043437285,0.2256315,0.0008449517,0.000048941936,0.000054476553,0.000040293457,0.72039354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83273196,0.0031612632,0.0015272882,0.05509294,0.0003274842,0.00004336601,0.000023581873,0.000026633226,0.10706545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496657,0.001359764,0.00010563198,0.0005191057,0.0015910674,0.0014578903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997938,0.000707207,0.00017862945,0.00015488088,0.00047097073,0.00055030506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003877411,0.00021729959,0.00029395826,0.0009179115,0.015326348,0.008965617,0.00072094076,0.0055706645,0.003067751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048593176,0.00023043531,0.00022859318,0.0007705894,0.04154014,0.0034670066,0.0035617237,0.0053010425,0.00028151745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021240871,0.0000032693115,0.00029349132,0.000007024381,0.0000010457094,0.00004944101,0.0034873653,0.000018753668,0.00003704165,0.9884682,0.0051643294,0.002467878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021255171,0.000017770526,0.002849889,0.00023270055,0.000014040011,0.00016133553,0.011611002,0.0001225557,0.00027234902,0.3167421,0.6679158,0.0000391489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5057793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6733063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5057793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018016571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032419633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99426246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121915089","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01204.x","title":"An Empirical Examination of the Governance Choices of Income Trusts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Jurisdiction; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13504073181063656,"score_gpt":0.4267307255811078,"score_spread":0.2916899937704712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121915089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99824536,0.000035664172,0.0000678277,0.000088935,0.0000010505208,0.000008355869,0.0002219061,9.892647e-7,0.0013298377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992229,0.000027336382,0.00002899491,0.000007961329,0.0000014390288,0.0000034528505,0.0001847029,8.8686176e-7,0.00052229944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767274,0.00037590828,0.00013972749,0.0002410437,0.0007267008,0.00084389746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97727376,0.0033748462,0.013470842,0.0009430113,0.002377553,0.002560049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013694539,0.00010856068,0.00023487431,0.0013737797,0.0014577231,0.0017392981,0.00047691076,0.00028972767,0.0030173627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009429936,0.00016027938,0.00018968286,0.0026205634,0.0017417513,0.0011205971,0.001234615,0.0006044388,0.00023694793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028645936,0.000027926424,0.99246395,0.0000076702,0.00001518678,0.00011391073,0.0034654746,0.00014311528,0.00010211652,0.0008777071,0.00035089054,0.0024033275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031674604,0.000021758085,0.9857555,0.000013775127,0.000007717307,0.000056916746,0.012043296,0.00045954174,0.00009588022,0.00013199408,0.0014030123,0.0000074498853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45996824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65254205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45996824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070525436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035439427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91458184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121924561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.275","title":"EXCLUSION AND EXCLUSIVITY IN PROPERTY LAW","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Setter; Position (finance); Property law; Business; Tangible property; Law; Boundary (topology); Real property; Political science; Sociology; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.023045131689279037,"score_gpt":0.2465368943110173,"score_spread":0.22349176262173825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121924561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079468764,0.0050885347,0.2687724,0.02786374,0.00038962817,0.00013345198,0.00011389482,0.00017054904,0.61799896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96329015,0.0010517932,0.010068555,0.0021308372,0.00040033064,0.00028823846,0.0000618981,0.000079106234,0.022629114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98925054,0.004805311,0.00042392957,0.0016054278,0.0027876145,0.0011271653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99285746,0.0042334446,0.0006927507,0.0010556299,0.00073263637,0.00042805824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075286124,0.00048996217,0.0009888422,0.0017634027,0.006965177,0.007608313,0.0019211456,0.004779242,0.006825047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011449574,0.0005532583,0.0010473178,0.001430846,0.049845506,0.01710983,0.009191674,0.006793055,0.00089207734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000230099,0.000002777319,0.000055498884,0.0000048912966,9.3373757e-7,0.000012730557,0.00031423316,0.00008119969,0.000027046395,0.9987753,0.00014598099,0.00057714223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012013805,0.000010699565,0.00014086642,0.000039087176,0.0000034550067,0.000046720856,0.00023059663,0.00070055557,0.00008383209,0.98567766,0.013047363,0.000007075529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006329408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029441155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007608313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00587066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045593586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04259479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121975556","doi":"10.1002/iir.150","title":"Insolvency law: a comparative analysis of the preference tests in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) and Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Preference; Legislation; Test (biology); Debtor; Law; Relation (database); Political science; Economics; Creditor; Finance; Debt; Computer science","score_opus":0.3138805512943926,"score_gpt":0.47254475796415063,"score_spread":0.15866420666975806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121975556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905376,0.0007813603,0.00017092946,0.00024251961,0.000007006109,0.000030167823,0.00004492297,0.0000018541181,0.008183758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984786,0.0003534007,0.000070157395,0.00006701939,0.000005945825,0.0000137259685,0.000057656755,0.0000012281927,0.00095224386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934007,0.0027839518,0.00037123746,0.0002947177,0.0019380663,0.0012113468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96375185,0.018080395,0.00841933,0.0008621763,0.0073804245,0.0015057494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00827915,0.00013782183,0.00067178695,0.0026032596,0.0013117603,0.0017124426,0.0005314595,0.00034394913,0.002843925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028430775,0.00024072203,0.0004729031,0.003741711,0.0026347635,0.0011059842,0.0014245415,0.0009970189,0.00015263948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009817067,0.00070677686,0.802164,0.0007332333,0.0005715379,0.002456852,0.04053576,0.0035321997,0.0009652216,0.06026947,0.0058459374,0.08123713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034636945,0.00030997102,0.98085874,0.00008572907,0.000107863474,0.00016138944,0.011637403,0.001398302,0.00022532644,0.00080710166,0.004353447,0.000020080157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2572236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2801715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2572236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049025714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055333325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5114528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021911","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0215","title":"A theory of redressive justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Undoing; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Enforcement; Tort; Political science; Law; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.015587830290980638,"score_gpt":0.25685699440608467,"score_spread":0.24126916411510405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122021911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011182547,0.0019743063,0.2626035,0.015029225,0.0006684919,0.00011363136,0.00012135859,0.00013070709,0.7081763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80204225,0.0019278652,0.05632956,0.009459807,0.0011466126,0.00043833823,0.00016274091,0.00022340479,0.12826942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938221,0.002131963,0.00020512675,0.0012417237,0.0018620421,0.00073709234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959266,0.0016900186,0.00041630477,0.0009010639,0.00075763086,0.0003083749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058241547,0.0006019676,0.0006250595,0.0017574355,0.0047633736,0.005650515,0.0022166774,0.0041335383,0.0113262525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00702965,0.00038988492,0.0011011033,0.001053751,0.021560684,0.008643136,0.0045235744,0.0055783167,0.0017248843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.6018345e-7,0.0000017948248,0.000022484264,0.0000028821,7.369009e-7,0.0000088088445,0.00013259855,0.00005806906,0.000008184252,0.9988802,0.000309791,0.00057389337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062021754,0.000007714596,0.00009223724,0.000034754292,0.0000040528957,0.00007049106,0.00016552428,0.0006574777,0.000049863283,0.965376,0.033529643,0.000005982878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051001036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047405898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0113262525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047120852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046581025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037890077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122022813","doi":"","title":"Contracts: Force Majeure Concept or Force Majeure Clauses ?","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Business; Public law","score_opus":0.01792010847398209,"score_gpt":0.31819242613888005,"score_spread":0.300272317664898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122022813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05906556,0.024224235,0.04505938,0.13510726,0.0018882006,0.000149572,0.0006761136,0.000056922338,0.73377275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367187,0.008934431,0.008753195,0.010303389,0.0025297033,0.00026086022,0.00033416026,0.000051941493,0.032113668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519324,0.0017270658,0.00021595415,0.00061525975,0.001482308,0.00076619076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878094,0.007273934,0.0026203836,0.00049699214,0.0011411507,0.00065808115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006651612,0.00045090815,0.0007361914,0.0017285461,0.0027208896,0.0065496415,0.0016793438,0.0060264883,0.012189119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021068716,0.00038328467,0.000425679,0.0030421314,0.015365464,0.016982341,0.0019663984,0.0046136607,0.0010357847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042729553,0.000003837393,0.00020258952,0.000014678377,0.0000010395775,0.000010386971,0.0002399493,0.000031636915,0.000012874273,0.9956428,0.001916663,0.0019193225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023633182,0.00002351163,0.0018218367,0.00027587084,0.0000099836125,0.00019859339,0.0019493536,0.0005881858,0.000064602966,0.9135328,0.081487596,0.000023992372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009481641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008483763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012189119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003986787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050519384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04077667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122061486","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1273","title":"Weather, Leather, and the Obligation to Disclose: Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Prospectus; Obligation; Law; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Supreme court; Statutory law; Issuer; Statute; Political science; Business; History; Finance","score_opus":0.010621077471350129,"score_gpt":0.2713514578852011,"score_spread":0.260730380413851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122061486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106211126,0.010077097,0.0022154502,0.3945744,0.0020601405,0.00015402841,0.00053472654,0.00010142185,0.48407152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7738166,0.0036215375,0.0009770456,0.12936734,0.0015537249,0.00005970387,0.00009325413,0.00005529526,0.09045556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993807,0.0009808857,0.00031273413,0.0006730769,0.0028611482,0.0013650556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941199,0.0031920641,0.00048822275,0.0002418741,0.0014988823,0.0004590599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004543795,0.00029418367,0.00037780716,0.0005032504,0.009039267,0.006209361,0.0021300926,0.015007112,0.0021180564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016079856,0.0005875506,0.0005111083,0.0006444225,0.007966436,0.0022688168,0.0012414953,0.008076747,0.0004556235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011531674,0.00004619107,0.0069309217,0.0001456259,0.000038360635,0.004335633,0.038300004,0.0005017082,0.0022012806,0.6665944,0.26474836,0.016042175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012967378,0.000082828155,0.022024134,0.00066606683,0.0002347112,0.0011733576,0.012778914,0.0015658335,0.0024906527,0.06610176,0.892452,0.00030015115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81474787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9121464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18525213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031956114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040694043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3726862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122182973","doi":"10.7202/1018988ar","title":"Contract’s Meaning and the Histories of Classical Contract Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Individualism; Law; Social contract; Vision; Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.023678146374099533,"score_gpt":0.2768374858055749,"score_spread":0.25315933943147534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122182973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07351072,0.019020347,0.038406026,0.05048405,0.00081010844,0.000051020324,0.0000800906,0.00005354875,0.817584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766236,0.0027047275,0.002556039,0.0016672387,0.00027910675,0.00003802919,0.00002349827,0.00004423748,0.016063578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940843,0.0031295957,0.00018948967,0.0005317,0.0015016946,0.0005632466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949191,0.0034165413,0.0002840156,0.0005396798,0.00054454885,0.0002961121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065385248,0.00034100914,0.000334689,0.0021040316,0.007623865,0.008093087,0.0013823865,0.003518764,0.002981489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011785071,0.00039536084,0.00031908034,0.0020440647,0.06919432,0.01120236,0.003922449,0.0048847566,0.0002965788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018292071,0.000001178907,0.000021516575,0.0000037017592,3.6523065e-7,0.00001071262,0.0021007375,0.00003630813,0.000005587725,0.99693584,0.00027974686,0.0006024959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046537043,0.000004396309,0.00012914899,0.00005625103,0.000001780557,0.000039936825,0.0017362017,0.00032272766,0.00004447947,0.9544254,0.04322835,0.000006556069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017011229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103239035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01888249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01888249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007549184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1370027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122184023","doi":"","title":"LEGAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGES","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Commonwealth; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Subject (documents); Sociology","score_opus":0.07027222147544328,"score_gpt":0.3288787539213947,"score_spread":0.25860653244595144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122184023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022518825,0.008761942,0.14079483,0.15614572,0.0019188775,0.0012685739,0.0003551317,0.00027564022,0.66796046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75924814,0.005373003,0.10231648,0.037926424,0.0015469062,0.0009032925,0.0001624884,0.00011835394,0.09240488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.952633,0.009769972,0.003132663,0.004181641,0.021838771,0.008443994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979054,0.008669384,0.0017463411,0.0015682438,0.007737349,0.001224739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036735483,0.0006775693,0.0009942675,0.00295983,0.017532919,0.011485167,0.005002892,0.012042807,0.0022546153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045735892,0.001561782,0.000983678,0.0020186028,0.049365126,0.003817008,0.004233157,0.014602881,0.000993352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002186257,0.0000064067967,0.0001814264,0.00002295452,0.0000032471473,0.000047205252,0.0025144555,0.00016276659,0.00010948504,0.98811954,0.004492437,0.004337846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045205514,0.0000256572,0.0016941912,0.0003756751,0.000026896952,0.00015630157,0.001675648,0.0006254198,0.0005353597,0.82160944,0.17315336,0.00007674384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42365235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5827932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42365235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022232521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08720089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84237283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122184729","doi":"","title":"The Genealogy of Legal Positivism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Politics; Space (punctuation); Epistemology; Legal formalism; Law; Style (visual arts); Legal realism; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; History; Legal profession; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.00793565863669261,"score_gpt":0.2860704364173628,"score_spread":0.2781347777806702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122184729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039948788,0.020023234,0.07900049,0.2784116,0.0019506961,0.000051275107,0.00015033512,0.0002588485,0.5802048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94508165,0.006739227,0.012803291,0.013831788,0.0016800687,0.0001515554,0.000072725816,0.00023256929,0.019407216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919354,0.0046124565,0.00020938316,0.0010664862,0.001622563,0.00055369036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867844,0.009438078,0.0005722821,0.0014197265,0.0011847403,0.0006008256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009777249,0.00033648332,0.0005522249,0.0034060844,0.004676266,0.010484494,0.001308802,0.0030715768,0.004222267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013080667,0.0005318685,0.0005148874,0.0016038227,0.067132,0.011739686,0.0041747973,0.008043712,0.000780723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028716815,0.0000048418624,0.00006794613,0.0000101339165,0.0000020863913,0.000014381444,0.00093799684,0.00009062685,0.0000145299455,0.99649066,0.0007913696,0.0015725623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008481326,0.000004107255,0.00009145003,0.000035313322,0.0000016506733,0.000023475022,0.00028948707,0.00026687753,0.000035065423,0.9747999,0.024439484,0.000004817701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005776403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028191565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01205295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01205295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005538888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08745068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122214964","doi":"","title":"The Immunity of the Attorney General to Law Society Discipline","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Statutory law; Good faith; Discretion; Legislature","score_opus":0.0215225436389435,"score_gpt":0.2997566813757308,"score_spread":0.2782341377367873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122214964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31639194,0.003956776,0.0032183398,0.13133767,0.0009128417,0.0001451914,0.0002507812,0.00008014225,0.5437062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93825805,0.0005474577,0.00031846794,0.012851193,0.00040260464,0.00004129376,0.000052644045,0.00001801223,0.04751027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98703045,0.0025670708,0.0008248657,0.0013423093,0.003215359,0.0050199754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705045,0.014689586,0.0030261523,0.0015039106,0.00678985,0.0034859942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072882804,0.00017045636,0.00031933418,0.0007745934,0.005567176,0.008014219,0.0010061336,0.0057528587,0.009407735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033898003,0.00043385001,0.0003456364,0.0005734527,0.0081808,0.0028049948,0.0035939936,0.0037932696,0.0011434571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022675333,0.00017406335,0.064664625,0.00023028134,0.000079998725,0.0024150717,0.024717592,0.0007812652,0.0026823704,0.8141189,0.049287457,0.040621478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023913886,0.00044357547,0.2877452,0.0013239913,0.000241275,0.0014723977,0.027847296,0.001816982,0.003774014,0.10384093,0.57107514,0.00018008865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12867528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1953482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12867528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013599442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020727167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25585264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122249877","doi":"","title":"A Public Role for the Intentional Torts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Judicial opinion; Private law; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02199882557528531,"score_gpt":0.29986066490759317,"score_spread":0.27786183933230785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122249877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056871194,0.0041798027,0.015617766,0.4339409,0.001380566,0.000050795163,0.00014146631,0.00015690345,0.48766062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471303,0.001141908,0.001028452,0.0294949,0.0016234561,0.000060875853,0.00005032531,0.00006375283,0.019405985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868275,0.0053940895,0.00035905783,0.0015606893,0.0036213617,0.0022372415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97874445,0.014563455,0.0018076843,0.00231963,0.0018712326,0.000693551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014344033,0.00044542746,0.0006495193,0.0016903863,0.009888847,0.017184671,0.0017158369,0.014850194,0.0107314065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023367718,0.0005544649,0.00092891004,0.0010700638,0.040906996,0.018999454,0.0072904574,0.012270414,0.0011208903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006611986,0.000012401943,0.00016311885,0.000016306993,0.0000028944307,0.00006946025,0.0023131468,0.000059487676,0.000056709538,0.99042904,0.005208617,0.0016622929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003923902,0.000035538527,0.0012695174,0.0002795344,0.00004393979,0.00025535058,0.007032848,0.0007444075,0.000676354,0.8053814,0.18420361,0.000038173697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071450686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063196174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017184671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010818735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008026765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0784958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122274319","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.579","title":"GIVING VOICE TO REALITY: MICHAEL TREBILCOCK AND PENSION GOVERNANCE ISSUES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Moral hazard; Pension; Liability; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Commission; Business; Private pension; Economics; Actuarial science; Law; Finance; Sociology; Political science; Incentive; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.014998732713589107,"score_gpt":0.2777613802792982,"score_spread":0.2627626475657091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122274319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019542964,0.01514112,0.0036912803,0.7636872,0.000797155,0.000020786969,0.000022942839,0.000034135443,0.19706242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86694586,0.007735906,0.0013964435,0.08478303,0.0021835375,0.0000637957,0.000014586715,0.000043704076,0.036833134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914308,0.004712555,0.0001757989,0.00088310445,0.0017207628,0.0010769572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938835,0.0038979107,0.00056332676,0.00027574948,0.0005343082,0.00084514165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008311419,0.0003062381,0.00046768208,0.00080990634,0.013171752,0.011983282,0.0016597465,0.012654864,0.0038235714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127579495,0.00048378567,0.0003424989,0.0013460994,0.0400412,0.010982125,0.004644191,0.0095409155,0.00055664114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069534035,0.000009063863,0.00021176512,0.000022302984,0.000002746137,0.00021239919,0.0128239235,0.00018403034,0.000032579555,0.9555441,0.026608232,0.004341843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016811697,0.000018086012,0.0007010488,0.00020207147,0.000007042025,0.00033089204,0.013883045,0.00041426404,0.00014091196,0.701491,0.28276002,0.000034845576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03592284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02772441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01218373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076189963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08839953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122347404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4372","title":"OPPORTUNITY LOST: THE SUPREME COURT MISSES A HISTORIC CHANCE TO CONSIDER QUESTION OF PUBLIC INTEREST STANDING FOR ANIMAL INTERESTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Humanities; Intervention (counseling); Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.2804840550246441,"score_gpt":0.4300931352395599,"score_spread":0.1496090802149158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122347404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020919817,0.010615237,0.0054402957,0.7475922,0.0033567068,0.000019613117,0.00008759011,0.000052271927,0.21191627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70942426,0.004919113,0.0017373702,0.22904523,0.003955475,0.00004061389,0.00006682771,0.000099324134,0.050711744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99313813,0.0015908023,0.00013460807,0.0007217453,0.0022715956,0.0021430699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395025,0.0034244445,0.00024154012,0.00032733523,0.0010133176,0.0010430886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007888509,0.0003017172,0.0006699229,0.0010997164,0.016841376,0.018778248,0.002510226,0.01633334,0.0045150598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0153151825,0.00042206727,0.0005483551,0.0009286348,0.047594573,0.010364712,0.005474986,0.034458037,0.0005252826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007835402,0.0000088356455,0.00021491392,0.000012222458,0.00000507782,0.00023887558,0.0028929044,0.000088690394,0.000094237264,0.9568927,0.033934668,0.0056090336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020370917,0.000023480881,0.0008283926,0.00026664775,0.0000192075,0.00018239686,0.0081997495,0.00024711288,0.00023638555,0.58477795,0.40513453,0.000063829364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2720006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42202014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7279994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023617782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033692453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5408348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122377272","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1191","title":"Will Negligence Law Poison the Well of Foreign Aid? A Case Comment on: Binod Sutradhar v. Natural Environment Research Council","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Personal injury; Action (physics); Liberian dollar; Law; Natural (archaeology); Relation (database); Common law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; History","score_opus":0.04863034106752313,"score_gpt":0.3402469417336626,"score_spread":0.2916166006661395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122377272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04080195,0.0074447407,0.0015099766,0.7959881,0.0016663134,0.000060364255,0.000069084315,0.00005286472,0.15240663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44925016,0.004263704,0.00071841123,0.48233998,0.001451178,0.00007438734,0.000035597237,0.000040610354,0.06182609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804235,0.0004758941,0.00010053558,0.00035735333,0.00044243463,0.0005813747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610364,0.0029231592,0.00030931341,0.00011208039,0.00031240188,0.00023944097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028910502,0.00041113805,0.0005858411,0.00060422946,0.01110793,0.0044077523,0.0020893638,0.02549969,0.005844918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064365654,0.000503248,0.00075662136,0.0007851584,0.009299582,0.0033407914,0.0029273052,0.02434142,0.0006841688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071427414,0.00008863569,0.0056025567,0.00014996229,0.000028761855,0.009036271,0.02303369,0.00036612412,0.00064161874,0.7150622,0.23562498,0.010293732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007959143,0.00020556647,0.009036497,0.0010965883,0.00012353006,0.0077644926,0.043495968,0.0013977006,0.002067886,0.13661583,0.79791707,0.00019932206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04290674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08573149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04290674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005015793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006003923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085313976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122432221","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016062","title":"The Duties of Trustees in Comparative Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Perspective (graphical); Private law; Civil code; Common law; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.033551555355479344,"score_gpt":0.33410100477760396,"score_spread":0.30054944942212464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122432221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06961162,0.09024272,0.015959725,0.027398154,0.00077509513,0.000057174446,0.000118963755,0.000035397243,0.79580116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96365386,0.018701458,0.0012155016,0.0016038488,0.00022196662,0.000035248093,0.00004246172,0.000019933776,0.014505727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98522645,0.008214813,0.0006296891,0.0008804433,0.002762976,0.002285726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922198,0.0040820735,0.00080758595,0.0006451741,0.0016710431,0.0005742129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008212085,0.00031590488,0.0004894709,0.0050462256,0.0065497686,0.0121308,0.0010406729,0.0034991396,0.0037091395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012828808,0.0003091826,0.00042485422,0.0049551614,0.028348433,0.012531484,0.00420541,0.0027512948,0.0003108967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033655667,0.0000029795724,0.00022738299,0.000048602855,0.000003931269,0.0000518315,0.0065875626,0.000107656706,0.000022444763,0.9877045,0.0011132644,0.0041265474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011263953,0.000040097133,0.007142622,0.0015046697,0.000035355908,0.0005096189,0.043178923,0.0007002003,0.0002182676,0.3705737,0.576026,0.000059254973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10335033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09074099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10335033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023429075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013002493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20549756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122467187","doi":"","title":"Consideration Which Happens to Fail","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Expansive; Unjust enrichment; Context (archaeology); Law; Database transaction; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.024467127772543222,"score_gpt":0.33266772386737253,"score_spread":0.3082005960948293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122467187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03504418,0.0038845611,0.01298695,0.25379238,0.002679721,0.000091931455,0.00008251717,0.00015978089,0.691278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86749995,0.0012219419,0.0015759814,0.07928335,0.001505773,0.00014600834,0.00005392123,0.0003002414,0.048412744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9614004,0.015519611,0.0012969585,0.0050791493,0.008304106,0.008399769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97513527,0.014255092,0.0013510388,0.0023234673,0.0049204696,0.002014759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021343669,0.00055768626,0.0007593134,0.0012877402,0.018249255,0.012481798,0.0026200325,0.015908102,0.0098677585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05016597,0.00051593775,0.0013112775,0.00096892955,0.048959013,0.0139012225,0.009743909,0.016624276,0.0017096245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014009422,0.000010355585,0.0005135659,0.000031089265,0.0000062770755,0.00059846253,0.015611251,0.000064933294,0.000097651806,0.95668226,0.022003194,0.0043668672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018855986,0.000027049316,0.00084586535,0.00036157586,0.000022397826,0.00047023097,0.023408677,0.00044340297,0.00042154326,0.5842715,0.38965085,0.000058156184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04062936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030304627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04062936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014441756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0167445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11287743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122511176","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500006065","title":"Supreme Courts as Courts of General Original Jurisdiction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Certiorari; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Court of record","score_opus":0.025822554780004375,"score_gpt":0.3240781227313847,"score_spread":0.2982555679513803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122511176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12636945,0.009671845,0.01924676,0.013883297,0.00058108545,0.000121576406,0.00033357795,0.00026485152,0.8295277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96935004,0.00092167873,0.0029729365,0.002079494,0.00033127316,0.000036145837,0.000115484356,0.000026014935,0.024166863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857362,0.005926765,0.0005638413,0.0015433613,0.00410561,0.0021242057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97558165,0.01324865,0.0021268968,0.0020039969,0.0052622375,0.0017766218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00724791,0.00019015315,0.0003701136,0.0039396877,0.0043090377,0.010713233,0.0014551544,0.0029760527,0.010651798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017841926,0.00048498478,0.00044099664,0.0036384717,0.009111428,0.0058108536,0.004425623,0.0037326245,0.00078572513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006334302,0.000009394449,0.00086607394,0.000016290258,0.0000065504996,0.00013330454,0.0014897229,0.00024137713,0.00011775117,0.98586744,0.004394687,0.006851147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064951884,0.000065692075,0.008926321,0.00034668483,0.00005680991,0.0004371504,0.002305989,0.00377753,0.00080083153,0.6628983,0.32022414,0.000095670046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027105156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024205321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027105156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007826027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006135908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056782067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122538769","doi":"","title":"Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Appeal; Creditor; Business; Credit history; Debt; Tribunal; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05373279725040031,"score_gpt":0.3740905111768526,"score_spread":0.3203577139264523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122538769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09983293,0.0038901104,0.0031686695,0.6226805,0.004285358,0.0007311347,0.00047188188,0.00031103464,0.2646285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45158097,0.004004702,0.0055896034,0.16935953,0.0012059993,0.0004275272,0.00042000282,0.00041752038,0.3669942],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745559,0.0019422661,0.0010785245,0.0022302389,0.012061492,0.008131512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93086624,0.013883991,0.0027311735,0.0022388475,0.027591044,0.022688696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015313924,0.00038859682,0.0007840717,0.0014543309,0.05609865,0.017678564,0.0060313744,0.014775222,0.02309458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04493066,0.0016615828,0.0010038194,0.0026278407,0.012436142,0.0057366616,0.007977652,0.013966049,0.0016642333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021831268,0.0002350151,0.03341084,0.00044145354,0.00008794029,0.010461684,0.05448168,0.0005778309,0.0023667815,0.15145063,0.6772042,0.06906373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007629837,0.000057451332,0.025064025,0.00038930244,0.0000722251,0.0007522204,0.037611127,0.0010503003,0.0004668866,0.009653641,0.9246009,0.00020565344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98402196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16452639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16452639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3799582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.969031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122598104","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3139","title":"From Baby-selling to Boilerplate: Reflections on the Limits of the Infrastructures of the Market","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Boilerplate text; Law and economics; Law; Commercialization; Economics; Polity; Sociology; Business; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.06596457273450847,"score_gpt":0.36222374621063724,"score_spread":0.2962591734761288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122598104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05759437,0.039055772,0.025360577,0.3216987,0.0010662097,0.000059809314,0.00006318051,0.00012143765,0.5549799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92080355,0.012813707,0.0049369666,0.025191694,0.00069659576,0.00010727751,0.000025486841,0.00019600558,0.03522876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528825,0.002757502,0.00009284079,0.00036781668,0.0007677437,0.0007258647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921708,0.0062203133,0.0002738037,0.00046884993,0.00045623266,0.0004099941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008600618,0.00063708285,0.00073461764,0.0017450475,0.008523109,0.01674424,0.0025127456,0.011910874,0.006953176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011658201,0.0007752262,0.0007701159,0.0014974652,0.07048728,0.033749398,0.010303247,0.014486742,0.0009013518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039967535,0.0000036589565,0.000033107328,0.000015675168,6.751202e-7,0.000070321,0.005016678,0.000059787304,0.000031284795,0.9923381,0.0015505591,0.0008762765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007987565,0.000020645388,0.00016085154,0.00034290136,0.000004230956,0.00019044534,0.013511522,0.00041925453,0.00030389254,0.8247807,0.16023783,0.00001973259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013944922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010492849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01674424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013990663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054471972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10150987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122670959","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198852940.001.0001","title":"Torts and Other Wrongs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Equivocation; Damages; Economic Justice; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.02739378188985002,"score_gpt":0.3104333121458793,"score_spread":0.2830395302560293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122670959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005822785,0.017055217,0.0019184814,0.02318971,0.0014396874,0.000014896437,0.000093058,0.00003472674,0.95043135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5897285,0.023579221,0.001202177,0.013180653,0.0041892827,0.00007426113,0.00024365011,0.00006876551,0.3677335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818915,0.0006075987,0.00004611049,0.0002129029,0.00066033384,0.00028385632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983053,0.0009281417,0.00011973573,0.0002610253,0.000241388,0.0001443998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001613006,0.00041439157,0.00048857427,0.0019653647,0.0043673324,0.0052386527,0.000539521,0.0030059158,0.019594792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035169304,0.0002170714,0.0005715028,0.0015225672,0.018434929,0.005360715,0.002777884,0.0037701891,0.0016059405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001275457,0.0000044596686,0.00006495358,0.000007365453,0.0000012202105,0.000034836812,0.00041564996,0.000055985474,0.000007086896,0.98716694,0.009744079,0.0024961412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006101305,0.0000052773044,0.00039191393,0.00015678717,0.0000038586613,0.00018277542,0.000749094,0.00011492924,0.00002907241,0.71996176,0.27839217,0.0000062392005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006365799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066651893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019594792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00412315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00210495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0655511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122809876","doi":"","title":"Seduction of a Law Professor","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Task (project management); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Management; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015278536752930873,"score_gpt":0.30731929155985205,"score_spread":0.29204075480692115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122809876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043429956,0.043490097,0.010683276,0.4237796,0.02885264,0.00004328622,0.00009512271,0.00036848558,0.4883446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1420298,0.013065462,0.0033667448,0.26377308,0.014515923,0.000106406,0.00008623343,0.00029488848,0.5627614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933606,0.003192167,0.00018470397,0.001293276,0.0014607516,0.0005085302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994338,0.0029274852,0.00038964604,0.00047082768,0.0011183969,0.0007557741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004627172,0.00041348615,0.0004481511,0.000950759,0.0051701143,0.0055957995,0.0018431909,0.0047456007,0.018411916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014514072,0.00030284576,0.00035336314,0.0007921393,0.011968984,0.006769309,0.0038871844,0.008503509,0.008084196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010209727,0.0000071474888,0.00019697816,0.000062971456,0.0000036488534,0.0001181242,0.0024847605,0.000049638296,0.00008746891,0.601908,0.37347057,0.021600518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022258612,0.000008697073,0.00016198026,0.00010097535,0.0000020397717,0.00013051402,0.00051218644,0.00007963225,0.00009568893,0.023032757,0.9758657,0.0000076261817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058777467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010712667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018411916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052258237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043830546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06159395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122813947","doi":"","title":"Legal Epistemology in the Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Doctrine; Law; Private law; Legal realism; Political science; Common law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03857855128584417,"score_gpt":0.3206666080344395,"score_spread":0.2820880567485954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122813947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039575655,0.042108264,0.062448505,0.15929112,0.0039652977,0.00007180706,0.00017690321,0.00022349908,0.69213897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430125,0.00814603,0.006925515,0.009698506,0.00261233,0.00016670328,0.00010342445,0.00012341767,0.029211544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912497,0.006499511,0.00020727023,0.00063190435,0.0009511391,0.00046056428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908221,0.0071836123,0.00058813946,0.00058869336,0.0005463766,0.00027109802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008145944,0.00038592948,0.00053153955,0.0016252967,0.005601509,0.008858125,0.0015450639,0.00473931,0.005857206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008474554,0.00024432642,0.0006590808,0.0019225313,0.039849002,0.0065570083,0.00552791,0.00696246,0.0006348844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027654894,0.0000033799313,0.00003780414,0.000014951349,7.169219e-7,0.000015368249,0.0017893988,0.000033628156,0.000013064923,0.99530494,0.0016240515,0.0011599953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006809843,0.000017410835,0.0004559736,0.00033401584,0.0000060142465,0.0001344772,0.0027068139,0.00046590986,0.00015830196,0.8686461,0.12705182,0.000016375474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036501985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020503055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008858125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008369132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037781978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06072259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122871717","doi":"","title":"Des exceptions opposables par la caution au créancier","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.08795292485305023,"score_gpt":0.32726795885816107,"score_spread":0.23931503400511084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122871717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05089027,0.061691456,0.051808618,0.49303705,0.019230692,0.00017556812,0.0005644406,0.0014158586,0.32118613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6277638,0.016806321,0.022688981,0.15877248,0.02062774,0.00041824,0.00029085274,0.0005676943,0.15206392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9661651,0.012659024,0.001740128,0.0061455895,0.011148259,0.002141993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97706795,0.014260554,0.0012495547,0.0018127259,0.0050038416,0.0006054114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01734785,0.0013681842,0.0014550706,0.0021768215,0.0057679093,0.015989298,0.0024350584,0.012866503,0.0045041787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042901862,0.0005475487,0.002079833,0.0011504758,0.012637419,0.007962673,0.0030034734,0.026724076,0.0024157406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012731028,0.000037162215,0.0011197351,0.00019972926,0.00006752261,0.0011403214,0.0053197024,0.0010133855,0.0013826274,0.8655404,0.07974799,0.04430408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007049492,0.000060480637,0.0019478801,0.0005123012,0.0000363038,0.00079901813,0.0015796514,0.0012568408,0.0015200822,0.06637873,0.92572683,0.000111448826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11018932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05809941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11018932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01402094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009707445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21909589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122948277","doi":"","title":"The Public Fiduciary: Emerging Themes in Canadian Fiduciary Law for Pension Trustees","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Pension; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Law; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Supreme court; Political science; Economics; Finance; Duty","score_opus":0.023409224534907614,"score_gpt":0.28803840945673154,"score_spread":0.2646291849218239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122948277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07754123,0.02597864,0.024331063,0.3621971,0.0013567552,0.00015597127,0.00043983295,0.00017227096,0.5078271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218672,0.0076532746,0.006790346,0.019363143,0.0004052526,0.00007555114,0.00010154521,0.00008837516,0.043655265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799478,0.0033146918,0.0006445174,0.001937363,0.008257741,0.0058979997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807076,0.008480195,0.0010082239,0.0009981807,0.006667039,0.002138799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01666772,0.0004796359,0.0007037668,0.004236732,0.03129568,0.026423343,0.004339629,0.009694018,0.0052740015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031405464,0.0006310209,0.0010232326,0.006828277,0.042626552,0.00820689,0.0057333307,0.011697661,0.0002937686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035563091,0.0000054168518,0.0006819,0.000035776364,0.0000038589346,0.00010153039,0.0073005985,0.00025632998,0.00004565383,0.97648484,0.0078051793,0.00727532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022345155,0.000026570779,0.014058606,0.0010053442,0.000051633568,0.00026863138,0.029196393,0.003113548,0.00048922084,0.35266843,0.5988749,0.00022432335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26344946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26344946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29345056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85429424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122979037","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3045","title":"“By the Court”: The Untold Story of a Canadian Judicial Innovation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Headline; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.0329388229939824,"score_gpt":0.2842558277416419,"score_spread":0.2513170047476595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122979037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032211833,0.012004561,0.0017827667,0.6013431,0.0031089364,0.000045493587,0.00023964135,0.00008226246,0.34918135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8111705,0.008162634,0.0016211267,0.10772007,0.0014720799,0.000041632127,0.000111894435,0.00012412557,0.069575965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98513836,0.0022167366,0.0001848054,0.0012365095,0.0072732284,0.003950217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887016,0.0027163555,0.00035054196,0.00044927577,0.006219045,0.0015632195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064826007,0.00046508492,0.0005279278,0.0019444163,0.048067484,0.013407645,0.0033948873,0.00930442,0.003436557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022163818,0.0003630849,0.0005934691,0.0035886324,0.035678696,0.003728026,0.0033137784,0.013693721,0.0004293912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023932605,0.000012525165,0.00112097,0.00006055524,0.000015130943,0.0006071296,0.032132,0.00033991857,0.00023848114,0.7595388,0.1877157,0.018194914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023193525,0.000016089436,0.0043554,0.00027267484,0.000039296887,0.00023065995,0.022653935,0.0006014397,0.00027734815,0.046831764,0.9245597,0.00013847843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98930395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15251777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15251777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20314972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123041085","doi":"","title":"The Fusion of Law and Equity: A Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Equity (law); Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Fiduciary; Court of equity; Constructive trust; Confusion; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07348848615161258,"score_gpt":0.3591703704955806,"score_spread":0.285681884343968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123041085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014441837,0.029078055,0.002565175,0.16432121,0.00076118845,0.00007429577,0.00033034984,0.000038491933,0.7883894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74314016,0.057791643,0.00856192,0.040454283,0.00084752985,0.000092616785,0.0002643915,0.00013256776,0.14871481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914473,0.0010924735,0.00017153852,0.000849415,0.003715012,0.0027241847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995272,0.0011931524,0.0002103551,0.00015811148,0.0022728418,0.000893557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004337902,0.00084389705,0.0010124978,0.00980053,0.037277382,0.020128286,0.0037111912,0.008218259,0.011590128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071596014,0.00079739036,0.0009069229,0.010013258,0.04231579,0.009947824,0.0055624503,0.009125896,0.0006639551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008444131,0.000009622463,0.0003962035,0.00004284592,0.0000042719175,0.00013735653,0.0042354465,0.00023856845,0.000049393817,0.9736546,0.01440694,0.0068163504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023551362,0.000018962857,0.0040709507,0.00077153713,0.000040365303,0.0003019349,0.02062197,0.00159681,0.00019676803,0.27410468,0.6981215,0.00013105378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99611366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3345382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3345382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30126798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7718414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123047564","doi":"10.1111/lest.12110","title":"Obligations in the shade: the application of fiduciary directors' duties to shadow directors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Shadow (psychology); Discretion; Law; Test (biology); Power (physics); Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Duty","score_opus":0.045843469942528595,"score_gpt":0.36345810189706035,"score_spread":0.31761463195453177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123047564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08219871,0.0018084686,0.01623387,0.02381872,0.00037283075,0.0000562806,0.000034220135,0.000032597974,0.87544423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644225,0.00043567677,0.0020733525,0.0049590743,0.00017821578,0.000039104594,0.00001193673,0.000019260247,0.027860763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032146,0.003044693,0.00026922007,0.00090314576,0.0035995287,0.0018620474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914915,0.0047239535,0.0006470961,0.0008739385,0.001591369,0.0006721423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007046362,0.00022947213,0.00045055198,0.0014375747,0.0074283825,0.0054056,0.0011352202,0.0029885068,0.00429099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021473201,0.0003700109,0.00042743213,0.001025419,0.0341755,0.0060892333,0.0062588956,0.0049362048,0.00041875057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033269864,0.0000043604064,0.00039039232,0.0000065378217,0.0000010570192,0.000060947372,0.004079343,0.000064140084,0.000048560392,0.9913703,0.0011194714,0.002851437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040189414,0.00004044811,0.0062702196,0.00023796472,0.0000191478,0.0002837689,0.008849176,0.0010022635,0.0005520064,0.8101487,0.17250104,0.00005509301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0892143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1090792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0892143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009717173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012227243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17739004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123129785","doi":"","title":"Driedger's 'Modern Principle' at the Supreme Court of Canada: Interpretation, Justification, Legitimization","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statute; Law; Statutory law; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Common law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006355965112121163,"score_gpt":0.1903944770057369,"score_spread":0.18403851189361572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123129785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018444857,0.02143966,0.026486864,0.22565931,0.0026227243,0.00008152215,0.00037780052,0.00021354799,0.70467365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73517895,0.01285125,0.019804368,0.07010909,0.0014311626,0.00011530028,0.00018407457,0.0002836737,0.1600421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99062145,0.0014479585,0.00018558674,0.0010914074,0.0051418003,0.0015118105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731797,0.0010038969,0.00014259211,0.00019247466,0.0011446574,0.00019838534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043081604,0.0005992405,0.00057114556,0.0025275382,0.015186096,0.012143011,0.0021533854,0.008016361,0.0036962754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009753078,0.00046799405,0.0005946513,0.0042269747,0.03568467,0.0052688583,0.00322815,0.01065616,0.00059571216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000197684,0.0000014251714,0.00006597248,0.000010456437,0.0000018562654,0.000025644267,0.0013606444,0.00006734146,0.000033805594,0.98233885,0.012697443,0.0033945804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013080225,0.00000734877,0.0011735056,0.00023880259,0.000015540707,0.00011202079,0.0021283817,0.00074475375,0.0004295951,0.54169106,0.45336142,0.000084525156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8759415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9106349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124058485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07483792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08646343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5429897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123161047","doi":"","title":"Constructive Trusts from a Law and Economics Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Unjust enrichment; Unconscionability; Express trust; Plaintiff; Function (biology); Law and economics; Settlor; Deterrence theory; Law; Political science; Business; Economics; Process (computing); Computer science; Restitution","score_opus":0.018248053692312083,"score_gpt":0.24718779746965003,"score_spread":0.22893974377733795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123161047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027531508,0.0056573777,0.32390282,0.049972538,0.00045104572,0.00022566043,0.00012378044,0.00009342912,0.59204185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94024867,0.0029745456,0.026424954,0.003115957,0.0006694838,0.0002557228,0.000040365256,0.000032134296,0.026238149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99090844,0.0039108633,0.00033614895,0.00058710575,0.003309346,0.0009479275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896912,0.0062941746,0.001159541,0.0008448351,0.0014797371,0.00053053926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074338587,0.0006948135,0.00047550764,0.0029116343,0.0033836032,0.010137323,0.001506115,0.005351443,0.004297076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011585802,0.0005598003,0.001061496,0.0015036495,0.028114397,0.012413435,0.00345365,0.0046224943,0.00061294035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.991436e-7,0.0000022981062,0.000030938634,0.0000051454504,0.000001194165,0.00001608468,0.00004601748,0.0003081401,0.00001018873,0.9988716,0.00017138332,0.0005364708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040786285,0.0000103398,0.00009770401,0.000032568205,0.0000030696192,0.00005135654,0.00012261819,0.0013944115,0.00005317265,0.9898196,0.008404086,0.000007049275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053914543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004590653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006284415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07448542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123311483","doi":"10.1016/j.jfo.2021.08.005","title":"The Stolen Generation: Canadian and Australian Approaches to Fiduciary Duties","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Commonwealth; Law; Duty; Duty of care; Extinguishment; Settlement (finance); Tort; Equity (law); Project commissioning; Political science; High Court; Economic Justice; Sociology; Publishing; Business; Liability","score_opus":0.08877325669289206,"score_gpt":0.28074946650017363,"score_spread":0.19197620980728158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123311483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07114301,0.015500136,0.0052998126,0.23926878,0.006618432,0.0001839023,0.00017583545,0.000120100834,0.66168994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5628049,0.008230519,0.006475222,0.048800506,0.0005767142,0.00009196955,0.000095202784,0.00008965027,0.3728353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929791,0.0010386138,0.00020954471,0.0006443994,0.0027696793,0.0023587006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945944,0.0006714443,0.00020153531,0.00037569864,0.0020067447,0.0021501917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005497986,0.00038273132,0.00035264617,0.002137536,0.021264728,0.007814743,0.0026128402,0.005603879,0.012881342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105909705,0.00031928974,0.00042864337,0.0023782335,0.014545686,0.0036548455,0.0054398505,0.0074818484,0.0009356314],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045677054,0.000071539536,0.003224778,0.00010714784,0.000008916746,0.00063076976,0.033793777,0.00023351962,0.0002286878,0.7445438,0.103254154,0.11385724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015217692,0.000044429646,0.0073574875,0.0003028214,0.000012423115,0.00060546753,0.018697444,0.0003552808,0.00013770195,0.031895813,0.94050145,0.000074396296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84970367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9385483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94766176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052338224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11026243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3797422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312332631","doi":"","title":"The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Law; Recklessness; Damages; Punishment (psychology); Malice; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Strict liability; Legal liability; Political science; Common law; Harm; Liability; Public law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04235538640228112,"score_gpt":0.3418535535635373,"score_spread":0.2994981671612562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W312332631","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061960135,0.42047048,0.0190363,0.1462439,0.006145145,0.000038763446,0.0006262219,0.00008839148,0.3453907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7954862,0.1262394,0.00607663,0.037298184,0.012284786,0.000102408994,0.00048490774,0.00012664663,0.0219008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477863,0.0014613443,0.0004161792,0.0014432658,0.0013813009,0.0005193748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910981,0.004319576,0.0018921191,0.0007708027,0.0012439964,0.00067538454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005717408,0.00044281708,0.00084858557,0.0042130845,0.0016306466,0.013794839,0.0024066519,0.009564579,0.005904029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012340539,0.00028848732,0.0006627698,0.0057846545,0.0140350275,0.015846016,0.003628735,0.006239364,0.00073424954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045314184,0.00004925779,0.00402461,0.0002130622,0.000028822491,0.00027174642,0.00092541624,0.00029254679,0.00008449027,0.92324036,0.011087809,0.059736546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002148861,0.00015515431,0.030350294,0.0030855427,0.0000480471,0.0023742311,0.0028643704,0.0009096255,0.00027798608,0.35580212,0.60401577,0.0000953638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00359918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023378346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013794839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037204677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026307104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0302369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123354388","doi":"","title":"Conduct of laws: Native title, responsibility, and some limits of jurisdictional thinking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Harvard University","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous; Common law; Political science; High Court; Authorization; Project commissioning; Publishing; Computer science","score_opus":0.04742674431407897,"score_gpt":0.31034181384467624,"score_spread":0.2629150695305973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123354388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124162786,0.025378244,0.024657652,0.260053,0.0009090955,0.0000530365,0.00004819128,0.00007777615,0.56466013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775268,0.002433776,0.0023784318,0.0062223645,0.0003180798,0.000051193263,0.000009945954,0.000023347251,0.01103598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781477,0.013916175,0.00074443955,0.0017523285,0.0036706552,0.0017687833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98507744,0.0103294,0.000964096,0.001064801,0.0013815525,0.0011826803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01900892,0.00023234963,0.0005326993,0.0016657781,0.011904736,0.015950408,0.002308501,0.0061669694,0.0019548538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019691378,0.0004828311,0.00056104164,0.0011327033,0.09683562,0.01717464,0.0078957565,0.009533898,0.0002716398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001939295,0.000004405373,0.00016751957,0.000014587041,0.0000012056398,0.000051174356,0.029889476,0.000041972413,0.000025277901,0.9670358,0.0008069088,0.0019597893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095389005,0.000019656356,0.001188505,0.00043478992,0.000008436503,0.00015604639,0.038097613,0.0005123859,0.00013025885,0.87372303,0.08569104,0.00002866334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04392867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032574438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04392867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013358379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01493063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10052997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123407248","doi":"","title":"The Ultrahazardous Activity of Excluding Family Members in Canada’s Immigration System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Immigration; Immigration law; Government (linguistics); Tort; Law; Family member; Political science; Refugee; Liability; Immigration policy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03402826484743648,"score_gpt":0.2806383058229981,"score_spread":0.2466100409755616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123407248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7223202,0.0023688718,0.0022334007,0.06759319,0.0002658049,0.00010649553,0.0003205687,0.000048256177,0.20474319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831799,0.0006915268,0.000504625,0.004130601,0.00002859983,0.000013347336,0.000048859183,0.000013040831,0.011389608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99404186,0.00085239345,0.00016843874,0.0004810258,0.0014317689,0.0030245243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938019,0.0013091138,0.000750746,0.00037672304,0.0015713522,0.002190114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029870067,0.00018824919,0.0003261042,0.0011024226,0.034219597,0.007560847,0.0022113621,0.0024762836,0.0033692408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009632078,0.0003429701,0.00034436054,0.0013969942,0.013142505,0.0017761278,0.004650351,0.0037627725,0.00018202246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013289413,0.00010909451,0.16844098,0.00016853982,0.000071160575,0.0036569836,0.1692287,0.0014611628,0.0014461457,0.5265043,0.050307274,0.07847284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061512925,0.00011075906,0.3203694,0.0011448343,0.00022011339,0.00181207,0.21635826,0.0032153896,0.0019825941,0.044643726,0.40976018,0.00032120277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087159365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087159365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.155464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6323884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123480558","doi":"","title":"Punitive damages and European law: quo vademus?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Plaintiff; Tort; Law; Political science; Common law; Harm; Business; Liability","score_opus":0.037061641887971716,"score_gpt":0.23940960631502695,"score_spread":0.20234796442705522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123480558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01595873,0.11182996,0.0077432236,0.091778934,0.0048852926,0.000027696538,0.00010563146,0.00006548132,0.76760495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7267169,0.047525674,0.006616995,0.09047708,0.007496305,0.00012720651,0.0001936511,0.00015321588,0.12069293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904045,0.004025556,0.0005461716,0.0020427539,0.0017566474,0.0012244034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942549,0.0023218815,0.000996521,0.0011265452,0.0009330005,0.000367161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008848974,0.00057577394,0.0009525084,0.002488895,0.0046291864,0.0152234025,0.0018653078,0.01268519,0.00848193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013227004,0.000365077,0.00090800074,0.0027481592,0.027689751,0.0131660765,0.0063347933,0.009394308,0.0013390502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017060382,0.00001950119,0.00031065708,0.00005189423,0.000008011909,0.000064554406,0.000615004,0.00011338871,0.000046048757,0.97503,0.0064687934,0.017255126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026714273,0.000060716662,0.0032877768,0.0009620505,0.00002082473,0.0005930787,0.0007638207,0.0003338907,0.00019452894,0.57682264,0.4168819,0.000052077343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007402783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045830635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0152234025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005759564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003066469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046798468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123527755","doi":"","title":"Corporate Law Federalism in Historical Context: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Federalism; Statute; Corporate governance; Regulatory competition; Political science; Federal law; Common law; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Competition law; Law; Political economy; Economics; Legislation; Market economy; Monopoly; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.0372461504406499,"score_gpt":0.26847891192514123,"score_spread":0.23123276148449134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123527755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3803975,0.04542446,0.0010388709,0.05367585,0.00093380705,0.00006152635,0.002274431,0.00006615214,0.51612735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747283,0.013401324,0.00038251365,0.002741568,0.00011990869,0.000013548145,0.00044969752,0.000030005687,0.008133133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614066,0.000328359,0.000074180505,0.00032611858,0.0014347823,0.0016959704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945181,0.0008692496,0.00050030946,0.000094346564,0.003121095,0.0008968972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017734928,0.00024414808,0.00032497974,0.007908084,0.02285116,0.009242028,0.0010488523,0.0014656808,0.0039906627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067815413,0.00027365747,0.0002862454,0.014425002,0.010191646,0.0026001984,0.0025597725,0.0030911758,0.00017081267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010417161,0.000056240766,0.04322928,0.00030487237,0.00006914184,0.0012273451,0.11089318,0.00085282954,0.00046401648,0.7202861,0.052797996,0.069714874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013242667,0.000033092416,0.15017225,0.0009098696,0.00009023056,0.0004964556,0.102637805,0.00050393277,0.0004622508,0.0096958075,0.7348508,0.0001342009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99606305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20270179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20270179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14470021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9247529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123532847","doi":"","title":"Proprietary Remedies in Insolvency: A Comparison of the Restatement (Third) of Restitution & Unjust Enrichment with English and Commonwealth Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Commonwealth; Unjust enrichment; Misrepresentation; Common law; Political science; Private law; English law; Tort; Mistake; Fiduciary; Pleading; Civil law (Civil law); Plaintiff; Sociology; Public law; Liability; Duty","score_opus":0.06400497655399724,"score_gpt":0.331066101320112,"score_spread":0.26706112476611477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123532847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11600286,0.0233079,0.0036783842,0.04390563,0.0006150628,0.00011717981,0.00008248609,0.000055861656,0.81223464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626157,0.0040642894,0.0007567515,0.00793037,0.00042903586,0.00010320189,0.000033085176,0.000034088956,0.024033345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98011786,0.008196428,0.00084044837,0.0010335115,0.007202619,0.0026091868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97888386,0.0149343815,0.0027142558,0.0011289173,0.001680589,0.0006579531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009435827,0.0002445644,0.00058701966,0.0035932339,0.0051523224,0.010163732,0.0015834399,0.006274188,0.01120001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034540743,0.00029706693,0.0011144334,0.0032878672,0.018836526,0.00806721,0.006530272,0.0058808485,0.00059438084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003083967,0.000056919213,0.0014363336,0.00007756398,0.0000115512075,0.0002020166,0.0057171807,0.00014810821,0.00005663921,0.97060645,0.0071620354,0.014494301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015265067,0.0004255161,0.08446932,0.0033205934,0.00020607574,0.0012911735,0.03322691,0.0028701965,0.0010909706,0.38496992,0.48783484,0.00014188566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015355879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021647971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015355879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011687341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008202642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08479798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123764048","doi":"","title":"Public Institutions as Defamation Plaintiffs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Political science; Law; Normative; Plaintiff; Institution; Reputation; Humanities; Public institution; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05850864799577541,"score_gpt":0.31402973982863563,"score_spread":0.2555210918328602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123764048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18544467,0.0024571242,0.017423695,0.028065788,0.0004126108,0.00013348715,0.000109277345,0.00016374447,0.76578957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693378,0.00048512733,0.0013898653,0.0028669708,0.0002035297,0.00005982393,0.000028014001,0.000017483564,0.025611378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886713,0.0030794577,0.0004896613,0.0011068553,0.003421024,0.0032317745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852696,0.007852875,0.00238493,0.001826111,0.0015958184,0.0010706438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011395358,0.0003250566,0.0006151027,0.0018678858,0.0073762746,0.011322078,0.0011455673,0.010830391,0.011186483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021078499,0.0006179064,0.0007284248,0.0011539838,0.014046534,0.008260695,0.0078926,0.008021618,0.0012782807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010124544,0.00001956232,0.00089923764,0.000008396504,0.0000035430103,0.00014599635,0.0015486322,0.000109977904,0.000119880046,0.9931206,0.0013148737,0.0026991346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001046616,0.00016132809,0.0061195903,0.00041478086,0.0001360322,0.000990878,0.0065754037,0.0044184094,0.0028945121,0.76491946,0.21314664,0.00011826722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012211226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015133748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012211226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006538835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006768414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060265064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123793227","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2037","title":"How tort law empowers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Delict; Redress; Political science; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Scrutiny; Sociology; Law and economics; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.011350819186203726,"score_gpt":0.2362524998717011,"score_spread":0.22490168068549737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123793227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044007238,0.0037069877,0.026295535,0.07074319,0.0005482629,0.00005042078,0.00012238066,0.00020858212,0.8543174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94000065,0.0019968685,0.0029000023,0.008325001,0.00073419756,0.00005797574,0.00007266892,0.000106477615,0.045806248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98989934,0.003925979,0.00033647678,0.0018130568,0.0023566964,0.0016684919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99169123,0.003941668,0.0007060699,0.0018904171,0.0009182272,0.0008523728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00921182,0.00048911944,0.0006810815,0.002119142,0.007029147,0.010953696,0.0010577353,0.0052241464,0.014895422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013230483,0.0007264979,0.0006771,0.0009971875,0.059714604,0.015974218,0.011046408,0.0061372304,0.0020921852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018295042,0.000006669456,0.00016072439,0.000008385228,0.0000020631435,0.000022869446,0.0025012465,0.00005110463,0.00004085615,0.99400073,0.0015181674,0.0016853027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011769457,0.00001462806,0.0005054074,0.000098922035,0.000011543796,0.00015875998,0.0022759303,0.00015290662,0.00014678853,0.8625091,0.13410011,0.000014187308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009427588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010016908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014895422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060590925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008368712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04983008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123888961","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Takings Clauses in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Constitution; Property rights; Lease; Just compensation; Property law; Land law; Law and economics; China; Law; Public property; Political science; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Business; Private property; Land tenure; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0168756007373681,"score_gpt":0.29083129755192555,"score_spread":0.27395569681455745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123888961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7893382,0.00168134,0.009818788,0.008989121,0.00030119534,0.00062056823,0.0003627139,0.00028661048,0.18860143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665101,0.00053674233,0.0041796416,0.0016634172,0.00008422335,0.00020037191,0.00018612332,0.000026667101,0.02661274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935976,0.0007721967,0.00056679733,0.0010414127,0.002543887,0.0014780809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607384,0.0013535352,0.0006223686,0.0006294611,0.0009918077,0.0003290181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070699654,0.0004984739,0.00054489396,0.0017524777,0.0072768596,0.0032565284,0.0022320664,0.0025141945,0.004498354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070240437,0.0006293509,0.0006577258,0.0023874717,0.006362805,0.0026115035,0.0033361763,0.0028003051,0.00029736533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007363525,0.00014283459,0.021226263,0.00015933711,0.00004077892,0.002055555,0.009574822,0.0051364996,0.0046584406,0.91142035,0.008151406,0.037360102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007336643,0.0004765729,0.0842844,0.0006367156,0.0005252456,0.0009328483,0.0073426315,0.05494721,0.017860472,0.4497481,0.38186333,0.0006488621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26141518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2422365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26141518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013984225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043394443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5197872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123910214","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1520765","title":"A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The U.K. Or Canada as a Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029291514693326904,"score_gpt":0.3362573757446984,"score_spread":0.30696586105137147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123910214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06608588,0.0018494559,0.025351191,0.114262685,0.0012883043,0.00023695837,0.00083968416,0.00018947126,0.78989637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.879243,0.0010237132,0.020356761,0.012552328,0.00025710548,0.000219047,0.00023135355,0.00009929964,0.08601745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960008,0.00073441776,0.00012926677,0.00061705674,0.0013691504,0.0011493064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965024,0.00048692175,0.00020430738,0.00052404794,0.0016132732,0.0006689826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003966403,0.00035967302,0.0007488614,0.0010709995,0.0075124158,0.009984819,0.0026073833,0.004995698,0.009945133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098389145,0.0004211409,0.00052851567,0.0012597014,0.011696537,0.0077639963,0.0028820469,0.0071160295,0.0008301297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008843035,0.0000057012007,0.00010411463,0.000008392932,0.0000019307038,0.0000136220215,0.0001922302,0.00022248602,0.000037460006,0.99160236,0.0056522987,0.0021506723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005224876,0.00003031702,0.0021811838,0.00023129603,0.00003250545,0.00006647922,0.0011680516,0.004625727,0.00031020847,0.84310883,0.1481083,0.00008488206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.766005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84916484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23399502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032358244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.079718255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4707461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123928056","doi":"","title":"Protecting Individual Self-Interest in Aggregate as the Basis of Fairness in Contract","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Unconscionability; Law and economics; Mistake; Excuse; Premise; Frustration of purpose; Business; Exclusion clause; Order (exchange); Contract management; Economics; Law; Privity of contract; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03851352461494153,"score_gpt":0.3301190831894587,"score_spread":0.2916055585745172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123928056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108415715,0.0018026902,0.3929286,0.030763911,0.00050519814,0.00045116304,0.0001475209,0.00028951225,0.46469572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509522,0.0004659763,0.03470345,0.002043289,0.00030124534,0.0002887893,0.00003791532,0.00007182394,0.011135391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738884,0.009345877,0.0014953002,0.004270917,0.008238187,0.002761278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811001,0.007152911,0.0021784813,0.006034043,0.0024805856,0.001053902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028315201,0.00059990626,0.0017029771,0.0012372367,0.0061599533,0.011589439,0.0029372077,0.007200769,0.00331704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035786625,0.0006053446,0.0014340128,0.0012451089,0.02735659,0.0100438455,0.008569286,0.008096651,0.00073954335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009550235,0.000009856493,0.0003344149,0.00001023446,0.000010592753,0.00003352417,0.0008183396,0.0010647627,0.00014343197,0.9946831,0.00025338566,0.0026288356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012814593,0.000021614369,0.00044809407,0.00004316309,0.00001715281,0.000034382534,0.00019391402,0.0026599762,0.00019999816,0.98917574,0.0071738344,0.000019215493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077540474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007130359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028315201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069580935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118513275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1497469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124101900","doi":"","title":"Punitive Damages: A Comparative Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Working Paper Series","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.055976559127013804,"score_gpt":0.33893352445554137,"score_spread":0.28295696532852754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124101900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19338578,0.049359072,0.0050001554,0.0038428176,0.0003478044,0.00022819404,0.0011994629,0.000044807446,0.7465919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461891,0.031178147,0.0025768743,0.0011115808,0.00023739619,0.00017488995,0.0007296706,0.000038969185,0.017763315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924695,0.003202403,0.0003861476,0.00037876118,0.0028175772,0.0007455782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98874027,0.006419195,0.0015038498,0.00052777654,0.0025491603,0.00025979817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00436348,0.00031523907,0.00069825567,0.011919918,0.0028135653,0.0030892764,0.00084054767,0.0014027995,0.013974089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014032329,0.0002622443,0.0011740112,0.013379555,0.0026617353,0.0030030664,0.0025380298,0.0014112607,0.0006736282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044065397,0.00046539985,0.03937581,0.0020451373,0.00048718415,0.0015796612,0.0056781527,0.005630068,0.0004948137,0.7953091,0.02151969,0.12697427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018421565,0.0013627457,0.35018206,0.0038177017,0.000890185,0.0055601555,0.022733806,0.0043191225,0.0013808003,0.09489336,0.51448256,0.00019331153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0146736475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02856007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146736475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006728768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022185906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048820853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124134379","doi":"10.29173/alr150","title":"&lt;i&gt;Fullowka v. Pinkerton’s of Canada Ltd.&lt;/i&gt; and the Material Contribution Test for Factual Causation in Negligence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Duty of care; Duty; Liability; Law; Supreme court; Test (biology); Tort; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.020722269570043583,"score_gpt":0.2677110012084302,"score_spread":0.24698873163838664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124134379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016125826,0.018452454,0.0027250594,0.14250025,0.0017467388,0.00026404663,0.002028262,0.00010887791,0.8160485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.432776,0.010469648,0.0044157943,0.12534529,0.00076021027,0.00020923455,0.00075679744,0.00010348195,0.4251636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991687,0.0007316652,0.00033376453,0.00060373696,0.0045187934,0.0021251116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945215,0.0022780295,0.0002603903,0.00019527217,0.0021565326,0.00058823865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053139767,0.0004317284,0.0005027777,0.0019914536,0.009942819,0.0059491093,0.0021598993,0.011851847,0.010139458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014670704,0.0008329882,0.00076720945,0.0019517674,0.00679402,0.0016751377,0.001212604,0.006860782,0.001399445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032977707,0.000016991065,0.0015723335,0.00012403664,0.000021915033,0.00040243173,0.0013253931,0.00029029738,0.00034291245,0.73884225,0.24806656,0.008961903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008306992,0.000036179357,0.012442712,0.00067005167,0.00009707098,0.00020845809,0.0018146309,0.00084209465,0.0010099335,0.10416235,0.8784667,0.00016678157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96098936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97747225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044372004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044372004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084558584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32194293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124135338","doi":"","title":"Deferred Prosecution Agreements and the Presumption of Innocence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Law; Framing (construction); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02238962805129889,"score_gpt":0.33931882282714465,"score_spread":0.31692919477584575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124135338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14824794,0.002967358,0.08701835,0.09324944,0.00062322256,0.00023919025,0.00012779712,0.000085626605,0.6674411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790035,0.0003504448,0.006552921,0.004590068,0.00019519406,0.00016415998,0.00001766622,0.000016486998,0.009109564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.967405,0.016723882,0.001530489,0.004631185,0.005815913,0.003893568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95634174,0.026725227,0.00445633,0.006287424,0.0037702622,0.0024190298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035127975,0.00042664853,0.0011281203,0.0018609707,0.011615467,0.013281728,0.0030920592,0.012576389,0.0035635857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051571906,0.0008119978,0.0010946863,0.0011632888,0.06410768,0.011490235,0.010420718,0.0136159165,0.0006876699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037481389,0.000009682369,0.00012575879,0.0000045370307,0.0000017516115,0.000047544025,0.00057507755,0.000124345,0.000019701836,0.99815935,0.00025874187,0.0006697966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024915551,0.000019113108,0.00021453787,0.000061034694,0.000005855278,0.00005462403,0.00048510561,0.00073931366,0.00012097265,0.9881698,0.010090857,0.000013930714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010031824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006855111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035127975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008199209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014633721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18577677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124185421","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3189","title":"Unreasonable Disagreement?: Judicial–Executive Exchanges about Charter Reasonableness in the Harper Era","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Separation of powers","score_opus":0.04362164220324371,"score_gpt":0.34413296860989434,"score_spread":0.3005113264066506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124185421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5211581,0.002585481,0.0052789496,0.12080045,0.00035521624,0.00007030847,0.00007815111,0.000047282036,0.34962603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906212,0.00020194218,0.00026397168,0.005993661,0.0000743624,0.0000125141405,0.000010312932,0.000011679934,0.0028102854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741683,0.011561264,0.00079014286,0.0020869114,0.006436354,0.00495696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9372647,0.0494261,0.0049681426,0.0022168744,0.0047995355,0.0013247007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03444324,0.00021783002,0.0006647092,0.0022907753,0.022549102,0.02058693,0.0017183372,0.00852369,0.0034880221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08089118,0.00049596693,0.00033946696,0.0030949956,0.025100548,0.009290457,0.0055866023,0.0117079755,0.00021655603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009877986,0.00005193254,0.0048341756,0.000048998263,0.000033963257,0.0008663839,0.1316847,0.00034729386,0.00050249876,0.832861,0.012307542,0.016362632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012714443,0.00008002192,0.030965105,0.0006350642,0.0001696101,0.0002807728,0.26147413,0.0021915357,0.002166625,0.419664,0.28202313,0.00022285133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16634522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2423118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02847289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024313103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33075398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124215937","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3502451","title":"The Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Performance: A Scottish-Canadian Comparison","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Good faith; Faith; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.013385996024141037,"score_gpt":0.3117867513802123,"score_spread":0.29840075535607125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124215937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39301977,0.004768318,0.0015355385,0.014616314,0.00013807185,0.00013202,0.00077689614,0.000043071686,0.58497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98893017,0.00096746103,0.00039340707,0.00085246866,0.000020260286,0.000018958668,0.00014512712,0.000020992136,0.008651173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857349,0.0020351915,0.0003815891,0.0006782894,0.007238193,0.003931856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97823995,0.004195607,0.0011600234,0.0010893324,0.012798661,0.0025165046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010569975,0.00044490257,0.00089861295,0.0052835788,0.019463286,0.007226111,0.0024831966,0.0022754376,0.012876832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030170001,0.00026084765,0.0010045939,0.009817087,0.010333403,0.0021508457,0.003736737,0.002714912,0.00057183893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011823539,0.00023694485,0.049547575,0.00032071432,0.00023177784,0.0007392063,0.03082037,0.0024976816,0.00060735847,0.80782676,0.026415166,0.079574116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042818266,0.000535043,0.6354537,0.0008955207,0.0005341901,0.0007593412,0.0728985,0.0046645193,0.0010340101,0.072591394,0.20978896,0.00041659895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07839342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07839342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083454594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56878674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124239048","doi":"","title":"Pseudo-Contract and Shared Meaning Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Severability; Frustration of purpose; Exclusion clause; Unconscionability; Contract theory; Law; Obligation; Law and economics; Contract management; Sociology; Political science; Privity of contract; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02490840732855197,"score_gpt":0.31745163871863824,"score_spread":0.29254323139008626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124239048","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05148375,0.0023990895,0.6314699,0.021303324,0.00036639214,0.00044504402,0.000479766,0.000317006,0.29173574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86274385,0.000747666,0.121590294,0.0012824311,0.00025751314,0.0007892996,0.00034258925,0.00019202018,0.012054163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97255015,0.017142275,0.0010645774,0.002817514,0.0053421226,0.0010833103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982781,0.010603192,0.0013531246,0.0026626887,0.0020368884,0.00056301075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017795052,0.000678248,0.0009876522,0.004258103,0.006712798,0.009284521,0.0034923875,0.003414174,0.008672542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025798773,0.00046046756,0.001471942,0.0044508427,0.040165063,0.023746725,0.008678824,0.005523759,0.0007977057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004532097,0.0000034631782,0.00008579328,0.000012838451,0.0000025536604,0.000037688093,0.0021604693,0.00009853308,0.000026551375,0.9952586,0.0003340015,0.0019749682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036582758,0.000002939535,0.0000737827,0.00002595998,0.0000028450984,0.00003452066,0.0010562147,0.001133435,0.00007277096,0.9905255,0.0070629395,0.0000054678085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038787094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027404232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017795052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008574416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006064617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09411037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124319938","doi":"","title":"The republican virtues of the&#13;\\n“new commonwealth model of&#13;\\nconstitutionalism”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Democracy; Politics; Legislature; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13269551133350532,"score_gpt":0.3662191529234123,"score_spread":0.23352364158990696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124319938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03698724,0.0012997726,0.044081528,0.0907654,0.0006683928,0.000045760986,0.00005091432,0.000072233386,0.82602876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93228704,0.00053199165,0.0051994445,0.01111598,0.00037430145,0.000101921316,0.000032072247,0.000058169462,0.050299007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029607,0.004090733,0.00021490396,0.0016205823,0.0026616722,0.0011160576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958145,0.0015091017,0.00042016327,0.0012225566,0.0006932661,0.00034039325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005878535,0.00018864017,0.0003089292,0.0006717425,0.0055156862,0.00825531,0.0013508938,0.0031125129,0.0040693334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008478538,0.00025675027,0.0005445861,0.00052527705,0.033673942,0.0057422207,0.004911526,0.006940038,0.00077872537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015554,0.000002365508,0.000069278176,0.0000021796277,6.8521024e-7,0.000008327889,0.0006141394,0.00003911008,0.000016803768,0.99763536,0.00090958463,0.0007006339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012738675,0.00001560116,0.0008493426,0.000052682946,0.0000057876427,0.00008752163,0.0009295701,0.0011092941,0.00032459857,0.85482955,0.14176126,0.000022001832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02171641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03209697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02171641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007946207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008307969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057654023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124428142","doi":"","title":"Precedent Revisited: Carter v Canada (AG) and the Contemporary Practice of Precedent","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Hierarchy; Common law","score_opus":0.016948087358760515,"score_gpt":0.27993513822330585,"score_spread":0.2629870508645453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124428142","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038430255,0.04228234,0.007321613,0.48991683,0.0026446562,0.00009082132,0.00020430629,0.00009969987,0.41900948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83312356,0.014878477,0.0043059527,0.109250806,0.0009938756,0.000056634526,0.00006910301,0.000068522626,0.037253033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98540556,0.002812655,0.0003327231,0.0017124987,0.0058929664,0.003843567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98781234,0.00558268,0.0005596865,0.00033707722,0.0040706587,0.0016376205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008826126,0.00028068424,0.0005519623,0.0028250564,0.030752916,0.012238456,0.0033108313,0.01097247,0.0034462842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026055772,0.00050628156,0.0006075204,0.0042648106,0.040472593,0.0045879083,0.0034871935,0.013082342,0.000295203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007045571,0.0000049169125,0.0004145689,0.000046172216,0.0000035553362,0.00021315149,0.0038859705,0.00020398402,0.00006994146,0.9627754,0.023475017,0.008900293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042991003,0.000031719534,0.0045525036,0.0011035688,0.000037755744,0.00036340678,0.008021615,0.0009412984,0.00038767065,0.24580315,0.73849595,0.00021829322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96910995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9800076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123875484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.123875484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18774149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89878374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124528875","doi":"10.1111/1467-6281.00116/pdf","title":"Commonwealth Convergence Toward a Narrower Scope of Auditor Liability to Third Parties for Negligent Misstatements","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Commonwealth; Audit; Scope (computer science); Accounting; Business; Convergence (economics); Balance (ability); Law and economics; Legal liability; Political science; Law; Economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.055161085043978736,"score_gpt":0.25485811333399216,"score_spread":0.19969702829001343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124528875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5383713,0.005076445,0.013820039,0.053815454,0.00020719264,0.00006170226,0.000047668716,0.00007630861,0.38852388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865079,0.0005325869,0.0014882276,0.0033310978,0.0001407571,0.000020551595,0.000010367989,0.0000097273105,0.007958744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98952466,0.0026429417,0.00073413743,0.0014981002,0.0032916856,0.0023084318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869773,0.0057409117,0.002168924,0.0014047833,0.0023428637,0.0013652515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122122625,0.00016981864,0.00046770702,0.0036956507,0.0055771107,0.009659358,0.0010934768,0.0046201143,0.0025208173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015942415,0.00038024486,0.0005548788,0.0014490044,0.020807702,0.005065078,0.009177398,0.0072885253,0.00026989775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016249285,0.000025488567,0.0031487332,0.00001671283,0.00000830314,0.00032511968,0.0065260692,0.0005709353,0.00096088235,0.9744666,0.0013463048,0.0125887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003992402,0.00019070692,0.04506533,0.0008297171,0.000057585134,0.0013012819,0.008811353,0.002857546,0.0032129162,0.7648767,0.172619,0.00013783661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013090422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021199074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013090422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010461846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010811205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075906396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124532658","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalizing Leviathan: A Critique of Buchanan’s Conception of Lawmaking","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Normative; Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Positivism; Politics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Economics; Legislature","score_opus":0.016266327779874603,"score_gpt":0.32376778504982184,"score_spread":0.30750145726994726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124532658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018877264,0.015697306,0.13022745,0.0923629,0.0009557757,0.00011704078,0.00012844868,0.00015422149,0.74147964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9095156,0.0050428845,0.028283365,0.012544744,0.0012161849,0.0004506299,0.00006790525,0.00023303831,0.042645678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993786,0.0030422523,0.00022482961,0.0011617724,0.0012671505,0.00051796617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603707,0.0026937416,0.00023059093,0.0005170124,0.0003761358,0.00014548472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01013939,0.00065013766,0.0007542367,0.0026878202,0.00791757,0.011202899,0.0029124457,0.006216795,0.003050457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010461906,0.0005294376,0.00092886126,0.0019018385,0.06606113,0.01135006,0.0052476437,0.012133599,0.00064079626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.679804e-7,8.7255023e-7,0.0000044225544,0.0000028574673,3.8513318e-7,0.0000033259043,0.00025556367,0.00005723973,0.000007397026,0.9991703,0.00018272817,0.0003141575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041275143,0.000002352691,0.000014337348,0.000024235787,0.000001311029,0.000009465227,0.00009101808,0.00016315571,0.000042037453,0.9855012,0.014142476,0.0000042524725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014027573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011288952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014027573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013090225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096031185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09497666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124631602","doi":"","title":"\"Government Wrongs\": Civil liability for Gmo regulation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Agricoltura Istituzioni Mercati","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Liability; Government regulation; Business; Legal liability; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.016516023227273087,"score_gpt":0.2574022066911738,"score_spread":0.24088618346390073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124631602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28185478,0.003909884,0.0029578796,0.2921632,0.000688985,0.00028820796,0.000881823,0.00014368989,0.4171116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8641201,0.0017758826,0.0012017564,0.035527978,0.00014798915,0.00007254433,0.00014597503,0.00006561314,0.096942104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98298097,0.001649321,0.0005336635,0.0013148056,0.0073696855,0.00615163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96567965,0.013700474,0.0022177175,0.0009992676,0.01265527,0.0047475668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080155535,0.00038783217,0.0007543615,0.0030343498,0.034345277,0.016315551,0.004036555,0.018593641,0.008676503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04400885,0.0010342825,0.00093857606,0.00377061,0.013083777,0.003620039,0.004673295,0.015990455,0.00041297424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001241111,0.00016451381,0.024714826,0.00012578597,0.00007580264,0.0018761398,0.015726522,0.0036436766,0.0004735615,0.79428536,0.13353725,0.025252515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003483064,0.00012957708,0.13501225,0.0012605808,0.0004642177,0.0010419664,0.051206715,0.023302596,0.0022885513,0.2134755,0.5706356,0.00083419407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16862068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16862068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36574963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96428216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124649254","doi":"","title":"‘Losses in Any Event’ in the Case of Damage to Property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Appeal; Property (philosophy); Relevance (law); Position (finance); Event (particle physics); Law; Common law; Law and economics; Forensic engineering; Political science; Business; Philosophy; Economics; Engineering; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.035819992935596956,"score_gpt":0.34735746949233404,"score_spread":0.3115374765567371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124649254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12232884,0.005225536,0.08174589,0.067031994,0.001942363,0.00034177647,0.00052726385,0.000139499,0.7207167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93801856,0.000955616,0.006914905,0.011494814,0.0012246516,0.00022276948,0.00020830386,0.000047410595,0.040913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98646754,0.003283654,0.0012586013,0.0024967503,0.004776545,0.0017169449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99360716,0.0029729258,0.0009663927,0.0012284857,0.0009444754,0.00028055965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009433549,0.0005372669,0.00072853384,0.0010089148,0.003284714,0.0045442455,0.0026018533,0.006340583,0.0036616726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018963093,0.00049285486,0.0010118117,0.00076080183,0.01660388,0.009845955,0.0052890046,0.008285335,0.0012720362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045028813,0.000038698687,0.0018821101,0.000055358927,0.000022226941,0.00078910805,0.0024717913,0.0006061329,0.0004105811,0.9741459,0.0084544765,0.011078609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002537101,0.00015963944,0.0067345686,0.00016878676,0.000043930293,0.0023081002,0.0014829698,0.00164564,0.0010670278,0.84226286,0.14402923,0.00007180604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003438553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041519357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009433549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019511154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016927867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04988998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124870402","doi":"","title":"The Deformation of Contract in the Information Society","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; State (computer science); Social contract; Law and economics; Contract management; Contract theory; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Marketing; Politics","score_opus":0.02603779739467411,"score_gpt":0.33891125789828164,"score_spread":0.31287346050360754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124870402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020978697,0.030222123,0.026135402,0.33325887,0.006561414,0.00003437761,0.00008191656,0.00009731897,0.5826298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83092433,0.022359155,0.005863197,0.013478641,0.0036802758,0.000084024585,0.000064430096,0.00010836209,0.12343771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993903,0.0033778711,0.00017494081,0.0003957665,0.0014009334,0.00074744876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946079,0.0034727291,0.00031479873,0.00051546725,0.00052968727,0.0005594386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056139985,0.00029089986,0.00042078918,0.0008030216,0.005131744,0.011605077,0.00065873726,0.002428214,0.005916417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112381205,0.00036370032,0.00036792335,0.0011826955,0.024370687,0.009660768,0.0035119606,0.006192021,0.0010933512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070358906,0.000003557376,0.000037430265,0.000010829501,0.0000012838775,0.000023255881,0.0010759705,0.0002555671,0.000030658382,0.9803801,0.012337403,0.005836885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004457935,0.000013255899,0.0001894019,0.000088816276,0.0000021100614,0.00004929952,0.0012649905,0.0007218974,0.000092014,0.7660358,0.23152514,0.000012872697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010865019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057535516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011645682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011645682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064727254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08449578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124884400","doi":"","title":"To Recognize or Not? Good Faith Under Nigerian Law of Contract","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Good faith; Supreme court; Duty; Jurisdiction; Political science; Faith; Scholarship; Uniform Commercial Code; Meaning (existential); Bad faith; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03565191012799302,"score_gpt":0.3205903600874097,"score_spread":0.2849384499594167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124884400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17162757,0.0068207197,0.01434794,0.16325895,0.0011486181,0.00006542297,0.000026533766,0.00002431223,0.64268005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98104846,0.0011070448,0.0015663186,0.005526597,0.000087757784,0.00002260531,0.0000041112717,0.0000062292024,0.010630899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966993,0.0014122045,0.00012535001,0.000348813,0.00074985484,0.0006644689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746835,0.0013760749,0.00033391773,0.00021017472,0.0003874563,0.00022408985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039551985,0.0001280154,0.00021917294,0.000400799,0.005793453,0.0062622596,0.00041623137,0.0038849248,0.0015333731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007569142,0.00015397235,0.0001337734,0.0004136348,0.020910524,0.004821089,0.0024565414,0.0041538286,0.000236259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003666004,0.000005004973,0.00041476605,0.000009560748,6.8487975e-7,0.00012267767,0.0059388224,0.000036248923,0.00007320661,0.9873865,0.001428911,0.0045799515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000951168,0.000034556502,0.0023117352,0.00054469093,0.000009059401,0.00069856975,0.032689188,0.00070675137,0.0005372542,0.8293725,0.13304842,0.00003771566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01757638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020804262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01757638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041128835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007438329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03494811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124890122","doi":"","title":"The Metamorphosis of Aboriginal Title","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Generative grammar; Law; Colonialism; Subject (documents); Negotiation; Political science; Exclusive right; Economic Justice; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.008431629780228668,"score_gpt":0.3249126960227492,"score_spread":0.31648106624252054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124890122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04625751,0.0044958307,0.008943582,0.013597471,0.0011341437,0.00009971764,0.0001032201,0.00007042035,0.9252981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80621994,0.0038803227,0.007817781,0.0048976685,0.0007241592,0.00010096439,0.00010723093,0.00014291998,0.17610905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99120796,0.0027895977,0.0005176409,0.0014453691,0.0030455666,0.000993726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575293,0.0012749123,0.0003713913,0.00088002306,0.0011809872,0.0005397598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006537939,0.00019877977,0.00039736764,0.0014756942,0.0056144563,0.0077282875,0.0010646055,0.0023706148,0.0062658694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008960136,0.00057172915,0.00038839233,0.0011456192,0.024280649,0.0067520086,0.0060481466,0.0073105185,0.0009350851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010795153,0.0000062256886,0.00047745812,0.00003351358,0.000003291419,0.00017894385,0.020515822,0.000033480195,0.00028964048,0.9658722,0.00230318,0.010275439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001784412,0.00010194562,0.007454465,0.0006482184,0.000021422298,0.0013128951,0.012186944,0.0003599097,0.0010800658,0.26392817,0.71282554,0.00006267751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03548137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043123167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03548137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008701285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00744844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07054967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124976738","doi":"","title":"Private Rights to Common Property: The Evolution of Common Property in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Property rights; Property law; Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Common law; Intangible property; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013170492771549754,"score_gpt":0.26211475264800843,"score_spread":0.24894425987645868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124976738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15340483,0.008252403,0.009243518,0.11113811,0.00042111299,0.00011456135,0.0003917342,0.00007429957,0.7169594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95413697,0.0026122937,0.0015408653,0.0068604033,0.00006720808,0.000029273044,0.00007477158,0.000035795965,0.03464255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913961,0.0007110711,0.0001502577,0.0010834378,0.0034703552,0.0031887754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99360424,0.0017385207,0.00038541647,0.0004650826,0.0025739484,0.0012328352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003262775,0.0003211425,0.0006222059,0.0021429555,0.030320253,0.012526085,0.0022456837,0.0057184463,0.0070099565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010949389,0.0005521996,0.00065696205,0.003783043,0.027634108,0.0065931445,0.0055842875,0.0086257765,0.00027935047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001022786,0.000006948451,0.00096796564,0.000020887668,0.000005712953,0.00023211799,0.0044658063,0.00025120782,0.000091891816,0.983915,0.0043501398,0.0056822207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007638326,0.000039838396,0.019793028,0.00044906163,0.00007374119,0.00037733006,0.014314393,0.00363695,0.00075125357,0.37704602,0.583223,0.00021894243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99319917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99428916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2000112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2000112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19582418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9278736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125018436","doi":"","title":"What Right Does Unjust Enrichment Law Protect","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Law; Restitution; Economic Justice; Agency (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013548552321564131,"score_gpt":0.2839669928309641,"score_spread":0.27041844050939995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125018436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072425485,0.003901784,0.051208027,0.10604335,0.0007232782,0.00012668935,0.00015132797,0.00020950806,0.76521057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94847274,0.0013287874,0.0054191905,0.018972486,0.0006302522,0.00011368153,0.00007076239,0.00008679917,0.024905322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097145,0.002173614,0.00042056813,0.0015543633,0.0028333701,0.0020466314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904669,0.0047185896,0.0011203454,0.0018069436,0.0014351497,0.00045197422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008962791,0.00042028585,0.0007528045,0.001428375,0.004451574,0.0070618056,0.0016320025,0.007938415,0.007184728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018352948,0.0004619503,0.0007138011,0.0006629937,0.030530816,0.013747162,0.004713743,0.005568993,0.001406367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064273286,0.000014772856,0.00027269113,0.00001952399,0.000006088018,0.000056052646,0.0003679886,0.00017583978,0.00011789045,0.9950112,0.0012328837,0.0027185595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011209253,0.000011750815,0.00030711186,0.000096447,0.000010382735,0.00008172325,0.00042585938,0.00032160868,0.00036913043,0.9749145,0.023439467,0.000010737888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040915287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032909987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008962791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028670141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004747387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047400355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125060229","doi":"10.1017/s1352325214000056","title":"PROPERTY AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Property law; Framing (construction); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Due process; Municipal law; Property rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.013893984298456936,"score_gpt":0.27545334109655345,"score_spread":0.2615593567980965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125060229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030903244,0.01891907,0.22203115,0.08510503,0.0014702926,0.00019445833,0.00029386775,0.00020745475,0.6408754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8970836,0.007083451,0.050787456,0.010994526,0.0018407704,0.0003278539,0.00017996582,0.00010737983,0.031595003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898677,0.0040354137,0.0005300449,0.0021384219,0.002507694,0.0009207457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98959714,0.006631929,0.000855203,0.0014709362,0.0010916812,0.00035316794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009653763,0.00042897346,0.0010028095,0.0023863497,0.0045154886,0.009466499,0.0017518088,0.005437235,0.005567815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013945071,0.00040525204,0.0013314304,0.0017086187,0.046660665,0.011346004,0.0042831353,0.007155552,0.00095002004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.9204943e-7,0.0000019638214,0.000023710756,0.0000050348535,0.0000014458288,0.000008024631,0.000074999254,0.00008314535,0.000008805687,0.9988574,0.00022755,0.00070725265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003746787,0.0000037204131,0.00004100567,0.000016558422,0.0000018210226,0.000011856624,0.000035477267,0.00016469309,0.000018254173,0.99067664,0.009022708,0.0000034041889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008297646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034625297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009653763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005977873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006087698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051054597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125158058","doi":"","title":"The Jewel in the Crown: Can India's Strict Liability Doctrine Deepen Our Understanding of Tort Law Theory?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Doctrine; Delict; Political science; Comparative law; Common law; Law and economics; Economics; Private law; Liability; Black letter law","score_opus":0.03562972347343557,"score_gpt":0.338262468612022,"score_spread":0.30263274513858646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125158058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2784016,0.017047677,0.010309584,0.17438771,0.00060633646,0.000020214182,0.000108790715,0.0000652304,0.5190529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777044,0.0018389721,0.0007720923,0.004320934,0.00017616064,0.000007634182,0.000013528381,0.00000975908,0.005090423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985409,0.0006320319,0.000043532495,0.00015187495,0.0003336484,0.00029800145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969139,0.0020905258,0.00025354666,0.00030049114,0.00025102092,0.00019053441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002520478,0.00018812306,0.00034110752,0.0011866795,0.0045089982,0.00622957,0.0011728331,0.0027927866,0.0018204508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004448954,0.00017774869,0.00035074007,0.0013831372,0.03174131,0.004753936,0.0038682902,0.005469145,0.0003007686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003833057,0.0000046324817,0.00039254015,0.000008828579,0.0000015564415,0.000061832376,0.0028801218,0.00013390381,0.000031529522,0.9929597,0.0008260466,0.00269559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000838108,0.000028597446,0.0038809585,0.00012622814,0.0000134689335,0.00021752149,0.0065128068,0.00093043933,0.00017207154,0.93988216,0.04820315,0.000024362726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02381123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029150696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02381123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005867424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005639162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04734522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125188947","doi":"","title":"Two Models of General Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Variety (cybernetics); Scholarship; Contrast (vision); Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01610711371855004,"score_gpt":0.30806680983406975,"score_spread":0.2919596961155197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125188947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041425485,0.0063832146,0.23892353,0.11533142,0.0009603509,0.00022026699,0.0002848874,0.00029234032,0.5961784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196824,0.0019510526,0.033246387,0.01065544,0.0006109126,0.0004082379,0.00024029045,0.00013247025,0.03307282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889024,0.0054668486,0.0004317564,0.0015736801,0.0026538942,0.00097148994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907673,0.00587641,0.00065083493,0.002155265,0.0015082529,0.00073248614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01105717,0.00060368667,0.00090097234,0.0024756594,0.003396236,0.008578876,0.0030482307,0.0069207908,0.005901444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017881602,0.0006624761,0.0014080564,0.0022550044,0.03280954,0.013823952,0.005848261,0.0069746827,0.0009738684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019755648,0.0000030791052,0.000035811623,0.000005172085,0.0000010768777,0.0000073815168,0.0004841086,0.00008763867,0.000006381454,0.9983333,0.0004885427,0.0005455912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074646828,0.0000046734044,0.00009220858,0.000017286397,0.000002022765,0.000034668097,0.00019584216,0.0006329092,0.00001939285,0.9895766,0.009412476,0.0000043535338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049126917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004052038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01105717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008449828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003676786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061308026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125227557","doi":"","title":"The Patriation of Canadian Corporate Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Political science; Statute; Appeal; Corporate law; Legislation; English law; Comparative law; Lawmaking; Statutory law; Legislature; Corporate governance; Business","score_opus":0.032269273149962245,"score_gpt":0.2369507830417258,"score_spread":0.20468150989176354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125227557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092734054,0.030017572,0.0030803797,0.040648732,0.00083162513,0.00005063878,0.0017621126,0.00014247824,0.83073235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9011526,0.020834217,0.0023374462,0.004372029,0.0003583889,0.000023565159,0.00061272836,0.00010143492,0.0702077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930589,0.000482868,0.00012853487,0.000799398,0.0043174764,0.00121277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99238765,0.0012650461,0.0005566609,0.00034890385,0.004914326,0.00052746653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018950583,0.00030384352,0.00031257112,0.010685226,0.013301572,0.011758856,0.001263442,0.0020849174,0.004142359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010040115,0.0002798532,0.00035141985,0.017618274,0.011467181,0.002495708,0.0017439199,0.0021883734,0.0003833294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012505924,0.000004346633,0.0058101104,0.00016250953,0.000016450913,0.00037863685,0.018324977,0.00032460754,0.00029547795,0.8784484,0.04064258,0.05557936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001822967,0.0000049540245,0.016449122,0.0002874296,0.000023341254,0.00020978058,0.0047421744,0.0003278857,0.00024332262,0.012734642,0.9649325,0.000043025037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13959715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10989425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125288761","doi":"","title":"Assumed Jurisdiction in Canada: Identifying and Interpreting Presumptive Connecting Factors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tort; Cause of action; Fiduciary; Statutory law; Law; Duty; Misrepresentation; Common law; Plaintiff; Exclusive jurisdiction; Political science; Action (physics); Business; Liability","score_opus":0.017486984102103365,"score_gpt":0.2993349664142414,"score_spread":0.28184798231213803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125288761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34427628,0.009905429,0.031008396,0.086429395,0.0004074989,0.00040344492,0.0014167808,0.00014720538,0.52600557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834854,0.0016334712,0.005229017,0.0025977558,0.000027716464,0.000048574926,0.00012207928,0.000029722212,0.006826363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97810555,0.0033132122,0.0008840521,0.0020686714,0.009251539,0.0063769324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664108,0.013287571,0.0020056956,0.0013835473,0.0145501215,0.002362328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136416545,0.00047799596,0.0007570959,0.0056179846,0.028715821,0.0159932,0.0046666972,0.0039810217,0.0044871704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052814595,0.0007891798,0.00090218533,0.006546161,0.029438837,0.0059969495,0.008346017,0.007545059,0.00024510387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027040529,0.000013118913,0.014502914,0.00012829536,0.00003804604,0.0008947785,0.038396403,0.0013658708,0.00016681086,0.91983813,0.008606434,0.016022146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006178237,0.00003582386,0.07773405,0.0022749824,0.00030016724,0.0007477143,0.1205008,0.013688662,0.0013756567,0.5789235,0.20398483,0.0003720026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99564916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22292125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22292125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3389052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9013012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125321180","doi":"","title":"Reconciling with the Past: John Willis and the Question of Judicial Review in Interwar and Postwar England","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Elite; Honour; Honor; Sociology","score_opus":0.01813907832416017,"score_gpt":0.26120975325361995,"score_spread":0.24307067492945977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125321180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0540106,0.10024404,0.0010686786,0.72892886,0.003933097,0.00002614768,0.00002691186,0.000025787214,0.11173591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85320234,0.026784329,0.00057053426,0.07917169,0.005765556,0.00004920262,0.0000146310895,0.00004741187,0.03439431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782,0.0070930626,0.00038021573,0.00085141626,0.0022728394,0.0015824476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770922,0.017153768,0.0015621966,0.0007086042,0.0021352738,0.0013479813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01563192,0.0002252378,0.00051422376,0.002087877,0.019468514,0.0189039,0.0019493809,0.011472339,0.0017157871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028370775,0.00055674464,0.00022994171,0.0021770038,0.040423274,0.012133491,0.0043229572,0.009626576,0.00027316716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026304813,0.000021079704,0.00056281715,0.000057457462,0.000005539203,0.00043411576,0.058778115,0.00010592009,0.00006562212,0.8883018,0.043047752,0.008593399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027866445,0.000031389343,0.0024703387,0.0004946016,0.000010128638,0.0003338599,0.030183889,0.00019002928,0.00022192512,0.16601549,0.7999469,0.00007359313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07828828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12888819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07828828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022111908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015244319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16043389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125508104","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 2014-2015 Term","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Tribunal; Presumption; Discretion; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Judicial review; Legislature; Legislative history; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Legislative intent; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.025440308500671294,"score_gpt":0.34733128414553627,"score_spread":0.32189097564486496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125508104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019851811,0.023535552,0.006703174,0.0724398,0.008177675,0.00020222132,0.0005265084,0.00013862092,0.8684246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55622005,0.010416389,0.009592905,0.1312538,0.006401369,0.0011140775,0.0006615917,0.00013423481,0.2842056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97996545,0.0024913314,0.0016765102,0.0028494396,0.010146284,0.002870999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941216,0.0018191542,0.00056246895,0.0004125776,0.0023872661,0.0006970216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012463286,0.00054594513,0.00048181755,0.002239262,0.010561355,0.015727807,0.002340922,0.013517663,0.0027771285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015115294,0.0008042633,0.0011591939,0.001559541,0.02114166,0.006552143,0.0072101704,0.01492092,0.0009063174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000746642,0.000018376984,0.0003560763,0.000026744605,0.0000034312154,0.000061100254,0.0012770544,0.000096985335,0.00014597205,0.9703087,0.02296758,0.0047304174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016412128,0.0000724593,0.004883557,0.00046739512,0.000018110488,0.000272455,0.0012622979,0.00027715205,0.0004264794,0.06255687,0.92966336,0.0000834649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3092137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2745183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3092137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04572082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041290134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61482775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125564929","doi":"","title":"A Rational Approach to Cabinet Immunity Under the Common Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Impartiality; Law; Political science; Public interest; Judicial review; Standard of review; Law and economics; Doctrine; Discretion; Common law; Cabinet (room); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.033681656850413855,"score_gpt":0.3315073318909187,"score_spread":0.29782567504050483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125564929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021490255,0.0025500895,0.41800305,0.08030795,0.0009980096,0.0005796664,0.00019808835,0.0002809643,0.47559196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8093296,0.0015371364,0.13300693,0.014500733,0.0016593549,0.0009729006,0.00010344928,0.00013369991,0.03875619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751951,0.008104223,0.0011171845,0.004424764,0.009211729,0.0019469629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99137163,0.003922424,0.000660931,0.0016188032,0.0019902678,0.0004358953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020732734,0.00094160216,0.0012814618,0.0030063605,0.0057720887,0.014598978,0.0041931327,0.0146410605,0.0043546828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018811017,0.0009330688,0.0018934086,0.001259957,0.04762365,0.0113408975,0.0041875197,0.013547995,0.0011993758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015607591,0.000003755535,0.000013344146,0.0000029667308,0.0000014730329,0.000010215703,0.000090276415,0.00013922488,0.00002188013,0.9991881,0.00019198068,0.00033511705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015392432,0.000011203275,0.0000293648,0.000024572535,0.0000054339107,0.00001583366,0.00004431471,0.0011579886,0.000101683785,0.99149245,0.007088718,0.000012928962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010925934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010837842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020732734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01558397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017390577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11307013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125627900","doi":"","title":"The Lawyer as Fiduciary: Defining Private Law Duties in Public Law Relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Law; Obligation; Discretion; Trust law; Normative; Political science; Private law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.04887154238550128,"score_gpt":0.27458242721129483,"score_spread":0.22571088482579355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125627900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2609033,0.009213942,0.11847296,0.06507044,0.00043829728,0.00018013426,0.000058793517,0.0000846081,0.5455776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98804504,0.0007286008,0.0046721213,0.001604331,0.00019471228,0.00006138491,0.0000122417905,0.000033349108,0.0046481756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991235,0.004654201,0.00038286534,0.0006464877,0.0018048526,0.0012766274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886761,0.0064923316,0.0014332463,0.0014426714,0.0009018,0.0010539485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007335101,0.0003069847,0.0005536199,0.0028994074,0.009221717,0.01975713,0.0014799527,0.008764378,0.0032725546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014090251,0.00059395353,0.00054067647,0.002525015,0.06462469,0.028050201,0.008191078,0.0072450694,0.0005900799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037161783,0.000019201507,0.0004482464,0.000011810023,9.072065e-7,0.00004789473,0.009892392,0.000060812017,0.00005087095,0.9863267,0.00030355566,0.0028339045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083160985,0.00001872879,0.0016148454,0.00018465007,0.000004156466,0.000203625,0.011326923,0.0009579716,0.00015780002,0.958538,0.02696618,0.000018763527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074348194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006539541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01975713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010888099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00815228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07899904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125644741","doi":"","title":"Choice-of-Law Rules for Secured Transactions: An Interest-Based and Modern Principles-Based Framework for Assessment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Security interest; Law; Municipal law; Uniform Commercial Code; Comparative law; Normative; Doctrine; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Law reform; Public law; Choice of law; Sociology; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.10926816103630789,"score_gpt":0.4000314781151167,"score_spread":0.2907633170788088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125644741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009159089,0.006619098,0.5610931,0.04088107,0.0010010633,0.0005269868,0.00030363354,0.00014333805,0.38027266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64982325,0.007977464,0.28442317,0.008177657,0.0022882174,0.0017700118,0.0004496047,0.00030662277,0.044783942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760223,0.010560247,0.0020398367,0.0026080054,0.0074075065,0.0013620645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97990006,0.013104116,0.0016176747,0.0024520215,0.0022746564,0.0006515086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028013552,0.0013197183,0.001573907,0.0051257154,0.004547888,0.021498796,0.006003186,0.011053521,0.005891164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033084545,0.001060263,0.0018921132,0.0033775754,0.051629845,0.028474683,0.0074282386,0.01276231,0.0017421584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.847264e-7,0.0000031429727,0.00003589663,0.000008593364,0.0000011418114,0.000015175851,0.00020556191,0.00025452522,0.000010132451,0.99813074,0.00040940387,0.00092473015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034026446,0.0000053184885,0.000053862772,0.00008566661,0.0000022348952,0.000026472884,0.00018253265,0.0009874485,0.00003917692,0.9814967,0.017108016,0.000009273114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00844611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006373365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028013552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010147985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010943344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14815164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125749829","doi":"10.5235/096157612800081222","title":"Libertarian Paternalism and the Dangers of Nudging Consumers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"King s Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Libertarianism; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021568263122398686,"score_gpt":0.2970277557268479,"score_spread":0.27545949260444924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125749829","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044962965,0.01760849,0.008463754,0.571769,0.0010267395,0.000053683216,0.00011674111,0.000043380813,0.35595533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84812856,0.0053665307,0.0018777462,0.10060902,0.00081071,0.0001123144,0.000036629328,0.000048142465,0.043010306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99353504,0.0030079118,0.0002488882,0.00060242694,0.001407201,0.0011986764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902699,0.0065618176,0.0009308416,0.0005900738,0.0012085384,0.00043876687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119885225,0.00040348768,0.00048696785,0.0005921563,0.010475861,0.006032018,0.0015423937,0.020343984,0.0047581997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017583242,0.000549744,0.0006280066,0.00074446306,0.025837693,0.0072405543,0.0055416627,0.01821379,0.0010900544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034340537,0.00002083614,0.00070196006,0.0000243509,0.000007237424,0.00019258382,0.0063438313,0.000070543836,0.00007230701,0.96368873,0.024136715,0.004706669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011556143,0.00005376869,0.0028381126,0.00042070218,0.0000381304,0.00051092095,0.005641952,0.0003720907,0.00063099846,0.84590685,0.14341575,0.00005512615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012461331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025699472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020343984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003939411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064400397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06340212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125752786","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.229","title":"Corrective Justice and Unjust Enrichment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Private law; Economic Justice; Tort; Law; Duty; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Restitution; Liability","score_opus":0.01763466405302733,"score_gpt":0.27011748703015,"score_spread":0.25248282297712266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125752786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05740916,0.004201189,0.07361736,0.042687222,0.00053921324,0.00008749143,0.00007068002,0.00013572279,0.8212519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599305,0.000642343,0.0044613155,0.004487775,0.00027794947,0.00006052057,0.000023974351,0.00004953754,0.03006599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952887,0.0015487542,0.00016518752,0.0007027969,0.0013867383,0.00090776663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977028,0.0009336236,0.00028659872,0.0005477734,0.00032020826,0.00020907489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031333936,0.0003767921,0.00049692206,0.0010213066,0.004298414,0.0037240095,0.0007846084,0.004194198,0.0055200746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006282878,0.000258952,0.00050888746,0.0006445794,0.03042776,0.0068304734,0.00523305,0.0046779113,0.00045958662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002295729,0.0000038747876,0.00006328254,0.000006463238,0.0000010927987,0.000021799871,0.00036947947,0.00008576166,0.000041650983,0.9975387,0.00044621914,0.0014194453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049276455,0.0000061596684,0.0002063624,0.000025197789,0.000002704322,0.0000496631,0.00018144572,0.00019955146,0.00013448391,0.980352,0.018832905,0.0000044894023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004862274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048245676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055200746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051535764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046392204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03739202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125754435","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.481","title":"AN OBJECT LESSON IN SPECULATION: MULTIPLE VIEWS OF THE CATHEDRAL IN <i>LEAF V. INTERNATIONAL GALLERIES</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Painting; Law; Doctrine; Appeal; Damages; Speculation; Rescission; Verisimilitude; Art; Art history; Political science; Literature; Economics","score_opus":0.03133497533826046,"score_gpt":0.2749085395805675,"score_spread":0.24357356424230703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125754435","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009045987,0.0038638967,0.0034573013,0.8801661,0.0024553924,0.000019916453,0.0000753738,0.000035796187,0.1008803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43394634,0.0029445798,0.0024031668,0.51484513,0.012232619,0.00015224676,0.00007031884,0.00014615912,0.033259455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078476,0.0051329345,0.00027976508,0.0015173525,0.0014160273,0.000869118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98097,0.015652355,0.00073961704,0.0008277549,0.0012228917,0.0005874004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154857235,0.00069374556,0.0008015709,0.0013946327,0.012402285,0.013874441,0.0047925417,0.030711785,0.008884026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032621525,0.00072886713,0.0012567719,0.0013201092,0.03911315,0.026377877,0.0071469904,0.03718571,0.00115202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027579352,0.0000113173555,0.00031126768,0.00003228039,0.000008559946,0.00041536786,0.012112723,0.000079019526,0.00007468493,0.93035877,0.053924218,0.002644151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065385415,0.000031331063,0.0004198287,0.00047772686,0.000026051666,0.0003301267,0.016944563,0.0005662887,0.00030385723,0.72157013,0.259201,0.000063758234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014763494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01506045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030711785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006141767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004901146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08189726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125768953","doi":"10.29173/alr237","title":"Which &lt;i&gt;Kraft&lt;/i&gt; of Statutory Interpretation? A Supreme Court of Canada Trilogy on Intellectual Property Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statute; Law; Statutory law; Supreme court; Trilogy; Legislative intent; Legislature; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislation; Judicial interpretation; Discretion; Intellectual property; Normative; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.025360761903392214,"score_gpt":0.2784343435409271,"score_spread":0.2530735816375349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125768953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015060269,0.0408377,0.00792164,0.51097745,0.001934068,0.00007636388,0.00025385243,0.00006804262,0.42287067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83725154,0.024058128,0.008351979,0.06626423,0.0019027705,0.00012531829,0.00013227477,0.00012415346,0.061789624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884065,0.0036926633,0.00034582056,0.0011657196,0.004160876,0.0022285117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98977154,0.0051958407,0.00058529124,0.0005315438,0.0032602735,0.00065537257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012415474,0.0003713725,0.00073531107,0.0032417993,0.010485241,0.019882234,0.0025680072,0.0081946505,0.0041413717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018475607,0.0005508103,0.00059322256,0.0040945006,0.053821545,0.00796635,0.0021861764,0.010100751,0.0005483509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030420586,0.0000034514985,0.0002126926,0.000018589677,0.00000272344,0.000028227929,0.00077722187,0.000058673046,0.000019633657,0.9816428,0.012094221,0.005138882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002653972,0.0000095423975,0.0024194713,0.0007873064,0.000038763425,0.00006536062,0.0037423435,0.0011716783,0.00026537836,0.79232377,0.19909021,0.000059676397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.831797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88478184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.168203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07800043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093231924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5659354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125806982","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1000","title":"Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Tort; Political science; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029359555964043813,"score_gpt":0.3850370660161229,"score_spread":0.3556775100520791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125806982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010511727,0.010359965,0.26314038,0.024185194,0.0014540872,0.00021004463,0.00009146264,0.00026734264,0.68977976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8460099,0.005176599,0.04997512,0.008546245,0.0019728339,0.00043875506,0.000063611806,0.00021566683,0.08760115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988059,0.0030961996,0.0005053453,0.0017518955,0.005434487,0.0011530578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438184,0.002197701,0.0006197748,0.0015925698,0.00091269996,0.0002954677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074906033,0.0011719698,0.0010035058,0.002148716,0.00413768,0.008768057,0.0029722843,0.009140892,0.00639788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009743711,0.00058064016,0.0012123724,0.0011989065,0.039302498,0.0122690685,0.007085558,0.009214379,0.0009778744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016045702,0.000004021697,0.000017440043,0.000007803158,0.0000015865829,0.000016420538,0.00009144362,0.00022295362,0.000037243903,0.9977582,0.0003661654,0.0014750923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053201857,0.0000128505435,0.00008442865,0.00004894727,0.00000641075,0.0000753296,0.00007119484,0.00050246035,0.00014271494,0.97859794,0.020438455,0.000013897746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024947408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032395488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009140892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00605617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046063485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043940842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125813465","doi":"","title":"Understanding Fiduciary Duties and Relationship Fiduciarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Law; Foundation (evidence); Scholarship; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Duty","score_opus":0.15787420990941067,"score_gpt":0.3585188649309531,"score_spread":0.2006446550215424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125813465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105717555,0.028150769,0.065923154,0.12976182,0.0009835649,0.000055842916,0.000068672045,0.00006398723,0.6692746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674704,0.006436885,0.0066306894,0.0057832743,0.00056426413,0.000062938576,0.000038796716,0.00003557875,0.0129771475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921186,0.0044448124,0.00029350034,0.00081744895,0.0013879631,0.0009375598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882046,0.0079237735,0.0011971256,0.0008359277,0.0010559692,0.0007826385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010705523,0.000409138,0.00050069205,0.0027688069,0.0072043124,0.0121424105,0.0013706844,0.0056094085,0.0034894447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018806152,0.00037750026,0.0004805805,0.0016421683,0.04853875,0.020342823,0.007000022,0.0064299204,0.0006711646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023595667,0.0000044886547,0.0002577959,0.000011378806,6.904857e-7,0.000028199825,0.009211013,0.000077346594,0.000023060915,0.9851677,0.0007033943,0.004512575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043692867,0.000012221045,0.0010246031,0.00027338805,0.000004203497,0.00016064008,0.0088164145,0.00053291314,0.00010893673,0.89811003,0.09093483,0.000017533623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009629131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008467013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121424105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009607002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008039886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069703996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125842437","doi":"10.7202/1025139ar","title":"Property in Licences and the Law of Things","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Property law; Tangible property; Law; Government (linguistics); Bundle of rights; Public property; Numerus clausus; Right to property; Intangible property; Reservation of rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Business; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01975974329420483,"score_gpt":0.274742387572499,"score_spread":0.2549826442782942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125842437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06146354,0.0052808356,0.046549924,0.04787404,0.00035260286,0.00007816845,0.00021473406,0.00010394035,0.8380823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563277,0.0015748548,0.0057516675,0.0035297975,0.00042816563,0.00015508464,0.00008397971,0.000050136536,0.03209856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931791,0.0030849604,0.00033813628,0.00091152516,0.0014503159,0.0010359129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98949534,0.0068951068,0.00075489585,0.0015790425,0.00084935426,0.00042623884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006824301,0.0002999579,0.0006375366,0.0016548865,0.005013711,0.008016941,0.0014511385,0.0061178384,0.00960321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014102518,0.0004700121,0.0009507395,0.0013862012,0.039035127,0.014398615,0.0043888846,0.005257535,0.0010784643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015268022,0.0000025117174,0.000045497836,0.0000047694302,0.0000010141966,0.00001614127,0.00012042162,0.000063003245,0.000011792268,0.99886286,0.00028486634,0.0005856181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067524375,0.0000060534694,0.0001634559,0.000028281203,0.0000027454498,0.000035522953,0.00011745789,0.00023871634,0.000046098834,0.98778266,0.0115664005,0.0000058021265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009538731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049905977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00960321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053233914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003730242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038624108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125877897","doi":"","title":"A common law of tort: Is there a European rift in the common law family?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Tort; Political science; Private law; Public law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Scots law; Civil law (Civil law); Human rights; Sources of law; Liability","score_opus":0.09375273478024733,"score_gpt":0.35382517886815446,"score_spread":0.26007244408790714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125877897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19954708,0.036609188,0.05788833,0.2343816,0.0011597278,0.000053689408,0.000103464175,0.000064081076,0.4701929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97161597,0.0039315955,0.004423903,0.009837184,0.00043881594,0.000032101354,0.000022959093,0.000034119348,0.009663162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890703,0.00525189,0.0004553998,0.001983837,0.0020438256,0.0011947649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886933,0.006361101,0.0013348018,0.0015008075,0.0013111447,0.0007989576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010607792,0.0002661171,0.00081937516,0.0017840024,0.0061661713,0.011587053,0.0014394308,0.005936796,0.0038129033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01701426,0.00027151368,0.0005516073,0.0023522323,0.058874816,0.02127873,0.005023754,0.005316707,0.0004679108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033150388,0.0000039028682,0.00023795065,0.0000073030214,0.0000018736885,0.0000511697,0.0034965258,0.000029405339,0.000021641152,0.99184096,0.00084591197,0.003459993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075130624,0.000028440934,0.0022317586,0.0002620975,0.000007315509,0.00040421542,0.008889047,0.0004272372,0.000101186844,0.89584035,0.09177383,0.000027053075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009735446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067594475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011587053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062406384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005196692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05610007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125891625","doi":"","title":"The Law and Politics of Unjust Enrichment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Politics; Mainstream; Legal realism; Private law; Realism; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019820473967449324,"score_gpt":0.2523517861399893,"score_spread":0.23253131217254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125891625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027945494,0.0037520982,0.0051481384,0.026680117,0.0002353811,0.000014306344,0.000028144828,0.000046961424,0.93614936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94130003,0.00082072866,0.00082407286,0.0041576023,0.00020428577,0.00003189444,0.000019094254,0.000046036927,0.05259618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959848,0.0019077212,0.000075740885,0.0006393616,0.0007103296,0.00068200094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881434,0.0005284677,0.00009954811,0.00028927482,0.0001569528,0.00011142067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029129996,0.00022748845,0.00034934384,0.0010360216,0.007861131,0.009392923,0.0007731038,0.0040440517,0.0067689144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038567577,0.00025106253,0.0003094949,0.00072917313,0.037656162,0.006257884,0.00503298,0.0048908656,0.0007496293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015993137,0.0000018058661,0.00003576769,0.000002045536,4.614896e-7,0.000006479606,0.00042631268,0.00002593724,0.00001356363,0.99825436,0.0006313115,0.00060042803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076288243,0.0000056866647,0.00026357576,0.000048706188,0.0000036162605,0.000028800798,0.0009970253,0.00023998981,0.00012744851,0.9206813,0.077590704,0.000005535609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009717511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010222984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009717511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008246457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003806629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059832454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126032045","doi":"10.21991/c95q3w","title":"Nonpartisanship of Agents of Parliament: Bill C-520’s Redundant and Likely Unconstitutional Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitutionality; Bill of rights; Politics; Law; Political science; Public sector; Impartiality; Ambiguity; Public service; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.03383397789530636,"score_gpt":0.2913964090708161,"score_spread":0.25756243117550975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126032045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035219602,0.0017349605,0.021175196,0.20155689,0.008257886,0.0006949051,0.00032775817,0.00039122332,0.73064154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4088462,0.00076872314,0.017764498,0.24209566,0.0044422364,0.0014856282,0.0003277299,0.00032454412,0.32394478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709166,0.0063801114,0.0017640555,0.0040466874,0.010998725,0.0058938335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831535,0.00702204,0.0009320376,0.0033216747,0.004155983,0.0014148047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01672018,0.0005422705,0.00066926243,0.0011371224,0.00927758,0.012700834,0.0029647534,0.02370386,0.0069361944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036651194,0.00088606746,0.0011883797,0.000735922,0.009320512,0.004571581,0.004251756,0.015975643,0.0034172952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025940173,0.000064031025,0.00044163334,0.00003159402,0.0000076095776,0.00018329134,0.0012527679,0.00015179801,0.0007249769,0.91566145,0.07292907,0.008525791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008468131,0.00011471158,0.0026965914,0.00029215153,0.000035726007,0.00033851346,0.0010005193,0.0010281355,0.0017916977,0.14431779,0.848189,0.000110476656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023742858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02809607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97625715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064732623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015872413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088425815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126056798","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.512","title":"On the Contrary: Inferential Analysis and Ontological Assumptions of the A Contrario Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stateless protocol; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Sentence; State (computer science); Position (finance); Subject (documents); Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.048102974027944195,"score_gpt":0.29248937480366005,"score_spread":0.24438640077571586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126056798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052863922,0.0014798514,0.5283613,0.07866797,0.0007060649,0.00027210743,0.00033029032,0.00017419492,0.3371442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902907,0.000719686,0.08338844,0.008727755,0.0007114059,0.00059398194,0.0001636505,0.000076156684,0.015328248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894656,0.0055074515,0.00060319854,0.0012339801,0.0025996633,0.00059004483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98314327,0.010778718,0.0015777089,0.002242571,0.0018621217,0.00039558634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013137299,0.0005407899,0.0007121633,0.0033226064,0.0032668577,0.005362566,0.0025396757,0.0058277124,0.005432114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020537168,0.0003037514,0.0015041628,0.001824763,0.02184038,0.012255011,0.0039485805,0.005518962,0.00080343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022590516,0.0000037177751,0.00003251634,0.0000054456564,0.0000014475697,0.000016113174,0.00013169557,0.00005340651,0.000025553076,0.99907255,0.00021713115,0.0004381113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072285316,0.000006308554,0.000069986694,0.000017848879,0.0000034475052,0.00003444848,0.000100090256,0.0010622974,0.00013882751,0.99520904,0.0033458853,0.0000046456908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020551865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001455347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013137299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028429409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022944699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0694775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126085403","doi":"","title":"The Trials and Tribulations of Ontario's Mining Act: The Duty to Consult and Anishinaabek Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Statutory law; Treaty; Political science; Statutory interpretation","score_opus":0.06101447789159724,"score_gpt":0.3493304062936099,"score_spread":0.28831592840201264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126085403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11738294,0.0045270086,0.0033152618,0.09623151,0.00082203426,0.00026986632,0.00042844898,0.00008055724,0.7769424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7798102,0.0018920313,0.0029363967,0.015324237,0.00018518977,0.00015785289,0.00012637519,0.000048185637,0.19951952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99108714,0.0008379057,0.0003303796,0.00060692534,0.004892943,0.0022448336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948053,0.0017042157,0.00041601056,0.0004533491,0.0020631002,0.0005580609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037885103,0.00020096738,0.0003877993,0.0008402723,0.016452372,0.0073514646,0.0017761033,0.0050499495,0.0037425763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009974954,0.00048549005,0.00036259854,0.0014578098,0.017458633,0.0020725895,0.0026540428,0.004801784,0.00045591092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006121366,0.000021945165,0.0034593376,0.00008575352,0.000011534441,0.0005340434,0.014064515,0.00039051744,0.00068060047,0.9268879,0.039959136,0.013843488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008865413,0.000045600565,0.019104348,0.00038120218,0.000057574794,0.00017276945,0.008824495,0.0011191153,0.00085589057,0.06439373,0.90481365,0.00014290753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9700299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98692316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082971655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.082971655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15427986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6020043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126946898","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3578","title":"Error of Law: An Exception to the Discoverability Principle?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Supreme court; Doctrine; Computer science","score_opus":0.059745247600011896,"score_gpt":0.3816571129524459,"score_spread":0.32191186535243405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126946898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10039235,0.0042405888,0.24743591,0.2469532,0.0015816574,0.0002725623,0.0002993982,0.000308096,0.39851624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183409,0.0015475919,0.031051725,0.02337043,0.0008682598,0.00018518981,0.000082786784,0.000109403685,0.024443692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97714645,0.003992591,0.0014884378,0.0041751494,0.010567874,0.0026294973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959653,0.025053052,0.0033327048,0.0065835156,0.0044771023,0.00090059737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02268789,0.00048539703,0.0012272379,0.0015428916,0.0045602373,0.007867862,0.0050161853,0.013189726,0.0022909958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052623566,0.00066166907,0.0013142256,0.0011458888,0.04671385,0.014027876,0.006360246,0.013222735,0.00053652894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005769798,0.000007002107,0.00048833527,0.000013986309,0.0000045159186,0.00011997291,0.001059585,0.00018255098,0.000080455255,0.99326646,0.0011385335,0.0036328929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001683669,0.00002412032,0.00070729904,0.000103487684,0.000012856308,0.00030221694,0.0007333056,0.0010890164,0.00036952,0.97064847,0.025956117,0.000036789057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061963137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0511302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061963137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006745514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019795684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12320495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127244732","doi":"","title":"Decomposing Bhasin V. Hrynew: Toward an Institutional Understanding of the General Organizing Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Fair dealing; Faith; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Good faith; Legislature; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05199432592871547,"score_gpt":0.3393791762831223,"score_spread":0.28738485035440686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127244732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10147378,0.0058245277,0.094906844,0.0543786,0.0003291866,0.00030388302,0.00018165908,0.00009457238,0.742507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654164,0.0021221004,0.011188028,0.0029042421,0.000074948286,0.000083126666,0.000083649786,0.000038884664,0.018088605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941307,0.0014155804,0.00013881204,0.00080298004,0.0020815802,0.0014303586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967499,0.0011202458,0.00039014095,0.00045189902,0.00084890734,0.00043906368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005123153,0.00044858834,0.00048612867,0.0025359096,0.0076423907,0.011682583,0.0021996628,0.0032243978,0.0026817534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008014981,0.0005517598,0.00047193648,0.002504397,0.045063093,0.009461376,0.006522137,0.006231684,0.00031599737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024918838,0.0000024097226,0.00017792362,0.0000063989883,9.690399e-7,0.00003281744,0.0021812043,0.00013826873,0.00003912603,0.9943873,0.00046915805,0.0025617897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013417761,0.000018636658,0.0019907875,0.00015523967,0.000011258122,0.000086158434,0.0048919055,0.0016943064,0.00039665058,0.9299041,0.060781002,0.00005659625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5293307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57260364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5293307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04280969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056808922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94688237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128147327","doi":"10.17613/7w0g-4928","title":"The Role of the Digression on the Man of the Law Courts and the Philosopher (172b-177c) in the Argument of Theaetetus","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanities Commons CORE (Modern Language Association / Columbia University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Digression; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.017046056398819853,"score_gpt":0.21929048749327099,"score_spread":0.20224443109445114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128147327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023885641,0.008649238,0.019190857,0.17155536,0.0045804083,0.000070735354,0.00014528133,0.00007039423,0.7718521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.819931,0.0030646613,0.0072075035,0.049235158,0.002860773,0.00023189416,0.000073318064,0.00017521475,0.11722047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997086,0.0013310995,0.00008208424,0.00027356402,0.00085591024,0.0003712427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846965,0.00086065446,0.00013239913,0.00011392835,0.00027716704,0.00014612683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034995638,0.000620569,0.00046420083,0.0021357138,0.0069751153,0.0067345896,0.0010195004,0.0057377527,0.0054176757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006069788,0.00031712005,0.00047306519,0.0012428114,0.038781878,0.0067409975,0.0040089395,0.0096721435,0.0010044675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037995856,0.0000027953322,0.000030023779,0.00000705053,6.23277e-7,0.00001221312,0.0012552434,0.0000120743325,0.00001836192,0.99578226,0.0021849805,0.00069044484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026653408,0.00002402844,0.0004831844,0.0001741463,0.000005541266,0.00008771294,0.0024575694,0.00027901834,0.00027209794,0.772271,0.22390173,0.000017388718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009651517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011828828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009651517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006999353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054057385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05078411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130161451","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Newfoundland & Labrador","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.032429410616331554,"score_gpt":0.2908973925404317,"score_spread":0.25846798192410014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130161451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005865457,0.0056269625,0.00060222467,0.008448139,0.0009261019,0.00026600313,0.019151041,0.0008407493,0.9635523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009216765,0.0017010956,0.0003880995,0.0006092566,0.000042533615,0.000051181985,0.0022442185,0.00017963731,0.9938623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769825,0.0001298249,0.00012427784,0.0002050242,0.0013767648,0.0004658768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218905,0.00069460657,0.00016394006,0.00036732442,0.0058837547,0.0007013816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023383452,0.0019416986,0.0013383069,0.0075273267,0.01098429,0.012528969,0.0028186159,0.0058766236,0.40589678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077228,0.0018410541,0.0007411209,0.016075466,0.0028554546,0.005239863,0.0025072943,0.0040169707,0.14051257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059559425,0.0000098390665,0.00007307985,0.0000542622,8.4101066e-7,0.00001134782,0.00007474434,0.00005340403,0.000020632726,0.006259676,0.97700953,0.01642662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031459892,0.0000021782278,0.00090968824,0.00013953149,0.0000025099528,0.000009404351,0.00019372029,0.00006582181,0.000044091244,0.0007310732,0.99788696,0.000011958875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97149855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99220204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40589678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05750369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1333447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84741616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130340362","doi":"","title":"Revisiting Auditors Liability for their reports in light of Jetiva and Livent","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Liability; Tort; Accounting; Statutory law; Business; Shareholder; Materiality (auditing); Duty; Law; Meaning (existential); Pleading; Auditor's report; Legal liability; Political science; Finance; Psychology; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.012159173167506986,"score_gpt":0.24221244390904545,"score_spread":0.23005327074153847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130340362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06421949,0.0142678665,0.022040935,0.55590844,0.016263915,0.0007720533,0.00048716227,0.00150671,0.32453343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62832826,0.0081482325,0.012686207,0.22242373,0.013861345,0.00042578857,0.0003263828,0.0006297388,0.113170266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88048935,0.030783294,0.015954437,0.009750417,0.05215842,0.010864164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62486714,0.20233259,0.03304018,0.03752281,0.09115283,0.011084408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08079182,0.00043226482,0.0005502297,0.004489301,0.0065288,0.019956483,0.006363833,0.018579306,0.005732597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31464517,0.0010854991,0.0011178928,0.0024426652,0.008317567,0.008314375,0.006802562,0.015475209,0.0027696087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094301206,0.000100962425,0.015660875,0.00038430284,0.000060331135,0.0062878504,0.02046613,0.0006356163,0.0014554468,0.30115485,0.5560797,0.097619705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051044855,0.00012634759,0.010499817,0.0032321701,0.00007448886,0.0031735348,0.0056980997,0.0015558169,0.0014481209,0.025342692,0.9486239,0.00017399472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039400928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051532187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08079182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008036361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03018749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4272731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131619608","doi":"10.1558/ijsll.19198","title":"Strategic Indeterminacy in the Law by David Lanius (2019)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Speech Language and the Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.015730744629071435,"score_gpt":0.3255214376980365,"score_spread":0.30979069306896506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131619608","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009866949,0.49798954,0.0025141342,0.40766844,0.009879138,0.000013699778,0.00014151617,0.00004515543,0.08076165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15562531,0.44245076,0.0042642606,0.09882003,0.025783345,0.00014629829,0.00034459226,0.00018274822,0.27238268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892527,0.00045464354,0.00004440226,0.00018373289,0.0002953962,0.000096482974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999064,0.0005567603,0.00007880133,0.000033320724,0.00015963777,0.00010747419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018245365,0.0008435578,0.00050367706,0.001333309,0.0030259874,0.0067808437,0.0007261048,0.0036335345,0.0063193985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033123628,0.0004292549,0.00032994064,0.0014861815,0.006730492,0.0074450104,0.0032237037,0.0068425885,0.0028565628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002215623,0.000012053626,0.00020184467,0.000111580295,0.000006179701,0.00006409033,0.0010923338,0.0002682389,0.000044588873,0.4300131,0.5329999,0.035163943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055034234,0.0000049291552,0.00032431795,0.00052339945,0.0000034359139,0.00007311089,0.00053005567,0.00015834511,0.00004635446,0.19229083,0.80602133,0.00001842728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015624914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03150549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015624914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069788313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003748539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05063516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131688914","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3740065","title":"Disinheritance, Discrimination and the Case for Including Adult Independent Children in Dependants’ Relief Schemes: Lawen Estate v Nova Scotia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Estate; Nova (rocket); Genealogy; Geography; Political science; History; Engineering; Archaeology; Law; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.024370044121062556,"score_gpt":0.30774286291094155,"score_spread":0.28337281878987897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131688914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6074146,0.0031178198,0.0013681699,0.07847952,0.00068850844,0.00017751954,0.00026380102,0.00002433114,0.3084657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233432,0.0005649148,0.00043182282,0.022469603,0.00008494576,0.000105563784,0.000038167243,0.000016540187,0.052945204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947107,0.0007864918,0.00012966742,0.00043541405,0.0005596103,0.0033781168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544805,0.0016003256,0.00045586965,0.00024669734,0.00054067216,0.0017083705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037749864,0.00039215953,0.0007371697,0.00067995046,0.018408094,0.0067672734,0.0030105466,0.013630526,0.006495518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00945255,0.0009317704,0.00053610874,0.0008981404,0.011272849,0.0026971523,0.007378325,0.011889786,0.0006350194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032981305,0.00025846704,0.05906214,0.00020039536,0.00007716784,0.011508029,0.10006464,0.0005902892,0.0021776943,0.7139732,0.08662803,0.025130115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005007238,0.00040851478,0.18787283,0.0023598217,0.0003701323,0.0076154303,0.19510259,0.0016857988,0.0031182044,0.08053186,0.51994747,0.00048668127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7749821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9352232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2250179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015923567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037944656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45268613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134361335","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3615","title":"A Right Without a Rights-Holder Is Hollow: Introduction to OHLJ’s Special Issue on Identifying Rights-Bearing Aboriginal Peoples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Positivism; Context (archaeology); Section (typography); Political science; Human rights; Sociology; Indigenous; Dilemma; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01970307973863611,"score_gpt":0.334144007238395,"score_spread":0.3144409274997589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134361335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068934076,0.11868598,0.0061426917,0.3843766,0.060440138,0.00023764688,0.00040868545,0.00012145601,0.42269334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16855389,0.08312602,0.00876348,0.16583624,0.07953092,0.00041079693,0.00061903265,0.00040837828,0.49275124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974382,0.0007110854,0.00016225815,0.00037343014,0.0008483318,0.000466552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651694,0.002213296,0.00012323013,0.00012709618,0.0008103505,0.00020916601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004453047,0.00053289,0.0005601141,0.0018440788,0.009912472,0.008629194,0.0016656362,0.0090080155,0.0083873635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005753582,0.00064031425,0.0005947828,0.0016561736,0.0084600905,0.008209095,0.003364335,0.010293255,0.0017756907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014181255,0.000046142326,0.0009865994,0.00032624046,0.000005116545,0.0003948114,0.013905508,0.00005641783,0.0002368281,0.35084224,0.60443693,0.028748943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022305828,0.000008775739,0.0016097204,0.0003821866,0.00000423726,0.00009569648,0.0034788484,0.000054292712,0.000060495106,0.011968714,0.9823139,0.000021005657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08876742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16447172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08876742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081123365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007631762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17650145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134682005","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v10i1.736","title":"Disability and Contractual Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Morality; Realm; Economic Justice; Social contract; Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual disability; Subject (documents); Politics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.06441484961363104,"score_gpt":0.3703899828580848,"score_spread":0.30597513324445375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134682005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03603175,0.0026096432,0.013370423,0.057093427,0.0002771823,0.00007334423,0.00009376067,0.000039994626,0.8904105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715963,0.0010043847,0.0013844023,0.0033658962,0.00012283344,0.00008728223,0.000064845946,0.00003146805,0.022342471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908568,0.0044985856,0.0003694614,0.000756347,0.0020149276,0.0015038213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408984,0.0027683622,0.0005154051,0.0004892427,0.0009490986,0.0011880546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00996979,0.00032364932,0.00035270635,0.00089685817,0.00713809,0.010536476,0.0013102951,0.0041977405,0.011371359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01899693,0.00026945988,0.00041320067,0.0007430309,0.025593964,0.00800766,0.005696595,0.0043972833,0.0014617683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039888664,0.0000058965347,0.00016069807,0.000004220409,6.5581935e-7,0.000023760156,0.0021193027,0.00007586779,0.000011291516,0.99498075,0.0013026585,0.0013110148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011483116,0.000015095381,0.00059882953,0.00009527717,0.0000016935594,0.000093166345,0.005209593,0.00058857625,0.000043031327,0.9347929,0.05853404,0.000016357808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0160707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070450506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0160707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010405564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007053008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075498044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134767072","doi":"","title":"Reform in Small Steps: The Case of The Dependent Contractor","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Sight; Independent contractor; Honour; Work (physics); Law and economics; Legislation; Law; Business; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.016121528827170592,"score_gpt":0.28237460413937726,"score_spread":0.26625307531220666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134767072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115557685,0.0023937172,0.03236995,0.06052815,0.00040601456,0.00029199012,0.000068717876,0.00008279841,0.78830093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89477104,0.00070605933,0.0051231007,0.008270316,0.00012679947,0.0002637106,0.000024053074,0.000046625344,0.090668336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940948,0.0029869447,0.000119893084,0.0006502018,0.0010060454,0.001142186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659806,0.0015603366,0.00015750289,0.00052662386,0.0006754528,0.00048200344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006735518,0.00028932246,0.0003306608,0.0007346884,0.013784755,0.0056958552,0.0023119631,0.0070791426,0.0074161794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010246358,0.0003569587,0.000851059,0.0008865188,0.018858429,0.0049945298,0.00548865,0.008363008,0.0009083993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053093318,0.00001281181,0.0001145012,0.0000065325457,0.000001670837,0.000095676274,0.0026857178,0.000094221876,0.000046226858,0.9936718,0.00183923,0.0014262148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001323417,0.000094906885,0.0017789943,0.00021292444,0.000044137232,0.00027883248,0.010701293,0.0036062328,0.0010536625,0.60977566,0.3722473,0.000073731215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09994641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11810294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09994641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012882403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01451513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19872934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135083697","doi":"","title":"Unique Public Duties of Care: Judicial Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Political science; Tort; Government (linguistics); Supreme Court Decisions; Liability","score_opus":0.01344827350989983,"score_gpt":0.26428231188408197,"score_spread":0.2508340383741821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135083697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24501002,0.004668488,0.0066553303,0.14721401,0.00068921794,0.00016717789,0.00015007869,0.00007029399,0.59537536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711873,0.00089857046,0.0012023438,0.010767981,0.00013194559,0.000031478932,0.00003101709,0.000020529142,0.015728837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862839,0.0023385866,0.00022943814,0.001218344,0.0042035934,0.0057261325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939312,0.002755912,0.00036147458,0.0003114142,0.0012433862,0.0013966709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076001487,0.00029726923,0.0005562903,0.0013150532,0.040696044,0.015225103,0.0024346947,0.010465797,0.003033428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012686654,0.0005371517,0.00056397304,0.0025276416,0.036031503,0.003406183,0.00790936,0.016068302,0.00018293175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007825668,0.000018090113,0.0014026791,0.000014686248,0.000011069343,0.0004603267,0.021510815,0.00028275335,0.00014910489,0.9615917,0.008732322,0.0058186115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009937616,0.000044174933,0.019418439,0.0006305767,0.00016002878,0.0006235304,0.05087079,0.0037664894,0.0014726087,0.3763757,0.5462733,0.00026497958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95535856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98207766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12632123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12632123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16478331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91652894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135184885","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0018","title":"The domain of private law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Reciprocal; Law; Normative; Core (optical fiber); Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Institution; Sociology; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.01659580473579248,"score_gpt":0.24110670887428515,"score_spread":0.22451090413849267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135184885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021282272,0.009799303,0.05270815,0.06986672,0.0004226227,0.000073408286,0.00026138747,0.00010564887,0.84548056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413757,0.00532808,0.0073088566,0.0059391833,0.00093510846,0.00012976173,0.00014531806,0.00008358374,0.03875446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941292,0.0028599084,0.00017781009,0.0010485861,0.0011273411,0.0006571803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909396,0.0048766634,0.00047170906,0.0021844662,0.0007884918,0.00073902897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005822416,0.00037355622,0.00074587687,0.0012869543,0.008338561,0.013360421,0.0013423907,0.0064138807,0.00886982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011143478,0.00047357703,0.00058668765,0.0013656834,0.062152807,0.012694534,0.00711546,0.00768995,0.0012710589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010533594,0.0000016097359,0.000034070457,0.000006223798,7.4644237e-7,0.000011354831,0.00035902107,0.00004391085,0.000010575482,0.9981183,0.0006858919,0.00072726666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054588577,0.000003175693,0.00013527636,0.000053767206,0.0000026224357,0.00004298797,0.0005209808,0.0002753583,0.00004512371,0.95329165,0.045619257,0.0000043576047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022641296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010862944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022641296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011548331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011853757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08378935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135278352","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3600192","title":"Gifts and Contracts: A Comparison with Quebec Civil Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.016232374467631133,"score_gpt":0.28123743107951943,"score_spread":0.2650050566118883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135278352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2977177,0.013742796,0.002467369,0.015700316,0.00021431447,0.00009175793,0.0015438235,0.00007295828,0.668449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95668113,0.0022635807,0.0006510774,0.0007634308,0.000029971645,0.000025000367,0.00019586265,0.000018169223,0.039371748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773216,0.00061376847,0.0000478928,0.00013075487,0.000842403,0.0006328536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461854,0.0021689716,0.00044883814,0.00018888873,0.0019860275,0.00058873626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00233123,0.00024180919,0.0004292189,0.0046399604,0.005759804,0.0064129876,0.0010368238,0.0017600157,0.02701938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009885892,0.00015805085,0.00047404066,0.009669855,0.004448272,0.0021446978,0.0012285887,0.0014663131,0.00048739978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019035045,0.00009422787,0.036120445,0.00017225635,0.00004720359,0.0004434401,0.00571515,0.0023121405,0.00017408916,0.87685436,0.023793489,0.054082893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015647868,0.00019056417,0.43966764,0.0010606296,0.00018086267,0.0005189669,0.03146219,0.01047359,0.00055506674,0.07019323,0.44538158,0.00015914337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98618734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0697962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0697962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03677149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5064092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135476353","doi":"10.34961/19004","title":"Protection for owners under the Irish law on adverse possession: an inconsistent use test or a qualified veto system?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Possession (linguistics); Irish; Law; Test (biology); Adverse possession; Business; Political science; History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09536791324339762,"score_gpt":0.27555295384574285,"score_spread":0.18018504060234525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135476353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1455345,0.0017252464,0.035251375,0.11844954,0.0013127855,0.00042842817,0.0002887853,0.00014076983,0.6968686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9193524,0.00069591624,0.009729687,0.03288998,0.00050013093,0.00025086052,0.0001078092,0.00005667698,0.03641651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724096,0.008579891,0.0015339871,0.0031655903,0.00842403,0.005886936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978225,0.009362379,0.0027848342,0.0042981617,0.0040864986,0.0012431836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020993661,0.00040231264,0.000971522,0.0013977587,0.0043392866,0.014524512,0.0044552605,0.011026823,0.0048211734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043594517,0.00073145184,0.0013059288,0.0010294778,0.02778296,0.009553081,0.006231291,0.011020196,0.0010101141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034580327,0.000032921467,0.0036012419,0.000055566394,0.000012242983,0.0002504257,0.0025871622,0.00025380356,0.00034748315,0.9748684,0.0062199556,0.011736217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023624388,0.00067917205,0.020241428,0.0014860271,0.00016898828,0.0011947398,0.016927756,0.0046978067,0.0034658585,0.6632253,0.2872368,0.0004399142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05382963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07328453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05382963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00944975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020168945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111026466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135687096","doi":"","title":"Contract, Power, and the Value of Donative Promises","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Sanctions; Power (physics); Incentive; Variety (cybernetics); Coercion (linguistics); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.0112516883647527,"score_gpt":0.31264110179906995,"score_spread":0.30138941343431724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135687096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08307631,0.0037847431,0.033072013,0.0457448,0.00032626168,0.000093167786,0.00007989281,0.000058348636,0.8337645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788225,0.00073723047,0.0020210114,0.0021198678,0.00016519589,0.000078489255,0.00001605308,0.000037460937,0.016002193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981954,0.009670375,0.0006660216,0.0015964751,0.004178214,0.0019348322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95991546,0.025628347,0.0038023232,0.004477931,0.0039356467,0.0022403286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020366922,0.0004049987,0.00057319197,0.0013511505,0.009422251,0.013004684,0.0018570854,0.0066792243,0.008949417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04113859,0.0005911438,0.000637126,0.0013814212,0.048800793,0.014286083,0.006955435,0.0063908543,0.0007748573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010582117,0.00001001502,0.0003247258,0.000011533541,0.000004406825,0.000047905785,0.0013913786,0.00016963857,0.000034259876,0.994975,0.0007015851,0.0023189643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020858834,0.000021829583,0.00057670916,0.00009501845,0.000011532401,0.000095903524,0.0013584706,0.0007647252,0.00013220924,0.9670118,0.029892543,0.000018450688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059961677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048424373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020366922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00856294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068609635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10771185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136109984","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3635097","title":"Restitution in the Context of Criminal Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Restitution; Criminal justice; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04176280137491262,"score_gpt":0.3629167789248059,"score_spread":0.3211539775498933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136109984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21133478,0.009029558,0.026014118,0.089749075,0.00079846417,0.00015695157,0.00010033248,0.00006464449,0.6627521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98635674,0.0006898278,0.00081899314,0.0019290306,0.00024431097,0.000053269752,0.000011785338,0.000021218404,0.009874809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896651,0.005006339,0.0003179089,0.001087795,0.00074407615,0.0031788056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922351,0.004449699,0.0011699867,0.00060734473,0.00074862794,0.00078923505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063454756,0.00036594673,0.0010380282,0.0013606857,0.012863348,0.009673756,0.0028590288,0.011421343,0.00766388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014517476,0.00032553857,0.00093953154,0.0012584009,0.030845892,0.006428599,0.008208222,0.007790651,0.00065980636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020233101,0.000031532803,0.00070549955,0.000018165501,0.0000067666356,0.00041520759,0.003770317,0.00030938376,0.000053003576,0.9908703,0.0012863182,0.002513251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003081938,0.00008247781,0.0035966919,0.00020853805,0.000031943007,0.00064847164,0.016095605,0.0023060255,0.00021284203,0.9490877,0.027646845,0.000052040035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022866257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03066734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022866257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072007184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007813689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05224508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136603669","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3752386","title":"The Past Present and Future of the Right to Housing in Canada from the Charter To the National Housing Strategy: Where is the Right to Social Housing in Canada Today","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Public housing; Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Housing tenure; Low income housing; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01106696403941525,"score_gpt":0.24723019415925385,"score_spread":0.23616323011983859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136603669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08882798,0.023500139,0.0018548893,0.56013674,0.0018338904,0.0000734842,0.0016126736,0.000071015995,0.32208905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8334172,0.011340039,0.0021117346,0.059527826,0.00045161188,0.000052587824,0.0003232723,0.000078109864,0.09269767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898673,0.00084354426,0.00021527358,0.0007046873,0.002972177,0.0053969715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906437,0.0011788638,0.00036104047,0.0001861017,0.0039418326,0.003688509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004735636,0.00042188342,0.0008842301,0.0015248066,0.030716322,0.023986632,0.0032798154,0.009099149,0.011438444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009009727,0.0006331731,0.00068911194,0.0039798026,0.020274391,0.0064418856,0.0040536663,0.012822867,0.0005200863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059058333,0.00004928545,0.004641917,0.0001436474,0.000021546297,0.00030369547,0.01591577,0.0006512527,0.00023411591,0.88055444,0.07688994,0.020535313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061715735,0.0000343902,0.026042301,0.0013624924,0.000064024076,0.00014131628,0.038969535,0.0018808419,0.0004067746,0.119457245,0.811198,0.00038137502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99839157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24276993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24276993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87827957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136894329","doi":"","title":"What Would the Defendant Have Done But for the Wrong","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Damages; Plaintiff; Duty; Virtue; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020374810590144947,"score_gpt":0.3074067587529545,"score_spread":0.2870319481628095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136894329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11070142,0.0033688191,0.088634446,0.3682685,0.0050244904,0.0007327202,0.00074086006,0.00015977147,0.422369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86476654,0.0015079606,0.033406194,0.038354825,0.0009971418,0.00037451708,0.00020252196,0.00008340419,0.06030694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911054,0.0031940436,0.00048562532,0.002430365,0.0015649695,0.0012195575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435025,0.0027051438,0.0007572358,0.00088199694,0.0009368787,0.00036855167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013120315,0.0005417182,0.0009779852,0.0010849558,0.005387633,0.0042963577,0.0017602294,0.01280561,0.006875008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027743233,0.0004692524,0.001001741,0.0005244151,0.014664494,0.007215873,0.0026607912,0.0055057798,0.0018196868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070430164,0.000032888634,0.0016002813,0.00006922349,0.000042976924,0.00054686103,0.0028456594,0.00030816163,0.00033874126,0.98189217,0.005897758,0.00635488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047266312,0.00008280716,0.0012360172,0.00018359644,0.00007511157,0.0011101624,0.0028346232,0.0017325397,0.0009982932,0.9250556,0.0665809,0.00006310701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005944185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004047276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013120315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025667874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004051037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069387674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137164538","doi":"","title":"Abuse of Court Process: A Study of How Vanuatu Court of Appeal Has Addressed Abuse of Court Process Over Two Decades","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Jurisdiction; Court of record; Political science; Law of the case; Original jurisdiction; Statutory law; High Court","score_opus":0.024554571988600872,"score_gpt":0.3414410441551522,"score_spread":0.3168864721665513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137164538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6741984,0.03564301,0.0044068927,0.038329706,0.0008297551,0.00012585091,0.00007024271,0.00003270617,0.24636349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774684,0.004379842,0.0007597959,0.0067142234,0.00014098542,0.00007401334,0.00003685317,0.000032721946,0.010393179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98793286,0.006145298,0.00042127637,0.0011718298,0.0025894677,0.0017393469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853211,0.010486442,0.0016203334,0.00043999424,0.0014916966,0.0006403597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008821451,0.00020592492,0.00033036305,0.0034591572,0.013838793,0.0120028425,0.0026842912,0.004451861,0.0028111823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028332422,0.00039558613,0.00042204958,0.0049872384,0.011524265,0.009776376,0.0067165573,0.0051476634,0.0002760605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059960163,0.00018257377,0.020191679,0.00032379615,0.000034840825,0.0016765554,0.20620942,0.00053342263,0.00091806747,0.6906404,0.009587563,0.0696416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029767294,0.00021446316,0.068920806,0.0027682185,0.000074799726,0.001956988,0.23682702,0.0018977502,0.0021031236,0.051196054,0.63385046,0.00016059303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08535759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13057685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08535759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025148885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015925078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18246877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137435438","doi":"","title":"Native Title Litigation in Australia: Does the Judiciary Deliver on the Principal Objectives Defined by Mabo?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); High Court; Law; Common law; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.014681122820820347,"score_gpt":0.2871455877466234,"score_spread":0.27246446492580306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137435438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4232932,0.020572538,0.005514335,0.17472298,0.0014757117,0.000075339856,0.00003507517,0.000034102264,0.37427667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954593,0.0039570224,0.0011597518,0.016149879,0.00044198643,0.000032947904,0.000009271552,0.000013674059,0.023642436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99224454,0.0019513385,0.00031031907,0.0008547724,0.0031156202,0.0015234608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918216,0.0031359682,0.0015078516,0.00046040324,0.0019014697,0.0011726882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007772107,0.000111626156,0.00043172945,0.00096984114,0.0076715862,0.00890889,0.0011945763,0.0061380747,0.0015281512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021408798,0.00034156782,0.0003353284,0.0007758711,0.016251383,0.0052853734,0.00566607,0.007885916,0.00028664194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025140107,0.00003477059,0.007156449,0.00011714914,0.000015151068,0.00063620246,0.03783276,0.00022225615,0.0007261469,0.9136115,0.005917097,0.033705484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006885486,0.00042313884,0.11805798,0.0021393762,0.00007680574,0.0015434227,0.045477398,0.0020491118,0.0019483052,0.31503078,0.5129925,0.00019232288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08210318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13339554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08210318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010205952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023848278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16325063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137484143","doi":"10.1017/9781108674355.009","title":"Divergence and Convergence in English and Canadian Administrative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Jurisdiction; Divergence (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Judicial review; Political science; Law; Convergence (economics); Suspect; Comparative law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03902714839844392,"score_gpt":0.2468867709113449,"score_spread":0.20785962251290097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137484143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40822443,0.012271391,0.0022827373,0.027559826,0.00026653695,0.00007923258,0.0008943298,0.00010650639,0.548315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811865,0.002442162,0.0009908549,0.0013939599,0.000039983177,0.00002134829,0.00023007063,0.000043182015,0.013651959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98688996,0.0010707128,0.0003992652,0.0012210339,0.006518621,0.003900291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982615,0.0030530405,0.0010026237,0.00042137,0.011060886,0.0018471327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052127964,0.0002826257,0.00056392845,0.0103360815,0.014956237,0.00979061,0.0021007904,0.0013722942,0.005262397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023567226,0.00034646675,0.00036623064,0.010456566,0.017406287,0.0040752515,0.003713826,0.0033797077,0.00031265398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001163141,0.000039646708,0.025466993,0.00015798709,0.00003536206,0.00070007466,0.24120182,0.0005698522,0.00055726134,0.66625625,0.012535801,0.05236267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003694998,0.000058365724,0.31842884,0.0008116172,0.000069855036,0.00046983288,0.16595252,0.0012372581,0.0006059126,0.03677037,0.47530633,0.00025222017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99175346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.185506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.185506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1138772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9446976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137563335","doi":"","title":"A Critical Analysis of the Case of Prorogations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Prerogative; Justiciability; Judicial review; Political science; Common law; Doctrine; Political question; Politics","score_opus":0.015448265656292329,"score_gpt":0.3478864605632822,"score_spread":0.3324381949069899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137563335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058273934,0.010277614,0.011771004,0.23002405,0.0028282634,0.000274336,0.000103259794,0.00006590902,0.68638164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8537864,0.0028485325,0.0032446026,0.06236205,0.002041147,0.00031630733,0.000034278655,0.00006896444,0.075297676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024105,0.0044302726,0.00027553845,0.0011772715,0.0021596954,0.0017162458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98942894,0.007993158,0.0006303703,0.0003986413,0.0012568119,0.00029208086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00983109,0.00036019596,0.00036111588,0.002149659,0.011088399,0.008748944,0.0015315476,0.009245277,0.0047287415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022301013,0.00046738976,0.0006304934,0.0010697346,0.028509978,0.008770615,0.0036435763,0.010671362,0.0006117529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009661581,0.0000039682673,0.000050458126,0.000021041882,0.0000019880515,0.00028382658,0.005254852,0.000057913403,0.00011904269,0.98380154,0.008602155,0.0017934578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027302338,0.000056991048,0.000574138,0.0003907977,0.000018993076,0.00031229501,0.00930683,0.00045815852,0.0015957474,0.42669618,0.5604867,0.00007583455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019666625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022799496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019666625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016543096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008872433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12002915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138859816","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3687056","title":"Regulating Financial Misconduct: ‘Should the Existing Law Be Administered or Enforced Differently?’