{"meta":{"query_hash":"bbb2ea18f736","filters":{"topic":"Legal principles and applications"},"cohort_total":2078,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":2078,"exported":2078,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bbb2ea18f736","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Legal+principles+and+applications"},"results":[{"id":"W101537623","doi":"","title":"Policing Contracts for Unconscionability: Guidelines for International Arbitrators Subject to the Scrutiny of US Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Statutory law; Scrutiny; Law; Political science; Statute; Common law; Doctrine; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.04270746682536422,"score_gpt":0.40025637272752645,"score_spread":0.35754890590216226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101537623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7392893,0.00040162975,0.16777669,0.086597,0.00097490166,0.0015270843,0.00006120025,0.000031910808,0.003340319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99485093,0.000118226395,0.0011925184,0.0014831355,0.0018539572,0.000028309825,0.0000024771323,0.000010047574,0.00046040927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980231,0.000034608216,0.00042915432,0.00013089801,0.00029371685,0.0010885553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790776,0.0004566056,0.00021834443,0.00010640815,0.0012111558,0.00009970809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008369361,0.00007837564,0.00012090987,0.00006954351,0.00064455805,0.000058968755,0.00042419301,0.00005274561,0.000007029145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024763683,0.00005734873,0.00014460688,0.00015011065,0.00008538417,0.00009150646,0.00002093427,0.00030056728,0.0000017067745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008115378,0.000040002302,0.002769042,0.0000021130368,0.000066133594,6.4141354e-8,0.0009463102,0.00011749416,0.00044007116,0.98155075,0.0013670065,0.01261983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005820128,0.00014457291,0.001702148,0.000017646002,0.000037712718,0.000011436585,0.0072314846,0.00013561372,0.0006782433,0.24748948,0.7418407,0.00012895005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002531047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07735824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7404737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059582945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025537186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93947756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W101999146","doi":"","title":"HMRC v Weald Leasing Ltd. Not only artifical: the abuse of law test in VAT","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excise; Payment; Test (biology); Law; Element (criminal law); Revenue; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.06574689821180192,"score_gpt":0.30084486726051524,"score_spread":0.23509796904871333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W101999146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7035275,0.000023190552,0.0009986449,0.0059375954,0.000028173881,0.0006060221,0.00020259555,0.000046796747,0.28862944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901311,0.0021252744,0.0015672732,0.000043476815,0.000036528287,2.2221005e-7,0.000017790708,0.000011279133,0.006067073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710345,0.0005914576,0.0001821745,0.0004071912,0.0009753542,0.0007403944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972974,0.0013220616,0.00016354087,0.00054415327,0.00037327016,0.00029955668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013182007,0.00014189193,0.0002962187,0.0004138451,0.0027366201,0.00002712053,0.0016903409,0.00012148601,0.00011336602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020115936,0.00015598373,0.0001958814,0.0013655026,0.0047156154,0.0005790081,0.0005543424,0.0007428717,0.000015785063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005021827,0.0008630908,0.037055,0.000058120466,0.000069563044,0.00015135885,0.055974644,0.00012010173,0.002237238,0.89748347,0.0022011804,0.0032840767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089256297,0.00015507612,0.054135352,0.00006793636,0.000024108132,0.0000036369204,0.04120191,0.00051090465,0.00014176812,0.0029648212,0.8996864,0.00021552616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027883293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06368462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8974852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029927792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007882869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1033596391","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511778711.001","title":"Preface","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.030990166749577854,"score_gpt":0.24232276970566877,"score_spread":0.2113326029560909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1033596391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000698996,0.000033237626,0.00014402258,0.00015457293,0.00019657619,0.00040298945,0.00018759367,0.00017526606,0.9986358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016440772,0.0001123269,0.0001637794,0.00006025177,0.0003352993,8.237421e-7,0.000018467736,0.000024154453,0.99764085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990256,0.000025010459,0.00010076693,0.00033384396,0.00027154505,0.00024323777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990335,0.00005323024,0.00013806124,0.00042405425,0.0001349047,0.00021625921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012468129,0.00017751455,0.00018581924,0.000060091523,0.00076609704,0.000067346,0.0006368156,0.0004824438,0.00003422468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001157254,0.0002175199,0.00014955053,0.0000063266953,0.0005470779,0.000075115706,0.0002369695,0.0006121537,0.00008552363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006163076,0.000004334202,6.212217e-7,0.000008549603,0.000022715261,0.000016030768,0.00021317204,1.6380196e-7,0.000052191568,0.9856255,0.013367542,0.0006830305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116038,0.0000065893746,0.000006006909,0.000022116223,0.00006842737,7.0963694e-7,0.000071377086,0.0000016066581,0.000097714474,0.0000693793,0.99929386,0.00024620007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001843698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001875605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9859263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014253077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027135696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8870204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W103413524","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1507","title":"\"Are We There Yet?\": Towards a New Rule for Choice of Law in Tort","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Tort; Law; Relevance (law); Rule of law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Duty; Legal certainty; Political science; Choice of law; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; Conflict of laws; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.0728043420248603,"score_gpt":0.3592577814092565,"score_spread":0.2864534393843962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W103413524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018003736,0.00051894714,0.00013040705,0.012272098,0.00009722263,0.0002413617,0.00002728773,0.0000209057,0.968688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915925,0.00032172198,0.001264355,0.00036821477,0.0005004916,0.000011987628,0.0000012590567,0.000011728749,0.0059277224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990401,0.000053884338,0.00025946123,0.00012400854,0.00025303793,0.0002694525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994107,0.00006710165,0.000155998,0.00012571273,0.00006898101,0.00017151376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036830996,0.000080341844,0.00016259577,0.00001775954,0.00046161248,0.00009742143,0.00033164537,0.00008512005,0.0012484747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029086606,0.00007077244,0.00011146364,0.000111384936,0.000110807625,0.0002262415,0.000017393373,0.00018154681,0.000022117361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016403914,0.00008409641,0.0005474339,0.000008385831,0.000012389984,0.0000027592687,0.0014698202,0.00006803967,0.000051224455,0.9820017,0.0014358042,0.01430193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005131242,0.000025385847,0.002094406,0.00006876799,0.000012913976,0.000003826761,0.0005784213,0.000019725247,0.00013688479,0.1299577,0.86648446,0.00010436691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18875392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5438776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97358876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079553414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016850003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W109702861","doi":"","title":"Good Faith and Wrongful Dismissal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Obligation; Bad faith; Compensation (psychology); Damages; Faith; Argument (complex analysis); Good faith; Tort; Law; Unfair dismissal; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01412940399215915,"score_gpt":0.26559655642047997,"score_spread":0.2514671524283208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W109702861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60185355,0.010708498,0.0058166776,0.052035287,0.00023834243,0.0003482967,0.0000058327278,0.00014070436,0.3288528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786104,0.0063387332,0.000054919692,0.00009096365,0.00041016287,0.0000033510926,3.2275736e-7,0.0000072843636,0.014483838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983701,0.00005510343,0.00011051949,0.000109214474,0.00019599177,0.001159058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996906,0.000028999211,0.00005617382,0.00007152025,0.000030131672,0.00012257253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000714816,0.00006231248,0.00007087383,0.000027177035,0.0007713508,0.00011137127,0.00017366468,0.000045493318,0.00018154737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003336781,0.000054006076,0.000039213995,0.000120912395,0.00010532486,0.00017883012,0.000021767266,0.00069383986,0.00006258568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013687011,0.000028597295,0.0013097578,5.6204937e-7,0.000016169584,6.033924e-7,0.0012389981,0.0000012138441,0.000023534356,0.968856,0.00027390078,0.02824931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043966842,0.000113157155,0.001744714,0.000006696793,0.000027627066,0.00008973238,0.009202323,0.00014427026,0.00000971066,0.33548942,0.65252924,0.00020346002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040333148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037650154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6522553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002686749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032336087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59326845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1143643400","doi":"","title":"Title Registration and the Abolition of Notice in British Columbia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Statute; Doctrine; Appeal; Law; Equity (law); Political science; Security interest; Legislature; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.011252179233131952,"score_gpt":0.2574278891782304,"score_spread":0.24617570994509844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1143643400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25734153,0.000087621294,0.00010747155,0.0015612394,0.000059178747,0.0001600839,0.000006057036,0.000015464026,0.7406614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945324,0.000032949676,0.00010754625,0.00015071098,0.0000857977,0.0000073673564,0.0000016941568,0.0000015619685,0.005079994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997269,0.00004780297,0.000062833475,0.00004868404,0.0000667674,0.000047025555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983186,0.000043137516,0.000027218368,0.00005868532,0.000019391593,0.000019693778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003217183,0.000011532805,0.000035903373,0.0000024730462,0.00010599798,0.00008682132,0.000048554753,0.000022812947,0.00023669626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008427772,0.000014045018,0.000009474365,0.000050132727,0.00013730054,0.000053094176,0.0000075512853,0.00004089764,0.000035916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010141024,0.000009692873,0.0014551287,0.000004326914,9.151495e-7,9.408863e-8,0.00019016677,0.0000012134404,0.000022442158,0.99192345,0.00434325,0.0020482987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000313873,0.0000054793545,0.036879357,0.000017642296,0.000004730603,4.3899627e-7,0.0002656929,0.00011515309,0.000012985155,0.043145414,0.9191945,0.000044741064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16223447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4823191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94877803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008865215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018376233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8433443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116281993","doi":"","title":"Personal property security law reform in England and Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Personal property; Law; Security interest; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08610741597746681,"score_gpt":0.28375678893163697,"score_spread":0.19764937295417018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116281993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96016914,0.00006775008,0.0000014640724,0.01503897,0.000010326889,0.0002099417,0.0000061632513,0.000007016571,0.024489226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907035,0.00033638268,0.000016207072,0.00004278642,0.000035393776,0.00000107996,8.670505e-7,0.000002523058,0.00049443776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989701,0.00018025628,0.00005647148,0.00013512366,0.00041644866,0.00024163132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995977,0.00008431658,0.000019766458,0.000120247605,0.00008303134,0.00009492067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007094586,0.000041131214,0.00007442704,0.000032454078,0.00064499944,0.000020492078,0.00025438235,0.000035247464,0.00016018905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027297076,0.00002910793,0.000017239,0.00015830959,0.0006424426,0.00016291667,0.00013810163,0.00023079247,0.000010916693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030941523,0.00011460834,0.010744283,0.000053558877,0.00001626667,0.000032843032,0.94439775,0.0000014435205,0.000052497446,0.038260218,0.0025236506,0.003771946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028811593,0.000018492825,0.0071788933,0.000019098441,0.0000022071101,6.314769e-7,0.116413444,0.00023571312,0.000015869633,0.00041820388,0.87534994,0.0000593747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7143536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.839455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8728263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039398356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000133968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49608794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W117114211","doi":"","title":"Setting aside default judgment - whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered - service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) - requirements for affadavit of service","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proctor/˜The œproctor","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aside; Service (business); Business; Law; Management; Engineering; Political science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.11132254642257207,"score_gpt":0.36732972055023766,"score_spread":0.2560071741276656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117114211","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44508952,0.0010758565,0.032295775,0.47162068,0.0017201001,0.024939258,0.0012776287,0.0013348573,0.020646328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674584,0.00004408574,0.008287009,0.009260585,0.00066887744,0.0010520195,0.00015853766,0.00008722502,0.012983251],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614036,0.00021627868,0.0009208115,0.0007255004,0.0010681353,0.00092891644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968468,0.00023876922,0.0007879565,0.000847246,0.0009634278,0.00031577997],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013724682,0.00041446806,0.0004413045,0.00010861538,0.0013915998,0.0003482274,0.0012023664,0.00024000999,0.00033195637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015453072,0.00032056213,0.00020900031,0.0010430863,0.0001545709,0.0007878554,0.00016347779,0.00026690235,0.00007559028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003122932,0.009649848,0.00503854,0.0025657457,0.0020807756,0.000017724115,0.1275942,0.0019486666,0.39478385,0.3087062,0.096442595,0.04804895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006773268,0.0013491793,0.018639145,0.0010385312,0.0010476441,0.000016408487,0.022765687,0.0045102653,0.01585812,0.053377595,0.87195647,0.0026676694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025272726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01241892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7755139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004918061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008171538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W120017687","doi":"","title":"A Comment on \"No Comment\": The Sub Judice Rule and the Accountability of Public Officials in the 21st Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Rule of law; Convention; Law; Statutory law; Humanities; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.02858295979937917,"score_gpt":0.2898832402703352,"score_spread":0.261300280470956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W120017687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47254544,0.00033241863,0.0000035921844,0.4232653,0.000117480144,0.0016971634,0.000029297065,0.000023570949,0.10198572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97189695,0.00036606536,0.000016249123,0.027248403,0.00014720426,0.0002696673,0.0000045259208,0.0000057383913,0.00004518746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784124,0.00096573756,0.00029479404,0.00018245346,0.00042797456,0.00028777338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978751,0.0012533123,0.00014222316,0.00053664704,0.00011592216,0.00007680426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035525158,0.00010258501,0.00016645822,0.000014891547,0.0009477561,0.00034210095,0.00077059644,0.00006019997,0.00026968087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003315061,0.00005013864,0.00006743425,0.00026920033,0.00093016715,0.00021262863,0.00014538551,0.0003067078,0.00015473837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009899166,0.0001773769,0.002644407,0.0000055254086,0.000010117501,5.8571057e-8,0.0031261786,0.0000012056062,0.000027744947,0.9844369,0.008421026,0.001139521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004914589,0.000019544028,0.01740073,0.000012953143,0.00001156977,1.9084425e-7,0.013054714,0.000016802618,0.000041460677,0.012269216,0.9565984,0.000082964136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06348017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016382555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97216773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078344594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079549485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9427562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W13259318","doi":"","title":"A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE PAROL EVIDENCE RULE IN CONTRACT LAW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of allergy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Rigour; Commission; Common law; Law and economics; Political science; Unconscionability; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09056264957926108,"score_gpt":0.4188014815222654,"score_spread":0.3282388319430043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13259318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7602428,0.00045272286,0.00017008865,0.08665067,0.0001983209,0.0001905407,0.000009734494,0.000019754865,0.15206534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990608,0.00010142653,0.00005771438,0.00063599524,0.00006965039,0.000009386875,1.7599338e-7,0.0000025076702,0.000062354324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992385,0.0001432353,0.00017603108,0.00008755013,0.00020649272,0.0001481848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985497,0.0010649972,0.00005959393,0.00016574816,0.00011587673,0.0000440654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006015289,0.0000373944,0.000101954065,0.000010642553,0.000087910994,0.000012928318,0.00029413684,0.000043365246,0.00006827762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017196365,0.000027913775,0.000060356764,0.00011568252,0.00040317024,0.00012365924,0.00004285044,0.000064305656,0.0000066495327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065388163,0.00006316165,0.00066144357,0.0000048708025,0.000005172366,9.346521e-8,0.0012180253,0.000025363142,0.0004185948,0.99633473,0.00041125712,0.0008507661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022708505,0.000071852286,0.11456847,0.00020199365,0.0000062035174,3.527063e-7,0.0008928059,0.0003714473,0.0066731046,0.06198472,0.8148366,0.00016532197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010832113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075249234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000031040306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005865772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99575484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134763176","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.023","title":"The trust and its civilian analogues","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03139921788172029,"score_gpt":0.23116824693522406,"score_spread":0.19976902905350377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134763176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003381814,0.00038579918,0.000010838577,0.00036369608,0.00008475766,0.000429725,0.000113650975,0.0000695399,0.9982038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01133343,0.0013011377,0.000009213778,0.000049500115,0.00018066548,0.0000015617389,0.000009886874,0.000013829987,0.9871008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991807,0.00003925435,0.00009555723,0.00026032946,0.0001978641,0.00022629516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921715,0.000108196975,0.00011639078,0.0002543486,0.00013009005,0.00017382107],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001371365,0.00015079287,0.00014726244,0.00003680924,0.0014871841,0.00014832553,0.00047309935,0.00020559803,0.000011799302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014615611,0.00013520848,0.000083059655,0.0000070366514,0.00050903833,0.00008655237,0.00023218303,0.00025757618,0.000049386825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036056003,0.000001623885,0.0000010659056,0.0000071270333,0.000028981534,0.000005412687,0.0002470411,8.331362e-8,0.000003607963,0.9726463,0.02539827,0.0016568583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084379564,0.000007679499,0.000039094815,0.000021723057,0.00005531244,6.411201e-7,0.00024705124,0.000019957923,0.000008772006,0.00010123309,0.99924785,0.00016628593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018588881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032395773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009411379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011267458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W137645581","doi":"","title":"เลสเบยน, ชนชน และพนทชวต: ขอพจารณาบางประการวาดวยประวตศาสตรของพนทผานชวตของ แอน ลสเตอร","year":2012,"lang":"th","type":"article","venue":"วารสารศิลปศาสตร์ (Journal of Liberal Arts)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Gentry; Public sphere; Space (punctuation); Subject (documents); Sociology; Private space; Public life; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.060603898744134514,"score_gpt":0.3523361562872019,"score_spread":0.29173225754306736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W137645581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6770509,0.025402492,0.013055135,0.07240616,0.027099933,0.0039515547,0.0005049365,0.0015544179,0.17897446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508123,0.0034172863,0.011679571,0.0031431196,0.0157771,0.000040281197,0.00002074203,0.00035275542,0.014756845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084795,0.0007652558,0.002720031,0.0007074418,0.0023764744,0.0025828267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245715,0.0006385706,0.002634017,0.0010054995,0.00094633776,0.0023183946],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042472025,0.0009597283,0.001518498,0.00050856575,0.0011605175,0.0006694369,0.0022325902,0.00070625,0.0020440056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037270717,0.00084764743,0.001343916,0.0015747722,0.0010617804,0.0035657429,0.00054112513,0.0020004178,0.0013313259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053154066,0.0063081747,0.036082376,0.0003213671,0.0019940098,0.00025812216,0.09158021,0.00023117915,0.003272732,0.26232457,0.3293728,0.2677229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016088164,0.0004690548,0.008412958,0.00028498034,0.0005250999,0.0002609576,0.004626501,0.00021137591,0.0007140677,0.007860703,0.9738607,0.0011648277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007135157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001477296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64448786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007107598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009899371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1446773695","doi":"","title":"Common Law Property Theory and Jurisprudence in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Expropriation; Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Property law; Sociology; Land law; Epistemology; Land tenure; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.024915734848097188,"score_gpt":0.2848853378712027,"score_spread":0.2599696030231055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1446773695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5538875,0.00047196972,0.000017247521,0.0057423376,0.0001514106,0.0003760494,0.00001651451,0.00004598033,0.43929103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948327,0.000025836865,0.000111050955,0.0017844357,0.00009762383,0.00003266991,0.0000018534955,0.0000064101555,0.0031074218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896604,0.00021118276,0.00013886615,0.00017571033,0.00026812797,0.00024007862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933565,0.00010393361,0.000036568614,0.00018615503,0.000045298413,0.00029237737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086492515,0.000071157825,0.000114667164,0.000009243612,0.00028236094,0.00008716484,0.00025057868,0.000042648542,0.0000644524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081017664,0.000053051783,0.000013193752,0.00013921602,0.00021800639,0.00022672211,0.000077125,0.00017114558,0.0000436917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008186552,0.000014457935,0.008511666,0.0000031421116,0.0000020827215,0.000005118589,0.00079695124,0.000008869119,0.000017954933,0.9883532,0.0016358672,0.00064251793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020924512,0.000010800463,0.0033180928,0.000017557362,0.0000039428805,9.233832e-7,0.0022896684,0.000020097501,0.000091000016,0.036518943,0.95738435,0.00013536293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99310845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9557485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032810977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010274127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21717206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1455151012","doi":"10.5902/198136947040","title":"JUSTINIANO I, LEGISLADOR","year":2009,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.04153086519473773,"score_gpt":0.35895844010769395,"score_spread":0.3174275749129562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1455151012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08491767,0.042331427,0.002556197,0.101360515,0.0031228762,0.0039684577,0.0006626535,0.0013035486,0.75977665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622957,0.0030598522,0.0005294409,0.0017691386,0.003988303,0.000061027262,0.00004763159,0.000068109795,0.028180784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950167,0.0003857524,0.0009648498,0.0011098624,0.00097146386,0.0015513612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646133,0.00042925935,0.0005462712,0.0014451721,0.00025129927,0.00086667616],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014819709,0.0005742235,0.0008046697,0.00013677256,0.0013743261,0.0016060128,0.0017324206,0.0004976314,0.00073950866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008278642,0.0005933647,0.000561186,0.0015312688,0.00044673987,0.00045702615,0.00019159209,0.0008962071,0.0016724755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006881802,0.000531811,0.00038872115,0.000094782714,0.000080231344,0.000040519433,0.0031246038,0.000006114259,0.0005058962,0.8408381,0.08717865,0.067141786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006866783,0.0002029382,0.0033695502,0.00025887278,0.00022080154,0.000007205893,0.0007008674,0.000104362276,0.00003605775,0.0012261522,0.9924475,0.00073903525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031973163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004933606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90526885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005037836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008714804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1458225820","doi":"10.32920/22229320","title":"Austin’s Complementary Jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal positivism; Perspective (graphical); Positivism; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.0832755735722623,"score_gpt":0.41832230817800553,"score_spread":0.33504673460574325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1458225820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10466365,0.0000071326267,0.00049759756,0.040837396,0.00014324559,0.00021201551,0.000013019196,0.00059721986,0.8530287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96685535,0.000030392026,0.0004754739,0.0004844018,0.00013544131,0.000018535768,0.00000785078,0.0000025657962,0.03198998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995372,0.00001715915,0.000060024267,0.00008261323,0.00014750988,0.0001554538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997814,0.00005054767,0.000011600654,0.00008221215,0.000018345165,0.000055890723],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023136946,0.000024380179,0.000029192799,0.000019758216,0.00040683278,0.000032401676,0.00015907697,0.0000132687155,0.0017204015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016794615,0.000022362205,0.000017428481,0.00031999848,0.0000618414,0.000063034815,0.00005205951,0.00003088949,0.0022961511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.4641914e-7,0.00000848322,0.0036961476,0.0000011141703,0.0000020818925,0.0000010329741,0.0016752644,0.000005788235,0.000105566025,0.8734057,0.11821393,0.0028845416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031637002,0.0000024970398,0.010328115,0.0000010403592,0.0000014711043,4.6407195e-8,0.0024952758,0.00006338339,0.000037055637,0.0048558954,0.9821448,0.000038826358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005437248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036094366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8685498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021550439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040652933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145886080","doi":"10.29173/alr270","title":"How Goes the Battle? An Exploration of Guardianship Reform","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Legislation; Battle; Law; Political science; Order (exchange); Business; History","score_opus":0.12093026285391588,"score_gpt":0.3666589734278373,"score_spread":0.24572871057392143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145886080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043078354,0.052086413,0.00017450689,0.21759765,0.00044079154,0.0012986206,0.000009706658,0.000041065774,0.7240434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804544,0.016309407,0.00007588085,0.0010802199,0.00030689596,0.00009335422,0.000010860682,0.000006405372,0.0016625817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993038,0.00015242737,0.00013751413,0.00007918371,0.0001605265,0.0001665397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992552,0.00020078463,0.00009973635,0.00031510368,0.000050397695,0.00007877079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007136244,0.000056370045,0.00012586599,0.0000046296764,0.00029466234,0.000044287775,0.00024872736,0.00003108593,0.00009228402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019465784,0.000033247976,0.00006701125,0.00016876913,0.00014871999,0.0013221924,0.000023050321,0.000056102905,0.00007258621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.5964513e-7,0.00001910103,0.00010116544,0.000072556984,0.0000039819374,8.66095e-9,0.0014654985,3.858492e-8,0.0000061010596,0.99244136,0.00047331463,0.0054166424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001728734,0.0000062937456,0.00017673781,0.000118052834,0.00003064194,1.8206991e-7,0.0005890968,4.7338165e-7,0.000038932605,0.0010654452,0.997905,0.000051824547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018715594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029063482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003322398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027259492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481842717","doi":"10.22329/il.v30i4.2990","title":"Take My Advice—I Am Not Following It: Ad Hominem Arguments as Legitimate Rebuttals to Appeals to Authority","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Advice (programming); Action (physics); Epistemology; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03376758596611559,"score_gpt":0.35899716338040316,"score_spread":0.3252295774142876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481842717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61459804,0.000003573981,0.00015818438,0.011856103,0.0005743399,0.0007861615,0.000041854015,0.00021012596,0.37177163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810118,0.0000039426186,0.0032059937,0.006654793,0.00027584957,0.00016014549,0.000013630039,0.000010862112,0.008662967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981278,0.000029812598,0.00039704973,0.0002683989,0.00051480293,0.0006621253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988377,0.000070529015,0.00010887876,0.00035036166,0.0001075795,0.0005249235],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010508462,0.00017020987,0.00021626607,0.00008607896,0.00087199104,0.0003312267,0.0006445838,0.00016228031,0.00041613146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047566704,0.00015613732,0.00013941499,0.00043492977,0.00006743912,0.00068062736,0.00020959321,0.00028980518,0.003938148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014357416,0.0003061321,0.003969219,0.00005041866,0.00009328566,0.000042571053,0.04454602,0.00038156493,0.01666469,0.8528423,0.023499772,0.057460465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021241559,0.000075155964,0.0075783045,0.000015584123,0.0000130827075,0.000001725878,0.0015501833,0.000038489703,0.0007460588,0.0010491963,0.98844427,0.0002755421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021430773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028944195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9649445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005976043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016664606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482300516","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199829699.003.0008","title":"Fiduciary Duties and Responsibilities of Portfolio Managers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Beneficiary; Discretion; Corporation; Principal (computer security); Business; Portfolio; Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Actuarial science; Economics; Political science; Finance; Duty","score_opus":0.027073193924541574,"score_gpt":0.2774043993446329,"score_spread":0.25033120542009135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482300516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070746714,0.00049225095,0.000006110294,0.0012254183,0.000050116465,0.00027134546,0.00002402323,0.000042942742,0.99718034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03339867,0.001208442,0.00030667838,0.000119309756,0.00010138439,0.000009391756,0.000005091515,0.0000121883195,0.96483886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999248,0.000015906193,0.00020711106,0.00018801205,0.00021511987,0.00012580257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993752,0.00013198493,0.000115126175,0.00022479032,0.00008450316,0.000068363355],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026070827,0.00010746074,0.00018787284,0.00007927149,0.00017771366,0.00004198815,0.0001483315,0.00016976535,0.0072866757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032190255,0.00009570707,0.00006569921,0.00001939491,0.0006402656,0.00009916827,0.00008458056,0.00010744681,0.00009210559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002253151,0.0000027315339,0.000011807307,0.000016924927,0.000015297248,5.897768e-7,0.0010012239,1.3398328e-7,0.0000019293902,0.98419535,0.012686404,0.0020653785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024190445,0.000008525539,0.00011298548,0.000022096203,0.000016317275,2.3459067e-7,0.0014187037,0.0000010414727,0.0000061327682,0.21274678,0.78554106,0.00010190856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004078971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094833435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7728547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002825318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013666488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484820628","doi":"","title":"Family Law as Fundamental Private Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Family law; Public law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Comparative law; Charter; Jurisdiction; Law reform; Commercial law; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014807945534233646,"score_gpt":0.3171561762931404,"score_spread":0.30234823075890677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484820628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44145617,0.0008118307,0.0022464208,0.0037784455,0.0002025675,0.00017759777,0.0000021136113,0.00006954708,0.5512553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99276394,0.0007975887,0.000113103466,0.001286286,0.00066405477,0.000002788403,0.0000016337584,0.000012644913,0.004357956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718374,0.000053233714,0.00021562743,0.00014231134,0.00038365126,0.002021456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995172,0.00004492846,0.00010054685,0.00011427136,0.00005014137,0.00017292603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027439927,0.00009026263,0.00009360477,0.00002965023,0.0014321518,0.00014944695,0.00035320822,0.000072532326,0.000074205294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015992224,0.00008365901,0.00009288015,0.00017767068,0.00025014786,0.00026188255,0.00003840798,0.0010152275,0.00026150106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111440995,0.000039950875,0.00019717506,4.8144807e-7,0.000024003532,0.0000023650832,0.0004968416,0.0000012524168,0.0007172867,0.9954582,0.000041400122,0.0030099116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018901881,0.00006102851,0.0002638691,0.0000034000861,0.000008907562,0.000027545457,0.0044054645,8.87634e-7,0.00013027136,0.42067438,0.5741412,0.00009405355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008597355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054507162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5747838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010754623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009989922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484910822","doi":"","title":"The Role of Trusts in the 'PPSA'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Personal property; Creditor; Business; Voting trust; Law and economics; Obligation; Settlor; Scope (computer science); Trust law; Property (philosophy); Legislation; Constructive trust; Express trust; Constructive; Uniform Commercial Code; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance; Politics; Debt","score_opus":0.015356535900820777,"score_gpt":0.2741355038283506,"score_spread":0.25877896792752986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484910822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6589436,0.004656461,0.00018459042,0.006177669,0.00008634132,0.00025846547,0.0000010391987,0.000012090375,0.32967973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967369,0.002541249,0.000011671401,0.0000372982,0.00011519374,0.000006186104,7.906153e-8,0.0000027314356,0.00054872135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987668,0.00013940691,0.00012951036,0.00004659858,0.00018314313,0.00073458446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996935,0.00007178867,0.000080062906,0.000102097096,0.000031411397,0.000021124595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028589335,0.00003393172,0.00004329978,0.000016159027,0.0005342933,0.00002871047,0.00052231795,0.00002587551,0.000021024445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049894155,0.000017911729,0.000045493383,0.00016942117,0.00011795024,0.00006833918,0.000013845035,0.0005999143,0.00001070264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004524324,0.00002207706,0.0019461041,1.13709426e-7,0.0000062302574,1.0300035e-7,0.006920472,4.2288445e-7,0.000026388589,0.97322845,0.000014466529,0.017830664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076104276,0.000032785985,0.0041421913,0.0000018626391,0.000005261804,0.000007119595,0.05047362,0.0000056014437,0.00005611183,0.8412415,0.103926614,0.00003123188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025537321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035248354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33779326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013113744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009337521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98235583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486161712","doi":"","title":"Who Lost What? Relationship and Relational Loss","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.03201317785753765,"score_gpt":0.28508991690490376,"score_spread":0.2530767390473661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486161712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6695576,0.025074197,0.008781462,0.12525317,0.00039238564,0.0004605824,0.0000064630954,0.00010184501,0.1703723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601836,0.015623405,0.00008612019,0.00013156996,0.0004311791,0.0000029484108,0.0000011753045,0.000007762344,0.023532223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984654,0.000094160045,0.00016403208,0.00012322498,0.00026461665,0.0008885457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995194,0.00013584198,0.000088746216,0.00008014773,0.0000679849,0.00010787607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011302637,0.00006574646,0.0000709615,0.000051636776,0.0011290686,0.0002176618,0.00013333072,0.00007486563,0.00028118028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001296916,0.0000632974,0.00004400522,0.0002026069,0.00015295364,0.00081870524,0.000018891456,0.0009649573,0.00020486958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017471265,0.000016807346,0.013191532,5.6306004e-7,0.000011664352,5.2526593e-7,0.0012706293,0.000009441085,0.000001848913,0.97888434,0.0002621751,0.0063487277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032273508,0.00004151391,0.015564426,0.000019383942,0.00002031121,0.00009179626,0.0061334237,0.00019809196,0.0000012573989,0.76418895,0.21326073,0.0001573659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000096331976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018338393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29062602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040775153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004367766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8683997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486627762","doi":"","title":"Négligence et obligation de diligence: 40 ans d'évolution (Negligence and The Duty of Care: 40 years of Evolution)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Diligence; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.006478463651571309,"score_gpt":0.2683805545381165,"score_spread":0.2619020908865452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486627762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85583144,0.067755066,0.06456936,0.0077741574,0.0003115437,0.00043446512,0.000029548235,0.000016589085,0.0032778415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97718465,0.021087721,0.00023394072,0.000031853204,0.00031767492,0.000011001079,0.0000034877257,0.00001002051,0.0011196568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997283,0.00042991596,0.0005097792,0.00019664956,0.00047082946,0.001109869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874055,0.00019013931,0.00052211306,0.00018403798,0.00029380328,0.00006937043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00292544,0.00012725414,0.00021618129,0.00006459495,0.0005229381,0.000044131488,0.00037237522,0.00013805807,0.000016602293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012590579,0.00011451702,0.0001487789,0.00067094393,0.0013517694,0.0003610853,0.000050411665,0.000838861,0.000006403285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057750527,0.000057123583,0.004291036,0.000020493437,0.000030527062,2.71345e-7,0.003579971,0.0012127297,0.0006061321,0.977677,0.00002498217,0.012441997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058892707,0.00017240725,0.06918866,0.00011320828,0.00015222355,0.000055887915,0.015545087,0.001242678,0.00061265705,0.90765995,0.0044677723,0.00020052548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024766427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033991612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12135322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001251096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039255144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98363554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489398868","doi":"10.21991/c94t1v","title":"“Irreconcilable? The Duty to Consult and Administrative Decision Makers”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Duty; Sovereignty; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Formative assessment; Relation (database); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03535903856437894,"score_gpt":0.32172282689042964,"score_spread":0.2863637883260507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489398868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0895129,0.0010040192,0.12357629,0.21107651,0.0022581385,0.0053748987,0.00065694295,0.0004141132,0.56612617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906352,0.00008747822,0.0026543562,0.0043413346,0.00016984508,0.0004630497,0.000024014369,0.000006901026,0.0016178045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977485,0.000093957926,0.00045125696,0.00049441523,0.0005238605,0.0006880355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977703,0.0007072193,0.00012631294,0.0003453684,0.0005604014,0.0004903807],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000524917,0.00024502355,0.00023125052,0.000100939855,0.0042938413,0.00044057122,0.00044385367,0.00016331075,0.0010427838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010687335,0.00018892021,0.000108696404,0.000504639,0.007411598,0.0007177734,0.0002215865,0.0002679408,0.0014503347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017312626,0.00004367051,0.004518377,0.0000027625078,0.000026337679,0.0000025430652,0.00040689827,0.00006656958,0.0000841021,0.9631394,0.026928086,0.004763948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006076022,0.000040442777,0.00274109,0.000060778148,0.000028169237,0.000055519096,0.010272504,0.00018466596,0.00008421427,0.05514674,0.93042994,0.00034831467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015590371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002822204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90799266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021910339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019489919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489690535","doi":"","title":"Re-Examining Contract and Unjust Enrichment: Anglo-Canadian Perspectives","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Restitution","score_opus":0.04885835430573912,"score_gpt":0.32105361594082277,"score_spread":0.2721952616350837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489690535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52093905,0.101399474,0.000007047161,0.059166677,0.0003162989,0.00029035404,0.000089902576,0.00001987704,0.31777132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98278904,0.015302411,0.00016153157,0.0009285281,0.0003859984,0.0000014114306,4.321204e-7,0.0000045749794,0.00042605266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907213,0.000060528302,0.00021152971,0.0001127184,0.00018440273,0.00035867625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870783,0.00007549738,0.000112992835,0.00004997769,0.00034253384,0.0007111497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005509245,0.00007150129,0.0001940709,0.00030491062,0.0011233315,0.0002067793,0.00014643872,0.00004681328,0.000060058548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041424745,0.00008394723,0.000041421936,0.0003512118,0.00021746726,0.00031544306,0.00000671203,0.00018140215,0.0000030819886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015138798,0.00009265365,0.013653597,0.000016420738,0.00058202434,0.0025851459,0.19044977,0.0000160788,0.000040162897,0.22787379,0.10477171,0.4599035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032721978,0.00010009174,0.2154958,0.00013569648,0.000049217804,0.00013699532,0.18824053,0.0000011943166,0.0000022081078,0.0020834303,0.5932456,0.0001819963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8088168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4884739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043728642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086812844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8639871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493288650","doi":"","title":"The Structure of Unjust Enrichment Law: Is Restitution a Right or a Remedy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Damages; Harm; Duty; Trespass; Order (exchange); Breach of contract; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04212962585686394,"score_gpt":0.3288795368211298,"score_spread":0.2867499109642659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493288650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0101581225,0.42987788,0.00010110578,0.03044657,0.00033165744,0.0041409046,0.00079348544,0.00011876974,0.5240315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9057135,0.09033274,0.00041856235,0.0017791281,0.00015408368,0.000022573728,0.0000063702223,0.000008708894,0.0015643348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882823,0.00012608395,0.00036483756,0.00015350341,0.0003510264,0.00017629702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910307,0.00009768426,0.0002490429,0.00035336037,0.00013335774,0.00006347987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031046945,0.000091949056,0.00024029272,0.0000088267525,0.00045954584,0.00002554931,0.00034744304,0.00005559618,0.00074997783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062950676,0.000051599833,0.00010532312,0.0003008862,0.00050396274,0.0001200475,0.000043972883,0.00009502923,0.000012228156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024563492,0.000038647173,0.0000135223445,0.00043546027,0.00001413807,7.451995e-7,0.0002132936,3.4035455e-7,0.00020440946,0.98446494,0.01120786,0.0034041826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006597499,0.000023402608,0.000033772834,0.000699335,0.00006102408,0.000001191212,0.000042360487,0.000005110379,0.0004398632,0.0032897359,0.995268,0.00007024296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002402587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014276011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004354825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040567153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82117313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493520628","doi":"","title":"The Many Dimensions of Private Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Popularity; Private law; Tort; Law; Philosophy of law; Political science; Commercial law; Simple (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.022599886654761356,"score_gpt":0.3115253591822438,"score_spread":0.2889254725274824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493520628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10977854,0.000045970275,0.0009396061,0.02976622,0.00006095131,0.0001869779,0.0000020815503,0.000050377086,0.8591693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960221,0.000064542655,0.00060897396,0.00020967172,0.00002648743,0.0000056604704,1.8537595e-7,0.0000014427816,0.003060915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997076,0.000010662579,0.00006196159,0.00004182528,0.0000936771,0.00008431899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977976,0.0000422889,0.000019776997,0.00010657018,0.000022367045,0.000029242054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014070662,0.000017882183,0.000024893237,0.0000029334208,0.0006058495,0.000018231405,0.00012739889,0.0000142073395,0.000029049497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001577638,0.0000091505035,0.000021266887,0.000079612895,0.00021577258,0.00003419663,0.000028775996,0.000026312853,0.00005054359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.7581075e-7,0.000009841435,0.000026916123,2.0591042e-7,0.0000014464385,4.3467907e-8,0.00045489313,0.000010736842,0.00026637825,0.99891615,0.00011039357,0.00020273255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045966834,0.0000036066385,0.0004269744,0.0000015642327,0.0000018836047,4.6358867e-8,0.00053002685,0.000002031048,0.0011476029,0.13361862,0.86420107,0.000020617581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054437895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056814062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8862436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014146647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034332195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8229418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495406419","doi":"","title":"Droit des successions.","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geology; History","score_opus":0.024967320805052318,"score_gpt":0.2892299153877778,"score_spread":0.2642625945827255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495406419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64977294,0.0044358694,0.005092368,0.030438375,0.00082130916,0.00045140067,0.00008127272,0.00017293595,0.30873355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347196,0.002390598,0.0043860176,0.00046072569,0.0013203718,0.00005844495,0.000013388444,0.000032620566,0.056618202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819803,0.00008569878,0.00033031017,0.00038492496,0.00023067697,0.0007703815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988774,0.00007520181,0.00013782253,0.000389803,0.000094355986,0.00042538796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004831566,0.00014027947,0.00024102817,0.000055698732,0.00091276114,0.00013964412,0.0005506857,0.0002604515,0.00082856504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011801866,0.00022413493,0.00020626347,0.00080863415,0.00082562736,0.0004306573,0.000100924226,0.00033791008,0.0017852561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036324889,0.00022766698,0.0020808359,0.00010175617,0.000020688874,0.000033827175,0.004355635,0.0004810059,0.000235164,0.9701591,0.00068195316,0.021618718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034976873,0.00004358137,0.00684058,0.00038271796,0.00006560297,0.000040984018,0.0011255116,0.00011349058,0.00037672458,0.7718181,0.21850844,0.00033450633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007147982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034292785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2849467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011537359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039602094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495504993","doi":"","title":"The Relationship between Judicial Remedies and the Separation of Powers: Collaborative Constitutionalism and the Suspended Declaration of Invalidity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Constitutionalism; Law; Irish; Political science; Separation of powers; Sociology; Constitution; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06986205527609547,"score_gpt":0.33705504200419933,"score_spread":0.2671929867281039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495504993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92140174,0.0061046006,0.004853117,0.028284231,0.00016897402,0.0013277797,0.000025200037,0.000014723853,0.037819657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970319,0.0026060226,0.000034145763,0.000021811255,0.00013499275,0.000010932012,0.0000021960207,0.0000020762373,0.00015590987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985082,0.00062677666,0.00027178798,0.0000689312,0.00025214965,0.0002721386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980485,0.0012430836,0.00034996087,0.00008184875,0.00025133888,0.000025309786],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059316247,0.000053328036,0.00011826868,0.000021397153,0.0016962852,0.0000492165,0.00015608498,0.00004787761,0.000004295864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011011586,0.000026668175,0.000036343165,0.0001999608,0.0027440372,0.00018253122,0.000026164233,0.00041138448,5.6565324e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011982173,0.000005286452,0.008886983,7.742219e-7,0.00004248995,1.8830619e-8,0.010383768,9.986857e-7,0.0000062370304,0.98020977,0.000030509804,0.00031336726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010283149,0.000033834433,0.021062752,0.0000070421793,0.000071741386,0.0000036167442,0.020673597,0.000011889201,0.0000685769,0.95555043,0.0014502794,0.00003793698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010424176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013065644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075630195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008798695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015588452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495708875","doi":"","title":"Vindicatory approach to the award of constitutional and public law damages : contemporary Commonwealth developments","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Damages; Commonwealth; Plaintiff; Political science; Jurisdiction; High Court; Charter; Common law; Constitution","score_opus":0.1572053411510131,"score_gpt":0.35008155756813136,"score_spread":0.19287621641711827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495708875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12281516,0.0025662908,0.0035590339,0.006641734,0.00022604049,0.00028129204,0.00020021827,0.000008935885,0.8637013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846923,0.000028031718,0.000787722,0.0002912447,0.00017455574,0.0000062343092,0.000004315005,0.0000024500396,0.00023619893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999081,0.0001270293,0.0002900469,0.000070541144,0.0003064279,0.00012493636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910146,0.00013235264,0.00027572992,0.00005263964,0.00025704273,0.00018076765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073429977,0.000068594374,0.00015041,0.000047789752,0.00048047933,0.0000650848,0.00027890384,0.000028838464,0.000019920262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029475503,0.000046295576,0.00003453625,0.00008462266,0.0010903738,0.00028639892,0.00008264364,0.00012869186,0.000010804544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016194017,0.00012234219,0.012784572,0.0000023876262,0.00006984553,1.1943797e-7,0.01693147,0.000002465885,0.0000223762,0.9689938,0.0009372016,0.00011725686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024420294,0.000024047757,0.0049258685,0.000018569928,0.000008937894,0.0000072147122,0.022243896,0.000010358837,0.000028602302,0.0020845393,0.97033274,0.00007103723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002771672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014862751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042115444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015658443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4017528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496559376","doi":"10.1093/ajlh/50.2.200","title":"The Joint Venture Fable","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; General partnership; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Dissent; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.012692699818560221,"score_gpt":0.26600731683952467,"score_spread":0.25331461702096447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496559376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4969216,0.0024410018,0.00044527088,0.04940888,0.0057135606,0.00020602478,0.000004103234,0.00005014384,0.4448094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891165,0.00011687986,0.0005469404,0.0004381882,0.00086577696,0.0000023225025,1.1580768e-7,0.0000066629054,0.008906597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991957,0.00007182591,0.00020628195,0.000059877497,0.00029582117,0.000170507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909794,0.000088060086,0.00037504896,0.00014518638,0.00015146284,0.0001423232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007492849,0.000050040733,0.000111814756,0.000031195366,0.00048259067,0.000035339584,0.00035313028,0.000022135457,0.00012505091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014031108,0.000034207416,0.00011080381,0.000107647684,0.0011451773,0.0001575506,0.000018069815,0.00049736776,0.000024908864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039590857,0.00011446822,0.00055129075,0.0000022173924,0.000046621284,0.000022622606,0.0121398335,0.000011023414,0.0075931596,0.6383461,0.23119983,0.10993327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004890634,0.000053177784,0.00072478445,0.0000027652277,0.000008463141,0.000011490256,0.0019369661,0.0000023017546,0.000024979126,0.00033383988,0.9968058,0.000046550704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022487487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016844284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7656059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022815964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005599549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42194533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498389001","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1128","title":"Normativity, Fairness, and the Problem of Factual Uncertainty","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Normative; Appeal; Harm; Liability; Law; Law and economics; Res ipsa loquitur; Supreme court; Tort; Economic Justice; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.014576078774932862,"score_gpt":0.28526196936748044,"score_spread":0.27068589059254755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498389001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019477848,0.00017995245,0.0012964052,0.023425506,0.000032511754,0.00022082389,0.000007585168,0.000019308789,0.9553401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985472,0.00017054653,0.00065298605,0.00028275346,0.00013734553,0.0000025643824,5.6639504e-7,0.00000244773,0.00020360736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915224,0.00014879982,0.00019417611,0.00006882625,0.00026684412,0.00016910152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994727,0.000112563444,0.00015589809,0.00008209114,0.00008833279,0.000088434084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009576652,0.0000595775,0.0001230794,0.000012605533,0.001039043,0.00014057301,0.00022752659,0.00004089109,0.00005965722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022602842,0.000036352874,0.000058286976,0.00008573991,0.00045985193,0.00022746452,0.000029545945,0.00020761196,0.000005404653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012808641,0.000029614557,0.00006368315,0.0000019824784,0.0000070734973,5.5742674e-7,0.0040079113,0.000056776265,0.000046847108,0.986762,0.00018222917,0.008828524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009464196,0.000047821744,0.0014234503,0.000026394566,0.000026208403,0.000025110876,0.0029532576,0.00014044136,0.00011697203,0.9256273,0.06855483,0.00011181356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025633799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055086352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97906935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026194677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006761596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498640858","doi":"","title":"Contractual termination of leases: lessons from the Commonwealth - Part 1","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Lease; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05876855554671652,"score_gpt":0.3887174688803831,"score_spread":0.3299489133336666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498640858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3986839,0.000118045165,0.000995985,0.23264956,0.00010028904,0.00046053613,0.00011813984,0.00008433626,0.36678922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720097,0.000051995306,0.00010204239,0.0014226078,0.0001573381,0.0000046063337,0.000010525113,0.0000012313993,0.0010486664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995245,0.00005973992,0.000110870256,0.00006877372,0.00014242655,0.000093697454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994754,0.0002590027,0.00006195851,0.00012590401,0.000039301707,0.000038417587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023614216,0.000030832023,0.000058163056,0.000005734717,0.00030999808,0.000029865038,0.0001799192,0.000028652308,0.00026425673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007852513,0.000020331852,0.00002848251,0.00007966294,0.00010221331,0.000081826416,0.000008825493,0.000050265648,0.000020887506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027451038,0.00009725953,0.00081732596,3.4603616e-7,0.0000034677719,1.3111215e-7,0.0046336176,0.000002733593,0.00014411243,0.9355994,0.01297418,0.04572472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018022448,0.000026212883,0.107661776,0.000008952602,0.000013766103,7.745193e-8,0.006575692,0.00008203067,0.00034041834,0.020914976,0.86412627,0.00006958489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009720164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065500746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9146844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001745468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082031824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500014366","doi":"","title":"Party Autonomy, Private Autonomy, and Freedom of Contract","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Law; Constraint (computer-aided design); Political science; Economics; Business; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01615223223609084,"score_gpt":0.2776465826371781,"score_spread":0.26149435040108726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500014366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26305246,0.000027321774,0.0002613736,0.0069959164,0.00019015711,0.00029019578,0.000036727426,0.00004052551,0.7291053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869657,0.000003762328,0.00031086802,0.00035292306,0.00021215892,0.000010233659,9.489295e-7,0.000003654318,0.00040887343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998931,0.000046101195,0.00014076379,0.00021719062,0.00022497796,0.00043996758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912053,0.000060923772,0.00008095006,0.000121209225,0.00010199523,0.0005143803],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010907158,0.00006285922,0.00011756241,0.00007120494,0.0015084277,0.00012751784,0.00042589038,0.00006122182,0.000086506676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021848798,0.000064798565,0.00002982574,0.00047998197,0.0023351333,0.00026189332,0.00003991531,0.00008157833,0.000014763709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.679508e-7,0.0000047640083,0.010457624,0.0000016658429,0.0000015284661,2.1104132e-7,0.0052065095,6.011938e-7,0.00026999114,0.9722038,0.00014281215,0.011710129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009750361,0.000010073874,0.059871737,0.0000040234218,0.000005365037,1.8304719e-7,0.0007861968,0.00022133981,0.00007906925,0.003736388,0.9350681,0.000120020726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15291943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13826543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045412173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031334849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500207795","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 Terms","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Charter; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Judicial review; Administrative discretion; Standard of review; Commission; Human rights; Constitutional law; Discretion; Public administration","score_opus":0.03779567698418788,"score_gpt":0.29898921258039274,"score_spread":0.26119353559620484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500207795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84139097,0.00009567937,0.000046212215,0.0023292124,0.0000705661,0.00032432098,0.000044280332,0.000028289536,0.15567045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905348,0.000050248567,0.00066947634,0.00027255705,0.00006242,6.435466e-7,0.000009093011,0.0000080225955,0.008392758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850935,0.00013989543,0.00018145707,0.0002945225,0.00040419828,0.0004706017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914587,0.0001982056,0.00014763427,0.00021913326,0.000078912155,0.00021024229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019359512,0.00012933223,0.00016912143,0.0001087923,0.0012921119,0.00005445069,0.0005322531,0.00017574386,0.0001902099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006405078,0.00012949349,0.000060929484,0.0003990321,0.00079401024,0.00054820935,0.00019191894,0.0003462304,0.0000750678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023739148,0.0002818635,0.6965167,0.000025023583,0.00007096561,0.00007279125,0.041513696,0.0000057330462,0.0010911174,0.2546087,0.0011104814,0.004465554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005353099,0.000021465812,0.6863465,0.000027704114,0.000016339789,0.0000025589693,0.0108691,0.0000013083602,0.00026079305,0.0013963938,0.30034164,0.00018091802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032465607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09194141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29923117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020277585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018508632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500452805","doi":"10.1002/iir.1237","title":"The Extra‐Territoriality of the Statutory Stay in an English Administration – Revisited","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Statutory law; Administration (probate law); Scope (computer science); Law; Judgement; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09543685748338061,"score_gpt":0.4147048412610635,"score_spread":0.3192679837776829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500452805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3992461,0.10724414,0.00034853342,0.08871871,0.021676723,0.0072932905,0.0005590175,0.00025196618,0.3746615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98718804,0.010927046,0.00007640439,0.00036771837,0.00083102036,0.00007171897,0.000019740251,0.000004957428,0.0005133796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985232,0.00035438538,0.00039735757,0.00012769025,0.0004913393,0.00010607672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988418,0.000102348604,0.0002143382,0.0002681463,0.0005107913,0.00006254946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019066229,0.000058522462,0.00010584914,0.000014007277,0.00014251776,0.000066765475,0.0006828906,0.00003167042,0.000042768905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010115816,0.000036978425,0.000065929344,0.00021940493,0.00014503035,0.0002807494,0.000048724312,0.0001250446,0.000005559593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002221335,0.00026158887,0.01902306,0.00011014041,0.000020736501,9.928827e-7,0.0062080156,0.0000056660956,0.00004212769,0.9481406,0.011090714,0.0150741255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082018945,0.0000153147,0.0072429636,0.00029564125,0.000007573419,1.759696e-7,0.0002893381,0.000015143323,0.000012730285,0.0028523712,0.98913765,0.00004910256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000705244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003414173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014869987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004440758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19051886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500474037","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2296451","title":"William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Vol. 4 (1769)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.013460444363381105,"score_gpt":0.26804939765348157,"score_spread":0.25458895329010045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500474037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8538314,0.0006947153,0.00071992807,0.0914107,0.0002836222,0.00056497677,0.0000070947585,0.000035309993,0.052452225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932145,0.0013543314,0.000018679364,0.0007253136,0.0003971369,0.000017710197,0.0000011542414,0.0000069717976,0.004264239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984352,0.00013231272,0.00017487617,0.000083112434,0.0002797173,0.0008947865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928606,0.00024246304,0.00012995391,0.00014237729,0.0001385505,0.000060593327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012974263,0.00007161173,0.000095003066,0.000024955756,0.0007789897,0.000084609535,0.00038354282,0.000041976153,0.00036988544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001557485,0.00004518713,0.000073234696,0.00013787647,0.00023771523,0.00014083418,0.000026893853,0.00079028023,0.00012286889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005560039,0.00004838265,0.0015949644,7.0480814e-7,0.000035688932,6.568206e-8,0.0019277519,0.000005679298,0.000059617076,0.9862742,0.004679547,0.0053678467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002674362,0.00012511431,0.0013271502,0.000008681546,0.0000149457,0.0000035054081,0.010375002,0.000013271935,0.00015071707,0.4097637,0.5778612,0.000089287685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004539297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016764298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5765105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003111002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007414786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9354872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502640439","doi":"","title":"The Impact of U.S. Tort Law in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.02515195250760102,"score_gpt":0.2416356845456835,"score_spread":0.21648373203808247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502640439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3939424,0.000026103051,0.0000110246,0.0005592654,0.0000381194,0.00015645013,0.00010626719,0.000022196858,0.6051382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965644,0.000028828035,0.000014536886,0.00001763975,0.000030391886,0.0000014175587,0.000010971124,0.000009889184,0.0033219538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988914,0.000058468824,0.00021067772,0.00018918022,0.00023949136,0.0004107461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990749,0.00018616316,0.000099414356,0.00033823278,0.00011974807,0.0001815726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015803795,0.00013757421,0.00020083057,0.00009556951,0.0005604394,0.000056484627,0.0007499712,0.000046674086,0.00008473888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006521014,0.00011219837,0.00015960516,0.000814044,0.00040143565,0.00048193903,0.00022355646,0.00016570346,0.00001016722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075571596,0.00015167893,0.17755036,0.0000034042278,0.000061977684,0.000032066615,0.001551417,0.000044937573,0.00002093247,0.8153062,0.0028054223,0.0023960443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009750636,0.000159724,0.15422551,0.000036310794,0.000030268628,0.0000052120013,0.017527033,0.00013013027,0.00011159641,0.0019212117,0.82431614,0.00056180713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9697854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98298335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82151073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085366203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013533453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4575317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502843092","doi":"","title":"Dismissals Due to Business Reasons in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01408840605728378,"score_gpt":0.2723866506233968,"score_spread":0.258298244566113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502843092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3621755,0.000004064128,0.0026503175,0.06840374,0.00008280602,0.0001642279,0.000004464541,0.000026391312,0.5664885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943882,0.0000018603952,0.0003556151,0.0011303396,0.00006959453,0.000017141074,8.7630394e-7,0.0000024060166,0.0040339497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995571,0.00003004417,0.00006394956,0.00008665523,0.00011887317,0.00014339715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996904,0.00006208093,0.000010346598,0.00009524404,0.000036698348,0.00010519389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018265056,0.00002843679,0.000053280295,0.000012191415,0.00011409862,0.00002246312,0.0001348475,0.000013213767,0.00021625911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016444761,0.00002504582,0.000005974249,0.00032150123,0.0000139352205,0.000036461057,0.000023021606,0.000026160698,0.000050727096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010722082,0.000016787466,0.01959036,0.0000022454294,0.0000011524835,0.0000017198755,0.0009851361,0.00012706536,0.000040412244,0.94032425,0.02642982,0.012479995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031322226,6.3608593e-7,0.19128543,0.000003497812,6.342723e-7,1.0323729e-7,0.0005848405,0.000047197664,0.000015931064,0.0010140415,0.8069626,0.000053739048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99789363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99971056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9393102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014784095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060016924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23678856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503329074","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Accountability Transformed","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.014126027353095628,"score_gpt":0.3208394058081857,"score_spread":0.30671337845509006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503329074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.754809,0.0015526275,0.008743612,0.05141026,0.00020774711,0.00040384682,0.0000045498255,0.0001400427,0.18272828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511784,0.0024444459,0.000050094503,0.00033537575,0.00048368523,0.0000029973717,0.000001109053,0.0000041356234,0.0015603085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788004,0.0000713326,0.00016770093,0.00011977243,0.00026559472,0.001495537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996467,0.000031135954,0.000053225114,0.00010717893,0.00006354791,0.00009819018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021418338,0.00006816689,0.00008681013,0.00003124361,0.0008196283,0.000079808764,0.0002991562,0.0000623351,0.000101620266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004718453,0.000060210037,0.000095400406,0.0001956906,0.000055586963,0.00029308695,0.000004621684,0.00094296655,0.00004322461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009833571,0.00006504369,0.00026077355,4.2940428e-7,0.0000103306575,2.6203185e-7,0.0016065299,0.0000039360566,0.00011993612,0.91303015,0.00011022629,0.084782556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022240062,0.00008087648,0.0031003102,0.0000032442763,0.0000132209125,0.000016707145,0.005695183,0.000007918454,0.000034371278,0.811189,0.1795218,0.00011500052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062647415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012769193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24030882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000853547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028351685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71255094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503976820","doi":"","title":"An Indeterminate Theory of Canadian Corporate Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Shareholder; Corporate law; Shareholder primacy; Agency cost; Fiduciary; Opportunism; Law and economics; Corporation; Supreme court; Business; Jurisprudence; Stakeholder; Economics; Accounting; Market economy; Law; Political science; Finance; Duty","score_opus":0.02164543958398983,"score_gpt":0.2733346287129741,"score_spread":0.25168918912898425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503976820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75175387,0.000227939,0.0034569828,0.0039554713,0.00015920142,0.00017659509,0.000008449454,0.00003338365,0.24022812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980444,0.00029084607,0.000046380104,0.0001899052,0.00021355152,0.000002108158,0.0000013468604,0.0000073696924,0.0012041212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835104,0.00023062881,0.00013686718,0.000085044085,0.00014572046,0.0010506745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993946,0.000033571323,0.00015653565,0.00012372549,0.000082437284,0.00020910484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033120653,0.000053106392,0.00008191265,0.00011049549,0.0005754548,0.000049498365,0.00033082342,0.00005497881,0.000041455754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034559158,0.000048200924,0.00004045866,0.00023874943,0.00017570797,0.00017167057,0.000007211407,0.00052482885,0.00001778822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030621247,0.00001093386,0.00034724563,5.0279584e-7,0.000008182946,2.46002e-7,0.00063027017,0.0000068475993,0.00012999588,0.9852908,0.000009369431,0.013562535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010168687,0.00008361892,0.0005084391,0.0000033434087,0.000009322546,0.0000080235595,0.0022861925,0.000029862951,0.00009084929,0.9037326,0.09307554,0.00007051077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16237481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8880932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7257183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032326925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028305114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.843203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504571867","doi":"","title":"Proprietary Remedies in Insolvency: A Comparison of the Restatement Third on Restitution and Unjust Enrichment with English and Commonwealth Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Commonwealth; Bankruptcy; Unjust enrichment; Insolvency; Law; English law; Political science; Constructive; Constructive trust; Common law; Law and economics; Economics; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.03398964145090017,"score_gpt":0.3017995118716932,"score_spread":0.267809870420793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504571867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98006684,0.001034188,0.00009510112,0.0029559173,0.000053495733,0.00034972656,0.0000013886875,0.000010150996,0.01543321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974385,0.0023067796,0.00007612415,0.000060729926,0.000044119137,0.0000091895745,5.325409e-7,0.000003265592,0.000060761027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988455,0.00013226923,0.00019792163,0.00010347164,0.0002449295,0.00047587324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996191,0.000027357268,0.00015283751,0.00009369599,0.00005946357,0.000047547535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012555132,0.000063162384,0.000107650456,0.000029405115,0.00046929068,0.000020979467,0.00013097264,0.000032918,0.0000015165507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027905635,0.000039250623,0.000014058116,0.00013154517,0.00034646151,0.0001337417,0.000033874447,0.0006504296,2.438599e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005759446,0.000108638975,0.036578685,0.000006292777,0.000013661556,2.702683e-7,0.022953814,0.000007822498,0.000023027591,0.93925744,0.000014788893,0.0009779688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028372314,0.003576826,0.22397108,0.00053240155,0.00012547908,0.000022028082,0.160923,0.000102439226,0.00081446173,0.5518672,0.05473169,0.00049618795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071654827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1496465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38739026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029045736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000803716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505790278","doi":"","title":"Salomon Redux: The Moralities of Business","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seattle University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Commonwealth; Law; Institution; Colonialism; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Persona; Management; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Humanities","score_opus":0.048182382162363535,"score_gpt":0.2978198820948689,"score_spread":0.2496374999325054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505790278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075963787,0.03635335,0.000114984425,0.02857708,0.0001680306,0.0006439676,0.000048823786,0.00006274924,0.92643464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95144296,0.040753055,0.00011199273,0.0006004781,0.00011495726,9.3964394e-7,0.0000060896355,0.0000036958052,0.006965818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951667,0.00011592832,0.00006102734,0.00005223126,0.00012534845,0.00012879664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958825,0.000052931264,0.00005279858,0.00016325903,0.00009278266,0.000049966133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035158318,0.00003743091,0.00009819939,0.000007001307,0.00036591478,0.000006878382,0.00023522366,0.000021012855,0.00020634744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027070299,0.000028184195,0.000049755286,0.00029168,0.0003339518,0.00019021417,0.000054435415,0.000043018757,0.000052232375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.203078e-7,0.000016674505,0.00021853257,0.00013138761,0.000004859717,1.2470171e-7,0.0005497046,3.514664e-7,0.000003963368,0.9951542,0.0032784364,0.0006411561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024988643,0.0000013804505,0.0010334534,0.00014852438,0.00003763453,2.0737676e-7,0.0006492721,1.9155149e-7,0.00001053079,0.00019424163,0.997862,0.000037609832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070799654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069067866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99495995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003940595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049471124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506490462","doi":"","title":"Can the Reasonable Person Still Be 'Highly Offended'? An Invitation to Consider the Civil Law Tradition’s Personality Rights-Based Approach to Tort Privacy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Context (archaeology); Privacy laws of the United States; Political science; Doctrine; Information privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.06528980324307203,"score_gpt":0.30447930755447855,"score_spread":0.2391895043114065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506490462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7041711,0.0002473316,0.006173539,0.23978603,0.00016162104,0.0014615414,0.000059382204,0.000103050006,0.047836367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227,0.000036045993,0.00032389731,0.0052975263,0.0005723648,0.00009712539,0.000015456917,0.00001564852,0.0013719673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706113,0.0004569122,0.00021921047,0.00029766638,0.00071618945,0.0012488981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989166,0.00015187972,0.00012311843,0.000316041,0.00020895783,0.0002834028],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024949806,0.00015705511,0.00014869054,0.000043007356,0.003701501,0.00019113677,0.0006321192,0.0000714377,0.000041959272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010873992,0.000098419674,0.00011791501,0.00040594535,0.0002950491,0.00027342266,0.00002002138,0.00091365597,0.000013369276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023259725,0.00013192608,0.00015494047,0.0000014271178,0.000032861888,7.993474e-7,0.030108457,0.00025209904,0.000055402874,0.96608067,0.002941831,0.0002163504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000977541,0.0004988427,0.011388544,0.00002051547,0.00012632889,0.00024171024,0.0746638,0.00044201213,0.0001497053,0.30112544,0.60968655,0.00067902054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027998183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1268469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6649552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014227476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034669205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99759555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506793606","doi":"","title":"Self-Government and the Inalienability of Aboriginal Title","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Paternalism; Surrender; Government (linguistics); Crown (dentistry); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.012636171928551675,"score_gpt":0.28778568727519155,"score_spread":0.2751495153466399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506793606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018630434,0.000032943753,0.00003920827,0.0028705106,0.000009978377,0.000047125646,0.0000011997972,0.000006621418,0.97836196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887683,0.00006923283,0.00024749618,0.000044923203,0.000019804076,0.000001572203,1.7848032e-8,3.9031707e-7,0.0108483005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984616,0.000010666446,0.000023893968,0.000022739994,0.00007267666,0.000023849447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99991757,0.00002181305,0.000008207761,0.000037004054,0.000006044544,0.00000937917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010434195,0.00000839276,0.000016173506,7.8248104e-7,0.000049644546,0.0000054484103,0.000031382293,0.00000577641,0.0009961486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000057104794,0.000004803099,0.000006596286,0.000023784345,0.000081034996,0.000010491452,0.000005154114,0.0000115093835,0.000036619305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1982458e-7,0.000010432414,0.00039196925,0.0000010020069,9.618277e-7,9.111242e-9,0.00097212207,4.018945e-8,0.0000016048713,0.99548054,0.0022016796,0.0009393408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041772775,0.000001378553,0.00046872586,2.2290972e-7,0.0000018669454,2.9874816e-8,0.00022157971,0.00009639802,0.000021457656,0.00199196,0.9971463,0.000008286544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038217087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009874664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99494463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009489683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005470194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507354143","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2010.00167.x","title":"The case of ‘losses in any event’: a question of duty, cause or damages?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Damages; Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Tort; Argument (complex analysis); Duty; Event (particle physics); Relevance (law); Appeal; Scope (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Duty of care; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Business; Liability; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.052535518684242756,"score_gpt":0.4218381476761031,"score_spread":0.36930262899186034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507354143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990975,0.0004583549,0.000009969131,0.0044527105,0.0001315716,0.0001834071,0.000010579572,0.000012495893,0.0037659088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980824,0.0003432914,0.000093688635,0.000015103105,0.00007883837,0.00002996157,2.3568104e-7,0.0000029099317,0.0013535898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994195,0.00006970928,0.00018918146,0.00008576658,0.00010764252,0.00012821284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992776,0.00033166847,0.00010174688,0.0001352328,0.00012959182,0.00002414724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057951803,0.00004927424,0.000113566275,0.000020761381,0.000382882,0.000020731963,0.00013038103,0.000027033959,0.000011119014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076190126,0.000030012883,0.000029605559,0.00022807122,0.00050770136,0.00010768204,0.000075129734,0.00011248075,0.0000023923644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030120385,0.0001388345,0.011394117,0.000036758353,0.00005944736,0.00007171823,0.013608769,0.0000104420615,0.00089473766,0.96593744,0.0009195614,0.006898074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011451343,0.00024568243,0.09241339,0.00018620951,0.00014986287,0.000065778135,0.11291526,0.0001230211,0.007922121,0.030947395,0.75339067,0.0004954584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034582563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5067804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93499005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021063357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007731959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9718462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508417898","doi":"","title":"Standards of Review in Irish Administrative Law after 'Meadows'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Scrutiny; Law; Standard of review; Irish; Expansive; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01606707249915404,"score_gpt":0.3702382768156792,"score_spread":0.35417120431652516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508417898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42145157,0.03717845,0.0012387264,0.03713649,0.00046658586,0.0012516425,0.000100305144,0.000052467647,0.5011238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98113686,0.017650876,0.00007050114,0.00026271242,0.0001554314,0.000016131504,6.948521e-7,0.0000055372734,0.0007012841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983798,0.00009187221,0.00025534444,0.00009968997,0.00037064875,0.0008026409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994488,0.000036598263,0.00012784956,0.000111507616,0.00020253834,0.00007275534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033398285,0.00006362581,0.00014465813,0.000026201404,0.00015889674,0.000036718506,0.00023653962,0.00005809379,0.0002588764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015736019,0.000054912198,0.000073835305,0.00020348653,0.00019272453,0.0002045857,0.000017437727,0.0013855164,0.000007704182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013202355,0.00004847637,0.00079830526,0.00001554507,0.000011959529,0.0000013246852,0.00064194424,1.983669e-7,0.00010326142,0.9940241,0.0002608702,0.00408083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033866605,0.00013744885,0.0010868437,0.00022406912,0.000029919083,0.000025465975,0.0026496125,0.000001544131,0.00011422469,0.25183278,0.7433903,0.0001691249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010213051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12562951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74312943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031951544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00448329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8903255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1508717189","doi":"10.21991/c9c65b","title":"SUPREME COURT SCEPTICAL ABOUT PRESUMPTION OF CROWN IMMUNITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Skepticism; Qualified immunity; Sovereign immunity; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Philosophy; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056661407719705084,"score_gpt":0.3059521306292208,"score_spread":0.2492907229095157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1508717189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06783114,0.0006301317,0.1408098,0.0041492786,0.0015687589,0.0014061182,0.00062479306,0.0003874524,0.78259254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575293,0.00013048372,0.0029285422,0.0002764228,0.00014705335,0.00008984031,0.00007780236,0.000008360694,0.00058858335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752283,0.00013527779,0.0006567015,0.00038708784,0.000617497,0.000680619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827063,0.00014867824,0.00024406683,0.0004459415,0.0005807704,0.00030989235],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006960852,0.00023428511,0.00030734375,0.00016456729,0.0021352808,0.0000638941,0.00058810716,0.00026344936,0.0017561016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004903982,0.0002380816,0.00024966925,0.00040456795,0.01206676,0.0007657953,0.00018944418,0.0003217385,0.00033445252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006685427,0.000297765,0.018946525,0.000014582021,0.000050007322,0.0000032035325,0.00067828904,0.000045992845,0.0004909121,0.9767717,0.002020052,0.0006141046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023511085,0.00015668354,0.0383194,0.00032656558,0.00019839662,0.000075499556,0.009745431,0.00050039066,0.0032166028,0.12891528,0.81502885,0.0011658092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022948203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001201494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021832906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019088446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510516166","doi":"","title":"Peoples Department Stores V. Wise and the 'Best Interests of the Corporation'","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Corporation; Shareholder; Economic Justice; Normative; Law; Political science; High Court; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Management; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.012044497461059242,"score_gpt":0.2807983144685046,"score_spread":0.2687538170074454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510516166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96292585,0.0022234658,0.0004902852,0.029736668,0.00006879376,0.00023664992,0.0000033061106,0.0000072656567,0.00430773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944815,0.0035071569,0.000027686645,0.0000939132,0.00025828605,0.000007916059,3.1265583e-7,0.0000034590437,0.0016197386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906445,0.0001300414,0.00014145463,0.00006121077,0.00018827368,0.00041459073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957407,0.00009301761,0.00014972237,0.00009763239,0.000053043506,0.000032514617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011127583,0.000046675526,0.00006613002,0.00001297347,0.00066309125,0.00005947364,0.00025363654,0.000022423994,0.000013134438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008401734,0.000024178127,0.000053459382,0.00009400115,0.00033093788,0.00010997438,0.000038518945,0.00035679137,0.0000055916294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013220438,0.00002540693,0.0026791522,6.6449684e-7,0.000019764937,2.211999e-8,0.0023085384,0.000023132397,0.000024259616,0.9888288,0.0001181551,0.0059588947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021397283,0.0001464016,0.013597373,0.00004512556,0.00012857048,0.00005875466,0.04719508,0.00020195535,0.00031366522,0.5815809,0.354358,0.00023450707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063695025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16689824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40724793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021794114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011963099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8483037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511124634","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1168","title":"Narrowing Interjurisdictional Immunity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Federalism; Law; Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Political science; Sovereign immunity; Qualified immunity; Legislation; Federal jurisdiction; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06306659848464101,"score_gpt":0.34385479943709313,"score_spread":0.2807882009524521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511124634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012485806,0.06954778,0.00046622887,0.03425819,0.00042833784,0.0009905221,0.00002727182,0.00031721895,0.88147867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93537456,0.057800416,0.0003665658,0.003943249,0.00030394504,0.000065948974,0.000016868373,0.000010528968,0.002117901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904007,0.00014145795,0.00021151337,0.00013493048,0.00027965137,0.00019235021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944687,0.000054352462,0.000055444,0.00023155945,0.000111968715,0.000099829],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005892867,0.00007355248,0.00015797873,0.000010825596,0.0011523106,0.000020474494,0.00029285904,0.000037534097,0.0010775606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000761698,0.00006804721,0.00011976323,0.00018994955,0.00028501233,0.0002077953,0.000057448106,0.00015772827,0.00039032352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001222251,0.000057897007,0.00037028923,0.00013428631,0.000016337222,0.0000035113512,0.001094839,8.094196e-7,0.000039596103,0.9735213,0.023174161,0.0015857443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042895634,0.00000534235,0.00032500474,0.0003296041,0.000013661887,0.0000056974563,0.000046245208,0.0000023482041,0.00001138259,0.0010381559,0.9980966,0.00008309423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024575891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006766107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007153671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014169479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514673998","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.014","title":"The dilution of the trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dilution; Psychology; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.02495265036763457,"score_gpt":0.22103523534357347,"score_spread":0.1960825849759389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514673998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002962679,0.000061952305,0.00003416319,0.00035754452,0.00015643712,0.00046421427,0.00007503733,0.000028662176,0.99852574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02148629,0.0001686016,0.000007545842,0.00002196165,0.000118827214,0.0000011259725,0.0000025342324,0.00000877107,0.97818434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929285,0.000050031387,0.00010382392,0.00015025391,0.00025274878,0.00015028907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908185,0.00008881415,0.00020790055,0.00041926108,0.00014252048,0.000059670885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013662103,0.00010165202,0.00010903249,0.000017360204,0.0012073081,0.000044576118,0.0007874586,0.00016314819,0.000008496389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015805797,0.000071084025,0.00015901604,0.000008874416,0.0008926398,0.000045696142,0.00025993423,0.00023039621,0.000017145201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003451364,0.0000021280957,0.000001918129,0.0000047074063,0.000019911018,4.0634075e-7,0.00018552766,5.356821e-7,0.000010877374,0.97832143,0.020316571,0.00113253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006504218,0.0000031159605,0.00009837961,0.000023705934,0.00005338455,1.9135008e-7,0.00016325305,0.000008709757,0.00004440077,0.00013569542,0.9993184,0.00008572261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003429043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013051521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013029393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016940884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92857605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516496604","doi":"10.7202/1045921ar","title":"LA MODIFICATION ET LA TERMINAISON DES FIDUCIES PAR LES TRIBUNAUX DU QUÉBEC","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04698786017528817,"score_gpt":0.31454648249214956,"score_spread":0.2675586223168614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516496604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8012793,0.0046237046,0.0040809275,0.055339243,0.00048149572,0.0004877195,0.00007978155,0.000118955184,0.13350886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98534846,0.0027690679,0.0012009937,0.00013202902,0.00041316843,0.00008489712,0.000014964221,0.000023654991,0.010012754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800146,0.0008507258,0.00030952433,0.00034453243,0.00016636749,0.00032738686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985502,0.00070143485,0.00017349132,0.0003131956,0.00013005156,0.00013163417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012620237,0.0001856469,0.00022399133,0.00003799127,0.0009408388,0.00021903244,0.00028687264,0.00026339773,0.00031390417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081404834,0.0001935982,0.0001429454,0.00035424024,0.00085844495,0.00036122248,0.00004591102,0.00026499227,0.00028490784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058143196,0.00028712247,0.016789455,0.00008677158,0.000022648712,0.000006517743,0.019117469,0.0002485504,0.00018561356,0.9273193,0.0019525794,0.03397819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002091996,0.000023692388,0.029274292,0.00007812581,0.00006811655,0.00002005958,0.0015696279,0.00044478866,0.00014924133,0.0059064208,0.962026,0.00023044237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.081428126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049998913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9600734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027497692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005573171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9673361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517684064","doi":"","title":"Reasonable Expectations and the Interpretation of Contracts Across Legal Traditions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Duty; Meaning (existential); Good faith; Law; Epistemology; Faith; Fair dealing; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Positive economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007972653095379907,"score_gpt":0.30074654689407376,"score_spread":0.29277389379869384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517684064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8748262,0.0036915725,0.029274993,0.054377414,0.000112855945,0.00049867755,0.000016778493,0.00004526596,0.03715627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975258,0.0013034237,0.000064172644,0.0001132541,0.00013533214,0.000007865912,0.0000018095867,0.0000029424937,0.0008453811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886405,0.000110187786,0.0001758876,0.00007312321,0.00016297425,0.0006137979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952203,0.00013842103,0.00013043372,0.00006843705,0.00009163426,0.00004907042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012091602,0.000048725124,0.00009073678,0.00002027778,0.00093997706,0.00010768748,0.00014771573,0.00003162812,0.00000841859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001253886,0.000035443125,0.00006071888,0.00014951697,0.00024691215,0.00030937628,0.0000042026636,0.0004634442,0.000002880037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027106684,0.000028417619,0.000016353924,2.9278152e-7,0.000016048927,1.3168477e-7,0.0121642975,0.0000186741,0.000048952526,0.9749609,0.000035924044,0.012682856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001243168,0.000114389106,0.002092633,0.000015549482,0.00004329352,0.000060318616,0.09808961,0.0007126565,0.00004197321,0.88830745,0.009175703,0.00010323368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055268285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005175299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12269965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016350785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006893995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72296387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517743952","doi":"","title":"The Conceptual Foundations of France’s Fiducie Faced with the Trust of the Common Law: Between the Law of Contract and Property Law (Les Fondements Conceptuels de La Fiducie Française Face au Trust de La Common Law: Entre Droit Des Contrats et Droit Des Biens)","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Property law; Common law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Numerus clausus; Property (philosophy); Face (sociological concept); Rescission; Law and economics; Political science; Civil code; Appropriation; Trust law; Property rights; Sociology; Commercial law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology; Duty","score_opus":0.01391727670167818,"score_gpt":0.29023965455185985,"score_spread":0.27632237785018166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517743952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96043885,0.008964056,0.0011278145,0.008752129,0.000045022105,0.0009824915,0.00015532512,0.000015661757,0.019518642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964806,0.0018952932,0.000053862568,0.0005734852,0.00013032106,0.000028290637,0.0000045230186,0.000024096877,0.0008095285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495333,0.0020524461,0.00067790056,0.00025589432,0.00060557784,0.0014548565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618757,0.0021622349,0.00081621314,0.00042751807,0.0002636816,0.00014280007],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049712886,0.00030336567,0.00050109084,0.000016451964,0.0041077677,0.00026357715,0.0011745535,0.0002281375,0.000028779796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081090206,0.00014742404,0.00023257328,0.00034008836,0.01828085,0.00040131985,0.00008616856,0.0018100827,0.0000011679989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070156755,0.00021032273,0.014420325,0.000014556764,0.00030600358,6.4308693e-7,0.021486491,0.0002178068,0.00066190487,0.954374,0.000024875515,0.008212923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004064476,0.0012088655,0.04702973,0.000452906,0.0009868215,0.000115461284,0.050168745,0.00032703884,0.0051939753,0.7587973,0.1311257,0.0005290109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04228736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11997598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19557673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055676274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022448197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99718875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519716147","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4499","title":"The Merits of “Merits” Review: A Comparative Look at the Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Adjudication; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Enforcement; Legitimacy; Administrative law; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1242210924432735,"score_gpt":0.4465505210113872,"score_spread":0.3223294285681137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519716147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46833235,0.003171573,0.00018996354,0.13163248,0.0008684764,0.006106866,0.0005020696,0.00008571752,0.3891105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876671,0.000627254,0.00030596927,0.00072442816,0.00031245945,0.00013952322,0.0000059227623,0.000010243742,0.010207143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984289,0.00018290126,0.00041819786,0.00021381151,0.0004744689,0.000281733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811745,0.00062486023,0.00035971383,0.00042466106,0.0003243453,0.0001489804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096239237,0.0001252098,0.00027551546,0.000023262393,0.0007188083,0.000093027986,0.0011799138,0.000065968474,0.00041423584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037920257,0.00007810601,0.00010117786,0.0004096867,0.0009011023,0.0001873732,0.00020357751,0.00026879823,0.00008856183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044950494,0.00060278154,0.002201777,0.0010900702,0.0003680639,0.0000053986246,0.0390339,0.000040708153,0.030205745,0.58157414,0.33604383,0.008384077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016754892,0.00007288514,0.007694613,0.00020586255,0.00022065958,0.0000012619676,0.0025083136,0.0000059339204,0.008759325,0.0005255409,0.9796772,0.00016087104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088306324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004955811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64363337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029669567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029463024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5528565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522329692","doi":"","title":"Coping with Complex Causation Information in Personal Injury Cases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Tort; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Psychology; Personal injury; Blame; Law; Computer security; Social psychology; Liability; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.018795515399108956,"score_gpt":0.291024032343544,"score_spread":0.27222851694443506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522329692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980999,0.00007113192,0.003527372,0.008854021,0.00003153952,0.00028030187,0.0000024191122,0.000026031259,0.0062081944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889165,0.0002988792,0.00008675155,0.00028103756,0.00012458944,0.000019342973,0.0000066003377,0.0000034877296,0.00028768912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874586,0.00005360707,0.00015740372,0.00005501606,0.00022360048,0.0007645136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966955,0.00003284326,0.0001019705,0.00004035406,0.00010215709,0.000053101496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005981451,0.000054949076,0.00006354359,0.00007604005,0.0004414266,0.00015346511,0.00010379162,0.00003464348,0.00017887341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039646286,0.000046104793,0.000020617736,0.00020108119,0.00005968663,0.0010431919,0.000009992086,0.0004968373,0.000078203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036108733,0.0000622409,0.01673756,0.000007040775,0.000035597357,0.0000010740748,0.015532983,0.00011095593,0.00020623617,0.9017256,0.0010783981,0.06446624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028191656,0.0010453165,0.11527836,0.00010898279,0.000054449847,0.00044757742,0.18847993,0.0030613325,0.00007122806,0.18460478,0.5029035,0.0011253549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008236587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02060133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71712077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008140685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00143331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523157275","doi":"","title":"The Price of Excessive Damage Awards","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Tort; Sympathy; Variety (cybernetics); Rationality; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Law; Unjust enrichment; Economics; Business; Political science; Liability; Psychology; Restitution; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01614943173311302,"score_gpt":0.28661698333289093,"score_spread":0.2704675515997779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523157275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21294612,0.00027427153,0.000531339,0.013945609,0.000034787132,0.00013614132,0.000008045116,0.000023839011,0.77209985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981332,0.00045817572,0.0009927385,0.00001429134,0.000051076167,1.4315407e-7,5.938048e-7,0.0000020138225,0.01714894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952614,0.000046615558,0.00004424377,0.000079005185,0.00018204044,0.00012194197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994923,0.00007550223,0.00011488247,0.0001664606,0.00009663881,0.00005424415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022301599,0.000036241297,0.00007270713,0.000005943294,0.0005725678,0.000008895528,0.0003894055,0.00003758388,0.0024347203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024040242,0.000034868888,0.00005229823,0.000057076275,0.00032073454,0.0002807716,0.000077577715,0.00004034315,0.00001557939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004851516,0.00015458572,0.001338426,0.00001762331,0.000067077046,0.0000015673918,0.19157495,0.000067594265,0.0013210211,0.666543,0.0069198543,0.13194577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022789056,0.00002469748,0.14757104,0.000008972739,0.000022773489,9.134099e-8,0.10836051,0.00016835936,0.00009815127,0.00015013316,0.7432805,0.000086877524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20811424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31301466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7683859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013033456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011032211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526196003","doi":"","title":"Commencing Proceedings Just After the Limitation Period","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Statute; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Political science; Plaintiff; Statute of limitations; Power (physics); Supreme court","score_opus":0.016847617782860865,"score_gpt":0.296142945841202,"score_spread":0.2792953280583411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526196003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8225625,0.0009697269,0.0011973742,0.14038453,0.0000693449,0.00026094992,7.1646406e-7,0.000053508636,0.034501303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959028,0.0008073422,0.00005104727,0.0008150856,0.0005386547,0.000009944332,4.309322e-7,0.0000045129036,0.0018701835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985632,0.000029707993,0.00012613469,0.000085718355,0.00023083869,0.0009644321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996967,0.000021021742,0.00007974451,0.000050738596,0.00009830643,0.000053518692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014757322,0.000059005073,0.000054655717,0.000025624215,0.0011718604,0.00021771123,0.00024270825,0.000037873193,0.000021894619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059731938,0.000041176372,0.000055313958,0.0001863548,0.00005990796,0.00026018164,0.000010380715,0.0007914022,0.000034631816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106088955,0.00002387023,0.0006168608,5.6184234e-7,0.000009140355,2.6082458e-7,0.012850475,0.000002517629,0.000110940804,0.97226715,0.0003725817,0.013735005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035359434,0.00021232222,0.012825415,0.000021197344,0.000052982643,0.00009700338,0.13665159,0.000092283895,0.000025862697,0.55755836,0.29187006,0.00023934862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008011097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015941726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41470885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005382804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080701476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9013122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527306418","doi":"","title":"The Test for Causation in Canada: But for, but ... Maybe Not","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Test (biology); Confusion; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04677605707819044,"score_gpt":0.2875057320167952,"score_spread":0.24072967493860475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527306418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659694,0.00031687855,0.0042559663,0.023628812,0.00059767126,0.00083035766,0.00019084824,0.000019277839,0.0041907867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953438,0.0008752523,0.00040998863,0.0005972147,0.00050116965,0.00007365379,0.0000028474592,0.000008881375,0.002187187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897933,0.00003910363,0.00024732755,0.00010019542,0.0003123752,0.00032167367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982621,0.0011262802,0.00013299154,0.000095663636,0.0002747255,0.00010825689],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007934698,0.00006592365,0.000088682275,0.000023645858,0.002329548,0.00008952494,0.00021032998,0.000040308532,0.000010275842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005407425,0.000050927956,0.00005756101,0.00011097956,0.000092251124,0.00009685555,0.000006555628,0.00015136698,0.0000037235152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052925444,0.00041849667,0.060843904,0.000044962235,0.00014332158,0.00014101223,0.05701002,0.0010533882,0.0031521975,0.3988209,0.43587065,0.041971866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005520398,0.00002707996,0.014909433,0.000008670732,0.000011721229,0.000058173126,0.005060554,0.0005593695,0.000097827535,0.0059167286,0.972666,0.00013238429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5222145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9253759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5367954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005670815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030359065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529479054","doi":"","title":"Contracting Spousal Support: Thinking through Miglin","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Trilogy; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Task (project management); Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0190914880288153,"score_gpt":0.3161946277345866,"score_spread":0.2971031397057713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529479054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27214488,0.0029068876,0.04521461,0.016004588,0.0009471037,0.0005095397,0.0000043082,0.00022111236,0.66204697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99179703,0.0018293445,0.0005930863,0.0003491719,0.0005470456,0.0000043890113,0.0000010156396,0.000014345982,0.0048645535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971236,0.00017637043,0.00023825427,0.00015063384,0.0003606993,0.0019504316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994379,0.000109253844,0.00017511453,0.00010699929,0.000082261635,0.00008842302],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035621768,0.00009329366,0.00011862254,0.000027341013,0.0016004621,0.00018039295,0.0002897753,0.00008065646,0.000255397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002882814,0.000086508364,0.00009809,0.00018828185,0.00008147989,0.00040370433,0.00001430779,0.0014395152,0.00009822505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032772698,0.000031382806,0.00072193186,6.175186e-7,0.000025281965,0.0000024371052,0.0033312163,0.000009432809,0.00007254654,0.99307007,0.00012961564,0.0026022147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023020024,0.000035412475,0.00004762167,0.000004535297,0.000015526646,0.000077231794,0.015762793,0.0000030797682,0.00006970124,0.5644757,0.41917083,0.00010738229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007672743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063133263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7196522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067714485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003672355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1530969327","doi":"10.21991/c90q1k","title":"Invalidity and Retrospectivity under the Irish and Canadian Constitutions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Legislation; Law; Statute; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science","score_opus":0.06189011535806788,"score_gpt":0.28688165926465836,"score_spread":0.22499154390659049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1530969327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050873015,0.0014582903,0.05154592,0.05334912,0.0014830258,0.001742279,0.0011345483,0.00032029607,0.8380935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99646825,0.00027781242,0.00061982276,0.002032306,0.00012954866,0.000096660835,0.000030395347,0.000006328232,0.000338894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980251,0.0001270007,0.0003212119,0.00047165554,0.00032918548,0.00072580087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984937,0.00019196265,0.00011077777,0.00032983941,0.00025823855,0.0006154927],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000708128,0.00023227514,0.00021633344,0.00014882229,0.0074128504,0.00022055986,0.00031845245,0.00020967227,0.00036258908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003571183,0.00019799228,0.000088247696,0.00040468277,0.020469077,0.00070652046,0.00016841434,0.00036882612,0.00008124388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006642858,0.000037622147,0.045001544,0.0000033983167,0.000033331577,0.0000056720555,0.00039407337,0.000013751262,0.000013838318,0.9498583,0.0043853717,0.00024644172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006963786,0.00003106363,0.03730066,0.000052171814,0.000093180126,0.00020390101,0.011330622,0.00012792005,0.000054481985,0.18290517,0.76663685,0.0005675789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12770605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32116416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035088725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036332707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535042618","doi":"","title":"The merits of the civil action for Breach of Statutory Duty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Statutory law; Delict; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Political science; Duty; Common law; Legislation; Private law; Public law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.4921378471574602,"score_gpt":0.3840079217991512,"score_spread":0.10812992535830895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535042618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757781,0.00000877837,0.001083061,0.0015778074,0.00017131168,0.00033600812,0.00008160597,0.000010831632,0.020952502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912308,0.000018227145,0.0006199467,0.000004849241,0.000019866773,3.0364646e-7,0.000001149011,0.0000023085786,0.008102587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952716,0.000039517272,0.00007954132,0.00007853569,0.00016175128,0.000113516966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993925,0.000062831125,0.00018369284,0.00017766333,0.00015305524,0.000030262156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023455256,0.000037694568,0.00007956565,0.000017553375,0.00035141947,0.000003463627,0.00035625775,0.000051137737,0.00018291359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002176874,0.000031404088,0.00009503549,0.00018213577,0.00048754018,0.00011714243,0.000047823694,0.000059469516,0.0000033654999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030481277,0.00051773264,0.012081509,0.0001455034,0.00021257084,8.520845e-7,0.07117521,0.000019897505,0.03681326,0.8210917,0.029180821,0.028456122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008419243,0.00015168871,0.32862058,0.000043432603,0.00015153283,9.858775e-7,0.051599283,0.00003301029,0.010011835,0.007423868,0.6009236,0.00019825164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021453146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023784956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81366783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027815462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009436165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99402845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535503060","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom020009","title":"Contracts and Contracting","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Damages; Breach of contract; Bargaining power; Order (exchange); Frustration of purpose; Law and economics; Business; Privity of contract; Severability; Exclusion clause; Power (physics); Contract management; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.016238110375378523,"score_gpt":0.29188241824506356,"score_spread":0.275644307869685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535503060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029101659,0.0017332897,0.00004185523,0.00040358506,0.00022675596,0.0006010042,0.000039022143,0.00009114533,0.9968342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002178852,0.021245204,0.0011544436,0.00008938381,0.000525868,0.00004679813,0.000018896386,0.00008758202,0.97465295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905646,0.00004585306,0.00017675901,0.00020606615,0.00031663635,0.00019824744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936986,0.00004579885,0.0002344994,0.00019348369,0.000034920067,0.00012145038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004059495,0.000117689655,0.00020533304,0.00008789163,0.000076950615,0.000026697719,0.00019236185,0.00011562748,0.0005116409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055541328,0.00011662224,0.00002773463,0.00010308306,0.00014309403,0.000045555702,0.00009285263,0.00009349171,0.000060825096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002202496,0.000039335588,0.000067682166,0.00005731792,0.000056676647,0.000005249937,0.0006965521,4.8091255e-7,2.9120554e-7,0.06571209,0.90353835,0.029823763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019695667,0.0000069267103,0.00012703662,0.00012857548,0.00006150538,1.2815586e-7,0.0008997782,0.0000013767913,1.6039344e-7,0.00060813926,0.99784404,0.00012538699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027513339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022260132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094305664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032886735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006013856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56021094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535505803","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2757","title":"The Justice in Unjust Enrichment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Economics","score_opus":0.020685090510327457,"score_gpt":0.3160886434278146,"score_spread":0.29540355291748716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535505803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014912714,0.00012581698,0.0008805496,0.012633824,0.00030458072,0.000076634045,7.243664e-7,0.000011486271,0.98447514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996339,0.00031270625,0.00028011808,0.00047763443,0.00072029524,0.0000074920345,2.8914835e-7,0.000004937703,0.0018575072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990174,0.0001801758,0.00017757817,0.000085276384,0.0002641746,0.000275387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999342,0.00027403908,0.000082574894,0.00012393128,0.000052879837,0.00012453926],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014196251,0.000052803505,0.000062910694,0.000013582666,0.0022142127,0.00026578913,0.0003486889,0.000039329847,0.00009394859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013009249,0.00003603234,0.000041135438,0.000114919196,0.000142047,0.00015259672,0.000034281882,0.00026223235,0.000105864325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025041638,0.000023548242,0.00013671457,0.0000013811311,0.0000027993615,9.3896773e-7,0.00063767924,0.00005664041,0.000020499074,0.9942865,0.0006865231,0.0041442667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017251729,0.000014267528,0.00080770603,0.000009254896,0.0000173972,0.000005140983,0.0016316414,0.00012652135,0.000012394886,0.11642401,0.88071233,0.00006682024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020008992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31345078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095136245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057195117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535992387","doi":"","title":"Romalpa Agreements Post-PPSA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Personal property; Property (philosophy); Business; Realisation; Uniform Commercial Code; Law; Law and economics; Point (geometry); Civil code; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.036864900978598875,"score_gpt":0.2709809771840304,"score_spread":0.23411607620543154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535992387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25482738,0.00005112414,0.00020844144,0.0010813778,0.00004526934,0.000104525796,0.000008241673,0.000036382193,0.74363726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98117805,0.000088100925,0.0023974283,0.000032989967,0.000024290368,1.347021e-7,0.0000021891922,0.000002713274,0.016274095],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951744,0.000033475255,0.000035966692,0.00011246851,0.00015312704,0.00014752916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995929,0.000011099963,0.00006333704,0.00015265128,0.000085288295,0.00009475008],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011293847,0.000044749602,0.00007430653,0.000010184858,0.0003573623,0.0000058420446,0.00031394677,0.00004737771,0.03365786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010073171,0.000056224697,0.00005523527,0.00004155036,0.00015468679,0.00035476958,0.00008033031,0.000033891134,0.00012143096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008056494,0.00036634755,0.008976104,0.000017351447,0.00009533232,0.00001286175,0.49560305,9.79528e-7,0.0016062292,0.42566323,0.0033339404,0.06424401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031961355,0.00007483036,0.7604722,0.000009151004,0.000035983172,2.1549343e-7,0.13834284,0.000016025133,0.000056449924,0.00025576912,0.10026432,0.0001526103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7182807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42973542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7514961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011637351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006643426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9672255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536910408","doi":"","title":"Unfamiliar Waters: Negligent Advocates, Egregious Errors and Lost Chances of Acquittal","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Misrepresentation; Causation; Conviction; Law; Damages; Political science; Law and economics; Excuse; Criminology; Duty; Collusion; Criminal law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.011854398407600776,"score_gpt":0.28485799224114416,"score_spread":0.2730035938335434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536910408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.974071,0.0062122876,0.0007251288,0.011900156,0.0000963284,0.0001855007,0.000003933632,0.000024687957,0.0067809667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797031,0.017293304,0.00010325872,0.00009750774,0.00049025065,0.0000037286227,0.0000011637181,0.000008897962,0.0022987805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814034,0.00006096588,0.00022048345,0.00014438233,0.00026282194,0.0011710044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995483,0.000027851134,0.00014251324,0.000097759774,0.0000701547,0.00011341173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093573955,0.00009361853,0.00013198794,0.000054058768,0.00041580142,0.00004427753,0.00025930163,0.00006080522,0.00003170715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025596839,0.00007770804,0.00006470146,0.0001402428,0.0002260634,0.00022489298,0.000036251062,0.00045562888,0.000029455672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031687137,0.0001412486,0.0034627158,0.000008402074,0.00011766034,0.0000013636799,0.010363794,0.00009627676,0.00085132837,0.89520276,0.00022193565,0.0895008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016049132,0.0006830752,0.0038822072,0.00008870335,0.0001727196,0.00019076698,0.09780751,0.0003335037,0.002910228,0.24127622,0.6502707,0.00077944814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011524407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009615227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65392655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004061943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010877745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53655225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538231396","doi":"","title":"From testamentary freedom to testamentary duty: Finding the balance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queensland University of Technology","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Bequest; Probate; Legislation; Settlor; Law; Paternalism; Duty; Balance (ability); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.021110256498124265,"score_gpt":0.24935193738844885,"score_spread":0.2282416808903246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538231396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583173,0.00003334157,0.00061330857,0.02999685,0.000064623724,0.00028578826,0.00008118583,0.00014589979,0.010461695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926911,0.0001811761,0.005548084,0.00016632257,0.000060961003,0.0000013629311,0.0000071513073,0.0000053457497,0.0013384791],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991727,0.000034109038,0.00010626159,0.00026165327,0.00018955374,0.00023573896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928695,0.00010039498,0.000085927364,0.0003923908,0.00005634416,0.00007798989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013990515,0.000089789944,0.00014616153,0.000113535265,0.000927362,0.00000920738,0.00079861516,0.000119056705,0.00032869334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056578767,0.0000845074,0.000055877314,0.00047302913,0.00071333547,0.00009449003,0.0003211998,0.00020701422,0.0001421945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055657354,0.0002551648,0.90105003,0.0000067556134,0.00012902392,0.00009845572,0.015318325,0.00007339961,0.0032526937,0.036123652,0.031032095,0.0126047265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050605886,0.000045346784,0.2215254,0.000042167845,0.000037195703,0.00000324511,0.019160667,0.00004797865,0.0007505699,0.005427578,0.75222,0.0002338329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027386623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003078846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7211879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119057695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009494534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539543202","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Ownership and the Relativity of Title","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Reductionism; Theory of relativity; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theoretical physics; Physics","score_opus":0.026187585977406502,"score_gpt":0.27619567259279454,"score_spread":0.25000808661538804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539543202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09292853,0.0064907763,0.0014908983,0.0068215956,0.00011496194,0.0001972912,0.0000021172184,0.000008924309,0.8919449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948572,0.0010202593,0.000010513064,0.000007375976,0.000035346762,6.082594e-7,2.6141912e-8,0.0000010871586,0.004067582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962646,0.000061944134,0.00005508977,0.000019136261,0.000062788495,0.0001745841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997858,0.00007772961,0.00006337057,0.000041239546,0.00002191428,0.000009992889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011042783,0.000013859152,0.000030318224,0.0000036749102,0.00018337507,0.0000047906015,0.00009599522,0.000012571661,0.000035336478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050090828,0.0000065135814,0.000021021537,0.000037302183,0.0003206796,0.000020739031,0.0000085428155,0.00019664431,0.0000036641243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040263353,0.000002906872,0.00014540486,1.344667e-7,0.000007544659,6.99625e-9,0.0017482251,5.634669e-8,0.000004064343,0.9929701,0.000054697342,0.005062818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017342232,0.000022007956,0.00081195537,0.000002423051,0.000012249409,0.0000022099348,0.0056894356,0.000005493663,0.000103448765,0.9210463,0.072109744,0.00002129228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004144325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010620441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90192866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022407441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029143237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14103913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541056688","doi":"10.4324/9780203024393","title":"British System of Government","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013848788214565491,"score_gpt":0.24756899966843388,"score_spread":0.2337202114538684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541056688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026695168,0.000088764384,0.00008601441,0.00016592686,0.00007847071,0.0002999933,0.000058586313,0.000040830073,0.99915475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009064031,0.00008216525,0.00014267693,0.00003094689,0.00024683285,0.000028454686,0.0000052344517,0.000007812459,0.99039185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991697,0.000013852734,0.00015604697,0.00011139337,0.0004484631,0.00010056546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996173,0.00003081719,0.00011632671,0.00013412036,0.000043409877,0.00005805649],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012388367,0.000049726084,0.00013131247,0.0000043205227,0.00008191325,0.000050688013,0.00021661428,0.00012477809,0.0033250628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007874193,0.000054194996,0.00006523188,0.000021688802,0.00009579087,0.00003538382,0.000047699916,0.000065461696,0.0002577506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.235635e-8,0.000004715818,0.0000036153976,0.000029967405,0.000006357748,3.1157236e-7,0.0000926162,1.1343363e-7,8.1047074e-7,0.698054,0.30003726,0.0017701351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023701641,0.0000033803883,0.00003268728,0.00008273076,0.0000100649995,2.9884043e-7,0.00053576054,0.000003155747,0.0000027238784,0.0009709335,0.99827075,0.0000638336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016965738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058499887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6982334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038557648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001978067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541220344","doi":"","title":"Common Law and Equity in R3RUE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Equity (law); Common law; Restitution; Impossibility; Law and economics; Political science; Constructive; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10784921213275266,"score_gpt":0.38684703310390206,"score_spread":0.2789978209711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541220344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016955834,0.058932148,0.0000059143968,0.005669685,0.0000444403,0.0004970701,0.000007933985,0.000047291807,0.9178397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293425,0.063583866,0.00017734717,0.0065710717,0.0000364722,0.000021743168,0.0000017509386,0.000004810592,0.0002604581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936825,0.000097285156,0.0001524615,0.00013954,0.00009168366,0.00015080831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997012,0.00003440843,0.00004207066,0.0001187454,0.000012847329,0.000090716276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007807181,0.00006001767,0.00016818749,0.0000065931044,0.00025495247,0.00003804683,0.00012729886,0.000041295687,0.000103657745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013663724,0.00005021266,0.000023386912,0.00009299549,0.00019606814,0.00015860122,0.00009990044,0.00011085796,0.000016519158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.0551434e-7,0.000017513543,0.000358563,0.00017645682,0.0000013323539,8.148043e-7,0.0009233906,5.0646833e-9,0.000004274804,0.9823641,0.00015577368,0.015997134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006667198,0.000008710268,0.0007237903,0.0004261846,0.000011011772,7.343646e-7,0.000066355424,0.0000015218143,0.00001129232,0.0138886,0.984719,0.000076120996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031851858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06265808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98456323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002211605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015142421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9745951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541760580","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2756","title":"Consideration Which Happens to Fail","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Expansive; Unjust enrichment; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Database transaction; Business; Order (exchange); Political science; Economics; Computer science; History; Finance","score_opus":0.02449982162249849,"score_gpt":0.3135928926971125,"score_spread":0.289093071074614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541760580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067037703,0.000013973789,0.012590427,0.029168058,0.00020096848,0.00012173368,0.0000025941845,0.000042093423,0.9511564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428964,0.000015506013,0.0021151537,0.0015076373,0.00081601914,0.0000071850286,0.000001453162,0.000008417357,0.0012389901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897504,0.00014246142,0.00018886186,0.00012931487,0.00030443902,0.00025987413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991863,0.00008240907,0.00007888891,0.00013051869,0.00022795277,0.0002939383],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088365644,0.00006834787,0.00009617417,0.000025872809,0.0018369991,0.00045093175,0.00019985402,0.000060976618,0.0004143316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021010311,0.00006298374,0.000044014083,0.00014203566,0.000062895415,0.00023372745,0.00003221315,0.00019987722,0.0004907601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022708548,0.0000117395075,0.0001237656,8.416622e-7,0.0000047306394,0.0000010335352,0.0017512366,0.000121513396,0.00025080226,0.9935799,0.002962864,0.0011892719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001835863,0.00003617361,0.00036977138,0.000014466712,0.000010580699,0.000020558096,0.0010972298,0.00014890132,0.00022895263,0.1302085,0.86754763,0.00013366301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021209607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49162343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98758584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063779415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097382384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541803598","doi":"10.1108/17561450911001243","title":"Legal incoherence and the extra‐constitutional law of regulatory takings","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Law; Jurisprudence; Common law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Political science; Private law; Property law; Public law; Economics; Sociology; Property rights","score_opus":0.022114634204567184,"score_gpt":0.3012256096318854,"score_spread":0.2791109754273182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541803598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61715925,0.0013252688,0.0023599744,0.08822201,0.0004950031,0.00057349855,0.000025328969,0.0000076006977,0.2898321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798775,0.00019908194,0.00041976117,0.0011170015,0.00019988215,0.0000046909713,4.7806355e-7,0.0000013252463,0.000070033166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876934,0.00012115696,0.00030850017,0.00006599232,0.0006541032,0.00008092383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993962,0.00018438979,0.0002586711,0.00009493396,0.000036884052,0.000028894458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012312148,0.00005264263,0.00009173442,0.000021193264,0.00014448003,0.000054911063,0.00060337334,0.000029700888,0.000058514528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035841975,0.000031387324,0.00006268499,0.000029802253,0.0018214738,0.0001972514,0.000039415412,0.00015626132,0.0000025756258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003793101,0.00007108483,0.0001759902,4.3283782e-7,0.0000147411165,0.000006043903,0.0015793481,0.00033536064,0.0002376727,0.9961834,0.000036551883,0.0013214655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011984084,0.000051958632,0.01888913,0.000051704603,0.000023602352,0.00008621058,0.00069000514,0.000054056305,0.00033374896,0.15896976,0.8195631,0.00008830319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011331594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018920848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83721364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008411043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051618394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6711296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542585521","doi":"","title":"Simplifying Canadian Negligence Actions Against Public Authorities – Or Maybe Not","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Duty; Duty of care; Plaintiff; Res ipsa loquitur; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Action (physics); Business; Law and economics; Tort; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.09565155933432401,"score_gpt":0.3556480425580969,"score_spread":0.2599964832237729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542585521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54204243,0.0041178395,0.011945998,0.12714784,0.002483639,0.0008939772,0.000068449786,0.00035712286,0.3109427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985821,0.0032815884,0.000100406265,0.0005369867,0.0014263985,0.00001807357,0.0000029957644,0.000014977076,0.008797567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584216,0.00011227227,0.00019987545,0.0001226608,0.00029452477,0.003428529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989276,0.000073199284,0.00009585384,0.00013968731,0.000110407804,0.00065324723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019166427,0.00010471872,0.00010329137,0.00014225293,0.0032751395,0.00028723996,0.0004064721,0.000098888275,0.0002059214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022613436,0.00009260849,0.00007991595,0.00042675764,0.00011767973,0.0008548774,0.0000265763,0.0011931045,0.00012691856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026016473,0.000021271184,0.0010699647,0.000001096771,0.000025964544,5.940178e-7,0.002561181,0.000004410209,0.0000614382,0.9755889,0.00026346976,0.02039906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010771742,0.000025214023,0.0011194919,0.000007846276,0.000017567607,0.000045327834,0.052703958,0.000016063212,0.000028000424,0.027176937,0.91853654,0.00021533239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076560885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70052445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.948412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026600498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011517253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542624731","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199559152.003.0002","title":"Criminal Law as Public Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Political science; Morality; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Public law; Private law; Analogy; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12046767205899205,"score_gpt":0.32344929868005623,"score_spread":0.20298162662106417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542624731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000035505914,0.00006781161,0.00004638684,0.0031112654,0.00012270019,0.00020124672,0.000013770312,0.0001425027,0.99629074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05769918,0.00010220766,0.00018007522,0.0027718646,0.00050229253,0.000015671694,0.000015123594,0.000022902326,0.93869066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899787,0.000012794817,0.00016837323,0.00026227653,0.00030749087,0.00025118463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992577,0.00003524233,0.00008558321,0.00029567434,0.00011908764,0.00020674385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001971701,0.00014361569,0.00015134263,0.000026166847,0.00067948655,0.00017156416,0.00044009453,0.00028440406,0.02244167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008677802,0.00012979002,0.00012432745,0.000018100183,0.0006497427,0.00016721534,0.00010189914,0.0002301355,0.005739382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.7039937e-7,0.000010123716,3.6865626e-7,0.0000035650316,0.000011329521,0.0000018950922,0.000636559,5.2039386e-9,6.1415795e-7,0.9946207,0.0035762973,0.0011378088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001989637,0.0000080531,7.616295e-7,0.000004742256,0.00001785209,5.290053e-7,0.00007771886,6.6056955e-8,0.0000035493656,0.37453982,0.62521297,0.00011400859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03521474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059226222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6216367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064493295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019975238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99503475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542754321","doi":"","title":"The Relationship between Rights and Remedies in Private Law: A Comparison between the Common and the Civil Law Tradition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Commonwealth; Private law; Political science; Common law; Comparative law; Public law; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.030963246201774097,"score_gpt":0.3146259206271506,"score_spread":0.2836626744253765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542754321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521801,0.0007890107,0.00011500829,0.03902141,0.000050661085,0.000297475,0.0000031695874,0.000014090062,0.0075290636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894863,0.00030062383,0.000010800425,0.000066810324,0.00051875174,0.000015662878,0.0000023970315,0.00000529701,0.00013099377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983592,0.00041293804,0.00025985506,0.00010393143,0.00023519002,0.0006288684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751484,0.002103114,0.00015735494,0.00014329,0.00002617641,0.000055242428],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051045273,0.000078995254,0.00013299052,0.000017621542,0.0042947405,0.00027702271,0.0003259581,0.00007262326,0.0000016056433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010209837,0.000037829934,0.000037313166,0.00013855376,0.0012922499,0.0001817876,0.000036454912,0.002215723,0.0000023920823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006820426,0.0000049481105,0.0844396,5.896437e-7,0.0000150134665,4.9838206e-8,0.0024604758,4.1888507e-7,0.0000026637285,0.91216904,0.00002345149,0.00087690906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003382573,0.000018170547,0.13757314,0.0000063812586,0.000028579923,0.0000040098803,0.0013907586,0.000013805859,0.0000047508183,0.8221584,0.038413618,0.000050158553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00630089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44072878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43442792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010278606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018965294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542978675","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.006","title":"Trust laws in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.029372169859132588,"score_gpt":0.23963484283630657,"score_spread":0.210262672977174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542978675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032534573,0.00013777189,0.000034966924,0.00011148661,0.000116646144,0.00038046436,0.00013056738,0.00008412788,0.9986786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02186109,0.0002506473,0.000037661946,0.00003797878,0.00028713542,0.0000010845745,0.000019292076,0.000020336349,0.97748476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990207,0.00004123523,0.00012378849,0.00027061472,0.00022778452,0.0003158725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929875,0.000034329652,0.000120392695,0.00031036697,0.000045334888,0.00019082737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018322901,0.0001743813,0.0002183225,0.00010165624,0.00036523154,0.000040268664,0.0004943125,0.00032342388,0.00003393469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075151347,0.00021456223,0.0001225193,0.000011902321,0.00032911755,0.00011425505,0.00020590489,0.0003984006,0.000055833505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000846204,0.000009619325,0.00002112606,0.000010926169,0.000013776527,0.00001869327,0.00057205185,5.519299e-7,0.000003333842,0.99069893,0.006815407,0.0018271012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001786894,0.0000051040083,0.00026114171,0.000035708395,0.000042771335,5.8217285e-7,0.00011804216,0.000003798636,0.000008680798,0.000052354117,0.99905324,0.00023989056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058984347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034940336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031172278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015735463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8916708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547571473","doi":"","title":"Priorities Under the Land Registration Act 2002","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Meaning (existential); Land registration; Value (mathematics); Disposition; Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Geography; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Advertising; Philosophy; Social psychology; Epistemology; Statistics; Land tenure; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04075124593908199,"score_gpt":0.3323009036715741,"score_spread":0.29154965773249214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547571473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027934646,0.000041707357,0.00081582466,0.076406255,0.00002845005,0.00010950062,7.898645e-7,0.00005346431,0.8946094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552702,0.00004504032,0.00011055149,0.0010498699,0.00017748693,0.000002748717,5.597513e-7,8.975999e-7,0.043342665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968857,0.000021147061,0.000048942424,0.000051659805,0.00010869403,0.000080969396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982154,0.000033102326,0.00001761285,0.00008558825,0.000020035426,0.000022127033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016098592,0.000023154238,0.000022940894,0.000004797626,0.00042111403,0.00009581562,0.00009754163,0.000021818005,0.00029345605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012389492,0.00001425127,0.000015985717,0.000070895294,0.00005860901,0.000089308975,0.000004023403,0.000037122994,0.000067076864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.2458785e-7,0.0000073665665,0.00023830298,1.7751276e-7,9.0089094e-7,5.3223857e-8,0.00071449805,0.0000070719925,0.000024655972,0.987717,0.009133017,0.002156488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049275834,0.000010960041,0.05570069,0.0000014546607,0.0000035834698,2.4279313e-7,0.0025960796,0.000033506003,0.00004351826,0.03219489,0.9093138,0.0000520236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001528391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033680864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95552206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001635397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005278061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32389113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547665210","doi":"","title":"Probate Actions and 'Suspicious Circumstances': A Third Standard of Proof for Allegations Involving Moral Guilt","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Testamentary trust; Supreme court; Probate; Context (archaeology); Law; Reasonable doubt; Balance (ability); Standard of review; Third party; Securities fraud; Hearsay; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.03587586103344151,"score_gpt":0.30853827330212513,"score_spread":0.2726624122686836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547665210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54428804,0.0012584697,0.034483217,0.04107287,0.0007741888,0.0065402365,0.00059695484,0.0005871706,0.37039882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903593,0.000049652313,0.0074142073,0.00022327404,0.0002726095,0.00028404195,0.000010455114,0.0000143970265,0.0013720731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988439,0.00007789378,0.0002761134,0.00025509586,0.0002619798,0.0002850255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890155,0.00015936252,0.00015837343,0.00034735983,0.00025987366,0.00017349725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000626699,0.00010413596,0.0002005046,0.00003823045,0.0009961973,0.00013266726,0.00030894455,0.00008679263,0.00004270327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005059865,0.0001022496,0.00007082476,0.00021230045,0.00031806374,0.0003565431,0.000072763,0.00013665279,0.0000076137067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014552136,0.000035444755,0.0010158456,0.000037416354,0.000016049753,1.0262831e-7,0.0014135446,0.00005558697,0.0006495623,0.9943903,0.0017163677,0.0006552204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007030869,0.0001536702,0.0011027006,0.00006633097,0.000050371018,7.9064444e-7,0.0017618285,0.00040704868,0.0012111004,0.20281649,0.7914767,0.00024984585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021610945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034802385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080871265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023124919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98280996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550663498","doi":"10.71781/2135","title":"La propriété des créances : approche comparative","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07183418639319442,"score_gpt":0.38164742424857095,"score_spread":0.3098132378553765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550663498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22277226,0.001107519,0.0013575961,0.00071455917,0.00021958265,0.00066647265,0.000016540787,0.000090215624,0.77305526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8663821,0.000414357,0.0051088664,0.00006667965,0.00024956293,0.0002463092,0.0001314909,0.000015675429,0.12738496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827343,0.00018418497,0.0003403485,0.00043487022,0.00039621638,0.00037094558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989996,0.0001749952,0.00023645895,0.00016790481,0.0002558769,0.00016519711],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032636244,0.00028167723,0.0003421587,0.00004463728,0.0011985446,0.00018530648,0.00044912542,0.00039013036,0.0008075021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003811828,0.00024069834,0.0001599852,0.0006075786,0.001170113,0.00029045073,0.000031501306,0.0004169248,0.0008681283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011151961,0.00022523987,0.00016576034,0.00013690304,0.000049097936,0.0000011947145,0.14626348,0.00010552678,0.00017065153,0.84067625,0.00023837219,0.011956344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003963094,0.00008973271,0.0062714256,0.00037716524,0.00014727139,0.0000023493963,0.29661968,0.0001859568,0.002976862,0.08860062,0.6035728,0.00075979915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011077607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030109167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7520757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027348648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008415597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551625796","doi":"10.53300/001c.5583","title":"The Solicitor-General in context: A tri-jurisdictional study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04241980432290191,"score_gpt":0.3749907213378239,"score_spread":0.332570917014922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551625796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1259459,0.3157592,0.000020326665,0.0401957,0.0009926751,0.0053349067,0.000025797714,0.00012949543,0.51159596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849313,0.009727566,0.000018677607,0.0019466209,0.00060113356,0.00028361657,0.0000016155152,0.0000050406898,0.0024844192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907136,0.00018236549,0.00021293495,0.00008758569,0.00021038241,0.00023537822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995718,0.00010176159,0.000056074285,0.0001576764,0.000030265712,0.00008240044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014426347,0.000056603807,0.00012683633,0.000006335911,0.00057990785,0.00004051951,0.00018617598,0.000022643526,0.0000810136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046869485,0.0000366568,0.000058046076,0.00019128925,0.00009958633,0.00011912815,0.000032682576,0.000094443574,0.0001188343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.175944e-7,0.00011344584,0.0017748073,0.000012115581,0.000004808533,1.645342e-7,0.0009972122,6.382699e-8,0.0000011289245,0.98510295,0.0047290716,0.0072633126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000930607,0.0000075474727,0.0040853084,0.00005364235,0.000013169179,3.362916e-7,0.00032852354,7.318068e-7,8.5887984e-7,0.00048271875,0.9948839,0.000050194914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005709456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016759953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99015486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005161875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060786406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9352447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552143593","doi":"","title":"Recipe for a New Tort: Recognizing a Common Law Right to Privacy in Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Tort; Political science; Common law; High Court; Denial; Jurisprudence; Law of the case; Precedent; Majority opinion; Supreme court; Court of record; Original jurisdiction; Psychology","score_opus":0.05732386506477993,"score_gpt":0.31160896901036766,"score_spread":0.25428510394558773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552143593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7913872,0.00037737226,0.009213661,0.009579949,0.00036393414,0.0012244685,0.0000028506204,0.00006468522,0.18778585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841033,0.000118020165,0.0022240442,0.00035644742,0.00031993934,0.000029905033,0.0000013477604,0.000012835373,0.012834164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979502,0.000053369113,0.00024750657,0.00016441071,0.0001580957,0.0014264457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949646,0.000044804357,0.00009172256,0.0001271513,0.000051175095,0.00018868069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015010622,0.00008583121,0.0001366675,0.00007638684,0.0005054215,0.00007045325,0.00039812876,0.00006799308,0.00016295361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042776748,0.000080045975,0.00008077705,0.00022998707,0.000031637184,0.00022884832,0.000037090016,0.000857837,0.000036802798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004489781,0.000055243036,0.0030049952,6.8848436e-7,0.000017217808,8.976642e-7,0.016258806,0.0000011129548,0.00003766526,0.9690333,0.00026753804,0.011277642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030429935,0.0001228169,0.0011145521,0.000016164158,0.000010319495,0.000007827407,0.0012414933,0.000001689848,0.00006498531,0.5456684,0.45133898,0.00010848293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38764367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6000529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021084857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004359906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7734286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552228707","doi":"","title":"The Priority Pitfall Problem: The Contest Between Judgment and Secured Creditors in Ontario","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Creditor; Writ; Security interest; Enforcement; Statute; Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.011265111222375437,"score_gpt":0.26778094913891715,"score_spread":0.2565158379165417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552228707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691441,0.00028131722,0.00007466046,0.023504071,0.00032332257,0.00037944745,0.0000013077687,0.00001382428,0.006277922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99600947,0.0004871286,0.000025653526,0.00004099152,0.0010348845,0.000017101245,6.3185644e-7,0.0000054585544,0.0023787036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982452,0.000103814426,0.00019853676,0.00011807433,0.00026871826,0.0010657012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941766,0.00020117595,0.00011184909,0.00013051342,0.00005665095,0.000082126346],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037593967,0.000076579745,0.00008618966,0.000017742208,0.0015384551,0.00022561508,0.00041298536,0.00006857185,0.000010962363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077562436,0.000043511023,0.000040591036,0.00010623784,0.00024200461,0.00011985587,0.000049111495,0.0028899629,0.0000050967583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006347057,0.00002574701,0.11114995,5.3191513e-7,0.000026721018,2.9202965e-7,0.0076189605,9.553182e-7,0.00007192919,0.87513506,0.00018543823,0.0057780445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028378644,0.000054584536,0.09563473,0.000004606117,0.000016959479,0.000007786339,0.0052609425,0.0000025733293,0.0000057235793,0.3456364,0.5530026,0.00008933726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10995898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9794534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86949444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006244064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035120177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554224463","doi":"","title":"Conceiving of Tradition: Dynamics of Judicial Interpretation and Explanation in Native Title Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Discretion; Judicial discretion; Meaning (existential); Law; Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial interpretation; Common law; Judicial review; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14970468934952952,"score_gpt":0.4228201202410188,"score_spread":0.27311543089148926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554224463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05256639,0.0000030719445,0.0000812224,0.004793994,0.000011758542,0.00021690088,0.00006666219,0.0000032217467,0.9422568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99431396,0.000014401049,0.00022266721,0.000010815713,0.000021596605,7.9852026e-7,0.00002031468,0.0000011267059,0.0053942977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995098,0.00008052313,0.00006386934,0.000064868,0.00022491996,0.00005602913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995966,0.00010759415,0.000033179353,0.000023903482,0.00021536538,0.000023389995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043351037,0.000018260505,0.00004125532,0.00011060361,0.000092569404,0.000017701575,0.00014308695,0.000027750018,0.0001853494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005088627,0.000021925582,0.000008943659,0.0003303686,0.00021468254,0.00032243927,0.00003200299,0.00006742346,0.0000062343693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008190242,0.00002098175,0.00013449164,0.0000025487764,0.000003080791,3.6208186e-7,0.0010153411,0.000020329147,0.000028732315,0.99721617,0.00063307787,0.0009166948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019122551,0.00017687287,0.027452854,0.00025006157,0.000016777176,0.0000012198356,0.038891472,0.0068749385,0.0020643347,0.18888806,0.7331278,0.00034338754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031612257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076849204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017301338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015232313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47788486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554323398","doi":"","title":"Accountability of Public Authorities Through Contextualized Determinations of Vicarious Liability and Non-Delegable Duties","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Accountability; Work (physics); Liability; Government (linguistics); Business; Public relations; Political science; Accounting; Tort; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.05800453511599765,"score_gpt":0.34722417742045925,"score_spread":0.2892196423044616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554323398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604335,0.0002250474,0.0006062876,0.00030265702,0.000062456114,0.00024692927,0.0000082953275,0.000022019101,0.038092807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654216,0.00017452786,0.00066937174,0.0000013519738,0.000056768775,8.302702e-7,0.0000025671268,0.000004344569,0.0025480934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982584,0.00044120694,0.00021605335,0.00023692548,0.00055395986,0.00029343055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730873,0.0011198304,0.00016960475,0.00020302345,0.0010586178,0.00014020107],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034910613,0.00007137963,0.00023967867,0.00011208698,0.001502741,0.00005328484,0.00024998942,0.0001350144,0.000053855896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061405945,0.00008324862,0.000054244087,0.0004196387,0.0023241476,0.00046457505,0.00017825101,0.00036248146,7.7237803e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003780042,0.00072749855,0.53864336,0.0006808558,0.0001589053,0.000009899842,0.26952,0.00001178891,0.020099787,0.16228884,0.00026894466,0.0072120717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013550253,0.00073604455,0.36027607,0.00012268314,0.000052192412,0.0000033592235,0.40702835,0.00027026897,0.0023814186,0.0072309263,0.22022721,0.00031644147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026810922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045900806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21995828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010868665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003138592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557657977","doi":"","title":"Waters' law of trusts in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Thomson/Carswell eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.014678238624895767,"score_gpt":0.25045341765565493,"score_spread":0.23577517903075917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557657977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017170691,0.00013509569,0.0000031887394,0.00038947316,0.00017960816,0.0004921761,0.00011010491,0.000031477033,0.9969418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28691852,0.00004178778,0.00008969645,0.00033403662,0.00041243155,0.000028539738,0.000022724982,0.000032958666,0.7121193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805677,0.00009211964,0.00047919774,0.00033860622,0.00056518277,0.00046814658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897707,0.000120173056,0.0002366357,0.00042152035,0.00007505712,0.00016951976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035689754,0.00023604317,0.0004536756,0.000072024544,0.00019024807,0.000031330477,0.0006332833,0.00026449366,0.00021679829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010752857,0.00023896425,0.00011704775,0.000048066533,0.00034455076,0.000044278826,0.00010556971,0.0004217561,0.00004777046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102819195,0.000017390006,0.00007160213,0.00005777906,0.000027460097,0.000017222483,0.0044482104,0.000027356306,0.000021637765,0.97067076,0.015437582,0.009192703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017030654,0.000007980194,0.00005277852,0.00009442366,0.000026161628,5.464923e-7,0.0004159303,0.000006640083,0.0001586073,0.007542889,0.9912647,0.0002590302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95592433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016066863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068975547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559189301","doi":"","title":"Nor-Man Regional Health Authority: Labour Arbitration, Questions of General Law and the Challenge of Legal Centrism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Arbitration; Statutory law; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Standard of review; Estoppel; Statute; Doctrine","score_opus":0.02630105219052449,"score_gpt":0.30147971939604495,"score_spread":0.2751786672055205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559189301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41286135,0.026706629,0.015326731,0.33967662,0.0005412539,0.001766796,0.000077843615,0.00010813568,0.20293467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98858804,0.009690923,0.00025907162,0.00036726843,0.00028376802,0.0000061416495,0.000001452145,0.0000057221214,0.00079762074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984043,0.00026771,0.00030816026,0.00010518619,0.00025682268,0.0006577809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930274,0.000042532803,0.00029442727,0.00011527756,0.00015542074,0.000089600144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024837374,0.00006720261,0.00015626205,0.000033770946,0.00075125066,0.00002356287,0.00021752299,0.00004995625,0.000021868113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003440897,0.000049452727,0.00007245326,0.00013773418,0.00048355537,0.00016232111,0.00002215702,0.00065033446,0.0000012220962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021135453,0.00006270185,0.00011964514,0.0000037119896,0.000031497566,1.2240642e-7,0.004220094,0.0000015197464,0.000010956399,0.9946886,0.00005207449,0.0007879713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006441007,0.00013625664,0.0012829135,0.000014745695,0.000021726224,0.0000200925,0.003517879,0.00002972623,0.000023290608,0.9330732,0.061159823,0.000076193486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03492861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06025211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5757267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017449449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002329784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559970500","doi":"","title":"'Fully Appreciating' the Ontario Court of Appeal’s Views on the Summary Judgment Rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Summary judgment; Political science; High Court; Psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05110731980614478,"score_gpt":0.2785294206404173,"score_spread":0.22742210083427253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559970500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39801812,0.0012751794,0.0011612454,0.020900417,0.0002710668,0.0008645026,0.0000046090536,0.00003454904,0.5774703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877906,0.0010283914,0.000056235076,0.00041957953,0.00028242552,0.000026307702,7.921656e-7,0.000009514224,0.010386163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979904,0.00021136916,0.00026996428,0.00011810989,0.00040172116,0.0010083881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924666,0.000116936826,0.00027325502,0.00023246824,0.000073328,0.000057378365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040267375,0.000094252064,0.00011904394,0.000022978287,0.001061493,0.000045901437,0.0007097267,0.000048713024,0.00024991206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005277881,0.000050233855,0.00013287508,0.00014051278,0.00016129046,0.00007638072,0.000046965637,0.0012514959,0.00004879655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018150735,0.000103018814,0.0014722757,9.77502e-7,0.000060301718,2.0351905e-7,0.015438579,0.000005404179,0.000034031502,0.97409934,0.001828284,0.0069394424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024466627,0.00021579691,0.004498557,0.00003018581,0.0000533652,0.000009319894,0.020449977,0.00001150218,0.00017920161,0.3563077,0.61784446,0.00015527953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029894875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35012484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61779165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000893415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024858937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9765651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560107499","doi":"","title":"Regulatory Takings in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Property rights; Law; Presumption; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Statute; Business; Law and economics; Remuneration; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.019803160174076163,"score_gpt":0.2561516675635832,"score_spread":0.23634850738950705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560107499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6896835,0.000029737603,0.000013355993,0.00057745195,0.00028216155,0.00033113567,0.000019863224,0.000019233821,0.3090436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99322915,0.00000955917,0.00023582944,0.00009783553,0.00012756561,0.0000057973734,0.000022264912,0.0000068817876,0.0062651443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980212,0.00028221976,0.00028617238,0.00041188716,0.0006287036,0.00036984181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991601,0.00014510576,0.00014883622,0.00027490698,0.00012698933,0.00014404295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090652285,0.00013492211,0.00018585609,0.00018435958,0.0014726289,0.00035326884,0.0012617989,0.00012848247,0.000099064695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012623564,0.00017115215,0.000045872766,0.00090433273,0.00028649758,0.0018226521,0.00031156163,0.000500297,0.0000144380665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003558055,0.00009938305,0.3400265,0.000005810097,0.000005237083,0.00022024628,0.00038861256,0.0022577164,0.00022534309,0.656027,0.00049687794,0.00021164933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045195044,0.000004458817,0.40783918,0.00006784497,0.000005472664,0.000004104232,0.0013553115,0.000024898547,0.00010030621,0.000962081,0.58898056,0.00020383921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65506494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057296413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007175642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560729052","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006263","title":"To punish or not punish: a comparative analysis of the legislative treatment of exemplary damages in Commonwealth jurisdictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Commonwealth; Legislature; Legislation; Political science; Law; Intellectual property; Common law; Business","score_opus":0.08846968357664861,"score_gpt":0.4150822134370851,"score_spread":0.32661252986043654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560729052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6762352,0.00005554923,0.00003299002,0.00172686,0.00010035847,0.0017318362,0.00042460294,0.000021635115,0.31967095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94836724,0.0001837612,0.00024965324,0.000061655766,0.000027231245,0.00031350172,0.0002637268,0.0000069103585,0.050526347],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983864,0.0002690478,0.00051541824,0.00026023018,0.00036677645,0.00020211494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984346,0.00036697474,0.00042596157,0.00040037397,0.0002777625,0.000094326046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018572615,0.00017660423,0.00066501705,0.00035180853,0.0003604974,0.000039819202,0.00040523327,0.00014939389,0.00042786237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034698955,0.00011088525,0.00025087481,0.0025039061,0.000164288,0.00011850204,0.000030337285,0.00012805912,0.000009054254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002151022,0.0016950332,0.013799026,0.000045257704,0.0019737405,8.9391074e-7,0.79655606,0.0009919443,0.00045722493,0.17884386,0.0031344695,0.0022873972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004840736,0.00031306208,0.73660237,0.00010593035,0.00161545,7.579369e-8,0.13877055,0.0004899248,0.0020477257,0.00023467344,0.11895267,0.00038350746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14196107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67260593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72280335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022808457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000590035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86375266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561300116","doi":"","title":"The Lamer Legacy for Judicial Independence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Commission; Supreme court; Judicial independence; Judicial review; Judicial discretion; Context (archaeology); Law; Charter; Government (linguistics); Judicial opinion; Independence (probability theory); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01407192240472662,"score_gpt":0.3235943973531767,"score_spread":0.3095224749484501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561300116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19972475,0.010672127,0.1429662,0.4225759,0.0016243906,0.002374936,0.0000105098225,0.00027750584,0.2197737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914629,0.0024463665,0.00004954276,0.0003541575,0.0011744364,0.000009598302,4.3796044e-7,0.0000046475525,0.004497907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801826,0.000053695505,0.00014190565,0.00009590738,0.00027830616,0.0014119305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954474,0.00009806206,0.00009097985,0.00009252402,0.00010812813,0.0000655955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024359291,0.00005682183,0.00006197274,0.000018344579,0.0024158147,0.00025152162,0.0004172232,0.000053117416,0.000009824106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015386278,0.000039957282,0.00008358592,0.00013467403,0.00007376104,0.00024349475,0.000009921924,0.0008000212,0.000019751169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011065772,0.000014020869,0.000034628458,1.02976344e-7,0.000008872969,1.0520038e-7,0.00033691374,0.0000046880473,0.00003656135,0.92886233,0.00038616042,0.07030452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013663562,0.00007271878,0.00024483167,0.0000016741741,0.000008069137,0.000006817509,0.003128435,0.000016001099,0.000011936416,0.64682937,0.3494906,0.00005287966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034465166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009597659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79173815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003853312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026260403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1561659932","doi":"","title":"Describing Dishonest Means: The Implications of Seeing 'Dishonesty' as a Course of Conduct or Mental Element and the Parallels with Indecency","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Dishonesty; Element (criminal law); Supreme court; Law; Parallels; Mental state; Political science; Exposition (narrative); Psychology; Criminal law; Engineering; Literature","score_opus":0.029397730696960882,"score_gpt":0.3203511789294084,"score_spread":0.2909534482324475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1561659932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706763,0.00067729026,0.00079772103,0.02473175,0.000050269944,0.0005724783,0.000008944503,0.000009769168,0.002475494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765676,0.0018285157,0.00009265768,0.00008062152,0.00009190786,0.00003357137,0.0000015070989,0.000008443423,0.0002060212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985898,0.00011872147,0.00027098102,0.0001188605,0.0002590323,0.00064257113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991083,0.00019775919,0.0002914,0.00019831784,0.00013092802,0.000073257535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022616535,0.00009003756,0.00014452111,0.00002196534,0.00099469,0.00006420711,0.0004043365,0.000037708684,0.000050306415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009683157,0.00004203491,0.000055796158,0.0002332394,0.0007676898,0.00016761305,0.00004499053,0.0007789079,9.1569757e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006401771,0.000076827164,0.0052363668,0.0000019731935,0.00009971816,1.6965079e-7,0.008790325,0.0000075089897,0.0014004403,0.97770226,0.000028195373,0.0065921685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00786725,0.00090820016,0.020239979,0.0001652521,0.0007168593,0.001198505,0.40071708,0.00021901054,0.001850864,0.5175566,0.047821946,0.0007384083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015573094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06267076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46014565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009133323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023966255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9544331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W156214791","doi":"","title":"Equitable Obligations Duties, Defences and Remedies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Relation (database); Work (physics); Business; Sociology; Engineering; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.019507025147650313,"score_gpt":0.25717242669700363,"score_spread":0.2376654015493533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W156214791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078959605,0.00060986244,0.00036953457,0.0047671413,0.00009584877,0.00033564333,0.00007314592,0.00023430533,0.98561853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0719372,0.0042575384,0.0039000725,0.00003447899,0.0000974696,0.0000010456862,0.000029360866,0.000015180378,0.9197276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894905,0.000018871782,0.00015828972,0.0003224077,0.00023781032,0.0003135872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991114,0.00008650705,0.00022491133,0.00031050466,0.00018023195,0.000086446635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003792257,0.00014192403,0.00028108314,0.00039111337,0.0008373961,0.000019107185,0.000556078,0.0006264311,0.0002813728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007762583,0.00016394195,0.00006944822,0.00026975368,0.0021050104,0.00010701705,0.00041528099,0.0003696862,0.000057758552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074657423,0.00002429078,0.0030481163,0.0000354633,0.000060574355,0.000010657034,0.0011237023,7.857889e-7,0.000017038245,0.97341174,0.01497496,0.007285179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013136593,0.00001836449,0.0007496675,0.000083268926,0.000057656434,9.3249224e-7,0.0034268417,0.0000018016075,0.000030128062,0.10858824,0.8867512,0.00016058833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020376446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007941983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87177616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015677206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046337646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7755999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565115954","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-78954-3_8","title":"Equity Theory: Responding to the Material Exploitation of the Vulnerable but Capable","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Paternalism; Equity (law); Psychology; Normative; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0635847521268799,"score_gpt":0.3276893992245734,"score_spread":0.2641046470976935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565115954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019712846,0.000028253155,0.00022548252,0.0043433732,0.00037466802,0.00061107945,0.000080145954,0.00003575678,0.99232996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16001976,0.000083770625,0.00011705481,0.0003357736,0.00042462585,0.000038016886,0.000004663103,0.000015370004,0.83896095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877685,0.00017809046,0.00021906782,0.00018741403,0.00043813814,0.00020046311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990103,0.000266465,0.00015892903,0.00040109106,0.000106743224,0.000056440982],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016329247,0.00011353856,0.00014606875,0.00006222499,0.0016428062,0.00008194508,0.0006675966,0.00013464759,0.0018592433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018324249,0.00006393955,0.00010130477,0.00011891691,0.00023315594,0.00008526721,0.00026038833,0.00022444033,0.00013455945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014716458,0.0000043549226,9.80816e-7,0.0000034787565,0.000009262698,1.5411503e-7,0.0050054854,0.000020789284,0.00032253104,0.98185277,0.012038142,0.00072733575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003639249,0.0000099740455,0.000010986122,0.000025577467,0.000016927179,3.892543e-7,0.0013049182,0.0000020098382,0.00090955535,0.05912942,0.938458,0.00009580295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021162524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018196581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9264199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000138395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024258766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567259740","doi":"","title":"The Division of Responsibility and the Law of Tort","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Economic Justice; Normative; Punishment (psychology); Reflective equilibrium; Focus (optics); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Social contract; Epistemology; Primary goods; Political science; Philosophy; Liability; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.008137934507150809,"score_gpt":0.29521030133738746,"score_spread":0.2870723668302366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567259740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96807235,0.0025850781,0.00095375103,0.015951607,0.000040375908,0.00017783201,0.0000013155416,0.0000049735545,0.012212708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969115,0.0027118977,0.000018244345,0.000026462165,0.000045410718,0.0000016990572,6.385993e-8,0.0000018818901,0.00028280637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999057,0.00014443134,0.00016114971,0.000051653544,0.00019806981,0.0003876723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994597,0.00021423053,0.000117382864,0.000115232506,0.0000694771,0.0000240119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051201107,0.000030056503,0.00006658851,0.0000069795847,0.00076313276,0.000023812283,0.00021001647,0.00002212748,0.0000024097042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016256301,0.000014823531,0.00005037768,0.00009149749,0.0006969885,0.00005745743,0.000030236224,0.0003406344,6.7647954e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039700193,0.000012319858,0.00020102861,5.479749e-7,0.0000102216,2.0637462e-8,0.0011898522,0.000006947897,0.0000875422,0.9959438,0.0000020438938,0.0025060133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041268455,0.000043586602,0.0019093555,0.000005421945,0.000009092143,0.0000028968814,0.0045644487,0.000002439642,0.00014614179,0.983058,0.009824043,0.000021926187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031546312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025454443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028839175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014259841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011250917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99232846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571940683","doi":"","title":"Competing Notions of Fairness: A Principled Approach to the Intersection of Insolvency Law and Family Property Law in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Law; Family law; Creditor; Business; Real property; Trust law; Debt; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.027388302005392978,"score_gpt":0.24305004118621962,"score_spread":0.21566173918082665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571940683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86863357,0.00015229329,0.0030204435,0.00056859764,0.00005872412,0.00035631843,0.0000043466816,0.000005515992,0.12720017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995125,0.00006351674,0.00020844446,0.000087426524,0.000038594793,0.000014877636,5.2843865e-7,0.000004712206,0.00006939075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886537,0.000110556444,0.0002490657,0.00009674512,0.00018167344,0.00049657474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962014,0.000025031793,0.00013063566,0.00008978888,0.00008646259,0.000047949114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011390463,0.00005614256,0.00011114866,0.000024638965,0.00030629997,0.0000130809285,0.0002325724,0.000024636043,0.00000355237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029262064,0.000035071153,0.00002837173,0.0002311719,0.00011448188,0.00010306722,0.00004305905,0.00044613244,4.0641757e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011164135,0.000057046178,0.0020587465,0.000004703038,0.000014424092,8.9947676e-8,0.008192992,0.000041280062,0.00017933839,0.98839605,0.0000024163812,0.0010417658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018223048,0.00070493104,0.05526442,0.0002535495,0.000111749076,0.00007507388,0.7234522,0.0017213961,0.00073611666,0.17576383,0.03939658,0.00069784943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.961448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8126322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074221723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029532048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52388585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573013442","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n2p98","title":"Third Party Suspicion of Lack of Authority on the Part of Company Agents – A Comparative Study and a Suggested Rule","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Common law; Corporate law; Business; Agency (philosophy); Legislation; Law; Order (exchange); Database transaction; Liability; China; Commercial law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.2097412546974116,"score_gpt":0.4189091143575971,"score_spread":0.2091678596601855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573013442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882693,0.0000518243,0.0000036322274,0.0011106159,0.000036629113,0.00013170051,0.000023471292,0.0000010956703,0.010371719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997545,0.000018813205,0.000030961834,0.000052162875,0.000051445793,7.8445436e-7,2.8561675e-7,0.0000015100725,0.000089563364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914503,0.00016786785,0.000296731,0.000043631357,0.00026019433,0.000086523585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990391,0.00016032923,0.0003444044,0.000071886854,0.00028152022,0.00010273881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081957504,0.000043638043,0.00021362367,0.000018590166,0.000105994215,0.000014741712,0.00009404555,0.000025214791,0.0000061228893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054873562,0.000027287035,0.000032579883,0.00006695421,0.00034448336,0.0000471427,0.000029001001,0.00009225042,2.661154e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002310648,0.00041629208,0.013499407,0.000010140351,0.000041919488,6.439672e-7,0.024020024,0.000007520903,0.00005480382,0.9610805,0.0008263856,0.000019236228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048530423,0.004332039,0.42024836,0.00035932643,0.00046516667,0.000009118468,0.2662612,0.000665655,0.003900977,0.13121168,0.1673307,0.00036274779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018934222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065084564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82986885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001544797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084723455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28623006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573251718","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v2i1.165","title":"Domestic Contribution and Constructive Trusts: The Canadian Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Constructive trust; Perspective (graphical); Law; Constructive; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018822179042893485,"score_gpt":0.32668791602850183,"score_spread":0.3078657369856084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573251718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5958044,0.0034272138,0.0006156679,0.0912901,0.00076830585,0.0005389761,0.000022523735,0.000038551152,0.30749422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987258,0.0000398776,0.000061050014,0.00041466556,0.00068425864,0.0000049314494,2.4471908e-7,0.0000031270292,0.00006609396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926376,0.00017568601,0.00007633185,0.000047240985,0.00015053603,0.00028645498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931455,0.00019629994,0.00006789447,0.0000658787,0.00014815794,0.00020723345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012660469,0.000045137993,0.000052912626,0.000015287971,0.00598972,0.0002496685,0.00015756338,0.000034209457,0.00005254177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002076261,0.00002503328,0.000026217864,0.00010194566,0.0007617136,0.00018868965,0.000017710912,0.00029729647,0.000015258112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019273534,0.0000026150317,0.0017782289,1.07096945e-7,0.000013361002,8.066421e-7,0.017307568,0.0000025700263,0.000006416021,0.98053664,0.00009400743,0.0002557599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004810513,0.00002402736,0.06437167,0.000027268661,0.00013232342,0.00068805076,0.17125444,0.00006534981,0.000033482283,0.24599765,0.5167131,0.00021162556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34482774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.472674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.734539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039432914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019338584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99530435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573345140","doi":"","title":"Troubled Foundations for Private Law: A Review Essay of 'The Foundations of Private Law' by James Gordley","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Law; Tort; Comparative law; Unjust enrichment; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Philosophy of law; Scholarship; Public law; Commercial law; Property law; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Property rights; Liability; Restitution","score_opus":0.04135528012109518,"score_gpt":0.3713544855114989,"score_spread":0.3299992053904037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573345140","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000051922043,0.98497355,0.0032042565,0.0021582195,0.0001617937,0.0024435963,0.00015055038,0.000023547687,0.006879273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000256641,0.9961653,0.00036165313,0.00017397117,0.000269289,0.00032726684,0.000090264984,0.000048824524,0.0023068092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585664,0.00049453793,0.0013771993,0.00031623614,0.0005640275,0.001391343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965518,0.00036225005,0.0020534317,0.0005482919,0.00036959935,0.00011463757],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022188853,0.00032199113,0.0012528824,0.000073270334,0.0016982333,0.00007928183,0.001423201,0.00021656757,0.000057575322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033864545,0.00023328846,0.0012118965,0.0007935699,0.00064771046,0.00028304642,0.00010783321,0.0013740415,0.000013662735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019700599,0.00009036833,0.0000010417198,0.0014872623,0.00024753128,4.7959084e-8,0.000104725455,5.4356593e-7,0.0000012857005,0.94060844,0.0009872023,0.056469552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020734868,0.000050051538,2.767956e-7,0.004326735,0.0006532984,0.000027452588,0.000054109238,9.598028e-7,0.0000020024265,0.09183447,0.902641,0.0002022789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011581946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041737803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012848573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009386862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157384352","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1379","title":"The Constitutionalization of Quebec Libel Law, 1848-2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019067218228317348,"score_gpt":0.29376660022243856,"score_spread":0.2746993819941212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157384352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011125547,0.0005152983,0.008526742,0.010295346,0.0002463035,0.00013973947,0.000010132722,0.000027789234,0.9791261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976138,0.00019168423,0.00058841414,0.00030356587,0.00032371582,0.000005293821,0.000002651024,0.000005175159,0.00096574024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904335,0.00007008298,0.00024514066,0.00008278067,0.0003619811,0.00019664502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993277,0.00007135016,0.00017199818,0.00011732984,0.00020111694,0.00011050447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005486551,0.000060818275,0.000079899604,0.0000127850635,0.0026605325,0.00019584617,0.00028519836,0.00005761294,0.00006638448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052071086,0.000044399574,0.000076822726,0.00012983158,0.00089401565,0.0002661402,0.00002515486,0.00015993352,0.000033267104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039248084,0.000041540112,0.000054024174,0.0000015699424,0.000011910079,0.0000014933879,0.00058080675,0.0009030674,0.000093351395,0.99772614,0.00016354943,0.00041863503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031845737,0.000011890798,0.00015000481,0.000029214003,0.000014618215,0.000016030152,0.0006128101,0.0000063428433,0.00033451733,0.51507807,0.48335403,0.0000740121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31520942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83551836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016671779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065866596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574549064","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Damages for Personal Injury: Is it too late to take the facts seriously?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Damages; Law; Tort; Personal injury; Hindsight bias; Appeal; Political science; Trilogy; Tort reform; Pain and suffering; Liability; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.0793071962190169,"score_gpt":0.36143818425770446,"score_spread":0.2821309880386876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574549064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56856304,0.000023404444,0.00073096564,0.41190305,0.000020079711,0.000538547,0.000081537815,0.000032792283,0.01810657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528115,0.00015647965,0.0007356226,0.0007780435,0.00006343648,7.326432e-7,0.000004498792,0.0000042388015,0.04544544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988752,0.00008854042,0.00005144773,0.00019314777,0.00045244079,0.00033923078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992616,0.00016570682,0.000048902988,0.00016725886,0.00018393736,0.00017254888],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084527844,0.00006489222,0.000110572604,0.00007425753,0.0014438584,0.00007701535,0.0005132237,0.000071081915,0.00020041483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012323461,0.000060153518,0.00008625795,0.00038473224,0.0002166602,0.00019949187,0.0001022678,0.00017595458,0.00004601261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003258819,0.0001019369,0.00095179066,0.000030428,0.00006088667,0.0000071878326,0.5782865,0.000018113062,0.0027124858,0.049906883,0.34297577,0.02462211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002763563,0.00018898926,0.0098956,0.000026955347,0.00001332711,2.1731705e-7,0.036243334,0.00040871726,0.00011248983,0.004047204,0.9486577,0.00012912229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047803046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007169194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6056819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083236744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021535458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574854168","doi":"","title":"Public Fiduciary Obligations, Political Trusts, and the Equitable Duty of Reasonableness in Administrative Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Administrative law; Law; Obligation; Private law; Duty; Public law; Political science; Discretion; Municipal law","score_opus":0.04376392451542906,"score_gpt":0.3256361915711034,"score_spread":0.28187226705567436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574854168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44320756,0.0067233606,0.0015051415,0.08253178,0.00013009744,0.00073518563,0.00001540208,0.000029594361,0.4651219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977527,0.0011179098,0.000058240188,0.000146281,0.000071966664,0.000016923836,9.969076e-7,0.0000050447743,0.0008299404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975944,0.0004319353,0.00024008317,0.00011451637,0.00022829584,0.0013907597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933565,0.00025737224,0.00010069264,0.000103271246,0.00010125,0.00010174758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004642844,0.00006683288,0.00013522772,0.000037505684,0.00067487627,0.00009670881,0.00020011378,0.000058645743,0.000034396082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004391794,0.000048343496,0.00004614688,0.00030295295,0.00056079106,0.00026613375,0.000023602515,0.0006610244,0.0000022819756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010406795,0.000044278822,0.0015396399,0.000001707894,0.000014577267,3.0300183e-7,0.0005306575,9.633472e-7,0.000006915122,0.9974595,0.000011860078,0.0003791914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005910305,0.000030602005,0.0005716468,0.000007941377,0.00001157849,0.000026073189,0.019519739,0.000008751063,0.000046378005,0.96140677,0.017715905,0.00006361599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003019048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022004547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55454516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040057735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004283328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576456925","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Law’s ‘Holy Grail’: Reconciling Theory and Practice in Fiduciary Jurisprudence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Law; Obligation; Unjust enrichment; Holy Grail; Tort; Common law; Political science; Private law; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty; Comparative law; Restitution; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.010921864314824628,"score_gpt":0.3290009648101687,"score_spread":0.3180791004953441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576456925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86844623,0.0043038283,0.0010196877,0.019154724,0.00048694605,0.0003266439,0.0000036356791,0.00006304968,0.10619526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99199575,0.004853964,0.00040108542,0.0006772843,0.00060024933,0.000011051461,8.193289e-7,0.000012811742,0.0014469842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973994,0.00048488413,0.00025919746,0.00023561937,0.00027883818,0.0013420711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841875,0.0010221209,0.0001619674,0.00016713166,0.00009994506,0.00013009706],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013118022,0.00010677668,0.00012691026,0.00006525779,0.00085544115,0.00016405665,0.00035459557,0.000128296,0.000053928547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017724672,0.00010158707,0.000051450083,0.00022468143,0.00025879452,0.0007817921,0.00005476436,0.0028425597,0.000026531061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003126642,0.00004336284,0.00037288177,0.0000013353512,0.000013512778,0.0000041462695,0.0031661652,0.0000020518846,0.0010856697,0.9744472,0.00003271558,0.020799723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002892961,0.000047720303,0.0011728064,0.000015898964,0.000023364624,0.00024048082,0.0153257055,0.000008498347,0.00005797443,0.86662453,0.11599995,0.0001937928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032602258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07208785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12354953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027085512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002437605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576461159","doi":"","title":"Methods for Enforcing Civil Judgments in Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Plaintiff; Restitution; Writ; Creditor; Enforcement; Payment; Business; Order (exchange); Law; Debt; Action (physics); Civil procedure; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0339366948458636,"score_gpt":0.3964865785408555,"score_spread":0.3625498836949919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576461159","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18909992,0.0006165425,0.7226929,0.0018754071,0.00031867408,0.0004975795,6.491013e-7,0.000031061387,0.08486724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816782,0.00021044252,0.008044358,0.00012088553,0.00023557345,0.000011412104,0.0000010716918,0.000008763089,0.009689323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773353,0.000060100883,0.00022816997,0.00011116315,0.00014126113,0.0017257883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995571,0.00014939037,0.00009228262,0.00006969848,0.000048227877,0.000083342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009179226,0.00006288062,0.00009560967,0.000077592704,0.0004896548,0.00005464733,0.00022712597,0.000061475024,0.000051291554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009816147,0.000060211256,0.00007438458,0.00016241077,0.00003475235,0.0001597966,0.000017758604,0.00091262633,0.0000059142767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018696112,0.00003440585,0.00500424,8.8382893e-7,0.000019107974,3.404925e-7,0.003872631,0.000012483748,0.00021804252,0.9153354,0.000028013967,0.07545575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005221162,0.00006634365,0.0031967452,0.000009553751,0.000012720349,0.0000087830695,0.0067304843,0.000027189042,0.00014279543,0.5283569,0.46079835,0.00012803356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073958464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9617826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032632307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034868403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9322081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579145704","doi":"","title":"Indignities: Making a Place for Human Dignity in Modern Legal Thought","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Tort; Harm; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.041657771388748925,"score_gpt":0.33409941394011833,"score_spread":0.2924416425513694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579145704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8019665,0.0024630253,0.026891103,0.008765006,0.00018524355,0.0010324375,0.00001891721,0.0001259826,0.1585518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985076,0.0005959472,0.000113768096,0.00011235948,0.0005285737,0.000038662067,0.0000014180174,0.0000148554445,0.013518409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758756,0.00009595802,0.00022936356,0.00015784397,0.0002459278,0.0016833356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957854,0.00008523885,0.00011960624,0.00009598888,0.000057358193,0.00006328195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015754078,0.00009636493,0.00012776346,0.00009283305,0.0011735421,0.0001803761,0.00033460523,0.00007955672,0.00005256497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000776046,0.00009474026,0.000092392555,0.0002161829,0.00008383995,0.00041539932,0.000025339623,0.001007301,0.000012063604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075321327,0.00007728037,0.0006609344,0.000002975407,0.00001731383,0.0000010530331,0.0041395295,0.000042810345,0.000048784485,0.98595047,0.00012200234,0.008929325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011336766,0.00015012373,0.0002173512,0.00003885824,0.0000261801,0.000034056924,0.0328383,0.0010026679,0.000024834275,0.76207805,0.20211726,0.00033867062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000829044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052132856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22387244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010862928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007162653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96516323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580558322","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2736","title":"Some “What If” Thoughts: Notes on Donoghue v Stevenson","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Greatness; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Tort; Law; Original meaning; Epistemology; Law and economics; History; Sociology; Political science; Literature; Art; Liability","score_opus":0.03042638628225194,"score_gpt":0.3090913819887659,"score_spread":0.278664995706514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580558322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015511685,0.00067689153,0.0023883001,0.040201876,0.0017160355,0.0003070792,0.000010017915,0.00015361462,0.9390345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113125,0.0008470643,0.0008645008,0.0016592286,0.004394934,0.000008028203,0.0000018429789,0.000017159484,0.001076016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984961,0.00022876525,0.000236874,0.00019450372,0.00045289297,0.00039082274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989801,0.00027303494,0.00015917807,0.00022260049,0.00008871891,0.00027635612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094656326,0.00012701697,0.00016288384,0.000035452507,0.001834502,0.0007599603,0.00041190433,0.00010834224,0.00013484231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114886985,0.000100884936,0.00012723889,0.0001070479,0.00017112533,0.0008351751,0.00004094631,0.00039243852,0.00035534383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073566225,0.00006312505,0.0000615976,0.000002221294,0.000010555914,0.0000028181857,0.000957191,0.00009226176,0.000106919906,0.9880412,0.00042691757,0.01022781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031038752,0.00007617522,0.0002898966,0.000072776464,0.000016665883,0.000011194782,0.0009075081,0.00008189264,0.00062411994,0.33536634,0.6620541,0.00018890585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006919391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031237809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97561955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010680598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000616699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580846857","doi":"","title":"Flexibility in conflict of laws multistate tort cases: the way forward in Australia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Flexibility (engineering); Jurisdiction; Project commissioning; Jurisprudence; Test (biology); Publishing; Conflict of laws; Common law; Choice of law; Political science; Economics; Management; Liability","score_opus":0.046935396655812686,"score_gpt":0.2757558477163773,"score_spread":0.2288204510605646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580846857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944131,0.000022722246,0.00063963386,0.0009902447,0.000026836926,0.00049412175,0.00084035826,0.00002872415,0.00254427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966428,0.00007716306,0.0005524152,0.000010476493,0.000017595643,1.4124568e-7,0.000016023569,0.000010258508,0.0026731202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983325,0.00022950077,0.00029130408,0.0003889937,0.00038475564,0.0003729743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867815,0.00015820192,0.00037786702,0.00046355222,0.00018679877,0.00013545636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084256096,0.00018246747,0.00045151392,0.00018641095,0.000311129,0.000010677075,0.00077965047,0.00021286478,0.00038778782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054249063,0.00019007054,0.00021940545,0.0004652027,0.0012418119,0.00014381997,0.00019279751,0.0002532774,0.00017244557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006969427,0.000525474,0.5894942,0.00011807403,0.000118756,0.00011861,0.39742783,0.0019443687,0.00025088445,0.008114877,0.00005691744,0.0011330077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005569684,0.000106584426,0.20119008,0.00028559845,0.00011900432,0.000003887278,0.77054626,0.00014085506,0.000093011746,0.005896934,0.0154957445,0.00055233017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46657035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3110743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38830417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020800339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021993011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7750852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583608980","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.003","title":"Recognition of common law trusts in civil law jurisdictions under the Hague Trusts Convention with particular regard to the Italian experience","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Public law","score_opus":0.04195520688644441,"score_gpt":0.25412025290735324,"score_spread":0.21216504602090883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583608980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0098319445,0.00005656413,0.00021347083,0.0006455806,0.00009667075,0.00091972033,0.00014568432,0.00004192588,0.98804843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7455327,0.00003547157,0.0000170345,0.0001941862,0.00008873961,0.000015678797,0.0000252578,0.000014386949,0.25407657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885017,0.00014084252,0.00018648269,0.00025349783,0.0003224464,0.00024653773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902076,0.000087120265,0.0001944245,0.00043466414,0.00013777296,0.00012524071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027900148,0.00016354618,0.00019747096,0.000045813136,0.00081816484,0.00005766394,0.00044273224,0.0001719474,0.000015940383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000036474105,0.00012553248,0.00010804659,0.00003783025,0.00095445564,0.00016475061,0.00013098597,0.00029321315,0.000014555405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003111703,0.000024092655,0.000009301595,0.00001006639,0.00003121964,0.000004024493,0.0042659077,0.000016187658,0.000010749783,0.994777,0.0005501911,0.0002701149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022901494,0.000028661207,0.00016265103,0.00013315667,0.0001377926,0.0000020325353,0.0026538137,0.0000096537005,0.0002575883,0.00021473922,0.9959787,0.00019216059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013366112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024664408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99542856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018371768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000752892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583966982","doi":"","title":"Addressing Aboriginal Land Rights in Ontario: An Analysis of Past Policies and Options for the Future - Part 1","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Deferral; Negotiation; Investment (military); Land use; Resolution (logic); Political science; Economics; Public economics; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.02355544656310162,"score_gpt":0.346499677539508,"score_spread":0.3229442309764064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583966982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899759,0.0011314092,0.00086227653,0.007035956,0.000038251885,0.00013311977,0.00000998563,0.0000064709657,0.0008066009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974404,0.0010197292,0.0001520391,0.00003810724,0.00067780365,0.000010603168,0.000004225309,0.0000025110742,0.0006545819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989852,0.00004943509,0.00015649389,0.00008570572,0.0001341352,0.0005890821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965924,0.00006000399,0.00009519267,0.00008020924,0.00005466556,0.00005067187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000981839,0.00005369443,0.00011077458,0.0000955621,0.0007817389,0.00008425885,0.00015875901,0.00003975397,0.000032070217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000040711816,0.000035874033,0.000065429136,0.0002896416,0.00009434461,0.00019964986,0.000006356531,0.00043043008,3.6608395e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012540824,0.000050722516,0.048853733,5.6744756e-7,0.00014455494,6.917561e-8,0.0051900214,0.00082406384,0.000012362736,0.9418339,0.000027843163,0.0030496314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038284104,0.000066632696,0.14679483,0.000008621432,0.00041215593,0.000006273842,0.009690669,0.0007914367,0.000005030353,0.039930254,0.80179197,0.00011929855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12095911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9019036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041562493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010200121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8848945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583969317","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004155633.i-342","title":"Re-examining Contract and Unjust Enrichment: Anglo-Canadian Perspectives (","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Law; Mistake; Common law; Breach of contract; Unconscionability; Political science; Fiduciary; Doctrine; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.03865848789430604,"score_gpt":0.31806140701663205,"score_spread":0.279402919122326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583969317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012311703,0.0011327115,0.00004660185,0.0019169617,0.00008076498,0.0003299676,0.00003971472,0.000066639375,0.9962635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20944595,0.00059749023,0.00017381387,0.0005077027,0.0006292138,0.000009055471,0.000019492025,0.000017322973,0.78859997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988174,0.000029371175,0.00016622919,0.00034244187,0.0002514905,0.00039307398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901974,0.00018633717,0.000088518274,0.00017799363,0.00010006845,0.00042735462],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005063698,0.0001558094,0.00018670165,0.00014984234,0.0007321257,0.00017486594,0.00020984934,0.00030069912,0.0018468796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060389608,0.00015324376,0.000045743698,0.000105408035,0.0003591984,0.00014759027,0.00003314656,0.00028792687,0.0001229647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012055659,0.000009838297,0.0001426492,0.000004991391,0.000024805799,0.0000080395785,0.012164557,1.5870849e-7,8.6205176e-7,0.9630193,0.020280825,0.004342776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008343991,0.000016079868,0.0011338252,0.000020820251,0.000026275518,4.5519855e-7,0.015366165,0.0000023942164,5.404496e-7,0.003873775,0.97926706,0.00020914107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16569643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6937496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000668553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012038478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585230786","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the ‘Manner and Form’ Theory of Parliamentary Sovereignty","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Parliamentary sovereignty; Parliament; Statute; Sovereignty; Popular sovereignty; Law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Commonwealth; Legislative intent; Legislation; Constitutional theory; Law and economics; Constitution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023017237002276952,"score_gpt":0.28055434303467786,"score_spread":0.2575371060324009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585230786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4419284,0.00011233556,0.00024313755,0.009306924,0.0000143389625,0.00025328455,0.00000220305,0.00001880762,0.54812056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698436,0.000058791084,0.00024412497,0.0005414815,0.00010771886,0.000015902617,4.5549857e-7,0.0000017663555,0.0020454251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996701,0.00004182903,0.00007376897,0.00005401591,0.00007765902,0.00008261395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969673,0.00013823921,0.00003277443,0.00008074981,0.000024849523,0.000026668231],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003645118,0.000025188632,0.00003815361,0.0000047626017,0.00025969118,0.000035074845,0.00009249064,0.000014496858,0.0014350421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002562826,0.000014115602,0.000017711087,0.000045610308,0.0001452668,0.00012292528,0.000039962386,0.00003255626,0.000023786462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.443861e-7,0.0000024039537,0.0011882362,0.0000019787879,0.0000030548274,1.21484085e-8,0.0013802086,2.0996498e-7,0.000047560214,0.9654774,0.0004974155,0.031401154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011621939,0.000008763731,0.03138691,0.000015238803,0.000015259895,3.4059468e-7,0.06301379,0.000101820595,0.00034118624,0.79351,0.11138686,0.00010356548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004052889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094065355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.555056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069291723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013614441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587368982","doi":"","title":"Misfeasance in Public Office: A Very Peculiar Tort","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Damages; Law; Political science; Recklessness; Misconduct; Harm; Public interest; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.03990089576628642,"score_gpt":0.29002236407637827,"score_spread":0.25012146831009185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587368982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69691783,0.002046684,0.0017219286,0.0056285076,0.00025406101,0.0002761331,0.0000021762346,0.00007449125,0.29307818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993728,0.0024791409,0.00009699765,0.00011417555,0.0002866353,0.000011053238,6.440737e-7,0.000008769513,0.003274584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976931,0.000092312635,0.00019153347,0.00014342724,0.00025007752,0.0016295278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995768,0.00002124612,0.00008884145,0.00012284401,0.00006936583,0.00012090768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017402289,0.00007566268,0.00009684874,0.00007152161,0.00041190122,0.000067633155,0.00041714497,0.00006686138,0.00018390377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009473176,0.000072080984,0.00006865448,0.00034035766,0.0000966446,0.0003389001,0.000027049515,0.0009525547,0.00010490205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010570178,0.000083179126,0.0061310804,7.9466855e-7,0.000013686174,0.0000023055456,0.0018495629,6.185414e-7,0.00003118617,0.9866107,0.00013730579,0.005128978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007201826,0.00012889114,0.02758554,0.000018781935,0.000017608787,0.000058061538,0.017788233,0.000018796558,0.000038986647,0.45094663,0.50231886,0.0003594065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023708462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036949363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5356641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087166374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036124894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9806238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588607344","doi":"10.7202/043775ar","title":"NICHOLAS KASIRER et PIERRE NOREAU (dir.), Sources et instruments de justice en droit privé, Montréal, Thémis, 2002, 627 p., ISBN 2-89400-153-3.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011145665380120691,"score_gpt":0.2694879315456688,"score_spread":0.2583422661655481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588607344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67956877,0.030259114,0.0076662214,0.020883828,0.0010905147,0.0012013422,0.00031974775,0.00031146425,0.25869903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69440633,0.017457519,0.008595867,0.011107201,0.0007162045,0.00021401222,0.00007807965,0.00016516217,0.2672596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522823,0.00095498626,0.00067793636,0.0008379161,0.0007895484,0.0015113741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974323,0.0005180895,0.0003956626,0.0007295108,0.0001420704,0.00078239385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021066444,0.00053278427,0.00053575315,0.0001343226,0.0014385214,0.0005103211,0.0009946544,0.000993227,0.000822614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073855463,0.0006228629,0.00033815077,0.00090041413,0.0011556434,0.0007774912,0.0001439022,0.0016622875,0.00067721814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032285872,0.00056104903,0.003029126,0.00017305561,0.00024055151,0.00004642705,0.028712166,0.0010782538,0.00027206383,0.91800463,0.026237752,0.021612639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008633143,0.00008360259,0.004469968,0.00014400108,0.00048160643,0.000055087214,0.008530617,0.0007279519,0.00032370724,0.035287112,0.94827664,0.0007564101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010763004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007130161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92203885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021070703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008477558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590185570","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v3i1.168","title":"Co-ownership Trusts in the United Kingdom - The Denning Legacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constructive trust; Confusion; Constructive; Law; Kingdom; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.13440605068451353,"score_gpt":0.3858696663556629,"score_spread":0.2514636156711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590185570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8983741,0.0003007045,0.00027431428,0.029218335,0.00028920066,0.00023169731,0.0000012351197,0.000033678407,0.071276724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577296,0.00002656255,0.00008224716,0.0022228353,0.0016706971,0.000013588138,0.0000013345328,0.000011236845,0.00019856081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977354,0.0008955267,0.00024054709,0.00008262663,0.00049734063,0.0005485526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858123,0.00082202937,0.0001812095,0.00025609334,0.00005062227,0.00010879847],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006451923,0.000100893376,0.000096214055,0.000046741075,0.0046443394,0.00078016514,0.0011246902,0.00005991632,0.000105624014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019893427,0.000045602203,0.00008553694,0.00055592647,0.00045638607,0.00047816892,0.000042966436,0.0008983067,0.00006415324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008696431,0.00003457084,0.006497792,0.0000012449345,0.00001659093,0.000004261624,0.064293824,0.00015457056,0.0000871745,0.92680943,0.0013497671,0.00074206345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027899168,0.0000126086,0.01926222,0.00004407598,0.00004488445,0.00011215212,0.0542908,0.00012247455,0.00006168847,0.005751331,0.9198687,0.00015005663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008322498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019958706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9210581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009520264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006689662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590258717","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498671.008","title":"Pluralism in Tort and Accident Law: Towards a Reasonable Accommodation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Accommodation; Pluralism (philosophy); Action (physics); Psychology; Evening; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0347290513566167,"score_gpt":0.256264502511724,"score_spread":0.2215354511551073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590258717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014362625,0.00008909369,0.00003635578,0.00029140397,0.00006280976,0.00045858402,0.000056214052,0.0000687874,0.9975005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036906235,0.000559451,0.000053929074,0.000105726096,0.00013884135,0.000002333452,0.000036142614,0.000016174792,0.96218115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990147,0.000040103758,0.00013665714,0.00033277587,0.00024684428,0.00022891474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934584,0.000036537847,0.00012231116,0.00025730577,0.00009146596,0.00014656347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018339555,0.00016677352,0.00022321953,0.00008181888,0.00039234431,0.00009871248,0.0003380292,0.000280182,0.000013841644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009269654,0.00020546943,0.000070344046,0.000013445605,0.00026449026,0.00019750306,0.0002646426,0.00021456936,0.0000073489896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014224142,0.0000064016217,0.00002797597,0.000007356078,0.000013805089,0.000037966478,0.00039766185,0.000001131111,0.00000288641,0.9936816,0.0038530943,0.0019559136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024879188,0.000007690604,0.0003110175,0.000062298386,0.00004081803,0.0000019552094,0.00022505333,0.00001035429,0.000009257363,0.00019704687,0.9986634,0.00022228864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040550552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032041355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99481034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037360837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016613374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9658385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590395160","doi":"","title":"Constructive appropriation - the key to constructive expropriation? Guidelines from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Appropriation; Constructive; Law; Doctrine; Law and economics; Constructive trust; Jurisprudence; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07304676549471395,"score_gpt":0.34265128982788245,"score_spread":0.2696045243331685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590395160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68274975,0.0004410065,0.02533078,0.021529086,0.0015125085,0.0005413818,0.00056411535,0.000017772756,0.26731357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950808,0.00001136364,0.0031317673,0.0003898506,0.00088830956,0.000003793719,0.0000042392817,0.0000041430085,0.00048572695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987785,0.00007985145,0.00042677994,0.00011826214,0.00046594144,0.0001306539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771684,0.00032873405,0.00038796174,0.00007057671,0.0013716904,0.00012421746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005986827,0.00008785237,0.00015068553,0.000040501745,0.0004953072,0.000100239966,0.00030808346,0.000034223765,0.00008032969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001674145,0.000060445356,0.00004358223,0.00012987979,0.00026626227,0.00016326598,0.00004531114,0.00014775364,0.000016291726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016175736,0.000039840983,0.0028010316,8.2360566e-7,0.00023191117,0.0000033045783,0.08233311,0.00011917524,0.00051967555,0.9072296,0.0032010928,0.0033586659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045920647,0.00003959575,0.003542053,0.000031778494,0.000033543034,0.0000074377854,0.16379029,0.00009279925,0.0005265502,0.04341278,0.7879024,0.00016158594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14494938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34618258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86381686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018509472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028985442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8607445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590417720","doi":"","title":"The Problem with Pure Economic Loss","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Doctrine; Duty; Denial; Law and economics; Nothing; Set (abstract data type); Autonomy; Variety (cybernetics); Economics; Law; Liability; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010966393257720834,"score_gpt":0.22584509304892886,"score_spread":0.21487869979120802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590417720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87036425,0.00008361765,0.00023819612,0.02511674,0.000023713672,0.00029037645,0.000043876546,0.000064391235,0.10377482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739623,0.000039118553,0.00089065236,0.000036023357,0.000040845072,2.8542615e-7,0.0000028227855,0.0000034313232,0.0015905928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993728,0.00007999676,0.000055195716,0.00013920016,0.0001533747,0.00019942653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943376,0.000036533824,0.0000963711,0.00026123493,0.00007096311,0.00010111571],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042022613,0.00006376927,0.0000993267,0.000033201828,0.0023748286,0.00005991812,0.0005557143,0.000061740306,0.00002601394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000062672298,0.00005700379,0.000065682216,0.00016879104,0.0003821238,0.0002585434,0.00005359955,0.0002557622,0.000068888614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085983316,0.00006394279,0.035218373,0.000006029569,0.00005449132,0.000011699928,0.03504594,0.00023779704,0.00003596429,0.9185063,0.001686356,0.009047095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006014809,0.00010263303,0.056798447,0.000019600888,0.00005650005,0.0000024273713,0.03377229,0.000051812607,0.0000124553835,0.007637112,0.9007382,0.00020708029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007035772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006656735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91086924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008146991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000187355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590859285","doi":"10.5040/9781474200530.ch-003","title":"Registration of Invalid Dispositions : Who Gets the Property?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051950208179005135,"score_gpt":0.27546709643865985,"score_spread":0.2235168882596547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590859285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034281198,0.000044494613,0.00031837611,0.013495264,0.00013976428,0.0005397258,0.000059558854,0.0000793276,0.9852892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07502492,0.00002565705,0.00008351842,0.00056159013,0.0007749902,0.000061614686,0.00006277879,0.00002818125,0.92337674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850816,0.00007471312,0.00036476285,0.0002683084,0.000577921,0.00020614319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849194,0.00015408674,0.00041881402,0.0005279716,0.00030814653,0.00009901247],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011407149,0.0001544572,0.00020870597,0.000060701703,0.0009064235,0.001247919,0.00072486,0.0002727266,0.00013531718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002489846,0.000097977325,0.00014547633,0.000020508462,0.00049257843,0.0003872278,0.0001166828,0.00044673253,0.000038332153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018620714,0.0000042595834,0.0000020204616,0.000015519548,0.000016195096,4.822583e-7,0.0022949227,0.0000011144592,0.00003438431,0.9382261,0.051680576,0.007722543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052131225,0.0000122236215,0.00002607526,0.00012731919,0.00003951933,6.6345876e-7,0.000106412524,0.000012091252,0.000035561374,0.031477086,0.9679717,0.00013921855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027578166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071764532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077144876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003796716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591818506","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2015.1047655","title":"Good Faith Duties in Contract Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fair dealing; Law; Honesty; Good faith; Obligation; Bad faith; Loyalty; Power (physics); Faith; Unconscionability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01579050959091266,"score_gpt":0.2533316598242262,"score_spread":0.2375411502333135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591818506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4195266,0.000019015468,0.00030415802,0.004302915,0.000102046615,0.00009264369,0.0000039836923,0.000028270173,0.57562035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764705,0.00055919774,0.00030059303,0.0003235517,0.00015389473,2.1354371e-7,0.0000014693795,0.0000043885275,0.0010096594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899113,0.00021134969,0.00014406703,0.0000993867,0.00021982397,0.00033425138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993462,0.00010612267,0.00013362193,0.000117381016,0.00008418508,0.0002124858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086603867,0.000071374634,0.00013411304,0.00006523562,0.0019900568,0.0000821711,0.00040300118,0.0000666139,0.00012112303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021720925,0.00007351188,0.000044045544,0.00022822738,0.00019821349,0.00048575015,0.000052049294,0.00040701337,0.000009571142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023195293,0.000047855065,0.030828618,0.0000049794376,0.000004654534,0.000004427906,0.001696101,0.00007435604,0.0000017956761,0.95935196,0.0001705648,0.0077914665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004935974,0.00004973472,0.026776431,0.000021147667,0.0000060205075,0.0000054030525,0.0027853162,0.00038478212,0.000004216673,0.0010619059,0.96831715,0.00009428158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006802718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05888196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002644137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016905079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593030345","doi":"10.21991/c9qm2f","title":"Royal Succession and the Canadian Crown as a Corporation Sole: A Critique of Canada's Succession to the Throne Act, 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Parks Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Ecological succession; Statutory law; Law; Corporate law; Constitution; Throne; Crown (dentistry); Management; Political science; Economics; Politics; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.01039906631768936,"score_gpt":0.26718739993042645,"score_spread":0.2567883336127371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593030345","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021357369,0.0006434214,0.043972824,0.54007685,0.0017931164,0.0026837436,0.00043094959,0.000090121874,0.3889516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935583,0.00004448654,0.00019208035,0.0044184932,0.00020566428,0.00016219332,0.000048787464,0.0000061034484,0.0013638983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977719,0.00024099278,0.0004278161,0.0003356703,0.0006383112,0.0005852697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998144,0.0003777838,0.00020100741,0.0003309512,0.0004992384,0.00044702014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001233385,0.00019571326,0.00024250745,0.00009379195,0.0066315355,0.00023682533,0.0005102907,0.00015202818,0.00015844313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010043893,0.00012788133,0.000079145284,0.00037740194,0.0059066103,0.00031932903,0.00014388537,0.00026626914,0.000028444336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004831378,0.000017958977,0.0024161607,0.000006272335,0.00001534203,0.0000012973156,0.0002901133,0.001015445,0.00002214553,0.95942765,0.036084928,0.000654349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007997252,0.000023937668,0.0015107212,0.00009526298,0.000033511857,0.000018070896,0.0017154885,0.0018352225,0.00010082826,0.023343664,0.9702934,0.00023015808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9707772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97220093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042825364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011850509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99679875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159336626","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701729.003.0019","title":"Fiduciary Authority and the Service Conception","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Delegated authority; Directive; Possession (linguistics); Warrant; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Traditional authority","score_opus":0.031675879063600185,"score_gpt":0.24451928557364472,"score_spread":0.21284340651004452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159336626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013113342,0.00003780084,0.00031337378,0.001194859,0.00007804924,0.00040620705,0.000043167744,0.000069377034,0.997726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011821973,0.00037793125,0.000056996927,0.00023343529,0.0002996973,0.0000013280343,0.000011127466,0.000010585256,0.9871869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992516,0.000090550646,0.000086417334,0.00023029323,0.00019597182,0.0001451359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993138,0.00013758992,0.00009773376,0.0002532,0.000106125764,0.00009158324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032830547,0.0001251128,0.00017133066,0.000024366062,0.0009869196,0.000066685236,0.00037824828,0.00024036635,0.00003989507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008900719,0.00011114483,0.000075389595,0.0000073599876,0.00064995396,0.000051564748,0.00022945611,0.00028405656,0.0000025068146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025877129,0.0000013993088,0.0000013012946,0.000012022929,0.000019757357,0.000001066732,0.002118581,8.2166963e-7,8.413849e-7,0.99310535,0.0009566867,0.0037563203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035375197,0.0000050764647,0.000012275581,0.000023526778,0.000093332164,3.5336095e-7,0.00028981152,0.000044769076,0.0000014275674,0.007848466,0.99119174,0.0001354617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002775102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018226794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070526934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085530315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7590687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593907394","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511494956","title":"Commercial Trusts in European Private Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Convention; Scope (computer science); Common law; Section (typography); Investment (military); Pension; Index (typography); Accounting; Law; Liability; Law and economics; Terminology; Business; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.033022631860165685,"score_gpt":0.31370109617780095,"score_spread":0.28067846431763527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593907394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005228203,0.000028811808,0.000017809463,0.0025789351,0.00004937442,0.00027001952,0.0000065840245,0.000088899025,0.9969073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015771713,0.00008021941,0.00019309604,0.0022488402,0.00078749715,0.000004546049,0.000030894495,0.000018206481,0.980865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902964,0.00011665868,0.00020598693,0.00020350661,0.00021694286,0.00022726133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995695,0.000041777974,0.000071498354,0.00020531488,0.000023157098,0.000088801804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045133114,0.00011375948,0.00015894121,0.000038998725,0.00026337217,0.00008669289,0.00043276072,0.00013161133,0.00046428727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013672305,0.0001098306,0.00006681585,0.00007807313,0.00017763066,0.00006885693,0.000067252775,0.000294355,0.0008116235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.5835967e-7,0.000018730196,0.000010287311,0.0000019648728,0.0000018545204,0.000004574216,0.00061539013,6.697428e-7,4.4091323e-7,0.9386676,0.05148461,0.00919302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008290583,0.0000067096626,0.0008261312,0.000020873244,0.0000045960996,1.0462171e-7,0.000021879508,7.12208e-7,7.473455e-7,0.030478528,0.96841645,0.00014036283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022733328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031260446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018086769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001886284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596394876","doi":"","title":"Justiciability and standing to challenge legislation in the Commonwealth: a tale of the traditionalist and judicial activist approaches","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Adjudication; Constitutionality; Judicial review; Political science; Legislation; Constitution; Complaint; Judicial discretion; Common law; Politics","score_opus":0.21682462579469947,"score_gpt":0.3520220948740729,"score_spread":0.1351974690793734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596394876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87857664,0.00039491782,0.0006339067,0.008693857,0.00006575909,0.00023904262,0.000082169354,0.0000017192751,0.11131199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996931,0.00002659905,0.000107060754,0.000051716062,0.000077070865,0.0000048933125,5.603257e-7,0.000001684544,0.000037298916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992455,0.0002079304,0.00019607003,0.00007100467,0.00021441907,0.00006504188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939954,0.00027035037,0.00016748358,0.00004209238,0.00008332717,0.0000371778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007361804,0.000048604677,0.00010879501,0.000027888476,0.00031190028,0.000052030267,0.00012832912,0.000020033327,0.000010259791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007405753,0.00003012065,0.000024988973,0.0000895209,0.00034860626,0.000110826375,0.000018652572,0.00011742683,3.2265655e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025094036,0.00008773092,0.0024516643,0.0000034680963,0.000014542616,1.8792205e-7,0.06862836,0.000030088098,0.000034992332,0.92844427,0.00004093274,0.00023868818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016470349,0.00034645956,0.10818798,0.00021696869,0.00009029593,0.000028550838,0.32185474,0.0006738407,0.00013858992,0.33249184,0.23399852,0.0003252074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022429216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019868657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5959524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036411355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003661877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23989162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597286103","doi":"","title":"Down Under Exceptionalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Jurisdiction; Exceptionalism; Law; Autonomy; Incentive; Political science; American exceptionalism; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.012027734976223043,"score_gpt":0.3058393177112851,"score_spread":0.293811582735062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597286103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7982569,0.0003442507,0.01142925,0.05005985,0.00076968793,0.00018905073,0.000003916702,0.00010077891,0.13884634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857326,0.00069887727,0.00012189358,0.00026698344,0.0013756057,0.0000052145133,0.000001452193,0.0000070880465,0.011790257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983343,0.000042143147,0.00011491028,0.000096724776,0.00025941292,0.0011525088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962574,0.000034112643,0.000061847604,0.00009777516,0.00007654676,0.00010399556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014542599,0.000054952885,0.000055054217,0.000034035915,0.00087486237,0.00009946402,0.00027753238,0.00007162818,0.0005983548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043991575,0.000048432135,0.00006698194,0.00013185375,0.00012494459,0.00016931343,0.0000182438,0.0015815846,0.00020816871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014362977,0.000020118114,0.00025016195,1.5981833e-7,0.000011013331,1.5104331e-7,0.00031937595,0.000003786088,0.0008991323,0.99292076,0.00024160637,0.005332276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010166805,0.00001028867,0.0012120359,7.8890866e-7,0.0000055608807,0.000024165978,0.0019233323,0.0000033125195,0.0000099713,0.67999417,0.31665263,0.000062081446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007621296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029312043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31641102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026564137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023988164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98840046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599550406","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977626.013","title":"Justice in the <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i> Book <scp>v</scp>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09106606279021817,"score_gpt":0.28190227775798515,"score_spread":0.19083621496776698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599550406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000356287,0.00038793896,0.00013817969,0.0003284346,0.00016837177,0.00065286097,0.00012905816,0.000099255354,0.9980603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022445973,0.0009768779,0.00003076625,0.0013612384,0.0003147003,0.0000031857965,0.000019945448,0.000028020515,0.9950207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982641,0.00023911711,0.00019289134,0.00042869052,0.00047705494,0.00039818007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980063,0.00086794305,0.00021026107,0.0006030736,0.0001486998,0.0001637412],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079658127,0.00025730082,0.00025501318,0.00010080868,0.001017507,0.00009183346,0.001434139,0.00063192245,0.000010175489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010423164,0.00025444524,0.00018507103,0.000022373275,0.0007516804,0.00013252973,0.00029387974,0.0015729679,0.00007800736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034695174,0.000013800828,0.0000012380063,0.000031677115,0.000020311805,0.000047496032,0.006185513,4.379162e-7,0.0000023908815,0.88355887,0.109979115,0.000155684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018547766,0.000014860969,0.000016099013,0.000066923196,0.0002265757,0.0000019877336,0.0020237293,0.0000029354223,0.000013002515,0.00024009406,0.99707955,0.00012874743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004488076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045255522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88710046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020106859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042428277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599641208","doi":"","title":"Conquering the Common Law Hydra: A Probably Correct and Reasonable Overview of Current Standards of Appellate and Judicial Review","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Standard of review; Supreme court; Discretion; Judicial review; Political science; Common law; Correctness; Judgement; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.028317676050508042,"score_gpt":0.3585002713831039,"score_spread":0.33018259533259586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599641208","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09722765,0.8682517,0.0006653354,0.010165792,0.00010138382,0.00094260985,0.000025548892,0.000020311738,0.0225997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6912109,0.30858937,0.000007079126,0.00009800994,0.000053033,0.0000018535042,4.3028646e-7,0.0000026954858,0.000036596637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986911,0.00013499844,0.0002626813,0.000093243565,0.00029725244,0.0005207497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994563,0.00004587814,0.00023697778,0.00009075979,0.00011704982,0.000053066004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029289252,0.000072179224,0.00022851468,0.000014182158,0.00036409264,0.000028243827,0.0001478784,0.000026516995,0.000008831248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000445154,0.000050520368,0.000048957365,0.00015477445,0.00020654796,0.00009643704,0.00002765404,0.00048290275,3.376695e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010661641,0.000024436627,0.00013815422,0.000073726114,0.000016706532,1.3684532e-7,0.00038850185,0.0000019918784,0.000046720295,0.8926243,0.000118153584,0.106556475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054123724,0.0003975773,0.0005664312,0.002105567,0.0001779398,0.00007038395,0.001072369,0.000040374696,0.00013015956,0.5755671,0.4191353,0.0001955502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007960248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004961398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5939833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016688858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010370061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2800343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599686277","doi":"","title":"Developments in Foreseeability and Remoteness: The Limits of Contract Damages","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Breach of contract; Mill; Law; Exchequer; Compensation (psychology); Force majeure; Unjust enrichment; Business; Restitution; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02059351250211198,"score_gpt":0.32338449600253977,"score_spread":0.30279098350042777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599686277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819936,0.0008841481,0.00022533887,0.008945634,0.000017735954,0.00014243342,6.119973e-7,0.0000056259873,0.007784878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967622,0.0028313783,0.00005924217,0.000083385064,0.000046082012,0.0000012113085,2.4474937e-7,0.0000018944012,0.0002143224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988659,0.00009944005,0.0001661238,0.00007613792,0.00016045573,0.0006319143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967444,0.00008201797,0.000082679886,0.00007116665,0.000053837823,0.000035877412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002440353,0.000044112323,0.00007998836,0.000025965912,0.00029429246,0.00003368701,0.00020147185,0.00003507368,0.0000033372087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016233807,0.000029943258,0.00002377642,0.0001533534,0.00009856766,0.00012428603,0.000010332163,0.0004803612,8.962931e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013813912,0.000048920203,0.023957884,0.0000010039593,0.000009964847,3.4733057e-7,0.002054956,0.0000056031913,0.00022748928,0.8661437,0.0000062616386,0.10753003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033904976,0.00006532935,0.5162924,0.00001349171,0.00000713857,0.00001075959,0.0041063167,0.00001963251,0.00009205938,0.46958885,0.0093914,0.00007362145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007041896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01634679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49233449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022693102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012442882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9121892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600686206","doi":"","title":"損害賠償 豫定額의 職權減額上 參酌의 基準時와 參酌 事由 - 부동산 매매계약에 있어서 ‘解除 후 時價의 變動’이 참작사유로 될 수 있는가? (대상판례 : 2004. 12. 10. 선고 2002다73852) -","year":2005,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"민사법학","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Real estate; Database transaction; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029924826899481994,"score_gpt":0.3132953849565302,"score_spread":0.2833705580570482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600686206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12497739,0.007021728,0.0005934172,0.07974384,0.0020800233,0.0022679903,0.000817112,0.0007692904,0.7817292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7038874,0.0009038402,0.0009918011,0.0021008526,0.004906814,0.00018408976,0.00006530116,0.00008617175,0.28687373],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461335,0.0002859411,0.0009858977,0.0011785603,0.0012349699,0.0017012533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968954,0.00030249768,0.0004659849,0.0012056257,0.0002892273,0.0008412618],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010893202,0.00062378944,0.0006621504,0.00015168049,0.002051389,0.00068745203,0.0015921728,0.0006154494,0.02703545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027172358,0.0006266746,0.00047318704,0.0010464411,0.00081495807,0.0008343631,0.00039528703,0.00078528386,0.021365914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009457695,0.0015670643,0.0033882817,0.00010932452,0.0002656801,0.00004413054,0.016756257,0.00068916,0.0010469977,0.1357779,0.75063753,0.089623116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007446731,0.00009626124,0.0039548697,0.000071056886,0.00013353676,0.0000065257427,0.0014675236,0.000845335,0.00037829526,0.0015094499,0.98997474,0.00081771606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066998703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008558968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005646141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075218687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601986198","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1027","title":"Book Review: American Property: A History of How, Why and What We Own, by Stuart Banner","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Banner; Property (philosophy); History; American history; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Archaeology; Ancient history","score_opus":0.02436011751485694,"score_gpt":0.27630313042027443,"score_spread":0.2519430129054175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601986198","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009626193,0.7642794,0.000091772315,0.07737206,0.0002684171,0.00026112882,0.0000046920572,0.000020864905,0.15760541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23219605,0.6831433,0.00044934466,0.03147356,0.0007577786,0.00003880697,0.0000031778466,0.00002915415,0.05190883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885285,0.00018344488,0.00020552802,0.00011688854,0.0003357463,0.00030551915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913836,0.000037139765,0.00027305813,0.00014529731,0.000104443636,0.00030171318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007076609,0.000097080825,0.00022198203,0.000018940846,0.0003448344,0.00011384951,0.00020776788,0.000036894457,0.00048918196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036468446,0.00006460929,0.000074597694,0.00007880672,0.0005321709,0.001439011,0.00004181001,0.00021823672,0.0000151569675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036824617,0.00008300797,0.00009171186,0.000038439834,0.000018108321,6.963296e-7,0.002162544,6.94514e-8,0.0002391455,0.035578225,0.9475301,0.014254284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009265432,0.000034871988,0.000025935182,0.00022910278,0.000035493307,0.000012009686,0.0011328183,0.0000018943902,0.00002339668,0.00019572371,0.9981114,0.00010465864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010041839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005110172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23209979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019574392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109561086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603569638","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of Institutionalizing Petition System in China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; China; Consistency (knowledge bases); Heading (navigation); Political science; Law; Field (mathematics); Core (optical fiber); Mode (computer interface); Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.057924878724689266,"score_gpt":0.40729538353106737,"score_spread":0.3493705048063781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603569638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510981,0.00014877347,0.00019926789,0.00038688042,0.000023746836,0.00013238555,0.00001628562,0.000058983685,0.04793561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989814,0.000044376415,0.00054703857,0.000013223437,0.000026466329,0.000027582857,0.0002640513,0.0000024030767,0.00009346155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991463,0.00018801336,0.00024180837,0.00010711136,0.00021577107,0.000101033875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990207,0.00002779664,0.00013826997,0.00038185206,0.00036048266,0.00007089403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008325573,0.000051171137,0.00012236345,0.000093655595,0.00040899098,0.00015717887,0.0004123106,0.00005929592,0.000009597459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111218156,0.000046485075,0.000052963656,0.0008905659,0.0003709094,0.0008892546,0.000046003446,0.00008659216,0.000008403878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007788009,0.0000658605,0.047729578,0.000006937,0.000022108477,1.1753061e-7,0.010339011,0.006291537,0.00038243298,0.9346005,0.000019665484,0.00053450075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005228104,0.000028597478,0.8742612,0.00007166685,0.00015343369,7.798903e-7,0.03349517,0.020507641,0.0002246964,0.0013253101,0.06916191,0.0002467751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013015799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007491385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93327516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033727582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090374386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604176938","doi":"","title":"Beals v. Saldanha: The Great Canadian Comity Experiment Continues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Enforcement; Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Good faith; Business; Economics; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.014496831904277417,"score_gpt":0.2933244050015334,"score_spread":0.278827573097256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604176938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7390733,0.005469424,0.0014905052,0.13956589,0.0003947898,0.000656404,0.000012535428,0.00007663562,0.11326052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99429315,0.0014506293,0.000031760388,0.00047699,0.00047839925,0.0000141408045,0.0000011590583,0.0000079134,0.003245877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780107,0.00009246524,0.00015041938,0.00010922043,0.00023411593,0.0016126842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948096,0.000032749216,0.00007384373,0.00013690033,0.00006729381,0.00020823994],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015733602,0.00007839043,0.00008942874,0.00003395928,0.0019536286,0.00015484206,0.0004128404,0.000053191736,0.00007082781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051127907,0.000055620232,0.0000780807,0.00014532864,0.0001712691,0.00012262307,0.000018513072,0.00077946606,0.00006661481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023172288,0.000014642482,0.00050986727,2.1121832e-7,0.000025769556,0.0000010629961,0.002992011,0.000016221578,0.00005340607,0.99334025,0.0003906265,0.0026536088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003770714,0.00005372525,0.001323015,0.000007630037,0.000018776482,0.000034943576,0.016435726,0.0000014569976,0.00016445597,0.3766412,0.6048035,0.0001385128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40579158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9233229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61669904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025796008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00671907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604356878","doi":"","title":"A frolic in the law of tort: expanding the scope of employers' vicarious liability","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Liability; Context (archaeology); Law; Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Strict liability; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014139013442477866,"score_gpt":0.3149858926513315,"score_spread":0.3008468792088536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604356878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744096,0.001309357,0.00048803462,0.007477231,0.000037988884,0.00024168381,0.0000017752548,0.0000062763947,0.016028062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849206,0.0012020626,0.000025395748,0.00010961296,0.00010997673,0.00000828054,2.220711e-7,0.0000038193957,0.000048550188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854666,0.00016673043,0.00024540536,0.00008177987,0.000293315,0.0006660857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994941,0.000111489935,0.00014380514,0.00017110695,0.000053582124,0.000025944064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003329827,0.000053419917,0.000108247674,0.000023141822,0.0004095153,0.000031958567,0.00052650954,0.000039917493,0.000010823733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081661885,0.000030673742,0.00008467302,0.00030355004,0.00028814314,0.00009998397,0.00002514442,0.0006943615,0.0000024702565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072826306,0.000066252156,0.0012616726,0.0000016819905,0.000013132697,1.8733364e-7,0.010561256,0.000088372995,0.000224603,0.9867946,0.0000038752287,0.0009770708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005607486,0.00014009948,0.0051912474,0.000030482053,0.0000282345,0.000014600906,0.029770052,0.0000019634074,0.0005283567,0.954577,0.009066573,0.00009060336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015701799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099859424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08415762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042453196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017237981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1605576174","doi":"","title":"La Possibilité D'Une Contre-Théorie Du Contrat (The Possibility of a Counter-Theory of Contract)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.015251970928550396,"score_gpt":0.26250534818434257,"score_spread":0.24725337725579216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1605576174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9462614,0.014954649,0.0048553874,0.0063818023,0.00048224206,0.0006039302,0.00006927234,0.000019211055,0.026372088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916835,0.0048588505,0.000048345064,0.000115485156,0.0003781474,0.000011288896,0.0000015030508,0.000020399682,0.0028824813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950785,0.0013475738,0.0010056524,0.00029260817,0.0004989802,0.0017766576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968842,0.0009374494,0.0009850233,0.0004451126,0.00057686015,0.00017132901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011052126,0.0002418336,0.0005222981,0.000045215253,0.000505795,0.000048027443,0.0008587568,0.00025194284,0.0004550645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042367377,0.00017907699,0.00042172967,0.00047178793,0.0025357513,0.00036099408,0.00006259371,0.0019460579,0.00002133689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029624952,0.00069026666,0.0068069943,0.000023037874,0.0003347907,0.0000030538877,0.009368459,0.0000014286659,0.00045003765,0.9570695,0.000023411672,0.024932742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012566781,0.00046368016,0.011555531,0.00007277861,0.00029727854,0.00012830137,0.025200654,0.000038138183,0.0005488632,0.95367396,0.0065614935,0.00020265637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010805445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019947194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04542208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071102224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005091749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606528688","doi":"","title":"Johanna Wagner and the Rival Opera Houses","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Tort; Opera; Law; Private law; Relation (database); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Art; Sociology; Public law; Art history; Liability","score_opus":0.02174676871542213,"score_gpt":0.2733349761007105,"score_spread":0.25158820738528836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606528688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4132472,0.00042038667,0.0002665292,0.025503946,0.000029166256,0.00015322001,0.0000030243532,0.000036936275,0.5603396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781315,0.0016642018,0.00030830383,0.00006505439,0.000047261143,1.8961074e-7,4.8452426e-7,0.0000022971012,0.019780736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995984,0.000057514746,0.000026792903,0.00008860398,0.00011903502,0.00010964427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997106,0.000045297737,0.000034330184,0.00011631066,0.000037506892,0.00005595687],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001859348,0.000037723596,0.00007697771,0.000005329717,0.00060823106,0.000019052488,0.00021503067,0.000032981345,0.0037422187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014543132,0.000032597294,0.0000378047,0.00004083615,0.00050814747,0.00024244406,0.000079148114,0.000037751124,0.000015040541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001470799,0.00007866779,0.003483324,0.000007052077,0.00005032498,0.000006269042,0.23005895,0.000010664968,0.00016543166,0.70450383,0.0045701866,0.05691823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010699455,0.000024869114,0.16132392,0.0000063397665,0.000043454747,0.0000012015901,0.1151643,0.00013826687,0.0000067310866,0.00046341354,0.7216331,0.00012450315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5007024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29166055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7170629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049301463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036625246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1611832157","doi":"10.5040/9781474200790.ch-013","title":"North-West Transportation Co Ltd v Beatty (1887)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archaeology; Geography; History","score_opus":0.037660738208656744,"score_gpt":0.275766108398293,"score_spread":0.2381053701896363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1611832157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037995138,0.00003311261,0.0004359227,0.0022591124,0.00032827098,0.00047605517,0.00033694087,0.00031443156,0.9954362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1343053,0.000021417916,0.00020851598,0.0009093232,0.0016641533,0.000060374667,0.00092419394,0.000072649724,0.86183405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784225,0.000041530366,0.00044107914,0.0005122279,0.00075974496,0.00040314562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846846,0.00013731839,0.00034959425,0.00046535154,0.00028653684,0.0002927416],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069543,0.00028225593,0.00032460596,0.00012609741,0.00092457526,0.0017072228,0.0007408358,0.0005242141,0.0008117159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008709803,0.0002971674,0.00021904906,0.000032584445,0.0003150752,0.0005692659,0.000026736649,0.0007320171,0.00043828983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003820888,0.0000065096083,0.00015806117,0.000022038814,0.000025135063,0.0000044450226,0.0027061712,0.0000020855596,0.0000054066686,0.9447819,0.042768277,0.009516149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001248583,0.0000126947025,0.0010173537,0.00005586272,0.00005301774,5.165087e-7,0.000073027746,0.0000024504823,0.00001021686,0.0074800765,0.9908272,0.00034274042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024140775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049313437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9480589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015875473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040535684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1621013140","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495229.006","title":"Unfair competition and the doctrine of misappropriation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Tort; Law; Doctrine; Common law; Political science; Appropriation; Trespass","score_opus":0.02424036527417452,"score_gpt":0.21662950595030755,"score_spread":0.19238914067613302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1621013140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013602115,0.00008322491,0.00021048296,0.00033226903,0.000042634987,0.00043767155,0.0000826571,0.000034555265,0.9986405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037231296,0.00058066397,0.000038245238,0.000025741192,0.00010839302,8.152851e-7,0.000014303386,0.0000075296252,0.96199304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993625,0.00005539774,0.00011454711,0.00016810912,0.00020078331,0.00009862841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993232,0.00010155964,0.00019982808,0.0001993104,0.000120180266,0.000055916273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001815441,0.000100830715,0.0001753433,0.00004310288,0.00036654843,0.000026190002,0.0002252098,0.00014207156,0.000014997746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000111673035,0.00009113146,0.00008403776,0.000008579123,0.0008195822,0.000047751786,0.00010611977,0.00016885097,0.0000040563714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024631698,0.000004109207,8.3606125e-7,0.000018115203,0.000025059342,0.0000015941819,0.00042242647,8.1324333e-7,0.00000400557,0.99703693,0.0015473282,0.0009141755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005266485,0.0000072716866,0.000027389371,0.000027271879,0.00009539264,6.224273e-7,0.00013135652,0.00005056894,0.000020242182,0.00021293852,0.9987988,0.00010152871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015561506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032883312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99725145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006838638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043514203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3716233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16316014","doi":"","title":"Problem of Parallel Actions: The Softer Alternative?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Deference; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05119798218304313,"score_gpt":0.31209488357465887,"score_spread":0.26089690139161575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16316014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28784764,0.003777375,0.09158463,0.024071278,0.0004203384,0.0012301253,0.0000090786825,0.0001132373,0.5909463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929054,0.0025404887,0.00051099266,0.0000601783,0.00021606979,0.000015567308,2.1016325e-7,0.0000054188727,0.0037456865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987806,0.00008712455,0.00015156697,0.000071470815,0.00018739115,0.00072183914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996076,0.000033658034,0.00014315023,0.00009339137,0.00008247606,0.000039691815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012157374,0.000048826278,0.00006112393,0.000024829747,0.0005229238,0.000024014464,0.00036146943,0.000029422521,0.00012467479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020131676,0.00003158796,0.000069997164,0.00012535503,0.00015187984,0.00015629773,0.000022092523,0.00060109235,0.00002779848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000735985,0.000039913466,0.0006590484,5.7975814e-7,0.000035322188,1.18785906e-7,0.004683454,0.000005588123,0.000027695953,0.98587686,0.00006991207,0.008594125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001414773,0.00005401528,0.0008869499,0.0000052250266,0.000017758804,0.000013230899,0.008469457,0.000009020345,0.00005799484,0.8830888,0.107196584,0.000059464808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023996395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073656947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70505774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019595379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010528652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41102305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1632280653","doi":"10.3968/4392","title":"Protection of Farmers’ Interests in Rural Land Circulation of China: Theoretical Frame and Realization Mechanism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Circulation (fluid dynamics); Frame (networking); China; Business; Process (computing); Realization (probability); Protection mechanism; Revenue; Economic system; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Finance; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021407081230936237,"score_gpt":0.34289970254699054,"score_spread":0.3214926213160543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1632280653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915703,0.00003537488,0.0037142562,0.000788456,0.000020539432,0.0003334578,0.0000036552021,0.000024701318,0.003509253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994911,0.00011857421,0.00027439534,0.000011312625,0.000019280338,0.000027189768,0.00003514708,0.0000045924944,0.000018410425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917763,0.00023628761,0.00026250398,0.000092515606,0.00013875603,0.00009228347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993051,0.000059024238,0.00018962564,0.00022319923,0.00019337675,0.00002961954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006136652,0.00005988537,0.00011282396,0.000040889867,0.00023862156,0.00006776969,0.00018110093,0.000101576414,0.00001642559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031828738,0.000051897703,0.000027146276,0.00020249817,0.00063353736,0.00034094744,0.00006573218,0.00011475675,0.0000012227208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000140324155,0.000029927218,0.015052434,0.000017838933,0.0000029495866,6.9804593e-9,0.0057035894,0.000057314373,0.008485806,0.9662264,0.0000012196514,0.0044084867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072799413,0.00007888617,0.661545,0.00017426726,0.000018789664,0.0000014045813,0.0031495367,0.012606302,0.0032669944,0.31698197,0.0012517349,0.0001971039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036982053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010387455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6492444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048054444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016352311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55906045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W164522872","doi":"","title":"Laying Bare an Ethical Thread: From IP to Property to Private Law?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Teleology; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Private property; Tangible property; Political science; Law; Sociology; Intangible property","score_opus":0.03514848090773142,"score_gpt":0.34623466394380603,"score_spread":0.3110861830360746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W164522872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9235726,0.00031511424,0.0081461435,0.05333058,0.00022665712,0.0004314314,0.000009635225,0.00009191628,0.013875938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931746,0.00011776494,0.0010222261,0.003085285,0.0016316839,0.000022570675,0.0000029808114,0.000017714174,0.00092513446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969658,0.00018618781,0.00019154102,0.00018408113,0.00039679767,0.0020755746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907,0.000044988206,0.000037996804,0.00019096286,0.00007977114,0.00057630264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002373922,0.00010562047,0.00012706875,0.00003523709,0.0010626421,0.00017176103,0.0004892475,0.00014824147,0.00012236842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121329125,0.000073954696,0.00005926652,0.00022865456,0.000053627246,0.0003636132,0.00008022075,0.0017975483,0.00029732852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014047059,0.000052569612,0.0021454853,5.5961345e-7,0.000018718212,3.0932492e-7,0.0058123656,0.000011468511,0.00081538345,0.9837687,0.00014772845,0.0072126673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018830324,0.00014599878,0.0028348183,0.00001898737,0.00002356512,0.000009477558,0.009025315,0.0000061506053,0.00019131032,0.145087,0.84219694,0.00027213164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005698456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019424053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8420492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007233969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008969567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1659383018","doi":"","title":"Property (Greek and Roman)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Connotation; Object (grammar); Property (philosophy); Term (time); Terminology; Power (physics); Law and economics; Symbol (formal); Law; The Thing; Ancient Greek; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02944712102856449,"score_gpt":0.27050436546833206,"score_spread":0.24105724443976756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1659383018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4195567,0.0020436025,0.003048899,0.0061633475,0.0001503986,0.00030171633,0.0000011451746,0.000085846004,0.56864834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836048,0.0024623226,0.00015808012,0.00008077867,0.00019726723,0.0000044485782,1.793268e-7,0.000005675693,0.013486485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871427,0.000049127902,0.000092653696,0.00008916093,0.00012853222,0.0009262782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975246,0.00000938258,0.00004823016,0.00006342741,0.000038259746,0.00008821227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096122565,0.00004800249,0.000055380973,0.0000224449,0.00059230573,0.00004451849,0.00016571992,0.000035232486,0.000105595274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002724539,0.000031443433,0.00002877203,0.0000844734,0.000104214305,0.00017043084,0.000022197206,0.00051667314,0.000043797685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052773557,0.000026022497,0.0020200305,5.952084e-7,0.000015598036,0.000001132713,0.003278432,6.5061656e-8,0.000029099,0.9680523,0.00010907438,0.026462356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024919014,0.00012999581,0.0038481266,0.0000059711,0.000020645484,0.00009830527,0.009537328,0.000012126975,0.000021444144,0.6795695,0.30636045,0.00014694744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002338871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01116986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56404805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018050444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010132042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6233044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662631561","doi":"10.3968/5154","title":"Study on the Meaning of Lex Voluntatisin the Choice of Law in International Private Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Law; Meaning (existential); Value (mathematics); Conflict of laws; Point (geometry); Position (finance); Attribution; Private law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05686507947549736,"score_gpt":0.3980816612678982,"score_spread":0.34121658179240083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662631561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51092076,0.0000031954364,0.0000063866573,0.0050476254,0.00025751686,0.0002251439,0.000002064482,0.0000045217885,0.4835328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867344,0.0000011173555,0.00006811988,0.00035380456,0.0001643172,0.00002659093,4.4538666e-7,0.0000025195673,0.000709626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882054,0.00013860546,0.00021865436,0.00012869337,0.00058234524,0.00011115781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991135,0.00027867316,0.00023581473,0.0001462881,0.00020302885,0.000022671129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014726153,0.000043634027,0.00007957225,0.000034890694,0.0004898032,0.000037620026,0.00076745474,0.000021049469,0.000089111476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012592653,0.000029298348,0.000026494961,0.00055582274,0.0014212534,0.00016567035,0.000062728315,0.00007657355,0.0000038476433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015078881,0.00019337545,0.0048477296,0.0000013162776,0.0000021955825,3.155802e-9,0.026269982,0.000004066063,0.0012030792,0.96714884,0.000054248758,0.00027362804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014228106,0.000040780404,0.8246776,0.00002191043,0.000007785985,2.276033e-8,0.0124592995,0.000008497543,0.0015782994,0.030203136,0.13078937,0.000071049726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011079389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086294604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93694574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007236395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019295569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W166531706","doi":"","title":"Privacy, Trusts and Cross-Border Transfers of Personal Information: The Quebec Perspective in the Canadian Context","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; Business; Statute; Context (archaeology); Data Protection Act 1998; Scope (computer science); Legislation; Order (exchange); Liability; Information privacy; Express trust; Freedom of information; Law; Political science; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.007725915589079477,"score_gpt":0.3252167629790057,"score_spread":0.3174908473899262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W166531706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88802296,0.0004913937,0.0005149455,0.06984219,0.000047736827,0.00031898348,0.0000075172234,0.000005678958,0.04074862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986954,0.00024173595,0.0000034703112,0.0005338709,0.00010097752,0.0000073188494,6.504228e-7,0.0000024393205,0.00041415443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878234,0.00014094228,0.00014603975,0.0000564424,0.00022756832,0.00064667413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996001,0.0000902639,0.000057301277,0.00006881436,0.0001236688,0.00005982087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022562412,0.00005495708,0.00006975237,0.000046984722,0.0009460716,0.00018769492,0.000263599,0.000045991685,0.00004069115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011125585,0.000033278448,0.000042817996,0.00018055312,0.00033505433,0.00031172342,0.0000066683747,0.00071455905,0.000003806367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005658684,0.000005607543,0.0016408991,7.488009e-7,0.000010803823,5.227524e-8,0.084565446,0.000004482511,9.3996425e-7,0.90068096,0.000022382568,0.013062002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008540578,0.00013041832,0.06503982,0.000011275778,0.000022904744,0.000049664715,0.4408099,0.0001735269,0.0000046611062,0.11619409,0.3765507,0.0001589646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7590919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99352056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7844869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080995966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045577385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80852324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16671126","doi":"10.29173/alr123","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Grand Council of the Crees","funders":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","keywords":"Freehold; Law; Energy law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Environmental law; Economics","score_opus":0.16396172225428923,"score_gpt":0.34957115516568765,"score_spread":0.18560943291139842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16671126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017963436,0.00525205,0.000035037043,0.0057023023,0.00014927752,0.00033469722,0.0000027359063,0.000014354098,0.98671323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8817612,0.09892772,0.0011813773,0.014305235,0.00010794382,0.00013913651,0.000009761136,0.00001661615,0.0035510424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992951,0.00006277347,0.00024444857,0.00013611717,0.000102918704,0.00015859836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950755,0.000046284225,0.00007997422,0.0001666866,0.00007787619,0.00012164444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022296795,0.000063337895,0.00016766934,0.000011435791,0.00012771525,0.0000073859405,0.00028776738,0.000029665194,0.00090560684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011302135,0.00005542753,0.00004613849,0.00025364285,0.00008355595,0.00006189106,0.000071137234,0.000033596494,0.00019161822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014230469,0.000030861815,0.000068994435,0.00003440707,0.000009227068,1.8116364e-7,0.0008335015,1.0636693e-8,0.0000061928445,0.951574,0.0028966223,0.044544566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028014507,0.000009959866,0.00013632247,0.00039191364,0.0000158951,1.7075027e-7,0.000027798867,5.5563195e-8,0.00015483706,0.0009616537,0.99820244,0.000070924325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070582986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1880718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99530584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035389246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008610646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1678082181","doi":"10.1002/iir.1201","title":"A Comparative Analysis of Anglo‐Australian Pre‐packs: Can the Means Be Made to Justify the Ends?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Administration (probate law); Balance (ability); Work (physics); Business; Business practice; Law; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Finance; Business administration; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.1406550897992904,"score_gpt":0.4496114111496491,"score_spread":0.30895632135035866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1678082181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050647005,0.021983761,0.0005733206,0.7277502,0.0008414446,0.0026039756,0.0008413097,0.000067263,0.19469176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892569,0.0040413705,0.00016497425,0.0031908765,0.00023103197,0.00016105126,0.000029709157,0.0000035985527,0.00292044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986753,0.00018307762,0.00033597226,0.00013305843,0.00047203482,0.00020057129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999029,0.00018956602,0.00019508981,0.00028054925,0.00020540108,0.00010040099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089267525,0.00009157042,0.0002406151,0.000057592442,0.00025459967,0.00004257983,0.00082350126,0.000029617313,0.00085306354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016771417,0.000053004336,0.00022463934,0.0010044522,0.00017403331,0.00013441003,0.0000783403,0.00012756787,0.00004037703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005087438,0.00020270841,0.005512867,0.00006533199,0.0010285709,2.941878e-7,0.03616914,0.00015222757,0.00011522097,0.9145708,0.03861552,0.003562196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024304314,0.000006957007,0.02670379,0.00013013632,0.00047225674,4.102629e-7,0.0012224795,0.000032698037,0.000037764912,0.00012201738,0.97117615,0.00007102954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035078963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004901752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93860996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093754046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070757145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9340448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1678126139","doi":"","title":"The Principle of Open Justice: A Comparative Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Constitution; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Economic Justice; Publicity; Comparative law; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.043745988407081576,"score_gpt":0.42472745334255313,"score_spread":0.3809814649354716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1678126139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31056598,0.0077777905,0.0052219434,0.074636325,0.00025064545,0.0014286683,0.000011664317,0.00004933291,0.60005766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98834515,0.0024303747,0.00016562248,0.000060168666,0.00041675963,0.000012910437,2.6859394e-7,0.0000046573805,0.008564118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983713,0.00014246852,0.00018608003,0.00010363269,0.00024578825,0.00095070346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923795,0.0001350246,0.00018314277,0.00012654907,0.0002513063,0.000066022956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022236716,0.000061114835,0.000108593755,0.000020849195,0.0017167206,0.00017798883,0.0008993348,0.000030178453,0.000035910405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010413936,0.000041941425,0.000059959657,0.00020846524,0.00022818132,0.00028073892,0.000099549776,0.0007210794,0.00003343581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017490433,0.000044322274,0.000050593408,3.4539048e-7,0.00004226847,6.075278e-8,0.0056775953,0.000043746728,0.00003363493,0.9921491,0.00015682298,0.001784009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028585937,0.00006960509,0.00030771006,0.0000048781644,0.000040247047,0.00000876334,0.09641707,0.00008244537,0.00006804715,0.3189257,0.58370996,0.00007968527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009922615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033038884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67777914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011696169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036068498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1684343192","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Materiality Requirement for Non-Disclosure and Misrepresentation in Insurance Contracts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Business; Duty; Scope (computer science); Equity (law); Materiality (auditing); Actuarial science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.044662862675167635,"score_gpt":0.33050893526195274,"score_spread":0.2858460725867851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1684343192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99261457,0.0000318787,0.000056835095,0.0020762319,0.00016006113,0.0004027648,0.0000030529952,0.00001217803,0.0046424144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804455,0.00007536499,0.00022897363,0.0000044276435,0.000186484,0.0000031138331,0.0000027424207,0.0000035120686,0.0014508151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989454,0.0002796673,0.00009000325,0.00018755213,0.00030160585,0.00019574615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990503,0.00045498172,0.00007736275,0.000121879886,0.00021659755,0.00007886327],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022757873,0.000044583285,0.00009025927,0.000043876847,0.0017728674,0.00011403115,0.00017584818,0.00008642067,0.000011432808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027779315,0.00004342305,0.000020034458,0.00015048322,0.0005024507,0.00020883756,0.00007601037,0.00042354624,8.451009e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044540266,0.00015802156,0.5645199,0.00015719088,0.000044108758,0.0000135169685,0.15757672,0.000026977876,0.22627406,0.04568353,0.00047292456,0.0046276664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010569762,0.0001593606,0.81212175,0.00006937965,0.000010304044,0.0000023528191,0.022863906,0.0004287187,0.0008843242,0.00703925,0.15521604,0.0001476183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009313261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047102193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2476019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003678755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010179288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1689194842","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1059","title":"Enforcing the Charter: The Supervisory Role of Superior Courts and the Responsibility of Legislatures for Remedial Systems","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Remedial education; Jurisdiction; Culpability; Legislature; Parallels; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Deference; Separation of powers; Equity (law); Luck; Supreme Court Decisions; Economics","score_opus":0.03332838234055772,"score_gpt":0.3061565351946295,"score_spread":0.27282815285407175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689194842","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16347112,0.65017617,0.00028446843,0.13650644,0.0007362243,0.017297748,0.0002659535,0.00008772212,0.031174174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772829,0.021448266,0.000037820933,0.00067687174,0.00020519928,0.00025539007,0.000003186602,0.000008207447,0.000082195555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984211,0.0004133524,0.00044402492,0.00016908166,0.00035106717,0.00020141326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981955,0.00081013766,0.0001822738,0.0005437861,0.00022446996,0.00004377433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004794518,0.00010283193,0.0003493714,0.000008134813,0.00068942964,0.000050822175,0.00052113866,0.00005518529,0.000014713708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046782082,0.000046290876,0.00017942382,0.00012032105,0.0013016551,0.000108801156,0.00007136018,0.00013678984,0.0000016206296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033363835,0.000016053622,0.000046473157,0.00036184426,0.00002200548,5.157206e-8,0.005072911,0.000007582784,0.0002454763,0.99317783,0.00021471044,0.00080169673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004961172,0.000029385998,0.0002853786,0.00091682497,0.00015268911,0.0000022074996,0.001944661,0.000038636867,0.00016015692,0.013807633,0.9820763,0.00008999615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059998045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004025044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030243173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022623467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90699494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168998060","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Duties of Shareholders and Directors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Shareholder; Context (archaeology); Business; Confusion; Corporate law; Accounting; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.014315678831443952,"score_gpt":0.2813774816877637,"score_spread":0.26706180285631975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168998060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97419167,0.0030660972,0.0004515671,0.0055403626,0.00007148371,0.00009506693,0.000003448751,0.000024180641,0.0165561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442655,0.0046843723,0.000060043392,0.000039617542,0.00012990284,0.000002002337,5.2450247e-7,0.0000047730578,0.0006522015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893725,0.000031135958,0.00011713355,0.00007585415,0.0001582162,0.00068038184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997518,0.000024156685,0.00007220391,0.000054596738,0.000039185783,0.000058054164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007644894,0.00004736531,0.00007485047,0.000038007667,0.00038265766,0.000031552678,0.00013373556,0.000028785202,0.00002710964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004977886,0.000042236425,0.000041526742,0.00012278609,0.00014252569,0.0001399496,0.000018584988,0.00039192042,0.000003956366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031744812,0.000021802904,0.0015639472,0.0000017074551,0.00002139763,3.3486995e-7,0.0020202494,0.000019291767,0.000114997456,0.9912465,0.000025239631,0.004961306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044526177,0.00009484171,0.005364235,0.00002404668,0.000024549634,0.00003155422,0.02099352,0.0000018371458,0.00032232606,0.9395443,0.033011306,0.00014220497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022424667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01001184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051702235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029551846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015168226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5586842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1693191163","doi":"","title":"'Forms Liberate': Reclaiming the Legal Philosophy of Lon L. Fuller","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Legal realism; Philosophy of law; Subject (documents); Law; Legal profession; Legal formalism; Empirical legal studies; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Legal research; Legal pluralism; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Black letter law; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.005818866746776085,"score_gpt":0.19054454165030063,"score_spread":0.18472567490352454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1693191163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088155955,0.00019695172,0.0000034436327,0.010129501,0.00034645034,0.0002673286,0.0001683431,0.0000072710227,0.90072477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93747115,0.00028901527,0.00013522735,0.00045674923,0.00020441222,0.000018824487,0.000049867846,0.000019633793,0.061355095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976669,0.000050945662,0.00031222095,0.0002010814,0.0015319529,0.00023688063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999083,0.00020306055,0.00033412382,0.00021915745,0.0000016938807,0.00015896178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000025913416,0.00016373418,0.00022866287,0.00001767886,0.00067219435,0.000043012707,0.0004263696,0.00008131523,0.000087770546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006191738,0.00012598356,0.000049134604,0.00010173953,0.00015698704,0.0002803268,0.00005581731,0.00035369597,4.6166577e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001353085,0.000019875577,0.0003718642,0.0001353247,0.00005028706,0.0000050890685,0.0012334917,0.000006491637,0.0038045163,0.9851982,0.0007796958,0.008259859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023429315,0.000044491328,0.009621413,0.00024277167,0.000068523186,0.0000011281807,0.023395455,0.00010561715,0.038496614,0.020672215,0.90667605,0.00044142242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03154861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5106299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.964526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066474813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003290037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97490036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1706456921","doi":"10.21991/c92t0v","title":"A FLAWED SYNTHESIS OF THE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.04015784934388064,"score_gpt":0.27051136580826407,"score_spread":0.23035351646438343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1706456921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053176833,0.0001674994,0.012203467,0.007186514,0.0009951376,0.00067363627,0.00025621068,0.00012931228,0.97307056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972157,0.000025638816,0.0012447694,0.00078013976,0.00008579695,0.00012727677,0.000005259531,0.0000056034587,0.00050983333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982495,0.00010829452,0.00042072753,0.00028036768,0.00046822513,0.0004729138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987405,0.00018336352,0.00020541968,0.0004261981,0.00028488654,0.00015965608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003987882,0.00016374304,0.0002104268,0.00006148991,0.0025569405,0.000038624083,0.0006816386,0.00014940175,0.0005711759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046630797,0.00012857396,0.0002639378,0.0004381317,0.013949689,0.00039599068,0.0001821469,0.00017796391,0.00014137624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014088587,0.000108222805,0.005958565,0.0000064041064,0.000035937956,0.0000013136186,0.0004080609,0.000020239991,0.0001343678,0.99193484,0.000977725,0.0004002582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005389617,0.000020463265,0.001951439,0.00016658656,0.00012407037,0.000031950665,0.0064348285,0.00008163768,0.006571634,0.16270293,0.8209239,0.00045154218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035030248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034430232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001345895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015008913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1708764691","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah13191","title":"Obligation, Greek and Roman","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Obligation; Creditor; Duty; Law; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Debt; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.02414624708067148,"score_gpt":0.2641254399212029,"score_spread":0.23997919284053143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1708764691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45350692,0.004156939,0.000053189942,0.0011159213,0.00044030193,0.00014330541,0.000002345904,0.000025174497,0.5405559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879025,0.000488085,0.00017199438,0.0003142489,0.00032997565,0.000013818009,0.0000012236648,0.0000041986314,0.010773944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994346,0.000049736955,0.00010411411,0.00006753145,0.00018095266,0.00016304637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995997,0.00006406091,0.000072021656,0.00013850661,0.000037340636,0.00008836684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057759247,0.000040942796,0.000055462213,0.000022583707,0.00024781225,0.000003433728,0.00014425298,0.000025548605,0.00013143274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063472035,0.00003121326,0.000023089367,0.00008471322,0.0003943083,0.00014730681,0.000032265474,0.00005335423,0.000034636876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004014439,0.00011355597,0.015627485,0.000012593314,0.0000075940693,2.1766476e-7,0.10933952,0.0000020802813,0.00044105403,0.6916864,0.17677487,0.005990612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003545106,0.0000052593186,0.041723028,0.0000022352765,0.000008104385,3.3985455e-7,0.00088647084,0.000002745259,0.000006088489,0.00038106216,0.9569076,0.000041667026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000756556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021715117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78013265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012219112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010095959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19059965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1709175624","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790744.001","title":"Credits","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04394975531791668,"score_gpt":0.24002549708186208,"score_spread":0.1960757417639454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1709175624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003478041,0.000099940255,0.00008442388,0.00011427817,0.00017860504,0.000325146,0.0002037423,0.00017691324,0.99878216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013435351,0.00078752084,0.000058517875,0.00007002875,0.0005270029,6.9241594e-7,0.000024817777,0.000023235409,0.99716467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896836,0.000028589007,0.000108694134,0.00032505306,0.00032063812,0.00024866048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991045,0.00005438575,0.00013361081,0.00034521028,0.00014694569,0.0002153561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007746678,0.00017859502,0.00020273661,0.00007368241,0.0008713251,0.000038913964,0.0005583733,0.00033185634,0.000018347877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010499545,0.00022484954,0.000167242,0.000007956536,0.00055153854,0.00007769004,0.00020402553,0.00033068776,0.00008562834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055194305,0.0000037201899,4.863954e-7,0.000005501206,0.000023080336,0.00005572868,0.00024663942,3.4810708e-7,0.0000019712745,0.8011773,0.1978679,0.0006117646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013329955,0.000008203957,0.000008666175,0.000027232305,0.000052684736,0.0000022189124,0.00007071524,0.0000026959185,0.0000127561325,0.000013127686,0.9994218,0.00024664268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016544462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048073078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80155385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002246681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003162853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9169098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1712274727","doi":"","title":"Reforming Illegality in Private Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Academy of Law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Project commissioning; Private law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Injustice; Publishing; Law reform; Common law; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.054363251114998304,"score_gpt":0.37659171812389874,"score_spread":0.32222846700890045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1712274727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41869402,0.00026978186,0.00006808972,0.040418502,0.000074919866,0.00017411757,0.000004543218,0.0000368611,0.5402592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693257,0.0001069682,0.0009572864,0.0015505899,0.00033230073,9.151738e-7,5.09334e-7,0.000004617085,0.00011423474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986739,0.00010190416,0.00042468717,0.00012098844,0.000365886,0.000312612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994778,0.00003670429,0.00024443356,0.00006404414,0.00003469519,0.00014234633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015601371,0.00007712185,0.00016411504,0.00004212924,0.0008132613,0.00006072433,0.00034765186,0.00013534634,0.000049793754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004603648,0.00006746556,0.00008032604,0.00020723701,0.0003034632,0.0005079109,0.000026662727,0.00063094764,0.000005659115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006804518,0.00003969009,0.00025247916,0.000002227537,0.0000033591066,0.0000023017444,0.0019179442,0.00001263765,0.00080584135,0.99132776,0.000062722145,0.005566237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026399954,0.000023870529,0.004844458,0.000069979375,0.0000074676464,0.000015020405,0.0006157781,0.000008899703,0.0018935363,0.24043414,0.75170153,0.000121340425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016774442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008497368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75163877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001281094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050712628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62550306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171313090","doi":"10.29173/alr125","title":"The Jurisdiction of the Alberta Surface Rights Board Under Section 30 of the &lt;i&gt;Surface Rights Act&lt;/i&gt;","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Causation; Tort; Statutory law; Cause of action; Law; Section (typography); Action (physics); Jurisprudence; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Liability; Plaintiff","score_opus":0.022607606931141465,"score_gpt":0.27214265887854694,"score_spread":0.24953505194740547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171313090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1866304,0.0152659435,0.00002861708,0.012908026,0.0015335676,0.0026993633,0.000012752435,0.000039314433,0.780882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97562367,0.0077439095,0.000037913243,0.0004755756,0.00013273877,0.00003176972,0.0000022324455,0.000016989628,0.015935233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975686,0.0006655457,0.0005825495,0.000309933,0.0005416709,0.00033167124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736124,0.0006989619,0.0005934115,0.0010561043,0.0001993308,0.00009092293],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087312644,0.00020326527,0.00033765726,0.000007239881,0.0018517141,0.000039064194,0.0010519099,0.00014264438,0.00042472628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009347979,0.00009601364,0.0003611608,0.0005894523,0.00078479986,0.00022233832,0.00016195592,0.00022280644,0.00010219691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046080295,0.00007976313,0.0001436861,0.000079396814,0.00007142901,3.2274517e-8,0.0016509031,0.000015665712,0.0004762793,0.9930779,0.004242056,0.0001583114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010046436,0.00001615022,0.0025282402,0.00039188899,0.00019881252,0.0000011221568,0.000020529793,0.000015632817,0.0010209401,0.008773481,0.9867952,0.00013753751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12735479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.525575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98430437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009154161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017316318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1719221636","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564.011","title":"Public interest and private right","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Element (criminal law); Political science; Balance (ability); Declaration; Politics; Relation (database); Private law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Public opinion; Public interest; Law; Public law; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0681113602477066,"score_gpt":0.24023450843503993,"score_spread":0.17212314818733332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1719221636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025032248,0.00008769262,0.00013849969,0.00069580093,0.000105307314,0.0003439026,0.00010856782,0.00009630079,0.9981736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072980663,0.0002829214,0.00007390379,0.00018222955,0.00010992237,8.2422133e-7,0.000014966751,0.000020255526,0.9920169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905056,0.000048551312,0.00011440547,0.00035846807,0.00017069648,0.0002572992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991392,0.000047910406,0.00013596352,0.00030878076,0.00010774181,0.00026044308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014066756,0.00018689471,0.00020014316,0.00009172694,0.00065977935,0.00013692449,0.00041411555,0.00027848408,0.000022453198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015399703,0.00021357133,0.00009139989,0.000009786771,0.00061192364,0.00012239341,0.0002518759,0.00032275144,0.000019470355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035669486,0.0000049111773,0.000005079815,0.000012365456,0.000033816425,0.000024686691,0.000080160644,1.5198957e-8,0.000004544851,0.98109037,0.018155567,0.0005849354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001554123,0.000009010855,0.000012099211,0.000030923075,0.000053106945,0.0000020540476,0.00006119088,0.0000011974458,0.000013666628,0.00028858642,0.99912983,0.0002429238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008645636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98097426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016830796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113546994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87091863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1719263751","doi":"","title":"The Core Nature of Fiduciary Accountability","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Fiduciary; Framing (construction); Confusion; Jurisprudence; Perception; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Core (optical fiber); Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.012588863738747007,"score_gpt":0.33222104394314395,"score_spread":0.31963218020439693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1719263751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9041325,0.008299618,0.00039909163,0.03659271,0.0002540896,0.00028081116,0.0000046213913,0.000037745747,0.049998805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994642,0.0035327757,0.000019164265,0.00017273215,0.00033343738,0.0000013675665,5.116428e-7,0.0000025833588,0.00129542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985599,0.00005909863,0.00015607897,0.00008024673,0.00026465,0.00088003086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994917,0.000091677706,0.00011416955,0.00014377564,0.00011486214,0.000043806544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024959382,0.00004913325,0.00006846908,0.000013821452,0.00099513,0.00004793888,0.00041737023,0.00008466062,0.000016916882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013781126,0.00003216084,0.0000775818,0.00017795867,0.00012798348,0.000111989706,0.00001265065,0.0014782315,0.0000058110263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008448949,0.000026381675,0.00065425556,2.9563532e-7,0.000009443737,7.201071e-8,0.00047565336,0.000001988618,0.000088833,0.97215825,0.00026490373,0.026311459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089686895,0.0000522333,0.0070905527,0.0000032769597,0.000008855638,0.000007387039,0.005260999,0.0000059720983,0.00003272598,0.8538051,0.13359125,0.000051931864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028544126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007022099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13332635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037254972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002021503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7653836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172067189","doi":"","title":"Intuitive Fiduciaries: The Equitable Structure of Family Life","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Legislation; Law and economics; Conceptual framework; Liability; Legitimacy; Intervention (counseling); Business; Structuring; Set (abstract data type); Law; Function (biology); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01185523881386916,"score_gpt":0.2818768857508799,"score_spread":0.2700216469370107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172067189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8927326,0.005934468,0.008898183,0.0125405695,0.00025569863,0.00036571745,0.000032881147,0.000041763746,0.079198085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618906,0.00070428156,0.00003653071,0.00015637302,0.0006767318,0.000002259142,0.0000018936213,0.0000067606447,0.0022261192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810904,0.00009414675,0.0001988547,0.00009198958,0.00029211806,0.0012138537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946827,0.000084738334,0.00016049511,0.000112478774,0.00012904056,0.00004498158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010249952,0.00006756526,0.00010034102,0.000027516411,0.000961602,0.00007556368,0.00038570174,0.000057552683,0.000061118546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009910246,0.000045546734,0.000070123875,0.0002500735,0.0002120262,0.00014295946,0.000039486953,0.00080705865,0.0000075015287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005082215,0.000015403171,0.00030122377,8.35944e-7,0.000023015466,9.726837e-8,0.0008331022,0.000075488926,0.0008473354,0.99600667,0.0006254112,0.0012663581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001643031,0.000044687913,0.0015842923,0.000005356012,0.0000233818,0.0000050192925,0.019576918,0.000010608511,0.00016308732,0.89261526,0.08572507,0.000082021106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066813612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021408947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103456415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003383632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035675562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1722070985","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2456792","title":"Deliberate Disregard: Judicial Appointments Under the Harper Government","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009717952048080665,"score_gpt":0.2699948639233722,"score_spread":0.2602769118752915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1722070985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5179442,0.0012256259,0.101723604,0.12700355,0.0010282052,0.00082417025,0.000011629819,0.00012913413,0.25010988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878809,0.0009032733,0.00003313505,0.0010457234,0.0010093164,0.0000141516775,8.047812e-7,0.000011590341,0.009101091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759424,0.0001881208,0.00017369751,0.00013394926,0.00057717005,0.0013327997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995384,0.00006493208,0.00011135286,0.00014714479,0.000043770146,0.00009435263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002309452,0.00008935554,0.00008798911,0.000010566592,0.00147456,0.0001680918,0.00040074563,0.000046597444,0.00009173045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043588956,0.000059137536,0.00008881883,0.00011646182,0.0001280022,0.0001378489,0.000045987337,0.00079618255,0.0001273248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070125134,0.000032392247,0.00017884876,2.9065353e-7,0.000039968705,9.914237e-8,0.00044242505,0.000039193186,0.000044628403,0.98380566,0.0005961016,0.0148134045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032590638,0.00006445484,0.00091854983,0.0000045828,0.000033058495,0.000009728351,0.006311525,0.00009420105,0.000026726799,0.51494217,0.47714722,0.00012189988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005686361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008210062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47655112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010971787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008931817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172429429","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2620","title":"Book Notes: Corrective Justice, by Ernest J. Weinrib","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.014715768746560902,"score_gpt":0.2884504512369562,"score_spread":0.2737346824903953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172429429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00073935627,0.0014772116,0.0032287142,0.012141431,0.00049841695,0.00028116416,0.000015899373,0.000067510264,0.9815503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821777,0.00055547885,0.00051489694,0.0034203737,0.00088386104,0.000035039087,0.0000039040237,0.00001738363,0.012391412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987064,0.00011329194,0.00023127485,0.00017377807,0.00037251157,0.00040276162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893427,0.00018041025,0.00015974048,0.00014668738,0.00022938059,0.00034949326],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032993473,0.00011482456,0.00013618846,0.00002236571,0.0019727072,0.00045540012,0.00037944329,0.000100535726,0.0032987662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010539763,0.00010114008,0.000089763904,0.00012611323,0.00024812826,0.00065251987,0.000044828535,0.00039515606,0.0012565654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004104985,0.000111243164,0.0001843414,0.000004467722,0.000023666424,0.000004461488,0.0017815264,0.00001919501,0.00034614714,0.7534891,0.24066181,0.0033699635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023532056,0.000031771506,0.0002864621,0.00001950576,0.000044878452,0.000019377916,0.0016639177,0.00009912539,0.00015427408,0.024880629,0.97238487,0.00017988501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037794627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014281119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011572191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1728786440","doi":"","title":"Washington Trust Laws' Extreme Makeover: Blending with the Uniform Trust Code and Taking Reform Further with Innovations in Notice, Situs, and Representation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Lawrence College","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Statute; Code (set theory); Law; Representation (politics); Political science; Uniform Commercial Code; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021296405010020093,"score_gpt":0.2750282735567664,"score_spread":0.2537318685467463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1728786440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9653995,0.00017727893,0.0015630656,0.017035935,0.000015410846,0.00034000707,0.0000017810424,0.000020234571,0.015446771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974784,0.0007257245,0.00024488205,0.00011536009,0.000116633884,0.000024886218,0.000002427523,0.000013600359,0.0012780748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985579,0.00005413275,0.00017992173,0.00016661931,0.00025622305,0.0007851869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994526,0.00005453698,0.00022281219,0.000115699186,0.000099489975,0.000054867807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010241239,0.00009970289,0.000102915656,0.000083841536,0.0008961024,0.00031231454,0.00015434464,0.00004966932,0.000030769832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029063773,0.000060466908,0.000013563739,0.00052038574,0.00018242886,0.00070935895,0.000030027864,0.0007773795,0.000002819783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033678796,0.000032734333,0.052976683,0.0000044438443,0.000047276844,0.0000011898494,0.008439811,0.00007036111,0.0002347575,0.9235921,0.000018083567,0.014548898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004454565,0.00065238145,0.2670377,0.00023478184,0.00018765646,0.00041626592,0.5003549,0.0034235343,0.0001754488,0.18638195,0.035651058,0.0010298215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069306977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1113347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73721015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060248305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053751585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174363214","doi":"10.29173/alr312","title":"Gain-Based Remedies for Knowing Assistance: Ensuring Assistants do not Profit From Their Wrongs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Wrongdoing; Profit (economics); Law and economics; Action (physics); Business; Public relations; Law; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07643024645626567,"score_gpt":0.33319789152783846,"score_spread":0.2567676450715728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174363214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124786146,0.22646202,0.0020994442,0.09321177,0.0013349329,0.010857038,0.000509718,0.00053991383,0.54019904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751897,0.016210075,0.001408714,0.0037751538,0.00034817774,0.0005691586,0.000043708984,0.00003158575,0.0024237533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984264,0.00011836117,0.00039565272,0.00038016096,0.000296179,0.00038326855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809456,0.0010391814,0.0001864537,0.00040464877,0.0001378471,0.00013729765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005610286,0.00017327367,0.00039500385,0.000013505812,0.0012012508,0.000064851854,0.00038237905,0.00007802967,0.00022290974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044466832,0.0001411544,0.00022181935,0.00022388555,0.0002574045,0.00016070044,0.00003887637,0.00012064645,0.00007378653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042645912,0.00016592535,0.0068111285,0.0018565091,0.00016482403,0.000007166016,0.0046564634,0.0000066345488,0.0006762739,0.94344276,0.018130414,0.024039233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019280639,0.00000972615,0.0009496877,0.0018273124,0.000053337513,2.6831688e-7,0.00010447314,0.00002252207,0.00047199122,0.00051907473,0.99563146,0.00021736215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010029424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01594537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97750103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108958026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000194956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1746332038","doi":"","title":"The Theoretical Analysis on “Same right & Same price”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalization; Property rights; Urbanization; Government (linguistics); Land development; China; Land law; Property (philosophy); Economics; Land use; Business; Law and economics; Private property; Distribution (mathematics); Market economy; Economic system; Public economics; Land tenure; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Political science; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.02188956249395194,"score_gpt":0.3172197249538173,"score_spread":0.2953301624598653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1746332038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022827014,0.000021825166,0.00006593689,0.042066995,0.00019915217,0.00017356855,0.000020768473,0.000034250108,0.9345905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957001,0.0000064937617,0.000036713398,0.0016941443,0.0003711492,0.000016990556,0.0000013626131,0.000003690688,0.0021693099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810785,0.000103804574,0.000118572956,0.00026348204,0.0007237525,0.00068253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833715,0.00012928026,0.0000477357,0.00021632346,0.00021911785,0.0010503759],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002203342,0.00007154247,0.00009820307,0.0001223527,0.0046441862,0.00047052794,0.0009985798,0.00006413509,0.00018493009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005923717,0.000051598417,0.000080303435,0.0031674383,0.0044356696,0.00015021,0.000039923445,0.00014389316,0.00019765321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.764905e-7,0.0000049966334,0.00075010455,9.7733086e-8,0.000007164793,0.00000127348,0.0046248883,0.0000018089669,0.0000031630493,0.9909978,0.0021280013,0.0014797229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050701823,0.000011719505,0.0037920095,9.651262e-7,0.000030578714,1.2145401e-7,0.008118293,0.000117365795,0.000011732963,0.04885855,0.9388797,0.00012825237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0665154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2994438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97287315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009972142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002602487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1748802867","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Law and the Justiciability of Prerogative Powers: A Comment on Black V. Chrétien","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Prerogative; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.017137650876628403,"score_gpt":0.28750455641130995,"score_spread":0.27036690553468157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1748802867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48075816,0.0029103737,0.00047759584,0.26240304,0.00012520784,0.0010737701,0.0000140828,0.000017710307,0.25222003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647737,0.0026324056,0.000007973885,0.00044103785,0.000064284926,0.0000049263012,1.01854084e-7,0.0000026798066,0.000369229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998853,0.00020737654,0.0001765633,0.00006559811,0.00022543405,0.000472013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991649,0.00041897583,0.00016694408,0.00012133469,0.00009658265,0.00003129606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00219617,0.000046928228,0.00009349755,0.000008154826,0.0006255012,0.000028529237,0.00023812438,0.000024600082,0.000019968738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015068853,0.000024589275,0.000056976696,0.00007981868,0.0011564444,0.000048976508,0.000028554985,0.00042429927,0.00000313737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002419876,0.00005161009,0.000035105688,0.0000014494296,0.00003118786,1.8444648e-8,0.009969912,0.000010634263,0.000007675776,0.988625,0.00010590432,0.0011373255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012607768,0.0003405652,0.0003687582,0.000023642478,0.00007070422,0.000002747825,0.045839917,0.00032154395,0.00020134533,0.769454,0.18202218,0.00009381964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011868591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002245949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5157192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018601169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018050105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4810913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1750822166","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2012.00888.x","title":"In Defence of Quasi‐Contract","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Liability; Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0988565991060648,"score_gpt":0.35926096953460457,"score_spread":0.26040437042853976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1750822166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014179807,0.08020692,0.0018852989,0.004516124,0.00007955287,0.0010832027,0.000010687599,0.000045678622,0.89799273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827794,0.0155623,0.00039188468,0.0010433975,0.000016875754,0.000030014793,3.7667107e-7,0.0000029655346,0.0001728318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994595,0.00006128343,0.00017483858,0.00009062975,0.00010365004,0.000110093795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969476,0.000024521083,0.00006380094,0.00014989523,0.000029473551,0.000037563237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042655572,0.000037283666,0.00013961016,0.000006521441,0.000054075135,0.0000041250755,0.00018453112,0.00002361456,0.0003269379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035147543,0.000032057073,0.000045552566,0.00011115162,0.00009629879,0.00012080125,0.000017849943,0.00004948809,0.000056704146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.119809e-7,0.000055647968,0.00022016106,0.00011775845,0.0000012913987,6.071926e-7,0.0014788155,9.211853e-8,0.000016214428,0.9911881,0.000057678302,0.0068631414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008516882,0.000014356386,0.0012616713,0.0008970028,0.000020693678,5.0574624e-7,0.00003053539,0.000044337117,0.00010044982,0.068500005,0.92892414,0.000121141165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015812226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007787938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96859956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018403882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041026047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99074155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W175113025","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Duty of Departing Employees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.011863127333832255,"score_gpt":0.30858965599162286,"score_spread":0.2967265286577906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175113025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92609453,0.0036882968,0.0016760167,0.025269298,0.00012296626,0.00016839996,0.0000011339558,0.000043001754,0.04293635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518985,0.003094916,0.000042021733,0.000070614435,0.00032321413,0.0000015200922,2.0892358e-7,0.0000031892673,0.0012744544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998439,0.00008165664,0.00018468553,0.00006541112,0.00021595346,0.001013304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957037,0.00008601799,0.0001347271,0.00009439485,0.000067380504,0.000047098343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021684219,0.0000445519,0.00006375006,0.00001608755,0.001245412,0.000058122947,0.00031105042,0.000030297859,0.000008495544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014529265,0.000030497578,0.00007019294,0.00015139948,0.00008495058,0.000104496954,0.000011963534,0.00054922927,0.000008307435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045343836,0.000023353345,0.0007479144,2.1649804e-7,0.000011841762,1.6032648e-7,0.0006617526,0.000007793535,0.000153555,0.9499302,0.00012434546,0.04833434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001245803,0.000116255476,0.0038508135,0.000006673973,0.000014297737,0.000011212532,0.006675932,0.000013480177,0.00017951174,0.88484013,0.10408669,0.00008043219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029675744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005985041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10396235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020797686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001370446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9578829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1752552782","doi":"10.5020/23172150.2012.132-141","title":"A estipulação em favor de terceiros revisitada. Doi: 10.5020/2317-2150.2006.v11n1p132","year":2010,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Pensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03851223489746663,"score_gpt":0.33638529081381,"score_spread":0.2978730559163434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1752552782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90186816,0.0042526503,0.0028809807,0.023300512,0.0010915714,0.0037377293,0.00090729084,0.0008503582,0.06111075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93278843,0.00091846485,0.0019366938,0.0028720323,0.0028064828,0.00022091066,0.000108307875,0.00018466814,0.05816398],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923513,0.0007193902,0.0014931184,0.0016046742,0.0013898065,0.0024416898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99401164,0.0006772361,0.0009042537,0.0020678695,0.00053333235,0.0018056623],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037084583,0.00094640016,0.001220177,0.00026206358,0.0032092228,0.0016050189,0.002374754,0.0010175271,0.00625976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002634808,0.0009712192,0.00083550625,0.0017010485,0.00089760957,0.00057319744,0.00082193146,0.0022885073,0.0046673906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036568695,0.002859333,0.02206302,0.0017932167,0.00071665435,0.0008443567,0.08064333,0.000054022516,0.019701641,0.3542344,0.42242137,0.09430297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006522243,0.0001334867,0.010227388,0.0003357691,0.00042306993,0.00009163685,0.002369821,0.000792703,0.00022118045,0.001209911,0.982275,0.0012677961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022116408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032723262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5598537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059234083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020705957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1762879018","doi":"","title":"The Reliance Interest in German Contract Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"German; Law; Conceptualization; Statutory law; Political science; Damages; Scholarship; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023205852548304137,"score_gpt":0.34285158392211823,"score_spread":0.3196457313738141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1762879018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8428525,0.0034079873,0.001801432,0.030594641,0.00031168698,0.00025967587,0.0000010231101,0.000040129584,0.12073093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943295,0.0030588468,0.000011291589,0.00023130859,0.000358244,0.000002545561,2.1720227e-7,0.000005385756,0.00200264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998096,0.00006094703,0.00019166448,0.000079214624,0.00012663074,0.0014455384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995645,0.00015119903,0.00008515892,0.00009383174,0.00004077331,0.00006453686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046212967,0.00004946314,0.00005665865,0.000021400865,0.00089122786,0.00010680724,0.00034143793,0.000042953783,0.000010903513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065275235,0.00003507243,0.000043506694,0.00016572152,0.00015781075,0.0001394736,0.00001629698,0.0011489632,0.00003888723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093901745,0.000015406462,0.00034643567,1.7630481e-7,0.000005637896,0.0000014951421,0.00050349976,8.5272575e-7,0.00007428366,0.9845103,0.00004026318,0.014492229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016959939,0.000024076893,0.0024156293,0.0000068849445,0.0000026938012,0.000015598005,0.0023156751,0.000006286244,0.000032618063,0.3517333,0.6432161,0.00006155194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034930068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5170744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64317584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067726127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007519887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6854694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1774663677","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005622","title":"Comparative History and the Internal View of French, German, and English Private Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"German; Law; Politics; Dialectic; Political science; Dualism; Legal science; Legal history; German idealism; Sociology; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020968831279057194,"score_gpt":0.28548350600428607,"score_spread":0.2645146747252289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1774663677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71792716,0.021493906,0.00014799727,0.0034938024,0.00044414873,0.00028656644,0.000025022384,0.0000072348284,0.25617418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870515,0.00018498716,0.00015839837,0.0003488985,0.000223176,0.0000017125344,2.7207685e-7,0.0000031627735,0.000374268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921393,0.000112046524,0.0002731838,0.00008037078,0.00016174681,0.00015872132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910116,0.00013227326,0.00024475387,0.00008914862,0.000203373,0.00022928826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005488342,0.000065632405,0.00019503504,0.000029473968,0.00027096784,0.000062428444,0.00028359602,0.000036303198,0.000054772896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029075058,0.00004891468,0.000043765776,0.00005959339,0.0020883433,0.00022333748,0.000018136394,0.00018063946,0.0000013557232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037739057,0.000005034299,0.00080971885,0.000006401623,0.00000982005,0.0000068107097,0.012432928,0.0000030111232,0.000027914983,0.98475426,0.0018118819,0.00012845219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026384098,0.000019485155,0.004909515,0.00007094802,0.00002248503,0.00001081153,0.00028558346,0.00000803886,0.000066437395,0.011800836,0.9824771,0.00006486388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23783188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4962216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98066527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013748487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043705569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7694587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177687042","doi":"10.29173/alr183","title":"The Problematic Revival of Murder Under Section 229(c) of the Criminal Code","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Conviction; Criminal code; Jurisprudence; Mens rea; Supreme court; Jury; Homicide; Political science; Recklessness; Accidental; Parliament; Pretext; Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology; Poison control; Medicine","score_opus":0.030181309641119345,"score_gpt":0.33755211983474503,"score_spread":0.30737081019362567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177687042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06275998,0.016375639,0.00009648497,0.16395544,0.0015732003,0.005264905,0.000014675544,0.000035559086,0.7499241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885028,0.0070969104,0.00007615008,0.0007973961,0.000103058905,0.000069564456,8.7823474e-7,0.000006730173,0.0033465018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991428,0.00014404645,0.00029477096,0.00009095375,0.0002127425,0.0001146792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889237,0.0003681279,0.00023037053,0.00037533825,0.00010366618,0.000030114785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073967903,0.000055764478,0.00015027919,0.0000033338117,0.0004222201,0.000017439615,0.0003656773,0.000037176276,0.00015037016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002734714,0.000028257195,0.000111999536,0.00019788535,0.00038555817,0.000057897516,0.000048442373,0.00014123497,0.000016328786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7362946e-7,0.000018726572,0.000041643103,0.00053919706,0.00000779211,6.734039e-9,0.0003766511,7.977406e-7,0.00026482655,0.99711734,0.0007873793,0.00084518717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036639296,0.0000061967976,0.00043121842,0.000630834,0.000104732644,0.0000010831291,0.0001013113,0.0000054977904,0.00010194965,0.007562198,0.9909725,0.000045831443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011631372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0876664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99018514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010579501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008872938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99495023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1778739224","doi":"","title":"The Donoghue Diaries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law; Commonwealth; Dozen; History; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007773237761991072,"score_gpt":0.26797457757147986,"score_spread":0.2602013398094888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1778739224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4231679,0.009521179,0.009167027,0.28177834,0.00082388584,0.0008912419,0.0000020625346,0.00017080508,0.27447754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975687,0.0069156736,0.000023870212,0.00013202654,0.00053041667,0.000021864491,2.2962723e-7,0.000005160363,0.01668375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982255,0.00007668986,0.00011103789,0.00006386951,0.0001810626,0.0013418199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958795,0.000106844396,0.000060781364,0.00009692096,0.000076895274,0.00007060895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013119144,0.000045853652,0.00004389416,0.000012327207,0.0024354928,0.00036072073,0.0003551059,0.000032363947,0.00010455824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008457886,0.000028493443,0.000051012557,0.00009481144,0.00018160834,0.00021139834,0.000023338469,0.00071972434,0.00041196955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.0969096e-7,0.0000060552147,0.0003633882,1.0746243e-7,0.00001235481,4.5676945e-8,0.00054215186,0.0000011571051,0.000016973832,0.9678123,0.0009453597,0.030299317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004194604,0.000011075624,0.00054193696,6.878986e-7,0.0000029947307,0.0000044543135,0.007040842,0.0000065787544,0.0000050174,0.56048137,0.43182722,0.000035886926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002952712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019997071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5525191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033460784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015791013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1785794553","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Duty and Members of Parliament","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Parliament; Duty; Law; Accountability; Political science; House of Commons; Politics; Commons; Prerogative; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04414369158671966,"score_gpt":0.30143395230978165,"score_spread":0.257290260723062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1785794553","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25773638,0.39025775,0.00001653116,0.08128873,0.00040873556,0.003366264,0.00037550254,0.000081653765,0.26646844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6884925,0.3003084,0.00035632096,0.009654145,0.000099629564,0.00006910291,0.000023693505,0.000010510002,0.000985716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991334,0.00007393703,0.00022192506,0.00016483864,0.00016101265,0.00024485437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992192,0.000031713233,0.000071232804,0.00019161052,0.000035553632,0.00045070995],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029993823,0.00007972372,0.00019963627,0.000036147445,0.00036481148,0.000008042076,0.00015920424,0.000032215008,0.0011987389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030158422,0.00007837391,0.00005563297,0.00019106943,0.00027433824,0.00009974641,0.000018457853,0.00006769816,0.000034221728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048609004,0.00011469626,0.072199084,0.0015813597,0.00015115018,0.00008458234,0.0077016186,0.000003990932,0.000035721892,0.054243676,0.7449736,0.11890563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005959844,0.000009495937,0.003168024,0.00029928042,0.000027624872,0.0000047757835,0.00041144274,0.0000015334444,0.000008551792,0.00011332444,0.99580103,0.000095301904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5793078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5387855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43075606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017756771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006066101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792010912","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000583x","title":"A Particle of Freedom: Natural Law Thought and the Kantian Theory of Transfer by Contract","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Doctrine; Philosophy; Freedom of contract; Epistemology; Social contract; Normative; Contract theory; Obligation; Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Natural (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.01669162336942738,"score_gpt":0.2765781785476249,"score_spread":0.25988655517819753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792010912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94988054,0.017581189,0.00026995825,0.0084117,0.0003092147,0.00025497732,0.000078506266,0.0000042448128,0.023209646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992254,0.00012050362,0.00007656088,0.0003288036,0.00013661392,0.0000018461475,2.8821822e-7,0.000004932106,0.00010508043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897695,0.00020449281,0.0002917861,0.00005571935,0.00020297326,0.00026811002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989635,0.00029500813,0.00012649466,0.000113154594,0.00013434817,0.00036754116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014970254,0.000062618805,0.00018158887,0.000015294108,0.00030389268,0.00003986461,0.00031885126,0.00004614085,0.000080599566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077825076,0.000042147785,0.000083793224,0.0001143755,0.001839633,0.00035504074,0.0000067816873,0.00017940452,0.0000012380929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023824095,0.000012347469,0.0013176356,0.0000049106925,0.00002289872,0.0000013989882,0.008992456,0.0000021129579,0.0007802143,0.98830336,0.00016441087,0.00037441737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028696493,0.00013796383,0.0126990145,0.00023515885,0.00034438734,0.000064691405,0.0070860875,0.000060700444,0.018986879,0.022663621,0.9344342,0.00041768825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06503135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1521988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96563977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028237986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029442128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9411947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179692219","doi":"","title":"The Corporation, Directed And Produced","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.01321939642426303,"score_gpt":0.23434022043415076,"score_spread":0.22112082400988772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179692219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96328974,0.00013107638,0.0008774279,0.0037110045,0.00006346549,0.00020606244,0.000009919636,0.00008734593,0.031623952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989603,0.00004896826,0.00027956962,0.000015178411,0.00009171073,4.851939e-7,0.000009311523,0.000003513147,0.009948254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937886,0.000068966954,0.000073369294,0.0001471265,0.00018433131,0.00014736685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994398,0.00009488292,0.000109148874,0.00015265676,0.0001545608,0.000048995953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031647924,0.00005247208,0.00007522229,0.00002632427,0.0019569146,0.000086280415,0.00019589713,0.000045725003,0.00003369906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053601212,0.00005135189,0.00003606673,0.00025905663,0.0005893768,0.00021736659,0.000050043192,0.000061599705,0.000019755002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056758154,0.000018360792,0.006284344,0.0000024905146,0.0000073486526,4.3832608e-7,0.0016103303,0.0000054894645,0.000024837847,0.9895975,0.0023838726,0.000059308113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012488186,0.0000075042335,0.016898774,0.0000018919645,0.000013958656,3.1827744e-7,0.004378205,0.00004113565,0.0000012151976,0.9097747,0.06869444,0.000062938125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011326338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034890186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07982277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046879417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008962881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798224845","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1417","title":"Civil Disobedience and the Law: The Role of Legal Professionals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.011053417162402088,"score_gpt":0.28739608919688375,"score_spread":0.27634267203448165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798224845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005280361,0.0011311504,0.00008208963,0.01120646,0.00010545048,0.0001707031,0.000003863691,0.00000725679,0.9820127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998064,0.00018901163,0.00013357353,0.0005189949,0.00015566293,0.000013329504,1.6811846e-7,0.0000043217688,0.0009209454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988495,0.00034588948,0.0001862442,0.0000860288,0.00033989837,0.00019244474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930155,0.00024687411,0.00014924644,0.00013240856,0.00008556672,0.000084372754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016526312,0.00005938625,0.00009795872,0.000006638833,0.002316994,0.00015051814,0.00032538633,0.000036304595,0.00013798081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010194827,0.000028556662,0.00006229177,0.00009020742,0.0009996608,0.00020863321,0.000044636658,0.00026557845,0.0000065028153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006010506,0.00002994006,0.00015729366,0.0000010589505,0.0000075957314,4.1902777e-7,0.0026001509,0.0000039176225,0.00006896263,0.9966403,0.00012589639,0.00035840902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003026213,0.000009624357,0.00019596897,0.000019714369,0.000016294714,0.000020787533,0.007522594,0.000023539043,0.00026511273,0.5014176,0.4901495,0.00005669393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021068567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118520275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015498515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099843906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1798359168","doi":"","title":"The Liability Immunity Scheme in the Administrative Accountability System of China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Principle of legality; Liability; Punishment (psychology); Government (linguistics); Function (biology); Business; Good faith; Sovereign immunity; Law and economics; Construct (python library); Law; Public administration; Political science; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.07035035866987117,"score_gpt":0.3696268352917677,"score_spread":0.29927647662189655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1798359168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5388375,0.000031351912,0.000004048222,0.0049394043,0.00010584445,0.00036713036,0.000028967856,0.000009793517,0.455676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971676,0.000001802696,0.000024631701,0.00007368985,0.00008842642,0.000033445165,5.845014e-7,0.0000015755195,0.00005910741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984092,0.00033746878,0.00017968961,0.00016076004,0.00052618445,0.00038669756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897903,0.00016533279,0.00007656852,0.00028310376,0.00025082935,0.00024516098],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008043538,0.000055580324,0.00008539798,0.000027712205,0.0026660885,0.00017697096,0.001350563,0.000050012917,0.000006745769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009542171,0.000036039968,0.000035699162,0.001384393,0.003624089,0.00022925035,0.000045581655,0.00018358498,0.000006973903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026859188,0.00001513934,0.02056631,0.0000029895252,8.3765406e-7,3.705484e-7,0.05902406,2.2926999e-7,0.000016171953,0.91842115,0.00021438906,0.0017356693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012223904,0.000026795597,0.24149656,0.000008055469,0.000004160629,4.8959254e-7,0.51080775,0.000046525463,0.000035434332,0.00638951,0.24092448,0.00013798328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4711658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67388886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91203165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001250316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054475856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1821142045","doi":"","title":"Unwritten Constitutionalism in Canada: Where Do Things Stand","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Extraterritoriality; Political science; Constitution; Secession; Democracy; Supreme court; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Politics; History","score_opus":0.01843114013165977,"score_gpt":0.27637092386779094,"score_spread":0.2579397837361312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1821142045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089263305,0.00032297007,0.00027627157,0.031182501,0.000060065948,0.00013132443,0.0000071179757,0.000025226245,0.8787312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99287295,0.00019229387,0.0001552782,0.00058133836,0.000056797144,0.000007690884,8.82438e-7,0.0000015970292,0.0061311726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999459,0.000019921194,0.000088794295,0.000091830836,0.0001900448,0.00015037053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997835,0.000041803014,0.000017315715,0.00006475006,0.000025205867,0.00006738975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016071943,0.000033819782,0.000048814323,0.000013157387,0.0002190022,0.000038550388,0.00011823697,0.000023657049,0.0007916604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022754864,0.000030276622,0.000010687703,0.00017629264,0.000087218694,0.00014174845,0.000016623195,0.00006231278,0.00002026318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.435599e-7,0.000006834143,0.023868445,6.995822e-7,0.0000013892619,0.000005827629,0.00060563226,0.000008734599,0.000004382788,0.9665882,0.008180891,0.00072809396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084712854,8.5469526e-7,0.007554298,0.0000057922157,0.0000010473345,7.330728e-7,0.004279931,0.00001946605,0.000002324802,0.0047210297,0.98327696,0.000052857005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9937651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97509605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004114038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024218692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86681265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1823028455","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.020","title":"Trust law as fiduciary governance plus asset partitioning","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Corporate governance; Asset (computer security); Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.02933226815802039,"score_gpt":0.24074503718873674,"score_spread":0.21141276903071635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1823028455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014961479,0.000097978096,0.0000671054,0.00028453776,0.00017704137,0.0004924969,0.000364685,0.0001584537,0.9982081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015296066,0.00023570137,0.0000788258,0.00028822126,0.00037792348,0.000004105978,0.000056626184,0.000028665143,0.9836339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863666,0.000047031757,0.0001610767,0.00043384096,0.00038899135,0.00033241554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988476,0.00007603816,0.00025698388,0.00042400986,0.00016385279,0.00023153289],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013295676,0.00023011121,0.00026374852,0.000029497267,0.0011215772,0.00015747089,0.0006128659,0.00035040238,0.00015121765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015710386,0.00028730513,0.00017470952,0.000011279701,0.00058694475,0.00023968569,0.00026321845,0.00042768786,0.00037438667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007898285,0.000005116525,9.246201e-7,0.00001353142,0.000034970002,0.000031179403,0.0002179291,0.0000036534882,0.0000038596045,0.93506926,0.0642813,0.00033035132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002029071,0.000012137805,0.000020238527,0.00008342301,0.000079011676,0.0000016366441,0.00014878884,0.000022240003,0.000029846746,0.00032654454,0.99874073,0.0003325018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020825949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042190895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93474275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000521118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035533184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18233132","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660643.003.0006","title":"Punishment and Disgorgement as Contract Remedies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Breach of contract; Punishment (psychology); Supreme court; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031176931064890476,"score_gpt":0.2737984705954415,"score_spread":0.24262153953055102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W18233132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12219427,0.00004967556,0.00009579768,0.00062453834,0.000069672875,0.0002098952,0.0000075101734,0.000048787857,0.87669986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272948,0.00022906692,0.00014284003,0.00008026582,0.00008607774,0.0000015330576,0.0000014995577,0.0000027925423,0.07216116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946946,0.000042053234,0.00004656369,0.00009054168,0.00013676035,0.00021460283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964315,0.000037232137,0.000035836376,0.000097110096,0.000026653328,0.00016000318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016842088,0.000052071293,0.0000611115,0.000017188087,0.000499221,0.000034967456,0.00012659591,0.000037427188,0.000023876682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011884181,0.000053445972,0.00002385367,0.000012481015,0.00016100437,0.00016271781,0.00011676258,0.000058018475,0.0000010352657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008649984,0.000024982848,0.0018605475,0.0000033603792,0.000014537793,0.0000011079582,0.005187677,2.386734e-7,0.00004651191,0.9876778,0.000514581,0.0046600145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014957045,0.00000871213,0.0027833746,0.0000039637857,0.000022301989,2.4741553e-7,0.0027140891,0.0000042296538,0.00015477014,0.00013632461,0.9939524,0.000070009155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019372978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022737157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062716754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000281998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38396546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W182545986","doi":"","title":"Bankruptcy in Crisis - A Regency Saga","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislation; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Political science; Economics; History; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.015863895045829742,"score_gpt":0.3032716756762472,"score_spread":0.28740778063041744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W182545986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80929506,0.0050596916,0.013640375,0.086524345,0.00029448583,0.00043636694,0.0000034737725,0.00010865775,0.084637575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370724,0.0044316724,0.00012332886,0.00018717513,0.00031448423,0.0000083740015,5.7467923e-7,0.000008208121,0.0012189422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978357,0.00006151336,0.00019366007,0.00013091094,0.00024468586,0.0015335575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996734,0.000016012964,0.000071085866,0.00010623668,0.00004321606,0.00009002486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014954982,0.00006862607,0.00008965393,0.00007889807,0.0004656446,0.00006549715,0.00030421777,0.00006204016,0.000069275746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058456226,0.00006451354,0.00007088522,0.00039017736,0.000050792747,0.00028286412,0.000019987698,0.0009991344,0.00008687424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037101584,0.000052598865,0.0005071915,5.631342e-7,0.000008444491,0.0000019837223,0.0022974177,0.00006009485,0.000030823863,0.99328655,0.000062974825,0.0036876579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003948222,0.000045170287,0.0007768712,0.000008491729,0.000007031179,0.000023078943,0.013541976,0.0000016223836,0.000020831827,0.94487983,0.040194742,0.0001055591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006159607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07299504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18441221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016680865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003673901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9439204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1828715469","doi":"10.1017/s0008197315000306","title":"THE MODERN FUNCTIONS OF THE ECONOMIC TORTS: REVIEWING THE ENGLISH, CANADIAN, AUSTRALIAN, AND NEW ZEALAND POSITIONS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Harm; Liability; Function (biology); Law; Phenomenon; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.04985250084441758,"score_gpt":0.2863151102956585,"score_spread":0.2364626094512409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1828715469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18763916,0.003940539,0.000098807504,0.53847206,0.0027884415,0.0012117714,0.00020659057,0.000039739505,0.2656029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97861123,0.00049877353,0.000010544518,0.0006289105,0.0012256367,0.000009228532,0.000001059202,0.000007138126,0.019007478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908197,0.00021650227,0.00021471175,0.00007792082,0.000162488,0.00024639105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903584,0.00015169487,0.00014387465,0.00028608352,0.000114223716,0.00026826863],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013372425,0.00006998111,0.00008441761,0.000009901642,0.00370553,0.0003389726,0.00052237837,0.0000350136,0.000017208446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008493069,0.000030443614,0.000082461025,0.00010185434,0.00043708895,0.00016039568,0.00005114751,0.00030953524,0.0000116985675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006904704,0.0000080984955,0.0008100843,0.0000018690401,0.00006677196,7.7416036e-7,0.011408352,0.0006000516,0.000019140884,0.54491234,0.43831354,0.0038520938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009390969,0.0000072658745,0.0014665532,0.000016813767,0.00005389746,0.000026144735,0.0027802577,0.00004889156,0.0000069625225,0.004195564,0.99125546,0.00004825294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3139987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4951921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79097205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024131167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087595586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840251136","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567751.003.0010","title":"Philosophical Foundations of Proprietary Remedies","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Plaintiff; Law; Unjust enrichment; Constructive; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.07363486617077286,"score_gpt":0.3356004789627711,"score_spread":0.26196561279199826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840251136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004514878,0.000089625595,0.000075744014,0.04147911,0.000052927528,0.00028783,0.000016193018,0.000063054846,0.957931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032081448,0.00054633105,0.0011765816,0.00032325287,0.0007285668,0.0000055799974,0.000034756446,0.000012482578,0.965091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908966,0.0000101300975,0.00024266417,0.00017416653,0.00036518535,0.000118170145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936014,0.000053561835,0.00012447887,0.00022029175,0.00016468538,0.00007686645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016952994,0.000103500606,0.0001801125,0.000050398845,0.00027537413,0.000022066859,0.00023048703,0.00022254854,0.0018697635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040205825,0.000091539805,0.00011785482,0.000031857136,0.00045781082,0.00006592724,0.000038944094,0.00019585693,0.00016563827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012018398,0.0000128349375,0.0000015360586,0.000005030699,0.000013837736,4.5665035e-7,0.0002685131,3.1606845e-7,0.0000065905265,0.98917294,0.0021487253,0.008368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020041987,0.000010646506,0.00001243745,0.000014119239,0.000017274984,1.263838e-7,0.000021731454,0.0000010145858,0.000004442898,0.4334691,0.56636494,0.000064117325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024601803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008830367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56421626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004251758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026582187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842792250","doi":"10.14324/111.2052-1871.028","title":"Internal Goods To Legal Practice: Reclaiming Fuller With MacIntyre","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Business; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.040872166261681886,"score_gpt":0.3787752246125979,"score_spread":0.337903058350916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842792250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36792842,0.0006466994,0.0082988655,0.07489925,0.0005045679,0.00026110976,0.000004405587,0.000027725515,0.54742897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887799,0.00005427464,0.0080361655,0.0015670237,0.0004729194,0.00000201853,7.536904e-8,0.0000053662984,0.0010822362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901277,0.000075021424,0.00020846336,0.000096284864,0.00044883418,0.00015859946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998952,0.00009759775,0.0002024307,0.000082172235,0.00030271217,0.00036311167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010277384,0.000064080734,0.0001212608,0.000033521465,0.00025225757,0.00015445055,0.00021831237,0.000038521644,0.000018923163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018154764,0.000046412177,0.000028348446,0.0001226357,0.00012914212,0.00073830015,0.00004911533,0.00021862469,0.0000122239235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043835142,0.00013991464,0.0017865768,0.000009659878,0.000057497098,0.00017765627,0.022162186,0.00014287584,0.00027689373,0.9614902,0.006843395,0.0064747627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002541318,0.0002687968,0.0002700504,0.00006984726,0.0000263064,0.00014939137,0.0039414396,0.000008908084,0.00013324175,0.0008339996,0.9939605,0.000083408006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018565776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009169669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006831513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026523124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28066024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1847878306","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Solution: Recent Developments in the Law of Directors’ Duties in the Context of Financially Distressed Corporations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Creditor; Insolvency; Duty; Corporation; Law; Context (archaeology); Companies Act; Shareholder; Corporate law; Commonwealth; Business; Business judgment rule; Supreme court; Accounting; Corporate governance; Political science; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.05785189667741133,"score_gpt":0.330934282237167,"score_spread":0.27308238555975567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1847878306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8359091,0.00483467,0.000024096751,0.110433675,0.00027326867,0.000578363,0.00008430434,0.0000053921717,0.04785713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998165,0.0010871643,0.0001358618,0.00043221362,0.000094083116,0.000011788028,0.0000014036536,0.0000025944044,0.00006990616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872696,0.0001865685,0.0005014934,0.00005898098,0.00035973644,0.00016625627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989715,0.00021795859,0.00034504852,0.00008461531,0.0003475303,0.000033296223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012345224,0.00006879904,0.00021136508,0.00006928482,0.0003924516,0.000031463635,0.00037120937,0.00003125656,0.000008025794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028566894,0.00004154321,0.000047233287,0.00046173294,0.00033059274,0.00018087137,0.000024280536,0.00015979788,0.0000012756747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003517385,0.00032698692,0.022175448,0.00001776588,0.00008590649,0.000017471146,0.24166131,0.00009156138,0.00005618655,0.7191764,0.0071125505,0.009243221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004124361,0.00004932828,0.09014686,0.000096581774,0.000028934515,0.0000047054964,0.07501268,0.000003815287,0.00010859649,0.0013182117,0.83271706,0.00010077855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13323705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9535961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002311069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008515697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8725348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1850139930","doi":"","title":"Tort Law and Happiness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Tort; Damages; Plaintiff; Law; Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Liability; Psychology; Normative; Economics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08445209808036379,"score_gpt":0.3742443986249524,"score_spread":0.2897923005445886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1850139930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08268384,0.000036733843,0.00012264239,0.0015002779,0.00002995702,0.000057157915,4.1121072e-7,0.00003872773,0.91553026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98864007,0.000019963118,0.00049575174,0.00027092922,0.000065802866,0.0000068707136,2.1478192e-7,0.0000021565186,0.010498242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977267,0.000010141556,0.000026900387,0.000061027855,0.000051401217,0.0000778611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985105,0.000008414114,0.000011276022,0.00006430884,0.000015575662,0.000049376133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000857314,0.000021894944,0.000028526609,0.0000043079976,0.00019836224,0.000016669566,0.000059321606,0.000019911737,0.00024263428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007568444,0.000019922494,0.000007793141,0.000046688605,0.00011507406,0.000047467747,0.000020215732,0.000023657023,0.00004980791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.266553e-7,0.0000076206084,0.00035867176,8.611391e-7,0.0000011212887,2.91993e-7,0.019153269,2.2782903e-8,0.000083506806,0.9797146,0.00037176505,0.00030767743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037916183,0.0000041268113,0.003912104,0.0000016566518,0.0000028106122,2.1556473e-7,0.004334831,0.0000028036293,0.0002357788,0.0053988816,0.986024,0.00004487341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019769011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041655437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000068371405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016370277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1858628525","doi":"10.4324/9781843147701","title":"The Law of Obligations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.035811282385961644,"score_gpt":0.32937956322692835,"score_spread":0.2935682808409667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1858628525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000018478578,0.00022296532,0.000040563096,0.0033076552,0.00008750753,0.00015290588,0.000014281552,0.000022105465,0.9961502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00900225,0.00015335175,0.00008094354,0.00010604222,0.00037875984,0.000016068356,0.000007851544,0.0000049910914,0.99024975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999531,0.000018760413,0.00011259472,0.000051803865,0.00017543095,0.00011041127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994319,0.00019177145,0.00008284193,0.000177285,0.000071086564,0.00004510873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002693027,0.00004040039,0.000058931746,0.000007063235,0.0006917509,0.000032221757,0.00025360895,0.0000881171,0.00035125815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015587933,0.000025830492,0.000057123296,0.00003801628,0.00045315005,0.000042910542,0.00003470732,0.00008581708,0.000201557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.046347e-8,0.0000036702077,0.0000019306972,0.0000012638909,0.0000049886435,5.514513e-9,0.0004425921,7.428165e-8,7.6390046e-7,0.93830353,0.060675036,0.0005660786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008009238,0.0000010464926,0.000010454886,0.000003450025,0.00000942046,1.7617431e-8,0.0001647529,2.4608497e-7,0.0000046214177,0.11562501,0.8841419,0.00003105322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017517791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010435532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044939414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030832077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5823271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W18604158","doi":"10.4040/jkan.2008.38.3.483","title":"Indefeasible Title in British Columbia: A Comment on the November 2005 Amendments to the Land Title Act","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Land registration; Statute; Government (linguistics); Real property; Law; Political science; Public interest; Business; Land tenure; Geography","score_opus":0.019289165968534323,"score_gpt":0.2790156053745076,"score_spread":0.2597264394059733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W18604158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026770948,0.000033277818,0.0000034477514,0.017945332,0.00009467779,0.00019379213,0.000019345722,0.000012968598,0.9549262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86941284,0.00000908581,0.000026667862,0.007363589,0.00023683754,0.000035289948,0.0000026865957,0.0000048167026,0.12290819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996806,0.000020654452,0.00004420861,0.000058555175,0.00010032668,0.00009570258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99984115,0.00002283931,0.000011432268,0.00009180438,0.0000071461436,0.00002561341],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013082636,0.000019316334,0.000028182418,0.0000034811756,0.00015936143,0.00013433603,0.00011191383,0.00001942177,0.006485553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008311832,0.000017609265,0.000013541059,0.000070705086,0.00002379963,0.000021719205,0.000021417885,0.00006959405,0.0046297777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.5162112e-7,0.000025079647,0.0014104464,3.739372e-7,0.000001244578,5.2630674e-7,0.00002240611,0.0000038796247,0.0000032380667,0.034739755,0.9636333,0.00015950685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040572868,0.0000024967308,0.0026649684,0.000005123611,0.0000010029122,1.1720854e-7,0.000027371016,0.000001854698,0.000005855274,0.0013211451,0.9959038,0.00002569009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1008527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46222937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8426419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044760935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024834115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99614525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863183068","doi":"10.1108/ijlbe-11-2014-0034","title":"The acceleration dilemma: can English law accommodate constructive acceleration?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Law; Damages; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Originality; English law; Nomothetic and idiographic; Breach of contract; Dilemma; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0584758481953842,"score_gpt":0.3352275647461609,"score_spread":0.2767517165507767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863183068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6980653,0.000348226,0.0011320567,0.09380216,0.0028403057,0.00086017465,0.0000760912,0.000025195563,0.20285049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974944,0.00018974635,0.00028568666,0.00092846336,0.0009565716,0.000023273902,0.0000060795455,0.0000057918096,0.00010996469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815255,0.00027299332,0.00039281347,0.00009846443,0.0009314674,0.00015167869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990106,0.00022054961,0.00030483303,0.00016208502,0.00022180694,0.00008013094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015522301,0.000082956765,0.000091408976,0.000025039903,0.00041637215,0.00042314146,0.0010786699,0.000046891844,0.000045969315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011864562,0.000052090192,0.00006553311,0.000051199324,0.00043985812,0.0004515421,0.00009718227,0.00026004645,0.000013318044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029945812,0.00008350132,0.0005336582,2.5228488e-7,0.000037627,0.00000717129,0.011041845,0.0014255365,0.00004837883,0.9847526,0.00049762597,0.0015418903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062590925,0.00004068377,0.0013917614,0.000010723742,0.000015186186,0.00001600161,0.0061427155,0.00007590325,0.0003886142,0.039196026,0.95199955,0.000096940144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027659638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053327912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040116018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117927135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41813284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1872345973","doi":"","title":"Choice of Law for Unjust Enrichment: Rome II and the Common Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Common law; Choice of law; Civil law (Civil law); Unjust enrichment; Comparative law; Political science; Scots law; Public law; Municipal law; Rule of law; Private law; Sources of law; Conflict of laws; Restitution","score_opus":0.02427874144362789,"score_gpt":0.3117497525974943,"score_spread":0.2874710111538664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1872345973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80169475,0.0068514436,0.0013871389,0.038048916,0.0001622202,0.0010020647,0.000017170234,0.000042481242,0.15079379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536014,0.0021194627,0.000036427617,0.00029101683,0.00024199719,0.000014532914,9.73825e-7,0.0000055113373,0.001929955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883616,0.00007076424,0.0001634056,0.00007849887,0.00016959557,0.00068159396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995117,0.00017463209,0.00011782549,0.00008914182,0.000057277743,0.000049407896],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012045167,0.00005537905,0.0001182403,0.000012585066,0.002177957,0.000025138095,0.00023212915,0.00003708227,0.000008834856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022716866,0.000037758706,0.00006942906,0.00008416394,0.0005593505,0.00014630008,0.00003326605,0.00040639093,0.0000015530892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017208406,0.000028090812,0.000102187565,0.0000014464988,0.00002584009,6.945498e-8,0.0019155999,0.0000033947354,0.000040145944,0.9973319,0.000043987817,0.0004901287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001130454,0.00011505217,0.00021929728,0.0000047481117,0.000032659696,0.000024471054,0.001446077,0.000019193481,0.00005470372,0.6107703,0.3861111,0.000071904666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064359745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031634446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38656157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015551275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004254829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1873932661","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.008","title":"The re-imagined trust","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Sociology; Library science; Commercial law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03620456780716233,"score_gpt":0.24599537126215834,"score_spread":0.209790803454996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1873932661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016487658,0.00025887246,0.00007100049,0.0004798302,0.00021466536,0.0003937649,0.00010871231,0.00012297473,0.9983337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044328445,0.00058376254,0.000028322956,0.00006090201,0.0005161987,0.0000014051146,0.0000132050845,0.000022437003,0.9943409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895644,0.000048281145,0.00011794297,0.00024134462,0.0002942749,0.00034169224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988966,0.0001286259,0.00015823981,0.0004781298,0.00012996599,0.00020841575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002545665,0.00017529006,0.00016028598,0.00003738089,0.0016899294,0.00011145068,0.00076631765,0.00022232557,0.000018462435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015561436,0.00016184099,0.000160916,0.000008688603,0.00072476343,0.000094814786,0.00025833756,0.0003645847,0.00007720455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010233386,0.0000034030154,0.000002380561,0.000004851762,0.000032294465,0.000006059634,0.00027911022,1.2434192e-7,0.0000032858327,0.956552,0.040549494,0.0025567333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011412622,0.000003656429,0.000016651295,0.000015813663,0.00009397798,4.982556e-7,0.00030475404,0.0000035626622,0.000011392575,0.00005704488,0.99917585,0.0002026972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017300431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113758695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95862633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022580165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019075692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188289234","doi":"","title":"Concepts and principles in unjust enrichment : a comparative study","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Epistemology; Political science; Taxonomy (biology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21143543527517564,"score_gpt":0.46455757867133984,"score_spread":0.25312214339616423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188289234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697577,0.000026624068,0.000097985816,0.002760212,0.000024837624,0.0011514919,0.000033393713,0.000049964896,0.026097825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976332,0.000064449116,0.0005637921,0.00002611092,0.00008020279,0.000008151187,0.000010688901,0.000007154614,0.0016062232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975184,0.00061760267,0.00018532017,0.00044965942,0.0006826647,0.0005463413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888605,0.00029955513,0.000060885865,0.0002486184,0.0002590144,0.0002458703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011536701,0.00012490389,0.00021318615,0.00052186096,0.0008514175,0.000094091716,0.000546719,0.0000837976,0.000054634962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012910631,0.00013218205,0.000036540652,0.0018642333,0.00072980754,0.0003161201,0.00041667745,0.0005145026,0.00003131125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056247456,0.001411388,0.016447429,0.0000076198135,0.000025031119,0.00014329886,0.017456252,0.00036804937,0.0000621541,0.96360683,0.000039029594,0.00037667094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024571158,0.00031914597,0.09801709,0.000051036124,0.000013883741,0.0000011289849,0.11258416,0.000106894324,0.000031775555,0.0020826866,0.7840702,0.0002648986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037296176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12845272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006908654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006294934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96911454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883317298","doi":"10.21083/surg.v4i1.1095","title":"The development and effects of the Ontario Farming and Food Production Protection Act, 1998","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SURG Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Nuisance; Business; Government (linguistics); Production (economics); Agriculture; Agricultural economics; Public economics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.01568017544420445,"score_gpt":0.2469182020156531,"score_spread":0.23123802657144865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883317298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99683064,0.000042747688,0.000039249622,0.00174995,0.0004157767,0.00021403498,6.47312e-8,0.0000036475076,0.00070385745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914837,0.0000222243,0.00017108189,0.000006783545,0.00018173673,0.000010846752,2.7125063e-8,0.0000017578,0.0004571493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996141,0.000043519303,0.0000849203,0.00005113488,0.00012669276,0.000079609636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976236,0.000040872743,0.00008588658,0.00004818186,0.00003084705,0.000031857104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006891818,0.000028689416,0.00003206626,0.00000956614,0.0015480272,0.00007857964,0.000060377904,0.000022734343,0.0000014388179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083877545,0.00001542071,0.000013332596,0.000055712808,0.00010406723,0.00007512392,0.000024058636,0.00023863881,3.3763985e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018859986,0.000068126035,0.078079395,0.00003601341,0.00006194955,3.85692e-7,0.09178433,0.0000028858944,0.030240703,0.011813131,0.00013724968,0.787757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012629601,0.00002267438,0.18538219,0.000028315068,0.000010593065,0.000021974523,0.0008906505,0.000002904049,0.017170751,0.0023774165,0.7939094,0.000056865676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013820295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16968293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7937721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003354296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000190684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1891487589","doi":"","title":"Reforming Judicial Review at the State Level","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Judicial review; State (computer science); Political science; Position (finance); Law; Judicial activism; Common law; Judicial opinion; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.02507024301001042,"score_gpt":0.32969639299927295,"score_spread":0.3046261499892625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1891487589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6680856,0.035489976,0.0016813348,0.17237131,0.0012192508,0.0010524977,0.000022700751,0.00011484571,0.1199625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88315666,0.085442364,0.00003525486,0.0012421311,0.001076881,0.00001484376,0.0000018097113,0.00001286109,0.02901722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809283,0.00007549251,0.00018821866,0.00010012353,0.0003046165,0.0012387423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950254,0.00004414195,0.00013831122,0.00015516451,0.00008007625,0.00007978891],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037498137,0.00006623466,0.00009037795,0.000016057174,0.0017357286,0.000051313305,0.00041780804,0.000036006277,0.00021137779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014719681,0.000041604453,0.0000870399,0.0001761995,0.00015026603,0.00013894495,0.00005486571,0.0016488729,0.00015044004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005842403,0.000021406919,0.00022398801,0.0000068129675,0.00003262727,7.99249e-7,0.0011752665,0.0000012600833,0.0006793445,0.8651597,0.002008178,0.13068476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008804459,0.00001699799,0.00022033943,0.000027418504,0.000020353977,0.000051208433,0.00065767136,0.0000021599794,0.000041637235,0.17332713,0.825464,0.000083053405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020023098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15248804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8234558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050148024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002196458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897746625","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495175.015","title":"Areas of legal indeterminacy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; CLARITY; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Morality; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Linguistics; Fuzzy logic; Biology","score_opus":0.03605391527842726,"score_gpt":0.23971164739363196,"score_spread":0.20365773211520471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897746625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023888379,0.000047374404,0.00005904048,0.000059198963,0.00008680734,0.00031221248,0.00019729113,0.000070009686,0.9989292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022325234,0.00014585143,0.000039755727,0.000026784532,0.00016614511,5.774759e-7,0.000011241932,0.000018900822,0.97726554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999001,0.000032664695,0.00015732978,0.00028344835,0.0003123278,0.00021321181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901307,0.000056597735,0.00024095499,0.0003730928,0.00015815855,0.00015812195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000094548814,0.0001744798,0.00026467242,0.00009799219,0.00033962453,0.000035366746,0.00056727685,0.00029315377,0.00003465083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011285426,0.00021590153,0.00019440855,0.000010412765,0.0005642053,0.0000988162,0.00020550631,0.0002931295,0.00002198092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008701672,0.000009586924,0.0000038557,0.00002059714,0.000032774125,0.000037925907,0.00022180512,3.7806896e-7,0.0000052204987,0.984296,0.013987393,0.0013757634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001636592,0.000015428648,0.000022474624,0.000057691737,0.000092511975,0.0000015161686,0.000094122035,0.000007299826,0.000050951403,0.000029074728,0.9992505,0.00021480575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024715206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004604077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98526305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016615761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016646272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88042086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899114343","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1305","title":"The Constitutional Dimensions of Aboriginal Title","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06174705072543573,"score_gpt":0.382995987188844,"score_spread":0.32124893646340824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899114343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027332811,0.031241864,0.00009633557,0.008972378,0.00015742659,0.00016726619,0.000011625551,0.000015184339,0.9593106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7744707,0.18731917,0.0016112961,0.0038270287,0.00078165915,0.00010182897,0.000025381432,0.000013145313,0.031849787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965084,0.00003064557,0.00007662527,0.00003936655,0.00014272754,0.000059821752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969393,0.00003630659,0.00002738746,0.00009396069,0.00010319995,0.00004523807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003629789,0.000021402262,0.000050868868,0.0000020899681,0.00017112076,0.0000081522785,0.0001001582,0.000011257672,0.00022259705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046452442,0.000012237857,0.000026760508,0.00006557143,0.0004326222,0.000025578436,0.00001009401,0.000031895222,0.00047232385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.4349406e-7,0.0000042282118,0.000010798148,0.000008491173,0.0000017405442,7.59128e-8,0.000016701415,1.6794107e-7,0.0000014180991,0.9279412,0.07162446,0.0003906009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016715641,0.0000018610169,0.0000039238903,0.0000693845,0.000008868637,3.320647e-7,0.000012932771,0.0000013098262,0.0000030214667,0.0044686394,0.9953944,0.000018599649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024893534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018325908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9274608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016861695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002795302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6070925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1899570945","doi":"","title":"Constructive Trusts and the Deemed Agency Limitation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Unjust enrichment; Premise; Supreme court; Express trust; Agency (philosophy); Law; Confusion; Law and economics; Settlor; Proposition; Business; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Restitution; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010069217217499893,"score_gpt":0.2766190479962005,"score_spread":0.26654983077870065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1899570945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92128354,0.0023034378,0.01289245,0.034123812,0.00015367441,0.00039582132,0.0000017952823,0.00003473456,0.02881076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947306,0.004231682,0.00012947504,0.000114718845,0.00025984785,0.0000086083055,5.357294e-7,0.0000038853327,0.0005206664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988769,0.00012391486,0.000110705776,0.000077749675,0.0001608338,0.00064983784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996668,0.000087060325,0.00008181338,0.00005320081,0.000061238694,0.000049848873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016179323,0.000047449215,0.000062351915,0.000021996833,0.0011644223,0.00007717991,0.00013429501,0.000033051838,0.000009263056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015732009,0.000032090644,0.000040583436,0.0001289126,0.00036186786,0.00014924524,0.00001310339,0.00064835115,0.000014704313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010565631,0.000007430306,0.0001273821,2.8474633e-7,0.000018723564,1.7909728e-7,0.005249852,0.000009956646,0.000014502656,0.9859616,0.000006123571,0.008593395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009233703,0.00002062992,0.0012009486,0.0000030410695,0.000018162078,0.000033648063,0.0155861275,0.0000056522867,0.000007611403,0.97615796,0.0059941043,0.000048725033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007008713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061155823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07344706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038967875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016624752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8955912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900911969","doi":"","title":"Weather, Leather, and the Obligation to Disclose: Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc. (c)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prospectus; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Statutory law; Issuer; Political science; Statute; Business; Law and economics; Economics; History","score_opus":0.022300021670255393,"score_gpt":0.2654372180379261,"score_spread":0.2431371963676707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900911969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6066919,0.0004617204,0.0011145563,0.024866099,0.000050322407,0.00044836506,0.000009886269,0.000053885786,0.3663033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96465826,0.000792022,0.00073942007,0.00009832621,0.000054620774,8.8545045e-7,0.0000014456762,0.0000054018124,0.033649635],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938637,0.00008393025,0.000048826438,0.00014797221,0.00019010426,0.00014280777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995479,0.0000579494,0.000059424103,0.00018425565,0.000057555157,0.00009294568],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023626561,0.00006487878,0.00011472192,0.000011962384,0.00089861004,0.000014473608,0.00025811457,0.000053474978,0.0022834307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020934029,0.000057176447,0.00004753779,0.00007555772,0.0005219646,0.0002790337,0.00009818939,0.000060264956,0.00004225979],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017161715,0.00012043,0.0028907184,0.0000092968,0.000065922795,0.0000041685116,0.52927136,0.000020918338,0.00085181865,0.4299339,0.0063433675,0.030316466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017593724,0.00007544026,0.2249887,0.000021318961,0.0000648595,0.0000025171296,0.12661897,0.00022331631,0.00003130062,0.0010871246,0.64483017,0.00029692877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34148487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.177282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6384868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011260376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006330057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903345289","doi":"10.21991/c9tt12","title":"Abdelrazik: Tort Liability for Exercise of Prerogative Powers?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Tort; Liability; Strict liability; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05324074836314739,"score_gpt":0.3134082847570873,"score_spread":0.2601675363939399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903345289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0179296,0.0006727431,0.30534965,0.0051738126,0.0022051837,0.0044919634,0.0019044991,0.00037084482,0.6619017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906329,0.00006980187,0.007740161,0.00025492557,0.00011189993,0.00040117145,0.000068362264,0.000008288595,0.0007125098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978018,0.00005557759,0.0006088529,0.00047412256,0.00042897722,0.0006306713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778736,0.00021426882,0.00027917014,0.00039245497,0.001052973,0.00027377412],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006644878,0.00022928452,0.00034816607,0.00012414911,0.0016809165,0.000039322695,0.0004915873,0.00021448979,0.0005194473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007610176,0.00022998155,0.0003190384,0.00036982397,0.009008286,0.00068434695,0.00012362443,0.00015157534,0.000073220435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009979848,0.0002749516,0.0075729736,0.000025262985,0.000045415873,0.0000010445325,0.0012636292,0.000036422036,0.00008473385,0.9874304,0.0023134998,0.0008518724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018687192,0.00015064707,0.0022958382,0.00024080841,0.00019187908,0.000011348919,0.016089112,0.00023245867,0.0033645146,0.24779741,0.72699773,0.0007595361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010628599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076982635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002264618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022834176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905011711","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2755","title":"Disclaimers of Contractual Liability and Voluntary Obligations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Disclaimer; Obligation; Business; Law and economics; Liability; Law; Skepticism; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.011527023319363389,"score_gpt":0.2828612464763391,"score_spread":0.2713342231569757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905011711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18851395,0.00009747478,0.0027255835,0.0090104155,0.0001549502,0.00015731454,0.000020722351,0.000025155474,0.7992944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983123,0.000053480348,0.0010294656,0.0001503855,0.00023145738,0.00000303414,0.0000017099412,0.00000438349,0.00021379293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920166,0.00012656262,0.00020712745,0.000097095486,0.00020642769,0.00016110927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993167,0.00018144748,0.00012213699,0.00010588162,0.00010099177,0.00017283206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081022066,0.0000541607,0.000110203706,0.00001726768,0.0008668885,0.00007640208,0.00014719296,0.000048930484,0.00014653723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012354134,0.00004687858,0.00005266053,0.00007111018,0.00044147432,0.00023424235,0.000026710215,0.0001750093,0.0000074066593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003382423,0.00004082122,0.003967554,0.000002880348,0.000009636848,2.068394e-7,0.0011095076,0.000011523732,0.00020196609,0.9914421,0.00015536367,0.0030551022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007095247,0.00009813788,0.048896555,0.000039495142,0.000077096585,0.000017692853,0.0034822153,0.00042389764,0.00037761335,0.62499416,0.32063237,0.00025124848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034710165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09490144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80979836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003114238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006196527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9717178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1908306056","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v20i2.93","title":"CIVIL LITIGATION NEGLIGENCE AND THE MALAYSIAN ADVOCATE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Sanctions; Common law; Duty; Adversarial system; Political science; Civil litigation; Civil procedure; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.010984879505898368,"score_gpt":0.26570876436968294,"score_spread":0.25472388486378456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1908306056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21352889,0.00054611365,0.0017457501,0.15705359,0.0003447284,0.00048457127,0.0000024562964,0.000046575242,0.62624735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759483,0.00024037628,0.0001817057,0.0006868344,0.00047868845,0.000017068978,2.894657e-7,0.000003286469,0.0007968916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999384,0.000103262406,0.000120623474,0.000065389446,0.00017016346,0.00015659406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999581,0.000068967216,0.00007383644,0.00007724024,0.00008619134,0.00011280353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005038976,0.000040611005,0.000053445616,0.000009521766,0.0015105603,0.00039962426,0.0001685035,0.000028875356,0.00035104726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037332324,0.00002560851,0.00003234213,0.0000846156,0.00043899918,0.00032475026,0.000026136406,0.00015327468,0.00010311923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017086188,0.0000058532946,0.00022069247,8.939687e-7,0.0000041077415,3.751614e-7,0.0032899464,0.0000074498626,0.00007464086,0.9908676,0.0006901907,0.004836523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005545872,0.000016653537,0.009744212,0.000025826894,0.00002071542,0.000031789557,0.0065146284,0.00055497815,0.00013549486,0.36549142,0.61676323,0.000146451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007228613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004301621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78406596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021759824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004387513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911595472","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567751.003.0007","title":"Unjust Enrichment: Nearer to Tort than Contract","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Damages; Duty; Tort; Law; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Breach of contract; Business; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.023934110313687102,"score_gpt":0.34448544262272696,"score_spread":0.32055133230903987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911595472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07958619,0.00001587644,0.0008420531,0.032912396,0.00006172626,0.00025906257,0.0000028482498,0.000102916434,0.88621694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742147,0.000009613707,0.00046641967,0.0035607852,0.00021805792,0.000008620647,0.0000012587233,0.0000020465259,0.021518504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994446,0.000015499778,0.00007888059,0.0001151035,0.00016103056,0.0001848754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996604,0.000022172973,0.0000152354405,0.00011637249,0.000034952714,0.00015088024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015790878,0.00004210444,0.000053286378,0.0000151321565,0.0002783426,0.00008033306,0.00015346118,0.00003076237,0.0008020207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027712636,0.000035469904,0.000029841594,0.00016328957,0.000021366124,0.00012126816,0.000012086788,0.00004031249,0.00052982883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024821888,0.00005569844,0.0011227825,2.6094375e-7,0.000002441971,6.9216196e-7,0.0023778665,0.0000050273993,0.0003403511,0.9746543,0.008504587,0.0129335085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005799059,0.00002320006,0.04464613,0.000001430151,0.0000030793053,1.0159422e-7,0.00057001493,0.0000071932873,0.000116550524,0.00194664,0.95255613,0.00007152828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030567606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016633006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043729717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053771375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8781564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924644488","doi":"","title":"The 'PPSA': Continuing the reconceptualisation of retention of title (Romalpa) security","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Security interest; Lien; Legislature; Perfection; Accounts receivable; Business; Debt; Statute; Property (philosophy); Publishing; Project commissioning; Tangible property; Law and economics; Law; Property law; Economics; Accounting; Property rights; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05981142648466718,"score_gpt":0.24275514738509368,"score_spread":0.1829437209004265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924644488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61772597,0.00012337802,0.000658879,0.00063302735,0.00011746926,0.00009279099,0.000012536068,0.000007255206,0.3806287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981122,0.00006145103,0.00022367644,0.0000031363686,0.000038796807,1.094157e-8,3.2275292e-7,9.81289e-7,0.0015594519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999702,0.000054955053,0.00007069786,0.000027358687,0.00009894991,0.000046074936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962837,0.000029911991,0.00018273994,0.00005761932,0.00007819029,0.000023156876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002818465,0.000017807817,0.000040813855,0.000008113046,0.00030608618,0.000005798463,0.00016416537,0.000022106044,0.00026058784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017748818,0.000012881806,0.000050802177,0.000044508033,0.00028866032,0.00005493943,0.000017606895,0.000058457696,0.0000061836877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001730553,0.000014450333,0.001027819,0.0000033706765,0.000021261036,3.6269506e-7,0.1503514,0.000001580001,0.00012328029,0.84281015,0.0013982432,0.0042307493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004544096,0.000058133457,0.008535853,0.000073702395,0.00009227208,0.0000026084826,0.26903012,0.000044412478,0.0007251419,0.04231052,0.6785767,0.00009613542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002260103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020703457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8004997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012398137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034560082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34166148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W193000733","doi":"10.29173/alr103","title":"The Alberta Court of Appeal Opines on the S.E.F. No. 44 Limitation: The Status Quo and the Unresolved","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Manning Diversified Forest Products (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Status quo; Ambiguity; Law; Discoverability; Status quo bias; Consistency (knowledge bases); Political science; Law and economics; Court decision; Settlement (finance); Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02785123681787295,"score_gpt":0.29926522237002173,"score_spread":0.2714139855521488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W193000733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002050356,0.03559202,0.000004181992,0.5698036,0.00014651843,0.0030164218,0.0000048460333,0.00001076673,0.3893713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6941661,0.2544853,0.000032426622,0.024018103,0.0004269446,0.0012229158,0.000013522666,0.000024803237,0.025609862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837714,0.00053968764,0.0003234618,0.00016244457,0.0003004677,0.00029680133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162525,0.007334711,0.00021262202,0.0005909019,0.00016485552,0.00007167718],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010663655,0.000120659446,0.0002043318,0.0000038275502,0.0016582061,0.00018010139,0.0006561443,0.00003639768,0.00017323592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012469466,0.000041495266,0.00011640516,0.00021419916,0.0012689378,0.000104575935,0.00009685572,0.00015957534,0.0003571791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034263073,0.00001257901,0.00006749169,0.00004134886,0.000024946721,1.5277603e-8,0.0013159127,6.006034e-7,0.0000013541257,0.97053784,0.025451763,0.0025427227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012446067,0.000013263068,0.00050142565,0.00021816822,0.000051579456,3.6052944e-7,0.00043604383,0.00005129673,0.000002052552,0.0039027678,0.99463344,0.00006515307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11349864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09839523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96918166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017388702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008059326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935777987","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12005","title":"The Indirect Influence of Politics on Tort Liability of Public Authorities in English Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Politics; Law; Political science; Liability; State (computer science); Ideology; Tying; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03873999164966311,"score_gpt":0.32544327532297485,"score_spread":0.2867032836733117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935777987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5609353,0.07660026,0.0000013389443,0.0242733,0.0001717715,0.0028561256,0.000059483882,0.00011361786,0.33498877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166763,0.08109724,0.00010721556,0.0016126273,0.00006478709,0.00012441039,0.0000017359052,0.000004678695,0.00031100865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987596,0.00021859887,0.0003799169,0.00012815255,0.0002803116,0.00023336861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987236,0.00041251915,0.00015348004,0.0003183427,0.00032513725,0.00006687729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016579794,0.00007054106,0.0002361024,8.037078e-7,0.00032738352,0.000045132256,0.00037166863,0.00006448891,0.000041443578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043882098,0.000050213333,0.00017262169,0.0002970737,0.00094076147,0.00020459872,0.00006099766,0.00014974146,0.000008416962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.244593e-8,0.00003861621,0.0015133608,0.00031802448,0.0000061685228,9.7812585e-9,0.0017413077,6.8621466e-7,0.0000042163765,0.9946382,0.0009168173,0.000822498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003785385,0.0000130376375,0.005031361,0.0003929921,0.000010582574,2.7076297e-8,0.0011649493,0.0000017349794,0.000039058395,0.014084725,0.9791566,0.00006709093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008171876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017577976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000844466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014328027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1936271412","doi":"10.21153/dlr2009vol14no2art146","title":"Crown Immunity in a Food Crisis: A Consideration of the 2008 Listeriosis Outbreak in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Law; Criticism; Fell; Government (linguistics); Political science; Listeria; Public health; Listeria monocytogenes; Sociology; Medicine; History; Biology","score_opus":0.03384199023218695,"score_gpt":0.3054331807311877,"score_spread":0.2715911904990007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1936271412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8226568,0.028500285,0.000012959743,0.08522084,0.00017591419,0.0029048831,0.00007518735,0.00002743094,0.06042569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99160206,0.0013257132,0.00003801653,0.0069804676,0.000011657537,0.000031717085,0.0000013986628,0.000002066161,0.0000069063854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990545,0.0002474012,0.00031001717,0.00009209767,0.00016628928,0.00012973156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995351,0.000052127718,0.00011173952,0.00022543826,0.00004674394,0.000028882772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042822392,0.00005551413,0.00018193264,0.000010240126,0.00013692521,0.000018128441,0.00020990282,0.000024946256,0.000047609574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012289152,0.000042083033,0.000044362012,0.00037087683,0.000048827278,0.00007525889,0.00002912738,0.00010471095,0.00000186204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016550811,0.000053078107,0.0012322942,0.00013570243,0.0000034506618,9.661367e-7,0.00056124525,0.0000052882683,0.000017233633,0.9939938,0.0022499743,0.001745294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013807723,0.000013757715,0.045787252,0.0012159544,0.0000138881505,0.0000011073346,0.00018159665,0.000006306095,0.00006826978,0.0023522342,0.95011014,0.00011139491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98392946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020655632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068945705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17160963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W193895850","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1089","title":"Something to Talk About: Regulation and Justification in Canadian Municipal Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Public law; Local government","score_opus":0.024350225491007123,"score_gpt":0.3172517836076514,"score_spread":0.29290155811664426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W193895850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24765503,0.00005536025,0.000110855406,0.0131029235,0.00029730107,0.00021289288,0.000008595186,0.000020477783,0.73853654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675745,0.000024812283,0.001994968,0.0005275862,0.00034769814,0.000009063751,0.0000033169606,0.000007973668,0.0003271181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908346,0.00007022227,0.00019437868,0.00013600885,0.00019411532,0.0003218127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918073,0.00004644892,0.00006914483,0.00013552053,0.00007914819,0.00048901537],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012280154,0.00006299037,0.000078926634,0.0000824101,0.0014107302,0.00032688407,0.00019863131,0.00010607585,0.00013311312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000923717,0.00006481077,0.000023228418,0.00018691388,0.00013298792,0.00035112855,0.000022305429,0.00042257152,0.000022098198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017296688,0.00000974241,0.00031925223,0.0000014468328,0.0000018668488,0.0000021201138,0.0037082967,0.000059027774,0.0017808586,0.9912054,0.00003313839,0.0028771085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024602638,0.000015331665,0.021896664,0.000034325036,0.000013408292,0.000026350644,0.0018669805,0.00060942076,0.00025481443,0.17168719,0.80313283,0.0002166596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9721412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99963415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8195182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013596045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015653529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1952372749","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Mixed Legal Systems: A Challenge to Comparative Trust Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Trust law; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Comparative law; Private law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Substantive law; Commercial law; Choice of law; Convention; Public law","score_opus":0.026263872655850014,"score_gpt":0.32019518113281215,"score_spread":0.29393130847696214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1952372749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6616601,0.0017269045,0.00017693559,0.010267171,0.00015357957,0.00051173713,0.0000059458853,0.000049184237,0.32544845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98897713,0.0011844096,0.000022661052,0.00012235896,0.00044171244,0.000037894944,0.0000011662415,0.000009361295,0.009203284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973584,0.0002230897,0.000278898,0.00018975198,0.00031000577,0.001639877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995439,0.000042446085,0.00006412247,0.00012332178,0.000053646745,0.00017256362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001458487,0.000111351874,0.00020369554,0.00006664589,0.0005851571,0.00016475598,0.00036331397,0.000073471165,0.00015859182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000125868855,0.00010362683,0.00006633049,0.00033925223,0.00008724745,0.00027332478,0.00001571117,0.0009732191,0.00027565865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025393298,0.00007906412,0.00004771725,0.000001288224,0.000019135583,0.0000024863248,0.0044737128,0.00027350627,0.000012203795,0.9910957,0.00009733039,0.0038724297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064421835,0.00019884258,0.00051308493,0.000032516185,0.000012785914,0.000037673533,0.029172078,0.00017618517,0.00000869347,0.039242007,0.9297128,0.0002491302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011214736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1561848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95185375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00119546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013250706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963547191","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1139","title":"Functionalism and Political Economy in the Comparative Study of Consumer Insolvency: An Unfinished Story from England and Wales","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Ideology; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economy; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.03833989309812411,"score_gpt":0.3380792953903343,"score_spread":0.2997394022922102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963547191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631681,0.0001094505,0.00013701746,0.0017041147,0.000027073063,0.00026597994,0.000019956979,0.0000084490985,0.03455987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956083,0.0000042597567,0.000048741476,0.00023762273,0.000096751115,0.000034704768,0.000007697574,0.0000030289127,0.0000063609095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988286,0.0005322527,0.0001915738,0.00017006639,0.0001136139,0.00016391894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873966,0.0010238731,0.00003084654,0.00012523378,0.000029679171,0.000050710165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059621094,0.00007229414,0.00016610694,0.000024352377,0.00018729042,0.000053789987,0.0001274532,0.00005604926,0.0000582022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035947745,0.000053250675,0.000010525702,0.00008084851,0.027554626,0.00012442764,0.000046239064,0.00015488357,0.0000012005715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025855958,0.00027667766,0.0148236,0.0000017961097,0.0000045320526,0.0000010427412,0.03240521,0.0000012579906,0.0000043874797,0.95240206,0.00001696839,0.000036634246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060709385,0.00009381032,0.019855265,0.0000056041913,0.000012307218,3.8366386e-7,0.045471255,0.000044418906,0.0000117971595,0.9233368,0.010482456,0.000078777935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002291334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059128185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03639274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021280552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000345775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9750918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963957161","doi":"10.1093/ojls/20.4.683","title":"Private Law and Private Narratives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Private law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0344943461739869,"score_gpt":0.3392931067860214,"score_spread":0.30479876061203454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963957161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83864063,0.0032966814,0.000032066833,0.01192861,0.00009713337,0.00010152341,0.0000025428342,0.000015224137,0.14588557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860609,0.00933051,0.0014742926,0.00043962005,0.00037079048,0.0000036595748,1.3008874e-7,0.000005973585,0.002314116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991447,0.00006916158,0.00027075727,0.00008804976,0.00024285933,0.00018449838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995039,0.00006931287,0.0001509117,0.000064617176,0.000117866846,0.00009340946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044132856,0.00008335663,0.00020649268,0.00002470935,0.0008040805,0.00009676483,0.00016305342,0.000029583824,0.00009528739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049945127,0.00006138791,0.00006240035,0.00012694346,0.00052493945,0.00045226674,0.000039162886,0.00015110725,0.0000050986782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032332995,0.000042663873,0.0010068786,0.000009003812,0.00013084713,0.000012092209,0.020038113,0.000009379613,0.00014451602,0.9676212,0.00070957845,0.0102433935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019681535,0.00007130057,0.0012468159,0.000030158997,0.000015138248,0.000008741108,0.0038551467,6.801261e-7,0.00007277241,0.015657932,0.9787689,0.000075589836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009800449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035588563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97805935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042183256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003704815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6184418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964402934","doi":"10.7202/042177ar","title":"Le dol d'un locateur peut·il être sanctionné par une diminution du loyer?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Economic rent; Principal (computer security); Humanities; Philosophy; Welfare economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.010087929854050959,"score_gpt":0.2470876940524831,"score_spread":0.23699976419843213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964402934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84645164,0.00015347438,0.023113199,0.03301209,0.0001472856,0.00032424115,0.000019779553,0.000281397,0.096496895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908631,0.00015251202,0.0009385519,0.00078729936,0.0007282845,0.000049298447,0.000015458665,0.000015801974,0.0064497185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894035,0.000070412614,0.0001789136,0.00024222449,0.00022235884,0.00034574137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994328,0.000056272635,0.000081603466,0.00020744342,0.000060172104,0.00016170656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003242526,0.00010421817,0.000115255214,0.000043951484,0.0013771895,0.00009314873,0.0002529938,0.0001922053,0.000112478905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059798596,0.000116993964,0.00009011612,0.00036325562,0.0004340862,0.00022924975,0.00002528267,0.00024906633,0.00024384761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013717337,0.00012501125,0.0021862413,0.000010807522,0.000025464804,0.000005171721,0.01023305,0.0005552279,0.0005747166,0.9373012,0.004604434,0.044364937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003566744,0.000018890509,0.0136914505,0.00001061008,0.000032372973,0.0000063751727,0.0034397999,0.00042191436,0.0015466289,0.021645647,0.9585883,0.00024134458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004953214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063493326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95398384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047937356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019146159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965454850","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2003.tb00208.x","title":"Confidence and the constructive trust","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constructive trust; Law; Declaration; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Commonwealth; Computer science; History; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.037412194110403495,"score_gpt":0.3505393579168602,"score_spread":0.3131271638064567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965454850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08778202,0.007499872,0.0002751311,0.026493754,0.0002656962,0.00048373814,0.000005488548,0.000056594647,0.8771377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546236,0.0009742328,0.00013467635,0.00036313443,0.000057026376,0.00003584006,5.338193e-8,0.0000017599285,0.0029709344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950784,0.00010313081,0.000070911075,0.00009570016,0.00010635726,0.00011607729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995299,0.00027836792,0.00003120456,0.0000676324,0.000066062865,0.00002683291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037231517,0.000044017335,0.0000921503,0.0000059693984,0.0009995062,0.00005965036,0.00007095364,0.000016390868,0.000022194248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047726952,0.000026625034,0.000020984275,0.000090935544,0.0019697999,0.00008301968,0.000028550694,0.0000648107,0.000013123454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028155248,0.0000025172274,0.00056004245,0.000001143286,0.00002009853,3.532991e-7,0.008187997,3.0767208e-7,0.0000023648647,0.9904658,0.00038729692,0.00036923436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034364976,0.000005405,0.00083289004,0.0000048048933,0.000017850645,0.0000020588523,0.050710063,0.000002516933,0.000048995862,0.12138422,0.82658315,0.00006441861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015149649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001141937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90768033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020022351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040263574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7687495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965653143","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748697748.003.0007","title":"Scottish Trusts in the Common Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Trust law; Common law; Creditor; Blind trust; Testamentary trust; Settlor; Position (finance); Law; Express trust; Voting trust; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.06781442915246685,"score_gpt":0.2820911261788428,"score_spread":0.21427669702637595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965653143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006919798,0.00008709983,0.0000063714124,0.0004928292,0.0001869895,0.00047427963,0.000060575396,0.000060809278,0.99856186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033153843,0.000066206296,0.000019411998,0.00017129758,0.00047200764,0.0000017335544,0.000013919588,0.0000117647605,0.96608984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988022,0.000070934955,0.00012927722,0.00026004858,0.00049489073,0.00024265512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991619,0.00012417749,0.000121198354,0.00037660074,0.00009394265,0.0001221593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005336019,0.00015830986,0.00020697368,0.000057079473,0.0005273117,0.00009310312,0.0009954553,0.00030663447,0.00013250939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007051214,0.00015153366,0.000100163634,0.00001591561,0.0005879181,0.00010577055,0.00020623438,0.0005074324,0.000009133957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008470038,0.000009074576,0.0000031430873,0.0000024133647,0.00001126826,0.00003578909,0.004138326,0.0000022369534,3.170546e-7,0.94211185,0.052851178,0.0008259116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001921235,0.000011366425,0.000003716586,0.000040051527,0.000041790212,7.7665555e-7,0.0008270888,0.000003142871,0.0000010887795,0.023695542,0.9750089,0.00017442871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01697212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013198464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9221577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023600414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001840673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98957396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965960295","doi":"10.7202/045721ar","title":"Crown Ownership of Water in situ in Common Law Canada : Public Trusts, Classical Trusts and Fiduciary Duties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Statutory law; Law; Legislation; Private law; Common law; Public law; Business; Argument (complex analysis); Civil law (Civil law); State (computer science); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Duty; Mathematics","score_opus":0.025613192125192114,"score_gpt":0.23995217233967792,"score_spread":0.2143389802144858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965960295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93234426,0.00004801878,0.000005725507,0.0026737733,0.00003139832,0.00012093056,0.00000762352,0.000012480856,0.06475577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983225,0.000019406869,0.00008061075,0.00038235952,0.000030958214,0.000019067593,0.0000061021383,0.0000069676107,0.0011320123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899775,0.00011662731,0.00020645026,0.00015945987,0.00016485303,0.00035486664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996006,0.00008351116,0.000040016752,0.00013458371,0.0000199258,0.00012136778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042614582,0.00007776115,0.0001683956,0.000058936428,0.00016442768,0.000031473694,0.00021535037,0.00015862256,0.00007177765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032529988,0.00006688475,0.00002596475,0.0001597335,0.0006426227,0.00014238492,0.000039301605,0.00028385644,0.0000015776911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002047386,0.00006240429,0.041762322,0.000018456429,0.000007139079,0.000017281847,0.028660867,0.0000013478851,0.00022440839,0.9261844,0.00021832656,0.002822557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013180785,0.000073586205,0.5221126,0.000071579874,0.00003187139,0.0000066039834,0.040191144,0.00009845223,0.00944203,0.24464247,0.18127702,0.00073453586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72841763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6815419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049632153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022378954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2733909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966575687","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpn073","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal confirms that irreparable harm must be demonstrated in injunction cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Harm; Damages; Interim; Federal court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Supreme court; Economics","score_opus":0.10254589870254925,"score_gpt":0.33497271280187485,"score_spread":0.23242681409932558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966575687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58961713,0.00042974428,0.0002217745,0.035672553,0.0004666701,0.0006352865,0.000018257633,0.00002885539,0.3729097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556804,0.0005531977,0.0004340538,0.0013255741,0.00016884039,0.000005361778,0.0000024156059,0.000012769726,0.0019297374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980437,0.00037153132,0.00056935445,0.00015778991,0.00051020074,0.00034737942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975286,0.00083493185,0.00049231004,0.0001277124,0.0007148376,0.00030158256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00125302,0.00013081182,0.0002791188,0.00013964248,0.0007693835,0.000107634274,0.00028580998,0.00013331755,0.0005063348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030934336,0.00009118652,0.00009571596,0.00044317284,0.00041237695,0.0011514119,0.000025033683,0.0006013601,0.000028624825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013339364,0.008329341,0.018374564,0.0002489509,0.0017458828,0.0064498396,0.3709444,0.004336579,0.013161822,0.112048015,0.42458904,0.026432196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049221754,0.00044727745,0.0002291675,0.00006148914,0.00004687676,0.0013382896,0.020552002,0.00024356433,0.0014746679,0.000083895706,0.9748459,0.00018466923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7069214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5295325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55025685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050530385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002378277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59175533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966818484","doi":"10.7202/043939ar","title":"La fiducie : réflexion sur la réception judiciaire d’un nouveau code.","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011358980030974837,"score_gpt":0.2652562665504538,"score_spread":0.25389728651947896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966818484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7085143,0.0022865485,0.0081068305,0.043307114,0.00035799947,0.00035773174,0.00010215564,0.00019817447,0.23676914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91785985,0.0014670567,0.0015078966,0.0013091412,0.0010503012,0.000041967076,0.00002635987,0.00003369308,0.07670374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797064,0.00035514042,0.00031469634,0.0003988904,0.00036978396,0.0005908529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988003,0.00037698058,0.0001647162,0.0003063132,0.00008275054,0.0002689533],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010115127,0.00020844446,0.0002265649,0.00006063976,0.0008806653,0.00016195179,0.0004044298,0.00073091633,0.0008287732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013240414,0.00024834523,0.00019573285,0.00049043546,0.0012888323,0.0004154037,0.00005465377,0.0007716618,0.0007064585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126557425,0.00021061461,0.0002602603,0.000026719312,0.000034542205,0.00001281403,0.02139058,0.0003267368,0.00026228256,0.70362824,0.009431085,0.2644035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003145422,0.00003084185,0.0024896592,0.000060888076,0.000076526645,0.00001907009,0.0022367898,0.001487139,0.00020086464,0.03600356,0.9567858,0.00029433568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003115892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003389314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001744416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036381203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967488272","doi":"10.1163/1573035053683209","title":"Rights of Private Property in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and in the Civil Code of Quebec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Political science; Law; Contradiction; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private property; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021656405054679508,"score_gpt":0.2652328119427474,"score_spread":0.2435764068880679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967488272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4644217,0.023111928,0.000035378645,0.051349603,0.000048629794,0.002457392,0.00008921342,0.000010263266,0.45847592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916878,0.007758369,0.000023846833,0.00038270195,0.0000365619,0.000003201637,0.0000018018342,0.0000028486706,0.00010291405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865663,0.000604683,0.0003435589,0.0000907301,0.00018975152,0.00011467188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995694,0.000034715922,0.00019149133,0.00016033184,0.000021840675,0.000022207823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010475897,0.000060669896,0.00016433197,0.0000075284593,0.00013658879,0.000019937761,0.00027047817,0.000013631586,0.000012710724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025565054,0.00002347258,0.00004480995,0.0001584594,0.00035989963,0.00006593927,0.000039280687,0.00007468345,7.0876615e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009262594,0.00013388752,0.0018026753,0.00094417343,0.000007014379,4.4792753e-7,0.009107252,0.000014235248,0.00017713588,0.9806363,0.00020181506,0.0069658007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030490453,0.000027633041,0.093999185,0.0026897877,0.000037155412,0.0000021971118,0.00038834027,0.00008385452,0.0001481256,0.0008634767,0.90136236,0.00009295256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033074182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11899019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009378322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033698896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89708596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19685341","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2611","title":"Book Review: Account of Profits, by Peter Devonshire","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.01449183770909468,"score_gpt":0.2923809933180419,"score_spread":0.2778891556089472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19685341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032879596,0.10434789,0.00016132968,0.02589861,0.0001216268,0.0005439627,0.000017795706,0.000029653067,0.86855036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8927498,0.057473674,0.0012216428,0.024499249,0.00063616823,0.000109658795,0.000009542462,0.000029878984,0.023270415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883944,0.00010213994,0.0003113177,0.00011338665,0.00037401437,0.00025970282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991676,0.000041947198,0.00022085627,0.00015859262,0.00023004785,0.00018095059],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004839866,0.000083122024,0.00016134295,0.000013948111,0.0006249665,0.00012033581,0.0003633035,0.000058711023,0.0044946354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048649406,0.000066117835,0.00009922782,0.00009540561,0.00016404029,0.0004998401,0.000041001378,0.00023906612,0.0002799501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.944459e-7,0.000045470715,0.00012777299,0.00004000659,0.000012948132,7.7763633e-7,0.00022525276,4.2152527e-7,0.00027927366,0.21460181,0.783086,0.0015792764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009158977,0.000014434659,0.00017115628,0.00017589118,0.00001834025,0.000008439288,0.00010366101,0.0000030512556,0.00016505404,0.0046430854,0.9945167,0.000088607885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016785992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061857426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89242095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005842746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010220685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969631755","doi":"10.7202/1007831ar","title":"L’arbitrage de griefs : un système de justice privé ou public ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Arbitrage; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.02401032820315206,"score_gpt":0.2750596641840929,"score_spread":0.2510493359809408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969631755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5368587,0.010864484,0.08922817,0.06559124,0.0013486972,0.0007043226,0.00014325356,0.00033375924,0.2949274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513402,0.000597171,0.004624913,0.002760635,0.0019273368,0.000082271625,0.000015050286,0.000042459178,0.038609955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969294,0.0003519732,0.00031549548,0.00030629634,0.00035376794,0.0017430878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799407,0.0003321091,0.00017471686,0.0003871022,0.00007704651,0.001034971],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017908183,0.00023064607,0.00024126837,0.00006969102,0.0012532151,0.0002447711,0.0006667994,0.0006454663,0.00050147093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045827933,0.00027299795,0.00019152148,0.0006995552,0.0009860112,0.0005736776,0.000081641956,0.0009857605,0.0004508161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038935295,0.00019510489,0.0034604203,0.00011943993,0.000055193355,0.000011412384,0.018545313,0.000027662481,0.00017783612,0.96274996,0.0016060525,0.013047718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029252373,0.00003097079,0.0162092,0.00005979699,0.0003972808,0.000061018185,0.0065519544,0.00071492605,0.00033906283,0.08682398,0.8880218,0.0004974716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002898089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007178156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8864158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037794411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006818476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969955699","doi":"10.5539/res.v6n1p83","title":"Expanding Democracy - Transferring the Crown Prerogative to Parliament","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Parliament; Realm; Sovereign immunity; Political science; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Democracy; Sociology; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.08517694946192185,"score_gpt":0.4004081026270228,"score_spread":0.315231153165101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969955699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035754237,0.16259664,0.0051659183,0.07631135,0.0002711944,0.0025761616,0.00001178895,0.00013652272,0.7171762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8795055,0.11770326,0.00033062894,0.0015792734,0.0001996592,0.000031801934,3.3338503e-7,0.000008540057,0.00064099825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887824,0.00045900155,0.00022927545,0.00012461451,0.0001732162,0.00013563214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940735,0.00021429724,0.000069853806,0.00017003014,0.00009480443,0.000043661414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018215035,0.0000675221,0.00018587621,0.0000108265485,0.0005763287,0.000017690054,0.00024981424,0.000004482393,0.000018517258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053369236,0.000040753373,0.00007217639,0.00017227835,0.00014702269,0.000055620538,0.00009335385,0.00005002882,0.00007528551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008280219,0.000114131355,0.00081101,0.0039035403,0.00033612645,0.0000017192393,0.15251659,0.000026613177,0.00048264477,0.4244535,0.025873661,0.3914722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048495684,0.0000264624,0.0017601431,0.002978232,0.000051259285,1.2654841e-7,0.0048081446,6.429372e-7,0.0000887066,0.00030697352,0.9898525,0.00007831399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035048433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046022502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9639788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026589978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011379735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44327128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970629872","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6296.2001.tb00042.x","title":"REGULATORY NEGOTIATION IN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE REFORM","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Management and Insurance Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Legislature; Regulatory reform; Compensation (psychology); Law reform; Legislative history; State (computer science); Tort; Business; Craft; Public administration; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.016166601228980403,"score_gpt":0.2970323972593048,"score_spread":0.2808657960303244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970629872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3185998,0.22174408,0.00013627658,0.0036000574,0.00015588208,0.0021167414,0.00001569792,0.00015819591,0.4534733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49214655,0.5061724,0.00012256969,0.00025810665,0.00003563876,0.00008782221,0.000002658469,0.000003920491,0.0011703137],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990048,0.00009791483,0.00026592263,0.00021814115,0.00020327038,0.00020998236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954283,0.000016962096,0.00013313322,0.00022404124,0.00002750171,0.000055515047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083106844,0.00008905379,0.00017659365,0.000046757796,0.0002704636,0.000036726397,0.00016153221,0.000034053373,0.00006052591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022523855,0.00007929113,0.000043272186,0.00054917746,0.000074960364,0.00032335118,0.000043430082,0.00009730172,0.000058971807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004120464,0.00006117166,0.23291299,0.0006121521,0.000011587491,0.0000039815504,0.000370868,0.000007347281,6.942886e-7,0.14168334,0.0010440479,0.6232877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010887641,0.0000043077516,0.41321835,0.000484494,0.000007794528,2.7575066e-7,0.00008375495,0.000013767445,3.0700764e-7,0.0010288939,0.5849739,0.00007531033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010982931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010081707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6232124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120662284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014758191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32333985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970855642","doi":"10.7202/042965ar","title":"La responsabilité civile délictuelle","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012544031755823401,"score_gpt":0.27804312895904154,"score_spread":0.2654990972032181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970855642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56307524,0.0028368556,0.0026609744,0.03505368,0.00020140427,0.00025096224,0.00005855076,0.000114201335,0.39574814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7392228,0.00053517777,0.0021966316,0.0010591756,0.00076796,0.000038056613,0.0000048156153,0.000021809135,0.25615358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998223,0.00037959678,0.00024786126,0.0003219105,0.0002650431,0.0005625683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862546,0.0006029039,0.00008283718,0.0003521125,0.00004670444,0.0002900117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011443212,0.0001519523,0.00017313786,0.00004648112,0.0006907999,0.00009880409,0.00042045832,0.000508321,0.001857708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023281091,0.0001801174,0.00016830339,0.0004646916,0.0017098322,0.0002087097,0.0000519132,0.0006300401,0.0011379817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011286735,0.00012210921,0.00028155284,0.000016928836,0.000018226605,0.0000052118453,0.014986339,0.00013604095,0.0001416768,0.8105429,0.006911456,0.16682631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017701558,0.000022399166,0.001332068,0.000022697164,0.00003367159,0.000008881721,0.0028061008,0.0005953797,0.00018193474,0.023032174,0.9715781,0.00020955334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015766114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002568395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96466666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001387583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002270615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971069086","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1013","title":"Property Transferred in Breach of Trust","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Jurisdiction; Conceptual framework; Position (finance); Trust law; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Focus (optics); Relation (database); Express trust; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.0179607744056398,"score_gpt":0.3344342826251214,"score_spread":0.3164735082194816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971069086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3446127,0.001221091,0.00037744403,0.0035324083,0.0001121933,0.0003194141,0.000046116897,0.000054972148,0.64972365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977201,0.00083253597,0.00034217833,0.00005224883,0.00007023467,0.000018947636,0.0000030121876,0.0000024411886,0.0009582852],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924463,0.000039777533,0.00017718606,0.00014669006,0.00018967631,0.00020204489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974746,0.000014790991,0.000036562556,0.00010474914,0.000037965936,0.000058464015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015581406,0.000060498,0.000117362586,0.000014905309,0.00011564028,0.000017667759,0.00022027217,0.000040360203,0.000070177215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027212942,0.00004458161,0.000040791518,0.00045684862,0.00019832555,0.00021778834,0.000012907517,0.00004848061,0.000016691327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001149051,0.0005365117,0.32795238,0.00003923273,0.000012417635,0.000014100372,0.00512014,0.00016884813,0.00017103934,0.2946494,0.0007438209,0.37047723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023143733,0.000018510815,0.02845865,0.000013951426,0.0000042804827,0.0000011967402,0.0013237299,0.000017758019,0.000036495894,0.0059265047,0.9638779,0.00008954863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006432591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018356916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007820148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009285961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972550411","doi":"10.7202/1026956ar","title":"Les associations contractuelles en droit québécois et comparé. Analyse critique et perspectives de réforme","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02076838336259991,"score_gpt":0.32804973176334223,"score_spread":0.30728134840074234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972550411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64824146,0.0031079582,0.0187834,0.1044036,0.00020787143,0.0006234241,0.00050155417,0.00021865737,0.2239121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847252,0.0026013043,0.0024498424,0.0013782925,0.000834045,0.000091600414,0.00006819435,0.00004227867,0.007809241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969947,0.0009871065,0.00048126504,0.00047736597,0.00029106444,0.00076854735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726975,0.00139834,0.00032359015,0.00039052294,0.00026092533,0.00035684553],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022829836,0.00021808532,0.00049751217,0.00010480866,0.00073076924,0.00027110506,0.0005392078,0.00038503716,0.00032981546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010203696,0.00033441372,0.00037394415,0.00051254174,0.00039947545,0.0004979344,0.000079034246,0.00069311657,0.00019801846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004908929,0.00031780012,0.012651023,0.000045885736,0.00011290906,0.0000048497645,0.048947927,0.0005664789,0.000221021,0.9339197,0.00091983745,0.0022876477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077858684,0.00012778045,0.25669447,0.00028583163,0.0005110795,0.000035895548,0.053616755,0.011279725,0.0001802988,0.38492844,0.2905518,0.0010093306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12874313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19123131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54899126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017290665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006601435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972694932","doi":"10.7202/042983ar","title":"L'Avant-projet de Loi et la protection des consommateurs","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023086532081036556,"score_gpt":0.296225045160139,"score_spread":0.2731385130791024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972694932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79056466,0.0010119785,0.030202964,0.022559943,0.00022046264,0.00059442787,0.000056576486,0.00018812786,0.15460083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8886039,0.0010963636,0.007430495,0.0011821737,0.00047188922,0.00012040465,0.000006599232,0.000029189321,0.10105897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983748,0.00040111627,0.00020885601,0.00026187437,0.00019783001,0.0005555092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992823,0.00013756267,0.000110000925,0.00018630383,0.00005904829,0.0002247853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010422213,0.00015183845,0.00015109786,0.000049081715,0.0007324733,0.00017564103,0.00026533642,0.00041398112,0.00031330463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014027511,0.00017652247,0.00011327451,0.00027396937,0.0016799592,0.00031283774,0.000033866967,0.0006081175,0.00039936337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001229467,0.00012656911,0.00076728914,0.00005038784,0.000028961698,0.000007099311,0.022336924,0.0004045084,0.000890267,0.80038637,0.000945125,0.17404422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002520188,0.00003735924,0.0027303025,0.000060734965,0.000049300277,0.000042246957,0.0036369478,0.0013092748,0.0009544623,0.06961631,0.9210702,0.00024084543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041554472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041774213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92012507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013023549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000291109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7198377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973159428","doi":"10.7202/042284ar","title":"La notion d'enrichissement sans cause en droit administratif québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Law; Commercial law; Administrative law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Public law; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Restitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.01147361724020431,"score_gpt":0.28414371244197667,"score_spread":0.2726700952017724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973159428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77467,0.0000779092,0.006953585,0.00805659,0.00006186132,0.00029988898,0.000024585173,0.0001772551,0.20967834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98691845,0.00014759095,0.0016436641,0.0007019154,0.00040385398,0.000060667215,0.000012700588,0.00001565059,0.0100955255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987702,0.00012390189,0.00019719213,0.00022825031,0.0003434847,0.00033700888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992941,0.00016494378,0.000075933014,0.00021675968,0.000050338993,0.00019792462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069432845,0.0001066034,0.000114009104,0.000048483595,0.0005107046,0.000106628635,0.0002839453,0.00022994846,0.00019797609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013804565,0.00012166254,0.00008391209,0.0002062944,0.00027164933,0.00015878088,0.000021149584,0.00031867225,0.00012509151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007039707,0.00012513522,0.00054479536,0.000008109193,0.000028269136,0.000008459626,0.040514287,0.00007638022,0.00055441895,0.91491634,0.0010989163,0.042117875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021729567,0.000031519532,0.007704048,0.0000117657855,0.000045757763,0.0000054808106,0.008958205,0.00016162479,0.0004385007,0.008583004,0.97360224,0.00024058006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009450978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095697105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9725033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014911245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003364912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973233396","doi":"10.7202/042245ar","title":"Les trois phénomènes de la mutation des biens meubles en biens immeubles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Supreme court; Law; Corporation; Order (exchange); Humanities; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.012268165207678195,"score_gpt":0.29966839222632624,"score_spread":0.28740022701864804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973233396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92897755,0.00031044515,0.013142946,0.002122823,0.000030248735,0.0001905213,0.000027241022,0.0001931858,0.055005047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98180574,0.0003596919,0.011481921,0.00024696506,0.00041469786,0.000063100095,0.000014554204,0.000024244371,0.005589084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853235,0.00026115857,0.00020920318,0.00025247977,0.00023623646,0.0005085481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989566,0.0005041257,0.00009213776,0.00017865792,0.0000690247,0.00019941569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009048869,0.00014018986,0.00015094281,0.0001045464,0.0011850137,0.00021146916,0.0003420001,0.0002892504,0.00013564026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029578316,0.00014682126,0.00011706856,0.00032544436,0.001058379,0.00028103986,0.00002983501,0.0002849909,0.00005492135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015119546,0.0001269037,0.008151869,0.000024309184,0.00004615904,0.000011329896,0.09070602,0.00096388074,0.0038289982,0.7421671,0.0006075334,0.15335076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008380019,0.00006440522,0.0708123,0.000061324194,0.00013760569,0.000045050423,0.043021075,0.0016128534,0.0076456917,0.11891249,0.75609016,0.0007590691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008104787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008448852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7554826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010765343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017197107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974703919","doi":"10.7202/037736ar","title":"Amputer la responsabilité contractuelle ? Une tourmente inutile et néfaste","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.00977293843796278,"score_gpt":0.2831949002872897,"score_spread":0.27342196184932693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974703919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61254746,0.0013904482,0.009427638,0.103584655,0.00035391122,0.0005194584,0.00009665659,0.00013742258,0.27194235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8395147,0.0004491021,0.0017929944,0.0053149187,0.00033430097,0.000021517011,0.000011335001,0.000017317549,0.15254384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979393,0.0004621657,0.00030946906,0.00037230394,0.00030092147,0.0006158771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985883,0.00056637323,0.0001300845,0.0003554106,0.00006503556,0.00029478603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001175403,0.00019632246,0.00024152729,0.000051145867,0.0005354838,0.00018418454,0.000399341,0.0004385944,0.0003149197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001552363,0.00022065712,0.00018514167,0.0005222683,0.0009907123,0.00027572422,0.000036177786,0.0007134459,0.00021747481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038810806,0.00021155056,0.00012508067,0.000011045645,0.000024734267,0.00002416018,0.01388329,0.0001032009,0.00038117074,0.8935479,0.007168394,0.084480695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003887382,0.00009787283,0.008240027,0.000046894038,0.000041700085,0.00001586825,0.0017730312,0.00035579334,0.00014781955,0.098580055,0.8900632,0.00024895818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018148505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087423134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8828949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007456609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021320624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8998136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976456838","doi":"10.7202/1027601ar","title":"Responsabilité civile : les municipalités sont-elles en état de siège ?","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025166574549879077,"score_gpt":0.2946265836838226,"score_spread":0.2694600091339435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976456838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8192385,0.0022744492,0.0017351994,0.046324532,0.00034495592,0.00048883085,0.00010356877,0.00015928672,0.12933066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92445755,0.0011557891,0.0020333624,0.00041738438,0.0015632069,0.000110793975,0.000014613075,0.000045692075,0.070201635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965985,0.0010524065,0.00045433093,0.0005080439,0.00026191983,0.0011248153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719477,0.0013260816,0.00016783629,0.00074431906,0.00008501646,0.00048195609],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028414645,0.00020230915,0.00037163592,0.000064821994,0.0007663994,0.00016735803,0.0008376079,0.00042372945,0.0006756801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008465273,0.00030279785,0.0002876864,0.00048969773,0.0006343754,0.00029903124,0.00017983088,0.00049270695,0.00052411883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017210688,0.00018750176,0.006227921,0.00015462236,0.000029484261,0.000007656724,0.009580492,0.00032247967,0.0005502205,0.9298025,0.0012197379,0.051900215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002910832,0.00007594464,0.0069599957,0.00021575972,0.00009674571,0.000020993552,0.004487604,0.00684544,0.00028724773,0.13934201,0.84093547,0.00044170866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011698619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012709829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8397157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007647976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031309665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976673022","doi":"10.7202/042672ar","title":"La réalisation de garanties du fiduciaire et les syndiqués","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Deed; Debtor; Law; Settlor; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Creditor; Philosophy; Debt; Linguistics","score_opus":0.012092098730171773,"score_gpt":0.2775392191176109,"score_spread":0.2654471203874392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976673022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8531522,0.00014383216,0.008570745,0.017445907,0.000029593664,0.00012845361,0.000011287035,0.00014331887,0.120374665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902772,0.0003001815,0.001626264,0.00081163994,0.00028194985,0.000028154864,0.000008051948,0.000011310014,0.0066552954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918056,0.00017280066,0.00011186572,0.00013624514,0.0001592941,0.00023923512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954605,0.00016525004,0.000052669693,0.00011967794,0.00003195787,0.00008438281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007852808,0.00007095138,0.00008147303,0.000037119247,0.0006146067,0.00010807704,0.00019591306,0.00020520223,0.00010263637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016606225,0.00007736473,0.0000621265,0.00012399252,0.000357481,0.00016651825,0.000016545673,0.00025067807,0.000042731634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003866395,0.000029907336,0.0029258565,0.0000072340313,0.0000094885245,0.0000027064882,0.035191227,0.00019837642,0.00014376419,0.93840104,0.002090653,0.02099586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015262459,0.000009432426,0.017954689,0.000016554142,0.000020817692,0.0000065387426,0.008290034,0.0003863746,0.00030751506,0.023867348,0.94881856,0.00016952906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040322444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054388326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004162301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014398093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6095574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976984184","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttu018","title":"Equity in Australian estate litigation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Constructive trust; Estate; Fiduciary; Equity (law); Estoppel; Business; Undue influence; Law; Liability; Estate planning; Legislature; Breach of contract; Law and economics; Duty; Unjust enrichment; Economics; Political science; Damages; Doctrine; Restitution","score_opus":0.054584665973872556,"score_gpt":0.39832812727752687,"score_spread":0.3437434613036543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976984184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6325371,0.0000066762823,0.000096262476,0.006896638,0.00010928099,0.00022363348,0.000005453001,0.00010106429,0.3600239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932158,0.00003476063,0.00043969858,0.00013973698,0.00020931814,0.0000310077,0.000006871651,0.0000075731964,0.0059152287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989262,0.00012708805,0.00018925553,0.00018897436,0.00023805944,0.0003303942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995282,0.00007978143,0.00005977303,0.00017483163,0.000035405876,0.00012198333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072712847,0.00007828736,0.00010874333,0.000052728657,0.00025433974,0.000104808205,0.00024702,0.00007773764,0.0003204723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012479309,0.00007781813,0.000038259703,0.00021907497,0.00015416903,0.00022634795,0.000051581348,0.000121891455,0.00019874664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007812181,0.00008124683,0.015770733,0.000018936096,0.000004787987,0.0000014687412,0.012494984,0.00014673016,0.00024572638,0.81535006,0.0011385431,0.15473895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038623367,0.000027732985,0.10989516,0.000026675925,0.000009560742,4.507539e-7,0.0022194306,0.00034183732,0.0004083651,0.03769742,0.84876055,0.00022655995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006733231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012332715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84762204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001135265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008068725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977832111","doi":"10.1002/iir.156","title":"The ‘fresh start’ for individual debtors: social, moral and practical issues","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fresh Start; Debtor; Debt; Position (finance); Start up; Natural (archaeology); Business; Creditor; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; History; Business administration; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.22339467601409949,"score_gpt":0.46337067311235436,"score_spread":0.23997599709825487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977832111","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01936866,0.14634047,0.0007728813,0.7592308,0.0011007898,0.0028408288,0.0002808125,0.0001687583,0.06989599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4148136,0.5620137,0.0045727813,0.0071198763,0.002794693,0.0008816472,0.000086118926,0.000029197989,0.007688392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902457,0.0000750794,0.00023115057,0.00014613381,0.00036152604,0.00016151635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927425,0.00028083054,0.00010960299,0.00008395693,0.00019555946,0.000055806693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006663249,0.00006915502,0.000113828966,0.000013696547,0.0011678375,0.00009616285,0.00024550926,0.0000393747,0.000109161054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062941166,0.000050713898,0.00008052423,0.00008711177,0.00031011985,0.00023350792,0.00006437248,0.00009772078,0.000027187847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047989543,0.00005761054,0.00092996715,0.000043110584,0.000044890836,0.0000019817173,0.0013223238,7.582049e-8,0.0000039299753,0.79752314,0.19139603,0.008672143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007715711,0.000012792975,0.0017693661,0.00007361844,0.00002000891,0.0000053410067,0.00018829107,0.000008636533,0.00000392065,0.0066217966,0.99115163,0.000067461595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002876533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032143516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7997556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041111078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015392296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89821804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978273071","doi":"10.7202/1026130ar","title":"Tort Law, Risk, and Technological Innovation in England","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Action (physics); Function (biology); Industrial Revolution; Technological change; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.023972221821319688,"score_gpt":0.29210815694112313,"score_spread":0.26813593511980344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978273071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4765576,0.000024859022,0.00057402323,0.0031528408,0.000071095834,0.00010427764,0.000007080384,0.00004565466,0.5194626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896735,0.0000668709,0.00058882055,0.00018185632,0.0001367932,0.0000042417846,5.7693416e-7,0.0000028216864,0.000050684353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993717,0.000097292104,0.0001740315,0.00008538348,0.00013187643,0.00013969565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996955,0.00006364591,0.000084517,0.000057840225,0.000054066422,0.00004443644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014408656,0.000041411888,0.00006799817,0.000038156064,0.0019903851,0.00006201416,0.000101852864,0.000077597324,0.000031496755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019661509,0.000033390777,0.000012501839,0.0002306363,0.00020264275,0.00013018739,0.000028744538,0.0002758815,0.000007995875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019461497,0.000015765028,0.0028156047,5.356887e-7,0.0000012682214,9.295696e-7,0.00011945506,0.000003124982,0.00003475568,0.9766843,0.000009426946,0.02031292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020954943,0.000016353111,0.0036946028,0.0000048535007,0.0000022481322,0.000006285778,0.00013022072,0.000026081409,0.00007507715,0.043087162,0.9526987,0.000048884634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033264745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048597068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95268923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041115425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040764057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978819111","doi":"10.4000/chs.1246","title":"Whigs, Tories and Scottish Legal Reform, c.1785-1832","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Crime Histoire et Sociétés","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hatch (Canada); Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Law; Political science; Statute; Law reform; Scots law; Politics; Scots; Shadow (psychology); Legal history; Common law; History; Sources of law; Art","score_opus":0.13095142306151608,"score_gpt":0.39122561753829616,"score_spread":0.2602741944767801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978819111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014083991,0.02409994,0.00010818174,0.025543304,0.0072104144,0.00037595886,0.00010430114,0.00018657534,0.9282873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74961674,0.0022975344,0.001489557,0.0012732855,0.0009659202,0.00006117103,0.00002016479,0.00004893628,0.24422668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979433,0.00019977037,0.0003936702,0.00051229756,0.00035994116,0.00059101987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882317,0.00007094811,0.00019449994,0.00040432534,0.00016519961,0.00034188217],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005694035,0.00028405897,0.00034673582,0.000042389438,0.0019295887,0.00016638073,0.0004193265,0.0003442116,0.0037458208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008589412,0.000303616,0.0001614704,0.00030809882,0.002307805,0.0010367272,0.00021395202,0.0004518395,0.0003284886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010874954,0.00015882726,0.0001510354,0.000054346125,0.000035388948,0.000010954681,0.020339778,1.02808166e-7,0.00006669285,0.91520065,0.034934327,0.029037049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026847355,0.00006919379,0.0026790898,0.000059075068,0.00009962821,0.000008897176,0.009341113,0.000006271538,0.0001247368,0.020069025,0.96688706,0.00038742894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04422705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026356718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9319527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000759342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039982918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979119494","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0024","title":"Office Politics (Again)!","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Order (exchange); Normative; State (computer science); Political science; Commission; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Law; Public good; Public administration; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.020364362019015543,"score_gpt":0.2768114866713353,"score_spread":0.2564471246523198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979119494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4680513,0.018145528,0.00021216148,0.18341565,0.0025547366,0.00036546975,0.00065559836,0.000019101652,0.32658044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94478977,0.0020450256,0.0012995672,0.016159749,0.0033672322,0.000003954473,0.000010205726,0.000040531868,0.032283958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754244,0.00015045726,0.0006497048,0.00027643135,0.00015484316,0.0012260962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952813,0.00025368197,0.00041207607,0.00024493906,0.00048034996,0.0033276964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012939655,0.0002545747,0.00047183782,0.00005434604,0.0014738232,0.00024774385,0.00048756442,0.00040605752,0.00051996333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012493212,0.00031056986,0.0005056541,0.00032516787,0.0015587779,0.00061234174,0.000027171023,0.0008458443,0.000032877644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011292718,0.00002242327,0.00006230308,0.00005389677,0.00010468634,0.000036594553,0.054481048,0.00007613279,0.0000069864222,0.9266535,0.012938717,0.0055625993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039817457,0.00006676896,0.00031421162,0.00014971377,0.00015600874,0.00016948686,0.020671973,0.00018555882,0.0000066379052,0.013322084,0.96422774,0.0003316622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34269634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8879662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.951289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023641144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003674065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979206386","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.603","title":"IDEAS, INTERESTS, INSTITUTIONS AND THE HISTORY OF CANADIAN BANKRUPTCY LAW, 1867–1880","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Legislation; Scholarship; Law; Creditor; Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Federalism; Repeal; State (computer science); Sociology; Economics; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.02171454587795497,"score_gpt":0.24027734574756968,"score_spread":0.21856279986961472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979206386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03193505,0.0006015084,0.00006408301,0.0041053486,0.0004190699,0.00008926655,0.000017774579,0.0000062577988,0.96276164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967186,0.0003566696,0.000377317,0.00010213122,0.00007306507,5.175116e-8,5.969587e-7,0.0000015073593,0.0023700693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995927,0.000055601537,0.00007803176,0.000054729884,0.00011142998,0.000107499916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994764,0.000038805418,0.0000938498,0.00009777199,0.00011195958,0.0001812248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034471066,0.000036265876,0.00008123849,0.000022674887,0.0009013283,0.000015040402,0.0002877389,0.000048457445,0.00077955343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025615262,0.000032172815,0.000055011675,0.000027112592,0.0017490216,0.0002947786,0.000035665103,0.00016264728,0.000002151097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008767176,0.000010398514,0.0001073065,0.0000013752136,0.00001190467,0.0000017827647,0.008968416,0.0000011644015,0.00004842982,0.9875117,0.0028704065,0.00045836787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030113876,0.0000068471945,0.0010401938,0.000007302255,0.000021596128,0.000004585316,0.005261503,0.0000074213995,0.0000019172683,0.0014467915,0.991864,0.000036674835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98899364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003962916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006346198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85355633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980459580","doi":"10.7202/043056ar","title":"Former corporate managers, fiduciary obligations, and the public policy in favor of competition","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Damages; Obligation; Business; Competition (biology); Doctrine; Supreme court; Equity (law); Corporate law; Law and economics; Law; Accounting; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.01572433032665396,"score_gpt":0.2622032981354559,"score_spread":0.24647896780880194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980459580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9017691,0.00017242636,0.0018304788,0.050258882,0.000016387969,0.0003081268,0.00001630089,0.000025390098,0.045602877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964052,0.0003648154,0.0005786867,0.0007509881,0.00010876794,0.000030314219,0.000009887823,0.000004391559,0.0017469428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939364,0.000085698084,0.00014460001,0.00009228557,0.00011807268,0.00016572434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995874,0.00011375287,0.0001105541,0.00010763652,0.000028260934,0.00005238131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006072674,0.00004544093,0.00008545959,0.00008891416,0.00030467595,0.000053416647,0.00014492388,0.000069612055,0.000020532367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011259712,0.0000390885,0.000031931148,0.0003866089,0.0007613599,0.00017993445,0.000019581912,0.0001315865,0.000008246113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044194976,0.000015766169,0.00174252,0.0000046581017,0.00000451975,2.405492e-7,0.0039834245,0.000015325251,0.000032304557,0.98598486,0.00013195019,0.008080016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001364765,0.0000144911655,0.056491908,0.000028492095,0.000023706021,0.00000314533,0.009563647,0.0013200892,0.00014891865,0.67568153,0.25514722,0.00021209974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030579702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006258869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31030333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023385111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010609875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46227568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980917744","doi":"10.7202/042799ar","title":"La cession générale de créances commerciales à titre de garantie comme contrat de « fiducia » en droit québécois, français et anglais","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; Payment; Creditor; Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Political science; Debt; Humanities; Law and economics; Law; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.015363789891329409,"score_gpt":0.29512054892555173,"score_spread":0.2797567590342223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980917744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90783894,0.00081356993,0.008493726,0.011683211,0.000048620568,0.00026411613,0.00007293484,0.00018745978,0.07059745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881097,0.0009979327,0.0040919855,0.0042192116,0.00044196297,0.000061247,0.000023905197,0.00003082157,0.00202323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980309,0.00044856174,0.00025826937,0.00028251956,0.0002720718,0.00070766493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869645,0.0005635601,0.00012342661,0.00026585633,0.00005337532,0.00029734737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013429429,0.0001728372,0.00026215156,0.0000682613,0.0009485479,0.00018301918,0.00059916027,0.00044844564,0.00015843354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019517122,0.00019895322,0.0001505148,0.00026321787,0.0006624304,0.0002734411,0.000048247977,0.0006314287,0.000054873002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007930459,0.00044356388,0.098760195,0.00007726904,0.00009784211,0.00005077483,0.22413114,0.00038144545,0.003650417,0.58210564,0.0141177885,0.07610463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008069583,0.000038724622,0.079505734,0.00011584751,0.000088633285,0.000020836367,0.012092239,0.0007182165,0.0020387406,0.0420329,0.86200327,0.00053788006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06376842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14112012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8478855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010019436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058529834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.942466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981953899","doi":"10.7202/1017518ar","title":"Private Rights to Public Property: The Evolution of Common Property in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Property rights; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Property law; Government (linguistics); Intangible property; Common law; Political science; Common property; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026804891793771348,"score_gpt":0.25307801412567693,"score_spread":0.22627312233190558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981953899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3890552,0.000041292275,0.00003572261,0.09007074,0.00023027834,0.0010634762,0.000016475791,0.00001670448,0.5194701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988498,0.000005345155,0.00009652976,0.0002814179,0.00007442693,0.00003293884,3.3664932e-7,0.0000040728073,0.000655141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989321,0.00015138774,0.00023999745,0.00008511128,0.0003373003,0.0002540755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994348,0.000028441606,0.00009652395,0.00013642415,0.00015129341,0.00015249397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004430656,0.00005611975,0.00009661144,0.000024916872,0.002193652,0.000074176605,0.00039949818,0.00002536805,0.00015930153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036796337,0.00002325534,0.00002610369,0.00026996306,0.0000824079,0.00026792396,0.000054695858,0.00019187428,0.00002491894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043185905,0.00007980556,0.0053471867,0.000004180865,0.000011570689,0.0000024073304,0.0005760825,0.00008041507,0.00018878745,0.9824798,0.0042830673,0.0069423458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008209189,0.000013014154,0.007537916,0.0000148611425,0.0000022923766,0.0000035986359,0.00059681974,0.00009144787,0.00008226289,0.0030632862,0.98845387,0.000058569738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99657714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010195985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000244561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982176569","doi":"10.1093/tandt/7.8.8","title":"Canadian Taxation of Offshore Trusts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.022867585446724657,"score_gpt":0.30267023963433065,"score_spread":0.27980265418760597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982176569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6612479,0.00010977452,0.00004676107,0.0052055693,0.00014318961,0.00030815296,0.000027467611,0.000066727014,0.33284444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990377,0.00013073809,0.00026568046,0.00018043326,0.00024433268,0.000025633564,0.000014176873,0.000012147416,0.008749846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998835,0.00006801038,0.00023900102,0.00019224596,0.0002931792,0.000372513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913,0.000054133576,0.00017396519,0.00024314257,0.00011997853,0.00027874912],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031236277,0.00010004004,0.0001539167,0.0001266771,0.00043031786,0.00005087809,0.00031547446,0.00011976246,0.0015342751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014080474,0.00009894139,0.00007124679,0.00039446403,0.00016008478,0.0001955873,0.000020635942,0.000102465616,0.00012943025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002503292,0.0001250078,0.1641333,0.000022280803,0.000041875657,0.000012651223,0.019785807,0.0001244803,0.000259357,0.7409072,0.0076765977,0.06688641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002455166,0.000025070121,0.11897743,0.000017794302,0.00002533839,0.0000024173012,0.0036324544,0.00011146903,0.00022469273,0.003952018,0.8725871,0.00019871563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42910618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.750849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8649105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022660503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053640973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982786921","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0016","title":"The Idea of Consideration","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Doctrine; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Epistemology; Control (management); Contrast (vision); Law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03285581476177582,"score_gpt":0.2494688006652572,"score_spread":0.21661298590348138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982786921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029914243,0.00022351519,0.00082304515,0.0007475578,0.00008023202,0.00005514142,0.0000029116748,0.000005598821,0.96814775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980178,0.00032020145,0.00087334047,0.000010983639,0.000029173676,1.15832615e-8,9.6275905e-8,7.4550655e-7,0.00074763654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997035,0.000048741604,0.00005915467,0.000026266885,0.00010398498,0.000058351223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964136,0.00003683888,0.00010707135,0.000052269395,0.00012312969,0.00003933846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026220953,0.00001732317,0.000038069058,0.000002493413,0.0010434105,0.000009900316,0.00015274793,0.00001957612,0.00059227785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014169277,0.000014648737,0.000038291724,0.00001036743,0.00028256542,0.00019855097,0.000017557746,0.00003586694,0.0000023028397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009541095,0.000014221257,0.00028277637,5.319577e-7,0.000009925134,6.65699e-7,0.011337775,7.969788e-7,0.00006898172,0.9862513,0.00061526493,0.0014082511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026815984,0.000046990735,0.009585188,0.000010563629,0.000029139766,0.0000028983015,0.05817419,0.000014719707,0.00033132758,0.015096626,0.9163818,0.000058394835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1684138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4350659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97115463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055387824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062594074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8371238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983153865","doi":"10.1017/s0008197300250101","title":"<scp>FOR LOVE OR MONEY? DEPENDENT CARERS AND FAMILY PROVISION</scp>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Settlement (finance); Daughter; Damages; Entitlement (fair division); Law; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Estate planning; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Payment; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; History","score_opus":0.025309965010872532,"score_gpt":0.2971921425248232,"score_spread":0.27188217751395066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983153865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.660632,0.0007823945,0.00036346837,0.007663708,0.00019725574,0.0006642392,0.00006648456,0.000036941332,0.32959348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682253,0.0008188551,0.00023809278,0.0011232375,0.0007243692,0.000014012233,0.000001600606,0.000013622649,0.028840883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989425,0.000089458605,0.00019236217,0.00014098528,0.00030849475,0.0003261829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923116,0.00024919145,0.00008365377,0.00014745427,0.0000845289,0.00020402031],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007300785,0.00009295075,0.00011517292,0.00001530967,0.0014748778,0.00032933225,0.0003305299,0.000056939585,0.000053630494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000624185,0.000056282915,0.00007020381,0.00010417552,0.00025208536,0.000191536,0.00003170574,0.0002286267,0.00008865142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014264318,0.00023012656,0.0005581313,0.000032254236,0.00017224488,0.000052437466,0.03199932,0.00035400837,0.0014018506,0.69666356,0.15930352,0.10908989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003794591,0.000056143508,0.0012630603,0.000013286327,0.000034395005,0.000046707202,0.007973916,0.00010200759,0.00009801052,0.0009978252,0.98898256,0.00005260237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002061408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014634922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8296791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007196408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014517881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984276272","doi":"10.7202/050078ar","title":"Interest Arbitration in Ontario Hospitals: Result of an Attitude Survey of Union and Management Officials","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law","score_opus":0.0755882254909491,"score_gpt":0.32661575642287366,"score_spread":0.25102753093192454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984276272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97828555,0.00004148396,0.0001222119,0.0008538488,0.000018454057,0.00027058445,0.000015668213,0.000009109609,0.02038306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818105,0.00008196482,0.00073802593,0.000009292529,0.00001866498,0.000008230217,0.000037318103,0.0000033153417,0.00092216284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920094,0.00015740821,0.00031516614,0.00011923746,0.0001209141,0.00008634125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995145,0.0001078104,0.00013555131,0.00012945694,0.000076460754,0.00003622925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009082864,0.000049755,0.00009732592,0.000096484684,0.00011236241,0.000017796798,0.000100583646,0.00011165039,0.000037238377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098388606,0.00005209389,0.000013529034,0.0003150903,0.00012009251,0.00020591303,0.000028994249,0.00013437629,0.0000031345232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020418775,0.000409598,0.3629114,0.000004085231,0.00003094964,4.97204e-7,0.011749759,0.002228422,0.000117129945,0.5959195,0.00026484858,0.02634342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020337415,0.000029154296,0.9778629,0.000040625124,0.000010654384,7.917226e-8,0.0015503861,0.00015754999,0.00020221222,0.00038054807,0.019495716,0.00006681895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19102564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8682561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6772305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010537307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017617228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8143614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985312042","doi":"10.3138/utlj.041813","title":"REFLECTIONS ON THE STATE AS FIDUCIARY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Sovereignty; Legitimacy; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Statutory interpretation; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.0305442363649234,"score_gpt":0.30412674739813045,"score_spread":0.2735825110332071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985312042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049664225,0.000036868056,0.0001208994,0.010280865,0.000073813,0.000092087685,0.0000029880584,0.000012211926,0.93971604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98673046,0.00025970663,0.00024277353,0.00027317135,0.00008708415,1.2593664e-7,2.269455e-7,0.000001856042,0.012404576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999564,0.000079984406,0.00004828447,0.000049645798,0.00015393512,0.000104141385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960804,0.00005975415,0.00006509427,0.000084099294,0.00010329732,0.0000797228],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019162506,0.000029825456,0.00004124614,0.0000054822303,0.0018699118,0.000044906898,0.00024473786,0.000021789572,0.0059940484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000154201,0.00002407085,0.000052419677,0.000025624553,0.00017370458,0.00031201175,0.000025615087,0.000102942286,0.00014655148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059468425,0.00004172927,0.000024001758,4.7673524e-7,0.00001924816,0.0000015212789,0.013681999,0.000022422068,0.00013640689,0.969867,0.014029917,0.002169339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008159561,0.000034275283,0.0012365412,0.0000067290134,0.000006817438,0.0000018487242,0.025068812,0.000007817072,0.000026127034,0.015848594,0.95763797,0.000042870717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43152466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29608467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9540184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017604504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069350404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985338100","doi":"10.1111/1467-6478.00238","title":"Woe Unto You, Judges: or How Reading Frankfurter and Greene, <i>The Labor Injunction,</i> Ruined Me as a Labour Lawyer and Made Me as an Academic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03024942609389151,"score_gpt":0.3070784440875099,"score_spread":0.27682901799361836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985338100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9469746,0.0012233567,0.000030689887,0.046378728,0.00009582546,0.00015465285,0.000014105023,0.000019762863,0.005108306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751746,0.0072463355,0.00038688572,0.008206604,0.0008111837,0.000005863101,6.9273995e-7,0.000012814832,0.008154998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989364,0.00010818905,0.00023780405,0.0001675084,0.00031668314,0.00023338394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916196,0.00012852995,0.00020707135,0.00010643945,0.00014857756,0.0002474061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008883907,0.00011992024,0.0002002457,0.000015181069,0.001129127,0.00027808466,0.00017388833,0.00019352736,0.00013097229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006304219,0.00007619922,0.00007847604,0.00016960232,0.0003996602,0.00068471784,0.000048723046,0.00045687106,0.000004044967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116806135,0.00017350668,0.017104125,0.00008097763,0.00032014403,0.00001621109,0.17988512,0.0000028584766,0.0073168497,0.7616503,0.028127188,0.0052058618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010521407,0.00022587876,0.009259984,0.000050065733,0.00012780253,0.000103393984,0.024347603,0.00010702058,0.00013423515,0.011921896,0.9524281,0.0002418711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009011146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040606744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9243009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042464853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059268117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8684446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987155948","doi":"10.7202/1000626ar","title":"Some Australian Reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Political science; Statute; Common law; Misconduct; Liability","score_opus":0.18454920957132986,"score_gpt":0.3810247983716258,"score_spread":0.19647558880029592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987155948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005147114,0.00002025168,0.000026336053,0.0040804264,0.00045026428,0.00008937185,0.000022895283,0.00006388705,0.99009943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941922,0.00013555185,0.0007782661,0.00041136277,0.0007214116,0.000008760228,8.185988e-7,0.000010039635,0.0037415922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990923,0.00008370904,0.00017361941,0.00012391123,0.00024265511,0.00028384782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994408,0.000024262807,0.000090257265,0.00013401941,0.00007292871,0.00023771478],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031757148,0.00007421827,0.00008320222,0.00004065883,0.006558875,0.00007038388,0.0002458541,0.000073335825,0.0009191912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021282707,0.000064765045,0.00009567285,0.00015177928,0.00014858191,0.000269437,0.000019863883,0.00030877074,0.00033838954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004557602,0.00006625952,0.00004366647,6.592022e-7,0.00001137131,0.000005699898,0.0009362299,0.0000067700007,0.00003800419,0.9967393,0.0008563187,0.0012911299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009658309,0.00004272145,0.000663005,0.0000099871495,0.000012951825,0.00000896332,0.0012661815,9.1629914e-7,0.00050488056,0.016685018,0.98061657,0.000092245224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008245767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022862362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014047323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017655115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988408899","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-1130.2005.00030.x","title":"A Charge We Have to Keep. A Road Map to Personal and Economic Freedom for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities in the 21st Century","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual freedom; Hippocratic Oath; Citation; Library science; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.047716136038599456,"score_gpt":0.3604403713578335,"score_spread":0.31272423531923405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988408899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80324835,0.00097219204,0.00006284642,0.17948787,0.00008360093,0.00080626993,0.000099307435,0.000008432619,0.015231149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406767,0.0012250391,0.00070668553,0.0017721101,0.0012180454,0.00010362754,9.2831533e-7,0.000014482982,0.0008914326],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982344,0.00039869986,0.00046663944,0.0002349163,0.00025155916,0.00041378307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95786005,0.041583367,0.00013333434,0.00012821307,0.00009771285,0.00019734415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017963332,0.00017935062,0.00029220508,0.00020872992,0.00036580706,0.0003105736,0.00029437436,0.00008065797,0.00023552199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053959426,0.0001280076,0.000084315,0.00022021584,0.0006929171,0.0006998062,0.00006918338,0.00037511034,0.000021633396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075448456,0.00017641534,0.00023407009,0.000028245538,0.000026850797,4.400566e-7,0.94915825,0.000050685336,0.000010431018,0.039647955,0.0030237294,0.0068884306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024575656,0.00039008976,0.00005974432,0.000049797505,0.000016498705,0.00003766791,0.60209507,0.00009461287,0.000005782742,0.0006328195,0.39625922,0.00011294303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072511635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027421966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3932355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004444929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004770845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988471215","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v2n4p72","title":"Legal Regulation of Administrative Monopoly As Viewed from Chinese Antimonopoly Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Administrative law; Law; Harm; Agency (philosophy); Public law; Business; Economic Justice; Political science; Enforcement; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Market economy","score_opus":0.02609180754453805,"score_gpt":0.3559440998989172,"score_spread":0.32985229235437913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988471215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8205739,0.0002453818,0.000096069496,0.0060120765,0.00008096727,0.00007298947,0.00003064099,0.0000052236187,0.1728827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788094,0.00006865452,0.00064086413,0.00064004026,0.00038744113,3.0263422e-7,0.0000020628615,0.0000031534917,0.0003765341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992183,0.0000504832,0.0003177036,0.00006649903,0.00021771359,0.00012930558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992495,0.00007615439,0.00028277942,0.00007867478,0.00016507319,0.00014777898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020626461,0.00006528605,0.00017452241,0.000022900842,0.00023743062,0.00007457101,0.0001116771,0.000055411027,0.000044280616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004137641,0.000051933723,0.00006950088,0.00007576347,0.0002490108,0.00025663417,0.000009635067,0.00010353102,0.0000017899067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010248965,0.000058047815,0.00015620195,0.0000015621891,0.000012321936,0.0000021099909,0.0013663147,0.0000023227478,0.0015874059,0.9964904,0.00007650218,0.00023655217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063427724,0.00045512232,0.034556575,0.00005761096,0.00006848752,0.00001094708,0.0016167805,0.000078784535,0.0043935142,0.6782227,0.2797347,0.00017049337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010228875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011064265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3182677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002627719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014201648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988984160","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1123","title":"THE LAW AND POLITICS OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Commonwealth; Politics; Political science; Mainstream; Realism; Private law; Legal realism; Comparative law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01074838589350766,"score_gpt":0.2397695653175655,"score_spread":0.22902117942405784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988984160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06546656,0.00060762255,0.00015184846,0.0049047046,0.00006636643,0.00011100662,0.000005973728,0.000005751391,0.9286802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997069,0.00061271735,0.00037624393,0.00004913931,0.0000512584,3.1700715e-8,1.2188566e-7,9.690963e-7,0.0018404922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964964,0.00003727165,0.000059378064,0.000033358694,0.00012538483,0.00009493397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961966,0.00004959,0.000078926925,0.000057443587,0.00011167147,0.00008270463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001520799,0.000023921571,0.000047899593,0.000002358775,0.0013384151,0.000028548813,0.00016552587,0.000021399326,0.00030018762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005147279,0.000019491132,0.0000293357,0.000010182334,0.00045912992,0.00025744215,0.000039981023,0.00004355201,0.000002644481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012402372,0.00001302031,0.000107088774,0.000001228247,0.000009755493,2.2532147e-7,0.003342591,8.9486036e-7,0.000043945958,0.9952751,0.0006842748,0.0005206496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014083038,0.000024109722,0.0018595618,0.0000058740325,0.000014974173,0.0000011957097,0.030398088,0.000010302305,0.000024114872,0.008128422,0.95935905,0.00003350694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3656249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18603668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009056185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034376382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989241908","doi":"10.7202/1026983ar","title":"Reopening the Langelier—Mignault Debate on Unauthorized Transactions Involving a Minor's Property","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Section (typography); Authorization; Property (philosophy); Law; Major and minor; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer security; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.025716217945193597,"score_gpt":0.2685590023286666,"score_spread":0.24284278438347298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989241908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35221797,0.00013102674,0.019622792,0.044348102,0.00038076204,0.0014558248,0.000031541764,0.00045888126,0.58135307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784999,0.000077645374,0.0007413519,0.0005366096,0.00045383128,0.00013406057,0.0000046781893,0.000017564402,0.01953435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988878,0.00019368726,0.00016977238,0.00022711417,0.00018198963,0.00033964313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992286,0.00021607701,0.00007474801,0.00030379224,0.000054506818,0.00012225127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083648716,0.00007801197,0.00013086841,0.000034424836,0.0010532561,0.00015411476,0.00038125133,0.00008667262,0.000121523175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017894755,0.00006566151,0.00009551848,0.00027955562,0.00011418681,0.00013211166,0.000015533635,0.00027374533,0.00018703738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071063805,0.00028253536,0.0014801084,0.00011717741,0.000072382325,0.000013660567,0.055188533,0.0012458974,0.008527342,0.81549317,0.005264202,0.11224394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059243076,0.000090270936,0.0023467536,0.00018974395,0.00009346977,0.0000123689015,0.0036859638,0.0072038085,0.0009844339,0.037235856,0.9470961,0.00046878596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028895345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036025813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014842245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089345034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81009007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989959054","doi":"10.7202/1019050ar","title":"Les défis du droit suisse de l’insolvabilité face au trust : séparation des patrimoines, publicité et poursuite pour dettes","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.03280326000870325,"score_gpt":0.29971933485262314,"score_spread":0.2669160748439199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989959054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7185522,0.0015769992,0.0028021145,0.108344294,0.0006550547,0.00053499074,0.00013212465,0.00010030061,0.16730192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862162,0.0009501478,0.0032543272,0.000988474,0.0017027527,0.000052836218,0.000010250574,0.000042671152,0.006782372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967965,0.00068979984,0.0006489281,0.00035806297,0.00052271696,0.0009840159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975711,0.0004706588,0.00041948928,0.0002713613,0.0005858696,0.0006814917],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020577786,0.00030733927,0.00031589053,0.00008242802,0.007245992,0.00085643725,0.0006243398,0.00029095597,0.0018380327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004890216,0.0002941841,0.00028014235,0.0004925665,0.00067839713,0.001922571,0.000115388524,0.000688973,0.0005205148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009822783,0.00038487054,0.027856123,0.000030713778,0.000065964,0.000010600399,0.0028964488,0.00046208562,0.00059246685,0.9128734,0.0033272041,0.051490325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052512856,0.00009286563,0.04835617,0.00007926293,0.00008679345,0.00018025105,0.003423141,0.001198977,0.000573013,0.059843715,0.8852135,0.000427177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15271601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8818863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013627899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020880606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990585958","doi":"10.1108/eb025956","title":"A Bit of an Ending: The <i>Bre‐X</i> Litigation, Class Actions and the Liability of Professionals","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Context (archaeology); Class action; Law; Legislation; Law and economics; Business; Individualism; Political science; Economics; Finance; Corporate governance; History","score_opus":0.027606676943310145,"score_gpt":0.3459518799927251,"score_spread":0.31834520304941494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990585958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669536,0.00019170332,0.000038082693,0.012908778,0.00010101876,0.00022814835,0.000017043913,0.000003846741,0.01955781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985765,0.00008704289,0.00016015171,0.00021123809,0.0003144686,0.0000059146328,3.627693e-7,0.00000275837,0.0006415473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886435,0.0002648871,0.00040225076,0.000065671426,0.0003017387,0.0001011073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883896,0.00034524532,0.00033960084,0.00013957985,0.0002801458,0.00005645462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018890642,0.000048752685,0.00016205828,0.000024404997,0.00049369794,0.000023618808,0.00025554662,0.000053853437,0.00013647163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044400623,0.000026277283,0.00009668735,0.00023077925,0.0006623353,0.00022783686,0.00001796127,0.00019120962,0.0000012938127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002177285,0.00037393047,0.0011254429,0.000018765668,0.00001713438,5.916323e-7,0.022054767,0.00002310362,0.0013720068,0.9422022,0.0022937497,0.030300563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011775439,0.00020805551,0.15089336,0.00009816972,0.00010585015,0.000011661296,0.004587408,0.000054698172,0.0031505488,0.08994347,0.7496445,0.00012469657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005760613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020849974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85225874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023970284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044413636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37971753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990591862","doi":"10.7202/1027181ar","title":"La fiducie : outil efficace de protection contre les créanciers dans un contexte d’insolvabilité ?","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.015907792313176596,"score_gpt":0.25265346373665015,"score_spread":0.23674567142347355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990591862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8526078,0.0008398846,0.042185914,0.018492201,0.00037215854,0.0009864431,0.000069235844,0.00018471526,0.084261656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97462195,0.00024785165,0.0009460552,0.0002708636,0.00088191056,0.00018636673,0.000007795982,0.000037040343,0.022800153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997406,0.0007377222,0.0003759831,0.00050457765,0.00022240552,0.00075332605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998438,0.00041139638,0.00021848152,0.00046497688,0.000119903314,0.0003472304],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018092513,0.00019110672,0.00032947512,0.000038327194,0.0009080497,0.00014369798,0.00045775165,0.0004360143,0.00018340652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006703772,0.00027472805,0.0002507463,0.00044163605,0.00087833754,0.000178908,0.00006845409,0.000553319,0.00024660002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032814238,0.00038400004,0.0036918926,0.00027371926,0.00006769624,0.00001222905,0.025405012,0.00083323417,0.0030984126,0.61288327,0.0004840083,0.35283372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008135533,0.0001256393,0.015319601,0.00026658695,0.00014870061,0.000052465468,0.0050750356,0.0125840455,0.0009851059,0.056661095,0.9074483,0.00051988324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008361459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031273952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9069643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007735136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024587446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992484021","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2637","title":"The fault of trespass","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Duty; Tort; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Liability; Law; Contributory negligence; Normative; Possession (linguistics); Strict liability; Business; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009435617330577219,"score_gpt":0.24321257248906838,"score_spread":0.23377695515849117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992484021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025445813,0.00017264632,0.001617548,0.0034068886,0.000096548065,0.00004776549,0.0000036901024,0.0000070320743,0.96920204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967926,0.00028217654,0.00036382282,0.000014665629,0.00007657204,1.0905666e-8,1.07472125e-7,0.000001008113,0.0024690365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959856,0.00007820572,0.000057764275,0.00003239516,0.00015270968,0.00008034511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957794,0.000082762774,0.000107653046,0.00007307738,0.00010201685,0.0000565666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038971065,0.000021210904,0.00005092331,0.0000027943759,0.0011188997,0.000015196163,0.00029827605,0.000023049293,0.00024140778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023716626,0.000017183445,0.00005596339,0.000014620754,0.0002755607,0.00013893464,0.000026698795,0.000046590867,0.000002797987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010742971,0.000015948472,0.00016424473,8.9853546e-7,0.000011196366,2.5727292e-7,0.0036375334,0.000012447209,0.000080804755,0.9840508,0.0016181873,0.010396932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012545293,0.00001838067,0.0013750497,0.000004281937,0.000008747506,4.439677e-7,0.008405568,0.00003249227,0.00002708821,0.0014656623,0.9885147,0.000022102535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0971511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41099766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006810532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037519563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90886104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993245295","doi":"10.7202/042510ar","title":"Formality or Informality. A Case-Study of British National Insurance Local Tribunal Procedure and Practice","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Formality; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.02291046701174878,"score_gpt":0.31397405229976694,"score_spread":0.2910635852880182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993245295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97900915,0.0007364885,0.0022359283,0.0036832734,0.000058736267,0.000594254,0.00033542002,0.000030518113,0.013316237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98985,0.00025721264,0.0013217618,0.00092346384,0.00027737205,0.00006328891,0.0000070487044,0.000010049216,0.00728983],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819696,0.00019124775,0.00047209772,0.00024532602,0.0005218089,0.00037255095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853987,0.000495676,0.00028881434,0.000121729914,0.00035556057,0.00019833588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014951272,0.00012649903,0.00021958392,0.00003600105,0.0005845187,0.000103246784,0.00018582198,0.00027011355,0.00006280906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069455913,0.00015500342,0.000059082875,0.0005158253,0.001132666,0.0012299014,0.000057353216,0.00047159535,0.000008643409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005885384,0.004300674,0.012646858,0.0006412443,0.00035679323,0.0009870714,0.18504524,0.002089272,0.00001007917,0.32982644,0.0035945089,0.45991325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033767489,0.00061442424,0.040348195,0.00014416037,0.00023992681,0.0178142,0.2601988,0.005272867,0.000019541849,0.003953513,0.6673124,0.0007052197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029094983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06781303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66371787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069082715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053275115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9773704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993448166","doi":"10.1111/1467-9299.00256","title":"The Lost Legitimacy: Property, Business Power and the Constitution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian National University; Leverhulme Trust; Manchester Metropolitan University","keywords":"Legitimacy; Competition (biology); Constitution; Politics; Accountability; Quarter (Canadian coin); Power (physics); Democracy; Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Political economy; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03152106397148123,"score_gpt":0.3043101881480836,"score_spread":0.27278912417660234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993448166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015712854,0.00008404287,0.001950956,0.4089601,0.00014182528,0.00058944686,0.0000035559644,0.000045817807,0.57251143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99361813,0.0002536888,0.000027980997,0.00033806302,0.00017597819,0.0000684265,0.0000069071843,0.0000024908638,0.0055083614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993028,0.00009802552,0.00012748425,0.0001139045,0.0001971071,0.00016065226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994095,0.00013541523,0.00006697922,0.00014065795,0.00018885275,0.00005858498],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007617311,0.00005290377,0.000048677655,0.00001137796,0.0018549153,0.0007350812,0.00016351612,0.000038114813,0.000096856915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004075095,0.000024446372,0.000018906889,0.00027183953,0.0011908608,0.00036420868,0.00002760436,0.00007114788,0.00004264865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017495046,0.000018419403,0.00047306894,6.9543205e-7,0.000003585301,4.443424e-7,0.00039369205,2.4696166e-7,0.0000061467167,0.99270386,0.0010029231,0.0053794337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022392093,0.0000077036675,0.003106342,0.0000017841786,0.0000054203433,0.000008186841,0.0010448324,0.00007964811,0.00000437457,0.0046543437,0.9908147,0.00004877123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037581802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003244547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030245401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004819206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994381960","doi":"10.7202/042560ar","title":"La prise de possession par le fiduciaire en vertu d'un acte de fiducie","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deed; Possession (linguistics); Corporation; Law; Business; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.011437268889691122,"score_gpt":0.26904498816788,"score_spread":0.2576077192781889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994381960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94146544,0.0001377631,0.0053728633,0.006752326,0.000029932196,0.00015639844,0.000010307439,0.0001300457,0.045944955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98634005,0.00018841408,0.0054070936,0.0009182549,0.0003626163,0.00003731869,0.0000073321285,0.000017511888,0.006721428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988046,0.00020860175,0.00013780822,0.00021096726,0.00018357433,0.00045441894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926364,0.00020208955,0.00006249761,0.00021561733,0.00003005708,0.00022611476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081219623,0.000097851786,0.000109839886,0.000034867895,0.00084594724,0.00010397714,0.00037139657,0.00029750707,0.000097550335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023564907,0.00010478466,0.00008663951,0.00018563012,0.00028432457,0.00019078796,0.000041384967,0.00038175608,0.000062583276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031679763,0.00032405302,0.0073886244,0.000030677198,0.000047931964,0.000034496672,0.086762406,0.0002772923,0.011130669,0.50317734,0.0065156925,0.38427913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030354073,0.000014274728,0.033562988,0.000027143178,0.00002703944,0.000009539853,0.0032355445,0.00036522583,0.004821984,0.018022384,0.9393727,0.00023762461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021238187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010007303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93285704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008763571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004537669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6506428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995581034","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2001.tb00182.x","title":"Is breach of confidence a fiduciary wrong? Preserving the reach of judge-made law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Doctrine; Conflation; Hacker; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Computer security; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09780596430543234,"score_gpt":0.39822027612726757,"score_spread":0.3004143118218352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995581034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31920227,0.008518755,0.00014729437,0.047030706,0.00019298513,0.00062719686,0.000037745936,0.00006789197,0.62417513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99347264,0.0010240959,0.00008893783,0.0004084036,0.000142521,0.000032570555,6.0845827e-7,0.000005084362,0.0048251576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989708,0.000088257686,0.00024331594,0.00016058394,0.0003318916,0.00020514666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990476,0.00030308147,0.00014115918,0.0002774132,0.00019805247,0.000032723983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005417048,0.00007866502,0.00019473227,0.00001501824,0.00057193515,0.000026097598,0.00043709716,0.000040930925,0.000060738104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013343376,0.000054923592,0.00007675387,0.0002673701,0.00079151394,0.00017856617,0.00019797076,0.00011497829,0.000008533001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009095296,0.000059745133,0.0030203022,0.000029487039,0.00008780334,0.0000012244318,0.038607933,0.00000911161,0.0006365759,0.95021653,0.0066522243,0.0006699551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019591529,0.000047912148,0.011343959,0.00009627427,0.000072744864,0.000002223209,0.03632562,0.00003185981,0.003242858,0.021404285,0.92706096,0.00017538924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044147134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010117221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92881227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031483505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005863029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.962218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997650404","doi":"10.7202/042542ar","title":"La recevabilité de l'action d'intérêt public","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Public interest; Judicial review; Action (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.024763611205764677,"score_gpt":0.3053340460047174,"score_spread":0.2805704347989527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997650404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7837164,0.000055346754,0.0072995,0.012943217,0.000045727666,0.00013601406,0.000004534385,0.00016083065,0.19563846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860455,0.00011701955,0.0024627366,0.000602142,0.00040207818,0.000041881798,0.0000038626436,0.000009725228,0.010315046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912256,0.00013934751,0.00011009601,0.00015232756,0.00015629003,0.00031937644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999435,0.00015110479,0.00004397214,0.00015879667,0.00003929992,0.00017179597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008423915,0.00005929236,0.00006811249,0.0000403365,0.000501207,0.00012003225,0.00021081613,0.00021081364,0.00023211862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029590144,0.00006604231,0.000060797633,0.00022253196,0.00032662798,0.0002021022,0.0000151178965,0.000301509,0.00011421278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028990194,0.00004809328,0.002070711,0.0000044959806,0.000007613065,9.246255e-7,0.0070154187,0.000030354271,0.0003688552,0.8247123,0.0014014933,0.16433688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000836289,0.0000062747804,0.004155229,0.000003041531,0.0000071400605,0.0000030672422,0.002692696,0.00016433698,0.00020480412,0.026069073,0.96652025,0.00009048668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010883207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043091937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9651187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013079393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018790645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38549298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997740180","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0006","title":"Can the Law Do Without the Reasonable Person?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Honor; Causation; Jurisprudence; Philosophy of law; Common law; Positivism; Sociology; Comparative law; Adjudication; Criminal law; Reasonable person; Political science; Law and economics; Liability","score_opus":0.01632376486803916,"score_gpt":0.24679325122369217,"score_spread":0.230469486355653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997740180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015661031,0.00048602646,0.00006400158,0.05166796,0.000058734895,0.00010723951,0.000007935578,0.000013325944,0.93193376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99133795,0.00021519444,0.0003797368,0.00032158234,0.0003027213,7.4338324e-8,2.4784765e-7,0.0000024366657,0.0074400674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939716,0.000100932695,0.000050125047,0.00006392759,0.00023441986,0.00015344216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995625,0.000042318505,0.000088201756,0.00013152404,0.000090608024,0.000084863175],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045625368,0.000042476742,0.000060943497,0.0000024685846,0.003433843,0.0000772598,0.0005195484,0.00003165462,0.0011600823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007353608,0.000027882908,0.00007294192,0.000024444327,0.0004996521,0.0002883711,0.000037583373,0.00013245924,0.000011200223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007370361,0.000019083258,0.00020739473,4.877601e-7,0.000017813292,9.38358e-7,0.027775992,0.000025901652,0.000012337677,0.9661131,0.0042240885,0.0015955267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012950765,0.000009366764,0.0006301358,0.00000536954,0.000022640153,0.0000044825615,0.07027014,0.00002601074,0.0000057816383,0.0005234631,0.9283333,0.000039810202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41046366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8384929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9756769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026969847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089265355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997907591","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1846083","title":"The Underlying Value of MacCormick’s Post-Positivism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Positivism; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Epistemology; Statistics","score_opus":0.03441320699679666,"score_gpt":0.30636439767105866,"score_spread":0.271951190674262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997907591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79710525,0.002626252,0.009888014,0.008561143,0.0003280473,0.00035245926,0.000003966193,0.00005489332,0.18107998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958247,0.0020835106,0.00008245289,0.00006940909,0.00011108097,0.0000035860417,3.028595e-7,0.0000073164438,0.0018176496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983906,0.00010637201,0.00017354947,0.0000751863,0.00021503055,0.0010392743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994977,0.00007735943,0.00014230442,0.00011012589,0.00011593208,0.00005654998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018482939,0.00005538234,0.00006750629,0.000025628753,0.001152037,0.0000453548,0.00039263038,0.000039431317,0.000023551247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005796375,0.00003850395,0.00008119866,0.00013222644,0.0001602791,0.00014081465,0.000028005228,0.0006319637,0.000018904455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008397325,0.000019296713,0.0003651758,4.611296e-7,0.000029485078,2.4316975e-7,0.0025821985,0.0000010030966,0.0003036998,0.98162574,0.000011989416,0.015052323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018094831,0.00012892597,0.0054175165,0.000008995705,0.000030049534,0.000034334844,0.029040636,0.000019229135,0.00022741588,0.94841665,0.016388105,0.000107206884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035570096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008628996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19871946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030093122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020333894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8860653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998498338","doi":"10.1017/s0268416007006492","title":"Sir John Baker, <i>The Oxford history of the laws of England, Volume VI: 1483–1558</i> . (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.) Pages cl+964. £125.00. Sir JohnBaker, The Oxford history of the laws of England, Volume VI: 1483–1558. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.) Pages cl+964. £125.00.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Continuity and Change","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); History; Media studies; Theology; Philosophy; Sociology; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.028515974193738608,"score_gpt":0.22160788306594223,"score_spread":0.19309190887220362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998498338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68899614,0.033133905,0.0008530882,0.007513735,0.0062231165,0.010005374,0.004466791,0.00042489948,0.24838299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8434411,0.029597972,0.00015235771,0.0005371495,0.0008858471,0.000048004607,0.00008378861,0.000089798676,0.12516396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937925,0.0012490599,0.0012181646,0.0009944912,0.0014203875,0.001325397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99350184,0.00065234216,0.0021087024,0.001965892,0.0013742018,0.00039703216],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003252581,0.0007897355,0.0012798158,0.0001744596,0.0013924796,0.000065578075,0.0033520078,0.0007731218,0.00028235852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050209055,0.00056903576,0.0007175961,0.0012918611,0.0044615488,0.0008826178,0.0014060851,0.0012415601,0.0000018441247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003237503,0.0032997509,0.2858357,0.0020042304,0.0015112129,0.00006021794,0.13103615,0.00011073482,0.0017631783,0.10127487,0.4041369,0.06572955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00228094,0.00020923601,0.03728421,0.00017017755,0.0004720634,0.000006750262,0.007071976,0.0002281867,0.00034429558,0.00013100971,0.95117766,0.0006235155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008797132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039171886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54704076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011519252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010911897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998545607","doi":"10.1350/clwr.33.2.130.36494","title":"Re-Examining Public Policy—A Case for Conditional Fees in Singapore?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public policy; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Law; Public administration; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.14089845902713205,"score_gpt":0.4197903388280506,"score_spread":0.27889187980091856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998545607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008156287,0.06042062,0.00050422875,0.40098536,0.00017247765,0.0034061891,0.00016967305,0.00024391276,0.52594125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881231,0.003464058,0.0006829318,0.0065246243,0.0002520961,0.0002549974,0.00006253405,0.000010680877,0.0006249761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989912,0.00009656676,0.00030977215,0.00017873806,0.00014937278,0.00027435564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929965,0.0002011897,0.00010853485,0.0002054526,0.000063645275,0.000121542595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008288704,0.00008837481,0.00022518326,0.00006361727,0.0006282572,0.000097121934,0.00022470356,0.000032462343,0.00014768344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016146446,0.00008333075,0.00007639322,0.0006949823,0.00022321448,0.00022335515,0.00004894682,0.00012239968,0.000033618606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.925741e-7,0.000046396795,0.00019230561,0.00015081771,0.0000033659826,0.000015347414,0.00015667966,0.0000045772467,0.0000011318732,0.99362665,0.0016414821,0.004160769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018707677,0.000007950375,0.00015610737,0.0005224352,0.000010703027,0.000010097385,0.00011794605,0.0000020058521,0.0000044114627,0.050179403,0.94869375,0.00010808087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057100323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18579929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020433826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025345894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86318994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999169995","doi":"10.1163/15718158-14010298","title":"Native Title Litigation In Australia: Does The Judiciary Deliver On The Principal Objectives Defined By Mabo?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asia Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Law; High Court; Common law; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.028384733331232877,"score_gpt":0.30231283325095754,"score_spread":0.27392809991972467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999169995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46619305,0.000035256442,0.00000383969,0.01702319,0.00009150317,0.00030692862,0.0000054856246,0.000008272229,0.5163325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901857,0.00002135882,0.0000043206624,0.00019145456,0.00016475155,0.000019934667,9.528783e-7,0.0000031965415,0.009408358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993134,0.00021006516,0.00010928323,0.00007842753,0.00016926102,0.00011953843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954027,0.0002252357,0.00007239404,0.000091956674,0.00003749691,0.000032649532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044396482,0.00005950197,0.00006464582,0.000014226403,0.0014145734,0.00018025783,0.00015356699,0.000033635257,0.0006062118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000977365,0.000019956124,0.00003508122,0.0000610597,0.00047458409,0.00008571886,0.000012846824,0.0002647912,0.00014053457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038653607,0.000019968953,0.000017778155,2.4405304e-7,0.0000095923915,4.4323633e-7,0.0033963495,7.0164526e-7,0.000011290215,0.99264127,0.0038239004,0.00007461897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019690741,0.000022118458,0.0026670021,0.00001665885,0.000007158668,0.0000013571185,0.0019023927,0.0000086167975,0.0000794931,0.77792776,0.21711867,0.000051873994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003263347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001583066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52399266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000337823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010495335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001130030","doi":"10.1017/s0008197301680619","title":"<scp>HOW OLD DID YOU THINK SHE WAS?</scp>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Parliament; Law; Assertion; Element (criminal law); Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Archaeology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.027043065203731762,"score_gpt":0.2829666507860069,"score_spread":0.2559235855822751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001130030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39248332,0.0003409814,0.00029050236,0.046702653,0.00047933438,0.00020517778,0.000009554234,0.000088175526,0.5594003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95373803,0.0007535897,0.00008422421,0.0023541392,0.0025520332,0.000008524187,0.0000020342386,0.000017334292,0.040490113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983783,0.0002011329,0.00020561343,0.00016213169,0.0005410751,0.0005117638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989154,0.00021485088,0.00017060766,0.00031049232,0.00012510037,0.00026358408],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011532827,0.00012451441,0.00014416283,0.000025222304,0.003465582,0.0007007018,0.00082911627,0.00008763565,0.00005842307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013020085,0.000082847066,0.00013332168,0.00029512035,0.00031969737,0.00038946862,0.000091047645,0.0005952208,0.00018352906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003079672,0.00006718492,0.00048069144,0.0000018222645,0.00003073528,0.000028521386,0.005751044,0.000036333568,0.00017181099,0.8941462,0.09725918,0.0020233993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002261877,0.000023469154,0.0017203878,0.000011059903,0.000027084732,0.00011826142,0.0063734,0.000059351252,0.000067617584,0.002999312,0.9883182,0.000055655277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029534765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023786456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8911469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001109193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082881124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001489085","doi":"10.7202/1002367ar","title":"A Theory of Fiduciary Liability","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Law; Law and economics; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Economics; Business; Duty","score_opus":0.07976588171203447,"score_gpt":0.30689945305939625,"score_spread":0.22713357134736178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001489085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029603608,0.000030621104,0.000107894935,0.00030229724,0.000108278145,0.000061169274,0.000012888421,0.000014927708,0.96975833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855095,0.000027789494,0.00090838794,0.00009023168,0.000106621716,0.0000023616992,1.5955567e-7,0.0000034035393,0.00031012192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932337,0.00015687608,0.00016227829,0.00006692293,0.0001545657,0.00013598741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995462,0.00006010333,0.00009406731,0.000113486574,0.000088836045,0.00009732114],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012699108,0.000036893114,0.0000727408,0.000013165425,0.0016614953,0.0000105793215,0.00021148636,0.00003756847,0.001128948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007905786,0.000030073137,0.000071251045,0.00007998574,0.0002502253,0.00013497272,0.000028761417,0.00013194897,0.00002650246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072579114,0.000064058826,0.0003530978,0.0000015808806,0.0000066081047,0.0000010976088,0.0014622346,3.6621202e-7,0.00002779941,0.9942233,0.00004483194,0.0038077892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008520119,0.000022550832,0.004475283,0.000007590058,0.0000112269945,0.0000045735555,0.0014013952,0.0000011631035,0.0007483623,0.20787007,0.78531563,0.000056985096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027992295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051999236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003293369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016786857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002955568","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01147.x","title":"Married Women Bankrupts in the Age of Coverture","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Law; Family law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Economics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05823852396653272,"score_gpt":0.36629904452784495,"score_spread":0.3080605205613122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002955568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69091547,0.00005878443,0.000027660166,0.014104768,0.00013662784,0.0003104265,0.000011905478,0.000037818907,0.29439655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939502,0.000019885549,0.0000304711,0.0049237534,0.0005900101,0.000021253885,0.000005491059,0.0000032901862,0.00045562792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990893,0.00017673748,0.00014513437,0.00010492573,0.0002485156,0.00023535767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968505,0.00009231425,0.000055108594,0.00011164967,0.0000258951,0.000029964885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061781274,0.00005739858,0.00011665103,0.000008474392,0.00049237686,0.000045437315,0.00033318638,0.00009886501,0.000067101195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039705938,0.000045282068,0.000050795687,0.00029071487,0.00041958486,0.0000990342,0.000018272676,0.00016246719,0.000011451747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057401253,0.000057030855,0.00011052108,0.0000017852883,0.0000024753379,0.000002157509,0.16775931,8.5613914e-7,0.00022748088,0.8288042,0.0018094023,0.001219051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021989255,0.00002952747,0.03402784,0.000004873209,0.0000053494527,1.2893196e-7,0.033762604,0.0000011970728,0.000033731372,0.09884793,0.83295995,0.000106987376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013916001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002318624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83115053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007721318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006221909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37870142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003922734","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2008.00081.x","title":"Rights-based justifications for the tort of unlawful interference with economic relations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Plaintiff; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Strict liability; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.09846264614462974,"score_gpt":0.362582794066692,"score_spread":0.2641201479220623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003922734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35865065,0.004796237,0.13686061,0.2099449,0.0011578748,0.0056348173,0.0005397751,0.00045263665,0.2819625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518514,0.00008538375,0.0010209997,0.0000754639,0.000102223705,0.00024161121,0.0000028352115,0.0000038085889,0.003282516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995101,0.000019477106,0.00015095843,0.0001223158,0.00008178597,0.00011535685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912924,0.00044576044,0.00008662643,0.0001735754,0.00013959876,0.000025202538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014145965,0.000057407873,0.000099983255,0.000018364515,0.001666173,0.000015477735,0.00018996805,0.000021626107,0.000025275827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057619523,0.00003537722,0.0000463285,0.00010525585,0.0007227788,0.00009794289,0.000019278063,0.000052639203,0.000018424846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015767484,0.000042209867,0.002250527,0.0000062607824,0.000084711835,1.9013402e-7,0.005365643,0.0008848448,0.000015770838,0.98299706,0.00808911,0.00024790762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022443423,0.0000573338,0.009088185,0.000016351516,0.00007742734,5.0699373e-7,0.0026610198,0.00041626694,0.00018419488,0.0032069862,0.9839558,0.000111476045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027869095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015175259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007454017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019392709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003953273","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1714.2007.00048.x","title":"Remedies and Alternative Contracts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Business Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Damages; Normative; Law and economics; Common law; Breach of contract; Law; Process (computing); Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01943613472726323,"score_gpt":0.33084479609414263,"score_spread":0.3114086613668794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003953273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7227696,0.0003349285,0.010775747,0.018797351,0.00043679573,0.00016258734,0.0000047084427,0.00005694454,0.24666134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966116,0.0005433469,0.001073144,0.0007768182,0.0008304381,0.0000013530004,4.1495613e-7,0.000005811011,0.00015705444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925417,0.00003626577,0.00014577991,0.000089717854,0.00022906247,0.00024502206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991996,0.00013512169,0.00017567103,0.00005708354,0.00026489122,0.00016760078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006471545,0.000058732225,0.0001092791,0.00003272261,0.00097580545,0.00013355984,0.00012716641,0.000016877344,0.000031773037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001323842,0.000049402206,0.000020243297,0.00028301222,0.0010825924,0.00023949436,0.000024778816,0.0001388685,0.000008388734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031969186,0.00006104909,0.0056648105,0.0000022421173,0.000036655176,0.000053764896,0.005682931,0.000010779213,0.0006136899,0.85725963,0.00046252907,0.13011993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022741276,0.000020998743,0.11899747,0.000017148172,0.000014776417,0.00004731298,0.007934127,0.0000063598877,0.00009241791,0.0055127717,0.8669922,0.00013701445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021036252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018180477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86652964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047121935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060902465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004286390","doi":"","title":"That Can't Be Rights (Review of Robert Stevens's 'Torts and Rights')","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Liability; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024885780386617325,"score_gpt":0.2825179945316238,"score_spread":0.2576322141450065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004286390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4214989,0.21607387,0.0015851574,0.019335244,0.0006731056,0.001599023,0.00003464161,0.00013483806,0.33906522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93503326,0.061931573,0.00010111721,0.00020617683,0.00013764639,0.0000064374153,0.0000013004895,0.000006419256,0.0025760727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983293,0.000106841086,0.00021846172,0.00013506558,0.00028561454,0.00092475023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942404,0.00003056278,0.0001933351,0.00013375502,0.000089437184,0.00012885727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013093671,0.00009255293,0.00017958868,0.000037254686,0.00055100623,0.000018223333,0.00024830012,0.00005553633,0.00022687501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017585544,0.00006873316,0.00008320546,0.00013278732,0.00015308273,0.00015786734,0.00002884119,0.0005237873,0.0000054395236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038855883,0.000044792265,0.00058679754,0.000029767738,0.00004697621,0.0000015157367,0.0015245555,5.978723e-8,0.00001358797,0.9944931,0.0004059658,0.002848966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002469372,0.00010119656,0.0009612343,0.00031708626,0.000092325725,0.000077260964,0.00085207715,0.0000014304486,0.00024262047,0.5607904,0.43612072,0.00019672158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010473584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05486155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51353437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023984312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001010386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99611574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004954045","doi":"10.7202/1019051ar","title":"Justifying Fiduciary Duties","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Beneficiary; Corporation; Law; Law and economics; Business; Principal (computer security); Statute; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.040654380132251325,"score_gpt":0.3117595270626976,"score_spread":0.2711051469304463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004954045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011732243,0.00008406028,0.000060265924,0.009285775,0.00028613588,0.000104706145,0.000005205264,0.00004731862,0.97839427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964283,0.00009033878,0.00080404745,0.00051834085,0.00052880973,0.000010181882,4.8411636e-7,0.0000061164137,0.0016133888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926305,0.000058277405,0.00014264764,0.00007784651,0.00021688052,0.00024132125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995458,0.00004566357,0.00006491933,0.00008216524,0.00010461804,0.0001567915],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031916858,0.000051335654,0.00006634257,0.000019761805,0.006514066,0.00019363273,0.00020660683,0.00004359456,0.0021691285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040209743,0.000043418346,0.000055638044,0.00008876966,0.00012883457,0.0004182733,0.000035025227,0.00019911566,0.0005421481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.119379e-7,0.000016024887,0.0000968064,0.0000015818138,0.00000615255,0.0000019593401,0.00048150652,0.000009438272,0.000048714606,0.9875404,0.002733672,0.009063212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061028317,0.0000057221755,0.00059644575,0.000007818399,0.000005763854,0.0000095972655,0.0018446146,0.000015009555,0.000076664015,0.01433835,0.9829708,0.000068198635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009893162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074288417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98469603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006697773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012758924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005201898","doi":"10.1093/tandt/7.7.9","title":"Hong Kong's Private Unit Trust Structures","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Unit (ring theory); Library science; Queen (butterfly); The Internet; Management; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.04153485522455976,"score_gpt":0.33534441156528005,"score_spread":0.2938095563407203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005201898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77890366,0.00016788494,0.00015303121,0.0032751893,0.00024844985,0.00037133947,0.000015312784,0.0003102048,0.21655492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98246247,0.000279681,0.0007659996,0.00035918146,0.0007181103,0.00003418583,0.000012491557,0.000028047634,0.015339823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998168,0.000121447236,0.0002896288,0.00036079308,0.00046601906,0.0005941451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990082,0.00009947776,0.00012278349,0.00042647484,0.00008649555,0.00025659346],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003288839,0.00020029806,0.00022152708,0.00009625883,0.0010392442,0.00024289155,0.0006386573,0.00016345303,0.0025582644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011180351,0.00018255922,0.00011082552,0.00049687846,0.0003634547,0.00035151088,0.0000996992,0.00024552245,0.00030776154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026528278,0.000074106945,0.061908856,0.0000111386,0.000035794146,0.00001860316,0.00486866,0.00009544393,0.00024034675,0.9048504,0.0018138932,0.026056236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034839442,0.000021943071,0.10408693,0.000011368728,0.000029153696,0.00000565647,0.0021464906,0.00005947631,0.00021566165,0.0200027,0.8727801,0.00029215994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018760033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020053783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8848477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008311327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001372446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99835354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006134886","doi":"10.1002/iir.191","title":"Mortgagees and receivers exercising powers of sale – An English and Australian comparative analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Law; English law; Test (biology); Duty; Federal court; State (computer science); High Court; Political science; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer science; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.13581162522817558,"score_gpt":0.40354190336240753,"score_spread":0.26773027813423195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006134886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76418,0.014934417,0.00016954093,0.0013731159,0.00026422236,0.0006754151,0.000104412924,0.00006217773,0.21823668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710102,0.02745873,0.0010417504,0.00009532579,0.000034359386,0.000010585028,0.0000136003955,0.000002260964,0.00033317346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992918,0.00007033737,0.00021831624,0.00016233108,0.0001741885,0.00008306172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999446,0.00003631865,0.00013879359,0.00009918601,0.00019905623,0.000080658276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035640012,0.00006342509,0.00020206324,0.00006880189,0.00010634493,0.000026489311,0.00018180016,0.000024284647,0.00040799927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053288295,0.00005948814,0.000059416852,0.00026835804,0.00020680047,0.00032052794,0.000031394113,0.0000609497,0.0000026888345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041935786,0.0006263724,0.23691718,0.00054396805,0.0015501146,0.000008607783,0.19643003,0.000020159736,0.00022231854,0.52353317,0.0027783338,0.037327815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035643522,0.00011096189,0.2611677,0.0013657379,0.0011768438,0.000002020378,0.01533256,0.00015609118,0.00018363872,0.0032310653,0.7164033,0.0005136658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020176286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008161552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71362495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000215321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027404218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44673058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007696805","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2012.698885","title":"Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; English law; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Equity (law); Common law; House of Commons; Political science; Economic Justice; Unconscionability; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.043258160093453665,"score_gpt":0.35684425839838735,"score_spread":0.31358609830493367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007696805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620299,0.0078513315,0.00001071875,0.0055428105,0.0012587945,0.00030514266,0.000010109399,0.000011664301,0.32297948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778515,0.00013000511,0.000008326918,0.00035060145,0.0009355861,0.0000015537646,1.2300958e-7,0.000006431374,0.0007822113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984583,0.00046720967,0.00029977766,0.000043109016,0.00045356652,0.00027799036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985755,0.0003589114,0.0005270119,0.00026732456,0.00016304274,0.00010823051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035594443,0.000079404876,0.00016190665,0.000025110541,0.00033999307,0.000017421778,0.0009617469,0.00007339168,0.00013377951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003608942,0.000034212593,0.00022082076,0.00015476276,0.0006704423,0.00041821925,0.000091908514,0.0007261192,0.0000048270645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024656494,0.0007316203,0.008121475,0.000014546134,0.00015539497,0.000002897808,0.23899773,0.0003558439,0.006378372,0.6284802,0.11457256,0.0019427965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022450711,0.000034809043,0.074933834,0.00002731132,0.000048425016,0.000007483248,0.0013297189,0.0000044286744,0.00010731605,0.0007554386,0.9224615,0.00006521679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009549597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002368059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8078889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009487829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006446449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008661519","doi":"10.7202/1027132ar","title":"La législation belge sur le surendettement","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023827105726030025,"score_gpt":0.26214971137351906,"score_spread":0.23832260564748903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008661519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40952152,0.0010443286,0.008100485,0.054955278,0.0006017498,0.00041560875,0.000046247915,0.0001176304,0.52519715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95950234,0.0003316354,0.00074379134,0.0003101663,0.0011564033,0.00004156314,0.00002263913,0.000021095302,0.037870347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849695,0.000309751,0.0002743341,0.00028811404,0.00020581367,0.0004250416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909395,0.00021804948,0.00014651722,0.00030134458,0.00006811875,0.00017199677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010313342,0.00010211998,0.00018414606,0.000037505,0.00037346137,0.000103758546,0.00028124385,0.00021129374,0.00024773582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010304418,0.00016599128,0.00013055932,0.0003528881,0.00021854683,0.00025183937,0.00005816805,0.00023215877,0.00050993875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002122816,0.00014908359,0.0022437652,0.00006790999,0.00001762285,0.0000025596717,0.002446547,0.00025425866,0.0002984801,0.9394367,0.0031501052,0.05193089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002736123,0.00002630766,0.009505747,0.000079604026,0.00004034594,0.000006600202,0.00025368395,0.0032897876,0.00019335884,0.06583055,0.9202825,0.00021794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006176096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039102365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9171324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030807435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015004713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93364507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008978733","doi":"10.3366/shr.2010.0009","title":"<i>Civil Justice in Renaissance Scotland: The Origins of a Central Court.</i> By A. M. Godfrey. Pp. xiii, 486. ISBN: 9789004174665. Leiden: Brill, Medieval Law and its Practice Series, vol. 4, 2009. £152.00.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scottish historical review/˜The œScottish historical review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Brill; Law; The Renaissance; Economic Justice; History; Classics; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.019918845641916812,"score_gpt":0.2997408627463744,"score_spread":0.2798220171044576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008978733","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003340342,0.87286943,0.000090302885,0.098029226,0.0035287358,0.0029726615,0.0001232799,0.0001167374,0.022236206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051994324,0.9685903,0.00041320806,0.017605953,0.0015993547,0.0004869066,0.00003694473,0.000089738496,0.0059781577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99079,0.001720169,0.002406806,0.0013382272,0.0022856866,0.0014591091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925264,0.0021067043,0.0016597327,0.0015481638,0.001175404,0.0009835772],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064005596,0.00074731465,0.0020465956,0.00006207264,0.0015732746,0.00015669213,0.002282902,0.00042908292,0.0004566099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014432143,0.00054941984,0.00053495757,0.002444664,0.0010463452,0.001210888,0.00037927268,0.0024565638,0.00013959444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034225995,0.00033886344,0.00003795681,0.0031680404,0.000039936316,0.000025439616,0.00031102923,5.4176286e-7,0.00008401376,0.06450956,0.9221701,0.009280291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039030178,0.00012646297,0.000031691063,0.004341208,0.0008772224,0.00008766301,0.00004096969,0.000008619819,0.000006499404,0.00038937884,0.99305063,0.0006493698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028162349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019629776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09572086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050762775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009588259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009206298","doi":"10.3366/elr.2010.0304","title":"“A Strange Archaic Provision of Mercy”: The Procedural Rules for the <i>Duellum</i> under the Law of <i>Clann Duib</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Clan; Sociology; Criticism; History; Classics; Political science","score_opus":0.035471030898331035,"score_gpt":0.3424471035868621,"score_spread":0.30697607268853105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009206298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020163476,0.16724235,0.0009135558,0.5929199,0.0019031992,0.01996686,0.00032016655,0.0001620064,0.19640853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718419,0.020344285,0.0001869303,0.005468322,0.000716603,0.00056287576,0.0000069282787,0.000016167844,0.000855989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987031,0.000087963715,0.00038578012,0.00016855492,0.00039956713,0.00025499397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981813,0.0007967086,0.0002684568,0.0004981476,0.00020215084,0.000053256514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023134272,0.00011504623,0.00024554774,0.000005557244,0.0008415146,0.000040931904,0.0008935759,0.00005914765,0.00015583904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013328434,0.00004835301,0.0002257497,0.00021789187,0.001272716,0.00010880139,0.00007996553,0.0002579725,0.0000041234516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034810612,0.00003707082,0.00000813506,0.00023730515,0.000017390332,3.2140804e-8,0.0007564743,0.0000014309384,0.0005530901,0.984813,0.009312802,0.004259826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008254528,0.000020430263,0.000041564654,0.00027353552,0.00011225674,8.507821e-7,0.00048481606,0.000011283116,0.00029399837,0.016632104,0.9819753,0.00007128612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030871097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006420468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000108312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014450491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6472335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011161635","doi":"10.1353/ecf.0.0141","title":"Reforming Character: William Law and the English Theophrastan Tradition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Character (mathematics); The Renaissance; Slavic languages; Politics; Classics; Sociology; Media studies; History; Art history; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.00844928432593043,"score_gpt":0.24330217408111904,"score_spread":0.23485288975518862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011161635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6047502,0.0003557398,0.00009913777,0.0030964362,0.0025359574,0.0007156534,0.000035106168,0.00023242112,0.3881793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956824,0.0019857273,0.00006253515,0.00031563634,0.0017025081,0.00005834817,0.000030017287,0.000009578272,0.00015321335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912405,0.000090710746,0.00016841729,0.00019180642,0.00023013024,0.00019488046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945015,0.000094131654,0.000100957666,0.00019398813,0.000073985946,0.00008681905],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006185699,0.000090323265,0.00009299479,0.000025022542,0.001397594,0.00016678039,0.00015084648,0.0000987816,0.00011218651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051234412,0.000062056235,0.000058982874,0.00013724423,0.00044270125,0.00047766286,0.000025333726,0.00030528344,0.000017221764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002119593,0.000037727958,0.000082718296,0.0000027156477,0.0000068929508,2.0288121e-7,0.007718771,1.9133563e-7,0.0006630791,0.98767203,0.00047530865,0.003319136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045819956,0.000010538178,0.0019886172,0.000007056767,0.000020137792,0.0000013440863,0.0021995935,0.000044296037,0.00023653767,0.0021835635,0.99275154,0.00009859413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006669626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007519644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044091776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028485949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012531672","doi":"10.1037/1053-0479.15.1.89","title":"Restitution, Myth, and Reality.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychotherapy Integration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Psychology; Psychotherapist; Mythology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Theology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0375343406566268,"score_gpt":0.3871348398684812,"score_spread":0.3496004992118544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012531672","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2712474,0.0019173847,0.24493477,0.37620655,0.00077963446,0.00041127927,0.0000073238803,0.000057608446,0.10443807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98637193,0.004091656,0.0059235306,0.0010947139,0.0013094377,0.0000026671032,6.931543e-7,0.000004478778,0.0012008795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941236,0.00006504205,0.00022025462,0.000053442094,0.00017995559,0.00006894622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994927,0.000030163463,0.00017477051,0.00006089627,0.00017886785,0.00006261877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006432188,0.000039443297,0.000065903114,0.000053796917,0.0001957876,0.00006764615,0.00008406574,0.000043798005,0.000094082214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000298815,0.000030435223,0.000036352903,0.000111198846,0.00008716286,0.00032661992,8.796661e-7,0.00010963882,0.0000065498493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004593164,0.00007730129,0.00022850884,0.000001120392,0.000014540397,3.929561e-7,0.010865415,0.000026531021,0.0040838723,0.787741,0.01994062,0.17697473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022498403,0.00004599131,0.0013298875,0.000017684046,0.0000053422136,0.000006577862,0.00074100995,0.000051113268,0.00029186928,0.024131361,0.9731117,0.000042484702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001667778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014736243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049374605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15058596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012710559","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2775","title":"The mystery of privity: <i>Grand Trunk Railway Company of Canada v Robinson</i> (1915)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.017733287137583733,"score_gpt":0.2270689261279302,"score_spread":0.20933563899034646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012710559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3896528,0.0013648053,0.00055130525,0.004624361,0.0004591501,0.00025723843,0.000069173366,0.000010950589,0.60301024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998166,0.00014622186,0.0002091743,0.000019728224,0.00004869662,2.9107676e-8,4.7018526e-7,0.0000019792087,0.0014076792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919397,0.00011138127,0.00013726787,0.00005446292,0.0003629436,0.00013996732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991059,0.000086414526,0.00026544748,0.00011651189,0.0002675759,0.00015818619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005822002,0.000043878335,0.00014122356,0.00000538493,0.000685024,0.000014637311,0.0004000588,0.000031073872,0.000076662676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026278389,0.00003734248,0.00006382494,0.000033763856,0.00036061782,0.00020646666,0.00005198946,0.00007439872,3.561355e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004033572,0.000310039,0.0068263817,0.000043601347,0.0003068171,0.000019308169,0.06041945,0.00045040372,0.0009594642,0.81221616,0.11058275,0.007462279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005054373,0.000034912606,0.0019278151,0.00002005725,0.00002511892,0.0000023165885,0.021728216,0.00002202538,0.00010495197,0.00039705547,0.97517836,0.000053712873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93624866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86459565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032381975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085361185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.526872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013364851","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei132","title":"Homing Devices in Choice of Tort Law: Australian, British, and Canadian Approaches","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Choice of law; Tort; Law; Damages; Political science; Common law; Kingdom; Conflict of laws; Liability; Biology","score_opus":0.09087728675211142,"score_gpt":0.3248591918843926,"score_spread":0.23398190513228118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013364851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8163194,0.00008449164,0.000010443459,0.0016545302,0.000037499412,0.00009511117,0.000034857978,0.000005990044,0.18175767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998453,0.0000025006661,0.0001266668,0.000084953965,0.00010988375,0.000016071735,0.000011736172,0.0000016282582,0.001193555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948037,0.000028547953,0.00014285339,0.00012689455,0.00010914796,0.00011220976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997695,0.000049016373,0.00004540201,0.000032309665,0.00004418181,0.00005960851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008752368,0.000049404698,0.000092599636,0.000026278683,0.00015337103,0.00012918463,0.00010251113,0.000030649484,0.000027264694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000011282634,0.000055232806,0.00001460372,0.000053662017,0.0002457024,0.00022242365,0.0000064922383,0.000051722975,0.000002232098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017907286,0.000024749497,0.019235142,0.000002758102,0.0000072462244,0.0000012972549,0.0025450175,0.0000054369434,0.000024422294,0.97727877,0.000103912076,0.0007694629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039487015,0.000052453423,0.5003105,0.000053529293,0.000007689985,0.000004031757,0.007803494,0.00033075787,0.00007276901,0.030549023,0.4602219,0.00019900259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.904851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037912592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003480298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22523285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013425083","doi":"10.1093/ehr/ceq207","title":"The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians, and Courts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The English Historical Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Legal profession; Period (music); Middle Ages; Canon law; History; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Ancient history; Archaeology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.015706610135461808,"score_gpt":0.3057471770915269,"score_spread":0.29004056695606506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013425083","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020514665,0.31252372,0.000025745694,0.3957249,0.013172367,0.0037358387,0.000029225328,0.00015927719,0.2541143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8781916,0.100531965,0.00005117705,0.0013437812,0.0020831283,0.00016081895,0.000001139963,0.000016839065,0.01761955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987344,0.00026840987,0.00024414615,0.00013304634,0.00042705308,0.00019295905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986736,0.00043763075,0.00015596142,0.0004688152,0.00016978869,0.00009421483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017841731,0.0000803139,0.0001673307,0.00000441457,0.0015167659,0.00003507749,0.00070835487,0.000055194778,0.000056201978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017889015,0.000033222103,0.000089567366,0.00022930722,0.0005204869,0.00006182048,0.00011224624,0.0004586077,0.0000058922724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002059418,0.000024894585,0.00010207915,0.000086295404,0.000006043784,2.515043e-7,0.0019994073,3.8206597e-8,0.00002846691,0.90038997,0.08446354,0.012896941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037022663,0.0000053155586,0.00021843323,0.00012416416,0.00003785077,6.3282675e-7,0.00014854647,0.000001140757,0.000006184865,0.0007699081,0.99860054,0.00005028138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025934617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005513954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.914137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027107357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003874217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014376924","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0023","title":"The Association of State and Indigenous Law: A Case Study in 'Legal Association'","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; State (computer science); Normative; Legal research; Political science; Association (psychology); Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Legal opinion; Associative property; Legal profession; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008501322687538827,"score_gpt":0.25486889242610916,"score_spread":0.24636756973857032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014376924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560589,0.000106291736,0.0000130489325,0.0009340792,0.000033047952,0.00015652228,0.0000065871227,0.0000036944461,0.042687807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819124,0.00021233418,0.000057480538,0.000021712925,0.000025082954,4.9473993e-8,1.5003813e-7,0.0000010548953,0.0014909072],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923134,0.00018506047,0.00012302319,0.000055075103,0.00026913796,0.00013639258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992938,0.00013062982,0.00030978807,0.00005054305,0.00016271161,0.000052525982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012099884,0.00003468369,0.00009125623,0.000008882791,0.0012408046,0.000052800526,0.00012897034,0.000038405473,0.00002348237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032791537,0.00003283651,0.000031099633,0.000038723498,0.000048275466,0.00034200156,0.000019955136,0.00010790028,6.111722e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010133777,0.0009891988,0.17589322,0.000004391897,0.00021156578,0.00037804578,0.5308862,0.00009182955,0.00008545262,0.27852523,0.00053022883,0.012303307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032288805,0.0005918025,0.22953965,0.000023289354,0.00014332224,0.000050975646,0.5042396,0.000044986373,0.00002034536,0.0045285537,0.25732842,0.00026019086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46085808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9238759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46301788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093045586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009069043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9543391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014939371","doi":"10.7202/1013386ar","title":"Mental Capacity in the (Civil) Law: Capacity, Autonomy, and Vulnerability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Autonomy; Construct (python library); Framing (construction); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Psychological intervention; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer security; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.07018616730346944,"score_gpt":0.2966239825638687,"score_spread":0.22643781526039924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014939371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.506793,0.000019100664,0.000012338665,0.012272235,0.00010451567,0.00029229018,0.000023261802,0.000018631874,0.48046458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986287,0.00001976935,0.00025735574,0.0008475314,0.00015760271,0.000026914533,6.1593363e-7,0.0000042137726,0.000057312758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988113,0.00031227246,0.00020783771,0.00013488115,0.000264206,0.0002694829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994876,0.00011057119,0.00007342586,0.0001357159,0.000056644792,0.0001360901],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013276244,0.00007941688,0.00010313928,0.000015054317,0.004636169,0.00025586193,0.00028806803,0.000057620848,0.00026504148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035278987,0.000054410437,0.000049921033,0.00009969963,0.0005600319,0.00046058037,0.000051805,0.0004097994,0.000039318176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4862634e-7,0.000066549255,0.001381708,0.0000019872539,0.000004676191,7.373088e-7,0.0036818294,0.0000025501438,0.00007960968,0.99378467,0.00026050338,0.0007342407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021169288,0.00002015692,0.011277344,0.000007491844,0.000005838488,0.000028303555,0.0020469674,0.000057230034,0.00009468914,0.051728193,0.9344118,0.00011024265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10689558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32028237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018813577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015165328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99665964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015146938","doi":"10.7202/043814ar","title":"L’immixtion de tiers amicaux dans le mécanisme juridictionnel","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008774444267804228,"score_gpt":0.24342862223966316,"score_spread":0.23465417797185895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015146938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.699284,0.0009860863,0.13579041,0.05136796,0.00048324253,0.0003100742,0.000061774954,0.0002758646,0.11144058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9102753,0.00077836524,0.004813971,0.0013213651,0.0012892139,0.000048103513,0.000012735738,0.000040647,0.081420325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982774,0.00017158306,0.00027392665,0.00033284124,0.00026133613,0.0006828898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991354,0.00008343555,0.00012791225,0.00026427172,0.0000523477,0.000336663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059415953,0.00017281009,0.00016959147,0.00006089122,0.0013930699,0.000117053605,0.00037026955,0.0004607946,0.00021563788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057745827,0.00022322715,0.0001772613,0.00045009967,0.0012517562,0.00035185082,0.000031840857,0.00055405445,0.00046360467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006351591,0.00014042872,0.00042299286,0.0000149385405,0.00003701159,0.000004466452,0.020076819,0.0012624674,0.001888638,0.93311906,0.003840741,0.039186083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039411968,0.000038840677,0.0049319114,0.000030825086,0.00010127709,0.00002473034,0.012610927,0.0071259374,0.001549525,0.07324099,0.89957845,0.00037249285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008042458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038746812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035275817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049310783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015464647","doi":"10.7202/043970ar","title":"La lésion qualifiée : est-il possible de nuire impunément à autrui en droit québécois ?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007937926466275277,"score_gpt":0.2772049588996188,"score_spread":0.26926703243334354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015464647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91200185,0.0005681172,0.0033144923,0.01587277,0.00067105173,0.0004042411,0.00012124511,0.00016685072,0.06687936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227621,0.00063794915,0.0036937704,0.0009010067,0.00094062445,0.000095160365,0.00002496071,0.000052085164,0.07089237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720836,0.00035987436,0.0004201389,0.00052450324,0.0004684258,0.0010186973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980136,0.00051695836,0.00021415202,0.00053122017,0.00007781932,0.00064624613],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017089708,0.00029315718,0.0003108928,0.000087809676,0.0010464514,0.00026252598,0.0007869982,0.0010454161,0.0006691008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023949788,0.0003338987,0.00026866884,0.00053966563,0.0013595609,0.00030170684,0.00011725098,0.0015503,0.00040266736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011730505,0.00020725002,0.0013097464,0.00005257154,0.000042865577,0.000028461596,0.05332093,0.00004375133,0.0034235239,0.8589749,0.0013189247,0.081265375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039940714,0.000071778246,0.0067427484,0.000072266834,0.00011615894,0.000048080612,0.013855348,0.0011312568,0.0010642034,0.13169211,0.8442901,0.0005165533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09519926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07532206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84297115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018037306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010843338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20162444","doi":"","title":"Unjust Enrichment and the Role of Legal History in England and Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; High Court; Doctrine; Commonwealth; Political science; Appeal; Hindsight bias; State (computer science); Common law; History; Restitution","score_opus":0.010804597232660964,"score_gpt":0.2586162968211432,"score_spread":0.2478116995884822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20162444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848513,0.006558427,0.000030462175,0.0027463376,0.000031399904,0.00016111329,3.7073792e-7,0.0000034517197,0.0056171343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944604,0.002912215,0.000013861759,0.00003348796,0.00009455198,0.000009480146,1.5052991e-7,0.0000024096398,0.0024734426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990676,0.000089462206,0.00012563993,0.00006623749,0.00011671816,0.0005343084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976325,0.000048229947,0.00006824022,0.000048177964,0.000027799499,0.00004432127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012442196,0.00004270856,0.000077669385,0.000027405906,0.00015236124,0.00003085458,0.0001031487,0.000028798431,0.000050933795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024882045,0.000028841057,0.00001924007,0.000050149745,0.00023336249,0.00016169465,0.000021310561,0.00044202732,0.0000033603935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008320504,0.0000147302035,0.006108851,9.2209746e-7,0.000010193942,9.499638e-8,0.004003448,0.0000011734497,0.00014662652,0.9833797,0.00004026997,0.006285653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001414681,0.000062430394,0.016847078,0.000007173976,0.000019732382,0.000022765471,0.011716398,0.000048777452,0.000017831513,0.4174379,0.5523084,0.00009681276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021240423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02371175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5659418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003750941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048226112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99410295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016341494","doi":"10.7202/1027045ar","title":"Beneficiary-Initiated Modification of Trusts: A Comparative Examination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Law; Settlor; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Business","score_opus":0.06645468585408207,"score_gpt":0.32578849538259286,"score_spread":0.2593338095285108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016341494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84519106,0.0000209273,0.0055048945,0.00051655335,0.000030438505,0.0002328993,0.0000149532725,0.000053874275,0.14843439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986107,0.000038430535,0.00062715437,0.000032174026,0.00014577637,0.00004195484,0.00003532018,0.000005821929,0.00046268955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922365,0.00014655077,0.00019595883,0.0001429782,0.00013532235,0.00015556738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934775,0.0001330303,0.00015112855,0.00017094646,0.00013409396,0.00006304684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005821647,0.000045617617,0.00013291606,0.000052762047,0.00015451481,0.00002556753,0.00017682616,0.00007107943,0.000052563617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010809021,0.000067405635,0.000044623546,0.00028198032,0.00009305947,0.00012799783,0.000014093203,0.00007147893,0.000046939356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042724323,0.000086627304,0.00082154,0.000018968638,0.000007338991,1.753688e-7,0.013858534,0.0003674558,0.0018762654,0.97443974,0.00005974989,0.008459354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015705308,0.00026424922,0.45687008,0.00033537994,0.00017293781,0.0000060727803,0.018068997,0.124399945,0.013968205,0.31506014,0.06826097,0.0010224773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005785971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047788446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6593796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011589902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034767236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27487218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016647311","doi":"10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00038-6","title":"Resource allocation decisions in Canada's health care system: can these decisions be challenged in a court of law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Medical Association; Canadian Nurses Association","funders":"Canadian Medical Association","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Harm; Context (archaeology); Health care; Resource allocation; Law; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Business; Liability","score_opus":0.1024100849956399,"score_gpt":0.39642299333679504,"score_spread":0.2940129083411551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016647311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097520605,0.0034449657,0.000045969573,0.8311847,0.0000999387,0.0020678716,0.00038927596,0.00006600281,0.06518068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916691,0.0015465824,0.00016247881,0.006286433,0.000120506,0.00009035172,0.000014403581,0.000013457125,0.00009669428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744445,0.00049834576,0.0006805208,0.0002557089,0.00050654204,0.00061445124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983358,0.0004981147,0.00025091032,0.00039041572,0.00009042418,0.00043433215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008733971,0.00010714962,0.0003210521,0.00020949637,0.0005019078,0.000016765971,0.00033651324,0.00006979523,0.0000141990195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037555318,0.000107571286,0.000035765817,0.0008647632,0.00009212159,0.00005056642,0.000050504605,0.0002225699,0.0000049887976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060166362,0.00009388031,0.0005720503,0.00007093194,0.0000031787658,0.0000023257815,0.15406822,0.00031174876,9.892824e-7,0.8195939,0.0044663143,0.020810466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054302224,0.00005532808,0.012140706,0.00044667893,0.0000019688541,0.000001578607,0.08271241,0.00045283107,0.000001724892,0.00033755146,0.9031476,0.00015864451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8986812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052230367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008121042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017701405","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1128","title":"JUSTIFYING FIDUCIARY REMEDIES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Economics; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.019099113735496668,"score_gpt":0.25268118527066724,"score_spread":0.23358207153517058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017701405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044991113,0.00043079854,0.0005422923,0.004560284,0.00017185554,0.00009977032,0.0000027020606,0.000025004896,0.9491762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296,0.00055218564,0.0023115233,0.00005879999,0.00018529235,5.084409e-8,3.9436114e-7,0.0000019692627,0.0039298367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995592,0.000042157513,0.000060812756,0.000053761018,0.00016015205,0.00012388466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958813,0.000029294624,0.000075955315,0.000063287414,0.00013579152,0.00010751309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017971853,0.000031803083,0.00006248747,0.00000627349,0.0012165856,0.00003438158,0.00022906734,0.000034935365,0.004066966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016042717,0.000033913082,0.000052566535,0.00001748683,0.00019983127,0.0006221769,0.000040787232,0.000074865966,0.000041515967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010106166,0.000079148835,0.0013090245,0.000010513171,0.00005400755,0.000009142804,0.039547708,0.000018331042,0.00077082176,0.8957568,0.03944364,0.022990765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014670199,0.000013187965,0.004550017,0.000016071757,0.000017083872,0.0000022843021,0.04741327,0.000019833213,0.000020543697,0.0021178161,0.9456173,0.000065851375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32073396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2330182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94796884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001608049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054125903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99684346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018345762","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.322","title":"Litigation Privilege: Transient or Timeless? <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Adversarial system; Governor; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0981673817290953,"score_gpt":0.3851083503480055,"score_spread":0.2869409686189102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018345762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74507064,0.0014458214,0.026348023,0.1921844,0.0036225943,0.0010043008,0.00005268447,0.000025476085,0.030246027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630463,0.00018005568,0.0004598742,0.0012112067,0.0007723358,0.0000030052502,8.3910663e-7,0.000005669911,0.0010623735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977721,0.00007376545,0.00059339567,0.0000893366,0.0013044807,0.00016691402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749064,0.0007900377,0.0005808102,0.00012394846,0.0009205377,0.00009401897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022660142,0.00007437906,0.00013221953,0.00004936357,0.0001551637,0.000062281906,0.0009763879,0.000037490285,0.00017217115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059176004,0.000042912136,0.00008200528,0.00017495755,0.00018496363,0.0003837623,0.000042820804,0.00018712586,0.0000033791773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055334345,0.0017051375,0.012198602,0.00040846545,0.0012313301,0.00053972244,0.078605175,0.0028683622,0.06626744,0.42045888,0.15837152,0.25181192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006528276,0.00024238012,0.007214715,0.0010903268,0.00022212064,0.00010092958,0.0070158783,0.00010420473,0.040097144,0.003092636,0.9399147,0.00025212526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012920129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1300231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7815432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021413332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014278363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99365294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018708350","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2007.00078.x","title":"The basis of the remoteness rule in contract","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Identification (biology); Action (physics); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05856460324819201,"score_gpt":0.342642214587948,"score_spread":0.284077611339756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018708350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167692,0.0019502045,0.0000036412926,0.02911362,0.0001625149,0.00018670523,0.000003356722,0.000013106848,0.05179765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957061,0.001455929,0.0000184649,0.00013193069,0.00007332153,0.000014746304,5.7730666e-8,0.0000021296091,0.0025973401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994282,0.00007472584,0.00012182695,0.000069452326,0.0001713428,0.00013443534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948674,0.00025336535,0.000053503216,0.00012716153,0.000065740394,0.000013478907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030660682,0.000038634746,0.00008658618,0.000006332392,0.0011920326,0.000012861036,0.0002324122,0.000019518939,0.0000039658303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002853446,0.000019547431,0.000046145924,0.00021068045,0.00058555836,0.000056155124,0.00006987605,0.00007532896,0.0000052761643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023505005,0.00013407861,0.16018389,0.0000132293735,0.00010818264,0.0000058673822,0.052400142,0.00008260396,0.0002929035,0.7639178,0.0050154366,0.01782236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001396512,0.000005117595,0.43299338,0.00001458013,0.0000073205283,6.962063e-7,0.0070386943,0.000009274996,0.0005195553,0.0033833832,0.5558268,0.00006153557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009875759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017687012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7605344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004068052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006501712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019028309","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.250712","title":"THE OFFICE OF OWNERSHIP","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Business; Property rights; Subject (documents); Law; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Common ownership; Property (philosophy); Right to property; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01649052370239258,"score_gpt":0.23994697288744257,"score_spread":0.22345644918504998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019028309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061773032,0.00032385977,0.00023936348,0.00447605,0.00008687123,0.00009860558,0.0000028080851,0.000007998676,0.9329914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954119,0.00029966084,0.00036703795,0.00001734084,0.00005451032,2.7106276e-8,1.2436428e-7,0.0000010622217,0.0038483888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996067,0.00005731565,0.000060885635,0.00003246359,0.0001507001,0.00009192655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951506,0.00007513582,0.0001123611,0.000071451366,0.00015894836,0.000067017165],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002530104,0.000022320255,0.00004684387,0.0000028245815,0.0010272317,0.000023506385,0.00031680948,0.000024307146,0.0011227502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017134382,0.000017052385,0.000053100433,0.000017820033,0.00031133706,0.00027134694,0.000028078868,0.00005445214,0.000014793048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010242701,0.000028848954,0.00032445023,0.0000017917187,0.000020986841,4.7792776e-7,0.006458886,0.0000061614433,0.00019703251,0.98159695,0.00538816,0.0059660203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011670776,0.00001640121,0.005251521,0.000005847979,0.000010025003,6.9985623e-7,0.031004181,0.000009599151,0.000027053215,0.0013760226,0.9621506,0.000031396274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2873564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2686457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008332408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057181845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202003056","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Nature of State Legal Authority","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Legislation; Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.010366447155192705,"score_gpt":0.29477738519120567,"score_spread":0.284410938036013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202003056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91915816,0.0071733077,0.0015313323,0.019161347,0.00042980653,0.0002312317,0.000008319077,0.00004502672,0.05226146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97797006,0.0112684965,0.000030855466,0.00005113266,0.00034022777,0.000002534286,5.0031673e-7,0.000005409196,0.010330791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820834,0.00012434305,0.0001746138,0.00008581058,0.00033213335,0.0010747391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947864,0.00008809633,0.00013031482,0.000120927885,0.000116504925,0.00006549211],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020111443,0.00005708261,0.00007852107,0.00002074459,0.0020166542,0.000039575803,0.00039935985,0.00007043675,0.000014952267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011517296,0.00003916736,0.00008671145,0.00019681243,0.00025033936,0.00015781444,0.000027072809,0.0019362798,0.000010415597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009866896,0.000023316952,0.00070964074,4.902149e-7,0.00002581308,0.0000012072716,0.0009230878,0.000004007112,0.000036232992,0.99039894,0.00078352814,0.0070838425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014588535,0.00004651837,0.0028933573,0.0000033700182,0.00000895359,0.00006872403,0.0030284517,0.000016080812,0.00009550157,0.412958,0.5806526,0.00008259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011806771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011237588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57986903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025357754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039401734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020259455","doi":"10.1177/03058298000290010439","title":"Book Review: Catherine Redgwell, Intergenerational Trusts and Environmental Protection (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999, 240 pp., £45.00 hbk.)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Millennium Journal of International Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.02059144545585317,"score_gpt":0.26859746124701306,"score_spread":0.24800601579115988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020259455","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032168407,0.93808126,0.00016584195,0.021235177,0.0004739721,0.0004547617,0.00005771756,0.000022534747,0.0073403316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042574488,0.9437612,0.00014664438,0.0011044991,0.00063697546,0.000009250953,0.0000069679286,0.000008365954,0.011751573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988373,0.0001162579,0.00034522612,0.00016854405,0.00039409084,0.00013859106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994369,0.000044213197,0.0002425566,0.00008106874,0.00011015344,0.000085109416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038829187,0.0001228725,0.00019678251,0.00003991145,0.00036712145,0.000036915884,0.00024419575,0.000049084636,0.00090525084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003567781,0.0001085258,0.00010428979,0.00005357966,0.00024424552,0.00039662194,0.00007782582,0.00018068025,0.00001411435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020593243,0.0002479928,0.00047551485,0.00009419128,0.00041863514,0.000023519726,0.003868276,0.000107665604,0.00043599526,0.00088991894,0.9746971,0.018535241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032029918,0.00007135442,0.0007563387,0.00018888907,0.00003893055,0.00002890202,0.0008561748,0.000037552818,0.00014435807,0.000010159305,0.9974402,0.00010679425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110339424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003640767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02274313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031858482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036889145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99118614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021737991","doi":"10.7202/1028058ar","title":"L’expérience de la pratique privée au Canada","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016194296803047115,"score_gpt":0.27366460903609136,"score_spread":0.25747031223304423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021737991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60352665,0.0006208928,0.0011772063,0.022991586,0.00048065584,0.000284986,0.00005385438,0.000044943845,0.37081924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96974665,0.00016759182,0.0015289264,0.00077464344,0.0012716327,0.00006360196,0.0000064928945,0.000018038896,0.026422447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826777,0.0003009036,0.00023735646,0.00027639235,0.00026709275,0.0006504675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985984,0.0002324459,0.00013089123,0.0003073318,0.000102009224,0.00062895205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049289,0.00010885692,0.0001772377,0.000017827844,0.00031252555,0.0000972831,0.00049122376,0.00020616011,0.000076022545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000437905,0.0001687554,0.0000614209,0.00042740259,0.00041521108,0.00021590028,0.000081957915,0.0003310271,0.00008709255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035543342,0.00008188761,0.0122364545,0.000058651134,0.000014215968,0.00008505051,0.026821073,0.0006606031,0.00007321153,0.9423367,0.014235542,0.003393079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000166392,0.000027313397,0.0066164974,0.00008698532,0.000028537404,0.00006291384,0.003471177,0.0012915834,0.00019252513,0.044017226,0.9437765,0.00026236306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8981154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9176359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92954093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003961153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012739376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021813902","doi":"10.1108/eb026012","title":"Australia and Canada: The Role of Policy in Professional Liability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Contributory negligence; Strict liability; Tort; Res ipsa loquitur; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.02291332743394586,"score_gpt":0.33912614977126115,"score_spread":0.3162128223373153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021813902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886199,0.0000783573,0.0000020074901,0.006763121,0.00010898165,0.00006995422,0.000004695444,8.0487166e-7,0.0043521593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874693,0.000029171939,0.000033929795,0.00009286222,0.0003615096,0.0000012765862,8.972262e-8,0.0000013180746,0.0007328912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932957,0.00006368506,0.00022870436,0.00004205637,0.00021798648,0.00011798677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995663,0.0000781736,0.00015151876,0.0000524805,0.00009507246,0.00005641492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005582468,0.00003382028,0.000096459335,0.00002835432,0.00013542628,0.000008990961,0.000150279,0.00003619978,0.000029367173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004542532,0.000022652099,0.000027317185,0.00016418188,0.00011841556,0.00007930312,0.000021367647,0.00015741681,4.3984772e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007112746,0.00017828796,0.37045336,0.000009040936,0.000005416827,0.000009939865,0.0057230587,0.000015253221,0.0010182546,0.60850877,0.004565786,0.009441742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007926316,0.0000133173,0.66914207,0.000010914274,0.000002894107,0.0000026609478,0.0005546184,0.0000014899615,0.00009839244,0.010508863,0.31956148,0.000024029947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8112602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7794105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5979999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012471432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022763081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4038073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023380777","doi":"10.7202/042230ar","title":"Les pouvoirs de l'exécuteur testamentaire : étendue maximale et durée","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Executor; Settlor; Estate; Administration (probate law); Duty; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.016756865764918083,"score_gpt":0.3040120960095668,"score_spread":0.2872552302446487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023380777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7844936,0.00014250906,0.004887935,0.026497941,0.000043098113,0.000252372,0.000038187565,0.00022028177,0.18342407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682644,0.00014467679,0.004910821,0.0024370048,0.00026409037,0.000049432,0.0000109890325,0.00002029218,0.0238983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882984,0.00009391694,0.00015964464,0.00022508616,0.00022265779,0.00046886495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999371,0.000109376684,0.00006801889,0.00020195026,0.00003582458,0.00021381189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046649968,0.00011150686,0.00011733804,0.0000474173,0.000758103,0.000120939956,0.00034545266,0.00018997297,0.00026666487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010178742,0.00012286904,0.00009135433,0.00021161643,0.00039211448,0.00018931412,0.000038202255,0.00034686417,0.00014515674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076221118,0.00010817391,0.0076150983,0.000009489232,0.000021682308,0.000012644065,0.015383239,0.00013233964,0.0012071633,0.92599505,0.0051215664,0.044385947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024745092,0.00002196544,0.016864464,0.000015151765,0.000026546777,0.000010529239,0.006464063,0.0002422975,0.00062729546,0.016207099,0.9590257,0.00024743818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004412837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005034999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95390415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010532973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019679325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6670919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025702348","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v2n2p42","title":"Discussion about Shareholders’ Right to Information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Business; Corporate law; Prosperity; Limited liability; Law and economics; Accounting; Shareholder resolution; Law; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.017385467989230748,"score_gpt":0.31065536442858027,"score_spread":0.29326989643934953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025702348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2534205,0.00012639578,0.0027755306,0.21761751,0.00035512922,0.00027754222,0.00004125932,0.000024186364,0.52536196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959518,0.000027678414,0.00038818302,0.002930224,0.00021853548,2.7517152e-7,7.051096e-7,9.026453e-7,0.0004817051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995497,0.000012748847,0.00015887112,0.000022271845,0.00014973737,0.00010670164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996188,0.000011676034,0.00007840267,0.000037189908,0.0000837072,0.0001702209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001807983,0.0000288352,0.000055930086,0.000030284893,0.00026572094,0.000116801006,0.000074843476,0.000025548601,0.00003790196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027588354,0.000017295735,0.000026991056,0.000054047858,0.00003367958,0.000360551,0.000008594236,0.00006114793,0.000008156318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010789778,0.000010852015,0.000029608811,0.0000011919185,0.0000013971389,4.6641964e-7,0.0035216457,0.0000038944795,0.000027414295,0.99214137,0.0020369415,0.002224133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000856594,0.000045832483,0.0036155952,0.000018385565,0.000005167765,0.0000023844987,0.0007847905,0.000007398697,0.000060684713,0.03048174,0.9648573,0.00003505221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021785808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007574028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96282035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029062214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004364486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20437376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026074531","doi":"10.1017/s0009840x05000995","title":"(A.) Smith (ed.) The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity. Essays in Honour of Peter Brown. Pp. xiv + 249, ills. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 2005. Cased, £45. ISBN: 0-9543845-8-X.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Classical Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; History; Classics; Environmental ethics; Theology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03280561441923194,"score_gpt":0.307295318945922,"score_spread":0.2744897045266901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026074531","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08919019,0.31400347,0.000109157576,0.51120514,0.00017193175,0.004810354,0.00018225465,0.00007460042,0.0802529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82338464,0.17016596,0.00009361795,0.0013880981,0.00032706247,0.00014017594,0.0000042764627,0.000024550114,0.0044716103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972788,0.00085015077,0.0006503173,0.00030924386,0.00048378858,0.00042771906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801725,0.0010091608,0.00029149742,0.00052266964,0.00007814883,0.000081256316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025436836,0.00019861694,0.0005113268,0.000011645899,0.00032307414,0.000052347114,0.00075025216,0.00013723651,0.0000777884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021758437,0.00009542192,0.00025955707,0.00041050176,0.0015771438,0.000123296,0.00022477144,0.0006440905,0.00001567914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006348928,0.0012921056,0.001041752,0.0017421044,0.0001036637,0.000016783228,0.0048500896,0.00014276424,0.00028870712,0.74330044,0.218245,0.028913077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003824209,0.000026447617,0.0062023243,0.00096650596,0.000111883484,0.0000039716433,0.00019600912,0.00039044814,0.000035841396,0.00977101,0.98172617,0.00018695206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012496971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026179352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7634812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075702854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019437332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58110523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026323366","doi":"10.7202/042225ar","title":"L'abus de pouvoirs du mandataire en droit civil québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"FLAGS register; Mandate; Law; Political science; Liability; Legal liability; Administration (probate law); Scope (computer science); Property (philosophy); Civil code; Civil procedure; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.006091021235612999,"score_gpt":0.24631067048906913,"score_spread":0.24021964925345612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026323366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8277386,0.00018071652,0.00935377,0.017787449,0.00007329563,0.0002668508,0.00004636924,0.0002487657,0.1443042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980525,0.0002760081,0.0016360205,0.0016489779,0.0007819838,0.00004718322,0.000016995798,0.000021710557,0.015046086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986957,0.00008850661,0.00017993672,0.000256818,0.00025682827,0.00052224443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992046,0.00014691167,0.00006999576,0.00027547416,0.000041056413,0.00026199978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060397765,0.00011800144,0.00014094534,0.000054874512,0.0008025994,0.00011479414,0.00051044684,0.0002405751,0.00033168498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016829056,0.0001353893,0.00010515653,0.00024090562,0.00038377888,0.00021610512,0.000045568842,0.00033681153,0.000216495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011495121,0.00009192454,0.0051286994,0.000012129146,0.000033770502,0.000016870632,0.045130484,0.00019948672,0.00025150005,0.8887802,0.007430661,0.052912783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002330286,0.000013867268,0.0073964046,0.000011525678,0.000029761637,0.000009462695,0.0064372174,0.00035606153,0.00016504215,0.02170933,0.96340823,0.00023008535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024267785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13505688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95597756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016570598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036790967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027430988","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2005.tb00270.x","title":"Revisiting pure economic loss: lessons to be learnt from the Supreme Court of Canada?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; CLARITY; Law; Transparency (behavior); Common law; Position (finance); Test (biology); Convergence (economics); Political science; High Court; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.05625833674962344,"score_gpt":0.33725167220055585,"score_spread":0.2809933354509324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027430988","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3490145,0.0015543543,0.000016200984,0.6197709,0.00010926947,0.00020593322,0.00012545886,0.000021706364,0.029181689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482185,0.0002637971,0.00015703254,0.0018740036,0.0009081327,0.000021036287,0.0000018104713,0.00000537058,0.0019469487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922323,0.000048563285,0.00017780306,0.00015208121,0.00018027569,0.00021805627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993925,0.0002553671,0.00007289678,0.0001554502,0.000062915635,0.000060841012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030660222,0.00007160673,0.00015607828,0.0000072620155,0.0008001767,0.000043784494,0.00027658665,0.000022479611,0.00007571367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014727144,0.00005323659,0.000041099986,0.00007234022,0.00013726857,0.00008431061,0.00011913158,0.0000947924,0.000018625535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010550184,0.000025590805,0.0078762565,0.000011270782,0.00024233291,0.0000026458147,0.043833293,0.0017746777,0.00012592443,0.7093555,0.2248002,0.011941783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004742361,0.000003910258,0.0053158216,0.00001559002,0.000014846529,1.0384714e-7,0.014068081,0.000016642593,0.000087458946,0.0002720371,0.9800866,0.0000714494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6996727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96772313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75528646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003001332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003487528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6154393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027593453","doi":"10.7202/042331ar","title":"Le droit de recours de l'entrepreneur contre l'ingénieur ou l'architecte à la lumière d'arrêts récents de la Cour suprême","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Supreme court; Law; Action (physics); Political science","score_opus":0.006160706500207325,"score_gpt":0.26485359837522,"score_spread":0.25869289187501265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027593453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9130966,0.00016250444,0.0067219436,0.0071973894,0.000051070707,0.00030998557,0.000057238154,0.00025221804,0.07215101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97845143,0.00020882708,0.0033642314,0.0009986919,0.00045668735,0.00006934567,0.0000128809115,0.00004608519,0.016391804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975047,0.000510023,0.00027522398,0.00040741454,0.00033034728,0.0009722998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984779,0.0004932455,0.0001431274,0.00033179604,0.000059340393,0.0004945958],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013723926,0.00020083135,0.00024258623,0.00009081173,0.0008593669,0.0002553665,0.0006576046,0.00042744755,0.00009241391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036793048,0.00024856837,0.00018993852,0.00029093178,0.0006730218,0.00017382161,0.00006335364,0.0007077257,0.000064300424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007178025,0.0004094151,0.077878244,0.00003282948,0.00011876147,0.000091649,0.029711483,0.0018643193,0.002578925,0.83447146,0.0049808742,0.047790263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018147168,0.000049669507,0.07272841,0.0000975375,0.00014810402,0.000107447755,0.008740778,0.0031211616,0.0022027588,0.09142395,0.81872785,0.00083759613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011726705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012496305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.813747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00118902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095296395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027966761","doi":"10.1504/ijcg.2008.020631","title":"Regal (Hastings) v. Gulliver: An equitable principle stretched too far?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Corporate Governance","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Scope (computer science); Fiduciary; Law and economics; Law; Rescission; Corporate governance; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; Business; Economics; Management; Computer science; Duty","score_opus":0.0789317348325333,"score_gpt":0.34044659435106506,"score_spread":0.26151485951853176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027966761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702222,0.00026775757,0.0036862274,0.005310599,0.001047825,0.00012350244,0.00007264039,0.00003742228,0.019231843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98964906,0.00084541703,0.0025606889,0.00044850845,0.001091358,0.0000038492735,0.0000056701992,0.00001364501,0.005381788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977595,0.00007664483,0.0005092823,0.00017483777,0.0011962467,0.00028348024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967743,0.000069241214,0.0015874915,0.00016092099,0.0012085834,0.0001994441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006734593,0.00011928686,0.00018886717,0.00004924136,0.00034957667,0.00012994334,0.0010810354,0.00007196207,0.00026763513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029589146,0.000114065435,0.00011679205,0.0002041375,0.00024144168,0.0012100948,0.00010687311,0.000256143,0.000050653693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003576606,0.0006663175,0.04792193,0.000006682226,0.00020627622,0.00059338595,0.006953207,0.0020243241,0.0044878623,0.9083687,0.0152036585,0.013209976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010907304,0.00017183645,0.045853794,0.000056477904,0.00002108326,0.0002165935,0.00060481013,0.0005394627,0.0012966298,0.008725214,0.9411143,0.00030905945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008810959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042152064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92591065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034189931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079367805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46514535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028132958","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebt012","title":"Protection Against Unilateral Dispositions of the Family Home - An Irish Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Irish; Legislature; Veto; Law; Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Family law; Political science; Common law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.027985795494629186,"score_gpt":0.3344826306900675,"score_spread":0.3064968351954383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028132958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89730346,0.000083215644,0.00020376698,0.036523793,0.00028158783,0.00026397844,0.000026880756,0.0000071913546,0.06530611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699736,0.00013971482,0.000053207717,0.0017422094,0.00074705074,0.000012143756,7.2885695e-7,0.000004566539,0.00030300042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906474,0.00017558664,0.00023511564,0.000067032044,0.00035616395,0.00010134485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891245,0.000076900986,0.00025798052,0.00009268486,0.0005990675,0.000060895865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034650383,0.000059658665,0.00009586401,0.000054527136,0.00039330832,0.00014765689,0.00047070038,0.00003851593,0.0000078012345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000732583,0.000033764394,0.00010852772,0.00012043146,0.0006514544,0.00044583803,0.00005731583,0.00017547091,0.0000034571715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033579738,0.000053010826,0.00008416304,8.3763535e-7,0.0000582831,4.2140346e-7,0.007343091,0.000061326165,0.0025348214,0.9889832,0.00017422799,0.00067302847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031674907,0.00017635185,0.16502,0.00016243091,0.00008657471,0.000044793247,0.025982376,0.00074377557,0.0005621483,0.6842901,0.11946988,0.0002940263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04346543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005526343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30469307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012319435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016042002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028974913","doi":"10.1002/iir.161","title":"Piercing the veneer of the trust in the South African Trust Law: Liability of trustees of a business trust for fraudulent trading","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Blind trust; Express trust; Settlor; Business; Trust law; Debt; Estate planning; Liability; Law; Testamentary trust; Law and economics; Embezzlement; Finance; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.07837643684443923,"score_gpt":0.33755742409375594,"score_spread":0.2591809872493167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028974913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.875901,0.015844308,0.0005505247,0.032111604,0.00067044806,0.0042164996,0.00037546468,0.000021970385,0.07030823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955853,0.0035750351,0.00013049594,0.00030180087,0.00010466174,0.00016671866,0.0000035334492,0.0000066363114,0.00012580912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838316,0.0001866654,0.0006345488,0.00015830966,0.00049587263,0.00014146556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850345,0.00036475965,0.0004511313,0.00034604414,0.00031356554,0.00002102582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012704381,0.000096650656,0.00027972067,0.000029313529,0.00023964545,0.000012712151,0.0011080726,0.000042777094,0.000085213105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006771846,0.000051563326,0.0002468819,0.00047590278,0.00054725603,0.00011023868,0.000058913305,0.00012985342,8.753268e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003714076,0.000635984,0.04859502,0.001342714,0.000090815585,6.1088764e-7,0.056850627,0.00020229496,0.00018100263,0.8844564,0.0006336221,0.0069737984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080145994,0.000070875074,0.329938,0.0037578042,0.00021545838,0.0000074916275,0.0073639643,0.0009840156,0.0004669376,0.013850757,0.6422106,0.0003326524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022362084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058197277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8706056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007365635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018306162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33804932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030020203","doi":"10.7202/042951ar","title":"L'hypothèque de la chose d'autrui","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009746233914594166,"score_gpt":0.27463347538476296,"score_spread":0.2648872414701688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030020203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5982089,0.0036669928,0.008916677,0.026695952,0.00020493743,0.00023171832,0.000047863203,0.00012972257,0.36189723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81800044,0.0014278075,0.0062524895,0.0022085207,0.0013522726,0.00004169848,0.000004576119,0.000026398364,0.17068581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842995,0.00025246575,0.0002073455,0.00026575624,0.00020931636,0.0006351856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989305,0.00035261342,0.00008801725,0.00025577022,0.000033532615,0.00033955587],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008121025,0.00015109256,0.0001615733,0.000041128747,0.0006462993,0.0001847973,0.00042063315,0.0005391299,0.00092434837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014782985,0.00018292472,0.00015104844,0.00034999888,0.001457538,0.00025499682,0.00003966714,0.0006754451,0.0006295835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039509287,0.00010805558,0.00060387736,0.000015348594,0.000023053783,0.00000947569,0.013117443,0.00026873098,0.0002061532,0.8911196,0.005523475,0.08900086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020453356,0.000014028785,0.0031610872,0.000024701974,0.000042880678,0.000015828706,0.0012543985,0.00084685936,0.00036950692,0.07837819,0.9154749,0.00021310941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028604416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012563335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9099514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018855864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032683837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030095932","doi":"10.1093/arbitration/29.4.641","title":"Retrial Ruling of the Supreme People's Court Settles the Disputes on the Jurisdiction over Joint Tort Cases - Litigation or Arbitration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arbitration International","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Arbitration clause; Supreme court; Law; Jurisdiction; Dispute resolution; Federal Arbitration Act; Tort; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Tribunal; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.03838454261180092,"score_gpt":0.30141069476202464,"score_spread":0.26302615215022374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030095932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8687787,0.000013980315,0.0011531336,0.096948184,0.0014034727,0.0012340108,0.00006385774,0.000059689366,0.030344963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960318,0.000032107793,0.00008889014,0.001562176,0.0011376435,0.00019927225,0.00004021288,0.000008891927,0.00089898333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826396,0.00020722223,0.0003997073,0.00018561228,0.00079876,0.00014476807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983763,0.00067539496,0.00032317892,0.00025290687,0.00033425112,0.000037975162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006253076,0.00010683188,0.00008985709,0.000041337164,0.000939983,0.00028445316,0.0003897273,0.0000766078,0.0008476376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081966934,0.000054632517,0.000118806245,0.00027057857,0.00021939927,0.00047669173,0.000044962697,0.00018908748,0.00003887012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003951393,0.00009965669,0.0040738247,0.0000044320977,0.00005232188,1.934631e-7,0.006181448,0.0003495066,0.0051859366,0.96771544,0.01596722,0.00033052344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001520035,0.000276247,0.677284,0.0002774246,0.0001666886,0.00002112602,0.012010893,0.0369062,0.022937434,0.077264994,0.17061125,0.00072373694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037328105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006145025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001378332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023294607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92810374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030259643","doi":"10.1163/20512996-90000098","title":"Aristotle and the Law Courts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polis The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Politics; Citizenship; Rhetoric; Element (criminal law); Political science; Pride; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01985774532822391,"score_gpt":0.3139814184096376,"score_spread":0.2941236730814137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030259643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33053824,0.0038837825,0.0026828048,0.23685311,0.0008248737,0.0011606589,0.00011273251,0.000069432055,0.42387438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303484,0.00011543332,0.00013177021,0.0025766469,0.0013577079,0.000011879087,0.0000011940017,0.000007903377,0.002762616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880636,0.0001521453,0.0002009042,0.00010006669,0.00024402958,0.0004964912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897933,0.00053646247,0.00006838575,0.00011960247,0.00007482714,0.00022138626],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013752016,0.00008536383,0.00012407909,0.000018175118,0.0033000016,0.00022600395,0.00020465645,0.000048527498,0.000012716011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085308246,0.000041671487,0.00007875527,0.000075398624,0.0011669013,0.00010680405,0.000061611834,0.00017867294,0.0000045267893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001784794,0.000021653635,0.00009767436,0.000002954744,0.0000059532695,6.805648e-7,0.0007440998,0.0000011716071,0.000018284833,0.9947094,0.004288304,0.000092030496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003877041,0.00001541532,0.0016107457,0.000005322644,0.000039800452,0.000048442133,0.00075495377,0.00010203618,0.000022261176,0.428238,0.5687181,0.000057244677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004866226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013868372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6624966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043726595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005539184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031179565","doi":"10.2979/gls.2007.14.2.235","title":"Civil Society Constitutionalism: The Power of Contract Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Public law; Commercial law; Tort; Delict; Social contract; Comparative law; Civil society; Private law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Black letter law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03140292766371281,"score_gpt":0.3616155692381673,"score_spread":0.33021264157445446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031179565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5206243,0.02074736,0.00070066727,0.041221507,0.001274228,0.00036690757,0.00013685407,0.000023631404,0.41490453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979851,0.00038454065,0.00019665179,0.0010474524,0.00032170856,8.836155e-7,1.9690638e-7,0.0000020571572,0.00006136474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987043,0.00004461282,0.00041975873,0.00007128071,0.00052442343,0.00023563602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985427,0.00029055946,0.00039855562,0.00008334644,0.000593174,0.00009163795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017166914,0.000079997975,0.00021600642,0.000009501026,0.00073145685,0.00004566917,0.00031088816,0.000056548153,0.000037192753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002280271,0.000050946957,0.00023893132,0.0002657958,0.0016764209,0.00022850171,0.000048432736,0.00017927725,0.000005775095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001722418,0.000051264837,0.004353822,0.0000031848695,0.00025212168,0.000013359581,0.0041041495,0.00000948329,0.000022082071,0.983765,0.007121365,0.00028691543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034834584,0.000057287292,0.022048721,0.00004193682,0.00006822572,0.000031561653,0.016298832,3.6868238e-7,0.000063972264,0.008722212,0.95222497,0.00009355626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028431255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01341459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025134019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003623475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7485656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034908739","doi":"10.7202/1028140ar","title":"Protecting Possession, a Question of Values? A Comparative Inquiry into the Moralization of Possession in Brazil and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Law; Appeal; Adverse possession; Faith; Common law; Political science; Sociology; Land tenure; Land law; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.045600319507659984,"score_gpt":0.3516760804273876,"score_spread":0.30607576091972766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034908739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953189,0.00008842083,0.0007714316,0.0013716705,0.000040113202,0.00035380936,0.0000020827206,0.00000817628,0.002045397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992982,0.000023551873,0.00047620296,0.000035270565,0.00006000853,0.00002796228,0.000004269197,0.0000035181206,0.000070997536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991784,0.00023542122,0.00020957897,0.00010428904,0.0001682447,0.000104043495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994006,0.00009367791,0.00018772071,0.00010342292,0.00015686855,0.000057692414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008587052,0.00003966591,0.00012386167,0.000032930457,0.00015348267,0.000016661197,0.00011383521,0.000044922734,0.0000025987151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000320101,0.00004024049,0.000013117085,0.00029440006,0.00013711197,0.00013055801,0.00003703685,0.00009736825,3.0042528e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083820516,0.00018991285,0.21981291,0.00027334638,0.00001977507,0.000004644138,0.5346382,0.0045582294,0.0066462513,0.22826548,0.00073956104,0.0047678724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019459646,0.00027162375,0.36273554,0.0022247334,0.00007703149,0.000016247634,0.30750066,0.022541571,0.0147076305,0.28236678,0.0049129366,0.0006992888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7119222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67609936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22713755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022119298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055278675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32981098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035728806","doi":"10.1108/13590790310808727","title":"Preventing corporate failure: the Cadbury Committee’s corporate governance report","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit committee; Corporate governance; Stock exchange; Audit; Enforcement; Business; Chief audit executive; Internal audit; Finance; Joint audit; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06757351824286159,"score_gpt":0.2882434556933058,"score_spread":0.2206699374504442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035728806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82903516,0.002883949,0.0020909389,0.061420403,0.0023492104,0.00077557674,0.0000375689,0.00008001127,0.10132715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878285,0.0002510033,0.000721968,0.00044183127,0.0014711899,0.0000053566323,6.9580227e-7,0.000011449974,0.009268041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982788,0.00014215836,0.0006325334,0.00013218343,0.0005257038,0.00028865063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648416,0.0001046468,0.0026804924,0.00023718929,0.00037154768,0.00012195269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016153754,0.00011067391,0.00022378004,0.000026573513,0.00082811766,0.00013379194,0.0005434507,0.0000915826,0.00021325012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007614386,0.00008152053,0.00017674477,0.00039415064,0.0002538668,0.0003716085,0.00005735934,0.00046551944,0.0000629657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039022347,0.00036830353,0.01690084,0.000023393046,0.00005174439,0.00089282874,0.0073769353,0.00008707589,0.001260388,0.49141008,0.45982176,0.021767622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024296083,0.000049557446,0.047343913,0.00005028623,0.000043655462,0.0001573416,0.00026085254,0.000036632333,0.00017997097,0.012061362,0.93941665,0.00015682614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041823412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005785394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47959486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011277676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030791733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6369295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036475377","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-008","title":"Corporate Fiduciary Duties and Prudential Regulation of Financial Institutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Corporation; Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Corporate law; Shareholder; Liability; Law; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.09868123007834605,"score_gpt":0.35699083718970587,"score_spread":0.2583096071113598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036475377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7972743,0.00012557991,0.023202205,0.003960727,0.00039382698,0.00037493586,0.000025007554,0.000063007144,0.17458041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991659,0.00001560291,0.0004404807,0.000113153204,0.00015396638,0.000013080997,0.000005235125,0.0000031928384,0.000089410816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992749,0.000106436004,0.00018517477,0.0001104297,0.00018663258,0.00013640728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995786,0.00007531753,0.000065540815,0.000109630855,0.00008958907,0.0000813043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005920989,0.000053214077,0.000106798405,0.00002931533,0.00018454777,0.00003548235,0.00011631272,0.00008200496,0.00007901354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035303916,0.000049999264,0.000018028231,0.0001887694,0.0385262,0.00019129367,0.00007973522,0.00008064388,0.000007473385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022463884,0.00003373397,0.0004971514,0.0000041798994,0.0000012598354,5.092889e-7,0.004581972,0.000024787843,0.00005549368,0.9944305,0.00015180775,0.0001961804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017865979,0.000025834961,0.00075113296,0.000014731258,0.000006991772,5.5902046e-7,0.00082710234,0.000066855035,0.00042933188,0.98219943,0.015431974,0.00006738336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015211737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027196668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20189157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036720005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022597765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9640904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037167014","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.969","title":"A Role For Tort In Pre-Contractual Negotiations? An Examination Of English, French, And Canadian Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Plaintiff; Mistake; Law; Tort; Negotiation; Database transaction; Business; Liability; Certainty; Unjust enrichment; Work (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Restitution; Economics","score_opus":0.0275917556304269,"score_gpt":0.30762062844209864,"score_spread":0.28002887281167177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037167014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84804565,0.000046660756,0.00018045945,0.00017618803,0.00008676441,0.0002990803,0.00007154626,0.000008222957,0.1510854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991527,0.0000027828996,0.00029235258,0.00009884635,0.0000892932,0.00007559464,0.000026839249,0.0000021488422,0.00025939944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994109,0.0000745353,0.00015738561,0.00013888003,0.00010835715,0.00010993241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994331,0.000118043354,0.000055416458,0.000048006023,0.00025371902,0.00009171824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022418809,0.00005730249,0.00009258857,0.000043784017,0.00017410444,0.00007737699,0.00008201019,0.00003945546,0.000030411647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022025146,0.00005896235,0.000015382813,0.000053117157,0.00014945256,0.00038856087,0.0000025968702,0.00004579159,7.2380493e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037134876,0.00004569162,0.00081288035,0.0000012324779,0.000007983462,8.1374075e-8,0.063400336,0.0000062363065,0.000049891994,0.934678,0.000014095257,0.0009798319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013218065,0.00047673806,0.282361,0.000026829966,0.000017957676,0.0000011156116,0.035070796,0.0023773096,0.00029400707,0.098381296,0.5793568,0.0003143516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21007884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8453054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83629674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050907587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007282939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79518133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037372397","doi":"10.1017/s000819730327639x","title":"<i>Corporate Governance in Australia and New Zealand.</i> By J<scp>ohn</scp> F<scp>arrar</scp>. [Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001. xxvi, 472 and (Appendices and Index) 52 pp. Paperback £33.99. ISBN 0–19–551314–2.]","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Corporate governance; Exaggeration; Jurisdiction; Index (typography); Position (finance); Political science; China; Scope (computer science); Law; Management; Economics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.032420022928021944,"score_gpt":0.2548486047052972,"score_spread":0.22242858177727526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037372397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.924738,0.0036056875,0.00008175348,0.0029395912,0.00018762815,0.00050705334,0.00021134091,0.000044482957,0.06768449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9060211,0.035887472,0.00019830522,0.0006121984,0.0003048197,0.0000044685266,0.000009732024,0.000029105533,0.056932755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764967,0.00037123202,0.00035828937,0.00041086992,0.0004552547,0.00075471087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980635,0.00038621115,0.00055483554,0.00024293142,0.00007146097,0.000681054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012250071,0.00028652046,0.000340049,0.000025679077,0.0014183201,0.0005136606,0.00048622972,0.00019134123,0.000021712332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016065562,0.00023941047,0.000067989866,0.00036274866,0.00070017326,0.00084538775,0.00015083922,0.0007214286,0.000005248802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025888481,0.00010980517,0.07219135,0.00003253229,0.00008977108,0.00007418142,0.003440032,0.00006823856,0.00030279893,0.32801947,0.5949556,0.0006903425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00110595,0.000052484713,0.019721875,0.000043823133,0.000053120075,0.00010227263,0.0026590144,0.00003701935,0.00010149165,0.0019982103,0.97401744,0.00010727766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017990801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006492205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37906185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013543804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020686505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037793309","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1109","title":"The Canadian Constructive Trust and the French Negotiorum Gestio: Two Institutions Serving one Same Legal Concept ?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Unjust enrichment; Law; Common law; Political science; Constructive; Doctrine; Equity (law); Tort; Lien; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law; Liability; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.014031420408215221,"score_gpt":0.3074975607740451,"score_spread":0.2934661403658299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037793309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11937779,0.01142148,0.0017782345,0.22365305,0.0014211884,0.0016606393,0.00074482535,0.00020536687,0.6397374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976845,0.0003644269,0.0007452707,0.0006138366,0.00026128886,0.00004579069,0.0000058108976,0.0000032382843,0.0002758783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988712,0.00008731281,0.00017475171,0.0002117838,0.00025249194,0.00040242475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999279,0.00010631734,0.00008966064,0.00019040772,0.0001225417,0.00021207561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027648205,0.000108393775,0.00012503931,0.00001335568,0.005571748,0.00043289692,0.00038907467,0.000049977985,0.000016092805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018529259,0.000072962604,0.000046202207,0.00036562208,0.0037874852,0.00040988566,0.00006423721,0.00017208635,0.000019414692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040219716,0.000007711476,0.0016404248,0.0000010788942,0.000011965144,0.0000013492412,0.001016929,0.00037133798,4.878636e-7,0.9909006,0.00009043783,0.005953699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008770808,0.000011238765,0.015921826,0.000020050054,0.00003198888,0.000009749386,0.005094524,0.000018560968,0.00000551796,0.16202714,0.8158261,0.00015619928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75354165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9772022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8783067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050336315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015142378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038570877","doi":"10.1017/s0714980800001537","title":"On Liberty for the Old","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre; Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Mill; Relevance (law); Negative liberty; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Autonomy; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.024881238993907425,"score_gpt":0.24879642766053683,"score_spread":0.2239151886666294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038570877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2898335,0.0012561202,0.0006459716,0.563372,0.003306302,0.0018457939,0.00021969511,0.00006924742,0.13945135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773709,0.00023369819,0.00007413479,0.006104439,0.0010054958,0.00007757014,0.0000032343683,0.0000253212,0.015105213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985844,0.00009427167,0.00023607716,0.00021644967,0.00011375875,0.00075506535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976796,0.00046092903,0.00011915524,0.00027825852,0.00013048496,0.0013315695],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096860214,0.00014193576,0.00013542495,0.0001414003,0.0027522242,0.00038084178,0.00054061384,0.0000626772,0.0010057201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040026466,0.00011043293,0.00013582979,0.0002481499,0.00013491756,0.000090020265,0.000008149809,0.0003282825,0.000062648505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033651686,0.000029332226,0.00035138818,0.000009085746,0.00005071113,0.000080003934,0.018364018,0.0007601678,0.0000063622924,0.82172626,0.13351992,0.025099356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019799534,0.00005653474,0.000877502,0.0000780421,0.000021576609,0.000018903876,0.0013170581,0.000626917,0.0000035492237,0.0019729768,0.99467236,0.00015659077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07923256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7776609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010598269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030087162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040771768","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpp123","title":"Respect for the commercial meaning of franchise restrictive covenants: do the UK and Canada diverge?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goodwill; Appeal; Meaning (existential); Covenant; Convention; Position (finance); Franchise; Law and economics; Law; Raising (metalworking); Business; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Marketing; Engineering; Finance; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03634100098975821,"score_gpt":0.3155342543875744,"score_spread":0.27919325339781614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040771768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1438995,0.007995092,0.007920655,0.46675998,0.0015139137,0.0034308576,0.000077665354,0.00003101704,0.36837134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567264,0.00084674126,0.0003200392,0.002505048,0.00036896925,0.0000041583403,1.7090431e-7,0.000005365996,0.00027684728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858916,0.00031612482,0.00036068412,0.000095641306,0.00046037076,0.0001780337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991665,0.0069599734,0.00049212924,0.00013970495,0.0006688435,0.00007433785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018429805,0.000084437524,0.00016794776,0.000018537554,0.0012978977,0.00014605308,0.00043396384,0.000042007334,0.00005164037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011213321,0.00003579006,0.00007088709,0.00019272183,0.00027008858,0.0004005084,0.000045162928,0.0004118656,9.4380226e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006231864,0.0005836725,0.00036423898,0.00002322945,0.00067213376,0.000027509117,0.1505787,0.0005575672,0.00075437315,0.57239896,0.17355421,0.09425354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003086454,0.00039384104,0.0004244605,0.000036699028,0.00013458476,0.000022638455,0.019653,0.00008123253,0.00022047138,0.0016626432,0.9769798,0.000082020706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44828916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35789156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85177314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013316229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009088086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042208543","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1127","title":"Facts on the Ground and Reconciliation of Divergent Consumer Insolvency Philosophies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Debt; Debtor; Opposition (politics); Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.03783276758323504,"score_gpt":0.3068127772802049,"score_spread":0.26898000969696984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042208543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8190275,0.00012509138,0.000638446,0.014170752,0.000096473355,0.0002717701,0.000015997652,0.000022641365,0.16563137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935424,0.00008785206,0.000037987113,0.00033803825,0.00009216477,0.000017372966,0.0000024158876,0.0000036362253,0.00006628725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992797,0.0001255904,0.00017307133,0.000110497276,0.00017690782,0.00013424741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926674,0.00048909924,0.000047412777,0.00012649453,0.00004132036,0.000028903823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004547083,0.000058908,0.00009157898,0.000018221079,0.00025519475,0.000033370172,0.00012768424,0.0000545195,0.00023645531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015666358,0.000040358795,0.000022476448,0.000121659665,0.03138897,0.000077991404,0.000049863746,0.00008775972,0.000013088554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010727001,0.00004202134,0.0007067544,0.0000036100957,0.0000025703146,2.2593753e-7,0.0017488998,0.0000028195739,0.000050909446,0.9971671,0.00009106636,0.0001732975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008429482,0.000024206198,0.00096839195,0.000013752218,0.000005433774,1.0580562e-7,0.0007704923,0.000013433813,0.0005143095,0.98581743,0.011731724,0.000056445897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040734495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020671567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18032677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029642988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021158743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043582225","doi":"10.7202/042426ar","title":"L'incidence des privilèges et des hypothèques sur le régime légal de la société d'acquêts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Political science; General partnership; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Debt","score_opus":0.019312834794689697,"score_gpt":0.3040183266448632,"score_spread":0.2847054918501735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043582225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88618577,0.00046047295,0.009375943,0.0023293102,0.000019516829,0.00015356061,0.0000104307355,0.00019771785,0.101267256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97228277,0.0006917201,0.01692489,0.00080399984,0.0002693293,0.00004901685,0.0000030579365,0.000022023305,0.00895322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856174,0.00026262674,0.00017485369,0.00024039003,0.000243786,0.00051662594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886215,0.0005773807,0.00007972065,0.0001877692,0.000081712526,0.00021128709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011266319,0.00012919583,0.00014892257,0.00004402631,0.0010908038,0.00028225844,0.00043638505,0.00023622115,0.00011435225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005839125,0.00013907628,0.000108680055,0.00020992987,0.0019133039,0.0005430548,0.00005308589,0.0003303247,0.000053801876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098973605,0.00017757787,0.012658011,0.000021314465,0.000029580968,0.000008809123,0.046197545,0.00023448175,0.0023574438,0.89144593,0.0013899587,0.045469455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053521595,0.0000484011,0.098142244,0.00007397145,0.00004906322,0.000025269499,0.008302236,0.00035097156,0.0066418373,0.48557535,0.39967993,0.0005754978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006433102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013445059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40587056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001078962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061630696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97249687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044835123","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1117-3","title":"TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AND CRIMINALIZATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Criminalization; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Universal jurisdiction; Relation (database); Acknowledgement; Sociology; Computer security","score_opus":0.010797130379867416,"score_gpt":0.2385564415872736,"score_spread":0.2277593112074062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044835123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2981476,0.0003797721,0.0067375773,0.0042915684,0.0009528993,0.00027990644,0.0000062505133,0.000045741326,0.6891587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979632,0.00030863195,0.0006533847,0.000014973393,0.00036441587,4.416389e-8,6.223807e-7,0.0000012506678,0.0006934889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997077,0.00003615154,0.00004473778,0.000041752166,0.000106715845,0.00006293254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973005,0.000011165802,0.000056499666,0.00003119158,0.00009742953,0.00007366981],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000098933546,0.000022424956,0.000038761507,0.0000052641244,0.00074986595,0.000039429153,0.0000747261,0.000026776372,0.0009575172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000056899294,0.000024707022,0.000020804287,0.000010323589,0.000114061346,0.00058133824,0.000016437998,0.00003599826,0.0000052866667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001539635,0.00006110724,0.0019007784,0.0000060896623,0.000023059954,0.0000019155866,0.025682718,0.000007869309,0.000594124,0.9472193,0.010119583,0.014368035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025020872,0.0000306226,0.0098355375,0.00000833326,0.000022227889,0.0000025253414,0.014946924,0.00006053308,0.000017577815,0.0026360585,0.9721365,0.000052948577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30554697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11760999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96201694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010647523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027253182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045111124","doi":"10.1515/9780748697755-007","title":"3 Trust and Patrimony","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Express trust; Trust law; Blind trust; Appropriation; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Institution; Political science; Property rights; Common law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.021831177104682863,"score_gpt":0.24343889200057228,"score_spread":0.22160771489588943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045111124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056807816,0.00000961195,0.0006890684,0.00038414283,0.0000814362,0.000107339525,0.00000495997,0.000076024684,0.9418396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85083973,0.000026722626,0.00016746612,0.00005395168,0.00022620743,4.792886e-7,7.0356185e-7,0.0000025062086,0.14868224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995315,0.000042986125,0.000040012314,0.00013216217,0.00011326608,0.00014008592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965054,0.000060553644,0.00002955731,0.00010871259,0.000033786087,0.000116877694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018040424,0.000046061778,0.00006031818,0.00002396583,0.00053050934,0.000040398798,0.00016558003,0.00005345289,0.000032171014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023990355,0.00005083715,0.00002425533,0.000019076277,0.00019473328,0.000077291006,0.000085954016,0.000070905124,0.0000010629856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008224158,0.000011023984,0.00069301657,0.0000021831622,0.00000746611,0.0000016554704,0.0038553646,0.0000020211298,0.00007769025,0.97524226,0.009360487,0.010738622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016472793,0.0000080207155,0.00030716893,0.000002707282,0.000012283579,1.432524e-7,0.0008684125,0.00009009286,0.000044880737,0.0005446973,0.9978888,0.00006807437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038106798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014023286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027495587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029066934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57606333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046063052","doi":"10.7202/042251ar","title":"La Cour suprême, la fiducie d'investissement et le prospectus","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Prospectus; Damages; Supreme court; Law; Investment (military); Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.01067284982418912,"score_gpt":0.28525732206234383,"score_spread":0.2745844722381547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046063052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5566038,0.00017208744,0.0034770176,0.017910263,0.0000351839,0.00029567652,0.000018638011,0.00016697239,0.42132038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730299,0.000094088755,0.003296455,0.0008503307,0.000173261,0.00005771546,0.000005924433,0.000013048561,0.02247924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908096,0.000119071934,0.00012335912,0.00018481688,0.00020980195,0.00028201638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994655,0.00014142334,0.0000484164,0.0001651058,0.000030068464,0.00014946627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007485693,0.00007974652,0.00009042875,0.000028583312,0.0004519441,0.00013604686,0.000241538,0.00015189774,0.000103385835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011074455,0.0000857386,0.000054831948,0.00015783537,0.00042235796,0.00012679651,0.000026928628,0.0002837103,0.00008159199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019125666,0.00006594714,0.00053154066,0.000004110194,0.000008068095,0.0000038728895,0.007878435,0.00006332431,0.00021962197,0.9795089,0.0027285852,0.008985719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018209587,0.000008869428,0.0046658395,0.000007617889,0.000008993024,0.000003699445,0.0017536703,0.00007999649,0.00034745078,0.018856926,0.97396356,0.00012129605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002298507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034274212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.971235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036134658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025850785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34963185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046468978","doi":"10.7202/043631ar","title":"Les avantages du règlement consensuel en matière de réparation du préjudice corporel : le cas particulier de la transaction à paiements différés","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012162483719623663,"score_gpt":0.2835242516697323,"score_spread":0.27136176795010863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046468978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8496634,0.0005053045,0.07792094,0.036285177,0.00018071043,0.0005896825,0.00008844478,0.00010446638,0.034661904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97444373,0.0014882468,0.004015151,0.00077899854,0.0007528183,0.00014315844,0.00003224093,0.00003025712,0.018315395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772906,0.00060870533,0.00039537728,0.00033105095,0.00032004478,0.0006157467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988606,0.00041221356,0.00020463251,0.00019607453,0.00006482204,0.00026168308],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012004102,0.00021719189,0.00022238125,0.000053290394,0.0011029303,0.00017688147,0.00023713363,0.00043104385,0.00051558804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009105303,0.00026140586,0.0001456012,0.00020852099,0.00084752473,0.00028354098,0.000021260204,0.0004540902,0.00012787162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000965967,0.0012889105,0.02674455,0.00018435514,0.00032166688,0.000058442358,0.15778264,0.0046555335,0.01078642,0.6947499,0.009958644,0.09337232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016327455,0.000096595766,0.063183635,0.00011155787,0.00041493122,0.000081441096,0.017162876,0.020620696,0.005617403,0.019473692,0.8709412,0.00066322886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015643384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007948347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86098254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029444653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003029024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046575515","doi":"10.7202/042904ar","title":"Le locus standi dans les actions d'intérêt public et la relator action : l'empire de la common law en droit québécois","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; Political science; Legislature; Common law; Public law; Statutory law; Norm (philosophy); Civil code; Sociology","score_opus":0.018249627994041576,"score_gpt":0.31230903053315245,"score_spread":0.2940594025391109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046575515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66853034,0.000054801927,0.010591584,0.010757587,0.000039491777,0.00019863376,0.000040705185,0.00025649223,0.30953035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207073,0.00022670646,0.00092657143,0.000578778,0.00026542175,0.00008094581,0.00002050699,0.00003136342,0.0057989634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982892,0.0005159127,0.00021710004,0.00026571983,0.0002748293,0.00043719614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879915,0.0004911328,0.00011504305,0.00028467883,0.000047920792,0.00026210307],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010725495,0.00014078902,0.00016259635,0.00007500818,0.0015891034,0.00030027283,0.00036892653,0.00046784483,0.00006439898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011805188,0.00016649785,0.00013000378,0.0003187458,0.0008198819,0.0005081076,0.000043465272,0.0007930413,0.000037848986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070178544,0.00011884432,0.0021737902,0.000006597922,0.000027601158,0.0000035487533,0.017409785,0.00014013342,0.00088599214,0.9664338,0.00043630265,0.012356585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002560568,0.000016496362,0.0063334364,0.000012606847,0.000032918237,0.000015226728,0.0151715875,0.00013242236,0.00048213953,0.02905984,0.9482716,0.00021567015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07209742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43628797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94783527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018591047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007156548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050838610","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2007.0031","title":"Is Formalism inevitable?