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Business; Law; Political science; Accounting","score_opus":0.1583568748610334,"score_gpt":0.3664788220547393,"score_spread":0.20812194719370591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138859816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020236671,0.0068153935,0.022632819,0.79938203,0.007556164,0.00020303935,0.0002963483,0.00034332412,0.14253424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37155953,0.0045899814,0.025748307,0.5684579,0.0066685565,0.0004847958,0.00022922464,0.00027230318,0.021989476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.907576,0.02623702,0.008861166,0.013629064,0.03340661,0.010290059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8155992,0.100411884,0.017192712,0.020196842,0.040978692,0.0056207413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.109582946,0.0005602519,0.0018673782,0.004233762,0.0069224066,0.019658457,0.009320156,0.048474748,0.0069977925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21379901,0.0012982207,0.0018044226,0.003000696,0.041764233,0.01833981,0.0055007143,0.032844413,0.0031100698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044844706,0.00022124888,0.003181446,0.0002785838,0.00010868768,0.00024202,0.0044729323,0.0003013591,0.0014697565,0.8525506,0.102775924,0.034352567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000285572,0.00017851713,0.012760312,0.003528643,0.00032456656,0.00051206804,0.0033168234,0.0016827544,0.0033779012,0.6686234,0.30490717,0.0005023518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030256897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037589915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109582946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074719726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03135028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5795369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139977896","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249.013","title":"Dicey’s Administrative Law Blind Spot","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Venn diagram; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08294616676953988,"score_gpt":0.28377355353708156,"score_spread":0.2008273867675417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139977896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00203241,0.031453162,0.0008177098,0.057976983,0.003495514,0.00001890249,0.00008306157,0.00006145774,0.90406084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07013441,0.008288837,0.0008161464,0.030802239,0.0012482633,0.000050609462,0.00006631667,0.00007874053,0.8885145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983546,0.00035603892,0.000047581856,0.0003145354,0.0006136923,0.00031340987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990982,0.0003814893,0.000042843734,0.000063874,0.0002666648,0.00014692303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009764973,0.00050456845,0.00035652067,0.0017310558,0.0071147857,0.008223192,0.0007021473,0.0036923513,0.02063127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040942538,0.00043676826,0.000182656,0.0012464088,0.0054568104,0.0044670096,0.002349281,0.0059957183,0.0036235666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012216227,0.000006841047,0.00008499983,0.00003686382,0.0000011333457,0.00011605432,0.0016779879,0.000030405303,0.000056882753,0.4897348,0.49476063,0.013481196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012330281,0.000003151547,0.000104950486,0.00004076381,5.027162e-7,0.000059865743,0.0002474593,0.00002028548,0.000045224988,0.009044989,0.9904281,0.000003418314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027308637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053728145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027308637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064786184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043562185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06901854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140244933","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Torts Tomorrow - a Tribute to John Fleming Edited by Nicholas JMullany and Allen M Linden","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Honour; Tort; Scholarship; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.006978418648179334,"score_gpt":0.2895823499447976,"score_spread":0.28260393129661826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140244933","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019759918,0.84432095,0.00022554267,0.05207753,0.056211572,0.000040296214,0.00023977934,0.000079237514,0.046607476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022264365,0.6209289,0.00044099402,0.03003886,0.032148913,0.000102699676,0.0004665443,0.00011475763,0.31353185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896336,0.00017281553,0.000060525723,0.00011721508,0.0006100445,0.000076026394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971902,0.0008869187,0.00018208155,0.00009878448,0.0012699345,0.00037209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096613,0.0013217095,0.0018140388,0.0030142583,0.0018777873,0.0051605166,0.0011251963,0.0026034168,0.054676883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050296425,0.00067469507,0.0007132071,0.004767804,0.0011476666,0.0037713998,0.001538284,0.0044284496,0.030060383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040489044,0.000007036629,0.00001837952,0.00019405044,0.0000030175397,0.000016323434,0.00003216681,0.000021082918,0.000021737811,0.0006820567,0.97876394,0.02023609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024412157,0.000006160942,0.00017440262,0.0007975415,0.000003982635,0.00007278522,0.00004976716,0.0000087016715,0.000012019317,0.00038882304,0.9984785,0.0000048983284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017270392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03570355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054676883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036207926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006941478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18291241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140706674","doi":"","title":"Making Sense of the Victim’s Role in Clemency Decision Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Democracy; Process (computing); Law and economics; Law; Decision-making; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.0175197173505355,"score_gpt":0.34357691084137104,"score_spread":0.32605719349083556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140706674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3900319,0.0030749824,0.04173181,0.06044482,0.00058822247,0.00021456019,0.000031416082,0.0000800187,0.50380224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924075,0.00030002906,0.0008739838,0.0018972642,0.000060479786,0.000032776967,0.000008385084,0.000011363512,0.0044083926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9524792,0.03583988,0.00080831104,0.0020590574,0.0039956355,0.004817887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96108264,0.027907481,0.004479425,0.0021014935,0.0022116853,0.0022172395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033001177,0.00061323924,0.0007792751,0.0033340727,0.016099498,0.019280702,0.0026187706,0.008235634,0.00730452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053391702,0.00040790564,0.0006517265,0.0017108805,0.048251428,0.01295422,0.0136866,0.007556022,0.0006983305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042090203,0.000083099636,0.008345305,0.00008084722,0.000034091925,0.0016615539,0.299157,0.0003578773,0.0003852329,0.6719662,0.0028653385,0.015021471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023457063,0.0001172634,0.0067623323,0.00084577536,0.000046178622,0.0019217207,0.5382645,0.0017468989,0.001016266,0.3193163,0.12981878,0.00012050797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056569437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053639063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033001177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054363455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008621069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17452896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141775535","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.30","title":"The Rule of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Comparative law; Law; Relation (database); Political science; Rule of law; Philosophy of law; Municipal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.059381543116924215,"score_gpt":0.3420947793568676,"score_spread":0.2827132362399434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141775535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00774585,0.012800056,0.05449371,0.08050118,0.0017516611,0.00011800985,0.00033382326,0.00018961234,0.8420661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75965667,0.016662115,0.033803053,0.03424735,0.0044417353,0.0006059205,0.00053959055,0.00034547297,0.14969824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880896,0.0034174302,0.0006535561,0.0030428667,0.003674362,0.0011221925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325484,0.0034819667,0.00059637864,0.0012997827,0.0010490434,0.00031798397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007845672,0.00052776537,0.0010094191,0.0014513218,0.005883352,0.013687025,0.0015996387,0.0058293836,0.008945701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014757718,0.00050805236,0.00085229904,0.0012062202,0.040553667,0.0114167025,0.0047753016,0.009004858,0.0036307594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015119615,0.0000024790716,0.000044607998,0.000011158978,0.0000016946898,0.000011069561,0.00024612297,0.000054768396,0.00001712737,0.99524564,0.0023526454,0.0020111867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047981116,0.000007978133,0.00011058137,0.0000959486,0.0000032004282,0.00004697746,0.00020969057,0.00015499644,0.000061956634,0.8766968,0.12259806,0.000008921954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009825661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004471561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013687025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057780957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009462592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041923165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141839934","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511558696.006","title":"Glossary and list of abbreviations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Glossary; Computer science; Natural language processing; Information retrieval; Library science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04398244953503608,"score_gpt":0.2375905847057855,"score_spread":0.19360813517074943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141839934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007945696,0.039908536,0.011584395,0.0052758204,0.009008549,0.0017433742,0.22940664,0.0028950192,0.69938314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058636125,0.06651248,0.023410365,0.00505234,0.0045088236,0.0029574933,0.27022952,0.0055875476,0.6158778],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882513,0.00018065146,0.00024858367,0.0002231701,0.00046008558,0.00006239159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953577,0.0016752498,0.0004292727,0.0005015051,0.0018233453,0.00021291497],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010111511,0.0019169981,0.0019018747,0.013939199,0.0022771107,0.0049369778,0.002399505,0.001379674,0.51636773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009257949,0.0010400603,0.00086168566,0.018317282,0.0010912586,0.0057830284,0.0020556785,0.0031589349,0.3529508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021215747,0.000019934892,0.00007653801,0.0020974337,0.000006326936,0.000102680984,0.00020817276,0.00012752194,0.00029371542,0.013088262,0.9398532,0.044105105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021441185,0.0000036174015,0.00009928956,0.00048842723,0.0000035536411,0.00006541943,0.00003739493,0.000017815173,0.0000420763,0.0015543168,0.99767965,0.000006283491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012540561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01462309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51636773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027239996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029502613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6898427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142295970","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1399627","title":"Accessing Insolvent Consumer Debtors, Challenges and Strategies for Empirical Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Business; Blockchain; Empirical research; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.1729166579989637,"score_gpt":0.47400573370559274,"score_spread":0.301089075706629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142295970","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4025023,0.031581346,0.01527896,0.45924693,0.0006171461,0.0017925231,0.0029246332,0.000071545495,0.085984625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282918,0.023139782,0.011616927,0.02570705,0.0011784359,0.0023208198,0.00083504786,0.000051011484,0.006859117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9484765,0.039344177,0.0029178886,0.001978023,0.0039534736,0.003329878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5750575,0.3541635,0.016183274,0.016059952,0.0313436,0.0071922494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.081651025,0.00062138634,0.0018812984,0.0060152225,0.007860231,0.021230591,0.005264452,0.007744063,0.019917732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34488758,0.00091474055,0.00046338516,0.016280293,0.009986403,0.05365602,0.007583429,0.009644924,0.0018905443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004108172,0.0036448266,0.21712986,0.0023475073,0.00011883632,0.0009886603,0.11374323,0.00090579846,0.00039359432,0.3926573,0.060243253,0.20741634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015131586,0.00030509886,0.04748526,0.008097456,0.00013747948,0.00046034032,0.48118898,0.005563761,0.00054566964,0.41142347,0.044506617,0.00013455283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045980208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06406016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081651025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075985123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022655724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43181705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143561997","doi":"","title":"What makes a good law of security","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapters","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law; Legislation; Commission; Flexibility (engineering); Security interest; Personal property; Government (linguistics); Business; Law reform; Law and economics; Political science; Property (philosophy); Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06772309781639028,"score_gpt":0.3411578870906921,"score_spread":0.2734347892743018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143561997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013232002,0.014259837,0.035460513,0.43584955,0.004141189,0.0001500583,0.00024927413,0.0002646123,0.49639305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73704034,0.015669921,0.031124638,0.09548745,0.0069110994,0.0003567962,0.00028037923,0.00041164257,0.11271774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864356,0.005415317,0.0006723727,0.0013764795,0.0045390334,0.0015611292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835121,0.008316287,0.0012067658,0.0030102483,0.0027609922,0.0011936055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012492735,0.00056588295,0.0011263523,0.0017604328,0.006898348,0.012016059,0.001485629,0.008829907,0.007416646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024202239,0.00078533206,0.00094619184,0.001074052,0.05008467,0.025025984,0.0037603264,0.008866241,0.0036312412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029553685,0.000009499021,0.000102732854,0.000036446647,0.0000051284783,0.000037193997,0.0008274916,0.00009540069,0.000049412014,0.98889714,0.0076501276,0.0022863098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009358829,0.00001183121,0.00023144633,0.00019472495,0.0000056482827,0.00006443745,0.000772119,0.00010591365,0.00011190658,0.8682245,0.1302531,0.000015019672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075343978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051652826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012492735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053652856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008456943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06606865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144418566","doi":"","title":"Clarifying Causation in Tort","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Tort; Law; Jurisprudence; Common law; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Liability","score_opus":0.028507608875246778,"score_gpt":0.31494653009856344,"score_spread":0.28643892122331666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144418566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051176973,0.03417944,0.28728017,0.17182623,0.004653922,0.0002115216,0.00017900311,0.00023973966,0.45025295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186184,0.010887986,0.037577204,0.012048236,0.0012168362,0.00013285258,0.00009247341,0.000062557934,0.019363387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919565,0.0042740763,0.00041690932,0.00072039315,0.0017222565,0.0009098376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99084467,0.006756618,0.0006077616,0.0006119673,0.0010108922,0.00016814133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011581112,0.00079440593,0.00073763524,0.0041640447,0.009325406,0.007339963,0.0018534635,0.005466093,0.004155372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018075822,0.0005041646,0.00074548175,0.0016819286,0.042652536,0.0152817005,0.00871512,0.0063546794,0.0003875003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.215336e-7,9.455228e-7,0.00006278131,0.000008298867,6.908745e-7,0.000049889553,0.0014225079,0.00009912501,0.000020632993,0.9966838,0.00035234666,0.0012982646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035001813,0.0000063244365,0.00028610128,0.00015801731,0.0000064903656,0.00015335703,0.0025869254,0.0004714634,0.00014410078,0.9200849,0.07608737,0.00001144262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05142676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047923777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05142676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014948764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012855636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10846138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145954647","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249.008","title":"Lectures Introductory to the Law of the Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitution; Law; Salary; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Sociology; Classics; History; Political science; Commercial law","score_opus":0.02646494808809045,"score_gpt":0.22600364383944405,"score_spread":0.1995386957513536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145954647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056039455,0.041109283,0.00071219174,0.009522779,0.0041324,0.000020418154,0.000313245,0.00010726861,0.94352204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009607575,0.014155688,0.0005197448,0.002328988,0.0016946802,0.000028965265,0.0002657028,0.0000906288,0.97130805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969935,0.000073048584,0.000012492169,0.00005142154,0.00010285069,0.00006081661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969614,0.00012345327,0.000018985365,0.000023826431,0.00006751185,0.00007013765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035540777,0.00082667737,0.00038508017,0.0011439583,0.0017579835,0.0023968369,0.0005502318,0.0013431298,0.1909364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011186469,0.0003446734,0.0003093657,0.0011340912,0.0014756093,0.0021568523,0.0011244564,0.0025395704,0.05318288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011748619,0.00004739283,0.00015408732,0.00009421739,0.0000019522256,0.00007004247,0.00054391805,0.000107339925,0.00023468639,0.10144855,0.8516332,0.0456528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013558265,0.00000382196,0.0002943344,0.00012051671,5.285732e-7,0.000027496182,0.000109408924,0.000027124159,0.000021430658,0.010651784,0.9887405,0.0000017181623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081858225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02498399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1909364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036298747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018090404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6387459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146721543","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2020.788","title":"A Compelling Case: Exploring the Law of Disclosures After NIFLA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.05425171386841946,"score_gpt":0.28171592817121016,"score_spread":0.2274642143027907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146721543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017769428,0.009971491,0.005152069,0.656966,0.003980924,0.00022301196,0.0003439672,0.00012843424,0.30546466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33769828,0.0055635166,0.0041353297,0.58163124,0.008325612,0.00087545003,0.00015573154,0.0001207472,0.061494205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9633707,0.0138348555,0.0020597866,0.005185281,0.009615509,0.0059338124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89035314,0.092997774,0.0043997094,0.002955254,0.006348319,0.0029457824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043989506,0.00087356573,0.001679223,0.0034637495,0.015971273,0.019951465,0.005963652,0.06763324,0.007760587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1278075,0.0017973558,0.0019329682,0.0023712767,0.017323133,0.012647842,0.0062118005,0.040055867,0.0013628438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055528057,0.000062365754,0.0009830403,0.00009209313,0.00003140562,0.0009915222,0.0010522156,0.00020114065,0.00013572646,0.88554806,0.10337467,0.0074722245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003579705,0.00016546423,0.0043392642,0.002074407,0.00024953065,0.0013039729,0.003322888,0.0025086172,0.0009589171,0.4245538,0.55992043,0.00024471935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0459429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078873575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06763324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010688804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024497526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23264152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147685787","doi":"","title":"Remedies in Canadian Administrative Law: A Roadmap to a Parallel Legal Universe","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Law; Political science; Tribunal; Judicial review; Public law; Private law; Supreme court; Common law; Municipal law; Precedent","score_opus":0.033361746254337146,"score_gpt":0.32192390856512504,"score_spread":0.2885621623107879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147685787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015197275,0.09297576,0.01706288,0.2875359,0.0027230436,0.00027182096,0.00051715004,0.00044388385,0.5832722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66060376,0.14435749,0.057728928,0.044887614,0.0026644005,0.00034152495,0.000563124,0.00038756352,0.08846559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822144,0.0027446996,0.0006443871,0.0012731828,0.009932171,0.0031911677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97861665,0.0052865176,0.0006955792,0.0012107897,0.012071308,0.0021192594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010344913,0.0011132444,0.0013182027,0.014928345,0.025784757,0.025168391,0.005173765,0.007239591,0.010174296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018837376,0.0009562411,0.0015848216,0.011795988,0.04868761,0.0097194305,0.006699899,0.010002307,0.0007118793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007975945,0.000027324504,0.0006260696,0.00014606831,0.000009689646,0.00009321566,0.0031867048,0.00079684414,0.00011342294,0.92878747,0.024900693,0.041304454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018932164,0.00002230288,0.0069986274,0.0011389888,0.000038772363,0.00011849541,0.007432746,0.0021620695,0.0002753425,0.20286348,0.7787784,0.00015186843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98857003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9913659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29245797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29245797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42408884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8206485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147698584","doi":"10.29173/alr2642","title":"Toward a Framework to Define the Outer Boundaries of Good Faith in Contractual Performance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Doctrine; Good faith; Transactional leadership; Variance (accounting); Context (archaeology); Law; Supreme court; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Public relations; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03567066301692753,"score_gpt":0.32566717945236323,"score_spread":0.2899965164354357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147698584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029160367,0.010743195,0.43393987,0.07165042,0.0004632649,0.0005348709,0.00021466747,0.00018297948,0.45311043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82106704,0.0028518254,0.16258064,0.004394471,0.0003382132,0.0006527231,0.00011989447,0.00010063173,0.007894636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98064786,0.012046199,0.0010093906,0.0016259205,0.0029534884,0.001717122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807324,0.011104009,0.0021402405,0.0020153376,0.0028180056,0.0011900394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026176773,0.00095997145,0.0011130378,0.009519342,0.009543421,0.019076696,0.0036926512,0.0076168985,0.0031574517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01950756,0.0009778352,0.001337047,0.004129114,0.089900196,0.01617695,0.007832706,0.011105505,0.0005551602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.68711e-7,0.0000033963377,0.00009734514,0.0000049627242,7.3835116e-7,0.000009790305,0.00076698075,0.000108907174,0.000011241619,0.99792767,0.00016095268,0.00090709864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054063785,0.000010000333,0.00053131324,0.00011867995,0.0000033457234,0.000037676524,0.0017255025,0.00082313624,0.00005353959,0.98349947,0.013175947,0.000016003149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025252594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026152479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017422393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020606088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13843763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147890403","doi":"10.29173/mlj1262","title":"Hryniak Comes to Manitoba: The Evolution of Manitoba Civil Procedure in the 2010s","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Queen (butterfly); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.025582168611723962,"score_gpt":0.2875323233228425,"score_spread":0.26195015471111854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147890403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69656974,0.014243653,0.00186257,0.095160715,0.00086207484,0.00026459486,0.0007565415,0.000114921604,0.1901652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88735867,0.00543644,0.0020726603,0.015220905,0.00009988178,0.00007918974,0.00021276354,0.00007926697,0.08944031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967526,0.0003744222,0.00007604995,0.00033317352,0.0009157314,0.001548053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961784,0.00057461014,0.00037904186,0.00015542975,0.001487989,0.0012245334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019274859,0.0002957168,0.00038460433,0.0020606264,0.021639472,0.0068677287,0.0023360427,0.002546116,0.00563932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004776988,0.0008614746,0.0004136622,0.0033923134,0.010589517,0.001426336,0.004576216,0.005096727,0.00049927825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002980928,0.0003579417,0.112662636,0.00068387704,0.00012467636,0.0077089523,0.15509269,0.0024244564,0.006586287,0.49660707,0.071411535,0.14604187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032296026,0.00012854137,0.22832964,0.0009905363,0.00006815605,0.00083183555,0.07489509,0.000868751,0.0017358962,0.0071842363,0.68476546,0.00016962286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99761474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1763578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1763578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2618758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9553082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148448447","doi":"","title":"Class Action Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Compensation (psychology); Value (mathematics); Action (physics); Mechanism (biology); Collective action; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.02529082027929083,"score_gpt":0.3466617663063745,"score_spread":0.3213709460270837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148448447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042177595,0.00065868313,0.00852236,0.00909235,0.00026767657,0.00015186786,0.00045842325,0.00006219302,0.9386088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305941,0.00032550844,0.0017159226,0.0017455219,0.0001895206,0.00010136899,0.0002524276,0.000027939497,0.06504776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877507,0.0023617286,0.00033573637,0.0012964787,0.005666333,0.0025891112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872197,0.0031219851,0.0012046803,0.0018847148,0.004655155,0.0019138553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075944182,0.0004348721,0.00055075355,0.002659248,0.0048580286,0.006673289,0.0016250329,0.002401,0.032650594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023353832,0.00015829549,0.00040920507,0.0019040701,0.0067255055,0.003443315,0.0032178469,0.0021281901,0.0021770524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003238547,0.000055604167,0.013641997,0.000048793034,0.000029281782,0.00012926396,0.0023526466,0.00033700507,0.00020634643,0.9260529,0.013493226,0.043620545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048553975,0.00013636977,0.06270796,0.00047330162,0.00012199067,0.00052160386,0.007331593,0.0016160669,0.0007042949,0.36003965,0.56621546,0.00008323715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06750377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06750377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012087345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00994727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13422173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149062924","doi":"","title":"Contract Damages, Moral Agency, and Henry James’ The Ambassadors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Moral agency; Financial compensation; Agency cost; Law; Breach of contract; Economics; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01186437919129495,"score_gpt":0.2779666929876836,"score_spread":0.26610231379638866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149062924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060652625,0.010418323,0.012516541,0.12728366,0.0020662202,0.00007883347,0.00005274429,0.00006532284,0.7868657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9001487,0.0017603996,0.002182027,0.010182326,0.0011034284,0.00006791309,0.000011144768,0.00004044685,0.08450365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507207,0.002086739,0.00012585259,0.0005843077,0.0014674267,0.00066347455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793124,0.0010769106,0.00028737247,0.00021176953,0.00023527109,0.00025730906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004954096,0.00048656258,0.0003994215,0.00085777196,0.006469436,0.008972903,0.0011948365,0.006224851,0.0067493673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008739917,0.00032361047,0.00035704806,0.0003997089,0.028638626,0.0062354915,0.0042509018,0.009250211,0.0006100368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043144996,0.0000073189135,0.000036157817,0.0000073058527,0.0000011696432,0.000037889597,0.001963349,0.000043581305,0.000029828165,0.99407613,0.0023391475,0.0014536879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024452527,0.000038095564,0.0003716529,0.00013601287,0.000008601796,0.00024647074,0.0039468524,0.00038087333,0.00025422426,0.6777592,0.31679875,0.000034692686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076559493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005176829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008972903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008850592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035020823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06421584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149520621","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249.004","title":"The Biggest Legal Mind We Have","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Cabinet (room); Jurisprudence; Politics; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04032835336190529,"score_gpt":0.24426550029503544,"score_spread":0.20393714693313014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149520621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030308163,0.026215333,0.0011461877,0.15713356,0.0044557066,0.00001181806,0.0000698306,0.00007523233,0.80786145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20059085,0.013915393,0.0022595662,0.08421521,0.0040649627,0.000053606665,0.00016444581,0.00015675944,0.6945792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979372,0.0007023065,0.00004190361,0.00035763188,0.0005511418,0.00040989794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816626,0.00058174774,0.000092459595,0.00020702906,0.0003721519,0.0005803445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016214587,0.00041675344,0.00038289864,0.0009124372,0.011057499,0.010792338,0.0008207294,0.0040293746,0.029211903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044081397,0.00030705347,0.00023417424,0.00058175606,0.014468596,0.010930052,0.0057180454,0.007803629,0.0056146644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000873724,0.000012516043,0.0002454179,0.000047933074,0.0000024210688,0.000094532516,0.008183574,0.000020062169,0.00007083529,0.7311474,0.23410374,0.026062695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014787084,0.0000029387052,0.00010987876,0.0001305043,9.0708824e-7,0.000095776464,0.0022749025,0.0000142033805,0.000024337074,0.032639835,0.9647006,0.000004685431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014880066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028828975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029211903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005654777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057801125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09772354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150515959","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.191","title":"PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC RIGHT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Private law; Law; Tort; Unjust enrichment; Public law; Public interest; Political science; Economic Justice; Exclusive right; Common law; Commercial law; Liability; Law and economics; Normative; Private rights; Business; Sociology; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.02653600188505005,"score_gpt":0.2331907195830554,"score_spread":0.20665471769800536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150515959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008423177,0.011327604,0.031307414,0.08398916,0.0010569121,0.0000562699,0.00012607424,0.000086985376,0.8636264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79148465,0.0088104615,0.010037624,0.0381079,0.0037576964,0.0002721687,0.00019203557,0.00018219122,0.14715526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992648,0.0029549862,0.00029244655,0.0013988535,0.0014539951,0.001251773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572515,0.0026002512,0.00032276998,0.00068786705,0.00041858424,0.00024550574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006356104,0.0006912381,0.00055473705,0.0012197858,0.008309741,0.0103771435,0.0009818316,0.009853047,0.017526152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065963212,0.00040372467,0.0008964988,0.0012312821,0.045601778,0.015021245,0.0077855624,0.010930618,0.002630793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015576624,0.0000022824797,0.000014296511,0.000004859483,5.9214227e-7,0.0000065550835,0.0001816847,0.000017969058,0.000007990918,0.9982332,0.0007195686,0.0008094564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009026579,0.0000082354745,0.000070601585,0.00004703434,0.0000029759065,0.0000428159,0.00021347441,0.00009311529,0.00006924336,0.9352657,0.06417139,0.000006367482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045822607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027982392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017526152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007680231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058630824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152063298","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3637","title":"Equity: Conscience Goes to Market by Irit Samet","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Conscience; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.036901781067282605,"score_gpt":0.3616943035151548,"score_spread":0.3247925224478722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152063298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021239853,0.017425727,0.0034207643,0.3899503,0.004032697,0.000024593708,0.000045156135,0.000045005403,0.5638159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7301373,0.0059247357,0.0009370548,0.07385663,0.003013357,0.000046475405,0.000019989966,0.00007502578,0.18598936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824345,0.000610562,0.00005340587,0.00033229426,0.0004921179,0.000268231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820507,0.0010748674,0.00010356492,0.00012452395,0.00027412924,0.00021782576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028101332,0.00025960934,0.00031725282,0.00044706883,0.005958388,0.0067178295,0.00068486284,0.003917824,0.0058126803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006427606,0.0001956926,0.00022906423,0.00035768637,0.011006873,0.007293409,0.0026831322,0.008489742,0.0012012246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000145164495,0.000019116122,0.00021665795,0.00001431072,0.0000021392334,0.00013302098,0.002920626,0.00008372112,0.00008067191,0.938262,0.05125746,0.0069957757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019914263,0.000033850825,0.001060135,0.00017338556,0.000006268327,0.0002514378,0.0031631947,0.00062221184,0.0002780904,0.5598394,0.43452293,0.000029082803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067465547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008473837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067465547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033415346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026197871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024244666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152461280","doi":"","title":"Intention, Recklessness and Misfeasance in Public Office","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Recklessness; Tort; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Harm; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.01575088365514697,"score_gpt":0.29165534759628897,"score_spread":0.275904463941142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152461280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2522691,0.0051735817,0.039099235,0.037361663,0.00040545932,0.00020282278,0.00011319177,0.00006702241,0.66530794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801328,0.0009578128,0.002363681,0.0019687223,0.00015374408,0.00008091514,0.000016539232,0.000010220066,0.014315548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960334,0.0013103771,0.0002912039,0.00041559504,0.0011848424,0.00076448487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403423,0.0036169486,0.0010330253,0.0005981195,0.00040294795,0.00031476122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038179965,0.00038521786,0.00041173815,0.0013406599,0.0031840783,0.0069467225,0.0009689097,0.005584189,0.003082549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071383165,0.00041206507,0.00058488594,0.0006719634,0.03139581,0.0055090524,0.0048048845,0.005404013,0.00035438366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063688217,0.000019574461,0.0005603054,0.00001099303,0.0000021531753,0.00010975824,0.0014380489,0.0001262222,0.00008554496,0.995002,0.00046520526,0.0021738764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026383334,0.000073481875,0.0042566177,0.00017989101,0.000021760885,0.0005765291,0.0032882898,0.00092277525,0.0006546799,0.9549742,0.034981098,0.000044410415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006965447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071920515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006965447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002931917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034289572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02127266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153162905","doi":"","title":"Discrimination and the Private Law in Canada: Reflections on Spence v. BMO Trust Co.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Political science; Legislation; Testamentary trust; Public law; Sexual orientation; Conflict of laws; Private law; Choice of law; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01820394833459508,"score_gpt":0.3092328237729929,"score_spread":0.2910288754383978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153162905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050833937,0.03986406,0.0009172492,0.69218534,0.003028756,0.00018550531,0.0005810843,0.00004742674,0.21235669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47016385,0.029570164,0.0021076794,0.3768304,0.0011638023,0.00013763497,0.00020847072,0.0000975004,0.11972057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888131,0.0009996614,0.00026741423,0.0009168677,0.004924907,0.004077963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919714,0.0025893976,0.00032608066,0.00015600302,0.0028427376,0.0021142727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048314296,0.00052360643,0.00059976015,0.0025626668,0.051180217,0.0130007,0.0033414108,0.016022537,0.0050200587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086357845,0.0008135902,0.00090441277,0.0037460218,0.01938933,0.0040117754,0.003975161,0.015234158,0.00033672657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049852708,0.00010388145,0.0047447,0.00023878737,0.000037982983,0.0019593237,0.038945943,0.00063361326,0.00072158506,0.6523709,0.27662215,0.023571339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058728747,0.000052946856,0.016160106,0.00090517633,0.000089719215,0.00040854583,0.034579024,0.00084033835,0.000566781,0.02900272,0.9169887,0.00034708585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99807006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24890156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24890156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37107602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8711677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154155133","doi":"","title":"THE MANDATE AND THE TRUST","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Faculty of Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Mandate; Political science; Legislature; Romanian; Public administration; Commercial law","score_opus":0.1586390443506639,"score_gpt":0.3630342555713076,"score_spread":0.2043952112206437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154155133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026349518,0.0029242653,0.011612274,0.054530554,0.00066736253,0.00006694945,0.000082241786,0.00008128116,0.9036855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9243931,0.0010430072,0.0019361082,0.0062826145,0.00036959854,0.000094967654,0.000051650797,0.00006060571,0.06576831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889409,0.0048538023,0.00047388233,0.0015408885,0.0022208851,0.0019697156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362516,0.0016812496,0.00072956784,0.0012333986,0.0012607756,0.001469857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008564532,0.00024321685,0.0004167161,0.00072468835,0.007317501,0.008209557,0.0009330698,0.003209328,0.0076509155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013689305,0.00033982832,0.00033408648,0.0007316742,0.01962359,0.0062828544,0.007938426,0.0046966285,0.002112836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005922141,0.000005957296,0.00023336649,0.000009577428,0.0000018375233,0.000040686158,0.0020588043,0.000030387642,0.000042924446,0.9895752,0.0044962564,0.0034991307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020373978,0.000046137633,0.0017040841,0.00029203127,0.000012503752,0.000256064,0.0039513377,0.00040167055,0.00025783997,0.41466215,0.5783646,0.000031271622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007961295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008463155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008564532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006553568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009946176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047549725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154178843","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3309910","title":"Equitable Remedies for Contractual Breach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Business; Law; Damages; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029154402873013158,"score_gpt":0.34061500465511696,"score_spread":0.3114606017821038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154178843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13028547,0.0043024323,0.21903776,0.066709526,0.0017529431,0.0014991243,0.0003490986,0.0007011207,0.5753625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447437,0.0006603331,0.016609253,0.002777272,0.0006671777,0.00042797948,0.000052532218,0.00007444925,0.033987235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96622443,0.00995753,0.0022712348,0.003431325,0.013004312,0.00511108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520326,0.025503283,0.004368239,0.010721771,0.0058200904,0.0015539681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022624105,0.00093430275,0.002135946,0.005051577,0.007536213,0.008647877,0.0050254255,0.019871624,0.019413369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118488654,0.0010988122,0.0012745976,0.0018248118,0.009685293,0.009282715,0.008232395,0.012427196,0.0015754168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065429034,0.00019029417,0.0005854574,0.00007143018,0.00003570717,0.00019981818,0.00047696952,0.0036500802,0.00024017249,0.9664375,0.005871009,0.022176195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011391105,0.00009917343,0.0012525934,0.00020262561,0.000065939865,0.00026117306,0.00052037917,0.010024967,0.000390507,0.9715328,0.0154955685,0.00004043471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057617105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007413052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022624105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042788177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013096811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11964911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155053350","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1406","title":"Games of Jurisdiction: How Local Governance Realities Challenge the “Creatures of the Province” Doctrine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Citizenship; Political science; Local government; Politics; Democracy; Law; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Public administration; Corporate governance; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.0191491250447018,"score_gpt":0.30860168624758355,"score_spread":0.28945256120288176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155053350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29147804,0.0020870147,0.015702872,0.06952799,0.00018118945,0.000077809644,0.00016615957,0.000106090505,0.6206728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931411,0.00014425385,0.00039536963,0.00041743767,0.000011620447,0.000010164768,0.000010829238,0.000016302069,0.005852947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559754,0.0020327547,0.00005525755,0.00039441622,0.00063201116,0.0012879753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968232,0.0011792614,0.00021002717,0.0004180611,0.00063721667,0.00073240226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038259246,0.00023459594,0.00049476686,0.00082523626,0.016773146,0.01394458,0.0021117749,0.002798942,0.0061009554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008319885,0.00032615455,0.00037319478,0.001185548,0.049992915,0.0058645876,0.005905115,0.0027264964,0.0003727418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013961752,0.0000052309306,0.0012935416,0.000016140237,0.000005523389,0.00013034957,0.034506135,0.00062948803,0.00009000516,0.9570144,0.0035860117,0.0027091014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056882098,0.000021889677,0.0056004846,0.00014849959,0.000034255438,0.000100729776,0.096852325,0.0034877907,0.00025505095,0.72567207,0.16771355,0.0000564892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.753831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8444991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.753831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058458503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028788865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4952374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155689419","doi":"10.21991/cf29416","title":"The Common Good and Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Originalism; Natural law; Witness; Common law; Legal realism; Intelligibility (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Legal profession; Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01283745146986231,"score_gpt":0.29227039320821185,"score_spread":0.27943294173834954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155689419","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083061674,0.0123510575,0.00018977509,0.97923297,0.001790687,0.0000044771077,0.000008842695,0.000008242597,0.0055832984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17802405,0.02585852,0.0016081729,0.76496404,0.009228701,0.00008186766,0.00003719471,0.00012830687,0.020069076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96197164,0.020628553,0.00083618826,0.0034076904,0.009847887,0.0033079537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9502719,0.03564105,0.0012258888,0.001139018,0.008290335,0.00343167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032703105,0.00095498323,0.0024701417,0.003365194,0.03482179,0.019265885,0.0057287444,0.027103484,0.004034334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046005223,0.0009803972,0.00095160457,0.0043589165,0.09070759,0.01743451,0.009427611,0.042995464,0.00072575297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003542095,0.000026966349,0.00025995498,0.000116525465,0.0000123015625,0.0003401759,0.026800858,0.00017345842,0.000069885304,0.5591082,0.40623263,0.0068235965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005625522,0.000016004687,0.000632388,0.0007620119,0.0000207538,0.00020040433,0.037104096,0.0005308984,0.00016978875,0.20185633,0.75850576,0.00014527095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5052402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56502634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5052402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07866007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05924511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155948963","doi":"","title":"Effective Remediation in Public Procurement: Contract Damages Versus Judicial Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Procurement; Liability; Principal (computer security); Business; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03529498335691351,"score_gpt":0.3300951700995676,"score_spread":0.2948001867426541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155948963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076772265,0.05149465,0.10737107,0.22867197,0.0014195858,0.00061236013,0.00006320212,0.0001702413,0.5334247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592306,0.006030476,0.00861298,0.010172038,0.0008981613,0.0001512972,0.000010182514,0.000028948421,0.0148652205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91435874,0.04598943,0.0030281257,0.0051305033,0.021216577,0.010276617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8926345,0.083324805,0.009689491,0.0043662754,0.007948012,0.0020368265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05106217,0.0004960735,0.0014755053,0.0034887781,0.0079199225,0.018782454,0.0036673185,0.014810496,0.003709892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08476089,0.00080148346,0.0008388902,0.0025655327,0.03721046,0.009608636,0.00763247,0.008103946,0.0004896837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013353294,0.000023804003,0.00042026964,0.00009695647,0.000017699977,0.00019074019,0.0015760397,0.0010043958,0.00016524765,0.97864383,0.0027576918,0.015089958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012544646,0.00017844455,0.0026868652,0.0009293854,0.00008966605,0.00057420233,0.004547395,0.0040569836,0.0012040879,0.87332225,0.112136595,0.00014873968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029493496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042208113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05106217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021186294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27004576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156449470","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttaa095","title":"Parent fiduciary breach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.09019037692478345,"score_gpt":0.34451523927185185,"score_spread":0.2543248623470684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156449470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17185515,0.0016117389,0.03516616,0.08097671,0.0013362383,0.00024177744,0.00021322849,0.0003600502,0.70823896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92050713,0.00034078496,0.0026474318,0.008706541,0.00014623541,0.0001059503,0.00004583286,0.000055935063,0.06744405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98235554,0.007160374,0.0013957246,0.0018884027,0.004594592,0.0026053395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749141,0.011025877,0.003148242,0.0049936823,0.0045818663,0.0013363787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011530601,0.00021102183,0.0003323691,0.00057859806,0.0051250854,0.0043408256,0.00142342,0.005854294,0.01778173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05675779,0.00040605018,0.00036564106,0.000434994,0.0049952217,0.0048917704,0.0058872774,0.0064952164,0.0025771752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038902872,0.00005742978,0.010007211,0.0000619922,0.00001444471,0.0019998746,0.018882107,0.0002131542,0.0007873161,0.89827985,0.042441778,0.027215898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042769963,0.00029074633,0.019571597,0.0015845126,0.00007926243,0.007987054,0.032334764,0.0037525713,0.0057805576,0.22387896,0.7045554,0.00014170891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014587581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010250111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01778173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004115271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005415423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06098044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157412786","doi":"","title":"Scottish Law on Intestacy and Probate: Borrowing From the United States and Canada to Bring Scottish Law Out of Flux","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Probate; Legislation; Law; Common law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.012496208620902293,"score_gpt":0.2273973172427538,"score_spread":0.21490110862185152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157412786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11427989,0.0058906996,0.006393905,0.16592444,0.001405321,0.00010018326,0.0001824724,0.00016276537,0.7056603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8924129,0.0023617994,0.0028516615,0.03217058,0.00024678238,0.000042957494,0.00006528769,0.0000646658,0.06978341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990422,0.001589482,0.00031383522,0.0007227292,0.0037117875,0.0032401644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919167,0.0025149996,0.0003625523,0.0004867201,0.0034713747,0.0012476287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009028804,0.00041939475,0.00049374404,0.0016977547,0.019575054,0.011068407,0.0019248393,0.0047647147,0.004779716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020636259,0.00032461254,0.00072518404,0.0016398896,0.018904015,0.0042346707,0.007954244,0.0059656166,0.00038600084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027466622,0.000018819239,0.0022294733,0.000029301877,0.000011664167,0.0005462757,0.011100477,0.00029305412,0.00022042442,0.94778347,0.021310717,0.0164287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059022455,0.00009151085,0.012890498,0.0005348433,0.00008716459,0.0003549112,0.02380855,0.0014158085,0.0012577075,0.08767351,0.871637,0.00018945926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9261432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95309085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07385677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050267268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10852877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36471623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157495850","doi":"","title":"The Common Good and Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Originalism; Natural law; Legal realism; Political science; Common law; Sociology; Legal profession; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007177752051754811,"score_gpt":0.2913306774655743,"score_spread":0.2841529254138195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157495850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010696216,0.013182268,0.00022009513,0.97701955,0.0015191642,0.0000043277905,0.000009608025,0.000008639281,0.006966752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22774145,0.027083661,0.0016523984,0.71584594,0.00818176,0.00007974558,0.000038831215,0.00013001823,0.019246137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96596843,0.018823747,0.0007074994,0.0029912945,0.008568712,0.0029402801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512031,0.03554114,0.0012254459,0.0011657379,0.007801895,0.0030627793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030186325,0.00084769947,0.0023706565,0.0032400924,0.032547183,0.01746508,0.0051584877,0.025102574,0.0041589765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045248087,0.00093041407,0.00085388246,0.0044607944,0.088694155,0.016643502,0.00902164,0.038324874,0.00073860696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003355216,0.00002350049,0.0002654173,0.00010466164,0.000011199225,0.00030118256,0.025604704,0.00017050131,0.00006041555,0.6264169,0.3405797,0.0064283265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057705678,0.000016375407,0.0007119291,0.00078277005,0.000021918044,0.00020325131,0.035737637,0.00058024895,0.00016797402,0.25540268,0.70617515,0.00014231414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46754092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5186459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46754092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07128643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053225666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92963904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157619134","doi":"","title":"Married Couple, Single Recipient: Understanding the Exclusion of Gifts and Inheritances from Default Matrimonial Regimes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0841584033312976,"score_gpt":0.29756465331942483,"score_spread":0.21340624998812724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157619134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40054476,0.0037303262,0.02259284,0.017407725,0.00010030892,0.000072446725,0.000160725,0.000038463433,0.5553524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99023247,0.00074227137,0.0010147,0.0005951525,0.000026978507,0.00002128342,0.000032746266,0.000013915132,0.007320494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799746,0.000764602,0.00006282415,0.00019657664,0.00040840285,0.00057004933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844414,0.0005358199,0.000204189,0.00013576933,0.00039438604,0.00028563195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003800201,0.00022965006,0.00051942543,0.0016125913,0.01492528,0.0077780965,0.0019154031,0.0021795668,0.0041742465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047494015,0.0002652844,0.00032980953,0.001573396,0.024494017,0.006554859,0.0035195218,0.0027928133,0.00023943014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009767817,0.000012500414,0.0027388106,0.000014671916,0.0000028082875,0.0002793692,0.059897855,0.00011634496,0.00007586264,0.93236697,0.00071593135,0.003769167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044035238,0.00005305548,0.028266374,0.0005594509,0.000078009194,0.00079640816,0.16281295,0.0036197987,0.0003009571,0.590089,0.21331431,0.000065567525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7643347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7676545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7643347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032496694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022660153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47410637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158511735","doi":"","title":"Disability and Contractual Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Morality; Realm; Economic Justice; Social contract; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Intellectual disability; Politics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology; Duty","score_opus":0.012656126676289542,"score_gpt":0.3098059944890744,"score_spread":0.29714986781278485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158511735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021609984,0.0034524868,0.021833716,0.06758405,0.00034730654,0.000079435325,0.00010538827,0.000053643907,0.884934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558212,0.0017828918,0.0029192988,0.005817011,0.00026471223,0.0001676712,0.00009423449,0.000052749117,0.033080243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99169195,0.004271525,0.00036238652,0.00071736315,0.0017377639,0.0012190725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942391,0.003097432,0.00049488625,0.00056046736,0.0007557047,0.000852478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010207671,0.00037386495,0.00041704913,0.0009427022,0.005886106,0.010565995,0.0014958612,0.005031311,0.01272647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017301667,0.0003406105,0.0005032567,0.00078571116,0.026188724,0.010029333,0.005742452,0.0049558096,0.0018751007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027199521,0.0000041675808,0.000065170985,0.0000035150388,5.348981e-7,0.000015682843,0.0011964686,0.00005712726,0.000007626424,0.9966671,0.0010564474,0.000923493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007622277,0.0000093473045,0.00019830817,0.000063255924,0.0000011513471,0.000059095997,0.0018429621,0.00033933614,0.00002338022,0.956032,0.041414395,0.000009007735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006774559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032295482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01272647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007622187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054393676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055303037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159075066","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/x82yh","title":"Crime and Punishment: Adam Smith’s Theory of Sentimental Law and Economics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Punishment (psychology); Rational choice theory (criminology); Sanctions; Adam smith; Unintended consequences; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Public good; Feeling; Economics; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.03058037262613684,"score_gpt":0.2727778915553184,"score_spread":0.24219751892918157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159075066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028165493,0.013945415,0.048261076,0.1574216,0.0013388733,0.000076064294,0.00015215391,0.000047169346,0.7505921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8637664,0.0074395044,0.015442579,0.014389742,0.0021176152,0.00014830714,0.00005525489,0.000056271452,0.0965843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895215,0.00061409007,0.000027685292,0.00010269455,0.00020875834,0.0000946136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906653,0.00050346233,0.00012043228,0.000064629814,0.00016163765,0.000083345614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013759446,0.00049181,0.00036084367,0.001034928,0.0019161144,0.0034174884,0.00067088037,0.0022560263,0.0035183276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027551923,0.00024885024,0.0004239468,0.00087743154,0.012819626,0.0044169566,0.0013753899,0.0030308678,0.000611109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031381674,0.000005222675,0.000080442835,0.000008256796,0.0000020572088,0.000022562224,0.00024177345,0.00023971245,0.000010531769,0.99380857,0.003754328,0.0018235205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052346545,0.000004875737,0.00013027366,0.00001988118,0.0000019326928,0.000029043404,0.000096267046,0.0005308896,0.000019591867,0.9742896,0.024869151,0.0000032731964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003525634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028658162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003525634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034296596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016315954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024884105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159133818","doi":"","title":"Australia's 'Take' on Possession and Purchase Money Security Interest Priority Under the PPSA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Legislation; Statutory law; Personal property; Security interest; Law; Business; Property (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.058187437586224355,"score_gpt":0.35003873988471323,"score_spread":0.2918513022984889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159133818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105253786,0.001146092,0.0029969746,0.079167046,0.0015944266,0.00045064703,0.0011528638,0.00020461119,0.8080335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41442084,0.0009312076,0.0052614063,0.076046,0.00063276413,0.00034535475,0.00037774508,0.00007455997,0.50191003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377173,0.00068471365,0.00032045704,0.00067571434,0.003307734,0.0012396594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966723,0.0008410492,0.0002539573,0.0003504218,0.0012167771,0.0006655449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032382493,0.00026737954,0.0003125997,0.00063377776,0.0038860876,0.004332824,0.0009059216,0.006333025,0.00810558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008966621,0.0007079699,0.0005251389,0.0006053786,0.0026560186,0.0017152163,0.0032216832,0.0066222153,0.0019456494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007247992,0.00012081962,0.0057305917,0.00017713428,0.000019389963,0.0010258796,0.006350804,0.00026596672,0.003141122,0.7234927,0.22509083,0.034512214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050291106,0.00017172622,0.04063657,0.00025011788,0.00003463165,0.00055013946,0.00098305,0.0009528248,0.0010855999,0.025756663,0.92945373,0.000074700925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19787815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3010706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19787815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051305564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02474776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39345276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160179949","doi":"10.29173/mlj1161","title":"Introduction from the Manitoba Law Journal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03845436528131245,"score_gpt":0.27267531204167483,"score_spread":0.23422094676036237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160179949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084440433,0.08681567,0.00042588523,0.2523289,0.19397584,0.000213753,0.004112909,0.00045450003,0.4608281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039929734,0.030822376,0.0003547707,0.067981154,0.07287996,0.000110504305,0.0013022894,0.000294898,0.82226115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842143,0.00014209603,0.00011795846,0.00019747204,0.0009255439,0.00019558729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914215,0.0012446765,0.00036073057,0.00026105405,0.004953421,0.0017585417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014204767,0.0013363017,0.0010112509,0.0072234636,0.004968549,0.0066986196,0.0017692542,0.005051318,0.2252835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051663048,0.0010251919,0.0007414904,0.005131331,0.0016755094,0.0026256358,0.002483303,0.0046807695,0.072859675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000365704,0.000007946096,0.00006784809,0.000052106083,0.0000011463803,0.000026138068,0.000035620393,0.000009039425,0.00003116751,0.00084586407,0.993602,0.0053174393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004771983,0.0000046106093,0.0009721217,0.00026436188,0.0000024258932,0.000032833053,0.000086880995,0.0000099982,0.000017536498,0.00056728674,0.9980307,0.0000064462183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15662603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39612502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2252835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012165424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015930414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7536484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160186883","doi":"","title":"Has the Golden Age of Fraud Passed","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diligence; Position (finance); Law; Due diligence; Aside; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01836855299632907,"score_gpt":0.2837761312094594,"score_spread":0.2654075782131303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160186883","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04498639,0.012141011,0.0013219984,0.7029142,0.006174334,0.000017041046,0.00020699472,0.000030234492,0.23220779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7950497,0.0073056403,0.00054393936,0.1527366,0.0056282617,0.000032892145,0.00013663637,0.00006548668,0.038500812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890075,0.0030286042,0.00048425767,0.0016044654,0.002410163,0.0034650837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98049,0.008455717,0.003299424,0.0018959958,0.0024043021,0.0034545232],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01506441,0.00024178244,0.0006520719,0.0015234605,0.0076597724,0.016494408,0.001343822,0.01630478,0.016312629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052346546,0.00047894602,0.0005426208,0.0012927996,0.021544153,0.02616139,0.0068136314,0.014012334,0.0034405752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007132282,0.00002940145,0.0031744014,0.00006180952,0.000015256735,0.0005566848,0.005106084,0.000041679472,0.0000664251,0.9071794,0.06016778,0.02352971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003781192,0.00006579288,0.0048029046,0.0009528484,0.000030808726,0.0011350291,0.008863851,0.00016245335,0.00035856478,0.3025986,0.6809263,0.00006499017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009509057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008673522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005360908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009088188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07966912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163508843","doi":"10.1017/9781108348683","title":"Sanctity of Contracts in a Secular Age","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Phrase; Disadvantaged; Power (physics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024584012248432992,"score_gpt":0.242904608355766,"score_spread":0.218320596107333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163508843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021084878,0.0043628714,0.0031814876,0.005893211,0.00054293417,0.00000995264,0.000030577947,0.00004330195,0.9838271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27314943,0.013312588,0.005160194,0.01167031,0.0018888275,0.000162616,0.00015055177,0.00018344552,0.6943221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744993,0.0008711289,0.000073812516,0.00020416861,0.0011099942,0.00029093612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810946,0.00078605587,0.00022610725,0.00034283564,0.0003919311,0.00014362675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022705216,0.00047681437,0.00036974577,0.000702557,0.0026067311,0.0070556565,0.0006815234,0.0021847934,0.010818382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046406803,0.00031815574,0.00023706185,0.0012374729,0.009964985,0.004849571,0.0025081865,0.0055891275,0.003103132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018061266,0.0000035884605,0.000032492688,0.000010738439,6.242062e-7,0.000013742889,0.0004238042,0.00006573282,0.000038911512,0.9843962,0.009938568,0.005073692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057799107,0.000018206589,0.00033174842,0.00018501969,0.000003834995,0.00007776404,0.0005166043,0.0005054396,0.00017659501,0.40309405,0.5950749,0.000009993489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033316175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061706263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010818382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034989235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005091157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036191106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163736284","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab017","title":"The Fideicommissary Substitution and the Fiducia: Québécois Echoes in the Civil Code of Romania","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Civil code; Romanian; Fiduciary; Code (set theory); Substitution (logic); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017165787486584323,"score_gpt":0.290349273179765,"score_spread":0.2731834856931807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163736284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17028022,0.0062189237,0.009441462,0.057970386,0.0005320944,0.000044759327,0.00012591261,0.000060549257,0.7553257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782372,0.00041546614,0.0007151606,0.0015742247,0.000025317157,0.000009730297,0.000010156463,0.000015127544,0.01899766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942676,0.003252331,0.00015200058,0.00042410017,0.00086082745,0.0010431352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956559,0.0020381939,0.00032699763,0.0003825672,0.0012950114,0.00030134144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049414635,0.00019550779,0.000316344,0.0009226276,0.008455344,0.006024618,0.0008285077,0.0021861515,0.0041205934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009687027,0.00022828739,0.00021704844,0.0016506809,0.024164878,0.0020623421,0.002080256,0.003999575,0.00025282253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007166507,0.000002841406,0.0005881778,0.000011325342,0.0000024340645,0.00009704717,0.0046735466,0.00015938039,0.000044140397,0.987242,0.003209704,0.003962282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030472247,0.000053559525,0.014488317,0.0007666865,0.000032577136,0.00034517943,0.026791023,0.0040049264,0.00073251565,0.24794504,0.7046515,0.00015824474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7283159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7676906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2716841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03673674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023624204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5465682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163911603","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the Honour of the Crown on the Ethical Obligations of Government Lawyers: A Duty of Honourable Dealing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Duty; Obligation; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Humanities; Government (linguistics); Negotiation; Indigenous; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026089762258675642,"score_gpt":0.3156120197443843,"score_spread":0.28952225748570865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163911603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18034717,0.0028810177,0.008445173,0.089659005,0.00034507783,0.000079805955,0.000024078945,0.000021360795,0.7181972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893477,0.0003624129,0.0008778414,0.0037834875,0.00006678605,0.00001839491,0.0000032476319,0.000009412564,0.0055306205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97116166,0.013516697,0.00058189966,0.0013071685,0.007769207,0.0056634415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711936,0.01905909,0.0016992681,0.0013818332,0.0040948424,0.002571346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017841216,0.00021275402,0.0004162746,0.0012965433,0.02171608,0.015577636,0.001649618,0.007367604,0.003863745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035873868,0.00039277723,0.0003979848,0.0009764001,0.07671943,0.007668468,0.010877945,0.008368764,0.00034278407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014746986,0.000026185255,0.0014345723,0.000024740353,0.0000058922747,0.00031954172,0.045136344,0.00016205519,0.00027189316,0.94341356,0.0019515373,0.007238912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040584444,0.000057685647,0.013302909,0.000542605,0.00005237043,0.00049957517,0.11230215,0.001021148,0.0009989536,0.73197144,0.13908032,0.00013031065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23372802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28410035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23372802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024990791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0469169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46473515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164302818","doi":"","title":"Parent Fiduciary Breach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.019112377298965443,"score_gpt":0.31568495386710493,"score_spread":0.2965725765681395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164302818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11106102,0.0015107862,0.031489786,0.060008794,0.001026415,0.00022693876,0.00019820908,0.00028741066,0.79419065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8753762,0.00041794128,0.0037351518,0.011126617,0.00021235185,0.00018652066,0.00005557207,0.000063901665,0.108825624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899042,0.0038374623,0.0006724523,0.0014970608,0.0022357958,0.0018530325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98644805,0.0065946104,0.0015860238,0.002755522,0.0019206471,0.0006951845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008319373,0.0002252752,0.0003873186,0.00048059074,0.0049506794,0.0047189626,0.0013022709,0.007494284,0.014226418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040928163,0.00041605879,0.00043027994,0.0004084362,0.0045890515,0.005342146,0.0045626257,0.0063274284,0.002464071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022757378,0.000029861707,0.0039918893,0.00002909456,0.0000078355415,0.00093092286,0.01052251,0.00007530673,0.00033353813,0.94775605,0.021291604,0.015008547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048591908,0.00023687122,0.013274006,0.0008650605,0.00006456096,0.00618197,0.01934976,0.002618537,0.004008955,0.2618169,0.6914205,0.00011427459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009670618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009030489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014226418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027205714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040949634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047592044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164410430","doi":"","title":"The End of Fiduciary Accountability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Jurisprudence; Accountability; Fiduciary; Law and economics; Convention; Political science; License; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.020258800203283387,"score_gpt":0.30729702004541215,"score_spread":0.28703821984212874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164410430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01602947,0.0051974477,0.033711363,0.43441167,0.0024668376,0.0000341873,0.00012380195,0.00024621346,0.50777906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8753834,0.0023655575,0.00814981,0.06450094,0.0036509952,0.00020606724,0.000071139584,0.00028993702,0.045382094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96333706,0.017720893,0.0008743467,0.005337228,0.008052628,0.0046778047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626366,0.019711213,0.0020250962,0.007996325,0.0052027204,0.0024279887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030237636,0.00059334416,0.00093555957,0.0017060952,0.011146252,0.016880006,0.0020923147,0.010183684,0.0077689276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061008662,0.0004825907,0.0007550177,0.0010559924,0.045015674,0.01855266,0.009737516,0.019680751,0.0019599127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001036225,0.0000050729896,0.00009208596,0.0000087592725,0.0000022875918,0.000020799867,0.0007064042,0.000089246736,0.000029431516,0.9870324,0.0075143897,0.004488708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011580089,0.000012603076,0.00020182854,0.00009807731,0.0000037302937,0.000031106676,0.00038588923,0.0003245937,0.0001129088,0.92136,0.07744368,0.000013918959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075718714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004403266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030237636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009742451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011275463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15991378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164632338","doi":"","title":"Collective Best Interests in Strata Collective Sales","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Commonwealth; Political science; Duty; State (computer science); Position (finance); Law; Milestone; Public administration; Unanimity; Economics; Geography; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.01926992818591446,"score_gpt":0.3143838962324155,"score_spread":0.2951139680465011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164632338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03897624,0.001211073,0.004053263,0.014145672,0.0001296961,0.000039224735,0.00002448659,0.000020634609,0.94139963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8515628,0.0006450681,0.001390586,0.0036414424,0.00013179076,0.00006758693,0.000026669717,0.00003592285,0.1424982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930226,0.0029233156,0.00017445647,0.0007506765,0.0014163415,0.001712574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942638,0.0027840186,0.0005907715,0.000774443,0.00077705376,0.0008099237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008403631,0.00028209644,0.00047125408,0.0014809691,0.011800641,0.013841326,0.00108326,0.005791748,0.019288467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010861003,0.00049341517,0.00052487594,0.0016393018,0.023921072,0.008252125,0.009010851,0.0060639186,0.0018607121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053025005,0.00001004307,0.00050340133,0.000012443724,0.0000033575968,0.00012231382,0.007720525,0.000096106625,0.000038978622,0.98561364,0.0027171376,0.0031568247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019884244,0.000035419347,0.0032663713,0.0004719541,0.00001724536,0.00023785813,0.01834548,0.00082699495,0.00030009582,0.6098534,0.3665964,0.000028925004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02948583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06369996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02948583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011555459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00966341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083841145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164689926","doi":"","title":"The Public/Private Distinction in Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; State (computer science); Law; Dominion; Discretion; Political science; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Sociology; Liberalism; Law and economics; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.010368530643632343,"score_gpt":0.2851016186733532,"score_spread":0.27473308802972085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164689926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046035133,0.0051166015,0.0049697477,0.08667578,0.0009464237,0.00016205691,0.00018608785,0.000087148364,0.855821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8689878,0.0011141971,0.0012532171,0.04683124,0.0006318466,0.00026327508,0.000073808,0.000048765734,0.080795884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927953,0.0017360628,0.0002510621,0.0011780072,0.0019064719,0.0021331478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972404,0.0017442467,0.00022698543,0.00021091693,0.00036755443,0.00020993761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054223873,0.00051706616,0.0006136283,0.0010873429,0.013154736,0.0090809,0.0020486251,0.013505307,0.0031740977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008109667,0.00072350795,0.000572983,0.001099981,0.01675763,0.004326549,0.0038069007,0.013557863,0.00047463414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008522765,0.000005904729,0.0001629957,0.0000055719515,0.0000016632753,0.00008543846,0.001097844,0.000032400527,0.00005425669,0.9910773,0.0061737266,0.0012943896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119551725,0.00008424199,0.004010382,0.00030814967,0.000066468194,0.00035985038,0.0018091515,0.0011662123,0.0018109027,0.5470034,0.44312882,0.00013283353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19476664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2205636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19476664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018424472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012517983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38726592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164832298","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529200621.003.0011","title":"Judiciary, Administration, Elections and Miscellaneous Provisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Prime minister; Political science; Supreme court; Independence (probability theory); Neutrality; Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Judicial independence; Constitution of India; Politics","score_opus":0.056019801300788874,"score_gpt":0.327852856692009,"score_spread":0.2718330553912201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164832298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018540457,0.014360613,0.002424766,0.009743802,0.001459449,0.00004685882,0.000069399684,0.000056855715,0.96998423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14070375,0.016478734,0.004495539,0.013603325,0.0047473614,0.0003506059,0.00014751962,0.00014072796,0.8193324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746525,0.00094858493,0.00011875481,0.00027984072,0.0007875498,0.0003999697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990338,0.00054558204,0.00008714275,0.000116403215,0.00014060712,0.000076420234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019934191,0.00050404546,0.00037151665,0.001149795,0.006671904,0.008046076,0.001136837,0.0026620987,0.01096496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031521628,0.0004526611,0.00027377336,0.0019817227,0.011031062,0.0024007256,0.001794236,0.004847162,0.0049663265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025745874,0.000011466243,0.000042587882,0.000020833872,7.403442e-7,0.000024119983,0.00056301075,0.000076070915,0.00004696674,0.9716537,0.019959325,0.007598616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052642167,0.000012828656,0.00044594804,0.0001292806,0.000002581375,0.00004094113,0.00046623324,0.00008911164,0.000107445194,0.13446017,0.8642313,0.000008999802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01778503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032458242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01778503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00651166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007068646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04724562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167424012","doi":"10.1017/9781780686288.012","title":"Should Indigenous Property be Relationship Property?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Intersentia eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Political science; Legislature; Geography; Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Law; Archaeology; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.13432663516763033,"score_gpt":0.3301311702345714,"score_spread":0.19580453506694107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167424012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05190063,0.01169191,0.0021088484,0.44048405,0.0034748646,0.000029630562,0.00012376635,0.000050355957,0.49013594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84629697,0.006486067,0.0010384666,0.07907912,0.002822818,0.00004139077,0.000082613115,0.00008501149,0.06406763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697936,0.00079432724,0.00010149804,0.0005992215,0.0006224821,0.0009031492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967487,0.0012424075,0.0002524224,0.00039992732,0.00073173037,0.0006249249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037951733,0.00019846653,0.0004798577,0.00048589677,0.009676524,0.0077191954,0.0017809524,0.0086406935,0.011539098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009434301,0.00025425068,0.0002962558,0.00066892704,0.038968924,0.017885856,0.0033564526,0.00936135,0.0016193042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012448237,0.000021585538,0.0009629083,0.000078701996,0.0000040939835,0.0004744288,0.033499587,0.000018192854,0.00012220636,0.932103,0.022638569,0.010064277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008776371,0.000030124289,0.005752799,0.00063886313,0.00001401289,0.0008021366,0.08126077,0.00010493102,0.00027421926,0.2724763,0.6385919,0.0000451583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05249823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055638645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05249823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056213825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006157645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10438532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168310726","doi":"","title":"Equitable Subordination Redux? Section 183 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and Respecting the ‘Legislative Will’ of Parliament”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Equity (law); Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0960582412383128,"score_gpt":0.3509504751165748,"score_spread":0.254892233878262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168310726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026063588,0.0044305497,0.005033597,0.061161097,0.0006910851,0.00006137239,0.000100418074,0.000080850485,0.90237755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7335033,0.002318235,0.0034951637,0.026154285,0.00044883045,0.00004999782,0.00007357745,0.000044847813,0.23391187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973483,0.00032480364,0.00007111253,0.0002799443,0.001094448,0.0008814196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994875,0.00010627916,0.000055442888,0.00005740744,0.0002177764,0.00007557646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002002587,0.0002417299,0.00021848692,0.00042520167,0.0046692183,0.004665357,0.0009941695,0.0037781047,0.0057316106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002749367,0.0003565863,0.00025893498,0.0005955254,0.01020823,0.0016565339,0.0016206693,0.003110383,0.0011669358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005414145,0.00000936255,0.00035088914,0.00001385729,0.0000019594993,0.000109022745,0.0022931527,0.000111648595,0.00026711097,0.96115685,0.024718935,0.0109617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019194747,0.000029913781,0.0052753654,0.00017466878,0.000015722753,0.00027986703,0.0029424943,0.00073012797,0.001167272,0.20521565,0.7841042,0.000045503537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60017145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6794528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60017145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017136538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03259694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80436647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169546670","doi":"10.1515/ldr-2021-0046","title":"The Courts and Corporate Executive Compensation in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Development Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Executive compensation; Corporate governance; Corporation; Entitlement (fair division); Corporate law; Bankruptcy; Variety (cybernetics); Corporate title; Law; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Business; Political science; Economics; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.04795818311009499,"score_gpt":0.28162581689084826,"score_spread":0.23366763378075328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169546670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7430051,0.009559312,0.0003577203,0.039759338,0.00024892308,0.00008474183,0.0027294564,0.000044256558,0.2042111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97799003,0.001646084,0.00014518823,0.001791591,0.000037439786,0.0000070887922,0.00032982897,0.000009277121,0.01804349],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370414,0.0002926452,0.0001805984,0.00034546663,0.0027376942,0.0027394192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740018,0.00345574,0.0034233856,0.00031145022,0.0152863925,0.0035212897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018145813,0.00016625487,0.00031424107,0.004905103,0.010447655,0.0062151807,0.0013348979,0.0015835298,0.00948419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014606292,0.00029474797,0.00037476793,0.00708036,0.0040159156,0.0012485922,0.0018045092,0.0026635157,0.00036011785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015357115,0.00018087892,0.6068824,0.00033812554,0.000116182346,0.0023732083,0.03617626,0.0017971839,0.00083524187,0.20249528,0.07119569,0.07745594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002040416,0.00003372468,0.7688344,0.00056912785,0.00006954071,0.00026297927,0.03289687,0.0011685378,0.00051726564,0.0044000084,0.19109546,0.00013161717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99888307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19276011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19276011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17763938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9362838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170143620","doi":"10.1108/pm-12-2019-0071","title":"On the Property Management Services Ordinance of Hong Kong: concerns and implications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Property Management","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property management; Legislation; Business; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Originality; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Property law; Corporate governance; Common law; Law and economics; Freedom of contract; Property rights; Public administration; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance; Real estate","score_opus":0.04207880207837401,"score_gpt":0.2974578321464861,"score_spread":0.2553790300681121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170143620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5844539,0.13441844,0.004941613,0.11158958,0.002345014,0.0004266751,0.0008232186,0.00008371842,0.16091788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320061,0.035786074,0.002657466,0.017838802,0.00023777803,0.0001109675,0.00023418186,0.000016373015,0.01111217],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482673,0.0019175757,0.00067696476,0.00044739494,0.0015353147,0.0005959929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97690874,0.012890854,0.0033503536,0.0007980134,0.0051392494,0.0009128038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012048584,0.00017020397,0.00025737254,0.0010486295,0.0020586506,0.004460079,0.0009926354,0.0012061042,0.0018836359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014804945,0.00022192766,0.00038930203,0.0017948578,0.0046898685,0.0020178373,0.0012503898,0.00156599,0.00015104194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020324031,0.00027122663,0.17933908,0.011938389,0.00028675777,0.009992439,0.06508563,0.0048861434,0.0036419595,0.30818844,0.06077141,0.35539523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028886363,0.00029276958,0.24812661,0.007434902,0.00024164007,0.0013411352,0.08880408,0.00088677445,0.0019263749,0.009979682,0.6407658,0.00017136759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33856004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21742488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33856004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010313229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033153262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6731788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170318723","doi":"","title":"Submission to the Ministry of Justice on Judicial Review: Proposals for Reform – ‘Prospective Invalidation/Overruling’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Political science; Presumption; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Statutory law; Constitution; Common law; Judicial restraint; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.025934942147818975,"score_gpt":0.36207636233310464,"score_spread":0.33614142018528564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170318723","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012797512,0.003954606,0.001890923,0.9452985,0.029298993,0.0003653461,0.00017725036,0.00026003303,0.017474622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017842142,0.002610082,0.0057627447,0.8901722,0.03076295,0.0004473917,0.00021729381,0.00027618156,0.05190904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8717311,0.02597108,0.014561024,0.011134106,0.053601097,0.023001552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86739767,0.041087274,0.011274272,0.013185755,0.045007043,0.02204801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09495007,0.0014392156,0.0027920909,0.0028620292,0.01089039,0.036332265,0.012807184,0.08178501,0.008984376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17969438,0.002177274,0.0033542342,0.0028591864,0.01742089,0.012278091,0.011442176,0.041383594,0.008812263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058017038,0.000121072044,0.0003686576,0.00027504427,0.0000376049,0.00033896483,0.0008361345,0.0001623865,0.00068109593,0.09945848,0.88211775,0.015544819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117373726,0.00011432153,0.0013754334,0.00044070906,0.000039480256,0.00015914519,0.00037659873,0.0005369274,0.0004624105,0.019651992,0.9765627,0.00016293008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028601479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05097457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09495007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028343087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09644311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50214994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170981047","doi":"10.31009/leap.2020.v8.03","title":"Egalitarianism, Inheritance, and Taxation: On Daniel Halliday’s The Inheritance of Wealth","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Ethics and Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Egalitarianism; Inheritance tax; Economics; Political science; Law; Public economics; Genetics; Biology; International taxation","score_opus":0.08498001117855247,"score_gpt":0.351729106970193,"score_spread":0.2667490957916405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170981047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049869556,0.027861975,0.021251353,0.25419268,0.0016196298,0.00005328311,0.00015628999,0.000044902874,0.64495033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8912414,0.0077375905,0.0042076297,0.02359297,0.00088230195,0.000056774155,0.000026896769,0.000050518232,0.072203934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880683,0.00053158164,0.000029261846,0.00016493816,0.00030010974,0.00016714456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911445,0.00056596467,0.000066121225,0.00007735259,0.0001086348,0.000067553054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019642771,0.00023716268,0.00031159105,0.0008726299,0.004041289,0.0042409063,0.0008801377,0.002625305,0.0026387675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027084025,0.00016180819,0.00025766913,0.0007644938,0.024701135,0.0059873466,0.0031675927,0.0040873727,0.0002970814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034009736,0.0000021569058,0.000042570897,0.000005300437,5.018575e-7,0.00001711325,0.0006646206,0.00004738785,0.000012179447,0.99507695,0.0028450137,0.001282909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006391188,0.000004948874,0.00019542038,0.00007024802,0.0000018209256,0.00004165977,0.00078606774,0.00015838881,0.00010169747,0.9012528,0.09737201,0.0000084725225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017695863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022160767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017695863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007337827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028867316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053239882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171380287","doi":"","title":"Pierringer Settlement Agreements: Proceeding with Eyes Wide Open","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Settlement (finance); Settling; Human settlement; Liability; Compensation (psychology); Law; Business; Joint and several liability; Law and economics; Legal liability; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Finance; Psychology; Payment; Social psychology; Waste management; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.06510914411240587,"score_gpt":0.35793885905732664,"score_spread":0.29282971494492077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171380287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025892088,0.0008848125,0.04533438,0.010928357,0.00089939527,0.0005016608,0.00026810696,0.0005556021,0.93803835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14107147,0.002095439,0.04693144,0.020527288,0.0010058361,0.0011882895,0.0005626389,0.0007569875,0.78586066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9548712,0.0077857412,0.001958533,0.004390084,0.026015982,0.004978545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786511,0.006795147,0.0010053064,0.00500816,0.0074497648,0.0010905283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019786544,0.0007219844,0.00069954013,0.002023088,0.010274123,0.012701899,0.0036525596,0.0133509,0.059997316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063746005,0.0011703778,0.0015763876,0.0019591239,0.008628269,0.009984465,0.010637892,0.010994489,0.021557083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001615872,0.000022025206,0.00020103573,0.000061425744,0.00000972653,0.00018430244,0.0011357995,0.00012701555,0.00027841554,0.87999576,0.0919777,0.02599061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002611496,0.000026195275,0.00043866425,0.00018843141,0.00001982164,0.000334817,0.0005040383,0.0004183808,0.0006211161,0.15819634,0.8391736,0.00005243186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07603167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099619746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07603167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068099983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035596695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20071101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172131107","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Agency Denied","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Agency (philosophy); Contradiction; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Denial; Business; Accounting; Duty; Economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01563847160414158,"score_gpt":0.3057790840919395,"score_spread":0.29014061248779793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172131107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019264014,0.0017858574,0.03489011,0.030043684,0.0009052616,0.000102080936,0.00022044625,0.00014442872,0.91264415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86813796,0.0011083396,0.008295023,0.019115405,0.0013482294,0.00032859555,0.00014290953,0.000105035455,0.10141843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801074,0.004383231,0.0011581678,0.0051201545,0.006449597,0.0027813755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914786,0.0028877961,0.00066988653,0.0022509007,0.002175438,0.00053732446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009127004,0.0005200935,0.0011121973,0.0011360856,0.0051302644,0.008422307,0.0020352178,0.0098891845,0.008870759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023422137,0.00060259097,0.0011654227,0.00095524895,0.0236938,0.008255572,0.0062539326,0.01391557,0.0021772948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003274586,0.0000025182921,0.00004534896,0.000004765644,0.0000018454133,0.000018857298,0.00019161614,0.000026240483,0.000032310254,0.9978682,0.0010260391,0.0007789943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029056851,0.000024719542,0.00021119491,0.000080189,0.000017443615,0.00018006942,0.00025615806,0.000526448,0.0002997833,0.8930021,0.105350904,0.000021992286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008908672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004912832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098891845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006323017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075815558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048268795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173707194","doi":"","title":"The Devil Is in the Scale: Revisiting the Commonality Requirement in Charter Class Actions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Charter; Normative; Law and economics; Narrative; Redress; Complementarity (molecular biology); Class (philosophy); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03207756010764312,"score_gpt":0.3388460098549466,"score_spread":0.3067684497473035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173707194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18186834,0.004252733,0.23456712,0.10512581,0.0010068557,0.00049572624,0.00013588976,0.00031698242,0.4722305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599147,0.0006371542,0.021959983,0.0061849616,0.00032086592,0.00033946123,0.000032023294,0.00009709074,0.010513778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95262206,0.023551647,0.0018605267,0.006661913,0.011941396,0.0033624438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9392142,0.038490355,0.0039874287,0.011385602,0.005524733,0.001397603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038305614,0.0005794698,0.0010917037,0.0027122367,0.009584443,0.014607246,0.0043239775,0.010222598,0.003229427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08032844,0.0007027381,0.0013790578,0.0014155128,0.06910549,0.019976974,0.014570176,0.015204392,0.0005571967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044829226,0.000005865649,0.00015425414,0.00000967977,0.0000025541244,0.000057205034,0.001961719,0.00022919578,0.00005086999,0.99486613,0.00045594547,0.0022022394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015265614,0.000037179077,0.0005430826,0.00014514654,0.000014030949,0.00007400144,0.002057495,0.0010398858,0.0003054474,0.9714745,0.024262015,0.000031830747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010940894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009333545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038305614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010421037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012669565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20258182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174196727","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: McCain v McCain and Barton v Sauvé : A New Approach to Autonomous Domestic Contractual Bargaining in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.04931912024446239,"score_gpt":0.2837559971035994,"score_spread":0.234436876859137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174196727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053274598,0.001234255,0.0007979939,0.8256829,0.0023052897,0.00016926808,0.0003802504,0.000060408816,0.116095066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24618182,0.0014679012,0.000777918,0.59177023,0.0017287378,0.00019742514,0.00008309479,0.00008102559,0.15771179],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995017,0.0004702496,0.00022359946,0.0006576581,0.0013727611,0.0022587422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923638,0.00330683,0.00053029304,0.0002728559,0.0014471174,0.002078969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003025908,0.00043662565,0.00066144275,0.00084207125,0.03421084,0.0062231496,0.004190044,0.04453902,0.014674792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012099257,0.0013168369,0.001094532,0.0020667522,0.011721616,0.0029692026,0.003342343,0.031462867,0.0011317072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021635757,0.00006813904,0.008183543,0.0001626356,0.000068464076,0.008509761,0.048655894,0.0004038855,0.0009426528,0.25017545,0.67570376,0.00690939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021614309,0.000055311393,0.016224476,0.0003581921,0.00017690498,0.0026749163,0.046460412,0.0008543743,0.00078829215,0.019069947,0.9128236,0.00029737083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9720943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99014646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0726572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0726572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11226981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5271673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174920526","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab010","title":"Accountability for authority","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Opportunism; Law and economics; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.06286507752607251,"score_gpt":0.3967887501159921,"score_spread":0.33392367258991956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174920526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0148312505,0.0046538734,0.13165009,0.12802668,0.0021272744,0.00019306323,0.00027216648,0.00023288536,0.71801275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91408145,0.0020708714,0.014869804,0.013437625,0.0015699038,0.00035945655,0.00011824082,0.0001191274,0.05337345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709871,0.013466216,0.0017495267,0.0039825137,0.0066436245,0.003170973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96428484,0.01671945,0.0036804776,0.00595322,0.0074729566,0.0018889529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019010969,0.0005285947,0.0008970761,0.0015412683,0.006497408,0.011094985,0.0013297633,0.006830693,0.012529713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045975536,0.00044837478,0.0009933913,0.0011092579,0.03312155,0.0148045,0.006154476,0.008727524,0.0020330853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020011332,0.000001930506,0.000055571592,0.000011017418,0.0000018822175,0.0000132626,0.00025482752,0.00006719393,0.000021236832,0.99681866,0.0017303682,0.0010220795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000916332,0.000011704137,0.00018175352,0.00010591464,0.0000066826187,0.000057261197,0.00022431924,0.0003844062,0.00011268331,0.9475089,0.051383995,0.000013260653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008964766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045265085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019010969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009340787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011477623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10054088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174943767","doi":"","title":"Review of Principles of Property Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Property (philosophy); Law; Property law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Property rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0311844596031011,"score_gpt":0.31873781172057414,"score_spread":0.287553352117473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174943767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016330145,0.94358814,0.001534356,0.01279398,0.0069751404,0.0000191844,0.00015302161,0.00003378775,0.034739044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043042423,0.96089524,0.0017246658,0.0077274293,0.006584605,0.000051252424,0.00037227332,0.000051063955,0.018289255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996709,0.00062636903,0.00022845787,0.00028996464,0.0019886554,0.00015756942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398005,0.0025483014,0.00038891472,0.00026679496,0.002627812,0.00018824595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025946493,0.00073506485,0.00092263846,0.0075085554,0.0009410783,0.003428338,0.0013738705,0.0021906944,0.0109311445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011899869,0.00044213166,0.0006440943,0.009127716,0.0028612413,0.004888571,0.0012573531,0.0032103152,0.0072673555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014258712,0.000021497208,0.00016281409,0.0035055666,0.000030192086,0.00006556994,0.00016232308,0.00041123878,0.0001378972,0.08426151,0.6631934,0.24803382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015347797,0.0000066154334,0.00027032598,0.0016901909,0.0000048164716,0.00007367262,0.000045431778,0.00004055696,0.000028224676,0.010615973,0.9872168,0.0000058621176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062142503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007538995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0109311445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042703445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068414058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036568284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176038780","doi":"","title":"Inadequate Reasons: The Need for Tribunal Participation in Judicial Review Litigation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Duty; Political science; Law; Tribunal; Officer; Statutory law; Administrative court; Obligation; High Court","score_opus":0.027729717854668923,"score_gpt":0.35588726995215386,"score_spread":0.32815755209748493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176038780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072234645,0.011622354,0.026013838,0.58110046,0.0032125001,0.00084274856,0.0001261229,0.00032327007,0.30452403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8188895,0.0031047778,0.011736264,0.13719565,0.0028841568,0.00092559744,0.00010707193,0.00025097068,0.024906006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.71894306,0.12203182,0.018050311,0.021543691,0.081089884,0.03834119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54195225,0.31598118,0.021588136,0.024368111,0.06333678,0.032773588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2503185,0.0005529233,0.0020541823,0.0072225435,0.02985791,0.0462241,0.009836848,0.045385312,0.009798558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4292132,0.0020042479,0.0020737485,0.004345985,0.030427702,0.021723863,0.020158067,0.029618284,0.001638661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060568353,0.000100686455,0.0054204552,0.00026069622,0.000055880504,0.0016655092,0.022677043,0.00041228626,0.00043029155,0.86891836,0.060229465,0.03976873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003197973,0.00014349875,0.010084961,0.0031676851,0.00017136546,0.0016435033,0.026131745,0.003849286,0.0007546713,0.57059896,0.38272533,0.00040918382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1162962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24976526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2503185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043275904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14602098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92449075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176229594","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12648","title":"Citizenship Stripping, Fair Procedures, and the Separation of Powers: A Critical Comment on <i>Damache</i> v <i>Minister for Justice</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Casey House","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Separation of powers; Citizenship; Irish; Judgement; Constitution; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06491810052361464,"score_gpt":0.40136967097037346,"score_spread":0.33645157044675883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176229594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002798736,0.008166175,0.0008073418,0.9422425,0.0048043425,0.00005759087,0.000101198,0.000025530993,0.04099651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07474101,0.0047786403,0.0009312882,0.8803032,0.008499554,0.00017174048,0.000036560465,0.0000670333,0.030471051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741078,0.010105531,0.0010436829,0.0041742544,0.006732723,0.003836027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962256,0.030815147,0.0009451677,0.0008397256,0.0041162297,0.0010276667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03622377,0.000704601,0.001541104,0.001710226,0.014750032,0.014964366,0.0066127297,0.051480297,0.0042086397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043167695,0.0010293111,0.001920619,0.001943051,0.038554348,0.008557161,0.004202535,0.053380266,0.0010512092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003470853,0.000020748032,0.00015587508,0.0001374992,0.0000114632785,0.00041018025,0.007542517,0.00015202006,0.000105661034,0.6051331,0.38312924,0.0031670136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008844433,0.000056157016,0.00088887126,0.0012297556,0.000046690748,0.00016496652,0.010020202,0.00039811851,0.0005339744,0.1249686,0.8614329,0.000171252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24623457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2835407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24623457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032701213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035137516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48960263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177758299","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3689849","title":"Weaponizing Lex loci: The Banking and Finance Laws of Delaware and South Dakota","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economics; Business; Financial system","score_opus":0.02128230016601909,"score_gpt":0.2666973031940293,"score_spread":0.2454150030280102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177758299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5665759,0.0017620545,0.0011284787,0.028339138,0.00022320739,0.00021755627,0.0025601313,0.00009367929,0.39909986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9088395,0.00088475563,0.0009362995,0.008581408,0.00006184272,0.00015948436,0.0006196,0.00003090537,0.07988617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981816,0.00017704183,0.00011310672,0.00029704344,0.00063288334,0.0005982974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617624,0.0018043073,0.00057861605,0.00027205216,0.0006746162,0.0004941238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015386671,0.0002377504,0.000332945,0.0015733952,0.0047274916,0.0075354497,0.0013623455,0.002471981,0.0077846856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005533535,0.0005632779,0.00027757647,0.0016052267,0.0027222058,0.0014586943,0.002927681,0.0033309117,0.00074833847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019207381,0.00018838786,0.12526955,0.00014352884,0.00011176396,0.0014221708,0.012604319,0.0014597372,0.0038404928,0.74911094,0.067573726,0.03808326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017545416,0.00017254564,0.407347,0.000769836,0.00040621555,0.0006411759,0.031756543,0.0030505313,0.0051670694,0.061456256,0.48883414,0.0002232125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60870975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8579932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60870975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012791819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025119215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78718925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181813453","doi":"10.1515/ercl-2021-2013","title":"The Arguments in <i>Justice in Transactions</i>: A Reply to Commentators","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Contract Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive property; Law; Relation (database); Sociology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0219109574584339,"score_gpt":0.3389429854665116,"score_spread":0.31703202800807767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181813453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003201662,0.00072346424,0.00031404133,0.9931029,0.0040230886,0.000005402689,0.000023650246,0.000011133721,0.001476097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024145028,0.002194459,0.0007171309,0.94778776,0.018591411,0.000095141186,0.000035002224,0.00017459267,0.0062594176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95146734,0.027654408,0.0026885536,0.0047305822,0.009952327,0.0035067657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8035106,0.16399835,0.0050821677,0.0039347713,0.02060568,0.0028683976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05463736,0.001315733,0.0022085833,0.002280031,0.012235821,0.016743895,0.008895403,0.06314082,0.008631046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1486846,0.0012833585,0.0028805838,0.004454971,0.036809225,0.026697434,0.010822802,0.07807369,0.0030964261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036819074,0.00001602738,0.00021243734,0.00020600013,0.000017367434,0.00032916706,0.011347386,0.000191226,0.00012076712,0.1502949,0.8343147,0.0029132592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004778653,0.000031543124,0.00062198815,0.0012167443,0.00003204154,0.00027354003,0.016023343,0.0007167323,0.00046550875,0.11375971,0.86662954,0.00018147782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019430432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010612833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06314082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01906181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011654208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28895342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184000415","doi":"","title":"The Scope of Canadian Defamation Injunctions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Harm; Law; Scope (computer science); Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.024077274636678338,"score_gpt":0.2819323039551331,"score_spread":0.2578550293184547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184000415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.259596,0.012960204,0.0055105635,0.01992674,0.00022761618,0.00013350949,0.0009792512,0.00011928209,0.7005469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95458484,0.0036002137,0.0014210938,0.0023089496,0.000048868435,0.00004219284,0.00020716633,0.000036815505,0.037749868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98014003,0.0014587428,0.0006435704,0.0018817536,0.011288143,0.004587777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857722,0.0045284317,0.0012474743,0.0011843572,0.0062764147,0.0009911513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065352484,0.00036748318,0.0004157862,0.004154661,0.012234716,0.007832195,0.0014262837,0.0020318523,0.007891536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017772922,0.00051446084,0.00062416686,0.003307582,0.0078610005,0.0024073918,0.0038849027,0.003163094,0.00061355083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105896266,0.000028948829,0.025133006,0.00033818366,0.00004803605,0.0008635917,0.030572757,0.0008078499,0.005663251,0.8269516,0.014698793,0.09478806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003397493,0.00007300799,0.14695603,0.0010163515,0.00023161192,0.0010094823,0.023559028,0.0009926885,0.0060358075,0.051952854,0.76783216,0.00030694527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91227114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94634455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08772886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060835697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06681813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44139594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184429340","doi":"","title":"Common-Sense Causation: How a Robust and Pragmatic Application of the 'But For' Test Can Solve the Circular Causation Problem in Cases of Multiple Contributing Tortfeasors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Tort; Test (biology); Liability; Plaintiff; Compensation (psychology); Computer science; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Political science; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.016640944452430546,"score_gpt":0.2708454016434107,"score_spread":0.25420445719098017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184429340","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049594495,0.0012553135,0.5884895,0.15871905,0.0016324174,0.00093415973,0.00018926902,0.00088766456,0.19829814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7974599,0.00030013954,0.17868778,0.011701572,0.00036224222,0.00046037135,0.00006861144,0.00019918013,0.010760288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96023583,0.024383571,0.0021489856,0.004810553,0.0057758964,0.0026450465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90275335,0.07721348,0.0046537807,0.008170487,0.0059909304,0.0012180312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061139435,0.001163756,0.0018755605,0.0034127173,0.007458108,0.010965517,0.0055486774,0.013009912,0.0072027096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16116263,0.0008843084,0.0021540585,0.0020715452,0.043064814,0.017554369,0.010001023,0.009511294,0.0009018768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018531216,0.0000220989,0.0008638696,0.000047493057,0.000030534517,0.0004539229,0.002330246,0.0011830095,0.00016013888,0.98012674,0.003340721,0.011422714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042145013,0.0000376017,0.00066362653,0.00010291519,0.000050422797,0.00021405186,0.0013069882,0.007760127,0.0004487535,0.9747952,0.014505219,0.00007296603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03288857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030318476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061139435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008214346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014653166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32334012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184641484","doi":"10.4337/9781783479689.00021","title":"Good faith as a core principle","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Discretion; Law; Faith; Norm (philosophy); Paragraph; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050171248624711055,"score_gpt":0.31250178795765615,"score_spread":0.2623305393329451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184641484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030221033,0.0036313343,0.01183062,0.007929749,0.00025725385,0.000042655243,0.00003746337,0.000037968184,0.97321093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6438198,0.0055919117,0.014819262,0.007447266,0.0007030742,0.00019879137,0.00010159857,0.00015693122,0.3271613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972228,0.00090912136,0.000070634946,0.0002450442,0.0010935675,0.00045888624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842775,0.0006250023,0.00007876278,0.00024314868,0.00044237153,0.00018295649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024705355,0.0004209019,0.00040307982,0.00096238486,0.004099265,0.0066474667,0.0010636527,0.0025066494,0.005259111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00315069,0.000293055,0.00034950807,0.0008837836,0.027854081,0.0036359227,0.0031572073,0.0046448475,0.0015178084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8787435e-7,0.0000016440476,0.000012778452,0.0000070427927,3.162076e-7,0.000005873126,0.0004015985,0.000027383292,0.000016685677,0.9958769,0.0017358952,0.001913298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027874594,0.000008045576,0.00018620495,0.00009885064,0.0000024216758,0.00005309599,0.0005704831,0.00024097193,0.00015932787,0.84419644,0.15447523,0.000006077326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025429469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0261103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025429469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008718058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008863866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06325424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186640333","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3685","title":"Sanctity of Contracts in a Secular Age: Equity, Fairness and Enrichment by Stephen Waddams","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Law; Intergenerational equity; Business; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Sustainability","score_opus":0.02688828411787783,"score_gpt":0.33894541351035423,"score_spread":0.31205712939247643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186640333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05650942,0.041148134,0.011895759,0.39338344,0.002951934,0.00004381541,0.0000412896,0.000033384607,0.4939929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8811681,0.010647146,0.0038705685,0.035902902,0.0017159311,0.000066203815,0.000015448491,0.000031907093,0.06658174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971148,0.0017062386,0.000065814995,0.00019245344,0.00063231756,0.00028829995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961468,0.0024592106,0.0003337639,0.00020236218,0.00053910166,0.0003187444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005511524,0.0001861221,0.00029628715,0.00044826986,0.004513611,0.004640839,0.00049947575,0.002178133,0.002352031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009389108,0.00018417103,0.0001946631,0.000553516,0.014518601,0.0044095544,0.0026262065,0.0054867216,0.00043600256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052896517,0.000009966074,0.00016660479,0.000007794521,0.0000014889189,0.000033144137,0.0014209688,0.0001506796,0.000026434944,0.9850686,0.0080461,0.005062947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007643435,0.000015083988,0.00061288296,0.00016361909,0.0000036446343,0.000063451414,0.0015165701,0.0007263559,0.00008636143,0.87408286,0.12270784,0.000013587174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065092044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009529463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065092044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033104334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033190693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029148042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187821050","doi":"","title":"THE OPPRESSION REMEDY:: CLARIFYING PART II OF THE BCE TEST","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Plaintiff; Law; CLARITY; Corporation; Political science; Statutory law; Harm; Statute; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.057691719167339464,"score_gpt":0.3375791675816374,"score_spread":0.27988744841429797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187821050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05095286,0.002831694,0.1164731,0.14112173,0.004034481,0.0013723176,0.0009600816,0.00037756655,0.6818763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7339212,0.0016978757,0.0959828,0.09278459,0.0028372607,0.0019852875,0.0005437691,0.0002519801,0.069995314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721929,0.007127374,0.0023965894,0.00349945,0.011687159,0.0030965467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965841,0.02257103,0.0018012414,0.0033041113,0.0055889944,0.0008936397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023819236,0.00089882227,0.0018745806,0.0023504794,0.0041085263,0.008737893,0.0037993074,0.019999558,0.009333249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06124728,0.00067326304,0.001530479,0.0010623717,0.018883208,0.012389851,0.008175083,0.017333526,0.0034579113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043990818,0.000045115357,0.0010193125,0.00006745615,0.0000089669265,0.00041342914,0.0007006648,0.00035491292,0.0007247739,0.9746174,0.010052558,0.01195148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019943711,0.0003153962,0.0043717967,0.0009752756,0.00007526552,0.0017124498,0.0014318312,0.005039832,0.0062640808,0.71220845,0.26714933,0.00025682128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009053343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008133263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99094665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004570188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01428715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12596965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189544604","doi":"","title":"'State Succession to State Contracts: A New Framework of Analysis for an Unexplored Question'","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Ecological succession; State (computer science); Unification; Nexus (standard); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02361469976864647,"score_gpt":0.3702850698591559,"score_spread":0.3466703700905094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189544604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03709368,0.007399847,0.5741081,0.06776992,0.0008420861,0.00015653408,0.00015376782,0.000120255885,0.31235573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8785374,0.004131558,0.09184644,0.0031849935,0.0010955925,0.00041608437,0.00010104749,0.000110993984,0.020575913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956709,0.0027118009,0.00010382664,0.00037747796,0.0006160029,0.00051989674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961104,0.0025316565,0.0003242675,0.0004269189,0.00035964805,0.0002470664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008191058,0.0005864942,0.0010513619,0.002509264,0.006004088,0.008271172,0.0026660997,0.004583185,0.008077851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008126161,0.00042514797,0.0011975886,0.0022230854,0.027967086,0.017379263,0.0050373254,0.0066377167,0.00060029945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.735323e-7,0.000001950147,0.000021721471,0.0000033860836,4.521215e-7,0.000009093695,0.00014628719,0.0001206802,0.0000053737353,0.9991079,0.00016539826,0.00041690533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033786255,0.000005662306,0.00006213085,0.00002098874,0.0000013338514,0.000026319954,0.00029135466,0.0020662455,0.000024065776,0.9897278,0.00776698,0.0000037654968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033304207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024731113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008271172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057385275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004615391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043318987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189853077","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-74878-4_7","title":"Epilogue: Law at the Limits of Imagination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Romance; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Phenomenon; Law; Law and literature; State (computer science); Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05695844005575391,"score_gpt":0.32915381950067324,"score_spread":0.27219537944491934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189853077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027616977,0.025440065,0.003018867,0.043864585,0.019236758,0.000042010317,0.00029249623,0.00020082678,0.9076282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067964257,0.009277731,0.0010055861,0.017193144,0.010187538,0.00006831496,0.000170418,0.00027350415,0.9550273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995982,0.00013645786,0.000011473849,0.000048179176,0.0001732023,0.00003244808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988979,0.0006845096,0.000026474112,0.00006356869,0.00026050088,0.000067042296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054809486,0.0005924067,0.0004510975,0.0014858383,0.0019019862,0.005500083,0.0009472702,0.0029884058,0.113262765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026995186,0.0002608387,0.00027559398,0.0011680946,0.0029772143,0.0070544635,0.0014495779,0.004873706,0.030437833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006329303,0.000007388874,0.00001471203,0.000067813075,9.0181175e-7,0.000023390066,0.0001972251,0.000045819466,0.00005633446,0.20670867,0.77557766,0.017293729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018568925,0.0000039069273,0.00003289541,0.00009875821,7.917083e-7,0.00004031064,0.00011452799,0.00006181416,0.000043468346,0.041315787,0.95828265,0.0000031355282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049719363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010200019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113262765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002090563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016909546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37890172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191900753","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3645236","title":"Bringing Rule of Law and Fairness to the Dysfunctional World of Sovereign Debt: A Role for Canada?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dysfunctional family; Sovereignty; Sovereign debt; Debt; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Medicine; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.0071896550465139685,"score_gpt":0.24588018840250628,"score_spread":0.2386905333559923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191900753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03936734,0.006811455,0.006568125,0.6778427,0.0015708422,0.000051792187,0.00027063236,0.0000775554,0.2674395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9060465,0.0035100807,0.0031556399,0.05527915,0.0007941506,0.000052820997,0.000069536385,0.00008893577,0.031003203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990655,0.0019734092,0.00023436871,0.0011615821,0.0021671355,0.0038084213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97847944,0.0065966467,0.001379746,0.0015169726,0.007840027,0.004187181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010465431,0.0004012398,0.001473099,0.001696064,0.018634262,0.021197887,0.0033416108,0.014162436,0.013980943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041491553,0.00040829062,0.0006668456,0.003031172,0.03547837,0.013540396,0.005024622,0.01646406,0.000701144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019346271,0.0000113758415,0.0007728508,0.000025019706,0.000010757117,0.00005111648,0.0014492343,0.00022909386,0.000022767212,0.9786789,0.013656629,0.0050729625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005150829,0.000011914481,0.0017449576,0.0002588443,0.000035017034,0.000051225197,0.004239012,0.0009942777,0.000117816424,0.89899695,0.09342382,0.00007474989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9293941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92147774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070605874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054405596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19599749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39474213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192239643","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3731215","title":"Benefit Corporations: A Persisting and Heightened Conflict for Directors","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology; Accounting; Political science","score_opus":0.023431165752189963,"score_gpt":0.29298704754559346,"score_spread":0.2695558817934035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192239643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21450405,0.003160388,0.006001983,0.57971656,0.0010365098,0.000033433997,0.00005408191,0.000055680644,0.19543728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9423276,0.00037049525,0.0008367808,0.043174125,0.00041183826,0.000027202384,0.000012908758,0.000017761042,0.012821288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98638225,0.005721798,0.00031092178,0.001429842,0.0035143078,0.002640963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97443265,0.01024664,0.002797638,0.0020759592,0.0033517338,0.00709539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012784926,0.0002800171,0.0005353094,0.0013319713,0.011513396,0.018793076,0.001294828,0.017073717,0.0060973396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03156565,0.00037771804,0.00040620816,0.00094552856,0.015430586,0.008810109,0.0101330895,0.01207024,0.00085880974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004769178,0.000100845136,0.008801844,0.000040140403,0.00003164333,0.0004722189,0.013320391,0.00021382944,0.0009608534,0.8910637,0.05922444,0.025722414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006924143,0.00013096741,0.015157939,0.00026515248,0.000055984616,0.00075186713,0.037790522,0.0010890189,0.00095193955,0.5674442,0.3761954,0.00009779332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036752142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070538726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018793076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004646682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009176279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06761396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192479219","doi":"","title":"Le Manquement À La Norme De Diligence Et La Faute Dans Le Cadre Du Délit De Négligence (Common Law) Et De La Responsabilité Extracontractuelle Du Fait Personnel (Droit Civil) AU Canada: Une Étude Comparée (Breach of Standard of Care and Fault in the Common Law Tort of Negligence and Its Quebec Civil Law Equivalent, Fault of Extra Contractual Liability for Personal Acts: A Canadian Comparative Study)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal liability; Common law; Political science; Humanities; Due diligence; Diligence; Liability; Philosophy; Commercial law; Theology","score_opus":0.019070876654874634,"score_gpt":0.32669075708177214,"score_spread":0.30761988042689753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192479219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91598797,0.0032945008,0.0011452736,0.0072651515,0.000028168744,0.000057107485,0.00036527883,0.0000065787663,0.071849935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444854,0.0009858268,0.00027382417,0.00016378069,0.000005821555,0.00001202885,0.000057126028,0.0000031588283,0.00404987],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933468,0.0012361355,0.0001528866,0.00048468416,0.0033188742,0.0014606884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99040145,0.0036180294,0.0014897495,0.0002570645,0.0034683184,0.00076546404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041329144,0.00019059914,0.00028497513,0.002356011,0.008146518,0.0065026768,0.0014269501,0.0011859727,0.003654946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014784053,0.00022419779,0.00022582142,0.00522453,0.011313706,0.0023582445,0.0020563956,0.0017942266,0.00015355508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009598529,0.00010063452,0.22126843,0.0004134627,0.0000831147,0.0005421284,0.36493602,0.0013220799,0.000685799,0.33589566,0.0068142805,0.06784237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000150938995,0.000046041278,0.75860476,0.0005249912,0.00005887023,0.00018796479,0.1854727,0.0006555344,0.00037426603,0.008666888,0.045298163,0.00009476221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08938145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08938145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.094011664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6485108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192879709","doi":"","title":"THE CANADIAN DEFAMATION ACTION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Liability; Law; Cause of action; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; History","score_opus":0.2110663506590466,"score_gpt":0.46872107221914083,"score_spread":0.2576547215600942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192879709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323341,0.001609255,0.00028840618,0.0026744544,0.00003598048,0.00034125158,0.0076124133,0.000030448535,0.05507361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98234105,0.0021038877,0.0005946978,0.00054268824,0.000031246353,0.00014832607,0.0033590144,0.000019287587,0.010859729],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946405,0.0003906218,0.00018444825,0.000408426,0.0030319965,0.0013439835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97642744,0.0045320867,0.0045044897,0.0006026653,0.011302509,0.0026308142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026726325,0.0003896343,0.00063700206,0.0095860455,0.011737939,0.0035458747,0.002014672,0.0009731014,0.0073053334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015924316,0.00047258046,0.00042535996,0.024700044,0.002918302,0.0012612573,0.0020443196,0.0016413117,0.00065678114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023283719,0.0005019058,0.8230786,0.00049355987,0.00007359433,0.0012765285,0.06496842,0.0007159146,0.00050606625,0.013116262,0.03599371,0.059042532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015433823,0.00004477473,0.9088377,0.00013598205,0.000029693918,0.00021758943,0.05085659,0.00050367205,0.00017732831,0.00021802336,0.03890474,0.000058588485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99729246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9168295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08317047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084899746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60344684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193857824","doi":"","title":"Variations and Consideration in New Zealand and Canada: Gloria Jean’s Coffees International Pty Ltd v Daboko Ltd and Rosas v Toca","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; High Court; Legal certainty; Choice of law; Political science; Common law; Duty; Certainty; Business; Conflict of laws; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00870994786909918,"score_gpt":0.2614374681440859,"score_spread":0.25272752027498674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193857824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21925801,0.013446238,0.002235961,0.10769472,0.00085970724,0.00037504267,0.00092736795,0.00008152316,0.6551215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85362744,0.002813496,0.0025600442,0.031397767,0.000107819506,0.00012640216,0.00018495003,0.000074242125,0.109107785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98451775,0.0012841112,0.00051143725,0.0016967169,0.0068810224,0.005108991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927902,0.0018720821,0.0005203239,0.00036702646,0.0023921586,0.0020582206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051763845,0.00061779947,0.0006271934,0.0016495688,0.019129574,0.00976292,0.003567813,0.009622489,0.0067947577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016896345,0.0010095394,0.0010305719,0.0032261023,0.016219085,0.0035439616,0.0054477607,0.01318295,0.00043015383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013411256,0.00006681164,0.009337216,0.00020367862,0.000080337144,0.0030053975,0.03835194,0.0006865132,0.0012420164,0.860742,0.05640333,0.029746655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021914246,0.00012781222,0.074561976,0.00083930173,0.0002140805,0.0015729578,0.04795832,0.001709225,0.0016141763,0.06434096,0.80609334,0.0007487474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110588424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110588424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15923436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80237895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194096526","doi":"","title":"Property in Tissue (Again) and Negligent Conception","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Property (philosophy); Estate; Law and economics; Property rights; Liver tissue; Order (exchange); Law; Personal property; Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Medicine; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.01693791516773191,"score_gpt":0.3165441350458687,"score_spread":0.2996062198781368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194096526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030544765,0.017510183,0.0409093,0.27933142,0.0021111958,0.00007827824,0.00017693092,0.00004909676,0.6292888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8669975,0.0045779096,0.005848299,0.055822223,0.0021296223,0.0001661565,0.00007996932,0.00006220015,0.064316176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942479,0.002070753,0.0002680721,0.0010158818,0.0015738719,0.00082349154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994852,0.003340931,0.00030442319,0.00063637464,0.00052722805,0.00033892624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007661461,0.00030610035,0.00047786886,0.0011090545,0.0051838523,0.0068148896,0.0017132815,0.010788139,0.006509883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010709509,0.0002823588,0.0008098952,0.0006766007,0.046041265,0.0097667705,0.0047247577,0.011673491,0.0007470552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010452856,0.0000019802976,0.000042467007,0.00000408678,5.682074e-7,0.000046302157,0.00063760346,0.000016879132,0.000017578657,0.99764997,0.0010582813,0.00052330975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055267406,0.000015557885,0.00023609404,0.00010076612,0.0000046484997,0.00019803208,0.0008796038,0.00016973898,0.00008873112,0.920322,0.07797009,0.000009179109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01213189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066022607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01213189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059856274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004607614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043429017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195145689","doi":"10.32920/24653421","title":"Contracting Out Liability for Negligent Pre-Contractual Misrepresentation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Plaintiff; Tort; Law; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.09143209179677932,"score_gpt":0.4412174807270089,"score_spread":0.3497853889302296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195145689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56413674,0.0014363447,0.078538455,0.007756976,0.00020524333,0.00038678385,0.000063975676,0.00013327484,0.34734222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644069,0.00035386276,0.0073822686,0.0009067892,0.00007193211,0.00006838198,0.000030174697,0.000013594031,0.026766146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914157,0.0018043244,0.00051083684,0.0006209116,0.00423681,0.0014114102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924028,0.003951483,0.0010356883,0.0013806557,0.0008534099,0.0003760345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006935061,0.00026620133,0.0002895482,0.00073238084,0.0019830065,0.0023936431,0.0013593322,0.002354934,0.0060444553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012144847,0.00027335915,0.00050934555,0.00040799275,0.0028310756,0.0019837588,0.003130489,0.002266166,0.0007554153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007615983,0.00016389467,0.016062759,0.0000843746,0.000037443147,0.0028155555,0.0076546445,0.0040849755,0.0063724774,0.88621217,0.0035148258,0.07292076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020011597,0.0010313045,0.046304017,0.0013372687,0.00029152154,0.008104574,0.011909437,0.035628952,0.035507604,0.5710196,0.2884025,0.0002631225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048934794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066411784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006935061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016931777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00633163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036676526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196392441","doi":"10.1002/iir.1430","title":"Principles and rules on insolvency practitioners' remuneration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Remuneration; Creditor; Legislature; Commonwealth; Business; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Meaning (existential); Accounting; Restructuring; Law; Economics; Finance; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0710076039705598,"score_gpt":0.38368609644022966,"score_spread":0.31267849246966983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196392441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041417178,0.0060386127,0.11347577,0.122688286,0.002462787,0.0013679229,0.0004438438,0.0003971336,0.71170855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76992255,0.0037354212,0.089502886,0.048143715,0.0023150402,0.0022051642,0.0002645792,0.00017504003,0.083735615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9214601,0.024764173,0.010848871,0.0061704866,0.030443426,0.0063129035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.928099,0.03606551,0.0061151707,0.0066696387,0.02061701,0.0024335422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06484268,0.00070281205,0.0012423842,0.0037836418,0.007845171,0.013543886,0.0050499095,0.018142551,0.0026706909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07889329,0.0015529416,0.001483478,0.0018444249,0.03508551,0.0061558792,0.006677978,0.017658992,0.0017505493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053738927,0.000040647934,0.00038950614,0.00004637684,0.0000059484414,0.00010548522,0.002792384,0.00038632096,0.0001630977,0.98464,0.0066645863,0.004760279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007727968,0.00010641614,0.0021167689,0.0011021631,0.000036842994,0.00034664618,0.0018280443,0.0019405121,0.0008974587,0.8199289,0.17145714,0.00016171882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014202016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013942541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06484268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006804328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025277425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34292495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196806002","doi":"","title":"R.V.P.C.: Accused Does Not Have Right to State-Funded Counsel for a First Appeal – Necessarily","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Balance (ability); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013197572346375325,"score_gpt":0.29527868259889967,"score_spread":0.28208111025252436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196806002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04922013,0.0024596131,0.0023541965,0.14119987,0.001782434,0.00017176819,0.00093929813,0.00020982952,0.8016629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5380802,0.0016936263,0.0019803112,0.12294356,0.0011735598,0.00014184501,0.00033498497,0.00010582888,0.33354604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964142,0.00027579282,0.00015461445,0.0004960371,0.001490734,0.0011686108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628085,0.0014964226,0.00022296004,0.00028365213,0.0014000767,0.00031600014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022669479,0.00036759395,0.0005536516,0.0007311379,0.007727889,0.004853047,0.0020086744,0.016012287,0.012403319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011443951,0.00053389306,0.00083692285,0.00074693066,0.0040334794,0.0014204518,0.0011969849,0.0068709105,0.0033091356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094151495,0.000046247118,0.0072606388,0.00012721216,0.000052364183,0.0027776046,0.0045884927,0.0004320643,0.0015148078,0.6235071,0.34302652,0.016572854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000954028,0.000100656616,0.01569337,0.00041464134,0.00017028356,0.0020518545,0.0038131236,0.0015176153,0.0022877848,0.067426026,0.90629995,0.00012929065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5131986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7175646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5131986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010780661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02619556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9793365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197231371","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3482","title":"Operative Subsidiarity and Municipal Authority: The Case of Toronto’s Ward Boundary Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Federalist; Law; Constitution; Political science; Public administration; Judicial review; Legislation; Supreme court; Sociology; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.057990767656758875,"score_gpt":0.36781026215209295,"score_spread":0.3098194944953341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197231371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26500222,0.039118443,0.0027182284,0.14083181,0.00085586373,0.00023515522,0.0008172034,0.00008331472,0.5503377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402864,0.007343868,0.000795001,0.009063464,0.00019411705,0.000042981097,0.00016671351,0.00003997295,0.042067487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891719,0.0018466709,0.0006284282,0.0008494925,0.0036711255,0.0038323915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98361915,0.0071712285,0.0012177672,0.00079311413,0.004845309,0.002353499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073288404,0.00021531721,0.00033851326,0.0023059864,0.02136957,0.010677753,0.0019557748,0.0046446756,0.003669708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015992606,0.0004892283,0.00051307713,0.0042214952,0.012192909,0.002474899,0.0037069516,0.0039425297,0.0002736267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020506868,0.000009913845,0.005602693,0.00027408125,0.000028682009,0.0035237647,0.04981009,0.00061317184,0.0003978476,0.8752732,0.049516145,0.014929819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025572474,0.0000214728,0.026980657,0.0006829883,0.00010020204,0.0007599528,0.045610826,0.0006221969,0.00073283346,0.024346557,0.89997184,0.00014490045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.962752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9854468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15930611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15930611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16026434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97508574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198167484","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Declarations of Unconstitutionality in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Constitution; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Legislation; Charter; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; History","score_opus":0.006912495185716458,"score_gpt":0.2748719481782007,"score_spread":0.26795945299248425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198167484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23764051,0.0071640736,0.0015333974,0.09469571,0.0011940185,0.0002477159,0.002354256,0.00014968736,0.6550206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397003,0.0037044524,0.0010659298,0.019270228,0.00021818031,0.00006176955,0.00046275987,0.000069931484,0.03544648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670747,0.0028262679,0.00068680994,0.0018628063,0.015940411,0.011609029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96903324,0.010714043,0.0023468747,0.0011069623,0.014065625,0.0027332234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007760408,0.0005405786,0.0010501351,0.0030898566,0.024442434,0.012370227,0.0033448536,0.004180707,0.008881004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036655925,0.0006957226,0.0013795603,0.006259263,0.014570956,0.002700741,0.00588603,0.00941491,0.00040146688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033520022,0.0001654526,0.034353115,0.0004606046,0.0003784139,0.0014267048,0.015121123,0.009852495,0.001199263,0.8082434,0.091606274,0.036857937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041864335,0.00029608025,0.19693549,0.0018174852,0.0017920573,0.00040882305,0.04238548,0.009125534,0.004723878,0.1079686,0.6328795,0.0012484462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24905066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24905066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3137125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8709948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198668915","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000161","title":"FREEDOM FROM THINGS: A DEFENSE OF THE DISJUNCTIVE OBLIGATION IN CONTRACT LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Impossibility; Duty; Plaintiff; Damages; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012952929264848723,"score_gpt":0.2703564050383964,"score_spread":0.2574034757735477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198668915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029912176,0.0039052793,0.2564102,0.05716342,0.00060502964,0.00018567067,0.00013977596,0.00007832955,0.6516001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94997287,0.001417051,0.025628341,0.0063773408,0.0008953838,0.00035663595,0.0000730514,0.000055777244,0.015223528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861752,0.006901443,0.00056734594,0.0015618295,0.0037504786,0.0010437318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98475164,0.010349014,0.0009031931,0.0019026609,0.0013634108,0.0007300346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016222859,0.00060959684,0.0009192155,0.0024631452,0.0050644246,0.008543179,0.0027987729,0.009196718,0.006330943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016506163,0.0006738963,0.0013724674,0.0015099684,0.05719411,0.013353729,0.008212446,0.011445278,0.00083672587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015644518,0.000003160129,0.000015696025,0.0000036574363,7.933021e-7,0.000011958833,0.00012454166,0.00007233927,0.000011123007,0.99925286,0.00016196503,0.00034027864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006342152,0.0000043262257,0.000025168092,0.0000243274,0.0000016534477,0.00002384845,0.00007179171,0.00047698832,0.000026680611,0.9952733,0.0040621706,0.000003577873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022756974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014705734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016222859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005587728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042101247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08579576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199187393","doi":"10.1017/s0008197321000775","title":"MAKING SENSE OF MESNE PROFITS: REMEDIES","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Damages; Tort; Duty; Breach of contract; Law; Debt; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Liability; Finance","score_opus":0.07136537914229837,"score_gpt":0.3619567587059496,"score_spread":0.2905913795636512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199187393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09400146,0.0031261921,0.032262065,0.057033744,0.0009835873,0.00029320744,0.000057526453,0.0001554643,0.8120869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693216,0.00055711984,0.004349306,0.0032220879,0.0003189064,0.00007658572,0.000013925792,0.000017652688,0.022122838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98092735,0.0057953657,0.0011755527,0.001908862,0.008030962,0.0021619773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98592234,0.007548763,0.0016345362,0.0016100571,0.0024658141,0.00081857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010493838,0.0006207701,0.00075716525,0.0026864342,0.005545987,0.009611132,0.002343206,0.008921648,0.0077143204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026109165,0.0004186346,0.00060724514,0.000880545,0.03271688,0.0074458066,0.0089583285,0.0075301453,0.0007558146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021464122,0.000083080406,0.0009825793,0.000055742712,0.00001612442,0.0007308158,0.0041210707,0.0006057318,0.0005944152,0.9710788,0.0052597495,0.016450439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049742204,0.00012660211,0.0043273172,0.0005025557,0.00005693966,0.0012479805,0.008705062,0.0033152327,0.002928625,0.7851735,0.19344261,0.00012381512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021919122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039678295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010493838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004389414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039712437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055497408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199314467","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896919.001.0001","title":"Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.31044610626318464,"score_gpt":0.4001816735191137,"score_spread":0.08973556725592907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199314467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03379495,0.014880284,0.033669565,0.113393895,0.00077487144,0.00008031097,0.000068701345,0.000068929854,0.80326843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930996,0.007903934,0.01188846,0.010876232,0.0010649607,0.00016369025,0.00006667253,0.00006111032,0.036978852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933869,0.0038706819,0.0001495848,0.00038213137,0.0013942497,0.0008163747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99214774,0.0057249786,0.00048448087,0.0004278312,0.000744242,0.00047067806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064223553,0.00034132187,0.00059272913,0.0031086628,0.009364366,0.026001254,0.001892534,0.00530067,0.0035612097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005809639,0.0004150431,0.0005756439,0.0030653398,0.055088453,0.015463531,0.005255642,0.006671298,0.0003944562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.4863233e-7,0.0000027057813,0.00002755702,0.0000041098833,4.0596495e-7,0.000016970005,0.0026118136,0.0000989923,0.000007855938,0.9955497,0.00094110105,0.0007382187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037626464,0.000008652746,0.00025411602,0.00016641514,0.0000035214027,0.000056215027,0.011004448,0.000754266,0.000052071882,0.83433056,0.15335518,0.000010889437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019385405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01691205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026001254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017394286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009630582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12620497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200250482","doi":"","title":"Negligence, Discretion and the Liability of Municipalities for Building Regulation: The Case for Increased Deference","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Liability; Discretion; Private law; Law; Context (archaeology); Public law; Strict liability; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.024214513798194896,"score_gpt":0.33184865742070896,"score_spread":0.30763414362251407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200250482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69049597,0.0024599852,0.01429734,0.08450507,0.00017189578,0.000090523215,0.000073952615,0.00004006862,0.2078653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610007,0.00012013367,0.0004956672,0.0011431385,0.000023245062,0.000010837766,0.000003816908,0.0000036685008,0.0020993878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810301,0.0042608203,0.0006689108,0.0015182487,0.0067243534,0.0057975072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731005,0.0148869725,0.00313649,0.0022357178,0.0040803086,0.0025600044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01191742,0.00026488636,0.0007574582,0.0018304191,0.014398506,0.008540934,0.003013727,0.007667743,0.0024221912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043879505,0.00048202288,0.0007833697,0.00111851,0.03510195,0.004691694,0.008595415,0.0075001023,0.00014011891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004583428,0.00004595622,0.008171078,0.000047415662,0.000026740407,0.0010162959,0.019510414,0.0015980476,0.0005245786,0.9598053,0.0012254256,0.0079829525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012955914,0.000108542125,0.033448063,0.0005292262,0.00013558932,0.000848258,0.024701996,0.0047049616,0.0010055719,0.8777278,0.05642628,0.00023418797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5696653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6626349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5696653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028599055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052992713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86573803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201062983","doi":"","title":"The Overpaid Tax Litigation: Roadblocked","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Pleading; Mistake; Law; Supreme court; Reinterpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01010651694091457,"score_gpt":0.2858286206511119,"score_spread":0.27572210371019734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201062983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03002725,0.049564995,0.005618928,0.7369626,0.0058128205,0.000058889844,0.00018127986,0.00018811674,0.17158516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6332354,0.032945447,0.003531844,0.26620993,0.007789603,0.00014421681,0.00017893741,0.00014949341,0.055815015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870952,0.0034515501,0.0005693486,0.0015981823,0.0050200657,0.0022657134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741644,0.015334938,0.0015256444,0.0016962729,0.004184805,0.0030939353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015310911,0.00030317623,0.0007582374,0.0022566016,0.0065693757,0.014660727,0.002144051,0.015214519,0.011992362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044289045,0.0005303351,0.0006734257,0.0014886148,0.015547384,0.018291248,0.008643691,0.02835968,0.0023139513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003170399,0.000060282422,0.0005540316,0.00010983246,0.000005922873,0.00030744108,0.0021643585,0.0001974081,0.0001568633,0.8970817,0.06572343,0.033606976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060717564,0.00007967371,0.0020257216,0.0010391624,0.000021865204,0.00085496565,0.003261929,0.000972191,0.00027541324,0.40246904,0.588884,0.000055341945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027952831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042869058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027952831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009030489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027910804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08097279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201852014","doi":"10.7202/1081837ar","title":"Vulnerability and Volition in the Testamentary Law of Undue Influence and Captation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Undue influence; Dignity; Harm; Law; Vulnerability (computing); Settlor; Sociology; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.019071114820054375,"score_gpt":0.2882880869896631,"score_spread":0.2692169721696087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201852014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29249913,0.0045299223,0.01588123,0.034138314,0.00034684732,0.00011965924,0.00006545246,0.00005839656,0.6523611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99046713,0.00031167775,0.00039303835,0.0013437355,0.000060900617,0.000027650553,0.0000060667494,0.000010414486,0.007379344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918691,0.0022783177,0.00021585339,0.0010113175,0.0019245923,0.0027007225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923149,0.0038943223,0.00089602906,0.0006306971,0.0012731042,0.0009910375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071671614,0.000409401,0.00046975364,0.0018974763,0.01438886,0.008958738,0.001593152,0.005056118,0.0035506226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016110105,0.00037913618,0.00045497835,0.0008601189,0.080625206,0.006390419,0.008737034,0.0048579015,0.000224139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012939296,0.000008265582,0.002675403,0.000013312909,0.0000068114714,0.0005864223,0.017168034,0.00028545482,0.00010067486,0.9744752,0.0011669936,0.0035006306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026909012,0.00005459679,0.016464533,0.00036647107,0.000042955642,0.0009284947,0.03222523,0.0016232554,0.00051842665,0.8373158,0.110305116,0.00012826631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27001423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2916956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27001423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023398103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018521246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53688514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202507784","doi":"","title":"Defining Wrongful Dismissal: The Alberta Schism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Schism; Notice; Appeal; Law; Jurisprudence; Dismissal; Common law; Unfair dismissal; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.00669098513290078,"score_gpt":0.2724966439820912,"score_spread":0.26580565884919044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202507784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08108124,0.003238561,0.031952675,0.08123975,0.00070550805,0.000109685454,0.0001176228,0.00008617163,0.80146885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96177274,0.00079184247,0.005204815,0.0063244477,0.00026164888,0.000063251675,0.000036068468,0.000051585936,0.02549362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854835,0.0033326535,0.00043190466,0.0018249056,0.0062247026,0.0027023007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910909,0.00429494,0.00050584273,0.00094530365,0.0025062475,0.0006568692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010384084,0.00053211336,0.0008159769,0.0038515562,0.017418932,0.017486595,0.0043073357,0.010651903,0.00533976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021622175,0.0008383237,0.0007259051,0.002624838,0.063196465,0.008805156,0.010010096,0.012445304,0.0005780658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073816273,0.0000050358585,0.00044738437,0.000006244753,0.0000022552833,0.00010577198,0.0017430803,0.00019745943,0.00004047254,0.9931765,0.0016784965,0.0025899129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017800341,0.000010029769,0.0019199058,0.00013121562,0.000023788749,0.0001969066,0.0045629363,0.0017992673,0.00014731486,0.9598633,0.031268895,0.000058564452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.579003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61299396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42099702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043675315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045178656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8469527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203219762","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab080","title":"Fiduciary accountability shattered","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Power (physics); Faith; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Duty; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04329446647327809,"score_gpt":0.36405394199132934,"score_spread":0.3207594755180513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203219762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07899279,0.0027912483,0.04920499,0.19508728,0.0039054519,0.00006394912,0.00015558032,0.000557708,0.669241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93197227,0.0005086898,0.002583696,0.021505324,0.0009996737,0.00004807072,0.00002920888,0.00011735558,0.042235643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98153424,0.006386108,0.00064342376,0.0028223707,0.006133135,0.0024807758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651109,0.014167443,0.0028021017,0.006153279,0.009607959,0.0021583755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020374645,0.0004260064,0.00062964787,0.0019264019,0.0058443504,0.007966199,0.0011818823,0.0050233514,0.0072815665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050699398,0.0003850049,0.00059053337,0.0009703466,0.020195572,0.0062154285,0.0076956977,0.012219115,0.001538084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001681023,0.000009339533,0.00053740025,0.000012036149,0.0000054160505,0.000056536035,0.0007977647,0.00021887769,0.0001341714,0.9790853,0.0114174625,0.007708905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024924184,0.000049412283,0.0013722867,0.00017074954,0.000028528446,0.00014371425,0.00058597536,0.002820009,0.0011695107,0.8121561,0.18141843,0.000060526127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011039492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006324746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020374645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00911558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075651524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10775268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203319755","doi":"10.82308/2850","title":"Loyalty in Quebec private law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.04288996502148651,"score_gpt":0.293184696783424,"score_spread":0.2502947317619375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203319755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36899802,0.0056450013,0.0013303356,0.052839264,0.00039048438,0.0000838799,0.00044835886,0.000047904894,0.57021666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86092716,0.0010185082,0.00030154848,0.005758036,0.00006450985,0.000031570828,0.00012069395,0.000014503571,0.13176349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983962,0.00023410333,0.000030116547,0.0001787171,0.00041304532,0.00074787746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997759,0.00041265693,0.00017315554,0.00010252221,0.00087432115,0.00067830377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012207754,0.00014475785,0.00026577504,0.0011063995,0.012897316,0.0060088164,0.00086349796,0.0022713428,0.021479253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029077842,0.0001982944,0.00020935904,0.0017553247,0.0049974546,0.0019591416,0.0020866084,0.003118373,0.0006256561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003243602,0.000086254375,0.017437082,0.00007372994,0.000021126318,0.00073543354,0.02157785,0.00047281914,0.00028913494,0.8527405,0.069297224,0.03723635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029778595,0.00005408414,0.105365455,0.0005895698,0.000045458404,0.000289028,0.03321235,0.0029206623,0.00032556808,0.029840128,0.82719755,0.00013035229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9718917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98603326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07047537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07047537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04355054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.511337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203869873","doi":"10.29173/mlj793","title":"Fraud and Knowledge of a Pre-Existing Security Interest under the Personal Property Security Act: Guidance from Other Jurisdictions for Manitoba Courts and Practitioners","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Business; Computer security; Security interest; Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08835478176432539,"score_gpt":0.3281525141459557,"score_spread":0.23979773238163032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203869873","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10447279,0.009494827,0.00907417,0.6558155,0.00043996263,0.0005711734,0.0003800306,0.00010317344,0.21964838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7898843,0.01840038,0.028660996,0.09328554,0.000305054,0.0005203491,0.00030354905,0.00009734578,0.06854235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895969,0.0037731174,0.00078588026,0.00044875577,0.0033745647,0.0020208333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9271808,0.046150267,0.0031394607,0.0019281791,0.017171986,0.004429328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02184953,0.00076550344,0.00071085733,0.0037642657,0.018661799,0.016204864,0.004987615,0.01982053,0.0057306974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069621824,0.0011510141,0.00091985863,0.0025714685,0.020704603,0.007307775,0.00650569,0.014551435,0.00083853974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006529839,0.00040514153,0.07873789,0.00044242863,0.00007646679,0.005262535,0.08736183,0.0019894836,0.0008372305,0.6258813,0.12410434,0.074836075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019060382,0.00015200993,0.072844684,0.009474522,0.00036689272,0.0048454967,0.15947528,0.008175523,0.00365523,0.32475686,0.41561612,0.0004467789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7572454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91298544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24275458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031432454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26948118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4883684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204296663","doi":"","title":"‘Pipikos v Trayans’ - The High Court Revisits Part Performance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Test (biology); Political science; High Court; Legal history","score_opus":0.021510819791550184,"score_gpt":0.2678039574799942,"score_spread":0.24629313768844402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204296663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0664049,0.0009969302,0.005551113,0.093141444,0.0016603846,0.00010814083,0.00029450978,0.00016036886,0.8316822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77742785,0.00047793883,0.0016176205,0.08180435,0.00070203433,0.00011072145,0.00011068618,0.00007882979,0.13767003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896281,0.0015199945,0.00038931603,0.0018569961,0.004408652,0.0021970505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553597,0.0022311346,0.00025053008,0.0006008197,0.0010256902,0.00035583336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062543475,0.0003486912,0.0005188284,0.00066658383,0.008620091,0.006165163,0.0020660304,0.009525171,0.006572426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018206578,0.0004899615,0.00062141,0.0010493746,0.011689527,0.0040716203,0.005132864,0.01847561,0.0014051374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029462126,0.000010519089,0.0009718711,0.000039144485,0.0000063366488,0.0004617129,0.0066077085,0.00020164301,0.00034387884,0.914541,0.06854888,0.008237964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005501247,0.00014417701,0.009958694,0.0004986725,0.00006091132,0.00091599714,0.006926539,0.0011167001,0.002389445,0.21508366,0.76270056,0.00014967938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09609246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12721144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09609246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005347906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013078488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19106627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204540947","doi":"10.14217/9781848590151-en","title":"Bringing Justice Home","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Commonwealth Secretariat eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05270769029204942,"score_gpt":0.31654230388763094,"score_spread":0.2638346135955815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204540947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011736802,0.01835401,0.0013639834,0.09860372,0.030212758,0.00004959308,0.00014783748,0.00026986017,0.84982455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01179476,0.0061073373,0.0010125847,0.027441429,0.004804404,0.000035552694,0.000102217164,0.00018481215,0.94851696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859065,0.00035425124,0.000041933366,0.00016296202,0.000596766,0.00025351794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842703,0.00037714513,0.000044593933,0.00012392581,0.00063207134,0.00039512088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010630718,0.00045131793,0.0005017823,0.0013723046,0.006834356,0.009116868,0.0010912836,0.0031397345,0.04899819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005401523,0.00027578796,0.00045393346,0.000999935,0.0029825396,0.0064486433,0.0041607814,0.007293723,0.017090619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027762262,0.00001041713,0.00005986971,0.00003057473,0.0000011556996,0.00009124263,0.0016665026,0.0000141391,0.00003099023,0.084307544,0.8860003,0.027784484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.0727716e-7,0.0000028730506,0.00005358193,0.000071106006,9.419988e-7,0.00006395955,0.0008907076,0.000009964175,0.000018762177,0.0074765612,0.9914078,0.0000028106533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012435492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039261226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04899819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004278483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005763571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16391528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205252510","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0137","title":"Remedial consistency in private law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Consistency (knowledge bases); Duty; Wrongdoing; Compensation (psychology); Constructive trust; Law; Sequential consistency; Law and economics; Political science; Consistency model; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Data consistency","score_opus":0.01784485825747845,"score_gpt":0.2559892153328297,"score_spread":0.23814435707535125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205252510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10005018,0.0039007238,0.3112837,0.04528895,0.0006880909,0.00037163222,0.00028377256,0.00035605076,0.5377768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627695,0.00042094043,0.02150419,0.0027562203,0.00042382785,0.00025062665,0.00005938525,0.00006414301,0.011751134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96780336,0.011688685,0.0019342685,0.0052838754,0.010353912,0.0029358612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96780425,0.0151482895,0.0032301033,0.008859472,0.004106136,0.00085169397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02244427,0.00037176444,0.001233009,0.0017941993,0.005334093,0.009099592,0.0023711617,0.007719374,0.005239726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05014017,0.00074441126,0.0013054388,0.0014276012,0.039597392,0.012502757,0.0081009725,0.009534921,0.00058781717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024747433,0.00000467215,0.00007054248,0.000006714961,0.0000024729902,0.000017205666,0.00018630456,0.00019630074,0.000030687308,0.9983347,0.00018694939,0.00096107967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012876103,0.000011241538,0.00016893106,0.000033259515,0.000004756763,0.000049030783,0.00011377006,0.00080710027,0.00015690959,0.9914841,0.0071473527,0.000010652057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003948676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018902412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02244427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00645386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00899282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205549043","doi":"","title":"Judicially Licensed Unconstitutionality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Statute; Political science; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Legislation; State (computer science); Supreme court; Peacetime; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.018095047109342417,"score_gpt":0.31357814535862133,"score_spread":0.29548309824927893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205549043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011095154,0.0016809765,0.0162016,0.018677974,0.0030273567,0.00020647772,0.0007165278,0.00049789017,0.94789606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7453096,0.0022750357,0.01535472,0.035539176,0.0046730256,0.00070600864,0.0011297468,0.00044731575,0.19456542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803049,0.0034627693,0.0013139881,0.004089622,0.006913591,0.00391515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807422,0.0070019355,0.0007047551,0.0037369162,0.0071031917,0.00071095454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014153206,0.0007539436,0.0011982014,0.0017660242,0.008636483,0.0101352325,0.0043866327,0.009862383,0.020008534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033865113,0.00076012535,0.001118354,0.0016975228,0.012140397,0.004611345,0.0047491197,0.012286322,0.004243541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015175812,0.000018065277,0.00022335089,0.00003245238,0.000010732902,0.00021197519,0.0006182125,0.00010168867,0.00024568505,0.97014546,0.023247555,0.0051296805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009974138,0.00003718106,0.0008924259,0.00038790674,0.00008488611,0.00029747526,0.0005405988,0.0014273607,0.0018969792,0.45524487,0.5389982,0.00009239378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0899614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10821249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0899614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013160587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025840165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17887557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205641223","doi":"","title":"The Court of Appeal Recasts Fiduciary Accountability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Opportunism; Fiduciary; Accountability; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Business; Political science; Accounting; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.01166941544492292,"score_gpt":0.3018060198811697,"score_spread":0.2901366044362468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205641223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017303849,0.0019814216,0.023121115,0.4793592,0.0073022647,0.00013473068,0.0005334219,0.00032871426,0.46993524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51906693,0.00070954213,0.006439415,0.27224597,0.0028704442,0.00022887609,0.0001847174,0.00029909913,0.19795509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.971789,0.0054003824,0.0018989685,0.0045368993,0.010523116,0.005851684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97012883,0.0149390325,0.0011576627,0.0027615854,0.009705942,0.0013070434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019581871,0.0004945264,0.0014678409,0.0017737284,0.010180454,0.014296461,0.0025527354,0.025451459,0.0072229677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0910608,0.00084019057,0.0014759818,0.0010822028,0.0127871055,0.0070005762,0.0044541676,0.025156837,0.003293737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003437996,0.000014205787,0.00043821134,0.000022951073,0.000010984566,0.0002189062,0.0010631068,0.00013671354,0.00020603221,0.9133093,0.080174804,0.0043704356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081793456,0.00007115128,0.0017738726,0.0003265337,0.00008289308,0.00025368063,0.0011195753,0.0018111498,0.0015009205,0.36877775,0.6240086,0.00019210698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077029794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08121264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077029794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010579529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015310388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15316284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205734119","doi":"10.7202/1082058ar","title":"Contract Variation and Changed Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Notice; Estoppel; Variation (astronomy); Law and economics; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Equity (law); Law; Business; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.03381956063807098,"score_gpt":0.31442457339696034,"score_spread":0.2806050127588894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205734119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22442874,0.0016335165,0.13581258,0.05915554,0.00040276698,0.00015226693,0.00017234978,0.00016253699,0.5780797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899588,0.000099909215,0.0028326502,0.0019603202,0.0000604099,0.000060702463,0.000019014074,0.00002234723,0.004985899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783222,0.009147141,0.00081773795,0.0027368818,0.006749531,0.00222645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883747,0.0051255543,0.0014670184,0.0025407001,0.0015387357,0.0009531943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013056811,0.00031571492,0.00036275655,0.0006342164,0.003874688,0.0068718665,0.0021890688,0.0050179423,0.0035982018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03162547,0.00033701738,0.0007132208,0.00054767134,0.023502268,0.008130195,0.0055327397,0.0076201065,0.00046526737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015827976,0.000011238025,0.00052968063,0.000006220394,0.0000041411117,0.00008283749,0.0012560936,0.00079940073,0.00014641088,0.99368614,0.0005498507,0.0029121016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021200356,0.00005091282,0.00082798186,0.00004475515,0.000007920211,0.00012297185,0.0007062494,0.0033694238,0.00032329533,0.97911936,0.015368486,0.00003744918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004601117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00292926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013056811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008793698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048648105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06905186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206152380","doi":"","title":"Understanding Administrative Law -- Chapter 1 (A Values-Based Approach)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Judicial review; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Comparative law; Common law; Public law; Legitimacy; Realisation; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1488256602449083,"score_gpt":0.3490439989028122,"score_spread":0.2002183386579039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206152380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035458382,0.027232619,0.019746887,0.04334082,0.0017112116,0.00013902072,0.00016207661,0.00006906957,0.90405256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3893478,0.06478005,0.033986427,0.026843809,0.005325468,0.0007686022,0.00054917164,0.0004079336,0.47799078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981487,0.0007853854,0.00005795563,0.00017702722,0.00060200336,0.0002290708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867177,0.0007625908,0.000115711235,0.00008009993,0.00021269324,0.00015711549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020952388,0.00048262748,0.00032944154,0.0012964236,0.0048424676,0.013362011,0.0013650313,0.0033476702,0.012989122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026330987,0.00043591182,0.00041761048,0.0021772864,0.014879311,0.009473132,0.0032175605,0.0064072963,0.0031834762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017647914,0.000013542337,0.000119246855,0.00006464207,0.000001473071,0.000034881825,0.0044800066,0.00010742095,0.00006267481,0.9604739,0.02435654,0.010283998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014616548,0.000009967055,0.00048773602,0.0005064114,0.0000018412283,0.00012474983,0.0044043805,0.00012878976,0.00007937186,0.3240545,0.6701941,0.0000066445327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070455573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010056597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013362011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007305471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005328656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05300516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206404968","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2021.1978696","title":"Private law, public right, and the law of unjust enrichment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Private law; Law; Tort; Normative; Liability; Law and economics; Political science; Property (philosophy); Public law; Sociology; Restitution; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0209397891074636,"score_gpt":0.3081491127528706,"score_spread":0.287209323645407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206404968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060689554,0.010861983,0.122018576,0.21508993,0.00077010255,0.00008243943,0.00009373586,0.00016429552,0.5902294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537484,0.001982227,0.009949651,0.014351673,0.00056244776,0.00010589539,0.00003384849,0.000071819195,0.019194158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99137855,0.0039118957,0.000297029,0.001220423,0.0021582288,0.0010339358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925304,0.0046282657,0.0006399642,0.0011847065,0.0006747841,0.0003417988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009497453,0.0003536292,0.00063884974,0.0011010115,0.005696306,0.009905202,0.0013125064,0.006964416,0.0034454162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010768546,0.0003818106,0.0007342544,0.00084395654,0.059372954,0.011603956,0.006820007,0.010655657,0.00045746416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013546252,0.0000032725254,0.00003939058,0.0000042947386,9.4100625e-7,0.00001208846,0.00017325375,0.00005533247,0.000018652363,0.99853826,0.000391963,0.00076120725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033469205,0.000004285008,0.00007143819,0.00002318071,0.0000017075773,0.000019742472,0.0001449213,0.00016215828,0.000077083045,0.98958963,0.009898868,0.0000036891163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042939596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004395557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009905202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058184536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056386595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05022794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206563963","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v3n2p156","title":"Just Laws versus Unjust Laws: Asserting the Morality of Civil Disobedience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Obligation; Civil disobedience; Unjust enrichment; Morality; Moral obligation; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Sociology; Public law; Restitution; Politics","score_opus":0.05195223054659951,"score_gpt":0.3656830429348158,"score_spread":0.31373081238821626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206563963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14805464,0.003544459,0.028806658,0.27119675,0.0010852675,0.00008272433,0.000060491428,0.000072183655,0.5470969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98766786,0.00039443685,0.0015307855,0.0060702786,0.00016590147,0.000033206565,0.000007926295,0.000020153886,0.004109413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98696995,0.009102118,0.0003966539,0.00096846273,0.001436488,0.0011264419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98355573,0.011302598,0.0014513155,0.0013838263,0.001463779,0.0008428174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012903863,0.00030573984,0.00056005537,0.0009250931,0.006406288,0.01026228,0.0011314012,0.007859647,0.0029305764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026525483,0.000357297,0.00036834006,0.000635273,0.08167251,0.011055011,0.0047978894,0.008262509,0.00031419643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008399248,0.0000087526305,0.00023564443,0.000011790967,0.0000036119307,0.000048579583,0.0073947054,0.00006471964,0.00005896872,0.98935413,0.0012651959,0.0015455126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014356766,0.000012561533,0.00043708752,0.000062149564,0.0000050568574,0.00005170055,0.005279683,0.00030745607,0.00012940192,0.9789145,0.014773415,0.000012593668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006949516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056749294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012903863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049206982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004762169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06824303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206674422","doi":"","title":"Restitution & A Restorative Justice: A Call for the Expansion and Increased Use of Criminal Restitution Orders at Sentencing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Damages; Compensation (psychology); Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06930908809955975,"score_gpt":0.36058799488163246,"score_spread":0.2912789067820727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206674422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034045953,0.01050084,0.023282234,0.64100736,0.001782454,0.00023949848,0.000070626884,0.0006946525,0.2883764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7104437,0.015240678,0.046580397,0.14927208,0.0035901456,0.0005250351,0.00009846408,0.00043231455,0.073817134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738271,0.008905906,0.0010212449,0.0014598087,0.0103262635,0.004459725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976266,0.011821817,0.002252702,0.0023131992,0.004484106,0.0028621557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018226799,0.00042329382,0.0006873823,0.002135836,0.008039182,0.012605889,0.003944174,0.009026978,0.00636566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031908266,0.0005554564,0.00096140295,0.0009846133,0.018625151,0.011341512,0.007037409,0.012192393,0.0011245051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004418585,0.00017750557,0.0024404353,0.00019406171,0.000014894468,0.00041498832,0.010876241,0.0015647558,0.00087957195,0.7189282,0.08238756,0.18207759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005588241,0.0003434468,0.0147800725,0.0018558291,0.000034514316,0.0009854989,0.012832819,0.0019194143,0.0010753198,0.16782789,0.79804415,0.00024519555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07064346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16925557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07064346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01218074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045855086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14046454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208053832","doi":"","title":"La consécration par la Cour suprême du Canada d'un principe directeur imposant l'exécution du contrat de bonne foi","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011771579213172421,"score_gpt":0.22393120779851894,"score_spread":0.2121596285853465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208053832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054427285,0.0056690504,0.009662077,0.04869789,0.0027968062,0.00012772228,0.0002824992,0.0001306893,0.8782061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6053332,0.0016545075,0.004414573,0.009750752,0.0004335227,0.00010137886,0.000077228964,0.00013850993,0.3780962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910102,0.0008678492,0.00022588507,0.0011168768,0.0038044187,0.00297476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958978,0.00086271804,0.00015757456,0.00037904354,0.0021979848,0.00050489156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043367883,0.0007986607,0.0008273649,0.0012149891,0.019227521,0.012673574,0.0019839825,0.008077228,0.0123028485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01216931,0.00080623303,0.0010618333,0.0012939138,0.014572599,0.0026397188,0.0038508596,0.01706771,0.0009322881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024772287,0.000009005255,0.00051465246,0.000026249325,0.000017836735,0.00013035412,0.002457379,0.0003836097,0.00024461313,0.9779652,0.011880014,0.006346321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073050156,0.000044784098,0.0047752056,0.00041786605,0.000083248815,0.00026803734,0.003708369,0.0011686966,0.0016107691,0.12980984,0.857896,0.00014410468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.938076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9631059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06557551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06557551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11206322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47578585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211048706","doi":"","title":"Transparency in the service of ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue Internationale De Psychosociologie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Remuneration; Obligation; Accounting; Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.27198793452982234,"score_gpt":0.42670053735161484,"score_spread":0.1547126028217925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211048706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01640601,0.014249414,0.08383583,0.3482836,0.002881354,0.00016745026,0.00012576598,0.00018035309,0.5338702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89443946,0.0054691206,0.021891769,0.034982774,0.0033971725,0.0003106418,0.00008976377,0.00018708591,0.039232202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94741315,0.03500729,0.0017818399,0.0037610983,0.008832485,0.003204166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540698,0.027841136,0.0035592853,0.006516199,0.0057503777,0.0022632135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03347398,0.00086339103,0.0012703926,0.0018421832,0.009368118,0.0150050195,0.0015383528,0.008650518,0.0052030063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04369729,0.0005022785,0.0008368435,0.0014441567,0.08598661,0.012775366,0.008527732,0.014014968,0.0013543062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044057174,0.0000059077083,0.000098944234,0.000029343884,0.0000049824475,0.000034648758,0.0034171315,0.00009445323,0.00007207592,0.99003625,0.0032744308,0.002927359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009912902,0.00001288127,0.0001559888,0.00012076065,0.000004250308,0.000065236185,0.0010902961,0.00021494739,0.00011301284,0.9363361,0.06186386,0.0000128355905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073169954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038260773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03347398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009965648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01766215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17702943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211235346","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3331612","title":"The Interface Between Sales Law and Secured Transactions Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interface (matter); Business; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.01403247581716833,"score_gpt":0.3193433124179118,"score_spread":0.3053108366007435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211235346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06529706,0.0053585176,0.19563287,0.09011829,0.0008528282,0.00012227512,0.00036694974,0.00031264388,0.64193857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95390195,0.0017246691,0.013863804,0.0032541063,0.0008135006,0.00015503597,0.00007339399,0.00011066245,0.02610282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928196,0.004040949,0.0003113535,0.00061764993,0.0017826009,0.00042780605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97954994,0.015693728,0.0013747406,0.0017559823,0.0010259325,0.0005996768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061066863,0.0003339938,0.0006329438,0.0022574123,0.0020070223,0.014020234,0.0013388672,0.0072514378,0.028420636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02704203,0.00070399157,0.0005144062,0.0025641553,0.02041377,0.023439683,0.004639168,0.006618201,0.002274747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035346013,0.0000043780947,0.000075566044,0.0000052991622,5.974489e-7,0.000014585996,0.0001892248,0.000070333546,0.000028453765,0.9980544,0.00048832427,0.0010652051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001120202,0.000009327301,0.0002617108,0.00003883564,0.0000022183287,0.00006260535,0.0004066475,0.0012427826,0.000081644735,0.9853978,0.012478746,0.0000066002663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025830397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014916777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028420636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003522831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032555242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09507644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211457273","doi":"","title":"Civil Appeals in Ontario: How the Interlocutory/Final Distinction Became So Complicated and the Case for a Simple Solution?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Appeal; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; CLARITY; Jurisdiction; Law of the case; High Court; Sociology; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.040599806276706084,"score_gpt":0.28985183932433667,"score_spread":0.24925203304763058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211457273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25451845,0.021687156,0.0031503884,0.3176159,0.0018534358,0.00026323748,0.0016104624,0.00013357654,0.3991674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84246904,0.0117797805,0.0017412807,0.017457986,0.0004790157,0.00006549464,0.0004516308,0.00011870455,0.12543704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928598,0.00071285875,0.00020959109,0.00059034384,0.0028970954,0.0027303055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99013317,0.0021087423,0.0008126019,0.0004334579,0.0038048981,0.0027070963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003956514,0.000247641,0.00034005064,0.0020292106,0.017468475,0.007748029,0.0022169119,0.0027806687,0.008713542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015109525,0.0007909513,0.00059072196,0.004438881,0.01389738,0.0038168898,0.0037310205,0.0046696723,0.00070744444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016491236,0.00008303357,0.0693979,0.0005982404,0.00007327142,0.0041725375,0.09308613,0.0007660994,0.0014937337,0.44424084,0.24011664,0.14580664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034466586,0.00003108207,0.18155028,0.000641142,0.000059126738,0.0006235194,0.05782985,0.0006834822,0.00041364363,0.01957289,0.73839957,0.00016096534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23630254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23630254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22112642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8857808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212206078","doi":"","title":"Prospective Overruling Unravelled","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Dignity; Injustice; Political science; Substantive law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011948360914780728,"score_gpt":0.2985914174258738,"score_spread":0.28664305651109306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212206078","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10428334,0.0058850828,0.5403063,0.021934688,0.001686217,0.00021972407,0.000091228816,0.00035238004,0.32524103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91292286,0.0013700083,0.061776478,0.0020523774,0.0004527822,0.00008979706,0.000036559435,0.00008998729,0.021209253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855054,0.006135143,0.0007991028,0.0024824073,0.00412187,0.000956088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98035985,0.0067470637,0.0020505313,0.006518417,0.0036684338,0.00065557536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020903092,0.00039384226,0.0005287784,0.0010488918,0.0033707302,0.0068748514,0.0018676335,0.002411528,0.0046173236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026887236,0.00047141765,0.0005969125,0.0007984362,0.011949162,0.007955263,0.0058884695,0.0048970426,0.00094385614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013583686,0.000014550172,0.0012184156,0.00003583794,0.000006154259,0.00011633129,0.001565761,0.00045234698,0.0003692487,0.963458,0.0010914133,0.031658337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022043321,0.00010618165,0.0014684858,0.00028440735,0.000033935168,0.0006805208,0.001177319,0.004209727,0.002955023,0.89529806,0.09370751,0.00005681473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085238105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014107864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020903092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021396729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006644162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11054748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W321300874","doi":"","title":"Book Review – Liability of the Crown, 3rd ed., by Peter Hogg & Patrick Monahan","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Statutory law; Liability; Law; Perspective (graphical); State (computer science); Common law; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.006535668266675321,"score_gpt":0.2721116614992769,"score_spread":0.26557599323260156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W321300874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004113734,0.75970787,0.0015292811,0.041000508,0.029999726,0.00007605486,0.0005283812,0.00020634833,0.1665404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033934526,0.50911313,0.0012814129,0.013465106,0.012747543,0.00011300306,0.00069663033,0.00018153116,0.4590082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999129,0.00008583427,0.000040371106,0.00008252483,0.0006150574,0.000047221838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851066,0.0004875119,0.0001033042,0.000047797792,0.0007235076,0.00012726182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007070248,0.00082069385,0.0010078936,0.0026025714,0.0011876306,0.00350954,0.0012866026,0.0015571904,0.051256917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037507212,0.000468129,0.00050463795,0.003733703,0.0011223038,0.0037832104,0.00087299,0.002685324,0.03476252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027748404,0.000005266354,0.000020828002,0.00020039236,0.0000018975588,0.000014244457,0.000050211547,0.000056929213,0.000036325684,0.0027414705,0.96231705,0.034552637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001307471,0.0000044047183,0.0001521925,0.0003585742,0.0000018123272,0.00006317268,0.000043208398,0.000022007738,0.000013597591,0.0012428571,0.99809355,0.0000033349065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012451001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027309284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051256917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030317556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005992676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17147148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214965417","doi":"","title":"Prospective Overruling Offends the Rule of Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Adjudication; Political science; Rule of law; Legal doctrine; Politics","score_opus":0.015374354426145027,"score_gpt":0.3023996785738874,"score_spread":0.28702532414774234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214965417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006389336,0.007833726,0.03480865,0.06907259,0.002717579,0.00009163542,0.000138634,0.00019520683,0.87875265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53880996,0.008890063,0.01936323,0.1075117,0.010218858,0.0005792216,0.00022578207,0.00039584024,0.31400546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98509604,0.0032472145,0.0007049236,0.0029554116,0.006851841,0.0011445548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99312687,0.0038357761,0.00042322697,0.0014151988,0.0009471444,0.00025183475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009252772,0.000580431,0.00068170106,0.0012285338,0.004710974,0.014207132,0.0013857451,0.01190371,0.0045586317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015178873,0.0007800151,0.00076768734,0.00076337485,0.03429101,0.010410711,0.00444515,0.013102638,0.002778502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032900966,0.0000061061273,0.00004161117,0.000008505846,0.0000012042957,0.000026974558,0.00036339884,0.00009186006,0.000045026827,0.9866829,0.007562266,0.005166982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014717299,0.000038073784,0.0002610122,0.00016595327,0.000006797773,0.000088202294,0.00025934185,0.00048954185,0.00029356632,0.63575983,0.3625901,0.00003279215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011549633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008254046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014207132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005742357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011248925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048933923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215074703","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Common-Law Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.01472438140394272,"score_gpt":0.2733152877712637,"score_spread":0.25859090636732096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215074703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022983437,0.009075203,0.0014935414,0.053844463,0.0005293193,0.00007769817,0.0026327437,0.000244044,0.90911955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40514466,0.005113881,0.00077628787,0.0047599245,0.00012898429,0.000034271565,0.00075018895,0.00018030171,0.58311146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964986,0.00021200223,0.00006576924,0.00024491368,0.0012068913,0.0017716954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947167,0.000493734,0.00017806745,0.00021996847,0.0021132876,0.00227817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011604092,0.00027269617,0.00035743002,0.0018647531,0.015921297,0.009248555,0.0013110396,0.0024978837,0.07377423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056797583,0.00044596152,0.00034508685,0.004773471,0.0046886248,0.0033521468,0.0030993698,0.0031470652,0.0042736568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021487538,0.000022864291,0.0035737029,0.00008414949,0.000011767453,0.00031552106,0.0033133388,0.00033267762,0.00006910927,0.5669447,0.3924939,0.032816738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009671968,0.000007212955,0.0066881757,0.0001994603,0.000011549123,0.00010726471,0.0041591874,0.0004613906,0.00008713775,0.016798493,0.97144055,0.000029743214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.989394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10313662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10313662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17615509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74831206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215460403","doi":"10.29173/mlj730","title":"Sharing a Life: Manitoba Legislation Respecting Rights and Obligations of Common-Law Partners","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Common law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.05481725230381535,"score_gpt":0.3430010980170419,"score_spread":0.2881838457132266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215460403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18325077,0.00918133,0.0066149817,0.09394343,0.002656986,0.0028087972,0.001891416,0.00043294136,0.69921935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3005913,0.0033081467,0.01051929,0.066708155,0.00041475968,0.0017556755,0.00044484253,0.00006606296,0.61619174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964761,0.00044318303,0.00020811344,0.00040525934,0.0012346994,0.0012326757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977289,0.0005564276,0.00019181884,0.00021194294,0.00069736404,0.0006136195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040041707,0.0007252068,0.00040913158,0.0012627814,0.019858705,0.0043679527,0.0031110027,0.009115291,0.011124138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003958907,0.001707791,0.0005650535,0.0010671965,0.0062474287,0.0016386783,0.005386371,0.005772412,0.0017001592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118805474,0.000494249,0.019129647,0.00035155477,0.000043332027,0.004290254,0.047102343,0.0008072546,0.0072174203,0.6280428,0.23530674,0.057095513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007267523,0.00012497515,0.026427727,0.00051627104,0.00004092058,0.00053568475,0.0073481533,0.00045535524,0.001978071,0.005780975,0.9565999,0.00011939925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83580685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.946979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16419315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02498658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08351463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33032018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216180690","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-88704-9_2","title":"Property and Privacy in Context","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Future of business and finance","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Intersection (aeronautics); Information privacy; Computer security; Tangible property; Intellectual property; Personal property; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Intangible property; Epistemology; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021128607349247916,"score_gpt":0.2460499811286129,"score_spread":0.224921373779365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216180690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000971492,0.01868901,0.007977908,0.0060252054,0.00063904596,0.00002320997,0.00005293435,0.000035348072,0.9655857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18997835,0.024782915,0.005762208,0.005320328,0.0025261617,0.00018351822,0.0001468923,0.00019635414,0.7711033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991048,0.000423602,0.000024971494,0.00013578041,0.0002295552,0.00008132848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995665,0.00024099348,0.000022651453,0.00008284064,0.000051220562,0.000035789817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008775168,0.0008835765,0.00074628287,0.001163546,0.0032904434,0.0091953315,0.0010223365,0.0032828504,0.018553188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017777323,0.00047201925,0.00030587104,0.0019171385,0.01198318,0.010580647,0.0025438475,0.0052530128,0.0037180982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011454857,0.0000028239813,0.000008688958,0.000010737322,5.7560095e-7,0.00001250797,0.00034400873,0.000047319973,0.000015115273,0.98782015,0.008231575,0.0035053468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017776819,0.0000035784183,0.00005239435,0.00008487322,0.0000020954521,0.00005736345,0.0004210195,0.00014809793,0.00004385898,0.66612434,0.33305612,0.000004430914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058590746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009558501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018553188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044538756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024579617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062066615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W330202545","doi":"","title":"Modernising charity law : recent developments and future directions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Political science; Law reform; Public law; Government (linguistics); Law; Common law; Comparative law; Public administration","score_opus":0.014409961622668686,"score_gpt":0.24195138079830564,"score_spread":0.22754141917563694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W330202545","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019706264,0.73463905,0.0019538212,0.16494572,0.007132782,0.000019210222,0.00003567168,0.0001243168,0.089178845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043522578,0.85742176,0.0051623182,0.031139592,0.012266336,0.000054283322,0.000115361414,0.00008351666,0.050234295],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803656,0.0007476469,0.00009712827,0.0001997959,0.0006457082,0.00027328587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99192786,0.0053956746,0.00053851923,0.000342446,0.0011191553,0.0006762834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005526525,0.0003930913,0.00055317715,0.002291931,0.0020412616,0.009838,0.0014628515,0.0062102405,0.013300338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062493975,0.00039465106,0.000410108,0.0051719146,0.008744297,0.014504943,0.0030025854,0.006170954,0.002365722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028893814,0.00012944888,0.00032648983,0.0025893962,0.000008530152,0.00014408951,0.0018498963,0.00055567006,0.00024398752,0.40744928,0.16273516,0.4239391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000768211,0.000028705577,0.00043477665,0.0011846988,0.000003348568,0.00018930889,0.0014307076,0.00021390896,0.00007429311,0.040953312,0.955464,0.000015290963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004350593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007860373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013300338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077469437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059403144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056208313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W331334795","doi":"","title":"What Were the Principles of Nineteenth-Century Contract Law?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Predictability; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017128365771114026,"score_gpt":0.3031149079274654,"score_spread":0.2859865421563514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W331334795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057200223,0.016331177,0.08959283,0.2908642,0.0031058076,0.0001808791,0.0005861595,0.00012762763,0.5420111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88759387,0.010468019,0.03361558,0.018785749,0.0019829085,0.000375112,0.00021939096,0.00010188635,0.046857506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952361,0.0015238775,0.00022548043,0.0006229011,0.0016286012,0.00076300727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545467,0.0016594073,0.0004367753,0.0005054621,0.0013550405,0.00058859185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010530343,0.00043929028,0.0006211305,0.0012907246,0.004315618,0.0075246873,0.0016206291,0.0040927646,0.0046260217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012508503,0.0005328704,0.0005179299,0.0017219868,0.029429397,0.013784341,0.00257095,0.0071528694,0.0012517286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049765836,0.000007538383,0.00012256541,0.000011958304,0.0000016728821,0.000009726483,0.00042669196,0.00008298966,0.000019166953,0.99475044,0.0019307134,0.0026315006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010771877,0.0000064181013,0.00035348826,0.00006806751,0.0000020074497,0.000031485397,0.0005657975,0.0003471696,0.00006287613,0.94682187,0.051718988,0.000011116898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010888992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006406646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010888992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008974472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080793835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06511468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W335128631","doi":"","title":"Is the Law of Contract Seriously Defective if the Court is Unable to award Restitutionary Damages for Breach of Contract? EST-CE QUE LE DROIT DES CONTRATS EST DÉFECTUEUX SI LE TRIBUNAL EST DANS L'IMPOSSIBILITÉ D'ACCORDER LA RESTITUTION DES DOMMAGES ET INTÉRÊTS POUR LA RUPTURE DE CONTRAT?