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Scholarship; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.017879355690791746,"score_gpt":0.27723399539297183,"score_spread":0.2593546397021801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050838610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030718176,0.00023681315,0.003925599,0.0020098668,0.00010150116,0.000052565523,0.0000061530204,0.000014277657,0.96293503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941593,0.00027330077,0.0018605229,0.00014065315,0.00014871544,6.273382e-9,3.881677e-7,0.0000017842393,0.0034153427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952054,0.00001798768,0.0000716049,0.000047567177,0.00018238089,0.0001599457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995876,0.00002299159,0.000083954095,0.00006300349,0.00010975705,0.00013270581],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005149855,0.000031125255,0.000058945436,0.000008057834,0.0010219871,0.00002023215,0.00022957566,0.000042186446,0.0020675866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006385785,0.000034319502,0.00006341927,0.0000264675,0.00014082824,0.00053497107,0.0000333051,0.000071397,0.000012297493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022681324,0.000048736234,0.0010553331,0.0000028390145,0.000021374319,0.000010971013,0.02458707,0.0000023576754,0.000120648925,0.9562634,0.0077580824,0.010106456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016781849,0.000012936475,0.0024592583,0.0000056033045,0.000010132862,0.0000028749243,0.020951224,0.0000035291894,0.000050850143,0.0008799815,0.9754119,0.000043872496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1986249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42091504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020432033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000516836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20517275","doi":"10.29173/alr98","title":"Personal Responsibility for Intentional Conduct: Protecting the Interests of Innocent Co-Insureds Under Insurance Contracts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Statutory law; Damages; Insurance policy; Business; Property insurance; False Claims Act; Law and economics; Liability insurance; Law; Casualty insurance; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science","score_opus":0.0843924987032427,"score_gpt":0.39410812407939455,"score_spread":0.3097156253761518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20517275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73134464,0.032603312,0.00042687476,0.147988,0.00039782235,0.015477042,0.00012096123,0.000063794665,0.071577564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491733,0.0012745457,0.00009217766,0.002404979,0.00006685173,0.00058653223,0.000008832001,0.0000072798216,0.00064146885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986216,0.00038830334,0.00037665828,0.00019720668,0.00021500788,0.00020124327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976367,0.0014627875,0.00022815351,0.0002165266,0.00039097047,0.00006490661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017743908,0.000091275266,0.00022288377,0.000009136283,0.00056339236,0.00004697016,0.0002813921,0.00004816519,0.00032042555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017931731,0.00006014681,0.0001384766,0.00017132281,0.00040784324,0.00019640075,0.00003602918,0.00019647225,0.000048553553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014998595,0.00013297745,0.000921639,0.0005154149,0.00005418857,5.4424994e-8,0.0015844416,4.3784533e-7,0.00031598753,0.987641,0.0022821086,0.006536773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029336626,0.00003673075,0.010996054,0.0010548446,0.000034663655,0.0000021702826,0.0005548146,0.000025530759,0.00014699053,0.0065417974,0.9801646,0.00014842847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018807536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011390333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005843922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001651251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98772633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053532955","doi":"10.7202/1019044ar","title":"Unauthorized Dispositions of Trust Property: Tracing in Quebec Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Trust law; Property law; Subrogation; Express trust; Private law; Constructive trust; Common law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Property rights; Sociology; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025638017804686802,"score_gpt":0.29157039951367225,"score_spread":0.2659323817089855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053532955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093938306,0.0000350814,0.00014522242,0.008978122,0.00013018855,0.0003696075,0.000022317305,0.000029484585,0.8963517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694693,0.000019888326,0.0006222628,0.0001333667,0.00011712829,0.00002425041,0.0000012444383,0.0000070728584,0.0021278674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990649,0.00011395139,0.00028710184,0.000094560026,0.000214606,0.00022488127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951893,0.00004380229,0.00010473828,0.000093307855,0.00010891962,0.00013030985],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036474076,0.00006248137,0.00012902507,0.000032976735,0.002141099,0.00010824445,0.00019131381,0.000056215595,0.00044924434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024327861,0.000043559063,0.000070643066,0.00019090343,0.00020612066,0.00050810166,0.000022985732,0.0002189914,0.00004518114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033175465,0.00008097484,0.00011453048,0.0000034879151,0.0000061476694,0.0000019445267,0.0011582599,0.000026078218,0.00072995236,0.99292254,0.00006468001,0.004888078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005114974,0.00003013746,0.0019731584,0.00007750141,0.000015936328,0.000008742612,0.00404423,0.0001300149,0.00076065154,0.011716481,0.98057073,0.00016091026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.506631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66516244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98120606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012313605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002578835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053753315","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000170","title":"CONTRACTUAL PERFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE JUSTICE, AND DISGORGEMENT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Economic Justice; Damages; Prima facie; Law and economics; Business; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Exclusion clause; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.012048273427274997,"score_gpt":0.30707082934914604,"score_spread":0.29502255592187104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053753315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86255777,0.000045685476,0.0020973976,0.000547066,0.00048447624,0.00059836643,0.000058934016,0.0000337405,0.13357654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971616,0.000033932592,0.00029797028,0.00014507005,0.0002706732,0.000060418635,0.000004247704,0.0000064464975,0.0020196121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994198,0.00003685161,0.00013175694,0.00012430665,0.00011262102,0.00017465538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991158,0.0005296862,0.00008012162,0.000104490086,0.000097695076,0.00007215936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007805399,0.00006252429,0.00011188842,0.000022405453,0.0003355839,0.000036810827,0.00012180215,0.000060841994,0.00009531704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021928136,0.00005383236,0.00003754423,0.00005851574,0.00032853975,0.00017830511,0.000022500717,0.00014255958,0.000005101253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069454865,0.000060680246,0.00042001146,0.000016249878,0.000013247334,1.21552e-7,0.002529377,0.0000013347069,0.001801223,0.96244895,0.00017334076,0.032466006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013171566,0.00017774099,0.036292344,0.000023984978,0.00024302672,0.000002719749,0.006763862,0.0006783649,0.0037799438,0.025385946,0.9250269,0.0003080043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000327204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043184264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93706304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012677376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084615844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2581074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053920447","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqt015","title":"Insurance between Neighbours: Stannard v Gore and Common Law Liability for Fire","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Liability insurance; Law; Appeal; Statute; Strict liability; Insurance law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Insurance policy; Business; Political science; General insurance","score_opus":0.01727628533201254,"score_gpt":0.28269560693017864,"score_spread":0.2654193215981661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053920447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98657346,0.00019060507,0.00003537989,0.004700808,0.000043636996,0.00029239376,0.00012011749,0.0000055189284,0.008038075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986204,0.00008814003,0.0005659013,0.0002609479,0.00025785278,0.000010473982,0.0000027182805,0.0000068018735,0.00018674607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926215,0.000048705268,0.00024338852,0.000091396345,0.00019829498,0.00015604268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994398,0.00013149987,0.00017250213,0.000094561816,0.000010337716,0.00015130808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030568853,0.00006754712,0.00015369385,0.0000063664565,0.00039680954,0.00007254411,0.00015817421,0.00005716575,0.00012920506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007944344,0.000056995807,0.00007358195,0.000024849163,0.00048981234,0.00042310066,0.000037881644,0.000122036625,0.00001181653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031070816,0.0003837541,0.35964525,0.00003129451,0.00007732273,0.0000022723516,0.0029881883,0.000017476526,0.0016371754,0.6021977,0.00105366,0.03193483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049346813,0.00020044485,0.370335,0.000021181608,0.000027163136,0.0000026943517,0.0010622975,0.000011532262,0.00031251187,0.04214183,0.58524704,0.00014484746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097201474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003077496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58419335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000977585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011975726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30519783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055039348","doi":"10.1002/iir.123","title":"Ethics and conflicts, the role of insolvency professionals in the integrity of the Canadian bankruptcy and insolvency system","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Restructuring; Business; Statutory law; Legislature; Accountability; Accounting; Debt; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.061245592664692594,"score_gpt":0.3857068078766909,"score_spread":0.32446121521199833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055039348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29802093,0.20571615,0.00005406989,0.3253168,0.0009716654,0.0054948023,0.00035376012,0.000041102427,0.16403073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982725,0.015235313,0.00006391769,0.0017328355,0.00006720533,0.00010416696,0.0000046269965,0.0000057442526,0.00006114799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799544,0.00051314954,0.00052770757,0.00018184626,0.0006078116,0.00017406592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859506,0.00041113957,0.00031059774,0.00029496083,0.00031990337,0.00006833279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031737452,0.00011205301,0.00021885382,0.000053267482,0.0005789773,0.000044626348,0.00094629324,0.0001258193,0.000027143156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009623751,0.000058849462,0.0000877162,0.00039778728,0.00052282383,0.00014891062,0.00012033537,0.0007658916,0.0000032782023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016757925,0.0000648344,0.0052345297,0.0003052673,0.000016810967,6.380362e-7,0.017465588,0.0000019268325,0.000021565686,0.9745452,0.000053212218,0.002288796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039095266,0.000039933082,0.07262598,0.010163562,0.0000811575,0.000021130943,0.0134247625,0.000035990623,0.0001038282,0.041881036,0.8609867,0.0002449438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20720866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2794989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9326641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017080465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008615019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7980706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056925861","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2014.43.1.0262","title":"Necessity: Duress of Circumstances or Moral Involuntariness?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Element (criminal law); Law; Supreme court; Welsh; Courage; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.064879815500039,"score_gpt":0.3696249763636343,"score_spread":0.30474516086359527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056925861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004532829,0.05762386,0.00011191926,0.02071019,0.00026882856,0.000841012,0.000013588034,0.00012474961,0.91577303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96855485,0.02177364,0.00022824589,0.0031960835,0.00019610352,0.00005828003,0.000007945898,0.000009897391,0.005974929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889916,0.00020839847,0.0003152159,0.00015791185,0.0002373057,0.00018197959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991298,0.00015476828,0.00019063741,0.00035517244,0.000076695345,0.00009293991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000692811,0.00008902121,0.0003569871,0.000020010752,0.00033287043,0.000041132993,0.0004887808,0.000026918127,0.00068352657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005718818,0.00006593234,0.00008489983,0.00054753106,0.0003241853,0.00016990905,0.000087959,0.000108284614,0.000042370455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000219511,0.000036253725,0.0038623388,0.0007670333,0.0000056298013,4.2719552e-7,0.000097422286,7.136662e-7,0.0000037909717,0.9761147,0.005170015,0.013939511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067133114,0.000007116297,0.0011599022,0.001316436,0.000032429365,2.7464705e-7,0.000023066239,0.000006215065,0.000022988688,0.0072878664,0.9899788,0.000097810764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058505903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18509626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98480874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027098975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006175412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88443816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057396850","doi":"","title":"Calling Antony Duff to Account Rowan Cruft, Mathew H. Kramer, Mark R. Reiff (eds): Crime, Punishment and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff , Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rowan; Punishment (psychology); Jurisprudence; Criminology; Theology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.023110083916869216,"score_gpt":0.29382935112183695,"score_spread":0.27071926720496775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057396850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9251469,0.009769778,0.005951616,0.023222199,0.0002763897,0.0013251046,0.00005765702,0.000091103546,0.034159303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742826,0.018356437,0.00044816063,0.0001603063,0.00021924199,0.0000052885894,0.0000020336743,0.000017295919,0.0065086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678063,0.0003882097,0.00036624333,0.00033329285,0.00068223645,0.0014493903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984364,0.00019858021,0.00028845822,0.000409109,0.00031860647,0.0003488788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005377585,0.00018433065,0.00025746407,0.000082481645,0.0009610884,0.0001741066,0.000865709,0.00011568516,0.000025522824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024476444,0.00014616673,0.00010523294,0.00040029956,0.00034735727,0.00057265704,0.00024762255,0.0010617945,0.0000041013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042742738,0.00020106511,0.0021258881,0.000014002659,0.00012032877,0.000006764105,0.0047380235,0.00010880093,0.0003957504,0.9775716,0.0021195966,0.012170769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050452317,0.00024841027,0.0026705298,0.000040818468,0.00009299466,0.00003748212,0.013023953,0.00010113764,0.0001600104,0.046638265,0.9362297,0.00025218856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036519263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059190695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9341101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010006396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035545677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7392012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057708753","doi":"10.7202/045085ar","title":"Responsibility for Another’s Debt: Suretyship, Solidarity, and Imperfect Delegation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Debtor; Analogy; Obligation; Creditor; Law and economics; Debt; Law; Joint and several liability; Delegation; Political science; Imperfect; Interpretation (philosophy); Economics; Liability; Philosophy; Strict liability; Epistemology; Finance","score_opus":0.031050345143335326,"score_gpt":0.33483015941588545,"score_spread":0.30377981427255013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057708753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7885607,0.000048594327,0.001185331,0.010962812,0.0005715876,0.0006288603,0.0001031579,0.000075084434,0.1978639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972196,0.00002090933,0.0019582086,0.00023443555,0.00037752045,0.000013413783,0.000001416845,0.000008757956,0.00016574463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916387,0.00010917618,0.00017617371,0.00014458875,0.00017705433,0.00022912325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923706,0.00023448496,0.00008936207,0.0001247916,0.00017435297,0.00013996461],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018789426,0.00006703102,0.00009456355,0.00002285083,0.0051099015,0.00017882968,0.00015044847,0.00010145334,0.00009041591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032987,0.00005818901,0.00006591879,0.000079369165,0.00021652888,0.00026364988,0.000027681064,0.00029712537,0.000005626042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031995634,0.000031731077,0.0009551946,0.0000037678744,0.0000073328865,5.9254137e-7,0.00036536797,0.0000010325032,0.003944142,0.9883606,0.00015783015,0.006140458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003068857,0.00003850115,0.0026804227,0.000004238778,0.000014367764,0.000018445597,0.00017008826,0.00009467272,0.0015569883,0.05075479,0.9442559,0.000104696075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021602819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13514931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94409806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004443592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032822507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057982004","doi":"10.7202/203247ar","title":"Les définitions aristotéliciennes de la justice : leurs rapports à la notion d’égalité","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.36162639363872434,"score_gpt":0.4560137748673759,"score_spread":0.09438738122865153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057982004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12583765,0.0043711765,0.011028667,0.078372836,0.0005606457,0.00036425015,0.00009264938,0.00034322627,0.7790289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878336,0.0019150301,0.0022258672,0.0017802651,0.0037798295,0.00003901571,0.000023432829,0.00003308592,0.0023698339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773014,0.00062317326,0.00040684655,0.00035646308,0.0003208252,0.00056253816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787575,0.0011870272,0.00020229522,0.00026870923,0.00016829095,0.00029794293],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002956116,0.00022255398,0.00020430496,0.000108767206,0.0010603169,0.00015515325,0.0003096073,0.00040133254,0.00018201122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031889614,0.00024670467,0.00016525236,0.0004254217,0.0014813469,0.00034821828,0.000072804425,0.0004794144,0.00011396621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089962705,0.0003694514,0.00079373375,0.00006713315,0.000022515469,0.000033279368,0.008045981,0.000032146945,0.00029469165,0.9769325,0.002305713,0.011093855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013671767,0.0000371427,0.010087814,0.00008445512,0.00020007753,0.000025274941,0.0019338782,0.000062595325,0.0002843332,0.3568438,0.63001037,0.00029355957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065610157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008483733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.861996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030336482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022368293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058511668","doi":"10.1093/tandt/tts003","title":"Trusts in partibus infidelium","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04164470292564483,"score_gpt":0.37467503634307214,"score_spread":0.3330303334174273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058511668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7888406,0.0004950022,0.000036088197,0.0029905452,0.0003764438,0.00036360195,0.000008285427,0.00015544913,0.206734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950641,0.00010056131,0.00034826287,0.00036917496,0.0007055864,0.00008251391,0.000004958238,0.000016739208,0.0033081218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982785,0.00013740959,0.00030790293,0.000203361,0.00033444032,0.00073841255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920326,0.000118035714,0.0000817261,0.0002764927,0.000045567995,0.00027489624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078376016,0.0001368616,0.00018792365,0.00009416295,0.00032803955,0.000078393,0.00032054025,0.0001375013,0.0009564389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000148932,0.00013069066,0.00007044321,0.0003980385,0.00018422685,0.00054768595,0.000068441535,0.00020083184,0.00061017147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021068257,0.0003424171,0.33005103,0.000016734793,0.00001612483,0.0000035827943,0.030339004,0.000050670526,0.00022893655,0.6132164,0.0046564285,0.021057554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039741103,0.000014875186,0.1673279,0.000017331871,0.000016122252,0.0000016375867,0.004312548,0.00005484329,0.0002560238,0.0027277851,0.82458127,0.0002922423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041051153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048593683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8199249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014507602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120538156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058696629","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v1n4p81","title":"A Comparison of Two Legal Models of Social Governance in China: Public Law and Private Law----Appeal for Reforming Chinese Legal System","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Appeal; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Chinese law; Corporate governance; Administrative law; Political science; Municipal law; Business","score_opus":0.03860459826700246,"score_gpt":0.3474071610248997,"score_spread":0.30880256275789725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058696629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9543634,0.00022174363,0.00024838632,0.001520586,0.000058855272,0.00014083915,0.000057237678,0.000004501586,0.04338447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907625,0.00003520179,0.0004792844,0.00007695542,0.00025524653,0.000002784998,9.32633e-7,0.0000071997188,0.000066151704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988306,0.00004510806,0.0005405974,0.00008348011,0.00026783586,0.00023238835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991317,0.000051144027,0.0005078973,0.000060579772,0.00014127327,0.00010739955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045356277,0.00008251833,0.0003688468,0.000027661392,0.00043579814,0.000047499034,0.00014861471,0.000058901755,0.0000011427269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001872788,0.00006653461,0.000080908045,0.000094065435,0.00047981567,0.0005019927,0.00004483963,0.00015056161,5.6171956e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014085334,0.00007705816,0.0012336478,0.000068563946,0.000015181963,0.0000022467104,0.0036390505,0.00003466573,0.00008954773,0.9947803,0.000013855255,0.00003177123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015032747,0.0014058982,0.03872184,0.0009810122,0.00029250403,0.00046657244,0.017807335,0.033206224,0.0021225754,0.32705292,0.56147295,0.0014374175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015389385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071722614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6677274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089759604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013055342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99116725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059557261","doi":"10.7202/1026945ar","title":"La capacité de tester : tenants et aboutissants","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.021916160095592368,"score_gpt":0.28953770879785296,"score_spread":0.26762154870226057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059557261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53681755,0.0005032714,0.0030159536,0.019650172,0.00033293458,0.00026098307,0.000079683836,0.00009089077,0.4392486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590365,0.0005554538,0.0018932428,0.0013884009,0.0008483601,0.000043063228,0.00000726781,0.000031231262,0.03619647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998156,0.00035721052,0.0002616649,0.0003234385,0.00018200614,0.0007196906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987724,0.0003421099,0.0001319531,0.00035950745,0.000056549867,0.000337521],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013951996,0.00013230744,0.00023246746,0.000038450322,0.00032753483,0.00015096666,0.000425019,0.00030168003,0.00030068136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025044172,0.00018399327,0.00013355617,0.00033339794,0.00041493613,0.00023867654,0.00007443256,0.00039228602,0.00086620485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038220414,0.00016327586,0.018649656,0.000112517424,0.000023278228,0.00002073713,0.008967609,0.00007636886,0.0005228607,0.91757935,0.0027646185,0.051115915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003010868,0.000040492752,0.0647576,0.00028720978,0.00006419547,0.000081637525,0.0006149701,0.001871093,0.00016437547,0.13496394,0.79649043,0.00036297654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024962793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017248371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7937258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030225783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019995654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059942797","doi":"10.1002/iir.190","title":"The composition of the debtor's estate on insolvency: A comparative study of exemptions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Estate; Insolvency; Legislature; Composition (language); Business; Law; Probate; Creditor; Real estate; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Finance; Economics; Debt","score_opus":0.1616857352097863,"score_gpt":0.40704689393370325,"score_spread":0.24536115872391695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059942797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64205885,0.0050679687,0.00019437977,0.007981514,0.0012065035,0.0039860224,0.00011209413,0.00005194106,0.33934072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894876,0.009828024,0.00015205682,0.00015386834,0.000034412238,0.00013177113,0.0000032504574,0.0000039507822,0.00020508788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986998,0.00022289112,0.00042857538,0.00012373966,0.00042766376,0.000097366945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888253,0.00014547534,0.00037429263,0.00027161918,0.00029555656,0.000030508498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044210543,0.00007559141,0.0001596859,0.000024579851,0.0003923625,0.000014440133,0.000723825,0.000020791347,0.000110074674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006628894,0.000044638484,0.00011538334,0.0002610694,0.0002337186,0.00012348719,0.00007524139,0.000115719,0.000022339025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039148174,0.0026970333,0.0035120423,0.0000966708,0.00020119648,7.497923e-7,0.04371556,0.000033910233,0.00022371822,0.9353855,0.0024939328,0.0116005335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005984532,0.00035465832,0.056240935,0.002419005,0.00018361425,0.0000017252178,0.00797838,0.00011837614,0.00038814096,0.008089783,0.92336345,0.00026351053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014601116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017149721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92729574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055891924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008631776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30177748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060105243","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0014","title":"Private Law and Public Right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; University of Toronto; Canada Council for the Arts","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Slavic languages; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Classics; Law; History; Art history","score_opus":0.02653600188505005,"score_gpt":0.2331907195830554,"score_spread":0.20665471769800536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060105243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033522338,0.00014742279,0.0003215694,0.0006768405,0.000047410424,0.00004330657,0.0000034356005,0.000013179792,0.9652245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678475,0.0002739386,0.0021003631,0.00006960508,0.000050699677,1.8452797e-8,2.522757e-7,0.0000016742058,0.0007186963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960685,0.000044061853,0.00005234429,0.00005968977,0.00011485211,0.00012220259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996298,0.000011127661,0.000071598515,0.00006342345,0.000069188325,0.00015488609],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018042397,0.0000324486,0.00005937299,0.0000055181936,0.0011431024,0.00003038293,0.00021075369,0.00003598967,0.002199542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004446704,0.000033052595,0.00003477165,0.000015916317,0.00039006872,0.00060891575,0.00005079899,0.00006208979,0.000006386233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004451812,0.000027362265,0.00047746248,9.704557e-7,0.0000110229175,0.000004010748,0.005632473,3.7105576e-8,0.00002048216,0.9931627,0.00019447177,0.0004645623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017228705,0.00001916863,0.002190022,0.0000045345064,0.000012035116,0.000003844001,0.0055038063,0.0000023075086,0.00002338053,0.0073636537,0.98465395,0.000051032224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20731443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46940053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033112436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060291855","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0013","title":"Ernie's Three Worlds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035658198521737815,"score_gpt":0.24481946985963499,"score_spread":0.20916127133789716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060291855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01863964,0.00013995914,0.0015058166,0.00039645442,0.00008683474,0.000043255623,0.0000031717314,0.00001589008,0.97916895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400306,0.00016019875,0.002984895,0.000028046099,0.00009602806,1.8462936e-8,2.1710703e-7,0.0000020645007,0.0027254515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959326,0.000030995772,0.00005545966,0.000054685814,0.00014696996,0.000118656244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996297,0.000011409661,0.00007966481,0.00007722962,0.00008412681,0.00011786572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020050012,0.000032502285,0.000060693677,0.0000063438624,0.00086849293,0.0000136533745,0.00031187435,0.00003493187,0.0054911915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004898101,0.000035206285,0.00006538049,0.000020526024,0.00021170905,0.00036434754,0.000038615017,0.00007275022,0.000024761352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016355816,0.000050557926,0.0023674236,0.0000010269875,0.000019166218,0.000007772847,0.015298426,8.134782e-7,0.000021205151,0.97650725,0.0012571557,0.004452842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020289094,0.000026511927,0.015406624,0.000008303137,0.000021283666,0.0000025256381,0.011140871,0.000005756798,0.00001632476,0.005542297,0.96755755,0.00006907517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2977756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7502186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014038943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059346905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99541795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061219859","doi":"10.14722/ndss.2015.23258","title":"Gracewipe: Secure and Verifiable Deletion under Coercion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Verifiable secret sharing; Coercion (linguistics); Computer science; Computer security; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07722505167905437,"score_gpt":0.35174377412163055,"score_spread":0.2745187224425762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061219859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4318948,0.00021187935,0.0072446913,0.023519835,0.00014197339,0.0002730816,0.0000037712339,0.00015791535,0.536552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889036,0.000046076442,0.0006515864,0.00030878079,0.00008376504,0.000007832616,0.0000031575257,0.0000025626196,0.009992676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963266,0.000024798332,0.000045598463,0.00008176494,0.00011913,0.000096026844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997557,0.000013742908,0.000014156989,0.0000586029,0.000051001116,0.00010680085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002313815,0.000028577186,0.00003426419,0.000010208072,0.00019439991,0.000057754973,0.00004737341,0.000039647683,0.00008868333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021702303,0.000024771402,0.00000833741,0.00009264293,0.000062191146,0.00013404267,0.000018736771,0.000037868132,0.00007278015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019450454,0.000013730295,0.00072809495,0.0000010310227,0.0000016230896,1.2712624e-7,0.0018740204,0.000021579219,0.00007006031,0.9853459,0.010873794,0.0010680848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014408442,0.000011939587,0.0012763393,0.0000018854746,0.0000043735995,4.400296e-7,0.0070742355,0.00026385215,0.00006642598,0.031188129,0.9599017,0.000066588414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054999623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029633779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95415777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003637018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006904963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8314334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061805555","doi":"10.7202/045699ar","title":"From Norms to Facts: The Realization of Rights in Common and Civil Private Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal culture; Private law; Legal realism; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Empirical legal studies; Legal profession; Normative; Philosophy of law; Legal history; Ideal (ethics); Comparative law; Public law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04192305796101551,"score_gpt":0.29518315741207485,"score_spread":0.2532600994510593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061805555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4259848,0.000023065537,0.00024115558,0.0010745836,0.00008667537,0.00019147078,0.000043534095,0.000011855449,0.5723429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949116,0.00002373694,0.00018712145,0.00020096173,0.000065917535,0.000003127182,0.0000012911895,0.0000027318742,0.000023952593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999414,0.00007668336,0.00018152654,0.00006924231,0.00014611613,0.00011241644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996584,0.000040190007,0.00009209397,0.00009275705,0.000038621096,0.00007792967],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033695615,0.000042102885,0.00008083261,0.000015423047,0.0013424084,0.000031943848,0.0001778543,0.000034306293,0.000081934995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000964013,0.000026380985,0.000018972754,0.000107822,0.00012285053,0.00015544302,0.0000386463,0.00010158737,0.000006028268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057467973,0.00002339583,0.00087456155,6.3080864e-7,0.000003930319,9.93812e-7,0.004020114,0.0000045554693,0.000047698017,0.99469936,0.0000300296,0.00028897793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014878012,0.000022260061,0.010147965,0.000025690077,0.0000071709187,0.0000014474111,0.00049447175,0.000007978015,0.0009372112,0.25091913,0.7372272,0.00006071437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19725037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6281805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74378026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030716074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038093167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062435447","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01784.x","title":"ANALYSING CONTRACTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: LESSONS FROM INDIGENOUS HEALTH IN CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Positive Living North; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Business; Perspective (graphical); Conceptual framework; Strengths and weaknesses; Public relations; Public economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06613390136467633,"score_gpt":0.35489292659155425,"score_spread":0.2887590252268779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062435447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85754156,0.000037635513,0.0004970621,0.14096113,0.000029189474,0.00022235673,0.00004853753,0.0000097895645,0.00065274426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810904,0.000049458064,0.0001751476,0.00065803,0.00011129696,0.0000038362264,0.0001049054,0.0000022122053,0.00078607746],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991313,0.000061107574,0.00020281914,0.00017314771,0.00018120118,0.0002504191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949706,0.00004002615,0.0001070547,0.00008972296,0.000007245219,0.00025887034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001998649,0.000064170206,0.00010837554,0.00003240861,0.0002668875,0.00014424643,0.00008829276,0.000041487237,0.000110761284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003712209,0.00006902832,0.000011764767,0.00013910104,0.000031463824,0.00024416848,0.0000058206874,0.00009672893,0.0000038568146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050079627,0.0006516639,0.2789907,0.0000050667113,0.0000758839,0.000023884435,0.037255846,0.000057096393,0.00061587605,0.23987332,0.014068278,0.42833233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002427057,0.00004014284,0.743007,0.000003759939,0.0000060772936,6.613371e-7,0.0014233061,0.00003780458,0.000021240312,0.0023315116,0.2527754,0.00011038765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94898665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99411976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46401632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004824576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026332326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46712416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062851214","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00638.x","title":"The Political Origins of English Private Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Legitimacy; Politics; Public law; Law; Political science; Rationality; Political law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Sociology; Law and economics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.017862832459416722,"score_gpt":0.3017493670954498,"score_spread":0.2838865346360331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062851214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6507312,0.00022041898,0.000102664875,0.016158469,0.0003315322,0.00016519462,0.0000058246846,0.000011864958,0.33227283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977134,0.0001982777,0.00043271633,0.0009783041,0.00053392147,0.0000013587392,8.418218e-8,0.0000022749837,0.00013965038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994118,0.000036059915,0.00017882617,0.000035548037,0.00018623265,0.0001514998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923986,0.00016178837,0.000105383464,0.00005839516,0.00031966018,0.00011491844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003920611,0.000032519096,0.00008222363,0.0000020044104,0.00050425663,0.00008732785,0.0001386683,0.000043556403,0.00002048108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005376967,0.00001936866,0.00011109385,0.0000400867,0.0005751566,0.0001676072,0.000023859457,0.00013028206,0.0000016765279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.720114e-7,0.000015468428,0.00019732537,0.0000022950328,0.0000140192515,6.646526e-8,0.0043689553,2.2627599e-7,0.00006697908,0.99438393,0.00087446807,0.00007568029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010572404,0.000018944245,0.00062758056,0.000005913255,0.000010199357,5.137824e-7,0.005745136,0.000006389713,0.00014064829,0.052144624,0.9411654,0.00002892137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026724134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016902838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94223934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048163907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006317614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40399072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064701930","doi":"10.7202/050456ar","title":"The Exclusive Remedy Provision in Canadian Worker Compensation Law: The Need for Legislative Reform","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Statutory law; Legislature; Compensation (psychology); Workers' compensation; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Constitution; Psychology","score_opus":0.034895431753824674,"score_gpt":0.312679048326955,"score_spread":0.27778361657313033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064701930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029480502,0.00025148445,0.00048304064,0.33136386,0.00014584349,0.0024293235,0.000032362055,0.000046024506,0.6357676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872706,0.000046286877,0.0002348949,0.00029261567,0.00029203028,0.00018393643,0.000021030795,0.000007651472,0.011650969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906194,0.000100527766,0.00022378753,0.00013353913,0.0001684782,0.00031170162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998975,0.0005346985,0.00009598103,0.00020225655,0.00009828648,0.00009379619],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007697297,0.0000716369,0.00006347497,0.000053624626,0.003403448,0.00013314238,0.00025409448,0.0001581652,0.00003087834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023335655,0.000045186513,0.00003884288,0.0004690815,0.00026690302,0.00024118491,0.000026004032,0.00029155478,0.00003389838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051235215,0.00001122125,0.00067315216,1.0504408e-7,0.000005928577,7.830023e-8,0.009550067,0.00068838976,0.0000033266053,0.9675987,0.0023612713,0.019102642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015798611,0.000007323737,0.0021529458,0.00001166959,0.0000070412075,1.64456e-7,0.013796951,0.002304917,0.00001679508,0.0052920845,0.97618484,0.00006730488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28646794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8987177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97382355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065743615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007248154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064977114","doi":"10.7202/1009444ar","title":"La Loi sur le transfert des valeurs mobilières et l’obtention des titres intermédiés ou les excès d’un régime d’exception en matière de sûretés mobilières","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025420367069378086,"score_gpt":0.285478167782644,"score_spread":0.2600578007132659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064977114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9306914,0.004028141,0.036680073,0.0022139605,0.00022688835,0.00052558177,0.00013812452,0.00019748304,0.025298309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649929,0.0027853472,0.0031353165,0.00016730078,0.0005404009,0.00019709073,0.00006352961,0.0000747818,0.028043326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963784,0.0011576137,0.00050941494,0.00046766395,0.0004033924,0.0010835122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828506,0.00065204327,0.00014784253,0.00037046275,0.00012610019,0.00041852455],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019833478,0.00039286906,0.00037354964,0.00014011485,0.001198159,0.00027835224,0.0005993576,0.0007926033,0.00079757825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021902968,0.00043136292,0.00034762447,0.00046968102,0.0029479794,0.0013236945,0.00008077564,0.0008179841,0.00015198583],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056087556,0.00117553,0.03214726,0.0005037614,0.00022215935,0.000011125937,0.16969661,0.0005507528,0.008800637,0.29646876,0.0008924472,0.48947483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018092745,0.00037124858,0.39893663,0.00093065266,0.0007564822,0.00015583144,0.08529891,0.0017076362,0.010610592,0.1826333,0.31484866,0.0019408108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032601677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01832075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48753405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015786516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025075706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066384412","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0149.2008.456_21.x","title":"<i>Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?</i> ‐ By Christopher Heath Wellman and A. John Simmons","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Books","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Citation; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.047088532565750955,"score_gpt":0.2997351343931501,"score_spread":0.2526466018273991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066384412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105205,0.0006711049,0.000053478583,0.30744237,0.000049269423,0.00047495431,0.000051997376,0.00009713627,0.58595467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799404,0.00021222807,0.00006639583,0.015421283,0.0004516286,0.00006367437,0.0000021159333,0.000014102473,0.0038281379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988589,0.00007599523,0.00016213552,0.0002910078,0.00031665893,0.00029526697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992327,0.00010675724,0.000035775076,0.00029950336,0.000041934127,0.00028333112],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020415062,0.00012377363,0.00013979044,0.00001144794,0.001553251,0.00006570618,0.0003263571,0.00009674515,0.00016440447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003087927,0.000087341745,0.00006893341,0.000120887824,0.00066776824,0.00007007036,0.000112868955,0.00024409794,0.00013734752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009336228,0.000060076964,0.00035041943,0.0000022565398,0.00001103305,0.0000040749187,0.0044555706,7.4347366e-7,0.00022372596,0.9715751,0.023114406,0.0001932827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001293477,0.000031651107,0.000532059,0.000006076625,0.000010375344,0.0000028431366,0.0001415023,0.00000989442,0.00014387262,0.1012889,0.89756304,0.00014042247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030190935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006154533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8747354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037104237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058426376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066571852","doi":"10.1002/(sici)1099-1107(200021)9:1<5::aid-iir60>3.0.co;2-p","title":"Transactional avoidance: critical aspects of English and Australian law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Transactional leadership; Law; Law library; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.03481918342887257,"score_gpt":0.37597466136485985,"score_spread":0.3411554779359873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066571852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029248449,0.009945779,0.000055940975,0.019542003,0.00038319008,0.0002609897,0.00010040842,0.00004333754,0.9667435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95619947,0.03969349,0.00032996046,0.0010689263,0.00042364103,0.000034959958,0.000010982097,0.000005336199,0.002233232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915814,0.000049366623,0.00024089277,0.00014280058,0.00029702124,0.000111776324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994387,0.00009556888,0.000037974034,0.0000825876,0.0002678007,0.000077341516],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026186733,0.000060590002,0.0001243113,0.000014815106,0.00013621373,0.000028708717,0.00019552658,0.00003866327,0.0066844337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019218255,0.00005899296,0.000069421,0.00009951676,0.00029186177,0.00023741872,0.0000073316,0.00010393512,0.00006049576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022466745,0.00006221359,0.000052132353,0.00011039286,0.000011262289,8.143987e-7,0.00048120724,0.0000011588647,0.0000141547125,0.9868339,0.0011198116,0.011310718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000621664,0.000009501655,0.00045345485,0.00045515812,0.000015949909,0.0000012647412,0.00004217466,0.0000037925886,0.000030245015,0.008898595,0.98996323,0.00006444184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005965426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002763058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98884344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003337424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006090941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066855800","doi":"10.1002/iir.122","title":"Forgiving our debtors: a Scottish perspective on a fresh start for debtors","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Bankruptcy; Debt; Fresh Start; Perspective (graphical); Balance (ability); Business; Enforcement; Law and economics; Insolvency; Law; Receivership; Creditor; Economics; Political science; Finance; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.059815576180962574,"score_gpt":0.4162219718174838,"score_spread":0.35640639563652127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066855800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021516306,0.05539522,0.016961398,0.4203588,0.0041337227,0.008179887,0.0006188635,0.000588003,0.47224778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962686,0.022784244,0.0041026566,0.0059968424,0.0013673072,0.0007790569,0.000033628727,0.00003202767,0.002218211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987696,0.00003820376,0.0002788083,0.00028910727,0.00039383254,0.00023048412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991168,0.000076916775,0.00014121087,0.00016546095,0.0003978288,0.00010179951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045495605,0.00011685527,0.00017633398,0.000056516827,0.0003360781,0.00008615762,0.00047782797,0.00005087285,0.00013267765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007953145,0.00010981242,0.00020688042,0.00019630948,0.000046130295,0.00026209248,0.000042283646,0.00012233431,0.00013278538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065351255,0.00015519618,0.00015758905,0.000077087214,0.00004458356,0.0000017140395,0.0013127079,0.000027119764,0.000019941885,0.98634666,0.0089021595,0.0029486765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030949104,0.00006371608,0.0002752422,0.0019809527,0.000029707331,0.0000016479574,0.001510267,0.000013244692,0.00004112881,0.04140834,0.9541812,0.00018505291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00246941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027952238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94527906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007532272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029065326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44780204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068515088","doi":"","title":"A Commonwealth of Perspective on Restitutionary Disgorgement for Breach of Contract","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Law; Breach of contract; Scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Damages","score_opus":0.031092571421402693,"score_gpt":0.35275207865930025,"score_spread":0.32165950723789755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068515088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90747344,0.0022904475,0.015011508,0.020801922,0.00016029665,0.0010896872,0.00006761031,0.00003034485,0.053074766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971697,0.0020015044,0.00011326089,0.00004404808,0.0001489288,0.000011226035,0.000001748561,0.0000043670907,0.00050522207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988401,0.000058683625,0.00019605494,0.00008374259,0.00023286282,0.00058855757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934894,0.00011507677,0.00019436386,0.00008197198,0.00020920242,0.000050425602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009985004,0.00005012696,0.00012189836,0.000042946318,0.0005033769,0.000004443111,0.00017470458,0.00003258487,0.000011310147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010019048,0.000043457174,0.00009419199,0.00011111289,0.00020264681,0.000069111884,0.000009758296,0.00035026364,0.0000016650599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000595696,0.00017715545,0.0008901648,0.0000020573366,0.000038702015,2.755863e-7,0.0020381534,0.00003446948,0.00009362846,0.99567336,0.00012419767,0.00086827454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021257675,0.0016130325,0.020859769,0.000054916847,0.00006777709,0.00007917411,0.035875157,0.00009768382,0.0004263746,0.8903912,0.048165202,0.00024399324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030624522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032332856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1052822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009357062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032590516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57814175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071745665","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0045","title":"Person, place, or thing?: Property and the structuring of social relations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Trespass; Property (philosophy); Expropriation; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Relation (database); Epistemology; Property rights; Intuition; Structuring; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01396040738108468,"score_gpt":0.2380048575908833,"score_spread":0.22404445020979863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071745665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44463512,0.000068456364,0.0001830567,0.008439128,0.00013746157,0.00019063239,0.0000135368555,0.000014243572,0.54631835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943316,0.000036855923,0.000988478,0.000013981687,0.00009896553,3.5704915e-8,1.8862548e-7,0.0000015703804,0.0045283204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996231,0.000059017548,0.00005980293,0.000046186324,0.00013861194,0.00007327312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996419,0.000057091376,0.000120195466,0.000045999153,0.000090696245,0.00004410491],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003577417,0.000029855846,0.00007275044,0.0000053574904,0.0019228865,0.000024739595,0.00018566998,0.00004396525,0.0009377296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003262863,0.000017878498,0.00004491987,0.000019246885,0.00068059785,0.00028535383,0.00003319486,0.0001591467,6.662944e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009458177,0.000015155305,0.00037083856,0.0000034031184,0.00002605232,8.7479214e-7,0.0954606,0.0000035737849,0.0001864425,0.9016161,0.00082962215,0.001392758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00174806,0.00003160014,0.012727269,0.000013480618,0.00008524245,0.000012456205,0.14843765,0.00017770346,0.00002640306,0.0017675064,0.834864,0.000108625034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07388999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3291917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044321634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009553435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W207198083","doi":"","title":"Shareholder Primacy Revisited: Does the Public Interest Have Any Role in Statutory Duties?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Shareholder; Corporate law; Enforcement; Business; Public interest; Shareholder primacy; CONTEST; Mandate; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03567579830684491,"score_gpt":0.257657173879542,"score_spread":0.2219813755726971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W207198083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91369957,0.00040571272,0.00014840112,0.049719553,0.000057657046,0.00039103214,0.000055577744,0.00021105805,0.03531145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964695,0.00039343102,0.0003282675,0.000086751046,0.000020308195,0.0000022982445,0.0000057172424,0.0000057464817,0.0026879641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909264,0.00007324419,0.000117373034,0.00025904775,0.00016022197,0.00029747523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991978,0.000061053026,0.00012913813,0.00044241492,0.00010626834,0.00006336164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002122541,0.000091843525,0.0001754397,0.0003003242,0.0007364705,0.000019191042,0.0010839218,0.000208522,0.00036473488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011074579,0.00007728355,0.00006646995,0.00048610993,0.00158243,0.00034551797,0.00042222464,0.00027775852,0.000036982918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017919605,0.00023034793,0.17872907,0.000020443966,0.00005529199,0.00005526595,0.012901997,0.0000028970412,0.00049644854,0.7916796,0.004876612,0.010934067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036282302,0.000021073145,0.039422803,0.000035754667,0.00001602212,0.0000050520534,0.03414211,0.00004769714,0.00023681522,0.008790784,0.916741,0.00017806017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026729817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00978059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9118644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105792824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014065736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58305293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072071869","doi":"10.7202/1000620ar","title":"The Public/Private Distinction in Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Dominion; Discretion; Liberalism; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.07299705351343487,"score_gpt":0.2972038172188597,"score_spread":0.2242067637054248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072071869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030136079,0.000095666335,0.00032804965,0.0075008846,0.00047953718,0.00012930328,0.0000079832525,0.00003845118,0.96128404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893093,0.00028296033,0.00021186953,0.00008552078,0.0001844585,0.000010905334,5.3082334e-7,0.00000601339,0.00028678123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990883,0.00012696364,0.00019722435,0.00009107344,0.00022014552,0.0002762898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995183,0.000058928337,0.00010422193,0.00012162521,0.00007130935,0.00012562417],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009497328,0.000053756365,0.000060253078,0.000021805701,0.0067678248,0.00014797981,0.00032209276,0.00004545399,0.0002280771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008174809,0.000036461366,0.00005303539,0.0001953667,0.00019240235,0.00026917254,0.000043774933,0.0002432366,0.000063179534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036265797,0.00002841137,0.0017246519,4.0302913e-7,0.0000042990578,0.000003107683,0.00041708112,0.0000010062478,0.0000053196495,0.9844626,0.00009238394,0.013257087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009327605,0.000008463289,0.006273909,0.0000044608605,0.0000034562127,0.0000056422437,0.0009782094,0.000015484195,0.00004208152,0.011874842,0.9806435,0.000056639816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005079569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11810461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012812072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015041043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99452525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072149012","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttq108","title":"First Guernsey case on trusts and mistake: Arun Estate Agencies Limited v Kleinwort Benson (Guernsey) Trustees Limited, Royal Court of Guernsey, 7 April 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Mistake; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02947886790701451,"score_gpt":0.2842056404824199,"score_spread":0.25472677257540544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072149012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.944162,0.0002287535,0.00003110288,0.0031881882,0.00096542103,0.0011313803,0.00036086148,0.00035350744,0.049578775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98601526,0.0011855091,0.001377071,0.00024379787,0.0007713098,0.0001347594,0.000054749464,0.00010868481,0.01010883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512863,0.00025243746,0.0011058175,0.0011295618,0.0011593685,0.0012241566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959569,0.00093024276,0.00066631543,0.0012176626,0.00045292045,0.0007759788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001219909,0.00073132024,0.0008849609,0.00049861404,0.0019364433,0.00039805652,0.00091788586,0.0006632354,0.0011743718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073070655,0.000689836,0.00033229517,0.00075981324,0.0015176095,0.00044041584,0.00023622187,0.0010689837,0.00013942775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037895662,0.006948944,0.16882019,0.0019733543,0.001988919,0.005869558,0.22859511,0.0039078374,0.011918589,0.26138788,0.10684983,0.19795023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038582052,0.0007747671,0.092571,0.00030746803,0.00060654816,0.00043340636,0.022790423,0.0041113463,0.00368242,0.0015305729,0.8668377,0.002496139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019254478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07275551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7599879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000149073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031948948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072498805","doi":"10.1017/s000819731300038x","title":"CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND THE NO-PROFIT RULE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Business; Law and economics; Profit (economics); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.010481985199346025,"score_gpt":0.2585663839237788,"score_spread":0.24808439872443278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072498805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34182706,0.00026337715,0.00007866911,0.049207143,0.00033163684,0.00040332202,0.000006366802,0.000021120599,0.6078613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951659,0.00015894839,0.00011050567,0.0011098606,0.0008805493,0.000023125525,2.504643e-7,0.000005030549,0.0025458517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999182,0.00021048216,0.00013190601,0.000073509786,0.00020044048,0.0002016994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993267,0.00020457082,0.000096968535,0.00012867176,0.00014244425,0.00010064134],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008123582,0.00005970086,0.000088600165,0.0000073665756,0.0025130843,0.00037863274,0.00030452825,0.00003122583,0.00018407468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057848167,0.0000286048,0.0000526347,0.000074950716,0.0015400323,0.00020532978,0.00005842655,0.00028286313,0.00027432278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007846692,0.000002756997,0.00022864413,6.3771984e-7,0.000014366403,4.9539887e-7,0.0012602115,6.7955335e-7,0.00003125573,0.991281,0.0051208124,0.0020513302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018721581,0.000026127245,0.019900938,0.000023074019,0.00007530794,0.0002239373,0.014630277,0.00028827655,0.00012223226,0.092372075,0.87021595,0.00024966657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006937664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033572246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8989089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031402797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055198554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075420913","doi":"10.7202/042347ar","title":"La responsabilité civile découlant de l'inaction gouvernementale","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Statutory law; Duty; Political science; Law; Liability; Action (physics); Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.009444771025772564,"score_gpt":0.28549468103139,"score_spread":0.2760499100056174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075420913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8389944,0.000038254286,0.002943106,0.0019529915,0.000028311557,0.00013565963,0.000011159586,0.00009296571,0.15580317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807158,0.000068151945,0.0015385177,0.0004234969,0.00022590756,0.0000417042,0.0000045885436,0.00000926617,0.016972544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999176,0.0001362283,0.00010696905,0.00014731617,0.00016158355,0.00027187125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951196,0.00015840202,0.00004228128,0.00014754791,0.000018984607,0.00012083492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075105776,0.000060168866,0.000067833855,0.000030777916,0.0005018458,0.000057118254,0.00017579742,0.00015120658,0.00030810488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111493515,0.000067516936,0.000057936617,0.00014000239,0.00031022212,0.000114877206,0.000017184811,0.00021834165,0.00009749622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003953004,0.00018725786,0.0058185044,0.000011908864,0.000021942105,0.000009388282,0.022236938,0.0001055665,0.004532753,0.90220284,0.006260104,0.058573235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016014991,0.0000132817395,0.012714666,0.0000066583566,0.000013326277,0.0000058118394,0.008894163,0.00029142943,0.0009894216,0.0053137094,0.97148037,0.00011702149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036048733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00487745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002777489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014201284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7263037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076162734","doi":"10.1017/s0940739109090018","title":"The Market Overt Method to Obtain Ownership of Lost or Stolen Goods: Comment on <i>Manning</i> v. <i>Algard Estate</i>, [2008] BCSC 1129","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Property","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Daughter; Advertising; Business; Estate tax; Commerce; Economics; Art; Law; Finance; Political science; Tax avoidance","score_opus":0.054509783791833376,"score_gpt":0.38661539119294924,"score_spread":0.3321056074011159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076162734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022808999,0.00019635142,0.003300989,0.7346191,0.0010982179,0.00093226274,0.00006372604,0.00004005349,0.2369403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566338,0.0005689934,0.006730962,0.015927259,0.00094727386,0.000009644932,0.000004300733,0.000013294602,0.019164482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977345,0.0003114077,0.0005397463,0.00014651036,0.0010330128,0.00023483393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998141,0.00029743285,0.00043687405,0.00013453866,0.0008156587,0.0001745317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015963884,0.00013401629,0.00020050551,0.000052428535,0.000303952,0.00021985047,0.0010529007,0.000053591117,0.00015233365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046774975,0.000054800996,0.00016483419,0.0001756853,0.00011144358,0.0003055628,0.00006419716,0.00027455445,0.000023526936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026140339,0.00064238044,0.00031586934,0.000008662489,0.00033183594,0.000050279847,0.015601516,0.0007895621,0.0046863193,0.043360468,0.6852251,0.24637394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041661455,0.00034887413,0.00064843515,0.00011403274,0.000018281882,0.000022022805,0.003379068,0.00008725268,0.0015239434,0.0007272123,0.99259603,0.00011825539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051993475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018709866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025455587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019231053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23377837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076627343","doi":"10.7202/042694ar","title":"Faute lourde and the Perfectly Drafted Exclusion Clause: A « civil» Response to a « Common » Problem with Special Reference to Contracts for the Provision of Security Services","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.008599180939803972,"score_gpt":0.26673581520087963,"score_spread":0.25813663426107564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076627343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89313537,0.0005890359,0.0015190055,0.09803023,0.0000481536,0.0030824756,0.0001229647,0.000026493091,0.0034462446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920526,0.00019759938,0.0015904726,0.0020760682,0.000489476,0.00027336783,0.0000050964754,0.000019730225,0.0032955713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807566,0.00041962694,0.00032209457,0.00035285743,0.00038077284,0.00044898692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975995,0.001429723,0.00020986478,0.0003570548,0.00017256058,0.00023132774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021348186,0.00019324267,0.00030131204,0.00005023257,0.0012165828,0.00017515176,0.0005413719,0.00022072648,0.000034777702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013209837,0.00012254436,0.00007287768,0.00049015216,0.000881912,0.00018521487,0.00014734009,0.0004063735,0.000012466467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01458648,0.00031105414,0.00031758877,0.00024543644,0.000109376284,0.00000435122,0.3866426,0.0009613336,0.002751421,0.5103297,0.0011188221,0.08262182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023243772,0.00065549527,0.006916058,0.00038632832,0.00020600215,0.000010753257,0.012618002,0.0033465219,0.0005055462,0.018838301,0.9538564,0.00033619668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004837063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07812184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95273757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000393133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019267193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077991194","doi":"10.1017/s1352325210000017","title":"THE FIDUCIARY CONSTITUTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Constitution; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.015071503721884585,"score_gpt":0.32928223572103665,"score_spread":0.31421073199915206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077991194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06167967,0.00013769009,0.00027397476,0.0025697034,0.00009109358,0.00014289044,0.0000031343639,0.00004226936,0.93505955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943141,0.000008931766,0.000031748656,0.00013206202,0.00017055252,0.0000039078177,0.0000013152824,9.918044e-7,0.005336437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944353,0.0001209996,0.00010879227,0.00007366392,0.00013052295,0.0001224841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961346,0.000113204216,0.000051343086,0.0001495981,0.00003826038,0.000034153105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006822254,0.000036931382,0.000050864688,0.000011801917,0.0014837671,0.00004010257,0.00020568022,0.000034640587,0.000055745368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035184592,0.000024479656,0.000041740605,0.000096661635,0.0004931334,0.00010425915,0.000011117272,0.00007475852,0.000026011854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039681972,0.000019792966,0.00000927316,3.8064582e-7,0.000002534059,3.6790578e-7,0.0005589881,0.0000012991139,0.00055047293,0.99527633,0.0005091538,0.0030674501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037991682,0.000011759209,0.0004840376,0.000004089833,0.0000036904667,1.7742902e-7,0.0001750446,0.0000011223144,0.00072685647,0.49409118,0.5044349,0.00002916187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008683537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070529163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93263435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022061418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050449973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079011279","doi":"10.1017/s000819731400004x","title":"EXPRESS TERMINATION CLAUSES IN CONTRACTS","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Reading (process); Law; Political science; Business; Computer science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.019473972081441346,"score_gpt":0.30527294866899923,"score_spread":0.2857989765875579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079011279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49612033,0.00008951289,0.0009208854,0.019790193,0.00028786762,0.00018975175,0.0000034042687,0.000030482039,0.48256755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780977,0.00005029185,0.000064407104,0.0007104392,0.00066241797,0.000007034351,5.4717395e-7,0.0000044462276,0.00069065334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991931,0.00021529802,0.00014598374,0.00006276874,0.00019899993,0.00018384935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951357,0.00016959467,0.00008827013,0.000104009974,0.000053449712,0.00007111367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012501129,0.00004428461,0.000067166104,0.000018404453,0.0008097814,0.00017528226,0.00027053573,0.0000346283,0.000022808186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009570287,0.000030477837,0.00003258545,0.000085698346,0.0001562355,0.00021595714,0.000020490741,0.00021322175,0.000035249188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004406505,0.000025487234,0.0003702843,8.9980915e-7,0.0000023750401,0.0000019564193,0.0012670594,0.000025264655,0.0005502529,0.9893418,0.0016571885,0.0067530232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024487442,0.000011019534,0.013589117,0.000017181064,0.0000061335686,0.000013009082,0.0007872327,0.00014057627,0.0002693222,0.00400638,0.9808462,0.00006889947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022270493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037119635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055320677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035799403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6228266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079953364","doi":"10.7202/042685ar","title":"La propriété fiduciaire","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Institution; Law and economics; Business; Trust law; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.011106111229003358,"score_gpt":0.27962917889266165,"score_spread":0.2685230676636583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079953364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51782066,0.00007850278,0.0018625518,0.0073293475,0.000028467639,0.0001512725,0.0000049255373,0.0001300388,0.4725942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96680313,0.000047341367,0.0017179701,0.0006314675,0.00034442538,0.000028139222,0.0000022496858,0.000007922302,0.03041737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936324,0.000058224705,0.00008332239,0.00012423664,0.00014625839,0.00022469222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964714,0.000063788255,0.000031173193,0.00013023462,0.000023516463,0.00010417204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003744228,0.000050381565,0.000061132174,0.000021942546,0.00045695336,0.000061879684,0.00020450028,0.00014929079,0.00016841665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008456208,0.000052281684,0.000048735983,0.00013883987,0.00031975357,0.00009672508,0.000014897918,0.00022211384,0.00017428178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002064392,0.000030923406,0.0004504835,0.0000031958627,0.000005609551,0.0000022596396,0.012417898,0.000021466974,0.00011878842,0.8468049,0.0019201712,0.13822222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008585088,0.000004812468,0.0019452401,0.0000044072667,0.000006654127,0.0000016712551,0.001913685,0.000056480418,0.00018788327,0.014467977,0.9812386,0.00008676332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006545491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00154021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000407566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113376795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3514562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080537559","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttu234","title":"Recent changes in Canada in the areas of trusts and estates law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Legislature; Immigration; Business; Tax planning; Law; Public economics; Law and economics; Public administration; Political science; Economics; Tax avoidance; Tax reform","score_opus":0.017789047269024878,"score_gpt":0.26799809648060213,"score_spread":0.2502090492115773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080537559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93275684,0.00027485972,0.0000010908195,0.012136934,0.00005257422,0.0002645759,0.0000094321695,0.0000092241135,0.054494444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985034,0.00068541785,0.000037185437,0.00056162017,0.000053663847,0.00003641469,0.0000026175035,0.0000052289597,0.00011445125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990229,0.00017967481,0.00017113678,0.00014965788,0.00024015288,0.000236472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994053,0.00028405988,0.00006692543,0.0001606548,0.000029067924,0.00005396141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005853332,0.000078711106,0.00014767487,0.000035629433,0.0001267929,0.000031224256,0.00024600743,0.00003853653,0.00007280184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000850577,0.000058371752,0.000012145721,0.00022969188,0.00016431257,0.00006528787,0.000031316435,0.00010412897,0.000001639534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022010949,0.00009686835,0.1404345,0.000039092956,0.000008310848,0.0000050474055,0.029328277,0.00007439555,0.0000385039,0.7096811,0.0006914184,0.11958047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047115274,0.00003306251,0.29117596,0.000045947887,0.000010839011,0.0000013390481,0.016442474,0.00019659346,0.00025968166,0.007602771,0.683572,0.0001881968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.918145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70207834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011701896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023666825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2380331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081204815","doi":"10.1080/14649350600841651","title":"Third Party Rights of Appeal: Enhancing Democracy or Hindering Progress?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; General partnership; Political science; Appeal; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Democracy; Commission; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.026488607572180006,"score_gpt":0.3570111835413545,"score_spread":0.3305225759691745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081204815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4274821,0.0013336886,0.012890413,0.007446561,0.00036933587,0.0008731491,0.000012858393,0.0005735198,0.5490184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918988,0.000011415423,0.0054114345,0.00013668062,0.0003671663,0.000026201873,0.000005021668,0.000012762555,0.0021305531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834025,0.00043783657,0.00031439692,0.00023183481,0.00034509398,0.00033060415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972294,0.00195664,0.00039133074,0.00022678499,0.000121358746,0.000074507276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025099337,0.00011108962,0.00015977121,0.0000469415,0.0009772078,0.00011264834,0.00028780077,0.00008248452,0.0000801137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000919097,0.00008948531,0.000049927927,0.00027693284,0.00022159326,0.0007643727,0.00006590778,0.00023392854,0.000050811217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002365246,0.00019554072,0.0020532077,0.000026957812,0.00003784814,0.000028138558,0.0123065235,0.00023842223,0.00060920167,0.98196656,0.0007906713,0.0015104178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029290785,0.000049404727,0.0030159766,0.00014055321,0.000119121534,0.000016626807,0.006804111,0.000095101444,0.0026105468,0.12927108,0.85727847,0.00030608557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002478727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056349713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8564878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053307765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016398079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7515991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081651053","doi":"10.1163/1573035053683218","title":"General Concepts of Private Law Relating to Private Property in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and in the Civil Code of Quebec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Code (set theory); Law; Russian federation; Political science; Doctrine; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.02681407542268926,"score_gpt":0.2904121342181522,"score_spread":0.26359805879546294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081651053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7476631,0.0078039,0.00004568956,0.030394344,0.000035587,0.0019776071,0.000056884506,0.0000089414525,0.21201396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540734,0.0031963687,0.00012689627,0.0010963018,0.00005175044,0.0000054183456,0.00000233088,0.000005125546,0.000108466455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983328,0.0007203599,0.00045264256,0.00012135441,0.0002178007,0.00015506348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947953,0.000042587155,0.00023675011,0.0001805478,0.000026593463,0.000033962755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012948016,0.00007736796,0.00020027685,0.00000797392,0.00016896827,0.000027559925,0.00029484095,0.000017554246,0.000009029474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005501046,0.000034394834,0.000048721944,0.00019708266,0.00037801976,0.000083581006,0.00007222224,0.00009951925,7.453934e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075351904,0.000055654316,0.0022824565,0.000518737,0.0000052471055,3.3847826e-7,0.008455443,0.000077680124,0.00060432556,0.9836484,0.00007164557,0.0042724903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053400133,0.000061251194,0.1008533,0.004833842,0.000050782524,0.0000034424681,0.00071470416,0.0002852756,0.00039400914,0.0006456172,0.89143753,0.0001862184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003232351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06590721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98300284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014881008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033871864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95113754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083683538","doi":"10.2202/1539-8323.1000","title":"`The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages' and the Morality of Contract Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Morality; Law; Exclusion clause; Breach of contract; Tort; Law and economics; Business; Privity of contract; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Liability; Management","score_opus":0.06565433591071734,"score_gpt":0.3807951665727284,"score_spread":0.31514083066201104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083683538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241324,0.002185032,0.0000028895474,0.038489264,0.00008110722,0.00039182472,0.0000051750426,0.000016905215,0.03469542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976483,0.0011519749,0.000041836876,0.00039793696,0.000101464226,0.00003258446,8.5589033e-7,0.000005733224,0.0006193315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847555,0.0005579264,0.00032919325,0.0001752883,0.00018630207,0.00027575743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866885,0.0008134849,0.0001134726,0.0002807098,0.00006347566,0.000059978334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003716252,0.00008477447,0.00018319052,0.000021374071,0.00037067113,0.00028277448,0.00049514783,0.00008628201,0.000029065797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009775611,0.000054062122,0.000040867995,0.000309385,0.0011923296,0.0005552643,0.00006699535,0.000516141,0.000010248965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000934587,0.000043352342,0.052652087,0.0000029474695,0.0000038138776,0.00000712306,0.0019533732,0.000004465207,0.00008252764,0.9429893,0.000023969218,0.002143603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010006061,0.000014962316,0.32249326,0.00006550896,0.000005841239,0.0000018803274,0.00081221404,0.00004494898,0.00014434235,0.027271714,0.64803845,0.00010625016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07427748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21645041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91571754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059352395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047291454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.931887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085848690","doi":"10.1017/s0940739105050228","title":"Is There an Expert in the House? <i>Thomson v. Christie's</i>: The Case of the Houghton Urns","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Property","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Bachelor; Film director; Art history; History; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.056451942437965134,"score_gpt":0.36909924472906885,"score_spread":0.3126473022911037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085848690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8392716,0.00056196644,0.000024575651,0.1512444,0.00029961253,0.00023185807,0.0000129619075,0.000008348455,0.00834467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951757,0.00030414088,0.000096871954,0.0023494964,0.0011951331,0.0000073378224,4.2763645e-7,0.000006406479,0.0008644623],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862784,0.00027711812,0.00034211512,0.00008415807,0.00054498,0.00012376899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899536,0.000076130615,0.00030192477,0.00016244377,0.00042455413,0.000039589304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078746147,0.00007984754,0.000094806805,0.000020561063,0.0003123573,0.00016421503,0.0013474664,0.00004438276,0.000113876784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115656316,0.0000242246,0.00014083454,0.00014899718,0.0002459368,0.00049823325,0.000059250753,0.00029351364,0.000006621848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025399943,0.0013131252,0.004936477,0.000009842481,0.00027158437,0.00024502655,0.68073916,0.001069616,0.006631267,0.06660843,0.102193005,0.13572846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033403756,0.000042427342,0.0035664914,0.000049729988,0.000014287645,0.00045152925,0.03234415,0.00025891856,0.0013473143,0.0005801301,0.96092504,0.00008592748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055756113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069192103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85873204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009375353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011446187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84286934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085925177","doi":"10.7202/1019045ar","title":"Réflexions autour de la diversité des modes de réception ou d’adaptation du trust dans les pays de droit civil","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031481138605264275,"score_gpt":0.27272276285760133,"score_spread":0.24124162425233706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085925177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4191052,0.0004329472,0.08527566,0.014814133,0.00022413372,0.00027485672,0.000114448805,0.00010743306,0.4796512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868707,0.0017948326,0.007974758,0.00026071066,0.00062904845,0.00002507934,0.000004597087,0.000022867856,0.0024173865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980546,0.0005104416,0.00029642257,0.00019410552,0.00031349124,0.00063094345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998824,0.00019328408,0.0002165868,0.00012549017,0.00018746633,0.00045319705],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010379541,0.00016762478,0.00015551466,0.000050607003,0.008561342,0.0003742562,0.0003728808,0.0002470836,0.0012381396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009151698,0.00017668454,0.00019083948,0.0002420426,0.0007900443,0.0009132223,0.00007213699,0.00050367316,0.00016626134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000677126,0.00018263608,0.004327737,0.000014319427,0.00004567018,0.0000136711,0.010391495,0.008424463,0.0011371663,0.9551322,0.0005437896,0.019780075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006330188,0.000106264124,0.045877956,0.00015270247,0.0002384384,0.00035661086,0.028232723,0.06083115,0.00046865913,0.44680265,0.4158419,0.0004579118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07257317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06685355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56776553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015085407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011351081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086104902","doi":"10.7202/043946ar","title":"La responsabilité contractuelle dans la tourmente","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.008308118538877371,"score_gpt":0.26778577065474446,"score_spread":0.2594776521158671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086104902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.586148,0.0010638528,0.0029723677,0.019325405,0.00012308148,0.00022207541,0.00006149974,0.000072259834,0.39001143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7825183,0.00045625507,0.0014245121,0.0007554585,0.00045678683,0.000035965208,0.0000050695285,0.00002056106,0.21432707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806666,0.0005699261,0.00026207158,0.000305835,0.0002628175,0.00053267454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983294,0.0009466364,0.00009925284,0.00030264322,0.00004246247,0.0002796036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013764371,0.00015958055,0.00018505522,0.00003733127,0.0006165446,0.00012956085,0.00039258454,0.00050264696,0.0005789194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023427935,0.00018370408,0.00016769354,0.00030344684,0.002119608,0.0002184737,0.00004095485,0.00067892484,0.00039943424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022252441,0.00018221982,0.00040083946,0.000013656783,0.00003019157,0.00001715067,0.024687959,0.00014114832,0.00044568483,0.86967844,0.0024088568,0.1019716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002992518,0.000024505101,0.003641169,0.00002812318,0.000050661398,0.000021111362,0.0071141184,0.0004397421,0.00027586304,0.018068826,0.96982825,0.00020835787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001925289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027431217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014563012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021798063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7809784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086644342","doi":"10.1108/01443330510791243","title":"Where does all the money go? An investigation of donation filtration","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Heaven; Preamble; Law; Economic Justice; Statute; Donation; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.03424844925212344,"score_gpt":0.37211483476035984,"score_spread":0.3378663855082364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086644342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81570345,0.00008922985,0.00011919871,0.18283153,0.00014727657,0.000061514205,0.000014016992,0.0000064997307,0.0010272819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368155,0.00041342864,0.00023859853,0.001611765,0.0038636872,0.0000032546773,0.000008862156,0.0000035838862,0.0001752818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990656,0.00022677079,0.00029491851,0.0000644798,0.00025386884,0.00009437758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899584,0.00011446269,0.00039874736,0.00003571667,0.00041123116,0.00004402876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007350948,0.000051985848,0.00009658918,0.00007313369,0.00031169882,0.00003719846,0.00026884716,0.00012465715,0.00003647128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103518134,0.00003565111,0.000061878556,0.00005184115,0.0006955354,0.0004189844,0.000021455955,0.00016453998,0.000002755192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027403501,0.00004369565,0.00501695,0.0000029957102,0.000089508016,4.0802675e-7,0.124205895,0.0000364587,0.00218835,0.85213363,0.00096764596,0.01528706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012863589,0.00014648213,0.28484294,0.000031091666,0.00008944585,0.000015532138,0.034400225,0.00023886785,0.0010338489,0.4667182,0.21093404,0.00026295558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011173057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013339029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3854154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025225588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2562729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086905955","doi":"10.7202/1007819ar","title":"“I Will Not Give You a Penny More Than You Deserve”:*Ontario v. Fraser and the (Uncertain) Right to Collectively Bargain in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Good faith; Jurisprudence; Underpinning; Meaning (existential); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Right to health; Faith; Health services; Sociology; Health care; Medicine; Engineering; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022253009406999456,"score_gpt":0.26693569428016517,"score_spread":0.24468268487316572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086905955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72442526,0.00011974563,0.000041656298,0.02704831,0.00031235212,0.0006834699,0.00010720147,0.000011068007,0.24725094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959905,0.000020392245,0.00020868915,0.0016004181,0.00020987734,0.000037117978,0.0000011233866,0.000009906503,0.0019219805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984945,0.0002092541,0.00022971653,0.00015270208,0.00040570082,0.0005081216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990782,0.00018272897,0.000101572325,0.00013026196,0.00010304396,0.00040419406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010060262,0.00012046975,0.00018416335,0.000035825422,0.003867466,0.000106319385,0.00032810424,0.00005237119,0.00038898666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010364977,0.00008170675,0.00005366236,0.00029571704,0.00018082286,0.00046947857,0.000087813874,0.00039035664,0.0000081149965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021437329,0.000104732,0.0646624,0.0000047608123,0.00007931457,0.00003508487,0.025180148,0.00020073065,0.000034076613,0.90625316,0.0025011331,0.0007300634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076589937,0.000014549702,0.036052953,0.000015946203,0.000017715145,0.000012727904,0.006066574,0.00002576515,0.00006773154,0.0013171694,0.955485,0.00015796698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95298386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016244259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053490035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087416828","doi":"10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01809.x","title":"Aristotle's Theory of Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Southern Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Citation; Moral philosophy; Sociology; Analytic philosophy; Library science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.048568168009053836,"score_gpt":0.3098308887936929,"score_spread":0.2612627207846391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087416828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45393252,0.0012683742,0.0035213039,0.037754446,0.0004056326,0.0002057036,0.000024865272,0.000023787265,0.50286335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781674,0.00009627337,0.000117628384,0.00023048223,0.0011078687,7.326094e-7,1.2780657e-7,0.0000070945957,0.0006230746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990828,0.00020125655,0.0002530183,0.000046684687,0.0003025321,0.00011368222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990512,0.00021161034,0.0003498208,0.00015086167,0.00016888433,0.000067626424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014210534,0.00005209564,0.00011578815,0.000034683882,0.00029548368,0.000017807633,0.0004872891,0.000035030098,0.00025571167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014908555,0.000031838124,0.00012465927,0.00017930995,0.000318545,0.00006747896,0.00002620184,0.00017670791,0.000067806555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006903289,0.00007272866,0.00027458306,0.000005717206,0.00004035826,0.0000041508715,0.026302269,0.000055020064,0.00030463398,0.9701928,0.00012069799,0.0025580295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019127382,0.000042637712,0.00019996104,0.000024797988,0.00011980761,0.000011126335,0.014014091,0.0000038800017,0.00003846579,0.92362225,0.061674874,0.000056814733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007221137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001517352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5438842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021869088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009254061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27998632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087499840","doi":"10.1093/library/8.4.423","title":"Unclaimed Territory: The Ballad of ‘Auld Robin Gray’ and the Assertion of Authorial Ownership","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Library","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Ballad; Assertion; Gray (unit); Art; Art history; History; Literature; Computer science; Medicine; Poetry","score_opus":0.018995794487428476,"score_gpt":0.27884909238086003,"score_spread":0.25985329789343153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087499840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7769684,0.00041906192,0.00014179427,0.10399051,0.00042971008,0.00073108374,0.000013693643,0.00006418312,0.11724157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975765,0.00004332468,0.00005741083,0.00025797787,0.00054483407,0.000007804986,0.0000023149444,0.000005202561,0.0015046463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922204,0.00023982894,0.00015834098,0.000071376955,0.00018712973,0.00012130611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991021,0.0005405834,0.00011386311,0.00020133537,0.00001192786,0.00003019004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012639192,0.00004740564,0.00008367905,0.000013495011,0.00035430587,0.00003732916,0.0004001801,0.000050655464,0.00004099359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049326383,0.000019692563,0.000050784685,0.00017984067,0.000703155,0.0001696296,0.0000802666,0.00011649541,0.000002650189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010147153,0.000018981014,0.0012148313,0.0000044524195,0.000013938723,1.0840053e-7,0.008291034,0.000002987937,0.00085879094,0.98482144,0.002779653,0.0018923054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013909817,0.0000672486,0.06966464,0.000042868494,0.00009748377,0.0000011930224,0.01701867,0.00019912301,0.013771837,0.21847622,0.67906886,0.00020088407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010922174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024695374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000055320997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066079105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.272507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208829756","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada: Its History, Powers and Responsibilities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Court of record; Jurisdiction; Majority opinion; Political science; Constitution; Appeal; Court of equity; Sociology","score_opus":0.033611701399108226,"score_gpt":0.29595418695150155,"score_spread":0.2623424855523933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208829756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69075185,0.037929606,0.000012726586,0.16332193,0.00020959164,0.00024017935,0.000004790228,0.0000055520018,0.107523754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846417,0.011031775,0.0000169597,0.00028593733,0.000069810936,4.880093e-7,2.5230184e-8,0.000003432588,0.003949884],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909425,0.00020443813,0.0002106294,0.00004612951,0.00031918543,0.00012535787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997729,0.0013990809,0.00039435487,0.00007769122,0.00032964154,0.000070232534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002355822,0.000048244838,0.00008844149,0.000014249447,0.00047492434,0.00003273829,0.00019394781,0.000024978392,0.000045639048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008393072,0.000027034148,0.000014380658,0.000072611016,0.00025550314,0.00028873733,0.000020691934,0.00017796988,7.852302e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029128452,0.00032776373,0.0011347033,0.00035583324,0.00056896143,0.000034688397,0.63370156,0.00030247206,0.0021375425,0.1338865,0.20000273,0.024634391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001199018,0.000050340583,0.00014048522,0.000017742579,0.000061091094,0.000041138133,0.042360783,0.00008755069,0.0001281019,0.0010243194,0.95592034,0.00004819438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020928504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03903581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7559176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006636493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005164253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98559123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089711025","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0015","title":"Formalism in Music and Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Theoretical physics; Political science; Physics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.03416187840239202,"score_gpt":0.2359458338655684,"score_spread":0.20178395546317637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089711025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11810296,0.00012692771,0.00008562655,0.00020609266,0.00003616037,0.000039217746,0.0000021080868,0.000005358541,0.8813955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983583,0.00018650043,0.0009949302,0.0000496355,0.000029571938,1.6430297e-8,1.3392894e-7,0.0000010484518,0.00037988144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997155,0.00002856292,0.000047504873,0.000041376745,0.00007670824,0.00009034967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998023,0.000008903352,0.00004532667,0.00003875691,0.00003198804,0.00007271576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001843878,0.00002390149,0.000049985654,0.0000057220514,0.00046345463,0.000010649883,0.00012700158,0.000029560813,0.00086841854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000022469885,0.000026162854,0.000022811158,0.000013635316,0.00020717917,0.00047009793,0.000032882028,0.000055088152,0.0000022266854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007522479,0.000020662554,0.0005663376,0.0000010587289,0.0000034904065,0.0000050972044,0.030433957,2.5174674e-7,0.000012361045,0.96794003,0.000107588115,0.0009016364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054326246,0.000039256152,0.018337132,0.000017745835,0.000015031218,0.0000065691715,0.044472173,0.000012160646,0.000023813887,0.010171486,0.92626673,0.00009460966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5179338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84696174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95776856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008041928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023058736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9508574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091780201","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqi030","title":"General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Generality; Philosophy of law; Black letter law; Value (mathematics); Positive law; Comparative law; Sociology; Political science; Private law; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.0382762265684625,"score_gpt":0.3736142316878724,"score_spread":0.33533800511940987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091780201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76576066,0.0115743885,0.00052770285,0.047737982,0.00066579686,0.00019567179,0.000009227671,0.000044463442,0.1734841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769971,0.006196701,0.0035304555,0.0004525967,0.0023725308,0.0000033576046,2.2983221e-7,0.0000073670576,0.010439667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988344,0.000068941845,0.0003153301,0.00009846262,0.00043214724,0.00025075866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991407,0.000062602885,0.00025354096,0.00008471226,0.00033686517,0.0001216197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006438017,0.000092750684,0.00022199098,0.00006431331,0.0006610644,0.000077777324,0.00031323347,0.000042748834,0.00006872549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012394309,0.00007256205,0.0001407474,0.00020824446,0.0002695031,0.0006431108,0.00007237585,0.00021481169,0.000014244279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010294669,0.000354448,0.008719889,0.000024625,0.00061048137,0.00010217305,0.050970044,0.0006972366,0.00049817335,0.7747021,0.09025398,0.07296392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002381653,0.000056123652,0.0014489678,0.00002157204,0.000035525376,0.00001140431,0.00453082,0.000021563259,0.00007695444,0.0007676426,0.9926982,0.00009305549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001822492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000613426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90244424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024147888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029008032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50844395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209244313","doi":"","title":"The Passing of Palsgraf","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Injustice; Duty; Res ipsa loquitur; Law; Liability; Warrant; Contributory negligence; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Damages; Correlative; Tort; Business; Restitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014385366736749845,"score_gpt":0.3074557942666959,"score_spread":0.29307042752994605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209244313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7046636,0.008289178,0.014416679,0.06846827,0.00038223164,0.0002971149,0.0000015440661,0.000061645485,0.20341976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810284,0.013561127,0.000022147635,0.00003296293,0.0002892657,0.000002070378,1.2903125e-7,0.000003754732,0.0050601773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861306,0.0000722884,0.00013431195,0.000049573526,0.0001978645,0.0009329097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996336,0.0000802248,0.0001013475,0.00008018938,0.00006281777,0.00004181672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018989571,0.00003468722,0.000048827802,0.0000150617325,0.0012704565,0.000068338166,0.0002612622,0.000025788338,0.000020020032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007298303,0.000022845017,0.000056846453,0.00017241188,0.0001326164,0.000077720186,0.000013826331,0.00048257023,0.000010825205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035577225,0.00001070061,0.0012712372,1.6745051e-7,0.000012782052,1.8140786e-7,0.0003973804,0.000003504998,0.00007867989,0.9433989,0.00008320641,0.054739714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008555511,0.000023495826,0.00071008794,0.0000034064615,0.000007511363,0.000017017723,0.007479757,0.000011768095,0.000019694811,0.43423903,0.55736303,0.000039648927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006348228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013183264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5572798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023933304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014219604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97714525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209330860","doi":"","title":"Parent to Child Transfers: Gift or Resulting Trust?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Property (philosophy); Database transaction; Law and economics; Business; Voluntary association; Transaction cost; Turnover; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.017862903066787925,"score_gpt":0.3213200954850756,"score_spread":0.30345719241828767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209330860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86828905,0.00019277594,0.0063985055,0.055610407,0.00055142544,0.00048458797,0.000010691163,0.00011423524,0.06834834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424154,0.0006272739,0.00021940721,0.0002896309,0.0011923742,0.000013352426,0.0000010662808,0.000012759825,0.0034025712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997607,0.000056444333,0.00021756237,0.0001687505,0.00030142802,0.001648832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946654,0.000043917466,0.000056531957,0.0001395717,0.00006907643,0.00022436994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019019174,0.00009053953,0.000103003775,0.000055722136,0.0012727483,0.00014728168,0.00042825507,0.00007500837,0.00016972753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020049863,0.00007066519,0.000083692226,0.0002838521,0.00006451533,0.00015901754,0.000019519928,0.0018443549,0.000079449856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043898075,0.000060758954,0.00066287327,0.0000011962177,0.000029640052,0.0000013469609,0.0042356323,0.00001802175,0.00073469005,0.9304013,0.00018818706,0.06362245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005960746,0.00024332422,0.0014994631,0.000016627519,0.000029632452,0.000076151715,0.01712094,0.000026759055,0.00015059154,0.05425488,0.92569876,0.00028681982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009861179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07852999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9255105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002792092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019022551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094653475","doi":"10.7202/042368ar","title":"La nouvelle justice naturelle : l'administrateur « équitable et raisonnable »","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Political science; Statutory law; Writ; Context (archaeology); Duty; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.013359517374735326,"score_gpt":0.2988544118574932,"score_spread":0.28549489448275783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094653475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20030828,0.00028689837,0.0040953313,0.009468693,0.000093140516,0.00020562291,0.000022993927,0.00016888826,0.78535014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85765916,0.0001760696,0.0030148018,0.0015171743,0.0002838344,0.000029299614,0.000008587071,0.000015890775,0.13729517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988558,0.00012071709,0.00014521625,0.00022030302,0.00022544498,0.00043247768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992812,0.00022735554,0.000060722137,0.0001969154,0.000047143345,0.0001866126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079405104,0.000101646096,0.00011534526,0.00003713321,0.0008650466,0.00015339843,0.0003337062,0.00028930287,0.0003960813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017560185,0.00011025887,0.00007025403,0.0002677141,0.0003025125,0.00020065923,0.000035185367,0.00051070895,0.00022915639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008605723,0.00009042077,0.000081586746,0.000016673144,0.0000123714835,0.000006925452,0.016220877,0.00021541807,0.00039220965,0.9612096,0.015752159,0.005993179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017656301,0.000012667113,0.00022546084,0.000007401859,0.000031955195,0.000004127744,0.010281549,0.00019797319,0.0003942278,0.0056605563,0.9828545,0.0001530492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010838467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028209954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036730964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032333558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6653326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094733356","doi":"10.7202/1020653ar","title":"Le cas des inaptes juridiques et leur (ir)responsabilité civile","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01702386360015871,"score_gpt":0.2808126431122535,"score_spread":0.2637887795120948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094733356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84280765,0.0021288672,0.0020941496,0.03263279,0.0001669136,0.00044606777,0.000047010282,0.00014320789,0.11953334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91629416,0.00090880523,0.0029728166,0.001335253,0.0002255641,0.00017261866,0.000009859973,0.000035273024,0.07804564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979043,0.00041080045,0.0003177366,0.00039666693,0.00026366534,0.0007068301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984288,0.0005760722,0.000122048645,0.00037798594,0.00014950449,0.00034557292],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076351553,0.00021765631,0.0002501617,0.00006243768,0.0010352213,0.00029523714,0.00049428106,0.00040091423,0.00094508013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038883157,0.0002488874,0.00019164252,0.00045168126,0.0027885435,0.0006419915,0.00008978863,0.00056318427,0.0008301233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006475384,0.00015108338,0.0026771326,0.000050104616,0.000031393254,0.0000054814745,0.021695249,0.0000313269,0.000711583,0.93954635,0.003951351,0.031142466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017635847,0.00006754539,0.030574517,0.000053544045,0.00003510158,0.000010965533,0.006464633,0.00021169313,0.0008022073,0.35322335,0.6080313,0.00034883057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07469581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026907243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6040799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009662858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067394593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095422546","doi":"10.7202/043896ar","title":"La libération de la caution par la mise en oeuvre de l’article 2363 du Code civil du Québec : de la théorie à la pratique","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0045975792614745105,"score_gpt":0.24645200939975212,"score_spread":0.24185443013827762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095422546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8251358,0.00048447098,0.019996295,0.043089632,0.000047641915,0.00028022644,0.00004469127,0.00015841848,0.11076282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848691,0.0010540592,0.0029879392,0.0009780013,0.0007641893,0.00013564462,0.000013706742,0.00004155336,0.009155776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960225,0.0024475155,0.00032146394,0.0003380059,0.0002557088,0.0006147627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698836,0.0021663005,0.00016894391,0.000253125,0.0000632422,0.00036004046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031953752,0.00022031007,0.00020512032,0.000047460668,0.0007976737,0.00037077244,0.00035635167,0.0009483682,0.00020354422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007448539,0.00025593134,0.00014667277,0.0003473349,0.0015230669,0.00041124187,0.000053416636,0.0008966609,0.00008507003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028469824,0.00036646883,0.015755795,0.000043788965,0.000049618648,0.000055327913,0.08601802,0.002018735,0.003919068,0.87103814,0.0052548978,0.015451674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059718284,0.000037157424,0.020815453,0.00006429989,0.00013595009,0.00012509513,0.005966341,0.013711017,0.0028543025,0.040784217,0.914545,0.0003639786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029985454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09857038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90929013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027256412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00236067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097717937","doi":"10.1093/jel/14.3.421","title":"Intergenerational Trusts and Environmental Protection","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Environmental health; Environmental planning; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.020480590108337728,"score_gpt":0.22956329343212947,"score_spread":0.20908270332379175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097717937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97883075,0.00048273156,0.00035056216,0.0031519465,0.00015681004,0.00017272694,0.000028213026,0.0000068792,0.01681937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977997,0.0004040229,0.0002534821,0.00013295891,0.00029290564,0.0000036589486,0.0000014226144,0.0000048917477,0.0011069897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999386,0.000043227716,0.0001758645,0.000070567505,0.00023293895,0.00009137411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997322,0.000011968017,0.00011739488,0.00004466358,0.0000013588614,0.000092433824],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014340699,0.000051769854,0.000065744614,0.000020227108,0.00030443174,0.000034799363,0.00007154299,0.000038605885,0.0015983761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000040089503,0.000047152473,0.00004488193,0.000019360654,0.00023292209,0.00026605645,0.00002453254,0.00010704398,0.000036624468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009643282,0.0029182138,0.014832481,0.00001727244,0.00023710377,0.000058879814,0.017282581,0.0003855835,0.2704713,0.57001615,0.004597385,0.119086646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053397927,0.00018348476,0.0076725,0.000009791061,0.000026060277,0.000076564684,0.0013178532,0.00039684205,0.0016461667,0.0017341184,0.9862451,0.00015756655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003315721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039244307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012335915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000035079022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097724759","doi":"10.7202/1009065ar","title":"Toward A Federal Legal Theory of the City","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Institution; Politics; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political economy","score_opus":0.06941978909998069,"score_gpt":0.31631197118256693,"score_spread":0.24689218208258623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097724759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07493787,0.0000805039,0.00016848785,0.0044246316,0.0004438673,0.00009043185,0.000015376547,0.000013777293,0.9198251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982049,0.000013659109,0.00014904766,0.00031065414,0.0004730326,0.0000022319564,1.1392055e-7,0.000003866959,0.00084251293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915373,0.00017938323,0.00013830613,0.00004393691,0.0002561131,0.00022855347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956805,0.00005255925,0.00010480885,0.00009437584,0.000059672275,0.00012051726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010358492,0.000044178913,0.00006889989,0.000008065828,0.0036642544,0.000048693335,0.0002760774,0.00003790708,0.00031529338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006167503,0.000027569095,0.000107288906,0.000090116584,0.00022042416,0.00026336964,0.000057548346,0.00020423262,0.000013336921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035474698,0.00003765034,0.0016158588,9.4989645e-7,0.000007887315,2.1812353e-7,0.0007808519,0.0000011509379,0.000038649534,0.996101,0.00014144478,0.001270756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008433366,0.000005478788,0.0059030927,0.000005839406,0.000008549359,0.000014546447,0.0010155544,7.3673715e-7,0.00051150756,0.011460994,0.9809439,0.000045451598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021060708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030405154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98464006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055864683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019045758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99763286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098201070","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2325","title":"The stripping of the trust: A study in legal evolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Liability; Economic Justice; Creditor; Business; Externality; Value (mathematics); Distributive property; Welfare; Stripping (fiber); Law and economics; Point (geometry); Inequality; Punitive damages; Service (business); Public economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Debt; Economics; Law; Finance; Microeconomics; Marketing","score_opus":0.010026889588759615,"score_gpt":0.24335590176580496,"score_spread":0.23332901217704535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098201070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8405874,0.000099840276,0.0004527329,0.0015280533,0.00012255182,0.00017348993,0.0000016792847,0.00000419614,0.1570301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991787,0.000026172049,0.000040465053,0.0000056314216,0.000047043584,3.9188485e-8,2.7552028e-8,8.861495e-7,0.00070100446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994026,0.00019441542,0.00008194749,0.00004159534,0.00019232731,0.00008714408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996352,0.000052047744,0.00012376462,0.000093064344,0.00006705382,0.000028848655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007157865,0.000024597302,0.000054601634,0.000004951105,0.0011898421,0.00001965053,0.0003708207,0.000019881414,0.000045231976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035195364,0.000017348042,0.00004906013,0.00004131327,0.00019034327,0.00020029652,0.00005232221,0.00008700098,5.3096323e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021050508,0.00010383607,0.026488926,0.0000012409557,0.000015193487,4.4355605e-7,0.015664218,0.000101761856,0.00007009811,0.9550242,0.00015555762,0.0023534957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007401208,0.00008020921,0.468405,0.00002404917,0.000028865335,0.00000123235,0.12402359,0.00030902252,0.0000092634045,0.0020174717,0.40429747,0.000063685016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29743934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76122105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9530067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025439766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007916148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9151424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098784701","doi":"","title":"Judicial Independence and the Administration of the Judiciary in Trinidad and Tobago","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Caribbean dialogue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Administration (probate law); Judicial independence; Political science; Control (management); Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.010329785135524936,"score_gpt":0.2627390759528027,"score_spread":0.25240929081727775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098784701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534299,0.00016592062,0.0000057339203,0.008673062,0.0000522545,0.00034427724,0.00001957755,0.000008246128,0.03730108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992271,0.00022628068,0.000009849443,0.0003102258,0.000109747816,0.00001887499,0.0000019701786,0.0000025261772,0.00009342131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999321,0.00015312339,0.00014615619,0.00011302821,0.00015881492,0.000107873966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995989,0.00016502972,0.00004820847,0.00012451998,0.00002150908,0.000041835214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058951013,0.000046751695,0.00009473465,0.000013384978,0.0002687111,0.00003501243,0.00016055381,0.000063966654,0.000026983676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017619636,0.000029863357,0.000025209833,0.00018109109,0.00071092416,0.00007119253,0.000035304718,0.00012680382,0.0000022102458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002507224,0.000083228704,0.033647228,0.000008626475,0.000014813082,0.0000031598313,0.027897235,0.000020672813,0.00011404732,0.88647026,0.0007182457,0.05077179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022278342,0.00005616798,0.81500083,0.000048606045,0.000053620395,0.0000057682414,0.0050029154,0.00014458917,0.00034491293,0.13206351,0.04481601,0.0002352174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012035273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027590076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7813536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015704001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016995776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102091871","doi":"","title":"Identity verification in conveyancing: The failure of current legislative and regulatory measures, and recommendations for change","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conveyancing; Legislature; Identity (music); Land registration; Business; Legislative process; Law; Political science; Land tenure; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.07919075346162456,"score_gpt":0.3006850063940702,"score_spread":0.22149425293244562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102091871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99077433,0.0007264436,0.0012428651,0.0019145736,0.00013157219,0.0005757819,0.00008185174,0.000014061293,0.0045385016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951196,0.000070495174,0.00012736942,0.0000053585572,0.000052658525,0.0000024683115,0.000008306432,0.000002459211,0.00021890944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956024,0.000041849762,0.00008604128,0.00009719865,0.000120238044,0.00009445753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995304,0.000088778135,0.0001422453,0.00010118647,0.00008739551,0.00005004433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024812348,0.000042649728,0.00008124974,0.00003587507,0.00038742973,0.000042764776,0.00010904644,0.000033847664,0.0000018022689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037613794,0.000045237153,0.000029520119,0.00011577851,0.0003279131,0.0013111356,0.000051389812,0.000051326548,4.7655547e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005878216,0.00030546362,0.23759864,0.000117756455,0.000059674738,4.1101117e-7,0.1379894,0.000001691028,0.0014329249,0.5796263,0.0017661467,0.041042805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041266464,0.000031944313,0.4766063,0.00006723106,0.00004269171,0.0000014084445,0.032646667,0.000060973634,0.0001804157,0.0014485512,0.48835757,0.00014356818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006742687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013786172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57817775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004669343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038675724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29798353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104210821","doi":"10.7202/043593ar","title":"Les clauses abusives dans les contrats d'adhésion","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Civil code; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02027449894832291,"score_gpt":0.28925038494075206,"score_spread":0.26897588599242916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104210821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80421865,0.006135169,0.010322675,0.021935787,0.00029779144,0.00037903382,0.000104134626,0.00015897761,0.15644778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901049,0.00246135,0.0021450405,0.0007269383,0.001284946,0.000043733085,0.000018144357,0.000034274537,0.092236534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978962,0.00020757961,0.00036918328,0.00043149517,0.00035953746,0.00073601725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998768,0.0003044084,0.00018230431,0.0003197367,0.00009908467,0.00032649408],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040886458,0.00025896262,0.00027946837,0.00006244344,0.0016664852,0.00018361735,0.00053524325,0.0006232227,0.0007140942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011939665,0.0002830756,0.0002159199,0.00038919377,0.0020012376,0.00035643837,0.000054060776,0.0006516234,0.0003098282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114332115,0.00015740754,0.0025697863,0.000030415622,0.00004529733,0.0000096490785,0.033523235,0.00033123392,0.0022441468,0.8045394,0.0019552012,0.1545828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003590976,0.000047740778,0.011767297,0.00008931087,0.00010617906,0.000011362502,0.014323217,0.00067153847,0.0018945376,0.013181051,0.957132,0.0004167098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01210377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019931111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9551768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013522181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017867627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106469123","doi":"","title":"Chinese \"Administrative Suit Law Amendment\" Review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.12695442448381722,"score_gpt":0.4869668691821506,"score_spread":0.3600124446983334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106469123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19486405,0.013266343,0.000018525605,0.030782545,0.00009679736,0.00085312186,0.00003226658,0.00024365837,0.7598427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98978436,0.003578134,0.00056175323,0.0013595594,0.000091340706,0.000116859075,0.00014952547,0.000006731673,0.004351742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889964,0.00021661179,0.00025225058,0.0001552766,0.00028587977,0.00019033207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842113,0.0000811258,0.00015546856,0.00058560306,0.00058339565,0.0001732759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007871154,0.00010555253,0.000144235,0.000008652194,0.0011076719,0.00042123496,0.0007351058,0.00006106683,0.00010199422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035197125,0.000080456084,0.00006770749,0.00028932563,0.0008607226,0.00088924356,0.00014182238,0.00017782002,0.00025958486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007932004,0.00008582544,0.0013872089,0.000035817917,0.000012798203,3.72133e-7,0.008639477,0.0000036310144,0.00015382198,0.97561365,0.011963339,0.0020961214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017738914,0.000018160037,0.0009466488,0.00009044497,0.00001174123,0.0000011834184,0.0015604071,0.000006506985,0.00006041089,0.008159175,0.98883104,0.00013688514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027956285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032309855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97686774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018210037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012098683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85194284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106526324","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2222836","title":"The Public Fiduciary: Emerging Themes in Canadian Fiduciary Law for Pension Trustees","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Pension; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Business; Law; Liability; Law and economics; Supreme court; Political science; Economics; Finance; Duty","score_opus":0.014802968616249074,"score_gpt":0.28703577595112956,"score_spread":0.2722328073348805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106526324","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42988008,0.008808989,0.00036076814,0.45512772,0.0008125475,0.0020819143,0.000010840331,0.000082043734,0.10283508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99454206,0.0018025715,0.000036736492,0.00040690266,0.0004227884,0.00007451269,0.0000026503863,0.000012727406,0.0026990485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996836,0.00011442864,0.00021138818,0.00014307449,0.00020021317,0.0024948907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992769,0.00016078194,0.00008747491,0.00014325127,0.00012770527,0.00020392104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024961862,0.000086824526,0.00009376907,0.000074278934,0.0027727492,0.0003591874,0.000468911,0.000067443725,0.00007525166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018713508,0.00006259479,0.00008092903,0.00019487934,0.000115721174,0.00041175506,0.000023667199,0.00070333073,0.000037392732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016812636,0.000010109441,0.0006738513,6.563724e-7,0.000012414703,2.1796606e-7,0.00086679106,0.0000040255272,0.00002262538,0.9815579,0.00092620245,0.015923519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014088725,0.000021091944,0.0005673105,0.000005304749,0.0000047187664,0.000006712774,0.011071853,0.000114299095,0.0000075803414,0.47023088,0.51773936,0.00009001233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52985877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9894693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.564662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012121157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049844407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109971841","doi":"","title":"Trust Law Implications of Proposed Regulatory Reform of Mutual Fund Governance Structures A Background Research Report to Concept Proposal 81-402 of the Canadian Securities Administrators","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Law and economics; Mutual fund; Regulatory reform; Finance; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.11331000599369091,"score_gpt":0.38142877941441483,"score_spread":0.26811877342072393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109971841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6217577,0.000081174665,0.0000026259058,0.008680033,0.00005513847,0.00092084345,0.00027238065,0.000014434594,0.3682157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339616,0.000009610048,0.00038336896,0.00007753066,0.00007848679,0.000035908095,0.0000041267663,0.000009824437,0.006004974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980535,0.000115202834,0.0004991453,0.00024256927,0.0007417811,0.00034778155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981801,0.00006865245,0.0002620769,0.0006566304,0.0006062548,0.00022629781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006509399,0.00009353508,0.00018862516,0.00004668824,0.0007824614,0.000044536002,0.00065139774,0.000116352065,0.00051849184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010148468,0.000068085756,0.00008119916,0.0006864899,0.0021713048,0.00013952346,0.00008896091,0.0001846406,0.000003407114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042504153,0.000038614427,0.0010835493,0.000020968126,0.00001273442,7.2689227e-7,0.0047333315,0.0000023226896,0.00059154315,0.9910617,0.0022695842,0.00018068078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005689748,0.00039088388,0.25970218,0.00013929754,0.000048786525,0.00002426915,0.0553582,0.000027745327,0.056683104,0.04390436,0.5825997,0.0005524941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5638499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89175606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9471573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046101646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018268109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80002636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109974976","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12114","title":"<i>Righting Educational Wrongs: Disability Studies in Law and Education</i> . By Arlene S. Kanter and Beth A. Ferri, eds. Syracuse: Syracuse Univ. Press, 2013. 402 pp. $45.00 cloth.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Citation; Sociology; Library science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.030625592569466318,"score_gpt":0.35602749078630247,"score_spread":0.3254018982168361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109974976","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012828301,0.91401947,0.0000058006044,0.050261747,0.00023961348,0.0013288333,0.000055510318,0.000070182,0.02119055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09051418,0.8975333,0.00091647526,0.008861463,0.00043249284,0.00036656734,0.00004637119,0.000022498409,0.0013066705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998039,0.00031609889,0.00048249486,0.0005094634,0.00030987276,0.00034304574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859923,0.00046913582,0.00021099839,0.00036086727,0.00017575182,0.00018398771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015387516,0.00021877943,0.00044731286,0.0000012393361,0.00087640056,0.00014039024,0.00023592662,0.000117621195,0.000062496445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014460806,0.00018281567,0.00012583449,0.00021227017,0.0018966545,0.0004896466,0.0001640622,0.00028139685,0.000013690266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016151834,0.00038572532,0.0038673382,0.0017774429,0.000058767004,5.5091505e-8,0.0029880567,5.2880694e-7,0.000018273266,0.804925,0.18020788,0.005769275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014057581,0.000010154536,0.00065191445,0.000963136,0.00007044604,0.0000011142281,0.00076921814,0.000009757493,0.0000063012103,0.0074071693,0.9897425,0.00022771386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073458357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042346106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8095346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020924835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017262362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110013063","doi":"10.1017/s0008197300300101","title":"<scp>A DUTY TO GIVE REASONS?</scp>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Estate; Duty; Aside; Law; Flannery; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.019805880869202878,"score_gpt":0.2934907427046273,"score_spread":0.27368486183542445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110013063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22384171,0.0001226133,0.000111440924,0.020340964,0.00014472131,0.00017702722,0.00001699278,0.00004379539,0.75520074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9501119,0.00021956833,0.0002117788,0.0030054194,0.0014755822,0.000012744256,0.0000010551684,0.000011776697,0.044950157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876714,0.0001760773,0.00017736305,0.00012603209,0.0003645964,0.00038878692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991142,0.00018484551,0.000064674176,0.00022524055,0.00008725765,0.00032378713],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096123,0.00008650787,0.00010454668,0.000016946036,0.0025012468,0.000300765,0.00057197886,0.00004861067,0.00031090347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009188597,0.000059960767,0.000096546006,0.00025775383,0.00021289458,0.00016868177,0.000038728092,0.0003284068,0.0012706459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005405561,0.000042897285,0.00015807258,0.0000010466016,0.00002110584,0.00001192799,0.004872522,0.00006876848,0.0000885641,0.78460133,0.19887386,0.011254522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101074846,0.00001816308,0.0029831463,0.0000096317135,0.000014255611,0.000041775904,0.0016274024,0.0000094564075,0.00007166953,0.0013938264,0.99369174,0.00003785878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00426356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020609833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79481786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009407198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010257484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211088897","doi":"","title":"The Reasonable Person: A Conceptual Biography in Comparative Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reasonable person; Law; Tort; Skepticism; Comparative law; Private law; Criminal law; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023740254445170018,"score_gpt":0.3239102165118101,"score_spread":0.3001699620666401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211088897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8228942,0.0031169746,0.0002160505,0.025057107,0.00027625647,0.00036934513,0.0000039599713,0.000038608625,0.14802746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99605805,0.0013262569,0.000041188207,0.00005309365,0.00038375615,0.000017067625,3.9474287e-7,0.0000049189757,0.0021152932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980265,0.00013769935,0.00011594577,0.00013697964,0.00023755028,0.0013453503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942636,0.00014486548,0.00008864677,0.000104158265,0.00015305851,0.00008290521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018957204,0.00007681783,0.000095611984,0.000054144384,0.0015419606,0.00014126461,0.00037795492,0.00005985343,0.000042097032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008530554,0.000054167464,0.00009035771,0.0004628256,0.0006652366,0.00016653567,0.000015898135,0.0020872334,0.000027232096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011177165,0.000028553099,0.0012393304,7.484289e-8,0.000022227174,4.0437257e-7,0.01891178,0.0000014890829,0.00010330373,0.9789129,0.00017332911,0.0005954654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028507353,0.0000605356,0.0018338852,0.0000027029962,0.000007681869,0.00001584299,0.5399448,0.000021386819,0.000015378566,0.2899547,0.16775483,0.00010316908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056070318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21235353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68895817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048604232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025108552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111865073","doi":"","title":"From Foundations to Finish? The Continuing Duty Doctrine and Limitations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Doctrine; Watson; Statutory law; Appeal; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Engineering; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02266798070662438,"score_gpt":0.29965185991891025,"score_spread":0.27698387921228584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111865073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8324567,0.00057570415,0.010926582,0.13269205,0.00014675842,0.00050182233,0.000007800171,0.000045252247,0.02264733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937616,0.0012941457,0.00033024905,0.0003121342,0.0005583562,0.000042972057,0.0000031497823,0.000005775261,0.0036916388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874175,0.000078836456,0.00014976674,0.00010909157,0.00016034582,0.00076021726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925256,0.00034876904,0.00006680796,0.0001074151,0.00011839244,0.000106044106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072233315,0.00005797425,0.00006487557,0.000030218609,0.00095057255,0.00036588975,0.00023126788,0.000029690977,0.00011281921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033302,0.000042472217,0.000037330152,0.00019723532,0.000086149485,0.00025862746,0.000036707286,0.0005226318,0.00021592963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015607404,0.000017409897,0.0004637019,1.9839611e-7,0.000028720255,8.343215e-8,0.009442,0.000011966267,0.00019167559,0.9079038,0.0008211869,0.08111769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016417624,0.00003461146,0.007975774,0.0000058686987,0.00002232352,0.000004987147,0.025855545,0.000056787798,0.0000069883504,0.515706,0.4500711,0.00009587092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057215816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03481347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4492499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019490818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005219162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9827987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112539498","doi":"","title":"Calculating Judgment Interest After Bank of America Canada v. Mutual Trust Co.: Difficulties Compounded","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Restitution; Law; Context (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Creditor; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Debt","score_opus":0.04295107980467761,"score_gpt":0.3259100329100433,"score_spread":0.2829589531053657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112539498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891082,0.0012394211,0.00012901227,0.006015568,0.000301088,0.00012995547,0.00003556429,0.000011208702,0.00302995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827033,0.00022527386,0.00068751344,0.00029989952,0.00027346218,0.0000067257233,0.0000011926587,0.000009142226,0.00022645447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843,0.00006828952,0.00059417763,0.00011336201,0.0005396104,0.00025453977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878347,0.0001356588,0.0005048677,0.00010094916,0.00035888568,0.000116196024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000263942,0.00013405795,0.00039771592,0.000051259096,0.00042354097,0.000053423882,0.00025151292,0.00003305901,0.00002506565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017929907,0.00010329623,0.00012487371,0.00018899293,0.00047760742,0.00018594485,0.00008634229,0.00021754793,0.0000023902337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017557355,0.003956617,0.11885704,0.0008107871,0.007806466,0.001664986,0.5025814,0.021557717,0.00996731,0.21419102,0.08788276,0.028968133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022156,0.00047446473,0.056133788,0.00047708373,0.0002513426,0.0000428077,0.15425971,0.000026472862,0.0018253769,0.0009183331,0.7827468,0.00062825705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25906372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54615945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.694864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004933759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063458574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74587023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113105916","doi":"","title":"The Charter and Administrative Law: Cross-Fertilization or Inconstancy?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Administrative law; Agency (philosophy); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.023738735050630427,"score_gpt":0.34684056921444884,"score_spread":0.32310183416381844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113105916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.759499,0.0032065501,0.005368686,0.04706325,0.000325817,0.001153869,0.0000069207126,0.00009895931,0.18327694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98803633,0.0024532783,0.000023774865,0.0001952934,0.0002021264,0.000024213885,5.796228e-7,0.0000053338144,0.009059087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986851,0.00008108031,0.00014906924,0.00009274166,0.00015968831,0.00083232136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995414,0.00009996626,0.00008304158,0.00007526274,0.00012071967,0.00007962317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008432631,0.00005897958,0.000055194465,0.000010859285,0.0020629372,0.00050346396,0.00016807808,0.000042751657,0.00009538637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066632696,0.00003482185,0.000025974783,0.00009421295,0.00034816412,0.00035476027,0.000025982072,0.0004536812,0.000041135838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009440826,0.000009746559,0.00064091367,4.461523e-7,0.000013165169,1.403861e-7,0.0010190201,2.9655848e-7,0.000032189386,0.98800623,0.00007852794,0.010189888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002842662,0.00011486031,0.003308123,0.0000064421133,0.000009506969,0.000029946328,0.014596282,0.000045801517,0.00004012291,0.84339297,0.1380569,0.0001147978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075160665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029927678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2285373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021046182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013865975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113299159","doi":"10.1017/s0008197313000482","title":"WINNERS AND LOSERS: <i>EDWARDS</i> AND THE UNFAIR LAW OF DISMISSAL","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Statutory law; Dismissal; Law; Common law; Statute; Political science; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Unfair dismissal; Discipline","score_opus":0.009136205729693987,"score_gpt":0.2503988532783828,"score_spread":0.2412626475486888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113299159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49408218,0.0012081995,0.00013747999,0.12033927,0.00015461502,0.0004778002,0.000013285003,0.000023041075,0.38356414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971922,0.0003955663,0.000056400353,0.0014907743,0.00028398552,0.000007947885,3.3175073e-7,0.0000056371414,0.0005671705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919456,0.00017306929,0.00016407046,0.00007568164,0.00021256604,0.00018006228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993698,0.00019778252,0.00011213189,0.00013064565,0.00007367925,0.00011596148],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090822275,0.00006503565,0.00011368262,0.0000068597374,0.001336882,0.0002259532,0.00025581094,0.000031391904,0.000026059874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000254532,0.000032290023,0.000048406928,0.0000780218,0.0020140256,0.00022251655,0.00007064048,0.00021045089,0.000008774665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010216783,0.0000083653995,0.00009527994,0.0000025113088,0.00001640898,4.5511172e-7,0.0018103662,0.0000023288367,0.00009591206,0.99366206,0.0033080943,0.0009879739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017115499,0.0000487226,0.004632402,0.00004345949,0.000102066995,0.00009825711,0.015075052,0.000203044,0.0003026514,0.05155934,0.92601115,0.00021230089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01617423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001386222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94210273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015040355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034255103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115506377","doi":"","title":"NEWFOUNDLAND CAPITAL CORPORATION LIMITED","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Capital (architecture); Business; Finance; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.03411815712247086,"score_gpt":0.3009563213323683,"score_spread":0.2668381642098975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115506377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21756646,0.000015314696,0.0021633625,0.001260438,0.00007676176,0.00010538195,9.398352e-7,0.000060130933,0.7787512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821581,0.000012134481,0.00073629065,0.00019716447,0.000058757643,0.0000072911407,0.000003239269,0.0000021614358,0.016824808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996594,0.00003196655,0.000054947188,0.0000684358,0.00009511638,0.00009012358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980235,0.0000234753,0.000020321848,0.00006456633,0.000036625108,0.00005264596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014116586,0.000025603676,0.000028020326,0.000011979521,0.000280622,0.00006929926,0.00004725621,0.000027470896,0.0005918846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054653436,0.000022701888,0.000015254044,0.00012756036,0.000047289486,0.000118923,0.0000037761806,0.00002782132,0.00023347791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.926577e-7,0.000013182436,0.004219005,2.5549332e-7,0.0000011261949,1.15712076e-7,0.0008174402,0.0000027143915,0.00009660973,0.9934744,0.0010646925,0.00031013772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084932246,0.0000069410235,0.0035205684,6.2856554e-7,0.0000026431474,2.8741346e-7,0.0017317124,0.000021512755,0.00006683085,0.021251347,0.97325355,0.000059069203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056767175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029292258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9722231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030913776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074182135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116210297","doi":"10.1177/0309089206068841","title":"Safekeeping, Borrowing, and Rental","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Study of the Old Testament","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tyndale University","funders":"","keywords":"Renting; Payment; Law; Property (philosophy); Old Testament; Business; History; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Finance; Archaeology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025360825533356796,"score_gpt":0.32593501364986655,"score_spread":0.30057418811650977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116210297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98441756,0.00022486143,0.00010292662,0.0106363725,0.00033156032,0.00081419514,0.0000049465552,0.000008327437,0.0034592785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961186,0.00003858588,0.00007374819,0.00007850807,0.0002493052,0.00001948991,9.03981e-8,0.000004255531,0.0034174002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993074,0.0000572537,0.00017713946,0.000066037406,0.0002617407,0.00013046361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994882,0.00014672366,0.0001603954,0.0001297725,0.00004543856,0.000029470766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073895743,0.000047851132,0.000072056144,0.000013064489,0.0017406733,0.00007914517,0.00030441544,0.000013791026,0.000012351251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052428117,0.000025115853,0.00007026207,0.00007922867,0.000101904414,0.000051053903,0.00008031097,0.00009878831,6.4903804e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015267849,0.0054414775,0.27696386,0.000043142052,0.00056806265,0.0000037093214,0.10903282,0.0016231408,0.0033318761,0.47598934,0.06085058,0.065999314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018109628,0.00043996697,0.24697098,0.00005872058,0.00025791946,0.000011710758,0.05618409,0.00022874748,0.00027316576,0.025669714,0.6678971,0.00019692296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028123579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001417774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60704654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005834706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029190009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116463512","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2061558","title":"Contributory Qualifying and Non-Qualifying Triggers in the Loss of Control Defence: A Wrong Turn on Sexual Infidelity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Control (management); Social psychology; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0233145791781004,"score_gpt":0.3346505977495845,"score_spread":0.3113360185714841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116463512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99210066,0.0019727424,0.002263172,0.002052241,0.00007206743,0.00028870557,0.000008003147,0.000009446461,0.0012329739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867266,0.0005574313,0.000013403323,0.00029454497,0.00037327397,0.000014819397,8.7063995e-7,0.000007031265,0.00006594976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970427,0.0005271623,0.0003711985,0.00012645153,0.0004289532,0.0015035134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888986,0.0005400792,0.0002574864,0.00013428759,0.000073432944,0.00010486425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010978188,0.000106485386,0.00020388943,0.00007053605,0.00057164364,0.000067564964,0.00029984213,0.00008962262,0.000008781002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035259227,0.0000772975,0.000061946776,0.00023827267,0.00020479727,0.00029006277,0.000019259778,0.0012471218,0.000004848303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011665959,0.00020335172,0.17057991,0.000014087277,0.00008066519,0.0000013268867,0.03630181,0.000065092194,0.00031045702,0.7801262,0.000039536906,0.012160914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011448871,0.0011349124,0.15334123,0.0002079398,0.0003038947,0.00024189896,0.6420779,0.0004130393,0.00018744598,0.14566973,0.043666705,0.0013064146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021688372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043079215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63445646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005014281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011695637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5418193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117125021","doi":"","title":"Report on the Uniform Civil Enforcement of Money Judgments Act","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Enforcement; Payment; Order (exchange); Law; Civil procedure; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.01887631623103462,"score_gpt":0.3007995505602473,"score_spread":0.2819232343292127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117125021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4053266,0.00033851483,0.0013943183,0.037632916,0.00014416434,0.0004441203,0.0000040183522,0.000034315406,0.554681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891928,0.001326273,0.000025163854,0.00022262007,0.00033337958,0.000007702257,0.000001453105,0.0000059179224,0.008884684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982794,0.0000481547,0.00025474586,0.00009177237,0.00043411524,0.00089183974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942875,0.000045539276,0.00022856913,0.00017251732,0.00006298072,0.00006163946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024477455,0.00006574952,0.0000793966,0.00003153784,0.0005806272,0.00003824814,0.0003237767,0.000036102734,0.00029268282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006819558,0.000043313725,0.00008287065,0.00014355338,0.0000729331,0.00011511549,0.000025338262,0.00062118523,0.00003467413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069508405,0.00005487672,0.00038942567,4.536691e-7,0.00003890593,5.849321e-7,0.00062670023,0.00010471953,0.000042821634,0.9904681,0.00042487838,0.007841574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002961546,0.0001540028,0.00047544588,0.00001642991,0.00002822862,0.00004529214,0.004946731,0.000079981175,0.0005957526,0.15490082,0.83833206,0.00012912865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088106375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009931211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83790714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082245807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016657274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5541849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117166695","doi":"","title":"Personal Property Law and Information Assets: Rehabilitation and Relevance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tangible property; Personal property; Intangible property; Relevance (law); Commodification; Statutory law; Property (philosophy); Property law; Law and economics; Business; Real property; Intellectual property; Law; Property rights; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.009333909641101179,"score_gpt":0.25114348461596775,"score_spread":0.24180957497486658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117166695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7246745,0.00580739,0.0028163043,0.10675804,0.00016044409,0.0008022696,0.000010369974,0.000121425386,0.15884924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932942,0.00503554,0.00023293115,0.0002787032,0.000102290316,0.000007375189,8.5915093e-7,0.0000030485694,0.0010450629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990521,0.00005916568,0.00012658893,0.0000705751,0.0001742397,0.0005173003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996695,0.00009008707,0.00006964013,0.00003884051,0.00006925699,0.00006269928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009351782,0.000048521877,0.000053659733,0.000025334304,0.00073216326,0.00013516395,0.00005968315,0.000040182433,0.000023099292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020976018,0.00003551085,0.000018354294,0.00008750356,0.0001578809,0.0013060723,0.000012608437,0.00042526075,0.000015412828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035947298,0.000011396406,0.00040679506,0.0000032400162,0.000006080131,4.8453117e-8,0.0048839496,7.242042e-7,0.000015541524,0.94117945,0.00012260383,0.053366587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031816264,0.00018585849,0.0009906412,0.00001234217,0.000010594528,0.000038650287,0.009163846,0.00053440075,0.000001881946,0.11655984,0.87207264,0.00011112161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055521115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002860526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87195003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025951688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017994228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5631282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117427861","doi":"","title":"Dementia, Decision-Making, and the Modern (Adult) Guardianship Paradigm: Bentley v Maplewood Seniors Care Society","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Dementia; Autonomy; Stewardship (theology); Ideal (ethics); Set (abstract data type); Meaning (existential); Prudence; Psychology; Gerontology; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Disease; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.005512030270301879,"score_gpt":0.2679494544486018,"score_spread":0.2624374241782999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117427861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6358796,0.019456599,0.25939757,0.04060344,0.0005760092,0.0012369681,0.000019672094,0.0001664,0.042663757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940336,0.004183805,0.00043193347,0.0004612065,0.0005601157,0.000015009867,0.0000014660749,0.000015107893,0.0002978075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754924,0.00021824907,0.00023605982,0.00021155388,0.0004364432,0.0013484672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991276,0.0003035109,0.00015253892,0.00020191362,0.0001081269,0.00010625595],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002336633,0.00012549505,0.00015756278,0.000024003637,0.0019623912,0.00026949178,0.00043803273,0.00009153299,0.000024073845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015808472,0.000087705055,0.00021333883,0.00015187076,0.000289888,0.00016633167,0.00006377648,0.0009861118,0.00001704242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017487791,0.000012091901,0.0016498773,0.0000025030565,0.00009897494,1.5300452e-7,0.011967971,0.00004643413,0.0000031916902,0.9223185,0.00028411552,0.06359868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084885204,0.00003390023,0.0005793957,0.000020251819,0.000097302065,0.000018997316,0.017661473,0.0008039456,0.0000020189736,0.93817395,0.041610077,0.00014985715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005857733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011466283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35815397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038326875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009397751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118298246","doi":"10.7202/043635ar","title":"Les rapprochements entre la société de personnes et le partnership : une étude de droit comparé canadien","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.022761012446756174,"score_gpt":0.3008082424085248,"score_spread":0.2780472299617686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118298246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76038325,0.0012738857,0.0024837414,0.03212732,0.00007367804,0.0003385767,0.00006170341,0.000110715075,0.20314711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95224124,0.0003611875,0.0030001139,0.0018870594,0.00068117026,0.000091678456,0.000035251243,0.00004133203,0.041660987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741447,0.0003288177,0.00031648064,0.00044176725,0.00034809872,0.0011503472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853826,0.00035666866,0.0001803827,0.00027558638,0.00006645727,0.0005826522],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010015469,0.00027181904,0.00031297415,0.00006190796,0.0011128974,0.00019756083,0.0006346111,0.00050109875,0.00032243627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011136359,0.00034946392,0.00022973753,0.00044385772,0.0012999736,0.0002466508,0.000062350846,0.0007372335,0.000085918975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015432437,0.00027604145,0.0046925414,0.00005920762,0.00012407638,0.000019700792,0.11012308,0.0006359321,0.0002563858,0.84989923,0.004382567,0.02951583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011355854,0.000046213805,0.010858757,0.00009782474,0.00019778917,0.000032296426,0.08976569,0.003605535,0.0006983486,0.036778893,0.8560936,0.0006895062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091419145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18700626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.851711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038101801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009106435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118854655","doi":"","title":"Simplifying Claims to Traceable Proceeds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Settlor; Trust law; Law and economics; Business; Property law; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Property rights; Economics; Restitution; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08946151875835523,"score_gpt":0.4285776937241007,"score_spread":0.3391161749657455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118854655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3576346,0.00018964983,0.00019322988,0.028728293,0.00012021532,0.0024753986,0.000055007797,0.00029224466,0.6103113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762484,0.00005757277,0.0007079908,0.0006032731,0.00056686124,0.00014951691,0.000009543432,0.000022231276,0.021634609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960118,0.00016981112,0.00035319233,0.00052912976,0.0016268068,0.0013092734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980697,0.0002325056,0.00006559561,0.0004011278,0.00053639995,0.00069466233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027749375,0.00016313736,0.00024174695,0.00030969203,0.0022968054,0.00035388742,0.0008095104,0.00016419779,0.0007460803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004844457,0.00016202958,0.00010986184,0.0026012538,0.00022877911,0.0004653389,0.0001369744,0.00060089235,0.0005302111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062060935,0.00034713774,0.0022635967,0.00002324298,0.00002119676,0.000078898775,0.0037121698,0.00005212593,0.0017221158,0.9331794,0.04755118,0.010986922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040328188,0.00019835838,0.009215604,0.00005755304,0.000007741934,0.0000040081936,0.0053705014,0.00010648549,0.00048420968,0.018344281,0.9654699,0.00033809943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014336911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025867508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019913653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081228116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119769935","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1027","title":"Harm and Fault in Discrimination Law: The Transition from Intentional to Adverse Effect Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Statute; Law; Context (archaeology); Legal doctrine; Employment discrimination; Liability; Harm; Malice; Political science; Jurisdiction; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02107537109339203,"score_gpt":0.3369209354750022,"score_spread":0.31584556438161016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119769935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8950559,0.000028379036,0.039267622,0.029344507,0.00014231777,0.0006358934,0.000027964688,0.000039140472,0.03545831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858737,0.000031345302,0.00013395738,0.00092168746,0.0001242924,0.000105938234,0.000037917765,0.000006530251,0.00005098756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988664,0.00029077282,0.00019045117,0.00020093558,0.0002374428,0.00021400761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931586,0.00043906822,0.000024766403,0.000117316245,0.000038394235,0.00006461549],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008106411,0.00008626006,0.00010607026,0.00003679001,0.00028749707,0.000071621835,0.0001583975,0.000073896634,0.00015564285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016459126,0.000063410924,0.00003214747,0.0002181285,0.011174127,0.0002771233,0.000050487306,0.00015822599,0.000020795833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062891966,0.000051162817,0.00018285784,0.0000032627254,0.0000023286207,0.0000015252465,0.01886182,0.000028911745,0.000111818794,0.97810537,0.000013748935,0.0025743148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044209362,0.0000657726,0.0038081014,0.00007096591,0.000021816248,7.819426e-7,0.012501931,0.00085138954,0.00027929893,0.97652906,0.005279457,0.00014931856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017019433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059294654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10353148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010265154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014578883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119809","doi":"10.1016/0167-4781(90)90155-u","title":"Torts, Rights, and Right-Wing Ideology","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Ideology; Law; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.017556921141853987,"score_gpt":0.2716415333129409,"score_spread":0.2540846121710869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70365375,0.003428972,0.00508673,0.0034378776,0.00032725147,0.0002147243,0.0000015155065,0.00009001237,0.28375918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99267894,0.0013473486,0.00022158546,0.000088863,0.00036407923,0.0000037755322,3.900276e-7,0.0000055257856,0.0052894964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983447,0.00007939872,0.00014120589,0.0001233394,0.00012856661,0.0011827537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996653,0.000026924776,0.00007561583,0.00008160706,0.000043222022,0.00010728161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001117379,0.00006569563,0.000087574226,0.000040619438,0.0009526612,0.000039054485,0.00019876627,0.00006558242,0.00027423343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020812815,0.000052708092,0.00004120531,0.00009514206,0.00016190184,0.00019601289,0.000028031402,0.0006644566,0.000033632645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003669379,0.000016705408,0.0014618202,4.1456144e-7,0.00002033751,0.0000018370515,0.002094764,9.592035e-8,0.00002529309,0.9934619,0.00009588822,0.0028172976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011834589,0.000042391184,0.0012712168,0.0000026328066,0.000014496028,0.000060223443,0.0014313438,0.0000028334587,0.000032680113,0.82985085,0.16709381,0.00007914704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051568327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026325898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2890252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024907678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007552228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99144113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119829461","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttu224","title":"Recent US developments in estate and trust law and taxation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.01759570477433455,"score_gpt":0.2895511487818407,"score_spread":0.27195544400750615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119829461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84744656,0.0000870608,0.000020975815,0.0015500563,0.0000610458,0.00022094365,0.000003069372,0.000039483424,0.15057082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642134,0.0014658875,0.00094809674,0.00039264368,0.000074152835,0.000030800373,0.0000047771573,0.000007793029,0.00065449864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914926,0.000088991226,0.00017139263,0.0002107859,0.0001595411,0.0002200451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960524,0.000068631765,0.00009364454,0.00009387288,0.00003362794,0.000104960534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045235007,0.000085589425,0.000114230774,0.000043977874,0.0003364027,0.00010678965,0.00009117097,0.00006455669,0.00004148927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001025758,0.000081286984,0.000009855109,0.00013846946,0.00018980163,0.00019370356,0.00004707895,0.00008206218,0.00001638547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016659806,0.000058221234,0.09804977,0.000018463576,0.000008502212,0.0000013778248,0.014697547,0.000014229376,0.00008308161,0.52001786,0.00012040688,0.36691388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037441446,0.000013677012,0.2361943,0.000013531297,0.0000058509636,8.401596e-7,0.0007745754,0.0001443585,0.00007161245,0.00328263,0.7589953,0.00012895145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036849913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016444828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75887483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055731663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004598349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91766006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123071053","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0005","title":"Constructive Trusts from a Law and Economics Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Plaintiff; Unjust enrichment; Express trust; Damages; Law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Wrongdoing; Sociology; Political science; Business; Computer science; Restitution","score_opus":0.009137035967406807,"score_gpt":0.23603158689937292,"score_spread":0.22689455093196612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123071053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18006153,0.0003661276,0.00015634624,0.0023770751,0.000061388506,0.00006332056,0.00004491998,0.000010205135,0.81685907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951992,0.0005341082,0.003660926,0.00010111734,0.00023438002,2.356489e-8,4.6611183e-7,0.0000019660513,0.00026781767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965864,0.0000389805,0.00005691383,0.0000877481,0.00006265088,0.0000950758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996071,0.00003950843,0.000088033776,0.000052330197,0.00009710189,0.00011593325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009510636,0.000040777843,0.00008604771,0.000005070509,0.00086076616,0.000035737317,0.00013652892,0.000043012766,0.0007685127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005142453,0.00004773347,0.000044069806,0.000008657792,0.0005459278,0.00056170643,0.00003698033,0.00007627717,0.000004790414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015624248,0.000016570122,0.0001336103,2.231698e-7,0.000029269255,0.0000010383078,0.020053575,0.00000792628,0.000011164826,0.9782759,0.000089506626,0.0013655688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060911576,0.00002441385,0.0016483715,0.0000077487675,0.000039948554,0.0000055947517,0.15519802,0.000060916038,0.000027854221,0.02101607,0.8212576,0.00010435002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42665574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7429038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95725983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052234926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007039566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84146756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123460060","doi":"10.5287/ora-o0ok8rqbx","title":"Compensation claims against trustees","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goldcorp; Nuclear Safety and Security Commission; BC Cancer Agency; Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Damages; Tort; Breach of contract; Law and economics; Law; Subject (documents); Business; Political science; Economics; Liability; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.044287025085250294,"score_gpt":0.3018881921598746,"score_spread":0.2576011670746243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123460060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21579117,0.00006463965,0.0006117971,0.0014310691,0.00016382021,0.0011045942,0.00053142343,0.00013390013,0.7801676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70247406,0.014667296,0.0031593156,0.00002965361,0.00023360582,0.000001095568,0.0026799073,0.00005898194,0.2766961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957262,0.00083066226,0.00022390581,0.00073990296,0.0015703132,0.0009089852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971085,0.00050647964,0.0003781509,0.00063096196,0.0008714764,0.000504401],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010040638,0.00030134473,0.0005181506,0.001141298,0.0039617093,0.000096032185,0.0021691048,0.00046219732,0.0012375215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011262064,0.00042491642,0.00040116266,0.0012133727,0.0013503633,0.0007010919,0.00040295598,0.0012966124,0.00008404655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017950574,0.0012629643,0.0046909014,0.00073196564,0.0006980123,0.00036664182,0.1410389,0.00020694638,0.0014280297,0.70294315,0.055921968,0.08891547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007255001,0.00012317854,0.0066568335,0.00015023169,0.00007133844,4.85836e-7,0.13568586,0.0005408732,0.000018366369,0.0031426311,0.8524978,0.00038687303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007297517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06632513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79657584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006734067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096204237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123524410","doi":"10.1017/s1352325212000249","title":"LEGAL OBLIGATION AND REASONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Action (physics); Legal positivism; Philosophy of law; Positivism; Political science; Legal profession; Legal realism; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Physics","score_opus":0.012615956732833465,"score_gpt":0.28259888142952067,"score_spread":0.2699829246966872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123524410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2706754,0.00013331685,0.0008161091,0.010498268,0.00010090025,0.0003118004,0.000004579046,0.00011738489,0.71734226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781405,0.00003579185,0.00035049606,0.00050205714,0.00022751339,0.000050952545,0.000002594825,0.0000059766285,0.020684144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993835,0.00010940722,0.00008300975,0.00012944391,0.00012688008,0.0001677608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995906,0.00010651784,0.000032587035,0.00012035071,0.00004615879,0.00010381008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039475012,0.000052603827,0.000057298534,0.000022348793,0.00043760787,0.0002238034,0.00011598404,0.00005070086,0.00048810837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104689956,0.0000473885,0.000024967696,0.000119364086,0.00022020716,0.00050754426,0.000034782337,0.00009319967,0.0003215564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014895243,0.000010812541,0.00018172896,0.0000013161464,0.0000030947122,3.0838962e-7,0.00086158625,5.8546505e-7,0.0003024133,0.98470163,0.0015395811,0.012395461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007792077,0.000008828465,0.005256735,0.0000061522655,0.0000060716075,0.0000011398827,0.0015466631,0.000028200257,0.000109600915,0.17867714,0.81419146,0.00009008045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061480193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041376994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8126519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025344942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005753157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92940074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124619597","doi":"10.7202/042695ar","title":"Effectivité et ineffectivité des décisions de justice en matière matrimoniale : un exemple d'ineffectivité totale, le non-paiement de pensions alimentaires","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Law enforcement; Political science; Law; Welfare economics; Business; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.009228106882124675,"score_gpt":0.2928766248989329,"score_spread":0.28364851801680824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124619597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175632,0.00017391327,0.05623805,0.0036537936,0.000076394484,0.0010603686,0.000048223326,0.0002481476,0.02093792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835381,0.0001639772,0.012006511,0.0007851026,0.00043130617,0.0004924261,0.000017204005,0.000056129396,0.0025092792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971614,0.00081899227,0.00028591277,0.00046829064,0.0003450934,0.00092029304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968657,0.0021098652,0.00012852652,0.00041691132,0.0000690869,0.0004099037],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022149268,0.00028689604,0.00033212377,0.00014997424,0.0021170508,0.00019719714,0.00044539614,0.00031566437,0.00009921924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005996706,0.00030935276,0.00022726336,0.00055069034,0.00047165217,0.00041115514,0.00015244819,0.0005890658,0.00009546493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019102432,0.0025874143,0.023371942,0.0004183658,0.00045183967,0.00009654536,0.102408774,0.007956686,0.13170095,0.52703434,0.009089068,0.19469306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007151704,0.0010540204,0.4573649,0.0007608467,0.001986236,0.0002367494,0.02783829,0.01610344,0.12440953,0.17873812,0.18072347,0.003632729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019423407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014105033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43399292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022336573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047824855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125010651","doi":"","title":"Access or Expectation: The Test for Fiduciary Accountability","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Test (biology); Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.03360034008899149,"score_gpt":0.3850971834808357,"score_spread":0.3514968433918442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125010651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8972427,0.0003003145,0.008734658,0.07076374,0.0010080744,0.0013692065,0.000024915797,0.00011011071,0.020446235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949897,0.0003233862,0.00012500443,0.00022947416,0.0015955464,0.000078938305,0.000001352626,0.000008461311,0.0026481561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984197,0.000045961533,0.00016876294,0.00013318026,0.00021672861,0.001015636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881357,0.0006681045,0.00011284099,0.00017616698,0.00016682291,0.00006248528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002534214,0.00006807927,0.00007125803,0.000020438987,0.0018156696,0.0002904563,0.0007291775,0.00006217541,0.00020759259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008839227,0.00004127777,0.000079794634,0.0002070731,0.0001576573,0.00039128252,0.000026152731,0.0010696921,0.0000143899015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041789575,0.00014538245,0.009398461,0.0000033838883,0.000033207114,2.0704542e-7,0.0044710673,0.0000042308243,0.00066439994,0.95477575,0.00144084,0.029021272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039050647,0.00009003764,0.008688445,0.0000032825283,0.000031854208,0.000032516487,0.018637732,0.000043082873,0.0001667184,0.5850706,0.3866738,0.00017143464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080462673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10217337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38523296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002628396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038245772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126560075","doi":"","title":"The Promise of Certainty in the Law of Pre-Incorporation Contracts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Relation (database); Law; Limited liability; Third party; Certainty; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.023439967679636756,"score_gpt":0.30123575604614244,"score_spread":0.2777957883665057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126560075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7571565,0.00016981132,0.00005558071,0.009530538,0.00007115179,0.0009344499,0.000011391031,0.000021279497,0.23204932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863434,0.00007378673,0.000075395605,0.00028464623,0.000104365026,0.00006396879,0.000003133662,0.0000040571913,0.00075628806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998965,0.00020781338,0.00026438406,0.00010701849,0.00028897196,0.00016676853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991159,0.00028203853,0.00018118255,0.00027386186,0.00009852109,0.000048534966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011864329,0.000056548262,0.000100305064,0.000009538007,0.0004132573,0.00006383414,0.00039121514,0.000054940287,0.000039089704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016289341,0.00003444399,0.000048019447,0.00024231253,0.00037346914,0.00017899893,0.000024713347,0.00013432895,0.000014023365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024421714,0.000071296185,0.0015800456,0.0000035202643,0.0000041466956,6.306657e-7,0.0020380262,0.000044669865,0.00038828555,0.9951434,0.00018322475,0.00051829556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059483136,0.000060705504,0.02802561,0.00003650302,0.000018707728,0.0000011099066,0.004167826,0.00012781177,0.0013321248,0.08320886,0.8822945,0.00013142185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033480413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1325597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91193455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003500098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109429384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9729557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127919043","doi":"","title":"ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF CITATION OF AUTHORITY ON THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Deakin Research Online (Deakin University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Citation; Law; Common law; Legal citation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; State (computer science); Certiorari; Precedent; Original jurisdiction; Comparative law; History; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.23178099521127693,"score_gpt":0.3829338067663177,"score_spread":0.1511528115550408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127919043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897765,0.000009323905,0.0002280013,0.0030913816,0.000020365957,0.0003578017,0.00012878617,0.000016969669,0.0063708927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974354,0.00007754699,0.0009916933,0.00000923868,0.00007485176,6.014606e-7,0.000015732154,0.0000067589403,0.0013881715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979209,0.00043682364,0.00020615137,0.00019018761,0.0009857496,0.0002602465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817646,0.00064955314,0.000175184,0.00032056504,0.00056213595,0.0001161245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010022562,0.00005765254,0.00018374847,0.00035847296,0.00034856427,0.000008333178,0.00068724516,0.0000977157,0.00007377755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064207544,0.000065691296,0.00009792922,0.0015829379,0.0009858317,0.00010106459,0.00014692714,0.0002945192,0.000010250968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001108616,0.00040505655,0.002131048,0.000021383326,0.00004311344,0.0000056914696,0.0072424524,0.00006804488,0.002092091,0.9843916,0.0004714571,0.0030171983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017697505,0.00062369806,0.53952533,0.00024339945,0.000072112794,8.160284e-7,0.02373573,0.00042657557,0.006110116,0.010069334,0.41704726,0.00037588086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021483269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036139046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97432226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103664104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007682069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98503274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128352995","doi":"10.1017/s000819730600715x","title":"A RE-APPRAISAL OF THE FIDUCIARY SELF-DEALING AND FAIR-DEALING RULES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Fiduciary; Database transaction; Law and economics; Business; Trust law; Settlor; Property (philosophy); Law; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance; Computer science; Philosophy; Database","score_opus":0.015555272777650881,"score_gpt":0.29165674806820563,"score_spread":0.27610147529055473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128352995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.809256,0.000744141,0.00024472162,0.019470815,0.0003143291,0.00019263769,0.000022810715,0.000046961468,0.16970755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801075,0.00010739467,0.00040646913,0.00023083223,0.0009817613,0.0000035015064,7.849113e-7,0.000008793347,0.0002497294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998888,0.00020713432,0.00025509033,0.00009810585,0.00031852987,0.00023310848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992199,0.00025555608,0.00021096817,0.00017507069,0.000077944,0.000060546976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012450485,0.00007622087,0.00011038195,0.000014364483,0.0021609936,0.00015300186,0.0003914237,0.000047358346,0.000011285749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004583055,0.000044267486,0.00009073004,0.00013546852,0.00033763354,0.00012512093,0.000089120185,0.00029072133,0.000004609237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005177409,0.000031506686,0.0015495331,0.0000062943104,0.000017810049,0.0000017186676,0.002037446,0.000083513565,0.0003430495,0.9921691,0.0031766351,0.0005782079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006984336,0.00003427609,0.039465442,0.00013380007,0.00016354318,0.00010091202,0.011327761,0.00067800406,0.0013122287,0.022062542,0.9236762,0.00034688637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009930403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038247898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97010654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003864216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009840675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133624854","doi":"","title":"Clarifying the Role of Precedent and the Doctrine of Stare Decisis in Trial and Intermediate Appellate Level Charter Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Doctrine; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03883818339344456,"score_gpt":0.33207330233573684,"score_spread":0.29323511894229226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133624854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989644,0.005180134,0.000035764995,0.0040739872,0.00005644101,0.00031552595,0.000008923615,0.0000017135278,0.0006834946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955226,0.0041957884,0.0000615141,0.00003530814,0.000101633144,0.000011036458,1.8227631e-7,0.0000030455744,0.000068895795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873364,0.00017955438,0.0005645111,0.000084050174,0.0003086579,0.00012960704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985872,0.0005173327,0.00050965423,0.00010008965,0.0002461466,0.000039591978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013972201,0.000077508754,0.0004177659,0.00010479883,0.0002048836,0.00006391921,0.0002172522,0.00003371626,0.00001385011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026372794,0.00003813536,0.00012545573,0.0003476285,0.0005783536,0.00018412062,0.00014191304,0.00018910634,4.7011812e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00905258,0.0006718514,0.2218487,0.0001447042,0.010268559,0.000009757632,0.5227669,0.00063720613,0.0014118919,0.07601693,0.001181473,0.15598944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.040265985,0.00079732965,0.5486514,0.00032632478,0.0031873004,0.000012212032,0.3230047,0.0010383409,0.001116074,0.029278236,0.051773712,0.00054837164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033748916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052584414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32680273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023593382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039164228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5101849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137015572","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000158","title":"COHABITANTS IN PRIVATE LAW: TRUST, FRUSTRATION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN ENGLAND, GERMANY AND CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Appeal; Law; Political science; Autonomy; Legislature; German; Common law; Private law; Comparative law; Geography","score_opus":0.021783605680763075,"score_gpt":0.28599774731631056,"score_spread":0.26421414163554746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137015572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97197074,0.000053280306,0.000012782409,0.0032067646,0.000054413307,0.00022560351,0.000015445732,0.000005846491,0.024455111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992026,0.000020516713,0.00004903688,0.00029334836,0.000053241798,0.000059669714,0.000007205166,0.0000017272274,0.00031264132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993399,0.000053000178,0.00017146868,0.00016008437,0.00015553462,0.00012003926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997341,0.00007039494,0.000045777466,0.00003935322,0.00004374607,0.00006662731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000099678226,0.000072525785,0.000101515834,0.000024585286,0.00012518301,0.00013156126,0.000074995805,0.000028747858,0.000043748652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001845195,0.00006667436,0.00000615392,0.000045591605,0.00013895988,0.00036094326,0.000013642218,0.000082657294,0.0000036858278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008053572,0.00003577607,0.035752002,0.0000025841848,0.0000075021735,0.000002106964,0.009245947,0.0000020431598,0.00013730343,0.9536165,0.000050595325,0.0011395584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012015669,0.00010598463,0.78608686,0.00003363693,0.0000043380965,0.0000033237293,0.0067980415,0.001500836,0.000044367778,0.054478284,0.14950843,0.0002343326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7739384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97255814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007751403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043773874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27189013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137437015","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12087","title":"Tort Law for Cynics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Idealism; Damages; Cynicism; Context (archaeology); Law; Duty of care; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Liability","score_opus":0.05530293285794409,"score_gpt":0.372401103392749,"score_spread":0.31709817053480494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137437015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014876283,0.023312872,0.029984944,0.022675592,0.00014050526,0.0014753396,0.000021189855,0.00013769823,0.9221031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93557817,0.01598146,0.004110228,0.03681802,0.0007991368,0.00060090027,0.000025135263,0.000030395968,0.0060565732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993917,0.000047734877,0.0001388032,0.00013552429,0.00012583012,0.0001604567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995459,0.00006386613,0.00004691313,0.0002141519,0.000056934823,0.000072284936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061740907,0.000053191998,0.00014320348,0.0000023612008,0.00040283968,0.000036584624,0.00020185311,0.000033428954,0.000054851473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048983144,0.000045539666,0.00009001094,0.00005001763,0.00009266495,0.00007915824,0.000024118644,0.000039853297,0.000095360534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.3646015e-7,0.000010109271,0.0000015837761,0.00015745868,0.0000020878713,2.0992614e-8,0.00008849373,6.895399e-7,0.000005919072,0.9854992,0.0018331831,0.012400987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003837711,0.0000057107122,0.0000021894364,0.00013731937,0.000019070967,1.01382405e-7,0.0000021736519,0.00013702655,0.000007899915,0.061778184,0.9378097,0.00006222146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012255744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036129537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93597656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024989804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028151362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30983576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138582686","doi":"","title":"Report on Creditor Access to the Assets of a Purpose Trust","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Creditor; Legislation; Fiduciary; Blind trust; Business; Work (physics); Political science; Debt; Duty; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.024477817227177703,"score_gpt":0.34915818706298285,"score_spread":0.32468036983580517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138582686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7673403,0.0006010728,0.008573558,0.052151475,0.0018510098,0.0010245709,0.000009279933,0.00005425279,0.16839448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461657,0.00032114176,0.000036545098,0.0001856904,0.000982085,0.000016720525,5.1885615e-7,0.000007334389,0.0038333868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824095,0.00013006617,0.00021818446,0.00012175537,0.0003961369,0.0008929333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993609,0.000062819134,0.00016662695,0.00020241295,0.00011096802,0.00009623501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029817738,0.00006333562,0.00009152845,0.000041283165,0.0005895318,0.00011650974,0.0005098464,0.00004330106,0.000055107397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004994983,0.000042880314,0.00007778251,0.00031292226,0.000054658576,0.00013954335,0.000023505823,0.00066090183,0.000027469441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010121923,0.00006824323,0.0026471517,7.674454e-7,0.000027638682,0.0000032739665,0.00048351075,0.000045474935,0.00006022941,0.9886134,0.0040301285,0.004010014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000122068865,0.0000957139,0.0027162046,0.0000070279025,0.000015106557,0.000073031355,0.0016792894,0.0000020327736,0.00022393095,0.07822737,0.9167575,0.000080704245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004400094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006015001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003941128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027280233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48393965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139608255","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103622","title":"Jurisdiction and Scale: Legal `Technicalities' as Resources for Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Law; Temporality; Sociology; Political science; Jurisprudence; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Business","score_opus":0.029557900311957395,"score_gpt":0.3803226695723262,"score_spread":0.3507647692603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139608255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5171079,0.004513272,0.00053291605,0.09148419,0.00035510762,0.0013300249,0.000058279642,0.00058974477,0.38402855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98677784,0.00041475508,0.00016365664,0.0009631861,0.0014036633,0.000094709605,0.000002001817,0.000008590861,0.010171611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988917,0.000110752335,0.00019300728,0.00024043868,0.0002480062,0.0003160782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994118,0.00021862212,0.00008080641,0.00007932663,0.00013924389,0.000070178496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077438593,0.00011699139,0.0002130635,0.00003082285,0.0029524094,0.00015929001,0.00014639433,0.000110786495,0.000013194153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024588808,0.000106654734,0.00010363229,0.00017459171,0.00070984184,0.00024729763,0.00005320427,0.00013719515,0.000009162767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003552629,0.000035514928,0.000046662808,0.0000065941717,0.000033549433,4.88753e-7,0.024165878,2.3370808e-7,0.000062249695,0.9521249,0.006226137,0.017262286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018259307,0.00006821156,0.0025203591,0.000008276157,0.000042165782,5.273037e-7,0.024734695,9.926994e-7,0.00003420602,0.122771695,0.84950334,0.00013292908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009698145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009980858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098366996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007007678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139635052","doi":"","title":"L'Administration des biens d'autrui dans le code civil du Québec","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista Catalana de Dret Privat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020097637627650954,"score_gpt":0.27157841858922194,"score_spread":0.251480780961571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139635052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89225584,0.0044227797,0.013425344,0.06472618,0.00018272318,0.00057546963,0.0003343799,0.00016479811,0.023912495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98971266,0.0012537786,0.0009688716,0.00036284793,0.0005854538,0.00004813253,0.00013569841,0.00003708814,0.0068954714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979727,0.00015738161,0.00044771118,0.00045892948,0.00033100753,0.0006322605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863774,0.000105867344,0.00021913483,0.0005504116,0.000109397944,0.00037743407],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063820824,0.00025222686,0.0002832002,0.000043508746,0.0012058534,0.00039982478,0.00062983984,0.00020325895,0.00022094266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024907428,0.0002783181,0.00018410855,0.0006210447,0.0014165412,0.00046894525,0.0001252542,0.000265053,0.00039582534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009166767,0.00031828124,0.012171141,0.0001834017,0.000042188414,0.000037347578,0.015066843,0.000053660395,0.0021134599,0.96474993,0.0019768146,0.003277737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042462803,0.00008526643,0.011408705,0.00021508436,0.000100268044,0.00006392346,0.0028427537,0.000088676104,0.0028030765,0.005910361,0.97561157,0.00044570048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11966121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2791447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015116375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003672565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141750530","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020090502.003","title":"Is the Law of Contract Seriously Defective if the Court is Unable to Award Restitutionary Damages for Breach of Contract","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Restitution; Breach of contract; Law; Tort; Punitive damages; Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.037363912579704874,"score_gpt":0.39452742976806865,"score_spread":0.35716351718836375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141750530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83984405,0.0007080521,0.00021238999,0.128872,0.000047447942,0.0018479258,0.0002556929,0.000053052023,0.02815938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686795,0.00020952472,0.0003945503,0.0018061879,0.000046377496,0.00009272071,0.000035941488,0.0000049078553,0.0005418195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897903,0.00015355299,0.00030068128,0.00014579638,0.00023276737,0.0001881618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746317,0.0005733598,0.000257929,0.0006991983,0.00095673697,0.000049614024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008839972,0.00009820822,0.0001633341,0.000012485455,0.0019380552,0.00019723637,0.0009416743,0.00008355918,0.000021646038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026020448,0.000058529236,0.00013092879,0.00023701211,0.0011558245,0.00046810159,0.000075978554,0.00016862154,0.000007662675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088362896,0.00014321019,0.00129151,0.000011658725,0.00004487414,6.519765e-8,0.03457098,0.00019643309,0.005990262,0.949353,0.005459217,0.0028504622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063076033,0.0001565377,0.19509545,0.00007515201,0.000081612496,0.0000024683907,0.007878287,0.0003293485,0.008388729,0.024282008,0.7628581,0.00022156727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01054359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013752476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92507094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009152981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001085043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142164072","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720120806.8219","title":"Safeguard by Rule of Law for the Fiduciary Construction of Chinese Capital Market","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Legislation; Business; Private law; Enforcement; Public law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.011766939626350729,"score_gpt":0.2900237269891253,"score_spread":0.2782567873627746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142164072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42381185,0.00022041166,0.00011649467,0.004091663,0.0005209271,0.00049101154,0.0004863698,0.000011980511,0.5702493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990581,0.0000070171764,0.00018700663,0.00015662132,0.0002553409,0.0000183805,0.0000021343294,0.000002873384,0.000312472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992022,0.000026659243,0.00011594493,0.00009240432,0.00022778047,0.00033504405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993967,0.00010510159,0.00008194113,0.000090152294,0.00012450604,0.00020162344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009530077,0.000044353903,0.00007749305,0.00002834379,0.0013755807,0.000026669888,0.00036151375,0.00004374645,0.000121766134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013678544,0.000035335208,0.000048731457,0.0004037613,0.0025428368,0.00025879042,0.00001916835,0.000044847482,0.0000023210903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020146465,0.000011241965,0.0124093145,0.000004155365,0.000004037172,1.8856719e-8,0.010808622,9.679804e-8,0.000899758,0.9690928,0.0031099606,0.0036580143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021537709,0.00001857579,0.06037794,0.000006624692,0.000025499283,8.03236e-7,0.02470618,0.000025249137,0.0011098203,0.017329756,0.8959466,0.00023754989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12591393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057910662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95176303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016259689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000628292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142961284","doi":"10.1093/indlaw/dwl040","title":"The Spectre of Addis in Contracts of Employment in Canada and the UK","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Notice; Jurisdiction; Remedial education; Political science; Law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.03219902094617423,"score_gpt":0.2880236233753925,"score_spread":0.2558246024292183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142961284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706534,0.00015791784,0.0000023569496,0.006422644,0.0001430219,0.0001803378,0.000007238672,6.257805e-7,0.022432432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960893,0.00007700227,0.0000049103055,0.0000465372,0.00021492268,0.0000012936803,1.2027347e-7,0.0000013973574,0.000044871173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991575,0.00010855632,0.00030937145,0.00003768174,0.0002344054,0.00015252168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910706,0.00058880734,0.000166661,0.00005388618,0.000032687807,0.00005091741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021549175,0.000031441356,0.0000967596,0.000013376988,0.00023791194,0.00002503522,0.00015697668,0.000036085938,0.000028684142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018006073,0.000017456521,0.000019511308,0.00013693132,0.0002426714,0.00003247337,0.00001682297,0.00028080845,1.034601e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028900313,0.0000356091,0.06829101,6.0023507e-7,0.000019571866,0.00001309382,0.0027020855,0.000054901633,0.00005099775,0.9037863,0.0008240972,0.023932718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011179634,0.00008480784,0.2080739,0.00016456752,0.000035974917,0.000017951237,0.036089383,0.000022777023,0.0019480555,0.022194298,0.7199615,0.00022711046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98465365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99930644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88159204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018026948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000732342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18298504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144119811","doi":"","title":"A Modern Trustee Act for British Columbia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Trust law; Statutory law; Voting trust; Property (philosophy); Law; Business; Companies Act; Testamentary trust; Law and economics; Political science; Corporate law; Economics; Finance; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.011821894170871533,"score_gpt":0.28081289495475736,"score_spread":0.2689910007838858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144119811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87043285,0.0020442065,0.0878785,0.010205939,0.00028620887,0.00092837866,0.000027554766,0.00014158821,0.02805477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986137,0.0014180075,0.00033302294,0.00013741734,0.000563115,0.0000303119,0.0000020623986,0.000013485891,0.011365612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997998,0.000027159342,0.00015010744,0.00013323009,0.00020126779,0.0014902339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999623,0.000027267582,0.000079722246,0.0000791659,0.0000872248,0.000103596314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010321118,0.000047071062,0.000092672395,0.000013930505,0.0012909047,0.0005101505,0.00027947314,0.00006506217,0.00005343195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007386505,0.000069608635,0.000115045965,0.00012185521,0.00007107912,0.00019808424,0.000014462293,0.0005555758,0.000013534087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001046277,0.00012570067,0.0008751727,0.0000033717167,0.000066783105,0.0000018414012,0.0015444951,0.00012431285,0.00009635363,0.8765693,0.0008234873,0.11975873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063927757,0.00007484774,0.00041243093,0.000009179349,0.000016426686,0.000057902747,0.0016761034,0.0000203902,0.0000036234674,0.88869226,0.10829422,0.000103308965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03861627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74311596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7044997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010734483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041988827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145464516","doi":"","title":"Report on Exculpation Clauses in Trust Instruments","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Legislature; Duty; Liability; Business; Property (philosophy); Law; Trust law; Law and economics; Statement (logic); Political science; Accounting; Economics","score_opus":0.025023891490360196,"score_gpt":0.3045577290244221,"score_spread":0.27953383753406186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145464516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9177786,0.00015455442,0.00016012357,0.0054252055,0.00011709987,0.00013197033,6.574111e-7,0.000024900604,0.07620686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898909,0.0021867428,0.000021301556,0.000109017376,0.00026057524,0.000008606033,0.0000013119266,0.0000063832513,0.007515169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837697,0.000068310255,0.0002142472,0.00012420304,0.00028536018,0.0009309282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966896,0.000018015617,0.000120281475,0.00010122371,0.000032984117,0.00005853405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010751219,0.00005993811,0.00007149406,0.0000760324,0.0003884205,0.00006303899,0.00016523979,0.00005403066,0.0001603163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102003556,0.00005568882,0.00004200229,0.00023578289,0.000043249544,0.00019523919,0.00001068831,0.0007235846,0.00009546873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072886764,0.00016023763,0.033955403,7.604764e-7,0.000016563725,0.000008731358,0.0012023243,0.00002550711,0.000028556107,0.9031017,0.0002531144,0.061239816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001439563,0.00033465138,0.038510997,0.000046571156,0.00002473991,0.00026823868,0.008625467,0.00032682234,0.00009821407,0.46111292,0.48875833,0.00045347694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079041894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00902381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4885052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001047255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044220203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50354975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146069499","doi":"","title":"Consumer guarantees - lessons to be learnt from afar","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer protection; Legislation; Confusion; Consumer law; Business; Consumer Bill of Rights; Consumer Advocacy; Complement (music); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.28760126219012705,"score_gpt":0.4183035686116017,"score_spread":0.13070230642147462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146069499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98055845,0.0000984214,0.000055176082,0.013066719,0.00006977215,0.00034500423,0.00005929977,0.000032062624,0.0057150885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516812,0.000070129485,0.0005121024,0.000020912106,0.00009797678,0.0000017442826,0.0000069534008,0.0000058393725,0.04760312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983945,0.00028341787,0.00010244825,0.00028761002,0.0006079055,0.0003241128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988771,0.00010705338,0.000055888973,0.00023039228,0.00031302424,0.00041655934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006515223,0.000076164746,0.00015487445,0.00008245508,0.00083353976,0.00010219363,0.00039358085,0.00011110394,0.00005516161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047508584,0.00008129761,0.000046168505,0.00022950643,0.0007992529,0.00021953719,0.00023525835,0.00022977304,0.00006783913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075340323,0.00096761336,0.38171616,0.00021095393,0.00043962413,0.00042965665,0.26889658,0.00006870396,0.07263689,0.122615635,0.14330497,0.007959796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061325356,0.00017566296,0.08301057,0.000089041314,0.000034520453,0.0000035601563,0.09854125,0.000024870356,0.005058143,0.00068168406,0.81151223,0.00025518815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072239585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020530175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6682073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007919051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022153571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93393844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147481398","doi":"","title":"Let's Not Get Psyched Out of Privacy: Reflections on Withdrawing Consent to the Collection, Use and Disclosure of Personal Information","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Informed consent; Personally identifiable information; Subject (documents); Law; Internet privacy; Psychology; Private information retrieval; Business; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.16126157418468512,"score_gpt":0.3697866053060109,"score_spread":0.20852503112132575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147481398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99310833,0.0000037553832,0.0009798899,0.0036784906,0.00010249639,0.00040379848,0.00005650264,0.000035396915,0.0016313256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972464,0.000022997312,0.000071802824,0.0002111891,0.00006230481,0.0000025448242,0.000009250774,0.0000065757604,0.0023669645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989266,0.00017151295,0.0002150954,0.00016850932,0.00033923186,0.00017908606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991059,0.00016306437,0.00020045137,0.000205071,0.00023575779,0.00008977157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033305775,0.0001079002,0.00014074316,0.00021150743,0.00069540495,0.00018407569,0.00025925098,0.000084815256,0.0000064380356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009695567,0.00009844053,0.00006304028,0.0005284791,0.00020907368,0.0011240838,0.000093906434,0.0001888735,0.0000145963095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014566092,0.00011012761,0.9688852,0.000026661388,0.000037561735,0.0000013538804,0.02212327,0.00013310625,0.0013452241,0.0069638384,0.000023426215,0.00020457618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044744625,0.00009607834,0.9181144,0.00006871745,0.00004759446,0.0000015175142,0.003697963,7.718084e-7,0.0011025667,0.000078263445,0.0761999,0.0001447814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047838513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03544383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07617647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012987679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017022532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147835783","doi":"10.18357/tar32201211644","title":"Fiduciary Relationship as Contemporary Colonialism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Arbutus Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Fiduciary; Sovereignty; Law; Constitution; Colonialism; Supreme court; Political science; Discretion; Human rights; Sociology; Politics; Duty","score_opus":0.13656718204548263,"score_gpt":0.41393234544766344,"score_spread":0.2773651634021808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147835783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068074106,0.26138473,0.000025787982,0.08919028,0.00025040857,0.0010052399,0.00000766975,0.00009505259,0.64123344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96253884,0.02298336,0.00005827195,0.0074255737,0.00052180694,0.0001116914,0.0000069043563,0.0000073481237,0.0063461782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989619,0.00036193558,0.00018570303,0.000083201434,0.00019336505,0.00021385466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992213,0.00023204877,0.00009872864,0.00029751673,0.000039065875,0.00011133466],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001866991,0.000062502106,0.00012426585,0.000009369488,0.00072300556,0.000027020445,0.0002956058,0.000038003465,0.00040880727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047523214,0.00004151166,0.000075707365,0.0002605704,0.00014367068,0.00020081467,0.00005030211,0.0001385118,0.0021543715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011724981,0.00003260048,0.0025726608,0.0000668848,0.00000777412,3.2498846e-7,0.002585137,1.3423978e-7,0.000002720009,0.9258684,0.06530712,0.003555059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030637093,0.0000031405223,0.0064025437,0.00015050128,0.000023563302,0.0000015683954,0.0001386711,4.576761e-7,0.0000022204854,0.005051925,0.9881314,0.000063354935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001604058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057062112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95573145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040988216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016711681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147906309","doi":"10.7202/1019049ar","title":"Le fiduciaire, véritable pivot ou simple rouage de l’opération de fiducie ?","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026763090328592566,"score_gpt":0.2897585710114977,"score_spread":0.2629954806829051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147906309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027237797,0.0014942028,0.0038601262,0.05811527,0.0007471925,0.00041824792,0.000097102864,0.000074356896,0.9079557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97291476,0.00044220308,0.0032356316,0.0015082664,0.0014226502,0.000040383875,0.000007651735,0.000029403715,0.020399066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976823,0.00030628158,0.0004385856,0.0002545679,0.00037221398,0.000946073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862397,0.00011384387,0.00024377258,0.00023923608,0.00024251456,0.0005366918],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011595916,0.00018270082,0.00020837272,0.000038443635,0.008286375,0.00051532546,0.00046583774,0.00021533639,0.0021247035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103876206,0.0001934938,0.00018516468,0.00034166643,0.00030447045,0.0013436507,0.00008557396,0.0005805663,0.00075844914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026324878,0.000202128,0.00015601901,0.000013670874,0.000027299322,0.000009206569,0.00063650595,0.00045553173,0.00040727016,0.9724374,0.011568776,0.014083562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002943796,0.000051160467,0.0006735221,0.00003313991,0.000034737088,0.00008389368,0.0011953,0.0012545871,0.00078268285,0.059366517,0.9360021,0.00022801256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09673927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049150422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046841873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023794355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148472277","doi":"10.1017/s0008197303266307","title":"<scp>VICARIOUS LIABILITY IN ENGLAND AND AUSTRALIA</scp>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Tort; Vicarious liability; Law; Commit; Liability; Political science","score_opus":0.03216145893755584,"score_gpt":0.30629682825174726,"score_spread":0.2741353693141914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148472277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8793205,0.00014838115,0.000032687833,0.0017912106,0.000107350155,0.0001299249,0.0000045221523,0.000011337141,0.118454106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682623,0.00012654613,0.00008382047,0.00020486974,0.00021921308,0.000005770156,3.306892e-7,0.0000046954465,0.002528533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989265,0.00030763884,0.00017801298,0.00011135779,0.00019390015,0.00028259086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993332,0.00026415233,0.000068614754,0.00013890093,0.00004648086,0.00014865678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017691711,0.00006907093,0.00009981281,0.000016394615,0.0009046585,0.0001942208,0.00019405295,0.000055688644,0.000019966856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024060298,0.00004812219,0.000039608873,0.00015448932,0.0003320587,0.00012793498,0.000023708151,0.00037595,0.00002070285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016582366,0.00004517053,0.028250596,0.0000028508373,0.000008100822,0.000008720479,0.005825443,0.000016425342,0.00006663339,0.9640961,0.0012058388,0.0004724259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002844837,0.000012957106,0.04636838,0.000005582446,0.000009253669,0.000034953347,0.001059038,0.000005616496,0.00006723159,0.00547265,0.94664776,0.000032089498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005414701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012888152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95862347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070911294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006824177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81854445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148520867","doi":"10.1017/s084182090000518x","title":"The Limits of Judicial Fidelity to Law: The Coxford Lecture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Fidelity; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06233093076396494,"score_gpt":0.32410361598211973,"score_spread":0.2617726852181548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148520867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3447887,0.0028807009,0.0011914647,0.082360335,0.0017282659,0.0008973164,0.00008781908,0.000018901645,0.5660465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732286,0.00006718182,0.0001701207,0.0019586866,0.00032201243,0.0000037369712,1.2220606e-7,0.00000530212,0.00014999867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989003,0.000114851944,0.00030952817,0.000083520266,0.00028472877,0.0003070996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854857,0.00017008376,0.00021110829,0.00022504272,0.00036616047,0.00047905487],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010859581,0.0000688282,0.000119611665,0.000022305194,0.0014169327,0.00009932895,0.0010117206,0.000058491307,0.000091697155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000234353,0.000041526593,0.00009186203,0.0002250656,0.0007776904,0.00014677166,0.000018241302,0.0002533907,0.000013042658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009275633,0.000006586131,0.000443815,0.0000015014108,0.000012768151,0.0000069193093,0.010085604,0.000012273555,0.000057083507,0.98422515,0.0028647853,0.0022742506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000521895,0.00005635642,0.0050006504,0.000028851033,0.000019966188,0.0000064982137,0.00076346117,0.0000015558269,0.0006279239,0.028840901,0.96453285,0.00006877634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27112478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88251954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009827692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001401733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151748216","doi":"","title":"The Flight to the Fiduciary Haven","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Duty; Context (archaeology); Tort; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Liability; Geography","score_opus":0.023605338496873414,"score_gpt":0.28536046740194204,"score_spread":0.26175512890506863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151748216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11047179,0.005978994,0.0068832734,0.30543727,0.001162835,0.0010237666,0.000005176486,0.000118732016,0.56891817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774341,0.0022444634,0.000034249202,0.0004577138,0.0007735502,0.000017171647,1.760345e-7,0.0000069141784,0.019031677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981909,0.000120532866,0.00012321763,0.00008668617,0.00023183892,0.0012468486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956,0.000063720625,0.00005952831,0.00017933235,0.00005431385,0.00008311165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028432847,0.000053841206,0.000045955057,0.000015141754,0.002717128,0.00011451974,0.0008046396,0.000030702085,0.000059974293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086358355,0.000027554133,0.00006533516,0.00018208858,0.00009066113,0.00008892715,0.000048575235,0.0007572916,0.0002467045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051302795,0.000011592742,0.00014660516,8.69976e-8,0.000018571704,2.3579616e-7,0.004986575,0.0000011370997,0.000008839333,0.97197425,0.0022328282,0.02061412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038474,0.000029112869,0.0008498277,0.0000015448983,0.0000081222,0.000009357103,0.009652255,0.0000026678,0.000025301948,0.24786563,0.74147046,0.000047235277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015066618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05495032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8669623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030424693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014745245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151790217","doi":"10.1093/pa/gss001","title":"The Problem of the 'Lame Duck' Government: A Critique of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parliamentary Affairs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Term (time); Law; Sociology; Political science; Economic history; Classics; Philosophy; Art; History; Physics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013543596393313003,"score_gpt":0.28047263661647676,"score_spread":0.26692904022316377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151790217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8649888,0.0006012187,0.000031030515,0.022599915,0.00062064634,0.0019025822,0.00017139498,0.00003433445,0.1090501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758315,0.00019475646,0.00013122315,0.00024714656,0.00016890423,0.00011703325,0.0000013542524,0.000012021356,0.0015444012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803346,0.00029241084,0.00033837525,0.000150402,0.0007763314,0.00040899604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880517,0.00022452342,0.00031699947,0.00052712404,0.000036572408,0.000089641966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078923034,0.00012528426,0.0001412897,0.000006785673,0.0008675512,0.00004316783,0.0009823752,0.00005670641,0.00014148487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043377528,0.00006447721,0.00019279822,0.00025050124,0.00064814783,0.0002354354,0.0002939227,0.00017882093,0.000012915457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062879575,0.0010861524,0.6786683,0.00010292467,0.00031102926,3.666957e-7,0.053690985,0.000033456043,0.0065689567,0.22480467,0.01809008,0.016580183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007893463,0.00007289782,0.20239384,0.0002585819,0.00023117226,0.000002657437,0.13537118,0.000021278493,0.0328251,0.0056919516,0.621897,0.00044498974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029812085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031462254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6038069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020520846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010838825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66725904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152559745","doi":"10.1017/s0008197303326212","title":"Exemplary Damages—Two Commonwealth Cases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Damages; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04775190898519161,"score_gpt":0.34829330561716054,"score_spread":0.30054139663196894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152559745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093288,0.0009959921,0.00032707825,0.024089225,0.00035396803,0.00023635713,0.00002248639,0.00005721554,0.88062966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943626,0.00021117584,0.00017718256,0.002423997,0.00047760853,0.0000061711216,0.0000011992954,0.000009939633,0.0023301614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862933,0.00046703315,0.00018251476,0.00009422613,0.00028952828,0.00033738048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991427,0.00023515645,0.0001126188,0.0002281593,0.00007547804,0.00020589402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014550998,0.000079161066,0.00011854794,0.0000158306,0.0037358422,0.00024170079,0.00038757443,0.000032417953,0.00016529544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006628848,0.000054263663,0.00010752857,0.00016079926,0.0003422572,0.00018928725,0.00003144012,0.0003821073,0.000109067165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002966913,0.000027503684,0.00015406759,0.0000010768007,0.000037108384,0.000028297995,0.00057636574,0.000012202996,0.000024968898,0.9839035,0.014939432,0.00029248936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018837271,0.000018315131,0.0003667528,0.0000045566157,0.000091365655,0.00035840555,0.002150237,0.0000046539826,0.000086716995,0.002723054,0.9939114,0.000096161835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065996293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005733663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007613726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017176133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99767095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153128566","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Contracts, 2nd Edition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rescission; Law; Supreme court; Restitution; Confusion; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Unjust enrichment; Business; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.010386846431715687,"score_gpt":0.29278478174928696,"score_spread":0.2823979353175713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153128566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5606546,0.0029359849,0.080628,0.29249847,0.0044710115,0.00083697075,0.000008213082,0.00021097713,0.05775579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750433,0.00077364506,0.00011081066,0.00022541032,0.019813577,0.000009470989,0.0000024709784,0.0000067509663,0.004014592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980137,0.000071222086,0.00012315398,0.000083057326,0.00022119007,0.0014877268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957925,0.00002191028,0.000064752225,0.000078205456,0.00007665902,0.00017919975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022560304,0.00005243965,0.000060648024,0.00004555248,0.0006538966,0.000066481654,0.00012999767,0.00004533654,0.00019804646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013920991,0.000048961887,0.000040626812,0.00018281657,0.00003388557,0.00045230638,0.000011821312,0.0006143214,0.00027261567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062057143,0.000044171262,0.00030797144,3.0423953e-7,0.000012265085,4.385388e-8,0.0010247455,0.0000051471616,0.0004685474,0.97682697,0.0060935104,0.015210126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009165945,0.00003469038,0.0011853405,0.0000015736151,0.000011458787,0.000020097928,0.003648401,0.0000011418375,0.00009221954,0.0607282,0.93411225,0.00007293715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040129593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002297149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92801875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008851318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067282503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.502931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153155984","doi":"10.1017/s1744552312000249","title":"The vulnerable subject of negligence law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Subject (documents); Jurisprudence; Relevance (law); Law; Criticism; Duty; Autonomy; Duty of care; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Damages; Common law; Law and economics; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.04358637366607834,"score_gpt":0.37210867690184324,"score_spread":0.3285223032357649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153155984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26493943,0.0030650897,0.0005896404,0.01664124,0.0027382488,0.00017882498,0.000013646718,0.000009017882,0.7118249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981884,0.00023343031,0.000103020066,0.00041605183,0.0004860013,0.0000026275054,2.3828723e-7,0.000002952048,0.0005673262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893737,0.00014595286,0.00032563426,0.000036947575,0.00041521265,0.00013888719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986856,0.000588475,0.0002485632,0.00006633555,0.00035401777,0.000056990597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017385676,0.000038509235,0.00008076854,0.000022324271,0.00023238298,0.000056692297,0.00054409564,0.000029159564,0.0000614023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021280686,0.000027126056,0.00006734252,0.00006457076,0.00025336788,0.0003680159,0.00003377979,0.000200612,0.000010587132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018180737,0.000050782473,0.0017791131,5.477192e-7,0.000019204146,0.0000013410238,0.003782864,0.000016802678,0.0002478839,0.98906535,0.0002202171,0.004797743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019312605,0.000014793549,0.00081687846,0.000033086362,0.000004058018,0.0000066844095,0.0024914986,0.000009614872,0.0017087215,0.011646531,0.98303396,0.000041075837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006544245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012683831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008737481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089167545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157076830","doi":"10.7202/1000622ar","title":"Democratizing Common Law Constitutionalism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Constitutionalism; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Judicial review; Common law; Public law; Democracy; Administrative law; Sources of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09037132734554755,"score_gpt":0.3211790912281851,"score_spread":0.23080776388263757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157076830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028366765,0.00004125567,0.00020053273,0.0013727946,0.00023336556,0.00006905789,0.00001723151,0.000039535043,0.99518955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672794,0.000030717176,0.0018443054,0.0009063011,0.00026292456,0.000004207986,0.0000011644485,0.000004922753,0.00021753025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992026,0.00008566383,0.00018307516,0.00008620313,0.00022613305,0.00021628648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951506,0.000037776535,0.000088277186,0.00009003661,0.00009110762,0.0001777349],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046470252,0.000059463495,0.00008436491,0.000014876048,0.008293311,0.00007370655,0.00022310826,0.000053728545,0.00064578216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013343354,0.000053024083,0.000063833206,0.000080292346,0.00048504845,0.00030418095,0.000033269804,0.00021670676,0.00012842231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023169998,0.000029762186,0.00012682095,6.7794406e-7,0.000008318594,0.000011305878,0.00047612542,0.0000019572312,0.00002126555,0.99851483,0.00018433678,0.00062227313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108478234,0.000008461529,0.00014702733,0.000009434079,0.000009545558,0.00004197934,0.0004328575,0.000004393349,0.00023888619,0.092957266,0.90596586,0.00007581567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013174704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06097383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007489581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021121576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99339664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157653217","doi":"10.1017/s0008197303006457","title":"Interceptive Subtraction, Unjust Enrichment and Wrongs—A Reply to Professor Birks","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Restitution; Law; Wrongdoing; Obligation; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.026767368077400263,"score_gpt":0.32192189340998867,"score_spread":0.2951545253325884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157653217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42587182,0.0002831024,0.0024819397,0.096966386,0.0008773024,0.000842605,0.000012307494,0.00006803572,0.4725965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903687,0.00013748306,0.00023293974,0.0029920072,0.00038334334,0.00002320499,4.431534e-7,0.000008642686,0.0058532106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988888,0.00024788664,0.00019489224,0.00013727832,0.0002409037,0.00029026688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993098,0.000086703534,0.000107392414,0.00015492467,0.0001308645,0.00021036397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014091753,0.00008093124,0.00009272729,0.000020061509,0.002088876,0.00022498412,0.00020227913,0.000035487716,0.00009421124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092858514,0.000055545752,0.000044510256,0.00017613491,0.00018870203,0.00023422723,0.00004092772,0.00032454528,0.00008286077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015908707,0.000046501802,0.00028747643,0.0000020821344,0.000020518113,0.000003346809,0.0066917506,0.000006105179,0.00031471642,0.96999973,0.02084848,0.0017633698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015279173,0.00004328773,0.0029559839,0.00001443076,0.000020398138,0.000052211974,0.01374302,0.0000026341659,0.0002232464,0.001515737,0.9811785,0.000097724514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016385531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014482851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001483361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008583684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159610229","doi":"10.7202/043501ar","title":"Compensation for Loss of an Economic Nature : An Australian Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounts payable; Compensation (psychology); Scope (computer science); Perspective (graphical); Rehabilitation; Business; Limb loss; Social security; Personal injury; Actuarial science; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law; Physical therapy; Computer science; Psychiatry; Market economy","score_opus":0.013950683456435065,"score_gpt":0.3215184956270114,"score_spread":0.3075678121705763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159610229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844711,0.000012496203,0.0008216265,0.0039220876,0.000040487314,0.00025317539,0.000069318674,0.000033628174,0.010376126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930562,0.000006651741,0.0039601224,0.00015821432,0.000356175,0.000019504703,0.000023408618,0.0000072382995,0.0024124845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949884,0.000033591976,0.00009703356,0.00014711724,0.000065124375,0.0001582903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996223,0.000035229194,0.00006622889,0.00012451003,0.00005612847,0.00009563347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023896877,0.000050399165,0.00007988555,0.000029691235,0.00027771687,0.000036424808,0.00018654979,0.00018963845,0.00006754648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023716391,0.000057979873,0.00004815303,0.000049590384,0.00024526907,0.0002428593,0.0000050267126,0.00015772395,0.000010365843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011159059,0.000035470923,0.00028012504,0.0000027214833,0.000007834295,1.4626427e-7,0.015818879,0.00032092992,0.00015178448,0.98008066,0.00015055055,0.0031397254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011781619,0.00019162123,0.027795516,0.000014939645,0.00008276789,0.0000057105112,0.09567386,0.0057139467,0.004376993,0.33953997,0.5248639,0.00056259875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021484138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012375616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6405407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008582181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009763763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69058836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160510965","doi":"","title":"The Debt-Equity Distinction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Debt; Economics; Statutory law; Positive economics; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.03939687844091073,"score_gpt":0.3244692756357674,"score_spread":0.28507239719485666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160510965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13587934,0.0019919104,0.027823647,0.011413987,0.0007404119,0.000329455,0.0000018882255,0.00012354451,0.8216958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99094146,0.0028021566,0.000031943877,0.000042062693,0.0003999927,0.0000066151324,2.7282138e-7,0.0000047093067,0.0057707657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839026,0.000083016894,0.000114833085,0.00007178853,0.00019572927,0.0011443819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966043,0.000038807197,0.00007967715,0.00009528353,0.000059158538,0.000066663226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002358015,0.0000441317,0.000039572005,0.000011782465,0.0022949355,0.00008547864,0.00033702655,0.00003295886,0.000057021916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008897733,0.000029155884,0.000054405566,0.00011658132,0.00013220649,0.00012830028,0.0000372945,0.00066595315,0.000071154034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005949114,0.000014816977,0.0005566185,1.4392138e-7,0.000011195557,1.2725113e-7,0.0008014582,1.8826613e-7,0.00001052323,0.9456922,0.00009129644,0.052815493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006768203,0.000031966454,0.0022685893,0.0000012441185,0.000009945954,0.000011551091,0.005366483,0.000005993442,0.000014965105,0.7932933,0.19887747,0.00005082852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017633727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036670808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8550621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052539865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013759481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162797822","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-121x.2000.tb00138.x","title":"Illegal transactions: chaos or discretion?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Statutory law; Discretion; Commonwealth; Law; Law reform; Judicial discretion; Political science; Common law; Judicial review","score_opus":0.05893827733802574,"score_gpt":0.3834800210036837,"score_spread":0.32454174366565797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162797822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0687123,0.003806153,0.003766721,0.0913259,0.0007619698,0.0012897514,0.000098249635,0.00077220885,0.82946676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8416401,0.0027517807,0.00026160027,0.0003961783,0.0003320423,0.0001319087,0.0000014196496,0.000008272552,0.1544767],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906623,0.000055351382,0.00016497009,0.00019698997,0.00024967713,0.00026679444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996195,0.00008009398,0.00002795058,0.00013140497,0.000062987005,0.00007805442],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001769718,0.000097788565,0.00014570143,0.000022038283,0.0014885003,0.00008564046,0.00016331061,0.00004693102,0.0043213475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030926596,0.000072641444,0.00007682047,0.00028725874,0.00034855015,0.0003082265,0.0000070321676,0.00012035126,0.0004018873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024800494,0.00062899955,0.0003043366,0.00006132328,0.0005821328,0.000038191338,0.09656201,0.0005300576,0.000074780386,0.4210752,0.019859398,0.46003556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014443483,0.000026171138,0.00032107646,0.000011109012,0.000022281523,0.0000013469795,0.007333382,0.000020287081,0.00002783298,0.00061008945,0.9913593,0.00012270456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003192193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97149986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008224155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007396145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166345381","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2007.36.1.50","title":"Protecting Prepaying Buyers of Unascertained Goods: Why ‘Pay before You Go’ May Be Bad for You","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Legislature; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Commission; Intervention (counseling); Judicial review; Doctrine; Injustice; Law and economics; Common law; Position (finance); Economics","score_opus":0.056863311170841646,"score_gpt":0.38294445570573404,"score_spread":0.3260811445348924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166345381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067942226,0.06892687,0.0034366031,0.15171634,0.0007995556,0.01992368,0.00013178303,0.0006798673,0.7475911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97354054,0.0039806627,0.004629005,0.0048923804,0.0005386821,0.0006885398,0.000041970925,0.000059846425,0.011628338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829024,0.00015504398,0.00061215647,0.00028042437,0.0002446803,0.00041743266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986465,0.0002885378,0.00036159233,0.00043076646,0.00013055146,0.00014206038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032489307,0.00015384743,0.00042053306,0.000041714156,0.00084908976,0.00004965388,0.000476804,0.000060128295,0.00010484476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025374047,0.00011800903,0.00024939928,0.0007212019,0.00022304962,0.00016693668,0.000094719675,0.00023113484,0.000009262103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012022281,0.00008904937,0.0012382112,0.0021066791,0.000037144957,9.746352e-7,0.0015088039,0.000003696236,0.000064566564,0.9223777,0.004032292,0.06852885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001443887,0.000027350336,0.00012369547,0.0015423138,0.00006819064,5.4054163e-7,0.00026359368,0.000009347064,0.00018680963,0.0030714392,0.9944119,0.00015042158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002770088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040730502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99037963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111229994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008188643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9767737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166489623","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.33","title":"Credit Counselling in Canada: An Empirical Examination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Bankruptcy; Debt; Agency (philosophy); Disadvantaged; Business; Empirical research; Point (geometry); Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Creditor","score_opus":0.02640559053585586,"score_gpt":0.28254005054074627,"score_spread":0.25613446000489043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166489623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806271,0.00024619303,0.00012329522,0.006459987,0.00030659628,0.00019280758,0.000032045267,0.000004702349,0.012007262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955051,0.0002330556,0.00027502814,0.003149229,0.00035825465,0.000009622646,0.000007926734,0.000013710098,0.00044805583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864435,0.00013242924,0.000365737,0.0001688158,0.00013638065,0.00055228354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777764,0.00015731489,0.00017394182,0.000120032826,0.0003269956,0.0014440923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011035348,0.000109073146,0.00023546498,0.000044781566,0.0005913329,0.00015713247,0.00026894727,0.00012618408,0.00018814024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067923844,0.0001233222,0.00008443859,0.0002051951,0.0002445776,0.00054559077,0.000005139172,0.00038434917,0.0000016916832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016890835,0.00002658569,0.0074924123,0.000038706363,0.000056057637,0.00008429434,0.20481172,0.00026712008,0.000036539474,0.7712863,0.0057735546,0.010125027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009988127,0.00012580617,0.082257204,0.00015848922,0.00006652593,0.00008334286,0.22207956,0.0027719038,0.0000110530045,0.038349435,0.6523383,0.0007595409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73293686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002808263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069811684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166977184","doi":"10.1017/s0008197301000666","title":"Relief Against Forfeiture: A Restatement","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Doctrine; Law; Jurisdiction; Creditor; Economic Justice; Security interest; Debt; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Unjust enrichment; Choice of law; Restitution; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.029245477412799842,"score_gpt":0.3171947528902771,"score_spread":0.2879492754774773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166977184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09607934,0.00036419908,0.000699401,0.06659446,0.0003363049,0.00022608857,0.000006165963,0.00005315742,0.8356409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890362,0.0015621071,0.00011866561,0.0029979825,0.0011431244,0.000010691804,0.0000016462801,0.0000089137375,0.0051206783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989158,0.0001327756,0.00019799925,0.000092078786,0.0003467235,0.00031465947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993999,0.000057925743,0.000109733686,0.00019250889,0.00008202785,0.00015789592],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011011207,0.00006944574,0.000076630655,0.000015043649,0.0025535296,0.00024503397,0.0004146959,0.0000364989,0.00005894686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028953413,0.000044967215,0.00008117853,0.00016981405,0.00021683023,0.00017284414,0.00004575943,0.00030128993,0.00012331727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000125484485,0.000039032566,0.00012623958,9.47725e-7,0.000015398457,0.00002419802,0.00130425,0.00004739125,0.00011683319,0.9534841,0.038914423,0.005914636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016374321,0.000014151512,0.00053726655,0.00001003433,0.000010355169,0.00003526255,0.0014197447,0.000026207319,0.00002910547,0.0022733856,0.99541026,0.0000704783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001903033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032657047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011233677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000884946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167445073","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12143","title":"The Politics of Jurisdiction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Politics; Political science; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Framing (construction); Exclusive jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Scholarship; Federal jurisdiction; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Geography","score_opus":0.07583192905293384,"score_gpt":0.36920301683825435,"score_spread":0.2933710877853205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167445073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015573775,0.18651639,0.00240463,0.047193684,0.00019403477,0.00074181845,0.000012273237,0.00007023806,0.76130956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492444,0.044786565,0.00016932505,0.0014488152,0.00018919205,0.000038191105,0.0000022028162,0.000005806247,0.004115495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951494,0.000064699154,0.00011812206,0.00004845936,0.00016271324,0.000091076625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996158,0.000033748573,0.000051680603,0.00014806181,0.00009128288,0.00005945395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056569075,0.000025751226,0.000067576046,0.000002078703,0.00028673117,0.000015083079,0.00013790329,0.000015932426,0.000007109766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057180063,0.000016669217,0.000035144174,0.0000678669,0.00014319415,0.00004404606,0.000019539131,0.00003444803,0.000034990226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.2818982e-7,0.0000062157483,0.00000916344,0.000029000714,0.0000016600198,2.7066875e-8,0.000388089,6.812972e-7,0.0000012503946,0.9912643,0.002382363,0.0059171664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017818755,0.0000032743844,0.0000088564775,0.00007127123,0.000010570808,1.2460178e-7,0.000027961827,0.00003425281,0.0000059632616,0.05774058,0.9420596,0.00001971981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017026154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000650002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94768703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002921408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085759224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25738567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168451299","doi":"","title":"Should the Law Preserve Party Control? Litigation Investment, Insurance Law and Double Standards","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.029748161808961737,"score_gpt":0.3067582464924807,"score_spread":0.27701008468351895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168451299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15906946,0.00053201115,0.00032504983,0.02265769,0.0002019484,0.0010201782,0.00022345105,0.00017550217,0.8157947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849838,0.00004721184,0.00013158635,0.012966965,0.0003984531,0.00015886623,0.000010323998,0.000012791453,0.0012900287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983961,0.000253218,0.00022176406,0.00027832543,0.0005252295,0.0003253796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989108,0.00018791825,0.00010540651,0.00038705525,0.0001705043,0.00023835197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014496888,0.00012529123,0.00016260883,0.000008540528,0.0015521892,0.00044206335,0.00033463124,0.00010411474,0.00010914986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007871714,0.00009208631,0.000056230347,0.0001426965,0.00084896234,0.0005366628,0.0000704638,0.00024151838,0.00004565013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019877822,0.000022568423,0.0014826604,0.000008325523,0.000013896455,2.2543294e-7,0.0006926195,0.000026518785,0.00011436547,0.9961052,0.0014395581,0.00007420022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084644795,0.000029645453,0.0016540146,0.000016438093,0.000017251728,3.407903e-7,0.00019763267,0.00006889878,0.00048251412,0.06776845,0.92878884,0.00012950528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03440943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080495074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92833674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008218586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098194665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170220604","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v2n4p17","title":"The Family Trust In New Zealand and the Claims of ‘Unwelcome Beneficiaries’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Trust law; Blind trust; Appeal; Honour; Equity (law); Law; Testamentary trust; Constructive trust; Creditor; Express trust; Nothing; Common law; Political science; Family law; Sociology; Business; Debt; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01685159270415006,"score_gpt":0.29684887342396027,"score_spread":0.2799972807198102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170220604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91071135,0.0013617779,0.000014043834,0.063881196,0.000058577614,0.0000828473,0.000003848799,0.00000158395,0.023884794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973905,0.0011297037,0.000044496835,0.0005762827,0.00017751947,1.6178694e-7,6.5733396e-8,0.0000013534662,0.000679906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999481,0.000039745817,0.00020458497,0.00003044549,0.00012776052,0.0001164687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952525,0.00019031698,0.00011629867,0.000052635518,0.00004385904,0.00007164742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055979704,0.000032884844,0.00010006493,0.000013339103,0.00027832587,0.00008170022,0.00011126054,0.000028209612,0.000002025006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003418577,0.000016744807,0.00002927222,0.00005736136,0.00027705875,0.000051956053,0.000012320272,0.00010913495,1.4267223e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000853973,0.000008679268,0.00059323374,5.9890306e-7,0.0000035128357,4.1105733e-7,0.0021229135,0.0000032287821,0.000011502739,0.99581975,0.0002813997,0.0011462563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006249097,0.000047138565,0.035938945,0.000013455827,0.000014965559,0.000003768737,0.0025071558,0.000038062324,0.000011497493,0.4590419,0.5017243,0.00003388988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005266417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031947228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53677785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012111106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106656975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7961282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170376300","doi":"10.1002/iir.1221","title":"A Statutory Basis for the Anti‐Deprivation Rule?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Rule of law; Insolvency; Legislature; Law and economics; Foundation (evidence); Law; Political science; Basis (linear algebra); Statutory interpretation; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.054489572588834585,"score_gpt":0.3808600742018635,"score_spread":0.32637050161302894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170376300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004689369,0.053754568,0.13399887,0.3803884,0.0034863695,0.0045410097,0.00020914416,0.00031549242,0.41861677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84696066,0.12778307,0.0027533113,0.013643732,0.0018984952,0.0010737596,0.00006320946,0.000024253086,0.0057995208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991806,0.000062622574,0.00022039619,0.00014169273,0.0002717725,0.0001229134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990191,0.00042404782,0.00012172624,0.00017686258,0.00022013723,0.000038136055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010189496,0.000060351384,0.000097668955,0.000020433054,0.00035980367,0.00006150014,0.00048350586,0.000027524819,0.0003578621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010020676,0.000043386743,0.000112233625,0.00012558982,0.00007829561,0.0001580637,0.00003525571,0.000066500696,0.00010490083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013119221,0.000034934666,0.00048113344,0.00007723427,0.000023511479,5.27991e-8,0.000267596,0.0000064081974,0.000035994257,0.8862022,0.013573222,0.09929636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005203545,0.000005007454,0.0030721715,0.0002374075,0.000021017613,2.5784445e-7,0.000036059864,0.00020853418,0.0000091649545,0.0047083613,0.99159044,0.00005952759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031757742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012174508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006864462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080935264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39183387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171753977","doi":"10.1002/iir.94","title":"Consumer insolvency in Australia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Legislation; Debtor; Consumer Protection Act; Legislature; Business; Debt; Law reform; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Consumer law; Creditor; Economics; Accounting; Law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.11550065840964933,"score_gpt":0.4448956130419099,"score_spread":0.32939495463226054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171753977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06334939,0.055396248,0.00031940645,0.058710054,0.0016585876,0.0016056821,0.000049977152,0.00017376487,0.8187369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7731839,0.21005654,0.00034260435,0.0022112245,0.0003027985,0.00016574792,0.000026382968,0.000010537923,0.013700303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987408,0.00008086651,0.000388626,0.00021293828,0.00035195652,0.00022482769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994422,0.000056708355,0.00010679529,0.00017539905,0.0001306415,0.00008826391],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053752004,0.00009460336,0.00016424821,0.00007082728,0.00010826514,0.000045299483,0.00051199336,0.000056060704,0.0042652003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023992056,0.00009215529,0.00009537222,0.00040698837,0.000106142004,0.000284145,0.00004845533,0.00016568844,0.0010222634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008303973,0.00044672427,0.0858272,0.00016886082,0.000042904838,0.00005342883,0.0011897996,0.0000060826446,0.00007221019,0.8302739,0.033590153,0.048320387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107971515,0.0000051201587,0.008489459,0.00062232086,0.000008060874,0.000004043648,0.00004222311,0.0000070025867,0.0000028433356,0.003777748,0.9868219,0.00011133041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038921486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027958357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95323175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015148119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010233412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172510999","doi":"10.5287/ora-jbq6byenm","title":"The public-private nature of charity law in England and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.020091420054840436,"score_gpt":0.27239010682166404,"score_spread":0.2522986867668236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172510999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.831122,0.00013992224,0.000023141625,0.003782257,0.00009314151,0.0007723564,0.0004008227,0.000015470408,0.16365089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767629,0.00736425,0.00029243855,0.000013667794,0.00003751042,5.870017e-7,0.00026990278,0.000012310765,0.015246459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728346,0.00055655517,0.00015590766,0.00040247443,0.00097547914,0.0006261382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976912,0.0007579786,0.0002442255,0.0004125328,0.00058856246,0.00030549816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010813008,0.00016859529,0.00032968516,0.00033391512,0.0024465758,0.0000674647,0.0016532715,0.0003197621,0.00009595409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018364676,0.00018320286,0.00009990927,0.0007083398,0.0014671852,0.00043314378,0.00048881886,0.0014492993,0.000001195734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027723008,0.000089069785,0.007925033,0.00015100141,0.00009451008,0.000039913124,0.0112471515,0.0000017822248,0.00012995466,0.9732993,0.0019520054,0.004793017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005039565,0.000047570946,0.026789855,0.000065239336,0.000017312557,3.7727898e-7,0.049151056,0.00006724694,0.000016288788,0.00497625,0.9181961,0.00016878206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83512074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003894276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021598677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21740786","doi":"10.29173/alr326","title":"Doing “Practical Justice” for Duress in Contract Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Rescission; Equity (law); Economic Justice; Mistake; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04890527607925705,"score_gpt":0.41643898443367133,"score_spread":0.3675337083544143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21740786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025056282,0.0119673405,0.00025820953,0.117432065,0.00010619089,0.0014322323,0.0000049887713,0.00002779119,0.8685206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440956,0.015758764,0.0021293797,0.03632338,0.00031576626,0.00015105601,0.000010935902,0.000010244325,0.0012048408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906904,0.000089416884,0.0002579942,0.00018128853,0.00013443141,0.00026781295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987099,0.0008843599,0.00007925409,0.00018000638,0.00004818187,0.000098298115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005435627,0.000078146346,0.00022267472,0.0000066868606,0.00033394113,0.00006279379,0.00016478769,0.000057029276,0.00013059126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040047866,0.00006765399,0.00008633029,0.00014603543,0.000086246444,0.00023865912,0.000012237615,0.00011528344,0.00008646002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023150396,0.000053242213,0.000005419832,0.00014511327,0.0000026555465,0.0000010947024,0.00014346579,4.854917e-7,0.000008102303,0.9936141,0.0013042284,0.0047198012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013084602,0.000013290933,0.000048547274,0.0004647139,0.00007453244,0.0000014419085,0.000020561532,0.000010292271,0.0000068963827,0.003421731,0.99571186,0.00009529695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020610644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08711436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003979595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057130615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9859112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176320391","doi":"","title":"Woe Unto You, Judges: Or How Reading Frankfurter and Greene, Ruined Me as a Labour Lawyer and Made Me as an Academic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.032251348778853675,"score_gpt":0.30256357004850404,"score_spread":0.2703122212696504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176320391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93829465,0.00091010664,0.00002033144,0.020687634,0.000093210765,0.00046875665,0.000038200113,0.00018126465,0.039305862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94183767,0.00095901504,0.00054731796,0.0032712691,0.00065615104,0.0000715101,0.0000069879966,0.00003191566,0.052618176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981499,0.00015293725,0.00023794018,0.0005365589,0.0003941587,0.00052853377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987627,0.00011592788,0.00011037634,0.00034578246,0.0000769117,0.00058827107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005169528,0.00021723339,0.00025972756,0.000053597632,0.0009950597,0.00043941388,0.0003845891,0.000305139,0.0017203699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020803226,0.0001862452,0.0000490491,0.00031486215,0.00034293582,0.0009824403,0.00012714003,0.00048380057,0.0003971712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056546924,0.00009877819,0.016174419,0.00004738587,0.00006589114,0.000028336246,0.011398837,0.0000019324261,0.0057219174,0.9563445,0.0055642687,0.0044971895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009655427,0.00013978935,0.009978903,0.000064823354,0.00006402799,0.000023749639,0.004384612,0.00013833666,0.0005273277,0.018297788,0.96485263,0.0005624679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0110559575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008735338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95928836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007655042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006045691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178042","doi":"10.29173/alr401","title":"A Revisionist History of Tort Law: From Holmesian Realism to Neoclassical Rationalism, alan Calnan (Durham, n.C: Carolina Academic Press, 2005)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Realism; Rationalism; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.08800107265146155,"score_gpt":0.3598297665241361,"score_spread":0.27182869387267455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012689207,0.14828861,0.000059944483,0.09729374,0.000606378,0.0022913928,0.00014875777,0.00008523598,0.749957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.652716,0.11769922,0.0025952505,0.08142614,0.0045896135,0.0012197775,0.00096630206,0.00017587836,0.13861181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764425,0.00039126474,0.0006245532,0.00040612498,0.0005934354,0.00034038554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980854,0.00032055273,0.00025202538,0.0005724732,0.00017701703,0.00059253356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010035541,0.00017679147,0.00050733227,0.000013876741,0.00022120327,0.000028395882,0.00061542925,0.00016864737,0.00025722393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048680278,0.00015656992,0.00015633956,0.00013725231,0.00037572585,0.00023561677,0.00012268705,0.0002947772,0.00018141358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046531563,0.000027763615,0.00005157525,0.00007699227,0.000011617863,0.0000011519988,0.0012106698,0.0000011949047,0.000014386773,0.73367673,0.26442826,0.00049503485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013651043,0.000015666596,0.000077076606,0.000730648,0.000088914494,0.0000012186209,0.000025371764,0.0000070069655,0.000008512145,0.0015123145,0.99721134,0.00018539577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35289165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10748968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73278314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050511665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071757904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9087963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179498709","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198268581.003.0006","title":"Towards a Theory of Contract","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Tort; Unjust enrichment; Situated; Normative; Law and economics; Private law; Law; Equity (law); Breach of contract; Nothing; Political science; Damages; Sociology; Epistemology; Liability; Public law; Philosophy; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.03723195056172664,"score_gpt":0.3046576213991783,"score_spread":0.26742567083745167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179498709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014989506,0.00016108569,0.0000962474,0.00067985675,0.000031458334,0.00017777989,0.00003873284,0.000038494407,0.99876136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.080886014,0.0005945392,0.00010492747,0.00019730043,0.00018188597,0.0000047295835,0.0000052212995,0.000010243562,0.9180151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941915,0.000014249742,0.0001520377,0.00011608709,0.00019863633,0.000099840174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958605,0.00007207007,0.00007895332,0.00015913417,0.0000469731,0.000056801775],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025641618,0.00007714691,0.00015199375,0.000025377334,0.00010196347,0.000016569824,0.00020066454,0.00016893439,0.027061438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012328383,0.00006466494,0.00011080997,0.0000133140275,0.00023899764,0.000032326243,0.000017610402,0.00011125408,0.00027960917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032918372,0.0000061067776,5.528504e-7,0.0000018899818,0.0000134423635,4.2737472e-7,0.0005141416,1.5692133e-7,0.0000016179407,0.9461483,0.00065141934,0.052658662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002477203,0.000004307518,0.000014114881,0.00000874701,0.000012077524,8.012031e-8,0.00003542414,2.883554e-7,0.0000054427946,0.3619972,0.63784474,0.000052796444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013987122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072578434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6371933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027440055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023808923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97382796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180453660","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005993","title":"A Duty to Make Restitution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Duty; Mistake; Law and economics; Liability; Law; Payment; Common law; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.027549752726063303,"score_gpt":0.3140123958049609,"score_spread":0.28646264307889757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180453660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61815953,0.0004695933,0.0020363415,0.073626675,0.0008983749,0.00059356313,0.000020149255,0.000024074761,0.30417168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957143,0.000016553675,0.0011540758,0.0015690413,0.0003504206,0.000007947865,2.538737e-7,0.000004518803,0.0011828953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914116,0.000049153423,0.00021143586,0.00008738316,0.00022041635,0.00029048306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834824,0.000036591846,0.00009469074,0.00013026735,0.00031056147,0.001079635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040017482,0.00005551771,0.00009196422,0.000069647416,0.00058227486,0.00021404675,0.0004183687,0.000051533276,0.0004350779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017122072,0.000052193333,0.00004999034,0.00022837787,0.00022881287,0.0003035589,0.000010498312,0.00014863357,0.0003443443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001416922,0.000007286762,0.0015104392,0.0000025763698,0.0000055859805,0.000026777074,0.0034796183,0.000055836066,0.00025965538,0.97985303,0.010886344,0.0039114193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005171528,0.000027190663,0.009775696,0.000039830862,0.000006050217,0.00001178403,0.00035441262,0.0000038117707,0.000078738296,0.0068719313,0.98269916,0.00007970438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31193638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.583548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023214132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015934462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6926455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W218283612","doi":"","title":"Profitable Justice: Aligning Third-Party Financing of Litigation with the Normative Functions of the Canadian Judicial System","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Legislature; Sophistication; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Business; Normative; Diversity (politics); Law and economics; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014073543294201228,"score_gpt":0.24836978966143086,"score_spread":0.23429624636722962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W218283612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22968736,0.000012649276,0.005635801,0.011143208,0.00017062851,0.00074144336,0.000025967496,0.000035840512,0.7525471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827224,4.8580716e-7,0.00013280183,0.000110478046,0.000097308824,0.000032116954,0.0000014094339,0.0000029698365,0.0013501813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932045,0.000110497334,0.00013696935,0.0000720419,0.0002145693,0.00014546012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931467,0.00013009027,0.00014741086,0.00015247327,0.00020904845,0.000046330562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065650424,0.000042852636,0.00007604583,0.000019674102,0.0015330125,0.000029771409,0.00017257547,0.00003536996,0.0000124139815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009851996,0.000022212002,0.000027457418,0.00034748804,0.00022048336,0.000109638175,0.00001850093,0.00007590711,0.0000072693647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016608816,0.000005921199,0.0025464902,0.000031722586,0.000008923391,1.8680552e-8,0.011873903,0.00048835773,0.00012857583,0.98276335,0.0019827085,0.0001683959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001068844,0.00024942876,0.15189596,0.0008562781,0.00088975637,0.0000042047955,0.4879984,0.017719777,0.016824955,0.004500804,0.31726685,0.0007247649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45639494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79486805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97826254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108031985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059360394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184059481","doi":"","title":"The Juridical Control on Expropriation in the Jordanian Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dirasat: Shari'a and Law Sciences","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Legitimacy; Control (management); Compensation (psychology); Law; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Politics; Management; Geography","score_opus":0.019231606709241983,"score_gpt":0.3189839530715979,"score_spread":0.2997523463623559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184059481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52991396,0.0000689602,0.000024299665,0.06443069,0.00029978206,0.00047687342,0.0000098969795,0.000034384077,0.40474114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650866,0.000035431236,0.000037657344,0.0030050436,0.00024126878,0.00005074882,6.73567e-7,0.0000022494976,0.000118282594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987905,0.00013098058,0.0001375947,0.00021702914,0.00045774374,0.00026616326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991774,0.0005107688,0.000053538628,0.00016562857,0.000026890973,0.00006576228],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024844634,0.00006785689,0.00006853431,0.0000149867765,0.0033510951,0.00068078545,0.00060059974,0.000057103494,0.00003075538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012501761,0.000034198863,0.000029699575,0.00025926775,0.0018926569,0.00021509644,0.0000283989,0.00024096626,0.000025086398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031221246,0.000028377215,0.00069268467,5.199357e-7,8.932178e-7,3.7552383e-7,0.0019141004,0.0000013876204,0.00017903655,0.9951752,0.00007467361,0.0019296315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019857544,0.00005567581,0.010962966,0.0000055001274,0.000004916749,7.6187365e-7,0.0024710454,0.00022091086,0.00007502115,0.09033569,0.895566,0.0001029195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072026807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06990624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9048395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000094320385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007730836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184887330","doi":"","title":"INTERIM CONDENSED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental science; Waste management; Operations management; Economics; Business; Engineering; Political science; History","score_opus":0.08623232328657399,"score_gpt":0.3373713035045046,"score_spread":0.25113898021793063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184887330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3841409,0.00018565927,0.0137347765,0.04951838,0.00043253982,0.003462439,0.000054984248,0.00020540379,0.5482649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869895,0.000028249418,0.000578061,0.00052608195,0.0001132833,0.00021562178,0.0000018702522,0.000004797876,0.0115425205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941987,0.00002364569,0.00010614311,0.00015048223,0.00010572478,0.00019410913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995245,0.00013993023,0.000040048093,0.00015927484,0.000079261285,0.00005703947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003445504,0.000060268983,0.000068007444,0.000016760328,0.00043742213,0.000070254704,0.00022647201,0.000049557664,0.0007539581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000208111,0.00003804895,0.00003694771,0.000054868364,0.00026366417,0.000114544346,0.00004874624,0.00006260276,0.00010809432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048079644,0.000037035203,0.004399227,0.000013096573,0.000040111863,6.4439473e-7,0.019178938,8.195136e-8,0.00046918477,0.9051601,0.06829574,0.0023577604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006922958,0.000111117166,0.060195804,0.000008617876,0.000049213795,0.0000024318128,0.018802648,0.0003705938,0.0009282966,0.033397365,0.88513696,0.00030466044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026831212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027547511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87176275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020090081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006324207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8255313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185371555","doi":"10.1177/1473779515592833","title":"Injured passengers and the defence of illegality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Appeal; Tort; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Business; Proposition; High Court; Liability; Economics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.07494922749480872,"score_gpt":0.38303665179963603,"score_spread":0.30808742430482733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185371555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021338125,0.18429768,0.000016543472,0.09152344,0.00009797101,0.00095263636,0.000008353708,0.00004074201,0.72092885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734941,0.023315873,0.00009997526,0.0021739576,0.000041641837,0.000037691654,0.0000011857637,0.000002986517,0.00083258335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912006,0.00033275364,0.00019432556,0.000087377324,0.00017111977,0.00009433798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931717,0.000167996,0.00010401642,0.00025500794,0.00007169286,0.00008413335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016931666,0.000048058264,0.00020415988,0.0000061839783,0.00019556293,0.00002551034,0.00024313983,0.000014390183,0.000032728818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112811336,0.000029239087,0.00005197192,0.00028274444,0.00077135366,0.000074026015,0.000071184644,0.00008332263,0.000012484773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024255435,0.000008830379,0.00020370835,0.00008408242,0.0000034852005,8.8329294e-8,0.0003527444,1.01675724e-7,7.0838365e-7,0.9885616,0.005243046,0.005539205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012133558,0.000002621916,0.00020271946,0.00024346093,0.000025917496,1.8508946e-7,0.00009159861,0.0000020868665,0.000005465316,0.012278934,0.9869843,0.000041334915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031977755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011325543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016633552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052206433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63199186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187050213","doi":"","title":"Sentencing Aboriginal Offenders: The Honour of the Crown, Reconciliation and Rehabilitation of the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Honour; Law; Criminology; Political science; Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.011074917181053197,"score_gpt":0.22922822752205874,"score_spread":0.21815331034100555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187050213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8935902,0.000014378498,0.000042289492,0.09177734,0.000073437586,0.00025815147,0.000020220314,0.000012765541,0.014211217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961166,0.000039773295,0.0003939742,0.00007171669,0.000032752956,4.6557003e-7,8.0297167e-7,0.0000032289424,0.0033407067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929047,0.00024393912,0.00009376441,0.00007902499,0.00018291765,0.00010987362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992364,0.0002619431,0.00020641541,0.00020142576,0.00005939265,0.00003440297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021126572,0.000048890084,0.000080064565,0.000021476204,0.00042120463,0.00001113927,0.00028399288,0.000045227804,0.000027886344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005352573,0.000030742704,0.00007377103,0.000306264,0.000588193,0.0007066964,0.000089924455,0.00009694931,7.524815e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002533729,0.00006721816,0.15936022,0.000041440868,0.000021750206,4.9573416e-8,0.047567867,0.000034345143,0.00019211287,0.78786045,0.004614818,0.00021439332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002946831,0.000033571767,0.51152074,0.00008442531,0.00006929639,8.785822e-8,0.07512639,0.000013324015,0.00618067,0.0026016093,0.40395957,0.00011561032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029474514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006262344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7852588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038481194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014898452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187887643","doi":"","title":"Employee Pension Rights and the False Promise of Trust Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Fiduciary; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Business; Trust law; Pension plan; Political science","score_opus":0.020904545184424042,"score_gpt":0.27116886865306616,"score_spread":0.25026432346864214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187887643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.942042,0.00091018045,0.00018969814,0.0015684215,0.00004764431,0.00024094805,0.000001029394,0.000014696653,0.054985363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974603,0.0008013917,0.000055324064,0.000045489513,0.000107346226,0.0000051857287,1.8263847e-7,0.0000042331526,0.0015205246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889576,0.00011718905,0.0001503763,0.00007968378,0.0001654135,0.0005915534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963534,0.00004082676,0.00010616254,0.00009861253,0.00006404659,0.00005500299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016379765,0.00005215564,0.000095691525,0.000016719605,0.00071906246,0.000028041894,0.00020641816,0.000037575635,0.000040933865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025568517,0.000030301075,0.00005350979,0.000082178405,0.00043253737,0.000119837394,0.000026612655,0.00045037494,0.000007930831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037300437,0.000016309144,0.00038608612,7.2781575e-7,0.000016429047,2.3178328e-7,0.0045493958,1.2934048e-7,0.000038463655,0.994181,0.00002039051,0.0007535544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062998186,0.00005321914,0.000813129,0.0000059735403,0.00002848899,0.000018874118,0.0025136578,0.0000050375043,0.00014778967,0.9790392,0.01668791,0.000056728484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008821037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027340738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055418305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085670894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046399087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2188208345","doi":"","title":"China Officials’ Property Publicity: A Long Way to Go","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; China; Language change; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Political science; Work (physics); Property rights; Element (criminal law); Public administration; Law; Business; Law and economics; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.08568809469109698,"score_gpt":0.39403782259575154,"score_spread":0.30834972790465454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2188208345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7438991,0.00015435192,0.00015722612,0.03462987,0.00009010234,0.0006256571,0.00001118198,0.00025452752,0.22017798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98089856,0.000052198862,0.0008851317,0.00043933355,0.00016915413,0.0001101792,0.00006582729,0.000010620097,0.017368997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987116,0.00019884741,0.00024939264,0.00020524225,0.0003470443,0.0002878587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812984,0.000033150613,0.000107521184,0.0006985087,0.00073876884,0.0002922313],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010041143,0.00011043395,0.00013263177,0.00003295604,0.0014143791,0.0011384059,0.0010634436,0.00009957392,0.000060480077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008448043,0.000074264215,0.000058491045,0.0005121325,0.00042045207,0.0010455811,0.000341251,0.00020535995,0.0006452148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009133741,0.00052956137,0.018747816,0.000022629021,0.000047035854,0.0000012955559,0.11563445,0.0004166077,0.0021041164,0.6291062,0.07337431,0.15992464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001913966,0.000024450903,0.058392152,0.000015428104,0.000006855119,9.804363e-7,0.0017721128,0.000098273485,0.00021747584,0.0015172344,0.9375804,0.00018324921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111197205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008940175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8642061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028166155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001504641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190296521","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Law, Chapter 1 - Introduction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.01013650565671587,"score_gpt":0.2799587554258344,"score_spread":0.26982224976911856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190296521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13623157,0.003674337,0.009519158,0.42139375,0.00086063315,0.0005806572,0.0000039611764,0.00023834052,0.4274976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816726,0.0020156046,0.00015247162,0.00038026902,0.006603706,0.0000061349997,0.000001168683,0.000007793639,0.009160254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984709,0.00004113633,0.00013160793,0.000116137264,0.00019610973,0.0010440825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969953,0.000012069248,0.00006467257,0.000097130134,0.000055494645,0.00007112368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001278649,0.00005655656,0.000059636208,0.00003058177,0.0008336723,0.000069351314,0.00018401233,0.00004512481,0.0003335349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022376842,0.000052403844,0.000057218575,0.0000864328,0.0000906041,0.00032552984,0.000015516098,0.0007377203,0.00023658472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003237823,0.000019097326,0.00002811388,1.8610088e-7,0.000011467153,1.0296698e-7,0.00050691294,0.000017180248,0.00009075326,0.95862216,0.00034779892,0.040353008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084442254,0.00001875523,0.000036764097,9.543407e-7,0.0000069739963,0.00002165095,0.0011730347,0.000010662536,0.000043829295,0.19559462,0.80294806,0.00006025849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005816154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01718857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84544104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005884308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005497225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95916253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191467437","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.019","title":"Convergence and divergence in the worlds of the trust: duties and liabilities of trustees under the Chinese trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Divergence (linguistics); Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019393527128268074,"score_gpt":0.22741296544726472,"score_spread":0.20801943831899664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191467437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1954955,0.00040406678,0.0000054950424,0.0005064072,0.00008672577,0.00064254255,0.00012534665,0.000009854964,0.80272406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57420105,0.00051045604,0.000004624603,0.000031959455,0.000025942687,0.000002015365,7.5551355e-7,0.000004570778,0.4252186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990539,0.00013020796,0.0001779025,0.00020808731,0.0002811336,0.00014874786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890995,0.00033226263,0.0002172901,0.00039802192,0.00010127666,0.000041189567],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025192028,0.00015916163,0.00022293211,0.000040964183,0.0004914088,0.000037688093,0.0007787469,0.00013058049,0.000022075323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027666043,0.000091550304,0.0000903177,0.000029202787,0.0028396794,0.00009067175,0.00040153417,0.00025619217,6.591312e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009702028,0.0000062342997,0.00211106,0.00004439681,0.000021461356,5.4051293e-7,0.006627746,0.000003662059,0.0000076148795,0.99051297,0.0004994777,0.0001551386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005389975,0.000045320274,0.10368875,0.00023795138,0.00026802596,0.0000036104084,0.03414298,0.00014449768,0.00009154486,0.0045146123,0.85581267,0.00051103835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080720205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007595971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98599833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003783792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001042717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191663734","doi":"10.29173/alr279","title":"The Contractual Principle of Good Faith and the Duty of Honesty in Bhasin v. Hrynew","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; McGill University","keywords":"Honesty; Duty; Good faith; Faith; Law; Supreme court; Fair dealing; Uniform Commercial Code; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.030014734433572596,"score_gpt":0.33940230817950645,"score_spread":0.30938757374593384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191663734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1624609,0.19528638,0.000024945424,0.10923455,0.00018285977,0.0044592544,0.000019561021,0.00001998344,0.52831155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759897,0.022587972,0.000029201618,0.000501706,0.000028569095,0.000046207933,0.0000010970728,0.000003966735,0.00081159634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998987,0.00027796268,0.0003152533,0.000097535274,0.00019035135,0.00013186251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840534,0.0010185532,0.00018455026,0.0002537604,0.000078737816,0.000059080965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018507038,0.000059617556,0.00024778693,0.000004371102,0.00014518978,0.000019120014,0.00027236142,0.000030749667,0.00001390417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077192363,0.000029547859,0.00005238327,0.0001874274,0.0006813839,0.00007555026,0.00006170365,0.00008140295,0.000008079538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062049817,0.00002204342,0.00070962694,0.000060174403,0.0000067149485,6.987756e-8,0.0011075853,3.2276014e-7,0.0000014536668,0.9959093,0.00013906711,0.002037472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036819768,0.000010642683,0.0012563383,0.00023320522,0.000028097968,7.03651e-7,0.0001829902,0.0000069766998,0.000011045422,0.0028601498,0.99499804,0.00004364162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059405938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12443808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001568346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013653713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9468576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192778908","doi":"","title":"Unjust Enrichment, Existing Categories and Kerr v. Baranow: A Reply to Professor McInnes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06611391344659903,"score_gpt":0.3715723487003853,"score_spread":0.30545843525378624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192778908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.382864,0.0003160778,0.000982258,0.03468812,0.0002846159,0.00070884073,0.0000059389486,0.00021477662,0.5799354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614564,0.000024253814,0.001552483,0.0012671385,0.00038909234,0.000076924625,0.0000013627315,0.000005945834,0.03522641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923927,0.00004397069,0.00012251073,0.00014211384,0.00013954582,0.00031260043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995039,0.00007752336,0.00003574996,0.00013104301,0.00005150601,0.00020025963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048700473,0.00006565583,0.000079156605,0.000020010631,0.00067789253,0.00007752604,0.00010904667,0.000032132873,0.0001293886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015672958,0.000054387274,0.000016868324,0.00021490546,0.000085000014,0.00029517652,0.00008030951,0.0000558512,0.00010427576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032010846,0.000039382376,0.019099178,0.000009117551,0.000005439087,1.6257418e-7,0.0228135,3.9877074e-7,0.00034037099,0.948737,0.0064746533,0.0024775735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065540604,0.000010627291,0.011108978,0.0000050202634,0.000008356558,4.911594e-7,0.013656488,0.000003908167,0.00028893235,0.0018799333,0.97285503,0.000116714706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049460055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011097367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96638036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034202538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045360786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7476914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195285776","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i2.4711","title":"ARCHITECTURE, RITUALS, AND NORMS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; McGill University","keywords":"Adjudication; Economic Justice; Legitimacy; Dignity; Political science; Law; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Dispute resolution; Civil procedure; Realisation; Civil law (Civil law); Value (mathematics); Public law; Law and economics; Social science","score_opus":0.06755592402990689,"score_gpt":0.36041342655953085,"score_spread":0.29285750252962395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195285776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7550821,0.00027527858,0.00037589736,0.008567625,0.00012121266,0.00077280606,0.000017627997,0.000058137044,0.23472933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977111,0.00002090622,0.0005957795,0.0004658917,0.00020822039,0.000031305637,0.0000011923006,0.000008437877,0.00095716736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991694,0.00003502483,0.00015717297,0.00018129547,0.00025715915,0.00019991548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945325,0.000069568916,0.000055063694,0.0001357869,0.00008471949,0.00020160874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003703197,0.00007084316,0.00012601279,0.000090997426,0.00008014172,0.00008416693,0.00035401352,0.000060537233,0.000029221563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003507571,0.00006452892,0.00001630941,0.000339449,0.00011430107,0.0002144849,0.00014298802,0.00011491924,0.00002320082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058910914,0.0015446423,0.18906151,0.0016142715,0.000110971545,0.000042726777,0.29139814,0.008101962,0.0023686215,0.40645915,0.05400021,0.044708673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017948202,0.00019743956,0.20932448,0.00030138396,0.00015957111,0.0000047395806,0.015409028,0.00022954697,0.00090412836,0.021318845,0.7495633,0.000792743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025312584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008015531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6955631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035396446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002163009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44728547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196194358","doi":"","title":"Delgamuukw and the Protection of Aboriginal Land Interests","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legislature; Power (physics); Mainstream; High Court; Duty","score_opus":0.01578682440849879,"score_gpt":0.2962226893115836,"score_spread":0.2804358649030848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196194358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8748519,0.00017292918,0.00009558506,0.0043809437,0.000047324127,0.0003953796,0.000006192683,0.000038031932,0.12001174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961869,0.00014800072,0.0001111885,0.00016867225,0.0001774874,0.000045558456,7.323353e-7,0.000003801861,0.00315763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944824,0.00008775746,0.000110446366,0.00010478155,0.0001341519,0.000114645045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969727,0.00004014225,0.000039866547,0.00012505951,0.00003424696,0.00006339761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034916025,0.000046458117,0.000077845645,0.000008905179,0.0003478547,0.00006581981,0.00013321881,0.000039020546,0.00047584702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002239989,0.00003182498,0.000029589972,0.00011792377,0.0003831176,0.00012535756,0.00001113946,0.000112277485,0.00007259519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007365463,0.00003116495,0.0023776093,0.000008692676,0.000011497206,4.844876e-7,0.0019507236,0.00001547955,0.00008478858,0.9838256,0.00027639073,0.011343862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052333943,0.000018499826,0.0051601846,0.000016627617,0.000010949187,0.0000014319099,0.00020855789,0.00006901463,0.0001261747,0.011423662,0.98237675,0.00006477844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03158727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02025912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98210037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018805935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050621213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198599815","doi":"","title":"Rewarding Ownership, Valuing Possessors: Making Sense of Articles 957-962 of the C.C.Q.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Law and economics; Valuation (finance); Legislator; Duty; Economic Justice; Property (philosophy); Civil code; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Accounting; Philosophy; Legislation","score_opus":0.01738419350038584,"score_gpt":0.29232357172789447,"score_spread":0.27493937822750864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198599815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98383373,0.0005982896,0.0016736926,0.00300112,0.00007330265,0.00010676429,0.000001779998,0.000015358954,0.010695967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986057,0.00016381865,0.00012928949,0.000030388519,0.0002874329,0.0000015836329,1.8648886e-7,0.000008595017,0.0007729809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981712,0.00014024753,0.00030486102,0.00009622265,0.00037852582,0.00090896105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928343,0.00010068602,0.0003274638,0.00014419052,0.00011705176,0.000027181457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023552494,0.000067397385,0.00012468806,0.000046039182,0.0005276981,0.000039715927,0.00026971384,0.00004859459,0.000015318234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013645159,0.000047562193,0.00014403513,0.00037087392,0.00017302863,0.0001368198,0.00004231303,0.0005510463,0.0000023468513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070441197,0.00003478633,0.00505625,0.0000043324007,0.000025052299,3.6702352e-7,0.0014287824,0.00026798114,0.0062866206,0.98451054,0.000027738852,0.002350475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038084053,0.00005301909,0.005801941,0.000120774836,0.00008130192,0.000054713048,0.025804399,0.00016017578,0.006224329,0.9547402,0.006400458,0.00017780787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018848943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054746675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02977033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003386151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010870575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40586802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203339889","doi":"","title":"Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Where Morguard Stands after Beals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Damages; Statute; Limiting; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011130020030534354,"score_gpt":0.28648607565939616,"score_spread":0.2753560556288618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203339889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6971453,0.007199296,0.051395692,0.009320875,0.00025461082,0.00097419793,0.0000396028,0.00008354008,0.23358689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99348736,0.0041304794,0.00015831254,0.000090169146,0.00022015999,0.000018970946,0.0000015100238,0.0000094376255,0.0018835982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796295,0.00003647619,0.0002655706,0.00011182611,0.0004132717,0.001209901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995172,0.0000143538155,0.00014968644,0.00012194276,0.00010025018,0.00009653469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001134961,0.00008375712,0.000121887126,0.000046274756,0.00033620652,0.000047134858,0.00025960332,0.000055666096,0.00033765606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019517123,0.00007289585,0.000102817634,0.00016542527,0.00009433568,0.00019758764,0.000029103052,0.00049480784,0.000019238336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002150893,0.00005253604,0.00078852207,0.0000032605703,0.000050372706,7.738904e-7,0.001414107,0.0001118041,0.00006473796,0.99530494,0.000047653353,0.0021397946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090328365,0.00024997583,0.00023897931,0.000036351452,0.00003918828,0.000010748636,0.017994976,0.00000306673,0.00035501324,0.90102404,0.07898897,0.00015543161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00147152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011462743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29634207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013003217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002312097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63964796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205344416","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511494956.006","title":"The Hague Trusts Convention twenty years on","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Fifteenth; Session (web analytics); Convention; Commission; Law; Political science; State (computer science); International law; History; Business; Classics; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.029708616293013478,"score_gpt":0.24666015807140762,"score_spread":0.21695154177839415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205344416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017188904,0.00005444681,0.00003746158,0.00029309164,0.00021739044,0.00042477145,0.00010849207,0.00009045416,0.998602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009843583,0.0003381999,0.00001085104,0.000079252735,0.00039236154,0.0000013653039,0.000017794326,0.000017348528,0.98929924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990055,0.00005278881,0.000115359566,0.00027397365,0.0003210786,0.00023131336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916697,0.00009842647,0.0001638454,0.00035851897,0.00008269356,0.00012953102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001968283,0.00014692034,0.00013669809,0.00004573792,0.0010021756,0.000098186036,0.0005340976,0.00023093764,0.00001456781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010658475,0.00014767412,0.00017559409,0.000008141754,0.00045503926,0.000056786153,0.00012916219,0.00033880377,0.000107196174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017616318,0.000005865723,6.457426e-7,0.0000030568106,0.00002888144,0.000009257045,0.00013760992,0.0000017563848,0.0000015217199,0.96229106,0.02982552,0.007677212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017446974,0.000013076673,0.000051699444,0.00003305722,0.0000549932,3.69818e-7,0.00012198171,0.000008390097,0.000014314157,0.00005836566,0.99930334,0.00016592476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081385614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017439536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96947783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029753588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014529526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77080256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2205502416","doi":"","title":"Disputes about Disclosure of Financial Information in Arbitration: Cases and Guidelines","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of employment studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Publishing; Project commissioning; Accounting; Business; Law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.06546266812883465,"score_gpt":0.40948406247575353,"score_spread":0.34402139434691886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2205502416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98233837,0.0014749145,0.000042770414,0.014110512,0.00021762012,0.00008157136,0.00001902149,0.0000042445936,0.001710997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991931,0.006740127,0.0004840982,0.0003683249,0.00031337974,0.000005367892,0.0000016879956,0.0000016356132,0.00015434687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989743,0.000027594719,0.0005191611,0.00004219952,0.00036806506,0.000068645015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894816,0.0001380615,0.00023010878,0.00003210355,0.0006242618,0.0000273171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035005173,0.000052119634,0.00012573859,0.0000847335,0.000084758154,0.000035934,0.00014081378,0.000022627382,0.000056403882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060893304,0.00004138015,0.000042229898,0.00008031122,0.00012686815,0.0005562926,0.000025194036,0.000058302645,0.0000020817893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004800807,0.00059728214,0.3211971,0.00005870452,0.000597803,0.00006375468,0.08054099,0.0016861255,0.00021464376,0.28352275,0.022310995,0.28872976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016060132,0.00024659428,0.38555962,0.00070560037,0.000056808385,0.000030274334,0.0077627213,0.00006894141,0.0003861691,0.013482224,0.5898415,0.00025351084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042697942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089271273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5675305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053975255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009081166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16874336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206302633","doi":"","title":"The Contributory Negligence Act at Seventy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Statute; Law; Plaintiff; Legislation; Political science; Common law; Contributory negligence; Liability","score_opus":0.022451049987480008,"score_gpt":0.3136690229461367,"score_spread":0.2912179729586567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206302633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6399055,0.029670704,0.008619882,0.09579693,0.0018333216,0.00096076616,0.000013553152,0.0002298456,0.2229695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97262883,0.0042959712,0.000009622129,0.00011589147,0.0005639197,0.000007326585,7.0270835e-7,0.0000058801993,0.022371829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977503,0.00015811308,0.00014307477,0.00009240714,0.00035724696,0.001498856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934906,0.00009836149,0.00010802052,0.00012785796,0.00013893849,0.00017776353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036899028,0.000060183487,0.00006476925,0.000012676956,0.0019239271,0.000116572795,0.00044153957,0.00004499968,0.00001815707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023745694,0.00004068975,0.00006569335,0.00013501811,0.00014893782,0.00013754236,0.000051734085,0.0007049424,0.00014973723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015231711,0.000014852086,0.0010199693,1.6062266e-7,0.000023412553,5.9142786e-7,0.0010118115,0.000012851081,0.0000263554,0.9809477,0.0015653679,0.015361747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001558349,0.000032587628,0.00025011078,0.0000017331342,0.0000075183834,0.00001921997,0.0048753168,0.000014781822,0.000019261222,0.21824871,0.7763148,0.00006013894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006398916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022445455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7747494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002107539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004672159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207041337","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Deference in Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in Australia - Part 1","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Judicial deference; Political science; Administrative law; Judicial review; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.4736815141253664,"score_gpt":0.5166294284328811,"score_spread":0.042947914307514656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207041337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31292874,0.000270518,0.000011530345,0.06445895,0.00008817305,0.005626435,0.0003732808,0.000010991016,0.6162314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97322017,0.0020362155,0.00012438944,0.000028289933,0.00002026674,0.000015646683,0.000013474401,0.0000020685616,0.024539482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800575,0.0005535315,0.00027010264,0.00017223466,0.00073640025,0.0002619763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768955,0.0010446581,0.000106667474,0.00013873281,0.0009212515,0.00009913569],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019896117,0.00005348435,0.00014356506,0.00014403569,0.00028995908,0.000057373032,0.0011464701,0.000058793652,0.0010124367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011698571,0.000047277514,0.000039757542,0.0017943855,0.0008557995,0.0004428143,0.00019897605,0.00026340957,0.00004329972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016025277,0.00010412778,0.001838756,0.000014799535,0.00000759219,0.0000034786215,0.0007036672,0.0000051355833,0.000035831712,0.9654221,0.030964995,0.0008834906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006601048,0.00011134759,0.063618295,0.0016180772,0.0000063265634,3.6803075e-7,0.012955926,0.000005514449,0.0005318304,0.044925585,0.87539935,0.00016730114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033867702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016752355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9204965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019044164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010979401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2207630929","doi":"","title":"Castillo v. Castillo: Closing the Barn Door","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Barn; Political science; Geography; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.018927095808275354,"score_gpt":0.2838200957096416,"score_spread":0.2648929999013663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2207630929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2890621,0.0006902404,0.0005388722,0.015344085,0.00054612494,0.0006060242,0.0000469306,0.00027233004,0.69289327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98284477,0.000022032742,0.00047352226,0.0009853713,0.0013086313,0.000045025572,0.000007340544,0.000017351464,0.014295938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857277,0.000118243675,0.0002262344,0.00026596602,0.0003780596,0.00043874022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917316,0.0001461695,0.00008602034,0.00035368,0.000084898114,0.00015604582],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000479754,0.00012510856,0.00012538585,0.000020066329,0.0017200962,0.0003797948,0.00047466275,0.0000909364,0.00054650044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009116985,0.000094495525,0.00009948911,0.0003286895,0.00038813948,0.00026171806,0.000088462635,0.00026290806,0.0008071024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034157497,0.000039274637,0.0015631183,0.0000034454888,0.0000070834703,0.000005861369,0.00053956715,0.00010991235,0.00045556136,0.9847752,0.011347685,0.0011498735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001344115,0.000007843816,0.0032869414,0.000010533211,0.000016297518,0.0000030474225,0.00057694496,0.00005581179,0.0002149114,0.0089487415,0.986594,0.0001504741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0823216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06560313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97582644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115441704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014548401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208097420","doi":"","title":"Interprovincial Inter-Insurer Interactions: Unifund v. ICBC","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Appeal; Indemnity; Tribunal; Law; Tort; Liability; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02210912419191196,"score_gpt":0.2992141549200961,"score_spread":0.27710503072818415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208097420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31384355,0.0047353613,0.054705225,0.061084535,0.003051446,0.0008608816,0.000018650166,0.00044952036,0.5612508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659199,0.002773222,0.00006653821,0.00024507206,0.00117745,0.000011044188,0.0000010918973,0.000014853533,0.02979084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976915,0.00013565845,0.0002631233,0.00017152686,0.00026436095,0.001473826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940777,0.00006074134,0.00013924553,0.00014957503,0.000108283675,0.00013437125],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010644431,0.00011001024,0.00011768069,0.00010209105,0.0008918832,0.00019907102,0.00043639934,0.00006502108,0.0009824996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012614964,0.00010154212,0.00013315717,0.00025742067,0.00013089085,0.00045003055,0.00005331401,0.001664012,0.00048402682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011622741,0.00013241563,0.00071600603,0.0000012863425,0.00006542852,0.000002169863,0.0033430194,0.000004756695,0.000066235116,0.85158294,0.0019510078,0.1421231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025850834,0.00008986388,0.00012568604,0.00001710314,0.000023386898,0.00008153566,0.0072987527,0.00022782187,0.000011522828,0.119766764,0.8719181,0.00018097673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014314482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027175473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86996704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013910972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078203034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208978433","doi":"","title":"Forty Years of Restitution: A Retrospective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07136146423138953,"score_gpt":0.31981976211286745,"score_spread":0.2484582978814779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208978433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16629693,0.000005555013,0.0006496539,0.000116076524,0.000028906348,0.00006777402,0.0000015223425,0.000025704518,0.8328079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960215,0.000010295599,0.0017164383,0.00002645992,0.000034189947,0.000004902468,1.7972009e-7,0.0000010334717,0.0021849745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974614,0.000009176158,0.000051828963,0.000052135267,0.00008225841,0.000058438854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983126,0.000006821223,0.000022329083,0.00007407912,0.000038483282,0.000027002083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011940317,0.000014169821,0.00003205549,0.000009738157,0.00007184588,0.0000036655567,0.000076317156,0.000019962372,0.0005361316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003583199,0.000013389421,0.000019654999,0.00011250336,0.00010155793,0.000058320045,0.000013750965,0.000022988625,0.00003710382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010654885,0.000015116508,0.010823738,3.3212757e-7,0.0000016999721,1.928702e-7,0.0034028317,6.2620884e-8,0.00003227478,0.9849149,0.0003212653,0.0004865333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007875915,0.000023254352,0.79868406,0.0000032796856,0.00000556839,1.6339963e-7,0.0018193381,0.0000029410508,0.00062947563,0.06738399,0.13131094,0.000058203004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081770895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019935372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9175309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021700233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052551863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221102024","doi":"","title":"Improving the Potential of Tort Law for Redressing Historical Abuse Claims: The Need for a Contextualized Approach to the Limitation Defence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Tort; Dignity; Law; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Autonomy; Sociology; Abuse of power; Criminology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.024079421313549728,"score_gpt":0.2932727310826629,"score_spread":0.26919330976911315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221102024","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22075564,0.0007822098,0.73393476,0.038874283,0.0006403801,0.0029204278,0.00001258135,0.000038096157,0.0020416495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962996,0.000057548787,0.0014468334,0.0003228116,0.0008852754,0.00018344639,0.0000019346712,0.000011529526,0.00079097674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984485,0.00011122467,0.0002572624,0.00013440127,0.00026874573,0.00077986636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989072,0.00036546195,0.00024303581,0.00019301476,0.00023917263,0.00005207668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038702288,0.000077243494,0.0001066919,0.00001860171,0.0023337915,0.0001547591,0.00064748636,0.00006484182,0.0000013179897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031753394,0.00003932657,0.00016157699,0.00015308108,0.00016567025,0.00013188453,0.000023622115,0.0007106793,8.7131275e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065668464,0.000039948165,0.000008435562,0.000002775546,0.000025768177,1.3836022e-8,0.0062879254,0.000060193048,0.0070058214,0.97773767,0.00035310767,0.00841266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001718857,0.0003872974,0.0001788214,0.00001892404,0.00033042202,0.000047744856,0.08493163,0.0074035707,0.00059455645,0.32539412,0.57861453,0.00037952152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001520312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009800493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.775544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004259804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010226805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211739506","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book II","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.01973903706394781,"score_gpt":0.2897390159004482,"score_spread":0.2699999788365004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211739506","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3226318,0.00068275165,0.0012520896,0.65191126,0.00036782454,0.000365222,0.0000044938383,0.00002821505,0.022756362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98776335,0.00040554258,0.000028717555,0.0013392294,0.0017930283,0.000008608136,0.000001283742,0.000005554781,0.008654671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987764,0.00011544403,0.00013600606,0.00008353785,0.0002774242,0.00061121455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953777,0.000064442414,0.00008280321,0.0001263187,0.00010347617,0.00008517061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022937832,0.00005307164,0.000074341486,0.000030647516,0.0006785347,0.000038071303,0.00024669943,0.000027405797,0.00008109712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020294817,0.000035867528,0.000038927636,0.00015303674,0.00010275393,0.00010229971,0.00003534405,0.00053045194,0.00004580128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029402743,0.000043098375,0.0000893539,2.7621357e-7,0.000019665718,5.428387e-8,0.0061169397,0.000042233693,0.00005830155,0.9523796,0.03896788,0.0022532106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016759883,0.00021595505,0.0000327512,0.0000023132059,0.000008389032,0.0000040246887,0.009436971,0.000002782715,0.00019844582,0.08465989,0.90522754,0.000043347576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012722176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011021553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8677197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057268917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010611705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6150285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213204439","doi":"","title":"Conceptualising the rights of a lessee under the personal property securities regime: The challenge of 'new learning' for Australian lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Personal property; Collateral; Lease; Statutory law; Project commissioning; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Publishing; Law and economics; Settlor; Business; Property (philosophy); Law; Common law; Property law; Property rights; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.11436841202167895,"score_gpt":0.27733304086971866,"score_spread":0.1629646288480397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213204439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7136058,0.0010810512,0.0035101862,0.10617307,0.00031531512,0.0015817577,0.00011221612,0.000052551255,0.17356801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98605967,0.00006976979,0.0002376271,0.00003604217,0.00014653798,1.4835918e-7,6.642815e-7,0.0000041167987,0.013445445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991669,0.000157382,0.0001435973,0.000090326605,0.00027067808,0.00017108444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991724,0.00012517303,0.00033610172,0.00011867699,0.00016690331,0.000080783124],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047504695,0.0000728958,0.00013466284,0.00001764021,0.001893454,0.000025916235,0.0005967392,0.000059137175,0.00021623171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017063903,0.000035641882,0.00017486999,0.00008728257,0.0015773177,0.00013613091,0.00005198696,0.0002497336,0.0000015339157],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005083844,0.000024086876,0.00008753774,0.000009441613,0.000071184244,5.9627286e-7,0.47733536,0.00003013221,0.000015339592,0.5200253,0.0020435965,0.00030656383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043770694,0.00007503331,0.00041185407,0.000062067,0.000095612224,0.0000032620856,0.55152124,0.000022643277,0.00008248504,0.012952852,0.43426275,0.000072493785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029522553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0182559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5070725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033388962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002551596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213989475","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5214","title":"Informal Land Titles: Snowden v Baker (1844)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Statutory law; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); High Court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014406159355908586,"score_gpt":0.26081987261241735,"score_spread":0.24641371325650877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213989475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020580685,0.0017715312,0.00026237988,0.003608467,0.00069738703,0.00054703164,0.00003191751,0.000101007456,0.9723996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9000327,0.07521946,0.0034032525,0.0010786806,0.0010674979,0.0000014579645,0.00004637154,0.00002200134,0.01912857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994429,0.00002969734,0.00010993843,0.00010282343,0.00018114751,0.00013354345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946606,0.000043271182,0.000099769095,0.0001884288,0.00010572728,0.0000967178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035880864,0.00005914694,0.00015078705,0.000015691265,0.0003218262,0.000015020252,0.00031222776,0.00007321983,0.0016832862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023650484,0.00006041367,0.00008274555,0.00016500044,0.00020961634,0.0001756007,0.000045993944,0.00014669793,0.00036316592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035127175,0.00003084518,0.0007547886,0.00023907975,0.000014130314,0.0000011596723,0.0011153511,0.0000013126239,0.00007747185,0.99198294,0.0042007803,0.0015786262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008646957,0.0000062305817,0.00011183129,0.00013542386,0.00003243621,2.3828585e-7,0.00007514741,0.000005150633,0.00001826979,0.00018341905,0.99927175,0.000073638694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006607559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011501637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014881821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090902366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216790139","doi":"","title":"Kingstreet Investments: Taking a Pass on the Defence of Passing On","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.060847476666265464,"score_gpt":0.2882164871328169,"score_spread":0.22736901046655142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216790139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6237696,0.000023481187,0.000106257954,0.0045940382,0.000024111921,0.000106581116,0.000004226488,0.000017873075,0.37135386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779993,0.000093269606,0.00045268374,0.0001096757,0.000022217208,2.5477755e-7,5.81894e-7,0.000002664025,0.001518723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994107,0.00006596032,0.000045385463,0.00011106326,0.00024405596,0.00012283887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994544,0.00010733086,0.00017161311,0.00017378414,0.000045978824,0.000046896683],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014220247,0.000050160477,0.000085377374,0.000012069476,0.0006982609,0.0000060270686,0.0002968868,0.00003821498,0.0012456089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049529026,0.00004701177,0.000055793877,0.000073184754,0.0003585027,0.00015713983,0.000049822334,0.00005847812,0.000010459362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004663957,0.00020288248,0.004827682,0.000010709999,0.000042726926,0.0000071980417,0.13602771,0.00007448153,0.0011727018,0.84385896,0.0019036744,0.011824617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053659047,0.00019620669,0.81122833,0.00016860159,0.00004274839,7.402731e-7,0.13372134,0.00027334163,0.0005155515,0.0009169098,0.052133076,0.00026655968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21053144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047006715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84294206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016636672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007763335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218134711","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1366242","title":"Judicial Independence and the Politics of Depoliticization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Judicial independence; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Judicial activism; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.008714457242379823,"score_gpt":0.28881116306605037,"score_spread":0.2800967058236705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218134711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8543427,0.0036586288,0.024412172,0.050399166,0.00013174655,0.00041189676,0.0000035325866,0.00003598493,0.066604175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678713,0.0021019701,0.000029666977,0.00022555448,0.0003054141,8.982597e-7,2.6282748e-7,0.0000020988143,0.0005469993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988327,0.00008940072,0.00013809938,0.000053232518,0.00022405604,0.00066250167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996656,0.000058072706,0.000093939685,0.000055944474,0.000081597136,0.0000447991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013609836,0.00003683578,0.00006939318,0.000023567522,0.0005982226,0.00003739607,0.00015281675,0.000038793663,0.000005266663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014411334,0.000025972311,0.00003081353,0.00011170299,0.00022917353,0.00009226575,0.000009684954,0.00045302973,0.000001498783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005116477,0.000009939007,0.00029940603,3.0081853e-7,0.000005735408,6.917827e-8,0.0010931455,0.0000040374116,0.000021552427,0.99470687,0.0000070542574,0.0038467874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003033276,0.000035377805,0.0016663729,0.0000035195776,0.000015887224,0.000015512449,0.0037061193,0.000037118385,0.000032473105,0.99203616,0.0021133428,0.000034775232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012881687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019291013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14244443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014870113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013384625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46011052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218884785","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of the Extraterritorial Mareva Injunction in Canada: Three Issues","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Federalism; Position (finance); Balance (ability); Exclusive jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.005348079234409895,"score_gpt":0.2357542079788718,"score_spread":0.23040612874446192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218884785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665,0.0041410825,0.00078107254,0.018878091,0.0018231688,0.00029748265,0.0000035659095,0.000009450051,0.007566108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706453,0.00038764384,0.0000035004357,0.000006462508,0.0013433156,0.0000050743843,2.941262e-7,0.0000032877547,0.0011859112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986683,0.00011023353,0.00018942836,0.00006201906,0.00031270646,0.00065728894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999668,0.00003899439,0.00012081183,0.00009390988,0.000061737825,0.000016549935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011879648,0.000044085045,0.00005374842,0.0000144513515,0.000706291,0.000035952933,0.00028687506,0.000030416144,0.0000063209195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000390324,0.000026213269,0.000038171736,0.00021417285,0.00007389451,0.00008421265,0.000017192531,0.0005102656,0.0000011203471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009584419,0.000010592259,0.029016038,4.6425475e-7,0.0000055190276,6.6093925e-8,0.000073586736,0.00008514626,0.00011563289,0.96770597,0.00053533923,0.0024420915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021861956,0.000022871327,0.10504741,0.000009256442,0.00001053236,0.000004342884,0.0055862796,0.00006560269,0.00004877462,0.7822075,0.1067077,0.00007110442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98850846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18549843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005380249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012025118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222022887","doi":"","title":"The Enron Pension Jigsaw: Assembling Accountable Corporate Governance by Fiduciaries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Pension; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Business; Accounting; Shareholder; Pension fund; Investment (military); Duty; Control (management); Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science; Law; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.040623449978463656,"score_gpt":0.30070219889471994,"score_spread":0.26007874891625626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222022887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122239776,0.001043395,0.0015077225,0.013619694,0.00040193013,0.00039494204,0.00001527671,0.0001350596,0.8606422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428292,0.00072033925,0.00026930266,0.0003223072,0.0000621865,0.000018114803,0.000002569227,0.000005918446,0.05577008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916714,0.000068647554,0.000117141404,0.00014637191,0.0002529568,0.00024775558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939984,0.00017244199,0.00012266844,0.00017577379,0.00007581066,0.00005346926],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006653756,0.00006087986,0.00006094931,0.000003856525,0.0018375469,0.00030953877,0.00020393368,0.000046184796,0.00020637564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022017461,0.00004157274,0.000027186023,0.00019495522,0.00012767906,0.00024671305,0.000025577352,0.00008920103,0.00013843016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014603007,0.000013952887,0.0008247037,7.183755e-7,0.0000024039803,1.5258163e-7,0.00025396698,0.000008263594,0.00075564,0.9346301,0.06274935,0.0007592723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054022465,0.0000041473977,0.0004971916,0.000002784075,0.0000028753336,1.8982612e-7,0.0010103799,0.000034735902,0.0015898751,0.008684164,0.9880466,0.000073059804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041980175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006751643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92594594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006988833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015817217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222545235","doi":"","title":"Private Law Responses to Domestic Violence: The Intersection of Family Law and Tort","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Domestic violence; Law; Spouse; Redress; Damages; Harm; Political science; Misconduct; Supreme court; Poison control; Liability; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.01333438866778492,"score_gpt":0.319522238131186,"score_spread":0.3061878494634011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222545235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97611344,0.0005220157,0.0021483034,0.0053911386,0.000066746485,0.00017184512,0.0000014047147,0.00001718455,0.0155679025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754137,0.00096913014,0.00006583943,0.00093633356,0.00015589788,0.0000035069475,1.7356159e-7,0.0000033717715,0.000324405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988776,0.000103279584,0.00015209182,0.00009359152,0.00018806997,0.00058540294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999642,0.00006718065,0.00007470626,0.00009521361,0.000056235836,0.000064635526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014413903,0.00005579313,0.000076699565,0.000021202726,0.00060823216,0.00006329735,0.00020895684,0.00003344263,0.0000040073905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057169516,0.000039383256,0.000037878566,0.00016191186,0.00015623057,0.000119001386,0.000019568168,0.00042377642,0.000004985409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003459305,0.000015793525,0.000085187276,4.7542056e-7,0.000008392021,2.6974814e-7,0.0009227434,0.000005081816,0.001556336,0.9889553,0.0000099975705,0.008405801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017158726,0.00036507327,0.005355819,0.000036433685,0.00002081273,0.00003906129,0.005554632,0.000008147174,0.0001916083,0.9451568,0.043006744,0.00009328962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015810095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056860354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043798536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028422818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004990923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46780914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222910444","doi":"","title":"The Strict Character of Fiduciary Liability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Prudence; Liability; Law and economics; Character (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Business; Strict liability; Limited liability; Unintended consequences; Law; Economics; Political science; Duty; Accounting; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0066898590433361466,"score_gpt":0.26776454774162994,"score_spread":0.2610746886982938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222910444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9300935,0.0015971051,0.00065985834,0.013737202,0.000167823,0.00019833402,0.0000044926173,0.000024297218,0.053517364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927129,0.0015305647,0.00001405365,0.000023741,0.0005700052,0.0000039450633,8.078433e-7,0.000003914676,0.0051400503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844813,0.00014221297,0.00019559418,0.000075159434,0.00022817393,0.0009107497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947625,0.00015278568,0.00013407174,0.000121652156,0.00008406144,0.00003117305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032624085,0.000045772093,0.00006486025,0.000016315431,0.000863461,0.000052602805,0.00029542876,0.00003681987,0.000023934017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009159299,0.000030548945,0.00007925657,0.00016174166,0.00014311922,0.000104968385,0.000018532206,0.00059412094,0.000012642755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006211194,0.000036918227,0.0032916474,5.1646737e-7,0.000009914865,7.652791e-8,0.0001429993,0.0000037632574,0.00012855654,0.98743385,0.00020713866,0.008738407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001149702,0.000033099954,0.031442728,0.0000025506624,0.000011512571,0.000004641207,0.0016994211,0.000009291377,0.00007586941,0.58887017,0.37767068,0.00006506752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024529214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013515068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39856368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035462115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016445362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7541725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223518421","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495243.004","title":"Property, personality and unfair competition in England and Wales, Australia and Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Statutory law; Law; Intangible property; Political science; Supreme court; Ingenuity; Unfair competition; Legislative history; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.035400331544188854,"score_gpt":0.23134317872317517,"score_spread":0.1959428471789863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223518421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07626845,0.000115142335,0.0000035860903,0.0004481823,0.000028403709,0.00038689384,0.00027555772,0.000020577878,0.9224532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2628618,0.00028396424,0.00002207092,0.00003488472,0.00008270799,6.673489e-7,0.000017036644,0.0000064453525,0.73669046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925107,0.000041643205,0.00009129288,0.00029331836,0.000159981,0.00016268104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995779,0.00004169762,0.000066057444,0.00010275169,0.00004782136,0.00016377069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000120755234,0.00014036697,0.00017555349,0.000038652637,0.00032279725,0.000052985797,0.00010595273,0.00015337105,0.0000057894636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005298225,0.00013926416,0.000017765213,0.00000529658,0.0004215095,0.00007357537,0.0001282124,0.00022970773,3.8057425e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015346732,0.000004214826,0.00049032364,0.00004721731,0.000014716306,0.000025308533,0.0006207053,3.0196497e-7,0.0000038168187,0.9963343,0.0014400864,0.001003625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032783515,0.0000079438,0.003959171,0.00005894351,0.00003328121,0.000003879305,0.00016252737,0.000009404156,0.0000024936294,0.000016358184,0.99522924,0.0001888892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8568261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83830214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023018589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023320322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56790274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224385200","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.015","title":"The compatibility of the trust with the civil law notion of property","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.026969559456691602,"score_gpt":0.21265422617623528,"score_spread":0.18568466671954367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224385200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017844045,0.00002448249,0.00003880111,0.00067036477,0.000048195623,0.0009648014,0.00010041689,0.000017634633,0.9963509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31546244,0.000019879999,0.0000068205895,0.000029306704,0.000035179335,0.0000016297497,0.0000019828917,0.000006610576,0.68443614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999074,0.00011813819,0.000135985,0.00018163091,0.0003524927,0.00013776601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985037,0.0001443818,0.0003478932,0.00064707757,0.00031269022,0.000044292214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002818498,0.0001227344,0.00016903204,0.000010280314,0.0011296641,0.000035712183,0.000931583,0.00011492218,0.000006055425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000993246,0.000052332838,0.00012985308,0.000015130314,0.002614255,0.00005535136,0.00024653992,0.0002654078,0.0000026064718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001970991,0.000008734112,0.000010105989,0.000018287708,0.000037001482,2.1657809e-7,0.0006660504,0.000003801378,0.000017301852,0.9943955,0.004378441,0.0004448565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011750049,0.00001728834,0.00034214742,0.00004741039,0.000088845234,2.1987654e-7,0.00043984895,0.000024738516,0.00013147049,0.000062424326,0.99864095,0.00008714875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016949924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044979174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008897517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019280883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224405444","doi":"","title":"Punishing Contract Breakers: Whiten v Pilot Insurance and the Sea Change in Canadian Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Te Mata Koi : Auckland University Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Tort; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Law and economics; Malice; Business; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.0374745736079705,"score_gpt":0.27500955051536646,"score_spread":0.23753497690739597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224405444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085324146,0.034013342,0.000014176049,0.21733084,0.00013150137,0.003479833,0.0005811915,0.00014248272,0.6589825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742847,0.01996651,0.000023955594,0.0054947026,0.00004728112,0.00000408145,0.0000135281825,0.0000045101706,0.00016074163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999151,0.00015390324,0.000107480766,0.00017105642,0.00012906778,0.00028748784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994357,0.00007363221,0.00006156077,0.00019678728,0.000035155965,0.00019711578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007643632,0.00008755272,0.00021065195,0.000022742288,0.0007737549,0.000085524334,0.00033846113,0.0000410275,0.00004572234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002586986,0.000069669906,0.000038664035,0.00028117478,0.00037898344,0.00042290337,0.000059396276,0.00015570238,0.00001940469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006879229,0.000012958557,0.0022461838,0.00009381394,0.000005388627,0.000014782386,0.0012524026,5.23996e-7,2.3097866e-7,0.99496907,0.000090236164,0.0013075324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006975301,0.000007743774,0.00757012,0.0005256566,0.000027373962,0.0000027789201,0.00018874764,0.0000026910218,3.5201722e-7,0.00095649407,0.9899127,0.00010780991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9758162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002135913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016225161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5951175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W222559358","doi":"","title":"Justifying the Law of Unjust Enrichment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Restitution; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02342716744782826,"score_gpt":0.31869361267601937,"score_spread":0.2952664452281911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W222559358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36988798,0.0055384436,0.0134124765,0.059629515,0.00040322915,0.00049072434,0.0000029911225,0.00006681474,0.5505678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99103767,0.004956918,0.000028362525,0.00017810625,0.00036066043,0.0000041513113,3.078301e-7,0.000004552433,0.0034292508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985359,0.00007516287,0.00015258107,0.00006870633,0.00025159828,0.00091610267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996284,0.00005390918,0.000105154875,0.00010327683,0.00006226951,0.000046951398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016966832,0.00004740694,0.00006431829,0.000017448361,0.0009060961,0.000044404645,0.00032236613,0.000030158008,0.000065546184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026969048,0.000031993917,0.000063113745,0.00019976257,0.00014710748,0.0001233137,0.000023348835,0.00060218346,0.000020215477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034129998,0.000022852553,0.00029436,5.8667314e-7,0.000017528148,2.768759e-7,0.0011639592,0.000020861022,0.000091698406,0.9926599,0.000056106448,0.0056684213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018749262,0.00004935404,0.000304963,0.000007098954,0.000034060973,0.000034929057,0.025920253,0.000017152746,0.000042535055,0.38599208,0.5873295,0.0000805692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002482418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014872002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6211497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037172114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009400839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82989264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225736545","doi":"","title":"The Duty to Consult and Accommodate: Procedural Justice as Aboriginal Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Procedural justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Government (linguistics); Procedural law; Due process; Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Psychology; Municipal law; Geography","score_opus":0.011559240527301774,"score_gpt":0.32038238733454477,"score_spread":0.308823146807243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225736545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7997554,0.000057488327,0.000017994991,0.025430188,0.00045760974,0.00048228123,0.000020063486,0.00010210977,0.1736769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899781,0.000032150452,0.0006652059,0.00176689,0.0006559709,0.00007966948,0.000002677913,0.000007654956,0.0068116975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897116,0.0000495193,0.0001488315,0.00023260822,0.00026271222,0.00033514178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989542,0.00019947998,0.000051574327,0.00027810628,0.00014130729,0.0003753512],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044394739,0.000099476325,0.000091845985,0.000012806251,0.002696731,0.00046398054,0.0004262345,0.00008231876,0.00019411194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020958536,0.00006876129,0.000027699152,0.00020263036,0.0004118757,0.00025214467,0.00006179807,0.00035772764,0.00072181126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011243305,0.000018410536,0.00033461262,0.00000377775,0.0000042194815,0.0000012963358,0.0007638516,7.065422e-7,0.00057079364,0.99218327,0.005647182,0.00046065543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014037284,0.000013595344,0.0022538996,0.0000051662314,0.00002020109,0.000003448122,0.00050306565,0.000008409674,0.0003227121,0.016561832,0.98004824,0.000119054304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015118284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09389047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9756214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026808364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023373093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226278872","doi":"","title":"The Concept and Conceptions of Intellectual Property as Seen Through the Lens of Property","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Phenomenon; Property law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Property rights; Public law","score_opus":0.024303659435860096,"score_gpt":0.29716919400220015,"score_spread":0.27286553456634005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226278872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.612802,0.020196017,0.0134542985,0.20146313,0.0003485411,0.0025955713,0.000028366658,0.00008334509,0.14902867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98358464,0.011026778,0.00003855989,0.000099984405,0.00013676363,0.000010162876,4.3719166e-7,0.000006401791,0.005096268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858904,0.00013805492,0.00024076119,0.00009718816,0.0002582168,0.0006767203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993382,0.00016778562,0.00016174419,0.00013604092,0.00016308692,0.000033158987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010114522,0.00007179334,0.000109538145,0.0000109164,0.0012883819,0.00003749527,0.0003728697,0.000044661992,0.000030272382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028551434,0.000026865691,0.0000691608,0.00019237695,0.0012406043,0.00016623667,0.000047520934,0.00067214563,0.000007132351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001297458,0.000035120487,0.0000357419,9.642449e-7,0.000050289924,6.981985e-8,0.028184235,0.000043728156,0.00034557877,0.9650079,0.00015838917,0.006124983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056580425,0.00040410034,0.00013820575,0.000028409322,0.000050852228,0.000048644917,0.09644968,0.000010143266,0.000713143,0.37818736,0.5232803,0.00012336856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055682617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008996112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5868206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022394067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003114475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99093217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227159011","doi":"","title":"Coercive Relief - Reflections on Supervision and Enforcement Constraints","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Scope (computer science); Remedial education; Orthodoxy; Preference; Law and economics; Political science; Law enforcement; Empirical research; Law; Business; Economics; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.13852183605349747,"score_gpt":0.4004734201286882,"score_spread":0.2619515840751907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227159011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94575495,0.000015951013,0.000103534345,0.0017750588,0.00004777543,0.00033233655,0.000011208982,0.000024334367,0.051934835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803535,0.00019767194,0.00023355566,0.000012212588,0.00006993196,0.0000013617688,0.0000037259008,0.000003782225,0.019124297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879605,0.00025394486,0.00009120497,0.00023866288,0.00038631368,0.00023383419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931186,0.00013815344,0.000050085284,0.00015577684,0.00015701917,0.00018712488],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006814676,0.00006438268,0.00011107453,0.00008514288,0.0014953796,0.000072407835,0.00016358357,0.00009640859,0.000081262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029203096,0.00006655521,0.000031141608,0.00013946163,0.001289243,0.00015154094,0.00011410856,0.0002142806,0.000015635884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018584545,0.00036971635,0.03278034,0.00022654391,0.000092754046,0.000029894969,0.03892314,0.000021870153,0.026668286,0.8848571,0.004062232,0.011782267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020978802,0.0020044711,0.18615559,0.00057974254,0.00008337279,0.000026562255,0.12171691,0.00032106604,0.013190087,0.0037966403,0.6693585,0.0006691832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008191154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003115214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8810605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051061743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006172509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227516896","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1138","title":"Peoples, BCE, and the Good Corporate \"Citizen\"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Expansive; Corporation; Law; Deference; Statutory law; Discretion; Legislature; Corporate law; Shareholder; Corporate title; Political science; Corporate governance; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02470828335850687,"score_gpt":0.27540565853192944,"score_spread":0.25069737517342255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227516896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007796063,0.0004798701,0.00039169693,0.03108171,0.000099788755,0.00015705707,0.0000053690414,0.000034715977,0.9599537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946989,0.0008605038,0.00051569403,0.0013841051,0.0005057615,0.0000037608943,0.0000010636074,0.000005377267,0.0020248361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990031,0.00016496185,0.00018794945,0.00011417397,0.00027510463,0.00025470866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992872,0.00012653985,0.00019733065,0.00012793923,0.000081679864,0.0001793262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009678583,0.00008059959,0.00012592162,0.000015517528,0.0021891822,0.00042295683,0.00028167025,0.000054501277,0.00011460015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005536202,0.000052675194,0.00006878732,0.00012738549,0.000381436,0.00018986646,0.00002703044,0.00028025697,0.000036630096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001302468,0.000020940784,0.00011744995,7.744089e-7,0.000007272953,0.0000032297708,0.0011969921,0.0000047722206,0.000033987057,0.99550146,0.0008030777,0.0022970473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010301378,0.00003351307,0.0027704565,0.000017758115,0.000028013274,0.00005869171,0.0014965885,0.000036918882,0.000029785942,0.8362703,0.15809493,0.00013292955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01015943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08082452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98690283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003273136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010308364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229243899","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.013","title":"The framing of a European law of trusts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.02696284383109111,"score_gpt":0.22713926985631874,"score_spread":0.20017642602522764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229243899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022764351,0.000082013576,0.00005923148,0.000043176427,0.000056599598,0.00028827813,0.000080812104,0.00002734656,0.9991349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0625283,0.00014232131,0.000042694857,0.000016485888,0.00008544899,3.0676478e-7,0.0000036045606,0.000014080488,0.93716675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924535,0.00007202513,0.00015631429,0.00015804716,0.00022314563,0.0001451014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989777,0.0001279499,0.00029243022,0.00034343387,0.00018229897,0.00007614968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021671165,0.000107035085,0.00016913103,0.000027749289,0.00049728266,0.00002787939,0.0006361233,0.00010838625,0.000007762938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000113973165,0.00009810404,0.0001346924,0.000007168913,0.0009856332,0.000048588536,0.00023789177,0.00019088248,0.000012759633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005048946,0.0000036035128,5.748693e-7,0.000017059967,0.000033771455,0.0000029133196,0.00038950966,4.656061e-7,0.0000315261,0.994791,0.0033213329,0.0014032511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000872504,0.000009807444,0.00001935523,0.000052796564,0.000053176784,1.8595188e-7,0.00026670808,0.0000042044217,0.000102012884,0.00007663098,0.9992298,0.000098087934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004653699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010563072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99590844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005133357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008584546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70350325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229554846","doi":"10.29173/alr1257","title":"Supreme Court Restates Directors' Fiduciary Duty - A Comment on Peoples Department Stores v. Wise","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Supreme court; Law; Duty; Shareholder; Corporation; Corporate law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Business judgment rule; Sociology; Economics; Corporate governance; Management","score_opus":0.04065132440687232,"score_gpt":0.32385266370803756,"score_spread":0.28320133930116526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229554846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01296442,0.034775916,0.00000962442,0.80155224,0.00017752037,0.0023852556,0.00007960149,0.00015104379,0.14790437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7695014,0.1119723,0.00018020305,0.11628728,0.0004018597,0.00042731635,0.0001156178,0.00003320862,0.001080831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852985,0.00024401514,0.000292412,0.0003158979,0.00033361503,0.00028417987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864316,0.0006268053,0.00010919707,0.00029855294,0.00004749434,0.00027480352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003127666,0.00015428102,0.00030423177,0.000007488656,0.0004997272,0.00006252216,0.00034380265,0.000039863706,0.00059478014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034024497,0.0001260722,0.00013324842,0.00020793412,0.00013517242,0.00011249109,0.00008349065,0.00011857241,0.00047455507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009521615,0.00016677157,0.000915551,0.00049875973,0.00004193375,0.0000033437466,0.0031077322,0.0000039178058,0.0000092692435,0.7042465,0.28911182,0.0018848462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087005246,0.000045063996,0.00035963982,0.00054497994,0.000058784004,2.5215843e-7,0.0000921463,0.0000065238446,0.000038820745,0.00017137689,0.99843794,0.00015743976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039471064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061024643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75653696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008397509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011076007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9669252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230719886","doi":"","title":"혼합법계의 발견과 주요 혼합법계 국가의 법체계","year":2008,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"외법논집","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Jurisdiction; Private law; Common law; Comparative law; Political science; Public law; Legal history; Possession (linguistics); Sovereignty; Municipal law; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05433233463430178,"score_gpt":0.3195578343718433,"score_spread":0.26522549973754156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230719886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46239933,0.00081401964,0.0002436201,0.01795593,0.0007939183,0.0004922027,0.000070123635,0.00018482926,0.51704603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368465,0.0009517276,0.0002851603,0.00080746744,0.0011341639,0.000028690218,0.000008514052,0.000017856155,0.059919935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983279,0.000087653025,0.00027646977,0.00036497318,0.00044046933,0.0005025399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990556,0.000084628504,0.000117460666,0.00039795114,0.000089724635,0.00025459946],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026823647,0.00016145509,0.00020404071,0.000038361497,0.0014231518,0.000086436085,0.0004871688,0.00017331401,0.001879969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074127136,0.00015817236,0.0001524267,0.00050706253,0.00048808794,0.00020188709,0.00012577501,0.00025319282,0.0049282108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023501732,0.00078899035,0.030934496,0.000049202044,0.000110671186,0.00006218348,0.05064397,0.000058257774,0.0010034284,0.72382575,0.17373449,0.018765064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020773127,0.00003069513,0.019623678,0.000014665644,0.000022035192,0.000005369799,0.0011122363,0.00009966228,0.00017415515,0.0018808574,0.9765851,0.00024380504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050080805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079106004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8028506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010101707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003051102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230968116","doi":"","title":"The personal property security interest: Identifying some essential attributes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law in context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Statutory law; Acknowledgement; Database transaction; Argument (complex analysis); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Project commissioning; Personal property; Common law; Publishing; Business; Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05614441770730251,"score_gpt":0.32738267820091127,"score_spread":0.2712382604936088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230968116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.818323,0.00074300735,0.00043110442,0.06553932,0.001009496,0.00082550006,0.000023110006,0.0001515845,0.11295386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693847,0.000039933802,0.000010093903,0.0006571818,0.00041423365,0.0000384704,0.0000021914702,0.0000052023674,0.0018942236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991159,0.00015916431,0.00015416731,0.00015750769,0.00016794982,0.0002453484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995273,0.00018733088,0.000049587303,0.00012909586,0.000049281654,0.000057426492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007931975,0.00006132972,0.0000863852,0.000008810384,0.0009395657,0.00025463488,0.00029049753,0.00005012079,0.00006296505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014792038,0.00003706327,0.00005393539,0.0000899042,0.00037566051,0.00022222952,0.000087550936,0.00016559468,0.00010433026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037017862,0.00002264774,0.00038864638,0.000004119749,0.0000041117314,4.5413867e-7,0.0061154803,2.3791384e-7,0.00016314807,0.9884197,0.00089631515,0.003981433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018322954,0.00000869252,0.0005923818,0.0000242447,0.0000039743563,3.631675e-7,0.003576718,0.00040572643,0.000319439,0.03805904,0.9567321,0.00009411501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009476353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12969276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95583576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005543915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004612571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231547810","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v43i1.5412","title":"The State of Judicial Scrutiny of Public Contracting in New Zealand and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Procurement; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Public administration; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Public law; Government procurement; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.023303310904248944,"score_gpt":0.2576232751249873,"score_spread":0.23431996422073834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231547810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86097544,0.06090115,0.0001515595,0.024400579,0.00076817034,0.0015113531,0.000075365344,0.00002374621,0.051192615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640924,0.03540939,0.000063000734,0.000035875168,0.00005152762,6.892052e-8,0.0000010368692,0.000001930761,0.00034481712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993688,0.00010276324,0.00016326769,0.000057124962,0.0001626376,0.00014542836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992845,0.00022084096,0.0002428793,0.000084787935,0.000078403966,0.0000885956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085373275,0.000039007027,0.00017322451,0.000010592854,0.0001682822,0.0000049294545,0.00015790729,0.000019480403,0.0000198443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074695694,0.000034654677,0.00002737322,0.00014983166,0.00016442231,0.00011192891,0.000029933415,0.000061987455,4.1674744e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019103949,0.00007506872,0.038600355,0.00046346858,0.000050874885,6.8159227e-7,0.0054226993,0.0000050010367,0.00011964989,0.9303828,0.0032467165,0.021613607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010629486,0.0000047141057,0.0013473144,0.00020048303,0.00001939565,6.9068825e-8,0.00032308817,0.0000020174448,0.00003235745,0.00023531474,0.9976939,0.000035063913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9240559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92244536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046675174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004662203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14131767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232708363","doi":"","title":"Governor in Council Appointments: During Pleasure or Just a Big Headache?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Pleasure; Law; Hostility; Legitimacy; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Psychology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.08009486195053896,"score_gpt":0.29729269359291216,"score_spread":0.21719783164237322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232708363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761508,0.0013935688,0.00021837701,0.0060344096,0.00011531621,0.0002383713,0.00000481174,0.000046279114,0.01579805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681867,0.0073674372,0.000042735075,0.00009770613,0.0005718983,0.000017345894,7.1655927e-7,0.000013944554,0.023701524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697614,0.00009984403,0.00025916297,0.00018048432,0.0007624197,0.0017219639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994613,0.00003655076,0.00011955508,0.00012743895,0.00013078535,0.0001243742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017964859,0.00011016186,0.00014617965,0.00003546486,0.0010215082,0.000052929183,0.00032135384,0.000080108155,0.000069341186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021175263,0.00009188886,0.000078285266,0.00039240476,0.00011227535,0.00020744857,0.00003146791,0.0011826952,0.00006902698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078546896,0.0014557078,0.06638602,0.000042819112,0.00037476906,0.0002172588,0.04223295,0.0002648683,0.002188169,0.8636803,0.003936077,0.018435614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005819241,0.00045979902,0.03885817,0.00010912502,0.00006787425,0.0014917293,0.061336055,0.00006511982,0.00014960948,0.07077941,0.819839,0.0010248658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005212072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17984287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81590295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065565365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144967865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233657759","doi":"10.7202/1059314ar","title":"Administrative Delicts: A Case Study in Unlawful Municipal Administration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Business; Public administration; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05090888517934041,"score_gpt":0.3551519780356721,"score_spread":0.3042430928563317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233657759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92776936,0.000016115942,0.000023054516,0.0007498514,0.00005538515,0.00095769204,0.000015347716,0.000046075613,0.070367105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713236,0.0000130889875,0.00018025168,0.00008234815,0.0001442003,0.00010936218,0.00000853719,0.000010899416,0.0023189392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988219,0.00015869545,0.00027035188,0.00027756303,0.00015916096,0.00031229056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993001,0.00011964893,0.00009249173,0.00030217963,0.000051968633,0.00013356275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058825314,0.0000785273,0.00016239894,0.000059138805,0.00019892927,0.000091012334,0.00022716686,0.00009005012,0.00016050648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079057136,0.00011496736,0.000052990905,0.00038977986,0.00006423389,0.00020101244,0.00003768824,0.00019613889,0.0001662187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010968609,0.0025226285,0.3226044,0.00007200369,0.00006244735,0.0047409344,0.23852336,0.00029801283,0.0003054386,0.42634398,0.00013930319,0.004277833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004735259,0.0025433155,0.09902429,0.00024572425,0.00015926921,0.0016024619,0.78989536,0.0058258576,0.0003470702,0.03246912,0.061316166,0.0018360945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011336384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10404719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.551372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026328664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030725682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234575015","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2007.11424324","title":"Enforcement of Foreign Non-Monetary Judgments in Canada (And Beyond)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Choice of law; Payment; Common law; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Conflict of laws; Finance","score_opus":0.013112616779021393,"score_gpt":0.283167650151595,"score_spread":0.27005503337257364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234575015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7758651,0.000032322467,0.0006442651,0.0012485019,0.0003009364,0.00008015237,0.000010461469,0.0000010888907,0.22181718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985045,0.00006581646,0.0007817303,0.0003452122,0.00014721148,6.903279e-7,0.0000018629439,0.0000026799278,0.00015027513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989608,0.000011868204,0.0004022567,0.000050419058,0.00046384495,0.00011080144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942255,0.00007263076,0.0002682826,0.00004324758,0.00012000057,0.000073315925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061210565,0.000042049895,0.00009317744,0.000058675683,0.000048540634,0.000014060191,0.00023840292,0.000020569694,0.00010919361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030362275,0.000037757858,0.000029653143,0.000067759116,0.000057726986,0.00016509782,0.000042519336,0.00009518568,6.7921826e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003036508,0.000040825373,0.039811905,0.0000036609429,0.00003686284,0.000016786791,0.00057375635,0.00015499727,0.0004198623,0.95679367,0.00021996777,0.0018973601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023749028,0.00015415346,0.20715661,0.00018302511,0.00003733371,0.000024618093,0.0048853075,0.0004896268,0.009143536,0.1111593,0.6640632,0.0003283397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6860995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83254397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84563434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003570251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028624697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31599078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234604469","doi":"","title":"A growing good faith in contracts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Good faith; Law; Faith; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02355135947674829,"score_gpt":0.2609068767667628,"score_spread":0.23735551729001447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234604469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89398855,0.000026971235,0.00031715407,0.009442529,0.000029669725,0.00014636038,0.0000047442077,0.000106588865,0.09593742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738795,0.00003675431,0.0015423617,0.000023592007,0.000011997316,3.6998412e-7,0.0000010271789,0.000002809856,0.0009931216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941385,0.000029978064,0.00008292466,0.00016016314,0.00012612624,0.00018697658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995803,0.000023893965,0.00006596006,0.00017563112,0.00007796874,0.00007625121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029795722,0.000054043394,0.00012969354,0.00017473631,0.00013068653,0.0000072346375,0.0003585196,0.00016167139,0.000037169022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104266976,0.00006200973,0.00003081589,0.00040971392,0.00029601133,0.00016199765,0.00011964889,0.0001644201,0.000057109253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032904023,0.00015777681,0.21977104,0.0000059064164,0.0000225602,0.000048470556,0.004589426,0.000031111966,0.0004169422,0.7610074,0.0005771323,0.013339323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015166001,0.000042973654,0.07504139,0.00004351775,0.000018893505,0.0000019557049,0.03303599,0.000055279706,0.0005212666,0.024486624,0.865025,0.00021049878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068520717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005809934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001007037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015334549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2234768318","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139856478.015","title":"Cy-près as a class action remedy – justly maligned or just misunderstood?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Class action; Action (physics); Philosophy; Law; History; Epistemology; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.11305660805323185,"score_gpt":0.2958397335348814,"score_spread":0.18278312548164954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234768318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005641791,0.000034266137,0.00016890564,0.0005792881,0.0003349102,0.0010718612,0.00012482141,0.00028939455,0.9968324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008015903,0.0003321356,0.00012477636,0.00024271852,0.00049475214,0.0000057687794,0.000049086306,0.00005165957,0.9906832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998,0.000087146545,0.00023832616,0.00064575515,0.0005592658,0.0004694656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820477,0.00011116398,0.0003510809,0.0006397113,0.00029921037,0.00039404305],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019323955,0.00036433738,0.00037840617,0.00015520961,0.0012062496,0.0001925819,0.00087384984,0.0006991107,0.00022597842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035550987,0.0003954308,0.00026131698,0.000027552089,0.0005996022,0.00026181492,0.00032487785,0.0005258763,0.00045617745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007149018,0.000015443105,4.545501e-7,0.000045305096,0.00008808179,0.000054268476,0.00045708008,0.0000010326613,0.00006700978,0.9031287,0.09468464,0.0013864838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040610277,0.000047443264,0.00000938581,0.00007953318,0.00028375757,0.0000056785184,0.0020203823,0.000017413107,0.00008585439,0.00009031481,0.99646515,0.0004889758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008181914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073327497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9030384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007653889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006861625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236579057","doi":"","title":"Causation in equitable compensation: The 'Brickenden' rule in Singapore: Then Khek Koon v Arjun Permanand Samtani [2014] 1 SLR 245","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Academy of Law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Causation; Casebook; Law; Compensation (psychology); Project commissioning; Honesty; Duty; Duty of care; Publishing; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.050697590457553725,"score_gpt":0.33770096256689214,"score_spread":0.2870033721093384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236579057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84198564,0.00054352544,0.00048576717,0.0325497,0.00018971493,0.0004568309,0.000010247602,0.000035207453,0.12374334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790406,0.0001997049,0.00045138056,0.0006270121,0.0005582992,0.000008666851,0.0000052724104,0.000014753074,0.00023085433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757826,0.00044857792,0.0006453486,0.0002168939,0.0006240054,0.0004868889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998907,0.0003082048,0.00045885087,0.00012965316,0.0000752548,0.000121008066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042196754,0.00014250445,0.00026533022,0.00011288199,0.0011600945,0.0001786661,0.00052750425,0.00018581467,0.00022398953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000149435,0.00011074794,0.00008799598,0.00037742427,0.00042967207,0.0005729008,0.00008317567,0.00084487675,0.00002696084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029458562,0.00015778077,0.019052943,0.000022225864,0.000022180326,0.0000036050444,0.02043117,0.0012074353,0.001493049,0.9470764,0.0021525528,0.008351205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001590991,0.00006997885,0.08139433,0.00028916422,0.000057011563,0.000050647126,0.012397208,0.0016387417,0.0009384966,0.35598263,0.54509073,0.0005000531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035039808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00318282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5910938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002510883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012017668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89226264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237135869","doi":"","title":"Mortgage Fraud, the Land Titles Act and Due Diligence: The Rabi v. Rosu Decision","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Appeal; Law; Real estate; Business; Legislative intent; Doctrine; Database transaction; Legislature; Law and economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.016241670940900427,"score_gpt":0.29439014937955943,"score_spread":0.278148478438659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237135869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785815,0.003057409,0.0013234395,0.008359853,0.00008045195,0.0001467099,0.0000013985199,0.00001693948,0.008432309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98338526,0.013287385,0.000019649526,0.00014600372,0.0004024283,0.0000056452395,3.9326687e-7,0.0000063078987,0.002746924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866474,0.00009872228,0.00012477406,0.000101191545,0.00028663865,0.0007239153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994999,0.00019190909,0.00007073692,0.00013922887,0.0000413648,0.000056832807],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015986917,0.00006522828,0.0000701659,0.00001688626,0.0025311029,0.00009707363,0.000357311,0.00004462519,0.000055767083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102388636,0.000032821423,0.00005248246,0.00015417922,0.00025496454,0.00011563652,0.000042157404,0.00081546104,0.000035961566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004586473,0.00009982569,0.10800269,0.0000022373154,0.00011733088,0.000011843824,0.018225007,0.00008161033,0.00013717415,0.7618198,0.0045937537,0.10686291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038468975,0.000084116684,0.1434496,0.00001255221,0.000041264044,0.00044911946,0.007893226,0.00011167118,0.000038736933,0.36729968,0.48002446,0.00021088085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011229991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014556901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4754307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014281974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009710741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237432707","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Contracts: Should Courts Seek the Truth?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Action (physics); Law and economics; Verifiable secret sharing; Law; Political science; Economics; Business; Computer science; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.09076629143971328,"score_gpt":0.3673406532925412,"score_spread":0.2765743618528279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237432707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16625035,0.0000901491,0.000002690184,0.0087845465,0.0001426206,0.00039026837,0.00000899696,0.000035247336,0.8242951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988884,0.0034341922,0.000055810353,0.0002547428,0.00028999167,0.00008444631,0.0000015095536,0.000012872749,0.0069824704],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852145,0.00017915455,0.0002388501,0.00024993566,0.00023852372,0.00057210185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997908,0.001488438,0.000055380468,0.0003493324,0.000057161826,0.00014167443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018964924,0.00007773194,0.0001222813,0.000067110115,0.0008790749,0.00019334913,0.0004972813,0.00009886457,0.0004979101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083458563,0.000064042615,0.00005962687,0.0001445786,0.000468084,0.00017252965,0.00008886121,0.00048461964,0.00007332013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018839568,0.00019499993,0.0028104696,0.000009998637,0.00003886653,0.0000140241955,0.015504184,0.0015119497,0.00016441259,0.4366718,0.0011580911,0.54190236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022085795,0.00001691956,0.0015395543,0.000010716419,0.0000023111972,0.000001376317,0.0057792687,0.005287474,0.000037112888,0.0018059743,0.98518294,0.000115511284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007494262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021881263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003508928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011204913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67612225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240078556","doi":"","title":"Can I Change My Mind? Undoing Trustee Decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Rescission; Fiduciary; Regret; Law and economics; Vesting; Unjust enrichment; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Restitution; Psychology; Duty","score_opus":0.17565714290196013,"score_gpt":0.35670244940615725,"score_spread":0.18104530650419712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240078556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31494313,0.00007405947,0.0004568228,0.017615112,0.00012098008,0.00031366418,0.000010060338,0.00008861631,0.66637754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97963464,0.00011160029,0.0013681537,0.00054910796,0.0003029838,0.00003699815,0.0000016986867,0.0000045198526,0.017990274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937516,0.000024879704,0.00009186493,0.00012417667,0.00018728756,0.0001966098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995715,0.000112410016,0.000023854955,0.00013514454,0.000035964626,0.0001211074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001232502,0.000044749886,0.00006003999,0.000028650311,0.00094317907,0.00002698551,0.00017384198,0.000041437994,0.00072099647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073253206,0.00003851389,0.000040441126,0.00023799778,0.00011998054,0.00009780037,0.000037142687,0.000056122662,0.00026068962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022489314,0.00008652266,0.0066615455,9.0584064e-7,0.000008627678,0.000009524769,0.04116704,0.0000037658306,0.000086724525,0.90712285,0.011346393,0.033503883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105889965,0.0000072675316,0.008557808,0.0000044058224,0.000004088562,0.000002005658,0.003504691,0.000040674364,0.00008256667,0.0022285907,0.9853622,0.00009984008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010628206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01966354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9740158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004770721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106314204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240287932","doi":"","title":"What could have been?: the common law doctrine of Native Title in land under salt water in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand [Paper presented at the Conference of the Association for Canadian Studies in Australia and New Zealand (2004: Sydney).]","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Monash University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Doctrine; Project commissioning; Publishing; Salt water; Law; Political science; Salt lake; Sociology; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.08078244953061124,"score_gpt":0.3339157999329103,"score_spread":0.25313335040229906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240287932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87916183,0.0035001063,4.685235e-7,0.10905406,0.00009468997,0.0019948643,0.00012515945,0.00000526953,0.00606352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8612765,0.0032347897,0.0000041377807,0.00020909544,0.000015375586,0.0000018637134,0.000008206401,0.0000021047952,0.1352479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949336,0.00010558988,0.00010553653,0.00008333789,0.00009428776,0.00011791554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996884,0.00009862748,0.00006131255,0.0000767114,0.00004420186,0.00003076152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029115425,0.00004986223,0.0001417441,0.000015305632,0.000101230886,0.000017206716,0.000106755244,0.000043171676,0.000040551393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000113309015,0.000028550581,0.000020725563,0.000103428174,0.00018080696,0.00011520205,0.00004557653,0.00008068551,0.0000014769988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039531595,0.000081820624,0.19429536,0.00041664043,0.00011738674,0.0000051536417,0.0151611855,0.00009504744,0.0000846728,0.5806068,0.2088662,0.0002302089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000381764,0.000008037144,0.04113446,0.00031014558,0.000037735448,2.3871345e-7,0.00036496276,0.0000036837905,0.000041113373,0.010680043,0.94697917,0.000058647413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8478663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98005337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.738113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017375656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005206874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15314679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240297430","doi":"","title":"De Quelques Invariables De La Possession: La Possession Transsystémique (Comparative Possession)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Humanities; Common law; Opposition (politics); Law; Political science; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03631969446359612,"score_gpt":0.3417786493921622,"score_spread":0.30545895492856606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240297430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5504642,0.030719414,0.09248672,0.010801607,0.00079622376,0.0006836381,0.000034614764,0.00019941956,0.31381416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95896727,0.024698831,0.0028004474,0.00037095963,0.00095739303,0.00003772357,0.0000048275515,0.000045422847,0.012117131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99232996,0.0030027127,0.00062493875,0.00042527795,0.00045930626,0.003157806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979381,0.00058646407,0.00045519063,0.00027630062,0.00022851292,0.00051546353],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006865984,0.0003864311,0.00044856977,0.00012552172,0.0016817176,0.00041975928,0.00089458865,0.00062922493,0.0008570936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012927731,0.00033601868,0.0002925239,0.0006340441,0.0008456578,0.0010640821,0.00008391356,0.003972624,0.000081980324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007940477,0.0005213713,0.002272235,0.000026633168,0.00015002885,0.000028295102,0.019147707,0.000037518235,0.0019062053,0.9661329,0.0005141967,0.009183531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072168896,0.0002990416,0.0035574073,0.0005321111,0.00018300953,0.0011564103,0.027985685,0.00020142789,0.0015074813,0.8607898,0.10252637,0.00053960044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009112666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044950703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40850306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023244321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014522976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241306239","doi":"","title":"A Cross-jurisdictional Examination of Mergers and Amalgamations: Effects and Proposals for Reform","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Academy of Law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Project commissioning; Law reform; Publishing; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.02356982668972337,"score_gpt":0.3641988866493685,"score_spread":0.34062905995964515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241306239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987212,0.00016437015,0.00047948168,0.002951053,0.00008488011,0.00031065766,0.000016924507,0.000010753442,0.008769849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956007,0.000109387765,0.0039165975,0.000046865545,0.00021424916,0.000013100372,0.0000017177289,0.000005350681,0.00009201536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924916,0.000040221723,0.0002714489,0.00009195647,0.00022558682,0.00012159898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993049,0.00016594428,0.00027581205,0.00003057796,0.00013138921,0.00009139381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013406753,0.000055450408,0.00011438467,0.00005238492,0.0007786296,0.000055976514,0.00009040447,0.00012396518,0.000017180915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013993315,0.00004704119,0.00003924048,0.00007914339,0.0006239839,0.00037868705,0.000019502371,0.0002481069,2.2726184e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011095977,0.000031660133,0.0010194967,0.00006234449,0.000018429253,8.997175e-8,0.002448626,0.0000019742936,0.018762829,0.96206045,0.00002561389,0.015557416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031687603,0.00040332013,0.3354218,0.00035609267,0.00022412284,0.00009266878,0.002948694,0.0010982024,0.068384424,0.31537038,0.2719653,0.00056624616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001685284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001032288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6466901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025388465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005078464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5988668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241474305","doi":"","title":"Resolution of Mass Tort Claims in the Bankruptcy System","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Mass tort; Tort; Liability; Resolution (logic); Business; Law and economics; Law; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029035246333304104,"score_gpt":0.33791449210174285,"score_spread":0.3088792457684387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241474305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20142168,0.000027185164,0.006172397,0.0019743245,0.000055565146,0.00023815039,0.0000014279268,0.000030365867,0.79007894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998567,0.000004778953,0.00038447411,0.00006043964,0.00008522834,0.0000058529836,6.23243e-7,0.00000130596,0.0008903207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994736,0.00004443304,0.00012951047,0.00005817186,0.0001783007,0.00011600078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974,0.00007643695,0.000031964446,0.000106021034,0.000026197262,0.00001937734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015272574,0.000021586493,0.000040020444,0.000019680321,0.00012374383,0.000012508895,0.00016340174,0.000034759818,0.000024452747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000123727505,0.00001491966,0.000021078024,0.0002334008,0.000055884077,0.000046462406,0.000008566509,0.000042955166,0.000017647133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016200613,0.000011933111,0.002149475,0.0000034948475,7.087485e-7,4.1154513e-7,0.0022635213,0.000005393139,0.00016173076,0.99443084,0.0002834582,0.0006873843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031704988,0.00003631083,0.1996081,0.000041079405,0.000012929002,0.0000012698848,0.14470802,0.0004953391,0.0007400601,0.008169643,0.6456866,0.0001835772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055156653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007847867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98626125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006347362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034801415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8338073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243794389","doi":"","title":"The Law of Restitution in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008967143575353885,"score_gpt":0.20267207766325498,"score_spread":0.1937049340879011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243794389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041174097,0.00017342938,0.00005251331,0.0030618797,0.00023909894,0.0005102694,0.0012339848,0.000014450345,0.99059695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29561663,0.0002518747,0.000015652076,0.000066860746,0.000059458464,9.4928095e-7,0.000029980787,0.0000068545887,0.7039518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988753,0.000076292534,0.00015241632,0.00021738521,0.0004278419,0.0002507314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920595,0.00017994919,0.00018008631,0.0002866799,0.00007283559,0.00007450671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018935117,0.000120165314,0.00020313918,0.000057819885,0.0009722106,0.000028877976,0.0006176947,0.00013328074,0.000034404817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021214015,0.00011990346,0.00009104215,0.0002937737,0.0005862066,0.00037813594,0.00013492006,0.0002666996,0.000008748125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002441727,0.000013207442,0.000041030904,0.000013198818,0.0000141308,0.00003980405,0.00040157663,0.00016552774,8.9884503e-7,0.98965657,0.009579232,0.00005038361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028144842,0.000008058481,0.00045515032,0.0000797771,0.000024160334,4.3439914e-7,0.0032645229,0.000011131509,0.0000022733643,0.010399772,0.9853275,0.00014581216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007238105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029375132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244789019","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.018","title":"The contribution of fiduciary law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02166025923041811,"score_gpt":0.22995489938916383,"score_spread":0.20829464015874571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244789019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000054226028,0.00013303504,0.00008169013,0.00020941469,0.00010910465,0.00046903675,0.000106538704,0.000045532975,0.9987914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029682716,0.00025613044,0.000013029473,0.000042552172,0.0001365989,0.0000012952488,0.000018292596,0.000009495563,0.9698399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992342,0.000047632664,0.00012826717,0.00017565895,0.00023048658,0.00018374895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894166,0.00015483066,0.00021053277,0.00031374829,0.00028908948,0.00009012439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018743721,0.0001133604,0.0001583392,0.000021379255,0.0009816594,0.000048154587,0.00048672355,0.00021363999,0.000009607514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014995424,0.00010407107,0.00013250422,0.0000060388143,0.00087853015,0.00006806798,0.00016298042,0.00021608248,0.000028806595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007405069,0.000003070963,4.0450465e-7,0.000003928884,0.00003210289,0.000002121074,0.00008221611,2.500419e-7,0.000011777525,0.9778444,0.021436185,0.00057612057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010970957,0.00000797669,0.000007621502,0.00002652552,0.00005831547,2.3638755e-7,0.000100153644,0.0000047635735,0.00008817233,0.00037852858,0.999104,0.00011397488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062921382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003037991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000135465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015122075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95118725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245621942","doi":"","title":"Some Australian Reflections on Roncarelli","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Principle of legality; Statutory law; Political science; Common law; Statute; High Court; Damages; Misconduct; Liability","score_opus":0.032950925669973194,"score_gpt":0.36863282461743657,"score_spread":0.33568189894746336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245621942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6570914,0.00033699468,0.00083992234,0.10403062,0.0023926601,0.00047456418,0.0000104631,0.00027072322,0.23455265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675423,0.0011154788,0.000089058776,0.00020533623,0.0023632597,0.0000084347275,0.0000012269865,0.000010834164,0.02866406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979843,0.000055460918,0.00013925025,0.00013432356,0.0002548086,0.0014318909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995364,0.00003556877,0.00007438509,0.00014674192,0.000060413226,0.00014647217],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011129314,0.00007642416,0.00007153941,0.00006322478,0.0013797502,0.00011874693,0.00030997358,0.000097269694,0.00014702762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066681445,0.00006919083,0.00008729268,0.0001963675,0.00011361388,0.00020497608,0.000012856314,0.0025569908,0.000264852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033156098,0.000038302725,0.00009139062,2.4931796e-7,0.0000139331505,3.8593026e-7,0.00048474368,0.0000075482044,0.0011082637,0.99370044,0.00046818715,0.0040832534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103191625,0.00006301915,0.00023790174,0.0000019728263,0.000008785909,0.000016730588,0.0025813503,0.0000015628582,0.00009344651,0.44183427,0.55497515,0.00008262502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001099367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03654265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55450696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046556012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019349935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245724478","doi":"","title":"A 'PPSA' registration primer","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Statute; Business; Property (philosophy); Security interest; State (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Finance; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08669454872963996,"score_gpt":0.387659541656537,"score_spread":0.30096499292689705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245724478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12162406,0.00012127202,0.0005106076,0.006745896,0.00013751342,0.00024956136,0.0000028425236,0.0000767802,0.87053144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953623,0.00020767274,0.0010122086,0.00014086562,0.00027930416,0.000018202672,0.0000022320426,0.000009279766,0.04470725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918723,0.000058502017,0.00012851517,0.00020000442,0.00020836064,0.00021736135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994258,0.000023676066,0.000114791714,0.00027081626,0.000059011047,0.000105864565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025657652,0.00008721381,0.00008867208,0.000020625179,0.00032719865,0.00008133628,0.00021643017,0.00009631702,0.0010046336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004143215,0.00008496921,0.000056457564,0.00022878133,0.00018636626,0.00012579706,0.000038962557,0.00010759146,0.0010125155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009923118,0.00013691008,0.0015625531,0.000011535089,0.00001489259,0.000001617461,0.051996145,4.4369582e-7,0.0006657408,0.9374262,0.0049211835,0.0032528548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001444504,0.000049342467,0.018012963,0.000021713786,0.000036427424,7.005156e-7,0.007386808,0.00003492666,0.001335418,0.0031353214,0.9696566,0.00018531378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013523208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047932012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96473545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004059172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012879304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245760019","doi":"","title":"Comparative Analysis of Canadian Law, Aboriginal Law and Civil Law Traditions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian indigenous law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Project commissioning; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Common law; Sociology; Public law; Social science","score_opus":0.05499892801041512,"score_gpt":0.37051561079033435,"score_spread":0.31551668277991923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245760019","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05903806,0.0019362591,0.0000029395642,0.005022716,0.000121357414,0.0012141916,0.0011636495,0.00005155301,0.9314493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99284196,0.003580883,0.0002562267,0.0025405993,0.00008404277,0.000062029394,0.00010442092,0.000007091796,0.00052274525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859416,0.00011232813,0.0003658005,0.00026122967,0.00023485256,0.00043161897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988233,0.00006711312,0.00015991,0.00034103013,0.00013988768,0.00046879778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047859873,0.00014746551,0.0005239127,0.00010565941,0.0015655383,0.00010487731,0.00032719798,0.0001084072,0.0009097896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003562588,0.00014172631,0.00017077339,0.0014032915,0.0012727262,0.00021790552,0.0000073614847,0.0002778999,0.000053023967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.9137132e-7,0.000040706167,0.00010742361,0.00007469194,0.00015563233,0.0000027522658,0.0054265023,0.0000014723163,0.000030378029,0.99363995,0.0004776748,0.00004241199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049358405,0.000017555147,0.0006788116,0.00009397334,0.0007100568,0.000002170631,0.0002157208,6.176116e-7,0.000052089046,0.0019476097,0.99606764,0.00016441439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9575737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007217436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003360239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245788390","doi":"","title":"The Future for Business Trusts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Statutory law; Business; Corporate law; Accountability; Legislature; Law and economics; Law; Corporate governance; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.018975518554385926,"score_gpt":0.28481079653616553,"score_spread":0.2658352779817796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245788390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28246588,0.029408947,0.14103174,0.19738337,0.005923868,0.0031359608,0.000025100664,0.00037328788,0.34025183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98205346,0.00779291,0.00018719363,0.000097128344,0.0022167757,0.000028123432,6.3974204e-7,0.000009655135,0.007614115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849373,0.000038851605,0.00010603767,0.000073067225,0.00013167583,0.0011566485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958855,0.000042969954,0.000075428485,0.00009046376,0.00014935962,0.000053218097],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015014003,0.000049443737,0.000049186216,0.000013917999,0.0019293096,0.00007487433,0.00036251213,0.000044543285,0.000022049975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049497936,0.000031468742,0.00005985294,0.00016342738,0.00008322453,0.000113648086,0.000012915975,0.00043052377,0.000011680587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011832381,0.000012547192,0.00012319899,4.2878864e-7,0.000014733448,7.0837196e-8,0.00094638404,3.354133e-7,0.000006000131,0.95438474,0.00033403668,0.044165667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112278656,0.000019777295,0.0008594058,0.0000011795347,0.00000906655,0.00000687295,0.0083189905,0.0000040792725,0.00000635729,0.42459852,0.5660176,0.000045837394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030979453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01824056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6995876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002486575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018802858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246285831","doi":"10.2307/825992","title":"Taking Law Seriously","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; sort; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.014648262376545214,"score_gpt":0.2551295873113233,"score_spread":0.24048132493477808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246285831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037401833,0.00012715787,0.00009035744,0.0009634071,0.00004148407,0.000039266935,0.0000037967495,0.000017238104,0.96131545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99268353,0.00034140603,0.0010000144,0.00010891147,0.00012671342,1.5883456e-8,4.17758e-7,0.0000022710992,0.0057367263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953526,0.000046694517,0.000061175604,0.000060769053,0.00016363627,0.00013248505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967295,0.000014665185,0.00007897416,0.00006920374,0.000055935154,0.000108246146],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017432965,0.000035147637,0.00006645643,0.0000034280094,0.0015222378,0.000037203587,0.00025662134,0.00003829271,0.016904999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027451779,0.000040016697,0.00006468946,0.000019745758,0.0002278622,0.00045691984,0.000017379843,0.00007578182,0.000035635207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013852159,0.00003189146,0.00009330967,0.0000012557174,0.000014602672,0.000009570115,0.009217567,0.00003136918,0.00004661547,0.97428584,0.0006509277,0.015603201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016145232,0.00001445759,0.0007623326,0.000008569738,0.000011373077,0.0000042471625,0.005159616,0.000009589703,0.000008132975,0.0008712823,0.9929376,0.000051343606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4589903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64850885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017871098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047909107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246802114","doi":"","title":"Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Labrador Liquor Wholesale Pty Ltd","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bar News: The Journal of the NSW Bar Association","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Officer; Chief executive officer; Law; Business; Excise; High Court; Management; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.01224027266324897,"score_gpt":0.2714355783200659,"score_spread":0.2591953056568169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246802114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90247667,0.00046526032,0.00054993347,0.03479195,0.0010789046,0.0006368713,0.000045846547,0.000025869722,0.059928704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98899907,0.00026243782,0.00014638598,0.0003920807,0.00038405476,0.00000313004,6.305214e-7,0.000012844083,0.009799363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974685,0.0009716325,0.0004636601,0.00008797249,0.0007650334,0.0002432541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977676,0.0004395647,0.0010340285,0.0002277203,0.0004518852,0.00007919539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031758025,0.00010322774,0.00021503842,0.000040604646,0.0006334617,0.000057504272,0.0005997024,0.00013146462,0.000111628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014769364,0.00006203292,0.00024055387,0.00037405416,0.00011164511,0.0002453568,0.000048667236,0.00036548305,0.000041577314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030924883,0.0018530843,0.0914836,0.00006322024,0.0013522363,0.0000034588993,0.14499976,0.0029062098,0.035629828,0.39384475,0.3177031,0.009851504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011790805,0.0001116606,0.07646637,0.00010520256,0.00043218865,0.000008093453,0.016333576,0.000049218226,0.008537672,0.007862564,0.8886313,0.00028307468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079205405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006577052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5709282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046664895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038425776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48721394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248313797","doi":"","title":"Compensation and Punishment in Tort Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Culpability; Law; Political science; Sanctions; Harm; Punitive damages; Law and economics; Punishment (psychology); Enforcement; Private law; Temptation; Public law; Sociology; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.010712854563306904,"score_gpt":0.275816692253757,"score_spread":0.2651038376904501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248313797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92538583,0.00046136655,0.00039025987,0.018725615,0.00005194821,0.00024828262,3.4511956e-7,0.00001663841,0.054719735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975213,0.0010909769,0.00005259444,0.00016200906,0.000112784815,0.000010504146,5.62721e-7,0.0000029475902,0.0010463567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990154,0.000047737514,0.00010435069,0.00006670438,0.00012402984,0.0006417831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981445,0.00001919277,0.000039577677,0.000041953197,0.00003195726,0.00005289326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077518536,0.00003578411,0.000048970905,0.000021625965,0.00029887495,0.00009748308,0.000087950815,0.000028401937,0.000057473088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010775927,0.000032319782,0.000015087977,0.00007320728,0.00006142307,0.00022420808,0.000013917633,0.0003823906,0.00003213452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.949267e-7,0.000014008075,0.0021178941,3.2845165e-7,0.0000034856232,9.68471e-8,0.00062795216,0.0000022081379,0.0000622005,0.9911837,0.000035094265,0.0059523536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030533058,0.00004596764,0.016304156,0.0000065410795,0.000004959468,0.000012533007,0.00930368,0.00006766452,0.0000164852,0.8563713,0.11745912,0.00010228188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010843232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05260165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1348124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004355856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043516094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99574363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249147043","doi":"","title":"Writing About the Death Penalty","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Capital punishment; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Classics; Criminology; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.02565109008565519,"score_gpt":0.30217404620473515,"score_spread":0.27652295611907995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249147043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18753362,0.0003986624,0.00020979745,0.008225912,0.000104335,0.0002614615,0.0000133502535,0.00013719888,0.80311567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868746,0.000026861728,0.0004288689,0.0010995817,0.0011918888,0.000045632558,0.000005836902,0.000009550974,0.010317173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893117,0.00009003284,0.00018258874,0.00018118953,0.00029099366,0.00032400066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993933,0.00012115435,0.000066802,0.00025338176,0.00006450053,0.000100892816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005950304,0.00007803597,0.00008267044,0.000010356893,0.0017037658,0.00029034977,0.00038816442,0.000057175675,0.00046664584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005586067,0.00005823358,0.000072543255,0.0001656682,0.00018273412,0.00018700604,0.000059059003,0.00019948432,0.00058912876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.968415e-7,0.000019210644,0.006378929,0.0000017738168,0.0000026570708,0.0000010845123,0.00017737072,0.000020534997,0.00008139361,0.99015635,0.0027647659,0.00039502716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097376804,0.0000042431507,0.023817731,0.000009948732,0.000008306021,7.807896e-7,0.0005039721,0.00002367837,0.00010716463,0.027495593,0.9478279,0.00010333135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056794733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024847887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006765991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009553301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252457141","doi":"","title":"The taxation element in awards of damages for personal injuries and death.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Element (criminal law); Personal injury; Forensic engineering; Law; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.02500399751210295,"score_gpt":0.27198813157449375,"score_spread":0.2469841340623908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252457141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04603218,0.0014424182,0.0029019492,0.014719524,0.0001365301,0.00269468,0.00036430298,0.0007822354,0.9309262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5259644,0.007807373,0.0013303235,0.000034529243,0.0000892875,0.000023882192,0.000025551733,0.00004735082,0.46467733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993381,0.00004263895,0.000094025774,0.00019625339,0.00014615091,0.0001828341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951774,0.000105669846,0.00020001853,0.000111555164,0.00003491611,0.000030075294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017755838,0.00009543328,0.00014874652,0.0001903195,0.00037764656,0.00001699246,0.0003238516,0.00030695027,0.000039187642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015021855,0.00007438472,0.000052718297,0.00033870086,0.00070858415,0.000035607874,0.00013060056,0.00014403248,0.0000021526157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013553811,0.000056383942,0.002572472,0.000016114362,0.000022550745,0.0000036706592,0.00048692012,2.0075639e-7,0.00002987235,0.96895796,0.017740117,0.01010018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015766695,0.00003429423,0.0011191127,0.00002696113,0.000012530846,1.48463e-7,0.0023827883,0.000016027756,0.000028001401,0.0015576148,0.99456954,0.00009529342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096904626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00315929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97682947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093762326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007692015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30333206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252460478","doi":"","title":"Strate v. A-1 Contractors: Intrusion into the Sovereign Domain of Native Nations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Sovereignty; Jurisdiction; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Sovereign immunity; Supreme Court Decisions; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.014211964238102538,"score_gpt":0.2874388920489146,"score_spread":0.27322692781081204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252460478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92231464,0.0008409386,0.0070959507,0.0061548743,0.000098144905,0.00027862986,0.000004806802,0.000023242574,0.06318877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946417,0.0037491631,0.00009434408,0.000056411034,0.00028480781,0.000007648638,0.000001287219,0.000006046395,0.0011585429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984496,0.00017951107,0.00021869357,0.000091916074,0.00035100678,0.0007092435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992597,0.0001923279,0.00020468132,0.00009866419,0.00018765671,0.00005693522],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015274266,0.0000681048,0.00009536269,0.000059380836,0.001875258,0.00003186497,0.00033469964,0.000052963434,0.00006535749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016368178,0.000046945486,0.000080944825,0.0003526053,0.0003285508,0.00020931267,0.000024963514,0.00081060216,0.000011422874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007304831,0.000038893606,0.00037075675,5.0381294e-7,0.00003214531,4.1426958e-7,0.010733566,0.000014749894,0.00025661543,0.98706764,0.00004396376,0.0014334177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030145978,0.000077688506,0.0014941205,0.000008125933,0.000012887697,0.000025003243,0.033367604,0.000016959802,0.00016714209,0.9405725,0.02386739,0.00008910577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017243589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015324191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07232711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005358459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032602283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252949048","doi":"","title":"Rights and Remedies: A Complex Relationship","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Plaintiff; Reservation of rights; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Common law; Human rights; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.04314057453781277,"score_gpt":0.3305134882964798,"score_spread":0.287372913758667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252949048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8247576,0.004976009,0.0066261743,0.015540071,0.0002745518,0.00030078596,0.0000030139215,0.000096769094,0.14742503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405026,0.0005465015,0.00018347915,0.000068928464,0.00073991844,0.0000039550455,0.000001129683,0.0000044014278,0.0044014193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983493,0.00009134727,0.000116999305,0.000063515035,0.00017396668,0.0012048901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995973,0.000093959854,0.000064795,0.000063844745,0.00003864844,0.00014146697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017849043,0.000050193266,0.00006120144,0.000034711087,0.0012813625,0.000052036747,0.00011347012,0.000043623648,0.000054427575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086233624,0.000042014508,0.000030306714,0.00012375106,0.000116349845,0.0002829418,0.000016977654,0.0006238186,0.000047976813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018285364,0.000016076163,0.012549439,4.824013e-7,0.0000098397395,5.7097658e-8,0.0025050018,2.477692e-7,0.000015871841,0.98352516,0.0003199314,0.0010560665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012346393,0.00001613748,0.016574051,0.0000029574614,0.000012686001,0.000026703176,0.0036186757,0.0000053945973,0.0000020433401,0.6097062,0.3698419,0.00006973721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007359372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37381893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033734713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045894593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98553336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253338422","doi":"","title":"Dolphin Delivery: The Constitutional Values Standard and its Implications for Private Law in Quebec","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Law; Common law; Political science; Enforcement; Private law; Diversity (politics); Public law","score_opus":0.05484862808334706,"score_gpt":0.3356468472450946,"score_spread":0.2807982191617475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253338422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.680834,0.00045602978,0.0100295395,0.11363544,0.000081169215,0.0020097955,0.00031894646,0.00013062268,0.19250444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961361,0.0001747409,0.00070612354,0.0005677856,0.00006456738,0.00012642564,0.0000061502496,0.0000020372217,0.0022160397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952567,0.000028307644,0.00010744473,0.00011717817,0.00008918002,0.00013220226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958044,0.00018622709,0.000026272895,0.000081886596,0.000079530386,0.000045641376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002481455,0.00004297729,0.000058531954,0.000014058142,0.0012124926,0.000043836008,0.00012949614,0.00003172757,0.000029447914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050141673,0.000030446958,0.000023228476,0.000115369454,0.00079677824,0.00015682448,0.000031063075,0.00004471701,0.000006531443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034229347,0.000011230228,0.0013024381,0.0000011058421,0.00000266801,6.7628704e-8,0.0010577014,0.000010698273,0.0000762663,0.99654573,0.00070541573,0.0002832641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026666065,0.000009201909,0.017226843,0.000004320418,0.000005600679,0.0000014210874,0.00055869546,0.00007382581,0.00013228664,0.065115586,0.91651714,0.000088427856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012384708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091780424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93143016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006129642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023789826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253747404","doi":"10.5040/9781472565198.ch-007","title":"A Common Law Prescription for a Medical Malaise","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malaise; Medical prescription; Law; Medicine; Political science; Internal medicine; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.042835555366917785,"score_gpt":0.30187336570386375,"score_spread":0.25903781033694595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253747404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022551527,0.000041540414,0.0010738457,0.0073210816,0.00042224966,0.000792359,0.00009589049,0.00024951258,0.989981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03765064,0.000010455624,0.00035682108,0.003216341,0.0026600792,0.00025065392,0.00017017905,0.00006453874,0.9556203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795914,0.000050844043,0.00036656414,0.00039640794,0.0008660848,0.0003609388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854475,0.00026574652,0.00021824287,0.00039978194,0.0002140415,0.00035744603],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016793195,0.00020065061,0.0002997615,0.00006890184,0.00086683506,0.0018321353,0.0008153116,0.000755161,0.0005604644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028482213,0.00019944037,0.00021276138,0.000012771055,0.0004037573,0.0003899094,0.00016844027,0.0005931222,0.00009108966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059977783,0.000003909815,0.000003009057,0.000027245504,0.00001578937,0.0000011780436,0.0006477998,1.354023e-7,0.0000033340093,0.8982374,0.09148504,0.009569162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018147632,0.000016009608,0.0000034881893,0.00012454878,0.000033251956,0.000001092856,0.000026795882,0.0000417044,0.0000038232674,0.122089095,0.87727743,0.00020128352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002269139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016336147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7857924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012784623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003700254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254170277","doi":"","title":"The Bank's Fiduciary Duty: An Israeli-Canadian Comparison","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.01186058638554037,"score_gpt":0.29704782186293044,"score_spread":0.28518723547739006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254170277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52667207,0.010888843,0.0026919935,0.09673656,0.00083222054,0.0006523021,0.000016392376,0.00016225767,0.36134738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99184674,0.0009993588,0.000033096374,0.00021043229,0.0012700245,0.000006668802,0.0000043731748,0.000010867921,0.0056184144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717623,0.0001542769,0.00021342108,0.00013269289,0.00027815523,0.002045251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939466,0.00005958834,0.00009863249,0.00017235163,0.000082147664,0.00019260307],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00226473,0.000082205814,0.00008725431,0.000045697238,0.0036998068,0.00032118056,0.0005332616,0.00006875322,0.000053158263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003396232,0.00006237861,0.00006946893,0.00021309993,0.00015104748,0.00022044824,0.000014423446,0.0010330089,0.00009561797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026963721,0.000025649391,0.002637803,1.8102202e-7,0.000011159877,5.723648e-7,0.00032628322,0.000029383822,0.00001496159,0.97864753,0.0022081768,0.016095601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009135769,0.000034388086,0.0030303071,0.0000016805353,0.000009675267,0.000010524212,0.0057400507,0.00008880176,0.0000066797097,0.3011088,0.6897877,0.00009005052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31201732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96942186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6875795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001182241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053036218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254551673","doi":"10.29173/alr1384","title":"A Choice among Values: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives on the Defence of Necessity","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03708634020627528,"score_gpt":0.3025293478092375,"score_spread":0.26544300760296224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254551673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05148759,0.06343672,0.00002177039,0.081387974,0.000046184276,0.0007388002,0.0000020526936,0.000021646585,0.8028573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96630186,0.031304754,0.000025650603,0.0011174575,0.00005463301,0.000028787794,1.5081166e-7,0.000003602996,0.0011630792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992041,0.00020284226,0.0001360469,0.0001606278,0.00017809046,0.00011829106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984578,0.0011480746,0.00006869067,0.00021609262,0.000042649826,0.000066682456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037983165,0.00006168932,0.00015297806,0.000004699047,0.0003425475,0.000019888315,0.00022435618,0.0000314189,0.0006849687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008547177,0.000037406302,0.0000626381,0.00015987993,0.00083424203,0.00006894723,0.000037174148,0.00010443752,0.000033393993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.128035e-7,0.000040459585,0.0005314709,0.000041555904,0.00000402208,8.204505e-8,0.00234529,4.037111e-8,8.065823e-7,0.99488795,0.0015231818,0.00062481273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004936496,0.000028536097,0.0011925726,0.0005558627,0.000060531067,5.4698046e-7,0.00043676607,0.000035299316,0.000004299044,0.008013555,0.98951286,0.00010981423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012610122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024534157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98798966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006221158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009799107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99396497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254894082","doi":"","title":"Contract Theory: 'Introduction to General Theories' and 'The Justification of Contractual Obligations'","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Obligation; Contract theory; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006448288431329427,"score_gpt":0.27587391130258176,"score_spread":0.2694256228712523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254894082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7331358,0.0010568982,0.12233931,0.13953911,0.00029251736,0.0006977946,0.0000075389116,0.000036121437,0.002894883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642295,0.0010286185,0.00016592476,0.00017628081,0.001340209,0.00001824658,0.000002343073,0.0000063275616,0.0008391171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862015,0.00019556582,0.0002294138,0.00012485262,0.00021860488,0.0006114147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993199,0.0001423031,0.00016232661,0.00012566619,0.00017819065,0.000071603594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004470446,0.00006701059,0.000114593546,0.000046116318,0.0007792055,0.00008492426,0.00018279949,0.00004577204,0.000022364391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048904674,0.00004745241,0.00005241174,0.00021840437,0.00037615857,0.00018670977,0.000013476862,0.00047948048,0.000009700064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000860315,0.000025006628,0.000031360538,6.243528e-7,0.000030106998,4.7393858e-8,0.0034599663,0.0002070352,0.0005970038,0.9868584,0.000020705103,0.008683693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008422409,0.000046867935,0.00068167504,0.0000032568519,0.000043134718,0.000020907233,0.0068859276,0.000012087134,0.00027687856,0.97732365,0.013798147,0.00006525423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088717154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022009846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2632871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003487466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012662064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59930974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255112517","doi":"","title":"The Telezone Litigation: Artful Pleading and the Dismemberment of Federal Administrative Law or Access to Meaningful Relief","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Political science; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Pleading; Jurisdiction; Appeal; Principle of legality; Civil procedure; Damages","score_opus":0.026224323520852386,"score_gpt":0.3544496665854709,"score_spread":0.3282253430646185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255112517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79428345,0.00034506206,0.001357038,0.13508114,0.00029316585,0.00086243113,0.000005560726,0.00002843862,0.06774374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961489,0.0006603441,0.00007133811,0.00028805796,0.0004066182,0.000030866475,4.7911965e-7,0.000006509072,0.002386892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984675,0.0001273163,0.0002356609,0.00011846999,0.0002922128,0.000758847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911857,0.00035139587,0.00017098656,0.00013423487,0.00012206535,0.00010272839],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002566517,0.00007747195,0.00010931476,0.0000143215775,0.0024310502,0.0005095374,0.0004699103,0.000040713967,0.000028207765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023626798,0.000039699178,0.00004416054,0.00017213648,0.0005334589,0.00023846999,0.000071119044,0.00092064607,0.0000041576022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067421264,0.000016103464,0.00013889583,9.0486867e-7,0.000028003551,2.1866173e-7,0.003951532,0.0000023156524,0.0001517551,0.99215704,0.00008627239,0.0033995546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010427533,0.00030710534,0.0012920292,0.00002603505,0.000042015752,0.00007795608,0.030407475,0.000050040784,0.0007011504,0.6655676,0.30028543,0.00020041635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001063044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13167198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32658944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108114466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014223034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255320997","doi":"","title":"Contribution à une étude des troubles de voisinage et de la nuisance : la notion de devoirs de la propriété (Contribution to a Study of Neighbourhood Disturbances and Excessive Annoyances: The Notion of Duties Incumbent Upon Ownership)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Obligation; Supreme court; Law; Dimension (graph theory); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Welfare economics; Economics; Public law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015834592936013605,"score_gpt":0.3056801416061689,"score_spread":0.28984554867015533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255320997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92818654,0.0064768726,0.062143058,0.0015872926,0.00005182965,0.00058376667,0.000022610944,0.000018786564,0.0009292549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99218166,0.0070928377,0.00036147868,0.000042236017,0.00016950832,0.00008217881,0.0000034159584,0.000016029118,0.00005063058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99469495,0.002807446,0.0004877112,0.00024748646,0.00035934523,0.0014030783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814093,0.0005402208,0.0006756018,0.00015010059,0.00034516698,0.00014798836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093348995,0.00021471191,0.00030953204,0.000075933705,0.0008525438,0.00014132373,0.00038352332,0.00021610798,0.000008507293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006426334,0.00016736035,0.000107961714,0.00057209056,0.00081401377,0.00048217303,0.000071983486,0.0010612056,8.1454783e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033874164,0.0010484802,0.05371181,0.000038177215,0.00019822389,0.000003545492,0.055236083,0.0006047168,0.0019458039,0.8760339,0.000002846158,0.010837683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015980739,0.0010560037,0.42697445,0.00024578546,0.00031589335,0.000111498666,0.051006608,0.0003136143,0.0026563576,0.5150429,0.0004515924,0.00022720871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012129205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042784944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37326264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018793567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021080037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99444914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255921133","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2015.20511","title":"Comparative overview on the transformative effect of acquisitive prescription and adverse possession : morality, legitimacy, justice","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Legitimacy; Medical prescription; Possession (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine; History; Pharmacology; Land tenure","score_opus":0.10552151013526145,"score_gpt":0.3757852775835352,"score_spread":0.27026376744827374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255921133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89956677,0.0025385357,0.0012224807,0.014386679,0.00049789855,0.0010275317,0.00030407644,0.000024843963,0.08043117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568087,0.00063261326,0.00010406763,0.00024669355,0.00027917203,0.000084079686,0.000034285127,0.000008804151,0.0029294172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980721,0.0006944527,0.00036847644,0.00023058677,0.00041991347,0.00021447419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784696,0.0011989134,0.00029996719,0.00017044845,0.0003260966,0.00015758818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079186,0.00017374686,0.00034620517,0.000055064473,0.00022738035,0.000059571943,0.00034104002,0.000084395826,0.00011472926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014623743,0.00014875176,0.00012321703,0.00023813812,0.0005276997,0.00044722253,0.00007549255,0.00026211576,0.000093238734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015484352,0.00020441906,0.0006844655,0.00023889655,0.00011308645,0.0000034982086,0.025466403,0.0014947548,0.00010769555,0.9665068,0.001883287,0.003141851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073265927,0.003027085,0.09250514,0.009167082,0.0022279005,0.00014460602,0.058819335,0.25908998,0.01621726,0.10362593,0.44606188,0.0017871992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016426959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032125422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004959188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013506557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60659206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256102448","doi":"","title":"The Political Path to Limited Liability in Business Trusts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Limited liability; Appeal; Liability; Statutory law; Legislature; Business; Politics; Law and economics; Limited liability partnership; Variety (cybernetics); Strict liability; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.008512584094819073,"score_gpt":0.2842754211853111,"score_spread":0.275762837090492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256102448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8600658,0.0002973222,0.001789015,0.10690692,0.00012541699,0.0002786428,0.0000026170517,0.000033612938,0.030500617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722874,0.00021981141,0.00003786285,0.00019054893,0.00053948374,0.00001327291,7.929995e-7,0.00000623054,0.0017632499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725187,0.0001406743,0.0002152399,0.0001258516,0.00025531175,0.0020110477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994564,0.00013938072,0.000043638618,0.0001311217,0.00012321348,0.00010626222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019130835,0.00006600831,0.00007988084,0.00003800211,0.0007722009,0.00013504236,0.00032707452,0.00005227955,0.000011100852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028913247,0.000046848,0.000044720768,0.00057100836,0.00011547929,0.00009016547,0.000030334126,0.00068709743,0.000023796838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008113244,0.000049839637,0.006196365,5.380722e-7,0.0000026290122,4.7859845e-7,0.00011945475,0.000021771973,0.000025326077,0.9907596,0.00008352497,0.002732341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020600359,0.000031014697,0.07919248,0.0000068230643,0.0000056923077,0.000007570012,0.0044894177,0.000039277722,0.000011152204,0.77832,0.13757847,0.00011210224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011547926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11527185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21243963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013242331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022626196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256424075","doi":"","title":"Damages for Breach of Contracts with Alternative Performances","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Breach of contract; Discretion; Salary; Reputation; Law; Business; Position (finance); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.021296013449943422,"score_gpt":0.299655240809771,"score_spread":0.2783592273598276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256424075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732184,0.0006921687,0.010307917,0.001976682,0.000046533976,0.00024746757,0.000006544651,0.000014814514,0.013489497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99367946,0.003755733,0.0002857564,0.000030349114,0.00027811393,0.00001128649,0.0000012408107,0.000005934741,0.0019521014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879897,0.000029874569,0.00012563626,0.00007677067,0.00020366213,0.0007651177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950594,0.000071249866,0.00015226881,0.00005667461,0.00016266543,0.00005120696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074184994,0.000054550783,0.00009888162,0.00003283769,0.0006415629,0.000017149632,0.00020415972,0.000026269774,0.000009929188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033416403,0.000040127492,0.000045556848,0.00009928703,0.00019023468,0.00022291622,0.0000072134826,0.00035059213,0.00000238545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007293681,0.00007865117,0.0038243865,0.0000029877178,0.00009205965,8.103186e-7,0.005076803,0.00008078222,0.00017417377,0.9816845,0.00009426338,0.008817627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006008757,0.00299983,0.019584233,0.000100314464,0.00015116244,0.0006166401,0.06249141,0.00069923676,0.004283255,0.44072792,0.46147236,0.0008648896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000764065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003995063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018387426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018955338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4934448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256453476","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.017","title":"Why civil law countries might forego the individual trustee: provocative insights from the new-to-the-fold","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fold (higher-order function); Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Economics; Engineering; Public law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.031844905879955226,"score_gpt":0.2228973133682259,"score_spread":0.19105240748827068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256453476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017911872,0.00035595012,0.0002762639,0.0105291195,0.0002439323,0.0021599238,0.0007736556,0.00009627313,0.9853858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016483683,0.00010373038,0.00003090436,0.0051562507,0.0010368766,0.000018038232,0.000062831765,0.000034614866,0.9770731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980979,0.00017547958,0.00020536124,0.00049857015,0.00066430547,0.00035839182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977078,0.00061621645,0.00029680913,0.00088578154,0.00026419578,0.00022920338],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020270426,0.0003399968,0.0002812957,0.000037966372,0.0029723854,0.00047779278,0.002410691,0.000320138,0.00005615138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025624722,0.00020552697,0.00019970798,0.00003297386,0.0014695742,0.00020448366,0.0007139103,0.00064114743,0.0001484361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011545366,0.0000036649055,9.081419e-7,0.0000025798383,0.000103318765,0.0000026895193,0.006281197,0.0000016349036,7.328127e-7,0.6374195,0.35599744,0.00017478516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021337759,0.000019514635,0.000045800844,0.00005787775,0.00027514918,4.000458e-7,0.0020844892,0.0000063378448,0.000038754097,0.0012356633,0.9957254,0.0002972125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049140304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028345434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.639728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019690905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047471342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256763530","doi":"10.1017/cls.2015.28","title":"Testamentary Archeology in Late-Victorian Ontario: William Martin's Little, Posthumous Legal System","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Bequest; Estate; Executor; Context (archaeology); Ideology; Law; Probate; State (computer science); Settlor; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; History; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.019603312483894575,"score_gpt":0.26090479897381835,"score_spread":0.24130148648992378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256763530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92496234,0.00031471075,0.00001555089,0.006569125,0.0007813411,0.0002301728,0.000054931617,0.000012840728,0.06705896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938611,0.000035191224,0.00028337238,0.0017277972,0.0004384629,0.000008944337,0.0000114886425,0.000019955449,0.0036137241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982462,0.0001661097,0.00047829724,0.00022265616,0.00013580766,0.00075091264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717623,0.000116078154,0.00024367566,0.00017227951,0.0002721572,0.0020195928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016786439,0.00016032085,0.00037764292,0.000069878646,0.00049491104,0.00015002627,0.00035760633,0.00021520045,0.000056291756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092291346,0.00017735957,0.00018212711,0.00020940074,0.0005261653,0.00035829959,0.000025451594,0.0006057853,0.0000038640346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008306485,0.000016421003,0.008085451,0.000025988904,0.000052499225,0.0002354663,0.1604908,0.00005895902,0.000007701107,0.82957065,0.0012409742,0.00020677823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094094913,0.00016792407,0.0048345826,0.00012962014,0.000057538833,0.00014208168,0.05103802,0.00006160879,0.0000024544433,0.010081452,0.932222,0.00032178854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9241522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.930981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046007265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050379513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256869429","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004215","title":"Property, Corrective Justice, and the Nature of the Cause of Action in Unjust Enrichment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Action (physics); Restitution; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.026146688250142158,"score_gpt":0.3315620764756276,"score_spread":0.3054153882254854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256869429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412923,0.0019262796,0.00012340052,0.010754473,0.00081293116,0.0005193502,0.00001306743,0.0000022179997,0.04455599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991907,0.00016834657,0.00003924805,0.00025002784,0.000094711664,0.0000013989109,6.1894006e-8,0.0000026436594,0.00025284712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992276,0.000098026074,0.00024432127,0.00006031109,0.00022004958,0.00014971798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991018,0.00017798664,0.00026741668,0.00010305665,0.00021277236,0.00013693876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012167887,0.00004659828,0.00011078654,0.00004552472,0.0002719137,0.000023121096,0.00031034715,0.0000697086,0.000012263586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002175872,0.000023675866,0.00004168497,0.0002863098,0.0007256995,0.0001447255,0.000015523574,0.00034480818,3.7439028e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094113384,0.000044628363,0.02175902,0.00004676932,0.000038406106,0.00001933302,0.034594998,0.00011584807,0.00046512103,0.9370384,0.00087013806,0.0049132067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00239437,0.00021096718,0.49307895,0.00083972415,0.0005229399,0.00010846466,0.04613284,0.00007717386,0.0070476523,0.014849477,0.4343535,0.0003839476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09380454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65320146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92218894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015713078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008516856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9122299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257735315","doi":"10.32920/22227895","title":"Quantum Physics in Private Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Analogy; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Distributive justice; Distributive property; Law; Private law; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Physics; Public law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.10301482669780558,"score_gpt":0.37910199107275633,"score_spread":0.27608716437495073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257735315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25800863,0.0000032347598,0.00038904618,0.008716684,0.00006297494,0.00013982058,0.0000022867616,0.00023679357,0.73244053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952566,0.000019210429,0.00009572092,0.00025217587,0.00008332837,0.000013242924,0.000001865727,0.00000247136,0.0042753704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965763,0.00001532953,0.00004949525,0.000065606226,0.00008589974,0.00012604028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985844,0.00003047474,0.000008870228,0.000067519184,0.000007895811,0.000026822703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016149456,0.000020504087,0.00003080773,0.000008594296,0.00014258803,0.000025838312,0.0000955762,0.000017529539,0.00006011543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010408561,0.000018489114,0.00001394557,0.0004019528,0.00005617483,0.000068913556,0.00002840305,0.000035056986,0.0007721632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.6574961e-7,0.000007711806,0.0005868963,6.022675e-7,4.1471935e-7,3.6182198e-7,0.00096338516,0.00001922177,0.00006773009,0.9970772,0.00068142597,0.0005948348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054347638,0.0000021102794,0.0033876896,0.0000019846163,5.6834295e-7,1.0144332e-8,0.00082162785,0.00076469843,0.00011607054,0.20891924,0.78588337,0.00004825741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061618295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006053453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.788158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016091468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002016854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99248534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257952031","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Duties of the Crown to Maori: Will the Canadian Remedy Travel?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Waikato Law Review: Taumauri","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Indigenous; Duty; Context (archaeology); Law; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.022688905652476495,"score_gpt":0.302796489152118,"score_spread":0.2801075834996415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257952031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002996698,0.03587711,0.000006826344,0.5463376,0.000349908,0.0022864952,0.000069472444,0.000035316196,0.4120406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561024,0.012224251,0.000086601,0.019618973,0.00055876427,0.00018370083,0.000002613406,0.000016838332,0.011205895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824804,0.00028116567,0.00037264318,0.00020146553,0.00046475523,0.00043194636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985456,0.00017229843,0.0001391772,0.00079999835,0.00014497069,0.00019794611],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016034801,0.00012752021,0.00019508971,0.000013819086,0.0031446628,0.00012901891,0.0013123691,0.00006377228,0.00026736374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023208073,0.00006021552,0.00017458912,0.00047943674,0.0006424357,0.00013487772,0.000102064594,0.0002203783,0.000114023496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011752134,0.000010831349,0.00005205039,0.000023489652,0.000011163254,2.0139967e-7,0.0021608442,0.0000063664397,0.000007940324,0.90939933,0.077500455,0.010826181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032912503,0.000005604393,0.00091317407,0.0001473248,0.000028584916,9.302568e-7,0.0004129879,0.000004818443,0.00008134549,0.0017171706,0.9965598,0.00009533875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28158867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93825513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019561299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005491157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258178350","doi":"10.29173/alr355","title":"A Team Production Theory of Canadian Corporate Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Corporate governance; Stakeholder; Shareholder; Norm (philosophy); Oppression; Corporate group; Corporate security; Corporate communication; Law; Law and economics; Shareholder primacy; Corporate action; Political science; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.11170416533917271,"score_gpt":0.3185025572744551,"score_spread":0.20679839193528238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258178350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088099256,0.008381642,0.0000022164063,0.017421225,0.00012414878,0.00055469235,0.000004435048,0.000011845645,0.9726188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724166,0.009213515,0.00013358142,0.0043345867,0.00019261698,0.000077175435,0.0000146200055,0.000010781891,0.013606567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926883,0.00015599778,0.00016643181,0.00012769502,0.00013141445,0.00014965514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923414,0.000047130066,0.0001275468,0.00023511444,0.00013548086,0.00022060737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009690202,0.000053496653,0.00014193344,0.000019557705,0.00018552032,0.00001530002,0.00016983981,0.00003152648,0.00010671029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002608786,0.0000448609,0.00004144004,0.00043366212,0.00023463393,0.00012529783,0.000014552612,0.00005289813,0.00021004643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.681943e-7,0.0000105433255,0.000038964256,0.000063811414,0.00000459632,1.14439274e-7,0.0005111514,4.0497667e-7,0.0000028892405,0.98850703,0.009805314,0.001054625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024485036,0.0000067484916,0.000012991253,0.00021523924,0.00002528602,7.849876e-7,0.00008234473,3.214442e-7,0.000024871475,0.019325864,0.9802248,0.00005629552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89635503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9687242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97153556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005830746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003592887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2699792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258189201","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004872","title":"What can Kant Teach Us about Legal Classification?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.025079288045823062,"score_gpt":0.32102443089366073,"score_spread":0.2959451428478377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258189201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86949235,0.0006997039,0.000111904454,0.04314483,0.0031137357,0.00025467275,0.000034808258,0.000022530188,0.083125465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955074,0.00015930725,0.00043511394,0.0010902799,0.00088964053,0.000006097344,0.0000015969364,0.000011578809,0.0018989404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985998,0.00007560681,0.00036160825,0.00016261461,0.00036822556,0.0004320913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978225,0.000072659524,0.00026134102,0.00027734018,0.00038953644,0.0011766254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008498313,0.0001038519,0.00015664837,0.000091863694,0.0010741397,0.0008371584,0.00085164397,0.00012573543,0.00034540365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015931188,0.00009850249,0.000099780904,0.00023403305,0.0006857033,0.00097954,0.000013117777,0.00065453193,0.000048725848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019125675,0.0000163031,0.005044144,0.0000030235235,0.000010969942,0.000046807232,0.004409056,0.0000058305395,0.0010758796,0.984397,0.0026904582,0.0022986254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093987255,0.000018855206,0.022786865,0.000040814906,0.000016986125,0.000041244115,0.0013855458,0.000011301732,0.00015735699,0.0017583487,0.97355616,0.00013250862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16182274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8746646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98263866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020017839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004002444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84375876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258533185","doi":"","title":"Res Ipsa Loquitur: Some Recent Cases in Singapore and its Future","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res ipsa loquitur; Plaintiff; Circumstantial evidence; Prima facie; Presumption; Tort; Law; Contributory negligence; Accident (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016663607646441862,"score_gpt":0.3018938222634857,"score_spread":0.28523021461704384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258533185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9520505,0.017051209,0.000003978144,0.024243057,0.00008187594,0.00013933858,0.0000034294685,0.00002459634,0.006402021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88880545,0.10633015,0.000012695571,0.00019951239,0.0009532361,0.0000044064436,0.0000014226855,0.0000074319155,0.0036857065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823034,0.000097334574,0.00016894616,0.00014435376,0.00020274532,0.0011562564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970096,0.000036396308,0.000055194443,0.000070215465,0.000037881484,0.00009934422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001015144,0.00008001465,0.00010017229,0.000049014376,0.00058222754,0.0000927254,0.00017176523,0.0000761536,0.00024418277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041931344,0.00006981604,0.00003351278,0.00021427993,0.000056355984,0.0002876954,0.000014738594,0.00091720885,0.000025947165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026707436,0.000060447008,0.00055696926,0.0000022829954,0.000015556425,0.0000125700335,0.00236892,0.00001530576,0.000069088375,0.81895113,0.00029070085,0.17763034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035648345,0.000086729924,0.0013752162,0.000017204537,0.000012444006,0.00017202327,0.00840201,0.000014637731,0.000029380564,0.17687069,0.8124986,0.0001645715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005231369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021645991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8122079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050626165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012483515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258595339","doi":"","title":"Tax, Equity, and the Priority of Property Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Taxpayer; Equity (law); Liability; Legislature; Business; Law and economics; Income tax; Tax law; Double taxation; Law; Economics; Accounting; Public economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.023002571567571677,"score_gpt":0.3234787826996857,"score_spread":0.30047621113211403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258595339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30571595,0.0042259404,0.0021468627,0.11960034,0.0001422094,0.0006956005,0.0000035488206,0.000041680007,0.5674279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888405,0.0053169727,0.000023236367,0.0001632481,0.00020520174,0.0000038429102,1.3804018e-7,0.0000033240053,0.0054434934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987304,0.00011730526,0.00013218395,0.0000690504,0.00023886291,0.0007121855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996659,0.000047003065,0.000091838534,0.000084104104,0.00006321078,0.000047918864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032135341,0.000043418888,0.00008622709,0.000010630153,0.00071512995,0.00006995121,0.00028368033,0.000032247775,0.000021541664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056514516,0.000021801912,0.000046145684,0.00011635727,0.00046734934,0.000118609394,0.00010970611,0.0005582745,0.00000456846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000180976,0.000017767115,0.00036625916,8.290027e-7,0.000013384378,1.5819539e-7,0.00075085217,7.3917124e-7,0.00003298159,0.97687674,0.000026817646,0.021895364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045560376,0.000039458984,0.00023767033,0.000003830846,0.000015329591,0.000032280357,0.002202785,0.000016597762,0.000011162741,0.71953166,0.2774086,0.00004505673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009098743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050449084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6831246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016533764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009892805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259137867","doi":"","title":"Commercial relationships and the burgeoning fiduciary principle","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Unconscionability; Redress; Expansive; Project commissioning; Law; Publishing; Commercial law; Common law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.21663686483644823,"score_gpt":0.4257066596023728,"score_spread":0.20906979476592458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259137867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9281855,0.0000967571,0.000035348643,0.03957781,0.0000840369,0.0010010067,0.00025287035,0.0001349102,0.030631715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92060214,0.0011387595,0.0005593801,0.0001081345,0.00061598065,0.000007972251,0.000111371344,0.000019898655,0.076836385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952202,0.001966994,0.00029735305,0.0005308081,0.0010433277,0.0009413562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725825,0.0013099308,0.000095186704,0.0005206678,0.00036668268,0.00044929533],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037678853,0.00021117322,0.00030152593,0.00023890148,0.0049595614,0.00024163215,0.0009008093,0.00027528053,0.000979606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040428733,0.00017609983,0.00012588062,0.0012991069,0.0023206538,0.00042419578,0.0002905163,0.0017470032,0.00020608096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011922457,0.000629547,0.12434888,0.00005601699,0.00017939374,0.00012035964,0.0186187,0.00046062906,0.000020179916,0.8019551,0.036394216,0.01602473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018329774,0.00004546917,0.23056763,0.00004748023,0.000042236,0.0000065053055,0.0059668957,0.00017687056,0.0000033094996,0.0020859097,0.7589691,0.0002555841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035633188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05970943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7998692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021810649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004160106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259327368","doi":"","title":"Contract: Not Promise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florida State University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Speech act; Morality; Law and economics; Law; The Venerable; Severability; Epistemology; Economics; Political science; Exclusion clause; Philosophy; Contract management; Linguistics; Privity of contract","score_opus":0.027689701588782308,"score_gpt":0.29535828092898647,"score_spread":0.26766857934020416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259327368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01478335,0.0037559795,0.0015838534,0.013336975,0.00031432608,0.0016005068,0.000094649695,0.0002488476,0.9642815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863478,0.09105298,0.0011455024,0.0070937187,0.0004322084,0.000002849281,0.000030475663,0.000020754866,0.036743492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921715,0.000055572957,0.000120784425,0.00015554413,0.00019576873,0.00025515506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940354,0.00007423793,0.00007344257,0.00016681776,0.000105724124,0.00017624302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080837146,0.00006801853,0.00014619011,0.000016823602,0.00056614866,0.000022714157,0.00025876737,0.000030823077,0.0003265098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034046872,0.00006987337,0.00007814876,0.0002582697,0.00016633898,0.00022256751,0.00004509744,0.00010440588,0.00028010012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103109105,0.000021892203,0.000060022496,0.00011270636,0.000009126459,0.000025255113,0.0005603478,3.9441025e-7,0.000017153236,0.98717356,0.0023652092,0.009644054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012569333,0.0000057936586,0.00039949408,0.00013944857,0.000027136473,4.094854e-7,0.00009224512,0.0000010356339,0.000034364784,0.00018593279,0.9988947,0.00009375854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057363603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007635451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99652946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001362391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095688265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8671699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259391156","doi":"","title":"Common Law Within Three Federations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Federal common law; Political science; Statutory law; Statute; Jurisdiction; Federal law; Public law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Private law; Legislation","score_opus":0.01862920445623124,"score_gpt":0.31923298118839116,"score_spread":0.30060377673215993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259391156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39243937,0.0010408902,0.09836374,0.019013925,0.00044551422,0.00039007846,0.0000034348957,0.00015839859,0.48814464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962246,0.00016862419,0.000216125,0.00032358142,0.00060098665,0.0000029697287,0.0000015592176,0.000008519423,0.0024530743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805707,0.00004402774,0.00021345931,0.0000969401,0.00026534134,0.001323158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955016,0.000061293744,0.00009934216,0.00010265112,0.00007131798,0.000115233044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033828244,0.0000644559,0.00007689676,0.000031686475,0.0023268359,0.00021497576,0.00024911558,0.00006188707,0.000042236512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025519012,0.000058787216,0.0000613861,0.00017490282,0.00013156328,0.00021193972,0.000018858613,0.0010216269,0.00006658375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043317905,0.000028069106,0.00080965954,2.698493e-7,0.000015362151,7.409658e-7,0.0007842726,0.000013155245,0.00006829962,0.9949523,0.000055213186,0.0032683157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015608728,0.00004221939,0.00046843765,0.0000034347822,0.000011521319,0.000027252914,0.005485241,0.000021223888,0.000056807694,0.88704,0.106589995,0.000097757285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004218338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61041063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6061923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006553294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001377337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259441428","doi":"","title":"Book Review: A Romantic Conception of Fiduciary Obligation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Opportunism; Obligation; Accountability; Law; Romance; Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Power (physics); Political science; Function (biology); Injustice; Business; Sociology; Duty; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.009241593068408186,"score_gpt":0.30427528575924256,"score_spread":0.2950336926908344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259441428","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036818005,0.821746,0.007916378,0.10325982,0.00017565317,0.00081608555,0.000004648913,0.00008394396,0.029179506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6875168,0.302673,0.00007744466,0.002409099,0.0006514503,0.000008033918,0.0000029403418,0.000006250522,0.006654994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986653,0.000096086136,0.00024283893,0.00008572035,0.0002508626,0.0006592304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995379,0.0000253818,0.00019639629,0.00008945017,0.0001012159,0.000049675473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015005867,0.0000525743,0.000104228755,0.00003349615,0.00029870385,0.000018416296,0.00017899428,0.000039051298,0.0003210393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006842227,0.00004858263,0.00007892308,0.00017223773,0.0000782057,0.00031349726,0.000011495076,0.0004484757,0.00006283979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071894387,0.000091078764,0.00021882507,0.000029779694,0.000042944805,2.2257777e-7,0.0012516594,0.000027132412,0.00064320734,0.8693231,0.052726418,0.07563846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015263856,0.000042944812,0.00022495467,0.00011316082,0.000033406966,0.000010844302,0.0006497771,0.0000319962,0.000085109146,0.023314355,0.9752652,0.00007559065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017348665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010934878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047125728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013348758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3515155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259724464","doi":"","title":"An Intimate Approach to Fairness, Impartiality and Reasonableness in Administrative Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Administrative law; Objectivity (philosophy); Adversarial system; Objectification; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04083688280241292,"score_gpt":0.3394859486080021,"score_spread":0.29864906580558914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259724464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8816939,0.0006836869,0.0068391757,0.005438998,0.000052758092,0.0004418266,0.0000073626466,0.000050761853,0.10479154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844253,0.0005744676,0.00025677323,0.00011854145,0.00015216167,0.000022725626,0.0000012722509,0.0000070930337,0.00042441048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998132,0.00017312086,0.00017567076,0.00019474649,0.00018915055,0.0011353248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957025,0.000021880758,0.00006142566,0.000114278664,0.00004893075,0.00018321707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016941656,0.00008316689,0.00012102918,0.000034548517,0.0005374409,0.0001723145,0.00023327902,0.00005710222,0.000024934274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026782318,0.000076437966,0.000026262516,0.0002567805,0.00012685174,0.0003774177,0.000023056773,0.00058251654,0.000011513357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008607557,0.00013729007,0.0010034255,0.0000016942823,0.0000071329023,5.491165e-7,0.0033601492,0.000025389641,0.000038480222,0.9908927,0.000015992597,0.0045085642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012887039,0.0005583316,0.009442944,0.00003315896,0.000042582305,0.00012485661,0.06848481,0.0030389207,0.00017205277,0.831801,0.08421457,0.00079808955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036741416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030101031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15909176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004126385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047964914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9875971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259980794","doi":"","title":"Director Duties: A Fiduciary Duty to Confess","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Appeal; Law; Foundation (evidence); Business; Political science","score_opus":0.009044581719259485,"score_gpt":0.2896431764264464,"score_spread":0.2805985947071869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259980794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6719516,0.0019967253,0.007960836,0.036194723,0.0005600174,0.0005631542,0.000016739246,0.00020300147,0.2805532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97708493,0.0004473562,0.00009214478,0.0002591103,0.0012416053,0.000015253537,0.0000019034849,0.000011207867,0.02084649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764097,0.00009056018,0.00019033467,0.00015134565,0.00029192097,0.0016348476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995391,0.000052283096,0.000075829026,0.00011775402,0.000094259536,0.00012080898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013417264,0.000086283995,0.00011034493,0.000056605175,0.00089031056,0.00012677533,0.00032234125,0.0000577353,0.0001780074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006098333,0.00007910802,0.00008222375,0.00026123674,0.00007023456,0.00014553782,0.000030558986,0.00065963174,0.00015805499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006909261,0.00004480128,0.0009640248,7.828816e-7,0.0000144389305,9.483188e-7,0.0006830613,0.000019912288,0.00016129628,0.9926385,0.0019332294,0.003532079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018248417,0.000046924953,0.0016884883,0.000007499979,0.000013189172,0.000015773518,0.0041841287,0.000007057663,0.00007344244,0.31481722,0.67880493,0.00015884248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077526085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04834777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6778213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008540426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024630583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260037689","doi":"","title":"Fashioning Legal Authority from Power: The Crown-Native Fiduciary Relationship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Fiduciary; Law; Surrender; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Treaty; Power (physics); Crown (dentistry); State (computer science); Politics; Duty","score_opus":0.014936744912418979,"score_gpt":0.29048295718427897,"score_spread":0.27554621227186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260037689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.837153,0.0018412536,0.01211379,0.028633593,0.00035254424,0.0002817287,0.00001779594,0.00010153738,0.119504735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991345,0.00017668857,0.00011602824,0.000090840535,0.0010824583,0.000009694586,0.000007277537,0.000010779642,0.0071612704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762964,0.00032720168,0.0002478829,0.00017532462,0.00039662363,0.0012233132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991316,0.0003610268,0.00017769173,0.0001583154,0.00010682883,0.000064530344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025117272,0.00010061157,0.00009848172,0.000040605424,0.0030516468,0.00027695688,0.00044191742,0.000092842856,0.000104217965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021793078,0.00007602361,0.00011443925,0.00031253783,0.00018352729,0.00039219862,0.00003879314,0.001971429,0.00006456651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057276916,0.000028081531,0.0060448474,1.5355886e-7,0.00001945475,9.83571e-7,0.001520649,0.000044535198,0.000017182781,0.991087,0.00043968012,0.0007916686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017500237,0.000025211008,0.048879616,0.000006677223,0.000026272737,0.000010783782,0.01241082,0.000034404882,0.000013498043,0.8348311,0.10345235,0.00013421943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01230354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035635915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15625589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088277314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002256339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260124866","doi":"","title":"Suing anonymously : when is the personal price to pay for justice too high?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Anonymity; Law; Economic Justice; Harm; Political science; Test (biology); Confidentiality","score_opus":0.025923945083625437,"score_gpt":0.2897686665710277,"score_spread":0.26384472148740223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260124866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12809266,0.00010965907,0.15506862,0.40174133,0.0016237914,0.0019017485,0.0002648249,0.00018995453,0.3110074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852858,0.0000025515922,0.0036386813,0.0058081932,0.0021854683,0.000035059646,8.606156e-7,0.000013935518,0.0030294585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863666,0.00012596013,0.00020102075,0.00018157366,0.00040508513,0.00044967895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877614,0.00041245477,0.00014701241,0.00015175238,0.00020055586,0.00031211218],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013972904,0.000098117576,0.00012405695,0.000027284745,0.0031561574,0.0003991394,0.0005046442,0.000048708025,0.00021195687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003704179,0.000060132068,0.000115137256,0.00018606379,0.00014729795,0.00013623976,0.000053708944,0.00025593687,0.00007387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002468742,0.000030086649,0.00020139459,0.000008414984,0.000027524567,7.6866144e-7,0.23352687,0.000032133536,0.00006137819,0.7429298,0.018489089,0.004667837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001917916,0.000054633678,0.00027498175,0.000008451913,0.00006412375,0.0000039011097,0.02989704,0.00012937047,0.000015428483,0.016568914,0.95266306,0.00012830783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013144172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096272555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93417394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095416566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014915636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260382374","doi":"","title":"Is Duke v. Andler Still Good Law in Common Law Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Obligation; Political science; Common law; Jurisdiction; Choice of law; Argument (complex analysis); Precedent","score_opus":0.022678176565941878,"score_gpt":0.27342232861849375,"score_spread":0.25074415205255185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260382374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4477187,0.0008306064,0.000090928756,0.005681493,0.0001796379,0.0002005006,0.000014432375,0.000022956858,0.5452607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959296,0.000448942,0.000025685516,0.0010349262,0.00017657965,0.000005257137,0.0000011188839,0.00000884034,0.0023690315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799925,0.000081974315,0.00019647015,0.00012228951,0.00026187152,0.0013381614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996095,0.000025622165,0.000083181665,0.000119162876,0.00004494669,0.000117589836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086136075,0.000079566955,0.000115094896,0.000021426611,0.00049727014,0.000044194407,0.00033019902,0.000056587993,0.00017833141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000057656084,0.00007298839,0.000042325937,0.0001661665,0.00010571839,0.00017405419,0.000027548758,0.00091777544,0.000016968024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051415986,0.000034096796,0.0040758727,6.510631e-7,0.00001411675,0.000002475471,0.001522194,0.000001024391,0.0000091818565,0.9934709,0.00020983054,0.000654524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003187594,0.00004881293,0.0019239223,0.000008523235,0.0000120921195,0.000017139153,0.0052704904,0.000007657056,0.000111278,0.55117524,0.44094837,0.00015773447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.957155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99914694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5482109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012037918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00367569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6520516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260504655","doi":"10.29173/alr1280","title":"Constitutional Accommodation and the Rule(s) of Courts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial independence; Political science; Law; Separation of powers; Judicial review; Constitutional court; Legislature; Judicial activism; Rule of law; Supreme court; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.02170901885517248,"score_gpt":0.32662018382578567,"score_spread":0.3049111649706132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260504655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020406344,0.034525376,0.00009831389,0.17954017,0.00003662712,0.00068601116,0.000006440854,0.000009842183,0.78305656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96726334,0.02715452,0.00017669395,0.004685736,0.00008869467,0.000036722362,0.0000054540783,0.0000012725926,0.000587545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995681,0.000066866174,0.0001370803,0.00006170334,0.00010552292,0.000060751416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948376,0.00027778276,0.000067980705,0.0001032636,0.00004014056,0.000027073576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004345987,0.00003226477,0.000100907506,0.000002130744,0.00024835835,0.000014893287,0.00010382085,0.000016615248,0.00022870123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010940085,0.000020392517,0.000033792712,0.00005583171,0.0010058891,0.000103376624,0.000022728898,0.00003507553,0.000046300363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.3867125e-7,0.000007859934,0.00003286036,0.000030457468,0.0000038194294,9.483333e-9,0.00018396646,7.719489e-7,8.987387e-7,0.9927018,0.00046294206,0.0065738587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010571344,8.8482113e-7,0.00006991986,0.00012999201,0.000024798486,7.326719e-7,0.000009014919,0.00001059068,0.00000429802,0.0028115395,0.99680555,0.000026957357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006341994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051288176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010314366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000404843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.958724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260695609","doi":"","title":"Restitutionary Recovery Ex Aquo Et Bono. Roxborough V Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Law; Common law; Statutory law; Political science; Schism","score_opus":0.030538984284305452,"score_gpt":0.3327938246151876,"score_spread":0.3022548403308821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260695609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5990451,0.0037838365,0.019079642,0.022208627,0.00083288696,0.00086155906,0.00004340414,0.00012277073,0.35402215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97651154,0.0040684934,0.00059586,0.00015670942,0.00021440636,0.000007944821,0.000004034695,0.000011249419,0.018429758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764526,0.00025601004,0.00031241027,0.0001750993,0.00033750618,0.0012737443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993342,0.0000658124,0.00020011386,0.00016980903,0.00011685977,0.00011315924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002386662,0.00010955774,0.00015012684,0.00006108475,0.00043734294,0.000058737416,0.00030966004,0.00010746713,0.00024838376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017563956,0.000104597,0.00013701734,0.00025334547,0.00015895315,0.0004379217,0.000019623321,0.0009991857,0.00006989764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011452249,0.00007021123,0.0013043019,0.0000028858099,0.00003795449,0.0000016493498,0.00030084306,0.00014928181,0.0001774152,0.99670476,0.0007241519,0.00051507144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003281291,0.0001351567,0.0022820032,0.000021919272,0.000035916753,0.00005956985,0.0020596888,0.0000043807636,0.000095234805,0.5391922,0.45560157,0.00018425484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017900912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010443481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45751262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006975641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037471266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6647242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260835105","doi":"","title":"A U.S. Perspective on the Contextual Terrain of Political Economy in Insolvency Reform","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Politics; Creditor; Legislature; Political economy; Power (physics); Debtor; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Economy; Market economy; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.016216673716218714,"score_gpt":0.32221727351264035,"score_spread":0.30600059979642164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260835105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28888184,0.0003092566,0.00079694873,0.037279032,0.000037923313,0.00020971928,0.0000020067694,0.000009979505,0.6724733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987357,0.00009866122,0.000010710153,0.00040697577,0.00023167432,0.000004157624,2.1651589e-7,0.0000048618176,0.00050704007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815166,0.000072579154,0.00021827647,0.00009536912,0.00014905389,0.0013130577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995304,0.00013841137,0.000088045876,0.00009166541,0.00007723332,0.00007429636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00323378,0.000059422782,0.00009357607,0.00007034624,0.0002674296,0.000022915583,0.00027367723,0.000050588627,0.00003485592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001240686,0.000040587365,0.00007027109,0.00017226193,0.00020654786,0.00009293938,0.000017902188,0.0009905595,0.000011510683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018044899,0.000059254955,0.0002801683,3.1860623e-7,0.000012333851,5.4047774e-7,0.0040595033,3.3042946e-7,0.000020690131,0.99446,0.000011649869,0.001077177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002117858,0.00012242253,0.0016364016,0.000009231117,0.0000035958647,0.000008169442,0.18019417,0.0000040232776,0.00006700075,0.8087413,0.008945454,0.0000564847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00930442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0689684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7098538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004421734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001801761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261090877","doi":"","title":"Solicitors’ Conflict of Interest and the Wider Fiduciary Question","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Conflict of interest; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.08933030811814388,"score_gpt":0.42236889376882125,"score_spread":0.33303858565067734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261090877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8649462,0.00023173989,0.0014851036,0.017826552,0.000094234485,0.00019986168,8.859342e-7,0.000028509074,0.11518691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966702,0.000073270625,0.00010285835,0.00017818729,0.00016426595,0.0000029625546,3.9001682e-7,0.0000023156424,0.0028055734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996712,0.000045392182,0.0000735258,0.000057321533,0.0000645256,0.00008803326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996178,0.00018600273,0.00004556972,0.000082085346,0.000034400116,0.00003414267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008327021,0.000028404884,0.000052206997,0.000011962593,0.00015619089,0.000017249178,0.00007835654,0.000029832212,0.00003131257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010638227,0.000019454226,0.00001752903,0.00007589778,0.00034184338,0.000035127232,0.000025458228,0.000054331784,0.0000072669663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013585639,0.00001037361,0.00085255736,0.0000025423985,0.0000042182596,1.7321365e-7,0.03111292,7.934456e-7,0.0004417142,0.9641956,0.0009102421,0.002455242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005305997,0.00001862591,0.031638652,0.000026384492,0.000019892894,0.0000010615242,0.023882585,0.00005674507,0.0022318284,0.008147513,0.9333404,0.00010573425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013552238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006015155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95604813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001216496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021735048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261148905","doi":"","title":"Characterization of Proprietary Restitution in the Conflict of Laws","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Private law; Law; Constructive trust; Conflict of laws; Municipal law; Wrongdoing; Common law; Political science; Public law; Philosophy of law; International law; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03096040995422185,"score_gpt":0.31168084110781424,"score_spread":0.2807204311535924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261148905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929886,0.00035227786,0.0011850289,0.0017011099,0.00004311891,0.00015067775,0.000001644575,0.0000033803021,0.003574153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844867,0.0011723047,0.0000144250935,0.000031979805,0.00017672722,0.000004381944,0.0000028040783,0.0000020150146,0.00014670848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990089,0.00012595276,0.00016568162,0.000033651144,0.00018818522,0.00047761705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996997,0.00002149062,0.00014611387,0.000064095824,0.00004841549,0.000020150675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024905954,0.00003032768,0.0000588287,0.00003061015,0.0001343362,0.00000863463,0.00016043599,0.000033018427,0.000009638105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043309727,0.000021138188,0.000029743527,0.00018801291,0.00009384991,0.00020980008,0.000007416078,0.00033842574,0.000002472449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005486269,0.0000633086,0.009013037,0.000002267907,0.000006150351,3.3281605e-8,0.005170706,0.0000020107561,0.014055067,0.9693359,0.000002617308,0.0023434213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014989661,0.00044167193,0.47126597,0.00011262698,0.00012641674,0.000085168744,0.048721146,0.000063699656,0.013054749,0.15988068,0.30429357,0.00045534034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075193914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012835355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8094552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012101058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007138285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14703102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261212663","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 1999-2000 Term","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Administrative law; Political science; Standard of review; Discretion; High Court; Judicial deference; Intervention (counseling); Medicine","score_opus":0.021061939131649367,"score_gpt":0.32250973499181324,"score_spread":0.30144779586016385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261212663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45631298,0.000900142,0.000048131027,0.008390235,0.000062135565,0.0002732358,0.0000027161668,0.000025878564,0.53398454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833046,0.0021336863,0.000031817788,0.0003029602,0.0001830928,0.000014538536,0.0000010616279,0.0000056270546,0.014022592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998191,0.000117441305,0.00017809596,0.00010759167,0.00022758498,0.0011782644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973685,0.00004319308,0.000051911782,0.00008304778,0.000023346347,0.000061649625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012649549,0.00006972186,0.00007153519,0.00002061586,0.0008613167,0.00010256796,0.00036617057,0.000044245673,0.0002720488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013201937,0.000049502036,0.00004102049,0.00021135293,0.00014029481,0.00016051534,0.000011400701,0.0008851627,0.00012725178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009883088,0.00004091683,0.0011070743,2.7559085e-7,0.000015592388,0.0000014348576,0.0054852534,0.000004523712,0.000009319619,0.949898,0.00004409654,0.043383654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003489165,0.0000521966,0.008072244,0.000011295626,0.000008031487,0.000034221022,0.0074749617,0.0000032446462,0.000026410922,0.1974792,0.7863403,0.00014899035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022756457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08244779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092796894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045055286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9342951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261216919","doi":"","title":"Keeping Settlements Secret","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florida State University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Plaintiff; Human settlement; Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Arbitration; Private rights; Civil litigation; Public interest; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Engineering; Payment","score_opus":0.024308332495932443,"score_gpt":0.2929339959611649,"score_spread":0.2686256634652324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261216919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035596197,0.00471469,0.0010173649,0.022600332,0.00019241899,0.000906971,0.00011084716,0.00022262766,0.9666751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57543063,0.33877888,0.0030413752,0.038820215,0.0006939729,0.000004147834,0.00019805055,0.00002842174,0.04300433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992727,0.00008722204,0.000096317664,0.00015306509,0.00018147982,0.00020920092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995742,0.000020055406,0.00005923759,0.0001616725,0.00006419317,0.00012068254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028893302,0.00006501789,0.00012995077,0.000015644178,0.0006285638,0.000027306442,0.000265765,0.000021164877,0.00033855048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014638014,0.00007121,0.000068512,0.0002772774,0.000072192575,0.00024155906,0.000036731264,0.000080818616,0.00020634636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024100516,0.00001816212,0.00003714593,0.00007444428,0.000009573209,0.000010567232,0.0005782193,0.0000025128566,0.0000068297486,0.9760357,0.010766167,0.012458281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008112806,0.000009257008,0.00020459495,0.0002130085,0.00002261127,2.0385649e-7,0.00008991917,0.0000029948767,0.0000042604324,0.0011721243,0.9981103,0.00008958164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014612654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008470304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98734415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013692571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007310938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4834468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261242864","doi":"","title":"The Adulteration of Fiduciary Doctrine in Corporate Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Fiduciary; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Corporate law; Context (archaeology); Law; Accountability; Law and economics; Political science; Duty of loyalty; Corporate governance; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.011077553194458594,"score_gpt":0.26854009897173026,"score_spread":0.2574625457772717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261242864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89953184,0.0021492774,0.0013744642,0.015901739,0.00015456001,0.00029382927,0.000003135573,0.000022398546,0.08056872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642533,0.0012942114,0.000023075516,0.000031796408,0.00026964466,0.0000047572917,0.0000017088499,0.0000032356377,0.0019462202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988305,0.00009275688,0.00020554534,0.00006105412,0.00016558653,0.00064457447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961317,0.000052327603,0.0001790415,0.00006961225,0.00006711617,0.000018754934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016985118,0.000039734743,0.000056835783,0.00002237493,0.00050951156,0.000053837608,0.000172435,0.000028425693,0.000007074335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000209366,0.000028698672,0.000035269175,0.00019376827,0.00010638297,0.00012523898,0.000010515722,0.00043569904,0.0000061838973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068989075,0.00002226978,0.0010233942,3.8762892e-7,0.0000034489178,2.395367e-7,0.00014222339,0.00006258513,0.00017315222,0.99596554,0.000048909413,0.0025509517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023778797,0.000034129538,0.0023928818,0.000005792686,0.0000044750577,0.0000057492307,0.0012248609,0.000055744385,0.0001741915,0.93463194,0.061178178,0.000054270666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008544967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23150261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22295764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029298055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086970243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99805725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261428912","doi":"","title":"A Critical Notice of the Law and Ethics of Restitution by Hanoch Dagan","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Notice; Unjust enrichment; Common law; Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02004582140499659,"score_gpt":0.3581250770824387,"score_spread":0.33807925567744207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261428912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82894075,0.0034491948,0.03871263,0.054765854,0.00026547856,0.00029322674,0.000012424563,0.00002049529,0.07353996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989026,0.0005157942,0.00008512294,0.00017428397,0.0000850381,4.2570724e-7,1.9548577e-7,0.0000026259772,0.00023390826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988757,0.000104352715,0.00016211695,0.000060053473,0.0002731992,0.00052461016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937814,0.00025754978,0.000102316386,0.000074078336,0.00014132702,0.00004660952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038634052,0.000034795354,0.000061192106,0.0000128127895,0.00054357445,0.000019296906,0.00016780477,0.00008065923,0.000004708666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056935503,0.000025571524,0.000033585988,0.00013627428,0.0006481285,0.000091909,0.00002380475,0.0010266687,6.561725e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005871846,0.000024602743,0.00024137141,0.0000033818962,0.0000061990377,6.969886e-8,0.0012982715,0.0000010866431,0.0021979704,0.9958102,0.000018324461,0.00039265433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003117837,0.00012737952,0.0018117018,0.000043375418,0.00006768478,0.00003503515,0.012466426,0.000017902534,0.004951074,0.92756194,0.052490883,0.00011482602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017163366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017823238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16996187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013586602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011548887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99457854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261825313","doi":"","title":"Sovereignty's Promise -- 'Fiduciary Relationships and the Presumption of Trust'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Obligation; Presumption; Sovereignty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; State (computer science); Business; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.03965746575257893,"score_gpt":0.27014454013450667,"score_spread":0.23048707438192773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261825313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81493473,0.0025817957,0.0026508945,0.0033980082,0.00008249373,0.00055763446,0.0000030933443,0.00003125775,0.17576012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99507594,0.003019006,0.00011076135,0.000018799208,0.00013031557,0.000010483993,4.4424814e-7,0.0000048817656,0.0016293757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988108,0.0002620745,0.00017263938,0.000080387355,0.00016420036,0.0005098986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995545,0.000087484215,0.0001536844,0.00009804544,0.00006009577,0.00004620388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035544785,0.00004829989,0.000077431185,0.000027534974,0.0007868226,0.000025208159,0.0001785391,0.000049390987,0.00006552636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016396533,0.00003268958,0.000050779614,0.00010503465,0.0002993267,0.0001794181,0.000021505215,0.0007312767,0.000006671684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004175883,0.000021310114,0.0026765792,0.0000011883614,0.000021761676,6.09687e-8,0.006408263,9.269073e-7,0.000009917609,0.9879912,0.000017244682,0.0028097644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005124569,0.00002247844,0.0074447165,0.0000058743326,0.00003370669,0.000011347275,0.008381676,0.000034256023,0.000024648372,0.9813514,0.0021288318,0.000048602433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007799841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001939492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18014123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012168062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080115267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6051683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262036474","doi":"","title":"The Non Liability of a Bank (in England) and the (Potential) Liability of the State (in Israel): Pure Economic Loss in Light of Recent Developments - A Comparative Analysis and Evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; State (computer science); Business; Limited liability; Actuarial science; Economics; Law and economics; Accounting; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.011696121088040912,"score_gpt":0.3038663015165471,"score_spread":0.2921701804285062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262036474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947876,0.0005769458,0.00005980356,0.0035845072,0.000015706271,0.0005045959,0.00000327495,7.270734e-7,0.00046684337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641615,0.0035161555,0.000012233244,0.000007995492,0.000009871487,0.000010179066,5.5099594e-7,0.0000011661868,0.00002570312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803364,0.0007580201,0.0004866597,0.00013027029,0.00022709067,0.0003642921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992164,0.000175445,0.00033528215,0.00013860334,0.00011276719,0.000021512997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009902093,0.00006537515,0.00023248896,0.00006066092,0.00017009495,0.000022611772,0.00022231223,0.000034510314,0.0000053070235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108912,0.000035494904,0.000058999074,0.00046250725,0.0002787677,0.00008797993,0.00003102644,0.0003896032,1.13858476e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008863311,0.00049760763,0.68381405,0.00001672478,0.0003984542,2.0508755e-7,0.09598979,0.007653648,0.0005872991,0.13646334,0.0000025554796,0.07368998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016334268,0.000053651038,0.7215788,0.000015702177,0.000081583974,9.4752744e-7,0.005075118,0.0037715493,0.00030444952,0.26705676,0.0003657491,0.00006227525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004326554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26467404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2603475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064295775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013995788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7487438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262085723","doi":"","title":"THE BOUNDARIES OF FIDUCIARY ACCOUNTABILITY","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Opportunism; Commonwealth; Accountability; Confusion; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01171805041878654,"score_gpt":0.30673667095765245,"score_spread":0.2950186205388659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262085723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9249997,0.004397473,0.0039479667,0.036214516,0.00035126304,0.00026010757,0.0000046376526,0.000038179543,0.029786162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965603,0.0024530415,0.000035861747,0.00004378646,0.00023362755,0.0000038117978,2.9320196e-7,0.0000037506347,0.00066557515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985393,0.00005918894,0.00016714196,0.00007072215,0.00025208006,0.00091151654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995591,0.00006645509,0.00010480038,0.00012593098,0.0001039813,0.00003973807],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027212517,0.000044721895,0.0000633397,0.000012752727,0.0024587638,0.0001720354,0.00034329327,0.000035001583,0.000014378113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014305992,0.000030263556,0.00006914211,0.00014732714,0.0006054185,0.00015497937,0.000023905046,0.000621355,0.000011400181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006101793,0.000021797587,0.00045490553,5.20766e-7,0.000014884228,5.0238192e-8,0.0016549792,0.000009396208,0.000032148855,0.9914071,0.000027290596,0.0063708196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010670558,0.00002468263,0.000905808,0.0000024421743,0.0000065195068,0.0000051438906,0.009755053,4.393813e-7,0.000051820716,0.7875463,0.2015593,0.000035806923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045751957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06724864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20386083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007456225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00833784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263216756","doi":"","title":"Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Towards a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Private law; Common law; Law; Legislation; Service (business); Freedom of contract; Business; Public law; Goods and services; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.012837399514260193,"score_gpt":0.32172676528733735,"score_spread":0.30888936577307713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263216756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663087,0.00029691146,0.00093027623,0.014804795,0.00010971998,0.00051512447,0.0000038371727,0.000009485795,0.017021136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784064,0.0007321536,0.000035770274,0.00017415652,0.00019325268,0.0000204423,0.0000011149816,0.0000052129,0.000997266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845624,0.0001599185,0.00020243696,0.00009263378,0.00031903313,0.0007697604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948955,0.00009005942,0.00012339497,0.0000905971,0.00011191296,0.00009447827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023310538,0.00006250145,0.00012608114,0.000029513303,0.0007290417,0.00005865812,0.00019749526,0.000038627168,0.000027096063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056698664,0.000040188203,0.000044727218,0.0001585938,0.0002180538,0.00014791083,0.000040147646,0.0005724983,0.00000368602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009695058,0.00013124115,0.002911396,0.000001061235,0.000021877022,3.6994393e-7,0.008601708,0.000009007327,0.000058198755,0.9770707,0.00003264537,0.011064832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004923366,0.00064117496,0.0876315,0.00004725422,0.00012485561,0.00004621361,0.08907943,0.00039679906,0.000056355788,0.7556818,0.06107994,0.00029128318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01968641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12148498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22138889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025264348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011425447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98684156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263490682","doi":"","title":"프랑스채권법개정시안에서의 채무의 양태와 채무의 소멸","year":2009,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"민사법학","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Obligation; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02640892516646573,"score_gpt":0.3345924263814202,"score_spread":0.3081835012149545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263490682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22220196,0.0009682604,0.00032159296,0.07069432,0.0007218509,0.00064232585,0.00006537689,0.00024706236,0.70413727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96530294,0.0003965408,0.00032400785,0.0023219727,0.0012213404,0.000012465165,0.000009581873,0.000012329907,0.03039881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982242,0.00008719111,0.00029805404,0.00039826467,0.0004314999,0.0005607873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990077,0.00007529684,0.00012458146,0.0004337363,0.000085561056,0.0002731237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037993214,0.00018130911,0.00021310164,0.000043778844,0.0008329783,0.0002320149,0.00057317805,0.00019344891,0.0014850191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000722687,0.00017748903,0.00016036202,0.0005475197,0.0002025635,0.00023034745,0.00006701204,0.00026598494,0.003329036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013814039,0.00045142896,0.001711267,0.000013982145,0.000030737654,0.000013231097,0.012200723,0.000027416334,0.0013074201,0.837742,0.03802635,0.10846167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021416573,0.000074722826,0.019572588,0.00002363779,0.00003322381,0.0000012555386,0.0011895978,0.000116701805,0.00023064406,0.013238135,0.9650259,0.00027940414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014584375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005051101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92699957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111754896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020259843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263527779","doi":"","title":"Black v Chretien and Suit Against a Minister of the Crown for Abuse of Power, Misfeasance in Public Office and Negligence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Appeal; Law; Prime minister; Ex parte; Power (physics); High Court; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.013301505107876907,"score_gpt":0.26814582984230567,"score_spread":0.25484432473442875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263527779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900041,0.0014001608,0.00024845495,0.0024452785,0.0000210334,0.00021923392,0.000006138567,0.0000029747534,0.0056525823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760956,0.0015693422,0.00004772735,0.0000565841,0.000045870107,0.0000053007197,3.8632908e-7,0.000004818141,0.0006603874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988799,0.00005031501,0.000217423,0.00010477326,0.0001533262,0.00059423305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995501,0.00006462724,0.00017220336,0.00009171518,0.00008665463,0.00003468078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008825787,0.000056961122,0.00010433375,0.000034600856,0.000191737,0.00004156399,0.00022311877,0.00004461312,0.0000023635814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005172632,0.000043203454,0.00004283342,0.00019607291,0.00035175734,0.00012324892,0.000022470274,0.0002533377,2.4352323e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032833155,0.00010132985,0.010310443,0.000013811237,0.000014481404,1.06745645e-7,0.0030730767,0.000012196762,0.0015391677,0.98280966,0.00007714461,0.0020157653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004677135,0.0006594822,0.2612133,0.0002903813,0.00009308587,0.00004754874,0.049478658,0.000546505,0.0024524229,0.41752243,0.26217845,0.00084059837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000772838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016445119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56528723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001603002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083326927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9176762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263586990","doi":"10.29173/alr357","title":"Holmes on Law and Morality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Conflation; Terminology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.09505315307533091,"score_gpt":0.38261388789132444,"score_spread":0.28756073481599354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263586990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018807126,0.011693151,9.589089e-7,0.0390877,0.000040394076,0.00029402846,0.0000024397423,0.000018040915,0.94698256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544732,0.0135206925,0.00008222241,0.027785717,0.00011997401,0.00004840083,0.0000051948728,0.00000667029,0.003957909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940187,0.00009425343,0.000110864436,0.00013327226,0.00014021697,0.00011951325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994814,0.00010410602,0.000038687092,0.00018912306,0.000036506415,0.0001502256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004279258,0.000054680688,0.00013040921,0.00000264675,0.00020522687,0.000042491567,0.00012208191,0.000027051732,0.00007063626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010931773,0.000042622167,0.000032189022,0.00008758678,0.00019214503,0.000103821025,0.00003278008,0.000052727846,0.0002856754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.6568184e-7,0.000016414597,0.00004348573,0.0000453715,0.0000023025723,1.7457992e-7,0.00018729037,5.805187e-8,3.0525976e-7,0.9946578,0.003990214,0.0010562135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043682623,0.000009486368,0.00005765273,0.00016795864,0.000014434373,3.495127e-7,0.000021693399,6.5649243e-7,0.000003257014,0.005503966,0.9941174,0.000059488044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094243325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05195396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99012715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000203786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032876454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9653454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263597306","doi":"","title":"Costs for Self-Represented Litigants: Principles, Interests and Agendas","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Denial; Representation (politics); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.035859447332855496,"score_gpt":0.3187961777446608,"score_spread":0.2829367304118053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263597306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691436,0.0021095097,0.006690125,0.0074386504,0.00016805237,0.0006489312,0.000013562672,0.00013428763,0.01365326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845174,0.008621967,0.00037395253,0.00010414671,0.000458759,0.00002462918,0.0000032871894,0.000014476659,0.005881401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791783,0.000087043816,0.00021396994,0.00018857239,0.00021205016,0.0013805168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993688,0.000098655546,0.000116994845,0.00012143319,0.00012507058,0.00016907041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001184549,0.000096133794,0.00012204139,0.00005370963,0.001265736,0.000074081116,0.00026448493,0.000068871115,0.00001612509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016794838,0.00008810836,0.00007577973,0.00014579164,0.00014428144,0.00023241609,0.00004972441,0.000604343,0.000013354107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023633798,0.000090931266,0.004954617,0.0000039481006,0.00009685376,0.0000032620349,0.0030865758,0.0000023973116,0.000106505846,0.9850326,0.0006116793,0.0059869643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001361274,0.00024038945,0.0056046313,0.00002888014,0.000053483585,0.00043797446,0.008078975,0.00020380199,0.0001426864,0.10432483,0.8791794,0.0003436646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006381639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007127653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8807078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000716462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019637065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9735145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263918394","doi":"","title":"Class Actions Against the Crown: A Substitution for Judicial Review on Administrative Law Grounds","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Private law; Public law; Law; Obligation; Political science; Administrative law; Common law; Commercial law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06457358110963303,"score_gpt":0.3914400727829227,"score_spread":0.3268664916732897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263918394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036094006,0.014595204,0.0984715,0.1329932,0.0012697916,0.0034991633,0.000043034437,0.00018128393,0.71285284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98110753,0.0141529925,0.000030682197,0.0022374154,0.0011858759,0.00004051172,0.000005781911,0.000007870048,0.0012313268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981023,0.00009047439,0.00024314459,0.00013457618,0.0002817673,0.0011477363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992815,0.00019855516,0.00017251365,0.000119507145,0.00014109873,0.000086799395],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003884098,0.00009030156,0.00011102663,0.000025864061,0.002704856,0.00009249167,0.00027730677,0.00006410736,0.000014900876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014318814,0.000064011416,0.00014953518,0.00025656604,0.00021119432,0.00017340422,0.0000098062255,0.00093338516,0.000022399014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028135024,0.00004524248,0.0000055386804,0.0000043489276,0.0000268792,3.4094296e-7,0.00024359376,0.0000038084117,0.000039867216,0.9926183,0.00040200513,0.0065819267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019250384,0.00014969138,0.00008319646,0.000070222515,0.000045403962,0.000013416235,0.0026880905,0.0000054440243,0.00003814561,0.12037969,0.8762378,0.0000963667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000320473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049949434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010931978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022805138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264095370","doi":"10.29173/alr371","title":"The Use of Foreign Forms to Circumvent Local Liability Rules","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Liability; Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.11660764378653873,"score_gpt":0.35496270349597714,"score_spread":0.2383550597094384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264095370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016004656,0.030158011,0.002505689,0.08526288,0.0002477728,0.0052541415,0.00003766377,0.00006604986,0.86046314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98245186,0.009145981,0.0004945878,0.004193344,0.000089046225,0.00024615388,0.000008197291,0.000012297955,0.0033585634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909383,0.00010370242,0.00025830016,0.00012944065,0.00023407479,0.00018064659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987948,0.00042856307,0.00007672087,0.00038806605,0.00013423657,0.00017764096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000837985,0.000061556304,0.00016113276,0.0000037667085,0.00025517706,0.000042711014,0.00030653668,0.00002854161,0.000036782945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064255774,0.00003631744,0.00009035988,0.00016282607,0.00026154905,0.00014245954,0.00007528975,0.000049715607,0.0001780352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012566471,0.000020361056,0.00013494283,0.000059483413,0.0000045400902,4.827658e-8,0.0002409418,0.0000035688345,3.4124656e-7,0.977628,0.0039703436,0.017936157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028598377,0.0000148359195,0.0000723622,0.00016816419,0.000016935768,2.3023426e-7,0.00008048547,0.000008537751,0.000006652936,0.010661762,0.98888856,0.00005290238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041089606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047646463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006240488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9697315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264400092","doi":"","title":"The Crumbling Wall of Bhadauria: If Not Today, Tomorrow","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Harm; Trespass; Supreme court; Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.014788186764029097,"score_gpt":0.30091393290305213,"score_spread":0.28612574613902303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264400092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6663338,0.0060897474,0.006272629,0.21150914,0.0005019888,0.000615132,0.0000055899563,0.00011153211,0.10856044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99051744,0.0049405494,0.00005922658,0.00023744252,0.00039993087,0.0000021367987,4.1955812e-7,0.0000051630186,0.00383771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796563,0.000089679976,0.00023697731,0.00009791313,0.00034293934,0.0012668846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994124,0.000100924124,0.00016633289,0.00013976151,0.0001067855,0.0000738048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024654293,0.00006826738,0.00009759504,0.00002700495,0.0012123471,0.000101666184,0.00048404312,0.000053897264,0.000024660158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120466415,0.000048222886,0.00010388961,0.00021077618,0.00009607801,0.0001402941,0.000017143679,0.0008465162,0.000015350846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011480294,0.000026174252,0.00008557329,3.3213217e-7,0.000015506077,2.9152827e-7,0.00077553035,0.000019224586,0.00042349796,0.9620523,0.00015489987,0.03643518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032631058,0.00017764494,0.0012323107,0.00001225198,0.000028543483,0.000022488604,0.0066915313,0.00007996853,0.00043303552,0.6888761,0.3019758,0.0001440468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007790274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073549864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3241836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003813735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017990144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93245155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264515086","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Accountability of Ordinary Employees","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Mistake; Key (lock); Law and economics; Business; Relation (database); Accounting; Duty; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.014882668924715103,"score_gpt":0.3319998894889402,"score_spread":0.3171172205642251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264515086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602474,0.0020900227,0.002514158,0.0043397043,0.00016945711,0.0001563071,0.0000016286627,0.000024973613,0.030456368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956706,0.002520879,0.00004636992,0.00003337716,0.0003787083,0.0000020905936,3.3222193e-7,0.000005362194,0.0013422454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980561,0.00008073123,0.00023639179,0.000086901346,0.00029299856,0.0012468408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992771,0.00025861926,0.00013099247,0.00014926158,0.00012427122,0.00005975549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074672573,0.000053882635,0.00007471696,0.000023840144,0.001212449,0.000044459408,0.0004163171,0.00004730544,0.000023660701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014854284,0.000036749912,0.00008438814,0.00021908067,0.00024801993,0.00014019008,0.000034390247,0.0007309515,0.000010795976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023442866,0.000056820176,0.006908806,9.696171e-7,0.000026593969,2.664477e-7,0.0010144259,0.0000018878113,0.00011300714,0.9445834,0.00015569206,0.04711466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016478807,0.00011106556,0.016775237,0.0000056860404,0.000017751137,0.000016971875,0.024401683,0.000002179316,0.00013715474,0.65712005,0.30114198,0.00010544551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018483648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0384555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3009863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005072634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019662383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97909015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264785532","doi":"","title":"Breach of Contract and the Concept of Wrongdoing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Unconscionability; Mistake; Damages; Wrongdoing; Law and economics; Law; Unjust enrichment; Duty; Doctrine; Contract theory; Simplicity; Simple (philosophy); Political science; Economics; Restitution; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012408276543079546,"score_gpt":0.2764690607138822,"score_spread":0.2640607841708027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264785532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767671,0.0040700836,0.0015157363,0.0037696224,0.00003362492,0.00014313517,0.0000022093516,0.000006519676,0.013691917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952312,0.004085573,0.000025687688,0.000030142195,0.000101487334,0.0000013976187,1.8288108e-7,0.0000027824715,0.0005215253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990768,0.00009467322,0.00016352197,0.000047887188,0.00016427916,0.00045287856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954313,0.00014110835,0.00015957803,0.000059089278,0.00006702645,0.000030054056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013060956,0.000035341764,0.00010896632,0.000015098728,0.0003935155,0.000008356455,0.00015323174,0.000026349047,0.000016642443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006944061,0.000023097751,0.00005266278,0.00008299654,0.00062454987,0.0000746508,0.000013935383,0.00039667252,7.6100383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015217135,0.000014304999,0.0011680465,5.3839904e-7,0.000024912368,1.4623356e-7,0.0049459673,0.0000049810687,0.000103237646,0.9888359,0.000017595901,0.0048691765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009244958,0.00053193135,0.024041282,0.00006419567,0.00020080412,0.00071708433,0.068366535,0.00027613956,0.0019333989,0.8187427,0.075434215,0.00044676484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024757723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016097766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17009318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007378719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011062889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37426436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264824941","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Law and Non-Economic Interests","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.010751328188536278,"score_gpt":0.2949136895448647,"score_spread":0.2841623613563284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264824941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8017948,0.0009028801,0.0010789154,0.008485043,0.00015912241,0.000115910814,0.0000014879049,0.000029001696,0.1874328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903095,0.0058495575,0.000026887305,0.00027442182,0.00053127034,0.000002975153,5.419354e-7,0.0000063031257,0.0029985867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875987,0.00003277813,0.00011434254,0.00010431803,0.00007507923,0.00091363327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997415,0.000025956668,0.000054925214,0.000072226634,0.000017088058,0.000088285145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078517984,0.00005479856,0.00006882005,0.00002490309,0.00060309964,0.00010150628,0.0001779007,0.000041458876,0.000075433265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009640021,0.00005150618,0.000037182173,0.000048100024,0.00011014923,0.00020608334,0.000028688277,0.0005437198,0.00007997919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054650077,0.000011244716,0.0012996712,3.526087e-7,0.000018715744,0.0000010057768,0.00058281183,0.000003384018,0.000027535276,0.9910734,0.00013818439,0.0068382015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031780597,0.00006282848,0.0014158621,0.000007774087,0.000016234839,0.00011554092,0.004358616,0.000050676805,0.000013389548,0.54112995,0.452369,0.00014230469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037844782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08190017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4522308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004909762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008895069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9348528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265282365","doi":"","title":"Of Priors and of Disconnects: How 'Chicago' Premises Risk Distortion","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Prior probability; Undoing; Proposition; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Psychology; Bayesian probability","score_opus":0.01295997421133903,"score_gpt":0.2638875613829454,"score_spread":0.25092758717160635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265282365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737977,0.0001446917,0.0011033027,0.0018313112,0.00006123032,0.00022513178,0.000040165658,0.000030427129,0.022766076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843526,0.0001088921,0.00048692923,0.000034172743,0.000108396795,0.000013979178,0.0000033058873,0.0000060894417,0.0008030039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923456,0.000116458585,0.00015876269,0.0001582973,0.000198542,0.00013340099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928254,0.00013948575,0.00019871569,0.00020644422,0.000059155678,0.00011366374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043034428,0.00006430061,0.00014294006,0.000017431916,0.0002473014,0.000037155372,0.00015665827,0.000058021968,0.000045100314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043323234,0.00005664025,0.000047767615,0.00011578178,0.0003616249,0.00019139289,0.000044042637,0.00009374699,0.0000046102286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011318465,0.00007235087,0.04180251,0.00004641052,0.000017169827,8.815142e-8,0.0024221633,0.000014097426,0.0023301106,0.9487659,0.00036178707,0.004156122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008068882,0.00016413315,0.12257314,0.0001083783,0.00011913568,5.144586e-7,0.0033894915,0.00014517132,0.012154508,0.031016717,0.8291366,0.00038530744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006032054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007906857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91774917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024719646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004593902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9118701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265365158","doi":"","title":"La Nature Juridique des Sûretés Réelles en Droit Civil et en Common Law: Une Question de Tradition Juridique? (Real Security within Civil Law and the Common Law: A Matter of Legal Traditions?)","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Political science; Common law; Comparative law; Private law; Unjust enrichment; Delict; Tort; Municipal law; Public law; Black letter law; Restitution; Liability","score_opus":0.005121735499528955,"score_gpt":0.2747953627260005,"score_spread":0.2696736272264716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265365158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86407244,0.0023317696,0.0005918482,0.051978406,0.00029495757,0.00046938454,0.00013841545,0.00004952396,0.080073275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897587,0.0074785165,0.0001880971,0.0013193685,0.000752105,0.00004940277,0.000037945214,0.00004314716,0.00037274658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944022,0.0029307648,0.0006341944,0.000325722,0.0004609128,0.0012461945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801034,0.0008864065,0.0004664331,0.00028974458,0.00012894144,0.00021811313],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008731328,0.00032419193,0.00045552282,0.000060703456,0.0014510164,0.00031920307,0.00055485836,0.0007367673,0.00006071203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029454393,0.0002769942,0.00025848573,0.00030618583,0.0030699954,0.0009477575,0.00005067248,0.008065326,0.000008315347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010871153,0.00030415435,0.00026810574,0.000049817147,0.00012617288,0.0000056681506,0.014187341,0.000033456694,0.00057276123,0.983837,0.00017423024,0.00033258068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010619091,0.00017707687,0.0017768035,0.00015952709,0.00021181545,0.0009829493,0.003740622,0.00018122523,0.0005329694,0.96984947,0.021030493,0.00029517026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08447517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8591873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77471215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008702452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002905967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266123483","doi":"","title":"Table of Contents: The Nature of Inquisitorial Processes in Administrative Regimes: Global Perspectives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Terminology; Adversarial system; Scope (computer science); Political science; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.01563111275027229,"score_gpt":0.3273762575354393,"score_spread":0.311745144785167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266123483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94773656,0.00985778,0.00027972687,0.01050512,0.0003269189,0.0006302619,0.000016182948,0.000013471172,0.030633966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972824,0.0016360157,0.000024501527,0.000017459639,0.0004607397,0.00001402958,4.6979693e-7,0.0000030604915,0.00056135614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987024,0.00010353469,0.00020940488,0.000099395955,0.00027502648,0.0006102303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999068,0.000099061035,0.00023221927,0.000085553576,0.0004791926,0.00003596627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006745361,0.000064472355,0.00012738722,0.000020992135,0.00020338806,0.000042356805,0.00037364764,0.00008783534,0.00003386928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004762246,0.000042802814,0.00004398815,0.0004778523,0.00028929234,0.00026252976,0.000021609367,0.00077599136,0.0000024957715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026496571,0.00010129042,0.0031649943,0.0000049519913,0.00004116722,1.3768907e-7,0.008310717,0.0000036710487,0.00009976717,0.98769313,0.00020642937,0.0003472446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068108516,0.00029260496,0.0047063637,0.00005711303,0.000024134137,0.000011799831,0.500564,0.000004717347,0.00036517886,0.48055443,0.012610654,0.00012794738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037015802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012783543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5071387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036777667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041720537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74010444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266637586","doi":"","title":"Substantive legitimate expectations: The Singapore reception","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore Academy of Law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Project commissioning; Relation (database); Publishing; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Judicial review; Sociology","score_opus":0.05252654725299365,"score_gpt":0.36045225419247956,"score_spread":0.3079257069394859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266637586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29907984,0.00095689605,0.006907646,0.10835278,0.0005617244,0.00077710307,0.000026895088,0.00016871933,0.5831684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970457,0.00015916901,0.0011753542,0.0005310473,0.00081863365,0.000008076589,0.0000025410845,0.000011852761,0.00024760963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840355,0.00031110455,0.00038541772,0.00013963527,0.00047871514,0.00028159286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989786,0.00025581627,0.00043703872,0.00008796107,0.00012519215,0.000115392606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015900802,0.00009733082,0.0001465375,0.00004586941,0.002574375,0.00015761453,0.00040518388,0.00011760179,0.00013434762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017206678,0.00007066743,0.00011636036,0.00022387298,0.00073060277,0.00044060417,0.000031028976,0.00053387275,0.00003168999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007964615,0.000026640857,0.00013163016,0.0000032525877,0.000015287858,2.87902e-7,0.010384042,0.000032456912,0.0007390727,0.9798673,0.0012057899,0.0075863176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029435448,0.000036021145,0.0013342407,0.00008330531,0.00004516508,0.000024406661,0.0146157425,0.00014220073,0.001781407,0.14624873,0.8352181,0.00017633136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025954898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023690195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8340123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007481939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061312065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267158788","doi":"","title":"The [Fiduciary] Duty of Fidelity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Fidelity; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Restitution; Discretion; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.019014594328360907,"score_gpt":0.2989873036870136,"score_spread":0.2799727093586527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267158788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89668876,0.0052992553,0.0035684716,0.023267798,0.00026831377,0.00026215758,0.000007780733,0.00004579884,0.07059166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817037,0.013830297,0.000030437712,0.0000487646,0.0002839755,0.0000029017774,3.507745e-7,0.000003829697,0.004095748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984288,0.00010252189,0.00018607515,0.00006987894,0.00026662968,0.0009460635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994921,0.00009592018,0.00012323307,0.00012474178,0.00010874119,0.000055282813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022020056,0.00004368384,0.00006777311,0.000014115353,0.0018462454,0.000021514701,0.0003470414,0.000033698896,0.000022598817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014339371,0.000029573703,0.000081217324,0.00015886295,0.00025676182,0.000094602605,0.000022275553,0.000653326,0.000018354769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005493147,0.000022270004,0.0014701126,3.2151056e-7,0.000018734214,2.9686927e-7,0.0009238046,0.000005097952,0.00008738812,0.988445,0.0003620753,0.008659417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000174133,0.000049377748,0.007249319,0.000003089758,0.0000109176135,0.000051953968,0.0059148693,0.000012993719,0.00006140427,0.5668912,0.41949642,0.00008433789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001380064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010200972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4215538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003025998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030476833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267271697","doi":"","title":"Business trust in Singapore.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.025722524703996604,"score_gpt":0.24267488172529844,"score_spread":0.21695235702130183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267271697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000854544,0.000142951,0.000349048,0.003079829,0.00009334074,0.0003650444,0.000028762945,0.0012547859,0.9938317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029415445,0.0026957397,0.0008434357,0.00006971841,0.00014184476,0.000003907997,0.000024338577,0.00008392764,0.96672165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987175,0.00006807423,0.00012563779,0.0004454222,0.0002399316,0.00040344568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993261,0.000041641775,0.00013751467,0.00036279776,0.000043659835,0.00008826785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011893767,0.00019959634,0.00029531366,0.0006821918,0.00032082968,0.000028155324,0.0009660033,0.0010153312,0.00095145847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001366602,0.0001988136,0.00008547523,0.0024004714,0.0011013048,0.00007136953,0.00026123255,0.00046259575,0.00024410494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069972407,0.00021062998,0.0012172984,0.0000145922595,0.00001798795,0.00040883827,0.00014036853,0.0000025910076,0.000018876632,0.8558543,0.13600759,0.0060999445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019522055,0.000008438472,0.00056094176,0.0000630798,0.000011271815,0.0000014246784,0.00063546625,0.0000031297468,0.000004589219,0.0010002862,0.99725163,0.000264503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039568376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047811745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8612441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028419524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016708858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267455731","doi":"","title":"Care For Life: Private Care Agreements Between Older Adults and Friends or Family Members","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Phenomenon; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Interpersonal relationship; Unintended consequences; Nursing; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.010444063660800938,"score_gpt":0.2907399214588565,"score_spread":0.2802958577980556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267455731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98651767,0.004338938,0.0016827252,0.001181816,0.00009607843,0.0005874579,0.000048665024,0.000041100004,0.0055055274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965991,0.000857657,0.00023213426,0.000066772154,0.00084977964,0.00003254191,0.000026110061,0.000016642003,0.0013192635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789166,0.000045501027,0.00022778478,0.00020802143,0.00028151198,0.0013455459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993951,0.0000497344,0.00013057323,0.00010276117,0.00018323578,0.00013862763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038841297,0.000118259755,0.00014778801,0.000049239898,0.0011418168,0.00011689515,0.00025148634,0.00008941464,0.000018077892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033118624,0.00009748424,0.000076532815,0.0001370012,0.00008131734,0.00017321386,0.00003575384,0.00045186473,0.0000044501453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022349217,0.000113495415,0.13102858,0.0001398897,0.00036786665,0.0000033185952,0.059324134,0.00004548368,0.000092577044,0.6537372,0.0012629863,0.15366098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052438052,0.0006053857,0.07649001,0.00013799603,0.00033114076,0.000008210888,0.32472336,0.00002379835,0.00010263844,0.04794375,0.54357135,0.0008185735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027580361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02269808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6057935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069077825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016865416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267556988","doi":"","title":"RESHAPING THE DUTIES OF DIRECTORS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of care; Business judgment rule; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Insolvency; Law; Business; Corporation; Creditor; Supreme court; Corporate law; Scope (computer science); Political science; Accounting; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.017349823338290084,"score_gpt":0.30437694734372606,"score_spread":0.28702712400543595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267556988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7297416,0.012255993,0.0016214562,0.07991837,0.00019894568,0.00026354875,0.0000029488508,0.000063869746,0.17593332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927615,0.0026083104,0.000040655683,0.00011620994,0.0005409372,0.000002516576,1.5639965e-7,0.0000041651915,0.003925561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987748,0.00007931268,0.00013522898,0.000053147425,0.00020357544,0.0007539126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968064,0.00006129552,0.00009466912,0.0000791007,0.00005202343,0.00003225896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017865957,0.000039044982,0.000057201905,0.00002306179,0.0006881965,0.00003566543,0.00028057292,0.000025639523,0.0000708892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066741355,0.000026038793,0.00006129483,0.00014401237,0.0001683757,0.000114004746,0.00001913374,0.00053376006,0.000015854022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002401237,0.000011528376,0.00037912335,3.7446227e-7,0.00001638042,3.099868e-8,0.0021428186,0.000025384448,0.000090155074,0.9757511,0.00020065093,0.021380043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011874131,0.000028909739,0.0006590733,0.000007994374,0.000016387034,0.000009302283,0.014458088,0.000029547551,0.00026425198,0.20098735,0.78334504,0.00007527567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090790394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016351156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7831444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032128027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011583763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91243285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268124680","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.004","title":"The civil law trust: a modality of ownership or an interlude in ownership?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Business; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Commercial law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06128180043822352,"score_gpt":0.26842321185353396,"score_spread":0.20714141141531045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268124680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091066817,0.000033362732,0.00004589619,0.00040047115,0.000090346395,0.00066563144,0.0001427587,0.000060852155,0.99765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09530051,0.00009912477,0.000052757503,0.00007449427,0.000117911404,0.000004240855,0.000013696749,0.000020997912,0.90431625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984467,0.00018432071,0.00026859352,0.00039206524,0.00035577494,0.0003525602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984256,0.00023435139,0.00030212654,0.0006490324,0.00017944863,0.00020942143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005050587,0.00022990323,0.00032008806,0.00007365401,0.0005798073,0.000103788494,0.0011669543,0.00035797493,0.000046087476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032466567,0.00017545874,0.0001634816,0.000023623865,0.0013219329,0.0001939326,0.00027657909,0.0004933172,0.000013944602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007897556,0.000018890465,0.000005741391,0.000026259062,0.00003330742,0.0000123172995,0.0013812713,0.0000014963157,0.000006424084,0.99510473,0.0015489619,0.0017815987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027006413,0.00003702315,0.000041857304,0.000079423626,0.000053728152,6.3461033e-7,0.0016131164,0.000058870923,0.000023556655,0.0007784176,0.9967948,0.00024845896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024812523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01831204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030029714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030874574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268216550","doi":"","title":"Advice to Vice-Regal Officers by Crown Law Officers and Others","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Legal advice; Vice president; Officer; Politics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.013530389191897916,"score_gpt":0.29132569120510227,"score_spread":0.27779530201320435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268216550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5559582,0.0037923544,0.0029162182,0.04972133,0.00042511892,0.00072848436,0.000024844177,0.00024308045,0.38619035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891655,0.00039181754,0.00014782415,0.001038802,0.00033732524,0.00000863891,0.0000018986946,0.00001886211,0.008889331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976616,0.000099458615,0.00018939642,0.00020365466,0.00038183283,0.001464071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916196,0.000041776995,0.00009821823,0.000121588506,0.00012187465,0.0004545999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017205769,0.00011412065,0.00012457413,0.00004435065,0.0006669499,0.00019397287,0.00032891668,0.00007848736,0.00003343261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052154275,0.00010662571,0.000050135746,0.0002657098,0.00016479718,0.00028559833,0.000039172173,0.00071104936,0.00009247627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064189546,0.000047861326,0.00017558473,0.0000015972363,0.000056195713,7.949317e-7,0.005642842,0.00006582978,0.0001974803,0.9765608,0.010126689,0.007060135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004815842,0.00014351953,0.00002810671,0.0000064323117,0.00002300061,0.00003074665,0.023729948,0.000015944157,0.00003044414,0.01344049,0.96188617,0.00018363926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012215383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05199289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96312034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010527378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003360042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99436235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268306630","doi":"","title":"The So-Called Purposive Construction of Patent Claims: Comments on Whirlpool and Free World Trust","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Object (grammar); Law; Original meaning; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.016743512287951005,"score_gpt":0.27350084137592856,"score_spread":0.25675732908797755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268306630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87867296,0.0023721603,0.00072567945,0.088105485,0.00021973357,0.00090626907,0.000009179637,0.000037581143,0.028950948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916474,0.0058937524,0.00008272798,0.00019316815,0.00031990436,0.000017970095,7.233831e-7,0.0000062098056,0.001838119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856466,0.00010716448,0.00022071727,0.00009921889,0.00026531596,0.000742917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944013,0.000095456075,0.00018305762,0.00013114003,0.00007698158,0.00007321023],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010133177,0.00007200251,0.000095392235,0.00004171179,0.0013124214,0.00010443494,0.00027977146,0.000038172773,0.000025938998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042954554,0.00005046109,0.00005556268,0.00014099613,0.0002953737,0.00011112653,0.000035626774,0.0006807007,0.0000081109265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032942287,0.000040729425,0.0012618223,7.1200583e-7,0.00004812094,1.0337792e-7,0.0005978113,0.000011623805,0.00004202062,0.9152684,0.00037926383,0.08231644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001396992,0.00021654509,0.002025972,0.000027042279,0.000052150892,0.000026079235,0.012659272,0.00012597568,0.00023673996,0.45606738,0.52699834,0.00016747919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028591623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021193564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5266191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048304064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006824674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268360709","doi":"","title":"Suppliers’ Duties to Report Product-Related Accidents under the New 'Australian Consumer Law': A Comparative Critique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Business; Product (mathematics); Confidentiality; European union; Consumer protection; Law; Political science; International trade; Commerce","score_opus":0.024489280811397063,"score_gpt":0.361172408279085,"score_spread":0.3366831274676879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268360709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6953219,0.0003316562,0.0011067492,0.26190954,0.0010002847,0.0010463137,0.000007566915,0.00010481728,0.039171156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600327,0.00012974383,0.000096617805,0.0004489103,0.00050490757,0.000018407267,0.000004856776,0.000011338556,0.038752545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975921,0.00010988605,0.0003182782,0.00023399515,0.00036427364,0.0013814607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991085,0.0000533559,0.00015736159,0.00027269303,0.00017203417,0.00023605135],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018398025,0.00012810217,0.00015241197,0.000039284718,0.0013457007,0.00026435623,0.0005354517,0.000086338536,0.00028594487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008143603,0.00009446262,0.000087515386,0.00028928646,0.0003540846,0.0003033933,0.00004768375,0.00216648,0.00015176184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007977872,0.000029376957,0.0002665853,4.1527954e-7,0.00007314309,0.0000028565742,0.0048505063,0.000014962555,0.00072654843,0.986576,0.0070608314,0.000390767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019662695,0.00003177748,0.00089216116,0.000005607243,0.00003548979,0.00031060167,0.01981456,8.8073057e-7,0.0006257935,0.43064493,0.547281,0.00016051941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011016736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21528624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5559311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000314037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040852646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268451974","doi":"","title":"A Charter Free Domain: In Defense of Dolphin Delivery","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Constitution; Common law; Legitimacy; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.007708372918076731,"score_gpt":0.24931509330282994,"score_spread":0.24160672038475323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268451974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95796776,0.0009591588,0.00089720724,0.0035878147,0.00004783519,0.00011587382,0.000003877804,0.000013757699,0.036406748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977824,0.0007035381,0.00013062717,0.000048642574,0.00030213007,0.0000050060494,9.686369e-7,0.000006279128,0.001020382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834037,0.00008159136,0.00023109115,0.00009593062,0.00022919229,0.0010218394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996383,0.000036565925,0.00010880174,0.0001232221,0.000053483738,0.0000395863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013767267,0.000060453247,0.00010315743,0.00007586257,0.00020842187,0.000028494876,0.0003054168,0.00005494882,0.0000404947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022980823,0.000055515946,0.00007414597,0.0002295191,0.000091679736,0.00013538347,0.000026688856,0.0005773456,0.000014832119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010613225,0.000062684,0.0055921245,0.000001141941,0.00000816557,0.0000014318271,0.0008054003,0.000015418163,0.0002813252,0.9919541,0.00016554474,0.0011020338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000517066,0.00004080186,0.0039292136,0.000009782825,0.000006724112,0.000009587807,0.0037688091,0.000007118601,0.000035468016,0.9642778,0.027308041,0.00008958892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006731097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09282186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08609076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004571299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011921768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268481372","doi":"10.21991/c9238n","title":"The Bilateral Amending Formula as a Mechanism for the Entrenchment of Property Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitution; Legislature; Property rights; Law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021187758004127085,"score_gpt":0.28794909136173163,"score_spread":0.26676133335760455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268481372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010699546,0.0009825996,0.2583028,0.21135783,0.0037624463,0.012527165,0.00052092894,0.00035164825,0.50149506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936732,0.00010021051,0.000718921,0.0006428426,0.00017703942,0.0012595608,0.000024399395,0.000004020691,0.0033997917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979381,0.00005695265,0.0005066815,0.00029996716,0.0005089619,0.00068934885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805754,0.00061400974,0.00023256734,0.00034403353,0.0005889463,0.0001628776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000517032,0.00019884962,0.00018849249,0.000060428636,0.0074700727,0.00027218,0.00063384144,0.000115109055,0.0002483546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003168066,0.0000975361,0.00024434077,0.0002524581,0.0051104873,0.0005327778,0.00014043528,0.0001609249,0.00016627873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016073269,0.00005642313,0.00023159788,0.000005626443,0.00006890071,4.1333868e-7,0.0002398747,0.000080856196,0.00030338464,0.99291396,0.004751583,0.001331321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004497082,0.000034861303,0.000041274365,0.00003758899,0.000040711748,0.000011658464,0.0029199375,0.0011140247,0.0007711404,0.35615286,0.63826174,0.00016451787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042643463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016689277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021732677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011402767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99759704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268611194","doi":"","title":"Deterrence, Prophylaxis and Punishment in Fiduciary Obligations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Prudence; Law and economics; Profit (economics); Wrongdoing; Function (biology); Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01134652939564317,"score_gpt":0.2805975674775995,"score_spread":0.26925103808195633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268611194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81353486,0.000024209387,0.00009831232,0.0081126625,0.000024133116,0.00037077663,7.347357e-7,0.000030345858,0.17780398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952659,0.0000293697,0.000961298,0.0001666165,0.000030170471,0.00012522272,9.2279214e-7,0.0000015809186,0.0034188891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996043,0.000023919663,0.000079629826,0.000094737254,0.00008458558,0.00011285089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998008,0.000032346416,0.000014102961,0.00006968864,0.000024988107,0.000058060694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011624445,0.000029695337,0.00003608254,0.000030368052,0.00017589927,0.00008222319,0.0000752596,0.000028080975,0.0004162112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025922584,0.00002508204,0.000008796528,0.00017927076,0.000086196706,0.00018918772,0.000029332758,0.000047362446,0.00010984017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.265099e-7,0.000107765605,0.11126119,0.0000045968086,0.0000033593287,4.978127e-7,0.008728579,0.0000045618713,0.0004797479,0.8003289,0.003806961,0.07527329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023796281,0.000048651073,0.6907346,0.00001553324,0.000003421916,4.7377435e-7,0.00908138,0.00048288237,0.00025672617,0.09994598,0.19893402,0.00025834466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016012356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010517831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70038295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023958492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044721233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268936173","doi":"","title":"Demystifying Juristic Reasons","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Mistake; Obligation; Plaintiff; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Law and economics; Restitution; Sociology","score_opus":0.08187277001745748,"score_gpt":0.3476645180210045,"score_spread":0.26579174800354705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268936173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06452503,0.000029672336,0.0036722545,0.0067206593,0.000045490662,0.00008224605,0.0000015394038,0.00013572632,0.9247874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97410864,0.000056646422,0.001752876,0.00018684361,0.00013072511,0.000009384695,7.011821e-7,0.000002514038,0.02375169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999626,0.000018225339,0.000052254338,0.00007410542,0.00010737907,0.000122036545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976206,0.000053348613,0.000013373238,0.0000769804,0.000023071145,0.00007117965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010064913,0.000025109694,0.000034147895,0.000010628824,0.0007899953,0.000014457707,0.000097472235,0.000023344435,0.00042364112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008123485,0.000022439744,0.000020725645,0.00012139405,0.00010826213,0.00005462988,0.000015556347,0.000038903894,0.00039475202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.9715306e-7,0.000015773827,0.0035901878,6.7236914e-7,0.0000017751197,0.0000020072293,0.0019217022,0.0000025238091,0.000035503,0.9847858,0.00867638,0.00096727186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038831906,0.0000023506102,0.010936785,0.0000016290574,0.0000027848814,0.0000017953193,0.0005030967,0.00003318998,0.000024511346,0.0034346008,0.9849615,0.000058933794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025400352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007872069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9813512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023796585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000895453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269380789","doi":"","title":"Should the Notion of a Right of Ownership Bearing on Incorporeal Property Meet with Disapproval? Reflections Upon the Ownership of Claims (Faut-il Condamner La Propriété Des Biens Incorporels? Réflexions Autour de La Propriété Des Créances)","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04623034687795371,"score_gpt":0.3213980498036467,"score_spread":0.27516770292569304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269380789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.894255,0.0017675953,0.008771302,0.041341532,0.00016990777,0.001803571,0.000054891385,0.00008146708,0.051754743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917779,0.001883026,0.0015082026,0.00009596353,0.00051562546,0.00010453881,0.000004267874,0.00005141125,0.004059092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438363,0.0016864949,0.0008816334,0.00038899746,0.0009298002,0.0017294575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969315,0.00061785517,0.0012910746,0.00047025652,0.0005037353,0.00018556237],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007747953,0.00036736747,0.0004677667,0.00016544604,0.0018170036,0.00013367581,0.00096673873,0.0003417549,0.000043786673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026724447,0.00016666739,0.0003194181,0.0014117608,0.004807078,0.0005327375,0.00010525725,0.0027796384,0.0000050013623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038231726,0.0009165623,0.0027731892,0.00009555699,0.0003597526,0.0000018721654,0.011723555,0.003931997,0.0030980827,0.93712693,0.000047991136,0.039542165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018340659,0.0026152064,0.0073608165,0.0009605682,0.0008529312,0.0005470198,0.019901983,0.0024989238,0.009908351,0.930166,0.022724856,0.00062927726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004912051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05422568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097522885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015172542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006389605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269438008","doi":"","title":"The 'Fraud-on-the-Market' Theory for Securities Litigation Arrives in Canada: Two Steps Forward and One Back?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Misrepresentation; Securities fraud; Plaintiff; Business; Class action; Supreme court; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Economics; Actuarial science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015734056614615893,"score_gpt":0.2524480129128991,"score_spread":0.2367139562982832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269438008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9111009,0.005470026,0.0022343914,0.05219163,0.0001723371,0.00090664375,0.00002075893,0.000015391939,0.027887901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777825,0.0081528835,0.000027910093,0.0002463605,0.00026016153,0.00004066457,7.919311e-7,0.0000075007088,0.0034854726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983466,0.0002112917,0.00017629103,0.000101871745,0.00023155699,0.0009323793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881124,0.0008806962,0.00009577537,0.000090930065,0.00006124928,0.00006011428],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024154393,0.00007132692,0.00008476384,0.00002186341,0.0018316692,0.00006818886,0.00023628434,0.000025597075,0.000025038229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018834525,0.00004690472,0.00004040056,0.000106576816,0.00022760416,0.00010821774,0.00001698662,0.0005596613,0.0000019211427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025546831,0.000008737177,0.0005141088,0.000001336351,0.000022636958,2.0780877e-7,0.001752458,0.000007922073,0.0000075716644,0.9922271,0.0005361184,0.004896268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034267423,0.000050714654,0.0019227715,0.000017682498,0.000008937018,0.000012752345,0.026672717,0.00008223118,0.00004527322,0.89976704,0.07098003,0.00009718728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14018655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9607085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82052195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009947446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069874823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269531635","doi":"","title":"Sovereignty's Promise -- 'Introduction: The State as Fiduciary and the Rule of Law'","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Statute; Law; Obligation; Political science; Sovereignty; Private law; State (computer science); Public law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.014304158657667824,"score_gpt":0.25985795527504224,"score_spread":0.24555379661737442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269531635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53877765,0.006133168,0.00053493195,0.08819105,0.00037099453,0.0010078187,0.0000069479656,0.00004846592,0.36492896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99176395,0.0031165546,0.000027613716,0.00017409111,0.0005615764,0.000010992147,2.7803054e-7,0.000005662168,0.0043392833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876,0.00016796106,0.0001579878,0.00009628919,0.00019961475,0.0006181605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954057,0.00005673176,0.00013912866,0.00014774021,0.00007466484,0.00004115885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002656744,0.00005757633,0.00008538752,0.000012412873,0.00092692696,0.000047852853,0.00029407558,0.000025415364,0.00016084897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056774446,0.000030478064,0.00005891595,0.000096033604,0.0006108902,0.00014212396,0.000036571717,0.00061602355,0.000014721472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004816982,0.000019878185,0.000027009637,8.137774e-7,0.00003583032,1.3569934e-7,0.008752763,0.0000015922883,0.00001641946,0.98821884,0.00007564487,0.0028029252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034801583,0.000037792837,0.00014967835,0.000002097661,0.000024941251,0.000034721703,0.005944088,0.000005508515,0.00012482841,0.9376275,0.05565587,0.000044948818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004369073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025146075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45298627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010211538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000931446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7129266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269778463","doi":"","title":"R. v. Ha: Upholding General Warrants Without Asking the Right Questions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Parliament; Statute; Law; Political science; Warrant; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.012866973350300234,"score_gpt":0.3121257233692345,"score_spread":0.29925875001893426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269778463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7897533,0.003756933,0.02734945,0.08652912,0.00052456494,0.0004995795,0.000004070941,0.00019405116,0.091388896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908079,0.0018934627,0.00016226564,0.00044419855,0.0011624539,0.0000051351212,8.306052e-7,0.00000767535,0.005516117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773705,0.00014544102,0.00019017611,0.000117457465,0.00031354063,0.0014963532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995347,0.00003672564,0.00011554808,0.00014417311,0.000074036594,0.000094777635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020401268,0.00009201995,0.00009825221,0.000041489446,0.0027517322,0.00021224249,0.00044207697,0.0000484699,0.000051367726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007030655,0.000062677675,0.00009495623,0.00025238385,0.00009783135,0.00024451315,0.000016280563,0.001204492,0.000035349964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029739417,0.000024539895,0.00049028185,1.8607854e-7,0.000017712819,7.698771e-7,0.0011884796,0.000057377463,0.00031326385,0.98599166,0.00020007377,0.011712713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002990477,0.00006815392,0.0034904983,0.00001924142,0.000044548568,0.00013173601,0.003661928,0.00022787321,0.00007943385,0.75524163,0.23652668,0.00020923991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072892115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00616876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2363266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006539152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001565712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269976336","doi":"","title":"The development of Charter damages jurisprudence in Canada : guidelines from the Supreme Court","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Punitive damages; Jurisprudence; Political science; Charter; Commonwealth","score_opus":0.07312488672695615,"score_gpt":0.3517869886197988,"score_spread":0.27866210189284263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269976336","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0715036,0.59053916,0.00031666094,0.13292913,0.002330024,0.0063284165,0.00023582357,0.00014306887,0.19567409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8337393,0.15335707,0.0028183097,0.00504786,0.0009798394,0.00044565782,0.00004058029,0.00006694944,0.00350442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949765,0.00073678774,0.0015602671,0.0004314249,0.0012933821,0.0010016228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597913,0.0016786872,0.0005174441,0.0011241098,0.00040759708,0.00029301547],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043212865,0.00035131586,0.0006151742,0.000025005951,0.0015432212,0.000088713176,0.0017662641,0.0001083918,0.00035073573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005696537,0.0002128587,0.0001675129,0.00061758375,0.00047792614,0.00037358722,0.00032364405,0.00045326079,0.00010500919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054233707,0.00038844318,0.037544023,0.00091524655,0.00033003712,0.000005919565,0.019590758,0.000015518912,0.000226931,0.5492859,0.22352083,0.16812217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001611835,0.00000693881,0.0036904009,0.0010119227,0.000048164493,7.9552547e-7,0.0028477118,0.00001309474,0.00024690945,0.0001627742,0.9915269,0.0002831791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6207019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92635167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7680061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004095261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002615353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270277363","doi":"","title":"The Valuation of Chances","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Tort; Causation; Valuation (finance); Commonwealth; Actuarial science; Certainty; Economics; Law and economics; English law; Law; Political science; Liability; Accounting; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03821480883393581,"score_gpt":0.31714432908490414,"score_spread":0.27892952025096834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270277363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9062148,0.0071287323,0.010028241,0.020624105,0.0002823809,0.0002653277,0.0000012088195,0.00003149499,0.055423763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97467816,0.021493029,0.0000219902,0.000019376677,0.00026184335,0.0000038263897,1.9641503e-7,0.0000023594225,0.0035192105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998922,0.000074255404,0.00011399362,0.000042883297,0.00024714362,0.0005997166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996582,0.00006331919,0.00010467923,0.000059777387,0.00008843151,0.00002557223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018277683,0.000027600017,0.000040303974,0.0000137320185,0.0014413885,0.000016274595,0.00020335043,0.000019950667,0.0000090194235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007971262,0.000018275483,0.000041330397,0.00013063614,0.00016021129,0.00008811216,0.0000086149785,0.0003141588,0.000011262213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027412173,0.000009360174,0.0004884812,1.7000568e-7,0.0000130765875,5.322647e-8,0.0013075451,0.0000070705055,0.00007038497,0.984691,0.00005784183,0.013352257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014915207,0.00006217316,0.0021826783,0.0000031622637,0.00001128775,0.000022890705,0.00857844,0.000040589148,0.00015045174,0.81886667,0.16987512,0.00005741192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044698262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005121473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16981727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018417915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001966384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270302900","doi":"10.21991/c9dm2n","title":"R. V. HEYWOOD: OVERBREADTH IN THE LAW OR IN THE JUDGMENT?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09085970743381327,"score_gpt":0.3195633263976049,"score_spread":0.2287036189637916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270302900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010357988,0.00032557355,0.005154677,0.03338862,0.0006380204,0.0016435444,0.00015228053,0.00008884929,0.9482505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117744,0.00008323736,0.00037158612,0.007553157,0.00013562836,0.0003620032,0.000030304607,0.000004844481,0.0002817869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748725,0.00027605848,0.00052372547,0.0003603316,0.00063202786,0.0007206024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988804,0.00037123848,0.00012610026,0.00043609,0.000092068796,0.00009413778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015473104,0.00020954425,0.00019506236,0.00011667132,0.0020919563,0.00016133614,0.0010653492,0.00015464485,0.00038161012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002589303,0.00012691574,0.00013052272,0.00085154054,0.0064317025,0.000641988,0.00010293756,0.00041804588,0.00021576267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036213944,0.00027818556,0.008755726,0.0000043182686,0.0000101803,0.000034988298,0.0041107023,0.000037936254,0.0000056544472,0.9841219,0.0023859586,0.00021823135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095390243,0.000043815955,0.0044988287,0.00007187383,0.000024963992,0.000075532414,0.040057994,0.000053817363,0.000023850183,0.11183933,0.842039,0.00031710052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009069208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05995147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98081946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021025626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013376338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270901736","doi":"","title":"Canada's Unique Approach to Public/Private Divide and the Perils of Reform Via a Court Challenge","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Equity (law); Payment; Government (linguistics); Health care; Typology; Public economics; Business; Public administration; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.011715355506210955,"score_gpt":0.24488666227283662,"score_spread":0.23317130676662567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270901736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17157674,0.0017448249,0.101277605,0.4010308,0.00015118968,0.0010751826,0.000011337375,0.00004728228,0.323085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972588,0.0014527454,0.000094866205,0.0003418021,0.00022670142,0.000018629738,7.3533334e-7,0.0000077095665,0.00059802027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982112,0.00016932082,0.00018964858,0.00011876074,0.00032908464,0.0009819709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994129,0.00006161923,0.0001219184,0.0001561647,0.00009771151,0.0001496664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036893776,0.00007608183,0.00014446692,0.000031896798,0.0006482022,0.00006685664,0.00041944985,0.000041679166,0.0000056463637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011300067,0.000048923077,0.000042130487,0.00017197242,0.00016855408,0.00009752681,0.00006343602,0.00059880764,0.0000010183892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092872915,0.000017610018,0.00008493192,0.0000020304483,0.000024264189,3.94403e-8,0.0009640497,0.00000363118,0.000014233771,0.9888237,0.00006704426,0.0099891955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060604926,0.00008059234,0.00091770256,0.000007723661,0.000021160322,0.000024091456,0.0051867976,0.0002643926,0.000018510129,0.381759,0.6109607,0.00015327884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44186842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88774467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82568204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008716113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032170399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.570689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271034153","doi":"","title":"Canadian Contract Law, 1970-2010","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy of law; Private law; Common law; Political science; Commercial law; Comparative law; Public law; Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06243914955490726,"score_gpt":0.3439151957841798,"score_spread":0.2814760462292725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271034153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048422854,0.000028882901,0.00002480016,0.0075054606,0.00011497372,0.00010857281,0.000003910981,0.000045123976,0.94374543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734198,0.0000101106825,0.0002748677,0.0007695151,0.00011406382,0.000009675228,0.0000011132123,0.0000043181353,0.025396565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995453,0.000021707518,0.000045781475,0.00008455746,0.000079442885,0.00022322446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956036,0.000017598677,0.000019260975,0.0001249635,0.00003056525,0.00024723337],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015543307,0.00003666889,0.000044557957,0.000015586656,0.00039615523,0.00003061401,0.0001580901,0.00004776549,0.0021443723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021156413,0.000035721307,0.00002263799,0.00008322177,0.00009398782,0.00006423644,0.000009235682,0.000068414425,0.0005851764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.565773e-7,0.000009559514,0.0008998063,4.447654e-7,0.0000027879767,0.0000020959476,0.02565256,1.1953816e-7,0.00004298021,0.9693419,0.0034746996,0.0005723415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004265957,0.000004489175,0.0057262057,0.0000014807604,0.0000037040554,2.3501204e-7,0.0023933742,0.000003898254,0.00012352863,0.0022662885,0.98937166,0.00006247464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98215556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9817909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98589694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008092782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025069137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271256261","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139031288.022","title":"Property","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04031531985228431,"score_gpt":0.23144337021976472,"score_spread":0.1911280503674804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271256261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015682544,0.000037103357,0.000074714626,0.00021983791,0.00010805812,0.0006110144,0.000082485276,0.00016438661,0.99868673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009494713,0.00014310886,0.00008419198,0.00008851486,0.00026927507,0.0000019515858,0.000015991172,0.000023587001,0.99842393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990335,0.00003181884,0.00010540948,0.00032129083,0.00026183022,0.0002461431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991053,0.000033255146,0.00012258324,0.0003598743,0.00017197491,0.00020703096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009190895,0.00017659787,0.00019104323,0.000055441044,0.00062409637,0.00008464678,0.00056194706,0.00029998834,0.000077713856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008541085,0.00015943176,0.00013827275,0.0000062629833,0.0004346238,0.00010350935,0.0002259731,0.00030840814,0.0003124544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035281255,0.0000040086984,4.687358e-7,0.000009862925,0.000023859326,0.000011526573,0.00014391348,1.6864475e-7,0.000004936276,0.8664949,0.13118735,0.0021154995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010610246,0.000008328778,0.000004674355,0.000033373002,0.000055734996,5.752697e-7,0.00008327594,0.0000063876087,0.000011979331,0.000041212712,0.99940395,0.00024439557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057351347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000570236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86821663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021798858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024443326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8669846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271712870","doi":"","title":"The danger lurking in apparently familiar words : common & civil law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Without Prejudice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Ancient history; History; Quarter (Canadian coin); Roman Empire; Mediterranean climate; Geography; Archaeology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021163380358148083,"score_gpt":0.32598759159244334,"score_spread":0.30482421123429526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271712870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104914784,0.00034198692,0.00022196298,0.012214441,0.00015246247,0.00047420725,0.000004078198,0.00013565287,0.8815404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664134,0.00020603601,0.00011237225,0.001167231,0.00019927493,0.000038790382,0.0000021346232,0.0000068049226,0.0016260102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988466,0.0001384982,0.00019007073,0.00019279687,0.00028956422,0.00034246413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993603,0.00016651391,0.000071829745,0.00028931318,0.000031480067,0.00008056451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070869585,0.00008625349,0.00011362501,0.000020391632,0.0009256373,0.00015841148,0.0004473992,0.000063969994,0.000014859867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005573298,0.00006740769,0.00004128056,0.0003337108,0.00021019878,0.00016572296,0.000049646344,0.0002041236,0.00004748468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015336313,0.00009212692,0.008961616,0.0000032556222,0.0000071889363,0.0000021646842,0.0139742745,0.0000330717,0.0001958403,0.9433068,0.0014178886,0.031990413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019407397,0.000016691281,0.022486238,0.000041633804,0.000009043758,4.3093794e-7,0.0022528209,0.00017033023,0.0000433688,0.018300127,0.95633906,0.00014616686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008911963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15763044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9549212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008352849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076929224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99768776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271856803","doi":"","title":"The Rights of Private Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Public law; Comparative law; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Commercial law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008237456803218449,"score_gpt":0.28773733625692227,"score_spread":0.2794998794537038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271856803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41832125,0.004063603,0.0032398934,0.07435766,0.00026698352,0.00041870106,0.0000029333723,0.00006891646,0.49926007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538416,0.0014811384,0.000033085485,0.0000920341,0.0002230997,9.679069e-7,1.6203586e-7,0.000001893532,0.0027834382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869883,0.0000589282,0.00013485577,0.000053146807,0.00019788712,0.0008563298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996745,0.000041944284,0.00009534741,0.00009417617,0.000050032362,0.000044018034],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013324984,0.000038271024,0.00005297209,0.000010357759,0.0013433315,0.00005331082,0.00032272624,0.000027546797,0.000009071157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000186286,0.000023558026,0.000055769284,0.0001129137,0.00013088908,0.00009208189,0.000008126066,0.00048322688,0.000012645631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034131049,0.000014430679,0.000016037875,9.2349566e-8,0.000008512258,9.609987e-8,0.00027300918,0.0000018850576,0.00009654347,0.99347997,0.000055037566,0.0060509476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053694584,0.000033064996,0.00012573913,0.0000014699556,0.000003772966,0.0000032101136,0.00031702814,0.0000020190537,0.00008087419,0.6468871,0.35246864,0.000023372817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000749375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014807225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57706296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019524562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005897877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272687555","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-18759-4_16","title":"Disgorgement of Profits in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Fiduciary; Discretion; Law; Principal (computer security); Common law; Unjust enrichment; Business; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Duty; Restitution; Economics","score_opus":0.09716062455108453,"score_gpt":0.3226159443959292,"score_spread":0.22545531984484468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272687555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087126123,0.0004806029,0.0000036500558,0.0007813099,0.0002603375,0.00034509142,0.00006559018,0.000009383982,0.9971828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49502409,0.00003797529,0.000038940147,0.00004165005,0.00009075899,0.00001638113,0.000021263737,0.0000100011885,0.50471896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990034,0.000014868562,0.00024637335,0.00015453024,0.00041285477,0.00016796481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943286,0.000024701463,0.000145494,0.00019405456,0.00010173633,0.000101180216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015929443,0.000101760124,0.00023775379,0.000035052115,0.000057864527,0.000011898286,0.00027816478,0.00006700491,0.0002379667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007877456,0.00010145257,0.000032117554,0.000042870775,0.00007757742,0.00002769727,0.00006056118,0.00016716418,0.00004362882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025386912,0.000009362211,0.0003351095,0.000009707893,0.000008373701,0.000003236035,0.00039409328,0.00003303015,0.0000012734286,0.9125659,0.08627331,0.0003641087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007433274,0.0000052437736,0.00042443888,0.000040872645,0.0000069235844,7.9656445e-8,0.00015735147,0.000020477484,0.0000036556066,0.010572178,0.98858005,0.00011440099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9057662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99388224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90230674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065208523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035862378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6361832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272968454","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review of the Executive - Principled Exasperation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of public and international law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Project commissioning; Statutory law; Law; Management; Publishing; Queen (butterfly); Judicial review; Political science; Operations research; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.030568537566160955,"score_gpt":0.3255545468062269,"score_spread":0.29498600924006596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272968454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15770973,0.001745583,0.0004147668,0.32607695,0.002791493,0.00041798234,0.000029200517,0.000013910587,0.51080036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867261,0.002639,0.00023256883,0.0013258551,0.0010337862,0.0000013611152,0.0000021771762,0.0000030599376,0.008036075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992206,0.00005411558,0.00027309725,0.000053484633,0.00032403535,0.00007468595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990673,0.000052875363,0.0003102682,0.000058960573,0.00041700326,0.00009356452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007586696,0.00004093722,0.00009719069,0.000026353337,0.00015444425,0.000061196646,0.000280878,0.00003819256,0.0003083026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031948023,0.00002587936,0.000068043824,0.00008778855,0.00016331063,0.00029955374,0.00003924663,0.00018358251,0.0000015105878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036272922,0.000032832395,0.0020071259,0.0000076450915,0.00001848578,1.7711615e-7,0.00037086842,1.9341466e-7,0.00039207452,0.98452836,0.009364641,0.0032739406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021857914,0.000019532199,0.005628991,0.00011983035,0.000012405836,0.0000103362345,0.000058429647,0.0000058391092,0.00009665701,0.010324888,0.9834723,0.00003225246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005190096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013880167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019826364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032420125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3375697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272988380","doi":"","title":"The Abrogation of the Rule Against Recovery in Mistake of Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Law; Restitution; Commonwealth; Statute; Political science; Repeal; Legislature; Commission; Common law","score_opus":0.010786189445508639,"score_gpt":0.2853970838873481,"score_spread":0.27461089444183945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272988380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9133519,0.00076855585,0.00041277666,0.0044997907,0.0001070828,0.00014265324,0.0000017696349,0.000004261152,0.08071122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976822,0.0012034529,0.000017618897,0.00005521776,0.000085431384,0.0000011094718,2.642671e-7,0.0000029600562,0.00095174665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988892,0.00006746401,0.00022440964,0.000046403653,0.00021414997,0.00055834284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951386,0.00011671296,0.00018911483,0.00009745331,0.00006280081,0.000020072197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034254778,0.000032794833,0.000053418957,0.000016678525,0.00042210697,0.00001815889,0.00028569956,0.000034323035,0.0000035784374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078101184,0.000019950608,0.00006458106,0.00019422891,0.00016838509,0.00007230018,0.000014657828,0.0004319924,0.0000014001597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010118549,0.00002032956,0.00067062106,8.3519626e-7,0.000008376747,4.8495355e-8,0.001053851,0.000032925167,0.0007581435,0.9843088,0.000008994232,0.013126987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004640149,0.000065596425,0.013494209,0.00003810433,0.000014930424,0.0000047198628,0.019055333,0.000021298918,0.0029541738,0.7403638,0.22341748,0.00010638075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016091063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08685089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24394502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035732074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093288656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9298117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273018940","doi":"","title":"The Economics of Fiduciary Accountability","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Opportunism; Proscription; Duty of loyalty; Accountability; Law and economics; Function (biology); Variety (cybernetics); Loyalty; Perspective (graphical); Duty; Economics; Liability; Business; Political science; Accounting; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012815026556827177,"score_gpt":0.3100432314357041,"score_spread":0.2972282048788769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273018940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9498047,0.0010435088,0.002190436,0.004575035,0.00016949946,0.00012007207,0.0000016833234,0.000012225703,0.042082787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390393,0.0047163954,0.000028825534,0.000041038882,0.00033424597,0.0000011169992,2.3780942e-7,0.0000036572812,0.0009705556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985907,0.000042270156,0.00020546628,0.00006632509,0.00010788731,0.0009873636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994491,0.00018496781,0.00012847506,0.000118957614,0.00007133345,0.000047175974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007198346,0.00003874791,0.000057330777,0.000015839121,0.000849429,0.000040777337,0.00032629978,0.00003787381,0.000014562212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008456978,0.000027991644,0.000065701905,0.0000953733,0.00017467659,0.00010965552,0.00002099005,0.0005438904,0.0000088368415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000864776,0.000015915542,0.0018093518,3.2050497e-7,0.000013438465,2.9770433e-8,0.00054919306,0.0000043786144,0.000022985927,0.9626817,0.000027493285,0.034866504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109879395,0.00003285254,0.0043334323,0.0000016254131,0.000008658688,0.0000066834978,0.01666967,0.000006775991,0.000088688364,0.72819984,0.25048068,0.00006118816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012264568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06786273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2504532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006285746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021002754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94914633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273439551","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Torts in the Nineties Edited by Nicholas J. Mullany","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisprudence; Law; Imprisonment; Political science; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.0073630420778782735,"score_gpt":0.3001173620472096,"score_spread":0.2927543199693313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273439551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065890606,0.82223713,0.0009782679,0.12970266,0.00025713257,0.00056297553,0.0000034481939,0.00004193799,0.0396274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3714071,0.5693543,0.00001981811,0.025452167,0.0016616,0.000021109649,0.000006700611,0.000016387046,0.032060836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773294,0.00014820215,0.0002556945,0.00011025622,0.00038888934,0.0013640374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995339,0.00010412537,0.00011317719,0.00013108164,0.000054720982,0.00006300352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060429266,0.00007753947,0.00010309555,0.000036625173,0.00047891628,0.00006626838,0.00043895448,0.000053922868,0.00013488892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011714931,0.000054160446,0.00006558724,0.0003051386,0.00008303145,0.00016791208,0.000017062575,0.0012064833,0.00003234931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008672305,0.00007915747,0.0005312977,0.000007883548,0.000019903051,0.0000031527782,0.001881161,0.000001037341,0.00006836119,0.22701152,0.76235825,0.008029599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112870366,0.000030944106,0.0002582757,0.000032952194,0.00000987534,0.00002036812,0.0020178114,8.290448e-7,0.0000074696954,0.0087175835,0.98871833,0.00007268257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080319203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009238008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36481804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046347224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007229103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52416366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227435901","doi":"","title":"CANADIAN CONTRACT AND TORT LAW: THE CONCEPT OF FORCE MAJEURE IN QUEBEC AND ITS COMMON LAW EQUIVALENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Tort; Civil law (Civil law); Doctrine; Law; Common law; Civil code; Political science; Frustration of purpose; Comparative law; Delict; Accident (philosophy); Exclusion clause; Private law; Public law; Philosophy; Liability; Black letter law; Business; Privity of contract; Contract management","score_opus":0.019285660534875043,"score_gpt":0.2765056945264532,"score_spread":0.2572200339915781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227435901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305799,0.0056853597,0.000028267676,0.0062033627,0.000048949394,0.0003112683,0.000010844538,0.000007026747,0.057125006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707115,0.00088992156,0.000003417483,0.00025625146,0.00005894736,0.0000037826535,5.157182e-7,0.0000044176877,0.0017115809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988689,0.00008242204,0.00014347707,0.00007755855,0.00010889392,0.00071875483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996704,0.000042099018,0.00007325809,0.000062152205,0.000036289064,0.0001157914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000860472,0.000055073466,0.0000949636,0.000018881772,0.00040210263,0.000038776907,0.00016779552,0.000048699556,0.000027815217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010673242,0.000040789208,0.000023043985,0.000059336762,0.00018037758,0.00015006954,0.000017842007,0.00048419987,0.000001047177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048095144,0.000009210287,0.0018583098,8.8768564e-7,0.000011003708,8.555035e-7,0.0044501694,0.0000010852657,0.00002600165,0.9925313,0.000008264359,0.0010980803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013440717,0.00029180487,0.02789878,0.00006032383,0.000075395925,0.00009093371,0.034079958,0.000085461266,0.00051906676,0.8441292,0.09104161,0.000383389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9422418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99905264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14840212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039239507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013166248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3092689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274568678","doi":"","title":"Oppression: Reducing Canadian Corporate Law to a Muddy Default","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Context (archaeology); Default; Law and economics; Corporation; Shareholder; Corporate law; Business; Default rule; Obligation; Law; Ex-ante; Economics; Corporate governance; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.05813269913851696,"score_gpt":0.3201240785337208,"score_spread":0.2619913793952039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274568678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36335346,0.0016467752,0.004259148,0.084102616,0.0009854683,0.00073145295,0.000017186847,0.0001366572,0.54476726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99119836,0.0001422088,0.0002510928,0.00072159007,0.00066218775,0.000010014842,0.000001838365,0.000011777597,0.0070009134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974952,0.000102212194,0.00016129842,0.00015078661,0.00029792634,0.0017926091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986409,0.000020871259,0.00010215477,0.00013815856,0.00017821886,0.0009196729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021453216,0.00007922037,0.00009413874,0.00006708651,0.001013176,0.00016568489,0.00037121418,0.00006583098,0.000041058265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014733481,0.00007218458,0.00004406268,0.00030556592,0.000066295004,0.00019776075,0.00002883167,0.0007631829,0.00019669322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064938495,0.000012200918,0.00015179846,3.542056e-7,0.000012920818,0.0000035966218,0.0027133697,0.00017444158,0.0000695999,0.98900026,0.0028527025,0.0050022546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021249411,0.000073306415,0.00005939091,0.000014793017,0.000011556354,0.00004771768,0.011094325,0.000041618514,0.00003579704,0.26639715,0.72185373,0.00015808786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46862116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90525347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7226031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002043109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01248411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275063425","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n1p35","title":"The Superficies Right in the Light of the Romanian Land Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Front (military); Law; Context (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Political science; Land law; Property rights; Land tenure; Law and economics; Geography; Economics; Meteorology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012909153728013475,"score_gpt":0.27636769413172746,"score_spread":0.26345854040371397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275063425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5564435,0.00038408846,0.000007898501,0.18318444,0.0001455758,0.0000996731,0.000012316355,0.0000018114906,0.25972068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841946,0.0001238923,0.0000064876604,0.0005115181,0.00019171482,6.955524e-7,1.8055212e-8,0.0000017046461,0.00074447994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999429,0.0000900217,0.00015801203,0.000027517168,0.00017740812,0.000118052514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995121,0.00021711472,0.00008804041,0.00009468196,0.000056186225,0.00003191091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005808193,0.000030507546,0.000058519043,0.000006537259,0.0005137279,0.000062837564,0.0002779551,0.000023064953,0.000009704477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032836,0.000009521993,0.000042377607,0.000050615046,0.00041789326,0.000060765797,0.000023284356,0.000073434414,7.9117586e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.605773e-7,0.000012732062,0.0010570147,9.901289e-7,0.0000036210852,4.9527483e-7,0.0021429167,1.843043e-7,0.00008073374,0.99638194,0.00027134814,0.000047179117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009801042,0.000015564365,0.0047283117,0.000018755341,0.000007883648,0.0000040040495,0.0012013664,8.947955e-7,0.00023049067,0.06983311,0.92384154,0.000020075895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019656867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012424325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92654884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015314963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004786633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6933065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275510070","doi":"","title":"Muscutt V. Courcelles Revisited: The Court of Appeal for Ontario Takes Another Look","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Political science; Nova scotia; Test (biology); Sociology","score_opus":0.015204145546308794,"score_gpt":0.28545294949615346,"score_spread":0.2702488039498447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275510070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49652234,0.012031815,0.0907881,0.16843404,0.00042151412,0.0034219958,0.000041744886,0.0001661361,0.22817232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98419726,0.0007522185,0.00016946367,0.0004156293,0.00045404935,0.0000068123104,0.000001799911,0.000008359488,0.013994384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835366,0.00006315795,0.00022576815,0.00011349359,0.0002604548,0.0009834813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994297,0.00007512462,0.00018886212,0.00014197806,0.00011775817,0.000046566427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018967529,0.00008313554,0.00013262244,0.000029861345,0.00074546906,0.00006463829,0.000402986,0.00005790952,0.00008329913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036790745,0.000056740922,0.00014455154,0.000119674114,0.00011979558,0.00009355935,0.000007230925,0.0005939525,0.000008357907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002861233,0.00007351222,0.0006767854,0.0000019361812,0.000050050712,1.3547087e-7,0.0048688697,0.000029991272,0.00022271866,0.97733116,0.0026685463,0.014047686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036418205,0.0002007198,0.0012761647,0.000016359232,0.00004846501,0.0000089950945,0.008119507,0.000023678454,0.000054626737,0.19116734,0.79860634,0.000113615795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005779741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12754397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79593784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005448842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024965934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88837606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275732292","doi":"","title":"Deconstructing Directness in Canada: A Critical Evaluation of the Role of Directness in the Tort of Battery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Tort reform; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.01342946052622324,"score_gpt":0.291847602946881,"score_spread":0.27841814242065777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275732292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928133,0.00058234925,0.0000207076,0.0017322982,0.000056433306,0.00021374178,0.0000015819626,9.940754e-7,0.0045786006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998219,0.0000728629,0.0000106826055,0.000017528075,0.000044166736,0.000020411846,1.5843261e-7,0.0000030663305,0.000009242177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980785,0.0004643932,0.00032886822,0.00007131146,0.0005486795,0.00050824776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919,0.0002964724,0.00016715337,0.000111168774,0.00021483659,0.000020416206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038298531,0.000047041605,0.00012240224,0.000035520818,0.00012245735,0.000011823681,0.00035708945,0.000028879407,0.000041040483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004837499,0.000030450003,0.000041965726,0.00032387386,0.00013647848,0.00011417491,0.0000232372,0.00042996582,2.3722819e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081194075,0.000112814916,0.42732385,0.000012422329,0.000029707757,1.6016287e-7,0.006298114,0.0002734565,0.0017014095,0.4272985,0.000012152537,0.1369293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059736107,0.000033757504,0.40417534,0.00013002713,0.000073686024,0.000024653933,0.15581529,0.002663061,0.002465539,0.43343908,0.00041329834,0.00016892486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77687985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96994734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1930675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008861538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009731973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275973070","doi":"","title":"The Trials and Tribulations of Personal Property Security Law Reform in Australia","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Law reform; Law; Property law; Law and economics; Political science; Property rights; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2305476651033335,"score_gpt":0.464407304604246,"score_spread":0.23385963950091251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275973070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.752591,0.00014951035,0.000009047847,0.030958207,0.00006185502,0.0005143406,0.00001222709,0.000018646128,0.21568514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923334,0.000021168042,0.000044421096,0.000018728773,0.000057843477,0.000015185377,0.0000010123833,0.0000014691287,0.0075067794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944955,0.00012888639,0.00012738824,0.00006153256,0.00013587142,0.00009674328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968773,0.00007648433,0.00005927491,0.000065095315,0.00005302852,0.000058407597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001962374,0.000029285091,0.00009152644,0.000008185653,0.00019258601,0.000031831205,0.00006758949,0.00003275045,0.00001712472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023589733,0.000015074452,0.000020200145,0.000112505135,0.00020941187,0.00006024087,0.000020941647,0.00005814859,0.0000051988236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014730668,0.000027406082,0.00057579594,0.0000029404443,0.000004493298,1.5516612e-7,0.073363185,0.0000021551136,0.00008713393,0.92476106,0.0008531514,0.00030778485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049530005,0.000027969045,0.0030473282,0.000010403387,0.0000108639015,3.5384423e-7,0.042552527,0.000163831,0.00019443865,0.016378032,0.9370426,0.00007637501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073029846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040667355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9361894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075036056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008949742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276289665","doi":"10.1515/9780748697755","title":"Trusts and Patrimonies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Law; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Relation (database); Appropriation; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Trust law; Public law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061434352808634365,"score_gpt":0.2671070681944161,"score_spread":0.20567271538578175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276289665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007454964,0.00026420844,0.000022493727,0.00019178998,0.00016744234,0.00026703373,0.00007702171,0.000106926025,0.99882853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004773603,0.0003722862,0.000068126305,0.000020996675,0.0004834927,6.085976e-7,0.000007299675,0.000012567731,0.994261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991069,0.000019035873,0.00009041487,0.00027720942,0.00031382445,0.00019263747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992322,0.000059313916,0.00011299255,0.00020892138,0.00014618626,0.00024039995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019269892,0.00015490055,0.00019144033,0.00006877763,0.0004965781,0.00006507556,0.0003110831,0.00030155852,0.00012698646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013849769,0.00017783201,0.00006972361,0.0000067236415,0.0004997435,0.00009105565,0.00024939602,0.00025599534,0.0000046585956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105179115,0.000003056296,0.0000036332715,0.0000041138396,0.000026181337,0.000014451766,0.0022874854,4.9110025e-7,9.4049125e-7,0.94572914,0.048293818,0.0036261517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016692627,0.000013025355,0.000002679176,0.000024599998,0.000075173426,5.614312e-7,0.00052076345,0.0000027945066,0.0000024134383,0.008481195,0.99050766,0.00020223482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027899288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034910365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94221383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014890157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023137167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7251779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277183366","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.1.3","title":"Proroguing the Parliament of Australia: The Effect on the Senate and the Conventions that Constrain the Prerogative Power","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Commonwealth; Prerogative; Constitution; Law; Scrutiny; Politics; Political science; Power (physics); House of Commons; Sociology","score_opus":0.06500949117634366,"score_gpt":0.35622047821575353,"score_spread":0.29121098703940984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277183366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11832453,0.0602611,0.000036682235,0.6489383,0.00046231606,0.01615132,0.000072429226,0.00006164558,0.1556917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345195,0.002237821,0.0000046736486,0.0028130934,0.00008229995,0.00072958687,0.0000010416566,0.0000053517824,0.00067416794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975039,0.0016253984,0.00020671565,0.00011267608,0.00030266913,0.00024864657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785644,0.0015022318,0.00020769106,0.0003526251,0.000040201132,0.000040793624],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004412304,0.00011649693,0.00018273474,0.0000026306598,0.0024115543,0.00015613313,0.000423824,0.000030489058,0.00019165367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017457064,0.000032763706,0.00016554694,0.00012091115,0.0019376619,0.00008702742,0.000087546345,0.00026085312,0.000037980255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040609107,0.000014740664,0.00021101921,0.00004529748,0.000045851724,5.282239e-8,0.0028719876,3.2851486e-7,0.0000041850035,0.99449444,0.0016605312,0.00064748985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002471194,0.000042725416,0.0015985634,0.00078402145,0.0001717594,0.0000034227335,0.0025709535,0.0000034124978,0.0001879516,0.0035910574,0.9907041,0.000094894094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013845747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005958753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024581695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026634467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227741215","doi":"","title":"AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF ANTITRUST LAW: BUSINESS MEETING: Toronto, Canada August 10, 1988 MINUTES","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Vice president; Law; Word (group theory); Political science; Management; Engineering; Advertising; Linguistics; Business; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011016102028500126,"score_gpt":0.2543102798364026,"score_spread":0.24329417780790247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227741215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22902519,0.000044836153,0.00020721072,0.012680443,0.0003482781,0.00019325195,0.000051142946,0.00007913371,0.75737053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578709,0.00007002224,0.0001948578,0.0001390376,0.00029920114,0.000009588393,0.000003368388,0.0000058761466,0.041407123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990972,0.000058472215,0.00016918128,0.00013990694,0.00033568798,0.000199551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991663,0.00014061661,0.00020212379,0.00011360062,0.00030710982,0.000070244874],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002854663,0.00006209697,0.000116628384,0.000008932815,0.00027851138,0.000029002651,0.00014115192,0.000042743166,0.0012075922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022781295,0.000046397767,0.000027923063,0.00019245697,0.00008590872,0.00023154849,0.000025387444,0.000023985933,0.000010872414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025691203,0.00018219894,0.09373539,0.00002801129,0.00010547848,0.0000010500409,0.0013863822,0.000016216312,0.013292611,0.5087466,0.3581311,0.024349213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011752054,0.000010407884,0.043864507,0.000012111945,0.000012824265,7.7009396e-8,0.0016419763,0.0000059436975,0.0013688735,0.00011890277,0.9527364,0.00011050397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99514383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7288458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091479375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004513168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278141419","doi":"","title":"An abuse of process - traditionally: Smith v Lucht [2014] QDC 302","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Political science; Action (physics); Law; Process (computing); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02353030970696702,"score_gpt":0.28159395008106713,"score_spread":0.2580636403741001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278141419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507785,0.00002461565,0.0006714353,0.002425331,0.000028240738,0.00018092568,0.000043349326,0.00013557798,0.04571206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997343,0.00008360572,0.0019409822,0.000012044649,0.000020685744,7.364519e-7,0.000006344701,0.0000044513426,0.0005881191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992718,0.00003224534,0.00011195315,0.00020728067,0.00021674093,0.00015995487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991785,0.000017175233,0.00014306833,0.0002881637,0.00026055143,0.00011248718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021810678,0.000072177674,0.00016034581,0.00016031733,0.0001941063,0.0000067032893,0.0006193101,0.0001810989,0.00009341885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035550285,0.00007886993,0.000044422162,0.00034541602,0.0007009723,0.00019135018,0.000040878745,0.00013626635,0.000037091493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010474301,0.0010465484,0.11177783,0.00005966666,0.000103092934,0.00001551335,0.019979788,0.00013898534,0.0007225483,0.8546897,0.0053177527,0.006043838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023714674,0.00028589022,0.12018034,0.0001021309,0.00012499392,0.0000060315233,0.06080962,0.00024749248,0.0032339105,0.09919934,0.71286273,0.00057608046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012742976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069159537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75549036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005669179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028159848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32162225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278469572","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4416","title":"INSTITUTIONAL INEQUALITY AND THE DYNAMICS OF COURAGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Status quo; Courage; Political science; Solidarity; Power (physics); Sociology; Inequality; Welfare economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04119052759485642,"score_gpt":0.34313834799685616,"score_spread":0.30194782040199974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278469572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8767941,0.00005714041,0.003444637,0.015507974,0.00009093595,0.00069257885,0.000039196715,0.000017720064,0.10335572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987524,0.000026742793,0.00034283183,0.00029977722,0.000086088716,0.0000294178,0.0000019518031,0.0000028261115,0.00045796335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993578,0.000058354213,0.00017604136,0.00009023279,0.0002182577,0.000099294615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933267,0.00021961518,0.00009481396,0.0001393896,0.00015291589,0.000060576003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000424455,0.000043841,0.00010669219,0.000025699064,0.00019173902,0.00006120095,0.00034654868,0.000035450408,0.0001450263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024917768,0.000031722047,0.00002540546,0.00015946987,0.00054679613,0.00024414386,0.00013497523,0.00006491122,0.00001678939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144638,0.000029503299,0.0022255136,0.000041634295,0.00000926592,9.279037e-8,0.0019867923,0.00010556434,0.00005963466,0.9935614,0.00036503733,0.0016010868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003433575,0.000099466175,0.81920975,0.00021997937,0.0005330363,0.000002260392,0.017144397,0.018213004,0.0007193563,0.06075997,0.07897174,0.000693433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009222939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072001456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024884448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010516797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279288638","doi":"10.7202/1027548ar","title":"Jacques Beaulne, La liquidation des successions, Collection Bleue, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2002, 446 pages, ISBN 2-89127-552-7","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0267622015676392,"score_gpt":0.28071464273306934,"score_spread":0.25395244116543014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279288638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.333848,0.055242177,0.012659788,0.024360308,0.0017641804,0.0018697594,0.00021690375,0.0005489696,0.5694899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53911036,0.070100725,0.010541936,0.00048125177,0.0011716844,0.0003662618,0.00013326954,0.000109611974,0.37798488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996569,0.0008753472,0.0006266671,0.0006533977,0.000399213,0.0008763949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980568,0.00034347034,0.00036879335,0.0005488221,0.00025395982,0.00042810032],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014204095,0.00028985972,0.00040856676,0.00015401265,0.0016978037,0.00036951277,0.0004121805,0.00054720714,0.0015135085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056622765,0.00041547467,0.00024344242,0.0015931141,0.0005556628,0.0008676747,0.00007427345,0.00052760274,0.00081626896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006256711,0.0011967021,0.0070366696,0.00045587076,0.00013553673,0.000040102554,0.0073325983,0.0009862616,0.002363109,0.728958,0.22233804,0.029094508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041000158,0.000080444406,0.002637808,0.00037666876,0.00014039686,0.000059793336,0.0009312501,0.00055343437,0.0008515857,0.037677653,0.955781,0.0004999778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013909929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023920082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73344296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009814705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042060073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279557094","doi":"10.4172/2169-0170.1000171","title":"Corporate Governance and the Business Judgment Rule: Fiduciary Duties of Directors in Canada and the Peoples Republic of China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Civil & Legal Sciences","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business judgment rule; Corporate governance; China; Statutory law; Statute; Corporate law; Business; Accounting; People's Republic; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.01417899975251771,"score_gpt":0.2366017304234648,"score_spread":0.2224227306709471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279557094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95515454,0.001640274,0.0000095341975,0.037273686,0.0001433467,0.00010522611,0.000009371221,0.0000012712525,0.00566277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964952,0.0031672271,0.000025862768,0.00006269426,0.00006220032,0.000002723828,2.8673702e-8,0.0000016655658,0.00018239106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854976,0.00019290061,0.00039030344,0.0000976462,0.00061735715,0.00015200887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807054,0.00070746127,0.00093583664,0.00008599029,0.00014988649,0.000050266808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002972983,0.00006419385,0.00023515272,0.000031571122,0.00030556446,0.00007156473,0.00042419997,0.000017334984,0.000029129988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074186095,0.000025577827,0.000035260953,0.0005338077,0.0025504697,0.0004460111,0.00007337541,0.000077550874,5.896055e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019000751,0.000051278505,0.21448012,0.000033210326,0.000030247453,0.0000035952514,0.0087590655,0.000090744616,0.00029320974,0.76441264,0.0010795061,0.010576385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009419997,0.000023914381,0.97751826,0.00016169393,0.000017077062,0.0000083529885,0.0028780655,0.000030516658,0.00017297866,0.010452664,0.0077221114,0.000072355164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8115165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9626199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76303816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007834893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021367571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9397312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279668188","doi":"","title":"Book Review: English Private Law edited by Peter Birks","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Law; Kingdom; Common law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.006411134418095388,"score_gpt":0.2677741661043712,"score_spread":0.26136303168627584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279668188","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012837994,0.7259767,0.002271904,0.017055107,0.0007431976,0.00069836393,0.000010115574,0.00016327719,0.25179756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10547993,0.81595075,0.00009987965,0.023176592,0.0021345743,0.000047885453,0.000010107324,0.000043657852,0.05305661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744684,0.00020525587,0.00024622932,0.00016498528,0.00033754145,0.0015991601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993751,0.00004168452,0.00013560765,0.0001590352,0.00013848655,0.00015005375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016671071,0.00010627087,0.00014678822,0.000023597191,0.0007650544,0.000100542646,0.00029162838,0.00007201099,0.00057664607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016978796,0.000093294875,0.00011287546,0.000223969,0.00011994525,0.00030555678,0.000013052216,0.00092796993,0.00008015894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016262969,0.000043797772,0.000025568761,0.000005243416,0.000023892046,4.760292e-7,0.00030285653,3.3662602e-7,0.000043068467,0.83570397,0.16322972,0.00061943755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017569904,0.00004125546,0.0000042040783,0.000031052026,0.000022743166,0.0000104733845,0.0002285536,5.773104e-7,0.000043478067,0.02646838,0.9728526,0.00012098596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011521679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005040635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8096229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005309703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009145112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63138705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279775422","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.003","title":"Trusts: the essentials","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03235138116290452,"score_gpt":0.2399973687562188,"score_spread":0.20764598759331426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279775422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004655371,0.00008425241,0.00012914946,0.0005420388,0.00017369373,0.0006432722,0.00011809897,0.00011412495,0.9981488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032956838,0.00024739015,0.000028808516,0.00013888818,0.00042186963,0.0000025748636,0.000013630949,0.000021371745,0.99582976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989561,0.000061147686,0.00012802401,0.00029335756,0.00030873992,0.00025265018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892765,0.00011122705,0.00017874019,0.0004806859,0.00015585923,0.00014580836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017211399,0.0001800934,0.00019325188,0.000045117333,0.001070054,0.00013784085,0.00085705344,0.00026861194,0.00010704632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013013286,0.0001605433,0.0001814408,0.000008987549,0.0006841703,0.000092058486,0.00026912196,0.00034110632,0.00022129138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002925412,0.0000031384554,2.4803649e-7,0.0000063487305,0.00003794331,0.000007026514,0.00022269409,3.860051e-7,0.0000056769154,0.8751916,0.12360941,0.0009125944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098229524,0.0000047223666,0.000006744821,0.000024575049,0.000103825216,6.5330795e-7,0.00029252403,0.000004873875,0.00002185503,0.00014241583,0.99910057,0.00019901549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004380507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007624816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87549114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001629851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001996382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8230098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281547316","doi":"","title":"Appeals and the British Columbia Court of Appeal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.005250886943123571,"score_gpt":0.25438494711599974,"score_spread":0.24913406017287618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281547316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9650556,0.0008649634,0.00045023003,0.0078080744,0.00013160295,0.0002213631,0.0000042643355,0.00001621112,0.025447704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911728,0.0029676363,0.000042020143,0.00007442051,0.00033069722,0.0000054343095,4.032118e-7,0.0000052517466,0.005401336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873954,0.00008029589,0.00015800344,0.000079866215,0.00020740887,0.0007348668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995826,0.00007311086,0.00011817327,0.00008566064,0.00007621161,0.000064259606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003037084,0.00003362951,0.00010026452,0.0000073641554,0.0014677913,0.00050144613,0.000258555,0.000050730385,0.00006194376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103065606,0.000034709552,0.0000543343,0.00010081549,0.0005441531,0.00008777489,0.000028565888,0.0010349083,0.000004190969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074091827,0.000027498736,0.0049669547,0.0000016291009,0.00003222018,3.7128663e-7,0.00067532103,4.6665042e-7,0.00017065112,0.96430826,0.0010123092,0.028796919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010732128,0.00003994474,0.0061699166,0.000009960635,0.00003347847,0.00017018717,0.0060444577,0.000026657837,0.000005756326,0.76522774,0.2210922,0.00010651405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06904032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76255673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6935164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005528251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001160386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281930280","doi":"","title":"Reflections of a Supervisory Order Sceptic: Ten Years after Doucet-Boudreau","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Competence (human resources); Legislature; Order (exchange); Legislation; Political science; Declaration; Skepticism; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.021374184181167807,"score_gpt":0.33474988746909323,"score_spread":0.3133757032879254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281930280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828406,0.0031099555,0.0045494745,0.015101161,0.00020368389,0.0003519666,0.00000757555,0.000098073746,0.09373752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99272954,0.0023658408,0.00037222702,0.00022209951,0.00037869753,0.000007341766,9.808924e-7,0.000008300932,0.0039149676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818873,0.00007989335,0.0002148648,0.00012766472,0.00027628426,0.0011125867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995178,0.000022728806,0.00008380722,0.00013916104,0.00014073127,0.00009579419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008992761,0.000076650256,0.00011732927,0.000086936874,0.00036747463,0.00005557268,0.0002552077,0.00007511187,0.00018206745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052640364,0.00007162377,0.00010032183,0.00045843492,0.00010425403,0.00018768373,0.000015218031,0.00076134177,0.00004762464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037275317,0.00019144245,0.00086822314,0.0000016351838,0.000057139925,0.000002017598,0.0047823163,0.000021599499,0.0010764926,0.94873744,0.00024674562,0.043977648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008463376,0.00051972177,0.027102053,0.000033444307,0.00010554533,0.00008750439,0.016018305,0.000020224785,0.000106843,0.70711577,0.24763474,0.00040953376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009634163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010556835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.247388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041841614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001959471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5890962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282589353","doi":"10.14288/1.0077670","title":"Directors’ duty of care, diligence and skill : a comparative study of Japanese and Canadian law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty of care; Diligence; Law; Duty; Business; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012521587716377508,"score_gpt":0.23303929518894725,"score_spread":0.22051770747256974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282589353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98640287,0.000050492,4.0823792e-7,0.0000332505,0.000026900332,0.00027819362,0.00012404093,0.0000072165803,0.013076599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997786,0.000024865521,0.00004097593,0.000004966688,0.0000077861205,4.6004166e-7,0.00000192996,0.000002025837,0.00013833589],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994993,0.00004075111,0.000068560934,0.00015616657,0.00012606605,0.0001091184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994379,0.00004632027,0.00007298224,0.000112688205,0.00018000108,0.0001500608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011197167,0.000021212001,0.00016349656,0.00002008755,0.00038258298,0.000027202606,0.00015350588,0.000047268717,0.000027464981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001418777,0.00006313064,0.000021012163,0.00016281485,0.0007484386,0.00013413564,0.000055789395,0.000072325034,4.8265844e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012041798,0.00054687314,0.42190084,0.00011703421,0.00008515642,0.000024026438,0.51636356,0.0000028523518,0.0009357967,0.0014789369,0.00022191281,0.058310956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020399113,0.000052423093,0.85763013,0.000013275761,0.000016651127,9.082868e-7,0.14138882,0.000005409376,0.0000013867608,0.000055619337,0.0005774827,0.000053924246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99982196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4357293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020646861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001070692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29425576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283123882","doi":"","title":"Directions to Convict","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convict; Jury; Sanctions; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Jury trial; Business","score_opus":0.00805930213869166,"score_gpt":0.28745944434127707,"score_spread":0.2794001422025854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283123882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29495296,0.0018007506,0.026337774,0.0577019,0.00052908505,0.00045250938,0.0000073876818,0.00022405725,0.6179936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96934706,0.00057073036,0.00010432272,0.00015369119,0.0009135762,0.000010241142,8.997063e-7,0.0000068627855,0.028892627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983721,0.000048283164,0.00012041951,0.00009285616,0.00017918512,0.001187201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997084,0.00002737627,0.00004146789,0.00007414694,0.000063084895,0.00008548618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008473548,0.000049744653,0.00005825475,0.00005028513,0.0009805097,0.00008835834,0.00018202883,0.0000334045,0.00008102702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033682438,0.00004682287,0.000056471796,0.0002808625,0.000041966876,0.000100680554,0.000014109207,0.00049204467,0.00020792347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017462814,0.000025602005,0.0006374185,1.467343e-7,0.0000073171686,2.2990528e-7,0.00023449548,0.000023074599,0.00011220362,0.99188596,0.0011348628,0.0059369574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007268137,0.000022594699,0.0011225367,0.0000015964761,0.0000065373315,0.00001111484,0.0016655268,0.000002941684,0.000022264237,0.2333706,0.763638,0.00006359231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006253077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0630332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76250315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006869121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013219389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.954064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283532380","doi":"","title":"A ‘Real and Substantial’ Improvement? Van Breda Reformulates the Law of Jurisdiction in Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Doctrine; Scrutiny; Assertion; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.017180844954554207,"score_gpt":0.2577566403773341,"score_spread":0.24057579542277988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283532380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501683,0.0001281921,0.00009657865,0.0003889082,0.00003622547,0.00012114912,7.004482e-7,0.0000071106365,0.049052842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774694,0.001409344,0.00002602299,0.0000219941,0.000052311214,0.000004026617,4.6909224e-7,0.0000041704584,0.00073470245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998942,0.000039821545,0.00018096576,0.000079198675,0.00013996939,0.0006180049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997266,0.000014894338,0.000109487504,0.000075434305,0.00003726251,0.000036344907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011716223,0.00005097781,0.00007299199,0.000027379465,0.00035337234,0.000025955498,0.00015578205,0.00004089125,0.000042834672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004585533,0.000035147867,0.000034245393,0.000098319666,0.00012607282,0.00017436563,0.00002074175,0.00059542427,0.0000018216379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018529572,0.000033856024,0.007291093,6.6315584e-7,0.000017722587,2.1024324e-7,0.012610621,7.568978e-7,0.0004947203,0.9761931,0.0000016689781,0.0033371097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059199287,0.00030319934,0.039474588,0.0000127398425,0.00003397459,0.000014216229,0.017311176,0.000017183218,0.0006502654,0.9318097,0.009653388,0.0001275522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5678702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.969347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4014768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005911238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011390427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4350074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283753333","doi":"","title":"La consécration par la Cour suprême du Canada d'un principe directeur imposant l'exécution du contrat de bonne foi. Variations sur le droit commun","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recueil Dalloz","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01606140242673062,"score_gpt":0.23392655419616937,"score_spread":0.21786515176943874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283753333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8174748,0.0027539907,0.0059641125,0.08922677,0.0014267004,0.001232619,0.00077100476,0.00025847685,0.08089153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930993,0.0013151332,0.00082572846,0.0005468769,0.0006184243,0.00012440281,0.00018596083,0.000038430295,0.003245756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962681,0.0015242378,0.00058224937,0.0004016704,0.00058127125,0.00064247806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723005,0.0009411544,0.0003362653,0.00044196265,0.0004916842,0.00055886054],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025396203,0.0002851222,0.00037170528,0.000046391113,0.0011013405,0.00029766047,0.00050950894,0.00036415833,0.0001244863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085320167,0.000324018,0.000121862155,0.0005156831,0.000428199,0.00053436955,0.0001361699,0.00048478012,0.000056255853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003510618,0.00067251665,0.011981843,0.00003274206,0.00013195562,0.000054002438,0.00853062,0.00038294558,0.0006154655,0.95011634,0.022398742,0.0050477204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001352457,0.000056231118,0.019671371,0.00005646087,0.00012753932,0.00006999699,0.001963447,0.0075290813,0.00039515705,0.00822067,0.9601074,0.00045021536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8588239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.867781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94189566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012418014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008437528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283895241","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139005302.005","title":"Unequal transactions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.054205197216962535,"score_gpt":0.23937472253632422,"score_spread":0.18516952531936168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283895241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012112381,0.00003738959,0.004514093,0.00006290723,0.0001585896,0.00033018837,0.0002920545,0.00017563286,0.994417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067080413,0.00020401289,0.00007346287,0.00004166739,0.00016157136,0.0000011694257,0.000014484057,0.000023971814,0.9927716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908096,0.000034559223,0.00011720225,0.0003069509,0.00022097782,0.00023934426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991888,0.000041789506,0.00011704113,0.00032441053,0.00011770165,0.00021030336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010085305,0.00017657173,0.00018890173,0.00008127529,0.00078078377,0.000038411163,0.00047978494,0.00033472094,0.000092156326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003142431,0.00022231879,0.00019813435,0.000008722552,0.00045356716,0.000089323104,0.000049756414,0.00036345777,0.0000827613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010340135,0.000008258991,1.889502e-7,0.000008199211,0.00004338676,0.00001847513,0.00055449957,7.097173e-7,0.000002600768,0.990026,0.0069329585,0.0023943768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012818378,0.000011321369,0.0000028255065,0.00002423268,0.00013239474,5.7964695e-7,0.00015196284,0.0000031187242,0.000021373879,0.000091841066,0.9991823,0.00024987012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004383795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018056176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018707039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002561052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90658975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284167226","doi":"","title":"Solving the \"Khadr Problem\": Retention of Jurisdiction – A Comparative Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Prerogative; Charter; Law; Legitimacy; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.044208402781296376,"score_gpt":0.33394452287516324,"score_spread":0.28973612009386684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284167226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7179696,0.0028005098,0.09899598,0.01632201,0.00022197292,0.0007213577,0.000007020052,0.00007895505,0.1628826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756485,0.00047609195,0.00012725298,0.000014007677,0.00016777671,0.000007669614,0.0000021697558,0.0000024996675,0.0016376905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985514,0.00020514241,0.00020791736,0.00008812019,0.00033661755,0.0006108024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932635,0.000037437356,0.00023968652,0.000095649535,0.00023816573,0.000062715255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033419612,0.000051451272,0.000118095835,0.00007708153,0.00055031583,0.000059814323,0.00021634981,0.00003632372,0.00001788192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035553952,0.00003574261,0.0001278914,0.0007291327,0.000113587026,0.00018782112,0.00001879849,0.000524589,0.000008999051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011838384,0.000036536298,0.002103503,6.779773e-7,0.00031834588,7.012338e-8,0.009067244,0.0005287059,0.00009420686,0.9863341,0.00020190206,0.0013028797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005131449,0.00022169558,0.0034695973,0.000012477495,0.00082225027,0.000012563714,0.0984796,0.0019342448,0.00009979229,0.8267369,0.067515396,0.00018232355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019635444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019376513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27959526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052535173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015896874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2284807334","doi":"10.4337/9781781001844.00027","title":"What makes a good law of security?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law; Legislation; Flexibility (engineering); Commission; Security interest; Personal property; Government (linguistics); Business; Law reform; Political science; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Economics; Management","score_opus":0.05386183991491904,"score_gpt":0.3023211428072558,"score_spread":0.24845930289233675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2284807334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037167032,0.00084958033,0.000012391537,0.00308489,0.0011361351,0.0004678837,0.00009707255,0.00019056382,0.9941243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04695686,0.0001320103,0.00023759325,0.0006109857,0.0019805466,0.00003604624,0.000077353056,0.000086688255,0.9498819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974644,0.00006832889,0.0004785402,0.00046072414,0.0011144542,0.00041355446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782807,0.00015086104,0.00045901374,0.0006193115,0.0006102126,0.0003325375],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015264665,0.00028617593,0.00045824604,0.00012212127,0.00040751722,0.0026528935,0.0010916739,0.0006915009,0.00030543955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017903332,0.00029186584,0.00024540507,0.00003920481,0.00063151395,0.0017901476,0.00031445624,0.00078344083,0.000104919905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004285412,0.000011495055,0.0000016504878,0.000029185638,0.000045979705,0.0000034470397,0.0088444725,4.7600838e-7,0.0000028375928,0.9554474,0.030935992,0.0046728035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010737482,0.000016123307,5.8163926e-7,0.00016022054,0.000036645637,9.308932e-7,0.000993843,0.0000012638388,0.000013288715,0.28590757,0.71253943,0.00022274927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037818984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012146812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68160343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021901642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007840235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286749767","doi":"10.5040/9781782256595.ch-005","title":"A Common Law of Tort: Is there a European Rift in the Common Law Family?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Common law; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.05292366498892963,"score_gpt":0.2866313062738123,"score_spread":0.23370764128488264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286749767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004637195,0.00015741492,0.000004901803,0.0057054046,0.00013274337,0.0005075767,0.00021163994,0.00007956862,0.99273705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6258928,0.000025156982,0.000026672298,0.0050857402,0.00054243737,0.000027759559,0.000021373928,0.000055776025,0.36832228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978861,0.00027156237,0.00048539467,0.00035089854,0.0006668433,0.0003391571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983254,0.00029398303,0.00036755434,0.0007904806,0.00011875643,0.00010383967],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001975156,0.0002392558,0.00035258447,0.00006136935,0.0005709807,0.0011458846,0.001646207,0.000272609,0.00015243811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001997403,0.00016434629,0.00019706058,0.000034160224,0.00078548887,0.00051097077,0.00027318837,0.0007058297,0.000105549174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038563294,0.000015332442,0.000022538165,0.000013876921,0.000016942757,0.0000078895455,0.0076611764,6.326737e-8,0.000018923356,0.96947175,0.01936832,0.0033993367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014661766,0.000015808746,0.00008646726,0.0002231545,0.000019990272,7.450812e-7,0.0004376332,5.5887045e-7,0.000010053996,0.09583251,0.90303564,0.0001908271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011266337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04871491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8836673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007904541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012243632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286924293","doi":"10.29173/alr1440","title":"Resulting Trusts in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Constructive trust; Unjust enrichment; Certainty; Predictability; Trust law; Law and economics; Key (lock); Express trust; Business; Constructive; Law; Blind trust; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Process (computing); Computer security; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01813767615996056,"score_gpt":0.2982003670185493,"score_spread":0.28006269085858876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286924293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016353073,0.009451605,1.4275663e-7,0.019755896,0.000028371478,0.00030700883,0.0000023151579,0.0000069804123,0.9540946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95242715,0.03122683,0.00004176916,0.008177359,0.00006835016,0.000046027344,0.0000045780203,0.000005771928,0.008002182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993162,0.000074599084,0.00018356279,0.00011663202,0.00012840214,0.00018058684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960214,0.00014165437,0.000029665704,0.00014716532,0.000012413832,0.00006697312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019597338,0.00004552794,0.000118511016,0.0000031815002,0.00015938106,0.000014020464,0.00017190895,0.000015443546,0.0020705343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008086341,0.000040825216,0.000024405683,0.00021832557,0.000030486293,0.00006856644,0.0000096004505,0.00006628297,0.00016993287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000101158,0.000015690039,0.0017067061,0.00014339853,0.000003699743,0.0000032503542,0.00044238573,0.0000055134897,8.5506895e-7,0.8653649,0.008461602,0.12385097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003638105,7.8940906e-7,0.00040119357,0.00034857728,0.0000042994693,2.84622e-7,0.00003393176,0.0000050021786,0.0000010335475,0.00013846913,0.9989739,0.000056103603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016415166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045262367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288251512","doi":"10.5040/9781509907373.ch-012","title":"Will-Substitutes and Creditors: Canada and the US","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.014751179162482999,"score_gpt":0.22315037304718316,"score_spread":0.20839919388470016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288251512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002360834,0.00029736114,0.000012049607,0.013237414,0.0007170104,0.00029460582,0.00010000399,0.000050990817,0.9850545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04824879,0.0001263387,0.000039446495,0.0011341063,0.0046684584,0.000038642982,0.00000854318,0.000027421109,0.9457083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988457,0.000033420234,0.00018105216,0.0002804749,0.0004276619,0.00023169919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892527,0.0003804679,0.0001490775,0.0002504106,0.00011853245,0.00017622001],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006144231,0.00015758445,0.00019511615,0.00003153133,0.0009336591,0.0017114131,0.00036630532,0.00019706851,0.000086869535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002598932,0.000098894576,0.000040183626,0.000009826361,0.00092281745,0.0006733825,0.00018102839,0.00031912338,0.0000039606293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028855864,5.116593e-7,0.000017215714,0.0000054030756,0.000017800827,0.0000018988637,0.00057902734,2.8312725e-8,0.0000012471206,0.94010514,0.055224653,0.0040441607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019195731,0.0000021105948,0.000037452057,0.00005878778,0.000024621524,0.0000015437479,0.000053537202,0.000001107956,0.0000013737307,0.049837302,0.94964725,0.0001429485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4737199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.834464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8944226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010406038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090943783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288751138","doi":"","title":"Perez v Fernandez: Australia's First Decision on the Moral Right of Integrity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.16465806715027262,"score_gpt":0.37233947714757853,"score_spread":0.20768140999730592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288751138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99017316,0.000018219822,0.00001880355,0.0052171065,0.00005550599,0.0005498071,0.000016103835,0.000013558209,0.0039377273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663176,0.00007918939,0.00017461008,0.000005857135,0.00007092584,0.0000032835437,0.0000019255392,0.000004378893,0.033342235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983733,0.00025542674,0.00015203161,0.0002453786,0.00067255186,0.00030128736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987015,0.00035622923,0.00011547555,0.00030511047,0.00035241607,0.00016923538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074920885,0.000089564135,0.00016853695,0.0000733362,0.0013045969,0.000101183505,0.0005780333,0.00014276156,0.00044678478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050491824,0.00006730893,0.000085169784,0.00023847673,0.0013325713,0.00026443854,0.0001857923,0.0004379461,0.00006758988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003180624,0.0009564708,0.5471732,0.00036003595,0.00021672355,0.000066799425,0.027957905,0.000027473325,0.013732959,0.3465419,0.05892977,0.0037186886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005316663,0.0003601878,0.9032494,0.00035957893,0.00003556027,0.000005760227,0.024225043,0.000088972316,0.010487583,0.0043906304,0.056008074,0.0002575787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0584615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012130833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35607615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000611997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007930665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288936020","doi":"","title":"Litigation Privilege: Timeless or Transient? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Adversarial system; Political science; Governor; Economic Justice; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.013772687038745537,"score_gpt":0.29773114952466134,"score_spread":0.28395846248591583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288936020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.917788,0.00055919815,0.019858753,0.00832566,0.0004398638,0.00037084694,0.00001799252,0.00003174607,0.052607916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942409,0.00043155334,0.00008268683,0.00014178971,0.00040755453,0.0000018603356,0.0000027983692,0.000008056931,0.0046828296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979645,0.00005218231,0.0002861205,0.00010494151,0.0004083568,0.0011838888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940115,0.00009898989,0.00015535789,0.00009309094,0.00012972197,0.00012170379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018114622,0.00007166763,0.00010907733,0.000038562608,0.0004261334,0.000029337756,0.0002462772,0.000054581433,0.00009792836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059229118,0.000059594597,0.000047547157,0.0002363117,0.00008753191,0.00012010209,0.000009472387,0.0005288186,0.000004651395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006871062,0.0000727046,0.00055816816,0.000016932398,0.000055808403,0.0000054171765,0.0031689892,0.000021263453,0.0005199956,0.9731995,0.0006472338,0.021665312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014227238,0.00035059042,0.0076269847,0.000079382946,0.00028339887,0.00012025334,0.07246278,0.00007410573,0.002000126,0.049203586,0.8658273,0.0005487366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11718526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95894295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92399585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093946035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009724247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289204104","doi":"","title":"Loyalty and Politics: From Case Law to Statute Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Loyalty; Statute; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.06691496432112619,"score_gpt":0.36142300513393355,"score_spread":0.29450804081280735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289204104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24054554,0.000028877932,0.0003744708,0.00816825,0.000056319608,0.00013485548,0.00007225607,0.00005969953,0.75055975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98978466,0.0000021628978,0.0024807898,0.0035122286,0.00020868826,0.000007639137,0.000002965043,0.0000034332434,0.0039974316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995271,0.000025561121,0.000066160865,0.000115179624,0.00010915199,0.00015686985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940914,0.000044685446,0.000010960681,0.00010950088,0.0000510535,0.000374649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013967683,0.000037587142,0.00005071153,0.000006034333,0.00029754476,0.00010368546,0.000067005196,0.000028676315,0.00010727606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002064399,0.0000327272,0.0000102163685,0.000052606458,0.00013538952,0.00009952689,0.0000534324,0.000035931007,0.00014997869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.4141466e-7,0.000008955563,0.00007017183,3.320663e-7,0.0000019554989,0.000012718505,0.003869768,0.000001148792,0.000004987308,0.9927512,0.0030911742,0.00018698085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008302208,0.000009387931,0.00004156151,0.0000010366962,0.0000039986994,0.0000022421332,0.003820941,0.000013356307,0.000056504847,0.041254316,0.954655,0.000058615384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46810344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21039155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95156384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037694466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006128083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8040167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290446389","doi":"","title":"Abusive or Unconscionable Clauses from a Common Law Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Unconscionability; Law; Perspective (graphical); Variety (cybernetics); Common law; Good faith; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0214632278646042,"score_gpt":0.30246412754324054,"score_spread":0.28100089967863634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290446389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39707804,0.00006183578,0.000076747805,0.006750471,0.0001057178,0.00016513903,0.000049941817,0.000058340123,0.5956538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886684,0.000072915405,0.0022723281,0.000074592215,0.0000927752,3.7772426e-7,0.000004066175,0.0000042633555,0.008810311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994104,0.000043136355,0.000041642816,0.00017295683,0.00017490279,0.0001569642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931574,0.00012475152,0.000080060534,0.00020774314,0.00016099314,0.000110719964],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010266225,0.00006359017,0.00012826308,0.000009491748,0.00072194607,0.000022122753,0.00034546928,0.00009372286,0.025853278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002349781,0.0000693196,0.000060856397,0.00006191632,0.00052154803,0.0004474946,0.00008928137,0.00012058107,0.000061087296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046482695,0.00007284373,0.00052853755,0.0000017613102,0.00002927723,0.0000045919546,0.08160999,0.0000016685872,0.0012252389,0.914209,0.0011553253,0.0011152724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065723166,0.00006280077,0.057936057,0.000015406766,0.00007210542,5.1539416e-7,0.5677888,0.000053657754,0.00014848736,0.009664537,0.36334044,0.00025996397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95423025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98569506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9045445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002320667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019603924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9750372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290993188","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4549","title":"Taking Workers’ Rights Seriously: Private Prosecutions of Employment Standards Violations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Business; Compliance (psychology); Law; Stigma (botany); Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.0647588706876264,"score_gpt":0.37551215272765415,"score_spread":0.3107532820400277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290993188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9106219,0.000065361135,0.0038601244,0.001433072,0.00016135362,0.0009670186,0.00014351925,0.00008464137,0.082663015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964689,0.000030009609,0.0022660682,0.00008017511,0.00017338146,0.00005666505,0.000004714771,0.00001176209,0.0009083234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985241,0.00005884305,0.0003494744,0.00020954586,0.00060345395,0.00025457863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988439,0.000094649055,0.00026791758,0.0002871569,0.00036065464,0.0001457029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003339989,0.00010076138,0.00019031952,0.000114043796,0.00072177313,0.00004881279,0.00051600597,0.00007026663,0.0002807291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016535656,0.00009804257,0.00007119463,0.00058513816,0.00025902223,0.00034386845,0.0001461677,0.0001084235,0.000017968357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002727079,0.0013779706,0.14877558,0.00037134165,0.00032767563,0.000020695807,0.094951615,0.0059916307,0.007834576,0.7210858,0.014388618,0.0046018013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075438025,0.00014157727,0.45604858,0.00042273002,0.00034508653,0.0000028498785,0.0020939126,0.00013326865,0.006199712,0.0027509704,0.53055006,0.00055686495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003607063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000951255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71833485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012651896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003936094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5551368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294554511","doi":"","title":"Beyond Real and Substantial Connection: The Muscutt Quintet","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Appeal; Connection (principal bundle); Law; Political science; Test (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.01677404947289747,"score_gpt":0.2757890537461873,"score_spread":0.25901500427328983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294554511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6427917,0.004268591,0.001275528,0.05493023,0.000456872,0.00030248368,0.0000043999203,0.00008150107,0.2958887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760889,0.017110791,0.000012116584,0.00013333303,0.00088547077,0.000004534058,4.1068537e-7,0.0000065518266,0.0057578892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984943,0.00010387345,0.00013147212,0.00011032426,0.00021371723,0.0009462734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996342,0.00006959553,0.000072857445,0.000093714094,0.000054414806,0.000075184675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011850825,0.00006408146,0.00006935011,0.000024480527,0.001499067,0.00014170172,0.00020595588,0.00004717592,0.00023605075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041176452,0.000045147233,0.000051475337,0.00017138607,0.00020042952,0.00015515994,0.000020601756,0.0007932234,0.000036854683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037026414,0.000016468928,0.00028675832,3.69482e-7,0.000020713973,5.651054e-7,0.0023789897,0.0000015085324,0.000044902165,0.9845455,0.0006218873,0.012078597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052827643,0.00015584135,0.0011458233,0.000005511026,0.000048918577,0.0002114484,0.032490775,0.00017060111,0.000021266926,0.538725,0.4262911,0.00020540823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014865517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026773646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4458205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002634814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033111635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295058275","doi":"","title":"The Liability of Auditors beyond Their Clients: A Comparative Study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal liability; English law; Duty of care; Audit; Law; Liability; Insolvency; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Corporate law; Strict liability; Delict; Tort; Business; Shareholder; Creditor; Scholarship; Accounting; Political science; Comparative law; Commercial law; Private law; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.026301192138684412,"score_gpt":0.3435495991130119,"score_spread":0.3172484069743275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295058275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764285,0.0005891656,0.00027105949,0.0020160675,0.00018469697,0.00035367117,0.0000021689493,0.000014062936,0.020140618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963651,0.0013697828,0.000005556095,0.000016323927,0.0004020183,0.000013436467,3.1078307e-7,0.000003943899,0.0018235489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998032,0.00031719546,0.00025630405,0.000116128715,0.0003059588,0.0009724619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999201,0.0002170648,0.00017842757,0.00017190288,0.0001659398,0.00006566295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034903937,0.00007371852,0.00012687682,0.00002168572,0.0014265778,0.00006555503,0.00045811592,0.000030545856,0.000024580042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008494697,0.000045014574,0.00008431004,0.00030114182,0.0002578009,0.0001266489,0.000037350375,0.00073476287,0.000012900083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005945783,0.00071596634,0.05062567,6.138865e-7,0.00013890237,3.6846967e-7,0.025519995,0.000027471946,0.0000375033,0.9076013,0.00031385355,0.014958917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051788933,0.00050312426,0.014769338,0.0000039607353,0.000030393023,0.0000072514144,0.3079548,0.000028221219,0.000020602181,0.40962002,0.26641697,0.00012745734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007980933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032917146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49798128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004984573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014035621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295351461","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3325567","title":"Accounting for Risk: the Advent of Capped Conveyancing Title Insurance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Conveyancing; Business; Actuarial science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023808838581043264,"score_gpt":0.3118733381809001,"score_spread":0.2880644995998568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295351461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84767264,0.005092561,0.0332555,0.0065452275,0.0006148542,0.000579115,0.000019925154,0.000041861018,0.10617829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976965,0.0003349324,0.000059657417,0.000022722526,0.00026709694,0.000004122843,2.797155e-7,0.000003387277,0.0016112826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993955,0.000028561308,0.000080939615,0.000035792633,0.00010578399,0.00035343785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970746,0.000040467676,0.000102257305,0.00004661665,0.00008059074,0.000022623892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016712535,0.000023050266,0.000039658316,0.000008944478,0.00028150715,0.000022409666,0.0001317978,0.000016785503,0.000011315676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013108242,0.000016012975,0.000032979373,0.00006227841,0.000044831173,0.000044111228,0.00000828264,0.00023477974,0.00001859055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067917845,0.000014772871,0.0043133437,0.0000019878667,0.000023543596,3.8555495e-8,0.002300383,0.000038589267,0.000049829272,0.972349,0.0011149549,0.019786756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003206305,0.000039306244,0.0010023895,0.000009155587,0.000017551,0.000004294774,0.009781364,0.0001475021,0.00009204563,0.2789001,0.7096153,0.000070419126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006261407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020945906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7085003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015028007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001364236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24200961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296193066","doi":"","title":"Equity and trusts : commentary and materials (6th edition)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; High Court; Supreme court; Fiduciary; Equity (law); Statutory law; Law; Unconscionability; Estoppel; Political science; Duty; Doctrine","score_opus":0.030872604963333515,"score_gpt":0.2587661934669966,"score_spread":0.22789358850366306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296193066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91770303,0.000033851826,0.00011038339,0.0030107466,0.00012316677,0.0001289628,0.00008497001,0.00003394819,0.07877094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978579,0.000019125242,0.00017629284,0.00009033341,0.00010106626,2.3917065e-7,0.000014695778,0.0000029990663,0.0017373355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994662,0.000031103707,0.00006782434,0.00013465575,0.00019107085,0.00010914094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956906,0.00003293119,0.0000768713,0.00009230229,0.000061214654,0.00016764762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013376662,0.000051991112,0.00009620724,0.00002304882,0.00037730156,0.00014847517,0.00013977718,0.000042290023,0.000010972006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017729672,0.00006388244,0.000018894685,0.000060480495,0.00034507847,0.0007801752,0.00032297237,0.000035953395,0.0000058727264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007154355,0.0013508361,0.12774368,0.00030644995,0.00042058996,0.0003033814,0.09169718,0.000016481032,0.011094838,0.37713888,0.32021454,0.0689977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014194372,0.0002269474,0.08361607,0.00006302156,0.00007929754,0.000026708487,0.044762373,0.00003453069,0.0011087297,0.01292752,0.8552677,0.00046768738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015850244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022891349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53505313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057557587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047730664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29019368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297388460","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Canadian Defamation Law as Applied to Corporate Plaintiffs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Falsity; Damages; Reputation; Law; Tort; Political science; Liability; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020971721582765536,"score_gpt":0.26020364175015326,"score_spread":0.23923192016738773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297388460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5461175,0.00011432072,0.0035783676,0.03473279,0.00021629898,0.0008254787,0.0000030462777,0.00008553094,0.41432667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433446,0.00011489658,0.00021695955,0.001640034,0.0003426831,0.00003409113,0.0000038372245,0.000012422343,0.0033006005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977209,0.0000593989,0.00018084352,0.00014326882,0.00026585165,0.0016297635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992164,0.000028777245,0.00013054919,0.00011654526,0.00012925894,0.00037851647],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014413354,0.000082317914,0.0000886122,0.00008228353,0.0015251999,0.00032386204,0.00032101938,0.00008237162,0.0002399727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047360656,0.00008002046,0.00004064681,0.0002757905,0.00006470025,0.0002315143,0.000018976143,0.000808103,0.0013586138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017018782,0.000005533864,0.000073811476,4.8712127e-7,0.000011880273,3.4848563e-7,0.0026717654,0.000031907584,0.00020978473,0.99070156,0.00026531977,0.006025901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091455215,0.000023753442,0.0002574742,0.000005096584,0.000006762031,0.0000102089525,0.0038179383,0.000017029797,0.000043778244,0.9111969,0.08441532,0.00011428859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48015228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9074881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44821697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017339345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004204305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297933009","doi":"","title":"Varying the Terms of A Trust - A New Power for the Courts?