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Breach of contract; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.016700901849583984,"score_gpt":0.3119117633153267,"score_spread":0.2952108614657427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W335128631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051876478,0.0045412593,0.04660613,0.33754712,0.002312522,0.00015488041,0.0004334201,0.00017857355,0.5563495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88656145,0.0025979262,0.013763247,0.04295938,0.0016449131,0.00013835239,0.00014290883,0.000100515084,0.052091345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98002726,0.00331369,0.0012061957,0.0024058411,0.009642132,0.0034049153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98197144,0.009008626,0.0018226261,0.0028707478,0.0034827837,0.00084381405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013912948,0.0004504298,0.0010852163,0.0012664179,0.0057774824,0.012327858,0.0035413187,0.013060105,0.0045288554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039681207,0.00071034743,0.0009096135,0.001443582,0.050719388,0.008509742,0.0030577208,0.01036688,0.0011967922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006280774,0.000008289152,0.0004497284,0.000016698523,0.000007767652,0.00009854672,0.0005604158,0.000103454986,0.00009393713,0.9911026,0.004335175,0.0032172105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020623687,0.000023416706,0.0012561667,0.00009256127,0.000019341798,0.0003245903,0.0008353562,0.000759242,0.0003447978,0.94142467,0.054858096,0.000041116025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05367413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044789314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05367413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009702853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020543337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10672343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33548064","doi":"10.29173/alr271","title":"The Fiduciary Explanation for Presumed Undue Influence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Undue influence; Obligation; Law; Supreme court; Test (biology); Law and economics; Database transaction; Common law; Political science; Economics; Business; Duty; Computer science","score_opus":0.037423114699157746,"score_gpt":0.3697349284908482,"score_spread":0.33231181379169045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33548064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067675866,0.006167626,0.111956194,0.05942053,0.00076655264,0.00017119294,0.00018383967,0.00014938507,0.7535088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798677,0.00095988606,0.0035088498,0.004062757,0.0003638279,0.00006875241,0.000017130842,0.000025330011,0.011125688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931797,0.0017522586,0.0002993556,0.0012044217,0.0023422246,0.0012221414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917538,0.00472793,0.0007311502,0.0013966062,0.0010776873,0.00031286312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007800783,0.0003953895,0.0006191263,0.0019816963,0.0046492545,0.005249286,0.0025358254,0.008970758,0.005898426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019792886,0.00044805798,0.00087357906,0.000751854,0.039824024,0.008044424,0.0053277207,0.007468709,0.0008161628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002540157,0.0000030784424,0.00011174609,0.000006172079,9.819205e-7,0.000093786155,0.0003938926,0.00009056925,0.000026575455,0.9979584,0.00044640203,0.00086575834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016802851,0.000013968899,0.0005369188,0.00010314338,0.000008844994,0.00029531706,0.00042199445,0.00090051885,0.00024225072,0.9741033,0.023334567,0.00002254536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015936187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014603574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015936187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064764065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058844956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0469898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W337012207","doi":"","title":"\"The harshness and injustice of the common law rule...has frequenly been commented upon\": DebatingContributory Negligence in Canada, 1914-1949","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Legislation; Political science; Plaintiff; Common law; Statute; Injustice; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01586883990437358,"score_gpt":0.2562552275807659,"score_spread":0.24038638767639234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W337012207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963729,0.02650022,0.0013304884,0.087745376,0.0009499962,0.00012272771,0.0009221668,0.00008352742,0.28597257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9028471,0.008560939,0.00048077363,0.008071267,0.00011391969,0.000016481059,0.000119162156,0.000034474153,0.07975594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997216,0.0002607238,0.00006666778,0.0002594813,0.0011684129,0.0010286246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975908,0.0006678544,0.00023605234,0.0000751285,0.0010900792,0.0003401764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020831898,0.00033712343,0.0002516948,0.0021912272,0.027860576,0.0043431264,0.0013763543,0.0023446945,0.0028362845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006613707,0.0003059851,0.0002509455,0.0033956247,0.0133840125,0.001364952,0.001900409,0.0032236301,0.00019695052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014562487,0.000105797146,0.075309135,0.000311692,0.000061718696,0.004033637,0.29911444,0.0011492493,0.0019691936,0.3547501,0.1412742,0.121775225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021225902,0.00006471537,0.19161145,0.0004671654,0.00007423058,0.0006804442,0.087490164,0.00043535323,0.001694359,0.008142977,0.7091589,0.00015899279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88082266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11917734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.124082334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86469615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33811915","doi":"","title":"The Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Duty; Bad faith; Good faith","score_opus":0.0097317228422958,"score_gpt":0.24778381147473308,"score_spread":0.23805208863243726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33811915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032318864,0.00940113,0.0028867489,0.13865574,0.0010607478,0.00012186082,0.000291583,0.00007540038,0.81518793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79365075,0.004235501,0.0029617413,0.025110472,0.00021894614,0.00010117022,0.00011949507,0.000070323265,0.17353168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891179,0.0016089131,0.0002687747,0.0008839811,0.004066067,0.0040543787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923988,0.0015186269,0.00029972102,0.0003737149,0.002844973,0.0025642256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043793065,0.0003654543,0.0005058272,0.0009923778,0.029544756,0.0122250095,0.0018902447,0.0068399063,0.0075093014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014514959,0.00046788584,0.00036445417,0.0018825883,0.015767502,0.002675682,0.0052706883,0.0069074747,0.0005843427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014971836,0.000015469532,0.0010930678,0.000043447108,0.000008935643,0.0002116925,0.0050272946,0.00038961673,0.00009423839,0.9082686,0.07232955,0.012503123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042706382,0.000023054848,0.007974848,0.00058021245,0.000039638526,0.00021283638,0.0126248505,0.0023804752,0.0003210419,0.18536374,0.79029965,0.0001369558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99267113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11623493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11623493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31861103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8433474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33884038","doi":"10.29173/alr308","title":"Distinguishing Charity and Politics: The Judicial Thinking Behind the Doctrine of Political Purposes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Politics; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Political question; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04765839451083664,"score_gpt":0.33805393874929457,"score_spread":0.2903955442384579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33884038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040226657,0.1368772,0.030313874,0.31683737,0.0018344005,0.000030275445,0.000049777627,0.000047802423,0.47378266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93584806,0.034313384,0.0039895196,0.012879892,0.0015819431,0.000029951798,0.000023462759,0.000034423258,0.011299283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001545,0.0059069963,0.00017191429,0.00047158412,0.002685919,0.00074807677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889937,0.008531062,0.0005970643,0.00034836616,0.0012491723,0.00028074268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009296472,0.00027794193,0.0005243976,0.0030376127,0.0064696013,0.011391856,0.0014157993,0.0050576967,0.0016639876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011862211,0.00036561422,0.00033756162,0.0027029675,0.049763273,0.0057642297,0.003097243,0.006660471,0.00033230096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013590742,0.0000013276255,0.000060772403,0.000014154547,8.817651e-7,0.00001609906,0.0010420728,0.00005094211,0.000014214757,0.9954123,0.0009826707,0.0024032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000746267,0.000008322932,0.00081822893,0.00037731542,0.000006619806,0.000055739067,0.003643273,0.00022755367,0.00008475525,0.90460426,0.090152845,0.000013592665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071205914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12220427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071205914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014736006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018894713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1415829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35092801","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1268","title":"Book Notes: Seeking Civility: Common Courtesy and the Common Law, by George W. Jarecke and Nancy K. Plant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Courtesy; George (robot); Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.01566589053669137,"score_gpt":0.28606355857332383,"score_spread":0.27039766803663245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35092801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012800191,0.1554645,0.0027526035,0.5414774,0.008325014,0.000042617725,0.00052995567,0.00007383936,0.29005405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047768388,0.15804625,0.0037752513,0.12941411,0.014518549,0.00015737575,0.00052072585,0.00022863077,0.6455708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993857,0.000211144,0.000032157583,0.00008628546,0.00022911838,0.000055544348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969715,0.0023136437,0.00008848341,0.00008110437,0.0004104633,0.00013471665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011715022,0.000822417,0.00044398784,0.0018477188,0.0048351195,0.0055061006,0.0011369307,0.0062521314,0.027991427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045525813,0.0005198031,0.00033910325,0.0030553974,0.0078429105,0.009505967,0.0012691946,0.0064291074,0.0069459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035766218,0.000008392707,0.00007252233,0.000035757374,0.0000015320841,0.000019845493,0.00032410215,0.000064219545,0.000021391466,0.117712565,0.87617075,0.0055653765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013098635,0.000009714724,0.00083382794,0.0004085286,0.000004873888,0.00009756714,0.0014148894,0.00017407046,0.00011780219,0.11955559,0.877344,0.000026014592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049978547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14458124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049978547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042187697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004010541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09937531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W352683167","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-2421","title":"Civil servants and their constitutions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servants; Political science; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.1336717964290577,"score_gpt":0.36760409474230565,"score_spread":0.23393229831324797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W352683167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013501306,0.0060972124,0.0046618544,0.028078433,0.0008624435,0.00006995917,0.00008818561,0.00006510081,0.94657564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78164595,0.005909735,0.0037855494,0.014689176,0.0011845388,0.00031942144,0.00029843798,0.00012124311,0.19204603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99287695,0.003536329,0.00035614707,0.00081849244,0.0010574074,0.0013546855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704945,0.001555989,0.00029220182,0.00053729536,0.00035892523,0.00020618066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064430633,0.0004248016,0.0005590991,0.001657254,0.010716371,0.012186284,0.0010146033,0.004349926,0.009835088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007997602,0.0004334061,0.0004632346,0.0018640476,0.040537093,0.0069206366,0.00613015,0.0071714916,0.0020904746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.784509e-7,0.0000015540844,0.00002144431,0.0000025207246,4.393411e-7,0.000008339532,0.0007390407,0.00001943687,0.00000602646,0.99740595,0.0011021408,0.0006921087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000149160205,0.000011294477,0.00029470868,0.00011352679,0.0000039147303,0.000040167542,0.0016552071,0.000102791644,0.00007945721,0.60718906,0.3904818,0.000013219122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011524494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007972062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012186284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066286675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058792713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04809451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W353839816","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1061","title":"Panhandling for Change in Canadian Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06495406747716567,"score_gpt":0.39219049383555005,"score_spread":0.32723642635838435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W353839816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04058162,0.007667669,0.0014271699,0.11458108,0.0014024819,0.00010663662,0.0004933216,0.00013855068,0.8336014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65973884,0.0055711977,0.0016747419,0.026232943,0.00031508942,0.00008923583,0.00034864782,0.000106287975,0.3059231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920798,0.000579539,0.00015205772,0.00085916556,0.0027789527,0.003550374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946049,0.0006099943,0.00023298757,0.00030452842,0.0027315463,0.001516035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031269628,0.0004644755,0.00046771666,0.0030118679,0.03170017,0.012286242,0.0019687414,0.004247262,0.028855095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087301815,0.00036113773,0.0006083426,0.0046528503,0.014171346,0.0036566418,0.005752338,0.006089424,0.0010919159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024228719,0.000021478887,0.0046074335,0.00010321987,0.000016416092,0.0004231772,0.018346444,0.0002724959,0.0002824374,0.81065595,0.124199316,0.041047387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013291627,0.000010350937,0.010526071,0.00019934011,0.000018958768,0.00009829531,0.013133877,0.00034426825,0.00016509714,0.021668542,0.953772,0.00004979806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99630934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.199502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.199502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27304086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92846423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W379734076","doi":"","title":"Studies on the Quebec law of trust","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Thomson/Carswell eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07791222735974011,"score_gpt":0.3456610472913911,"score_spread":0.26774881993165095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W379734076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039864782,0.03063043,0.0014986782,0.029517988,0.00039619155,0.000051000192,0.00053154776,0.000035483066,0.89747393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7737603,0.017936388,0.000707466,0.0035145567,0.00018027474,0.0000659135,0.00023113897,0.000051373983,0.20355254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996888,0.0009094824,0.00006350143,0.00021880316,0.0010699912,0.00085029384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939512,0.0027759068,0.0003402377,0.00028626458,0.0021923468,0.00045412403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023123976,0.0004900997,0.0004488441,0.0047580893,0.012408022,0.008276876,0.0013874175,0.0031867733,0.022654101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011770308,0.0004248095,0.00040232274,0.00826576,0.008917619,0.0042973734,0.0014722092,0.003791931,0.00073691574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012803827,0.000017819857,0.0018854361,0.000058492118,0.000014034708,0.00018355956,0.005061318,0.00049632794,0.000049346938,0.92396176,0.051264867,0.016994186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028191896,0.000037843693,0.038850367,0.0013762313,0.000058598253,0.00037280776,0.01963201,0.0028061224,0.00023982563,0.10862476,0.8278746,0.00009867114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9859978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99030626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113050334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113050334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055090144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82024145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W394838549","doi":"","title":"L'article 1437 du Code civil du Québec: de l'art de lire un article qui surprend","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006549709771665606,"score_gpt":0.18297352920376822,"score_spread":0.1764238194321026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W394838549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0096805645,0.02639776,0.0064612473,0.1560576,0.00742156,0.00013595875,0.0013240143,0.00029421403,0.79222715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14152612,0.008274952,0.003393601,0.03916477,0.0012566374,0.00017201022,0.0003215073,0.00027405517,0.8056164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967866,0.0005595359,0.000076183496,0.00026951093,0.0016700954,0.000638061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976228,0.00058147515,0.0001299523,0.0001746606,0.0012945129,0.00019652085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017291642,0.000564527,0.00040454706,0.0014788714,0.008143714,0.006750787,0.0010931238,0.0066863783,0.023161912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056445417,0.00038687908,0.00044954164,0.00218364,0.007908253,0.0020885179,0.0012142077,0.005724083,0.003522575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015266383,0.00001631449,0.0007807701,0.000103493796,0.000007800088,0.00013951151,0.004921401,0.0001652787,0.00041363953,0.40805787,0.55516726,0.030211456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032872588,0.0000043345167,0.0023504612,0.00015580839,0.000004594222,0.000054955366,0.0010095368,0.00013540083,0.00018552374,0.0060459035,0.99003017,0.000019917148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9502368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9743283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049763203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03979596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04205162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2887413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W401350563","doi":"","title":"講演 The Canadian Legal System","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"愛知学院大学論叢 法学研究","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.03711435529526692,"score_gpt":0.2711213427919343,"score_spread":0.23400698749666737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W401350563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008077313,0.004778253,0.0016824198,0.08715867,0.0006934908,0.000089307025,0.001064527,0.00013304042,0.89632297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45510802,0.007013432,0.0060208146,0.027578197,0.00067227916,0.00022297271,0.0007700196,0.00016109853,0.50245315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891803,0.0011539256,0.00025027918,0.0010305113,0.0052169794,0.0031679887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904907,0.0010497408,0.00023254108,0.0004491628,0.0063384348,0.0014395597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004992201,0.00067587895,0.0006480042,0.0055577043,0.024925351,0.017380167,0.003061533,0.006214831,0.02546393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015483202,0.00083050475,0.00071642315,0.005972775,0.014675792,0.0044794916,0.0027766174,0.0067232638,0.001896643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004005505,0.000004875878,0.00030345723,0.000019568179,0.0000037319896,0.000018079048,0.0005004411,0.00016383332,0.000020088662,0.9304936,0.063495465,0.004972917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019133166,0.000006176942,0.0039860616,0.00024960362,0.000023594064,0.000041393472,0.0016487169,0.00072961743,0.000104605264,0.1473483,0.8457616,0.00008120889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80697095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19302908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3232531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9359719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40669885","doi":"10.29173/alr274","title":"Limitation Periods for the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Laasch v. Turenne","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Enforcement; Medicine; Law; Psychology; Business; Political science; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.06323478730900274,"score_gpt":0.36445672196360046,"score_spread":0.30122193465459773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40669885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07455183,0.014940651,0.0062954808,0.28026164,0.002309413,0.00028196082,0.00029740977,0.00022637505,0.6208353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69437784,0.002961191,0.0028807423,0.18110907,0.0009645919,0.00019734234,0.00014217451,0.000057166177,0.1173098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98849547,0.0017924559,0.0005721673,0.0011479395,0.0042321268,0.0037597672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98967105,0.0048264847,0.0008770214,0.0008079442,0.001981494,0.0018361099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015845427,0.00040669288,0.0005573417,0.0013405299,0.011544702,0.0094699245,0.0039748535,0.023928327,0.0058035227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021517321,0.00074466626,0.0008548525,0.0008976614,0.00852134,0.0041909833,0.0041952897,0.0138666285,0.0009034907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094044546,0.0000801901,0.0078123463,0.000115194365,0.000043243967,0.0026709,0.008986053,0.0005150617,0.0011671458,0.76963204,0.17826533,0.030618487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016631043,0.00013733604,0.020155756,0.0010030123,0.00012566253,0.0024338707,0.0061021596,0.0014512199,0.0014149282,0.083107226,0.88363224,0.00027025194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44414192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64308465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5558581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018167492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042848177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88311344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200555366","doi":"10.1017/9781108779364.005","title":"The Path from <i>Rodriguez</i> to Bill C-14 and Beyond","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Bill of rights; Parliament; Criminal code; Constitution; Criminal law; Politics","score_opus":0.021378780901432363,"score_gpt":0.22378415176216063,"score_spread":0.20240537086072827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200555366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035202333,0.024648227,0.0012848316,0.086998485,0.0017553627,0.00004239695,0.000106125844,0.00007546845,0.88156885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12558737,0.024387019,0.0033651527,0.067612335,0.00069926394,0.000075377895,0.00016938141,0.00015715901,0.77794695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975981,0.00034177752,0.000026062193,0.0001797765,0.0012070481,0.0006472071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921143,0.0001560824,0.000021415379,0.000024318606,0.0004327307,0.00015397283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010654371,0.00034632327,0.00028606426,0.0011477607,0.0105378935,0.006504325,0.0009795,0.002877051,0.00922434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019836277,0.00020455742,0.00027128833,0.0017383173,0.012058538,0.002077214,0.001567991,0.0062844385,0.0017519095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047195645,0.000009783567,0.00013187202,0.000051976618,0.0000016254711,0.00006621677,0.00409613,0.000080748934,0.00010294179,0.7651627,0.2056228,0.024668463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001787023,0.0000037970906,0.00040555312,0.00013486574,0.0000021981807,0.000029972549,0.0017191282,0.000039357164,0.000080282785,0.021042183,0.9765326,0.0000082224315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88667303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91839784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11332697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06420557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10333023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46584618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205149261","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3949810","title":"The Limits of Public Contract Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Public law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03204163839887879,"score_gpt":0.32003573056107626,"score_spread":0.28799409216219746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205149261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023591615,0.0064782184,0.027029034,0.08129932,0.00046996868,0.00006011114,0.0002436513,0.00010076212,0.8607274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524242,0.0025905648,0.0052434956,0.0076208604,0.0014655429,0.00043537005,0.00009013493,0.000095009804,0.030034687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823455,0.008349075,0.00060835015,0.0019940727,0.0050938576,0.0016091131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953069,0.036517836,0.0015324896,0.0051810313,0.0024971748,0.0012025615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014942754,0.00047979844,0.0016872638,0.002534757,0.0067036287,0.016918061,0.0025649103,0.0117395045,0.01346709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04593897,0.0011527126,0.0010773399,0.0021720075,0.046513636,0.018353509,0.0065601924,0.01350553,0.0017273804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028316463,0.0000053719423,0.000028663764,0.0000047389003,0.000001279194,0.0000071714176,0.00014652318,0.000067419845,0.000008893926,0.99833655,0.00083439465,0.0005561883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000523836,0.0000014480681,0.000033723816,0.000018354443,0.0000016994546,0.000010142215,0.000089151064,0.00017617586,0.000014137745,0.99409133,0.0055559063,0.0000026157736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076629804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004364168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016918061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008290586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008216696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079025745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205175468","doi":"10.21638/spbu25.2020.301","title":"The principle of good faith and fair dealing in English contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pravovedenie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; English law; Fair dealing; Faith; Civil code; Sociology; Civil procedure; Scholarship; Political science; Commercial law; Comparative law; Philosophy; Good faith; Theology","score_opus":0.027510113913749003,"score_gpt":0.30852036392860105,"score_spread":0.281010250014852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205175468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046996705,0.011643926,0.09326452,0.0250408,0.00058575167,0.00016064801,0.00011968145,0.000043340373,0.8221446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294775,0.0037415791,0.015127081,0.007043839,0.0006976241,0.0002811933,0.000059356775,0.000035129106,0.043536693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927725,0.0032043506,0.00041110007,0.0007669019,0.0019755003,0.00086964504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704593,0.0017366811,0.00032237408,0.00034249938,0.0004007148,0.0001518864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005854086,0.00031188942,0.00039137952,0.0009715521,0.003825352,0.007860554,0.0008993783,0.0038728346,0.003593449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009576018,0.00030028465,0.0004353892,0.0011947579,0.018897872,0.006612893,0.0039178557,0.003617747,0.0007645885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021457936,0.0000038134965,0.00010547356,0.000012770746,7.607408e-7,0.00004259701,0.0014982541,0.000061722814,0.000025661822,0.9955591,0.00065708614,0.0020306844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012261701,0.000032706288,0.0013272617,0.00029115874,0.000007535708,0.00024470114,0.002201313,0.00071922934,0.00021384105,0.8832823,0.111642234,0.000025398816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006885287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00579567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007860554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032676961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036216048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030959725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205553498","doi":"10.7202/1084134ar","title":"Creative and Responsive Advocacy for Reconciliation: The Application of Gladue Principles in Administrative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Alienation; Indigenous; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Creativity; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07833572260904663,"score_gpt":0.37257740844483894,"score_spread":0.2942416858357923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205553498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14377524,0.006051263,0.090051934,0.25924867,0.00081137783,0.0006483821,0.00005319479,0.00022684639,0.49913308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567225,0.0006436372,0.019591123,0.013342553,0.000101704245,0.00013843797,0.000010674693,0.000033622822,0.00941561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94031906,0.03970593,0.001440647,0.0023809816,0.008944149,0.0072092693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9473993,0.035701115,0.0043020374,0.004183972,0.0057875034,0.002626031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053618055,0.00039461604,0.0005700282,0.003527702,0.017398704,0.016090255,0.0035629815,0.008473509,0.0034881728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07444741,0.00040023623,0.00078664394,0.0021160115,0.060147837,0.00914822,0.015654836,0.008349996,0.00038573047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013710201,0.00005572642,0.002739901,0.00012714586,0.000014408647,0.00039518435,0.05731281,0.0005503135,0.00023276453,0.89914614,0.0060401307,0.0333718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048381793,0.00006190309,0.007178882,0.0009537435,0.000031762796,0.00041178797,0.088869095,0.0020832738,0.0008153663,0.69034463,0.20906886,0.00013237553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07764979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18846342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98280895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017191036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048005104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28356278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205606591","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u199194","title":"Lefroy, Augustus Henry Frazer, (21 June 1852–8 March 1919), KC 1908; MA; Professor of Roman and English Law and General Jurisprudence, and Special Lecturer on English Constitutional law, Colonial law, and Federal law, University of Toronto, since 1899","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Colonialism; Philosophy; Classics; History; Political science","score_opus":0.013931929720551763,"score_gpt":0.2734808719924744,"score_spread":0.25954894227192266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205606591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016346066,0.22062846,0.00074622943,0.0882567,0.030777887,0.000093061295,0.0022228719,0.00014291085,0.65549725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008774596,0.028357463,0.00030894383,0.0044874134,0.0028341482,0.0000318688,0.0002033143,0.00007469585,0.95492744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994912,0.00007884713,0.000030399262,0.00013309292,0.00017525828,0.000091204696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997156,0.000059579877,0.000036877642,0.000010154194,0.00012206311,0.000055729633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060550525,0.00087029696,0.00040338887,0.0013848506,0.0040379968,0.0027305668,0.00077551074,0.0024669466,0.08547379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015281484,0.00040819545,0.00019529986,0.0015255088,0.0015054782,0.0038238931,0.0012098056,0.0027592988,0.03013297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000148107965,0.00000428013,0.0001555867,0.000065665845,0.0000011353574,0.00007096258,0.0006145445,0.000025586613,0.000037889324,0.016435716,0.9591383,0.023435429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.575091e-7,0.0000012880382,0.00018810427,0.00003799976,2.7532823e-7,0.00001981703,0.00006407963,0.0000027905915,0.000014984664,0.00036506267,0.9993032,0.0000014110007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084385075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20322607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08547379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00676191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036127197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28593832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206255502","doi":"10.1002/iir.1446","title":"The promise and perils of regulating <i>ipso facto</i> clauses","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; De facto; Creditor; Law and economics; Directive; Scope (computer science); Counterparty; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Actuarial science; Debt; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.03841956026906228,"score_gpt":0.38076829224058667,"score_spread":0.3423487319715244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206255502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061824825,0.0075868415,0.025588045,0.34659824,0.0012409029,0.00016089046,0.00019735075,0.00014735118,0.5566556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86943823,0.0035369955,0.00836552,0.080035195,0.0008341202,0.00016260786,0.00010837143,0.00016162301,0.037357263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697397,0.010384061,0.0010982056,0.0026087034,0.010225908,0.005943463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93922824,0.03780311,0.0040565017,0.0051360866,0.011230598,0.00254551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046853814,0.0003626117,0.0005273072,0.0013585978,0.007957153,0.02196573,0.0047130627,0.014510908,0.006335027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056906715,0.00075521594,0.00104355,0.0014923732,0.030398294,0.0145932445,0.005864313,0.020737791,0.00084526115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014351565,0.000010327092,0.00035219901,0.000031158957,0.000005267194,0.000104752806,0.0021145209,0.00036833042,0.00027260403,0.98598844,0.0064978143,0.004240254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000589164,0.00009755811,0.003421664,0.0022728522,0.00006589922,0.0003336915,0.009484015,0.0024664495,0.0024406074,0.47912213,0.5000219,0.00021438391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20023546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18848869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20023546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02673529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04640931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3981399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206569663","doi":"10.1017/9781108606462.021","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206569663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005877453,0.0031577419,0.0030817478,0.0041016913,0.005553604,0.00065334,0.15362518,0.004249739,0.82498926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015039016,0.004258822,0.0016853928,0.0011609752,0.0015165124,0.00032603653,0.073369786,0.0015416011,0.9146369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841595,0.000120547295,0.00020768664,0.00019426063,0.0009355097,0.0001260683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933428,0.00090859545,0.00039913075,0.00067995966,0.0038834116,0.00078597927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010953592,0.0011942402,0.0012227264,0.012263203,0.0016543808,0.0059659677,0.0015484802,0.0011332715,0.8323261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012299077,0.00045928947,0.000613585,0.013348152,0.0005564173,0.0047791805,0.002389161,0.0014220773,0.7882756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014081803,0.000015984584,0.000123689,0.00033318947,0.0000020358586,0.000018811932,0.00004376463,0.000045739143,0.00014314182,0.0023310215,0.9485637,0.048364803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020589027,0.0000061895485,0.00027169485,0.00012683094,0.000001433871,0.000020854277,0.000029980423,0.000016632726,0.00005402022,0.0007904528,0.998676,0.000003797603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006291428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005858772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16767389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026352748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030070022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210543670","doi":"10.1017/9781108329453.008","title":"Accounting governance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business ethics; Accounting; Shareholder; Political science; China; Corporate law; International business; Business; Public relations; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.028653698711207733,"score_gpt":0.23835491570914522,"score_spread":0.20970121699793748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210543670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011544746,0.012418414,0.0029678883,0.01007296,0.0016422655,0.000038467184,0.0006709071,0.00026598305,0.97076863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05210933,0.013230631,0.003324474,0.003570426,0.0020457683,0.0000847409,0.0011659033,0.00018286987,0.9242859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822265,0.00032173455,0.00012867448,0.00028636356,0.00084682455,0.00019385199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988825,0.00027061877,0.0000962929,0.0002642982,0.00038927837,0.00009704109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001666361,0.00045069886,0.00035461583,0.0015125284,0.0018936078,0.007132607,0.0006858269,0.0015890737,0.09215817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037849573,0.00022566858,0.00031250317,0.0024209828,0.0015698046,0.003959313,0.0016922777,0.0019762632,0.023935279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059830522,0.000007209206,0.00023591395,0.000078999234,0.0000043690784,0.00003553034,0.00051184616,0.00023122776,0.000083282095,0.6842516,0.22324651,0.09130751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.328273e-7,0.000002895625,0.00021575278,0.000058624166,0.0000011864415,0.000031100426,0.0000800258,0.000043202475,0.000039654915,0.02810621,0.9714174,0.0000030536476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057482487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059931474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09215817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024008537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003247002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30829978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210613344","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2021.15","title":"Commerce","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.014042337162978286,"score_gpt":0.26799811505427956,"score_spread":0.2539557778913013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210613344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004904553,0.0005536401,0.00028153523,0.0011920492,0.0004330047,0.000045795165,0.0030347926,0.00028401247,0.9936848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005299665,0.0009151626,0.000494536,0.0010365909,0.00012470168,0.000029907718,0.0037991141,0.00020630639,0.98809403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848807,0.000101504,0.00006341838,0.00026249362,0.0009058462,0.00017867082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983215,0.00016669824,0.000048086902,0.0003520793,0.0009268538,0.00018483234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090824254,0.0004823435,0.0004440886,0.0022616682,0.0027096972,0.009249407,0.0010093316,0.0017973192,0.522196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032686004,0.000372602,0.0005538099,0.003487517,0.0008545353,0.003273432,0.0015386245,0.0017426767,0.3177942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041521882,0.000033422206,0.0006139842,0.000118600554,0.000006688337,0.00009532549,0.00022763564,0.000045872344,0.0004039437,0.07485829,0.85127544,0.07227921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029635528,0.0000037676648,0.00046481434,0.0000410823,0.0000015013901,0.000033601686,0.000065019085,0.000018358009,0.000093869516,0.0009195705,0.99835205,0.0000034983918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045390874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056335848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.522196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033372228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004452916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210620352","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2021.69.4.nitikman","title":"Equitable Rescission of Contracts for Mistake in Canada After Great Peace: Whither Solle v. Butcher?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rescission; Butcher; Mistake; Context (archaeology); Law; Equity (law); Supreme court; Political science; Appeal; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.021805855462882967,"score_gpt":0.24005746707332293,"score_spread":0.21825161161043996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210620352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15234469,0.010347951,0.0060618194,0.1968088,0.0012633773,0.00020540484,0.00036883494,0.00011479864,0.6324844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85089767,0.0033841652,0.001989263,0.041803453,0.00019375196,0.000063295534,0.000089830355,0.000037360613,0.101541236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904171,0.00070931815,0.00016872885,0.00062602095,0.0033907937,0.0046881083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970782,0.0007441533,0.00016470169,0.00016157047,0.0011877335,0.00066357123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051069194,0.0004174407,0.0004121069,0.0009261303,0.02427228,0.0072262846,0.0022730117,0.0072068293,0.0043338654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013225249,0.00047149227,0.00056677876,0.0016788378,0.01076561,0.003456934,0.0034946331,0.008606161,0.00031756418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034387165,0.000025447727,0.0026755605,0.000030229754,0.000016679242,0.000774613,0.006971594,0.00049129897,0.0002501711,0.94045925,0.034896456,0.0133743975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012942868,0.00009550975,0.025336837,0.0006370344,0.00011957645,0.0009086557,0.021062333,0.0031428353,0.0019590338,0.1761335,0.770112,0.00036322733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9824326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99267817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07993853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07993853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19067004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57999736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210863005","doi":"10.1093/indlaw/dwac001","title":"The Future of the Employment Contract","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Scholarship; Common law; Closing (real estate); Fiduciary; Law; Work (physics); Judicial opinion; Political science; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Liability; Sociology; Good faith; Duty; Engineering","score_opus":0.04719369154176292,"score_gpt":0.31007707972190857,"score_spread":0.26288338818014567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210863005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007356838,0.039578576,0.01017288,0.11371493,0.0014830271,0.000021145745,0.00005406804,0.0000321204,0.8275864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66776544,0.03133125,0.00587675,0.019386277,0.0038272187,0.00013500606,0.00008219153,0.00007773995,0.2715181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963187,0.0013882038,0.000079434336,0.00035675403,0.0013011103,0.00055571506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981875,0.0008985901,0.000096581505,0.00018929642,0.00036669936,0.00026129084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033456245,0.0002427683,0.0002729935,0.0007501831,0.006389035,0.009048664,0.0010051563,0.0043667504,0.009758957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005847948,0.00024558668,0.00030758,0.001073718,0.015334056,0.007834622,0.0026108874,0.0053859344,0.0012135601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001243743,0.0000014400314,0.000019765843,0.0000041434578,2.4959832e-7,0.00000868383,0.000234876,0.000037315847,0.0000065681024,0.9909321,0.005605599,0.0031480235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028122656,0.000008873283,0.00017395138,0.000118729564,0.0000010191142,0.00004779655,0.00068764115,0.00025543108,0.0000347915,0.65294707,0.34571645,0.000005463612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007479537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006821755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009758957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005878426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008145829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042651236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210955357","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564","title":"Dimensions of Private Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Tort; Private law; Property (philosophy); Law; Relation (database); Philosophy of law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Comparative law; Computer science; Philosophy; Liability; Data mining","score_opus":0.027447626405022383,"score_gpt":0.24287288078684666,"score_spread":0.21542525438182428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210955357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022921463,0.009445788,0.0115342755,0.024118042,0.0002426507,0.0000614349,0.00014886366,0.000042398387,0.9314852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93147814,0.0076816417,0.007518274,0.0024345864,0.00042447288,0.00018881533,0.00014202125,0.00004253236,0.05008956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964091,0.0013695458,0.00012716754,0.0004442284,0.0012608895,0.0003890584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980716,0.0007840182,0.00020373125,0.00034688917,0.00021621594,0.00037764764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023671857,0.0003746622,0.00033792545,0.0026632992,0.0050208853,0.012903735,0.0005660615,0.0026811515,0.0073731607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003605211,0.0003433771,0.00034334403,0.0027418125,0.043864742,0.014024039,0.006289816,0.004255486,0.0005346745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.9178225e-7,0.0000026984749,0.00006234178,0.000003580528,4.1359294e-7,0.0000033443937,0.0006750432,0.000022951213,0.000011323091,0.9973483,0.00054407754,0.0013251527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032233888,0.0000037526145,0.00041848334,0.000041018837,0.0000013553506,0.00003799111,0.0011759511,0.0001319916,0.000018785238,0.946869,0.051295344,0.0000030193648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005701883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054167174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012903735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010725425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072427713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07781875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211105127","doi":"10.1090/surv/148","title":"Ordering Braids","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Mathematical surveys and monographs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Braid; Mathematics; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.04144003946280374,"score_gpt":0.29742853788056206,"score_spread":0.25598849841775834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211105127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024673326,0.0033644496,0.030036913,0.0017443968,0.00153199,0.000044278386,0.00037223878,0.00026439092,0.9601741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06905201,0.005076465,0.017676735,0.0012103146,0.0010256438,0.00013460733,0.0008360781,0.0004320241,0.904556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994241,0.00012289958,0.000030265604,0.00010359205,0.00024113363,0.00007804564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995882,0.00010792076,0.000019756511,0.00010044223,0.00014042083,0.000043324304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004629748,0.00078819,0.00074087305,0.0022942154,0.002348155,0.003726409,0.00076954294,0.00080085895,0.0564378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001299693,0.00055489177,0.000417895,0.0028469788,0.003049049,0.0054297056,0.0013650365,0.0031175117,0.015165977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034220843,0.000005863316,0.00001544501,0.00001989206,0.0000011098031,0.00000861813,0.0001078772,0.00009685703,0.00010072056,0.94958574,0.031241383,0.018813038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003076651,0.0000047597596,0.000042451975,0.000028313842,0.0000025828217,0.000054392312,0.00006300803,0.0002545591,0.00014542554,0.6914895,0.30790612,0.0000057291472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022769636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035707888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0564378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020295698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015817191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18880326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212915363","doi":"10.1111/raju.12334","title":"Bentham’s Public Utilitarianism and Its Jurisprudential Significance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Morality; Jurisprudence; Jeremy bentham; Law; Philosophy of law; Legislator; Normative; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public law; Legislation","score_opus":0.03822280387896085,"score_gpt":0.31937847158636057,"score_spread":0.28115566770739975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212915363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044537175,0.0062683765,0.081596434,0.11521439,0.0010672628,0.000052183586,0.00007032176,0.00016272023,0.75103116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760029,0.0007306441,0.0037272533,0.0033221375,0.000756027,0.000058305577,0.000019196028,0.000067369525,0.015316222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98357266,0.010222903,0.0004040525,0.0015399827,0.0034758798,0.0007845468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803284,0.013220436,0.0008556142,0.0021218623,0.0028522457,0.0006215501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010553431,0.0004250896,0.0006535916,0.0016677189,0.0054217186,0.010093235,0.0014189307,0.004504724,0.0036750678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016147554,0.0004869639,0.00062229275,0.0012936711,0.045267552,0.0060144328,0.004494655,0.007968174,0.0006778464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001660957,0.0000043803893,0.0000182879,0.0000046206164,0.0000014391255,0.00000863804,0.00045945685,0.00007069685,0.000015815947,0.9981748,0.0005887577,0.0006513206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059701024,0.000004923036,0.00006729388,0.000023297118,0.0000032320718,0.000013659981,0.00019104229,0.00045847526,0.000065467684,0.984139,0.015022593,0.000005076598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047271443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029312144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010553431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008870584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003174733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06436092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212990237","doi":"10.5840/raven20111899","title":"Vaughan, Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Raven A Journal of Vexillology","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.1056067301950386,"score_gpt":0.31558579620793453,"score_spread":0.20997906601289593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212990237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003974869,0.007330668,0.0008086491,0.0021985439,0.0006326275,0.00008306556,0.004240309,0.00038771558,0.9803436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004131211,0.001111946,0.0004226412,0.00016547016,0.000021302269,0.000016389407,0.00044869047,0.0001275332,0.9935548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990716,0.00008379506,0.000041312196,0.00028125453,0.0003211954,0.00020077902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865794,0.00021084763,0.00007183225,0.000140345,0.0006837753,0.00023521438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004756543,0.0013609028,0.00072832004,0.0018232837,0.009330376,0.0050651333,0.0015682165,0.0020953903,0.7173087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022400771,0.0007670866,0.00067843805,0.0033975712,0.0014115484,0.0016585838,0.0019945484,0.0013531632,0.30375513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020568204,0.000057587527,0.0024691662,0.00059514254,0.0000252954,0.00090738665,0.001018861,0.0006603496,0.0013765503,0.029830037,0.6414008,0.32145324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122000865,0.000014647044,0.0020709855,0.00014811101,0.000007956316,0.00016650838,0.00049247727,0.00012451116,0.00026022742,0.0011000349,0.9955889,0.000013359491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56835544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86224824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7173087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008767685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013214457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8683732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213184069","doi":"10.7202/1027042ar","title":"Fruit Salad","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Orthodoxy; Value (mathematics); Property law; Intellectual property; Alienation; Capital (architecture); Civil code; Revenue; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; History; Accounting","score_opus":0.017902855572112127,"score_gpt":0.27672866652437156,"score_spread":0.2588258109522594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213184069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049689203,0.0016970522,0.0009465844,0.0052241567,0.001232345,0.00010226485,0.0029644617,0.0008283496,0.9820358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019678015,0.00065898045,0.0009769639,0.0016546262,0.00028333097,0.00003927197,0.001758068,0.00025503425,0.9746957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950707,0.000041267347,0.000015044946,0.00013735174,0.00021973503,0.00007963187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996125,0.0000492274,0.00002180683,0.00006941196,0.000114382055,0.0001326368],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006043291,0.00039598963,0.0004080412,0.0014207087,0.0034224342,0.0038599537,0.0010819285,0.0014336994,0.43950257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012751124,0.00021628385,0.00053620175,0.0013542308,0.0008883384,0.0027300578,0.0031573377,0.0016846234,0.13243775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019279025,0.00010036197,0.0014868546,0.0001983072,0.000011641598,0.00047379502,0.0007489662,0.00011381267,0.0012299913,0.15638122,0.67859244,0.16046977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005972332,0.000014958971,0.0005333089,0.00001922531,0.0000012766545,0.000059428017,0.00008795381,0.000025140716,0.0001238911,0.002024111,0.9971,0.000004721706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006431816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01596306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43950257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024288923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015436102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7994816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214916966","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/urj6n","title":"The presumption of resulting trust and beneficiary designations: What’s intention go to do with it?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Beneficiary; Estate; Business; Law and economics; Doctrine; Economics; Law; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.0693087129939688,"score_gpt":0.36272540292457156,"score_spread":0.29341668993060277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214916966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16234544,0.012184659,0.036966495,0.32625568,0.00092953787,0.00015899257,0.0003547893,0.00012837896,0.4606761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654254,0.0030948203,0.003819265,0.0141648995,0.00017448247,0.000034917262,0.0000742794,0.00004090437,0.013171111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859372,0.0022903148,0.00060651347,0.00091792876,0.0061707837,0.0040773014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781327,0.010179601,0.002193675,0.0017677495,0.0064147497,0.0013115368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01487871,0.0004261254,0.0006679415,0.0016627216,0.011188662,0.01404236,0.0038265882,0.0073324484,0.004082554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039017655,0.00047066712,0.0012176259,0.0022241517,0.0383603,0.011602654,0.0036148643,0.011031571,0.000681311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012670217,0.000012297366,0.0030903784,0.000045164663,0.000010673729,0.00021484132,0.0060820407,0.00013172887,0.0001067237,0.97874314,0.0033164283,0.00823397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006427355,0.00006624182,0.021844015,0.0015726356,0.0001728668,0.00081083295,0.04279365,0.0019795194,0.0019150375,0.74798644,0.18052968,0.00026493214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7045749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76259625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7045749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03783643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06906539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59432983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223420017","doi":"10.1017/9781009181648.021","title":"Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Achieve Life Sciences (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03060379322728132,"score_gpt":0.26654101504999245,"score_spread":0.23593722182271112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223420017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005751876,0.0029038882,0.0031332606,0.0036385756,0.0050580036,0.00062830345,0.1545842,0.0041904314,0.8252883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015111199,0.003976761,0.001778057,0.001067201,0.0014471571,0.00032422633,0.07487747,0.0016285254,0.91338944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985297,0.00011345594,0.00018694488,0.00018631482,0.00086800294,0.00011556619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939061,0.00084564864,0.00035061507,0.0006409503,0.003537477,0.00071928237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010333759,0.0011932862,0.0012170862,0.0119070755,0.0015926218,0.00567264,0.0015130161,0.0010801649,0.8296749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011288893,0.0004611966,0.0006017467,0.013109372,0.0005239489,0.0046401476,0.0022577485,0.0013481028,0.7878448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014158462,0.000016009923,0.00012515174,0.00032307813,0.0000020627285,0.000018757917,0.00004326804,0.000049338585,0.0001495983,0.0023758907,0.9482967,0.048585888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020054251,0.000006064014,0.0002720315,0.00011635037,0.0000014304599,0.000020504905,0.00002904355,0.000017517481,0.000054878583,0.00081333634,0.9986632,0.0000036107467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006034343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005590039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1703251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002477747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026134157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224095393","doi":"10.1017/9781108290173.017","title":"Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03060379322728132,"score_gpt":0.26654101504999245,"score_spread":0.23593722182271112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224095393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005751876,0.0029038882,0.0031332606,0.0036385756,0.0050580036,0.00062830345,0.1545842,0.0041904314,0.8252883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015111199,0.003976761,0.001778057,0.001067201,0.0014471571,0.00032422633,0.07487747,0.0016285254,0.91338944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985297,0.00011345594,0.00018694488,0.00018631482,0.00086800294,0.00011556619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939061,0.00084564864,0.00035061507,0.0006409503,0.003537477,0.00071928237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010333759,0.0011932862,0.0012170862,0.0119070755,0.0015926218,0.00567264,0.0015130161,0.0010801649,0.8296749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011288893,0.0004611966,0.0006017467,0.013109372,0.0005239489,0.0046401476,0.0022577485,0.0013481028,0.7878448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014158462,0.000016009923,0.00012515174,0.00032307813,0.0000020627285,0.000018757917,0.00004326804,0.000049338585,0.0001495983,0.0023758907,0.9482967,0.048585888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020054251,0.000006064014,0.0002720315,0.00011635037,0.0000014304599,0.000020504905,0.00002904355,0.000017517481,0.000054878583,0.00081333634,0.9986632,0.0000036107467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006034343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005590039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1703251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002477747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026134157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224313367","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.9","title":"Contract as Transfer of Ownership, Even Without Consideration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; sort; Law; Common law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03336708925542781,"score_gpt":0.3160125562178211,"score_spread":0.2826454669623933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224313367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051627465,0.0032535838,0.16867374,0.034129977,0.00063947524,0.00015915626,0.00010367593,0.00014490499,0.741268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583178,0.0007575478,0.010129867,0.0032832867,0.00044494585,0.00025312268,0.000049069928,0.000070176364,0.026694154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984584,0.007417867,0.0006730777,0.001587632,0.004564505,0.0011729061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989296,0.005958342,0.0008315014,0.0016698014,0.0018694791,0.00037477363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009543787,0.00043636851,0.0006443918,0.001526925,0.0048963316,0.009134615,0.001670713,0.009006024,0.006590059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014396423,0.00046548052,0.0009823949,0.001638034,0.042398438,0.014126272,0.005328388,0.00766721,0.0007800366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002281827,0.0000022783172,0.000022887565,0.0000040555096,9.198758e-7,0.000016208864,0.00024679682,0.00008126907,0.00001910472,0.99891317,0.0001907158,0.00050030695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007012457,0.000013561101,0.00007177572,0.000053152773,0.0000046178498,0.000079683254,0.00021646463,0.00092516426,0.00011233003,0.9825289,0.015977778,0.000009499824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062011187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024316334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009543787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008774538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062911273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06366402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229537775","doi":"10.1017/9781139600163.015","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229537775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067971624,0.0034125256,0.0035148074,0.0041369153,0.005373169,0.00068315567,0.1970338,0.004892618,0.78027326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019652748,0.004905053,0.002118683,0.0013185156,0.0017419251,0.0003931039,0.10126406,0.0020383608,0.884255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00012794523,0.00021951071,0.00020674487,0.00092694623,0.00012842308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289554,0.0010078236,0.00042818143,0.0007589567,0.0040751435,0.0008343696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105721,0.0011973418,0.0012027742,0.012569641,0.0016313764,0.0057338527,0.0015747846,0.0010373708,0.8310982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096948,0.0004583511,0.0006089175,0.0136079015,0.0005356659,0.0050358553,0.0024341946,0.0013659052,0.7858275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015260062,0.000016432836,0.00014121928,0.00036377544,0.0000023335094,0.0000198533,0.00005132835,0.0000468786,0.00014983078,0.0023362685,0.94756925,0.049287584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020451168,0.0000060610587,0.00027866635,0.00012563723,0.0000015149944,0.000021140551,0.000032009502,0.00001601091,0.00005685267,0.0008133191,0.998643,0.0000037316534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055967253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053208745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026802043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229666626","doi":"10.21991/cf29371","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada Ryan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Legitimation; De facto; Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014237891509047631,"score_gpt":0.2509128879879251,"score_spread":0.23667499647887746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229666626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0821342,0.009888867,0.010625907,0.16010806,0.00090152177,0.00008976774,0.00035365514,0.000105008985,0.73579305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569208,0.0014591054,0.0019420345,0.006356667,0.00021780294,0.00003246116,0.000059627546,0.00005122779,0.032960325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876667,0.0021428564,0.0002616351,0.0013375476,0.005020503,0.0035707075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99091816,0.0039275694,0.00031715515,0.0006433595,0.0033644014,0.00082929025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009184286,0.00032404638,0.000773155,0.002459834,0.026929345,0.02158644,0.0028406316,0.0087397145,0.00551143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019025594,0.0004818759,0.0004374234,0.0032423814,0.040870737,0.005522575,0.0057333987,0.011793638,0.00032639096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034223588,0.000002591272,0.00021923598,0.0000055059963,0.0000042801403,0.000048804508,0.0027630748,0.00012098047,0.000029067753,0.99001735,0.00477366,0.0020120787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035683748,0.00001035686,0.003351534,0.000247785,0.00005743474,0.000070248745,0.009065613,0.001803216,0.00052499375,0.7149561,0.26975706,0.00011996564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.940161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94840425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10572848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10572848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12624617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7671174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229914185","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2010.21721","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.21801413328612157,"score_gpt":0.36662500854184144,"score_spread":0.14861087525571987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229914185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0158638,0.002543032,0.002313808,0.036122546,0.054964367,0.0008850345,0.0021164494,0.0009868086,0.8842041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030835077,0.0007135129,0.00065649534,0.0026842465,0.0068175327,0.00018404404,0.000656946,0.00015850995,0.9572936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98263735,0.001973002,0.0007041358,0.0009103535,0.008321936,0.0054532625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96980333,0.0015149947,0.0008209278,0.0016770277,0.0067423983,0.019441344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008857878,0.00067493564,0.0016630027,0.0058517023,0.0073154955,0.010418402,0.0027722295,0.004970061,0.21035591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033636656,0.000798886,0.001121044,0.0034787646,0.0013280155,0.0030950238,0.006953525,0.006227923,0.13360174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015331885,0.00033800636,0.0026019092,0.00007479029,0.000014708667,0.00013740725,0.00024707115,0.00011016865,0.00030630612,0.029421631,0.86142904,0.10516574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056846253,0.00016587572,0.0124229025,0.00006383562,0.000013364056,0.00019760113,0.0006898706,0.00029505134,0.00021226029,0.0063664364,0.97947466,0.00004134403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004220122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019071054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21035591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003116728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012353495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7037106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230353734","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u236809","title":"du-Plat-Taylor, Francis Maurice Gustavus, (1878–22 May 1954), JP Surrey; Chairman: Surrey Quarter Sessions Rating Appeals Cttee, 1942; Mortlake (Surrey) Petty Sessions; Arbitrator","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Art; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027564156381949093,"score_gpt":0.3203772560435976,"score_spread":0.29281309966164853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230353734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013242568,0.03850416,0.0004965373,0.06805087,0.018146444,0.00012928112,0.0027840524,0.00027865107,0.87028587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027054045,0.0026477189,0.00007686626,0.0019550628,0.000491164,0.000016938242,0.00012820729,0.000049690625,0.99192894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924684,0.000088721725,0.0000459655,0.00011798934,0.00036887868,0.00013153414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895144,0.00025759568,0.00007156415,0.000036257195,0.00053490844,0.00014816604],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010621405,0.0006785574,0.00058954756,0.0013352304,0.004448815,0.003938648,0.0010134315,0.0035102104,0.26730493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003357427,0.0005496075,0.00024331125,0.001529315,0.0010671152,0.0030686683,0.0013344194,0.0037619916,0.1146726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066717807,0.000001616833,0.00004283364,0.000023717712,4.1604684e-7,0.00003189714,0.00012067533,0.000007824979,0.000018679326,0.002185668,0.99295515,0.0046049384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014429869,0.0000017273125,0.00039004127,0.00003694076,7.1179653e-7,0.000016009735,0.00013725222,0.0000069021767,0.000025163677,0.00024626224,0.9991345,0.0000031184363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13921136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30500898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7326951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005756455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004768974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89422405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230356737","doi":"10.2307/3504968","title":"10.2307/3504968","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Substantive rights; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.011078781760355644,"score_gpt":0.24298436823929986,"score_spread":0.23190558647894421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230356737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033409861,0.00037615877,0.00045206342,0.00032762502,0.0004043812,0.000051448085,0.0009658949,0.0007172078,0.99637103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011545266,0.0003849222,0.0005528251,0.00044359954,0.000107963104,0.000035640976,0.0013695863,0.00040843085,0.99554247],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935967,0.00005720828,0.000052442527,0.00017432611,0.0002578617,0.00009861147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783355,0.00047424366,0.000086387896,0.00041566478,0.00052536034,0.0006647279],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009228658,0.0016322411,0.0011770295,0.002379613,0.0018106728,0.0052402434,0.0019511805,0.002751538,0.9835613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022353216,0.00081350957,0.00080595264,0.0027077226,0.0017725814,0.006114627,0.0043762075,0.0017730616,0.98414606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017088602,0.00015909564,0.00049027416,0.00040089054,0.000015152684,0.00019075544,0.000094495605,0.0001614199,0.0014391557,0.0067767515,0.5678436,0.42225745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022763215,0.00003244862,0.00069506926,0.00017247582,0.0000062432805,0.00021042726,0.000119819546,0.000114320625,0.00020527691,0.0012825329,0.99712425,0.000014375294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039063003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004155855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016438723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011521588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014746309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023447752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230935746","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.687178","title":"The Legal and Extra-Legal Determinants of Expropriation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Business; Law and economics; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.010358406260455814,"score_gpt":0.29343646405189483,"score_spread":0.283078057791439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230935746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143624,0.0007673477,0.0014560742,0.009460396,0.000031897867,0.000043776163,0.0003851452,0.000022080347,0.07347087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597245,0.0001669915,0.00006636333,0.00013508508,0.000047006033,0.00000772711,0.000044913482,0.0000039060365,0.0035556406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971667,0.00087845477,0.00016082873,0.00026367215,0.0004972347,0.0010331093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449015,0.038346775,0.009129913,0.0014342316,0.0025407386,0.0036468126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029534665,0.00012725327,0.00048333924,0.0016224185,0.0014430796,0.004222413,0.00097000424,0.002122751,0.026234653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02682295,0.00024629742,0.00046446733,0.001446217,0.0030874617,0.0038391831,0.0022604084,0.003054529,0.001265393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031269412,0.0011191004,0.7002394,0.00010481405,0.00012923282,0.0016226247,0.0022503135,0.004272887,0.0004037544,0.2589749,0.0053197555,0.025250476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077259494,0.00021506722,0.8089156,0.00010473916,0.00017151643,0.000673122,0.008198839,0.009117143,0.0004613166,0.16001265,0.0119900955,0.0000625029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010950536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01960649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026234653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001546633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023495918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08776367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231034483","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190923068.003.0010","title":"Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Restitution; Political science; Immovable property; Law; World War II; Property (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.02550461794556153,"score_gpt":0.21911123230436177,"score_spread":0.19360661435880025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231034483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040453926,0.002817055,0.0003776183,0.0041754134,0.00061677163,0.000028914246,0.003929091,0.00028122007,0.9873695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002309624,0.001532945,0.00045387505,0.0009782375,0.000034629196,0.0000121381045,0.0011554117,0.00011651119,0.9934068],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895084,0.0000386315,0.000027050271,0.00018894771,0.0005818984,0.00021272142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983834,0.00007613734,0.000042044063,0.00008646641,0.0011772712,0.00023462689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039856497,0.00081395154,0.0005071196,0.0017938842,0.0070625586,0.0071330126,0.0014497049,0.002801332,0.4581195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001696631,0.0005032523,0.0004787089,0.0036200907,0.0012187533,0.0022155282,0.0018743486,0.0020316744,0.15977734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023475046,0.000012299839,0.00029518543,0.0001782395,0.00000477835,0.0001933932,0.00025326927,0.000102021724,0.00021270293,0.060572583,0.87135094,0.06680109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014560961,0.0000010429101,0.00013381492,0.000040874536,0.0000011361933,0.000028393595,0.00006805024,0.000016851054,0.00004331877,0.0006671337,0.9989945,0.000003390307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86184037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9437931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4581195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028541932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045707766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231164726","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2008.20056","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Nursing; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3816856800491292,"score_gpt":0.363145421978042,"score_spread":0.018540258071087168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231164726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014869239,0.002466099,0.0021768727,0.03586724,0.05187983,0.0008124293,0.0019643605,0.0009324325,0.8890315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0296595,0.00069019245,0.0006270373,0.0027715925,0.0064411936,0.00017251637,0.0006308563,0.00015379934,0.95885324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825723,0.0019428545,0.0006943696,0.0009232823,0.008417644,0.005449512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97059095,0.0014961584,0.0008167984,0.0016392018,0.006676431,0.018780548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00886933,0.000667028,0.0016619421,0.0058633815,0.007531973,0.010667351,0.002761269,0.004985062,0.21261941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03372979,0.00079976954,0.0011014668,0.0034710567,0.001347857,0.0031626597,0.0070184222,0.0063056666,0.13434125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013656124,0.0003173161,0.0024977382,0.000069336136,0.000013762778,0.00012695968,0.00024397734,0.00010171226,0.0002753834,0.030534938,0.86448634,0.10119601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052843345,0.00015648801,0.0118445745,0.0000642043,0.000013008315,0.00018748784,0.00069224986,0.0002832978,0.00020316707,0.006654823,0.97980773,0.000040135477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004352248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01941632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21261941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031745925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01232794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7112828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231214153","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_323","title":"The Charles Wallace Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"History; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02869731504642411,"score_gpt":0.28123639886206797,"score_spread":0.2525390838156439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231214153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006187057,0.0069158925,0.00054125744,0.012409864,0.0027593456,0.000025302854,0.0005012778,0.0001685229,0.97605985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015785721,0.0010821549,0.00016259267,0.0005380138,0.000058778427,0.0000056156478,0.0000704816,0.00005579585,0.99644804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989427,0.00007759942,0.000025960942,0.0001546114,0.00061540277,0.00018377851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887997,0.00008624097,0.000040878695,0.00009264781,0.00055933493,0.00034102786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066838216,0.00059188856,0.00036875377,0.0012978844,0.004410643,0.0061393077,0.0007191885,0.002179737,0.24296951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026557776,0.0003770183,0.00030553996,0.001239963,0.0014373774,0.0021351124,0.0022667118,0.0031643633,0.0881141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011060524,0.000008867976,0.00013556493,0.000049980103,0.0000027828398,0.000090577574,0.00019904587,0.000062117426,0.00008357219,0.0768915,0.8467999,0.07566505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.228662e-7,9.177386e-7,0.000077057026,0.00003217789,4.6142745e-7,0.000014433821,0.000039684783,0.000010767506,0.000017159495,0.0011653939,0.99863976,0.0000016217729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24067755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49107984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24296951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008524746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016480763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.812814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231438252","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah13029","title":"<i>Bona fides</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fides; Meaning (existential); Term (time); Property (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02167179769491176,"score_gpt":0.2624927503718462,"score_spread":0.24082095267693446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231438252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017768211,0.0042725834,0.0010054887,0.004378683,0.0018770541,0.000019804373,0.0007997445,0.00013576777,0.985734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.093947366,0.006962484,0.0020330795,0.0034577271,0.0015869135,0.000088850145,0.0013713501,0.0004918638,0.89006037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929404,0.00015083347,0.000030752584,0.00010936604,0.00030606808,0.000108983404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952424,0.000105609746,0.000061861065,0.000054785643,0.00019096155,0.00006257015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059644703,0.0004367951,0.00028333312,0.0019148126,0.003100052,0.0042903237,0.0006298528,0.0010841644,0.08754704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016470851,0.00015864968,0.00017709873,0.0026726082,0.0020352653,0.0024505288,0.0015682598,0.0018155487,0.026095921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039499377,0.000014681417,0.0002862758,0.00025557654,0.0000029463085,0.00015859425,0.001797644,0.00006489159,0.00035086356,0.39435357,0.53128916,0.07138632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.781926e-7,0.0000026087314,0.00022410911,0.00009772338,7.374704e-7,0.000101545804,0.00014788276,0.0000148880445,0.0000892942,0.0026593865,0.9966574,0.0000036479641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015490145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020011177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08754704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029291972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014757224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29287398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231809392","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2004.tb01869.x","title":"Cabinet secrecy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Secrecy; Statute; Convention; Cabinet (room); Engineering","score_opus":0.033473007880166834,"score_gpt":0.30596614128432104,"score_spread":0.2724931334041542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231809392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002965014,0.0019202995,0.0033291655,0.007288124,0.0014677856,0.000114954775,0.0017155324,0.000721514,0.9804776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042141646,0.0019433153,0.0015177907,0.0023165816,0.00043418552,0.000084689564,0.0016524338,0.00038302544,0.94952637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965881,0.00044481526,0.00027377057,0.00046165308,0.0014439557,0.0007877658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939063,0.0010980212,0.00039049695,0.0011207974,0.0027928604,0.00069150236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002541845,0.00063079054,0.0004128617,0.0017189491,0.007358427,0.006895797,0.0015149754,0.0029169244,0.2326918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00810505,0.00054891617,0.00039388955,0.002983782,0.002287318,0.0042436216,0.0041346042,0.0030533604,0.10125635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007367033,0.000020008998,0.00082302885,0.00028770848,0.000006117894,0.0005362098,0.002808941,0.00020868424,0.0005418056,0.3739316,0.54757494,0.073187344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033914412,0.000003745465,0.00017792563,0.0000610593,0.0000022598504,0.00011047105,0.00020114312,0.00004975746,0.00029584178,0.0026427198,0.99644524,0.000006482034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05565961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07877676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9443404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00778589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015020525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7784316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231976445","doi":"10.1017/9781316827437.038","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231976445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005877453,0.0031577419,0.0030817478,0.0041016913,0.005553604,0.00065334,0.15362518,0.004249739,0.82498926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015039016,0.004258822,0.0016853928,0.0011609752,0.0015165124,0.00032603653,0.073369786,0.0015416011,0.9146369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841595,0.000120547295,0.00020768664,0.00019426063,0.0009355097,0.0001260683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933428,0.00090859545,0.00039913075,0.00067995966,0.0038834116,0.00078597927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010953592,0.0011942402,0.0012227264,0.012263203,0.0016543808,0.0059659677,0.0015484802,0.0011332715,0.8323261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012299077,0.00045928947,0.000613585,0.013348152,0.0005564173,0.0047791805,0.002389161,0.0014220773,0.7882756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014081803,0.000015984584,0.000123689,0.00033318947,0.0000020358586,0.000018811932,0.00004376463,0.000045739143,0.00014314182,0.0023310215,0.9485637,0.048364803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020589027,0.0000061895485,0.00027169485,0.00012683094,0.000001433871,0.000020854277,0.000029980423,0.000016632726,0.00005402022,0.0007904528,0.998676,0.000003797603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006291428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005858772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16767389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026352748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030070022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232265458","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_391","title":"Stewardship, Concept of","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Political science","score_opus":0.03474829711382935,"score_gpt":0.3039051032337066,"score_spread":0.26915680611987725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232265458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015911344,0.03594008,0.020172529,0.012553344,0.0011648029,0.000039958675,0.00004759659,0.000045092263,0.92844546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2860745,0.04714633,0.025258288,0.011263769,0.005209009,0.0004797565,0.00017942722,0.00024686425,0.6241421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787235,0.00077647134,0.00009145574,0.00033381413,0.00076781976,0.00015804335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910814,0.00045474496,0.00007707442,0.00014229413,0.00015290936,0.00006480959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026195904,0.0008492683,0.00056683976,0.0018604632,0.0022523326,0.0074246502,0.0015391888,0.0038183355,0.009302526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003209839,0.0003951649,0.00031414072,0.002028608,0.016453678,0.009175321,0.0025059686,0.0048693605,0.0022126106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.509089e-7,0.000004158164,0.000008327768,0.000016034124,5.7589807e-7,0.0000038823127,0.00012708054,0.0000397049,0.000014994458,0.99193716,0.0049358564,0.0029116804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017080191,0.0000034744144,0.00005828121,0.00010913947,0.0000012596521,0.000030946037,0.00012169317,0.00014698427,0.000041832387,0.8611755,0.13830571,0.0000034720724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028267966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004141999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009302526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041753626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042694667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031120062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232856949","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1002941","title":"Delegated Contracting","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.014181106994697268,"score_gpt":0.3224334410791927,"score_spread":0.3082523340844954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232856949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015288314,0.0006663697,0.1216112,0.0045968634,0.0004920846,0.00034730943,0.00048554988,0.00032924864,0.8561831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53865427,0.0008361019,0.028175687,0.0023306706,0.0005356581,0.000756016,0.00044033033,0.00021796953,0.42805338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888693,0.0040388843,0.0006426277,0.0016324692,0.0031934925,0.0016233514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026614,0.0034592748,0.00052245596,0.0038645044,0.0013298324,0.0005577308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070310747,0.0007672375,0.0016455202,0.0016028174,0.0032671012,0.0056653423,0.0030114541,0.00391564,0.07002849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023667471,0.00067400874,0.0013935327,0.0020880417,0.0032547598,0.0069879647,0.004534011,0.004895677,0.009838246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031281153,0.000055563913,0.0001405434,0.000045909463,0.000012398008,0.00004388983,0.00016114855,0.00056934956,0.000088846784,0.9770726,0.008787198,0.012991225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040962077,0.000026257267,0.00028541475,0.000066624874,0.00001835323,0.00022694956,0.00010711089,0.0047474294,0.00028049768,0.9474436,0.04674263,0.000014238913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001766036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015484337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07002849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026720427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038131026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2342686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233245300","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt21pxjkw.9","title":"Prizemaking and the Vice-Admiralty Court at Halifax","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Liverpool University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science","score_opus":0.04186810190236449,"score_gpt":0.25757882428115075,"score_spread":0.21571072237878627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233245300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013821975,0.0057786265,0.00059716287,0.03880064,0.0011418915,0.00003787613,0.00006954053,0.00003883673,0.93971336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20831493,0.0009815234,0.00025834877,0.0064226547,0.00016735078,0.000049744933,0.000020483634,0.00004148176,0.78374356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644876,0.001069124,0.000064256266,0.00032765305,0.00055179786,0.0015383747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987821,0.00054201344,0.000051349965,0.00006710302,0.00023893223,0.00031846954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030563953,0.0008088509,0.000719415,0.0010465517,0.03079205,0.020514581,0.0017672529,0.011692431,0.02461942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055335537,0.0006482867,0.0004204772,0.0010570735,0.013076267,0.004643587,0.0043769493,0.011172715,0.002349422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005709064,0.000025063755,0.00026915438,0.000029780813,0.0000068660606,0.00030617285,0.004095354,0.00025909388,0.00007192891,0.8842154,0.1010879,0.009576155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042620668,0.000035834557,0.0018423563,0.00035689728,0.000015057996,0.00019220509,0.014529408,0.00065216527,0.00039504137,0.16576017,0.8161017,0.00007666433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45508918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67617595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5449108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032328203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025600482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9048805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233389050","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16314","title":"<i>Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd.</i> <i>[2011] M.J. No. 305; 2011 MBQB 225, 2011 MB.C. LEXIS 845 (Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, September 16, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Lexis; General partnership; Art; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0326076102925209,"score_gpt":0.2605759400749266,"score_spread":0.22796832978240572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233389050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010006438,0.005275356,0.0008330785,0.043021746,0.00093330175,0.00022242295,0.003081293,0.0002231347,0.9364032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06598325,0.002720198,0.0008407531,0.064795695,0.00016221717,0.00025903698,0.0009623864,0.00007454617,0.8642019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985738,0.00015153707,0.000046779845,0.00012740844,0.0006087372,0.0004917669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817395,0.00043453116,0.000114243376,0.00006211102,0.0009956604,0.00021954766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013489011,0.0006987223,0.00026980232,0.0016292459,0.0116410395,0.0052837864,0.001992742,0.005550483,0.035477567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034016052,0.0009910219,0.0005776676,0.0020459353,0.0018164781,0.00173061,0.0012089913,0.0032410028,0.008109402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044229375,0.000035461195,0.0029408124,0.00014554862,0.000018083225,0.000320638,0.0014798457,0.0001254094,0.00043125375,0.10145102,0.8823798,0.010627864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031059924,0.00003151071,0.012501535,0.00030911306,0.00003644825,0.00013596869,0.0017975884,0.00029926,0.00078713364,0.0030885774,0.98093224,0.000049586022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.855674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9647391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14432597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014416605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035471197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2903518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233693554","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u166009","title":"Kershaw, His Honour Philip Charles Stones, (9 April 1910–1 July 1986), a Circuit Judge (formerly Deputy Chairman, Lancashire Quarter Sessions), 1961–83, retired","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Art; History; Management; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04705074056876273,"score_gpt":0.3112875950530346,"score_spread":0.26423685448427187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233693554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016229772,0.01115632,0.00040519194,0.13436985,0.013799623,0.00013346854,0.0017070569,0.00035154482,0.8364541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025300581,0.001014599,0.00007691801,0.007098038,0.00031257738,0.000017032447,0.000091177826,0.00006461709,0.9887949],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766445,0.00018425258,0.00014990117,0.00038450747,0.001045435,0.00057157635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964651,0.0006214094,0.00017420953,0.00017631955,0.0019940638,0.0005687853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019017926,0.00070578384,0.00069789175,0.0013145274,0.009176587,0.006612213,0.001540042,0.0087753,0.18860234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00759747,0.0008310621,0.0004548545,0.0012953554,0.0018618495,0.0036066864,0.0020484086,0.008417601,0.122466065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008182915,0.000003829159,0.0000761986,0.000022636626,8.135438e-7,0.00005330072,0.000100406,0.000009284287,0.000034261844,0.0057704304,0.99012214,0.003798491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033909782,0.0000031915317,0.00039149626,0.00004881102,0.000001647474,0.000030852265,0.00017623062,0.000009919284,0.000064534965,0.00044893485,0.99881315,0.000007945506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24874616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52866507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24874616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009320323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013620824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6309377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233698800","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v20i1.74","title":"CIVIL LITIGATION NEGLIGENCE AND THE MALAYSIAN ADVOCATE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Sanctions; Duty; Common law; Political science; Liability; Duty of care; Presentation (obstetrics); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.018738665033643548,"score_gpt":0.29930311454728165,"score_spread":0.2805644495136381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233698800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11480933,0.027683755,0.0015510861,0.3502637,0.0018403556,0.000034540677,0.00001434847,0.00002240991,0.5037804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077969,0.004685032,0.00056039135,0.042319722,0.00066810456,0.00002161283,0.0000041163535,0.00000954941,0.04393456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521697,0.002153262,0.00016277631,0.00036705585,0.0011278606,0.00097202364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972579,0.0011742003,0.0005115729,0.00012652745,0.00036773636,0.0005621643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004479851,0.00022198056,0.00018295583,0.0007623142,0.008807016,0.007126083,0.00089419936,0.0062372824,0.002592154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00768728,0.00030667754,0.00023952832,0.0004975285,0.0144217955,0.0038472232,0.004216677,0.007491632,0.0005977523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014653607,0.00002507885,0.0021726147,0.000051522,0.0000037255627,0.0011085498,0.022606252,0.00009457323,0.0001407822,0.9465726,0.015017586,0.012192089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030070712,0.00011840843,0.0071556815,0.0011687173,0.000025516569,0.0063223597,0.027501678,0.000921521,0.0005764993,0.20439842,0.7517074,0.00007372002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010601054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024046237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010601054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067047747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007990995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048646808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233815719","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107360624.020","title":"NEWFOUNDLAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03083185535629933,"score_gpt":0.2394905252316804,"score_spread":0.20865866987538106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233815719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004305059,0.0068568443,0.0005006841,0.0014643951,0.00063786306,0.000022268621,0.0033660776,0.00023266216,0.98648876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000678455,0.0020161178,0.00024258389,0.00017524161,0.00002345447,0.000008294766,0.0006089504,0.000116369934,0.99613047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994299,0.000029982517,0.000026025127,0.00014274764,0.00025515954,0.00011622858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992218,0.0001241165,0.000052857078,0.00012654265,0.00032234786,0.00015234727],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045544788,0.0009407677,0.0007590718,0.0021596055,0.0023897896,0.005833005,0.0010714614,0.0014923776,0.66887885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014337923,0.0005726713,0.0004198894,0.0047172005,0.00092852855,0.0036276989,0.0023145138,0.0019705635,0.36900064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038113772,0.0000320702,0.00030301567,0.00030482165,0.0000062489353,0.000255388,0.00021539077,0.00016472524,0.00052996003,0.026509348,0.7443126,0.22732832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012902328,0.0000025306215,0.00027568865,0.00008446164,0.0000010753489,0.000046859765,0.00005279756,0.000014194154,0.00006604852,0.00045339603,0.99899846,0.0000032671935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13540335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39826864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86459666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005711675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005777019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4723041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233971077","doi":"10.35940/ijrte.b2846.078219","title":"Doctrine of Pleasure in major Common law Countries: Interpretation &amp; Correlation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Doctrine; Law; Common law; Constitution; Political science; Power (physics); Psychology","score_opus":0.007795037656164979,"score_gpt":0.2770343065031287,"score_spread":0.26923926884696375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233971077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92146647,0.00087450637,0.0018148331,0.00058557466,0.000038966467,0.000098553624,0.00061090477,0.000010322192,0.0744998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906033,0.00010843237,0.00025707253,0.000022934966,0.000007796669,0.000016787168,0.0001260543,0.0000028644454,0.0003977786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99315214,0.0033102934,0.00046144932,0.000666225,0.0013270724,0.0010827773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953944,0.0307936,0.0078099873,0.0020518992,0.0038495578,0.0015509871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004330768,0.00016429837,0.0003859133,0.007138857,0.0011644557,0.0048794677,0.0005657328,0.00036981257,0.009297381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029264113,0.00012581889,0.0004762425,0.012073425,0.0046833446,0.0018160744,0.0036827247,0.0016018952,0.0005631984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019340948,0.00012763192,0.8388985,0.00016268439,0.00012667917,0.00070429186,0.018756647,0.0005345124,0.00023788934,0.11180299,0.0020074842,0.026447304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023131684,0.00013628633,0.8830093,0.00033002187,0.00010630705,0.00063089724,0.07610596,0.002017538,0.00041009206,0.022843923,0.0143486215,0.000037896345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006864971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004295499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009297381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017662487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021958663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031102777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233971825","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.61","title":"THE VERY IDEA OF A JUDGE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Skepticism; Order (exchange); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.009444938411722052,"score_gpt":0.2465539911978685,"score_spread":0.23710905278614644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233971825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01273343,0.0072236657,0.038471382,0.20199169,0.003479148,0.000100830395,0.00012453932,0.00012342552,0.7357519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8303897,0.003200857,0.01118782,0.043478794,0.0022080184,0.00021708939,0.00010063968,0.00012958364,0.109087534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99177307,0.0038931817,0.0002928371,0.0016332767,0.0015148199,0.00089274376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581015,0.0018244977,0.00033312142,0.0004435538,0.0007174654,0.0008712584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00663965,0.00037228316,0.00045950865,0.0012670212,0.005855221,0.009748805,0.0016022887,0.0073113833,0.006069969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011212015,0.00044429692,0.00040095,0.00082179136,0.039821096,0.011302814,0.0041284105,0.008405006,0.0021005634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031700918,0.0000024118997,0.000065161454,0.0000073393653,0.0000010731183,0.00001851084,0.0016685494,0.000021307249,0.00003402698,0.9912976,0.005557478,0.0013234048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017833283,0.000022495491,0.0001763148,0.00010445768,0.000006928897,0.00012591714,0.0024399187,0.00028242142,0.00011814535,0.6529033,0.34378314,0.000019175906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062767183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004604768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009748805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050885803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056231203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03692043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234672108","doi":"10.1016/s0887-7963(03)90000-9","title":"The application of the precautionary principle to the blood system: The Canadian Blood System's vCJD donor deferral policy*1","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Deferral; Economic shortage; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Dilemma; Public economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Finance","score_opus":0.033397157514249605,"score_gpt":0.32953314973930087,"score_spread":0.29613599222505127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234672108","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017029818,0.024104074,0.0043296604,0.70161283,0.0042339563,0.000112081674,0.0005079362,0.00009010861,0.2479795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5421037,0.020170584,0.013849621,0.30322793,0.0035306404,0.00012018609,0.00025368793,0.00010985888,0.1166338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98120695,0.002169967,0.00047787032,0.0010062285,0.011040552,0.004098492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98515236,0.0048951325,0.00057130284,0.00040198458,0.0071295826,0.0018495144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012819892,0.0006167952,0.0006712058,0.0032441127,0.014589796,0.009009446,0.004157979,0.014871849,0.0058313655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026842222,0.000749469,0.0008417042,0.0029308312,0.0149777755,0.0024129695,0.0028185893,0.010997834,0.00031293102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028690487,0.000035876074,0.001950662,0.00014179699,0.000020169153,0.00019448581,0.00262858,0.0008189458,0.00025048509,0.7938216,0.17144199,0.028666763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070160546,0.000054934833,0.011660434,0.001106682,0.00011330127,0.00028723356,0.003066719,0.0017974011,0.0006893412,0.101451695,0.8794803,0.00022177705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09838277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32201195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71382034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234864137","doi":"10.3138/9781442606401-002","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03278393828229341,"score_gpt":0.25565243397280696,"score_spread":0.22286849569051354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234864137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003962623,0.010729427,0.033134114,0.22730568,0.19000004,0.002124806,0.16177575,0.009557671,0.36140984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0362797,0.007088329,0.031058831,0.10393566,0.025127182,0.0046543693,0.1110773,0.01026263,0.67051595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900449,0.0024627692,0.00076194585,0.0014305797,0.004727527,0.0005722962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9369726,0.010480523,0.002193025,0.0051360317,0.03814057,0.007077298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007080497,0.0011515756,0.0016158674,0.0030191606,0.0024488114,0.0047119735,0.0029005518,0.0017499011,0.45609754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07404791,0.0003971616,0.00078234356,0.0026856088,0.0012095199,0.0029601553,0.0055199806,0.004090305,0.34486693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004159354,0.000010312979,0.00029799916,0.00017999891,0.0000058807213,0.00010998759,0.00034938272,0.000044032746,0.00018253051,0.0032748338,0.9769672,0.018536134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013696149,0.000009270301,0.00057050784,0.00022631032,0.000005795798,0.00016319622,0.000519343,0.000061946615,0.000093361734,0.002392747,0.99593323,0.000010617187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043186843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047562155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54390246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035158445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006664668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77581084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234970766","doi":"10.1016/s1041-7060(05)11015-3","title":"List of Contributors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in public interest accounting","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Stakeholder; Accounting; Corporate communication; Public relations; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.03730792600936155,"score_gpt":0.32971338181483356,"score_spread":0.292405455805472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234970766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007121928,0.012524542,0.002701415,0.023436425,0.14428218,0.001031909,0.024868114,0.0039533167,0.78649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014562254,0.0043084878,0.0010112044,0.003002795,0.007373242,0.00033209883,0.009151463,0.00105235,0.9723121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964874,0.00039387256,0.00028349913,0.0006222183,0.0018682319,0.00034474413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848355,0.0009547063,0.00048749373,0.0013861523,0.010162238,0.0021739388],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025448084,0.001727319,0.0017668515,0.0077796974,0.0037570016,0.012457951,0.0031208466,0.0033246567,0.7522074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016385594,0.0006236212,0.0010776324,0.007298662,0.00073962234,0.0070646848,0.0043471674,0.0027043393,0.74075127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005002296,0.00000562471,0.000051571427,0.0001233061,0.0000012950978,0.000017280525,0.000029389697,0.0000119147235,0.00005055538,0.00087060116,0.971894,0.026939327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016702867,0.0000043861055,0.0001161635,0.0001324898,0.0000014113166,0.000026795304,0.000049292186,0.00001403337,0.000026391606,0.00028904728,0.9993344,0.000003871588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003461668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004776446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2477926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029098769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005133137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35344607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235095265","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748697748.001.0001","title":"Trusts and Patrimonies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Appropriation; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Comparative law; Common law; Political science; Trust law; Public law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04031649753995196,"score_gpt":0.26182868723374786,"score_spread":0.2215121896937959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235095265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014064757,0.015055925,0.006700152,0.014704132,0.00043703002,0.000016295186,0.000035974535,0.0000530816,0.94893265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7974552,0.00911739,0.0017405276,0.0015515283,0.00036340684,0.000034931716,0.00003548337,0.000056836197,0.18964477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785066,0.0008973172,0.00007044067,0.00019339907,0.00069569936,0.00029247566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863344,0.0007185532,0.00014766882,0.00018424376,0.00016684135,0.00014931704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016216317,0.00034690998,0.00035237783,0.001062193,0.004194053,0.0071633956,0.00057886116,0.0016526963,0.006731072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043297173,0.0002810822,0.00025034806,0.0013825874,0.027654888,0.008239327,0.0031268427,0.0029593601,0.0010353792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001988764,0.0000021258413,0.000042473264,0.000009726311,9.40731e-7,0.000021241482,0.0029880796,0.00004999674,0.000015711481,0.99010944,0.0030701656,0.0036881042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005554591,0.000012187007,0.00046714483,0.00019451109,0.000004464397,0.00013291575,0.0047765966,0.00030678936,0.00008913675,0.7233981,0.27060348,0.000009197692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008670304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009621144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008670304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069747614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034615395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050605655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235363811","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v11i1.10724","title":"Galambos v Perez, its Critics, and the Equity-Certainty Paradox in Fiduciary Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Fiduciary; Equity (law); Post hoc; Supreme court; Law and economics; Certainty; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Duty; Medicine","score_opus":0.09636965377138822,"score_gpt":0.4299462558601999,"score_spread":0.3335766020888117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235363811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08273813,0.014606186,0.017134918,0.3561245,0.0008445619,0.000055228877,0.0001175667,0.000090890964,0.52828795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623995,0.0017103538,0.0014757366,0.022590682,0.00032209928,0.000030356625,0.000015733212,0.000032509968,0.011423027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934629,0.0017001429,0.00014901727,0.000743728,0.0029724631,0.0009717713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99195683,0.004356294,0.0006238108,0.0006074234,0.0018044676,0.0006511872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007401889,0.00030549508,0.00052420923,0.0020580208,0.009930444,0.007987767,0.0021038183,0.006894413,0.0020137785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021967787,0.00028477822,0.00034814014,0.0019610901,0.041502696,0.0043097804,0.0040926384,0.009564773,0.0002071909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031325083,0.0000016239479,0.00017916677,0.0000064320398,0.0000017043192,0.000022475217,0.0007450506,0.000076904274,0.000013945786,0.9941948,0.0027263726,0.002028326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000203321,0.000010003969,0.0015596909,0.00020892467,0.000018665862,0.00009048384,0.0020895498,0.0006920694,0.00025279188,0.892609,0.10240711,0.00004144023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39596123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33897847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39596123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023319254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02125902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.787313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235642073","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-56632-7_12","title":"Structured Settlements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Personal injury; Settlement (finance); Meaning (existential); Compensation (psychology); Payment; Human settlement; Forensic engineering; Business; Actuarial science; Psychology; Law; History; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering; Archaeology; Finance; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.023923909133375453,"score_gpt":0.27946559414835853,"score_spread":0.2555416850149831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235642073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017011693,0.00079202844,0.035037383,0.0016232284,0.00059373525,0.00030335083,0.00044274805,0.0003037303,0.95920265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073278256,0.0015551758,0.023917839,0.0010012564,0.00036494146,0.0005369446,0.000937598,0.00036673158,0.8980412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605066,0.0010640052,0.00028055924,0.0006932408,0.0014450679,0.00046645917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975963,0.00065408606,0.00015929824,0.00063355366,0.0007385208,0.00021817656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00318469,0.00078464655,0.00069465523,0.0018884346,0.0036789493,0.007707596,0.0027055126,0.0032556944,0.14806694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008462098,0.00061846786,0.00093036797,0.002498802,0.00489612,0.007242367,0.0061942814,0.003067561,0.038499776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073691986,0.000011612297,0.000037468515,0.000033399036,0.000002147549,0.00004662156,0.00038987276,0.00032348107,0.000060166494,0.95090586,0.032398235,0.015783848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015832871,0.000022408794,0.000089609624,0.00017018207,0.000003707262,0.00011633055,0.00034459107,0.0006762751,0.0001624708,0.31457844,0.68380827,0.000011941924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030595919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00426259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14806694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038146388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039850343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49533325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235794566","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u235053","title":"Briant, His Honour Judge Bruce Edgar Dutton, (31 July 1895–15 Aug. 1959), QC 1953; Judge of County Courts, Circuit No. 50 (Sussex), since 1954; Deputy-Chairman West Sussex Quarter Sessions since 1953","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; History; West Yorkshire; Management; Operations research; Political science; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027522549846202334,"score_gpt":0.29788891201040385,"score_spread":0.2703663621642015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235794566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074642565,0.009817122,0.00065071566,0.04207497,0.011269837,0.0001332679,0.002516651,0.00021200159,0.93257904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031377473,0.0014496521,0.00012902901,0.0050013447,0.0004240684,0.000030509838,0.00018723044,0.00006869246,0.9895717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974032,0.0002823385,0.00012973005,0.00039316824,0.0013193253,0.00047221017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974101,0.00039955528,0.000108100685,0.00007713776,0.001718398,0.00028673362],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013014321,0.00071696274,0.0006841844,0.0015893922,0.009763035,0.005023833,0.0014840651,0.005577076,0.204106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005145329,0.00067797594,0.00040570024,0.0016621983,0.001718545,0.0025768983,0.0015569659,0.0065955464,0.08803351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052267064,0.0000023316231,0.00006613698,0.000021377262,5.8334683e-7,0.000037400227,0.00013383424,0.000009111479,0.00002793566,0.00584731,0.990445,0.0034036222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021538838,0.0000020476596,0.0003229295,0.000049777253,0.0000010750215,0.000026504458,0.00013692121,0.000009877477,0.00005043135,0.00045863277,0.9989343,0.0000052545706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37110263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62669253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.795894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010852989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011067833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7378851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235797826","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-95988-4_236","title":"Canon Collins Trust","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Camargo Foundation; Government of Canada; Canadian Blood Services; Canada Council for the Arts; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Canon; Art; Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.036758557685698745,"score_gpt":0.27928948717668856,"score_spread":0.2425309294909898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235797826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001900232,0.0051984796,0.0008625557,0.003534332,0.0013246599,0.00004691045,0.0016947724,0.0009670659,0.9861812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00062450004,0.002169487,0.00041681092,0.00042211826,0.000060451464,0.000023795248,0.0005774145,0.00043087237,0.9952744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847025,0.00016588063,0.000111924055,0.00046377297,0.00065583293,0.00013231389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966731,0.00046528562,0.00016895516,0.0004894968,0.0016226897,0.0005804446],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094732386,0.0017894326,0.0012027326,0.0026022124,0.0031792661,0.009540803,0.0017069961,0.0032367983,0.76430875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039436305,0.0009703966,0.00054179697,0.004959225,0.0014206418,0.005324053,0.003138423,0.0035687946,0.6642913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002691368,0.000020544892,0.00011112419,0.00021201052,0.000003408637,0.0001653623,0.00019786558,0.00009294952,0.00017576925,0.022368832,0.8868208,0.089804426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017925006,0.000002449595,0.00006841804,0.00010101256,6.523715e-7,0.00003672506,0.00006143672,0.000015504893,0.00004076982,0.0006875326,0.99898046,0.0000031126822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022836557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056793526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76430875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038554093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057228263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33618492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235865919","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009807","title":"Rosanna L. Langer Defining Rights and Wrongs: Bureaucracy, Human Rights, and Public Accountability. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2007, 191 p.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Research Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Accountability; Political science; Human rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01886601769549185,"score_gpt":0.2806696273508276,"score_spread":0.2618036096553358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235865919","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046100156,0.7555756,0.0018473691,0.1701331,0.0047533587,0.000025642812,0.0003015677,0.00010308432,0.06679929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03329893,0.68223685,0.004702007,0.044240255,0.0067923674,0.000115339935,0.00032312796,0.00039103001,0.22790012],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988098,0.00040145605,0.00010100659,0.0001579416,0.00043761637,0.00009219903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960109,0.0026179259,0.00025026358,0.00009423513,0.0007901468,0.000236441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018644602,0.001640579,0.0007797093,0.0038544445,0.004239797,0.0056156437,0.0016659827,0.006206616,0.023304109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047608903,0.0011686689,0.00037764423,0.0047059865,0.0058594826,0.01155083,0.001598496,0.007505841,0.008347513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013471858,0.000016244336,0.00012697959,0.00027785936,0.000005665071,0.000054990265,0.0012921698,0.00006412236,0.00006156867,0.07240052,0.8907843,0.034902114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000078072035,0.0000060701113,0.0010975165,0.0012657818,0.000006932344,0.0001570434,0.0018653785,0.00009247006,0.00016059901,0.05645104,0.9388641,0.000025177722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06414336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17480305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93585664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005344189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070203035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12753999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236391300","doi":"10.7202/1021950ar","title":"Areas of Proof in a Discharge Case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Dismissal; Punishment (psychology); Law; Management; Political science; Law and economics; Engineering; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031918708454933845,"score_gpt":0.30292678564381326,"score_spread":0.2710080771888794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236391300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09223323,0.00943754,0.057085384,0.15140206,0.0045074634,0.0011628653,0.00032059138,0.0002736137,0.68357724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.895862,0.0030441734,0.015172641,0.025452666,0.0030240745,0.0008781795,0.00023381354,0.000121744844,0.05621063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9489883,0.018147027,0.0040201587,0.0037445168,0.016004626,0.00909542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9023791,0.06632436,0.0062382217,0.0051246476,0.011404376,0.008529338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03713232,0.0008360788,0.0014343159,0.0043890867,0.013438348,0.017234368,0.004075588,0.025757903,0.014445034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12227145,0.0011846151,0.0018719897,0.0026325465,0.020535612,0.015088755,0.020285703,0.018952645,0.0026623686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008400399,0.00013796434,0.002802298,0.00014813006,0.00002454928,0.012954284,0.0035643163,0.0005594978,0.0003671947,0.93820006,0.023376893,0.017780762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001672784,0.00021478481,0.0026387821,0.0012331102,0.000060853545,0.013998341,0.009523473,0.0015454098,0.0007940762,0.65823865,0.31144753,0.00013773378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031865689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028049974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03713232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065198946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012315348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19637686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236494896","doi":"10.4324/9781003048718","title":"The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.026927517995938458,"score_gpt":0.2939330178789376,"score_spread":0.26700549988299915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236494896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020596483,0.019496137,0.004146927,0.011714221,0.0006377484,0.000016287277,0.00003380436,0.00004752562,0.96184766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45055375,0.030535212,0.0053047696,0.008749199,0.0033595143,0.00017148918,0.00013873276,0.00015541777,0.5010319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969861,0.001279199,0.00009126234,0.00026379974,0.0010043422,0.00037522116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802125,0.0012715082,0.00012036847,0.00021274065,0.00025639945,0.00011774869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022092757,0.0003444251,0.00035045846,0.0011500261,0.004830102,0.008473004,0.0009786055,0.0023016701,0.010213518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060129077,0.0002747838,0.00020562318,0.0015678462,0.025493741,0.006306243,0.0028984463,0.0034063612,0.0024548909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2218037e-7,0.0000015352414,0.000010896739,0.0000120321565,3.2184153e-7,0.00000903504,0.0003086111,0.000038889866,0.0000108161275,0.990944,0.0055614226,0.0031015973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030874676,0.0000069424177,0.0001404931,0.00012653481,0.000001414062,0.000055733508,0.00080943556,0.00012564138,0.00006355444,0.6050763,0.39358425,0.0000065438026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007742491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009469701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010213518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078373905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006048588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0568645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236792495","doi":"10.4324/9781315094113-18","title":"Moral agent or actuarial subject:","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Actuarial science; Psychology; Epistemology; Business; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.12197209649168429,"score_gpt":0.3554947679513722,"score_spread":0.2335226714596879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236792495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071744397,0.017231142,0.03372639,0.033532884,0.0014152039,0.000046845813,0.00009241256,0.000086366905,0.9066943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6710037,0.019408565,0.013425814,0.010363401,0.002872592,0.00014906739,0.00015656627,0.00021211008,0.28240818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977864,0.0010020416,0.00005877363,0.00024110726,0.0006791983,0.00023250144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712557,0.0017384877,0.00021378187,0.00027647414,0.00042715514,0.00021841869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033768646,0.00046735813,0.0004104921,0.0013315794,0.0033958359,0.007998101,0.0017991422,0.0026111642,0.011458621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057881027,0.00016022436,0.00026351455,0.0015854435,0.02632175,0.0046238042,0.00195532,0.0036511559,0.0020045168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017247964,0.0000041323074,0.00012264546,0.000034134253,0.0000012211163,0.000014625397,0.0017350822,0.00007655834,0.000021943495,0.9842886,0.006521459,0.0071778754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032530584,0.000011221408,0.0010752241,0.00037651267,0.0000056615977,0.00012918442,0.0031743534,0.0006940868,0.00012561661,0.46195778,0.5324333,0.000013738612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033949025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045321956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033949025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009253611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008911194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0675028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236850607","doi":"10.1017/9781108526081.018","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236850607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067971624,0.0034125256,0.0035148074,0.0041369153,0.005373169,0.00068315567,0.1970338,0.004892618,0.78027326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019652748,0.004905053,0.002118683,0.0013185156,0.0017419251,0.0003931039,0.10126406,0.0020383608,0.884255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00012794523,0.00021951071,0.00020674487,0.00092694623,0.00012842308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289554,0.0010078236,0.00042818143,0.0007589567,0.0040751435,0.0008343696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105721,0.0011973418,0.0012027742,0.012569641,0.0016313764,0.0057338527,0.0015747846,0.0010373708,0.8310982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096948,0.0004583511,0.0006089175,0.0136079015,0.0005356659,0.0050358553,0.0024341946,0.0013659052,0.7858275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015260062,0.000016432836,0.00014121928,0.00036377544,0.0000023335094,0.0000198533,0.00005132835,0.0000468786,0.00014983078,0.0023362685,0.94756925,0.049287584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020451168,0.0000060610587,0.00027866635,0.00012563723,0.0000015149944,0.000021140551,0.000032009502,0.00001601091,0.00005685267,0.0008133191,0.998643,0.0000037316534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055967253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053208745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026802043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237684392","doi":"10.1007/s40264-020-01019-x","title":"Acknowledgement to Referees","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Drug Safety","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Medicine; Acknowledgement; Family medicine","score_opus":0.0440305095228658,"score_gpt":0.3307043194318489,"score_spread":0.2866738099089831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237684392","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014070637,0.012409776,0.008767163,0.35958493,0.52935636,0.0011413674,0.023357268,0.003613127,0.0603629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028662268,0.0074101705,0.015075969,0.14949408,0.12352012,0.0028309363,0.014165944,0.0039859186,0.65485466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794098,0.0068838643,0.0023686574,0.0020152295,0.008426308,0.0008961887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70857054,0.04106942,0.007088276,0.01194676,0.22324039,0.008084553],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011223412,0.0015534799,0.002851189,0.012357777,0.004444515,0.0064580753,0.0036490022,0.0044885124,0.31087798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20602666,0.0007652102,0.0022046347,0.0072295354,0.0015040918,0.0042197737,0.0060776602,0.0072771804,0.12045539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025832815,0.00001089651,0.00009891394,0.0001679463,0.000009964368,0.00011449984,0.000210841,0.000056152752,0.0001741454,0.0015905129,0.99200106,0.005539272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002844378,0.000011011778,0.0008815953,0.0003871683,0.00004070072,0.000248103,0.0007724171,0.00030048334,0.00021815186,0.0032421825,0.99382293,0.000046825433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0368021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0328613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31087798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009546257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01032998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9829489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238048822","doi":"10.1017/9781108675321.015","title":"Index","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03534017225878285,"score_gpt":0.26558892029203235,"score_spread":0.2302487480332495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238048822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005476668,0.0028324532,0.0029535212,0.0036995427,0.0051258323,0.00061532634,0.14005914,0.0040957527,0.8400707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014045677,0.0037906317,0.001602676,0.0010498428,0.0013777576,0.00030543446,0.06702441,0.0015226117,0.9219221],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998517,0.0001135777,0.00018461132,0.00018594571,0.0008798633,0.000119044416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939672,0.00081350247,0.00033893657,0.00061630673,0.003530923,0.0007332007],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010474464,0.0011814648,0.0011841006,0.01145428,0.0016037547,0.0057946346,0.001522315,0.0011193479,0.8355505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011298658,0.00045638098,0.000604925,0.012386682,0.00052961626,0.0047081467,0.0022889955,0.001361387,0.79485923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136439685,0.000015113893,0.00011571565,0.00031086418,0.0000018750484,0.000018032983,0.000041545358,0.00004646208,0.00014072518,0.0023749517,0.94913906,0.04778196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019839829,0.0000059678428,0.00025395377,0.00011485478,0.0000013254862,0.000019700768,0.00002809116,0.000016683653,0.000051594732,0.0007800545,0.99872226,0.0000035122641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006189701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00575251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16444951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025323865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027427594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238243658","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3649826","title":"Knowledge Judgments in 'Gettier' Cases","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02628667410425053,"score_gpt":0.33432181828128926,"score_spread":0.30803514417703876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238243658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7975821,0.00052046386,0.0090269605,0.0069763614,0.00015462164,0.00018599523,0.00015455026,0.000055987643,0.18534298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593544,0.00007128354,0.0008805684,0.00050047593,0.000051557345,0.000024665376,0.000053140408,0.000013929985,0.0024690218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775918,0.006854231,0.0015294687,0.002633891,0.008064051,0.0033265196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9039982,0.07276971,0.007085051,0.0070341695,0.006171475,0.0029414424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016303265,0.00043875186,0.000993228,0.0032524401,0.0033362918,0.010220765,0.0016777328,0.0065526953,0.017959109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1744496,0.0004511736,0.0008145436,0.0016643093,0.007840825,0.016449055,0.00678305,0.0043855333,0.00090592203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021444936,0.0008489036,0.06085957,0.00039441895,0.00031639336,0.0047980696,0.05582812,0.0033067584,0.0035235928,0.7531422,0.0101372395,0.10470028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019512318,0.0003985865,0.053430207,0.0002385097,0.00023934092,0.0012780051,0.031154012,0.00998653,0.0040798583,0.88222617,0.016629541,0.00014408874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00712242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008136284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017959109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030833008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001873176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08622098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238574055","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198795827.003.0002","title":"2. The nature of the express trust","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Beneficiary; Settlor; Trust law; Express trust; Blind trust; Insolvency; Context (archaeology); Business; Law; Property (philosophy); Voting trust; Constructive trust; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.018131686952768622,"score_gpt":0.23259280623394082,"score_spread":0.2144611192811722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238574055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049644476,0.004230729,0.005233899,0.010264937,0.00050628785,0.000028446719,0.00007436445,0.00003910227,0.9746577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38898814,0.0063831154,0.0031915607,0.0042997696,0.000822343,0.00012796576,0.00012669316,0.00014756928,0.5959128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974348,0.00071870856,0.00009731608,0.00028404949,0.0010181831,0.0004469744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983156,0.00060997606,0.0001555904,0.00024803146,0.00048227384,0.00018869867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016350253,0.00025144318,0.0002761858,0.00086496014,0.0034721273,0.013384151,0.0007185781,0.0022741486,0.010845281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044079805,0.00029283713,0.0002961462,0.0010397681,0.015414004,0.0077624973,0.0027151778,0.0037566232,0.0029484578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030228232,0.0000024598332,0.000050762745,0.000014433576,3.6732501e-7,0.000031574993,0.0021152778,0.000025998654,0.00003139139,0.98696774,0.006646629,0.0041103833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004681238,0.0000144303285,0.0005870905,0.00029722607,0.000004194146,0.0003362342,0.0032701637,0.00022728015,0.00019733884,0.24976608,0.7452817,0.000013604594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026383884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024832409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026383884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008213872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064829993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05959612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239702562","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-4555-3.ch002","title":"Adverse Effects Discrimination","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in public policy and administration (APPA) book series","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Equity (law); Law; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.024089807882359857,"score_gpt":0.32278390841070626,"score_spread":0.2986941005283464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239702562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013163369,0.002481198,0.004245374,0.0059105824,0.0009424393,0.000048486465,0.00008236207,0.000053115422,0.98492014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12609103,0.0069573913,0.003671286,0.029075947,0.0016629366,0.00016488448,0.00017675779,0.00014356362,0.8320562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533635,0.0007805844,0.00012209077,0.0005784795,0.0025404259,0.00064214383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720085,0.0011205986,0.00017969839,0.0004959234,0.0008317637,0.00017114788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002756229,0.000738551,0.00036836675,0.0013514464,0.0032720973,0.0046977745,0.0013516208,0.004442618,0.044891655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055693416,0.00033184444,0.0008744947,0.00087696547,0.008702399,0.003642005,0.004211684,0.0060016923,0.008031782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005367004,0.000022824881,0.00018409832,0.00004150463,0.0000041096487,0.00009458846,0.0004685468,0.00013099049,0.0002181028,0.9348961,0.044372473,0.019561242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063768607,0.000024394958,0.0005615567,0.00018831836,0.000009821783,0.0003605687,0.0002996029,0.00013955569,0.0005393747,0.14816351,0.8496906,0.00001623885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011216593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013344445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044891655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041128364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004530969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15017754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239922229","doi":"10.1017/9781316756041.010","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239922229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067971624,0.0034125256,0.0035148074,0.0041369153,0.005373169,0.00068315567,0.1970338,0.004892618,0.78027326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019652748,0.004905053,0.002118683,0.0013185156,0.0017419251,0.0003931039,0.10126406,0.0020383608,0.884255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00012794523,0.00021951071,0.00020674487,0.00092694623,0.00012842308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289554,0.0010078236,0.00042818143,0.0007589567,0.0040751435,0.0008343696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105721,0.0011973418,0.0012027742,0.012569641,0.0016313764,0.0057338527,0.0015747846,0.0010373708,0.8310982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096948,0.0004583511,0.0006089175,0.0136079015,0.0005356659,0.0050358553,0.0024341946,0.0013659052,0.7858275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015260062,0.000016432836,0.00014121928,0.00036377544,0.0000023335094,0.0000198533,0.00005132835,0.0000468786,0.00014983078,0.0023362685,0.94756925,0.049287584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020451168,0.0000060610587,0.00027866635,0.00012563723,0.0000015149944,0.000021140551,0.000032009502,0.00001601091,0.00005685267,0.0008133191,0.998643,0.0000037316534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055967253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053208745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026802043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240620864","doi":"10.3138/9781442687745","title":"Contextual Subjects","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.034240323381895026,"score_gpt":0.24969382104529755,"score_spread":0.21545349766340252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240620864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027521255,0.0028345375,0.008161573,0.0025297024,0.0003486489,0.00006070443,0.00024947175,0.00009892762,0.9829642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3994605,0.011087798,0.012218784,0.0036832257,0.00135481,0.0004897299,0.0014401021,0.0006658431,0.5695992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984012,0.0007481862,0.000059009457,0.00030911402,0.00029680633,0.00018557836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897707,0.00041338458,0.000054864006,0.00025810566,0.00021504909,0.000081546794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014940753,0.0006378532,0.0004752043,0.0015471227,0.0036852325,0.0066751605,0.00091584155,0.0014361939,0.046378013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002751419,0.00033168978,0.00046490674,0.0020143758,0.007280626,0.0072150086,0.0032382603,0.0022418203,0.005931713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046661344,0.0000037428138,0.000055184926,0.000038959974,0.000001174057,0.00003307026,0.0024123113,0.000023268278,0.00005302924,0.9819941,0.0080052065,0.007375199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046205487,0.0000074093623,0.0002364176,0.00023942467,0.00000529792,0.0001199494,0.0030180782,0.0000760326,0.00015252408,0.15752256,0.8386119,0.000005754612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008428617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012206453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046378013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043194266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002974467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15514994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240797935","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006263.v1","title":"To punish or not punish: a comparative analysis of the legislative treatment of exemplary damages in Commonwealth jurisdictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Commonwealth; Legislature; Legislation; Political science; Law; Common law; Intellectual property; Business","score_opus":0.08846968357664861,"score_gpt":0.4150822134370851,"score_spread":0.32661252986043654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240797935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68586713,0.012354847,0.0042426367,0.011579598,0.00028089693,0.0003743202,0.00021120449,0.00004700522,0.28504235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989678,0.002552712,0.00086039735,0.0023811816,0.00007174424,0.00018227332,0.00006162139,0.000029179088,0.0041829376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9515143,0.021517862,0.0024914648,0.0023145569,0.015360636,0.00680118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90511817,0.06273894,0.015414839,0.0030659896,0.011527907,0.0021342214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03214131,0.00029794112,0.0008342699,0.0064351475,0.008142504,0.0065635713,0.0028773875,0.0038912448,0.005629694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10278505,0.0006628108,0.0011282664,0.006694715,0.015299636,0.0051418985,0.0062937452,0.0050994726,0.00033100144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005789711,0.0005251196,0.055052508,0.0016888467,0.00046258274,0.002976096,0.20257118,0.0022724965,0.0022159442,0.6197996,0.012920877,0.09893573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014970747,0.001116396,0.6819546,0.0047567207,0.0008311738,0.0019367703,0.1376496,0.0025915776,0.001971539,0.024459288,0.14221169,0.0003709436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09217892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19212009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09217892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019004624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015452972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18328476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240846124","doi":"10.1017/9781108605991.006","title":"The Incomplete Legal Transplant – Good Faith and the Common Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Faith; Good faith; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Common law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.02003519235862176,"score_gpt":0.21982929065122606,"score_spread":0.1997940982926043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240846124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013100829,0.03365303,0.025665,0.08390166,0.0013918999,0.000033640463,0.0000657155,0.00008220958,0.8421061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77618444,0.018319942,0.0117319655,0.021010373,0.002453934,0.00009854989,0.00009709384,0.0001855876,0.16991812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967019,0.0013323996,0.00009740598,0.00038786163,0.0010633224,0.00041709954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965855,0.002094472,0.00014945958,0.0005408918,0.00037056356,0.00025910515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039130687,0.0003194782,0.00066834525,0.0011406988,0.0046383487,0.009431129,0.0013108205,0.003996867,0.007837854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007015253,0.00028988157,0.00045935297,0.0013354752,0.03786211,0.013227092,0.0043663895,0.008016035,0.0012439023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.0327443e-7,0.0000018913275,0.000008828655,0.000004485676,3.866004e-7,0.0000065510962,0.0002955056,0.000030955624,0.000008884756,0.996811,0.0013040773,0.0015268013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017208824,0.0000057743828,0.000056515957,0.000092010625,0.000001288697,0.000026941345,0.0006429073,0.00018596622,0.000036718233,0.9156247,0.0833208,0.0000045954444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0096367095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00857151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096367095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076937904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064547933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05582267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240867105","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2008.20280","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.3816856800491292,"score_gpt":0.363145421978042,"score_spread":0.018540258071087168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240867105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014869239,0.002466099,0.0021768727,0.03586724,0.05187983,0.0008124293,0.0019643605,0.0009324325,0.8890315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0296595,0.00069019245,0.0006270373,0.0027715925,0.0064411936,0.00017251637,0.0006308563,0.00015379934,0.95885324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825723,0.0019428545,0.0006943696,0.0009232823,0.008417644,0.005449512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97059095,0.0014961584,0.0008167984,0.0016392018,0.006676431,0.018780548],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00886933,0.000667028,0.0016619421,0.0058633815,0.007531973,0.010667351,0.002761269,0.004985062,0.21261941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03372979,0.00079976954,0.0011014668,0.0034710567,0.001347857,0.0031626597,0.0070184222,0.0063056666,0.13434125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013656124,0.0003173161,0.0024977382,0.000069336136,0.000013762778,0.00012695968,0.00024397734,0.00010171226,0.0002753834,0.030534938,0.86448634,0.10119601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052843345,0.00015648801,0.0118445745,0.0000642043,0.000013008315,0.00018748784,0.00069224986,0.0002832978,0.00020316707,0.006654823,0.97980773,0.000040135477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004352248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01941632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7873806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031745925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01232794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7112828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241826473","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2009.20605","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.263302178068504,"score_gpt":0.3747734113707417,"score_spread":0.11147123330223774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241826473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015286966,0.0025110152,0.0022608417,0.036097445,0.0543748,0.0008739298,0.0021742906,0.0009701108,0.88545054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029978262,0.0007041365,0.0006445355,0.0027100309,0.006554808,0.0001826711,0.0006741453,0.00015671334,0.95839465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827619,0.0019160759,0.0006920104,0.00091075717,0.008301927,0.0054173637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703553,0.0014753898,0.0008081737,0.0016506288,0.0067142425,0.01899624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008708169,0.0006672588,0.0016600855,0.0058274274,0.0073389523,0.010444179,0.0027670115,0.0049318695,0.21630056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03340049,0.0007961015,0.0011215439,0.0034615002,0.0013062622,0.003094491,0.0069628493,0.006271052,0.13775188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014392677,0.0003256174,0.0025007287,0.000071453316,0.000014005012,0.0001303784,0.00023558053,0.000104514205,0.00028503616,0.028529236,0.86607087,0.10158862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000555531,0.00016057095,0.012062426,0.000065113985,0.0000130013295,0.00019086103,0.0006827458,0.0002876509,0.00020629697,0.006376418,0.9798589,0.000040538533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042627724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019146197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21630056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031700328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012405679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72359747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241856650","doi":"10.1017/9781316181744.011","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241856650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067971624,0.0034125256,0.0035148074,0.0041369153,0.005373169,0.00068315567,0.1970338,0.004892618,0.78027326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019652748,0.004905053,0.002118683,0.0013185156,0.0017419251,0.0003931039,0.10126406,0.0020383608,0.884255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00012794523,0.00021951071,0.00020674487,0.00092694623,0.00012842308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289554,0.0010078236,0.00042818143,0.0007589567,0.0040751435,0.0008343696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105721,0.0011973418,0.0012027742,0.012569641,0.0016313764,0.0057338527,0.0015747846,0.0010373708,0.8310982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096948,0.0004583511,0.0006089175,0.0136079015,0.0005356659,0.0050358553,0.0024341946,0.0013659052,0.7858275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015260062,0.000016432836,0.00014121928,0.00036377544,0.0000023335094,0.0000198533,0.00005132835,0.0000468786,0.00014983078,0.0023362685,0.94756925,0.049287584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020451168,0.0000060610587,0.00027866635,0.00012563723,0.0000015149944,0.000021140551,0.000032009502,0.00001601091,0.00005685267,0.0008133191,0.998643,0.0000037316534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055967253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053208745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026802043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241900139","doi":"10.1017/9781108380072.014","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241900139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005877453,0.0031577419,0.0030817478,0.0041016913,0.005553604,0.00065334,0.15362518,0.004249739,0.82498926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015039016,0.004258822,0.0016853928,0.0011609752,0.0015165124,0.00032603653,0.073369786,0.0015416011,0.9146369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841595,0.000120547295,0.00020768664,0.00019426063,0.0009355097,0.0001260683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933428,0.00090859545,0.00039913075,0.00067995966,0.0038834116,0.00078597927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010953592,0.0011942402,0.0012227264,0.012263203,0.0016543808,0.0059659677,0.0015484802,0.0011332715,0.8323261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012299077,0.00045928947,0.000613585,0.013348152,0.0005564173,0.0047791805,0.002389161,0.0014220773,0.7882756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014081803,0.000015984584,0.000123689,0.00033318947,0.0000020358586,0.000018811932,0.00004376463,0.000045739143,0.00014314182,0.0023310215,0.9485637,0.048364803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020589027,0.0000061895485,0.00027169485,0.00012683094,0.000001433871,0.000020854277,0.000029980423,0.000016632726,0.00005402022,0.0007904528,0.998676,0.000003797603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006291428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005858772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16767389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026352748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030070022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242060588","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198799986.013.50","title":"Facticity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Judicial review; Law; Facticity; Political science; Common law; Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09019605841147635,"score_gpt":0.3624829878023617,"score_spread":0.2722869293908854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242060588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046998984,0.0040832935,0.023822304,0.008622,0.0010109761,0.0001583258,0.001052768,0.00028403677,0.9562663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4242063,0.009747247,0.023240106,0.010070787,0.0024839556,0.000761067,0.00406734,0.0007401495,0.52468306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553764,0.001175549,0.00032178906,0.0010120712,0.0015615046,0.00039143546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940718,0.00299965,0.00048811588,0.0011148878,0.0011551834,0.00017034195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036403735,0.0004993532,0.0006688811,0.0029046366,0.0036373811,0.007275978,0.0014119988,0.0019653956,0.06478123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010763391,0.00036972231,0.0007871216,0.0026283592,0.0072450247,0.0076476177,0.0043472564,0.0028592246,0.013208788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009174609,0.0000030228866,0.00014887749,0.0000430879,0.0000029476814,0.00007021311,0.00073525746,0.000071561204,0.000048259477,0.97467875,0.014156229,0.010032627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071431773,0.000009055607,0.00032871086,0.00014149757,0.000005781671,0.0002517497,0.0004953116,0.00014255202,0.00016998568,0.19551021,0.80292964,0.000008379629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004302312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044078548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93521875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034021696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029847964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242657117","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2009.20409","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; Weizmann Institute of Science; University of Alberta; Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes; McGill University","keywords":"Best practice; Medicine; Family medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.026903875092829748,"score_gpt":0.36197772676583095,"score_spread":0.3350738516730012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242657117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042984392,0.0052593853,0.0024810664,0.12217968,0.3790122,0.0018426419,0.0054443204,0.0015440594,0.47793815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009788617,0.001961012,0.00101841,0.0108488975,0.03320663,0.0004290212,0.0021580835,0.00044727698,0.94014204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836764,0.0012359633,0.0007072415,0.00093357085,0.009188128,0.004258749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9407187,0.001030196,0.00074332586,0.0015156663,0.017514342,0.038477898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008808465,0.001334059,0.002163276,0.0038397994,0.006909323,0.009083998,0.003090337,0.0060846726,0.3667086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028410481,0.0007787725,0.001414752,0.0020910485,0.0010113496,0.002950139,0.008848977,0.007313069,0.2712141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003839592,0.00007792816,0.00031547996,0.00005082899,0.0000042021666,0.00010434018,0.000039448852,0.000033121676,0.00011711194,0.0027276515,0.9649845,0.03150712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037500413,0.00006973124,0.0020016269,0.00006440444,0.000005322658,0.00015504893,0.00021587945,0.000120132776,0.00007698682,0.0013267434,0.9959074,0.000019294504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005850793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019258287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3667086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045546712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01867297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9033133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242841926","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u200343","title":"M’Goun, Archibald, (1853–5 June 1921), KC; MA, BCL; Professor of Civil Law, M’Gill University, Montreal, since 1888","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.029307430762699187,"score_gpt":0.29768827026619465,"score_spread":0.26838083950349545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242841926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01545972,0.09457515,0.0011179951,0.025286876,0.017427677,0.0001348193,0.0071933256,0.0002442273,0.83856016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030099072,0.010337299,0.00043070246,0.001203057,0.0005113789,0.00003229081,0.0006306938,0.00007666834,0.95667875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981517,0.000023307073,0.000012166203,0.00004956249,0.00004620556,0.00005364281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998963,0.000017357966,0.000012958009,0.0000064903875,0.000046844612,0.000019958501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002881613,0.00061772,0.00029435597,0.0010679328,0.0042902897,0.0016285372,0.00058332464,0.0012850759,0.055718645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086066936,0.00033017853,0.00015998971,0.0012944728,0.0009113,0.0016449319,0.0010832399,0.0018625914,0.0092565445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012679849,0.000025042958,0.0015968231,0.00029966954,0.000007736455,0.00067233335,0.004108722,0.00014634138,0.00036641335,0.09446749,0.7900477,0.108134925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018304928,0.0000037301227,0.00094413164,0.00008987599,0.0000016754541,0.000059195998,0.00024787718,0.0000097585,0.00013922402,0.0010663118,0.997433,0.0000033958975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15745117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5455534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15745117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006384805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004087064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31306934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243010380","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u224152","title":"Cotes-Preedy, His Honour Judge Digby, (1875–16 Sept. 1942), JP; Barrister-at-law; Bencher of Inner Temple; Chairman Bucks Quarter Sessions since 1937; Chancellor of Diocese of Worcester since 1935; Chairman the Worcestershire Association","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Management; Engineering; Art; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03453864923791002,"score_gpt":0.3077397691471775,"score_spread":0.2732011199092675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243010380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012696829,0.018432247,0.00030033768,0.070191056,0.017421572,0.00011792738,0.002234333,0.00017990117,0.889853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037271322,0.0019013577,0.000066072644,0.0038361643,0.00047953878,0.000020672745,0.00013230323,0.000055159766,0.98978174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00012792536,0.0000844829,0.00024982638,0.0006409892,0.00036214132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811965,0.00027011492,0.00009757161,0.00006232743,0.0010809791,0.00036934312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012796713,0.00078684185,0.00062290457,0.0014211744,0.008059487,0.0063179294,0.0015298678,0.005128668,0.28489017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048382157,0.00072654535,0.00031044145,0.0015394768,0.0016413704,0.003526296,0.0017706723,0.00758387,0.09620279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050618787,0.000002927591,0.00007966503,0.000021818269,6.5154524e-7,0.000053817042,0.000098988276,0.000006841769,0.000018310537,0.0035348753,0.99259794,0.0035790901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024389367,0.0000025968436,0.00051987096,0.000060050155,0.000001157931,0.000029465002,0.00020789196,0.0000071856884,0.000030784173,0.0002741467,0.99885905,0.000005315095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3379485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60347986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7151098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011438223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010831566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9530526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243038383","doi":"10.22621/cfn.v118i2.963","title":"New titles","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Field-Naturalist","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.024408143281330088,"score_gpt":0.2876409314590307,"score_spread":0.2632327881777006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243038383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032120562,0.0051075234,0.0013701479,0.0037927304,0.017822215,0.000093793264,0.0023628166,0.00107379,0.9680558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004947588,0.0015180156,0.00043324754,0.00088246306,0.0012888798,0.000022131253,0.00083460094,0.00034016318,0.9941857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991271,0.000059005917,0.000037095786,0.000112091184,0.00055183156,0.000112985945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977157,0.0002508955,0.000086466054,0.00021841629,0.0011662492,0.000562261],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006594823,0.00087534724,0.0010205398,0.0033809668,0.0025495295,0.006952329,0.0017040872,0.0012522562,0.703061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028831062,0.00068848697,0.00094111875,0.003807723,0.00081950444,0.006249131,0.0023480833,0.0035880988,0.5133995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014905536,0.000015869811,0.000040484538,0.000070543225,0.0000015176585,0.000030216936,0.000056067005,0.000022904609,0.00017264172,0.005242655,0.94930923,0.04502296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018073439,0.0000023153257,0.00007351347,0.000024683457,7.380442e-7,0.00003254546,0.00002717424,0.000012157058,0.000019830804,0.0004966972,0.9993057,0.000002826993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010299416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03893445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29693902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023595686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020019542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243079077","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.241","title":"THE IDEA OF CONSIDERATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Doctrine; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Epistemology; Control (management); Contrast (vision); Legal doctrine; Law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03285581476177582,"score_gpt":0.2494688006652572,"score_spread":0.21661298590348138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243079077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021628259,0.005958798,0.20835502,0.05445943,0.0013392068,0.00018527439,0.00011966423,0.00015738404,0.70779693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91004074,0.0016903959,0.026650881,0.011243005,0.0011030731,0.00047108522,0.00007115739,0.0001735069,0.04855617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827172,0.007416972,0.00065608224,0.0034499196,0.004392314,0.0013675708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98950034,0.0050565843,0.0009973974,0.0024395876,0.001196174,0.00080986903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012931424,0.00054533716,0.00093635014,0.0018159653,0.007199982,0.009827179,0.0026256996,0.0061233323,0.0065131094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587377,0.0006356085,0.0013060228,0.0018114961,0.06089709,0.014553239,0.009587661,0.009434066,0.0009798935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021063802,0.0000013717448,0.000034550136,0.0000056430863,0.0000012476843,0.000005733697,0.0003602647,0.000019782752,0.000018992258,0.99826765,0.0003287546,0.0009538762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006776869,0.000017241427,0.000071711074,0.00005153867,0.0000073025267,0.0000530928,0.00031190325,0.00019629403,0.00008781475,0.949112,0.050074853,0.000009556854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048946454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038224729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012931424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065438203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00845022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0683887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243089165","doi":"10.1017/9781108648042.010","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243089165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067971624,0.0034125256,0.0035148074,0.0041369153,0.005373169,0.00068315567,0.1970338,0.004892618,0.78027326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019652748,0.004905053,0.002118683,0.0013185156,0.0017419251,0.0003931039,0.10126406,0.0020383608,0.884255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00012794523,0.00021951071,0.00020674487,0.00092694623,0.00012842308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289554,0.0010078236,0.00042818143,0.0007589567,0.0040751435,0.0008343696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105721,0.0011973418,0.0012027742,0.012569641,0.0016313764,0.0057338527,0.0015747846,0.0010373708,0.8310982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096948,0.0004583511,0.0006089175,0.0136079015,0.0005356659,0.0050358553,0.0024341946,0.0013659052,0.7858275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015260062,0.000016432836,0.00014121928,0.00036377544,0.0000023335094,0.0000198533,0.00005132835,0.0000468786,0.00014983078,0.0023362685,0.94756925,0.049287584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020451168,0.0000060610587,0.00027866635,0.00012563723,0.0000015149944,0.000021140551,0.000032009502,0.00001601091,0.00005685267,0.0008133191,0.998643,0.0000037316534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055967253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053208745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026802043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243175927","doi":"10.1017/9781316104415","title":"Obligations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; CLARITY; Statute; Common law; Comparative law; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.043356599858313465,"score_gpt":0.2704961509101615,"score_spread":0.22713955105184802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243175927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013293787,0.0047393385,0.013053121,0.008942023,0.00091813813,0.000040614872,0.00012819396,0.00009926167,0.9707499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1856681,0.013122406,0.01539907,0.007640961,0.0022260398,0.00031264633,0.00052946346,0.00045196028,0.7746493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978934,0.0007902975,0.00012403747,0.0002817433,0.0007335761,0.00017689318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870586,0.00063602097,0.000083622785,0.00021079603,0.00026370393,0.00010006858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002049054,0.0006796388,0.00038780927,0.0012530849,0.0032549608,0.008276035,0.0012396584,0.0026373472,0.027391959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043323985,0.0003292208,0.00035582477,0.0013090039,0.012011317,0.011464986,0.0036863883,0.0038805744,0.007914668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011132408,0.0000018781293,0.000014583658,0.000017185044,5.480517e-7,0.000010617307,0.0006602021,0.000042925116,0.0000302045,0.9805402,0.012321451,0.0063589583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017169006,0.0000043948544,0.000079982536,0.00014056837,0.0000012624522,0.000068764464,0.0005840608,0.00012216484,0.00009383629,0.37570813,0.62318873,0.000006402982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041958573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039515374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027391959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046833423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045930175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09163529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243188477","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2007.19460","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.2800880149550174,"score_gpt":0.3868590186325664,"score_spread":0.10677100367754899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243188477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01519908,0.0024839658,0.0021633636,0.034980327,0.049695667,0.0007672116,0.0019397648,0.0008964846,0.89187425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031519797,0.00070840365,0.00062548666,0.002678796,0.0062459162,0.0001657278,0.0006324943,0.00015028151,0.95727307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98302543,0.0019242617,0.0006680849,0.00089209725,0.008221211,0.0052689407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717329,0.0014821485,0.0007988664,0.0015964572,0.006357973,0.018031606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008676244,0.0006528044,0.0016235983,0.005745028,0.0074010347,0.0104588205,0.0027008667,0.004867094,0.20700419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033459157,0.0007796784,0.0010869851,0.0034593542,0.0013412238,0.0031006797,0.006796366,0.0061736563,0.12846372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014126721,0.00032267705,0.0026137466,0.0000694807,0.000014466602,0.00012907697,0.00025624086,0.00010940256,0.00027735168,0.03375914,0.8578577,0.10444931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005231252,0.00015674693,0.012209012,0.000063558684,0.000013242252,0.00018798908,0.0006995908,0.00028795496,0.00020407344,0.0069879363,0.9790974,0.00004014844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004384326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019602878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20700419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031654735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011807967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69249797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243315529","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00440","title":"Against Restitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Obligation; Economic Justice; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Rest (music); Sociology; Unjust enrichment; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13798997686747863,"score_gpt":0.4396970784488198,"score_spread":0.3017071015813412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243315529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027989626,0.007913787,0.081822306,0.30708003,0.003069713,0.00021407448,0.0001331011,0.00048655004,0.57129097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6889678,0.0025486592,0.014256429,0.19512695,0.0022283206,0.000797157,0.00010936096,0.00048634104,0.095479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96899384,0.013282496,0.0013246575,0.0060808565,0.0071032336,0.0032148822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98008865,0.009170607,0.0020134703,0.0042726644,0.0033964224,0.0010582443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038378473,0.00100216,0.0013428592,0.0015686817,0.011857975,0.010985642,0.0031187257,0.01576378,0.0062371674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039326143,0.00051532785,0.0016274251,0.0013043948,0.0668948,0.013268668,0.014826271,0.028083753,0.0020386763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006568244,0.000005460284,0.00009597468,0.000017451559,0.000006342938,0.000018091228,0.0015105953,0.00005042182,0.000043417727,0.99104226,0.004855058,0.002348355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026194079,0.000033572684,0.00031463683,0.0003178189,0.000019591442,0.00011427417,0.0017169669,0.0004190535,0.00062047254,0.75660694,0.2397788,0.000031648262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008194255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007350233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038378473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069866744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094720265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20296723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243534525","doi":"10.22215/etd/2008-13055","title":"Valuing privacy, evaluating expectations: toward a consistent approach to privacy in English and Canadian common law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Information privacy; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08326819221815666,"score_gpt":0.36736469380813125,"score_spread":0.28409650158997457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243534525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22223671,0.007439845,0.071058884,0.2328641,0.00034892152,0.0003716603,0.00048825087,0.000108010674,0.46508372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97419316,0.0013597697,0.012925152,0.0033668557,0.0000468456,0.00008287319,0.00005667761,0.000039060527,0.007929709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97699296,0.010922575,0.0007018768,0.001033104,0.006654873,0.0036946596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628231,0.019507723,0.0019367541,0.0011494971,0.01146329,0.0031196193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025745599,0.00072138815,0.0009055345,0.00543079,0.02144437,0.027027091,0.0036323247,0.0049036765,0.0029791358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06023575,0.0006097805,0.0007314455,0.0068934136,0.04696722,0.013491967,0.0054728575,0.007446187,0.00016276185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014367103,0.000030848787,0.0034423682,0.000063715925,0.000012716052,0.000076449556,0.062547885,0.00062439527,0.000081442166,0.9127409,0.0049063317,0.015458589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016368725,0.000019472856,0.014384199,0.001008353,0.00007274785,0.00008072583,0.15344235,0.0033166804,0.0005230782,0.7771388,0.04981915,0.00017815162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9671321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97391754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15374905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15374905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20115083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98153114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243929112","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.dagan","title":"INSIDE PROPERTY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Autonomy; Property rights; Property law; Tangible property; Corporate governance; Business; Public property; Interpersonal communication; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025693669923225436,"score_gpt":0.2590236299858315,"score_spread":0.23332996006260606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243929112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004908596,0.002060707,0.020824151,0.0077292915,0.00056511635,0.000060530696,0.00018998764,0.0002291258,0.96343255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4796472,0.0027795848,0.010306603,0.01086077,0.0013076445,0.00020122537,0.0004454407,0.00050334487,0.49394822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387497,0.001298984,0.00030147503,0.001690455,0.0019766702,0.00085735024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653804,0.00091659755,0.000299776,0.0012786826,0.0007178077,0.00024924747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033791116,0.0005946618,0.00062303373,0.001311227,0.0063509773,0.010552959,0.0015269193,0.004956605,0.036059678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006089375,0.00047893028,0.00089750055,0.00093871105,0.017111706,0.010773219,0.0056536137,0.0046864334,0.006647933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036471442,0.000003172909,0.00012097061,0.000021195085,0.0000027643744,0.000066850414,0.0014470709,0.00005548329,0.00007185887,0.9873646,0.0061781383,0.0046642907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054431816,0.00002174233,0.00045175644,0.00017548124,0.000016725313,0.00021471316,0.0010410249,0.00022937174,0.0004317701,0.24245797,0.7549321,0.000021801421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027393585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021427894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059957244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049897474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120631635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244696259","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_1077","title":"The Snowdon Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Savoy Foundation; Menzies Foundation; Samuel H. Kress Foundation","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.02928296900471215,"score_gpt":0.28486759391795535,"score_spread":0.2555846249132432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244696259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022964042,0.0064565493,0.0021316917,0.01889653,0.0037806442,0.000098715274,0.0016405666,0.00044552036,0.96425337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003614411,0.0013298431,0.0003871186,0.00073281676,0.00009912117,0.000022584261,0.00020956833,0.0001346759,0.99346995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979603,0.00029526735,0.00012847515,0.00036279595,0.0009572577,0.0002959527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996393,0.0006403787,0.00025856096,0.0004870968,0.0011653701,0.0010555421],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016861359,0.000604861,0.0004956491,0.0009130277,0.0043064794,0.007736944,0.0010534372,0.0036597718,0.32472175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054815225,0.00075008126,0.00048551272,0.0013806053,0.0021032537,0.0050783237,0.0034318618,0.0032524634,0.12584628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000554932,0.000017550426,0.00032342208,0.00020872492,0.000004674215,0.00046770688,0.00086497935,0.00009320185,0.0002882631,0.11829079,0.79164296,0.087742195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021585324,0.000004607632,0.000107783606,0.00006261854,7.2311985e-7,0.00006255737,0.000095090036,0.000018606355,0.000052022122,0.001660317,0.9979304,0.0000031443383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05187779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13029316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32472175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068361363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019596431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245107195","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u233835","title":"Young, M‘gregor, (6 June 1864–1 April 1942), Official Guardian, Supreme Court of Ontario, since 1928; late Lecturer, Law School of Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Supreme court; Law; History; Political science; Genealogy","score_opus":0.02601265298861979,"score_gpt":0.284876630611003,"score_spread":0.2588639776223832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245107195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017705727,0.055976156,0.000962696,0.121298954,0.037094876,0.0002708515,0.0078007537,0.0002757339,0.7586142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015131715,0.003024469,0.00014471269,0.00564624,0.0005027354,0.000024654832,0.00022454275,0.00004086089,0.9752601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999418,0.000037398728,0.000024094446,0.000089626374,0.00019879398,0.00023204606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956626,0.000049484468,0.000025059911,0.000009788889,0.00024075383,0.00010875381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005266718,0.00041520852,0.00033132473,0.0009593131,0.012992479,0.0027358944,0.00068302633,0.0034561977,0.036692314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016145079,0.0004883775,0.0002890776,0.00094405626,0.0013400543,0.0013029943,0.0010227872,0.00292354,0.0066895867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023033022,0.0000054384095,0.00070260756,0.000052314164,0.000003389329,0.0003258821,0.0015695522,0.000026584092,0.00011810639,0.010576631,0.97574264,0.010853775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018549327,0.0000032572411,0.0018240113,0.000057814883,0.000002504091,0.00003198952,0.00046813805,0.000008060135,0.00007510261,0.0003575025,0.9971643,0.0000055533446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78670406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9650331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21329594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018211259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015036921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42910415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245436203","doi":"10.4324/9780203640142","title":"Charity Law and Social Inclusion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03779091349812058,"score_gpt":0.3424177269574897,"score_spread":0.3046268134593691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245436203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060064644,0.009311798,0.0014464111,0.028985282,0.0008783056,0.00003529244,0.000018531186,0.00003744359,0.9532805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43411598,0.012211454,0.0019029415,0.011154692,0.0014158618,0.00023462955,0.000084742904,0.0000764833,0.53880316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963547,0.0015707937,0.00007607703,0.00023849751,0.0010445873,0.00071522273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986205,0.00053631904,0.00013924416,0.00011396469,0.00028518864,0.0003047318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020685093,0.00028571644,0.00030888943,0.0016341171,0.0103980545,0.009444918,0.0007687012,0.002908791,0.009991755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049552266,0.00017890186,0.00033092508,0.0019915209,0.016010273,0.005027577,0.008157846,0.0033549743,0.001498986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028134104,0.000019409885,0.0001801062,0.000029243169,0.000001579564,0.00005039893,0.006403269,0.00008280157,0.000025674419,0.94402534,0.030979147,0.01820029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047729995,0.000018512666,0.0007480086,0.00029304117,0.0000032414714,0.00012768772,0.0073364787,0.00014384245,0.00006896195,0.28359357,0.7076519,0.000009939118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011954186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01697439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011954186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006687426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010102911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048520923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245529688","doi":"10.1093/tandt/12.8.26","title":"Canada (Ontario)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Business; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.009592202141141952,"score_gpt":0.23947743661880025,"score_spread":0.2298852344776583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245529688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034580159,0.008366867,0.0005700611,0.01163127,0.0020455383,0.00013991402,0.035617746,0.0004987853,0.93767184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065018334,0.002156896,0.00033445802,0.0006355778,0.000053708336,0.000020223002,0.00223584,0.00012707351,0.98793435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883574,0.00003201455,0.000054238048,0.00016409914,0.00064264995,0.0002712655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996197,0.00014425792,0.00017907702,0.00015616739,0.0023583116,0.00096532836],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047259507,0.0006485753,0.000692952,0.0014706496,0.0052952473,0.0050227796,0.0008133914,0.0015257748,0.511846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022695097,0.0005662355,0.0004274142,0.005483049,0.001188781,0.0014148854,0.0011644197,0.00092735846,0.10930013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006710456,0.00001789203,0.0016017908,0.00032657603,0.000009722174,0.00018736433,0.00023747314,0.00009141463,0.000309563,0.0070356037,0.93431425,0.055801343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008002476,0.0000045586517,0.0036275368,0.000076048644,0.000004528938,0.000043556392,0.0001851958,0.000041818123,0.000095147705,0.00026604158,0.9956382,0.000009472673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96334356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98994046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.511846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033954952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08289183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6962924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245667600","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198738466.003.0005","title":"Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memorandum; Memorandum of understanding; Advice (programming); Wright; Legal advice; Insolvency; Legal action; Bankruptcy; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.07195046260451768,"score_gpt":0.3057933545042528,"score_spread":0.23384289189973514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245667600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073416997,0.0031636117,0.00032412517,0.003876151,0.0005966471,0.000035382465,0.006338777,0.00022606747,0.9847051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029401013,0.0015268559,0.0003422977,0.00060045597,0.000037338934,0.000011548829,0.0013733292,0.00008528524,0.9930829],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994856,0.000021080745,0.000017326265,0.00010889728,0.00027471004,0.00009238784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992118,0.00005922623,0.000024714018,0.000048056314,0.000533562,0.00012267186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002511291,0.0005356955,0.00044291036,0.0012665059,0.0043984,0.004813657,0.001018518,0.0015505664,0.58168244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009945466,0.00036517569,0.00032425372,0.0023866678,0.0007957716,0.0014352485,0.001084977,0.0016179404,0.20860468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003472529,0.000019828622,0.000524754,0.00018309146,0.00000524061,0.00025932342,0.00028775912,0.0001317799,0.00032447328,0.038748227,0.87243044,0.08705034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025310899,0.0000016863636,0.00036582584,0.000050371385,8.8359513e-7,0.00003439406,0.000087133274,0.00002614362,0.000055244534,0.00068552623,0.9986871,0.000003151774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67021996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8370565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58168244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012954383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019297399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246024616","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834","title":"The Theory of Contract Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Contract theory; Public law; Law; Philosophy of law; Normative; Exclusion clause; Frustration of purpose; Political science; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Privity of contract; Contract management","score_opus":0.02622442049486077,"score_gpt":0.24291232471329388,"score_spread":0.21668790421843312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246024616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024540098,0.043549832,0.078906216,0.03467518,0.0019193924,0.00017502536,0.00033369454,0.00013353415,0.83785313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43165487,0.11937841,0.08617574,0.026423616,0.00885802,0.0017822997,0.0008330495,0.00037429872,0.3245197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938685,0.002348524,0.00028091887,0.0007193909,0.0023566335,0.00042597228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962851,0.0023327805,0.00028213524,0.00042881095,0.00045990243,0.00021119893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041013975,0.0010563049,0.0011106393,0.0026196016,0.004398444,0.011004019,0.0021240038,0.005632385,0.012933956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00700364,0.0006148952,0.0008174774,0.0040651327,0.028702464,0.008881255,0.0035600925,0.006981595,0.004138478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.916394e-7,0.0000021064636,0.000019427254,0.000022114333,0.0000017785259,0.000013485668,0.00014469783,0.00013296519,0.0000096305685,0.9920831,0.0049987263,0.0025710363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051042757,0.0000067981855,0.00006568596,0.00014977834,0.0000025312784,0.00006215399,0.00014372374,0.00038362952,0.000023580424,0.8630398,0.13611071,0.000006496786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007701694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034572724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012933956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009558881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008831133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06935489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246837131","doi":"10.1017/9781316594216.018","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Statistics; World Wide Web; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246837131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067971624,0.0034125256,0.0035148074,0.0041369153,0.005373169,0.00068315567,0.1970338,0.004892618,0.78027326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019652748,0.004905053,0.002118683,0.0013185156,0.0017419251,0.0003931039,0.10126406,0.0020383608,0.884255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00012794523,0.00021951071,0.00020674487,0.00092694623,0.00012842308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289554,0.0010078236,0.00042818143,0.0007589567,0.0040751435,0.0008343696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105721,0.0011973418,0.0012027742,0.012569641,0.0016313764,0.0057338527,0.0015747846,0.0010373708,0.8310982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096948,0.0004583511,0.0006089175,0.0136079015,0.0005356659,0.0050358553,0.0024341946,0.0013659052,0.7858275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015260062,0.000016432836,0.00014121928,0.00036377544,0.0000023335094,0.0000198533,0.00005132835,0.0000468786,0.00014983078,0.0023362685,0.94756925,0.049287584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020451168,0.0000060610587,0.00027866635,0.00012563723,0.0000015149944,0.000021140551,0.000032009502,0.00001601091,0.00005685267,0.0008133191,0.998643,0.0000037316534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055967253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053208745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026802043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246999568","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.731","title":"MISFEASANCE AS AN ORGANIZING NORMATIVE IDEA IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Tort; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Meaning (existential); Private law; Relation (database); Liability; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.011420385509152866,"score_gpt":0.2647944649778695,"score_spread":0.25337407946871665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246999568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17068999,0.0031266331,0.33494613,0.045148127,0.00042504186,0.0001718612,0.0001365665,0.00027157497,0.44508407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98070496,0.0003578172,0.0117925275,0.00094153895,0.00017723905,0.00010471616,0.000028953824,0.0000584711,0.005833737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884885,0.0049862172,0.00048190076,0.0022167454,0.002783205,0.001043361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309903,0.003392798,0.0005956757,0.0018520073,0.00073507684,0.00032537902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010248733,0.0005014416,0.000768769,0.0017246577,0.006088968,0.01219361,0.0017287849,0.005857986,0.0020718833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009776427,0.00058489206,0.0008415066,0.001009333,0.07533157,0.018965062,0.006245576,0.0060299747,0.00031584824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014929122,0.0000027783544,0.0000364075,0.000003000447,7.221807e-7,0.000012182607,0.0006758649,0.00009641229,0.000036419275,0.99865806,0.00006889001,0.0004078396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037790255,0.0000050372614,0.000070622664,0.0000125526085,0.0000017246846,0.00002433048,0.00042752482,0.00042198887,0.00011583745,0.9940057,0.004904937,0.0000059477707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024126181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017454844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01219361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074993744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004735845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054412067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247371023","doi":"10.1017/9781108290135.021","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247371023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005877453,0.0031577419,0.0030817478,0.0041016913,0.005553604,0.00065334,0.15362518,0.004249739,0.82498926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015039016,0.004258822,0.0016853928,0.0011609752,0.0015165124,0.00032603653,0.073369786,0.0015416011,0.9146369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841595,0.000120547295,0.00020768664,0.00019426063,0.0009355097,0.0001260683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933428,0.00090859545,0.00039913075,0.00067995966,0.0038834116,0.00078597927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010953592,0.0011942402,0.0012227264,0.012263203,0.0016543808,0.0059659677,0.0015484802,0.0011332715,0.8323261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012299077,0.00045928947,0.000613585,0.013348152,0.0005564173,0.0047791805,0.002389161,0.0014220773,0.7882756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014081803,0.000015984584,0.000123689,0.00033318947,0.0000020358586,0.000018811932,0.00004376463,0.000045739143,0.00014314182,0.0023310215,0.9485637,0.048364803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020589027,0.0000061895485,0.00027169485,0.00012683094,0.000001433871,0.000020854277,0.000029980423,0.000016632726,0.00005402022,0.0007904528,0.998676,0.000003797603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006291428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005858772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16767389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026352748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030070022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247494791","doi":"10.1017/9781108648042.004","title":"Private Separation Deeds in Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Separation (statistics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Internet privacy; Business; Mathematics; Physics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.05378966785975325,"score_gpt":0.29308853099914745,"score_spread":0.2392988631393942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247494791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077008014,0.004235433,0.0013351289,0.008579864,0.0013252229,0.000014241177,0.00007679855,0.000054104556,0.9836091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04165712,0.0037485277,0.00095273106,0.0045797406,0.00054920866,0.000041131494,0.00010438298,0.00008134046,0.9482859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982004,0.00039344424,0.00006293762,0.00021166266,0.0007685594,0.0003629317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939954,0.00019725383,0.000047673195,0.00012125586,0.00014308991,0.000091234775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017994497,0.00047215272,0.00034801802,0.0005711031,0.003913896,0.005794931,0.00076467113,0.0034623689,0.07086128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003495276,0.00025757137,0.00031933293,0.0007430235,0.0045624613,0.0051202546,0.003436129,0.0056577404,0.018398676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088724255,0.000011083966,0.000037312253,0.000030956555,0.0000013563525,0.000033316253,0.0010434411,0.00004873193,0.000057564943,0.79131585,0.18207476,0.025336841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000250499,0.0000043654777,0.00011204153,0.0001581735,0.0000019165586,0.00006076727,0.00050806784,0.000046737496,0.00012314653,0.06237749,0.93659943,0.000005422355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065556196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011158405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07086128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039863936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004966942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23705459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247679508","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.02","title":"The Society of Property","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Normative; Scope (computer science); Object (grammar); Business; Transaction cost; Freedom of contract; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021958059277297663,"score_gpt":0.25504533425970555,"score_spread":0.2330872749824079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247679508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066130958,0.011037682,0.011373404,0.05177631,0.0011952759,0.000033703036,0.00015799106,0.0001576873,0.91765475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6244008,0.013791813,0.0063330247,0.015337483,0.0029510467,0.00022611459,0.00025921667,0.00034593037,0.33635464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955996,0.0018268749,0.00015934111,0.000967217,0.0008064655,0.00064036506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676335,0.00089984504,0.00029542044,0.0011496408,0.00048048384,0.0004111823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031867733,0.0006326392,0.00067327294,0.0013915217,0.0076983636,0.01493707,0.0011908896,0.0048317458,0.025906475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006075158,0.00034956288,0.0006417459,0.0013974865,0.0246744,0.014683972,0.007903944,0.00530274,0.0052399626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040068817,0.0000023824769,0.00006740111,0.000013142872,0.0000024496496,0.000034223147,0.0006966308,0.000046205503,0.00003129467,0.98686415,0.008218425,0.004019756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004700471,0.000010660819,0.00015042404,0.00008530018,0.0000041593457,0.00011529496,0.0006418278,0.00014840311,0.000077789155,0.43986395,0.5588887,0.000008876749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058144936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004125161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025906475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006743431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005584444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08666581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248006959","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511779008","title":"Vicarious Liability in Tort","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Strict liability; Liability; Delict; Legal liability; Law; Joint and several liability; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Public law; Black letter law; Psychology","score_opus":0.019382349724511222,"score_gpt":0.24619581855915557,"score_spread":0.22681346883464434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248006959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058077793,0.057324085,0.02354451,0.01742387,0.00061776396,0.000058670666,0.0000586799,0.00006729628,0.89509726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5149454,0.060458828,0.015242353,0.008032668,0.0017089129,0.00024527803,0.00016216094,0.00012692776,0.3990774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862933,0.00051922037,0.000047038568,0.00016369154,0.0005234144,0.00011733603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926656,0.0003805118,0.000060993698,0.000097771335,0.00012471322,0.000069441296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014455988,0.00054007,0.00035710578,0.0013909275,0.0020057524,0.0032464294,0.0008263946,0.0027315891,0.004061673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002660046,0.00027862217,0.0003615127,0.0014504652,0.015285721,0.0046875807,0.0023520242,0.003645159,0.0013275171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.802313e-7,0.000002973339,0.000028388135,0.000012712533,6.7386355e-7,0.000017323027,0.00044583675,0.00014857858,0.000018823757,0.9910788,0.0038929095,0.00435209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019644533,0.000008083492,0.00019385124,0.00011562862,0.0000017655474,0.00012471344,0.00021922756,0.0003299496,0.000040369923,0.8540286,0.14493091,0.0000049364835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027655172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028954851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004946467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004946467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030708688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035889328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248494748","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2009.20792","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.263302178068504,"score_gpt":0.3747734113707417,"score_spread":0.11147123330223774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248494748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015286966,0.0025110152,0.0022608417,0.036097445,0.0543748,0.0008739298,0.0021742906,0.0009701108,0.88545054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029978262,0.0007041365,0.0006445355,0.0027100309,0.006554808,0.0001826711,0.0006741453,0.00015671334,0.95839465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827619,0.0019160759,0.0006920104,0.00091075717,0.008301927,0.0054173637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703553,0.0014753898,0.0008081737,0.0016506288,0.0067142425,0.01899624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008708169,0.0006672588,0.0016600855,0.0058274274,0.0073389523,0.010444179,0.0027670115,0.0049318695,0.21630056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03340049,0.0007961015,0.0011215439,0.0034615002,0.0013062622,0.003094491,0.0069628493,0.006271052,0.13775188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014392677,0.0003256174,0.0025007287,0.000071453316,0.000014005012,0.0001303784,0.00023558053,0.000104514205,0.00028503616,0.028529236,0.86607087,0.10158862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000555531,0.00016057095,0.012062426,0.000065113985,0.0000130013295,0.00019086103,0.0006827458,0.0002876509,0.00020629697,0.006376418,0.9798589,0.000040538533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042627724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019146197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78369945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031700328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012405679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72359747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248554395","doi":"10.1017/9781108643542.017","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248554395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067971624,0.0034125256,0.0035148074,0.0041369153,0.005373169,0.00068315567,0.1970338,0.004892618,0.78027326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019652748,0.004905053,0.002118683,0.0013185156,0.0017419251,0.0003931039,0.10126406,0.0020383608,0.884255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00012794523,0.00021951071,0.00020674487,0.00092694623,0.00012842308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289554,0.0010078236,0.00042818143,0.0007589567,0.0040751435,0.0008343696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105721,0.0011973418,0.0012027742,0.012569641,0.0016313764,0.0057338527,0.0015747846,0.0010373708,0.8310982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096948,0.0004583511,0.0006089175,0.0136079015,0.0005356659,0.0050358553,0.0024341946,0.0013659052,0.7858275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015260062,0.000016432836,0.00014121928,0.00036377544,0.0000023335094,0.0000198533,0.00005132835,0.0000468786,0.00014983078,0.0023362685,0.94756925,0.049287584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020451168,0.0000060610587,0.00027866635,0.00012563723,0.0000015149944,0.000021140551,0.000032009502,0.00001601091,0.00005685267,0.0008133191,0.998643,0.0000037316534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055967253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053208745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026802043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248566953","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.511","title":"TREBILCOCK'S HERESY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heresy; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.009960277216154228,"score_gpt":0.25230285097464383,"score_spread":0.2423425737584896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248566953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019251242,0.04582964,0.002621667,0.3816456,0.03142731,0.000042370204,0.00022355614,0.00025647756,0.5360282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046150934,0.017206796,0.0018745251,0.09840772,0.006821284,0.000062380444,0.00008825784,0.00028225034,0.82910585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970763,0.00083984126,0.00006585853,0.00061493495,0.0010259912,0.00037712228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996999,0.00077124283,0.00016377051,0.00023468844,0.0009715499,0.0008597746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002357448,0.00070258544,0.0006335779,0.0012493666,0.009061612,0.0091861095,0.0010431088,0.003928255,0.027789831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008453486,0.00035095363,0.00037744665,0.0010428921,0.006351317,0.0050426046,0.0033984787,0.008270749,0.0076922798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011238876,0.000013607888,0.00012846277,0.00004143925,0.0000035337182,0.00006784597,0.0013404727,0.000026980415,0.000064204774,0.17662622,0.80187815,0.019797858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011240392,0.0000043007617,0.00006997326,0.00005891929,9.579162e-7,0.0000533759,0.00041396313,0.000019177922,0.0000415751,0.0074058827,0.9919264,0.000004328132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039970465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07414191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039970465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077792117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008461835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09296626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249319386","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198793731.003.0001","title":"1 Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; CLARITY; Law; Political science; Task (project management); Management; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02645449307939088,"score_gpt":0.23432967216263462,"score_spread":0.20787517908324374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249319386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049090665,0.0046022283,0.0019449539,0.0046113534,0.0030868666,0.000078621495,0.0014135368,0.00031723376,0.98345435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005148317,0.0054249256,0.0021000644,0.0021411874,0.0012347096,0.00008273111,0.0021242085,0.00029678986,0.981447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986737,0.00019961291,0.000057318975,0.00027950798,0.0006308464,0.00015915258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988913,0.0002504415,0.0000586944,0.00013768155,0.0005094935,0.00015234816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085347175,0.0008901008,0.00069953216,0.0017808217,0.0024451122,0.007715711,0.002150725,0.0025908044,0.37665653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003426154,0.0003767986,0.000613243,0.0023306778,0.0017064242,0.004669591,0.0028961184,0.0031279887,0.20478676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028576835,0.000038324662,0.0003237712,0.00030866015,0.0000036929137,0.00013142462,0.0009802387,0.00022972199,0.00018255916,0.13444142,0.7599778,0.10335378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.8717485e-7,0.000004739604,0.00009011905,0.00011555922,6.35593e-7,0.00004692526,0.00014082526,0.000017285243,0.00002250361,0.0038917514,0.99566627,0.000002655213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066248253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008248193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62334347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004119885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002910646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8891238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249394864","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498275.001","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Computer science","score_opus":0.03513649718592024,"score_gpt":0.24523338287804347,"score_spread":0.21009688569212323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249394864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004627225,0.005469387,0.0023480642,0.02670168,0.10320828,0.0004916856,0.006344836,0.0014647633,0.85350865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009112557,0.0016059069,0.00049936236,0.002179888,0.0045081615,0.00010531427,0.0012675002,0.00048413232,0.9884384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984603,0.0002258382,0.00008807624,0.00024653747,0.0008618098,0.000117386444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913009,0.00135646,0.00033897193,0.0008775049,0.005034891,0.001091428],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001510243,0.0009304703,0.00077363366,0.0030539017,0.0024489115,0.0035057599,0.0016855539,0.001340967,0.6555594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018508308,0.0003492078,0.00043420895,0.0029234914,0.0005593808,0.0036994237,0.0023366606,0.0027353715,0.56173676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037007355,0.0000031679106,0.000015174518,0.000028639084,3.1616884e-7,0.0000100670895,0.00003183597,0.0000068283252,0.00003219374,0.0017502506,0.9865144,0.011603445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011695043,0.0000017276473,0.000044907483,0.00004707777,4.86226e-7,0.000015055773,0.000037558053,0.000008059227,0.000028403078,0.0004914246,0.9993224,0.000001823571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003050724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050704563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34444058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017758447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021521244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49130267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249485481","doi":"10.7202/1021407ar","title":"Arbitrage — Caractère non recevable d'une objection de non-arbitrabilité fondé sur la présentation « tardive » du grief, invoquée à l'audition seulement","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Grief; Arbitrage; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Psychotherapist; Economics","score_opus":0.012806946134216199,"score_gpt":0.2620520152214924,"score_spread":0.2492450690872762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249485481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07880963,0.0056294445,0.09232625,0.12419907,0.002530864,0.0002259181,0.00009365649,0.0001957567,0.69598943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8815401,0.0011001615,0.009477095,0.00852445,0.0012306778,0.00023605453,0.000028175331,0.000098676115,0.09776448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98095465,0.008606261,0.00078742974,0.0020020546,0.005742921,0.0019066937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794806,0.0129098175,0.0017808379,0.0027488538,0.0025738566,0.0005060202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015281551,0.0006610596,0.00065989944,0.0008908504,0.0068209018,0.009376774,0.0025626766,0.008543107,0.014648669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035932194,0.00039546867,0.0012388173,0.0006768958,0.018162504,0.008255994,0.007252169,0.009982957,0.0018443213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020440095,0.000007271437,0.00016090894,0.00004151555,0.0000050000976,0.00015272215,0.002330632,0.00008039216,0.0003596354,0.9900739,0.0031326779,0.003634838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000442703,0.00007037445,0.00078129506,0.00021434121,0.000027635724,0.0007202241,0.0026306568,0.001216285,0.0019413967,0.8201208,0.1721869,0.000045837918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030400627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026502183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015281551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003328247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004493439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08081746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250377458","doi":"10.1017/9781108525251.022","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250377458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005877453,0.0031577419,0.0030817478,0.0041016913,0.005553604,0.00065334,0.15362518,0.004249739,0.82498926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015039016,0.004258822,0.0016853928,0.0011609752,0.0015165124,0.00032603653,0.073369786,0.0015416011,0.9146369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841595,0.000120547295,0.00020768664,0.00019426063,0.0009355097,0.0001260683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933428,0.00090859545,0.00039913075,0.00067995966,0.0038834116,0.00078597927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010953592,0.0011942402,0.0012227264,0.012263203,0.0016543808,0.0059659677,0.0015484802,0.0011332715,0.8323261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012299077,0.00045928947,0.000613585,0.013348152,0.0005564173,0.0047791805,0.002389161,0.0014220773,0.7882756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014081803,0.000015984584,0.000123689,0.00033318947,0.0000020358586,0.000018811932,0.00004376463,0.000045739143,0.00014314182,0.0023310215,0.9485637,0.048364803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020589027,0.0000061895485,0.00027169485,0.00012683094,0.000001433871,0.000020854277,0.000029980423,0.000016632726,0.00005402022,0.0007904528,0.998676,0.000003797603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006291428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005858772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16767389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026352748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030070022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250732797","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199229772.001.0001","title":"Rights, Wrongs, and Injustices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01759563370523861,"score_gpt":0.30141083246042727,"score_spread":0.2838151987551887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250732797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01223328,0.03079823,0.014447439,0.06468732,0.0021029823,0.000060785107,0.00023926247,0.00013093845,0.8752998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70832855,0.024641367,0.0064914073,0.015144931,0.002601638,0.00010496976,0.00029246777,0.00012343233,0.24227127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970536,0.0010941299,0.00013056306,0.00030649875,0.0010569806,0.0003582368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980599,0.0010433667,0.00017429293,0.00023119611,0.00032591846,0.00016525142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019370826,0.00052191154,0.00040224913,0.0012896267,0.002603537,0.0075935884,0.0009775786,0.003363683,0.010269963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031893523,0.00037329923,0.00040245394,0.0009568066,0.022071186,0.0058918535,0.0034497003,0.005909147,0.001372059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000322081,0.000010412461,0.00012570292,0.000024774385,0.0000025967304,0.000025116404,0.0007410644,0.0001997039,0.000046202702,0.98078007,0.013142434,0.004898681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068594613,0.00001692597,0.00067615026,0.00037497922,0.000006929696,0.00011854105,0.0015842718,0.00036509277,0.00018088387,0.755744,0.24091096,0.000014350683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006206178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055858046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010269963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046176612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003233322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034356475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250971673","doi":"10.1017/9781108674355","title":"Judicial Review of Administrative Action Across the Common Law World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative law; Public law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Administrative law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Commercial law; Context (archaeology); Geography","score_opus":0.1026137046841454,"score_gpt":0.35736368588060735,"score_spread":0.25474998119646197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250971673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01291943,0.033338178,0.0026308624,0.021117883,0.0017825344,0.00006400435,0.00010771803,0.000050121107,0.92798924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60507417,0.020252401,0.0021974163,0.007971926,0.002375022,0.00016056607,0.00026273317,0.00009579073,0.36160988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872111,0.004914701,0.0005054792,0.0010642891,0.005073412,0.0012311372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98785,0.0070334272,0.0006941009,0.00096416555,0.0030769026,0.00038142432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077192974,0.00018999637,0.00055195205,0.0026952839,0.0055501484,0.0089072315,0.0013623895,0.0031603633,0.0066857156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022859938,0.00029348335,0.00031394552,0.0028040973,0.006242475,0.0031883356,0.0022708068,0.0031467106,0.0013262554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008994856,0.0000115612165,0.0002719961,0.00007391346,0.0000056937756,0.00008779827,0.0020207223,0.00019759491,0.00009132223,0.89405215,0.0747632,0.028415069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011578418,0.000024178673,0.002837588,0.00043158984,0.000015995032,0.00011866842,0.002983422,0.0005193637,0.00030689643,0.09814491,0.89458513,0.000020704263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03153759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05865805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03153759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008516093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013103446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06270802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252001026","doi":"10.22215/etd/2001-04788","title":"Images of old age in Canadian law; revisiting McKinney","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02023113849261906,"score_gpt":0.34222795945868834,"score_spread":0.3219968209660693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252001026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13573377,0.026157266,0.0014624075,0.39415246,0.001665718,0.000065435226,0.00051974773,0.000049403556,0.44019377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92363536,0.016221322,0.0010555722,0.015174124,0.00066454976,0.000030458114,0.00008291573,0.00005638864,0.043079246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980471,0.00035994765,0.00004799004,0.00016771174,0.0006866004,0.00069070974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433005,0.0017014986,0.00041528893,0.00017990467,0.0021622155,0.0012109616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003585251,0.0005175255,0.00037982932,0.0052061197,0.027963204,0.015591741,0.0021229095,0.0038225455,0.008856609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011947649,0.00039840332,0.00032988278,0.0048341034,0.03092789,0.008090694,0.003928751,0.0061259647,0.00034070289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026189296,0.00003648316,0.004882576,0.00014577924,0.000005996565,0.00040828684,0.23432335,0.0001938657,0.0001476537,0.5608677,0.15235913,0.04660297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009672243,0.000011449437,0.023785599,0.0008994394,0.000030348448,0.0003164244,0.29639426,0.00031869073,0.00029099427,0.05795176,0.61990666,0.00008468997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98456556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99122334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10197971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10197971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091566846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73991805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252033499","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_380","title":"The Cross Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03135097480793132,"score_gpt":0.30978281930334756,"score_spread":0.27843184449541625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252033499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008670664,0.0031490396,0.0005460681,0.009116519,0.0018225877,0.000028982919,0.000688494,0.000255956,0.9835253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025299771,0.000511928,0.00013740295,0.00068184035,0.00003897188,0.000007136809,0.00015281714,0.00007432485,0.9958656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997985,0.0001336389,0.000053233063,0.000253327,0.0011201416,0.00045468367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697626,0.00022081153,0.000090190995,0.00027507736,0.0014827385,0.00095484377],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010215883,0.000556359,0.00041823514,0.0014207804,0.005793676,0.008576297,0.001031594,0.0033418282,0.3201506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004201827,0.0004783301,0.0003949719,0.0016129721,0.0014684736,0.003120336,0.0031909144,0.003304308,0.11558398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014318551,0.000010972572,0.00023951461,0.00006147233,0.0000031343636,0.00013605782,0.00035855352,0.000049768754,0.00009547862,0.071639374,0.8669453,0.060445998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010714323,0.0000017775621,0.00017138185,0.000040184426,9.182205e-7,0.000033576078,0.0001105301,0.00001834276,0.000022430402,0.0011300265,0.9984669,0.0000028280701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3466351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58160275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3466351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012707341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029319882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9697226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252090369","doi":"10.4337/9781849807975.00009","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law reform; Civil society; Law; Foundation (evidence); Public administration; Social capital; Competition (biology); Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.02302034300510894,"score_gpt":0.2661357432871959,"score_spread":0.24311540028208697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252090369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053289055,0.0035002672,0.0015830488,0.005048021,0.004105349,0.00006513471,0.00066622155,0.00030840855,0.98419076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022359516,0.0015706602,0.0007499034,0.0017737699,0.00052331376,0.000033914337,0.00048765112,0.0001152425,0.9925095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990194,0.00011709529,0.00003958588,0.00024583054,0.00045126327,0.00012690987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992379,0.00012781103,0.000038902544,0.000118308955,0.00032475617,0.0001523044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005998496,0.0007092421,0.0005334648,0.0011586004,0.0026383935,0.0062518883,0.0015444675,0.003064193,0.42587265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020031112,0.00029809854,0.0005798175,0.0015706351,0.0013335496,0.004090559,0.003546099,0.0029359874,0.25724503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002528667,0.00003560935,0.00017428127,0.00019658555,0.000002439394,0.00014775875,0.0007417663,0.00009163803,0.00029148432,0.114336394,0.7582469,0.12571003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.275749e-7,0.0000041149287,0.00005942733,0.00004836825,4.0276745e-7,0.00005975769,0.00008074104,0.000009749111,0.000025995176,0.0022029716,0.99750596,0.0000015645044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003230078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004883007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5741273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022549038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020346302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.818923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252188276","doi":"10.1017/9781316459423.023","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252188276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067971624,0.0034125256,0.0035148074,0.0041369153,0.005373169,0.00068315567,0.1970338,0.004892618,0.78027326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019652748,0.004905053,0.002118683,0.0013185156,0.0017419251,0.0003931039,0.10126406,0.0020383608,0.884255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00012794523,0.00021951071,0.00020674487,0.00092694623,0.00012842308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289554,0.0010078236,0.00042818143,0.0007589567,0.0040751435,0.0008343696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105721,0.0011973418,0.0012027742,0.012569641,0.0016313764,0.0057338527,0.0015747846,0.0010373708,0.8310982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096948,0.0004583511,0.0006089175,0.0136079015,0.0005356659,0.0050358553,0.0024341946,0.0013659052,0.7858275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015260062,0.000016432836,0.00014121928,0.00036377544,0.0000023335094,0.0000198533,0.00005132835,0.0000468786,0.00014983078,0.0023362685,0.94756925,0.049287584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020451168,0.0000060610587,0.00027866635,0.00012563723,0.0000015149944,0.000021140551,0.000032009502,0.00001601091,0.00005685267,0.0008133191,0.998643,0.0000037316534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055967253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053208745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026802043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252444009","doi":"10.1017/9781108348683.009","title":"Unjust Enrichment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Unjust enrichment; Computer science; Business; Political science; Restitution; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.03265397785757,"score_gpt":0.2437789835761326,"score_spread":0.21112500571856258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252444009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048643033,0.005450742,0.0022283194,0.018382488,0.0025956302,0.00002252382,0.00011993044,0.00012806527,0.97058576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036673557,0.004838123,0.0015401336,0.023960333,0.0017363838,0.00008797094,0.00021877649,0.0003593922,0.9305853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977943,0.00061561394,0.000068195855,0.00032072573,0.00093541323,0.00026579283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987488,0.00042697764,0.00005448148,0.0003239737,0.00036477,0.000080962156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001924331,0.00064893457,0.00051682617,0.0009193298,0.0036841473,0.0058713555,0.0010976504,0.003489075,0.088943064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006315097,0.00023805846,0.00044461727,0.0007000007,0.007004167,0.0060109533,0.003698596,0.005896698,0.02771265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009355181,0.000008391762,0.000051904306,0.000072225324,0.0000028487752,0.000059992755,0.00055121613,0.00005696198,0.000074004696,0.7227757,0.24925926,0.02707818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019525119,0.0000030282422,0.00006334744,0.0001586323,0.0000028101933,0.00006417215,0.00019684507,0.00003821351,0.000116687916,0.080013566,0.91933596,0.000004756712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005131552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008461235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088943064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035675992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003589299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29754418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252619127","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.265","title":"LORD WRIGHT AND INNOVATIVE TRADITIONALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Law; Restitution; Tort; Duty; Law and economics; Statutory law; Sociology; Appeal; Political science; Liability; Economics; History","score_opus":0.014778380003170836,"score_gpt":0.25242463714073543,"score_spread":0.2376462571375646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252619127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04310837,0.022266626,0.013203655,0.18327112,0.00398065,0.000058931404,0.000068843605,0.00009258311,0.7339493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7008779,0.00550562,0.0058360966,0.05056181,0.0031459143,0.00010301392,0.000044005697,0.00011521452,0.23381044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426407,0.00232599,0.0001780657,0.0007036479,0.0019216319,0.00060660555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974063,0.0012892251,0.00016645652,0.00023108613,0.0007182136,0.00018874646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039526615,0.00028841718,0.00030179834,0.0010866036,0.0051511885,0.004937086,0.00084242877,0.0035546958,0.004198568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059906594,0.00027024074,0.0003035829,0.00058388786,0.02298724,0.005015676,0.0033757268,0.0058302376,0.00087812403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005959204,0.000008250881,0.00010068488,0.000015828185,0.0000016697459,0.000062892985,0.0025085967,0.0000537197,0.00006236857,0.9784604,0.01415531,0.004564318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015873196,0.000030825977,0.00036993696,0.00013219561,0.000004435904,0.00015276558,0.0014188729,0.0002810049,0.00021959677,0.36377195,0.63358337,0.000019220312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067074364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00787335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006876274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006876274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002925683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049891114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252953423","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511626746.045","title":"Chapter 3","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Infatuation; Hatred; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Philosophy; History; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.03545839744086389,"score_gpt":0.24080143182991326,"score_spread":0.20534303438904938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252953423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027766408,0.00679429,0.0018494149,0.0025227652,0.002300868,0.000045539422,0.00057134783,0.00032919223,0.9853088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015714505,0.0030342685,0.0007683533,0.0007586761,0.00035362408,0.000028345854,0.00046552147,0.0001880346,0.9928318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994541,0.000073661795,0.000023630915,0.00012610508,0.00026580977,0.00005671265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966085,0.00005675128,0.000019160729,0.000062126244,0.0001263192,0.00007477949],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046886006,0.00082551077,0.0004879729,0.001389841,0.0015936914,0.005875053,0.0012689244,0.0019574799,0.47205544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014193294,0.0003539469,0.0005720919,0.0015659782,0.0009357499,0.0033927134,0.0022472804,0.0021400668,0.25086525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014868905,0.000035583336,0.000108207176,0.00019341556,0.0000043637237,0.000060395636,0.00039289266,0.00012962491,0.00035620024,0.077537484,0.80707014,0.114096776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.7935786e-7,0.0000030916783,0.00006992396,0.00007725468,8.943266e-7,0.00004556496,0.000057010606,0.000014664145,0.000038776547,0.0037675172,0.9959227,0.0000016476722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004048902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008981349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52794456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002097023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020452985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252982815","doi":"10.1017/9781316227183.014","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252982815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067971624,0.0034125256,0.0035148074,0.0041369153,0.005373169,0.00068315567,0.1970338,0.004892618,0.78027326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019652748,0.004905053,0.002118683,0.0013185156,0.0017419251,0.0003931039,0.10126406,0.0020383608,0.884255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839056,0.00012794523,0.00021951071,0.00020674487,0.00092694623,0.00012842308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289554,0.0010078236,0.00042818143,0.0007589567,0.0040751435,0.0008343696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105721,0.0011973418,0.0012027742,0.012569641,0.0016313764,0.0057338527,0.0015747846,0.0010373708,0.8310982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013096948,0.0004583511,0.0006089175,0.0136079015,0.0005356659,0.0050358553,0.0024341946,0.0013659052,0.7858275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015260062,0.000016432836,0.00014121928,0.00036377544,0.0000023335094,0.0000198533,0.00005132835,0.0000468786,0.00014983078,0.0023362685,0.94756925,0.049287584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020451168,0.0000060610587,0.00027866635,0.00012563723,0.0000015149944,0.000021140551,0.000032009502,0.00001601091,0.00005685267,0.0008133191,0.998643,0.0000037316534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055967253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053208745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1689018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026802043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253016386","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2008.19869","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.3816856800491292,"score_gpt":0.363145421978042,"score_spread":0.018540258071087168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253016386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014869239,0.002466099,0.0021768727,0.03586724,0.05187983,0.0008124293,0.0019643605,0.0009324325,0.8890315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0296595,0.00069019245,0.0006270373,0.0027715925,0.0064411936,0.00017251637,0.0006308563,0.00015379934,0.95885324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825723,0.0019428545,0.0006943696,0.0009232823,0.008417644,0.005449512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97059095,0.0014961584,0.0008167984,0.0016392018,0.006676431,0.018780548],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00886933,0.000667028,0.0016619421,0.0058633815,0.007531973,0.010667351,0.002761269,0.004985062,0.21261941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03372979,0.00079976954,0.0011014668,0.0034710567,0.001347857,0.0031626597,0.0070184222,0.0063056666,0.13434125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013656124,0.0003173161,0.0024977382,0.000069336136,0.000013762778,0.00012695968,0.00024397734,0.00010171226,0.0002753834,0.030534938,0.86448634,0.10119601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052843345,0.00015648801,0.0118445745,0.0000642043,0.000013008315,0.00018748784,0.00069224986,0.0002832978,0.00020316707,0.006654823,0.97980773,0.000040135477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004352248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01941632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7873806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031745925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01232794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7112828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253339146","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.179","title":"ERNIE'S THREE WORLDS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035658198521737815,"score_gpt":0.24481946985963499,"score_spread":0.20916127133789716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253339146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0086573865,0.0051376494,0.004638347,0.09017996,0.0015282353,0.00002397959,0.00007779924,0.00006577075,0.8896909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51395327,0.004914103,0.005577244,0.035937224,0.0006341541,0.00012692541,0.00009774272,0.00017064088,0.43858868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964169,0.0011334623,0.000076979566,0.0006491368,0.0008739794,0.0008495363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815494,0.0005603227,0.00009354305,0.00030649017,0.00026548555,0.00061924465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034292762,0.00055074156,0.00049263856,0.0013404046,0.014381106,0.013548779,0.0009493058,0.003933591,0.015661906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053438237,0.00042080562,0.00045217574,0.0007825046,0.023348046,0.011381051,0.011665005,0.007342524,0.002203001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006060949,0.000006894132,0.00014360504,0.0000070134993,0.0000012996071,0.000055768363,0.0053024124,0.000025611242,0.000021563683,0.9595169,0.02993667,0.0049762577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048868687,0.0000083435325,0.00032505064,0.00012552181,0.0000029499017,0.00016117936,0.008787192,0.00012324365,0.00009827884,0.28319237,0.7071568,0.000014073974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03192009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059030607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03192009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009790192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071105273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07103318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253351290","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0000","title":"The judicial invention of property norms: Ellickson’s whalemen revisited","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014654528245273529,"score_gpt":0.24124766129125105,"score_spread":0.22659313304597753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253351290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060765926,0.006928732,0.01866089,0.17712696,0.0010371152,0.000072217255,0.000114650764,0.000052642437,0.7352409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107154,0.0013069994,0.0024236306,0.014317474,0.00068829115,0.00005407874,0.000021905911,0.00005421424,0.07041794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558073,0.0016359456,0.00013425996,0.001054282,0.0007066449,0.00088821905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99244237,0.0049036094,0.00039259277,0.0010454799,0.0008816267,0.0003343829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009386571,0.00038161883,0.00081697357,0.0014279201,0.009190966,0.008576986,0.0021241847,0.013812951,0.0094379345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021443645,0.00054608623,0.0005608086,0.0014356299,0.038004886,0.011287553,0.0034943013,0.0095482,0.00080436416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039524293,0.0000029979592,0.0000656095,0.0000050735484,0.0000017586802,0.000036324138,0.0013429734,0.000040037994,0.000014936682,0.9949025,0.0023800903,0.001203724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023918252,0.00000609989,0.0003342528,0.00006196721,0.00001133746,0.00004570369,0.0012912488,0.00034328853,0.00017674714,0.93067116,0.06701771,0.000016578166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08349325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114892684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08349325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009816944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008031672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16601449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253863679","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016.0001","title":"Decomposing <i>Bhasin v Hrynew</i>  : Towards an institutional understanding of the general organizing principle of good faith in contractual performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Faith; Political science; Common law; Fair dealing; Subject (documents); Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Good faith; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04354523155426537,"score_gpt":0.2984003652038038,"score_spread":0.25485513364953843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253863679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042134907,0.0074389447,0.041920055,0.12992473,0.0008109022,0.00025215966,0.00029752046,0.00010779989,0.77711296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90196615,0.004889941,0.01483139,0.029732622,0.0003714907,0.00024129737,0.00025414093,0.00009767396,0.047615245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385965,0.0011134621,0.00018028765,0.0008322182,0.002501959,0.0015122864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646974,0.0011393793,0.00040585586,0.0003714907,0.0010778295,0.0005356122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046858108,0.00053020875,0.00047747185,0.0026618582,0.008652861,0.013929297,0.003118075,0.0054089082,0.0036262446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072246334,0.0006198336,0.00059161364,0.0026170623,0.044904537,0.009667399,0.006156127,0.010470212,0.0006186577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025298293,0.0000023851876,0.000142875,0.000008996711,0.0000012611823,0.000031899304,0.0025180578,0.00006167681,0.0000585169,0.9930254,0.0022571057,0.0018893568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020173115,0.000021580783,0.0026681605,0.00029403344,0.00001510571,0.0001365155,0.007292526,0.0014982269,0.0005926967,0.81766695,0.16969064,0.000103442246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6113985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6686746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6113985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04208647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052402332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78178006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254127594","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748697748.003.0009","title":"Trusting Patrimonies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Appropriation; Civil code; Property (philosophy); Normative; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08104705175859414,"score_gpt":0.2766751140791666,"score_spread":0.19562806232057248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254127594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06796692,0.008056537,0.013776867,0.036143012,0.00073836796,0.00007679148,0.00016612954,0.00018246824,0.87289286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87043995,0.0022820926,0.001082094,0.0018973806,0.00010455891,0.000026148156,0.0000389784,0.000057852492,0.124070905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964121,0.0009827877,0.00006557209,0.00031798996,0.0010905636,0.0011310743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974867,0.00064615585,0.00020150666,0.00035989756,0.00088460563,0.0004210555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025542122,0.00051838503,0.00041664857,0.0010427039,0.015435926,0.009209696,0.0011103966,0.0028041452,0.0066530774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047257915,0.00035103897,0.00039371444,0.0013216151,0.041166823,0.005281434,0.0034155988,0.0042427653,0.0007520338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012463354,0.000008157446,0.00077581627,0.000029865918,0.000005491242,0.00036482638,0.03409364,0.00022830404,0.00015422226,0.9382663,0.014995279,0.011065593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012480504,0.000030741136,0.0036571515,0.0004484232,0.000020829317,0.00051634555,0.031925377,0.0012775899,0.00048966036,0.1392152,0.82234305,0.000063166226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.771453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8010356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.771453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04664532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02434848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45978582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254262758","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u225572","title":"Frankland, His Honour Judge Cecil J., (21 Oct. 1884–18 June 1942), Judge of County Circuit No. 13, 1933–36, No. 12 (Bradford, Halifax), since 1936","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.0412568831419577,"score_gpt":0.2953110595950058,"score_spread":0.2540541764530481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254262758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002215792,0.012717903,0.0007027322,0.11819673,0.015383761,0.00010744022,0.0038798656,0.0003217726,0.8464739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00638541,0.0012790327,0.00017853628,0.014284619,0.00050788274,0.00002859385,0.00035249832,0.00007238837,0.976911],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985133,0.00013540579,0.000054095646,0.00027368614,0.0006179611,0.00040554642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860865,0.00027562576,0.00004706793,0.0000503055,0.00085533375,0.00016305932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001017851,0.0005406399,0.000403728,0.0011767874,0.009939149,0.004605384,0.0010102841,0.0056467922,0.10832571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052778805,0.0005505444,0.0003922139,0.00079580763,0.0013812765,0.0025194199,0.0012108075,0.006358209,0.048127476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000756345,0.0000032913415,0.0000879228,0.000011970157,6.737893e-7,0.00004297829,0.000075776625,0.000008951727,0.000023631017,0.0068438244,0.9892869,0.0036063697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002454444,0.0000031607276,0.00047644187,0.00005001847,0.0000015751389,0.000028435647,0.0001428841,0.000018085677,0.000077208875,0.0007719109,0.9984219,0.000005921461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25336555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5180468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25336555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006450663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073094107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50378156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254449087","doi":"10.4324/9780203079300-17","title":"Ontario, Canada and the principle of choice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Geography; History","score_opus":0.02376932797778965,"score_gpt":0.2648053988632602,"score_spread":0.24103607088547055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254449087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002087161,0.009031743,0.002844602,0.022643778,0.0004943038,0.000058158937,0.00037627324,0.000032142318,0.96243185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19853903,0.009575001,0.0057386323,0.0090772165,0.0003034169,0.00022113859,0.0002619967,0.00012867704,0.77615494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934557,0.0012755801,0.00016596363,0.0008261886,0.002590237,0.0016863098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789906,0.0006429376,0.000099570476,0.00018544347,0.0009350299,0.00023798086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034205643,0.0008854897,0.000894118,0.001596033,0.01887359,0.010961842,0.0023511716,0.0061466387,0.023557484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055788886,0.0007845572,0.0005938347,0.0044513284,0.024589024,0.0046899263,0.0029865296,0.0053366404,0.0021513454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004616071,0.000002257943,0.00006809134,0.000021668204,0.0000021257176,0.000022155007,0.00088119315,0.00009981927,0.00001621255,0.97052854,0.025254814,0.0030985195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018863415,0.000005214685,0.0008026311,0.00027357743,0.000011679467,0.00004653955,0.001331976,0.0002776131,0.00007061208,0.3324982,0.66462463,0.000038482136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10898188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10898188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16315149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79072255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254588569","doi":"10.1093/tandt/12.1.29","title":"Book Reviews","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.03323920894731765,"score_gpt":0.34984069891739106,"score_spread":0.3166014899700734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254588569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044123223,0.30145106,0.001214169,0.01247996,0.024200622,0.00016599767,0.0029021786,0.000781762,0.656363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018013752,0.12429634,0.0011684438,0.005443169,0.005191618,0.000075395765,0.0021169754,0.0003397746,0.8595668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987778,0.0000710419,0.000053712654,0.00012631019,0.0008922125,0.00007887069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975942,0.00030939715,0.00012625233,0.0001286023,0.0015643827,0.00027708325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046251604,0.0009923418,0.0011439006,0.0035561027,0.0011760164,0.0046108174,0.0014679618,0.0014403961,0.33658314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004301113,0.0004300218,0.00059283903,0.0061810566,0.0006566372,0.0025276633,0.0010862418,0.0020138638,0.30003917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053010785,0.00000922937,0.000019830335,0.0003149646,0.000002684343,0.00002799912,0.000024996632,0.000038555558,0.000092696515,0.0011567298,0.9265606,0.07174638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015134918,0.0000029081207,0.0000607109,0.00024592254,0.0000019330719,0.000059199596,0.000017224664,0.000007538848,0.00001796508,0.00030711573,0.999275,0.0000028847712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01648652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031199893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33658314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024727054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052337423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94628364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254595801","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511800146.005","title":"Insurance benefits","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Content (measure theory); Business; Computer science; Actuarial science; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.034615442473877565,"score_gpt":0.23582001790012597,"score_spread":0.2012045754262484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254595801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017863484,0.0033103551,0.00091025303,0.004453113,0.0012927561,0.00017518977,0.019605098,0.0007739767,0.967693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010823933,0.0035688898,0.0009278672,0.0021060999,0.0005055847,0.00014821725,0.016174307,0.00024237503,0.9655027],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989121,0.000067663284,0.000042877648,0.000091294794,0.0007383705,0.00014768846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989617,0.00021758732,0.00007687214,0.0001018098,0.00042173002,0.0002202683],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008931946,0.00048685254,0.0004791291,0.0027589025,0.0009353439,0.0018322234,0.0007490537,0.0016322115,0.38051745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040358766,0.0002380589,0.00053525146,0.0019525952,0.00018862347,0.000999465,0.0009816053,0.0019535108,0.15806083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004043641,0.00004382814,0.00034147486,0.00009326412,0.0000058823885,0.00003169885,0.00005829471,0.00008209128,0.00030439967,0.019012224,0.90511155,0.0748749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007051621,0.000015435007,0.0022604682,0.000084990475,0.0000050711787,0.0000556031,0.000028300763,0.00006428917,0.000108817636,0.0014795804,0.9958851,0.000005265468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066851587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01100255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38051745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010749947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002343196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8836167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254882750","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u236210","title":"Croom-Johnson, Hon. Sir Reginald Powell, (died 29 Dec. 1957), Judge High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, 1938–54; JP Somerset and Deputy Chairman Quarter Sessions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Law; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02599109694133219,"score_gpt":0.31742551925706136,"score_spread":0.2914344223157292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254882750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017652139,0.027880346,0.0007980421,0.23820917,0.053683136,0.00023540537,0.0026001434,0.00026930147,0.6745591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003185862,0.0018887781,0.00011486381,0.011547995,0.0013747745,0.000029990715,0.00015438863,0.00007227442,0.9816311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985424,0.00019297066,0.00008508594,0.00025515942,0.00066262635,0.00026170703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810314,0.0004171505,0.00010103259,0.00005509005,0.0009878393,0.00033575261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017587268,0.00055634254,0.0007339138,0.0011367573,0.0077536143,0.0040763374,0.0011832719,0.0045479224,0.1450943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055003464,0.00062432175,0.00031830347,0.0010310649,0.0009372516,0.0024015184,0.0015109249,0.008265959,0.08817622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074460468,0.000003152632,0.00004717226,0.0000132570485,6.6646925e-7,0.000032609212,0.000055735058,0.000005408891,0.000023598406,0.0022182323,0.9942941,0.0032985518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002286648,0.0000033140286,0.00032659897,0.000036495483,0.0000013453039,0.000028809465,0.00011118988,0.000011084267,0.000049803934,0.0004039035,0.999019,0.0000061480678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07846708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21894717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1450943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045921286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050148265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48538882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254956224","doi":"10.5040/9781472566355.ch-003","title":"Mens Rea in the Common Law of England and Wales, Australia and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Law; Geography; History; Criminology; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; Criminal law","score_opus":0.045520666007776475,"score_gpt":0.2709109017945932,"score_spread":0.22539023578681672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254956224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029624255,0.09760943,0.0021339671,0.035078388,0.0015977662,0.00013528076,0.00040981,0.000057715388,0.8333534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31110469,0.027456706,0.0018289863,0.0043511773,0.0002933172,0.000086618275,0.00014632016,0.000079412355,0.6546528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962388,0.0007268213,0.00015205074,0.0003523414,0.0014315161,0.0010983794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981523,0.0005747843,0.00008525663,0.00012539036,0.0007058575,0.00035638374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021524655,0.00060084264,0.00088258483,0.0021564,0.011255721,0.011296081,0.0013770415,0.0039389487,0.012188551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074878456,0.0006452245,0.00026459206,0.005189351,0.0153786205,0.0037147384,0.002797655,0.005173245,0.0009824093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009476171,0.000013322441,0.00038296322,0.00006625172,0.000004369658,0.00010123804,0.00975711,0.00017280133,0.00004763307,0.92018276,0.045253016,0.024009144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009445876,0.000019584464,0.0051626544,0.000419906,0.000012329794,0.00013890545,0.0088805435,0.00031050088,0.00008894977,0.120481074,0.8644246,0.000051411294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9642925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98376954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061109062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061109062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13657793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4433794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255372687","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2009.21148","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.263302178068504,"score_gpt":0.3747734113707417,"score_spread":0.11147123330223774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255372687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015286966,0.0025110152,0.0022608417,0.036097445,0.0543748,0.0008739298,0.0021742906,0.0009701108,0.88545054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029978262,0.0007041365,0.0006445355,0.0027100309,0.006554808,0.0001826711,0.0006741453,0.00015671334,0.95839465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827619,0.0019160759,0.0006920104,0.00091075717,0.008301927,0.0054173637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703553,0.0014753898,0.0008081737,0.0016506288,0.0067142425,0.01899624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008708169,0.0006672588,0.0016600855,0.0058274274,0.0073389523,0.010444179,0.0027670115,0.0049318695,0.21630056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03340049,0.0007961015,0.0011215439,0.0034615002,0.0013062622,0.003094491,0.0069628493,0.006271052,0.13775188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014392677,0.0003256174,0.0025007287,0.000071453316,0.000014005012,0.0001303784,0.00023558053,0.000104514205,0.00028503616,0.028529236,0.86607087,0.10158862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000555531,0.00016057095,0.012062426,0.000065113985,0.0000130013295,0.00019086103,0.0006827458,0.0002876509,0.00020629697,0.006376418,0.9798589,0.000040538533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042627724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019146197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21630056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031700328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012405679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72359747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255382887","doi":"10.29173/alr117","title":"Overlapping Remedies and the Unexpected Termination of Oil and Gas Leases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Lease; Freehold; Unjust enrichment; Law; Tort; Interpretation (philosophy); Common law; Economics; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Liability","score_opus":0.03898283919559765,"score_gpt":0.2984717149189567,"score_spread":0.25948887572335905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255382887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25663108,0.037767865,0.05939818,0.042921055,0.00061844935,0.00038643926,0.00019862749,0.00022689898,0.60185134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732093,0.0041271783,0.0044086846,0.00235749,0.00016352833,0.00005770408,0.000028895422,0.000016051314,0.015631039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98029286,0.005152235,0.0009154153,0.0016244409,0.008732122,0.003282993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812351,0.011435725,0.002833183,0.001196162,0.002608529,0.0006913301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009689021,0.00038338132,0.00072454265,0.0038529981,0.003943406,0.0064538145,0.0025015443,0.008238076,0.0033811165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029429598,0.0005608909,0.0008606296,0.002162753,0.014360762,0.004157126,0.0037922212,0.0060804463,0.00036767192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003844159,0.000054489774,0.002584659,0.00011647576,0.00003682626,0.0012120734,0.0014120719,0.0035449143,0.0005865481,0.95158565,0.0035248867,0.03530307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016668934,0.00030004565,0.019647319,0.001391765,0.00023844308,0.0023347365,0.0037722574,0.01145355,0.0030290363,0.78838116,0.16904637,0.0002386344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0557816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0981015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9442184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011335227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017558703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11091381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255401799","doi":"10.1017/9781108332835.015","title":"Index","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03534017225878285,"score_gpt":0.26558892029203235,"score_spread":0.2302487480332495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255401799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005476668,0.0028324532,0.0029535212,0.0036995427,0.0051258323,0.00061532634,0.14005914,0.0040957527,0.8400707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014045677,0.0037906317,0.001602676,0.0010498428,0.0013777576,0.00030543446,0.06702441,0.0015226117,0.9219221],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998517,0.0001135777,0.00018461132,0.00018594571,0.0008798633,0.000119044416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939672,0.00081350247,0.00033893657,0.00061630673,0.003530923,0.0007332007],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010474464,0.0011814648,0.0011841006,0.01145428,0.0016037547,0.0057946346,0.001522315,0.0011193479,0.8355505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011298658,0.00045638098,0.000604925,0.012386682,0.00052961626,0.0047081467,0.0022889955,0.001361387,0.79485923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136439685,0.000015113893,0.00011571565,0.00031086418,0.0000018750484,0.000018032983,0.000041545358,0.00004646208,0.00014072518,0.0023749517,0.94913906,0.04778196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019839829,0.0000059678428,0.00025395377,0.00011485478,0.0000013254862,0.000019700768,0.00002809116,0.000016683653,0.000051594732,0.0007800545,0.99872226,0.0000035122641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006189701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00575251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16444951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025323865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027427594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255917115","doi":"10.1017/s0008197308000044","title":"Sham Trusts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Lease; Database transaction; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Statutory law; Law; Payment; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04437690517440169,"score_gpt":0.3045272433894376,"score_spread":0.2601503382150359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255917115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07650859,0.0024583843,0.03267551,0.026279112,0.0010059812,0.00017436211,0.000233266,0.00022013119,0.8604447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91332084,0.000771297,0.0020750756,0.0021659553,0.00021799252,0.000076497905,0.000064715416,0.00004208563,0.08126559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925863,0.0022278868,0.00048531225,0.0009706564,0.0022058827,0.0015240016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887567,0.003314223,0.0016260631,0.0021025648,0.002695989,0.0015043718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051108,0.00032817945,0.0005053472,0.0010428439,0.0065870816,0.008451919,0.0010939561,0.0038065787,0.01849525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019395368,0.00034783606,0.0005307136,0.001025997,0.019964827,0.010567267,0.007009804,0.0037527066,0.0027096597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072318835,0.000003978509,0.00025916912,0.000020833038,0.0000026345742,0.00013225708,0.0024809688,0.0000554405,0.00006472682,0.9917169,0.0027753897,0.0024803972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022932565,0.000048777496,0.00071369903,0.00020188293,0.00001732205,0.0007585844,0.00635042,0.00075372803,0.00026745957,0.7429664,0.24786444,0.000034302175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004873555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004207655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01849525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064452253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066327164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06187284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256174237","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.643","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF CONTRACT REMEDIES (AND WHY DO CONTRACTS PROFESSORS TEACH REMEDIES FIRST?)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Compensation (psychology); Incentive; Normative; Breach of contract; Contract theory; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01139003454695533,"score_gpt":0.2541324606851664,"score_spread":0.24274242613821104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256174237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053791676,0.03563513,0.014218161,0.6953695,0.0033697884,0.0000596555,0.00009606792,0.00019348873,0.19726652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.857775,0.015299841,0.006233548,0.06385299,0.002421157,0.000109053464,0.00004910229,0.00017237208,0.054086894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98608404,0.0060938727,0.000330537,0.0016345098,0.0037181408,0.0021389239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765587,0.0097341845,0.0024806033,0.0019349463,0.0035759113,0.005715713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131047275,0.00019668124,0.0004169088,0.0012521156,0.005540782,0.007035497,0.0012932831,0.0055619753,0.006913172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034349512,0.00044246536,0.00031167426,0.0014313672,0.023601064,0.011100014,0.0040442557,0.009600652,0.0014971045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001695782,0.00009144155,0.0014873319,0.00009392677,0.0000065445533,0.000053282478,0.0075809807,0.00025509793,0.00017113355,0.8860742,0.026935723,0.07723337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004346352,0.00010725917,0.008760247,0.00061975484,0.000008616046,0.00016843526,0.0061841523,0.00045416283,0.0004691724,0.27882954,0.70430094,0.00005431174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015326591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017613636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021048358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021048358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014766491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15271723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256221483","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139005302","title":"Principle and Policy in Contract Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Appeal; Formalism (music); Interdependence; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.032180096178701594,"score_gpt":0.26779979572014484,"score_spread":0.23561969954144324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256221483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029608542,0.017417539,0.05718051,0.033116456,0.001068491,0.000110221205,0.00009300668,0.00010612624,0.88794684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56088537,0.03651028,0.07430047,0.022414923,0.0046054693,0.0012405571,0.00030055555,0.0003953116,0.29934713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924562,0.003416833,0.0003156995,0.0008929468,0.0023378166,0.0005805368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997726,0.001378617,0.0001374622,0.00032567338,0.0003044902,0.0001277555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072925636,0.0007463529,0.00072276336,0.0017471752,0.005412108,0.009876669,0.0014998678,0.0066038934,0.0074227145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006947963,0.00052842195,0.0007917129,0.0024934986,0.040534675,0.011001704,0.00386322,0.009029282,0.0023858026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.618691e-7,0.0000012907492,0.000005802063,0.0000060888774,3.7944298e-7,0.0000037434402,0.0001192419,0.00004793189,0.000006448867,0.99802387,0.000877489,0.00090727257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029913558,0.0000034634143,0.000026443586,0.00005337886,0.0000011768209,0.000019102901,0.000086179556,0.00016061109,0.00001981421,0.9516602,0.04796286,0.0000037292625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062558744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003295547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01009142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01009142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010716735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07321876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256344364","doi":"10.1017/9781139013826.020","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256344364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005877453,0.0031577419,0.0030817478,0.0041016913,0.005553604,0.00065334,0.15362518,0.004249739,0.82498926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015039016,0.004258822,0.0016853928,0.0011609752,0.0015165124,0.00032603653,0.073369786,0.0015416011,0.9146369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841595,0.000120547295,0.00020768664,0.00019426063,0.0009355097,0.0001260683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933428,0.00090859545,0.00039913075,0.00067995966,0.0038834116,0.00078597927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010953592,0.0011942402,0.0012227264,0.012263203,0.0016543808,0.0059659677,0.0015484802,0.0011332715,0.8323261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012299077,0.00045928947,0.000613585,0.013348152,0.0005564173,0.0047791805,0.002389161,0.0014220773,0.7882756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014081803,0.000015984584,0.000123689,0.00033318947,0.0000020358586,0.000018811932,0.00004376463,0.000045739143,0.00014314182,0.0023310215,0.9485637,0.048364803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020589027,0.0000061895485,0.00027169485,0.00012683094,0.000001433871,0.000020854277,0.000029980423,0.000016632726,0.00005402022,0.0007904528,0.998676,0.000003797603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006291428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005858772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16767389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026352748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030070022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256381139","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttn135","title":"Offshore: Guernsey","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Ecological succession; Position (finance); Population; Law enforcement; Subject (documents); Geography; History; Political science; Sociology; Business; Ecology; Library science; Computer science; Advertising; Demography","score_opus":0.024099825527013136,"score_gpt":0.3377841127325339,"score_spread":0.3136842872055208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256381139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4338378,0.0045541176,0.0006299698,0.0046972176,0.0003583148,0.00011300323,0.0049640858,0.00023244123,0.5506131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62832165,0.0044160476,0.0013013035,0.0014789593,0.000049707116,0.000106279054,0.0023838438,0.00014299284,0.36179918],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962723,0.000050699713,0.00002378211,0.000056302157,0.00010600884,0.00013586553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989843,0.00012091628,0.00014592272,0.0000480841,0.00033815153,0.00036258265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024651215,0.00014675096,0.00014487522,0.0010016031,0.0019517211,0.0013078463,0.0002751432,0.00039141648,0.05413453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015688312,0.00010296212,0.00007676707,0.0019140263,0.0006551801,0.0011443447,0.0020269493,0.00050431746,0.0045249164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045305357,0.00014371035,0.22264914,0.0016815654,0.000024916615,0.0076779574,0.06305762,0.00030027746,0.0040684277,0.054291103,0.32293865,0.32271352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000848788,0.00004842657,0.24806543,0.000289132,0.0000069385283,0.0015953846,0.054228645,0.000065148044,0.00044565147,0.00067686645,0.69454986,0.000020018184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31040162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53735447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31040162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028722754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034904345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61718976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256565409","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u213600","title":"Marler, William de Montmollin, (10 Nov. 1849–1929), Notary; Emeritus Professor of Civil Law, McGill University, Montreal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.029452409224665486,"score_gpt":0.2947746859479036,"score_spread":0.26532227672323816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256565409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016901557,0.17728151,0.0011379583,0.095159076,0.04647402,0.00009701875,0.0056587677,0.00032728625,0.6721742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046311356,0.014518755,0.00019129386,0.0037074443,0.0018086837,0.0000235875,0.00023782533,0.00007022022,0.9748111],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999655,0.00004265694,0.000021617114,0.00009423615,0.00012526312,0.00006126166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961984,0.00007306318,0.000039734674,0.000013304196,0.00018914207,0.000064989814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005152134,0.0007385612,0.00047022157,0.0014757639,0.0035467679,0.0027536154,0.000825243,0.0020896809,0.115185805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018165272,0.00046432787,0.00025289485,0.0013396448,0.00080253195,0.0024702745,0.0013229563,0.002709799,0.053413674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019753934,0.0000038508806,0.00015043294,0.00004649053,0.0000014907802,0.00006809822,0.00019556786,0.000018235076,0.00003951546,0.008503605,0.96971333,0.021239603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012085861,0.0000019038187,0.00021150263,0.000051953728,7.0102396e-7,0.00002555303,0.00005429573,0.0000044218273,0.000030322786,0.0003470782,0.99926895,0.0000019289332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05681464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23398694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115185805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037620524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020930683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3853349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256726705","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986672","title":"Law reform commission of nova Scotia final report privity of contract (third party rights)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Privity of contract; Law; Commission; Political science; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04649608744291367,"score_gpt":0.3424570061971877,"score_spread":0.29596091875427405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256726705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050313585,0.003654512,0.00095107843,0.0755946,0.005738349,0.003974782,0.027037099,0.00095615216,0.83177984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043649122,0.0009479172,0.0012273953,0.019672796,0.000391185,0.00077410915,0.0032645012,0.00016461425,0.9299084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867209,0.0006709694,0.00055392634,0.00097389834,0.006857899,0.004222465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98147273,0.003144262,0.00044924417,0.0013544494,0.011127026,0.0024522871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065890257,0.0006990137,0.0010356732,0.0036334533,0.008877277,0.012626684,0.002898846,0.015598253,0.046333738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019059544,0.0016843965,0.0011136036,0.002227278,0.0018683759,0.0014962807,0.0029975607,0.0073603396,0.011314991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022262151,0.00016456743,0.004686814,0.00025173355,0.000039227933,0.0007531652,0.00094442855,0.0003680912,0.0018833441,0.053019926,0.92206466,0.015601377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018732819,0.00008230693,0.049879104,0.00035905547,0.00007079404,0.000097428,0.00083219225,0.0005385262,0.0011826365,0.0018244255,0.94485873,0.000087552966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.869627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91879755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.130373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038991883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12838273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28290725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280587145","doi":"10.1177/14737795211070838","title":"Strike-out Appeals, Unjust Enrichment, and Discoverability: Insights from Kenya","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Appeal; Political science; Common law; Mistake; Subject (documents); High Court; Tribunal; Interlocutory; Restitution","score_opus":0.03943548343380984,"score_gpt":0.33616096039292775,"score_spread":0.2967254769591179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280587145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5110684,0.01260571,0.0013271997,0.027223315,0.000092400005,0.00018315233,0.0001883156,0.0000073920314,0.44730407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701961,0.008201884,0.00042596488,0.0032578206,0.000042205633,0.000066141045,0.00006393844,0.000011698595,0.017734207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998268,0.0006637615,0.000100179845,0.0001330169,0.00035302405,0.00048185847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928758,0.0058114235,0.0005179979,0.00013297882,0.00046764818,0.0001941714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034214114,0.00022637931,0.0005865166,0.0028870022,0.01160237,0.0064770845,0.0011082602,0.0035414298,0.00986351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010574325,0.00040633095,0.0002805981,0.0038394842,0.00944515,0.010327826,0.003488818,0.0036080007,0.00052376074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007237982,0.00016797191,0.010075106,0.00038725114,0.00001856019,0.0036398054,0.1724509,0.00029401307,0.00047345116,0.782144,0.009224287,0.021052206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011327472,0.00011837953,0.04923,0.003000142,0.00014830782,0.0013094819,0.48650703,0.0012232363,0.0009055019,0.17694604,0.2803663,0.00013230053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097836256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27492902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097836256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009204163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00779796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19453359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282970988","doi":"10.1017/9781009053655.012","title":"Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03060379322728132,"score_gpt":0.26654101504999245,"score_spread":0.23593722182271112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282970988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005751876,0.0029038882,0.0031332606,0.0036385756,0.0050580036,0.00062830345,0.1545842,0.0041904314,0.8252883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015111199,0.003976761,0.001778057,0.001067201,0.0014471571,0.00032422633,0.07487747,0.0016285254,0.91338944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985297,0.00011345594,0.00018694488,0.00018631482,0.00086800294,0.00011556619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939061,0.00084564864,0.00035061507,0.0006409503,0.003537477,0.00071928237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010333759,0.0011932862,0.0012170862,0.0119070755,0.0015926218,0.00567264,0.0015130161,0.0010801649,0.8296749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011288893,0.0004611966,0.0006017467,0.013109372,0.0005239489,0.0046401476,0.0022577485,0.0013481028,0.7878448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014158462,0.000016009923,0.00012515174,0.00032307813,0.0000020627285,0.000018757917,0.00004326804,0.000049338585,0.0001495983,0.0023758907,0.9482967,0.048585888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020054251,0.000006064014,0.0002720315,0.00011635037,0.0000014304599,0.000020504905,0.00002904355,0.000017517481,0.000054878583,0.00081333634,0.9986632,0.0000036107467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006034343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005590039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1703251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002477747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026134157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283275979","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198870463.003.0011","title":"Canada—Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Wife; Spouse; Law; Jurisdiction; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Testamentary trust; Civil procedure; Marriage law; Common law; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.02663444300344748,"score_gpt":0.2210295468403131,"score_spread":0.19439510383686562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283275979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041854107,0.024267137,0.00075890624,0.00491261,0.0008356667,0.00006832443,0.0038568792,0.00022141528,0.96089363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028487707,0.008728639,0.0010007672,0.0013470602,0.0000509219,0.00003544542,0.0013277237,0.00011677547,0.958905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996445,0.0000214715,0.000008274008,0.00007193016,0.0001349411,0.00011899565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996094,0.000031773314,0.000014178961,0.000016622665,0.0002530313,0.00007504197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017943197,0.000648482,0.00034552763,0.0013493064,0.0068156417,0.0041438206,0.00090183335,0.0010887935,0.14712541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056180794,0.00028166163,0.00031664062,0.0036124003,0.0010386929,0.0010471735,0.0007722007,0.0011699783,0.014367134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038711212,0.00002881787,0.0018529701,0.00035111638,0.000014123174,0.0004866115,0.0013306721,0.00055616465,0.00064485107,0.13117094,0.6883038,0.17522117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028159889,0.0000025343816,0.0013180628,0.00006991739,0.0000022856632,0.00006315611,0.00026865717,0.000060882903,0.00006466375,0.00054259424,0.9975988,0.0000056671684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98722386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14712541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048557132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04317098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4921835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283323381","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198870463.003.0010","title":"Canada—Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Spouse; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Property (philosophy); Ecological succession","score_opus":0.03000852938235308,"score_gpt":0.2140409123159066,"score_spread":0.18403238293355353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283323381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001590115,0.010489582,0.0003343318,0.004018119,0.0007326041,0.00003994898,0.0018852054,0.0001251872,0.9807849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071061626,0.004092576,0.00037422354,0.0006967049,0.000043015538,0.00001581744,0.00055061805,0.00006882187,0.98705196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947554,0.000019504672,0.0000117526815,0.00008687626,0.00024369164,0.00016267969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955267,0.000021105212,0.000014061167,0.000019285766,0.0002724359,0.00012043321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020619665,0.0006303636,0.0003432689,0.0014016798,0.008530256,0.004919454,0.00090928725,0.0013032729,0.17329726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000567693,0.0003548096,0.0002855879,0.0041188663,0.0013789212,0.0015328352,0.0012399135,0.0011543933,0.027273282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026041496,0.000011733043,0.0006726049,0.00021136919,0.0000043261944,0.00028857848,0.0012177327,0.00015465972,0.00037674702,0.10341192,0.8057789,0.087845504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010499105,0.0000010548604,0.00037779426,0.000026370355,8.329232e-7,0.00002741118,0.00016018387,0.000014528025,0.000029250794,0.0004133104,0.9989459,0.0000023648956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9661058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99319917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17329726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054153893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05900738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57973707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284878679","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7391","title":"Incomplete Justice: The Costs of Partial Indemnity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Mistake; Misconduct; Economic Justice; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07634989612343603,"score_gpt":0.3785023178552912,"score_spread":0.3021524217318552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284878679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0971954,0.0038250154,0.027895791,0.053991728,0.0003949019,0.00010618437,0.00017998966,0.00010871326,0.8163023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95702004,0.0013196229,0.0028614856,0.0050285747,0.00027164648,0.00007741185,0.000046310328,0.00006835861,0.033306498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864313,0.0032361648,0.00051318033,0.0012175083,0.006397532,0.002204293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854563,0.0062572677,0.0012940438,0.002695439,0.0031019698,0.0011950072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006583136,0.00033362655,0.00064546836,0.0012887685,0.0056864303,0.010905959,0.002039967,0.0035233833,0.008164933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025349388,0.00053024257,0.0005007431,0.00091216,0.022748102,0.009927716,0.0068284906,0.006022805,0.0006290624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015888023,0.000012458981,0.0012688226,0.000029600023,0.000011028416,0.000100480545,0.0008587155,0.0004891999,0.00011233418,0.9785348,0.0038455895,0.014721057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024016208,0.000057779493,0.00567908,0.00035455378,0.000042770058,0.00036350146,0.001542951,0.0016607279,0.00048104572,0.8653422,0.12439993,0.000051427403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061396826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09771942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061396826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014949536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014877676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122078955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285171280","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4096183","title":"Set-Off and Penalties in the Common Law (Rechtsdurchsetzung durch Aufrechnung und Vertragsstrafe im Common Law)","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.020397547506952017,"score_gpt":0.3124834669237988,"score_spread":0.2920859194168468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285171280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049906757,0.005357191,0.15497488,0.048792284,0.0016564868,0.0002924075,0.00047437032,0.00019022383,0.73835534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751605,0.0015073499,0.020078951,0.004278264,0.00081031857,0.00039442128,0.000083597464,0.00012510594,0.09756158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97883624,0.008391806,0.0015152841,0.003710312,0.0046836743,0.0028627096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878088,0.0075635673,0.0010475387,0.0018955185,0.0012608813,0.00042362916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012738451,0.00064536073,0.0014065016,0.0022818258,0.006883256,0.01704161,0.0032437672,0.019398889,0.013510822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03386263,0.0011492644,0.0017864065,0.002712069,0.034837004,0.016412867,0.008247097,0.015639698,0.0016613101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003597285,0.0000046094474,0.000028221431,0.0000053967715,0.0000015331665,0.000019036263,0.0001247238,0.0002909067,0.000017089467,0.997764,0.00074865017,0.0009922407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008594176,0.000008217247,0.000098773606,0.000034818164,0.000005427769,0.000030258681,0.000083741696,0.0011916008,0.00008677219,0.99168164,0.0067501315,0.000019920277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03212089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022699365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03212089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009643753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012404452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06997061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285339988","doi":"10.5347/isonomia.v0i55.487","title":"Legal Positivism as a Theory of Law’s Existence","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Positivism; Philosophy; Legal positivism; Political science; Legal realism; Legal research; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.033529858301173526,"score_gpt":0.32815659370454997,"score_spread":0.29462673540337647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285339988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04729126,0.01300594,0.16135274,0.09931416,0.0011194337,0.00011815916,0.00021945652,0.00020444578,0.6773744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499706,0.0030266824,0.016580828,0.003296922,0.0006746113,0.00019141969,0.00006984044,0.000069324706,0.026119767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409604,0.0034583893,0.00022630922,0.00069734344,0.0011241374,0.00039767433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993718,0.004064872,0.00052674155,0.0006301266,0.0007108852,0.00034925918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006978862,0.00046292384,0.0005648513,0.002760539,0.00363622,0.009596935,0.0016634389,0.0034380925,0.0045257867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007186888,0.00044346886,0.0009287622,0.0014425555,0.053868894,0.010558984,0.0034032154,0.005635575,0.0006864677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010215124,0.0000016303233,0.000037010705,0.00000766241,7.5241195e-7,0.0000058662117,0.00032209183,0.00008278103,0.000010439,0.9987986,0.0002684242,0.00046369902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039187953,0.0000036584854,0.000081294136,0.000024853134,0.0000017226075,0.000012387479,0.00025405255,0.00027234686,0.00003435032,0.9915029,0.0078048,0.0000036828708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055733463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041957838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009596935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008569436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006174678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06217587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285370838","doi":"10.54648/erpl2021032","title":"The Nature of the Beneficiary’s Interest in English, Japanese and Quebec Trusts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Trust law; Property (philosophy); Blind trust; Settlor; Express trust; Perspective (graphical); Business; Law; Property rights; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019536728055711928,"score_gpt":0.28135694679351547,"score_spread":0.26182021873780353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285370838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64636075,0.0039963564,0.0017184214,0.013710099,0.00009033539,0.000062500134,0.00019573278,0.000014650015,0.33385125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99147123,0.00044460906,0.000090464586,0.00050743105,0.000010987961,0.0000140505745,0.000021813901,0.0000048728657,0.0074344943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946104,0.0011281858,0.0001772611,0.00026264158,0.0012157536,0.0026056974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99085,0.0031998248,0.0010434898,0.00030003392,0.0023313013,0.002275397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047196075,0.00015744647,0.0003299762,0.0014828079,0.007124457,0.0069191125,0.0010711557,0.0018081985,0.0042082723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010717029,0.00022001189,0.00032012883,0.0018113408,0.01214666,0.0034446698,0.0031576606,0.0023061761,0.00023114649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017872184,0.00006054705,0.026499009,0.00012984792,0.000038964074,0.0013072733,0.08510362,0.00023584781,0.0007331998,0.8632219,0.00598074,0.016510392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001603366,0.00023610292,0.36808413,0.0013994912,0.00034397517,0.0013082292,0.27434343,0.0025355641,0.0015224909,0.068506666,0.2812757,0.00028385952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7904931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87456965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7904931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039615776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022030272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4214815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285488683","doi":"10.54648/eulr2021002","title":"Origins, Evolution and Comparison of Moral Rights between Civil and Common Law Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Business Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Civil rights; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06619828532321455,"score_gpt":0.338041073248979,"score_spread":0.27184278792576444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285488683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5147884,0.0044608605,0.021222062,0.006226162,0.00014744973,0.00010109051,0.000073227464,0.000044009503,0.45293677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941281,0.00042873708,0.0018899717,0.00009251413,0.000037503527,0.00002269079,0.000019649418,0.000023822735,0.0033569855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98956186,0.0058722734,0.00027271884,0.0014393727,0.0017839251,0.0010699177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869039,0.007050665,0.0017874984,0.0015707806,0.0016047049,0.0010823694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00921951,0.00020933869,0.00033432132,0.0044614174,0.0038495336,0.011735434,0.0013126414,0.001503522,0.005663567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023067096,0.00029881956,0.00029582877,0.002902454,0.033581544,0.011461453,0.0053740107,0.0023690546,0.00053209136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035071997,0.00003916499,0.0044814367,0.000035867804,0.000010504896,0.00010862804,0.044873443,0.00021603325,0.00032381297,0.92627144,0.00027784467,0.023326665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004101461,0.00015644553,0.04187637,0.00036976996,0.000021658247,0.00048387574,0.04205987,0.0020621486,0.0008840795,0.82862717,0.08335297,0.00006455015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031113545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019415193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011735434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070687006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002549035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051287174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285665165","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198854159.001.0001","title":"The Principles of Equity &amp; Trusts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Equity (law); Doctrine; Law; Constructive trust; Settlor; Duty; Common law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0967278319668677,"score_gpt":0.30384906586099586,"score_spread":0.20712123389412818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285665165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013736933,0.0056266855,0.008683934,0.02085466,0.00084710453,0.000047125177,0.000088150555,0.000057083387,0.9624216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21220219,0.010827923,0.008097819,0.00925908,0.0014896546,0.00025296357,0.00014313517,0.00013865439,0.75758857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621886,0.0011733087,0.00015457573,0.00028664118,0.001731124,0.0004354268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984332,0.000648005,0.0001749626,0.00020260434,0.000404745,0.00013646075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020422272,0.00043905436,0.00031243108,0.00082014734,0.0032459109,0.009350655,0.0008505231,0.0029525917,0.011325057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005454071,0.0003985581,0.00033009576,0.0011711261,0.01545644,0.0073576192,0.003164246,0.004996345,0.004731581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.7762317e-7,0.0000017417586,0.000017779312,0.000010902076,5.292964e-7,0.0000119469205,0.00032193086,0.00004658542,0.000012015317,0.97983587,0.016325606,0.0034142158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034415996,0.0000053337485,0.00012836364,0.00011540763,0.0000019659676,0.00007855577,0.0004846669,0.0002423391,0.00006539488,0.435718,0.5631503,0.0000062451036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009008932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072904127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011325057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067408984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064147343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04890889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285675853","doi":"10.54648/erpl2020017","title":"Private Governance and the Potential of Private Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Private law; Rulemaking; Business; Law and economics; Public law; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.018484747588068326,"score_gpt":0.26851715926120695,"score_spread":0.2500324116731386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285675853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052854944,0.030992739,0.074130625,0.15594618,0.00071088964,0.0001562319,0.00018328999,0.00010731508,0.6849178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701376,0.0062154555,0.0056116357,0.0057518473,0.0007845305,0.00014555697,0.00005657671,0.000035591875,0.011261188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9797575,0.0109929815,0.00063194876,0.002692704,0.0036868243,0.0022381155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96979594,0.02065283,0.002019356,0.0044201454,0.0020250957,0.0010865771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021965938,0.00044082117,0.00087161566,0.002707205,0.006215608,0.017046172,0.0018021143,0.010117381,0.004141891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02128464,0.000596507,0.0009997555,0.0023039763,0.068601355,0.016236631,0.0085115,0.0072423946,0.00056459376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010741073,0.0000029487392,0.000047445905,0.000008896782,0.0000017480033,0.000010464102,0.00020283945,0.00011373065,0.00001091873,0.9983191,0.00027487028,0.0010059717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072338144,0.000007528622,0.00016753734,0.00011107589,0.0000037393706,0.000027353031,0.0003873269,0.00031793123,0.00003680381,0.9798396,0.019087417,0.00000640156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005143221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032290816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021965938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009106487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012704722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11616838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286662954","doi":"10.1017/9781139020305.006","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286662954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005877453,0.0031577419,0.0030817478,0.0041016913,0.005553604,0.00065334,0.15362518,0.004249739,0.82498926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015039016,0.004258822,0.0016853928,0.0011609752,0.0015165124,0.00032603653,0.073369786,0.0015416011,0.9146369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841595,0.000120547295,0.00020768664,0.00019426063,0.0009355097,0.0001260683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933428,0.00090859545,0.00039913075,0.00067995966,0.0038834116,0.00078597927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010953592,0.0011942402,0.0012227264,0.012263203,0.0016543808,0.0059659677,0.0015484802,0.0011332715,0.8323261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012299077,0.00045928947,0.000613585,0.013348152,0.0005564173,0.0047791805,0.002389161,0.0014220773,0.7882756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014081803,0.000015984584,0.000123689,0.00033318947,0.0000020358586,0.000018811932,0.00004376463,0.000045739143,0.00014314182,0.0023310215,0.9485637,0.048364803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020589027,0.0000061895485,0.00027169485,0.00012683094,0.000001433871,0.000020854277,0.000029980423,0.000016632726,0.00005402022,0.0007904528,0.998676,0.000003797603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006291428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005858772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16767389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026352748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030070022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288076586","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4164118","title":"Possession, Relativity of Title and Ownership in English Law by Luke Rostill (Book Review)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Law; Theory of relativity; Political science; Theoretical physics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.009819476829125637,"score_gpt":0.28742540961619906,"score_spread":0.2776059327870734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288076586","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046092324,0.9240629,0.0006028103,0.04764105,0.003334433,0.000009966467,0.00010728683,0.000020991472,0.023759715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013917752,0.8701081,0.001021248,0.022054084,0.008763538,0.00007046175,0.00020347018,0.00007535178,0.08378599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942845,0.00014794798,0.000037590096,0.00010651497,0.00024507943,0.00003429999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984647,0.0010980397,0.00008549715,0.000044561653,0.00027329673,0.00003399866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010376673,0.00043983918,0.0006484298,0.002517132,0.0010426105,0.002740496,0.0007142989,0.0021280008,0.009879902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003573781,0.00051696587,0.00019463508,0.0034606056,0.0036368782,0.006710595,0.0014002828,0.0028670414,0.003440745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019190757,0.000024921568,0.00022948308,0.0010185158,0.000016160207,0.000044676905,0.00046621534,0.00013789897,0.00012370312,0.08077208,0.7380773,0.17906982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009574634,0.000015027901,0.0012420351,0.0021729453,0.000018773577,0.000148706,0.00029839092,0.00006586529,0.000119872595,0.026121125,0.96976984,0.000017899014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013668049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026251333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013668049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023315183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027149622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03305161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288685648","doi":"10.1007/s10991-022-09299-2","title":"Contract Negotiations and the Common Law: A Move to Good Faith in Commercial Contracting?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Liverpool Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Good faith; Negotiation; Common law; Duty; Political science; Faith; Fair dealing; Bad faith; Convention; Theology","score_opus":0.022067277369118656,"score_gpt":0.32435443073504233,"score_spread":0.30228715336592366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288685648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06369989,0.008048979,0.06114189,0.33650595,0.0010895986,0.0001286364,0.000053004103,0.0000889304,0.5292431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689113,0.0013975844,0.0037825666,0.011399852,0.00038303455,0.000055376102,0.00001533461,0.000053175554,0.014001913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96055573,0.0215845,0.0012815777,0.0036231426,0.008510003,0.004445053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9255577,0.048752714,0.004136658,0.0084177945,0.008830443,0.004304684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036539584,0.00039143884,0.00086783915,0.0020514638,0.0145011535,0.028203921,0.0039389734,0.015380144,0.008821768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061778296,0.0007037809,0.00084942736,0.0031345182,0.13732159,0.029520897,0.013900927,0.022356717,0.00078034523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036680433,0.0000053540853,0.00007775686,0.000010930304,0.0000012161739,0.0000443079,0.0048390916,0.000055908236,0.000022747972,0.99256986,0.0008974468,0.0014718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017925278,0.000019083143,0.00042595746,0.0003832367,0.000005952658,0.00015243259,0.017851816,0.0008359227,0.00015774388,0.90063566,0.07948172,0.000032504424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085779086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037578676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085779086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02824197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03351615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20491081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289450774","doi":"10.7202/1090691ar","title":"L’exercice du pouvoir discrétionnaire dans les fiducies testamentaires au Québec : recourir à l’affectation pour concilier l’intention du testateur et la décision de la « personne raisonnable »","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"DuPont (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01406085831492147,"score_gpt":0.27914334614749486,"score_spread":0.2650824878325734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289450774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8676545,0.0010194936,0.0028009668,0.009008778,0.00008374747,0.00003202044,0.00008484123,0.000020357042,0.11929534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98444724,0.00016426558,0.00027283753,0.00040288852,0.0000055150076,0.000006369098,0.000016118023,0.0000065080226,0.014678231],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997526,0.0008124431,0.000050825754,0.0002681382,0.0007127792,0.0006299328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994915,0.0014511165,0.0007168105,0.00028177036,0.0015525336,0.0010827543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020736577,0.00024084441,0.00021830887,0.0006853986,0.009567592,0.004385011,0.00089875207,0.0014845569,0.008685013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060646688,0.00021993386,0.00020959313,0.0007320976,0.00707106,0.0011021511,0.0015239612,0.0024812662,0.00041106855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023318223,0.00026483706,0.2436276,0.00019377207,0.00009048405,0.0018761331,0.4255212,0.0013041059,0.0054325084,0.20940337,0.019865377,0.09218748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031795913,0.00012507376,0.5788957,0.000392202,0.00007202315,0.0005092729,0.2189411,0.0025495163,0.0017327841,0.010762971,0.18579689,0.00019068307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93743217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97410786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06256783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02920339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02086852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2118864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294929074","doi":"10.1017/9781108923286.011","title":"Index","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03137731620715978,"score_gpt":0.26929102680918493,"score_spread":0.23791371060202515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294929074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000549641,0.0028459998,0.0030564684,0.003622735,0.005000326,0.0006040656,0.14357452,0.003979405,0.8367668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014506764,0.0038512996,0.0016795369,0.0010322479,0.0013875831,0.00031454983,0.06861338,0.0015468068,0.92012393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853575,0.00011413578,0.0001829925,0.00018434894,0.0008670643,0.00011579449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939797,0.0008427549,0.00034261154,0.0006262903,0.0034994686,0.0007093629],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010364307,0.0011756344,0.0012075998,0.01165674,0.0016026022,0.0056474917,0.0015129809,0.0010935647,0.8295615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113092745,0.00045340022,0.0005956216,0.012860363,0.000526304,0.0046433946,0.00224396,0.0013528423,0.7879539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013643693,0.000015528894,0.00012097519,0.00031607918,0.000001958439,0.000018458632,0.000043213597,0.00004859219,0.0001424557,0.0024281759,0.94840693,0.04844407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019389508,0.0000058978576,0.00026359025,0.00011622746,0.0000013642031,0.00002011766,0.000029055895,0.000017356486,0.000052825297,0.0008215225,0.99866664,0.0000035067105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006150056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005747399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17043853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002540751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026364382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295008979","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v12n1p51","title":"Abolishing the Office of Lord Chancellor","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Management; Medicine; History; Economics","score_opus":0.15133768310110957,"score_gpt":0.46981333312230444,"score_spread":0.3184756500211949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295008979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018319998,0.010945758,0.0034069265,0.25850317,0.01847435,0.00018237649,0.00036548843,0.00021152776,0.68959033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2414115,0.002276453,0.0027412719,0.2786552,0.0064957654,0.000305876,0.0002240649,0.00018578839,0.46770412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97851264,0.0040343627,0.0012552455,0.0019971489,0.008558448,0.00564215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867567,0.004439587,0.0012035924,0.0016537019,0.0036200522,0.0023264026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013315228,0.0005040839,0.00087406574,0.0007473799,0.0072123795,0.0061537847,0.0020868517,0.01759537,0.010919685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034951273,0.000711648,0.0008902865,0.0005693321,0.00729316,0.0040898677,0.0061138156,0.018680621,0.0038649512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009133887,0.000064196254,0.0015205989,0.000118446376,0.000027112086,0.0003164612,0.0013616177,0.0001297244,0.0008051304,0.6738936,0.29887325,0.022798654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051003943,0.00007123536,0.0033160064,0.00020366721,0.000031391588,0.00027421137,0.0005271847,0.00014776776,0.0011231584,0.025286697,0.96889347,0.00007414593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046046544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07742411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046046544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042309524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018871404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091557086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296824521","doi":"10.4324/9781003139614-22","title":"Notes from the periphery","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; History","score_opus":0.05423582788297486,"score_gpt":0.29695769345345013,"score_spread":0.24272186557047526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296824521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009991557,0.0060084797,0.0008007323,0.006363644,0.00095674477,0.000008305345,0.000038173705,0.000030522948,0.9847942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051054846,0.0068518724,0.0009578148,0.005763753,0.00089167163,0.000031575262,0.000081423925,0.00018593401,0.9341811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993488,0.0001593618,0.000015195312,0.00014710924,0.00024999768,0.00007954321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996271,0.00013388497,0.000013335313,0.00005162104,0.00011931334,0.0000546971],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052319065,0.00049172255,0.00031676076,0.0010721516,0.0058035473,0.007571066,0.00063011586,0.0018163311,0.046651766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013970135,0.00021578064,0.00027581502,0.0011564917,0.00707393,0.008412922,0.003681273,0.0051796734,0.0118230665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009201546,0.000007967255,0.000055799697,0.000046288787,8.936387e-7,0.00007679375,0.0038475713,0.000046064415,0.00012176922,0.85502976,0.124252364,0.016505638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013944762,0.0000030920169,0.00008724521,0.00008847126,7.683181e-7,0.00006168366,0.0011159295,0.000033680735,0.00005616393,0.043414306,0.9551349,0.0000023318387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021029979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038558844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9533482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062536392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030010953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15606564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297470818","doi":"10.1017/9781009063814.016","title":"General Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.032540023564774985,"score_gpt":0.2419149097349429,"score_spread":0.20937488617016792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297470818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031976367,0.005981469,0.0023103277,0.0028532846,0.003798512,0.000532848,0.049219094,0.003142531,0.93184215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00082093297,0.006355144,0.0011005959,0.00097014173,0.0011032384,0.00023006591,0.023916535,0.0010369532,0.96446633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928266,0.00005162796,0.00006570301,0.00011412545,0.00042545065,0.0000603877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978428,0.0003215434,0.00012432832,0.00023071107,0.0011134186,0.00036729325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066079845,0.001047186,0.0013003398,0.009103308,0.0012716794,0.00504902,0.0018208363,0.0013301825,0.80806506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004817183,0.0006088252,0.00051967846,0.012410407,0.0005276499,0.0044383286,0.0018996376,0.001601732,0.75574917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081466,0.000022193719,0.00006922609,0.0002971606,0.0000012432125,0.000019133202,0.000031300937,0.000047539073,0.00012625266,0.0028020064,0.94171923,0.054856487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014221554,0.00000465085,0.00017305643,0.000101494865,8.278951e-7,0.000025520223,0.000015172608,0.000011660466,0.000025698584,0.0007520691,0.9988858,0.0000026423004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050543603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063777906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19193494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021895752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002064404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27377182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297489070","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwac036","title":"The Voluntary Sterilisation Act: Best Interests, Caregivers, and Disability Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Best interests; Eugenics; Commonwealth; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Compromise; Human rights; Convention; Sociology","score_opus":0.026144583086995854,"score_gpt":0.3358336273762773,"score_spread":0.30968904428928146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297489070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028045295,0.060967803,0.008745052,0.56453156,0.0013158016,0.00008394681,0.000117172036,0.000029295607,0.33616418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8387031,0.03944166,0.00478293,0.08397759,0.0017877865,0.00023793033,0.000082166094,0.000023478739,0.030963384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820386,0.011048508,0.0010242179,0.00074229384,0.0035470165,0.0015993679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858614,0.010516029,0.0012985202,0.0005031477,0.001077805,0.00074307824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017929941,0.00043286392,0.0006357866,0.0014963982,0.0045089363,0.008239285,0.0014554067,0.01257896,0.003182379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024417643,0.00036207866,0.0004801949,0.001576438,0.027793016,0.006673137,0.0053675305,0.008461663,0.00041405947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039544902,0.000006449734,0.00024886415,0.000041771145,0.0000022508123,0.00011136518,0.0015897918,0.00009079883,0.000028070874,0.9883928,0.004451686,0.0050322115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026268253,0.000056530676,0.0022474302,0.002033409,0.000021019134,0.00061488483,0.0068820566,0.0005973669,0.00028628812,0.69623715,0.29093695,0.00006064249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023403984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031642303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023403984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076216934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017039806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09482372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297634351","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190887353.013.21","title":"Life and Other Basic Rights in Anscombe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Dignity; Argument (complex analysis); Transcendental number; Metaphysics; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.035307277935864155,"score_gpt":0.24278986073553166,"score_spread":0.2074825827996675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297634351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010606669,0.006790674,0.004475167,0.016511578,0.00039111817,0.00003478861,0.00003336376,0.000020096886,0.96113646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7300751,0.006344175,0.0037111659,0.007877031,0.0004916386,0.00014635551,0.000060691575,0.000043405766,0.25125033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731416,0.0013410674,0.00010095185,0.000329984,0.00057522417,0.0003386548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981834,0.00089062814,0.00010068855,0.00025125264,0.00035285042,0.00022122612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029159498,0.0003666963,0.0004390288,0.00093397073,0.0051189186,0.006792769,0.00073879777,0.0038047892,0.008397248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034054401,0.00026152722,0.0002484354,0.0008952022,0.03503232,0.009250984,0.0072383094,0.0055151815,0.00096549327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016343463,0.000005229434,0.000023036253,0.000007951192,4.0305343e-7,0.000026702473,0.0012473607,0.00003077882,0.000023535451,0.99534625,0.0014503984,0.0018367505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005299427,0.000010376269,0.00019948371,0.00007786374,0.0000013042707,0.00006765822,0.0010108127,0.00011177052,0.000097778844,0.7689228,0.2294835,0.00001139269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013421756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015695551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013421756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051312065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034847623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037229657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299655356","doi":"10.1093/clp/cuw014","title":"Massively Discretionary Trusts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Legal Problems","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Property (philosophy); Express trust; Law; Trust law; Constitution; Business; Blind trust; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07345307859784406,"score_gpt":0.38955188301024496,"score_spread":0.3160988044124009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299655356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07841737,0.0034102874,0.35395426,0.046762105,0.0011732085,0.00051123026,0.00020920328,0.0005444912,0.5150179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90998673,0.0010624672,0.037082624,0.0023600138,0.00045124328,0.00018045644,0.00007601192,0.000109608416,0.048690777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.967632,0.011937986,0.0030238307,0.0047465926,0.010317106,0.0023425291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93460345,0.030068573,0.0063677602,0.017214306,0.009013598,0.0027323442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030306464,0.00047064354,0.00059171877,0.0013996923,0.008033442,0.011539871,0.002036456,0.0048232377,0.0072037904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06435137,0.000746088,0.00086201826,0.0014516445,0.018547276,0.011007781,0.00850385,0.006276011,0.0015528714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007474487,0.000006749231,0.000327473,0.000025617106,0.0000064286123,0.00017007037,0.0031815583,0.00030121137,0.00016619313,0.9847408,0.0026289704,0.008437573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021819948,0.00003951881,0.0007887411,0.00022877284,0.00002431038,0.0005117273,0.0014643815,0.0024273247,0.0006887813,0.8331491,0.16060527,0.000050381554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006226864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00747071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030306464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007031734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009744241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16027778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300969943","doi":"10.1017/9781009063760.024","title":"General Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.032540023564774985,"score_gpt":0.2419149097349429,"score_spread":0.20937488617016792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300969943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031976367,0.005981469,0.0023103277,0.0028532846,0.003798512,0.000532848,0.049219094,0.003142531,0.93184215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00082093297,0.006355144,0.0011005959,0.00097014173,0.0011032384,0.00023006591,0.023916535,0.0010369532,0.96446633],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928266,0.00005162796,0.00006570301,0.00011412545,0.00042545065,0.0000603877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978428,0.0003215434,0.00012432832,0.00023071107,0.0011134186,0.00036729325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066079845,0.001047186,0.0013003398,0.009103308,0.0012716794,0.00504902,0.0018208363,0.0013301825,0.80806506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004817183,0.0006088252,0.00051967846,0.012410407,0.0005276499,0.0044383286,0.0018996376,0.001601732,0.75574917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081466,0.000022193719,0.00006922609,0.0002971606,0.0000012432125,0.000019133202,0.000031300937,0.000047539073,0.00012625266,0.0028020064,0.94171923,0.054856487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014221554,0.00000465085,0.00017305643,0.000101494865,8.278951e-7,0.000025520223,0.000015172608,0.000011660466,0.000025698584,0.0007520691,0.9988858,0.0000026423004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050543603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063777906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19193494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021895752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002064404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27377182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302094076","doi":"","title":"DIVISIONS AND SEGREGATIONS OF THE PATRIMONY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.32638974359305156,"score_gpt":0.6012905631752379,"score_spread":0.2749008195821863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302094076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22279331,0.006075001,0.094072655,0.0066646454,0.0006890413,0.00031313623,0.00018764993,0.00021563243,0.66898894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92978764,0.0008572713,0.017787298,0.0006062473,0.00019455484,0.00014588017,0.000081883656,0.00013767456,0.050401673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873864,0.0029147665,0.0008123687,0.0026882451,0.0042854385,0.0019127798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931612,0.001292504,0.0012155965,0.0021693737,0.0012724213,0.00088900427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050457353,0.00051916705,0.00074723817,0.003212831,0.0062757013,0.012201642,0.0012367453,0.0018412977,0.010596633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016123869,0.0007702671,0.00069609995,0.0025426308,0.030026274,0.0067298454,0.008528281,0.004031746,0.0027839656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006973216,0.00002324464,0.0014939595,0.00005175288,0.0000127665635,0.00024149787,0.00774105,0.00018411248,0.0007599505,0.9571647,0.002668769,0.029588513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006970464,0.00014256204,0.017018005,0.00057586894,0.00004942973,0.0012298486,0.009217705,0.0019355377,0.0018500725,0.741338,0.22647187,0.00010144035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057771592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004916913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012201642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050809267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036123968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036864877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4305014601","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0047","title":"Private law legalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Private law; Law; Political science; Rationality; Private rights; Law and economics; Public law; Property rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015386625497086276,"score_gpt":0.24837166932680332,"score_spread":0.23298504382971705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4305014601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029856682,0.0026249278,0.079687856,0.10757076,0.0007301462,0.00011793597,0.00016918537,0.00012635933,0.77911615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326283,0.0009973824,0.011997541,0.01206674,0.00079444615,0.00015174501,0.00007839598,0.00006411039,0.04122132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880598,0.0037533105,0.00038648993,0.0024261614,0.003997282,0.0013769341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059814,0.0040239748,0.00075167173,0.0018482395,0.0019521904,0.00082575146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010841492,0.0003971648,0.0005460178,0.00093658257,0.006139398,0.009972995,0.0016706159,0.0072389673,0.0056023407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014782379,0.00048604017,0.0007136743,0.0006595125,0.04613497,0.0077240025,0.0052892286,0.007929179,0.00083293504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001698829,0.000002580916,0.00004098698,0.000006783454,0.0000011855734,0.000012635532,0.0003585283,0.00005149374,0.000027425662,0.9977869,0.0009989659,0.0007108769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012654973,0.000008208716,0.00017319722,0.00004473619,0.0000056219446,0.000053049796,0.00029123042,0.0004925289,0.00017338099,0.95186347,0.046873562,0.000008279366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0127203725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009220807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127203725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012380344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010546193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08982611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306643343","doi":"10.32388/p3k0i5","title":"Review of: \"Geach’s “Good” and “Bad”, Attributive After All\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Attributive; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06162447648301926,"score_gpt":0.39503883054386263,"score_spread":0.33341435406084335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306643343","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001946972,0.019326894,0.013199938,0.6037415,0.11996689,0.00064422,0.0011733946,0.0007487057,0.23925143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061061453,0.018477641,0.015324943,0.21075003,0.049876217,0.0013352593,0.0013989934,0.0013345203,0.64044094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95304763,0.013456438,0.0031711783,0.003491576,0.02522043,0.0016127971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8184134,0.046598222,0.004733684,0.014461111,0.111485116,0.0043084165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03614652,0.0009052602,0.0021929115,0.007826835,0.008952581,0.01644833,0.0035776566,0.014173739,0.03005257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21556175,0.0009201611,0.00087400456,0.0038993096,0.014090483,0.00934769,0.0051852074,0.0081248395,0.026293198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000879242,0.000008630495,0.00011887985,0.00019887334,0.00001185787,0.00004720058,0.00043640437,0.00003361395,0.0000883418,0.061795745,0.9171075,0.020144211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069551465,0.000006396123,0.0005200225,0.00040675548,0.000018306135,0.000087000335,0.00032185446,0.00015955821,0.0002420983,0.021898292,0.97630924,0.0000235719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01723302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030177854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03614652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074289595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033211082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19116336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306863431","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198754183.001.0001","title":"Reciprocal Freedom","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Comparative law; Law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Municipal law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03521161311166615,"score_gpt":0.3139180534021201,"score_spread":0.27870644029045394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306863431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083872135,0.0017867519,0.0045405277,0.0025944754,0.0002924767,0.000013872201,0.000050565402,0.00003339181,0.9898491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.218493,0.005747028,0.005343125,0.0038058928,0.0010077921,0.0001776055,0.0003349649,0.00017335698,0.76491725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980447,0.00072643603,0.00005184586,0.00035175218,0.00066187774,0.0001633698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989361,0.00042685636,0.000049044,0.0002817608,0.0002311948,0.0000750594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011183743,0.00053958246,0.00041593405,0.0010230439,0.0027600678,0.005597582,0.0007808544,0.0015661826,0.03809607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002336058,0.00022607649,0.00041831587,0.00086672726,0.009565735,0.005639767,0.0033482506,0.0033152355,0.0070291706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016143973,0.0000026643806,0.000009301988,0.000010115322,7.0606933e-7,0.000009213102,0.0002542256,0.00005492758,0.000018438921,0.9898259,0.006692184,0.003120793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033692168,0.00000571779,0.000060486167,0.0000894522,0.0000023575717,0.00007563958,0.0002707146,0.00018079071,0.00013565745,0.47871304,0.52045816,0.000004731502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026456523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024900497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03809607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040623867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021365962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12744403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W430697676","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1064","title":"See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Remedy No Evil: How the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal is Failing to Protect the Most Fundamental Rights of Residential Tenants","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Fair Housing Act; Renting; Rental housing; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Civil rights","score_opus":0.03292165400689023,"score_gpt":0.32288142651925045,"score_spread":0.2899597725123602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W430697676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087738246,0.009699565,0.0022742087,0.26573768,0.0006450138,0.00008434574,0.0001967712,0.000051372706,0.63357276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8023319,0.0034952327,0.00066372653,0.026656035,0.0001557859,0.000069692505,0.000039227125,0.000042969157,0.16654539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683964,0.00078061974,0.000056177076,0.00023363804,0.0006345577,0.0014552838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856645,0.000507587,0.00010675133,0.00008044868,0.00040143557,0.00033739043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022752255,0.0002695624,0.0002586685,0.0004960619,0.026017822,0.007244671,0.0015634529,0.009355386,0.006419672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042880513,0.00030202026,0.00026849692,0.0008077241,0.023322513,0.0030375794,0.0027775986,0.004461318,0.000646321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024878604,0.000018150857,0.0026174325,0.000084527215,0.000009345648,0.0008660694,0.06053951,0.00021831511,0.0003485139,0.8390808,0.08538592,0.010806574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000487281,0.000032953103,0.014562961,0.00037045823,0.00004418351,0.00021206446,0.08743636,0.00055274786,0.00054753805,0.096723884,0.79939514,0.00007300591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9241551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97928417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075844884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048758835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057014164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35377175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308077846","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2022.70.3.ptp","title":"Personal Tax Planning: Reviewing a Will—Tax Considerations for Non-Legal Advisers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax planning; Business; Estate planning; Accounting; Tax reform; Estate; Perspective (graphical); Estate tax; Law and economics; Tax avoidance; Finance; Double taxation; Public economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.042064240589997755,"score_gpt":0.2767684388159865,"score_spread":0.23470419822598876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308077846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004508315,0.010284884,0.0043805093,0.86420465,0.018601261,0.0006748958,0.000100997975,0.0002787362,0.09696573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15512553,0.03585507,0.040331233,0.4661198,0.031726807,0.0011785375,0.0003685489,0.000548041,0.26874647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95403224,0.014045139,0.0050496385,0.0017282425,0.02133915,0.003805594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7613529,0.0813864,0.010375288,0.007216201,0.118045904,0.021623328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061388586,0.0003409261,0.0007318342,0.0023152758,0.0126315,0.013537573,0.0029498248,0.01613076,0.012046706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2197978,0.00063022727,0.0006617845,0.002272696,0.007462893,0.008167891,0.0033972259,0.011111722,0.0058757598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011195404,0.00003202605,0.0008199186,0.00017445833,0.0000071546388,0.0005797505,0.003622354,0.00008350294,0.00025306744,0.023735667,0.9219271,0.048753835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000808597,0.00002001814,0.001083914,0.00044961637,0.000007251549,0.00046694133,0.0027822512,0.00010454692,0.0001404295,0.005256731,0.98965305,0.000027170461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046146702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11649407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009716355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07639406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32465774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308964972","doi":"10.1515/jtl-2022-0014","title":"Public Nuisance is a Tort","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Tort Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Plaintiff; Political science; Law and economics; Cause of action; Action (physics); Law; Business; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.0883632060783345,"score_gpt":0.33395912214764806,"score_spread":0.24559591606931355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308964972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041096613,0.0053505753,0.043359417,0.18901138,0.0009833648,0.000084673935,0.00016157277,0.00013701589,0.71981543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578151,0.0013828537,0.0017914034,0.010440517,0.0009259495,0.00006461435,0.00003719035,0.00003993711,0.027502328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913264,0.0037703263,0.0002897678,0.0014414464,0.002214111,0.00095793145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870194,0.00722867,0.0015555954,0.0020669051,0.0016139729,0.0005154068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007617612,0.00037843597,0.00082968565,0.0012030688,0.0055877995,0.00986114,0.0010584283,0.011441928,0.010484945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014280523,0.0004229727,0.0007714652,0.0007846574,0.040029544,0.011327566,0.0051124506,0.008852818,0.0012446862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027255144,0.0000071793356,0.00007936709,0.0000088657525,0.000002244649,0.00003002451,0.00037877518,0.000067086155,0.000027763179,0.99697435,0.001670543,0.0007511402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007802726,0.000015151921,0.00028776188,0.00013448288,0.0000106666785,0.00014748576,0.0006094005,0.00042708544,0.00018827339,0.9365456,0.061611943,0.000014243134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033252335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019423993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011441928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055270996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042091133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040286243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309241573","doi":"10.1017/9781009082662","title":"Monetary Redress for Abuse in State Care","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Programming language; Law","score_opus":0.02579847396822454,"score_gpt":0.24867807964555735,"score_spread":0.2228796056773328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309241573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048234016,0.012090924,0.0036112948,0.14705934,0.0020565325,0.00012241915,0.000043305994,0.000083692816,0.78669846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6849068,0.010357648,0.0018459301,0.031239636,0.0005928574,0.0002046279,0.000040312647,0.00006136419,0.27075097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764377,0.0012521474,0.000042537427,0.00010196689,0.00039732578,0.0005622258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987657,0.0007618971,0.00008076241,0.00006493924,0.00011165542,0.00021504173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023465536,0.000194938,0.00019065931,0.00046337084,0.005759441,0.004869995,0.000797946,0.0025552073,0.0077948393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005510936,0.00021781611,0.00024904916,0.00062093936,0.008015583,0.0034639272,0.004279212,0.0037110024,0.00061037706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015244685,0.00006419844,0.00083766005,0.00008036346,0.0000056622266,0.00017673649,0.0413099,0.0003454882,0.00016754583,0.8060941,0.10817609,0.042727012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000133356125,0.000081145845,0.0026747745,0.00062135916,0.000011575015,0.0002143081,0.043293513,0.0004872987,0.00040575553,0.08381115,0.868359,0.000026860052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01919959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04959065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01919959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005192505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007825634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038175642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309241956","doi":"10.1017/9781009177856.038","title":"C. S. Holling (1973)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.043678326066941185,"score_gpt":0.24639725614594904,"score_spread":0.20271893007900785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309241956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074364967,0.14981277,0.0054751015,0.013534909,0.007882208,0.00009306887,0.0015574832,0.00056340883,0.8203374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004292757,0.034876134,0.002794549,0.0026842167,0.0005969963,0.000047505746,0.00045548225,0.00023448846,0.95401794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977356,0.000027761696,0.0000143448415,0.00006592639,0.00009762728,0.000020848862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996717,0.00012310038,0.000022037533,0.000029381179,0.00011235161,0.000041381623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049744104,0.0010242703,0.00047532163,0.0022363428,0.0013786185,0.0020758277,0.0007473351,0.0014654171,0.19706753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011959563,0.00048925093,0.00035098777,0.0024739325,0.0009983092,0.003198566,0.0010653214,0.0017927949,0.13806942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020649462,0.00001697558,0.000118401396,0.00018220002,0.0000032432902,0.00008699247,0.0003446499,0.00008379646,0.00014873681,0.02825955,0.80367243,0.16706242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019656816,0.000004561703,0.00016578562,0.00013805603,0.0000014589104,0.00011665286,0.000052298463,0.000020037374,0.000061189996,0.003511717,0.9959227,0.0000035501548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009051225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029415267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19706753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011807138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016114058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6592566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312662675","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2022.2133266","title":"Property’s limits","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Property (philosophy); Social research; Law; Media studies; Social science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03860603894292137,"score_gpt":0.3169023672304274,"score_spread":0.27829632828750606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312662675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012595988,0.0013796305,0.12533604,0.010932385,0.0013826349,0.0002811684,0.0045024375,0.014793139,0.8287966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45919874,0.003023409,0.077939376,0.004786491,0.0009031946,0.0011572301,0.0085126795,0.014018346,0.43046057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673045,0.00044989245,0.0002077812,0.0006567325,0.0015325976,0.0004225204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98724514,0.004317777,0.000481374,0.00425276,0.0028635412,0.00083947676],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028448666,0.00079442904,0.00087350287,0.0018130133,0.00197757,0.0065959645,0.0019822905,0.0022760222,0.3119535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028328508,0.0007541857,0.0010078513,0.0012815228,0.002125943,0.0148367295,0.0039071348,0.0028995092,0.07712026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032312077,0.000094100076,0.0012449442,0.0004173653,0.000020494244,0.00051897444,0.0010875462,0.00073655276,0.004624988,0.465387,0.32383993,0.20170502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004141942,0.00005228171,0.0011188625,0.00024833812,0.00001646745,0.0007456015,0.00043672635,0.002171565,0.0039197677,0.17072637,0.8204763,0.000046331443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029603045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021282113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3119535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014552528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017132219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9814148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313056760","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198757252.003.0007","title":"Establishing the promisor’s enrichment in Canadian law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Testamentary trust; Unjust enrichment; Context (archaeology); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Order (exchange); Common law; Relevance (law); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02966117380749673,"score_gpt":0.28291379143960493,"score_spread":0.2532526176321082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313056760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008090597,0.0020976658,0.002206443,0.010972163,0.00021670667,0.00005307451,0.00009883647,0.00004118652,0.97622335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5471744,0.0047273673,0.0057267384,0.008456237,0.00023497241,0.00007297873,0.00016319241,0.00007989221,0.43336424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507445,0.00043368776,0.000086562446,0.0004199139,0.002871889,0.0011135311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998041,0.0005199637,0.00006101832,0.0001165201,0.001053158,0.00020832958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029335304,0.00041529498,0.0004043984,0.002703856,0.012550066,0.008345737,0.0018617122,0.0028455604,0.012994607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049147015,0.0004069108,0.00046314078,0.0025056968,0.013052449,0.002567177,0.0033360177,0.0042113485,0.00093843654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004233075,0.0000040729046,0.00021106687,0.00002233495,0.0000016457055,0.00007908595,0.0015460321,0.00020935506,0.00010352091,0.9766912,0.013701456,0.007426122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008754475,0.000013436331,0.0021219724,0.00027663098,0.000020449948,0.00014733966,0.0029785149,0.0011124141,0.0006270017,0.12383286,0.8688044,0.000056196106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95164037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8893168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110683225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1250206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80306673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313065913","doi":"10.47348/slr/2022/i3a4","title":"Lessons From New South Wales, Queensland, and British Columbia to Assist South Africa in Adequately Regulating the Keeping of Assistance Animals by Disabled Persons in Sectional Title Schemes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Service (business); Animal welfare; Medicine; Psychology; Business; Political science; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.05099444966079107,"score_gpt":0.3075253143093743,"score_spread":0.2565308646485832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313065913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12122745,0.02755014,0.0014017781,0.563713,0.0046435343,0.0005527435,0.0002687683,0.00007664996,0.28056595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4734197,0.018123752,0.005598445,0.22907893,0.0007260222,0.0005988555,0.00017176064,0.00013711685,0.27214542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99130744,0.0012542997,0.00045714123,0.0007570558,0.002201161,0.004022949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860588,0.0037529715,0.0005213061,0.00038323045,0.0040319916,0.0052517722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008702412,0.0005847187,0.0004622232,0.0012812231,0.018191991,0.008915491,0.0028375955,0.006753617,0.008948005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010152019,0.0008475485,0.000607503,0.0014870916,0.009247065,0.0043394454,0.0056055454,0.011127384,0.0007654775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015857279,0.000409444,0.0175239,0.0012183529,0.000068475616,0.007358696,0.14553475,0.0009469224,0.0038375643,0.30346102,0.4123043,0.10717802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056606157,0.00006842419,0.034262035,0.00174494,0.000034997884,0.00049294793,0.05970122,0.00018179404,0.00049022783,0.008914032,0.89388657,0.00016629575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9392946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9760464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060705423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037697256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14010195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27351403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313153503","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4082380","title":"Discoverability Demystified","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Medicine; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.014912270113192317,"score_gpt":0.2980510363292291,"score_spread":0.2831387662160368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313153503","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052595157,0.0019076373,0.6589417,0.042274073,0.0017197618,0.00046261234,0.0024427155,0.008928583,0.23072767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69089514,0.0021933191,0.2176862,0.0030047612,0.001471549,0.0005539289,0.0026768798,0.0029736967,0.078544654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.974814,0.005298359,0.0020820694,0.0047149216,0.011485478,0.0016051858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81541574,0.058592897,0.0053218547,0.09654087,0.02045547,0.0036732042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019174397,0.00090764655,0.0019570962,0.009196049,0.0041388394,0.014761262,0.0040108226,0.0041112998,0.019638462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.102351055,0.0014116768,0.0024319296,0.0052705808,0.017407754,0.04504943,0.020002548,0.009548264,0.0069511216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048791004,0.000033216933,0.0007106843,0.00011478354,0.000034027584,0.00014244109,0.0010351684,0.0008699526,0.00077091466,0.9490226,0.005753813,0.04146363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001519255,0.000018393104,0.00024397006,0.0000627422,0.000037008896,0.00024822715,0.00034601687,0.0043209353,0.0019225507,0.9412813,0.05147649,0.000027114427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030380604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017331921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019638462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034564428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008998793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101405144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313644466","doi":"10.1515/npf-2022-0031","title":"Donor Advised Funds &amp; Delay: An Intergenerational Justice Solution?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Economic Justice; Independence (probability theory); Flexibility (engineering); Balance (ability); Context (archaeology); Foundation (evidence); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.07369149747502873,"score_gpt":0.40746149455633746,"score_spread":0.3337699970813087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313644466","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04366221,0.004286498,0.033365816,0.6854461,0.0030633677,0.00014474844,0.00011504375,0.00009969033,0.22981659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88118064,0.0017198359,0.010555466,0.069821745,0.0013538823,0.00025194543,0.00003611949,0.00008600991,0.03499433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98211205,0.009783655,0.0005330268,0.0018508078,0.0028578127,0.002862574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651657,0.020409407,0.0034919793,0.0037741964,0.003926359,0.0032324693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034425754,0.00046827094,0.0005705846,0.0012293028,0.007378946,0.013588943,0.0037259914,0.011807677,0.012599179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06673174,0.00034935513,0.0006444262,0.0014276917,0.014981174,0.013285771,0.010080537,0.0120331785,0.00086917524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020426298,0.000029738118,0.0004930297,0.000031940264,0.00001074122,0.00012127777,0.0016662263,0.00031581355,0.000072422205,0.9750923,0.010765283,0.011380755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053954056,0.000049988703,0.0007082229,0.00061491935,0.00003933774,0.00022833356,0.0048662387,0.0010963251,0.00041935797,0.79135317,0.20051801,0.000052126918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007417583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009807904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034425754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012119137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022094974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18206292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315874156","doi":"","title":"Gavin Drewry, Louis Blom-Cooper, Charles Blake, The Court of Appeal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; History; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.3124337527309165,"score_gpt":0.5575056902350184,"score_spread":0.2450719375041019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315874156","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074400376,0.071846366,0.0014701262,0.80324954,0.004185201,0.00005199985,0.00024747697,0.0000622919,0.11144691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26108137,0.10473403,0.004560235,0.27162525,0.0061056362,0.00018278422,0.00032111263,0.000367549,0.35102206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955863,0.0016948213,0.00016404454,0.0006240143,0.0016175292,0.00031334275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98035896,0.013446969,0.00080562517,0.0003138704,0.0034676548,0.0016069558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005072044,0.00031113037,0.00041785775,0.0020376407,0.009752798,0.009664766,0.0013665388,0.005199555,0.013532022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030108148,0.0005476132,0.00016312371,0.002067427,0.0054970193,0.008297325,0.0027171075,0.008814933,0.003507298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015657959,0.000030054869,0.0014344208,0.000095089184,0.000005962307,0.00014916208,0.0041245637,0.000065412074,0.000070175774,0.15640439,0.8182167,0.019388512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012426236,0.0000119330325,0.004265871,0.0006325917,0.0000069103216,0.00018901375,0.0140007315,0.00019649597,0.00024561037,0.06260904,0.91778606,0.000043263837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040642083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1245444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040642083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062767365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008894049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08081102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641641","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.23","title":"Hadley V. Baxendale: Still Crazy After All These Years? Panel Discussion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel discussion; Law; Political science; Work (physics); Engineering; Philosophy; Mechanical engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05831587978241727,"score_gpt":0.3523340298958521,"score_spread":0.29401815011343485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012592794,0.001971049,0.000111975125,0.97691524,0.006271674,0.000016483853,0.000039282197,0.000008686348,0.013406246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026249,0.0020743974,0.00021113316,0.9493432,0.004014129,0.00006265565,0.000036698784,0.000021812348,0.017987058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98450863,0.006895207,0.0005226025,0.0022906591,0.0027736092,0.0030093107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97371054,0.017320124,0.0007292833,0.0005562355,0.0037494958,0.003934288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030406354,0.0006238513,0.0011408291,0.00094617234,0.02050483,0.016423263,0.004795802,0.047965556,0.021260858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058650825,0.000713301,0.0014691512,0.0015192362,0.008857501,0.0202631,0.006968664,0.049641345,0.0026592226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004944387,0.00003464478,0.00035698927,0.00014517539,0.000013629845,0.00038064565,0.0034745568,0.0000926977,0.00015798667,0.07697532,0.9099309,0.008387985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048707203,0.000048339545,0.0008818023,0.0008377581,0.000027419077,0.00013676475,0.01263547,0.000100407655,0.00020067106,0.03361846,0.95138174,0.00008231401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035084754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06681454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047965556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014565513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02491692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16080612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641762","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i1.1","title":"Theory and Anti-theory in the Work of Allan Farnsworth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art","score_opus":0.022100596165111,"score_gpt":0.3161855854937112,"score_spread":0.29408498932860017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028887852,0.25141263,0.0026501147,0.6286473,0.0052434956,0.000013283272,0.000039515708,0.000027155953,0.109077804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38937473,0.22252253,0.0056541953,0.26061463,0.01596647,0.00022679243,0.00007852235,0.00018089748,0.105381265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922714,0.0051630842,0.00017067647,0.0006696793,0.0012836114,0.000441438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875053,0.010262947,0.0003363252,0.00055891846,0.0008655737,0.0004709147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012494841,0.0006477105,0.0009563071,0.0027696693,0.010720234,0.006629719,0.0013412724,0.0062357453,0.0046150126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014301979,0.00045135862,0.0004820803,0.0022410247,0.03759774,0.011208187,0.0031750586,0.00971953,0.0009945608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009446229,0.000010885179,0.00007582434,0.00006130296,0.000005678003,0.00003288441,0.0015250262,0.00008239395,0.000011592032,0.88813,0.1027888,0.0072662053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137330435,0.000010201619,0.00020585927,0.0005202721,0.000005070789,0.000059490678,0.0010575032,0.00010792196,0.000042432668,0.6070212,0.39094093,0.000015499016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023054646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029972397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023054646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010029182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009965691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07276714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318773428","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.15360","title":"Contract Law’s Red Herring: Exposing “Intention” as a Guise for Consideration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Political science; Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14382678537832502,"score_gpt":0.43763462453772106,"score_spread":0.293807839159396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318773428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07155105,0.005861722,0.15657122,0.077162094,0.0009224189,0.00017492159,0.00006375242,0.00011170187,0.68758106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656185,0.0007703813,0.012851566,0.0065750396,0.0003665694,0.00016754802,0.000023667262,0.00007106808,0.013555641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981191,0.011494012,0.0005202447,0.001100355,0.004120146,0.0015742006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832797,0.01129231,0.001057595,0.0017923167,0.0019043301,0.0006737116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01824693,0.00044941375,0.00045897852,0.0020042935,0.0068321065,0.012362475,0.0017892647,0.0049740523,0.0035042197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024597319,0.0004654899,0.00093404995,0.0014789581,0.05918292,0.012780492,0.005964811,0.008796292,0.00047273072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028747563,0.0000033485078,0.00016236382,0.000007231418,0.0000013458109,0.000022243852,0.0022700839,0.000048116603,0.00002734684,0.9954204,0.00036798514,0.0016666972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075634302,0.00002573015,0.0005279346,0.00013975218,0.000008895783,0.00008392816,0.003972964,0.0006828506,0.00023185642,0.9455477,0.048751302,0.000019555062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00988861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068848594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01824693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00684079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008021333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09650016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319028512","doi":"10.35948/1590-5586/2023.232","title":"La 'certainty of objects' e il potere di nomina nei trust testamentari (Royal Trust Corporation of Canada v The Welfare Institution of the Jews of Athens, 23 agosto 2022)","year":2023,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Trusts","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.016622723002965537,"score_gpt":0.24999560793052417,"score_spread":0.23337288492755864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319028512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0527919,0.010874126,0.003743116,0.08946466,0.0025056207,0.00016687371,0.0016001805,0.00012932107,0.83872426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57296515,0.0020750053,0.0012294175,0.025403226,0.0005460088,0.00011372558,0.00038667672,0.00008854812,0.3971922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98955524,0.0013589563,0.0004040088,0.0013212948,0.0047687115,0.002591801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369496,0.0014370068,0.00042389534,0.00049578573,0.0031201537,0.0008281963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054917037,0.00049904507,0.0005147075,0.0009735322,0.009530476,0.012303916,0.0013306589,0.0072822594,0.014455297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012293575,0.0006835011,0.0005880461,0.0011047613,0.01194646,0.005276416,0.0034824065,0.008204074,0.0025785055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009553576,0.00002957545,0.004246907,0.000080718615,0.000030685842,0.00026735035,0.00841072,0.00012599373,0.00034451124,0.8663694,0.09924286,0.020755686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035868554,0.00006276741,0.015377819,0.00019602897,0.000029846595,0.00017456771,0.0041409116,0.00015793425,0.000482414,0.025273036,0.9539269,0.00014193826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7365548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8438227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2634452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031480327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040804714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5299933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321351784","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12799","title":"Ernest J.Weinrib, Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 240 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reciprocal; Sociology; Law; Library science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04293725953304092,"score_gpt":0.28859468771083135,"score_spread":0.24565742817779043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321351784","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021676732,0.90149564,0.0009783228,0.035491828,0.0032437192,0.000015475604,0.00026014858,0.0000856789,0.058212504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011587066,0.7821711,0.0017202805,0.010907278,0.0036255054,0.00009086166,0.00045382502,0.00023361445,0.18921044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892956,0.00026396633,0.000086515116,0.00015036835,0.00045610813,0.00011338735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987679,0.00080640335,0.000108192005,0.00005257718,0.00014989791,0.0001149009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016652199,0.0016876189,0.00095179403,0.001959122,0.0013961451,0.004659093,0.0012661073,0.004418183,0.057816595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026515306,0.0011486766,0.00047778236,0.00301475,0.0035533921,0.01009406,0.0020974842,0.0049830307,0.024879811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022862887,0.000017313829,0.00010996857,0.0005170978,0.000008618958,0.00008690291,0.00057956215,0.00012841752,0.00007854663,0.052269973,0.86936,0.076820694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008547042,0.000005962656,0.0006702543,0.0010440878,0.000004178394,0.0001357089,0.00046601804,0.0000681753,0.00003363801,0.03586711,0.96168554,0.000010727285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014072443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032572377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057816595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039694845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003263572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19341576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321836540","doi":"10.1017/9781108782975.006","title":"Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03060379322728132,"score_gpt":0.26654101504999245,"score_spread":0.23593722182271112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321836540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080357876,0.009114206,0.0028634917,0.010039558,0.015125179,0.0012017243,0.16191252,0.0034725643,0.7954672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025558723,0.009807784,0.0016072536,0.0018241944,0.004484932,0.0005964144,0.07592161,0.0009919658,0.90221],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985488,0.00011482268,0.00020577967,0.00016911047,0.0008507242,0.000110631336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928929,0.0007776477,0.00041743703,0.0004951258,0.0047673243,0.00064949936],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010256476,0.0010907213,0.0010243113,0.008690302,0.0013987775,0.0057474067,0.0014022739,0.0008925433,0.72885346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010704821,0.0004370046,0.0005601881,0.010386529,0.0003788914,0.003488069,0.0016597433,0.0012779156,0.63767356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016103739,0.00001022571,0.00008107271,0.00035477238,0.0000017500436,0.00001544282,0.000023861352,0.00005419878,0.00008572569,0.0012860411,0.95222586,0.0458451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028822055,0.000008766032,0.00034004694,0.00020260969,0.0000018993906,0.000014787469,0.000028339311,0.000014488777,0.0000496739,0.00065386744,0.9986786,0.000004037968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073543843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006246706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27114654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022620158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031974367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322391109","doi":"10.5040/9781509939107","title":"Vicarious Liability in the Common Law World","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Delict; Common law; Law; Doctrine; Strict liability; Liability; Comparative law; Political science; Private law; Public law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.04340788337571818,"score_gpt":0.3047921515746355,"score_spread":0.26138426819891736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322391109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011270435,0.018633775,0.012245865,0.02429613,0.0006892173,0.000041387142,0.000046950718,0.00006775904,0.93270856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6064342,0.021196952,0.009035777,0.014071417,0.001101755,0.00013800462,0.00015370367,0.00012190124,0.3477463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975157,0.00079570105,0.00007586266,0.0002027315,0.0011635859,0.00024648212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984207,0.0008512878,0.00014590578,0.00019056069,0.00022309655,0.00016853015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016116052,0.00030739148,0.0003432051,0.0011538981,0.0035311985,0.0062675322,0.0008493691,0.0022411752,0.0055651516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037856859,0.00019974876,0.00028824978,0.001393941,0.01709513,0.0069057317,0.0033890312,0.0033722876,0.0011339579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.386569e-7,0.0000025783863,0.000037123755,0.000007724518,5.4347345e-7,0.00003639749,0.0012548437,0.000074191485,0.000019616125,0.99003685,0.0050475113,0.003481944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001866748,0.000009678398,0.00027087016,0.00011844201,0.0000022973875,0.00020727377,0.0020450752,0.0003342888,0.00007495305,0.64614755,0.35077888,0.000008827135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042379173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057619317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062675322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004306005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047247177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03124237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322760559","doi":"10.1111/jols.12407","title":"<i>Lawyers and the Rule of Law</i> By AndrewBoon, Oxford: Hart, 2022, 576 pp., £90.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Flood myth; Law; Library science; Sociology; History; Political science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01624765731057248,"score_gpt":0.28784250873800804,"score_spread":0.27159485142743556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322760559","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039886864,0.72354645,0.00059986557,0.06565025,0.0071322406,0.000020265408,0.00031871913,0.00015377837,0.20217957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020066293,0.2891063,0.00092345005,0.019217014,0.004989018,0.00006433319,0.00040121542,0.00026863115,0.6649637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988625,0.00031146515,0.0000628176,0.00014798454,0.00045653098,0.0001587099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987733,0.00065667013,0.00017237874,0.00006706916,0.00015723445,0.00017323671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010302166,0.0009174734,0.00050251896,0.0012815233,0.002175615,0.0064198305,0.0010657462,0.0036193754,0.11108954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028597915,0.00080792117,0.00027385663,0.0033095793,0.0033963171,0.0074319206,0.001898274,0.0043019895,0.034582365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000875731,0.000007770038,0.000063024854,0.00016510852,0.000001773883,0.000027772423,0.00030933972,0.00004148285,0.000038785816,0.021232443,0.94155,0.036553763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020604941,0.000002622343,0.00020788128,0.00029094645,6.565423e-7,0.0000319432,0.000200792,0.0000139373415,0.000011334577,0.0038602063,0.99537486,0.0000028904894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040275943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095907114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11108954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005344209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043820203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37163156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322770748","doi":"10.1017/lst.2023.1","title":"Security interests and knowing receipt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Property (philosophy); Liability; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Security interest; Law and economics; Business; Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Sociology; Accounting; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07946423820398954,"score_gpt":0.40716223397991647,"score_spread":0.32769799577592695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322770748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22318618,0.003135113,0.07078217,0.04478405,0.00022016608,0.00016753154,0.00012966024,0.00006375892,0.6575313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331397,0.00038126518,0.001102794,0.0007821666,0.000060536648,0.000024781222,0.000011287424,0.0000052589107,0.004317965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900497,0.0049131424,0.0008465714,0.0010112798,0.0020136628,0.0011655971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96935946,0.018846493,0.004198371,0.003757315,0.0028377664,0.0010006295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011680766,0.00024500248,0.0005555493,0.0018008334,0.0048746103,0.0074195885,0.0012973696,0.006364982,0.0065975175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02347457,0.00039476223,0.00066743727,0.0013896815,0.040557593,0.010737169,0.007262341,0.00599942,0.00057893066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057674397,0.000010392079,0.0005158909,0.000017580616,0.0000039863717,0.0001834437,0.002166231,0.00013962357,0.00008038625,0.9951421,0.00028794204,0.0014466917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000150118385,0.000044715503,0.0013441226,0.00029728303,0.000024304258,0.00052029564,0.004145115,0.0007066976,0.00054100837,0.97193325,0.020405175,0.000023055862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054486883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029781742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011680766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005488423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005564326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061774552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323025880","doi":"10.21638/spbu25.2023.104","title":"The doctrine of error in the law of Louisiana and Quebec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pravovedenie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Legal doctrine; Political science; State (computer science); Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Causality (physics); Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.054849404230054764,"score_gpt":0.3708404663097672,"score_spread":0.31599106207971245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323025880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39727324,0.008557941,0.0073648677,0.03230559,0.00025581778,0.00012339714,0.00046063843,0.00007961233,0.5535789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825037,0.00041634857,0.0010465824,0.00079401146,0.000015563917,0.0000207057,0.00003885634,0.00000849522,0.01515576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932295,0.0018804239,0.00023461973,0.00062351546,0.0026686022,0.0013632732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909225,0.0032483314,0.00075814914,0.00038651744,0.0041982667,0.00048624055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038681857,0.0002226315,0.000334241,0.002300004,0.013499254,0.0094969915,0.0015706964,0.0017832188,0.0030119652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013959385,0.0001726119,0.00024975656,0.0036897473,0.018247455,0.0020295389,0.003138538,0.0022859047,0.00013308735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025550538,0.000013664732,0.0060036043,0.000032013435,0.000016347713,0.00026051037,0.010841455,0.0009894202,0.00022669954,0.96222717,0.0036952319,0.01566836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008640357,0.00014374859,0.11238139,0.0009778084,0.00014765769,0.000653581,0.065079644,0.011711085,0.0015736602,0.28392017,0.5229838,0.00034106267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96876615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9707239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96876615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09129976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09213258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6624292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323025925","doi":"10.21638/spbu25.2023.102","title":"Trusts in mixed jurisdictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pravovedenie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; English law; Trust law; Legislation; Convention; Norm (philosophy); Arbitration; Common law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.0462034789168687,"score_gpt":0.3730527508201265,"score_spread":0.3268492719032578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323025925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48996755,0.0019088881,0.041129157,0.019163387,0.000407006,0.0001573135,0.00020997488,0.00013916218,0.4469176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787845,0.00015766894,0.0013448554,0.0007335679,0.000041636707,0.000036930465,0.000034103603,0.00001850199,0.018848276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903043,0.0034723284,0.00052486773,0.0014654532,0.0014405288,0.0027926047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911112,0.0018068436,0.0012882325,0.0012112794,0.001706512,0.0028758736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053423867,0.00020663928,0.00045958048,0.001093082,0.009124757,0.0130727235,0.0010760075,0.0023145326,0.016471837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014737252,0.00046307564,0.0006452934,0.0014380238,0.012007407,0.011510027,0.011995996,0.003357947,0.001594464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001940441,0.00000957144,0.0019670692,0.000017091472,0.000018017587,0.00054757163,0.007486063,0.00024850512,0.00007811823,0.9827627,0.0025238213,0.004322059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006724826,0.00009319274,0.004039227,0.00023744731,0.00008219933,0.001592981,0.030104276,0.004660848,0.00034007666,0.7744216,0.18427294,0.000088073044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018465111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016959827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018465111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066021103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053130467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05510378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323306658","doi":"10.32920/22223320","title":"Aboriginal Title in Tsilhqot’in: Exploring the Public Power of Private Property at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Law; Political science; High Court; Power (physics); Private property; Property rights","score_opus":0.0885969842385872,"score_gpt":0.3223243740019781,"score_spread":0.2337273897633909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323306658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12376633,0.0070182807,0.0021753588,0.10639345,0.00064075115,0.00020281582,0.00068732933,0.00006118742,0.7590545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86685395,0.0019358335,0.00088929903,0.026688451,0.00028747553,0.000131248,0.00013813788,0.00006168348,0.10301392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196565,0.0008305387,0.00015855281,0.00080750306,0.0025802236,0.0036574474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940705,0.002481931,0.00018536713,0.0002372646,0.0021784161,0.0008465551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051041823,0.00043851728,0.0007119909,0.0013016546,0.04020989,0.019394403,0.0036189056,0.01293496,0.0056216647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010094378,0.00074817665,0.0006180736,0.0022538623,0.019699177,0.0033449617,0.0036073064,0.012848643,0.00037757834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001803969,0.000011842141,0.0010849935,0.000032694894,0.00001238415,0.0004960844,0.011113099,0.00024998415,0.00018482721,0.9629748,0.021236356,0.0025850104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013620606,0.000058210655,0.015490183,0.0010542709,0.0002525577,0.00034826444,0.041414224,0.0036720233,0.0015355601,0.24914822,0.68650967,0.00038057397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98912674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13080229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13080229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18789709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9490415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323306752","doi":"10.32920/22223320.v1","title":"Aboriginal Title in Tsilhqot’in: Exploring the Public Power of Private Property at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Law; Political science; High Court; Power (physics); Property rights; Private property; Indigenous rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.0885969842385872,"score_gpt":0.3223243740019781,"score_spread":0.2337273897633909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323306752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12376633,0.0070182807,0.0021753588,0.10639345,0.00064075115,0.00020281582,0.00068732933,0.00006118742,0.7590545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86685395,0.0019358335,0.00088929903,0.026688451,0.00028747553,0.000131248,0.00013813788,0.00006168348,0.10301392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196565,0.0008305387,0.00015855281,0.00080750306,0.0025802236,0.0036574474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940705,0.002481931,0.00018536713,0.0002372646,0.0021784161,0.0008465551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051041823,0.00043851728,0.0007119909,0.0013016546,0.04020989,0.019394403,0.0036189056,0.01293496,0.0056216647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010094378,0.00074817665,0.0006180736,0.0022538623,0.019699177,0.0033449617,0.0036073064,0.012848643,0.00037757834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001803969,0.000011842141,0.0010849935,0.000032694894,0.00001238415,0.0004960844,0.011113099,0.00024998415,0.00018482721,0.9629748,0.021236356,0.0025850104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013620606,0.000058210655,0.015490183,0.0010542709,0.0002525577,0.00034826444,0.041414224,0.0036720233,0.0015355601,0.24914822,0.68650967,0.00038057397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98912674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13080229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13080229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18789709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9490415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323340247","doi":"10.7202/1096892ar","title":"Guillaume Tusseau, Droit comparé et théorie générale du droit. Notes sur quelques allers-retours aporétiques, Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval, 2021, 104 p., ISBN : 978-2-7637-5541-0.","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013128318328246317,"score_gpt":0.24827287534273546,"score_spread":0.23514455701448914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323340247","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043047924,0.8557866,0.0013242784,0.07051145,0.0050359424,0.000027868156,0.0005639385,0.00009087083,0.06622859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024315393,0.59452236,0.0022481105,0.017577859,0.003494356,0.00013614487,0.0006969237,0.00044533264,0.35656357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799806,0.0004810533,0.000097352466,0.00032929674,0.0009036341,0.00019071052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757916,0.0010956444,0.000134905,0.00008274567,0.0009340119,0.00017356042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016416297,0.0018513553,0.0012560999,0.0037446576,0.0049200775,0.0054922113,0.0023185352,0.00606079,0.06449886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003475313,0.0010458261,0.0007258837,0.0071301023,0.0045972033,0.010663386,0.0017807405,0.004734295,0.016975751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003125157,0.0000125482065,0.00023495252,0.00046160293,0.000014578472,0.00009112363,0.0019293963,0.00011511572,0.00008073829,0.043641187,0.9136093,0.039778292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012633445,0.0000059157305,0.0013368072,0.00066501595,0.000008467075,0.00009621505,0.001120769,0.00008090091,0.00009364,0.00922346,0.98732996,0.000026220481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6457403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73160285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6457403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02659328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0125227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.712692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323351803","doi":"10.32920/22227955","title":"Ought from is: Towards Truly Reasonable Expectations of Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Tort; Law; Political science; Right to privacy; Information privacy; Normative; Privacy laws of the United States; Expectation of privacy; Privacy policy; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.10755283223475445,"score_gpt":0.3853090370057704,"score_spread":0.2777562047710159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323351803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021881197,0.0024913487,0.19729836,0.21159035,0.000887639,0.00016905396,0.0001539499,0.00027059973,0.5652575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9050406,0.001524856,0.047983326,0.01873898,0.00056845695,0.00037278506,0.0002293637,0.00025622777,0.0252854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97071296,0.01737109,0.001076305,0.0026027823,0.0063208514,0.0019160252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97988784,0.010414141,0.0012814384,0.0028577738,0.0038635833,0.0016952793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025441986,0.00081858697,0.0009655843,0.0014464416,0.0072803535,0.01845096,0.0026464008,0.008606441,0.004823535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03566395,0.0008921479,0.0013310353,0.0010576481,0.04078863,0.025073795,0.009946003,0.014467392,0.0012941048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033399263,0.0000047408753,0.00007395339,0.000009538921,0.0000017481003,0.000021813932,0.0021200536,0.0001347292,0.00003494744,0.99519944,0.0012354116,0.0011602122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050545063,0.000006182678,0.000078823956,0.000046646765,0.0000027452897,0.00003122099,0.0015758366,0.0005035188,0.00009905795,0.96992326,0.027718993,0.000008790559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008996378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006276133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025441986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012006151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012701469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1345517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352385","doi":"10.32920/22227955.v1","title":"Ought from is: Towards Truly Reasonable Expectations of Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Tort; Law; Political science; Information privacy; Right to privacy; Normative; Privacy laws of the United States; Expectation of privacy; Privacy policy; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.10755283223475445,"score_gpt":0.3853090370057704,"score_spread":0.2777562047710159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021881197,0.0024913487,0.19729836,0.21159035,0.000887639,0.00016905396,0.0001539499,0.00027059973,0.5652575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9050406,0.001524856,0.047983326,0.01873898,0.00056845695,0.00037278506,0.0002293637,0.00025622777,0.0252854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97071296,0.01737109,0.001076305,0.0026027823,0.0063208514,0.0019160252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97988784,0.010414141,0.0012814384,0.0028577738,0.0038635833,0.0016952793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025441986,0.00081858697,0.0009655843,0.0014464416,0.0072803535,0.01845096,0.0026464008,0.008606441,0.004823535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03566395,0.0008921479,0.0013310353,0.0010576481,0.04078863,0.025073795,0.009946003,0.014467392,0.0012941048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033399263,0.0000047408753,0.00007395339,0.000009538921,0.0000017481003,0.000021813932,0.0021200536,0.0001347292,0.00003494744,0.99519944,0.0012354116,0.0011602122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050545063,0.000006182678,0.000078823956,0.000046646765,0.0000027452897,0.00003122099,0.0015758366,0.0005035188,0.00009905795,0.96992326,0.027718993,0.000008790559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008996378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006276133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025441986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012006151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012701469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1345517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323355929","doi":"10.32920/22227448.v1","title":"Deconstructing Directness: A Critical Evaluation of the Role of Directness in the Canadian Tort of Battery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Battery (electricity); Economic Justice; Element (criminal law); Cause of action; Law and economics; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.11100872032632854,"score_gpt":0.40803081893197174,"score_spread":0.2970220986056432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323355929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108196914,0.018173842,0.01682326,0.21107739,0.0010258248,0.00044436243,0.00021034703,0.00005047775,0.64399755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96367955,0.005528235,0.003676824,0.013754365,0.00018470318,0.00010310177,0.000034095596,0.00003520133,0.013003955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828896,0.0052394127,0.0003388269,0.0011786493,0.0074566132,0.0028968458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748511,0.016252799,0.00081892806,0.0006570922,0.0066674105,0.00075270137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019172335,0.0011073923,0.00079061225,0.0053739087,0.034007885,0.01458353,0.0048117363,0.0072563305,0.004511615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034294404,0.00052999955,0.0008088617,0.0052349223,0.10479307,0.010149378,0.007528278,0.011396555,0.0002094461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011365995,0.000006945773,0.00042526965,0.00007141732,0.000005894835,0.000096752396,0.016120302,0.00021561682,0.0000732348,0.9748745,0.002961448,0.005137185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059219503,0.000046741698,0.006336489,0.0013085196,0.000152667,0.00020086156,0.1206634,0.0021412384,0.00081456377,0.6675281,0.2005939,0.00015430756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.936947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15870827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15870827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16511188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356334","doi":"10.32920/22227448","title":"Deconstructing Directness: A Critical Evaluation of the Role of Directness in the Canadian Tort of Battery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Battery (electricity); Economic Justice; Cause of action; Action (physics); Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.11100872032632854,"score_gpt":0.40803081893197174,"score_spread":0.2970220986056432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323356334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108196914,0.018173842,0.01682326,0.21107739,0.0010258248,0.00044436243,0.00021034703,0.00005047775,0.64399755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96367955,0.005528235,0.003676824,0.013754365,0.00018470318,0.00010310177,0.000034095596,0.00003520133,0.013003955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828896,0.0052394127,0.0003388269,0.0011786493,0.0074566132,0.0028968458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748511,0.016252799,0.00081892806,0.0006570922,0.0066674105,0.00075270137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019172335,0.0011073923,0.00079061225,0.0053739087,0.034007885,0.01458353,0.0048117363,0.0072563305,0.004511615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034294404,0.00052999955,0.0008088617,0.0052349223,0.10479307,0.010149378,0.007528278,0.011396555,0.0002094461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011365995,0.000006945773,0.00042526965,0.00007141732,0.000005894835,0.000096752396,0.016120302,0.00021561682,0.0000732348,0.9748745,0.002961448,0.005137185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059219503,0.000046741698,0.006336489,0.0013085196,0.000152667,0.00020086156,0.1206634,0.0021412384,0.00081456377,0.6675281,0.2005939,0.00015430756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.936947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15870827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15870827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16511188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4328030726","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552191.002.0004","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TypeScript; Law; Section (typography); Argument (complex analysis); Jurisprudence; Art history; Library science; Sociology; Classics; History; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.056408614638353526,"score_gpt":0.30761552589141555,"score_spread":0.25120691125306205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4328030726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005528116,0.004381204,0.0023324185,0.0056323814,0.0149021605,0.00016141137,0.0038898936,0.0006186108,0.9675291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030729386,0.0024618723,0.00130201,0.001483883,0.00271984,0.000098057484,0.0037518884,0.0004957275,0.9846139],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995528,0.00005709685,0.000025267562,0.00007138128,0.00026022928,0.00003319683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872965,0.00026005963,0.000056562425,0.00012545548,0.00070623413,0.00012199984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004695775,0.0007119336,0.0005388108,0.0021523447,0.002016928,0.003419685,0.0010565686,0.0009268969,0.47394443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030741508,0.00033328513,0.00037354272,0.0020641163,0.000624957,0.0026496877,0.0014356046,0.002651208,0.2702741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112097105,0.000014564472,0.000043454365,0.00008764188,9.4651557e-7,0.000037746,0.00014097622,0.000053588512,0.00008338104,0.011868117,0.95237505,0.03528318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010073248,0.0000034687228,0.000083737454,0.00007189777,4.4086616e-7,0.000036002424,0.0000529047,0.000015518037,0.000027776458,0.0016718735,0.99803346,0.0000017700678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029803442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048503396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47394443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017791316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013173957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43373775","doi":"","title":"Government contracts and the fettering of discretion - a question of validity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SA Publiekreg = SA Public Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Commit; Obligation; Public interest; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Private rights; Freedom of contract; Flexibility (engineering); Law; Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03038227050639788,"score_gpt":0.28817381392689484,"score_spread":0.257791543420497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43373775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03471513,0.013447879,0.08758574,0.23821533,0.0014746143,0.00018439097,0.00034378338,0.000113541704,0.62391967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221753,0.005263157,0.018251427,0.015336341,0.002387792,0.0005101341,0.00018726685,0.00030180518,0.035586834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9274176,0.03724784,0.003716637,0.008191465,0.017527789,0.0058986903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8909486,0.07693927,0.005158967,0.015074417,0.009507289,0.0023713997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048771277,0.0006335757,0.0025750913,0.002919065,0.012541589,0.021725018,0.0065325587,0.018296735,0.0063304603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099267446,0.0012527037,0.0023437801,0.004621064,0.11551624,0.038359106,0.011785687,0.020872777,0.0014202576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032686926,0.0000023261807,0.000039125247,0.000006674908,0.0000017185092,0.000010234619,0.00035529406,0.000056508357,0.000004456169,0.99860317,0.00032781297,0.000589357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011320049,0.0000032149048,0.00004293409,0.0000667812,0.0000019524412,0.000017472677,0.00021376973,0.0001738592,0.000018770974,0.99119747,0.00824616,0.0000062784407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020030588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073437444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048771277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014669636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02472435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25793022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360779098","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-25218-1_3","title":"Property Meeting the Challenge of the Commons in Common Law Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Statutory law; Political science; Common law; Law; Politics; Property law; House of Commons; Property rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06806328203593921,"score_gpt":0.2926965094875807,"score_spread":0.2246332274516415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360779098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010054326,0.007383146,0.00556,0.109228,0.0010692443,0.000073031755,0.0002317892,0.000087137654,0.8663132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44049326,0.0049854536,0.0039855964,0.026834687,0.00083161163,0.00011173564,0.00013332041,0.0001788668,0.52244544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994547,0.00091119815,0.00009337059,0.00057749625,0.0022169997,0.0016538815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720323,0.0010913321,0.00007874822,0.00019242793,0.000916301,0.0005180252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00402471,0.00045511825,0.00083070976,0.0018881704,0.019490073,0.017087502,0.0026905648,0.01054107,0.016766362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00899949,0.00047234312,0.0005978987,0.0036331653,0.019744026,0.007957717,0.005016766,0.01051725,0.0012869684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033455942,0.000006835095,0.000087255736,0.000010878353,0.0000025382105,0.00002593623,0.0007175624,0.00015810766,0.000019616886,0.9630215,0.031236883,0.0047094696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127891635,0.00001052585,0.0007831478,0.00016568009,0.00001557958,0.00003878325,0.00371664,0.0010285667,0.00017205426,0.53097254,0.46304494,0.000038731654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.942143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.967287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072603434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072603434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15967824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52677727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362229","doi":"10.1139/o74-018","title":"References to the Holocaust in English Law Reports","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Biochemistry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Holocaust; German; History; Law; Classics; Art history; Religious studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018772082072001574,"score_gpt":0.27064557405684575,"score_spread":0.25187349198484416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0110536525,0.035923332,0.0019119098,0.07797133,0.009783071,0.00006060926,0.0009863351,0.00030894496,0.86200094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3772894,0.03502728,0.001712397,0.04481065,0.013103067,0.00013951154,0.001120941,0.0007696169,0.5260271],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497765,0.0017414469,0.00048730004,0.0003769325,0.0015895306,0.0008271592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780588,0.013227317,0.0023216757,0.0020452247,0.0037178614,0.00062905287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036547955,0.00039188986,0.00025885846,0.00605503,0.005060846,0.007502382,0.0015822485,0.0031132943,0.024657588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020287752,0.00047542088,0.00024450448,0.006065175,0.008059387,0.005181728,0.0034728784,0.0035270518,0.005195065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015600772,0.000017139178,0.00070891436,0.0002680671,0.0000035697394,0.0005751987,0.023591368,0.00003665659,0.00012391697,0.40110165,0.5515269,0.022031112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016013672,0.0000026187427,0.0008489686,0.0002969089,0.0000015868277,0.00012523055,0.0021706645,0.000020819356,0.0000659145,0.0021529896,0.9943052,0.0000075837647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0373264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043085735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0373264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006187449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037878158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08248782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393008","doi":"10.7202/1098444ar","title":"The Limits of the Declaratory Judgment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statute; Summary judgment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04791834975192315,"score_gpt":0.3076115822506873,"score_spread":0.25969323249876414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019237151,0.03591197,0.035814643,0.16166118,0.0013403939,0.00011080324,0.00013657057,0.00013922248,0.745648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8703872,0.015369685,0.015580741,0.04542588,0.002214382,0.000299024,0.00008387882,0.00019712493,0.050442055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9532756,0.014998281,0.0027952788,0.0073144697,0.017779967,0.0038363345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946309,0.04098648,0.0016050416,0.0037349863,0.005729984,0.0016344459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040898927,0.0005839162,0.0013597407,0.0023848973,0.012663631,0.02043021,0.004432309,0.01039909,0.005215191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060753535,0.0008920876,0.0010404314,0.0018904347,0.08585132,0.014618314,0.00817878,0.018898506,0.00095374166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004726052,0.000002718697,0.00008701486,0.000019451854,0.0000028036739,0.000036655645,0.0018397232,0.000051815547,0.000040449657,0.99165267,0.002002384,0.0042596725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002026661,0.000023174702,0.00059550384,0.0006647679,0.000020620697,0.00017656742,0.0029383095,0.00045506257,0.000240309,0.74823856,0.24656092,0.00006588342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1691004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13439575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1691004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031026168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03192869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33623224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366384703","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.0025.016","title":"Incomplete Successes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.33232416739307524,"score_gpt":0.43096074881282304,"score_spread":0.09863658141974779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366384703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19815676,0.0015180436,0.066068076,0.006236182,0.00053273,0.0011108331,0.016191904,0.0009780292,0.70920753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8459242,0.00091058615,0.017343063,0.0008396708,0.00022243768,0.0013211432,0.008264878,0.00046928087,0.12470476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97476,0.0059998604,0.0018274402,0.0029444029,0.01147332,0.0029950289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91017455,0.036491565,0.007777606,0.020371959,0.022006486,0.0031779222],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01603734,0.0009670804,0.001959288,0.005595324,0.003147231,0.0047308784,0.0021812753,0.001433905,0.046318296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09961239,0.0005595237,0.0010813407,0.0047559086,0.004081188,0.0082680825,0.0063122166,0.002990272,0.006561762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004475658,0.0002644532,0.038006887,0.0009578869,0.00020909918,0.00039733082,0.007442806,0.0032743192,0.00058619044,0.65336776,0.05016799,0.2448778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081083715,0.00034177228,0.04888079,0.001263419,0.00033151556,0.00090773735,0.0094131995,0.008249747,0.003154729,0.5458057,0.3814515,0.000118856515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008263079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01156894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98396266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035707313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005576407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15495014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367046972","doi":"10.1017/9781009246361.005","title":"Examining Vicarious Liability Comparatively","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Doctrine; Joint and several liability; Supreme court; Liability; Strict liability; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10907510826574691,"score_gpt":0.27791649607771834,"score_spread":0.16884138781197144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367046972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013577325,0.042328995,0.012657438,0.020678747,0.0007512928,0.000027436341,0.000028218692,0.00002952782,0.909921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6658292,0.056613937,0.0069048405,0.011734703,0.0013304395,0.00012641845,0.00011092331,0.00011825417,0.25723132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900824,0.0004195933,0.000023975048,0.000101210935,0.00035203973,0.00009497683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990947,0.0006385086,0.0000522426,0.00004946509,0.0001117525,0.00005327203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014784237,0.00041169484,0.00027806437,0.0015776032,0.003120609,0.0037913043,0.0007453685,0.0022600149,0.00703261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016988348,0.00017113776,0.00025464685,0.0013766579,0.013572985,0.006043479,0.0028920784,0.003530546,0.0010389952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.965998e-7,0.0000049594664,0.000040829418,0.000016474063,5.0490496e-7,0.00003868318,0.003182664,0.00008950701,0.00003106402,0.9899176,0.0026587222,0.004018278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016067589,0.0000128800675,0.0002769214,0.0003336696,0.0000021478922,0.00018326695,0.0037623579,0.00040763838,0.00013016946,0.5861253,0.40875763,0.0000064039023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040393933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005595449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00703261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005904782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027673577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04284239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367843815","doi":"10.1017/s0022109023000613","title":"Public Disclosure and Consumer Financial Protection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Public access; Content (measure theory); Finance; Internet privacy; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.09284960279841117,"score_gpt":0.3435394255135999,"score_spread":0.2506898227151887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367843815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91269517,0.004204109,0.002212905,0.012831336,0.00009452949,0.000066088265,0.0009142313,0.00007277458,0.06690867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823666,0.00023673603,0.00014410345,0.00031426142,0.00006564293,0.000007541824,0.00007376373,0.0000032164944,0.00091797736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943533,0.002468008,0.00032642347,0.00044324424,0.0019002699,0.0005087333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8760695,0.053479858,0.057988133,0.0059862905,0.004905463,0.00157086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061980337,0.00012109985,0.0003096584,0.0013006824,0.00052050164,0.0018354635,0.00032454878,0.0009998088,0.009405327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05128453,0.0001265478,0.00029539445,0.0017789707,0.0014485981,0.0011022515,0.0008970927,0.0010395319,0.00034805384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054171326,0.00075787713,0.7399847,0.00036969563,0.0002575072,0.00038256767,0.005808831,0.0015711712,0.0007216822,0.05918364,0.01543288,0.17498772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009115721,0.00033396084,0.9223212,0.0003375298,0.00013462658,0.0006012869,0.002938197,0.0028321284,0.0011890662,0.04321107,0.025966473,0.000043386994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027130367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019186557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009405327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012705697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012727125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03277874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058606","doi":"10.7202/1098593ar","title":"Actions collectives et tribunaux administratifs : un vide juridictionnel à combler","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07040641311657626,"score_gpt":0.34513133532927864,"score_spread":0.2747249222127024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058606","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058795526,0.12254859,0.014477557,0.42362994,0.010853677,0.00024767133,0.0005024427,0.00015160297,0.421709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.294808,0.08324594,0.02741315,0.079687476,0.018584663,0.0010894533,0.00055849843,0.00024544736,0.4943674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848,0.0052810907,0.0007264766,0.0012240345,0.006328117,0.0016404208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99108934,0.004117723,0.00082404463,0.00084270217,0.002152171,0.0009740117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014265758,0.00084310054,0.00118641,0.0019903167,0.011020829,0.017564554,0.002318166,0.012751951,0.015558641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01744899,0.0011910979,0.00069540576,0.0030554992,0.01783968,0.016221877,0.009088889,0.012038655,0.002609439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019290424,0.0000142265535,0.00020932179,0.00015099044,0.0000046253767,0.00006143401,0.0034393806,0.00011087605,0.000162937,0.84993315,0.123730056,0.022163767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018729364,0.000026592186,0.0013615654,0.00063977315,0.00001207454,0.000079890575,0.0022934813,0.00018169115,0.0001934858,0.08447244,0.91067016,0.000050180297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089339115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14100364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089339115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014541543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031765703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17763817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239638","doi":"10.1515/9780773569195-010","title":"Adult Guardianship Leigislation in British Columbia: Reform and Restructuring through CommunityParticipation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Restructuring; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.032919119475191536,"score_gpt":0.25255847060674097,"score_spread":0.21963935113154942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6465563,0.0027086777,0.0015070153,0.03988043,0.00023703004,0.00026005236,0.00039414276,0.00009443813,0.30836186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7565766,0.00065048685,0.0007984534,0.0040748203,0.000033433185,0.00010691234,0.00012548169,0.00002672215,0.23760709],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967253,0.0005355657,0.00006734257,0.00025873948,0.0004652805,0.001947688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957624,0.0007080206,0.00020600742,0.00018626009,0.00090338883,0.0022340226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022704613,0.00017125986,0.00019774854,0.0008248306,0.0114514185,0.0029446392,0.0027894487,0.002668831,0.018205343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065908893,0.0003676835,0.00016323433,0.0015173575,0.0033971723,0.0011231048,0.0040394375,0.0036562087,0.0011429247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020562952,0.0005105193,0.0767367,0.0001795862,0.0000178618,0.0024100959,0.18413055,0.000780918,0.001626109,0.23611613,0.12687042,0.37041554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097654294,0.00021041531,0.18714067,0.0005461757,0.00003960542,0.0005603893,0.1534403,0.001310771,0.0011488434,0.009408184,0.64602524,0.00007173742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9175621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97456294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08243787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02946296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09487466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21376973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377240802","doi":"10.1515/9780228009115","title":"Royally Wronged","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.02105668725874571,"score_gpt":0.24332809128448976,"score_spread":0.22227140402574405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377240802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004648609,0.015055028,0.0021910288,0.1847299,0.041883346,0.00007217233,0.00057185494,0.0005791365,0.75026906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07314541,0.005454219,0.0010779479,0.059977762,0.0040431973,0.000029187144,0.00022039525,0.0005696517,0.8554823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98394173,0.0017757957,0.0005831971,0.0024647969,0.008120078,0.0031143369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98383003,0.0019782095,0.0006907379,0.0024991354,0.00854749,0.0024543554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060861954,0.0009752185,0.0009674988,0.0014635065,0.016568577,0.01642217,0.0024195702,0.008435657,0.06329378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028537923,0.0005869816,0.0007091981,0.0011396122,0.018504797,0.0061511905,0.00565792,0.010280506,0.026151983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026875075,0.000011176103,0.0003713765,0.00008058944,0.000014365832,0.00026018312,0.001943914,0.00006291431,0.00020044186,0.19246769,0.7785556,0.026004948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023485052,0.0000046775804,0.0001831498,0.000083242485,0.000004070849,0.00016209314,0.00046656275,0.000027074717,0.00010725183,0.0060105994,0.9929321,0.000016884533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3383634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40349337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3383634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025826653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05356915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6727878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377252422","doi":"10.1515/9780773552319","title":"Common Sense and Legal Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Sense (electronics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.024747966256863298,"score_gpt":0.2594939537725436,"score_spread":0.2347459875156803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377252422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045446,0.027630914,0.015608533,0.07616201,0.0026521261,0.00009371789,0.000056267236,0.00008219896,0.87316966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7097199,0.015927088,0.013099386,0.03054134,0.003394476,0.00038127936,0.00012721207,0.00021891407,0.22659054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812393,0.0092130555,0.00091169635,0.001925198,0.004977831,0.0017329631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98995286,0.0067914343,0.00052700314,0.0008497822,0.0013510695,0.0005277791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011361543,0.00079002517,0.00086908374,0.0029095048,0.013666326,0.017761555,0.0018489468,0.007569607,0.004393181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02325341,0.00046668632,0.000824272,0.002899275,0.08056064,0.016489722,0.0073381914,0.009320794,0.0013073699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011364983,0.0000022102286,0.000018478822,0.000015208268,9.007125e-7,0.000016510829,0.0022295585,0.00003386778,0.000011167844,0.98958766,0.0056013367,0.0024819172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042338384,0.000005480536,0.00008685289,0.00018753462,0.0000027711933,0.00004463246,0.0025213182,0.00014482571,0.000056207133,0.8633009,0.13363524,0.000009941446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018996088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019825468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018996088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01776608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016561802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12890255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377964707","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_233","title":"Great Enrichment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06713823327403196,"score_gpt":0.3252193116646869,"score_spread":0.25808107839065497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377964707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002440566,0.0012616586,0.0012605586,0.0036650796,0.0010315751,0.000016780623,0.000055426062,0.000098132055,0.99236673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002344794,0.0005050808,0.0004998641,0.0015313509,0.00025419024,0.000013936215,0.000037875983,0.0000764345,0.9947364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994041,0.00012731836,0.000011930828,0.00008552129,0.00029000346,0.00008124058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995235,0.00009926079,0.000013869736,0.000103164704,0.00016563143,0.00009456404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006933834,0.0005634581,0.00043443666,0.0013947709,0.0031288513,0.0049909195,0.0009472855,0.0020818065,0.18035537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019014729,0.00031551148,0.0003968025,0.0008108566,0.0028198077,0.004250549,0.0037161594,0.0033731274,0.084908284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009708472,0.000022057167,0.00006518952,0.00004708554,0.0000021965297,0.000033273453,0.0005130084,0.000052996125,0.00012601286,0.28852445,0.6417133,0.06889075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011872404,0.0000020001187,0.000052911717,0.000032539974,7.348537e-7,0.000030516541,0.00010116814,0.000026092473,0.00004199672,0.020663746,0.9790454,0.0000017987091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038070758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014111438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18035537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020937189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019748819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60334885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378445419","doi":"10.1515/9780773587946","title":"The Guardianship of Best Interests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.033699502995405695,"score_gpt":0.26568566389934345,"score_spread":0.23198616090393775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378445419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028056461,0.008485764,0.015280567,0.1241657,0.0006419266,0.000055164754,0.00006832191,0.00007360041,0.82317245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93067247,0.002986865,0.0039528115,0.010532049,0.00025066998,0.00011019801,0.000027296479,0.000054025022,0.051413596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811967,0.012919633,0.00049313717,0.0016988345,0.0019990425,0.0016925342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98816305,0.0076398244,0.0008428673,0.0012868036,0.0011912821,0.000876221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015076458,0.00044378373,0.00062215637,0.0015057621,0.010060182,0.013914615,0.0015994376,0.004877646,0.0047492054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015595348,0.00049472775,0.00034849576,0.0012522986,0.07660856,0.008463595,0.008794629,0.006974643,0.00089407543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029853227,0.0000032952682,0.0001796976,0.000009937618,0.0000012298154,0.000047926234,0.008143708,0.000031650856,0.000024930143,0.98531276,0.0023891455,0.0038527518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015123757,0.000018276427,0.0005382946,0.00036035595,0.000010454203,0.0001984759,0.018683063,0.0002923607,0.00028392128,0.70729846,0.2722797,0.000021515209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026839998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021273363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026839998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011719214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014087244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085029244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379141157","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2023.2214484","title":"Humility as a necessary virtue in common-law decision making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Virtue; Law; Morality; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial opinion; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.031222652284411245,"score_gpt":0.4053084581974671,"score_spread":0.37408580591305585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379141157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08153387,0.004767123,0.24592878,0.072632246,0.00087135105,0.00033651423,0.00011992526,0.0002903688,0.5935198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628588,0.0006143503,0.02760447,0.00314501,0.00034485766,0.0001523075,0.000028967164,0.0000387602,0.005212519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97896135,0.012595778,0.0009902132,0.0018853394,0.0037329616,0.001834462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694387,0.01786719,0.0028905885,0.0044324826,0.0032634863,0.0021076761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020619454,0.000412745,0.0010146502,0.0018869134,0.0050414633,0.007828912,0.0012409608,0.004664788,0.0030984299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024849424,0.0005272972,0.0008191234,0.0008669256,0.06429193,0.0073217903,0.00748893,0.005885023,0.0006767107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063252814,0.000009709596,0.00019509744,0.000026781356,0.0000056230165,0.000048592454,0.0007600127,0.00019752768,0.000092636066,0.99583435,0.00053522526,0.0022881075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009901028,0.00001662103,0.0003061815,0.000045995097,0.0000036026765,0.0000618767,0.00024644547,0.00033914126,0.00014938554,0.9923798,0.0064303805,0.000010813932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015889518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020892862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020619454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029141505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007314741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10904741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380090767","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jlad007","title":"The Elusive Third Way? The Role of Positive Morality in <i>Recognizing Wrongs</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0414097305603416,"score_gpt":0.3832651918561435,"score_spread":0.3418554612958019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380090767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0142102055,0.07488243,0.0101227015,0.58237165,0.00380457,0.00004384758,0.00005504536,0.00005617007,0.3144534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8475521,0.044366367,0.0057921796,0.07270766,0.0037840868,0.00010530848,0.000039076556,0.00011274669,0.025540365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820311,0.01110065,0.00050045544,0.00092163094,0.0041871406,0.0012590103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757515,0.014671781,0.002553838,0.0013669209,0.004273066,0.0013827935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01808173,0.00025364707,0.00065861957,0.0023622136,0.004614811,0.013835214,0.0014052492,0.0062483316,0.0036349902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03839245,0.00025858564,0.00057639554,0.0013356876,0.0466267,0.009032709,0.004636548,0.008784459,0.00093380164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008853357,0.000018141498,0.00059722364,0.00016170483,0.0000162633,0.00007185277,0.0033925173,0.00008584435,0.000067194545,0.950904,0.021376584,0.023299808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019500294,0.00002724988,0.0025883215,0.0020908886,0.000030992094,0.00025887592,0.0062640663,0.0002908503,0.00028048453,0.7878852,0.2002278,0.000035872446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01299495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014205975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01808173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072058816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01648114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095626414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381300344","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4433135","title":"The Irreducible Cores of Trustee Obligations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02187261897554969,"score_gpt":0.3289865310454176,"score_spread":0.3071139120698679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381300344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18766157,0.0007361964,0.18455352,0.011922971,0.00027933595,0.00016896706,0.00036047134,0.00017327201,0.6141437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97856724,0.00023942918,0.007354163,0.00044490056,0.00020846115,0.00015142183,0.00007224672,0.000048426413,0.012913778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993028,0.002826938,0.0003638202,0.00095116126,0.0016206993,0.0012094475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979867,0.01156389,0.0017803343,0.0032418047,0.002226519,0.0013205011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059714895,0.00045036344,0.0012172253,0.002002833,0.0040770015,0.00730939,0.0015347807,0.0032646921,0.010830958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030408915,0.0008695016,0.0009855363,0.0018542875,0.01755025,0.01577178,0.005182785,0.0057776766,0.0009339076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044141034,0.0000043287682,0.00005012476,0.0000040077343,0.0000014083157,0.000010862263,0.00019275957,0.00005554913,0.000013277864,0.99888283,0.00022206962,0.00055848237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005851778,0.0000026930725,0.0000833061,0.000005369172,0.0000020609193,0.000015637592,0.00008909798,0.0003756843,0.00002152935,0.998528,0.00086835795,0.000002321186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024486226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018807864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010830958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024099252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031326222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036233187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382290578","doi":"10.1515/9780228012450","title":"Regulatory Failure and Renewal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0150118055249656,"score_gpt":0.2267469148827328,"score_spread":0.2117351093577672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382290578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014019666,0.011601798,0.009938067,0.031483456,0.00047005812,0.00007192891,0.00006996192,0.00015731363,0.9321877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6193844,0.006759968,0.0023191553,0.011344799,0.00075465627,0.00017015656,0.000115574934,0.00016448408,0.35898677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910876,0.0020665817,0.0002349532,0.0012888396,0.0033684666,0.0019534586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921028,0.0034033158,0.00057041715,0.0015372589,0.0019449886,0.00044126195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008783704,0.0004492071,0.00073382177,0.0018300009,0.005989597,0.010300413,0.002879324,0.0066912635,0.009653198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023059996,0.00047223034,0.0006996061,0.0022719544,0.030822514,0.007889226,0.005012426,0.0063885385,0.0019262605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033920812,0.0000056892227,0.000116220464,0.000013632996,0.00000175256,0.00006402347,0.0009658765,0.000405332,0.000030102443,0.9843329,0.0069399406,0.0071211522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018409606,0.00002750961,0.0008552636,0.00022120208,0.000014030368,0.00020708654,0.0015481064,0.0016271292,0.00028661624,0.53649384,0.45866743,0.00003339206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10049989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059352916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10049989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018672979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022427438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19982988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382467350","doi":"10.1515/9781553392064-014","title":"The Law of Succession and the Canadian Crown","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Crown (dentistry); Geography; Biology; Ecology; Medicine; Orthodontics","score_opus":0.015323582701432723,"score_gpt":0.22669393358456114,"score_spread":0.21137035088312842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382467350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006611117,0.015890524,0.0006607042,0.03281597,0.00094534847,0.000033699653,0.00009952033,0.000032835072,0.9429103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3788273,0.0121563645,0.0012807621,0.012394389,0.00060183695,0.000057372854,0.00007897167,0.00007223788,0.59453076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957616,0.00039839346,0.00006509483,0.00033237343,0.0015559886,0.0018866691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871016,0.00024985126,0.000047038877,0.00006211139,0.00058389973,0.0003469695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019180796,0.0005262736,0.0005146519,0.001973391,0.02095383,0.010528814,0.0020268103,0.006090177,0.016733347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064022434,0.0006204223,0.00037156872,0.003609551,0.02093273,0.0028630472,0.0024158063,0.00692518,0.0012957014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084043,0.000006514078,0.00014143481,0.000022379963,0.0000017889694,0.000044334396,0.0013730848,0.00014506858,0.00002750004,0.9455562,0.045023825,0.007649355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021185608,0.000010122604,0.0022894656,0.00028160345,0.000010161506,0.00005869338,0.0026556063,0.00039125487,0.00009054218,0.17904031,0.81510943,0.000041664993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99235016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09610665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09610665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1752846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6973058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385075546","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3891","title":"Transfer Theory and the Assignment of Contractual Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Property rights; Contract theory; Database transaction; Equity (law); Law; Transaction cost; Transfer (computing); Business; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.017517731011594675,"score_gpt":0.2934729145774008,"score_spread":0.2759551835658062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385075546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036444277,0.00321484,0.3203431,0.028914107,0.0005006681,0.00021482412,0.0001377804,0.00014976902,0.6100806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927124,0.0018124986,0.023769116,0.0029327075,0.00072966266,0.0004493532,0.00008145372,0.00009173438,0.04300948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893867,0.005023147,0.0003651071,0.0013406809,0.0026761745,0.0012082064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993962,0.0032377508,0.00053126935,0.0012351223,0.0006862062,0.0003476902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010467668,0.00055242993,0.00074897095,0.0020444929,0.005148892,0.006383544,0.0025968095,0.00548204,0.010348536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013449131,0.00053197064,0.0012389018,0.001816466,0.042795777,0.013737048,0.0049371067,0.005889823,0.0013713816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024262572,0.0000039808774,0.000026337739,0.0000043106443,0.000001251293,0.000011814843,0.000120440396,0.00018550214,0.000013122565,0.9986242,0.0002151021,0.00079153874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008717517,0.000006289875,0.000050373856,0.000012758253,0.0000020508878,0.000020600335,0.00006374402,0.0007481382,0.000041661788,0.994665,0.0043772412,0.0000033354338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005697843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023706036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010467668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009053557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058472026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06568849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385287340","doi":"10.1017/9781009038157.043","title":"Index","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04104454313276803,"score_gpt":0.28071116912985095,"score_spread":0.2396666259970829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385287340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007790279,0.008935076,0.0028237957,0.010028793,0.015161377,0.0011918689,0.15521964,0.003414122,0.80244625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024861854,0.009568476,0.0015508377,0.0018086435,0.0044597937,0.0005869684,0.072570875,0.0009700198,0.9059983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985348,0.000115343915,0.00020675226,0.0001691631,0.0008619411,0.00011202324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928531,0.0007741448,0.00041730885,0.0004966135,0.004808606,0.0006502251],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00103123,0.00108868,0.0010274457,0.008646777,0.0014029772,0.005809096,0.001412756,0.0009086619,0.7301713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010749082,0.0004361803,0.00056446216,0.010335598,0.00038463992,0.0034898443,0.0016650074,0.0012899694,0.6398477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015747437,0.000010019592,0.00007853163,0.00034829476,0.0000017053095,0.00001529711,0.000023494913,0.000053321022,0.00008378077,0.0012942017,0.9528219,0.045253735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028631757,0.000008555033,0.00032971834,0.00020102045,0.0000018623667,0.000014540073,0.00002775171,0.000014365071,0.000048680417,0.000653012,0.99869365,0.000003976388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074972566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006360761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26982868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023060169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032533263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385311011","doi":"10.59962/9780774867931-017","title":"Quebec and the “Sign Law” Thirty Years after <i>Ford</i> and <i>Devine</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Law; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.01078159078428983,"score_gpt":0.1868412900050101,"score_spread":0.17605969922072026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385311011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060871704,0.028423313,0.00096093095,0.043363642,0.0018737604,0.000037496102,0.0005457021,0.00008612239,0.9186219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.072775096,0.007052037,0.0004857205,0.0052556386,0.00013362805,0.000029182778,0.00013909147,0.00006786248,0.9140618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990994,0.00013784913,0.000017749597,0.00009165505,0.00037294804,0.00028044407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994035,0.000113594004,0.000023088656,0.00004132734,0.0003408498,0.00007765092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006345344,0.0005332009,0.00037179372,0.001131525,0.010391795,0.008148479,0.0010987672,0.0031212752,0.03744612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020477402,0.00045126633,0.00037754828,0.0026375265,0.005106212,0.0027560678,0.0012007956,0.003964736,0.0026174458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015865844,0.000020560967,0.0006075168,0.00006283806,0.000006935777,0.00013879388,0.0026613376,0.00023803841,0.000117428426,0.61866814,0.34650266,0.030959904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006541993,0.0000053443455,0.0012428494,0.00011785301,0.0000067623314,0.000040908013,0.0012184781,0.00014036988,0.00008839553,0.00907758,0.9880383,0.000016664208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058645487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058645487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065701686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4255048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312500","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-009","title":"Intergovernmental Relations and the Supreme Court of Canada: The Changing Place of the Provinces in Judicial Selection Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Judicial reform; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.009579303973200167,"score_gpt":0.1965910321448836,"score_spread":0.18701172817168343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061197463,0.035835337,0.0019550156,0.17517042,0.00086664903,0.000064966756,0.0006513944,0.00007275834,0.724186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82523406,0.010698924,0.001344866,0.015448649,0.0002487012,0.0000440912,0.00013893886,0.00007879583,0.14676298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947984,0.0007490595,0.000063313484,0.00033465802,0.0014894092,0.0025652037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716115,0.0008492252,0.00011592724,0.00008878834,0.0010702746,0.00071465364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002602424,0.0003349654,0.00043552738,0.0018584365,0.0205961,0.015041421,0.002324029,0.0050971652,0.0073354654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008646867,0.00057804654,0.00033429803,0.0058883973,0.014715706,0.0029965634,0.0020929729,0.0064497646,0.00042436708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024937937,0.000012338618,0.0012855051,0.000041377054,0.000010025984,0.000096751704,0.0043696626,0.0006213638,0.00009770108,0.92595893,0.05409897,0.013382426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067799396,0.000017959997,0.01921397,0.0006608425,0.00005441562,0.00007827902,0.016111393,0.0021144701,0.00041918107,0.28046778,0.6806555,0.00013838649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17097063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17097063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3246769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96155655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385326236","doi":"10.1017/9781009329934.011","title":"General Index","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.044768549274999604,"score_gpt":0.2529641941198404,"score_spread":0.2081956448448408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385326236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044902266,0.014757371,0.0027663433,0.00707689,0.011490893,0.00080302556,0.05451447,0.0031264077,0.90501565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001201538,0.011757318,0.0011932518,0.0014647269,0.0028939801,0.00031581573,0.026647225,0.00077717646,0.95374894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992399,0.000054739514,0.00007670854,0.00011631525,0.00044908214,0.00006321255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972873,0.00031638786,0.00015298685,0.00022674208,0.0016795518,0.00033707236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006797635,0.001060652,0.0011181148,0.007841697,0.0011964518,0.0049197855,0.0017444721,0.0011947305,0.72344446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048317253,0.000575582,0.0005536421,0.009914672,0.00042478135,0.0036807726,0.0015378682,0.0015497082,0.6323893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008240194,0.000014149199,0.000045226512,0.00028502918,0.0000011611401,0.000016059004,0.000018044984,0.00004659403,0.00008238744,0.001602543,0.94635224,0.05152834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016762425,0.000005681368,0.00017563875,0.00014337813,0.0000011086823,0.000019642215,0.000012769371,0.00001001494,0.000026683974,0.00063727534,0.9989631,0.00000305365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006468124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072535863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27655554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022152374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00225894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3944729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385509236","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3745","title":"The Class Actions Controversy: The Origins and Development of the Ontario Class Proceedings Act by Suzanne Chiodo","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Class (philosophy); Wrongdoing; Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Mechanism (biology); New class; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024855600549487333,"score_gpt":0.2710226018568361,"score_spread":0.24616700130734875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385509236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022667784,0.03807852,0.0008041358,0.4373056,0.0030601968,0.00007251914,0.00021564288,0.000032300457,0.49776325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43479288,0.03479769,0.0010894409,0.062482156,0.0021398992,0.00016159672,0.00015066456,0.00012562292,0.46425998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962489,0.00061654387,0.00006117876,0.0002803441,0.0018807956,0.0009122096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954627,0.0017524444,0.00036235937,0.0001506012,0.0013565909,0.00091516593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027907249,0.00027655522,0.00033674872,0.0012114794,0.028282743,0.009001817,0.0014970432,0.0053441077,0.0054471535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008275902,0.0005717735,0.0002843192,0.0021302092,0.028843803,0.0038971638,0.003685581,0.005733429,0.00064018945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031199488,0.00002056869,0.0024509917,0.000085256164,0.000006545459,0.00027456222,0.03896156,0.00014226125,0.00016076006,0.5958133,0.34214744,0.019905562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001095966,0.000004146953,0.0047643753,0.00018576856,0.000006775686,0.000032642987,0.008432418,0.00007449059,0.000088339795,0.013589583,0.9727802,0.00003011492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9646561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98376775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10485001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10485001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12452673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7607436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510009","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1431","title":"Joe’s Justice: Substantive, Procedural and Remedial Equality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Remedial education; Adjudication; Law; Statute; Economic Justice; Political science; Champion; Constitutional law; Procedural justice; Sociology; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.06489671300055498,"score_gpt":0.3705517571365437,"score_spread":0.3056550441359887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038267095,0.031191528,0.015568743,0.382104,0.0033270968,0.000120557444,0.00008475387,0.000068504596,0.52926767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80176675,0.0038725615,0.005105854,0.121402085,0.0019242195,0.00019543548,0.000029433975,0.00006775941,0.06563595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97567844,0.007936034,0.00088816567,0.0031178542,0.006978613,0.005400917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99052876,0.006401234,0.0003999184,0.0005781971,0.0013769969,0.00071480795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017719593,0.00040043908,0.0011583031,0.002058438,0.016366437,0.018707484,0.001980481,0.0194037,0.0028062037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024737058,0.00064987905,0.0009152902,0.0014202388,0.056134418,0.011137615,0.0076622986,0.022343308,0.00043097185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051004454,0.000007492188,0.000117006006,0.000017331075,0.000004694791,0.000082159066,0.0022399304,0.000043642634,0.00006208823,0.9897942,0.004953879,0.002672616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002865544,0.000045435867,0.0014025033,0.00034570709,0.00003056468,0.00023821498,0.00472643,0.00027668796,0.0005242217,0.6646661,0.3276372,0.00007836745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09427407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12642491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09427407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012123447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026027435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18745065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510423","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3713","title":"The Puzzle of Soft Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Soft law; Law; Hard law; Jurisprudence; Public law; Constitution; Philosophy of law; Subject (documents); Common law; Relation (database); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; International law","score_opus":0.025728333104963322,"score_gpt":0.3099818433026857,"score_spread":0.2842535101977224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048255812,0.008914226,0.017704895,0.23431566,0.0006075572,0.000077588484,0.00022845557,0.00012848726,0.6897673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93242115,0.003767853,0.0050889817,0.017341277,0.0003697583,0.00004654266,0.00007005122,0.00007777166,0.04081649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930662,0.0011259901,0.00014542599,0.00076701713,0.003291209,0.00160431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387944,0.0022579506,0.00029594035,0.00057613465,0.0018664246,0.0011240538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004899527,0.0004519189,0.0005721437,0.0024486226,0.020680368,0.014907008,0.0019942038,0.003618732,0.006483163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010004191,0.00029949952,0.0004915623,0.0020562636,0.08813274,0.0061329077,0.0049887956,0.0062802173,0.0007315689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034100754,0.0000043084706,0.00037418187,0.00002027592,0.000003306552,0.000050727154,0.002244768,0.000148835,0.000059332928,0.98304176,0.0074236006,0.0066254674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010683415,0.0000087636845,0.0026325628,0.00019807635,0.000011242538,0.00008054492,0.006601554,0.0008172127,0.0001886235,0.8227717,0.16664276,0.00003626288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8123162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81458837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8123162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06216734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0887528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45105773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511152","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3580","title":"Protection for Owners under the Law on Adverse Possession: An Inconsistent Use Test or a Qualified Veto System?