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Property (philosophy); Law; Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Power of attorney; Sociology; Law and economics; Genealogy; History; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Physics","score_opus":0.020531570139636454,"score_gpt":0.31211179774895914,"score_spread":0.2915802276093227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297933009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27167538,0.00968191,0.20351605,0.3478387,0.00085522694,0.0024995068,0.000013519621,0.000093835595,0.16382587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98805654,0.002421998,0.00004296383,0.00022658509,0.0004995982,0.000011414521,2.3302637e-7,0.0000068105173,0.008733835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868655,0.0000397214,0.00014588992,0.000069113725,0.00019869416,0.00086003233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947226,0.00018665222,0.00012305132,0.00012649156,0.000044407494,0.000047158097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016459749,0.000052290467,0.00006798817,0.000015663167,0.0010610955,0.00007376278,0.00045980155,0.000031095788,0.00007837231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008198452,0.000027257669,0.00010893052,0.00014159341,0.000105355946,0.000091815506,0.000018825496,0.0004831397,0.000005499624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017929859,0.00001891585,0.0003819704,4.0392823e-7,0.000046844838,1.2452807e-7,0.0028146275,0.000028797082,0.00007325216,0.9759764,0.00074825017,0.01989245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002689394,0.000057621815,0.0003267713,0.0000047024996,0.00003380543,0.000030168992,0.0060678683,0.000093056806,0.00001281701,0.42064282,0.57240826,0.000053157888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010434786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032890865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7163812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018920729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015174348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8161196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298303551","doi":"","title":"Pure Economic Loss ‑ Has the High Court Reinvented the Square Wheel?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"High Court; Ex-ante; Point (geometry); Liability; Economics; Square (algebra); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.013455144413261472,"score_gpt":0.2650351697936472,"score_spread":0.25158002538038576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298303551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6269448,0.0018782903,0.00029161686,0.3417597,0.000231629,0.0004661651,0.000013843154,0.00006826799,0.028345695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802402,0.0049596434,0.0000051907577,0.0004918886,0.0011103405,0.000016829812,0.0000029620292,0.000012626902,0.013160299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978807,0.00019632679,0.0002069225,0.0001441924,0.00024041692,0.0013314277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994483,0.00007478,0.000109260756,0.00024985845,0.00004096119,0.00007685296],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019385819,0.0000998909,0.00009699796,0.000017644263,0.0029212523,0.00032396778,0.0007979511,0.00006579777,0.0012486525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001751805,0.000056742683,0.0001239792,0.0001373005,0.00034851398,0.00016748482,0.00002360731,0.0013217037,0.0004665162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012489132,0.000021421189,0.00024077158,5.64966e-7,0.000053541717,0.0000011324474,0.0019991032,0.00027081397,0.0000049995847,0.97935104,0.004056984,0.013987161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019761536,0.00003659456,0.00038245582,0.00000443626,0.000023247547,0.000058158254,0.0058029536,0.000059779195,0.000007118722,0.27425542,0.71908236,0.00008984067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032953657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036901586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71502537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087424624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002607485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298861215","doi":"","title":"Security Interests in Goods Held for Lease: The Double Perfection Requirement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Security interest; Bankruptcy; Lien; Supreme court; Lease; Personal property; Business; Debtor; Obligation; Law and economics; Law; Appeal; Database transaction; Statute; Payment; Creditor; Debt; Economics; Finance; Property (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.15335313374331339,"score_gpt":0.4275052391118686,"score_spread":0.2741521053685552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298861215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6623068,0.00009715981,0.000983465,0.01195609,0.00023740005,0.0009912092,0.000002283645,0.000059325866,0.32336625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629474,0.000023475077,0.00008291979,0.00008122695,0.00011506694,0.00012516804,9.285677e-7,0.0000033835902,0.0032730799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956506,0.000035557496,0.000069385256,0.00010238079,0.00008299083,0.00014461737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997574,0.00003218154,0.00003243282,0.00012378066,0.00001997759,0.000034191737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045909558,0.000038609214,0.00004359595,0.000013843462,0.00025652794,0.000027284952,0.00013848749,0.00003286428,0.00018341874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024972405,0.000029238106,0.000030693016,0.000116374824,0.00006595812,0.00007285713,0.00002974622,0.000066072585,0.00002714867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000809303,0.00018381373,0.004129922,0.00001565864,0.00000921811,4.673374e-7,0.19263662,0.000006089225,0.00044901838,0.7960849,0.0044899466,0.0019134061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071682734,0.000090757705,0.010309919,0.00002589473,0.000015884105,4.467059e-7,0.037746504,0.00016978198,0.0033689127,0.017444866,0.92993474,0.00017546737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01934654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037205297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007251091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043293352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9871837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299386796","doi":"","title":"Mental distress and punitive damages for Breach of contract in the supreme Court of Canada: Here´s the remedy, but Where`s the right?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of business law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Damages; Breach of contract; Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01814942003886001,"score_gpt":0.28189528210765485,"score_spread":0.26374586206879486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299386796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82521105,0.00074594625,0.00010182398,0.16240036,0.00011936535,0.0005379563,0.00015769212,0.0000019549218,0.01072383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927443,0.00016240093,0.000024549383,0.00032650263,0.00013620862,0.0000033370309,0.0000015006245,0.0000025688742,0.000068501184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991002,0.00011506279,0.0002767577,0.000049937844,0.00033305446,0.00012495335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987584,0.00042400375,0.00033705184,0.000104687046,0.00034771953,0.00002818489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009209314,0.00005847591,0.00015514986,0.000011909671,0.00034677022,0.00004711251,0.00038303045,0.000027530583,0.00001160535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007771348,0.000026314916,0.00004071513,0.00015631093,0.00035490785,0.00014309517,0.000014853912,0.0001213871,2.9650602e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024261457,0.0004964574,0.003988887,0.00005036103,0.00011241795,0.00001652362,0.017568676,0.00012974312,0.0027214147,0.9593416,0.009220915,0.006110387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017486643,0.00013597836,0.6371624,0.000271849,0.00016354404,0.000057617606,0.04080076,0.0001540672,0.0013586294,0.014245702,0.30369297,0.00020780896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21849495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6609309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046614914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029315104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7867092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300086060","doi":"10.71781/1957","title":"L'exception de non-subrogation: l'influence de ses principes justificatifs sur sa mise en oeuvre","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Subrogation; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.005305410966912002,"score_gpt":0.2089813696684915,"score_spread":0.2036759587015795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300086060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8275789,0.00047470952,0.0003237104,0.0062602027,0.00023996629,0.00048532413,0.0004542005,0.000020347423,0.16416264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389986,0.001047196,0.0016152096,0.00080196414,0.00028579548,0.000043436015,0.00014424509,0.00003215365,0.057031423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644375,0.00016141222,0.0005449385,0.00044142938,0.0017967473,0.0006117295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809486,0.00060441304,0.0004765439,0.0002703247,0.000004473054,0.0005493929],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000074785195,0.00033124132,0.00032928164,0.00003651612,0.00081848406,0.000077531906,0.000519719,0.00016427066,0.0001270728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020172907,0.00037016632,0.000059419617,0.00023187016,0.00024772066,0.0005860673,0.00007896343,0.00035634643,5.7933516e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005529083,0.0002375792,0.075348765,0.002006638,0.00023750482,0.000089572895,0.02460097,0.0030596843,0.08103002,0.7568334,0.0019447944,0.05405817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033770924,0.00005948389,0.61281383,0.0005260521,0.00014925511,0.0000060000466,0.028915478,0.002824587,0.049454615,0.0019003837,0.30232078,0.0006918575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13977684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4892359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.754933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010738643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007617109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300938337","doi":"10.59962/9780774817349-006","title":"Power, Discretion, and Vulnerability: Justice Wilson and Fiduciary Duty in the Corporate/Commercial Context","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Duty; Supreme court; Dissenting opinion; Obligation; Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Discretion; Corporate law; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.030448455306755984,"score_gpt":0.2320085089642229,"score_spread":0.2015600536574669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300938337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06314271,0.00034034072,0.00005282533,0.0004560379,0.00012902413,0.0009561312,0.000692368,0.000043262866,0.9341873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7041353,0.0005873991,0.00009947802,0.00014066132,0.00007742627,0.0000016910374,0.000016946178,0.000012758452,0.29492834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990019,0.000107962944,0.00015720846,0.00032227577,0.00025076364,0.00015989352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914676,0.00017422425,0.00023368403,0.00022016844,0.00013419647,0.00009094807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048693945,0.00009033833,0.00024642618,0.000020900146,0.00075895415,0.00020720017,0.0003400275,0.00031884792,0.00012283612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031958196,0.00015736972,0.000054405922,0.000011555038,0.0016295692,0.00010393658,0.00014425402,0.0005111281,0.0000010142207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013736074,0.0002635615,0.0031964094,0.00046213216,0.0001615267,0.00029601288,0.051051583,8.8831325e-7,0.000035582845,0.6233985,0.04015632,0.28084013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004972012,0.00003894764,0.016799528,0.00016275432,0.00014547084,0.0000109066505,0.0028584448,0.000005523751,4.1238135e-7,0.012986361,0.9662273,0.00026714284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35650912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82014334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.926071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003515613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012541735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64777595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301190396","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 2004-2005 Term","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Adjudication; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Deference; Original jurisdiction; Standard of review; Certiorari; Administrative law","score_opus":0.04913859041513848,"score_gpt":0.30516102541321505,"score_spread":0.2560224349980766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301190396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8368107,0.00008962255,0.000018053184,0.00930348,0.000046811114,0.0003305375,0.00002770669,0.000037850656,0.15333523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98590875,0.000040568695,0.0010537982,0.00032086892,0.00008481295,0.0000014299335,0.000008819482,0.000007959478,0.01257298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852115,0.00020612238,0.00016541431,0.0002765165,0.0004253718,0.00040544092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992198,0.000116590614,0.00014198359,0.00027202631,0.00008358876,0.00016605644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093300245,0.00012205281,0.00016194857,0.00008371442,0.0013231013,0.000044851226,0.0007597682,0.00015008953,0.0005615181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004973281,0.00012420943,0.00009095675,0.000389267,0.0005852944,0.0007274029,0.00017539039,0.00034533936,0.00030967768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022270171,0.00064136233,0.291411,0.000024416091,0.00011793584,0.00003533468,0.09645449,0.000082936895,0.0020735075,0.5953099,0.0017144984,0.011911893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062792137,0.000017541148,0.37612963,0.000029947694,0.000018118648,0.0000015050412,0.007998959,0.000004553738,0.00041410825,0.00060471153,0.6139492,0.00020381708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013278722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085477464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6122347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035809173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034417867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301535346","doi":"","title":"Vie privée et droits fondamentaux. Étude de la protection de la vie privée en droit constitutionnel canadien et américain et en droit international (A.-R.Nadeau).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.013843278216526861,"score_gpt":0.29530969763691384,"score_spread":0.28146641942038697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301535346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5908899,0.00050894107,0.041567855,0.045838892,0.00072355673,0.0020958148,0.00040785776,0.0003170206,0.31765017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808753,0.003661025,0.0042687566,0.0019680036,0.0010213427,0.00059880357,0.00012701433,0.0000759626,0.0074037896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948149,0.0018407096,0.0007477881,0.0008356722,0.0006052774,0.0011556629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972278,0.0009588171,0.0004543969,0.00051467394,0.00017624632,0.00066809583],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004798869,0.00038266883,0.00048589212,0.00023908375,0.00066160865,0.00054037763,0.0010837995,0.0007421138,0.00030879187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000999789,0.000588824,0.00031555956,0.00086018484,0.0009645692,0.000841681,0.0002808322,0.0013955516,0.00021579287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003863713,0.00055011414,0.011936503,0.000093909686,0.00016588454,0.00018538065,0.011773226,0.0023857174,0.0012219489,0.96370447,0.0007128983,0.0072312932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015944064,0.00015752287,0.041156135,0.0006406085,0.00021377066,0.0013833102,0.0027919544,0.007896952,0.00035132008,0.24291563,0.699851,0.0010474094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035511274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048485328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72078884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059541436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002395861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301624333","doi":"","title":"The Uncertain Scope of Malicious Prosecution: Insights from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Scope (computer science); Dismissal; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Law and economics; Malice; Economics; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.008767333308426961,"score_gpt":0.25566844088211654,"score_spread":0.24690110757368958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301624333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505912,0.00809697,0.0017836952,0.029563887,0.000298225,0.00025728185,0.000017932409,0.000013815929,0.009376958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963696,0.006706274,0.000011382469,0.000065403976,0.00035798975,0.0000061541136,6.6446523e-7,0.0000046801433,0.0032104785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986017,0.00010258909,0.00016546484,0.000084626496,0.00030699826,0.0007386217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946433,0.000119141645,0.00012739345,0.00012345256,0.00010137184,0.000064324566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005233545,0.000051938518,0.00006575531,0.000010796469,0.0008615494,0.000033524826,0.0003513599,0.00003060929,0.000019820132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082517596,0.000026911433,0.000035103512,0.00011576517,0.00013600587,0.00006447827,0.000021419723,0.0002683127,0.0000056709964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011523462,0.000010528573,0.00056854397,3.185993e-7,0.00003509829,5.307411e-7,0.0002809274,0.0000028039833,0.0011124122,0.979528,0.00060606544,0.017843222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033654488,0.00005859276,0.0019144197,0.000024031218,0.000014733218,0.0000062291556,0.0051040333,0.0000024833384,0.00084632344,0.48989475,0.5016843,0.000113537135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7146177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50107825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000998172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010924783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302041313","doi":"","title":"Compound Interest and Gain-Based Damages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Supreme court; Breach of contract; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.03780142515198675,"score_gpt":0.2989679303668986,"score_spread":0.26116650521491186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302041313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8766379,0.0043776846,0.005796754,0.044214122,0.00014601916,0.00022260897,0.000004224569,0.00008641158,0.06851428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939209,0.0019469605,0.00006313205,0.00021334137,0.00023851843,0.0000025585596,5.481813e-7,0.000006388448,0.0036076545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998703,0.00007279584,0.00010813575,0.00009584022,0.00012813637,0.0008920659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996722,0.00006266273,0.000058778798,0.00007424467,0.000038383212,0.000093747614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073260174,0.000058815767,0.00006887237,0.000038286962,0.000692548,0.00013527498,0.00018234803,0.000036785743,0.00014177896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042159463,0.000052738724,0.000036283272,0.00010707003,0.00014770069,0.000104913815,0.000016137928,0.0006457181,0.000041027888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003046934,0.000051042072,0.0012629936,0.0000013836425,0.00001775253,0.0000016301416,0.0007317031,0.000008773328,0.000105812556,0.97932637,0.00056122086,0.017928304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001046605,0.00022639493,0.0014216759,0.000028210814,0.00004186978,0.00008354315,0.011947415,0.0015762269,0.00007528129,0.31325027,0.66993237,0.00037016487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033920372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008919101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6693711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000284226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003435341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53265893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303229060","doi":"","title":"Workshop Presentations: Directors' and Officers' Liability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Corporation; Liability; Proposition; Third party; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Internet privacy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018355928079763693,"score_gpt":0.32534435874398565,"score_spread":0.30698843066422193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303229060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9053628,0.0027254545,0.005746525,0.01791968,0.00016068766,0.0002970001,0.0000018509644,0.00008192648,0.06770412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805802,0.010030594,0.00007334942,0.0000636203,0.0004134827,0.000009463241,0.0000010406018,0.000006361371,0.008821874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983837,0.00011881171,0.00014666328,0.00013728336,0.00020145564,0.0010120971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950534,0.00013751588,0.00006742699,0.00010118247,0.00007260874,0.00011593626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014073512,0.00006379922,0.000077095814,0.000036474026,0.0008605481,0.00012352219,0.00017242925,0.000051922783,0.00009337667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021385642,0.00005813633,0.00004659637,0.00025576568,0.00014259206,0.00024629282,0.000025558158,0.00066133786,0.000020046973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012039989,0.00005955638,0.025228864,0.0000010406387,0.000027267928,6.150193e-7,0.0015742572,0.000012162513,0.000020074602,0.94310266,0.00023092092,0.029730545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036258428,0.000041637806,0.0154372575,0.000007539933,0.000032959953,0.00004558986,0.022185981,0.000046501256,0.000007422945,0.34726483,0.614381,0.0001866827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012637174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017448464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6141501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003310965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013690279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97366524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303810331","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000021","title":"THE FAILURE OF UNIVERSAL THEORIES OF TORT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Punitive damages; Law; Jurisdiction; Damages; Delict; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Private law; Comparative law; Sociology; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.017933053862165878,"score_gpt":0.29056900884041814,"score_spread":0.27263595497825227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303810331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03779885,0.0001884992,0.00047145496,0.0029554078,0.00013113605,0.00013710577,0.000014445865,0.000028184988,0.9582749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99389184,0.000011952135,0.00010165528,0.000051952873,0.000093320785,0.0000031147983,7.210734e-7,0.000003499256,0.00584197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993785,0.00015913624,0.00010429399,0.00006144093,0.00018860608,0.000108005836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935365,0.00023536893,0.00007192339,0.00017078224,0.00011607709,0.000052181276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010068128,0.000038351718,0.000070515656,0.000008214862,0.00022968368,0.00002234645,0.00029529326,0.00003643119,0.00003032874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011347474,0.000025690137,0.00004315063,0.000114455,0.0009969494,0.00012752546,0.00004837116,0.000061134866,0.000008983098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021625998,0.000012783045,0.0000599603,0.0000014884387,0.000008465339,2.163574e-7,0.004608361,0.0000047038416,0.000095002535,0.9942243,0.0003885352,0.0005745507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006267147,0.000013832914,0.000030254416,0.0000032756384,0.0000059018357,1.137134e-7,0.015449213,0.0000012487812,0.0007120119,0.38519984,0.5984942,0.00002746077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024072826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002383799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95609295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023391898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017196391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36733016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304059494","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511779213.002","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0220966383001875,"score_gpt":0.2297745826476385,"score_spread":0.20767794434745102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304059494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000425353,0.000018509818,0.00018088924,0.0006902525,0.00041523454,0.00029368748,0.000089640715,0.00015239562,0.99811685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006246239,0.00009722169,0.00013773364,0.000041629377,0.0020719785,6.4164203e-7,0.000029798064,0.000019059024,0.9969773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991416,0.000023037312,0.00009237323,0.00032667603,0.00022589602,0.00019045435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991749,0.00002846118,0.00012662662,0.000373276,0.00014597991,0.00015075269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013260343,0.00014480029,0.00015327893,0.00006951853,0.00071458024,0.00005801352,0.00040285735,0.0003972979,0.00005575659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013779207,0.00018097366,0.00011930525,0.0000068276227,0.00047622633,0.00008065973,0.00014311635,0.0005515143,0.00008991848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064406054,0.0000036617798,2.3423307e-7,0.0000059230456,0.000017847451,0.0000074789345,0.00012697023,1.7158116e-7,0.00007816217,0.94495904,0.05380956,0.0009844819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008713854,0.000006233266,0.0000035484034,0.0000085213,0.00006409618,0.0000010164285,0.000066367575,0.0000012509332,0.00011031214,0.00006744692,0.9993877,0.0001964101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012211767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011698883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015651349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017749699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7379892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2304873221","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1490","title":"Symposium: It's All in the Game: A Nonfoundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication, by Allan Hutchinson","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Jurisprudence; Law; Foundationalism; Reputation; Political science; Philosophy of law; Common law; Tort; Wright; Comparative law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; History; Art history; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027790409522209555,"score_gpt":0.32649187793486717,"score_spread":0.2987014684126576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2304873221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024185544,0.00025541201,0.00005798232,0.05205511,0.000035404806,0.0002010846,0.000028764804,0.000011193516,0.9231695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994464,0.0011209177,0.00017218148,0.0035785655,0.00017245422,0.000014557671,0.000016452184,0.0000067492574,0.0004541365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987843,0.00016509343,0.00030091897,0.00013249514,0.00042035765,0.00019681762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943,0.00010955446,0.00014247048,0.00014749341,0.00008109083,0.00008936081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096688303,0.000080508195,0.00011162343,0.000018134824,0.00060564524,0.00025943326,0.0003806317,0.00006235426,0.00054539007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013486444,0.00006177232,0.000042964122,0.00011457164,0.00032886816,0.0003021408,0.00001666188,0.00022356653,0.000023015644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007082111,0.00009374531,0.00024234044,0.000003231866,0.00001135099,0.0000011372746,0.0058107106,0.00003159601,0.00020470413,0.99067694,0.0021797856,0.0007373639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002980847,0.000020781203,0.0011093756,0.00002052004,0.000017113602,0.000022017573,0.0007189801,0.000046476787,0.000026663232,0.052245695,0.94538105,0.000093268616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11027732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23587446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97027844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057922687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007597539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8956474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305326407","doi":"","title":"The Deed Not the Motive: Fiduciary Law Without Loyalty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Loyalty; Law; Deed; Principal (computer security); Duty of care; Commercial law; Law and economics; Business; Corporate law; Trust law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.013200093831946352,"score_gpt":0.2979046797508274,"score_spread":0.28470458591888104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305326407","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26837686,0.0038780312,0.01481273,0.516801,0.0008826176,0.0009971508,0.00001512416,0.000177199,0.19405931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795993,0.0033558055,0.000012438221,0.0005058622,0.00075374264,0.000013319592,1.5678049e-7,0.000009847408,0.015749544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976617,0.0002389522,0.0001658451,0.00012264059,0.00034158587,0.001469266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919033,0.0003079905,0.00012295043,0.00020791519,0.00009384179,0.00007696217],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034530056,0.00008058047,0.00007362417,0.000010513457,0.0035124805,0.00015835301,0.0006856847,0.000047031455,0.000036286205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013877667,0.00003260785,0.00009304667,0.00012339784,0.00046020016,0.00016529423,0.000047782698,0.0007488193,0.000114465016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010645571,0.000010924053,0.00044057867,1.5579904e-7,0.00002845079,1.6058043e-7,0.00048169566,8.390945e-7,0.00014696877,0.9791962,0.00026492786,0.019418487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022808138,0.000034738863,0.00128026,0.0000069684534,0.000017272721,0.000015810927,0.0030947183,0.000004895499,0.000108452514,0.45664454,0.53847694,0.00008733234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013239655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043059416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7112224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005528466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016775782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309628782","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1084","title":"Book Notes: Electronic Consumer Contracts in the Conflict of Laws, by Zheng Sophia Tang","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04994684942052247,"score_gpt":0.3033877134124054,"score_spread":0.2534408639918829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309628782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011073498,0.013627421,0.0004551539,0.0057517886,0.00011030049,0.00043252343,0.00002353547,0.00002671708,0.96849906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996254,0.0015496962,0.000098871875,0.0017051522,0.00011038415,0.000011535119,0.0000014464798,0.000009006122,0.00025990704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862754,0.00021860689,0.00030530794,0.00011656005,0.00031366543,0.0004183035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992333,0.00020660073,0.00021199958,0.00015711947,0.00008901525,0.00010193363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011426688,0.000092087634,0.00015510654,0.000023622855,0.0005595063,0.00007792746,0.000466997,0.000084685526,0.0005430151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006578135,0.0000677811,0.00008068071,0.000116130635,0.00031469233,0.0002574987,0.000019804069,0.00047031115,0.000030011746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012192968,0.00011090565,0.00040565117,0.000002131799,0.00002153215,0.0000052575824,0.0055491705,0.0000015488226,0.0005033553,0.9905046,0.0024546944,0.00042895804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005925912,0.000061040584,0.0009636396,0.000030155634,0.000037089547,0.000024399102,0.0016553415,0.000016032234,0.00075618044,0.034237165,0.961471,0.00015532381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05509555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09753735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9851805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006926993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017563309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9511967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310202944","doi":"","title":"A Common Law Tort of Privacy? The Challenges of Developing a Human Rights Tort","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Common law; Law; Jurisdiction; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Privacy laws of the United States; Information privacy law; Privacy law; Data Protection Act 1998; Information privacy; Human rights; Business; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.23338685154788982,"score_gpt":0.4036198964505998,"score_spread":0.17023304490271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310202944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.794269,0.0005776584,0.00017982886,0.007315582,0.000031966494,0.00051887945,0.00002321066,0.000027426864,0.19705644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809563,0.000081198836,0.00057398964,0.0000069326243,0.00003644742,0.000001159325,0.0000031800644,0.0000054104817,0.0011960341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979401,0.00040084354,0.00018457042,0.00020261078,0.0009913112,0.0002805595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998215,0.00018919264,0.00019247696,0.00043113873,0.0008133291,0.00015883261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232258,0.00007093347,0.00025038508,0.00010657261,0.0011042941,0.00001511138,0.0011793142,0.00008931566,0.000026130734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000772007,0.000070552494,0.00009011625,0.0004427789,0.0019467626,0.00020766571,0.0004164467,0.00021179674,0.000012575658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003088831,0.00011992375,0.00059668574,0.00004663803,0.000029381403,0.000006120925,0.019739443,0.000001809428,0.00016395366,0.97452414,0.0037008664,0.00104013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000521055,0.0001548125,0.010038644,0.000110581976,0.00002276301,0.0000015608348,0.04032433,0.000025718806,0.00038562433,0.04254669,0.9057049,0.00016332812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13316636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10976048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93197745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027206453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005102356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90648407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312918544","doi":"10.1017/s0008197315000112","title":"GOOD FAITH PERFORMANCE IN CANADIAN CONTRACT LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Faith; Honesty; Good faith; Obligation; Fair dealing; Bad faith; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Commonwealth; Political science; Corporation; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Theology; History","score_opus":0.0343651089007624,"score_gpt":0.29227942069292556,"score_spread":0.2579143117921632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312918544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25435895,0.00011579419,0.000006238992,0.015138106,0.00017923732,0.00011273803,0.000008457296,0.000011109799,0.73006934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693376,0.000048077196,0.00002563555,0.0015635331,0.0005331492,0.0000056198583,0.0000010370688,0.000006235462,0.00088295894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899757,0.000112649745,0.00015360067,0.000071878734,0.00024348321,0.0004207934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919885,0.000037425965,0.00006231214,0.00012570489,0.00008485965,0.0004908221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016136031,0.000060453225,0.0000843194,0.000022244023,0.0011119734,0.00020167459,0.00037939058,0.00004350234,0.000028871682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026102458,0.00004227113,0.0000330026,0.00014941924,0.00022808921,0.00028321493,0.000017795926,0.00034631573,0.00010924003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004247335,0.000010690098,0.003618392,5.733648e-7,0.000004006158,0.000008590097,0.001523576,0.000049655344,0.0000039442707,0.99293566,0.0012560332,0.00058462325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024700674,0.000016657028,0.010895088,0.000009887015,0.0000054416178,0.00003397701,0.001107094,0.00013856417,0.000019529609,0.00061702053,0.9868332,0.00007651992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8518094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9644299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99231863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003679553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006555825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85525125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314348269","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007055","title":"Gerry Johnstone, Restorative Justice. Ideas, Values and Debates.Cullompton, UK, Willan Publishing, 2002, 190 pages.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Restorative justice; Criminology; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027860018777105783,"score_gpt":0.2719274624969068,"score_spread":0.24406744371980102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314348269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63430274,0.019137396,0.000095675154,0.05205193,0.001294752,0.00060040207,0.00033049865,0.000048868143,0.29213774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837887,0.0045763114,0.0003874705,0.004570367,0.0007863015,0.0000082403485,0.000008478513,0.000028470982,0.0058456296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805945,0.0001618917,0.00047673477,0.00030874,0.00019479668,0.00079840125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964563,0.00025608437,0.00038173795,0.00020672707,0.0004874247,0.0022116743],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001440834,0.00021818462,0.0004053805,0.00008068406,0.0019790544,0.00076227373,0.00041096008,0.00028898186,0.00029862844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004635567,0.00023303495,0.00021610902,0.00030915195,0.0011046164,0.0009808587,0.000032664044,0.000692968,0.000004498512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033486108,0.00002026534,0.0005293404,0.000060300827,0.00015009443,0.0000949104,0.13612092,0.000016086375,0.000022121778,0.7628402,0.09739249,0.0027498917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007336233,0.00012359204,0.0027579092,0.00014687711,0.00025409588,0.00014133709,0.06040746,0.00021597586,0.0000036763613,0.026250454,0.90844226,0.0005227252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1861731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7344969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81104976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080763333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000856628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315208986","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.619","title":"R. Brownsword /N.J. Hird /G. Howells (eds.), Good Faith in Contract - Concept and Context, Aldershot, Dartmouth - Ashgate , 1999, pp. 326.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Faith; Good faith; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01965605918304419,"score_gpt":0.2897990723030501,"score_spread":0.2701430131200059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315208986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009152128,0.4178076,0.000019309544,0.018694976,0.000119334945,0.0030474276,0.00017371797,0.00020050835,0.550785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6505436,0.33654776,0.00013397181,0.008502822,0.00014157603,0.000076460215,0.000035745306,0.000023024111,0.0039950614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981376,0.00017386349,0.0005095811,0.00036471363,0.00031345326,0.00050082174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990517,0.00014328615,0.00015087241,0.00033770426,0.000056457757,0.00025999162],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007924641,0.00021619054,0.00049919926,0.000019833966,0.0004438983,0.00013786662,0.00035946709,0.00011370288,0.0022072685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048467482,0.00018405807,0.000114405026,0.00037524436,0.0005064145,0.0004417396,0.000040582534,0.0002677696,0.00025475727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008919572,0.000101255086,0.00021363088,0.00021695979,0.000023264753,0.000011883823,0.0019101856,0.0000024311369,0.00000680765,0.6934237,0.0067583444,0.29732263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045608057,0.000029559957,0.00031396214,0.0008265171,0.000044830304,0.0000041892013,0.00019100195,0.000012948678,0.000012230688,0.00074014225,0.9971168,0.00025172674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025188033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02038102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008312551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014356045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317693644","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal governance in Supreme Court of Canada cases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kansai Daigaku hōgaku ronshū","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.011798550717944657,"score_gpt":0.29585642235000337,"score_spread":0.2840578716320587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317693644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9197043,0.00007828476,0.000016764132,0.006790965,0.00039906995,0.00023014125,0.000172126,0.000028003775,0.072580345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961377,0.00006933178,0.00043692088,0.0001550252,0.0001936423,0.000028026903,0.0000058969645,0.000010363737,0.0029631308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985936,0.0000488494,0.0002694978,0.00022692044,0.00046373912,0.00039734997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911755,0.00018978347,0.00012449989,0.00031201378,0.00009584712,0.00016031945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004058875,0.000109680805,0.00017728469,0.000025970156,0.00027052686,0.000030783795,0.00043876577,0.000087160945,0.0006497059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015037284,0.00011201949,0.000042860647,0.00035000982,0.00024415494,0.00016576513,0.000020727854,0.00031543034,0.000013105524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020610074,0.00017389136,0.11081176,0.000023398905,0.000013941338,0.00004854374,0.0033976703,0.000080290105,0.0023056464,0.855979,0.025594188,0.0015510397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021127122,0.000011582791,0.08927263,0.000016042271,0.0000072217117,0.0000035222567,0.0006528511,0.0000548067,0.0006255094,0.0009178121,0.908065,0.00016172872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88161695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88247085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017362932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021800783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7113824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317953680","doi":"","title":"Economic Interests in Canadian Tort Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Tort; Fiduciary; Law; Context (archaeology); Economic analysis; Duty; Delict; Liability; Cause of action; Law and economics; Common law; Economic law; Contributory negligence; Political science; Economics; Private law; Plaintiff; Comparative law; Black letter law; History","score_opus":0.009329313571650273,"score_gpt":0.29865588579407515,"score_spread":0.28932657222242486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317953680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63870025,0.0005005109,0.000051547788,0.03386652,0.00016071602,0.00014558439,0.0000026043963,0.00002129713,0.326551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715906,0.0005711483,0.000011051859,0.0004772876,0.0003043218,0.0000015833333,7.61971e-7,0.000003524117,0.0014712681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981447,0.000035807145,0.00012909656,0.00008723466,0.00006599192,0.0015371585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968636,0.000010125946,0.000036425605,0.00006870441,0.00001287607,0.0001854944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009548677,0.00004827301,0.00006407027,0.000060713443,0.0003385528,0.00007824911,0.0002448069,0.000045612738,0.0000721444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012371781,0.00004908549,0.00003735178,0.000069562055,0.000038982533,0.0001665868,0.0000051312445,0.00061065087,0.00009187441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001647446,0.0000072214702,0.0012993332,7.693974e-8,0.0000032670466,0.0000011322123,0.00041124978,0.000012621269,0.0000052501905,0.99245805,0.00008546698,0.005714706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016578069,0.000047713955,0.005170272,0.000005069989,0.0000030496785,0.00001747813,0.0016110609,0.000018715962,0.0000055016076,0.48567462,0.50717974,0.000101016194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70645595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50709426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039302567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063669733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318102869","doi":"10.1093/tandt/tts117","title":"Recent developments in Canada in the areas of trusts and estates law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Law; Certainty; Government (linguistics); Administration (probate law); Trust law; Jurisdiction; Probate; Political science; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.027393548101161333,"score_gpt":0.2891953846663348,"score_spread":0.2618018365651735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318102869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9377561,0.000514177,4.8487175e-7,0.0016893438,0.00006853371,0.00024814485,0.000007174092,0.000006222647,0.059709817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988649,0.0005118176,0.00011352499,0.00031232453,0.000035066074,0.000035461184,0.000003198168,0.0000050010076,0.00011870553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998953,0.00012273519,0.00022617033,0.00011036217,0.00026552804,0.00032223362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954736,0.00016648663,0.00006490823,0.00011698801,0.00002589406,0.0000783686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005659697,0.00007896897,0.0001275401,0.000033050448,0.00013594286,0.000023139884,0.00021548956,0.00003691958,0.00006763635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005482352,0.00005943578,0.000011422242,0.0002556723,0.0001197574,0.00016123505,0.000037426027,0.00010239657,0.0000031567567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010932746,0.00009899027,0.7159999,0.000014650648,0.0000071587174,0.0000025291304,0.033129133,0.000011539461,0.000009633762,0.21607344,0.00032508187,0.03431699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022365704,0.000004332139,0.69735116,0.000019012195,0.0000047515296,9.838382e-7,0.011870167,0.000006315827,0.00010281562,0.00079989363,0.2895164,0.000100495636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8603624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2891913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022758626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048829766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24237208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320688161","doi":"10.5623/cig2014-002","title":"The Duty to Consult and Accommodate Aboriginal Peoples: A Primer for Ontario Surveyors Working in Resources Development","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GEOMATICA","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Government (linguistics); Natural resource; Treaty; Law; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.023228090853458592,"score_gpt":0.31221181315309976,"score_spread":0.28898372229964114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320688161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98487025,0.000019333887,0.0010365816,0.004030992,0.000040901283,0.00048597908,0.0000013494846,0.000020767113,0.009493827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921284,0.0000077981085,0.0061318893,0.00016000951,0.000046393216,0.00016430403,0.000002068017,0.000004783196,0.0013543785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921274,0.000077109806,0.00017841539,0.00013884163,0.0001400645,0.0002528376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989,0.0008069902,0.000047459846,0.00012660607,0.00003551499,0.000083441184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014428758,0.000061860075,0.00009392725,0.00002338971,0.00080807,0.00016543826,0.00020102,0.00003115651,0.0000138762825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022470046,0.000045298602,0.0000141948685,0.00013553193,0.00008721979,0.000038119124,0.000043435346,0.000061240724,0.000017738279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056915225,0.00008314536,0.30462313,0.000026476328,0.000032642754,3.6381311e-7,0.3201033,0.00003246422,0.000033959008,0.31213093,0.0013338091,0.061542906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011581794,0.0000062155327,0.19954143,0.00002253319,0.0000029886207,1.1596092e-7,0.0017465168,0.00003439631,0.000010529509,0.001061878,0.7973904,0.00006716816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02859214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7901724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7960566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008594034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027678924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97787654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321524221","doi":"10.1093/tandt/tts097","title":"Residence of a Trust: Fundy Settlement v Canada 2012 SCC 14","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Settlement (finance); Convention; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Demography; Finance; Payment","score_opus":0.029273117073587568,"score_gpt":0.3080845223451236,"score_spread":0.27881140527153603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321524221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79329807,0.0021027604,0.00010950452,0.008580119,0.00088854204,0.00080831215,0.0002286252,0.00011196277,0.19387208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872655,0.00008665808,0.00045137265,0.00027118085,0.0004344756,0.000044762834,0.000008446116,0.00001351762,0.011424052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812764,0.00011448187,0.00033008924,0.0001896885,0.00063730136,0.0006007823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989427,0.00014335483,0.00016695008,0.00034317788,0.00010685322,0.00029696102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006595389,0.00013440046,0.00020319065,0.0000454898,0.00042035,0.000035445562,0.00041263815,0.00007848744,0.0019095313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011281546,0.00012532921,0.000063045125,0.00026139806,0.00019949437,0.0004126365,0.000085455584,0.00013420312,0.000059789832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043492775,0.00033347413,0.17847472,0.00009331133,0.000083319166,0.000004404684,0.02447853,0.00006071494,0.0005177256,0.67169696,0.108664,0.0155493235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023086433,0.000018221937,0.08359995,0.000027041458,0.000038333932,0.0000010026058,0.004932503,0.000011853463,0.00087425736,0.00071906607,0.9093218,0.00022509563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4959325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6967205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8006578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024116146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073616713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322455497","doi":"10.2307/3504948","title":"10.2307/3504948","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Liability; Criminal liability; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Criminal law; Political science; Politics; Social science; Public law","score_opus":0.011078781760355644,"score_gpt":0.24298436823929986,"score_spread":0.23190558647894421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322455497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010620852,0.0000115406165,8.386248e-7,0.0031169753,0.0000011475717,0.00012631546,0.0000069212574,0.00009280021,0.9955814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037639071,6.261952e-7,0.00008731183,0.00011627347,0.00018005907,0.00001907427,0.0000028004458,0.0000052380155,0.9958247],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999507,0.000024058705,0.00006723361,0.00010578286,0.00013063315,0.00016530353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996933,0.000025737905,0.000010062185,0.00012961827,0.000022436525,0.00011889779],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012945819,0.00004020135,0.000050461076,0.000014802061,0.00027037042,0.000049804607,0.00018353722,0.000030054727,0.9925922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020791571,0.000039785755,0.000026999944,0.00018552589,0.000044561843,0.00006487198,0.000016138005,0.000037680435,0.98521966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060226807,0.000033376586,4.294357e-7,6.723823e-7,0.0000034759953,6.191971e-7,0.0002968825,0.000024736757,0.000019564173,0.0013163234,0.18860373,0.8096942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035078778,0.000011294313,0.00004394773,0.000001759319,0.0000029739335,1.4703654e-7,0.0000071155177,0.0000142906465,0.0000068241616,0.000060571892,0.9997555,0.00006048038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062111206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007717258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8111518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027848228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043462143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20794982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322706132","doi":"10.1086/682556","title":": <i>Thomas Browne</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"History; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05983394968148842,"score_gpt":0.33162072634653983,"score_spread":0.2717867766650514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322706132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057538293,0.00048267396,0.002234808,0.013066038,0.0003737446,0.0002805067,0.000008508317,0.0003177454,0.9256977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99112344,0.000008362542,0.000705942,0.00029514727,0.00047484078,0.000031540047,0.0000026555404,0.000008633275,0.007349426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990906,0.000067547095,0.00012563648,0.0001720217,0.0002798302,0.000264325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934936,0.00003126929,0.00005109862,0.00022558366,0.00008966561,0.00025300166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003592002,0.000068592795,0.00008932909,0.000021304018,0.00027674675,0.00009155097,0.0002500107,0.00005536523,0.000046704048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003377394,0.00006482231,0.00004185329,0.00023642185,0.00017096475,0.0002321999,0.000007678647,0.00008323919,0.00049827655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011848744,0.00009731898,0.0021546786,0.0000054778534,0.00000947718,0.000006759226,0.036498133,0.0000059483264,0.00036678227,0.7775342,0.14038499,0.042924393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015996207,0.000063396714,0.00047374022,0.000006607131,0.000003822234,9.0806043e-7,0.0038814151,0.000018839497,0.00004285278,0.010295632,0.9849466,0.00010621964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013479876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012704111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93358517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005999408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001770848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64045036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323832375","doi":"10.1142/9789812778857_0006","title":"LOGARITHMIC FUNCTIONAL AND THE WEIL RECIPROCITY LAW","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Reciprocity law; Logarithm; Mathematical economics; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematical analysis; Pure mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.026275499484584377,"score_gpt":0.3013622496571425,"score_spread":0.2750867501725581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323832375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024222292,0.00003505725,0.0057054935,0.01642158,0.000063058906,0.00014330924,9.684794e-7,0.000041536372,0.9533667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98509526,0.000018226123,0.0003590742,0.00165012,0.00020614723,0.000006594142,6.205819e-7,0.0000013912631,0.012662536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963546,0.000022080132,0.000058512484,0.00006991562,0.0001141416,0.00009988873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969184,0.00016660613,0.000015110195,0.00005634029,0.000029768355,0.00004035408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009476585,0.000023835604,0.000031731674,0.000005259918,0.0006917288,0.00004137916,0.00006183122,0.000027384169,0.00024583706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028950455,0.000014326358,0.000017544344,0.00007350192,0.00048797464,0.000056861023,0.000024525387,0.000058607544,0.00004244091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006885426,0.0000056871895,0.00020893736,2.8245972e-7,0.0000018617981,7.007822e-8,0.00058149884,2.7303307e-7,0.000008598382,0.99657106,0.0008075094,0.001807361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023556405,0.0000021869198,0.0067172428,5.512348e-7,0.0000032804478,4.795241e-7,0.0011861973,0.000017743652,0.000031793134,0.050867837,0.9409038,0.0000333184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007714632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020335304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001940284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025224457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331299321","doi":"10.1093/lpr/mgt008","title":"Incommensurability, proportionality, and defeasibility","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Probability and Risk","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028058117910048756,"score_gpt":0.29236658936569543,"score_spread":0.2643084714556467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331299321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556726,0.00006603725,0.00005516,0.0073841447,0.000027349754,0.0010179701,0.000025388104,0.0000784328,0.035672925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748707,0.00015360181,0.0017702824,0.00019984969,0.00005809334,0.00012108133,0.000003365563,0.000003846856,0.00020278832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869436,0.00030918952,0.00023451544,0.00036085828,0.00018830148,0.00021279302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911326,0.00020262432,0.00007466046,0.000274621,0.00014005066,0.00019479424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015021818,0.00008859243,0.00013179335,0.000008160782,0.0010697476,0.00014969074,0.000108922766,0.00009451684,0.0002175524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002590528,0.00007081319,0.000036432633,0.00010161826,0.0014678104,0.00031033676,0.00014400181,0.00016481294,0.000021869218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000197911,0.000084246356,0.4218767,0.000021013657,0.000004635476,3.7306908e-8,0.0007946229,5.269475e-7,0.0000044233243,0.5743658,0.000059067006,0.0027869488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007892155,0.000012904976,0.41238752,0.0000023935004,0.00000851051,4.3046555e-7,0.00019050791,0.000022877482,0.0000076219394,0.5564548,0.03076153,0.00007201578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0536444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036733177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0418145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050310515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056933368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9808439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336534342","doi":"10.22145/flr.42.1.9","title":"Realising the Public Potential of Corporate Law: Twenty Years of Civil Penalty Enforcement in Australia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Fiduciary; Public law; Corporate law; Private law; Commercial law; Corporate governance; Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Enforcement; Corporate group; Municipal law; Administrative law; Political science; Comparative law; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.0817171552472051,"score_gpt":0.3426131843189589,"score_spread":0.2608960290717538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336534342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2187892,0.010787848,0.0009757803,0.042278703,0.00079901156,0.0050675813,0.00014264436,0.00010540891,0.72105384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741507,0.0014317184,0.00006739132,0.000626847,0.000060999148,0.000025963769,0.000010707986,0.0000040884743,0.00035723962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988131,0.00024961794,0.00036574906,0.00011664941,0.00027687295,0.00017800179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929035,0.0000388144,0.00033182686,0.00020983079,0.00007567687,0.000053483378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001386472,0.00006052406,0.00021114844,0.000009871193,0.00019350022,0.000051093248,0.00026813438,0.00003278033,0.000354138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051029758,0.00004548231,0.0000900304,0.00018001802,0.00024903833,0.00011799723,0.000056930105,0.00008703427,0.000017088609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011185185,0.000023083263,0.00012839628,0.00015615442,0.0000047961857,2.6505612e-7,0.00009881256,0.0000071078757,0.000032450593,0.99752384,0.0007595273,0.00126444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001332926,0.00002050324,0.0016058641,0.0005389989,0.000021397513,5.632696e-7,0.00004122087,0.000023418466,0.000037609036,0.0116897365,0.98580354,0.000083865605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040360905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03700749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003297587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005239051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336886427","doi":"","title":"Mitigation, Specific Performance and the Property Developer: A Case Comment on Southcott Estates Inc. v. Toronto Catholic District School Board","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Law; Obligation; Profit (economics); Business; Rubric; Breach of contract; Political science; Damages; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01038550864635759,"score_gpt":0.2465884697626824,"score_spread":0.2362029611163248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336886427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531962,0.0013745172,0.00019700675,0.0365928,0.00006291043,0.0006755926,0.0000037869563,0.000031157928,0.007866012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847734,0.011907478,0.0000826871,0.000721669,0.00026070673,0.00009639141,0.0000027125527,0.000010715154,0.0021442254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817973,0.00017749376,0.0002400467,0.00016071576,0.0002644516,0.0009775525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993495,0.00007584987,0.000118134114,0.00015393575,0.00014448052,0.00015814477],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001372574,0.00012047033,0.00012106566,0.000020226598,0.001934658,0.00034939288,0.0002537899,0.00004582526,0.0001163047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006174002,0.00006374236,0.00004077337,0.000117485,0.0002619973,0.00040336573,0.00004451915,0.000708936,0.000111513655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011808324,0.0002294608,0.009714685,0.000017038501,0.00014788413,0.000013259674,0.04109748,0.0000379503,0.00005539338,0.726867,0.011808084,0.20989367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002035834,0.0002498485,0.008202908,0.00003831081,0.00004476906,0.0006926201,0.06006573,0.00045123041,0.0000366933,0.022706354,0.90502244,0.0004532296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024543371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020236619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8932144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011935928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010817742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233723973","doi":"","title":"Building Indigenous Governance from Native Title: Moving Away from 'Fitting In' to Creating a Decolonized Space","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Indigenous; Colonialism; Sovereignty; Transitional justice; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Business; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.019532823961770095,"score_gpt":0.29038575393883803,"score_spread":0.27085292997706795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233723973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658472,0.00044171364,0.005077067,0.001455237,0.00018177858,0.00057771965,0.00005127281,0.00008668687,0.12628138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97896725,0.000077331315,0.019975811,0.000108641485,0.00030438756,0.00007932556,0.000005646499,0.0000075785224,0.00047403964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999155,0.000050869403,0.00019076273,0.00024303902,0.00013353817,0.00022679589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992265,0.00038208213,0.0001042615,0.00013148233,0.00006759288,0.000088072185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015847391,0.00009046196,0.0001459875,0.000035818462,0.0005197575,0.00013643476,0.00021594531,0.00007110165,0.0004797563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005795777,0.00009613334,0.000038477516,0.00027284157,0.000118359414,0.00018846628,0.00007702986,0.00012843666,0.00038957852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031141865,0.000049331273,0.009887005,0.000006660351,0.000025006706,0.0000059962617,0.017729847,0.00039747907,0.0023542268,0.9618454,0.00024436583,0.007451566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014777721,0.000045146313,0.1116881,0.0019864375,0.00008891055,0.000003437523,0.029822255,0.004638548,0.002261859,0.045339134,0.80101573,0.0016326527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038658075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081862835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9165063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027013908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024382258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9677436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337513776","doi":"","title":"Reasonableness as Proportionality: Towards a Better Constructive Interpretation of the Law on Searching Computers in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Proportionality (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Expectation of privacy; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.008221970926062543,"score_gpt":0.2692866171906287,"score_spread":0.26106464626456616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337513776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96856546,0.000025718722,0.0020938125,0.022228267,0.00010350088,0.00015378068,0.0000065012846,0.0000032544938,0.0068197227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937993,0.000044471697,0.00003429401,0.00033696037,0.00006480819,0.00000527318,3.4417528e-7,0.000003523261,0.00013040811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864817,0.00019408936,0.00016431295,0.00009161324,0.00036833648,0.0005334756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958926,0.000092362156,0.00012753453,0.00007442441,0.00007951629,0.000036891048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009779446,0.000047621517,0.00007501837,0.000020718373,0.00023777987,0.000019300089,0.00022824845,0.00002017849,0.0000140299135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070438764,0.000027703616,0.000037493865,0.00012150951,0.00015556332,0.00011874007,0.000027040984,0.00039298725,0.0000013838121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016826176,0.000010184956,0.0064697852,0.0000012094392,0.00001717233,4.180185e-7,0.0006130879,0.000022478735,0.000052371943,0.9460482,0.000007515297,0.04674073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004957951,0.0000586997,0.01812486,0.00018178247,0.00001063914,0.00003486369,0.009690564,0.000095542775,0.00039453202,0.96761775,0.0031664167,0.0001285684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8165153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9662666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14975122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027318913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013217538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337716135","doi":"10.29173/alr434","title":"Apportionment of Damages for Contributory Negligence: The Causal Potency Criterion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Damages; Contributory negligence; Legislation; Position (finance); Law and economics; Subject matter; Law; Political science; Economics; Tort; Liability","score_opus":0.031157073183355557,"score_gpt":0.35319820348594727,"score_spread":0.32204113030259174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337716135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007193495,0.1478743,0.012276752,0.54807025,0.000915447,0.010849001,0.0002653445,0.00009782917,0.2724576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911584,0.074396774,0.00012188383,0.0031457406,0.00017089835,0.00046857414,0.000008705442,0.000009521615,0.010093902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992424,0.00008753869,0.00024885053,0.00011904392,0.00014898923,0.00015312455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990666,0.0004147211,0.00013986215,0.00023501083,0.00009546245,0.00004835622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062825467,0.000056610726,0.00014432505,0.0000041323096,0.00030283586,0.0000128345655,0.00023006398,0.000028929579,0.00026913852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028240972,0.000028827597,0.000090764275,0.00007575773,0.00021848608,0.00009932287,0.000029543902,0.000024329209,0.000038939274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011462977,0.000019464227,0.000058109094,0.00011213959,0.000007900746,5.4391624e-8,0.00017722076,3.7701216e-8,0.0002303066,0.97395986,0.0041562296,0.021277517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060383903,0.000014331976,0.00019783182,0.00047792267,0.000038947903,2.3762048e-7,0.000029775058,5.3162256e-7,0.00011027012,0.00240396,0.9966147,0.000051086707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006561557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037971258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99245846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003072357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071421404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338070778","doi":"","title":"Injunctions Contra Mundum: The Ultimate Weapon in Containment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Tort; Law; Criticism; Order (exchange); Political science; Business; Liability","score_opus":0.00877383288797661,"score_gpt":0.2811958971766334,"score_spread":0.2724220642886568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338070778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6154534,0.0017133151,0.048185367,0.12482092,0.00082460314,0.001175087,0.0000059650743,0.0001349951,0.2076863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559695,0.0012579379,0.000025668356,0.00032200955,0.00033894583,0.000022580634,7.0751565e-7,0.0000065676095,0.0024286222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980767,0.00022227202,0.0001880269,0.00010122972,0.00022277253,0.0011890494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995686,0.00011471411,0.00008886634,0.000121720324,0.00004336011,0.000062768595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032702344,0.00006757508,0.00008836343,0.000037269583,0.0009273004,0.000101319565,0.00029614518,0.000045111974,0.00006010119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107423664,0.000047174464,0.00005903746,0.00018195913,0.000111613735,0.00012301528,0.000020304253,0.0009826025,0.0000519538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067471033,0.000033112436,0.0010153294,3.3149638e-7,0.000012969794,1.3576795e-7,0.0010864807,0.000053085918,0.000057125584,0.98950684,0.00010417522,0.008123667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006871168,0.00010026381,0.0045517134,0.000009601345,0.00001991367,0.00001633421,0.015045434,0.0004207325,0.000016414622,0.50458884,0.47440603,0.00013761317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032008549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05915992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.484918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085363694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092606264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95800793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338421469","doi":"","title":"Dialogue between Courts and Tribunals: Essays in Administrative Law and Justice (2001-2007)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Administrative law; Sociology; Administration of justice; Public administration; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04961626847222056,"score_gpt":0.34145580343516874,"score_spread":0.2918395349629482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338421469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9221929,0.0034141098,0.0013882623,0.0071670613,0.000104756684,0.00032233837,0.00003034818,0.000032601154,0.06534764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98799133,0.010386175,0.00006918112,0.00016298436,0.00053043023,0.000006404695,0.0000029808846,0.0000070778565,0.0008434304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980894,0.0001512044,0.00020939359,0.00016277509,0.00020508785,0.0011821679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994074,0.00020067459,0.00009859875,0.000063521504,0.000056796347,0.00017300188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017465546,0.00009272652,0.00016095964,0.000042992273,0.00097630377,0.000064575135,0.00013683044,0.000083414656,0.00001832249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011446299,0.00008621144,0.000026281581,0.00012273867,0.00035412,0.0002312556,0.000026438045,0.0008785101,0.0000057285474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001076223,0.00003490208,0.0055802567,0.0000028367576,0.000021033999,0.0000071036525,0.0025601839,0.0000017593777,0.000010413997,0.99040645,0.00013386983,0.001230405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014498244,0.0003543955,0.017663196,0.000029160208,0.00011257682,0.00027547756,0.014709562,0.000029159966,0.000029813655,0.80053943,0.16440718,0.00040020168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002173366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02049776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18986702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031126876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017423406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339579576","doi":"","title":"Checking in to Club Resorts: How Courts are Applying the New Test for Jurisdiction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Club; Personal jurisdiction; Presumption; Doctrine; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Civil procedure; Test (biology); Medicine","score_opus":0.017265068575965277,"score_gpt":0.2921520228342574,"score_spread":0.2748869542582921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339579576","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35956904,0.0027245758,0.09499207,0.5243027,0.0005680179,0.006763208,0.00000832389,0.00016219344,0.010909866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931921,0.0005358066,0.00019379555,0.0003466558,0.0009923107,0.0002886521,7.747354e-7,0.000012000566,0.004437945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982388,0.000043541022,0.00015318848,0.0001362117,0.0002247785,0.0012034785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994153,0.00015258875,0.00012810093,0.00010979829,0.00008480811,0.00010940749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015657445,0.00007478454,0.000089555884,0.000056647244,0.0008991229,0.00028165348,0.0003015253,0.000055318644,0.000017438155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028740053,0.00005630986,0.00006003743,0.0002472852,0.000032516888,0.00025387292,0.000025407347,0.0006835227,0.00002147834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020117848,0.00012373002,0.014955309,0.000006847163,0.000048075635,7.20769e-7,0.009394068,0.00030296505,0.0013631756,0.72740287,0.016909435,0.22947267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038929607,0.00008448334,0.0061400966,0.000037445516,0.000016194384,0.000012183786,0.024649082,0.0002393574,0.000053085092,0.28820342,0.68000424,0.00017110194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023070218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029536795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6630948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008108955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012876714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98817164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341367679","doi":"10.7202/1035639ar","title":"Classification of Property and Conceptions of Ownership in Civil and Common Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feudalism; Property (philosophy); Law; Civil law (Civil law); Institution; Property law; Common law; Sociology; Flexibility (engineering); Legal history; Comparative law; Law and economics; Political science; Commercial law; Property rights; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.04113192195556087,"score_gpt":0.28943074855975337,"score_spread":0.2482988266041925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341367679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93588287,0.00005312791,0.00009907031,0.004507003,0.0000073521824,0.00018238516,0.000017787526,0.000009621299,0.05924076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987784,0.00018626724,0.000103496575,0.000025757545,0.000025058798,0.00001763089,0.0000012120121,0.0000028713996,0.0008593283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995839,0.000049651237,0.00013508098,0.00008964653,0.000053951768,0.000087785775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996771,0.000084323045,0.00006998476,0.00009658233,0.000030421774,0.00004157597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002532497,0.000024968878,0.00009062567,0.00002144121,0.000059356553,0.0000074309896,0.00006788913,0.000045432018,0.000016915632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037538004,0.00002071804,0.000014124682,0.00009474417,0.0003760666,0.00008703316,0.000017393932,0.000033099837,0.000001713679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044653602,0.00003411436,0.06633841,0.000031409883,0.0000023719276,1.8281642e-7,0.0025543226,6.880829e-7,0.01467026,0.9103479,0.000024718121,0.005991161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009283778,0.000085942396,0.76084036,0.0004348698,0.00003113119,0.000003937404,0.0040430264,0.00029719228,0.0022983763,0.19000599,0.040785603,0.0002451771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020259703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015087978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7203419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038406884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030786232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8419446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341524204","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-19054-9_2","title":"New Wine in Old Bottles: Corrupt Foreign Contracts in Canadian Private Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Language change; Criminal law; Damages; Conviction; Private law; Common law; Conflict of laws; Civil law (Civil law); Legislation; Public law; Liability","score_opus":0.06895072454714958,"score_gpt":0.3252219681275689,"score_spread":0.2562712435804193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341524204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040660487,0.0006235058,0.000012696151,0.0020942397,0.00026998678,0.00068597985,0.00007504323,0.00003940695,0.9957925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48798096,0.000051962983,0.0001877734,0.0006555525,0.0005689709,0.000021111759,0.00008140161,0.00003407974,0.5104182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982278,0.000033410575,0.0004023584,0.00035854345,0.00034543104,0.00063247676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859107,0.00006525702,0.00015052996,0.00034860283,0.00008037346,0.0007641632],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043961345,0.00024419665,0.00045176217,0.00017929536,0.0001667689,0.00012828782,0.00052591757,0.00036693006,0.0004032284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029533041,0.00026412262,0.00007026137,0.00012255418,0.00018756023,0.00014508156,0.00005125441,0.0005777426,0.0004962806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062555137,0.000010660216,0.00028679558,0.000003559151,0.000006383097,0.000037562313,0.00077932497,0.000047435857,0.0000015098838,0.9596456,0.038988218,0.00018664481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033268126,0.000013305567,0.00048925064,0.00010017853,0.00000817347,0.0000010660618,0.000069212336,0.00005214286,0.0000010797326,0.11584387,0.88282204,0.00026702601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8406702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98364496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8438338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086204207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020851619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341673510","doi":"","title":"“Private Property Rights and Public Responsibility: Leaving Room for the Homeless”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"City Research Online (City University London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Property law; Numerus clausus; Jurisprudence; Property rights; Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Tangible property; Political science; Business; Intangible property; Sociology","score_opus":0.21921670570976343,"score_gpt":0.37078117699156904,"score_spread":0.1515644712818056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341673510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976199,0.00008375866,0.0010579331,0.013840652,0.000048190795,0.0013378774,0.00021093023,0.000105846324,0.0071158265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879335,0.0003055356,0.0015296545,0.00006226319,0.00015678357,0.000007224572,0.000018690589,0.000008627371,0.009977708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752635,0.0006218473,0.00014379466,0.00046365787,0.00056286494,0.00068149314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744785,0.00093102315,0.000060309387,0.00051927386,0.0006968779,0.00034464925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032031655,0.0001157608,0.00018518604,0.00016802581,0.0044408226,0.00017768463,0.0010516605,0.00013463503,0.00012355238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010644457,0.000078749516,0.00009318068,0.00085044815,0.0014472839,0.00062516646,0.0006493512,0.0005794044,0.000010265965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008298131,0.0013067962,0.051862843,0.000070756,0.00013272684,0.000023569413,0.014095083,0.000001416647,0.000361558,0.9005298,0.0034941924,0.02729146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057510706,0.000091620015,0.04044188,0.000015787413,0.000020255991,8.649555e-7,0.004765622,0.00044021185,0.000098590215,0.017092427,0.93627757,0.00018006221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03299651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105465904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93278337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028419233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000510147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99685526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342085789","doi":"","title":"Prometheus Bound or Loose Cannon? Punitive Damages for Pure Breach of Contract in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Breach of contract; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.0219427764834844,"score_gpt":0.2522500638585798,"score_spread":0.2303072873750954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342085789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97605556,0.000031764946,0.000202224,0.00094024406,0.000022528298,0.00042315343,0.00076488213,0.000009524757,0.021550117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989224,0.000010277558,0.00011491083,0.000021940745,0.000013152806,0.0000010229841,0.00003797917,0.0000043648806,0.0008739273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993898,0.000013719194,0.00009525554,0.00013370633,0.0001781924,0.00018931073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944973,0.000116042516,0.00010865423,0.00010065216,0.00013790041,0.000087040215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009219059,0.000066017856,0.00016632973,0.00005602157,0.00017959379,0.000026509322,0.00026394258,0.000042418415,0.000066891254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007142371,0.00007129081,0.00004907717,0.00028576065,0.0002565566,0.00044453895,0.0000468,0.00006553337,0.0000013072003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012210263,0.0022252796,0.061033506,0.00047433944,0.00045503923,0.00027757173,0.11521411,0.000719737,0.0012350907,0.6564304,0.0042957035,0.15641816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007442095,0.00056535954,0.42396623,0.00033934173,0.00015557051,0.0000058080404,0.3536991,0.0001225009,0.00070443767,0.040169213,0.17175622,0.0010741295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8647519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61626124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035381425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001857079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32943785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342974016","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx027","title":"Conceptions of Authority and the Anglo-American Common Law Divide","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.06470010365945968,"score_gpt":0.41108569366609915,"score_spread":0.3463855900066395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342974016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240686,0.00011036463,0.00032704405,0.029003054,0.00005045264,0.0001515079,0.000014718082,0.000005313623,0.046268906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988498,0.00008860289,0.00021404546,0.0005779991,0.00018773483,0.0000046992477,2.1450874e-7,0.0000032750588,0.00007363278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866414,0.0005790543,0.0002755812,0.00007006504,0.0002690079,0.00014217517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976475,0.00067699194,0.0010693003,0.0003236636,0.00019413594,0.00008838991],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010967433,0.00007625344,0.00042294266,0.000011413276,0.0020190435,0.00014585085,0.00079314737,0.000008950046,0.000012756395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021949967,0.000040554372,0.000106795094,0.00011619202,0.020969199,0.00019642487,0.00010142976,0.0002348737,0.0000031460775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008080009,0.000029028348,0.0011030613,5.8432175e-7,0.000047832975,3.9818252e-7,0.018080903,0.000013600334,0.000080048354,0.97908956,0.00017962481,0.0012945504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019159191,0.00084018765,0.16263671,0.000079193145,0.00031144024,0.000025099083,0.07242417,0.00015798425,0.0007491367,0.33342272,0.4270902,0.00034722307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0162904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065208003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64566684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023743602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000648743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343181159","doi":"10.5040/9781782256595","title":"The Common Law of Obligations : Divergence and Unity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Divergence (linguistics); Law; Common law; Political science; Municipal law; Comparative law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Sources of law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03722403890192696,"score_gpt":0.28970269781135005,"score_spread":0.2524786589094231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343181159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000254668,0.000104270184,0.000026323181,0.004728047,0.00018419152,0.00026376572,0.00014946937,0.000056575296,0.9942327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08930105,0.000085066764,0.000040623265,0.00023363624,0.0003735602,0.000036284575,0.000018834944,0.000014552769,0.9098964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988795,0.00010748452,0.00023948296,0.00018183477,0.00038026547,0.00021143648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840945,0.00063195813,0.00024791184,0.00035921045,0.00023121176,0.00012028268],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010210585,0.00010490244,0.00014888482,0.000031195465,0.0019323585,0.0010037116,0.00068538537,0.0001942275,0.000037434747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018745837,0.000071179835,0.000062320316,0.00003790551,0.0011899184,0.0004548472,0.00027797898,0.00031799317,0.000013190803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.062593e-7,0.0000030394076,0.000043129097,0.000007136791,0.000010805903,1.7747693e-7,0.0011066018,4.4907043e-8,0.0000104211795,0.93858254,0.05554765,0.004687544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003679241,0.000004123372,0.00008996545,0.000053435746,0.00001377922,1.6559923e-7,0.00012377695,7.71343e-7,0.000016955795,0.20340466,0.7961799,0.00007566298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034241728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01786457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74063224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088800196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005410989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343280807","doi":"10.5235/204033211796290236","title":"That Can't Be Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09642817852675073,"score_gpt":0.33244959957679376,"score_spread":0.23602142105004303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343280807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20762491,0.00006432418,0.0003834987,0.004327328,0.00022788197,0.00022513952,0.000011461907,0.00015830726,0.7869771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911267,0.0000368282,0.0008366492,0.00041166716,0.00012663225,0.000025676716,8.181074e-7,0.0000039089177,0.0074310917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992838,0.00003423039,0.00007584552,0.00015565193,0.00023499013,0.00021546551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995716,0.00003244563,0.00004158227,0.00019937656,0.00003725535,0.000117704396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018679195,0.000054739485,0.000059848084,0.000019827607,0.00050698523,0.00003694583,0.00036035344,0.000052826144,0.0007460373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001940994,0.000047265068,0.000035618086,0.00014635135,0.00018163366,0.00014785465,0.000042638574,0.000080189035,0.00019457571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002477212,0.000051252166,0.0054434817,0.0000020791244,0.000004740793,0.000005668042,0.021416659,2.0079916e-7,0.00008789106,0.9657831,0.006252852,0.0009496072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053779735,0.000009624677,0.016220542,0.0000063802927,0.0000067062683,5.717546e-7,0.00066105655,0.0000038959483,0.0022320116,0.021716494,0.9589695,0.000119455864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022506403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014319342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95271665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038910995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084587824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343595580","doi":"","title":"Caveat Cloudster: Why Traditional Common and Civil Property Law Should Apply to Virtual Property and How It Will Change the Legal Realities of the Internet","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tangible property; Property (philosophy); Property law; Intangible property; Intellectual property; Digital Millennium Copyright Act; Law and economics; Business; Property rights; Real property; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.1856089506789757,"score_gpt":0.3280840012781128,"score_spread":0.14247505059913712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343595580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47122428,0.0034954427,0.000047502886,0.4979456,0.0007105541,0.0012039716,0.00015844012,0.000026668637,0.025187539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233055,0.00037488426,0.000044162898,0.0033917802,0.00068367424,0.000039433417,8.236775e-7,0.000011093792,0.003123616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841076,0.00026021566,0.0003047626,0.00014676596,0.0006632542,0.00021422446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988993,0.00016468589,0.00026041045,0.00014292444,0.00038030662,0.0001523775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011629605,0.00015213614,0.000334778,0.000032041142,0.00056956004,0.00022528913,0.0004059642,0.000053318407,0.00000434397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017846205,0.000059783702,0.0000820466,0.0001571306,0.0011958011,0.0006229962,0.00029576596,0.00029266768,6.4806477e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028384765,0.0002446844,0.0044338717,0.00007786901,0.0004584733,0.0000177077,0.2235476,0.000021834312,0.00016676472,0.54273313,0.22162642,0.00638782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033006037,0.0003906982,0.0014033216,0.00011392689,0.00006637307,0.000047036763,0.031715475,0.000015810478,0.0000677186,0.001199769,0.96453065,0.000119163444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008791686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04166272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74290425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009480684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012125945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346001065","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Land Claims in New Zealand and Canada, from Grievance to Enterprise","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Indigenous; Land rights; Land law; Geography; Land tenure; Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Law; Archaeology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.006059886689152292,"score_gpt":0.204084407202047,"score_spread":0.1980245205128947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346001065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6363187,0.000040924053,0.00013531698,0.3628147,0.000015969574,0.000077717166,0.000017331346,0.0000063396496,0.0005730065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8227225,0.00013265504,0.0012874112,0.00007874343,0.0000817231,1.6398161e-7,0.0000072290263,0.0000046117134,0.17568497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995736,0.000020602494,0.000007745835,0.0001266873,0.00012758374,0.00014376473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997128,0.000031316642,0.000039297218,0.00008928648,0.000019913079,0.000107376494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000056504345,0.0000411255,0.00008692433,0.000033456276,0.00016445991,0.000013361357,0.00014231712,0.000035936366,0.000004209944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000042594484,0.000054145992,0.000012398355,0.0001314387,0.00005588432,0.000082139726,0.000037425267,0.000053430937,0.000003515223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024334564,0.000015713607,0.44102848,0.0000032000733,0.000006199515,0.000026076292,0.007561654,0.000084009516,0.00008165616,0.0037940522,0.54501325,0.002361365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018448428,0.000007636519,0.12752917,0.0000111198015,0.000004520043,1.4779732e-7,0.0027327023,0.0000049661658,0.0000049584596,0.000119153,0.86934584,0.00005528304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9634509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99856335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36273596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011995186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004461996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22080095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346418613","doi":"","title":"The incompleteness of accounting rules and justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.023794405601988092,"score_gpt":0.32048698136718007,"score_spread":0.296692575765192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346418613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9396113,0.00030295312,0.00021482917,0.0045582224,0.000085011,0.00011495853,0.0000022254267,0.00003921931,0.05507128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988377,0.000100595615,0.00040757286,0.00024552603,0.00029287988,0.00000311326,6.391546e-7,0.000003171873,0.00010879989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993679,0.000024993833,0.00015149072,0.0000980101,0.0001731483,0.00018447558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993356,0.00031191699,0.00012164838,0.00010897109,0.00009876203,0.000023091428],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077255967,0.000046520167,0.000068414636,0.000016446615,0.0013795972,0.00017337,0.00021853889,0.000031057327,0.0000059164286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003125818,0.000035206274,0.000020550206,0.00014864112,0.00013750048,0.00022698463,0.000047284673,0.00007038283,0.000006908791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030377992,0.000016048702,0.00654846,0.000014260273,0.0000059798167,3.3133796e-7,0.0030206863,0.000011666449,0.0014568957,0.887976,0.00020450026,0.10074217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002804124,0.000019591676,0.2373134,0.000077655764,0.00009753888,0.0000023471223,0.019995207,0.0014922725,0.00034583802,0.05596788,0.6840829,0.00032490533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097135245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034079442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83200806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001318467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042133473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346729302","doi":"10.7202/1036168ar","title":"Les obligations de la banque au regard des sommes déposées dans un compte en fidéicommis","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022243004138695097,"score_gpt":0.2891361347788276,"score_spread":0.2668931306401325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346729302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7120535,0.0006341953,0.010287986,0.028660156,0.00015127074,0.00027951814,0.00018599813,0.0001309358,0.24761644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96050745,0.0017427643,0.0047697704,0.00016179535,0.00097371935,0.00009527596,0.000012443638,0.00003650723,0.0317003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977703,0.0005957495,0.00036376805,0.00036103695,0.00018633655,0.00072282396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775475,0.0012087738,0.00016259015,0.00043569723,0.00009406688,0.0003441109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096240453,0.00017865388,0.00026873226,0.00006123297,0.0011556646,0.00015335243,0.00065675256,0.00033950538,0.00045309533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032235307,0.0002085039,0.00022577544,0.00041521213,0.0015621588,0.0003472151,0.0001269545,0.00027358776,0.0003146754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004385802,0.00016168976,0.07843932,0.00007390795,0.000053791122,0.000012866028,0.022289012,0.00005349484,0.0018409684,0.8316831,0.00085651013,0.06453095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045454863,0.000045761608,0.16488314,0.00056173425,0.00013933193,0.00006070178,0.0031336544,0.00023993783,0.0030608887,0.57497084,0.25198966,0.0004598252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122451885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008654783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2567123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013665427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036387655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235110027","doi":"","title":"Duties, Liabilities and Damages","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01383848270066181,"score_gpt":0.29422105207690596,"score_spread":0.2803825693762442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235110027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83488953,0.015535742,0.0011769284,0.013838501,0.0002858802,0.00018243246,0.0000035875478,0.00007396305,0.13401344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848455,0.0045556966,0.000078723184,0.00007199062,0.00069391064,0.000003834844,4.1402586e-7,0.0000051195266,0.009744802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983109,0.0000712329,0.00008976811,0.000056811106,0.0001422928,0.0013289491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996988,0.000053318996,0.000041613835,0.00006214628,0.000031396336,0.00011272659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017156587,0.000049000475,0.000058683843,0.000024504734,0.00070363603,0.00007353503,0.00011952889,0.000036658268,0.00007532568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007402524,0.00004202915,0.000029276145,0.0000746917,0.00015043038,0.00033407245,0.000018149402,0.00051116553,0.000019571728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013656356,0.000016199307,0.008579322,8.8911077e-7,0.000010003586,3.5907714e-8,0.0033889657,2.4311802e-7,0.000015323727,0.981655,0.00012178911,0.00621086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011098259,0.000031496278,0.0036530446,0.0000034039422,0.0000138628,0.000025562376,0.04688396,0.0000020141795,0.00001624737,0.34994087,0.5992172,0.000101393074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068449666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022874367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6317141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029683072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007654848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54118705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2353885775","doi":"","title":"Chinese Multilateral Recognition and Enforcement Arrangement for Civil and Commercial Judgments:Proposed Solutions for Four Critical Challenges","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; China; Enforcement; Mainland China; Political science; Obstacle; Law and economics; Business; International trade; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.27886563289478034,"score_gpt":0.4744573319981545,"score_spread":0.19559169910337415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2353885775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55729973,0.0002705446,0.03077381,0.36474365,0.002255567,0.005643367,0.0012534135,0.00012726597,0.037632667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953866,0.0003635805,0.0020693985,0.00012721228,0.0008990794,0.0006862265,0.000087926586,0.000010780354,0.00036917895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875677,0.000047545058,0.00016360616,0.00025109763,0.00042959742,0.00035140643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782485,0.0006302848,0.000028879831,0.00008816426,0.00131812,0.00010971945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013161234,0.00007952589,0.0000891115,0.0001252592,0.0010556383,0.00019101701,0.00017626051,0.00007602951,0.00018526606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012715546,0.00007262618,0.000031181433,0.000105059735,0.00038678595,0.00025768438,0.00014226483,0.00015882077,0.0000082378065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047700634,0.0007754948,0.0018863834,0.00026132053,0.00011895734,0.0000021780959,0.007183495,0.000011366694,0.011330093,0.8131218,0.0030776095,0.16175431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002731329,0.00012969477,0.08680859,0.00007808772,0.000025491954,0.000004437236,0.0015078379,0.0045849993,0.00018100305,0.14187343,0.76171815,0.00035697495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095724984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007245821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7586405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059764487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087632994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8119223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2361095287","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3873","title":"Acquisitive prescription and fundamental rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Doctrine; Nothing; Medical prescription; Law; Virtue; Political science; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.01045418138607904,"score_gpt":0.23882048966831887,"score_spread":0.22836630828223983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2361095287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37607422,0.0003223914,0.0016206707,0.0035134922,0.00014729041,0.00012528762,0.000023888655,0.000022030603,0.6181507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959363,0.00023949727,0.00038521184,0.000015813095,0.00007810815,1.9859758e-8,1.9079089e-7,9.446511e-7,0.0033439696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996647,0.00004398491,0.000040513914,0.000055543227,0.00011276782,0.0000824751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997405,0.000021650843,0.000056402667,0.00003550471,0.000055228313,0.00009071155],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001234421,0.00002701627,0.000045144046,0.000004760226,0.0008680811,0.000018858384,0.00009370894,0.000026904454,0.0010389534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000030459441,0.000021363767,0.000028465722,0.000007582975,0.00026116587,0.00054868497,0.000029130159,0.000024626168,0.000005419899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026545184,0.000029251589,0.0006934517,9.5299237e-7,0.000018434985,0.0000036000251,0.0070050824,1.3268176e-7,0.0013086741,0.9853639,0.0007715645,0.0047783917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004249938,0.000037490398,0.0103243375,0.000021477388,0.000015404905,0.000003990588,0.006443406,0.0000017009709,0.00008398538,0.0036647667,0.97892416,0.000054314743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06566434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17548618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98169917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019964727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021581245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2364822245","doi":"","title":"The Nature of Trust for Independent Management of Property by Entrustment and How to Integrate the Trust System into the Civil Code——from the Categorization Perspective of Property Management Entrustment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Beifang faxue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Trust law; Express trust; Blind trust; Property (philosophy); Trust management (information system); Civil code; Business; Property management; Agency (philosophy); Law; Voting trust; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Computer security; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010030623814099393,"score_gpt":0.25890139933339823,"score_spread":0.24887077551929884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2364822245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36196345,0.006964322,0.040511087,0.4437338,0.0019961798,0.050422717,0.0011570706,0.00022460464,0.093026765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938353,0.00037246748,0.00029836225,0.00019639698,0.00009074917,0.0008512299,0.0000147582805,0.000015218078,0.0043255226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982094,0.0003041999,0.00030893905,0.00032676428,0.0005970502,0.00025365167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855435,0.00022938558,0.00032051714,0.00056637963,0.00027078943,0.000058567173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014406616,0.0001744889,0.00020811209,0.000024003068,0.0009302818,0.00013731494,0.00086416554,0.000082333,0.0000067334863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006308704,0.000058997855,0.00009717201,0.00029737232,0.00037407284,0.00006761199,0.00027913874,0.00016283525,0.0000016886138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077403834,0.00009535574,0.000273644,0.000110940644,0.0003086193,2.1349736e-7,0.026035713,0.00006076584,0.00031236146,0.9556143,0.0047139684,0.012396712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000817479,0.00018127073,0.004337514,0.00021535641,0.00039709845,4.3347129e-7,0.27740812,0.0017905582,0.0025428082,0.003838309,0.7082496,0.00022141135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059888116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038735482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95177597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003017593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005216485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9053331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W236800487","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004847","title":"Improperly Collected Taxes: The Border Between Private and Public Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Doctrine; Restitution; Law; Political science; Normative; Private law; Constitutional law; Public law; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02420793817266316,"score_gpt":0.3110538842295081,"score_spread":0.28684594605684494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W236800487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109955,0.0003279344,0.00008066946,0.036564592,0.00031358504,0.00026766877,0.000054813398,0.000012449018,0.051382776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765694,0.000033380857,0.00033445988,0.00087015075,0.00048053375,0.0000051693382,6.87123e-7,0.00000935373,0.00060935295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988917,0.00008916563,0.00026193203,0.00011881585,0.0002525762,0.00038581731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983312,0.00013285727,0.00018212695,0.00019809602,0.0003255048,0.00083024317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007822858,0.00008637186,0.0001386467,0.000047530793,0.0017498909,0.0005611135,0.0007075483,0.0000977275,0.00019617862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020749542,0.00006106019,0.00004982413,0.0003247937,0.0011981236,0.00041758682,0.000023405295,0.00052945834,0.000012375062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011597378,0.0000055409637,0.006848476,0.000002570669,0.000017515167,0.000010225602,0.0026763536,3.146908e-7,0.00038553379,0.98725355,0.0009830123,0.0018157328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010813779,0.000028998276,0.010743072,0.000011970851,0.000017960652,0.000013504528,0.0003832264,0.0000021253488,0.00008274273,0.005234806,0.9832803,0.00009317406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17765336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84802496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98229724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006547612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017544967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2369288094","doi":"","title":"Discussion on Qualifications of Property Owners of Residential Quarter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Wenzhou University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property management; Real estate; Business; Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Estate; Property law; Legislature; Property rights; Real property; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Intangible property; Law and economics; Finance; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01919868074748187,"score_gpt":0.28944079124622885,"score_spread":0.27024211049874697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2369288094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534927,0.000003202236,0.0005434767,0.01631841,0.00024720607,0.00011129253,0.00001858953,0.0000068659756,0.029258283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617624,0.000020079991,0.00046784955,0.000009353708,0.00009573927,4.426895e-8,5.402654e-7,0.0000018934084,0.0032282714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933577,0.000092850176,0.00017895618,0.000055260094,0.00026699345,0.00007015386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991267,0.000047146714,0.00039620523,0.00011973658,0.00023416919,0.00007604886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004562524,0.000035157085,0.000103526974,0.0000904392,0.00019110132,0.0000075926396,0.00027960003,0.00005188984,0.0001224989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008523102,0.000019554169,0.00009844978,0.00018017708,0.00019264805,0.00019399665,0.000021287784,0.00017297361,0.0000043410078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006116828,0.0015792135,0.017892918,0.00004923623,0.00014271606,0.000013329007,0.046491794,0.00013274737,0.26191157,0.6175234,0.04586898,0.0077824458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009640233,0.0002756235,0.051955532,0.000076249715,0.000110314926,0.0000025193383,0.035010397,0.00003091478,0.0082247015,0.0014565377,0.9017279,0.00016529458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008427947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010421769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8558589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032006472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019035011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14698163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2370864305","doi":"","title":"Research on the Establishment and Application of Punitive Damages in China's Copyright Infringement: in the Background of the Third Amendment of Copyright Law of China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Tort; Damages; Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Business; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.08181381851861066,"score_gpt":0.3898436735424806,"score_spread":0.3080298550238699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2370864305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74830604,0.00004470965,0.000043841785,0.006063795,0.000011784453,0.00096776895,0.000015912574,0.0000024932742,0.24454366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949855,0.000083580155,0.000060711576,0.00005945857,0.000014219046,0.00010407823,0.0000022381319,0.0000033684062,0.00017381173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980442,0.00056516513,0.00033794227,0.00014156333,0.0007478045,0.00016333241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987867,0.00043684558,0.00019993688,0.00038453768,0.00016122086,0.00003075148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004148158,0.000069698384,0.00014994983,0.00007294134,0.00017231371,0.000028951135,0.00062977226,0.000043839445,0.000029114837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041556723,0.00003315963,0.00002952135,0.00079573045,0.0010710992,0.000113638554,0.00017846716,0.00020164781,0.0000010562376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020421932,0.00029828917,0.0025066636,0.00001792069,0.0000068392665,5.6569682e-8,0.019191021,0.00004412546,0.00042840076,0.97703344,0.00031603265,0.00013677157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018032439,0.0005483184,0.4231546,0.00030075567,0.000037698082,3.779065e-7,0.29979718,0.0007279874,0.068977065,0.15887515,0.04552201,0.00025562814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041591037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017099662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8181583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008343757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010588244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9647911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2374084926","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Margaret Jane Radin, Boilerplate, the Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, and the Rule of Law (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2013)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Democracy; Severability; Sociology; Economics; Exclusion clause; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.013075682700066848,"score_gpt":0.2576372167940441,"score_spread":0.24456153409397727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2374084926","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01949122,0.6131301,0.0018013634,0.17969847,0.00038463174,0.002578245,0.000031510102,0.00010822416,0.18277623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41207376,0.51719797,0.00015529717,0.0031259058,0.00087276305,0.000015931348,0.0000070280917,0.000030505626,0.06652082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803144,0.0003811098,0.00024421845,0.00016327151,0.00038046367,0.0007995264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990159,0.00014370034,0.00029356385,0.0002614562,0.00016328772,0.00012208424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004083065,0.00011194639,0.0002179872,0.000015608533,0.0010045634,0.00008160224,0.0007214388,0.000058842044,0.0000459682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066873494,0.00006494831,0.00009005496,0.00013401402,0.0006053656,0.00035848047,0.00015121538,0.0009974135,0.0000059006684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000449456,0.000024530305,0.000039214792,0.000012534927,0.000055087145,0.0000011122869,0.001328439,0.0000132872,0.0000045934275,0.97953093,0.018248208,0.000697106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006527207,0.000033931276,0.00004240647,0.00007438791,0.00006682334,0.00003510734,0.000519582,0.00003115026,0.000026023557,0.030577183,0.967853,0.000087646615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00667765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005502058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004066235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009078304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2377765276","doi":"","title":"On Theory of Abolishment of Coerced Apology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sichuan Police college","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Legislation; Tort; Law; Political science; Legislature; Anger; Liability; Damages; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.018879125927078518,"score_gpt":0.3176060461059463,"score_spread":0.29872692017886776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2377765276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8578212,0.000047999863,0.0002620759,0.003486387,0.00020247289,0.00013751017,0.00003831972,0.000005748922,0.13799825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809855,0.000048406575,0.00021306376,0.00037949908,0.00033211434,0.0000017925105,2.6406448e-7,0.0000058446267,0.00092045416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988017,0.00022667961,0.0004321824,0.00006530655,0.00031565162,0.0001584713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836415,0.0005273759,0.0005983047,0.0001451397,0.0002521612,0.00011289721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012353335,0.000063771404,0.00026489765,0.00011564945,0.00011561708,0.0000068067807,0.0003380465,0.00006963938,0.00012862889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022452277,0.000052135096,0.00011982609,0.00022749431,0.00027928804,0.00007610397,0.00002864662,0.00013119893,0.0000075456123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006286347,0.00012868867,0.00015497261,0.000008309892,0.000025997957,2.998028e-7,0.0047380044,0.000031801075,0.0015077697,0.9889233,0.0036710524,0.0007469441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033307315,0.0017931103,0.028646225,0.00022802476,0.00021821084,0.000016543225,0.026648104,0.00007206304,0.014155967,0.23700385,0.68749183,0.00039533916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008443311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033748074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75191945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050551327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002023444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21260075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387039812","doi":"","title":"The Analysis and Revelation from the Land Expropriation Compensation Theory in Some Countries (Areas)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Order (exchange); Natural resource economics; Economics; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.015570710823763337,"score_gpt":0.2756619345650785,"score_spread":0.26009122374131516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387039812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97673714,0.00011595267,0.0016792567,0.010150074,0.00003782691,0.00028547333,0.0000057882457,0.000018469453,0.01097004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898136,0.00010330759,0.00007480789,0.0005204227,0.00014847254,0.00002586801,0.000014654017,0.0000013878954,0.00012969425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993544,0.00015899523,0.00017755537,0.00012327005,0.00005918537,0.00012656936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976672,0.0020910597,0.00009241659,0.000090855225,0.000028909459,0.000029551451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022936836,0.000042288888,0.00007816794,0.000021640522,0.00071845227,0.0001317666,0.00011534338,0.000063431275,0.00015660605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019621821,0.000024109862,0.000027977207,0.00016820607,0.0001876193,0.00016633455,0.000027248429,0.000079961756,0.000022513212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010299687,0.000011465295,0.4148022,2.410728e-7,0.000018955583,1.6579561e-7,0.0011800483,0.0000380591,0.0000012835233,0.5808775,0.000029161534,0.0030306245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007718521,0.000003877428,0.8258404,6.3012095e-7,0.000017860904,2.3063311e-8,0.00091343815,0.00019067255,0.0000036428414,0.12547334,0.04744455,0.00003436547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011034947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028807905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45540416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008434749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030749863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98891383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2387444302","doi":"","title":"Rational Thoughts on \"System of Being Held Responsible for Misjudge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Guangxi Administative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04664267912043425,"score_gpt":0.36406767359407516,"score_spread":0.3174249944736409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2387444302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8276382,0.00019245331,0.0070777927,0.0089291725,0.00068258314,0.00052254763,0.00041686185,0.000011759101,0.1545286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99420434,0.000060005776,0.0038868256,0.00018199706,0.00048772103,0.000004198534,0.0000039701245,0.0000061140568,0.0011648278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893963,0.00006123275,0.00045816085,0.00008563782,0.00029199425,0.00016332089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983914,0.00035480276,0.000457521,0.00007617181,0.0005797677,0.00014034573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058287696,0.000078270365,0.00023321128,0.000082178616,0.000326179,0.000029570016,0.0001339353,0.000058095193,0.000006853759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022535332,0.0000667228,0.00009891995,0.00011880478,0.00044696635,0.00019572252,0.000015567264,0.00009466387,5.3203496e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010032138,0.00007096932,0.000086305416,0.000043088978,0.000033216504,0.000008208882,0.0032914747,0.000016949534,0.0005597005,0.9953718,0.00031716455,0.00010075652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089532405,0.00065550674,0.0004569735,0.0002785299,0.00006533985,0.000024497142,0.010315618,0.00003803999,0.009695861,0.043533847,0.93390894,0.00013153537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003133292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005662823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.951838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007704736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006139802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2720877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2391269404","doi":"","title":"A Talk about the Efficacy of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract on Third-Parth Beneficiary","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Huaqiao University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prairie Improvement Network","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Third party; Payment; Business; Obligation; Third person; Actuarial science; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Finance; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.024940593999460445,"score_gpt":0.27887551437266667,"score_spread":0.2539349203732062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2391269404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.940177,0.00019972384,0.000087274944,0.005028076,0.00016012212,0.00017087109,0.000019304636,0.000019182442,0.054138444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974278,0.00085825415,0.000083918785,0.00024143026,0.00031014904,1.397915e-7,0.000001183156,0.000006252243,0.0010708644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985765,0.00019110838,0.0003082545,0.00013043982,0.00053590984,0.00025775895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821395,0.0005430914,0.0005701111,0.000234391,0.00028388173,0.00015454902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009493434,0.000111700574,0.00025684736,0.00010639055,0.000799783,0.000039197726,0.0006888647,0.00010471017,0.0001476855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014796342,0.00008349106,0.00027529115,0.00040502672,0.00024132612,0.0003127541,0.00006624781,0.00041608527,0.000019752215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027380995,0.0038182666,0.042529143,0.00003071004,0.0006948493,0.0008258428,0.02488194,0.008343314,0.0033726369,0.8637387,0.020498218,0.028528262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015918664,0.0002727562,0.2126391,0.00010615978,0.00018326181,0.00003551005,0.008010889,0.00015335859,0.00026575653,0.0015219261,0.7749853,0.00023407619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014710097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017745584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8622168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013834682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031204833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6151365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395124077","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court's Decision in Peoples: A New Standard of Directors' Liability?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Due diligence; Diligence; Corporation; Law; Internal revenue; Liability; Business; Agency (philosophy); Accounting; Revenue; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Service (business)","score_opus":0.014066832438940002,"score_gpt":0.2954388642385844,"score_spread":0.2813720317996444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395124077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831648,0.002296815,0.003776821,0.006061986,0.00011755439,0.00021149035,0.0000029479554,0.000017701066,0.004349868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97970885,0.018243637,0.00013674413,0.00001636812,0.00021021932,0.0000035317516,3.1780857e-7,0.000006920029,0.0016734311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978828,0.00013571233,0.0003100969,0.00012047004,0.00047836176,0.0010725479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990129,0.00048332158,0.00012841485,0.00016484316,0.0001097392,0.00010081455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028298525,0.00007188087,0.00014323894,0.000044193035,0.00083523954,0.00004148213,0.00041701566,0.00005381475,0.00003607685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006219394,0.00005027642,0.00009456509,0.00035377566,0.00019513717,0.00015111036,0.000032226442,0.000719957,0.000007939462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018385383,0.00009200154,0.03627423,0.0000022187587,0.000032217937,0.0000015547103,0.010754206,0.00007196268,0.00009554076,0.90598905,0.0011790199,0.045324154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010256594,0.00031262764,0.020148925,0.00004380534,0.00001765066,0.000044808192,0.01810112,0.000032455344,0.000110705056,0.60533065,0.35462353,0.00020805001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042117364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19180436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35344452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009055259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008499364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395634684","doi":"","title":"Property Structures Underlying Contract (The Proprietary Properties of Contract)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Privity of contract; Property (philosophy); Exclusion clause; Contract management; Severability; Contract theory; Law and economics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03560458823435354,"score_gpt":0.2844330592121037,"score_spread":0.24882847097775018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395634684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638413,0.0034294128,0.0007402556,0.021690087,0.00012892766,0.0011582493,0.0000013079563,0.000046170575,0.008964276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968594,0.0010327864,0.000049448834,0.00018168113,0.00023154903,0.000035082565,4.705498e-7,0.000011332485,0.0015982479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783254,0.00016723177,0.00028946437,0.00012297726,0.0003776939,0.001210091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926054,0.00004473103,0.00021869017,0.00015164995,0.00024633046,0.00007808138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001269422,0.00010365535,0.00015205641,0.00002885265,0.0009777256,0.00016494202,0.000463713,0.00006947221,0.0001370149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012860319,0.000048791924,0.000096787204,0.00013813065,0.0003293307,0.00040709152,0.000027729073,0.0011021002,0.000025457126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022592549,0.000070386166,0.0019001098,0.000009276153,0.00015009417,3.715499e-7,0.0046995245,0.000024057455,0.015067302,0.91966784,0.00011192728,0.05827652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010787748,0.00031038458,0.018269436,0.000076160984,0.00013333852,0.00011998308,0.037447035,0.00034910944,0.0023314385,0.8909735,0.048387833,0.00052299077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139445765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057753526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030731197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028251007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99262166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398860631","doi":"10.1016/s0849-5831(16)30112-4","title":"Tribute and Tributaries","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal SOGC","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tributary; Tribute; Medicine; Geography; Archaeology; Cartography","score_opus":0.012320561224487858,"score_gpt":0.30879041910313865,"score_spread":0.29646985787865077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398860631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71602863,0.0006235922,0.00027135777,0.09577776,0.00013425128,0.00012759455,0.00001510977,0.000052654403,0.18696904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9690451,0.002030109,0.00032541403,0.0003889642,0.0006592939,0.0000027590254,7.834605e-7,0.0000035605442,0.027543996],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954,0.000038128608,0.00009365832,0.00005170619,0.0001314936,0.00014501436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997389,0.00003656665,0.000028620365,0.000040036055,0.000029415678,0.00012648923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034439896,0.000032231535,0.000056236877,0.000012308399,0.00092625146,0.00019082187,0.00008364468,0.00003194846,0.0013762593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000398261,0.000026324302,0.000028686694,0.000086614724,0.00009381712,0.00016111502,0.00000764025,0.00012266956,0.000078386256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040776493,0.00010424711,0.0047655874,0.0000037555483,0.000039334493,0.000022644714,0.0135879945,0.000020989315,0.00014505655,0.21463656,0.07878934,0.6878437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011012686,0.000009273557,0.003520907,0.0000025847646,0.000005248016,0.000010378619,0.000364978,0.0000068925847,0.000012235785,0.016630614,0.97928804,0.000038722115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003003947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026482425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9004987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029626954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006765189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2399699454","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511546471.018","title":"REFERENCES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.08284163801129249,"score_gpt":0.2794754871324653,"score_spread":0.1966338491211728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2399699454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033705837,0.0000715754,0.00020528848,0.00007889411,0.00013908636,0.00028687925,0.00012704212,0.0001547014,0.9989028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020302918,0.00024803315,0.00010822048,0.00007531431,0.00031858726,4.0269578e-7,0.000020623538,0.000017357745,0.9971812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989234,0.000026845408,0.00012327598,0.00032370424,0.00033178064,0.00027096027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910563,0.000076134565,0.00014895877,0.00031355995,0.0001510882,0.00020462114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021108733,0.00017331714,0.00019296024,0.00009970319,0.00065623445,0.000059374157,0.00058007793,0.00036534164,0.000028957116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010032582,0.0002055933,0.00013614236,0.000009794524,0.0005035737,0.000070584974,0.00017916263,0.00035357845,0.00006961888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009066922,0.0000037181564,0.0000010867955,0.0000080396185,0.000025433812,0.000029488901,0.00018547128,1.4704268e-7,0.000002047124,0.9744944,0.022557288,0.0026838253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096789234,0.000009462889,0.000009376577,0.000035807072,0.00006138609,5.795737e-7,0.00020606963,0.0000014338341,0.00001520305,0.00008198961,0.9992414,0.00024049183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029619576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002804475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021410668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023938612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83838516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2400367739","doi":"10.7202/1038707ar","title":"Fiduciary Duties, Conflict of Interest, and Proper Exercise of Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Discretion; Conflict of interest; Duty; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Defeasible estate; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.16717484330532556,"score_gpt":0.3585139573750075,"score_spread":0.19133911406968196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2400367739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23822403,0.00043993726,0.000013871914,0.0036429921,0.00020772673,0.00025547197,0.000054762328,0.000009544887,0.75715166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862194,0.00052285125,0.0002132674,0.000028033148,0.00006568118,0.0000027661774,2.5016044e-7,0.000003601354,0.00054163433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948364,0.000027455862,0.00018414407,0.00006760888,0.0001284837,0.00010868762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939364,0.000015834974,0.00024472683,0.0001596192,0.00009954786,0.00008663723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042095143,0.00004399238,0.00011976075,0.000014931579,0.0022964366,0.000057128764,0.00025950006,0.000034151988,0.00011946577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038870246,0.000033839704,0.00004069834,0.000016638922,0.0004119126,0.0001807835,0.000087126704,0.000101856735,0.0000025659367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017399278,0.00006764623,0.0008266331,0.000017333146,0.000017640841,0.000002527857,0.0011197074,0.0000012857602,0.00040309358,0.983586,0.0003299157,0.013610815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002643169,0.000039407023,0.0036882549,0.0001238449,0.00002301976,0.0000056599356,0.0007783762,0.000007058693,0.0042095296,0.0027022194,0.9880882,0.00007009369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00578844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066907713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019712867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016393564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406705625","doi":"10.14288/1.0093239","title":"The principle of compensation in relation to public interference in the real property market : an interface of law and economics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real property; Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Economics; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Law; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.020750402275633607,"score_gpt":0.24251927970657164,"score_spread":0.22176887743093804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406705625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790798,0.0000032684118,0.00004726985,0.00080864545,0.000021201322,0.000278266,0.000016282904,0.0000040448167,0.019741246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996072,0.00005801927,0.00015538547,0.000013262253,0.000005600989,9.4358444e-7,0.0000017031424,0.0000017395098,0.00015614054],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995286,0.00010505571,0.000106941334,0.00011157413,0.0000661686,0.000081651095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957365,0.00007945495,0.000093183575,0.00014518538,0.00007738411,0.00003115887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079190225,0.000015350222,0.00007641191,0.000017715987,0.00017704295,0.00006262045,0.0003113336,0.00004311058,0.000013626076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004736932,0.000027066446,0.000014361566,0.00013847472,0.0003638655,0.00029126968,0.00007712282,0.00009833647,4.5532505e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008005761,0.00055426266,0.33080405,0.00006670532,0.000019596031,0.0000024338694,0.049349356,0.00007124155,0.0021732177,0.11322695,0.00021803525,0.50343406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014292625,0.000029506286,0.9888985,0.000018756187,0.0000020789814,5.3793866e-7,0.0052397447,0.00056554447,0.0000012011196,0.0010267386,0.0040397095,0.000034711364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34265667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9710619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65809447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030929554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006842035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66172063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408952470","doi":"","title":"'Anchored to the land': asserting and recognising Aboriginal jurisdiction in the Northwest Territories","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Argument (complex analysis); Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Business","score_opus":0.012626309957129609,"score_gpt":0.3143234003263392,"score_spread":0.3016970903692096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408952470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93432295,0.000026933161,0.00026541078,0.02524396,0.00008564556,0.00019747386,0.0000044775024,0.000027328262,0.039825805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985386,0.000013019763,0.0002691352,0.00026375888,0.0006461752,0.0000284651,0.000004248321,0.0000021064186,0.00023449707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995107,0.00005651329,0.00009334427,0.000089917216,0.00012705523,0.00012246943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997729,0.00009108577,0.00002303593,0.000072381976,0.000022425966,0.00001815969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005301563,0.000036017864,0.000035443354,0.000014934304,0.0006380086,0.00019414313,0.00011390311,0.000021642496,0.0000070622064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001878062,0.000019772871,0.000011159795,0.00022391368,0.00004339266,0.00009994093,0.00000927994,0.00006903718,0.0000053315903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049202404,0.000037542246,0.84217876,0.0000020250843,0.0000021420767,8.7471096e-7,0.015793676,0.000052508396,0.00007002508,0.12954803,0.0010971022,0.011212416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040164265,0.000005421272,0.43565348,0.0000038894505,0.0000028356958,4.0397885e-7,0.00258267,0.000038504666,0.000020928528,0.0013388916,0.56027615,0.00003668522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21411958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6358027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.559179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023077135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034097542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7911137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412051618","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v5n1p32","title":"The Strange Death of the Law Merchant","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1945478226554423,"score_gpt":0.4807368746640306,"score_spread":0.2861890520085883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412051618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021631751,0.00003821845,0.000049768525,0.11845796,0.00017014924,0.00019572178,0.000040704268,0.000009638978,0.8594061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803846,0.00009579472,0.000018881718,0.00010578881,0.00020675341,0.000027823913,3.4100782e-7,0.0000032485752,0.019156791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985369,0.00018376842,0.00010147627,0.00008988496,0.0009047983,0.00018317504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866426,0.00072403037,0.000027629549,0.00018328248,0.00036111,0.00003966871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015018553,0.000027240927,0.000030296243,0.000011310652,0.00089425873,0.000068749774,0.00095567136,0.00002646508,0.00018010795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017816844,0.000011535347,0.00004588437,0.00008908755,0.0009770269,0.00008445704,0.0001636602,0.000105793166,0.00007278702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004855233,0.000015426886,0.00025211537,4.4239522e-7,0.000008722561,1.6813304e-7,0.00025217736,2.4109082e-7,0.0012645568,0.9961746,0.00033555384,0.0016911536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059151393,0.000005383539,0.0012166006,0.000011632346,7.082646e-7,1.68653e-7,0.00019376287,0.000004335355,0.0020009312,0.105395116,0.89109385,0.000018338196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019070137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035602573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9587528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009096361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013367004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2413942910","doi":"","title":"The Test of Fundamentality in Anticipatory Breach Cases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Test (biology); Law; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Political science; Psychology; Damages; History","score_opus":0.01980872097524765,"score_gpt":0.3397365491974425,"score_spread":0.31992782822219484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2413942910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905438,0.0002806334,0.00002452028,0.00258731,0.000091738075,0.000082928265,0.0000028158595,0.0000068850622,0.006379372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821186,0.0009251564,0.000013605472,0.000025020514,0.00016327006,0.0000041910844,2.3659298e-7,0.0000037097573,0.0006529232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986791,0.00006683826,0.00017429524,0.00006657617,0.00018413932,0.00082906085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937904,0.000321852,0.00010013683,0.00010728366,0.000044849257,0.00004683278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028052242,0.00004216314,0.00006342299,0.000022101829,0.00058924186,0.000045667653,0.00027730476,0.000038278118,0.000022961682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003402417,0.00002999,0.000043461572,0.00014829745,0.0002470961,0.000085839754,0.000021481683,0.0010298871,0.0000064999117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005086296,0.000106199055,0.100202754,9.787253e-7,0.000009636158,9.3058964e-7,0.0009311703,7.7431747e-7,0.0022804558,0.8845033,0.000037606467,0.011921115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007634097,0.00022136417,0.15516628,0.000017628814,0.000033133765,0.00016477767,0.04512869,0.000041042043,0.0008175121,0.59485835,0.20249869,0.0002890942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005130892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21597032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28964493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022036329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018155262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7983362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415705895","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2724597","title":"EEtude Sur La Protection Possessoire (Study on the Protection of Possession)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022833009769364598,"score_gpt":0.2898711187837316,"score_spread":0.26703810901436703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415705895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761208,0.000052641928,0.0020221663,0.01171115,0.000075373544,0.0015290726,5.369067e-7,0.000035297413,0.008452945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709016,0.000108698456,0.0000059933864,0.000031215313,0.00022025799,0.00020620365,1.9440003e-7,0.000010079926,0.0023271835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981459,0.0004126602,0.00021157146,0.000129702,0.0003925015,0.0007076785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930614,0.0000777901,0.00021341191,0.000152046,0.00020204272,0.00004858639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002251076,0.00008474762,0.00009470781,0.000051407627,0.0010271962,0.0001312911,0.00028115982,0.00006491154,0.000078846635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000213031,0.000053689182,0.000071704024,0.00030357885,0.00008900363,0.00028427606,0.000024338917,0.0011839491,0.000050919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054476277,0.0011807883,0.0021845293,0.000006872018,0.00015499482,7.224436e-7,0.006491559,0.00008475439,0.00904456,0.90467346,0.00024594853,0.07587733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019361433,0.003143509,0.08112425,0.00014843667,0.00011715192,0.00011442793,0.15580551,0.00040758555,0.0021304507,0.70682806,0.04754651,0.0006979809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009353096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050462843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19784543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003958608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001226362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24333709","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.044","title":"Sudbury Valley Trustees","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hazardous Materials","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.020616029590453982,"score_gpt":0.3183758545343567,"score_spread":0.2977598249439027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24333709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571899,0.00019283459,0.00011489278,0.010395547,0.0006564964,0.000114313574,0.0000075773,0.000026547157,0.031301856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961233,0.00025512476,0.0006975165,0.00040236826,0.0012338443,9.547911e-7,5.314909e-7,0.000004971915,0.001281401],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989493,0.00011159711,0.00038745927,0.00006529374,0.00030239768,0.00018393937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992797,0.000039368944,0.0003206104,0.00009924416,0.00015040171,0.00011068957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010354173,0.00006470819,0.00020672435,0.000053718646,0.00022480988,0.00017994778,0.00027929497,0.00006119626,0.00068379036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012248644,0.000051242157,0.00007898078,0.00006785252,0.00005429879,0.00021328083,0.000012918954,0.00006781339,0.00005351598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026449226,0.0005973344,0.0004932031,0.000027967257,0.00011091832,0.00014535994,0.016257128,0.00008074499,0.4468741,0.43955407,0.064262345,0.03133233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005711068,0.0002489267,0.0072134957,0.000056473422,0.0000524067,0.0000775332,0.0014708021,8.4048537e-7,0.026466757,0.029057093,0.93457395,0.00021064447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013185747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032278767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87031156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005425415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016179003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74870247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2442701321","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttw062","title":"New Czech Foundation and Trust (like) Law: initial experience and reactions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Czech; Personality; Foundation (evidence); Work (physics); Flexibility (engineering); Trust law; Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.03584434159582275,"score_gpt":0.34826614709379006,"score_spread":0.31242180549796733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2442701321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82934624,0.00014379501,0.002988829,0.010163461,0.0003822804,0.0005103649,0.000014341644,0.00025490238,0.1561958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893799,0.00028614496,0.001077892,0.00019685288,0.0003708745,0.000038354476,0.0000019101647,0.0000106142215,0.008637458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902695,0.000056953544,0.00018545697,0.00028038735,0.00020635044,0.00024390388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993555,0.00013548203,0.0000728436,0.0001748629,0.00004591245,0.00021538443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018316574,0.00010606913,0.00011399962,0.00004149208,0.0007889685,0.0001778881,0.00013328213,0.00008969115,0.0006178076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007733301,0.00008180159,0.000025885302,0.00011793979,0.00043466443,0.0006639584,0.000059371992,0.00007065554,0.0000631956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016738333,0.000022471868,0.0032010956,0.0000057415928,0.000008724665,0.0000012276238,0.0097484,3.0805302e-7,0.0013630091,0.8738605,0.00048569977,0.11128609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005973648,0.0000365796,0.016877515,0.000032767646,0.000021541582,0.0000073000447,0.002964033,0.000016010184,0.00065481145,0.017411966,0.96114546,0.00023462546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006866441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031677443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9606598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059230104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010754571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W244601112","doi":"","title":"Corporate Gatekeeper Liability in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Limited liability partnership; Liability; Statute; Law; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Business; Misconduct; Legal liability; Political science","score_opus":0.02630663196901786,"score_gpt":0.27663704903401376,"score_spread":0.2503304170649959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W244601112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.824381,0.00004802577,0.000054362285,0.0020845276,0.00018344352,0.0002240494,0.00001299473,0.000035011835,0.1729766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959354,0.000010728504,0.00025902953,0.0010759407,0.0001752087,0.000014591094,0.0000042197,0.000006954103,0.0025179712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987799,0.00006607,0.00023723605,0.00021900814,0.0002979483,0.00039987033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922186,0.00010892309,0.000082165396,0.00024371411,0.0000670507,0.00027627323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009979284,0.00007735748,0.00011309087,0.000017836857,0.00030910986,0.00005089507,0.00025982835,0.00005736732,0.0005620292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115869625,0.00007826557,0.000029635336,0.00034700555,0.00013556957,0.00015269882,0.0000411548,0.00021066982,0.0001452678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001029831,0.000050662107,0.21612975,0.000006419155,0.0000042028814,0.000018046121,0.00055432564,0.000054043434,0.00016420854,0.7797523,0.0018852479,0.0013705017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018586815,0.00000574563,0.172069,0.0000083254035,0.0000031155032,2.6832615e-7,0.001360204,0.000016650329,0.00035104094,0.011075239,0.81475306,0.00017149078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99399394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8128678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008088493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013390534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61538255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467947037","doi":"","title":"L’Autonomie Gouvernementale Autochtone Et L’Option De Loi En Matière De Statut Personnel (Indigenous Self-Government and Choice of Personal Law in Canada)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.007297523862702814,"score_gpt":0.2478052367207992,"score_spread":0.24050771285809638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467947037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97965413,0.0019267803,0.001752712,0.0062144757,0.00009686699,0.00024170095,0.000058369977,0.000007643654,0.010047339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99241805,0.0033952275,0.0004199536,0.00037839313,0.00028801942,0.000009499322,0.0000028110408,0.00001670156,0.0030713505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695957,0.00032368285,0.00031134623,0.00019567502,0.00052141305,0.0016882989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931747,0.00015093865,0.00024109993,0.00008339523,0.000033563505,0.00017351245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002304666,0.00015359749,0.00020422506,0.000023922597,0.0004580411,0.00006146214,0.00023365025,0.00009848861,0.00007033082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029865756,0.0001682267,0.000060993552,0.00012792011,0.0001259641,0.00023467917,0.000047300317,0.0010597218,0.000003613847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023713475,0.00026173485,0.02132372,0.00006018656,0.00014908874,0.0000024320898,0.040804956,0.0003186478,0.0007974658,0.9256727,0.000059209207,0.010526139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005800877,0.001380838,0.12662336,0.00038022612,0.0005952978,0.0004469655,0.37761927,0.037926953,0.0007808573,0.09922911,0.34772247,0.0014937731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92831445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99271953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8264436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025820583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016607298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468198089","doi":"","title":"Revisiting The Natural Contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ctheory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural studies; Critical theory; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Social contract; Philosophy and economics; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Anthropology; Philosophy; Geography; Politics; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.011283486555588524,"score_gpt":0.29643376415351547,"score_spread":0.28515027759792694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468198089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18809067,0.0009214045,0.00019299175,0.01845652,0.00014590716,0.00016450191,0.0000025821214,0.00008670233,0.7919387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99320203,0.000008818262,0.000039611103,0.00037242202,0.0012385813,0.000007497805,0.000001324489,0.000002715933,0.0051270225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960357,0.00007175711,0.00006259735,0.000060525745,0.00008504579,0.00011652976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996475,0.00019244681,0.00003014721,0.00009045552,0.000023999663,0.000015432186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051255204,0.00002711047,0.00003251121,0.000005240138,0.0005865074,0.00006015864,0.00014437355,0.000018067136,0.00011704463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071216746,0.000017635246,0.00003177065,0.000074022326,0.00014004263,0.000054170563,0.0000140360025,0.00007992447,0.00009243599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.259056e-7,0.0000021991325,0.00030883207,5.047109e-7,8.812808e-7,3.0692078e-7,0.0003521196,0.0000020205732,0.00015694763,0.9872236,0.00048097802,0.011470986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043601885,6.8446326e-7,0.012600745,0.0000043509954,0.000004012481,3.835155e-7,0.00077391986,0.000037147325,0.000064135864,0.04990074,0.93652344,0.00004684162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001212778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000203995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93732285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019658315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031557727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45109996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469737835","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-27256-6_4","title":"Les effets exercés par les crises financières sur la force obligatoire des contrats: certitudes et incertitudes du droit québécois en matière d’imprévision","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Law; Political science; Duty; Legislature; Civil code; Faith; Good faith; Morality; Humanities; Code (set theory); Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Legislation; Theology","score_opus":0.04066149223219637,"score_gpt":0.3068616005902412,"score_spread":0.26620010835804486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469737835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13404134,0.012905214,0.0013392741,0.0066874004,0.00091880304,0.0015378328,0.0006529797,0.00041805403,0.8414991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8966576,0.00695924,0.00058521645,0.00020491042,0.00086908153,0.00019276605,0.000057664427,0.000114212475,0.094359346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954597,0.0004629692,0.0011207818,0.0010923763,0.0009091642,0.0009550415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519575,0.0023735368,0.0006860597,0.00078568334,0.00053221383,0.000426731],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083582295,0.0010003782,0.0012903874,0.00017700822,0.002459692,0.00055098784,0.0014408472,0.001001829,0.0011594634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030458922,0.000851427,0.00056543364,0.00019294838,0.0033307145,0.00091015897,0.00045596177,0.0008660788,0.00062580564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007660609,0.00025351136,0.0041290997,0.00028091774,0.00018285261,0.000040368282,0.0034927505,0.00006397794,0.00053210254,0.95293576,0.009182623,0.028829431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079024024,0.00016066167,0.02784205,0.0025743686,0.00022215937,0.000021058064,0.00044803476,0.00012953702,0.00043389807,0.07598562,0.89017993,0.0012124666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066997856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12633762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061451644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068170624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469780603","doi":"","title":"The Economic Characteristics of Indigenous Property Rights: A Canadian Case Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Property rights; Political science; Supreme court; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Prosperity; Context (archaeology); Law; Human rights; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.017211597394762978,"score_gpt":0.23858792934971168,"score_spread":0.2213763319549487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469780603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898235,0.00000829123,0.000024935463,0.0019390513,0.000061792656,0.0004551516,0.0001051309,0.000011366102,0.00757075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99441403,0.000030132092,0.000047795365,0.000010065656,0.00004982876,8.594371e-7,7.809048e-7,0.0000028466286,0.005443662],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945265,0.000070515714,0.00009616669,0.000117517106,0.000092343325,0.00017080635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993693,0.00009938896,0.00012140896,0.00019761699,0.00007389092,0.00013837032],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002757676,0.000047719754,0.00010604918,0.000049371185,0.0013085037,0.000015435944,0.00034522975,0.00004565517,0.00011391868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000142764175,0.000029733663,0.000042555665,0.00009460654,0.00030458477,0.0001139786,0.000051404866,0.000043349777,0.000042159678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015137035,0.0009513596,0.20111081,0.0000373321,0.0004962412,0.0015033991,0.35026947,0.000009137109,0.00032179916,0.11711831,0.005403548,0.32262722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006377545,0.00016467783,0.049386546,0.000018179642,0.000055814224,0.000014691436,0.06806618,0.000029065463,0.000011324988,0.0007640289,0.88066876,0.00018298927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86165255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96885574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028608175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010136912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470189855","doi":"10.7202/1058698ar","title":"The Eve Decision — A Common Law Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Supreme court; Law; Legislation; Jurisdiction; Political science; Sterilization (economics); Scope (computer science); Business","score_opus":0.013430078905271757,"score_gpt":0.2984838862270745,"score_spread":0.28505380732180274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470189855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42542267,0.00012947244,0.00008350256,0.005960733,0.000088429115,0.00028957624,0.000004380821,0.0000455353,0.5679757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993141,0.00011432808,0.00013232243,0.00030598862,0.00021481355,0.000026295038,0.000001213306,0.000007859149,0.0060561933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992855,0.000055615943,0.00010590061,0.00015543864,0.00015504935,0.00024250563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991784,0.00033512546,0.000050448347,0.00028647436,0.00007138295,0.00007814423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043980088,0.000041892385,0.00008524015,0.000011446,0.0006650315,0.0001188615,0.00034544562,0.000058463353,0.00008656105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058185306,0.000044325134,0.00007348883,0.00016758515,0.0001314142,0.00009812383,0.000052491432,0.0001360604,0.00069388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005559385,0.000014745515,0.0015378863,0.0000014157927,0.000004675866,9.4410075e-7,0.0037869231,0.000012455624,0.000053285035,0.9928054,0.00041964964,0.0013570554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001448053,0.000016800745,0.006361797,0.000025092291,0.000009012946,0.0000028034306,0.007300835,0.00021896743,0.00004393353,0.676711,0.3090531,0.00011184392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036016558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070794714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5677183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031653154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006806475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89186555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472984480","doi":"","title":"Cultural Thin Skulls","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Context (archaeology); Harm; Law; Narrative; Liability; Government (linguistics); Compensation (psychology); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; History; Social psychology","score_opus":0.014071415843022997,"score_gpt":0.32125186859033567,"score_spread":0.30718045274731265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472984480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51723593,0.0034335726,0.0046390183,0.09930167,0.0003468037,0.00034500286,0.0000030267129,0.00020518662,0.37448978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98469114,0.0026880035,0.00009958931,0.00043726634,0.0007063133,0.0000013067538,9.028891e-7,0.0000034837797,0.011371993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981313,0.00006149674,0.00012713826,0.00009253799,0.00023575353,0.0013518159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967974,0.000016082178,0.00006730775,0.000075998396,0.00006638375,0.00009450454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001109725,0.00006067934,0.00006982766,0.000024688026,0.0008229691,0.00013033964,0.00029014732,0.000049102855,0.000067985355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051052895,0.0000483921,0.000075985066,0.00016302407,0.000053070104,0.00025490232,0.000008552561,0.00088233815,0.00011066696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026670768,0.00002259878,0.00007515764,1.1262153e-7,0.000008103293,4.718833e-7,0.0012513852,0.000007749346,0.00012910886,0.978767,0.0005981242,0.019137558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016523284,0.00007311187,0.00074803457,0.0000034331013,0.000009755532,0.00003175261,0.007417447,0.0000138597625,0.000027604081,0.6823645,0.30904165,0.0001035837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036560508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023826063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4674552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005489547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013115514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6329696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474455555","doi":"","title":"'Lon Fuller's Legal Structuralism' from Standing Tall","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Principle of legality; Naturalism; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Law; Structuralism (philosophy of science); Reading (process); Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.016740489708908454,"score_gpt":0.3005492305789906,"score_spread":0.2838087408700821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474455555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681859,0.0022045413,0.0030270112,0.0038770016,0.0004868017,0.00011857309,0.000012302933,0.000055423105,0.02203242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99383336,0.0010563694,0.00013720743,0.00010093325,0.0023852154,0.0000036407157,0.0000054162183,0.000012746891,0.002465136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997125,0.00010473044,0.00018313873,0.00011522471,0.00035580553,0.0021160697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946404,0.00005009916,0.00012451317,0.00011196069,0.00004553097,0.00020383277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012314705,0.00009847298,0.0001109072,0.000040100582,0.0009803058,0.000172239,0.0003152901,0.000074426694,0.00033509897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048271508,0.00008568248,0.00008919514,0.00014936682,0.00007955194,0.0006548484,0.000037357182,0.0010312194,0.00006651079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008266574,0.00001899479,0.0023020254,4.202804e-7,0.000044987537,4.300089e-7,0.002504985,0.0000057821812,0.00043135358,0.9877812,0.00018669888,0.006714815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046541868,0.000053202035,0.003944895,0.000011302826,0.00005366054,0.000042456755,0.026159534,0.000020299354,0.00015820008,0.30860096,0.660164,0.00032608645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005292047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010521269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67918026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011337113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010807788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8000027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475854966","doi":"10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195390315.003.0003","title":"A Theory in Flux","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral rights; Tort; Political science; Law; Doctrine; Law and economics; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Compensation (psychology); Sociology; Intellectual property; Liability; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04465614926603625,"score_gpt":0.24266179554547998,"score_spread":0.19800564627944373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475854966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003385636,0.000030037036,0.00011839432,0.000025621452,0.00005631989,0.00030138373,0.000041939562,0.00006988998,0.99932253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004764314,0.00018706953,0.000070221984,0.00004042705,0.000076827244,0.0000010529756,0.000007688645,0.000015173865,0.9948372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992472,0.00004924201,0.00009617678,0.00024279511,0.0001584635,0.00020610742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994376,0.00005712683,0.000096916294,0.00025991548,0.000046235287,0.000102214086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020956958,0.00013288898,0.0001613476,0.000092150796,0.0002735253,0.000024233166,0.0005044148,0.00028466887,0.00032810488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006598243,0.00015640452,0.00010114762,0.000007980582,0.0003198834,0.00006820632,0.00018974609,0.0002930939,0.000007914167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020427615,0.000006914324,0.0000032070202,0.000006074473,0.000015873944,0.000019260784,0.0024004932,2.7833406e-7,9.3386245e-7,0.99150187,0.0005524453,0.0054722154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001259756,0.000007699838,0.0000133955555,0.00003325193,0.00003087624,2.0791259e-7,0.00016102732,5.818363e-7,0.0000047115373,0.05101163,0.9484432,0.00016749221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011117859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016727569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9478907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015391945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016496917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63779914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479612070","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139059688.014","title":"INVASION OF CANADA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; World Wide Web; Telecommunications; Internet privacy; Computer network; Mathematics","score_opus":0.033534117680876295,"score_gpt":0.2176090116891259,"score_spread":0.18407489400824958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479612070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015039972,0.00010485605,0.000028231161,0.000069490336,0.00011312612,0.00021849702,0.00020866077,0.00002569257,0.9990811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02396042,0.0001175856,0.000026526277,0.000032382253,0.00013858898,2.6260815e-7,0.000013034746,0.000011464557,0.9756997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992213,0.000024031042,0.000104205596,0.00015793327,0.0002926748,0.00019980402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922293,0.000052747146,0.00016916648,0.00025076402,0.00012436873,0.00018000127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000107247695,0.0001134872,0.00017291166,0.00003740418,0.0003271789,0.000009661053,0.00036938055,0.00017002958,0.000018917637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008912427,0.00013626937,0.00007620489,0.000006024462,0.00022408213,0.00005003756,0.00016185037,0.0001779898,0.000003309352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051801494,0.000003096604,0.0000032048945,0.000016717193,0.000019924497,0.0000059017257,0.00013706491,3.7419326e-7,0.000013881722,0.95948356,0.03963637,0.0006747293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007520861,0.0000037390455,0.000022211243,0.000033177763,0.000053508124,2.9305056e-7,0.0001250447,9.3863633e-7,0.000117575066,0.000013704613,0.99941444,0.00014013509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57069165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1368923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003244075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010574608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87885714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479651440","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232420.003.0007","title":"Set-asides in the United States and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.054079834073586075,"score_gpt":0.3100973634414129,"score_spread":0.25601752936782685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479651440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027406663,0.000064419786,0.000007665879,0.0054710004,0.000020676225,0.00016626315,0.000027161685,0.000011053649,0.9914911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09017689,0.0012232448,0.000058089037,0.0051398985,0.00017242089,0.000008167575,0.00009424137,0.000012939666,0.9031141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994648,0.000013111408,0.00009970224,0.00009825287,0.00020192775,0.0001222202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959207,0.00020542898,0.00003456196,0.00009473892,0.000030304618,0.000042922646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028474987,0.000067451954,0.00006692186,0.00003919379,0.00020112841,0.000048005044,0.00015489924,0.0000703452,0.00024145772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011237728,0.000045062567,0.000011370531,0.000038669645,0.00012151436,0.000019655177,0.000022018208,0.00014459706,0.0000054349757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.8516387e-7,9.198765e-7,0.00006324048,0.0000018920371,0.0000029165312,0.0000037853586,0.001926934,0.000001863759,5.1962957e-8,0.98852307,0.009012822,0.0004620085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022286238,0.0000017479828,0.00021897675,0.000006379929,0.0000036585973,2.7157242e-7,0.0039174734,0.000005729241,3.8247904e-7,0.016504982,0.97925115,0.000066963425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007608775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002890132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26437926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481934234","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.002","title":"Reflections regarding the diversity of ways in which the trust has been received or adapted in civil law countries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10699567017993528,"score_gpt":0.28000112012308087,"score_spread":0.1730054499431456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481934234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010062092,0.00016142486,0.000061933846,0.000712594,0.00010907072,0.00073190033,0.00020114072,0.000045701905,0.99697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46964642,0.0005799543,0.000029187568,0.00009810349,0.0001367225,0.0000035806918,0.000012706221,0.000017205799,0.5294761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864686,0.00015733685,0.0002180234,0.00028455947,0.0003725933,0.00032062133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998618,0.0003649084,0.00026193014,0.00045688177,0.0002137907,0.00008446425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006685943,0.00019272417,0.0003010926,0.00010909503,0.0021637934,0.00006685743,0.0009414354,0.00029954626,0.000021990716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004742494,0.00014767077,0.00011456756,0.000079660276,0.0011715839,0.00017958214,0.00072229485,0.0006218148,0.0000053483304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096780575,0.000013281467,0.00009114119,0.000015406216,0.000054121763,0.0000063954535,0.0064858566,0.000011670545,0.0000052117903,0.99169344,0.001412608,0.00011406629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033854984,0.000013265771,0.00050804147,0.000098575474,0.00014865029,7.260431e-7,0.0013635056,0.000012573119,0.000020591671,0.00019391427,0.9971153,0.00018628489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044054702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11594743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045533484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002968796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482915259","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511610394.002","title":"Evolution and the Common Law: An Introduction","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020330339466685585,"score_gpt":0.23226274304935265,"score_spread":0.21193240358266707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482915259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025669523,0.000100435995,0.00013587438,0.0013766419,0.00010677787,0.00041704043,0.000051512598,0.00008559319,0.9974694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048352342,0.00012444821,0.00003136478,0.00008353799,0.0012102062,0.00000109022,0.000022210048,0.000011671419,0.9501631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992159,0.00009402331,0.0000937402,0.00026702008,0.0001855734,0.00014373656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933153,0.000045944675,0.00011762117,0.0003192722,0.00008557104,0.000100040605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026427582,0.00012412024,0.00015776609,0.00003532632,0.001092427,0.00007865489,0.0002924451,0.00018887826,0.0000054381494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000440731,0.00011646071,0.00006737916,0.000006359803,0.0012407575,0.00015792856,0.00013171573,0.00028256074,0.000006270117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003802275,0.0000043737864,5.8324423e-7,0.0000041984663,0.000015607258,0.0000014232622,0.0003461737,0.0000028267546,0.0000029298365,0.99297374,0.0055665094,0.0010436322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031737477,0.0000094328025,0.000014409398,0.000007367876,0.000097370415,0.0000016558633,0.00024298677,0.000051871255,0.0000044338713,0.0006010206,0.998515,0.00013707328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066215624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011684184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022504873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000650642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483794208","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579853.003.0004","title":"Property Rights Created under Statute in Common Law Legal Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Common law; Law; Legislature; Political science; Legislative intent; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.03531559398762169,"score_gpt":0.29794608716264204,"score_spread":0.26263049317502035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483794208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019569686,0.00005771417,0.000032389078,0.0013189167,0.00026634685,0.00082328287,0.000040188752,0.00013561547,0.99712986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17657891,0.00003306818,0.000059809878,0.00018760414,0.00026401767,0.00003567573,0.000043055516,0.000022458253,0.8227754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986155,0.000041557527,0.0003459176,0.00033238862,0.00037118574,0.00029343844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921244,0.000058091504,0.00012639123,0.00035135017,0.0001010417,0.00015069534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003087152,0.00020613131,0.00032463745,0.000059720503,0.0005418511,0.0002674333,0.00036989394,0.00053684117,0.0008961095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002253731,0.00012921356,0.00007729777,0.000046552716,0.00042275287,0.00018258354,0.00007058753,0.00066248403,0.0004228855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003552159,0.000020321851,0.000005661638,0.000008450697,0.000013331495,0.0000066667053,0.00022576758,0.0000048451066,0.000014382432,0.9986158,0.0010249149,0.0000562969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011184389,0.000010292711,0.00001287644,0.000051225645,0.0000140697775,0.0000010026189,0.0000645655,0.000018318473,0.000010649889,0.062897325,0.93657607,0.00023174996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25356373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53640705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017128531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023220896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9811771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487019157","doi":"10.4018/978-1-61520-615-5.ch005","title":"Trust, Loyalty, and ECommerce","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Fiduciary; Loyalty; Vitality; Curiosity; Institution; Business; Value (mathematics); E-commerce; Public relations; Marketing; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Duty; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.024314434281616004,"score_gpt":0.29902500509627333,"score_spread":0.27471057081465733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487019157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033784943,0.00012898543,0.000022062672,0.001175843,0.00022198346,0.00028977514,0.00013462402,0.00010135116,0.9975875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19494899,0.000048686637,0.0006269075,0.0011782355,0.0011337197,0.000020868933,0.000004321779,0.00003405183,0.8020042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989792,0.000013065431,0.00018298675,0.00031158043,0.00025576018,0.00025742277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926025,0.00003312992,0.00011409595,0.0002965396,0.00006173343,0.00023426842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015947498,0.00019128925,0.00021315027,0.000019694835,0.00050664484,0.00014421763,0.00031845074,0.0004717815,0.00022128673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016514068,0.00019188809,0.00009525299,0.000010176004,0.00042272446,0.000033069107,0.000150832,0.0003761201,0.0002599023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002130408,0.0000031891502,0.000030909112,0.0000049640385,0.000011973452,0.0000029630546,0.00020535695,3.5063255e-8,0.000004528647,0.9902943,0.0016852423,0.007754433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056784353,0.0000071761815,0.000052337462,0.00001278362,0.000021015509,0.0000019721758,0.000023130002,6.254598e-7,0.0000024960727,0.36424917,0.6354288,0.00014371124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021428533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008262629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6337436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095755684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022942424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7824969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488611260","doi":"10.29173/alr315","title":"Once More Unto the Breach: James v. British Columbia and Problems with the Duty of Care in Canadian Tort Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Tort; Duty; Common law; Liability; Statutory law; Duty of care; Appeal; English law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.013749291681109168,"score_gpt":0.2587432813250898,"score_spread":0.24499398964398061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488611260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21655422,0.18872197,4.9440933e-7,0.06343757,0.000035941004,0.003582946,0.00005246537,0.0000172649,0.5275971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97565305,0.019069145,0.000013376188,0.003547449,0.000023427956,0.00011103223,0.0000051149736,0.000006072147,0.0015713137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993033,0.00008535116,0.00013944333,0.00013696776,0.00013987346,0.00019507314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947,0.000109820154,0.000059175076,0.00020777527,0.000061500534,0.00009176142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023916955,0.00005010331,0.0001563671,0.0000024663188,0.00070438423,0.00008638294,0.00024653063,0.00002892851,0.00005691584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026517477,0.000038245445,0.00002970021,0.00021323544,0.00063515175,0.00010272266,0.000024764511,0.000089095265,0.000002907589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020934215,0.000052514624,0.07531489,0.0013437094,0.00004465238,0.000015441403,0.05270701,0.0000064952237,0.0000015773645,0.8374137,0.013707253,0.019390624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044948636,0.000010125531,0.008649424,0.000680716,0.000017535744,0.000010505831,0.0006751059,8.08803e-7,2.6136757e-7,0.00004676057,0.9898023,0.00006150551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99930084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006716403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036120604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54176253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489387897","doi":"10.1017/s1060150315000649","title":"JEKYLL AND HYDE, INC.: LIMITED LIABILITY, COMPANIFICATION, AND GOTHIC SUBJECTIVITY","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian Literature and Culture","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Limited liability; Power (physics); Law; Subjectivity; Liability; Parliament; Drama; Speculation; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Finance; Politics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.009456527145270328,"score_gpt":0.2628297726419514,"score_spread":0.25337324549668105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489387897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93367124,0.0063184756,0.00014558122,0.03286304,0.0003778814,0.00075465743,0.00025864146,0.00021552571,0.025394982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936419,0.0010975178,0.00013277621,0.00023945482,0.0006130882,0.00001915749,0.000016274591,0.000006893219,0.0042329356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991021,0.00011454387,0.00012568576,0.00033412085,0.0001420943,0.00018146525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993453,0.00007934205,0.000056237503,0.00017432269,0.00016044191,0.00018436457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027287676,0.00012588472,0.00013567232,0.00002789399,0.00057666923,0.00034824508,0.00009521107,0.00022198434,0.000019565781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010515997,0.000077848315,0.000021106976,0.0002596922,0.00026291292,0.00038101865,0.000050818533,0.00016350124,0.000005008317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029198407,0.00009937442,0.04790819,0.000069294576,0.000030734576,0.0000021434903,0.09780458,4.462438e-8,0.009396777,0.8330605,0.006256458,0.005342705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002492428,0.000025957743,0.035165958,0.000051934876,0.000014412561,0.0000033069477,0.000310481,0.0000030946699,0.000061102415,0.017324653,0.9466461,0.00014373698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000763234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005754378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9403897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002519353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032861193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44353318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2491522810","doi":"10.29173/alr166","title":"Compensation Where No Land Is Taken: Update of the Law in Alberta","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Nuisance; Compensation (psychology); Government (linguistics); Common law; Law; Population; Economics; Public use; Business; Public land; Public economics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01705568192229471,"score_gpt":0.30090799569150023,"score_spread":0.2838523137692055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2491522810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019410066,0.0031854215,0.0000010816811,0.10391103,0.00025981318,0.0010408475,0.000011060525,0.000009342685,0.87217134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97927856,0.0070089153,0.00007290063,0.008502515,0.00009727266,0.000045454442,0.00000792852,0.000009624123,0.004976821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991479,0.00010370464,0.00026729674,0.00015337834,0.00017374619,0.00015400621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991282,0.00020997196,0.00013957544,0.00040090785,0.000071065304,0.00005028078],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003577979,0.00007769867,0.00019306917,0.000005407059,0.00021753648,0.00002952676,0.00039443182,0.000062509425,0.0011485623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011090444,0.00005305312,0.00008546283,0.00023042868,0.0002331284,0.00013366308,0.00005917392,0.00016689248,0.00042428978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.0924805e-7,0.000024542474,0.0021914744,0.00012708869,0.0000040236882,4.8942812e-8,0.00039921585,1.6805713e-7,0.00003238215,0.99433553,0.002469181,0.00041575596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075506316,0.0000028545337,0.0006229569,0.00034848668,0.000018631652,4.0001322e-7,0.000008257431,0.000007628313,0.00003232145,0.0012995088,0.9975127,0.00007073883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3893256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.897853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013495929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055934615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493137966","doi":"10.29173/alr116","title":"The Law of Nuisance in Canada, Gregory S Pun &amp; Margaret I Hall (Markham, Ont: LexisNexis, 2010)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jungle; Nuisance; Law; Metaphor; Sociology; Common law; English law; Law and economics; Political science; History; Philosophy; Archaeology; Theology","score_opus":0.0376371735577754,"score_gpt":0.3053399698687162,"score_spread":0.2677027963109408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493137966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022954708,0.16549952,0.0000042998063,0.035299577,0.00038841958,0.00095361064,0.000018848286,0.000010864498,0.79552937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319324,0.053713344,0.00006902519,0.0052309064,0.00014967489,0.00012424053,0.000011983328,0.000014937445,0.008753478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984587,0.00026368606,0.0003846887,0.00015629648,0.00030291057,0.00043372103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849933,0.0006328755,0.00017657373,0.00048086548,0.00005903145,0.00015129842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010932083,0.00011376344,0.00027138626,0.000005634714,0.00039388373,0.000023291048,0.0005150574,0.000044753255,0.00041969225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001880614,0.000081626065,0.00007797516,0.00022986243,0.0002828749,0.00019953439,0.00007360029,0.00015365107,0.00010881395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013660847,0.000022520684,0.0014749444,0.00013228874,0.000007752085,1.5913207e-7,0.00036192263,2.283192e-7,0.0000020436014,0.9789408,0.016994836,0.0020611363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045345823,0.000001915951,0.0017210835,0.00036668452,0.000017847497,6.97017e-7,0.00006286702,6.858837e-7,0.0000061740866,0.0007813209,0.9968893,0.00010606371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97989446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000205715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043456504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45953357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493565389","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.008","title":"The securityfiduciein French law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024670168825995754,"score_gpt":0.22849679944435586,"score_spread":0.2038266306183601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493565389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000342081,0.00016543923,0.000036211743,0.00041585424,0.00019765669,0.00054874417,0.0001189779,0.00012290997,0.99836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00414363,0.00028415356,0.000028048049,0.00011846266,0.00033034384,0.0000028045629,0.000013724407,0.00002054107,0.9950583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882174,0.00005824105,0.00013349425,0.00032851068,0.0003373268,0.00032070678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987658,0.00015483992,0.0001580855,0.0005321318,0.00019435755,0.00019473222],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020071414,0.00019317401,0.00017595527,0.000029308825,0.0022194872,0.00021225984,0.0009310785,0.00029801362,0.000028245156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010268983,0.00017785696,0.00016832793,0.000008909561,0.001101611,0.00009955342,0.000314395,0.00042909902,0.00017146625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018519173,0.0000032111466,1.9679392e-7,0.000005493713,0.000029740466,0.0000071943014,0.00025113305,1.5828891e-7,0.0000021274382,0.90360063,0.095347166,0.0007511111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009529098,0.0000070767333,0.0000039807096,0.000022531518,0.000055826844,6.0297316e-7,0.00015510751,0.000005690753,0.000012222201,0.0005694165,0.99885124,0.00022098518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017743465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010600892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90350413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019554266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019680712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495502803","doi":"10.29173/alr384","title":"The Civil and Criminal Applications of the Identification Doctrine: Arguments for Harmonization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Tort; Corporation; Political science; Criminal law; Legislature; Plaintiff; Liability","score_opus":0.04534310154453545,"score_gpt":0.3491378639155135,"score_spread":0.303794762370978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495502803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00600224,0.20245668,0.034704085,0.31684324,0.00090466137,0.031880565,0.00012116906,0.00012697795,0.40696037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96660256,0.023872906,0.00015389462,0.0012932504,0.00013089413,0.0014789132,0.000020909089,0.000009899512,0.0064367685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933153,0.000072099974,0.00023759613,0.000108977154,0.00015671721,0.00009304848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990976,0.00021323418,0.00018534392,0.000263682,0.00019208893,0.000048076432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070958794,0.000045126515,0.000077217905,0.0000043193377,0.0006305479,0.000053478743,0.0002688975,0.000020867321,0.000006129416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029556724,0.000026973525,0.000042252523,0.00020788032,0.00018639238,0.00008856583,0.00003974422,0.00003237337,0.0000111581685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.728383e-7,0.000014274363,0.00007296443,0.00010699458,0.0000051284687,1.727146e-9,0.0003216098,6.21416e-7,0.000014332764,0.989263,0.0022611977,0.007939129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005896876,0.000003559064,0.00015220868,0.000072227835,0.000072617084,2.4874305e-7,0.00009276916,0.000021882934,0.000068276815,0.005746906,0.9936753,0.00003505288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027018352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008765391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99141407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024878464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070781636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48912936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496543964","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2016.1203499","title":"Judging gender in tort thresholds","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.0708364353783264,"score_gpt":0.36428694832983216,"score_spread":0.29345051295150576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496543964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012614538,0.051243063,0.00035140925,0.0394002,0.00023080404,0.001213976,0.000014062067,0.00016257861,0.8947694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448104,0.049128205,0.0001980503,0.003943619,0.00018785385,0.00009585817,0.0000012130163,0.000008859037,0.0016259799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917793,0.00006800286,0.00018840862,0.00016374746,0.00017798116,0.00022394548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995861,0.000047300095,0.00004781497,0.00021065216,0.000031624702,0.00007651625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064640975,0.00006242349,0.00014506161,0.0000113061915,0.00016480054,0.000020230875,0.00021172619,0.00003725366,0.0005222688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005208214,0.000039047933,0.000054212618,0.0002022177,0.00010121325,0.00015055941,0.00003773217,0.000054735145,0.000322365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9491525e-7,0.000012929169,0.0020193101,0.000074584226,0.0000020253513,0.0000011735887,0.00013879879,6.7535716e-8,0.000020057345,0.9802029,0.0018595791,0.01566824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006716381,0.0000020799007,0.002310383,0.0006145034,0.0000069668645,5.473152e-7,0.000011930526,1.8032796e-7,0.0000056600966,0.0041323183,0.99277014,0.0000781347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009823688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003224822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99091053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000680073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007011759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57184774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497077290","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834.004","title":"Promises and Contracts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.035064701219600314,"score_gpt":0.24134710661895353,"score_spread":0.20628240539935322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497077290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002085429,0.00013992569,0.000046031888,0.00015517071,0.000055838223,0.00044982453,0.000105222076,0.000100340454,0.9987391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058751097,0.0006617559,0.000033639735,0.0000647525,0.00018762719,8.308341e-7,0.000010383651,0.000015565627,0.99315035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992272,0.000023876742,0.00008770525,0.00028064428,0.00017972832,0.00020081125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993199,0.00006525218,0.00011367963,0.00020393121,0.000097367076,0.00019985877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009550938,0.00014932994,0.00018464404,0.00005018464,0.00054900977,0.00007426402,0.0002571572,0.00024103736,0.000010741595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012626067,0.0001769535,0.00007035435,0.0000052372025,0.00046732687,0.00008338088,0.00013819149,0.00022747775,0.000012194827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011303534,0.000004408213,0.0000028144666,0.000009245747,0.000026239059,0.000042696534,0.00016964931,1.08666384e-7,0.0000069240364,0.9864747,0.011463934,0.0017879972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020627574,0.000009398542,0.000026673843,0.000037906975,0.000079527366,0.0000021960777,0.0001060237,0.0000024932485,0.000011080647,0.00007087737,0.99924564,0.00020188013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017297519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009436536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9877817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010782427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015520718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7215954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498276595","doi":"10.29173/alr111","title":"Limits on the Operation of Exclusion Clauses","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Exclusion clause; Limit (mathematics); Liability; Raising (metalworking); Political science; Economics; Business; Contract management; Management","score_opus":0.07762358430294075,"score_gpt":0.36618732342403915,"score_spread":0.2885637391210984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498276595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012534065,0.024612512,0.000017579874,0.064822614,0.00013811632,0.00095334364,0.0000024539422,0.000015362995,0.89690393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699632,0.0226592,0.000023502473,0.005704958,0.00013215923,0.000042362157,0.0000028346096,0.0000038360013,0.0014679268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942,0.00012993331,0.00013280471,0.00006119478,0.00014396067,0.000112100584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935114,0.00032424662,0.00006105174,0.00018852808,0.000031799234,0.00004324036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005222458,0.000042432574,0.00008951332,0.0000035588198,0.00032947594,0.000013016747,0.0001572071,0.00002360444,0.00049655134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001911557,0.000024595502,0.00004559497,0.00010807585,0.00007734087,0.00012334804,0.00002322418,0.00004589877,0.00032214564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1268175e-7,0.000028399503,0.00009256414,0.000038948867,0.0000022680326,6.3692265e-9,0.00046090342,2.966776e-7,0.00003157592,0.99445134,0.0028098745,0.0020835213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014573773,0.000006311148,0.0002333399,0.0002800585,0.000015985712,1.1173058e-7,0.000028183844,0.0000013829087,0.00016648928,0.00020821084,0.99901044,0.00003490162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007202165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053647147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99620056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014431776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021486008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502130114","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511494956.011","title":"Insolvency of investment manager","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Investment (military); Business; Position (finance); Finance; Investment management; Financial services; Scheme (mathematics); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03320194137888519,"score_gpt":0.23985359134283085,"score_spread":0.20665164996394567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502130114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008226823,0.00011316664,0.00008359811,0.000108700304,0.000068906236,0.00038359646,0.00014039146,0.00006357154,0.9989558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032143139,0.00030927997,0.00017061045,0.00012025519,0.0001803906,8.473266e-7,0.000015178419,0.000016784346,0.99597234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990918,0.000028081,0.00015183006,0.00025917843,0.0002829499,0.00018616366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915045,0.00003400655,0.00020875882,0.00035240393,0.00011039483,0.00014395938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108656655,0.00015498487,0.00021870158,0.00009407034,0.00027277265,0.000020262669,0.0004928211,0.00022979986,0.000025175597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005646244,0.0001884177,0.00016045157,0.0000096241765,0.00045255915,0.000071471186,0.00021976905,0.00021219885,0.000024299728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006308532,0.0000108581435,0.0000013228145,0.000020651658,0.000043302804,0.000011089274,0.0002891208,0.000001081863,0.0000085843885,0.98096895,0.017285159,0.0013535724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014002172,0.000011130427,0.000017404005,0.000048598373,0.00009186782,2.755415e-7,0.00012131766,0.0000034103812,0.0000450551,0.00009437515,0.99924386,0.00018267799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015106654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076245946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021873273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018545733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7683451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502320974","doi":"10.29173/alr168","title":"The Law of Domicile: Re Foote Estate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Jurisdiction; Law; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Common law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02012465741582258,"score_gpt":0.33633626881922135,"score_spread":0.31621161140339876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502320974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002171057,0.0058594695,0.0000024412636,0.036972236,0.00015412222,0.0005058922,0.0000044304225,0.000013317274,0.95431703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8661307,0.11853797,0.00022478658,0.0051647164,0.00021362348,0.00010729296,0.0000059748745,0.00001617942,0.009598775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927753,0.00007521093,0.00022097805,0.00011213089,0.0001480231,0.00016613105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988956,0.00047283468,0.00011625185,0.00038251132,0.00006694619,0.000065878245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065532,0.000058990794,0.00014299262,0.0000023423563,0.0005868409,0.00003837133,0.00039026543,0.000036054967,0.00021457943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017964699,0.00003704898,0.00008616326,0.00013704826,0.00045790244,0.00007825582,0.000046860656,0.00013518526,0.00015210969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.979819e-7,0.000008148709,0.000008729553,0.000054430217,0.000004884839,7.476598e-8,0.00023069605,4.5649347e-8,0.000050996558,0.98913985,0.0016493166,0.008852352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034216246,0.000003896859,0.000013004642,0.00014602154,0.000022781804,3.3015382e-7,0.000027597496,0.0000012158645,0.00006218352,0.003584929,0.9960529,0.000050917504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0874071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42511073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007550951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054354114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91866994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502479164","doi":"10.1057/9781137562357_4","title":"Can Women Be Householders?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Aotearoa; Property (philosophy); Marital status; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Law; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.04047138215298013,"score_gpt":0.27162443801814573,"score_spread":0.2311530558651656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502479164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013782099,0.00012719522,0.000020070753,0.002310258,0.00023109363,0.00061125576,0.00050041516,0.00023161106,0.9958303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.797041,0.00021392578,0.000039588507,0.0006567718,0.00087155064,0.00009349419,0.000017229158,0.00007799897,0.20098844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775314,0.000040955045,0.0003488258,0.00054919074,0.00058736425,0.00072051573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983875,0.00012438741,0.00025553163,0.00066359463,0.000112299225,0.0004566817],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035618222,0.00037822232,0.00040426705,0.00012977167,0.000648732,0.0001188365,0.0006581681,0.00043324527,0.0016976626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029561192,0.0003236271,0.00021362855,0.000019520483,0.0006089499,8.512305e-7,0.00017040996,0.00028740364,0.00029302167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004933557,2.126351e-7,0.000016104272,0.00001032801,0.00005613527,0.00001086457,0.004476608,5.2010236e-8,0.000026243853,0.9860966,0.00012880744,0.009173082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001334956,0.000017532706,0.00001868874,0.000038559996,0.000019519925,0.0000010939045,0.00025253353,1.4058305e-7,0.000012072669,0.62047696,0.3787025,0.00032691302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000693207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038794742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7969032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046009614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041666738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504542205","doi":"10.29173/alr133","title":"&lt;i&gt;The Snail and the Ginger Beer: The Singular Case of&lt;/i&gt; Donoghue v Stevenson, Matthew Chapman (London: Wildy, Simmonds &amp; Hill, 2010)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Watson; Context (archaeology); History; Philosophy; Political science; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.03549541171765587,"score_gpt":0.28228039266319577,"score_spread":0.2467849809455399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504542205","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069483265,0.43986407,0.00010196724,0.1906377,0.00064739084,0.0063361563,0.00004889436,0.00010662744,0.29277396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90577686,0.072820224,0.00017344095,0.008908585,0.00030228065,0.000249622,0.000010251158,0.000047846337,0.011710912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762064,0.0007448164,0.00056453707,0.0003494075,0.0003161289,0.00040445928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715924,0.0010897625,0.0003681166,0.0011031636,0.00013924521,0.0001404444],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029444904,0.00023545107,0.00046322378,0.000015744225,0.0015778553,0.00010319652,0.00084883434,0.00009576854,0.0005580965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033043866,0.00011527788,0.0002522967,0.0004066287,0.0018748665,0.00018993723,0.00022828336,0.0002423678,0.00018205709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005995255,0.000043652668,0.00004027423,0.0001486768,0.000053378662,0.0000047328253,0.0065523707,3.1614402e-7,0.000026853644,0.98059076,0.0074109724,0.005121996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020853849,0.000012121075,0.00011109612,0.00034425876,0.0002618514,0.00007826918,0.00007998556,0.000015684755,0.000010701672,0.0034695093,0.99523324,0.00017477488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03345064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08130837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98782223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028928263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080212776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506600944","doi":"","title":"The 'Fusion' of Law and Equity?: A Canadian Perspective on the Substantive, Jurisdictional, or Non-Fusion of Legal and Equitable Matters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Equity (law); Law; Supreme court; Political science; Court of equity; Common law; Fiduciary; Constructive trust; Duty; Law and economics; Sociology; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.016581598221619996,"score_gpt":0.30533649936837537,"score_spread":0.2887549011467554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506600944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78909075,0.0012109845,0.00033404655,0.15246023,0.00010263743,0.0004197411,0.000038559705,0.000008501534,0.056334563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282503,0.0051302933,0.0000073416268,0.00030450436,0.00008142172,0.000005285451,1.441657e-7,0.000005729779,0.0016402756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858445,0.000086110675,0.000150385,0.00010988531,0.00026571954,0.0008034606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923027,0.00030287288,0.0001263232,0.00009743949,0.00014729126,0.00009581813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017870661,0.00006749983,0.000091214926,0.000040144278,0.0016277209,0.00006488238,0.00022441839,0.00003828471,0.000050277362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060028393,0.00003044832,0.00003760338,0.00013287301,0.00053193566,0.00014559792,0.000061318606,0.0003161743,0.0000024886265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042493655,0.000012619736,0.00011692756,8.423587e-7,0.000028850221,3.2122654e-7,0.0015006358,4.5257727e-7,0.0011443564,0.9954781,0.00025856588,0.0014158466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097072014,0.0005921987,0.0029001278,0.00013409606,0.00006713508,0.00005688819,0.06560196,0.000027102247,0.0007647593,0.7400867,0.18856975,0.00022857841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13704644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7076032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5705568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006656061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026391835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507533780","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783169.003.0014","title":"A Comparative Reflection from Canada—A Good Faith Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Tort; Statutory law; Law; Unfair dismissal; Common law; Faith; Political science; Damages; Labour law; Bad faith; Sociology; Law and economics; Liability","score_opus":0.057863781318367495,"score_gpt":0.339086548127969,"score_spread":0.2812227668096015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507533780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036243968,0.00010230622,0.00021568665,0.0055274796,0.00016783724,0.00029990776,0.00028421913,0.00006526068,0.99330103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14656451,0.000059368256,0.00011338008,0.00022759636,0.0007171128,0.000016344775,0.000013369815,0.000012685943,0.8522756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896276,0.000024290734,0.00014331205,0.00033276423,0.0003616336,0.00017526014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991904,0.0001228929,0.00013227653,0.00018555833,0.00024404217,0.00012481619],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006753053,0.00015463475,0.00022529095,0.000029267752,0.00048250947,0.000050341856,0.0002014854,0.000163626,0.0037083612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011058229,0.000119896664,0.00006634975,0.000028020879,0.00016171677,0.000077153294,0.00003908161,0.00019189737,0.0002720437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035501444,0.0000041733606,0.0000038054584,3.7050347e-7,0.000049509916,9.1724223e-7,0.0022729705,1.6568694e-7,0.000009554994,0.9851538,0.012240893,0.00026026941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006655039,0.0000122328365,0.000051453884,0.000019374784,0.000023058023,1.0759667e-7,0.0025631066,8.483149e-7,0.000020436793,0.1339777,0.8630894,0.00017576481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9562515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85117614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015130796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017287001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507763840","doi":"10.29173/alr49","title":"Corporate Foreign Corrupt Practices and Director Liability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Liability; Corporation; Business; Face (sociological concept); Jurisprudence; Corporate law; Law; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.07389278427639404,"score_gpt":0.3568242234808464,"score_spread":0.2829314392044524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507763840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01006474,0.011381779,0.000038934937,0.015949674,0.00007309312,0.00077212084,0.0000036880201,0.000040897008,0.96167505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619701,0.028128764,0.0003703509,0.0045752996,0.00019797092,0.00010957428,0.000007743155,0.000010524013,0.004629675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990362,0.00025824032,0.00018495375,0.00022565998,0.00013430948,0.00016063017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998337,0.00080169045,0.0003946589,0.00027395872,0.00006748476,0.0001252531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010681394,0.000077610646,0.00019551492,0.000004466371,0.00036460286,0.00007117068,0.0001667409,0.000038300244,0.00025118375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016077085,0.00006161887,0.000045275294,0.00014407672,0.00022962171,0.00023022182,0.00004545715,0.00007595666,0.00016200716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.5848527e-7,0.00001885929,0.0020697117,0.0002132928,0.0000041314443,7.469256e-8,0.00009310321,3.9416914e-8,0.0000042676843,0.99041325,0.0010100902,0.0061724237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003850284,0.000011170058,0.00065124827,0.00018594375,0.000041076197,6.6111414e-7,0.000014839,0.00001506214,0.0000057753455,0.0062119723,0.9927376,0.00008614289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03791321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035839178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99172753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018998398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004574254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98175424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508860223","doi":"10.7202/1040054ar","title":"Struggling Towards Coherence in Canadian Administrative Law? Recent Cases on Standard of Review and Reasonableness","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Administrative law; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); CLARITY; Context (archaeology); Rule of law; Standard of review; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10968278335432045,"score_gpt":0.40261673163454215,"score_spread":0.2929339482802217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508860223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02947534,0.002186195,0.0000026504226,0.01744755,0.00013243796,0.00041693298,0.00054195645,0.0000074629716,0.94978946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913757,0.008054052,0.00016407388,0.00029729528,0.000042276864,0.0000065660734,9.617323e-7,0.0000038064443,0.00005530959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991857,0.000085374515,0.00019305541,0.000110145294,0.00020179262,0.00022392249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916553,0.000046068526,0.00019401168,0.00014810888,0.0001714597,0.00027482735],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084858993,0.00006425698,0.00018012845,0.000017025684,0.0035180307,0.000107913904,0.00023361974,0.000038986902,0.0001466169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026779142,0.000055343244,0.000024082728,0.000050449402,0.00025642064,0.00018544824,0.000023471921,0.00017254973,0.000001519986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014417638,0.00001629149,0.00049866806,0.00003990521,0.000007599053,0.000044923272,0.00022574207,0.000002384831,0.0000023216244,0.9808571,0.000071585666,0.018219082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001453827,0.00008544362,0.0011935909,0.00061167806,0.000016840315,0.000017778168,0.0004753875,0.0000014143234,0.00020056468,0.0016398572,0.99552613,0.00008594343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6746251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98404145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99545455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021644065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002597031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509711261","doi":"","title":"Wonky Walden: The Dizzying New Personal Jurisdiction Rule","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal jurisdiction; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.022800502214303207,"score_gpt":0.28660894441633705,"score_spread":0.26380844220203387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509711261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37799466,0.00081359537,0.0039489167,0.18794213,0.0012011663,0.0008964699,0.00006272077,0.00058989844,0.42655042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528257,0.00009947034,0.0002274891,0.0010700636,0.0016571758,0.000035439607,0.000002213114,0.000012158525,0.04407025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888235,0.00008581572,0.00014590874,0.00021969336,0.000351716,0.00031452184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992951,0.0001345505,0.00006526163,0.00022276754,0.000050976756,0.00023134646],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041211015,0.000089667126,0.00008498758,0.000015297755,0.0013154676,0.00016877317,0.00034333701,0.00007746319,0.0014354235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009738571,0.000052901476,0.00007892813,0.00019301292,0.00022208171,0.00035348875,0.0000636791,0.0001469302,0.0013671631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009676332,0.000037946043,0.0027196351,0.0000023861087,0.00002026228,0.0000014516104,0.003659484,0.0000021382639,0.0021509882,0.9264481,0.040996797,0.023951126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019384136,0.000009480768,0.0035663224,0.00001824814,0.000011081009,9.1250325e-7,0.000686181,0.000006302789,0.00023132174,0.009309247,0.9858601,0.00010697198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008647984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006875217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9448633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012910861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021555877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510821039","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n7p219","title":"Attribution of Liability among Multiple Tortfeasors under Negligence Law: Causation in Iran and England","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Tort; Joint and several liability; Liability; Law; Attribution; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Strict liability; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Public law; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03377915531114129,"score_gpt":0.3104368393400408,"score_spread":0.2766576840288995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510821039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971412,0.00005736383,0.00040502433,0.0012751522,0.000042675834,0.000058266924,0.000013207785,0.0000017728765,0.0010053661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962044,0.000115316405,0.000071867784,0.000044368127,0.000095558775,6.9788575e-7,2.830145e-7,0.0000017132369,0.000049773877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945897,0.00005631894,0.00020789969,0.00005324437,0.000119377866,0.00010416962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994937,0.000158702,0.00012653062,0.00004585596,0.00008928901,0.000085922795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048376407,0.00003443316,0.00009028225,0.0000177905,0.00011235776,0.00002028139,0.000042275424,0.000044405773,0.00000607038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008200596,0.000023704813,0.000020445319,0.000041854106,0.0003317497,0.00018033327,0.0000136164335,0.000050411603,1.8402001e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028771942,0.000025664975,0.13447888,0.0000050686635,0.0000029207147,3.1995253e-7,0.0013552228,0.000003861539,0.00048035698,0.8634381,0.00000196599,0.00020474364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007070039,0.0000792126,0.89408207,0.00007548352,0.000016368562,0.0000017899641,0.0010639074,0.00004195413,0.0011201373,0.07522816,0.027503321,0.00008056766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010806577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020907605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058246445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000370386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99695826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511272172","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttw152","title":"Disputes over trusts that hold corporate structures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tellabs (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Accounting; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Corporate law; Law; Political science; Corporate governance; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.07366499281904929,"score_gpt":0.31689014255319004,"score_spread":0.24322514973414075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511272172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931156,0.00023367042,0.00024529253,0.0067367787,0.00051505695,0.0005004512,0.00010128863,0.00035663834,0.060154833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98470986,0.00022016956,0.00031454625,0.00037298002,0.00059171027,0.00005118115,0.0000062906124,0.000030285719,0.01370298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805635,0.00012658448,0.0002575615,0.00043544313,0.00054790435,0.00057616073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987024,0.00023791713,0.0002548194,0.00045692056,0.00007447172,0.0002734461],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003250728,0.00022808289,0.0002509431,0.00008183425,0.0006574487,0.00018848357,0.00059136533,0.00017513586,0.0024526375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011526455,0.00014928415,0.00013356796,0.00023932026,0.00055022823,0.0005201419,0.00011303616,0.00013340509,0.0002802765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003760151,0.00007378579,0.06796185,0.000014918221,0.00005155791,0.000010438938,0.0038252403,0.0000060745015,0.0020013524,0.8617322,0.009015314,0.05526966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010625973,0.000048063037,0.28767192,0.00005798002,0.000057395468,0.0000035202931,0.0014365851,0.000020717325,0.0029166464,0.08784022,0.61825335,0.0006309733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010945991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017038493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.773892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012422548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016372735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2511484456","doi":"","title":"Mind the Justificatory Gap: Fairness in Administrative Law through the Rule of Law as a Normative Exercise in Reviewing Regulated Conduct","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Jurisdiction; Normative; Political science; Legislature; Law; Enforcement; Law and economics; Action (physics); Administrative law; Judicial review; Economics","score_opus":0.07608987764947035,"score_gpt":0.35794748623236267,"score_spread":0.2818576085828923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2511484456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22575289,0.0030922187,0.000017685818,0.0034899379,0.0001256573,0.0013588715,0.000042157186,0.000014977438,0.7661056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99293935,0.00089400867,0.00013370173,0.000028234232,0.000019947069,0.000004930854,0.00005374287,0.000008028573,0.005918053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986928,0.00034532382,0.00021569984,0.00023980536,0.00031307605,0.00019330278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869454,0.00020553783,0.00053179334,0.00034974446,0.00017676083,0.000041600626],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062668434,0.00015158032,0.00039928503,0.000018936971,0.0004938437,0.000021689,0.00070682453,0.00020564144,0.001069756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041188887,0.0001272495,0.00012319982,0.0001775241,0.00074503134,0.00044995896,0.00005116099,0.00025612797,0.000014880323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008018932,0.000057517107,0.000011329328,0.00014278715,0.00003112969,0.0000020503671,0.537065,0.000013042061,0.0000919758,0.4591092,0.00008415026,0.00331158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000502544,0.00004323984,0.016056618,0.0012184152,0.00024072242,2.4657126e-7,0.88561314,0.000030350508,0.00041319008,0.0018953115,0.093669,0.00031722093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66666055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79440767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76718646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024803332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030116015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512672195","doi":"10.1086/233437","title":"Book ReviewsPatricia Smith, .<i>Liberalism and Affirmative Obligation</i>. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Pp. 271. $49.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Obligation; Liberalism; Download; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.06357273097434996,"score_gpt":0.3112157524176009,"score_spread":0.24764302144325095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512672195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012059704,0.15434526,0.0010397328,0.20610757,0.00038076052,0.0025447633,0.00020711719,0.00066135504,0.6226537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036705527,0.5847309,0.005465966,0.02057376,0.0014370905,0.00002113957,0.000054807504,0.00005351627,0.35095727],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868125,0.00029134768,0.00018454953,0.00025135517,0.00034087364,0.00025060333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990817,0.00031495982,0.00011197798,0.00021882771,0.00006407942,0.00020849916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006599783,0.000119437216,0.00016317416,0.00001658217,0.0010597567,0.00011571876,0.00029533732,0.00023407265,0.00027928577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009860002,0.000120853576,0.00006397425,0.00032200824,0.00031737238,0.00039941387,0.00005857564,0.0005652789,0.00007757322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013978509,0.000047308316,0.00018776281,0.00005110602,0.0000238234,0.0000032483342,0.04452339,0.000048901362,0.0000061151995,0.27967247,0.6582324,0.017189538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017675609,0.000011808122,0.0003515477,0.00004584923,0.000031581483,6.2693823e-7,0.00067405245,0.000047820908,0.000014520781,0.0023699421,0.99612325,0.00015226133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009137531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008176776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43038565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008606801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046277212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513289806","doi":"10.29173/alr10","title":"Twelve Bottles of Whiskey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Certiorari; Political science; History; Supreme court","score_opus":0.020492149470864654,"score_gpt":0.32721678579358565,"score_spread":0.306724636322721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513289806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008496115,0.011239353,0.0000534733,0.01355479,0.000052878146,0.00028721258,0.0000019293761,0.000014718345,0.97394603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580577,0.030723004,0.000316317,0.00444046,0.00015844517,0.000046277208,0.0000059526333,0.00000931563,0.006242545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936455,0.00009796242,0.00017984625,0.000105219166,0.00013141031,0.000121023244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993417,0.00022846,0.0000871294,0.00023054343,0.000049065548,0.00006306418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004092809,0.000049378756,0.00017055505,0.000004850821,0.00015008409,0.000012005654,0.00021926484,0.00002752428,0.0004460127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023418422,0.00004025905,0.00007796914,0.00013756998,0.00014517273,0.0000702065,0.000028419654,0.0000411643,0.000290079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5215589e-7,0.000012298508,0.000098405275,0.00014658541,0.0000035277558,1.6425513e-8,0.00015717502,1.09221936e-7,0.000006959339,0.9911949,0.00306009,0.0053197485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000267941,0.0000058076353,0.00008925535,0.00034653387,0.000023490422,1.3398042e-7,0.000010593263,0.000002103733,0.000020848212,0.0024683722,0.9969543,0.00005172536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0328874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02775349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000103318625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030244477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9899875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513469022","doi":"10.29173/alr245","title":"&lt;i&gt;Rediscovering the Law of Negligence&lt;/i&gt;, Allan Beever","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.033783211853560986,"score_gpt":0.30123687760464624,"score_spread":0.26745366575108526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513469022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006381374,0.05012276,0.000027409687,0.013719341,0.0001498242,0.00089712103,0.0000120267505,0.000032923337,0.92865723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90003735,0.088822864,0.00010145411,0.0040788883,0.00022492644,0.00008879266,0.000008393177,0.00001637502,0.0066209324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859625,0.00013697734,0.00037320046,0.00022954462,0.00036480746,0.00029920522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987606,0.000382911,0.0001679363,0.00050183287,0.00007856793,0.000108150765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042943555,0.00012890135,0.00029495516,0.000007715482,0.0008468022,0.000030022144,0.00062165904,0.00005796298,0.00040670813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014590472,0.00008922154,0.00018282878,0.0003237658,0.0006556882,0.00020726954,0.000110356355,0.00010173129,0.00021045838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.200919e-7,0.000025530937,0.000049583687,0.00010128184,0.000016448146,8.73547e-7,0.0010777116,0.0000025908034,0.00015056517,0.99349546,0.004485188,0.00059404474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004692006,0.000009533115,0.00019370693,0.00036493439,0.000044509496,0.0000035755716,0.000020256468,0.000004256125,0.000057909958,0.00089867745,0.99823517,0.00012054614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022259526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07886899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036175166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011694321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516333285","doi":"10.5539/mas.v10n12p132","title":"Rationales and Applications of Mutuality of Obligations in Iranian Contract Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Applied Science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Lien; Economics","score_opus":0.02473129428048942,"score_gpt":0.31306739456853455,"score_spread":0.2883361002880451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516333285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65939975,0.00007806457,0.17832577,0.004379818,0.000025909725,0.0013669347,0.00010792872,0.000050523686,0.15626529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987563,0.000022060496,0.0009713781,0.000048442416,0.000020931753,0.000102989805,8.818786e-7,0.0000026447376,0.00007439957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901456,0.000020773445,0.0002443386,0.00021957037,0.00034015827,0.00016063108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993169,0.00019470236,0.00012075848,0.00019918285,0.0000917794,0.00007669949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088530005,0.00005028783,0.00010750576,0.0000745803,0.00032433833,0.000023217317,0.00030064507,0.00003437249,0.000017398055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051434203,0.000039655315,0.000017075852,0.0005187948,0.0022759275,0.00021587238,0.00004991457,0.00003677182,0.000004230177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020682733,0.00004043232,0.0014109663,0.0000031002287,8.2293747e-7,1.8839446e-8,0.0017319038,0.000005002282,0.1645788,0.82533604,0.0000015577782,0.006889293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010691214,0.000022414837,0.13398515,0.000054365726,0.00001629063,7.931814e-7,0.0021173134,0.0015695598,0.043028608,0.7988533,0.018926231,0.00035687382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011099972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032082412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3393565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004831364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025630207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83857495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251677888","doi":"","title":"Righting Past Wrongs Through Contextualization: Assessing Claims of Aboriginal Survivors of Historical and Institutional Abuses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Plaintiff; Tort; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology; Criminology; Liability","score_opus":0.019457208659973534,"score_gpt":0.33835523458238626,"score_spread":0.31889802592241273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251677888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81060547,0.0017579601,0.17469059,0.0008849131,0.00018787791,0.00009507405,0.0000020929365,0.000017420076,0.011758633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971769,0.0012962957,0.00077158195,0.000021631278,0.00040964823,0.0000010115292,0.0000016781438,0.0000058080545,0.00031545814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833006,0.00007100725,0.00039135176,0.00011787568,0.00037978034,0.00070993276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917835,0.00013821619,0.0003218039,0.00006326331,0.0002324377,0.00006592325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022366254,0.00007715867,0.00016079372,0.000059620797,0.00067397027,0.000039071958,0.00016031881,0.00007212461,0.000018679333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005439128,0.00006933912,0.000056693232,0.0003010486,0.0002963458,0.00043727417,0.000013509966,0.00046836052,8.2514885e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011155381,0.000054175274,0.018475724,0.0000057497145,0.000023591338,7.312486e-7,0.0023311477,0.000017638797,0.0003162829,0.97426665,0.00001784556,0.0044792956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016733537,0.00031985834,0.034293305,0.00018061773,0.00013602103,0.00019120579,0.041014224,0.0001021419,0.0008198422,0.36754408,0.55315584,0.0005695101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042876024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012098247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6067226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010500886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020730074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6751106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519043242","doi":"","title":"The Entrenchment of Discretion: Prospects for Judicial Appointment Reform after a Trio of References","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Discretion; Law; Political science; Principal (computer security); Milestone; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.011153762293667753,"score_gpt":0.2885464288425313,"score_spread":0.2773926665488635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519043242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6679846,0.009746885,0.0650141,0.16092943,0.0009859607,0.004485977,0.00013102873,0.00007308737,0.09064894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931723,0.0036542194,0.000054580883,0.000011972476,0.00024485672,0.00007595144,4.3541334e-7,0.0000027056562,0.0027830137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856985,0.000044205168,0.00027855436,0.000091837566,0.00029400026,0.0007215615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939734,0.00007507007,0.00025192718,0.000102755184,0.00012753494,0.00004538058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015104279,0.000059461454,0.00010570942,0.00002319684,0.0003760881,0.000021734206,0.00023707375,0.000033948818,0.00003835589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045236648,0.000028359425,0.00010499822,0.00009343783,0.00016896139,0.000088500645,0.000017712911,0.0001510694,0.000002584478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099936246,0.000043423453,0.00023593853,0.000002220325,0.00003838204,4.3641958e-8,0.0006834252,2.0989096e-7,0.00014456037,0.96229136,0.000023684705,0.03643681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008752462,0.0006708061,0.0010886377,0.0000631946,0.000047899033,0.0000035587336,0.0065701106,0.0000029547066,0.0011960777,0.8342188,0.15515216,0.00011056008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033354486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01007957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32518768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007993369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015497947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56246364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519302653","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2016.1223952","title":"The extent and intensity of insider trading enforcement – an international comparison","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Melbourne","keywords":"Sanctions; Insider trading; Enforcement; Statutory law; Business; Empirical research; Scope (computer science); Insider; Accounting; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.18649086852595417,"score_gpt":0.4004358778108935,"score_spread":0.21394500928493934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519302653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97889084,0.0006947599,0.00036459495,0.011646798,0.00044010617,0.00008636764,0.0000030885383,0.000005066926,0.007868382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975986,0.0018033893,0.00017972317,0.00007582427,0.00015321517,0.000001336856,7.299447e-8,0.0000019650809,0.0001858557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992845,0.000047325208,0.000305548,0.000049096667,0.00023630347,0.00007722713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863756,0.00015583134,0.000596551,0.000057252255,0.0005071002,0.000045686706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007248847,0.000043070624,0.00014419321,0.00001621472,0.0003583554,0.000034340264,0.00014386482,0.000014034689,0.000006733829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000908536,0.00002091952,0.000034289278,0.000041648855,0.0004764267,0.00023958774,0.000049211063,0.00005055211,5.5452904e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046803358,0.00004192166,0.012829974,0.000002531734,0.00013285286,0.0000013768945,0.0056459345,0.000005022549,0.0008892803,0.9736371,0.00061796047,0.00614923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011782276,0.00047868723,0.047305375,0.00023068917,0.00011192287,0.000014704382,0.052251317,0.00012346216,0.0035748926,0.19440359,0.70010996,0.00021718409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001318069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007775461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7792335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053706757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035232108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27562162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520832235","doi":"10.29173/alr151","title":"The Road to the Promised Land Runs Past &lt;i&gt;Conway&lt;/i&gt;: Administrative Tribunals and &lt;i&gt;Charter&lt;/i&gt; Remedies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Tribunal; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisprudence; Mandate; Statutory law; State (computer science); Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.04993976833985774,"score_gpt":0.3124187147228283,"score_spread":0.26247894638297053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520832235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021401552,0.12999411,0.0000583392,0.13244915,0.0006627391,0.009615637,0.00022123019,0.00018878796,0.70540845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8622079,0.09753156,0.00023412064,0.005854144,0.0009908744,0.0019981456,0.000049422964,0.000076365155,0.031057484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628127,0.0006800129,0.0008553591,0.0007100931,0.0006400572,0.0008331843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654865,0.0011817507,0.00043938358,0.0010368492,0.0003054559,0.0004879222],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022162504,0.00043957893,0.0007200442,0.00003036693,0.0024731355,0.00033118261,0.0012194877,0.00016179496,0.00049541116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090436265,0.0002599037,0.0002806691,0.0005934274,0.0009922038,0.0003386829,0.00025819006,0.0002598174,0.0005523305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036621423,0.00014641917,0.00012729313,0.00021702959,0.00015977955,0.000004327789,0.008976258,2.1040762e-7,0.0007834517,0.9453584,0.03105362,0.013136595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002780612,0.00013233685,0.0018604876,0.00074689876,0.00021022795,0.0000072060693,0.00011433108,0.0000064921073,0.000072769544,0.0012483695,0.99494535,0.0003774735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012435107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1353528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96389174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007499009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002999682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521174906","doi":"10.1515/ajle-2016-0015","title":"Assessing Personal Injury Liabilities in China from National to Provincial Level: An International Comparative Analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Personal injury; Damages; Convergence (economics); Mainland China; Civil law (Civil law); China; Compensation (psychology); Law; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Delict; Economics; Law and economics; Liability; Public law; Private law; Black letter law; Psychology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.06799291285301286,"score_gpt":0.3682331806633817,"score_spread":0.30024026781036883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521174906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95243144,0.0000041097087,0.00047309507,0.0054629957,0.00009859642,0.00004563379,0.0001351262,0.0000027851677,0.041346245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979232,0.000011400851,0.0013311249,0.0001846789,0.00046918556,0.000002043073,0.0000036331228,0.0000024434305,0.000072281786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993496,0.000057607467,0.0002686293,0.000113487346,0.00011131822,0.0000993469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995258,0.000063023836,0.0001559872,0.000037877784,0.00009858417,0.000118726515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005047689,0.000055112956,0.00015810227,0.000116115705,0.00014859792,0.00020708785,0.00016758853,0.00003585484,0.000113486436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004037684,0.00004437414,0.000059479076,0.000071651295,0.00012666614,0.0012528193,0.00002499771,0.0000694745,0.00000344379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006281962,0.00009722176,0.062450875,8.6388746e-7,0.0001758487,0.0000011406805,0.03317507,0.0000955115,0.00009467177,0.89550936,0.00004065222,0.0082959775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008877065,0.00014806204,0.7933322,0.00004876057,0.00009068052,0.0000038107694,0.024723945,0.00093228306,0.00016303842,0.08321494,0.09608563,0.00036895042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012000087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013977658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8122944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002179227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024907792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77998614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522008228","doi":"","title":"The Vulnerability Jurisdiction: Equity, Parens Patriae, and the Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Safeguarding; Law; Equity (law); Intervention (counseling); Jurisprudence; Autonomy; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction; Business; Law and economics; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.017336754512655914,"score_gpt":0.3134938404523928,"score_spread":0.2961570859397369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522008228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55303824,0.004566913,0.011830687,0.41053653,0.0015228947,0.0013644139,0.00002125115,0.00006361897,0.017055424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874869,0.010305681,0.000004430535,0.00006402772,0.00061793387,0.000022133276,1.1974754e-7,0.0000052817372,0.0014934689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997821,0.00055581593,0.00028466302,0.00012019323,0.00044043118,0.0007779429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988786,0.0004219412,0.00025789504,0.00025019192,0.00013744569,0.000053931944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006708448,0.000077246536,0.000103542516,0.0000122370075,0.0026739507,0.00009688401,0.00041341112,0.00005550931,0.000025285366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020471054,0.000027828863,0.00012695686,0.00017140848,0.0009366573,0.0001205113,0.00014127677,0.00069317734,0.000005586552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042551474,0.000023465898,0.0026783627,9.1983475e-7,0.00004303572,2.315063e-8,0.0010954083,0.0000021654441,0.00005185246,0.95487064,0.0006215614,0.040569983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083375344,0.000052765598,0.0057664127,0.000013392501,0.000053673968,0.000018006054,0.0033965544,0.000018547826,0.000040250834,0.8238737,0.1658659,0.00006703112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082739507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017049352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43444866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048634518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001869724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522855291","doi":"10.22329/il.v36i3.4721","title":"Defining Marriage: Classification, Interpretation, and Definitional Disputes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Epistemology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.028401602770812277,"score_gpt":0.3046576216162169,"score_spread":0.2762560188454046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522855291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1285438,0.00022228518,0.024413217,0.026547953,0.00022368004,0.00035236357,0.00010104434,0.00026869518,0.81932694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997322,0.00007755771,0.0011883851,0.00053361076,0.00006713982,0.000041123803,0.000011808291,0.0000029814073,0.00075538905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941766,0.000024411444,0.00016310257,0.000097154094,0.0001423587,0.00015530692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994741,0.00021698857,0.00006937428,0.00007980562,0.00008237113,0.00007734617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025642192,0.00005362956,0.000053750755,0.00003307039,0.00040070008,0.00007634629,0.0001166514,0.000049353937,0.00025237308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002824471,0.000036460682,0.000022555721,0.00009631407,0.00024006689,0.00048438576,0.000040799758,0.000042952062,0.00027636535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004105952,0.0000059071144,0.00559227,0.0000018671283,0.0000027840968,1.5144244e-7,0.0011149362,8.3320595e-7,0.000045945886,0.9702993,0.0003476489,0.022584269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053631363,0.000053735424,0.2656924,0.00005262307,0.000016750739,0.0000062685426,0.0026443691,0.00030262498,0.00007708216,0.17793252,0.5523542,0.00033110395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065527245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009646215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8687782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002648185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008296518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35522097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523429878","doi":"","title":"A Property Law Reader: Cases, Questions and Commentary, 4th Edition, Preface and Table of Contents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Principal (computer security); Property law; Element (criminal law); Law; Choice of law; Common law; Real property; Law and economics; Political science; Property rights; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.02899428516703129,"score_gpt":0.28462503769094116,"score_spread":0.2556307525239099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523429878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5339402,0.0028829484,0.0009026952,0.23169087,0.00061605213,0.0036012079,0.0017300162,0.00044185016,0.2241942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99297994,0.0002758304,0.00038261042,0.0014190477,0.00016498232,0.00006272368,0.000009064868,0.000007842458,0.004697982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917984,0.00008883918,0.00017037097,0.00019991817,0.00016855197,0.00019250246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993391,0.00011155534,0.00007331459,0.00017561529,0.000107960666,0.00019245296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023861574,0.000080440666,0.00012615926,0.000012798088,0.00060054625,0.000066039225,0.00011602401,0.00005777038,0.00013230671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008685196,0.000050178554,0.000019330566,0.000083559884,0.0006139014,0.0004131611,0.00007061646,0.00007323522,0.00001766872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001759617,0.00013062467,0.009785303,0.000025252126,0.00002525491,0.0000024931746,0.00069462747,3.8354924e-7,0.0021172198,0.94982857,0.036052514,0.0013201766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004571897,0.000060184455,0.0019021031,0.000094135976,0.000020982035,0.000004179104,0.00045980045,0.0000029770936,0.00060210924,0.004037396,0.9922464,0.000112561494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10633246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044838265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95619386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049432612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045222296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524712710","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3059","title":"Book Note: Natural Law In Court: A History Of Legal Theory In Practice, by R. H. Helmolz","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Political science; Legal history; Economic Justice; Comparative law; Common law; Natural law; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.010575523960575742,"score_gpt":0.28958181223260543,"score_spread":0.27900628827202967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524712710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038465476,0.0070133964,0.00021698988,0.014414171,0.00029400183,0.00015414163,0.000012474122,0.000016051734,0.9774941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98247015,0.000533243,0.0003270531,0.002470524,0.00018416028,0.0000098668315,0.0000010850018,0.000012377032,0.013991556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998313,0.0004274308,0.00036940203,0.0001598835,0.0003993536,0.0003309074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892116,0.0004309799,0.0002684607,0.0001474918,0.00010390688,0.00012800655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016794377,0.00010050855,0.00017554771,0.000051515202,0.00020426465,0.000046609293,0.0003479614,0.000102436155,0.0003684034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019277485,0.00007555848,0.00007466053,0.000099653786,0.0004755184,0.0010605099,0.000044823395,0.00045245537,0.00002976017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062380685,0.00014757493,0.00004193398,0.0000028097052,0.000008300313,0.000024281859,0.0012220589,0.000001855995,0.001487693,0.9777245,0.01765228,0.0016243478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006134795,0.000024604127,0.000051562307,0.00006488927,0.000010589601,0.00002336013,0.0004647811,0.0000051188213,0.00015424329,0.019490626,0.97898144,0.000115321614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051075988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18210934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98208547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008955722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038233318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525171706","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n8p6","title":"The Principle of Continuance in Public Service Contract","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continuance; Business; Public service; Service (business); Realization (probability); Executive branch; Contract management; Public interest; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Political science; Economics; Politics; Marketing","score_opus":0.029594645925991505,"score_gpt":0.32447525717530007,"score_spread":0.2948806112493086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525171706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92875415,0.00022491772,0.000052373205,0.04567889,0.00007245018,0.00006233698,0.0000086974205,0.0000019741406,0.025144203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988886,0.00025843395,0.000044006847,0.00033682486,0.000109725945,7.6630073e-7,3.098319e-8,0.0000018903496,0.0003596953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994335,0.000043939974,0.00021924394,0.000030908686,0.00013110935,0.00014130094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992026,0.00027141158,0.00018190009,0.000059266313,0.00020725366,0.00007758007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063532236,0.000026941892,0.0000807474,0.0000134332395,0.00015139808,0.000041115014,0.0001430624,0.000024826048,0.000011025291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012923431,0.000013864436,0.000024246569,0.000062060324,0.00018138715,0.00012503957,0.000018536777,0.000055430814,9.481118e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019069072,0.000016308979,0.0028261526,0.0000018645633,0.000004170837,5.2223834e-7,0.00033697186,1.2714878e-7,0.00023588736,0.9959713,0.000024675704,0.0005801143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026787876,0.000016647951,0.015784437,0.00002558072,0.0000037125951,0.0000021178082,0.00027115401,0.000005286932,0.0001496374,0.027126411,0.9563202,0.000026891485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010002458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051898207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9688449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026855483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012435213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2896042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525336485","doi":"10.29173/alr440","title":"Unique Public Duties of Care: Judicial Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Tort; Government (linguistics); Political science; Liability; Judicial activism; Supreme Court Decisions; Judicial review","score_opus":0.028799560372321075,"score_gpt":0.29728864992216664,"score_spread":0.26848908954984557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525336485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023133589,0.018653817,0.000011499438,0.27081394,0.00012042159,0.0012784353,0.00003656984,0.000008165199,0.68594354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901323,0.008424445,0.000007331073,0.0010403768,0.000031576074,0.000036287536,0.0000014428902,0.0000032069506,0.00032306003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913627,0.00018708562,0.0002141405,0.00008482609,0.00023084086,0.00014684416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990883,0.00045546002,0.00011392497,0.0002171234,0.00009055632,0.000034633013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000436446,0.000050746265,0.00018429992,0.0000074734685,0.000104608174,0.0000069386883,0.00035211415,0.00002611309,0.00013946916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025883733,0.000027920745,0.000044350843,0.0002054483,0.00019416428,0.00009164418,0.000027700453,0.000044796092,0.000002274086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.6591176e-7,0.00001163127,0.00034669111,0.0001232632,0.000004403451,1.3465933e-7,0.00079325284,2.5339046e-8,0.000014474484,0.99391264,0.0026512921,0.0021416342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044607623,0.000007232249,0.00046511384,0.00042681885,0.000011394509,1.9826689e-7,0.00024072299,7.9516965e-8,0.00007555966,0.0012450519,0.99743986,0.000043353273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94055057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99487555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007064006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007639677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15270895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527612733","doi":"","title":"Trust Regulation in the Czech Republic: the Model Law for Introduction of the Trust Instrument in the Republic of Latvia?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; The Republic; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.26993939187476623,"score_gpt":0.529157775443563,"score_spread":0.2592183835687968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527612733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9238328,0.00040281398,0.0004036977,0.06083416,0.00021308326,0.0019383957,0.000045184366,0.000009592899,0.012320302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981218,0.00054223096,0.00006622822,0.0003595472,0.0002640053,0.0001906624,0.000003075702,0.000011722276,0.00044075103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971791,0.0007146573,0.00080516696,0.00026035577,0.0007875943,0.00025311683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973496,0.00055867626,0.00094316056,0.0008096491,0.00030067336,0.000038222966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007143287,0.00013036914,0.00027847913,0.00016843657,0.00058728456,0.00047081985,0.0034651982,0.000088553665,0.00039792218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007407953,0.000055155317,0.00015993364,0.0013277136,0.00051816035,0.0014557057,0.0002967359,0.00024044512,6.3094063e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001928664,0.00057173404,0.07393652,0.00004769487,0.000068952395,2.7222848e-7,0.015320753,0.001494061,0.016026594,0.82331,0.027606064,0.04142449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008678256,0.000016924507,0.62219703,0.00015824252,0.00006409841,0.0000030326196,0.0043820054,0.0010505213,0.0069162943,0.19551973,0.16859068,0.00023360942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005398131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037096825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6277903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012981158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002263623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81603956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527975175","doi":"10.3138/9781442671669-015","title":"Mack v. Attorney General of Canada and the Structure of the Action in Unjust Enrichment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Physics; Restitution","score_opus":0.017544902709300262,"score_gpt":0.22439203942832353,"score_spread":0.20684713671902327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527975175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008058178,0.0004047038,0.0000036221797,0.00017247073,0.0000726716,0.00037751417,0.00015094932,0.00000289476,0.990757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47679183,0.00034107824,0.000048567137,0.00001664639,0.00006199728,1.05154356e-7,0.000001927039,0.000004094306,0.52273375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999458,0.000039383332,0.00010349084,0.00009942656,0.0002237475,0.00007594321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994706,0.000034328754,0.00023386796,0.00017422333,0.00005796804,0.000029043054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000695513,0.00007017039,0.0001521363,0.000005364919,0.00013839999,0.000003600316,0.00030030785,0.00009276253,0.00010836918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003450903,0.000053113166,0.00005067777,0.0000013819805,0.00040435122,0.000037322458,0.00011739204,0.000093049515,2.2833259e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004544616,0.0000043449813,0.00004266268,0.000027378741,0.000042845953,2.7653368e-7,0.0086996555,0.00005762336,0.00011130905,0.98792505,0.00078123243,0.0022621513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035884668,0.000005400846,0.0009590544,0.000032418935,0.000058306436,1.2497598e-7,0.0005407667,0.000017139973,0.00016088321,0.00076519296,0.99703187,0.00006999388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9860866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002944588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030952235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21658921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528019077","doi":"10.29173/alr444","title":"Tate &amp; Lyle : Pure Economic Loss and the Modern Tort of Public Nuisance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.037549258415729495,"score_gpt":0.31660776890328457,"score_spread":0.2790585104875551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528019077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03189851,0.085743554,0.0002613888,0.3250183,0.00014740824,0.0016376672,0.00003370985,0.000032292013,0.55522716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8992646,0.0909186,0.00003141964,0.0011314885,0.00006881808,0.000073950425,0.0000013794638,0.0000060447114,0.00850374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931747,0.00011394081,0.00019828492,0.0001438879,0.00007887923,0.00014751327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991632,0.00033228396,0.00011763253,0.00029032247,0.000031652147,0.0000648698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062162365,0.000061062885,0.0001917253,0.0000040190916,0.00018719751,0.000030444824,0.00026814765,0.000026127851,0.00031060414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011022587,0.00003146475,0.00006634881,0.000053543332,0.0005574416,0.00017195912,0.000057209567,0.00003255257,0.00017177236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.146186e-7,0.0000056639374,0.00024684865,0.00005604564,0.000008595004,2.6803335e-8,0.00027782348,7.1508275e-8,0.000004136343,0.98536223,0.0011010473,0.012936706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013068746,0.0000017019343,0.00006476108,0.00019428026,0.000018520972,6.895306e-7,0.0000047580993,0.0000022460033,0.000003272261,0.01599213,0.9835339,0.00005304536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011395835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06364861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98243284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026694406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006899793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99518734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528361617","doi":"10.29173/alr443","title":"The Rise and Fall of Plaintiff-Friendly Causation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.018618955193999528,"score_gpt":0.3121237151507845,"score_spread":0.293504759956785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528361617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026470548,0.1363174,0.00017272323,0.20654137,0.00018139799,0.0017278362,0.000017370918,0.00003499255,0.62853634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8568206,0.13678795,0.000044431195,0.00034225953,0.000053846125,0.00004793473,5.6548294e-7,0.000004597651,0.0058978414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948895,0.00008192455,0.00014534214,0.00008572783,0.000101137695,0.000096925345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918914,0.00047848685,0.00008019752,0.00016459635,0.000045080313,0.000042490617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042816668,0.000037887818,0.00008519066,0.0000028829945,0.00031215305,0.000017087392,0.00012870212,0.000019568603,0.00005102992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024093591,0.000018599902,0.000031115025,0.00007319691,0.0002739844,0.00008312386,0.000028146907,0.000021417802,0.000050573384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2751762e-7,0.0000041931603,0.00015105058,0.000037039186,0.0000035463227,2.717756e-8,0.00013882203,5.197804e-9,0.00001880295,0.9660451,0.0013279804,0.032273006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003790018,0.000005320711,0.00025050578,0.0002612071,0.000015706399,2.2223655e-7,0.000018201645,4.0611295e-7,0.00001515787,0.0019503428,0.99741244,0.000032572556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018377235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06249592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99608445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012556952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027879465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528660797","doi":"","title":"Economic Efficiency, Normative Account-Giving and Corporate Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Corporate law; Corporate governance; Legitimacy; Realm; Shareholder; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Economics; Business; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.028770493364782816,"score_gpt":0.2901020338080352,"score_spread":0.26133154044325235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528660797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8765562,0.0010522282,0.003340759,0.0067628967,0.00024289278,0.00020027043,0.000006897454,0.00005331105,0.11178454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974985,0.00060741365,0.000049969367,0.00012618136,0.00030639773,0.0000035121923,7.4624575e-7,0.000006480665,0.0014007597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855644,0.00007743102,0.00015035454,0.00010810417,0.00014923916,0.00095846213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994963,0.000037621525,0.000181517,0.00007062461,0.00006352394,0.00015044484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022268905,0.000069084315,0.00008993019,0.000030393283,0.0006742063,0.00018058336,0.00020662634,0.000042072985,0.000017969394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031684216,0.00006241626,0.000029751362,0.000075619784,0.00019066953,0.00040657134,0.00003884302,0.0005484736,0.00009299047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039646616,0.000010509794,0.0009865876,5.0671815e-7,0.00001096566,3.0909192e-7,0.0021298057,0.000054980897,0.000011327745,0.9954035,0.00008741591,0.001300107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046438017,0.000100430996,0.00033117394,0.0000070706656,0.000012997803,0.00005943706,0.020463543,0.00036961926,0.000023446655,0.8482641,0.12971234,0.00019147887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003044534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038248565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14713943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010140404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027912124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9793009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528824097","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1001","title":"A Closer Look at Seemingly Pro-Tenant Provisions in the Residential Tenancies Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Landlord; Notice; Renting; Legislature; Leasehold estate; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.030168176311533252,"score_gpt":0.35825166795438385,"score_spread":0.3280834916428506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528824097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7220536,0.00009170063,0.00000695677,0.21014445,0.000059373593,0.00027790858,0.0000069889256,0.00001019353,0.06734883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936886,0.00010708709,0.00004397776,0.0029933476,0.001989856,0.0000027917526,4.3449592e-7,0.000003465312,0.0011704612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989407,0.00013420163,0.00026741275,0.00007396082,0.00033953358,0.0002441782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995402,0.000059527443,0.00019039267,0.00006004465,0.00008257591,0.00006727901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082958874,0.000066624765,0.00014456871,0.00005482974,0.0010701898,0.00014304392,0.00023745926,0.00007613242,0.000007634643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000882412,0.000035953646,0.00009690209,0.00018426773,0.00023945278,0.00022466063,0.000029974914,0.00020466482,0.0000033326664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000331815,0.00010061898,0.00024225881,0.000003921288,0.000007796284,0.000011771004,0.07049804,6.7678445e-7,0.00053798157,0.9218361,0.0034317684,0.003295892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006480062,0.00018762203,0.04844547,0.000034825687,0.000032645254,0.000025488473,0.0084648505,0.0000024393992,0.00008462139,0.062172793,0.8797493,0.00015192329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00471237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058869277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87631756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011213982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003946447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8231143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529438815","doi":"10.29173/alr446","title":"Multi-Party Disputes: Equities Between Concurrent Tortfeasors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Plaintiff; Joint and several liability; Liability; Statute; Legislation; Law and economics; Injustice; Business; Indemnity; Law; Tort; Political science; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.08473565239656712,"score_gpt":0.3829410442121179,"score_spread":0.2982053918155508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529438815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009291606,0.13997257,0.0023544475,0.19930837,0.0011974843,0.0048186234,0.00026076735,0.00038423852,0.6424119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91728157,0.059576947,0.00018510532,0.0025253105,0.00048801073,0.00021404675,0.000017257627,0.000019179635,0.019692577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988478,0.00012952853,0.00028116812,0.00022536122,0.00021426615,0.00030187189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885166,0.00052115065,0.00010724209,0.00028136114,0.00005741429,0.00018116004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038436006,0.00011153347,0.00026408015,0.0000072444263,0.00035247474,0.00003966294,0.00035812304,0.000046727735,0.0008398062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025711986,0.00006841687,0.0001265827,0.00012491488,0.00033455354,0.00022347165,0.00008383225,0.00005679755,0.00096086983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8516756e-7,0.000024073777,0.0019448425,0.00014880451,0.000016573571,2.1336133e-7,0.00032555027,1.0933346e-8,0.000009184235,0.95430905,0.006728395,0.036493137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102997066,0.00000744988,0.00051472755,0.0010623393,0.000048913862,1.550493e-7,0.000023052547,3.6050488e-7,0.000014278956,0.0002987111,0.9977963,0.00013071991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012037711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016126415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006390877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079126665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529581439","doi":"","title":"The Death of Contract, Redux: Boilerplate and the End of Interpretation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Severability; Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Exclusion clause; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Contract management; Economics; Privity of contract","score_opus":0.007110858453336038,"score_gpt":0.27768944506388427,"score_spread":0.27057858661054823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529581439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91304004,0.0052328086,0.0099231005,0.04279578,0.00012659631,0.00033928434,0.0000063111925,0.000011302815,0.028524758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896306,0.009553986,0.000011339672,0.00001868093,0.00006649014,0.000003643127,6.02042e-8,0.0000026122748,0.0007126019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991142,0.00013039412,0.0001718596,0.000046646845,0.00014641644,0.0003904639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991919,0.0004351476,0.0002021234,0.00007301019,0.000074610245,0.000023226625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024955121,0.00003413337,0.00007139431,0.000011344271,0.0003714346,0.000024202182,0.00018419597,0.00002195132,0.000010062901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017759897,0.0000140216225,0.000045354693,0.000042911055,0.00044730815,0.00008938629,0.000015175089,0.00021581742,0.0000012812909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053386615,0.0000051051015,0.00034144527,3.790282e-7,0.000027376787,2.3105168e-8,0.0009194444,4.1049125e-7,0.00048083323,0.91985124,0.0000054918855,0.07831485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008198281,0.00006321724,0.0030193853,0.00002390739,0.000032533437,0.000013542482,0.002948269,0.000056585228,0.000445642,0.97953427,0.012998443,0.000044379387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007879939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028759318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07827047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095726566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006431889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28568122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529629861","doi":"10.29173/alr437","title":"Do We Really Need the Anns Test for Duty of Care in Negligence?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Duty; Test (biology); Duty of care; Law; Value (mathematics); Business; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.029973322022533288,"score_gpt":0.34390976101524434,"score_spread":0.31393643899271106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529629861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030205802,0.21793649,0.00006967852,0.35052994,0.00016897949,0.00513176,0.00011987672,0.00003331629,0.42298937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8430794,0.15340172,0.00009742827,0.0010815888,0.00009387083,0.00028431884,0.0000025483926,0.000008337268,0.0019508135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929976,0.00006232116,0.00022998598,0.00013229597,0.000113526694,0.00016213249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984431,0.0010386028,0.00009762819,0.00028292782,0.00009466702,0.00004307572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034352695,0.000059911064,0.00016843843,0.0000066609114,0.00017048563,0.000014328456,0.0003456424,0.00003439367,0.00009703217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005138405,0.000030563606,0.000087418535,0.00021795253,0.00015690939,0.00007837206,0.00003363592,0.00003373503,0.000035556543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013070843,0.000017703122,0.00068093115,0.0002542679,0.000003026184,6.7433895e-8,0.0014219887,8.2455344e-8,0.000032653203,0.9587192,0.001377943,0.037490815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000669442,0.000019729601,0.00020355928,0.0014022673,0.000017754364,1.3263517e-7,0.00022204571,3.1705676e-7,0.000028953733,0.0024045038,0.99557966,0.00005413625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020379737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16432162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032874388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010422641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98614365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529691861","doi":"","title":"Resolving Dilemmas in Canadian Class Actions by Reconsidering Private Law Principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pfizer Canada; BC Cancer Agency; Royal Bank of Canada; Pfizer","keywords":"Plaintiff; Wrongdoing; Class action; Law; Private law; Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Political science; Restitution; Common law; Economics; Public law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.188680171936929,"score_gpt":0.3436088980693538,"score_spread":0.1549287261324248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529691861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753792,0.000029266594,0.00012457682,0.0057054786,0.00014104505,0.0003298946,0.00007851982,0.00013830388,0.018073685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98673093,0.00010776495,0.0000474223,0.00031283483,0.00008634497,0.0000046719083,0.0000070209585,0.000026497326,0.012676534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978483,0.00028064876,0.0002527459,0.00049374567,0.00027866298,0.00084593456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985052,0.00020198205,0.00013068812,0.00042492282,0.00008482404,0.00065238634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006395778,0.00019255347,0.00020011132,0.00033910898,0.0010551421,0.00028911963,0.00072089746,0.0002199259,0.000087310575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012335586,0.00019495552,0.00008168817,0.0005409589,0.00030783494,0.0019170461,0.00019283814,0.00035915908,0.0002094965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000919888,0.000031018324,0.91733575,0.0000067340534,0.000015593034,0.000048664322,0.00091138727,0.0000067461897,0.0015015949,0.07968772,0.0000037645095,0.00044182278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038951845,0.000013792176,0.23498276,0.00014129088,0.000013779236,0.0000027918095,0.00048205003,1.7235503e-7,0.0008721604,0.0004478855,0.76235586,0.00029793222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03151069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9716645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9401538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013705211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048597105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9749386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529753270","doi":"10.7202/1037966ar","title":"Can Better Law Be Married with Corrective Justice or Evil Laws?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04167411055314016,"score_gpt":0.3097435729707871,"score_spread":0.26806946241764695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529753270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010120383,0.000013853042,0.00035005144,0.05839433,0.0004051846,0.0002265702,0.00014737969,0.000067162844,0.9302751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99125576,0.000037090496,0.0006196507,0.0037672843,0.00062020315,0.000015449717,7.4539395e-7,0.000015709562,0.0036681155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879605,0.00012336521,0.00017389754,0.00017158853,0.00037594797,0.00035914066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990511,0.0001961296,0.00013325065,0.00014541365,0.00019920051,0.00027491784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038961883,0.00010692232,0.00013291127,0.000017948701,0.00494748,0.00011433829,0.00027220283,0.00006428342,0.00088741846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057479945,0.00005683517,0.00005221287,0.00014129275,0.0004029117,0.00030164482,0.000038539205,0.00020396017,0.000057291345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006642867,0.00003724895,0.00012866654,0.0000030835906,0.00003145555,0.000028496643,0.0006248961,0.0000019874205,0.000086655455,0.9930236,0.0016335833,0.004333945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045846676,0.000072845534,0.0001857513,0.00004375974,0.000063251144,0.00004601816,0.0011539058,0.0000014801298,0.00034787375,0.0022351572,0.9952475,0.00014403698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008239143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30560094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020741588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005231513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530124281","doi":"10.5539/ass.v12n11p86","title":"A Comparative Study of Concept and Bases of Frustration of Purpose Doctrine in Iranian and English Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Frustration of purpose; Frustration; Doctrine; Obligation; Law; Deliberation; Denial; Political science; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Exclusion clause; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Contract management; Epistemology; Philosophy; Privity of contract","score_opus":0.03730229654324608,"score_gpt":0.3511702762835778,"score_spread":0.3138679797403317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530124281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323815,0.000011438009,0.000014316199,0.0004114312,0.000015524196,0.00028943855,0.000015864825,0.0000043842774,0.06685608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998659,0.000004914624,0.000056089928,0.0000071382215,0.000029704517,0.0000065562895,1.3836004e-7,9.598707e-7,0.000028586705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992622,0.000070073154,0.00017787142,0.00013557404,0.00024690057,0.00010734763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995565,0.00007478575,0.00012762085,0.00005493681,0.00014170798,0.00004445105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004499085,0.00003935409,0.00014491739,0.000037594677,0.00020179857,0.000014939924,0.00013389236,0.000023491923,0.000010247119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081830156,0.000030516292,0.000010516547,0.00045299737,0.0021672004,0.00028527342,0.000041326068,0.000028384602,1.07230804e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009884101,0.00021712537,0.015252556,0.000004548603,0.0000031358907,2.2064805e-7,0.24258488,1.0182037e-7,0.006636389,0.7181837,0.00000901407,0.017098447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016966973,0.0004702743,0.68342197,0.000054786335,0.00001951304,1.644687e-7,0.28844064,0.0000040475347,0.014382182,0.007902055,0.0034257378,0.00018193372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035764794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008192973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71028167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022142156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.798514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531490401","doi":"","title":"Flaws and Improvement of the Legal System for Forfeiture of Inheritance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Genetics","score_opus":0.018110943505346005,"score_gpt":0.32550558498177345,"score_spread":0.3073946414764275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531490401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8914519,0.00013343035,0.0002409653,0.010424441,0.0010655721,0.0009188568,0.000053458898,0.000015894826,0.09569547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961459,0.000006461345,0.00021125402,0.00003638781,0.00013370006,0.00004425591,1.2990974e-7,0.0000021256812,0.0034197862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993284,0.000015040214,0.00016456844,0.0001132119,0.0002683532,0.00011044149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992864,0.00004418212,0.00023292883,0.00010181659,0.00030093308,0.000033716475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042753248,0.00003583092,0.00008020265,0.00001911586,0.00037027657,0.000013271075,0.00029828286,0.000031132266,0.000012696496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003876519,0.00002195379,0.00003696771,0.0003135792,0.0010651071,0.00016970516,0.000038676204,0.000017476552,2.9386325e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002177638,0.000029860932,0.00055001193,0.000024866042,0.0000014068071,7.898155e-10,0.0019421092,3.8821895e-8,0.08386608,0.90921235,0.00019701097,0.004174055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003741246,0.000066177105,0.26702967,0.00015421235,0.000022083786,1.2735852e-7,0.0076494403,0.0000014729095,0.09242819,0.009352158,0.62277323,0.00014911381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000517013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034534783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8998602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088748624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006358974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39244312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531701421","doi":"10.29173/alr445","title":"Contribution Between Negligent Tortfeasors and Unjust Enrichment: An Outline of a Solution to the \"No Benefit to B\" Issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Joint and several liability; Payment; Economics; Law; Tort; Business; Political science; Finance; History","score_opus":0.025435365638782112,"score_gpt":0.3377882352698575,"score_spread":0.3123528696310754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531701421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13012521,0.031189125,0.0035460899,0.7736972,0.0005320996,0.009730021,0.00030215882,0.000101231686,0.05077686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862836,0.008301269,0.000085550986,0.0028582595,0.00035030185,0.00011744481,0.000012782315,0.0000066663356,0.001984127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905,0.000097515964,0.00026616792,0.00019544837,0.00018975975,0.00020107825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907273,0.00018168376,0.0000923741,0.00028337954,0.00017301286,0.00019682354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000637787,0.00008176006,0.00020681223,0.000010670758,0.00029392986,0.000023514356,0.00022430181,0.000036811125,0.0001612181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003170624,0.000046866564,0.00004567704,0.00020723857,0.000067753965,0.00014795957,0.00007143656,0.000031405918,0.0003118957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049960163,0.000044028846,0.0011966056,0.000080885715,0.00002093744,6.696646e-8,0.0008971366,7.942762e-7,0.00019149295,0.9322789,0.0031096986,0.06217448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006919138,0.000060098042,0.0019581418,0.00040303505,0.0000580951,1.2193308e-7,0.00001622657,8.373705e-7,0.00006228681,0.0003491027,0.9969439,0.00007895451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024604514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030835683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063195854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028219785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98684907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533596360","doi":"","title":"Applying the ex turpi causa principle in tort actions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Tort; Damages; Law; Plaintiff; Wrongdoing; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.04065055375142693,"score_gpt":0.30398182145493546,"score_spread":0.26333126770350856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533596360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74913603,0.000012775828,0.005311482,0.004733082,0.00018707493,0.0011106982,0.000009735696,0.00014988592,0.23934926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117166,0.000027759645,0.0026288074,0.00015209864,0.0001619197,0.000013004362,0.000003911281,0.000013227148,0.005827642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982165,0.00024796545,0.00023911177,0.00039990037,0.0004480337,0.00044850385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847806,0.00044086366,0.0002801195,0.0005164877,0.0001444921,0.00013996655],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018320174,0.00014372272,0.00023160441,0.00013428228,0.0013658474,0.000054854918,0.00086011837,0.00014374834,0.00041569324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045477675,0.00015177128,0.00013767018,0.00064895436,0.0004281726,0.00033678702,0.00034042785,0.00040045133,0.00020673705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051188465,0.00048567945,0.14762874,0.00007435725,0.00007380841,0.000011690629,0.042157225,0.00095993915,0.0028592567,0.65885144,0.0011085852,0.14573807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041147793,0.0000137497545,0.09401638,0.000045752673,0.000024206574,0.0000012655657,0.010959684,0.0011227594,0.000116360505,0.0015622943,0.8915054,0.00022064612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010441705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010915973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89039683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019677645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017792534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537912059","doi":"10.1093/9780199677993.001.0001","title":"14. Privity of Contract","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Statutory law; Enforcement; Business; Law; Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Exclusion clause; Contract management; Economics","score_opus":0.055017003678380916,"score_gpt":0.3471691843430573,"score_spread":0.2921521806646764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537912059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031948122,0.000085506865,0.00007400417,0.00078454154,0.00007467928,0.00022276535,0.00003576824,0.000037621663,0.9986532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016538406,0.000049782433,0.0001451535,0.00007296525,0.00028927193,0.000006224448,0.00001289138,0.0000064303,0.98287886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932516,0.000024473353,0.00013371596,0.00010814157,0.00030157107,0.00010693042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934953,0.00007638494,0.00012345567,0.00017114118,0.00018759274,0.00009188419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043852796,0.000061221916,0.00015856468,0.000017736764,0.000080805876,0.000017860913,0.00022731842,0.0001763062,0.00079886254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000799225,0.000052727883,0.000063924555,0.00003350783,0.00018742372,0.000046317877,0.000038630627,0.000121586745,0.00017288601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1305766e-7,0.0000141439095,0.0000135467,0.000004694876,0.000006921265,1.9147457e-7,0.00044097245,2.0491262e-7,0.0000020165464,0.8059282,0.19191705,0.0016713724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044711953,0.0000057607413,0.000048396207,0.000008310712,0.000011370962,4.6381135e-8,0.00003416731,0.0000014520922,0.000004967523,0.035173975,0.96460307,0.0000637719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002080986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042404835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.772686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011672767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014488979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87469846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541481203","doi":"10.29173/alr449","title":"Rethinking Privacy: Exclusivity, Private Relation and Tort Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Plaintiff; Law; Dignity; Relation (database); Liability; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04068010468877922,"score_gpt":0.3254055435698499,"score_spread":0.2847254388810707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541481203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021159673,0.018362809,0.00028137403,0.13942084,0.00016969537,0.001491142,0.0000052046594,0.000116188115,0.8189931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546694,0.036081232,0.00040627553,0.0048385295,0.00015311081,0.000051217517,0.0000033141398,0.000013011705,0.0037839017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990251,0.0001317191,0.00022217017,0.00022752806,0.00020121405,0.00019228838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991037,0.00034380797,0.000113225215,0.00029532705,0.000042586747,0.000101334066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006859549,0.00008570723,0.00017046234,0.000006517768,0.0005748473,0.00005182945,0.00020634709,0.00006380584,0.00018503006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002583758,0.000058088783,0.000052097537,0.00012334617,0.00023448945,0.00038335292,0.00014264576,0.000069745016,0.00016208466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.830023e-7,0.000008156447,0.0004906354,0.000086269814,0.000005088755,2.6722697e-7,0.0005027017,1.1563581e-8,0.000045309338,0.99234116,0.00036929353,0.0061506485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006618811,0.00000561606,0.0005678237,0.0010422611,0.000027000746,0.0000011230258,0.0000019632475,5.8155075e-7,0.000017670589,0.04701931,0.95115113,0.00009935886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011699957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018949313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005360582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036233614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542214041","doi":"","title":"Keeping the Promise of Public Fiduciary Theory: A Reply to Leib and Galoob","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty publications","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Private law; Sociology; Public law; Duty","score_opus":0.09025192314591357,"score_gpt":0.356500903930992,"score_spread":0.2662489807850784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542214041","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099393584,0.00007146095,0.010742574,0.78309125,0.000053193788,0.0011732938,0.00026978904,0.00019335923,0.10501152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848578,0.000027884664,0.0009415715,0.0013396752,0.00011541879,0.00040035954,0.000014850188,0.000008692802,0.012293722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989315,0.00016149798,0.00020362943,0.00023560842,0.00022442336,0.00024330229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986327,0.00030480098,0.00010776566,0.00045345316,0.00031972377,0.00018155432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013748913,0.0000689957,0.00008994768,0.00007188882,0.00080292806,0.00015648014,0.0004747252,0.000041561165,0.0001602195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019051331,0.000040295196,0.000044981945,0.00063719874,0.00033187598,0.00038168623,0.00012811927,0.000060549002,0.000051250463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013009692,0.000038900398,0.0024200939,0.0000019316703,0.000011651659,1.8900627e-8,0.0033572924,2.202483e-7,0.00050937856,0.9667106,0.011350902,0.0155977085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010035006,0.000008501834,0.03906533,0.000009828985,0.000009019231,5.130389e-7,0.0012721746,0.0000041189287,0.00007921278,0.012592634,0.94678277,0.00007554513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005389376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006256016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95411795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051215717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002535794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61755544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542841893","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v5n1p168","title":"Modernising the Law of Gift","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Gift giving; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.21694481832167364,"score_gpt":0.5060792735081826,"score_spread":0.28913445518650893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542841893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018846733,0.000017632523,0.0004995393,0.07623635,0.00008170646,0.00011195677,0.000019646823,0.000013151278,0.90417325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98796296,0.0000283876,0.00008175871,0.00016427682,0.00024071391,0.000019129664,6.587665e-7,0.0000035984403,0.0114985285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873495,0.00012573136,0.00009934027,0.000096003285,0.0007856663,0.00015827842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988419,0.0005705682,0.000025044628,0.00013861725,0.00038459763,0.000039268874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012838634,0.00002504064,0.00003413031,0.000021996659,0.00047321245,0.000065092296,0.0005939894,0.000026352262,0.00040938734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014641801,0.000013673399,0.000032029857,0.00008531905,0.0009545583,0.00013833371,0.00012048715,0.00008745097,0.0001398633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045101265,0.000018283577,0.00009726103,5.6715777e-7,0.000007014008,3.1209595e-7,0.0005202008,0.0000019337056,0.0024513002,0.9945497,0.0004244877,0.0019244241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063464024,0.0000052736846,0.00016096029,0.000010705406,5.7193716e-7,2.0385298e-7,0.00023143477,0.00003053502,0.0019766728,0.122480735,0.8750177,0.000021722806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01582055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008177919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007403308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007855736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2545063720","doi":"","title":"Developments in Canadian Adult Guardianship and Co-Decision-Making Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Autonomy; Political science; Legislation; Guardian; Paternalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.031002948268392703,"score_gpt":0.37726675423942974,"score_spread":0.346263805971037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2545063720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8098025,0.0026188612,0.000021739905,0.013238097,0.0002503698,0.00019522745,0.000010791764,0.000014277597,0.17384815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965342,0.0007179919,0.001098827,0.0014090359,0.00014615004,0.0000015688842,2.0382099e-7,0.000004273159,0.00008773868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988748,0.00005429533,0.00034700334,0.00010171708,0.00031026674,0.00031190613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919546,0.00017179019,0.00014036527,0.00005865557,0.00024489552,0.00018884926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081066764,0.000086247055,0.00022349945,0.00013209555,0.00063890876,0.00011315175,0.000187188,0.00004800439,0.0000056256863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000455844,0.00007292251,0.000042491516,0.00023185794,0.00015146317,0.00031638338,0.000020425268,0.00019674927,0.000006178889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046119054,0.00007666317,0.057981174,0.0000101639625,0.00010310184,0.00027228167,0.043173186,0.00004228305,0.00002486205,0.8285176,0.004407655,0.06534489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047757398,0.00007822811,0.18660918,0.00029277187,0.000022027796,0.000026072577,0.0114904465,0.0000030089893,0.000014548145,0.016705044,0.7840533,0.00022778714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065443985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70964056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028307064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004169715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9407793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W254730076","doi":"10.5840/envirophil2011819","title":"Law’s Environment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Applied philosophy; General interest; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05075763628237828,"score_gpt":0.24372725440722925,"score_spread":0.19296961812485097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W254730076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035859548,0.000089597335,0.00010746148,0.0011156178,0.00007333224,0.00023759878,0.000024350584,0.00006322267,0.9624293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968514,0.0001179624,0.00085601147,0.0006953756,0.00025603606,0.000039764443,0.00000867252,0.000013192329,0.0011616164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916476,0.00004309093,0.00012070988,0.00020968122,0.00024583816,0.00021593903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995698,0.000011521769,0.000041929674,0.0002285653,7.50224e-7,0.00014747924],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000117474134,0.000090056245,0.000071112816,0.00001551366,0.00047438024,0.000013811116,0.00022681426,0.0000548317,0.0047010924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000017192767,0.000092711634,0.00006295674,0.000028853083,0.00052128354,0.00016076282,0.00008461619,0.000089512374,0.00301674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045047977,0.00021165823,0.0011305065,9.394474e-7,0.000009000565,0.0000030600952,0.0038121317,0.000001308727,0.0004384575,0.993408,0.00012225777,0.00085812225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018504345,0.000040539544,0.0065046223,0.0000028714398,0.000013780819,7.7309204e-7,0.00063789677,0.0000026701766,0.00094838126,0.17918459,0.81225556,0.00022326579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005603282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023993716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96126765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011197702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006743906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550873366","doi":"10.1017/s1352325216000033","title":"LEGAL POWERS IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Private law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030963256392081466,"score_gpt":0.3228814066680886,"score_spread":0.29191815027600715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550873366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08615957,0.0000868231,0.00024524584,0.0031291102,0.00020262144,0.00017117121,0.000004266989,0.00008382795,0.90991735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98821247,0.0000073155857,0.00023439455,0.0010488294,0.00021009933,0.000019387322,0.0000022876645,0.000008854229,0.010256386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990099,0.00019567728,0.00013419459,0.00015910633,0.00022829014,0.00027281005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995165,0.000070942726,0.000036111396,0.00018210137,0.00003432361,0.00016000475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012533397,0.00006908748,0.00009102749,0.000032025568,0.00017267736,0.000112217,0.00029090454,0.000064983506,0.00010381653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011823843,0.00006505165,0.00003904546,0.00022950332,0.00029273503,0.0003768681,0.000059649017,0.00016577025,0.00028295076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015756064,0.00003283819,0.00015786612,9.643287e-7,0.0000026255354,0.0000068133136,0.0026187827,0.000016779815,0.00004538028,0.99577117,0.00050437386,0.0008266299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001744865,0.000010695152,0.00015318615,0.0000052229893,0.0000021916087,5.63694e-7,0.0016204194,0.0000074122004,0.000084353975,0.15756692,0.84029096,0.000083619474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008717176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044430965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9020529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011514981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016164822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552017794","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2869350","title":"Corporate and Trust Law Dimensions of the Trinity Western University Law School Debate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Corporate law; Corporate governance; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.02142264440486447,"score_gpt":0.2542373933007058,"score_spread":0.23281474889584136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552017794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784184,0.00013829091,0.000422594,0.008528074,0.000060667582,0.00013079782,0.00001109028,0.000015711612,0.012274378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923443,0.0015549308,0.000010676418,0.000094895775,0.000062784195,3.6387348e-7,1.2310979e-7,0.000003807821,0.005928118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894494,0.0001505982,0.00010379238,0.000090107176,0.00015126246,0.00055927585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999477,0.000057782123,0.00017507008,0.00011770684,0.000071526796,0.00010089155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007817404,0.000053020405,0.000080280166,0.000014252494,0.0009744181,0.000024676283,0.00024827808,0.000042038144,0.000018626835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002860134,0.000028126999,0.000053561984,0.00012462243,0.00042880507,0.00018902747,0.00006550718,0.00037196872,0.000010895121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010515922,0.000016833977,0.0079535125,5.199278e-7,0.00001772977,3.6756472e-7,0.000127919,5.861465e-7,0.00050208677,0.99071354,0.000014316351,0.0006420809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012494732,0.0001011178,0.013031402,0.00004275522,0.00007868463,0.000039198007,0.0034563022,0.0000029878242,0.00052113394,0.7186258,0.26265985,0.00019129287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027558925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06732566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27208772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003037948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001027715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9496932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553335236","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3860","title":"De-Ciphering Self-Help","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Scholarship; Government (linguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.011420178437838158,"score_gpt":0.23900912723153353,"score_spread":0.22758894879369537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553335236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06682227,0.00015513755,0.006394595,0.0034466644,0.00009891613,0.000057557227,0.000005106948,0.00004680709,0.9229729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925805,0.00044284874,0.0034163129,0.000026356664,0.00013620897,1.912996e-8,4.764012e-8,0.000002050944,0.0033956745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960685,0.000043136613,0.00004649122,0.000048744398,0.00012240966,0.00013238857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966514,0.00003061815,0.00006166823,0.00005772377,0.00006503234,0.00011979429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023830979,0.00002786236,0.00004947558,0.0000038372177,0.0007274651,0.000019333245,0.00022235313,0.000033232427,0.0019483696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009240839,0.000024186207,0.000051271316,0.000012865118,0.00010747858,0.00036556186,0.000032528995,0.000036634483,0.000014868117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013656454,0.00005479801,0.0022614296,0.0000026711798,0.000034927572,0.000009792621,0.013227848,0.000003895226,0.0013547977,0.9632403,0.0022938156,0.017502015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019888794,0.000012914397,0.0020188985,0.000013233635,0.000011337391,0.0000028716574,0.005141034,0.0000042167667,0.00003954686,0.0009166425,0.9915957,0.000044737277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057673886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10691803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98930186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041405766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008920958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555408628","doi":"10.29173/alr795","title":"Watertight Compartments: Getting Back to the Constitutional Division of Powers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Presumption; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Flexibility (engineering); Division (mathematics); Law and economics; Separation of powers; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04875225404724249,"score_gpt":0.3701375574959828,"score_spread":0.32138530344874033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555408628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034176882,0.0045183613,0.00017220709,0.13102731,0.00022639362,0.0011037682,0.000014288334,0.000008772493,0.8595112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919916,0.002072354,0.00015732163,0.0036272753,0.00006118917,0.000028519264,0.0000064998317,0.000002662004,0.0020525835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999304,0.00006348526,0.0001918301,0.0001184939,0.00018423246,0.00013795472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992153,0.00011866703,0.0001357686,0.00039871555,0.000060805112,0.000070733586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004318151,0.000055483164,0.0001401429,0.0000038069004,0.0012186405,0.00006950563,0.0005216865,0.000017934719,0.00049300626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020214274,0.00003348518,0.000068644615,0.000043337845,0.0005542333,0.00013525941,0.00011808715,0.00004447366,0.00072595343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.395643e-7,0.000015643707,0.000705731,0.000052964817,0.000007982036,8.497418e-8,0.00022812316,0.0000014452803,0.000009045487,0.991768,0.005840471,0.0013700435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042323256,0.0000044528038,0.0006814426,0.0006070858,0.000016045055,2.0949709e-7,0.000012627993,0.0000025335873,0.000029540835,0.00030312256,0.99825,0.000050609437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01153799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075601107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020080288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046481637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556571509","doi":"","title":"Civil Procedure: Breach of what?: The Harman principle revisited","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LSJ: Law Society of NSW Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Misconduct; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.025608532200379078,"score_gpt":0.3236943531339864,"score_spread":0.29808582093360736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556571509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59019536,0.006714338,0.00438411,0.2720957,0.0008729031,0.0019213965,0.000112175374,0.00018903389,0.123515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99232894,0.0038778745,0.00059365,0.00080871006,0.0004937669,0.000007376827,8.474302e-7,0.0000111704485,0.0018776356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859524,0.000111321526,0.00036873118,0.0001305259,0.0005268404,0.00026734621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988945,0.00016044952,0.00030609936,0.0002170159,0.0002991683,0.00012274619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013792843,0.00009008291,0.00017442177,0.000007805189,0.00086278265,0.00011286042,0.00054663257,0.00008749919,0.00039166643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060414863,0.00005019035,0.00031952557,0.00023270024,0.00068946497,0.0005272926,0.00007746274,0.00021661486,0.000012865745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021668096,0.00025955462,0.003413037,0.00009370264,0.0002040147,8.46678e-7,0.025287561,0.000005754267,0.023512786,0.8748365,0.063181706,0.00918288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004995358,0.000038198967,0.0031456123,0.00027673246,0.00004574652,0.000014606409,0.0053341743,0.000028281018,0.0025730792,0.0064110975,0.9814984,0.00013448989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022138117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025335382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9183167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007667463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023568032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6635914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556718980","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2002.11421416","title":"Lord Cooke of Thorndon's Final Appeal (<i>Delaware Mansions Ltd v Westminster City Council</i>)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Commonwealth; Art","score_opus":0.10216009995123092,"score_gpt":0.27387997332235225,"score_spread":0.17171987337112132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556718980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25155726,0.0002125807,0.0027131941,0.011884966,0.00032513426,0.000362488,0.00013903124,0.00008664648,0.7327187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98976445,0.0013862877,0.0010527039,0.00047093048,0.0002168268,4.470492e-7,0.0000044876892,0.000010458993,0.007093379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980038,0.00024683922,0.00029911537,0.00019910398,0.0007711236,0.00048004303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983005,0.00012566935,0.0003327327,0.00027546776,0.0005103819,0.00045525603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008078914,0.00014575693,0.0002616548,0.0000669274,0.0032779728,0.00007986678,0.00070975017,0.00014249375,0.00086872745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003356583,0.00015248249,0.00018126119,0.0003647524,0.0005371689,0.000459393,0.00014246005,0.000602302,0.00002110982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014465916,0.0006530909,0.013980124,0.00004257801,0.00007693409,0.00012869974,0.008205564,0.0001499751,0.00003140563,0.940044,0.02451316,0.012029805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070190063,0.00009402257,0.0014943748,0.000042718228,0.00004044449,0.000026952104,0.0038096649,0.00014378215,0.0000067637343,0.0008813428,0.9925933,0.00016472032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043132477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03678565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96808016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068664865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038657303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557917075","doi":"","title":"The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era: Historical Vision and Legal Change, by James Q. Whitman","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Romance; Law; Political science; Art; Art history; History; Literature; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02439302399369461,"score_gpt":0.2954558120262284,"score_spread":0.2710627880325338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557917075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80804104,0.029100046,0.00006524679,0.12176407,0.0010648055,0.00033809536,0.00000366367,0.00001373267,0.039609317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601245,0.00060647214,0.00002645673,0.0003677038,0.00030020095,0.0000046294294,9.868267e-8,0.0000050558133,0.0026769144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989527,0.00018275544,0.00029202728,0.00007625403,0.000354716,0.00014155642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992057,0.00024323429,0.00028814079,0.00013298447,0.0000697204,0.00006019558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010621514,0.00006140444,0.00013495334,0.000041804167,0.0003061611,0.000031769527,0.00035092284,0.000044709806,0.000017808337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006256479,0.000028792505,0.00006819761,0.000070192866,0.0003446688,0.00046848456,0.000027052945,0.00016761753,0.0000024953629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057302328,0.00027498204,0.0007341497,0.000013063813,0.000021984779,0.000029631012,0.022944514,1.2996895e-7,0.0047325674,0.54717034,0.40368515,0.02033615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019738583,0.000077377415,0.0046537565,0.000025652878,0.00001141583,0.0000108617805,0.0004600347,0.00000109564,0.000012271823,0.00080708106,0.99369806,0.00004499211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039983094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003566707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5900129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065274857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009894469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60442746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560235809","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3049","title":"Book Note: The Court Of Appeal For Ontario: Defining The Right Of Appeal, 1792-2013, by Christopher Moore","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Redress; Political science; Jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Law of the case; Sociology; Court of record; Jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.011915082872954832,"score_gpt":0.2762015473640066,"score_spread":0.26428646449105175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560235809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039151837,0.0071058287,0.0142751755,0.12244751,0.00058104313,0.0011007487,0.00025402577,0.000040248135,0.8502802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99171704,0.00031573634,0.00055211113,0.0006521585,0.0002530479,0.000025999489,0.0000022967897,0.000014190723,0.0064673913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864656,0.00010893628,0.0003764078,0.00013680654,0.0004162017,0.0003150854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987259,0.0003230303,0.00042013472,0.00024787383,0.0001786581,0.000104397936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011034734,0.00010849453,0.00018379466,0.0000127942985,0.0013941481,0.00006689041,0.0006642733,0.00009100963,0.0006152986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004182424,0.000050447965,0.00018122914,0.00007131535,0.0005917879,0.00018115409,0.00005702011,0.00023482519,0.000019102803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027819457,0.000063664236,0.0002654044,0.0000058258806,0.000036215795,4.8787575e-7,0.0025085842,0.000009687594,0.00079734775,0.8582094,0.13668898,0.0013866464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041685565,0.00004884705,0.0002570713,0.000052336152,0.000040942625,0.0000069831253,0.00040247256,0.000014187533,0.0006020802,0.02342746,0.9746417,0.00008909548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19863154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6078835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012543923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027590612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560622901","doi":"","title":"The Tudor Law of Treason, an Introduction, by John Bellamy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01480436866576484,"score_gpt":0.2659887861679658,"score_spread":0.25118441750220094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560622901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42285645,0.019675987,0.0013624969,0.32381955,0.005735263,0.00044822166,0.000031919906,0.00006241056,0.22600773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821372,0.0003700657,0.000116134215,0.00012283599,0.0014532007,0.0000016086552,1.803628e-7,0.0000053622366,0.015793424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993122,0.00009105275,0.00022038454,0.000054307176,0.00023080112,0.00009122718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920845,0.000081501785,0.0002999377,0.00012559009,0.00020679907,0.000077699755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074532395,0.00003474533,0.00007907482,0.000017407448,0.00028658618,0.00000848204,0.00024048048,0.000027796634,0.0001693534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009410422,0.000018680164,0.000057795995,0.000043083233,0.00042090495,0.00020241132,0.000009245874,0.000065023116,0.0000070351275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021044241,0.00008706183,0.00013242262,0.0000014219187,0.000016797509,6.303421e-7,0.0024201914,6.911383e-7,0.012659286,0.3480773,0.62684584,0.009737319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010741776,0.00004478789,0.00026651373,0.0000035175458,0.00001047216,0.0000028721763,0.00038458183,1.9329546e-7,0.00036426823,0.0011317058,0.9976548,0.000028891112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039775166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008452336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55928075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003305697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018953718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2204218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560716322","doi":"10.3138/cjh.48.3.479","title":"<i>The Invention of Law in the West</i>, by Aldo Schiavone, translated by Jeremy Carden and Anthony Shugaar","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.017379339556552832,"score_gpt":0.2600622493423793,"score_spread":0.2426829097858265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560716322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8666534,0.042603415,0.00007157931,0.026431467,0.00034997507,0.0004051307,0.000011567972,0.000009337871,0.06346415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982068,0.0006113309,0.0000520586,0.00028276708,0.00006448675,0.00000449183,6.9217543e-7,0.0000039077336,0.0007734824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991714,0.00017044364,0.00025709695,0.00005088254,0.00025008444,0.00010012374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995089,0.00009205972,0.00020643843,0.000074959156,0.00007053848,0.000047061207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008468611,0.000043348253,0.00009500776,0.000020840047,0.0002268194,0.000022864706,0.0002166482,0.00004740891,0.000052478033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022215876,0.000027210875,0.000053707794,0.00006432964,0.00033714922,0.00018338801,0.000006231332,0.00019642148,0.0000039486167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032001426,0.00026763976,0.001075055,0.000021773641,0.000049522274,0.0000032473395,0.04632239,0.0000069483644,0.044700503,0.07912695,0.8212758,0.0071182204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017909752,0.000029018229,0.000998541,0.0000122448555,0.000012830772,0.0000023933253,0.0011407745,0.0000057579964,0.00006899543,0.0013455614,0.99616855,0.000036202266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004690703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017123376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17489283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009652605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008418268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7090971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560948472","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1306","title":"Aboriginal Title and the Provinces after Tsilhqot’in Nation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic Justice; High Court; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03704934952863398,"score_gpt":0.35246408280565816,"score_spread":0.3154147332770242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560948472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010768219,0.07954967,0.000027938551,0.032520264,0.00011223722,0.00063132733,0.000004228278,0.000023885472,0.8860536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93647003,0.053071454,0.00023543333,0.0028980917,0.0003170742,0.00019962079,0.0000034918426,0.0000069598955,0.0067978147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965554,0.000055761437,0.00006496222,0.000056241515,0.00011025192,0.000057252953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983865,0.000016471235,0.00001909995,0.00006349199,0.000034899218,0.00002738817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005929893,0.000025189554,0.000058130016,0.0000039116285,0.000050352966,0.000024690067,0.000068254485,0.000012938849,0.00014444381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023340614,0.000015555472,0.000013918793,0.00006719157,0.00011993245,0.00006052278,0.0000069739667,0.000036733414,0.0001795004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012611442,0.0000047705157,0.000101472,0.000038960796,0.0000010179153,2.6881742e-7,0.0003297372,5.990159e-8,1.703193e-7,0.9911212,0.0059917667,0.0024093676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006382196,0.0000015924078,0.00007812949,0.000087375185,0.0000064001524,2.071997e-7,0.000023254208,0.0000075899015,4.3045839e-7,0.003952953,0.9957546,0.00002364871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013908827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034223255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98976284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002228975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073551484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23071744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561384485","doi":"","title":"Problems arising in compensating unconcious plaintiffs for loss of amenities of life: a comparative survey","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; High Court; Appeal; Common law; Political science; Trial court; Position (finance); English law; Precedent; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.16089085258807517,"score_gpt":0.3683810508009158,"score_spread":0.20749019821284065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561384485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689349,0.0006112963,0.0021495,0.0006009791,0.000069430396,0.0002662385,0.0003037639,0.0000039876963,0.027059918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983354,0.000022515018,0.001299923,0.000027440297,0.00012012418,0.000005673015,0.0000058946966,0.0000041635767,0.00017887293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873656,0.00016231286,0.0006332535,0.00009252404,0.0002540085,0.00012135731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977092,0.00066516135,0.0007492209,0.000046732137,0.0007672025,0.00006246467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008666117,0.000086164946,0.0003644013,0.000088411995,0.00015444674,0.000041360283,0.00023760939,0.000036142,0.00003592346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008750006,0.000074004085,0.000072419534,0.00011817804,0.0004576583,0.00019130799,0.000033495708,0.00012875133,0.00000220664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006481785,0.0006452743,0.041926473,0.00004644054,0.00039984085,9.2954076e-7,0.40767574,0.0062783095,0.001364319,0.5397653,0.00037846898,0.00087074336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0112275705,0.0014470533,0.039587557,0.0015929017,0.00016703509,0.000020098843,0.5137561,0.021145113,0.004358711,0.06470123,0.34072784,0.0012688001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015806044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012193886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47506404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006530825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115689814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68044746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564925869","doi":"10.1017/s0012217316000676","title":"Getting the Baseline Right—or—Why I’m Right and Everyone Else is Wrong, in each of the Two Senses of ‘Why’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Baseline (sea); Philosophy; Dividend; Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02322308472191322,"score_gpt":0.29747906113543904,"score_spread":0.27425597641352584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564925869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613211,0.00027473678,0.00057163835,0.025564214,0.00014067905,0.00047325756,0.00016669455,0.00001983503,0.0114678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979595,0.00009177787,0.000090598056,0.0005872576,0.00015293706,0.000011935022,0.0000015270382,0.000004938182,0.0010995073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990717,0.00021998343,0.00021865664,0.00013682875,0.00019083178,0.00016200611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893326,0.00060521363,0.00012965094,0.0002383125,0.000059400372,0.000034161272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007685957,0.000065520384,0.00012251413,0.000023536262,0.0002276063,0.000014098593,0.00024927128,0.000044121818,0.00014269151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026787916,0.00002757418,0.0000466679,0.00022766777,0.00043655385,0.00008205657,0.00008271573,0.00007046711,0.0000053058243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016122962,0.0008541967,0.1279048,0.00011346419,0.00013528345,0.00001313396,0.08249638,0.00004686029,0.07054647,0.6029273,0.06317036,0.05163048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015534748,0.00005007801,0.06345928,0.00024227561,0.000063889085,0.000003048158,0.0016290443,0.00019487164,0.03434871,0.028455388,0.8696559,0.00034406083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008259783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019376477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80648553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023015895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078225174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565501628","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n1p1","title":"Comparative Study of Hire-purchase in Iran and English Common Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Business; Possession (linguistics); Payment; Law; Common law; English law; Debt; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.053750809646709134,"score_gpt":0.3649089069009958,"score_spread":0.31115809725428667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565501628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97742647,0.00007267921,0.0000050396698,0.00081356673,0.00003290416,0.00007688382,0.000009374433,0.0000015812839,0.021561526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966705,0.000039331528,0.000028020668,0.00008367118,0.00010607243,7.903692e-7,6.696062e-8,0.0000017913245,0.00007319235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994476,0.000070668124,0.00021358697,0.000044153378,0.00012464858,0.000099330224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952906,0.00012649367,0.00011854266,0.000046452482,0.00008414303,0.000095303105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030850567,0.000036998612,0.00015710016,0.000023292616,0.000121891506,0.000024586638,0.000067817426,0.000022709342,0.0000070432275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015754204,0.000024257322,0.000016385582,0.000041369844,0.0002843616,0.000110261724,0.000022903878,0.0000647491,2.0663312e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055825235,0.00016996778,0.005913828,0.0000025750965,0.000008550376,0.0000021836545,0.027396489,5.294822e-7,0.00006910168,0.9662853,0.000028369443,0.000117537595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074746,0.0019567474,0.084285624,0.000261295,0.0001230694,0.000011298192,0.18150413,0.000029064826,0.0010407711,0.21022896,0.5126897,0.00039471415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004885878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012707462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7560563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021644115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002189781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73860186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572655473","doi":"","title":"The Disposition of Human Remains and Organ Donation: Increasing Testamentary Freedom while Upholding the No Property Rule","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Property (philosophy); Disposition; Law; Estate planning; Settlor; Estate; Common law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10131306123383885,"score_gpt":0.34134805215230685,"score_spread":0.240034990918468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572655473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99151057,0.000031353506,0.00003942879,0.003402389,0.00009522136,0.0003530584,0.000020039688,0.000039540013,0.004508378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965512,0.00010354794,0.000034866254,0.00007236938,0.00017578635,0.0000020134655,0.0000078131325,0.0000118998805,0.0030404627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872565,0.00030272023,0.00016071896,0.00024488926,0.00032186654,0.00024412399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868417,0.00017899506,0.00028770266,0.00054494373,0.00019637999,0.00010780242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010480836,0.0001182937,0.00012177957,0.000053478056,0.0069204452,0.00085555203,0.0009904368,0.000078953344,0.000011998711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013613014,0.000077002005,0.000053930085,0.00013472192,0.0007930662,0.0013745558,0.00042269987,0.00025906725,0.000015424679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024718582,0.000039421888,0.9859666,0.000011154028,0.000023358298,0.0000056207573,0.0018232694,0.000001382116,0.0050385008,0.006387382,0.000002002913,0.000676546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000324314,0.000035344845,0.98394746,0.00009906314,0.000048555627,0.0000031068312,0.002045381,8.4759535e-7,0.00067292905,0.00040085378,0.012281641,0.00014048013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007941599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023138896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022344736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014930495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008560521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99468625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W257596894","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Relationships: Ensuring the Loyal Exercise of Judgement on Behalf of Another","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Judgement; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.05168469315605677,"score_gpt":0.30202445182586796,"score_spread":0.2503397586698112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W257596894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3337008,0.000032082116,0.0012418039,0.0054523684,0.00006525877,0.0003201145,0.000004302321,0.000028700648,0.65915453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555916,0.000014761059,0.00030913096,0.00007854562,0.000049328773,0.000012275069,5.804534e-7,0.0000033230117,0.0039728833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946904,0.00007539917,0.0001313537,0.00007190883,0.00017485468,0.00007746178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995074,0.00018739942,0.0000672894,0.00017978925,0.000040325303,0.000017765113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069249474,0.000032244687,0.000059519796,0.000017155573,0.0002145494,0.0000084602625,0.00015135345,0.000027355762,0.00023682737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007169612,0.00002143855,0.0000358433,0.0000963713,0.00010639703,0.000031962434,0.0000240912,0.0000551294,0.0000291011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004638833,0.00008816031,0.0063074687,0.0000064809683,0.000005835474,2.1661043e-8,0.005135151,0.00017559504,0.00024077327,0.9802764,0.0020557912,0.0057036616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055781554,0.00010835412,0.24191754,0.00014354284,0.00008568843,1.0225832e-7,0.009879558,0.00071359955,0.02061405,0.033089865,0.69257873,0.00031116628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015304352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060482643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9471865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011802063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022547432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25930938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582736669","doi":"10.7202/1038620ar","title":"Publicité des droits et prescription acquisitive : des liaisons dangereuses?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.04628779737563087,"score_gpt":0.32180928803265063,"score_spread":0.27552149065701975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582736669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6441919,0.002126466,0.001567542,0.020590795,0.000524712,0.00049315486,0.00023022572,0.00011850174,0.33015665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9230921,0.0027222966,0.0024732247,0.00038850176,0.0011963397,0.00017864536,0.000024377527,0.000041505675,0.069883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776447,0.00024825547,0.00032807924,0.0005123112,0.00026758164,0.0008793131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784917,0.00014836747,0.00038909927,0.00091153453,0.00027877497,0.0004230289],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009815978,0.00020050386,0.00030459717,0.000068950125,0.0030849872,0.0012114804,0.0011308147,0.00031371927,0.00055698963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006507933,0.00030688703,0.00021342818,0.00027144887,0.0019420305,0.0020766137,0.0003255726,0.00037988997,0.00060844905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011249713,0.00023545782,0.017962711,0.00015825804,0.00006018031,0.000022389177,0.012470538,0.00003287889,0.0005920809,0.9366512,0.002609737,0.029193379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044851628,0.0001080047,0.3148621,0.0007328838,0.00017027308,0.000041059062,0.0018466779,0.00069953274,0.00050950766,0.4247581,0.2552202,0.0006031611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00987895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009347048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51189303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007083579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027311873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582939754","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2905141","title":"From Babyselling to Boilerplate: Reflections on the Limits of the Infrastructures of the Market","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Polity; Law and economics; Underwriting; Black market; Property market; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.03610992550963973,"score_gpt":0.35063830225389303,"score_spread":0.3145283767442533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582939754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89558697,0.00013296538,0.00040411725,0.041196615,0.0004294625,0.00027952422,0.000019292944,0.0000071438194,0.06194389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99705863,0.00034382046,0.000032889246,0.00017844145,0.00037143246,0.0000047466183,1.0207781e-7,0.000005967432,0.0020039529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874425,0.00016545183,0.0001733253,0.000089920635,0.00031418764,0.00051283767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893665,0.00015921642,0.00032719012,0.00046201798,0.00007992056,0.000034998804],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011280364,0.000063958185,0.0000826371,0.000016427022,0.0027405357,0.00009344505,0.0013040797,0.000048212205,0.00008925311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039625686,0.000029849696,0.00012286704,0.00013649586,0.00021826162,0.0000679309,0.00007700953,0.00086306344,0.0000033893248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026716416,0.000029237603,0.0021368468,9.366705e-7,0.00007261882,4.593812e-8,0.0051754713,0.0002616686,0.004391754,0.98090315,0.0019074917,0.005094049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016931634,0.000059335813,0.06584133,0.00006750347,0.000052505933,0.0000041792655,0.007665497,0.000033476797,0.004739783,0.8448993,0.07636149,0.00010629659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003018633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020986404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13600388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017861025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010209688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584415349","doi":"10.82308/32329","title":"The irreducible core of the trust","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LSE Research Online","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.3127236345703143,"score_gpt":0.507409967473694,"score_spread":0.19468633290337972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584415349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00084383687,0.0023321726,0.0000014681918,0.02458716,0.00024941924,0.0008037409,0.00031927976,0.000020887761,0.97084206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009113419,0.0031060441,0.000032887772,0.000037447615,0.0018379433,0.00004096802,0.00003771683,0.000019985679,0.98577356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997494,0.00024774857,0.00022451616,0.00018425776,0.0013137724,0.0005357098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763924,0.00083683396,0.0001235776,0.0008238645,0.0004309351,0.00014552457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029082873,0.000093169976,0.00014499611,0.00004583657,0.0017260681,0.00007633562,0.0015182528,0.00019517889,0.00026003135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000663601,0.00004921439,0.00013620808,0.00036290134,0.001797711,0.000050918574,0.00045589247,0.0010135955,0.00011941491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057413763,0.00008489427,0.00007025725,0.00002127254,0.000021113576,3.0486655e-7,0.0011880454,7.353941e-7,0.00002523763,0.8301386,0.15872686,0.009716953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039159004,0.000009892358,0.00042197868,0.000047920596,0.000008708393,2.3190401e-7,0.00048496536,0.000007790928,0.000009952274,0.027524846,0.97138846,0.000056109646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001961396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007094912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8126616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024545635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002498326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584583480","doi":"10.5040/9781509909513.ch-013","title":"Legitimate Expectations in Canada: Soft Law and Tax Administration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soft law; Administration (probate law); Tax law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Double taxation; International law","score_opus":0.03015367588382838,"score_gpt":0.2605341547951771,"score_spread":0.23038047891134872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584583480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011900607,0.00005016767,0.00004340134,0.005626622,0.0001464524,0.0003197084,0.00022706461,0.000050573617,0.993417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44890168,0.000010138936,0.00011243211,0.0007084489,0.0003983226,0.000081174265,0.000043505286,0.000028449726,0.5497158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876165,0.00002621069,0.00027759044,0.00030399038,0.00036847024,0.00026210878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999203,0.00015143989,0.00017262904,0.00019874869,0.000109929024,0.0001642421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002524124,0.00015042434,0.00017452757,0.000065346656,0.00049019424,0.0010176334,0.0002511656,0.00017882699,0.00016176567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082976694,0.0001448045,0.00003570804,0.000016077487,0.00020075068,0.0006890899,0.00006632735,0.00027824333,0.0000184414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017073721,0.0000019426166,0.000011651104,0.000006424991,0.000005846965,0.000006478031,0.00092531234,1.4311172e-7,0.00000590723,0.9900907,0.0061908453,0.0027530123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010185824,0.0000050564377,0.00003588644,0.000083758,0.000009000393,0.0000013466463,0.00046470136,0.0000042716647,0.000010265799,0.037116077,0.9619764,0.00019138472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6828686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9557856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005062953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029790588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587732659","doi":"","title":"The Volenti Defence under Australian and Canadian Law: A Comparative View","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Tort; Common law; Law; Political science; Comparative law; Liability","score_opus":0.029842691373746056,"score_gpt":0.3144486417484906,"score_spread":0.2846059503747445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587732659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6253993,0.009350219,0.00085982366,0.20243022,0.00032068125,0.001198018,0.000016330425,0.000057604822,0.16036779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898853,0.0023241527,0.000017023754,0.00031237397,0.00011703995,0.0000135258515,6.484851e-7,0.000003558824,0.0073263953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982978,0.00009135986,0.00010884633,0.000088269306,0.00013867697,0.0012750406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952394,0.000049125778,0.00005262059,0.0000764605,0.00007641929,0.00022146164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074534456,0.00005929684,0.000064682295,0.000016605733,0.002201685,0.0003385437,0.00024382073,0.00003483697,0.00006363783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010021749,0.000041193496,0.000030913245,0.000109747336,0.00025843547,0.00019790739,0.000013669389,0.00060554297,0.00010506894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2777492e-7,0.000003594886,0.00018667252,2.825295e-7,0.000016725442,9.6522584e-8,0.0007509361,0.0000020433931,0.000007687965,0.99616086,0.0006310877,0.0022395754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006905467,0.000019652396,0.0016089677,0.0000050790863,0.000008547294,0.000013693302,0.017815696,0.000011280116,0.0000045404863,0.48307443,0.49729735,0.00007173141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3671079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96085143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59374356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005383007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021613606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588559877","doi":"","title":"You Can't Fire Me: The Problems with Wrongful Dismissal Damages in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Damages; Unfair dismissal; Law; Labour law; Context (archaeology); Warrant; Common law; Plaintiff; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08403024437334014,"score_gpt":0.3168355486805888,"score_spread":0.23280530430724863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588559877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849819,0.000035226716,0.000020608659,0.010672481,0.00010384389,0.0004299735,0.000043682307,0.000040091738,0.0036722259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98684454,0.000061820785,0.000007447991,0.00020803028,0.00008503174,0.000004564754,0.000006882762,0.00001810514,0.012763585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828416,0.00019533261,0.0001485113,0.00038209144,0.0004855203,0.00050440367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857455,0.00008122357,0.00021566851,0.00079217297,0.000100276615,0.00023613145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003868005,0.0001846968,0.00018615593,0.000057730205,0.0021587333,0.0006290096,0.0018934413,0.00008777413,0.000025408668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052170828,0.00014983298,0.00004413596,0.00023834949,0.00041036698,0.0010922424,0.00032900777,0.00048629838,0.000017689192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013567784,0.000024552513,0.9961995,0.000009646182,0.000016998183,0.00007999965,0.0017914508,0.00005537352,0.0000151759805,0.001240554,0.0000028031861,0.00055035984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043626694,0.000019575817,0.9517991,0.00007908416,0.000027249862,0.0000026372422,0.0037095398,8.682938e-7,0.00005104348,0.00010610059,0.0435324,0.00023614323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5772011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4213749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072496716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016474104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589260615","doi":"10.5430/elr.v6n2p1","title":"The Cult of Dignity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Linguistics Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Cult; Sociology; Stewardship (theology); Law; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Honor; Individualism; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.20535287773857808,"score_gpt":0.5194253883391381,"score_spread":0.31407251060056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589260615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008148401,0.00006497582,0.00002741004,0.00084127905,0.00078858243,0.00019080762,0.00002721035,0.000020619911,0.9898907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98564726,0.0002724897,0.00013058563,0.000004747828,0.003440543,0.000015388689,9.654968e-7,0.000004882825,0.010483108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986321,0.00019679613,0.00011697194,0.00010641112,0.0006423783,0.00030534013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311596,0.0009858845,0.000067404515,0.00059131166,0.0051392084,0.000100202014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047172084,0.0000324891,0.000056636694,0.000019428904,0.005587555,0.00031262924,0.0010860097,0.000048412763,0.000024089828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22067061,0.000023883991,0.00003176258,0.00009054596,0.0011878614,0.000023516108,0.00025264357,0.00031093103,0.000026887888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027599074,0.000027658003,0.0015648175,0.0000053109866,0.000005050077,6.039278e-7,0.0042954483,9.3958147e-7,0.000008783777,0.9731267,0.018752132,0.002209785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047524838,0.000008021237,0.0017232544,0.000006322834,0.000001523536,3.2304277e-9,0.0022938978,0.000021617458,0.00019486184,0.019586869,0.9760862,0.000029886978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004985034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034799697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056946767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026771572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99570704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589706160","doi":"","title":"Debtor-induced payments","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Personal property; Creditor; Security interest; Business; Entitlement (fair division); Debt; Payment; Collateral; Legislation; Uniform Commercial Code; Law and economics; Law; Finance; Economics; Property (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.046458767688263854,"score_gpt":0.3576727632583232,"score_spread":0.31121399557005935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589706160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035377436,0.012420734,0.0003273414,0.04349393,0.00023797693,0.0010452465,0.0000048505954,0.00020579385,0.93872637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95433193,0.018091418,0.0006332448,0.024387116,0.00033656988,0.0001241352,0.0000068460627,0.000013848655,0.002074916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909884,0.00015165894,0.00018574,0.00015702793,0.00020582233,0.00020088414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944484,0.000070019945,0.00006853714,0.0002535123,0.000042847394,0.00012024092],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054265547,0.000067644985,0.00015366703,0.000005822605,0.0003658844,0.000035338446,0.0002581807,0.00003900473,0.00037172856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118219985,0.00005656607,0.00007457193,0.00015776958,0.000060302016,0.000125644,0.000037193706,0.000082290215,0.0009888771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5562347e-7,0.000011971342,0.000029421508,0.00006962252,0.0000036126328,1.8710597e-7,0.00005924667,8.819394e-8,0.000019755038,0.9552548,0.0043922677,0.040158853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046388064,0.0000076014435,0.00005955012,0.00028121975,0.000020127343,3.1460385e-7,0.0000065574022,0.0000061842843,0.000018247696,0.0028699145,0.99660534,0.00007853304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024415425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012029347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003295151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034334775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590859374","doi":"10.7939/r3f766n31","title":"The codification of commercial law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Alberta Library","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Uniform Commercial Code; Obsolescence; Personal property; Negotiable instrument; Political science; Property (philosophy); Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01547546675863264,"score_gpt":0.22210852185438565,"score_spread":0.206633055095753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590859374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20511849,0.00001859457,0.00013693325,0.051406607,0.000036788577,0.0001082157,0.000008537625,0.0000158596,0.74315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797001,0.00012845384,0.00012775352,0.000043521322,0.00002205744,6.207016e-8,0.0000017659216,0.000001613223,0.019974701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973226,0.000042350086,0.000047289213,0.00004805524,0.00007046419,0.000059588372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943584,0.00034153578,0.0000605179,0.00011569098,0.000017208864,0.000029185367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005180035,0.000020099267,0.000038980193,0.0000085659,0.00035444775,0.000006034882,0.00027640534,0.000025766636,0.00020742745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013318907,0.000014021705,0.00003153369,0.000071788294,0.0005104926,0.00027785948,0.00004880259,0.000014888579,0.000017683038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010718776,0.000014507246,0.0019987696,0.0000010323254,0.0000044295043,4.3434532e-8,0.0031812955,8.895484e-8,0.0001308152,0.9865111,0.0050588236,0.003088368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009856057,0.000006658464,0.005887239,0.000006466077,0.0000045837824,2.0354522e-8,0.0014127514,0.0000015731098,0.0004891368,0.0028507703,0.98921704,0.000025183084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088715935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008246842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006306213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005952696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591772563","doi":"10.18384/2310-6794-2016-4-8-14","title":"BHASIN V HRYNEW - THE BASIS OF UNDERSTANDING GOOD FAITH -AS AN ORGANIZING PRINCIPLE IN CANADIAN COMMON LAW","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Jurisprudence)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Good faith; Basis (linear algebra); Faith; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03302920243979889,"score_gpt":0.27278039412411403,"score_spread":0.23975119168431513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591772563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.863552,0.000032095715,0.00018591386,0.1011604,0.00006551661,0.00046136056,0.00008881902,0.000024043515,0.034429893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99595404,0.00014983145,0.000117774325,0.00027452494,0.000023321536,6.577164e-7,0.0000013940609,0.0000089616215,0.0034695046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841934,0.00039927798,0.00018573359,0.00022118565,0.0004186711,0.00035578327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988189,0.0003456166,0.0001999602,0.00035772272,0.00009065812,0.00018717804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008303141,0.000106625295,0.00016339919,0.00007594457,0.0009869739,0.000027726921,0.0010577195,0.00007271819,0.00019171264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058141533,0.00007041715,0.000079178644,0.0004345265,0.0009739517,0.000110542904,0.00016909352,0.0001568713,0.000016171738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003386094,0.00005834401,0.010019508,0.000008343315,0.000019096917,0.0000060519487,0.0050972654,0.000043267377,0.0002561901,0.9832079,0.0010976365,0.00015254144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053721905,0.000054802265,0.013646807,0.00020183015,0.000029951494,0.0000029971864,0.015469413,0.000013443463,0.0008966577,0.017812466,0.9511215,0.00021292624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.758815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.769932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96539545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008701697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006776639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75911045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591938228","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jlw016","title":"Private Authority and the Role of Rights: A Reply","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Focus (optics); Relation (database); Action (physics); Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02681493462528991,"score_gpt":0.3498208490075742,"score_spread":0.3230059143822843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591938228","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031504016,0.7948118,0.000032746262,0.09088672,0.00011471472,0.001361771,0.000042001535,0.000047341367,0.081198916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.689173,0.30954334,0.0002223985,0.00029822363,0.000098802775,0.00007050564,2.1360988e-7,0.0000034948955,0.0005900453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989213,0.00020626678,0.00036225247,0.00013909013,0.00024163701,0.0001294493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998916,0.00044274307,0.00019496109,0.00022655609,0.00018503444,0.000034753815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015733035,0.00007502872,0.000378841,0.0000119162805,0.00031240922,0.000008389464,0.0002094447,0.000018691999,0.000022339433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007624145,0.000032031334,0.00009863312,0.00016991835,0.0012026358,0.00011475102,0.00013740336,0.000048372192,0.000006765114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007611043,0.00001699979,0.0006123642,0.0003585421,0.000058129866,1.5905158e-7,0.0012465683,5.6544356e-9,0.000059857426,0.98302716,0.001318757,0.0132938195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019488255,0.000014744999,0.00069169316,0.0015043054,0.00005863755,3.519327e-7,0.00032933208,2.3734911e-7,0.00019920325,0.028449386,0.9685058,0.0000514484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016978536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032266832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96718705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000232211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003817265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44311616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592884096","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016057","title":"Trust in Quebec and Czech Law: Autonomous Patrimonies?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01813549540509396,"score_gpt":0.28439729509663075,"score_spread":0.2662617996915368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592884096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14490362,0.031470396,0.0031243246,0.03121205,0.0005926233,0.0038285225,0.00020404434,0.00093711796,0.7837273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8957663,0.07957013,0.0071926555,0.0043605673,0.0008518511,0.000087441505,0.00003921167,0.0003198491,0.011812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99226046,0.0025967697,0.0019273947,0.0013011392,0.0006004603,0.001313758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958289,0.0005421663,0.0009769406,0.0017491961,0.00026795024,0.0006348139],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051900316,0.00065719924,0.0011421689,0.00020336323,0.00052542484,0.00019508087,0.0021197519,0.00019100678,0.0002950586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016485951,0.00057675876,0.00036484786,0.0010915904,0.0011117648,0.0008434499,0.0011293667,0.00075800373,0.00052805024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025592952,0.00018649484,0.0016819624,0.0015208423,0.00004991309,0.0001509821,0.001166238,0.000001712083,0.0037248463,0.9408566,0.0006056211,0.0500292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001021357,0.00011567427,0.008382341,0.0054306723,0.00011128069,0.00003450979,0.00011426296,0.00000899793,0.0009152304,0.0018303826,0.9812457,0.00078959746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037815883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024600402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98064005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013894457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031170185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593009053","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v6n1p1","title":"Abolishing the Crime of Public Nuisance and Modernising That of Public Indecency","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Business; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.47124426631773797,"score_gpt":0.5169081096011175,"score_spread":0.04566384328337958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593009053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33293968,0.0001912091,0.0002702434,0.048217054,0.00011541165,0.00017436198,0.00002457135,0.000009285162,0.61805815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982992,0.0001919525,0.000105630366,0.00003958294,0.00015427063,0.000015524722,0.0000017122572,0.0000046280547,0.0011875223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983223,0.00017624308,0.00014052255,0.00013993755,0.0010018053,0.00021916724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841166,0.0003664182,0.00013332813,0.0003030287,0.000713712,0.00007186982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031437723,0.000039062004,0.000071659684,0.00005740057,0.0013106143,0.0007391487,0.0013551348,0.000044585508,0.000106419815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013236525,0.000030041916,0.000031069187,0.00007354272,0.0015051814,0.00079564564,0.00040345907,0.00021386241,0.000005276345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018504278,0.000030414616,0.01216101,0.0000038652443,0.00001199225,2.4651195e-7,0.001202796,7.910445e-7,0.00038826242,0.978287,0.000098901066,0.007812879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003026005,0.000018456643,0.14028521,0.000062746134,0.0000038141911,0.0000013025705,0.0029719123,0.0009928613,0.002055637,0.18552075,0.6676675,0.00011720514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015106531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050763995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7927662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050396084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001920182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593491886","doi":"10.21991/c94h4w","title":"The Incremental Evolution of National Receivership Law and the Elusive Search for Federal Purpose","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Receivership; Legislation; Political science; Ultra vires; Statute of limitations; Bankruptcy; Doctrine","score_opus":0.03989411658067844,"score_gpt":0.3321334183834593,"score_spread":0.29223930180278085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593491886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014875381,0.0017075564,0.069899015,0.16149716,0.0019948033,0.005183474,0.0013983011,0.000114163966,0.7433301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980641,0.000114604314,0.00031881398,0.0004920714,0.00025118477,0.0002420024,0.0000300577,0.000004468023,0.00048268828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813664,0.00012660024,0.00035324326,0.00027517756,0.0006528004,0.0004555629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977092,0.00081094715,0.0002731799,0.00030385645,0.0007830054,0.000119794044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018663092,0.00014487558,0.00017982165,0.00004447563,0.021091396,0.0004707082,0.00067994604,0.00011406563,0.000020753328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010067186,0.00009989007,0.00016716581,0.00009292353,0.03043367,0.000662157,0.00025955852,0.00018577934,0.000015554448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018771659,0.000032769287,0.0033120338,0.000006888519,0.000052128977,3.200075e-7,0.0002441246,0.000070527596,0.00008368556,0.9945713,0.0010955865,0.00034289126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004364548,0.000044630247,0.0017971789,0.00007180067,0.000051006584,0.00002460303,0.011245769,0.0010171415,0.00036040886,0.44378948,0.5369312,0.0003022227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034871665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067668143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98318875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038553472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020416046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594172847","doi":"","title":"Personal property securities legislation: Analysing the new lexicon","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Personal property; Property (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Tangible property; Lexicon; Supreme court; Linguistics; Sociology; Property law; Law and economics; Political science; Property rights; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04429371174990055,"score_gpt":0.3279172351920104,"score_spread":0.28362352344210984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594172847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025806364,0.06044691,0.00101617,0.24583535,0.00010727699,0.0007661155,0.0000036428426,0.000111022004,0.6914555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91144013,0.035105996,0.00060487323,0.026453398,0.0017344656,0.0000829951,0.00001415075,0.000019178106,0.024544787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998984,0.0002159974,0.00019944865,0.00015737422,0.00026403877,0.00017914674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994615,0.00010318573,0.00008869667,0.00020378282,0.000058658712,0.00008422171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008096087,0.000077975084,0.00015968077,0.0000070613805,0.0008423487,0.00012217124,0.00025734073,0.000033263364,0.00048745735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106424,0.000041729854,0.00011825891,0.00023253316,0.0002094654,0.00023670813,0.000034569217,0.00012517232,0.00015804861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.4158506e-7,0.0000051454695,0.000019944277,0.000057924597,0.000008107078,1.15030524e-7,0.0010892086,0.00000113281,0.0000036791882,0.9506019,0.011875092,0.036337435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003602802,0.0000056412064,0.00003119267,0.00036089146,0.00005233353,0.0000010873579,0.00010823031,0.00013936132,0.000004117521,0.0057000383,0.9934837,0.00007737451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066348906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006206752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031991483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001381204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594432468","doi":"","title":"Re Indalex: The confluence of pension, insolvency, and fiduciary law.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Insolvency; Duty; Law; Supreme court; Creditor; Pension; Business; Bankruptcy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.051694270192047136,"score_gpt":0.3481389749984826,"score_spread":0.2964447048064355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594432468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9330189,0.0064461757,0.000043409003,0.043258086,0.0002428685,0.00015764486,0.00001799787,0.0000113876595,0.016803524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584585,0.0027739266,0.00012440287,0.00040937573,0.00019829423,0.0000023408807,4.6020695e-8,0.0000046301284,0.00064110657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989704,0.000105551044,0.00035011314,0.000087387234,0.00034230854,0.00014422306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853086,0.00045263156,0.0003668482,0.0001198209,0.00046915386,0.000060669427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009672007,0.00007366634,0.00021704254,0.00002824865,0.00056485494,0.000029452536,0.00026232912,0.000035694185,0.000025098389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043681028,0.00003549781,0.00006570829,0.00012811106,0.0010597116,0.00029650723,0.00011995907,0.000120900855,0.0000030666615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008848306,0.00014193049,0.017815713,0.000050104016,0.00033219467,0.000033165878,0.05086605,0.0000045809516,0.006113061,0.89383364,0.019277241,0.011443848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000443268,0.00014765104,0.026285263,0.00021959528,0.000064988155,0.000015687234,0.016235242,4.730441e-7,0.0011451185,0.012845878,0.94246703,0.00012982458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005460632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033545047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92318976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031895575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012172674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43444648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25946021","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0126311","title":"Remarks on David Daube’s Lectures on Sale, with Special Attention to the Liber Homo and Res Extra Commercium","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Section (typography); Subject (documents); Value (mathematics); Classics; Special section; Law; History; Library science; Political science; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.009162149377698726,"score_gpt":0.27714206438183975,"score_spread":0.26797991500414103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25946021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8720682,0.00013108224,0.00063947676,0.07361998,0.00037402075,0.00040373413,0.0000049199916,0.000031175736,0.05272738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909596,0.00040392386,0.000069012785,0.0008209147,0.0032788275,0.000012775822,0.0000019956994,0.000014353024,0.004438626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998268,0.00011514356,0.00013534968,0.00018955272,0.0003641833,0.0009277684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943936,0.00009935311,0.00008451706,0.00019612654,0.00006030116,0.00012034562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013194201,0.00011116311,0.00009813158,0.00005452641,0.0013604637,0.00023132906,0.0003188822,0.00007487476,0.00007086043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006869268,0.000067819215,0.00004848336,0.00018897302,0.00014241181,0.00010815904,0.000027138618,0.00184639,0.000038325416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015792424,0.00009090127,0.0012525637,0.0000012300547,0.000039190352,0.0000015658915,0.0022472264,0.000024617426,0.00067591737,0.9524603,0.0057978434,0.03725071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005333203,0.0007022175,0.039205287,0.000031401767,0.000043343345,0.00007287838,0.0031160102,0.000008894427,0.00010053191,0.06690937,0.88901377,0.00026299318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004979379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089991145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8855509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018419183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060420675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594609880","doi":"","title":"Bungled Police Emergency Calls and the Problems with Unique Duties of Care","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Duty of care; Duty; Law; Legislature; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.006708602276208599,"score_gpt":0.2580926934299996,"score_spread":0.25138409115379096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594609880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9146937,0.0067570996,0.004469022,0.031020958,0.00008144619,0.0007099614,0.000009933148,0.000039121773,0.04221873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98528284,0.011731567,0.000021450105,0.000017320464,0.0001182182,0.0000116229985,1.6363722e-7,0.000005720519,0.0028110861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988617,0.00011209428,0.00014155453,0.00007622605,0.00017335959,0.0006351012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995501,0.00005203858,0.00012231062,0.000087780034,0.00014027605,0.000047477675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081968156,0.00005707387,0.000092989336,0.000021534028,0.00043078914,0.000017535198,0.00019973972,0.000031831016,0.000032313597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025128671,0.000025599433,0.0000371727,0.00012207127,0.00029448819,0.00010283267,0.00002092354,0.00026375457,0.000002056267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027519498,0.00000632922,0.0018778116,0.0000034774137,0.0000317341,3.8080742e-8,0.010353949,0.0000012923289,0.00017689525,0.9846685,0.000017268385,0.0028352162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030469187,0.00051378226,0.0020891733,0.00010759527,0.0001185523,0.000056570792,0.10337697,0.000004858241,0.0004082698,0.8032228,0.086733416,0.00032110367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007228581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10143491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18144567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017830067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001186637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595245854","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016061","title":"The Rule in <i>Saunders v. Vautier</i> and the Czech Trust Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.015752505093699343,"score_gpt":0.2766899404914333,"score_spread":0.26093743539773395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595245854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021746555,0.045226958,0.0013935695,0.116792135,0.0005463616,0.003497407,0.00007241523,0.00039822754,0.8103264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76474875,0.2140101,0.0017522655,0.0111204935,0.0008015125,0.00014502087,0.000016104452,0.0002595482,0.0071461718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910749,0.004317758,0.0017233257,0.0009631775,0.0006895564,0.0012312357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945521,0.0018832737,0.0009089164,0.002027265,0.00023515681,0.00039328914],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011377081,0.0005433042,0.00087896216,0.0000782018,0.001401439,0.00026745466,0.0030428218,0.00012735455,0.00011019587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024637724,0.00032559288,0.00040520664,0.0010467512,0.0035377862,0.0004809173,0.0012449175,0.0008553784,0.00031152726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055887736,0.00008853674,0.00035730383,0.0005183708,0.000057006233,0.000033065997,0.0010933303,0.0000018339283,0.0008631776,0.9768772,0.0007162123,0.019338068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016406692,0.000048460104,0.0019925984,0.0026860216,0.00011493751,0.000031217332,0.00015266317,0.000012327825,0.00034696274,0.008727496,0.98377126,0.0004753718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003392129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020840597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98305506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006842964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017705816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595496218","doi":"","title":"Pure economic loss and non-adopters: comparing liability in Australia, Canada, and the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Liability; Business; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance","score_opus":0.017211305262406378,"score_gpt":0.23331850543293495,"score_spread":0.21610720017052856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595496218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99465466,0.00006299777,0.00004906665,0.0024651147,0.000063131956,0.0001278334,0.000010171584,0.0000058464752,0.002561161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866545,0.000045831424,0.00010236935,0.000021714977,0.000040346058,4.5297296e-7,0.0000050959725,0.0000012813897,0.0011174799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994945,0.00006431672,0.00007457461,0.00010708385,0.00011774286,0.0001417686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995992,0.00009897238,0.00006735528,0.00008912602,0.00003316617,0.000112148045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000307683,0.000054689168,0.00010457141,0.000022294662,0.0007334186,0.000021867798,0.00012617752,0.00004210668,0.000010075804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000144279,0.000054473432,0.00001997322,0.00008037967,0.0010583204,0.00019697999,0.00006831756,0.00009998531,0.0000010818112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008779589,0.00005869315,0.8635152,0.000034839075,0.000034745033,0.000014024352,0.03383064,0.0059200707,0.000027590557,0.0958771,0.0005414015,0.000057920777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012728779,0.00000984439,0.8289929,0.00004767917,0.000039345436,0.000011302523,0.038436856,0.002943265,0.000046641744,0.0007926947,0.12719423,0.00021237474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94717526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8204252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12675005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029185263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026290247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5640937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596288791","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttx019","title":"When the music stops: the UKSC judgment in Akers, applying the bona fide purchaser rule and offshore trusts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Adidas (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Supreme court; Equity (law); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.049192847927912016,"score_gpt":0.3161396334232771,"score_spread":0.2669467854953651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596288791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8505175,0.001096386,0.000024585639,0.08724479,0.00030449044,0.0024495898,0.000027629289,0.00007142905,0.058263596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930481,0.00023373203,0.000080307545,0.0011029411,0.00045224477,0.0007091632,0.0000029595403,0.000018676375,0.0043519214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817187,0.0002230983,0.00028066992,0.00034189195,0.0004912471,0.00049121404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826705,0.00036724875,0.0002129593,0.0010091597,0.000045100696,0.00009844776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015684654,0.0001909517,0.00019554365,0.000031539865,0.004300517,0.000824059,0.0014551599,0.00010125421,0.0002533684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001985521,0.00009623095,0.00009033333,0.00011044644,0.0011245954,0.00031254854,0.00036750597,0.00040090416,0.000045515895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076088225,0.00021571625,0.058805443,0.0000418252,0.00012396944,0.000015347397,0.15810287,0.00013431504,0.00015909805,0.5077111,0.025923558,0.24869068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004764324,0.000016923817,0.13816576,0.000038559592,0.000051940235,0.0000029693244,0.024667101,0.0003117097,0.00005513402,0.017171059,0.8188131,0.0002293061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010611851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028782312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79288954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090862406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013044324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99699575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596415548","doi":"10.1002/iir.1271","title":"Jersey Insolvency and Asset TrackingA.Dessain and M.Wilkins (5th Ed) (2016, Key Haven Publications, Oxford), cviii and 583 Pages, £125, ISBN 978‐1‐901614‐67‐1","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Key (lock); Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.06006918545934287,"score_gpt":0.3766426012085724,"score_spread":0.31657341574922954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596415548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039996635,0.29040286,0.0013919622,0.34135103,0.0015300765,0.004317494,0.0009671262,0.00042201116,0.3196208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4139492,0.57716346,0.0017873892,0.001645148,0.0004641969,0.00026528203,0.000109012,0.00003097482,0.004585351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977642,0.00015327841,0.00059349183,0.0006088526,0.00051872095,0.00036144545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980135,0.00018124671,0.0005668495,0.0006126907,0.00033228437,0.00029344927],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013207714,0.00025718362,0.00039177077,0.00010926173,0.0015202942,0.0008874696,0.0009163699,0.00014818915,0.0003669166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001173581,0.00023929957,0.00010314971,0.00013066905,0.0006019414,0.0013161339,0.00037264387,0.00031893738,0.00004345748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011653816,0.00034132204,0.04110118,0.0006268648,0.00016171436,0.000009776535,0.00172627,5.6712656e-7,0.00008498631,0.68126214,0.07163116,0.20304234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029214972,0.00002576499,0.057264302,0.0008113772,0.00006306554,0.000013242896,0.00012727379,0.00006344411,0.0000044302387,0.0048914687,0.93616974,0.0002737558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016508929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001495665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86453855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111792804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002522899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597833929","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4370","title":"SCORCHED EARTH: THE USE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS TO STIFLE COMPETITION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Covenant; Humanities; Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Political science; Business; Welfare economics; Economics; Art; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.20526493107737948,"score_gpt":0.393474131765862,"score_spread":0.18820920068848251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597833929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96270794,0.000043543972,0.0027428963,0.0043181553,0.00028136504,0.0010600068,0.000090300564,0.0000345981,0.028721223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971142,0.000017167173,0.0012104023,0.0005002165,0.00029189824,0.000030253263,0.000002178036,0.000008217744,0.00082549884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990132,0.000101494945,0.00019445269,0.00011902502,0.00033167395,0.00024015241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989017,0.00038624892,0.00011833628,0.00024673773,0.00018662302,0.00016032558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036652744,0.00006647954,0.00012335405,0.00006392893,0.00020956314,0.00006930752,0.00043061134,0.000045430115,0.00010517204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000507974,0.0000526956,0.000038804686,0.0004772981,0.0001268767,0.00048524787,0.00016321341,0.00008455139,0.000092830924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048611162,0.001110849,0.03484311,0.00023735953,0.00013131807,0.0000017306897,0.0676231,0.0059998906,0.021695556,0.8402161,0.017800793,0.009854091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027152948,0.00008932275,0.43330157,0.00013658484,0.00019019048,3.7962596e-7,0.0033322508,0.00007865273,0.008323508,0.0002968069,0.55374014,0.00023908677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034243546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004282523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83991927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000319368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009940392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5176623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599707691","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1088","title":"Misfeasance, Nonfeasance, and the Self-Interested Attorney","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power of attorney; Fiduciary; Estate; Law; Duty; Duty of care; Liability; Estate planning; Compensation (psychology); Business; Political science; Psychology; Health care","score_opus":0.01309679819789186,"score_gpt":0.28676134777251344,"score_spread":0.2736645495746216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599707691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022370473,0.00014284445,0.000120049066,0.012693986,0.00047246015,0.00019156629,0.0000045238,0.000060877395,0.96394324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957689,0.00026586783,0.0011180217,0.0006279986,0.0010425441,0.000012798407,5.607765e-7,0.000010555082,0.0011527472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989478,0.00013491398,0.00020066857,0.00014509994,0.0002827163,0.00028879408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915504,0.00015129129,0.00013555495,0.00019636074,0.0001265982,0.00023515554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010127868,0.00009555188,0.00013364166,0.00001848415,0.0021273433,0.00044853782,0.0004169305,0.00008570826,0.00025470514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007716074,0.00006256117,0.00008323406,0.00011396284,0.0006642987,0.00024375808,0.000046234127,0.0006441784,0.000055140532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015286336,0.00003284429,0.00060096564,0.0000019379413,0.00001763063,0.0000028549557,0.0010735387,9.0733124e-7,0.00017849829,0.99587095,0.0011411157,0.0010634974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010823903,0.0000123835725,0.002494849,0.000014471537,0.000032004235,0.00007529084,0.00054135773,0.000099322955,0.000066681765,0.074824646,0.9206199,0.00013666708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013164142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21781619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97339845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023805938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011118055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602339526","doi":"10.4000/droitcultures.4094","title":"Saisir les enjeux de la maternité de substitution sous le prisme de la théorie générale du contrat : quelles perspectives en France et au Québec ?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et Cultures","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011040066406632834,"score_gpt":0.3162444392463499,"score_spread":0.305204372839717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602339526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84480274,0.0048005967,0.002485746,0.062435865,0.00011970898,0.00026939003,0.00007800066,0.000103858496,0.08490411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884506,0.0033767188,0.00072636286,0.00027416766,0.0006431443,0.00007317806,0.0000075549165,0.00002116111,0.0064271027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980411,0.00075574295,0.00018478202,0.0003314317,0.00021213618,0.00047481668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988044,0.00038688583,0.00020658468,0.00030792356,0.00011812187,0.0001761076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012022707,0.00020055276,0.00021789578,0.00001992855,0.0021586134,0.0007404542,0.0006328752,0.00037312502,0.00008549343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006330269,0.00019982897,0.00014539003,0.00006294989,0.0018595185,0.00047981323,0.0000816043,0.00044054486,0.000043208296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014254316,0.00019329261,0.03949733,0.000032727865,0.000041624287,0.000018722772,0.08889547,0.00023643443,0.0030859748,0.8665676,0.00087945856,0.0005370787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073513354,0.000039270413,0.41453302,0.00017574146,0.000090508314,0.00005607233,0.04989403,0.00027032715,0.0030472674,0.19129641,0.3393424,0.00051981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3910775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10474326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6752712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005781919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001936984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602648738","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016064","title":"Position of a Trustee: The Capacity to Be a Trustee and a Trustees Duty of Care","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Czech; Duty of care; Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Law; Business; Political science; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02538594827369817,"score_gpt":0.28842246814378125,"score_spread":0.2630365198700831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602648738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60940844,0.018639693,0.002354686,0.037153684,0.0003881584,0.005189337,0.00086056965,0.00029178898,0.3257136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729213,0.019082304,0.00496979,0.0019465149,0.00031425385,0.000053506035,0.000021942287,0.00012775934,0.00056258903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993365,0.0025735071,0.0017492598,0.0008425779,0.0007163468,0.0007533267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521965,0.0006861415,0.0013044195,0.0017198396,0.0006412684,0.00042867704],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038090686,0.0004929251,0.0010958718,0.000158648,0.00043455797,0.00006079145,0.001990604,0.00012856827,0.00022905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022533517,0.00035929767,0.00045455786,0.0009999006,0.0011685936,0.00036856736,0.0009328637,0.00044768475,0.00009448689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009104814,0.00022594005,0.0011477554,0.0051609194,0.00013106591,0.000021985903,0.010377609,0.0000053501994,0.029071493,0.93219745,0.0008439429,0.020725463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009698549,0.00049344933,0.010319387,0.008302071,0.00038853672,0.000045867437,0.00070130767,0.0000061197143,0.010455228,0.00076868397,0.96691614,0.0006333612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017454394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000116551906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9660722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005571115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017331268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603622038","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016060","title":"Trust as a Legislative Challenge: Bipolar Relation vs Quasi-Corporate Status? Basic Trust Models in Legal Practice, Theory, and Legislation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Mandate; Legislature; Express trust; German; Transparency (behavior); Law; Trust law; Legal practice; Political science; Law and economics; Civil code; Business; Legislation; Simple (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03107136426497374,"score_gpt":0.30130106687366287,"score_spread":0.2702297026086891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603622038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059284758,0.040283274,0.021526996,0.027814928,0.0004416796,0.0043869806,0.00018349216,0.0005975254,0.8454804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78980947,0.19637588,0.0055391993,0.0020206654,0.00064071745,0.00009200859,0.000076993274,0.00029086292,0.005154222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867488,0.0076024774,0.0020493874,0.0014463158,0.0008630175,0.0012899805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353313,0.0014510977,0.002303798,0.0015512276,0.0005588846,0.00060186745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011876048,0.00072484295,0.0010925015,0.0003474275,0.0006075414,0.0002280565,0.0013334468,0.00023255117,0.0002166636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061949897,0.00065199716,0.0003140976,0.0014700419,0.0009588592,0.003183991,0.0007219892,0.0010416647,0.00039902673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020816998,0.00039109492,0.000799492,0.0006956161,0.00008655561,0.000113863396,0.0036868623,0.000025302534,0.0010586284,0.95564723,0.00018946339,0.037097745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015172368,0.0004038842,0.0040316316,0.004574832,0.00022709108,0.000051854287,0.00027676014,0.00019103033,0.00017749888,0.015505805,0.9721787,0.00086368737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040321235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010746176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015708586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045871068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604136451","doi":"10.1177/0022018317694715","title":"Unlawful and Dangerous","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Law; Criminal law; English law; Constructive; Criminal code; Political science; Order (exchange); Common law; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.061549430636889876,"score_gpt":0.37031241595851433,"score_spread":0.30876298532162444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604136451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412879,0.00034499363,0.00024622754,0.020043558,0.00014827267,0.00006006656,0.0000017448965,0.0000048122693,0.23786244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838084,0.0001660998,0.00021200198,0.00023276608,0.0003698333,2.8878688e-7,2.9116197e-8,0.0000023638256,0.00063576706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957,0.000052426032,0.000098146214,0.00002629457,0.000165319,0.00008777351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994404,0.00007288541,0.00020141607,0.00014213056,0.00007823894,0.000064931315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080775406,0.000030176883,0.000062396306,0.000006913462,0.0014657788,0.0001412293,0.000396675,0.00001910217,0.000022673348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007207576,0.00001811354,0.000026335432,0.000010756909,0.0005409711,0.00020224186,0.000045696524,0.00010480615,0.0000066764583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001891576,0.00001344681,0.000088046276,0.0000030385902,0.0000074535974,0.0000055044097,0.0064948485,0.000001171446,0.00019227563,0.9867157,0.0005622103,0.0058974195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018090896,0.00007020096,0.0055599706,0.000021002312,0.00012468072,0.00007476145,0.0050807805,0.0000039652114,0.00031423036,0.026387,0.9621185,0.0000640201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002289072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013307789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96155626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012746067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040490773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607808881","doi":"","title":"On The Sufficient Conditions for Trust: A Criticism of Katherine Hawley's Commitment-Based Account of Trust","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07349767316554584,"score_gpt":0.3609509046014911,"score_spread":0.28745323143594526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607808881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484179,0.000034961824,0.0017005408,0.014336593,0.0002954197,0.0010538517,0.00048682356,0.00003267781,0.033641223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861634,0.0000019424485,0.00026935144,0.00034638442,0.000080377424,0.00015472485,0.000017110564,0.000006227896,0.00050756964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992986,0.000044638644,0.0001850553,0.00009692965,0.00023710504,0.00013772534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900955,0.00038461387,0.00010606992,0.00022682275,0.00021148202,0.00006146089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000569321,0.00005712726,0.000111479574,0.000024357454,0.00020593699,0.000017202037,0.00022628551,0.000037310547,0.00015643674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026527306,0.00004122395,0.00007080045,0.00015401527,0.00026027145,0.000033117496,0.000017104549,0.000046881825,0.0000123348755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151334525,0.00023479988,0.00013040747,0.000007026068,0.000008974947,8.460556e-8,0.002255366,0.0000711128,0.00041540182,0.98986405,0.00692485,0.00007278555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018343825,0.00047603672,0.0017898772,0.00005836581,0.00008791524,2.3170303e-7,0.019330122,0.0020944912,0.007618765,0.09545046,0.8710258,0.00023353314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083718554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029757633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8944136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051481256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020470192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17128727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26087353","doi":"10.29173/alr26","title":"From Right to Wrong: Grounding a \"Right\" to Privacy in the \"Wrongs\" of Tort","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Tort; Right to privacy; Privacy laws of the United States; Law; The Right to Privacy; Expectation of privacy; Work (physics); Internet privacy; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Information privacy; Liability; Engineering","score_opus":0.06632087572559733,"score_gpt":0.37209857996107476,"score_spread":0.30577770423547745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26087353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11927259,0.012716388,0.00015188644,0.14370388,0.00031943223,0.0038707533,0.000021550848,0.000033782984,0.7199097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882076,0.0011103582,0.00065727026,0.0075149466,0.00029584512,0.00022601656,0.00001041965,0.000010789249,0.001966798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987565,0.00018449259,0.0003109332,0.00021118883,0.00031989365,0.00021697425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989474,0.00029529294,0.00007765384,0.00043931138,0.00005824931,0.00018209223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091631984,0.00009007763,0.00024829642,0.00001590906,0.00014246006,0.00005472768,0.0007213352,0.000036367666,0.00027699818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038018945,0.00005835919,0.00006784729,0.00050839566,0.00005774254,0.00014434977,0.00010208824,0.000079401776,0.0005042209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024087897,0.00006428114,0.00045773614,0.000061457176,0.00000878872,0.0000014550593,0.011249716,9.4767427e-7,0.00001457803,0.9679368,0.017970901,0.0022308899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057036435,0.000014925901,0.00029573237,0.00048631034,0.0000230291,3.3782894e-7,0.0002227838,7.40592e-7,0.000017348117,0.002994524,0.99579823,0.00008897501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16842592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10028267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97782737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090885704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104193176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91613483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609703429","doi":"10.29173/alr494","title":"The Crown's Duty to Consult Aboriginal People","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Certainty; Treaty; Law; Legal certainty; Subject (documents); Crown (dentistry); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016029531343375956,"score_gpt":0.3516439561028977,"score_spread":0.33561442475952175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609703429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014945845,0.021221649,0.000028803088,0.059318062,0.00017366445,0.00091464026,0.0000036676436,0.000024967458,0.91681993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68803304,0.19318518,0.0006806341,0.037752222,0.00034911858,0.0008138632,0.000008144691,0.000034737957,0.07914306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999073,0.0001608543,0.0001758136,0.00015707998,0.00017881526,0.00025440755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989446,0.00045886435,0.000051389892,0.00031067044,0.00008563829,0.00014886835],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064468343,0.00007296119,0.00013822601,0.000003710764,0.0010696865,0.000094859955,0.00029514616,0.000026288852,0.00045762552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004462077,0.000047790698,0.00006651597,0.00035816486,0.00012244994,0.00007068422,0.0000152183275,0.00007645172,0.0012640356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4063248e-7,0.000009937456,0.000104769526,0.000026357178,0.000003965297,1.3051832e-7,0.00034290715,1.3655068e-7,0.0000015199474,0.9841221,0.014175355,0.0012123622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003253287,0.0000047223784,0.00010834899,0.00010266957,0.000018959634,9.743717e-7,0.00005257657,2.1698399e-7,0.000007418889,0.0008962774,0.9986982,0.00007713612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0355694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20184544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033712844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016962306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609705142","doi":"","title":"The Stolen Generation: A Breach of Fiduciary Duties? Canadian v Australian Approaches to Fiduciary Duties","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Law; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.25068757749584153,"score_gpt":0.2995491766440529,"score_spread":0.048861599148211365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609705142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5505628,0.00041077958,0.00026909777,0.16910039,0.00013656252,0.001183774,0.00020369538,0.000046735327,0.27808616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643592,0.00018999871,0.00062935275,0.000025352569,0.00006075314,0.000001686096,0.000009497549,0.000005576534,0.034718562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985298,0.0003074335,0.00008983334,0.0001997238,0.00045158237,0.0004216077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989918,0.00012971483,0.00006197233,0.0003169289,0.00014923065,0.00035035613],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011924525,0.00007667862,0.00013529378,0.0001440651,0.0016416891,0.000055691868,0.00052592764,0.000090579066,0.0003184007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014741012,0.0000751985,0.000073226925,0.000545859,0.0005412425,0.0001744969,0.0000731304,0.00017244046,0.000031137497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043909826,0.00009134796,0.0065727253,0.000037120903,0.000095945994,0.000011412817,0.046893474,0.0002484411,0.00021993087,0.82621557,0.11496125,0.004608879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019542148,0.00005193867,0.0072437227,0.000016292417,0.00001432611,0.000001031816,0.07162374,0.00009945442,0.00019803492,0.0012541583,0.9191639,0.00013798049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7880341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8249614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001957776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011793325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609828263","doi":"10.18769/ijasos.309488","title":"RECOVERING NON-PECUNIARY LOSSES IN BREACH OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT UNDER MALAYSIAN LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Atomic Energy of Canada Limited","keywords":"Dismissal; Employment contract; Reputation; Plaintiff; Embarrassment; Statutory law; Labour law; Prerogative; Law; Pleading; Unfair dismissal; Business; Political science; Work (physics); Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04087479915470227,"score_gpt":0.43145253760068103,"score_spread":0.39057773844597876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609828263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77481645,0.0005120257,0.00046823616,0.011795183,0.0014997309,0.00019167093,0.000022460565,0.000007700629,0.21068656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736655,0.00089206983,0.00084001984,0.00017496475,0.00061901123,0.0000053467584,6.052333e-7,0.0000047699614,0.000096676304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980263,0.000074402145,0.0005565536,0.00017501871,0.0009122843,0.00025541926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854684,0.00019625814,0.0008525364,0.000094167786,0.00025308432,0.000057089528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015949607,0.00009641265,0.00024118011,0.00015204649,0.0006461382,0.00024994227,0.001579554,0.000065634646,0.00007791783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022840322,0.00008768966,0.000107179876,0.00019535748,0.0013472228,0.002130559,0.00012256383,0.00020811957,0.0000027403535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000838287,0.0003479412,0.12730396,0.000008711123,0.000035247256,0.00003201689,0.0069100126,0.0028360072,0.00063935237,0.8329437,0.00007004776,0.028789213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029053234,0.0003141055,0.5202563,0.00077426725,0.000030377958,0.000022698934,0.022317037,0.00040111368,0.0017639041,0.26159543,0.18890692,0.0007125294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057258666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01839281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57134825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026526116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032805075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610808217","doi":"","title":"Investor Loss from Securities Non-disclosure: A Statutory Presumption of Causation on the Canadian Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Causation; Statutory law; Project commissioning; Legislation; Business; Law; Publishing; Order (exchange); Statutory interpretation; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03991898861520887,"score_gpt":0.24410372532078797,"score_spread":0.2041847367055791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610808217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95635206,0.000042130072,0.0007884484,0.0071000485,0.000043476415,0.0001341388,0.00015070396,0.0000087629405,0.035380226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984339,0.000045435794,0.00041595552,0.00016273967,0.000107686414,3.481077e-8,0.0000051797156,0.0000021815913,0.0008269228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993768,0.00006376432,0.000097650685,0.0000749239,0.0002558331,0.00013104882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942976,0.00003260204,0.00015680717,0.00010039597,0.000095600146,0.00018482404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019757016,0.000051768366,0.00008235489,0.000048162823,0.0010750429,0.000035662797,0.0002458087,0.000063136096,0.00008568415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014848911,0.000047221845,0.00006374227,0.0000718723,0.00027199145,0.00021051688,0.000010793279,0.00016466164,0.000005658822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039813076,0.000035505327,0.00091130915,0.000003202094,0.000030103089,0.000004682338,0.17572409,0.002414614,0.00012223619,0.8169591,0.003195259,0.000560072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027255511,0.0003708315,0.11951556,0.00045796053,0.00031738114,0.0000041127014,0.19754915,0.005029073,0.0005004971,0.29058132,0.38215098,0.0007975916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39854732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7177358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5263778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001951979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000677066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82684696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612471374","doi":"","title":"Lesser Expectations by Vic Parsons","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Island writer","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.04910826830668639,"score_gpt":0.3474716399617904,"score_spread":0.298363371655104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612471374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25500354,0.00044183707,0.0026624268,0.026006214,0.00024491292,0.00028886052,0.00011989069,0.00015086606,0.71508145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98044014,0.000010972707,0.00018760511,0.00031131573,0.0002048907,0.00003644461,0.00001821303,0.0000051086504,0.018785283],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994931,0.000035063375,0.00007410182,0.00010208882,0.00014756773,0.00014803032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996735,0.000030705527,0.000020890024,0.00010768165,0.00005230439,0.000114942246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010761954,0.00004274798,0.000050054306,0.000016471824,0.00022599006,0.00008900843,0.000121329365,0.000039149047,0.00018923999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027675374,0.000037087855,0.000024255462,0.00012383144,0.000063184045,0.00012573792,0.000016291164,0.000052262607,0.00046848567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032308378,0.00009272156,0.0068455385,0.0000015624057,0.000010623724,0.0000016336278,0.05095157,0.0000038286703,0.00015691026,0.07614863,0.86417615,0.0016076076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013761947,0.0000060311945,0.0004007251,0.0000021082578,0.000004365907,2.80789e-7,0.005331087,0.000016816377,0.000040819745,0.0027025105,0.99128985,0.00006775851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007573245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024883747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7254366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025561358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006526935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60215914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613895645","doi":"","title":"L'eau, chose commune : un statut juridique à confirmer","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Chose; Commission; Public administration","score_opus":0.030500846700034837,"score_gpt":0.3044705962452377,"score_spread":0.27396974954520287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613895645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005270789,0.31311107,0.0000013700313,0.38869783,0.00013499802,0.0006659344,0.00012764112,0.00001442925,0.29671964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097977415,0.7280006,0.00007149853,0.046651274,0.00042433295,0.00011427521,0.000032093572,0.000029650288,0.12669887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795073,0.0006156162,0.00035239846,0.00021506597,0.00021736146,0.0006488324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982891,0.000100334815,0.00008747293,0.00073825964,0.000077748075,0.00070706307],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011865088,0.0001849533,0.00031817198,0.000018732282,0.0015554909,0.00010834427,0.0008652194,0.000113613394,0.05771674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000467829,0.00014733612,0.00016351693,0.00055762276,0.00073355006,0.00012490121,0.000026841635,0.0004397066,0.010074182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.276002e-7,0.000016761946,0.000012566986,0.00019497894,0.000024890427,0.000006038428,0.0010018334,0.0000022938334,3.4731428e-7,0.66996306,0.09521113,0.23356557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006972239,0.000010129373,0.00044148834,0.0010132475,0.00011401344,0.0000072631046,0.000050778846,0.000005097739,0.000001678678,0.0013900188,0.99670196,0.00019461698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84645116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90268016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9014908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004135801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003892313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614143649","doi":"","title":"Compromised Jurisprudence: Native Title Cases since Mabo","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian aboriginal studies/Australian Aboriginal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Commonwealth; Law; High Court; Publishing; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07565362637497428,"score_gpt":0.44843863272153195,"score_spread":0.37278500634655765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614143649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50462645,0.013457233,0.0000640813,0.07992533,0.00665776,0.003861539,0.0011023072,0.0017720247,0.3885333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7942087,0.0040435796,0.0012342323,0.00019979851,0.0021524474,0.00018345698,0.00002639402,0.000045552013,0.19790585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660915,0.00016148244,0.00060252735,0.0007239521,0.0008488372,0.0010540234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980604,0.0003014657,0.00030112546,0.00037266826,0.0007254059,0.00023894478],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050988066,0.0005061468,0.0006714722,0.00013615743,0.0016871805,0.00017881751,0.0005789819,0.00016926702,0.00045592734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090213136,0.00045955187,0.00020205056,0.0010622707,0.0017174922,0.0003734063,0.000059473514,0.00046062472,0.0015633476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004722073,0.00022331627,0.0056118947,0.00010424713,0.00043331872,0.00023029842,0.002987212,0.000029580462,0.00011660925,0.47987399,0.5096783,0.00066401536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041817757,0.0000881961,0.003928123,0.0001076302,0.00014820603,0.0000121709145,0.009919525,9.424077e-7,0.00037591095,0.003338937,0.9811014,0.0005607819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069144163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003147451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47653505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000748915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039291696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615660506","doi":"","title":"2007. 04. 044. Макиннес М. Канадские критерии неосновательного обогащения. McInnes M. The test of unjust enrichment in Canada // law Quart. Rev. - L. , 2007. - Vol. 123, n 1. - P. 34-39","year":2007,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия 4: государство и право. Реферативный журнал","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.01612773206139259,"score_gpt":0.27534948349857763,"score_spread":0.25922175143718507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615660506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38750428,0.03676761,0.0016254875,0.051739506,0.032580636,0.021999208,0.008247177,0.0019110923,0.457625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533714,0.0044787005,0.0012199993,0.00627056,0.0076748757,0.0008031964,0.00051959656,0.0007897316,0.024871929],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9634141,0.0022187498,0.009871974,0.0056136833,0.0080726305,0.0108088665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97132415,0.008158184,0.005723855,0.00766266,0.0031871428,0.003944016],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015311348,0.0044848905,0.0052523357,0.0014967222,0.005622452,0.001168281,0.010575317,0.002435676,0.009816612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005354243,0.004109212,0.0021854166,0.008513958,0.005310593,0.0029624624,0.0034397114,0.005826354,0.002757644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021569973,0.012562964,0.107783265,0.0028195116,0.0027204466,0.001714814,0.028917747,0.0028254518,0.007859147,0.15774961,0.6458283,0.02706175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063154823,0.0011452095,0.04977527,0.0015246223,0.0013754163,0.00013361435,0.041072935,0.0010855359,0.00570405,0.005851144,0.8801417,0.0058750585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90676826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96811193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5658671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01014056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0132895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617007261","doi":"","title":"Lex Punit Mendacium: punitive damages and Bhasin v Hrynew","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Damages; Duty; Law; Political science; Tort; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.1942475082778507,"score_gpt":0.3992266789309864,"score_spread":0.2049791706531357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617007261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.967512,0.000048793943,0.00016663084,0.0043793814,0.00013327213,0.00032383023,0.0000540064,0.00013277892,0.02724929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96132755,0.00026650762,0.000048889415,0.00021492846,0.00017222326,0.0000019161228,0.000010334358,0.000021923463,0.0379357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825007,0.0002726878,0.00015671612,0.0004767292,0.0003592457,0.0004845824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983401,0.00011908609,0.00024634,0.00069821975,0.00018807685,0.0004081839],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005469898,0.00021863643,0.00023640729,0.00019033503,0.003562866,0.0013721694,0.0012613565,0.00019577099,0.00006951434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014543193,0.00024797922,0.00008306817,0.00018590387,0.00084224535,0.0029221522,0.0006268678,0.00044562534,0.00017672616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027429192,0.00006602643,0.97123754,0.000016082984,0.0000442106,0.000092213464,0.003191372,7.8486113e-7,0.0003059785,0.02228112,0.000003696465,0.0027335295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005851644,0.000036346093,0.8562156,0.000064069965,0.000061031784,0.000004566056,0.0026838325,1.3552005e-7,0.00034559082,0.0009919868,0.13869193,0.00031974164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031811433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021029525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13868824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015622056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018366837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618850900","doi":"","title":"The Explosive Global Growth of Personal Insolvency and the Concomitant Birth of the Study of Comparative Consumer Bankruptcy: Consumer Bankruptcy in Global Perspective, by Johanna Niemi-Kiesilainen, Lain Ramsay & William C. Whitford (eds.); Comparative Consumer Insolvency Regimes: A Canadian Perspective, by Jacob S. Ziegel","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Business; Law and economics; Art; Finance","score_opus":0.022665803827679055,"score_gpt":0.306952309928573,"score_spread":0.2842865061008939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618850900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7633923,0.035338163,0.0000897907,0.012595231,0.0003577317,0.0043958705,0.0029362366,0.000033846092,0.1808608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997357,0.002038663,0.00008711055,0.0002431516,0.00005431969,0.00010008545,0.0000057501184,0.000019623101,0.00009429683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465746,0.0015741669,0.0011887368,0.00058934855,0.0011449488,0.0008453526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530303,0.00073384866,0.0012539038,0.0004587539,0.0018048651,0.00044559946],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015659177,0.00051318714,0.0011042734,0.000079994206,0.0024506329,0.00020604115,0.0012977555,0.00020529696,0.00005190374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032964716,0.00031848092,0.00032027677,0.0011949816,0.0065374873,0.0004677779,0.00019828642,0.0009176499,0.0000038382736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004514024,0.000920435,0.032476,0.000014329,0.0006657788,0.000007692946,0.09416453,0.000034336765,0.000075399585,0.8686622,0.0024780317,0.00004990153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016673187,0.00084220635,0.01997049,0.00042277953,0.00052873377,0.000091074915,0.8261129,0.00012212727,0.00043723427,0.11836383,0.015487065,0.00094834797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68471396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8984803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7502983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016840042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021467414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619024050","doi":"","title":"Positive prescription of landownership in Scots law : the requirement for the written deed, with particular reference to the concepts of ex facie validity and hability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"ERA","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Johannesburg; Dalhousie University; University of Glasgow; University of St Andrews","keywords":"Deed; Prima facie; Law; Medical prescription; Collation; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0993304278905761,"score_gpt":0.3791858712142953,"score_spread":0.2798554433237192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619024050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840185,0.00020350965,0.00010173492,0.0056491843,0.000057069494,0.0023486782,0.000111264155,0.0000061131823,0.007503948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991519,0.00002114865,0.00005201686,0.00007924622,0.000037226142,0.00024207118,0.00004353932,0.0000037104048,0.00036917516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990792,0.0001959159,0.00017398415,0.00014961757,0.0002844506,0.00011679204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990625,0.00028632523,0.00014324668,0.00021408874,0.00026105347,0.000032783475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013147927,0.000072329654,0.00012531831,0.000008599355,0.00023592779,0.000038061567,0.00022974542,0.000058510795,0.0000064209926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015637993,0.00003273231,0.000028498922,0.00011267749,0.00022958397,0.00006145976,0.000020521717,0.00011134723,8.425551e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012083636,0.00031069064,0.012174777,0.0002576337,0.00013629429,4.443113e-7,0.30113092,0.00039543872,0.00235295,0.67363757,0.002002897,0.006392034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015900948,0.0006957609,0.66195506,0.00054231205,0.0004383628,4.4213766e-7,0.15083426,0.00024847442,0.006795317,0.025699768,0.15069786,0.00050227455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011100786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.096240945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6497803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047110807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014704133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99548435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622946236","doi":"","title":"Samuel Richardson and the Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and literature; Philosophy; Legal fiction; Literature; Poetry; History; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.01594819290875621,"score_gpt":0.31665045003188397,"score_spread":0.30070225712312776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622946236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18350312,0.004939641,0.0017410681,0.24370626,0.00033886003,0.00040096228,0.00000333239,0.00004550932,0.56532127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98883677,0.0055436497,0.000017547132,0.00022541813,0.00048216124,0.000004709376,1.1807407e-7,0.000004007308,0.0048856265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988552,0.0000703625,0.00007838266,0.0000721377,0.00015700424,0.000766935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958813,0.000045523157,0.00011287999,0.00016413738,0.000036639285,0.000052716012],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024520117,0.0000426966,0.00006488154,0.0000075298294,0.0045903935,0.00040721172,0.00042105527,0.000030456318,0.000015062547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010304662,0.000026579315,0.000043948097,0.000020930387,0.0005532339,0.00019511957,0.000047563124,0.0006310752,0.000019098783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007164068,0.000004832902,0.0002016806,2.4606425e-7,0.000013330164,1.4155202e-7,0.00081252004,2.1979612e-7,0.000006293124,0.99235004,0.00005525847,0.006548253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004397447,0.000011293198,0.0007631419,0.0000023145883,0.000013183318,0.00001339073,0.002740949,0.000011938371,0.0000038387107,0.7196721,0.27628335,0.000044751818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005630296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03340022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8053336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014420548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057961314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623631935","doi":"","title":"The BCE Blunder: An Argument in Favour of Shareholder Wealth Maximization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Shareholder; Maximization; Financial economics; Economics; Positive economics; Business; Microeconomics; Management; Medicine; Corporate governance; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.020794162243000694,"score_gpt":0.3033554218758259,"score_spread":0.28256125963282525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623631935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6360024,0.0005650654,0.00015779375,0.0032414917,0.00032150839,0.00081536773,0.000047802598,0.000041048475,0.35880747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772805,0.0014772544,0.00048196805,0.000008383691,0.00003552378,0.00000109722,0.00012779729,0.000008576158,0.020578928],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913937,0.00008963828,0.00011221683,0.00018468243,0.0003024393,0.00017166344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991264,0.000048810696,0.00033498066,0.00025988327,0.00015223835,0.0000777174],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034544122,0.00008984201,0.00016545261,0.000028440183,0.0005236381,0.00002224486,0.0005132236,0.00021740682,0.0023604177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023296816,0.000096375625,0.00006744396,0.00008753449,0.00011356787,0.00030782542,0.00003212164,0.000175456,0.0000051604907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021529582,0.0005955524,0.0022975022,0.00022553433,0.000094828116,0.0000029446298,0.51993334,0.00013431755,0.0011516496,0.26325718,0.00094455347,0.21114726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046610172,0.000068555346,0.51726633,0.00008341579,0.00006091656,5.6825776e-8,0.42954704,0.00027792592,0.00006023338,0.00060056464,0.051315445,0.00025339442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5308204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9636609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5149689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024824723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003402968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624364408","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5945","title":"Search for Principle - The Government's Liability in Negligence for the Careless Exercise of its Statutory Powers","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Project commissioning; Liability; Government (linguistics); Law; Publishing; Business; Strict liability; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02710318604166993,"score_gpt":0.3033416156082833,"score_spread":0.2762384295666134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624364408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5700012,0.19232151,0.0096119,0.040872067,0.0019265616,0.05562119,0.0034106364,0.00021866258,0.12601632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8143145,0.18301092,0.00037248735,0.00011339665,0.000075874756,0.00001968796,0.0000064156457,0.000009639677,0.0020771197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902666,0.00010188648,0.0001928802,0.00017244168,0.00031757908,0.00018858117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885,0.0005365606,0.00011419473,0.00029547198,0.00015570855,0.000048055645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013416798,0.00007037699,0.00021219315,0.000006352286,0.0004661517,0.000010158124,0.00063357846,0.000046905574,0.00017704593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039636347,0.00005293249,0.00014893789,0.00026159314,0.00032678363,0.00009896423,0.00004006405,0.00008560099,0.0000042029774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015576938,0.00019254426,0.00055029086,0.002546964,0.000036730362,2.7000627e-7,0.009663614,0.0006208453,0.000082686674,0.9622434,0.00053955906,0.023367334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001511288,0.000021291551,0.0001375005,0.0004124149,0.00005737793,1.8013115e-8,0.0011444878,0.00012417234,0.00021076728,0.00012460459,0.9975553,0.000060912418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037431975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020639799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001393886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001683847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.565862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625723308","doi":"","title":"Defining the Scope of Fiduciary Liability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Liability; Political science; Sociology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.014639407963039953,"score_gpt":0.3302644139803511,"score_spread":0.31562500601731114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625723308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5805724,0.0077950144,0.00094291015,0.03468198,0.0003274817,0.0002929644,0.0000055834325,0.00002801861,0.3753536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949264,0.0032114144,0.00004687703,0.000041551553,0.00022725006,0.0000033024535,2.1058162e-7,0.0000039647916,0.0015390607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986886,0.00009245788,0.0001441106,0.000081718346,0.00020516588,0.0007879541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999273,0.0000792555,0.00023005973,0.0003033408,0.00007302873,0.000041294723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038551895,0.000043997603,0.00007531034,0.000011647508,0.0026901492,0.00012490836,0.0007568559,0.000035359135,0.000037972222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004518964,0.000029756678,0.00007427111,0.00004580363,0.00031376432,0.0001865708,0.000061788596,0.0007146032,0.000021484124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031007378,0.000015519474,0.0031757676,7.72339e-7,0.000012942738,8.239795e-8,0.0005163711,0.0000035112248,0.000026650217,0.975124,0.000066315166,0.021054948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955384,0.000051960476,0.025283003,0.000016259222,0.000024731105,0.000009277105,0.0046569877,0.000011358518,0.00016586066,0.8592033,0.11028381,0.00009795834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029012226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016469955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4143539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002213616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024773267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626293412","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: Missing the Forest for the Trees in Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Causation; Law; Political science; Charter; Section (typography); Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04576770244883175,"score_gpt":0.28317856793729074,"score_spread":0.237410865488459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626293412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54322976,0.001981487,0.04650526,0.33908826,0.0014393234,0.004221908,0.00022117283,0.00013141842,0.06318142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750626,0.000105710635,0.0003915724,0.001237482,0.00041645186,0.00015944924,0.0000073567826,0.0000060337948,0.00016967239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991256,0.00009755283,0.00022032381,0.00016692549,0.0001241031,0.0002655171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.001007032,0.00008457699,0.00025819062,0.00005754472,0.00007354047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005839447,0.000096517484,0.00011780376,0.000019996794,0.002111215,0.00012320622,0.00034356155,0.00003749611,0.000018992789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026726746,0.00006222928,0.000059431197,0.00017337232,0.0004292319,0.00008313859,0.000044902394,0.00010706982,0.0000029472296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031490463,0.000016505512,0.003764999,0.0000075229477,0.000011720176,0.0000069836356,0.0012897275,0.0039162342,0.000010982445,0.9853244,0.0014443872,0.004203434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022249004,0.0000057095313,0.0009773321,0.000030872005,0.000027236463,0.000030949443,0.005655872,0.011581804,0.000018696866,0.0029027667,0.9784274,0.00011887496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8436732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003105366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097313547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626990310","doi":"","title":"21_Vicissitudes of Women's Inheritance Right-England, Canada and India at the Dawn of 21st Century","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Law; Framing (construction); Property (philosophy); Political science; English law; Colonialism; Ecological succession; Devolution (biology); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0068259230433336295,"score_gpt":0.25306679709809177,"score_spread":0.24624087405475814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626990310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898512,0.0016497682,0.000006405022,0.0017828348,0.00006922531,0.00008009089,0.000008693312,0.000002237374,0.0065495516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922964,0.006722138,0.000007392265,0.000030217347,0.00012099948,0.0000037533312,4.2183208e-7,0.000004265419,0.0008144058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986471,0.000056175184,0.00015854638,0.00008243806,0.00025328784,0.000802439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929595,0.000056267643,0.0003142072,0.00018812437,0.000064722546,0.00008072555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011781954,0.000058196543,0.00011801596,0.000012318184,0.0014383093,0.00005453509,0.00044551792,0.000033050786,0.000043463227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008505997,0.000039145743,0.000027239394,0.000046641064,0.00029315596,0.00010914704,0.00006800293,0.00039487446,6.252392e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003405187,0.00004024394,0.059355434,0.000010602402,0.00011204484,0.000001502451,0.008311075,0.0000029731095,0.0008300059,0.91708785,0.00008833707,0.014125868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012501962,0.00015558684,0.183881,0.00004585679,0.000046460482,0.000042887128,0.039177638,0.0000041004064,0.0007397581,0.096024975,0.67834413,0.00028739212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28146464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9581873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82106286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009805458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032053308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2684633609","doi":"10.7202/1040056ar","title":"The Boundaries of Corporate Law and Trust Law: An Analysis of Locking v. McCowan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Corporate law; Duty of loyalty; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); CLARITY; Constructive trust; Business; Economics; Political science; Corporate governance; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.06008812866721274,"score_gpt":0.3362650276703774,"score_spread":0.27617689900316467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2684633609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37676513,0.00013875884,0.00007739443,0.002739423,0.00017310235,0.00011514008,0.000121476536,0.000012842367,0.6198567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995186,0.00007305769,0.00015523701,0.00007750125,0.00007533567,0.0000012957356,0.0000010598218,0.0000042398665,0.00009367627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916744,0.00008743698,0.00024310983,0.00009050468,0.00025396686,0.00015751785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987056,0.000055606106,0.00067438534,0.0002717672,0.00018848594,0.0001041071],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009922968,0.000057339254,0.00017473577,0.000021162743,0.021506874,0.00053757,0.00040944296,0.000040356852,0.000027217735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000433278,0.000039803963,0.00008704168,0.0000928184,0.002642933,0.0003786466,0.00006585323,0.0001233301,6.803644e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007451718,0.000017236292,0.0026279883,0.0000016481711,0.00010093479,9.899225e-7,0.0005667107,0.000020453039,0.000063714106,0.9957484,0.000004641479,0.0008398354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001747511,0.00003907468,0.010444869,0.000012683318,0.00029041327,0.0000029315477,0.0020193919,0.00024438716,0.0006097537,0.034798425,0.9512704,0.00009294121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05040689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4693512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96094996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024820427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024528941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97976696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26938422","doi":"10.7748/ns.30.19.61.s45","title":"Unjust Enrichment by Transfer: Some Comparative Remarks","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Law; Pretext; Common law; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); German; Civil law (Civil law); Adversarial system; Political science; Sociology; Commercial law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.05560637465699839,"score_gpt":0.36798483189039044,"score_spread":0.312378457233392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26938422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016143394,0.16558787,0.00035279666,0.023644315,0.00008438754,0.0013585808,0.000030402514,0.00012911053,0.8071982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65197045,0.3213654,0.00015718964,0.013423987,0.0002791515,0.00014245903,0.00004597306,0.000013851247,0.012601544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989157,0.00014997952,0.0002440793,0.0001985233,0.0002504063,0.00024135556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995062,0.000059575177,0.000037953883,0.0002146663,0.000046884805,0.0001347186],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004832777,0.00010091489,0.00026232222,0.0000074365466,0.00035516563,0.000041651667,0.00026995063,0.000041111736,0.0012510574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010132937,0.00008434726,0.00009238431,0.000253534,0.00018205629,0.00021298692,0.000017949144,0.0001125253,0.0007177601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010546053,0.00006217546,0.00002722536,0.000082510014,0.0000093057215,8.7950735e-7,0.00026194705,2.483062e-7,0.000017012544,0.960019,0.036944546,0.0025741176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007863876,0.0000130984545,0.00004401889,0.00025163573,0.000036103007,7.138012e-7,0.00004284143,0.0000013836326,0.000024053998,0.0015522364,0.99784064,0.000114650946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002054489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096959004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9608961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007712639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052637326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733216121","doi":"","title":"Shifting Blame? Reassessing the Tort of Inducing Breach of Contract Following A.I. Enterprises v. Bram","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Blame; Breach of contract; Supreme court; Law; Law and economics; Liability; Delict; Political science; Business; Damages; Economics; Private law; Comparative law; Black letter law; Psychology","score_opus":0.014101229843573515,"score_gpt":0.3095988311398896,"score_spread":0.2954976012963161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733216121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822145,0.00080298365,0.007140235,0.003087484,0.000107726526,0.0001168769,0.000001766314,0.00001546978,0.006512921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987083,0.00057369727,0.00007663997,0.00002890631,0.0002650525,0.0000028065908,1.9421559e-7,0.000009770804,0.0003346063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981117,0.00015887276,0.00035325377,0.00011292093,0.00034828324,0.0009149324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897736,0.0003551465,0.00038365452,0.0001426065,0.000088968525,0.000052261053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034032266,0.00007617979,0.00016184944,0.00004159117,0.0005497247,0.000051679453,0.00038764998,0.000055187804,0.000019373661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003712866,0.00004452342,0.00016887284,0.00017393046,0.00013293362,0.00031056657,0.000038141407,0.0004881645,0.0000019042302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025943717,0.00012155139,0.07820078,0.000006755483,0.00027584092,0.000001533948,0.007884429,0.0000075938524,0.040729567,0.6517693,0.000024171113,0.22095257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053478424,0.0007672645,0.14174487,0.002751984,0.0008465026,0.00024904308,0.12929283,0.00011171487,0.021365369,0.6501075,0.045891188,0.0015239068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001959112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026272193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21942866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037191747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020312574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4228093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734331544","doi":"","title":"Constructive Trusts in Canada: Part 1","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trust Law International","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constructive trust; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.022251991621960315,"score_gpt":0.2915776204173321,"score_spread":0.2693256287953718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734331544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25350478,0.000009087163,0.00002539159,0.005833398,0.0005890069,0.00008816335,0.00003196463,0.000015790412,0.73990244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955816,0.00002739564,0.00009903767,0.0006201804,0.00035398686,0.000022077536,0.000010042547,0.000003380768,0.0032822834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930334,0.000025451047,0.0001310211,0.000118701864,0.00026963133,0.00015187603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999727,0.00004683688,0.00003874664,0.0000654611,0.00006109429,0.00006086057],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010860139,0.00004552937,0.000057435598,0.000018783865,0.0001316046,0.00003202875,0.00022233691,0.000024894987,0.0021205575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003208108,0.000047782996,0.00001854558,0.000107869615,0.000118364806,0.00012601579,0.000025632464,0.00008191978,0.000041733474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004989821,0.000013552667,0.04475569,2.3962698e-7,0.00000614027,0.00000784036,0.00031164172,0.000028840814,0.0000026632226,0.9522024,0.0013559656,0.0013100638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017636159,0.0000015700068,0.021156382,0.0000046743176,0.000001425358,0.0000025824536,0.0011012063,0.00014854736,0.000013816731,0.0058034696,0.97152495,0.00006504117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9675856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99570626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97016895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006814942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006973198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735793308","doi":"","title":"Weaving a Third Strand into the Braid of Aboriginal–Crown Relations: Legal Obligations to Finance Aboriginal Governments Negotiated in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Braid; Weaving; Political science; Negotiation; Law; History; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010713763013351902,"score_gpt":0.3185370621901113,"score_spread":0.3078232991767594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735793308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88556194,0.000031753065,0.00041030734,0.021338582,0.00013593098,0.00039175738,0.000030113282,0.0000128637685,0.09208673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99337685,0.00006936926,0.0007411699,0.00021393177,0.00005898624,0.000046957688,0.0000022103877,0.0000050121757,0.005485508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988423,0.00004555879,0.0002599797,0.00018491915,0.00043823276,0.00022899108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991499,0.00011379118,0.00017371943,0.0003932336,0.00009260739,0.00007672402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003429856,0.00008240295,0.0001169916,0.000024504812,0.0013703493,0.0001716394,0.00063623086,0.000036828544,0.00010350185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012707565,0.00006618822,0.000029926578,0.00028201408,0.00015064338,0.0004502235,0.000033264427,0.00014908373,0.000016749173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016080654,0.000051437586,0.1449628,0.000005332467,0.000014846656,0.0000027450562,0.009024128,0.00085676915,0.00033850627,0.8393019,0.0039023617,0.0015230803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023673056,0.000010738036,0.42335945,0.000041423256,0.0000096294225,2.2544323e-7,0.0033615704,0.00029557836,0.00025537753,0.001713995,0.5705901,0.00012517978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8375879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005779194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030284429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736618327","doi":"","title":"La Cour supérieure de l’Ontario se prononce sur l’obligation d’une partie contractante à verser des royautés","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.0395724038901633,"score_gpt":0.30355587079468044,"score_spread":0.26398346690451713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736618327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8413102,0.0018020847,0.011957488,0.010862902,0.0005193064,0.00094940886,0.00003985109,0.00010545388,0.1324533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8440394,0.0008801111,0.0014135139,0.00030603007,0.00033020365,0.00013346912,0.00001135838,0.00005258111,0.15283333],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679595,0.0005331193,0.0005055811,0.00060505694,0.00043199898,0.0011282769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973234,0.0006520493,0.000469724,0.0007535293,0.0003349433,0.00046633522],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016926097,0.00039641044,0.00041787222,0.00006534528,0.0043131765,0.00084350444,0.0010377457,0.00086285744,0.0015495255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016076913,0.00041244866,0.00026420128,0.00029393984,0.0044095805,0.00083447027,0.0001705598,0.001573829,0.00030893876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065368996,0.0012497203,0.06511264,0.0005129826,0.0005478633,0.0001735002,0.516579,0.0012988901,0.004574931,0.23771605,0.017648928,0.15393181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009367177,0.00015139433,0.010780873,0.00029350148,0.00019739478,0.00004198915,0.008140675,0.0062812446,0.0052321074,0.020516012,0.9467759,0.0006521778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20408805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25923765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022083053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00181794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737151909","doi":"10.7202/1058598ar","title":"L’impact de la transaction sur l’évaluation des dommages subis par la caution, le codébiteur solidaire ou d’autres personnes intéressées","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018327053076613226,"score_gpt":0.28871307597197604,"score_spread":0.27038602289536284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737151909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95736337,0.0018895459,0.0034722227,0.006263027,0.00021637959,0.0004879003,0.000112339345,0.00016397647,0.030031262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832464,0.0033046224,0.0006848728,0.00006424408,0.0005665678,0.00007707513,0.00004117296,0.00004393342,0.011971149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973451,0.00092379306,0.000355339,0.00042500044,0.0002941062,0.0006566657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984717,0.00059142517,0.00020397689,0.00031938107,0.00017060427,0.00024295799],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016878576,0.00021841544,0.00033145226,0.00010076885,0.000774801,0.0003314277,0.00032695738,0.00041560095,0.00046147977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018998697,0.00029634943,0.00032355599,0.00054711074,0.0007377028,0.000772971,0.000027515267,0.00039817882,0.0002579853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019828718,0.0019711002,0.29024193,0.0017253531,0.00049988163,0.00006668082,0.18144114,0.029712783,0.023342881,0.29583248,0.0068041235,0.16816333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002058016,0.00030907363,0.71879613,0.0010502845,0.00050863106,0.00022895439,0.014737858,0.041192394,0.0039756238,0.10068086,0.115080215,0.0013819503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0168153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003667654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4285542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060434244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005966527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738746496","doi":"","title":"Resulting Trusts in Canada: Part 1","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trust Law International","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04613864828702695,"score_gpt":0.2851674116505589,"score_spread":0.23902876336353196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738746496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1269695,0.00002260893,0.000008185382,0.012166584,0.00040708686,0.000080740116,0.000029361778,0.000022083592,0.86029387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916419,0.000023832992,0.00011130305,0.0006611572,0.00033741756,0.000017311786,0.000006216187,0.0000037874331,0.0071971016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999254,0.00002563354,0.00015387237,0.00011750494,0.00029129692,0.0001576778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973434,0.000054336637,0.000041895302,0.00007270121,0.000041813593,0.00005493397],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012380241,0.000041888783,0.000049648825,0.000017241326,0.00015725818,0.000039782564,0.0002430411,0.00002335608,0.0027496442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006774186,0.000044180568,0.000017836253,0.00009739457,0.00005233704,0.000115694245,0.000027195632,0.00008842547,0.00008109779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001912981,0.00002437871,0.014224713,6.331195e-7,0.00000494769,0.000005435622,0.0008007316,0.00007765119,0.0000063574716,0.974001,0.008178364,0.0026738655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016212118,0.0000012605655,0.0049820445,0.0000068921004,0.0000010195027,4.8201974e-7,0.0007222594,0.0018205885,0.000018547738,0.00085157144,0.99136996,0.00006324917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9617011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005446575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015046506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739427840","doi":"10.29173/alr781","title":"The Tortious Liability of Directors and Officers to Third Parties in Common Law Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Alberta; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Tort; Law; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Strict liability; Supreme court; Limited liability partnership; Common law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.0224902468524259,"score_gpt":0.326771590468478,"score_spread":0.3042813436160521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739427840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42388815,0.014176051,1.9007352e-7,0.07025224,0.0001638836,0.0010924559,0.000010825893,0.000008356436,0.49040785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992095,0.006045323,0.0000049701625,0.0011859144,0.000017682716,0.000042241398,5.7536494e-7,0.000002585897,0.0006057424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993269,0.000092911745,0.0002045458,0.00010868049,0.00012970026,0.00013726833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902207,0.00036309802,0.00010725295,0.00040118067,0.000032660362,0.00007373536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005275811,0.0000510067,0.00017510878,0.000001793166,0.0007868805,0.000055021977,0.0003126153,0.000018290517,0.000011466545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026035754,0.00003478033,0.000025979993,0.000047464462,0.00033284925,0.00007377134,0.00007269654,0.00005120372,0.0000028768277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013964632,0.000009602241,0.00908064,0.000108998334,0.0000044811645,1.4490561e-7,0.00045470367,5.4016994e-7,0.0000013838683,0.9852081,0.0015432276,0.0035867656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021538768,0.0000045184315,0.00871545,0.00018759609,0.0000095697205,5.523653e-8,0.000053891992,7.4967693e-7,0.0000142789495,0.00054111856,0.99040437,0.000046847603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99978334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98886114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056989506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001543503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6052128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740095659","doi":"","title":"Filling the gaps: recognition of environmental protection as a charitable purpose","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Legislation; Law; Environmental law; State (computer science); Action (physics); Political science; Relation (database); Private law; Business; Public law; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.016397104349343307,"score_gpt":0.19764272274169553,"score_spread":0.18124561839235223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740095659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88031834,0.000020925383,0.0008977189,0.00024730407,0.00006122695,0.0002733803,0.000035461264,0.000025593563,0.11812003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953167,0.000020811822,0.0000919302,0.000009297656,0.00006181232,0.0000010793099,0.00000883071,0.000003860004,0.0044857063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940336,0.000047576385,0.000089849666,0.00013301036,0.00022042503,0.00010575497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995717,0.00004599556,0.0001590162,0.0001407322,0.000035009012,0.000047591468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001403399,0.000050922157,0.00008075345,0.000027770719,0.0005993168,0.00004868736,0.00020163508,0.000050060986,0.000049320362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003296881,0.00005356623,0.00007656563,0.0001074805,0.00026228672,0.00051514094,0.000058513142,0.0000726765,0.000046546396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000666739,0.0028192834,0.02656162,0.0003442677,0.00047125018,0.000035186098,0.08967406,0.00052024936,0.23279347,0.09116716,0.002413202,0.5525335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014831624,0.00072386285,0.036304727,0.00024750133,0.00019124831,0.000031274187,0.082426,0.0020437553,0.016949585,0.01597779,0.8428159,0.00080525054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011552274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008774315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84040266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057138575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003092445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46095204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751540023","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1263","title":"The Properties of Planning: An Evolving Landscape","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Scholarship; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Property rights; Law; Political science; Function (biology); Object (grammar); Property law; Sociology; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Business; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.053760351179483606,"score_gpt":0.36115950563449417,"score_spread":0.30739915445501054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751540023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87444633,0.00068854715,0.000011310754,0.03404954,0.000046338,0.000063711086,0.0000016808709,0.000007889893,0.09068464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781847,0.00007715839,0.000026991676,0.00048166516,0.001416924,3.1291955e-7,7.622822e-8,0.0000018878217,0.00017651504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999462,0.000061093844,0.00016962472,0.000030509353,0.00016460528,0.000112151625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996072,0.000021879034,0.00016303838,0.000033191915,0.00012305769,0.000051656934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045209852,0.00003325661,0.00008914362,0.00001977356,0.0009132994,0.00009885151,0.00013776465,0.00003629022,0.0000022391514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005375245,0.000020377844,0.0000435091,0.00006457485,0.00019273511,0.00019708367,0.000009044204,0.000086974476,2.698594e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127102485,0.000026818883,0.00014672895,0.0000022057577,0.000007699222,4.300133e-7,0.04140591,0.0000016758611,0.00069618295,0.95435363,0.00039126535,0.0029547631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008152507,0.00045831388,0.035644826,0.00008004389,0.000058102334,0.000011969374,0.049931157,0.0000622974,0.0006337357,0.10882275,0.8032284,0.00025318802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001203292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001895832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84553087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001651546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001660697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70244527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751766599","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0098","title":"Parenthood is a fiduciary relationship","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Law; Possession (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Discretion; Sociology; Epistemology; Duty; Philosophy; Geography; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0440035289107704,"score_gpt":0.2702720190051765,"score_spread":0.2262684900944061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751766599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026929138,0.000495109,0.0026511175,0.03987712,0.00009445217,0.00011767703,0.0000287409,0.000040447318,0.9297662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750996,0.00015143878,0.0011967816,0.00031513738,0.00015148171,1.9919336e-8,8.0991407e-7,0.0000018769814,0.00067247555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954957,0.000059271642,0.00006561951,0.000066814,0.00016535743,0.00009334341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995884,0.000034411438,0.0000821764,0.000052666197,0.000071942835,0.00017042302],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013294967,0.00003138979,0.00006106746,0.000003714411,0.0010142094,0.000022546124,0.00022323692,0.00003747465,0.0022943635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028549619,0.000036466,0.00006864557,0.000032551994,0.00010728096,0.0003539581,0.00003426447,0.00009577893,0.00002864036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025244693,0.000050218096,0.008063738,0.0000052013847,0.00003023632,0.000008769085,0.08332038,0.000014161964,0.0000381613,0.88318235,0.023272488,0.0019890417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020456286,0.000023088567,0.007005219,0.000007221875,0.000022162376,0.0000010490347,0.023953924,0.00003154072,0.00000917453,0.0014212144,0.96726274,0.000058070556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03759274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04619371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107168045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008685077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751928772","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340016","title":"Private Prosecutions in Mauritius: Clarifying Locus Standi and Making the Director of Public Prosecutions more Accountable","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Supreme court; Legislation; Political science; Constitution; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.11390202566414076,"score_gpt":0.40719505907110903,"score_spread":0.2932930334069683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751928772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337164,0.007587515,0.00023337847,0.044490706,0.00019293693,0.0004938287,0.000039718445,0.000015356098,0.013230151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980511,0.0011908421,0.0003497101,0.00003844278,0.00016453929,0.000023960034,1.7957021e-7,0.000006413784,0.00017479526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987449,0.000110604014,0.00039292415,0.00011598493,0.00035592914,0.00027963798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858284,0.00016367361,0.0006211925,0.00020455346,0.00036465924,0.00006310152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014117359,0.0000937452,0.00026446208,0.000084646235,0.0022558994,0.00034504462,0.00048178172,0.00004040336,0.0000058500095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092632824,0.00006319124,0.00006923664,0.00023122245,0.0011832758,0.0007778667,0.00020073203,0.00030445485,5.020516e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003954289,0.00025464816,0.17839506,0.000077226025,0.00035384583,0.000027211223,0.07546432,0.000027963248,0.0005668476,0.7389888,0.0013145229,0.004490014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012091228,0.0001939519,0.22316232,0.00061234605,0.0001889483,0.000039728613,0.2067249,0.000041298805,0.00022253649,0.018936982,0.54824513,0.00042273838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008649508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00304678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7200518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015637962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002263473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756635865","doi":"10.29173/alr794","title":"An Action on the Equities: Re-Characterizing Bhasin as Equitable Estoppel","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Supreme court; Duty; Doctrine; Law; Meaning (existential); Political science; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14661944682417943,"score_gpt":0.432664828031975,"score_spread":0.28604538120779555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756635865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019594267,0.0016571477,0.000007064645,0.08921091,0.00021088056,0.00071631226,0.0000054935103,0.000036205336,0.8885617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95856905,0.015089187,0.000023419065,0.013212944,0.00035795677,0.00013096893,0.0000099678255,0.000014178025,0.0125923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989438,0.00015042395,0.00017746605,0.00020994045,0.00022221864,0.00029614955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984855,0.0002579598,0.00021371518,0.0009001037,0.000044573153,0.00009817056],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009311472,0.00009694296,0.0001648196,0.0000061588994,0.0032779959,0.00045387176,0.00075383316,0.00004123897,0.0011441244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037526124,0.00006690853,0.000078306024,0.000047064004,0.00021410373,0.00059050036,0.00008535259,0.00013581142,0.0011208754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013516709,0.000024379424,0.000020671449,0.00006409058,0.0000053812246,3.2642782e-7,0.00045454837,1.1878549e-7,0.00011558352,0.99129194,0.0020550166,0.0059665744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031227475,0.00002083952,0.00014104729,0.00057972595,0.000025843907,5.916803e-7,0.00019633645,0.0000043202517,0.00009664516,0.0017469686,0.9970588,0.00009761928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076593794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037402388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005736211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078145706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756978318","doi":"10.29173/alr790","title":"A Rational Approach to Cabinet Immunity Under the Common Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Impartiality; Public interest; Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Cabinet (room); Common law; Doctrine; Law and economics; Discretion; Sociology","score_opus":0.07445598635515686,"score_gpt":0.37197572510287996,"score_spread":0.2975197387477231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756978318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008357755,0.0023123338,0.000049916933,0.080173895,0.00004911916,0.0007109163,0.000005212388,0.000011217759,0.9158516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97002727,0.0021931073,0.00016218651,0.021482555,0.00016108372,0.0002206515,0.000020205005,0.000007813008,0.005725136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919397,0.0001667522,0.000156844,0.0001336997,0.00018808519,0.00016065947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881065,0.00018963777,0.000096107295,0.0007658047,0.000051577164,0.000086213884],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006510512,0.00007258541,0.00014985602,0.0000027683045,0.003001596,0.00021995859,0.00086062273,0.000032340766,0.00013510128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007872701,0.0000474212,0.000072961644,0.00006705735,0.0003388685,0.00016573415,0.00014917899,0.00011870331,0.000291024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4569407e-7,0.00003074465,0.000027023194,0.000032121497,0.000007001792,3.0611595e-8,0.00026728908,0.0000021617268,0.0000015700537,0.9952767,0.0038540973,0.0005008475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003750479,0.0000034953139,0.00071263907,0.00009720053,0.000023413104,6.214359e-7,0.00005691006,0.0000066589155,0.0000020615469,0.0057013887,0.9932848,0.00007329183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23183078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21007435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98957527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030986244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005651336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757350045","doi":"10.29173/alr789","title":"Hryniak v. Mauldin Comes to Alberta: Summary Judgment, Culture Shift, and the Future of Civil Trials","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Civil procedure; Test (biology); Political science","score_opus":0.046066588270874745,"score_gpt":0.37091813333592605,"score_spread":0.3248515450650513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757350045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078953465,0.11845227,0.000006635768,0.3326751,0.00030875904,0.0026783817,0.00003178528,0.000012734506,0.5450448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56187564,0.3682067,0.00017886366,0.019876046,0.0013671105,0.0005161452,0.000024292685,0.000031897496,0.04792332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983703,0.0004431519,0.00046991184,0.00024775133,0.00024498854,0.00022389869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976946,0.0009054042,0.00043829286,0.00075238245,0.00006220515,0.0001471039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021154876,0.00014790444,0.00070930144,0.000008941888,0.0011715724,0.00017585265,0.00080380583,0.00008629658,0.00027668697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010742092,0.000082511666,0.000222825,0.000110036344,0.0005024582,0.0002058456,0.00020844917,0.00013112361,0.000058033016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012327725,0.000019310843,0.00017508928,0.00021415885,0.00003914237,1.8664024e-7,0.0016065856,8.776744e-8,0.0000028851323,0.94945014,0.04416049,0.0043196236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034429977,0.000012701755,0.000289683,0.00069038925,0.00015348113,5.41516e-7,0.00010202525,5.189941e-7,0.0000065687814,0.0038034872,0.994482,0.00011430392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074345015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45132384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9503215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018950926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005839697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.931819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758059862","doi":"10.1017/9781108303972.012","title":"Prince Albert v Strange and Jasper Thomsett Judge and Her Majesty’s Attorney General","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.026361094684220748,"score_gpt":0.32363043773208566,"score_spread":0.2972693430478649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758059862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000987983,0.00085951405,0.00003675894,0.0025250579,0.000122040816,0.00036782149,0.000050739487,0.00009119016,0.9949589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003829483,0.0016687723,0.0012775916,0.0002880988,0.00073441287,0.000027895932,0.000007948896,0.000086201864,0.9920796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908537,0.000037048358,0.00008885141,0.00035916964,0.0001805993,0.00024899284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993511,0.000022940201,0.00009813594,0.0003342323,0.000017363298,0.00017622861],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001566469,0.00016537821,0.00019090027,0.000035510537,0.00038541362,0.00022842581,0.00026131794,0.0002579785,0.0020180617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017757013,0.0001369918,0.00003593951,0.000029318455,0.0004229675,0.00008568712,0.00011142365,0.00013153287,0.00009154597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020181562,0.00003057364,0.0057436153,0.00003590424,0.00004286461,0.0000034300842,0.00094778097,4.5131664e-8,0.000019589921,0.23571755,0.7485172,0.0089394115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011778953,0.000005325982,0.0043565566,0.000027520604,0.000018787952,9.417538e-7,0.000056570778,0.000003914046,0.0000016381714,0.00023191265,0.99497616,0.0002028971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036377948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09314598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24645893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017677381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007711962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758204849","doi":"","title":"Guardians of Legal Order: The Dual Commissions of Public Fiduciaries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Order (exchange); Beneficiary; Law; Loyalty; Law and economics; Discretion; Private law; Business; Political science; Economics; Public law; Finance","score_opus":0.03180910994011936,"score_gpt":0.3304465240453309,"score_spread":0.29863741410521155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758204849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59806883,0.0022371602,0.004405111,0.203229,0.00042133653,0.0004116756,0.0000335812,0.000034904402,0.19115837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447006,0.0013651418,0.00004684062,0.000028046086,0.00026431904,0.0000036633646,7.597901e-7,0.000005955692,0.0038152079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983591,0.00013551023,0.00022458174,0.00007914076,0.00031496646,0.00088674587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988806,0.00009031402,0.0003765854,0.00034355515,0.00023652262,0.00007237644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026100504,0.00006210659,0.00013043359,0.000031586882,0.0028780124,0.0001833466,0.000809657,0.00005176596,0.000060701674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000658055,0.00004192314,0.000106003274,0.00011164814,0.00066446,0.00030335248,0.00008307363,0.0007432382,0.0000052724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032335477,0.00004106806,0.0025974126,0.0000011673668,0.000046603705,2.1643105e-7,0.0010365034,0.0000041807543,0.00008869438,0.98790133,0.0003445196,0.007935066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038705996,0.00010659096,0.010497704,0.00001670461,0.00005458111,0.000029617913,0.021550553,0.00001752677,0.00013949344,0.30198985,0.6650735,0.0001368188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059385234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049918886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6859115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013815943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048054303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760341954","doi":"","title":"Understanding Private Law's Remedies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Private law; Law and economics; Business; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.018481233417820656,"score_gpt":0.1990035888964465,"score_spread":0.18052235547862586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760341954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016712677,0.00019062597,0.000021747277,0.004246657,0.0003093344,0.0002548276,0.00009125211,0.000014274748,0.9781586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89416677,0.00055488304,0.0002477556,0.000552372,0.00013200159,0.000020299496,0.00004663969,0.000019840623,0.10425942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977423,0.00004855002,0.00023101893,0.00020693365,0.0014978681,0.0002733385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992533,0.00017794067,0.00020433567,0.00014147548,6.2189673e-7,0.00022237176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000122937845,0.00015320253,0.00020409183,0.000014679477,0.00068001647,0.00006241529,0.00026169574,0.000055010016,0.00010205432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004100126,0.00015278065,0.000027985167,0.00006739598,0.00012407573,0.0003113834,0.000048816528,0.00016431115,6.226709e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028771048,0.000006089847,0.00038872156,0.00008842358,0.00003216208,0.0000041559542,0.00062164804,0.0000023432444,0.0011527402,0.9956855,0.0015004025,0.00048901374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002130917,0.000026192587,0.006869931,0.0003195883,0.000053776792,4.387287e-7,0.0776445,0.000105423955,0.016499849,0.06203402,0.83568716,0.00054603844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05403615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6695703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022535569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019725633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9522631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760860897","doi":"10.1017/9781316145364.005","title":"Rule-Following and Charity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.043362750025180946,"score_gpt":0.2616897700324361,"score_spread":0.21832702000725515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760860897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003907304,0.00010910756,0.000050954604,0.0001486552,0.00015284574,0.00029322304,0.00012516184,0.00009006014,0.9986393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010286645,0.00023970228,0.00005980232,0.000037581452,0.00020615543,6.131995e-7,0.000011111607,0.000015593352,0.9891428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991155,0.000024441695,0.000084340536,0.00033836928,0.00022235546,0.00021495887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991318,0.000043367923,0.00015549884,0.0004109727,0.000060653187,0.00019771463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001760219,0.00016451655,0.00021981412,0.00004963876,0.0016703221,0.00015138838,0.0005261943,0.00028668132,0.000005165661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018378038,0.00020262465,0.00014749344,0.0000020415694,0.00047775783,0.00012962811,0.00033996426,0.0003026132,0.000015457892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043007058,0.0000026066634,0.00000916586,0.000011578116,0.000038708527,0.00004377323,0.0002595703,2.8669012e-8,0.000006403809,0.9941695,0.003597139,0.0018572658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001557444,0.000004982671,0.00007668171,0.000055349607,0.00010381896,7.197935e-7,0.00008005604,0.0000030581607,0.000008552672,0.00016936779,0.9991132,0.00022843778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035372283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010421638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99551606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119892255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016341197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763015737","doi":"","title":"The civil law and the common law in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Political science; Tort; Public law; Liability","score_opus":0.01235951439075232,"score_gpt":0.23719560531633285,"score_spread":0.22483609092558055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763015737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016783481,0.00016917713,0.0000025874604,0.0057253195,0.00007880836,0.00021053068,0.000015054755,0.000013585094,0.9770014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921385,0.0006437527,0.00001090234,0.0014019145,0.00011426154,0.0000096477415,5.2112176e-7,0.00001098778,0.0056695254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879444,0.00040879188,0.00023065435,0.00013128504,0.00021666665,0.00021816537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888945,0.00065157394,0.00008821994,0.00027298427,0.000026832782,0.00007092935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008732287,0.00007493797,0.00011203073,0.0000047067992,0.0006411549,0.000041652118,0.00042141273,0.00001426224,0.000015272482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031256808,0.000036046116,0.00002802418,0.000044418066,0.0012093306,0.00007927955,0.00012789048,0.00008723239,0.000011377361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007260384,0.0000047505337,0.00047016915,0.0000015799594,0.000003534338,0.0000025672382,0.00080798025,3.5813272e-7,0.0000049610203,0.9960443,0.0006849948,0.0019675686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000324623,0.0000046996606,0.0021380964,0.000016125807,0.000005534381,4.1866497e-7,0.00027891994,9.296383e-7,0.000008212853,0.015732083,0.98142517,0.000065176166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9557507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99839497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071348215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015018752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49313098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763391450","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.024","title":"Up there in theBegriffshimmel?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.037839719998191176,"score_gpt":0.24046959381705613,"score_spread":0.20262987381886494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763391450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038158902,0.000105414176,0.000030240546,0.00017919282,0.00015353516,0.00057218934,0.00009409369,0.00009281723,0.9983909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014939543,0.00026282342,0.000026475182,0.00007119344,0.00017432927,0.0000023996463,0.000014610593,0.000024639765,0.98448396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892133,0.000053464137,0.00013823171,0.00034546817,0.00025072345,0.00029078827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916536,0.00007304233,0.00013537308,0.00037414802,0.0000989674,0.00015309459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014119009,0.00019980258,0.00023591738,0.000096510696,0.00034670826,0.0000748682,0.0006551041,0.0003807892,0.00008380565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008831321,0.00022064094,0.00013581944,0.000012035194,0.00035787758,0.000108400054,0.00021489659,0.00045184488,0.00018516283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066173807,0.000005559193,0.00000454982,0.00000993979,0.000018791114,0.000020359656,0.00048327912,5.289061e-7,0.000004816245,0.9766418,0.02091217,0.0018916246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020301479,0.0000070277583,0.000056222158,0.00005796495,0.000030100842,4.0910044e-7,0.00046852336,0.0000069801235,0.000010924423,0.00015315627,0.99875003,0.00025562372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009351069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004353246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97783786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000275799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021438132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765178681","doi":"10.1177/1473779517725010","title":"Punitive damages for breach of contract","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.10015441868510054,"score_gpt":0.4525898886485318,"score_spread":0.3524354699634312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765178681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060083286,0.034187127,0.000070820395,0.03878247,0.000105481806,0.0014129592,0.0000801538,0.00003196102,0.9247282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754741,0.018607503,0.00022426304,0.0011347078,0.00011240878,0.0001121259,0.000009184304,0.0000063821426,0.004319313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942267,0.00006928971,0.0001824619,0.00009687713,0.00009985243,0.00012883157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989538,0.00020938605,0.00024158513,0.00042562277,0.00011131853,0.000058282625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063439197,0.000056089786,0.00024218857,0.000008621269,0.00090559066,0.000070556096,0.00050177827,0.000019381838,0.00012822995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012409601,0.000046601617,0.000106921965,0.000053745272,0.00036863537,0.00016260665,0.000057276407,0.00006575415,0.000015638827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011395618,0.000026519285,0.00026950153,0.00022496266,0.0000072108633,1.8834804e-7,0.00007627369,2.8218581e-8,0.0000075951434,0.9649723,0.003438367,0.0309759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088157154,0.0000059604185,0.0018967992,0.0008454048,0.00003962508,1.0971904e-7,0.000018327073,0.0000018101281,0.000055267243,0.005369468,0.9916196,0.000059510694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029241478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021488518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9881812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015518803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040088067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99636674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765213390","doi":"","title":"The Charter and Administrative Law Part II: Substantive Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Jurisdiction; High Court; Administrative law; Agency (philosophy); Legislation; Sociology","score_opus":0.04338169592629922,"score_gpt":0.3700630900889842,"score_spread":0.326681394162685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765213390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082915395,0.11266062,0.00018847818,0.35176134,0.000493427,0.0011203412,0.000017772885,0.00005150304,0.45079112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80201435,0.19127053,0.0000045464058,0.00032415506,0.0003005682,0.000011484154,3.6158931e-7,0.0000039021984,0.0060700946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986313,0.00008695477,0.00013430559,0.00010297116,0.0001764232,0.000868033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940306,0.000052402393,0.00019894214,0.00018850784,0.000079997575,0.0000770717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021132843,0.00006342817,0.000090278874,0.0000045164834,0.008538067,0.00029578872,0.00038903597,0.000028675837,0.000023276625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010777079,0.000040567622,0.000050421844,0.000029245019,0.0004844171,0.00024014214,0.00004455647,0.00062684354,0.000015312418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030255542,0.000008020189,0.0000783789,0.0000019031241,0.00002158106,4.1419628e-7,0.00051843945,4.5663224e-9,0.0000032778057,0.9905776,0.00040808212,0.008379269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090866466,0.000057650475,0.00029882367,0.00006129732,0.000020516876,0.000014651536,0.0021126715,6.1239973e-7,0.000008529245,0.18802127,0.80925053,0.00006259469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029782057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031295136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8088424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013882764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010077328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766092601","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017r-0028","title":"Thinking like a private lawyer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Relation (database); Tort; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Centrality; Context (archaeology); Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy; Liability; History","score_opus":0.021583469122099904,"score_gpt":0.27689184325087796,"score_spread":0.25530837412877805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766092601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039311863,0.00010907461,0.00079284987,0.003479361,0.00019419807,0.000062574225,0.0000040213017,0.00001772734,0.95602834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935752,0.00027817528,0.0024367638,0.00005957237,0.00015854344,1.7204803e-8,2.2431773e-7,0.0000022684735,0.003489219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950564,0.000033529635,0.000053426043,0.00006288055,0.0002185894,0.00012595295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945086,0.000014063616,0.00018408107,0.00016981736,0.00007931097,0.00010187856],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003486703,0.000034771925,0.00006873216,0.0000042277156,0.005144157,0.00015255371,0.00076701125,0.00004079227,0.000835515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015718393,0.00003727581,0.0000681451,0.0000055658697,0.00029542317,0.00075595116,0.00012385561,0.00008711915,0.000012878732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008602111,0.000023526494,0.0017116589,0.0000015221674,0.000018284283,0.0000089343885,0.008950232,0.0000025370796,0.000059038273,0.98630875,0.00111225,0.0017946736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020269134,0.000010469984,0.009041224,0.000015177178,0.000014223873,0.0000018647607,0.0036253738,0.0000075496528,0.000008752191,0.0044213217,0.9825984,0.00005292656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15918298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33406502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014928663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054650372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99615103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767359026","doi":"","title":"Absorbing South Australia's Wills Act Dispensing Power in the United States: Emulation, Resistance, Expansion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Enforcement; Emulation; Doctrine; Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Political science; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.07678254969469327,"score_gpt":0.3774721211482265,"score_spread":0.3006895714535332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767359026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9284147,0.00000296878,0.0003068051,0.0078040375,0.000055872926,0.00023798001,0.0000045773945,0.00003179087,0.063141234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932775,0.000011551589,0.00021769736,0.00028282678,0.000057783156,0.000006154793,0.000011215083,0.0000052135847,0.006130092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991278,0.00008675992,0.00015635477,0.00015418677,0.00025518495,0.00021971804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992706,0.00009932814,0.000115480994,0.00040231278,0.00006589779,0.00004636562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006260974,0.000067476176,0.00007208837,0.000045540855,0.0016567004,0.00047831115,0.0003993792,0.00004873912,0.00013898157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015696435,0.000046274796,0.00003149909,0.0001880734,0.00017112357,0.00031582915,0.000039003302,0.00011054455,0.00004567868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029477083,0.0001144027,0.11118701,0.000009762376,0.000013907538,0.000009434751,0.19473585,0.00080663693,0.00026700823,0.6851983,0.00710595,0.00052223355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032311014,0.000008057738,0.5428451,0.000066740235,0.000009567482,1.7066255e-7,0.03528879,0.0003255496,0.00004290764,0.008640935,0.4122202,0.00022892158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011774155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029544117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67655736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046356086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039954775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767969853","doi":"","title":"A Good Faith goodbye?: Good Faith Obligations and Contractual Termination Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lloyd's maritime and commercial law quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Obligation; Law; Good faith; Political science; Fair dealing; Faith; Doctrine; Judicial discretion; Bad faith; Law and economics; Sociology; Judicial review; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.013978661039295258,"score_gpt":0.29527916078286465,"score_spread":0.2813004997435694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767969853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49281543,0.00010025093,0.00029168662,0.019027844,0.00024834133,0.00086956634,0.00019658114,0.00016057266,0.4862897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964967,0.000022872675,0.00024584247,0.00047039374,0.00045657557,0.000076170545,0.000034560915,0.000014031359,0.0021828667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985844,0.00011958082,0.00027150175,0.00035884854,0.00028508995,0.0003806133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889994,0.00016029662,0.00019554418,0.00038890223,0.000098570184,0.0002567675],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033427443,0.0001889945,0.00025483198,0.000041427495,0.0048792963,0.0012176121,0.0003763465,0.00018038013,0.00007677434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025301972,0.0001828168,0.00006657541,0.000067308465,0.00079140556,0.0010048638,0.000062669795,0.00022177807,0.000037988157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011413735,0.00011076742,0.0024237414,0.00000742542,0.000020469186,0.0000041390094,0.0043747807,3.5117125e-8,0.000054160813,0.9436811,0.00026485213,0.049047083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016570163,0.0004991438,0.22779696,0.0000662269,0.00014068632,0.000010780656,0.0024041273,0.00013526912,0.000065923356,0.14484811,0.62171483,0.00066092383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033956237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07141999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.798833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035929137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067765985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768672397","doi":"10.1353/llt.2017.0059","title":"Daunting Enterprise of the Law: Essays in Honour of Harry W. Arthurs ed. by Simon Archer, Daniel Drache and Peer Zumbansen","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Scholarship; Law; Sociology; Legal education; Political science","score_opus":0.017761200915965853,"score_gpt":0.2848265925646765,"score_spread":0.2670653916487107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768672397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.961396,0.000354928,0.000040109753,0.0038839085,0.000048318012,0.00017562999,0.00005309796,0.000009867797,0.03403814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324334,0.00019677271,0.000097223194,0.00008570925,0.000049058544,0.000009230748,0.0000015982829,0.000008511574,0.0063085747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990494,0.0001352396,0.00020443021,0.00016436039,0.00025093445,0.00019559902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992132,0.0000900872,0.00022682958,0.000344182,0.00007122187,0.00005444817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009579735,0.00007589617,0.00014750657,0.000014413396,0.0005376552,0.000090979134,0.0005147535,0.00007556675,0.000019730698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022788197,0.00006255785,0.000047322694,0.00006615069,0.00060009677,0.00018375857,0.0001090557,0.00019308337,0.0000026603223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004733233,0.0006659379,0.33931282,0.00014707693,0.000060917308,0.000003553506,0.084729895,0.000033070173,0.05626884,0.48874098,0.008978806,0.02101077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001723425,0.00004312367,0.60908955,0.00023335952,0.00004231223,0.0000010176551,0.027256632,0.00023852168,0.01778996,0.010481276,0.33263275,0.00046807848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040598255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021361474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4782597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016035483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009162822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99649614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769474352","doi":"","title":"R. v. White: Privacy in Common Spaces","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Apartment; White spaces; White (mutation); Law; Business; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.022256719890471833,"score_gpt":0.34122230611480425,"score_spread":0.3189655862243324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769474352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8748593,0.0004873638,0.0002520509,0.031787112,0.00012248228,0.00013054503,9.721272e-7,0.000021033064,0.09233915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98930866,0.002147532,0.000046072993,0.000050004157,0.0003536403,0.000004771912,3.9890924e-7,0.0000065370327,0.008082405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821836,0.00006886054,0.00014224631,0.00010403198,0.00020251842,0.0012639984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946433,0.000021807284,0.00016852435,0.00023823956,0.000032755157,0.000074328476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017765464,0.000060769227,0.00009946821,0.00004128496,0.0016706102,0.0003913203,0.0007551832,0.000053689313,0.00004685812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098507946,0.000055194796,0.000049271235,0.0000660879,0.00013291014,0.0003689101,0.00006599059,0.0009843706,0.000045856952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048483776,0.00003244626,0.1641604,6.306444e-7,0.000008155244,0.0000014248089,0.001719049,0.0000044723447,0.000007798604,0.8228659,0.00018570058,0.011009186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004100949,0.000044833454,0.09493856,0.00001557796,0.000008079496,0.0000151962495,0.006811549,0.000023027595,0.000008545436,0.67931277,0.21826306,0.00014870377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034636734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10105462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21807736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055732863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014899491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769845677","doi":"","title":"Philosophy of Property Law, Three Ways","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Salience (neuroscience); Economic Justice; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.047372108512942136,"score_gpt":0.30985864818866304,"score_spread":0.2624865396757209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769845677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05236078,0.0007015556,0.004246933,0.02996202,0.00020088676,0.00027941892,0.000005014759,0.000035679834,0.9122077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667376,0.00066927297,0.00009159299,0.000058892725,0.0005910811,0.000004332833,3.2284993e-7,0.0000071516347,0.0019036056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985823,0.00002073538,0.00014857722,0.00009630843,0.00024975554,0.0009023448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993385,0.000014107314,0.00022232204,0.00025655123,0.000098010794,0.00007047221],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012404877,0.000058685087,0.00010029715,0.000017532173,0.0020007861,0.000112442096,0.0006988775,0.000049421084,0.00003866889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007195463,0.00003893445,0.0000837841,0.00003711956,0.00032905978,0.00028292034,0.00005249089,0.00060693955,0.00003055363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005617336,0.00002958717,0.0006422894,0.0000014419116,0.000021368065,2.9624465e-7,0.00023877334,0.0000010182116,0.00012788872,0.9878921,0.000038196828,0.011001446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017551018,0.000063369764,0.00046952133,0.000009536787,0.000011494558,0.000005823668,0.00033837146,0.0000081709,0.00006249166,0.90633255,0.09245697,0.00006621573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048664473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04171454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023234589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013789051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771094306","doi":"10.7202/1043160ar","title":"Understanding Fiduciary Duties and Relationship Fiduciarity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Scholarship; Law; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Duty","score_opus":0.265366381501558,"score_gpt":0.35988028068368266,"score_spread":0.09451389918212466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771094306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017085342,0.00006864239,0.0010848095,0.007825783,0.00029417896,0.00008617387,0.000013317584,0.000046785837,0.97349495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980286,0.000055582193,0.0006056097,0.00022156663,0.000624014,0.000001670092,5.7100505e-7,0.000005346279,0.0004570661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924064,0.000100956386,0.00013949804,0.00010276417,0.0001951888,0.00022092818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994951,0.00013174351,0.00007174979,0.00007920626,0.0000731587,0.00014903078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008805277,0.00005345402,0.00006643667,0.000030793977,0.0123115545,0.00015407678,0.000113261085,0.000062195475,0.00023987422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000138536,0.000049293754,0.000031608477,0.00012447826,0.00048558973,0.00032065762,0.00003742952,0.00021632592,0.00003393369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026591993,0.000009306361,0.00249536,0.0000011425932,0.000005035624,0.000001199392,0.0010222843,7.1708087e-7,0.000004002702,0.9957137,0.0005311091,0.0002134988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113574446,0.000021021713,0.004352907,0.00001370215,0.000011343471,0.00001721111,0.0028145646,0.000019334437,0.000030261908,0.23544367,0.75707555,0.00008687692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017095278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037004177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98094326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017938942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020923731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771167011","doi":"","title":"Trust Proliferation: a View from the Field","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Respondent; Creditor; Settlor; Business; Blind trust; Service provider; Quarter (Canadian coin); Trust law; Service (business); Public relations; Accounting; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Marketing; Political science; Finance; Law; Economics; Debt; Computer science","score_opus":0.02735742480931214,"score_gpt":0.32216895906608556,"score_spread":0.2948115342567734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771167011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21210903,0.014626454,0.023888104,0.5951032,0.000850087,0.00084866723,0.000008808139,0.00013753446,0.1524281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914,0.0017349613,0.000058706395,0.0018640738,0.0017684702,0.000012761625,0.000001597026,0.0000049789523,0.0031544245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873245,0.000117857984,0.00012107358,0.00008005212,0.00025224863,0.00069631403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954486,0.00010993764,0.000061978906,0.00011029878,0.00008342095,0.00008953357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015761949,0.000048863378,0.000059407517,0.000008660487,0.0006524175,0.00015098936,0.00032063108,0.00004200585,0.00008133155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002452567,0.00003182182,0.00004402236,0.0001309711,0.000043717286,0.00014862866,0.00002056977,0.00070747104,0.00009205032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075292737,0.000017526641,0.0019331104,1.7650015e-7,0.00002084347,3.0330858e-7,0.0026876954,0.0000044895864,0.000004020808,0.9710868,0.0056332224,0.018604275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014035325,0.00003912406,0.00015357019,0.0000032774935,0.000010956984,0.00000534327,0.0060670157,0.000020437825,0.0000081720855,0.34769621,0.6458085,0.00004702129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021224378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02062381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77929103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003219995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032527607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772060348","doi":"10.30965/21967954-00703006","title":"Legal Justice or Social Justice?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of ancient Judaism","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Economic Justice; Law; Politics; Rule of law; Ideology; Judicial discretion; Sociology; Balance (ability); Law and economics; Political science; Judicial review; Psychology","score_opus":0.04834933086475986,"score_gpt":0.3593653180829019,"score_spread":0.31101598721814205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772060348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61389565,0.0003593619,0.01438309,0.10436679,0.0056850375,0.0003553636,0.000043507986,0.00008633367,0.26082486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846151,0.00013502687,0.00059740315,0.0013313097,0.0035114533,0.000002248787,1.5878238e-7,0.000008323817,0.009798963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985833,0.00007588316,0.0003466862,0.00010734886,0.00057821925,0.0003085539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884105,0.00018760041,0.00033976708,0.000088894696,0.0003459631,0.00019674888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094143173,0.00007683369,0.00015392591,0.00006941122,0.00075843075,0.000090907866,0.00036427955,0.00007433484,0.00043333016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048085724,0.000044236378,0.00012881945,0.00024701466,0.0002033045,0.0004425702,0.00004090156,0.00014278626,0.00012795551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011665384,0.00022619794,0.00012064255,0.000026456295,0.000033738273,0.000062252395,0.0053587174,0.0000052597247,0.011764803,0.6099826,0.36022297,0.012079698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043280542,0.00006444921,0.002192727,0.000026373022,0.00014076586,0.00001688738,0.0018062192,0.0000033116985,0.0001856607,0.00066854066,0.9943724,0.00008983086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052086256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009355745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6341495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016827024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006213849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5833313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772461067","doi":"10.29173/alr1412","title":"When is a Stranger a Constructive Trustee - A Critique of Recent Decisions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Context (archaeology); Constructive trust; Duty; Supreme court; Constructive; Law; Law and economics; Third party; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Business; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.06114194055624174,"score_gpt":0.37705872795701184,"score_spread":0.3159167874007701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772461067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038992036,0.020385696,0.00014822077,0.08256617,0.00007880298,0.001363054,0.000036766793,0.000024113886,0.89149797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35092112,0.6165232,0.002784088,0.022250367,0.00018742032,0.00034783833,0.000016055368,0.000029313229,0.006940626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895287,0.00013008295,0.00031472452,0.00019255257,0.00021651927,0.0001932665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883854,0.00045924122,0.00010712121,0.00029229588,0.0001840869,0.000118713084],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003067048,0.00008694443,0.00026799564,0.000013400383,0.00022003351,0.000022827644,0.00025621842,0.000056858065,0.0059782974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037162163,0.000073512194,0.00012094575,0.0002924936,0.00028122042,0.00013571655,0.000035470715,0.000089688554,0.00012507086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024140477,0.000047141417,0.00007698436,0.000058730206,0.000017361557,8.916809e-7,0.0016774188,3.129522e-8,0.000008226612,0.9582766,0.0067900936,0.03304409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008713454,0.000008992102,0.000032184176,0.0006391092,0.000053810494,0.0000042446336,0.0001503216,9.136456e-7,0.000018559116,0.019227665,0.97969085,0.00008622759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027671296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039935626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97290075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003481283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001392062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773199602","doi":"","title":"The Zombie Theory of Contractual Consideration: Richcraft Homes Ltd. v Urbandale Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Appeal; Zombie; Law; Element (criminal law); Corporation; High Court; Rationalization (economics); Corporate law; Unconscionability; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Management; Computer science; Computer security; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.019297215981912762,"score_gpt":0.30216031960793316,"score_spread":0.2828631036260204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773199602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65573657,0.012141665,0.036310013,0.09120814,0.0016658839,0.0013359247,0.000037157162,0.0001111425,0.20145354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985117,0.0033266877,0.000025532669,0.000051395473,0.0004185526,0.0000071193463,0.000001372058,0.0000061839073,0.011046119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984736,0.00017501017,0.00023432578,0.00009536431,0.00028356997,0.00073813094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986857,0.00029315217,0.0004980672,0.00024101246,0.00022327444,0.000058750753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037846146,0.00006898848,0.00010664445,0.00001952014,0.0047934367,0.0004624719,0.00044442856,0.000058508576,0.00005636063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062492734,0.000048599573,0.00007559399,0.000042840595,0.0005334317,0.00039503476,0.000027937529,0.0005755419,0.000019695073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019827477,0.000020873069,0.0009491991,5.73039e-7,0.000039102117,3.3642743e-7,0.0007577718,0.0000024074961,0.00014828147,0.9869713,0.0004934556,0.010596855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035852767,0.000062961655,0.003346628,0.000005690046,0.000026158043,0.000015282776,0.006211698,0.000014658999,0.00017766809,0.8803034,0.10939608,0.00008123749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033020263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015472655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32938048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002224393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028563102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99650216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774480689","doi":"","title":"Justice Cromwell and Fiduciary Duties: Placing Law into Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Duty; Geography","score_opus":0.025602547427360053,"score_gpt":0.33768608179214077,"score_spread":0.3120835343647807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774480689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5933176,0.0067805555,0.0029432068,0.03531463,0.0006831555,0.0003726516,0.000005411611,0.00008789088,0.36049488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99149793,0.003234139,0.00006885311,0.00031952138,0.0006475193,0.000003753762,4.407744e-7,0.000008490596,0.004219339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998424,0.00006095891,0.00014493804,0.0001427062,0.00018653813,0.0010408652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938613,0.00007397688,0.0001670273,0.00018912349,0.00006725683,0.00011649036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015738247,0.00007906115,0.00010499852,0.000021019949,0.005439121,0.0004919105,0.0004145955,0.00006472244,0.000039966293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016777427,0.00007271095,0.000045008554,0.00003081856,0.00037310386,0.0004589847,0.00007259259,0.0008293661,0.00003415912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073731358,0.000012613747,0.0002907199,0.0000037596535,0.00002051955,0.0000011740811,0.0033662221,0.0000014282941,0.000053801872,0.985493,0.00011985797,0.010629535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039461,0.000058781232,0.00045733227,0.000024026749,0.000063563624,0.00003678135,0.032174014,0.000031118547,0.00005136074,0.6835771,0.2829609,0.00017039734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011725289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098077364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39818034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037183193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011645135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776654465","doi":"10.29173/alr1420","title":"Restitution of Unlawfully Levied Taxes: Survey and Comparative Analysis of Developments in Canada, Australia, and England","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Restitution; Jurisdiction; Law; Demise; Political science; Supreme court; Common law; Judicial review; Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.1326694708435435,"score_gpt":0.37378674089291236,"score_spread":0.24111727004936886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776654465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848354,0.004252063,0.0000030009194,0.00033999962,0.0000094397365,0.00028560442,0.000033294258,8.233956e-7,0.010240383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98619115,0.013337416,0.00004216036,0.00008129787,0.0000026933167,0.000009812908,0.000022938959,8.166698e-7,0.00031171768],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991799,0.0001852038,0.00029344,0.00011896562,0.0001265284,0.00009598108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993725,0.0002793212,0.00013664563,0.00008842428,0.000069911715,0.000053236585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052298093,0.00005597658,0.00035027546,0.000025087176,0.00006913913,0.000006696253,0.00007580206,0.000020007115,0.000036472742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010569396,0.00004817322,0.000018604995,0.00067279924,0.00013836884,0.00006454158,0.000019595145,0.00003637391,8.636447e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005633141,0.000025316713,0.6553649,0.00020122828,0.00012819814,6.656869e-7,0.0009453963,0.000011942511,0.000008430035,0.34209764,0.00011642214,0.0010942357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010742929,0.0000048664324,0.69469744,0.0002773945,0.00012338778,2.5312397e-7,0.00005295782,0.000011198793,0.0000071108966,0.00002841079,0.30462164,0.00006790629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99979556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34206924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005678972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022233961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19644469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778321832","doi":"10.1097/hcm.0000000000000197","title":"Physician Personal Services Contract Enforceability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Health Care Manager","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kerr Wood Leidal Associates (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Damages; Denial; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Service (business); Personal injury; Health care; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02506901617228765,"score_gpt":0.3739265919828994,"score_spread":0.3488575758106118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778321832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28585622,0.0005738343,0.000040774237,0.16037759,0.00037511915,0.0009836188,0.000045732737,0.00011946478,0.55162764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913191,0.000049155973,0.000023370103,0.0067439103,0.00045492462,0.000026362992,0.0000041553126,0.0000054222437,0.0013735963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991683,0.000093914474,0.00010205724,0.00014587447,0.00021682896,0.0002730455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991759,0.000053742184,0.00014713532,0.00046859344,0.000060329538,0.00009431928],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005490838,0.00006047955,0.00009718584,0.000007701687,0.0044505643,0.00023057223,0.0005827816,0.000029251967,0.000061072344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017495431,0.000042893345,0.000057886573,0.00003557947,0.00024821857,0.00016694878,0.000087389446,0.000117814576,0.00011475131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002414172,0.00005289988,0.004981181,0.00022673765,0.000027339971,0.000001510852,0.23309182,0.0000044484773,0.000004848657,0.5366398,0.0030519816,0.2218933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010757958,0.000013582497,0.112819664,0.0000144448795,0.000007465803,7.58479e-8,0.026444413,0.00008491843,0.000002093789,0.0013775516,0.85904866,0.00007956012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05199473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02366046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85599667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001243882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015094996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778804371","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634100.013.47","title":"New Frontiers in Public Fiduciary Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Public law; Private law; Law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Political science; Commercial law; Administrative law; International law; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.04867858654963091,"score_gpt":0.31068507205555695,"score_spread":0.26200648550592603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778804371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012849712,0.001468339,0.0009568102,0.008769828,0.0015347622,0.0004097854,0.000033236887,0.000078134035,0.98673624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004222902,0.019333756,0.0027357698,0.0008481101,0.0012749583,0.000027814069,0.00013646034,0.000021131953,0.97139907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985193,0.00008480317,0.00022866845,0.0003535866,0.00038933288,0.00042431726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992664,0.00005731163,0.00009391747,0.0003303259,0.0000451536,0.00020689248],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027703325,0.0001503434,0.00028795103,0.00011124222,0.00020891114,0.00023483585,0.00066983857,0.00044287543,0.0019230082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004080271,0.00013613742,0.000101825164,0.0003699331,0.000093846385,0.00023475685,0.00011079789,0.00045553403,0.0005873338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4547494e-7,0.000011407372,0.00026264126,0.000008856474,0.0000066839225,3.8843794e-7,0.00024121212,1.8090051e-7,9.6812505e-9,0.41459498,0.55898494,0.025888259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010099551,0.0000040236428,0.00011706063,0.000038550083,0.0000074826603,7.9974164e-8,0.0007420868,0.0000040203163,2.9021822e-7,0.012670483,0.98613155,0.00018338209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055933673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039516393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4271466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027695793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001983528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779499954","doi":"10.29173/alr1421","title":"The Commercial Lease: Property or Contract","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Lease; Property (philosophy); Business; Security of tenure; Law and economics; Contract management; Property law; Real property; Law; Economics; Property rights; Finance; Land tenure; Microeconomics; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.062097771221809414,"score_gpt":0.3676729607118963,"score_spread":0.3055751894900869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779499954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031468147,0.024454974,0.000007936418,0.1656008,0.000109551256,0.0010204106,0.00000229835,0.000026070627,0.8084633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45988092,0.3586344,0.000035459416,0.03005257,0.0006228437,0.00033392926,0.0000082350325,0.000017286171,0.15041433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991027,0.0001638749,0.0001970675,0.00012616454,0.000172445,0.00023771476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988526,0.00064813474,0.00006908639,0.0002749322,0.00005763222,0.00009761676],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005406619,0.00007221358,0.00014887966,0.0000023606115,0.0012878303,0.00009278589,0.00036850414,0.00003254891,0.0010828632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004732566,0.000030738152,0.00007769486,0.00019204139,0.00023790186,0.000115780495,0.00003426834,0.00009921171,0.0007619793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005718275,0.000033996126,0.00013757547,0.00003859139,0.000009071216,0.000001526504,0.00015969208,5.977535e-8,9.984677e-7,0.88221353,0.021414217,0.09598503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058300364,0.000007889605,0.00013782279,0.00019080957,0.000026751795,0.0000020723744,0.000017131866,0.0000028197978,8.287688e-7,0.00017717262,0.9993072,0.000071157556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08110177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34904993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97789305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029384142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011806509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780438428","doi":"","title":"Negligence construction: does anything remain of Canada Steamship?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Liability; Law; Political science; History; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026369779185526937,"score_gpt":0.2581961531320378,"score_spread":0.23182637394651087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780438428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29590324,0.000028653121,0.0057665342,0.05568007,0.00068984035,0.00060369214,0.0001271082,0.00020234012,0.64099854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98358506,0.00007376187,0.0021359725,0.000057072044,0.00010788695,0.00000578743,0.000010499485,0.000008816804,0.014015162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987551,0.0000851621,0.00019164964,0.00030105474,0.00036798854,0.00029901834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802923,0.00008037401,0.00038697134,0.0008384268,0.00044015906,0.00022484332],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030776797,0.00010539285,0.00014507209,0.00018446909,0.003244429,0.00016494769,0.0011435654,0.0000784908,0.00025439353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029225336,0.000108837194,0.00006540839,0.00046801992,0.00071274297,0.001239612,0.00019106148,0.00015737527,0.00000886027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053152553,0.000034833625,0.005755083,0.00000551774,0.000019176257,0.0000015088751,0.0026864042,0.000019335552,0.00016865564,0.9854437,0.0015814672,0.0042789956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017178025,0.00000838569,0.012772273,0.000019823661,0.000020716718,0.0000010971626,0.025691003,0.000028072536,0.0006160655,0.0018191108,0.95867574,0.00017595751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24751736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50507283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037575647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017703449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781327244","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.6","title":"Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Doctrine; Administrative law; Political science; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Judicial review; Common law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Project commissioning; High Court; Sociology; Publishing","score_opus":0.2729267636078582,"score_gpt":0.5032675907602394,"score_spread":0.2303408271523812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781327244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010583966,0.0064485637,0.000007737801,0.027778406,0.00004354424,0.0007383728,0.0000102015,0.000012409142,0.9543768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939114,0.003986213,0.00022209762,0.0011572812,0.000057134544,0.000090846006,0.0000014511512,0.0000026040614,0.0005709781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991434,0.00017298108,0.00022940912,0.00012044324,0.00019786817,0.00013585815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919844,0.00012284429,0.00022838863,0.0003455282,0.00006847636,0.00003630721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011656838,0.000056732628,0.00016641384,0.000002735733,0.00125329,0.00011906247,0.0004733292,0.000024351615,0.00017420719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031724366,0.000037066453,0.000056080138,0.000053118813,0.00035370223,0.00014221633,0.00007360403,0.000106635984,0.000025800467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011479782,0.000012862907,0.00029804328,0.000082542356,0.0000022027532,3.6583486e-7,0.0002789164,2.2400211e-7,0.000006994441,0.99608827,0.00011792326,0.0031105361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015093919,0.000057128058,0.0031672062,0.0016508357,0.000021572072,3.9214052e-7,0.00023662811,0.000012705598,0.00009015404,0.021056658,0.97342986,0.00012594624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017473508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061872497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98332745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002275669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010250617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782880452","doi":"","title":"Trusts Through the Lens of Insolvency Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Creditor; Bankruptcy; Pension; Argument (complex analysis); Jurisprudence; Law; Law and economics; Business; Trust law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Debt; Medicine","score_opus":0.02413821200159258,"score_gpt":0.3212921656526844,"score_spread":0.2971539536510919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782880452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22158073,0.0019263475,0.0038081673,0.03734686,0.0003699138,0.00030227707,0.000005014912,0.00004616695,0.73461455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954198,0.0017316714,0.000061856364,0.00030047065,0.0008318786,0.000003035848,2.6501573e-7,0.0000057992356,0.0016452431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852335,0.00008681945,0.0001609849,0.00007896308,0.00023266267,0.0009171924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999557,0.00004384119,0.000119644945,0.0001358535,0.000115841765,0.000027803268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011059307,0.00005176924,0.00007344944,0.000011179195,0.001062655,0.000037006237,0.00039868007,0.000042335032,0.00009199787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004073598,0.00003435552,0.000071910465,0.00019158811,0.0005098619,0.00021468788,0.000027024129,0.0005682218,0.000046754954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037036468,0.000021516318,0.000057256042,4.3170382e-7,0.000018344677,5.3791055e-8,0.004360854,7.904213e-7,0.00008970469,0.9937432,0.00013561524,0.0015685415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009602242,0.00007905879,0.00012298125,0.000003876349,0.0000114894165,0.0000063409375,0.0058200425,0.0000025419217,0.00010557863,0.53229105,0.46141714,0.00004388302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003949793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036066957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77383906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021822414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012816796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783016775","doi":"10.7202/1042771ar","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Common Law Property Rights and Remedies in Addressing Environmental Challenges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental law; Tort; Legislature; Common law; Natural resource; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Enforcement; Political science; Sustainable development; Law; Environmental planning; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0478007788444951,"score_gpt":0.3046406056797497,"score_spread":0.25683982683525464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783016775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46836206,0.0038096441,0.0000043795776,0.0075860433,0.00021229203,0.0002586609,0.000013345592,0.000018328677,0.5197352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792594,0.0015976416,0.00013156983,0.00003295846,0.00016741459,0.0000029620296,1.3111418e-7,0.000003522603,0.0001378776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999303,0.00010979338,0.00017372337,0.00008003925,0.00017546458,0.00015802486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963367,0.00010829947,0.000111957735,0.00007570348,0.000020659154,0.00004973826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006245243,0.00004753684,0.000086530825,0.000008391201,0.0029309085,0.00004669275,0.00014048813,0.000031971536,0.000010400088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017471548,0.000025650794,0.000019387222,0.000027154261,0.0010198662,0.00017272227,0.000046505913,0.00014474,0.000002574825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017221877,0.000047498368,0.00019729638,0.000005107472,0.000008984213,0.0000033266913,0.007368962,7.9439695e-7,0.0006752453,0.95489115,0.000028339255,0.036756083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015261557,0.00003128498,0.0009031718,0.00009616721,0.000004052383,0.0000070348656,0.0019704914,0.000018745597,0.0012560688,0.012295581,0.9832119,0.000052899217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030054278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21848825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98318356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004063044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024496758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784067893","doi":"10.3968/9998","title":"Comparison of Administrative Charge Systems in Main Countries and Regions in the World","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charge (physics); China; Politics; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Virtue; Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.11663979213946385,"score_gpt":0.42222792182558994,"score_spread":0.3055881296861261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784067893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35151336,0.000106836174,0.000002982869,0.024977284,0.00011770621,0.00046833197,0.0000654629,0.000004472819,0.62274355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992699,0.000008954428,0.000005406627,0.00013411672,0.00006241564,0.000021877851,4.121168e-7,0.0000012602555,0.0004956404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919266,0.000062718325,0.000121818644,0.00012565222,0.00022455998,0.00027257466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995446,0.0000698001,0.000097479075,0.00012998993,0.000041130956,0.00011696521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012396739,0.000038998867,0.00009771648,0.00008787958,0.0022543753,0.00030412045,0.00063502934,0.000030242267,0.000009106585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001479503,0.000033365923,0.000010738132,0.0004064374,0.0024647766,0.00021975602,0.000021672686,0.000093594186,0.000002743074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7351546e-7,0.0000056020426,0.09006114,0.0000018570298,2.9511503e-7,0.0000013009266,0.02515455,1.13760805e-7,0.000010129565,0.8840642,0.0005901636,0.00011019941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013679074,0.000011993391,0.39148536,0.000037381014,0.0000031851698,3.5604222e-7,0.10915304,0.00008008779,0.000020445537,0.002110109,0.4968261,0.00013513936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34588474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9505419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8819541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023683683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011967239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784397268","doi":"10.29173/alr2483","title":"Local Governments and the Crown's Duty to Consult","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Scope (computer science); Indigenous; Local government; Government (linguistics); Point (geometry); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Law; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.01962598754770941,"score_gpt":0.3250097497421313,"score_spread":0.3053837621944219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784397268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020745017,0.009710563,0.00017646344,0.1060436,0.000096300326,0.0011429195,0.000006237479,0.00001614966,0.88073325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94610244,0.011751525,0.00008017908,0.033892356,0.0001470844,0.00009338524,0.000001073116,0.0000058527503,0.00792613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999343,0.00009760473,0.00012446547,0.00013225683,0.00016366602,0.00013902009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937594,0.00024527404,0.000039905546,0.00019819368,0.000044547563,0.00009611024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044848042,0.000053728814,0.0001262707,0.0000018030204,0.0004989274,0.000046612735,0.0001963498,0.000021510088,0.00034684816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022042119,0.00003231347,0.000033489025,0.00012815924,0.0008336698,0.000056633053,0.000081268256,0.000043138312,0.0006974458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031426764,0.0000064604546,0.000032885873,0.000025560827,0.0000057161233,7.436129e-8,0.00048431696,1.2815065e-8,9.02193e-7,0.9848588,0.008475883,0.0061062616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011671232,0.0000072296198,0.000113284,0.00015371767,0.00002464726,5.687442e-7,0.00005142396,0.0000024840676,0.0000070878896,0.0007122674,0.9987601,0.000050464507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039647892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053161208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027226079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029975334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96674716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W278529428","doi":"","title":"Progress and paradox: the remarkable yet limited advance of employment Good Faith duties in canadian common law.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative labor law & policy journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Good faith; Sociology; Fair dealing; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06557344148897327,"score_gpt":0.368046371583262,"score_spread":0.3024729300942887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W278529428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8234984,0.0014331915,0.0000033241784,0.00896116,0.000057002304,0.0004222159,0.000073632356,0.000013522784,0.16553752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985143,0.00017173146,0.00027194826,0.00064682646,0.00010242384,0.000026585118,0.0000015202581,0.000006415313,0.0002582376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870825,0.00027528143,0.0002846556,0.00012090156,0.00019850126,0.00041243722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908733,0.00011638652,0.00018748072,0.00016152057,0.00017333194,0.00027395083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049092097,0.000108628425,0.00022296021,0.00006369295,0.0008444799,0.00010088542,0.00034347415,0.00004556284,0.000038235954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024901767,0.00007836812,0.000030398242,0.00044818613,0.0009804029,0.00024567792,0.000042274256,0.00025916466,0.0000042518623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017159386,0.000055064236,0.022213059,0.0000026751966,0.000016722684,0.000003356926,0.025947828,0.000006551956,0.000008990807,0.9513313,0.00027772103,0.000119537784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066100084,0.00016268413,0.17373762,0.00011758745,0.00002486226,0.000018606823,0.012798151,0.00005272162,0.00088703976,0.098467916,0.7127933,0.000278545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5915702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91198057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85286343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016925493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053760107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6495142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785381600","doi":"10.1515/til-2018-0009","title":"Class Action Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Compensation (psychology); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Mechanism (biology); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.050430366174970855,"score_gpt":0.40489152223698555,"score_spread":0.35446115606201467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785381600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071962975,0.000012444778,0.035691433,0.010895956,0.00042745555,0.00019016609,0.0000038395406,0.00011973278,0.880696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739933,0.000012922819,0.00035053937,0.001054204,0.00075333746,0.000017042184,0.0000014040534,0.00000642441,0.00040482415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991726,0.00013606937,0.0001276848,0.00014327336,0.00017691539,0.00024343097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952275,0.00015710815,0.000021968972,0.00016935349,0.00005147691,0.000077344484],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053292484,0.000055524397,0.00007738182,0.00001870752,0.0003872103,0.000064104075,0.00020779397,0.000091135094,0.0010980358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015337145,0.000049675593,0.00002676619,0.00020695475,0.08024656,0.00013785424,0.000062195744,0.00011760785,0.00033384835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010986887,0.000027006748,0.000056212168,0.0000014377797,0.0000016807087,4.0076213e-7,0.0029894765,9.2788935e-7,0.000086114036,0.9957721,0.00032055727,0.0007330956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006292995,0.0000240606,0.000029705025,0.0000055684877,0.0000029057746,2.421027e-7,0.0010971298,0.000097877484,0.00081683503,0.72828287,0.2695185,0.00006138809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001378956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002609631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9254363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069820104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043230528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785682043","doi":"","title":"Chapter 3 - Public Benefit and the Substantive Public Law-Private Law Divide","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Doctrine; Commercial law; Municipal law; Political science; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022330442370739,"score_gpt":0.2643437563897173,"score_spread":0.2420133140189783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785682043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3786593,0.004522582,0.0065708705,0.44350204,0.00021975739,0.00056073576,0.00001691452,0.00011817446,0.16582961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98970294,0.0072616395,0.000013476326,0.0006867018,0.00037374752,0.000014258924,4.7741537e-7,0.000012506818,0.0019342562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975373,0.000118555254,0.00020081617,0.00017920151,0.0003297155,0.001634401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992071,0.00018889343,0.00014290187,0.00017764673,0.00012530365,0.00015817277],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002879799,0.00010715726,0.00013227008,0.0000347527,0.0018563684,0.00039662403,0.0004814179,0.000060153405,0.00010565561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091340604,0.000056020555,0.000089663205,0.00014691523,0.00096688187,0.00068216544,0.000088419474,0.0005799709,0.000051432824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001035606,0.000012431244,0.00046604552,3.181012e-7,0.000047262118,3.0269427e-7,0.00047770113,4.2563443e-8,0.0000585775,0.98576367,0.0000107591295,0.013152536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005451941,0.00001821809,0.00016619138,0.000004531345,0.000010197175,0.0000135707305,0.0006063548,0.0000012806724,0.00001509484,0.6718046,0.3267379,0.0000768648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012573666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059826877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61104363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034142632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043710583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785704511","doi":"","title":"Property Law in Scotland: Contrasts with Québec?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011979062312756741,"score_gpt":0.2760439192782633,"score_spread":0.2640648569655066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785704511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24339765,0.0000032846601,0.000042406922,0.010269044,0.000023541195,0.0001777228,6.7183606e-7,0.00004015635,0.74604553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897837,0.0000013398002,0.00035843422,0.00044661993,0.00006620467,0.000022754868,4.3683636e-7,0.0000028183265,0.0093177045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963707,0.000012199628,0.00005316578,0.0000845783,0.00009133061,0.000121664605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980295,0.00002293969,0.000012218149,0.00008253201,0.000024572255,0.00005479443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014352916,0.000030748706,0.0000438832,0.000008292801,0.00015490665,0.00004224038,0.000102689606,0.000029347004,0.00029861165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013793817,0.00001569796,0.000008296906,0.00008263345,0.00016492594,0.00009112911,0.000010163329,0.000099334546,0.000067597226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045882257,0.000042535263,0.028435493,9.1623457e-7,0.0000014624115,8.812551e-7,0.0014785833,9.349146e-7,0.00048048294,0.96717095,0.0003641292,0.0020190603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019278208,0.000013272851,0.00892641,0.000002844332,0.0000013840349,4.083084e-7,0.00041772512,0.00002328295,0.00016730728,0.0006727096,0.9895175,0.00006437644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61152995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9882011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014973066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019996095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3910569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787200607","doi":"10.29173/alr1362","title":"The Devil Is in the Disclosure: The Role of R. v. Stinchcombe in Establishing Appropriate Disclosure Rules for Administrative Tribunals","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Law; Legislature; Political science; Supreme court; Administrative law","score_opus":0.05791606666371546,"score_gpt":0.34657442719945886,"score_spread":0.2886583605357434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787200607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03352077,0.24256007,0.000027160377,0.3947534,0.00012240249,0.008816912,0.00018686043,0.000021889407,0.31999055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96930295,0.027419569,0.00004312399,0.0016155235,0.00008697211,0.00073233555,0.000008959525,0.000010021185,0.0007805452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814534,0.00056067575,0.000492573,0.0002026718,0.00029920624,0.000299504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961015,0.00312195,0.00024726352,0.00042511095,0.0000662152,0.000037983504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024953159,0.00012433472,0.00027046664,0.0000084580315,0.00066815957,0.00017162913,0.00095891993,0.00005243772,0.0000692132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095313654,0.000055371398,0.00014959599,0.00048313307,0.0003393566,0.00020426475,0.000058326896,0.00020575758,0.0000144234145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027313856,0.00007576242,0.000778801,0.00009344079,0.000011249085,1.4980635e-7,0.007978315,6.089948e-7,0.0000019491683,0.97576463,0.0010780612,0.014214302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011207321,0.000017231008,0.0005576662,0.00042840847,0.000038687882,5.021182e-7,0.0021264153,0.000040832216,0.0000146341135,0.021833217,0.9747416,0.00008873457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013273066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13424018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029050561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060879687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99329764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787245113","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0030","title":"Overcoming Dicey in administrative law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Administrative law; Law; Judicial deference; Political science; Public law; Delegation; Legislature; Judicial review; Accountability","score_opus":0.033788770659844036,"score_gpt":0.310458407285915,"score_spread":0.27666963662607097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787245113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06458178,0.000053876225,0.0002264036,0.00086195325,0.00007221859,0.000052695104,0.0000054255233,0.000007862752,0.93413776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978219,0.00006218914,0.0010167074,0.00006521752,0.00015925382,2.3320506e-8,2.957163e-7,0.0000016105623,0.00087280397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952054,0.00006513374,0.00007318147,0.0000673253,0.00014530578,0.00012851364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963856,0.000034128563,0.0000818943,0.000060136954,0.000091071146,0.000094206895],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026170234,0.000035476336,0.00007283788,0.0000067348083,0.0009142323,0.000026774887,0.00022289669,0.000040583036,0.0012915903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009998366,0.00004012571,0.000041731535,0.000027939808,0.0005018329,0.0004701572,0.000035323203,0.00008263309,0.000011044281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020136713,0.000038091985,0.00051449105,9.2710184e-7,0.0000075815424,0.0000067898,0.016700927,8.2659847e-7,0.000082802384,0.9817975,0.00030879534,0.0005211427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003449456,0.0000678514,0.0031429764,0.000023588485,0.00000938712,0.0000024487965,0.031146262,0.000014513407,0.00007344619,0.0027694968,0.96233267,0.000072413015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32913256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90107924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002713664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009364258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787708624","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0069","title":"The proper role of policy in private law adjudication","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Statutory law; Private law; Law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Politics; Law and economics; Opposition (politics); Sociology","score_opus":0.009596039025498703,"score_gpt":0.2588751311499375,"score_spread":0.24927909212443877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787708624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10903688,0.00026600872,0.00012623894,0.0038874403,0.000040430135,0.00013490186,0.0000042451247,0.0000075513663,0.8864963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987135,0.00028336936,0.00030602168,0.000023166762,0.00013316945,5.3319795e-8,1.9339144e-7,0.0000014130197,0.00053912535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995642,0.00006423785,0.000080099606,0.000045220724,0.00014399245,0.000102274054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961084,0.000023171408,0.000118579665,0.00008465171,0.000114670496,0.000048081856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032342097,0.000025305939,0.00005109403,0.000007500936,0.0008890683,0.000015777625,0.00029958473,0.000028585897,0.0001394952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018787921,0.000020906404,0.000031878913,0.00004405555,0.0007693702,0.00025519822,0.00004318214,0.000052571824,0.0000053477293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013495173,0.000023183899,0.0004042233,6.9440813e-7,0.0000055641044,1.5610344e-7,0.0077502476,0.0000014193358,0.00047349877,0.98830014,0.00007731818,0.002950036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017575084,0.000033607725,0.006774125,0.00001247845,0.0000057752627,5.9972933e-7,0.010492092,0.00002071726,0.00028377838,0.008882193,0.97328395,0.00003491908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33601534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61236864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001991929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103854174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68380845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788281616","doi":"","title":"A Rudderless Regime: The United Kingdom's \"Enlightened Shareholder Value\" as a Model for the Duty of Loyalty in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Kingdom; Shareholder value; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Value (mathematics); Business; Shareholder; Accounting; Political science; Law; Finance; Corporate governance; Mathematics; Geology; Statistics","score_opus":0.03817949935838256,"score_gpt":0.3008976125834446,"score_spread":0.26271811322506206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788281616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9278808,0.0003205218,0.00055756985,0.011001905,0.00029199122,0.0017803936,0.00022874729,0.0000252176,0.0579128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821025,0.0001566259,0.00037794048,0.000057603567,0.000028823346,0.0000059555314,0.000101725615,0.000011973893,0.017156847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989796,0.00006764716,0.00012273948,0.00021235892,0.00038883177,0.00022880672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998654,0.00026468615,0.00036004643,0.00038013706,0.00027272233,0.000068382724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003227706,0.0001301,0.00023580348,0.00003105542,0.0006755568,0.000017371656,0.0009554355,0.00019309521,0.0010597775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006570654,0.000107977765,0.00012442318,0.00016399963,0.00015301423,0.00013532168,0.000053610733,0.00023951507,9.14572e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078876107,0.0002443012,0.00043771582,0.00033702547,0.00036330888,0.0000060281227,0.41142336,0.006423454,0.0006931169,0.5537684,0.012710371,0.012804175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018149547,0.00005080278,0.07619651,0.00025502587,0.00051250757,4.689322e-7,0.7331067,0.107742645,0.00011069824,0.0016104822,0.077897675,0.00070158794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5521579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041314022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028651722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788593743","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v11n1p62","title":"Interfering Busybody or Public-Minded Citizen? The Actio Popularis as a Model for Reform of the Rules of Standing in Constitutional Cases in Australia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Action (physics); Commonwealth; Enforcement; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.13865041830127536,"score_gpt":0.4030420231664005,"score_spread":0.26439160486512514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788593743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929073,0.000011215861,0.00042314536,0.002193898,0.00005811204,0.00010183654,0.000047302314,7.952255e-7,0.004256392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999346,0.000010170698,0.0002585028,0.00007162162,0.00008946342,0.0000023187117,2.6400687e-7,0.0000016983372,0.0002199405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993907,0.000024847355,0.00027952658,0.00003922972,0.00014029218,0.00012537203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994859,0.00008840013,0.0001879633,0.000054814987,0.00014564021,0.000037292186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047885173,0.000037176214,0.00010353561,0.000040860905,0.00018209766,0.000035148925,0.00014141884,0.000036239704,0.000013355103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013477892,0.000020108075,0.000042515378,0.000074142445,0.00073480874,0.00011667076,0.00003209854,0.000095070835,8.7016254e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017590548,0.000025621779,0.0010074823,0.000008178066,0.0000077514715,5.695152e-7,0.001696512,0.000013984917,0.00018357922,0.9969973,0.000014120725,0.00002731653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034157028,0.00066801213,0.017322801,0.00093170383,0.00014001122,0.00018650787,0.048240665,0.009997482,0.006826038,0.83891624,0.07294726,0.0004075665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005268992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011661287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15808105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012388002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002694904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7965175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788845882","doi":"","title":"Halsbury's Laws of Canada. Labour","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018778903237941274,"score_gpt":0.2650953110187141,"score_spread":0.24631640778077282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788845882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07200249,0.000076147175,0.0000020398315,0.00597945,0.00022177622,0.00021358022,0.00029738576,0.000009682217,0.9211974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91517884,0.00021160576,0.0001897329,0.00024448195,0.0002269843,0.000015587873,0.000004500943,0.000011874897,0.08391637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879026,0.000037406913,0.00025939214,0.0001675616,0.00033040266,0.00041496713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984433,0.00005444699,0.00024847523,0.0005560265,0.00015319073,0.00054457254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030974127,0.00009620115,0.00020773284,0.0001036772,0.0009337452,0.000048356746,0.00076933915,0.00008549508,0.00030567148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028853156,0.00010267213,0.000053687505,0.00010686406,0.00029661148,0.00014314658,0.000042620937,0.00009788911,0.000006193439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021523927,0.000009746297,0.0104633095,0.00001724918,0.000015424106,0.000008738625,0.00093008514,0.0000034535665,0.000020590434,0.950416,0.034819048,0.0032941767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009136402,0.000006447897,0.055632554,0.000014242807,0.000009220947,2.7308099e-7,0.00027638525,0.0000014572016,0.000060209717,0.002250185,0.9415469,0.000110721456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94816583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018910709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006057732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788912459","doi":"","title":"Le droit français du mandat à effet posthume, une innovation attendue de la loi du 23 juin 2006, La revue du notariat, Montréal, septembre 2009, volume 111p.381 à 391. Domaine : Droit civil, droit comparé. Référencer revue avec comité de lecture","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0060688026526147425,"score_gpt":0.2132821068750658,"score_spread":0.20721330422245104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788912459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31323773,0.0031776861,0.2684334,0.25061503,0.0005983183,0.00260327,0.00111053,0.0007157168,0.15950835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94713104,0.0030935062,0.015200488,0.0010657021,0.00055752374,0.0003054235,0.0022667258,0.00015415765,0.03022545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860386,0.008154573,0.0017984869,0.0017734809,0.00089251477,0.0013423306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890411,0.0028324695,0.0017050273,0.0028049166,0.0030150488,0.0006014313],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012881404,0.00096351537,0.0012664722,0.00044267296,0.0027643514,0.0012800135,0.00317144,0.0014170499,0.00058359164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019214757,0.0012182739,0.0005910564,0.0030487776,0.0016868506,0.00058791856,0.0012719502,0.0023887933,0.00035255193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097999306,0.002371375,0.01812532,0.00036035915,0.00026115178,0.00008196325,0.035027284,0.0045314375,0.0021943552,0.87691706,0.044688974,0.015342726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024851537,0.0000092075725,0.107866704,0.0029619723,0.0003692938,0.00026679994,0.00057666353,0.049034953,0.0016549008,0.06968732,0.76322395,0.0018630928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.088679954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15054284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80722976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010890573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015755568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789720708","doi":"","title":"Ontario law reports [new series]: cases determined in the Court of Appeal and the High Court of Justice for Ontario.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; High Court; Political science; Economic Justice; Law of the case; Series (stratigraphy); Court of record; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.021645448539044033,"score_gpt":0.2535542562102732,"score_spread":0.23190880767122918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789720708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51643103,0.00008981433,0.000027825481,0.013927894,0.00023830694,0.0016081204,0.00016582657,0.000008206685,0.46750298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778031,0.00006933789,0.00032925626,0.00025375094,0.000105726715,0.000056714227,0.000004078531,0.000007062398,0.021370962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989044,0.000060333656,0.00040500527,0.0001586843,0.00022241537,0.00024914922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986946,0.0005041508,0.00025115474,0.00029225586,0.00009680545,0.00016105529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007209758,0.00009401181,0.00024078245,0.000060437927,0.00021897594,0.000017553642,0.00025300222,0.00007130329,0.00006954483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016956545,0.00005549387,0.00006120482,0.0000972164,0.0005893249,0.00011854186,0.000021694214,0.000073091665,4.6288721e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008401157,0.000023187065,0.010506606,0.000032481425,0.00002390886,0.000025168376,0.022698538,0.0000018828861,0.000017823862,0.9579235,0.0069278404,0.0017350833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004976611,0.0000530244,0.017388407,0.000038549555,0.0000864579,0.000013152137,0.00088958675,3.8526213e-7,0.00002559924,0.009335333,0.9715834,0.00008844326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001929404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002821249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50047743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789745396","doi":"","title":"La longue traversée vers le droit à réparation : La norme canadienne applicable aux acheteurs indirects","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Concurrences","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.035345145944439146,"score_gpt":0.2894811734474325,"score_spread":0.25413602750299336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789745396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68134856,0.004592731,0.0021871082,0.05086994,0.002131976,0.0009971508,0.00047341402,0.00017580471,0.2572233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701016,0.0018981886,0.0001009641,0.000060175724,0.00054252153,0.00010762005,0.000016155978,0.000016407836,0.027156368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980045,0.00030770845,0.00032296372,0.00050745206,0.0002068081,0.00065057597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827147,0.0006571011,0.00022633019,0.00026866244,0.00011036248,0.00046608533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077779236,0.00021703071,0.00028719034,0.00006609607,0.0005867885,0.00014642031,0.0005484129,0.00029679816,0.00043242314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021343051,0.0001994328,0.00012910056,0.0006045649,0.0012583733,0.0005704984,0.000062570674,0.00023474076,0.00042791496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005501201,0.00009360077,0.0014891982,0.0000610749,0.000038048733,0.00001112131,0.0076104077,0.000022476908,0.00039475126,0.71564335,0.002738566,0.27189192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036569568,0.000049497507,0.0021587387,0.00023473492,0.000053500433,0.000009934364,0.002678142,0.00013651694,0.00026925752,0.005491229,0.98822004,0.00033273146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05078799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106775366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98548144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032420212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013727372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9555329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789900073","doi":"10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4140","title":"Improving the Mechanism to Examine Judgment Debtor’s Ability to Satisfy Civil Judgments in Vietnam from International Experience","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VNU Journal of Science Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Enforcement; Sanctions; Civil procedure; Political science; Law; Commission; Business; Creditor; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.04979406834714484,"score_gpt":0.37247098971386183,"score_spread":0.322676921366717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789900073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972925,0.00010985943,0.0018751514,0.021653792,0.0014730872,0.0003162682,0.0000068886015,0.000010067579,0.0016298871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435455,0.00005152341,0.0033099263,0.001475983,0.00062911236,0.000034871435,8.1618225e-8,0.000004107693,0.00013983958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748456,0.000072246716,0.00047996893,0.00031016924,0.0012734983,0.000379529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985123,0.00015451461,0.00023324821,0.00020786937,0.00067531195,0.0002167419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025023546,0.000113193055,0.00019107196,0.00015977267,0.0012538469,0.00027129418,0.0013729085,0.000025838044,0.0000732869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016171045,0.000075932134,0.000050446735,0.0009932105,0.0012895664,0.0007699975,0.0005393074,0.00016319564,0.000026124098],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018417975,0.00057011866,0.026250316,0.000011765058,0.000111771806,0.000026995394,0.58918893,0.00050963217,0.20729835,0.060494877,0.0047493475,0.11060372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017275434,0.0013207131,0.23870157,0.000544333,0.000068267684,0.000015468608,0.35674933,0.001385917,0.031482667,0.012061219,0.3547542,0.0011887576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034826004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009433002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35000485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006820731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028199665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9643703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789986146","doi":"","title":"Canada's legal inheritances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.01349940512750042,"score_gpt":0.23674664981248614,"score_spread":0.22324724468498572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789986146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023137938,0.00010352633,0.0000073479264,0.018206513,0.00021273064,0.00016874926,0.00020383534,0.000019447985,0.9579399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91942185,0.00041275483,0.00014987793,0.0006219054,0.00031021875,0.000024906698,0.0000023102161,0.0000106077705,0.079045594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894124,0.000039423237,0.00019109315,0.00016215879,0.0002733587,0.00039271484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906486,0.000085808184,0.00006760264,0.00019543403,0.00007696024,0.0005093467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016133253,0.00008271152,0.00012506275,0.00010201913,0.0002920813,0.00002247185,0.000325225,0.000058580474,0.00035524546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010649871,0.00006638716,0.00003703736,0.00022084305,0.00017620412,0.00014510354,0.000014768804,0.000051927585,0.000018020477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021564044,0.000005044614,0.0044400124,0.0000039248125,0.000008892441,0.000010089045,0.00027466385,4.0087986e-7,0.000032960816,0.8887873,0.08711222,0.019322304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007608763,0.0000071853315,0.008794055,0.000013933528,0.0000048643137,4.1550194e-7,0.0001614327,1.8254136e-7,0.000026844822,0.0010722242,0.98973066,0.00011209414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90261847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003604652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007293873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790267939","doi":"10.29173/alr1369","title":"The Mere Busybody: Autonomy, Equality and Standing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Disadvantaged; Interdependence; Ideology; Law and economics; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0669137808131832,"score_gpt":0.348133299462869,"score_spread":0.28121951864968575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790267939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005126358,0.10110157,0.00001803035,0.06794568,0.000054090433,0.00046255754,0.0000027682188,0.000023998293,0.8298787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71182525,0.2567027,0.00007599861,0.004559358,0.0001589247,0.00009838165,0.0000020686584,0.000010061587,0.02656726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992574,0.00013326289,0.00017022612,0.00013271137,0.00012638576,0.00018001355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917805,0.00043315272,0.000066130415,0.00021469849,0.000026336205,0.00008163982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065265934,0.000059255886,0.00012108899,0.0000025679144,0.0011547083,0.00010526232,0.000188523,0.000025215566,0.00041734034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014169636,0.000038546616,0.00004473113,0.0001255161,0.00022282275,0.00010971073,0.000048580692,0.0000711099,0.0001503358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.01270935e-7,0.0000056114714,0.000066393,0.000052003335,0.000004977481,6.81533e-8,0.0004994406,2.1733424e-8,5.769588e-7,0.9817638,0.0019516634,0.015655372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025693853,0.0000027190072,0.000044498298,0.00015088572,0.000019349496,4.0752968e-7,0.000053162916,0.000011413613,9.536823e-7,0.0015996249,0.99803156,0.000059718073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017035946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03141403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004355837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024783874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790393806","doi":"10.29173/alr1273","title":"The Odhavji Decision: Old Ghosts and New Confusion in Canadian Courts","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Supreme court; Law; Confusion; Estate; Statement (logic); Political science; Tort reform; Sociology; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.024076508577918744,"score_gpt":0.33201215652054084,"score_spread":0.30793564794262207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790393806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01212811,0.13147418,0.000002468048,0.35108286,0.00010556247,0.0010675581,0.000003108334,0.0000136815215,0.50412244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.722214,0.23738149,0.0001136952,0.0250467,0.00027607294,0.0000425784,0.000004310253,0.000010798687,0.014910398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992295,0.00005605858,0.00018262077,0.00013994137,0.0001328359,0.0002590805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990318,0.00038201708,0.00003942416,0.00020178566,0.000025522972,0.00031949082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000549729,0.00006248694,0.00011713012,0.0000098626715,0.0005675048,0.00008090343,0.00021157377,0.000041007617,0.0002792211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021268048,0.000042845135,0.000029472396,0.00014798934,0.00009821175,0.00010169479,0.000031374242,0.00008038422,0.00018384647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.1403266e-7,0.000003965881,0.00046661892,0.000009617088,0.0000013542133,4.810499e-7,0.00028833144,1.9165323e-7,3.8158524e-7,0.8867214,0.019567188,0.09294009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005840542,0.0000021257165,0.001133472,0.0003424149,0.0000072934054,0.0000011345564,0.000013652721,0.000008737533,5.9148886e-7,0.0011926857,0.9971786,0.000060889986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9459815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008744959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030711226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43648455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790421020","doi":"10.29173/alr2451","title":"Protecting Individual Self-Interest in Aggregate as the Basis of Fairness in Contract","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Mistake; Unconscionability; Regret; Law and economics; Welfare; Economics; Self-interest; Business; Contract theory; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.059609552485860355,"score_gpt":0.35015325888519466,"score_spread":0.2905437063993343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790421020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7086642,0.010476066,0.0000052147943,0.03698744,0.00011867585,0.003539931,0.0000062644276,0.000032397373,0.24016982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563444,0.0027875516,0.000034221095,0.0012077008,0.0000676956,0.0001372105,0.0000010891317,0.0000058177993,0.00012430163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888164,0.00032909706,0.00031708094,0.00015110696,0.00012727441,0.00019380028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990722,0.00046040153,0.00016699257,0.00021068758,0.000053027507,0.00003669586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015286474,0.00007174975,0.00020463332,0.000015932445,0.00019801542,0.000033790282,0.0003896661,0.000043964614,0.00018438043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005860143,0.000049122245,0.000053449745,0.0004418517,0.00020055844,0.00012663924,0.00006421326,0.00016779985,0.000088764675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026928954,0.00008920691,0.0028508166,0.00025702963,0.000015400516,9.996901e-7,0.007391357,1.5944778e-7,0.0000136916215,0.9686546,0.00007010022,0.020653948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022146915,0.000036356538,0.0042128908,0.003224927,0.000041096275,0.0000021829137,0.00038377222,0.000012143988,0.00037369615,0.0024492675,0.9888903,0.0001519004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15379119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47184294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003513875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089457986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8518438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791057227","doi":"","title":"Do Ontario School Boards Have Too Much Statutory Power? A Comparison of Expropriation and Eminent Domain in Ontario and Michigan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Eminent domain; Statutory law; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.02403258433258691,"score_gpt":0.29984578817834817,"score_spread":0.27581320384576125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791057227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882371,0.00014074834,0.000035892994,0.0019588666,0.00011723654,0.0001961998,0.000031419557,0.000004571977,0.009277956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850875,0.0000759317,0.00050177035,0.00019175436,0.00003593507,0.0000056343283,0.000018087498,0.00000763455,0.0006545133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867296,0.00008913742,0.0003765462,0.00016736607,0.0004006386,0.00029337592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880296,0.00005827663,0.00038015936,0.00019668667,0.00020295818,0.00035897474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057715876,0.000117615644,0.00022162334,0.000086548134,0.0015636113,0.00041192697,0.00024581474,0.000070581904,0.00014257322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007143023,0.00011285961,0.000022523167,0.000060639144,0.00028218873,0.00029536517,0.00006786442,0.00054609973,3.0511794e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085153944,0.00010955579,0.82675886,0.00001275825,0.00006240768,0.00003840856,0.12016701,0.00009122271,0.00027427758,0.048603974,0.0028860637,0.00091032375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007475145,0.000058638383,0.3275519,0.000053887645,0.000017394432,0.0000073363194,0.034023855,0.000046991252,0.00007080902,0.0031681794,0.63406384,0.00018967634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99837625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6311778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011108957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027560242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791157503","doi":"10.29173/alr1411","title":"Caveat Emptor and the Sale of Land: The Erosion of a Doctrine","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Caveat emptor; Doctrine; Vendor; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.02088761539591849,"score_gpt":0.3152954154727956,"score_spread":0.2944078000768771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791157503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124616176,0.19454245,0.000034670804,0.13978286,0.00009307833,0.0027371324,0.00001227839,0.000017082257,0.53816426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8676668,0.12944396,0.000013955549,0.0008346918,0.00003859461,0.000029274988,0.0000012783357,0.000002411913,0.0019690758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948,0.00011083583,0.00016036413,0.00006453214,0.000110617846,0.000073663396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992624,0.00039377023,0.000092475726,0.00019415557,0.00003388999,0.000023310293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047845757,0.000038545342,0.00015098197,0.0000027977208,0.00016446144,0.000008686014,0.00017512105,0.000015995845,0.00011831279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009411092,0.000017317147,0.000054491622,0.000146394,0.0003980828,0.000034012723,0.00003255739,0.000039710125,0.000010168182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004091862,0.000017134704,0.0007463959,0.00008305207,0.000005929926,4.157299e-8,0.000874564,1.3787061e-7,0.00001566815,0.9942844,0.000673676,0.0032949045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001563547,0.0000068326385,0.0005647974,0.00039580066,0.00004862691,0.000001061726,0.00003558035,0.0000029797036,0.000017094302,0.0016302643,0.9971122,0.000028388655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06750709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027229765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99643856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005328776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019614774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791426591","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Superior Court of Justice holds that communications between corporations and the Competition Bureau during the proffer stage of the immunity program or the leniency program should not be protected by settlement privilege (Nestlé Canada)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Stage (stratigraphy); Law and economics; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.08580636171020671,"score_gpt":0.32664526603790495,"score_spread":0.24083890432769822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791426591","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38713807,0.00024231931,0.00008465441,0.5883119,0.0001938921,0.013504075,0.0017125733,0.00013776758,0.008674774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963696,0.00012777868,0.0007886534,0.00034515993,0.00006688904,0.0035495718,0.00014819072,0.000019033048,0.0053177695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967558,0.0011691271,0.0005449529,0.00021842834,0.0009516528,0.00036003953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634004,0.0011402274,0.0004943118,0.0014183102,0.000503968,0.000103120714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020949156,0.00020235791,0.00024242536,0.000022632064,0.006142342,0.00025716968,0.0018013482,0.00008706873,0.00020035086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034398987,0.00008419215,0.00010407016,0.00048072435,0.0034819737,0.00010139142,0.00050961,0.0007225532,0.0000036201634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031924486,0.0020200948,0.018284827,0.00021812052,0.00044014846,0.0000012065404,0.057641864,0.00011053859,0.0005201366,0.89439213,0.024480887,0.0015708075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006552717,0.00007384934,0.043155573,0.000050548755,0.00017381836,0.0000025860786,0.018351156,0.000048889477,0.00017858036,0.00025163463,0.93691796,0.00014014216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4643855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87193334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9124371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030076885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014887766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792390369","doi":"","title":"The common law basis of Aboriginal entitlements to land in Canada, the law's crooked path","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Path (computing); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0039002070609369644,"score_gpt":0.20694801895539944,"score_spread":0.20304781189446247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792390369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13943215,0.00023157996,0.0000017808756,0.008046855,0.0002595498,0.00040688392,0.0005132372,0.0000026652529,0.8511053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732694,0.00037323282,0.000033867876,0.001044233,0.000055236535,0.000030691117,0.000034998993,0.000011767796,0.025146578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976302,0.00009122313,0.0003034191,0.00016223636,0.0015353935,0.00027756055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916077,0.00028945095,0.00019277667,0.0002005191,0.0000017913796,0.00015471035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000035742745,0.00013232231,0.00019421865,0.00000912185,0.0006167612,0.000040366478,0.00046827114,0.000025826967,0.000043527587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002129282,0.00009615698,0.000023730901,0.000117847216,0.000088627996,0.00009824234,0.000040209226,0.00015776568,3.909489e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011170053,0.000013974132,0.015455694,0.000048711303,0.000031278654,0.000011250065,0.0006422799,0.000025011059,0.00010129342,0.97952217,0.0017858796,0.0022507843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014368212,0.000014482464,0.042282138,0.00010246359,0.000020382755,1.9399248e-7,0.01688125,0.000045739496,0.002864967,0.0017089297,0.9357762,0.00015959195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99380094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9778132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051351846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006549998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792894764","doi":"","title":"By All Unlawful Means? An Inquiry into the Scope of the Unlawful Means Tort","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Tort; Law; Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Interpretation (philosophy); Supreme court; Scope (computer science); Liability; Legal certainty; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06812664938748614,"score_gpt":0.38641440689530343,"score_spread":0.3182877575078173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792894764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91357267,0.008605593,0.0002957543,0.04078743,0.0018770505,0.0005123976,0.00002110728,0.000037641137,0.034290366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941886,0.0018680112,0.0002734257,0.0009924254,0.0014779536,0.0000072573316,6.0017226e-7,0.000016175592,0.0011755691],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977566,0.0003279949,0.00059751293,0.00017063633,0.0008396181,0.00030764155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788904,0.00019963266,0.0006057641,0.00035667332,0.00082622806,0.00012265748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018584182,0.00016092054,0.00033774337,0.000038523922,0.0013962633,0.0001122792,0.0011749185,0.00007062857,0.00003426867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003937262,0.00008493852,0.00019225715,0.00041367774,0.002197351,0.000494465,0.00026695235,0.00031765222,0.000011265225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001624668,0.00066627853,0.0058218255,0.000051635387,0.0013493786,0.00001109377,0.58420783,0.000105656116,0.0051007816,0.17873202,0.20980784,0.013983208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024750986,0.00023460336,0.0018797575,0.00005900726,0.00012806791,0.0000058763767,0.032994993,0.000006156199,0.0016538176,0.0025401553,0.960114,0.00013604872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002881149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012867789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7503062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014123127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026913214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793072605","doi":"10.29173/alr1295","title":"Making Sense of Juristic Reasons: Unjust Enrichment after Garland v. Consumers' Gas","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Supreme court; Law; Liability; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Restitution","score_opus":0.032022895671059405,"score_gpt":0.34557724581775,"score_spread":0.3135543501466906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793072605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024535159,0.14638834,0.00020979962,0.031251326,0.00025003715,0.002445168,0.00003843426,0.000067502304,0.7948142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660894,0.030638007,0.00034447465,0.0019394725,0.00005187829,0.00008889049,0.0000049438454,0.00000917745,0.0008337049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900717,0.000088070854,0.00028839544,0.000190154,0.00020806308,0.00021813116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923176,0.00019212237,0.00013279913,0.00028862385,0.000066088,0.00008860483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000321073,0.0000993737,0.000254693,0.000011457047,0.00018413535,0.000026126536,0.00013279314,0.00004334856,0.0004072448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017342437,0.00008413899,0.000100985235,0.00020227021,0.00022018045,0.00009316768,0.0000429025,0.00007776598,0.0002212917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036710267,0.00007186439,0.00034914608,0.00053057005,0.000022149972,0.000005406573,0.0007040951,0.0000010255179,0.000005641778,0.9964306,0.00045489133,0.0014209698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013069165,0.000012197138,0.00019414928,0.002076358,0.00012605134,0.0000041121307,0.000046269324,4.1975105e-7,0.000008634874,0.002061595,0.99522,0.00011952236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023916904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024286946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006860557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119819415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793158076","doi":"10.7202/1043449ar","title":"LA PORTÉE DE L’ARTICLE 1275 DU CODE CIVIL DU QUÉBEC À L’ÉGARD DU FIDUCIAIRE","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016264742648930984,"score_gpt":0.25005387768728626,"score_spread":0.23378913503835527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793158076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55637175,0.0009240541,0.0013560373,0.3920662,0.0007842088,0.00031634432,0.0001127685,0.00014030826,0.047928337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98059607,0.001738627,0.0002576631,0.0010751155,0.0037681633,0.00006972152,0.0000044429144,0.000044011536,0.012446184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766713,0.00034285663,0.00046065665,0.0005135575,0.0002849557,0.0007308572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795467,0.00067600334,0.0002302611,0.00050401996,0.00015999474,0.0004750743],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011727277,0.00025486894,0.00032975012,0.000036134807,0.000861741,0.00014292968,0.0005779417,0.0003046662,0.00315587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092265866,0.00022018462,0.00025155634,0.00036019602,0.0006446753,0.00041100336,0.00020854402,0.00023645516,0.0018169006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037528232,0.0006519988,0.20811978,0.00008404299,0.000104595405,0.0001300936,0.02362302,0.00006776643,0.0019517458,0.6606436,0.06268037,0.041905485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056013383,0.00003870113,0.03800537,0.00014048221,0.00010424785,0.000052542553,0.00084088376,0.00079242856,0.00022608873,0.001976582,0.95691437,0.00034818417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07952636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24124709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.894234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007681579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012479475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793500892","doi":"","title":"The long crossing to the right of compensation: The Canadian rule for indirect purchasers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Compensation (psychology); Normative; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.061994080708448786,"score_gpt":0.37225255675714825,"score_spread":0.31025847604869944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793500892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065259524,0.13830024,0.0014544647,0.8068697,0.0011019667,0.005573622,0.0002294181,0.0000388863,0.03990575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869936,0.009783879,0.000035824505,0.0014983045,0.00020829796,0.00029533857,0.0000024662204,0.0000037724253,0.0011784995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914575,0.0001524464,0.00019862666,0.00010985777,0.00018186345,0.00021145094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865866,0.0007402919,0.00012465232,0.00023201318,0.00015233508,0.000092031],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016778822,0.000056534536,0.000112612026,0.000009433302,0.003293558,0.00017966755,0.000674252,0.000020232806,0.000101266356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050666934,0.00001989747,0.00007411433,0.00027275961,0.0007137102,0.000066397646,0.000027964086,0.00004752765,0.000047409714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.786478e-7,0.000004404877,0.00069958286,0.000067920344,0.000014814256,1.1949204e-7,0.0024392814,8.358698e-7,0.000004486231,0.22072998,0.020350195,0.7556874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028603363,0.0000055155615,0.0012668847,0.00038496632,0.000016354816,2.128979e-7,0.00012935478,0.000003354601,0.000018048737,0.00082904135,0.9972746,0.000043109692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019951984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5587173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006634225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074062694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794621684","doi":"","title":"A Canadian Court holds that information received by the Competition Bureau at the proffer stage of its immunity and leniency programs is not protected from disclosure to other accused persons by settlement privilege (R / Nestlé Canada)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Competition (biology); Law; Political science; Stage (stratigraphy); Business; Finance","score_opus":0.032469389434262655,"score_gpt":0.26394266478290906,"score_spread":0.23147327534864642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794621684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5282019,0.00012974253,0.00015485192,0.44186494,0.00011408016,0.004257612,0.012406172,0.00006294914,0.012807804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98760074,0.000020218939,0.00018749108,0.0035977848,0.00003976995,0.00085573294,0.0008857771,0.00001546108,0.006797001],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983146,0.00027452683,0.00026148368,0.00019400296,0.0006088601,0.0003464994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882996,0.00009208496,0.00018083777,0.0003601243,0.00024136486,0.0002956377],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055161805,0.00016217014,0.00015147793,0.00003924119,0.00140286,0.00017389047,0.00042208759,0.0000865838,0.0017916567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088239605,0.00011391883,0.000038556493,0.00026287074,0.0002276394,0.00016609547,0.000092618524,0.00022842555,0.000076230725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008814725,0.00028940453,0.0058147646,0.000051816613,0.00010932666,0.0000010345124,0.069401234,0.000030151457,0.0022652796,0.024050113,0.8971529,0.0007458045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032486004,0.000041347226,0.004574971,0.000037233684,0.000019824181,5.282746e-7,0.012553461,0.00002290855,0.00049693306,0.000043864322,0.98172444,0.00015959995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9392042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9591978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4593989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057953305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008144951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795436897","doi":"","title":"THE DUTY TO TAKE CARE AND LIABILITY FOR THE ACT OF THE THINGS IN COMPARATIVE LAW","year":2007,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Law; Liability; Tort; Duty of care; Common law; Delict; Political science; Comparative law; History; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.02923578739723541,"score_gpt":0.32379871994610354,"score_spread":0.2945629325488681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795436897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90766436,0.0012792725,0.0002497083,0.06109285,0.00026906864,0.002606903,0.00013124707,0.000029743107,0.026676849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954111,0.00011574916,0.0002164093,0.002642424,0.00011088723,0.00007564407,0.0000021967126,0.000012037582,0.0014135384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849784,0.0001821335,0.00035966837,0.0003002337,0.00027092773,0.0003891918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967909,0.0022654363,0.00023744708,0.00052090344,0.00006348729,0.00012185775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059553265,0.00015228457,0.0002449916,0.000019149657,0.0012759289,0.0000844799,0.00095922453,0.00005783354,0.000033012067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098504286,0.00007780234,0.00013207225,0.00094182795,0.001625719,0.000371717,0.00030073672,0.00023718899,0.000004248279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016174963,0.00013078556,0.19218534,0.000037810263,0.00008277753,5.114769e-7,0.20164467,0.00009275804,0.00008403652,0.5635184,0.010448121,0.031613052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015304358,0.000108073844,0.49016643,0.000021406304,0.000026123249,1.165718e-7,0.08323233,0.00011216324,0.0005594029,0.0012562361,0.42422718,0.00013750394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073969044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022189576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5622621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055471442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002146517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795542233","doi":"","title":"The Canadian abridgment; a digest of decisions of the Provincial and Dominion courts, including appeals therefrom to the Privy [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Political science; Law; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.028500963277824823,"score_gpt":0.2744876459327224,"score_spread":0.2459866826548976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795542233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40451786,0.00027743747,0.000023193203,0.06539093,0.0003460408,0.0020106267,0.0008685831,0.000010755578,0.5265546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952677,0.0004135843,0.000043583717,0.00025124365,0.00016685858,0.000053414165,0.0000011712633,0.0000113904525,0.003791075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986062,0.00012903906,0.0003472167,0.00017170998,0.00035643086,0.00038938763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982255,0.0005433279,0.00019965491,0.0004473273,0.00013456476,0.0004496105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090734084,0.00010380412,0.00016319672,0.00011328747,0.0014423768,0.000044870125,0.00077361934,0.0000782491,0.000021143005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006100897,0.00004975705,0.00006858383,0.000279251,0.0005419221,0.000071270886,0.00010279272,0.00009050349,0.0000036393321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151832055,0.000016786758,0.018111806,0.0000071574887,0.000037945596,0.0000010450872,0.009400728,0.0000049389964,0.00030722743,0.90385514,0.012600609,0.055641446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011905922,0.000017359169,0.054384667,0.00006876773,0.00001724393,4.611827e-7,0.0006079011,0.0000012378033,0.00009975284,0.002303721,0.9423004,0.00007942119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96910524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99948794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9296998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026371388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003148285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796058516","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Superior Court holds that presumptions that by possessing documents, persons and firms are deemed to know their contents are unconstitutionnal in a criminal context (Durward)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Possession (linguistics); Law; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Competition law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Collusion; History","score_opus":0.04486810574890933,"score_gpt":0.2987878819149554,"score_spread":0.2539197761660461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796058516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96645665,0.00033470223,0.0014120416,0.019886842,0.00018117325,0.0007711457,0.00009049808,0.00005992737,0.010807013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903169,0.00007841676,0.00012255894,0.00092866604,0.00006250047,0.00014975567,0.000009902636,0.000009031291,0.008322216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985122,0.00015290333,0.00020481262,0.00034836523,0.00033286502,0.00044882903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906445,0.00023146902,0.00011252144,0.0002468212,0.0000891206,0.00025562022],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005179555,0.00017744246,0.00020925658,0.000047070716,0.0020407042,0.00067300134,0.00034853048,0.00009643987,0.00014635072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011590971,0.00012220243,0.000071732065,0.0001319963,0.0005743495,0.0004216328,0.00011111218,0.00022192676,0.000024088135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060464103,0.00020229221,0.8958886,0.00001534297,0.000052179883,0.0000029657017,0.042821884,0.000013402476,0.00034489328,0.03671465,0.018008726,0.005874577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006141188,0.00002680186,0.19849172,0.00012019505,0.000030446245,0.000003596946,0.07614084,0.00007812062,0.00013706204,0.000297053,0.72381914,0.00024093056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105965145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77860284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70581037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031079966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001894489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796292634","doi":"10.29173/alr1331","title":"Civil Procedure and Practice: Recent Developments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Civil procedure; Apportionment; Substantive law; Focus (optics); Procedural law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.04160276071165178,"score_gpt":0.36642476051991424,"score_spread":0.32482199980826243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796292634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008979153,0.03904607,0.000008350538,0.0309442,0.00004358531,0.00053675805,5.7290754e-7,0.000013611493,0.92931706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12880069,0.8162944,0.0028412445,0.036400177,0.00007832609,0.00028509327,0.000008904413,0.000021279155,0.015269881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991915,0.00016720156,0.00015525983,0.00016617848,0.00015503958,0.00016479654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934953,0.00026009465,0.00007547401,0.00012518451,0.00008456766,0.00010512693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067344407,0.00006672966,0.00011769963,0.0000046420896,0.00037858204,0.00004580397,0.00009719742,0.000034267825,0.0003882798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019300117,0.0000558645,0.000019514982,0.00021092745,0.00007948106,0.00019389801,0.000021318036,0.00006532941,0.00017523213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4083674e-7,0.000026135847,0.00006064977,0.00014332884,0.000007815608,4.1260705e-7,0.00045051568,1.3722258e-8,0.0000013325325,0.98671716,0.0051362272,0.007455956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044381803,0.0000032169353,0.00003538257,0.0002826944,0.000027979699,0.000007641991,0.000070432376,5.817667e-8,0.0000039501565,0.00075065595,0.99869233,0.00008127053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021040742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014854768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033760898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018601156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8289309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796895794","doi":"10.29173/alr1306","title":"The Accidental Consistency: Extracting a Coherent Principle from the Jurisprudence Surrounding Solicitor Client Privilege between the Police and the Crown","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Jurisprudence; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; CLARITY; Legislation; Accidental; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030443105785296565,"score_gpt":0.3481412483199762,"score_spread":0.31769814253467965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796895794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52572095,0.08875311,0.00008458276,0.31065246,0.0007366137,0.007507298,0.000047219804,0.0000869056,0.06641085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97159207,0.023278,0.000031355725,0.003643497,0.00072202086,0.0003007483,0.0000045359843,0.000014904339,0.00041289852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977331,0.0005927261,0.0004964022,0.00029693393,0.00046522694,0.0004155875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916423,0.0071217543,0.00036745408,0.0006932581,0.00006843313,0.000106802516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024496864,0.0001778129,0.00028390152,0.000004164564,0.0051801563,0.0005660953,0.0011748378,0.000055121414,0.000036385263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059877743,0.00007145951,0.00017781123,0.00025861803,0.0013581577,0.00021567663,0.00033867,0.0003697103,0.00007143364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005254012,0.000020403664,0.0038232848,0.000029198478,0.000059653194,2.485256e-7,0.007719846,0.0000012837903,0.0000070295805,0.98474157,0.0004225398,0.0031697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026136526,0.0000071776285,0.008397281,0.00060343905,0.00018694122,0.000003651949,0.0013119236,0.000004024528,0.000013021631,0.0025307704,0.9865467,0.00013368133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29880348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3255812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98612416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011505776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001997452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99611497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799918838","doi":"","title":"THE CANADIAN DEFAMATION ACTION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Liability; Law; Cause of action; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Action (physics); Business; History","score_opus":0.1280207382448755,"score_gpt":0.39891407069006696,"score_spread":0.2708933324451914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799918838","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040522555,0.008095643,0.0000019921406,0.58914435,0.00022242512,0.00065999525,0.000014611611,0.0000121647,0.4014436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589108,0.02834692,0.000009583039,0.0050782715,0.00028128186,0.00007491654,0.0000051281827,0.0000067866326,0.007286311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992893,0.00010753252,0.000098910554,0.000081749844,0.00014000783,0.0002825372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988537,0.00003756768,0.00008894419,0.0005588527,0.000077146964,0.00038381576],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012513378,0.000048905487,0.00006341661,0.0000140755365,0.015846511,0.0005822834,0.0007426536,0.000039622824,0.00020801365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043328447,0.000029789702,0.000044368764,0.00006857967,0.00024960274,0.00012864798,0.000012634118,0.000119502714,0.0007089911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.1531774e-7,6.001947e-7,0.00017521053,0.00001883699,0.0000050233357,5.879672e-7,0.00030519222,3.4574083e-7,3.3058816e-7,0.86213833,0.04267993,0.0946755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012049163,9.775688e-7,0.0072537637,0.00007776597,0.000014176851,5.934133e-7,0.000060963637,0.000005594918,5.450409e-7,0.0020396132,0.99048924,0.00004472407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069166935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024117131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800282355","doi":"","title":"Fiery Foundations of Federalism: The Enduring Legacy of Citizens Insurance Co v Parsons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Constitution; Parliament; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Federal jurisdiction; Federalism; Legislative history; History; Politics","score_opus":0.036016540194533896,"score_gpt":0.3541027533810449,"score_spread":0.31808621318651104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800282355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93426394,0.0003310683,0.001350895,0.014899382,0.00013002683,0.0001619019,0.000014059999,0.0000116050705,0.04883709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99584013,0.0020185264,0.000042092957,0.00003768371,0.00025739663,0.0000065986196,9.710354e-7,0.000006122038,0.0017904757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863875,0.0000822313,0.00022899055,0.00008494233,0.00025256493,0.0007125044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902624,0.00009835774,0.00043114912,0.00027806277,0.00012120567,0.000044979843],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013714813,0.00006049287,0.00011906647,0.000027973138,0.0029144764,0.00020707326,0.00066847884,0.000036172234,0.000029162218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022878694,0.000046227073,0.000106968706,0.000069783506,0.00039672363,0.00036482813,0.000038829046,0.0005966058,0.000005668662],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053927615,0.000031828567,0.0073944107,0.0000027681144,0.000048971513,2.2311919e-7,0.0016295053,0.000013057792,0.00051135814,0.98500746,0.00012136741,0.0052336627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010559362,0.00013372644,0.17819588,0.00008993611,0.00008139983,0.00005201479,0.021525947,0.000045992234,0.0018169262,0.6759424,0.12071795,0.00034186384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00246963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010925289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30906504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016509315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016912749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803669274","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3256","title":"Jurisdiction Motions and Access to Justice: An Ontario Tale","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Subject-matter jurisdiction","score_opus":0.05337845899815491,"score_gpt":0.37127220465974176,"score_spread":0.31789374566158685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803669274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12230987,0.000019826513,0.0051964587,0.0053785006,0.00044618794,0.00016633843,0.000007599407,0.000046648107,0.86642855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405,0.000029171077,0.0016822052,0.000585568,0.0013422054,0.000007742534,0.0000017747993,0.0000072915664,0.002294028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920183,0.000059748516,0.00014512445,0.00014809812,0.00021903573,0.00022616515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992612,0.0000153517,0.0000652221,0.00012095479,0.0001643782,0.0003728858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038596967,0.00006516988,0.00007260279,0.00003612464,0.0030654392,0.0006704762,0.00026359878,0.00005793851,0.0005986163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022424461,0.00006151575,0.00002805012,0.00012958028,0.00018534057,0.0008204235,0.00006236455,0.00019611215,0.0000747033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060065177,0.0000776695,0.0011156135,0.000001915472,0.000009108278,0.0000021491476,0.008184531,0.000021327247,0.00020851975,0.9855771,0.0016094289,0.0031866191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034330392,0.00019223898,0.04079327,0.000033117212,0.00010801096,0.000053834927,0.0022675318,0.000089027606,0.00015700258,0.07453775,0.8811644,0.00026055894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36397916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9724949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91103935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014883776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015016555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804810499","doi":"","title":"Reynolds V Times Newspapers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Newspaper; Political science; Doctrine; Reputation; Common law; Duty","score_opus":0.011108891139427774,"score_gpt":0.30247503267494974,"score_spread":0.291366141535522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804810499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16256945,0.0011235195,0.0038255604,0.03360074,0.000437296,0.00021192782,0.0000019506244,0.00014015955,0.7980894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96095294,0.0016725581,0.00012364498,0.00026430277,0.0017239148,0.0000029640821,4.977709e-7,0.000008445899,0.03525076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998034,0.00006357925,0.000121803605,0.00010968416,0.00022467416,0.001446277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996049,0.000024214592,0.00006826282,0.00010711855,0.00009471164,0.00010081234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012871838,0.000060330807,0.000066757835,0.00003624553,0.0011186948,0.00008985137,0.0003138768,0.000055910263,0.00040399603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006404579,0.00005268488,0.00006236844,0.00020660754,0.00021886645,0.00016806106,0.000022858172,0.00060041185,0.0004114393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041862654,0.000013963638,0.00031766066,2.0565065e-7,0.000018527833,2.2729607e-7,0.0012081326,5.409965e-7,0.000104712315,0.9794086,0.0013883436,0.017534873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012474974,0.00008091723,0.0002239908,0.0000029953806,0.000010043375,0.000015149018,0.0062680077,0.000007849678,0.000039666193,0.2931813,0.6999616,0.00008369985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010566952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015351668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7983835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051018654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023249364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8604209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805016895","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3255","title":"Six of One, Half a Dozen of the Other? Jurisdiction in Common Law Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Dozen; Law; Nova scotia; Common law; Statute; Political science; Choice of law; Civil law (Civil law); Geography; Public law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02106967937403747,"score_gpt":0.28313572769290785,"score_spread":0.26206604831887037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805016895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10645395,0.00004107218,0.000039824557,0.0062983795,0.00017634753,0.00012418759,0.000017376155,0.0000051531515,0.88684374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991193,0.000012553739,0.000118829485,0.0002988523,0.00023377652,0.000002298896,2.9375974e-7,0.000005420387,0.00020867403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903405,0.0001329691,0.000265191,0.00006830525,0.00034287188,0.00015659064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941343,0.000046976806,0.00022052493,0.00014705595,0.00010870921,0.000063286825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047770835,0.000048915746,0.00011802861,0.0000132497835,0.00052772,0.000025881662,0.00032524782,0.000047153408,0.00011664143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011177575,0.00003711176,0.00004773828,0.00016319857,0.0003482637,0.00009449305,0.000036180896,0.00017828404,0.0000022218073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067619158,0.000048876984,0.0026940298,0.000003163529,0.00000904043,3.8495037e-7,0.0011279457,0.000019050416,0.00036164335,0.99503,0.00029783053,0.00040125818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087220705,0.00011064277,0.026078764,0.00023307424,0.000049424532,0.000012764178,0.002507124,0.00015840138,0.009019759,0.21108548,0.74963516,0.00023719764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99397904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99982786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8926653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001302872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031571835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40588492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805636555","doi":"10.1017/s0268416018000085","title":"James Muir, <i>Law, debt, and merchant power: the civil courts of eighteenth-century Halifax</i> (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016). Pages xvi + 286. $70/$34.95 hardback and ebook. JamesMuir, Law, debt, and merchant power: the civil courts of eighteenth-century Halifax (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2016). Pages xvi + 286. $70/$34.95 hardback and ebook.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Continuity and Change","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Law; Political science; Power (physics); Business; Finance; Physics","score_opus":0.01986276004927923,"score_gpt":0.2403215951156515,"score_spread":0.22045883506637226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805636555","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21788506,0.71572906,0.000057429745,0.0018465908,0.0007440937,0.003794474,0.0032924213,0.00013045732,0.056520417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57410353,0.424762,0.00007361744,0.00013673083,0.00015824358,0.000010902082,0.000025449142,0.000031538057,0.0006979686],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955513,0.00077799405,0.00073177327,0.0010890512,0.0009260496,0.00092386326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961752,0.000521541,0.001070737,0.0010068535,0.0006595983,0.0005660527],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015537026,0.0007006488,0.0012297257,0.000015222756,0.0015145272,0.00016650208,0.0009831252,0.00051472196,0.00059796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058137543,0.00056386663,0.00025842286,0.000052593827,0.0055838255,0.0015499936,0.0012529221,0.00029168243,0.0000020452733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00320982,0.0027706316,0.011535292,0.002203219,0.0031648597,0.000059929058,0.33091542,8.878606e-7,0.008565992,0.26032713,0.34141678,0.035830025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002815904,0.0005665771,0.012762173,0.00062590424,0.0007945108,0.000011354319,0.03649552,0.00006362916,0.0013919272,0.00031590473,0.9433252,0.00083139614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39667174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69378495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60190845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033936085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020380576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806922772","doi":"","title":"La bonne foi et la common law : L’arrêt Bhasin c. Hrynew (Good Faith and the Common Law: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Bhasin v Hrynew)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Humanities; Law; Common law; Political science; Obligation; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00947501948766091,"score_gpt":0.28983918546824394,"score_spread":0.28036416598058306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806922772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82153654,0.0018979311,0.0003522006,0.047597714,0.000117134245,0.000498651,0.000018895602,0.00002079783,0.12796015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972657,0.0013094567,0.000047631962,0.0007284096,0.00019122982,0.0000102278345,0.0000016982553,0.000016384056,0.00042925333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966295,0.0010912396,0.0004031846,0.00018139153,0.00059072644,0.0011039722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980214,0.0012399852,0.00023895645,0.00028344934,0.00010566484,0.000110494235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007784894,0.0001498652,0.00027100137,0.0000331985,0.0011960416,0.00017964594,0.0007002759,0.0001147806,0.000022800006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009142426,0.0000913289,0.0000753632,0.00027272885,0.0011145964,0.00016569278,0.00011340378,0.0015007667,0.0000021399437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008723179,0.00005108975,0.0011312476,0.0000020139364,0.00003090935,0.0000017944744,0.002160076,0.00001034387,0.000037017602,0.9910144,0.0003978911,0.005075955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018070898,0.00013725182,0.0048161955,0.00006692025,0.000045004923,0.00010501,0.009376493,0.0001528633,0.00009335412,0.68367326,0.29953727,0.0001893098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6162588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3790305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050561654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030936725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91991055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809097328","doi":"","title":"CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND THE CONCEPT OF LOYALTY","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Duty; Plaintiff; Duty of loyalty; Fiduciary; Law; Political science; Sociology; Advertising; Business; Law and economics","score_opus":0.08262759396344879,"score_gpt":0.3401623697814748,"score_spread":0.257534775818026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809097328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014929444,0.17763351,0.000008237894,0.56798625,0.000056559693,0.0017089244,0.000060263854,0.000010913688,0.23760587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98225236,0.012737344,0.0000069173507,0.004501444,0.00002474776,0.00000412832,7.8056047e-7,0.0000013046086,0.0004709912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957937,0.00010969729,0.00012486079,0.000044587967,0.000054620035,0.00008687666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995676,0.00006919807,0.00006989724,0.00015970282,0.00004640721,0.00008718985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006286327,0.00003054855,0.00012478653,0.000006631917,0.00017561892,0.000009945103,0.00022856442,0.000015727433,0.00012940924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001361551,0.000016068121,0.000034105895,0.000098362245,0.00054933596,0.000017450226,0.00000821814,0.000052179625,0.0000071007325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2932425e-7,0.0000012443969,0.000011194171,0.000019437859,0.0000026619148,7.657454e-8,0.0013383371,9.443454e-8,0.0000010420816,0.9846331,0.0020370937,0.011955292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067468805,0.0000056841727,0.000889302,0.00021617026,0.000020520461,3.8147277e-7,0.00010914298,0.0000014710215,0.000009315452,0.0026281222,0.9960292,0.00002323557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21459459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.468278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021197897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019080316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7906355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809276071","doi":"10.7202/1048585ar","title":"L’examen critique des gages spéciaux : révélations autour de ces techniques d’appropriation directe de la valeur","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.016043705454347686,"score_gpt":0.3120133573599545,"score_spread":0.2959696519056068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809276071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6223579,0.0008526464,0.14292006,0.008622038,0.00018091705,0.00052324275,0.0001142529,0.0005784961,0.22385044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92252165,0.0016859573,0.049188934,0.00060408306,0.001485138,0.00016240717,0.000017260418,0.000043465072,0.024291119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997544,0.0008049841,0.00030426914,0.00037055742,0.000256091,0.00072012586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984137,0.0006420947,0.00016947852,0.00028903788,0.0002078313,0.00027789376],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019323324,0.00021433781,0.00021199332,0.00010521517,0.0016866336,0.00031433642,0.00044934012,0.00065592915,0.00032318482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077036326,0.00025479283,0.00014010664,0.00058630283,0.0029924067,0.0004339336,0.00006114109,0.00064958184,0.0000762806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007901555,0.00014525813,0.0066415775,0.00006847915,0.000048958045,0.00000940361,0.03742615,0.000020333064,0.0039496394,0.87734556,0.0021590623,0.07217765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015680399,0.00008098259,0.03533672,0.00014046404,0.0001443695,0.000030000261,0.0034201376,0.0016383759,0.012527277,0.5611927,0.3848853,0.00044685882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008118089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002590534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38272625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019057407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005835757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810323610","doi":"10.21991/cf29360","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Legitimacy; Legitimation; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0191935199108331,"score_gpt":0.2674869927135426,"score_spread":0.2482934728027095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810323610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5368831,0.00095629913,0.06651037,0.06601984,0.00084286433,0.0015353878,0.0012823865,0.0001245516,0.3258452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975092,0.0000716103,0.00045503158,0.0010255293,0.00013778218,0.00003969361,0.00003323525,0.000003877239,0.0007240521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986738,0.0000730116,0.00027390348,0.00023200954,0.00032584523,0.00042141878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989755,0.00021722067,0.00015787061,0.00016130874,0.0003098747,0.00017819896],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005585056,0.00012826225,0.00014176649,0.000041747182,0.0028684214,0.0000874885,0.00015586994,0.00011539108,0.0002756067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044168986,0.0001112483,0.000041003117,0.00015644068,0.0060394937,0.000340166,0.000105521816,0.0001175056,0.0000069484213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002227187,0.000013316189,0.021691658,0.000008947271,0.000019064662,8.211791e-7,0.00043500212,0.00008076582,0.00027821492,0.9693001,0.007485363,0.00066447485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009911853,0.000054868822,0.021136908,0.00010435706,0.00008408923,0.00012675184,0.0070664356,0.0029550088,0.0015627053,0.08974469,0.87574047,0.0004325615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0712959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42315573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8795554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006218116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050813816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810376421","doi":"10.7202/1045920ar","title":"LA COPROPRIÉTÉ DIVISE DU CODE CIVIL DU QUÉBEC DEPUIS LE 1 JANVIER 1994","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01761644105646872,"score_gpt":0.2456391896521657,"score_spread":0.22802274859569696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810376421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34749258,0.010177821,0.0036428745,0.1557923,0.0032594441,0.001222225,0.0002254866,0.00013659055,0.47805068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96613157,0.0019559315,0.0005380224,0.0005351206,0.0014998087,0.00009845584,0.000014262898,0.00004642102,0.029180417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755967,0.0005276453,0.00046270544,0.00054028176,0.00030889598,0.000600809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831647,0.0005018083,0.0002266841,0.00051292276,0.00010841882,0.00033367405],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001066533,0.00028668638,0.00038730304,0.000042281634,0.001122203,0.00020085972,0.0005068693,0.00032460236,0.0031983056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000545006,0.00030570244,0.00026501846,0.00054336985,0.00064080267,0.00031971803,0.00013954322,0.0004053613,0.0018010052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011951957,0.0006759769,0.023552407,0.00007597027,0.00008103581,0.00004834153,0.0137223005,0.00016705775,0.00015182373,0.92485535,0.015959147,0.020698627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051393907,0.000029155462,0.0024706917,0.0000692291,0.00010174512,0.00003015139,0.001193682,0.0006403598,0.00009986724,0.0018188421,0.9926464,0.00038594822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14644083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28842196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97668725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042793853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013258173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810685468","doi":"10.7202/1045636ar","title":"LA LOI SUR LA CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE NATUREL : UN SIMPLE APERÇU DES MESURES DE PROTECTION ÉDICTÉES ET DE LEUR IMPACT SUR LA PRATIQUE NOTARIALE","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.019145444702021615,"score_gpt":0.30900152425422134,"score_spread":0.2898560795521997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810685468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9296884,0.0014981383,0.006145971,0.055807248,0.00021684285,0.0009837744,0.0001832874,0.00017626744,0.0053000865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899173,0.00220577,0.0026561327,0.0007731729,0.0018453787,0.00016416635,0.00006558575,0.00005535982,0.0023171338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601907,0.0021167302,0.000509482,0.00045626244,0.0002922462,0.00060619594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967639,0.0019970566,0.00036497714,0.0003186325,0.00030604767,0.0002493999],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035321456,0.00034013536,0.0003749184,0.00008268396,0.0006494073,0.00039674022,0.00034370722,0.0007513427,0.00022260184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025479319,0.00034316396,0.0002642965,0.00061978825,0.00039674158,0.0009572629,0.00009937299,0.0008462423,0.000047167036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045078786,0.0026727722,0.19134867,0.0007045484,0.00054746703,0.00010268591,0.06807467,0.025869071,0.018120246,0.54551524,0.024284843,0.12230902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007709029,0.00009619655,0.0987098,0.00012948706,0.0001365558,0.00012208795,0.00023249215,0.011769177,0.00066355075,0.0048270663,0.88213116,0.0004115309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13164744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07052377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8578463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001000086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021609117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811147922","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198795568.003.0023","title":"Criticism and Reform Proposals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Criticism; Reform Act; Uniform Commercial Code; Property (philosophy); Law; Law reform; Personal property; Security interest; Law and economics; Code (set theory); Business; Political science; Accounting; Public administration; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.036167328589568365,"score_gpt":0.2612551530985508,"score_spread":0.22508782450898243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811147922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012805185,0.000030849427,0.00004730815,0.0002402636,0.00006458885,0.00035515678,0.00009128373,0.00009517939,0.9989473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016257664,0.00031192074,0.0002522338,0.000070459835,0.00023096755,8.361259e-7,0.000006363235,0.000016390795,0.99748504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999195,0.000018521914,0.00009382439,0.00027414647,0.00021042944,0.0002080828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936235,0.000026812582,0.00008479047,0.00024004748,0.00012808944,0.00015792507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012792874,0.00014214782,0.000164835,0.000053267933,0.00071453495,0.00007054156,0.00032272143,0.00027538688,0.00015086756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005688448,0.00015180428,0.00006706832,0.000005145749,0.0007591638,0.00009581255,0.00024802148,0.00019300285,0.000004472184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008440349,0.0000033369859,5.882036e-7,0.000017553562,0.000020295518,0.000008525953,0.001231804,9.569613e-9,0.0000027073022,0.9949772,0.0014931109,0.0022364631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010922537,0.000022498116,0.0000022449956,0.000042176995,0.000055173736,9.167386e-7,0.0003949826,0.0000023326875,0.000016477692,0.01392796,0.9852373,0.00018870537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009771907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094627193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001980122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013704013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61903995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811151482","doi":"10.7202/1046103ar","title":"RÉFLEXION SUR LE « LIVING WILL » DE COMMON LAW DANS LE CONTEXTE DU DROIT CIVIL QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017815562669066542,"score_gpt":0.24811100906305358,"score_spread":0.23029544639398705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811151482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7495183,0.0014603771,0.009403303,0.08323112,0.0015804755,0.0005566388,0.00008468386,0.00018345515,0.15398167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98097485,0.00043741177,0.000357951,0.0012883405,0.0034100665,0.000035931553,0.000010261318,0.000040964183,0.013444243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979679,0.00034163913,0.0004062186,0.00044230014,0.0002188117,0.0006231577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983785,0.00047581948,0.0002303626,0.00047665788,0.00017701775,0.00026165255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010477655,0.00022113636,0.00034373623,0.000029681169,0.0021071585,0.00019613645,0.0005730369,0.00025661028,0.00028892735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018098758,0.00026698172,0.0001956789,0.000374975,0.0011260239,0.00068574905,0.00021174127,0.00027686602,0.00041893148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009653678,0.00030192875,0.0039052719,0.00004227789,0.00003294089,0.000006703951,0.03345265,0.00005976082,0.00067738973,0.9578113,0.0013866087,0.0023135375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036871055,0.0001032586,0.0082333535,0.0003032721,0.000067100256,0.000020284999,0.0025210602,0.005164428,0.00025708828,0.03468474,0.94785666,0.00042004354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72589254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8360702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065562624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084565073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811170189","doi":"10.7202/1045942ar","title":"LE LOCATEUR À LONG TERME D’UN BIEN MEUBLE DOIT-IL PUBLIER LE BAIL AFIN QUE SON TITRE DE PROPRIÉTÉ SOIT OPPOSABLE AUX TIERS ?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"College Ahuntsic; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.026853761630266197,"score_gpt":0.24258828840347926,"score_spread":0.21573452677321306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811170189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3144263,0.005557564,0.003982582,0.3668941,0.002157309,0.001925634,0.0001866427,0.00037320782,0.30449668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81823254,0.001238744,0.0014764753,0.0007832701,0.0013959038,0.00013738092,0.000033450277,0.00006629141,0.17663597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969036,0.00025145317,0.0005387925,0.0007353419,0.0003895938,0.001181242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825823,0.000103823186,0.00027451033,0.00066411635,0.00020070553,0.00049858453],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008852976,0.00034866048,0.00044254446,0.00010107614,0.0015801847,0.00057004514,0.00090616115,0.00045671963,0.0021677918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017200122,0.00038874976,0.00025893655,0.0009391953,0.00051414553,0.001122123,0.0002625686,0.00053219456,0.002156101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021859274,0.001196891,0.0054003755,0.00027805803,0.00014702874,0.000082962026,0.013013599,0.0014381834,0.0005377119,0.88924,0.043509334,0.045133945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007599171,0.000055202585,0.0015032077,0.00011168942,0.00009084864,0.000032145435,0.0014904492,0.013364694,0.000453514,0.0040018023,0.9775618,0.0005747592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03384833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0090203835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047777165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001184008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811389096","doi":"10.7202/1045321ar","title":"REGARDS CROISÉS SUR LA SAISINE DU LIQUIDATEUR SUCCESSORAL ET SUR LES DROITS DES HÉRITIERS ET DES LÉGATAIRES","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.056503914799182424,"score_gpt":0.2969585352828174,"score_spread":0.24045462048363497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811389096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256863,0.0067409957,0.0006482829,0.045010936,0.0005570165,0.00037475978,0.00028136437,0.00018095206,0.020519402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95339346,0.01805482,0.0014266435,0.0004986136,0.0010386148,0.000050204624,0.0000774146,0.00006622346,0.025393996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682504,0.000760609,0.0005701607,0.0006230886,0.00043289832,0.00078817667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976418,0.00077237986,0.0002549634,0.0004588867,0.00051629514,0.00035568207],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013923543,0.00038823567,0.000508225,0.000092271664,0.0017238242,0.00033633944,0.0007161476,0.00037214515,0.0003269225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011859869,0.00041776372,0.00028552028,0.00076840044,0.0022496425,0.0014580277,0.0002808985,0.00050377595,0.00016146297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001013051,0.0008745203,0.14165972,0.00044290558,0.00014882935,0.00028766415,0.034783185,0.0011374393,0.00029160024,0.78679985,0.022725081,0.0107479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008220847,0.00012170728,0.1515645,0.0004285537,0.000106301646,0.00017745838,0.00079822907,0.00074363383,0.00017841117,0.0071746847,0.8371951,0.00068934174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11988562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06909758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032693052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059909606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811512832","doi":"10.7202/1046150ar","title":"LE CONTRACTANT DE BONNE FOI ET LA CAUSE ILLÉGALE : RÉFLEXIONS SUR LE MUTISME DU LÉGISLATEUR","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.025409712018227726,"score_gpt":0.2855526171290658,"score_spread":0.2601429051108381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811512832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48687702,0.0011059622,0.003296348,0.3830021,0.001558312,0.0006606186,0.0002725513,0.0001811741,0.12304591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97916365,0.001037203,0.0009104142,0.0016106438,0.002384638,0.000053404285,0.00002157625,0.000044836677,0.014773659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772793,0.0004620896,0.00042315456,0.0004659329,0.0002213958,0.0006995017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822235,0.00053894566,0.00022387474,0.00046973975,0.00022185205,0.0003232412],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001222388,0.00023790158,0.00034056592,0.00004679273,0.0014267922,0.000302713,0.00047510228,0.00032491068,0.00032948575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043959593,0.000270282,0.00019886208,0.00044308178,0.0009369114,0.0005161453,0.00017689451,0.0003811734,0.0006621549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015996131,0.00046242986,0.0014824827,0.000024372443,0.000060855113,0.00004303935,0.012464039,0.00005921854,0.0009447498,0.9785482,0.004181164,0.0017134463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007265502,0.00007114493,0.008336101,0.000085805674,0.00009514174,0.00006262233,0.00063590554,0.0026558982,0.000176245,0.015557333,0.97124296,0.00035426876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060352974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002000024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019019333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28736825","doi":"10.1002/chem.201702218","title":"Limitation Periods and the Symbiosis of Capacity and Discoverability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Plaintiff; Statute; Doctrine; Law; Statutory law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.014182239939746379,"score_gpt":0.2646675389644787,"score_spread":0.2504852990247323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28736825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99025804,0.0009198191,0.00096330885,0.003757478,0.000016821814,0.000104782266,0.000001243847,0.0000035256792,0.003974995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961849,0.0034857967,0.000059064594,0.000030623432,0.000029888297,0.0000034918487,1.3780124e-7,0.0000020343748,0.00020410598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991246,0.00021972935,0.0001089483,0.0000680381,0.00011448214,0.0003642218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967283,0.000120273755,0.00007238923,0.000056712197,0.00004380887,0.0000339738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025848977,0.000036940382,0.00007159581,0.0000113973865,0.0005441734,0.00005191475,0.0000625733,0.000025429355,0.0000056681392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027378794,0.000024117347,0.000030393037,0.00007832543,0.00043061902,0.000118615244,0.000008429473,0.0003185985,4.93249e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005612555,0.000011514572,0.008192761,0.000001509792,0.000011762423,8.804556e-9,0.0033045923,6.7243803e-7,0.000059558384,0.98704034,0.000002664981,0.0013690192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055208494,0.000041676238,0.012464467,0.000004511137,0.000030475414,0.000014035172,0.017779995,0.000020265543,0.00007243532,0.9629423,0.006014737,0.00006300899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007592177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00392705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024098014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116787865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047861933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4185397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883193349","doi":"10.29173/alr2486","title":"The Presumption Against Interference with Vested Rights: Creating Structure out of the Confusion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Statutory interpretation; Statute; Statutory law; Underpinning; Law and economics; Confusion; Jurisprudence; Ambiguity; Harm; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Burden of proof; Enforcement; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.02221082809669976,"score_gpt":0.3130965508887331,"score_spread":0.29088572279203334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883193349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11285192,0.008887168,0.000076052485,0.021435307,0.00040382528,0.0026544363,0.000018198116,0.00004103323,0.8536321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944207,0.0030136227,0.00003754892,0.0010322225,0.000101339516,0.00001846022,0.0000027979747,0.000004063967,0.0013692506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992532,0.00015782632,0.000184789,0.0001204404,0.00016473753,0.00011899498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991022,0.0002088239,0.0001860632,0.00033959182,0.00013138258,0.00003198471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022289841,0.00006591892,0.00011019098,0.0000026768953,0.0010541169,0.000045314864,0.00039341542,0.000031120693,0.00007740377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012539796,0.000027748449,0.00003870319,0.00013638956,0.00057755894,0.000083648665,0.000062474865,0.0000846126,0.000017921231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047782496,0.000011549942,0.00032500018,0.00010932491,0.000016170108,3.8783202e-8,0.002453612,3.0751698e-7,0.00030685373,0.9877128,0.0007459756,0.008313571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049084076,0.000018303828,0.00052376284,0.001552397,0.000033606317,2.3544841e-7,0.000036612284,0.000013799433,0.00022330353,0.00092546374,0.99656856,0.00005489688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009065525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1843277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99582255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017254531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051140847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883889275","doi":"10.71781/2494","title":"Les mailles de la fiducie en contexte de dissolution de l'union matrimoniale : de l'application des mécanismes du C.C.Q. au soulèvement du voile fiduciaire en droit québécois","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.019283966190272697,"score_gpt":0.3457603526674308,"score_spread":0.32647638647715815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883889275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460599,0.00051490817,0.0107723605,0.0025111611,0.00015738395,0.001395578,0.00018361432,0.000017916733,0.038387217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732921,0.0016066688,0.0072851335,0.00004617349,0.00080978003,0.0007032632,0.00054301816,0.0000612608,0.0156526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996216,0.0012086828,0.0005543686,0.00074401265,0.00037983755,0.00089712563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975213,0.0006161205,0.00074388087,0.0005856663,0.00016433859,0.0003687247],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043488108,0.00042673253,0.00044982313,0.00008268838,0.0039608898,0.00091616943,0.0017605141,0.00077287015,0.0006134674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000556874,0.00048366826,0.00023500697,0.00020378943,0.0006792423,0.00057141465,0.00021388097,0.0004517218,0.00023071698],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007559766,0.0004894647,0.054512598,0.00011291021,0.00012445095,0.00000982801,0.17398013,0.00024108696,0.009614522,0.034144837,0.00039217528,0.7263024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065622845,0.00009699429,0.3748213,0.00046796803,0.00039775588,0.000021499012,0.040848367,0.0022523475,0.007884748,0.008495413,0.56327856,0.0007788003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58976513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5328895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7255236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041048825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041510244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885507078","doi":"10.5040/9781509915217.ch-016","title":"Vindicatory Damages for Violation of Constitutional Rights: A Comparative Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0928765589383807,"score_gpt":0.3254005974540145,"score_spread":0.2325240385156338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885507078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011588821,0.00004559568,0.006805945,0.00019150622,0.0001671933,0.0008761842,0.00040126033,0.00008144631,0.991315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3549604,0.0000047018693,0.007523223,0.00020341775,0.0020707308,0.00025091032,0.0007693237,0.000028572153,0.6341887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985649,0.00003935141,0.0003740204,0.00035475806,0.00045888644,0.00020809124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983689,0.00023188986,0.0004895556,0.00026058947,0.00052871846,0.000120302975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083345233,0.00017413191,0.00030435846,0.00014823179,0.0008460134,0.00046834024,0.00047326047,0.00036402396,0.00025423642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006929341,0.00016516975,0.00015608857,0.000024766772,0.0022318782,0.0005444858,0.00007910675,0.00027571665,0.000029485776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083171135,0.000015394859,0.0000049655996,0.000021392476,0.000046605914,1.0795215e-7,0.003890372,0.0000012540997,0.000017396675,0.95719844,0.03862502,0.00017074979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016379739,0.00001774329,0.000013465303,0.00006402327,0.00004404919,4.1165328e-7,0.00023032376,0.000038231552,0.000048564852,0.09577405,0.9034334,0.00017195051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004421034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045903484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8648084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013353946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076549454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82234484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888692749","doi":"","title":"Explaining the Principled Exception to Privity of Contract","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Management; Contract management; Exclusion clause","score_opus":0.13549006378629563,"score_gpt":0.3836514996750749,"score_spread":0.24816143588877926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888692749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874548,0.000012557762,0.0068517383,0.0010747685,0.00012515982,0.0005277587,0.000011132033,0.00009194224,0.003850158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996456,0.000015417558,0.0000662142,0.00026435035,0.00015676701,0.0000015744948,0.000003642211,0.000013360181,0.0030226489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983214,0.00023650334,0.0002449431,0.00029840606,0.00046169964,0.00043700472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986197,0.00031019887,0.00020564187,0.00040345587,0.00019500476,0.0002660414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020338043,0.00013806784,0.00018364222,0.00018093693,0.00074850867,0.00012730491,0.00080688327,0.00013058298,0.0000389772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016174841,0.0001283678,0.00010540397,0.00067615526,0.0002119772,0.00077591225,0.00023260165,0.00031813918,0.00010436817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068784895,0.0000780338,0.9728668,0.000010074349,0.00002134413,0.000014545863,0.0072956537,0.000018404819,0.0024731306,0.014891415,5.4197443e-7,0.002261292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030703255,0.000041395364,0.95992494,0.00004376244,0.000027816377,0.000001434926,0.0021054382,1.16398745e-7,0.001575723,0.00013300739,0.035678998,0.00016031125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011477843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026498975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035678454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022731947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013918418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888969776","doi":"","title":"Shield or Shackles: The Pitfalls of Stronger Dispute Resolution Provisions in Insurance Legislation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Legislation; Dispute mechanism; Economic Justice; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Law and economics; Process (computing); Insurance policy; Law; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics","score_opus":0.04221115337208796,"score_gpt":0.3127467879829412,"score_spread":0.2705356346108532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888969776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798913,0.00010789317,0.00058850023,0.002128013,0.00006638293,0.00029303756,0.000005735747,0.000019023899,0.016900128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98514026,0.00029015707,0.000119686476,0.0000014337386,0.00009913412,0.0000013557194,0.0000010186168,0.0000035386588,0.014343427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985492,0.0005046504,0.00011380477,0.00017835764,0.00044105735,0.00021292774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987511,0.00069648196,0.00009979102,0.00016373175,0.00021488355,0.00007400228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012179865,0.000047154237,0.00009901721,0.00009151582,0.0010298812,0.000029844163,0.00026684467,0.000079030215,0.00004321679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033783301,0.00003365896,0.000030859537,0.00039368504,0.0006505162,0.00029987306,0.0001061153,0.0002825618,0.0000050743897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001290174,0.0005656007,0.59897614,0.00014340895,0.000097613934,0.000030180907,0.1392224,0.00031993113,0.048755124,0.17327641,0.0021052465,0.035217807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010526706,0.0005078789,0.580197,0.00037463574,0.000011550118,0.0000013278361,0.03657115,0.00038358453,0.00024528892,0.0016767029,0.37878683,0.0001913911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052608815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036558397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3766816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009212061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022175057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7952914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889277361","doi":"","title":"Joint Vicarious Liability in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Supreme court; Joint and several liability; Law; Joint (building); Political science; Liability; Contributory negligence; Business; Tort; Engineering","score_opus":0.07389868760942742,"score_gpt":0.3064658331882723,"score_spread":0.2325671455788449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889277361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870185,0.000022414572,0.00005676692,0.0033945688,0.000071844326,0.00032116426,0.00003072151,0.000027794804,0.0090561975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963956,0.000009014101,0.000013208568,0.00019519746,0.00006985603,0.00000152528,0.0000067400733,0.0000074556838,0.0033014172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982617,0.00036125755,0.00023480372,0.00026327648,0.0005192832,0.0003596723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991058,0.00014360993,0.00013424447,0.00039741487,0.00012814935,0.000090785165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083547406,0.000119715216,0.00018041668,0.00009449944,0.00038993842,0.00009508792,0.0007957462,0.00009589889,0.000024388748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053263426,0.00011152575,0.000070815455,0.0005755847,0.00022633873,0.0004022649,0.000114793795,0.00031691245,0.000008828466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008980457,0.000091706715,0.98927397,0.000010804238,0.000005740108,0.00002837876,0.0012472003,0.000058611633,0.0001178426,0.009100656,0.000008585795,0.000047531455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023517603,0.0000130695435,0.949554,0.000019419489,0.000015305466,9.964227e-7,0.0017296135,2.2494258e-7,0.00020610036,0.0007489565,0.047349922,0.00012717498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21015204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98540455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7752525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044944216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007858767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7951076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889400010","doi":"","title":"“An Unconscionable Thing for the One to Do Towards the Other:” The Doctrine of Fraudulent Concealment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Plaintiff; Unconscionability; Cause of action; Law; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Political science; Common law; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.15340271677365055,"score_gpt":0.384241553108885,"score_spread":0.23083883633523447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889400010","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007419167,0.047783773,0.00023173697,0.9177654,0.00016962968,0.004016202,0.00009336798,0.000015211216,0.029182762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433976,0.009353596,0.00015920075,0.043560244,0.0005479079,0.0007411243,0.0000038044611,0.000017185988,0.0022193622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988018,0.0002638862,0.00021146012,0.000125245,0.0003181758,0.00027941517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985621,0.00024451874,0.00009751669,0.00065507623,0.00017954657,0.00026127032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045251874,0.00007985753,0.00015054067,0.000010901135,0.0012834138,0.00010364749,0.0012131768,0.000025854572,0.0001984563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028529938,0.00003200093,0.00008147013,0.00028183174,0.00025281013,0.000050267845,0.00004292451,0.00011824439,0.000053687236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001989157,0.000009317897,0.00002243535,0.00003775648,0.0000258424,9.145935e-8,0.0078298,0.00007456276,0.000002172693,0.93144256,0.027438778,0.03311467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055130713,0.00001977758,0.00011747561,0.00014271635,0.00005709659,3.8239727e-7,0.0020363024,0.000026286198,0.000008054526,0.0033454564,0.99413717,0.000054174547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5265017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6834238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96669835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002503268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013665708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98711115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889979920","doi":"","title":"Recent procedural developements in the british House of Commons","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0504972135876854,"score_gpt":0.3313197504871752,"score_spread":0.2808225368994898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889979920","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25314716,0.2685028,0.00002955942,0.21639727,0.00039222167,0.007926167,0.00024208346,0.00008288697,0.2532799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7458734,0.20765273,0.00027172227,0.04557905,0.000097728545,0.00012236625,0.000038851238,0.000016966858,0.00034716603],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990754,0.00008038285,0.00026973136,0.00010508097,0.00017587506,0.00029349411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995335,0.000038133086,0.00006158036,0.00014599001,0.00004266244,0.0001781318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011912602,0.00005271058,0.0001224169,0.000025080119,0.00035420674,0.000050398077,0.00036183663,0.000023286555,0.0002820986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005745825,0.000049072856,0.00003167449,0.00049361214,0.00009661186,0.00007360694,0.000012816079,0.000090087895,0.000030300314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015270547,0.00008487669,0.041392516,0.00029350218,0.000018117722,0.00004164602,0.0027954085,3.7624247e-7,0.0000020002383,0.00647191,0.28948298,0.6594151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055713874,0.0000047298345,0.019652005,0.00048720776,0.000010305005,0.0000026074304,0.0012568077,1.3162901e-7,0.0000017090379,0.000086709675,0.9783807,0.000061378676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6906404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99383634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6888977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028527912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006134605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31141964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890602623","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2018.1509498","title":"Assumed jurisdiction in Canada: identifying and interpreting presumptive connecting factors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction; Business; Project commissioning; Political science; Law; Public relations; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02887300920327236,"score_gpt":0.3275674387100743,"score_spread":0.298694429506802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890602623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764038,0.000023668403,0.0008289146,0.0018354694,0.00070341735,0.000055882916,0.0000052787627,0.000005402267,0.020138169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900085,0.000026605052,0.00045194078,0.00011385096,0.00033995142,8.8093725e-7,8.8735356e-7,0.0000046483988,0.000060407667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990954,0.00006036387,0.0003224248,0.00008334173,0.00032174287,0.00011675222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918187,0.00017769927,0.00032087122,0.00003746723,0.00021668561,0.0000654172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005204341,0.00005196122,0.0000928329,0.000066588014,0.00020509431,0.00009135824,0.00021513742,0.000028021892,0.00008071362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030511158,0.000047617876,0.000027450853,0.00007679339,0.00008376569,0.00041153794,0.00006356581,0.00016890641,0.0000014427309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000719759,0.0000519856,0.25731975,0.000009057704,0.00013628161,0.000020648837,0.024650417,0.00006158179,0.0040261494,0.70817107,0.0002868731,0.0051942216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014332882,0.00012218757,0.36867106,0.00073746947,0.00005010138,0.000041887928,0.026372096,0.002049461,0.011793552,0.028469425,0.5597715,0.00048799592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50754017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8383648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6797016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000623257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024397898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49573916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891016535","doi":"","title":"Lock-Ups, Squeeze-Outs, and Canadian Takeover Bid Law: A Curious Interplay of Public and Private Interests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lock (firearm); Business; Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.01932801093397525,"score_gpt":0.28377992968871857,"score_spread":0.26445191875474333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891016535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5066416,0.00047299065,0.00008382327,0.009351036,0.00021338042,0.00022776116,0.00015473962,0.00002894478,0.48282573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988875,0.00007856876,0.00015444167,0.0003455383,0.00016993243,0.000003003721,0.0000023871735,0.000009606464,0.0003490361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990386,0.000077017045,0.00024464796,0.00013851869,0.00017826226,0.00032297763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992894,0.000037812744,0.00012570427,0.0000994199,0.0000906699,0.00035697295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039748088,0.00009018329,0.00013408478,0.00006902375,0.0017788553,0.00021462483,0.00018510516,0.0000740373,0.00011045193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000249553,0.000079408244,0.000039153947,0.000117005955,0.000367511,0.00029579172,0.000057890993,0.00020963237,0.000008270118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027271535,0.000022363121,0.0021180464,0.0000044980843,0.000011852272,0.00000975508,0.00030933908,0.0000014979148,0.00008537882,0.9951735,0.00041474914,0.0018462918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022286756,0.000025340492,0.0030907763,0.00002590131,0.000010065479,0.0000459636,0.00018394759,0.000015504687,0.00012100648,0.0067828028,0.9893733,0.00010252184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5115847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96683455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98895854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012563591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049657265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892429910","doi":"","title":"CANADA V PEIGAN:: HAS THE FEDERAL COURT GIVEN IN TO TEMPTATION?