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Possession (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Irish; Context (archaeology); Adverse possession; Test (biology); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; History; Politics; Land law","score_opus":0.1357513140918932,"score_gpt":0.36448162716542193,"score_spread":0.22873031307352873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19958057,0.0021518297,0.07241149,0.1450423,0.0013747237,0.00050821574,0.00035483303,0.00016486405,0.5784112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94444484,0.000501459,0.008864713,0.02634957,0.00045852453,0.00020055902,0.00007476233,0.00004159801,0.019063903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976934,0.007499808,0.0013311779,0.0030329674,0.006979155,0.004222834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97232425,0.013334377,0.0035219109,0.005347331,0.0042299544,0.0012421984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019595655,0.00036519082,0.00092350354,0.0013501747,0.0036634803,0.011441507,0.004056148,0.012188574,0.004825076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04993459,0.00066402194,0.0011868215,0.00095593004,0.026348345,0.01130854,0.0053809527,0.010434653,0.0008779446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027527354,0.00002756203,0.0031312904,0.000044125056,0.000011451212,0.00021192695,0.0016165255,0.00020742952,0.00034940513,0.9818184,0.0037456898,0.008808775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019824316,0.0005933696,0.014846783,0.0011094963,0.00014026866,0.0010637059,0.008692601,0.00495543,0.002841558,0.80830634,0.15696755,0.00028464862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023475558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02980224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023475558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062072603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012520094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10363293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518275","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2753","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commission; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01438471046012162,"score_gpt":0.28533650610443456,"score_spread":0.27095179564431293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065567065,0.004270868,0.0014310562,0.021033153,0.023203803,0.00012801978,0.003976214,0.0006455199,0.94465584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040965914,0.0030632103,0.00093077275,0.007211026,0.004549939,0.00009677115,0.0031501183,0.00036670218,0.97653484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841344,0.00017634447,0.00007896171,0.0003003714,0.0008230016,0.00020786167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797875,0.00032752616,0.000090126494,0.000245482,0.0010034848,0.00035463567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010816704,0.00073828426,0.00053041347,0.0017161637,0.002392036,0.0070007714,0.0016033273,0.0029577424,0.5274111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005346678,0.00031488255,0.0006284428,0.001719752,0.0009703957,0.004397237,0.0028862774,0.002618473,0.3239794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013567851,0.000016098644,0.0001454306,0.00008983694,0.0000015988778,0.0000384632,0.00019067804,0.000025541824,0.00008507691,0.018758591,0.93478924,0.045845848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013505818,0.0000038723333,0.0001440892,0.000051621413,5.707564e-7,0.000022559103,0.00007732062,0.0000080396085,0.000017591532,0.001235817,0.99843484,0.0000022730346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059227394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007837747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5274111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023920962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036108526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6740907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385523923","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1361","title":"The Explosive Global Growth of Personal Insolvency and the Concomitant Birth of the Study of Comparative Consumer Bankruptcy: Consumer Bankruptcy in Global Perspective, by Johanna Niemi-Kiesilainen, Lain Ramsay &amp; William C. Whitford (eds.); Comparative Consumer Insolvency Regimes: A Canadian Perspective, by Jacob S. Ziegel","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Concomitant; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Art; Internal medicine; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.026987261071751922,"score_gpt":0.3141772551605752,"score_spread":0.2871899940888233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385523923","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023405213,0.59528977,0.002770446,0.110673055,0.0009895414,0.000012182157,0.00016708308,0.000039226914,0.26665348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42961338,0.52040094,0.0031637137,0.012059458,0.0033065602,0.000035365643,0.00014706666,0.00007863455,0.031194927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992218,0.00025496725,0.000021661577,0.00011790393,0.00026180892,0.00012186873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788517,0.001201528,0.00024635223,0.00013153453,0.00028132883,0.00025405159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014381709,0.0005070867,0.00057430915,0.0033121158,0.00257051,0.0093952175,0.00052777963,0.0031927803,0.006231767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001873332,0.00025082327,0.00036049538,0.009255758,0.016227076,0.0066999244,0.0024580082,0.0033251385,0.00044636684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020737642,0.00001801642,0.0023227008,0.0002272669,0.000020184496,0.00014327776,0.010329575,0.00055142253,0.00017630678,0.8677492,0.06027126,0.058170136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071623954,0.000024606803,0.0169578,0.000887747,0.00002534422,0.000438422,0.014057308,0.0005739562,0.00020920172,0.29186952,0.6749198,0.000029085626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057809718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15422618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9421903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008575381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004469517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114946425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385533227","doi":"10.1515/9780773548916","title":"Daunting Enterprise of the Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021421797113788974,"score_gpt":0.25128350316278025,"score_spread":0.22986170604899128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385533227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023816624,0.057869803,0.002741074,0.2155867,0.006728473,0.00002431285,0.00004962362,0.00010080031,0.7145176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09096408,0.039358072,0.002142154,0.04504356,0.0075130146,0.00008870225,0.00007662921,0.00018052047,0.8146332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678564,0.0012247156,0.00007115203,0.00040340697,0.0011850296,0.00032999477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802196,0.0010056681,0.00008207702,0.00020963099,0.00041476116,0.00026589888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027430179,0.00056636316,0.0003730637,0.0016775852,0.0083706435,0.011521811,0.0007817686,0.003691885,0.010329367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005194708,0.00035368986,0.00031685625,0.0010696433,0.027629424,0.010599239,0.004542921,0.006664899,0.0034393296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023197258,0.000005414696,0.0000491551,0.000026310854,8.3813467e-7,0.000043809145,0.0033029292,0.000031446725,0.00004798479,0.801047,0.18063031,0.01481242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001194346,0.0000033468261,0.00010252619,0.00013079103,8.649896e-7,0.00005501823,0.0015416235,0.00005406359,0.000037943773,0.058871575,0.93919647,0.000004627936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028883355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040276144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028883355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01057456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0116575705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385569617","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4522241","title":"Why is Administrative Law So Complicated?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04744585952975093,"score_gpt":0.36412298504470575,"score_spread":0.3166771255149548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385569617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010960465,0.003550605,0.006814743,0.92525214,0.0017537923,0.000023754686,0.00010723247,0.0001420189,0.051395245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5682991,0.004488859,0.008552914,0.39063054,0.008701167,0.00017717957,0.0002290245,0.00044035332,0.018480893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97998744,0.006159595,0.0009350546,0.002666628,0.007234344,0.003017058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89181346,0.06287196,0.0080565205,0.011435684,0.0172302,0.008592101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023879535,0.00031121608,0.0011494627,0.0026710187,0.010027506,0.019621214,0.0028109709,0.013028636,0.011424304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09890094,0.0008428443,0.001278235,0.0034377053,0.048192788,0.027001733,0.007799979,0.019275373,0.0038361843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033674998,0.00005690902,0.0031690763,0.00014810727,0.00005593848,0.00027862907,0.0050822035,0.00029165426,0.00016489865,0.8362893,0.13324632,0.021183252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021056543,0.000008170368,0.0016633024,0.00014864698,0.000010327822,0.00020226535,0.0032633767,0.00022323384,0.000065742264,0.90505624,0.08930583,0.000031697913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008990407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00920339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023879535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063498816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013068492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1262886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589675","doi":"10.59962/9780774867306-003","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.027962145102645344,"score_gpt":0.2245751724434967,"score_spread":0.19661302734085134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009034228,0.008962457,0.02893463,0.11087897,0.07837498,0.0016666661,0.09869254,0.0063904077,0.6570652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04297023,0.00509456,0.026674097,0.028684283,0.0056998744,0.001510114,0.05644567,0.005226295,0.8276949],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621993,0.0007411029,0.0001869441,0.00069100823,0.0018655853,0.00029549995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875244,0.0014363932,0.00030877336,0.0008080236,0.007827468,0.0020949186],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039848695,0.00091323,0.0013323443,0.0019035963,0.0021451307,0.0028273114,0.0022215417,0.0012998093,0.389908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017433742,0.00030392146,0.0007062767,0.001835008,0.0006481783,0.002228922,0.0038344099,0.0025703863,0.2515324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007747189,0.000019291176,0.00068295,0.00019446567,0.000007514215,0.0001849735,0.0003488079,0.00014221268,0.0006162785,0.0071115736,0.9515794,0.03903503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012144608,0.000010486334,0.0005803375,0.00011843289,0.0000068080135,0.00019474638,0.00031308606,0.00010626567,0.0002690418,0.0018736954,0.9965055,0.000009520275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005352773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009272466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61009204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026565038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044544064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8702222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591318","doi":"10.59962/9780774864589-002","title":"Preface","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.028937447820582024,"score_gpt":0.21479794533682936,"score_spread":0.18586049751624734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044170814,0.004346418,0.0012665613,0.0063379086,0.015649693,0.0001715905,0.0053231874,0.00059111195,0.96587175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001836564,0.0026599576,0.00089948834,0.001266092,0.001937295,0.00005538126,0.0035528003,0.00032436548,0.9874681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937624,0.000049243466,0.000022900336,0.00007088084,0.00042550897,0.000055189572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790984,0.00021252793,0.000043230695,0.0001318573,0.0014680155,0.00023460686],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005353117,0.00058683835,0.0005443681,0.0024590315,0.002739192,0.0034784225,0.0011437638,0.0009601685,0.48296192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034072967,0.00032067197,0.00036560447,0.0024466107,0.00061333046,0.0019275142,0.0011515592,0.0021521368,0.24521136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066346092,0.000008276141,0.00004206516,0.000050067312,5.3378113e-7,0.000023064054,0.00007829377,0.000035196197,0.000065294356,0.0055605476,0.9661559,0.027974106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.6118005e-7,0.0000024003948,0.00011026699,0.00004938943,4.117238e-7,0.000022944441,0.000043649037,0.000011222215,0.000021756056,0.000745516,0.9989899,0.0000017039457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03779819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061654896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5170381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036348829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034299577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600293","doi":"10.59962/9780774829335","title":"Public Interest, Private Property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Private property; Property (philosophy); Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08799029292626344,"score_gpt":0.23758876820771235,"score_spread":0.14959847528144893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062772736,0.020503202,0.0012380399,0.012044736,0.0007394849,0.000029022802,0.000045869074,0.000041689415,0.9647302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060764268,0.020228406,0.0015485026,0.0135603715,0.0011488283,0.00011946181,0.00012884827,0.000112467176,0.9023887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854726,0.00033561236,0.000039635604,0.00021489609,0.0006297977,0.00023274864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934226,0.00027729894,0.00004134219,0.000110409776,0.00014456124,0.000084167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010068782,0.00057757134,0.00042831112,0.0011787781,0.004068891,0.009987406,0.0010483759,0.0038735727,0.021326171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024856841,0.0002950111,0.00028390964,0.0022742958,0.013648238,0.008807794,0.0033526472,0.0048965313,0.0053654406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026083726,0.00001183972,0.0000313018,0.00005057844,7.5204133e-7,0.00003089667,0.000985476,0.000081443504,0.000033934553,0.9147079,0.06604973,0.018013446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032378348,0.000004325353,0.000087971224,0.00015534546,0.0000014433382,0.00005044936,0.0006204812,0.00004564653,0.00002782382,0.13547328,0.863527,0.0000029047799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031823475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047026645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031823475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010861842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012346765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078808546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600429","doi":"10.59962/9780774829335-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04984354667820352,"score_gpt":0.24560359333015533,"score_spread":0.19576004665195182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023911553,0.004714942,0.007757583,0.06171757,0.036154214,0.0006395284,0.015646348,0.0013620703,0.8696165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008246841,0.0021838858,0.004659885,0.009531134,0.0022199205,0.00032327446,0.0064068814,0.0008128631,0.9656153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754333,0.00044503107,0.00009696091,0.0002863046,0.0014748883,0.0001535284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99210316,0.0008821881,0.00022951093,0.0003697658,0.005292727,0.0011226181],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023997736,0.00051588024,0.0005104056,0.001684993,0.0020711776,0.0027521884,0.001405375,0.0010165002,0.27276003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011021302,0.00022423628,0.00031011103,0.0015286687,0.0005652568,0.0019158963,0.0023644238,0.0024219758,0.17474164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011563894,0.000007509099,0.00014517251,0.000055373137,0.0000010394481,0.00005521689,0.0003924101,0.00003284394,0.00010347769,0.008887756,0.9701595,0.02014818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012374915,0.0000017550566,0.00011887681,0.000047025278,7.0595723e-7,0.000044373006,0.00019435713,0.000016078166,0.000033105127,0.00068587874,0.99885476,0.0000019076067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00657138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013639915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72723997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028577526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035321417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9124732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385690589","doi":"10.32920/23913132","title":"“The Legal Billy Club”: First Nations, Injunctions, and the Public Interest","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Indigenous; Principle of legality; Politics; Treaty; Public interest; Common law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.07844834672382082,"score_gpt":0.3348369343114589,"score_spread":0.25638858758763805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385690589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11155449,0.01277373,0.0057867276,0.21299544,0.0005999933,0.00003480687,0.000046535846,0.000044531742,0.6561638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641649,0.0014026152,0.00061607634,0.008258673,0.00022891782,0.000025724143,0.000011167831,0.000016415506,0.025275467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589086,0.00179892,0.00006385698,0.00036469393,0.0007179123,0.0011637075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970253,0.0017200233,0.00031809497,0.0002059925,0.00029941904,0.0004312868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035357014,0.00017135034,0.00024316816,0.0011617347,0.013501591,0.012067972,0.0013519169,0.006663551,0.005198837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006382385,0.0001864075,0.00034019933,0.0010945059,0.052037686,0.007121567,0.004530083,0.0069132503,0.00027684914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021178234,0.000005168112,0.00032651122,0.0000074213567,8.023248e-7,0.000098341625,0.0045267874,0.00003334212,0.000024182002,0.9908365,0.0022527934,0.0018859897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017463182,0.000032156182,0.007601198,0.0005281027,0.000016309174,0.00038233947,0.048916355,0.0012248562,0.00063796,0.6230876,0.31749874,0.000056941444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.162465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19045852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.837535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01756173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013876739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3230387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385690722","doi":"10.32920/23913132.v1","title":"“The Legal Billy Club”: First Nations, Injunctions, and the Public Interest","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Indigenous; Principle of legality; Law; Politics; Public interest; Treaty; Context (archaeology); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.07844834672382082,"score_gpt":0.3348369343114589,"score_spread":0.25638858758763805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385690722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11155449,0.01277373,0.0057867276,0.21299544,0.0005999933,0.00003480687,0.000046535846,0.000044531742,0.6561638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641649,0.0014026152,0.00061607634,0.008258673,0.00022891782,0.000025724143,0.000011167831,0.000016415506,0.025275467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589086,0.00179892,0.00006385698,0.00036469393,0.0007179123,0.0011637075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970253,0.0017200233,0.00031809497,0.0002059925,0.00029941904,0.0004312868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035357014,0.00017135034,0.00024316816,0.0011617347,0.013501591,0.012067972,0.0013519169,0.006663551,0.005198837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006382385,0.0001864075,0.00034019933,0.0010945059,0.052037686,0.007121567,0.004530083,0.0069132503,0.00027684914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021178234,0.000005168112,0.00032651122,0.0000074213567,8.023248e-7,0.000098341625,0.0045267874,0.00003334212,0.000024182002,0.9908365,0.0022527934,0.0018859897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017463182,0.000032156182,0.007601198,0.0005281027,0.000016309174,0.00038233947,0.048916355,0.0012248562,0.00063796,0.6230876,0.31749874,0.000056941444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.162465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19045852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.162465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01756173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013876739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3230387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385829522","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0112","title":"Public nuisance for private persons","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Private law; Liability; Law and economics; Private sphere; Private rights; Political science; Business; Law; Public law; Public sphere; Economics","score_opus":0.0642349668068549,"score_gpt":0.2884805393198329,"score_spread":0.224245572512978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385829522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03360821,0.0015909531,0.06746791,0.026773578,0.00052802655,0.00011959753,0.00015257172,0.0001727898,0.86958635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744822,0.00093756337,0.008268536,0.0062539373,0.00056882604,0.00022717234,0.00012258314,0.00012561165,0.10901351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941095,0.0018661988,0.00021391311,0.0011371718,0.0013313193,0.0013419434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951125,0.0016596036,0.0004691681,0.0017503724,0.00065890054,0.0003494962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044883396,0.00061402965,0.0007394401,0.0010125736,0.007142126,0.010218661,0.0015947007,0.011071999,0.0154706845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008952665,0.0004320574,0.0013294372,0.00066773023,0.022643501,0.01249813,0.007792741,0.0091987075,0.0028954106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003133994,0.000007573955,0.00006480563,0.0000055255878,9.716246e-7,0.000039332175,0.0003873991,0.00005975682,0.000041593517,0.99720323,0.00093947264,0.0012472656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014873098,0.00003777108,0.00040198574,0.00014324962,0.00001570479,0.00030288054,0.0008922573,0.0008038998,0.0005334443,0.8677277,0.1290983,0.000027951412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00428199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044514257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154706845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004240244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058671962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051754594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385852533","doi":"10.1017/9781009374712.010","title":"Contracts, Organizations, And Institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04490424621993378,"score_gpt":0.25450702202126857,"score_spread":0.2096027758013348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385852533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010431051,0.07062064,0.0013788344,0.022008251,0.0027728453,0.00006072775,0.001938678,0.00014246145,0.9000344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01712123,0.045813072,0.0008610986,0.0030949067,0.0013076843,0.00008962119,0.001523298,0.000086261214,0.93010277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959594,0.000063597465,0.000016177999,0.000042391795,0.00023247435,0.000049444378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945027,0.00014711826,0.000033937384,0.000043615215,0.00025614363,0.00006891265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050073833,0.00042807052,0.00032760148,0.0015164706,0.001072879,0.003710583,0.00039285532,0.0010638325,0.1158518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017350502,0.00022483722,0.00015861732,0.0033453878,0.0009552563,0.0031399406,0.0006605381,0.0011059474,0.018191623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067406613,0.000009109387,0.00006778919,0.00012856278,0.0000014689207,0.000015026763,0.00019194384,0.00024588255,0.000051069197,0.14884104,0.8129043,0.037537027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011086237,0.0000037032976,0.00020235986,0.0001553131,8.3594927e-7,0.000015811791,0.000127442,0.000043685995,0.000013453725,0.015925499,0.983509,0.0000017595854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01326028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015765127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1158518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036661355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031519108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38756287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386131659","doi":"10.59962/9780774854832-011","title":"Land Claims in British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; History","score_opus":0.027607143685420343,"score_gpt":0.22767325146242687,"score_spread":0.20006610777700654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386131659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13762091,0.014062606,0.00018797826,0.019206775,0.000387993,0.000051967767,0.003715232,0.000063057436,0.82470345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45325676,0.0055279625,0.00026177397,0.002862863,0.00005430366,0.0000369903,0.0009760677,0.000050036655,0.5369733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985285,0.00009483657,0.000053382264,0.00012484805,0.0005469624,0.00065150484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850863,0.00022236485,0.00007028755,0.00006342804,0.0008636131,0.00027170114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063944247,0.00021565065,0.0003666296,0.0032446678,0.008878146,0.007135749,0.0012865517,0.0021812972,0.023979101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033039656,0.00041182022,0.0002320169,0.007576087,0.0019954294,0.0012470144,0.001541598,0.0029514425,0.0014284749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013639277,0.00012654369,0.030362917,0.00029080786,0.00005212113,0.0016953365,0.014478703,0.001746502,0.00056165986,0.3230637,0.47782817,0.14965722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018516554,0.000015768357,0.09488863,0.00044195986,0.000034371107,0.00017532147,0.015045326,0.001011398,0.00033238632,0.009106348,0.878848,0.00008199328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9895901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99698406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07134485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07134485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058850437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5176456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386139504","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197664582.002.0005","title":"Preface","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Tort; Law; Nothing; Economic Justice; Common law; Political science; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Commercial law; Comparative law; Duty; Philosophy; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.08473007198369503,"score_gpt":0.3375004171655543,"score_spread":0.25277034518185926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386139504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007440247,0.004045881,0.001609572,0.011910936,0.028944205,0.0003032001,0.0146587435,0.00079898513,0.9369844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003791745,0.0024774496,0.0007432916,0.0030346995,0.0051141595,0.00018714348,0.010893976,0.0006079325,0.9731496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992354,0.00009699597,0.000054087293,0.00014888687,0.000385864,0.00007884642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976044,0.0004132682,0.00010572353,0.0002634126,0.0013412696,0.00027191784],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007432664,0.0008142518,0.0006750733,0.0025371208,0.0026969456,0.004311328,0.0012348408,0.0012680214,0.63208747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060706274,0.00040708212,0.00054599694,0.002894914,0.0007770049,0.0034123168,0.0022486665,0.002660691,0.45925096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015123194,0.000011300218,0.000058393227,0.00009822881,0.0000011825548,0.000033970613,0.00007209206,0.000028687315,0.00005523838,0.0046430505,0.97150934,0.023473501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024529213,0.0000055743394,0.00019632373,0.00009347988,6.962388e-7,0.00003322195,0.00007857327,0.000010435115,0.00003121012,0.0011167808,0.99842876,0.0000025294992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006273971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006558913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36791253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022674613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025042838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386335375","doi":"10.1093/he/9780192857170.001.0001","title":"The Principles of Equity &amp; Trusts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Fiduciary; Equity (law); Trust law; Doctrine; Law; Settlor; Political science; Common law; Unjust enrichment; Context (archaeology); Duty; Express trust; Testamentary trust; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Restitution","score_opus":0.10526924285240073,"score_gpt":0.3175519106013819,"score_spread":0.21228266774898114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386335375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001804289,0.005186952,0.010857372,0.022795785,0.000771804,0.000054413325,0.00007913258,0.0000577982,0.95839244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3070874,0.00967783,0.009613209,0.009496809,0.0014402764,0.00029311405,0.000120879,0.00013681313,0.66213375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956462,0.0014029248,0.00017790048,0.0003181464,0.0019229135,0.00053190754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822015,0.0007272736,0.00020291106,0.00023777293,0.0004377348,0.00017412868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024702696,0.00043544854,0.00031907033,0.0008481119,0.0034771417,0.009773875,0.0008656696,0.0030220756,0.0089669265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060770037,0.0004060804,0.00033919894,0.0011595743,0.018361716,0.007567573,0.0035214503,0.0049823597,0.0036419271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.854151e-7,0.0000015943359,0.000017539278,0.000008708528,4.8680647e-7,0.000011292934,0.00036326027,0.000045266388,0.000009970655,0.9857114,0.011176529,0.0026530768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037162686,0.0000052425485,0.00013104099,0.00010669052,0.0000020544626,0.00008120565,0.0005693073,0.00026550316,0.00006236487,0.5299415,0.46882492,0.000006488016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008971664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006697763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009773875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00723869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070333527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052520573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386461436","doi":"10.1002/iir.1507","title":"Executory contracts in insolvency law: A global guide (2nd edition). By JasonChuah, EugenioVaccari, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2023. pp. 672. £220. ISBN: 978‐1‐80392‐341‐3","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Debtor; Bankruptcy; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Finance; Creditor; Debt","score_opus":0.028035428604549228,"score_gpt":0.3649176044356889,"score_spread":0.33688217583113966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386461436","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007733569,0.5494141,0.009616573,0.023923755,0.00948146,0.00020781219,0.0014634347,0.0009775934,0.40414193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005953219,0.32573813,0.011392221,0.009224888,0.0046012406,0.00041707428,0.0018881636,0.0008626466,0.63992244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907243,0.00015522412,0.000090915564,0.000107551474,0.00048719643,0.000086699634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990677,0.0004672795,0.00010978492,0.00006656704,0.0002020639,0.00008656687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001304475,0.0018840402,0.0012622043,0.0026608128,0.001199333,0.0056614596,0.0015476495,0.00393554,0.070013925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020896362,0.0014927968,0.0006908983,0.0035173781,0.0020018285,0.007864881,0.0028342823,0.004830707,0.050538234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010085064,0.000036574118,0.00008044523,0.00034575458,0.0000037493417,0.00006613553,0.00044449276,0.0003002974,0.00015417572,0.023640288,0.8606974,0.114220686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020792986,0.000006051338,0.00014978398,0.00053846696,9.585241e-7,0.0001002843,0.00010344152,0.00007940256,0.000021216169,0.004043366,0.9949498,0.000005151843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004748218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077326545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070013925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00200214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036262637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23421991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386649262","doi":"10.5040/9781509963690.ch-011","title":"The Essential Similarity of Express Trusts in England, Japan and Quebec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Genealogy; Geography; History; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015535285053106643,"score_gpt":0.30525421721821533,"score_spread":0.2897189321651087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386649262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5843155,0.0031010094,0.0016114374,0.0150088295,0.00012856722,0.000105440806,0.0030320012,0.00004938622,0.39264786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793003,0.0002832475,0.0001488778,0.00018005903,0.000007457938,0.000011067042,0.00016485291,0.000010072727,0.019894123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661773,0.0006806703,0.0001361251,0.00023771383,0.00084981695,0.0014778897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903121,0.0021194015,0.0010407565,0.0005008157,0.0044698687,0.0015570635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018036618,0.000117489224,0.00041269523,0.0018183681,0.0062784795,0.0038216196,0.0006954197,0.00085978623,0.018782202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013282835,0.00015203186,0.0002530608,0.003621964,0.003355859,0.0021906612,0.0016686224,0.0012770043,0.00050851144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004976571,0.000083848805,0.2115224,0.00036364282,0.00014593537,0.0022715619,0.07756879,0.001363039,0.0006670499,0.54079384,0.059049804,0.10567243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033366257,0.000047695285,0.78826886,0.00044665232,0.00010870299,0.00047746464,0.07609067,0.0019610953,0.00036101913,0.016970647,0.11514838,0.00008543659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97194463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98696357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97194463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037546262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027005518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2724185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386714369","doi":"10.1002/iir.1508","title":"<i>Bresco v Lonsdale</i> [2020] <scp>UKSC</scp> 25 [case comment]","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Citation; Computer science","score_opus":0.058012490604484976,"score_gpt":0.3884752632893208,"score_spread":0.3304627726848358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386714369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011956717,0.0031116814,0.0008617025,0.13930364,0.0027558217,0.0003025889,0.0011565969,0.00023446273,0.84031683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08580412,0.0014371293,0.0005685233,0.49425906,0.0011689111,0.00043700164,0.00061594846,0.00014703702,0.41556224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958003,0.00068551296,0.00023553094,0.00063357025,0.0011190205,0.0015259909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975623,0.0010832178,0.00016004837,0.00020655207,0.00070140226,0.0002864592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00284906,0.00078710244,0.0006162229,0.0010342529,0.011692244,0.009183974,0.003287994,0.03062201,0.034099106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00720364,0.001097435,0.0012363124,0.001388469,0.00395232,0.0026919944,0.0032896227,0.01783187,0.010924306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000838842,0.00005862683,0.001754871,0.00017383715,0.000019202502,0.0048390348,0.002386942,0.00013936896,0.000940141,0.123194195,0.8595812,0.006828647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003769061,0.000038494367,0.002881024,0.00044929518,0.000027320919,0.00081369106,0.0012364216,0.0001691636,0.00063465186,0.0058061355,0.9878149,0.000091194015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25993055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47718066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25993055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008374187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008583444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5168352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386778159","doi":"10.1017/cls.2023.21","title":"The Person and the Mirror: On the Colonial Force of Corporate Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Personhood; Colonialism; Representation (politics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.039351254317371014,"score_gpt":0.2776615338744066,"score_spread":0.2383102795570356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386778159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30577838,0.006413174,0.004603674,0.07468312,0.00042444354,0.000031232354,0.000029326544,0.000033940378,0.6080028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925373,0.0006136017,0.00028454445,0.0011651624,0.000040804873,0.0000029827795,0.0000020942168,0.000008330376,0.005345071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997047,0.0014649022,0.000050597115,0.00023739814,0.00060228445,0.00059783173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966614,0.0018551894,0.00027439767,0.00021539856,0.0005660148,0.0004274966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004175218,0.00019435563,0.00024368295,0.0013504995,0.01462416,0.008221271,0.00074428035,0.001983136,0.003328318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052821157,0.00020430442,0.00014620736,0.0010589143,0.075618416,0.0042197574,0.0043755886,0.0034543378,0.0001446861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006457777,0.000008415624,0.0008457645,0.000015284952,0.0000020381278,0.0001907647,0.15251124,0.000029746145,0.00012619591,0.8400091,0.0017272567,0.004527845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026541267,0.000046915655,0.008078688,0.00064715673,0.00002548727,0.0005833516,0.3134185,0.00058279943,0.0006000624,0.27471566,0.4012083,0.00006656102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43685743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5056241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43685743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01836114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014275035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8686293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386849606","doi":"10.1017/s0009840x23001713","title":"AN OVERVIEW OF ROMAN LAW - (D.) Johnston Roman Law in Context. Second edition. Pp. xiv + 221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022 (first edition 1999). Paper, £19.99, US$25.99 (Cased, £64.99, US$84.99). ISBN: 978-1-108-70016-0 (978-1-108-47630-0 hbk).","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Classical Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); History; Classics; Law; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.041620970206661355,"score_gpt":0.3083677576617886,"score_spread":0.26674678745512725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386849606","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028431724,0.92475164,0.0018988997,0.00994394,0.0014968242,0.000019003523,0.00015247955,0.00003406269,0.061418954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021097386,0.88571674,0.0045540794,0.004244771,0.0032431816,0.00011032333,0.00039747375,0.00009757025,0.08053847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858665,0.0005072251,0.00011278922,0.00014657623,0.0005556373,0.0000911791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998502,0.00078373676,0.00014762164,0.00008541534,0.0003996541,0.000081567654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001771979,0.00087719207,0.0010304374,0.0061550015,0.0012955163,0.0038609584,0.00087136275,0.0019695857,0.021397026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034924587,0.00054453156,0.0004630028,0.005508932,0.002966392,0.005495974,0.0014337929,0.002429186,0.0067089265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015644417,0.000027086635,0.00024232452,0.0021725788,0.000019651108,0.00010831306,0.0008204632,0.00026990415,0.00017935787,0.27075455,0.4754996,0.24989054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021829494,0.000010583083,0.0004986001,0.0022915206,0.0000047070744,0.00021490548,0.00031052166,0.00008047827,0.000059678918,0.054768737,0.94174737,0.000010713175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054909014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011551974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021397026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043163537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052652834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07158017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386941149","doi":"10.7202/1091999ar","title":"L’intérêt d’assurance en assurancede personnes : une étude de droit comparé","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03898895679449161,"score_gpt":0.32789608804657777,"score_spread":0.28890713125208617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386941149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48818773,0.165887,0.06504328,0.08319667,0.0029707605,0.00070759794,0.0015500801,0.00018139927,0.19227558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968652,0.012882771,0.010313723,0.0027646215,0.0005508324,0.00039268765,0.00022580219,0.00006105028,0.0041565555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.84607613,0.106341556,0.006449369,0.004747573,0.03362617,0.0027591726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5762476,0.346073,0.02971085,0.009618127,0.034866016,0.0034844044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07249039,0.00043605414,0.0011121157,0.0057532378,0.0027747988,0.007027397,0.00162438,0.0029618049,0.009287377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2686826,0.00036105735,0.0014894486,0.0063521294,0.007618426,0.009839676,0.00785861,0.004597339,0.0006060093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012601045,0.00045130053,0.14575934,0.0039436985,0.0009335125,0.0005651463,0.09172744,0.0015209207,0.00073806365,0.26617584,0.01420851,0.47271615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020557916,0.0037022356,0.39171508,0.015922043,0.00097267213,0.004352952,0.09195622,0.0052478504,0.0036135141,0.18241198,0.2994041,0.00049571303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053143427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07249039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008363107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063012647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3833704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386984756","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96073-6_9627","title":"Canon Collins Trust","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; Camargo Foundation; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Canada Council for the Arts; Government of Canada","keywords":"Canon; Political science; Sociology; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04573792933274908,"score_gpt":0.29403883567628,"score_spread":0.24830090634353089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386984756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024171243,0.0049189785,0.00083313097,0.0028233028,0.00085806876,0.00003837332,0.0012692801,0.0008135358,0.9882036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005953952,0.0015993096,0.00035298546,0.0003162358,0.000036353056,0.000017547347,0.00034574504,0.00035787272,0.9963785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986677,0.00013680689,0.00008930134,0.00042561968,0.00056115806,0.00011941593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695194,0.00053140725,0.00015384678,0.00046947712,0.0013425602,0.00055070216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007599627,0.0016267519,0.0011373471,0.0022850784,0.0038911984,0.009363432,0.0015034527,0.0035117117,0.7232665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037151354,0.001203842,0.0005415592,0.004755543,0.0014491666,0.0056138253,0.0029349504,0.003722147,0.5608006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033736116,0.000022377159,0.00011737435,0.00021934081,0.000003891765,0.00021961861,0.00026853656,0.00012922044,0.00022405188,0.02693028,0.8796906,0.092140995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021738938,0.0000028723164,0.00008365481,0.00010487672,9.057214e-7,0.0000496284,0.000086817345,0.000023672648,0.00006785461,0.00093072554,0.9986425,0.000004328148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030819317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08945934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27673352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039451728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004989255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39472675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387116868","doi":"10.1002/iir.1506","title":"Guest editorial: <scp>Insolvency‐related</scp> judgments and <scp>war‐related</scp> claims—Recent court practice in Ukraine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Citation; Political science; Law; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.021790397256705903,"score_gpt":0.36474190769796605,"score_spread":0.34295151044126015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387116868","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052374726,0.0058073862,0.000057995712,0.058657967,0.93261987,0.000028189988,0.000083919884,0.000030034942,0.0026623001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00063263695,0.0038854182,0.0000586082,0.031716783,0.9556316,0.000030111776,0.000036221005,0.00003702978,0.007971677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926359,0.001207258,0.0009776485,0.00081730355,0.0037512984,0.00061058736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689146,0.01593193,0.0023677654,0.0008126741,0.008695516,0.0032775954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011397221,0.0033670096,0.004301975,0.0067885523,0.005603013,0.01122201,0.003876654,0.026535742,0.016757615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035361495,0.001149294,0.0032999434,0.003613578,0.003468112,0.004156686,0.002800007,0.021037651,0.007779472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011700608,0.000005571526,0.0000151142585,0.00009883689,0.0000068364025,0.00006643998,0.000012256942,0.000010224517,0.000018080533,0.00015704663,0.99808085,0.0015170085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007346432,0.000020443365,0.00049333443,0.0010899022,0.00007544635,0.00022321419,0.000119114804,0.00014990967,0.00008967434,0.0013239946,0.99631566,0.0000257413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052973754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018731866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026535742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060392357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076028937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06027502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667228","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0060","title":"The Autonomy of Administration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Autonomy; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Doctrine; Presumption; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.018280407148459875,"score_gpt":0.27629386433761677,"score_spread":0.2580134571891569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018687973,0.007970555,0.05624638,0.16969685,0.0012706718,0.00008299692,0.00008742803,0.00026557167,0.74569166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8609457,0.0030437955,0.008643831,0.024795083,0.0016161376,0.00020562744,0.00008042631,0.00016703655,0.100502275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98261845,0.007928873,0.00068099133,0.002937558,0.0035663655,0.00226768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989106,0.004148341,0.00088565814,0.0023010296,0.0016283471,0.001930665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011331097,0.00036678844,0.0004861998,0.0008194447,0.006716618,0.0141256815,0.001320425,0.004424835,0.0036859824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014239738,0.0004350736,0.0007007148,0.00061821705,0.032887436,0.008360873,0.00785101,0.009342782,0.0016913062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037667567,0.000003889582,0.000102969156,0.000007739725,0.0000020489738,0.000015199441,0.0014640416,0.00006683272,0.000077152035,0.99254143,0.0030240386,0.0026909187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011462855,0.000019953612,0.00048423602,0.00010046984,0.0000056072595,0.00006781715,0.00071649003,0.00034661833,0.00021494669,0.5998964,0.3981157,0.000020415036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009168176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005974349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0141256815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007769166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016392965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05992526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387730473","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.17","title":"The Rise and Fall of Private Law - Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right Ernest J. Weinrib","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Reciprocal; Private law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025388265958959277,"score_gpt":0.2868824142261665,"score_spread":0.26149414826720724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387730473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017117297,0.030863654,0.0069642817,0.50408435,0.0011989379,0.000024370993,0.00010677052,0.000052347328,0.43958807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8756499,0.01776663,0.003399833,0.0239794,0.0010502968,0.000059505943,0.0000367994,0.00009172486,0.07796592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663347,0.0012494139,0.00010145538,0.0005827245,0.0009332849,0.0004997487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948127,0.0035692109,0.00024977286,0.00040777508,0.0005973807,0.00036319182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045880345,0.00020987811,0.000520008,0.0009985836,0.006502412,0.0109092,0.000637481,0.005719013,0.00616188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009432823,0.00031961375,0.00032661788,0.0010599131,0.03760632,0.010874468,0.0040437793,0.008412556,0.0007122393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042745164,0.000003214142,0.00004393561,0.0000065266104,7.2283615e-7,0.00001343209,0.00043089024,0.00004695043,0.00002403149,0.9913829,0.005743804,0.002299309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063712164,0.0000031227582,0.000275593,0.00007482457,0.0000018453483,0.000025859374,0.00052471895,0.00017570528,0.00007460761,0.9507588,0.04806942,0.000009072829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03382678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040574323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03382678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008827811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007835752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06725973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387976370","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2023-0011","title":"Magical Thinking and Appearance-based Recusal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Precept; Jurisprudence; Law; Obligation; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Moral obligation; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03865647748839743,"score_gpt":0.3557058915749545,"score_spread":0.31704941408655707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387976370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12587146,0.0024892576,0.088660456,0.041568123,0.00124344,0.00007776545,0.00005140879,0.0001662479,0.7398718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98855746,0.00023760005,0.0037361153,0.0011950204,0.00014218659,0.000017367887,0.000010678231,0.000042810592,0.0060607954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883343,0.007033655,0.00033253303,0.0013574614,0.0021868083,0.0007552626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858262,0.008772949,0.0014943468,0.0015474581,0.0019405938,0.00041841343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009337509,0.00044888325,0.00039767777,0.002204236,0.0048394306,0.008527942,0.0019666932,0.0035073997,0.004586641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018194122,0.00032395584,0.00048765488,0.00090014725,0.06812982,0.009995166,0.005322649,0.0068707145,0.00044154873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007121775,0.0000037455034,0.00008278428,0.000013315891,0.0000016941885,0.00007447222,0.008301071,0.000056161098,0.000051819014,0.9890216,0.00072050997,0.0016656871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015955155,0.000018199042,0.00030111943,0.00015090723,0.000010458787,0.00028356156,0.012485239,0.00088245946,0.0005269642,0.9208533,0.06444473,0.00002707711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018928103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025703972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009337509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004667767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025509377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04938209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388026852","doi":"10.7202/1106507ar","title":"Équité et bonne foi : perspectives historiques et contemporaines sur les distinctions fondamentales entre ces deux outils de justice contractuelle","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02525472919846003,"score_gpt":0.27297438862993223,"score_spread":0.2477196594314722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388026852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06479542,0.11432759,0.008209793,0.1159822,0.0020433492,0.00002982165,0.0001378283,0.000032366865,0.6944417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8954278,0.018377684,0.001451286,0.004887,0.00074266805,0.00004221399,0.00006951526,0.000047366153,0.0789544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510753,0.002141247,0.00015197643,0.00046633583,0.0011426324,0.0009903655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954209,0.0023426746,0.00052727095,0.000285197,0.0007871291,0.00063693826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006237466,0.0004608916,0.0005625112,0.0021874104,0.010869775,0.013425855,0.0010982862,0.003887059,0.0114691425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009393642,0.0002575213,0.00024476455,0.0033055046,0.04655345,0.01141101,0.0072268737,0.00573484,0.000644753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002068059,0.0000082019415,0.0005363886,0.00003826537,0.0000020234042,0.000052282114,0.027764402,0.00002773094,0.00003412441,0.95747197,0.004530124,0.009513884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019750521,0.000031188752,0.008377122,0.001119471,0.0000103487155,0.00034713378,0.067579776,0.00017797147,0.00030379184,0.34813395,0.57384497,0.000054496384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084798515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1547794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084798515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019194212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01261616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16860986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388269336","doi":"10.1017/9781108878272.015","title":"Index","year":2023,"lang":"sv","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.041543059896475186,"score_gpt":0.27301839199036293,"score_spread":0.23147533209388774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388269336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079935323,0.008338464,0.0028479253,0.010194777,0.015218232,0.0012009799,0.15692358,0.0035419145,0.80093485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025732573,0.008723363,0.0015193357,0.0017296275,0.004555506,0.00060093665,0.06995943,0.0009946803,0.90934396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985066,0.0001181268,0.00020954208,0.00016639543,0.0008877788,0.00011159995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925114,0.000836373,0.00045140355,0.00052452466,0.0050064386,0.0006698796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010262218,0.0010494876,0.0010291723,0.008894066,0.0014083894,0.005933974,0.0013879581,0.00091782835,0.73436606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011356782,0.00043665856,0.0005452756,0.01075178,0.00039263908,0.0035560776,0.0016668258,0.00131668,0.64082897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015041667,0.000009447585,0.000075925826,0.00032951168,0.0000015851367,0.000014749273,0.000023908078,0.00005107925,0.00007903022,0.0012820319,0.9547842,0.0433336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030148635,0.000009024149,0.00034219032,0.00019944066,0.0000018173588,0.000014826451,0.000029041963,0.00001523314,0.000048880305,0.00069154013,0.9986411,0.000004003663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073109753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060996143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26563394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023351426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032419008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416660","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0014","title":"Remedies for Breach of Contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Default; Law; Enforcement; State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Political science; Damages; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04399184211720365,"score_gpt":0.3229558516312798,"score_spread":0.2789640095140762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001750544,0.0065531,0.013510795,0.020662094,0.0014201825,0.00012416898,0.00006565867,0.00012591656,0.95578754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2644089,0.010683913,0.019598776,0.014648568,0.0018216165,0.000406488,0.00019505498,0.0002320408,0.68800455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993232,0.0021650475,0.00037732837,0.00068571826,0.0029725998,0.0005672554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964737,0.0015294837,0.0002411757,0.0006675788,0.00092572963,0.00016238194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004758277,0.000667526,0.00057245,0.0021639955,0.0045841946,0.0057451567,0.0018530497,0.008172199,0.029600365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012060118,0.00033840325,0.0007183669,0.0010338648,0.014360155,0.006501771,0.0035033487,0.008945243,0.004910177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027966828,0.000011742527,0.000033017957,0.00002716545,0.0000019710496,0.000079828395,0.00046322346,0.00018662325,0.00006287124,0.9658133,0.023321379,0.009996152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010104086,0.000017654993,0.00015807952,0.0004665577,0.00000573212,0.00022106437,0.00049782265,0.00051215076,0.0002513407,0.37905362,0.6187875,0.00001833911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006194798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007256259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029600365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006263384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007796046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099023044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416661","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0007","title":"The Force and Scope of Contractual Obligations: Standards of Care, Mistake, Frustration,","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vendor; Mistake; Scope (computer science); Obligation; Business; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Task (project management); Law; Economics; Political science; Marketing; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.015534662455140418,"score_gpt":0.29638882148936874,"score_spread":0.28085415903422833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024163505,0.009199945,0.05123888,0.05654589,0.0004799683,0.000091362665,0.000062724226,0.00005599479,0.8581617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95884097,0.0029863017,0.008753818,0.0041887993,0.00033687876,0.00013832057,0.000035049914,0.00006813986,0.024651738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97424895,0.01568476,0.0008932816,0.0010512699,0.0070894775,0.0010322676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96010584,0.03015567,0.0021621082,0.0022170465,0.00441243,0.00094691274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02268027,0.0004255297,0.0004611581,0.002183248,0.004508076,0.012883641,0.0017685327,0.0053440365,0.005638143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04719671,0.0004456791,0.0003238944,0.0019798516,0.05344787,0.012035339,0.004854949,0.0073810946,0.0006618538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028384914,0.000005233796,0.00009412404,0.000010790876,0.0000012429315,0.000027777014,0.0034151347,0.000110555484,0.00002221481,0.99106795,0.0016222004,0.003620112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068146633,0.000007739647,0.00048146056,0.00026885883,0.0000034255627,0.000104905375,0.0037297164,0.0007075126,0.0000928518,0.9585308,0.036052417,0.000013483811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061759977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058279466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02268027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008703876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009145929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11994618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416667","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0013","title":"Third Parties","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Law; Doctrine; Phrase; Law and economics; Business; Severability; Property (philosophy); Political science; Exclusion clause; Economics; Contract management; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03985253117171977,"score_gpt":0.2940940582925033,"score_spread":0.2542415271207835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054132857,0.001257102,0.005827703,0.0021258069,0.00038614962,0.0000377796,0.000096399825,0.00006200733,0.98966575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055202603,0.0023729254,0.0037859585,0.0035740298,0.00044034555,0.00015074316,0.00031643,0.00020332236,0.93395364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722266,0.00071468856,0.00011958615,0.00049021275,0.0011177552,0.00033504204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984737,0.00044478392,0.000077971796,0.00043223353,0.00047324432,0.00009804265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019598978,0.0006801413,0.0005079047,0.001592089,0.003422182,0.0074702078,0.0019238759,0.0042794477,0.11436872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038520922,0.00034371638,0.0007216584,0.0022986443,0.0039563375,0.0055402042,0.005159873,0.0051100384,0.041105293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041583494,0.000005789595,0.000018970466,0.000019849998,0.000001319002,0.00004375898,0.00035183452,0.000065555454,0.000047965375,0.96899676,0.021907058,0.008536999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004196043,0.0000048046386,0.000037724938,0.00013547532,0.00000310521,0.00009546654,0.00018616456,0.00014705244,0.00024884858,0.1688838,0.8302485,0.0000049161667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037701137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030287188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11436872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005093203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025377376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3826015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416681","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0006","title":"Implied Terms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Law and economics; Function (biology); Law; Business; Mathematical economics; Political science; Economics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.029001823932431545,"score_gpt":0.2966479332090232,"score_spread":0.26764610927659166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015132375,0.0012834831,0.022337947,0.002800407,0.00049693603,0.000064075204,0.00048105794,0.00012186422,0.970901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16329965,0.004072668,0.019241117,0.002503054,0.0016202944,0.00034258136,0.0016331475,0.0005044813,0.8067831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794954,0.00055906427,0.00014028852,0.00031240526,0.0008782239,0.0001605152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883705,0.00035215734,0.00007097988,0.00027796903,0.00041007117,0.00005176928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014436219,0.0008775289,0.00054503133,0.0017708594,0.0025883499,0.0054279296,0.001930328,0.002693521,0.14668982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004112776,0.00046635923,0.0005700225,0.0021103995,0.0035811854,0.009033429,0.0028929503,0.0051682484,0.032395076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000353688,0.0000027719225,0.0000072540442,0.000015220531,5.318331e-7,0.000009219585,0.00008037459,0.00004464642,0.00005666039,0.9913134,0.005673501,0.0027929638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007814877,0.000006294215,0.000048484882,0.0000886075,0.0000049601235,0.000080798935,0.00009470536,0.00036572147,0.00029663127,0.52708316,0.47191542,0.0000074419177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016970993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017744657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14668982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003283122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013626246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49072635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416716","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0012","title":"Unfair Contracts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Outcome (game theory); Law and economics; Game theory; Contract theory; Process (computing); Business; Law; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0281308234507107,"score_gpt":0.2927559964118993,"score_spread":0.2646251729611886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025958677,0.004358818,0.032483064,0.0059151696,0.0003998352,0.00005711048,0.000113286646,0.000042830834,0.954034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45172346,0.011896676,0.019665342,0.006756601,0.0014942879,0.00036473974,0.0003266506,0.00016740762,0.5076049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600416,0.0013790369,0.00013361553,0.0003987315,0.0017493097,0.00033515293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728036,0.0012727776,0.00017937353,0.0005561783,0.0005616813,0.00014947752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031689224,0.0007147633,0.0004976718,0.0013429545,0.0023857993,0.0058889524,0.0012039904,0.0043608644,0.027107714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006800622,0.0003100664,0.00039950947,0.0015124212,0.00864813,0.0054234858,0.0026609001,0.004462665,0.0044696974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010858104,0.000002473124,0.000006654961,0.000008035427,7.405205e-7,0.0000085737,0.000050946855,0.00016093047,0.000015417438,0.9956142,0.0024107168,0.0017202871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002910502,0.000004636956,0.00003102653,0.00007788942,0.000001841343,0.00005120081,0.000056996687,0.00067034125,0.0000569586,0.9061392,0.09290308,0.000003936178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002245423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016411702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027107714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00394441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028228438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090684354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416730","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0005","title":"Express Terms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Phrase; Business; Law; Term (time); Law and economics; Content (measure theory); Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03120542617085813,"score_gpt":0.2931913330319306,"score_spread":0.2619859068610725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000248002,0.0014770455,0.007550643,0.0021545747,0.0009006951,0.000058238635,0.0006684754,0.00022417786,0.98671824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013371859,0.0029608272,0.006172683,0.0019098578,0.00094944326,0.00019226629,0.001550285,0.00065251574,0.9722402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983308,0.00040935414,0.00013641891,0.00024416394,0.00071352406,0.00016590492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990114,0.00025383383,0.000057773686,0.00024916552,0.00036522333,0.00006261079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016166068,0.0009794426,0.00062803924,0.0022314664,0.0029832644,0.0092805745,0.0018424252,0.0028524897,0.19625258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035837304,0.000521866,0.0005816097,0.0028136203,0.003068184,0.009075062,0.003281866,0.0050472263,0.12563142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005714472,0.000006410583,0.000016899836,0.000044188037,0.000001422054,0.000021438644,0.00028975197,0.00005780082,0.000101205114,0.89771277,0.08942776,0.012314624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015899166,0.0000023042148,0.000019308212,0.00006348556,0.0000012686926,0.0000385304,0.000068514564,0.000056537807,0.00008188843,0.04552352,0.9541399,0.000003207936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033095886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036556635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19625258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051957034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023843935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65653026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416732","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0011","title":"Duress and Undue Influence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Plea; Undue influence; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Position (finance); Law; Intervention (counseling); Business; Set (abstract data type); Aside; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018229295167320733,"score_gpt":0.28333818492495755,"score_spread":0.2651088897576368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023334522,0.006779026,0.008141152,0.007159949,0.00025589767,0.000030056723,0.00008759163,0.000028817465,0.954183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94933575,0.0035209819,0.0008428284,0.0015329246,0.00047458633,0.000057539874,0.000057737045,0.00003722043,0.044140354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967403,0.0013971456,0.00015737252,0.0005329945,0.000762693,0.00040959887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990299,0.0063036373,0.0008207677,0.0014545231,0.0007086183,0.00041336732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041130884,0.00038935305,0.00044978253,0.0011533491,0.0020675322,0.0059861415,0.00076569716,0.0019715691,0.012017151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01238021,0.00024302446,0.00035359885,0.00084893533,0.021420242,0.0037840984,0.004042925,0.0037860975,0.0009132095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006162583,0.00000465142,0.00025716532,0.000013123907,0.0000048122665,0.00003918695,0.00067959115,0.00021997206,0.000038873764,0.99426067,0.00094507635,0.003530674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009070541,0.00001418393,0.0009501573,0.00015727356,0.000013385526,0.000102400394,0.00041828534,0.0002870644,0.00014990056,0.94732815,0.050557863,0.000012155993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023755943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022830975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012017151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003163133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018059812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040201426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416738","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0009","title":"The Duty to Disclose Material Facts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Duty; Nothing; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023875399601265685,"score_gpt":0.2925545599791847,"score_spread":0.26867916037791906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004217071,0.0028363422,0.012934058,0.016658172,0.0009787629,0.000093761315,0.00015252542,0.000051453106,0.96207786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23033305,0.006013993,0.0077826898,0.014094364,0.0016092146,0.00023597595,0.00024143103,0.00012036505,0.7395689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656063,0.0009837031,0.00021411032,0.00043172433,0.001504689,0.00030517788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956185,0.0023541711,0.0003086581,0.0008695565,0.0006753396,0.000173733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036520443,0.0004081289,0.00042267123,0.0007753892,0.002591529,0.0060810777,0.0012055029,0.0048234323,0.024589995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00882063,0.00048411434,0.000350245,0.000628317,0.009519581,0.008184065,0.0035259675,0.006121902,0.0066498257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040254554,0.000006775581,0.000048511436,0.000030034747,0.0000014135018,0.00006780814,0.0011603234,0.0000682728,0.00011608723,0.9726724,0.01826187,0.007562461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006915487,0.000018638742,0.00015444642,0.00032180038,0.000005504003,0.0003878031,0.0006575172,0.00021360774,0.00046578108,0.2795925,0.71816397,0.000011537541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016370198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019207917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024589995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017463404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032305769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08226168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417315","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0003","title":"Offer and Acceptance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.028169061606744986,"score_gpt":0.29059624437564324,"score_spread":0.26242718276889826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003667938,0.0022227117,0.009155558,0.008158963,0.00039976675,0.00007579916,0.000039414157,0.000026356816,0.97625357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45594886,0.006023019,0.01053993,0.0082150875,0.0011789894,0.00038001433,0.00017948356,0.00025086664,0.5172838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99033,0.0033701826,0.00039035844,0.00087534264,0.0041388795,0.0008952846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464804,0.002844316,0.00032423052,0.00053884217,0.0012583585,0.00038623533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006734567,0.0004450487,0.00056616025,0.0011039822,0.0036937548,0.008591629,0.0015322703,0.0054316553,0.05149045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013384787,0.00051579566,0.000685045,0.0010683043,0.015195697,0.009210519,0.0049403943,0.007734444,0.0072513623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051317384,0.000007926665,0.00004998505,0.000019500718,0.0000011380748,0.000032923766,0.00073551567,0.000042641725,0.000041211188,0.9918576,0.003235484,0.003970977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015249609,0.000036874695,0.0003930886,0.0002998072,0.000007472604,0.00032960158,0.0015503286,0.00028530575,0.00024041426,0.6334469,0.3633727,0.000022152593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031754754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027677868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05149045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038671421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048154276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17225271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417321","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0004","title":"Beyond Offer and Acceptance: Formalities, Intent to Create Legal Relations, and Consideration","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.022141240997826973,"score_gpt":0.2769733572471733,"score_spread":0.2548321162493463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014266669,0.002691507,0.1215743,0.0140867,0.00022734857,0.00010622769,0.000052191575,0.000120710174,0.84687436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8577041,0.0019233656,0.03584405,0.0018305398,0.0002863518,0.00031492722,0.00008072858,0.00019528522,0.10182063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151844,0.0049691913,0.00029012564,0.0006492364,0.0021330744,0.00043981135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99078476,0.0063471133,0.0004562597,0.0010167024,0.0010325926,0.0003625017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010305528,0.00040130122,0.00045138417,0.0012699451,0.003358841,0.01014822,0.0015699592,0.0029720326,0.010316944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011931616,0.0005408997,0.00065074896,0.001442256,0.030485636,0.013656938,0.004744119,0.0062699527,0.0012068455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.051868e-7,0.000002446509,0.000015109427,0.0000035165315,3.101004e-7,0.000005692238,0.00038944732,0.00005326498,0.000012326334,0.9983615,0.00025942587,0.000895924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044107414,0.0000057763973,0.000049201182,0.000044470635,0.0000021785418,0.000024943052,0.0002929964,0.0005527308,0.000077350014,0.9737239,0.025217278,0.0000047300728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042359796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004285965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010316944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053050946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004614723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054501474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417351","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0002","title":"Definition and Classification","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09341602189408273,"score_gpt":0.30116889132849894,"score_spread":0.20775286943441623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071348865,0.009422842,0.07294618,0.0076124547,0.0030292124,0.0005227402,0.0055010836,0.00039354851,0.89343715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2919326,0.018026652,0.17265347,0.005484974,0.004196287,0.00251181,0.03711555,0.00085057184,0.4672281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577504,0.0009318761,0.00050899165,0.00095766067,0.0013786252,0.0004477307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976972,0.0004589964,0.00020111178,0.00031356452,0.0010939797,0.00023521725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019095498,0.00083000475,0.0010661768,0.006339327,0.0035614918,0.010213589,0.0025058219,0.002030471,0.0315157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004822869,0.00029269367,0.0005824771,0.009452849,0.006474713,0.009887023,0.002985993,0.00323256,0.013088778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007908107,0.00000801165,0.00029584786,0.000102995655,0.0000033258277,0.00003984819,0.00057157304,0.00009591081,0.00011062916,0.9344456,0.037683684,0.026634596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035866103,0.000006428632,0.0002878187,0.00021459215,0.0000031222885,0.00014082373,0.0005486828,0.00031141556,0.0000811313,0.34771064,0.6506829,0.000008868332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002809194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018176984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0315157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004048562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002558912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105430484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417357","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Character (mathematics); Public law; Political science; Politics; Commercial law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02062464147757349,"score_gpt":0.2769725278647792,"score_spread":0.25634788638720574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068046444,0.0038258554,0.0038752605,0.007881945,0.0036694005,0.00009558041,0.0026148455,0.00058854587,0.97676814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008207207,0.0035988062,0.0023214663,0.0028763996,0.0014479784,0.000102937505,0.0029056047,0.00038410153,0.97815543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989839,0.00013863643,0.000047695015,0.0002649853,0.0004501139,0.000114543334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988071,0.00017117884,0.000059530896,0.0001687894,0.0005681164,0.00022531053],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086543785,0.00086547615,0.0005254576,0.0014967574,0.001969058,0.006674853,0.0017866862,0.00252458,0.4898428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028629112,0.00033919167,0.0004935389,0.001726496,0.0011593649,0.004615328,0.0028119711,0.0026561401,0.3005078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002693348,0.000044045693,0.0002317883,0.00018220532,0.0000030858646,0.000074403884,0.0004974357,0.00015015627,0.0002323633,0.17765701,0.71302444,0.10787617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014785121,0.0000045620277,0.00009252628,0.00007282293,7.647113e-7,0.00003336548,0.000063488944,0.000018814982,0.000034092704,0.0073236907,0.99235183,0.0000025085158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003827173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031433546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5101572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026896566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022992983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72767735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388439435","doi":"10.7202/1092513ar","title":"Les clauses d’assurance et la renonciationà la subrogation : la vision distinctedes tribunaux québécois","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028931950136140413,"score_gpt":0.35008758465190914,"score_spread":0.32115563451576873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388439435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12138538,0.06353013,0.011361055,0.3041837,0.003108842,0.00019341597,0.0009735286,0.0001305701,0.49513337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81336427,0.012900765,0.006905296,0.019411858,0.00042951727,0.000095631556,0.00033279142,0.00006771128,0.14649215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948349,0.0007906452,0.00014806465,0.00039565095,0.0023684197,0.0014622473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402654,0.0010023363,0.00037121054,0.00023840404,0.003377046,0.0009843513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004271308,0.00060972,0.0005150526,0.0021479004,0.011502248,0.01218881,0.002175494,0.004992317,0.008079146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00795005,0.00036070263,0.00054042455,0.00241059,0.018390337,0.0041780123,0.0028348782,0.008867507,0.00038785159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005739278,0.000037641294,0.005636403,0.00015933577,0.000020512209,0.0004063719,0.023041982,0.00047746763,0.0008166885,0.84279996,0.05692389,0.06962228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034729575,0.000059948463,0.033796947,0.001132872,0.000047795358,0.0004239168,0.03101112,0.0010292296,0.000735459,0.079612754,0.8519211,0.0001942647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9681466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97949445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06652695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06652695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.102777556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48268908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388547292","doi":"10.1515/9781805390879-004","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Berghahn Books","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07772392307382392,"score_gpt":0.32845487895499975,"score_spread":0.25073095588117583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388547292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064806496,0.0054838876,0.022448659,0.1293056,0.056603316,0.0014226679,0.0462284,0.0041079586,0.72791886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023888012,0.002624858,0.014511328,0.021024061,0.004930525,0.0009306192,0.018683564,0.0025905084,0.9108166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950336,0.0011696228,0.00019692589,0.0005435862,0.0028087709,0.0002475928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751711,0.002840556,0.00064060674,0.0014628868,0.017026149,0.0028587028],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040416345,0.00079166767,0.0007834757,0.0026078322,0.0023711661,0.0033453812,0.0020607256,0.0010312141,0.3459463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027571108,0.00028308362,0.00040653316,0.001978001,0.0008083347,0.002598296,0.0031034108,0.0026587055,0.2219931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002276188,0.000012145888,0.00030133076,0.00007764496,0.0000025128813,0.00008629319,0.00052186754,0.000055480665,0.00015669416,0.007907375,0.9677118,0.023144122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046406994,0.000004358316,0.00033949784,0.0000924629,0.000002337292,0.000104096034,0.00057666464,0.0000489633,0.00007432005,0.0019321973,0.996815,0.000005487362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007115811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009791774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6540537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034991747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004214885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9329282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388682225","doi":"10.1017/9781839703492.002","title":"Analysis of Core Problems in the Classification of Compensation Funds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Framing (construction); Core (optical fiber); Business; Computer science; Actuarial science; Psychology; Engineering; Telecommunications; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13692394437111452,"score_gpt":0.376541666746218,"score_spread":0.23961772237510345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388682225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079850435,0.017304312,0.3081469,0.04783143,0.001206773,0.0006730311,0.0016415683,0.00027993327,0.5430656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7762167,0.01003749,0.13889691,0.004382118,0.0024919016,0.001533102,0.0017574452,0.0003483698,0.064335935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98672116,0.0051824856,0.0009818529,0.0013976315,0.004393064,0.0013237286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97838235,0.013263276,0.0019255055,0.0017455501,0.004370275,0.0003129957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0116992425,0.0007456132,0.0013722283,0.008296846,0.0046846275,0.015749626,0.0030311532,0.004491349,0.015307166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0372337,0.0006937406,0.001316564,0.009750643,0.012539198,0.01903669,0.0041447715,0.0069106775,0.0016829298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005676783,0.000004737416,0.00023219486,0.000021385273,0.0000016812464,0.000011033683,0.00032829584,0.00018690916,0.000018682314,0.99257255,0.0014404478,0.005176424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006339612,0.000009335802,0.0007458513,0.00026388702,0.00000755384,0.000072456416,0.0008495353,0.002333837,0.0001832893,0.955188,0.040322755,0.00001724015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005922728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002203608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015749626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103147095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00439232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07483876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388714748","doi":"10.1017/9781108995825.004","title":"The Consent Illusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Moral hazard; Incentive; Inequality; Business; Service (business); Hazard; Illusion; Informed consent; Work (physics); Internet privacy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics; Computer science; Marketing; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.06301643130928462,"score_gpt":0.26267491253543535,"score_spread":0.1996584812261507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388714748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052341297,0.011346322,0.07782807,0.12540467,0.0020235532,0.00013936589,0.00027860515,0.00019741863,0.7775479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5610718,0.01613546,0.041458122,0.09074072,0.0041832877,0.0012006755,0.00044189487,0.00061998784,0.28414804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98851633,0.005406955,0.00047303786,0.0015425074,0.0032306362,0.0008305775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891722,0.0077542616,0.0003457835,0.00154875,0.00094095134,0.00023797806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013100552,0.0008028926,0.0007232426,0.00121727,0.005155699,0.008865701,0.0016713412,0.008552522,0.012807871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022140807,0.0005786273,0.0010921037,0.0015284634,0.033679444,0.019772941,0.005360402,0.01384684,0.0036739453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021397088,0.0000019031237,0.000018941346,0.000010016165,7.275398e-7,0.000014329539,0.00021787337,0.000039275725,0.0000128823685,0.99363774,0.004170629,0.0018734765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054862535,0.0000048602083,0.000034505854,0.0000808532,0.0000026592302,0.000082997125,0.00014480077,0.00027304384,0.00010478281,0.9217205,0.077538215,0.000007368128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004432517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022491736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013100552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064431704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058769556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06928313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389124416","doi":"10.32920/24665610.v1","title":"Decomposing Bhasin v Hrynew : Towards an institutional understanding of the general organizing principle of good faith in contractual performance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Faith; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Good faith; Subject (documents); Fair dealing; Law and economics; Function (biology); Common law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13695317578894114,"score_gpt":0.3741164050743454,"score_spread":0.23716322928540426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389124416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05602719,0.0037263345,0.03091359,0.04497491,0.00033045717,0.00025457758,0.00018256516,0.00007616707,0.86351424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9190705,0.0023729461,0.008939113,0.007568543,0.000107356784,0.00013260765,0.00012575206,0.00005142882,0.061631832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951041,0.0007852373,0.000109198474,0.0006321834,0.0016634408,0.0017057535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973672,0.0007697733,0.00029223165,0.00029851848,0.00074652873,0.00052573514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038856098,0.00041955672,0.0003443371,0.0021154508,0.00927545,0.010817132,0.002440548,0.003862776,0.004400169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063313665,0.00041322943,0.00044303428,0.0018989181,0.02855795,0.006374177,0.005298255,0.0060576624,0.00043326025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025404736,0.000002764233,0.00024934378,0.000007342024,9.3518537e-7,0.000055041823,0.0025412093,0.00015661499,0.00004694262,0.9929636,0.0013968025,0.0025769551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024834173,0.000029302382,0.005732102,0.00031177266,0.000022402706,0.00015960468,0.011289127,0.0034872887,0.00064735516,0.7511218,0.22705536,0.000119094024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8595317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88976383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8595317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054158363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07368953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39294827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389124568","doi":"10.32920/24665610","title":"Decomposing Bhasin v Hrynew : Towards an institutional understanding of the general organizing principle of good faith in contractual performance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Faith; Supreme court; Political science; Good faith; Subject (documents); Fair dealing; Function (biology); Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13695317578894114,"score_gpt":0.3741164050743454,"score_spread":0.23716322928540426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389124568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05602719,0.0037263345,0.03091359,0.04497491,0.00033045717,0.00025457758,0.00018256516,0.00007616707,0.86351424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9190705,0.0023729461,0.008939113,0.007568543,0.000107356784,0.00013260765,0.00012575206,0.00005142882,0.061631832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951041,0.0007852373,0.000109198474,0.0006321834,0.0016634408,0.0017057535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973672,0.0007697733,0.00029223165,0.00029851848,0.00074652873,0.00052573514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038856098,0.00041955672,0.0003443371,0.0021154508,0.00927545,0.010817132,0.002440548,0.003862776,0.004400169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063313665,0.00041322943,0.00044303428,0.0018989181,0.02855795,0.006374177,0.005298255,0.0060576624,0.00043326025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025404736,0.000002764233,0.00024934378,0.000007342024,9.3518537e-7,0.000055041823,0.0025412093,0.00015661499,0.00004694262,0.9929636,0.0013968025,0.0025769551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024834173,0.000029302382,0.005732102,0.00031177266,0.000022402706,0.00015960468,0.011289127,0.0034872887,0.00064735516,0.7511218,0.22705536,0.000119094024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8595317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88976383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8595317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054158363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07368953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39294827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389125712","doi":"10.18066/inic0153.23","title":"HOLDING FAMILIAR COMO ESPÉCIE DO GÊNERO HOLDING PATRIMONIAL","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09515697557218308,"score_gpt":0.3739652274783799,"score_spread":0.27880825190619685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389125712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097316235,0.0017214636,0.013518832,0.028557401,0.0010944364,0.00011916971,0.00031712587,0.00014183937,0.85721356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.831431,0.0004328247,0.003604799,0.0048941784,0.0006892642,0.00008808046,0.000103130784,0.000044815468,0.15871187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941392,0.0012698575,0.00026814276,0.001136321,0.0014290264,0.0017574242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512595,0.001422661,0.00064857124,0.001288144,0.00079008384,0.0007246712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005211884,0.00026795373,0.0008347422,0.0014161956,0.0089890305,0.00776407,0.0017824406,0.0055297157,0.023648227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011296944,0.0004484575,0.00047366667,0.001766834,0.0151202865,0.0066076824,0.0061572157,0.0061065326,0.0022418918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013467753,0.000017964241,0.0011201882,0.000022506434,0.000007506277,0.00017512533,0.0038109394,0.000024508001,0.00019641613,0.9793578,0.0069986996,0.00825491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048149133,0.00015505216,0.010898369,0.00031199004,0.00008837387,0.0017572971,0.018237846,0.00067795406,0.0012704713,0.564261,0.4021897,0.00010381247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011714912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033865504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023648227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033022624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004808372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07911122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389471831","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary transfer of ownership: One or more ownerships?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.3892765404723455,"score_gpt":0.5765413109259243,"score_spread":0.1872647704535788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389471831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13154393,0.0055678687,0.08456473,0.081170864,0.0013791965,0.000097234246,0.00020433673,0.00019869828,0.6952732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96028006,0.00069071277,0.0038763697,0.0038452137,0.0003684873,0.00007340105,0.000033070628,0.00005218412,0.030780548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926481,0.0022335208,0.00032595787,0.0014363705,0.0015597641,0.0017962075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931693,0.0019701242,0.0008263983,0.002303806,0.0010575824,0.000672774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070935097,0.00032509599,0.0006220559,0.0009448869,0.004728044,0.0077724895,0.0017071416,0.004360144,0.0074487175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013546299,0.00034098543,0.00069284963,0.001136255,0.03679598,0.0171196,0.005744573,0.0059092254,0.0008337883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047983353,0.0000046007162,0.00022105193,0.000007516342,0.0000014281102,0.000041510433,0.0019638317,0.000019853032,0.000036393776,0.99334514,0.001215533,0.0031382032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024848583,0.000059109923,0.0017862568,0.00029391766,0.00001466388,0.00058731565,0.0041999444,0.00073100976,0.00052257767,0.83035606,0.16137367,0.00005060962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011511681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070696506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011511681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075777723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004630195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054980874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389583348","doi":"10.5040/9781509967032","title":"Landmark Cases in the Law of Punitive Damages","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Jurisdiction; Damages; Tort; Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.08988678505488328,"score_gpt":0.3311686293048536,"score_spread":0.2412818442499703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389583348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018929817,0.027311917,0.0049035577,0.07940265,0.0037824928,0.000037895512,0.00009241421,0.0001505514,0.86538875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6991544,0.014361126,0.0029428685,0.033455636,0.00479553,0.00009733111,0.000075877855,0.0001349395,0.24498227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959785,0.0014900622,0.00011732583,0.00048667827,0.0013319728,0.0005954446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954782,0.0035822159,0.00022578191,0.00023316148,0.00036118782,0.00011940109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022668508,0.00025734212,0.0002333509,0.0009089204,0.0055111214,0.007923505,0.0008233238,0.005480701,0.0036339094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057826745,0.00035235952,0.00033645975,0.0013969817,0.015360097,0.0047865617,0.0019730728,0.0078087486,0.00071148894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047569447,0.000006555493,0.00006586415,0.000022646656,0.0000014932617,0.00012764875,0.002405425,0.00011920875,0.000053985583,0.93356705,0.0577714,0.0058539356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009533292,0.000023740213,0.0007229268,0.0002626535,0.000006528372,0.00022900378,0.0017641344,0.00020437228,0.00032372167,0.14876592,0.84766257,0.00002483276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013960003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02200781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013960003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006514989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032631967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047269702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389742978","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192874146.003.0017","title":"Challenges for Canadian Unjust Enrichment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Injustice; Liability; Supreme court; Restitution; Law; Political science; Plaintiff; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1512601093629356,"score_gpt":0.3435202673635618,"score_spread":0.19226015800062618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389742978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005491385,0.014917738,0.002272579,0.33391315,0.0021368528,0.00006260177,0.00026181916,0.00012450074,0.64081943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37066048,0.024858212,0.00817671,0.15552044,0.0012822372,0.00013677013,0.00038728135,0.00021985918,0.438758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909183,0.0010120299,0.00013995684,0.00072069414,0.0049079577,0.0023011076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430275,0.0010452389,0.00009856507,0.0002268622,0.0035130538,0.000813504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005329368,0.0006393169,0.00072858384,0.0033209329,0.024110528,0.015626088,0.0030301418,0.009695776,0.016553262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007713744,0.00045357077,0.0006997225,0.0035404272,0.021731105,0.0044104354,0.004833477,0.010090024,0.0014452863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043348055,0.000009344785,0.00014901678,0.000046019548,0.0000024268263,0.00008665015,0.0018321048,0.0002125215,0.00006588244,0.8781869,0.1078982,0.011506589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063151956,0.0000054580332,0.0005593796,0.00022588784,0.000009371928,0.000046052046,0.0032682572,0.00033414378,0.00013723465,0.10550593,0.88986266,0.000039317038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98360795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16114143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16114143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29801813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390033730","doi":"10.7202/1106941ar","title":"Quelques points de comparaison entre les deuxplus anciens régimes intégrés d’indemnisationdes victimes d’accidents d’automobile : Québec et Nouvelle-Zélande","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050342645800383556,"score_gpt":0.3467241796945381,"score_spread":0.29638153389415456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390033730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81821233,0.0072690034,0.0021155044,0.012739079,0.0001168576,0.00011437716,0.0019412754,0.000037952042,0.15745361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819672,0.0009540738,0.0005194605,0.00057146815,0.000010840113,0.000031173277,0.00036199813,0.000008686013,0.015574997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985129,0.00020341744,0.000047076253,0.00017312285,0.00037783838,0.000685746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770796,0.00035469825,0.0003244142,0.00010022624,0.0011365177,0.0003760763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011168363,0.0001903358,0.0003572207,0.0023893407,0.0037197622,0.002583756,0.00084857264,0.00071318954,0.0068099177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002894834,0.0001572084,0.00028644197,0.0030000985,0.003271687,0.001098097,0.00094008,0.0011960246,0.00021898244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034603587,0.0001364814,0.53845435,0.00041671123,0.00036174577,0.0006387437,0.056485992,0.0019331665,0.0022978913,0.27641606,0.02034914,0.102163665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020292871,0.000037816782,0.9377462,0.00021258931,0.000048159294,0.000063663945,0.020186778,0.000405103,0.0002950362,0.0021656982,0.038775954,0.000042623822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98342794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99537045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037893157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037893157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022224147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27493542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390622066","doi":"10.54648/erpl2023035","title":"Ownership without Owner in the Czech Trust (Sketch on Margo Trust in the Czech Law)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Legislator; Law; Settlor; Civil code; Business; Legislation; Trust law; Fiduciary; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Duty; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04609732989218015,"score_gpt":0.3277203054792472,"score_spread":0.28162297558706706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390622066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012667048,0.023705816,0.014315292,0.045791708,0.003541532,0.0002096455,0.0004197721,0.00013611744,0.89921314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55823547,0.014599484,0.007033704,0.032226585,0.0014464867,0.00033753115,0.00023497005,0.00021789345,0.3856679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973091,0.00049863016,0.00016648603,0.000560856,0.0008436675,0.00062135834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994924,0.00016381661,0.00005847716,0.00006844984,0.00014762102,0.00006922686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023235858,0.00033359346,0.00024569302,0.0010486022,0.0041754935,0.0088278195,0.0008535034,0.004457751,0.0099658035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003691366,0.00044923747,0.0007156746,0.001062481,0.010482392,0.010050988,0.0042416477,0.005967322,0.0034182617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036477538,0.0000045746715,0.00011825741,0.000023128287,0.000001589633,0.00007219891,0.00075372175,0.0000678131,0.000070602466,0.97948587,0.015880052,0.0035185532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010195523,0.000017538301,0.0017537817,0.0002850109,0.000010106634,0.00040910736,0.0009703581,0.00032121834,0.00020794531,0.15214284,0.84381354,0.00005832908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0825293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07033859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0825293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010382737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006957886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16409785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390907656","doi":"10.1515/9781771103435-001","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Villanova University","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.11961491560033279,"score_gpt":0.35575268940746674,"score_spread":0.23613777380713397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390907656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020344642,0.0111395605,0.025793899,0.15235525,0.24526562,0.0013592162,0.055606686,0.0068219975,0.49962336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00900198,0.0034696835,0.009649649,0.0224324,0.013860751,0.0010215692,0.023312734,0.0037416872,0.9135095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388593,0.0012749416,0.00046796817,0.00077848264,0.0033339742,0.00025869274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96154916,0.0055188136,0.0012796967,0.0022891911,0.025740756,0.0036223663],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004810467,0.0010516149,0.0011778908,0.002902044,0.0017296523,0.0030771128,0.0023563146,0.0013343698,0.43466064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04446086,0.0003613316,0.0005525735,0.0021360444,0.0008401037,0.0024574134,0.0036918584,0.0034154158,0.35758498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025445463,0.000007987452,0.000091624235,0.00016031388,0.000002670918,0.00006738832,0.00020042981,0.00003214271,0.0002648968,0.004158616,0.9762481,0.018740367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044659423,0.0000034991892,0.00013337389,0.00008166795,0.0000019487775,0.000067646826,0.000121862686,0.00002583148,0.000064619264,0.0011645281,0.99832636,0.000004088369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033064128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042443355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5653393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002364751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039386083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80638796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390939528","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0020","title":"Subsidiary and the structure of property law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Public property; Law and economics; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Law; Private law; Private property; Political science; Common law; Property rights; Public law; Business; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.009040956041293341,"score_gpt":0.23063285207405976,"score_spread":0.2215918960327664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390939528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060238816,0.0034977533,0.14264894,0.012313582,0.00028269118,0.000205723,0.000089552974,0.00016920442,0.78055376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573868,0.0011779757,0.014942335,0.0009337584,0.00034353818,0.00018053873,0.000067393456,0.000052332234,0.02491533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957468,0.0015696286,0.00018692875,0.00078837527,0.0010912368,0.0006169941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951782,0.002481675,0.00054451724,0.00090954365,0.00058535894,0.00030072645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003814423,0.0002599645,0.0005315745,0.0021115257,0.0039382456,0.0072021126,0.0011794796,0.002568193,0.006757709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070766867,0.0003915426,0.0005694572,0.0012186407,0.031867705,0.0099435095,0.004201677,0.0039239153,0.0009207179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.953635e-7,0.0000016218734,0.000030566654,0.000002166747,3.1758387e-7,0.0000066351163,0.000139149,0.00004661534,0.000015968526,0.99907494,0.00011774829,0.0005634003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011514542,0.00001103717,0.00016195199,0.000025304675,0.000002289175,0.00003302896,0.0001348635,0.000568444,0.000070342394,0.9787998,0.020176806,0.0000045827246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031073226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020583959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072021126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006294822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004524075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045672297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390957837","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0124","title":"Time for a pluralist approach? Judicial review of non-state decision makers in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Private law; Jurisdiction; Public law; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Administrative law; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.010678757702769924,"score_gpt":0.2579974893549134,"score_spread":0.24731873165214346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390957837","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25894836,0.023011588,0.0075753746,0.4720552,0.0015519344,0.0004112093,0.00032993106,0.000119956334,0.23599645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96356314,0.0036981928,0.003243486,0.014642769,0.00023363646,0.00007192321,0.00006420439,0.000039967512,0.014442698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96919245,0.0061993883,0.0014312693,0.0029910032,0.011468378,0.0087174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353208,0.025859423,0.0034417515,0.002063793,0.023482474,0.009831773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02374106,0.00027995728,0.0009805771,0.0026675467,0.029363425,0.0205683,0.00416609,0.0058989627,0.0036534115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07743126,0.0007491326,0.00048856146,0.004295662,0.01565668,0.0048203017,0.0058068912,0.007429129,0.00026946375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013153342,0.00010453907,0.017375533,0.00044133395,0.00012097544,0.0013250686,0.054623935,0.0033351528,0.0010141908,0.7299676,0.08878791,0.1027723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023481254,0.00013224263,0.06360018,0.0019560966,0.0002635432,0.0005044493,0.07800992,0.011966884,0.002693422,0.22024897,0.6197468,0.0006426489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9744391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98937315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1655861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1655861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4015185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96780187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391213619","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4676558","title":"The Nominalism of the New Nominate Torts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"NOMINATE; Nominalism; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.007926539044609387,"score_gpt":0.28855345660282444,"score_spread":0.28062691755821506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391213619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048542026,0.0028528003,0.029524866,0.1572104,0.0013793893,0.000055680324,0.00026776662,0.00007404757,0.7600931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452861,0.0005991965,0.0044230213,0.013194348,0.001649598,0.00011487962,0.00004447526,0.000049244652,0.034639213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98553234,0.0065035014,0.00052461575,0.0023356485,0.00404823,0.001055689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98732066,0.0073685683,0.0010555681,0.0017853674,0.0018752737,0.0005946326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014638592,0.00035454516,0.0010000884,0.0012751282,0.007028289,0.009768107,0.0016938774,0.008796445,0.009328365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033672262,0.0005248672,0.0006388303,0.00077916816,0.028132798,0.011204795,0.003966861,0.012336164,0.0010860437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006788645,0.0000040128284,0.00006846579,0.0000040875593,0.0000014586712,0.000010148589,0.00033745682,0.000038490052,0.000020770854,0.99702126,0.0016516157,0.0008353617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021099106,0.0000114501045,0.00046783974,0.000040843952,0.0000068599834,0.000074105425,0.0004960816,0.000537387,0.00008564286,0.9617102,0.036530267,0.00001829451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006154476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007041543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014638592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005733002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031574636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077417195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391688578","doi":"10.51644/9781554581146-001","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09169232728360258,"score_gpt":0.36970915970327906,"score_spread":0.27801683241967645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391688578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034955211,0.009742557,0.04493848,0.106454656,0.17434812,0.0022229098,0.13852312,0.009006487,0.51126814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023812257,0.0045872973,0.028987383,0.026019031,0.012744734,0.002635228,0.09863454,0.0067221317,0.79585737],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929959,0.0012894672,0.0006219997,0.001166478,0.00346192,0.00046406104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665415,0.004856158,0.0011835719,0.0031722044,0.01986021,0.004386309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062445514,0.0011576158,0.0015658112,0.0027466973,0.0019081916,0.0036853957,0.002810641,0.0017295328,0.55059063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04531884,0.00041710836,0.0009762425,0.0025095614,0.0008972808,0.002448315,0.00470818,0.0030199199,0.40662426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010285613,0.000018651277,0.0003913064,0.00041015522,0.00001097873,0.00018728286,0.00029192847,0.000097502845,0.0007611514,0.009024237,0.9483852,0.040318906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017265322,0.000010659624,0.0003511663,0.00016678942,0.000007592342,0.00015270976,0.00020104548,0.00008039353,0.0001958567,0.0032103425,0.9955978,0.0000083533205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032197654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039073634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44940937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025278965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050242096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6410279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391964660","doi":"10.51644/9781771120999","title":"Literary Land Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literature; History; Art","score_opus":0.046883397183723946,"score_gpt":0.33474638992002603,"score_spread":0.2878629927363021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391964660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067228805,0.0017086265,0.00052341097,0.0057628024,0.0006735195,0.000020944493,0.00020244373,0.000057530193,0.9843277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3780441,0.0027948683,0.0007103087,0.0035044001,0.0012742428,0.00006161568,0.0007884735,0.00026177664,0.61256015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971131,0.00051577244,0.00012035027,0.00040330138,0.0012930542,0.0005545013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654835,0.0008381156,0.00017067451,0.00062086066,0.0014926519,0.00032928787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014681617,0.0004669845,0.00035853166,0.002739567,0.012574714,0.012854263,0.0015215506,0.0030230698,0.05196625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006637628,0.00021818755,0.00029002974,0.0028188063,0.011363466,0.0049650664,0.0053077373,0.0025833272,0.00973666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023277229,0.000016693302,0.0006300506,0.00008291117,0.0000056647555,0.00040943222,0.02252686,0.000058580816,0.00023283035,0.8060789,0.13906166,0.030873066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031698792,0.000004279143,0.0004984766,0.00013309118,0.0000033851227,0.00014488355,0.0065189437,0.00003718584,0.00017160286,0.014559976,0.9779196,0.0000054159304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052884206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09574443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052884206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011719562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006363251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1738444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392204234","doi":"10.1017/9781009382229.012","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392204234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392733097","doi":"10.1017/9781108874144.025","title":"Subject Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Subject (documents); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.029996437553250176,"score_gpt":0.24683891344977094,"score_spread":0.21684247589652075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392733097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005714214,0.011060457,0.002083135,0.005047971,0.012859435,0.0005627778,0.030144712,0.0019726348,0.93569744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001430333,0.0077652284,0.00080675783,0.00087059784,0.0033787114,0.00022970371,0.016868219,0.00066139724,0.9679891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934167,0.000052655116,0.000069618,0.00009738559,0.0003803833,0.00005837084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755484,0.00022902121,0.00013108607,0.00015399177,0.0015348559,0.00039628567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005573005,0.0009329768,0.0010718906,0.0074220714,0.0012659886,0.005052495,0.0011368949,0.00080794346,0.6803272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035913836,0.00040460046,0.00039044695,0.00786192,0.00041919333,0.0028764189,0.0014401973,0.001238716,0.59790003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008539165,0.000014493257,0.000058123835,0.00028142508,0.0000010472121,0.000018609695,0.00003228824,0.000046322464,0.0001474682,0.002077113,0.93116224,0.066152215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012288948,0.0000051867196,0.00017630422,0.00013274717,9.394959e-7,0.000019349822,0.000019442754,0.000012812292,0.000033664815,0.0006104285,0.9989856,0.0000024072092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040314766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004878579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31967282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018170738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021703795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45597446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392770028","doi":"10.1017/9781009414890.013","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392770028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392770221","doi":"10.1017/9781009175166.020","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392770221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392784625","doi":"10.1017/9781009099103.016","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392784625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392788288","doi":"10.1017/9781009099080.021","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"it","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03050789898583455,"score_gpt":0.2649620464377461,"score_spread":0.23445414745191157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392788288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085012324,0.010311272,0.0028906008,0.010925161,0.016885377,0.0012740477,0.16910598,0.003574474,0.784183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026412192,0.010570631,0.0015906579,0.0019809701,0.005019257,0.00060276216,0.07565411,0.0009778637,0.90096253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985927,0.00010801437,0.00019742832,0.00016314443,0.0008301934,0.00010858687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927045,0.0007809006,0.0004426382,0.00049820315,0.004886681,0.0006871185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010001551,0.0010621647,0.0010342682,0.008736976,0.0013806984,0.005748093,0.0013739119,0.0008729708,0.724205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010698985,0.00043487045,0.00057717867,0.010489027,0.00037665188,0.0033723004,0.0016424231,0.0012833923,0.63387704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016609421,0.000010057824,0.00008484982,0.00035220946,0.0000018352011,0.000015210094,0.00002255366,0.000053320684,0.00008598356,0.0012225163,0.95079345,0.047341388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030376927,0.000009484895,0.00035986613,0.00020593475,0.0000020934256,0.000014758132,0.000027246988,0.000014296614,0.00005123257,0.0006352066,0.9986726,0.000004222276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078031495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006356007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27579498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022256994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032115104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393109393","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttae018","title":"Saskatchewan law as a solution to the problem of informal wills in European countries?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Legislation; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Medicine","score_opus":0.012254846817925689,"score_gpt":0.2959057137654629,"score_spread":0.28365086694753716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393109393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07176625,0.0036616062,0.006336482,0.15802452,0.0012429068,0.00015183087,0.00018536297,0.000087750115,0.7585434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83636075,0.0019472095,0.0056242966,0.040750884,0.00015673642,0.00015989288,0.00013761836,0.00003764775,0.11482499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933822,0.002204008,0.00035479644,0.00064217154,0.0010434653,0.0023732758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425924,0.001391255,0.00038743706,0.00075754634,0.0022582642,0.00094618194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077103535,0.00037367697,0.00043632605,0.0016190376,0.008725821,0.013259613,0.0018032008,0.005722241,0.0070817405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012721473,0.00047095367,0.0005745523,0.0022923073,0.011673118,0.0044773915,0.0060730563,0.00594828,0.00066668075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100725,0.000008688222,0.00060018443,0.000015568874,0.0000059289678,0.0001619056,0.0012389671,0.00023522036,0.00009706811,0.9861855,0.006505742,0.0049352054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009655229,0.0000355277,0.006410508,0.0006610856,0.000038133112,0.00034753076,0.012804054,0.0014795094,0.0008348007,0.30371934,0.67343724,0.00013567889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78227246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8620831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21772754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0418316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07934246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4380195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393376789","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4779577","title":"The Colour of Jus Cogens","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.011222144337731327,"score_gpt":0.31570357668879306,"score_spread":0.30448143235106173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393376789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013320462,0.03576199,0.0028358377,0.3755689,0.11360174,0.000018872834,0.00021012493,0.0003071677,0.47036326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.092140585,0.011448854,0.0032173826,0.17314236,0.042116582,0.00008558365,0.0001212213,0.0007939818,0.67693347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725515,0.0011987054,0.00008068641,0.0004719598,0.00077358296,0.0002198983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962379,0.0019230427,0.00015504286,0.00039736344,0.0008511636,0.00043541766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025720065,0.0011138858,0.0011090687,0.0017413849,0.004869515,0.007625741,0.00091223116,0.005732787,0.032397766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015208277,0.00038029853,0.00037767572,0.0010010016,0.009058996,0.0066169132,0.0033154674,0.012095233,0.012082745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037268484,0.0000112893385,0.00005912889,0.00004572305,0.0000047983167,0.000048018253,0.00050654693,0.00007157333,0.00006637562,0.39744315,0.59318626,0.008519922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009211421,0.000008485983,0.000098226206,0.00010621403,0.0000021992385,0.000049985458,0.00031246248,0.00014024119,0.00005272794,0.0644034,0.9348031,0.000013695898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007912388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010238435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032397766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033124306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024706773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10838133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394543627","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.19221720","title":"Anscombe Quarter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0605201179149917,"score_gpt":0.34850613299527994,"score_spread":0.28798601508028826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394543627","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001843123,0.000089037465,0.00008904248,0.00012042312,0.000050543586,0.000016621441,0.9970784,0.00060206914,0.0017696352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006062439,0.000082352664,0.00035746733,0.000121088786,0.000012209012,0.000078990044,0.99685717,0.00023340098,0.0016510289],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983261,0.0003342763,0.00015303904,0.00045985746,0.00041188663,0.00031485388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950374,0.0015353294,0.00030960116,0.0014566571,0.00110163,0.0005594696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013688151,0.0025443342,0.0013571907,0.005282276,0.001453955,0.0038472593,0.0029841664,0.0030673177,0.1738453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012440728,0.00088938186,0.0024677892,0.006669933,0.0008453505,0.0020412917,0.0029455996,0.0026940948,0.20400165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039345556,0.000015513097,0.00043465773,0.0002995158,0.000015527203,0.000011255073,0.00001568625,0.00017731194,0.000034824374,0.00044820536,0.9969415,0.0015666627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021258916,0.000019210765,0.0022641679,0.00031784718,0.000026550884,0.00005253387,0.00009821098,0.00057644484,0.00021709617,0.0021672351,0.9940242,0.000023921004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034957215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07039212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1738453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016348844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034108981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5815705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394600739","doi":"10.1007/s10982-024-09495-3","title":"Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Metaphysics; Property (philosophy); Law; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03936656480920422,"score_gpt":0.30341619074576226,"score_spread":0.26404962593655806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394600739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057646554,0.009711246,0.068340965,0.31393942,0.0011131444,0.00007881502,0.00020186318,0.00014427837,0.54882365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767992,0.0018566252,0.0055014077,0.008321801,0.0011532727,0.00008909799,0.000051659877,0.00008918206,0.0061377822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845957,0.008803417,0.00065805705,0.0016747217,0.0027831318,0.0014848742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674847,0.022903483,0.0019518086,0.0036893396,0.0029192124,0.0010515073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02115575,0.00046471824,0.0013075025,0.0028738366,0.0079515055,0.012423499,0.0025448485,0.011305154,0.009792689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03424703,0.0007988887,0.0013224183,0.002333478,0.07625038,0.037657145,0.007553098,0.011179117,0.0010451449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025302102,0.0000026777766,0.000024512918,0.00000906116,0.0000016483967,0.000020180802,0.00028452367,0.00005146914,0.000012814712,0.99880564,0.00040026277,0.00038482362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050909143,0.0000013319041,0.000030472516,0.000020347836,0.0000016350187,0.000012841116,0.00017936579,0.00015664344,0.000016476766,0.99653095,0.00304216,0.000002730542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007591012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034441282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02115575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00849119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004279576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11188358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394706363","doi":"10.1017/9781009416665.010","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394706363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394730773","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4754688","title":"Aboriginal Title and Equity's Darling","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01565876056863776,"score_gpt":0.3800478968045971,"score_spread":0.36438913623595937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394730773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031635713,0.002762573,0.0020677145,0.015901837,0.0009796764,0.000039346356,0.00013529562,0.000031525,0.9464463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77945673,0.0014708557,0.0013978713,0.006061604,0.001024231,0.000088672394,0.0000502103,0.00006337626,0.21038643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966403,0.0010177145,0.00015576379,0.00057967915,0.0007482354,0.00085826527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931062,0.0035296578,0.00049212715,0.0008197986,0.0013129688,0.0007392969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00503248,0.00024715767,0.0007293733,0.0013797074,0.008411745,0.008719364,0.0011833361,0.004304631,0.019200249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015033199,0.00038578673,0.00032936333,0.001284524,0.0091208145,0.0039306344,0.0039675976,0.00615625,0.0013939893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008966566,0.0000058314854,0.00031533054,0.000013248377,0.000002489534,0.000051191866,0.002620801,0.000017490527,0.000036871694,0.9904715,0.004130939,0.002325267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039701215,0.000064454034,0.0035686009,0.00040496592,0.000048824528,0.0003253763,0.006189134,0.00035516213,0.00046680958,0.6759012,0.31259528,0.000040502327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041375253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082937576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041375253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004690746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062359674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082268834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960846","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.014","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395030898","doi":"10.29173/alr2709","title":"Tort Claims Against Public Authorities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.05163741507831677,"score_gpt":0.33421153037904755,"score_spread":0.2825741153007308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395030898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12128113,0.047961295,0.008612478,0.100576945,0.0010288076,0.00014832408,0.0003105573,0.00019224295,0.71988827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9285462,0.0126009835,0.0012906672,0.012599018,0.0010632263,0.00006723392,0.00009937041,0.000021850277,0.043711405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98542285,0.004608736,0.0007575624,0.0015629033,0.0055935197,0.0020544732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808045,0.011680343,0.0030185455,0.0014705592,0.0024470491,0.0005790326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010298741,0.0002997112,0.0006990497,0.004278605,0.0068528065,0.006960248,0.0014117687,0.010692411,0.00574935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030086976,0.00040713273,0.00083530997,0.0027850168,0.013984291,0.003969756,0.0045918035,0.0050811144,0.00093504624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010504018,0.000017315475,0.0016036493,0.00009245833,0.000020620133,0.00040568598,0.0032515444,0.00027886682,0.00015022847,0.96618974,0.013168667,0.014810816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037641817,0.00009948757,0.012128017,0.002061643,0.00017309374,0.0013341537,0.006199231,0.00090979907,0.00092455564,0.4764525,0.4995928,0.00008698057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020854633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019767355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020854633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006570954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009468574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054465592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031225","doi":"10.29173/alr2751","title":"The Thing and Judicial Methodology in Resolving Novel Property Claims: It Matters When It Matters","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1663550262980293,"score_gpt":0.3978192138991151,"score_spread":0.2314641876010858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031225","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04716385,0.038865026,0.3525165,0.34080184,0.002523775,0.000476708,0.00010587608,0.0001283604,0.21741809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8476905,0.009937942,0.09878079,0.033227064,0.0025789342,0.0005678565,0.00004726425,0.00012458993,0.007045104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90282595,0.06669919,0.0040446357,0.0059719286,0.016967114,0.003491182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8881852,0.087260835,0.0076606874,0.009057837,0.006332433,0.0015029439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1208401,0.0005210812,0.001401645,0.0045712553,0.007248613,0.0151726445,0.0038086346,0.012174712,0.002465349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10337485,0.0010266394,0.0013158332,0.0028352395,0.053813122,0.026217397,0.008441854,0.013052922,0.0005532562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007350336,0.000011006374,0.00048273624,0.00006573808,0.00001864699,0.00004972882,0.00091506174,0.00016792906,0.00009472505,0.9917299,0.00083517394,0.0056219357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003102558,0.00004894489,0.0008133836,0.0003258142,0.00002376052,0.00012238213,0.0012184569,0.0008360478,0.0003290048,0.97018087,0.0260382,0.00003218019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041564903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007882406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1208401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005896282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011074369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6390712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031238","doi":"10.29173/alr2752","title":"The Invention of Advantage: Annapolis Group v. Halifax Regional Municipality and Canadian De Facto Expropriation Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; De facto; Law; Political science; Group (periodic table); Business; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05122016600391824,"score_gpt":0.35614310550210554,"score_spread":0.3049229394981873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10823858,0.023244098,0.0019611001,0.16114768,0.0004587651,0.00006463128,0.00026909573,0.00004410746,0.7045719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257014,0.007512367,0.0010145613,0.01792865,0.00018282203,0.00002743632,0.00006618415,0.000022253553,0.047544252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995426,0.0005444357,0.000083393,0.0005444243,0.0017500374,0.0016516375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645424,0.0014057509,0.0002455145,0.00018881011,0.0011958606,0.00050985976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035992449,0.00025436125,0.00038459737,0.0019865902,0.0149240885,0.0110515505,0.0021349662,0.0057133,0.003746312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006344429,0.00034979073,0.00041379276,0.0025222267,0.020185946,0.0029260628,0.0028860893,0.0058080396,0.00017979453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013424193,0.000009774236,0.0018836051,0.000035469842,0.000008717928,0.0003475107,0.0036288626,0.0002743218,0.00014291484,0.9715788,0.014605298,0.0074714078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007140623,0.000037191126,0.03255801,0.00048688718,0.000112951406,0.00036215663,0.011889804,0.0012504196,0.00097291527,0.13758714,0.81447464,0.0001966043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11904856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11904856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12896205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8637618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067284","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1365","title":"Modernizing Non-Profit Law in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Profit (economics); Law; Business; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.042705371106519466,"score_gpt":0.30109568127793307,"score_spread":0.2583903101714136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3659167,0.01570552,0.008447397,0.17722248,0.0009387594,0.00063739397,0.0008442117,0.00053926336,0.42974833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062873,0.006001377,0.006461389,0.018142134,0.0001237712,0.00007207093,0.00026968474,0.000065322754,0.06257692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914835,0.00069556787,0.0002000675,0.00060040836,0.0036739225,0.003346499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98961323,0.0020663482,0.00054827944,0.00045397622,0.0050782664,0.0022398585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004289057,0.00030246112,0.00040567105,0.0022202833,0.014943682,0.008320015,0.0024279775,0.0026255497,0.0038822263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010867418,0.00051026494,0.0005189518,0.003385501,0.009423974,0.0019928624,0.0036234031,0.0039094407,0.00019787982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006909041,0.00014433666,0.019225297,0.00027211598,0.000053095453,0.0007099007,0.008688724,0.0054120007,0.0016742428,0.8022629,0.05789227,0.10359599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011500183,0.00012031933,0.13326235,0.0006327611,0.00013423924,0.00023159361,0.0136794485,0.010952046,0.0024362786,0.06130851,0.7768402,0.00028720658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99726045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2997924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2997924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47717813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81214154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395085984","doi":"10.1017/9781009243728.020","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395085984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395086076","doi":"10.1017/9781009110129.022","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"it","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03050789898583455,"score_gpt":0.2649620464377461,"score_spread":0.23445414745191157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395086076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085012324,0.010311272,0.0028906008,0.010925161,0.016885377,0.0012740477,0.16910598,0.003574474,0.784183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026412192,0.010570631,0.0015906579,0.0019809701,0.005019257,0.00060276216,0.07565411,0.0009778637,0.90096253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985927,0.00010801437,0.00019742832,0.00016314443,0.0008301934,0.00010858687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927045,0.0007809006,0.0004426382,0.00049820315,0.004886681,0.0006871185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010001551,0.0010621647,0.0010342682,0.008736976,0.0013806984,0.005748093,0.0013739119,0.0008729708,0.724205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010698985,0.00043487045,0.00057717867,0.010489027,0.00037665188,0.0033723004,0.0016424231,0.0012833923,0.63387704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016609421,0.000010057824,0.00008484982,0.00035220946,0.0000018352011,0.000015210094,0.00002255366,0.000053320684,0.00008598356,0.0012225163,0.95079345,0.047341388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030376927,0.000009484895,0.00035986613,0.00020593475,0.0000020934256,0.000014758132,0.000027246988,0.000014296614,0.00005123257,0.0006352066,0.9986726,0.000004222276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078031495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006356007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27579498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022256994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032115104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395086319","doi":"10.1017/9781009343756.016","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395086319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73285526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395087454","doi":"10.1017/9781108891349.043","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395087454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089469","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.033","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73285526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089508","doi":"10.1017/9781108953535.020","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Warwick","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73285526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089536","doi":"10.1017/9781108953535.013","title":"Competing in the Market: Acumen in Business and Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024878589041829432,"score_gpt":0.2386001175314982,"score_spread":0.21372152848966877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073387247,0.036068786,0.0009762023,0.014515012,0.0008646512,0.000016140308,0.00006905796,0.00004275522,0.9467135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04550899,0.03268327,0.000933542,0.0039166845,0.0011097318,0.000053148797,0.00011505404,0.00008941356,0.91559017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994462,0.00014491763,0.000014181229,0.000043046555,0.00028436317,0.00006722055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999273,0.00043271278,0.00002661597,0.00003986411,0.00014172788,0.000086077904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007303464,0.00048329128,0.0003867272,0.0012961284,0.002179545,0.008000391,0.00070316717,0.0022770318,0.05606011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016997205,0.00021901375,0.00019331748,0.0019507284,0.0040597655,0.0068247435,0.001278889,0.0026913022,0.010526474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004515173,0.0000110823585,0.000032257212,0.00009277411,0.0000010513374,0.00003315249,0.0005028587,0.00011101956,0.000059913462,0.77021676,0.1918924,0.037042093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019561087,0.000006577967,0.00011418253,0.00029899622,0.0000012276755,0.00006076664,0.0006067766,0.00018689793,0.000059910406,0.1414281,0.85722995,0.0000047088906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059641185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009480978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05606011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004278139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034313828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18753976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396593081","doi":"10.1093/9780191994487.001.0001","title":"The King Can Do No Wrong","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Liability; Common law; Harm; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.024956259597979057,"score_gpt":0.3159320671367518,"score_spread":0.2909758075387728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396593081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076197195,0.007106198,0.008161246,0.03696331,0.0019484235,0.000027396007,0.000063317944,0.00008269565,0.9380277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5079885,0.0074514886,0.0034751957,0.018032487,0.00089329516,0.000040627292,0.00011845014,0.00020916977,0.46179077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730444,0.0009607647,0.00008802102,0.0003504493,0.0010002909,0.0002959873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997954,0.0010502473,0.00009150345,0.00026574414,0.0005099055,0.00012865482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017599252,0.00030043413,0.00039239455,0.0008230598,0.005020619,0.0067309067,0.00088293815,0.0026508737,0.009713438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004389966,0.0002254544,0.0003115756,0.0005748385,0.020915397,0.0067053204,0.0026286258,0.00508629,0.0022016168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000318799,0.0000056306394,0.0000807378,0.000018168543,0.0000015776968,0.000059509388,0.0034807455,0.00008316234,0.00004278129,0.96986425,0.020848589,0.0055115875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038047726,0.00001593849,0.00024254755,0.00028707966,0.0000064589594,0.00022249413,0.003651264,0.00028285081,0.00034398702,0.33179414,0.6631338,0.000015688382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012192715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014891114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012192715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006965451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044812397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050538063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396595538","doi":"10.1017/9781009365987.009","title":"General Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.030248537880839272,"score_gpt":0.24812278949829283,"score_spread":0.21787425161745355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396595538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045545574,0.014806768,0.0028123802,0.007212778,0.011582685,0.0008168446,0.05704692,0.0032026202,0.9020636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012262168,0.011979915,0.0012280969,0.0015047181,0.0029648158,0.00032607795,0.028188348,0.0008020573,0.9517798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922657,0.000056095425,0.00007854754,0.00011832747,0.00045594038,0.000064555155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972283,0.00032289152,0.00015664754,0.00023166511,0.001715488,0.00034485932],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006935882,0.0010650078,0.0011207376,0.007939542,0.0012001077,0.0049417214,0.0017645503,0.0011954022,0.7255209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004930795,0.00057916215,0.0005609804,0.009979409,0.0004241744,0.0037110217,0.001555342,0.0015494463,0.63409644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008332369,0.000014130164,0.000046099154,0.00028807274,0.0000011842093,0.00001596813,0.000017880982,0.000046359135,0.000082007755,0.0015916142,0.9463581,0.051530328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017037848,0.000005764072,0.00017923432,0.00014454403,0.0000011340371,0.00001953808,0.0000128339925,0.000009942873,0.000026975205,0.0006349314,0.9989604,0.000003085709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064486465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007208314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7255209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022234991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002281559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39151108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396596000","doi":"10.1093/9780191994487.003.0006","title":"Revisiting and Understanding Crown Liability from a Historical Constitutional Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Liability; Crown (dentistry); Political science; History; Law; Art; Visual arts; Medicine","score_opus":0.09385856750221917,"score_gpt":0.3248453910475894,"score_spread":0.23098682354537026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396596000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019394198,0.034499023,0.041342974,0.05350587,0.0011259264,0.000044525408,0.00009755796,0.00005458422,0.8499353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89195645,0.021741724,0.010060015,0.0078078737,0.001681429,0.00009875674,0.00008416724,0.00011171518,0.066457935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946844,0.0025541913,0.00015679919,0.00065039017,0.0015282487,0.00042613642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994263,0.0041874265,0.00030032295,0.00040156278,0.0006916479,0.00015608748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007229625,0.00031644476,0.00037510804,0.0027847518,0.0054652407,0.010812914,0.0018745745,0.0041520065,0.0049065417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008816653,0.00032882963,0.00032030835,0.002110237,0.045932077,0.010158039,0.0031697447,0.0074642138,0.00053895894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1926947e-7,9.006444e-7,0.000010710887,0.000004279644,2.0920938e-7,0.000010251198,0.00063525606,0.00006081328,0.0000073017454,0.99818903,0.0004096199,0.00067123136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019564832,0.000007062627,0.00016661023,0.00022995786,0.0000033959454,0.000061584746,0.001627744,0.0004704188,0.00016231964,0.82987046,0.16738832,0.000010164171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019522022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020049492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019522022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018106036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008392687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13136911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686540","doi":"10.29173/mlj1132","title":"Jeremy Bentham and Canadian Evidence Law: The Utilitarian Perspective on Mistrial Applications","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jeremy bentham; Perspective (graphical); Law; Utilitarianism; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.039236506673517794,"score_gpt":0.31507943767699476,"score_spread":0.27584293100347695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686540","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00323471,0.02694659,0.017315688,0.7725233,0.002420359,0.0001052014,0.00021641373,0.000054651828,0.17718314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5134284,0.022202218,0.030979307,0.33983397,0.008204185,0.0005450303,0.00014185513,0.00025143308,0.084413595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94097227,0.024432689,0.0032965897,0.004772413,0.022564106,0.0039619184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90271205,0.0617205,0.0024215695,0.003959403,0.02567077,0.0035156715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048625436,0.0012168823,0.002298735,0.006538909,0.019086843,0.020104952,0.006239976,0.033896673,0.0070738085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10301149,0.0015443637,0.0012840849,0.007446205,0.07576103,0.015884575,0.0073298737,0.029512843,0.00088307663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052606265,0.0000060823186,0.000080252044,0.000038604518,0.000007588165,0.00003351106,0.00079487165,0.000122733,0.000015746873,0.9774162,0.019624945,0.0018541855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035268324,0.000007815576,0.000407805,0.00033200462,0.000025671981,0.00005629239,0.0007676674,0.00054801296,0.00006846175,0.90704197,0.09063261,0.00007632116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6583241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6795793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34167588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05520759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08342451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68737614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686911","doi":"10.29173/mlj1323","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and the Development of a Canadian Common Law of Contract","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Common law; Political science; Precedent","score_opus":0.028320569475101188,"score_gpt":0.2615189508743444,"score_spread":0.2331983813992432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020658398,0.013181634,0.006560037,0.32248747,0.0016374713,0.00020851489,0.00075263064,0.0000621042,0.63445175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77902967,0.008441677,0.010624154,0.07469747,0.0011831427,0.00027647032,0.0004049633,0.00013962749,0.12520278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97191715,0.004352479,0.0009723889,0.0024821553,0.013015453,0.007260405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651681,0.0083107,0.0010625635,0.0010525169,0.020377306,0.0040288367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014943702,0.0006210571,0.0012302898,0.004651382,0.035214134,0.019566983,0.0044174218,0.020838575,0.007847616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050268333,0.0012540879,0.0012437577,0.0045785713,0.030164829,0.005379241,0.0053534587,0.019090276,0.0005488183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037551783,0.000004663445,0.0001619282,0.0000075509734,0.0000036729473,0.000031019692,0.00052949716,0.00017803033,0.00001745665,0.9847056,0.0131152775,0.0012415004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009284603,0.00001729009,0.0043074805,0.00066191796,0.000076092,0.000082824095,0.0030915816,0.0022744092,0.00024605694,0.5930813,0.39586934,0.0001989287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98998827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18666095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18666095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46550074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.943358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396714799","doi":"10.29173/mlj1344","title":"Secrecy and Impunity: The Role of Law Societies in Canadian Wrongful Convictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Secrecy; Law; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.02248355761863561,"score_gpt":0.2834340914860085,"score_spread":0.2609505338673729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396714799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39787197,0.010269603,0.0015483436,0.27675885,0.00070231647,0.00012544556,0.0004280386,0.000038070528,0.31225738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98831964,0.00294793,0.00037116345,0.0028576585,0.00006578053,0.000020251391,0.000039706298,0.000011528598,0.00536643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925795,0.0012294268,0.0001946635,0.00043470896,0.0021736578,0.0033881073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97864574,0.005299363,0.001852989,0.00041439547,0.007878963,0.005908535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060639847,0.0005235885,0.000653543,0.005060421,0.035734996,0.014462994,0.002791029,0.004078386,0.009959666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024791395,0.0006488755,0.0007027267,0.006755338,0.02986574,0.0044391463,0.008232076,0.0071024187,0.0002334742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009158652,0.00009429834,0.04741013,0.00020089064,0.0000505418,0.00069064635,0.13036174,0.0009799413,0.00018065552,0.7506916,0.03088286,0.03836498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015242206,0.000049172166,0.2128072,0.0018244012,0.00039373312,0.00044507332,0.47318327,0.0036807237,0.00050891394,0.1412821,0.16523272,0.00044024017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99755967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21347275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21347275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38212213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9122601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715387","doi":"10.29173/mlj1278","title":"A Deposit in a Pre-Incorporation Transaction is Still a Deposit: A Comment on Benedetto v 2453912 Ontario Inc","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Database transaction; Law; Supreme court; Inclusion (mineral); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Chemistry; Computer science","score_opus":0.028134171894525203,"score_gpt":0.27279471984873666,"score_spread":0.24466054795421144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09450623,0.008551314,0.0022180302,0.5408585,0.0042479904,0.00032856947,0.0012171328,0.0002620375,0.3478103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24660315,0.0037235045,0.0013553981,0.6064955,0.0026728858,0.00023776547,0.00029582038,0.00015623972,0.13845971],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906385,0.00080254255,0.0005641861,0.0013943606,0.003924436,0.0026759647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348336,0.0035771655,0.00030052138,0.00025189322,0.001774009,0.0006131492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051313573,0.00085057376,0.00092150556,0.0008359768,0.029850492,0.007681462,0.006126795,0.051028114,0.004494555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012847034,0.0020055454,0.0016379615,0.0015201074,0.009409874,0.0028204957,0.0025972803,0.02285821,0.0011535167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027545632,0.0000852756,0.007997353,0.0002676197,0.00007277763,0.0091271065,0.043964475,0.00061005336,0.0042317617,0.3428324,0.58163124,0.0089044785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014596604,0.00013657806,0.02061982,0.00067054026,0.00022234484,0.0014104386,0.018996276,0.00124069,0.0016789562,0.016561083,0.9378302,0.00048711948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93227565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9720643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06772435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051772982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06348755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37564105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715396","doi":"10.29173/mlj1276","title":"The Premier Should Not Also Be the Attorney General: Roncarelli v Duplessis Revisited as a Cautionary Tale in Legal Ethics and Professionalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.11005269162942016,"score_gpt":0.3810515904134437,"score_spread":0.27099889878402356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042946197,0.004683253,0.0037553376,0.8177493,0.001596479,0.00007522761,0.000042895255,0.00007014592,0.12908122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6927226,0.0014129415,0.0027345917,0.25718185,0.0013696481,0.00010281167,0.000013270596,0.00008262954,0.044379625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99120635,0.0028216876,0.00024739245,0.0018273552,0.0019840368,0.0019131242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949373,0.0024284078,0.0003986006,0.00026459186,0.00084833876,0.0011226462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012766637,0.00035368954,0.0006756455,0.0007076457,0.016041923,0.011330947,0.0032525207,0.019386366,0.002185801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014581126,0.0006437779,0.000596316,0.00068471045,0.02355353,0.0046159783,0.004102173,0.024654595,0.0004517092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021098114,0.000014698996,0.001090197,0.000024951001,0.0000071201416,0.0004720546,0.005656294,0.00007700166,0.00023893677,0.95506436,0.033233628,0.004099778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016052314,0.00014536535,0.0061030593,0.0008237495,0.00010651732,0.0012047553,0.017528703,0.002822517,0.0020569079,0.35945597,0.60936964,0.00022229542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41619217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58633363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5838078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023140771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043285944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8275393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396975299","doi":"10.1017/9781009354059.015","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396975299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398193230","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4764926","title":"Introduction to The King Can Do No Wrong - Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Crown (dentistry); Liability; Constitutional law; Common law; Tort; Political science","score_opus":0.013772361982716879,"score_gpt":0.2828532760666811,"score_spread":0.26908091408396423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398193230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020027464,0.06331681,0.018964257,0.22796787,0.0033546665,0.00005224284,0.00044729284,0.00006100082,0.6658083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7312318,0.022801038,0.0062315976,0.034686763,0.008482303,0.00011417478,0.00017146923,0.00010494538,0.19617598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900657,0.00035723645,0.000052777148,0.00020710022,0.00024637094,0.00012990664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712557,0.002175458,0.00012545697,0.00020907671,0.00025516062,0.00010928453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019779603,0.00029347074,0.00043540224,0.0010014485,0.0036322002,0.004732558,0.0012193304,0.005601945,0.011318433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050654723,0.00033005013,0.0004818173,0.0015456018,0.017998312,0.0066897264,0.00140952,0.007208413,0.0011649983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000203041,0.0000056052604,0.00006260145,0.000011445707,0.0000010149298,0.000015414797,0.00026023513,0.00007863702,0.000012720271,0.9892441,0.007807234,0.0024988377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031927432,0.0000074198265,0.00040406946,0.000087091845,0.0000034302006,0.000036726404,0.00022730784,0.00017016844,0.000042714848,0.905296,0.093711086,0.000010707276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015650082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017539449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015650082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004310777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024329603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03786397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398195909","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttae029","title":"Grin and bare it: the recent kerfuffle over bare trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Law and economics; Law; Settlor; Business; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.030175455780343096,"score_gpt":0.35613617721505175,"score_spread":0.32596072143470867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398195909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05645054,0.03102755,0.0064816102,0.69121855,0.0032534613,0.000022666503,0.00015781519,0.00007564549,0.2113122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186886,0.010215334,0.0009039027,0.049984634,0.0008587689,0.000013502692,0.000037273592,0.00006751353,0.019230464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98989534,0.0032489682,0.00024521668,0.0009463025,0.0033724066,0.0022917332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97141135,0.013498476,0.0018818721,0.0016255893,0.0061465465,0.005436188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015079249,0.0002047998,0.0004535068,0.0012709135,0.015039224,0.0114163915,0.0014655781,0.0048090904,0.0054972903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030117745,0.0003460561,0.00034067009,0.001932317,0.04953011,0.009769736,0.0044178185,0.011240548,0.00039456642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001885601,0.000006617864,0.00072795886,0.000041836,0.0000039517636,0.00022126728,0.012599329,0.00009800022,0.000060408496,0.93544775,0.036526788,0.014247232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011434788,0.000023461676,0.004463559,0.0006761581,0.00001011724,0.00045964716,0.029090533,0.0004962748,0.00023906659,0.25580704,0.70862263,0.00010014702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6037315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67725044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6037315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04687281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035044372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7972044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398352792","doi":"10.7910/dvn/gjetme","title":"Petition of Isaac Rice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.02509888228613531,"score_gpt":0.3073245479805167,"score_spread":0.2822256656943814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398352792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027264592,0.00273871,0.0004356805,0.054894503,0.026160209,0.00014775888,0.0008483784,0.0006341793,0.9114142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005138918,0.00025713522,0.00011048213,0.0056238864,0.00071024743,0.00003108126,0.0001685662,0.00010386786,0.98785585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982668,0.00014988231,0.000036282,0.00040740543,0.0006558293,0.00048377152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988398,0.00009780613,0.00004045225,0.00012144944,0.00044775088,0.0004528124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014201825,0.00094049075,0.00065724354,0.00088800205,0.00714099,0.0047784955,0.0012508472,0.005050156,0.22423878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035781735,0.0006532603,0.0006031145,0.00065596733,0.0015151665,0.0017564328,0.0026121244,0.010076132,0.11252213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020295916,0.0000092616065,0.0000654326,0.000012642865,0.0000012437664,0.00008235265,0.00006215984,0.000018024126,0.000095232295,0.003825828,0.99251807,0.0032895242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033829551,0.000010658813,0.0004806171,0.000025540672,0.0000016011649,0.000053425403,0.00014071504,0.00002455281,0.00008951117,0.00027310968,0.9988914,0.0000054664374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029051127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07349484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22423878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00364487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047384463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7501535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398759315","doi":"10.1017/9781009170628.018","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398759315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398768347","doi":"10.29173/mlj830","title":"Shareholder Proposals Mechanism under the Manitoba Corporations Act: A Proposal for Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Shareholder; Business; Accounting; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.051016998219173,"score_gpt":0.29966820036307645,"score_spread":0.24865120214390346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398768347","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123915814,0.0023017135,0.028081998,0.4950284,0.0047291196,0.004952519,0.0009972082,0.00087348325,0.3391197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5324386,0.0014320292,0.03553671,0.12448983,0.0016240688,0.0034843956,0.00028528812,0.0001155746,0.3005935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97965646,0.005205238,0.0007524151,0.0021591517,0.0068037855,0.0054230075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694951,0.013564541,0.0011240463,0.0023020685,0.009640438,0.003873838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026337763,0.0011150892,0.0013222005,0.0030472483,0.013989676,0.017609231,0.009638458,0.041652653,0.01598026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04660847,0.002156449,0.0020946078,0.0021189202,0.013553534,0.009084999,0.005914581,0.01673552,0.002413612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017091224,0.0004370253,0.0030128388,0.00010847506,0.00006686283,0.00045978194,0.0020809711,0.0010754082,0.001066064,0.94457054,0.035772752,0.011178473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032593496,0.0012517961,0.0203205,0.0012311261,0.0010105593,0.00077674066,0.009061693,0.022745425,0.0077977446,0.30392915,0.6276849,0.00093108445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4099248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50290227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5900752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031081432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18559478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81507754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398768359","doi":"10.29173/mlj865","title":"Billy, Don't You Lose My Number: Law Reform with Respect to the Serial Numbered Goods Regime under the Manitoba PPSA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Business; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.026501834425016493,"score_gpt":0.2821237528783797,"score_spread":0.25562191845336324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398768359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3044567,0.0024502566,0.0025110792,0.268258,0.0015402364,0.00032783585,0.00040316652,0.00011457954,0.41993818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64575934,0.0013825524,0.0021878018,0.07338509,0.00034795803,0.00030998394,0.00008324126,0.000064080596,0.27648002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567777,0.0011245942,0.00013107971,0.00046987983,0.0009233632,0.001673373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594396,0.0013405704,0.00024953447,0.00022085276,0.0012768345,0.00096826005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048735538,0.0003634627,0.00047448007,0.0010718461,0.019991811,0.011193638,0.0027538799,0.011443583,0.011893473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010446812,0.0011360917,0.00049865467,0.0018076331,0.010129331,0.0034291542,0.005054053,0.011257499,0.0014124265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009426118,0.0001872858,0.0069807423,0.0000873222,0.000032861328,0.0008390418,0.008959032,0.00085780735,0.0010964996,0.9195084,0.049551055,0.011805611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045422575,0.0004597506,0.055673584,0.0010374363,0.0003200054,0.0005381825,0.048347816,0.0058664805,0.0038198212,0.16322875,0.71990865,0.00034534672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79617876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9131665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20382124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030653266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12668884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41004312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020550","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.069","title":"16 January 1753. Cleland to Edward Dickinson","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.020184684533509713,"score_gpt":0.34409890183181024,"score_spread":0.32391421729830056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019937332,0.0071378485,0.00019376038,0.0105510885,0.010765939,0.00006480672,0.002551673,0.00039341542,0.96814215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036071026,0.0007846558,0.00003153666,0.00069812365,0.00023897731,0.000009770467,0.00024856557,0.00005656301,0.99757105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996536,0.000032769603,0.000018190152,0.000074874864,0.00016469996,0.00005581244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994597,0.00007845925,0.000026050338,0.00004897041,0.00027491624,0.00011194408],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043853067,0.0007017854,0.0005266319,0.0012443027,0.0020416044,0.004050637,0.0009073633,0.0019522699,0.6747021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023063736,0.00039901945,0.00030188524,0.0011346358,0.0004702256,0.0018342092,0.0015462994,0.0021132533,0.5507565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010902914,0.0000028455977,0.000021488357,0.000026316337,6.135776e-7,0.000018011886,0.000014715236,0.00000954184,0.000027644906,0.0022430483,0.98581356,0.011811318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012632149,0.0000014993897,0.000074839656,0.000032693904,2.6465472e-7,0.000007164344,0.00001625262,0.000003908161,0.000010341587,0.00015623085,0.99969447,0.0000011170117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016018607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040157143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6747021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016336963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013878563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46399796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020592","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.140","title":"An Unsigned Note by Cleland, [1757–1766]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012981545666430016,"score_gpt":0.36270809901534784,"score_spread":0.34972655334891783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012379806,0.021259163,0.0026648426,0.16233927,0.06663525,0.00026763455,0.004368364,0.00037254993,0.740855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059928712,0.004344334,0.001298868,0.07849902,0.005120241,0.00020177255,0.00084081886,0.00029978933,0.9034024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981723,0.00028926705,0.00017154546,0.0003951595,0.0007959617,0.00017579451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980325,0.00062460237,0.00010423918,0.00012960286,0.000982914,0.00012609598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020574664,0.00080031424,0.00041410548,0.001593916,0.004934568,0.0044922535,0.0012587083,0.006221124,0.05616462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007767589,0.00058774295,0.00049220887,0.0016528663,0.0016903791,0.003408881,0.001460906,0.007541182,0.030971045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056372,0.000003983198,0.00004174175,0.000027308832,0.0000012546413,0.000024416155,0.00014546407,0.000012402143,0.00006116932,0.018618155,0.9764797,0.0045785885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020050434,0.000002359535,0.00023876198,0.00006732934,0.0000014697666,0.000020832666,0.000054607644,0.000014508054,0.000062027524,0.0014919976,0.99803513,0.000008866152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09520789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15510821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09520789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004148032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007508374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18930745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020603","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.054","title":"24 November 1749. Letter from Lovel Stanhope to John Sharpe Enclosing Bonds Relating to Individuals Committed to Appear before the Court of King’s Bench","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Bond; Operations research; Genealogy; Engineering; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.029619966203072563,"score_gpt":0.31639406379550766,"score_spread":0.2867740975924351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014727096,0.0066544106,0.00025976158,0.09224036,0.018207077,0.000104101855,0.0015306236,0.00019569274,0.8793353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029454823,0.00044415076,0.000037068286,0.01004101,0.00056358817,0.000019570125,0.00009758893,0.000048636157,0.9858029],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921775,0.00008165182,0.00003469755,0.00012029278,0.0003029148,0.00024271553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990876,0.0002657072,0.00004055307,0.000042907723,0.00038416722,0.00017912147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009366678,0.00071623235,0.0005036432,0.0007511074,0.008472431,0.0047850967,0.00088465866,0.007933561,0.23215853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060948175,0.00062258437,0.00044147085,0.0006031239,0.0011653029,0.0018371091,0.0021726773,0.0080434345,0.10813826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023925773,0.0000061132296,0.00011639964,0.000022700995,0.00000196515,0.00016546565,0.00017994388,0.0000093222825,0.00009641673,0.007754084,0.98741525,0.004208353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056834715,0.000007683447,0.00071451865,0.00006807758,0.0000020801422,0.00004528021,0.00026305544,0.000016331558,0.00008273177,0.0011162378,0.9976713,0.000006998167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04905372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14910246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23215853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030689598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025895983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7766476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020606","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.145","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020812","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.020","title":"10 February 1736. William Cleland to the Court of Directors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.02008791278118498,"score_gpt":0.31304699409017134,"score_spread":0.29295908130898635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052044966,0.0046573943,0.0002857618,0.03149203,0.009134159,0.00013126846,0.0021583694,0.0002544288,0.9513661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019854775,0.00060474954,0.00007439806,0.008077594,0.00074161886,0.000054152075,0.00030827906,0.000079358346,0.9880745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983985,0.00020017891,0.00007634309,0.00024851208,0.0007436847,0.00033287844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987575,0.00029508726,0.000048889728,0.00010687261,0.0006403875,0.0001512108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015517805,0.0008996547,0.0007196773,0.0013280495,0.0063604177,0.006476477,0.0014990789,0.0074928864,0.27811953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006722196,0.0006582914,0.0006741269,0.0011464625,0.0009841546,0.002252625,0.0019296795,0.008216121,0.1499012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012989509,0.000006860034,0.00005192133,0.00001796192,0.00000163197,0.000051677594,0.000040849554,0.00001362515,0.00004888697,0.011406741,0.98338646,0.004960397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004087952,0.0000037794184,0.00026561852,0.000072896866,0.0000020448663,0.000017532595,0.00006695711,0.000019571264,0.000044013217,0.0012098881,0.99828833,0.0000052790806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06944556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16372149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27811953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00410502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004580649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9304025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020997","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.072","title":"31 January 1753. Cleland to Edward Dickinson","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.021075929068574684,"score_gpt":0.3453510796778523,"score_spread":0.3242751506092776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021637925,0.008332756,0.0001947301,0.0110903885,0.010911354,0.000065467895,0.0025871866,0.00037732173,0.9662243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00038838797,0.0008803687,0.000030938747,0.00067363615,0.00023401223,0.000009602638,0.00024422698,0.000053470616,0.9974854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967265,0.00002912891,0.000016525022,0.00006856882,0.00015919757,0.000053928903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995061,0.00006864245,0.000024203457,0.000042804615,0.00025554135,0.000102719074],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040736838,0.0007007609,0.0005169538,0.0012294925,0.0020465623,0.0038779005,0.00087256,0.001868086,0.6539653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002149387,0.00038751288,0.0002922269,0.0011374853,0.00043646462,0.0017493056,0.0015264184,0.0020706435,0.52148294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010973524,0.000002803715,0.000021937809,0.000025500658,5.847432e-7,0.000019837727,0.00001524485,0.000010477523,0.00002876049,0.0022090427,0.98596954,0.011685184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011823031,0.0000014619002,0.000079280915,0.000032421038,2.4863502e-7,0.000007449468,0.00001660345,0.000004038696,0.00001039509,0.00015055899,0.9996953,0.0000011421841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017267212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04512355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6539653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016624121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001361608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49357647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399036151","doi":"10.29173/mlj721","title":"Interview with Howard Pawley","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04878121524588696,"score_gpt":0.2940225930122529,"score_spread":0.24524137776636595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399036151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037446044,0.005773808,0.0004650171,0.86376834,0.007771601,0.00021617189,0.0008785642,0.00007718277,0.08360318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07105759,0.0023625826,0.00046260672,0.5161709,0.00096543506,0.00024064971,0.00020405647,0.000066203735,0.40846995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989792,0.00027792508,0.000023064484,0.00011028717,0.00021491772,0.00039456916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979278,0.00057761127,0.00006859368,0.000035927344,0.00059117924,0.0007988603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015714242,0.00045539922,0.00044451217,0.0010470708,0.021900263,0.0032839116,0.0010624572,0.0060666814,0.033295006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071906657,0.00072594016,0.00033056404,0.0011840166,0.0024196703,0.0027413876,0.0020575998,0.012116241,0.0051646163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033087807,0.00005821247,0.0033015688,0.000045495304,0.0000064046453,0.0009731858,0.013424547,0.00004825261,0.00044496602,0.004060988,0.96992636,0.007676923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001155714,0.00003355901,0.008944748,0.00007664866,0.000009354412,0.00034441098,0.090169236,0.00005907882,0.0003503505,0.0010842448,0.89887846,0.000038274895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40151644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6134639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40151644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010364102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018254094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7983587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060908","doi":"10.29173/mlj729","title":"Manitoba Tort Cases since the Turn of the Century","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Turn (biochemistry); History; Political science; Law; Liability; Chemistry","score_opus":0.029159125473657142,"score_gpt":0.28555173314051396,"score_spread":0.25639260766685684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37954053,0.05340228,0.0010817006,0.22555012,0.0015280901,0.00010724094,0.0012377618,0.00007899093,0.3374732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7904177,0.028748741,0.0013492294,0.030751077,0.00086751,0.00008027951,0.00034130784,0.00006849926,0.14737576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997867,0.00031004424,0.00007947361,0.00024055665,0.00073802576,0.0007648937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948456,0.001106784,0.0008097463,0.00013337079,0.0021700503,0.0009343797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017722491,0.00031531425,0.00039616256,0.002498668,0.013434701,0.006628972,0.0014886028,0.0037055872,0.0069949008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005744086,0.0007029454,0.00037745346,0.0045602745,0.006665433,0.0017554985,0.0037869017,0.004308958,0.0005192772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022794015,0.00023261593,0.090484075,0.00068674766,0.00016825825,0.0033161445,0.056304727,0.001167692,0.0017829909,0.5317597,0.16797736,0.14589168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040751136,0.00006208119,0.20290743,0.0012883105,0.000116827854,0.0007672942,0.022708349,0.00045237344,0.0010252101,0.013340475,0.757184,0.00010679042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8800523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97382575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11994767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07124794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.067323685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5169424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399075632","doi":"10.29173/mlj1055","title":"Introduction","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.022966971131650703,"score_gpt":0.28668764374564343,"score_spread":0.26372067261399273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399075632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008983415,0.0027903968,0.0056727533,0.01850392,0.0015103744,0.00021781698,0.005339821,0.00047532318,0.9565062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1013788,0.0037494097,0.004941013,0.011978829,0.0005660106,0.00016033572,0.0037874633,0.00018912554,0.87324893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705815,0.00019993496,0.000068931855,0.00051886763,0.0015117099,0.000642424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960747,0.00030773738,0.00016290497,0.00025283603,0.0026883304,0.000513513],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020139914,0.00043149843,0.00029960036,0.0012306138,0.0050879456,0.0068237707,0.0019191426,0.0026396099,0.14663133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00515885,0.00020803697,0.00037506546,0.0020205546,0.0021098754,0.0019831331,0.0018803503,0.001723535,0.034844507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054057477,0.000051724957,0.0058476357,0.00028366438,0.000008651555,0.00030715074,0.0030461317,0.0003455357,0.00057009584,0.40669513,0.43342024,0.14936994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030700726,0.000009396858,0.00419879,0.00019529334,0.0000036414128,0.00008367625,0.00088755396,0.00008332301,0.00015057331,0.004485886,0.9898865,0.000012329529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55649626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60760677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85336864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014941689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02615736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8922312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399195557","doi":"10.1017/9781009253994.011","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399195557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399213721","doi":"10.21638/spbu25.2024.107","title":"The constitutionalisation of private law: Comparative analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pravovedenie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Private law; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Public law; International human rights law; Comparative law; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.062346755492209735,"score_gpt":0.3937672538034147,"score_spread":0.33142049831120496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399213721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054435704,0.024284195,0.019493533,0.0062944647,0.0001555111,0.000053462958,0.00017395832,0.000022270613,0.89508694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701541,0.012713321,0.0041196262,0.00051534927,0.0001858475,0.000119186516,0.00018188496,0.000033352415,0.011977358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275607,0.0047087036,0.00015455802,0.0004509115,0.0013822416,0.00054747576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363166,0.0050598956,0.00028619493,0.0004056911,0.0005144036,0.0001021098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005900037,0.00022657582,0.0005392367,0.004987752,0.0034925004,0.00699386,0.0009525783,0.0017059271,0.009512879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008963189,0.00021890666,0.00051478826,0.007115784,0.012735082,0.008631945,0.004148262,0.0021925173,0.00032812377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050383373,0.0000049523455,0.00010795817,0.000045007608,0.0000042910347,0.000021150077,0.0012111809,0.0001406565,0.00002390516,0.9938094,0.00039759892,0.00422885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028718943,0.000076546756,0.0048732962,0.0006238036,0.000045365694,0.00025073666,0.012492949,0.0015564193,0.00057880604,0.7591734,0.2202717,0.000028200588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087176375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009236878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012073732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012073732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002405813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08760142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399357646","doi":"10.35948/1590-5586/2024.571","title":"Mutuo o donazione? The presumption of resulting trust (British Columbia, K.G. v D.G., 2023)","year":2024,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Trusts","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02505365084238423,"score_gpt":0.3007133194420429,"score_spread":0.2756596685996586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399357646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042663626,0.008245627,0.0011189689,0.2679225,0.0016885794,0.00014436361,0.0006968218,0.000077489305,0.677442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47368178,0.0029414664,0.0007283029,0.15474208,0.000342242,0.00020044428,0.00015465562,0.00006507765,0.36714384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581003,0.00047804185,0.00013503381,0.00051936443,0.0012099985,0.0018474245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978338,0.0005926778,0.00011329127,0.0001555518,0.00078864594,0.0005160976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027548817,0.0004487487,0.0003643882,0.00059232087,0.019734666,0.008758767,0.0022750425,0.013962281,0.011209435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072491653,0.0006112692,0.00044706947,0.0009934882,0.011402354,0.002862609,0.0026827625,0.014995944,0.0013499394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051679413,0.000051377294,0.0048462413,0.000072580566,0.000017821152,0.001813075,0.011433499,0.00022689639,0.0005021625,0.7516401,0.21073014,0.01861442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009537837,0.000055378307,0.015004438,0.0006499707,0.000067866706,0.00057243346,0.013449763,0.00071192335,0.00086071296,0.0770309,0.89131904,0.00018209418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95981365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98118997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05182091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05182091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10577285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37598878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399484990","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192868084.001.0001","title":"Furmston and Tolhurst on Contract Formation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.039520135694147994,"score_gpt":0.25990463910990963,"score_spread":0.22038450341576163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399484990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090559304,0.016749462,0.0038699412,0.013281083,0.0021418969,0.000051818926,0.000060033544,0.000031850694,0.9629083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05003029,0.01870353,0.0031762058,0.0059233713,0.0012693196,0.00015185132,0.0001175931,0.00010072237,0.9205271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982651,0.0005835912,0.00006892577,0.00019044889,0.0007557397,0.00013615338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991124,0.0004922636,0.000041091796,0.00012368867,0.00016697455,0.00006348188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015535649,0.00050645147,0.00035736582,0.001189353,0.0030334885,0.004901769,0.0007299985,0.0020521395,0.024940474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003865493,0.0002532568,0.00033169703,0.0014263218,0.009042219,0.004976264,0.0024932944,0.0036317948,0.0051161265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032817354,0.0000053150097,0.000021662245,0.000026399366,6.188319e-7,0.000024111789,0.0007958086,0.00011732633,0.00002108176,0.90769964,0.0778992,0.013385561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002717459,0.0000063451525,0.000108029264,0.0003020521,9.970295e-7,0.000046654135,0.00039421063,0.00016714279,0.00004166985,0.1991,0.7998252,0.0000049657033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011127736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011695093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024940474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007765157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005193525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083434165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399617902","doi":"10.1017/9781009516075.007","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399617902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399618958","doi":"10.1007/s10982-024-09499-z","title":"The Personality of Public Authorities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Personality; Political science; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Public law","score_opus":0.07397664850377451,"score_gpt":0.3367470778601837,"score_spread":0.2627704293564092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399618958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42184392,0.0013149537,0.0053197094,0.07547997,0.00040159182,0.000031411426,0.000062223335,0.00006041963,0.4954859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917818,0.00014706083,0.00019135511,0.000693569,0.000033343546,0.000005276792,0.0000058147098,0.0000087540575,0.007133058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937238,0.004289342,0.00010246578,0.00023440407,0.00080238126,0.0008476904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99011594,0.0032325792,0.0010237363,0.00090437516,0.0016828525,0.0030405375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00381637,0.00012470032,0.00019427465,0.00086336886,0.0044744336,0.009241706,0.00042715677,0.0014141587,0.0032845999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016540227,0.00021557439,0.00011427985,0.00091804005,0.01211506,0.00419567,0.0021760748,0.0024500825,0.0005182207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058068603,0.000063744024,0.020694297,0.000037640875,0.000023572675,0.00027129927,0.11586066,0.0004167059,0.0004872771,0.81574976,0.016123326,0.030213699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020445883,0.0000868412,0.037656214,0.00012703186,0.0000137352545,0.0003483582,0.1475466,0.0013323355,0.00025019152,0.5670716,0.24550171,0.000044814104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005104243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048716273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009241706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022285965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038394656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020183086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400063866","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4870697","title":"Civil law trusts? Lessons from Quebec and other jurisdictions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Business; Commercial law","score_opus":0.020582069038202148,"score_gpt":0.3272660178882441,"score_spread":0.30668394885004197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400063866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3750577,0.019657105,0.0014616624,0.24430706,0.0005383685,0.00015485447,0.002027965,0.000056723795,0.3567386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697383,0.0028596995,0.0004121509,0.008334836,0.00006985442,0.000040252202,0.00018747464,0.000021876562,0.018335618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949909,0.001045866,0.00009259326,0.0003191345,0.0008895903,0.0026619106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98506886,0.0046766917,0.0008369514,0.0005168937,0.0059208605,0.0029797647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055183577,0.00034741336,0.0007406376,0.0030485378,0.01831613,0.012042774,0.002824123,0.004650629,0.015391949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014968634,0.00031552053,0.00063108077,0.006767187,0.01003451,0.006785663,0.003444894,0.004649069,0.0004342162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002187165,0.0002447806,0.07265017,0.00032553062,0.00015707861,0.0018439102,0.04218877,0.0018074965,0.00023777249,0.6892638,0.11847918,0.07258281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022602595,0.00013629503,0.25672665,0.0040928987,0.00032504092,0.0006381888,0.25510606,0.0034500621,0.0004726887,0.08920026,0.3893321,0.00029379482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99416983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10427491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10427491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11007128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.756571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400239463","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4878608","title":"The Continuity of Private and Public Law Reasoning in Chief Justice McLachlin's Criminal Law Judgments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Public law; Criminal justice; Private law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.01816514642784234,"score_gpt":0.3092303468588079,"score_spread":0.29106520043096556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400239463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7358525,0.00055068766,0.02660121,0.050309394,0.00021754252,0.00012121166,0.0001621665,0.0000986656,0.18608664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709046,0.000018090088,0.0014202121,0.00037717834,0.000019420791,0.000018083498,0.0000102903905,0.000014114718,0.0010321671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98560077,0.0068239057,0.00066707836,0.0024348632,0.002869063,0.0016043147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9199728,0.06491651,0.0031821188,0.005193914,0.004196551,0.002538018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014395976,0.0000923083,0.0006351325,0.0019373548,0.008336007,0.015716936,0.0021148468,0.0053857067,0.006292549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12421864,0.00080636825,0.00046112385,0.0012843772,0.016146319,0.018371504,0.0052209403,0.006963522,0.00036731668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047514855,0.0001425954,0.010538656,0.0000408704,0.000035770463,0.00045399525,0.06097301,0.0012701211,0.00067749416,0.8916402,0.00485658,0.02889554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012219226,0.0000794748,0.020950036,0.000100524885,0.00004138257,0.00019090557,0.03608674,0.0081728995,0.0014730194,0.9204586,0.012257241,0.00006693534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02646827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029375883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008017384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011879831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076134145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400478024","doi":"10.1017/9781108983624.012","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400478024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400598815","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v43i2.8293","title":"The Territorial Scope of Australia’s Unfair Contract Terms Provisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Project commissioning; Publishing; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.025840957248229327,"score_gpt":0.2995478676164416,"score_spread":0.27370691036821226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400598815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06207668,0.003497232,0.021033376,0.013383586,0.00012633255,0.0001845804,0.00012654561,0.0000420877,0.8995296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464052,0.0017063996,0.0090489155,0.0028703797,0.000110753,0.00034109072,0.00006631781,0.000032462598,0.039418522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98383313,0.0046955114,0.0010164843,0.001565402,0.0067631076,0.0021264404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990594,0.0043103592,0.001154645,0.0011115767,0.0022237399,0.0006055728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008267133,0.0002568499,0.00044324467,0.0014932425,0.006101164,0.0071468647,0.0013799223,0.0035326653,0.0036164273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012493175,0.00083282986,0.00062127376,0.001433696,0.019948658,0.004541565,0.006977401,0.004140135,0.0007228581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029961188,0.0000050394797,0.00032795776,0.000023636705,0.0000029843497,0.00009546855,0.0047046356,0.00018224584,0.00020882818,0.9908112,0.001072285,0.0025627238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027115904,0.00007839463,0.016505051,0.001002532,0.0000669781,0.0010736802,0.01651432,0.002766913,0.0010326428,0.5879949,0.37282905,0.00010837779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06572002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08372636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06572002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007234003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014774819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13067496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400684085","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4896338","title":"Private Property Interests, and Statutes of Limitation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private property; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02578722948605795,"score_gpt":0.31887681858435524,"score_spread":0.2930895890982973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400684085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13015741,0.009200153,0.09507644,0.07891636,0.0005827627,0.00024094907,0.0013144482,0.00019106912,0.6843204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530431,0.0021280316,0.0060756803,0.005297976,0.0008723693,0.00041258376,0.00025490113,0.000054465392,0.031860877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870423,0.0050780606,0.0011143555,0.0021100086,0.003284427,0.001370822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92020106,0.06413904,0.0069279275,0.004750283,0.0029535526,0.0010281872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01820275,0.00051832397,0.0013566957,0.0040550157,0.0053411885,0.012582348,0.0025494555,0.012015289,0.011662378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058770988,0.0011614227,0.0011004966,0.005451162,0.024283169,0.016580686,0.004829694,0.009020322,0.0012316133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006405333,0.000015014648,0.0003871967,0.000011736567,0.000004131774,0.000022644885,0.000216329,0.00015787758,0.000017732846,0.99643314,0.0011909687,0.0015368528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014047597,0.0000053711124,0.00037689903,0.00003486459,0.000007789164,0.000039475042,0.00016096982,0.00047248128,0.000040182204,0.9947062,0.004135455,0.000006389605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069342237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008148164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01820275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042309887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055215247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09626651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879696","doi":"10.7202/1112504ar","title":"Speech of Justice McKinnon: Induction Into the Common Law Honour Society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05323877694658328,"score_gpt":0.37113799284031673,"score_spread":0.31789921589373343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400879696","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073291725,0.0377097,0.0019454389,0.7196818,0.0052934936,0.000115746836,0.00026382098,0.00005472032,0.22760612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39107233,0.02146685,0.0026990178,0.33923745,0.005538067,0.00043738223,0.00019459389,0.00014152337,0.23921277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98623484,0.004979618,0.0007211519,0.0017133123,0.0037677723,0.0025832031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97677386,0.01613373,0.0013703771,0.00097161037,0.0032257766,0.00152464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013469701,0.0005362087,0.000619193,0.0012744659,0.011477044,0.008270198,0.0025151263,0.017403277,0.0068730023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04779942,0.0007274571,0.00039721426,0.0010967791,0.015144726,0.010468829,0.007330339,0.017352022,0.0022923793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005533247,0.000021023461,0.00033037853,0.00016110786,0.000005927384,0.00035599235,0.011545936,0.000069863665,0.00038898026,0.5572505,0.40892756,0.020887448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003490046,0.000023517607,0.0028872427,0.0007364878,0.000017781535,0.00015512921,0.006210221,0.0001518872,0.00087408896,0.093988806,0.8948358,0.000084071486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22513056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25668126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22513056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019818062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038106877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4476403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401062233","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3982","title":"Tawdry or Honourable? Additional Payments to Representative Plaintiffs in Ontario and Beyond","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Payment; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.035326563201308926,"score_gpt":0.3279661807484607,"score_spread":0.29263961754715173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401062233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39729613,0.0013591225,0.0033207582,0.06574784,0.00041984685,0.00016550002,0.00012363867,0.000056191973,0.53151095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93884736,0.00037811158,0.0007068872,0.003655852,0.00008321017,0.000030214023,0.000017652263,0.000010755178,0.05626992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400735,0.00077725423,0.00016718112,0.00056060427,0.0018519412,0.0026356296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606484,0.0010207477,0.00058508816,0.0003085542,0.00083678076,0.0011841009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034278883,0.00027642393,0.00035803654,0.0007336029,0.017758785,0.0063116397,0.0014993773,0.0045509757,0.0075817243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009173678,0.0003378947,0.0003134126,0.00083076477,0.0091948975,0.0031525027,0.0038658874,0.0038163716,0.00040559715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075805714,0.00005954038,0.013625356,0.00005722945,0.000022134564,0.0014945093,0.03783318,0.000358522,0.0012945129,0.8853988,0.028257234,0.031523187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010020823,0.00013714854,0.08082161,0.00046089236,0.00012443874,0.0010964666,0.05572346,0.0024460587,0.0017616999,0.1548071,0.7023258,0.0001950408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80926186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94432265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94709957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05290044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050705735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38382137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401501975","doi":"10.1093/ajj/auae010","title":"Common Good Constitutionalism and the Individual—A Property Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Subordination (linguistics); Mainstream; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Function (biology); Law; Property rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.024929922603209524,"score_gpt":0.34408552478137633,"score_spread":0.3191556021781668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401501975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080805376,0.0047261068,0.1352413,0.08985555,0.00054630294,0.00013657403,0.000091284805,0.00009339173,0.68850416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98220426,0.000532768,0.0059737624,0.0030641323,0.00025029943,0.00006824161,0.00001688243,0.000026628673,0.007862925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799483,0.012523237,0.00046921824,0.0025977385,0.0027227027,0.0017387929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98250407,0.01109406,0.0010287542,0.00252331,0.0015358044,0.001314063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021589518,0.00041169891,0.00093603175,0.0023029626,0.0068105888,0.010688418,0.0019594736,0.00668748,0.0042090635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016730107,0.00035971674,0.0008770733,0.0012849083,0.08864185,0.0103494,0.007726079,0.008256431,0.00037233497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015391754,0.0000030181525,0.000035384866,0.0000039407287,0.0000012923191,0.0000102607055,0.0003289382,0.00007863124,0.000016998307,0.99899,0.000129521,0.00040054537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008528101,0.0000115693065,0.0000991188,0.000038084723,0.0000054816355,0.00002241539,0.0003484878,0.00030831998,0.00008146419,0.988891,0.010179227,0.0000063536077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041474113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036046475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021589518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007529749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005945597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114177644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401782410","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198852285.001.0001","title":"The Law of Rescission","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rescission; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04074136914957063,"score_gpt":0.2710036689802885,"score_spread":0.23026229983071786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401782410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002354824,0.0018718935,0.0041282773,0.0057112593,0.0003899862,0.000025899162,0.000054751556,0.00004473331,0.9854183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33125323,0.0030198286,0.001876392,0.006406352,0.0011994744,0.0002164991,0.00014107724,0.00013160997,0.6557556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946568,0.0013836208,0.00017748166,0.0006534898,0.0024282394,0.0007004169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979321,0.00088711816,0.000116049734,0.00041388182,0.00052686787,0.00012389297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026534495,0.00046887752,0.00056431396,0.0011013729,0.004903935,0.008775744,0.0015874208,0.005742738,0.019591423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008275358,0.0004393524,0.000539257,0.0009970688,0.01573491,0.005487226,0.004483593,0.0067350743,0.004720058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015859805,0.0000029955852,0.000021927595,0.000004389829,4.4604744e-7,0.000020690106,0.00017836472,0.000046756744,0.000016042404,0.99250895,0.0058423784,0.0013555299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008590856,0.0000137520765,0.00021805082,0.00018273694,0.0000047905737,0.00014596595,0.00043244386,0.0005994503,0.00017088356,0.60976577,0.38844383,0.00001378071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010251597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006531311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019591423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006512135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063923686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06553984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401783167","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198804918.003.0008","title":"Contractual