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Original jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Political science; Appeal; High Court; Court of equity; Court of record","score_opus":0.05167844187224907,"score_gpt":0.32099670258496793,"score_spread":0.26931826071271886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892429910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019336588,0.0029234977,0.000004029006,0.92951673,0.00009940994,0.0008813569,0.000038510676,0.0000069287426,0.06459588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445811,0.00089287554,0.000022092536,0.050677903,0.0002677606,0.00008249686,0.0000039041906,0.0000063536504,0.003465506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991748,0.00014072993,0.0001329474,0.00010385046,0.00018324943,0.0002644716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993487,0.00005598285,0.000031130847,0.00024129843,0.00008091669,0.00024197644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007352212,0.00005562616,0.00009246201,0.00001399092,0.0016184965,0.00010669055,0.00048038192,0.000018287388,0.0005684857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016447406,0.000034151068,0.00002301445,0.0003449285,0.00017567744,0.000036363675,0.000018441873,0.00009364833,0.00033325623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.4898997e-7,0.000002643825,0.00054254406,0.00002495195,0.0000057556676,0.0000024043065,0.0031603365,0.000003047239,6.837806e-7,0.13597292,0.85332423,0.006960041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001833857,0.000003416806,0.005080423,0.000106497915,0.000005533442,5.402607e-7,0.0002942588,0.0000050008416,5.4366836e-7,0.00028959554,0.994142,0.000053856595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99913824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94264746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000582531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055321315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892672175","doi":"","title":"Ordinary Wrongs as Constitutional Rights: The Public Law Model of Torts in South Asia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Private law; Doctrine; Public law; Political science; Supreme court; Comparative law; Common law; Municipal law; Jurisdiction; Civil law (Civil law); Chinese law; Liability","score_opus":0.015386797452949366,"score_gpt":0.2748195397780427,"score_spread":0.25943274232509334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892672175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7279884,0.0007362506,0.0028235114,0.009957945,0.00015625714,0.00039016167,0.000008603249,0.000023298779,0.2579156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969201,0.00013313544,0.000055345758,0.000108722554,0.00011607777,0.0000074046666,0.0000016564193,0.0000038625067,0.002653674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829185,0.000087700486,0.00021756305,0.0001224725,0.00034787596,0.0009325554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995339,0.00004452357,0.00013246399,0.00013422844,0.000090699796,0.00006417202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015879556,0.00007140912,0.000109164685,0.00004513126,0.0005064823,0.00006374833,0.00038515375,0.000063862586,0.00011597747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023345965,0.000049390113,0.00007776138,0.00020662924,0.0005097244,0.00029941965,0.000038316502,0.00080466515,0.00007194192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007185761,0.000038366852,0.0009426931,8.2406405e-7,0.000017095794,3.6739922e-7,0.0008283768,0.00032704853,0.000048755588,0.99755746,0.000030753414,0.00020108136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003424784,0.00005169379,0.000087676075,0.000010268407,0.000010382955,0.000030256602,0.005056247,0.00070902443,0.000017081791,0.9273771,0.066204175,0.00010359333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012310398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010183018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26893172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005252737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004623038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82010716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893064907","doi":"10.1017/cls.2018.16","title":"Law’s Financialization: Litigation Finance and Multilayer Access to Justice in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financialization; Redress; Liberalization; Economic Justice; Political science; Financial crisis; Financial services; Economics; Political economy; Finance; Market economy; Law; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.024668540347798494,"score_gpt":0.29771929753932863,"score_spread":0.27305075719153016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893064907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564086,0.00024470716,0.00019730326,0.0151363,0.0006116039,0.00026484075,0.00009055854,0.000004264274,0.027041825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877331,0.00018261153,0.00034392704,0.010853731,0.00048746425,0.000008160887,0.0000033015217,0.000011021086,0.0003766319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989206,0.0000553269,0.00030221193,0.0001816731,0.00009507882,0.00044506203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984739,0.00010301553,0.00015125524,0.0001063323,0.00035110107,0.000814433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057061063,0.00010201122,0.00020458935,0.00003389521,0.00089609687,0.0001737774,0.0002492886,0.00009253211,0.000037235488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001360883,0.00012041377,0.000046998925,0.0002793332,0.00034587755,0.00041634546,0.00002209684,0.00019658486,7.5159767e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024293345,0.0000036950094,0.0012296895,0.00002599452,0.000010104825,0.000018692135,0.038176294,0.00006007045,0.000007106168,0.9562812,0.002752585,0.0014321543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045288092,0.000052572075,0.019583713,0.00016680254,0.00004660589,0.00002197585,0.016871538,0.00030284247,0.000027376756,0.009109569,0.95305324,0.00031088782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99312425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95030063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001433383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049004583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8693202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893395284","doi":"","title":"THE SOURCE, NATURE, AND CONTENT OF THE CROWN’S UNDERLYING TITLE TO ABORIGINAL TITLE LANDS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Crown (dentistry); State (computer science); Common law; Medicine","score_opus":0.05059879568264792,"score_gpt":0.37163687395719963,"score_spread":0.3210380782745517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893395284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012874376,0.00002889246,0.00009101221,0.0018373325,0.000068209985,0.000030729258,7.432358e-7,0.0000047284416,0.98506397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88361275,0.0000066144394,0.000037696504,0.0001529187,0.00005270581,7.6543563e-7,3.6282408e-8,7.068389e-7,0.11613579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999042,0.0000034583388,0.000014507634,0.00001788822,0.000034246554,0.00002567703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999262,0.000011093609,0.000005125787,0.000034888904,0.0000139280655,0.000008735456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004454685,0.000007581022,0.000009256201,0.0000018124178,0.00011730538,0.000011642816,0.00004526537,0.000010174211,0.00024932987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000060609086,0.0000036194394,0.000005080115,0.000028027316,0.000047848294,0.000004409031,0.00000804962,0.000018674267,0.00014199714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7549963e-7,0.0000019745216,0.00053518964,3.942565e-7,0.0000016410496,6.1846777e-9,0.00033820485,3.912e-8,0.00007925485,0.9415949,0.053300295,0.0041476428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006869652,0.0000015419245,0.0022677493,7.620434e-7,6.5450126e-7,2.435134e-8,0.00016663033,0.000004017383,0.000060243416,0.0004283673,0.9970565,0.0000066313128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024480777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051796803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9437562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003289675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015723526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27299872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895796153","doi":"10.29173/alr2502","title":"Apples to Oranges? Gendered Damages in Personal Injury Litigation: A Focus on Infant Claims","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Tort; Personal injury; Law; Discounting; Wrongful death; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.03807729595906227,"score_gpt":0.3579791923026672,"score_spread":0.31990189634360494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895796153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083276585,0.0099102035,0.000044059852,0.1893254,0.00022260708,0.0032316523,0.00005384209,0.000088325694,0.71384734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833193,0.0045549064,0.00019618493,0.009705179,0.0003923914,0.00026417655,0.0000108025215,0.000012234296,0.0015448203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988206,0.00014071658,0.0002446424,0.000277576,0.00025069597,0.0002657677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992849,0.00016807459,0.00006660746,0.00025215792,0.00007401287,0.00015422616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044836377,0.000111674795,0.00021824412,0.000027781862,0.00033400737,0.00006258006,0.0002754878,0.0000581973,0.0007265786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014281223,0.00009602782,0.00006803155,0.00048372787,0.00020008287,0.00012462688,0.000055889934,0.000106563755,0.0009403059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005164919,0.000044979748,0.00038544947,0.00010335487,0.0000075094526,6.800501e-7,0.0035289167,8.538315e-8,0.00003296056,0.9742005,0.007398798,0.014291621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070327165,0.000052164276,0.0009084876,0.0007192839,0.000013419128,4.5122923e-7,0.00013261558,0.000002775662,0.00007257653,0.0019748078,0.9959108,0.0001422553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029654562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13850856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98851204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068765716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103421226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896167223","doi":"","title":"CONFUSION IN MATERIAL CONTRIBUTION","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Causation; Confusion; Economic Justice; Political science; Underpinning; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01913521227157854,"score_gpt":0.3034768577057742,"score_spread":0.28434164543419566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896167223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033756565,0.011263294,0.00005103168,0.6121358,0.00052190374,0.0025779773,0.00007742913,0.000058118898,0.33955786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891172,0.005165639,0.0000061649034,0.0051244227,0.00014212182,0.000029479586,0.000011853752,0.0000025639822,0.0004005697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994264,0.00018237262,0.000095685835,0.000061332124,0.00007392488,0.00016026612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996812,0.00002408676,0.000026455913,0.00012177756,0.000031380383,0.00011514469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011057497,0.000031466894,0.00007884072,0.000012451879,0.0003595067,0.000035570683,0.00016223158,0.00002682042,0.00070968457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018017688,0.00002243607,0.000019665813,0.00011596812,0.00006548041,0.00003015515,0.000008525462,0.00004982467,0.00028043042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.713307e-7,0.0000014606335,0.00008873971,0.000018457047,5.666591e-7,2.3172126e-7,0.000125464,2.1972997e-7,0.000008623938,0.986614,0.0042738016,0.008868187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031358944,0.00000198636,0.0013943407,0.00014113924,0.0000044513363,2.241959e-7,0.00001000313,0.0000061636256,0.000003858379,0.0015876795,0.9967859,0.000032920507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48772144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9056668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99251205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015956485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002454015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7770548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896191210","doi":"10.4337/9781786431271.00036","title":"The structure of remedial law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Tort; Law; Scope (computer science); Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Public law; Private law; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.021527688196784522,"score_gpt":0.262387924564984,"score_spread":0.24086023636819948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896191210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000071813,0.000111064895,0.000010593834,0.0026737486,0.0013469897,0.00045655994,0.00008151376,0.00008032476,0.9951674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12413163,0.000039562237,0.00013771982,0.00043425825,0.0023841714,0.0000035004023,0.000040653278,0.000052763273,0.87277573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980922,0.000051410174,0.0003662424,0.00031121366,0.0008424687,0.0003364925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981738,0.0003565773,0.0004125695,0.000629011,0.0002997436,0.00012834411],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006787512,0.00020107534,0.00027309806,0.00004722169,0.00085194537,0.001203985,0.0012551688,0.0005448174,0.00019442884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002306205,0.00015108092,0.00019111132,0.00002322606,0.00070082885,0.00032040256,0.00023476011,0.0008491667,0.000049639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004813904,0.0000015398555,0.0000046113137,0.000007998467,0.000033727432,5.242096e-7,0.0013501132,6.568934e-7,0.00004400525,0.97211766,0.020738848,0.005695482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007384131,0.000009506669,0.000006272917,0.000039899933,0.000024058387,3.8881544e-7,0.00011795825,8.969743e-7,0.000057221514,0.1434987,0.85602087,0.00015037128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020685862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031694382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.835282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011813787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007671164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896809647","doi":"10.4000/books.putc.624","title":"Les patrimoines affectés en droit québécois : fiducie et droit des successions","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.046414043023377496,"score_gpt":0.3252597219216673,"score_spread":0.2788456788982898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896809647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026693018,0.001235151,0.0022131102,0.008681439,0.00045145975,0.0010509157,0.00015830212,0.00026766813,0.95924896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4747542,0.0028786669,0.0021506108,0.00038204427,0.0006831192,0.00011584013,0.000051059556,0.0000674356,0.518917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969551,0.00018667738,0.0006497863,0.0008461394,0.0006292437,0.0007330796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972539,0.0009079984,0.00036526343,0.00067075127,0.00030163155,0.0005004783],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066971127,0.0005931725,0.0006170992,0.00014062205,0.0017826722,0.00030128018,0.0010165502,0.0008327652,0.03217569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016011237,0.00053697894,0.0005174188,0.00022589088,0.0015812606,0.0005682521,0.00038057374,0.00075653486,0.0047307243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002308819,0.00008447171,0.0005975576,0.00006119614,0.00006733958,0.0000039894094,0.0022428692,0.000008102538,0.00006338706,0.9134983,0.0014666931,0.081903815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014424318,0.00006417508,0.002861409,0.00022724216,0.00013770445,0.000004702121,0.0011642596,0.00006687321,0.00003930682,0.15275887,0.84185714,0.00067404675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39797238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29812342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84039044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004908377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060043734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897181213","doi":"","title":"Rights-Threats, Wrongs and Injustices: The Common Law’s Causes of Action","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Damages; Political science; Action (physics); Common law; Meaning (existential); Cause of action; Private law; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Psychology; Plaintiff","score_opus":0.04071145379166113,"score_gpt":0.36532299753079456,"score_spread":0.3246115437391334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897181213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440708,0.001851163,0.00030008255,0.010498451,0.00015923231,0.00018330835,0.0000039649067,0.000018165301,0.042914808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933664,0.004639884,0.000013051305,0.000039723054,0.00028670498,0.0000035053645,3.5567209e-7,0.000003851221,0.0016465142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989976,0.0000672335,0.00012254876,0.00007714899,0.000177061,0.00055838964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994115,0.000060082602,0.00023836871,0.00018726064,0.000055936296,0.00004685212],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011453263,0.000053171367,0.000083458945,0.000013607267,0.003254605,0.00019120167,0.00036662054,0.000043879252,0.000014758325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027948663,0.00003416766,0.00003724485,0.000030828556,0.0004381071,0.00030941557,0.000040613988,0.0005398497,0.000004798144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006525585,0.000015586122,0.0011452273,0.0000017874729,0.000023956287,1.7128147e-7,0.0008874443,0.0000011120429,0.000085092455,0.9898237,0.00003106065,0.007978311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021885612,0.00007178578,0.004756741,0.000014615958,0.00007043011,0.000021086093,0.006261195,0.0000138878795,0.00023252133,0.8927851,0.09547001,0.000083784995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023867048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.278487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25461996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016899781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045823332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898484665","doi":"","title":"Good Faith as An Organizing Principle in Contract Law: Bhasin v Hrynew – Two Steps Forward & One Look","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Duty; Doctrine; Supreme court; Political science; Faith; Fair dealing; Good faith; Bad faith; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04119949123924443,"score_gpt":0.34038703641733986,"score_spread":0.2991875451780954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898484665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07049897,0.031368926,0.00006917447,0.4045759,0.00021412017,0.0052198004,0.0001727407,0.00017464024,0.4877057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98154515,0.007402373,0.0000901857,0.00819516,0.00018664572,0.00004531317,0.000005176205,0.00002193038,0.002508067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984368,0.0002985264,0.00027928702,0.00024616334,0.00023990677,0.00049930427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986898,0.00011118233,0.000098848875,0.0004815313,0.00008117273,0.0005374894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015144829,0.000120500634,0.00025957692,0.00003309362,0.0006396246,0.00010291723,0.0006179582,0.00005698284,0.0013021968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023987229,0.000077263554,0.000059779482,0.00032018725,0.00019765245,0.0002658045,0.000035035213,0.00014894325,0.0009367649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.723362e-7,0.000016071532,0.00041999883,0.000037443388,0.000008507568,0.0000044307335,0.0006201712,1.8885076e-7,0.000034543333,0.9801772,0.0003377914,0.018342743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001982154,0.000015114062,0.0013626495,0.0007362733,0.000031316882,0.0000024740957,0.00010118418,0.0000011942508,0.000021989452,0.004245193,0.993133,0.00015135894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64696395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006190398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014395398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898677318","doi":"","title":"REORGANIZATION: A COMMERCIAL CONCEPT JURIDICIALLY DEFINED","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statute; Law; Political science; Statutory interpretation; Common law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.03076101241153468,"score_gpt":0.31739299367690466,"score_spread":0.28663198126537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898677318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019305087,0.0218358,0.00003398641,0.72152776,0.0000895255,0.0007235387,0.000020141564,0.000048378388,0.25552782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87588966,0.018772203,0.00011495477,0.10165716,0.00068968587,0.000018551345,0.000026575663,0.00001084152,0.0028203425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992417,0.00013452556,0.00014765393,0.00009898723,0.00015040307,0.0002267317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993485,0.000031510095,0.000049417482,0.00022890726,0.00009295024,0.00024872282],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047196975,0.00006160504,0.00012316449,0.00001534741,0.0012078627,0.00006457835,0.00038399833,0.000038421273,0.0010652038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022229321,0.000047297348,0.00004447917,0.00041199007,0.00012983037,0.000054568896,0.000008385641,0.00009778137,0.00040760255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7507517e-7,0.0000031812203,0.00002059389,0.0000064632177,0.0000019530382,9.871887e-7,0.0006460225,3.0960933e-7,7.3307206e-7,0.8941079,0.08107264,0.02413906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032090207,0.000006332934,0.0019325975,0.00010086853,0.000022190112,9.0437624e-7,0.00002737084,6.1759914e-7,0.0000013870115,0.002748494,0.99505967,0.0000675072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12926897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68991834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.913987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018528913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013756516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899225986","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3175444","title":"A Fiduciary Duty of Care for Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of care; Duty; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008288983912550243,"score_gpt":0.28884140867802494,"score_spread":0.2805524247654747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899225986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88949895,0.005289341,0.010354466,0.018264737,0.00088685483,0.00088626024,0.00010126664,0.000035812383,0.0746823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730587,0.00029933456,0.00010462668,0.00008355186,0.00072966376,0.0000060163648,0.0000017768537,0.00000492692,0.0014642044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987972,0.000026633761,0.00011624994,0.000069931506,0.00016624642,0.00082373276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952585,0.00003678492,0.0000819803,0.00007056254,0.00023086915,0.000053969343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053201575,0.00003921411,0.000072279545,0.000015744572,0.0006120035,0.000014513857,0.00020684334,0.000028198847,0.000028476403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066701046,0.000035409077,0.000046160243,0.00009727907,0.000079842655,0.000053240397,0.000011491009,0.00023578662,0.0000018119147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016496846,0.00001287299,0.00079458865,0.0000052857354,0.00003066136,1.368892e-7,0.0027980162,0.0000020700065,0.000090979374,0.97986686,0.0015139426,0.014868058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028992677,0.00019956958,0.0004904821,0.000010510757,0.000024240057,0.0000064061283,0.04468153,0.000012263181,0.00038086608,0.12895441,0.8248387,0.00011111298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5249725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85091245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008582016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014045531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899657898","doi":"","title":"Groia: Four Strikes and You're Not Out","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Tribunal; Scrutiny; Duty; Context (archaeology); Misconduct; High Court; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.03156044426434221,"score_gpt":0.3159695401710803,"score_spread":0.28440909590673813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899657898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86738896,0.0014514873,0.0069662556,0.034778897,0.00046994636,0.0003022875,0.0000090659005,0.000102847196,0.08853027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869868,0.0020966583,0.00007213359,0.00020437548,0.0015273247,0.0000032432015,4.781012e-7,0.000008333923,0.009100651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998229,0.00006285344,0.00013533873,0.00013498179,0.00023129856,0.0012065159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995799,0.00003464993,0.00008180973,0.00009243645,0.00009518788,0.0001160169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012855371,0.00007246463,0.0000866048,0.000035987945,0.0011054791,0.00013420598,0.00022949933,0.000062645,0.000085830645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007792603,0.000062609586,0.000045178003,0.00010717822,0.00021856,0.00019066647,0.00003531629,0.00066621223,0.00008414775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009986472,0.000017628954,0.0014109783,8.407656e-7,0.00002783489,6.910777e-7,0.0022197505,2.399523e-7,0.00017410377,0.9762152,0.00047385806,0.019448902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050671125,0.00026384502,0.002644007,0.000010942316,0.00004039979,0.000053751395,0.01486595,0.000040526073,0.00016097171,0.43583125,0.5453423,0.0002393264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068063464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028878853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54486847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030053628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001256496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899711185","doi":"","title":"THE CURIOUS HISTORY OF INTERJURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITY AND ITS (LACK OF) APPLICATION TO FEDERAL LEGISLATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Doctrine; Law; Jurisdiction; Confusion; Political science; Federal jurisdiction; Psychology","score_opus":0.06791176723274683,"score_gpt":0.3410161437907523,"score_spread":0.27310437655800546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899711185","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032306682,0.53620994,0.00029338614,0.2005647,0.00057942077,0.0050555663,0.00007539042,0.000035624922,0.2248793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98839635,0.009182727,0.000015099243,0.0009376044,0.00008394341,0.00007525566,0.00000375535,0.0000034411262,0.0013018337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994529,0.000117490956,0.0001506838,0.000046865163,0.00010730263,0.00012475124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947584,0.00006526703,0.00008997595,0.00015399647,0.000081988335,0.00013295274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094142655,0.000037319158,0.00007789702,0.000014944265,0.0004123656,0.000008737915,0.0001837328,0.000021249913,0.000045278462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009203627,0.000025088664,0.000028439234,0.00009660297,0.00012082431,0.000070384536,0.000019030264,0.00006587058,0.00002760898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014866029,0.000009393035,0.0004249678,0.00007722215,0.000009770399,1.2945677e-8,0.004985358,0.000001168821,0.00005377035,0.94370437,0.01271936,0.038013138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001432564,0.0000035724609,0.004830843,0.00005857161,0.000011106152,3.6931974e-7,0.000058936937,0.000008940215,0.000003999756,0.00036493776,0.9946154,0.0000290028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11287517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28989932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98189604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033519926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041457702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89303225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900012942","doi":"","title":"ON THE MEASURE OF DAMAGES IN SOLICITOR’S NEGLIGENCE CASES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Causation; Plaintiff; Appeal; Law; Contributory negligence; Context (archaeology); Punitive damages; Duty; Trilogy; Supreme court; Tort; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; History","score_opus":0.09468283474353169,"score_gpt":0.35206536308866804,"score_spread":0.25738252834513636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900012942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051748954,0.18016307,0.0000042431075,0.4288514,0.00026954565,0.002406835,0.000070363574,0.00002404178,0.33646154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853705,0.010169712,0.000003870082,0.003996618,0.00009971941,0.00003584546,5.7720666e-7,0.0000034534155,0.00031969708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925965,0.00021996144,0.00010923695,0.000050804676,0.0001430643,0.00021728953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993342,0.00020480414,0.000044141234,0.00025042426,0.000032416996,0.00013400022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012347783,0.000044536027,0.00009032257,0.00001520246,0.00035763695,0.000014432513,0.00035349617,0.000021931435,0.00033106923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052286824,0.000024172914,0.00003580812,0.0002513553,0.00014241683,0.000045913774,0.000011484778,0.000095899,0.000110377034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9635587e-7,0.000005934538,0.0005001971,0.0000331895,0.0000024631931,4.575987e-7,0.0014230005,8.4466893e-7,0.0000027189344,0.98060393,0.01140981,0.006017241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000986597,0.0000031416553,0.0033043816,0.00042317313,0.000010816678,6.786002e-7,0.00027229058,6.8992506e-7,0.000009871928,0.0006655293,0.99525523,0.000044319695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4895836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8284157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105934065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003517368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5138153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900435752","doi":"10.1177/0269758018805567","title":"Making sense of the victim’s role in clemency decision making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Victimology","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Normative; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Process (computing); Democracy; Law; Political science; Poison control; Common sense; Sociology; Law and economics; Criminology; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.032708343319008404,"score_gpt":0.4240235957114091,"score_spread":0.39131525239240067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900435752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38489193,0.005481551,0.0022734476,0.020339807,0.0016655868,0.0009654203,0.000034819215,0.000027827917,0.5843196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956887,0.0017407878,0.0013716489,0.000979106,0.00013788437,0.000013279285,7.5218617e-7,0.0000039435477,0.000063939544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989649,0.00012821073,0.000394326,0.00012448199,0.00027697295,0.000111117566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990528,0.00022601367,0.00027693904,0.0001719071,0.00025907552,0.000013228469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007337332,0.000050692608,0.00014193928,0.000052555944,0.000082604405,0.000005589857,0.00040939506,0.000043092627,0.00086479454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074229407,0.000038604518,0.000079494945,0.00026103045,0.00021840062,0.0000650837,0.00014814331,0.00008147135,0.000024047655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043196218,0.00019975731,0.051715843,0.00024955263,0.00004855506,0.0000033361455,0.00494464,0.000017789314,0.00087897916,0.7904957,0.0017434696,0.14965917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028357623,0.0000611102,0.09178474,0.0068817376,0.000029660736,0.00001526914,0.000826142,0.0003508542,0.0003104485,0.04418538,0.8551156,0.00015547544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037023556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001358086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85337216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007259637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009737842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9468894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900472879","doi":"","title":"Being Specific About Specific Performance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Conveyancing; Property (philosophy); Business; Real property; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.016589812246572383,"score_gpt":0.2306612683809784,"score_spread":0.214071456134406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900472879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6971275,0.000054595203,0.0010640797,0.0013209637,0.00033043275,0.0002513092,0.000119976015,0.00009722159,0.29963386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90847856,0.00061445334,0.00046653382,0.00011122831,0.000687883,0.000001080898,0.000010566889,0.000012269005,0.08961743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859744,0.00007952356,0.00012476319,0.0003819475,0.00036733676,0.00044900333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991919,0.00006599526,0.000082959836,0.00036829495,0.00012624447,0.00016461783],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025032368,0.00013894256,0.00016419296,0.00013400136,0.0024869598,0.00013150965,0.00062713976,0.00009939159,0.00087125384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000094425895,0.00016345982,0.0001124892,0.00091906433,0.00070394645,0.001611081,0.00018499838,0.00016924052,0.001131968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082435436,0.00008764491,0.0047628963,0.000007901453,0.000018410092,0.000024431469,0.00445474,0.000006340284,0.0003185481,0.9646003,0.023294838,0.0023414912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003905428,0.000042150506,0.02960863,0.000022657445,0.000010737686,0.0000015130419,0.006007017,0.000095229974,0.00014503633,0.00054830546,0.9628913,0.00023688946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005049891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011380692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.964052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032284026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018507255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900583480","doi":"10.5465/ambpp.2012.11940abstract","title":"Antecedents and Consequences of Trust as an Emergent Group Property","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Diversity (politics); Group conflict; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; Homogeneous; Trustworthiness; Sociology","score_opus":0.04843096348530606,"score_gpt":0.34217963948126784,"score_spread":0.29374867599596177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900583480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90760595,0.00014475889,0.000008166526,0.0029486073,0.00002727079,0.0004482942,0.0000023678901,0.000030463376,0.08878412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959301,0.0010911903,0.00064710446,0.00018857651,0.0000769428,0.00003896568,7.165511e-7,0.000005960128,0.0020204682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990322,0.000011554032,0.00022668079,0.00016228689,0.00032969125,0.00023759202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963075,0.0000078368585,0.00016766033,0.00003383428,0.000033010194,0.00012691483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071804936,0.00007782295,0.000121054974,0.00006051526,0.00018877294,0.000023536653,0.00028448302,0.00006326985,0.00008306963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023656072,0.00005839978,0.00002653424,0.00020565378,0.0004033791,0.0006837723,0.00012213655,0.000074734045,0.000007205386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013054027,0.00014693479,0.033417933,0.0001449427,0.000036938636,5.7797443e-8,0.005652939,8.6840764e-8,0.0041872216,0.9464525,0.00088848703,0.009058884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058363844,0.00015254976,0.16753042,0.00013859368,0.00016393,0.0000019472213,0.039919507,0.000023554885,0.010819842,0.018264132,0.7620117,0.00039019878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004693758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046610435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9281884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018206294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000062763565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2381474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900788814","doi":"","title":"TOWARDS A SINGULAR CONCEPT OF LEGAL PERSONALITY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Argument (complex analysis); Corporation; Natural person; Legal person; Legal certainty; Personality; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03880785455980722,"score_gpt":0.3242590011372247,"score_spread":0.2854511465774175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900788814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030173429,0.032111276,0.000119310644,0.29769582,0.000109268134,0.00082604395,0.000051398114,0.000027481727,0.66604203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900839,0.0017688774,0.00008820182,0.006380281,0.00015181501,0.000014506167,0.0000037666578,0.0000047168096,0.0015039884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925655,0.00020595746,0.00012383531,0.00008304732,0.00015940398,0.00017118524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994262,0.00003248178,0.00005345178,0.00022191564,0.00007175753,0.00019422833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010833746,0.000045855773,0.00013462134,0.000009095894,0.00041995777,0.000026967053,0.00031419206,0.00002535455,0.00073937414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026360844,0.000032654698,0.000073063406,0.00015464639,0.00028682733,0.00003869253,0.000012247246,0.00007327942,0.00006230993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.836175e-8,0.0000020981684,0.000027747259,0.000054598306,0.0000037967009,1.8828594e-7,0.0007109454,2.3704091e-7,0.0000011194438,0.9702806,0.005537638,0.023380956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002048957,0.0000037299271,0.00053679023,0.00013881017,0.000020299693,4.7307253e-7,0.000056074747,0.0000062473505,0.000004833682,0.0011284293,0.9980397,0.000044086424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6836304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6472168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011194087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008265106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80956286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900996121","doi":"","title":"Why Does Lord Denning's Lead Balloon Intrigue Us Still? The Prospects of Finding a Unifying Principle for Duress, Undue Influence and Unconscionability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Adjudication; Freedom of contract; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Proposition; Common law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.021890438594362807,"score_gpt":0.30390265571095515,"score_spread":0.28201221711659236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900996121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987244,0.00016018104,0.000736917,0.009144297,0.00011332374,0.0010641462,0.000057368416,0.000066881374,0.001412866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734557,0.00006904609,0.00096785824,0.00041818124,0.00017951043,0.00017719474,0.0000016213622,0.0000125326715,0.0008285102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985515,0.00011382867,0.00030806861,0.0003615629,0.00030124493,0.00036382984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983917,0.00067566,0.0002018162,0.00036357302,0.00021997477,0.00014728215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010346203,0.00013554806,0.00019241849,0.000028526254,0.0008561286,0.0001397859,0.00042690244,0.000107240965,0.000051680418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012363008,0.00007284277,0.00006915937,0.00024267645,0.0008563666,0.00043885945,0.00016176092,0.00015013422,0.0000071817813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003633572,0.000055298944,0.11589543,0.00007746138,0.000024652303,0.0000010008533,0.0012700688,0.000033800225,0.005341667,0.8759674,0.00026411118,0.0010328081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010420431,0.000081605176,0.06138621,0.0002931863,0.000053172353,0.000002278093,0.0009709442,0.0000527496,0.007576289,0.07529012,0.85285014,0.0004012647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007723308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039823007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85258603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014848712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023023452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901021339","doi":"","title":"DE LA RENONCIATION A UNE FIDUCIE PERSONNELLE","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Renunciation; Beneficiary; Trust law; Deed; Express trust; Property (philosophy); Institution; Law and economics; Testamentary trust; Law; Political science; Punitive damages; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04660194896805139,"score_gpt":0.3065957183954511,"score_spread":0.2599937694273997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901021339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022167507,0.30012906,0.000009522738,0.40128773,0.00009378954,0.0003092886,0.000027017775,0.000010276633,0.29791164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33200964,0.46340254,0.00015351201,0.025898948,0.0008421848,0.0000844071,0.000007497809,0.000023350172,0.17757791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986778,0.0004847026,0.00016034125,0.00014444017,0.0001498094,0.00038294104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911124,0.000121607845,0.000075418575,0.00028077347,0.000045343695,0.00036562065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012431472,0.00009252017,0.00014368385,0.000017351373,0.0011376436,0.00010016121,0.00035826972,0.000092637085,0.007770338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019530438,0.00007679022,0.00010288096,0.000624929,0.0003679389,0.00007875629,0.000014662892,0.00021532843,0.0027693787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.3649645e-8,0.000011326108,0.00002929506,0.00017582861,0.00001018715,0.000003964994,0.0048273797,0.000003826581,6.5186396e-7,0.6537142,0.25396025,0.087263025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032707943,0.0000053583426,0.00021829638,0.0005856542,0.00007950778,0.0000075374833,0.0001915752,0.00023078856,3.206571e-7,0.0018993927,0.9966502,0.00009867061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59178704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61654866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7426899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007563003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049323944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901983828","doi":"10.7202/1053848ar","title":"The Daunting Enterprise of the Law – Essays in Honour of Harry W. Arthurs, Edited by Simon Archer, Daniel Drache, and Peer Zumbansen, Montreal/Toronto: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 386 pages. ISBN: 978-0-7735-4890-9","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Queen (butterfly); Art history; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01632773223434718,"score_gpt":0.24712478155545806,"score_spread":0.23079704932111086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901983828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4833025,0.0013737663,0.00026808432,0.040533114,0.00037269914,0.0016750172,0.0007957646,0.000104054794,0.471575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98517275,0.00080686156,0.000058005262,0.000029945091,0.00010002979,0.0000053035683,0.000011139214,0.000009062223,0.013806879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869376,0.00028793266,0.00027926976,0.00020392737,0.00031243404,0.00022265648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865806,0.00049162516,0.0002701456,0.00030733284,0.00019608803,0.00007673748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006522477,0.000107233325,0.00013449905,0.000021324387,0.0012952876,0.000038233404,0.0003796122,0.00023186144,0.000023466777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039482,0.0000827536,0.0000567019,0.0002896342,0.0009577532,0.00028028915,0.00016157275,0.00036869655,0.0000013192001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000810754,0.0005431442,0.055371437,0.00001271373,0.00016714138,0.0000023391513,0.026825396,0.00025001203,0.00095663406,0.68232375,0.22125375,0.012212589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038975742,0.000018474058,0.015547213,0.00006329387,0.000048279784,2.5359475e-7,0.017101634,0.00039613157,0.00074878114,0.0006919004,0.9648615,0.00013274148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059807066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021546438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74360776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012183866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015114946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902547779","doi":"10.54648/erpl2018042","title":"Policy, Politics and Aesthetics in Non-American Private Law: A Comparative Study of Contract Performance Interruption","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Law and economics; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.038513491688415676,"score_gpt":0.35140605228986455,"score_spread":0.3128925606014489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902547779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89056945,0.0009305749,0.00036043703,0.0015191043,0.00011917594,0.0020974295,0.00005032454,0.00011895363,0.10423453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98532325,0.010038522,0.00246443,0.0012655604,0.00043129068,0.000037322043,0.000025483652,0.00011636262,0.0002977891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932603,0.0023022324,0.0019516528,0.0008989881,0.0005963502,0.0009904507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958986,0.00029323564,0.0015149534,0.0013695324,0.00049791153,0.00042576445],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036344987,0.00055747194,0.0013387647,0.00027575326,0.00047997443,0.00010630994,0.0016596513,0.000091371745,0.000039069673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006187946,0.00057591894,0.00020083127,0.0016500878,0.002260817,0.00046708324,0.0009369795,0.0008010178,0.00009834331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008290699,0.0015027677,0.008773596,0.0019910038,0.0001274894,0.000046539226,0.020433642,0.000017459444,0.0024943107,0.95354724,0.000093980474,0.010889062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003955349,0.0047310027,0.13980785,0.011604644,0.0004795473,0.00009833999,0.0026316834,0.0007616979,0.0037865988,0.0011871182,0.82894975,0.0020064283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014986941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005293838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95236015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008073639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001827751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902813703","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v11n4p139","title":"The Third-Party Revocation Action System: Status Quo, Theoretical Controversy and Improvement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Civil procedure; Action (physics); Lawsuit; Law; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Third party; Political science; Status quo; Interlocutory; Business; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Appeal","score_opus":0.016635407988140276,"score_gpt":0.3231819574141499,"score_spread":0.3065465494260096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902813703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80676,0.0006233224,0.0015613531,0.030747287,0.0008822249,0.00039951465,0.000022884446,0.000022002103,0.15898138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998394,0.0003752818,0.00006881764,0.00026877422,0.00064691895,0.0000014418047,1.9625864e-7,0.0000023962543,0.00024213878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994126,0.00005385545,0.00017137881,0.00004694129,0.00015933276,0.00015588931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993552,0.00013647035,0.00013506264,0.000057746776,0.00018824056,0.00012728346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006277184,0.0000358863,0.000066410634,0.000009657857,0.0007805279,0.00014737368,0.000053356063,0.00003199678,0.0000064464184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006913441,0.000021954003,0.000021830618,0.000027861135,0.0006665058,0.00009431485,0.000016967419,0.0000779674,0.0000015769309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067630363,0.000007900157,0.000052223586,0.0000052658756,0.000009113216,1.8093668e-7,0.0008224632,7.2775194e-8,0.0002074419,0.9976934,0.000364448,0.00083073054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037876406,0.00020979461,0.0012974878,0.000028113249,0.000055513086,0.000008325913,0.012123357,0.00019109546,0.00044711886,0.09594021,0.88925487,0.00006537454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001007252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066735374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9017532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073891824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080928585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60032684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903015180","doi":"","title":"WHAT IS THE ROLE OF MISFEASANCE IN A PUBLIC OFFICE IN MODERN CANADIAN TORT LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Law; Estate; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.031296463108715734,"score_gpt":0.29419223446006504,"score_spread":0.2628957713513493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903015180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033809524,0.08530628,2.929255e-7,0.56862295,0.00018920048,0.0017894789,0.00006494946,0.000010729087,0.31020662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753874,0.010968116,0.000008191717,0.013064599,0.00004964567,0.000068008696,0.0000025076706,0.0000066932953,0.00044481928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903977,0.00012083604,0.0001913071,0.00013205464,0.00014884729,0.0003671821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999058,0.00005346265,0.000051339546,0.00042963141,0.000060280287,0.00034729994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012064538,0.000068050846,0.00014176051,0.00004266469,0.0003749351,0.00011385866,0.00073869654,0.000058616642,0.000389017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009885337,0.000046620953,0.000046181158,0.0004723464,0.0002450509,0.00020455997,0.000016500979,0.00026702136,0.00006296013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.1274052e-7,0.00000503338,0.0009437949,0.000027480788,0.0000027699803,0.0000010961891,0.0028778648,7.8006207e-7,0.0000064010637,0.9646757,0.0010771165,0.030381711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023649369,0.0000011269436,0.0020771108,0.00017860536,0.000004708666,6.111217e-7,0.0004896034,0.00002878982,0.0000023731866,0.0044714683,0.99266225,0.000059692346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99435884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99158514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025732515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025609215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45429647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903548177","doi":"","title":"THE TORT OF CONVERSION AND THE COLLECTING BANK: TEVA CANADA LTD V BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tort; Law; Vicarious liability; Supreme court; Nova scotia; Statutory law; Common law; Political science; Unjust enrichment; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.021087773566045444,"score_gpt":0.2733911320622001,"score_spread":0.25230335849615465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903548177","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05933187,0.099944375,0.0000119339975,0.52948076,0.0005808034,0.0036913569,0.00008377499,0.000015623593,0.3068595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906044,0.0063222316,0.0000071563813,0.0020343685,0.000051724073,0.000005521025,9.0290393e-7,0.0000040313703,0.0009696341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991188,0.0002642048,0.00018938804,0.000076192846,0.00018186783,0.0001695434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989222,0.00047645852,0.00013041381,0.00026085236,0.00010055802,0.000109461085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021184452,0.000052271847,0.00015679795,0.000008104492,0.00092386827,0.000024439172,0.00037930114,0.000020414427,0.0001330641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005278268,0.000025787933,0.00003923772,0.00023660687,0.0004529668,0.000021236398,0.000028184046,0.000084243846,0.000005551606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053594517,0.0000040064674,0.002527309,0.000470297,0.000045042758,4.2663874e-7,0.0018825998,0.0000034583816,0.000008748758,0.8671954,0.11218482,0.015672514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007728782,0.000003485405,0.0013114897,0.00019439014,0.000036830283,6.5737265e-7,0.00028127906,0.000020612122,0.000009883125,0.00024011423,0.99778587,0.000038108414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93127257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001428951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018022525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7105741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904269756","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850397.003.0017","title":"Freedom of Testation and Family Claims in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Estate; Law; Statutory law; Obligation; Common law; Discretion; Political science; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Freedom of contract; Public law; Geography","score_opus":0.028757429299509796,"score_gpt":0.25118493123459334,"score_spread":0.22242750193508354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904269756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008810644,0.00007707399,0.000027583805,0.0019999663,0.000030378573,0.00015328689,0.000044156284,0.000006939665,0.99677956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8122681,0.0004596838,0.00053375156,0.0005165878,0.000119775024,0.0000075456696,0.00002259339,0.000013346288,0.18605866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995312,0.0000054861216,0.0001363584,0.000107890635,0.00015978473,0.000059264814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999739,0.00005932628,0.000061753824,0.00005594338,0.000031703457,0.000052286076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005092662,0.000049799277,0.00010459381,0.00001731383,0.000043562002,0.000009227844,0.00007811783,0.00005359075,0.000098860066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008887676,0.00005081266,0.000012474919,0.00002488782,0.00006758638,0.000026428794,0.00002295305,0.00008570029,0.000004208434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.3103107e-7,0.0000010153111,0.00017968118,0.000005749238,0.0000024876313,9.0412163e-7,0.00031444346,0.0000034068566,0.000010057001,0.99489456,0.0015870804,0.0029999895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009891353,0.000009736199,0.00529365,0.000028978728,0.000009983938,6.995041e-8,0.001311995,0.000098229844,0.0000027785436,0.06282283,0.9301769,0.00014594058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9806741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93207175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012834567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011687893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20733821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904580877","doi":"","title":"Letting Agents: Servants of Two Masters?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Business; Principal (computer security); Servant; Law and economics; Fallacy; Property (philosophy); Law; Economics; Computer security; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02679810766988826,"score_gpt":0.3481945065756684,"score_spread":0.32139639890578015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904580877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9206342,0.0002903169,0.006538408,0.004311618,0.00020999927,0.00012416886,0.0000021619437,0.000027922031,0.06786118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995298,0.0003635359,0.00020443834,0.00016564199,0.0008551832,0.0000015093979,4.009733e-7,0.0000070136603,0.0031042262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983316,0.00007547354,0.00017938006,0.00009159399,0.00023746703,0.0010844864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995419,0.000023855635,0.00015263248,0.00009451072,0.00012171982,0.00006540314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015370522,0.00005330651,0.00008086173,0.00003594236,0.000557017,0.00004076517,0.00029445087,0.000029467832,0.00015443422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053102227,0.000048395188,0.000056243072,0.00018439307,0.00014765769,0.00017779741,0.000032104854,0.00043132482,0.00006663468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074346112,0.00002737568,0.0040001078,0.0000017698716,0.000043222277,4.2402206e-7,0.003212656,0.0000029588693,0.0009705595,0.97202635,0.00024908374,0.019458044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012189987,0.00032874386,0.0020773355,0.000058183396,0.000062316256,0.00004698033,0.03107923,0.00020182868,0.0011310198,0.64681137,0.31665352,0.0003304741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010490082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084511135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.325215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000304355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010764386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47159198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905008473","doi":"","title":"OVERVIEW OF THE LAW OF BIDDING AND TENDERING","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Call for bids; Bidding; Mistake; Procurement; Business; Supreme court; Duty; Construction contract; Law and economics; Law; Contract management; Economics; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.09645502507909347,"score_gpt":0.34618132060989354,"score_spread":0.24972629553080006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905008473","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019261075,0.39403042,0.000009199957,0.27906293,0.00010916723,0.0015821559,0.000050092,0.000016129588,0.30587882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96352565,0.03445189,0.000028657732,0.0018752853,0.00001792665,0.000005673293,1.8302849e-7,0.0000025247075,0.00009218997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996444,0.000042214273,0.00009937983,0.000044320164,0.00008043042,0.00008924151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996849,0.000018226388,0.000051946223,0.0001581943,0.00002299841,0.00006376077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040115297,0.000028213693,0.00008650965,0.000005710589,0.00031039506,0.000008714069,0.00020368582,0.000013385452,0.000047122172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004491573,0.000015969028,0.000037078775,0.0001614973,0.00020534509,0.000026449095,0.000021813097,0.000043246928,0.0000039817396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.5541226e-8,8.815445e-7,0.000033620054,0.00016591903,0.0000024136223,5.2294027e-8,0.00042242435,0.0000014490258,0.0000061553264,0.99672383,0.00005542321,0.002587809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026093086,0.000001749927,0.0012131046,0.0012273397,0.00002404195,7.2716676e-7,0.00011164981,5.083769e-7,0.000026544278,0.006146204,0.99119055,0.00003146749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4687234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77411026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057966616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027404763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5348144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905149855","doi":"","title":"INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS AND IRREPARABLE HARM IN THE FEDERAL COURTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Harm; Plaintiff; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Political science; High Court; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03042409735497193,"score_gpt":0.3312179239207884,"score_spread":0.3007938265658165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905149855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049906507,0.020523774,0.000003802954,0.5572954,0.0004169476,0.0017071624,0.000022172293,0.00003186965,0.37009236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976817,0.0065351264,0.000020652331,0.013836299,0.00014848229,0.000095578886,0.0000022855686,0.0000045508204,0.002540012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943554,0.00011626904,0.00009707823,0.00008584918,0.00009029005,0.00017499781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955475,0.000058372163,0.000025689444,0.00021250946,0.000024341487,0.00012432755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011181077,0.000045746285,0.00007337019,0.000017297492,0.000988145,0.000114811875,0.0002831707,0.000028918697,0.000357126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010541268,0.000027078513,0.000026289557,0.00013882229,0.00020043306,0.00006182142,0.000012824825,0.0002471572,0.00009837088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.7054605e-7,0.000009511089,0.00067007303,0.000044674936,0.0000049880655,0.0000023194893,0.00453389,3.734879e-7,0.000004887541,0.90084296,0.080464736,0.013421196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019583917,0.000002275738,0.0025259904,0.000056759844,0.000008113528,0.0000031531017,0.00027126947,0.0000037557218,1.9004172e-7,0.001829051,0.99524033,0.00003953716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4438764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9683876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9269105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000608564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041552944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76001126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905397250","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i1.1655","title":"UNDUE INFLUENCE: TOWARDS A UNIFYING CONCEPT OF UNCONSCIONABLITY?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Law; Legislature; Commonwealth; Political science; Parliament; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03659715602216373,"score_gpt":0.3503688528253154,"score_spread":0.31377169680315165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905397250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85429054,0.00019730642,0.0010349608,0.0074611627,0.00025558352,0.00011830383,0.0000063203333,0.00003308046,0.13660274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798745,0.000018794526,0.00051621516,0.0004200969,0.00067495165,0.0000020049217,2.4864596e-7,0.0000047776207,0.0003754503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999038,0.0001533919,0.00020513359,0.000073531926,0.00031945077,0.00021048148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991795,0.000110453766,0.00017237576,0.00014038688,0.00030569357,0.00009161457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013105397,0.000053445034,0.00008992555,0.000022102351,0.0021639601,0.00013382766,0.0004581349,0.000044094548,0.00019060679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015958982,0.000036520614,0.000055421304,0.00025694174,0.0013119127,0.00021912159,0.00006344993,0.00023377886,0.00002461934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006178771,0.00001432526,0.00055962126,0.0000017392507,0.00001888533,0.0000016300761,0.020293983,0.00008598376,0.00057810755,0.97503424,0.00040743925,0.0029978547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048653485,0.00010299387,0.0072131166,0.00013774793,0.00005799742,0.00006327307,0.02413176,0.00010478409,0.0044423095,0.10237704,0.8606483,0.00023417268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059742257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033841373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059690716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024242386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905530015","doi":"","title":"Aboriginal Title Claims to Private Land and the Legal Relevance of Disruptive Effects","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Political science; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Jurisprudence; Law; Dilemma; Private property; Property rights; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0105404602020888,"score_gpt":0.3509990986865406,"score_spread":0.3404586384844518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905530015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34789598,0.000026944976,0.00039995337,0.006185342,0.000064871914,0.00018965313,0.0000027540043,0.000009672372,0.6452248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98852396,0.00004822416,0.00027772295,0.000063575164,0.00006062451,0.000006512649,9.112605e-8,0.0000011735209,0.01101813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982464,0.000010651426,0.000025595025,0.000042150972,0.000051927214,0.000045031276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997923,0.000055248274,0.000020836485,0.00009814267,0.000012138145,0.000021382137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010440974,0.000016538088,0.00003406555,0.0000029621474,0.00023831677,0.00004149921,0.00010433414,0.00000997485,0.000031340736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003535644,0.000009543362,0.000008802812,0.000015163441,0.00015735415,0.000041187926,0.000015365767,0.000022490623,0.00005580759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041704525,0.0000028247164,0.0011873754,0.0000019115535,0.000001750153,1.3856939e-7,0.0004907706,1.9996479e-7,0.000029863873,0.9961585,0.0006375614,0.0014849731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012142922,0.0000058799365,0.01668132,0.000004876896,0.0000032026946,7.16001e-8,0.000026905002,0.000012847182,0.00020168285,0.004814397,0.9781049,0.00002248244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001159265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055099925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99134403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004254966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000145651375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1832964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907805986","doi":"","title":"What Was That Thing You Said? The New Zealand Supreme Court's Vexing Vector Gas Decision","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Guardian; High Court; Duty; Political science; Position (finance); Quarter (Canadian coin); Majority opinion; History; Economics","score_opus":0.06791224060157657,"score_gpt":0.31864297569079436,"score_spread":0.2507307350892178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907805986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.870622,0.0004556139,0.010373329,0.041007657,0.0005323882,0.0013047038,0.00012645843,0.0001666091,0.07541124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727755,0.002545658,0.0022481186,0.00003654454,0.0002781392,1.5832305e-7,0.000020820222,0.000014007977,0.022081062],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965952,0.0007708384,0.00009926807,0.00037732968,0.0012219704,0.00093536964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710107,0.0013538883,0.00012716913,0.0005435604,0.00022413296,0.00065016653],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00218953,0.00015296733,0.00022793024,0.00031866258,0.0037134478,0.00017713213,0.0016534681,0.00011999919,0.0006617279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018226585,0.00015743508,0.00018546308,0.0008154632,0.0013151679,0.0022310885,0.0010219592,0.0006908443,0.0002058675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011037918,0.0006947503,0.053814653,0.0000618229,0.00034187554,0.00013045134,0.43957877,0.00011071392,0.0067929253,0.28942522,0.111346364,0.09659868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052294915,0.00004387876,0.019037554,0.000093263,0.000036758138,0.000002639136,0.13351208,0.00018140307,0.00005594442,0.0037808174,0.84254575,0.00018695706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02963209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015562721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7311994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003763979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047595045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99758357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910431864","doi":"10.5840/croatjphil201818332","title":"An Anscombean Reference for ‘I’?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024196081905342816,"score_gpt":0.27480805927239627,"score_spread":0.25061197736705343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910431864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9396672,0.0000040431732,0.031074772,0.0010116248,0.00009919969,0.00028137656,0.000061090366,0.00015273626,0.027647907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903738,0.000013255754,0.005877454,0.000035058292,0.00011956044,2.8796531e-12,0.00002111597,0.000004909296,0.0035548669],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906355,0.0001136312,0.00007412987,0.00028273405,0.00017326925,0.00029265994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989816,0.00010720181,0.0001326306,0.00023960031,0.00035794047,0.0001810078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023975501,0.000089789944,0.00014027538,0.000087625194,0.0014815343,0.000022700824,0.0006718848,0.00009638719,0.00018679534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001997439,0.00012250977,0.00008182729,0.00028495092,0.0005906129,0.00024066321,0.00012497487,0.00008597459,0.000034846264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014611606,0.00029852366,0.0014780388,0.000026451757,0.000059309383,0.000010248946,0.5170527,0.0000826164,0.0005770502,0.46492118,0.0039562983,0.01139145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009546776,0.0001463377,0.0037757142,0.000042309202,0.00007574754,5.3108084e-7,0.70548654,0.0044842134,0.00011851882,0.00043585408,0.28416964,0.0003099336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050701913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005918685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46448532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015511223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001718905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910883856","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0079","title":"Voicing the market: Extending the ambition of contract theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Value (mathematics); Centrality; Morality; Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Economics; Government (linguistics); Contract theory; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.008238026037929214,"score_gpt":0.23779649265686761,"score_spread":0.2295584666189384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910883856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17946772,0.00048249832,0.0013120392,0.0027661854,0.00016732975,0.000194421,0.000007428976,0.000008340543,0.815594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743176,0.00026123604,0.000079393634,0.00005215914,0.000068477326,2.7927152e-8,1.6737638e-7,0.0000016295993,0.002105164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941957,0.00019770503,0.00007148955,0.00004404108,0.00017498703,0.00009219413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940884,0.00021976477,0.00016472394,0.00009776079,0.00007816597,0.00003072181],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011454955,0.000029973678,0.000063914784,0.000004398447,0.0009589041,0.0000217229,0.00031217714,0.000025309471,0.0025770597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017672672,0.000019830948,0.000077302655,0.000021417802,0.0002431527,0.00026681297,0.000032726428,0.00009579105,0.0000048204192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035617224,0.00001951962,0.00062075275,0.0000025467334,0.000027056652,7.1312644e-7,0.010023752,0.000020861984,0.0006770519,0.9841277,0.000455491,0.003988926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062323763,0.00006042111,0.050889734,0.00008322353,0.000094576215,0.000008617755,0.13836336,0.00021734246,0.0001741579,0.010856323,0.7985106,0.00011839461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05798263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05948181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97327137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110520385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004330933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911675534","doi":"","title":"Book Review: The Use and Abuse of Unjust Enrichment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Relation (database); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026631082356505725,"score_gpt":0.29265782325839484,"score_spread":0.2660267409018891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911675534","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061934516,0.8910051,0.0009822849,0.039329626,0.000086427004,0.0005914652,0.0000037178672,0.000026110785,0.006040755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17995307,0.8098761,0.000017124321,0.0030182926,0.00011076843,0.00000552998,3.7400443e-7,0.000003799743,0.0070149614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888486,0.000091714486,0.0001596706,0.00007043845,0.0002107806,0.00058255944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995927,0.00006583414,0.000113828,0.00010619381,0.00007029845,0.00005110931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009001879,0.000048261172,0.00008554486,0.000015123652,0.00065721845,0.000021106574,0.00018425919,0.000021699794,0.000038875143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057252568,0.0000311003,0.000048622253,0.00012210663,0.00018647916,0.00022406105,0.0000150399,0.0004550539,0.000007316264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008962352,0.00010985983,0.0012401298,0.000019134628,0.00008266741,0.0000013747937,0.0058085457,0.000007249733,0.00005913874,0.84094006,0.14733994,0.004382918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008882808,0.000025618274,0.00040585102,0.00002652804,0.000020726158,0.00004564229,0.00049686385,0.0000024350081,0.0000057801685,0.0038471902,0.9949931,0.000041419484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004584841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006263466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8476532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001716043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078796793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5054859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912072546","doi":"","title":"Gordon Tullock's Critique of the Common Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018654737026704227,"score_gpt":0.26164629268463385,"score_spread":0.24299155565792963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912072546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3764832,0.0000050551585,0.00014691925,0.0019209239,0.000064836146,0.00016816286,0.00021838158,0.000053358257,0.62093914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99060345,0.00000891155,0.000024542242,0.00015194682,0.000042471132,5.0742017e-7,0.000008750722,0.000007689636,0.009151747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991824,0.00008879547,0.0001247815,0.00015681809,0.00020705778,0.0002401215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999194,0.0001163773,0.00008993276,0.0003325376,0.00016107936,0.00010602276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000102706734,0.000090997644,0.00012606758,0.000056796776,0.00088165165,0.00011356089,0.0006901195,0.000054146756,0.00004306327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002337609,0.000082620296,0.00010558818,0.00061417714,0.0013136632,0.00050468754,0.00029282572,0.00013519502,0.000040841114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016427413,0.00009736372,0.0042311703,0.0000047229896,0.000017226314,0.0000040977015,0.002488622,0.0000058350506,0.00005654619,0.9904954,0.0012064105,0.001376187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015576252,0.00004709171,0.0016237347,0.000017732566,0.000012949479,6.369835e-7,0.0022647795,0.000017576209,0.00051826006,0.010496589,0.9847199,0.00012501322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064694323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030576669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009462423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111664296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98711276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912520768","doi":"","title":"THE OPPRESSION REMEDY","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Plaintiff; CLARITY; Law; Corporation; Political science; Statutory law; Harm; Statute; Sociology; Terminology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05423227589189154,"score_gpt":0.36860260135828327,"score_spread":0.3143703254663917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912520768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019942895,0.036507793,0.0000040166647,0.45678666,0.00016583603,0.0005617373,0.000005349526,0.000018944636,0.50575024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7801979,0.1477799,0.000056936544,0.0327726,0.0016383878,0.00013395758,0.0000039169227,0.000016788135,0.03739959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935085,0.00014706135,0.00008881379,0.00007206847,0.00012930129,0.00021190285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993277,0.000061078266,0.00003397714,0.0003212072,0.000067563364,0.00018843639],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011372657,0.000036787336,0.00005295339,0.0000055022233,0.0032084733,0.00007593649,0.0005069409,0.000020924079,0.00050449674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023242453,0.000017980576,0.00003326255,0.0001651471,0.00036293291,0.000032924738,0.00002122047,0.00007428009,0.0010373534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7674108e-7,9.210406e-7,0.000019901396,0.000011103147,0.0000025983181,2.4775366e-7,0.00046085575,1.7649711e-8,0.0000016393408,0.71639746,0.22607054,0.057034526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008686999,0.0000023071893,0.00024707758,0.00014175006,0.000008272912,3.3642254e-7,0.000059227106,0.0000018205997,0.0000020784576,0.0017855709,0.9977119,0.000030961688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2591665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91586477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7799985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010188757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005258746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914737984","doi":"","title":"ENTIRE AGREEMENT CLAUSES: NEITHER RIDDLE NOR ENIGMA","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Agreement; Law; Law and economics; Res ipsa loquitur; Exclusion clause; Political science; Economics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Tort; Liability; Contract management","score_opus":0.0449347226490299,"score_gpt":0.33354256167615187,"score_spread":0.28860783902712195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914737984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001274719,0.043417983,0.000011345251,0.41352022,0.000102314676,0.0012537508,0.00003333763,0.000036513116,0.54034984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8301506,0.04973776,0.00011455935,0.08347253,0.0005510794,0.000089137546,0.000013870761,0.000014432658,0.035856012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999135,0.000114280476,0.00014636957,0.00012615527,0.00018079969,0.00029740602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992566,0.000019483085,0.00004912019,0.0003318117,0.00004483576,0.0002981244],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061801897,0.00007328101,0.00012082558,0.000016753884,0.0008364991,0.00007366309,0.0004354914,0.000032860415,0.0022042328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057907255,0.000051198364,0.00007551972,0.00022648716,0.000081346494,0.000058774338,0.000010793167,0.00009765568,0.001402437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.479962e-7,0.000013236293,0.00011991642,0.00004347897,0.000010115698,0.0000028572842,0.0011645174,6.435135e-7,0.0000032480934,0.7896523,0.10265463,0.10633473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002925742,0.000006934211,0.0012660606,0.00018184273,0.000024787307,5.5782755e-7,0.000082005914,0.0000014426793,0.000001307781,0.0012394276,0.9970913,0.00007506354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22751565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7800621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89443666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023589525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000523366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915564683","doi":"","title":"Le droit au respect de la vie privée : les défis digitaux, une perspective de droit comparé (The Right to Respect for Private Life: Digital Challenges, A Comparative Law Perspective)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Right to privacy; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.025954726031593007,"score_gpt":0.3305037714982752,"score_spread":0.3045490454666822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915564683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1541739,0.028846886,0.056918498,0.24323627,0.0005279697,0.0027645333,0.00024814947,0.00020992786,0.51307386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862705,0.003057091,0.00044243076,0.0003406963,0.0036603152,0.00012749065,0.000004766226,0.00007377789,0.006022962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930806,0.0008641392,0.00061866647,0.00081232673,0.0006561134,0.003968118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962029,0.0012877535,0.00047027407,0.00050613086,0.00086926675,0.00066368066],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044650394,0.00048527995,0.0006588334,0.00014679645,0.0041705216,0.000904996,0.0014418433,0.0002833316,0.00004168176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006138353,0.00045202838,0.0005127775,0.00096900965,0.0030867844,0.00084045494,0.00021511588,0.0024244462,0.00012913866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034515394,0.0005303443,0.000101210986,0.000009069968,0.00062662124,0.0000056244903,0.04966781,0.000066792214,0.000066790955,0.9462813,0.0006705381,0.0016287206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073403516,0.0008208099,0.0005317179,0.00006629064,0.000104049206,0.00013683915,0.07867519,0.00012948911,0.00014772985,0.6208421,0.29743612,0.00037565982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01858037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19563602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8320966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017700853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014574869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916090380","doi":"","title":"Tenant Fees Bill: Good Intentions – Weak Protections","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Landlord; Enforcement; Principal (computer security); Business; Agency (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.01851767248168436,"score_gpt":0.297810397481606,"score_spread":0.27929272499992164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916090380","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039458923,0.01611795,0.091142856,0.5462693,0.007575206,0.0019141687,0.00007624663,0.0003402609,0.2971051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7437996,0.009464976,0.000277662,0.000121501995,0.0039631147,0.000049997885,0.0000017952356,0.00002932892,0.242292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953603,0.00025359474,0.00043535177,0.00031305087,0.0005102046,0.0031274823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986917,0.0000508989,0.000276424,0.00026014794,0.0004566068,0.00026423443],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002289723,0.00020582849,0.00019502963,0.0001279561,0.0034407193,0.00023856238,0.0005580279,0.00019169952,0.0005241175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016212129,0.000137197,0.00028115223,0.0010261278,0.0009887256,0.0004990064,0.00009008376,0.0023921025,0.0010544603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000891179,0.0002505589,0.00027625053,0.000003892302,0.00014964165,5.910796e-7,0.00079833885,0.0000043235427,0.0002940937,0.94907546,0.00085377984,0.04828415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021931088,0.00048407735,0.00040170507,0.00005158341,0.00008201683,0.00019569356,0.008026186,0.000069661604,0.00005553391,0.3579653,0.63226646,0.00018251677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006405393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08401274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7043407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019298152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056287437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916203628","doi":"","title":"OBSERVATIONS SUR LA CONCEPTION JUDICIAIRE DU ROLE DE LA JUSTICE CONTRACTUELLE EN MATIERE D’HYPOTHEQUE CONVENTIONNELLE","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Legislator; Economic Justice; Creditor; Payment; Law; Business; Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Civil code; Debt; Legislation; Sociology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.021675024050635285,"score_gpt":0.28885294365165926,"score_spread":0.267177919601024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916203628","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026148455,0.11918802,0.00021984304,0.56214434,0.0011837586,0.002187965,0.00040755665,0.00008334684,0.28843668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89833033,0.07176094,0.0002773884,0.009053834,0.0010464471,0.00016572162,0.000035991554,0.000031000935,0.019298319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780804,0.0010822373,0.00032379682,0.00019644212,0.00018339379,0.00040608612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786663,0.0009766415,0.00017758788,0.00036752108,0.00017820229,0.00043341186],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026313707,0.00015512582,0.00024247705,0.000023402994,0.0015402684,0.00016059539,0.0005263849,0.00024288124,0.0038070262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009471582,0.00013798698,0.00014759049,0.00034582766,0.0008214141,0.00023629943,0.000030803785,0.00060476316,0.0007563318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.242032e-7,0.00002888459,0.00033695778,0.00028462312,0.000022232722,0.0000039289557,0.0018479112,0.000013162875,0.00004939314,0.9321578,0.04932158,0.01593296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011907216,0.0000059806357,0.0066040633,0.00062125677,0.00033293618,0.00001792266,0.000627133,0.00033648786,0.0000032941803,0.010138379,0.98103225,0.00016121399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36712196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6590728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93171066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032987495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018228102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917835795","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Government: Provenance, Promise, and Pitfalls","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law and economics; Legitimacy; Political science; Law; Obligation; Politics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.0075326107140314446,"score_gpt":0.27032730079410805,"score_spread":0.2627946900800766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917835795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6405,0.002643202,0.0025112834,0.016411535,0.00031163808,0.00066307356,0.000010287099,0.00008641988,0.33686256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831854,0.0028901834,0.00011164701,0.00016429466,0.0010150175,0.000009980305,2.9613037e-7,0.000008357421,0.012614792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982362,0.000051785682,0.0001278163,0.00013883325,0.00030553574,0.0011398726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964494,0.000021874166,0.00009278166,0.00009042248,0.00005521048,0.000094766896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012410571,0.0000670377,0.000074943244,0.000013474425,0.0008830779,0.000096814394,0.00019819997,0.000046574256,0.000046332196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006447205,0.00005778699,0.0000330195,0.00012333745,0.0002056128,0.00020819521,0.000036642967,0.0005097757,0.0000401971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009997111,0.00003136364,0.0010699215,0.0000012470808,0.000019761117,3.4873776e-7,0.0010811723,1.1081061e-7,0.00020005173,0.9743964,0.00044144588,0.0227482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034146477,0.00017539466,0.0019554673,0.0000128788915,0.000017227629,0.000028276549,0.0036759172,0.00001650474,0.000115146344,0.41584215,0.5776719,0.00014767704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025767408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004343671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57723045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053619384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013100897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67920107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918031632","doi":"10.1515/npf-2019-0003","title":"Editor’s Note for Issue 9(4)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.013598825417559217,"score_gpt":0.36484411543040507,"score_spread":0.3512452900128459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918031632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017446054,0.000056541394,0.0026685083,0.26030993,0.0067804796,0.0028567456,0.00022363776,0.0003291384,0.70932895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8400615,0.000022674676,0.0019056496,0.004354833,0.030613013,0.0002507676,0.000019831732,0.000030872623,0.12274087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989335,0.000019122617,0.00013678038,0.00020167924,0.00020877522,0.0005001673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938047,0.00009529032,0.000060555736,0.00025298595,0.0000820133,0.00012867396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025516635,0.00008408774,0.000113127186,0.000053687778,0.00041851215,0.00007250579,0.00031257136,0.00011770577,0.0002910231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001234737,0.00008052972,0.00009580969,0.00022973634,0.00007895794,0.0001677365,0.000056588295,0.00008447287,0.0018316078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067431283,0.000019514451,0.0009041296,0.000011444372,0.000005357699,4.992528e-8,0.0012621374,0.000004912365,0.00029212018,0.80613106,0.18701361,0.004348909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020866717,0.000030389143,0.00028504932,0.000004847525,0.0000041113262,1.03996165e-7,0.00061445695,0.00008895632,0.00031051552,0.011535129,0.98680556,0.000112239715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007912091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011272238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82261544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012010667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003426806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918728312","doi":"","title":"Making Dishonesty Fit the Crime","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dishonesty; Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Statutory law; Tribunal; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04813407800908747,"score_gpt":0.36773419288934645,"score_spread":0.31960011488025897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918728312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4783288,0.0022249704,0.013894971,0.07338242,0.0009373563,0.0004920672,0.0000039189945,0.00016361552,0.43057188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99082935,0.00048819074,0.000035889952,0.0003505813,0.00203416,0.0000045006277,1.8416775e-7,0.000007245908,0.0062498753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981916,0.0000904047,0.00011783087,0.00009460312,0.00023194024,0.0012736412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996098,0.00004840577,0.00007849086,0.00013010867,0.00008640475,0.00004678257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018060578,0.00005589435,0.000054580934,0.000018450286,0.00205236,0.00014919693,0.0004376651,0.00003738599,0.00014719977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008129249,0.000036614223,0.000061353196,0.00019021984,0.00025392004,0.00014023483,0.000036614714,0.00074517826,0.00019206408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034384782,0.000013364171,0.0005455903,2.362161e-7,0.000015341639,2.441835e-7,0.0017404377,7.963004e-7,0.000028697461,0.98260605,0.00041775958,0.014628054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009784854,0.000052594492,0.002750459,0.0000058459414,0.000017611634,0.000037228026,0.008246097,0.000022789514,0.000020625324,0.40404183,0.58461434,0.00009273501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049463526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010589935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58419657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038975198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014664169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918876867","doi":"","title":"ABORIGINAL TITLE: THE CHIPPEWAS OF SARNIA","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Fallacy; Appeal; Law; High Court; Surrender; Equity (law); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03568701721323528,"score_gpt":0.3321455949587789,"score_spread":0.2964585777455436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918876867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010141711,0.061642125,5.2861463e-7,0.084986754,0.00005070987,0.00016677407,0.000008317082,0.000005141895,0.85303825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4996077,0.40211287,0.000031232317,0.0054220012,0.00037424025,0.000033534376,0.0000021174762,0.000010280708,0.092406005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997187,0.000038401842,0.00005489311,0.000030406107,0.00006756398,0.00009001371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997375,0.000022982329,0.000022418186,0.00013385918,0.000018926012,0.00006433849],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025702227,0.000020194804,0.000040152896,0.0000041092503,0.0004017221,0.000014622373,0.00020445451,0.000010401996,0.0026888463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024409092,0.0000109928615,0.000023816307,0.00010843831,0.00010264716,0.000010222254,0.0000022335444,0.00004521988,0.0014375483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.5707894e-8,0.0000010476314,0.000019388342,0.000014846473,0.000002353685,1.7507733e-7,0.00020896393,4.2006732e-8,2.2641947e-7,0.75096303,0.20367889,0.04511101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004994653,8.462389e-7,0.00013413768,0.00003859087,0.0000063002376,2.2466308e-7,0.000010384838,0.000002324504,3.3229992e-7,0.0003731451,0.99941283,0.000015884596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060210265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3754927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7957339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037966645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013432022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918878418","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v8n1p30","title":"Modernising English Land Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Land law; English law; Law; Political science; Geography; Land tenure; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11226999000711509,"score_gpt":0.46180734235249965,"score_spread":0.3495373523453846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918878418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069493994,0.00001552763,0.00003911026,0.004779393,0.00029084532,0.00016941976,0.000014161595,0.000042687207,0.92515486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755262,0.000015290621,0.00012512004,0.00028464568,0.00065349246,0.000019458459,0.000009265948,0.000006854776,0.02335966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984818,0.00010141805,0.00009493223,0.0001730771,0.00090301974,0.0002457714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896216,0.00024470262,0.000017752633,0.00014389453,0.0005511343,0.00008038025],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010390272,0.00003800586,0.00004947195,0.000039267383,0.00044175624,0.00029575732,0.0004852675,0.000049894228,0.00093923934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098169294,0.00003681914,0.000033302418,0.00010995263,0.00024939122,0.00026168113,0.00013014956,0.00023151161,0.0009919071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055482374,0.000026637541,0.001111501,0.0000015646784,0.0000075303105,9.843576e-7,0.0012038714,0.000048259608,0.00015275042,0.99682695,0.00036600576,0.00024837116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110141635,0.0000072992475,0.00015596142,0.000008848733,5.297139e-7,1.8369776e-7,0.0003436351,0.00033008587,0.00014143117,0.0398742,0.9589812,0.00004648994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024861122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010432795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013490813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086857304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918984292","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198817659.003.0007","title":"The Constitution of Equity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Constitution; Economics","score_opus":0.09562566374570758,"score_gpt":0.3652651595371599,"score_spread":0.2696394957914523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918984292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.420062e-7,0.00010020385,0.00028758432,0.0074193873,0.00006731976,0.00014945319,0.000014974587,0.000025294923,0.99193525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.094798915,0.0005049863,0.000070260096,0.000179446,0.00022901401,0.0000039929787,0.0000043408336,0.00000317312,0.90420586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956036,0.000006245206,0.00011069464,0.000076573764,0.00018529836,0.000060856215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996465,0.000072434435,0.000081327016,0.00010410346,0.00005482056,0.00004084666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016820556,0.000042347136,0.00006832588,0.0000050354874,0.00038860913,0.000027867154,0.00020696405,0.0000760225,0.00036445886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003500064,0.00002805925,0.000056445977,0.000013218599,0.00060004933,0.000020498279,0.00008849023,0.00009043118,0.00015576906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.7516083e-7,9.733161e-7,6.4626875e-7,0.0000019065301,0.0000056136846,9.8541534e-8,0.000102268816,1.7003046e-7,0.0000038168037,0.99091727,0.004263598,0.004702965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011719587,0.0000028594516,0.0000019499876,0.000004549686,0.0000075535154,3.1013897e-8,0.000058580506,0.0000015855594,0.0000071744953,0.16357529,0.8362986,0.00003014108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005128727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015773422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83203495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030698386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026476826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3990569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919392835","doi":"10.7202/1056326ar","title":"Le crédit-bail et la vente à tempérament dans le Code civil du Québec","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011183005586591944,"score_gpt":0.2532275726857197,"score_spread":0.24204456709912778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919392835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46813035,0.000812367,0.00080830284,0.07159611,0.00039330506,0.0004269955,0.00010843489,0.00008340285,0.45764074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.902744,0.000508849,0.00027532302,0.00074288785,0.00049111526,0.0000720779,0.000022782608,0.000037872327,0.09510508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981684,0.00028502045,0.000329015,0.00043002414,0.00024591683,0.0005416348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998809,0.00021212596,0.0001873352,0.00048260263,0.0000638529,0.00024510664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000809341,0.0001542823,0.00028741782,0.000035762325,0.00045312438,0.00016614745,0.00055415195,0.00021230956,0.0004565384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005744002,0.00024057705,0.00022920354,0.00032119788,0.00039747712,0.00029715456,0.00015020178,0.0003608832,0.0017163105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007681659,0.00039339988,0.010084459,0.0001127418,0.00004326012,0.000018289134,0.0074982527,0.00036457618,0.0012166323,0.97358847,0.0045428877,0.0021293382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046603676,0.00005123403,0.0049290895,0.00017681025,0.00004172309,0.00002623822,0.0037359162,0.0009912705,0.00037916735,0.012147871,0.97673297,0.0003216607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14372109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21836336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9721901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051891967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001962155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919726698","doi":"10.1017/lst.2019.6","title":"Revisiting the fraud exception: a critique of United City Merchants v Royal Bank of Canada 40 years on","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Underpinning; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04464865428380113,"score_gpt":0.337203370805331,"score_spread":0.29255471652152987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919726698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510738,0.00027810546,0.000007671619,0.009916727,0.00010538023,0.00019038207,0.000023775357,0.0000103658795,0.038393736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963482,0.00008334695,0.00002143919,0.00030170882,0.00017558667,0.000010128916,0.0000010934266,0.000003368169,0.0030551048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992211,0.00009257875,0.00015657615,0.000101493475,0.00028482682,0.0001434463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993523,0.00023968844,0.00009281694,0.00012949432,0.00015984515,0.000025861322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037854363,0.000053707958,0.00014441981,0.000018005629,0.00025588577,0.000010939262,0.00016326673,0.000025517225,0.000085343796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020762948,0.000039903738,0.000036876132,0.00023169024,0.00015764483,0.00003514281,0.00006209245,0.00010362745,0.0000040956543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060256294,0.0000776448,0.026889615,0.00017917797,0.0002960499,0.00000569827,0.03562921,0.000498984,0.00048244584,0.9073044,0.01912337,0.009453112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002836998,0.00006347639,0.1504005,0.0002340821,0.00003678059,2.7503899e-7,0.031256918,0.000075672935,0.00047567222,0.0017134763,0.8152476,0.0002118547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54489386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30793574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90559095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072657334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001596048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7046926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921013079","doi":"10.3366/elr.2019.0571","title":"The Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Performance: A Scottish-Canadian Comparison","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Good faith; Honesty; Duty; Law; Fair dealing; Faith; Supreme court; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.022953268273611438,"score_gpt":0.3342424241363495,"score_spread":0.3112891558627381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921013079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32793155,0.041479874,0.0000032836003,0.0091334395,0.00052640756,0.0026360953,0.000019102035,0.000033859546,0.61823636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800567,0.017738225,0.000025557001,0.0005435334,0.00010413345,0.000055286702,0.0000037916882,0.00000509757,0.001467675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881476,0.00006832786,0.0003717568,0.00014536803,0.00027607783,0.00032371853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992244,0.00015016344,0.00014139748,0.0002728775,0.00007712956,0.00013398618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013967038,0.00007871959,0.00026777273,0.000019208674,0.00031055146,0.000042524152,0.00040217434,0.000052322426,0.0007036786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008361955,0.000056159337,0.00006394586,0.000323546,0.00017730545,0.00015048146,0.00003395503,0.00018022573,0.000089223606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028373076,0.000043221826,0.025861548,0.00017211953,0.000010444247,4.0540834e-7,0.0006932514,0.000006379238,0.000009121851,0.9588244,0.0035663997,0.010809856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010650506,0.000018470442,0.003809776,0.00062120386,0.0000099958415,2.8404054e-7,0.000106568754,0.000043429816,0.0000115064495,0.00012427442,0.99507195,0.00007604878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044198986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17464466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99150556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010645041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003757401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921566010","doi":"10.7202/1056817ar","title":"Specific Performance in the Civil Law: Mediating Between Inconsistent Principles Inherited from a Roman-Canonical Tradition via the French Astreinte and the Québec Injunction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Civil code; Debtor; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Obligation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Conscience; Unjust enrichment; Civil procedure; Order (exchange); Philosophy; History; Public law; Restitution; Business; Creditor; Debt","score_opus":0.024811971199831764,"score_gpt":0.2369441141896023,"score_spread":0.2121321429897705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921566010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.952342,0.0001520409,0.000102533726,0.009915702,0.00006902004,0.00063541974,0.000017453809,0.00002618522,0.03673969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864066,0.00012156065,0.00007763542,0.00026427512,0.0005612464,0.00011709836,0.000025933263,0.000008828538,0.00018275043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869365,0.00032298482,0.0002939642,0.00022262591,0.00024081493,0.0002259634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986252,0.0008304843,0.00014742636,0.00031934227,0.000029347544,0.000048181082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011614219,0.00008523611,0.00016656707,0.000023293502,0.0005486386,0.0001461667,0.00039857024,0.00008220942,0.000058124693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006569082,0.0000612582,0.00007055906,0.00025337984,0.00040371844,0.00016245672,0.00005935654,0.00036963585,0.00004043949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007737469,0.00014891673,0.43401402,0.000063431115,0.000093800234,0.0000043306623,0.08118768,0.00031980698,0.00049322867,0.46500036,0.00031089995,0.018286139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006735248,0.00003833742,0.9324509,0.000076811026,0.000040739145,0.000004860666,0.00358896,0.0030736162,0.0000342642,0.012040739,0.04782198,0.00015525993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054207433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099829555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4984369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020173039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013089011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9520907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921568760","doi":"","title":"JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Political science; Tort; Private law; Precedent; Common law; Charter; Public law; Liability","score_opus":0.051531622556219125,"score_gpt":0.3382382600379025,"score_spread":0.2867066374816834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921568760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00591525,0.011005396,0.0000034595982,0.25128472,0.00006747839,0.0007330526,0.000006498583,0.000020972338,0.7309632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618923,0.021688446,0.000013952235,0.014976109,0.00016611506,0.00004354156,0.0000019809368,0.000005747988,0.0012118048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993619,0.000105291976,0.00010302855,0.00008542783,0.00010385174,0.00024050768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958265,0.000026177908,0.000027752169,0.00017789738,0.000016106811,0.00016940811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061515346,0.000044219887,0.00009528221,0.000015656784,0.0005089311,0.0000354596,0.0002877658,0.000027722468,0.00051358703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055749515,0.000033155673,0.000032621894,0.00029790468,0.00013085242,0.00006178904,0.0000127004305,0.000110432244,0.00038956324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.6487645e-7,0.0000024451347,0.00012515431,0.000010407112,0.0000012870443,0.0000031474735,0.00026659897,2.835918e-7,7.2806967e-7,0.9875983,0.0021966577,0.009794823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023097515,0.0000013719313,0.001370652,0.00014485953,0.0000058364917,7.9299724e-7,0.000019929237,0.0000010979309,5.2486206e-7,0.0064458787,0.99193907,0.000046892466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75585836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98414296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022312769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037188435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56234175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921704861","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500001062","title":"L'Administration du bien d'autrui.","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Psychology; Humanities; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018188553115926837,"score_gpt":0.3172454862448181,"score_spread":0.29905693312889126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921704861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3042365,0.00072285644,0.03456714,0.38428897,0.014564671,0.000299837,0.00010181469,0.00004343314,0.26117477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884758,0.0021685404,0.00087043276,0.0013782195,0.0033837457,0.0000039226397,0.000036081627,0.0000064245523,0.003676806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997663,0.00008166215,0.000985368,0.00006703061,0.0010017611,0.00020117275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728334,0.000068581,0.0010623627,0.00009397471,0.001330311,0.00016141408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006730244,0.00012679846,0.0001515582,0.00023041663,0.00019900115,0.00062799576,0.0006166917,0.00013335256,0.0006640944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020021792,0.00012626489,0.00018665071,0.00026253905,0.00018501843,0.008641253,0.00005085001,0.00029820303,0.00045379446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019113864,0.00024055937,0.0015124194,0.000010821021,0.00016394803,0.0000675864,0.006128821,0.00087224494,0.00006459341,0.77212685,0.015416116,0.20320487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005297708,0.0001311942,0.0031204908,0.000058844947,0.000025456744,0.0007267771,0.0015324906,0.0016098041,0.000121670506,0.0019669936,0.9900506,0.00012588492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008503261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012610307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9746345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042983054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005579858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7271368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921738486","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3260911","title":"Defining Corporate Law Oppression","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02484755818108262,"score_gpt":0.31289090747280107,"score_spread":0.28804334929171843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921738486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29086864,0.0020275728,0.01238434,0.0105633885,0.00064973003,0.00024240138,0.0000045609418,0.00016435684,0.683095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994179,0.0006983404,0.00018829992,0.00025185282,0.00079946965,0.0000030921815,0.0000010953754,0.00000840446,0.0038704127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982096,0.00008463715,0.00013269238,0.00010896488,0.00021642355,0.001247713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951404,0.000028744318,0.00015721981,0.000094485105,0.000107817315,0.00009768637],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015830405,0.00005847206,0.00006727292,0.000024336847,0.0016228292,0.000110311485,0.00026112306,0.00005323575,0.00010505091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043645246,0.000050044197,0.000045221877,0.0001585371,0.00023707392,0.00020274267,0.000031871827,0.0006589461,0.00027840608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053761596,0.000012390491,0.00029330322,2.580572e-7,0.000008962334,3.2844747e-7,0.0005859505,0.0000011263504,0.0001430562,0.99300694,0.00021279078,0.0057295277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014790558,0.00007312196,0.00010953965,0.0000088886245,0.000008757504,0.000017027969,0.0025142757,0.000021660731,0.000145739,0.7121794,0.2846886,0.00008509161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011375679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016096402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7033104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034300366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015721257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921844405","doi":"","title":"THE RECEPTION OF EQUITY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (1875-2000)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Doctrine; Supreme court; Equity (law); Tort; Political science; Conscience; Good faith; Duty; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.06841189570124676,"score_gpt":0.35082082447772717,"score_spread":0.2824089287764804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921844405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01366503,0.054670766,0.0000057080647,0.43471548,0.00015803073,0.0019307279,0.000071437935,0.000007070149,0.49477574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619741,0.035456527,0.000004575947,0.001588534,0.000042267893,0.00002863261,0.0000020365246,0.000003037168,0.0009002965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998912,0.00032722836,0.00020869327,0.00006349069,0.00026586215,0.00022277313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992715,0.000169943,0.00009301281,0.00031203878,0.00006992352,0.00008356925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027221083,0.00004514492,0.00010908798,0.0000093409,0.0005434527,0.000018081315,0.00061757193,0.000021513526,0.00022991648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031791805,0.000023069524,0.000037301797,0.00036887062,0.00018282194,0.000027702337,0.000015397898,0.00010189237,0.0000070620276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001156565,0.000008693731,0.000791942,0.00009769448,0.000008470708,0.0000013461645,0.0026647185,0.000008340002,0.00000470154,0.91058946,0.05210957,0.033713885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018932153,0.0000028293325,0.0032952311,0.0001336148,0.000010928252,7.814911e-7,0.00057463936,0.0000033496776,0.0000015357439,0.001504801,0.99442315,0.000030209205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99283916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94830906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040916988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040481337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7181215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921854331","doi":"10.11575/prism/33939","title":"The Law of Embellished Credentials","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Chemistry; Political science","score_opus":0.018811043433745303,"score_gpt":0.25203225956816605,"score_spread":0.23322121613442076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921854331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19820742,0.00042495562,0.02500882,0.0033660375,0.00015277232,0.00024968246,8.2999014e-7,0.00003333162,0.7725561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99031204,0.00014840563,0.0024429597,0.000022584214,0.000025582942,1.803185e-7,0.0000010028066,0.0000021754963,0.0070450767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995069,0.00006032924,0.00006144308,0.000051517964,0.00017688161,0.00014292035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957263,0.000085558335,0.00008906544,0.00013417979,0.000047999685,0.00007058163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037606145,0.000029582085,0.00007105916,0.000012543579,0.00060929393,0.000008773895,0.00029210618,0.000042220356,0.0001689447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019088538,0.000027947415,0.000061006125,0.00009062144,0.00045843454,0.00019027684,0.00007340293,0.00004780252,0.000023608782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061578558,0.000042994336,0.0007433393,0.000003636389,0.000014194721,1.6747316e-7,0.008378656,7.624225e-8,0.00029353346,0.9768218,0.0017595887,0.011935896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117163865,0.0000070600854,0.007793074,0.000003947262,0.000025851998,8.264383e-8,0.0018954007,0.00007615993,0.0003233857,0.0027056818,0.98700076,0.0000514474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013065385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052593113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017644224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003772608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99350667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922045478","doi":"10.3968/10951","title":"Research on the Contract for the Benefit of Third Parties","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Severability; Frustration of purpose; Legitimacy; Social contract; Legislature; Contract management; Exclusion clause; Law and economics; Third person; Business; Institution; Privity of contract; Law; Economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.11674591324143908,"score_gpt":0.4051746022599651,"score_spread":0.28842868901852603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922045478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27904204,0.000042801923,0.000006063436,0.06287567,0.00019979753,0.00094195997,0.00005098878,0.00000862399,0.65683204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99655306,0.000009296183,0.0000048642805,0.0007431701,0.00019259843,0.000064013526,2.6040456e-7,0.0000025459522,0.0024301915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876595,0.000048939495,0.00008130622,0.0001360597,0.00050963514,0.00045809115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846417,0.00090063363,0.00003709039,0.0001734879,0.0002916548,0.00013293831],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003751804,0.000034754856,0.00005552549,0.00004487654,0.0037615343,0.00014904447,0.0009218756,0.000037483354,0.00012886347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031923509,0.000020610343,0.000041646334,0.00078712055,0.0020270904,0.000094861214,0.00002634342,0.00013215082,0.000058234695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014202349,0.0000029699813,0.0007136955,7.482592e-7,0.0000014298863,2.8717015e-8,0.0048705894,0.0000024227645,0.00009494306,0.99029094,0.0023169215,0.0017038806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052084222,0.00002344109,0.013055663,0.000005553499,0.0000028272473,2.8336071e-8,0.037355714,0.00009099545,0.00022178669,0.011474955,0.9376587,0.000058219965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14206526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24899809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023755376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014042605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922274671","doi":"","title":"SOME RECENT DECISIONS ON THE ELEMENTOF UNLAWFULNESS IN INTENTIONAL TORTS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Element (criminal law); Appeal; Tort; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Contributory negligence; Res ipsa loquitur; Liability; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07926216876163567,"score_gpt":0.33636609424239433,"score_spread":0.25710392548075867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922274671","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006344879,0.013808419,0.000003495825,0.90950984,0.00018048019,0.0020195148,0.000022536782,0.000013746804,0.068097085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84506917,0.088364266,0.000025810072,0.059074406,0.00037079,0.0010840067,0.000018200535,0.000014915318,0.0059784064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904627,0.0001955358,0.00018057233,0.00011095075,0.00021870663,0.00024797398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923396,0.00017332054,0.00004428776,0.00028800042,0.00007603847,0.0001844094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010591209,0.000059167043,0.000090504334,0.000025480937,0.0007172482,0.000080299804,0.00046019338,0.000024543604,0.0054439437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039726924,0.00003233045,0.00004815731,0.00029975362,0.000113113565,0.000078283716,0.000026049038,0.0001394071,0.0013190393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.09956815e-7,0.000006550042,0.000057663,0.0000047902777,0.0000026634088,3.6691034e-7,0.00014039599,7.9388064e-7,3.6121344e-7,0.9126622,0.060515422,0.026608704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020363148,0.0000025660827,0.0031527109,0.00027625507,0.000005433858,2.4572245e-7,0.00015668523,0.0000031825018,6.959804e-7,0.020048575,0.97628576,0.000047526297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29112646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7624306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91577035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003514883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050088105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923462742","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5691","title":"Rule 2.1 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure: Responding to Vexatious Litigation While Advancing Access to Justice?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Rule of law; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Law; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Political science; Resolution (logic); Procedural justice; American rule; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; History; Politics","score_opus":0.045308506931187854,"score_gpt":0.35854048593889065,"score_spread":0.3132319790077028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923462742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9063958,0.000021314043,0.0018574467,0.002058248,0.00027414926,0.0010659313,0.00005815388,0.000044937286,0.08822405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909911,0.0000058581613,0.0047485176,0.00064414245,0.000542389,0.00007953866,0.000006069832,0.000025032501,0.0029573457],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979306,0.00006804887,0.00057311,0.0003884725,0.00063620514,0.0004035986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789923,0.0002454479,0.0003751307,0.0003983258,0.0007772938,0.00030456783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074803416,0.00015759634,0.00032309646,0.00045120533,0.00033543017,0.0001567809,0.0011742644,0.0001039821,0.00046154263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011731868,0.00016836877,0.00006474513,0.0012516254,0.00015880998,0.00080984045,0.00043110322,0.00012483499,0.00008049671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019937346,0.001442278,0.049419057,0.004643884,0.00028267276,0.000008583427,0.4276819,0.0117385825,0.21638657,0.22065333,0.05150318,0.014246225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015019596,0.001272026,0.2834916,0.002923042,0.0015827295,0.0000026604082,0.015257889,0.00029767764,0.23273474,0.0068978276,0.4523559,0.0016819317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018317819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07288752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.412424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031038266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010150578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98821926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923491351","doi":"10.4324/9780429259586-12","title":"No Expropriation Without Full Compensation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Economics; Psychology; Market economy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03530270776180092,"score_gpt":0.2952961296678731,"score_spread":0.2599934219060722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923491351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040925075,0.000017895547,0.0010601839,0.00092012493,0.00028774305,0.0005697221,0.000012545662,0.00011293944,0.9969779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017123235,0.000087630346,0.0007725595,0.00021963335,0.0007070493,0.000009548668,0.000070428214,0.000020801876,0.9809891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908787,0.000014836429,0.00018312637,0.00022987311,0.00035291794,0.00013140056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992865,0.000039624265,0.00016820876,0.00023755836,0.00020680424,0.00006134277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002210168,0.00011775384,0.00014996169,0.000040701867,0.00024695304,0.000087133994,0.00018254785,0.00024427488,0.0047714678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020006964,0.00011012625,0.00007401216,0.000018052866,0.00007597487,0.00011707151,0.000037581183,0.00015515051,0.011086721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003104608,0.0000043182804,0.000019072453,0.000005511349,0.0000074150994,8.079927e-8,0.00031949827,0.0000018175774,0.00004665089,0.9956345,0.0027332546,0.0012248093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074228556,0.000014095297,0.000037051544,0.000018195642,0.000014507276,1.1438633e-7,0.00004842491,0.00006225444,0.0000037769942,0.0156188505,0.9839503,0.0001581642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069355755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017173752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013340719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025224403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99613833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W292880592","doi":"","title":"Antipodean Alignment: Impact of the Proposed Australian Consumer Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer protection; Corporation; Commission; Law; Population; Competition (biology); Legislation; Common law; Legislature; Economics; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02131163582588744,"score_gpt":0.3287517080437196,"score_spread":0.30744007221783215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W292880592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97103494,0.000024152232,0.000024020277,0.002612249,0.00034422433,0.0001923724,0.000031238345,0.000015630301,0.025721185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836075,0.000063402214,0.00014503644,0.00013571476,0.00024387875,0.0000015723577,7.526741e-7,0.000008150756,0.0010407296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.00010847637,0.00022640763,0.000094403826,0.00042834904,0.00026584597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913824,0.000051919113,0.00021109279,0.00022619007,0.00020261946,0.00016992404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007524881,0.00008331554,0.000109820256,0.000021793088,0.00091240904,0.00014367877,0.0003954469,0.000078849785,0.00045268558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004884117,0.000051236304,0.00020438338,0.00016581714,0.00058863376,0.00013436894,0.000018715798,0.00042679557,0.000031068368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004779306,0.00028899903,0.034525234,0.000008714951,0.00017554028,0.000013094458,0.016396102,0.000038752958,0.06824785,0.8589218,0.019586984,0.0017491339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065013516,0.000054280554,0.022455407,0.000029142646,0.00007436828,0.00012729484,0.0010875121,0.00002022126,0.0025421185,0.017522525,0.9552065,0.0002304622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002347688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026500444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93561953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044083205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7017605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293453096","doi":"","title":"Canadian Preference Law Reform","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Legislation; Statutory law; Preference; Discretion; Political science; Law reform; Insolvency; Nothing; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.04087800652717334,"score_gpt":0.3298105964386153,"score_spread":0.288932589911442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293453096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00733991,0.00002262069,0.00043121452,0.009584099,0.0006022687,0.000059759015,0.0000160172,0.00002381554,0.9819203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98787177,0.00003030574,0.0007332257,0.0017152587,0.0011068688,0.000001344598,0.0000057548737,0.000006162379,0.008529304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989241,0.000020845951,0.0002110628,0.00009955839,0.0004333457,0.00031109093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991508,0.00003667581,0.000084088664,0.000085255895,0.00024268687,0.0004004533],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009795257,0.00006082773,0.000056310833,0.000061368206,0.0010790774,0.00024159072,0.0005466951,0.000062313055,0.0015905005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032438755,0.000054681386,0.000052456766,0.000086819855,0.0001553321,0.0003385179,0.00002966419,0.0002710587,0.00028220448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038213716,0.000013272945,0.00057119527,2.9341942e-7,0.000012229906,0.000010602806,0.0003828053,0.0000026369398,0.000010723386,0.99692684,0.0003498982,0.0017156975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009547867,0.000007854296,0.0027720297,0.000009453648,0.0000032318985,0.000024896899,0.0003634153,0.0000071130153,0.00008589284,0.038319677,0.95823586,0.00007506896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70257664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97291166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013382147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002611116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935926385","doi":"","title":"Transfer by Contract at Common Law and in Equity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"German; Law and economics; Equity (law); Contract theory; Property rights; Entitlement (fair division); Common law; Freedom of contract; Law; Property (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); German model; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011678133545315768,"score_gpt":0.30709850209433237,"score_spread":0.2954203685490166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935926385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95036703,0.0011510262,0.00006702463,0.0047035418,0.000034008346,0.00013938402,0.0000037593545,0.000009997926,0.043524217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955414,0.0019945735,0.0000024139763,0.00040780613,0.000054295564,0.0000028562226,0.0000014099688,0.000005212447,0.001990024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857306,0.00007407452,0.00012714065,0.00009847067,0.00016342367,0.00096383924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997813,0.000048532795,0.000023884591,0.00006106645,0.000014894411,0.00007032374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001297454,0.000053844724,0.00009928522,0.000015332396,0.00029747759,0.00005666385,0.00015175223,0.000055608234,0.00009926347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004561876,0.000048295824,0.000032158856,0.00007169283,0.00007750754,0.00020877553,0.000024245173,0.00067845423,0.0000337323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017959628,0.000029247378,0.0054625664,0.0000011492649,0.0000087834205,3.0709649e-7,0.0005324443,0.000002736702,0.0019179014,0.9890442,0.000044597145,0.0029381071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019230511,0.00018215826,0.0040664985,0.00002007906,0.000022452306,0.0000442671,0.0035807402,0.00006567362,0.00053738535,0.44589683,0.54333514,0.00032571956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049092714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15914594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54329056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064979243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003917025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8561975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938806466","doi":"10.7202/1058572ar","title":"La fiducie de protection d’actifs : un mirage ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011390730844387013,"score_gpt":0.2489675395000546,"score_spread":0.23757680865566758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938806466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8486949,0.00045443643,0.009670861,0.0062982244,0.00034288398,0.0005186245,0.000021723245,0.000084734645,0.13391358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614867,0.00017009044,0.0009718769,0.000432723,0.00030305615,0.000063898944,0.0000041361973,0.000020721802,0.13654684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857265,0.00025940657,0.00016647627,0.00028906256,0.00021157798,0.00050085713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992731,0.00013561352,0.00010716442,0.00026084663,0.00003896363,0.00018429795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000787917,0.00013096222,0.00014246831,0.00004043123,0.00048362697,0.00011922644,0.0002824678,0.0005047165,0.0009351399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008516372,0.00015500073,0.00013130554,0.00041560008,0.00050886255,0.00020230075,0.0000332843,0.0007264467,0.0008854089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012957572,0.00010050073,0.0008244165,0.00008156283,0.000042598298,0.000011449094,0.01844221,0.0001909721,0.002475963,0.8441297,0.00047471724,0.13321297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022275177,0.000042685428,0.0033715435,0.000042056054,0.00004086309,0.00001976112,0.0029807596,0.0011290138,0.0010178176,0.04730969,0.943599,0.00022405323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005927027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048532622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9431243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00190687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029084587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939098456","doi":"","title":"TOWARDS A COSTS JURISPRUDENCE IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Commonwealth; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.09088388749194683,"score_gpt":0.35427415455647293,"score_spread":0.2633902670645261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939098456","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067456495,0.014331626,0.000023132481,0.84181714,0.00007240812,0.00086550956,0.000014471997,0.000025132942,0.13610494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97801435,0.015249467,0.00004426003,0.006285237,0.0000685337,0.000072812625,0.000004902003,0.0000044484837,0.00025600783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928474,0.0001061929,0.00014129705,0.000105651525,0.000121392804,0.00024069964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944025,0.000020618942,0.0000378304,0.00019840126,0.000053535783,0.0002493827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086890464,0.00005072122,0.00009278188,0.00003478345,0.0003578884,0.00009675239,0.0004018111,0.000032914024,0.00022191406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031647793,0.000038895225,0.000035735873,0.00044785623,0.00013643468,0.0001295243,0.000018127728,0.000121108475,0.0003422428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.330613e-8,0.0000033223007,0.00006300636,0.000024176989,0.0000011017548,0.0000014273218,0.00041763863,2.8871446e-7,6.466582e-7,0.9786804,0.0006703677,0.020137595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037057955,0.0000028568045,0.0021473602,0.0005373294,0.00000436594,9.4929544e-7,0.00008149026,7.629718e-7,0.0000020652376,0.0053137136,0.991817,0.000055042852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5667517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98407614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010480034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018645177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4398953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941406437","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v8n1p85","title":"Modernising English Land Law - Part 2","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Land law; English law; Political science; Geography; Land tenure; Archaeology","score_opus":0.12422715167170083,"score_gpt":0.45474775971785747,"score_spread":0.3305206080461566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941406437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0632895,0.000017828697,0.000028552668,0.005590846,0.0004029006,0.00018172558,0.00002086133,0.000045178967,0.9304226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689697,0.00002205455,0.00008549052,0.00030759355,0.00093323766,0.000025553276,0.000013914287,0.000007257624,0.029635178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838656,0.00011319827,0.000108036525,0.00018727791,0.00093880575,0.0002660923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989514,0.0002507972,0.00002046565,0.0001564868,0.00053208845,0.00008880429],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011395894,0.00004148181,0.00005424917,0.000036595306,0.00046986964,0.0003111755,0.00048330709,0.000052712745,0.0015663893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010933197,0.000040120478,0.00003581605,0.000110211935,0.00026654085,0.00027634704,0.00013297847,0.00023827955,0.0010537462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005840095,0.000030287349,0.0010829279,0.0000016885718,0.000008677742,0.0000010902608,0.0010121411,0.00004705637,0.0000777025,0.9964495,0.0010415739,0.00024152425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109351065,0.000007736213,0.00010064309,0.00001115375,6.2670614e-7,1.8199412e-7,0.0003079732,0.00028546638,0.000115890405,0.035567094,0.9634446,0.000049269725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019105963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009959357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96240306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001293562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009203155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942877045","doi":"10.7202/1057117ar","title":"La création de l’hypothèque légale immobilière","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012974502354023238,"score_gpt":0.2627065553476332,"score_spread":0.24973205299360998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942877045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6675004,0.0009971862,0.00066081557,0.0083685955,0.00032630796,0.0004279274,0.000058770915,0.000070293274,0.3215897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9122563,0.00082029426,0.0008230418,0.00033276048,0.00068629,0.00006077926,0.000019871994,0.000021941165,0.08497874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984315,0.00024302144,0.00026070263,0.00033642267,0.00017363387,0.00055472204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989334,0.0002658181,0.00013986952,0.00037469287,0.0000693316,0.0002169065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008399039,0.000116414514,0.00020845889,0.00004162131,0.00022595469,0.00013827381,0.00036816447,0.00033254627,0.0016254529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091546484,0.00018718533,0.00016768138,0.00041854059,0.00021679033,0.00034382634,0.00006378976,0.00035232454,0.0035408742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009274633,0.00021759856,0.020049796,0.000247836,0.000031032505,0.000014448463,0.0072822724,0.0006728744,0.0024622025,0.9439251,0.0031432859,0.021944322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038961388,0.000065623666,0.019068403,0.00022546903,0.000073634736,0.00005268269,0.0021936623,0.0034133256,0.00055993185,0.085011035,0.8885096,0.00043704832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022115249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054802996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88536626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007122853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003683992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943068920","doi":"10.7202/1057478ar","title":"The Nature and Diversity of Personal Property Security Systems in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Legislation; Personal property; Unitary state; Commensurability (mathematics); Property (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Homogeneous; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008797914751421188,"score_gpt":0.2180628367415985,"score_spread":0.2092649219901773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943068920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97785693,0.00030502808,5.098948e-7,0.0015249746,0.000071726296,0.00022519857,0.000019341362,0.0000038816424,0.019992415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856335,0.00010022113,0.0000034045158,0.000035188954,0.00004197156,0.0000044961826,9.088603e-7,0.0000017333377,0.0012487344],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954474,0.0000424835,0.00007004922,0.00008698034,0.00012422216,0.00013153527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997527,0.000052826264,0.0000412929,0.00007941305,0.00002997447,0.000043782235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027355753,0.000024894773,0.00007395804,0.0000075263574,0.00023531236,0.000018414594,0.0001401115,0.000046326048,0.000008729443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028365004,0.000021477274,0.00001556267,0.000091864924,0.000050228384,0.000044650056,0.00007546001,0.00014834008,0.0000019617166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010261145,0.00002099364,0.7980226,0.00014225286,0.000013026189,0.000004971125,0.012974548,0.000030006153,0.00010118537,0.1869348,0.0009908476,0.00075449434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006337622,0.000033789645,0.71137303,0.00022383564,0.000025926252,0.000010755274,0.048978534,0.0085451715,0.00006517778,0.011828448,0.21788737,0.0003941912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9345616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9445829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21689652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029971835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037959393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18098563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943499758","doi":"10.7202/1058511ar","title":"L’injonction, voie d’exécution forcée des obligations de faire","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.017843811206221968,"score_gpt":0.2690875239258403,"score_spread":0.2512437127196183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943499758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80680835,0.0012460188,0.0077212104,0.019709704,0.00069946185,0.00060574146,0.00008133943,0.00014232977,0.16298585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159418,0.0008447499,0.0019364374,0.0003269993,0.0008590736,0.00008374053,0.000040564344,0.000027550721,0.07993914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998323,0.0001296364,0.00032594008,0.0003547756,0.00019854492,0.000668086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889827,0.00011893604,0.00016683497,0.00036969176,0.00016955657,0.00027673255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056557433,0.00013245942,0.00020281109,0.00006756968,0.0008028714,0.0001486555,0.00033554342,0.00027786804,0.0010116198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010712975,0.00021242326,0.00020077785,0.00079266744,0.0004194155,0.00057531433,0.000059447615,0.0002914159,0.002376934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004069336,0.0001309113,0.042026818,0.00016118532,0.00003286966,0.000003249975,0.0051975655,0.0010110127,0.0010448813,0.93454,0.002575599,0.013271882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003782505,0.00008544772,0.06334974,0.00031407847,0.00012790025,0.00003935736,0.0032527952,0.00679823,0.00046740347,0.5553021,0.36943603,0.00044869925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034646932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017414305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3792379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012195945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036459236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943640747","doi":"10.7202/1058325ar","title":"Aspects conceptuels et juridiques du « droit de propriété »","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0164109177443871,"score_gpt":0.27646370230823947,"score_spread":0.2600527845638524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943640747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52551377,0.001314162,0.00065634784,0.034748055,0.00050731126,0.00076167437,0.00005909322,0.00014673885,0.43629283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220081,0.0017261994,0.0012871595,0.0015972961,0.0013267635,0.00008594472,0.000017221622,0.000045786066,0.07190553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976898,0.000266454,0.00037800462,0.0005140177,0.00029286795,0.0008588496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985542,0.00021157565,0.0002308191,0.0005063621,0.00013158597,0.00036541373],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010383682,0.0001886906,0.0003746577,0.00005077052,0.00028458008,0.00020187646,0.00061665545,0.00033056794,0.0014988054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013522313,0.0002906448,0.00024220433,0.00046688615,0.00038903288,0.0004529281,0.00013364258,0.00048543632,0.0029126932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007863835,0.00016502934,0.005751609,0.00015224164,0.00003547471,0.000028318715,0.0060687372,0.00011324149,0.0010514831,0.9795463,0.0021635178,0.0049161986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044300078,0.00012465622,0.0075577544,0.00030339032,0.00007759428,0.000057946756,0.0011487433,0.0011486439,0.0015259127,0.4314923,0.5555918,0.0005282221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027554382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010950933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5534283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009265948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009125721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944911387","doi":"","title":"Discoverability Principles and the Law's Mistakes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011791868784339903,"score_gpt":0.268150991119724,"score_spread":0.2563591223353841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944911387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82602966,0.0016211546,0.00046520718,0.024498247,0.00010772443,0.0003700623,0.0000025352574,0.000025376814,0.14688003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99043995,0.0012997799,0.000019512387,0.00018256305,0.0001943566,0.0000063503007,4.5235612e-7,0.0000050445383,0.007852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984988,0.00016472345,0.00014104026,0.000121090845,0.00021156302,0.0008627862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952567,0.00015157253,0.000081830665,0.00014502271,0.000040667448,0.000055219767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003011987,0.00006146424,0.00009777211,0.0000098708815,0.00082424015,0.00017490909,0.0002544053,0.000035035897,0.00004613906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072143645,0.000037085993,0.00006498704,0.00007695782,0.00039657328,0.00018306244,0.000025324738,0.0006929092,0.000031320702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019517998,0.00001256336,0.002273293,0.0000013019778,0.000016871967,5.5159664e-8,0.0016492073,0.0000068700074,0.0000148912,0.9949305,0.0000071589357,0.0010677538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072645186,0.000031332365,0.001668258,0.0000049906857,0.000016664952,0.000014327877,0.016666137,0.00004894104,0.000008707792,0.67104524,0.30967388,0.00009504307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024809337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020573577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32388526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027887803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009626201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945248121","doi":"","title":"THE SHORT LIFE AND LONG AFTER LIFE OF CHARITABLE IMMUNITY IN THE COMMON LAW","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Tort; Law; Common law; Sovereign immunity; Argument (complex analysis); Unconscionability; Political science; Liability; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.044480520706335964,"score_gpt":0.31304104353315926,"score_spread":0.2685605228268233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945248121","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101740755,0.38228235,0.0000020021655,0.22310911,0.00008229794,0.002306235,0.00003678951,0.000011067473,0.2904294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625463,0.02833813,0.0000030679157,0.008837837,0.000021466089,0.00007173669,9.2608025e-7,0.000003313456,0.0001772083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989709,0.0004959997,0.00015694716,0.00006188457,0.000119630866,0.0001945938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992984,0.00016194033,0.00003063572,0.0003381212,0.000028573797,0.00014234931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025489733,0.00004996458,0.000115167015,0.0000073798014,0.0009134822,0.00006600529,0.00039026115,0.000025608886,0.000091195456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018763289,0.000025043188,0.000032925727,0.00020749572,0.00033686994,0.000048119076,0.000017414628,0.00015674543,0.000014755143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5394492e-7,0.0000053972035,0.0035205993,0.00005222351,0.000005203022,6.7863346e-7,0.0014045323,2.3315287e-7,1.9576795e-7,0.99174374,0.001501537,0.0017652158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017610484,0.000002835696,0.013402165,0.0001099012,0.000014363834,6.7745793e-7,0.00049087673,0.0000010038984,4.8659746e-7,0.0016611759,0.9842574,0.000041489344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4259312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9565184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99008256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045638477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040660353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70258594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946065876","doi":"","title":"Assessing Tort Damages in the Conflict of Laws: Loci, Fori, Illogical","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Tort; Law; Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Choice of law; Conflict of laws; Common law; Delict; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Private law; Liability; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.1375191178248268,"score_gpt":0.39347463436927543,"score_spread":0.25595551654444865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946065876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035173953,0.041020613,0.000013393319,0.3520917,0.00006676401,0.0024387725,0.000015530084,0.00001997366,0.56915927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981877,0.008474072,0.000034206452,0.008944503,0.000072354065,0.00008306564,0.0000032641697,0.0000036119714,0.00050791673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917215,0.0002375931,0.00016369103,0.0000792652,0.00015023182,0.0001970875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943024,0.0001187662,0.000056568442,0.00023884857,0.000053930187,0.000101648555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012275586,0.000050100083,0.00012771861,0.000013115639,0.0003770373,0.00010700987,0.000498214,0.000033626842,0.0007051425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017244698,0.000026401669,0.000048666843,0.00023675087,0.00021943367,0.00012181355,0.000015680744,0.000115734925,0.000099403296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.840966e-8,0.000010723826,0.0011567808,0.00010563884,0.0000058274136,0.0000017801718,0.0026190763,8.85505e-7,0.000006741025,0.9374143,0.02727117,0.03140698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018131683,0.0000027818126,0.014254495,0.00014217691,0.000009905544,5.231547e-7,0.0008216589,0.000003275577,6.9004136e-7,0.0009960314,0.983709,0.000041329557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4976471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5779408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008463312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035448527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77208155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946219693","doi":"","title":"Die fiducie von Quebec und der trust : ein Vergleich mit verschiedenen Modellen fiduziarischer Rechtsfiguren im civil law, by Rainer Becker : book review","year":2008,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03775990150064473,"score_gpt":0.3137216502076842,"score_spread":0.2759617487070395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946219693","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002741341,0.73555064,0.000074554795,0.028579375,0.0004511568,0.0030028925,0.0002328181,0.00013874863,0.23194239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009854517,0.831082,0.0002264758,0.04387993,0.0008515889,0.00044790396,0.00029414202,0.0001381224,0.12209441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99158573,0.0014492343,0.0019912592,0.0017707406,0.0016476655,0.0015553619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953167,0.00036789084,0.0008728014,0.002104009,0.00049282477,0.00084578287],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022579606,0.0011127352,0.0021705294,0.00005672226,0.0026552668,0.00022120033,0.0018897086,0.0006723616,0.0126448665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020853465,0.0009871596,0.0011378503,0.0010708853,0.0015142459,0.00096894254,0.0005493536,0.0012970464,0.005525885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018552666,0.00031573378,0.00001579175,0.0064693103,0.00055828056,0.000027613016,0.0007171369,0.000005154319,0.000009353637,0.10455883,0.882807,0.004497219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005889786,0.000071625116,0.000006171754,0.01518091,0.002431996,0.0000054200004,0.00003347433,0.000046831374,0.00003528563,0.00022817901,0.9801668,0.0012043192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039366815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018577116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10984798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005472787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011091138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946281054","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198793731.003.0002","title":"2 The Origins of the Supreme Court","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Dominion; Political science; Irish; Certiorari; Constitution; Legislation; Judicial review; Original jurisdiction; State (computer science); Philosophy","score_opus":0.030136886832216388,"score_gpt":0.24172212380336108,"score_spread":0.2115852369711447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946281054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001436274,0.00002869867,0.000022392493,0.0005121365,0.00020342563,0.0004720838,0.000102610036,0.000026516378,0.9984885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012821167,0.000343772,0.00001470864,0.00003071527,0.000091138965,4.2223178e-7,0.0000022283941,0.000010993468,0.98668486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918944,0.000039423536,0.000103278806,0.00016477982,0.00033049966,0.0001725783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989736,0.00013229426,0.00020647467,0.0005166422,0.00011842792,0.00005256504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016742828,0.00011212451,0.00013489151,0.000017979017,0.00093625044,0.000039467828,0.0011079224,0.00017532325,0.0000299898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000826112,0.000077720695,0.00018118575,0.000009193655,0.0006257947,0.000040152765,0.000316465,0.00026586506,0.0000026836806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075397434,0.0000027633682,0.00001090247,0.000006272245,0.0000331594,5.0082326e-7,0.0005151724,0.00000254873,0.0000035422,0.9964025,0.0021586125,0.00085647596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008952836,0.0000065041745,0.000023137864,0.000026733425,0.00006219427,1.4456266e-7,0.0002164821,0.0000055346227,0.000018477791,0.0022765207,0.9971773,0.0000974194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016261331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018476156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022765496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040182218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7200976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946420703","doi":"10.7202/1067518ar","title":"Corporate Law Federalism in Historical Context: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Federalism; Corporate governance; Regulatory competition; Political science; Context (archaeology); Legislature; State (computer science); Federal law; Competition (biology); Consolidation (business); Political economy; Law; Economics; Legislation; Accounting; Politics; History","score_opus":0.07637408542294566,"score_gpt":0.2640928476731368,"score_spread":0.18771876225019113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946420703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38478544,0.0004888772,0.00012770637,0.37620676,0.0005002876,0.0004823962,0.0000502248,0.00005888073,0.23729944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932115,0.00007014328,0.000026685364,0.0065016174,0.000106802254,0.0000029528526,0.0000024345513,0.000004371147,0.00007349433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991958,0.00016600978,0.00019016901,0.000082235885,0.00019792715,0.0001678425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994716,0.000117159994,0.00012247631,0.000042050124,0.00005899345,0.00018768692],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034757357,0.000056003915,0.00013123528,0.000008811239,0.0030284121,0.00011895613,0.00015708295,0.000022454407,0.000019162355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003451105,0.00003944836,0.000020906986,0.00015842418,0.00018865796,0.00008362291,0.000037858565,0.0002788394,0.0000015953053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019987083,0.000006070774,0.00068062445,0.0000014672594,0.0000059963622,0.000013676819,0.0012950015,0.00017757945,0.0000015264065,0.99646884,0.0012132014,0.00011601439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005850971,0.000006211411,0.0002089015,0.000005471085,0.0000051077027,0.0000047129174,0.0013776217,0.0010108759,0.000005681546,0.003586856,0.9931438,0.000059674152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9866493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035377496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004194886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946860006","doi":"10.7202/1059559ar","title":"P.G.Q. et la Régie du logement c. Grondin et al. : marche arrière justifiée sur un chemin parsemé d’embûches","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02248827586646343,"score_gpt":0.28460990551247206,"score_spread":0.2621216296460086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946860006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61447924,0.0012554157,0.00026191698,0.15474026,0.0005906898,0.0008080512,0.0001822193,0.00011190255,0.22757028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9280027,0.0036860725,0.0011891434,0.0046143015,0.00042972746,0.00014214417,0.0000939005,0.000056881294,0.061785117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724704,0.00037332656,0.00046676077,0.00067827356,0.00040333442,0.00083125447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981046,0.0005651599,0.00026151672,0.00063400477,0.0001032405,0.00033148372],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021760184,0.00025795953,0.00041032085,0.00006604286,0.0002571644,0.000217497,0.00073568133,0.00030509863,0.0018066115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017603175,0.00036985654,0.00027157587,0.0005455941,0.00034643654,0.0003704389,0.0002985109,0.0006262731,0.0017969487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021794727,0.0005744072,0.018620543,0.00034342066,0.00012081724,0.000054482614,0.0059809,0.0003828802,0.0027489047,0.8995864,0.04319715,0.028368311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049741846,0.000048557093,0.011958796,0.0002597325,0.0000993069,0.000026735834,0.0014690456,0.00086148427,0.0010392846,0.020677358,0.962567,0.00049530074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018206021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009636846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9193698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047014875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037665572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947044200","doi":"10.7202/1059311ar","title":"Jurisdiction, Illegality and Fault: An Unholy Trinity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Ultra vires; Liability; Duty; Economic Justice; Private law; Political science; Common law; Delict; Law and economics; Public law; Business; Sociology; Doctrine","score_opus":0.01799961092328624,"score_gpt":0.2891396236564316,"score_spread":0.27114001273314536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947044200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8532138,0.000033032393,0.0001295481,0.0018273796,0.00008211637,0.00024384094,0.00002079769,0.00008670977,0.14436279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933923,0.00010692059,0.0002587656,0.00018369665,0.0002849504,0.000018431925,0.000010254062,0.000007914196,0.005736792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991833,0.000084220694,0.00014145763,0.00023191958,0.00012486891,0.0002342407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.000047091384,0.000058934394,0.000259047,0.00005452834,0.0001846914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054076535,0.00005324824,0.000118035445,0.000027639428,0.00032658756,0.000090946436,0.00017453897,0.000092366514,0.0001791111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004566509,0.00007529444,0.00004285682,0.00018262508,0.00009937988,0.000269831,0.000033144723,0.00013915738,0.00015061363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001545308,0.00014448655,0.083135426,0.00004447632,0.000015064247,0.000003194732,0.008817495,0.00003785146,0.0008721352,0.89779365,0.0005203175,0.008600448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006332828,0.000081506376,0.26033327,0.000031567553,0.000036817142,0.000012448001,0.0031241714,0.0007533916,0.00024851438,0.07908259,0.6552375,0.0004249337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002600349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012624807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81871104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001058754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009129434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39309672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947154093","doi":"10.7202/1059553ar","title":"Mitigation of Damage in the Context of Remedies for Breach of Contract","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Breach of contract; Context (archaeology); Unjust enrichment; Work (physics); Law; Compensation (psychology); Delict; Damages; Business; Order (exchange); Common law; Action (physics); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Phase (matter); Political science; Restitution; Private law; Liability; Economics; Commercial law; Public law; Psychology; Engineering; Black letter law","score_opus":0.018117270394140343,"score_gpt":0.28895617541915164,"score_spread":0.2708389050250113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947154093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763903,0.000046305926,0.00007050837,0.0013618785,0.000022017792,0.00049101387,0.0000428514,0.000003342174,0.02157179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993429,0.00003711593,0.00018754078,0.00004580376,0.000039046925,0.000024274246,0.000008199299,0.0000029291023,0.00031219926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995017,0.00004488709,0.00020116642,0.00006436811,0.00009568908,0.000092165625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992872,0.00031441578,0.00016353662,0.00013721529,0.00008347418,0.000014181821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006360208,0.000024659625,0.00013206652,0.000023747254,0.000028582994,0.0000047657077,0.00018230379,0.00004102493,0.000020112218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013885579,0.000026479462,0.000057893747,0.00012015588,0.0001089659,0.00006059543,0.000008479237,0.00004303201,0.0000019062621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021708856,0.00010338416,0.05460337,0.00020147488,0.000012124636,1.9621243e-7,0.027948016,0.000020306457,0.023143573,0.8909094,0.00018577758,0.002850693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027399731,0.0003540539,0.6731638,0.0006725372,0.00010904514,0.0000026950315,0.07827438,0.0022528602,0.051111557,0.15220857,0.038744964,0.00036561553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001620823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002460784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7387008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025055986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054903874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24502103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947294571","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1370","title":"Assn. of Justice Counsel: The Section 7 Liberty Interest in the Context of Employment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Constitutional right; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.07428482307714,"score_gpt":0.34827542114241916,"score_spread":0.27399059806527915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947294571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32350567,0.10931498,0.00018355386,0.1344632,0.0016408731,0.010616299,0.000114560105,0.0000900574,0.42007083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780378,0.01909117,0.000010954373,0.0023776537,0.000065618064,0.000045694862,0.000003001416,0.0000045704837,0.00036354933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989496,0.00029731006,0.00030242922,0.00010594747,0.00022965907,0.000115094124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999094,0.0002783253,0.00016532722,0.00032072488,0.0001219596,0.000019678928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016573613,0.000060683884,0.00018785406,0.000007817693,0.00010713926,0.000017602273,0.00042257714,0.000032754266,0.0002010905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006893137,0.000032785447,0.00008188644,0.00022794332,0.00016724542,0.000083064784,0.000031463824,0.00012537577,0.00004074055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038895064,0.0000844661,0.0003627344,0.00065815,0.000013336226,1.4672051e-7,0.003745011,0.0000016282548,0.00011364375,0.9846403,0.0078403605,0.0025363518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007536,0.000024260571,0.00045330258,0.00067545875,0.00006470062,4.8575356e-7,0.0014955415,0.000006715567,0.00003610754,0.00057523674,0.9965492,0.000043651886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057663927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016723275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035291705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006989153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93319803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947343900","doi":"","title":"(You're) Having My Baby: Surrogacy Fees as a Cost of Future Care Award in Canadian Tort Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Damages; Law; Harm; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.019739883197349095,"score_gpt":0.33989398540305477,"score_spread":0.32015410220570567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947343900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03527915,0.12561738,6.632538e-7,0.0045105666,0.0004863296,0.0019281938,0.00014933027,0.000029261842,0.8319991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96324265,0.035349496,0.000015672469,0.0010194022,0.00014453662,0.00004417032,0.000060553186,0.000011208313,0.00011228545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985794,0.0000656763,0.00043089438,0.00024063278,0.00030895413,0.00037447165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907357,0.000024009873,0.00018786607,0.00030140037,0.00015196447,0.00026119058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059124175,0.00014431788,0.00042654463,0.000028629844,0.0002371349,0.000032844306,0.00029920894,0.000082995924,0.000106508196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012101654,0.00011308122,0.00012111272,0.00023727692,0.000250877,0.0002456082,0.00006328141,0.00018032132,0.000024173596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018903305,0.000024238974,0.001639754,0.0022470083,0.000006244237,5.1584436e-7,0.0014693611,2.1763927e-7,0.0000026479815,0.9860265,0.00009368107,0.008487899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016916334,0.000024143987,0.0005682013,0.0028866788,0.00002321595,6.046903e-7,0.0014762944,0.0000010705711,0.000020231264,0.00029092003,0.9944025,0.0001369345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75547004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91942996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028216865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039000344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46113184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947526780","doi":"10.7202/1059353ar","title":"LE CONTRÔLE JUDICIAIRE DE L’APPLICATION DES PRINCIPES DE JUSTICE NATURELLE PAR LES ARBITRES DES GRIEFS QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01359492871908032,"score_gpt":0.2584146645603432,"score_spread":0.24481973584126285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947526780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84266984,0.011790883,0.005210742,0.0093228165,0.0001940097,0.0008121772,0.00008085682,0.00017588944,0.1297428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782552,0.0037761582,0.0043215607,0.00056516816,0.00093369436,0.00018909223,0.000024907653,0.00005390963,0.011880286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752295,0.00024038985,0.0004155603,0.00054382504,0.00024299725,0.0010342966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982561,0.00036824783,0.00027748442,0.000508664,0.00019801821,0.00039148304],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084484136,0.00022937435,0.00037264646,0.00006677708,0.0015034137,0.00015842941,0.0006628683,0.0004709887,0.00013243005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027664038,0.00033903972,0.00022795273,0.0006005559,0.001040533,0.00039203887,0.00011760839,0.0005395284,0.0003871952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024302815,0.000311613,0.031677302,0.0006843813,0.00006547279,0.000010441581,0.009426326,0.0011176222,0.004978594,0.92446136,0.00053910713,0.026703449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007932455,0.00012038372,0.07997544,0.0007122909,0.00047368577,0.00007673338,0.00962012,0.0063710036,0.0045496114,0.47935948,0.41707185,0.00087618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10723504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079690255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44510192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009823617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011742128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947699162","doi":"10.1017/s135232521900003x","title":"MULTIPLE REASONABLE BEHAVIORS CASES: THE PROBLEM OF CAUSAL UNDERDETERMINATION IN TORT LAW","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underdetermination; Causation; Tort; Plaintiff; Liability; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.016187626675876105,"score_gpt":0.3026653194304473,"score_spread":0.2864776927545712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947699162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8100754,0.00003931903,0.000038842652,0.0005394342,0.000054638705,0.0005365187,0.000011146629,0.000024550667,0.18868016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382406,0.0000062284776,0.000116090734,0.00009487161,0.00004527602,0.000049210674,0.000003336633,0.0000069735256,0.0058539636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990986,0.00021753077,0.0001529604,0.00012946464,0.00023448362,0.00016697324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935937,0.00029777037,0.00007148583,0.00018284682,0.000057177484,0.000031353982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012583918,0.000056231806,0.00008493518,0.000021322676,0.00017107597,0.000037705595,0.00021538378,0.00005736568,0.00014038266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041616597,0.000042856307,0.000039021823,0.00016751188,0.00019524472,0.00021579511,0.000042249005,0.00011055343,0.000038328326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000973743,0.000056227575,0.004590168,0.0000054623238,0.000002339557,0.0000014534037,0.002676953,0.00003631741,0.00044130135,0.99059474,0.000021878524,0.001563399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014438333,0.00016666776,0.032643616,0.00014340786,0.00007815017,0.000009902767,0.030322444,0.0003725323,0.0036667092,0.18500938,0.7455999,0.0005434451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021501293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022658197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8055854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008475695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011944064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947703422","doi":"10.7202/1066342ar","title":"The Private Law State","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Law; Municipal law; Political science; Comparative law; Philosophy of law; Commercial law; Tort; Civil law (Civil law); Liability","score_opus":0.018253781736423332,"score_gpt":0.29304985253850757,"score_spread":0.27479607080208424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947703422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024150107,0.000047426398,0.000023979908,0.006986487,0.00034425594,0.00013347434,0.000010305881,0.000026960708,0.968277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995218,0.00015717249,0.00012298641,0.000529461,0.0001674957,0.000003213046,2.9018568e-7,0.0000064177684,0.0037949737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918145,0.00008087201,0.00014149673,0.00007597422,0.0002618964,0.00025828337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995183,0.00008226904,0.000085301,0.00013674083,0.00006354671,0.000113894035],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070999016,0.00004753544,0.00005694661,0.0000057628267,0.007748602,0.00022541598,0.0003282541,0.000024469662,0.000177747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001372051,0.000030089393,0.00005592495,0.00007705152,0.00016988516,0.0001881166,0.00004426417,0.00020989556,0.00051662786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027537542,0.000007902966,0.00007477248,5.0587187e-7,0.00000678455,0.000001098689,0.0001641716,0.00001551018,0.000041857482,0.997396,0.00015899425,0.0021296707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009538113,0.000010394731,0.00015647817,0.0000040643336,0.0000026367495,0.000004091473,0.00020489481,0.000008710327,0.00012583024,0.029840188,0.9694974,0.000049973667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027157597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026582658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006022827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000106499865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99354315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947766905","doi":"10.7202/1059554ar","title":"Louisiana's Mixed Legal System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Association (psychology); Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.011379430425795463,"score_gpt":0.2516979804846845,"score_spread":0.24031855005888905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947766905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45714518,0.000046209083,0.00027605795,0.0018319853,0.00024049419,0.00029328864,0.000011120282,0.00014465414,0.540011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768203,0.000016528387,0.0003409897,0.00009901869,0.00047062195,0.000028385524,0.0000061136016,0.0000126568975,0.022205383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990923,0.000057134126,0.0001530932,0.00020656045,0.00016149176,0.0003294458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994036,0.000049190796,0.00006678694,0.00029334554,0.000044405195,0.00014266309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036723542,0.000055920704,0.00013846238,0.000033642285,0.00022333828,0.0001052181,0.00031491468,0.000090044516,0.00018194072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028522736,0.000081165614,0.00008838584,0.00022792027,0.000051306317,0.00014516847,0.000037423615,0.00011985477,0.0019323897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024476606,0.000017459875,0.0032840085,0.00004847295,0.000007719093,0.0000072688354,0.00075368397,0.00003390741,0.00025439955,0.99365586,0.0009555966,0.000979187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035087223,0.000030580675,0.011139477,0.00012296604,0.0000298659,0.000021638043,0.005450301,0.0011179537,0.00027007735,0.00720804,0.9739083,0.0003499151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002102618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007437901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031533002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001280134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947943243","doi":"10.7202/1059308ar","title":"Le texte législatif source de la responsabilité extra-contractuelle de l’État","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.00981145925541916,"score_gpt":0.26290248047828363,"score_spread":0.2530910212228645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947943243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69978076,0.0016757937,0.0025564805,0.015819412,0.0001887737,0.00050683867,0.000042403517,0.000097572854,0.27933198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83873916,0.00048827694,0.0018629382,0.00047853176,0.00062330574,0.00005604195,0.0000065475447,0.000045775094,0.15769945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971803,0.00072284567,0.00039246312,0.00049217074,0.0002300879,0.0009821517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974361,0.0013125872,0.00018829288,0.0006074073,0.000064887914,0.00039074325],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023351137,0.00018031201,0.00033072647,0.000056520505,0.00052655453,0.00020070256,0.0006141567,0.00044885158,0.00088074256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037320663,0.0002842275,0.00027384824,0.0004641571,0.0006230982,0.00030044548,0.000088630644,0.00059430243,0.0012947713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052306525,0.0003647239,0.020748997,0.00016950125,0.000047540747,0.000025597652,0.01227914,0.0021684763,0.006074231,0.9166144,0.0015567091,0.039898336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005066512,0.000052328083,0.016875766,0.00014950566,0.00006323863,0.000070879505,0.0019395186,0.005347921,0.0005427959,0.11781819,0.8562261,0.0004071119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00585222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010034766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8546694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006798921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096219656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947973764","doi":"10.7202/1058697ar","title":"L’arrêt Eve et le droit québécois","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016040382936182897,"score_gpt":0.26588435376096764,"score_spread":0.24984397082478474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947973764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40528145,0.0018852127,0.00032027744,0.059288457,0.00060413504,0.0005331374,0.00008072365,0.00010577939,0.5319008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8543128,0.0008367461,0.00044873255,0.001444802,0.0007377513,0.000049577215,0.000026028378,0.000038878847,0.1421047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979946,0.00015473581,0.0003547714,0.00049394637,0.00027068745,0.0007312752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986549,0.00017615425,0.00018859553,0.00058076705,0.00009042479,0.00030918192],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070149684,0.00016170838,0.00032826271,0.0000549009,0.0003019326,0.00013837918,0.00059956976,0.0002907849,0.0012906286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006967308,0.00026957082,0.000262048,0.0005723002,0.00024826897,0.0004335556,0.000121634104,0.00047664074,0.005379469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005173572,0.00016815403,0.0044712275,0.0001033309,0.000032220887,0.000009688312,0.0042287214,0.00014599998,0.00030850212,0.98323643,0.0023297695,0.004960787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004130806,0.000047966274,0.010225995,0.0001733034,0.00005259938,0.000024024093,0.0023761755,0.0011212105,0.00012512892,0.14829984,0.8366956,0.0004450723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06459787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023434293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83493656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005090966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008293247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947975783","doi":"10.7202/1059336ar","title":"L’appel des jugements interlocutoires en procédure civile québécoise","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014567524299276704,"score_gpt":0.26513150386613715,"score_spread":0.25056397956686044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947975783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6760472,0.001855664,0.0004664512,0.00969548,0.00065547245,0.00090429524,0.00009514716,0.000113078626,0.3101672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82076,0.00076912926,0.001119919,0.00033712044,0.0007218544,0.00008570203,0.000017599234,0.000034012304,0.17615466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981025,0.00014663977,0.0003391409,0.00045002485,0.00024655127,0.0007151751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989279,0.00011777391,0.00016150589,0.00044019538,0.00009494385,0.00025768942],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044984836,0.00017068027,0.00028164304,0.000060036044,0.00034353533,0.0001456546,0.00064027176,0.00023711014,0.0017614422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008517674,0.00025154342,0.00019511957,0.0004783643,0.00034191788,0.0004179113,0.00016845403,0.00031961198,0.0038159422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020468142,0.00045180737,0.04065176,0.0009331706,0.000115526906,0.000022013854,0.023338914,0.00020217749,0.0008552833,0.8569554,0.0060463506,0.0704071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044529708,0.00012498387,0.013960667,0.0008031482,0.00010551263,0.00002117317,0.0037923194,0.0015466711,0.00025678973,0.1286663,0.84972954,0.0005475885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00840147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012380898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8436832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007225557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002599035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948171024","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198823834.013.16","title":"The Irish Courts and the Administrative State","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Irish; Statute","score_opus":0.03810746889144529,"score_gpt":0.2852539147976382,"score_spread":0.2471464459061929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948171024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03184534,0.000060495142,0.0001694404,0.0037774472,0.000038932314,0.0001804168,0.000019259183,0.000023634391,0.963885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6683554,0.00068131596,0.0000627939,0.00011975336,0.000037820053,0.0000018653609,0.0000011064604,0.0000027393003,0.33073717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994496,0.00016587913,0.000043511045,0.00010052737,0.00011490304,0.0001255825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943423,0.00026057896,0.00003953756,0.00013501057,0.000075907534,0.000054760647],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021678959,0.000039954557,0.000050055318,0.00000386662,0.0016804256,0.00013736558,0.00019453761,0.00002272437,0.000004311648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029804723,0.000026746446,0.000030541763,0.000015634958,0.00070578855,0.000051491686,0.00012283189,0.00008978086,2.1226005e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002658276,0.000004515865,0.000024816814,9.863502e-7,0.000015423855,0.000006462822,0.005386802,0.0000011351998,0.000004307572,0.99018556,0.001342672,0.003000762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002705642,0.0000037097514,0.00021534153,0.0000021675762,0.000014694847,5.95414e-7,0.0060317228,0.00002734841,0.0000860777,0.002315443,0.990993,0.000039297793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006732824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013534981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98965037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023114451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015527371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948381335","doi":"","title":"THE IMPROBABLE RISE AND FALL OF AUCKLAND HARBOUR BOARD V THE KING","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Parliament; Jurisdiction; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Public administration; Business; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.019927657800610347,"score_gpt":0.28244493700424594,"score_spread":0.2625172792036356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948381335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047582924,0.31772357,0.0000038332764,0.43136328,0.00021965631,0.0029681975,0.000037802947,0.000022274387,0.20007846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9203845,0.071225,0.000011532762,0.002419732,0.00008704584,0.000038266895,5.634781e-7,0.000006926783,0.0058263824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993622,0.00012836042,0.00011668349,0.000078870464,0.00011636145,0.00019752842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935997,0.00011866019,0.00006670395,0.0003080664,0.000039431437,0.00010718857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012860919,0.00004740892,0.000097471784,0.0000062045197,0.00096016494,0.000083123756,0.00041207703,0.000021352856,0.00008184401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083238876,0.000021237844,0.00004020691,0.00013182231,0.00020161663,0.00003685163,0.000030243846,0.00009914449,0.000087580316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010326017,0.0000032251419,0.0029941367,0.00020005948,0.000024660947,4.2425106e-7,0.0018390643,0.0000028293875,0.000009502477,0.94421136,0.019955134,0.030758541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024416537,0.0000030368717,0.0018727594,0.00013057202,0.000019954843,3.9149808e-7,0.00013945354,0.000011414383,8.669313e-7,0.0013246519,0.9964378,0.00003467697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47788757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84121704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055142424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036240183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73849094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948421026","doi":"","title":"INJUNCTIONS - THE ABILITY TO BIND NON-PARTIES","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Position (finance); Order (exchange); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Style (visual arts); Sociology; Business; History","score_opus":0.06877479723390967,"score_gpt":0.3195584144455455,"score_spread":0.25078361721163583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948421026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027658062,0.011776339,0.000009920359,0.75687784,0.00012719881,0.0012420226,0.000028136097,0.000022858261,0.22714986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503342,0.010980807,0.000031640502,0.027791232,0.00025876384,0.00025456786,0.0000015244638,0.0000076293823,0.010339623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992901,0.00012589808,0.00012102616,0.00010268712,0.00013053825,0.00022971457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918836,0.000061077764,0.000025695237,0.00041285157,0.000050680617,0.00026132425],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078889844,0.000053201777,0.00008439882,0.000013548263,0.0017973528,0.00007662373,0.00042170467,0.000021687592,0.0026625984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021314825,0.000029775074,0.000056109457,0.0004103666,0.0001992458,0.00004701454,0.000021194812,0.00010778875,0.002502878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.4845176e-7,0.000013269909,0.0002467173,0.00007121854,0.000010227096,4.951908e-7,0.0062607825,0.000010647209,0.0000035316323,0.36066103,0.5979785,0.03474333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008834993,0.000003233019,0.0013194918,0.000053670858,0.00001689302,3.2714942e-7,0.00015631282,0.0000073254923,4.71692e-7,0.00047378716,0.99791354,0.000046108795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3578006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8615857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9475684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017913432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020577299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948860978","doi":"","title":"Indigenous Settlement Trusts: Recharacterizing the Nature of Taxation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Tax avoidance; Tax reform; Ad valorem tax; Public economics; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Double taxation; Payment","score_opus":0.02072167989923257,"score_gpt":0.3388506069123572,"score_spread":0.3181289270131246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948860978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12689413,0.24885425,0.00003180766,0.011333736,0.00090079993,0.0048942924,0.00028163652,0.000068553934,0.6067408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91189915,0.0865051,0.000029942794,0.001273166,0.000094979456,0.000037286845,0.000054625212,0.000006118494,0.00009960663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907583,0.00006463873,0.00032147806,0.00012333019,0.00026808315,0.00014661049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991305,0.000030625055,0.0004837519,0.00022340007,0.00009051792,0.000041190553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008623008,0.000076253535,0.00020545349,0.000009466518,0.00022420305,0.000017254531,0.00020786392,0.000054741275,0.000054674252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015271538,0.000044637844,0.00007425731,0.00014107027,0.00014592496,0.00013688987,0.000053318116,0.000182917,0.000010011146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017111621,0.000028563507,0.000102372804,0.0014892343,0.000008151598,2.2906306e-8,0.0009809289,3.0150456e-8,0.000054631266,0.97377646,0.000046491285,0.023511399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007380549,0.000022300284,0.00047639,0.00176355,0.000023948234,3.3330997e-7,0.00017721238,8.1056936e-7,0.00016284767,0.0011334362,0.9961044,0.00006096771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013472175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058153545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000587274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056544195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20365988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948992539","doi":"","title":"Facticity: Judicial Review of Factual Error in Comparative Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Prerogative; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Judicial activism; Administrative law; Commonwealth; Common law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03577750216303992,"score_gpt":0.3839838570238438,"score_spread":0.34820635486080387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948992539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.818328,0.018828617,0.00052458287,0.011905945,0.00016892355,0.00087729545,0.000009717819,0.00002181465,0.14933509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816565,0.017219521,0.00002028867,0.00016071483,0.00011371428,0.0000048072193,8.1477e-7,0.0000045309457,0.000819129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827814,0.00017749683,0.00024737403,0.00012916127,0.00030866597,0.00085913663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994032,0.0000818773,0.00019729025,0.00008691225,0.00017791656,0.00005281325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015103787,0.00007508647,0.0002455059,0.000059835853,0.00015348288,0.000016475276,0.00024001168,0.000043217202,0.00026474104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110092886,0.00006654883,0.00009122808,0.00029894582,0.00009909151,0.0001862207,0.000022741182,0.0009769732,0.00008090158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014012457,0.00006450719,0.0010712149,0.000019917294,0.00003443697,2.6853294e-7,0.0074236738,0.000006936328,0.00009040683,0.9904798,0.00007586732,0.0007189573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015138611,0.0006107421,0.007311908,0.0013146538,0.00009766694,0.00003345679,0.3538878,0.000056103156,0.00027131586,0.56965476,0.06470332,0.0005444283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037851948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01536441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42082503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030251662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85737014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949668603","doi":"","title":"DAMAGES FOR IMPROVIDENT EMPLOYER BEHAVIOUR: TWO JUDICIAL APPROACHES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Notice; Damages; Law; Dismissal; Duty; Political science; Common law; Punitive damages; Discretion; Labour law; Bad faith; Judicial discretion; Judicial opinion; Judicial review","score_opus":0.13363396325925153,"score_gpt":0.36845483874094515,"score_spread":0.23482087548169361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949668603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011939579,0.066273995,0.00039886218,0.83450484,0.0004078932,0.00817388,0.00026791048,0.00013979887,0.07789324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98355645,0.0059385127,0.00041163305,0.0074684205,0.000584787,0.00055084645,0.000021609341,0.000020909898,0.0014468288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917954,0.00005870923,0.00015404825,0.00014946061,0.00014285292,0.00031537926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993313,0.000031998123,0.00005410366,0.0002588571,0.000051357063,0.00027238124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007886865,0.00007774557,0.0001362958,0.000020024196,0.0011616149,0.000087247136,0.00042269556,0.000034249042,0.00010422963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010688876,0.00005706501,0.00010115191,0.00015915521,0.0001742355,0.000074244446,0.000019549505,0.00009557255,0.00011595895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.737883e-7,0.000012818049,0.00020008815,0.00007418703,0.00000890547,9.689414e-7,0.000993457,0.000005647187,0.000001617619,0.9732372,0.007221336,0.018243263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010049836,0.0000102964505,0.0007903982,0.00015113244,0.00007610704,8.6634446e-7,0.0001488058,0.000001008802,0.0000055006494,0.0067891846,0.9918239,0.000102294776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5819434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9223638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9846026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003547661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012081792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.893432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949960994","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2019.1605035","title":"Say on purpose: lessons from Chinese corporate charters","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Corporation; China; Corporate law; Function (biology); Empirical research; Accounting; Business; Public relations; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Law and economics; Management; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.11327191405026577,"score_gpt":0.3708078821274951,"score_spread":0.25753596807722934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949960994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94858384,0.0008343205,0.000036925034,0.022360396,0.0011409632,0.00025494516,0.000040610455,0.000029259485,0.026718734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446934,0.0010095957,0.00021633333,0.0010604657,0.00067252404,0.0000061944984,0.0000028791715,0.000013873406,0.0025487915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850345,0.00014240832,0.00043762237,0.00017299409,0.00050314324,0.00024038312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745196,0.00026259618,0.0014814864,0.0002052955,0.00045858131,0.0001400892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067429146,0.00016052641,0.0004408075,0.000057403384,0.00046276944,0.00010312288,0.00035320065,0.00006426604,0.00009412355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007895331,0.000113092276,0.0001502152,0.0003028624,0.00032315322,0.00032558932,0.00006240722,0.00027138207,0.0002678364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015669627,0.00022432455,0.022058945,0.000018147604,0.00045347694,0.000053556818,0.009413165,0.00020439216,0.0026433063,0.95471567,0.0080877105,0.001970638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019997025,0.0006135616,0.045938328,0.00030151903,0.00016233351,0.000008506035,0.012631518,0.000035784826,0.0005808715,0.3959915,0.54108924,0.0006471237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033399058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010665283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55872416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011180184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014566192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4611769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950114440","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v48i3.4735","title":"Fiducia in Public Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Private law; Duty of loyalty; Political science; Public law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0487478028784544,"score_gpt":0.30280212028204084,"score_spread":0.2540543174035864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950114440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040421886,0.0034699484,0.00008300509,0.018498424,0.0002979416,0.00046319707,0.000013726659,0.00004244907,0.9730891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619954,0.036193468,0.000288196,0.00025393532,0.000112218695,4.278876e-7,0.0000037601549,0.0000043361983,0.001148233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999296,0.00008028414,0.00012133728,0.00015789468,0.00017724468,0.00016721351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991698,0.00003958179,0.00019617968,0.0004114857,0.00009387606,0.00008902655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061717536,0.000059799033,0.00019962547,0.000016147142,0.001040768,0.000051120503,0.0007543725,0.000060016035,0.000347038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052502186,0.00006767336,0.00008523308,0.00010150529,0.00043504866,0.00035111487,0.00009073224,0.00009774966,0.00009459099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010839132,0.000027784788,0.00031330567,0.00010764632,0.0000044063813,0.0000014698209,0.00033990943,3.2178846e-7,0.0000067223814,0.9981473,0.00040725493,0.0006427661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010885371,0.000005143959,0.00017338182,0.00036784777,0.000016120415,6.907898e-8,0.00008286541,0.0000027336084,0.000009498797,0.0022317271,0.99692786,0.00007389948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039851278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04883491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006640975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009003788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96852136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950140100","doi":"","title":"Apex Courts and the Common Law: Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Apex (geometry); Political science; Dispute resolution; Legal profession; Position (finance); Jurisprudence; Business","score_opus":0.005204800107788838,"score_gpt":0.2611055218755645,"score_spread":0.2559007217677757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950140100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8071619,0.0020880352,0.0005442919,0.12382009,0.00041551594,0.0004222669,9.641366e-7,0.00003972808,0.06550717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910935,0.0022999234,0.000009708515,0.00025364239,0.0010081175,0.0000038338044,6.334673e-7,0.0000047208405,0.0053259064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988528,0.00012685731,0.00010202675,0.00008805873,0.00017160052,0.0006586409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996955,0.000057539863,0.00007066337,0.00010022685,0.000037434507,0.00003865182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022554628,0.000045611534,0.00007734456,0.000013518912,0.0007180742,0.00010890771,0.00016118801,0.000032872438,0.00005470839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016846416,0.000029967903,0.00003692109,0.00005773629,0.00019966533,0.00014857893,0.000022339716,0.0007135827,0.000057751557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014444973,0.00000785468,0.00024297503,4.962396e-7,0.000014147282,4.374178e-8,0.0006909498,0.0000060110965,0.000029110599,0.9949225,0.00017835844,0.003893098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039771348,0.00002339477,0.00017068199,0.0000014767463,0.000011863765,0.00002617465,0.0029251538,0.000035001747,0.0000071150603,0.6618486,0.3345076,0.000045192308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015892648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069055785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33432925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022765942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004069487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55229187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950720224","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0022","title":"Marriage, work, and the invention of family law in English legal thought","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Wife; Domestic relations; Law; Cognitive reframing; Ideology; Situated; Sociology; Relation (database); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012096950998904352,"score_gpt":0.23526338550525075,"score_spread":0.2231664345063464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950720224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32992738,0.00028518907,0.000035122226,0.0006957941,0.00011074133,0.00011740533,0.0000030724436,0.0000047757712,0.6688205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731326,0.000261662,0.000201654,0.000038517665,0.000055121647,4.202987e-8,3.5181316e-7,0.000001480436,0.0021279275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949205,0.00012507015,0.000088863475,0.00005697128,0.0001519917,0.000085046704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963725,0.00005533323,0.00011312299,0.000070235066,0.00008283789,0.00004123485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005775068,0.00003231791,0.000097568496,0.0000074150084,0.0002631926,0.00002581564,0.00019170738,0.00003878534,0.00021361906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011116096,0.000027743909,0.00005556903,0.000037893573,0.00035910014,0.0004216133,0.000049124665,0.00009692243,0.0000013430366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005823495,0.000019710282,0.0016241826,0.0000028901306,0.000009079073,8.458077e-7,0.005801012,0.000009567059,0.000022640368,0.9919213,0.00019638294,0.00033412286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018329943,0.000025780539,0.014488722,0.000043969703,0.000024142166,6.610638e-7,0.034167286,0.000017519205,0.000011941657,0.0031333717,0.9461828,0.000070820184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15390627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2887558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98878795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085094325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003634858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85172796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951349879","doi":"","title":"The Canada Not-for-Profit Corporations Act and Quebec Trust Law: A New opportunity for Quebec Donors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Trust law; Business; Authorization; Context (archaeology); Profit (economics); Blind trust; Law; Asset (computer security); Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07197905959020684,"score_gpt":0.31012826669265336,"score_spread":0.23814920710244653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951349879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002226352,0.006908907,0.00010659716,0.9712429,0.0001632943,0.0031784095,0.0005035569,0.000021483016,0.015648508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60337627,0.036099344,0.00023080637,0.06260464,0.0011095441,0.0015940317,0.00007658881,0.000058334364,0.2948504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991249,0.00009423787,0.00019137021,0.00014334563,0.00012411209,0.00032206016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984327,0.0004073025,0.00010669696,0.00032182332,0.0001087442,0.0006227121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008794697,0.00008962107,0.00014176585,0.000008988948,0.0025935748,0.0001279706,0.00039792762,0.00003806836,0.00011687539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044607327,0.00004604115,0.00005946463,0.000104963416,0.00028103203,0.000098304285,0.000016956365,0.00005967781,0.000009051378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010828398,3.0810978e-7,0.00012963876,0.000025190411,0.000008658323,1.8450726e-7,0.00012395025,7.7154084e-8,0.0000012077694,0.8373041,0.11302954,0.04937606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007396526,0.0000036445886,0.0010236336,0.00010795513,0.00003319894,4.7630596e-7,0.000102019534,0.0000020983607,0.0000023980124,0.0030382378,0.99552476,0.00008761044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90863824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006859362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017157745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951382998","doi":"","title":"RETURN OF THE UNDEAD: FUNDAMENTAL BREACH DISINTERRED","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Bad faith; Breach of contract; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Damages","score_opus":0.042202756622093496,"score_gpt":0.34220507746431306,"score_spread":0.30000232084221956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951382998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017654972,0.035161443,0.000025568082,0.31678775,0.00036366485,0.001774591,0.0000841198,0.000026710488,0.62812114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904717,0.00195536,0.000011534837,0.0039663785,0.00008085096,0.000005963492,0.0000021348812,0.0000046554783,0.003501408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993222,0.00008732144,0.00015291841,0.00007282577,0.0001608988,0.0002038399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941665,0.000045040695,0.00006699958,0.00028925884,0.000031132146,0.00015094242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010907303,0.00004615105,0.00008964057,0.000010896723,0.0005477475,0.000023728548,0.00049749983,0.000025320414,0.00040480986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007146105,0.000025642961,0.00008279068,0.0002470856,0.00026328242,0.00003065352,0.000027283899,0.0001003904,0.000058115813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012080137,0.000014450921,0.0027830666,0.00013257549,0.000021369337,0.0000012708547,0.0032911715,2.078037e-7,0.000025383732,0.9161695,0.0380752,0.039484564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019674408,0.0000020650407,0.0059446814,0.00022806715,0.000018522282,0.0000012299647,0.00028832103,5.7468975e-7,0.000008176951,0.00076131185,0.9926901,0.000037267488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38233015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9284896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97281677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025212788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040163693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62178296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951531909","doi":"","title":"THE ATTACHMENT OF CHARITABLE PROPERTY AT LAW AND IN EQUITY: OR, WHY THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL IN RE CHRISTIAN BROTHERS OF IRELAND IN CANADA IS RIGHTS AND ITS CRITICS ARE WRONG","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Indemnity; Insolvency; Equity (law); Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.050197672895852516,"score_gpt":0.30455500081171716,"score_spread":0.25435732791586463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951531909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7080803,0.08478491,3.9399166e-7,0.18728541,0.0000456103,0.0031147788,0.00016547139,0.000002505641,0.016520632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897346,0.008162916,0.0000033023755,0.0017892342,0.000005771019,0.000024631068,9.3618e-7,0.0000032742978,0.00027535312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918157,0.00009379254,0.00025516097,0.000097005206,0.00016808246,0.00020441614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956244,0.000057111865,0.0000890838,0.00016443255,0.000037806738,0.00008911221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007403419,0.000063353385,0.0002003954,0.000013759385,0.00027346416,0.0000134026,0.00024225467,0.000026633725,0.00004169603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027498805,0.000029099197,0.0000144610185,0.00016938525,0.00022541401,0.000036389276,0.00003786901,0.00011453117,3.579476e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093581,0.00018185924,0.18121809,0.00639295,0.00013814219,0.000075248245,0.16205917,0.00021718306,0.000034503813,0.622505,0.020173838,0.006910448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003541518,0.000020500576,0.024281431,0.0030250032,0.000029713892,0.000002306158,0.0016676424,0.000019126213,0.00003159511,0.001667473,0.96878046,0.00012058047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99983436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9486066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010335707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001982708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3517239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952393837","doi":"","title":"Moving beyond Uberrima Fides? the General Duty of Honesty in Contractual Performance and Punitive Damage Awards in Anglo-Canadian Contract Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Fides; Law; Honesty; Duty; Unjust enrichment; Tort; Business; Political science; Liability; Philosophy; Restitution; Theology","score_opus":0.016780272255379574,"score_gpt":0.2867413488882816,"score_spread":0.26996107663290203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952393837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710951,0.00014659115,0.000022600252,0.0016908923,0.00010946358,0.00017898993,0.000034252647,0.0000053451154,0.026716799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981026,0.0003819911,0.000086460466,0.0009855721,0.0003360633,0.0000065428817,0.0000019292302,0.000008026887,0.00009081836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869895,0.00019176825,0.0003071025,0.00013177344,0.00027556915,0.00039485501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999068,0.00021522096,0.00015428965,0.00011832205,0.00024567146,0.00019846074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017498144,0.00009995739,0.00017595041,0.00010050433,0.0007712975,0.00015697409,0.0002278624,0.00008899173,0.00008801712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012231672,0.00007824804,0.00003861517,0.00025908678,0.0007329225,0.00039062733,0.000017698902,0.0004120462,0.000006504726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025748022,0.00027012965,0.32667908,0.000023903916,0.00008819912,0.00023105288,0.17581658,0.00019782368,0.0014871,0.4738492,0.0019381345,0.019161308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014135449,0.0001184769,0.8724439,0.00009211771,0.000027078666,0.00011202728,0.008000968,0.0029517745,0.00014557569,0.0045811706,0.109809734,0.00030363208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11511445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6553005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016532073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060126104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89077806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952608107","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-05-22","title":"Damages without duty","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Duty; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.01019217149654458,"score_gpt":0.25134800550708025,"score_spread":0.24115583401053567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952608107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16170666,0.000099616955,0.0002135017,0.0009658263,0.00010333796,0.000065029715,0.0000040745313,0.000013696127,0.83682823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98774105,0.0001918495,0.00096938864,0.00003347191,0.00007550001,9.670829e-9,3.9693825e-7,0.000001862658,0.01098645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957687,0.000045567278,0.00004869099,0.00005832608,0.00016427392,0.000106259264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964774,0.000018037093,0.00007697339,0.00008312105,0.00008278237,0.00009134256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020789579,0.000031083175,0.00007056722,0.000005157667,0.0005870856,0.000024463163,0.00025436896,0.000034007535,0.0038142477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005145488,0.000033053835,0.000055013716,0.000016021742,0.00012973837,0.00040683176,0.000036663223,0.00007107025,0.000054851218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021703085,0.000051601502,0.013451371,0.0000041969565,0.000028638848,0.0000038273884,0.010687042,0.000018971705,0.00039638253,0.9710465,0.0021375648,0.002152172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002444602,0.00002104315,0.0072105112,0.00000937727,0.000011391634,0.0000017200385,0.014994646,0.000014297421,0.00001794116,0.0005264338,0.9768942,0.000053979973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12044124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20460525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97475666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014582775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066755114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954005072","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0023","title":"The patriation of Canadian corporate law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Common law; Political science; English law; Corporate law; Legislation; Comparative law; Sources of law; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Business","score_opus":0.01927071117823441,"score_gpt":0.21882490558066606,"score_spread":0.19955419440243166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954005072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08725339,0.00013623852,0.00003839735,0.002573387,0.00015889059,0.00010634175,0.000015651844,0.0000040618943,0.9097136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756056,0.00029821432,0.0001462637,0.00002480219,0.000039464252,1.0934105e-8,6.529072e-7,0.0000011279603,0.0019288813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963033,0.0000510823,0.00006145081,0.000035123856,0.0001283195,0.00009370898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948794,0.00003203188,0.00017896232,0.000069689886,0.00013580597,0.00009557733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032259652,0.00002180561,0.000048768496,0.000009435059,0.0009528663,0.00002010255,0.00021577186,0.000028895576,0.00047324694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005304327,0.000019381518,0.000042855667,0.00003866267,0.00014923484,0.00021820937,0.000013040205,0.000048068076,0.000011010729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062465933,0.0000046568193,0.00073272793,7.9451394e-7,0.000008995403,4.862974e-7,0.0024648353,0.000014039364,0.000053645475,0.99571884,0.00048338933,0.00051131716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014730149,0.000017240362,0.002730458,0.000005084572,0.000008934709,4.40924e-7,0.010059644,0.00001701791,0.000019223002,0.0021382994,0.9848271,0.00002924364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97488403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99708176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020293714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019159935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7328773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954244999","doi":"","title":"Cancelling a Holding Deposit Agreement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Leasehold estate; Business; Damages; Third party; Subject (documents); Law; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.011670044194523181,"score_gpt":0.2825201813081332,"score_spread":0.27085013711361006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954244999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92702115,0.001632931,0.007437293,0.0027125417,0.00023081439,0.00020787097,6.150738e-7,0.000030359266,0.060726415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98681074,0.0030866393,0.000106706786,0.00009964568,0.00038235483,0.0000045540346,4.4393562e-7,0.0000067980436,0.009502096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809706,0.00004486959,0.00013388232,0.000114842405,0.0002611875,0.0013481396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968046,0.000023780936,0.000082082035,0.00009221993,0.00004480911,0.00007666494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012567426,0.000058194863,0.00007426597,0.000033170672,0.0005684304,0.00010068312,0.00024902678,0.000036708945,0.0001324445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012821867,0.000053897602,0.00006229142,0.0001470687,0.000025306037,0.0001444988,0.00002063274,0.0006925495,0.00021874417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004350191,0.000019656283,0.007080831,0.0000018098274,0.000030915016,5.3486167e-7,0.0013724142,0.00014795463,0.0008713541,0.9791215,0.000041477324,0.01130721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011162926,0.00024208524,0.002227077,0.00007913187,0.00006753378,0.000069004454,0.036787223,0.0005497249,0.00069138705,0.38197672,0.57559866,0.0005951632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028852953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011776602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5971448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011324214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013691675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.657162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956811029","doi":"10.5937/spz63-20473","title":"Fiduciary transfer of ownership: One or more ownerships?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strani pravni zivot","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Fiduciary; Beneficiary; Business; Trust law; Creditor; Blind trust; Database transaction; Law; Estate planning; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics; Duty; Estate; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.061874682099831595,"score_gpt":0.33078795820059315,"score_spread":0.26891327610076154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956811029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81012285,0.00013578369,0.00044191498,0.013217392,0.00022868323,0.0010467661,0.00009968141,0.00013755879,0.17456935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855468,0.000074101656,0.00035133696,0.00024735846,0.00018174885,0.000018047906,0.000010511999,0.000015808135,0.0135542415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985829,0.0001003225,0.00026226896,0.00026838813,0.0004464955,0.00033962092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927294,0.00014032633,0.00005204203,0.00031674546,0.00008597107,0.0001319704],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051238306,0.000116639225,0.0002121158,0.000049256872,0.00018095916,0.000040068015,0.0004039344,0.00013999899,0.002678333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052751835,0.000090786954,0.000109669454,0.00035274218,0.00022492088,0.00021029929,0.00001904755,0.00020343883,0.00020445685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023045656,0.0005384873,0.004016389,0.00022137069,0.00012563715,0.000005791895,0.040020067,0.00003619301,0.018704204,0.92206335,0.0012568752,0.012781187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019476282,0.00037617105,0.025143193,0.00017977224,0.00015386372,0.0000026603377,0.03274625,0.000059825976,0.0130894035,0.0060797436,0.9193718,0.000849685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017194743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019250734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9181149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003981124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002951443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957456258","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190634100.013.31","title":"Fiduciary Principles in Contemporary Common Law Systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of care; Duty of loyalty; Statute; Duty; Doctrine; Common law; Law; Political science; Loyalty; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.13027135381807295,"score_gpt":0.35381149249840804,"score_spread":0.2235401386803351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957456258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063640584,0.006309127,0.000012621714,0.0012047857,0.0013030766,0.0013706671,0.00021309638,0.00014875823,0.9888015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.424841,0.009510364,0.000033234333,0.00034013562,0.00090705266,0.00016390767,0.00035220894,0.000035425917,0.56381667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751896,0.00033564577,0.0006067719,0.00049891736,0.0005917736,0.00044795588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985754,0.0003189255,0.00028310413,0.0005833502,0.0000835298,0.00015569048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079304195,0.00026637313,0.0006232225,0.00011519724,0.0003299884,0.000271572,0.0008148121,0.0006575815,0.00022690052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029234476,0.00023520771,0.00013425102,0.00028248256,0.00023287616,0.0002275835,0.00021713518,0.0006867211,0.0006424063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003848495,0.000075909986,0.0014605859,0.00017731298,0.000019148556,0.0000062322633,0.00073473173,0.00001390148,1.18716315e-7,0.86293936,0.13392282,0.00064602355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016625806,0.000012577003,0.0002541313,0.0004420849,0.000009290221,5.5316787e-7,0.0017474797,0.000047766178,8.664268e-7,0.00091733906,0.9960894,0.0003122519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13985355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046852686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8621666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034434412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013444549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97053975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963420193","doi":"10.29173/alr2556","title":"Justice Jean E. L. Côté, The Court of Appeal, and the Changing Nature of Contract Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital; Stephen Lewis Foundation; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.018138512199004208,"score_gpt":0.32201244579554406,"score_spread":0.30387393359653986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963420193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008585352,0.19622466,0.000010548933,0.1448514,0.00022416456,0.0026899027,0.00001510711,0.000013173518,0.6473857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576816,0.03528566,0.0000123239315,0.0058037634,0.00006484043,0.00002015639,0.0000017847357,0.0000048176457,0.0011250536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999248,0.00015089636,0.00019461245,0.00010111357,0.0001694703,0.00013589452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814,0.0013049364,0.00017856105,0.000280178,0.000067151705,0.000029209179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011054953,0.00006138934,0.00023464963,0.0000044022845,0.00027377758,0.000019756219,0.00029746132,0.00004880603,0.00011162146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001792519,0.00003064592,0.000078728735,0.00017036543,0.00045982638,0.00007083039,0.000055744804,0.00015155044,0.00002253043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022465892,0.000008669617,0.00002255184,0.00040055587,0.00001393358,3.3337688e-8,0.00097500463,5.028948e-7,0.0000068728564,0.9976573,0.00033174,0.00058056583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001450022,0.000005615299,0.00003525937,0.0005965318,0.0001636451,5.751242e-7,0.000291493,0.000026632493,0.00001504953,0.00086909847,0.997806,0.000045059944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019717975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012136498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060340285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027008904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963484862","doi":"10.29173/alr2544","title":"Litigating on One's Doorstep: Access to Justice and the Question of Venue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Eviction; Enforcement; Debtor; Law; Law enforcement; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Debt; Creditor; Finance","score_opus":0.03889784876769241,"score_gpt":0.38305976953369986,"score_spread":0.34416192076600743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963484862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108941436,0.016218338,0.00003270294,0.12231987,0.00023234423,0.0032533675,0.000008375179,0.00001965127,0.7489739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986126,0.0066340426,0.000054704866,0.0062642037,0.00008248272,0.00005440113,0.0000016599515,0.000004386038,0.0007781023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941456,0.000139803,0.00013420709,0.00010258839,0.00012427723,0.00008457047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991416,0.0005209142,0.000082524086,0.00017336762,0.000039425315,0.000042204345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005958803,0.000040449962,0.00013536932,0.0000046198243,0.00016466611,0.00004287828,0.00019766075,0.00001933699,0.00005754342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003589762,0.000027955004,0.000029671166,0.00013936516,0.00009346512,0.00009156466,0.000050488314,0.000056150227,0.00012739027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021668204,0.000007363558,0.00007591507,0.0004142115,0.0000030651374,1.8393028e-8,0.00055310153,0.0000022286715,0.0000057951556,0.99514276,0.00018480713,0.003608586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012300698,0.00001656741,0.0005876384,0.0027212114,0.00010235787,1.983647e-7,0.00005304113,0.000009408335,0.000031095573,0.0022757757,0.99401486,0.00006486396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019539865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005108435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001232143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021849437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963746280","doi":"10.29173/alr2554","title":"Beware of Tiger: The Logic of Justice Jean E. L. Côté's Tort Law","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Tiger; Law; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Liability; Algorithm","score_opus":0.03666834150768108,"score_gpt":0.3293167625038234,"score_spread":0.29264842099614236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963746280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012249484,0.26181668,0.0000074110644,0.06086055,0.00051963225,0.0011407171,0.00002544492,0.000007425428,0.6743972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6932697,0.21244764,0.00015760535,0.011501382,0.00029880984,0.00005394122,0.000016120139,0.00002277316,0.08223199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836737,0.00025570407,0.0005556549,0.00024115275,0.00031174588,0.0002683939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765825,0.0010142804,0.0004013766,0.00067716936,0.00016223679,0.000086712374],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069554406,0.00015020215,0.00049044087,0.000005402252,0.00021996084,0.000017572302,0.0006674833,0.00009812579,0.0036952186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014854144,0.00010294321,0.00026565,0.00040925323,0.00076257705,0.00016037532,0.00012856006,0.00015793991,0.0013244841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010625674,0.00007419723,0.00008671599,0.0035111757,0.00003132753,2.0170884e-7,0.00043690114,0.00000430951,0.0000130217395,0.9896648,0.003260945,0.0029153766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062944135,0.00004024739,0.000046482422,0.002290732,0.00047277374,8.9566254e-7,0.00013528886,0.000009306175,0.000036864665,0.002653408,0.9941301,0.00012095303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08894521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024927318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99086916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033025422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009754712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964064122","doi":"","title":"Good Faith between Public and Private","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Autonomy; Personhood; Doctrine; Fair dealing; Law; Meaning (existential); Political science; Relational contract; Law and economics; Common law; Private law; Sociology; Epistemology; Good faith; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030901447963001944,"score_gpt":0.3212494175729185,"score_spread":0.2903479696099166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964064122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8819897,0.0006051479,0.0026954247,0.047510106,0.000086843844,0.00016373562,0.000004215062,0.000041629908,0.06690317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993882,0.0021012244,0.00006937936,0.00003720124,0.0006895705,0.000003279654,7.166216e-7,0.000007260568,0.0032093613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982387,0.000052307918,0.00011627402,0.00011816458,0.00020055797,0.0012740295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942166,0.000027757098,0.00016656217,0.000188668,0.00004694334,0.00014843138],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017199907,0.00006277165,0.00009048957,0.000029457742,0.0031815842,0.0006490433,0.00052558025,0.000054437303,0.00001946101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014041181,0.000054120574,0.000039551276,0.00004480823,0.00019694559,0.00047310832,0.000079170284,0.00075703964,0.000024564668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.617351e-7,0.0000075672765,0.051236454,5.157266e-7,0.000024364672,2.4190513e-7,0.00024103369,4.751672e-8,0.000014706005,0.9172355,0.000023304372,0.0312155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002713374,0.000045253255,0.062186196,0.0000047056355,0.000018783763,0.000010981203,0.0012686836,0.0000027992041,0.000011233226,0.56155336,0.3745091,0.00011757268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006428061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058134496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3744858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026030865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012411835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99811614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964638793","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190659837.013.48","title":"Exceptional Procedures to Correct Miscarriages of Justice in Common Law Systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Appeal; Commission; Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Collateral; Law reform; Royal Commission; Politics; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.04501358708682981,"score_gpt":0.3537681719494644,"score_spread":0.30875458486263463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964638793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027496873,0.00079879473,0.00005984112,0.0007486269,0.0012295325,0.0010422072,0.0002385848,0.000041329822,0.9930914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69071585,0.0032445698,0.00010231216,0.00021141865,0.0009946652,0.00016542642,0.000121747966,0.000018977988,0.30442503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984434,0.00012515837,0.00037466,0.00028727684,0.0005121044,0.00025735414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990464,0.00030502595,0.0001698651,0.00023061932,0.00013986004,0.00010825595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035448323,0.0001490081,0.00040103192,0.00009207011,0.00015894149,0.00008501918,0.00047474453,0.00028749183,0.0002869853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007855943,0.00012885561,0.000072795425,0.000271826,0.00011188832,0.000070674265,0.00009019957,0.00024729565,0.00018993558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001124912,0.00010190867,0.00044305893,0.0010521362,0.00001948813,7.19829e-7,0.002104215,0.00024902343,0.0000046597,0.68996143,0.30507022,0.0009819083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010891635,0.000027516784,0.0005514591,0.0006992141,0.00004740251,6.249146e-7,0.0046043233,0.000024295283,0.000004735445,0.00060305395,0.99311036,0.00021808328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034809496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056074623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68935835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016361423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007106876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9716178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964923292","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1365","title":"Ernst v. Alberta Energy Regulator: A “Frack-tious” Divide on Statutory Immunities and Charter Damages","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Supreme court; Damages; Law; Political science; Plaintiff; Tribunal","score_opus":0.018979849479046115,"score_gpt":0.2877238270162798,"score_spread":0.26874397753723367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964923292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03092155,0.07952311,0.00002915287,0.031100595,0.00039777148,0.0013555433,0.0000782084,0.00016382408,0.85643023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8846703,0.07565785,0.000035474648,0.0070132855,0.00020596023,0.000091177084,0.000033513432,0.00002534225,0.03226705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987009,0.00019783281,0.00024665066,0.00025981767,0.00030794818,0.00028682742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989907,0.00019311284,0.00010654373,0.00050107995,0.00008574348,0.0001228242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004624488,0.00014999617,0.0002941498,0.000021250173,0.00041941646,0.00010479612,0.00030183952,0.00006472457,0.0008483181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039591538,0.000128157,0.00008902382,0.000111700174,0.000271006,0.00026240209,0.00009639035,0.00013030863,0.00030168632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023523626,0.000029587793,0.00024898484,0.00025342937,0.000019514151,5.3377033e-7,0.0006700578,4.164102e-7,0.000043402786,0.98328704,0.010873424,0.004571281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010165102,0.000027402712,0.00043641144,0.00086314726,0.000031157837,8.5833204e-7,0.000129304,0.000003984646,0.000019869194,0.0016310415,0.99658287,0.00017228266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012203122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008758291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055837998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089785055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965103463","doi":"","title":"LES LIMITES DE LA BONNE FOI EN MATIERE DE VENTE: LE CAS DES VICES CACHES","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warranty; Duty; Notice; Obligation; Liability; Business; Damages; Law; Civil code; Real estate; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04779902939710829,"score_gpt":0.33278136753259063,"score_spread":0.28498233813548235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965103463","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047061376,0.59102577,0.000005545684,0.18459363,0.000038104554,0.00046328836,0.00008267904,0.000025071286,0.17670453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6317094,0.34006488,0.0004238331,0.003992591,0.0003076613,0.000080945996,0.00000762012,0.000022745799,0.023390299],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819714,0.00078811066,0.0002088161,0.00016104282,0.000120348006,0.00052452646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989131,0.0002758429,0.00006314817,0.000269993,0.000033449513,0.00044447527],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014167771,0.00013930677,0.00021127633,0.000019238114,0.0014202456,0.00014677709,0.0005456359,0.00012103333,0.0032102186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012752482,0.000115386894,0.00012297095,0.00031877166,0.0007427832,0.00012482805,0.000019687814,0.00024070365,0.0005424932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.4180925e-7,0.000029093106,0.0014766189,0.0009686615,0.00004175701,0.000016078306,0.010533208,0.000026942076,0.0000034607003,0.44760624,0.013057002,0.5262401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003808546,0.000008326492,0.0059035844,0.0013577177,0.00011077835,0.000026233927,0.0005709032,0.000030982774,0.000007648941,0.0066901734,0.9851167,0.00013885873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89010984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9216919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008729038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015413859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965932931","doi":"","title":"The Breach of the Standard of Care [Common Law Tort of Negligence] and the Concept of Fault in Personal Extracontractual Liability (Civil Law) in Canada: A Comparative Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Delict; Tort; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal liability; Liability; Common law; Political science; Personal injury; Reasonable person; Private law; Comparative law; Public law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.016762944335002212,"score_gpt":0.3204370153630276,"score_spread":0.3036740710280254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965932931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993118,0.0016706948,0.0000053497943,0.0012233354,0.000032776807,0.0004785809,0.00003835557,6.398799e-7,0.0034322557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973017,0.00019397911,0.0000016659857,0.000008137991,0.00002398421,0.000008212414,2.0222872e-7,0.0000024041929,0.000031227715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981568,0.0004269559,0.00041079917,0.000096498974,0.0004534178,0.00045551956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986457,0.00038489242,0.0005226573,0.00022171478,0.00019782627,0.000027171953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002498883,0.00007143887,0.00030389463,0.000008522344,0.0006420618,0.000023832687,0.0006198331,0.000030175626,0.0000036707804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008899731,0.000037530623,0.0000649333,0.000077845376,0.0014823693,0.000093923954,0.00006672356,0.00068002724,1.597458e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026523453,0.00009353331,0.07489226,0.000004976572,0.00005667008,2.0290355e-7,0.100878924,0.000055309014,0.00003537832,0.8219515,0.0000035738426,0.0017624407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021683446,0.0003509576,0.15867849,0.000057900867,0.0000512048,0.0000031014258,0.7952341,0.00007581258,0.00052758754,0.041775946,0.00097351347,0.00010306555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.898694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78017557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079671404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073614987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968742712","doi":"","title":"Good Faith in Contract: A Judicial Dialogue Between Common Law Canada and Québec","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Political science; Doctrine; Supreme court; Common law; Jurisdiction; Duty; Faith; High Court; Bad faith; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006972220576996508,"score_gpt":0.24953651394237716,"score_spread":0.24256429336538066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968742712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750665,0.00044836148,0.000021646345,0.006837311,0.00006398922,0.00016953975,0.000008827815,0.000009069086,0.017374765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858475,0.0002774124,0.0000037640136,0.00025380758,0.00033064137,0.0000036871559,0.0000025865802,0.0000071722434,0.0005361536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983062,0.00008881394,0.00018600219,0.000117756026,0.0002246927,0.0010764987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995774,0.00012536676,0.00008969431,0.0000748688,0.000027348644,0.00010531039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009495706,0.00007276062,0.00016058804,0.00002430539,0.00035051946,0.00006087367,0.00019656355,0.00005643502,0.000026445527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018797464,0.00006746017,0.000026928543,0.00011362115,0.000076761855,0.00013638817,0.000023843313,0.00095175765,0.0000086759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005609328,0.000013208412,0.21430306,9.934665e-7,0.000017893453,0.0000011998443,0.00070101407,0.0000032040841,0.000015227592,0.7805135,0.000028223649,0.0043968097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020970064,0.00023633256,0.26833352,0.000037877016,0.00005932612,0.000032585944,0.008331915,0.000028919474,0.00003142577,0.34407717,0.3762051,0.00052883907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99647045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43643638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014753462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00998785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969451865","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2019.21","title":"Contract Damages, Moral Agency, and Henry James’ <i>The Ambassadors</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Moral agency; Financial compensation; Agency cost; Law; Economics; Breach of contract; Actuarial science; Business; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019547925876030298,"score_gpt":0.28231352270139554,"score_spread":0.26276559682536527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969451865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8818167,0.0028676,0.00004907689,0.02364289,0.0005888486,0.0003065243,0.000030095322,0.000010169335,0.09068813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960434,0.00019689614,0.00012758684,0.0021192816,0.00028501483,0.0000021886037,5.2708145e-7,0.000008125339,0.001217011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989103,0.00011212045,0.0002502235,0.00012003856,0.00026500862,0.00034231792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869704,0.00014093911,0.00018991953,0.0001935381,0.0001636021,0.0006149483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086485647,0.00008727188,0.00015408071,0.00004087722,0.00063011545,0.00024566907,0.0005502704,0.00006983654,0.0002973839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007585099,0.000067401925,0.000070973714,0.00015781309,0.0005125229,0.00038791128,0.000018300052,0.00032796303,0.00005177701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000748884,0.000014956755,0.040085576,0.00001087304,0.000028160035,0.00009757422,0.00921796,0.000030320974,0.00034040012,0.93776745,0.0081032105,0.0042960206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017804012,0.000039890598,0.02899662,0.0000474608,0.000021965854,0.00003660977,0.00068664335,0.000013849347,0.00005132579,0.004195108,0.9656101,0.00012240747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13044585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20342803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9575069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001093687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00135269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8753446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970364905","doi":"","title":"Realizing Administrative Aboriginal Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.050475193050727896,"score_gpt":0.3829787923175869,"score_spread":0.332503599266859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970364905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029717835,0.000054936947,0.000103992345,0.007116233,0.00018853543,0.00021543448,0.00003504069,0.000100429235,0.96246755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884044,0.000051696075,0.00091281306,0.0007399304,0.0008278395,0.00004467932,0.000008723246,0.000010726,0.008999211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988789,0.000065945314,0.00016088321,0.00026268358,0.00029626052,0.00033532135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988478,0.00005564,0.00015397354,0.00056262803,0.000092272734,0.00028771846],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041633472,0.000103613595,0.0001300788,0.000009896311,0.003992135,0.0007715148,0.00068875094,0.00008923831,0.00042390657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008836659,0.000101221056,0.00007016116,0.00005505505,0.0006906631,0.00062704034,0.00005693054,0.00021532255,0.0005934243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004770081,0.0000256658,0.00083619705,0.000002838273,0.000007709726,0.0000059995036,0.00062212837,7.180383e-7,0.00016438472,0.9970876,0.0009930279,0.0002489338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015313594,0.00001823455,0.0023318704,0.000017217826,0.000010028594,7.323459e-7,0.0007491712,0.0000039914958,0.0003691051,0.019850165,0.9763555,0.00014083114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076058835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11741864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97723746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084051135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026874917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99730456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971261347","doi":"10.1093/ulr/unz030","title":"Identifying borrowed sources in secured transactions law reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Statute; Order (exchange); Business; Security interest; Law; Law and economics; Law reform; Work (physics); Uniform Commercial Code; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03014785700823235,"score_gpt":0.32824674827119976,"score_spread":0.2980988912629674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971261347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036668198,0.009884924,0.00022670862,0.0054062577,0.00014713194,0.001131347,0.000014376828,0.00010607715,0.9794164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97482324,0.018493108,0.00031704138,0.0024850953,0.00005568741,0.000073987205,0.0000128277325,0.000013084936,0.003725907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998968,0.000056230045,0.0002987494,0.00018062982,0.00023110665,0.00026528703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949616,0.000030187464,0.00008607186,0.0002566541,0.00004491138,0.00008603682],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065425097,0.000091256516,0.0002187528,0.000024389892,0.00036394,0.000072087474,0.00028524938,0.00006332963,0.00094330317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075133566,0.00007784226,0.00011190002,0.00040461015,0.000109197426,0.00041068523,0.00001579658,0.00017221484,0.00048011736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.064433e-7,0.000023470304,0.000021461849,0.00029285354,0.00000434459,5.1625113e-7,0.0010830871,0.0000022007573,0.000016393898,0.99707466,0.000025713536,0.0014545063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011326178,0.000006616691,0.000044894732,0.000762015,0.00001835959,8.768106e-7,0.00051950046,0.000011302051,0.000034783734,0.0026990906,0.99567205,0.00011724626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022881435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07134717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99564636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001831611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006531293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971747884","doi":"10.21991/cf29386","title":"Declarations of Invalidity in Superior Courts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Declaration; Statute; Political science; Plaintiff; Section (typography); Doctrine; Context (archaeology); History","score_opus":0.0271129156239343,"score_gpt":0.3023245000844432,"score_spread":0.2752115844605089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971747884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52443,0.0004937396,0.023290666,0.015560914,0.0018098594,0.0022297692,0.00072202616,0.00018947701,0.43127358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778354,0.000066638895,0.0008434958,0.000397825,0.00007125704,0.0000842246,0.000091568356,0.0000055358523,0.0006559098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979909,0.00009421163,0.00055224745,0.00035297495,0.0004946933,0.0005149377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988478,0.00021017868,0.00015392818,0.0003241168,0.00029489797,0.00016907185],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005522777,0.00016909333,0.00028986353,0.00021611548,0.00078388694,0.000063669955,0.00036830184,0.0001866426,0.000842227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034001912,0.0001791587,0.00015187972,0.0005276153,0.003795423,0.0007061515,0.000109080065,0.0002267794,0.00039668067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013370311,0.00012418546,0.10782136,0.0000100421685,0.000013202257,0.0000023737446,0.00028798534,0.0009107185,0.0006089376,0.88920087,0.00084935024,0.00015760362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019617204,0.000052771982,0.010221847,0.0001922764,0.00003605741,0.000027543349,0.008217001,0.0007320467,0.0009113334,0.06594939,0.91108584,0.00061219226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012446247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035503746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027174441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029975676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972200600","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW - COMPTE RENDU - INSIDE AND OUTSIDE CANADIAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF DAVID MULLAN","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.056731998102242595,"score_gpt":0.35143427343593686,"score_spread":0.29470227533369425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972200600","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012427529,0.6503359,0.0000010218656,0.10843599,0.000030766554,0.001111247,0.00008782012,0.000007913191,0.23986506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29065546,0.5916518,0.000065939785,0.11541671,0.00008643149,0.000051838808,0.000025539903,0.000016926091,0.0020293733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856013,0.00024938048,0.00040221933,0.00018582845,0.00016674315,0.00043568475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986139,0.00012394255,0.00013067824,0.0003131915,0.0000761534,0.00074212404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023587605,0.00011898047,0.00034585973,0.000058282236,0.00054439245,0.000030116458,0.00036081535,0.000059161233,0.00059602177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022277566,0.000095873096,0.000058403795,0.000347914,0.00034831377,0.00008932492,0.000020131529,0.00023899897,0.000053110976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015247533,0.000012103033,0.0005021655,0.0016080654,0.000022380269,0.00006180773,0.002505723,3.7532453e-7,0.0000017871458,0.8221614,0.15826331,0.014859361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047822054,0.000008029305,0.0017337813,0.0037512528,0.00003371852,0.0000058165906,0.00013407803,5.5076356e-7,0.0000023884645,0.00039770323,0.99377173,0.00011311592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8355084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004068756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020371445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6526021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972206043","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3432330","title":"Loser Takes All: Multiple Claimants &amp;amp; Probabilistic Restitution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Probabilistic logic; Unjust enrichment; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.03329714907493829,"score_gpt":0.3206020554070611,"score_spread":0.2873049063321228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972206043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556063,0.00074774964,0.0062216483,0.0057841283,0.0003911634,0.0006547501,0.000006663544,0.000106854015,0.030480742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98137885,0.00080910523,0.0003334556,0.00013041883,0.00042535266,0.000014327088,0.000010092026,0.000013998678,0.016884383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740875,0.00013143757,0.00024057961,0.0002182883,0.00039508918,0.0016058675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928147,0.00008974664,0.00014679076,0.00022553933,0.00012737281,0.000129111],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017388812,0.00011250145,0.0001318262,0.00005494113,0.00062492,0.00013731977,0.00037884485,0.00009722372,0.00021578555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028749937,0.00009910633,0.00009472688,0.00021113905,0.00013059747,0.00031815577,0.000025463618,0.0010190493,0.0014679059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025399971,0.00009727756,0.008489036,0.000006170616,0.000044562887,4.0905775e-7,0.0012624415,0.00022627058,0.0009579119,0.98574126,0.0005717164,0.00257753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043926178,0.000039015442,0.0018981613,0.000018210952,0.000026845471,0.000027820735,0.0013599247,0.00005826061,0.000011168089,0.2296981,0.7662225,0.00020074596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001506944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062163293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76565075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010675595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022334743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975404603","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v35i1.5632","title":"\"Vexatious and an Abuse of the Process of the Court\": The Assets Company v Mere Roihi Cases","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kensington Health","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Certainty; Publishing; Law; Project commissioning; High Court; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020904804518232796,"score_gpt":0.2892961959220668,"score_spread":0.268391391403834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975404603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9649066,0.0065840026,0.00006329735,0.006216452,0.0002002483,0.0014199094,0.00007151642,0.000024177436,0.020513808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868532,0.012902512,0.000055519966,0.000080645754,0.000029764205,4.2833904e-7,9.923664e-7,0.0000030883416,0.0000738763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999264,0.00013711298,0.00014388813,0.00010736814,0.00026011607,0.00008753063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991014,0.00008324447,0.00030951467,0.00030060022,0.00016718233,0.000038068534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035112927,0.000062879364,0.00017822042,0.0000066363627,0.0005585724,0.000008510907,0.00061559456,0.000037313424,0.000016128863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020517538,0.000036451245,0.00008562495,0.00029867544,0.0006686567,0.000096899494,0.00004706953,0.00008537314,0.0000011046179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064679157,0.00014297431,0.0012810951,0.0007489901,0.000037128084,4.7408906e-7,0.00971667,0.00014155866,0.000080531565,0.9874475,0.00015084416,0.00024577737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033672614,0.000030074529,0.0032252143,0.0017570175,0.0003265095,0.0000023132784,0.002793982,0.000010827778,0.00050182175,0.0032497062,0.9876395,0.00012631963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005800572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006426693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002520575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001132286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8768769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976602630","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198747963.003.0002","title":"2. Some Advice for the Novice Tort Lawyer","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Damages; Law; Criticism; Liability; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0343875519503604,"score_gpt":0.2579262848627683,"score_spread":0.22353873291240792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976602630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000952837,0.00010511491,0.00022061652,0.0005690451,0.00023063853,0.0010925835,0.0002446371,0.00011073353,0.9974171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00052897714,0.00040168353,0.00015006647,0.0002841103,0.0005881095,0.0000039445504,0.000017290684,0.000024974912,0.99800086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905306,0.000017802362,0.00010864979,0.0003026697,0.00026171913,0.00025609627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988702,0.00027991825,0.00016163167,0.00044267505,0.00015200535,0.00009355665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018374225,0.00016994121,0.00018161506,0.000035494548,0.00094524765,0.00007473718,0.00084270205,0.00027867634,0.000062794876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008082463,0.00015372221,0.00020483573,0.0000072686407,0.0002511714,0.0001262653,0.00022566193,0.00024887305,0.000011100726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023198007,0.000004559843,9.3842664e-7,0.000018851722,0.000058967493,0.0000013216209,0.0006206564,0.000004266286,0.0000016907776,0.99079925,0.0062643723,0.002201936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021221128,0.000014246488,0.000004797022,0.000022720675,0.00015638373,2.1886733e-7,0.00026679132,0.000038989485,0.0000034982218,0.0022033278,0.99686915,0.00020765633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013121746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011311063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99060476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015318343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031316734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72701764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976991538","doi":"10.5539/ass.v15n10p141","title":"Theoretical Research on the Principle of Equality in Civil Law from the Perspective of Civil Society","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Assertion; Interpretation (philosophy); Contradiction; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Mathematics; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07564707056488372,"score_gpt":0.43063679981141734,"score_spread":0.3549897292465336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976991538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2433988,0.000011174974,0.000011641264,0.022899237,0.000042323223,0.00038561557,0.00002426704,0.000007731429,0.7332192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939173,0.00000804437,0.000026477315,0.00030835212,0.00013020662,0.000018209597,4.1800465e-7,0.0000038888934,0.00011269097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971406,0.0005963405,0.00020185397,0.000304586,0.0013597712,0.00039688367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979716,0.0011861238,0.00010161885,0.00034691143,0.00033763345,0.000056130357],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008012664,0.000064239095,0.00013628641,0.000019277002,0.0012814793,0.000072325136,0.0013175257,0.000075953845,0.00052851305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051279564,0.000038745362,0.000106211795,0.001573954,0.01075887,0.00013623547,0.000277167,0.00038971347,0.00003068745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005979958,0.000064474894,0.000851761,0.0000012866544,0.0000033307238,4.3782975e-8,0.06402276,4.6872987e-7,0.0007263943,0.9340121,0.00008760273,0.00022377813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015001255,0.000041945048,0.06439774,0.000024200897,0.000003936289,2.764147e-8,0.1627484,0.000038934435,0.0009351235,0.7581277,0.013439211,0.00009277501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011256379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010241387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7559929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028913486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065468944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977012254","doi":"10.25167/osap.1279","title":"Rediscovering Blackstone: wpływ Williama Blackstone’a na rozwój amerykańskiej nauki prawa w recepcji Alberta W. Alschulera","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Opole Studies in Administration and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sovereignty; Common law; State (computer science); Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.0797856984515944,"score_gpt":0.4311742898990793,"score_spread":0.3513885914474849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977012254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3473205,0.00078065344,0.000042909283,0.06863357,0.0007066047,0.0008560783,0.000023838613,0.00006593273,0.5815699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98731095,0.0017480231,0.00011032053,0.00054333726,0.0003627127,0.00007328518,0.0000050030912,0.000012702092,0.009833644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986497,0.00011779712,0.00031331318,0.00031771473,0.000275978,0.00032549628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881643,0.000242944,0.00024441752,0.0005310129,0.0000672395,0.00009795839],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067931425,0.00016640054,0.00023352541,0.00002238902,0.0036400985,0.0004220265,0.00046579566,0.00008189651,0.0000556192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038101783,0.00012943294,0.00005544606,0.00009960457,0.0027195604,0.00046048337,0.00022336935,0.00021299874,0.00003804327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034893288,0.000069229405,0.0016045803,0.000020995692,0.000049883038,0.0000037492036,0.016799398,0.00000835785,0.00008238801,0.97803175,0.0016056632,0.0016890785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008269811,0.0001538985,0.007961889,0.00017369301,0.00006141084,0.000007944197,0.048032664,0.00015125512,0.00084740523,0.0181541,0.9230808,0.0005479732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008555934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08434098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95987767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007721144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011769631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977097792","doi":"","title":"Legal unreasonableness: Life after 'Li'","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AIAL Forum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Rationality; Political science; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Citizenship; Immigration; Administrative law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03318271763834884,"score_gpt":0.316296108130545,"score_spread":0.28311339049219614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977097792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18650362,0.00046939423,0.001669031,0.08236329,0.0015563751,0.0004834709,0.00003119617,0.00028212275,0.7266415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985348,0.000010955307,0.00018701461,0.001632469,0.0006464037,0.000054556,0.000003626811,0.000007874796,0.012109139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991648,0.00003875417,0.00009858455,0.00013552443,0.000256724,0.00030560355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994307,0.000024875078,0.000027733096,0.00014318674,0.000077056415,0.0002964591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026147132,0.000059957783,0.000074690295,0.000017724511,0.00024760826,0.00010478723,0.00019076516,0.00006330033,0.00018388961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014903116,0.00005503228,0.000045347602,0.00016161817,0.00010840804,0.00027765142,0.000068927635,0.00007039392,0.0006055715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029070026,0.000047186684,0.0072181015,0.0000017845989,0.000007766457,0.0000042816023,0.0016666311,0.000017069828,0.0000065910667,0.9238155,0.06479262,0.0023934252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014637919,0.000015243149,0.0009606717,0.0000029645203,0.0000053207505,3.3243248e-7,0.0019896228,0.00003125559,0.000012086163,0.0058437125,0.9909068,0.00008565418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008890568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047949133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92611414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057982037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004290037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99770933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978097176","doi":"","title":"One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Unjust Enrichment In The Supreme Court Of Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Law; Political science; Restitution","score_opus":0.08300298807878627,"score_gpt":0.3241017000889317,"score_spread":0.24109871201014543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978097176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98776877,0.000039706174,0.00046504918,0.0040773754,0.00010542902,0.000550861,0.000048209924,0.000025970028,0.0069186515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647224,0.000046855017,0.000084288724,0.00044786267,0.0000802006,0.00000258582,0.000010464034,0.000013231275,0.0028422538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781644,0.00029470224,0.00027308086,0.00033498957,0.00077432214,0.00050646026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988856,0.00012866978,0.00018059666,0.00046343677,0.00014606371,0.00019566213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007789453,0.00016755085,0.00023773233,0.00014809913,0.00045045794,0.0001272301,0.0012045591,0.00009645303,0.000045390927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003430897,0.00016932054,0.000083323095,0.0007596794,0.00020050521,0.0007919697,0.00017838474,0.00039061866,0.000041081363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005487559,0.00038606656,0.95316523,0.00004395811,0.00006139635,0.000071960676,0.006429923,0.0004950293,0.00023061449,0.038600784,0.0000072582484,0.00045289518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022783002,0.000086505606,0.9145958,0.00015168842,0.000080032005,0.0000031976228,0.012120632,2.5385538e-7,0.0005026099,0.001334643,0.06842255,0.00042380363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09395754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96797943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8740219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008806955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012196404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9120759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978927328","doi":"10.29173/alr2565","title":"The Devil is in the Scale: Revisiting the Commonality Requirement in Charter Class Actions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada); University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Charter; Normative; Law and economics; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Complementarity (molecular biology); Class (philosophy); Redress; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06221157356095968,"score_gpt":0.3734815764382308,"score_spread":0.31127000287727113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978927328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012530067,0.012594812,0.0000015294152,0.5577455,0.000074999494,0.0016389628,0.0000032721405,0.0000073594606,0.41540352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94869995,0.023680042,0.0000061901837,0.025442988,0.00015193445,0.0002739996,0.000003346521,0.0000059838007,0.0017355598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833924,0.00063554896,0.0003389628,0.0001664286,0.00027501304,0.0002447996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981533,0.0010973772,0.00011686627,0.0005691565,0.000035060464,0.000028199716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003121625,0.00007988548,0.00015496377,0.0000050835597,0.00076618517,0.000121921374,0.0006648185,0.000031852396,0.0002339007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010747205,0.000037292793,0.000090761496,0.00040828923,0.00017038456,0.00013017292,0.00006904983,0.00024043089,0.00031733688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.831999e-7,0.000016326314,0.0032156599,0.000083794395,0.0000048152588,1.1023092e-7,0.0019996073,2.7831106e-7,0.0000025050424,0.98059344,0.0024040337,0.011678762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004375158,0.0000025808242,0.0042644413,0.00052010047,0.000013746932,5.606786e-7,0.0005527586,0.000011132603,0.0000011098009,0.00082124013,0.9937118,0.000056733024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02838382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15907443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007357085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005472892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97808623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979164139","doi":"","title":"Right-to-Farm Legislation in Canada: Exceptional Protection for Standard Farm Practices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Legislation; Legislature; Business; Legitimacy; Liability; Political science; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.027549898197143943,"score_gpt":0.32496860151908497,"score_spread":0.29741870332194104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979164139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77790654,0.0002529312,0.15498668,0.04465746,0.00080079003,0.0021161311,0.00003846241,0.00005201976,0.019189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967621,0.00013613068,0.00033751436,0.00012780218,0.0013655205,0.00007807232,0.000002794859,0.000008821738,0.0011812407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981126,0.00008972011,0.00021301261,0.00016158783,0.0003817502,0.0010413099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992519,0.000053299846,0.0002753897,0.00007281604,0.00025902656,0.000087551736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020657105,0.000073212315,0.00008941431,0.000075195814,0.0008938735,0.00008879134,0.00018597716,0.000046156238,0.0000575184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002720776,0.00006864038,0.00003529453,0.00028302515,0.00004706538,0.00020831788,0.000013721288,0.0005268389,0.000010904904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024231379,0.0000522748,0.0036614046,0.0000037120044,0.00004252252,5.604273e-7,0.0018282346,0.000110814304,0.000862037,0.90937006,0.00028910837,0.08353695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055486703,0.0003054395,0.0034803397,0.000013890163,0.000015379475,0.000013571805,0.005782244,0.00019024938,0.00022259905,0.18763243,0.80161095,0.0001780278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68563783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80132186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005716333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017511431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979357697","doi":"","title":"Professor Mary Condon appointed Dean of Osgoode Hall Law School for a four-year term commencing July 1","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Law; Political science; History; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.04092394794608251,"score_gpt":0.32998182646082397,"score_spread":0.28905787851474146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979357697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12849353,0.0000131759725,0.0012631648,0.006062639,0.00011999959,0.0019555353,0.000043815377,0.000104541105,0.8619436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812703,0.0000039898086,0.0029678766,0.0008069546,0.00007957346,0.00008317668,0.0000101348,0.000010785669,0.014767174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999178,0.000052994033,0.00020417008,0.00016652785,0.00016599374,0.00023229246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992989,0.00017933705,0.00010020259,0.00020888718,0.000113897884,0.000098826844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004449714,0.000072700714,0.00014911336,0.000023270946,0.0002290656,0.00004055834,0.0002610358,0.00006822987,0.0003416629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005677661,0.00006321008,0.000076650744,0.000104182924,0.0000913976,0.00016027867,0.000064193686,0.00009768763,0.0001786788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022337586,0.000053481486,0.0021480005,0.000050630875,0.000016455917,1.2803591e-7,0.0009683707,0.0000015966574,0.0039000893,0.9888097,0.0037700627,0.00025912988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005126297,0.00041312532,0.007931311,0.00030005997,0.000111368805,0.0000017192215,0.019097054,0.0010097824,0.01543401,0.09335241,0.856298,0.0009248314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008323306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010069933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8954573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005569568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013346274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979538973","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2019.67.3.fazel","title":"Suing the Canada Revenue Agency in Tort","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; Audit; Agency (philosophy); Law; Parliament; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.012001390883941039,"score_gpt":0.21664451106592375,"score_spread":0.20464312018198272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979538973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82543373,0.00035539275,0.000008378814,0.118314445,0.0013673212,0.00045600653,0.00026642345,0.000007731812,0.053790588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93013185,0.000078808764,0.0000413279,0.0012199014,0.0006538863,0.000019648704,0.0000066890566,0.000018324006,0.06782959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808633,0.0001454991,0.00031657735,0.00022409469,0.00017373837,0.0010537318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979732,0.000107882755,0.00014366626,0.000352703,0.000113064125,0.0013094594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010330067,0.00012828907,0.0001837763,0.00013792861,0.0008829432,0.00014047069,0.00075351313,0.000102229955,0.00080378697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000290523,0.000118824864,0.00006813486,0.0005859689,0.00008255712,0.00016841367,0.000022816703,0.00061777816,0.000049984617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000082369315,0.000028069626,0.17796203,0.000050283015,0.00006898179,0.0012012899,0.038015008,0.0015574406,0.00012457855,0.057341166,0.70247424,0.021168657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011644034,0.0000081729095,0.029175807,0.00004954589,0.0000073745973,0.000048197166,0.0025166038,0.00006785099,0.0000028813702,0.0010667137,0.96676433,0.00017607746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99920577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26429006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035449609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00631849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980150858","doi":"","title":"The Good Faith Challenge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Fair dealing; Nothing; Rhetoric; Commonwealth; Political science; Form of the Good; Caveat emptor; Sociology; Law and economics; Good faith; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.009450958780894417,"score_gpt":0.2777368638650274,"score_spread":0.26828590508413297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980150858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22840372,0.006824889,0.0009253614,0.084184006,0.00058569317,0.00049230887,0.0000018336071,0.00008315325,0.67849904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96067464,0.010333557,0.00000874049,0.000064008054,0.0004354137,0.000005177628,2.5542482e-7,0.0000067566198,0.028471442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811345,0.00007813341,0.0001093111,0.000089000474,0.0002519483,0.0013581715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961,0.0000735076,0.000073529685,0.00013189671,0.000049754195,0.00006130426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019148851,0.000051985007,0.00005627103,0.000014136243,0.001158814,0.00012384451,0.00040675473,0.000039772985,0.00006374857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028151782,0.000033769044,0.00006388043,0.00011007094,0.00006428687,0.0001223011,0.000025210182,0.000885103,0.00038102057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025726163,0.000012584902,0.00040328404,2.8507486e-7,0.000016905242,9.150147e-8,0.00060684665,0.000002050173,0.0000125524175,0.9831704,0.00007410464,0.01569835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011779096,0.00004991738,0.0002827626,0.0000020263503,0.000004584296,0.0000059588697,0.009580651,0.000008823961,0.000002721045,0.31357166,0.67631996,0.000053163832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034457617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015461143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73227096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000420604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017181471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89127773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985602801","doi":"10.29173/jaed333","title":"Property, Information And Institutional Design","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Private property; Political science; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.019020082287431687,"score_gpt":0.27803120117371444,"score_spread":0.25901111888628275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985602801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8889614,0.00013322257,0.02673142,0.013132194,0.0007350562,0.00064272224,0.000002329213,0.000024063671,0.06963761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411029,0.00031757716,0.05732213,0.00028559854,0.0002323532,0.00002169787,0.0000011820888,0.000002852642,0.0007137029],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994149,0.000019616966,0.00031983998,0.000038580252,0.0001056957,0.00010132648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999533,0.000022943559,0.00019456497,0.000029182198,0.0001123709,0.00010795555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005120019,0.000046115834,0.000077953526,0.00006421715,0.00026189562,0.00015415948,0.00011396365,0.000026913553,0.00020913895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013221535,0.00003233341,0.000015940985,0.000032827564,0.00007463276,0.0012864885,0.000011438359,0.000068494606,0.0002562411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005746727,0.00011376549,0.010717738,0.000030580744,0.0001859532,0.0000037367768,0.02602213,0.0025411546,0.00011784685,0.37125486,0.031854775,0.5571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016261595,0.000014825451,0.0129965255,0.00001036297,0.0000030457652,0.0000111802865,0.00033444975,0.00011042833,0.00006269075,0.00074683985,0.98548836,0.000058700673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003796372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042472373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95363355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003073658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020161162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35765037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989376111","doi":"","title":"Dunsmuir and Jurisdiction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Deference; Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Standard of review; Judicial review; Key (lock); Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.009958624161173116,"score_gpt":0.2975966712047965,"score_spread":0.2876380470436234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989376111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8622317,0.0011734937,0.011513511,0.015108399,0.0002900308,0.00014775358,0.0000012446275,0.000076341115,0.10945753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911909,0.0030190838,0.00005838194,0.000098215096,0.0012130671,0.0000020496777,2.5548732e-7,0.000004341453,0.004413671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988749,0.000041939667,0.000080071135,0.000078080244,0.00013033945,0.00079466344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999759,0.000014654152,0.00004485587,0.000050461214,0.00006303863,0.00006794421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010535284,0.000037672628,0.00004157845,0.000027814636,0.0009821618,0.00006930483,0.000097859585,0.00003703063,0.000049515318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028069135,0.00003325008,0.000022145176,0.00010992964,0.00016706188,0.00014723782,0.000014085725,0.00040665834,0.000056909048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035032842,0.000009378762,0.0007438529,2.3814925e-7,0.00000983627,9.983325e-8,0.0013820675,1.1592573e-7,0.0000889169,0.9732178,0.00017765124,0.024366532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016175295,0.00010648671,0.0017591716,0.0000030970461,0.00001161655,0.00003448914,0.005341909,0.000020735855,0.00003612779,0.45902136,0.5334287,0.00007452242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005268769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008560299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5332511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024587658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008929789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7554094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989922706","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19890443","title":"Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Collateral; Legislature; Law; Statutory law; Legislative intent; Political science; Law and economics; Entitlement (fair division); Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory interpretation; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06463917718911977,"score_gpt":0.39831135338932117,"score_spread":0.3336721762002014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989922706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14989652,0.040400527,0.000026408294,0.088894896,0.00023786153,0.0036095,0.000012508388,0.00003247193,0.7168893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906438,0.0054521346,0.00008055309,0.0034151203,0.000048691763,0.00010808593,0.0000031870604,0.000003606316,0.0002448317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988111,0.00048413253,0.00023090994,0.000101252255,0.00025137397,0.00012122144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942183,0.00020507672,0.0001161552,0.00019409719,0.000047830887,0.00001502926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017986483,0.00005147217,0.00012905522,0.000004266665,0.00024389994,0.000050671017,0.0002765357,0.000023484119,0.00021626131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052078463,0.000028194263,0.00005911241,0.00013500356,0.000076877455,0.000110362074,0.000029010638,0.00015233556,0.000058928883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005833765,0.00003304637,0.00029248252,0.00035425092,0.000006378887,2.4044652e-7,0.012907604,0.000010951232,0.000011129528,0.95616394,0.00062400225,0.029590167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001464254,0.00008958552,0.0015572974,0.0015762444,0.00001808728,3.0263706e-7,0.0019452674,0.00027983505,0.000002928271,0.004169019,0.99011475,0.00010023641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026354874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004974957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98949075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034717734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007533624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3984086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990169632","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttz091","title":"Comparing the institutional constructive trust with the remedial constructive trust","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Remedial education; Constructive; State (computer science); Supreme court; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Sociology; High Court; Computer science","score_opus":0.020610184791982206,"score_gpt":0.2680394680347634,"score_spread":0.2474292832427812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990169632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534392,0.00006472333,0.000114708775,0.0054075043,0.0004145451,0.0009954389,0.000025461753,0.000101611484,0.23943685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962601,0.000026004158,0.0003413824,0.00042447407,0.00064286304,0.00011201265,0.000010633726,0.000019078036,0.0021634297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977371,0.00024715907,0.00028987628,0.00043163993,0.0007622794,0.0005319107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984541,0.00045818475,0.00022816421,0.00049521134,0.0002200588,0.00014429179],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063531636,0.0002490985,0.0003051687,0.000056960085,0.0022272426,0.00028141183,0.00085975265,0.00012541759,0.0007461614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008767991,0.00013856431,0.00011686539,0.00046021378,0.0035083478,0.00040801353,0.0001408541,0.0005285071,0.00028902406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011168565,0.00004109074,0.09017087,0.00000653148,0.00009986437,0.0000037091615,0.010682719,0.00030288915,0.000062782776,0.89570695,0.00046761244,0.002343284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033545566,0.00016182614,0.23344076,0.00009474996,0.00024363406,0.00011510059,0.10776543,0.0012636272,0.00044714534,0.009051239,0.64311755,0.0009443858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017823747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049074986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88665575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021703461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007299853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990653933","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.14","title":"Civil and Common Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Perspective (graphical); Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Public law; Commercial law; Common law; Order (exchange); Comparative law; Conflict of laws; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.052766210166897885,"score_gpt":0.332534001411051,"score_spread":0.27976779124415313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990653933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019646604,0.0008764488,0.00003574854,0.009827463,0.00010549585,0.00016602364,0.000059505495,0.000088522305,0.98882115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1562868,0.08884173,0.00030059883,0.0058614393,0.0024184412,0.000060764472,0.00018644512,0.000031657037,0.74601215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929607,0.000044625325,0.000109236644,0.00019513867,0.00020178304,0.0001531625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995898,0.00007017424,0.00004805646,0.0001175959,0.000023172945,0.00015119709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008344378,0.00008903977,0.00016738298,0.000011125785,0.00040907957,0.00013936941,0.00020994189,0.0001831408,0.0006864781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011180818,0.00007594177,0.00003977456,0.0000914112,0.00019967202,0.000051198276,0.00011209365,0.0002446422,0.00015766373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.9550628e-7,0.0000066521925,0.00001966627,0.000017643091,0.0000060711095,6.2972634e-7,0.0005255125,3.1377425e-8,4.6941015e-8,0.77008617,0.2219405,0.00739667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003465164,0.000005878114,0.000029002738,0.000022038139,0.000014278026,1.4462013e-7,0.00034656996,0.00000404179,7.6171204e-7,0.010201218,0.98923904,0.000102387094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017642112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079924226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7672985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032886874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014603986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98889947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991662242","doi":"10.3138/utlj.69.s1.007","title":"Remedies for violations of Indigenous peoples’ human rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Political science; Indigenous rights; Reservation of rights; Law; Indigenous; Fundamental rights; Jurisprudence; Right to property; International law; Rights of Nature; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013313868627646528,"score_gpt":0.2696257006686968,"score_spread":0.25631183204105024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991662242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7723239,0.00010321793,0.0007396561,0.00022539297,0.000101684294,0.000256194,0.000028468252,0.000010755504,0.2262107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624366,0.00003903516,0.0012828594,0.000004840616,0.00006934193,6.817301e-8,0.0000023066661,0.0000017510469,0.0023561406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958384,0.00002734975,0.000089507324,0.00005560451,0.00013967538,0.00010403795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994685,0.00005708995,0.00015557343,0.000075723,0.00018376148,0.000059370454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018989657,0.000032700613,0.00009624372,0.000011614362,0.0013748603,0.000010576764,0.00021807423,0.000039413404,0.0006582473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000057059083,0.000034201104,0.000084076055,0.000019752999,0.00012682067,0.0002588201,0.00002177862,0.00004295886,0.0000036888373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015092521,0.00006638342,0.0030560195,0.000011908737,0.000037094174,4.0950363e-7,0.043553583,0.000014746678,0.000842822,0.9517817,0.00044605703,0.00017418733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084757555,0.00016928611,0.016436908,0.000049846753,0.00006881567,0.0000016307537,0.04155376,0.00001554238,0.00021888228,0.009475791,0.9310239,0.00013805418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15998268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7113073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013684528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076493685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993216637","doi":"","title":"Ownership defined differently in civil, canon law.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Canon; Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04555882821101389,"score_gpt":0.2737149462309448,"score_spread":0.22815611801993088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993216637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31533527,0.00008218259,0.00002356321,0.023801086,0.00008716425,0.0005870822,0.000004562561,0.000088960296,0.65999013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99564576,0.000016259428,0.000024552688,0.0008780549,0.00013021797,0.00028810187,0.000002803505,0.0000031674736,0.0030110946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992188,0.000055628385,0.00010385317,0.00013093089,0.0001525466,0.0003382071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967927,0.00004758438,0.000028863711,0.000113388305,0.000014894227,0.00011599099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003132937,0.00005140493,0.000074962714,0.000030028594,0.00015593914,0.00006126438,0.00017687431,0.000049533126,0.000031805354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007814045,0.00004500102,0.000029111288,0.00022423678,0.00005749857,0.00008969493,0.000012840195,0.00008170497,0.000021100419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044272338,0.0000675305,0.0046165255,0.0000011866321,0.0000016102495,0.0000012412661,0.001123328,0.0000021357753,0.000011935003,0.93023884,0.00055740797,0.06337381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019665646,0.0000043142645,0.7645723,0.0000021667288,0.000003606583,1.09567004e-7,0.00019081763,0.000004372524,0.000050206185,0.033144284,0.20173146,0.000099686105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004268983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06291698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89709455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010275864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032468102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9541823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995168884","doi":"","title":"New Wine in Old Bottles: Corrupt Contracts in Canadian Private Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Political science; Criminal law; Jurisdiction; Language change; Private law; Conviction; Common law; Damages; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Comparative law; Legislation; Conflict of laws; Liability","score_opus":0.020152140986178475,"score_gpt":0.29844053848218194,"score_spread":0.2782883974960035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995168884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7494549,0.0026875078,0.00066335674,0.08317223,0.0004529283,0.0006838392,0.000007498219,0.000050792783,0.1628269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475396,0.00043375988,0.00007259926,0.000490095,0.00048239052,0.000003974217,0.0000017932451,0.000009160873,0.003752282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727046,0.000087139844,0.00022055644,0.00012494564,0.00022594216,0.0020709313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991939,0.000029632303,0.00007049152,0.000097890465,0.000044732904,0.00056334405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023039915,0.00007864869,0.00012379314,0.000106210144,0.00018970939,0.0000927466,0.00031344238,0.00008171718,0.000034121927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013411081,0.00007697438,0.00003180259,0.0003498073,0.000055639564,0.00025710938,0.000014461615,0.001058035,0.00005602634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069107664,0.000017679087,0.007213421,3.0460794e-7,0.000005092342,0.000006658787,0.001659561,0.000056689543,0.000014945672,0.9885292,0.0002669654,0.0022225508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093284965,0.000054150554,0.003885989,0.000018113067,0.0000049477685,0.000021069563,0.0036816131,0.000040302984,0.000008275726,0.3064163,0.68478763,0.00014871322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8977312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99673647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6845207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035217807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014423278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995463940","doi":"10.1002/iir.1355","title":"The origins and development of the office of registrar in bankruptcy of the High Court","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Jurisdiction; Law; Creditor; Work (physics); Officer; Business; Political science; Finance; Debt; Engineering","score_opus":0.030677726483000146,"score_gpt":0.3332561482040271,"score_spread":0.30257842172102695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995463940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87775767,0.020948734,0.00003724581,0.03409992,0.00079987576,0.0016082005,0.000048313606,0.000007559304,0.0646925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882208,0.010778508,0.00013341536,0.00012651189,0.000017761147,0.000014979199,9.274256e-7,0.0000022421837,0.0007048201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991279,0.000065527995,0.00034777154,0.00007607876,0.00032052404,0.00006214365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992439,0.00012619693,0.0002945678,0.00019183711,0.00013207008,0.000011420378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006296487,0.00004155084,0.00010864967,0.000009540493,0.000083430656,0.0000070484075,0.0006143398,0.00001962144,0.00006624228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001415485,0.000020688,0.00004912168,0.00016776501,0.00017279833,0.000045947196,0.000091719245,0.00007146878,0.0000046133828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040675054,0.000081584214,0.021997103,0.0002644493,0.000029377625,4.7061494e-8,0.0013988101,0.000006512272,0.00026579158,0.9643799,0.0005830171,0.010989312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069440524,0.000003508189,0.0807094,0.00094288454,0.0000063247367,2.6992691e-7,0.00012551018,0.000004682214,0.00025818968,0.0007942158,0.91705453,0.000031023927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090482476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012222514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96358573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053329935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027728363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13678303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995607031","doi":"10.1561/109.00000023","title":"Do Corporate Fiduciary Duties Matter?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Corporate Governance","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.11840524044959469,"score_gpt":0.331441662935097,"score_spread":0.21303642248550234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995607031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8163641,0.0005656163,0.00003125943,0.010959439,0.00025734396,0.00028721115,0.0001199445,0.000040776074,0.17137428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97329575,0.0007279576,0.00012725322,0.0011141658,0.000121033096,0.0000134624315,0.000006386678,0.000013190557,0.02458081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869233,0.00007228689,0.00028358935,0.00024902317,0.00040631724,0.00029645147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980628,0.000063310115,0.0011438717,0.000377982,0.00025951417,0.000092514616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048144406,0.00011672836,0.00021749698,0.00002077527,0.00015568464,0.000066898894,0.00042538412,0.00007589359,0.0011343628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038878465,0.000114193215,0.00008946491,0.0003487819,0.00023862995,0.00037062218,0.0000724598,0.000110268295,0.001633514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030792376,0.00007017702,0.09756848,0.00003264653,0.000020062202,0.000002906378,0.00090673333,0.00007239198,0.00063757616,0.8431633,0.05598465,0.0015102813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002348464,0.000061715546,0.22650078,0.00010240654,0.000008707675,9.496756e-7,0.00056749454,0.000033987908,0.0039735907,0.10731286,0.6608561,0.00034653733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013052134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027974453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73585045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019224195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002137999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995886345","doi":"10.29173/alr2600","title":"Sealed and Delivered: A Theory of Unilateral Transfer at Common Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Law; Common law; Transfer (computing); Seal (emblem); Reading (process); Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.03760485368143334,"score_gpt":0.3021664233771204,"score_spread":0.26456156969568706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995886345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13163596,0.049995705,0.000036214748,0.08867615,0.000040092043,0.0015775596,0.000035685647,0.000049009413,0.7279536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695938,0.016724823,0.000022292183,0.013013007,0.000028231936,0.000016442475,0.000007501459,0.000006117562,0.00058773864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931574,0.00016262049,0.00017737456,0.00012918827,0.00010098412,0.000114067996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999536,0.00017963088,0.000027923079,0.00011621032,0.000025205114,0.000115062016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020403252,0.000064289394,0.00021307547,0.000002176968,0.00020446333,0.000012836898,0.00014594586,0.000032570726,0.00041743412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016227346,0.0000522089,0.00006409792,0.00010267359,0.00024833853,0.000077517165,0.000041269654,0.000054810953,0.000044475077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044528174,0.00000941538,0.000092232774,0.00030287803,0.000010046735,3.5756227e-7,0.0015200626,1.339534e-7,0.00004228035,0.9966991,0.00020342834,0.0011156286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010672756,0.000017324766,0.00006712746,0.00024438472,0.00006317643,6.245874e-7,0.000035171524,0.0000046304026,0.000071457835,0.0024311747,0.99688375,0.00007445359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013774714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03707248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012280631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017353414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99279267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998950605","doi":"10.1515/jetl-2019-0121","title":"Simplifying the Complexities of Negligence Law – A Joint Academic/Judicial Proposal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Tort Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Causation; Res ipsa loquitur; Harm; Element (criminal law); Law; Duty; Meaning (existential); Duty of care; Tort; Contributory negligence; Liability; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13973243807535826,"score_gpt":0.34262262706459734,"score_spread":0.20289018898923908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998950605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04480327,0.00044461127,0.0013234185,0.04998435,0.0003210629,0.00032886022,0.000020767548,0.000041544783,0.90273213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99389195,0.00006165473,0.0004515616,0.0034675838,0.002034317,5.6122076e-7,3.6153358e-7,0.000011330536,0.00008064776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985552,0.00026531392,0.00050938997,0.000085601845,0.00041761194,0.00016687707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905217,0.00006385393,0.00048744105,0.00009354708,0.0001774513,0.0001255278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097128004,0.00007152493,0.00017050753,0.000012189205,0.00048844586,0.000059590886,0.00055133185,0.000026263482,0.0000578126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012202723,0.00004864476,0.00012196601,0.00014019187,0.00063932023,0.00020355679,0.00011311951,0.00038116437,0.000021481428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014519471,0.000014822733,0.000078750556,0.000007766436,0.000015793397,0.000008858195,0.007891438,0.000046041416,0.0028655054,0.98657596,0.002218424,0.00026212516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016375186,0.00012863682,0.00093136873,0.00005797744,0.000036487483,0.000008565035,0.004269832,0.000030214156,0.00090961746,0.0077037434,0.98565555,0.00010424091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044948902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018759171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9834371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000275104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015433544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37567803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999271827","doi":"","title":"Rights, Wrongs, and Injustices: The Structure of Remedial Law - Introductory Text","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Law; Political science; Common law; Substantive law; Private law; Sanctions; Public law; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.005244240665135988,"score_gpt":0.2524078314163625,"score_spread":0.24716359075122654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999271827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833631,0.0013812744,0.00006957394,0.0044719065,0.0002992419,0.00021749419,0.0000038785147,0.000012662305,0.010180897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969304,0.00090188807,0.000031229287,0.00009098186,0.0009067345,6.124695e-7,0.0000010946065,0.0000053038516,0.001131726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866575,0.00009951833,0.00015648598,0.000115483905,0.00025609124,0.000706687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952227,0.00007625587,0.00013772752,0.00013985932,0.00007055801,0.000053331514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000843881,0.00006607265,0.00010013538,0.000021533267,0.0005349216,0.000055757726,0.00030574834,0.00005812068,0.00012514002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033982702,0.000041036394,0.00003725771,0.00011616182,0.00030199738,0.00016400391,0.00003426446,0.00086395175,0.0000112107555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008865547,0.000008577972,0.0005383805,0.0000019809668,0.000024137844,6.280387e-8,0.0016275571,0.0000046890596,0.0014202432,0.9948315,0.00008511522,0.0014489105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003202046,0.000104219034,0.00076032156,0.000009696521,0.00004907667,0.000021363308,0.009230794,0.000011169039,0.00029058088,0.65509814,0.333986,0.00011844036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021549226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051089764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33973336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018191972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085452176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9662254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999351544","doi":"","title":"Resolving the Status of the Bare Trust","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Express trust; Trust law; Assertion; Settlor; Commit; Blind trust; Voting trust; Law and economics; Function (biology); Agency (philosophy); Law; Business; Class (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.009721086446696083,"score_gpt":0.27584599492331513,"score_spread":0.26612490847661907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999351544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9095321,0.0018576856,0.00014362519,0.012093145,0.0002226664,0.00026535534,0.000003278206,0.000012171106,0.07586994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991255,0.0020374875,0.0000087109,0.000093618146,0.0001779833,0.0000022053816,1.669418e-7,0.0000050240023,0.0064198035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981301,0.0001167166,0.00012558403,0.000066121225,0.00027296485,0.0012885293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995697,0.00006601056,0.0000804437,0.00017678112,0.00005979175,0.00004726766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011728631,0.00004242092,0.000058236277,0.000012263847,0.000687518,0.000048162507,0.00048011146,0.000030397076,0.00011734399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010631085,0.000022135839,0.000083138766,0.0001976128,0.00010193926,0.000083546736,0.000045355326,0.00080605043,0.0000259977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003432517,0.000009741739,0.016407149,9.05787e-7,0.000016581369,2.7714643e-8,0.0021315808,0.000027259284,0.00024126004,0.97697115,0.00015004248,0.0040408736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027856315,0.000052715506,0.020196432,0.000017929653,0.00002471559,0.000010029789,0.041713584,0.00006052557,0.00012692677,0.17696233,0.76045513,0.0001011147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017007134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008074317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80000883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046517904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028596877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52879024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W300055750","doi":"","title":"KVP: Riparian Resurrection in 20th Century Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Supreme court; Legislature; Property rights; Water quality; Law; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.015977644967049103,"score_gpt":0.2918316720079739,"score_spread":0.27585402704092477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W300055750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8330008,0.0024118586,0.0006407349,0.0040878556,0.0010508724,0.00024281614,0.0000012158971,0.000045944023,0.15851794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99076194,0.0018557478,0.00005075329,0.000059908834,0.0008233785,0.0000067518804,0.0000015770038,0.0000067574124,0.0064331917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754167,0.0001269902,0.00017471914,0.00009261785,0.00022359623,0.0018404205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964327,0.000025111716,0.00008535711,0.00008485282,0.000032481326,0.00012894985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027433971,0.00006654668,0.00008145606,0.000069858754,0.00051233824,0.000060634982,0.00017792909,0.00007145327,0.00013848927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004441148,0.00006287621,0.000055307453,0.00023083118,0.00004186929,0.0004013447,0.000017914621,0.0013617186,0.000072527735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012140373,0.00010271122,0.050643392,4.7989073e-7,0.000014116453,2.704476e-7,0.007840004,0.0000064396922,0.000043508557,0.9303186,0.00021261492,0.010805751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002937429,0.00003627459,0.03852101,0.000008390248,0.000012598039,0.000025467612,0.01010783,0.0000034977083,0.00001528292,0.087119356,0.8637102,0.0001463032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10923614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8032627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8634976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035669904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027030872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9327556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000879703","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/sjzdq","title":"Be careful what you promise: Proprietary estoppel in Cowper-Smith v Morgan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Supreme court; Appeal; Law and economics; Equity (law); Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Law; Political science; Business; Economics; History","score_opus":0.03779937751724886,"score_gpt":0.3402926314269537,"score_spread":0.30249325390970483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000879703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73085475,0.00017866174,0.00008178758,0.045836344,0.00021254,0.0008282337,0.000006308825,0.00015912481,0.22184224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98515326,0.000107549145,0.0006887499,0.0010332745,0.00032572055,0.000050607763,0.0000040614186,0.000009620939,0.012627174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990307,0.000047321744,0.00014729457,0.00023724261,0.00025246225,0.00028496742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949634,0.000019619098,0.00003464061,0.00022737487,0.00010257485,0.0001194487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029970115,0.00007988521,0.00009825192,0.000034477624,0.00036293757,0.00018021032,0.00028364995,0.00006422041,0.0006688414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004514885,0.00006624028,0.000030754312,0.00034013376,0.00033147458,0.00051151885,0.00006944765,0.0001070677,0.00020023598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056410194,0.00081035215,0.101090655,0.00006475694,0.000044369837,0.000019808085,0.17109251,0.000009369842,0.002431235,0.6053646,0.034379378,0.084636554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003022801,0.000050825853,0.016408715,0.000028495224,0.000007982425,8.4218254e-7,0.022473685,0.000103013466,0.0013841614,0.0021173821,0.95689076,0.0002318582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066177053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021799348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009419316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029694874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002608687","doi":"10.3968/11421","title":"Research on the Possibility of Civil Public Interests Protected by Individual Litigation in China: Based on the Path of Similarity of Interests","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Public interest; Action (physics); Class action; China; Law; Dual (grammatical number); Similarity (geometry); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Business; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.0817701611033452,"score_gpt":0.36532989246816017,"score_spread":0.28355973136481494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002608687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.935722,0.0000029932762,0.000003989917,0.01455766,0.000035725225,0.0008263433,0.00014194596,0.000004435549,0.04870494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999719,7.348808e-7,0.000006429054,0.00017552084,0.000021809872,0.000033531207,0.0000032558721,0.0000031933935,0.00003647969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975897,0.0006356078,0.00023335392,0.00023824234,0.00091855926,0.000384504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985991,0.00046329186,0.00014557182,0.0003043634,0.00034486648,0.00014279372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006953876,0.00006213779,0.00011670426,0.00017406663,0.00062867894,0.000079240584,0.001184261,0.000081169645,0.00015765023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018043031,0.000042109754,0.00004210998,0.0023626608,0.0025505966,0.00014043476,0.00007434675,0.00037055046,0.0000039062215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000202277,0.00022028096,0.1083176,0.000029103958,0.000005482701,3.248104e-7,0.026650378,0.000005177341,0.0032549044,0.8576854,0.0014535596,0.0023575956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023791312,0.0002092374,0.96204555,0.00013773322,0.000002972297,3.389099e-8,0.0196361,0.00071449525,0.002752876,0.01101515,0.003100139,0.00014779274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13787048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43613556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85372794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045811423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002701879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.939778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004908272","doi":"","title":"New Brunswick acts and regulations - GeneralPublic Trustee Act","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.07098042874741578,"score_gpt":0.30185857281449985,"score_spread":0.23087814406708407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004908272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11812469,0.000038476486,0.0016752289,0.0061194524,0.000054170876,0.00015904286,7.500865e-7,0.00010953186,0.8737186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241108,0.00003805125,0.009177673,0.00026554617,0.00017871874,0.0000030164306,0.0000016476756,0.0000046361074,0.06621992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995219,0.00002330093,0.00008186085,0.00012076779,0.00010017803,0.00015197993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960834,0.000021034168,0.000027699323,0.00013018936,0.000028992768,0.00018372528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012527821,0.00004452959,0.000050006434,0.000026924401,0.000370711,0.000071905306,0.00012131616,0.000046870282,0.0016984496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029163666,0.000038739698,0.000021265716,0.00016584128,0.00006499312,0.0002601228,0.000033118344,0.00004200505,0.000077116696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.3538484e-7,0.000009935077,0.0033409346,4.9633366e-7,0.0000032060482,1.0142121e-7,0.0034123487,4.0431942e-7,0.000030522588,0.98389244,0.004402905,0.0049059885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011890123,0.000008762709,0.14292873,0.0000014364085,0.000007754269,5.173169e-7,0.00066212175,0.000032253283,0.00018126726,0.014934236,0.8410293,0.00009471095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039437033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03554616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9689582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001783019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038297276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004914957","doi":"","title":"The Decline of Revocation by Physical Act","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Law; Statute; Probate; Settlor; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0135644701985473,"score_gpt":0.3019006387724308,"score_spread":0.2883361685738835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004914957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8134332,0.00019084723,0.00007149808,0.014506282,0.00015006907,0.00039786383,0.000016770156,0.000049153346,0.17118435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99067795,0.00006877562,0.00007806115,0.000348637,0.00022474075,0.000018127112,0.0000067199526,0.0000054907123,0.008571489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928695,0.00006673148,0.00012480562,0.000121528734,0.00024849622,0.00015149589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993384,0.00017854368,0.00008128937,0.00026045402,0.00006867645,0.000072677685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038005965,0.00004869331,0.00008147727,0.000005053335,0.00034788623,0.00005951503,0.00031281108,0.00003706406,0.00011274555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008902467,0.000035177418,0.00005333768,0.00014555441,0.00014995446,0.00013711838,0.000050917617,0.00010511049,0.00053015014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005804953,0.000058049187,0.0015040332,0.000004148624,0.0000070054894,3.526105e-8,0.00052180595,0.0000062889226,0.0042699496,0.982955,0.008204184,0.0024636877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010622253,0.000015759219,0.0014452878,0.0000060621683,0.0000054285597,4.9319546e-8,0.00029842026,0.000058914637,0.0014758996,0.0087159965,0.9878162,0.000055716726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043031406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025910079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97961205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003449379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075684984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6814184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005092090","doi":"","title":"Practice and procedure: Setting aside default judgment - whether judgment regularly or irregularly entered - service under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s109X(1) - requirements for affadavit of service","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Aside; Law; Business; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.04035083230386558,"score_gpt":0.306273896790521,"score_spread":0.2659230644866554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005092090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7015535,0.00009386512,0.0074929125,0.28098503,0.00006663136,0.0022599134,0.00012942977,0.00024957064,0.0071691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687341,0.00013444814,0.028102739,0.00092928775,0.00002507578,0.0000073287306,0.000025885625,0.000014069978,0.0020270895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859357,0.00006875318,0.0002827211,0.00040970184,0.00030944112,0.0003357944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982835,0.00009746148,0.00050960196,0.00041275012,0.00058990053,0.00010675288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055343966,0.00016381178,0.00026751845,0.00017910065,0.0005616533,0.00003543359,0.0005146709,0.00026906683,0.000066131484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015849227,0.0001698145,0.000059416605,0.00066074735,0.00020526568,0.00047873624,0.00017356843,0.00017767887,0.000008532375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036484972,0.005991274,0.030681577,0.0013793709,0.0018604805,0.000069925336,0.039130766,0.00060594996,0.1154564,0.7232627,0.019503117,0.058409918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011622151,0.0015084421,0.119043484,0.0012776051,0.0015712169,0.000051596533,0.14033891,0.0016824949,0.012897118,0.09080933,0.6172319,0.0019657584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028050514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007946484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6324534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016265639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003252535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005329105","doi":"","title":"International Impact and Influence: Three Landmark Cases from the Canadian Law of Obligations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Common law; Precedent; Order (exchange); Political science; Comparative law; Landmark; International law; Philosophy of law; Business; Cartography; Geography","score_opus":0.04158349804114284,"score_gpt":0.3147964238316813,"score_spread":0.27321292579053846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005329105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79530853,0.000011450236,0.00031393542,0.0049453597,0.000025498211,0.00027063242,0.0012286732,0.000014240674,0.19788167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978162,0.0003470883,0.0010044861,0.000029360917,0.00006698101,1.3139073e-7,0.000057096782,0.0000043057976,0.000674323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986453,0.00021223727,0.000078303514,0.00022129134,0.00050092035,0.0003419516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805826,0.0006348112,0.000087089,0.00027652175,0.0006257263,0.00031757608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005709611,0.00007977339,0.00012894023,0.00023410343,0.0028891873,0.000060082057,0.0010747133,0.00007339385,0.00042026863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016301304,0.000080836755,0.00008565722,0.0005599781,0.0038356076,0.00049997773,0.00042384432,0.00027275857,0.000006650168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023672634,0.000075109485,0.2771915,0.000007838691,0.00019273061,0.000036351397,0.018532012,0.000025217942,0.00030140713,0.695402,0.003741384,0.0042576916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003507835,0.00010436716,0.27520925,0.000026667363,0.000021300159,0.0000011568391,0.016044255,0.00026003283,0.000010241121,0.0114621855,0.696418,0.0000917587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.878148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9745467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6926766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026393088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009306274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005824885","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0063","title":"Civil order, markets, and the intelligibility of the criminal law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Criminal law; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil society; Modernity; Social order; Sociology; Political science; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.019536961946682915,"score_gpt":0.24530791825934686,"score_spread":0.22577095631266395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005824885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0826213,0.0010681185,0.0010224197,0.031480767,0.00010784507,0.0002581387,0.0000191069,0.000011997966,0.88341033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987935,0.00046273536,0.00023215472,0.0002384231,0.000051759034,2.4891877e-8,9.7846666e-8,0.0000012271514,0.0002200765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941707,0.0001810161,0.00008388409,0.00006402976,0.00017667102,0.00007734952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995046,0.00009879529,0.00011674621,0.00009009168,0.00011568573,0.000074056064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046008584,0.00003504,0.00008848312,0.0000014448839,0.0009391631,0.000020973594,0.00038112898,0.000027056522,0.0005380833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055191304,0.000023063634,0.00007369087,0.000032180324,0.0012876147,0.00016493951,0.00012060257,0.00010885621,7.8683496e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001044545,0.000020476404,0.00028778188,0.000009384063,0.000018637103,5.1283007e-7,0.022761911,0.0000038647177,0.000021650632,0.9750744,0.00064366974,0.0010532687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078974443,0.00003068598,0.0045603192,0.000022198576,0.000101158024,0.0000031713867,0.057156634,0.00013763212,0.00006130401,0.004608455,0.93245816,0.000070554655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10643164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3266636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97046596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052905816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006583597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8995187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010482745","doi":"","title":"Institut trustu v českém právu","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Déjà vu; Psychology","score_opus":0.009757716871764521,"score_gpt":0.2784274245160057,"score_spread":0.2686697076442412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010482745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0921657,0.0017856258,0.000012338581,0.00010633788,0.0024227097,0.00067095866,0.00025262177,0.00016777011,0.90241593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.695266,0.000027680697,0.00010970293,0.000032577824,0.0019142883,0.0001073334,0.002010757,0.0000485348,0.3004831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953697,0.00011919149,0.0011298081,0.0007690868,0.0021854995,0.00042676224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955628,0.00022602425,0.0010119411,0.00044686082,0.0025091663,0.00024319834],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024624867,0.00047092087,0.0005161277,0.00034632333,0.0013167022,0.0016756599,0.00074313785,0.0007844351,0.0000103717975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038573705,0.0004902787,0.0005128031,0.0006557765,0.00038049935,0.001570532,0.000050457296,0.0006162538,0.000023319253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006926523,0.00268837,0.015393987,0.0015217842,0.0009008351,0.00041659738,0.025231216,0.00030437982,0.015558039,0.8546617,0.07505739,0.0075730216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045426204,0.00009107272,0.019737577,0.00092516665,0.00012298404,0.000049203336,0.00091089366,0.000021823591,0.007253164,0.005640675,0.9637885,0.0010046529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046988745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019484657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050825905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020474014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010769090","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0142","title":"Criminalization, legal moralism, and abolition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Criminal law; Government (linguistics); Argumentative; Law; Political science; Punishment (psychology); Realm; Sociology; Criminology; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02444520781592778,"score_gpt":0.2549425004430945,"score_spread":0.23049729262716673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010769090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17153972,0.0010547753,0.01359759,0.045952804,0.00015392131,0.0002228889,0.000035976,0.00007255249,0.76736975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980816,0.00040313345,0.000831067,0.00022818048,0.00013713802,1.4149868e-8,0.0000010258352,0.0000015433932,0.0003162779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966884,0.000039895713,0.000050561735,0.0000540287,0.00011682259,0.00006986697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966973,0.000008685035,0.000059322545,0.000027248183,0.00009592974,0.0001391064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000858061,0.00002647006,0.000052136522,0.000003319287,0.0006842065,0.000035611494,0.000102965634,0.000025137379,0.0006192975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000110247065,0.00003072741,0.000026091322,0.000018736971,0.00014777399,0.00048960187,0.000023040453,0.00004316927,0.000002844196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001125731,0.00001114839,0.0001989884,0.000003785985,0.000006683132,0.0000036430424,0.0152787985,0.000012542301,0.00006821928,0.98176503,0.0019061132,0.00073377934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018931359,0.000022925708,0.0018008354,0.000005122035,0.000021118312,0.0000025748868,0.019176241,0.00008783844,0.00001441828,0.0006502855,0.97798383,0.000045500085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0879778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05161421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98111475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059784183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043957014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9656913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011087261","doi":"","title":"Fraud on a Power, Improper Purpose and Fiduciary Accountability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Opportunism; Compromise; Law and economics; Business; Power (physics); Function (biology); Law; Accounting; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.008289523043366257,"score_gpt":0.2868769427172159,"score_spread":0.27858741967384965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011087261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9561049,0.0006864074,0.000094591225,0.0036029716,0.00013047241,0.0002481413,0.0000024459127,0.000025076972,0.039105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447256,0.0010703531,0.000018771645,0.00030264672,0.00016664722,0.0000060391358,6.033525e-7,0.000008842695,0.0039535067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982391,0.000084908235,0.00013842856,0.00018530093,0.00025981793,0.0010924239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956286,0.000051822437,0.00006867745,0.00016069027,0.000061006864,0.000094956915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018295655,0.000081283855,0.000102109225,0.000034418284,0.00047101633,0.00011298703,0.00022297089,0.0000721467,0.00023509063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051043924,0.000064784486,0.000055506876,0.0001230708,0.00008134377,0.00022601575,0.000027519452,0.0010362621,0.00019689636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003882126,0.00011036697,0.011362686,0.000002876521,0.000031574164,4.6999816e-7,0.0028617985,0.000003766256,0.0005139959,0.9644472,0.00017702447,0.020449398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010182526,0.0006168887,0.020687025,0.000024595292,0.000028195014,0.000048474634,0.022879878,0.000031327385,0.000081684586,0.35609886,0.5980545,0.00043029373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009826792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027893384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60834837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052276807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014667966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45021012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014248467","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2020.68.1.ptp","title":"Personal Tax Planning: Due Diligence Defence to Liability for Unpaid Statutory Remittances","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Statutory law; Due diligence; Business; Context (archaeology); Liability; Pension; Income tax; Appeal; Law; Economics; Finance; Law and economics; Public economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05704255070104716,"score_gpt":0.28777419507125135,"score_spread":0.2307316443702042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014248467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5368188,0.00091857975,0.006800861,0.4311946,0.0013905305,0.0017950287,0.002941387,0.00010364641,0.018036578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825814,0.000037010046,0.002055412,0.004184102,0.0019320786,0.00011543545,0.000018783425,0.00003430461,0.00904152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734086,0.00012453097,0.0004208643,0.0005369211,0.0002213886,0.0013554536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99350005,0.00023271846,0.00019764547,0.00024544713,0.0003695008,0.0054546124],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009874072,0.00021906612,0.0003127492,0.00014140681,0.0019018339,0.00025500453,0.00087147154,0.00016171357,0.00034106002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017210193,0.00024383103,0.00016993815,0.00070478744,0.00025913672,0.00031667628,0.00003468425,0.00051720004,0.000044259734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010692513,0.000062420535,0.035360634,0.00021971426,0.00011780497,0.00053294154,0.23228365,0.0019186956,0.0005429082,0.031530082,0.6798447,0.017479543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015130678,0.000099740995,0.004780806,0.000060700993,0.000024669405,0.000026043517,0.009681687,0.0004158859,0.00003339149,0.0012499723,0.9831169,0.00035885864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20598389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9248785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7188946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015448157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028074519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30144229","doi":"10.1111/pan.13448","title":"Smoke, Mirrors & Contract Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Severability; Law; Exclusion clause; Unconscionability; Law and economics; Privity of contract; Private law; Contract theory; Database transaction; Frustration of purpose; Relational contract; Contract management; Business; Public law; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04689551957298158,"score_gpt":0.36434719192604037,"score_spread":0.31745167235305877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30144229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37842622,0.0000019729832,0.000014227086,0.0052008736,0.00009675402,0.000060251532,0.0000014772096,0.000053925698,0.6161443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934805,0.000003027226,0.00056789484,0.0010206893,0.00010688197,0.000009474469,8.4672087e-7,0.0000025370837,0.004808155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964035,0.000010373239,0.000054778837,0.00007303568,0.000097899596,0.00012356848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972636,0.000044273518,0.000015364381,0.00010446933,0.000029546944,0.00007999552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017650836,0.000027192418,0.0000345757,0.000005773669,0.000345475,0.000052220854,0.0001351045,0.000044431734,0.0031661028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027081507,0.000022509626,0.000025424559,0.000060966835,0.00015631189,0.000090609006,0.000012394597,0.00009989428,0.00028188416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9792616e-7,0.000014418994,0.0013929103,1.831958e-7,0.0000010752304,1.7510268e-7,0.00045974908,2.264173e-8,0.0009476371,0.9949361,0.00030928166,0.0019382606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042930707,0.0000018771591,0.009891114,2.8026318e-7,0.0000017230989,1.202427e-7,0.00018703427,0.000009632804,0.00036626286,0.0047291555,0.98472863,0.000041248644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07810546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1499416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99020696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005850573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038783466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014659821","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0095","title":"The implications of property as self-government","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Land tenure; Alienation; Land law; Property rights; Corporate governance; Scholarship; Property (philosophy); Political science; Government (linguistics); Common ownership; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.017524330141002003,"score_gpt":0.24212745615857714,"score_spread":0.22460312601757515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014659821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010586061,0.00019961064,0.0006375495,0.050165612,0.00003803072,0.00016666547,0.000016817341,0.00001792457,0.93817174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974187,0.00063228025,0.00064443046,0.000104918516,0.000063001164,5.4500166e-8,1.7167145e-7,0.0000015695551,0.0011348646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952775,0.000045376582,0.00007436911,0.000049348462,0.00022261788,0.0000805402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956805,0.000034586203,0.00012284354,0.00007315351,0.00009557951,0.00010581589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001576797,0.000026818589,0.0000526136,9.256697e-7,0.0011890051,0.000018511033,0.00035420456,0.000020227866,0.00029344874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018949042,0.000018461624,0.000057036166,0.000023801043,0.00015984589,0.00015973666,0.00005262928,0.000055560464,0.00000571766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023020228,0.000060498776,0.00055401097,0.0000033961096,0.00004640979,7.5211966e-7,0.017800288,0.000009965261,0.00057744706,0.97131836,0.0048481636,0.0047576935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110097375,0.00003477721,0.0014347484,0.0000029243665,0.000018375293,7.725058e-7,0.015615002,0.000017546514,0.00006782767,0.00048350176,0.98218644,0.000027969301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03524798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055292167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001802762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010654826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9711764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017427509","doi":"","title":"Natural Law and the Nature of Law in a Nutshell","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Flinders University; Monash University; Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; Macquarie University; University of Alberta; University of Oxford; York University; Bond University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Natural law; Law; Natural (archaeology); Relevance (law); Philosophy of law; Natural order; Political science; Positive law; Comparative law; Black letter law; Philosophy; Private law; Geography","score_opus":0.021494491693023494,"score_gpt":0.297659598069635,"score_spread":0.2761651063766115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017427509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30249992,0.000073217,0.0000011276084,0.0016020362,0.00003289761,0.00036975363,0.000020328105,0.000014923828,0.6953858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95877504,0.00014501138,0.00005263883,0.00009581827,0.00002132338,1.0222513e-7,0.0000053538242,0.000004268544,0.04090042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985493,0.00025912432,0.00008347479,0.00026914992,0.0004801617,0.00035883635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901956,0.00033847734,0.000057564146,0.00025481932,0.00020129535,0.0001283056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084169704,0.00008248667,0.00017185553,0.00022632917,0.00070140767,0.00003968111,0.0006285492,0.00017138274,0.000102667946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033727527,0.000075857846,0.00008126169,0.0010065464,0.001991496,0.00045448614,0.00037917192,0.000791666,0.000017918608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016504325,0.000043085816,0.00133072,0.000011815182,0.000014745409,0.00005833759,0.0019943132,0.000001823426,0.00010995309,0.99562734,0.00061269786,0.00003013441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00190917,0.000034899454,0.0015504176,0.000028462444,0.000014814484,0.0000011468654,0.035712544,0.00003707997,0.00008289492,0.0057066367,0.95478535,0.00013661156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026623925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0477346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108917426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023668798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97985786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020879179","doi":"","title":"Conscience With a Filter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Equity (law); Morality; Law and economics; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Normative; Sociology","score_opus":0.019761823654179805,"score_gpt":0.27790530879503633,"score_spread":0.2581434851408565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020879179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43364775,0.0012948441,0.07843209,0.2925199,0.00013295803,0.00052254664,0.000006453886,0.00020796925,0.19323552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659526,0.00044995834,0.00017826077,0.0010546418,0.0003031435,0.0000033554027,2.4317134e-7,0.0000046089945,0.0014105195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985022,0.000040458002,0.00008022792,0.00010865015,0.00023784251,0.0010306505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996731,0.000022458216,0.000052610518,0.000052299118,0.00005228714,0.00014723986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005870739,0.000046865694,0.000057446887,0.000013005662,0.00058653794,0.00009297178,0.0002762785,0.000021400103,0.00009258538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005219973,0.000034873352,0.00002953521,0.00025044815,0.00015453763,0.00016965397,0.000016677825,0.00062122184,0.00007730335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093564495,0.000010561823,0.00092661113,5.1246985e-7,0.000011259378,0.0000012613198,0.002317999,0.0000118152575,0.00013131632,0.99237436,0.00024082768,0.003964105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059930125,0.00039410227,0.00052067154,0.00000960974,0.000026809765,0.00007725822,0.024094881,0.00014390623,0.00010143417,0.14217405,0.8315907,0.00026723061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022457367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026802167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8502003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018656693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028713285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5093613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022274203","doi":"10.5539/ass.v16n5p148","title":"The Doctrine of Ultra Vires: Commendable or Condemnable!","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ultra vires; Doctrine; Creditor; Shareholder; Law; Business; English law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.04623671998949008,"score_gpt":0.3516685603337937,"score_spread":0.3054318403443036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022274203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00307909,0.000026297137,0.00018518498,0.104344815,0.000082692604,0.00024257149,0.000013409402,0.0000522746,0.8919737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742377,0.00004837404,0.0000978921,0.0009740982,0.0002455669,0.000012264459,4.5807428e-7,0.000003326084,0.0011942686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998716,0.000062454565,0.00017220626,0.0001817639,0.0005128412,0.0003547491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936044,0.00014039957,0.00010638582,0.00010727704,0.00011776586,0.00016770435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087257964,0.00005667755,0.0000988438,0.000013066717,0.003354919,0.0001618289,0.00091179425,0.000034839046,0.00014668558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045855375,0.00003776723,0.00004344603,0.0014028191,0.0023728255,0.00025391806,0.00007516104,0.000107315595,0.00003905759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001137577,0.000019857995,0.00015523576,0.0000034705095,0.0000036604686,5.875163e-7,0.020701436,2.768632e-7,0.0027438456,0.92952794,0.004498359,0.04233393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011908188,0.000030748757,0.0015686171,0.0000026386488,0.000004975192,1.5422329e-7,0.023133215,0.000010991491,0.0014522753,0.002818725,0.9707784,0.0000801605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009925863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050784636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99434465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062586194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006641469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023061461","doi":"","title":"Commonwealth v. Western Australia and the Operation in Federal Systems of the Presumption that Statutes do not Apply to The Crown","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Commonwealth; Statute; Law; Crown (dentistry); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing; Medicine","score_opus":0.147808435311745,"score_gpt":0.38682175027404436,"score_spread":0.23901331496229936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023061461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639227,0.00020070004,0.000078055156,0.032538693,0.000042339503,0.0017652676,0.000056239478,0.000015938269,0.0013800616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994336,0.00052674656,0.00006951381,0.00011403318,0.000057898178,0.000017003147,0.0000047668086,0.000009043415,0.004865012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954405,0.002285439,0.00026282595,0.00033191146,0.0011927598,0.0004865816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981825,0.00072126376,0.00013525269,0.0005478617,0.00023809099,0.000175075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061683273,0.0001242024,0.00023880637,0.000121108256,0.0022809464,0.00036367626,0.0013346549,0.00014086602,0.00017759125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018051604,0.00008422044,0.0000944237,0.0007312017,0.0012827765,0.00096586643,0.0003159638,0.00094621594,0.000058436886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025030556,0.0004383305,0.40862557,0.00029205333,0.00018649948,0.000014345287,0.12967962,0.010968589,0.0013217238,0.42726752,0.005563988,0.013138705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021495896,0.00012874501,0.86753744,0.00032950417,0.00003681262,0.0000050245294,0.03600965,0.00055392005,0.00020618708,0.002227359,0.09053957,0.00027619855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06881562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0551676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4589119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019067655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026020923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99901795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024744873","doi":"10.4324/9780429056550-2","title":"The implied obligation of good faith","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Faith; Philosophy; Good faith; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.0344626129516426,"score_gpt":0.2907933194414055,"score_spread":0.2563307064897629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024744873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006339948,0.000053361517,0.00013613803,0.010925859,0.000045924102,0.00023115808,0.000016265758,0.00003622676,0.98854876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11645271,0.00028186094,0.00013440243,0.00020671294,0.000290148,0.00001061055,0.0000123685095,0.000011963663,0.88259923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940103,0.000008309775,0.00016166198,0.00011559663,0.00023188892,0.00008152281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994953,0.000097148506,0.00013814376,0.00015069779,0.00006711406,0.000051555387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014630804,0.00006594374,0.000093904295,0.000010235676,0.00035677885,0.000045862795,0.0002503994,0.00009987481,0.00028078174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019491486,0.000044026714,0.00007110863,0.000028455184,0.00017810542,0.000029446343,0.00004912609,0.00011104025,0.00015362285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.3681143e-7,0.00000137718,0.000001999132,0.0000021902772,0.000010005151,5.1986802e-8,0.0003458402,2.2572175e-7,0.000015345138,0.99293613,0.002804132,0.0038817844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022821898,0.000006260944,0.000024770408,0.000004556123,0.000010856966,2.8565838e-8,0.00019585877,0.000002936215,0.000025481377,0.15370905,0.8459475,0.00004987025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000441092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015618837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8431434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029467767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001581489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30743632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026209127","doi":"","title":"The Tort of Nuisance: 'Trucking On'","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Harm; Honour; Law; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Property (philosophy); Permission; Damages; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01244556866015709,"score_gpt":0.30345800432432857,"score_spread":0.29101243566417145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026209127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7198972,0.00341629,0.012727463,0.0815891,0.00078187574,0.00042392575,0.000006657369,0.00007574964,0.18108174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878282,0.0051199896,0.0000113329725,0.000042769836,0.00038542715,0.0000021707656,5.0743e-8,0.000004537208,0.006605521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862146,0.00007322706,0.00013209906,0.00006499577,0.00024260666,0.00086559635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994941,0.00018742941,0.00010959313,0.00010603171,0.00006149334,0.000041368115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020927663,0.000040197658,0.00005247982,0.000014711503,0.0007868557,0.00003077307,0.00031300838,0.00002701325,0.000023294031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015358595,0.000020043317,0.000058093145,0.00009310844,0.0001463877,0.000076421915,0.000014756734,0.0003088352,0.000033729484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056408408,0.000008170133,0.00056437525,1.6532402e-7,0.000012186303,6.859199e-8,0.0002587457,6.312291e-7,0.00025649808,0.935163,0.00012134787,0.063609175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017701562,0.0000628967,0.00087690615,0.000016884891,0.0000064539654,0.000005499328,0.0032005347,0.0000012524007,0.00019952367,0.5592725,0.4361194,0.000061098915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012965662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002912723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43599805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041175232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013866143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60519373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027151415","doi":"","title":"The Barrie guide to tort 2020. Volume 1","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London Met Repository (London Metropolitan University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Law; Liability; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.01118540391842486,"score_gpt":0.25943406872022245,"score_spread":0.24824866480179758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027151415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12199111,0.0004979883,0.003648715,0.026068963,0.0008763684,0.0010299839,0.000046474623,0.0004817134,0.84535867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76446694,0.00021588319,0.0023613444,0.0012625132,0.0012571847,0.0000073820665,0.000005595876,0.00003348944,0.23038968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738854,0.00048049315,0.00032105038,0.0005500824,0.0006378461,0.0006219809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997833,0.00022940477,0.00015688252,0.0005489624,0.00027483987,0.00095692195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040012866,0.00021044567,0.0002607525,0.00010781461,0.0029895485,0.00027634524,0.0012926143,0.00012488903,0.00013747277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042740357,0.00019490112,0.00024528507,0.001581458,0.00042415562,0.00033419923,0.0003052187,0.00028661144,0.0002813763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015714181,0.000055400145,0.010018331,0.00001270797,0.00011495144,0.00019268559,0.0021094123,0.000029022798,0.0077174786,0.8877964,0.09061804,0.0011784307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002519518,0.00013360778,0.0007806802,0.000005442577,0.00006528528,0.0000022784063,0.011730517,0.000026726637,0.001480231,0.00013978092,0.9851405,0.00024302478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062275315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012436033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8945224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011611326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035111158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028963871","doi":"10.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i28.p163-178.2020","title":"LA BONNE FOI ET LE PRECEDENT: BHASIN C. HRYNEW ET LA COMMON LAW CANADIENNE","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"National Strength and Conditioning Association; BC Cancer Agency; China Scholarship Council; Royal Bank of Canada","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04135992791512559,"score_gpt":0.3425931463324707,"score_spread":0.30123321841734507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028963871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094943345,0.009632238,0.00051781593,0.23680839,0.00050104596,0.0014740609,0.00095021393,0.0003142561,0.65485865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9813695,0.0041157054,0.0005819978,0.0066204555,0.000573934,0.00010736727,0.00020742902,0.00008683014,0.006336759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956861,0.0011683841,0.00080054323,0.0008198818,0.00054407393,0.000981007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709815,0.0005947486,0.00040731736,0.0006359493,0.000101743484,0.0011620884],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016212242,0.00045348943,0.00071689836,0.00004712518,0.0008220655,0.00070145837,0.0010003952,0.00044863694,0.00059706875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020474891,0.00049859675,0.00036966993,0.00090910535,0.0012308634,0.00063983194,0.00035507538,0.0009572389,0.00038156848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001506816,0.000243637,0.00051010103,0.00033140506,0.00007906164,0.000044786917,0.005850701,0.000028028333,0.000037230362,0.9687087,0.010783705,0.013367609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058987446,0.00010995981,0.0018239783,0.0003948185,0.00011002805,0.000021846367,0.0016985917,0.000275792,0.000026242495,0.0027523541,0.99164414,0.00055234984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051493615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087055594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020281729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010818179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029642795","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2020.1765527","title":"Policy and principle and the character of private law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Tort; Character (mathematics); Law; Philosophy of law; Common law; Public law; Law and economics; Commercial law; Economic Justice; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Liability","score_opus":0.02264501890873773,"score_gpt":0.3312103775753268,"score_spread":0.3085653586665891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029642795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85060674,0.0001696505,0.00015795763,0.10743237,0.000020752726,0.00038765778,0.00001125347,0.00003497712,0.04117865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698323,0.00028382023,0.00016882474,0.0021300311,0.00018952785,0.000011718163,2.7714032e-7,0.0000029237315,0.00022964446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951035,0.000045825345,0.0000995967,0.00011013608,0.00013057029,0.00010354558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996385,0.000106170344,0.000058186728,0.000092721115,0.000023687075,0.00008074804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023059208,0.00004045243,0.00008272449,0.0000069896832,0.00023304156,0.00004682,0.00015824552,0.000026201551,0.000011214942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014789235,0.0000272776,0.000017047616,0.00013595948,0.0006742419,0.00010693151,0.000117163094,0.00006544403,0.0000072393796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007954746,0.0000043177174,0.0010600393,0.000007433305,0.0000026653738,1.7028586e-7,0.0060574445,2.3983165e-7,0.00041754358,0.99185807,0.000020451096,0.0005636949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047229114,0.000021390308,0.030650657,0.000013678065,0.0000129278205,7.5428096e-7,0.00036577208,0.0001406472,0.0009296582,0.016879298,0.9504103,0.00010259252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013487402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014660246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97497874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000063835887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046707068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24842724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030175355","doi":"","title":"The Non-Abdication Rule in Canadian Constitutional Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abdication; Delegation; Doctrine; Political science; Delegate; Law; Legislature; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Parliament; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.012077934473355407,"score_gpt":0.27816970439345273,"score_spread":0.2660917699200973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030175355","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06509849,0.0016909242,0.0036242942,0.52504003,0.00023386747,0.0004596416,0.000013095173,0.000037865073,0.4038018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973572,0.0009823659,0.000016498028,0.0009504168,0.00033300824,0.000007860597,0.0000019943561,0.00000261725,0.0003480556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984638,0.000053008265,0.00012376318,0.00007919517,0.00016584685,0.0011143952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996094,0.000038144517,0.000046028923,0.00005003496,0.000044149474,0.00021222248],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011743326,0.00004056304,0.000043679815,0.000018518565,0.0014797937,0.000101041805,0.0002707351,0.000036950092,0.000027639317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082486615,0.000032217817,0.000030957926,0.00019963768,0.00034720747,0.00011918209,0.000009913353,0.00069027866,0.00008492566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020443242,0.0000040082655,0.0013532671,1.9863789e-7,0.0000053975923,4.3286153e-7,0.00049199717,0.000026243895,0.000014418733,0.9963686,0.00011731843,0.0016161107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013219268,0.000011631448,0.0010412851,0.0000022933407,0.0000034458296,0.0000057876873,0.0027208151,0.00010266591,0.0000057838965,0.22410858,0.7718089,0.000056599558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27317092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9386666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9322587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011168038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011133251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3031497718","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3485","title":"Bringing Rule of Law and Fairness to the Dysfunctional World of Sovereign Debt: A Role for Canada?