Expropriation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03263408374053695,"score_gpt":0.2427027195930637,"score_spread":0.21006863585252675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401783167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034522342,0.005112889,0.013938334,0.0042177457,0.00047991038,0.0001122652,0.000088856184,0.00005177531,0.9725461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44536278,0.0135339005,0.012195917,0.005904078,0.0016388389,0.0007808601,0.00038243615,0.0001698019,0.5200314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272305,0.002033743,0.0004192989,0.000881048,0.0032077131,0.0007352664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964998,0.0014422706,0.00029463173,0.00088989065,0.00073610427,0.0001372837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004620553,0.00074147724,0.0005613661,0.0017001429,0.0033076701,0.0085187135,0.002037817,0.0037237548,0.022984924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008208537,0.0005219715,0.00074086984,0.0015666591,0.014782469,0.0070215967,0.0053166794,0.00649751,0.0054832175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002586941,0.000008420322,0.00003100984,0.000025071353,0.0000011014343,0.000048504848,0.00032354103,0.00012543342,0.000056290166,0.9875881,0.004427111,0.007362812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009757601,0.000030714244,0.00021086402,0.00057915703,0.0000059818713,0.00044106547,0.0005122496,0.00070146343,0.00038060747,0.47463328,0.52247345,0.000021386142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021549095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012730288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022984924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004624816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0768922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401928670","doi":"10.1093/9780191964718.001.0001","title":"Jurisprudence in the Mirror","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Comparative law; Law; Notice; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Philosophy of law; Legal history; Common law; Context (archaeology); Legal realism; Sociology; Public law; Geography","score_opus":0.043831411279698335,"score_gpt":0.3719950547043044,"score_spread":0.328163643424606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401928670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013900362,0.004054426,0.01673962,0.03453903,0.0017086163,0.00006149385,0.000029729055,0.00011383885,0.9288529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7679665,0.0025528825,0.0067059724,0.009060116,0.0012835377,0.00013140442,0.000058061207,0.0002522333,0.21198925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518085,0.0023733557,0.00015947835,0.00055187196,0.0013910289,0.0003435471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656266,0.0017822505,0.00015417936,0.00068263157,0.00062709104,0.00019110939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039756256,0.00026152396,0.00040860675,0.000781852,0.004244269,0.008436922,0.0010769562,0.002602034,0.0065737776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009407811,0.0002952092,0.00031882798,0.00067037705,0.01947933,0.007837362,0.004969141,0.0067103696,0.0013923468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002942558,0.0000052445366,0.000031970165,0.000009609141,7.335918e-7,0.000030068812,0.0022874319,0.00003560083,0.000059426715,0.9916992,0.0031290273,0.002708805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011663744,0.00002681445,0.00024717205,0.00016230899,0.000003993549,0.00016378227,0.0021605904,0.00054981234,0.00047284956,0.52552754,0.47066307,0.000010400388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025376421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017688846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008436922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058132317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003485595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042178094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402081838","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-61565-8_2","title":"The Disabled Contract: A Précis","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œInternational Library of Bioethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.06174339726033484,"score_gpt":0.32204339838260043,"score_spread":0.2603000011222656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402081838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012622159,0.07051834,0.0024321529,0.2623176,0.020906752,0.00008503154,0.00019336327,0.00005796927,0.6422266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02207555,0.03145273,0.0017241028,0.117854476,0.01361034,0.00020096255,0.00015603303,0.0001213748,0.8128044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818486,0.0005987178,0.00007774879,0.00012888304,0.00073042716,0.0002794333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787927,0.0012600858,0.000058388126,0.00016042737,0.00038285498,0.00025899927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030990704,0.0006287178,0.000596741,0.0021614805,0.0045313626,0.009531894,0.0017334182,0.014445918,0.018991563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057715992,0.00044891454,0.00047458278,0.0015003284,0.010062515,0.010177964,0.004477831,0.0077318093,0.0060125804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055962273,0.000025085455,0.00005330817,0.00006341111,0.0000012426309,0.000054250715,0.00067951577,0.000032892483,0.000032478812,0.43547076,0.54203665,0.021544827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030842177,0.0000049031564,0.00007433667,0.00020623332,0.0000011985145,0.0000680206,0.00040205344,0.000025651507,0.00001974079,0.0481206,0.95106906,0.0000050513654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018546976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044033635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018991563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005622702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010234822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06353307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402448089","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2024.2392371","title":"The Case for Fiduciary Duties in Public Law or when Public Law Duties are not Enough …","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Public law; Political science; Business; Duty","score_opus":0.16772162785650016,"score_gpt":0.39804062913449695,"score_spread":0.2303190012779968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402448089","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065378672,0.009629345,0.0036756187,0.666251,0.005647478,0.000037106573,0.00010369862,0.00008991673,0.30802798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4279985,0.0047178236,0.0041169235,0.4374428,0.009228948,0.0001693843,0.00011526575,0.00019429433,0.11601601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760933,0.009723605,0.00069776294,0.0034179825,0.0058221323,0.0042452333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97924346,0.012421368,0.001846393,0.0020001563,0.003449786,0.0010388368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020449165,0.00044823613,0.0007650808,0.0009170509,0.012364834,0.01129829,0.001987725,0.025704034,0.011286707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052076638,0.0007456981,0.0006456095,0.0008747489,0.032750037,0.014111736,0.004740529,0.02037418,0.0041100895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001536422,0.0000079127985,0.00015835938,0.000040073788,0.0000056068257,0.00009280109,0.0013970144,0.000019006506,0.00008833407,0.82334065,0.1709771,0.0038576797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023632943,0.00002036141,0.00090181135,0.00041463738,0.00001780704,0.00040418576,0.002285169,0.00015942939,0.00037402983,0.41261366,0.58273405,0.00005120596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011419485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021831341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025704034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057906224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01160883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10814679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402869651","doi":"10.5040/9781509966936","title":"Administrative Tribunals in the Common Law World","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10570220025414463,"score_gpt":0.3694603934179583,"score_spread":0.26375819316381366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402869651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006204343,0.010436299,0.0011471716,0.009566499,0.0012758913,0.000026535872,0.000029573022,0.00006233371,0.97125137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24602868,0.009015076,0.0014967826,0.0038998905,0.0009992454,0.00009397623,0.00012416179,0.00015819694,0.7381841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997776,0.0008758536,0.00006122977,0.00016553164,0.0007050311,0.0004163575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895966,0.0003562037,0.0000890799,0.00012816915,0.00024070985,0.00022616115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011517939,0.00029020096,0.00030205393,0.0012931696,0.009526156,0.017025938,0.001075783,0.0016335625,0.01191135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026049563,0.00028177764,0.00029551837,0.0030357577,0.011073262,0.005821621,0.004607203,0.0033845585,0.0031887386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022765553,0.000008055141,0.00015071772,0.000024862224,0.0000011086107,0.00005790997,0.008615203,0.00008047006,0.000033403336,0.90763247,0.06702315,0.016370477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020481812,0.0000064052465,0.0005989628,0.00011876945,0.000002178143,0.000065241606,0.010096934,0.00012575061,0.000037299327,0.049111307,0.9398289,0.0000062478293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021247733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037825953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021247733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072785374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008030498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052809715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085671","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0021","title":"Unjust enrichment in law and equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Equity (law); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Restitution","score_opus":0.021927008087945787,"score_gpt":0.3043307091853372,"score_spread":0.28240370109739144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06380742,0.012495965,0.024000261,0.095535256,0.00057266344,0.0000904482,0.00006112781,0.00007301856,0.8033637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602719,0.0016451533,0.0015557619,0.015440098,0.00049686217,0.000097713855,0.000023033952,0.000024687088,0.020444874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99290293,0.003269793,0.0002372763,0.00087570935,0.0012920047,0.0014221529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972391,0.001631836,0.00027559555,0.00029072154,0.00029482332,0.00026792154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006659916,0.00036360446,0.00046877962,0.0011638203,0.006832272,0.0079579055,0.0011353537,0.0058446247,0.0036817745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008210365,0.0003501689,0.00040404004,0.0007858872,0.049865622,0.009749552,0.006774293,0.006231625,0.00033569318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020555376,0.000003013379,0.0000786921,0.0000039894862,6.7378085e-7,0.000018410168,0.00041883573,0.00004800805,0.000016281507,0.9979304,0.0005857115,0.00089386303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009290965,0.000011822566,0.00030952212,0.000075431526,0.00000292518,0.00003919484,0.0005584692,0.00023683185,0.00013438279,0.96427643,0.03433731,0.000008295313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133343795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010550006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0133343795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007925042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065388405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05750054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403154934","doi":"10.59295/sum3(173)2024_09","title":"The ways of creating a trust","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Universitatis Moldaviae Seria Stiinte Sociale","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030177047914825478,"score_gpt":0.29516960528391084,"score_spread":0.26499255736908534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403154934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06082362,0.0064831683,0.1767614,0.09915013,0.0013876405,0.00035031815,0.00009909413,0.00031377652,0.6546308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621819,0.0013069189,0.015086443,0.002893852,0.00026887617,0.0002826537,0.000033271335,0.00010777404,0.017838286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9468953,0.036370277,0.0018494205,0.0040559135,0.006738747,0.004090314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97684985,0.010257717,0.002954083,0.0055375537,0.0022888288,0.0021119935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029771758,0.0009246423,0.00065807905,0.0036926405,0.017626025,0.02348693,0.0021379874,0.0074395156,0.004941309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028650863,0.001042819,0.001125295,0.00249595,0.07856109,0.027559126,0.020789608,0.0074190157,0.0012337422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004101586,0.0000057306897,0.00018705204,0.000014882279,0.0000039434262,0.000060988077,0.009512609,0.00006756349,0.000041307387,0.9866093,0.00071304495,0.0027794016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024855148,0.00003743942,0.00035680615,0.00024776184,0.00001367065,0.00025137136,0.012253193,0.00035326302,0.00021763655,0.8085274,0.17767435,0.000042198135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064705946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005407457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029771758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010889306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011680617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15745002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403766022","doi":"10.5040/9781509972173","title":"Wards of Court and the Inherent Jurisdiction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02636887584373398,"score_gpt":0.2846157908997691,"score_spread":0.25824691505603514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403766022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011146361,0.012842592,0.0106960125,0.038070925,0.0019192921,0.00004483428,0.0000804462,0.00006807479,0.92513156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76265687,0.009031518,0.005148331,0.016670529,0.002541639,0.000118823875,0.00013082137,0.00015398716,0.20354755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932006,0.0031051429,0.00026193686,0.0005356542,0.0020862557,0.0008103784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966349,0.0020708814,0.00021532545,0.0003452461,0.0005103477,0.00022329956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002502206,0.0002817669,0.00037716856,0.00082295743,0.0056211394,0.011199519,0.0013011073,0.002987352,0.008013161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008234003,0.00045414252,0.0003975724,0.0011286509,0.02349342,0.008225386,0.0044480185,0.0071519595,0.0012124007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021318117,0.000002529779,0.00006292892,0.000017472998,0.0000012328217,0.00005011555,0.0024445937,0.000059725993,0.000032879903,0.9809147,0.012418183,0.0039934157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008062906,0.000017264845,0.00067029893,0.00038239168,0.0000060404504,0.0003127773,0.004657487,0.00039401688,0.00015931271,0.47782835,0.51554036,0.00002366024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009960635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014013625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011199519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005779186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060190926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041931152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404169466","doi":"10.1163/15685284-bja10099","title":"Aristotle’s Nature-Bound Theology in Metaphysics Λ","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phronesis","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ancient philosophy; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016870224562729495,"score_gpt":0.34957237073251596,"score_spread":0.33270214616978644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404169466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03040361,0.010324409,0.16351603,0.05903323,0.0015100307,0.0000900015,0.00023473249,0.00017393254,0.734714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92589587,0.0027918199,0.023952851,0.005565338,0.0014568684,0.00017412625,0.00007365246,0.000079442805,0.04001013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978981,0.001078826,0.000078882724,0.00023153237,0.0005789399,0.00013369073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987494,0.0006894057,0.000091452705,0.00014624822,0.00024370485,0.000079853155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027227534,0.00042154576,0.00050624757,0.0017889871,0.0032251717,0.0042036567,0.0008867143,0.003051317,0.0034157012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002698978,0.0003437367,0.00048938644,0.0010331923,0.028881678,0.005513001,0.0018784299,0.0052020214,0.0007319716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016990964,0.000002307483,0.000010028537,0.0000054822717,7.7719636e-7,0.000006839377,0.00020000307,0.00007709232,0.000018525567,0.99872845,0.00050276524,0.0004461478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003812119,0.0000029659666,0.000035767225,0.00001192354,7.8503393e-7,0.0000064529977,0.00006361765,0.00021417605,0.000026531141,0.9912061,0.008425085,0.0000027431645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056850873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029161493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006202209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006202209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002531864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045000374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330247","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.009","title":"In Defense of the State’s Fiduciary Duties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; State (computer science); Law; Business; Political science; Duty; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.024935074936508466,"score_gpt":0.2360339189131587,"score_spread":0.21109884397665024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023492333,0.0054702973,0.0026419777,0.017494228,0.00069419097,0.000014490164,0.00002110922,0.00002719763,0.97128737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2334132,0.008606897,0.0041592414,0.01629535,0.0011570104,0.00013815712,0.00008069193,0.000101466554,0.736048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988071,0.00045214818,0.000032093478,0.00012277067,0.0004310188,0.00015490226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947613,0.00029067177,0.00002650786,0.00005950105,0.000118220196,0.000029017558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001684576,0.00031080836,0.0002718512,0.00069170864,0.003570022,0.004070735,0.00077075575,0.0025254197,0.008032355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020641899,0.00022562836,0.00020452583,0.00066803,0.0116112325,0.0031425743,0.001862977,0.0060975566,0.0023808617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.655198e-7,0.000003095881,0.000013189309,0.0000069018356,2.887849e-7,0.000008904202,0.0006921046,0.00003381265,0.00002026474,0.9849878,0.011104904,0.0031278434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003559405,0.000005703411,0.00014229064,0.0001529419,0.000001911861,0.000052065294,0.00069922546,0.00019997706,0.00014276052,0.2567022,0.7418917,0.0000056344643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007896496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015545042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008032355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046088547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046209455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033439755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330442","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.010","title":"Fulfilling the State’s Fiduciary Duties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; State (computer science); Business; Law; Political science; Computer science; Duty; Programming language","score_opus":0.03287540301741708,"score_gpt":0.240391373743545,"score_spread":0.20751597072612793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076245433,0.00195599,0.009623544,0.013089042,0.0003323005,0.000040186394,0.000044064625,0.000049158578,0.96724117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6219228,0.004827086,0.009715772,0.00723931,0.00047110926,0.00019795484,0.000097928416,0.00010341676,0.35542464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880886,0.00044909006,0.000037955357,0.00010342023,0.0003772406,0.00022351043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993162,0.0003334998,0.000043760047,0.00010146048,0.00014732177,0.00005776828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001870125,0.00029121287,0.00028948774,0.00064842484,0.0035238387,0.005445524,0.0007300966,0.002231684,0.007862321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026380923,0.00016902237,0.00031448834,0.0005967382,0.013111729,0.0034846195,0.0029595937,0.0039459784,0.0016779564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.149705e-7,0.0000032649004,0.000032667744,0.0000062213953,3.0414856e-7,0.000009559266,0.0010392041,0.000040793188,0.000027761133,0.99222285,0.0031728407,0.0034435636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000560767,0.000013048536,0.000339711,0.00018990024,0.00000420213,0.00008383568,0.0021177188,0.00045391425,0.00045536636,0.61715484,0.37916866,0.000013157864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008781798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013862455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008781798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041592843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005465624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030177891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330589","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.012","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404360679","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.18","title":"<i>Freedom Under the Private Law</i> Allan Beever","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Allan variance; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027153196812584712,"score_gpt":0.30937677465607993,"score_spread":0.2822235778434952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404360679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001863557,0.037788495,0.0012545381,0.32236952,0.0050948267,0.000028072796,0.00021540125,0.00007085798,0.6313147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10545711,0.027742842,0.0016208785,0.09694727,0.002284553,0.0000706762,0.00017133231,0.00019732345,0.765508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991634,0.00020021464,0.000029864214,0.00012517716,0.00034822675,0.00013306741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990932,0.00051775685,0.000041761505,0.000050614086,0.0001807413,0.00011584311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009731761,0.00028458115,0.00032845334,0.0005054869,0.005934143,0.0041580833,0.0007066288,0.0041585104,0.018882629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028341329,0.00026534463,0.00021150953,0.00067011453,0.004694305,0.0046527907,0.0014021765,0.0051062577,0.0035146852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008743526,0.000004874699,0.00007391037,0.00004126423,0.0000017571807,0.000046929017,0.00070436107,0.00004103822,0.00007921073,0.36543396,0.62530965,0.008254264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040010473,0.0000030244319,0.0004931791,0.00015234391,0.0000026778937,0.0000679528,0.00062629685,0.000074645504,0.00019691112,0.076221436,0.92214566,0.00001195235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10770605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25608122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10770605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057039056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005233385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21415824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404420367","doi":"10.1163/15685284-bja10100","title":"Aristotle on Ownership","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phronesis","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ancient philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0509518763406202,"score_gpt":0.3642033199475626,"score_spread":0.3132514436069424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404420367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00982925,0.008906027,0.021942388,0.032751262,0.0013260883,0.000039410283,0.000135005,0.000058025955,0.92501247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8460073,0.006238601,0.007996539,0.014197169,0.002252735,0.00017174955,0.000115995084,0.0001085081,0.12291142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728775,0.0011519796,0.00010094273,0.0004128908,0.0007571831,0.0002893096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985733,0.0007169172,0.000073485506,0.00019915213,0.00035086443,0.00008631321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029692745,0.00043525052,0.0005447644,0.001274912,0.0044564307,0.0040428382,0.0005736683,0.0029712021,0.0057759676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003515841,0.0002723259,0.00039741272,0.0007007425,0.024910357,0.006518579,0.0024252743,0.005106195,0.0013295333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021716096,0.0000014713112,0.0000124818025,0.000003859045,6.571864e-7,0.000009005802,0.00021949482,0.00003959335,0.000009236292,0.99722207,0.0017274996,0.0007524465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053721446,0.0000049888663,0.00004229777,0.00003806362,0.0000015722152,0.000015518037,0.00012527444,0.000119570075,0.00003585895,0.9504447,0.04916255,0.0000041177445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006807451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037437591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006807451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045967866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022624407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033352137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469144","doi":"10.29173/alr2791","title":"Unfinished Business in Unwritten Justice: Unwritten Constitutional Principles After Toronto (City) v. Ontario (Attorney General)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0377460199084243,"score_gpt":0.32757355510274916,"score_spread":0.28982753519432486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08094278,0.044457372,0.0064008613,0.31653094,0.0030076907,0.00024086252,0.0006798188,0.00009005547,0.5476496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80582494,0.0089002345,0.0030020636,0.06714217,0.00061295414,0.000081238504,0.00014332538,0.00005981532,0.11423331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913396,0.0015482199,0.00027963414,0.0009947184,0.0032915554,0.0025462303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994787,0.0026418318,0.00024552882,0.00026998925,0.0014948872,0.000560834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008626111,0.00032462736,0.0004229344,0.0010651828,0.016109169,0.010579464,0.00203361,0.009455961,0.0021868309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009348733,0.00053660513,0.0005272839,0.0017546352,0.027850162,0.0027299903,0.0019010277,0.008808532,0.000253437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001242861,0.0000074784784,0.00084859534,0.00005948173,0.0000093565795,0.00037383195,0.011579129,0.00027666707,0.00026670806,0.9526636,0.02739765,0.006505007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004237484,0.000030305486,0.008112331,0.0004722418,0.00006465768,0.00017778463,0.011662182,0.00052394334,0.000931016,0.106051445,0.87177205,0.00015964608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97774154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99133974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13168195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13168195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14376001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9554239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696533","doi":"10.7202/1114749ar","title":"Debt, Deals, and Dominion: Insights on Canadian Insolvency Law from Debt and Federalism by Thomas G.W. Telfer and Virginia Torrie","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Dominion; Debt; Federalism; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.019887758426220873,"score_gpt":0.2977578292982002,"score_spread":0.27787007087197935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696533","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013084956,0.32259884,0.0011745922,0.38405275,0.0019145967,0.00006988055,0.0013840989,0.00003981355,0.27568036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38800198,0.41952962,0.0018584209,0.039648175,0.0018865278,0.00010465223,0.00088725047,0.0000965652,0.1479868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959182,0.0004608773,0.000108805485,0.00021797018,0.0024067776,0.0008875124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938883,0.0022445738,0.0002582029,0.0001232658,0.0029174022,0.00056837883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026375405,0.00062301947,0.00064839364,0.006566669,0.016103668,0.010753738,0.001468905,0.004329771,0.008788973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008739727,0.0005846892,0.0006069061,0.013295139,0.012669141,0.0045082816,0.0024024781,0.005189435,0.0006202314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025527648,0.0000148183235,0.0021122508,0.00024455984,0.000017366525,0.00022487856,0.0061563104,0.0005584441,0.00011527571,0.6324063,0.33077168,0.027352646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016953902,0.000008811797,0.012336691,0.0013038141,0.00004341842,0.000112354704,0.008165245,0.00066621084,0.00014808151,0.11078758,0.8662846,0.000126085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98569554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14232205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14232205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15078168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99478483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404743174","doi":"10.1080/24751448.2024.2405413","title":"A-legal Architecture: Ordinances and Subdivided Units in Hong Kong","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology|Architecture + Design","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02603087701875569,"score_gpt":0.29516746262429877,"score_spread":0.2691365856055431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404743174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984469,0.0001864719,0.0002810282,0.00044970892,0.0000098347355,0.000012598316,0.000023379525,0.0000037554007,0.014564236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952349,0.00012435453,0.00014993554,0.000040952855,9.851917e-7,0.0000056753156,0.000011285733,0.0000024567707,0.004429439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999323,0.0002945847,0.000049910013,0.000079216705,0.000074320895,0.00017897719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989778,0.0003933033,0.00020535197,0.00009788841,0.0001434117,0.00018242361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011439997,0.00017171032,0.00017882581,0.00070564996,0.0055536446,0.0030813285,0.0005306385,0.00044246914,0.0030026583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014626231,0.00025599278,0.00016124602,0.0021295932,0.0061428878,0.0014097529,0.001961163,0.0006889809,0.00015934357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014541685,0.00022814327,0.21839106,0.0002443844,0.000040385465,0.007840426,0.55308366,0.002386224,0.0012701515,0.1701002,0.0034680637,0.04280183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019193676,0.00015615522,0.21824028,0.00025748074,0.000039989096,0.00055078196,0.6884871,0.0033283755,0.0008105797,0.0064189197,0.08162504,0.000066138826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53387976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6749417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53387976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018816104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00865852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9377306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404989094","doi":"10.1017/9781009562942.023","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404989094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404989262","doi":"10.1017/9781108779791.020","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404989262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405015405","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4981926","title":"Looking through Trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.01534307937477636,"score_gpt":0.33052893278312157,"score_spread":0.3151858534083452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405015405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118230395,0.0040861694,0.03837779,0.119343795,0.0009093024,0.00006417531,0.00045875943,0.0001851344,0.7183444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636715,0.000874913,0.0022234179,0.0023687577,0.0001588292,0.000022855042,0.00007676993,0.00009836006,0.030504532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430615,0.002611645,0.00022921691,0.00083549524,0.0010805278,0.0009369685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97533876,0.011626524,0.003235791,0.003799936,0.0037589136,0.0022401146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059595634,0.0003861615,0.0007025627,0.0022828965,0.0061340705,0.011611357,0.0011446308,0.005127914,0.03620724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045639616,0.00053305255,0.0006968251,0.0025758091,0.013038475,0.03426221,0.004970316,0.0069260527,0.002899963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030043022,0.000013011353,0.0019123837,0.000036900656,0.000014643839,0.00016744863,0.0043240567,0.00014480337,0.000050348306,0.97714615,0.0069331275,0.009227061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091268475,0.000015259573,0.0009814351,0.00010096669,0.000018732491,0.00017149544,0.007513232,0.0006982146,0.000114775255,0.9534353,0.03692376,0.000017733857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011053927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008387434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03620724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005188573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030189524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12112522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405268129","doi":"10.1017/9781009475075.010","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405268129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078779436,0.008925671,0.002827921,0.0101019405,0.0150431,0.0012003566,0.15957722,0.0034524226,0.79808366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025068284,0.009668184,0.0015798341,0.001826964,0.004499327,0.0005958463,0.07539415,0.0009863498,0.90294266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853456,0.00011612091,0.00020681828,0.0001689169,0.00086148066,0.00011223591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928121,0.00077803986,0.00041937613,0.00049740396,0.0048369598,0.0006561745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001032927,0.0010944256,0.001025997,0.008741437,0.0014082977,0.0058060074,0.0014221098,0.0009001983,0.73285526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010779289,0.00043974505,0.00056683656,0.01036257,0.00038304908,0.0035213516,0.0016818935,0.0012844611,0.64022017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015942982,0.000010094525,0.00007949188,0.0003524322,0.000001738421,0.000015262278,0.00002348794,0.00005330108,0.0000843264,0.0012934783,0.9525428,0.04552771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029065598,0.000008655185,0.00033198643,0.00020181904,0.000001897423,0.000014458675,0.000027932301,0.000014222098,0.00004930295,0.00064976397,0.99869305,0.0000040121427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007473408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26714474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023006322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003269969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405315495","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-11945-4_356-1","title":"Address to the Opposers of the Repeal of the Corporation and Test Acts by Anna Barbauld","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Corporation; Test (biology); Political science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.029792382879048087,"score_gpt":0.2819853102982524,"score_spread":0.25219292741920435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405315495","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008684583,0.026377296,0.00038614913,0.6545954,0.02227948,0.0000289988,0.00010222317,0.000052577994,0.2953094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013226383,0.0044934093,0.0002963821,0.21162793,0.003431932,0.000052553118,0.00002481444,0.000107418055,0.76673925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627006,0.0010922123,0.00009853111,0.00050312054,0.0013947882,0.0006412713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960461,0.0023599158,0.00015409182,0.00012407299,0.0009029416,0.00041286135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031133667,0.000745593,0.0010903318,0.0012731774,0.016192287,0.0085951425,0.0019501472,0.019963795,0.02945024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010759831,0.00072595844,0.0005974732,0.00080683787,0.0052306824,0.004249564,0.003332661,0.026317975,0.011424223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062559825,0.0000073011333,0.00004000487,0.00002024037,0.000002603935,0.0000564915,0.00064121373,0.000023751203,0.00005746479,0.07562756,0.91998893,0.0035280818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003011453,0.0000038749845,0.00012396646,0.00008714231,0.0000032145406,0.000039623614,0.00062288286,0.000030524756,0.00006279679,0.0040834253,0.9949291,0.000010458589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05272777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.117019065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05272777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064335135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006191068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10484171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405532270","doi":"10.1017/9781009437042.008","title":"Dignity in the Courtroom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Administration of justice; Administration (probate law); Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.03996141267769911,"score_gpt":0.2568567600860056,"score_spread":0.21689534740830652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405532270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018858299,0.011151623,0.0055519682,0.02357198,0.00045464654,0.000055107434,0.000061893224,0.000040728533,0.94025373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77677095,0.009448762,0.0043243375,0.0060411463,0.00024258341,0.00006529822,0.00008671737,0.000050723094,0.20296946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734396,0.00049848214,0.00006129976,0.000244475,0.0013416383,0.0005101145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992737,0.00019399876,0.000034743538,0.00006167993,0.0002209134,0.0002148833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021075346,0.0003798514,0.00043161504,0.0012918992,0.009464196,0.010408815,0.0013674997,0.0025344205,0.0070317476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027663342,0.0001845254,0.00022369175,0.0009523401,0.043689545,0.00469833,0.00485471,0.0035833146,0.0007677488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003722355,0.000006134984,0.00012135985,0.000021579064,0.0000012563445,0.000090651505,0.009048629,0.00009393331,0.0001778169,0.9730601,0.003880831,0.013494071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007939745,0.000030234945,0.0014512469,0.00056332594,0.0000070795236,0.00025279296,0.012928531,0.00023831188,0.0003585693,0.5140118,0.47011393,0.000036259105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33642247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37552297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33642247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023678252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026004713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66892856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406772881","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000295","title":"In Defence of the Best Interest Standard: A Fiduciary Duty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law and economics; General interest; Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04427447358406672,"score_gpt":0.34110546627080224,"score_spread":0.2968309926867355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406772881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013952965,0.002763459,0.024230419,0.6512131,0.002330964,0.000066736466,0.00008926954,0.00006687408,0.30528626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78716487,0.0011837896,0.011735227,0.16568376,0.0013710831,0.00012565427,0.00005058208,0.00011223088,0.03257289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9537793,0.020755839,0.0018210904,0.0040840544,0.01514966,0.004410072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95488214,0.026679698,0.0021626824,0.0034391114,0.010578323,0.0022580747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045934975,0.0005478455,0.0011161658,0.0016366177,0.01469032,0.017288385,0.004074379,0.020660982,0.0039238185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06550582,0.0005196646,0.0007755355,0.0016101013,0.07446013,0.00927915,0.008152523,0.02863196,0.0008716152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029896312,0.0000030367805,0.00006477226,0.000008163962,0.0000020265584,0.000020310637,0.0018025143,0.00004013893,0.000026004544,0.99062514,0.0062634596,0.0011413039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022571821,0.000016479979,0.00040094877,0.00038137895,0.000017180713,0.00008546614,0.005278431,0.00070008583,0.00030506635,0.7812724,0.211461,0.00005894822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23733062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19790758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23733062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034659162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0648729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47189838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406773064","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000246","title":"Anscombe's Philosophy of Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04687924707172604,"score_gpt":0.33643425235361507,"score_spread":0.28955500528188904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406773064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056918124,0.007955589,0.025109436,0.10107195,0.0009886455,0.000044895463,0.00007125229,0.000045479897,0.85902107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7718754,0.0070798127,0.01827572,0.02102694,0.0013305575,0.00029744665,0.000047791626,0.000070663526,0.17999564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944068,0.0034886724,0.00015384407,0.0006639422,0.0010502491,0.00023637175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969022,0.0019413201,0.00014072469,0.00028456055,0.0005058396,0.00022548751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004717946,0.00040061548,0.000508605,0.0013455964,0.004963583,0.0064452896,0.0009894996,0.004418231,0.0055790865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005521797,0.00032391632,0.00033852085,0.0008592252,0.03274214,0.006604522,0.0036086126,0.005990782,0.00071720674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.484845e-7,0.000001461836,0.000006982588,0.0000033068004,3.4677137e-7,0.0000050016124,0.00025978108,0.000031405543,0.0000074668365,0.9979102,0.0012671199,0.00050647417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040557247,0.0000031417028,0.000040686267,0.000037292728,0.0000011561758,0.000017903281,0.00019972528,0.00020834975,0.000020342912,0.93063724,0.06882697,0.000003251171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010806779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065040416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010806779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064940997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043329666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047118247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967564","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1572","title":"Overbreadth Revisited","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03170321817163785,"score_gpt":0.3405854726422747,"score_spread":0.30888225447063683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018750785,0.008047982,0.007937057,0.046060782,0.0017066646,0.00003489247,0.00011652263,0.000052924002,0.9172924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7052042,0.004374058,0.0035366337,0.060023535,0.0016308662,0.00018163296,0.00017302705,0.00021626649,0.22465983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893995,0.0030477927,0.00035813,0.0022615255,0.002860205,0.0020729348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649966,0.0014217922,0.00021848966,0.00068186043,0.0008439098,0.00033426477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072624306,0.0006022138,0.0006930583,0.0020486729,0.012352629,0.009384288,0.0023418774,0.007387109,0.014125164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011142811,0.00044455533,0.0008861772,0.0018405207,0.033360973,0.010713152,0.007265491,0.01828537,0.0017541393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004813332,0.0000032553326,0.000073163756,0.000008173375,0.0000014940473,0.000030884235,0.0012989593,0.00002874017,0.000023467428,0.99206626,0.0038124141,0.002648233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020847345,0.000020036407,0.0006690443,0.00031137836,0.000011409456,0.0002277719,0.0026236195,0.00024379701,0.00025350394,0.5996549,0.3959359,0.000027836903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07066504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06670913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07066504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0153808165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010504262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14050746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407073763","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2025.2455999","title":"On the possibility of a normative account of corporate trust","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"University of Oxford; Bentley University","keywords":"Normative; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Accounting; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.09475618315004518,"score_gpt":0.3709227541955655,"score_spread":0.2761665710455203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407073763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04772658,0.0017498457,0.12917258,0.10031384,0.00039147597,0.00006206022,0.00013145745,0.00011913546,0.72033304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97963345,0.000578643,0.0056889644,0.003151822,0.00036614793,0.000097370845,0.000062729654,0.00003744402,0.01038348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314594,0.0034491746,0.00027068582,0.0008125374,0.0015681206,0.0007536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872207,0.006785689,0.0011895321,0.0019515965,0.0020335014,0.00081886747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009236948,0.0004217618,0.0005764771,0.0018354807,0.0038116176,0.010739178,0.0019241881,0.0056672716,0.0059308554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017471487,0.00027216162,0.00071520417,0.0014888077,0.021263909,0.017211197,0.003978633,0.004932698,0.00085870543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014021979,0.0000029021455,0.000045404944,0.0000029106268,7.5012315e-7,0.000012084803,0.00019356386,0.0001025639,0.000008921251,0.9990152,0.00020129721,0.00041300233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025513011,0.0000025440318,0.000070141796,0.000011922619,0.0000013787909,0.000017228076,0.00013885227,0.0006237951,0.00001921973,0.9955384,0.0035712114,0.000002752381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002660866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024317433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010739178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004336008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003127748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04885024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407292996","doi":"10.31124/advance.173917491.11218139/v1","title":"Hidden ownership, asymmetrical information, and multidecadal contractual obligations at Saskatchewan’s first public-private partnership long-term care home","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Term (time); Business; Private information retrieval; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.03499618664248422,"score_gpt":0.3142954325499163,"score_spread":0.2792992459074321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407292996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62039137,0.13281406,0.008666913,0.077806704,0.000509947,0.0008567263,0.013149243,0.000050080176,0.14575496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96186167,0.024282936,0.0052172514,0.0041894293,0.00003132735,0.00031597776,0.0013904664,0.000012182346,0.0026988669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.983354,0.0076758573,0.002146419,0.0010168275,0.0039641424,0.0018427671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170161,0.056705046,0.008128062,0.00327344,0.012942886,0.0019345393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02118072,0.00017974773,0.0004998006,0.0052191997,0.005524217,0.0064700707,0.001763898,0.0009906533,0.003269001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067240685,0.00034559076,0.0006629387,0.013175143,0.005219967,0.004217242,0.0039529754,0.0014420933,0.00011146054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030065895,0.00010638594,0.24389876,0.015912848,0.00077577465,0.003733903,0.08473871,0.0021360035,0.0005481673,0.31949985,0.032239817,0.29610908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012660757,0.0001150669,0.3101944,0.08463683,0.0013873981,0.0013297659,0.21610366,0.0019091374,0.0016836643,0.07308204,0.30912122,0.00031022288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90123314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96366686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09876686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07101501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15840882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51525235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407592698","doi":"10.1007/s10790-025-10033-0","title":"Two Guises of the Good in Anscombe","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.046804618154786884,"score_gpt":0.3941098705881471,"score_spread":0.34730525243336025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407592698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011083292,0.0038388148,0.023639485,0.13197018,0.0015177748,0.000061874816,0.000061366314,0.000096080585,0.8277312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6453453,0.0019405865,0.01630546,0.027609732,0.0014027691,0.00030969124,0.000041899322,0.0003599494,0.30668464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907252,0.005337763,0.00021088775,0.0009676332,0.0016717131,0.0010867458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899871,0.0060130437,0.00027379234,0.0016353216,0.0011887158,0.00090194494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009376849,0.0005292403,0.0010052468,0.0021270118,0.012135605,0.016887547,0.0015436654,0.009221155,0.015474562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02081628,0.00057616044,0.00058398215,0.0019078836,0.062607676,0.020376043,0.007629008,0.013071707,0.0018829842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002779493,0.000002552042,0.000024397044,0.0000022795405,4.8986914e-7,0.000008366753,0.00068595464,0.0000132046425,0.000004631227,0.9952786,0.003068522,0.00090820424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000558545,0.0000041719027,0.00009366389,0.000030579704,0.0000016297023,0.000031417097,0.0012334909,0.00015396919,0.00004721242,0.9397724,0.058614455,0.0000115429975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02118751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03975512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02118751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078959055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006295833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057289064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407687506","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2025.510105","title":"Fiduciary-Republican Property","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Property (philosophy); Business; Accounting; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Duty","score_opus":0.051517728122293424,"score_gpt":0.38095882956608185,"score_spread":0.3294411014437884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407687506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0864773,0.0028693676,0.035481896,0.036870264,0.00030966583,0.000040572162,0.00011975423,0.00006866421,0.8377625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782139,0.00045046132,0.0022365062,0.0013462123,0.00011896023,0.000025394414,0.000024621986,0.000021696607,0.0175623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721235,0.0010669847,0.00010647834,0.00062343804,0.0006132907,0.00037739845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976586,0.0008905743,0.00028147397,0.0006133691,0.00043459763,0.000121341334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039103003,0.00015598875,0.00033254878,0.0010743974,0.00312582,0.005835383,0.0011055988,0.0020014446,0.0043108016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005720545,0.00016573556,0.00029486432,0.0010008762,0.042982712,0.0066842157,0.00321809,0.003600743,0.00047256897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012809686,0.0000017688141,0.000048064914,0.0000027972815,3.888961e-7,0.000007927003,0.0005235578,0.00002635391,0.000016676377,0.99839526,0.0002682951,0.000707604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005257213,0.000012254995,0.00043365336,0.000071923576,0.0000035014414,0.00006643862,0.0010761326,0.00043866594,0.00023149382,0.91249853,0.08515239,0.000009737976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068377233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006547259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068377233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062797884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046531577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04556322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407752663","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5143331","title":"Waiving Conditions Precedent","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009308570487569561,"score_gpt":0.33352512192614525,"score_spread":0.3242165514385757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407752663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006248979,0.0014326642,0.006154465,0.022167835,0.0018434004,0.00017036225,0.00040023297,0.00013246169,0.9614497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36930338,0.0015432814,0.0056506796,0.041999105,0.00269746,0.0007474537,0.0005444969,0.00037368093,0.5771405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833444,0.0026890286,0.0009671664,0.004347414,0.0048208483,0.0038311023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98849595,0.005368667,0.0005564243,0.0026075018,0.0024207712,0.00055075745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010303621,0.00078680064,0.001546943,0.002538853,0.012069451,0.015261487,0.0043894537,0.024025483,0.053593062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03508255,0.0013740453,0.0015847886,0.0014807512,0.013116092,0.011839763,0.006143511,0.021721916,0.015200145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018053168,0.000021020878,0.00011516651,0.000022067878,0.0000069330213,0.00011477399,0.00067228556,0.000059816703,0.00012992321,0.97513026,0.019976132,0.0037336003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043911525,0.000035210083,0.0006698461,0.000365835,0.000038203165,0.00021825056,0.0010025403,0.0002797106,0.00071886193,0.5819197,0.41464308,0.000064853964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026689885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031297464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053593062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006753208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017019387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17928666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407824335","doi":"10.63188/gpa1","title":"Disbursing Charity: What is the Duty of Foundations to the Canadian Nonprofit Sector?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Grant Professionals Association","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Nonprofit sector; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06136183962177603,"score_gpt":0.36979394320184206,"score_spread":0.308432103580066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407824335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020174453,0.0052937414,0.00044307805,0.92681783,0.0011828166,0.0000396196,0.00010194567,0.00002399194,0.045922544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7420817,0.010770068,0.0017307597,0.2117695,0.00085470226,0.00007558206,0.000095817515,0.000058113426,0.032563657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96635234,0.0058813766,0.0005784675,0.0016128141,0.011978195,0.01359688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.870258,0.025782406,0.0066104243,0.0025098752,0.049533598,0.045305807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029589633,0.00047796685,0.0008908407,0.0032533957,0.036907084,0.028553898,0.0055398676,0.018649628,0.008382419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10890402,0.0006290762,0.00073166826,0.0044934223,0.038346037,0.011178368,0.008176487,0.015942829,0.0007792625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007241316,0.00011835048,0.011353688,0.00043842124,0.00006107169,0.0004480541,0.03281473,0.00029754758,0.0003145448,0.5944866,0.3079416,0.05165295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010931138,0.000070058304,0.048797008,0.004187592,0.00017874273,0.0004550797,0.17485571,0.0011669793,0.00049162266,0.1314335,0.63775015,0.0005043226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98956466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14789492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14789492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5119961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407934253","doi":"10.21991/cf29484","title":"Ontario’s Ag-Gag Law, Where do Things Stand?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Art","score_opus":0.01628257739348415,"score_gpt":0.28987895374662537,"score_spread":0.2735963763531412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407934253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02375599,0.010769649,0.0021997443,0.22165519,0.0015404435,0.0000905882,0.0013108118,0.00010609291,0.7385715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5239965,0.0069179498,0.004050438,0.036444593,0.00036363487,0.00007102955,0.00051253993,0.000087053704,0.42755637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971685,0.00028987788,0.000058008485,0.00026726892,0.001316809,0.0008995199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840504,0.00036236778,0.00009211878,0.0000818852,0.000706782,0.0003518842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018148082,0.00028380082,0.00019092164,0.0009619138,0.015726876,0.007982797,0.0012172955,0.0034912392,0.012407916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038609232,0.00031705323,0.00030957843,0.001502091,0.010374191,0.0022419046,0.001348562,0.0025405746,0.0009788456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002171719,0.000010032827,0.0025712347,0.000113418544,0.000009587837,0.00034107777,0.010970422,0.00014016317,0.00047457032,0.75892246,0.2113437,0.015081664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008096428,0.0000048576226,0.005340953,0.00013776816,0.000008844174,0.000044139553,0.006541302,0.00009384746,0.00020312174,0.021888249,0.9657015,0.000027321068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9843054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99480045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09620176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09620176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1226948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6979959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408302358","doi":"10.1002/iir.1559","title":"Insolvency practitioners: Appointment, duties, powers and liability, By Hugh SimsKC, Simon PassfieldKC, StefanRamel, HollyDoyle, JamesHannant, RachelLai, et al. (2nd Ed.), Elgar: Cheltenham. 2024. pp. 408. £165. ISBN: 978‐1‐03531‐189‐7","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Liability; Law and economics; Law; Management; Political science; Economic history; Economics","score_opus":0.01961311691244946,"score_gpt":0.36118878283707323,"score_spread":0.3415756659246238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408302358","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012593623,0.97876394,0.00020462551,0.012746193,0.0028116617,0.000011652424,0.00013920154,0.000021007836,0.0051757763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033731952,0.9456983,0.00043388858,0.005491628,0.005201167,0.000051918818,0.00041285384,0.00004319061,0.03929378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986052,0.00037186698,0.00016014955,0.00017839311,0.0005583684,0.00012611973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974247,0.0013825957,0.00044873083,0.00006739354,0.0004763736,0.00020021114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024772815,0.002260044,0.001234541,0.005088344,0.0011360472,0.004522733,0.0016407203,0.0038600601,0.04001835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006876616,0.0013519723,0.00071985496,0.0064888196,0.00246554,0.0061137145,0.002612302,0.0038583092,0.019883733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028531107,0.000019277573,0.00021923213,0.00079779513,0.00000963812,0.00004072373,0.00022788119,0.00010305625,0.000051441242,0.002884552,0.8723946,0.12322326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012726492,0.000021395566,0.0018899944,0.00401731,0.000011325807,0.00037887134,0.00038400912,0.000104462626,0.000040166957,0.0037008845,0.9894259,0.000013012696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026866894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04690308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04001835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038015964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040015588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13387471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408328726","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12350","title":"The common law tort of appropriation of personality in Ontario.using legal transplant to solve the problem of the image rights lacuna in UK law.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Appropriation; Law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030595546660662557,"score_gpt":0.2946379649575176,"score_spread":0.26404241829685504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408328726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21766594,0.0013072168,0.012990018,0.030300245,0.000484074,0.00034210333,0.00023496435,0.00012743918,0.736548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89441574,0.000398197,0.002774848,0.0050539398,0.000102415266,0.00009535261,0.000038637314,0.000030130166,0.09709074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99150074,0.0010480391,0.0004384851,0.0010667176,0.004061461,0.0018844763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935633,0.002607174,0.0007482922,0.0009794442,0.0015550852,0.0005465937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004833289,0.0003618085,0.0002977489,0.0010669073,0.0087457355,0.0060815183,0.0016415055,0.007914451,0.0042564683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013511516,0.000645413,0.00067613216,0.00094194536,0.019910412,0.0033905825,0.0055072443,0.00461006,0.00043089644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004026819,0.000026491514,0.004299987,0.000039335006,0.000013480195,0.0010389212,0.009668903,0.0006153896,0.00082838984,0.9644283,0.009875527,0.009124998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014304923,0.00024183466,0.025036639,0.00062780885,0.00022729945,0.0017249116,0.013379521,0.010323993,0.004252339,0.23232602,0.7113142,0.00040241846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7857118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8476466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21428818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039947428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032532044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4311003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408566539","doi":"10.63188/gpa2023_002","title":"Disbursing Charity: What is the Duty of Foundations to the Canadian Nonprofit Sector?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Grant Professionals Association","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Nonprofit sector; Business; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06136183962177603,"score_gpt":0.36979394320184206,"score_spread":0.308432103580066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408566539","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015761143,0.045388047,0.00046500514,0.8939773,0.0027458654,0.000045185723,0.00028782294,0.000044167882,0.041285533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.636967,0.13521636,0.0021788287,0.19678181,0.0018946923,0.00007459777,0.0005236547,0.00011806858,0.02624504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985598,0.0016517161,0.00030063352,0.00085291016,0.0069595776,0.0046371636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93095815,0.0054477053,0.0022081633,0.00077818765,0.039972145,0.02063561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011948819,0.0006139266,0.00089016656,0.0035524752,0.031324085,0.02036922,0.0035041096,0.006674139,0.007709821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04501905,0.00060397154,0.00079263846,0.0056236563,0.018172404,0.009445226,0.004635248,0.009954837,0.0009961758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013251299,0.00013700538,0.021341726,0.0016563389,0.00012338853,0.00068940286,0.02867203,0.00039997505,0.00046694154,0.13600135,0.5895761,0.22080323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006550021,0.00006317334,0.053750496,0.007039146,0.00018876359,0.0006523561,0.10410958,0.0008720204,0.0004488564,0.030858904,0.8015143,0.00043683802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98989785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19549458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19549458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42550623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93311226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408806831","doi":"10.63485/ab4w7-k0621","title":"OA as an unprecedented public good","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.08426702099443674,"score_gpt":0.40642558340145074,"score_spread":0.322158562407014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408806831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010265541,0.008958684,0.0068048895,0.17276122,0.0013921303,0.00002532552,0.0001649302,0.00016773705,0.7994596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80770683,0.0073713795,0.0028247603,0.031975985,0.004200137,0.000099536635,0.00013416926,0.00020892218,0.14547825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955611,0.0014301358,0.00013336923,0.00065432757,0.0014211375,0.0007998336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960996,0.0017548127,0.0002932589,0.00078303274,0.0005211392,0.00054812117],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003579743,0.0002549087,0.0003780691,0.0012609217,0.0051645306,0.016985103,0.000746073,0.008255161,0.018333405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008824462,0.00029387645,0.00049337046,0.0010587329,0.016531192,0.02353364,0.0073170825,0.008395811,0.0024926208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029610849,0.000003591849,0.000024837755,0.000005733068,0.0000010136185,0.000010272803,0.0002317675,0.00003600016,0.000025241698,0.9898127,0.008356527,0.0014894789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055824544,0.0000055230707,0.00013070379,0.000048519083,0.0000031560576,0.000035479177,0.00044224405,0.00016583236,0.00010747976,0.8407728,0.15827337,0.000009359887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00637335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006470815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006092342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035959408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06133133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409058475","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v14n1p70","title":"The Creation of an English Criminal Code: 6 Acts Second Act - Property &amp; Finance Crimes Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Code (set theory); Criminal code; Business; Criminology; Law; Law and economics; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10925139996268438,"score_gpt":0.4668097431176286,"score_spread":0.35755834315494417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409058475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013184718,0.007107364,0.0038908517,0.14735515,0.014726932,0.0010039165,0.013789479,0.0006172464,0.79832435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045907643,0.0018717116,0.0066316877,0.0573613,0.0017416779,0.0010704476,0.005835128,0.00028505796,0.87929535],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874072,0.0011826458,0.0010988341,0.0006873063,0.0077945795,0.0018293705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97930866,0.003645658,0.0014024635,0.0009471424,0.012371771,0.002324314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006275228,0.00092337985,0.00095464673,0.002360516,0.0054871687,0.0064417482,0.0017117538,0.011186767,0.024682807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021585086,0.0010045193,0.0009837126,0.001570668,0.0021551668,0.0032516443,0.0033691383,0.009071915,0.023498569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058185542,0.00008761039,0.0011048834,0.00009990709,0.0000080489135,0.00027608706,0.0007355121,0.00007192429,0.00054610526,0.10651478,0.8777709,0.012726084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039970535,0.00004170982,0.009550174,0.0002722183,0.000013942316,0.00016381513,0.00043849988,0.00018732091,0.0004514083,0.003116078,0.98566145,0.00006337525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1477398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19524916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1477398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006539343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038277782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2937597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410157873","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1719","title":"Risks, Benefits, Opportunities, and Electronic Formalities in the Law of Wills","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07881980587268692,"score_gpt":0.3379319718446832,"score_spread":0.25911216597199627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410157873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32179826,0.007954558,0.028062861,0.0759712,0.00043867825,0.00015435489,0.00007572357,0.00009179285,0.5654526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977066,0.0010124312,0.0019372702,0.0016226808,0.00022607668,0.000063442356,0.000011631388,0.000022368746,0.018038016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97591406,0.010181288,0.0009963643,0.0014048087,0.008557184,0.0029463626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96719867,0.020749202,0.0035572476,0.003838233,0.0034130285,0.0012436319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01380571,0.00041536608,0.00035703258,0.0019207287,0.008972568,0.020171706,0.0019169305,0.0070097805,0.005250145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03318843,0.0007847373,0.00055384135,0.0020747394,0.06312469,0.013140142,0.013528222,0.006444636,0.0005095952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013564346,0.000009101071,0.0009447287,0.00001803754,0.0000034657246,0.00012729934,0.004872445,0.00033683184,0.00008129571,0.98868924,0.0005714428,0.004332547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003216495,0.00009107125,0.0043869936,0.0006632494,0.000038968763,0.0004983499,0.016289584,0.0016271468,0.0006056604,0.87532866,0.10034115,0.00009695566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030417467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0274903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030417467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126214605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011400167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09157556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410362060","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2025-0066","title":"Did Aristotle have a Doctrine of Existential Import?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.050380294477572286,"score_gpt":0.41143757792315333,"score_spread":0.361057283445581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410362060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10807803,0.0045424607,0.0749227,0.11899745,0.001167822,0.00005760541,0.00015548583,0.00019000772,0.6918884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97994345,0.0006655237,0.0047695357,0.004260357,0.00046246377,0.00002790293,0.000036684076,0.00005293601,0.009781031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997088,0.0009349883,0.00015442196,0.0005004584,0.000988426,0.00033372326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949812,0.0024219234,0.00036371002,0.000936059,0.001012984,0.00028425796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005904821,0.0002775082,0.0007121633,0.0013700482,0.003664128,0.004982787,0.0012798803,0.004288491,0.0042661377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007908014,0.00036406732,0.0006918315,0.00079891266,0.0343862,0.01200709,0.0039872434,0.006545495,0.0006848909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047456415,0.0000046381583,0.00008553963,0.0000072447874,0.000001849828,0.000029366418,0.00064343994,0.00004115046,0.000031682735,0.9976926,0.00053013273,0.00092768087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007928168,0.0000046936575,0.00013141466,0.000025710353,0.0000027450726,0.000044245717,0.00029469994,0.00020969706,0.00008599666,0.99077517,0.008412384,0.0000051289935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00307808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023489448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005904821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005081153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021903599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036866486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410943982","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttaf033","title":"Settlors in Canadian Trusts: some thoughts on the role","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.011468802186861552,"score_gpt":0.2979660934287192,"score_spread":0.2864972912418577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410943982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16004257,0.02163443,0.004247399,0.44769013,0.0024817518,0.00016950413,0.00041739392,0.00007920612,0.36323765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402392,0.007823204,0.0013958596,0.017378999,0.00024985604,0.00004392152,0.000080373604,0.00005223884,0.032736387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98604685,0.0027600443,0.0002847151,0.00086199003,0.0038500666,0.0061963364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98045796,0.0033481934,0.0010949199,0.00042260415,0.009239008,0.0054372926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009523925,0.00048747894,0.00057789125,0.0035867745,0.039374344,0.015917778,0.003600074,0.0061079366,0.009314209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018339198,0.0006081904,0.0008277947,0.006137214,0.028321894,0.0074806586,0.005345479,0.0076450994,0.00046551364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038175443,0.000033573284,0.010688088,0.00015265183,0.000017821441,0.0011643099,0.10645054,0.00031565604,0.00022102843,0.8016817,0.06364933,0.015587157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003547594,0.000036444904,0.026028346,0.0012591372,0.000058640337,0.0005432168,0.33399013,0.0009344263,0.00037226983,0.037802532,0.5986649,0.00027451472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99482524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2672062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2672062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2034027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84993696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410972143","doi":"10.31124/advance.173917491.11218139/v2","title":"Hidden ownership, asymmetrical information, and multidecadal contractual obligations at Saskatchewan’s first public-private partnership long-term care home","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Term (time); Business; Private information retrieval; Finance; Computer security","score_opus":0.03499618664248422,"score_gpt":0.3142954325499163,"score_spread":0.2792992459074321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410972143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53501105,0.17851783,0.009711006,0.07857019,0.00056997885,0.0008257098,0.009115753,0.000051545892,0.18762697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555168,0.032029323,0.004549197,0.0033797415,0.00003611449,0.00024195663,0.00093293807,0.00001059271,0.00330336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98352975,0.0074570556,0.0017448199,0.001062144,0.004304125,0.0019020643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93059254,0.047738317,0.0068385536,0.0024114754,0.010771418,0.0016476922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019971171,0.00020864682,0.00048478323,0.0056540775,0.0058451123,0.0073912744,0.0016990361,0.0012586238,0.0034525848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055216946,0.0003161426,0.00063623034,0.013534142,0.0064136013,0.004578339,0.003996283,0.0013455721,0.00012001763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002364406,0.00007879163,0.12774454,0.016448796,0.0005638085,0.0038383019,0.10281395,0.0016566687,0.0005867659,0.41653615,0.027770037,0.30172575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010382482,0.00009675886,0.2068095,0.07968391,0.001040109,0.0013376492,0.23497896,0.0016281402,0.001436863,0.083729,0.388863,0.00029225054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8868219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9551115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113178074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07584727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1666894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.550313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411089038","doi":"10.29173/wclawr117","title":"Wrongfully Convicted Women","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.017042004162968805,"score_gpt":0.3436933482779303,"score_spread":0.3266513441149615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411089038","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065958105,0.79461014,0.0009857919,0.028894199,0.0016164356,0.00014993141,0.000662543,0.000028657185,0.10709418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31511715,0.6401122,0.0004820702,0.017262742,0.00068258366,0.00018338408,0.00045717636,0.000016092406,0.025686614],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739254,0.0011283003,0.0002426625,0.00020996884,0.0005466687,0.00047981058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732363,0.001261865,0.0007031211,0.00011110657,0.00042516668,0.00017508146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002658914,0.00020084747,0.0005003077,0.0010407091,0.0015381075,0.0012401857,0.0006625534,0.0010212731,0.0075323367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070954673,0.00022372503,0.00050771737,0.0012634346,0.0015985568,0.0010706084,0.0019906927,0.0009897929,0.0011313657],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010886562,0.00009928202,0.028269194,0.014429767,0.00015609471,0.0044577303,0.024517711,0.00014302011,0.0005245677,0.07490053,0.08798652,0.76440674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022002961,0.00017794267,0.036138874,0.029461095,0.00015173084,0.006972201,0.035287555,0.000033071366,0.0004949569,0.009368888,0.88185865,0.000033046046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01098215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018153396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01098215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013397614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004442644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025198162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656062","doi":"10.51847/dktkwbwpkk","title":"10.51847/DkTKwBwpkk","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Liability; Damages; Law; Legal liability; Business; Strict liability; Breach of contract; Political science","score_opus":0.012294896984611047,"score_gpt":0.24415633813601803,"score_spread":0.23186144115140697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010044103,0.00024547733,0.0009842035,0.0006294423,0.00039027756,0.00007721121,0.0015708461,0.0008742329,0.9942238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002557854,0.0002105354,0.0006374809,0.00023032268,0.000032257285,0.000036066274,0.0009519472,0.0002753982,0.9950682],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996865,0.000029239558,0.000029372088,0.000091925795,0.00009974274,0.000063354164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932766,0.00013665872,0.000038235445,0.00011557453,0.00019256976,0.00018936885],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005638833,0.0010737659,0.000621397,0.0015768087,0.001126023,0.0033497405,0.0009599952,0.0024349482,0.9682022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011942203,0.00044314956,0.00043288045,0.0016800482,0.0007819039,0.0030536402,0.0025769311,0.0014759705,0.97674245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022620136,0.00025075054,0.001116597,0.0004968423,0.000016982147,0.00030494624,0.00018303902,0.00027717426,0.0042766994,0.012245867,0.4337292,0.5468757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023619166,0.000023286471,0.0009550495,0.00012641857,0.0000073220976,0.00022207217,0.00012665217,0.0001702498,0.0005083733,0.0014439237,0.9963806,0.000012315882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030094706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024605026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031797826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009201316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000706477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045355737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412270603","doi":"","title":"Taxation of Trusts in Denmark (Outline)","year":2016,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.06644892700253126,"score_gpt":0.3192923175441565,"score_spread":0.25284339054162525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412270603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14592418,0.05592961,0.041282397,0.01648874,0.0019940077,0.00045151342,0.003791531,0.00022448777,0.73391354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8310942,0.020422984,0.011484213,0.0007541284,0.00029276335,0.00015818285,0.0007196166,0.000047495916,0.13502638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986009,0.0003619936,0.00013437743,0.00023551115,0.0002909659,0.00037624134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947613,0.0001442524,0.00006562505,0.00009225226,0.00013627877,0.00008541115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012824605,0.0003995287,0.0006494122,0.0010444431,0.0015204758,0.0062750974,0.0009161827,0.0022881886,0.008422578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022845545,0.00071677763,0.0010001836,0.0014144037,0.0016352417,0.0037965328,0.0020015456,0.0015836654,0.0011626679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042795447,0.000029784549,0.0005710766,0.00016168834,0.00001655251,0.00006957246,0.00014495211,0.0042019137,0.0001080519,0.9745753,0.0073859165,0.012692395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008389112,0.000062312276,0.008660007,0.0005991116,0.00007595407,0.00046961705,0.0006020039,0.007575875,0.00065423665,0.70481783,0.27632502,0.00007420287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03577617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023108885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03577617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007834666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049253777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07113588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412759980","doi":"10.31338/2544-3135.si.2025-106.7","title":"Articulating Contractual Good Faith: The Evolving Civil and Common Law Dimension","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Iuridica","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dimension (graph theory); Law; Faith; Good faith; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology; Commercial law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013861835738713895,"score_gpt":0.3093294926276907,"score_spread":0.2954676568889768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412759980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0805718,0.029275645,0.30558404,0.15990327,0.0011798709,0.00020366207,0.00010164262,0.0001484557,0.42303166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525553,0.0057519064,0.028080795,0.005693646,0.00065139047,0.00012942437,0.000042420772,0.000092551454,0.007002563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725719,0.014623847,0.0011520956,0.0022883988,0.007296525,0.0020672225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635247,0.024412453,0.002353943,0.0037823853,0.0036965853,0.0022299183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038176663,0.0006058228,0.0011656987,0.004143724,0.0074519343,0.026238235,0.00434002,0.010234937,0.0037188702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03736042,0.00083975156,0.0008216669,0.0031109774,0.12890963,0.028383642,0.015565158,0.01498209,0.0005052971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015400684,0.0000053356725,0.00006663643,0.000014080555,0.0000015938971,0.000024291227,0.003125739,0.00013218774,0.00002619396,0.9943821,0.00019306566,0.0020273186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003687117,0.00000939806,0.00017215242,0.00019034448,0.0000028205475,0.00005143123,0.003450818,0.0008005736,0.000065162836,0.97260296,0.022635177,0.000015471733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012331993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0088683115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038176663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01674829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018158432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20189995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412853825","doi":"10.1002/iir.70009","title":"A comparative study on the compensation of bankruptcy trustees in insolvent estates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Business; Compensation (psychology); Accounting; Financial system; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.1047342925634219,"score_gpt":0.45149467376249275,"score_spread":0.3467603811990708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412853825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99608386,0.00028499204,0.000055322675,0.00014110687,0.000007681925,0.000023218672,0.000083626575,7.1824275e-7,0.0033193955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99842155,0.00020817145,0.000049402253,0.00003595506,0.0000063050497,0.000012183032,0.0000739423,0.000001242547,0.0011912645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952864,0.0020572788,0.00039307575,0.00037130457,0.00088687823,0.0010051163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97868216,0.007975789,0.006818756,0.00045316375,0.0034125934,0.0026575772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004699536,0.00013170937,0.0004163105,0.0041046357,0.0014638675,0.0022375602,0.00072818226,0.00072237605,0.007470494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020179313,0.00021289871,0.0002731601,0.0042669903,0.0012099884,0.0018425084,0.0014335826,0.000763551,0.00039395547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063544663,0.00086164795,0.78710896,0.0005230448,0.000118680444,0.004033375,0.1580471,0.0003824818,0.0008472452,0.009701901,0.002940616,0.03479942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028445316,0.00056579686,0.75755584,0.00026912,0.00006439527,0.0009580215,0.2257022,0.00033211685,0.00037088487,0.0001942291,0.013927027,0.000031859523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032865513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06616366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032865513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006005975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028711325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06534845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413089984","doi":"10.1017/9781009636124.011","title":"On Making Appointments Fair","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.0322842402686457,"score_gpt":0.26385666982519607,"score_spread":0.23157242955655036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413089984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023644737,0.0010895905,0.0046394807,0.01577959,0.00078134565,0.000036549092,0.000041053252,0.000039583716,0.9752284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2261819,0.0012550657,0.0031077322,0.009759172,0.00066730066,0.0001659249,0.000062160274,0.00013430025,0.75866634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532145,0.0015665509,0.0000981512,0.0005233535,0.0012375336,0.00125296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978521,0.0011599209,0.00008911531,0.00035024356,0.00030745615,0.00024122663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062007695,0.000499985,0.00079894654,0.0011947311,0.007264876,0.0074756327,0.0017721353,0.006349831,0.07828384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013983955,0.00046012562,0.00058744865,0.0011657387,0.00936009,0.008437266,0.0041505243,0.007821819,0.009483478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007887113,0.000014169535,0.000037876343,0.000008561045,0.0000017169035,0.000020335981,0.00046542447,0.00008384158,0.00002348156,0.9505981,0.037941653,0.010797038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012279229,0.000008055872,0.0002318041,0.000085413594,0.000004620926,0.00002457939,0.0008870684,0.00030579357,0.00006243529,0.81099755,0.18737128,0.0000092384635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014555537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030928997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07828384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004710335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005164729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26188558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413097262","doi":"10.1002/iir.70002","title":"The return of crown preference: Perspectives from India and the <scp>United Kingdom</scp>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Preference; Crown (dentistry); Legislature; Kingdom; Position (finance); Supreme court; Limiting; Insolvency; Parliament; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance; Politics; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.05058705502240219,"score_gpt":0.36108201978325816,"score_spread":0.310494964760856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413097262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14243218,0.17738698,0.0010213213,0.20160313,0.0017331683,0.000023048107,0.00012001945,0.000019505962,0.47566074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94610554,0.0297972,0.00019652372,0.016470052,0.00044822594,0.000009942288,0.000021486241,0.000011214078,0.0069398303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952291,0.0021603557,0.00017042061,0.00035629421,0.00077359,0.0013103484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246114,0.005385576,0.0006051387,0.00020866326,0.000872968,0.00046650716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053533185,0.00021566937,0.00038673493,0.002357614,0.00746514,0.012239459,0.0009997488,0.0041472064,0.0029251308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055276235,0.00021573376,0.00034567146,0.0040791994,0.017468598,0.0033257136,0.0042095734,0.005552102,0.00026661408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029557059,0.000015969552,0.0014099877,0.0003075769,0.000013479631,0.0009916004,0.028754558,0.00022420741,0.00014294339,0.94047976,0.013853229,0.0137772085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015288126,0.000080030746,0.017323824,0.0022598458,0.000053085187,0.0009681324,0.0940182,0.0003211752,0.00053512945,0.088355936,0.79597807,0.00009129431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12917253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18016116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12917253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016651386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0117525505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25684136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142638","doi":"10.1093/9780198961208.003.0006","title":"The Underlying Conceptions of Fiduciary Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.08038781224331408,"score_gpt":0.36637237615113316,"score_spread":0.28598456390781907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013355549,0.007008257,0.03402211,0.016655914,0.0002463489,0.00004620392,0.000055356315,0.000042703166,0.9285677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9078033,0.004927222,0.015796052,0.004666312,0.0004773332,0.00021639165,0.00008208579,0.00007389691,0.065957345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994007,0.002870835,0.0001643639,0.00055194146,0.0018652752,0.0005406391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954405,0.0030819573,0.0002692517,0.00045951456,0.00054063916,0.00020814415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006667374,0.0004047376,0.00039999993,0.0027242273,0.005170654,0.011704097,0.0021009922,0.004333331,0.0037317274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007133475,0.00041075595,0.00039592924,0.0020309833,0.061640996,0.007864821,0.0035440777,0.006926813,0.00066107215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7925292e-7,8.666522e-7,0.000008237707,0.0000013311327,1.0250252e-7,0.0000033881106,0.00030706596,0.000020002964,0.000002474647,0.99910176,0.00022931075,0.0003253455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021288868,0.0000030368853,0.00010704991,0.00008138159,0.0000013364786,0.000027440748,0.00068238133,0.0003907397,0.000043958302,0.9611006,0.037555467,0.0000043913233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017900413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013590016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017900413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015256693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071421396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1106956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243876","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.035","title":"Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: “Some Basis in Fact” and the Certification of Common Issues","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Certification; Law; Proposition; Basis (linear algebra); Jurisprudence; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Test (biology); Common law; Legislation; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0829923196441618,"score_gpt":0.3618721441761079,"score_spread":0.2788798245319461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243876","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0514172,0.073588714,0.07738342,0.4943789,0.0058895624,0.00043519173,0.00016455942,0.00010713652,0.2966353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8416464,0.0220438,0.026947275,0.07877904,0.0019895744,0.00013690312,0.0000884095,0.00007798548,0.02829063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97275555,0.010306711,0.0011871427,0.0022658692,0.011148857,0.0023359268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9440322,0.036847975,0.0036744433,0.0023466006,0.011800732,0.0012979617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021880828,0.00037624457,0.00063795777,0.0054124314,0.0067009046,0.0145932445,0.0022038396,0.010328474,0.0039324006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04014426,0.00061201426,0.0011773289,0.0021064407,0.039507553,0.014255355,0.0037124853,0.0141594345,0.00061632274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010089639,0.000015381942,0.00064580917,0.0001235992,0.000011065934,0.00022446952,0.0020571253,0.00018341595,0.00017583312,0.9728143,0.009382518,0.014356265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024435789,0.00008604721,0.004930533,0.002584344,0.00007301701,0.00056810386,0.0073268823,0.001443523,0.0019589288,0.62824607,0.35261732,0.00014079874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080067776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12099097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91993225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018466076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0338496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15920347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243903","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.003","title":"Fair Compensation or Unjustified Temptation to Compromise?: An Empirical Review of Requests for Honorarium Awards in Canadian Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Compromise; Compensation (psychology); Payment; Temptation; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law; Action (physics); Empirical research; Conflict of interest; Political science; Public relations; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21982134167779294,"score_gpt":0.46766112993700404,"score_spread":0.2478397882592111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5824306,0.28211525,0.00179218,0.022729073,0.0005298803,0.0009339288,0.0041028825,0.000030013938,0.10533628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94382757,0.05105774,0.000878155,0.0017022999,0.0000789806,0.00011688171,0.00040439743,0.000021690046,0.0019122734],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9510277,0.007890746,0.004022007,0.0023111668,0.03226569,0.0024827474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6571669,0.19186792,0.052570865,0.004324429,0.090150185,0.0039196447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04523768,0.00034039284,0.00090632954,0.017478421,0.0073882565,0.008953884,0.003161651,0.0016853365,0.004835549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19885486,0.0005388126,0.00071572815,0.031709567,0.008814711,0.0030352713,0.002089112,0.0022571008,0.00024910353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004792317,0.00028261452,0.42362866,0.019885192,0.0008210089,0.0011589455,0.10982839,0.000895137,0.00053386454,0.06466642,0.038929533,0.33889094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049429505,0.00010546408,0.73249656,0.018269118,0.0011064687,0.00036849783,0.07675917,0.000753994,0.0006865959,0.0021051452,0.16708349,0.00021607534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9409803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97818327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098841935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098841935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18317029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71715176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243930","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.101","title":"Unchartered Grounds: Covid-19 and Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Damages; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Government (linguistics); Law; Certification; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.17310998654147897,"score_gpt":0.40800666870288205,"score_spread":0.23489668216140308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1826707,0.003117571,0.0073691383,0.04551476,0.00051630614,0.0001732224,0.00030886166,0.00010158205,0.7602278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96205515,0.00077847386,0.0007010967,0.0046664043,0.00008407068,0.000019448902,0.00006206804,0.00003350006,0.03159985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98639524,0.0013535249,0.0003075046,0.0013004128,0.0053456523,0.005297705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803782,0.006141743,0.0025286693,0.0010962319,0.0067327595,0.0031223113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067988937,0.00030584278,0.00035095296,0.0025887424,0.024098115,0.013696105,0.0022645732,0.0067761093,0.014712589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023240348,0.00045147698,0.00051095075,0.0025239703,0.025075482,0.0033238495,0.004774812,0.010550907,0.0006483918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003353568,0.00006237823,0.021928001,0.00006498583,0.000015569325,0.00095011736,0.015463799,0.0004812961,0.0002393157,0.90479034,0.022300595,0.033670016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048476297,0.00012674466,0.0992356,0.0012834324,0.00013537306,0.0008714959,0.052508034,0.002498825,0.002457661,0.16739401,0.6730943,0.0003460712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91166943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.953646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08833057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073881455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09651278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53604996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244033","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i1.053","title":"The Short End of the Stick: Bolstering Legal Protections for Short Sellers in Ontario’s Secondary Market","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Issuer; Redress; Secondary market; Business; Position (finance); Enforcement; Statute; Investment banking; Security market; Law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.059395177767649965,"score_gpt":0.32493786469464064,"score_spread":0.2655426869269907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082847156,0.15463293,0.007245667,0.21770705,0.003144058,0.0005167059,0.0010291337,0.00011566038,0.53276163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7477573,0.08017084,0.0064512542,0.02808215,0.0012299584,0.00014772448,0.00043616103,0.00004043422,0.1356842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943317,0.0007755809,0.0003040763,0.00032404548,0.0033991334,0.00086539215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851614,0.0039807265,0.0016350196,0.0005489223,0.007663694,0.0010102945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006402077,0.00021308413,0.00031656967,0.002159515,0.0044871196,0.0039170035,0.0016825492,0.002728646,0.003483729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011613334,0.00024397657,0.00040828125,0.0020723774,0.00535937,0.0015217548,0.0011924442,0.0018566392,0.00032119668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095703166,0.000057568937,0.009231621,0.0022203864,0.000051797542,0.0010123701,0.010901196,0.0010602224,0.0014814573,0.6181526,0.18167056,0.1740645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025294876,0.000046121157,0.015058964,0.0016389494,0.00005994562,0.00011501938,0.0015250901,0.00039454427,0.0005946519,0.01211547,0.96839327,0.000032657485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9134355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9585729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08656448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053394847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13869253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38740855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244059","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.187","title":"Determining a Fair Price for Carriage?: Applying a “Fee-Driven” Factor and Reverse Auctions to Adjudicating Carriage Motions in Ontario","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Adjudication; Discretion; Common value auction; Commission; Test (biology); Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Carriage; Reverse auction; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Business; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10897969187089407,"score_gpt":0.3628210406555465,"score_spread":0.2538413487846524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70559156,0.0010211287,0.019866688,0.015964225,0.00017822534,0.00095535145,0.0004144731,0.000072640876,0.25593567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787603,0.00037921307,0.004247546,0.0005965996,0.00004049189,0.000057030713,0.00006402694,0.000011790679,0.01584303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98804605,0.0022367253,0.00075059576,0.0011931362,0.004532523,0.003240866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825943,0.008837572,0.0016031738,0.0009416316,0.004990156,0.0010331587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010096037,0.0003386514,0.0004899685,0.0014637009,0.010797088,0.008818579,0.0026069493,0.0036096897,0.0052160886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0319066,0.00079602795,0.000627907,0.002194641,0.0068405117,0.0028643326,0.003243553,0.0028598881,0.0003133702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008246933,0.00034696338,0.1353264,0.0005563575,0.000231629,0.006195918,0.033059128,0.020064957,0.0048908666,0.6842542,0.02900724,0.08524157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008217856,0.0008198279,0.27386785,0.00091222173,0.0009650513,0.0018730108,0.07357082,0.10018216,0.012400347,0.16756754,0.3658916,0.0011278397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9542634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0936597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0936597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10403329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67955184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244088","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.005","title":"The Collective Class Action: An Expansion of the Class Action Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Collective action; Class (philosophy); Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Indigenous; Political science; Corporate governance; Constructive; Discretion; Diversity (politics); Action (physics); Public relations; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.07336874934503602,"score_gpt":0.37243002289313965,"score_spread":0.29906127354810363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006599933,0.035085417,0.094726555,0.10157931,0.0019457014,0.00047818164,0.0001669982,0.00010450649,0.75931346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81373733,0.018021932,0.07861007,0.016541805,0.0021094119,0.00089424103,0.00011981519,0.000109896064,0.06985556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702248,0.014437801,0.00089162524,0.0021750352,0.009101626,0.0031691105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788054,0.011647991,0.0010121624,0.0013716687,0.0059315423,0.001231276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037995238,0.0007437018,0.0009961098,0.0073109893,0.009712145,0.012000485,0.004152318,0.0071026636,0.0062094554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01744135,0.0005819072,0.0010693326,0.0034641002,0.05190829,0.005918157,0.0050076703,0.007829642,0.00060408405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017199336,0.0000037349466,0.00007312947,0.00004282389,0.0000019418328,0.000025012183,0.0006491919,0.00023424739,0.00001692751,0.9921934,0.0023233695,0.0044345492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025215651,0.000024568799,0.0012327835,0.0010021083,0.000023629162,0.00006732991,0.0011910191,0.0019557176,0.00012488577,0.621165,0.3731442,0.000043552707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4377464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45774534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4377464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052935846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07734485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87039685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244119","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.051","title":"An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-Term Care Facilities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Long-term care; Government (linguistics); Plaintiff; Legislature; Pandemic; Political science; Duty of care; Causation; Public administration; Business; Public relations; Economic growth; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Nursing; Economics","score_opus":0.2214919206352509,"score_gpt":0.42846463517584543,"score_spread":0.20697271454059454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20036753,0.24472018,0.002820886,0.105744645,0.0021861957,0.00050403195,0.0040213973,0.0001229962,0.43951204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69698626,0.21265565,0.0022234968,0.010993915,0.0011755177,0.0002407949,0.0015391962,0.0000885113,0.07409669],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752957,0.0002823336,0.000110658264,0.00011179558,0.0009260003,0.0010396675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631846,0.0008176937,0.0007019885,0.00010405093,0.0010829263,0.00097495446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001558907,0.00037268974,0.00027183045,0.0035082744,0.009829275,0.005223735,0.0015868971,0.0020806678,0.007249718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00264821,0.00045371457,0.0005514816,0.0068865945,0.005834947,0.0022724723,0.0030146025,0.0018353008,0.0003163024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001538014,0.00014661437,0.08442352,0.0058548404,0.000105233856,0.0042983326,0.18526524,0.0017282522,0.0021315701,0.2110932,0.21578725,0.28901216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057581783,0.000031777898,0.08093849,0.0015996359,0.000019154411,0.00026332986,0.02637809,0.00013565455,0.0001192695,0.0015212119,0.8889347,0.000052918556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98131853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99262637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14911674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14911674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14068162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98690397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465233","doi":"10.29173/mlj1368","title":"Preface","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.021361202753407717,"score_gpt":0.32803747523212057,"score_spread":0.3066762724787129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017572615,0.017971326,0.0010059952,0.06804252,0.19601613,0.0003006521,0.004693301,0.00043391448,0.70977896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008501697,0.009935671,0.00068964006,0.012299617,0.037871134,0.00013448093,0.0028291384,0.00030186266,0.92743677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912626,0.0000979222,0.00003915097,0.000102241975,0.00052167306,0.000112741734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934323,0.00071825925,0.00022715655,0.0004083066,0.004281601,0.0009324482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012055587,0.000805256,0.00062030734,0.004722254,0.007125658,0.0063926717,0.0013321692,0.0015447887,0.18463108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00573911,0.0004592943,0.0003446108,0.0044532665,0.0014149541,0.0017846122,0.0017502934,0.0033469384,0.08129839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001264094,0.000011593166,0.00017726433,0.00005557581,0.000001232172,0.00004347854,0.0002259979,0.000025638376,0.00008961243,0.006999063,0.9812593,0.011098687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014833012,0.000003770878,0.00054882077,0.000097001765,9.5039877e-7,0.000028358263,0.00020511005,0.000016552338,0.00002951505,0.00068288523,0.99838245,0.0000032907626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08951911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16493808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18463108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007010534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010149177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465260","doi":"10.29173/mlj1379","title":"Preface and Issue Overview","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.031145639095207532,"score_gpt":0.3455390475111375,"score_spread":0.31439340841593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465260","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014725825,0.03209351,0.002307426,0.11078248,0.4340918,0.00087239314,0.007045481,0.0010309496,0.41030344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057846,0.02314216,0.0016643989,0.0267862,0.09172293,0.0005373542,0.006142258,0.0008980279,0.84332204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985066,0.00013312003,0.000113743015,0.00018614002,0.00088036276,0.00017993574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98732066,0.00093238254,0.0004652315,0.0005935767,0.009290603,0.0013975219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025005024,0.00092814205,0.0008173138,0.006703765,0.0049530054,0.007085229,0.0020129315,0.0024618125,0.1653529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012130736,0.0005788697,0.00047708603,0.0063790744,0.0011082782,0.0034443308,0.0026241352,0.004472126,0.09190083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000087002945,0.000012419126,0.0001144295,0.00012761017,0.0000012097141,0.000028313485,0.000079509125,0.000024691646,0.00008476288,0.0024252292,0.98094213,0.01615085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012351092,0.0000047405133,0.00034849189,0.00015188786,0.0000011679246,0.00001989525,0.00006128666,0.000011259775,0.000025040485,0.00041848485,0.99895334,0.0000031692032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040938057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07268004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1653529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00538691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01105632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55316055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803125","doi":"10.29173/mlj1475","title":"Property, Civil Forfeiture and the Charter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Scope (computer science); Civil law (Civil law); Civil procedure; Common law; Legislation; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Computer science","score_opus":0.014908231254335335,"score_gpt":0.2769943145947178,"score_spread":0.26208608334038247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12144643,0.01733982,0.020715693,0.12270805,0.0006604513,0.00019918877,0.00013217179,0.000085016145,0.71671325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456287,0.003961862,0.0059503247,0.008168567,0.00025981816,0.000107136584,0.00003329531,0.000019401103,0.03587082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947023,0.0022438178,0.00017873793,0.0005480758,0.0015004957,0.00082657277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888081,0.007436744,0.0013467731,0.0006654913,0.0012484733,0.0004944858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008416093,0.00025864184,0.0005068963,0.0021767903,0.0076550725,0.010175827,0.0013186968,0.0048766993,0.003170949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012309908,0.00031482102,0.00033743356,0.0023748938,0.06354234,0.0040296866,0.003577179,0.005052538,0.00030424815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029913672,0.000006360621,0.0005194357,0.000015023683,0.0000016937901,0.00009368541,0.0016039526,0.00014834364,0.000036048503,0.99305856,0.0010224857,0.0034914692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001882282,0.00006882699,0.0061035343,0.0004612685,0.00001875947,0.00032604206,0.0071735173,0.0011217496,0.0004955463,0.8377344,0.14641838,0.000059163285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20625636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24013475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7937436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016198562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034128882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4101116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413833900","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198979937.003.0017","title":"Entick v Carrington [1765] 95 ER 807, King’s Bench","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02765314973302715,"score_gpt":0.2502699038478347,"score_spread":0.22261675411480755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413833900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022905355,0.011083154,0.00043338534,0.021136116,0.0014104288,0.00006523685,0.00018703962,0.000031664455,0.9633626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059705943,0.004442988,0.0005061089,0.048548553,0.0006252831,0.00019004915,0.00011946205,0.000060283804,0.8858014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979406,0.00034122905,0.000096487296,0.00032514345,0.00082080753,0.00047563962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994198,0.00027382962,0.00005640364,0.000038219758,0.00015437034,0.00005737389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017611384,0.0008366343,0.00037049854,0.0016553347,0.006536892,0.006569177,0.001578222,0.012475674,0.030921135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005002802,0.0006419246,0.00034410818,0.0014258634,0.00592014,0.0044267112,0.002290269,0.0088272905,0.0072939377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016851605,0.0000093756635,0.00012983663,0.00007015211,0.0000029789505,0.00029620467,0.002233391,0.00005114452,0.000112452675,0.5008022,0.4869153,0.009360122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075817984,0.00000789791,0.00038750673,0.0002506761,0.000004744858,0.00010125187,0.00064125744,0.00002988818,0.00014384522,0.016189897,0.9822181,0.000017336795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22128965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3523375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22128965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014842319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008380121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44000316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413846728","doi":"10.61784/jtfe3058","title":"CODE VERSUS PRECEDENT: BLOCKCHAIN-DRIVEN GOVERNANCE AS A RESPONSE TO THE CRISIS OF TRUSTS IN MODERN CANADIAN FINANCE","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of trends in financial and economics.","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blockchain; Corporate governance; Code (set theory); Financial crisis; Business; Accounting; Law and economics; Political science; Computer security; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Programming language; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.01889666350156592,"score_gpt":0.2978890596091559,"score_spread":0.27899239610758997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413846728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.423648,0.0023314385,0.029864384,0.12987587,0.00038652626,0.00021516618,0.00038657858,0.00026296996,0.41302904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98292875,0.00037393,0.0018518046,0.0010707054,0.000014566826,0.000015917627,0.000036362286,0.000018208239,0.01368983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972275,0.00065347087,0.00004706042,0.00019714826,0.0010094149,0.0008654065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952597,0.0010547872,0.000358077,0.00044580325,0.0018703173,0.0010113313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035997732,0.00016212957,0.00015570121,0.0009961278,0.008737827,0.006406403,0.0011426999,0.0017419428,0.0040889066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01213316,0.00015466438,0.00018544737,0.0014885426,0.00910904,0.0024959228,0.0024225588,0.0018384036,0.0002758253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006286524,0.000031914933,0.006887721,0.000043902703,0.000010870486,0.0003916754,0.01347268,0.005469987,0.0007694712,0.9079104,0.0250956,0.039852865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010049707,0.000085328094,0.024081137,0.00036698932,0.00007212574,0.0002493015,0.03728603,0.02729733,0.0027214247,0.2651847,0.642385,0.00017017308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9536964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9691306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070774265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070774265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.121262334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51350564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414002350","doi":"10.1017/9781009288743.016","title":"Index","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.024962027218617282,"score_gpt":0.26156285488841435,"score_spread":0.23660082766979706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414002350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008382771,0.010009038,0.002896511,0.010139957,0.015712844,0.001254358,0.17229156,0.0035920704,0.7832654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026497652,0.010446567,0.0016087833,0.0018844295,0.0047444305,0.0006008019,0.0790741,0.0009884608,0.8980025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985561,0.00011073305,0.00020541078,0.00017017317,0.00084627775,0.000111295754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290985,0.00076281204,0.00043969075,0.0004872085,0.0047336533,0.00066671224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010183137,0.0011004463,0.0010302754,0.008652436,0.0013561228,0.005649208,0.0014045895,0.00087807,0.7273782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010583483,0.00044370204,0.0005848433,0.010148919,0.00036845964,0.0033040645,0.001629727,0.0012485589,0.63437855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017385455,0.000010569458,0.00008761674,0.0003737099,0.0000019424149,0.000015626802,0.000023125172,0.000056131536,0.00009029408,0.00129327,0.94930935,0.048720997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030790686,0.000009784112,0.00036661985,0.00020701622,0.0000021040862,0.000015217157,0.000026834214,0.0000143198795,0.000052135492,0.00063451857,0.99866414,0.000004266595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075881644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063484646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2726218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022436578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032292735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414071278","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10052","title":"The Subjects of Tort Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Delict; Doctrine; Private law; Subject (documents); Public law; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.016434396882441093,"score_gpt":0.3204014645644135,"score_spread":0.3039670676819724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414071278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021728251,0.010226003,0.039441116,0.044906557,0.00070244394,0.00018855622,0.0002031578,0.00008820293,0.8825158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89215946,0.008823802,0.012396179,0.008655124,0.002317317,0.0003455222,0.00021249054,0.00012409272,0.074965924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927563,0.0037553885,0.00026835263,0.00093870924,0.001662464,0.00061868934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376124,0.0035620735,0.00052087725,0.00082833524,0.00087344076,0.00045396882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073796236,0.00052992906,0.0006961271,0.0028120165,0.0065616746,0.0119126355,0.0013448418,0.00587546,0.011224365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072801122,0.00044719072,0.00061541406,0.002034393,0.060170244,0.009567945,0.00435819,0.006395613,0.00140365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.859745e-7,0.0000024545784,0.000039018578,0.0000046200566,5.6705943e-7,0.000007084692,0.00080402213,0.000018331675,0.00002070878,0.998111,0.000479481,0.00051195023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052871687,0.000007708736,0.0002061941,0.000115417904,0.0000031080742,0.000030527455,0.0012154864,0.00011959461,0.00005474276,0.9218381,0.07639926,0.0000045144734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008272494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051146294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119126355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00867157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007451969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062916934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414135228","doi":"10.1017/9781009335935.008","title":"Index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Sample (material); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02512086990694769,"score_gpt":0.27207632188809194,"score_spread":0.24695545198114424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414135228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007748606,0.008967978,0.0027986781,0.010003863,0.015197129,0.0011775987,0.1520145,0.003379514,0.8056858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024871104,0.009520204,0.001529384,0.001814323,0.0044475743,0.0005757192,0.071595,0.00095591473,0.90707475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985366,0.00011538792,0.00020531668,0.00016937665,0.0008609822,0.000112331654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99297523,0.00076042104,0.00041088884,0.000485642,0.004717913,0.0006498859],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010269299,0.0010877035,0.0010175771,0.008605299,0.0013988308,0.0057951673,0.0014126147,0.0009063239,0.73269564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010648672,0.0004334945,0.00056259,0.01012338,0.00038345478,0.0034828796,0.001669906,0.0012815808,0.63937795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015917627,0.000010029838,0.00007772706,0.0003505786,0.0000017132803,0.000015318172,0.00002354394,0.00005311607,0.00008361376,0.0013193799,0.9524038,0.045645203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028430443,0.000008532237,0.00032262926,0.0002005206,0.0000018478055,0.000014380908,0.000027455855,0.000014086223,0.00004824787,0.0006433697,0.99871206,0.0000039160973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074067856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063301246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26730436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023124404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032622386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414324984","doi":"10.36644/mlr.124.1.tort","title":"Tort Law in a World of Scarce Compensatory Resources","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Tort; Damages; Delict; Strict liability; Vicarious liability; Mass tort; Bankruptcy; Plaintiff; Tort reform","score_opus":0.02353660793893506,"score_gpt":0.34467459605543654,"score_spread":0.32113798811650146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414324984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102513246,0.010149986,0.04634462,0.09984144,0.00063674577,0.00005886603,0.00029975112,0.00016592837,0.73998946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592282,0.0026843783,0.004877812,0.0070960275,0.0013719508,0.00008771742,0.00008706759,0.000065217944,0.024501592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970536,0.0011567891,0.000104880055,0.0006545671,0.00073111715,0.00029908025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963439,0.0018946875,0.00046656805,0.00063298614,0.0003908764,0.000270996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042391713,0.00031187665,0.0005654829,0.0017217532,0.006275095,0.0114404075,0.0009920133,0.0050527966,0.006524953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066781836,0.00037093306,0.0004456135,0.001157981,0.02996957,0.017902786,0.004094738,0.0060450374,0.0010322001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032275436,0.0000034377279,0.00007626632,0.000005988664,0.0000017062107,0.00007217245,0.0004160917,0.0002154248,0.000056561676,0.9969797,0.0012351997,0.0009342985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074741906,0.000008079523,0.00029908697,0.00005495684,0.0000029002272,0.00010619467,0.00051107595,0.00063155446,0.00005150811,0.9668251,0.03149133,0.000010732964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023975233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022308114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114404075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041573904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018644086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030164123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414595108","doi":"10.17803/2713-0533.2025.3.33.635-666","title":"Criminal Offenses in Public Procurement in Albania: A Legal and Institutional Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kutafin Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Procurement; Enforcement; Law enforcement; Call for bids; Audit; Criminal law; Money laundering","score_opus":0.05055157622112452,"score_gpt":0.36455892634233356,"score_spread":0.31400735012120906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414595108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9567874,0.0034459194,0.0012169708,0.003091855,0.000029696981,0.00011473686,0.00012313237,0.000013565496,0.035176698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947266,0.0015278837,0.00042176104,0.00019505258,0.00003432621,0.000029770075,0.000059837093,0.0000021530025,0.003002724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977176,0.00083249004,0.00016818356,0.00013625532,0.000564879,0.0005806919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450725,0.0022011152,0.0021337846,0.00021422964,0.0007279873,0.00021565756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023717901,0.00015196345,0.0002773175,0.0048259185,0.003023875,0.0020524715,0.0006490481,0.0006936008,0.003452034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005022222,0.0001927561,0.0003012033,0.0037157037,0.003040053,0.0010672905,0.0021436296,0.00092690886,0.0002473847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022607303,0.0006951437,0.40675944,0.0012954597,0.00013244092,0.01994108,0.0314288,0.007164904,0.00223118,0.34266913,0.011018169,0.17643826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003387794,0.00027075526,0.837553,0.0011262738,0.00014980887,0.0050174375,0.05538326,0.008930362,0.0017160175,0.034162965,0.05554053,0.000115704825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027438417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040306352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027438417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049265907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004515857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054557383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414861736","doi":"10.1093/9780191991295.001.0001","title":"Administrative Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Tribunal; Public law; Judicial review; Core (optical fiber); Immigration; Common law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.0646369657806431,"score_gpt":0.3919091224871435,"score_spread":0.3272721567065004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414861736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034276815,0.006141689,0.0042317985,0.008495539,0.0012631195,0.00005148234,0.0001553248,0.00009283194,0.9792254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030580757,0.0042355433,0.002454209,0.0075052567,0.0023503872,0.00017156386,0.0002823732,0.0001657264,0.9522543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969875,0.0008023821,0.00016968418,0.000579058,0.0011766066,0.00028477737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768794,0.00091963034,0.00012044021,0.0003806589,0.0007927373,0.000098619785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019856223,0.0007017389,0.00049207447,0.0014584229,0.0038868962,0.008558144,0.0012197992,0.0033660512,0.051615886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047756275,0.00037610438,0.0004611432,0.0016959365,0.0076879025,0.005831305,0.00256896,0.0050039175,0.023152484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013522911,0.0000041659373,0.000017704397,0.000018759338,6.669372e-7,0.000012579058,0.00024317946,0.00008099587,0.00002615747,0.89754367,0.09321986,0.008830893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013932193,0.0000033167514,0.000049490834,0.000090897454,6.059212e-7,0.000021959937,0.00009895964,0.000091197624,0.00003181518,0.07374462,0.92586285,0.000002921061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008599626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060845944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051615886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075125224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052351207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17267239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415816470","doi":"10.37419/jpl.v12.i1.3","title":"A Comparison of Inadequate Doctrines: The Canadian “honour of the Crown” and the U.S. Federal Trust Responsibility","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Journal of Property Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Public policy; Legislation","score_opus":0.04022887612960438,"score_gpt":0.34592552691432343,"score_spread":0.3056966507847191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415816470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09357402,0.02344581,0.0076960754,0.18423666,0.0020759557,0.000114142385,0.00018271744,0.00006902307,0.68860555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652916,0.0053717596,0.0022551802,0.014546444,0.00030100773,0.000039731523,0.00006563684,0.00005386888,0.012074771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97673094,0.0040830052,0.00058374536,0.0010525609,0.012609184,0.0049405964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801358,0.0067723235,0.001009943,0.0008523134,0.00943537,0.0017941294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010018635,0.0003757589,0.0006995455,0.004584771,0.027537283,0.014757407,0.0028389127,0.0044338303,0.0029468532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028042778,0.00033644482,0.0006766962,0.0052454607,0.046246883,0.005179025,0.005388829,0.00891234,0.00016994045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010620248,0.0000063928774,0.0005384408,0.000037070677,0.0000049070236,0.00007373594,0.014014778,0.00013943853,0.00006728713,0.9715201,0.005657598,0.007929572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044360953,0.000052954052,0.014387159,0.001277201,0.00010923671,0.0002683275,0.10678153,0.00144494,0.0007736892,0.30109113,0.5735679,0.00020141191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96969396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97987956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14968583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14968583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22711395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415871654","doi":"10.7202/1121062ar","title":"Les conséquences de la violation de l’article 1275 du <i>Code civil du Québec</i>  : réflexions sur l’affaire <i>Fiducie Historia</i>","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Private life; Context (archaeology); Historicity (philosophy)","score_opus":0.013113354954964082,"score_gpt":0.2650076163842669,"score_spread":0.2518942614293028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415871654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26966995,0.0064289956,0.0043679345,0.09988719,0.0009348194,0.000096357064,0.00066743034,0.00007231692,0.61787504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8805365,0.0014323723,0.0008786908,0.01134955,0.00010061824,0.000036262387,0.00008621409,0.000028902456,0.105550915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720097,0.00042983558,0.000064973436,0.0002758874,0.0012309507,0.0007972917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674964,0.00092186936,0.00033000615,0.00013668223,0.0015081431,0.0003537928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023176607,0.00026118782,0.00020059197,0.0009466534,0.012602512,0.0066218292,0.0012223974,0.0033955937,0.008606754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061176266,0.0002380353,0.00034264295,0.0010756473,0.008484212,0.0014207818,0.0016945219,0.004667904,0.0005201917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040365274,0.000028645549,0.010609984,0.00011322513,0.000028703578,0.0007843093,0.036554735,0.00073196215,0.0010746816,0.8573476,0.07048565,0.022200184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037226717,0.00007524287,0.087736934,0.00070135767,0.0001037625,0.00032494272,0.061512083,0.0017412674,0.0037840407,0.049596544,0.7941421,0.0002443728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9600782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9814968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05151417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05151417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054697335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3737632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415983967","doi":"10.56397/slj.2025.10.01","title":"Analysis of Breen v Williams: A Critical Examination of the Doctor-Patient Fiduciary Relationship","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Law and Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Legislature; Divergence (linguistics); Empirical examination; Medical law; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.05882619581379661,"score_gpt":0.4030037334883899,"score_spread":0.3441775376745933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415983967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059556197,0.027714515,0.015221663,0.5660419,0.0036203775,0.00025263173,0.00007672083,0.00004325102,0.32747284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81335115,0.0090484405,0.0037687116,0.1496916,0.0018089598,0.0002929956,0.00003106998,0.00008155942,0.021925395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.977119,0.014284322,0.0006228399,0.0017129037,0.0037696913,0.002491224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9406332,0.053613205,0.0012226558,0.0008961483,0.0028418407,0.00079290936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03529149,0.00047686827,0.0009370548,0.0036361904,0.017862603,0.011484994,0.00253855,0.018249901,0.0026969034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059992924,0.00077087805,0.00091138325,0.002244404,0.053039465,0.012428723,0.00833702,0.02363422,0.0002995595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074272193,0.0000056550316,0.000091216774,0.000040042,0.000004050251,0.00039008408,0.023992458,0.00007492018,0.000045768447,0.9649383,0.007968947,0.0024412025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025688048,0.00004594569,0.0008441439,0.0016209749,0.000038252892,0.0005578883,0.051923983,0.00073415367,0.00059199485,0.5494357,0.3940961,0.00008525762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04865834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055271484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04865834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022756374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0242065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18664151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416060786","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192843364.003.0020","title":"Conditions, Warranties, and Indemnities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Warranty; Collateral; Principal (computer security); Process (computing); Indemnity","score_opus":0.028772706851463395,"score_gpt":0.24856259428184263,"score_spread":0.21978988743037925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416060786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006294603,0.01103739,0.013354924,0.008396927,0.0006097291,0.000047440983,0.00012986755,0.000057674006,0.96007156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6479963,0.016261205,0.014406798,0.0028827393,0.0017329812,0.00029744697,0.00028587182,0.00012300196,0.31601378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768543,0.0008535156,0.00010989839,0.00024784345,0.0009292902,0.00017391545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982292,0.0009956533,0.00012863828,0.00018234117,0.00034448094,0.000119701144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019002245,0.0004245981,0.00035805447,0.0017151372,0.0021255033,0.0053891763,0.000874731,0.0020591365,0.01311653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048626987,0.00028040606,0.00025066474,0.0012101929,0.015488669,0.006320857,0.0021802597,0.0032037287,0.0014585486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013322705,0.0000015471182,0.000013459651,0.000010756451,2.9729156e-7,0.000013112134,0.00029140065,0.000049342034,0.00002034571,0.99594516,0.0015854432,0.0020678393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005380016,0.000013982435,0.00021480175,0.00027124627,0.0000032167513,0.00010805082,0.0007462756,0.0003253748,0.00013771745,0.76942223,0.2287422,0.000009614332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050555663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051143817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01311653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005305754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035546788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04387921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416060787","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192843364.003.0021","title":"Exemption Clauses and Unfair Contract Terms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Statutory law; Good faith; Presumption; Transparency (behavior); Liability; Legislation; Fair dealing; Bad faith; Force majeure","score_opus":0.02664558043709554,"score_gpt":0.25336864684147453,"score_spread":0.226723066404379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416060787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007665257,0.00960127,0.04334614,0.00897408,0.0006789775,0.00011045778,0.0001233346,0.00005574469,0.9294448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58220565,0.012170991,0.033546563,0.009372519,0.0016872813,0.00079039275,0.0005113643,0.0002188882,0.3594963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903016,0.003044953,0.00039410012,0.0006573481,0.0050172633,0.00058475777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950229,0.0031307181,0.0003438108,0.0006045414,0.0007333917,0.00016461915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004903644,0.0004975257,0.00048292018,0.0019163239,0.0025722526,0.0059290538,0.001774284,0.0034747864,0.010415871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010255991,0.00045333133,0.0004421991,0.0017399043,0.016571453,0.0067206365,0.0039168303,0.008218745,0.0024207665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.698764e-7,0.000001483883,0.0000068008,0.000006211356,2.390644e-7,0.000008845359,0.00018287165,0.000050588515,0.000022481618,0.9977754,0.00065865065,0.0012858212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047425137,0.000007643776,0.00007451177,0.00023552564,0.0000018416338,0.00006708385,0.00023129398,0.00032884054,0.00017531362,0.84694695,0.15191765,0.000008631962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027646916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017485121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010415871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004299339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003927837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034844577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416178518","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5740622","title":"Justiciability in Private Law: Religion and Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Politics; Private law; Pretext; Political question; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.013796972780394998,"score_gpt":0.3233216466392558,"score_spread":0.3095246738588608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416178518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18676876,0.011047734,0.02392127,0.16374983,0.0006181987,0.000059386795,0.0002458633,0.000042116684,0.61354685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875377,0.001023174,0.00068277895,0.0013228538,0.00044916544,0.000025133846,0.000023058263,0.000014135754,0.008922088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695325,0.0016256197,0.00010855271,0.00036532918,0.0005880946,0.00035923236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97957706,0.01596719,0.0013037536,0.001297911,0.0010779278,0.0007761772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004546524,0.00020227731,0.0007149186,0.0014470841,0.003660921,0.007285759,0.00075190875,0.004868138,0.010997694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016143396,0.00033896443,0.0003363018,0.0020740386,0.025357837,0.0074976757,0.0025694354,0.005267889,0.0005231759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047960207,0.000016322547,0.00023828085,0.000011365791,0.0000025343413,0.000012769973,0.0005321928,0.00007796675,0.00002010839,0.996234,0.0010508421,0.0017988209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006441617,0.00000301422,0.0005421831,0.000016062822,0.000001595635,0.000011051971,0.00029490158,0.00021418954,0.000020914515,0.99519676,0.0036899226,0.0000030245603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004737109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004290772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010997694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035386782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027587372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036790907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290307","doi":"10.29173/alr2813","title":"Charter Rights and Regulation by Financial Incentives","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Charter; Covert; Incentive; Unconscionability; Financial crisis","score_opus":0.008242287274447011,"score_gpt":0.29370485345825875,"score_spread":0.2854625661838117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012205591,0.01554394,0.0618894,0.1030954,0.0016751188,0.00014157422,0.00019710729,0.00017934365,0.8050726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79985756,0.015371838,0.025129292,0.036088865,0.0036500078,0.0006473938,0.0001954864,0.00016012571,0.11889929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98102885,0.0077133933,0.00078731775,0.0024116002,0.006072828,0.0019859988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98473597,0.009172801,0.0017598522,0.0018646636,0.0020004844,0.00046623434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018393032,0.00056602614,0.0009343401,0.0020418726,0.0044475095,0.009565392,0.0020558438,0.009398093,0.006207078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025062542,0.0005317585,0.0011227123,0.0016017777,0.031958677,0.01047813,0.004127046,0.008883657,0.001075987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014268963,0.0000023568164,0.000018349663,0.0000067333613,6.661427e-7,0.0000048867914,0.00007094807,0.00009713834,0.000013232822,0.9975024,0.0009916467,0.0012902613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018516437,0.000018935685,0.00018303498,0.00016638718,0.000005847865,0.000033010943,0.00008362229,0.0004448707,0.00015544958,0.9094749,0.08939388,0.000021547929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016006976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009166452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018393032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007737123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09727275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416431124","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198890485.013.0001","title":"Formalities and Secret Trusts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Doctrine; Intersection (aeronautics); Enforcement; Compliance (psychology); Common law; Estoppel; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.026503509567070604,"score_gpt":0.24187770267086064,"score_spread":0.21537419310379005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416431124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04392819,0.008624406,0.047242504,0.020827185,0.00044028592,0.000060678012,0.00007573309,0.00010557645,0.8786954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96503264,0.0028725183,0.0031167825,0.0007409551,0.0002102733,0.00004043277,0.000036300436,0.000027752543,0.027922342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965473,0.001603775,0.00014679326,0.00029483973,0.0010113542,0.00039594396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941748,0.0036294956,0.0005754486,0.00072786893,0.00059725274,0.0002952614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037783002,0.0002990379,0.0002838073,0.0012419577,0.0020429378,0.0060072877,0.0005852635,0.0012513013,0.0071173436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084252935,0.00023430554,0.00030931676,0.0009748914,0.018828442,0.007647788,0.0034006033,0.0029132876,0.0005817181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011824037,0.0000019479655,0.000027957376,0.000007161475,5.327428e-7,0.000010142879,0.00030152992,0.000107006235,0.000012053503,0.9977981,0.00032934287,0.0014031361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004672449,0.000007598164,0.0001244855,0.000105613515,0.0000026647756,0.000054110744,0.00051653053,0.0005673292,0.000081124475,0.9594951,0.03903464,0.000006153415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033483002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017334373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071173436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059616794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028639883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04325527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416527739","doi":"10.1017/9781009322737.002","title":"Guiding Principles","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.07003704338495115,"score_gpt":0.2577120601221531,"score_spread":0.18767501673720194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416527739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052285654,0.0007500124,0.021642504,0.010880999,0.0005929823,0.00016861212,0.0001832155,0.00014992067,0.96510893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06427564,0.0018128599,0.036346547,0.012790993,0.0008735965,0.0012297886,0.00052961626,0.0005494814,0.88159144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99183875,0.0030210824,0.0003293682,0.00087905594,0.0031425655,0.0007890722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963096,0.00120188,0.00013842837,0.0006832026,0.0014074763,0.00025935922],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077715917,0.0010570352,0.0008120968,0.0022138078,0.005073423,0.011919626,0.0028556243,0.0066437214,0.05363037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012265115,0.00083587965,0.0007363282,0.0014566913,0.010914243,0.0061721993,0.0039320104,0.007216952,0.02809754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014192934,0.000007939849,0.000011922603,0.000015550895,8.433635e-7,0.000006165812,0.00026303876,0.00004096412,0.000016276852,0.9680876,0.027329259,0.0042190207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070050746,0.0000044125036,0.00003976738,0.00011251901,0.0000024850106,0.000028011294,0.0002687127,0.00013652077,0.00010666586,0.5964624,0.40282506,0.000006354969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009228905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011175295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94636965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006590858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009377849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17941147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416909287","doi":"10.1177/07398913251394086a","title":"Book Review: <i>Authority</i> by Jonathon Leeman <i>Authority</i> . By LeemanJonathon. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. 312pp. $22.99.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Christian Education Journal Research on Educational Ministry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Taylor College and Seminary","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03496794561304315,"score_gpt":0.44628161230144975,"score_spread":0.4113136666884066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416909287","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002885182,0.45843706,0.0007775544,0.048598405,0.059822142,0.00019631429,0.0019469974,0.0009042181,0.42902878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012371268,0.10940556,0.00044964164,0.011259576,0.010148783,0.00009999634,0.0010389681,0.0002771381,0.86608326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945015,0.0000622879,0.000032239896,0.000067145214,0.00034659333,0.000041547017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779606,0.00064030045,0.00016881645,0.000060037302,0.0010264758,0.0003083712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069422176,0.001394731,0.0011929623,0.002362373,0.0007981175,0.0026668569,0.0013369318,0.0017183224,0.29784152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003926675,0.00057464873,0.00052115944,0.0029422448,0.0005398904,0.0029014812,0.0012627593,0.002445489,0.27968407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026644736,0.000002233639,0.000009163904,0.00008366191,7.238975e-7,0.0000051598845,0.000005040986,0.000006874753,0.000015766494,0.00010983788,0.98487824,0.014880685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026455418,0.000004775473,0.00011364573,0.00027715447,0.0000018321759,0.00005123509,0.000014369597,0.000009498829,0.000016330318,0.00013649784,0.9993685,0.0000034661955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067626657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019313626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29784152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013023565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021351867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99637914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417194292","doi":"10.7202/1119960ar","title":"“Disorderly Conduct\": Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.17307554263690136,"score_gpt":0.46330803512285196,"score_spread":0.2902324924859506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417194292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025442436,0.07373878,0.03794256,0.34205955,0.03962848,0.00035586755,0.0017703449,0.00031170715,0.4787503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5785294,0.06503591,0.019221673,0.12342396,0.05303657,0.0013575818,0.0017105053,0.00050072937,0.15718366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984358,0.0007799855,0.0001172917,0.00020394617,0.00027641086,0.00018665138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971686,0.0015124592,0.00020227324,0.00013585086,0.0006085888,0.0003721187],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022055726,0.00077267294,0.00055151136,0.0023662364,0.0028009166,0.0038897255,0.0012709892,0.0032961534,0.008837952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003870674,0.00026042396,0.00040790622,0.0014770644,0.012372284,0.0043608933,0.0037503096,0.0063707563,0.0016096224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000142004,0.00003088989,0.0009872168,0.00030853337,0.0000039682072,0.00017754048,0.006142778,0.00008335333,0.00014731823,0.89242333,0.070899665,0.02878128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007874703,0.00004298251,0.0032108005,0.001229504,0.000012748087,0.00076669385,0.008724465,0.00023887065,0.0002191016,0.3058625,0.67965335,0.00003107332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057604103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008742706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99116206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023309316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034608885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02956587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417288380","doi":"10.1017/9781009356848.017","title":"Index","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Sample (material); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.026103486427772465,"score_gpt":0.2644696399017833,"score_spread":0.23836615347401083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417288380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008368643,0.010326545,0.0029346878,0.010679324,0.016853597,0.0012979333,0.16565636,0.003739278,0.78767544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026482195,0.0103721535,0.0015617596,0.0019557662,0.005025267,0.0006139958,0.07357901,0.0009961065,0.90324783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985728,0.00011022927,0.00019807767,0.00016583898,0.00084244163,0.00011059918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258786,0.00079436286,0.00045164415,0.0005102077,0.0049505746,0.00070528296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010117294,0.0010700664,0.0010486061,0.008659556,0.0013602348,0.00568107,0.0013774886,0.0008887838,0.72772586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010821399,0.00043485803,0.0005712049,0.010174502,0.0003775517,0.0033116797,0.0016405509,0.0012710715,0.6387779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017043276,0.000010307775,0.00008230268,0.00036183503,0.0000018154387,0.000015130582,0.00002265898,0.00005328104,0.00008699953,0.0011737826,0.95134866,0.046826176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031858722,0.000010010457,0.00036094862,0.00021017205,0.0000020976574,0.000014782352,0.000026806163,0.000014144053,0.00005153878,0.00061856734,0.9986835,0.0000042222096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075161746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006214701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27227414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022274018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031881249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417383891","doi":"10.5040/9781509937820","title":"Medical Negligence and the Duty to Advise","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Autonomy; Duty; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Damages; Supreme court; Medical malpractice; Medical law","score_opus":0.020722405484008295,"score_gpt":0.2971743930613344,"score_spread":0.27645198757732614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417383891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062401793,0.028045008,0.004528077,0.33414015,0.00440991,0.000041406733,0.000055247663,0.000041705745,0.6224982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5617122,0.016935216,0.0038947642,0.16511132,0.006353004,0.00015668335,0.000083361716,0.00005704272,0.24569644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489224,0.0019263306,0.00023958531,0.00036212234,0.0019414973,0.00063822436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965197,0.0021723858,0.00034307718,0.00022026758,0.00040232835,0.00034223017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020503874,0.00025158608,0.00025284762,0.00070344866,0.0039421567,0.0040212576,0.0011693331,0.008989068,0.006739701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075689848,0.00032344236,0.0003750453,0.00047146008,0.019397773,0.0050201775,0.0026871457,0.006521038,0.001253769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045359816,0.000008419904,0.00015873277,0.000039832015,0.0000018831313,0.00013999744,0.0032069262,0.000086762324,0.00003586374,0.9302321,0.0577056,0.008379425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009971642,0.000023875802,0.0010084442,0.00044548925,0.0000037439402,0.00069237675,0.0021402368,0.00021908383,0.0000980991,0.31065485,0.68468744,0.00001638983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011468127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0138952425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011468127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039631077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073178336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028754532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417415110","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2599683","title":"Non-ideal justice in holdings, or rectification revisited","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Rectification; Work (physics); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.07263389805258906,"score_gpt":0.43750807838300854,"score_spread":0.36487418033041946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417415110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046970773,0.024123175,0.20013905,0.13108695,0.0014364114,0.000101788406,0.0001179148,0.00016955766,0.59585434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513344,0.0036126643,0.011189324,0.0066704587,0.0009241102,0.00013342494,0.000039892464,0.0001180759,0.025977679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98933405,0.0040916684,0.0004144237,0.0019290099,0.002790808,0.0014400249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951911,0.002683868,0.00049039564,0.0010070732,0.00044858718,0.00017899484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011102558,0.0005362406,0.0007958171,0.0021473814,0.0059594754,0.009105803,0.003317174,0.0064252736,0.0050339373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009203306,0.00059014006,0.001588849,0.0015403918,0.090817586,0.02222925,0.006780333,0.012090534,0.0006249946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.508772e-7,0.0000010734432,0.00001247111,0.0000054073416,5.982252e-7,0.000009396636,0.0003041975,0.000048777314,0.000010464397,0.9990081,0.00012940854,0.00046919446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053464787,0.000003465559,0.000051521452,0.00003291284,0.0000021701335,0.000032428416,0.00029941846,0.00017686104,0.00004789352,0.9865285,0.01281548,0.0000039956262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054678195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038118765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011102558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01014707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055595967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073622465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417465812","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198890485.013.0044","title":"Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Trust law; Work (physics); Private law; Public law","score_opus":0.022218184594640512,"score_gpt":0.24023430314613695,"score_spread":0.21801611855149644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417465812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006817151,0.0052572354,0.0022509603,0.007345361,0.005556395,0.000096970645,0.0018887976,0.00046561094,0.97645694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073441407,0.0050778342,0.0019025884,0.0028601864,0.0017123958,0.0001186861,0.0022899215,0.00035275583,0.97834146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990601,0.00014806465,0.00005291449,0.00021655459,0.00040072724,0.000121690384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992229,0.00014361252,0.000038292666,0.00011560099,0.00034780972,0.00013183565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006318477,0.0008328243,0.00055896933,0.0015536353,0.002250335,0.0060106083,0.0016066463,0.0027951754,0.46581805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025806807,0.00032301,0.0006153343,0.0016891315,0.0009995311,0.0046335324,0.00341592,0.002439443,0.25354704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032582884,0.000042698477,0.00020262154,0.0003189956,0.0000040764608,0.00014729338,0.0007446186,0.00013841591,0.00024611648,0.14684878,0.72150415,0.12976961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012700575,0.0000049406726,0.00008491462,0.00010167293,6.932017e-7,0.00004421104,0.00010710961,0.000014169318,0.00003274275,0.0034277414,0.9961784,0.000002134786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036761991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034528326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53418195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027458065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023582927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7619457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417465832","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198890485.013.0027","title":"Pension Funds","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Flexibility (engineering); Statute; Foundation (evidence); Private pension; Common law","score_opus":0.03785018371329782,"score_gpt":0.2577625652979564,"score_spread":0.21991238158465856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417465832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017254935,0.0057046185,0.0009425089,0.003738106,0.00067618804,0.000040336334,0.00094128546,0.00015027968,0.98608124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022539945,0.0030448781,0.00051414303,0.0005545217,0.00024084488,0.000043569114,0.0005210518,0.00004819452,0.9724929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940586,0.00008918047,0.000030284107,0.000092268914,0.00027338875,0.00010906663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997311,0.00004529285,0.000024855528,0.000050858987,0.00010868206,0.0000390793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070886436,0.0004095907,0.0002695313,0.0014125198,0.0013948618,0.0043234504,0.0005869424,0.0017759968,0.12196295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020862364,0.00021962101,0.000261149,0.0014070047,0.00056782906,0.002124481,0.0016287247,0.0016817566,0.04459405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022926431,0.000013852084,0.000262066,0.00009297371,0.0000038444064,0.00006190467,0.0004914708,0.00023423404,0.00015589393,0.6514251,0.23546188,0.11177384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015277169,0.0000030574818,0.00016117745,0.000040916184,9.604639e-7,0.000028414855,0.00003847941,0.000027155462,0.00003764985,0.005938266,0.99372077,0.0000015490175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010661772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008664916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12196295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032855286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031127124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40800673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417465864","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198890485.013.0012","title":"Trustee Liability for Trust Claims and Trust Creditors’ Direct Access to Trust Assets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Express trust; Trust law; Liability; Blind trust; Security interest; Debtor; Balance (ability); Settlor","score_opus":0.04234674374534089,"score_gpt":0.2958059287846187,"score_spread":0.2534591850392778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417465864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051675122,0.0054565254,0.014473874,0.011138061,0.00017057855,0.000036468173,0.0001459584,0.000045458102,0.916858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372916,0.0021061813,0.001023266,0.000410566,0.0001733756,0.00003438317,0.00006999826,0.00001583149,0.05887474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628973,0.0016252111,0.00020892816,0.00024930373,0.0011799517,0.0004468619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98769134,0.007963304,0.0012018183,0.0011040269,0.0014416518,0.00059789687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004021017,0.00022302604,0.00026906942,0.0015719091,0.0018675056,0.007002164,0.00085292215,0.0031181003,0.01806511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018385595,0.0002080225,0.00031262776,0.0017815222,0.0086595435,0.0062187016,0.0034967128,0.0027626574,0.0012048365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066911475,0.000010209487,0.00050869846,0.000017244449,0.0000028591317,0.00008404149,0.0013170138,0.00031007951,0.00003466057,0.9906307,0.0021651809,0.0049126646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011525668,0.000022756949,0.0026930398,0.00029143592,0.0000147586325,0.0003206095,0.0016889594,0.0023751662,0.00015671163,0.9330342,0.059371967,0.000018843859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008270542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065393555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01806511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005269743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031025894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060433865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513428","doi":"10.1086/738305","title":": <i>Wrongs and Rights Come Apart</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Bill of rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.043773567484217395,"score_gpt":0.40163271503043807,"score_spread":0.35785914754622067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041691363,0.0090200715,0.01238357,0.7187349,0.007563448,0.00003670756,0.00013624447,0.000057637295,0.24789827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45317772,0.008246267,0.008870078,0.42072955,0.018446514,0.0003648707,0.00017438353,0.00021203245,0.08977848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98581576,0.007879068,0.0006368155,0.0017361329,0.002653341,0.0012788824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98376775,0.010408037,0.0011585486,0.0012990754,0.0024780147,0.00088856294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011860272,0.00072814093,0.0011870329,0.0019414066,0.008670578,0.015641337,0.002098055,0.022598216,0.01367118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022369327,0.00051292946,0.0009291632,0.0024297072,0.07780391,0.026637234,0.006745006,0.018569527,0.0035321452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035211028,0.0000055649675,0.00005624343,0.000033556444,0.0000036377594,0.00002272982,0.0015061488,0.000023349088,0.000024233153,0.9613135,0.0347054,0.0023020396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004142544,0.000002803702,0.000108184846,0.0001256854,0.0000044021604,0.000078212535,0.0016351636,0.0000553361,0.000049328406,0.9388622,0.059064757,0.00000979378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010041062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007695967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022598216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005866943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0097958995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062723815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W45778138","doi":"","title":"PROBING THE FRONTIERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Citizenship; Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Immigration; Jurisprudence; Commission; Common law; High Court; Sociology","score_opus":0.04596288215636862,"score_gpt":0.23325606677219998,"score_spread":0.18729318461583136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W45778138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10744999,0.03888141,0.007993137,0.49392217,0.00072818226,0.000049352184,0.000053513842,0.000034070985,0.35088825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96813077,0.008548299,0.0015768497,0.015321975,0.00082306477,0.00005787194,0.000016782531,0.000019651103,0.005504704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96446556,0.022582987,0.0007762927,0.0020271991,0.005840403,0.0043074987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9291434,0.058668863,0.0027958616,0.0022732923,0.0043733087,0.0027451846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04014594,0.00027523004,0.0007631061,0.00526216,0.016456718,0.029964633,0.0020842636,0.00997067,0.0043275063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036437504,0.0008396235,0.00088755495,0.004482746,0.09997884,0.030614,0.009277418,0.016430605,0.00058277696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005332384,0.000014409648,0.0004397,0.000035568537,0.0000017447293,0.000059786787,0.013987739,0.00009300964,0.00004813575,0.97821015,0.0013886028,0.0057157874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000103967795,0.00004318944,0.0049859546,0.0006747659,0.0000069764737,0.00015384587,0.054899793,0.0010867858,0.00015847731,0.7934481,0.14449811,0.00003352606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021168469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02487544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04014594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027656902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025655227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2123146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W48464655","doi":"10.29173/alr370","title":"Prior Occupation and Schismatic Principles: Toward a Normative Theorization of Aboriginal Title","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Proxy (statistics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Function (biology); Political science; Identity (music); Natural (archaeology); Computer science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052617168008824364,"score_gpt":0.3695288195396225,"score_spread":0.31691165153079814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W48464655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030420814,0.008636837,0.084535696,0.09112493,0.0007938951,0.0001063678,0.00008894341,0.00006457862,0.7842279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91957814,0.0036708494,0.02207356,0.011651225,0.00095202646,0.00032020893,0.00007067466,0.00006139933,0.041621767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894944,0.0053967703,0.00037012994,0.0008542396,0.003050542,0.0008339762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416286,0.003271138,0.00041683207,0.00059026043,0.0012963209,0.00026258823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015097537,0.00036128407,0.0005629258,0.0025946393,0.006533085,0.0067136562,0.002799662,0.0054885326,0.0029153065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009326956,0.00046892825,0.0005957315,0.0017438144,0.061323505,0.0089478865,0.0038896147,0.008053949,0.0005824277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8799935e-7,0.0000015876105,0.000018554863,0.0000050019244,3.2440778e-7,0.0000051450647,0.000674545,0.000030085506,0.000007831809,0.99854636,0.00029872952,0.0004112625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046274254,0.000006175926,0.00014431926,0.000072491915,0.0000018894737,0.000024829216,0.0009591294,0.00022761409,0.000056484332,0.9697995,0.028696926,0.0000059908357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018971907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023303485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008949032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012704094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079844415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55456004","doi":"10.7202/029381ar","title":"Reasonable Notice Criteria in Common Law Wrongful Dismissal Cases","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux (Québec); Queen's University; Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services; Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Dismissal; Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.04553619362535167,"score_gpt":0.3428057293681562,"score_spread":0.2972695357428045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55456004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091405,0.0015545802,0.006079843,0.0037866544,0.000106856605,0.00052303,0.00035378436,0.00005073179,0.07840405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977373,0.000072273666,0.0006457437,0.00017893755,0.000022153155,0.00004988854,0.000049201917,0.000007945293,0.0012365893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9328573,0.0154472,0.0058458103,0.0026793415,0.0351208,0.008049542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64790154,0.24105988,0.053446237,0.006800742,0.03953915,0.011252495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03994073,0.00033884004,0.00078596093,0.0085882135,0.006132001,0.008352649,0.0027040152,0.0045708693,0.0055146897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36522132,0.00038356977,0.00077885826,0.008393981,0.007924476,0.0069869985,0.003105412,0.0043073418,0.0006115565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018336838,0.0012891763,0.39972976,0.0004964443,0.00016027801,0.0038601477,0.04539002,0.0073983916,0.003146647,0.44381106,0.013492857,0.079391494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035478733,0.0008654807,0.73396355,0.00075048406,0.0003690932,0.0012135844,0.036610074,0.019191977,0.0021671362,0.17529118,0.028779691,0.00044299805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2058624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30507153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2058624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022291355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024002388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40932828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W561782764","doi":"","title":"Tort law in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Kluwer Law International eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Liability; Strict liability; Duty of care; Liability insurance; Causation; Vicarious liability; Legal liability; Business; Damages; Delict; Product liability; Duty; Joint and several liability; Law; Compensation (psychology); Actuarial science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Private law; Psychology; Public law","score_opus":0.014723750734452938,"score_gpt":0.27285471801736166,"score_spread":0.25813096728290874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W561782764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027466244,0.021334799,0.00073767203,0.012613668,0.0007300471,0.00006421024,0.00046395414,0.000097745105,0.96121126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06560928,0.033241738,0.0016009776,0.0043106894,0.00022954817,0.00006534608,0.00047146218,0.000092964394,0.89437795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979627,0.000104518964,0.00004532014,0.00016406488,0.0011907868,0.0005326867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990237,0.000107261374,0.000025178746,0.00003863395,0.0006213368,0.00018393648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006139354,0.000769975,0.0004886637,0.0032892367,0.015910571,0.008290199,0.0014810644,0.003250955,0.02933643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024905696,0.00061051786,0.00044780623,0.006864841,0.005723519,0.0023255819,0.0021208145,0.0033016894,0.0033393898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053012636,0.000014309918,0.0004625805,0.000087524386,0.0000040174878,0.00021768402,0.001953995,0.0005431225,0.00007854588,0.6969036,0.26270455,0.03702484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023370794,0.000002877992,0.0011593305,0.00017923267,0.0000034047916,0.00007209791,0.00068204576,0.00022307778,0.000033880635,0.015736775,0.9818912,0.000013595769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12677236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12677236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18245703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9198021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570597377","doi":"","title":"CHANGING CANADIAN CUSTOMS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation & distribution","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Subtitle; International trade; Transport engineering; Marketing; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.012451854738148454,"score_gpt":0.27158047976616645,"score_spread":0.259128625028018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570597377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015333627,0.0021778466,0.0014157066,0.075384,0.0043973355,0.00023166006,0.009145141,0.0006919846,0.8912226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08971931,0.0025524343,0.0037694497,0.018754395,0.00040269917,0.00008203734,0.00276995,0.0003127233,0.8816369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533206,0.00011563936,0.00009030815,0.0002557044,0.0032118324,0.0009944671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918058,0.00025244078,0.00012136684,0.00026251737,0.0067921975,0.0007656194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014865728,0.0005474493,0.00027975184,0.003095758,0.01307647,0.00590966,0.0017295083,0.0026523974,0.065438434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006809944,0.00041889588,0.00072310166,0.004042859,0.0023373354,0.0017543773,0.0015296544,0.0033735875,0.006730183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014662325,0.000014046074,0.002200507,0.000083027655,0.000006820039,0.00015011184,0.0013027935,0.00028680143,0.00048553193,0.05653243,0.91193277,0.026990432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005033732,0.0000056559506,0.006480238,0.00007594388,0.000009133898,0.000041277133,0.0010634179,0.00014643508,0.00032558446,0.0010183228,0.9907917,0.000037280322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10849113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10849113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18481779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78716195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572287427","doi":"","title":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Legal liability; Public law; Law; Government (linguistics); Tort; Strict liability; Political science","score_opus":0.02775398419859881,"score_gpt":0.26745899328560774,"score_spread":0.23970500908700892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W572287427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040174713,0.03945522,0.0068745124,0.032293867,0.0040383986,0.000084199724,0.00008004346,0.000098474,0.91305786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1853538,0.04940866,0.0036328093,0.016151087,0.00516446,0.00015902164,0.00016647027,0.000078032645,0.7398856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973673,0.00056266104,0.00013753575,0.0001988623,0.0014861727,0.0002473935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974553,0.0018055629,0.00019230595,0.00016068743,0.00029150202,0.00009462557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013265862,0.0003892662,0.0003940503,0.0010456821,0.0023289942,0.0050593144,0.0009829524,0.00373085,0.0044767023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050053946,0.00043447022,0.00043171836,0.0007363366,0.006862725,0.0032306043,0.0017820885,0.0045982595,0.0016414587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041237076,0.00001664316,0.00017933945,0.000109705405,0.0000040298573,0.00028427845,0.0023387722,0.00063597696,0.00014443281,0.80336946,0.15846287,0.03445041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038727258,0.000021220189,0.00081268576,0.000771267,0.000006919119,0.0005847017,0.000992724,0.0005180773,0.00017736331,0.2467306,0.74936247,0.00001815265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008219973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007180148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008219973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004247635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00781914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03081888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W576349480","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264682.001.0001","title":"Childbirth and the Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obstetrics; Childbirth; Medicine; Damages; Liability; Autonomy; Duty of care; Law; Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.01538602908609544,"score_gpt":0.22132244199041992,"score_spread":0.2059364129043245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W576349480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011752334,0.059823304,0.00079089246,0.018965852,0.0017316774,0.000027425245,0.00003484307,0.000038272916,0.9174126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07534316,0.056920912,0.0013525821,0.02213965,0.0020747634,0.00012716213,0.0000910725,0.000077953955,0.84187275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988457,0.00033856567,0.000024954115,0.00010610734,0.00044404774,0.00024061355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946886,0.00024573953,0.00004465903,0.0000643646,0.000098082906,0.00007831703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009487636,0.00045090428,0.00039200572,0.0008497184,0.0046063373,0.005133792,0.0009109592,0.0026682573,0.016941736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002160403,0.0002626111,0.00028683385,0.0009745056,0.015425834,0.0034723682,0.0029224383,0.004284162,0.00373023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025545414,0.000010046392,0.000046542293,0.00003510631,9.558551e-7,0.00006569032,0.0029778148,0.00004056627,0.000028378518,0.91770154,0.06174882,0.017341953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022560127,0.000005432665,0.00016998353,0.00027435948,0.0000010064084,0.00008003215,0.0010640493,0.000020718246,0.000019056984,0.06010085,0.9382586,0.0000036112606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036921687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04625763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036921687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006955356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007720089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07341355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W588156145","doi":"","title":"Agriculture and fisheries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LexisNexis eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Index (typography); Law; Statement (logic); Table of contents; Common law; Geography; Operations research; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.031167857532641167,"score_gpt":0.264406059593497,"score_spread":0.23323820206085583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W588156145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010961714,0.02982965,0.0009176665,0.010978266,0.004982488,0.00005667277,0.0023582496,0.00027389836,0.94950694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013588213,0.019877253,0.0012098158,0.0051780604,0.0010122475,0.0000685748,0.0016512743,0.00014352109,0.9572711],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985066,0.00021124737,0.000109410634,0.0003699731,0.00064368866,0.00015898459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993876,0.00008972901,0.00005955993,0.0001317582,0.00024660057,0.000084748826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009212598,0.0007956579,0.0006162358,0.0018188251,0.0023074963,0.0079396395,0.0009550556,0.0020232429,0.2117428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002538625,0.00028174542,0.00030821696,0.0033017583,0.001911148,0.004148784,0.0034023311,0.0016395529,0.11148408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038414553,0.000021173219,0.00082965515,0.0003398623,0.000010689088,0.00014751145,0.0006189601,0.00008778165,0.00051849487,0.072643586,0.6938077,0.2309361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.340276e-7,0.0000046369155,0.0003821047,0.00009672197,8.836551e-7,0.000044527522,0.00014691358,0.000006923032,0.000024189396,0.0021421097,0.9971474,0.0000028236782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010517046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016783955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2117428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021356277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041624634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70835024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W589137434","doi":"","title":"The Question for the Description of the Law, by Reider Edvinsson","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02927165365649092,"score_gpt":0.3186001657831845,"score_spread":0.2893285121266936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W589137434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061731995,0.035698973,0.002821141,0.91654545,0.0097476365,0.000014007984,0.00010952007,0.000027774851,0.034418225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12209575,0.077798456,0.011974572,0.5834319,0.06123559,0.00030613338,0.00034196823,0.0004782017,0.14233741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930392,0.003187673,0.0004850792,0.0013088622,0.0016080951,0.00037112943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899211,0.0064802733,0.00045710203,0.0007593759,0.0019824114,0.00039983855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124257095,0.0008390641,0.0014929305,0.0018035957,0.0047900295,0.00920312,0.0023530896,0.01381521,0.0069667143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040672574,0.0007113408,0.00089656084,0.0016881588,0.026472969,0.027465055,0.003659083,0.024276955,0.0030834707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105652825,0.000009938397,0.000039689225,0.000049371996,0.00000600577,0.000014108131,0.00038146414,0.00007242798,0.000020122307,0.8311897,0.16491169,0.0032950898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018306257,0.000006734887,0.000098568875,0.00026508397,0.0000054516336,0.000044429533,0.00059150974,0.0001663576,0.000047616635,0.6045495,0.39418176,0.00002469866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01095811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007056875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01381521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005927834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069180448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06571418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W595083468","doi":"","title":"A Neu Neumeier: The Need for a More Flexible Framework for Choice of Law in the State of New York","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Law; Tort; Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Conflict of laws; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Substantive law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12382670485044123,"score_gpt":0.41453086304578335,"score_spread":0.2907041581953421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W595083468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036520094,0.014709651,0.027587175,0.24158654,0.0020676884,0.00023601372,0.00040691983,0.000115592906,0.6767704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73070997,0.00746407,0.017321013,0.015495469,0.0014533502,0.0006917823,0.00018050383,0.00014867126,0.2265351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969151,0.0015168749,0.00016438308,0.00059058354,0.00043217948,0.00038082205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962508,0.0027978588,0.0001832934,0.00017720598,0.00031328405,0.0002775474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649945,0.00042642973,0.00052595296,0.0013353385,0.00779782,0.012815065,0.0019744104,0.006822197,0.01434553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007843255,0.00067577104,0.00043336808,0.001141831,0.013034487,0.015547346,0.0045051044,0.009902771,0.0008493642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022040358,0.000006967157,0.00009372577,0.0000047788085,7.77868e-7,0.000030316121,0.0004295726,0.00020152844,0.000011631086,0.9938683,0.0038734956,0.0014766904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000186941,0.00001209503,0.00066501135,0.00021484596,0.000008166029,0.00004765186,0.0013455376,0.0038800037,0.00012883844,0.7808235,0.21280314,0.00005245761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15400831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16474368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15400831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021452636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012631508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3062238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W609729940","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Contract and the Administration of the Goods of Another Person in the New Civil Code. A Comparative Outlook","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Fiduciary; Civil code; Order (exchange); Legislation; Romanian; Administration (probate law); Code (set theory); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Legal certainty; Business; Economics; Duty; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.05235807959325799,"score_gpt":0.35292759156295694,"score_spread":0.30056951196969894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W609729940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034430813,0.08164484,0.002089163,0.015000924,0.00057351176,0.000019405268,0.00011030833,0.000012677905,0.8661183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9011565,0.03053142,0.0019109609,0.003080284,0.0013361279,0.00006526252,0.00015523375,0.00005306038,0.061711114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947137,0.0029226248,0.000098132055,0.0004026512,0.0010411543,0.00082170457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794585,0.00071535143,0.0003881834,0.00020652944,0.0005354019,0.00020868314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028646935,0.00036152665,0.0005044636,0.0037243369,0.0035962122,0.008954608,0.0008189471,0.0026827776,0.007272118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040866723,0.0002714456,0.0006454219,0.0032887224,0.01560502,0.007124069,0.0017846989,0.003168496,0.00085731235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006516671,0.0000072145212,0.00018541257,0.00002855097,0.0000025905733,0.000044480304,0.0011410286,0.000061887615,0.0000218168,0.9933408,0.0013508523,0.0038088497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001868811,0.00010189694,0.018007694,0.0009461781,0.00002121064,0.00063290645,0.0077127255,0.00095270097,0.00024416432,0.14297417,0.8283414,0.000046088746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05425117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037240565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05425117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01969347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005157712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14288682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610974288","doi":"","title":"Restitution at the crossroads : a comparative study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Mistake; German; Law; English law; Political science; Position (finance); Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11326347407508004,"score_gpt":0.41395007143190476,"score_spread":0.30068659735682474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W610974288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48946416,0.012073846,0.0009668564,0.008878476,0.00019097421,0.000050866995,0.000074488875,0.000010734834,0.48828956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97896075,0.0030137678,0.00012380721,0.00067454384,0.000031399075,0.00003044432,0.000041271927,0.000014316781,0.017109698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99360836,0.003827166,0.00013670755,0.0002724054,0.0007859731,0.0013694155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379164,0.00406045,0.0006650183,0.00024155363,0.00077164953,0.0004697505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053311735,0.00023948059,0.0004385785,0.0032545186,0.01214868,0.008026602,0.0016472829,0.0024405688,0.012877585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014850675,0.0003142057,0.00033173183,0.006672502,0.012519457,0.009237424,0.006182551,0.0032523968,0.0007758023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009881936,0.0001523923,0.006960623,0.00017394371,0.000016045466,0.0015481274,0.3807438,0.00012885439,0.00014380449,0.5630634,0.011820725,0.035149515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000197012,0.00010860148,0.02828961,0.00085030904,0.00002442281,0.00066185446,0.8102923,0.00021884733,0.00015957523,0.017766636,0.14158514,0.000022972423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06828039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10876554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06828039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014179709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005335426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13576591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W612390946","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.001.0001","title":"Atiyah’s Introduction To The Law Of Contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":371,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Exposition (narrative); Context (archaeology); Comparative law; Legislation; Exclusion clause; Commercial law; Private law; Political science; Sociology; Contract management; Economics; Management; History","score_opus":0.01609054020179672,"score_gpt":0.29241599809850677,"score_spread":0.27632545789671004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W612390946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006606791,0.04590549,0.0063283485,0.020095576,0.0074065696,0.000048087502,0.0003169873,0.000119134915,0.9191191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05809391,0.05667063,0.0096515175,0.011422472,0.0117725525,0.00023741667,0.0004749309,0.0002915505,0.851385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867153,0.0003131018,0.00006274979,0.0001987753,0.0006460183,0.000107931875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.0006543548,0.000049380975,0.00010005309,0.00025079976,0.00007797763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011824048,0.0009143257,0.00059403956,0.0023909826,0.0031422353,0.004686564,0.00091147405,0.0025027085,0.030090692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029288938,0.00046592936,0.0005554929,0.0026056094,0.0056490153,0.004835294,0.0015723536,0.00582885,0.007125837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039683487,0.000009095707,0.000029457025,0.000036910656,0.0000012050974,0.000041206902,0.0005356865,0.00013262674,0.000038115682,0.81118053,0.17336723,0.014623949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015846057,0.0000053479216,0.00010449151,0.00009755744,9.6518e-7,0.0000681138,0.000081734295,0.00012824967,0.000021163405,0.0990707,0.9004152,0.0000050778176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009112583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005296069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030090692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006695597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003384108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100663364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W61433422","doi":"","title":"Making restitution work : the challenge of building sustainable governance and institutional structures in public administration","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Treaty; Economic growth; Negotiation; Land administration; Political science; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04036931427730173,"score_gpt":0.27198694951945096,"score_spread":0.23161763524214923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W61433422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08513785,0.010806689,0.03448424,0.26300964,0.0005325484,0.0001336796,0.00006156382,0.0002821094,0.6055518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525179,0.0036636812,0.005114207,0.00379517,0.00020925366,0.00012774437,0.00003871815,0.00011308904,0.034420237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98102427,0.0130306985,0.00029380454,0.0008295263,0.0018228784,0.0029988477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895173,0.004749476,0.0009426387,0.001574567,0.0011482765,0.002067839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018856978,0.00032558883,0.0004979078,0.0011035826,0.020438476,0.026004545,0.00348965,0.005453287,0.003477006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01323059,0.0003647411,0.00047764575,0.001778709,0.10766705,0.014831419,0.01399744,0.0059168967,0.0011424191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012374736,0.00002426972,0.00049664464,0.00005818429,0.000004063466,0.00010901619,0.032076564,0.00078435347,0.00009994208,0.9355622,0.006315369,0.024457129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014248722,0.000028972467,0.002071678,0.00029856295,0.000007637819,0.00004607781,0.049126584,0.0010532675,0.00028517185,0.7178378,0.22919334,0.000036595582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120466575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12401141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120466575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029674944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05595314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2395308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W620351764","doi":"","title":"The Law of Vendor and Purchaser: The Law and Practice Relating to Contracts for Sale of Land in the Common Law Provinces of Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Vendor; Business; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.015108058075966928,"score_gpt":0.3120203938709943,"score_spread":0.29691233579502735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W620351764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0578194,0.020486116,0.0040100585,0.031102788,0.0005769681,0.00026377235,0.001475529,0.00010544199,0.8841599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50840366,0.008725962,0.003745547,0.0040604733,0.0001096607,0.00006823699,0.00037489508,0.00009110032,0.4744205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675614,0.00023166099,0.00008121796,0.00023523216,0.0015754119,0.001120249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787116,0.0004705872,0.00008553626,0.000094665564,0.001148738,0.00032933085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011953065,0.0004915274,0.0003795913,0.0017461319,0.014795525,0.010211464,0.0024957436,0.004771582,0.007951546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048909932,0.0009612317,0.00032923586,0.00521431,0.008473821,0.002798861,0.0015887422,0.0036897282,0.00068002334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021452128,0.000029791965,0.004397686,0.00008016644,0.000008846413,0.00035243444,0.012608579,0.0010477375,0.00029286998,0.833523,0.113977484,0.03365992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019018249,0.0000251204,0.021636983,0.00049825205,0.000034366112,0.00044853607,0.018564476,0.0023203986,0.0004196071,0.0458563,0.91004765,0.0001292861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116166785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116166785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23718035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84285295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621524309","doi":"","title":"Just cause : the law of summary dismissal in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Canada Law Book","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01880153347540609,"score_gpt":0.24572081091206865,"score_spread":0.22691927743666257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W621524309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008477541,0.0062824213,0.0031653147,0.049175758,0.001217695,0.0001383113,0.0009088814,0.00017739025,0.93045676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26706654,0.0054145507,0.0017907047,0.015989568,0.00073773187,0.00015821175,0.00036567776,0.00022813736,0.70824873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904856,0.0006354051,0.00026780803,0.000726778,0.005007998,0.0028763795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931687,0.0020835144,0.00020452011,0.00033376532,0.0035257167,0.00068383303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003420644,0.0006730625,0.0010008748,0.0027773532,0.018739808,0.016031953,0.0028661063,0.0090749115,0.02381164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023384036,0.0011303503,0.00065256393,0.004353589,0.00841821,0.0038087636,0.0027340907,0.009072426,0.0027353584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021288,0.000013854308,0.00080727244,0.000044237026,0.00001072713,0.00013504179,0.0019501315,0.0003830746,0.00007463685,0.7701396,0.20995525,0.016464973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051903804,0.000020577698,0.0056584333,0.00033885112,0.00008588248,0.00013552727,0.0029615741,0.0016778316,0.00035009638,0.14881264,0.83977884,0.00012796196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9841989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99231017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08817187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08817187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18638557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6397347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W623075741","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198804710.001.0001","title":"The Principles of Equity &amp; Trusts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Equity (law); Doctrine; Constructive trust; Law; Settlor; Common law; Duty; Political science; Context (archaeology); Testamentary trust; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.08612043444867738,"score_gpt":0.3118128033362594,"score_spread":0.22569236888758198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W623075741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014320542,0.0071995053,0.0095195165,0.023658998,0.0011516359,0.000050428185,0.00009704652,0.00006316889,0.9568276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17936309,0.011391221,0.007860077,0.009664187,0.0017263745,0.00022814225,0.00014525703,0.00014609308,0.78947556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965184,0.0010373482,0.00016336281,0.00028027958,0.0016080919,0.0003924877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847,0.00064661587,0.00017178705,0.0001965707,0.0003901975,0.00012486278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019478153,0.00043720854,0.00031765806,0.0007986139,0.0031325878,0.0087965615,0.00089991913,0.0029796301,0.013351278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005320415,0.00037849156,0.00036488127,0.0011130769,0.013671893,0.008027521,0.0030802402,0.0051345276,0.005125438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.684595e-7,0.0000019496333,0.000017414088,0.00001349773,6.166968e-7,0.000012483289,0.00036849437,0.000043547076,0.000014012455,0.97664773,0.018822951,0.0040563555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003455515,0.00000534715,0.00012577133,0.00012985288,0.0000021059761,0.000074172895,0.00046084897,0.00019763224,0.00006979637,0.36866814,0.6302566,0.0000062685795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007608061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061706966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013351278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061493916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005800453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044664502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W623254374","doi":"10.4324/9781843144687","title":"Undue Influence and the Family Home","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Undue influence; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021722077494312587,"score_gpt":0.26871614434351454,"score_spread":0.24699406684920194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W623254374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03760649,0.018745266,0.0037515236,0.022341521,0.00090261764,0.000020895523,0.000025277337,0.000036194648,0.9165702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93585765,0.0042641754,0.0003689835,0.0034694592,0.00039711347,0.000027992282,0.00000877384,0.00001586363,0.0555899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977063,0.001099168,0.000047386722,0.00015695971,0.00044155403,0.00054854737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991003,0.0005129366,0.00009036504,0.000085910586,0.000072170034,0.00013832795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013471165,0.00024477433,0.0002731812,0.00054776657,0.009076778,0.0051344545,0.00081273285,0.0037582994,0.0063998387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002724809,0.00016873189,0.00025869464,0.0005329062,0.02487785,0.0048070303,0.005992491,0.0033119237,0.0004976051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071462955,0.000008120008,0.00020210141,0.000010457196,0.0000015264145,0.00031979816,0.012347881,0.000068224224,0.000028005707,0.9752328,0.005494176,0.0062797274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012542905,0.000037121885,0.001438276,0.00040387068,0.000007062675,0.00089907355,0.023338137,0.00017290194,0.0002095684,0.32573348,0.64771867,0.00002928724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011049894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012890556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011049894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00479095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027535788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034760892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629189181","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879","title":"Re-imagining the Trust","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Trust law; Institution; Blind trust; China; Convention; Express trust; Political science; Law; Voting trust; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.040123497448403114,"score_gpt":0.25787692064704865,"score_spread":0.21775342319864555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W629189181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025393503,0.028063012,0.015405448,0.14676908,0.0028319766,0.00003051043,0.0000424961,0.00007115278,0.78139275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89424485,0.010446646,0.0022021234,0.009781052,0.00091059366,0.000053224114,0.00002253382,0.00009561155,0.08224335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938397,0.0038634674,0.00013332006,0.0004985094,0.0009998882,0.0006651842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962632,0.0022418813,0.00022651746,0.0003941503,0.00044119422,0.00043310373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050884043,0.00058855995,0.00044291056,0.0013756722,0.01004347,0.015522845,0.001307299,0.0064534904,0.0042081163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063831406,0.00029348055,0.00040486627,0.0011771467,0.07794088,0.025318922,0.006714197,0.009529378,0.0009151593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027333476,0.0000024251754,0.000029656447,0.000014243262,6.585954e-7,0.00004746088,0.009751384,0.000049468083,0.000021244734,0.984133,0.0037626983,0.0021849177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005015272,0.000016925042,0.00011798947,0.00024098791,0.0000040526465,0.0001984887,0.02042062,0.0003311169,0.00010844053,0.64478654,0.3337577,0.0000122287975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01713987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016618555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01713987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014561661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009065149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10565275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629226840","doi":"","title":"The Conditions of Civil Liability within the New Civil Code","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal liability; Legislator; Liability; Civil code; Legislation; Obligation; Law; Business; Debtor; Political science; Strict liability; Creditor; Duty; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.029316945606806675,"score_gpt":0.34341895075462553,"score_spread":0.31410200514781883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W629226840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012425572,0.0051792404,0.017819388,0.028591104,0.0022746804,0.00022000415,0.000444335,0.00010334522,0.93294245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72094953,0.0061789607,0.021628045,0.02722462,0.0051739304,0.0012747218,0.00085725606,0.0003052955,0.21640761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720001,0.0052596685,0.0018078731,0.003675701,0.013012591,0.004244098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795824,0.0062360647,0.0014917038,0.0021674663,0.008980168,0.001542179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010785712,0.0006235101,0.0009649993,0.002342077,0.008376025,0.0130351065,0.0016076067,0.00859262,0.015670326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029811148,0.000718077,0.00083164306,0.001610881,0.029209543,0.010574933,0.005072307,0.012997666,0.004406652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042715806,0.0000063378643,0.0001312344,0.000010955558,0.0000016438628,0.00007660845,0.00057502004,0.00007287164,0.000041994106,0.99077004,0.0062440373,0.0020649782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027136313,0.000022830483,0.0014283642,0.00036988736,0.000012418118,0.00044574362,0.0013316409,0.00075114757,0.00026723745,0.5465229,0.44872755,0.00009314699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10420318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071098335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10420318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01955673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026123725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20719326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630523282","doi":"10.5040/9781472560292","title":"Justifying Private Law Remedies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Private law; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Theme (computing); Punishment (psychology); Conflict of laws; Unjust enrichment; Common law; Comparative law; Psychology","score_opus":0.07381252395668485,"score_gpt":0.3005734188868517,"score_spread":0.22676089493016682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W630523282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019496111,0.006467422,0.02331422,0.049497638,0.0013045981,0.00009952739,0.000118030286,0.00017243366,0.89953005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8034778,0.0035356863,0.0077649057,0.005206883,0.0010546859,0.00013937516,0.00011147834,0.00010452405,0.17860478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98638386,0.00444235,0.00039574257,0.0008215056,0.0066078105,0.0013485719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924534,0.003267496,0.0007044279,0.0011427309,0.0020695513,0.00036243588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007890741,0.00057778764,0.00072943413,0.002169408,0.003929481,0.0063048606,0.0017474366,0.0069043776,0.012711214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026307408,0.00035753753,0.00045919602,0.0009855349,0.015555092,0.0073453533,0.005358948,0.006916381,0.0019700816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037782606,0.000009702362,0.000075247066,0.000021402791,0.0000025780441,0.000027433365,0.0003167908,0.00036602942,0.000048365422,0.98592013,0.005432161,0.0077763647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000144696,0.000032381035,0.0005548514,0.00034624245,0.0000137369325,0.00009081953,0.000730965,0.0018596177,0.00040499828,0.8318824,0.16404693,0.000022505279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008294575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011228551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012711214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009227317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011331076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06694919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W631272203","doi":"","title":"The law of civil procedure in Ontario","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LexisNexis Canada eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Civil procedure; Commercial law","score_opus":0.01677178108273663,"score_gpt":0.23597718076453683,"score_spread":0.2192053996818002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W631272203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007652091,0.00781379,0.00087525736,0.017226476,0.00037004414,0.000072122435,0.0005342667,0.000046338526,0.9654097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13738,0.00820568,0.0011694314,0.0021478245,0.00018506621,0.000080397185,0.000212175,0.00007474606,0.85054475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973573,0.00023322807,0.00007815291,0.00017122568,0.0012503244,0.0009098017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856,0.00029508973,0.000079323305,0.00008795065,0.0006901729,0.00028752527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010421928,0.00052352785,0.00038429245,0.0013905162,0.015206575,0.007256465,0.001317562,0.003278223,0.019183071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033489796,0.00087880663,0.00038648394,0.0036325473,0.0094279805,0.0021174306,0.0018485341,0.0035182573,0.0017709386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108255945,0.000010668874,0.00072125735,0.000063772066,0.0000043245896,0.00010497546,0.004111133,0.00034913915,0.00009389661,0.87464714,0.107016414,0.012866432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010649869,0.00000818538,0.0043702433,0.00019654771,0.000011622914,0.00004822276,0.002697721,0.00036926943,0.00008932618,0.055524945,0.9366414,0.000031962027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99369943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1496347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1496347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22845769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W633328610","doi":"","title":"Die fiducie von Québec und der trust : ein Vergleich mit verschiedenen Modellen fiduziarischer Rechtsfiguren im civil law","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Commercial law","score_opus":0.03822276679091881,"score_gpt":0.31234506665515666,"score_spread":0.27412229986423786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W633328610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08933369,0.014669576,0.012091781,0.022234019,0.00029603404,0.000101510996,0.0011662982,0.00009804997,0.86000896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93525326,0.0043008537,0.002741475,0.00068282435,0.000033605305,0.000060678765,0.00018600721,0.00004331928,0.056697983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978219,0.000723182,0.000038482554,0.00014501726,0.00074513524,0.00052625884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975611,0.0010140412,0.00016541441,0.00017286975,0.00088273326,0.00020386954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020721378,0.0004957899,0.00046993326,0.0024269845,0.0063369754,0.010565532,0.0017001267,0.0026599765,0.015974982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007600584,0.00036583512,0.0005198068,0.0055636163,0.007980128,0.004008701,0.001557324,0.0020687399,0.00050054264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026926407,0.000011777128,0.0012098681,0.000052502648,0.000016319455,0.000052949512,0.0018535075,0.0042413697,0.00003661827,0.9645037,0.012346869,0.015647497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009342426,0.000095764066,0.021900535,0.00097111176,0.00020195235,0.00026231285,0.018551856,0.035682492,0.00046310265,0.5210244,0.4005761,0.0001769123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9655387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97609216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08093772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08093772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04991457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.587247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W641196625","doi":"","title":"Exploring contract law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Estoppel; Doctrine; Damages; Mistake; Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Restitution","score_opus":0.18648716007213711,"score_gpt":0.3375740673275916,"score_spread":0.15108690725545448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W641196625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008893738,0.011467189,0.0070321555,0.019091273,0.00074649235,0.00002475995,0.00004922104,0.000029981094,0.9606696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22118294,0.025408534,0.0076215807,0.020771198,0.0016041953,0.00034257185,0.0001574329,0.00016110546,0.7227505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980678,0.00088156556,0.00003491579,0.00019478271,0.00063091057,0.00019003339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992723,0.00041990718,0.000040822277,0.000076697266,0.00012410858,0.0000660963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020174475,0.0006272221,0.00030165623,0.0010681368,0.004814123,0.007464719,0.0011431142,0.00305197,0.019309504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034582512,0.00028598463,0.00035337458,0.0014703786,0.014432265,0.0078772325,0.0030976715,0.005425291,0.0034566678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.2501547e-7,0.0000011596547,0.0000073683573,0.0000055913274,3.100369e-7,0.000008364465,0.00031816465,0.000029936084,0.000005218061,0.98544216,0.012417834,0.0017631073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025340235,0.0000030915787,0.00005122382,0.00015973249,9.209452e-7,0.000054040225,0.00087589346,0.00020893439,0.00002700122,0.5625435,0.4360701,0.0000031366217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010602734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010551744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019309504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007973185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065839374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06459665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67047942","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1380","title":"The Vulnerability of Indigenous Land Rights in Australia and Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Indigenous rights; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Extinguishment; Politics; High Court; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.020673356737914074,"score_gpt":0.29959797818505224,"score_spread":0.27892462144713814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67047942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4491722,0.007734162,0.00087194634,0.05856152,0.00017639327,0.00007311203,0.00011576275,0.000030683586,0.48326418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775029,0.0023256484,0.00032288383,0.0031859255,0.000028765506,0.000019216659,0.000017346307,0.000009573167,0.016587691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926891,0.00075526955,0.000117126176,0.0004460474,0.0025704242,0.0034220258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952369,0.0011897833,0.00035818527,0.00017498225,0.0015785566,0.0014615966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022829867,0.00021362382,0.00041662334,0.0027762544,0.03057125,0.008897829,0.0016899566,0.0030767662,0.0039737606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089093875,0.00032158705,0.0003565389,0.0028873547,0.021360572,0.0030982888,0.006642198,0.0047769765,0.000119825505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003654027,0.000039551865,0.013398395,0.000111394096,0.00004498235,0.0022613597,0.10008203,0.0008606128,0.0005766648,0.83852303,0.014008315,0.030057061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040394327,0.00007091217,0.11717237,0.0009158485,0.0001621531,0.0014973294,0.19890805,0.0033177126,0.0007285121,0.22599891,0.45085233,0.00033552825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11053199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11053199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13337867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8019695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6885996242","doi":"10.14288/1.0370597","title":"A Bill to Amend the Law relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency in Vancouver Island and its Dependencies. Whereas, doubts have been entertained as to the application of the English Bankruptcy and Insolvent Laws to this Colony. And whereas it is expedient to amend the Laws relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency, and to declare the same Laws so amended to be applicable to this Colony...","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Common law; English law","score_opus":0.026849894716966152,"score_gpt":0.30631684202093307,"score_spread":0.27946694730396693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6885996242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012618185,0.0035419418,0.0020365757,0.14279775,0.0075872964,0.0008406994,0.004532801,0.000632234,0.8254125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030613134,0.0007617635,0.0024231754,0.050245836,0.00040514694,0.00024056561,0.0011591536,0.00014957316,0.9140017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961469,0.00032419496,0.00024484616,0.00024114075,0.0020220932,0.0010208541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930046,0.0015055331,0.0003413904,0.00045505937,0.0037054184,0.0009880315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027181623,0.00057881343,0.0005160096,0.0011253265,0.012311624,0.0055400697,0.0017601121,0.012145476,0.026467051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008284261,0.0012271567,0.0006313397,0.0011459973,0.002921553,0.0015036287,0.0016994042,0.0096864225,0.010225213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029416124,0.00007695776,0.0012651404,0.000048041507,0.000008174438,0.00027250973,0.0011954143,0.0001256032,0.0005686008,0.072983645,0.91072404,0.012702477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034443896,0.000018324934,0.007707316,0.00011336817,0.000012815346,0.00006623311,0.00072417414,0.00013990518,0.00028711857,0.002691843,0.98814195,0.0000623765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8426189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93767965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15738112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013275749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05601299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31661588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886052780","doi":"10.14288/1.0357701","title":"Minutes of meeting of the Board Trustees of the Winfield &amp; Okanagan Centre Irrigation District, March 18, 1932","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irrigation; On board; Annual report","score_opus":0.04929864801979789,"score_gpt":0.32580887682566106,"score_spread":0.2765102288058632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886052780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010572554,0.006495002,0.0011724667,0.04237358,0.021534862,0.0011886673,0.010563494,0.00044654167,0.9056529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057112523,0.0007430979,0.00023638752,0.0006140379,0.0005878904,0.000107823915,0.00060876604,0.00009144458,0.9912992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934477,0.0000784218,0.000027745371,0.00009450322,0.00022722351,0.0002273061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987772,0.00007913751,0.000060380127,0.000029694658,0.000560952,0.00049264735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090139953,0.00083348475,0.00036385967,0.0006216668,0.0054899044,0.0022113295,0.0006962814,0.0017081122,0.27346474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025459235,0.00056426285,0.00025536455,0.00056435214,0.0006049743,0.0012285501,0.0019260626,0.00197154,0.106142305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057539488,0.000008835148,0.00025373718,0.000021720653,9.3832006e-7,0.00007492385,0.00023033954,0.00002819342,0.0003027193,0.00032049272,0.9920879,0.006612729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045888582,0.000007577077,0.0018616791,0.000014153617,6.842117e-7,0.000016142048,0.0004941332,0.0000126408795,0.00005023433,0.000043910237,0.9974897,0.0000045314705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10157254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32814255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032449856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003873766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9148307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886066233","doi":"10.14288/1.0370694","title":"A Bill to Amend the Law Relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency in Vancouver Island and its Dependencies. Whereas, doubts have been entertained as to the application of the English Bankrupt and Insolvent Laws to this Colony. And whereas it is expedient to amend the Laws relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency, and to declare the same Laws so amended to be applicable to this Colony.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Legislation; English law","score_opus":0.026638186143584847,"score_gpt":0.3060024910932688,"score_spread":0.279364304949684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886066233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016971864,0.0034647866,0.002519543,0.1024127,0.0056842305,0.00089994207,0.0040667397,0.0005203597,0.8634598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040034827,0.000955721,0.0038187157,0.035392676,0.0003830367,0.0002794614,0.0013916099,0.00013299637,0.9176109],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961909,0.00033362498,0.00026008722,0.00026141558,0.0020850368,0.0008690119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936697,0.0015310653,0.00033752088,0.00050047744,0.0030459324,0.0009153741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029031856,0.0005680031,0.0004880285,0.0011858682,0.0104192225,0.005506451,0.0017660075,0.010924825,0.022193331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009130615,0.0010800363,0.00059564685,0.0011866507,0.0033546172,0.0014633602,0.0017678788,0.009888012,0.0067076683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000384803,0.00009676022,0.0017495415,0.00006366074,0.000010694737,0.00042702546,0.0014025313,0.0001804632,0.0008013634,0.12855749,0.85011154,0.016560461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003210028,0.000021513633,0.008012893,0.00013738511,0.000013778314,0.00008865234,0.0007383128,0.00017132342,0.00034912114,0.0036532371,0.9867191,0.0000625903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82521576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92808443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17478424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014585722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055012003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3516271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904004996","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.22061.49129","title":"Costs in Family Law Proceedings in Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.033615073373160324,"score_gpt":0.29358726984127603,"score_spread":0.2599721964681157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904004996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72366387,0.0053052865,0.00090288906,0.050855614,0.00020579432,0.00026296303,0.0013036504,0.0000346522,0.21746525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97516,0.0012299814,0.00029335322,0.0010088448,0.0000617851,0.000062497835,0.000110359164,0.000014026821,0.022059198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98789257,0.0023471452,0.0006351353,0.0005311232,0.0039036835,0.0046902895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95845556,0.016444659,0.005157704,0.0006833971,0.009826688,0.009432063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00502933,0.00020375582,0.00058753823,0.0034431575,0.01761145,0.008375612,0.0021303026,0.0030522891,0.012655299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043350924,0.00081514654,0.0005432894,0.0056981132,0.005503829,0.0023968427,0.0034475895,0.0027698867,0.0003075589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053107063,0.00033070415,0.29337156,0.0005267685,0.00019584951,0.0024671033,0.05102942,0.0060158884,0.00033212942,0.4856651,0.08430211,0.07523218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002480506,0.00017470325,0.7023699,0.0010824811,0.0003146577,0.000873049,0.07761715,0.0054887743,0.00042721556,0.060501903,0.15065973,0.00024229758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99588937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20045036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20045036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22281377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92736423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904868849","doi":"10.14288/1.0354634","title":"Letter from The Westminster Trust and Safe Deposit Company to [James] Goldie, September 1909","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.03947823413792121,"score_gpt":0.32668086067759394,"score_spread":0.2872026265396727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904868849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007898039,0.01905154,0.00042312045,0.3386987,0.023710284,0.000116648116,0.0012609337,0.00017878684,0.60866195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014291749,0.0030975293,0.00015191217,0.036970865,0.0018370379,0.000022538014,0.00016119693,0.00007081915,0.9433964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988986,0.00010880852,0.00007394694,0.00018454579,0.00033911326,0.0003949552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989813,0.0002091309,0.000068576315,0.000037949318,0.00047182836,0.00023123415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009528392,0.0005508812,0.00038720656,0.00061762903,0.0089074895,0.004042888,0.0006202293,0.006512773,0.063214846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006843713,0.0005608944,0.00026591725,0.00059384736,0.0014027401,0.002351505,0.0014833439,0.0065732733,0.021450583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025918469,0.0000053576964,0.00027824164,0.000017386572,0.0000019720428,0.00029661722,0.00054699444,0.0000065266026,0.00010320855,0.006657154,0.9881648,0.0038959172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035955497,0.0000073711262,0.0008166213,0.000047876652,0.000002485264,0.00013664516,0.00045232216,0.000007870611,0.000103296574,0.0003867142,0.99802667,0.00000847956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16477104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31908414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16477104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060012653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005342534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3276239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6905002092","doi":"10.14288/1.0222176","title":"In the Supreme Court of Canada, On appeal from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia between Attorney-General of Canada and City of Vancouver (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and Alfred Gonzalves (Defendant) Respondent. Case on Appeal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; High Court; Remand (court procedure); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.020539383637839567,"score_gpt":0.2172447651374114,"score_spread":0.19670538149957184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6905002092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05065026,0.008977755,0.0022581604,0.30850008,0.00966455,0.00094722136,0.010032402,0.0004091067,0.60856044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15042606,0.0027609272,0.0017107334,0.1867985,0.0011303182,0.00031609973,0.0018152107,0.00013027046,0.6549119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940918,0.0002252375,0.00017106754,0.00046973486,0.002335728,0.0027063566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968759,0.0006981474,0.000057460875,0.00007038112,0.0015929656,0.00070506247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020810626,0.0008888033,0.0010427773,0.001758124,0.0332868,0.011591526,0.0038026331,0.02493732,0.014274881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010058482,0.0013996216,0.0014268006,0.0023739235,0.0033614011,0.0015920503,0.0018877472,0.01652903,0.002874818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096307835,0.00008831284,0.004248379,0.00009540812,0.0000654489,0.0014738162,0.0025880432,0.000499679,0.00089763984,0.12794411,0.8528189,0.009183937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012814156,0.000041085365,0.021685896,0.0003235975,0.00022912277,0.0002623338,0.007112024,0.0014979587,0.0010080816,0.014083829,0.9533578,0.00027004597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98815304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05893044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05893044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13679641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4275723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6921961628","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1714.2000.tb00271.x/pdf","title":"At the interface of law and accounting: An examination of a trend toward a reduction in the scope of auditor liability to third parties in the common law countries","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Archive @ University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Common law; Audit; Scope (computer science); Statute; Strict liability","score_opus":0.020387658877029223,"score_gpt":0.2450095401032653,"score_spread":0.22462188122623608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6921961628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496474,0.002928145,0.000761483,0.016128521,0.00003263485,0.000018232897,0.000045230903,0.000009717433,0.030428618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976815,0.000699979,0.00017466854,0.0010234043,0.000020608,0.000006072259,0.000012116078,0.0000043195646,0.00037720276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899393,0.005039244,0.00064156984,0.0006380966,0.0023091051,0.0014326135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94850636,0.02529886,0.017740415,0.0012163547,0.005623552,0.0016144137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009400002,0.000107806474,0.00035408477,0.0091767125,0.0047351895,0.008161894,0.00092793914,0.0019231298,0.0025769987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038855564,0.00037545987,0.0003639856,0.016129503,0.016944269,0.009882981,0.007280704,0.0028725595,0.00017399747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018506772,0.00019379964,0.37372398,0.00041904836,0.00006656531,0.0012809136,0.37166214,0.0006706894,0.0017461757,0.14018749,0.0046337103,0.10523043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010858465,0.0001070599,0.74933285,0.0004802276,0.000031273616,0.00040081108,0.21347633,0.00039872035,0.00038457467,0.008839556,0.026499355,0.00003840291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03211136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0463069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03211136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006542878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065475167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06384885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6944074724","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/urj6n","title":"The presumption of resulting trust and beneficiary designations: What’s intention go to do with it?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Beneficiary; Doctrine; Estate; Settlor; Empirical evidence","score_opus":0.06899826628608988,"score_gpt":0.41350786885176916,"score_spread":0.3445096025656793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6944074724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16234544,0.012184659,0.036966495,0.32625568,0.00092953787,0.00015899257,0.0003547893,0.00012837896,0.4606761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654254,0.0030948203,0.003819265,0.0141648995,0.00017448247,0.000034917262,0.0000742794,0.00004090437,0.013171111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859372,0.0022903148,0.00060651347,0.00091792876,0.0061707837,0.0040773014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781327,0.010179601,0.002193675,0.0017677495,0.0064147497,0.0013115368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01487871,0.0004261254,0.0006679415,0.0016627216,0.011188662,0.01404236,0.0038265882,0.0073324484,0.004082554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039017655,0.00047066712,0.0012176259,0.0022241517,0.0383603,0.011602654,0.0036148643,0.011031571,0.000681311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012670217,0.000012297366,0.0030903784,0.000045164663,0.000010673729,0.00021484132,0.0060820407,0.00013172887,0.0001067237,0.97874314,0.0033164283,0.00823397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006427355,0.00006624182,0.021844015,0.0015726356,0.0001728668,0.00081083295,0.04279365,0.0019795194,0.0019150375,0.74798644,0.18052968,0.00026493214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7045749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76259625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7045749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03783643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06906539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59432983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968710746","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4606807","title":"i need the most strongest love spell, revenge/ death , cure to sickness and infertility, caster win court case etc +2348164900707","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Curse; MAGIC (telescope); Seclusion","score_opus":0.058349937068350184,"score_gpt":0.3089403079859198,"score_spread":0.25059037091756964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968710746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016797155,0.0026558412,0.00031305233,0.15202117,0.0076011056,0.00013706954,0.00036145505,0.00024080668,0.83498985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00690844,0.0009645689,0.00016852094,0.029219802,0.001564036,0.000043755866,0.00007235661,0.000083446444,0.960975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940026,0.00008174964,0.000025043877,0.00007833421,0.00015317916,0.00026141678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985671,0.00018803492,0.00005718439,0.000051576924,0.00028268358,0.0008533416],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000508942,0.00042188968,0.00039718242,0.0005995024,0.0058734296,0.0025587962,0.00080022163,0.0054761237,0.5023665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003600076,0.00034617886,0.0003753597,0.00033107089,0.0008945684,0.0017958072,0.0024408277,0.00575572,0.13348675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086552345,0.000022400203,0.00021626739,0.000016207221,7.132721e-7,0.00045320633,0.000092627284,0.000011680193,0.000060612605,0.0018351513,0.9839553,0.013327007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130210165,0.000028074212,0.001281626,0.00011115687,0.000002225616,0.0010734183,0.0007827145,0.000035409987,0.00004276379,0.00096340786,0.9956564,0.000009783217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010878294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043086033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49763352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015043132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017054352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70981383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980107130","doi":"","title":"The Authorship of Certain Papers in <italic>The Lower Canada Jurist</italic>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Subject (documents); Exposition (narrative)","score_opus":0.023857529487475722,"score_gpt":0.2622308530890648,"score_spread":0.23837332360158908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980107130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011017674,0.007076013,0.002737217,0.09452774,0.09864106,0.0001606029,0.0042207474,0.00033016442,0.7812888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16530254,0.006783315,0.0029267445,0.0121197915,0.02647834,0.00015016526,0.00251551,0.0008630724,0.7828605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929852,0.0006469286,0.0004262619,0.00067569804,0.004001554,0.0012643407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616466,0.010782405,0.003152211,0.0030957286,0.018127916,0.0031951342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003260047,0.0004912447,0.0005286867,0.008516858,0.009632018,0.010808722,0.0017715794,0.0030463024,0.04932454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03445661,0.0003566055,0.00043920585,0.012780263,0.004347048,0.0021144766,0.0018814792,0.0035652248,0.010721944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035794397,0.0000102450995,0.00057587214,0.0002252375,0.000015368252,0.00014922215,0.001896011,0.000049622096,0.00044485397,0.12842296,0.851505,0.016669804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049835417,0.0000028922432,0.0014053616,0.00012288026,0.000005046019,0.000053049098,0.00059383846,0.0000617912,0.00049316086,0.002952292,0.9942924,0.000012332149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2064845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3676861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7935155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02391381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023604909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41056526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980405334","doi":"","title":"Canada's Legal Inheritances","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Order (exchange); Payment","score_opus":0.018628872908477673,"score_gpt":0.2766016047200417,"score_spread":0.257972731811564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980405334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035957217,0.006865449,0.00057361874,0.02363416,0.000619674,0.00006549492,0.0060803248,0.0003222737,0.95824313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04036486,0.0037167289,0.0007893689,0.0039437045,0.000118022814,0.000026699,0.0011678878,0.00013164237,0.9497412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758744,0.000067120876,0.000032484015,0.00013301434,0.0015457411,0.0006342601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981223,0.00012409066,0.000033534896,0.00009009648,0.0011939097,0.0004360327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084867736,0.00049769523,0.00038537945,0.0023250598,0.012164461,0.00666535,0.0014035052,0.0025607904,0.08458806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030521252,0.0005397198,0.0004673871,0.003182523,0.0022740262,0.001236806,0.0015326213,0.0029906384,0.00929134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009687528,0.0000106008165,0.00075995,0.000050004677,0.0000042322886,0.000115369374,0.0004454395,0.00012593398,0.00007596996,0.14563036,0.8273869,0.025385533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036963108,0.0000018158075,0.0015673116,0.000060541726,0.0000035303153,0.00003066251,0.00018496992,0.00007382667,0.000046021276,0.0021055473,0.99591297,0.0000089210525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99124384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08458806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064695716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14519343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4694025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980825359","doi":"","title":"Criterios MEDLINE para la selección de revistas cientÃficas. MetodologÃa e indicadores: Aplicación a las revistas médicas españolas con especial atención a las de salud pública","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Electronic library online (Sciences Carlos III Health Institute)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; China; Web of science","score_opus":0.037114230445837,"score_gpt":0.3642187530367662,"score_spread":0.3271045225909292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980825359","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061006984,0.5660806,0.030446116,0.0684697,0.025639318,0.054734286,0.13291341,0.0025706575,0.11304518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0380292,0.40063226,0.27197796,0.024837505,0.010099868,0.1426774,0.07056984,0.0012329641,0.039942935],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.84253067,0.041915257,0.086668335,0.0032262509,0.024227409,0.0014320948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5951023,0.21986045,0.065725885,0.012961736,0.09891635,0.0074333316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06908523,0.0026596906,0.0060264627,0.069332086,0.0032580285,0.0139137525,0.0045038755,0.0042056795,0.04496796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3112458,0.0019067161,0.0044972887,0.05306064,0.0034265039,0.010648833,0.006705794,0.0048953304,0.018349182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089554634,0.00012237387,0.0032893694,0.4506523,0.0011734169,0.00079976476,0.00336297,0.0003653029,0.00274676,0.013623046,0.27818152,0.24478768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002847461,0.00028705958,0.008222207,0.14824818,0.0015189934,0.0010045564,0.0019897106,0.00026347593,0.0013751633,0.0100964885,0.8265236,0.00018573082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004623622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008220839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93091476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008402117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054186072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.365362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981241806","doi":"","title":"Drought, Heavy Precipitation and Climate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precipitation; Storm; Atmospheric research; Winter storm; Climate change; Research program","score_opus":0.007270854689161005,"score_gpt":0.2245598091914986,"score_spread":0.2172889545023376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981241806","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09461498,0.5949298,0.0032669299,0.09199104,0.011876613,0.00009012208,0.0018076006,0.00013312843,0.20128977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59334105,0.3249417,0.0021259983,0.020510387,0.0155661395,0.00012837877,0.0010554623,0.00003446507,0.042296566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962926,0.00012565497,0.000020805972,0.00007180227,0.000081142025,0.00007120532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995584,0.00012520398,0.00014417157,0.000013585624,0.000056836343,0.00010182098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004791675,0.00027076298,0.00025961132,0.0006310431,0.00071878324,0.0016259057,0.00020816177,0.0008159326,0.004890652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001406578,0.000083285224,0.00013180939,0.0011141017,0.0016452874,0.0011509291,0.0010834344,0.0010865016,0.0004953437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003104436,0.0001409822,0.055502087,0.0019062997,0.00013445907,0.0010792675,0.005541621,0.0024189008,0.0012586152,0.28748873,0.2658293,0.37838936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019787945,0.00012972494,0.11064108,0.0008431478,0.00004261331,0.0010526406,0.0034054155,0.0004195379,0.00011839141,0.11221052,0.771064,0.00005323403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065683336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00650333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065683336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089004356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010647178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016360879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982017872","doi":"","title":"Gender Stereotypes & Rape Myths: Investigating the Impact of Psychological Androgyny","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Androgyny; Mythology; Sample (material); Peer pressure; Gender role; Gender identity; Masculinity","score_opus":0.2589849062361362,"score_gpt":0.43052761261963435,"score_spread":0.17154270638349817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982017872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99868685,0.00018735592,0.00003259685,0.000084640305,0.0000052237833,0.000009839477,0.000020853944,5.0568036e-7,0.0009720416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905163,0.0002758196,0.000093655224,0.00006227168,0.00001041094,0.000017725219,0.00003213374,0.000001398155,0.00045512142],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986241,0.0005479885,0.00007615758,0.00012659715,0.00039767602,0.00022739447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99115926,0.002673037,0.0041968,0.00043417097,0.0005669282,0.0009698226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024607866,0.0003214847,0.0004070241,0.0014502337,0.0015420428,0.0019319657,0.000513041,0.000630925,0.0029600367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010746335,0.0003182716,0.0004434959,0.0009284888,0.0016225065,0.0011177538,0.0015817402,0.0013873284,0.00027131962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007248787,0.00032755907,0.9713253,0.00005097936,0.000039044833,0.00015036947,0.019296227,0.000013090897,0.00045944873,0.00031343158,0.00008824351,0.0078638075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003124431,0.000114270864,0.9807535,0.000039662536,0.00001458811,0.0001626879,0.018229725,0.00004463144,0.00011047104,0.00014334514,0.00037870771,0.000005338295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009425029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018987754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009425029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083122717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013876277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018740356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982090603","doi":"","title":"A goal programming algorithm to incorporate the Columbia river non-power flow requirements in the Columbia River treaty model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Downstream (manufacturing); Flood myth; Flow (mathematics); Recreation; Weir; Pipeline (software); Plan (archaeology)","score_opus":0.01736291933256347,"score_gpt":0.23276372093139824,"score_spread":0.21540080159883476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982090603","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014902481,0.00010213988,0.9729783,0.0003632598,0.000039013677,0.00020274235,0.00025307268,0.00050437765,0.010654662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19397517,0.00015384963,0.7991532,0.00019752138,0.000021544716,0.00073786045,0.00055874325,0.00012449834,0.0050776335],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994659,0.00023072807,0.000024336587,0.00011125458,0.00008875776,0.00007903801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991497,0.0005715193,0.000060175193,0.000023347091,0.0001585759,0.000036821315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017536518,0.0010749814,0.0008407483,0.0006397658,0.00073322444,0.0017241949,0.0015115495,0.0014100189,0.0038273367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002323598,0.00077940355,0.00091729074,0.0009200094,0.00058538845,0.0010442457,0.001309746,0.0019018811,0.000570019],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017198488,0.000038669492,0.0002311644,0.000032508175,0.000012579192,0.00004002485,0.00003372388,0.9797402,0.00012828181,0.007206878,0.0010194264,0.01149924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011745767,0.000012217416,0.000030398724,0.0000068105037,0.000004378215,0.0000047381304,0.000012135619,0.99677306,0.00006109943,0.0024567624,0.00062358874,0.0000030277279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03842904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041292783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03842904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017263761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004446433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07641071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982803324","doi":"","title":"Kyko Global Inc v. Omkar Bhongir","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Factoring; Pleading; Accounts receivable; Corporation; Probate; Statute; Damages; State (computer science); Subpoena","score_opus":0.02720074787563187,"score_gpt":0.29948545035978463,"score_spread":0.27228470248415276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982803324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041355934,0.0028830385,0.00067175203,0.025740424,0.00078305724,0.00018240645,0.0010275091,0.00015367402,0.92720234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3070407,0.002033707,0.00059040025,0.09379796,0.00029090783,0.0002853606,0.00071128947,0.00009374196,0.595156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981602,0.00013791997,0.000057945024,0.00025065563,0.0005704366,0.00082283205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991025,0.00028412524,0.00008143431,0.00006469788,0.00027609363,0.00019124047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009987259,0.0005184861,0.00020161916,0.00069906097,0.008503605,0.0052325213,0.0009930714,0.0084135905,0.020630216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00232527,0.00065639976,0.00035552774,0.00077452586,0.0018315092,0.0017839329,0.0028748945,0.0068053687,0.0048164492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025564816,0.000081768536,0.008680122,0.00030875343,0.000036665566,0.0056532724,0.0054411804,0.00035653278,0.0059757116,0.3961712,0.55299306,0.024046132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006289717,0.00006834857,0.012012175,0.00029298995,0.000044239638,0.001493327,0.0020407927,0.00028448986,0.0023955384,0.0089220395,0.97230047,0.00008274398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14802821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.252568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14802821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055781608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104469005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29433316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982846158","doi":"","title":"Kerr v. Danier Leather: an Analysis of the Difficulty to Enforce a Duty to Update Statements about the Future in the Context of Securities Regulation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Context (archaeology); Liability; Production (economics); Duty of care","score_opus":0.004731537590796633,"score_gpt":0.2270997123817503,"score_spread":0.22236817479095367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982846158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16402005,0.004012542,0.004992851,0.1307122,0.00027866865,0.0003072737,0.0003199065,0.000046016936,0.6953105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9029273,0.0022306524,0.0016709515,0.020032033,0.00016400823,0.00010836282,0.00005097244,0.000034860273,0.07278092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892033,0.0018388729,0.0004945735,0.0011052616,0.0049087517,0.0024492808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97201467,0.020198926,0.0020453085,0.0008280628,0.0037607716,0.0011523319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010088315,0.00028875287,0.00051233626,0.0017492331,0.012921932,0.009383251,0.0026009725,0.0103641795,0.0047277026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034944847,0.0006014176,0.0007708432,0.0022942796,0.017455198,0.0044505764,0.0029082696,0.011002322,0.00051403267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029861789,0.00003239751,0.0034841076,0.000033095563,0.000012664226,0.0006320098,0.009894805,0.0006722896,0.00028886856,0.9611563,0.018680448,0.0050831847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002095193,0.00014866456,0.0520296,0.0011141233,0.00033189444,0.0011078061,0.035279587,0.009946467,0.0032953105,0.46910107,0.4270519,0.00038413357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7279252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75444835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7279252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0463446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053113285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5473542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983001368","doi":"","title":"The Law of Restitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Tort; Wrongdoing; Unconscionability; Mistake; Equity (law); Constructive trust; Duty; Subrogation","score_opus":0.03271867622410677,"score_gpt":0.29950352551476844,"score_spread":0.26678484929066165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983001368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016007798,0.037300874,0.0032047383,0.014513536,0.0015278419,0.00007482129,0.00028764328,0.000071210154,0.9414186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15525484,0.03224559,0.0023382495,0.011349213,0.0017594631,0.0001831489,0.00046265055,0.00014161684,0.79626524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717134,0.00040379676,0.00010488124,0.0003525831,0.0012429497,0.0007245233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898094,0.0002154276,0.00006640521,0.000118433614,0.00052694447,0.00009171902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011699927,0.0008639848,0.0004673913,0.0014253998,0.0062267664,0.00562531,0.0022084413,0.0031957289,0.018149737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028625724,0.00043832586,0.00061113114,0.0020317044,0.019306727,0.0036689446,0.0021092913,0.0049899514,0.004591555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042145402,0.0000065080776,0.000071737195,0.00004595057,0.0000015338842,0.000050874434,0.0006130875,0.00010232148,0.000037609923,0.94684637,0.045217928,0.0070017497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003450297,0.000010057876,0.00042318538,0.00018550103,0.000004047679,0.00006925145,0.00036209135,0.00011426818,0.00009972228,0.10876491,0.88995045,0.000013030267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5626303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45234013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5626303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03260551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023977699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8798909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983593458","doi":"","title":"NARROWING THE ATLANTIC: A STUDY OF THE USE OF ENGLISH PRECEDENTS IN CANADIAN CORPORATE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Realm; Common law; English law; Extraterritoriality","score_opus":0.29942875130509067,"score_gpt":0.33064183311973827,"score_spread":0.031213081814647603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983593458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579573,0.0005701426,0.00013913796,0.0025693255,0.000026082036,0.000044625765,0.00010829691,0.0000054010393,0.03857961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935069,0.0007012143,0.00023474547,0.00060439087,0.0000080276395,0.00002048247,0.00007102047,0.0000130281815,0.0048401114],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364036,0.0011406289,0.00016092022,0.00058358774,0.0024984982,0.001975932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857998,0.0057654874,0.0016838525,0.00036150706,0.004328855,0.002060552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005240924,0.00036414198,0.0005462044,0.004563453,0.0356028,0.008773848,0.0026187457,0.0020498235,0.004498747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023698963,0.00074297574,0.00026705957,0.0094846785,0.013096109,0.0039574914,0.0038856522,0.0036252455,0.000282097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041550025,0.000095413474,0.032994818,0.00006431694,0.000008775423,0.00033271767,0.93673384,0.00006328303,0.0004296093,0.014499161,0.002467941,0.012268585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006038332,0.000033428336,0.099283464,0.00015069594,0.000016373708,0.00012360165,0.86865014,0.000236543,0.00013514831,0.0006255807,0.030670606,0.00006838083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99420655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88279474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11720523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11146773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85038745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6985852197","doi":"","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Asset (computer security); Duty; Investment (military); Duty of care","score_opus":0.027505580476461133,"score_gpt":0.33515723485255033,"score_spread":0.3076516543760892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6985852197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008278775,0.004103598,0.0039692307,0.007819118,0.007981919,0.00018485052,0.0033866293,0.0010843028,0.9706425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042739944,0.003352423,0.002277675,0.0034827683,0.0016050232,0.00010992139,0.003150621,0.00042641273,0.98132116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867636,0.0001446989,0.00007145389,0.00031902216,0.0006387115,0.00014980014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860245,0.00022967752,0.00006869258,0.00017936534,0.0006989565,0.00022089241],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072971784,0.0009360951,0.00079701206,0.001566586,0.00201847,0.0068114367,0.0018537827,0.0027607568,0.47513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035480624,0.00041177016,0.000772008,0.0017025474,0.0010357146,0.004344324,0.0030074997,0.0027920578,0.34383324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028882649,0.00003865202,0.00025540398,0.00017850369,0.0000039053093,0.00009511956,0.00032940714,0.00014269077,0.00027105285,0.037749972,0.868425,0.092481405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017939971,0.000007043497,0.00014120915,0.00007354121,9.0698074e-7,0.000059886224,0.000082018625,0.000026732252,0.00003772016,0.0023701778,0.99719584,0.0000031025497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034869004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004483323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52487004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00213338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024739255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74866337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986164147","doi":"","title":"The Ontario insolvency case. : in the Privy Council, Council Chamber, Whitehall, December 12th, 1893 : the attorney-general of Ontario vs. the attorney-general of Canada : argument of Mr. Blake of the appellant.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Insolvency; Commission; Government (linguistics); Bankruptcy","score_opus":0.01735578991707854,"score_gpt":0.18958160168944602,"score_spread":0.17222581177236748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986164147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061987605,0.028056419,0.00046625506,0.34706897,0.0022287387,0.000120091696,0.0017749798,0.000046525696,0.5582504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39704296,0.006719288,0.00037253893,0.09278144,0.0008851449,0.00012035003,0.00040971802,0.00008395739,0.5015846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603987,0.00025902406,0.000088426525,0.00023014053,0.0016774255,0.0017050438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976851,0.00047319935,0.00020703465,0.00006336901,0.0009819235,0.0005893208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015758729,0.00045294018,0.00031045094,0.0007790965,0.032372583,0.0050068153,0.0021051974,0.012467018,0.009648368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051944247,0.00084258494,0.0005647821,0.0020943636,0.007916547,0.001684208,0.002617737,0.006023993,0.0016287062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013182632,0.000031748186,0.009761696,0.00013004174,0.000019884186,0.0026065842,0.022170054,0.00017051997,0.00044723917,0.1363687,0.81800014,0.010161634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074446565,0.000021737373,0.04602613,0.00025068416,0.000059437236,0.00046705376,0.012718906,0.00020675972,0.00040115567,0.0059810826,0.9337194,0.000073158015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99779415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07739479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07739479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.079915814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56154114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987137834","doi":"","title":"Shadd, M.A - Toronto, Aug 29, 1854. Agreement between M.A. Shadd","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Howard (Howard University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Limit (mathematics); Process (computing); Work (physics); Measure (data warehouse)","score_opus":0.04409124756424733,"score_gpt":0.2575326685334152,"score_spread":0.2134414209691679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987137834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038899016,0.028167319,0.00061484525,0.020127578,0.0042272527,0.000058553964,0.0048069614,0.0001986072,0.93790907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020375594,0.0032288304,0.00018875721,0.0014867173,0.00026711496,0.000022651695,0.00045485844,0.000055104363,0.9739203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966896,0.000044191172,0.000017165683,0.00006365004,0.0001260284,0.00007994262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999778,0.000028179971,0.000015449305,0.000019034529,0.000118816024,0.000040452887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033940322,0.00065191375,0.00030018276,0.0011745789,0.0077564907,0.0019967991,0.0005991903,0.0018122472,0.1218092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011765967,0.0004144366,0.00022222748,0.0013233016,0.0016165399,0.0013504082,0.0013071427,0.0020653808,0.033148207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004584675,0.0000072396274,0.00057966117,0.00006811663,0.0000043193527,0.00027936976,0.0015052792,0.000059100996,0.00014983621,0.054360606,0.9186223,0.024318425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023771772,0.0000028409063,0.000826754,0.00003053211,0.0000012700037,0.00005684864,0.00021747343,0.000010973427,0.000069113994,0.0010969462,0.99768114,0.000003698462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40812358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.782633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5918764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00856993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042987247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8114961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987262865","doi":"","title":"Snelling, Richard (1834-93)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.021794445234049453,"score_gpt":0.28968967663019013,"score_spread":0.2678952313961407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987262865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013021717,0.046258643,0.00033674287,0.007931304,0.0040413733,0.000045048862,0.0018076182,0.00007783575,0.9381992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010564432,0.008527279,0.0002515671,0.0023442216,0.00048106583,0.000044588396,0.00042511584,0.00007761004,0.9772842],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996346,0.00006122636,0.00002066434,0.00008805562,0.00012307105,0.00007234235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998636,0.000024242681,0.000011548448,0.0000104809615,0.000071006085,0.000018988112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000340691,0.0007073996,0.00035988993,0.001749957,0.00494042,0.0024990137,0.0007245043,0.0021134424,0.103123575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009466107,0.00044445152,0.00025908463,0.002217588,0.0014382402,0.0025608926,0.0014302983,0.0021188548,0.05018407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020797528,0.0000077499835,0.00019571945,0.0000798635,0.0000022568713,0.00029442986,0.0022379889,0.000026319418,0.000056771976,0.05096844,0.8893596,0.056750022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012077307,0.0000019243205,0.00026582307,0.00006476056,6.563432e-7,0.00006564515,0.0002391478,0.0000023953355,0.000011553624,0.00089181756,0.99845326,0.0000017843214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10890012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30685908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10890012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026166032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021814487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34498274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987281178","doi":"","title":"âSoldiers for Sale: German âMercenariesâ with the British in Canada during the American Revolution, 1776-83 (Book Review)â by Jean-Pierre Wilhelmy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Fusible alloy; Durvalumab; Demotion","score_opus":0.006720461804511589,"score_gpt":0.22354863321005913,"score_spread":0.21682817140554755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987281178","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076098684,0.896643,0.000050494633,0.013490757,0.0012920569,0.000013728187,0.00035275,0.000009697143,0.08053774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09648378,0.8223725,0.00013097905,0.006737391,0.0006452939,0.00002377319,0.00031335512,0.00003109382,0.07326187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986278,0.0000937782,0.00004338657,0.00011977544,0.00063522684,0.00048014737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905926,0.00016540157,0.00008478548,0.0000193227,0.0005353403,0.00013589807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012121669,0.0006759713,0.000635454,0.0030446895,0.00825369,0.0064200494,0.0011194017,0.0023277546,0.008030631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023148102,0.00037507925,0.00021879295,0.011711147,0.008044573,0.0024800284,0.0019978476,0.0026847164,0.00093020307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014304504,0.000040942734,0.003687592,0.0032734077,0.00007962893,0.00079123606,0.036597427,0.00024650758,0.00028355647,0.17239851,0.5017328,0.2807253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046888113,0.000005793256,0.00688487,0.0014256514,0.00001845331,0.00012767209,0.0057744994,0.000009139173,0.000059691243,0.0009934364,0.9846795,0.000016556056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9593785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9811755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06022454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06022454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08675853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43696165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987372762","doi":"","title":"Stuck in Neutral? Reforming Corporate Purpose and Fiduciary Duties","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Shareholder; Corporate law; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Legislation; Legislature; Companies Act; Shareholder resolution","score_opus":0.04548493495552139,"score_gpt":0.3030163922048246,"score_spread":0.25753145724930326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987372762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03471547,0.006118925,0.059741367,0.15662637,0.0020269775,0.00011029091,0.00007070644,0.00016971721,0.74042016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8871211,0.0021747558,0.012941387,0.036876954,0.0009828411,0.00021800467,0.000051412142,0.0001405194,0.059492946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836826,0.0069375215,0.0005024685,0.00233986,0.00412065,0.0024168554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99257493,0.0032722594,0.00044613332,0.001212967,0.0017008488,0.0007929243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018316593,0.0005799173,0.0007441392,0.001490551,0.008928549,0.014245615,0.0027878112,0.010728516,0.0036160666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02165901,0.00054126716,0.00068359845,0.00082774507,0.053606994,0.016345456,0.006775239,0.011485238,0.0012303214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015024282,0.000003509626,0.000048223013,0.000003787254,5.489863e-7,0.000012423127,0.00051843113,0.000037959417,0.00003192357,0.99621,0.0014111471,0.0017205504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012549835,0.00002636756,0.00030310926,0.00017487221,0.000007179462,0.00005931185,0.0013206475,0.00047664501,0.0003124548,0.8941913,0.10308922,0.000026407144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03773598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03663881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03773598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014403352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018915134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10450411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990106468","doi":"","title":"Costs Immunity: Banishing the 'Bane' of Costs from\\nPublic Interest Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Order (exchange); Economic Justice; Cost–benefit analysis; Interest rate; Common law","score_opus":0.031057823481930286,"score_gpt":0.28825669251554636,"score_spread":0.2571988690336161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990106468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07216596,0.00089996145,0.007321539,0.024602618,0.0002478709,0.00020225308,0.00009559436,0.00012252187,0.8943417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391209,0.0006277758,0.0035918544,0.013567621,0.00015570936,0.00008964417,0.00006684637,0.000036745783,0.042742893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832962,0.002157886,0.0005093254,0.00087950344,0.009177931,0.0039792038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897267,0.004573454,0.0009630722,0.0011100782,0.00275546,0.0008711783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004619189,0.00032376288,0.0003444374,0.0014772303,0.005775094,0.010325355,0.002068288,0.0057601235,0.005710703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02624399,0.0003675279,0.00039085976,0.00078484206,0.017630847,0.0043988577,0.0048827636,0.005749824,0.00073246984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020299018,0.000041625583,0.0019751273,0.000037970854,0.0000048612474,0.00021921162,0.0020088577,0.00023174634,0.00043917817,0.964175,0.01232611,0.01852004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022652345,0.00024941165,0.044577315,0.0008807677,0.00018454625,0.0011908595,0.01469544,0.005981648,0.007674043,0.38500744,0.53910726,0.00022472034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3602798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48349482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3602798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01674734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0569829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71636546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991415300","doi":"","title":"Ginger Gardner, individually, and as guardian of her minor child, Abrina Lynn Gardner; Heather Ann Gardner; and Joshua Lee Gardner v. SPX Corporation; HOJ Engineering and Sales Co., Inc., d/b/a Dock and Door Services, a Utah corporation; and Schneider Canada, Inc., a Canadian Corporation : Reply Brief","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Guardian; Appeal; DOCK; FAUST","score_opus":0.007600212786050294,"score_gpt":0.22874631646835678,"score_spread":0.22114610368230647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991415300","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002545441,0.015087836,0.0004641941,0.9290057,0.008771636,0.000024887084,0.00013998659,0.000044046967,0.043916292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037490852,0.012286779,0.0005979589,0.68208975,0.0035965922,0.00007113873,0.00008009243,0.00011442935,0.26367238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999059,0.00022204759,0.000061084815,0.00019574507,0.00025627372,0.00020574348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973345,0.001426816,0.00011267057,0.000070355636,0.00048037234,0.000575384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015375649,0.0006212963,0.0005143253,0.00039082847,0.0072989874,0.0023747515,0.0013853321,0.01225291,0.01542209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009038725,0.0005542138,0.00034371146,0.0004857701,0.0016431717,0.0022187647,0.001022985,0.012708641,0.0056909043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012840522,0.000012355654,0.0009772547,0.000041619485,0.000003638609,0.00049943785,0.001055407,0.000027414882,0.00025983815,0.011377966,0.9786147,0.0071173864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008481654,0.000018660236,0.0026672296,0.00026660113,0.000012031004,0.00078714424,0.0056005376,0.000067583955,0.00032818812,0.004819634,0.9853893,0.000034710232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07542052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2619147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9245795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028128163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00614099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14996308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991543072","doi":"","title":"Hryniak: Two Years Later: The Multiple Applications of ‘That Summary Judgment Case’ From the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Summary judgment; Context (archaeology); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.03169144729742371,"score_gpt":0.27704125315633327,"score_spread":0.24534980585890956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991543072","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076966606,0.06192588,0.003025296,0.5364699,0.0118754925,0.00016122029,0.0005843343,0.00008314341,0.3089082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60542035,0.024202732,0.0019948864,0.2131444,0.0018949955,0.00008991824,0.00026811342,0.00023746047,0.15274712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99059606,0.0010441829,0.00027091315,0.0011966041,0.0048255078,0.0020667017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99298143,0.002121872,0.00028680684,0.00029288005,0.002982406,0.001334541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004319238,0.00043160844,0.00058179104,0.0012789567,0.027398374,0.010382752,0.0021043068,0.007803397,0.004220086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017011173,0.0004956753,0.000556104,0.0031061324,0.01182889,0.0050765052,0.0034875928,0.015611887,0.00047743134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059845224,0.00003289716,0.004257061,0.00025740324,0.00004124501,0.005056161,0.077993125,0.00022696055,0.00093661196,0.44646883,0.39724824,0.0674217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147322635,0.000016208272,0.008603418,0.00071113644,0.00003556774,0.0011613817,0.033090066,0.00019334002,0.00061511394,0.009212497,0.94621825,0.00012830869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96803737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98782176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09355876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09355876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13576092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6788195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992507364","doi":"","title":"Liability for the acts of third parties : in the aftermath of stolen cars and the Canadian case of Rankin v J.J","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Duty; Supreme court; Duty of care; Accident (philosophy); Criminal liability; Contributory negligence; High Court","score_opus":0.019005930799874414,"score_gpt":0.2415367098465616,"score_spread":0.22253077904668717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992507364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055355586,0.010777496,0.0018994287,0.5529043,0.0017303694,0.00010736978,0.00037569113,0.00009826624,0.37675142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6522621,0.006236057,0.001228541,0.23105519,0.0013566107,0.0000844415,0.0001598724,0.00009194193,0.10752522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866649,0.0011138769,0.00034532978,0.00089199934,0.00495611,0.0060277754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883018,0.004878159,0.0006083563,0.00041052894,0.0039699185,0.0018311929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077341837,0.0007976939,0.00083046197,0.0018561746,0.037224583,0.00992893,0.006590499,0.037632026,0.0056555416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023423959,0.00080359756,0.0019383442,0.0026515445,0.018682191,0.0032828678,0.0043562516,0.019240394,0.0007558326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087952394,0.000039710187,0.0034158947,0.00008938158,0.0000663495,0.004521613,0.014869336,0.00077770394,0.00045289582,0.7225501,0.2428622,0.010266872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020969176,0.0000910733,0.019722238,0.0011216741,0.00042204824,0.0026651716,0.030630857,0.0021842995,0.0014782798,0.10964019,0.8311211,0.0007134277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98232967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98964345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068328194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068328194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14312688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49575806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992680832","doi":"","title":"McMurrich, W.B. (1842-1939)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Head (geology); Product (mathematics); Work (physics); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.019280158082618824,"score_gpt":0.29094438607655154,"score_spread":0.2716642279939327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992680832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024546091,0.12100495,0.0005210598,0.012375429,0.0046126833,0.0000631581,0.008109924,0.00014744927,0.85071075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016219348,0.019872138,0.0003146356,0.001343628,0.00043792257,0.000044272096,0.0010077667,0.000073266216,0.96068704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997758,0.000017317914,0.000010289038,0.000056695484,0.00009079607,0.000049139464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998888,0.000014775584,0.000016198765,0.000009108305,0.000052715,0.000018407882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001728141,0.0006672563,0.00024671154,0.0016151405,0.0029676757,0.0012034252,0.00061235466,0.0012183854,0.16816048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076468434,0.00037470364,0.00023008206,0.0022615972,0.00071733625,0.001667152,0.0012067184,0.0014900806,0.051646262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026080608,0.000005021843,0.0003061961,0.00009018433,0.0000031997095,0.00016121789,0.0005403642,0.000033605418,0.00009265702,0.01997688,0.9104132,0.068351395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010505242,0.0000015868253,0.00070074573,0.00006706321,8.786512e-7,0.000038832168,0.00007084834,0.0000029228718,0.000026596723,0.00040900186,0.998679,0.000001444234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18001302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48310533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18001302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037349712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019417764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56255287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6994302393","doi":"","title":"Svěřenský fond","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Civil law (Civil law); Everyday life","score_opus":0.015890966844186408,"score_gpt":0.30886914565691226,"score_spread":0.29297817881272586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6994302393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01014779,0.04730114,0.007257997,0.009684244,0.006127253,0.00017071469,0.008262966,0.0016541968,0.9093937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117521785,0.040609207,0.009930627,0.0014662232,0.00091970025,0.00026999327,0.005235599,0.0024453548,0.8216015],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969688,0.00036662663,0.00027475675,0.00085352006,0.0012145801,0.00032163915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903,0.00020489359,0.0000981419,0.0002047258,0.00025995384,0.00020230132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015803085,0.0014105883,0.0011908885,0.0026812507,0.0024398747,0.009304376,0.0010650697,0.0019021337,0.19728601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042617703,0.0005888279,0.00075023714,0.0023956047,0.0016960002,0.0037294428,0.0047986293,0.003908644,0.1414569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022748287,0.00011804707,0.0017066025,0.0015973542,0.00005332314,0.0008674268,0.0017009166,0.0010541388,0.002261214,0.2319003,0.27665645,0.48185676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009535753,0.000012888074,0.0006494544,0.00032815276,0.000007457935,0.00030941554,0.0001997436,0.00011565169,0.00072193303,0.007463262,0.99016917,0.000013458483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057857595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005587214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19728601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032206164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005574094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65998745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996154831","doi":"","title":"Reference re: Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Legislation","score_opus":0.037478818990681895,"score_gpt":0.2663550254654193,"score_spread":0.2288762064747374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996154831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011562176,0.006231009,0.000509423,0.11503192,0.005862385,0.0003893233,0.0031101464,0.0003411133,0.8569625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04924511,0.0016605573,0.00034893455,0.1169149,0.001201737,0.00030440622,0.0004936088,0.00014399577,0.82968676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193597,0.0006213281,0.00042595385,0.0008765402,0.0030659202,0.0030742984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99129,0.0027777636,0.00025787097,0.00063271157,0.0040482846,0.0009934197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034456865,0.0012524305,0.0012596229,0.0046838117,0.029161373,0.013411147,0.005186415,0.044842593,0.053658023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015743973,0.0016471925,0.0010832027,0.004112526,0.00531373,0.0041831676,0.0040342994,0.022373505,0.009677708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032454638,0.000039507224,0.0007774257,0.0000922616,0.000020510117,0.00030449408,0.0015638946,0.00010584808,0.00026062634,0.090641245,0.89864504,0.0075166626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003631958,0.000019253474,0.0061531584,0.0005053998,0.000067948386,0.00009459709,0.0030634203,0.00015310859,0.000418486,0.008739485,0.9806261,0.00012264829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9239714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96948147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076028585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043002013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09048308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3120029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996225851","doi":"","title":"Review of C. Nicholls, Corporate Finance and Canadian Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Corporate governance; Corporate finance; Work (physics); Debt","score_opus":0.035138146597853526,"score_gpt":0.27367971133807256,"score_spread":0.23854156474021904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996225851","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007194828,0.9683363,0.00007118279,0.023533138,0.0027288662,0.000005961875,0.00016479492,0.0000042441243,0.0050835526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023203513,0.9804981,0.00015870082,0.008926591,0.003002244,0.000008837071,0.00014747074,0.000007735563,0.0049300203],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838424,0.00016455672,0.00010183968,0.00012781649,0.0010671268,0.00015436456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905501,0.0023218517,0.00038105532,0.00015434067,0.0060545793,0.00053811853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030784355,0.00089242257,0.0013971525,0.0112832,0.0023370252,0.0036812783,0.002160035,0.0028923864,0.009918056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009771499,0.00048318537,0.00044989315,0.018068282,0.0037080701,0.003041043,0.0013367388,0.00301475,0.0022986783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011624303,0.00000715193,0.00018653045,0.0020341296,0.000017499091,0.000034464178,0.0001300672,0.00012654872,0.000039475748,0.014317569,0.9050951,0.077999815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040150185,0.0000033109516,0.0014540303,0.0026730273,0.00001629698,0.00004377291,0.00009515029,0.00002726203,0.000023635861,0.0017951196,0.99385333,0.000011043286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5685126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7637586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43148738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026103014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043236326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.868057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997057325","doi":"","title":"University of Leicester Student Law Review 11, vol. 1","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Tort; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.06624540165440398,"score_gpt":0.3316342171105375,"score_spread":0.26538881545613346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997057325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013823947,0.044770155,0.0005979356,0.080650076,0.0073483083,0.00043628953,0.0023981878,0.00026400667,0.8621527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019756908,0.022941034,0.00049640296,0.07449457,0.002810793,0.0009800129,0.0010256378,0.00024253577,0.87725204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99319625,0.00153651,0.0004420328,0.0007773254,0.0029547433,0.0010932427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325633,0.0026128243,0.0003314607,0.0006418245,0.0027027351,0.00045482235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043929475,0.0008445056,0.0011343462,0.0035183246,0.005430864,0.010818245,0.0018825603,0.009381784,0.1528578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02229794,0.0011364082,0.0005694903,0.0044298624,0.0041465233,0.003601794,0.0032090934,0.007352874,0.07908993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007964208,0.000014091788,0.00020348269,0.00018512669,0.000006210492,0.00006795884,0.00020729427,0.000036117282,0.0000682978,0.032658715,0.9495116,0.017033083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004999838,0.000007982886,0.00063313823,0.00065722736,0.0000044258572,0.000026451691,0.00014148346,0.000026873473,0.000049014146,0.0016006946,0.9968353,0.000012358642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08009514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14708722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1528578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012961537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017314376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5113603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997102580","doi":"","title":"Tate &amp; Lyle: Pure Economic Loss and the Modern Tort of Public Nuisance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; State (computer science); Cause of action; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.11836909988520067,"score_gpt":0.3386049848221775,"score_spread":0.22023588493697682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997102580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053412255,0.016028143,0.0134648895,0.1761875,0.00057830056,0.00009229965,0.00018224998,0.00009698959,0.73995733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86358255,0.0034991205,0.001882195,0.022157077,0.00025306662,0.000053502437,0.0000371751,0.00003337284,0.10850199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942517,0.00088521274,0.00006529833,0.00043098582,0.002230074,0.0021367844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984712,0.00061396474,0.00016800637,0.00014404854,0.0004449525,0.0001579001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023103578,0.00046193466,0.0003738822,0.0013758516,0.012602274,0.009868746,0.0018915613,0.008210284,0.0034286997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005727726,0.00032573257,0.000644171,0.0011934999,0.04751176,0.0046418635,0.003658906,0.0065013706,0.0003344574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005978073,0.000004084556,0.00020458097,0.000013591785,0.0000023645418,0.00010088375,0.0021119334,0.00016688752,0.000044883676,0.9879296,0.007132842,0.0022822765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038026534,0.000033909702,0.0077434657,0.00036293876,0.000039907067,0.00053601776,0.009595726,0.0020461082,0.00062785234,0.54492795,0.43387866,0.0001693822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86896884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89370346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86896884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0583841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03964073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4236083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997245490","doi":"","title":"The Unjust Enrichment Apocalypse in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Adjudication; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Common law","score_opus":0.0763954938719483,"score_gpt":0.3520149378528412,"score_spread":0.2756194439808929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997245490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09280973,0.0077160946,0.0025934468,0.121749975,0.0010589818,0.00009461225,0.00019415934,0.00012655715,0.7736565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8559411,0.002609763,0.0015921874,0.027445847,0.000138603,0.000038628656,0.00006957795,0.00006279493,0.1121016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99352515,0.00049007125,0.00011870429,0.0005655115,0.0031511874,0.0021494806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968454,0.00084950257,0.0001475307,0.00014244384,0.001452157,0.00056301866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019877183,0.0002560279,0.00041633015,0.0011840408,0.025408646,0.009572758,0.0015487138,0.004534616,0.00542057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006432895,0.00038464612,0.00033999782,0.0018331019,0.020080766,0.0016345661,0.0040910877,0.0055139475,0.00034459078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014145642,0.000013620984,0.00080452726,0.00004030529,0.000008068134,0.00038226307,0.0075758575,0.00041015024,0.00022964246,0.93821734,0.04187424,0.010429742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032789187,0.000025822723,0.006974643,0.00036816596,0.00004909942,0.00034110254,0.014837925,0.0019384533,0.0007671021,0.16163549,0.8128718,0.00015767984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99003625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11609589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11609589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17945096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8423386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998481330","doi":"","title":"All Change for Residential Tenancies in Wales","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renting; Leasehold estate; Redevelopment; Key (lock); Rental housing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Real property; Residential property","score_opus":0.24223991311843074,"score_gpt":0.4035100150585892,"score_spread":0.16127010194015845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998481330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04593733,0.017824648,0.0034685517,0.15839264,0.02249254,0.0009802555,0.0073272926,0.00072806544,0.7428486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10522111,0.007256096,0.0037118841,0.09184132,0.0019568445,0.0010698523,0.003282105,0.00025647515,0.7854044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215937,0.0011808893,0.0006446453,0.000523488,0.0030536458,0.0024380896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563795,0.00082681543,0.00029410725,0.0003397489,0.0021130675,0.0007883808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004498946,0.00042977798,0.0004984615,0.0016087758,0.004760533,0.0059082145,0.0017726531,0.005735571,0.030707223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013202201,0.00073275296,0.0011692267,0.0016767643,0.0017235334,0.003182264,0.0051401984,0.0066442844,0.009282433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070503,0.00008550029,0.0024129667,0.00075569574,0.000022867045,0.0007708692,0.00432485,0.00033918,0.0012896357,0.15469109,0.76802653,0.06721028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014569292,0.00005201551,0.009244866,0.00027979337,0.000008197314,0.0002324119,0.00131353,0.00005328733,0.00014778254,0.0018484531,0.98676026,0.000044753408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2526268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3794362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2526268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009969121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030042991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5023127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998842309","doi":"","title":"The Attorney Generalâs Obligation to Report Breaches of Rights in Proposed Legislation: How the Canadian and New Zealand Reporting Cultures Differ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Jurisdiction; Charter; Legislation; Independence (probability theory); Bill of rights","score_opus":0.015416064659273808,"score_gpt":0.21344332782847497,"score_spread":0.19802726316920116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998842309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69119173,0.0055484814,0.0035277305,0.052376613,0.00026812436,0.00016077064,0.00025252966,0.000037283007,0.24663673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991964,0.0012982488,0.00092023506,0.0016000213,0.000020408772,0.000028884147,0.000055925393,0.000026938296,0.0040852944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9299506,0.021817988,0.0034264382,0.0035439886,0.03426458,0.006996523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88917804,0.04168629,0.012681955,0.005106572,0.044819597,0.00652751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041507002,0.00021209131,0.0004577176,0.0043321024,0.01879962,0.017905911,0.002436465,0.0018774611,0.0021637846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122678734,0.0006251214,0.00045058716,0.0070616254,0.027868953,0.007888561,0.006570048,0.004058368,0.00018990148],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010078071,0.00007050734,0.07902322,0.00017251982,0.00006420795,0.0005732898,0.5811237,0.00038538218,0.0008374934,0.26018628,0.008905622,0.06855704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033932483,0.000057979407,0.2568258,0.0008421766,0.000113772105,0.00033058724,0.5843789,0.00069418974,0.0010678165,0.014627451,0.14077729,0.0002501397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9595719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9662199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117522456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117522456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15190685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8526891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998888891","doi":"","title":"ATU, Local 508 v Halifax (Regional Municipality)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Grievance; Jurisdiction; Discipline; Suspension (topology)","score_opus":0.03669377881909151,"score_gpt":0.3205816287450366,"score_spread":0.28388784992594507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998888891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033713974,0.0026327085,0.0005806297,0.027216675,0.0007124432,0.00009811325,0.001826083,0.0002558943,0.9329635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20463066,0.0006574311,0.000452179,0.021894725,0.00012568808,0.00011349136,0.0005666329,0.000061013634,0.77149814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941206,0.00007361278,0.000014350408,0.000076700315,0.00011580518,0.00030749256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999566,0.00008990839,0.000023302486,0.000022973072,0.00016742994,0.00013027138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052955066,0.0002989102,0.0001777531,0.0005061479,0.0108112255,0.0029357949,0.0007841442,0.0039035175,0.063856825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012614338,0.00033932718,0.000284744,0.00034960752,0.0009159921,0.00087865046,0.0011119022,0.0021045483,0.008637511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009458226,0.000039934574,0.00620149,0.00010733152,0.000010776533,0.0017714278,0.0035294124,0.00018964852,0.0009777583,0.11040306,0.85283357,0.023840996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036021618,0.000043684835,0.011723727,0.00019287762,0.000023226785,0.00043699396,0.0035496186,0.00024226145,0.00079433713,0.0046721506,0.9782566,0.000028441798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40403825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68104416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59596175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054970686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071852244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.803373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999717023","doi":"","title":"The Deification of Process in Canada's Duty to Consult: Tsleil-Waututh Nation v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Process (computing); Work (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.013369160069457202,"score_gpt":0.2618970038937613,"score_spread":0.2485278438243041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999717023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121446826,0.0037120453,0.0046262266,0.35472703,0.0009336434,0.00037939198,0.000537165,0.00013091844,0.51350665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7466232,0.0012293602,0.003244988,0.10938634,0.00019755082,0.00020282742,0.000092305876,0.000110925095,0.13891251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824759,0.002261035,0.00052240404,0.0013636572,0.0052740923,0.00810303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885048,0.004482824,0.00043300143,0.0003664127,0.0038669074,0.0023460556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097624585,0.00064309174,0.00079432764,0.001960506,0.043575037,0.020362426,0.0059999316,0.03395428,0.0067933993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022781698,0.0014062104,0.0011162477,0.0027232545,0.021898659,0.004857392,0.0071483273,0.02513035,0.00046060898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035139503,0.000037976384,0.0021842192,0.0000369266,0.000018700592,0.0005007415,0.014896765,0.00060924276,0.0003267308,0.931087,0.0445901,0.0056765582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003160186,0.00008878615,0.023002021,0.001012109,0.00028350536,0.0006053899,0.05851644,0.0064643347,0.0021138992,0.21621151,0.69079643,0.00058952504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99713326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1518122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1518122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40502802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98377764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999801020","doi":"","title":"Developments in Contract Law: The 2020-2021 Term – Appeals to Fairness","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Term (time); Confusion; Supreme court; Good faith; Control (management); Undue influence","score_opus":0.018666002131941,"score_gpt":0.2957747861899201,"score_spread":0.2771087840579791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999801020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053960163,0.03210447,0.011473457,0.1783891,0.0022799817,0.00009857353,0.00020511675,0.000049678227,0.7214395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8841339,0.0075427154,0.0051571634,0.041647334,0.0011678063,0.000072621646,0.000113108625,0.00005500286,0.06011046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98704034,0.0018820331,0.00022053783,0.0007081197,0.0079525625,0.0021964454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953054,0.00161507,0.00021285788,0.00016894164,0.0019283136,0.0007694141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008985518,0.00027515815,0.00029601835,0.001953626,0.013066099,0.013399927,0.0017045374,0.008395688,0.002269353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011590969,0.0003571754,0.0005808391,0.0021499628,0.028336816,0.0049899253,0.003060766,0.010434672,0.0003766117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004524528,0.0000043080927,0.00018245997,0.000008635538,9.578439e-7,0.000059554415,0.0016548842,0.00008430208,0.000069477916,0.99030507,0.0046186284,0.0030072124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013058964,0.000031577856,0.0047116117,0.00028585654,0.000009618935,0.00026764112,0.0051938915,0.0011449691,0.0004924998,0.42366108,0.56412184,0.00006637603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7423268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7104835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7423268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09561406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066170655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6937318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999924425","doi":"","title":"Disclaimers and Exclusion Clauses as Risk-Allocation Devices in Canadian Tort and Contract Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Exclusion clause; Breach of contract; Delict; Damages; Privity of contract; Indemnity","score_opus":0.011229283807738194,"score_gpt":0.280322071968568,"score_spread":0.2690927881608298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999924425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05964098,0.0033491275,0.021887494,0.03246804,0.0003551575,0.00020665502,0.0003210889,0.00010129918,0.88167024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828152,0.0015970531,0.007071336,0.0036143998,0.00028426282,0.00017948316,0.00007893017,0.00010287515,0.104256466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97634333,0.0048612137,0.0010906254,0.0022091698,0.008951507,0.0065441364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695061,0.019128429,0.001749057,0.0019369085,0.006046416,0.001633039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014343756,0.0010305964,0.0011780217,0.0049172393,0.01986946,0.02535633,0.004301054,0.015958134,0.011220798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045280706,0.0013282412,0.0014466103,0.00600462,0.04438465,0.012202234,0.0059314347,0.014003489,0.00077377155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006189199,0.000004977545,0.00010518332,0.0000056672893,0.0000010611276,0.000014177867,0.00081472413,0.00013065855,0.000017737975,0.9963536,0.0013159825,0.0012301087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004894715,0.000014220922,0.00154506,0.0002067498,0.000060425173,0.00006586257,0.0027570885,0.002987594,0.0002921933,0.927841,0.06408571,0.00009513615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8444623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85543364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15553772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079110496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.101072274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5739895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999932098","doi":"","title":"Does it Need an Intervention? An Examination of Interveners in Business Cases at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Legislation","score_opus":0.019189820405070914,"score_gpt":0.2893317314313426,"score_spread":0.2701419110262717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999932098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61316174,0.0053594764,0.0025687672,0.10719145,0.0003456026,0.0006780462,0.00027133877,0.00007353218,0.27035004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96780473,0.0012315196,0.0005840347,0.015575484,0.000099590114,0.00014855449,0.000057681114,0.000031425167,0.014466982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96525574,0.0055180015,0.0006629636,0.0018280318,0.007930062,0.018805154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94392663,0.034988232,0.0036142685,0.0009165717,0.008641432,0.007912815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016674286,0.000479162,0.0010367483,0.004002152,0.047663487,0.015044289,0.0059076687,0.021101726,0.007915802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07544523,0.0009280669,0.00093525177,0.005381637,0.018822664,0.0044373954,0.0059259124,0.018344015,0.00051124254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037205257,0.0008548935,0.07434045,0.00035265737,0.00019008451,0.0057699583,0.1104074,0.0019187165,0.0010612796,0.7047329,0.056507234,0.043492433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006547855,0.00040814318,0.20979548,0.0021757227,0.0009255088,0.0013080799,0.38358718,0.006571041,0.002576341,0.109743,0.28167287,0.0005819677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95940113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.912493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.087507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25786424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6349107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000094823","doi":"","title":"Economic Torts in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.01340024501506362,"score_gpt":0.2573041088783631,"score_spread":0.24390386386329946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000094823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1360177,0.009622656,0.0015067589,0.12501012,0.0010316786,0.00021722763,0.0018737195,0.00012874865,0.7245913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6449424,0.0053265905,0.0011104224,0.035964087,0.00036512723,0.00012614935,0.00039555272,0.000110197434,0.31165943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99120796,0.0005783001,0.00024224346,0.0006726342,0.002924759,0.004374075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932492,0.001301832,0.00029799528,0.0002689061,0.0027766218,0.0021055343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032482273,0.00062580575,0.0010899594,0.0037155626,0.03133264,0.013195959,0.0034602438,0.013693973,0.016815878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012892231,0.001131206,0.0013842066,0.00476492,0.007672755,0.0020974493,0.004375495,0.011480772,0.00084267004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005025668,0.00007801148,0.0064011947,0.000049263384,0.000053628526,0.00045990624,0.0023024804,0.0015684619,0.0001159854,0.87250996,0.10464641,0.011764485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000148639,0.000060258102,0.042726543,0.00064920867,0.00025426308,0.0003902841,0.00989255,0.0052614673,0.00053769216,0.11212916,0.8276133,0.00033661298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1599624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1599624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2995707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9743245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000428438","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Law Workshop","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Constitution; Duty of care; Payment","score_opus":0.024045821366587943,"score_gpt":0.29364702673969373,"score_spread":0.2696012053731058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000428438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050499104,0.01313832,0.0035409338,0.2871812,0.034889422,0.00027685676,0.000909283,0.0005069363,0.65450716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025497485,0.0054252245,0.001625732,0.033599973,0.0038501325,0.00025166984,0.000538904,0.00020271943,0.92900825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687874,0.0005613429,0.000086837834,0.0003487742,0.0012668269,0.0008575133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983975,0.00020439495,0.000047299636,0.000084171596,0.000681219,0.00058532663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057100668,0.00072258565,0.0005901032,0.0010815071,0.007892645,0.00817694,0.0019697524,0.008254198,0.08358373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045949584,0.00050873106,0.0011980183,0.00079252897,0.002740199,0.0033722473,0.0049359826,0.007859398,0.024153316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019624178,0.000058760488,0.00010736608,0.00002709392,0.0000029220691,0.00011245658,0.00021440344,0.00008870437,0.00012321655,0.02514939,0.959793,0.014303108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047757885,0.0000065400227,0.00025306008,0.00007424211,0.0000017145076,0.000022014347,0.00034917943,0.000064498236,0.00009631835,0.0024991075,0.99661994,0.000008658034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043187622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08562118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08358373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013324471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02031268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2796154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001353669","doi":"","title":"Janet Walker &amp; Barry Glaspell on Jurisdiction &amp; Conflicts of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Class (philosophy); Conflict of laws; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.04579913776804807,"score_gpt":0.30648697739242736,"score_spread":0.2606878396243793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001353669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016044308,0.044219986,0.000892397,0.3710237,0.004442655,0.000062931605,0.0002845237,0.00005957552,0.57740986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051792663,0.036539774,0.0017489173,0.3753321,0.0027917305,0.00031033368,0.00012265598,0.0001262609,0.5312355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969523,0.00090707187,0.00013557784,0.00043741113,0.001067316,0.00050026004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969586,0.0020778377,0.00021573399,0.00007670467,0.0003675783,0.00030358793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023031773,0.0007181663,0.00047638803,0.0017074097,0.013127286,0.007689841,0.0019792411,0.019976337,0.025646841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008465448,0.00086620176,0.00055837986,0.0022010952,0.0071515865,0.0069090417,0.004111296,0.0082487585,0.0069622328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007846556,0.0000149584785,0.00023687893,0.00007608034,0.0000027446615,0.00024802456,0.0014508726,0.00007172268,0.00008435859,0.23300087,0.7542108,0.010594771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008490823,0.000006084471,0.00067589217,0.00031550112,0.000003637884,0.00010166281,0.001572761,0.00006172139,0.00006709704,0.03292257,0.9642424,0.000022128954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1383089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28260574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1383089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008655193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01119719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27500767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001687717","doi":"","title":"Le Barreau Canadien au conseil prive.","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Identification (biology); Subject (documents); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.00808376034170533,"score_gpt":0.1947456616631106,"score_spread":0.18666190132140528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001687717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006325485,0.03829993,0.0017678498,0.07658742,0.0058843894,0.000043374923,0.00094535074,0.00043368517,0.8697125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06823995,0.00558955,0.0010975985,0.0091259815,0.0009838414,0.00006578799,0.00023866208,0.00024225427,0.9144165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583983,0.0009400986,0.00011324434,0.0005720309,0.0018098898,0.00072490727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998201,0.0006878005,0.00013855658,0.00016573898,0.0005452333,0.00026167967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002191953,0.0006863866,0.00068968214,0.0012746669,0.0068557896,0.0076096207,0.00090504065,0.0068905614,0.10298813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065184557,0.00048568775,0.0005767313,0.001555171,0.0025436927,0.0034485448,0.0030386844,0.007254435,0.01941207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010446309,0.00004384615,0.0008681385,0.00012755826,0.000012989568,0.00030430977,0.0012161253,0.00012431164,0.00035099825,0.57305896,0.3701113,0.05367701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074800932,0.0000073670476,0.0010716711,0.000078216595,0.0000026369619,0.000114561066,0.00022321013,0.000045196215,0.00016826978,0.005645407,0.99262434,0.000011531382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12393235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14046168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87606764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00796554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009721793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34452957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7003639676","doi":"","title":"Quinquagenaries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Statutory law; Personal property; Security interest; Common law; Property (philosophy); Uniform Commercial Code; Property law","score_opus":0.0256324685808875,"score_gpt":0.29718113276320457,"score_spread":0.27154866418231705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7003639676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005567803,0.005741244,0.0013202727,0.027967146,0.03539962,0.000190181,0.0021792483,0.000789528,0.925856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037920305,0.0014829899,0.00037750823,0.004972478,0.001081277,0.000087687746,0.000565089,0.0003276172,0.9873132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933367,0.00066397316,0.00030576935,0.001073565,0.0033866167,0.0012334181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933996,0.0006867556,0.0002185038,0.0008063812,0.003790596,0.0010982321],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004143368,0.0012676356,0.0010467756,0.0026959623,0.011114291,0.011213764,0.0038582175,0.0057722204,0.50321424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014664081,0.00085264986,0.00092172733,0.0028465157,0.0030589201,0.0056207026,0.006491095,0.007982544,0.19086033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002755684,0.000015914902,0.00009149593,0.00009176902,0.000002597714,0.00008097962,0.0002462466,0.000040503153,0.00007865231,0.090272896,0.8903887,0.018662646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014532641,0.0000022220154,0.00004840628,0.00003393221,5.227217e-7,0.000011547563,0.000042712687,0.000009238464,0.000019461897,0.0008641858,0.99896264,0.000003646839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11124609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16059512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50321424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01524104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01732513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7086046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006030746","doi":"","title":"Sources of Canadian Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03140998783422817,"score_gpt":0.27267507712912253,"score_spread":0.24126508929489437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006030746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012315345,0.0036112925,0.0003592242,0.013894606,0.0012204552,0.00012119253,0.015021502,0.00023287666,0.96430725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021772338,0.004835194,0.0012172457,0.005559121,0.00033107345,0.00013248148,0.005014423,0.0002652885,0.9608728],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940614,0.0002456309,0.00014007791,0.00043202002,0.0037022883,0.0014185142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913148,0.0005195172,0.00013305178,0.00038583207,0.0070038917,0.00064282876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017596756,0.0011478235,0.0007940877,0.014963439,0.021509994,0.011919671,0.0025885848,0.004230621,0.17653559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011458321,0.0010362742,0.0011722735,0.018691862,0.0024275077,0.0023852612,0.0027760009,0.005253035,0.024846694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011819667,0.000013524898,0.00039015338,0.000093489005,0.000007362201,0.000065840046,0.00036472958,0.00007595,0.00003583651,0.112898454,0.87015617,0.015886733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004486767,0.0000013551066,0.0010960256,0.00011266525,0.0000079681795,0.000026278462,0.00025630792,0.000063543834,0.00006572501,0.0031890417,0.99516016,0.000016373408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98690075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99315745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17653559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11167732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19756685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8102795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006146110","doi":"","title":"Substantial &amp; Punitive Costs Awards Against Self-Represented Litigants","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pretext; Government (linguistics); Punitive damages; Subpoena; Circumstantial evidence; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03568888831418636,"score_gpt":0.2975547040892297,"score_spread":0.2618658157750433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006146110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52069855,0.001074692,0.011181944,0.017548189,0.0016309472,0.0008518623,0.00024746693,0.00041105348,0.44635534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679836,0.00027306468,0.0031166577,0.0038721312,0.00033016136,0.00027464423,0.00007515017,0.000030597763,0.024044009],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98182756,0.0056128064,0.0010634512,0.0006880375,0.008109391,0.002698687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98288155,0.0054556243,0.0039336653,0.0017379175,0.002820539,0.003170743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005568113,0.00050836895,0.00030890034,0.0015355224,0.0026710732,0.0038518768,0.001243127,0.0025067767,0.014617497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031318802,0.00022793614,0.0005863978,0.00059728295,0.0022302999,0.0011505531,0.004579749,0.002912231,0.0012649972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007501317,0.0032300646,0.09014459,0.0005132601,0.00029106118,0.004610319,0.0054245903,0.006513737,0.008586042,0.30677575,0.11314523,0.46001524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051271793,0.0061729746,0.3542916,0.0015106974,0.00043221898,0.008027092,0.012961088,0.017832479,0.016717454,0.12588935,0.45493558,0.00071683864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025458084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010130627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014617497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024139923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003042224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048900425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006229806","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Common-Law Canada, 4th ed.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Exposition (narrative); Work (physics); Common law","score_opus":0.015633298011375377,"score_gpt":0.2896932775721003,"score_spread":0.2740599795607249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006229806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021893058,0.30167767,0.0025360463,0.048610736,0.006850974,0.000089087174,0.0031376977,0.00044890336,0.6344596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039351624,0.18464749,0.0030175494,0.010636827,0.0010141546,0.000105090905,0.0017018104,0.00031096514,0.7592145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985984,0.00008490023,0.000048946644,0.00007763263,0.0008872844,0.0003028145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990557,0.00010844624,0.000059665315,0.000035784087,0.0005132574,0.00022705989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078372663,0.00084395654,0.0005441186,0.0026668098,0.0067043616,0.008844316,0.0014000529,0.0022471328,0.0347068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026714709,0.00073096715,0.00041733764,0.006630247,0.0039585815,0.0043617254,0.0019064768,0.0025721658,0.007868674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053536264,0.000007094473,0.00029514462,0.00013756924,0.0000026618764,0.000092245886,0.0019013472,0.00017347281,0.000051865554,0.088500716,0.86503595,0.0437966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.40535e-7,0.0000013924579,0.0006227677,0.00019446807,0.0000012994047,0.00005039173,0.0007935447,0.00004190789,0.00001234329,0.0032067674,0.9950682,0.000005981207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92342246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9760591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076577544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058255732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10968378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42267692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006360973","doi":"","title":"TEMEIURILE CONSTITUIRII UNEI FIDUCII","year":2024,"lang":"ro","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Order (exchange); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.35134280121299255,"score_gpt":0.6235262749262338,"score_spread":0.27218347371324125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006360973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09852324,0.0041928934,0.017305441,0.0045008953,0.00044693606,0.00030320822,0.0014075616,0.00010749915,0.87321234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61108255,0.0026713237,0.016463371,0.0019776595,0.00018996923,0.0004076147,0.0016575361,0.00030219933,0.3652477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969273,0.000641357,0.00014591377,0.00056625245,0.00096943055,0.0007497096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979377,0.000630246,0.0003049847,0.00037475387,0.00059229933,0.0001599964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021788098,0.0005761297,0.00035412292,0.002432714,0.005165574,0.009238432,0.0009097934,0.001242318,0.030913098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004831372,0.00038086885,0.00060631434,0.0034149867,0.004455673,0.004474111,0.0037700278,0.0021796965,0.004408037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007723675,0.00004132254,0.010730167,0.0003064473,0.000021228665,0.00045385986,0.033849243,0.00019791644,0.0011023738,0.8512931,0.028085483,0.07384171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005360506,0.000042404346,0.022150146,0.0004312761,0.000024564582,0.00038985425,0.023673058,0.0002636779,0.0018306986,0.018792761,0.932368,0.000028238388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02686379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08661703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030913098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007597193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061936034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103414595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006430918","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Common-Law Canada, 3rd ed.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.021679072489119627,"score_gpt":0.27901837057808193,"score_spread":0.2573392980889623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006430918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018772823,0.22593816,0.0022310007,0.06197721,0.0022907963,0.00006785434,0.004409172,0.0004164045,0.7007922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05151788,0.12448363,0.0019428101,0.0073800455,0.0006995357,0.00007705523,0.001814379,0.00038016815,0.8117045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986259,0.000121696896,0.000057932546,0.00010687758,0.0007404829,0.00034710797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875486,0.00018019088,0.00006684411,0.0000664363,0.0006845924,0.00024705887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096298254,0.0008342906,0.00049849146,0.0030809212,0.007770993,0.009674688,0.0014573566,0.0036153297,0.072244704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003563682,0.00096608204,0.00042669103,0.00771493,0.0042972392,0.0071819937,0.0021231833,0.0027259146,0.012595915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051493835,0.000006837475,0.0003344553,0.00011951404,0.0000030240872,0.000099936035,0.0012336946,0.00017165241,0.00003979027,0.12459067,0.8348043,0.038590897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001410673,0.0000014857618,0.00080922275,0.00027122776,0.000002073189,0.000053695185,0.0009481551,0.000075646276,0.000019658093,0.0066572344,0.9911526,0.000007540861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94082814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97824436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072244704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062492035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08236176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45341355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006491626","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Common-Law Canada, 2nd ed.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.015211561266571822,"score_gpt":0.27647345750171926,"score_spread":0.26126189623514745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006491626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024438307,0.23796362,0.0023336972,0.06782016,0.0022724392,0.00007248928,0.004701337,0.00037161136,0.68202096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06849964,0.13785258,0.0021563715,0.007952628,0.0007503752,0.00008341495,0.0020297312,0.00035585777,0.7803194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985489,0.00012553763,0.00006238695,0.00010663977,0.0007659871,0.00039051837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987017,0.00018190575,0.00007536409,0.00006181335,0.0007183057,0.0002609656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009373897,0.00079805887,0.00048503766,0.00330354,0.008080744,0.009594425,0.0014955578,0.0035943144,0.06493851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034388767,0.00089467614,0.00040060497,0.008318429,0.0043650423,0.0072644553,0.0021211093,0.0026910037,0.010009987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058582236,0.0000078703015,0.0004426585,0.00013196644,0.0000031422849,0.00011902442,0.0015907168,0.00018999509,0.000042113374,0.15131682,0.80550563,0.04064418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015969963,0.00000176264,0.0010836592,0.00029098324,0.0000022978681,0.00006659754,0.001261642,0.00008603515,0.000022130745,0.0074746287,0.9896998,0.000008822122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9442215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06788957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06788957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08820363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49257565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70070498","doi":"","title":"No Presumptions! Joint Custody in the British Columbia Court of Appeal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Appeal; Law; High Court; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Legal guardian; Joint (building); Law of the case; Court of record; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Engineering","score_opus":0.05972135360740332,"score_gpt":0.2873809353122113,"score_spread":0.227659581704808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70070498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093703926,0.009335374,0.011167899,0.11132012,0.0017129321,0.00021677982,0.00050269224,0.00013019094,0.77191013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768133,0.002046812,0.0038297202,0.025546685,0.00031526238,0.00016147006,0.00018252234,0.00007415587,0.091030136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98138875,0.0035806992,0.0008126145,0.0021335287,0.0077312607,0.0043531186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888958,0.004280281,0.00077106507,0.0010476088,0.0037519857,0.0012532981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009305734,0.00032516045,0.0006323197,0.0017318338,0.018134246,0.0124200005,0.0026157247,0.0070264884,0.0077339243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028261058,0.00066450465,0.00041628254,0.002609723,0.011965038,0.0044907415,0.004466673,0.013168454,0.0008404119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002119355,0.000022189033,0.0027594797,0.00004954248,0.000016778546,0.00039668372,0.0057647936,0.00084830046,0.0002135736,0.93151385,0.038997587,0.01939605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009359562,0.00006724822,0.022832988,0.001065387,0.000095338466,0.0006266726,0.011832741,0.0031045468,0.000755874,0.27850622,0.68071824,0.00030116437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8849007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92971104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11509931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055664912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075867474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4038791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008687290","doi":"","title":"The common law doctrine of aboriginal title in the New Zealand and Canadian courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchArchive–Te Puna Rangahau (Victoria University of Wellington)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Doctrine; High Court; Statutory law; Legislation","score_opus":0.014419500423538772,"score_gpt":0.29927820734134586,"score_spread":0.28485870691780707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008687290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07472561,0.008618155,0.00541683,0.05247604,0.0006979657,0.00013853099,0.00025303848,0.000044607623,0.85762924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.924647,0.0024022278,0.0027356772,0.0042367023,0.0002695099,0.00009485333,0.00006199703,0.000032572207,0.065519474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98989093,0.0017407886,0.00038315597,0.0011042403,0.0044878554,0.002393024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900073,0.0039983806,0.0005683265,0.00073507085,0.0035432272,0.0011475781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007600332,0.00030633624,0.00079577614,0.0023770074,0.016857997,0.015475268,0.0027640553,0.0070687872,0.005697414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020641385,0.00055712176,0.0006474538,0.0025616663,0.03604621,0.005274229,0.0033242553,0.008520958,0.00036697276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008629654,0.000007071674,0.00035703334,0.000019445648,0.0000042899437,0.000058771195,0.00493653,0.00009806047,0.00006930509,0.98776627,0.003489673,0.003184933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007069515,0.00005350332,0.015584122,0.0010742858,0.00008522852,0.0002923327,0.023267934,0.0018268302,0.0005497546,0.6833998,0.27362087,0.00017462194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.931896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9397414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06810403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06279307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11543566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45559776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009908890","doi":"","title":"Frustration of Contract","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Frustration; Frustration of purpose; Force majeure; Intervention (counseling); Subject (documents); Doctrine","score_opus":0.018871944019572588,"score_gpt":0.31312658891202805,"score_spread":0.29425464489245545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009908890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011417615,0.0045029516,0.017653227,0.046574958,0.001105899,0.00008607506,0.00011080625,0.00010913664,0.9184393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79096454,0.004804637,0.0036911839,0.025860408,0.0011055792,0.0002365991,0.0001306101,0.00024209164,0.17296438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98184216,0.0067942073,0.00063007494,0.0013241185,0.0059834514,0.0034260484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163944,0.003312318,0.0009932185,0.0010504528,0.0021540462,0.0008505001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067180465,0.0005242852,0.0004828732,0.0010409193,0.009528739,0.009444119,0.0015080285,0.0038328548,0.012160841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020321641,0.0003324375,0.0006155003,0.0010966281,0.029913248,0.008262145,0.0063246978,0.006997892,0.0017788156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004699693,0.0000043464393,0.00018233841,0.000016866368,0.00000241631,0.000069958776,0.0036301007,0.000092911294,0.00003531715,0.97052234,0.021419005,0.0040196134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009172781,0.000020698244,0.0007795566,0.00024897896,0.0000063358166,0.00045186255,0.005744254,0.0005976116,0.00017272183,0.33466342,0.6572698,0.00003570522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03941024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022399984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03941024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020312408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0133434795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14737749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010788264","doi":"","title":"Justifying the application of the theory of efficient breach specifically within the context of commercial contracting.&#13;\\n","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goldcorp","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Limiting; Frame (networking); Meaning (existential); Derogation; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.0284670752440129,"score_gpt":0.2569778250280782,"score_spread":0.2285107497840653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010788264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010513822,0.0025953257,0.2904473,0.0277242,0.0006693538,0.00013498352,0.00010690977,0.00007198023,0.6677361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78997064,0.0034056108,0.080752715,0.007694982,0.0012228576,0.0007196046,0.00020480683,0.0001685534,0.11586027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99181783,0.0034366478,0.00035474077,0.0010861042,0.0024638665,0.00084084936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926479,0.0040924116,0.00058430573,0.0014065091,0.0010959426,0.00017291046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077889925,0.00064786244,0.0005999294,0.0016352736,0.0039783968,0.006449202,0.0023424146,0.0063720243,0.014337853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012217854,0.0004956309,0.0018749749,0.00086209056,0.02729134,0.009413292,0.005570691,0.006439539,0.0028351261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.952241e-7,0.0000021052635,0.00001910487,0.0000048706097,6.950849e-7,0.000010335438,0.00008745466,0.00012662947,0.000010204841,0.9988933,0.00035738814,0.00048736815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037370967,0.000008328763,0.00008251525,0.000065862725,0.0000030800588,0.000059129685,0.00021351535,0.0016170214,0.0001850793,0.97313946,0.024614574,0.000007746495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038830137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036766971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014337853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062893596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00439189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04796493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011110991","doi":"","title":"Legislation, Magistrates, and Judges: High Law and Low Law in England and the Empire","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Common law; Comparative law; Public law; Legislation; Legal history; Israeli law; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.013252846826782601,"score_gpt":0.26727592349472873,"score_spread":0.2540230766679461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011110991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69668573,0.03325545,0.00028372757,0.12685728,0.0006194202,0.000021964413,0.00012282142,0.000021590256,0.14213207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96667373,0.0025931932,0.00009700239,0.004264462,0.00011495099,0.000013563467,0.000021960363,0.000013544259,0.026207589],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692684,0.0011892339,0.00012713028,0.00030065412,0.0004651407,0.0009909449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595684,0.001892184,0.00055042276,0.00011824424,0.00045203732,0.0010303266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002792064,0.00013509062,0.00031668105,0.0016370838,0.012276831,0.009317589,0.00094379,0.0028415772,0.004161584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054052435,0.00041179548,0.0000872755,0.0013563631,0.022226013,0.0033589322,0.0037076366,0.0040947944,0.00041056762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007139033,0.000095951,0.030015385,0.00025530992,0.00001072595,0.0013982115,0.63501215,0.00008708588,0.00057148444,0.27554232,0.03051362,0.02642643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003524078,0.000071428796,0.20326295,0.0015279005,0.00002182964,0.00047512894,0.31800142,0.00014377065,0.00029927277,0.025633583,0.45045164,0.00007577988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40132695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68583584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40132695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021047655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009822576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.797982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011427815","doi":"","title":"Lost Synergies and M&amp;A Damages: Considering Cineplex v Cineworld","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Shareholder; Database transaction; Structuring; Reliability (semiconductor); Economic Justice; Transaction cost; Limiting","score_opus":0.023943980501535293,"score_gpt":0.2468295458419001,"score_spread":0.2228855653403648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011427815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23148853,0.005872382,0.016937567,0.19314672,0.000549416,0.0003083153,0.0004477092,0.00009278003,0.5511566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663295,0.0008866686,0.0024181192,0.01832371,0.00053166464,0.00010415988,0.000051979285,0.00002364012,0.011330514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844216,0.0051596994,0.000786615,0.0014899758,0.0050968304,0.003045249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97965276,0.01445222,0.0014285446,0.0008983267,0.0025521861,0.0010159828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014010403,0.00048647352,0.0008612358,0.0025549156,0.0075978977,0.013762079,0.0027160135,0.017786363,0.00454666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035372302,0.0006185554,0.0012091652,0.0017434792,0.01438097,0.009635117,0.0045665777,0.009662018,0.0004115455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006983425,0.000080961414,0.0035990523,0.000053497228,0.000057418783,0.0020638772,0.0022011164,0.0027923326,0.0004070066,0.97308016,0.0095087,0.0060860408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001356053,0.0005259041,0.011488655,0.000516743,0.000244766,0.0016330157,0.01172126,0.013562717,0.0016274893,0.8396167,0.118615255,0.00031204242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057230633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092470035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057230633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012233286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009329715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11379498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7012834978","doi":"","title":"Betterment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Property (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Offset (computer science)","score_opus":0.030021937429469354,"score_gpt":0.32135388121977515,"score_spread":0.2913319437903058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7012834978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014735134,0.0014890085,0.020949556,0.012406387,0.0012603014,0.00037979038,0.00048647512,0.00028194842,0.94801134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48641014,0.0019121933,0.011171151,0.019681994,0.001075094,0.00058785477,0.00060272176,0.0002949603,0.47826383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808288,0.0030612743,0.0015344438,0.0033736106,0.008095797,0.0031060977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99022853,0.0016808913,0.0011099903,0.0029539254,0.003484816,0.0005418723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009030664,0.0009781426,0.0010917328,0.0027417906,0.0049391007,0.009272304,0.0035965438,0.009225679,0.045392897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02119443,0.0006488174,0.0016622301,0.0013011062,0.007877071,0.0114686405,0.00865163,0.007008941,0.008448435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027483658,0.000037402486,0.0011641398,0.00009307911,0.000029651128,0.0004628995,0.0010187015,0.00030855607,0.00037345118,0.9550988,0.021904781,0.019480892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031696654,0.0001705375,0.004286002,0.0006124108,0.000119267206,0.0019327389,0.0017847029,0.0009973805,0.0017738389,0.27926695,0.70889074,0.00013378623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008433397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010394262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045392897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047448487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065862956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014848435","doi":"","title":"'Recognisable Psychiatric Injury' and Tortious Compensability for Pure Mental Harm Claims in Negligence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Harm; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Statutory law; Liability","score_opus":0.06093486466495489,"score_gpt":0.3816917284237612,"score_spread":0.3207568637588063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014848435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13565958,0.003795613,0.035642333,0.11837922,0.0011046374,0.0002991727,0.00015803723,0.00012834057,0.70483303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473855,0.0006804918,0.005297217,0.02171716,0.00069691025,0.0001643558,0.000050816096,0.000025407162,0.023982078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98525536,0.0033359006,0.00083297526,0.0019805464,0.0053246417,0.0032705676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899374,0.0060933186,0.0010158354,0.0013408541,0.00095242425,0.0006601281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013538649,0.00054846174,0.00091500464,0.0022538505,0.008631731,0.0071370727,0.0030227695,0.02182374,0.007855406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024382126,0.0006942602,0.0014134464,0.0009401033,0.040807206,0.0061921976,0.010058782,0.014220534,0.0009788289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068552363,0.00002329359,0.00083144073,0.000015080449,0.000006435908,0.00045975254,0.0011356673,0.00014241035,0.00010372458,0.99282515,0.0021472778,0.0023027947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004869514,0.00006659525,0.0040973388,0.00022391156,0.000030491212,0.0013036549,0.0010646642,0.001312398,0.00032728913,0.9568688,0.03459556,0.000060540675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0286734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051689755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0286734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006434769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012404936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07160002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015071583","doi":"","title":"Rose-Colored Glasses, Opaque Financial Reporting, and Investor Blues: Enron as Con and the Vulnerability of Canadian Corporate Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Corporate governance; Corporate law; Investor protection","score_opus":0.04650038236576022,"score_gpt":0.27918585321462214,"score_spread":0.23268547084886193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015071583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31324705,0.0048489235,0.0022670536,0.17276144,0.00022560528,0.00005456569,0.00023970596,0.000046657868,0.50630903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655377,0.0010804617,0.00037991957,0.0070780166,0.00006448431,0.00001208505,0.000016624585,0.000016484973,0.025814299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968978,0.00059427787,0.000065716886,0.00027607905,0.0010404271,0.0011257189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127555,0.004015468,0.0010625288,0.0003619869,0.0022197438,0.0010647548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050506084,0.00022323112,0.0002836642,0.0018283259,0.014974759,0.011173562,0.0013944136,0.0060954876,0.010835158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019519618,0.00024803515,0.0002895976,0.0018913335,0.01939766,0.0051444164,0.0031831097,0.0055437884,0.0002443376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039023234,0.00003845251,0.011327103,0.000025565987,0.000008416677,0.00018444237,0.021498417,0.00031237816,0.00015351622,0.9261725,0.022392018,0.017848225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048513648,0.0000568838,0.06884105,0.0005768008,0.00013285436,0.00034416607,0.11698161,0.0036397388,0.0010165888,0.5199403,0.28817225,0.00024916438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.939757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06024301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039271306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052268423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28493464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015575355","doi":"","title":"The Symbiosis between Criminal Codes and the Common Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Public law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.030965250057340226,"score_gpt":0.3087707060466157,"score_spread":0.2778054559892755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015575355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14170353,0.012162581,0.10079795,0.114136375,0.000965909,0.000103450395,0.000120946585,0.000094972354,0.62991434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97741747,0.002263264,0.010015064,0.0023061507,0.0004937084,0.000074894306,0.000026918404,0.000031741652,0.0073707597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810884,0.010438347,0.00048591063,0.0016655712,0.0049342,0.001387501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719448,0.0188852,0.00263023,0.0026059425,0.0027158272,0.0012179302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00859837,0.00036627692,0.000467404,0.0055320137,0.007080903,0.010786795,0.0010741216,0.003710449,0.0033691688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023600789,0.00053334294,0.00038815435,0.004550844,0.09147419,0.01601936,0.009227902,0.0060989377,0.00039508505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011434429,0.0000020651987,0.00018669103,0.000006826432,9.783577e-7,0.000020411551,0.0010467905,0.00007533037,0.00001542453,0.9962955,0.000300066,0.0020488256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032575488,0.000008058267,0.0006901952,0.000064301734,0.0000021671701,0.000057860445,0.0013531982,0.00032981424,0.000040464118,0.9775389,0.019901672,0.0000101796895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0185248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016740732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0185248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077950023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011887944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015715054","doi":"","title":"A Truly \"National\" Plumbing Code","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Commission; Building code","score_opus":0.053482952685174556,"score_gpt":0.3482611693992163,"score_spread":0.29477821671404175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015715054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005640864,0.00068468985,0.010857336,0.027207699,0.0016817293,0.00018124524,0.000840461,0.00034030055,0.9525657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1859127,0.0017259478,0.050522167,0.036660675,0.000606511,0.00069976,0.0025480276,0.0003944855,0.7209298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98681194,0.0013691277,0.0005465653,0.00097575836,0.008808495,0.0014880993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865232,0.0006734484,0.00032325814,0.0009443267,0.010449335,0.0010864217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053621414,0.00023997088,0.0003294814,0.0011818706,0.006842235,0.0062528127,0.0013594164,0.0028924113,0.010041062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01140859,0.00032018166,0.00034562105,0.0013725347,0.0046566613,0.002920592,0.002921206,0.004237475,0.0043893806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007816154,0.000017245866,0.0008374404,0.000049780883,0.0000025443135,0.00006490528,0.0010536051,0.00023621647,0.00029151677,0.7163597,0.25595784,0.025121424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025411823,0.000006670466,0.0014891158,0.0000864241,0.0000026933649,0.00009518472,0.0004343972,0.00021644561,0.00014542438,0.013244665,0.9842629,0.000013620994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31752673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4245418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31752673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015080226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07749236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6313571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018362801","doi":"","title":"A Defense of Pure Restitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Triacetin; Hyporeflexia; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.02058712355330489,"score_gpt":0.2602973650451714,"score_spread":0.23971024149186654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018362801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024041835,0.004236327,0.275352,0.07369164,0.0009531019,0.00014357657,0.000107830674,0.00026447332,0.6212093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9011652,0.001834514,0.034506813,0.01670747,0.00085491146,0.0004890985,0.00006120728,0.00018405168,0.044196717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854645,0.007048642,0.0005666928,0.0022017525,0.0034393033,0.0012790718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99132067,0.0041538225,0.00093674054,0.0019869588,0.0012546974,0.00034706865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014390916,0.0007376876,0.0009555362,0.001411623,0.0044722464,0.005544564,0.0025153537,0.005817281,0.006040106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015352692,0.00047485137,0.0012935215,0.0010200192,0.042022336,0.0075638453,0.0064057573,0.009232018,0.0018217181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022603977,0.0000030902281,0.000031785603,0.000008418805,0.000002272853,0.0000060129546,0.00014722205,0.00009001443,0.000015003177,0.99807525,0.0005082206,0.0011104539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147918045,0.000021041866,0.000113918555,0.000056976634,0.0000057535026,0.000041116768,0.00015181067,0.00057836197,0.00015373864,0.9786009,0.020253245,0.000008444577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030355053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002171309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014390916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004099982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00497427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07610732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018607868","doi":"","title":"3 Dividend Stocks for the Second Quarter -- The Motley Fool","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Motley; Dividend; Quarter (Canadian coin); Stock (firearms)","score_opus":0.04373798872365776,"score_gpt":0.3504164148600884,"score_spread":0.30667842613643065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018607868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018943923,0.008550257,0.005949089,0.07031471,0.00267886,0.000059752438,0.0043644714,0.00049003377,0.88864887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24057318,0.0052599986,0.0041984203,0.005902492,0.0017472926,0.00009194945,0.0017976348,0.00035954683,0.7400695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992085,0.000083296116,0.000043049415,0.00011410936,0.0004111482,0.00013994418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865,0.0003051139,0.00017380656,0.00017517526,0.00051994063,0.00017607734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001198243,0.0005793452,0.00052130973,0.0021435777,0.0023144237,0.008479693,0.00083546713,0.0035740647,0.045063257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007772016,0.00024294962,0.0006019756,0.0018939044,0.0011514231,0.0040504695,0.001766453,0.003674694,0.0061832396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036346195,0.000037722293,0.002531564,0.000041930634,0.000011435539,0.00007628293,0.00019883951,0.0004731632,0.00013997768,0.74966264,0.1869295,0.05986051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018340308,0.000024039968,0.007463688,0.00030870448,0.00002040113,0.000121249854,0.00034757436,0.002510353,0.0007987363,0.35086983,0.6374775,0.00003954942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050264023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07030411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050264023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004385615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063424935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15075159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018915029","doi":"","title":"Ettinger Estate v. Jewish Quarter Company","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Appeal; Supreme court; Legislation; Compensation (psychology); Punitive damages; Borough; Quarter (Canadian coin); Financial compensation; Bankruptcy","score_opus":0.019890890614053212,"score_gpt":0.28934166778305964,"score_spread":0.26945077716900645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018915029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030765193,0.0044189757,0.00037445014,0.0822708,0.0030564605,0.00010963918,0.0022883406,0.00021120068,0.87650496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16100237,0.00200699,0.00029725797,0.11415288,0.0016089441,0.00015283444,0.0012964343,0.000060876013,0.7194214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977743,0.000127119,0.00011487026,0.00023754164,0.0008640481,0.00088208786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987042,0.00039290564,0.00009646797,0.000082717255,0.00052542775,0.00019830427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001334786,0.0004860897,0.00030966374,0.0010971319,0.0065059457,0.004184904,0.0015271228,0.0109186815,0.045596454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037627532,0.0006620838,0.000628353,0.00077617535,0.0013032642,0.002092914,0.0014145203,0.0071713054,0.0076740873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013365418,0.00009889933,0.0065448284,0.0001157847,0.000033845154,0.0031332145,0.0013580198,0.00011240661,0.0007425476,0.0928618,0.8697003,0.025164679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006752247,0.00006863828,0.009457424,0.00029250674,0.000046156594,0.000704937,0.00071621017,0.00014646644,0.0005884334,0.0033662843,0.98449105,0.00005427819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15016055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32310304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15016055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005448293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007297781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29857302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019176702","doi":"","title":"The Flaws of Magic Bullet Theory: Retraining Unconscionability to Discretely Target Different Contexts of Unfairness in Contracts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Common law; Proposition; Jurisprudence; Rationalisation; Circumstantial evidence","score_opus":0.017099792195740485,"score_gpt":0.28921647405396905,"score_spread":0.27211668185822857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019176702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046570897,0.007304028,0.25983858,0.2538802,0.0016305925,0.00023167083,0.0002627326,0.0004845433,0.42979676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87007827,0.0027934108,0.060217015,0.027446344,0.0006462946,0.00023234898,0.00006023809,0.00033143815,0.038194694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98491377,0.0034433904,0.00042003565,0.0017072927,0.0077448147,0.0017708573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98962224,0.0044599576,0.00049550657,0.0015865241,0.003044359,0.0007914013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013219973,0.00072547153,0.0011175084,0.0023859842,0.00883373,0.010072342,0.004940636,0.0062238015,0.0059628715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023750529,0.00060541957,0.0010968272,0.0015721516,0.055854335,0.01092616,0.0053452863,0.012339134,0.00087656203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007762797,0.0000051146953,0.00016719251,0.000014556938,0.0000044110143,0.000020179647,0.00094785215,0.00028008767,0.000063113774,0.99125403,0.0018316403,0.00540412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003452387,0.000020608108,0.000606938,0.00013206514,0.000019325547,0.000053092954,0.0009879641,0.0027497308,0.00031663565,0.9520447,0.042977303,0.00005692741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5139912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48783922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5139912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035585973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05212713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019438634","doi":"","title":"A generous interpretation of collateral","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Collateral; Creditor; Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Security interest; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04903484428553077,"score_gpt":0.34887173174082864,"score_spread":0.29983688745529785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019438634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021580877,0.0011486866,0.07832406,0.013732752,0.0005250411,0.00009512767,0.0002818064,0.00014906582,0.8841627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8739134,0.0009511353,0.01611942,0.003244813,0.0005056421,0.00016514404,0.00017336021,0.00017921686,0.104747854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951244,0.0017683345,0.000293265,0.0010094912,0.0012920742,0.00051246956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617034,0.0010754636,0.0004178594,0.0013920681,0.0008014233,0.00014273601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049347924,0.0005832154,0.000559792,0.0012321298,0.003413384,0.005507968,0.0014683799,0.004226806,0.013068522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113481665,0.0004074387,0.0007443087,0.0010416945,0.016277682,0.009075932,0.004743295,0.004722603,0.0019609446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033666108,0.0000012960107,0.000057542504,0.0000066042394,0.0000014272565,0.00003329828,0.00044047207,0.0000627689,0.00007699993,0.9974099,0.00075912295,0.0011471602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014673465,0.00002192487,0.0004640964,0.00008305818,0.00001317866,0.00025519243,0.0005218076,0.00060274085,0.00035214453,0.8821899,0.11546056,0.000020671345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005521315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060358276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013068522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003288855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028706875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043718576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019757246","doi":"","title":"Imputing a common intention in single ownership cases","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yardstick; Entitlement (fair division); Doctrine; Common law; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.06213116781615939,"score_gpt":0.2897732245317526,"score_spread":0.22764205671559318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019757246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4888587,0.00082988705,0.11885355,0.014799897,0.00021309278,0.0005760541,0.00009580556,0.00009788783,0.375675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898482,0.00014423522,0.004955285,0.00081660243,0.00004615036,0.00013752119,0.000016157235,0.000014756831,0.0040211547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9449424,0.02564129,0.0028269787,0.0041377856,0.014022313,0.008429331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9399025,0.039320678,0.0054884753,0.00825864,0.0052205794,0.0018090564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055673603,0.0005828911,0.0014803578,0.0032997113,0.009482314,0.012412779,0.003325012,0.0077785156,0.0026249578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07770209,0.0008198746,0.0017192536,0.002296913,0.049607433,0.012228615,0.015437136,0.010066586,0.00046041847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023851311,0.000041970765,0.002669434,0.000019174226,0.00001689488,0.000611721,0.006274352,0.0005930471,0.00009397388,0.98551637,0.00034573712,0.0037935078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003963106,0.00011776701,0.0030264503,0.00029160627,0.00007058575,0.0005593424,0.007952194,0.0050878334,0.0014676099,0.97269666,0.0086273905,0.000062934145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013764286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021663649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055673603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077735414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011043965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29443365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020378624","doi":"","title":"The Law of Trusts: A Contextual Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Express trust; Key (lock); Constructive trust; Context (archaeology); Common law","score_opus":0.026206157892218668,"score_gpt":0.29233336329937054,"score_spread":0.26612720540715185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020378624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010874461,0.07783927,0.053808764,0.09267285,0.0013039369,0.00014052395,0.0006061728,0.0001339281,0.7626201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8722786,0.05121678,0.016477963,0.008678355,0.0016835668,0.00022098306,0.00022502933,0.00010091969,0.049117714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99447906,0.0024251721,0.00019852292,0.00044675966,0.0016191523,0.0008311944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721646,0.001295056,0.00025225253,0.0002380132,0.0007343544,0.00026383728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00342731,0.00067285186,0.00061415666,0.0033439747,0.0070696375,0.011100081,0.0016122352,0.003178151,0.004877766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00651182,0.0005194304,0.0005880985,0.0043252283,0.030961651,0.008772298,0.003925677,0.004027165,0.00055636535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011780858,0.0000015092164,0.000054400025,0.000020041185,0.0000015965317,0.000023768263,0.0009872589,0.00014357368,0.000011365094,0.99477166,0.0025113053,0.0014723392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047471603,0.0000079819965,0.00064733025,0.00042833312,0.000012977167,0.000082448925,0.0037852572,0.00051978446,0.000047026297,0.71865666,0.2757902,0.000017292983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26770675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2399096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26770675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03423875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023528628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.532297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020593912","doi":"","title":"Litigation privilege: transient or timeless? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Adversarial system; Governor; Blank","score_opus":0.027250831146428043,"score_gpt":0.3244106227569039,"score_spread":0.29715979161047584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020593912","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035321835,0.014531671,0.0017230045,0.64113075,0.0017929882,0.00009253956,0.00049842935,0.000105399966,0.30480343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6626257,0.004380421,0.0011369274,0.23189607,0.00083443243,0.00006339651,0.00011674678,0.00006767174,0.09887858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024117,0.00081634603,0.00032880696,0.0010106763,0.0032620118,0.004341057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937075,0.0022884505,0.00042722092,0.00020341421,0.001512665,0.0018607411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058545326,0.00028265614,0.000666899,0.0013540759,0.019865653,0.014283814,0.0030825124,0.013601789,0.0073989574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01829108,0.00050922326,0.00045491286,0.0015734709,0.015444444,0.00719498,0.0036438808,0.011676544,0.0005966264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040225794,0.000031052765,0.0047348416,0.0000964963,0.000014183433,0.0011783958,0.009830624,0.00008447169,0.00039981765,0.7811045,0.17836387,0.024121517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051004812,0.000052398325,0.018003983,0.00076393416,0.000053469463,0.0007687478,0.01753483,0.0005065161,0.0009213842,0.12372308,0.8374141,0.00020663788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91035146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97068214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089648545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056946415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097881846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41317707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020606427","doi":"","title":"Mere [in The McGill Companion to Law, Special Issue]","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Interpretation (philosophy); Feature (linguistics); Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.03657228997801501,"score_gpt":0.3048429299953126,"score_spread":0.2682706400172976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020606427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007626378,0.044424407,0.0022354748,0.19546413,0.19967802,0.00020151601,0.0020017629,0.000995765,0.5542363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051876153,0.006549238,0.0006332847,0.065833904,0.06619722,0.000229234,0.00042642583,0.0005257074,0.8544173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966078,0.00077293924,0.00021018495,0.0003544389,0.0016261293,0.0004286186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949969,0.0019539795,0.00023749,0.00041139056,0.0018493343,0.00055092265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036804092,0.0014254561,0.0019371593,0.004271655,0.010349732,0.013513843,0.0041930014,0.020799663,0.12087747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017541831,0.0013689558,0.001386637,0.0036544395,0.0035266713,0.0072212787,0.003613499,0.011011556,0.051570572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039395113,0.000008567639,0.000033414228,0.000020952988,0.0000017995727,0.000012853984,0.000029539911,0.000011513789,0.000020125324,0.0047972617,0.9906431,0.0044169337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005139404,0.000007575551,0.00051162246,0.00011310982,0.000007165804,0.000024016117,0.000079657875,0.00008247417,0.000031576514,0.004079574,0.9950411,0.000017012366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11835959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3359997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12087747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009701767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010836788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40437543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7022530492","doi":"","title":"Chevron Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Deference; Agency (philosophy); Statute; Statutory law; Normative; Doctrine","score_opus":0.028880883348728258,"score_gpt":0.30944697148168826,"score_spread":0.28056608813296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7022530492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122133754,0.0047145924,0.002629023,0.009910367,0.00056184665,0.000090103604,0.00026930205,0.0001622134,0.85952884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75487757,0.0021095383,0.0015214103,0.0072516315,0.000115185,0.00008865988,0.00022156084,0.0001907218,0.23362368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442637,0.0025451882,0.00016868654,0.0010571039,0.0009386788,0.00086405355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925667,0.0031508568,0.0010606011,0.0011848618,0.0016188546,0.00041800924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030049316,0.00024306387,0.00033254275,0.0015015253,0.0051198266,0.0075210095,0.00088015496,0.0020239633,0.040198773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012604506,0.0002162183,0.00044904015,0.002288341,0.0027749399,0.0026542041,0.00322736,0.0025112843,0.0046071135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000145612,0.000085011874,0.009748891,0.00032797587,0.000053939628,0.0011110952,0.033893615,0.0005426796,0.0016419108,0.7160904,0.07959963,0.15675926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022470267,0.00007392633,0.0134527115,0.0003663367,0.000036108755,0.0005497409,0.012699377,0.0003679547,0.0012823679,0.010551292,0.96056515,0.000032617558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017746162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02622047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040198773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035155804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003198084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13447827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025017645","doi":"","title":"Some Confusion about Discretion in the New British Columbia Wills, Estates and Succession Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Confusion; Discretion; Action (physics); Succession planning","score_opus":0.009774593605839885,"score_gpt":0.2679978556771017,"score_spread":0.25822326207126184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025017645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061198287,0.006440011,0.0056868703,0.473699,0.0023101275,0.0000887801,0.0005014273,0.00008459984,0.4499908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.709901,0.00248341,0.0026599865,0.13983126,0.0014927008,0.00016234425,0.00014144073,0.00016804242,0.1431598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778528,0.006265608,0.0011152235,0.0025189046,0.006581021,0.0056664976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97204065,0.0188599,0.00080134626,0.0012800838,0.0050968626,0.001921089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020395854,0.000538346,0.0011715841,0.0021577557,0.03244411,0.027042165,0.005209116,0.029408835,0.006775801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037735485,0.0017676422,0.00076730666,0.003410694,0.035312932,0.00927816,0.0044778273,0.03953025,0.0010252319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027246631,0.00002265731,0.00059667515,0.000025159898,0.000009635253,0.00009348829,0.01034459,0.00034894134,0.00009785368,0.92438275,0.05931556,0.004735385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008265581,0.000035092326,0.008209413,0.00078250986,0.00009585655,0.000115913346,0.02027818,0.002136103,0.00085602066,0.41642573,0.5506024,0.00038016017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91093636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.953903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089063644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07032409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07983929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51023936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025156857","doi":"","title":"Undue influence: Towards a unifying concept of unconscionability?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Commonwealth; Parliament; Legislature; Function (biology); Normative; English law","score_opus":0.016533442201894004,"score_gpt":0.27914767181072614,"score_spread":0.26261422960883213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025156857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051910393,0.009886759,0.1423143,0.06138923,0.0012708622,0.00018736022,0.000058932852,0.000090560105,0.7328916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97979194,0.0017925645,0.0051592244,0.0043006972,0.00078794843,0.00016368365,0.000017398537,0.000052885396,0.007933752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98198247,0.0074195066,0.0008699952,0.0019105499,0.00566773,0.002149634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818833,0.011918628,0.0017716237,0.0019848188,0.0016445244,0.00079707097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012580239,0.0006787563,0.0012945363,0.0036026393,0.0063554924,0.016097277,0.0047103167,0.011987895,0.0036787307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030978093,0.00055222993,0.0009529609,0.0025161013,0.09246045,0.021915823,0.011649606,0.010325993,0.00056826166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020658863,0.0000034398572,0.00013484209,0.0000067674596,0.0000019778054,0.00005175416,0.0011318121,0.0000670795,0.000019006346,0.997017,0.00016206084,0.0014022209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007639436,0.000019791205,0.00050570536,0.00013149512,0.000011653483,0.00016395388,0.0015871053,0.00063396065,0.00012388085,0.9785001,0.01829115,0.000023471326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005683786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042393645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016097277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006651558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059730355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06653148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027145257","doi":"","title":"Canadian Personal Property Security Law, 3rd ed","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Statutory law; Security interest; Personal account; Personally identifiable information","score_opus":0.02268995271509505,"score_gpt":0.2823208848430548,"score_spread":0.25963093212795973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027145257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066390506,0.07641356,0.0014673381,0.0122434655,0.0026158316,0.00009015066,0.0029260032,0.0003310135,0.9032486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0123335915,0.03847906,0.0013872094,0.0050355876,0.0004160166,0.00008025919,0.0011245048,0.00015617014,0.9409876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754333,0.00009712926,0.000068522415,0.00020286092,0.001781105,0.0003071164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914646,0.000082507155,0.000029517138,0.00006642242,0.00059339387,0.00008161952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009171526,0.0013808366,0.0006256364,0.0033889138,0.007933001,0.008346573,0.001983671,0.0045909625,0.054751758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027491956,0.00093439926,0.0007601691,0.004617471,0.0034300948,0.0034498035,0.001704083,0.0035970379,0.019055013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042276956,0.0000062423874,0.00015031878,0.00007686287,0.0000020990315,0.00007637855,0.00059205934,0.00016116443,0.00008752711,0.11875132,0.8486989,0.031392857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.145213e-7,0.0000012232794,0.0002357528,0.00008994539,0.0000014656076,0.000024531777,0.000121975776,0.000034303026,0.000024011562,0.003091189,0.9963696,0.0000050459143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92189336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.970251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07810664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046341438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069040865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3362322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027322764","doi":"","title":"1967 Chap. 0807. An Act Authorizing The County Commissioners Of Norfolk County To Acquire Land And To Borrow Money For The Purpose Of Providing Parking Facilities For The Norfolk County Registry Of Deeds.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"County government; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Borough; Quarter (Canadian coin); Pie chart; Legislation","score_opus":0.014501409077039345,"score_gpt":0.25687945120625005,"score_spread":0.2423780421292107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027322764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088065345,0.007713908,0.00026081444,0.01063142,0.0012133468,0.000058817408,0.0037498798,0.00011202639,0.97537917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008353986,0.0022217983,0.00028493666,0.009571774,0.00038708627,0.0001251463,0.00063688133,0.00007422093,0.9783441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879825,0.0001974232,0.00009774452,0.00012749346,0.00047064185,0.000308352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985642,0.0003967224,0.000113826936,0.000079062556,0.0007456753,0.0001005494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110296,0.0009655802,0.0003797301,0.001541835,0.006648742,0.0035833048,0.0010490603,0.0067740357,0.10785635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004436422,0.0008376745,0.00040153848,0.001979615,0.0014072935,0.002036363,0.0014678367,0.0046647307,0.07836897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019858964,0.000014311505,0.00023177452,0.000048244012,0.0000013484573,0.00006889447,0.00055551564,0.000025695736,0.000053205036,0.02632473,0.9634943,0.009162067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008112917,0.000006717908,0.0020792384,0.00024170498,0.000003477194,0.00006158597,0.0004737486,0.000015871587,0.000054517,0.002241927,0.9948042,0.0000089432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28524652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58993626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28524652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00461719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049316864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5671724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027903632","doi":"","title":"Economic Torts in Canada, 2nd ed.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Tort; Legislation; Liability","score_opus":0.011902411260249893,"score_gpt":0.25675253088833255,"score_spread":0.24485011962808267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027903632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022730192,0.42029205,0.0015516271,0.0486749,0.0030335565,0.00009285299,0.0058119,0.00031170968,0.5179584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05243025,0.28471145,0.002003507,0.013703063,0.0014836151,0.00012420006,0.003029805,0.00022903178,0.6422851],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984995,0.00006834116,0.00005066252,0.00008152048,0.00093317224,0.00036673425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989441,0.00011481885,0.000053752297,0.00003407316,0.00069053454,0.0001627297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008272703,0.0016299278,0.00072114065,0.004943009,0.0093474835,0.007086199,0.0019904266,0.004711202,0.039030638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025709243,0.0010160862,0.00087722245,0.00672526,0.004320243,0.0031360355,0.0014114085,0.0028901442,0.005866328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069006205,0.000018479104,0.0005217192,0.00012568379,0.000005719108,0.00013319567,0.00054997584,0.00040364865,0.000057159432,0.067579046,0.8946337,0.03596479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004035549,0.0000041030617,0.00397227,0.0004442961,0.000009027274,0.00012943405,0.0008114141,0.0001955022,0.00005878343,0.009506117,0.984844,0.000020941497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97831887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99239445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08744805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08744805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115725316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.634483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042151788","doi":"","title":"An Old Bottle for the New Wine: Understanding the Duty of Honest Performance under the Objective Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Equivocation; Section (typography); Base (topology)","score_opus":0.03432905189601945,"score_gpt":0.3114762500529988,"score_spread":0.2771471981569793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042151788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08956882,0.0051041297,0.04360441,0.06580946,0.0003815692,0.0000940297,0.00005711218,0.000023627783,0.79535687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756048,0.0014232735,0.0033863806,0.0035993902,0.00016378083,0.00005460936,0.000020381618,0.00002531654,0.015722089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913914,0.0044001117,0.00020352272,0.0005428655,0.0020546718,0.0014073099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671376,0.0017292236,0.0004069576,0.00026869314,0.00057764765,0.00030367926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009825466,0.0003374976,0.0003860134,0.0014857661,0.006571773,0.0108393645,0.0017581542,0.004433999,0.0019714227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005952265,0.00041098017,0.00040492573,0.00094030617,0.047042955,0.0116914455,0.0046088523,0.005866337,0.00033940724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018784132,0.0000027856672,0.00007208386,0.0000059591753,4.864533e-7,0.000026384749,0.004442343,0.000055546236,0.00002094885,0.994232,0.00023727915,0.0009022233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006650356,0.00001780364,0.00086817605,0.0001934458,0.0000052569076,0.00007872975,0.013429126,0.0013374761,0.00015418873,0.9467658,0.037118807,0.000024472818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08779493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065711446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08779493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021525552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014413936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17456782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043834974","doi":"","title":"Unjust Factors, Absence of Juristic Reason and the Development of Canadian Unjust(ified) Enrichment Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Perspective (graphical); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.024692620754561825,"score_gpt":0.27082046595484627,"score_spread":0.24612784520028444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043834974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06942781,0.002548833,0.008520355,0.06709326,0.00047344447,0.00020275838,0.00027311794,0.000100563724,0.85135984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92624265,0.0008080753,0.005452787,0.00835442,0.00008646449,0.00007873763,0.00008715078,0.000053971624,0.058835734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98732924,0.0013812036,0.00034036016,0.001273393,0.005097406,0.0045783194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865965,0.0029098946,0.00054105296,0.0010505655,0.006785244,0.0021167472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010015258,0.0004076349,0.0005728274,0.0037544006,0.022539709,0.010797008,0.0027769106,0.0058176946,0.00957695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027379956,0.00050301256,0.0007655494,0.0026424823,0.034101084,0.004166236,0.005610486,0.009962968,0.00028745638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004526754,0.000008827543,0.0005770932,0.000008591866,0.000002013119,0.000029363411,0.0014392843,0.00012604278,0.00003368629,0.9914465,0.0029681348,0.0033559266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004599988,0.00002874797,0.012295562,0.00029198235,0.000040602423,0.00016534117,0.004960231,0.0017298532,0.00069427927,0.6608715,0.31875876,0.00011712902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9516932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97628695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100265056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100265056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21601449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7274773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043898804","doi":"","title":"Walter Leishman McGregor","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Artillery; German; World War II; First world war; First law","score_opus":0.020276411185172302,"score_gpt":0.28993775341741207,"score_spread":0.26966134223223975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043898804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036768417,0.03625804,0.0009214617,0.15135391,0.038107462,0.00011720088,0.0008134709,0.00032786396,0.7684237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070890505,0.0057660867,0.00022153884,0.008885596,0.0012946022,0.000028221966,0.00009928544,0.00006869279,0.9765469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921167,0.00008464232,0.000019174213,0.00015986049,0.00033983315,0.00018481041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931765,0.000052152598,0.00004661733,0.00002966203,0.0001951362,0.00035881015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000632077,0.0006800169,0.0002603867,0.0011017958,0.00418059,0.0029860954,0.000694644,0.0016191585,0.12837516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027094807,0.00029238797,0.00021939121,0.00044952004,0.0009785314,0.0023456507,0.0024422957,0.0037756877,0.045024708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000957383,0.000011290156,0.00023794245,0.000020430347,0.0000010249688,0.00010273204,0.00022864052,0.000011588644,0.000092909766,0.008830329,0.95885116,0.031602375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.6386235e-7,0.0000029345892,0.00016454696,0.000030729385,3.309442e-7,0.00008958549,0.00010925238,0.0000041966637,0.000029119205,0.00032165062,0.99924517,0.0000018862632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0157505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03388356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12837516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028945315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041303476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42945766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043955713","doi":"","title":"Who then â in Law â is my Neighbour? Lord Atkinâs âNeighbour Principleâ as an Aid for the Principled Delineation of the Boundaries of Negligent Liability","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Duty; Tort; Res ipsa loquitur; Objectivity (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Function (biology); Duty of care; Strict liability","score_opus":0.010155480834248753,"score_gpt":0.22143760315070443,"score_spread":0.21128212231645568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043955713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018513964,0.027391609,0.015575039,0.18721578,0.0025063322,0.00006178408,0.00006611752,0.00008443457,0.7485849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6779456,0.010686446,0.008613493,0.026887164,0.0010974791,0.00007065475,0.000054924218,0.00011971043,0.27452457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995059,0.0022809762,0.00017854932,0.0007406362,0.0012625059,0.00047834482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977393,0.0012121253,0.00014347576,0.00018756735,0.00047668544,0.00024087616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003453484,0.00025473133,0.00043065893,0.0010578078,0.010746177,0.008210323,0.0008437427,0.0046537514,0.007191033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00693186,0.00024537137,0.00032921042,0.0009480607,0.021274526,0.010075989,0.0029086815,0.006265706,0.0020627112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007460313,0.000008151712,0.00017962026,0.000028919214,0.0000022103593,0.00011135478,0.00785203,0.000030626536,0.000103969614,0.96528584,0.017782304,0.008607539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006251565,0.000018501854,0.0005938647,0.00022037904,0.00000566641,0.00040028678,0.008978205,0.00016374353,0.00025120634,0.46549255,0.52384174,0.00002754755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034878373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047836505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034878373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008814924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074163475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06935072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7044149322","doi":"","title":"Whither Choice of Law? A Look at Canada and Australia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.02918733016275552,"score_gpt":0.2983375056976728,"score_spread":0.26915017553491727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7044149322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14928494,0.048561066,0.0010915806,0.27085236,0.00089862937,0.000094892814,0.0004223888,0.00003319438,0.5287609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83818245,0.017463088,0.0011669488,0.032561705,0.00024149191,0.00007463171,0.000089365916,0.00007032871,0.110149965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228996,0.001322778,0.00012318615,0.0004512557,0.002115558,0.0036974056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387264,0.0013939473,0.00032850992,0.00013658775,0.0022173862,0.0020509826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030703347,0.0004646263,0.0009988116,0.0047241277,0.038239606,0.015496181,0.0028210254,0.007337153,0.011123445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01029242,0.00061884406,0.00077626074,0.010254209,0.022077544,0.0059612496,0.0050200275,0.009451871,0.00040224876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004406307,0.00007209289,0.0057526985,0.00012643926,0.000029070854,0.00045546904,0.034049578,0.00062890246,0.000101081205,0.8846445,0.050543793,0.023552228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052078867,0.000057580615,0.04321886,0.0011486076,0.00008179837,0.00028392544,0.12278523,0.001280384,0.00017724562,0.12057755,0.71011573,0.00022097064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99840444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.184365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.184365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2323313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94602096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066750337","doi":"","title":"Inclusion (In)Action Within the Province of Alberta","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Declaration; Diversity (politics); Convention; Cover (algebra); Order (exchange); Action (physics); Human rights","score_opus":0.23361595170594893,"score_gpt":0.5767227454219558,"score_spread":0.34310679371600683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066750337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2558178,0.0067060627,0.0020571514,0.056976013,0.00088397827,0.00024544966,0.0006182485,0.00018514495,0.6765102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7370176,0.0028820047,0.002413333,0.0061981706,0.000072638584,0.00007335128,0.00030071914,0.000057968784,0.25098416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468464,0.0008622264,0.00007884,0.00038701188,0.0016751047,0.0023121694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359244,0.0012297635,0.00022621076,0.00025597028,0.0020739972,0.0026215555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034604722,0.00024336067,0.00033650064,0.0009974479,0.020024044,0.008471746,0.0021008314,0.0017126007,0.00912453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006533419,0.00028091876,0.00019937864,0.0023649458,0.006687889,0.0014283559,0.0063837003,0.0020118314,0.000693499],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002663972,0.00021645807,0.040287316,0.00061548536,0.000036378402,0.0031047363,0.1400332,0.0013366555,0.0022149922,0.3908738,0.18014173,0.24087293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001739729,0.00003917053,0.045225006,0.00050379656,0.000025819372,0.0002588398,0.120436,0.000457511,0.00084520405,0.010140354,0.82199496,0.000056109082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98522896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074055396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074055396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2799552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53731203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067007979","doi":"","title":"L'Administration des biens d'autrui dans le code civil du Québec","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.02753607660118061,"score_gpt":0.28166582439564064,"score_spread":0.25412974779446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067007979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13419235,0.018432686,0.013333039,0.10165495,0.0030734946,0.0005208358,0.0018116066,0.0006293934,0.7263517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28585714,0.002894696,0.0046598488,0.0063874945,0.00034606605,0.00021448123,0.00024317368,0.0001375656,0.69925946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358916,0.0012892138,0.00023611142,0.00061547157,0.0024058444,0.0018642192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941924,0.0018427243,0.00032041597,0.000373722,0.0023372725,0.0009333967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004193089,0.00070144073,0.0006772988,0.0019551662,0.014863398,0.01020547,0.0015473687,0.0064923004,0.01750092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009345581,0.0007465396,0.0007742285,0.0019195235,0.005094018,0.0017104622,0.0019236534,0.00693016,0.0015834324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073320116,0.00009998961,0.0069142054,0.00016205803,0.000036978377,0.00057078,0.009697187,0.0018621136,0.001332164,0.80641997,0.11315844,0.05967291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003519996,0.000051127994,0.022249034,0.0002981389,0.000026454394,0.00011955534,0.0026371689,0.0012582877,0.00079042546,0.009609643,0.9628492,0.000075622615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97037315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9709792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06610027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06610027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12756586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47959328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067674630","doi":"","title":"Map of Capisallo City, Hidalgo County, Texas [Mercedes, Texas]","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mile; Subdivision; Center pivot irrigation; Center (category theory); Intersection (aeronautics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.029337261654168563,"score_gpt":0.2685165323833572,"score_spread":0.23917927072918865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067674630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007178305,0.001410075,0.00087347464,0.0025357904,0.0009956424,0.00042020145,0.16995667,0.00093662343,0.81569326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06385729,0.0036699225,0.003709355,0.0010795553,0.0003277408,0.0010213439,0.14560993,0.00040276317,0.78032213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983144,0.00001854362,0.0000052663513,0.000033155648,0.000054184526,0.0000573404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996575,0.000010916356,0.000018755705,0.000010215707,0.0002528618,0.000049728278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010499366,0.00069157314,0.00020216085,0.001501351,0.0021529181,0.0017738914,0.00074110104,0.00039919274,0.2793068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048483035,0.00023927588,0.000154743,0.0034481892,0.0003774452,0.0007181851,0.0008660713,0.00069404877,0.06874738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016096585,0.000010699195,0.0009000119,0.00008956985,0.0000020387702,0.00005323347,0.00027783072,0.00011447846,0.00007548445,0.0014819865,0.9865915,0.010387105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012806959,0.000010316041,0.0135729,0.00012698882,0.000005192091,0.000059523285,0.0021937096,0.00008788962,0.000053430056,0.00022965533,0.9836379,0.00000971423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2189787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40210602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2793068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017719615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047994973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93437433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070356180","doi":"","title":"Personal Property Security in Australia-A Long, Long Trail A-Winding","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Security interest; Property law; National security; Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.046526334373289555,"score_gpt":0.3216374382299538,"score_spread":0.2751111038566642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070356180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3539685,0.0077375574,0.0023759578,0.11641286,0.0005733495,0.00009301975,0.000054146334,0.000047274276,0.51873726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8371466,0.0022371656,0.0015476145,0.015363673,0.0001205769,0.00005777007,0.000018266719,0.00001946148,0.14348885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978204,0.0005602827,0.000094272276,0.0002468004,0.00077994564,0.00049829145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889344,0.00016405228,0.00013365166,0.00008284923,0.00028087097,0.00044518482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014177401,0.00012843452,0.00014254068,0.00049910834,0.007714886,0.0046942066,0.00046292692,0.0032418778,0.0043870537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028084232,0.0003638368,0.00016640428,0.00045765477,0.006974147,0.0033176753,0.0052118124,0.0042385007,0.00046170445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023027576,0.00008661176,0.007040471,0.00009790589,0.00001026996,0.0018581223,0.04082197,0.0003595073,0.002194871,0.8588746,0.04642456,0.04220801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002487118,0.00019332979,0.04896048,0.00039945942,0.000019305002,0.0014505668,0.01922071,0.0014154464,0.0006091197,0.09840473,0.829219,0.000082966806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108737916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22300413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108737916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073359893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011563953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21621001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070617147","doi":"","title":"Points saillants de l'exercice 2002","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Work (physics); Point (geometry); Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.010058730905100219,"score_gpt":0.22057538165545607,"score_spread":0.21051665075035586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070617147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054215514,0.006511845,0.0012244985,0.04779634,0.0057038385,0.00023994081,0.004358976,0.00051241886,0.9282306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013043095,0.0013318948,0.00040972498,0.0035241821,0.00041132234,0.00008604814,0.00060745305,0.000084523235,0.98050183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521047,0.0003745563,0.00017251342,0.00031903633,0.0029942878,0.0009291134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996779,0.0005690283,0.00009866365,0.00015637088,0.0018533394,0.0005436825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029138722,0.00062030467,0.0005077878,0.0015910758,0.005552994,0.008431714,0.00137557,0.005808292,0.10282336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008197961,0.0005047264,0.0004965977,0.0017344169,0.001245995,0.0019667663,0.0021767956,0.006350589,0.024138732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006803594,0.000049876988,0.00061339745,0.00007701781,0.0000046299524,0.00023129978,0.0007623701,0.000070345406,0.00025913736,0.043598827,0.9199884,0.034276713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007689618,0.000008064215,0.0025097725,0.00007345946,0.0000020991354,0.000033516317,0.00029034086,0.000039811668,0.00015192105,0.00070251833,0.9961708,0.000009949358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5157285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69636166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5157285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008732187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017055115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.974247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071078709","doi":"","title":"(Review) Bank and Customer Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Payment; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.014359960372853406,"score_gpt":0.21816379117883264,"score_spread":0.20380383080597925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071078709","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031930473,0.92670166,0.00013703167,0.049125727,0.0054440186,0.000054520326,0.00088043016,0.000037251502,0.017300047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006951243,0.9465618,0.00037179657,0.029314516,0.0022932114,0.00007733549,0.0005211201,0.0000180641,0.013890883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529475,0.0004092649,0.00040395593,0.00024821772,0.0030568654,0.00058694696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97824234,0.004677664,0.002004746,0.00033598466,0.012601312,0.0021379646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041332045,0.00093875936,0.0018485016,0.00864851,0.0042180265,0.009017654,0.002836457,0.0065630395,0.014941596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019442117,0.0006736722,0.0011634812,0.018896552,0.0044424646,0.002101462,0.001668895,0.005070666,0.0025457335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030184292,0.000015691096,0.0005067213,0.005734236,0.00009574616,0.00006694589,0.000115593284,0.00013058423,0.000036690148,0.004847358,0.8952434,0.09317682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005134893,0.000015413318,0.004973068,0.01593112,0.0002546769,0.000082681414,0.00021580329,0.000060017173,0.000042676173,0.0010331894,0.9773073,0.00003264132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9164933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9736647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0835067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053808745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2759437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39041162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071240755","doi":"","title":"Statement of facts relative to an adjustment of a difficulty...between I.H. Smith, of New York, and J.B Smith, of Montreal, Canada.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Mistake; Criticism; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.016169557235486885,"score_gpt":0.22413179776726622,"score_spread":0.20796224053177934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071240755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018513735,0.003983264,0.15080133,0.24773367,0.040824756,0.00072198233,0.0037070608,0.0011211197,0.53259313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46515906,0.0046626735,0.094482996,0.026628084,0.018512141,0.0009460829,0.0039123534,0.0010453658,0.38465124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941551,0.0017840329,0.0010440189,0.0011383991,0.0013577639,0.0005206973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794133,0.011041692,0.0016213536,0.0021922835,0.0049801567,0.0007511423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064506964,0.00064859015,0.0005785986,0.0014136113,0.0036909375,0.0045380634,0.0018960356,0.0040809377,0.043434493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051098008,0.0005766626,0.0009819368,0.00094887486,0.0041810386,0.007934217,0.0035562906,0.0072400947,0.010739979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025789093,0.00005375352,0.0011104114,0.0001679563,0.000034808174,0.0008631439,0.0046448624,0.000425124,0.0016439669,0.73035324,0.210486,0.049958862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004536156,0.000069243884,0.0025085495,0.00026552906,0.00005059299,0.0005712305,0.0038030294,0.0012798342,0.0020624504,0.29760027,0.6916549,0.00008901322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073971897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077030826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002253337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037074643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14530289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072074807","doi":"","title":"Thresholds of Actionable Mental Harm in Negligence:\\nA Policy-Based Appraisal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Plaintiff; Damages; Compensation (psychology); Limiting; Mental illness; Legitimacy; Relevance (law)","score_opus":0.022956467297498836,"score_gpt":0.3296036188501974,"score_spread":0.30664715155269856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072074807","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031919736,0.094695106,0.039761033,0.5486738,0.005342575,0.00046628725,0.00036772524,0.00019014651,0.27858362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8578036,0.06062978,0.018884407,0.046767406,0.00475987,0.00057024194,0.00017543904,0.00006150619,0.01034779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.968158,0.011933522,0.002589797,0.0015627465,0.013355635,0.002400279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9487163,0.036511164,0.0032667434,0.0013645776,0.009140112,0.0010011699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024090659,0.00086430553,0.0013582485,0.007850008,0.0035873672,0.018376878,0.004821734,0.012486259,0.0044918293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05198354,0.00066739495,0.001077226,0.003116445,0.028226664,0.016793717,0.005315058,0.008481389,0.0006297037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005015689,0.000066176035,0.0013912448,0.0007726658,0.000022427463,0.00012308137,0.00080562313,0.0029823242,0.00020245618,0.9558249,0.008409205,0.029349728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032854718,0.00015788275,0.004660914,0.003678724,0.00009091545,0.0002564712,0.006298232,0.0054056775,0.0007933292,0.8949204,0.08360424,0.00010036864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018857446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021142026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027415587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027415587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030221105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19891495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095096873","doi":"","title":"166 International Journal of Circumpolar Health 70:2 2011 Obesity risks among Inuit ORIGINAL ARTICLE Obesity risks: towards an emerging Inuit pattern","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waist; Anthropometry; Obesity; Circumpolar star; Body mass index; Quartile; Metabolic syndrome","score_opus":0.05829333493134414,"score_gpt":0.3892522800892196,"score_spread":0.33095894515787544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095096873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99598795,0.000746848,0.00012370362,0.0005581305,0.00001739876,0.000008406568,0.000110719295,0.000002645118,0.0024441984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838364,0.000567037,0.00018018422,0.00014527555,0.000026178557,0.000005929654,0.000115176874,0.0000029499422,0.0005735137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984455,0.000038500555,0.000010539487,0.000037600727,0.000031873304,0.000037027494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996455,0.000037803562,0.00016574521,0.000018325467,0.00005974075,0.00007298337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043140384,0.00016387342,0.00017850501,0.0007466876,0.00093342544,0.0012339466,0.00030361736,0.00023417042,0.0034761555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009096742,0.00019297696,0.000114409166,0.0012649954,0.00047666513,0.00045817925,0.0006109227,0.00047281972,0.00016399019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025323847,0.0000332313,0.9877203,0.000038522998,0.000024337196,0.00015770196,0.004509382,0.000016792994,0.00055403775,0.00040089875,0.0004432053,0.006076231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018265831,0.00002876543,0.99472755,0.00004924821,0.000016849986,0.00026412768,0.0038309984,0.000105404666,0.000054344673,0.00008617725,0.0008304907,0.0000041570993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08280294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15027532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08280294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004027635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064950873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16464198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096127961","doi":"","title":"THESIS (OTHER THAN BRIEF EXCERPTS REQUIRING ONLY PROPER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IN SCHOLARLY WRITING) AND THAT ALL SUCH USE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Permission; Work (physics); Confidentiality; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.11132308240996933,"score_gpt":0.3383433589000355,"score_spread":0.22702027649006615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096127961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004389008,0.0022936524,0.0071548386,0.01624006,0.022615038,0.0010224964,0.0069026668,0.0017374431,0.9376448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013683144,0.0031523001,0.0022890044,0.002322519,0.0038147708,0.00071956485,0.0034359372,0.0009725911,0.9696102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939656,0.000097222146,0.00003704385,0.000058570447,0.00035730316,0.000053275016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956391,0.0013102894,0.00022652111,0.00045046868,0.0016337963,0.00073980674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097393664,0.0006412581,0.00071401783,0.0015782989,0.0017788656,0.004396329,0.00068372453,0.0005802114,0.3981141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010013415,0.00021889519,0.00045466595,0.0021284553,0.0010392412,0.0014350571,0.0018029038,0.0022230695,0.3436467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025908472,0.000055808483,0.00010550649,0.00029538767,0.0000033119193,0.00006263734,0.00055937486,0.000047862388,0.0010817592,0.0050592576,0.94671714,0.04598609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008290165,0.00004653748,0.0007618017,0.0001527584,0.0000026516243,0.0001382336,0.00043408762,0.00006264818,0.00040010072,0.001654225,0.99633104,0.0000075560374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005479604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011160988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6018859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010330082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014500328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85851717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096714068","doi":"","title":"Dissertation Repository. Paper 1698. EVALUATION OF ONTARIO’S STREET RACERS, STUNT AND AGGRESSIVE DRIVERS LEGISLATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Inclusion (mineral); Government (linguistics); Confidentiality; Work (physics); Electronic surveillance","score_opus":0.02144983035866106,"score_gpt":0.31970207200741546,"score_spread":0.2982522416487544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096714068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36942816,0.0019864582,0.00044110854,0.02465118,0.00078180525,0.0038632678,0.045815136,0.00019649495,0.5528364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66681343,0.0036420159,0.0022792132,0.0038228505,0.0001916411,0.0035314295,0.023044055,0.00018210817,0.29649326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948072,0.00071049324,0.00016938237,0.00025487927,0.0036895338,0.0003685769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973155,0.0038859951,0.0016782184,0.0012598707,0.016251903,0.0037689558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007236952,0.00025286424,0.0006572815,0.0012566145,0.0057692598,0.0045043393,0.001129961,0.0012571956,0.06088078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033799533,0.00032819607,0.00040779778,0.0024486072,0.0013270627,0.00095038,0.0012594423,0.0015677409,0.009393486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011228236,0.0020355969,0.11559933,0.0007344016,0.00013396301,0.0000928588,0.013708524,0.00042491744,0.0006577197,0.0064748754,0.6703069,0.18870811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005222207,0.0010104602,0.64499307,0.0014188993,0.0002620053,0.000036200774,0.027745001,0.0005364369,0.00072492607,0.0010551828,0.32162443,0.000071086644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85767704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9280292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14232296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035201512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07550345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28632224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097297381","doi":"","title":"Dear Mr. Salvin:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Control (management); Subject (documents); Information governance","score_opus":0.10717792503863512,"score_gpt":0.3266939642630855,"score_spread":0.2195160392244504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097297381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038361724,0.009865715,0.0016653509,0.8106237,0.093785055,0.00017555716,0.0011203366,0.0010937857,0.07783437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02241111,0.0074634715,0.0013492758,0.14465967,0.0088163,0.00019888234,0.00047230884,0.0006000672,0.81402886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943715,0.00011566262,0.000028644537,0.00012831802,0.00020301918,0.00008723839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641705,0.00042774528,0.00022328673,0.000093642375,0.001984809,0.0008533895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001098427,0.00046635413,0.00048780878,0.00061602145,0.001980381,0.0014936797,0.0007319465,0.002309515,0.19494994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015501012,0.00020802903,0.00018996559,0.00038782944,0.0006530997,0.0014520606,0.0012212093,0.0041164826,0.110046685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012516287,0.000004800493,0.00021194419,0.000021926688,7.782534e-7,0.000051244882,0.00008408845,0.000003007446,0.000060312857,0.00015346768,0.99166745,0.007728521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000517333,0.000015298367,0.0010633741,0.00012635076,0.000003422253,0.00043805028,0.0010660298,0.00003554556,0.00027194154,0.00024510955,0.99671847,0.000011163774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007053345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015567519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8050501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080030353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013732375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6521725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097549411","doi":"","title":"AND REGISTRATION EXEMPTIONS Supplement to the OSC Bulletin","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Subpoena; Work (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.02474056876778684,"score_gpt":0.33061279760585016,"score_spread":0.3058722288380633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097549411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023829695,0.0013535196,0.0010495,0.020468274,0.007784249,0.0011010271,0.018631713,0.0011000364,0.9461287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006138292,0.00091715803,0.0008868769,0.008774541,0.0026639542,0.00047519134,0.0074309716,0.00032215516,0.9723909],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419856,0.0003555587,0.00040843379,0.00035356235,0.0039252234,0.00075875304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98973364,0.0017238779,0.00046810345,0.0013001236,0.0059596193,0.0008147496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035933687,0.00087026175,0.00074639166,0.003637699,0.0037741994,0.005753715,0.0019056738,0.00698097,0.14536028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014802526,0.00088073674,0.000847181,0.0027326285,0.0013429443,0.0023303716,0.002616262,0.004975452,0.15660161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003505576,0.000053641685,0.00018422536,0.00007629141,0.0000029334171,0.00007232556,0.00009583269,0.000046640092,0.00036080257,0.013084819,0.97319305,0.012794368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013943298,0.000012344987,0.0013232902,0.000045399494,0.0000036159558,0.000021167967,0.000037761645,0.000029423867,0.00012472729,0.00081417774,0.9975654,0.000008790339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119247116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17099628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14536028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005532806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01711202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4862786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097610440","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Remuneration; Compensation (psychology); Constitution; Payment; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.030693818916177396,"score_gpt":0.3418624410977331,"score_spread":0.3111686221815557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097610440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001554231,0.0006953368,0.0014182003,0.007699206,0.0013368067,0.00077973126,0.010592747,0.00027094898,0.9756529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014566453,0.0015248378,0.0034505154,0.009568856,0.00054482115,0.0013754332,0.012314192,0.00022041531,0.95643455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99052924,0.001028955,0.00068949064,0.0011916903,0.004865928,0.0016947021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914249,0.001013862,0.0002667779,0.00092581724,0.0057870727,0.0005816306],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053441757,0.0007021098,0.0007716681,0.0024873447,0.0064536645,0.0070555927,0.002597353,0.00501595,0.09442603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01449099,0.0009298947,0.000715425,0.0021901128,0.0025231843,0.0020935694,0.0027744966,0.0048927367,0.06010022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004333807,0.00005246398,0.00047718704,0.00011521088,0.000009671128,0.00008900658,0.00097422313,0.00013593257,0.0005628303,0.37297392,0.60868233,0.015883952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073085166,0.00000551192,0.00061186374,0.000054000157,0.000004638134,0.000019519586,0.00008020037,0.000019451349,0.00006691713,0.0020887011,0.99703395,0.000007816034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18874769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23960994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90557396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013613586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035775207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37529814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097647938","doi":"","title":"WELFARE REFORM AND EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES OF WELFARE RECIPIENTS AND SINGLE-MOTHERS”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Permission; Welfare; Welfare reform","score_opus":0.05983867222430287,"score_gpt":0.30262339173348335,"score_spread":0.24278471950918049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097647938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99489033,0.00035459406,0.00002350265,0.0022056557,0.000030450734,0.000009215855,0.00034389846,0.000002005022,0.0021402896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976069,0.00014316915,0.00001359017,0.00011802824,0.000016943073,0.000009164769,0.0002475164,0.0000011567618,0.0018435505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884474,0.00032082797,0.000041309122,0.00007752451,0.000104137835,0.00061143073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740535,0.00025137325,0.001201809,0.00008633024,0.00022984191,0.00082529953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013913653,0.00013880584,0.00037714987,0.000657056,0.0011296796,0.0014426777,0.0005724644,0.0007196036,0.011611062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005335644,0.00012622675,0.00046403697,0.0007837774,0.00066137494,0.00085753005,0.0019239115,0.0010157548,0.0012498737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096000877,0.0013358447,0.956461,0.000066672976,0.00017243226,0.00028132304,0.003370512,0.0003602037,0.00025657122,0.0041401447,0.007680415,0.024914822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005237981,0.00029636465,0.98806286,0.00007827028,0.00005757111,0.00006287346,0.006896461,0.00034937882,0.00024454528,0.0006609704,0.0032270378,0.000011249512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023328183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04016423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023328183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012952011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017087596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04638481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097726869","doi":"","title":"External Examiner:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Acknowledgement; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.11948725566791689,"score_gpt":0.32385045620492525,"score_spread":0.20436320053700835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097726869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05901113,0.0036139358,0.0086790845,0.14547902,0.059471976,0.015865427,0.118292,0.006750626,0.58283687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08494299,0.001154606,0.002837936,0.02915608,0.0036780718,0.009188602,0.0090727,0.0016664028,0.85830265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954913,0.0007068793,0.00064396416,0.0012755917,0.0012863075,0.0005960627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9561437,0.0032091215,0.0015769065,0.0029727055,0.03271411,0.0033834993],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005951904,0.0007679339,0.0014917189,0.003218734,0.0032028835,0.004396757,0.0012746559,0.0035237384,0.46468908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0526701,0.00068567524,0.00042524564,0.0019246752,0.001036693,0.002687758,0.0033059572,0.003131885,0.29146135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010396842,0.00004265293,0.00062466477,0.0002870181,0.0000029931725,0.0003179929,0.0010214436,0.000013146381,0.0003458136,0.0009812162,0.9809975,0.015261542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010147357,0.000070757524,0.008105341,0.0009730918,0.000008453949,0.0005783736,0.004477493,0.0001518489,0.0010016839,0.00102854,0.9834651,0.00003782443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004750398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006655255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5353109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002736786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071523893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76355606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097802619","doi":"","title":"The Parties and the Nature of the Claim","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Cause of action; Action (physics); Supreme court; Statute; Equity (law); Discretion; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.010973273148248523,"score_gpt":0.3100184362073328,"score_spread":0.2990451630590843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097802619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015776945,0.0021459705,0.0063287118,0.07358755,0.0021506941,0.0003625,0.000382604,0.00004599796,0.8992191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5030675,0.0019193925,0.0030228652,0.021921044,0.0031464947,0.00068870536,0.00022011714,0.0000959037,0.46591794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99051356,0.0025940612,0.00056371506,0.0019199617,0.0023064888,0.0021021618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942631,0.0032619426,0.000369435,0.00083466514,0.0007376023,0.0005332221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069524907,0.0004696182,0.0009456636,0.0013892627,0.0069002723,0.013557054,0.0023950406,0.02978048,0.04444026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02052931,0.00073183316,0.0011238015,0.0011422395,0.0075499592,0.0069553894,0.00562971,0.014780546,0.010914587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005040126,0.00005058695,0.00044747876,0.000026602693,0.000016522146,0.0005510225,0.0012529438,0.00008717515,0.00027951866,0.9726484,0.019800894,0.0047885603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009355006,0.000028921038,0.0010227904,0.00032486487,0.000039980136,0.0005624696,0.0026609844,0.0014822168,0.0006555873,0.6737992,0.31926274,0.00006669177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006024552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004171494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04444026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046744426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005861756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14866751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098149397","doi":"","title":"External Examiner:","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Acknowledgement; Control (management)","score_opus":0.050407675913244715,"score_gpt":0.35790603204856897,"score_spread":0.3074983561353243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098149397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043613553,0.0031239593,0.006400996,0.14878641,0.0650976,0.012029143,0.10931204,0.0058543044,0.605782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07186419,0.001079647,0.0021823593,0.028514614,0.0036359115,0.00745069,0.008188173,0.001671545,0.8754129],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947153,0.0007337385,0.00073089043,0.001433999,0.001697698,0.00068834354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9445231,0.003653193,0.001985486,0.003261744,0.04284108,0.00373537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060148514,0.00078607554,0.001432832,0.003510963,0.003756495,0.005337929,0.0014301103,0.0037803126,0.4564621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06191843,0.00071189663,0.00043213667,0.0022921544,0.0011221018,0.0030277572,0.0034440495,0.0033618913,0.30212617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007039074,0.000027202308,0.0005163487,0.00022455564,0.0000023434843,0.00022830101,0.0009158088,0.000010559028,0.00025246193,0.0009671784,0.9851908,0.011593933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064328655,0.000048539157,0.0062369276,0.0008809526,0.0000064285205,0.00040930693,0.004119703,0.000107477164,0.0007692116,0.0007965893,0.9865305,0.00003016487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062845694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007554245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5435379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003422003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008389529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77529085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098685629","doi":"","title":"External Examiner: Dr. External Examiner","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Acknowledgement; Work (physics); Control (management)","score_opus":0.026864499436433324,"score_gpt":0.32553545031340236,"score_spread":0.29867095087696904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098685629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029641243,0.016408257,0.010635522,0.6047431,0.16447043,0.009619433,0.03816823,0.005826651,0.120487146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15748666,0.010203114,0.009797137,0.26860744,0.035338406,0.02098979,0.007985299,0.003484556,0.48610765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947748,0.0010999487,0.0010034122,0.0012537835,0.0014297398,0.0004383161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9167511,0.0074356887,0.0032365886,0.003078284,0.06539089,0.0041073915],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008042781,0.0010528619,0.0023135275,0.004190788,0.0027773806,0.00341975,0.0015492057,0.0042646164,0.17015949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09744803,0.000834914,0.00053660874,0.0028868306,0.0012537385,0.0027002927,0.0026902515,0.005342164,0.09046617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007941612,0.00002211789,0.0004168404,0.00032686678,0.000004434797,0.0004273887,0.00062296307,0.000018657807,0.00023610222,0.0003408059,0.9844854,0.01301901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015496857,0.00010371437,0.008857314,0.0024406142,0.000028178736,0.0021948575,0.0051470343,0.00039723935,0.00096476247,0.0015364051,0.9780872,0.00008769405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005331985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005370288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82984054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030703114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056315097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5692402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099530935","doi":"","title":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); MEDLINE; Public health","score_opus":0.035975801519866735,"score_gpt":0.30743867368293526,"score_spread":0.2714628721630685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099530935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01327352,0.06610029,0.0024966574,0.3198084,0.05754543,0.0004152323,0.004920814,0.0003612924,0.53507835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029917741,0.019178636,0.0017078458,0.006473758,0.0027567614,0.00011914666,0.001401588,0.00011763925,0.938327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639857,0.00034384578,0.00012769189,0.00020394876,0.0021588975,0.0007669892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855096,0.0010581785,0.0002479393,0.00038753133,0.007119755,0.002635596],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061754673,0.0008212403,0.0014526616,0.002024414,0.011039435,0.012215679,0.0015124276,0.0052457694,0.07986037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009525176,0.00062726246,0.0007908541,0.0025254965,0.0039801863,0.0020864012,0.0024739983,0.0046045254,0.014004951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007348729,0.00006342406,0.00167905,0.00009990088,0.00002158889,0.000066432294,0.00047093807,0.00013743211,0.00013540973,0.010714769,0.9625277,0.024009842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010877916,0.000006966688,0.0027597337,0.00012777708,0.00001099993,0.000014732003,0.00081751053,0.000118115895,0.000066544184,0.0010164022,0.9950342,0.000016126392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91627127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96632475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9201396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046354465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15381274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33632678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100151405","doi":"","title":"External Examiner:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Acknowledgement; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.11948725566791689,"score_gpt":0.32385045620492525,"score_spread":0.20436320053700835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100151405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06091603,0.003969952,0.008927513,0.16416968,0.06881822,0.016999148,0.12312778,0.0067664,0.54630524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09199852,0.0013191338,0.0031176007,0.033345602,0.004149137,0.011248001,0.009328941,0.0019249127,0.8435681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467343,0.00084425276,0.00076929823,0.0014885201,0.0015512725,0.00067325204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465582,0.003865903,0.0018273322,0.0031996826,0.040818807,0.0037301795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006731621,0.00079441845,0.001619521,0.0035365198,0.0035371447,0.0050200447,0.0013067002,0.0036542676,0.44298276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062191475,0.0007624759,0.00044493756,0.00221934,0.0011505187,0.002910902,0.0034363302,0.0034610808,0.2820548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009682298,0.000039815353,0.0006097326,0.00030847438,0.000002972244,0.0002780892,0.0013540467,0.000012953276,0.0003343333,0.0010160247,0.98144054,0.01450616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009570262,0.000067335975,0.007849014,0.0011049572,0.000008544129,0.0005072958,0.005598743,0.00014269089,0.0009457269,0.0009788935,0.9826617,0.00003940985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005172006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00680254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5570172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030385111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078303935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79451746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100178990","doi":"","title":"Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture On the Ownership of Funds in Transit in the Payment and Settlement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Payment; Transit (satellite); Government (linguistics); Human settlement","score_opus":0.07478407001324622,"score_gpt":0.33348539148499684,"score_spread":0.2587013214717506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100178990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023594119,0.005864438,0.00024121098,0.025503129,0.0010382188,0.000028955299,0.0011210273,0.000030458601,0.94257843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47994623,0.013326543,0.0010767735,0.00628216,0.0004541499,0.000048675054,0.0005658958,0.000072916,0.49822664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862826,0.00017491503,0.00008567351,0.00014422186,0.00048596592,0.0004809964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731016,0.0007161285,0.00016143014,0.00017623934,0.0013737746,0.0002622555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013202041,0.0003065162,0.00037761507,0.0019686017,0.009692875,0.010148642,0.00079194113,0.001756646,0.08648098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043736612,0.00029351917,0.00025906635,0.004879547,0.008784003,0.0019523295,0.0019196294,0.0016314603,0.004074116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004343715,0.000036050107,0.0076583074,0.00018086236,0.000015788813,0.00034342663,0.0129981255,0.00028605695,0.00026732247,0.63747007,0.29112512,0.04957548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009512265,0.00000644851,0.023831781,0.00035684792,0.000021174845,0.000092284485,0.010945006,0.00012730403,0.00013441675,0.017709656,0.94672924,0.000036281122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.960902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96586335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08648098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0336122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057803065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28930765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100397813","doi":"","title":"Paper presented at the Association for Canadian Studies in the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic interdependence; Democracy; Politics; Capital (architecture); Association (psychology); Economic integration; Free trade","score_opus":0.07865786475912981,"score_gpt":0.37424100263268567,"score_spread":0.29558313787355583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100397813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006064606,0.037070896,0.00037396018,0.09477911,0.02280122,0.00024817715,0.069913216,0.00020436487,0.7685444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04766422,0.026571097,0.0006267695,0.007467926,0.0021555203,0.00030514103,0.014716287,0.00019499398,0.90029806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985056,0.00025400938,0.000083336316,0.00018295679,0.0005791871,0.0003949832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941579,0.0007414715,0.00014241505,0.00044741106,0.0035381182,0.0009727238],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017090238,0.000690177,0.0012092193,0.004966056,0.009062935,0.0061321957,0.0013857584,0.0024287642,0.353351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064622555,0.00041508026,0.0005118162,0.009545193,0.0013459842,0.0024680358,0.0024900744,0.0021712624,0.038465995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020570393,0.000024779618,0.0017263028,0.00010237168,0.00000842364,0.000051411793,0.0004959047,0.00002674557,0.000019092735,0.007709916,0.97286046,0.016954036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006747878,0.0000034210316,0.013221645,0.00032031108,0.000005639139,0.000019377954,0.0015167495,0.00003173724,0.000014406901,0.0007358974,0.98411167,0.000012486327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85628474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9057989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85628474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02430984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037613295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9223663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100446067","doi":"","title":"B. Contract Payments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Closing (real estate)","score_opus":0.0245684150025861,"score_gpt":0.3214493475446296,"score_spread":0.2968809325420435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100446067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00097352173,0.00032951785,0.0034480472,0.012693249,0.0033679516,0.0009508794,0.0024104996,0.0011310991,0.9746952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017000552,0.0005377122,0.0049821436,0.01271961,0.0017051481,0.0012556689,0.0022374173,0.0008094892,0.9587523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744436,0.004588044,0.0014656106,0.001969195,0.013999332,0.003534143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595272,0.00794763,0.0016015064,0.00795987,0.017592248,0.0053715776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013377982,0.00091654464,0.0011269066,0.002901012,0.0064185746,0.014807242,0.0022837026,0.014677088,0.42405972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06853274,0.0012603621,0.0012545013,0.002819325,0.0013275974,0.0058763176,0.0046348693,0.00785126,0.39772055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077453995,0.000103581464,0.0004981288,0.00008553841,0.000007804923,0.000096718475,0.0001749656,0.00009378551,0.00042406554,0.061693113,0.9025306,0.034214254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030601303,0.000033800014,0.00071125745,0.00008996402,0.0000042806,0.00012550039,0.00015366047,0.0001815745,0.00016506978,0.00500472,0.9934777,0.0000219314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010871109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009415307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57594025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004734295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01963267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8215089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100489967","doi":"","title":"PREVENTION OF PROBLEM GAMBLING: LESSONS LEARNED","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Coping (psychology); Control (management); Program evaluation; Table (database); Randomized controlled trial","score_opus":0.16149928606259975,"score_gpt":0.4308508128381493,"score_spread":0.2693515267755495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100489967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1498558,0.23067217,0.057964068,0.49056825,0.005697962,0.0030592794,0.0008840891,0.0013848596,0.059913475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5659743,0.23483361,0.11538117,0.060190685,0.0050050854,0.0017675372,0.00047820705,0.00018949763,0.016179878],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975858,0.0013503925,0.00010818841,0.00015167009,0.00059508963,0.00020886703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928502,0.0050917445,0.00019062527,0.00018621229,0.00055701536,0.0011241524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085434215,0.0010790753,0.0010508677,0.00094306294,0.00065947196,0.0015498579,0.00247998,0.0023497483,0.0034825057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010144096,0.00025837836,0.00062750315,0.00071611605,0.0018099172,0.0013030681,0.0010864954,0.0026828274,0.00049609813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065861404,0.0033623658,0.004535375,0.005895949,0.00015690176,0.00064341526,0.0018254784,0.0022593637,0.0007386497,0.009176325,0.031905018,0.9388425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006459024,0.0324097,0.11119353,0.04853195,0.0019462345,0.0035884988,0.017228507,0.012927563,0.010790459,0.13455997,0.61989844,0.0004660851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03181894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04739838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03181894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019650008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007717333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06326741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100938230","doi":"","title":"HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Notice; Corporate governance; Attendance; Compensation (psychology); Audit committee; Human resources","score_opus":0.07158533534240863,"score_gpt":0.3518638906593098,"score_spread":0.28027855531690116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100938230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046473026,0.0016645488,0.0027289137,0.014967565,0.009265709,0.0041481974,0.012127711,0.0013660738,0.9532665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077193733,0.0021762336,0.0031864226,0.007161989,0.0040045097,0.0055093477,0.009240488,0.0007019971,0.9602996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727629,0.004581109,0.003187287,0.0024336712,0.012218225,0.004816726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9072004,0.008690288,0.0022441924,0.008450208,0.06901316,0.0044017653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022184126,0.0019209546,0.0031107306,0.005378256,0.0072939717,0.0146180745,0.0059113856,0.0119355805,0.4209642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08830846,0.0012457352,0.001497143,0.006623404,0.0020042174,0.0038996283,0.0028144282,0.0069791786,0.5504706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037255944,0.00005262811,0.00019804559,0.00012527453,0.000005883929,0.00004317559,0.00013567021,0.00009057111,0.00015632265,0.012157157,0.96606296,0.020934982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001812394,0.000024598936,0.0013297844,0.00045430483,0.000007854557,0.000034817498,0.00015933142,0.00014748625,0.00009251758,0.0012478969,0.9964557,0.00002750839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04514542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059418723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4209642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010901346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036622062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8259243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102654051","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0033","title":"The law’s own terms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Perspective (graphical); Liability; Framing (construction); Property (philosophy); Economic Justice; Relation (database)","score_opus":0.008273622615102337,"score_gpt":0.25890349847135896,"score_spread":0.2506298758562566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102654051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004314159,0.0065055927,0.017824544,0.13162886,0.0026481769,0.000044895543,0.00016334062,0.00008920978,0.83678114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63391805,0.0055956217,0.01229422,0.04784246,0.006863965,0.0003407081,0.0002718427,0.0003467692,0.2925264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932957,0.0020302255,0.00027610152,0.0010302574,0.0025582223,0.000809345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582183,0.0015555137,0.00022245152,0.000978657,0.0009948397,0.00042671058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005862656,0.00052607,0.0006812139,0.0013253038,0.0068011484,0.011745569,0.0018081401,0.007573051,0.010813434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012617023,0.0004595034,0.0004900087,0.0010693601,0.029919157,0.010059323,0.004898098,0.012278878,0.002536941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.864475e-7,0.0000019183433,0.000017572667,0.0000029780076,5.4277217e-7,0.0000057269945,0.0004940252,0.000015242708,0.000012612667,0.99356306,0.0049447906,0.00094085105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044437274,0.000007241934,0.00011205146,0.00007515773,0.000002893826,0.000048896978,0.0009080038,0.00017741961,0.00007266594,0.62425965,0.37432295,0.000008726546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014012029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012071685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014012029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008208917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008457715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05956012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102710797","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0044","title":"Some leading themes in the contract scholarship of Stephen Waddams","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Certainty; Equity (law)","score_opus":0.023318244356577686,"score_gpt":0.29635687343484957,"score_spread":0.27303862907827187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102710797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029839393,0.12294881,0.016434409,0.45924973,0.0048897597,0.000060567214,0.00009158197,0.000061977036,0.36642373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.707593,0.08526245,0.012648444,0.05104859,0.006380455,0.00021391614,0.00006233733,0.0001847387,0.13660611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971034,0.0012504228,0.000062215535,0.00030208996,0.00097220537,0.0003097098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976776,0.0013520019,0.00013264557,0.00009864247,0.00040796,0.00033120828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004161904,0.0004376966,0.00038821728,0.001297088,0.007214394,0.0061495667,0.0010775519,0.0032223877,0.0036822718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006857238,0.00037128173,0.0002901863,0.0022908975,0.020802056,0.006774129,0.0036033737,0.0055799386,0.00065586134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034423276,0.0000067644773,0.00007611867,0.000014668052,5.4961015e-7,0.00003748949,0.0037342568,0.000036738584,0.000022909437,0.9781068,0.015708733,0.002251476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079529145,0.000019057883,0.00039909038,0.00034923415,0.0000019039908,0.00019869542,0.0065234206,0.0003875771,0.000105925465,0.52765745,0.46432903,0.000020731493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020477576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020682696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020477576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007479455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067959386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054267526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104179944","doi":"10.7202/1121365ar","title":"Qui dit contractuel ne dit pas toujours juste : quel avenir pour la théorie de l’imprévision en droit civil québécois post <i>Churchill Falls</i>  ?","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Civil servants; Context (archaeology); Civil rights","score_opus":0.004905053138466499,"score_gpt":0.22103094491935854,"score_spread":0.21612589178089203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104179944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21626268,0.0043034926,0.033074357,0.05592351,0.00039144285,0.00012035041,0.0002486665,0.00005693274,0.6896186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963103,0.0010633116,0.002243996,0.0015989591,0.000036377063,0.00003805124,0.000037360238,0.000043203032,0.031835616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975719,0.0007002177,0.000054777956,0.00044634423,0.0006390151,0.00058775145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656194,0.0012197868,0.0003440739,0.00039118162,0.0010814178,0.00040159526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003589227,0.0004374234,0.00041444192,0.0013463238,0.00867629,0.007514613,0.0020061755,0.0022030333,0.013698083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069655436,0.00033400432,0.0005416622,0.0014733628,0.029373046,0.005998106,0.002702902,0.0032858367,0.0006273746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100444795,0.000008924582,0.002687421,0.000027914135,0.000008950588,0.00009241904,0.016048271,0.00042583563,0.00007599139,0.97419614,0.0013773195,0.005040724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026476964,0.00006113172,0.025837226,0.0009237408,0.00007995138,0.00025695184,0.0973573,0.004078866,0.0005960156,0.6148723,0.25579625,0.00011375808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7018397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7593378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2981603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041877076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028672203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5998324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111970376","doi":"","title":"Common Law, Civil Law and the Future of Categories","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Civil procedure; Procedural law; Public law; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure","score_opus":0.01003124141926634,"score_gpt":0.26362427498373686,"score_spread":0.2535930335644705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111970376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021310009,0.042096812,0.011843211,0.12385926,0.0016168964,0.00005617884,0.00011369909,0.000052561165,0.79905134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91715884,0.012743631,0.0050385534,0.008254996,0.0012216897,0.00009886547,0.00011613969,0.000051398452,0.055315915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917173,0.0037581078,0.00017619751,0.00068883266,0.0022612852,0.0013984612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941591,0.0026383067,0.00041375615,0.00052382576,0.0014934023,0.0007716743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059287557,0.00041524097,0.00044936768,0.00366964,0.012004946,0.013417735,0.0014145593,0.0031758526,0.004299945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008345062,0.00022866708,0.00037459825,0.0040443745,0.08161056,0.013153065,0.004238958,0.0045598065,0.00058753596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013202457,0.0000010439175,0.000044649987,0.000007981724,4.82411e-7,0.000008962939,0.0023934043,0.000023740402,0.000008385845,0.9923982,0.002503705,0.0026080373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003459645,0.0000058267633,0.0005024069,0.00012328243,0.0000020751052,0.00003137638,0.006061178,0.00010417392,0.00002610871,0.793527,0.19960473,0.000008259833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12798253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14172152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12798253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028089339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021681475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25447518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113531864","doi":"","title":"Feminist Perspectives on Tort Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Feminist theory; Feminist legal theory; Feminism","score_opus":0.05810264907107749,"score_gpt":0.323405126971209,"score_spread":0.2653024779001315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113531864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053002215,0.07509793,0.0034067663,0.111770846,0.0015969248,0.00001401339,0.00013026792,0.000024366267,0.80265856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38155237,0.12327951,0.003731415,0.031710282,0.0046224263,0.00016461215,0.00014400792,0.00010696903,0.45468828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984295,0.0008108248,0.000023993996,0.000119286145,0.00042503816,0.00019136186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987961,0.0009345187,0.00006499412,0.000032407173,0.00011090808,0.00006103246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017502701,0.0005335695,0.0002907321,0.0014027181,0.0046639913,0.0036764594,0.00068874063,0.0019061238,0.008098168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016902367,0.00021145667,0.00023414163,0.0011977159,0.014177524,0.002809063,0.0016788746,0.0036183558,0.0011180622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027039157,0.0000060262505,0.000043235348,0.000037103982,0.0000010610905,0.00006948092,0.0074038706,0.00010862527,0.000059354512,0.9618382,0.024179142,0.0062511642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026702517,0.000005008585,0.00020178508,0.00032709466,0.000001412654,0.00010012185,0.0038951014,0.000071765644,0.00008275645,0.19266543,0.80264264,0.0000041292565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070144455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010422749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008098168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007454848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022145093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05408889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114050099","doi":"","title":"A brief introduction to law in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.008909002177812667,"score_gpt":0.2844586075321548,"score_spread":0.27554960535434214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114050099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008184329,0.061301697,0.0051802504,0.14532183,0.0064468337,0.0005645286,0.008186753,0.00047491488,0.76433885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10866154,0.0900225,0.011596744,0.06126635,0.0022486115,0.00040890416,0.0030914992,0.00034071968,0.7223631],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959786,0.00030201057,0.00019151703,0.0002996026,0.0019676948,0.0012605238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577713,0.0009757028,0.00012266547,0.00008093841,0.0023460991,0.000697449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019349939,0.00090992334,0.0008226246,0.007473288,0.019569155,0.012057589,0.002332611,0.0066339597,0.052238215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066278665,0.0009309079,0.0010520628,0.013685584,0.005902319,0.0031461706,0.001992503,0.006992698,0.0052049267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014065746,0.00006772484,0.0015983232,0.00034314327,0.000010952199,0.0003244304,0.0020223127,0.00067045935,0.00015493282,0.44178098,0.5103567,0.042655997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061726687,0.000008193655,0.0038020804,0.00037013734,0.0000067343594,0.000067340545,0.0015203754,0.00023743919,0.000058417052,0.011845338,0.9820258,0.000052024534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99712014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1843052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1843052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29251164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94609034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114825698","doi":"","title":"Honorarium Payments to Representative Plaintiffs: Doucet v The Royal Winnipeg Ballet","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballet; Payment; Wife; George (robot)","score_opus":0.030804744165582112,"score_gpt":0.3161618862225669,"score_spread":0.2853571420569848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114825698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14227152,0.0064801387,0.0011316106,0.22835109,0.0042878552,0.00046393575,0.0005222342,0.00013574814,0.6163558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5157279,0.0027781364,0.0009218838,0.0933201,0.00091122655,0.00011894175,0.00014750569,0.000120712546,0.38595358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285114,0.0008145979,0.00018405286,0.0008911659,0.0021169663,0.003142168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516463,0.001468093,0.00037768958,0.00018778548,0.0009916406,0.0018100457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006633043,0.0005789205,0.0009934154,0.0013933013,0.014753532,0.010895013,0.0038888461,0.0253597,0.018014599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022821382,0.0011890914,0.00072869734,0.0012717358,0.0030173182,0.0024258578,0.0042456375,0.009919896,0.002378944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004128454,0.000176404,0.009775333,0.0002120662,0.00010531173,0.005784271,0.005659199,0.0006644073,0.0011613799,0.3704503,0.5653395,0.040259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040597358,0.00021733962,0.027459295,0.00045914587,0.00032018122,0.0018915652,0.00742399,0.0015264761,0.0017824075,0.022785706,0.935519,0.00020896884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6321157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8247352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36788428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017776368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04314363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74010164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116053611","doi":"10.1017/9781108953177.016","title":"Index","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Sample (material); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.027737756318313236,"score_gpt":0.24222750386494488,"score_spread":0.21448974754663164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116053611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067384454,0.0141695645,0.002345456,0.0067272284,0.0110619785,0.0006787323,0.05492903,0.0029606451,0.9064536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017288829,0.010353956,0.0011091928,0.0011667851,0.0030900503,0.00021477498,0.025427723,0.0007093556,0.9561993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991947,0.00005054109,0.00008167049,0.00010253362,0.0005086761,0.0000618602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970034,0.00032607155,0.00018647338,0.0002319256,0.0019015151,0.00035060992],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058258564,0.0009971533,0.0009232114,0.0067371232,0.0012147779,0.0053294166,0.001286673,0.00081716035,0.72283435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004849656,0.00044269467,0.00050061685,0.007857669,0.00036339412,0.0032347853,0.0014552508,0.0013194424,0.63068724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012082734,0.0000126604,0.000060190887,0.00032156424,0.0000015774036,0.000018882605,0.000024442199,0.000058639158,0.00012682364,0.0018094934,0.9342058,0.063348055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018845134,0.00000762755,0.0001869044,0.00014419222,0.0000014661832,0.000019437031,0.000016952456,0.000011697668,0.00004698335,0.00062305696,0.99893636,0.0000033366914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005841049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005847987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27716565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019898925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002103618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116598787","doi":"","title":"Estoppel Without Regard to Equity? The Puzzling Omission of Promissory Estoppel’s Inequity Condition in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Supreme court; English law; High Court; Damages; Enforcement","score_opus":0.027501734284349186,"score_gpt":0.32694936950199416,"score_spread":0.29944763521764495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116598787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11909987,0.0064813276,0.008414598,0.23190843,0.00094090396,0.000089492314,0.00042179975,0.00011312695,0.6325305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167967,0.0026258333,0.0020793567,0.03217425,0.0002068955,0.00002935953,0.000063387735,0.000055640146,0.045968644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995682,0.0003762117,0.000104558334,0.0005044556,0.0016941197,0.001638623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967998,0.0010556388,0.00017476435,0.0002001527,0.001278365,0.0004911925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029756904,0.00025476026,0.0004726933,0.0008597162,0.017017115,0.00736546,0.0017762935,0.0041223,0.0052584247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098341685,0.00032667705,0.0004318768,0.0013884744,0.015916388,0.0028804222,0.0029498069,0.008759123,0.00028052478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010587239,0.0000072251737,0.0010191912,0.000019432046,0.00000504397,0.00020832407,0.002189552,0.00016823458,0.000108145985,0.9745461,0.013963507,0.0077547194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064046435,0.000046582692,0.0179184,0.00045592393,0.00009796662,0.0004955707,0.015601719,0.0032973364,0.0017146297,0.43855712,0.521513,0.00023771699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070591405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070591405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.118712194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5121789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117246958","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5962875","title":"&lt;p&gt;Structuring and Executing Real Estate Transactions - A Comparative Study of M&amp;amp;A, Private Equity Investments, Joint Ventures, and Due Diligence in India, The United States, The United Kingdom, Canada, and Singapore&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate; Real estate investment trust; Due diligence; Corporate Real Estate; Jurisdiction; Real estate development; Equity (law); Stock market; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05623347435947919,"score_gpt":0.33142967788909933,"score_spread":0.27519620352962015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117246958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98051226,0.00017423547,0.0001111708,0.0005023404,0.0000036406127,0.000011682592,0.00010304028,0.0000045096667,0.018577054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726665,0.000084235886,0.000052268897,0.000029162218,0.0000015761232,0.000004271072,0.000042144446,0.0000024927963,0.0025172776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892753,0.00039453295,0.000056675693,0.00007809492,0.00018652811,0.0003566437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992004,0.0033906538,0.002149105,0.00033281164,0.00049267407,0.001630757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011331933,0.00009056355,0.00017589513,0.00069451955,0.0020851088,0.0035175353,0.00049547787,0.0006911989,0.007916432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007719016,0.00016584955,0.00015443463,0.0021837375,0.00224789,0.002402084,0.0010578054,0.0007517289,0.0006923309],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005279748,0.0008263635,0.7449127,0.00010615064,0.000040544015,0.0015131248,0.12872899,0.0015461745,0.0010950501,0.049324095,0.005675238,0.06570361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003329543,0.00026770338,0.82646894,0.00007886355,0.000018365281,0.000247478,0.15025696,0.0013410263,0.00037804828,0.0066289296,0.014261843,0.000018433871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103910506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25363484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8960895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003006716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005055679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20661134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117267312","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5962815","title":"&lt;p&gt;Structuring and Executing Real Estate Transactions - A Comparative Study of M&amp;amp;A, Private Equity Investments, Joint Ventures, and Due Diligence in India, The United States, The United Kingdom, Canada, and Singapore&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate; Real estate investment trust; Due diligence; Corporate Real Estate; Jurisdiction; Real estate development; Equity (law); Stock market; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05823323271888954,"score_gpt":0.3378336781190865,"score_spread":0.27960044540019696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117267312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97754014,0.00019605047,0.00012482233,0.00054743135,0.0000040630457,0.000012065349,0.00010664733,0.000004857027,0.021463985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702364,0.00009081404,0.00005716498,0.000029887833,0.0000017026496,0.000004358039,0.000043001106,0.0000027151289,0.0027467033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894994,0.00039480903,0.0000547772,0.00007778003,0.00018470758,0.00033799355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920814,0.0034676704,0.002072562,0.00033198964,0.00047363818,0.0015726642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011550577,0.000091382826,0.0001780615,0.0006984999,0.0020367953,0.0035342972,0.0004923982,0.0006933563,0.008349254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007800927,0.00016209541,0.00015036539,0.0022199082,0.0022525566,0.0024762813,0.0010622446,0.00075251656,0.00070758536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005812096,0.0009069581,0.7192666,0.000118359545,0.00004274134,0.001571233,0.1347962,0.0017419119,0.0011496592,0.060105618,0.006575713,0.07314372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003587921,0.00028155095,0.81272525,0.00008886662,0.000019892956,0.00026264752,0.15985318,0.0014748836,0.00041673097,0.008343897,0.016477862,0.000019308809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09140295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22405627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90859705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029175165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047600972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18174183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117371820","doi":"10.1017/9781009652513.004","title":"Hertford College Oxford","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Subject (documents); Exposition (narrative)","score_opus":0.029135523259851942,"score_gpt":0.24177941721996357,"score_spread":0.21264389396011163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117371820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080632145,0.022121508,0.0005619754,0.005271988,0.0030975337,0.000027540997,0.00064814714,0.00030252154,0.96716243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001787347,0.0024662493,0.00017847553,0.00025199252,0.00010393571,0.000006983582,0.00008510634,0.00006509368,0.99505484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991308,0.00010160615,0.00005238688,0.00019927166,0.0003620204,0.00015396113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987827,0.0002217067,0.00008442978,0.0001352054,0.00023308721,0.0005429119],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006526989,0.0008003848,0.0005428471,0.002099681,0.0022553962,0.0070445705,0.0008650051,0.0026317693,0.42574143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002165082,0.00068885094,0.00030141821,0.0022859275,0.001016061,0.003845659,0.0017264878,0.0024972146,0.149096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042039497,0.000025952348,0.0002494491,0.0002525889,0.000002582277,0.00020849191,0.0006655168,0.00006951795,0.00039148197,0.052078594,0.8157012,0.13031265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001428,0.0000054960324,0.00015147049,0.00006443459,4.9467405e-7,0.00005084912,0.0000828082,0.000005797349,0.000044181263,0.00050904916,0.9990816,0.0000023787347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010553531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060190387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42574143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028963676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030136926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81911016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117520968","doi":"","title":"Actual Uses Versus Paper Owners: The Ontario Court of Appeal’s Decision in Kosicki v Toronto (City) in Context","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02842413119442819,"score_gpt":0.3078785873821956,"score_spread":0.2794544561877674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117520968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20102192,0.0046978095,0.0016371385,0.2384815,0.00071965845,0.00021263894,0.0010869819,0.000035757985,0.5521067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8696679,0.0018647662,0.0006324898,0.029317774,0.00034776455,0.00008126226,0.00013989615,0.0000726672,0.09787551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914528,0.0012039128,0.00033396683,0.00083334127,0.002622172,0.0035537349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990672,0.0041847616,0.0005316617,0.00044715786,0.002656441,0.0015079106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063717947,0.00043457313,0.0005585276,0.0018664206,0.03561179,0.016780674,0.003363857,0.016102392,0.009182238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015290507,0.0011492469,0.0009346108,0.0037303127,0.0206665,0.005569476,0.0044625336,0.011863831,0.00057383126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010375423,0.00003477443,0.009574966,0.0000878479,0.0000444472,0.0016537535,0.050112642,0.00027507148,0.0005070778,0.8343522,0.096594505,0.006658978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016072646,0.00004248284,0.044953518,0.00065741956,0.00031419113,0.0004888046,0.11593055,0.0010310109,0.0017849607,0.10171586,0.73257345,0.0003470505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98515785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14057347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14057347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15871002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99681294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117524944","doi":"","title":"Is Aboriginal Title to Submerged Land “Cognizable” to the Canadian Common Law? Lessons from Sea Country Litigation in Australia","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Indigenous; Legislation; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.026608535608123922,"score_gpt":0.34255628043773195,"score_spread":0.315947744829608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117524944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18276724,0.0039039843,0.0022064352,0.096892975,0.00039343128,0.00008864391,0.00013636709,0.000035710666,0.71357524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326288,0.002398688,0.0010777243,0.014957957,0.00011895466,0.00004614628,0.000039736784,0.000036572797,0.048695434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918498,0.0015288427,0.00022363957,0.00076051266,0.0024722687,0.0031650986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98841316,0.0050387266,0.00051057263,0.00050635205,0.004269453,0.0012617573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067285923,0.00032272682,0.00073350157,0.0021791821,0.029090056,0.016802458,0.0035483052,0.009480504,0.0074970936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02268096,0.0005435639,0.00056922575,0.003090341,0.030026615,0.0059661795,0.0049038697,0.010265613,0.00041655285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023920918,0.00002775714,0.004661925,0.000078549325,0.000019961435,0.0007267914,0.07903675,0.00036169132,0.00017518879,0.8826901,0.019954424,0.012242893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005533148,0.000056179833,0.045993526,0.0014970641,0.00021274356,0.00076272764,0.26580682,0.0022142895,0.0007764267,0.26340935,0.41889262,0.00032292656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9876582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07975347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07975347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15032412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57865465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117979958","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-06858-3_9","title":"New Zealand and Manitoba Unexplained Wealth Law: Surveying the Rights Landscape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Liability; Real property; Property law; Property rights","score_opus":0.02198729222815175,"score_gpt":0.2788151382868991,"score_spread":0.2568278460587473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117979958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115831874,0.022407075,0.00062241993,0.015871832,0.00015348427,0.00009060963,0.0006503041,0.000029533832,0.8443429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7767356,0.02498201,0.0020188307,0.0027978267,0.00009300234,0.00016681233,0.00051460374,0.00009684502,0.19259442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853337,0.00021999567,0.00005504294,0.00013880922,0.00056754914,0.00048527512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835783,0.000554055,0.00023564881,0.00011657199,0.00041138547,0.0003244689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013859048,0.00038308065,0.0005060302,0.0061617666,0.0063570216,0.0096639935,0.0012489336,0.0016175915,0.01619111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063447026,0.000438987,0.00035406605,0.014226223,0.011115292,0.007056044,0.0036007552,0.0027497108,0.00060230965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011963087,0.00007743281,0.024463812,0.0003959517,0.00003764837,0.0010866105,0.046128657,0.0004391767,0.0008065137,0.7640913,0.046545524,0.11580775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032343676,0.00007369847,0.2675954,0.0013558166,0.0000633954,0.00054850196,0.09769672,0.00068049954,0.0003937432,0.067216694,0.56426245,0.0000808028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8852591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97186905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9587715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04122848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032970626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29913497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125684045","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-008","title":"1.6 “Principles to Ensure the Law is Not Abused in Canada”","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Action (physics); Liability; Poison control; Tort","score_opus":0.04551611397754908,"score_gpt":0.2276473365338274,"score_spread":0.18213122255627834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125684045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018220549,0.008417788,0.001964623,0.040239383,0.0012997644,0.0001643643,0.0008703184,0.00018414196,0.94503766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037937086,0.004188896,0.0033970275,0.028528754,0.00022780075,0.00014427035,0.0004003144,0.00014610411,0.9250297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927862,0.000517624,0.00015968319,0.00042900443,0.004353607,0.0017539156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967753,0.00041841218,0.0000875433,0.00013460102,0.0022806523,0.00030351678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030041472,0.00081420055,0.00043972995,0.0018392762,0.011638259,0.008126043,0.0027354353,0.009464339,0.022578506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075470516,0.00088663364,0.0007215284,0.0019450124,0.008588234,0.0022731945,0.0018359779,0.00832708,0.0060417983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081820635,0.00002014467,0.00034831522,0.000072738185,0.000004475489,0.00009444701,0.0020686856,0.00021305772,0.00018328143,0.48770547,0.49351418,0.015766976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069486896,0.000007732546,0.0016580359,0.00022630634,0.000009348879,0.000056045636,0.00066818116,0.00016751727,0.0002524353,0.01722116,0.9796932,0.000033150343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9797467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052962802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052962802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15080222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38427383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126973335","doi":"","title":"Flogging a dead maxim? The future viability of the ex turpi rule in Australian law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maxim; Common law; Statutory law; Ex parte; Plaintiff; Scope (computer science); Cause of action; Legislature; Statute; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.01372084244336728,"score_gpt":0.25218927109673533,"score_spread":0.23846842865336806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126973335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07843727,0.038451225,0.007963072,0.28361964,0.0022899364,0.000058896727,0.000045632205,0.000057453046,0.58907694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85865813,0.010285664,0.003692373,0.042213682,0.0011637885,0.00007627897,0.00002447854,0.000043019398,0.08384245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546343,0.0019882778,0.0001591887,0.00053523155,0.0011379085,0.00071605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996561,0.0018550123,0.00028640727,0.00039978704,0.00057464914,0.0003231309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091173025,0.00027940798,0.00033110625,0.0010204959,0.007481363,0.008384766,0.0014850089,0.0065989182,0.0040180464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012306227,0.00041793706,0.00038470406,0.00086560444,0.027692443,0.011822309,0.003528247,0.009031415,0.000768495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009870973,0.000013060027,0.00026856008,0.0000405972,0.0000017227246,0.00015936671,0.008682991,0.00006552296,0.00012021259,0.96664786,0.0073342435,0.016655952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000117697755,0.000086267384,0.0043522953,0.0007308034,0.000009796339,0.000284217,0.006600987,0.00091019715,0.00030264986,0.58977103,0.39688447,0.000055472472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045086615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053741507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045086615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009407679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070359698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089648366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128186374","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.445","title":"Postscript to “Employment Class Actions: Is the Work Culture of Banks Under Attack?”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Overtime; Legislation; Class action; Working class; Class (philosophy); Work (physics); Labour law; Financial services","score_opus":0.11703182975526079,"score_gpt":0.3876080377037702,"score_spread":0.27057620794850945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128186374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025298072,0.016477661,0.0008980744,0.60543627,0.05508027,0.0011432281,0.0044504185,0.0003183493,0.3136659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034639534,0.010652648,0.0015272625,0.4854969,0.0137324715,0.0007239661,0.0015640681,0.00015525143,0.45150784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910028,0.0008057302,0.0004900439,0.0006309155,0.0054440056,0.0016265047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98043597,0.0035611007,0.0004983619,0.000547462,0.01337246,0.0015846839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062413095,0.0007127282,0.0007118884,0.00184051,0.009843101,0.0047377804,0.0035227272,0.010891217,0.03320231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015815154,0.0005430645,0.00078219443,0.0013098046,0.006416145,0.002075086,0.0020877507,0.009729772,0.010629048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033926544,0.000006833419,0.00009181609,0.00007258299,0.0000015605592,0.00002611423,0.000402354,0.000014372357,0.00007437011,0.0056446777,0.99036026,0.003301635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012986027,0.000010430565,0.0024134263,0.00035189753,0.000011469071,0.000023005148,0.00089000876,0.000036369674,0.00016484,0.0011519217,0.99490696,0.000026687303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90915376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9322894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90915376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028939435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10840118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20997125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128201290","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i1.103","title":"Whither Common Law Claims for Secondary Market Misrepresentation?: An Analysis of Certification Decisions in <i>McCann V CP Ships, Silver V Imax, Mckenna V Gammon Gold, and Dobbie V Arctic Glacier</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Statutory law; Common law; Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Cause of action; Certification; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.11737825005482269,"score_gpt":0.36785129838043035,"score_spread":0.2504730483256077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128201290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4157786,0.03737721,0.0031838478,0.115767404,0.00072833104,0.00050915894,0.00082847814,0.00004943581,0.4257775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95661604,0.009017781,0.0005859907,0.009572753,0.0003173224,0.00011201819,0.00020574554,0.000026610462,0.02354567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97982854,0.00350792,0.0005773018,0.0014298444,0.008868074,0.005788355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557779,0.024396127,0.006763177,0.00085455284,0.010773865,0.0014343647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014650555,0.00032789801,0.0007865368,0.00899157,0.009294026,0.010483634,0.0028892595,0.005420397,0.005514999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0481093,0.0004817069,0.0010616801,0.008622258,0.015955416,0.004640163,0.0029264954,0.0044442676,0.00041009157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000734488,0.000082952,0.01924718,0.0005508198,0.00008145415,0.001514376,0.06365783,0.00042645767,0.00026798667,0.836409,0.03884169,0.038846932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014483534,0.00017531027,0.27845693,0.0032420715,0.0006386124,0.0010875426,0.13661967,0.0023711508,0.0013820963,0.14014176,0.43550298,0.00023705253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8063244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86893076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19367558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061399523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085639894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44548678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204548","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v5i2.268","title":"Narrowing Section 31(1): The Effects of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in <i>Kerr V. Danier</i> On the Ontario Costs Regime","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.021535546056113013,"score_gpt":0.2768654842428559,"score_spread":0.2553299381867429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046803422,0.006883685,0.0017470053,0.17083679,0.0024154054,0.00036270302,0.0028008746,0.00013815305,0.768012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61051893,0.0050946632,0.0030549197,0.19222184,0.0017084801,0.00033696266,0.00063271617,0.00019299492,0.18623842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755938,0.0019975516,0.0005571218,0.001772824,0.013140003,0.006938742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837519,0.0060561914,0.00069793046,0.00067569176,0.007336359,0.0014819421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010779105,0.0008095125,0.0010913513,0.0038719336,0.021436261,0.01399001,0.004322652,0.015477528,0.008369618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034711234,0.0009597364,0.0015969253,0.003471105,0.0118424585,0.0028941983,0.0030446895,0.012213388,0.0009457483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100630066,0.00003640824,0.0027043424,0.00013551643,0.00005554533,0.0002927392,0.0034370855,0.00071897864,0.0006554056,0.751004,0.2319334,0.008925947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029030893,0.00007015688,0.03669859,0.0009070393,0.0005451542,0.00015966724,0.0045556095,0.0017118062,0.0026673432,0.089167066,0.86281365,0.00041368348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99581856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13907911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13907911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22306743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128208207","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i1.39","title":"Secondary Market Liability in Ontario: Interpreting the Leave Test Before and After <i>Theratechnologies</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Test (biology); Liability; Economic Justice; Legislative intent; Secondary market","score_opus":0.026534694326912644,"score_gpt":0.31059514158139895,"score_spread":0.2840604472544863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128208207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10898341,0.01683854,0.008053311,0.14216785,0.00250459,0.00038285903,0.00067983806,0.00013817796,0.7202514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8277947,0.0088530425,0.0055189645,0.03634779,0.0008487114,0.00016021343,0.00021615172,0.00008852366,0.12017189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98417056,0.001605822,0.0007344456,0.0010242974,0.00904766,0.003417208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860065,0.0055693057,0.0012967094,0.00063339877,0.0055232407,0.00097078783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101202745,0.00042356184,0.00052894425,0.0025051737,0.014312523,0.0073046307,0.0026591064,0.0064422362,0.003447347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024305843,0.00049687945,0.00071751536,0.0020967338,0.016967261,0.0025429379,0.003391986,0.004851357,0.00041209863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003631481,0.0000225686,0.011966838,0.00026932536,0.000018269186,0.0018707155,0.022680119,0.00046776584,0.001214429,0.8503716,0.07561569,0.035466366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036552527,0.00006302864,0.0430428,0.0012859515,0.000106156374,0.0006998458,0.016249498,0.0012531269,0.0017850214,0.06844706,0.866863,0.00016790829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9677048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98651904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098602556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098602556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16763802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.715415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128220993","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.373","title":"Common Law Securities Misrepresentation Claims — Still with us in the Post- <i>Green</i> Era?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Common law; Damages; Supreme court; Statutory law; Class action; Certification; English law","score_opus":0.03935244128611594,"score_gpt":0.33256707909535366,"score_spread":0.29321463780923773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128220993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01275035,0.042566847,0.0013741615,0.85258937,0.003954052,0.000045141664,0.00017687856,0.000033424352,0.086509846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3677046,0.040061716,0.0031049708,0.5246432,0.005359176,0.00006883779,0.00016943958,0.000068564834,0.058819585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849081,0.0023437918,0.0005495065,0.00179408,0.0071911043,0.0032134717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721149,0.013798306,0.0019913928,0.0012535925,0.009392051,0.0014498156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019725395,0.0004189722,0.0008059796,0.0022748671,0.011010419,0.012926269,0.0040839543,0.015702626,0.0034810482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038099088,0.00039801782,0.0010302837,0.0028169882,0.026473012,0.009184446,0.002662547,0.017065061,0.0006512388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024270075,0.000020545716,0.0014547207,0.00022935415,0.000025602842,0.00048827147,0.00794067,0.000079459154,0.00034514198,0.81481844,0.13903505,0.03553845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028539935,0.000030639505,0.006289829,0.001348052,0.00007963814,0.00027359082,0.01052737,0.00020252219,0.00075615663,0.12796322,0.8523939,0.00010647903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7575912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8783512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7575912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046463493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09093423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4876728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128229737","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.449","title":"The Space Between Rule 20 and 21: The Evidentiary Burden on Certification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Test (biology); Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Common law; Space (punctuation); Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.0651739564324587,"score_gpt":0.35710822867018005,"score_spread":0.29193427223772134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128229737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061838306,0.017922912,0.085697316,0.16169229,0.003901515,0.0003644952,0.00034228194,0.00013587212,0.66810495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.868611,0.0066605024,0.026168127,0.06543934,0.0025999297,0.000317324,0.00015393169,0.00008051007,0.029969368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96152097,0.008221379,0.0029417528,0.00461431,0.019811207,0.0028903603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723041,0.016799105,0.0023743452,0.002600005,0.005109112,0.0008132752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02367744,0.00048856705,0.0012770571,0.0022363535,0.006307959,0.010657211,0.0039907065,0.012092453,0.0027649254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043351043,0.0006167296,0.0013243229,0.0011567153,0.030893324,0.008050529,0.004676588,0.014903759,0.0011492436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071762292,0.000009110679,0.00017826304,0.000034808585,0.000004966327,0.00008843853,0.0005780539,0.00013200019,0.00015881982,0.9915876,0.0024611214,0.0047596674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003388236,0.00011253748,0.0012919988,0.0004936643,0.000033552446,0.00036332043,0.0008219296,0.00056588015,0.0007441121,0.8854237,0.1100437,0.0000717072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03453858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038399376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96546143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008960344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02625296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12521976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128242591","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.005","title":"Questions About Leave Test for Secondary Market Claims Remain Unanswered After Court of Appeal Decision in <i>Rahimi V Southgobi Resources Ltd</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Issuer; Test (biology); High Court; Federal court; Court of record; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.02316075692114236,"score_gpt":0.3274152954170828,"score_spread":0.3042545384959404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128242591","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04686584,0.032255214,0.004771287,0.45856023,0.006676441,0.0005176832,0.0010407484,0.00016205026,0.4491506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6210543,0.013958679,0.005384788,0.24898098,0.004371665,0.0003676634,0.00066339126,0.00012149044,0.10509698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751729,0.0025535882,0.0015103201,0.0024682602,0.01365672,0.004638234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589691,0.022380238,0.0019176124,0.0010465445,0.013600119,0.0020864336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024176732,0.0003783036,0.00092580204,0.0028385685,0.009604095,0.008154212,0.0047051804,0.013092992,0.0042824256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058850992,0.0005201567,0.001115375,0.0016363941,0.013322541,0.003192882,0.0024249593,0.011857975,0.0013394289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006859409,0.00005045382,0.0066124042,0.0005815809,0.000050652397,0.0018552606,0.008408165,0.00020660511,0.0013487323,0.69837624,0.22952493,0.052916273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009268549,0.0001263517,0.01725411,0.0025486506,0.0002059864,0.0007972167,0.0075050485,0.00059770246,0.0023985975,0.07688655,0.8913895,0.00019764947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54875433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7222072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45124567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027686216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08109392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9078063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128250771","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.99","title":"Some Reflections on The “Responsible Issuer” Definition and Jurisdictional Aspects of Securities Class Actions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Issuer; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Misrepresentation; Statutory law; Pleading; Legislation; Extraterritoriality","score_opus":0.19401747695125843,"score_gpt":0.3988025013583506,"score_spread":0.20478502440709218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128250771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0252172,0.012164318,0.031060897,0.5785688,0.0013469539,0.00012862404,0.0002432796,0.00005358832,0.35121635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686824,0.004822532,0.011048543,0.077921554,0.0021814678,0.00019591801,0.000095719675,0.00011832558,0.034933407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96809644,0.011880297,0.0012595722,0.004399865,0.009386168,0.004977621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98132503,0.012372346,0.0008297774,0.0011648448,0.0035669107,0.0007410675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024639143,0.00084169506,0.0012032734,0.002202954,0.017138112,0.024277057,0.010027269,0.019782385,0.003837506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022819068,0.0011043835,0.0015124853,0.0020488387,0.11918938,0.016802229,0.006147868,0.026185112,0.00042590327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018786117,0.0000026047885,0.00007167317,0.000006323943,0.0000011373695,0.000045578705,0.0035215626,0.000048926333,0.000030484196,0.9938175,0.0019828577,0.00046945835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028174893,0.000017738326,0.0015644772,0.0003175603,0.000019957813,0.00018203253,0.011661247,0.0010311655,0.0003777212,0.8071047,0.1776237,0.0000715998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5607283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52142483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5607283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059125267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03746976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8837173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128558076","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt of Agent Raiford&apos;s accounts for 2nd quarter of 1851","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.03215117005209569,"score_gpt":0.2813288892186946,"score_spread":0.2491777191665989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128558076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006380163,0.004019891,0.0006255569,0.75206393,0.014594148,0.00006992725,0.0006918495,0.0002815081,0.22127308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028853988,0.0006331586,0.00025440735,0.54228956,0.003708126,0.00008002757,0.00011349939,0.00011312764,0.42395413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984871,0.000283233,0.00009710774,0.00025505864,0.00042016307,0.00045726684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758685,0.0013211308,0.00015373729,0.00010862316,0.00063721853,0.00019248617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022749938,0.00041544548,0.000719833,0.0005974134,0.011389498,0.0060989494,0.001687202,0.02589213,0.022753049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010186784,0.0007336648,0.0006934392,0.00064868847,0.0020642045,0.0034030897,0.001627869,0.017416093,0.00985582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003096366,0.000010155144,0.00036841002,0.000023055487,0.0000059229974,0.00038275568,0.00079624617,0.000023146562,0.00013586319,0.022585483,0.9733385,0.0022995598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112444495,0.000013727936,0.0012393532,0.00008018725,0.0000075900175,0.00013788404,0.0008506666,0.00010444047,0.00020354864,0.0035314595,0.9937878,0.000032004453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067217715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1312767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067217715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044326223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044532814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13365293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128561262","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt Agent Butler&apos;s accounts for 3rd quarter 1851","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.036341950101162965,"score_gpt":0.2834771959178825,"score_spread":0.24713524581671953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128561262","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041094464,0.004507303,0.00069377734,0.6152489,0.015519138,0.00010425887,0.000662377,0.00029896956,0.35885584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017679559,0.0005308064,0.0002015652,0.30708298,0.0027984623,0.00007270866,0.00008588819,0.000104946994,0.6714431],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986091,0.00023550613,0.000079741345,0.00023224088,0.00046774032,0.0003756788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817884,0.00079156767,0.00009421284,0.00009168165,0.0006777608,0.00016591225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018132352,0.00038041963,0.000633318,0.0005682343,0.010522977,0.0055824183,0.0015387015,0.021005591,0.043115247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008877722,0.00065101474,0.0005750692,0.00060746074,0.0018349175,0.0031080213,0.0016543769,0.014152793,0.017566133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021094342,0.000009145534,0.00021325385,0.000018953331,0.0000032442895,0.00019172076,0.00044386194,0.00001524396,0.00011139023,0.01941942,0.9772903,0.002262456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008404076,0.000008223328,0.0005840518,0.000048131325,0.000004285388,0.00006713026,0.000470359,0.000060002516,0.000122014455,0.002433807,0.99617803,0.00001562181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080269806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15167244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080269806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049828608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047478103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1596052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128564367","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt of Agent Raiford&apos;s accounts for 3rd quarter 1851","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03419729592582558,"score_gpt":0.28296341177861273,"score_spread":0.24876611585278716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128564367","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005308014,0.0034881441,0.0008000692,0.7043864,0.014453456,0.000085333464,0.0006666423,0.00035112098,0.27046084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02390871,0.00048198272,0.00027791446,0.4997836,0.0031480908,0.00008479482,0.0000930379,0.00012364736,0.47209814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998095,0.00036094603,0.00012687882,0.0003113609,0.00055852614,0.0005473359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997118,0.001527241,0.00017058228,0.00014729434,0.0008144128,0.00022238957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027836254,0.00045922011,0.00080633024,0.0006362891,0.012338006,0.0070599206,0.0019617053,0.029800199,0.026909983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012012895,0.00083303667,0.0008354333,0.00070844195,0.0022457072,0.003655351,0.0017269094,0.019376555,0.01243185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031087435,0.000011441589,0.0003381642,0.00002308471,0.000006070899,0.00034235613,0.0007563012,0.000026401056,0.00013631188,0.024395702,0.97156274,0.0023703114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001129777,0.0000137975585,0.0009509018,0.00007557573,0.000008136043,0.00011577116,0.00074118207,0.00011799263,0.00019244556,0.0035987766,0.99414283,0.00003122361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07833469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.146445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07833469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052943435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005326076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15575749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128578416","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt of Agent Butler&apos;s accounts for 2nd quarter 1851 &amp; 4th quarter 1850","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Receipt; Payment; Data collection","score_opus":0.03812939587639347,"score_gpt":0.286749084215751,"score_spread":0.24861968833935755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128578416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065079466,0.00405427,0.0007844615,0.5725866,0.014645813,0.000084514875,0.0008752331,0.00039544769,0.40006572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020341916,0.0005326132,0.00025793788,0.2548695,0.0016800697,0.00005004084,0.00013031265,0.00009717763,0.7220404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989994,0.0001506283,0.00005935708,0.0001706014,0.00032499898,0.00029508473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984315,0.0006241529,0.0000943768,0.000061007042,0.00062272925,0.00016616772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013145518,0.00031028254,0.000505538,0.000499531,0.00953077,0.004756046,0.0013043713,0.014862692,0.047034428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006960337,0.00061995006,0.0004829303,0.0004958322,0.0013164732,0.0025434569,0.0016099686,0.011350456,0.019294081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002327971,0.000008545135,0.00034111744,0.000021233158,0.000003576943,0.00026216664,0.00061506516,0.000014412154,0.00018425367,0.015771354,0.97978365,0.002971297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005743316,0.000008968593,0.00084476004,0.00004384422,0.0000039065812,0.00009189419,0.0005476768,0.000046175497,0.000160831,0.001430861,0.9968014,0.000013895558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08154864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1675507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08154864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034369228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004273811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16214794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128579901","doi":"","title":"[Letter from Geo. W. Manypenny] Acknowledging receipt of Sub Agent Smithson&apos;s account for 2nd quarter of 1853","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.026631187123663486,"score_gpt":0.26871473073190816,"score_spread":0.24208354360824466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128579901","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021399662,0.004170828,0.0004554635,0.849685,0.027672492,0.000048480208,0.00058071484,0.00022064529,0.11502633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014366915,0.0013048567,0.00027371792,0.5288906,0.0054027457,0.000058978934,0.00015277763,0.00013941986,0.44941005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993612,0.00009793075,0.000037988808,0.000119704615,0.00024574538,0.00013735922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867475,0.0006090961,0.00009090461,0.00006428869,0.00041177534,0.00014917889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009785873,0.0003765625,0.0004950589,0.0005087131,0.0059328773,0.0029154879,0.00090567255,0.011219973,0.04486643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061214725,0.0005164086,0.00037097975,0.00062642404,0.0011287223,0.0020621251,0.0011924442,0.009742672,0.020631734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008665389,0.0000024330154,0.000088398774,0.000009065251,0.0000014668852,0.00009599613,0.00009002922,0.0000053552353,0.000051060775,0.0021924502,0.9957111,0.0017439551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006096398,0.00000553468,0.0008000057,0.000040913772,0.000002780245,0.000104550534,0.00035056248,0.000046040223,0.00012414604,0.0017200653,0.99678767,0.0000116743095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029970275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069040686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04486643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016126957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002363342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1500932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128580615","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt of Agent Butler&apos;s accounts for 4th quarter 1852","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.03418998087225686,"score_gpt":0.2811431243256728,"score_spread":0.24695314345341593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128580615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005522189,0.0037152376,0.00076006533,0.6978905,0.014890939,0.00009003784,0.0006623231,0.00032101534,0.27614766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024147432,0.0005128431,0.00026856977,0.44131866,0.0031397447,0.000079456186,0.00009794841,0.00011272523,0.5303226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984452,0.00028991955,0.00009843802,0.0002517306,0.00048762545,0.00042706673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976866,0.0011614835,0.00012827992,0.000114499366,0.00071251875,0.0001965589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002131589,0.0003670942,0.0006720114,0.00060447166,0.0105321575,0.0058270795,0.0016208792,0.024387684,0.02918991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101673445,0.00071406784,0.00062412664,0.00065355113,0.00205109,0.0032424154,0.0016404002,0.016169537,0.012257816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002997978,0.000010837433,0.0003137963,0.000023040244,0.000005264906,0.00031129376,0.00074365636,0.000021780512,0.00016439328,0.021265404,0.9746858,0.002424711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009572264,0.000011628416,0.0008578012,0.000057034213,0.0000059134477,0.00009601416,0.0006802038,0.00008516222,0.00017956959,0.002924145,0.9950712,0.000021923379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07939511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16053203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07939511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048927623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047895364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15786594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128604295","doi":"10.26180/10064021","title":"Abolition or Reform: The Future for Directness as a Requirement of Trespass in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Set (abstract data type); Watson; Recklessness; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03703769275055159,"score_gpt":0.31234999788740825,"score_spread":0.27531230513685667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128604295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40480968,0.006126461,0.008848289,0.17364219,0.0005888286,0.00022226917,0.000030495354,0.000042356456,0.40568933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96997917,0.0012850581,0.0017128496,0.010484334,0.0001488755,0.000073363095,0.000007820338,0.000010193731,0.016298238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897804,0.004156355,0.0006622365,0.0008974285,0.0023173136,0.0021861724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99237895,0.003414059,0.00091399334,0.000884695,0.0013689061,0.0010394582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007929344,0.00017132796,0.0005803561,0.0007453461,0.0073071416,0.008885877,0.001959015,0.00950996,0.0030910405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020033857,0.00054951035,0.00062081806,0.000450342,0.030742107,0.00737172,0.008290995,0.009977596,0.00030249602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025879812,0.00006558001,0.0021336274,0.00007483518,0.0000072249372,0.0006734861,0.012179677,0.00039143107,0.00067375944,0.96921545,0.0017640532,0.012794972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012113272,0.0007400356,0.029880932,0.0014689602,0.000104746585,0.0023223294,0.036733367,0.0062912568,0.002301698,0.70185256,0.21793881,0.0002440304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079017274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081643716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079017274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009981779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018176699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15711468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128608677","doi":"10.26180/10065230","title":"The Australian PPSA from a Canadian Perspective: Some Comparative Reflections","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Position (finance); Security interest; Legislature; Falling (accident); Collateral","score_opus":0.04450877372500308,"score_gpt":0.31839299242033486,"score_spread":0.2738842186953318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128608677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101220444,0.03156971,0.0016348632,0.15458773,0.0013328473,0.000112476315,0.00034915138,0.000040062765,0.70915276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85002583,0.037513763,0.002361035,0.02334575,0.00031112888,0.00010259096,0.00017380921,0.00007365864,0.086092524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98497206,0.004204162,0.00038303813,0.00077525474,0.006000199,0.0036653427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98874134,0.0032490965,0.00042476994,0.0002635004,0.0059443144,0.0013769637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010028562,0.00049024366,0.0006583881,0.0052407975,0.03196684,0.011943579,0.0023960697,0.0037922736,0.008825513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01771239,0.0005332441,0.0006896585,0.015264827,0.010868806,0.004861619,0.0043662568,0.0071497248,0.0005085153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008699821,0.00008334379,0.003739437,0.00057701964,0.000029649149,0.0011158818,0.1292289,0.0004966136,0.00042606733,0.75261116,0.06130485,0.050300017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016914453,0.000064870284,0.024949597,0.00096480356,0.000067163506,0.00037885783,0.17532894,0.00077759713,0.00039213602,0.022147395,0.77474785,0.0001638062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17857826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17857826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15473266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9527328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128620998","doi":"10.26180/10064021.v1","title":"Abolition or Reform: The Future for Directness as a Requirement of Trespass in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Set (abstract data type); Watson; Recklessness; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03703769275055159,"score_gpt":0.31234999788740825,"score_spread":0.27531230513685667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128620998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40480968,0.006126461,0.008848289,0.17364219,0.0005888286,0.00022226917,0.000030495354,0.000042356456,0.40568933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96997917,0.0012850581,0.0017128496,0.010484334,0.0001488755,0.000073363095,0.000007820338,0.000010193731,0.016298238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897804,0.004156355,0.0006622365,0.0008974285,0.0023173136,0.0021861724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99237895,0.003414059,0.00091399334,0.000884695,0.0013689061,0.0010394582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007929344,0.00017132796,0.0005803561,0.0007453461,0.0073071416,0.008885877,0.001959015,0.00950996,0.0030910405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020033857,0.00054951035,0.00062081806,0.000450342,0.030742107,0.00737172,0.008290995,0.009977596,0.00030249602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025879812,0.00006558001,0.0021336274,0.00007483518,0.0000072249372,0.0006734861,0.012179677,0.00039143107,0.00067375944,0.96921545,0.0017640532,0.012794972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012113272,0.0007400356,0.029880932,0.0014689602,0.000104746585,0.0023223294,0.036733367,0.0062912568,0.002301698,0.70185256,0.21793881,0.0002440304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079017274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081643716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079017274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009981779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018176699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15711468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128627839","doi":"10.26180/10065230.v1","title":"The Australian PPSA from a Canadian Perspective: Some Comparative Reflections","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Position (finance); Security interest; Legislature; Falling (accident); Collateral","score_opus":0.04450877372500308,"score_gpt":0.31839299242033486,"score_spread":0.2738842186953318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128627839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101220444,0.03156971,0.0016348632,0.15458773,0.0013328473,0.000112476315,0.00034915138,0.000040062765,0.70915276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85002583,0.037513763,0.002361035,0.02334575,0.00031112888,0.00010259096,0.00017380921,0.00007365864,0.086092524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98497206,0.004204162,0.00038303813,0.00077525474,0.006000199,0.0036653427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98874134,0.0032490965,0.00042476994,0.0002635004,0.0059443144,0.0013769637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010028562,0.00049024366,0.0006583881,0.0052407975,0.03196684,0.011943579,0.0023960697,0.0037922736,0.008825513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01771239,0.0005332441,0.0006896585,0.015264827,0.010868806,0.004861619,0.0043662568,0.0071497248,0.0005085153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008699821,0.00008334379,0.003739437,0.00057701964,0.000029649149,0.0011158818,0.1292289,0.0004966136,0.00042606733,0.75261116,0.06130485,0.050300017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016914453,0.000064870284,0.024949597,0.00096480356,0.000067163506,0.00037885783,0.17532894,0.00077759713,0.00039213602,0.022147395,0.77474785,0.0001638062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17857826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17857826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15473266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9527328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128698615","doi":"10.26180/4669552.v1","title":"The abolition of the doctrine of extended common purpose","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Doctrine; Mistake; Common law; Strict liability; Context (archaeology); Criminal law; Complicity; Mens rea; Liability","score_opus":0.013939437200441083,"score_gpt":0.2934592675692236,"score_spread":0.2795198303687825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128698615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19386196,0.0077794627,0.22946039,0.037151475,0.0032364496,0.00032734757,0.00011610083,0.0003037575,0.5277631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94297814,0.0016633696,0.015940815,0.0066405246,0.0007741062,0.00016945672,0.00005151019,0.000077128505,0.031704962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886079,0.0031136,0.0007448417,0.0013978621,0.0045021623,0.0016335979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862366,0.0057263593,0.0013545726,0.002940299,0.0031375112,0.000604515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011175791,0.00037098755,0.00094676437,0.0013465463,0.002784781,0.0062800325,0.0025957045,0.0044082943,0.0022848719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021377444,0.0005366934,0.0015232771,0.0006358981,0.025244959,0.007985557,0.006652028,0.008116966,0.00073210767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102650065,0.000009359132,0.00036919594,0.000028401251,0.000007090975,0.00011462167,0.0009430203,0.0002781828,0.0003599858,0.9912333,0.0007375969,0.005908932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051523915,0.00020069079,0.0024735811,0.0006013273,0.00007198672,0.0006947035,0.0010815935,0.0029502157,0.0020076525,0.85987246,0.1298875,0.000106758605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008439137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00811826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011175791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004682578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010621154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059103966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128701368","doi":"10.26180/4669552","title":"The abolition of the doctrine of extended common purpose","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Doctrine; Mistake; Common law; Strict liability; Context (archaeology); Criminal law; Complicity; Mens rea; Liability","score_opus":0.013939437200441083,"score_gpt":0.2934592675692236,"score_spread":0.2795198303687825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128701368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19386196,0.0077794627,0.22946039,0.037151475,0.0032364496,0.00032734757,0.00011610083,0.0003037575,0.5277631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94297814,0.0016633696,0.015940815,0.0066405246,0.0007741062,0.00016945672,0.00005151019,0.000077128505,0.031704962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886079,0.0031136,0.0007448417,0.0013978621,0.0045021623,0.0016335979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862366,0.0057263593,0.0013545726,0.002940299,0.0031375112,0.000604515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011175791,0.00037098755,0.00094676437,0.0013465463,0.002784781,0.0062800325,0.0025957045,0.0044082943,0.0022848719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021377444,0.0005366934,0.0015232771,0.0006358981,0.025244959,0.007985557,0.006652028,0.008116966,0.00073210767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102650065,0.000009359132,0.00036919594,0.000028401251,0.000007090975,0.00011462167,0.0009430203,0.0002781828,0.0003599858,0.9912333,0.0007375969,0.005908932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051523915,0.00020069079,0.0024735811,0.0006013273,0.00007198672,0.0006947035,0.0010815935,0.0029502157,0.0020076525,0.85987246,0.1298875,0.000106758605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008439137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00811826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011175791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004682578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010621154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059103966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7130499867","doi":"","title":"A Statutory Response to Intrusion upon Seclusion:Does Australia provide a model for reform in England and Wales?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Tort; Legislation; Common law; Intrusion; Punitive damages","score_opus":0.07535171422748112,"score_gpt":0.39148942645558454,"score_spread":0.31613771222810344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7130499867","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20851582,0.004752138,0.010471158,0.41926757,0.0009109384,0.00038071282,0.00008075159,0.000061547566,0.35555932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8617701,0.0021164713,0.007346606,0.037491485,0.00018345543,0.0002578633,0.00003145837,0.00003151239,0.09077105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922616,0.0036642791,0.00031755786,0.00053699105,0.0014235647,0.0017960191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993747,0.0019127617,0.00083445664,0.00061477505,0.0014153203,0.0014756972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008748468,0.00019789832,0.00041296912,0.0006718968,0.0051426254,0.008078737,0.001275972,0.006875385,0.0053457324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015241047,0.00048803294,0.000572117,0.00058630056,0.013428305,0.0074236873,0.005282371,0.0069531696,0.000844403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018479554,0.00005538352,0.0013851322,0.000087318,0.0000051326147,0.0003288569,0.012977815,0.00035292836,0.00038922922,0.9642401,0.008249391,0.011910249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008536012,0.00043633397,0.022624725,0.0016989647,0.000050321283,0.0007179723,0.032792665,0.00425233,0.0009914406,0.30044624,0.63574535,0.00015821608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09719026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13633974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09719026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013822008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03427219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1932491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132860814","doi":"","title":"A Rudderless Regime: The United Kingdom&apos;s &quot;Enlightened Shareholder Value&quot; as a Model for the Duty of Loyalty in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Corporation; Duty; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Duty of loyalty; Legislature","score_opus":0.09071302602882096,"score_gpt":0.4095601957237712,"score_spread":0.31884716969495025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132860814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0758502,0.0027139722,0.0095701795,0.037318554,0.00025282564,0.00010319902,0.00013624583,0.00003335099,0.87402153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403642,0.000987552,0.0021186974,0.003219626,0.000041921732,0.00004047002,0.00002554399,0.000017404076,0.05318454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703467,0.00062577764,0.000050386883,0.000325729,0.0008639668,0.0010994467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890745,0.0002533854,0.00008269016,0.00010462928,0.0003854888,0.0002664718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015635785,0.00027841746,0.00031638713,0.00087243196,0.009870261,0.009487156,0.0013980456,0.0033867932,0.00478051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037509883,0.00031697948,0.00042251172,0.0009010985,0.014495116,0.0032468955,0.002826098,0.004553182,0.00041185043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004315681,0.0000041624235,0.00023256722,0.000004586962,0.000001065386,0.00003623148,0.00072587456,0.0002641595,0.000024786006,0.99563885,0.001410141,0.0016533335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009126168,0.0000453012,0.0053491043,0.0002710033,0.000046446927,0.00013064133,0.0063750343,0.009153923,0.0005002929,0.7278127,0.25009924,0.00012495568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9570127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9604131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08474885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08474885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062335003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6148988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132883421","doi":"","title":"A change in Canadian corporate governance philosophy: The importation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act into Canadian corporate governance","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Issuer; Corporate security; Control (management); Stakeholder; Agency cost; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.061586501263323594,"score_gpt":0.3544750053373577,"score_spread":0.2928885040740341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132883421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045907255,0.036670864,0.011838647,0.48090398,0.0042310967,0.00012605073,0.000371905,0.00010985808,0.41984037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76734746,0.029722642,0.015111753,0.070731014,0.0009253791,0.00006836915,0.00024433364,0.00011923655,0.11572978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98650867,0.0016797687,0.000249642,0.0008114523,0.008907857,0.0018426292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904142,0.0018185267,0.00040247722,0.00028043016,0.005913468,0.0011708975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066057453,0.00037335366,0.00035001207,0.0020795185,0.01215879,0.0091607105,0.0013151623,0.0033023453,0.002214095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011924917,0.0003928066,0.0004619307,0.003387183,0.018503355,0.003020856,0.0019650934,0.0062161884,0.00026664586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013126615,0.00001316828,0.0014181904,0.00009867305,0.000007257645,0.00014314147,0.00836556,0.000620129,0.0002266103,0.9069234,0.04845687,0.033713907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025485308,0.000026636842,0.0132175265,0.0004631351,0.000023542401,0.000119223085,0.005796539,0.0009039816,0.00039754942,0.067288354,0.91162723,0.00011071928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9911108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99260896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.179032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.179032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23373127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9522065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132886509","doi":"","title":"Directors Duties under the CBCA:Shareholder Theory versus Stakeholder Theory Consideration of Stakeholder Theory&apos;s Legal and Moral Supremacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder; Statutory law; Shareholder; Corporate law; Stakeholder analysis","score_opus":0.16590764551146792,"score_gpt":0.3954824350750255,"score_spread":0.2295747895635576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132886509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053561058,0.0062798313,0.05867087,0.12930499,0.00059916306,0.00017572877,0.00010872565,0.000061132,0.75123847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537346,0.0018992715,0.009072655,0.007459718,0.00026836598,0.000099600154,0.000024355655,0.000023557688,0.02741793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868875,0.004355063,0.0003543168,0.0010756345,0.00584932,0.0014780888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928722,0.004035498,0.0004908073,0.00044164713,0.0017186935,0.00044118616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013764836,0.00035884505,0.0005051233,0.0020679415,0.008762087,0.009722616,0.001911186,0.0050154855,0.0032002039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01361235,0.00033266706,0.00048920827,0.0016986706,0.04196638,0.0074083693,0.0029350675,0.005469918,0.00029236457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010393571,0.0000032157748,0.00011794015,0.0000072053194,5.907801e-7,0.000014677392,0.0011177196,0.000055000997,0.000032160464,0.99616003,0.00068455667,0.0018057781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014588523,0.000015580013,0.0020088642,0.00025851576,0.000011261766,0.000063882624,0.0038642343,0.0015705499,0.0004884097,0.92764497,0.06402507,0.000034090102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2558281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27284655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2558281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026381293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038776718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5086781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132913405","doi":"","title":"Horizontal application of fundamental rights in India","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Private law; Private rights; State (computer science); Autonomy; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.015513052789194225,"score_gpt":0.4038955415449337,"score_spread":0.38838248875573944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132913405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12519486,0.0010456535,0.011220385,0.0061070155,0.00008536352,0.00003293374,0.0000521659,0.00007520312,0.8561865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98765904,0.00033309526,0.0011955523,0.00041179857,0.00003067817,0.000027590571,0.000017246486,0.000012005635,0.010312923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543864,0.0011725548,0.0001672699,0.00042265383,0.0012961457,0.0015027139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765897,0.0009729206,0.0002499427,0.00063146587,0.00034542143,0.00014132124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023749368,0.00017041297,0.00029751167,0.0011193446,0.0038651344,0.005625435,0.0009027438,0.0013750414,0.0034451527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004028931,0.00030466617,0.0004983872,0.0017867908,0.017147698,0.002862032,0.0075334883,0.0034465755,0.00048199878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030991355,0.0000038146818,0.00018825661,0.000008655419,0.0000013211633,0.00004240355,0.001625296,0.00019962103,0.00011361921,0.99405247,0.00026470673,0.0034967207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017031321,0.000046910995,0.0047443877,0.00011028265,0.000014654234,0.00024204995,0.0041797506,0.0012030535,0.001189587,0.90475863,0.083458975,0.000034772438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022970825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016909499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022970825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006456784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007547234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046847403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132934352","doi":"","title":"Justifying the Line in the Sand: Remoteness in Canadian Tort Law","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Tort; Liability; Duty of care; Relation (database); Supreme court; Common law; Strict liability","score_opus":0.06692074647929303,"score_gpt":0.42777384352569975,"score_spread":0.3608530970464067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132934352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08263473,0.008723412,0.050118178,0.14356673,0.00055748504,0.00018066898,0.0003391617,0.000106067404,0.71377355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539231,0.0026703097,0.012432398,0.0064542764,0.00011546498,0.000041457173,0.00005564077,0.000034505698,0.024272867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942827,0.0013156474,0.00013227465,0.000494312,0.0024320034,0.0013431048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634784,0.0017356877,0.00021288727,0.00020172624,0.0012798074,0.00022218646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005224161,0.0005249232,0.00044861526,0.0029484255,0.016145637,0.008318013,0.0021209286,0.004869323,0.005134262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109428335,0.0004030704,0.00057539705,0.0027835392,0.030021437,0.004991798,0.0039810087,0.006037561,0.00029154457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040142136,0.000004790367,0.00039421173,0.000020046087,0.000002711355,0.00007881987,0.0023735692,0.000527815,0.000052343814,0.9884211,0.0032292237,0.004891371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020700303,0.000016292914,0.00549394,0.00042372372,0.000043755517,0.00011046107,0.00849208,0.0046580466,0.00043411143,0.8538809,0.12632228,0.00010375651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9562305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9672642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07861758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07861758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093564786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5704131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132940286","doi":"","title":"Fault and &apos;Reasonable Steps&apos;: The Troubling Implications of Morrison and Barton","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Fault (geology); Criminal law","score_opus":0.06220610343093899,"score_gpt":0.41522309363075693,"score_spread":0.3530169901998179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132940286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038208144,0.009045153,0.008536349,0.8817223,0.0017289147,0.000040082345,0.000115180876,0.00004778444,0.094943345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5915333,0.009678905,0.012038064,0.33900008,0.004920031,0.00030229118,0.00006403176,0.0001697538,0.042293552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98701406,0.00580012,0.000580865,0.0015433105,0.004014466,0.0010470882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.928285,0.059713922,0.002426215,0.002036936,0.006007094,0.0015307858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020747002,0.00051934324,0.0010460134,0.0015231422,0.008196488,0.0077704233,0.0030147603,0.021604443,0.009178096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08622781,0.0006346342,0.00069667335,0.0014764083,0.032629713,0.014217553,0.0039882227,0.02069742,0.0014210748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019096644,0.0000107477335,0.00017116171,0.000036671798,0.0000054188845,0.000108630906,0.0012761401,0.0001796771,0.0000141294895,0.92424697,0.069832005,0.0040992675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043756292,0.000009851238,0.00035989255,0.00017214412,0.000011264853,0.00012417951,0.0010738516,0.000672272,0.000060162547,0.9274002,0.070042625,0.000029829978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041755095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0488057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041755095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009492969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111305965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10972196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132985053","doi":"","title":"The Weakest Link? Evaluating Private Nuisance Liability in Ontario&apos;s Environmental Law Context","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Nuisance; Tort; Liability; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Common law; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.09164700245362063,"score_gpt":0.4391386111396704,"score_spread":0.3474916086860498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132985053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60999936,0.0019417987,0.0027155313,0.035457093,0.00007272619,0.00013795926,0.00068142643,0.000011603078,0.34898254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99241394,0.00055654795,0.00068843726,0.0007434998,0.000020760344,0.000019381963,0.000061618906,0.000004152211,0.005491682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958553,0.0007520095,0.00014171959,0.00031754447,0.001517923,0.0014155257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911259,0.0037007206,0.0013837,0.0003997735,0.0026410227,0.0007489116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033226002,0.00021797547,0.00041175488,0.0019994436,0.009312216,0.00716031,0.0015497399,0.0022806528,0.0039181532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011780624,0.00029805506,0.0003538698,0.0031693713,0.014798742,0.003206844,0.0025946256,0.001942303,0.00013243376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064906206,0.000051641742,0.065363355,0.0001604042,0.000044708442,0.001356532,0.01894078,0.003004742,0.0006909411,0.8892771,0.00837149,0.012673423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006901497,0.00012783123,0.32018518,0.00092873216,0.00026902638,0.00050338794,0.16790582,0.011167771,0.0012029809,0.35131443,0.14612722,0.00019857052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9719986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1017685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1017685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0720553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7383856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132992230","doi":"","title":"Indeterminacy and the Canadian Supreme Court’s Approach to Corporate Fiduciary Duties&quot;","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Supreme court; Rebuttal; Mistake","score_opus":0.06044256719250178,"score_gpt":0.33229891107892556,"score_spread":0.27185634388642377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132992230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0316648,0.006081678,0.0062297555,0.12349147,0.0010396689,0.0001524445,0.00058299064,0.00010205613,0.83065516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77803093,0.0025366868,0.0042651924,0.059694823,0.0004832776,0.00015750143,0.00018594947,0.000086606095,0.15455897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860746,0.0014838129,0.00034574664,0.0013437201,0.0063535767,0.0043985606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449146,0.0015446665,0.00018150358,0.00032108233,0.0028757465,0.000585534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061374055,0.0006353565,0.00068761816,0.0024949256,0.026192069,0.015916016,0.004992826,0.013222891,0.0049709734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01572349,0.0008804086,0.0010511406,0.0025117241,0.021149315,0.002702722,0.0029717165,0.01254792,0.00044804838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006063422,0.000005730493,0.00033365254,0.000012481098,0.000004789842,0.000114722934,0.000960977,0.00044774625,0.00006273457,0.98078626,0.014611985,0.0026528228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008897579,0.000028289434,0.008286838,0.00054178666,0.00008636767,0.00024360784,0.0034788072,0.007064401,0.00071193837,0.46394986,0.5151529,0.00036628262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98746127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99140733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1509991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1509991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17169204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9847207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133010827","doi":"","title":"Judicial activism in the law of negligence","year":2006,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Criticism; Supreme court; Judicial opinion; Common law; Liability; Private law; Judicial review; Tort","score_opus":0.03230427509076785,"score_gpt":0.40677136392613544,"score_spread":0.3744670888353676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133010827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04697301,0.012251708,0.016732572,0.24761531,0.0010427192,0.0000466781,0.00003583589,0.000079870406,0.6752223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9087575,0.0026435931,0.0021377981,0.035727903,0.0027677538,0.000077779296,0.000021774718,0.000047947735,0.04781787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98917854,0.00489655,0.00038504743,0.0017516349,0.0024132954,0.0013749035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885844,0.009344535,0.0006198505,0.00056985556,0.00057816243,0.00030318374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009138922,0.00026268425,0.00039175875,0.0009421217,0.0072330376,0.0101439,0.001540757,0.012955694,0.003581199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014676522,0.00032014106,0.0007647204,0.00066639995,0.0323379,0.0058190906,0.0041697235,0.012240329,0.0003930664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033821468,0.0000043721093,0.00009167228,0.000008462914,0.0000017593263,0.000057791236,0.0017367664,0.000059980066,0.000101227044,0.9936273,0.0024172545,0.0018900253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027085383,0.000031104526,0.0011610244,0.00018740297,0.0000194973,0.00011450263,0.00206783,0.0008364443,0.00073364517,0.83643174,0.15836181,0.000027965056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008270644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01075666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012955694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005917186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038288918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048331857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133045566","doi":"","title":"Efficiency of market mechanisms in mutual fund trusts","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mutual fund; Fund administration; Corporate governance; Investment fund; Sovereign wealth fund; Target date fund; Closed-end fund","score_opus":0.03123356861846071,"score_gpt":0.38183202634101093,"score_spread":0.3505984577225502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133045566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48745945,0.0037665318,0.2020029,0.020400364,0.00015229831,0.0005379734,0.00024850777,0.00031124978,0.28512064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98577917,0.00045438748,0.007962909,0.00015636839,0.00007282028,0.00012358592,0.000030915486,0.000018663344,0.005401131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821233,0.008877475,0.0012654021,0.0016432989,0.004127807,0.001962737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93228227,0.03742157,0.0153049175,0.007932711,0.005168852,0.0018895789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020153284,0.00031678163,0.0010023458,0.0027047612,0.0027724986,0.012020708,0.0018960284,0.0038484843,0.009003977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08320262,0.0006701043,0.0010309068,0.0017776001,0.011420784,0.018128362,0.0052576615,0.0025933636,0.00078143383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022829625,0.000017148634,0.0007809332,0.000022294205,0.00001089543,0.0000388928,0.00039172822,0.0015022049,0.000115187206,0.99112076,0.00040984462,0.0055673625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085386324,0.000039007984,0.0012553257,0.000056526715,0.000025989555,0.00008496361,0.00041874396,0.011164327,0.00059157657,0.97933096,0.006927918,0.000019296343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035220778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017593607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020153284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007895648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005216851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106582046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133053065","doi":"","title":"Private Oppression: An Account of Motive and Purpose in Anglo-Canadian Private Liability","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deakin University; GlaxoSmithKline","keywords":"Tort; Liability; Strict liability; Normative; Element (criminal law); Oppression; Action (physics); Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.02716538649718372,"score_gpt":0.37280450266574555,"score_spread":0.34563911616856186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133053065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08030879,0.002467595,0.008819652,0.02065429,0.0001507115,0.00007868298,0.00009081212,0.000033304495,0.88739616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97395384,0.0011890751,0.0015377572,0.0012164346,0.00004891442,0.00003491068,0.000028521408,0.000029002647,0.021961551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537766,0.00100239,0.00008854388,0.00030103378,0.0016201232,0.0016102272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802774,0.0005286014,0.000181137,0.00012944463,0.0008086055,0.00032458905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026082438,0.0006316746,0.00043587567,0.0024562832,0.01933599,0.009853228,0.002270177,0.003502077,0.003597443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033272852,0.0004620798,0.000657061,0.0022136192,0.04278722,0.0051974044,0.0053301244,0.0037632803,0.0003103225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030061742,0.000004117092,0.0003009226,0.0000109041475,0.0000017271865,0.00008480298,0.014675941,0.00012919755,0.00003118246,0.9829518,0.00077161845,0.0010346702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030771193,0.000015619353,0.007218922,0.00038508055,0.00006470684,0.0004993802,0.0692405,0.0033290035,0.00023862119,0.70241576,0.21644847,0.00011319274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9072984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92470497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092701614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07910601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06704956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57395697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133060407","doi":"","title":"Social investing by private trustees","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Impact investing; Statutory law; Statute; Prudence; Social contract; Socially responsible investing; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.04090524341204895,"score_gpt":0.4136877056162896,"score_spread":0.37278246220424066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133060407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3132369,0.0022022065,0.048111297,0.055705268,0.00043216173,0.00023754383,0.00009842542,0.00008558251,0.57989055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686391,0.0005070588,0.003615839,0.0022898652,0.00009862507,0.00006427744,0.000018433735,0.000016095739,0.024750678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785665,0.011561491,0.0010344487,0.001849341,0.0038850822,0.0031030355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560421,0.020064875,0.008316541,0.006763873,0.0057994677,0.0030131403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018708777,0.00020842056,0.00030662405,0.0009998069,0.004655883,0.008029207,0.0010529537,0.002730667,0.006808521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040489748,0.00028308688,0.0005844457,0.0008661456,0.014150199,0.008633927,0.0059598875,0.003047231,0.00067446235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002235792,0.000037839996,0.0050022113,0.00004446535,0.000013813992,0.0001246995,0.008488523,0.00023703241,0.00027519985,0.96549356,0.002941699,0.01731865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058912323,0.0003046392,0.013671842,0.00065645494,0.000091600305,0.0006429545,0.02304801,0.0043170946,0.0029231517,0.68032056,0.27386236,0.00010237939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00867962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010160839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018708777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006358317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009056407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0989427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134582103","doi":"","title":"<em>Chevron</em> Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Chevron (anatomy); Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Statute; Normative; Judicial review; Doctrine","score_opus":0.02708630920573562,"score_gpt":0.30014090627914086,"score_spread":0.27305459707340524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134582103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2643837,0.004582793,0.0017107411,0.014994252,0.00028394838,0.000058318463,0.0003252378,0.00011962725,0.7135414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226405,0.0015188002,0.0009453208,0.0060049035,0.000041748306,0.000042578704,0.00021518703,0.000120059645,0.06847081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969103,0.0017971562,0.000075300326,0.00031687837,0.0004443387,0.0004560719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587846,0.0018204749,0.0006980673,0.0005450464,0.00083849643,0.00021946096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002366922,0.00015519992,0.00024987973,0.0011505017,0.0038297044,0.0058005275,0.000533465,0.0012644371,0.019630661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007625073,0.00012725132,0.0002601118,0.0023422563,0.0025682615,0.0024131518,0.0017622991,0.0016072653,0.0018553688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023299103,0.00013690867,0.022060327,0.00048116012,0.000076921955,0.0013641043,0.074166305,0.0011136096,0.0028181016,0.586274,0.110804036,0.2004715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026672249,0.00008396113,0.0667415,0.00054642116,0.000049121816,0.00070206,0.046408318,0.00073070393,0.002690364,0.012811865,0.86915004,0.000058972324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041399997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0564259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041399997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040245536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025312281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08231801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135437313","doi":"","title":"Trusteeship in the context of inheritance law","year":2022,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Trust law; Civil code; Settlor; Conflict of laws; Private law","score_opus":0.015056511246893682,"score_gpt":0.2885719136744647,"score_spread":0.27351540242757105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135437313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19840646,0.012704039,0.01136673,0.04776276,0.0003399993,0.00008072018,0.0000802404,0.000037188995,0.7292219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299276,0.0012099993,0.00038489138,0.00034735067,0.000060674774,0.00001159206,0.0000064897076,0.0000065803615,0.004979659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913549,0.0049641393,0.0003119934,0.00059713825,0.0012555536,0.0015163503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99114263,0.0054293144,0.0010037763,0.0004374066,0.0010354095,0.0009513996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066161104,0.00018395341,0.00042309088,0.0017128624,0.008728761,0.012992607,0.0010459597,0.0033417237,0.004613437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012510436,0.00033025726,0.00037517367,0.002716193,0.03554,0.009010171,0.005872266,0.0037753936,0.00033191533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021618812,0.0000040054924,0.00017273308,0.000010047131,0.0000012128256,0.00007808615,0.004965854,0.00014203718,0.0000133374515,0.99349916,0.00035166123,0.00075979694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018683244,0.000025447938,0.0019232299,0.00037346964,0.000018970008,0.00021917472,0.023783443,0.001568176,0.00010969334,0.8770423,0.094880395,0.00003707543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06871836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050093483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06871836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026692726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01538455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19367021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135496905","doi":"","title":"Trust as a tool for intergenerational asset transfer","year":2024,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Asset (computer security); Fiduciary; Legislator; Civil code; Statute; Subject (documents); Notional amount","score_opus":0.01226943070035474,"score_gpt":0.2976332550615098,"score_spread":0.28536382436115504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135496905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05967989,0.007850728,0.050760232,0.02460008,0.00044228174,0.000108519846,0.00011812163,0.000111364556,0.8563287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954934,0.0022738324,0.0044846493,0.00045274562,0.00009331723,0.00004286936,0.000031695734,0.000029877847,0.03765699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695456,0.0016950462,0.00010841174,0.00027833213,0.0005558137,0.0004077775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599165,0.0016875087,0.0006207571,0.0005855285,0.0006286371,0.0004859473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029449442,0.00023061222,0.00029284132,0.0014112345,0.0028216615,0.008655516,0.0008115287,0.0021952696,0.011625912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051079877,0.00022900091,0.0003987943,0.0019014368,0.016179552,0.008901038,0.005087579,0.0023637142,0.001667707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042102793,0.000007804892,0.00027543204,0.000027298474,0.000002091904,0.0000839917,0.002545215,0.00018567104,0.00005571704,0.9897737,0.0011518303,0.005887099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010825292,0.000057297584,0.0015699449,0.00047534608,0.000020358957,0.0005663224,0.0072858776,0.0016722004,0.00045923892,0.78877723,0.19907606,0.000029361185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054421234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004380708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011625912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007800573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004936912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05659741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135497850","doi":"","title":"Trust in the context of inheritance law","year":2023,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Trust law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Civil code; Settlor; Private law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.01683646614468567,"score_gpt":0.2909882681745832,"score_spread":0.27415180202989753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135497850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09997471,0.013746647,0.010009314,0.03951966,0.00029648218,0.000061134735,0.000079853584,0.000029673465,0.83628255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890386,0.0017757528,0.0005738345,0.0005324897,0.000083574116,0.000014067107,0.000011203516,0.000007502607,0.007963034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951062,0.0027385768,0.00017048376,0.00034751167,0.0008307633,0.00080645684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534947,0.002780671,0.00050772325,0.00028243777,0.00061717886,0.0004625916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003930179,0.00019559654,0.00038070767,0.0013812574,0.0059899297,0.0102093825,0.0006365418,0.002455088,0.0045774197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007860513,0.00024428475,0.00030248825,0.0019872314,0.033572946,0.0069725127,0.0043794373,0.0031101864,0.00035406047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017355744,0.000002930186,0.00011170714,0.000010764302,0.0000011110706,0.000058198926,0.0027227337,0.00013648167,0.000013501472,0.995478,0.0005524894,0.0009104186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001058855,0.000016593753,0.0010352717,0.00033232322,0.000009494466,0.00012623495,0.0091011375,0.00089101115,0.00006558477,0.910895,0.077497475,0.000019277768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044897463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025888516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044897463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019473499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011500253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14129078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135523655","doi":"","title":"Foundations of charity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Voluntary sector; Key (lock); Public sector; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.10390108542466969,"score_gpt":0.3762906497931371,"score_spread":0.2723895643684674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135523655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037115358,0.007866229,0.011373953,0.04361968,0.0010384867,0.000052490177,0.00006662818,0.00005755157,0.93221337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7633979,0.012246136,0.008015878,0.0098117795,0.0013623821,0.0003136232,0.00013468225,0.0001256421,0.20459192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927262,0.0038070742,0.00019826337,0.0006408418,0.0016297483,0.0009979501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993212,0.0031462417,0.0005257957,0.0008490288,0.0012984431,0.0009684001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005795178,0.0003972453,0.00047150257,0.0023090248,0.010280293,0.012659393,0.0013007201,0.004136963,0.012915887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009188187,0.0004435824,0.0004185614,0.0025801295,0.039471038,0.008838018,0.0093439035,0.006275,0.0024224056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011435644,0.0000028408358,0.000027975893,0.000016258482,4.6619704e-7,0.000011652238,0.0007324601,0.00003659226,0.000005232128,0.9930565,0.0040261415,0.0020829155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004326334,0.0000074627196,0.00018598656,0.00020700866,0.0000014375189,0.000084662104,0.0013764327,0.00013962947,0.000030784617,0.7491219,0.24883376,0.0000065756226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067233113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074914116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012915887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011891092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110244835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08627635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135540265","doi":"","title":"The Specifics of Use of Trusts in Business Relations","year":2020,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Corporate governance; Position (finance); Express trust; Business relations; Czech","score_opus":0.021925409365078575,"score_gpt":0.27248608815249364,"score_spread":0.25056067878741506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135540265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07358187,0.035255656,0.053626526,0.027836384,0.0007052495,0.00016875248,0.0001584042,0.000114194096,0.808553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97332156,0.008133437,0.0036883322,0.0007058393,0.000207609,0.000062986524,0.000035984947,0.00003894858,0.013805345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889643,0.005872193,0.0007719168,0.00095363375,0.002014477,0.0014234756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99294126,0.0035868268,0.0009713087,0.0010123247,0.00092071656,0.00056763313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052775,0.00032997807,0.00046722897,0.0026030752,0.0046644253,0.011195189,0.0007634931,0.0026605115,0.00415976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010785646,0.0005201535,0.000631408,0.003743016,0.03242902,0.012897864,0.0053325696,0.0037020098,0.0006120355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004606584,0.0000041250482,0.00038123876,0.000047415422,0.0000046530154,0.0000939412,0.0065747765,0.00015187035,0.000053583182,0.98697543,0.00057523214,0.0051331064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011154025,0.000036778718,0.003851358,0.00069598696,0.000024091565,0.0009494932,0.0132802,0.0007844873,0.00036130406,0.7493464,0.23059903,0.000059719052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013593994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007501196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013593994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011347257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052745272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082330465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135563487","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary","year":2016,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.010581450857008269,"score_gpt":0.28072293313189517,"score_spread":0.2701414822748869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135563487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008259155,0.005594094,0.008676915,0.018421778,0.0023899465,0.000104611296,0.00045807305,0.00034300954,0.9557526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56161547,0.0036325408,0.0057727424,0.0109785795,0.0009998132,0.00019747483,0.00055094104,0.00052280206,0.4157296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907357,0.0019475558,0.0005440686,0.0019666585,0.0032453397,0.001560688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940653,0.0015162504,0.0006067342,0.0012016132,0.0020437557,0.00056630914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649217,0.000489215,0.00059095706,0.0019757317,0.006424126,0.008751189,0.0013940033,0.003596689,0.03839782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019424714,0.00043285982,0.0007798679,0.0017320894,0.011290294,0.0074123405,0.0053362227,0.0057834485,0.013866607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017123155,0.000008595116,0.00041617785,0.00006207132,0.000006106259,0.000059431768,0.003605711,0.00007761327,0.0001308837,0.92929935,0.048642784,0.017674167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006685405,0.000020330956,0.0010146892,0.00020561327,0.000008320882,0.00017345756,0.0009908838,0.0001185057,0.00033276438,0.043546777,0.95355433,0.000027700693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018347206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017863447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03839782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009872083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007352725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135564440","doi":"","title":"The concept of trust in Czech law","year":2006,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Settlor; Trust law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil code; Construct (python library); Legislature; Principal (computer security); Public law; Salient","score_opus":0.008045058971648375,"score_gpt":0.2717096777789822,"score_spread":0.26366461880733383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135564440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08453328,0.023173673,0.06315369,0.02888346,0.0009004353,0.00022130596,0.00019408065,0.0001272704,0.7988128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98560333,0.0035910148,0.0033509948,0.0006237957,0.000110581874,0.000053637235,0.000030186056,0.000019895182,0.0066165277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98969716,0.0036908777,0.0009339657,0.0009553348,0.003234884,0.0014876825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515545,0.0023368672,0.00062837475,0.0005527812,0.0009154769,0.0004110071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068888976,0.0003941243,0.0005249875,0.0035902252,0.0054311506,0.014093876,0.0010020809,0.0023422753,0.0023272908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016011296,0.00044059684,0.0007334411,0.0041907625,0.036819253,0.0120114405,0.0063225077,0.003824738,0.0003584259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033422457,0.0000019229365,0.00013806422,0.000023510467,0.0000022367822,0.000025954789,0.0018459457,0.00017857656,0.00003728461,0.99494135,0.00040412805,0.0023977912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014461061,0.000022998256,0.0017111811,0.00033545724,0.000016281167,0.00020454945,0.004025644,0.0012992745,0.00019865074,0.908257,0.08386525,0.00004935489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02872015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014217406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02872015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020812161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014520594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15100348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135580114","doi":"","title":"Trust in Czech Law","year":2012,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Settlor; Trust law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil code; Construct (python library); Legislature; Principal (computer security); Public law","score_opus":0.013000078444193276,"score_gpt":0.28591332764989863,"score_spread":0.27291324920570537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135580114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05698667,0.019220924,0.021994114,0.034322776,0.00092926767,0.00019201767,0.0001833656,0.000123498,0.8660473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97874856,0.0037858018,0.0018877792,0.0014716781,0.0001325367,0.000046261557,0.00004493969,0.000029840887,0.013852538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017805,0.0029439868,0.000843262,0.0010936605,0.0030456157,0.0018954695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949555,0.0022571576,0.0005277585,0.0006034959,0.0011367906,0.00051928265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006962411,0.0003599164,0.00049113535,0.002592747,0.008107089,0.015943658,0.00091493095,0.0028086544,0.004662938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020865476,0.00039441092,0.00070701516,0.0033582873,0.027037248,0.009109853,0.0065838653,0.004105995,0.0006508187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004043741,0.0000026702528,0.00017874275,0.000030156942,0.0000028738314,0.000047025278,0.002211538,0.00017324473,0.000034166755,0.9924029,0.0014115624,0.003501057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026165368,0.000025518892,0.0027669738,0.0005554682,0.00002266792,0.00032104726,0.0056172977,0.0010858026,0.00026659243,0.7337463,0.25549504,0.00007123509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05259746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031351138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05259746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025068114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021083375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18188274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135601079","doi":"","title":"Trust as a legal implant","year":2022,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Subject (documents); Czech; Express trust; Institution; Trust law; Common law","score_opus":0.008915523639897133,"score_gpt":0.28695681895675035,"score_spread":0.27804129531685323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135601079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05854323,0.010889013,0.019795854,0.037230056,0.0010084511,0.00006842158,0.00014314389,0.00008579313,0.87223595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739993,0.003031949,0.0011629056,0.00085529796,0.00019013644,0.000018814499,0.000033096425,0.000028617858,0.0206797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601364,0.0015119361,0.00019307248,0.0003998518,0.0012530274,0.0006285455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509746,0.0022063672,0.0005766845,0.0004775638,0.0011506976,0.0004912704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034061135,0.000196739,0.0003052424,0.0013400001,0.0034237176,0.010271918,0.0006021707,0.0015643858,0.008389858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008924621,0.00019494488,0.0003817682,0.0016155757,0.01735029,0.0077692065,0.0037749973,0.0030905013,0.0010139418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036592346,0.0000045025713,0.0002163549,0.000024593066,0.000001977959,0.00002765819,0.002441524,0.0001382191,0.000044921042,0.9908069,0.0019373354,0.0043524457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001556976,0.00006150817,0.0031744554,0.0011361804,0.000030355019,0.00034246652,0.011226127,0.001738971,0.00062138535,0.581048,0.40055245,0.000052590865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013378089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008496657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013378089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012740305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01111774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092437744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135617662","doi":"","title":"Trust","year":2015,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Civil law (Civil law); Natural person; Legal research","score_opus":0.01633639927026074,"score_gpt":0.30156296348355976,"score_spread":0.285226564213299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135617662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009742881,0.0036040654,0.02326489,0.025004601,0.0012528475,0.0002033895,0.00047209093,0.00023446676,0.9362207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77918434,0.0052313474,0.007078708,0.0057832915,0.00063448405,0.0001917218,0.0006092993,0.0002454611,0.20104133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844413,0.0038808263,0.0012220219,0.0024666188,0.005734374,0.0022548474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838298,0.0034056255,0.0014965537,0.0033238549,0.005892446,0.0020517043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068793553,0.00039446147,0.00059552764,0.0017488153,0.0058872667,0.01303488,0.0015235114,0.0030487115,0.03401987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03219643,0.00039377727,0.0007190052,0.0021304484,0.010992359,0.009430132,0.006199388,0.0033596107,0.010983332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014801942,0.0000109969105,0.0007489708,0.00012454603,0.000017573684,0.0001291315,0.003409023,0.0001981876,0.0001523084,0.943817,0.027729569,0.023647737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000121748435,0.000028136401,0.0015503553,0.0003903554,0.000020746362,0.00048783817,0.0030442062,0.0004087169,0.00023869048,0.19877914,0.7950006,0.000039003553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016256766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012787263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03401987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010280914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015622597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135633293","doi":"","title":"Procedural Aspects of a Trust Fund","year":2025,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Express trust; Construct (python library); Procedural justice; Position (finance); Procedural law; Subject (documents); Blind trust; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.01598128931746604,"score_gpt":0.29303982776235904,"score_spread":0.277058538444893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135633293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17879663,0.0020165013,0.07102899,0.008392515,0.00021021534,0.00019651171,0.00014438687,0.00010267751,0.7391115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98775685,0.0003180391,0.0028503959,0.0001603815,0.000040620576,0.000037295802,0.000025482257,0.000019139554,0.008791764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98934865,0.0038450263,0.0008983605,0.001042947,0.0031814582,0.0016835653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918978,0.0029572728,0.001317349,0.0012298662,0.0019520675,0.0006455974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071734474,0.00022166692,0.00028819704,0.0022554423,0.004184834,0.014178583,0.0013597284,0.0019341718,0.004412172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019574093,0.00028643978,0.0005732704,0.001842084,0.021775026,0.0073706666,0.004946789,0.0024027936,0.00046868913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050140115,0.000004368068,0.00044972668,0.000016727994,0.0000035555752,0.00005605852,0.0025869645,0.00033625044,0.00008402846,0.9935679,0.00029727953,0.0025921753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017232185,0.0000533338,0.008479558,0.0004898361,0.00006402619,0.0005045097,0.012859369,0.0033386948,0.0009971104,0.81832683,0.15480421,0.00006514457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0187506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009605482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0187506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011512945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012697056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08353269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135657142","doi":"","title":"The Trust Funds","year":2014,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Civil code; Negotiation; Subject (documents); Convention; Legal profession; Civil law (Civil law); Legal research; Legal person","score_opus":0.009774942542821494,"score_gpt":0.2748570547296508,"score_spread":0.26508211218682926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135657142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025889315,0.0072133434,0.0013746761,0.04855727,0.0062176473,0.00012658632,0.0047884462,0.00041077466,0.9287224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043771576,0.006276514,0.00078329147,0.0050182245,0.0015234398,0.00013022691,0.0029698,0.000350882,0.9391762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676347,0.00042040026,0.0002544237,0.0005561609,0.0013288897,0.0006766423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961808,0.0004715887,0.00036534216,0.0004998882,0.0017380832,0.0007443902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020051217,0.0006023309,0.00052087684,0.0021145712,0.0028495234,0.011134349,0.0012176035,0.0031364753,0.25438166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012261079,0.0003339696,0.00044868136,0.0029544863,0.0010527335,0.0056307483,0.0036579466,0.0034102353,0.11870563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040973824,0.000010967376,0.0004272921,0.00016393642,0.000009822583,0.000097287826,0.00045667755,0.00007367268,0.000100476725,0.2776172,0.6694248,0.051576905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028655422,0.0000030237366,0.00021666502,0.00006816568,0.000002178086,0.00004021427,0.00008642331,0.000015812513,0.000034450764,0.0018843411,0.99764305,0.0000026898465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019886173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015175974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25438166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008097885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013505384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8509914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135665742","doi":"","title":"Negligent Misstatement in Canada: Young v Bella","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04459314029682378,"score_gpt":0.35868689653215113,"score_spread":0.31409375623532737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135665742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22837004,0.015098036,0.00070680917,0.404558,0.0019916184,0.00043207774,0.0038046732,0.00016479357,0.3448739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69603676,0.006697314,0.0007382543,0.16139996,0.00044348708,0.00014915499,0.00060591137,0.00012319161,0.13380595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907392,0.00052365474,0.0002995293,0.0003828576,0.0021983136,0.005856378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858224,0.0035152184,0.0007109152,0.00025091713,0.003873993,0.005826586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040141293,0.00063650444,0.0011211407,0.002515289,0.024021639,0.007362678,0.00565039,0.029239224,0.015654624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025653526,0.0013036832,0.0009599096,0.004065042,0.0041118423,0.00254864,0.004298449,0.015916172,0.00089965214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057376496,0.00033346843,0.063756436,0.0006865699,0.00029333483,0.007804885,0.020389162,0.0021728557,0.000674691,0.20837586,0.6459032,0.049035784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005520258,0.00027244978,0.19273403,0.002775203,0.001228111,0.0033899096,0.06735882,0.0038985948,0.0016946961,0.04249605,0.6828715,0.0007286601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99895716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10188634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10188634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4336807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7392406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135684803","doi":"","title":"The role of trust in designing the supply chain contracts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Supply chain risk management; Supply chain management; Chain (unit); Outsourcing; Payment","score_opus":0.03139395950967959,"score_gpt":0.3031886819832714,"score_spread":0.2717947224735918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135684803","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13224635,0.001008113,0.58259547,0.025444275,0.0003820395,0.00070807926,0.00013717673,0.00022274052,0.25725576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616296,0.00026783737,0.029776167,0.0003285277,0.000051230487,0.0001680424,0.000017139751,0.00006648206,0.0076948777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758563,0.015935961,0.0014432222,0.0013396982,0.003405941,0.0020188973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89805716,0.081725605,0.0055098273,0.005549163,0.0065275375,0.002630727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025565237,0.0003993861,0.0006708928,0.0016665331,0.005320254,0.0138782,0.0017338392,0.005749609,0.01049834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104648136,0.0012061519,0.00083314657,0.0017322083,0.012075075,0.023301207,0.0043214345,0.004914347,0.0011354777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033834516,0.00003008908,0.0011942603,0.00006664931,0.00001582906,0.00024785576,0.0032880346,0.0045605954,0.00022929993,0.97918564,0.00094272074,0.010205098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034015535,0.000055248216,0.0006786033,0.0001898849,0.000031225456,0.00016256205,0.0033934035,0.024011618,0.00069137115,0.9534856,0.017222691,0.000043783075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010400925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007023272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025565237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007061431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012749311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13520354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135702105","doi":"","title":"Legal Status of the Settlor of a Trust","year":2024,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Trust law; Express trust; Property (philosophy); Legal status; Testamentary trust; Blind trust; Czech","score_opus":0.009299594627023075,"score_gpt":0.27740495567232093,"score_spread":0.26810536104529786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135702105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13077715,0.0028513814,0.01692573,0.019495549,0.00045638357,0.00021591608,0.0002056662,0.00008584406,0.82898635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826257,0.0005713357,0.0016202147,0.0005178063,0.00006356856,0.000048439157,0.000059881724,0.000019964104,0.014472961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847536,0.004925526,0.0014799453,0.0015819411,0.004822086,0.0024368186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98266786,0.0060218573,0.0018248085,0.0017433257,0.0063177594,0.0014243246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008737253,0.00018858821,0.00041714596,0.0023243146,0.0063462183,0.016274422,0.0013534254,0.0030437778,0.0076994062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028749427,0.0003732615,0.00041659654,0.0018697423,0.020658508,0.007569808,0.0048349705,0.0048220707,0.0010439701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073871056,0.000009074847,0.00062034844,0.00002623276,0.0000024198932,0.00013335161,0.0070261587,0.00010239753,0.00020292547,0.985487,0.0015916732,0.0047910465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035811743,0.00006567957,0.0102265775,0.0014588218,0.000048200953,0.00070117164,0.034011804,0.0017677653,0.0015723086,0.63357157,0.31641898,0.00012128562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040091533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01856246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040091533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016742803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0191999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12147808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135762557","doi":"","title":"Trust in Czech Law","year":2012,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Settlor; Trust law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil code; Construct (python library); Legislature; Principal (computer security); Public law","score_opus":0.013000078444193276,"score_gpt":0.28591332764989863,"score_spread":0.27291324920570537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135762557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05698667,0.019220924,0.021994114,0.034322776,0.00092926767,0.00019201767,0.0001833656,0.000123498,0.8660473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97874856,0.0037858018,0.0018877792,0.0014716781,0.0001325367,0.000046261557,0.00004493969,0.000029840887,0.013852538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017805,0.0029439868,0.000843262,0.0010936605,0.0030456157,0.0018954695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949555,0.0022571576,0.0005277585,0.0006034959,0.0011367906,0.00051928265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006962411,0.0003599164,0.00049113535,0.002592747,0.008107089,0.015943658,0.00091493095,0.0028086544,0.004662938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020865476,0.00039441092,0.00070701516,0.0033582873,0.027037248,0.009109853,0.0065838653,0.004105995,0.0006508187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004043741,0.0000026702528,0.00017874275,0.000030156942,0.0000028738314,0.000047025278,0.002211538,0.00017324473,0.000034166755,0.9924029,0.0014115624,0.003501057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026165368,0.000025518892,0.0027669738,0.0005554682,0.00002266792,0.00032104726,0.0056172977,0.0010858026,0.00026659243,0.7337463,0.25549504,0.00007123509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05259746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031351138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05259746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025068114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021083375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18188274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135768391","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the fraud exception: a critique of United City Merchants v Royal Bank of Canada forty years on","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Explore Bristol Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Payment; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.1605157355948501,"score_gpt":0.423482860637135,"score_spread":0.26296712504228487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135768391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015758112,0.013041766,0.0013089909,0.80738366,0.00351559,0.000053799853,0.00022321931,0.0000624923,0.15865238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29605213,0.0067460327,0.0009648203,0.5745114,0.0049351123,0.00011468337,0.00008798053,0.00028612866,0.11630168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97242963,0.0047452715,0.00090147334,0.0034889309,0.008966551,0.009468155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96352756,0.01813973,0.0014932195,0.0011072383,0.012178124,0.0035541751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019325819,0.0010759567,0.0021277992,0.0046749944,0.045617126,0.031286784,0.00950401,0.07206176,0.0073771165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06361397,0.0015911622,0.0016122496,0.0050827204,0.05056522,0.010605225,0.007483258,0.06387457,0.0010685424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030834795,0.00001572627,0.0006053444,0.000061348874,0.000033610733,0.00030297472,0.01575363,0.0003114094,0.00006674712,0.7531303,0.22449519,0.005192796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087272165,0.000022955257,0.0030274729,0.0013239868,0.00017848688,0.00012941296,0.018419636,0.00071506575,0.00039548115,0.1486821,0.82672405,0.00029416094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9728147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9783524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9728147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11341258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21991144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8228697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135839263","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary","year":2016,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.010581450857008269,"score_gpt":0.28072293313189517,"score_spread":0.2701414822748869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135839263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008259155,0.005594094,0.008676915,0.018421778,0.0023899465,0.000104611296,0.00045807305,0.00034300954,0.9557526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56161547,0.0036325408,0.0057727424,0.0109785795,0.0009998132,0.00019747483,0.00055094104,0.00052280206,0.4157296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907357,0.0019475558,0.0005440686,0.0019666585,0.0032453397,0.001560688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940653,0.0015162504,0.0006067342,0.0012016132,0.0020437557,0.00056630914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649217,0.000489215,0.00059095706,0.0019757317,0.006424126,0.008751189,0.0013940033,0.003596689,0.03839782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019424714,0.00043285982,0.0007798679,0.0017320894,0.011290294,0.0074123405,0.0053362227,0.0057834485,0.013866607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017123155,0.000008595116,0.00041617785,0.00006207132,0.000006106259,0.000059431768,0.003605711,0.00007761327,0.0001308837,0.92929935,0.048642784,0.017674167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006685405,0.000020330956,0.0010146892,0.00020561327,0.000008320882,0.00017345756,0.0009908838,0.0001185057,0.00033276438,0.043546777,0.95355433,0.000027700693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018347206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017863447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03839782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009872083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007352725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135866723","doi":"","title":"Testamentary trust fund","year":2025,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Trust law; Express trust; Settlor; Czech; Blind trust; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.017867166140279223,"score_gpt":0.2966443882088608,"score_spread":0.2787772220685816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135866723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028500512,0.0023919505,0.0039576525,0.005990207,0.00020444184,0.00011354457,0.00040227454,0.00007698182,0.95836246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85211235,0.0014745113,0.0016479784,0.00065360474,0.00007003109,0.000068558,0.0001946184,0.00003205236,0.14374638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804676,0.0003288176,0.00010080283,0.00031001025,0.0007087689,0.0005048998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806505,0.00035175952,0.00023808764,0.00018210545,0.0007997615,0.0003631802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012539995,0.00015728861,0.00016511708,0.0011975933,0.0035297207,0.008371016,0.0006154372,0.001446445,0.017456252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064312066,0.0001346182,0.00022466942,0.0013889035,0.0040713847,0.0029101216,0.002077124,0.0013513473,0.0017779851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006165296,0.0000042931906,0.0007769583,0.000024304029,0.0000022705744,0.00005405569,0.0011350405,0.0001302969,0.0000640814,0.9758705,0.009712888,0.012219198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009721682,0.000015796893,0.006537516,0.0003214829,0.000011133364,0.00024011593,0.0024120107,0.0005093566,0.0003470587,0.06269891,0.9268674,0.000029366849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15481399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14154781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15481399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018462209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016258147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3078258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135894989","doi":"","title":"Use of the Fiduciary Fund in Commercial Relations","year":2024,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Doctrine; Work (physics); Subject matter; Commercial law; Capital (architecture)","score_opus":0.032097655301282946,"score_gpt":0.30156032203556954,"score_spread":0.2694626667342866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135894989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075990245,0.026910393,0.0052175107,0.010222772,0.00018700847,0.000045797722,0.00008471255,0.00003583532,0.8813057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836075,0.0048070895,0.0008058375,0.00045699583,0.000056814173,0.00001729342,0.00002137616,0.000019879752,0.010207143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891973,0.0047882465,0.0005709685,0.00094705576,0.0029170632,0.0015793289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396163,0.0034328692,0.00072734756,0.0006237376,0.0009108181,0.00034350305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063242484,0.00023896784,0.0004166011,0.0033466741,0.006935886,0.019809088,0.0009843601,0.0026210183,0.0043482883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012651809,0.00036049262,0.00038444853,0.004891764,0.024066953,0.010009322,0.004823027,0.0027898494,0.00065308687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069385305,0.0000035211485,0.0004681097,0.000036303576,0.0000035742016,0.00009036627,0.0071446756,0.00010780815,0.00006769412,0.9842762,0.001237459,0.006557408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016471078,0.000036415146,0.009549114,0.0016575394,0.000037227193,0.00087358686,0.028700884,0.0010638818,0.0007130216,0.44541794,0.5118374,0.000096461874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040090505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029424306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040090505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020054942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008163048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14550948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135904557","doi":"","title":"Relationship between trust and inheritance law","year":2025,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Trust law; Beneficiary; Settlor; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Express trust; Probate","score_opus":0.022372027254942528,"score_gpt":0.2978588077478868,"score_spread":0.2754867804929443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135904557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36693603,0.0044160616,0.017632816,0.026706526,0.000121886886,0.00006986944,0.00018615458,0.00003754411,0.58389306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966163,0.00046220716,0.0002991313,0.0001719107,0.000018641796,0.000007223719,0.0000121017565,0.0000034698974,0.0024089944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952899,0.0024672758,0.0002204902,0.00038662337,0.000922304,0.0007135208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96558636,0.022315018,0.0060057617,0.0011348284,0.0031829448,0.0017750154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003733206,0.00012046732,0.00029448676,0.0014086363,0.0020861567,0.005577727,0.0005594997,0.0012823213,0.011623135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024614975,0.0001504691,0.00023971772,0.00201331,0.011565599,0.004922249,0.0029159773,0.0020031158,0.00047461648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015519088,0.000028770093,0.0088478075,0.000045880308,0.000012700687,0.00018396141,0.0038178083,0.00046963268,0.00004463885,0.9780271,0.0012313938,0.007274639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022726259,0.000054284625,0.02620186,0.00045558365,0.000036455156,0.00041506495,0.013507456,0.002963317,0.00014676346,0.914125,0.042032983,0.000038469923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015396322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072323526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015396322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073289266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004042669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05317533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135930419","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary in comparative context","year":2021,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Trust law; Jurisdiction; Legislator; Common law; Flexibility (engineering); Voting trust; Settlor","score_opus":0.022011029618724528,"score_gpt":0.31177498765302947,"score_spread":0.28976395803430494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135930419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048107143,0.01804658,0.0040621553,0.012869867,0.00026155572,0.000022110571,0.000093841816,0.000015907903,0.91652083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860351,0.003513845,0.0008363064,0.000605968,0.00013988931,0.000024957391,0.000043360655,0.00001847549,0.008782162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933513,0.0045596357,0.00014006758,0.0005073971,0.00066351006,0.0007781195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481577,0.0035926725,0.00037714583,0.00032897978,0.0006199787,0.00026550482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060250065,0.0002345429,0.0005475985,0.0048642172,0.008177752,0.01005937,0.00096459355,0.002167333,0.010880748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008750242,0.00019044238,0.00025430837,0.0067720506,0.032876354,0.009309568,0.004544211,0.0023106083,0.00053227064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017958575,0.0000014297889,0.000084785584,0.000011572805,9.784237e-7,0.000018752085,0.0033941348,0.000025328056,0.0000055498554,0.9946977,0.0005789674,0.0011790484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008984869,0.00002142782,0.0034318261,0.0005803497,0.000012813918,0.00022434899,0.028311014,0.00025208533,0.00012636889,0.60591775,0.36109316,0.000019799552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015176401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015167139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017263766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017263766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003514106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12525803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139498018","doi":"","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Asset (computer security); Duty; Investment (military); Duty of care","score_opus":0.027577810855619375,"score_gpt":0.320333969471667,"score_spread":0.2927561586160476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139498018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000838491,0.004334796,0.004398426,0.008335413,0.008288006,0.00018993745,0.0036580428,0.0011714374,0.9687855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004621942,0.003736657,0.0026717854,0.0039799716,0.0018390543,0.0001206959,0.0035733778,0.00048892514,0.9789675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858093,0.00015817578,0.00007759818,0.00033515177,0.00069299113,0.00015517439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984432,0.00027129625,0.00007829294,0.0002017549,0.0007759744,0.0002295196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007763784,0.0009647944,0.00081528985,0.0016267032,0.002025556,0.0070207953,0.0019191279,0.0028802003,0.4662213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003963072,0.00042374193,0.00076842913,0.0018205356,0.0010776925,0.0045873746,0.0030235772,0.0028990696,0.34339273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028470256,0.000037647278,0.00026390603,0.00018547967,0.0000039722195,0.00009786189,0.00035650426,0.00014369808,0.0002701899,0.04040047,0.86446226,0.09374947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017295549,0.0000069175994,0.00013587673,0.00007508135,9.254586e-7,0.00006284892,0.000084754545,0.000025850082,0.000038203576,0.0025238625,0.9970408,0.000003166519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003364049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041542468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53377867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021351653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024942246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76137054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139623890","doi":"","title":"Chevron Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Deference; Agency (philosophy); Statute; Statutory law; Normative; Doctrine","score_opus":0.028384357854748715,"score_gpt":0.30291955057845726,"score_spread":0.2745351927237085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139623890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12490859,0.0048493203,0.0026398457,0.010093616,0.0005656654,0.00008979725,0.00027155213,0.00016468728,0.85641694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7586072,0.0020982528,0.0015072472,0.007349728,0.00011518523,0.00008698775,0.00022165487,0.00019126442,0.22982244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944971,0.0025061152,0.00016640004,0.0010508243,0.0009270796,0.0008523903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925333,0.003160034,0.0010657038,0.0012025329,0.0016188588,0.00041959717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030053987,0.00024254066,0.00033345484,0.0014920428,0.005070021,0.0074556204,0.00087747205,0.0020201413,0.040103186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012569876,0.00021645695,0.00044650518,0.0022610312,0.002753821,0.002644568,0.003193723,0.0025182194,0.004578543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014916722,0.000086343796,0.009902765,0.00032793873,0.000055761517,0.0011201287,0.03393736,0.0005570058,0.0016908173,0.7125291,0.08125046,0.15839317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002281178,0.000074456984,0.013664527,0.0003666876,0.00003675361,0.0005505211,0.012493778,0.0003703147,0.0012991771,0.010511819,0.96057606,0.000033025528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017597415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025658343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040103186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034973528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031521746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13415855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145359356","doi":"","title":"Interests of Corporation and Remedies of Stakeholders in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04945477166895739,"score_gpt":0.2725458619694975,"score_spread":0.22309109030054008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145359356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85803556,0.0016857476,0.0005615937,0.020416,0.000049322094,0.000080115635,0.0007808695,0.000030995503,0.11835971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98451555,0.00023783332,0.000100542406,0.00062426616,0.000005753357,0.000006881705,0.000068017354,0.000004213407,0.014437012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99241215,0.0006181004,0.00019835532,0.00043110197,0.002587252,0.0037530398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98187363,0.004232363,0.0014236594,0.00026236632,0.006725933,0.0054820026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026273783,0.00017072084,0.00037193796,0.0028563018,0.014209322,0.0076621724,0.0016550369,0.00308999,0.0061717755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017205697,0.00028673047,0.00031474268,0.00392249,0.0029073555,0.0015123455,0.002356801,0.002475989,0.00023876037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006420312,0.00037304466,0.42489618,0.00022666257,0.00014920229,0.0036933469,0.056301963,0.0054331413,0.0014411742,0.35550344,0.04573637,0.10560339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012037301,0.00020974316,0.4899632,0.000440612,0.00022857253,0.0007299736,0.20001286,0.009508941,0.0026302317,0.015350876,0.28047982,0.00032479863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99309444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99706095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10993409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10993409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15543726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7976314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155367086","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3936","title":"Is Illegality a Defence to Restitutionary Claims?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Presumption; Unjust enrichment; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Damages","score_opus":0.036064644835670075,"score_gpt":0.37980429649223807,"score_spread":0.343739651656568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155367086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05836642,0.012707074,0.034386463,0.30844897,0.002457485,0.00009822349,0.000113281836,0.00014567943,0.58327633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8859155,0.005693822,0.00639446,0.045715034,0.005543959,0.00023994129,0.00010822997,0.00012576203,0.05026334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871681,0.0037951919,0.0007072071,0.0024012295,0.0034948175,0.0024333475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726327,0.016906029,0.003214762,0.0041567683,0.0021546984,0.0009350068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013020557,0.0005529942,0.0012402295,0.0022681195,0.0076745637,0.013760066,0.004003351,0.02509227,0.0074670343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034073375,0.00070723175,0.0020536508,0.0013271696,0.07284011,0.022437617,0.010377628,0.01742263,0.001954689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062575305,0.000007979839,0.000194342,0.000026370803,0.00000408181,0.00015248523,0.0011821499,0.000039375733,0.00006380569,0.9950872,0.0014476656,0.0017883923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033017954,0.00003888941,0.00042120198,0.0003360691,0.00001319022,0.0005376403,0.0012948527,0.00039901104,0.00025053674,0.9100672,0.08657474,0.000033638746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032952214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025217757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02509227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033001269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059926244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06886011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155400550","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3935","title":"Looking through Trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Property (philosophy); Welfare; Subject (documents); Distribution (mathematics); Real property","score_opus":0.03262382887769831,"score_gpt":0.3527279788952945,"score_spread":0.3201041500175962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155400550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05478993,0.011683471,0.055412933,0.114201576,0.001460305,0.00012311744,0.0002394135,0.000200401,0.7618889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9071633,0.0052454905,0.0059575937,0.009929801,0.00043381102,0.00006316522,0.00009664542,0.0001471264,0.07096313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919115,0.0036645446,0.000412521,0.0009733259,0.0015923749,0.001445724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840916,0.007052583,0.0022838137,0.0020108814,0.0028731076,0.0016880416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007976573,0.0003560542,0.00046613347,0.0017119527,0.008473229,0.012490405,0.001236611,0.0055545005,0.019430974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024915747,0.00041992043,0.0007600833,0.0017460587,0.022493983,0.027848251,0.007160761,0.005927157,0.0017745314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050917965,0.0000040274895,0.00057940924,0.00004269693,0.000004714822,0.00015192015,0.0057988414,0.000078254685,0.000034853838,0.98042244,0.006672427,0.0062053567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008536666,0.000024518833,0.0010385576,0.00049610337,0.000020438949,0.00046855008,0.012341726,0.00052215985,0.00017459257,0.6848128,0.30006358,0.000028502789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022503091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018463703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022503091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008785601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069577014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06500304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162021074","doi":"10.82308/54357","title":"Liberté, responsabilité et utilité : la bonne foi comme instrument de justice contractuelle","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Economic Justice; Good faith; Normalization (sociology); Faith; Bad faith","score_opus":0.05838018296388806,"score_gpt":0.3588620645891531,"score_spread":0.300481881625265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162021074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049679644,0.0073954933,0.05249676,0.04526506,0.00047924876,0.00011393322,0.00016779729,0.00009424143,0.8443078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8907072,0.0026519448,0.011695865,0.0024656663,0.00018164705,0.00007035128,0.000044711513,0.000051224953,0.0921314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943626,0.002151947,0.00013247164,0.00047354956,0.00195506,0.0009242892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967283,0.0012820024,0.00024999527,0.00038488928,0.0009821905,0.00037265665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062782895,0.0003547078,0.00035941956,0.001201778,0.0057071573,0.0093991,0.0009999812,0.0027146125,0.006788987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063627926,0.0002731195,0.00035268918,0.0013018593,0.03491047,0.004909392,0.0025053967,0.0034919658,0.00074274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037572895,0.0000046488503,0.00027388224,0.000013158251,0.0000016893393,0.000028758604,0.0034561162,0.00012238181,0.000088570065,0.98901063,0.0013239762,0.0056725536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018501298,0.00003582212,0.005892631,0.0003359432,0.000014337397,0.00019746729,0.0069465446,0.001716052,0.0004859064,0.56342626,0.4208713,0.000059311806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46068522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46883878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46068522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028212957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026383448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91600746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162214203","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvxkn57g.22","title":"UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE AS APPLIED TO THE BLOCK","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03491203451588563,"score_gpt":0.3054422386308007,"score_spread":0.2705302041149151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162214203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039783474,0.0042647016,0.22272736,0.0051807184,0.00091431197,0.000081590646,0.00016764834,0.0001271818,0.76255816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5623135,0.0068294764,0.07926369,0.0022800062,0.001593664,0.00071161106,0.00019728206,0.00041484163,0.34639594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986167,0.0006863551,0.000060556213,0.0001511706,0.0003791664,0.000105966334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843603,0.0011020476,0.000062383944,0.00016680502,0.00017845325,0.00005431322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015862279,0.00061075325,0.0007378254,0.0014218322,0.0025876518,0.0046605105,0.0007855229,0.002071967,0.012401969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034528181,0.00049754936,0.00063244934,0.0012746583,0.011448682,0.0059107216,0.0020174321,0.0035663128,0.0027707734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.254757e-7,6.86787e-7,0.0000019696183,0.000004277116,3.2526592e-7,0.000003121893,0.000047196787,0.00007270373,0.000013411093,0.9984884,0.0005595723,0.0008073648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012808489,0.0000023476418,0.000007208758,0.0000096057165,0.0000010028906,0.000013749676,0.00003226406,0.0003811039,0.000053956588,0.97957957,0.019915583,0.0000023343362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019674243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015196885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012401969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027652662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018969859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041488707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164413310","doi":"10.3735/9781935306436.book-part-018","title":"Positive Team","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Action (physics); Freedom of information; Legislation","score_opus":0.026137163622791934,"score_gpt":0.29402832560592246,"score_spread":0.2678911619831305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164413310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009053168,0.00010370361,0.0013324713,0.0032078184,0.0013368772,0.0000642917,0.00010882244,0.00016855536,0.99277216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008610718,0.00009608808,0.0005643746,0.0017000043,0.00015372457,0.00006459741,0.000111073736,0.00011795783,0.9885815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728584,0.0004995391,0.00007336249,0.0004905379,0.0010759915,0.00057473296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761945,0.00020446483,0.00009536959,0.00024109635,0.0008919311,0.00094768085],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014825742,0.000711978,0.00048527494,0.0011599316,0.006438938,0.006653427,0.0016697,0.0023177986,0.37977678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043631857,0.0004605984,0.00052153337,0.0009005981,0.002272298,0.003920903,0.006593178,0.0035087783,0.17480794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056444358,0.000087128086,0.00035917776,0.00006863892,0.0000051737484,0.00009238191,0.001096062,0.000109914414,0.00019126848,0.16684286,0.7490083,0.0820827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013134443,0.000026453527,0.0003214292,0.0000552599,0.0000026674522,0.000056322187,0.00070008694,0.00008238799,0.00008079462,0.010824298,0.98782957,0.000007621086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008095572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0178165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37977678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037274926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059001287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8846731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164896162","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2009.12556393","title":"Exchange and Sacrifice.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.019622864472873817,"score_gpt":0.28539237517528887,"score_spread":0.26576951070241506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164896162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022182402,0.010603534,0.002714976,0.016815504,0.00053229416,0.000020155465,0.0000781314,0.00003244551,0.96698475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43745095,0.009449683,0.0034155587,0.013410409,0.0016148296,0.00018267092,0.00015260297,0.000094046176,0.53422934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986388,0.00048123454,0.000051318224,0.0002697281,0.00034199396,0.00021691645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936765,0.0002248534,0.000051456667,0.00014353899,0.00015580263,0.000056732904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018293704,0.00058754126,0.00035482264,0.0007536936,0.0038136316,0.0041241855,0.00091699103,0.00404444,0.024704456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003678509,0.00025052187,0.0003422528,0.00072853384,0.009808021,0.0058833603,0.0023510945,0.004327802,0.0041008247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006014723,0.0000048736783,0.00006602547,0.000012067808,0.0000023345324,0.00001946926,0.00029886674,0.000040711337,0.00002298248,0.97962373,0.0143529605,0.0055498714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011191593,0.000013793043,0.0004964412,0.00012825213,0.000007998942,0.00011961254,0.0005511341,0.0001992475,0.00016509127,0.6725083,0.32579136,0.0000075993344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060712663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008852855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024704456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024722796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001982183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08264464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165112071","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0024","title":"Theology in <i>Vincent v Lake Erie</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Relevance (law); Damages; Property (philosophy); Private property; Economic Justice; Natural law; Property rights; Obligation; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.00755479912293219,"score_gpt":0.25438042034466074,"score_spread":0.24682562122172855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165112071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018528277,0.014253454,0.0019578736,0.0814109,0.0032243803,0.000026034855,0.00007820045,0.00007187172,0.880449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54715663,0.0042876727,0.0008537609,0.03023833,0.0015858015,0.000070217175,0.00006728375,0.0001252989,0.415615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988261,0.00038976825,0.000023376686,0.00016510343,0.00021422736,0.00038145017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978894,0.00007536566,0.000031004103,0.000021901995,0.000045253415,0.000037538088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073852285,0.00033523058,0.00020859428,0.00045541467,0.0057908967,0.0062956153,0.000822832,0.0038852643,0.0052339067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014930961,0.0003108389,0.00023578733,0.00048486944,0.009331085,0.0035234904,0.0027083496,0.0059453906,0.0008320473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011188879,0.000003949869,0.00007477147,0.000014707097,0.0000014630484,0.00014284349,0.00467115,0.00003158767,0.00010098091,0.93217164,0.060778376,0.0019973507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006333193,0.000009267231,0.00046532066,0.00009493355,0.0000030314543,0.00018893498,0.0033124073,0.00006928987,0.00018241337,0.041136615,0.9545167,0.000014798559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07915056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088304855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07915056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008058598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031861796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15737969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W748150488","doi":"","title":"The Reason to Reverse: Unjust Factors and Juristic Reasons","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Wonder; Odds; English law; Commonwealth; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03293329871804214,"score_gpt":0.30397240801429154,"score_spread":0.2710391092962494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W748150488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012178287,0.011646664,0.008848269,0.27634433,0.0025977406,0.000043149674,0.000072808165,0.00007565034,0.6881931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87971926,0.0036586167,0.0030266342,0.06924739,0.0032008002,0.00010692318,0.00005009353,0.00017446718,0.040815935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835023,0.009180283,0.0004993698,0.0018242981,0.003117399,0.0018764489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973422,0.019348744,0.0010824559,0.0025707185,0.002689872,0.00088632543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017398018,0.00045756405,0.000563483,0.0012570969,0.008706597,0.012236704,0.0025939385,0.010688377,0.011544559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030309534,0.0003360938,0.00048993254,0.0011566117,0.0851442,0.01271332,0.005677311,0.014212641,0.0013648019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020652537,0.0000038013486,0.000049117563,0.000009630174,8.4218334e-7,0.00003888815,0.0012527732,0.000017871795,0.0000063918246,0.99407285,0.0036765437,0.00086926733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007650929,0.0000065500735,0.00019007451,0.00012318332,0.0000031022937,0.00014730536,0.0029912204,0.00013447179,0.000053625103,0.877773,0.11855987,0.000009890647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00420648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035462878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017398018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071794167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055607096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09201062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W75378226","doi":"","title":"Costs - solicitor's retainer on 'no win, no fee' basis - meaning of 'win' - solicitor not entitled to recover excess of costs over amount paid on settlement - no consideration for variation of oral retainer.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Meaning (existential); Retainer; Project commissioning; Law; Publishing; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Engineering; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022976804210440745,"score_gpt":0.26624837598308987,"score_spread":0.24327157177264913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W75378226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02877431,0.0029894686,0.0068345293,0.098271005,0.0040150257,0.00031100915,0.0009635644,0.00010706509,0.857734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.717263,0.0010315689,0.003537878,0.099539675,0.0018380947,0.000711921,0.00034184774,0.00011867014,0.17561732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854172,0.0042472286,0.0012723957,0.0015696137,0.0047920938,0.0027015004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585235,0.0016415382,0.00034501188,0.0004725757,0.0014086078,0.00027996485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007917671,0.00070172624,0.0006475973,0.0011460012,0.0075323833,0.008284649,0.0024899938,0.015268998,0.006904849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01741713,0.000732495,0.00079954666,0.0010323623,0.016333882,0.005786322,0.00453648,0.010406084,0.0016634911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002553327,0.000019803216,0.0003065859,0.00005554113,0.000006247371,0.000114122995,0.0026488795,0.00006662973,0.00021439159,0.95029444,0.0435574,0.0026904223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012746378,0.00026860432,0.0047791903,0.0006399049,0.00006074213,0.00057061436,0.012498048,0.00060953444,0.00094437244,0.25417244,0.7251464,0.00018281116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038049117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07409466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038049117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059502623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009034843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07565528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77113317","doi":"","title":"Prescription à la recherche du temps: In Search of Past Time (or Recognition of Things Past)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Civil code; Possession (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Doctrine; Medical prescription; Argumentative; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Law; Code (set theory); Law and economics; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13500951575192421,"score_gpt":0.3610980711182106,"score_spread":0.22608855536628636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77113317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02754382,0.012535199,0.05027414,0.26439878,0.0016094594,0.000087271605,0.00024096602,0.00020105815,0.6431092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988295,0.002851089,0.011575208,0.014063697,0.0005873694,0.000120954166,0.00006523003,0.00017784318,0.07172908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98798555,0.0070274123,0.000391679,0.0012860511,0.0022553536,0.0010538917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98796344,0.005325531,0.0007874931,0.0014401173,0.0037748623,0.0007086079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015440441,0.00040030247,0.00091518025,0.0015321422,0.01062209,0.014435072,0.002608574,0.006267978,0.005708527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019868456,0.00038052734,0.0007204322,0.0019348189,0.06813393,0.0143585205,0.004465352,0.008236418,0.0011398434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053383037,0.0000022761408,0.000083844105,0.00001547801,0.0000014932822,0.000025921108,0.006245406,0.000043226966,0.000041765205,0.9887905,0.0027475096,0.0019972895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025102032,0.000025051644,0.0006939085,0.000391384,0.000012565789,0.00015910991,0.016560907,0.00078237057,0.0005525213,0.6035556,0.3771638,0.0000777691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27714843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28875655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27714843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03008756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030047469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55107045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W774677500","doi":"","title":"Convergence of Civil Law and Common Law in the Criminal Theory Realm","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Homicide; Mens rea; Civil law (Civil law); Mistake; Common law; Political science; Public law; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.06407487041117542,"score_gpt":0.33057153375594917,"score_spread":0.26649666334477373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W774677500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14891538,0.027271606,0.068638146,0.07247061,0.0005681474,0.000095105184,0.00008686456,0.0000909589,0.6818631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97964716,0.0044525056,0.0075574657,0.0014516382,0.0005785093,0.00011189989,0.00004824537,0.000047027555,0.006105482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98477167,0.009129815,0.0003744614,0.0014283598,0.0033847939,0.00091086945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704076,0.022071974,0.0013326056,0.0021659057,0.0029558325,0.0010660387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0114969,0.0003856141,0.001344398,0.010014578,0.005465842,0.012465328,0.0016339568,0.0042346325,0.00864542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02929632,0.0004038167,0.00055667723,0.0073465183,0.056739897,0.027107494,0.010314675,0.0067597837,0.0006378538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041756894,0.0000070003443,0.00018792792,0.000011158369,0.0000012607248,0.000018165183,0.001592062,0.00006489743,0.000011910474,0.9955843,0.00021333726,0.002303758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057161856,0.000008702603,0.00075026066,0.00010599211,0.0000018614616,0.000044312033,0.0018809692,0.00061671867,0.000039581475,0.986863,0.009678019,0.000004840006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004126966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002890322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012465328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009051088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058636623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06567055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77695280","doi":"10.29173/alr161","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Law; Freehold; Energy law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Environmental law","score_opus":0.16396172225428923,"score_gpt":0.34957115516568765,"score_spread":0.18560943291139842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77695280","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009035477,0.6907953,0.0008399107,0.17867166,0.0037078697,0.00003379982,0.00016548068,0.000047806374,0.11670267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1656408,0.66808814,0.0018329772,0.11366484,0.013500429,0.000045739132,0.00037082934,0.000052761174,0.0368035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98908466,0.0020018516,0.0005659091,0.0012122937,0.0055710548,0.0015641517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641525,0.017590012,0.0030011125,0.00064711086,0.013499294,0.0011098982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013022347,0.00027511248,0.00057505333,0.004957708,0.005121824,0.009116833,0.0025786452,0.009350191,0.0062616873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028674541,0.0007253941,0.000515717,0.008867205,0.0063645896,0.0033560535,0.0013290384,0.007703079,0.00094697636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004885807,0.00010201209,0.0017724105,0.0016889231,0.000048443006,0.001147594,0.0038693957,0.0007815741,0.0006114739,0.38688943,0.3575872,0.24545261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016699485,0.000021926244,0.004218693,0.0010632575,0.000028446037,0.00033954982,0.0013232445,0.00013607922,0.00017936064,0.0110241,0.9816098,0.000038797927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3069157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51651496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6930843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028410433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03370571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61025846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W779004620","doi":"","title":"The constitutional position of the British Civil Service : an assessment of the impact of managerialism on the notion of 'the servant of the Crown' via a case study of HM Prison Service","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Managerialism; Prison; Civil service; Service (business); Position (finance); Political science; Public administration; Civil servant; Law; Business; Politics; Public service","score_opus":0.014282913686567447,"score_gpt":0.2942793011667655,"score_spread":0.27999638748019806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W779004620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89284205,0.002459319,0.0003849239,0.0066550253,0.000090085945,0.000049654907,0.00004104337,0.000006803283,0.09747125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246395,0.0007340794,0.00014781645,0.00041315367,0.000015876783,0.000017261984,0.000011767575,0.000007036242,0.0061891163],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941095,0.003758851,0.000077694756,0.00018049935,0.00077255914,0.0011008836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954852,0.0029363618,0.00037629504,0.00013999469,0.00060427404,0.00045785584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004032786,0.00027474397,0.00040232335,0.0015013025,0.014301596,0.0066886265,0.0015390781,0.0021528024,0.0052789696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006843853,0.0002490646,0.0001565232,0.0032626882,0.013674279,0.0030149107,0.0033419493,0.0026038638,0.00047492713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012913691,0.00020101434,0.013736228,0.00027992894,0.000011492529,0.006325996,0.8003505,0.00028219065,0.0010572158,0.14818658,0.0069794687,0.022460181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008928535,0.000086418455,0.022027109,0.00029662676,0.000009756487,0.00052945135,0.9201523,0.00030532325,0.00022204923,0.0027128484,0.05362736,0.00002179577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33029735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5656013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33029735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026295055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066343313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6567496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80674782","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004155633.i-342.69","title":"Chapter 13. Awarding Damages for Distress and Loss of Reputation in England and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Reputation; Underpinning; Distress; Test (biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03126637737145373,"score_gpt":0.3005026928216856,"score_spread":0.2692363154502319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80674782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008810755,0.037201237,0.0011182197,0.046802144,0.0025489852,0.00012500075,0.00057967624,0.00007884998,0.9027352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13940708,0.02176332,0.0014370839,0.014207958,0.0005527142,0.000061831255,0.00019659568,0.00008011853,0.82229334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592173,0.00025985853,0.0001205748,0.0002708058,0.002638347,0.000788554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828243,0.00044236932,0.00005583282,0.00004560116,0.0010109975,0.00016288237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022743542,0.0006171592,0.0004825148,0.002367083,0.016252115,0.009453108,0.0021577114,0.005078695,0.015374535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004633908,0.0003903967,0.0004886318,0.0031919111,0.008206243,0.0018130193,0.0016422239,0.0045754774,0.0012145084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009965563,0.000010902359,0.0004032792,0.00012196522,0.000005238897,0.00027267128,0.0053046467,0.00037047733,0.00017294017,0.74438775,0.23063497,0.018305203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005105786,0.0000060674006,0.002125081,0.00031153442,0.0000107142105,0.00010704381,0.003168964,0.00018612365,0.00016937185,0.017447323,0.9764147,0.000048079208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98696715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14901319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14901319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11436591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98702407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80682572","doi":"10.29173/alr53","title":"The Presumption of Resulting Trust: &lt;i&gt;Nishi v. Rascal Trucking Ltd.&lt;/i&gt;","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.022217817924208606,"score_gpt":0.30669397883086713,"score_spread":0.2844761609066585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80682572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014523164,0.0030375305,0.0027833863,0.08331691,0.0006500794,0.00010868616,0.00064699096,0.00014683418,0.8947865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6177057,0.0022951434,0.0025349595,0.05277844,0.0004979709,0.00017877448,0.00038268807,0.000089629626,0.32353666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929045,0.0008732805,0.00030360854,0.000872498,0.0032658027,0.001780395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407506,0.0025293403,0.00037273558,0.00048238077,0.0021438021,0.0003966125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044434853,0.0005709343,0.00043603542,0.0010065036,0.006270684,0.0065306188,0.0030106297,0.018519312,0.020805126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018790249,0.00064536073,0.0007475851,0.0007959279,0.0050006662,0.0028336006,0.0021132866,0.007840253,0.0039828448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078684665,0.00003062919,0.0013529514,0.00013512737,0.000032445358,0.0006338232,0.0016936829,0.00027351538,0.0007385049,0.79410183,0.19039558,0.010533184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001617612,0.000118448304,0.0105119385,0.0011123035,0.00025695455,0.0007734192,0.0028072551,0.002308213,0.0057368088,0.211538,0.7644952,0.00017965438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21382792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30792835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21382792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010497875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020653568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4251666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W84451555","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the rule of law and administrative justice from managed to neoliberal capitalism in the United States : evidence from the case of temporary labor migrant regulation (1942-2011)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Wenner-Gren Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Capitalism; Labour law; Neoliberalism (international relations); State (computer science); Economic Justice; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.11397792736215698,"score_gpt":0.34012123615313944,"score_spread":0.22614330879098246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W84451555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8957416,0.00111234,0.0008469641,0.02432646,0.00008871152,0.00002801553,0.000049399274,0.000008103264,0.077798545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958377,0.00030909167,0.00013920285,0.0021068123,0.000027365168,0.000016195076,0.000016570466,0.000004832409,0.0015421876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938877,0.002477428,0.0002337054,0.0008226842,0.0010595305,0.0015188254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816632,0.012065212,0.002653982,0.0017144091,0.00136768,0.00053545024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013539356,0.00012800233,0.00033055994,0.0010864845,0.011198288,0.008582389,0.0014526428,0.0044556456,0.0027020536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020681022,0.00031152778,0.0004542947,0.0015615047,0.029487431,0.00585913,0.005868726,0.006880916,0.0002005952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013990833,0.0002088847,0.032763775,0.00008358531,0.000038271904,0.0010275882,0.1774819,0.00065966207,0.0005672971,0.75156564,0.0072712805,0.028192306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019134414,0.00032677763,0.21217889,0.0015599006,0.00026165968,0.00047976343,0.35297444,0.002430225,0.0037035064,0.19961959,0.22606951,0.00020438703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08948806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105583414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08948806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00959486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011259669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17793435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W847367042","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004155633.i-342.14","title":"Chapter 3. Unjust Factors, Juristic Reasons and Contracts in Anglo-Canadian Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Common law; Supreme court; Political science; Tort; Liability; Restitution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.058868301768965556,"score_gpt":0.3079200727247036,"score_spread":0.24905177095573805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W847367042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034709347,0.028396871,0.0018020596,0.009462896,0.0006621685,0.000038023016,0.000174164,0.000033866007,0.9559589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116351366,0.028966852,0.0027422165,0.007182278,0.00052032067,0.000057979243,0.00021049728,0.00007680409,0.84389174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993369,0.000068810135,0.000009819944,0.000047842273,0.00037008675,0.00016656255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997315,0.000058965306,0.000012200831,0.000010158365,0.00015643447,0.000030721334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004778919,0.00045587288,0.00017832979,0.0013050198,0.0061067063,0.0044426015,0.0006708874,0.001218014,0.014535592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000741349,0.00017441141,0.0002197903,0.0018722196,0.005211538,0.0014979815,0.00077367714,0.0019704276,0.0013698661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033059443,0.000008188911,0.00021637557,0.00006498036,0.000001657543,0.000057141024,0.0043282504,0.00015272114,0.00011914279,0.90717417,0.071195096,0.016678978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011146036,0.000001948781,0.0007017539,0.00015859366,0.000002248844,0.000055815148,0.0013768225,0.000106946136,0.00008604286,0.03260889,0.96489257,0.000007259891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8092836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8984307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19071639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037150413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02860217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3836791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W850793605","doi":"","title":"In Search of a Convenient Forum: Evolving Jurisdictional Considerations for Employers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business law international","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Serbian; Officer; Jurisdiction; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03803923766815409,"score_gpt":0.3435531110876365,"score_spread":0.3055138734194824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W850793605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020337064,0.0029831706,0.001856623,0.8922762,0.006057149,0.00012640997,0.000076353535,0.00014880595,0.07613827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44976214,0.0039112987,0.004989654,0.39800286,0.005626086,0.00060132745,0.00021753252,0.00046440717,0.1364247],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715318,0.012066077,0.0007321563,0.0017305671,0.003563739,0.010375583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9226344,0.021834318,0.002342489,0.0016186537,0.006715461,0.044854604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034463517,0.0004957228,0.0005298902,0.0013733557,0.047491398,0.028575346,0.0053774095,0.023597559,0.07622983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05700269,0.0008561319,0.0005480876,0.0011662785,0.010558412,0.027073208,0.031491134,0.020143433,0.00865712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079839076,0.0003445445,0.005590446,0.00022606416,0.000007740287,0.0026760548,0.07945251,0.00013003804,0.0006930829,0.1369971,0.69364744,0.0801551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029653222,0.00008981301,0.002571524,0.0009893843,0.000006624471,0.0004707849,0.21450193,0.00018250127,0.0001284532,0.018358614,0.76259756,0.000073170464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018330954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05123174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07622983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009817031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033185996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25501424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W854993281","doi":"","title":"Fiducia in the New Romanian Civil Code","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Civil code; Beneficiary; Law; Romanian; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.03976938050743144,"score_gpt":0.3157958408618545,"score_spread":0.2760264603544231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W854993281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02063863,0.013062581,0.041180316,0.008243851,0.0019293254,0.00015613763,0.00073022366,0.00009497939,0.913964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7392849,0.012253371,0.04413483,0.0035900418,0.0024404076,0.0006517868,0.0012745908,0.00016768013,0.19620247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630094,0.0013932176,0.00029257868,0.00069875584,0.000882323,0.000432193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798214,0.0007763146,0.0002538612,0.000258653,0.0006147788,0.00011415369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023586112,0.0003455507,0.00043024714,0.002110507,0.00434878,0.0051685055,0.00063006656,0.0018197786,0.00882971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044616903,0.00028296758,0.00054099713,0.0021896148,0.00762293,0.0033654307,0.0021346249,0.004180995,0.002827763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031816805,0.0000030820088,0.00006614243,0.000023337565,7.775286e-7,0.000046069115,0.0003484584,0.00010900187,0.000029755776,0.9916911,0.0034639006,0.0042151487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005311583,0.000024852961,0.0010809745,0.0002705159,0.0000040912955,0.00034093254,0.00035699297,0.0009207168,0.00015712439,0.29344895,0.70335966,0.000029814968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149403615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009233414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149403615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008418596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003105989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06108141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W862080893","doi":"","title":"Costs Immunity: Banishing the \"Bane\" of Costs from Public Interest Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Humanities; Political science; Public order; Welfare economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0461253407968256,"score_gpt":0.2948359846570084,"score_spread":0.2487106438601828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W862080893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17486744,0.0016003621,0.018119821,0.019943725,0.00046909074,0.0005557335,0.00011580443,0.00034565764,0.7839825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94921654,0.0007026071,0.0053703403,0.007639019,0.000200009,0.00011865601,0.000054126253,0.000056161276,0.03664256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98466253,0.002080666,0.00049942796,0.00080456556,0.008756437,0.0031963848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98488337,0.0074413787,0.0015296146,0.0017671316,0.0030395065,0.0013390362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046219174,0.0004655762,0.00041241208,0.0015477343,0.003422678,0.008428518,0.0016441826,0.0042517255,0.008298765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03266545,0.00031210837,0.00049084687,0.0007774386,0.0115022,0.004508943,0.004935371,0.004475169,0.0009980885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017342113,0.0002676224,0.007145574,0.00019263898,0.000023391722,0.00046517773,0.0031008185,0.0012805951,0.0034709955,0.8643215,0.017609254,0.10194903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071713375,0.0013652049,0.07388834,0.0012089983,0.00046848762,0.001739618,0.011041716,0.012309134,0.02280042,0.3276228,0.5464717,0.00036647313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14294618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23515405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14294618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010821035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028930165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28422827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W864449302","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511795497.019","title":"PREPARATIONS FOR THE ACCESSION OF PRINCESS VICTORIA. PLAN FOR THE MARRIAGE WITH PRINCE ALBERT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accession; Plan (archaeology); History; Genealogy; Economics; Archaeology; International trade","score_opus":0.05587836696255561,"score_gpt":0.26778165653808883,"score_spread":0.21190328957553323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W864449302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004905892,0.0048358687,0.0008399478,0.038689584,0.005092799,0.00020033933,0.00020339973,0.00007220702,0.94516003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012607782,0.00096201035,0.00033813904,0.0030344082,0.00011504547,0.000032260545,0.00006004917,0.000031341737,0.9828189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944156,0.00009801319,0.00001541109,0.00004814214,0.000195666,0.00020130363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967694,0.000035219688,0.000016591637,0.000016386286,0.000115743554,0.00013919234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007929602,0.00023146783,0.00017127373,0.00033689753,0.0073210904,0.002126095,0.00058917486,0.0022930752,0.08065825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002078717,0.00036385102,0.00023115729,0.0003944412,0.0010378847,0.0013622742,0.0019614673,0.00491744,0.020350922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002366685,0.000031254247,0.0002937576,0.00007062678,0.0000022422937,0.00043012088,0.0043770424,0.000076936085,0.00029661547,0.12539904,0.83180624,0.037192363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002940872,0.000008638175,0.00088771473,0.00007064868,0.0000011482406,0.00007760949,0.0019261099,0.000021172564,0.0000623943,0.0018964446,0.9950387,0.0000065599743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10432968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30057868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10432968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034536845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008144257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26982874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9008290","doi":"10.29173/alr112","title":"Fiduciary Law and the Constructive Trust: Perfecting the Fiduciary Undertaking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Obligation; Constructive trust; Law; Business; Law and economics; Constructive; Accountability; Corporation; Accounting; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027626067648264606,"score_gpt":0.32281125025979135,"score_spread":0.29518518261152676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9008290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062629014,0.006177037,0.07986212,0.08740337,0.00049966044,0.00013783122,0.000049107748,0.00012548189,0.7631163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94745666,0.0012988036,0.008414658,0.00841937,0.0001799351,0.000079628764,0.000014886185,0.000033934688,0.034102093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894929,0.0036338242,0.00022663802,0.0007038164,0.0031971983,0.0027456658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99514574,0.0022368976,0.0005081497,0.00070221425,0.0009206449,0.00048635906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077305837,0.00062734616,0.00052376895,0.0015549843,0.009815729,0.014624457,0.0028034733,0.010528375,0.003028693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011677613,0.00053518516,0.000836714,0.0011226984,0.08180913,0.01063604,0.008201679,0.009017893,0.00066740386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001930337,0.000002438216,0.000049692593,0.0000042744628,6.916696e-7,0.000043769534,0.0009804664,0.00008153296,0.000024874997,0.9973162,0.00062089355,0.0008731525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018386794,0.000023493754,0.0004584576,0.00016428782,0.000013014077,0.00015865856,0.003224156,0.00087464007,0.00036848363,0.9301697,0.06448775,0.000038995735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15233329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18681404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15233329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026269434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02810869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30289322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W909319680","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1139","title":"Adding Epicycles: The Inconsistent Use Test in Adverse Possession Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Law; Test (biology); Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Craft; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Public law; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037453398097858914,"score_gpt":0.3204744143169391,"score_spread":0.2830210162190802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W909319680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27165186,0.0017750892,0.19703235,0.06183393,0.00074241194,0.00030373756,0.0006045606,0.000333579,0.46572256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95706064,0.00039627837,0.02471645,0.0044397796,0.00014735082,0.00009738096,0.00010742617,0.000081706814,0.012952813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898803,0.0040164543,0.00046801698,0.00093827065,0.0038655268,0.0008314393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96661514,0.021621529,0.0021541289,0.0036391981,0.0052007646,0.00076924317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01392901,0.00032828085,0.00053091167,0.0029235901,0.004511724,0.004081587,0.0021099679,0.0034252682,0.0053304457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06609951,0.00046438762,0.00046020653,0.0025027571,0.029149076,0.008171755,0.005113244,0.0041767764,0.00051673903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033254066,0.00002315317,0.021583503,0.000034794004,0.000008689314,0.0007727531,0.01724738,0.00041807475,0.00026286408,0.9003157,0.0056400653,0.053659674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004459425,0.00008323131,0.025533149,0.0003864865,0.00005457324,0.0012288368,0.009127774,0.0074292542,0.001548173,0.82891107,0.12553506,0.00011780952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19555768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23630552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009394645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012019801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38883883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W911201","doi":"","title":"An examination of the commercial and non commercial appropriation of persona within the United Kingdom, with a comparative analysis with common and civil law countries.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Durham e-Theses (Durham University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Appropriation; Kingdom; Persona; Law; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035383447718354354,"score_gpt":0.27737657817386224,"score_spread":0.24199313045550788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W911201","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35805586,0.4895289,0.00058497145,0.007332023,0.0002362467,0.00007488437,0.00070496346,0.0000090471285,0.14347324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88642544,0.10554098,0.00036203538,0.0007658466,0.00003467698,0.000036574635,0.00031835196,0.000009725376,0.006506391],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524647,0.0017975708,0.00048725627,0.00037165754,0.0013757609,0.00072130957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895914,0.0055935746,0.0023312108,0.00034770448,0.001884271,0.00025186274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026019563,0.00020998118,0.00032844773,0.0066254404,0.0018931916,0.004337925,0.000516368,0.0010399643,0.004342341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011827044,0.00027025052,0.0003503292,0.014226751,0.00318301,0.0031871474,0.0021299883,0.00060691824,0.0004593751],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037041886,0.00012297544,0.1334773,0.011328381,0.0003011043,0.005908746,0.15653582,0.0007604822,0.0013419169,0.2852198,0.05004134,0.3545918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015875725,0.000103433915,0.54501384,0.0081332605,0.00016736324,0.0029651278,0.11291085,0.00018948584,0.00046457365,0.00404942,0.32593673,0.00005000526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14962472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2566636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14962472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010395062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045164893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29750758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93100283","doi":"","title":"Canadian Contractual Duress and Criminal Duress: 'Irrational, Anomalous, Perverse, Illogical and Fundamentally Wrong' or Just Misunderstood?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Criminology; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03962740434435362,"score_gpt":0.3150022826541479,"score_spread":0.2753748783097943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93100283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16997083,0.03080666,0.0046040276,0.3687831,0.0016567307,0.000068405054,0.0012101115,0.0000863344,0.42281383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97895813,0.006638674,0.00074399053,0.006320917,0.00036295914,0.000020409998,0.00012291878,0.000032299416,0.0067998627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361646,0.0011339963,0.00026905423,0.0005636082,0.0028484967,0.0015685171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837996,0.005915276,0.0020915617,0.001102163,0.0052970666,0.0017944097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054838187,0.0005131177,0.00094366464,0.0038427229,0.010296179,0.009128225,0.0020801637,0.0045614084,0.008424039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055967227,0.00055390387,0.00035070613,0.008378975,0.034023833,0.0074187494,0.0038037568,0.007202358,0.0002795825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021498903,0.000010733957,0.007499116,0.00006906121,0.0000143683765,0.00007409334,0.007656969,0.00036556518,0.000032296306,0.9604821,0.012831738,0.010942395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004545867,0.000020117062,0.07045583,0.00086850283,0.00007158803,0.00027958813,0.01948093,0.0021212504,0.00014685212,0.80650735,0.09979498,0.00020759992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97196096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97031814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0619643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0619643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.124733746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4495846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93266422","doi":"","title":"UCPR 229 - defamation proceedings – damages to be assessed – application to interrogate as to defendant’s motive - implications of Defamation ACT 2005 - application to interrogate before action - when in the interests of justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Hogan; Action (physics); Law; Economic Justice; Legal action; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.06487066528326234,"score_gpt":0.4033442066552881,"score_spread":0.33847354137202573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93266422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06018585,0.00371938,0.011328127,0.06779951,0.0021954891,0.001474227,0.0025054235,0.0008147956,0.84997725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5702561,0.0016707741,0.015177597,0.17520857,0.002067506,0.0016499567,0.0010376076,0.00024886223,0.23268293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96791995,0.0073135723,0.003538576,0.004224852,0.012122542,0.0048804507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852476,0.008714431,0.00093623897,0.001393148,0.003076301,0.0006323152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015067214,0.0013829542,0.0017184967,0.0023676418,0.00886956,0.01048441,0.0059046336,0.041403923,0.009686341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034457475,0.002304792,0.003355051,0.0014927058,0.007134066,0.0042330204,0.0055927807,0.016915992,0.005470284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034096555,0.000524967,0.004658276,0.00038474382,0.00015062474,0.0043347958,0.0054306495,0.0016847941,0.005900252,0.7297839,0.22264303,0.024162982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047991483,0.0020019605,0.039353322,0.0017063727,0.00068803056,0.0049674734,0.0049119964,0.005292013,0.011658873,0.10550307,0.8221918,0.0012451444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11557662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19595063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11557662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010676791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012287382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2298078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94463204","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673582.003.0009","title":"The Relativity of Title and Causa Possessionis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Dominion; Variety (cybernetics); Law and economics; Normative; Law; Political science; Nexus (standard); Property (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029655908280924174,"score_gpt":0.24463760265077303,"score_spread":0.21498169436984885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94463204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076123374,0.009367376,0.019161964,0.005622951,0.0011069323,0.000052104664,0.000097477736,0.00015597441,0.95682293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6430328,0.014473182,0.010089708,0.0030752392,0.0044435505,0.00027825052,0.00032059776,0.0005003125,0.32378644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968256,0.0009839617,0.00020378432,0.0005955553,0.0010832604,0.0003078437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976724,0.0012223135,0.00025087455,0.0004955317,0.00029225723,0.00006667056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028164177,0.0005020375,0.00068617077,0.0021527677,0.0043454133,0.007354368,0.0012468797,0.0023828673,0.010174113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049910545,0.0007106968,0.0006915231,0.0015394825,0.018241456,0.015001989,0.0049520116,0.0056319153,0.0026259618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002733557,0.000002861985,0.0000788696,0.00002037479,0.0000019707147,0.000033967455,0.0012807772,0.000023755616,0.000054954096,0.99414563,0.0013975813,0.0029564654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009275468,0.000024930097,0.0006164954,0.00025841093,0.000017054634,0.0005728129,0.001338513,0.00019890563,0.0006339924,0.66705096,0.32925835,0.000020168573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002523572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020000269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010174113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044845873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019426256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03403586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95341731","doi":"","title":"The Commonwealth War Graves Commission’s “Debt of Honour Register”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian military history","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Commission; Commonwealth; Debt; Register (sociolinguistics); Political science; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Finance; Linguistics","score_opus":0.027651780863891775,"score_gpt":0.27640032619584093,"score_spread":0.24874854533194915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95341731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01666672,0.006462062,0.0011189346,0.42960954,0.017502451,0.0001807759,0.0014206208,0.00019522577,0.5268436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11103989,0.0021832366,0.000981134,0.097533554,0.0018525763,0.000088095854,0.00039702596,0.00014915348,0.78577536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917603,0.0005623126,0.0002595334,0.00056359626,0.0043439493,0.0025103653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99273044,0.0012514084,0.00026768463,0.0004467154,0.003850634,0.0014531135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048254677,0.0005863371,0.0007110945,0.0022005236,0.023159938,0.012883186,0.002717402,0.01612039,0.016439607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023977749,0.001008174,0.00067693193,0.002290783,0.0067573804,0.0034955782,0.0034739177,0.016483158,0.002171092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018858904,0.00001592837,0.0008221057,0.000031943884,0.000007100839,0.00011077442,0.0014880286,0.00008041,0.00010370173,0.2034837,0.78528446,0.0085529825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008511625,0.0000065595405,0.0028445534,0.000085100626,0.00000675408,0.000029501005,0.0009421138,0.00010528006,0.00012216311,0.005796119,0.99002075,0.00003272378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94983745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9758388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050266784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050266784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15165092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36471277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W958495244","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.012","title":"Jurisprudential milestones in the development of trust law in South Africa's mixed legal system","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031562375182040185,"score_gpt":0.23075379929156523,"score_spread":0.19919142410952503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W958495244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15871884,0.025979083,0.017733388,0.05505668,0.00043236202,0.00029019554,0.00006836311,0.00003983666,0.74168134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572034,0.0030622454,0.0045553497,0.0011614125,0.00006950459,0.00013851299,0.000013869057,0.000027942991,0.03376788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997156,0.0014629277,0.00014983522,0.00018501298,0.00042518278,0.0006210817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959816,0.0027442568,0.0002790349,0.00017214351,0.00044186294,0.0003811002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066539664,0.00031081281,0.00024186868,0.0016427102,0.0063448115,0.008393017,0.00086644985,0.002927762,0.004287799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013085581,0.0005371359,0.00025971455,0.0018247447,0.016542515,0.008787063,0.00477858,0.005763902,0.00032794304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034751004,0.000004872878,0.000084045,0.000015503441,6.387389e-7,0.00008877997,0.0080453,0.000051201456,0.000060131028,0.987079,0.0006509854,0.003916146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020143263,0.00006308445,0.0022783892,0.0009090696,0.000009476489,0.0005230651,0.01889614,0.0010544321,0.00070832047,0.78565913,0.18984789,0.00003082476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01929697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034652136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01929697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013859842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017695572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100560665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W96810772","doi":"10.29173/alr320","title":"The Legislature Strikes Back: The Effect of Ontario’s Bill 152 on the Statutory Duty of Care in the Peoples Decision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Legislature; Law; Presumption; Statutory law; Supreme court; Duty of care; Corporation; Ultra vires; Repeal; Parliament; Statutory interpretation; Creditor; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.012555227211986144,"score_gpt":0.30409755654971377,"score_spread":0.2915423293377276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W96810772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06545108,0.009005549,0.0016785301,0.3804658,0.003800784,0.00012348121,0.0003470158,0.00007162072,0.5390561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6531054,0.00384563,0.0010684298,0.2228299,0.0013471807,0.00009522102,0.0001278524,0.000086216234,0.11749433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97766054,0.0031767604,0.0005035255,0.0014352693,0.010833435,0.0063905227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891398,0.0049219765,0.00067744113,0.00038970605,0.0038060485,0.0010650482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010986249,0.0003479805,0.0006820454,0.0016204818,0.02441641,0.009642058,0.0022163347,0.010463096,0.003747359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021722099,0.00086074363,0.0010686783,0.0019871092,0.021675562,0.002635652,0.002778769,0.011474778,0.00063109875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054850552,0.000024857463,0.002962748,0.00009307625,0.000036533296,0.0005827105,0.016686961,0.00032793693,0.00044532644,0.8371549,0.13110693,0.01052316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010819518,0.000044489683,0.018455368,0.0005774634,0.00013753657,0.000114477036,0.010906042,0.00045137145,0.0007419588,0.041042574,0.9272625,0.0001580912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98619217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12733251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12733251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15588365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92386633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W969998234","doi":"","title":"Through the looking glass? : Some reflections on the trial of Maurice Papon","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03984422850213513,"score_gpt":0.2710607207438004,"score_spread":0.23121649224166527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W969998234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013066138,0.00896384,0.00029315476,0.9699755,0.0049184137,0.000009296203,0.000008963856,0.000010873981,0.014513385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09509625,0.011604606,0.00080598495,0.8385296,0.005566029,0.00009500714,0.000010526461,0.0002057451,0.048086338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763066,0.014608414,0.0003969774,0.001630909,0.0035311086,0.0035259128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97305804,0.020073866,0.0008431235,0.00071004074,0.003178683,0.0021362682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02496066,0.0007955434,0.0010370289,0.0011972374,0.030287083,0.016213683,0.004256666,0.027978294,0.007630668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06927697,0.0007942284,0.0008556409,0.0016859367,0.04534826,0.018633751,0.009009183,0.051990382,0.001323345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003386227,0.000034047072,0.00023880077,0.00008469998,0.000010473,0.00067882583,0.05843053,0.00010238039,0.000114983755,0.21907648,0.71032387,0.010871182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015553964,0.000018206394,0.00025486565,0.0004325196,0.000006117811,0.00018587761,0.044500023,0.00006219889,0.00015217418,0.038171213,0.91615164,0.00004953809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12773962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14210944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12773962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01997422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021573387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25399214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}