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Debt restructuring; Restructuring; Jurisdiction; Insolvency; Creditor; Economics; Internal debt; Senior debt; Business; Law; Debt; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Debt-to-GDP ratio; Finance; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02375040094380441,"score_gpt":0.26300140201658245,"score_spread":0.23925100107277805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3031497718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009789373,0.000185285,0.0038160651,0.030211238,0.000112975285,0.00029937123,0.00009291277,0.000010133671,0.95548266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972908,0.0000052818195,0.000755652,0.0014808376,0.00027516368,0.000007641667,9.425871e-7,0.000005513537,0.00017814864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931306,0.000030073239,0.00017247131,0.00008484232,0.00024974247,0.00014978445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947166,0.00010402561,0.00010447671,0.0000566709,0.0001109984,0.00015214496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027216846,0.00004911727,0.00010255205,0.000009835565,0.00065753795,0.000049570106,0.00018650858,0.000017384831,0.00007122039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039028626,0.00003817451,0.000043359832,0.00010454703,0.00008241581,0.00008119187,0.000041187974,0.000097187476,7.7962e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015424255,0.0000092330965,0.00024096589,0.000007806547,0.00001508767,3.4445813e-7,0.0008864666,0.000343306,0.00020056534,0.99716485,0.0006173871,0.000498562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006661927,0.000072571485,0.0022783966,0.00006701543,0.00006344974,0.000010097257,0.00473784,0.0010326866,0.0020998511,0.2203206,0.7684381,0.00021320717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7326072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97887886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98750144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042039246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023990807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5057317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032505178","doi":"","title":"ACPNS Legal Case Notes Series: 2020-41 Friends of Toronto Public Cemeteries Inc. v. Public Guardian and Trustee","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Law; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Public administration","score_opus":0.02445253050181338,"score_gpt":0.243971490218963,"score_spread":0.21951895971714963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032505178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9134562,0.00013466501,0.00036163136,0.06222407,0.000037587753,0.00022797623,0.00012610343,0.00018012674,0.02325161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966061,0.00042027739,0.0025702151,0.00004449191,0.00003103004,0.000001113153,0.000006467454,0.0000068327777,0.0003134545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990209,0.000051812156,0.00017530157,0.00031390382,0.00016434431,0.00027379117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912375,0.00004779511,0.0001651536,0.00029140306,0.00019066605,0.00018125128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018556166,0.000120974895,0.00027492899,0.0000796135,0.0005101949,0.000041395513,0.0004648873,0.00024662312,0.0005287404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022196223,0.00013495838,0.00006583942,0.00038141676,0.0011270446,0.0006372172,0.00045186753,0.00017172124,0.0000106105235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009841872,0.00018993179,0.094091564,0.000112489084,0.00027326823,0.00036884448,0.015637958,0.0000016418774,0.0015901594,0.8411279,0.0016673738,0.044840474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056988886,0.00015781508,0.0057983985,0.00001172636,0.00005528501,0.000041347423,0.04596458,0.00003691662,0.0004993489,0.0010691509,0.9455487,0.00024680546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019500332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04129816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9438814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007127287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018990101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036205926","doi":"10.1002/iir.1382","title":"Promoting fairness in English insolvency valuation cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Creditor; Valuation (finance); Debtor; Bankruptcy; Harm; Shareholder; Actuarial science; Law and economics; English law; Business; Accounting; Economics; Law; Finance; Debt; Political science","score_opus":0.12684449119533425,"score_gpt":0.3954854117395872,"score_spread":0.2686409205442529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036205926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13034068,0.08289304,0.002671388,0.3072494,0.0030482642,0.006597086,0.00017463899,0.0010294603,0.46599606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745954,0.020896018,0.00024356355,0.0031601966,0.00069980737,0.00018029351,0.000039724433,0.000011509805,0.0001734372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841076,0.00015050179,0.00047188342,0.00028269793,0.0004933696,0.00019079757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991331,0.00012073113,0.0001763247,0.000119581564,0.0003352779,0.000114966075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007432257,0.000105108316,0.00019007135,0.000044254753,0.00014722932,0.0000722665,0.00050001114,0.000051495143,0.0005887695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027491692,0.00010576316,0.0000953986,0.00051087694,0.00006009565,0.00046344454,0.0000798152,0.00018262617,0.00013966527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017673394,0.0005870042,0.025535807,0.0014583629,0.00006677236,0.000065111104,0.06539203,0.000045084755,0.00023315426,0.71658486,0.007920627,0.18209352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000182919,0.000025670868,0.002041407,0.0012432117,0.000018011491,0.0000015690717,0.00044990005,0.00044025248,0.000028345314,0.0025867273,0.99279815,0.00018385598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064429163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044442393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9848775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014292872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001968666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6446613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036709131","doi":"10.25071/1925-5624.40370","title":"Acknowledgments and Credits","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tusaaji A Translation Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.08496526746287315,"score_gpt":0.41447258018361016,"score_spread":0.329507312720737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036709131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061275703,0.1772729,0.0038796826,0.044408776,0.00038216752,0.0019986709,0.000023797029,0.00024163236,0.7656648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76793367,0.21916474,0.0034868515,0.0039928476,0.001352535,0.00012779291,0.000020048417,0.000018731722,0.0039027778],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994405,0.0000632122,0.000134687,0.00011896257,0.0001312911,0.000111375295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996793,0.000033262568,0.00003586705,0.000095748794,0.00008072188,0.00007509057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037604297,0.000048141213,0.000090635214,0.000014196627,0.00031135,0.000026567535,0.000082334634,0.000028165177,0.0008537238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037945392,0.0000433909,0.00002732112,0.00020038066,0.00014610164,0.00012576419,0.0000070884835,0.000039692517,0.0003917723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030593,0.00004805639,0.00075879606,0.0004749556,0.000015488464,3.265254e-7,0.0043632975,6.076864e-8,0.00010472891,0.13093969,0.0149206435,0.8483709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069667636,0.000008964537,0.00082243583,0.00026030242,0.000021327949,2.4635182e-7,0.000022282498,0.000014105373,0.0000106734105,0.00076110486,0.9979539,0.00005496858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008582408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043461684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010672798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004399883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93476766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036779457","doi":"10.25071/1925-5624.40391","title":"Acknowledgments and Credits","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tusaaji A Translation Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.16102639344283137,"score_gpt":0.3844557054046228,"score_spread":0.22342931196179144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036779457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024713224,0.33277833,0.0053071114,0.34850353,0.00014298303,0.0023390744,0.000037283327,0.00031286635,0.3081075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6202028,0.3585339,0.002703146,0.016927632,0.0007231856,0.00012119099,0.000030695497,0.000019582914,0.0007379097],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945766,0.000060950988,0.000136386,0.0001222923,0.00013099996,0.00009171062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971247,0.000032803724,0.000033626773,0.000056696288,0.00003581958,0.00012856178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001923384,0.00004778776,0.000103287275,0.0000065519307,0.0001723288,0.000024656883,0.000081426595,0.0000238911,0.00052414875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053974716,0.00004433995,0.000032602726,0.00020764605,0.000047935155,0.000116866446,0.0000073263805,0.000053912077,0.00022020207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053065764,0.00004622223,0.00096918846,0.0017369918,0.000023939945,0.0000012043977,0.01092862,0.000001634286,0.00018573072,0.12637368,0.022247573,0.8374799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007984563,0.000006166277,0.00032613726,0.00015563013,0.000023444161,1.0636976e-7,0.000034894958,0.000047104222,0.0000048491156,0.0002111647,0.99905646,0.000054216154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003589051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005739189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97680885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006638676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004034743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5739061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043080976","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0031","title":"The office of ownership revisited","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Property (philosophy); Easement; Law and economics; Business; Property rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028994996894398883,"score_gpt":0.2555444730131005,"score_spread":0.22654947611870163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043080976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020596221,0.0010894114,0.0009194775,0.024045736,0.00006711271,0.00013200118,0.000015154496,0.000020052601,0.9531148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982829,0.0005737043,0.00034143418,0.000084144645,0.00009688429,8.17343e-9,3.2566848e-7,0.0000013186799,0.0006192579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955696,0.000078017896,0.000072518334,0.000043168864,0.00016766923,0.00008167329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995133,0.00006859348,0.00013436198,0.000058691458,0.00012380803,0.00010121821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026041514,0.000025098927,0.00006335017,0.0000020526395,0.00089245883,0.000017398523,0.0003419502,0.00002392141,0.00042329135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044110202,0.000020283273,0.000065331005,0.00003504041,0.00023231732,0.00016489522,0.000034903056,0.00006995299,0.000005330279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006193934,0.000019835972,0.0002804894,0.000005841973,0.000030851974,0.000002292998,0.014205656,0.000011097398,0.0002693289,0.9766263,0.0054803975,0.003006002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012816144,0.000023058374,0.0008606334,0.0000074346053,0.000015794134,4.0614523e-7,0.017705409,0.000017131179,0.000024756511,0.0001775989,0.9810116,0.000027981083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03245689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05127578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000629659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062110754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9739861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043611909","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0032","title":"Office and contracting-out: an analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Odds; Phenomenon; Government (linguistics); Public office; Business; Service (business); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02467461157356531,"score_gpt":0.2708792790045017,"score_spread":0.24620466743093639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043611909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44279644,0.0004807194,0.010168378,0.012217707,0.000074877986,0.00014204852,0.000033686243,0.000053395685,0.53403276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985797,0.00015434757,0.00082476274,0.00011950652,0.00009265454,6.9743558e-9,8.6864617e-7,0.0000012127925,0.00022696563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996032,0.00006034817,0.000055573393,0.00007317545,0.00012575863,0.000081903425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995354,0.000030175564,0.00009103312,0.00004386453,0.00007843218,0.00022110526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017012662,0.000029718496,0.00009094507,0.00000600294,0.0007684638,0.0000398617,0.00015636803,0.000028750572,0.00086891436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017347133,0.00003323133,0.00005694013,0.000036446847,0.00012772053,0.00046221685,0.000024301335,0.00006736488,0.0000034562295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018072782,0.00017366195,0.0115389135,0.00000903562,0.0006529023,0.00003523981,0.18297704,0.00027521604,0.0008779517,0.79264605,0.0010577731,0.00957551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004042802,0.00006980424,0.014277264,0.0000034044883,0.0004079836,0.0000013089262,0.08454971,0.0007654457,0.000015774196,0.0001226621,0.89927155,0.00011082572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119104974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44979674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89821374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006091552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003681607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043848731","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2020.68.2.bevacqua","title":"Unresolved Controversies in Suing for Negligence of Tax Officials: Canadian and Australasian Insights and a Primer for Policy Makers' Consideration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Liability; Common law; Law; Tax law; Jurisprudence; Agency (philosophy); Judicial review; CLARITY; Law and economics; Economics; Double taxation; Sociology","score_opus":0.03485211775955609,"score_gpt":0.27548922684911525,"score_spread":0.24063710908955915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043848731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5405937,0.0008326236,0.0006987445,0.4513139,0.00022086635,0.0023049721,0.0018812245,0.000011911942,0.0021420445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962233,0.00010465207,0.00083606003,0.0015593676,0.00047485562,0.000045275672,0.000015092803,0.000017744162,0.0007237094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850035,0.00006594551,0.00036565543,0.00025921856,0.00006786844,0.0007409415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969226,0.00032795046,0.00018411146,0.00009838484,0.00022274198,0.002244219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036643483,0.00014059556,0.00029289315,0.0003660679,0.000809172,0.00015436905,0.00017063657,0.00015816359,0.000017678849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019475763,0.00016251067,0.000058635058,0.0003539665,0.00025537392,0.00018218262,0.000010628912,0.00018675598,4.632753e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018458575,0.00004573329,0.045067694,0.0004908745,0.00025892383,0.00018180808,0.18562,0.0006791336,0.0028580434,0.674053,0.06797486,0.022585344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014151079,0.0001814321,0.010423144,0.0001495711,0.00006766618,0.000028696124,0.016125271,0.0016264156,0.00015214896,0.007646856,0.9617401,0.00044359118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9563134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99972516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8937652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008480827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040289965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7147267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044136967","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v33i1.5855","title":"Recent Developments in the Law of Equitable Remedies: What Canada Can Do For You","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Supreme court; Law; Project commissioning; Political science; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04301465892440598,"score_gpt":0.26593507759359203,"score_spread":0.22292041866918605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044136967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015863255,0.24352826,0.00023202565,0.11448072,0.0027599295,0.00797418,0.0002935007,0.00007570089,0.6147924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34071487,0.65585,0.00088406453,0.0013798149,0.00007736598,0.0000041408516,0.000016474365,0.000007662023,0.0010656101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913496,0.00008217799,0.00018358443,0.00012698799,0.00027914075,0.0001931375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993489,0.00012406203,0.00015279665,0.00016901657,0.00015525223,0.000049998096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068477535,0.00006298594,0.00020061102,0.000011342558,0.00035629305,0.000016437956,0.0004435263,0.000035434627,0.00016030346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003215165,0.000056424753,0.00004667786,0.000291087,0.00013697562,0.00014148407,0.00003688449,0.000060191316,0.0000023376497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004268765,0.00006211484,0.000066415065,0.00051562535,0.000020447664,0.0000011383618,0.008253047,0.000008406113,0.000005631973,0.9787446,0.0069327904,0.005385498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120453944,0.0000087443395,0.000005638919,0.0006337753,0.00002657384,6.9392044e-8,0.0033591003,0.0000032834896,0.000021591937,0.00025020383,0.9955078,0.00006281068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48362687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86091334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019100425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020729024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5198117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045202888","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2019-0136","title":"A theory of mistaken assumptions in contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Appeal; Mistake; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Law and economics; Freedom of contract; Common law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.033215750537898256,"score_gpt":0.2628744662742217,"score_spread":0.2296587157363234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045202888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0615676,0.00034446488,0.0012732038,0.0052404385,0.000041369538,0.00012292231,0.000036077618,0.000013613693,0.9313603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898446,0.00012663905,0.000505305,0.000111813606,0.000048082537,2.5553312e-8,5.801312e-7,0.0000015721814,0.00022150297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952424,0.000103545586,0.00009259596,0.000054613567,0.00013435636,0.00009063639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996061,0.000060714727,0.00010720608,0.00004796905,0.00007037954,0.00010767182],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027976476,0.00003077821,0.000095776915,0.0000049215605,0.00032583272,0.000011510542,0.00022339707,0.00003636918,0.0014128486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020406887,0.000034342174,0.00006604848,0.000027840846,0.00025406905,0.00027546627,0.000022152959,0.0000894539,0.0000041544295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003215843,0.000044379278,0.0003770078,0.0000030161325,0.000013563973,0.0000046236423,0.015112424,0.000018630784,0.00027222035,0.9833646,0.0001676477,0.00058977434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008817895,0.00006219527,0.008276144,0.0000308796,0.000039906896,0.0000016152572,0.045722954,0.000056616384,0.000069491405,0.005924546,0.93882954,0.00010429556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1348003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40044007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111553585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070642775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045746807","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12442","title":"The Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (QLD): A form of private governance in action?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Indigenous; Cultural heritage; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Public administration; State (computer science); Political science; Business; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.07945084795307564,"score_gpt":0.3896657111469507,"score_spread":0.31021486319387503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045746807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86609656,0.000039216888,0.00022359671,0.1298792,0.00018977905,0.00021487774,0.000015222647,0.0000099752315,0.003331581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798405,0.00022068327,0.00045934276,0.00007020253,0.00032124703,0.0000045046477,0.0000024820965,0.000004064259,0.00093339477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875706,0.00009838828,0.00047111473,0.00008589988,0.00038396503,0.0002035722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877375,0.000043400116,0.0006120687,0.00007861306,0.0003179736,0.00017417881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066094456,0.00007227127,0.00012143157,0.000016544334,0.00022873038,0.00019429001,0.00034442052,0.000057658686,0.000099988814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035305525,0.000052849955,0.00006378039,0.00056428916,0.00016547886,0.0010312733,0.000008243503,0.00024289223,0.0000052488335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107199274,0.00015297328,0.021405132,0.000023792156,0.000043181033,0.000017095554,0.0073173596,0.000010584389,0.0018915015,0.95159334,0.008380376,0.009057449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038045621,0.00024437427,0.045763083,0.000021212483,0.000012407658,0.000011264725,0.0064515225,0.000022883163,0.0011695205,0.0011255045,0.9446985,0.000099247656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077660225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013470792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9504678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010271284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008419831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21551585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046664697","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198813668.001.0001","title":"Company Directors’ Duties and Conflicts of Interest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Statutory law; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Business; Law; Common law; Political science; Order (exchange); Accounting; Duty; Finance","score_opus":0.11815853599006741,"score_gpt":0.33384416670217776,"score_spread":0.21568563071211033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046664697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022971763,0.0002395843,0.0000075663224,0.00044905863,0.000108072105,0.00022219153,0.00003574481,0.000033131935,0.9966075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16251223,0.00020411746,0.000033408385,0.00006690968,0.000112370646,0.0000033386927,0.000010792957,0.000006954334,0.8370499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994913,0.00002055004,0.00014309325,0.00013384405,0.00010947934,0.00010173038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949193,0.00013830361,0.00010507383,0.00014207879,0.00006410018,0.000058505288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001306527,0.00008175663,0.00020473036,0.000033013348,0.00008988979,0.000036055415,0.0001694528,0.00013369674,0.0006219453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002068732,0.000070141636,0.00004411489,0.000026441408,0.0003580666,0.000040502728,0.000080816746,0.0001080033,0.00007894029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010382901,0.0000070876417,0.00011108196,0.000028106926,0.000014331019,1.01449416e-7,0.0022219017,7.19107e-8,0.0000092428945,0.97581553,0.0212321,0.0005593955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045995883,0.000009258928,0.00032029685,0.000042979733,0.000012485877,9.846624e-8,0.00026234082,0.0000021871906,0.000019855532,0.0040416084,0.99515694,0.00008594728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022575671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004519879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9739248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039706956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017321296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6809865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046703235","doi":"10.29173/alr2599","title":"The Conceptual Structure of Commercial Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Property (philosophy); Bankruptcy; Law and economics; Enforcement; Law; Property law; Argument (complex analysis); Function (biology); Real property; Property rights; Sociology; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04408306192145818,"score_gpt":0.33051945675389544,"score_spread":0.28643639483243727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046703235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025921545,0.03983487,0.000010614422,0.23898001,0.00013832295,0.0010205144,0.000039627943,0.00002758487,0.7173563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699385,0.008295449,0.000028363638,0.021297997,0.0001856397,0.000008123758,0.000005519264,0.0000049019695,0.00023551306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932116,0.00011671388,0.00018635708,0.00009742134,0.00015370744,0.00012461453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932283,0.00030258697,0.0000868339,0.00015697452,0.0000474793,0.00008330165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010798177,0.00005472536,0.00015548374,8.4986425e-7,0.00049362093,0.00002373881,0.00035417653,0.000030988966,0.00034353236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001352897,0.000035050874,0.000072495895,0.00013909998,0.0006509344,0.000059036905,0.00004956613,0.000090698275,0.00005642593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.6890717e-7,0.0000031855611,0.000017585702,0.000047062866,0.0000060884217,5.1600093e-8,0.001020107,1.3593944e-7,0.000016163016,0.99247015,0.004614444,0.00180426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037967988,0.000008111116,0.000017999193,0.000072607145,0.000023664086,1.10272495e-7,0.00009956658,8.227952e-7,0.000038645587,0.0010139671,0.99864113,0.00004539506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022295747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0781856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008116942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046987992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98421484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048446512","doi":"","title":"Townshend v. Townshend & Buttar v. Buttar : Gifts, Exclusions, and Intentions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.06655443817021048,"score_gpt":0.33343272735938606,"score_spread":0.26687828918917555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048446512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41000044,0.0018187196,0.00023199852,0.034762483,0.0010855722,0.0002505793,0.00013203136,0.000015948834,0.5517022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996146,0.00026485472,0.00057640544,0.0008308277,0.00042762747,0.0000029488326,0.0000015356026,0.00001009219,0.001739694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888784,0.00005784629,0.0002905917,0.0001373374,0.00026347878,0.0003629332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980633,0.000049532337,0.00025886696,0.0003141518,0.0002767085,0.0010374117],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065194804,0.000100416975,0.00018023953,0.00009737343,0.0039034637,0.00054206466,0.0006548535,0.00009068627,0.00013082007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029554937,0.00009383429,0.0001014494,0.000070481175,0.0008750455,0.00052236416,0.000051665535,0.00026795367,0.000017736234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046092014,0.000020300911,0.0067358883,0.000006018589,0.000041824413,0.000080744896,0.002744592,0.0000040636332,0.00033729195,0.96919996,0.015272806,0.005551931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021862028,0.000029463286,0.042478383,0.000051313127,0.00003288284,0.00001668531,0.0030854484,0.0000031535224,0.000023765815,0.010154226,0.9437786,0.00012751175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20865245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5599402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022408593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014466034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048470204","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3635","title":"Pluralism and Convergence: Judicial Standardization in Canadian Corporate Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Supreme court; Political science; Statute; Corporate law; Comparative law; Pluralism (philosophy); Judicial review; Federalism; Common law; Separation of powers; Economics; Corporate governance; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.031186820522387675,"score_gpt":0.2971536755198012,"score_spread":0.2659668549974135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048470204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03776697,0.00041725836,0.00036239714,0.014622781,0.00046687995,0.00013810018,0.000061434424,0.000019144916,0.94614506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790853,0.00035784856,0.00029414,0.000820935,0.00027504298,0.0000029403864,0.0000085443435,0.0000064475807,0.00032554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999033,0.0001232481,0.00018598084,0.00012593566,0.00022894857,0.00030291255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992485,0.000022502105,0.00009842951,0.0000712608,0.0001837157,0.00037556078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055604195,0.00006157134,0.000102699974,0.000029987401,0.0011868704,0.00026575712,0.000101705686,0.00007577882,0.00039670288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044656837,0.0000642585,0.000027562888,0.00020599789,0.00019600405,0.0002559368,0.000020142921,0.00020594537,0.00001335003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022636814,0.000008323501,0.002929061,0.0000012695614,0.000004769447,0.000055493492,0.001083718,0.00004759292,0.00007972837,0.99526054,0.00023227335,0.0002949584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053770095,0.00001632394,0.0042421785,0.000043826814,0.000017399807,0.000055986246,0.0020507108,0.00014282475,0.0002961338,0.34413823,0.64823264,0.00022602538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9221532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9601416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022209459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008336791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91285676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W306084194","doi":"","title":"ECONOMIC DURESS IN CANADIAN LAW: TOWARDS A PRINCIPLED APPROACH","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Transaction cost; Inequality; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Bargaining power; Database transaction; Economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03387260653928575,"score_gpt":0.35497202132063843,"score_spread":0.3210994147813527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W306084194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18588126,0.000034148532,0.000027772372,0.0021647587,0.000050460807,0.0002025988,0.0000031851896,0.000023084809,0.8116127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99074966,0.000013652915,0.00058027735,0.00022086162,0.000057149926,0.000047922516,0.0000023113469,0.000006942801,0.008321254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923074,0.000073742005,0.00008868678,0.00016314218,0.00007690939,0.0003667821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995382,0.000015128014,0.000024781762,0.00015930345,0.000012384262,0.00025023054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004663463,0.000058920476,0.00008755626,0.00004332199,0.00025995498,0.000062266394,0.00017429254,0.00006656087,0.0002911166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004182323,0.00006211175,0.000026719179,0.00011951144,0.00008694561,0.00006781084,0.000012265099,0.00007164897,0.00012690882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1974316e-7,0.000012733034,0.0016838919,0.0000018426658,0.00000197874,9.672449e-7,0.008294662,0.00011159508,0.000006544315,0.9895649,0.00023804663,0.00008224757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001329625,0.000002764485,0.0026371644,0.0000020538027,0.0000020870762,5.615867e-7,0.0034356245,0.000117064636,0.000047358306,0.0014254815,0.99209636,0.000100493744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9519456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98202294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99185836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050639804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010619725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31875226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080256185","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v39i2.5019","title":"The End of Fiduciary Accountability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Jurisprudence; Fiduciary; Accountability; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Project commissioning; License; Convention; Expression (computer science); Publishing; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.028252859306871145,"score_gpt":0.26001178622238574,"score_spread":0.23175892691551458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080256185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6150861,0.0003025847,0.00065174367,0.120635994,0.00009582018,0.00019758454,0.000032592598,0.000016671836,0.2629809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993668,0.00022194338,0.000056168312,0.000110328234,0.000096569085,1.629332e-8,2.1895232e-7,0.0000010868049,0.0001468711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949634,0.00013051434,0.00007553873,0.00004170843,0.00017211422,0.00008377789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994898,0.00017448055,0.00010890119,0.00008438596,0.00008498886,0.00005745814],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005863162,0.000026797137,0.00006160565,0.000003654303,0.0016237008,0.000017050457,0.00040222352,0.00002175265,0.00018646503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029617198,0.000016439848,0.00006366009,0.00007789909,0.0007946862,0.0000768004,0.0000483307,0.00014127488,0.000005554429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014720832,0.000049996062,0.0051316917,0.000010357106,0.00007102276,0.0000030672468,0.06316969,0.000081699945,0.00021993343,0.91655666,0.007712883,0.0068457704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018146996,0.000023587863,0.008239947,0.0000059126746,0.000026785752,0.000001497577,0.027284522,0.000037197387,0.00007075643,0.0057618604,0.9583291,0.000037379177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00820454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010518432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018421804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008813796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081104201","doi":"10.3968/11715","title":"Financial Innovation of the Chinese Financial Markets: New Types of Chattel Pledges","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pledge; China; Autonomy; Interpretation (philosophy); Business; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Finance; Law and economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03400502259633601,"score_gpt":0.3548956872955426,"score_spread":0.3208906646992066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081104201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744829,0.0002558747,0.00008002834,0.015883742,0.00006800427,0.00027008404,0.000029180064,0.000029961448,0.008900257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827105,0.00011526481,0.00035467412,0.00036699427,0.00018200891,0.000011292627,0.000028030023,0.000004662801,0.0006660354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991505,0.00009827353,0.00033272846,0.000106757,0.00020368189,0.00010804246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870163,0.00008187284,0.00032262964,0.0003450143,0.0005179611,0.000030874704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027563467,0.00007743034,0.00013301239,0.000017475075,0.00054884504,0.00006524998,0.0007860623,0.000088247296,0.000057524554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002141157,0.00005325673,0.000068850226,0.0011054549,0.0005484965,0.00036226222,0.00020156341,0.00015983071,0.000008699383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012018637,0.00011561068,0.058475204,0.00007029835,0.000017140213,6.0653015e-8,0.034750346,0.000113473,0.017719362,0.84625024,0.010998966,0.03136912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045542113,0.00002670541,0.72291476,0.000046346726,0.000016207961,2.1994711e-7,0.00056745944,0.00013304394,0.003577147,0.0138075445,0.2582962,0.00015894514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092957786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060996244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8324427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033557895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002730644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4221328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081346637","doi":"10.46985/jms.v4i1.189","title":"The Rule of Causa Proxima as a Principle of Insurance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kathmandu School of Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Proximate and ultimate causation; Phrase; Subject matter; Subject (documents); Political science; Latin Americans; Kingdom; Order (exchange); Insurance law; History; Law; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Insurance policy; Computer science; General insurance; Linguistics; Finance","score_opus":0.023340616356035137,"score_gpt":0.34930388626714765,"score_spread":0.3259632699111125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081346637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26891956,0.09406697,0.00013221486,0.010512412,0.00018053078,0.0030811944,0.00005854044,0.000059035312,0.62298954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97642356,0.021940967,0.00033090563,0.0003086088,0.00006552451,0.000067542715,0.0000016028873,0.000006752348,0.00085455336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987456,0.00016325933,0.00047794715,0.00012451079,0.0003369086,0.00015172698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986989,0.00016045517,0.00041866608,0.0004166609,0.00022434366,0.0000810062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014969812,0.00007346128,0.0003134676,0.000009369557,0.00020887809,0.000012714366,0.00043005397,0.000039892348,0.00009226835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006146406,0.000048396112,0.00012483228,0.00022080027,0.0003616899,0.000101033474,0.00006282064,0.00009434349,0.000049290957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031343955,0.00004448525,0.0011288982,0.0006479408,0.0000111375875,7.8666154e-8,0.00014528699,7.247678e-7,0.00018662204,0.9943241,0.00022687654,0.003280756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010701343,0.000031352873,0.0034933304,0.00091530936,0.000021964826,4.2562428e-7,0.000015453961,0.0000024804738,0.0006003663,0.0041762874,0.99057794,0.000058062353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001531505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004136441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017892145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015155766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23151878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081928491","doi":"","title":"Correcting Corrections: Resolving Confusion Over the Public Correction Requirement in the Ontario Securities Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pleading; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Statutory interpretation; Economic Justice; Statutory law; Legislative history; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Legislative intent; Confusion; Damages; Economics; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03664862055074099,"score_gpt":0.29538488605911795,"score_spread":0.258736265508377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081928491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8829146,0.0017185794,0.0044193272,0.07391144,0.002526438,0.00094053394,0.0000017902271,0.000109445165,0.03345786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953681,0.0010352357,0.000006623884,0.0012214704,0.0008065766,0.00003064387,0.0000025161808,0.000009806284,0.0015190318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997398,0.00044099696,0.00029949506,0.00018083665,0.0004920973,0.0011885528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992126,0.00028536405,0.00020232785,0.00013309128,0.000094319796,0.00007226962],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038273532,0.00010916734,0.00010857656,0.000051072297,0.0025529708,0.00047620584,0.0005106076,0.00006516141,0.00016939409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046404256,0.00007168963,0.00009772896,0.0005355342,0.00011721881,0.00040768535,0.000054277123,0.0024032888,0.000016793614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006980638,0.0001678493,0.04651826,0.0000048117467,0.000083807994,0.0000045570932,0.24048518,0.00016116246,0.00009668347,0.62256014,0.0075765005,0.08227126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045634594,0.00020409706,0.007861842,0.000036977162,0.00003441572,0.000116864525,0.26142055,0.0008392937,0.000015594256,0.023624273,0.70516187,0.0002278775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05083676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7764242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7255875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002096324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030502558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082177200","doi":"","title":"Leapfrogging, Risk and Unjust Enrichment in Canada after Moore v. Sweet","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Leapfrogging; Law; Statutory law; High Court; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.00791575204045654,"score_gpt":0.23776174819922616,"score_spread":0.2298459961587696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082177200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746368,0.0024344989,0.00054059277,0.018667052,0.000054914402,0.00012915712,0.000007569703,0.000012668573,0.003516779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946615,0.0042841546,0.000021853384,0.0005259071,0.00022740623,0.000007547171,6.48721e-7,0.000006102642,0.00026488],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842715,0.00007803,0.00014784005,0.0001321273,0.00021912853,0.0009957115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996701,0.000025258563,0.00006997845,0.00005047505,0.000022134333,0.00016208294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052514987,0.00006812819,0.000088685345,0.00001964121,0.00027218106,0.000050642608,0.00015125523,0.00002692355,0.000061021638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041999258,0.00006240532,0.000023447246,0.00017246227,0.000037256414,0.00012059236,0.000030422561,0.000905811,0.000006905189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006824177,0.000057348498,0.47471848,0.000009328661,0.000087898625,0.000026478237,0.014620491,0.0002692956,0.000044782206,0.45010066,0.0014713876,0.058525607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001470883,0.00021551053,0.090290934,0.000027574262,0.00007575013,0.000030689524,0.071679,0.00073583936,0.000024250847,0.12465849,0.7101657,0.00062538957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8352652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7086943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015446795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006676926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082782546","doi":"","title":"Unjust Enrichment in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lloyd's maritime and commercial law quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Political science; Restitution; Law","score_opus":0.017384686461279848,"score_gpt":0.2464663517464606,"score_spread":0.22908166528518073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082782546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3676465,0.0002567616,0.00012892342,0.120710075,0.00023177962,0.0006850846,0.00008797091,0.00009377199,0.51015913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917198,0.000018516908,0.000054766126,0.0077629997,0.00021644011,0.000025811376,0.00000887539,0.0000066180614,0.00018621454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907124,0.000080847516,0.00018091024,0.00019338452,0.00020274358,0.00027088224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956256,0.00006181647,0.000032983873,0.00009358657,0.000023112174,0.00022591029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009901007,0.00008863358,0.0001455089,0.000010352873,0.00034571553,0.000083368715,0.00018666814,0.00004341116,0.00018885569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006403591,0.00009545972,0.00002528002,0.00016582242,0.00009205441,0.0001594971,0.000025611736,0.00014425561,0.00002640311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015815742,0.000041609128,0.008572022,0.000010586483,0.0000073575516,0.00001484284,0.0070511615,0.000001249707,0.000022260676,0.9232019,0.0027034602,0.05835769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004022068,0.00011515896,0.021560851,0.00000984238,0.000011698457,4.5398107e-7,0.005903336,0.000098511824,0.000007649347,0.0047182916,0.96693385,0.0002381413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012931328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003827189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38927343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083866835","doi":"10.29252/jfr.16.1.1","title":"The Requirements of Introducing the Common Property System to the Iranian Matrimonial Regime with a view to the Quebec Matrimonial Regime","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Convention; Political science; Law; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.13619142389959168,"score_gpt":0.4032527318822306,"score_spread":0.26706130798263894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083866835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27343136,0.00079270423,0.00023658012,0.7143997,0.0002182835,0.002385494,0.0000118641265,0.00001848741,0.008505516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947679,0.00017032227,0.00012977213,0.0011003374,0.0020679825,0.000057840112,2.581219e-7,0.000019698946,0.0016858947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994526,0.0017361006,0.0006329908,0.00022648649,0.0023336974,0.0005446891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971155,0.0006800795,0.0003587696,0.00066382403,0.0009065222,0.0002753218],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01088248,0.00012933029,0.00028424617,0.00006091612,0.0027545174,0.00058612216,0.0027594434,0.00005507144,0.000007527577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006589637,0.00004145035,0.00013036057,0.0015118927,0.00047058405,0.00016841042,0.00040269832,0.0009102512,0.000080067424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047237175,0.00030523204,0.0025018856,0.00032810878,0.00060698134,0.00007459817,0.19391316,0.0018123891,0.012017251,0.11762828,0.5741704,0.09191802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003187269,0.00049686263,0.0030623905,0.00025408223,0.000040577932,0.000011648278,0.040762544,0.00014404881,0.0001386078,0.00007274673,0.95460314,0.00009464925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02630922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023188658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72133654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034475917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012048046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084267595","doi":"","title":"A legal study on Malaysian contract law: economic duress and doctrine of unconscionability / Nur Liyana Mohd Norizam, Nurul Izzah Mohd Nazri and Puteri Farahwati Faizan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Law; Doctrine; Statute; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Political science; Statutory law; Legal doctrine; Freedom of contract; Order (exchange); Comparative law; Severability; Commercial law; Private law; Privity of contract; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management","score_opus":0.020547316958037066,"score_gpt":0.3235676737044657,"score_spread":0.30302035674642863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084267595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95249563,0.00005638206,0.00004662543,0.0020220003,0.00014297025,0.00082559657,0.000056394667,0.000048588172,0.04430582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986778,0.000025558156,0.00013461529,0.00014261538,0.00022375117,0.00005077899,0.0000045257625,0.00001016032,0.0007302273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862015,0.00014194332,0.00034617525,0.0003386886,0.00019091525,0.00036213762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990706,0.00016309439,0.00013093892,0.00030444723,0.000052075262,0.0002788669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005958113,0.00016692278,0.0002973998,0.000046698387,0.0004021224,0.000105363346,0.00020160315,0.000087138695,0.00017723803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036094432,0.0001422802,0.000052254036,0.000098158285,0.0003736743,0.00050376164,0.000098138014,0.00013704576,0.000019371937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003537882,0.00058044447,0.19082159,0.000013810647,0.00004225441,9.3403435e-7,0.004716301,0.0000096894055,0.00018791136,0.80241346,0.00008181352,0.0010964232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021781211,0.00046026276,0.8719344,0.000021732058,0.00010022336,0.000006681636,0.013041108,0.00039710625,0.000637363,0.0028591843,0.1077315,0.0006322991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029059282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018257992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7995543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009642201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088380926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084586269","doi":"","title":"Relevance of Contract Law Solutions Under a Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Opinio Juris in Comparatione","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Equity (law); Civil code; Law; Obligation; Relevance (law); Severability; Civil law (Civil law); Duty; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Exclusion clause; Business; Public law; Economics; Contract management; Privity of contract; Computer science","score_opus":0.1581769974384676,"score_gpt":0.3854013803826011,"score_spread":0.22722438294413347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084586269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22070633,0.0016506185,0.06455028,0.12256239,0.00052856596,0.0018060836,0.00014147838,0.00033427312,0.58772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980789,0.00015209339,0.00067748415,0.0006879102,0.0001438968,0.000026722812,0.000013049835,0.00000378439,0.0002161534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924123,0.00007036356,0.00024367493,0.00013389754,0.00016335008,0.00014751064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.00017629511,0.000087625616,0.00010676028,0.0000576682,0.00006889229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019992175,0.000050366107,0.00013321673,0.00001565054,0.00021498051,0.000024441251,0.00015759293,0.000046611916,0.00012139321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005969154,0.000054156302,0.000033525233,0.0002786599,0.0001816595,0.0001553925,0.00002590539,0.00011189684,0.00011054522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007712017,0.00005658972,0.001549521,0.000004638531,0.000004950185,1.2865492e-7,0.0028656647,0.0013181784,0.00050575484,0.99088556,0.0026300491,0.00017128132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055290014,0.00003233217,0.011929207,0.00002513373,0.000007883444,2.6712107e-7,0.00079940975,0.0035357897,0.00016349011,0.012245065,0.97055304,0.00015549375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012231974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005490922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97864044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044945027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013635229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30640632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084730852","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0060","title":"Bureaucracy without alienation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Bureaucracy; Relevance (law); Statutory law; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Administrative law; Hegelianism; Deliberative democracy; Political philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.025055761804479246,"score_gpt":0.27097926936160094,"score_spread":0.2459235075571217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084730852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022882205,0.00014862245,0.005565416,0.017892815,0.00007671162,0.000098371966,0.000007141779,0.000034953344,0.95329374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763185,0.0001661089,0.001207514,0.00017879729,0.00016829939,1.4136726e-8,7.8174025e-7,0.0000017445566,0.0006449065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959344,0.000043016607,0.000053373857,0.000055850516,0.00017270599,0.00008159151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962103,0.000012360562,0.00008333631,0.000038108057,0.00009905913,0.00014610092],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012566402,0.000028075441,0.000058111153,0.0000032218556,0.00072645454,0.000023936582,0.00020166823,0.000028676592,0.0011089621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017338558,0.00003124795,0.00004710322,0.000023206743,0.000112038055,0.0004254554,0.000026240226,0.000061968574,0.000015170137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023178129,0.000033251737,0.00095630175,0.0000031041034,0.00002178254,0.0000048146126,0.030975368,0.00003649916,0.0003293754,0.96000135,0.0037418802,0.0038731014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021438049,0.000022959943,0.0009586485,0.0000043497053,0.000014946533,7.8870266e-7,0.012312179,0.00008939801,0.000022353775,0.000557033,0.98575723,0.000045718487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06961567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09230404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113348025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057883655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3085937296","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0040","title":"Office-holding and officiality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Law; Jurisprudence; Orthodoxy; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Subject (documents); Philosophy of law; Private law; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03044656825647138,"score_gpt":0.25779265439418997,"score_spread":0.2273460861377186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3085937296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20749912,0.00036921105,0.0020927088,0.010028887,0.00007841224,0.00010138646,0.000014284074,0.000035337645,0.7797807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844676,0.00031368478,0.0008467281,0.000119456665,0.00013616087,5.9193006e-9,2.6353678e-7,0.0000013954243,0.0001355245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963206,0.000045876586,0.00005381297,0.00006189439,0.00012266629,0.00008367438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999658,0.000022358057,0.000067292225,0.000033213943,0.000056718876,0.00016240697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016725485,0.000028190736,0.00006612607,0.0000025730517,0.0008479544,0.000027409156,0.00014475077,0.000029007002,0.00064099213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019181905,0.000032368716,0.000035695302,0.000019635723,0.00016642676,0.00027316535,0.00004405901,0.00006711019,0.0000045881907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004849926,0.000035557292,0.0011455595,0.00000918837,0.000025873362,0.000008443956,0.029835658,0.000016759885,0.00047114847,0.9587606,0.0016094517,0.008033218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020535148,0.000024947225,0.0034541204,0.00000743806,0.000017585176,0.0000011563862,0.0208776,0.000052942243,0.00001662168,0.00021365043,0.9750721,0.000056500947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08036886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10851489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97346264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073451345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052111565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.925755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087416689","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6416","title":"Discrimination and the Private Law in Canada: Reflections on Spence v. BMO Trust Co.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Law; Legislation; Political science; Sexual orientation; Testamentary trust; Multiculturalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.09651350401140332,"score_gpt":0.3755349907071687,"score_spread":0.27902148669576543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087416689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45316267,0.000038903778,0.00021833401,0.11571407,0.00012288138,0.0010016356,0.000034089826,0.0000280463,0.42967936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962297,0.000029296742,0.00009364684,0.0033256703,0.0001262059,0.000027789076,0.0000012236204,0.000004965193,0.00016151369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927115,0.000067300265,0.00014808035,0.00014989226,0.00023277027,0.00013077905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995273,0.0001747351,0.00006276691,0.00010731577,0.00003591227,0.000091976995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019561246,0.0000547367,0.00009904797,0.000020821939,0.00024169378,0.00007398135,0.00032573688,0.00002231463,0.000044307744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002016959,0.00004326331,0.000014195158,0.00027589122,0.00016056845,0.00017086619,0.00006825445,0.00011151586,0.000009383824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007046145,0.000019123665,0.0014001186,0.00003262476,0.0000051879924,0.00000126902,0.008215891,0.00037346903,0.00016226922,0.9883358,0.00081936107,0.0005644499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026471429,0.00016098919,0.33470327,0.00021863871,0.0002820708,0.0000010702687,0.030013626,0.002004025,0.0030521124,0.010106818,0.61610836,0.00070192287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6889803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8275081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011204226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002809973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31309083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088546058","doi":"","title":"Sprott Bid Structure Ruled Golden: Targets Lose War over Proxy Battle — Central Gold Trust v. Sprott Asset Management","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tender offer; Issuer; Business; Accounting; Commission; Asset (computer security); Corporation; Law; Finance; Law and economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Political science; Shareholder; Computer security","score_opus":0.006214888292619296,"score_gpt":0.25999465709865704,"score_spread":0.25377976880603775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088546058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92106354,0.0021506771,0.006673775,0.031489305,0.0013023859,0.003367,0.00015382226,0.00030215224,0.03349732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976301,0.0026905495,0.0002953819,0.00014549949,0.0011902488,0.00004230598,0.0000064836813,0.000034100296,0.019294428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561447,0.00014397068,0.00035017758,0.00036523872,0.00063800404,0.0028881435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990755,0.000044382177,0.0002284872,0.00028915724,0.00008687381,0.00027561918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097124773,0.00022511181,0.00021028618,0.000092101545,0.0006204745,0.00013273595,0.0006820257,0.00014362812,0.0008014724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059508173,0.00015526719,0.00016588824,0.00028778473,0.0001593086,0.00044173433,0.00009148213,0.000899281,0.00013159489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006959302,0.00017842426,0.012976139,0.000018228571,0.000282525,0.000014010102,0.00079618266,0.000009888688,0.0021355005,0.9471602,0.007038648,0.029320672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020265463,0.00017435726,0.018251246,0.00006736457,0.000100516285,0.000045636738,0.0022362713,0.000026422285,0.0006619383,0.21793854,0.75788355,0.00058761484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031411037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002764316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7508449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001739227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012408447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8775561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090799164","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0062","title":"Contracts, markets, and justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contract theory; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Sociology; Position (finance); Social contract; Law; Distributive property; Economics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.018782845608439687,"score_gpt":0.2456214040471554,"score_spread":0.22683855843871573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090799164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026805691,0.0010873888,0.0014938029,0.01827073,0.00009078405,0.00009179838,0.000014264807,0.000023072113,0.95212245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673814,0.0012157515,0.0011732094,0.0002653015,0.00015685889,8.052103e-9,2.7034704e-7,0.0000014341246,0.0004490305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996686,0.000044499968,0.000045337474,0.00005258199,0.000107800515,0.00008120208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996279,0.000038754042,0.00005995292,0.000028806671,0.000059635066,0.00018497703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014337177,0.000026535616,0.000058956684,0.0000020626037,0.00073822605,0.00002589785,0.000132959,0.000027315298,0.00082460535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027668806,0.000029630264,0.000026840651,0.000013031517,0.00015271197,0.00029534494,0.00003039954,0.00006660534,0.00000423044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007264425,0.000031613687,0.00029996733,0.000012074147,0.000032221007,0.000019164754,0.02064233,0.000005125867,0.00023015519,0.9635096,0.007327101,0.007818001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023104307,0.000016192822,0.0021451048,0.0000047735994,0.000042045715,0.0000019878273,0.01834009,0.000048872527,0.000004682089,0.00017232163,0.978954,0.00003883971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030278314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045191366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97162694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005453937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044219203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9761791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093834217","doi":"10.4324/9781003122609-10","title":"Recovering Misdirected Money from Banks: Ministerial Receipt at Law and in Equity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Equity (law); Business; Economics; Financial system; Law and economics; Monetary economics; Law; Accounting; Political science","score_opus":0.0606704291982241,"score_gpt":0.31152468141192236,"score_spread":0.2508542522136983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093834217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019251574,0.00014976232,0.000006943902,0.002714891,0.00021514103,0.00030634005,0.00021432237,0.00009629478,0.9943712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14528435,0.0012249723,0.0014896529,0.0024448384,0.0016961346,0.000042883552,0.00026363696,0.00007189288,0.8474816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988391,0.000029836783,0.00027226208,0.00043395374,0.00023494441,0.00018990485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993873,0.00012938985,0.00010802705,0.00018306095,0.000026915808,0.00016526534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015231021,0.00016966618,0.00028281592,0.000023818084,0.00026774558,0.00013553798,0.0002243905,0.0003092975,0.0022979642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000385687,0.00017587263,0.00006128686,0.0000344092,0.00019898317,0.00009149179,0.00042470265,0.00020774017,0.00015556853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099580924,0.000012808654,0.000027177222,0.00001660145,0.000032876957,0.000011804674,0.002081729,6.562882e-7,0.00060457125,0.98896873,0.0035084286,0.004635027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016647608,0.000012176826,0.00006613108,0.000045055454,0.000016724742,1.7299773e-7,0.00004965912,0.000009938709,0.00007075991,0.026326368,0.9730111,0.0002254484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016935475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12183177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021459704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009104218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094153324","doi":"","title":"Il Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: common law e varianti locali nel Commonwealth","year":2015,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commonwealth; Political science","score_opus":0.17861348282601838,"score_gpt":0.3260932734812705,"score_spread":0.1474797906552521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094153324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12138087,0.0002072802,0.012541993,0.019844543,0.0011309399,0.0028864301,0.0022098625,0.00011889017,0.8396792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998613,0.000063788095,0.0002739964,0.00017174245,0.00016297765,0.0000040030163,0.00007948104,0.0000076096912,0.00062340655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927537,0.00095847016,0.00083627726,0.00024946182,0.004626335,0.0005757976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245524,0.000358711,0.00082078145,0.0007987453,0.0050866827,0.00047980942],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007842496,0.00021537406,0.00053939177,0.0002326517,0.0034857586,0.00013460107,0.0019216758,0.00034137935,0.000103187274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038507362,0.00021001967,0.00023049953,0.0017985012,0.0042464235,0.0021020265,0.0009663702,0.00080572255,0.00036893573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016426072,0.00013284464,0.0010761301,0.00033706316,0.00007834437,0.0000032511446,0.015881313,0.002523175,0.000014524551,0.94669443,0.032669675,0.0004249965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002160764,0.00016203118,0.008991338,0.0005864584,0.00007228505,0.000013670998,0.08275064,0.01246628,0.000032234195,0.0014654776,0.8910273,0.00027156342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11319458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006519005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94522893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029461863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008527708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094427520","doi":"","title":"REFORMING SECTION 89 OF THE INDIAN ACT: TINKER, WAIVER, SOLDIER (ON), SIGH?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Waiver; Parliament; Supreme court; Law; Tinker; Political science; Situated; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; History; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016934770965656605,"score_gpt":0.2710840939394996,"score_spread":0.254149322973843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094427520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94264996,0.00026286193,0.00049966254,0.03096393,0.00026855597,0.0002542228,0.0000037222846,0.000037675796,0.025059422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967441,0.00058111513,0.000011786565,0.000389642,0.0008315165,0.0000029896441,4.0150178e-7,0.00000796005,0.0014304664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985813,0.000082797174,0.00016418619,0.000104949046,0.00029858918,0.0007681971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957883,0.00003077457,0.00016972983,0.00008042679,0.00005447427,0.00008574471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007337158,0.000065208354,0.00008416381,0.00002296802,0.0007977209,0.000034548564,0.00034819244,0.000062055326,0.00006495905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009819857,0.000044402943,0.00010610485,0.00028752667,0.00007898556,0.00014920755,0.000037217687,0.0011004999,0.000023976761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003148876,0.000056794543,0.0053988765,0.000005458711,0.00007517273,5.935281e-7,0.01448576,0.00007875799,0.001718821,0.9472457,0.0004180697,0.030484518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012566064,0.00057033164,0.007411739,0.000065229055,0.00010295545,0.000049390248,0.05412768,0.00017648746,0.0029582365,0.21182355,0.7209505,0.0005073331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044310998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003713279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73542213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036733045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015382412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61355054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095154023","doi":"","title":"‘Measure Once, Cut Twice’: Weyerhaeuser Company Ltd. v. Ontario (Attorney General) and the Interpretation of Indemnities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Appeal; Law; Context (archaeology); Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); English law; Political science; Business; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.012482452578748781,"score_gpt":0.27426840499478833,"score_spread":0.2617859524160395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095154023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94435215,0.0011609634,0.005252256,0.006138259,0.00019970107,0.00025251778,0.0000028004677,0.000021706772,0.042619664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944419,0.0007090838,0.00007097372,0.00020520002,0.00050579984,0.000007658453,9.20202e-7,0.0000074072636,0.0040510083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840957,0.00020953009,0.0002363511,0.00011297556,0.00030011375,0.00073146157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930173,0.000081665734,0.00019804691,0.00011808785,0.00023550475,0.000064948945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020429783,0.00008545423,0.00014725773,0.000044038672,0.00082337455,0.00010341005,0.00031191125,0.000060541395,0.000073156545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069017995,0.00005924406,0.00007072794,0.00013050351,0.00081782654,0.00021986173,0.00004134685,0.0007693234,0.000011681537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074268966,0.000021571599,0.0044264346,0.0000013525612,0.00007194212,9.678444e-8,0.022968931,0.000004001015,0.000063062085,0.96777844,0.0001593928,0.004430504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027055277,0.00044168034,0.012514805,0.000074860975,0.0001747898,0.000069058144,0.040888805,0.0008251392,0.00015126358,0.6071969,0.33455208,0.00040506572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029131196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6175262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.588395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005769257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028620237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9773339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096731131","doi":"10.3138/9781487532314","title":"Corporate Cataclysm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.057510100674922196,"score_gpt":0.24779631201189425,"score_spread":0.19028621133697204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096731131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004187784,0.00041846483,0.00010474565,0.0001341998,0.000077056415,0.00029589247,0.00018212915,0.00007414612,0.9987092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004325822,0.00036160872,0.00028302148,0.000036065005,0.00017658291,3.0680465e-7,0.000034853932,0.000011375994,0.9986636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920493,0.00004940969,0.000098803386,0.00023565524,0.0002604266,0.00015080033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991059,0.000036860834,0.00033519178,0.0002458049,0.0001139372,0.00016233194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008277685,0.00011611656,0.00022522417,0.0000065897634,0.0003223242,0.000021350086,0.00064063614,0.0002126433,0.00038512965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008308198,0.00015041967,0.00012544634,0.0000014672622,0.00038428287,0.00009047122,0.00020414837,0.00014155322,0.000028023462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020579811,0.000012177099,0.000002379338,0.000045209552,0.000069563466,0.000013787159,0.022858482,0.0000016508383,0.000014701748,0.80002755,0.17408356,0.0028503402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012097958,0.000015156535,0.000008506077,0.000027343684,0.00007885586,8.805112e-8,0.0002459624,0.0000062008967,0.00001122942,0.001190627,0.9981476,0.00014743421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32160205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15215352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8240641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003784537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067585247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8633175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099602470","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.5","title":"Kantian Perspectives on Private Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Kantian ethics; Law; Epistemology; Private law; Philosophy of law; Morality; Adjudication; Natural (archaeology); Natural law; Independence (probability theory); Positive law; Philosophy; Political science; Virtue; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.049287639518884575,"score_gpt":0.3346212654521303,"score_spread":0.2853336259332457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099602470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005069742,0.0004781743,0.00007322285,0.015489698,0.0002238905,0.0003073912,0.000078261684,0.00018919464,0.9831095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18485583,0.059402727,0.0008771386,0.002974493,0.0048810774,0.00008612291,0.00013865138,0.000057942296,0.74672604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869627,0.000073530784,0.00014526305,0.00041005106,0.00040958132,0.00026531055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937516,0.00006979791,0.000086149645,0.00023961373,0.00004893857,0.00018036379],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010196059,0.00015827402,0.00021256546,0.00003029435,0.0005958117,0.0001845945,0.00047942612,0.00023533554,0.001608888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005509093,0.00013185633,0.00012633794,0.00020186332,0.0002514915,0.00006831606,0.000089957204,0.00044019846,0.001222459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017983041,0.00003201112,0.000004456515,0.000011214976,0.000018358538,0.000001393978,0.0041199736,1.9609287e-7,1.67087e-7,0.87594575,0.11764468,0.0022200225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005008106,0.000020781072,0.000024913965,0.00004423571,0.000016471768,7.7043495e-8,0.005341921,0.0000016973975,0.000005529883,0.0044565857,0.9898603,0.00017743144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042324173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019469834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87221557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013846827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022636882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106125075","doi":"","title":"Arbitration as Ius Gentium: A Scholastic Theory of Arbitration","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Scholasticism; Law; Political science; Compulsory arbitration; Natural (archaeology); Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.02087825030984097,"score_gpt":0.2924313493908887,"score_spread":0.27155309908104774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106125075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7308408,0.0017032195,0.12910652,0.023527207,0.00020691629,0.0005303375,0.000005584589,0.000103441766,0.11397596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974843,0.00094301754,0.0001243747,0.00054456154,0.0003876329,0.0000054538887,0.0000024630624,0.000008174153,0.0005000142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984654,0.00016577236,0.00023458028,0.0001231709,0.00031191515,0.0006991312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994634,0.000056790424,0.00017742321,0.000071466864,0.000114882976,0.00011604219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014449842,0.00006862388,0.00009674143,0.000034385925,0.00043586097,0.00008051379,0.00022478422,0.000058330443,0.00011204076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029416164,0.00006453921,0.00008295589,0.00026611376,0.00008342033,0.00030210393,0.00001466614,0.0008440597,0.00007553956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026786449,0.000028030232,0.00012841336,0.000002464213,0.00002863005,3.6232302e-7,0.0019258865,0.000039227823,0.0029485635,0.99270195,0.000028176544,0.00214153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034970918,0.00023919324,0.00041536812,0.0000098486635,0.000054397824,0.000014349054,0.009444213,0.0002005895,0.0007052402,0.9721618,0.01627492,0.00013032388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017059482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090355973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2666435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002453489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028969483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5139062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106701806","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850397.003.0023","title":"Mandatory Family Protection in the Common Law Tradition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Abandonment (legal); Spouse; Law; Common law; Political science; Family law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Discretion; Genealogy; Geography; History","score_opus":0.08384297433496068,"score_gpt":0.2922736159509626,"score_spread":0.2084306416160019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106701806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000050508268,0.000033969798,0.00012809236,0.011851348,0.000049380305,0.0007254593,0.000018651666,0.00005724911,0.98708534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8273951,0.0001250094,0.000052995252,0.007280004,0.0008697269,0.00019434364,0.0000649102,0.000023482049,0.16399445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993369,0.000043576318,0.00013877942,0.00015492366,0.0002452431,0.000080586164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997264,0.00003120659,0.000060612467,0.00013226276,0.000015979147,0.00003354234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025933166,0.00008280063,0.000096307325,0.000020101006,0.00033471925,0.00007282423,0.00021843886,0.00014880588,0.00016307073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027295184,0.00006223873,0.00005814069,0.00003546622,0.0001469055,0.000078969344,0.000015099831,0.00032760733,0.00021350919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016886459,0.0000068045347,3.993725e-7,0.000004366313,0.0000024943017,0.0000012697333,0.000979699,4.7352032e-7,0.000007397477,0.99523157,0.0021848956,0.0015789266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037882448,0.00001239591,0.000058109275,0.0000112788475,0.000006409599,2.1783286e-7,0.00039494204,0.00000812468,0.0000018129587,0.18130593,0.81809217,0.00007073372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005860242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013692427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8273446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007816583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063150444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88589716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106859394","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0067","title":"Ownership and offices: the building blocks of the legal order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Legitimacy; Order (exchange); Possession (linguistics); Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Property rights; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0216388014336906,"score_gpt":0.24339178786570423,"score_spread":0.22175298643201363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106859394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49748525,0.0009056401,0.0012443863,0.075382024,0.0001640062,0.00026060408,0.000017491351,0.000019746636,0.42452085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987916,0.00010771658,0.00039632095,0.00015978747,0.00009395808,1.411296e-8,5.381911e-8,0.000001332683,0.00044922088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999571,0.00007047557,0.000060298258,0.00005134326,0.00016770305,0.00007917907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999625,0.000047239828,0.00011458615,0.000061127306,0.00008439605,0.000067606736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020807773,0.000030594736,0.000059703692,0.0000020835616,0.0010107892,0.000026980486,0.00036585447,0.000025929852,0.00025810782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030563053,0.00001952099,0.000049147464,0.000043201686,0.00036776013,0.00018966838,0.00008153889,0.000101861806,3.9016362e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029202407,0.000025897441,0.0013920885,0.000007271093,0.000045360706,0.0000017077496,0.0383061,0.00009869134,0.0006834819,0.95578116,0.0017370373,0.0018920084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019846972,0.00002013105,0.0017320685,0.000013242574,0.00003720056,0.0000020980135,0.037550487,0.000093268405,0.000072585506,0.00027426684,0.9599638,0.000042402437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0684041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10007118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95822674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004203429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007913704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93779945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107289713","doi":"10.4324/9781003122616-4","title":"The Reason for Restitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0694969736757026,"score_gpt":0.33487833336941486,"score_spread":0.26538135969371224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107289713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.9975073e-7,0.00014057057,0.0013495298,0.03360568,0.00010193056,0.00042636416,0.000017833656,0.000058672278,0.9642992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017285803,0.00047305174,0.0003060715,0.00027551904,0.0007652859,0.000040725638,0.000013907041,0.000008082103,0.9963888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957544,0.000005070307,0.00008437065,0.00011953193,0.00013061914,0.00008496792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995911,0.00013134927,0.000052768097,0.000116796014,0.000055504384,0.000052453015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017135209,0.00005331954,0.000055380464,0.000005003584,0.00097323634,0.00008068021,0.00018423279,0.00009816872,0.00008818067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007999202,0.000035566016,0.00006937677,0.000011087847,0.00015809658,0.00002601254,0.00002365878,0.00008234032,0.00017896094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019961935,6.1173176e-7,1.6266185e-7,0.0000014605351,0.000004054331,6.7211374e-8,0.00008481044,1.8260221e-7,6.8217133e-7,0.956625,0.036576476,0.0067045046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017415301,0.0000050332997,0.0000013071276,0.0000046657483,0.000008444521,3.034595e-8,0.00003936157,0.0000081498965,0.0000012206332,0.21957615,0.78029567,0.000042543426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028985826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023817306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7437192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048901387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016486467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7485446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108520199","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0100","title":"The question of fairness in contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Argument (complex analysis); Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; State (computer science); Political science; Law enforcement; Rule of law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016863510070994417,"score_gpt":0.27115745184663353,"score_spread":0.25429394177563913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108520199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11611901,0.0007680076,0.0017292892,0.024123685,0.00013832218,0.00022149357,0.000015146812,0.000019099558,0.85686594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994045,0.0002698744,0.00013321357,0.000051063493,0.00004950342,1.9411333e-8,2.1828811e-7,9.72373e-7,0.000090646194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995941,0.00008576376,0.000075287506,0.000038797738,0.00013237304,0.00007367303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996657,0.000054123302,0.00010048038,0.00003811032,0.00007818175,0.00006343582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029356347,0.00002283094,0.00006173891,0.0000020688005,0.0005160607,0.000015763997,0.0002163744,0.0000266436,0.0001379951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019209223,0.00002022596,0.00003948408,0.000022772268,0.00023843697,0.000252669,0.000021583337,0.000071917835,0.0000015775151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002382513,0.000016046053,0.00042782185,0.0000015259949,0.000005520486,0.0000018372173,0.0066786865,0.000023812378,0.00010738204,0.9913685,0.00009921212,0.0012458336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005030497,0.00004952302,0.008344994,0.000022864127,0.000015900167,9.4052587e-7,0.0272706,0.00014443943,0.00008869461,0.0029280633,0.96056837,0.00006258954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30248407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65224105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98844045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098387354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051095543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7021608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108774314","doi":"10.1017/lst.2020.38","title":"An analysis of three distinct approaches to using defamation to protect corporate reputation from Australia, England and Wales, and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Welsh; Disadvantage; Law; Corporate law; English law; Political science; Business; Corporate governance; History; Finance","score_opus":0.3751401205529468,"score_gpt":0.34647645570874536,"score_spread":0.028663664844201464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108774314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99352485,0.00007625719,0.0025017275,0.0034135298,0.000013128652,0.00032995208,0.00008011675,0.000011440474,0.00004902747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804246,0.0000045190454,0.0017690066,0.00006632279,0.00006650897,0.00002293088,0.00001290731,0.0000029377313,0.000012431844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993499,0.000048335292,0.00014447914,0.00020225867,0.00016138154,0.00009362359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996147,0.000051508134,0.00009660716,0.000063985055,0.000058447706,0.000114740295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014401696,0.00006479228,0.0001789076,0.000028206214,0.00028591487,0.000059373568,0.000056595192,0.000019816964,0.0000026191171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012932268,0.000057727208,0.000013749793,0.0003804298,0.000064019696,0.00011307204,0.00004307963,0.000036416317,2.5340285e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009904276,0.00004608662,0.8438053,0.000080724094,0.0010428563,0.0000054282245,0.10410526,0.01333591,0.0019864028,0.02377053,0.0001178278,0.011604642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023055414,0.00011350187,0.96357447,0.000022910981,0.00066694134,1.5381684e-7,0.014074062,0.012138202,0.00035927683,0.0015342707,0.0069936425,0.00029202382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87718767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9829423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11976916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000601309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005837362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23540471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109455559","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0068","title":"Private law offices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Representation (politics); Private law; Commercial law; Business; Identity (music); Task (project management); Political science; Public law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.022886487446781616,"score_gpt":0.2503122336098992,"score_spread":0.22742574616311756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109455559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021660019,0.00020533628,0.00085701724,0.009596293,0.000062904444,0.00006750415,0.000009335495,0.000030216943,0.96751136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742633,0.0002013022,0.0014252594,0.00032401373,0.00018201997,1.164949e-8,5.1902276e-7,0.0000020479717,0.00043852083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995516,0.00004469741,0.000061397106,0.00006559941,0.00016923764,0.00010750052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996015,0.000017917351,0.000087709064,0.000049383376,0.000064160275,0.00017933449],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000121310884,0.000034106455,0.00007158814,0.000002260059,0.0009736791,0.000033094973,0.00031250063,0.00003225427,0.0014852231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007963751,0.000037413964,0.00006200446,0.000022758055,0.00022413628,0.00042428105,0.00004931667,0.00007709112,0.000022673723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001272777,0.000016787619,0.000095520314,0.000002295081,0.000013277406,0.000004715763,0.008955985,0.000011543873,0.00014896363,0.98901856,0.001122977,0.00059661886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016223668,0.000023748324,0.00027763963,0.0000047886806,0.000012732115,6.7528435e-7,0.0074326824,0.000018991403,0.000034449324,0.0005709431,0.991415,0.000046105684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104048744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20459372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000895697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004440405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110898537","doi":"10.28933/ajlls-2020-02-0505","title":"APPROPRIATION OF PERSONALITY IN THE COMMONWEALTH CARIBBEAN","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law and Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Appropriation; Jurisprudence; Law; Tort; German; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0764802303310552,"score_gpt":0.3708515025709782,"score_spread":0.294371272239923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110898537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89812434,0.0009602241,0.00006104337,0.08740452,0.000024387431,0.00008713005,0.000004806747,0.0000028337513,0.013330734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997538,0.0004054171,0.00015025685,0.001754908,0.00014349008,0.000001351899,1.3176535e-7,0.0000013915369,0.0000051007637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930423,0.00018357823,0.00019334166,0.00004670789,0.0001959049,0.000076237986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944544,0.00015165654,0.00023754133,0.000032366097,0.000091460264,0.000041529933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006474679,0.000036416557,0.0001755425,0.00000889956,0.00019896255,0.000018474262,0.00012075853,0.000007638046,0.0000018339321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008285645,0.000022536502,0.00003710201,0.00016319267,0.00063545856,0.000088290195,0.000018949035,0.000120114375,2.2130664e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003627894,0.000047870213,0.010033074,0.000015792064,0.000053910466,0.000003469464,0.18431224,0.000010233128,0.000029286597,0.7987456,0.0002595635,0.0064527346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041446643,0.0006731331,0.04457452,0.00003095136,0.000058593792,0.0000063191505,0.41941217,0.000020522655,0.000024493569,0.002116723,0.5325523,0.000115816365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012134224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029223724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79662883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018916544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005140411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110964295","doi":"","title":"Transparency and Accountability in Governance in China: Evaluating Legal Reforms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; China; Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.05132374386409874,"score_gpt":0.3215810646158894,"score_spread":0.27025732075179065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110964295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34898964,0.0003327278,0.000029447208,0.002011765,0.00006927897,0.00046057,0.00006645914,0.000015306136,0.6480248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83890826,0.00090715085,0.00018335518,0.000020161842,0.00005116594,6.2178253e-7,0.000011406788,0.000012285261,0.1599056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861443,0.000044621553,0.00025089164,0.00040431766,0.00044400638,0.00024172277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999178,0.00006811924,0.0003282056,0.00027183638,0.000081382204,0.000072477626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082196447,0.00016910359,0.000403936,0.000108352375,0.00020309631,0.000053262465,0.00078479794,0.00027478847,0.0006361139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033334967,0.00019114197,0.00009117839,0.00014365528,0.0003100889,0.0010176287,0.00020447743,0.0004126299,0.0000107819105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018352146,0.00016603348,0.031205075,0.00042899148,0.00004719347,0.00003371581,0.026301093,0.00018357212,0.00007927499,0.87010556,0.00026003006,0.07100595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026134907,0.00010823552,0.71312153,0.0013323361,0.00011450501,0.0000027479848,0.005167996,0.0011348433,0.0000075020807,0.031397264,0.24389887,0.0011006922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10250405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2785208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8387083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035703715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003975937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9034724},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3113173929","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2020-0110","title":"Taking tort seriously","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.029116114515872076,"score_gpt":0.2620778172179014,"score_spread":0.23296170270202934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113173929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032608394,0.00019620135,0.0018201005,0.008621135,0.00008146293,0.000067339046,0.000005645499,0.00003086971,0.95656884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976192,0.00015465965,0.0013317304,0.00020051995,0.00019956025,1.0050162e-8,3.1162418e-7,0.000001928551,0.0004920974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960107,0.000033684308,0.000054503034,0.000057676123,0.00015417745,0.00009891514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996109,0.000011697726,0.00010761271,0.000040703257,0.00006740906,0.00016168991],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000112135865,0.000029532697,0.000063369946,0.0000024865801,0.00084477564,0.000026186139,0.00024526773,0.00002887998,0.0025971893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014765523,0.00003411329,0.000058327023,0.000021794387,0.00010894807,0.00033483357,0.000038903137,0.00006992343,0.000013613293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033348184,0.00003752463,0.0014953581,0.0000058742444,0.000039633527,0.000028194443,0.055139206,0.00004369595,0.00049765763,0.9283493,0.004664799,0.009665392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014725229,0.000022799719,0.0016539722,0.0000051916295,0.000012102235,0.0000015405384,0.01654358,0.000026933863,0.000013074721,0.00014351966,0.98138225,0.000047811653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12044641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17771839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9767174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012833992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074312426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113760480","doi":"","title":"A Generalized Duty of Good Faith in Insolvency Proceedings: Effective or Meaningless?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Insolvency; Legislation; Law; Statutory law; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Fair dealing; Faith; Creditor; Law and economics; Meaning (existential); Business; Good faith; Economics; Debt; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01888511851589504,"score_gpt":0.29487733513939424,"score_spread":0.2759922166234992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113760480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776807,0.0005175384,0.0008338256,0.00621589,0.000038197446,0.00049081544,0.000003011237,0.000035667133,0.014184365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804866,0.0010491099,0.00017506727,0.00012993357,0.0002974252,0.000025260075,5.1376645e-7,0.000010756385,0.00026324423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982538,0.00007172258,0.00025783858,0.00016055163,0.0002785811,0.0009774991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995026,0.000043430162,0.00018949957,0.000041643023,0.00011132182,0.00011152235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011552628,0.000089867055,0.00019115207,0.000051652503,0.00023375805,0.000047217876,0.00031512487,0.000064439744,0.00003860477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002647649,0.00007142768,0.00007496902,0.00058001844,0.00007343877,0.0002243047,0.000036589758,0.0008649568,0.000007607442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102451384,0.00008309669,0.005397756,0.000010971668,0.00004258254,0.0000012787775,0.012886977,0.000014382991,0.001385708,0.9750804,0.000046082412,0.004948354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009942936,0.0038413606,0.014320775,0.00028665632,0.00022181362,0.00009730947,0.15640193,0.0010834072,0.0041088653,0.681566,0.12675615,0.0013727875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008401742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069278707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29351437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000518402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019101024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38659143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114377619","doi":"10.29173/mlj798","title":"Unsettled Estates: Manitoba's Forgotten Statute and the Chupryk Case","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Law; History; Genealogy; Political science","score_opus":0.04643382559597244,"score_gpt":0.2751377337092125,"score_spread":0.22870390811324007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114377619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82075536,0.00030688778,0.00066478434,0.0056927097,0.00047657764,0.00055097946,0.000026415251,0.00008118049,0.17144513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975153,0.00030503643,0.0007437058,0.0007012684,0.00055548106,0.00001966921,0.0000011341185,0.0000141430055,0.00014423576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878037,0.00021463407,0.00025072345,0.00014474062,0.00025469667,0.0003548432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991996,0.00014263773,0.00015126698,0.00017957189,0.0001148992,0.00021202324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011057187,0.00011339704,0.00013952533,0.000029200632,0.0029751875,0.00038005653,0.00030285327,0.000057711422,0.00015624144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004954304,0.00007416319,0.00007889993,0.0001234714,0.0007703376,0.00031513517,0.00007812369,0.00033964464,0.000058499612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006804253,0.000058392558,0.0012966031,0.0000054281268,0.000056784414,0.00067201536,0.01628154,0.000001372995,0.0000063723987,0.9636941,0.0015041882,0.016355181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002401951,0.00007857189,0.0033135246,0.000027946595,0.00015635288,0.0038286694,0.2639014,0.00008824353,0.00005978544,0.15438929,0.5713742,0.0003800671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1529341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5984224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8093048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074814125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065361295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115069690","doi":"","title":"Good faith in contractual performance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review: Selected Conference Papers: Journal of the Judicial Commission of New South Wales, The","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fair dealing; Doctrine; Law; Duty; Faith; Political science; Estoppel; Common law; Good faith; Bad faith; Uniform Commercial Code; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03643751600118068,"score_gpt":0.29711086956012617,"score_spread":0.2606733535589455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115069690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5435747,0.026240394,0.00070449215,0.26780835,0.0020353696,0.0045363866,0.00008621538,0.000116374365,0.15489775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98094857,0.016504142,0.000050609,0.00071907556,0.00067352917,0.0000080714135,6.150031e-7,0.000016012153,0.0010793597],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633145,0.00079260796,0.0011620898,0.00020405166,0.0010492651,0.00046052138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661595,0.00047902777,0.0014697468,0.00041673513,0.0007547487,0.00026377765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019686476,0.00023081747,0.0006645092,0.000092416354,0.0006247285,0.000052330124,0.0017472351,0.00015641304,0.00040415901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002977093,0.00010868853,0.0002771589,0.001114853,0.0005384848,0.0002400965,0.00014782655,0.00066947466,0.000020893145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001119389,0.00067362323,0.023251776,0.00030710522,0.00033262355,0.000013072136,0.040218927,0.00002496155,0.030467393,0.10429624,0.05399448,0.7453004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016599743,0.00033549557,0.04177846,0.008628746,0.00028311438,0.000017438026,0.0022104136,0.000015414544,0.000991759,0.004704293,0.93898165,0.0003932267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006850536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001196694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017133121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022094732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48049697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115152292","doi":"","title":"Moore v Sweet: Four Lessons in Unjust Enrichment from the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Constructive trust; Element (criminal law); Statute; Constructive; Restitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.07967098125673334,"score_gpt":0.3047506684458837,"score_spread":0.2250796871891504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115152292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029375013,0.017738422,0.000003282482,0.95337266,0.000047825142,0.0006635063,0.00022118907,0.0000055811115,0.025010016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96923316,0.008462845,0.000013298496,0.021827724,0.000129277,0.00003418734,0.000008790947,0.0000060890043,0.00028464192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906003,0.00016692,0.00018801677,0.000118080854,0.00023160172,0.00023537027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992562,0.00011620225,0.00006598978,0.00024784874,0.000042183223,0.00027156944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045931496,0.00006614227,0.00015895939,0.000005907367,0.0003880366,0.000021844804,0.00062354177,0.000023769133,0.0005765553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018705515,0.000041284893,0.000041564927,0.00031455283,0.00009352659,0.00003135268,0.00002882884,0.0001409577,0.000026069456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016374474,0.000011071174,0.002957094,0.00016373057,0.000040015766,0.000012169163,0.0077202404,0.000045358207,0.000009578158,0.5286784,0.45180684,0.00855384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003391435,0.0000023017665,0.00543244,0.00016241062,0.000021878981,1.15929254e-7,0.0005401,0.000017107754,0.0000015460607,0.0003565874,0.99337673,0.00005484638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99784285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96629566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036465935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036430259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64625716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115194936","doi":"10.1093/owc/9780199537983.003.0028","title":"The Judge’s House","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Annuity; History; Economics; Finance; Archaeology; Pension; Life annuity","score_opus":0.04028548418522459,"score_gpt":0.23917482662968426,"score_spread":0.19888934244445966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115194936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020310357,0.00009817587,0.000040447463,0.00035601723,0.00011667146,0.0003280429,0.00004281144,0.00019892772,0.9987986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009142248,0.0047152527,0.00004541137,0.00005887652,0.00021019779,0.0000010552351,0.0000031885074,0.00002682435,0.994025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908894,0.000033306427,0.00009833794,0.00023254313,0.00029722473,0.00024962297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991296,0.000117837226,0.00013435635,0.0003929274,0.00009333742,0.00013197334],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000116678566,0.00014649742,0.00013523042,0.00003207817,0.0023986453,0.00007400923,0.0007571073,0.00024114638,0.000022812226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008754407,0.00013351178,0.00015422096,0.000007076652,0.00071298116,0.00005861027,0.00022361432,0.0003199512,0.000009068331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009381035,0.000003088564,8.78762e-7,0.0000022489785,0.000029111316,0.000014916567,0.001068278,9.5312043e-7,3.9327242e-7,0.97171855,0.021521287,0.005630916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009714883,0.00000773058,0.000004435872,0.000011473084,0.000039166007,8.5025243e-7,0.00015777734,0.0000024311955,0.00000298217,0.0010834163,0.9984255,0.00016708225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093532994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014195372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016280627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002414277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116251863","doi":"","title":"A.R.Buck, The Making ofAustralian Property Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Property law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Property rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042552738064311965,"score_gpt":0.3288249408967122,"score_spread":0.28627220283240024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116251863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024860041,0.00008531884,0.00024141336,0.016617896,0.00025652963,0.00052788295,0.000009511764,0.00017783901,0.9572236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695856,0.000006518202,0.0005849608,0.00423075,0.0007658887,0.00002731731,0.0000025723032,0.000013593424,0.024782792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986037,0.00008446262,0.0002194499,0.00023326304,0.00037406597,0.00048506635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925995,0.00007425524,0.00007571819,0.0003644522,0.000074632655,0.00015099425],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001239602,0.000106610816,0.0001031487,0.000013569293,0.0016600043,0.00026531302,0.0005507639,0.0000980189,0.0006834443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000625044,0.0000630932,0.00008258591,0.00027257373,0.00049170485,0.0002599296,0.000079235986,0.00030124778,0.0007943113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004500924,0.000028190101,0.0006806269,0.0000034924096,0.000007654878,0.0000033268548,0.001091374,0.0000052838996,0.00017957338,0.9925658,0.0037230432,0.0017070931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009415483,0.000011729972,0.0015283132,0.000014999475,0.000009530101,0.0000012251846,0.0014104594,0.0000040864566,0.0002381517,0.0052532866,0.99130833,0.0001257562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026733736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11028064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98758525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010174983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082597486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119284486","doi":"10.5040/9781509934782.ch-008","title":"Revisiting Injurious Falsehood","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.047854208381757135,"score_gpt":0.29293539064318397,"score_spread":0.24508118226142683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119284486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003846392,0.0003939547,0.000054998192,0.0056407237,0.0003342657,0.00029587522,0.000074240044,0.0002870201,0.99288046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011909933,0.0000644523,0.00045854997,0.0013039014,0.0034507918,0.000031112486,0.000104752726,0.00007011291,0.9826064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785006,0.000060665232,0.00041396823,0.0005376262,0.000706814,0.0004308406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998364,0.00016310178,0.00032195746,0.0005428532,0.00035147616,0.0002566208],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010410075,0.00024858303,0.00034828632,0.00011016208,0.0010292573,0.0040876777,0.0007168605,0.00051722606,0.0010580218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046821835,0.00027331657,0.00024179845,0.00003858913,0.00018519774,0.00059031753,0.0003319422,0.0009369375,0.0002076578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.455321e-7,0.000003007611,0.000004381399,0.000019544132,0.000025923076,0.000015216214,0.0012880018,1.9297765e-7,0.000016287471,0.93894106,0.019830018,0.039855637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069530644,0.0000039771444,0.000008138758,0.00023926272,0.000036468547,0.0000021975704,0.00024909532,0.000001309703,0.00001295631,0.024244526,0.9748262,0.00030632346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075373385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081272965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95499617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020391098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078074733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120641221","doi":"","title":"A TROJAN HORSE: CAN INDIAN SELF-GOVERNMENT BE PROMOTED THROUGH THE INDIAN ACT?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Indigenous; Parliament; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Treaty of Waitangi; Law; Government (linguistics); Population; Legislation; Supreme court; Politics; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.025476564129801493,"score_gpt":0.29273182412458415,"score_spread":0.26725525999478267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120641221","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034598958,0.008434896,7.714924e-7,0.76228505,0.00021888182,0.005203209,0.00022431384,0.000079080026,0.18895483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961695,0.00878305,0.000041832056,0.024647098,0.00019148344,0.00013381556,0.000014286373,0.000021153814,0.004472255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821186,0.00031507105,0.00022169555,0.00022752247,0.00049383554,0.0005299961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870044,0.000064496926,0.00012810405,0.00070499745,0.0000435727,0.00035840465],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00098476,0.00014354776,0.00021000186,0.000013465132,0.0013047238,0.0001549803,0.0009785905,0.000076829354,0.0012207248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093979375,0.000085186766,0.000109440814,0.0004868531,0.00016360772,0.000103414364,0.00004967641,0.00030164735,0.000551013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026050493,0.00006646792,0.0017506528,0.00067190605,0.0001883146,0.00002573621,0.12633885,0.0000025412535,0.000010051421,0.7566747,0.07607457,0.038193613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006263959,0.000012852656,0.0010437383,0.00021226401,0.000045305973,0.0000035591063,0.0015485875,0.0000011527261,0.000004128928,0.00047003187,0.996462,0.0001337306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4818176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.910447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92709607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009035952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017554229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121197602","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2841","title":"Anti-Social Behaviour, Expulsion from Condominium, and the Reconstruction of Ownership","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Business; Law; Land tenure; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.026973672686895045,"score_gpt":0.2843780672776272,"score_spread":0.25740439459073217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121197602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80037725,0.00021516066,0.00055825553,0.019793045,0.0004119446,0.00022165116,0.000046109257,0.000022503464,0.17835405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858606,0.00028106512,0.00031883366,0.00006650085,0.00052266335,0.000004529945,6.7138325e-7,0.0000055480973,0.00021412384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990345,0.0002443028,0.00023664629,0.00010475834,0.0002288136,0.00015097835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992538,0.00023778276,0.0002510935,0.0000825795,0.000094360956,0.000080358026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007827096,0.000062061896,0.00015455377,0.000016864062,0.0010902219,0.000082875966,0.00017641064,0.00007787631,0.00025618452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068281384,0.00003210632,0.00008117458,0.0000556736,0.00088587456,0.00022441013,0.000033191056,0.00013664027,0.000007837416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056486737,0.000020281394,0.0038484796,9.345862e-7,0.000016488118,9.3077614e-7,0.002104931,1.1449646e-7,0.002709891,0.97043335,0.00012886393,0.020679241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013025221,0.000079648875,0.045764048,0.00025886938,0.00030423893,0.00012094651,0.015912501,0.000017047196,0.0074674147,0.88041204,0.036130585,0.0005074616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026624842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029239837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1982088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035668472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046210567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.988474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121276650","doi":"","title":"Legal Personality and the Canadian REIT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Real estate investment trust; Duty; Duty of loyalty; Trust law; Business; Personality; Investment (military); Law; Real estate; Economic Justice; Estate; Accounting; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Finance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01818099225505582,"score_gpt":0.3071642247463786,"score_spread":0.2889832324913228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121276650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2380663,0.0011276121,0.0001374417,0.23581658,0.00016170263,0.00021549895,0.0000045432457,0.000014170756,0.52445614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98889947,0.0012245238,0.00001026849,0.0002417417,0.00048179898,0.0000036951815,2.2986816e-7,0.0000034942068,0.009134777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857527,0.00008621893,0.0000755588,0.00008051648,0.00016949003,0.0010129709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952614,0.00002926406,0.00008723739,0.00016007245,0.000050441973,0.00014684298],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033093414,0.000044230328,0.000062519684,0.000014882879,0.008210261,0.00070863345,0.0004401119,0.00003963673,0.00003568648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019076317,0.0000297037,0.00004628569,0.000025751464,0.000570438,0.00021208012,0.000025382848,0.0008362151,0.000014632768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004101663,0.0000020627508,0.0017016152,2.0176965e-7,0.000013689399,3.837327e-7,0.0007684093,2.2779022e-7,7.332352e-7,0.9932913,0.00010065377,0.004116582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003943653,0.000009721642,0.01343901,0.0000023335106,0.000015324089,0.000035621022,0.0029492383,0.000015238547,7.862742e-7,0.40976503,0.5733085,0.000064770604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.803357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75083315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006184386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055317366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121457708","doi":"","title":"The Assumption of Risk Defence in Torts (Common Law) and Extra-Contractual Liability (Québec Civil Law) in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Delict; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal liability; Liability; Tort; Strict liability; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Private law; Economics; Business; Commercial law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.006120081997065048,"score_gpt":0.24026851063416532,"score_spread":0.23414842863710028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121457708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916903,0.0008177285,0.000099227924,0.0015419498,0.000044138164,0.000106028914,0.0000025896595,0.000003196327,0.0056948666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982953,0.0015141839,0.000006319324,0.00006185484,0.00006919271,0.000005816238,3.220264e-7,0.0000037182529,0.000043307376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983361,0.0003067869,0.00026773187,0.000114373914,0.00022094134,0.0007541157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913293,0.00050470064,0.00015211565,0.00011457128,0.0000352662,0.0000603857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003548641,0.00006158858,0.00011494395,0.0000134876145,0.00043393287,0.00003843519,0.00020438523,0.00003919886,0.000008169209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017914448,0.00004747714,0.000026210937,0.00009799683,0.00017051141,0.0001319786,0.000018171899,0.0008196654,6.552388e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001431679,0.000027273443,0.15063141,0.0000016165156,0.000005846236,2.8289216e-7,0.0009820873,0.00007954367,0.00002499646,0.83029604,0.000007523797,0.017929053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006344357,0.000075124895,0.3144621,0.000028761804,0.000019575773,0.000010272939,0.009749353,0.00044912333,0.00005947842,0.626048,0.04824713,0.0002166037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20424803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018591068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004493781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79717743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121512377","doi":"","title":"Keeping It Private: The Impossibility to Abandon Ownership and the horror vacui of the Common Law of Property","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Abandonment (legal); Impossibility; Common law; Law; Doctrine; Private law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Common ownership; Civil law (Civil law); Property law; Normative; Business; Political science; Public law; Economics; Property rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027809995967756698,"score_gpt":0.2915883705095085,"score_spread":0.2637783745417518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121512377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7562019,0.00050408614,0.00024516947,0.2360886,0.00003640601,0.00067699474,0.0000029840357,0.000008669651,0.006235165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997997,0.00029652566,0.000012117973,0.0013417497,0.00012539527,0.000008695241,1.2642107e-7,0.00000488087,0.00021352652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984535,0.0003828788,0.0002528643,0.00010598424,0.00027423777,0.0005305152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993279,0.00015849705,0.00019911578,0.0001877283,0.00006635505,0.000060391703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031851323,0.00006461921,0.00014086868,0.0000062731265,0.00081132376,0.00005275498,0.00064294017,0.00003350496,0.0000073955925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001949303,0.000022906452,0.00009814886,0.0002533145,0.0005159509,0.0000751552,0.000113886665,0.0007425642,0.0000012792318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008923637,0.000019262105,0.0014896832,0.0000062292006,0.000031778716,3.7622808e-8,0.012609659,0.000016151738,0.00075196254,0.9820628,0.000044398716,0.0028788124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029755754,0.0005083871,0.011997632,0.00011011341,0.00024739586,0.000027559672,0.05554548,0.0005429035,0.004352446,0.7428222,0.18048798,0.0003823801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00339493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018107321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24179506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011414255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007238577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121512595","doi":"","title":"Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co. - The Unofficial Death of the Independent Wrong Requirement and Official Birth of Punitive Damages in Contract","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Damages; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02316460974970285,"score_gpt":0.3044423928061502,"score_spread":0.28127778305644735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121512595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895096,0.00065470865,0.00015518139,0.0045536305,0.000040380863,0.00029205947,0.00001389591,0.0000046909076,0.004775879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977834,0.0016266675,0.000007906363,0.00007095833,0.00022996622,0.0000055842643,4.5467596e-7,0.0000063157777,0.00026870368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825513,0.0002525689,0.00032257213,0.00010472105,0.00039240674,0.00067259267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993439,0.00011114243,0.0002951842,0.00011452513,0.00009895324,0.00003634494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022060052,0.00008199351,0.000143826,0.00004551595,0.00043242812,0.000034464523,0.00038296863,0.000041832238,0.000015026423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095119816,0.000050723553,0.000053146054,0.00020153211,0.0002699253,0.0001497833,0.000045809356,0.0007759415,9.932393e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009995457,0.00023226754,0.07434806,0.0000032180035,0.000052316904,3.5818468e-7,0.004947931,0.00024125492,0.0015667097,0.90506256,0.00000863612,0.013436725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020777092,0.0005052382,0.91208625,0.00008889551,0.000051010735,0.000024240617,0.022002058,0.000116778174,0.0021261529,0.04831644,0.012345084,0.0002601734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028808888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07387667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85674614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038184956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018103593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94302267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121667437","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002381","title":"Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Toward a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Duty; Law; Doctrine; Legislation; Freedom of contract; Service (business); Race (biology); Public law; Political science; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025356954900259115,"score_gpt":0.3312106010967158,"score_spread":0.30585364619645666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121667437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95062643,0.0002948662,0.00015990881,0.020350145,0.00030065584,0.0004910333,0.000026354699,0.0000034155692,0.027747178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868715,0.00004896266,0.00016685651,0.0007379862,0.00015943484,0.000008766531,6.027964e-7,0.0000049256896,0.0001853311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889153,0.00013253572,0.000316527,0.000090574154,0.00031131788,0.00025753665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986493,0.00018463706,0.00021627724,0.000121381934,0.0002778106,0.00055059104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009767548,0.00006904757,0.00018099412,0.000046772624,0.00058397563,0.00009729547,0.0003426299,0.000048155023,0.000069960544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000951052,0.000049039674,0.000050431343,0.00017236854,0.0006885521,0.00026081002,0.000021109967,0.0002008672,0.0000036358147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005568044,0.000052759882,0.012167163,0.0000064429514,0.000014886277,0.000024426203,0.037541736,0.000031267722,0.00006796289,0.9482064,0.0004669858,0.0013642837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030651623,0.000469843,0.26284155,0.00039029747,0.00015450298,0.00005455001,0.023993598,0.00015650374,0.00020403518,0.03132006,0.67695415,0.00039572708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3878343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78520536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9168863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109714296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009041607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6162421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121730967","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994","title":"The Worlds of the Trust","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Trust law; Common law; Legislation; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); China; Express trust; Settlor; Private law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.020147539263476018,"score_gpt":0.22681165332096292,"score_spread":0.20666411405748691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121730967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023896855,0.00008334596,0.000016558366,0.00038269136,0.00020507941,0.00055875897,0.000086367545,0.000033972512,0.99839425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003022125,0.00011818369,0.000008431629,0.00003759497,0.00018756688,0.0000022440054,0.000003436458,0.000010755525,0.9966097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906135,0.00012100126,0.000119014905,0.00017572362,0.00030981848,0.0002130919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987979,0.00017088951,0.00023198077,0.0005613434,0.00015815617,0.00007974316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018632578,0.00011766545,0.00014190156,0.00002286294,0.001378743,0.00006886117,0.001393668,0.00017495244,0.000005314464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024822284,0.00008116977,0.00018945498,0.000025492986,0.0011441814,0.00004720408,0.00039378728,0.00032265115,0.00001389513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026775713,0.000003171918,0.0000033282452,0.000006628181,0.000020888087,5.2036927e-7,0.0002661351,4.4648877e-7,0.0000032681403,0.77396935,0.2250818,0.00064174697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007740172,0.0000027980795,0.000100627556,0.000029442823,0.00005882362,1.6789824e-7,0.00028404436,0.0000064529054,0.000031618387,0.000054907723,0.9992551,0.00009858554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034313067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022292622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7741733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022256061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006385391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121805234","doi":"","title":"Peoples, BCE, and the Good Corporate \"Citizen\"","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Expansive; Corporation; Deference; Law; Discretion; Statutory law; Legislature; Shareholder; Corporate law; Political science; Corporate title; Corporate governance; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02470828335850687,"score_gpt":0.27540565853192944,"score_spread":0.25069737517342255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121805234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007796063,0.0004798701,0.00039169693,0.03108171,0.000099788755,0.00015705707,0.0000053690414,0.000034715977,0.9599537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946989,0.0008605038,0.00051569403,0.0013841051,0.0005057615,0.0000037608943,0.0000010636074,0.000005377267,0.0020248361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990031,0.00016496185,0.00018794945,0.00011417397,0.00027510463,0.00025470866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992872,0.00012653985,0.00019733065,0.00012793923,0.000081679864,0.0001793262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009678583,0.00008059959,0.00012592162,0.000015517528,0.0021891822,0.00042295683,0.00028167025,0.000054501277,0.00011460015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005536202,0.000052675194,0.00006878732,0.00012738549,0.000381436,0.00018986646,0.00002703044,0.00028025697,0.000036630096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001302468,0.000020940784,0.00011744995,7.744089e-7,0.000007272953,0.0000032297708,0.0011969921,0.0000047722206,0.000033987057,0.99550146,0.0008030777,0.0022970473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010301378,0.00003351307,0.0027704565,0.000017758115,0.000028013274,0.00005869171,0.0014965885,0.000036918882,0.000029785942,0.8362703,0.15809493,0.00013292955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01015943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08082452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98690283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003273136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010308364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121915089","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01204.x","title":"An Empirical Examination of the Governance Choices of Income Trusts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Jurisdiction; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13504073181063656,"score_gpt":0.4267307255811078,"score_spread":0.2916899937704712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121915089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97947484,0.00084111776,0.000049942584,0.0028643846,0.0002367366,0.000109221386,0.00000778329,0.0000061495193,0.016409794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984764,0.00035341622,0.000519918,0.00012543719,0.00024862518,0.0000028297543,7.918499e-8,0.00000508636,0.00026819724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998241,0.0002791096,0.00058712123,0.000102746926,0.0006350688,0.00015497446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980743,0.00025987744,0.0008560711,0.00016259328,0.00056544505,0.000081713886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010439705,0.00008794733,0.00031885222,0.000035070596,0.00025144135,0.000015381649,0.00054352486,0.000065941844,0.00003829144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007592888,0.000052457413,0.0001682493,0.00041441908,0.00061208126,0.00041663216,0.000092188755,0.00020968291,0.0000016010043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015163387,0.0016144507,0.7800795,0.000100764606,0.00039661615,0.000008978718,0.10529108,0.000043279317,0.000989938,0.093902834,0.0032730089,0.014147937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021379165,0.00022960496,0.94524676,0.000056977147,0.00005219652,0.0000024430126,0.0033576442,0.000011541998,0.0009962433,0.0016624999,0.04809634,0.00007393041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043632207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006600583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16516732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009889839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016013987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22552389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121924561","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.3.275","title":"EXCLUSION AND EXCLUSIVITY IN PROPERTY LAW","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bundle of rights; Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Setter; Position (finance); Property law; Business; Tangible property; Law; Boundary (topology); Real property; Political science; Sociology; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.023045131689279037,"score_gpt":0.2465368943110173,"score_spread":0.22349176262173825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121924561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31327897,0.00024706093,0.00012709109,0.0015850159,0.000043870547,0.00009839998,0.0000031834584,0.000011337517,0.68460506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706227,0.0007981037,0.00044441383,0.000051021474,0.000047176083,2.7064466e-8,2.381886e-7,0.0000015710339,0.0015951922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995344,0.00006958297,0.00006242159,0.00007148166,0.00015235835,0.000109753564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997188,0.00001853582,0.000055647568,0.00005480061,0.0000558327,0.000096424315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023794344,0.000035215573,0.000077998106,0.000006933059,0.0014474259,0.000011305299,0.00014436345,0.000041192667,0.00030342108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000074026257,0.000030469157,0.000029596675,0.000023057064,0.00039997164,0.00046078395,0.00006421795,0.00008522046,0.0000023308742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072814866,0.00024104815,0.007508669,0.000009740302,0.000015351992,0.00010034831,0.058698133,0.000020318843,0.00078104803,0.92453426,0.0012746465,0.006743609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053347263,0.00004183078,0.01325945,0.000021242491,0.0000069070497,0.000023010743,0.007266921,0.00003153187,0.000029971834,0.0009852322,0.9777099,0.000090568916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4795797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7218105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019636037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006219808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121975556","doi":"10.1002/iir.150","title":"Insolvency law: a comparative analysis of the preference tests in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) and Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Preference; Legislation; Test (biology); Debtor; Law; Relation (database); Political science; Economics; Creditor; Finance; Debt; Computer science","score_opus":0.3138805512943926,"score_gpt":0.47254475796415063,"score_spread":0.15866420666975806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121975556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5972046,0.007517887,0.00031184076,0.016298862,0.00054294505,0.002405399,0.00014368104,0.000026582604,0.37554818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954177,0.0034335875,0.000075996126,0.00044453458,0.00020366741,0.000035100595,0.000011810177,0.0000021155713,0.0003754848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985171,0.00020826812,0.00046362123,0.00020293602,0.00045184288,0.0001562532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989431,0.00031506593,0.00030802502,0.0002106224,0.00018105112,0.00004217197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010052245,0.00010196635,0.0002471553,0.0000683645,0.00020154516,0.000049140035,0.0006690552,0.00004762793,0.000117665746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017474883,0.000064671345,0.00014339811,0.0010495863,0.0003962986,0.0001985857,0.00006411639,0.00020251107,0.0000062660997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008472429,0.0001628682,0.03802957,0.000045242024,0.000117911484,0.0000036149315,0.008751128,0.000004096919,0.000019082103,0.9504799,0.000902984,0.0014750763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015524859,0.000036865527,0.6842369,0.00090642174,0.00027688706,0.0000034643579,0.0017782038,0.000021890955,0.000051888688,0.005013211,0.30734935,0.00016967529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022814374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04768616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94546676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007902293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008531687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9696911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122021911","doi":"10.3138/utlj.0215","title":"A theory of redressive justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Undoing; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Enforcement; Tort; Political science; Law; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.015587830290980638,"score_gpt":0.25685699440608467,"score_spread":0.24126916411510405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122021911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019382516,0.0001422105,0.0072972164,0.0005890049,0.00008847466,0.000045251076,0.000005824024,0.0000081819635,0.9724413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968604,0.00014885156,0.001283282,0.000026855752,0.000101686266,1.1722325e-8,2.2889174e-7,0.0000014155266,0.0015772796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995334,0.00013229343,0.00006294335,0.000044737822,0.0001452595,0.00008137456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947596,0.00009179294,0.00014667565,0.000071472205,0.00013943591,0.00007468847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004713764,0.000026313259,0.000072935705,0.00000578271,0.000589562,0.0000081091775,0.00024196133,0.00003228128,0.0008120735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048548132,0.000027486003,0.000055481938,0.000016980177,0.0002735948,0.0002042346,0.000031434894,0.00005576981,0.000003715913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019099863,0.000023960174,0.00004346731,0.000004093774,0.000011868832,7.662152e-7,0.008105277,0.000010481839,0.00013750225,0.9882867,0.0005224326,0.0028343978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041269558,0.00006012491,0.0018101494,0.000033839937,0.00011661613,0.0000025065651,0.055033293,0.000033133205,0.000105520936,0.017825786,0.92448884,0.00007752052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033774577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055178933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97747785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007639043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005138369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9726596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122022813","doi":"","title":"Contracts: Force Majeure Concept or Force Majeure Clauses ?","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Business; Public law","score_opus":0.01792010847398209,"score_gpt":0.31819242613888005,"score_spread":0.300272317664898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122022813","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22790685,0.2318548,0.18454292,0.17431417,0.00734235,0.0030407577,0.00021369667,0.00048351855,0.17030093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71394813,0.015650885,0.00020953937,0.001236551,0.0033558924,0.000007663103,0.0000071289055,0.000047994297,0.26553625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923838,0.00023025664,0.0007775491,0.0004320151,0.0007378319,0.0054385546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978636,0.00045061993,0.0005569888,0.00031178887,0.0003064776,0.0005105533],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040860083,0.0003710121,0.00040795622,0.00009669194,0.0016591271,0.00028072653,0.0008933262,0.0004465222,0.00086828106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027478364,0.00031824104,0.00032278098,0.0007800806,0.00064030767,0.00078851735,0.00008011291,0.0038607265,0.0002796502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012350142,0.00016189078,0.00038535823,0.000011144051,0.00018840982,0.000030990443,0.0022571592,0.00005183351,0.00023283428,0.94379646,0.0025440736,0.050216332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011548181,0.00047646114,0.00039506334,0.00008841291,0.00017618472,0.0006445846,0.022676839,0.000057004658,0.00020208383,0.21147807,0.7621762,0.000474252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012116741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03766949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7596322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002212157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005278807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122061486","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1273","title":"Weather, Leather, and the Obligation to Disclose: Kerr v. Danier Leather Inc.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Prospectus; Obligation; Law; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Supreme court; Statutory law; Issuer; Statute; Political science; Business; History; Finance","score_opus":0.010621077471350129,"score_gpt":0.2713514578852011,"score_spread":0.260730380413851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122061486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025015559,0.0006387917,0.0019262098,0.03268062,0.00016263069,0.00037822226,0.000010128935,0.000047110803,0.93914074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884255,0.00016268334,0.0006765009,0.0007046582,0.0009344444,0.000023175457,0.000002294991,0.000017226566,0.009053494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987676,0.000185002,0.00023581318,0.00016489119,0.00035738674,0.00028928253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993824,0.00009556951,0.00011483213,0.00017141014,0.000090111775,0.00014569974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009908581,0.000110814035,0.00013418027,0.0000266319,0.0019661447,0.00045244122,0.00030130125,0.00007241965,0.000213522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032078187,0.00007150155,0.0000708227,0.00015731688,0.0003600737,0.0002497526,0.00006165091,0.00027596962,0.00009654697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016941769,0.000040399365,0.00033595573,0.0000011827764,0.000010939326,0.0000017206407,0.001987016,0.00004359917,0.00024579564,0.9928897,0.001946216,0.002480523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007976059,0.00002311103,0.0016734053,0.000019974854,0.000031075117,0.000021240383,0.0013770638,0.00006700124,0.000075262884,0.3328337,0.66291827,0.0001622993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07450843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17522478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96340996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007440349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056957408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122182973","doi":"10.7202/1018988ar","title":"Contract’s Meaning and the Histories of Classical Contract Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Individualism; Law; Social contract; Vision; Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.023678146374099533,"score_gpt":0.2768374858055749,"score_spread":0.25315933943147534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122182973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00829422,0.0001945054,0.000048288464,0.031256933,0.00020583067,0.0002163641,0.000009601052,0.000018063836,0.9597562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998637,0.0000566048,0.00017483789,0.0005434541,0.0002056611,0.000008861629,2.2029138e-7,0.0000047819003,0.00036857763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991707,0.00013362916,0.000217946,0.00007125291,0.00023274163,0.00017373438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916834,0.00032297874,0.00016050586,0.00007910061,0.00015106563,0.00011801465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064705196,0.000056462846,0.00014617426,0.000007895818,0.0032811402,0.00012195464,0.00016626844,0.00004854395,0.00022152207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000955503,0.000034679244,0.00006278722,0.000043999957,0.0010002023,0.00029716938,0.000026293552,0.00023993061,0.000008775348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009022902,0.000016739868,0.000048165588,0.000001105025,0.0000133717695,7.7250957e-7,0.0011072113,0.0000011983059,0.00006852115,0.9970854,0.00017322857,0.0014752803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052908016,0.000012737375,0.00030081533,0.0000064191927,0.000018665105,0.00001131855,0.000746641,0.000049769264,0.00008447346,0.03285235,0.965335,0.00005269996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018245861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027499836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005415936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000135979635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122184023","doi":"","title":"LEGAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGES","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Commonwealth; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Subject (documents); Sociology","score_opus":0.07027222147544328,"score_gpt":0.3288787539213947,"score_spread":0.25860653244595144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122184023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038241085,0.04961466,0.000041727206,0.1809408,0.00009058799,0.0012183789,0.000045713026,0.00002375566,0.76420027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783736,0.014683084,0.000046198234,0.0026512654,0.0000625593,0.000056945173,0.000004964791,0.000006987518,0.004114412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990497,0.0003223395,0.00017875223,0.00008833382,0.00018351787,0.00017735297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992687,0.00010403885,0.000111082314,0.00034343178,0.000060421116,0.00011232735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017081753,0.000052493127,0.00009958069,0.000009857351,0.00087678444,0.000045111046,0.00039326242,0.000023750623,0.00040844665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005856356,0.000029928817,0.00005786032,0.0002461032,0.00021868058,0.000058515627,0.000010650019,0.00009433006,0.00014486905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.942533e-8,0.000002215157,0.0002587611,0.00003762745,0.000003937364,1.0115336e-7,0.0005260125,0.0000024518386,0.0000023973673,0.99410343,0.0029338975,0.0021291068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001419262,0.0000017596772,0.0011533274,0.0000946715,0.00002289307,8.426442e-7,0.0003231736,0.000002542578,0.0000069140115,0.0005035215,0.9978329,0.00004327264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18834667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6388166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014716161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007563665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8170582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122184729","doi":"","title":"The Genealogy of Legal Positivism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Legal positivism; Morality; Politics; Space (punctuation); Epistemology; Legal formalism; Law; Style (visual arts); Legal realism; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; History; Legal profession; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.00793565863669261,"score_gpt":0.2860704364173628,"score_spread":0.2781347777806702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122184729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7860702,0.0055143186,0.024401518,0.07970075,0.00040126042,0.00033765766,0.0000041908806,0.000050498682,0.1035196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943488,0.0033959239,0.000048210662,0.000066060275,0.00029966544,0.000002842981,2.9597697e-7,0.0000047686767,0.0018333955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985563,0.000061419,0.00014100873,0.00006176553,0.00019272594,0.0009867742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965954,0.0000439719,0.00009416685,0.000084533895,0.00006925924,0.00004852663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013615628,0.000042047905,0.000058892303,0.000017809534,0.0009986013,0.00005193597,0.00028956705,0.000033272823,0.0000058503106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040390776,0.000029204755,0.00006519745,0.00012576293,0.00017802199,0.00009368487,0.000017916196,0.00056414574,0.000014053558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004084753,0.000016444408,0.000058564463,2.0757848e-7,0.000018756386,3.5663302e-7,0.0004481004,0.000032276796,0.0002615053,0.9920645,0.000015867368,0.007079333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024274422,0.00007595805,0.0005352916,0.0000031375723,0.000011426629,0.00004676499,0.003690294,0.0000020952052,0.0002095094,0.8460621,0.14906482,0.00005582421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027589828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02303903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20827864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000471227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035719927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99478793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122214964","doi":"","title":"The Immunity of the Attorney General to Law Society Discipline","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Statutory law; Good faith; Discretion; Legislature","score_opus":0.0215225436389435,"score_gpt":0.2997566813757308,"score_spread":0.2782341377367873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122214964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7317929,0.000195611,0.0002877175,0.10005406,0.0005358584,0.00072549976,0.00011196114,0.000089327536,0.16620706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98146874,0.00006675273,0.0003198304,0.0012924537,0.00045883874,0.000045609097,9.853593e-7,0.00000904913,0.01633775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998892,0.00014878741,0.00019660665,0.00015450739,0.00031886034,0.00028925686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889106,0.00018869931,0.00008503705,0.00058603584,0.00009999749,0.00014918766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000751489,0.00008225598,0.00009727815,0.0000026553853,0.002161475,0.000096654454,0.0008612086,0.000060665116,0.0001308386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101513375,0.00003755047,0.00016816595,0.00021399448,0.00071581017,0.00014838573,0.00032937134,0.00013833167,0.00013535298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035654632,0.00002380341,0.0008804774,0.0000015681896,0.000011495745,3.448869e-8,0.0007908951,0.000004690085,0.0040258747,0.9876243,0.0060786884,0.0005546236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013382295,0.000010025804,0.0069356444,0.000015900347,0.000008264246,1.1765212e-7,0.0005008914,0.000004165314,0.0019871164,0.011608155,0.97871166,0.00008425625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014063122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043259893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094905576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012016341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122249877","doi":"","title":"A Public Role for the Intentional Torts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Judicial opinion; Private law; Public law; Law and economics; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02199882557528531,"score_gpt":0.29986066490759317,"score_spread":0.27786183933230785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122249877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36192262,0.004031981,0.11632633,0.40112424,0.0031563353,0.0018422921,0.000026546064,0.0002063409,0.111363314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922038,0.00043296543,0.00010694694,0.00015237778,0.0012388687,0.00004021274,0.0000014537042,0.000006132345,0.005817253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855995,0.000025204925,0.00010815621,0.00008063681,0.00019408035,0.0010319717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950975,0.000107847234,0.00006847734,0.000093356386,0.00014981962,0.00007076099],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022035646,0.00004493528,0.00004394356,0.000022972752,0.0014640448,0.00018073233,0.00037013373,0.0000448334,0.00013527303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021200834,0.000030292429,0.00009967897,0.00010657923,0.00010981824,0.0001660237,0.000020895139,0.0009626011,0.00002095906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002439939,0.00001951329,0.00037253345,1.7810629e-7,0.000020635838,2.7182724e-8,0.00022156976,6.1843446e-7,0.00023549971,0.96953964,0.00027682542,0.029310493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008168396,0.00001367334,0.00039982554,4.6199474e-7,0.00000726068,0.0000121640305,0.002424345,0.000043424687,0.0000053119643,0.44243303,0.5545451,0.000033681707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003460131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037746627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6302812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017624254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024256124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122274319","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.579","title":"GIVING VOICE TO REALITY: MICHAEL TREBILCOCK AND PENSION GOVERNANCE ISSUES","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Moral hazard; Pension; Liability; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; Commission; Business; Private pension; Economics; Actuarial science; Law; Finance; Sociology; Political science; Incentive; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.014998732713589107,"score_gpt":0.2777613802792982,"score_spread":0.2627626475657091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122274319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71908724,0.00041543558,0.00042048265,0.027460953,0.0002929936,0.00016924959,0.000027094486,0.000030942305,0.2520956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99174106,0.00054444605,0.0029691067,0.000081035025,0.00018705356,2.9223237e-8,2.7402814e-7,0.0000026165278,0.0044743945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994894,0.00003814988,0.000067314955,0.000097301025,0.00018215798,0.00012564947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995005,0.000035187153,0.00009054695,0.00009525902,0.000105378575,0.00017310973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030772088,0.000043869462,0.00008546342,0.00000507683,0.0009670455,0.000040613126,0.00021150072,0.00004791861,0.00041165182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000390325,0.000047629397,0.000035548695,0.000023953284,0.00015188353,0.00039427448,0.000078135316,0.00012308192,0.0000078910925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049053757,0.000085788524,0.0026628952,0.000011150033,0.000025570609,0.000013218261,0.039239734,0.0000090200765,0.010353945,0.9194992,0.011001898,0.017048504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012821412,0.000020202744,0.016008753,0.000014532813,0.000009613304,0.000004306902,0.0059453608,0.000015243656,0.000053850243,0.00051290705,0.9772239,0.00006314234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37742424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80637306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008899022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041814827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.743783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122347404","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4372","title":"OPPORTUNITY LOST: THE SUPREME COURT MISSES A HISTORIC CHANCE TO CONSIDER QUESTION OF PUBLIC INTEREST STANDING FOR ANIMAL INTERESTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Humanities; Intervention (counseling); Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.2804840550246441,"score_gpt":0.4300931352395599,"score_spread":0.1496090802149158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122347404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426143,0.00030491478,0.008009568,0.028755175,0.0006577998,0.0017101087,0.00010892541,0.0000580032,0.017781198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762124,0.000016983622,0.0006637032,0.00042842055,0.0004439263,0.000065099885,0.0000025932636,0.000013127433,0.0007448923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888086,0.00010289096,0.0002855709,0.00015979657,0.00024697013,0.00032392683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984774,0.00041126882,0.00019814158,0.00023827836,0.00037898298,0.0002959366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00113455,0.0000974971,0.0001740928,0.000097153534,0.0002268685,0.00008783407,0.00058044586,0.00005906259,0.00018053813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016746864,0.00008245968,0.00005415079,0.00029455245,0.00015258866,0.00053184293,0.00017847885,0.00009555806,0.00001744339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036211556,0.0007260132,0.022296004,0.00065500813,0.00011502035,0.0000012578419,0.031552583,0.000026911997,0.018580122,0.86625046,0.054813195,0.0046213297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046940023,0.00034363818,0.04772454,0.00037164427,0.00029357956,0.00000231319,0.010422065,0.00009472006,0.008090289,0.0010642689,0.9306487,0.0004748698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006943753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014824071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8758355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017332325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023001934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3362608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122377272","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1191","title":"Will Negligence Law Poison the Well of Foreign Aid? A Case Comment on: Binod Sutradhar v. Natural Environment Research Council","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Personal injury; Action (physics); Liberian dollar; Law; Natural (archaeology); Relation (database); Common law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; History","score_opus":0.04863034106752313,"score_gpt":0.3402469417336626,"score_spread":0.2916166006661395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122377272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10536529,0.013143795,0.00040250455,0.037742514,0.0003660795,0.0017690898,0.00045048073,0.00010216637,0.84065807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977324,0.00057387823,0.00035870256,0.0006056344,0.00023395776,0.000055938635,0.000005458365,0.000005672273,0.00042833405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974298,0.0001978254,0.00026233666,0.00030141574,0.001350482,0.00045816432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990302,0.00021872872,0.0001138591,0.00035993624,0.00019389867,0.00008340508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011835892,0.00012739589,0.00014312028,0.00001192465,0.0012716447,0.000079712365,0.00049282715,0.000054876826,0.000062347506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004443547,0.00009077792,0.000081170045,0.00031445347,0.0011588773,0.00024154832,0.00010289729,0.00020882563,0.00007146258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029261755,0.00016872778,0.00038587704,0.000009654435,0.0000071436416,0.000035089794,0.00038792705,0.00047517015,0.000015879445,0.99004525,0.006583842,0.0018561955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017016986,0.00006998488,0.00016609294,0.000015544543,0.000008782072,0.000010463124,0.0029307983,0.00004957304,0.00017922625,0.0429203,0.9533698,0.00010925561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04050614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023801794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94712496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010137347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020280565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122432221","doi":"10.54648/erpl2016062","title":"The Duties of Trustees in Comparative Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Perspective (graphical); Private law; Civil code; Common law; Public law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.033551555355479344,"score_gpt":0.33410100477760396,"score_spread":0.30054944942212464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122432221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04895749,0.03995822,0.00094000745,0.023631342,0.0003986167,0.002625952,0.0001233152,0.00026196815,0.8831031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9056597,0.08764224,0.0016912548,0.0006326425,0.0003591911,0.000049660404,0.000007828247,0.00010329399,0.003854246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922883,0.0035437793,0.0017753446,0.00079850765,0.000655092,0.0009390087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948711,0.0014405752,0.0012487536,0.0015183882,0.0006372925,0.00028393787],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004777803,0.0004663881,0.0010135955,0.00014517373,0.0005606619,0.00008026273,0.0026034056,0.00009881607,0.00021864512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00268067,0.00032944468,0.00043138218,0.0010599105,0.0018582308,0.0004432194,0.00078822597,0.00058474723,0.000256031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004301307,0.00019133984,0.00088342355,0.0006264529,0.00007979091,0.000025167557,0.004512285,0.000005506093,0.002911539,0.98332345,0.0006949675,0.006703089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007648237,0.00016070335,0.008111607,0.0057906588,0.00009931763,0.000013911933,0.0011779165,0.000008402093,0.0025368005,0.004944382,0.97588307,0.0005083854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025996356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028601705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011253584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027163848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122467187","doi":"","title":"Consideration Which Happens to Fail","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Expansive; Unjust enrichment; Context (archaeology); Law; Database transaction; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.024467127772543222,"score_gpt":0.33266772386737253,"score_spread":0.3082005960948293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122467187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053760428,0.0000011067951,0.023324572,0.05180223,0.0000514405,0.00014504856,7.999712e-7,0.000079959995,0.8708344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863895,0.0000013460434,0.0013455437,0.0017427228,0.00015291976,0.000013485463,0.0000011443148,0.0000021969809,0.010351128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996105,0.0000330127,0.000060459348,0.00008805513,0.00010444046,0.00010356718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996846,0.000054275875,0.000011361671,0.00008891813,0.0000766059,0.00008424617],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026201727,0.000025533964,0.000034962635,0.000012546756,0.00035225734,0.000091208916,0.00006939871,0.000024291867,0.0005477864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001976984,0.000022829707,0.000010443727,0.00013470072,0.00002112232,0.00006841665,0.000017414193,0.000024653567,0.0010779095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.8696346e-7,0.0000032218516,0.00030175527,2.905231e-7,6.47171e-7,1.3645863e-8,0.002177204,0.00001833128,0.0002124353,0.9857953,0.01036546,0.0011250469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033259337,0.000006965492,0.0011577057,9.655027e-7,0.0000012962688,5.6492024e-8,0.0011052922,0.00014380689,0.00024668573,0.005961706,0.99129635,0.000045896788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025262139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03689498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016227652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004629185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122511176","doi":"10.1017/s0731126500006065","title":"Supreme Courts as Courts of General Original Jurisdiction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Certiorari; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Court of record","score_opus":0.025822554780004375,"score_gpt":0.3240781227313847,"score_spread":0.2982555679513803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122511176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75551385,0.000029602552,0.0076198657,0.0023574529,0.0017910677,0.0001407784,0.00002757639,0.000023394381,0.23249643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682724,0.0001197048,0.0018031722,0.00022633794,0.00056618155,0.000002709451,0.000011683072,0.0000036085248,0.00043934784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983269,0.000041412895,0.00063278014,0.00004349452,0.00083626976,0.00011916109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792504,0.000027270447,0.0007668757,0.000070156144,0.0011173419,0.00009331083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062296,0.00006955108,0.00011231675,0.0002203816,0.00010894503,0.00010221609,0.00040097078,0.00006362476,0.0004808892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090641865,0.00006421435,0.0001074131,0.00007491648,0.00010141523,0.0033146397,0.000028741862,0.00015438123,0.000070827366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020842973,0.00014479374,0.0019000769,0.0000061462442,0.00012253568,0.000008479356,0.01762147,0.00025157834,0.0005094957,0.9610871,0.0057802475,0.012359612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058191334,0.00013514464,0.0070989886,0.00004170996,0.000024396712,0.00007753432,0.0012946062,0.00039105513,0.004285292,0.008525093,0.9774282,0.000116075615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031190754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000072705385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016475057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040766477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122538769","doi":"","title":"Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Appeal; Creditor; Business; Credit history; Debt; Tribunal; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05373279725040031,"score_gpt":0.3740905111768526,"score_spread":0.3203577139264523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122538769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8709613,0.000057660633,0.00011768739,0.09112751,0.00031487682,0.00041461634,0.000028209646,0.000015283167,0.036962867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913843,0.000017559501,0.00010932088,0.0018741937,0.0060490463,0.000005329323,0.00000462384,0.0000050414665,0.000550536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987558,0.0000986697,0.00044713766,0.00010280415,0.00029162873,0.00030391963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992333,0.00007001195,0.00032427118,0.00007727425,0.0001533504,0.00014181613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012028044,0.00008737631,0.00022986355,0.000047410012,0.0009244745,0.00016332735,0.00021312843,0.000115826064,0.000019828773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084164836,0.00006448788,0.0001336233,0.00011209699,0.00028027216,0.00030732495,0.000016563768,0.0003020901,7.39839e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015808975,0.00019303478,0.000985838,0.0000026304322,0.000029689007,0.000017136625,0.046209205,0.00000508445,0.00015352559,0.94335973,0.0063597453,0.0025263038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009680556,0.00020789604,0.023254223,0.0000064270416,0.00003842146,0.000040451854,0.0027063445,0.0000073525375,0.00002054555,0.03957583,0.93305653,0.00011790778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2158239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2825515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020177933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011794419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.789398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122598104","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3139","title":"From Baby-selling to Boilerplate: Reflections on the Limits of the Infrastructures of the Market","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Boilerplate text; Law and economics; Law; Commercialization; Economics; Polity; Sociology; Business; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.06596457273450847,"score_gpt":0.36222374621063724,"score_spread":0.2962591734761288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122598104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11098318,0.000028169685,0.00013796725,0.028398046,0.00059290713,0.00021090117,0.000048037953,0.000006702519,0.8595941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978735,0.00004415699,0.00031339403,0.00040365805,0.00045929602,0.0000047825274,1.4690468e-7,0.0000066717753,0.0008943925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989605,0.00018956677,0.00021137924,0.00009685877,0.0003812631,0.0001604188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986729,0.00021249699,0.00038643598,0.0005519739,0.00010912737,0.000067041925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005783729,0.00007122532,0.00009836249,0.00001122283,0.0044426615,0.00020591199,0.0013249203,0.000059489532,0.00034076706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028975957,0.000033312237,0.00013696299,0.00009540075,0.00034831747,0.000096804455,0.00011494345,0.00036740053,0.000005339208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016250297,0.000028439543,0.0010738033,0.0000015401611,0.00003572889,2.3571035e-7,0.004030617,0.0003977345,0.0034929789,0.9854161,0.004623353,0.0008831839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029437937,0.00004706777,0.12701611,0.00026826048,0.00008808125,0.00000719124,0.0034621193,0.00008585588,0.016344653,0.5874429,0.26475003,0.00019337592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037801236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1433627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040462437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009705767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122670959","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198852940.001.0001","title":"Torts and Other Wrongs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Equivocation; Damages; Economic Justice; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.02739378188985002,"score_gpt":0.3104333121458793,"score_spread":0.2830395302560293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122670959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030056193,0.000111960355,0.000022003738,0.0008269311,0.000075574906,0.00020283638,0.000011050284,0.000040159845,0.9986794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00077249913,0.00005677899,0.00007656172,0.00067943154,0.00034833618,0.000006144847,0.0000029394528,0.000009830923,0.9980475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957246,0.000008274363,0.000062143605,0.00013505043,0.0001238826,0.00009819191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974287,0.000033307813,0.000035457928,0.00011933676,0.000016577018,0.00005247909],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010360711,0.00005760882,0.000081387196,0.000013072994,0.00012167443,0.000055644,0.00010002158,0.00013611464,0.0019776104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000051532966,0.00004886295,0.000026925096,0.000014814394,0.00009771886,0.00003256943,0.000036695175,0.00007614729,0.00060558406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.6948212e-7,0.0000021173757,0.00004903938,0.00000372483,0.0000036002807,1.0731036e-7,0.00050229375,3.4697802e-8,3.9275244e-7,0.84217304,0.15601765,0.0012478156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002100792,0.0000028327272,0.000027608716,0.000007286834,0.0000058070723,9.5160686e-8,0.000079920035,7.3067787e-7,3.7525038e-7,0.0097678155,0.9900119,0.00007465642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014466938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020462023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8339942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000500839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024160747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122809876","doi":"","title":"Seduction of a Law Professor","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Task (project management); Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Management; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015278536752930873,"score_gpt":0.30731929155985205,"score_spread":0.29204075480692115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122809876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8399896,0.00055249204,0.0020473043,0.023400346,0.00023257773,0.00043966857,0.0000011641004,0.00004266197,0.13329417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992336,0.00044608675,0.000079209065,0.00005976049,0.00029586678,0.000013638014,4.0094105e-7,0.0000044605686,0.006764599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884,0.000060849583,0.00012877863,0.000059814367,0.00016452494,0.00074603624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996603,0.000016338285,0.00009642041,0.00006501739,0.00011336289,0.000048523663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007632485,0.00003686181,0.00005966109,0.000021340931,0.00039154058,0.000034830588,0.00015376811,0.00003738181,0.00013863554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022115648,0.000031384156,0.0000457212,0.000102832055,0.000101592086,0.00024120192,0.000011358496,0.00047432858,0.0000735384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013179089,0.000026243752,0.00009273065,9.4952406e-7,0.000012091458,2.1098812e-8,0.00092333363,0.0000014481749,0.0005855171,0.9936238,0.00011594767,0.0046166326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014018212,0.00004991227,0.00030272538,0.0000054876973,0.000009776086,0.0000097392085,0.009550061,0.000008249765,0.00020889248,0.89895403,0.090698525,0.00006243202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005734412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006527387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15234636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026490688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012828173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86687535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122813947","doi":"","title":"Legal Epistemology in the Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Restitution; Doctrine; Law; Private law; Legal realism; Political science; Common law; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03857855128584417,"score_gpt":0.3206666080344395,"score_spread":0.2820880567485954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122813947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10185988,0.027117485,0.00015992833,0.035995122,0.00013447921,0.001616065,0.000018037032,0.0000292666,0.83306974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97740376,0.021545531,0.000073799594,0.00050596066,0.000018467035,0.0000014756761,0.0000029041928,9.460842e-7,0.00044715469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993225,0.0002724752,0.00009911327,0.000070707036,0.00011518288,0.000120042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970365,0.00005184322,0.00006611914,0.0001141101,0.000023858527,0.00004044005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093554734,0.000036958143,0.00009630289,0.000014587953,0.00022058752,0.0000055075157,0.0001376569,0.000024883064,0.00001926284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019969,0.00002955782,0.000024693907,0.00016823217,0.00024013524,0.0001940271,0.00004200146,0.000058662838,0.000008900557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018042471,0.000038070517,0.0006593421,0.00009846618,0.0000018912812,0.000001317343,0.00076299533,2.7253876e-7,0.000005074037,0.9974078,0.00048945076,0.0005335513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006872342,0.000010866724,0.0037143405,0.0001278826,0.000023300363,0.0000012093941,0.0006811273,2.9967362e-7,0.0000025910504,0.0001786293,0.995157,0.0000340456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011126896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034037502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99722916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007948853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045251418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99545807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122871717","doi":"","title":"Des exceptions opposables par la caution au créancier","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.08795292485305023,"score_gpt":0.32726795885816107,"score_spread":0.23931503400511084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122871717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11663417,0.00086484116,0.01856319,0.17871478,0.00027195713,0.00027164276,0.00006888992,0.00015630743,0.6844542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95447147,0.0006513316,0.0025999171,0.0014083991,0.0009113287,0.0000301865,0.000009368688,0.000010253725,0.039907735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891865,0.0001470706,0.00017936577,0.00023256538,0.00018171007,0.0003406306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993353,0.00009231419,0.000048619397,0.00011469747,0.00007240725,0.0003366867],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002353481,0.00010497914,0.00010946755,0.000012378121,0.0010289731,0.00011858674,0.00019912764,0.00012893316,0.0036352382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008707655,0.000102447266,0.000095428404,0.00051698094,0.0010107908,0.00035598542,0.0000700422,0.00013870146,0.0019391553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018912681,0.00008558363,0.0026464816,0.000025815167,0.000015249148,0.0000015151179,0.01716642,0.000089168454,0.0004557645,0.93942785,0.021812128,0.018272122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009195566,0.0000242195,0.0100867115,0.000015048742,0.00003483306,0.0000010574807,0.0037238114,0.00075758365,0.00012280092,0.010933748,0.9740643,0.00014391317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009164126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043686237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015207745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040109773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122948277","doi":"","title":"The Public Fiduciary: Emerging Themes in Canadian Fiduciary Law for Pension Trustees","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Pension; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Law; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Supreme court; Political science; Economics; Finance; Duty","score_opus":0.023409224534907614,"score_gpt":0.28803840945673154,"score_spread":0.2646291849218239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122948277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29632145,0.0015998818,0.000025031097,0.21800482,0.0009255018,0.003009652,0.00006240279,0.0001959667,0.4798553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924656,0.000084036,0.0002464333,0.0022827967,0.00041678295,0.00041604,0.000015091883,0.000018668286,0.0040545124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983061,0.00012391242,0.00025064964,0.00028368723,0.00024287966,0.00079275755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870527,0.00028364715,0.00007198331,0.00036644505,0.00013966867,0.00043300758],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086939224,0.0001238369,0.00013688428,0.0000493784,0.0026432176,0.00057603564,0.00056758954,0.00010974209,0.0005151702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029419395,0.00009636008,0.000085397965,0.00025371986,0.00025276904,0.00061709527,0.000063448766,0.00021286479,0.00031116672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015118815,0.000015671738,0.0014125364,0.0000035961646,0.0000063373313,6.855691e-7,0.0008588849,0.0000055256487,0.000054525863,0.98433584,0.011102779,0.0022020815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014663338,0.000008922493,0.0022557592,0.000012863683,0.000004473094,3.9008455e-7,0.0024088928,0.00012358912,0.000055499208,0.041245993,0.9535904,0.00014656494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8885712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98986155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94308984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024162483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005090564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122979037","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3045","title":"“By the Court”: The Untold Story of a Canadian Judicial Innovation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Headline; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.0329388229939824,"score_gpt":0.2842558277416419,"score_spread":0.2513170047476595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122979037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011664722,0.00014802623,0.00034621218,0.19600905,0.00024665223,0.00016520337,0.00003954592,0.000010317238,0.7913703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966729,0.000116540905,0.000032518543,0.0012017384,0.00046580783,0.0000063974676,6.8306906e-7,0.0000053821655,0.0014980009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906194,0.00016624849,0.00017899791,0.000067263245,0.00031038845,0.00021516149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923456,0.00016480811,0.00017080264,0.00013573344,0.00020241698,0.00009165648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014296414,0.000050160488,0.00006423555,0.00005535556,0.0023396185,0.00007841631,0.00044508843,0.00004881001,0.00022857585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013166643,0.000023466451,0.000039002967,0.00041300184,0.00036878276,0.0001334686,0.00001823822,0.00023939199,0.000024326371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022805023,0.000008326032,0.00012312496,3.445094e-7,0.000009513621,4.407855e-7,0.0008740803,0.0000010523017,0.0009586702,0.95817745,0.035525296,0.0043194033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013521104,0.0000112488615,0.0004825606,0.000012772303,0.000010244067,0.0000048770635,0.0010485532,0.000002384017,0.00024806813,0.04290456,0.9550917,0.000047810667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74966425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013335649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000510008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123041085","doi":"","title":"The Fusion of Law and Equity: A Canadian Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Equity (law); Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Common law; Fiduciary; Court of equity; Constructive trust; Confusion; Duty; Sociology; Law and economics; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.07348848615161258,"score_gpt":0.3591703704955806,"score_spread":0.285681884343968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123041085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0091762645,0.0008548182,0.00001213343,0.0025440573,0.0001052738,0.00022703366,0.00001044128,0.00002526503,0.9870447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665266,0.00014311037,0.000091719536,0.00018004527,0.00012517239,0.00002172936,6.190475e-7,0.0000068893796,0.0027780384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992347,0.000076824814,0.00012358656,0.0001608879,0.00011815965,0.00028583896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991894,0.00009174348,0.00004916363,0.00019851523,0.0002293412,0.00024183617],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005075377,0.00007036321,0.00009174244,0.000028685095,0.0013438999,0.000053276177,0.00030036672,0.000068170535,0.0001312923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008946748,0.000053312328,0.000040261668,0.0001920343,0.0007197918,0.00009797149,0.0001267395,0.000102359925,0.00009004252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003241421,0.000022811186,0.00012346351,0.0000021422718,0.000008225802,3.72985e-7,0.037745874,2.5316634e-8,0.00004280389,0.95887774,0.0006125234,0.0025607762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097730415,0.000024174746,0.0019122259,0.000009766749,0.0000145922495,5.5997873e-7,0.009538353,0.000014175738,0.0001940362,0.071222134,0.91688186,0.00009037431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6501303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9474928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014404138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042006388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123047564","doi":"10.1111/lest.12110","title":"Obligations in the shade: the application of fiduciary directors' duties to shadow directors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Shadow (psychology); Discretion; Law; Test (biology); Power (physics); Business; Law and economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Duty","score_opus":0.045843469942528595,"score_gpt":0.36345810189706035,"score_spread":0.31761463195453177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123047564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6708511,0.0019455712,0.0005965441,0.26022086,0.00029833542,0.0017441331,0.000067560955,0.00012084122,0.064155065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972918,0.00029836973,0.000066955545,0.00047292485,0.00021636648,0.00046514126,9.0438704e-7,0.0000053131853,0.001182248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989627,0.0001506702,0.00021341564,0.00017370413,0.0002973919,0.00020211517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987538,0.0007688046,0.00007811913,0.0002640565,0.000105164174,0.00003004741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072919903,0.00008477976,0.0001332735,0.00004084228,0.0006915754,0.000038417173,0.000452885,0.000032658692,0.000016465514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004553189,0.00003882057,0.000057077876,0.0006204177,0.0004026436,0.00014297132,0.0000952083,0.00007306579,0.000036987425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006960508,0.00008152601,0.029378103,0.000008758325,0.000044438388,3.1880646e-7,0.0505805,0.0000135352075,0.0008919332,0.88345665,0.008570538,0.026966767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009435448,0.000019533198,0.1838541,0.000033933193,0.00002008577,2.1043427e-7,0.015612834,0.0000043988953,0.000468959,0.009731733,0.790039,0.00012083855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010296876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030674987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8737249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008179165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005043548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99629366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123129785","doi":"","title":"Driedger's 'Modern Principle' at the Supreme Court of Canada: Interpretation, Justification, Legitimization","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statute; Law; Statutory law; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Common law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006355965112121163,"score_gpt":0.1903944770057369,"score_spread":0.18403851189361572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123129785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.700552,0.002525644,0.014033614,0.014628701,0.0005637043,0.000900422,0.0001372171,0.0001363369,0.26652235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96075004,0.000035279052,0.00016333631,0.00009107271,0.00012012291,0.000021279782,0.00006448212,0.0000074608915,0.038746916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864876,0.00009803239,0.00026429785,0.00022841696,0.00053339935,0.00022708862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989046,0.00010618628,0.00023725764,0.00026829695,0.00037866188,0.00010498738],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024387363,0.00010852921,0.00011408596,0.00004761677,0.0074922075,0.000035437803,0.00032472878,0.00007798716,0.000052441243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006197158,0.000103294886,0.00007030424,0.0002619595,0.00043737263,0.00021816423,0.000105721054,0.000091951944,0.00000712125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014365552,0.00015977904,0.032884743,0.00002840515,0.000086332824,0.000034456185,0.035078205,0.06298372,0.00620734,0.8424789,0.018837059,0.0010774183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004520231,0.0000144961305,0.108155385,0.000032245112,0.00010960988,0.000034436285,0.009751962,0.009026104,0.0048392396,0.0022487417,0.8650324,0.00030338945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7584439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.886863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004311183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028864814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123161047","doi":"","title":"Constructive Trusts from a Law and Economics Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Constructive; Unjust enrichment; Unconscionability; Express trust; Plaintiff; Function (biology); Law and economics; Settlor; Deterrence theory; Law; Political science; Business; Economics; Process (computing); Computer science; Restitution","score_opus":0.018248053692312083,"score_gpt":0.24718779746965003,"score_spread":0.22893974377733795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123161047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23009634,0.0000015391186,0.00020189819,0.0009904557,0.0000643983,0.00030256016,0.000089898116,0.000079993,0.7681729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98019636,0.017940434,0.001475279,0.0002048566,0.00014519607,0.0000020144766,0.0000052401797,0.000009076281,0.000021569089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992588,0.00005544978,0.00007276353,0.0003226411,0.00007708609,0.00021324398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995187,0.000067718676,0.00006608442,0.00015130392,0.000093301554,0.000102906335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006885794,0.00010565351,0.00013056297,0.0008623095,0.0005900895,0.000079944315,0.00020953322,0.000090864,0.000025439615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024392783,0.0001229388,0.00005546583,0.0013228914,0.0005507622,0.00043323947,0.000104693005,0.00013147222,0.000018509838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020593254,0.000041503194,0.00013335353,0.0000011155718,0.000036051555,0.000008915784,0.038338427,0.000011272972,0.0000017839427,0.9604026,0.0000044399108,0.0009999443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007428512,0.00002411931,0.00015242762,0.000008110518,0.000037807644,0.0000012261225,0.033749893,0.00000922126,0.00007601325,0.0015035113,0.9635289,0.00016596058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7320744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37049598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9635244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064094516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059943873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64099085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123311483","doi":"10.1016/j.jfo.2021.08.005","title":"The Stolen Generation: Canadian and Australian Approaches to Fiduciary Duties","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Commonwealth; Law; Duty; Duty of care; Extinguishment; Settlement (finance); Tort; Equity (law); Project commissioning; Political science; High Court; Economic Justice; Sociology; Publishing; Business; Liability","score_opus":0.08877325669289206,"score_gpt":0.28074946650017363,"score_spread":0.19197620980728158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123311483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4576262,0.0058040633,0.0011128614,0.37041876,0.0005598423,0.0008393962,0.0000106120415,0.00004873464,0.16357952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822521,0.0011160283,0.0000871743,0.00018486829,0.00036758796,0.000011674271,6.9715065e-7,0.0000052477217,0.01597458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984129,0.00011744295,0.00010122567,0.00009953961,0.00013882155,0.0011300775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961025,0.00002383726,0.00003139231,0.00008597448,0.000028785274,0.00021974473],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017117714,0.000056992736,0.000049177383,0.000032878,0.0025274,0.00024705552,0.0001678923,0.000040388346,0.00002556243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006589528,0.000042728065,0.00002498358,0.00013518379,0.00008564702,0.00010109342,0.000007558054,0.00044123584,0.000016024247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.536136e-7,0.000003181546,0.00043751352,1.9690812e-7,0.00001212171,2.1333344e-7,0.0012599491,0.000016666445,0.0000062287104,0.9913831,0.0010293887,0.0058507873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005551602,0.000022796232,0.00040630775,0.0000013519137,0.000007382788,0.000022066253,0.01410808,0.000009438698,0.000017458915,0.1120521,0.8732182,0.00007930743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03532868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8769209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.879331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000574935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037554516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W312332631","doi":"","title":"The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Law; Recklessness; Damages; Punishment (psychology); Malice; Civil law (Civil law); Criminal law; Strict liability; Legal liability; Political science; Common law; Harm; Liability; Public law; Psychology","score_opus":0.04235538640228112,"score_gpt":0.3418535535635373,"score_spread":0.2994981671612562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W312332631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93900436,0.0006352371,0.0006616244,0.0028582134,0.00027235143,0.00022044602,0.000019827496,0.00001969688,0.056308232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715215,0.0009151461,0.0001428949,0.00017222948,0.00020990339,0.0000023846253,0.0000010813399,0.000006938464,0.0013973017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849766,0.00025751966,0.00040981523,0.00011426269,0.00040433402,0.0003164323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983908,0.0008014556,0.00020162815,0.0001464946,0.00033629863,0.00012334336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036875461,0.000076257274,0.00012462342,0.00004845181,0.00084785774,0.000117604395,0.00030635254,0.000045737204,0.00009539941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005280672,0.00004885827,0.00006051185,0.0005269473,0.0005318581,0.00020970455,0.000025700348,0.00032002607,0.000010297572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011183359,0.0008892283,0.028664479,0.000029560266,0.00016882409,0.0005050295,0.22826576,0.00017690836,0.0031926634,0.6018135,0.010220702,0.12495504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000791829,0.000096656186,0.04545507,0.0000603328,0.000027775253,0.00005490271,0.048714813,0.00002949136,0.00033535913,0.0024803204,0.90175146,0.00020199742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040971473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007196362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89153075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102173326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028320972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6521122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123354388","doi":"","title":"Conduct of laws: Native title, responsibility, and some limits of jurisdictional thinking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Harvard University","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous; Common law; Political science; High Court; Authorization; Project commissioning; Publishing; Computer science","score_opus":0.04742674431407897,"score_gpt":0.31034181384467624,"score_spread":0.2629150695305973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123354388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412525,0.00050254486,0.000026436055,0.0003872647,0.00011031115,0.00009609223,0.0000092822165,0.000011480874,0.05760405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581,0.00018273162,0.00021924445,0.000009990089,0.00007180654,1.2697683e-7,0.0000011991586,0.0000018260288,0.003703111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947315,0.0000726907,0.00009406239,0.00007703564,0.00020511891,0.00007792527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956846,0.00009466407,0.00015027625,0.00006988867,0.0000654376,0.00005125332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003510522,0.00003343393,0.000087954315,0.00003692711,0.00017184726,0.0000019984968,0.00014159923,0.00008529253,0.00005337725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023980816,0.00003759547,0.000038504386,0.000084953244,0.00033119545,0.0002271686,0.000051378534,0.000116981566,0.0000041060994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005669381,0.00013148681,0.10818373,0.000066768145,0.00008426465,9.4750845e-7,0.04302063,0.000004880512,0.022050867,0.81957895,0.0062053073,0.00061546406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011900545,0.00014622569,0.53122413,0.0003043946,0.0002891817,0.000009153982,0.03687006,0.00010619602,0.02455794,0.03591702,0.36890253,0.00048314122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000304873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000096852555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78366196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046499605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008865573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15330987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123407248","doi":"","title":"The Ultrahazardous Activity of Excluding Family Members in Canada’s Immigration System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Immigration; Immigration law; Government (linguistics); Tort; Law; Family member; Political science; Refugee; Liability; Immigration policy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03402826484743648,"score_gpt":0.2806383058229981,"score_spread":0.2466100409755616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123407248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19206229,0.052157942,0.00005043007,0.5788322,0.00058470736,0.0034975833,0.00018032592,0.00003972492,0.17259476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832208,0.015908148,0.0000023170599,0.00037589506,0.00003613915,0.00004042593,3.8299171e-7,0.000004097349,0.00041178148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990986,0.00023282573,0.00016616465,0.00008661114,0.00018814504,0.00022764548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928063,0.00021198166,0.000094532115,0.00023376971,0.000048738097,0.00013036896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00109881,0.000052780815,0.0001230304,0.0000132413725,0.0005678165,0.00001881445,0.00031960045,0.000019919493,0.000021082042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012616867,0.000025912486,0.000036043035,0.00019496174,0.00009423618,0.00005646827,0.000008906663,0.00005723043,0.000012992435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002678364,0.000004459078,0.0015660777,0.00034925144,0.000024528903,0.000004321289,0.0012699788,0.000006013095,0.00027779705,0.7398738,0.015727283,0.24089377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034404242,0.0000017346894,0.0065346668,0.00071069074,0.000012889557,5.606149e-7,0.00081818213,0.000008349668,0.000021504804,0.000047501584,0.9917494,0.00006011164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002012379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053932616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95674145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123480558","doi":"","title":"Punitive damages and European law: quo vademus?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Plaintiff; Tort; Law; Political science; Common law; Harm; Business; Liability","score_opus":0.037061641887971716,"score_gpt":0.23940960631502695,"score_spread":0.20234796442705522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123480558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095566193,0.0015090274,0.00033373933,0.0017774934,0.00020481771,0.00063162774,0.00047367875,0.0003502033,0.99376374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14912891,0.22777776,0.00026186474,0.00065086497,0.0008716526,3.6354692e-7,0.00021131443,0.00010666621,0.6209906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710965,0.00035162625,0.00025556167,0.0008190548,0.0006932081,0.0007708983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977408,0.0002235014,0.0004627841,0.00045189288,0.00026245648,0.0008585478],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006158844,0.0005234992,0.00046072106,0.011828762,0.0021523242,0.00010922917,0.0014063813,0.0008875443,0.0005901154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008200283,0.00067776407,0.000486759,0.004427306,0.0021646968,0.0012442613,0.0009526754,0.0018129167,0.00018827316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000368454,0.000038286253,0.0012264682,0.000027327938,0.00023589047,0.0000832029,0.0017295593,0.0000013037912,0.000016495753,0.98191464,0.0132698,0.0014201823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055132306,0.00003492358,0.001490219,0.00014940616,0.0005811587,0.000002722012,0.004029882,0.0000010677983,0.0000033652948,0.004343354,0.98809206,0.0007205416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001920488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005152816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002425133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012472984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123527755","doi":"","title":"Corporate Law Federalism in Historical Context: Comparing Canada and the United States","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Federalism; Statute; Corporate governance; Regulatory competition; Political science; Federal law; Common law; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Competition law; Law; Political economy; Economics; Legislation; Market economy; Monopoly; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.0372461504406499,"score_gpt":0.26847891192514123,"score_spread":0.23123276148449134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123527755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92716765,0.00021502914,0.00003871051,0.020124925,0.00027870495,0.00032982463,0.000011557994,0.000048937003,0.051784664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929594,0.00003038973,0.00004371703,0.0046923547,0.00020441804,0.000023020879,0.000010194638,0.0000067866854,0.0020297212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990076,0.00017490993,0.00019090714,0.0001674473,0.00021105254,0.00024810692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932307,0.0001717685,0.00009692961,0.00015683546,0.0000921363,0.00015924139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046787353,0.00008150659,0.00015653377,0.000015891748,0.0010341858,0.0001716401,0.00022151326,0.000042265016,0.000056489902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056314893,0.00006220275,0.000018765359,0.00024901665,0.0006506718,0.00011113458,0.00006470203,0.00018708914,0.000018259572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018167699,0.000010862494,0.005047473,0.0000020921232,0.00000525834,0.0000023911225,0.0015458008,0.000012889173,0.000005132357,0.9875332,0.0057640322,0.000052715117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006173863,0.000008367693,0.0019171486,0.000010406719,0.000005466563,5.699856e-7,0.0010558795,0.0004316733,0.000020079073,0.014536039,0.981291,0.00010598323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046397294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021419523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7954225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123532847","doi":"","title":"Proprietary Remedies in Insolvency: A Comparison of the Restatement (Third) of Restitution & Unjust Enrichment with English and Commonwealth Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Commonwealth; Unjust enrichment; Misrepresentation; Common law; Political science; Private law; English law; Tort; Mistake; Fiduciary; Pleading; Civil law (Civil law); Plaintiff; Sociology; Public law; Liability; Duty","score_opus":0.06400497655399724,"score_gpt":0.331066101320112,"score_spread":0.26706112476611477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123532847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60879314,0.106406115,0.000040952746,0.011901163,0.00020036536,0.0047135516,0.000024154242,0.00006705387,0.2678535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779177,0.02125134,0.000359081,0.00039827503,0.0000142792105,0.0000308781,0.00000183317,0.0000031079703,0.000023516235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900156,0.00018081164,0.0003479713,0.00013241176,0.00021897475,0.00011828462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994364,0.000036304442,0.00022072099,0.00017927126,0.00007806473,0.000049287988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009089339,0.00007206555,0.00025735455,0.000011086939,0.0002230528,0.000011818993,0.00014341838,0.00003243209,0.0000069474963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004101751,0.000044223787,0.000023242257,0.00017505685,0.0006418489,0.00014473312,0.00006661439,0.00013469986,2.77599e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009912263,0.00010639741,0.012327443,0.0010294493,0.0000072430103,2.2439805e-7,0.01705954,6.4017706e-7,0.00001576222,0.96804655,0.000120547316,0.0012762732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053770817,0.00027325007,0.025114512,0.00762857,0.0001275186,6.980366e-7,0.004139367,0.000013567427,0.0005496452,0.004550605,0.95684785,0.00021669228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023842352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052679967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96349597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002733915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072721465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98265797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123764048","doi":"","title":"Public Institutions as Defamation Plaintiffs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decree; Political science; Law; Normative; Plaintiff; Institution; Reputation; Humanities; Public institution; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05850864799577541,"score_gpt":0.31402973982863563,"score_spread":0.2555210918328602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123764048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13117069,0.000070605995,0.0034789813,0.0481445,0.00034791735,0.0003777342,0.00003454941,0.00032380968,0.8160512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873965,0.00006216,0.00041120575,0.0008890536,0.0004101555,0.000083469065,0.000007984134,0.000008159286,0.010731336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889934,0.00008656909,0.00018139493,0.00021883905,0.00029941255,0.0003144722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913126,0.00009555357,0.0000688192,0.00028374218,0.00013277862,0.00028783406],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004018948,0.00008267658,0.00008647779,0.000041737687,0.001260484,0.00022485394,0.00032826318,0.000095361924,0.0017134801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004788669,0.0000627804,0.000064232416,0.00028687745,0.0003608791,0.00080635864,0.00006060097,0.00009834106,0.005455996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013643274,0.00003230282,0.00068488537,0.0000014741871,0.0000058716346,7.016323e-7,0.00020470259,0.000001139439,0.0005765239,0.99327165,0.0023147976,0.002904577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018881143,0.000008552412,0.001340042,0.000014943562,0.0000056877216,9.480915e-7,0.00018824778,0.0000020943069,0.0002387632,0.036610942,0.96128803,0.00011291651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053772847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01756949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019481106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004291314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123793227","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2037","title":"How tort law empowers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Delict; Redress; Political science; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Scrutiny; Sociology; Law and economics; Black letter law; Liability","score_opus":0.011350819186203726,"score_gpt":0.2362524998717011,"score_spread":0.22490168068549737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123793227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008035085,0.000079654405,0.0021045934,0.0045976243,0.00014316503,0.00004930844,0.000003780169,0.000019483163,0.9849673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277323,0.00009491751,0.0011830977,0.00010286351,0.00018917344,1.8730168e-8,5.3391904e-7,0.0000023869666,0.005653793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947745,0.00006628759,0.000048134367,0.00006952751,0.00020314929,0.0001354558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955136,0.00002657291,0.000086975495,0.00009062609,0.00009728439,0.00014719015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028597316,0.0000399483,0.00007852574,0.0000047049784,0.0011891088,0.00006667153,0.00029254035,0.00004509457,0.00053881115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011841144,0.000043464126,0.00007809708,0.000016325273,0.0002889488,0.0005288879,0.00003464035,0.00007448999,0.000007476776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005575845,0.000018816054,0.00012916235,0.0000011417203,0.000010838704,0.000001461224,0.003022961,0.0000026813982,0.000057975252,0.99351156,0.0018238218,0.0014140309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016892541,0.000022985567,0.00036881724,0.0000053482254,0.000012355783,0.0000014387201,0.00939275,0.000008706947,0.000016329835,0.0013208314,0.98862755,0.000053967153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15809794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4663198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018457547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000418324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9145784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123888961","doi":"","title":"Enforcing Takings Clauses in China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Constitution; Property rights; Lease; Just compensation; Property law; Land law; Law and economics; China; Law; Public property; Political science; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Business; Private property; Land tenure; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0168756007373681,"score_gpt":0.29083129755192555,"score_spread":0.27395569681455745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123888961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48246548,0.000060298014,0.0003923403,0.0031527707,0.0001808177,0.00025687212,0.0000032039788,0.00012875549,0.5133594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996138,0.000021572758,0.000558603,0.0007510929,0.00042412998,0.000047791586,0.0000025948098,0.000010088555,0.0020461641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990005,0.00008643274,0.0001775545,0.00020095028,0.00021987996,0.00031468604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994457,0.000103993465,0.00006420784,0.00021393535,0.000025761688,0.00014644925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006272139,0.00008110635,0.000119314725,0.000034113713,0.0004642426,0.00014755421,0.00030481565,0.00007826121,0.000400887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027015584,0.00007954372,0.00004647515,0.0002582276,0.00013298003,0.0002959334,0.000057277357,0.00020515092,0.00040562556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001845828,0.000019527464,0.00865676,0.0000042549077,0.000001949278,6.146232e-7,0.0013517733,0.000039416584,0.0001708142,0.9874545,0.00045979596,0.0018387636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017566286,0.000010734135,0.022256237,0.000024100382,0.000003489919,2.923671e-7,0.0002696834,0.000095227035,0.00017754968,0.013449271,0.9634043,0.00013345707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047477003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047444202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9740052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008310091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064448664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96993744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123910214","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1520765","title":"A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The U.K. Or Canada as a Model?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029291514693326904,"score_gpt":0.3362573757446984,"score_spread":0.30696586105137147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123910214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8728565,0.0004227099,0.005851181,0.10294318,0.00016967664,0.0009742923,0.00004625619,0.00002500373,0.016711215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98450524,0.00010018977,0.00007454535,0.0002828723,0.00023912176,0.000009380959,9.465333e-7,0.0000031283562,0.014784578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985555,0.000031271207,0.00016858103,0.00008411951,0.000232972,0.0009275879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959046,0.000047056452,0.00011029125,0.0000947329,0.0000912469,0.00006623337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006835862,0.00006168519,0.00009102196,0.000014862911,0.0006667939,0.00003727922,0.00031916288,0.000035010602,0.000048232352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003202447,0.000035735146,0.00006515225,0.00010770141,0.000058097223,0.00007894389,0.000005598832,0.00036210183,0.0000022105148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033499262,0.000023837807,0.0000101521655,7.059075e-7,0.00002122455,4.0765082e-7,0.00073975546,0.000043047126,0.00007962753,0.9958803,0.0023714574,0.00079599064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003420075,0.00020205528,0.00010936779,0.000007470118,0.000037478567,0.000027761735,0.002484601,0.00046116026,0.00013275375,0.80568844,0.19039695,0.00010993604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3379434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9564658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6185224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004984543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068529723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123928056","doi":"","title":"Protecting Individual Self-Interest in Aggregate as the Basis of Fairness in Contract","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Unconscionability; Law and economics; Mistake; Excuse; Premise; Frustration of purpose; Business; Exclusion clause; Order (exchange); Contract management; Economics; Law; Privity of contract; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03851352461494153,"score_gpt":0.3301190831894587,"score_spread":0.2916055585745172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123928056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98656553,0.0002319119,0.00005882428,0.007632221,0.000051945284,0.00028502903,0.0000013763514,0.000008960548,0.005164205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899757,0.00061717693,0.000016468444,0.000030717325,0.00014682049,0.000018903871,2.0281692e-7,0.000006477557,0.00016567713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826396,0.000218141,0.00024868958,0.000110892724,0.00019463619,0.00096370064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992452,0.000110263776,0.00037320962,0.00018127708,0.00005019174,0.000039860235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052530817,0.00006908286,0.00012448334,0.00005856285,0.0009892068,0.0001919057,0.0008111999,0.0000620841,0.000017223407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052530697,0.00005074019,0.000057693258,0.00012172227,0.00012962474,0.0002781452,0.000064683016,0.0015775239,0.0000072222315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024908426,0.00012932639,0.04800712,0.000004409604,0.00005216194,0.000004480259,0.011966521,0.000014605615,0.00016679797,0.8882433,0.000003534685,0.051382825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024402535,0.0002477808,0.21964547,0.00024491842,0.000054187967,0.00009116678,0.051936824,0.00018616841,0.0015322772,0.7132047,0.010009537,0.0004067066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014950343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22747056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21252023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004173808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018067039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124101900","doi":"","title":"Punitive Damages: A Comparative Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Working Paper Series","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.055976559127013804,"score_gpt":0.33893352445554137,"score_spread":0.28295696532852754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124101900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19067861,0.00021920497,0.0010230914,0.011184315,0.000108723965,0.00024558415,0.000009931138,0.00021292444,0.79631764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995459,0.00006388353,0.0011990019,0.00031301624,0.00012677988,0.000031906216,0.000009003173,0.0000033807491,0.0027939854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993269,0.000056020934,0.000104445375,0.00015489769,0.0001677171,0.00019001185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996378,0.000051286555,0.000049808987,0.0001425539,0.000052073832,0.00006649196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015027038,0.000071447954,0.00013883991,0.000057795103,0.0008310563,0.00013600008,0.00016898982,0.000040079685,0.00018197727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020333231,0.00006696281,0.00008121614,0.0010397612,0.00029781318,0.00023659864,0.000037146758,0.000091061316,0.00006538568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006687966,0.000033797325,0.0028814767,9.751227e-7,0.00015130999,0.000002228986,0.07066002,0.00053402374,0.00010434568,0.92504877,0.000072388124,0.0005039601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012681304,0.000014843798,0.027006093,0.00001572236,0.00014073291,2.8752575e-7,0.039055787,0.0000021875014,0.00014725284,0.009255443,0.9240722,0.00016263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022021343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03286651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92399985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007018922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087814165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98478115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124134379","doi":"10.29173/alr150","title":"&lt;i&gt;Fullowka v. Pinkerton’s of Canada Ltd.&lt;/i&gt; and the Material Contribution Test for Factual Causation in Negligence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Duty of care; Duty; Liability; Law; Supreme court; Test (biology); Tort; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.020722269570043583,"score_gpt":0.2677110012084302,"score_spread":0.24698873163838664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124134379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5587026,0.06539855,0.00087037665,0.09148895,0.0019374496,0.024905197,0.0011035918,0.00010908186,0.2554842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921563,0.0065014483,0.000048335045,0.0006723064,0.000054275555,0.00018567563,0.00002790495,0.0000058731025,0.00034786476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902713,0.00011182235,0.0003389319,0.00015647293,0.00015663952,0.00020902415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890685,0.00055306224,0.00017184009,0.00017254445,0.00013433846,0.00006136451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000635177,0.000086885666,0.0002490069,0.000007895815,0.0002913605,0.000021810212,0.00019345543,0.000048182017,0.00014551175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088886905,0.000061953855,0.000040732473,0.00015182592,0.00023500485,0.000115230505,0.00003386921,0.00004143947,0.0000036179729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009785838,0.000022138258,0.00016247838,0.000116478266,0.0000068279737,1.5664483e-7,0.00087833154,1.8728255e-7,0.00025473672,0.99667716,0.00094270124,0.00092901196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003788713,0.000020904203,0.0024284767,0.00034407876,0.000057183683,9.5278494e-7,0.000035176185,0.00001642138,0.000510196,0.001910169,0.9941738,0.00012373333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7141054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9670359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095896896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029911654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2877984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124135338","doi":"","title":"Deferred Prosecution Agreements and the Presumption of Innocence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Presumption of innocence; Presumption; Law; Framing (construction); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02238962805129889,"score_gpt":0.33931882282714465,"score_spread":0.31692919477584575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124135338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7990423,0.000028124776,0.001922587,0.0029944987,0.000041434236,0.00039459203,0.0000018810572,0.000020166437,0.19555447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998144,0.000034423705,0.00021536811,0.00006695339,0.000058756934,0.00001210683,5.3945485e-7,7.5086484e-7,0.0014671335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970096,0.000034586094,0.00006338919,0.000052294192,0.00009527472,0.00005348272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998063,0.000022417375,0.00003450897,0.00006159697,0.00006069581,0.000014522736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029628596,0.000017463979,0.000027252223,0.0000067690867,0.00023448771,0.00001817586,0.000068189875,0.00001535254,0.00006297373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042436637,0.000010588899,0.000008096378,0.000084209285,0.0005065146,0.000069512666,0.00002513128,0.00001616505,0.000012971548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013147814,0.000012117196,0.0029276903,0.0000018924095,0.0000028044642,5.4996043e-9,0.0063179415,1.4197603e-7,0.00044755428,0.9857572,0.00035530108,0.004164256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030863064,0.00014600255,0.33451757,0.00004546093,0.000059903756,7.56224e-7,0.013511609,0.0023005968,0.009831617,0.14563619,0.49056226,0.0003017214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017066962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010295783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.840121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069678504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018278628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25800255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124185421","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3189","title":"Unreasonable Disagreement?: Judicial–Executive Exchanges about Charter Reasonableness in the Harper Era","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Separation of powers","score_opus":0.04362164220324371,"score_gpt":0.34413296860989434,"score_spread":0.3005113264066506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124185421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0111187445,0.00048162468,0.00012964143,0.03432963,0.0003520992,0.00034181736,0.000023204731,0.00002096396,0.95320225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99359715,0.000795048,0.0001534772,0.0010113297,0.0012591493,0.00006217796,0.0000033729914,0.000014350351,0.0031039156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809897,0.00025590253,0.00024778373,0.00023446845,0.0006012475,0.0005616193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882203,0.00010655709,0.00028735623,0.00047920787,0.00013743932,0.00016739502],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018312554,0.00014861042,0.00019036604,0.000031834374,0.0057902564,0.0012997357,0.0012737159,0.00010180238,0.00044981996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011990626,0.0001055321,0.000108877706,0.00009457936,0.0004705887,0.00078951195,0.00011319158,0.00048890815,0.00009505302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014792671,0.00011612578,0.0035494121,0.0000043177206,0.000019776664,0.00002927758,0.0073125986,0.000004181672,0.00003692928,0.9810706,0.0034808004,0.0043612043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008270869,0.000043727123,0.059439115,0.00016218753,0.000047538433,0.000032881304,0.009435404,0.000043096577,0.00007251547,0.13562204,0.79393595,0.0003384306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.124460615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4087284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98247844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013161887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014615287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124215937","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3502451","title":"The Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Performance: A Scottish-Canadian Comparison","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Good faith; Faith; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.013385996024141037,"score_gpt":0.3117867513802123,"score_spread":0.29840075535607125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124215937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683895,0.00051055686,0.00014598608,0.0023235173,0.00010767185,0.00018016271,0.0000022844122,0.000008120485,0.028332172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727196,0.0012292466,0.000022143575,0.000044959703,0.00034462623,0.0000061462465,6.23296e-7,0.000006329603,0.0010739482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977523,0.00008992084,0.00027387237,0.00009456285,0.00025421148,0.0015351042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999416,0.000067381145,0.00014612173,0.00011973437,0.00012292054,0.00012782223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025932626,0.00006521027,0.00011276782,0.000063823434,0.0011456856,0.000079569065,0.00043461018,0.000059063736,0.00003816837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008826433,0.000048659233,0.000042490952,0.0002805443,0.0003201612,0.00015975256,0.000019387264,0.00084480253,0.000035268855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015722366,0.00003281616,0.038800996,9.647232e-7,0.00001979785,1.9059351e-7,0.0021595608,0.000008618061,0.000028629494,0.9425355,0.00005314988,0.01634405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007977896,0.00044366348,0.06586671,0.00003370673,0.00001968993,0.000021489974,0.015220092,0.00069707603,0.00021594124,0.04009573,0.87637085,0.00021723707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031427927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8625442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9024398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087745267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006216036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124239048","doi":"","title":"Pseudo-Contract and Shared Meaning Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Severability; Frustration of purpose; Exclusion clause; Unconscionability; Contract theory; Law; Obligation; Law and economics; Contract management; Sociology; Political science; Privity of contract; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02490840732855197,"score_gpt":0.31745163871863824,"score_spread":0.29254323139008626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124239048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009395186,0.010941108,0.00009695939,0.005224054,0.00007681267,0.001160204,0.000031246327,0.00012213606,0.9729523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648821,0.029191775,0.0005222118,0.0035199132,0.00007359881,0.000040391777,0.000015588354,0.0000072515604,0.0017471792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992378,0.00008344467,0.00016698644,0.00018574728,0.00016775713,0.00015830362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949956,0.000065776854,0.00007704084,0.00021637235,0.000049862185,0.000091370195],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005753992,0.00006450455,0.00025704116,0.000016542841,0.00021706188,0.000096226984,0.00015030502,0.000031916916,0.0042720116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004682737,0.00005465981,0.00012251204,0.00039873284,0.00005190499,0.00018668798,0.000035095054,0.000069439615,0.0012813965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6665645e-7,0.000008767417,0.0014534832,0.0001322362,0.00006349938,4.5586808e-7,0.00024499447,6.8755054e-7,0.000018434437,0.9942835,0.00041145025,0.003382025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047755402,0.0000034153168,0.0016227965,0.0001954263,0.00028020504,2.8940437e-7,0.000021417663,0.00005358001,0.0000021441251,0.00051189226,0.9971806,0.00008052407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025604586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018993359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99676913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023354387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029786446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124319938","doi":"","title":"The republican virtues of the&#13;\\n“new commonwealth model of&#13;\\nconstitutionalism”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Commonwealth; Democracy; Politics; Legislature; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13269551133350532,"score_gpt":0.3662191529234123,"score_spread":0.23352364158990696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124319938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39969045,0.000032000375,0.0046662195,0.009555192,0.00073729403,0.0009895937,0.00026656134,0.00006551121,0.5839972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946312,0.0001911832,0.00045616264,0.00012113812,0.0001421637,9.4550535e-7,0.000018983965,0.000007104362,0.05275029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972441,0.00037528138,0.00042812023,0.00056831224,0.000989343,0.00039482355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953719,0.00029758245,0.0012634954,0.001487195,0.0011827077,0.00039712156],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010827938,0.00023563304,0.00038660542,0.00026323993,0.0165172,0.0013457953,0.011901475,0.00025816794,0.00006198732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006571323,0.00021544205,0.0003255854,0.00093464466,0.005793873,0.005518389,0.0048108967,0.0005105172,0.000002627282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016538941,0.00026293698,0.044931296,0.000015257769,0.000088116576,0.00000904201,0.00035343505,0.0017007015,0.000054977143,0.9486979,0.0031963363,0.00052455754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001791187,0.00003489837,0.06969581,0.00017614882,0.00013291981,0.000008318818,0.0026126055,0.0020124062,0.0005922891,0.012350556,0.91007614,0.000516727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103727594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05093258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9363474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083805854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012698597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124428142","doi":"","title":"Precedent Revisited: Carter v Canada (AG) and the Contemporary Practice of Precedent","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Hierarchy; Common law","score_opus":0.016948087358760515,"score_gpt":0.27993513822330585,"score_spread":0.2629870508645453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124428142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12213264,0.0033851608,0.0001861241,0.11783163,0.00040522523,0.0017775189,0.00014679422,0.000073651034,0.7540613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99263686,0.00028672858,0.00010469327,0.0013584003,0.0001919492,0.000056159675,0.0000017404017,0.000007702691,0.005355782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865556,0.0003063344,0.00025683353,0.00020011084,0.00039025146,0.00019090816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850565,0.0006734975,0.00018727506,0.00031027355,0.00015819055,0.00016511299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087196426,0.00008705667,0.00016139062,0.000009869548,0.000377785,0.00007400403,0.00027569305,0.000048672748,0.00014879658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005246851,0.000049241666,0.000042365726,0.00010772064,0.0003678452,0.00033519225,0.000087458175,0.00010401472,0.000021865191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008547325,0.000042046224,0.004332671,0.000019674615,0.00005795081,0.0000026849366,0.0019969882,0.0000010412316,0.0002728324,0.9594984,0.032271244,0.0014189933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006084861,0.000013205206,0.0010675248,0.000049855327,0.000022404829,0.0000015740973,0.0014546105,0.0000024016601,0.0002526324,0.0010396373,0.9953975,0.00009016763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7781386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7278659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96312624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011364911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005226828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2905655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124528875","doi":"10.1111/1467-6281.00116/pdf","title":"Commonwealth Convergence Toward a Narrower Scope of Auditor Liability to Third Parties for Negligent Misstatements","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Commonwealth; Audit; Scope (computer science); Accounting; Business; Convergence (economics); Balance (ability); Law and economics; Legal liability; Political science; Law; Economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.055161085043978736,"score_gpt":0.25485811333399216,"score_spread":0.19969702829001343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124528875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691403,0.00007066694,0.0064634755,0.0019516933,0.00044998227,0.0011678631,0.003040621,0.00010074259,0.017614689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964951,0.000045128276,0.0010232546,0.000024822497,0.000083685874,6.677145e-7,0.000036910413,0.000013966763,0.0022764087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978787,0.000088867055,0.0003436695,0.00048335042,0.00068579585,0.00051966397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760574,0.00018245954,0.0005084248,0.0005907881,0.0006379758,0.0004746056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039417902,0.00024194758,0.0005944388,0.00020709088,0.0009910038,0.00004188982,0.0012505508,0.00016566222,0.0003426619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012897255,0.0003259879,0.0003794669,0.0007059644,0.0011839813,0.00075801264,0.00046860497,0.00019109901,0.000081543396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002039424,0.0013740223,0.1565527,0.0010402716,0.0007463892,0.000024395844,0.76557976,0.0011061035,0.00031857067,0.038669128,0.029101465,0.0034477545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038652604,0.0010703077,0.026246238,0.00036549673,0.00039024357,6.6819644e-7,0.59070927,0.0009865104,0.00059096725,0.0010535467,0.3734057,0.0013157938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023705633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010291445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34430423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002069627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022563104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124532658","doi":"","title":"Constitutionalizing Leviathan: A Critique of Buchanan’s Conception of Lawmaking","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Normative; Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Positivism; Politics; Constitutional law; Sociology; Economics; Legislature","score_opus":0.016266327779874603,"score_gpt":0.32376778504982184,"score_spread":0.30750145726994726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124532658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92048514,0.0019877264,0.017150253,0.0024100547,0.0002091836,0.00031190465,0.0000095549485,0.000022531442,0.057413653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780995,0.001153038,0.00011000118,0.000042689157,0.00015656959,0.0000027342799,0.0000011627183,0.000004006792,0.0007198757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878657,0.00007839555,0.00022677536,0.00008214779,0.00024374836,0.0005823729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999447,0.000055223532,0.00021476291,0.000074563635,0.00017329908,0.00003518725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013744327,0.00004931076,0.00012297065,0.000047201727,0.00018243578,0.000014868367,0.00017007966,0.000052928466,0.000102993436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061760555,0.000047733185,0.00008209747,0.00014788762,0.00014537819,0.00016963395,0.000016938293,0.00039622316,0.000012635521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005185591,0.000021270538,0.0020710318,0.000005394861,0.00001967784,9.926373e-8,0.00079227827,0.000032016484,0.0037553492,0.991796,0.00001124958,0.0014904509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013551492,0.00033546376,0.0014194541,0.00032380212,0.000077395925,0.00006596122,0.050132174,0.00013747136,0.0026820523,0.83930486,0.10379136,0.0003748355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013467434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003095682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15249112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031816028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024350933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4319751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124631602","doi":"","title":"\"Government Wrongs\": Civil liability for Gmo regulation in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Agricoltura Istituzioni Mercati","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Liability; Government regulation; Business; Legal liability; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.016516023227273087,"score_gpt":0.2574022066911738,"score_spread":0.24088618346390073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124631602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5033643,0.0008127418,0.0035494142,0.13431972,0.00295412,0.010668085,0.0010173025,0.00018077115,0.34313354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919848,0.000116673094,0.00043717577,0.0007652067,0.00046390973,0.00018551912,0.000056688907,0.000010963898,0.005979067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970158,0.00012989351,0.00068126153,0.00062789617,0.0009054487,0.0006397397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847215,0.0003147577,0.00031712465,0.00046158742,0.00018439296,0.00024999818],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006485224,0.00027744105,0.0003593748,0.000026051961,0.00071254536,0.00015499807,0.0004981063,0.00016268401,0.0003206774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003029502,0.00025588035,0.00011960705,0.00072865386,0.00011175497,0.0003037375,0.00005206539,0.000234591,0.00003300739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011590517,0.0010278234,0.0123431105,0.00012334423,0.000059033806,0.000004752107,0.006047376,0.0039820536,0.0013526696,0.87785274,0.047800656,0.049290538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051152566,0.000080223304,0.43897572,0.00006411577,0.000052683416,6.810011e-7,0.0022934375,0.0014341514,0.00026968156,0.0055557904,0.55031383,0.00044813324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83968747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00531077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023507306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124649254","doi":"","title":"‘Losses in Any Event’ in the Case of Damage to Property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Appeal; Property (philosophy); Relevance (law); Position (finance); Event (particle physics); Law; Common law; Law and economics; Forensic engineering; Political science; Business; Philosophy; Economics; Engineering; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.035819992935596956,"score_gpt":0.34735746949233404,"score_spread":0.3115374765567371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124649254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97942114,0.00031149806,0.0001855358,0.010818986,0.000025930058,0.00021005922,0.0000011725645,0.000004003999,0.009021669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987241,0.00017577449,0.00003246036,0.00009499969,0.000098243305,0.000010418535,1.8002439e-7,0.000003350843,0.00086047093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986969,0.00019684837,0.00016762139,0.0000729111,0.00015787447,0.0007078353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996978,0.000035534118,0.00005327847,0.00009591586,0.00005469092,0.00006280085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003907483,0.00004253924,0.00007195057,0.00005744276,0.00012477714,0.000034975365,0.00029228604,0.00002716837,0.000007645905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018409878,0.000024063584,0.00002614761,0.0004170339,0.000047369376,0.000120680255,0.00002294088,0.0005350067,0.00000942738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028967157,0.00024751187,0.010041714,0.000003159971,0.000010758513,0.00008936588,0.033526327,0.00024515684,0.00011655749,0.93891954,0.00046928498,0.016301649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013771757,0.0005220016,0.0070561836,0.000056504065,0.000020185666,0.00086525694,0.34043977,0.00019908317,0.00007688807,0.46066645,0.18841511,0.00030538646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01713345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33724445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4782531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045347842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002154176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98941153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124870402","doi":"","title":"The Deformation of Contract in the Information Society","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; State (computer science); Social contract; Law and economics; Contract management; Contract theory; Business; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Marketing; Politics","score_opus":0.02603779739467411,"score_gpt":0.33891125789828164,"score_spread":0.31287346050360754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124870402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23587427,0.0000111602585,0.0006448559,0.041060627,0.00005947467,0.00037995682,0.0000027779738,0.000011910704,0.72195494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994998,0.00006313901,0.00004659804,0.00023310541,0.000023054068,0.000012548096,0.0000010348036,3.3190528e-7,0.00012037379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996892,0.0000135558175,0.000097446085,0.000014476252,0.00012447352,0.000060803955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996331,0.00006313598,0.00010844025,0.00015013861,0.00003797806,0.0000072133935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009435158,0.00001531713,0.000020662857,0.000002773776,0.0012468058,0.00020027386,0.0003155107,0.000019163414,0.000009407307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007513978,0.0000072375524,0.000026205182,0.000027695738,0.00012866205,0.00066583516,0.000015397572,0.0000401181,0.000014650661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6075096e-7,0.000005379423,0.0025564795,0.0000010978118,0.0000012861547,3.1214098e-9,0.023240918,0.0000042122597,0.0000045102774,0.95927083,0.0011057648,0.013808636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012666223,0.000004141067,0.26261756,0.0000025045015,0.00000228019,7.787812e-8,0.026742408,0.0012974995,0.000052334148,0.006745899,0.7023786,0.000030074285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005833469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056406036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95252496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013693536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003786423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9589548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124884400","doi":"","title":"To Recognize or Not? Good Faith Under Nigerian Law of Contract","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Good faith; Supreme court; Duty; Jurisdiction; Political science; Faith; Scholarship; Uniform Commercial Code; Meaning (existential); Bad faith; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03565191012799302,"score_gpt":0.3205903600874097,"score_spread":0.2849384499594167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124884400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32306308,0.00003562326,0.0007987701,0.015564215,0.0005232649,0.000914663,0.00013193788,0.00018810508,0.65878034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829501,0.0000096829945,0.0019584238,0.0059472984,0.0007774843,0.00004126939,0.000004277691,0.000017040758,0.008294437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986358,0.00009920117,0.0002777082,0.00028866707,0.00032657228,0.00037203913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883544,0.00014564798,0.00010652639,0.0003540361,0.00020858484,0.00034976105],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005106703,0.000116140116,0.0002072718,0.000023341123,0.0006160449,0.00013561001,0.0004100127,0.00011617366,0.0023692667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015263386,0.00009797002,0.00007347552,0.0003256023,0.0004179061,0.0002631867,0.000074855045,0.00013984724,0.0012895272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000702094,0.00007773298,0.00027562946,0.000005339305,0.000021550544,0.0000012632738,0.0012643303,0.0000024050275,0.0026672687,0.99259675,0.0020657692,0.0009517685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037287106,0.00012501833,0.003348312,0.000029674102,0.00001787431,8.65811e-7,0.0009952021,0.0000043839887,0.004822282,0.004926027,0.98514944,0.00020804584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033387035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19113843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007829939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021330122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124890122","doi":"","title":"The Metamorphosis of Aboriginal Title","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Generative grammar; Law; Colonialism; Subject (documents); Negotiation; Political science; Exclusive right; Economic Justice; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.008431629780228668,"score_gpt":0.3249126960227492,"score_spread":0.31648106624252054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124890122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026492295,0.00004042695,0.00012074957,0.001478376,0.000020872798,0.000016592072,7.385132e-7,0.000006948661,0.9956661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89150316,0.000023719165,0.00025451384,0.000016616244,0.00006235101,0.00000192025,2.05603e-7,6.392213e-7,0.10813688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998904,0.000004017358,0.000022026092,0.000014526003,0.000041412197,0.000027623497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99992985,0.000016559683,0.0000073720657,0.000030613897,0.000010813929,0.000004807651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000058572354,0.0000064828846,0.000010164653,0.000001930961,0.00008714356,0.0000075352154,0.000043471508,0.000005087187,0.0005447082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000019036472,0.0000037928505,0.000009540872,0.00003915618,0.000038377064,0.00000812831,0.0000019525914,0.000007774952,0.00017462438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.21253e-8,0.0000022227389,0.00010413444,7.921766e-8,4.2238761e-7,6.783983e-9,0.000015991454,1.987813e-7,0.000033153483,0.97063327,0.028582284,0.0006281764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048759985,4.4465202e-7,0.0006262597,1.1266969e-7,0.0000010446232,6.9377903e-9,0.000044382607,0.0000029120322,0.00022697562,0.0043337536,0.9947532,0.000006043877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046232915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011328646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96629953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000033616077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019169236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6989065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124976738","doi":"","title":"Private Rights to Common Property: The Evolution of Common Property in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Public property; Private property; Property (philosophy); Supreme court; Property rights; Property law; Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Common law; Intangible property; Political science; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013170492771549754,"score_gpt":0.26211475264800843,"score_spread":0.24894425987645868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124976738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97739834,0.00063237676,0.00020416215,0.010796387,0.0001222036,0.00045745863,0.0000030015915,0.000007805201,0.010378265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788696,0.00011727457,0.000017109478,0.00010584092,0.0002028176,0.000017523162,7.153228e-7,0.000006172031,0.001645595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779105,0.00021774806,0.00024809502,0.0000817136,0.00034646594,0.0013149048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995259,0.00003636169,0.000118137395,0.0001519173,0.000053317894,0.00011437649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018453414,0.000074978285,0.00012665403,0.00003616017,0.00056659733,0.000024648327,0.00043188746,0.000033415407,0.000016125745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003055082,0.000034245928,0.000034252844,0.00033159374,0.000060924467,0.00018779431,0.00004616369,0.0007346758,0.0000092988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030684314,0.00014809877,0.11839653,0.000004198663,0.00003186767,4.9539386e-7,0.003301019,0.00009907883,0.00031792145,0.8650251,0.00073460065,0.011910398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056997256,0.00017214972,0.07695352,0.00007144603,0.000041182742,0.00004116479,0.019735241,0.00018483381,0.00037573403,0.13101633,0.77044785,0.00039054267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98000515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7697133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056455554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006260992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125018436","doi":"","title":"What Right Does Unjust Enrichment Law Protect","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Plaintiff; Law; Restitution; Economic Justice; Agency (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013548552321564131,"score_gpt":0.2839669928309641,"score_spread":0.27041844050939995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125018436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6111735,0.011333903,0.0090501,0.09248819,0.0024880143,0.0023196496,0.000008193712,0.00043087004,0.27070758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669886,0.016471509,0.000066249304,0.0002685324,0.0007923459,0.000027599826,0.0000010334294,0.0000102398335,0.015373869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755174,0.00011495497,0.00019079605,0.00016334112,0.0003946954,0.0015844592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995087,0.000032079082,0.00010873103,0.0001395234,0.0000807228,0.00013023888],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011940405,0.00009760718,0.000109218796,0.00003593485,0.0021511156,0.00018063442,0.00035203973,0.000066714434,0.00017275204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020743273,0.00006707088,0.00009722836,0.00019457881,0.00022460992,0.000803962,0.000029935773,0.0010053316,0.00011266973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054689226,0.000052501546,0.0001094467,9.575679e-7,0.000027763343,0.0000034985887,0.0016903066,0.0000043898194,0.00008786111,0.99575454,0.00011610311,0.0021471516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024235905,0.00007028192,0.000101392165,0.00001097943,0.000013600687,0.000083832005,0.0069667394,0.000004193346,0.00022038729,0.4083182,0.58381903,0.00014902854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016887168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5874364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009346771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019709738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125060229","doi":"10.1017/s1352325214000056","title":"PROPERTY AND THE RULE OF LAW","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Political science; Public law; Rule of law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Property law; Framing (construction); Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Due process; Municipal law; Property rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.013893984298456936,"score_gpt":0.27545334109655345,"score_spread":0.2615593567980965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125060229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014888025,0.00006975785,0.0003972037,0.0069730305,0.00003209444,0.00012881517,0.0000013124601,0.000018260385,0.9774915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98977673,0.000013298274,0.00008269444,0.00075178867,0.00009899754,0.000011075772,2.1273536e-7,0.0000024305239,0.009262766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953955,0.00018848838,0.000060731134,0.000057690322,0.000080617065,0.00007294432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963295,0.0001875486,0.000027265723,0.00010702709,0.000020563019,0.000024613837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011045154,0.000026015274,0.00005551221,0.000004058014,0.0002691776,0.000029759001,0.00012564284,0.00001995484,0.000047028334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008669217,0.00001201785,0.000022012553,0.00003661554,0.000856163,0.00006186341,0.00003246747,0.000048595997,0.000014393241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011576954,0.0000066277576,0.000015592424,0.0000018931074,0.0000023762243,2.156394e-8,0.0029801636,5.5167794e-7,0.00005384933,0.99208903,0.00004708769,0.004791241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013587193,0.0000039627494,0.00009167572,0.0000027709398,0.00000416565,1.2572718e-7,0.00025235824,0.000021943575,0.00013190052,0.26339468,0.7359387,0.000021818541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003283076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026830574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9748887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004046161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001663555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49630505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125158058","doi":"","title":"The Jewel in the Crown: Can India's Strict Liability Doctrine Deepen Our Understanding of Tort Law Theory?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Doctrine; Delict; Political science; Comparative law; Common law; Law and economics; Economics; Private law; Liability; Black letter law","score_opus":0.03562972347343557,"score_gpt":0.338262468612022,"score_spread":0.30263274513858646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125158058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68725944,0.0012129537,0.0023922734,0.08920529,0.00043337813,0.0011851629,0.000016200038,0.000031403633,0.2182639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785244,0.0012072573,0.000006756823,0.00007373637,0.00026135534,0.000009782686,4.285988e-7,0.0000054834536,0.0005827614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977396,0.00044387722,0.00024518432,0.00012172252,0.0003729798,0.0010766088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988944,0.00030056247,0.00030221132,0.00039410798,0.000055384713,0.000053334566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011798821,0.00008087911,0.00011423031,0.000024199964,0.003684092,0.00036676397,0.0013358833,0.0000549129,0.000007001819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004223529,0.00004646359,0.00009164261,0.00013046048,0.00031525097,0.00020715111,0.00006972601,0.001055994,0.0000022230272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021566779,0.0000297296,0.0060884296,9.786963e-7,0.000021264477,6.2825325e-7,0.0016935297,0.0000038244957,0.000008229832,0.9902272,0.000023067483,0.0018815583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025629578,0.00005091568,0.018581621,0.0000067813176,0.000017072804,0.000007497593,0.048810113,0.000004482239,0.000017172733,0.918369,0.013804346,0.0000746886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007838911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1836974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31059298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011254909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017738503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125188947","doi":"","title":"Two Models of General Jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Variety (cybernetics); Scholarship; Contrast (vision); Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01610711371855004,"score_gpt":0.30806680983406975,"score_spread":0.2919596961155197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125188947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8719099,0.0012605869,0.024829999,0.0056159245,0.00010750932,0.00024901095,0.0000017242912,0.000032783733,0.09599254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99110216,0.00202004,0.0005159139,0.00006712692,0.00032761082,0.000009821613,3.5644274e-7,0.000006064948,0.005950899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835795,0.000060980343,0.00017420831,0.00008805759,0.0002571501,0.0010616371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995521,0.000023019213,0.00010889405,0.000099849254,0.00013204303,0.00008414649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008519995,0.000054264685,0.00008498516,0.00003403632,0.00032982332,0.00005414519,0.0003352927,0.000033793636,0.00011679408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001983427,0.00004698973,0.00006674528,0.00014963502,0.00009845101,0.00037429374,0.000025417965,0.000530758,0.0000566494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001088229,0.000020253055,0.00020669843,5.067212e-7,0.000012590414,7.5630346e-8,0.0005266132,0.00022831366,0.00058907975,0.9915577,0.0001445306,0.006712513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015757306,0.00003137141,0.00022368834,0.000003880448,0.000008170276,0.000008413748,0.002083545,0.0008358097,0.00010764809,0.9907233,0.0057411757,0.00007543801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008554832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004106324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11919225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028618117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017482896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125227557","doi":"","title":"The Patriation of Canadian Corporate Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Political science; Statute; Appeal; Corporate law; Legislation; English law; Comparative law; Lawmaking; Statutory law; Legislature; Corporate governance; Business","score_opus":0.032269273149962245,"score_gpt":0.2369507830417258,"score_spread":0.20468150989176354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125227557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078583315,6.0584665e-7,0.000019364275,0.001272246,0.000103042956,0.00042986977,0.000026576545,0.00002896815,0.919536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862335,0.013182801,0.00007167516,0.00006344389,0.00004345868,9.409996e-7,0.000006210642,0.0000049122164,0.00039306562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935424,0.00009500707,0.000079018566,0.00012381778,0.00014390764,0.00020397753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939436,0.0000803702,0.00012815761,0.00019722994,0.00012232918,0.000077558885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002514784,0.00005348602,0.000070045586,0.0017961718,0.0005784805,0.00004216115,0.00032125812,0.000056947512,0.000033252534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022569191,0.000047349415,0.000050120227,0.0055672433,0.00012974368,0.0001915863,0.00003631731,0.00007795569,0.000062409716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009375258,0.000012420332,0.0012080731,0.000003391507,0.000012243538,0.0000016933783,0.0051243426,0.000010067834,0.0000069688026,0.9909865,0.00013382647,0.0024910497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015343881,0.000015619875,0.00027246244,0.00000424264,0.000011045934,9.326427e-8,0.002205818,0.00003455908,0.000056414996,0.000025630216,0.99715745,0.00006322011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98569566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99702364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018141564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009859187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44492623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125288761","doi":"","title":"Assumed Jurisdiction in Canada: Identifying and Interpreting Presumptive Connecting Factors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tort; Cause of action; Fiduciary; Statutory law; Law; Duty; Misrepresentation; Common law; Plaintiff; Exclusive jurisdiction; Political science; Action (physics); Business; Liability","score_opus":0.017486984102103365,"score_gpt":0.2993349664142414,"score_spread":0.28184798231213803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125288761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99312353,0.0002576664,0.0019586487,0.0007179595,0.00016351983,0.00008853384,0.0000011473561,0.000013554208,0.0036754205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991915,0.0003711164,0.000027997843,0.000030074409,0.00022551861,0.0000022524928,5.441575e-7,0.00000665471,0.00014430226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984561,0.000108571665,0.00017714649,0.00012709587,0.00018059197,0.0009504885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960095,0.00010268227,0.00012200983,0.00004555985,0.00005927306,0.000069524125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012822578,0.00006276099,0.000083175604,0.000052201853,0.00078265753,0.00008460783,0.00012951111,0.00003423811,0.00002197331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019411581,0.00005994258,0.000019973726,0.00014776636,0.00005800253,0.00023184702,0.000033234013,0.00073378475,0.0000020234083],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004446057,0.000038332986,0.44014233,0.000008241982,0.00013650738,0.0000036263662,0.06916866,0.000022305923,0.0011058768,0.4148755,0.00010366186,0.07435049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012628217,0.00022313769,0.17501731,0.00024490742,0.00007212403,0.00007480917,0.6003865,0.0015431944,0.0011081354,0.18104327,0.038249288,0.0007744975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8523627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5312179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028106775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038626231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73498243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125321180","doi":"","title":"Reconciling with the Past: John Willis and the Question of Judicial Review in Interwar and Postwar England","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Elite; Honour; Honor; Sociology","score_opus":0.01813907832416017,"score_gpt":0.26120975325361995,"score_spread":0.24307067492945977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125321180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7178134,0.0006079247,0.00027778244,0.012848393,0.00006769187,0.0017491863,0.000017876033,0.000044891472,0.2665729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76817584,0.2315227,0.00007075227,0.00014168344,0.00007133125,0.0000028644308,0.0000011459044,0.0000033194874,0.000010378009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992362,0.00029828798,0.000088734436,0.00011073373,0.00011547883,0.00015055334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994967,0.00020158154,0.00009303491,0.00011248695,0.000059133436,0.00003707487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009292462,0.00006796158,0.00013300247,0.00038717405,0.0002543263,0.000019448495,0.0001463814,0.000035854937,0.000004553946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007612346,0.000040715295,0.00002390364,0.0015439388,0.0003982578,0.00026010346,0.000075295444,0.00012712339,7.315096e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007372114,0.00027835564,0.096038975,0.00060201174,0.00015409528,0.000011657784,0.35487598,0.0000071388563,0.00001167526,0.40215966,0.0004550824,0.14466815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005728525,0.000024673853,0.0019467033,0.00019258706,0.00006018901,0.000002104826,0.0024192843,0.000012443082,0.0000068111267,0.0000042662136,0.9946927,0.00006538894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11244934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07785367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004893415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102558646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93897307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125508104","doi":"","title":"Developments in Administrative Law: The 2014-2015 Term","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Tribunal; Presumption; Discretion; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Judicial review; Legislature; Legislative history; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Legislative intent; Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.025440308500671294,"score_gpt":0.34733128414553627,"score_spread":0.32189097564486496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125508104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4449737,0.0022141982,0.004519421,0.13702327,0.00052548735,0.00096042175,0.000014248541,0.000089884124,0.40967938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911227,0.0017059571,0.00003459928,0.00016168391,0.00019064809,0.000013796665,2.906112e-7,0.000005145388,0.0067651267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983283,0.00011784525,0.0001575884,0.000101569625,0.00021593239,0.0010787279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996389,0.00008149181,0.000085689855,0.000085756845,0.00004583278,0.00006231353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016775245,0.00006172334,0.00006406217,0.000022451159,0.0005583802,0.00006126188,0.00035841158,0.000040673596,0.000049788763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004663334,0.000032466123,0.00003507373,0.00010428533,0.0001626402,0.00018661493,0.000026116768,0.00046403942,0.00013174755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000554333,0.000020095553,0.0026218726,1.7359562e-7,0.00001226874,6.224491e-7,0.0011383488,1.1086447e-7,0.00010177204,0.9851131,0.00022822106,0.010757886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005664639,0.00006535023,0.009729357,0.000023144969,0.000007914895,0.000025675794,0.0066475845,4.5338376e-7,0.00013464573,0.45650265,0.52613086,0.00016592916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007168274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06663769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5461491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082339696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032738545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95039374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125564929","doi":"","title":"A Rational Approach to Cabinet Immunity Under the Common Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Impartiality; Law; Political science; Public interest; Judicial review; Standard of review; Law and economics; Doctrine; Discretion; Common law; Cabinet (room); Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.033681656850413855,"score_gpt":0.3315073318909187,"score_spread":0.29782567504050483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125564929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27117512,0.00040545056,0.01457879,0.114676274,0.00022741192,0.0005490153,0.000008484877,0.000045166726,0.59833425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945527,0.0001720286,0.000084423606,0.000636629,0.00048721707,0.000017029819,0.0000023591986,0.0000064076594,0.004041221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984755,0.00013772606,0.00012380595,0.00009196617,0.0002747301,0.0008962952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993661,0.000046534744,0.00011422446,0.00031730457,0.00007030846,0.000085538944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022813978,0.00006386003,0.00007520222,0.00001416828,0.006315548,0.00045476758,0.0009459252,0.000042109747,0.000020953474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037222148,0.000044297893,0.00006139053,0.000059407936,0.00023481341,0.00021499264,0.0000850945,0.0009966693,0.000042538068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048154143,0.00003959512,0.00014827476,2.72891e-7,0.000020087135,5.405659e-8,0.0007683627,0.00007889012,0.000027735092,0.9976473,0.0002270659,0.0010375613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023213211,0.000038217386,0.005977825,0.0000032698003,0.000017280743,0.000022994263,0.011195468,0.00007438954,0.000011948969,0.79093856,0.19136511,0.00012280015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010921506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06642734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7233776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044351706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001334226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99566483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125627900","doi":"","title":"The Lawyer as Fiduciary: Defining Private Law Duties in Public Law Relations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty of loyalty; Duty; Law; Obligation; Discretion; Trust law; Normative; Political science; Private law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.04887154238550128,"score_gpt":0.27458242721129483,"score_spread":0.22571088482579355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125627900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02065915,0.000005040561,0.000043946457,0.00708856,0.000109894376,0.00038899903,0.000011988954,0.00015194167,0.97154045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940269,0.004652087,0.00032078393,0.00031352148,0.000071577655,0.000008575343,0.000012053909,0.00001304464,0.0005814776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859256,0.00027284067,0.00015045695,0.00025771355,0.00030654026,0.00041988184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990571,0.00023202419,0.0000945537,0.00031165493,0.00016568793,0.00013895764],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006764721,0.0001166876,0.00011819057,0.0009808583,0.0015920185,0.00025287434,0.0005796975,0.00011152719,0.000026020853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022005774,0.00010640923,0.000059789898,0.005189802,0.0005012602,0.0008255974,0.00022768603,0.0002639616,0.0001797391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010950649,0.00004790249,0.00077716203,0.0000013924935,0.000012480296,0.000008915711,0.013174485,0.000015753754,3.1645092e-7,0.9849444,0.00027499205,0.0007312349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003378639,0.00002090735,0.000079386016,0.000009976948,0.000013666499,8.334714e-7,0.007369441,0.000037725695,0.000009663014,0.0010342487,0.99094164,0.00014464013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4081859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61273664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041461465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009863288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125644741","doi":"","title":"Choice-of-Law Rules for Secured Transactions: An Interest-Based and Modern Principles-Based Framework for Assessment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Security interest; Law; Municipal law; Uniform Commercial Code; Comparative law; Normative; Doctrine; Political science; Law and economics; Common law; Law reform; Public law; Choice of law; Sociology; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.10926816103630789,"score_gpt":0.4000314781151167,"score_spread":0.2907633170788088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125644741","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10070794,0.0002207457,0.8831268,0.007457202,0.00032516907,0.0026517469,0.0007835865,0.00015440372,0.0045724153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90838814,0.0000107458245,0.08959571,0.00074219384,0.00025423567,0.00071630336,0.00003975023,0.000026788646,0.00022615424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865836,0.00007132495,0.0003083073,0.00039443673,0.00022116303,0.0003464108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980939,0.00050905667,0.00027831167,0.0006562811,0.0001859408,0.00027651162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057198264,0.00016488718,0.00025388232,0.000031407566,0.002276924,0.0004650461,0.0005805417,0.00019693778,0.00008355334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002144503,0.00016274744,0.00015838223,0.00003848123,0.0004921746,0.00045636276,0.000020137002,0.00020618562,0.0000031581405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054165084,0.00020312848,0.00040361198,0.00008475194,0.000026545087,2.0100667e-7,0.00029444727,0.0003108673,0.0002639631,0.99572563,0.000038672628,0.002594004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025583997,0.00036814954,0.0037441868,0.00024551587,0.0001483347,1.8736253e-7,0.00036382728,0.042874932,0.0029365125,0.18022197,0.7659686,0.00056932896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040641357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025843734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81550366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009307811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032354798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125749829","doi":"10.5235/096157612800081222","title":"Libertarian Paternalism and the Dangers of Nudging Consumers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"King s Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Libertarianism; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021568263122398686,"score_gpt":0.2970277557268479,"score_spread":0.27545949260444924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125749829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7905915,0.0012350663,0.0004734542,0.01316856,0.0005337087,0.0001456856,0.0000029560795,0.000018170414,0.1938309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895364,0.00008017223,0.00027408433,0.00027221764,0.00026349508,0.00000146867,1.3366355e-7,0.0000033567312,0.00015140636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994463,0.000098951095,0.00011348463,0.00003367501,0.00014607083,0.00016155343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996102,0.00011549697,0.00010735573,0.000051753967,0.000027686207,0.000087508204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010505588,0.000033040422,0.000064746906,0.000011226558,0.0008395935,0.00008694462,0.000117676034,0.000022579146,0.00004928177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038567498,0.000021217918,0.00003580544,0.000048383874,0.0004103327,0.00017234306,0.000022058475,0.0001304233,0.0000026190844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049254922,0.0000074490827,0.00949008,0.0000017280689,0.000013874013,3.7685092e-7,0.020740416,0.0000014577989,0.000077001125,0.9664942,0.000060962582,0.0031075012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010264417,0.00000699797,0.011841459,0.00004972032,0.00007838264,0.000047389534,0.008990986,0.0000435201,0.00027727618,0.022966763,0.9545278,0.00014328372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013357476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014150187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017278868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020467656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99321264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125752786","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.229","title":"Corrective Justice and Unjust Enrichment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Private law; Economic Justice; Tort; Law; Duty; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Public law; Restitution; Liability","score_opus":0.01763466405302733,"score_gpt":0.27011748703015,"score_spread":0.25248282297712266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125752786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054830313,0.001121465,0.0017056318,0.0008418961,0.00037258194,0.00008131866,0.000006579898,0.000013691005,0.9410265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697775,0.00059560844,0.0007750092,0.00003841844,0.00018674371,2.1970317e-8,2.3738131e-7,0.000001303339,0.0014249046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996206,0.00004831828,0.000041365296,0.000040950308,0.00012059433,0.00012816474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963087,0.000037997386,0.00006453392,0.000038888935,0.00006631505,0.00016140335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024105779,0.0000300183,0.000053164385,0.000004856451,0.0009829703,0.000015267462,0.000099706114,0.00002799797,0.00057966233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010370704,0.000032175118,0.000026052658,0.000015401207,0.00016059449,0.0005884236,0.00003511753,0.000060543898,0.0000060907687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016459182,0.00008648548,0.0016319548,0.000004943862,0.000024062258,0.0000014574413,0.042845614,0.000003003039,0.000058201393,0.9485249,0.0022156618,0.0045872703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021529505,0.000024646812,0.011087842,0.000007365134,0.000105281906,0.0000055670394,0.09071607,0.0000074461877,0.000011185901,0.00030336482,0.8974518,0.00006410703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07064777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059177373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9482215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021391867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032610405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95799017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125754435","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.4.481","title":"AN OBJECT LESSON IN SPECULATION: MULTIPLE VIEWS OF THE CATHEDRAL IN <i>LEAF V. INTERNATIONAL GALLERIES</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Painting; Law; Doctrine; Appeal; Damages; Speculation; Rescission; Verisimilitude; Art; Art history; Political science; Literature; Economics","score_opus":0.03133497533826046,"score_gpt":0.2749085395805675,"score_spread":0.24357356424230703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125754435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.877229,0.000075394935,0.00014404861,0.0012041259,0.00012860695,0.00010918251,0.000008839682,0.0000042649103,0.12109658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884975,0.00022946045,0.00051244214,0.000024391546,0.000061351646,6.989453e-8,0.0000010405734,0.0000017488331,0.0003197598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939257,0.000106088024,0.00012764709,0.0000679177,0.00021666526,0.00008911848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996332,0.00002321976,0.00013676487,0.000092241025,0.00007351689,0.000041059102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002480672,0.00003742201,0.0000868112,0.0000149728285,0.0003390506,0.000008302347,0.00039434794,0.000037866914,0.00031629708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016200387,0.000034870285,0.00006159036,0.000052590833,0.00022781859,0.00043761462,0.000038531653,0.000096293006,9.244777e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019520507,0.00080776744,0.49976122,0.000008236912,0.00003616949,0.000033318673,0.223004,0.0027723643,0.0021262344,0.26754948,0.00084441295,0.002861592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012014023,0.000036440695,0.57783884,0.0000441825,0.000006991179,0.000009958493,0.0253405,0.0005268721,0.00015390715,0.0005245654,0.39419916,0.00011718678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19556947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7996242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60405475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002963618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010511034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80978733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125768953","doi":"10.29173/alr237","title":"Which &lt;i&gt;Kraft&lt;/i&gt; of Statutory Interpretation? A Supreme Court of Canada Trilogy on Intellectual Property Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Statute; Law; Statutory law; Supreme court; Trilogy; Legislative intent; Legislature; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Legislation; Judicial interpretation; Discretion; Intellectual property; Normative; Common law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.025360761903392214,"score_gpt":0.2784343435409271,"score_spread":0.2530735816375349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125768953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014056732,0.012989577,0.000051015773,0.01112766,0.00023399899,0.0017043179,0.000059293492,0.000028374858,0.95974904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98195577,0.008875945,0.000073727315,0.0021241845,0.00005303306,0.000081330225,0.000019273324,0.000016716493,0.0068000527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997994,0.00030971243,0.000626743,0.00028314107,0.0004791093,0.00030730182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792504,0.00086456124,0.00026263628,0.00041110464,0.00038597838,0.00015065675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048429013,0.00015990825,0.00052071083,0.000022731787,0.0003387564,0.000010047696,0.00044595328,0.00007257806,0.00068781024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008176182,0.000116665,0.00011467644,0.00044060734,0.00048332458,0.00012901382,0.000061672654,0.00014232537,0.000039864117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021965196,0.00013935316,0.000023296661,0.00046355338,0.00005725978,0.000001175283,0.0037109433,0.000010257507,0.00026742156,0.95810753,0.036269072,0.00092819135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013551832,0.0000926063,0.000048487425,0.0006541216,0.000049380807,0.000002847122,0.000033162232,0.000038622475,0.00016989296,0.00015370871,0.9984748,0.00014690011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5880483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9747014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016234773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015545452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.753104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125806982","doi":"10.2202/1565-3404.1000","title":"Restitutionary Damages as Corrective Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Restitution; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Tort; Political science; Sociology; Liability; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029359555964043813,"score_gpt":0.3850370660161229,"score_spread":0.3556775100520791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125806982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044311494,0.00006474841,0.01670347,0.009292071,0.0003292173,0.00020792727,0.0000057403313,0.00010548468,0.9289799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965164,0.00012349056,0.00029413262,0.0013210292,0.00033905738,0.000033432956,0.000004256206,0.0000067165347,0.001361488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897707,0.0001763556,0.00015103984,0.00018738324,0.00022693831,0.00028122426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990987,0.00050976407,0.00002611887,0.00018588694,0.00006994436,0.00010955294],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050706364,0.00007724884,0.00010290236,0.000026970325,0.000550747,0.000064215485,0.00027189436,0.00009314171,0.0012013728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063789566,0.000071187074,0.000030465117,0.00031760006,0.06060011,0.00019436164,0.00009282873,0.00018895172,0.00031983983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003261255,0.000061656094,0.00018629624,0.0000025874306,0.0000026367475,0.000016259983,0.0036301364,0.000019843525,0.000014668639,0.9951944,0.00042499404,0.00041396255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009764964,0.000024840294,0.00011447687,0.000014684164,0.000013192366,0.000004159591,0.0048703686,0.000054006985,0.00005580415,0.80507267,0.1895796,0.00009852877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028738106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014357407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000914746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103835264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125813465","doi":"","title":"Understanding Fiduciary Duties and Relationship Fiduciarity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Jurisprudence; Law; Foundation (evidence); Scholarship; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Duty","score_opus":0.15787420990941067,"score_gpt":0.3585188649309531,"score_spread":0.2006446550215424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125813465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56053114,0.002905559,0.027648184,0.08072777,0.00059014605,0.00040465718,0.00000788375,0.00011861891,0.327066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929978,0.0023758227,0.000060469865,0.000042134816,0.0003861243,0.0000025907843,5.578401e-7,0.000006063545,0.0041284175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984792,0.00007550658,0.000118923694,0.00011659757,0.0001865323,0.0010232363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945736,0.000093253555,0.00015075522,0.0001715307,0.000035258152,0.000091850954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025476594,0.00006094694,0.000075253956,0.000036978316,0.0066309236,0.0004553068,0.0002933319,0.000067972964,0.000026169899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044427003,0.000058141366,0.00004111995,0.0000425522,0.00027694568,0.00048433116,0.000051495954,0.00093536,0.000011532534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028910413,0.000007963805,0.035772674,9.148923e-7,0.000012303219,3.943389e-7,0.0010856866,0.0000011295679,0.0000034439563,0.96218807,0.00009717964,0.0008273289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013724291,0.000016062468,0.025069749,0.0000075701428,0.000013763117,0.000014536765,0.009190281,0.000014090253,0.000001966703,0.9523982,0.013056181,0.00008036488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013755081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027078962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43246666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008934145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014771926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125842437","doi":"10.7202/1025139ar","title":"Property in Licences and the Law of Things","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Property (philosophy); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Property law; Tangible property; Law; Government (linguistics); Bundle of rights; Public property; Numerus clausus; Right to property; Intangible property; Reservation of rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Business; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01975974329420483,"score_gpt":0.274742387572499,"score_spread":0.2549826442782942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125842437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009752969,0.00004818097,0.000025476353,0.012191919,0.000042736032,0.00008806366,9.1355594e-7,0.0000057655348,0.977844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987892,0.000083414874,0.00022061255,0.0006136704,0.00007366208,0.0000030878484,5.161456e-8,0.0000019100803,0.00021440865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994051,0.0001433667,0.00013149715,0.000052010764,0.00014997191,0.000118052296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967855,0.00010173574,0.00007601741,0.000053206317,0.000039891616,0.00005062194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015775933,0.0000305351,0.00007605083,0.000008161371,0.0017110021,0.000050679464,0.00016403335,0.00002365308,0.000031339143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063369094,0.000014035604,0.000024569976,0.00006748479,0.0005234175,0.00018815437,0.000027876838,0.00013332232,0.000003238534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005215094,0.000010168716,0.0001718412,0.0000013799415,0.0000018729293,1.5914844e-7,0.0019060612,0.0000017924374,0.000012748765,0.9953514,0.000014060481,0.0025233433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003065871,0.000011620374,0.00028720906,0.000017092834,0.0000039822226,0.0000036801312,0.0010356117,0.00008765071,0.000071407136,0.024658773,0.97348285,0.000033519074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037889153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049785484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001371394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006123397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125877897","doi":"","title":"A common law of tort: Is there a European rift in the common law family?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Tort; Political science; Private law; Public law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Scots law; Civil law (Civil law); Human rights; Sources of law; Liability","score_opus":0.09375273478024733,"score_gpt":0.35382517886815446,"score_spread":0.26007244408790714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125877897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49053413,0.00020027162,0.00007290617,0.0123796,0.000015547235,0.00035986665,0.00008891391,0.000019797866,0.49632898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960308,0.00021210742,0.000071840936,0.00014897759,0.000031693602,9.122354e-7,0.0000030243843,0.000009070073,0.0034915379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997126,0.001268309,0.00017014764,0.00024021581,0.0008363894,0.00035893582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985575,0.000436323,0.00012596457,0.0005352304,0.00022967428,0.000115273484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027548054,0.000080643986,0.00021219131,0.000091104965,0.0008970422,0.00003434837,0.0014940649,0.000072011026,0.00011480998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035184443,0.00006711064,0.00011110003,0.0005820102,0.0025384638,0.0002535234,0.00030492115,0.00027421952,0.000111212714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008836181,0.00038350446,0.0047643604,0.000038691156,0.000025103845,0.00006761504,0.026193155,7.752054e-7,0.001227945,0.9228872,0.032188542,0.0121347075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005047859,0.00008699622,0.023152547,0.000090398506,0.000009436993,9.708748e-7,0.028203472,0.000010608844,0.000054351334,0.0070857066,0.94068664,0.000114095456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16599965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15895708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9158015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016120555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014765207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9353075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125891625","doi":"","title":"The Law and Politics of Unjust Enrichment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Politics; Mainstream; Legal realism; Private law; Realism; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019820473967449324,"score_gpt":0.2523517861399893,"score_spread":0.23253131217254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125891625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05183467,0.000002466548,0.00006890602,0.0021003205,0.000036872367,0.0003916319,0.000008789135,0.00003519954,0.9455211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737661,0.025479022,0.00018810094,0.00012653328,0.00005700374,0.0000028108132,0.0000011968864,0.0000043017167,0.00037496028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993959,0.00006956576,0.00007629993,0.00011674017,0.00013850699,0.00020298321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948937,0.00012380563,0.000057400193,0.0001608528,0.00010183637,0.00006672551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011848497,0.000058142232,0.000068569454,0.00042114715,0.0008205538,0.00005957362,0.00024327505,0.000042026353,0.000020672962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022243865,0.000047274396,0.000033866178,0.0014119194,0.00040143466,0.00023000357,0.00010888849,0.00006985353,0.000014329422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016514828,0.000030353629,0.00015682931,0.000004709217,0.000011889011,6.969556e-7,0.006357988,5.710871e-7,0.000005419532,0.9908706,0.0001666154,0.0023926625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223094,0.000018266794,0.00015957303,0.000004100985,0.000015546606,2.112055e-7,0.0056191394,0.00001814339,0.000058906462,0.00008883217,0.99383444,0.00006051718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43803257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046611544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99366784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007985411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017710464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9707853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126032045","doi":"10.21991/c95q3w","title":"Nonpartisanship of Agents of Parliament: Bill C-520’s Redundant and Likely Unconstitutional Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Charter; Constitutionality; Bill of rights; Politics; Law; Political science; Public sector; Impartiality; Ambiguity; Public service; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Constitution","score_opus":0.03383397789530636,"score_gpt":0.2913964090708161,"score_spread":0.25756243117550975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126032045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08956221,0.0012555901,0.34704754,0.012941282,0.0015691428,0.002201176,0.0013363082,0.00026402427,0.5438227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409646,0.00011936397,0.0048318445,0.00033083762,0.0001363268,0.0000875506,0.00009837367,0.000008291446,0.00029096656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971157,0.00016537153,0.00083618134,0.0005156386,0.0007625851,0.00060457084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981324,0.0002814339,0.0004235704,0.00037153903,0.00045814007,0.0003328886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093952066,0.0002743279,0.0004668635,0.00022169776,0.0014248139,0.00006041201,0.000425938,0.00022474004,0.00015740938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006133366,0.00024115421,0.00020815906,0.00044373452,0.018930674,0.0005174128,0.00018554942,0.00022656395,0.000031812182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035037418,0.0002509563,0.022790436,0.000047352332,0.00006525651,9.617453e-7,0.0004573748,0.000886024,0.00030471312,0.97288245,0.0013809066,0.0008985397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028970211,0.000159169,0.0058730436,0.0003792245,0.0002112719,0.00008304787,0.0063039963,0.003856694,0.0012370166,0.15134178,0.8267253,0.0009324183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012270618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002512711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9045342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015205824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017955516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126056798","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.512","title":"On the Contrary: Inferential Analysis and Ontological Assumptions of the A Contrario Argument","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stateless protocol; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Sentence; State (computer science); Position (finance); Subject (documents); Point (geometry); Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.048102974027944195,"score_gpt":0.29248937480366005,"score_spread":0.24438640077571586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126056798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90653276,0.000022151184,0.00080502237,0.0047540944,0.0000363534,0.00026935615,0.00001772104,0.000018380204,0.08754415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986708,0.00005259983,0.000033290158,0.00065461075,0.000028596416,0.000025119623,0.000002206908,9.186466e-7,0.000531837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993351,0.00006635238,0.00016840568,0.000069783935,0.000213977,0.00014635065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994602,0.00021343584,0.00009211094,0.00014873645,0.000041283405,0.00004419033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023358958,0.000055133172,0.000112712485,0.000026003216,0.0007815097,0.000031466087,0.00022074663,0.000055524597,0.0002768316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012161683,0.000026156458,0.00010908681,0.0002788179,0.0005255966,0.00008192397,0.000055415956,0.00012440528,0.000012266018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006935213,0.000035990044,0.01578659,5.325583e-7,0.000053822285,2.8520012e-7,0.0018069674,0.00006133695,0.000010449665,0.9818346,0.00012569752,0.0002768253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028706447,0.00006371171,0.9493605,0.000003878234,0.00014573209,0.0000017354481,0.0007741578,0.00058851705,0.000071481925,0.0082531925,0.040346812,0.000103229555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013819252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00226446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016796188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007382628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60108197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126085403","doi":"","title":"The Trials and Tribulations of Ontario's Mining Act: The Duty to Consult and Anishinaabek Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Statutory law; Treaty; Political science; Statutory interpretation","score_opus":0.06101447789159724,"score_gpt":0.3493304062936099,"score_spread":0.28831592840201264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126085403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397976,0.002864576,0.000331374,0.038770456,0.00011371818,0.0004553306,0.0000068248382,0.00001186941,0.017648244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969297,0.00076798623,0.000082205035,0.0001168726,0.00013731718,0.000008105053,4.340196e-7,0.000003630893,0.0019537571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986785,0.00023818987,0.00024442098,0.00007930024,0.00020509388,0.00055451103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989486,0.00056248426,0.00015854985,0.00008953072,0.00012354652,0.00011732056],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008326369,0.000053391082,0.00012945152,0.000010787052,0.0013061572,0.00019334943,0.00018161489,0.00003409378,0.0000051855027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007279444,0.00002966196,0.000033042263,0.00011637909,0.00022746678,0.00011480963,0.00003850537,0.00039773522,0.0000013360785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002068934,0.000008227651,0.00085966726,2.5914133e-7,0.000029285113,7.866931e-8,0.011363067,0.000006836801,0.000030394145,0.9818099,0.00018660564,0.005684949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060545694,0.00013396215,0.0023239334,0.00000818089,0.000058170433,0.000023034141,0.030691389,0.000012548715,0.000025427058,0.23677719,0.7292585,0.00008223802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028691418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60428417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7450327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037215257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003601661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126946898","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3578","title":"Error of Law: An Exception to the Discoverability Principle?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Supreme court; Doctrine; Computer science","score_opus":0.059745247600011896,"score_gpt":0.3816571129524459,"score_spread":0.32191186535243405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126946898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19588232,0.00008041206,0.003418261,0.020519624,0.0003236964,0.00027320097,0.000044752782,0.000029028011,0.7794287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973473,0.000025756288,0.00085283036,0.0005431918,0.0005005669,0.000009168508,0.000004663799,0.000006923752,0.00070961285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866533,0.00031182327,0.00025389862,0.00015822014,0.00039246056,0.00021823857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991084,0.000060868526,0.00011407304,0.00030673965,0.00020850019,0.00020141724],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010731841,0.00006814791,0.00011296272,0.000009353703,0.001323084,0.000196846,0.0003472813,0.000055161338,0.0004543583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086398686,0.000049019498,0.00008709314,0.00013646793,0.00018633301,0.000343314,0.000076775505,0.00024062727,0.000035889152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006534604,0.00011544915,0.00036206288,0.00000281977,0.000007765457,0.0000018605162,0.0028911198,0.00024824997,0.0009635037,0.994207,0.00007198188,0.0011216522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002708705,0.00007791179,0.012644808,0.000028406677,0.000034259996,0.000026325773,0.003428708,0.00005891294,0.0015179489,0.21522287,0.7664971,0.00019193531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033260338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5662014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.801465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088443536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017208738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127244732","doi":"","title":"Decomposing Bhasin V. Hrynew: Toward an Institutional Understanding of the General Organizing Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Fair dealing; Faith; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Good faith; Legislature; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05199432592871547,"score_gpt":0.3393791762831223,"score_spread":0.28738485035440686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127244732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99188185,0.00010481357,0.003200847,0.0010934757,0.00011076189,0.000121869045,0.0000027965964,0.000005672629,0.0034778877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991177,0.0003784887,0.00018809325,0.000016323262,0.00018081839,0.00000142714,6.808887e-7,0.0000065645777,0.00010994253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998505,0.00008169519,0.00027648258,0.00010824284,0.0003118397,0.00071675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992845,0.00002883373,0.0003805314,0.00018114406,0.00007222102,0.000052782885],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016187566,0.00007299053,0.00013406183,0.000046933306,0.0015614919,0.00009483016,0.0006382933,0.000057008296,0.0000105364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113400754,0.00005689435,0.0000563553,0.000115084506,0.00034079168,0.0005524702,0.00006988931,0.0006571682,7.359063e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013961083,0.00005509508,0.069249116,0.0000038217704,0.000017629915,2.4059537e-7,0.0018084927,0.00027884834,0.0021797768,0.92523354,6.7964066e-7,0.0011587661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004040005,0.00047436,0.665953,0.00037822084,0.00010422138,0.00015924351,0.033741143,0.0046592006,0.008051322,0.27320027,0.008521572,0.00071746483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012488797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012392576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65203327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011911214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035287938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128147327","doi":"10.17613/7w0g-4928","title":"The Role of the Digression on the Man of the Law Courts and the Philosopher (172b-177c) in the Argument of Theaetetus","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanities Commons CORE (Modern Language Association / Columbia University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Digression; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.017046056398819853,"score_gpt":0.21929048749327099,"score_spread":0.20224443109445114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128147327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.821061,0.0002900065,0.0000018949269,0.011153489,0.000071509705,0.0006077151,0.000083310544,0.000010025353,0.16672102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99336433,0.00008227418,0.0000017465213,0.00043115718,0.000041463816,0.000007792401,0.0000033507326,0.000006452401,0.0060614576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978476,0.001087953,0.00020017558,0.00012275102,0.00056786917,0.00017362816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971237,0.0016877012,0.00046204904,0.0005428472,0.00016862877,0.000015070171],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090143504,0.0000833783,0.00015421218,0.00001728184,0.002096873,0.00012270732,0.0009432839,0.000067945104,0.0000515784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017918914,0.000043357988,0.00014388117,0.00028373327,0.00087908795,0.000077106495,0.0002994449,0.0002719491,6.5773463e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019014196,0.00009046481,0.0071689705,0.0000049790115,0.000049153976,9.602047e-7,0.06141665,0.000016942317,0.00013155826,0.9302986,0.00035579785,0.00044685515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019449958,0.000065119166,0.09100393,0.00025547543,0.0003215667,0.0000017343398,0.5141338,0.00046408983,0.0009743157,0.14000218,0.25052983,0.00030297297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013326002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2161949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7902965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016970484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012219367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130161451","doi":"","title":"Library Guides: Canadian Law: Newfoundland & Labrador","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.032429410616331554,"score_gpt":0.2908973925404317,"score_spread":0.25846798192410014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130161451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014608471,0.00045308901,0.000009030278,0.10435201,0.00049855735,0.00035875425,0.00052562356,0.00029276797,0.89349556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010844635,0.0015271744,0.0018113388,0.046848763,0.0066768634,0.00006600512,0.0009015713,0.00008729693,0.9312363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998436,0.00007629016,0.00027572122,0.00038955273,0.00032361492,0.00049883727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985711,0.000107719294,0.00008898704,0.00030805505,0.00004417936,0.00087993767],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012433284,0.00019955174,0.00025982797,0.00007649572,0.00094012043,0.00067182386,0.00090584427,0.0003847088,0.009284549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007046812,0.00018645904,0.00012762907,0.00035405904,0.00024913135,0.0003818354,0.00011041068,0.00036554746,0.0015327261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.846504e-7,0.0000030060917,0.000059227437,0.000008615534,0.000010734463,0.000006504453,0.0005745434,2.4232065e-7,1.625858e-7,0.4601051,0.53858215,0.00064933806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051967647,0.000008163936,0.000056937733,0.000022110415,0.000019747416,3.9053182e-7,0.00056397537,0.0000050366693,0.0000012210763,0.006134368,0.9928818,0.00025428407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45429966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018674904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035687506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130340362","doi":"","title":"Revisiting Auditors Liability for their reports in light of Jetiva and Livent","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Liability; Tort; Accounting; Statutory law; Business; Shareholder; Materiality (auditing); Duty; Law; Meaning (existential); Pleading; Auditor's report; Legal liability; Political science; Finance; Psychology; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.012159173167506986,"score_gpt":0.24221244390904545,"score_spread":0.23005327074153847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130340362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97617936,0.000142863,0.0007633391,0.0049726465,0.0002665048,0.000776993,0.000020877178,0.00003799173,0.016839433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541557,0.00007671259,0.0012984764,0.000007868177,0.0002731952,0.0000032650796,7.7471924e-7,0.000005881407,0.0029182874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988689,0.0001497569,0.00031101008,0.0003042361,0.00018498664,0.00018114656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984037,0.00053129985,0.00045844438,0.00027484415,0.00022476328,0.00010689747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009557993,0.00008746834,0.00026317334,0.000063448664,0.0003978473,0.0000117083555,0.00019325841,0.00012986516,0.000016701528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023259524,0.000079539284,0.00012208894,0.00019935687,0.00033830284,0.00022185197,0.000119596465,0.000069257796,8.6118007e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006338961,0.001230755,0.6685909,0.0012453634,0.00022295432,0.00016222634,0.08222412,0.000055878718,0.07930542,0.09764023,0.001782799,0.06690547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014787449,0.0002699048,0.13169338,0.0010193192,0.00010325211,0.000010808607,0.025870573,0.00015933932,0.009161152,0.0075047123,0.8221833,0.0005454834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015080655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058757083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82040054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017227734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023310095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3243518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131619608","doi":"10.1558/ijsll.19198","title":"Strategic Indeterminacy in the Law by David Lanius (2019)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Speech Language and the Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.015730744629071435,"score_gpt":0.3255214376980365,"score_spread":0.30979069306896506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131619608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68178695,0.0018651239,0.000028483333,0.04787379,0.0002554118,0.00009933955,0.000029111465,0.000005452883,0.26805633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540436,0.0003644986,0.0000898352,0.0027416009,0.0004999581,0.0000018221057,0.000004635454,0.0000027949732,0.00089048693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915993,0.0001377279,0.00018082892,0.00006104664,0.0003682579,0.000092222814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999484,0.0001688529,0.00011245506,0.000082880695,0.00012177702,0.000030015783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007531016,0.00004620715,0.00008444253,0.000014653874,0.00013224759,0.00024807456,0.00044907522,0.00003165494,0.00012483768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033633994,0.000025757256,0.00005373863,0.00007252432,0.0002250213,0.00015716994,0.000042301534,0.0001979019,0.000008880197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017647328,0.000034567038,0.000048999176,8.226636e-7,0.00002138331,0.00019497916,0.009793407,9.141628e-7,0.00035271214,0.98756176,0.00035191514,0.0016209126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003241722,0.00004575903,0.00047410824,0.000088191344,0.000056708664,0.00078676373,0.091857076,0.000033791108,0.003763914,0.19544737,0.7039931,0.0002115335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048409007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055931723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7921144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025220612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005181641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7318026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131688914","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3740065","title":"Disinheritance, Discrimination and the Case for Including Adult Independent Children in Dependants’ Relief Schemes: Lawen Estate v Nova Scotia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Estate; Nova (rocket); Genealogy; Geography; Political science; History; Engineering; Archaeology; Law; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.024370044121062556,"score_gpt":0.30774286291094155,"score_spread":0.28337281878987897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131688914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9584601,0.00063458696,0.007672848,0.03133895,0.00004953324,0.00064547383,0.000011231209,0.000020838901,0.0011664643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638903,0.0027380486,0.00019706532,0.00030299107,0.00025686732,0.000014931858,0.000004115477,0.000012950582,0.000083975225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983812,0.000114711824,0.00025426966,0.00019337735,0.00019373337,0.00086271326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994984,0.0000982146,0.00015054035,0.00007411261,0.000084361316,0.00009434364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015951399,0.0000977741,0.0001349929,0.000034711065,0.0007145165,0.00016528994,0.00023790105,0.000053026957,0.0000064106184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029544486,0.00007232927,0.000056464447,0.00023319195,0.00014542424,0.00030739553,0.00006276655,0.00078868534,0.000004240208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010748454,0.000038594495,0.00620876,0.000007407874,0.00004366675,0.000008469656,0.0110586,0.000022701983,0.00004708008,0.9625554,0.000037818932,0.019864012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02000152,0.0006326369,0.016550304,0.0002065424,0.0003551193,0.0021150094,0.19329415,0.0058109136,0.00021572008,0.7445301,0.014937339,0.0013506456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006123675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17924283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21802531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003441016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065963285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9257206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134361335","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3615","title":"A Right Without a Rights-Holder Is Hollow: Introduction to OHLJ’s Special Issue on Identifying Rights-Bearing Aboriginal Peoples","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Constitution; Positivism; Context (archaeology); Section (typography); Political science; Human rights; Sociology; Indigenous; Dilemma; Philosophy; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01970307973863611,"score_gpt":0.334144007238395,"score_spread":0.3144409274997589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134361335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038278073,0.000098407385,0.0012652447,0.034101713,0.0032396223,0.00035769577,0.000024492143,0.00011330809,0.9225215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91217154,0.0001117224,0.0042870594,0.0008848834,0.061473716,0.00002563693,0.0000111638765,0.00003160672,0.02100267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709535,0.00021957488,0.0004650638,0.00057072274,0.0010110552,0.00063825963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984526,0.00006750723,0.00021082877,0.00038262157,0.0003931696,0.0004932425],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007549264,0.00024317829,0.00031415056,0.00011997969,0.0043524895,0.0012245617,0.00046083127,0.00014742203,0.007958546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054019936,0.00021188354,0.0002157898,0.000529925,0.0001606339,0.0006636492,0.00007128735,0.000677616,0.0015540443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003784475,0.00017963295,0.0002488065,0.000009534029,0.000061574974,0.00009446158,0.007255954,0.000063518935,0.0008623888,0.95603925,0.03457013,0.000576872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040292303,0.000040568226,0.00040992617,0.00008518025,0.000056317866,0.0000942935,0.0008570015,0.000012048578,0.0043191495,0.048550844,0.9448722,0.00029952748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028487613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38821375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003094269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031813403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134682005","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v10i1.736","title":"Disability and Contractual Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Morality; Realm; Economic Justice; Social contract; Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual disability; Subject (documents); Politics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.06441484961363104,"score_gpt":0.3703899828580848,"score_spread":0.30597513324445375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134682005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.946756,0.003530735,0.000011694217,0.046023026,0.00019276723,0.0000839595,0.000033518623,0.000004910387,0.003363409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992131,0.00013666709,0.0001959266,0.00011250666,0.00021820905,0.000004576347,7.6272397e-7,0.0000028414424,0.00011542478],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916023,0.00014321694,0.00026046849,0.00011368799,0.00013123138,0.0001911801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852407,0.0004663428,0.000079496866,0.00012210238,0.0004076757,0.00040031335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043457653,0.0000592797,0.00018055266,0.000011285948,0.00077169755,0.00007255753,0.00009714462,0.00003285932,0.00009511886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027272457,0.000053369433,0.00007175164,0.00015657124,0.0024554995,0.00017863889,0.000015653359,0.000118376745,0.0000029239352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004808667,0.00013196678,0.80281574,0.000026832471,0.00014904888,0.00001632606,0.07620219,0.000006248469,0.000019310311,0.109773465,0.002159028,0.008695054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024916785,0.000029668568,0.4963504,0.000024248322,0.000062410916,0.000011250124,0.36233062,0.0000018553925,0.000039544782,0.017806964,0.12295465,0.00013922185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008875564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6472686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63839304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040558155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008314834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134767072","doi":"","title":"Reform in Small Steps: The Case of The Dependent Contractor","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Sight; Independent contractor; Honour; Work (physics); Law and economics; Legislation; Law; Business; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.016121528827170592,"score_gpt":0.28237460413937726,"score_spread":0.26625307531220666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134767072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.969683,0.00044706737,0.0004405713,0.019808805,0.00009243051,0.00019882899,0.000003999263,0.0000058715777,0.009319449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647343,0.00092705025,0.000004967912,0.00006427019,0.00015010229,0.000006758225,3.4350155e-8,0.000004133185,0.0023692376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875313,0.00012615065,0.00017903592,0.00006881531,0.00011710895,0.000755756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953735,0.00008917528,0.00013719556,0.00014954097,0.00005163778,0.000035093748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021320183,0.000046735237,0.00006461746,0.000016999733,0.00039926977,0.000025079584,0.00039730384,0.00003847268,0.00002566345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090226175,0.000018408191,0.00006497925,0.00012307982,0.00012430924,0.000081721286,0.0000351896,0.0005259899,0.000006642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000705837,0.00002615179,0.0010366666,4.534576e-7,0.000013782159,0.000003943437,0.0008743618,9.77851e-7,0.0002534547,0.967786,0.000006280384,0.02999084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018318816,0.00013707345,0.008946561,0.000069032954,0.000053725522,0.0012019669,0.07026106,0.000015982027,0.00072848646,0.84695446,0.06953985,0.0002599206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01018076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44363475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43345398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012133503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015407766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99641055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135083697","doi":"","title":"Unique Public Duties of Care: Judicial Activism in the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Political science; Tort; Government (linguistics); Supreme Court Decisions; Liability","score_opus":0.01344827350989983,"score_gpt":0.26428231188408197,"score_spread":0.2508340383741821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135083697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91380453,0.00074962794,0.0006097865,0.061861087,0.000106813495,0.00021046068,0.000015498352,0.000005931133,0.02263628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985473,0.000949038,0.0000060017624,0.00005003235,0.00012942657,0.00000452951,3.585848e-7,0.0000038934477,0.00030941333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984212,0.00017088339,0.00018758021,0.0000648854,0.0003622349,0.000793225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994548,0.00012921117,0.0001470632,0.00010034563,0.00013113927,0.000037464084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014963695,0.000049707665,0.00010344973,0.00003930826,0.00022722402,0.00001503784,0.0004115901,0.00003727336,0.000027520357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012772651,0.000029252886,0.00004160925,0.00019964861,0.00014667862,0.0001266352,0.000017696066,0.00037517617,4.0638784e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007676402,0.000020300322,0.0027957428,0.0000017215668,0.00001557256,3.147359e-7,0.0023877253,0.0000012004796,0.00033123998,0.9896369,0.0002301862,0.0045714513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009658579,0.00027130006,0.012686707,0.00006163258,0.00003167367,0.000024278568,0.13972378,0.0000036096703,0.0016255531,0.6339836,0.21036248,0.0002595039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41151607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.569258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009535346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01543598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99014556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135184885","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0018","title":"The domain of private law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Reciprocal; Law; Normative; Core (optical fiber); Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Institution; Sociology; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.01659580473579248,"score_gpt":0.24110670887428515,"score_spread":0.22451090413849267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135184885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03883609,0.00035232,0.0012545713,0.018817509,0.00006931969,0.00010267245,0.000011168127,0.000013555042,0.9405428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815965,0.00029150245,0.0010970378,0.00010414412,0.0000843829,1.335408e-8,1.7788678e-7,0.0000014247082,0.0002616709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995739,0.00006119376,0.0000698489,0.000041978,0.00016510797,0.000088009976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996252,0.00003943818,0.000112760536,0.000057613935,0.000066474284,0.00009852579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021904113,0.000025679312,0.000060148563,0.0000013303118,0.0011922746,0.000018786723,0.00035053675,0.000022874929,0.00028315763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009508985,0.000021726322,0.000062576546,0.000021251304,0.0003962425,0.000185113,0.000050977018,0.00006379901,0.00000392875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015090498,0.000009364456,0.0000627809,0.0000013806232,0.000012916955,0.0000012943025,0.008157389,0.0000046080477,0.00022083249,0.9904209,0.0006141679,0.00047929137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014690455,0.000022626082,0.00025943658,0.0000040507935,0.000008358236,4.2388172e-7,0.013193877,0.000006298593,0.000054037766,0.0035921272,0.98268527,0.000026584243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056098513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16519994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98682874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006593944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042044067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.950187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135278352","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3600192","title":"Gifts and Contracts: A Comparison with Quebec Civil Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Commercial law; Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.016232374467631133,"score_gpt":0.28123743107951943,"score_spread":0.2650050566118883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135278352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61934876,0.008950655,0.016979951,0.21804494,0.00009854716,0.0006913478,0.0000089015575,0.00020842631,0.13566844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751425,0.0006120017,0.00006130635,0.00088494655,0.0003039826,0.0000037898353,7.974502e-7,0.0000076043984,0.00061129767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985761,0.00006276206,0.00013221081,0.00012097936,0.00020683523,0.00090108585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995824,0.000041555726,0.00009354244,0.000049816415,0.000050623083,0.00018205316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005005767,0.00006938127,0.0001197971,0.000010835139,0.00061611104,0.00015656678,0.0001552279,0.00003909648,0.000027809598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002844681,0.000054845026,0.00002677039,0.00012331652,0.00016994023,0.00019914318,0.000016777783,0.00080988434,0.000016230253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022419123,0.000021604508,0.0010788222,0.0000011902159,0.000029442905,0.0000010392894,0.0037495103,0.000008404566,0.000059252332,0.9913275,0.000113913426,0.0035869048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089398166,0.00026305948,0.0010616961,0.000014675778,0.00004830916,0.000026968604,0.019682815,0.00014783123,0.00003345197,0.051812254,0.92579716,0.00021779351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014174877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51094717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93951523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000233245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014973214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135476353","doi":"10.34961/19004","title":"Protection for owners under the Irish law on adverse possession: an inconsistent use test or a qualified veto system?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Possession (linguistics); Irish; Law; Test (biology); Adverse possession; Business; Political science; History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09536791324339762,"score_gpt":0.27555295384574285,"score_spread":0.18018504060234525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135476353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.855987,0.000051387047,0.047809444,0.01695528,0.0006543993,0.0034046501,0.00042262115,0.0004507368,0.07426448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965721,0.000020305513,0.0015727254,0.0001926457,0.0001021105,7.238362e-7,0.000020012762,0.0000070935475,0.0015123105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986036,0.00020450419,0.0001747349,0.00035811545,0.00046139487,0.00019764666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841714,0.00030435357,0.00040313887,0.00026633768,0.0003781012,0.00023093104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002193171,0.00014074272,0.00024621634,0.000059209302,0.0033374466,0.000027121956,0.0005378789,0.0001262705,0.00004095055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007003832,0.00013646689,0.00020885914,0.00049697346,0.0015909474,0.000730624,0.00011631597,0.00016512007,0.000015141477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0073758583,0.0017783727,0.0010602315,0.00041882938,0.0006593128,0.00018332453,0.038852513,0.012237983,0.024463585,0.908499,0.0034369822,0.0010340104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022611131,0.0020925987,0.0053816885,0.00025350624,0.0005193426,0.000023565559,0.40583462,0.0032594241,0.00071794883,0.000042182222,0.5790017,0.0006122988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02183742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011522638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9084568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032922107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081740145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135687096","doi":"","title":"Contract, Power, and the Value of Donative Promises","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Sanctions; Power (physics); Incentive; Variety (cybernetics); Coercion (linguistics); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.0112516883647527,"score_gpt":0.31264110179906995,"score_spread":0.30138941343431724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135687096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.855541,0.0028812273,0.0005359196,0.03990609,0.000095437885,0.00039936297,0.000004348267,0.000010960538,0.100625694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482185,0.0035862916,0.000023473005,0.000045125995,0.000115018665,0.000005059212,1.02828544e-7,0.0000031863897,0.0013998918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990383,0.00009472277,0.000111178604,0.000063764695,0.00016409485,0.0005279574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994085,0.00010602755,0.00024366811,0.00012476408,0.000078047284,0.000038987146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022801822,0.00004238429,0.0000921575,0.000011355457,0.00161406,0.00012890452,0.00036166847,0.000027315476,0.000015291069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033187092,0.000025785237,0.000049757928,0.000023283532,0.0006515049,0.00017272399,0.000034537803,0.00047643873,0.0000022845352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023447323,0.00001263726,0.00056565844,4.397168e-7,0.00003240827,1.1956506e-7,0.002055281,7.837798e-7,0.000027468055,0.9929588,0.000016080145,0.0043069054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013365031,0.00005645861,0.008798078,0.000008621049,0.00003177093,0.000016296051,0.0066253035,0.000034964996,0.00006883492,0.94255686,0.040395513,0.000070792245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026074273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044231843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13928089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009934345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011174373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136109984","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3635097","title":"Restitution in the Context of Criminal Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Restitution; Criminal justice; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04176280137491262,"score_gpt":0.3629167789248059,"score_spread":0.3211539775498933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136109984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8967171,0.0007069694,0.0017800649,0.01853073,0.00018600932,0.00018951496,0.0000019577162,0.0000073383517,0.08188035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977505,0.0014201362,0.000018039585,0.00008535126,0.00026391944,0.0000031482334,2.4064536e-7,0.0000018381426,0.00045682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989637,0.00009007866,0.000121342084,0.000055701006,0.00019613242,0.00057301926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955964,0.000049604747,0.00015727032,0.00015558852,0.00005542462,0.000022459419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002614293,0.000033630768,0.00005419828,0.000021121314,0.0012836523,0.00009311831,0.0005655969,0.000030300527,0.000007886681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031341554,0.000023729388,0.00003589854,0.00004425614,0.0002218303,0.00018511573,0.00001692602,0.0005952224,0.000008530981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007133273,0.000022573435,0.0005664295,0.0000018206342,0.0000036747037,6.01954e-7,0.004236186,0.0000023027305,0.000047961563,0.986632,0.000036392004,0.008442953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008113037,0.00016660699,0.02698146,0.0000410281,0.00018368938,0.00006707761,0.2966265,0.000052503667,0.00008248734,0.56406945,0.11074901,0.00016889817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046205386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04388517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42256254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022084452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014577918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98729455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136603669","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3752386","title":"The Past Present and Future of the Right to Housing in Canada from the Charter To the National Housing Strategy: Where is the Right to Social Housing in Canada Today","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Public housing; Political science; Public administration; Economic growth; Housing tenure; Low income housing; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01106696403941525,"score_gpt":0.24723019415925385,"score_spread":0.23616323011983859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136603669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48467535,0.00048137523,0.000039969316,0.51373655,0.0001284695,0.00039069078,0.000043101514,0.0000025585236,0.0005019443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908168,0.00016537245,0.0000064339133,0.006294884,0.0026344126,0.000015932756,6.0259686e-7,0.0000123370355,0.000053277003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735504,0.0003473346,0.00030501428,0.00019757083,0.0008326576,0.0009624072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924934,0.0002540202,0.000145947,0.00013693274,0.00010605133,0.00010772658],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011241697,0.00013253858,0.00013810284,0.000015655258,0.002418875,0.00024969017,0.00087528216,0.00003778013,0.00003023895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030661202,0.000058580863,0.000050018258,0.0006187765,0.000073145515,0.00008954089,0.00013138367,0.0010623313,0.0000010553572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037661614,0.00013281683,0.07354876,0.000022406479,0.0006671912,0.000021362452,0.23105708,0.019370807,0.0014471891,0.2891185,0.23822223,0.14601505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033956318,0.00003163068,0.05459197,0.000044832508,0.00003298214,0.0000047089598,0.08937903,0.00044787224,0.000102631355,0.011166784,0.8435924,0.00026558203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60537016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029733633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016694592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136894329","doi":"","title":"What Would the Defendant Have Done But for the Wrong","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Damages; Plaintiff; Duty; Virtue; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020374810590144947,"score_gpt":0.3074067587529545,"score_spread":0.2870319481628095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136894329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5307288,0.030234331,0.0320379,0.37940595,0.0027816046,0.0034810181,0.00001543894,0.00010312605,0.021211816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638206,0.010989762,0.000017777273,0.0005574741,0.0007721503,0.000037453377,7.965299e-7,0.000011183173,0.023792848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980513,0.00007519983,0.00015083238,0.00012074344,0.000276765,0.0013251976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926275,0.00028736374,0.0001150246,0.0002022846,0.000081333244,0.000051256437],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002735469,0.00007694292,0.00008223117,0.000016295504,0.0016015173,0.00040651503,0.00061491394,0.0000777517,0.00006697595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005485693,0.000039897,0.0001386184,0.00010100615,0.00012116303,0.0003093867,0.000038557097,0.0014363643,0.00007593311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012976588,0.000016405167,0.0003633436,0.0000010568733,0.000056888126,8.61919e-8,0.0022158823,0.000042875916,0.0001190342,0.977326,0.0003303022,0.019515151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003051886,0.00006698575,0.00036550406,0.000009428353,0.000041254785,0.00002028075,0.08915051,0.00018836817,0.000047793685,0.2104895,0.6992106,0.00010460644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077724457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015322147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7668365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041384684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014236607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137164538","doi":"","title":"Abuse of Court Process: A Study of How Vanuatu Court of Appeal Has Addressed Abuse of Court Process Over Two Decades","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Appeal; Jurisdiction; Court of record; Political science; Law of the case; Original jurisdiction; Statutory law; High Court","score_opus":0.024554571988600872,"score_gpt":0.3414410441551522,"score_spread":0.3168864721665513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137164538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99549174,0.0005590923,0.0010216483,0.0012389644,0.000052452575,0.0006885087,0.000035208195,0.000020434973,0.0008919757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997756,0.001563232,0.000040357576,0.000012829596,0.00017435312,0.000032173197,0.0000012895999,0.000027518337,0.00039227062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963264,0.00018491801,0.0007610729,0.00029181282,0.0012109934,0.0012248039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969302,0.00018286714,0.0013757942,0.00031283082,0.0010483173,0.00014998602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023012147,0.00021297531,0.00056398,0.00017591722,0.00030617177,0.000040982086,0.0009414034,0.00012031791,0.000032088203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016703292,0.00015426744,0.00016439473,0.000585674,0.0005980055,0.00046202933,0.000031344345,0.0006364777,0.0000018741897],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023366045,0.022874735,0.21654877,0.0009348788,0.0037523,0.000008280989,0.3102084,0.00079113396,0.058750615,0.37015554,0.0020249388,0.01161379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.041338976,0.010217566,0.037097305,0.002981594,0.0024047457,0.00012639894,0.54694664,0.00057545217,0.067490354,0.26824623,0.019742738,0.002831961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069836795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007789287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23673823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029829668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004249448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75383383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137435438","doi":"","title":"Native Title Litigation in Australia: Does the Judiciary Deliver on the Principal Objectives Defined by Mabo?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); High Court; Law; Common law; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.014681122820820347,"score_gpt":0.2871455877466234,"score_spread":0.27246446492580306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137435438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90052646,0.00024120146,0.00011524114,0.025603602,0.00010017882,0.00034113432,0.0000043034565,0.000015600352,0.073052265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918495,0.00038095456,0.000006917915,0.00017918342,0.00015901953,0.000026362375,9.213154e-7,0.0000040472864,0.0073931366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908286,0.00012446618,0.00008840737,0.00007136799,0.0001636245,0.00046928643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968815,0.00012366606,0.000055059314,0.00006406463,0.00004564503,0.00002342797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007057051,0.000047250593,0.000041473497,0.000018477078,0.00037584017,0.00006233622,0.00018847636,0.00003477497,0.0004198174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074476804,0.00002315956,0.000030765543,0.00012863899,0.00009872303,0.00009475159,0.000013617272,0.000637691,0.00029130498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017843771,0.00002360683,0.00037834886,2.1083491e-7,0.000013684441,8.659143e-8,0.0013734336,0.000003917179,0.000078180805,0.99399674,0.0022323516,0.0018976303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011900683,0.000039746377,0.010731428,0.000009483892,0.000007590188,0.000002244702,0.009630116,0.00003425614,0.00013519537,0.9339551,0.04525222,0.0000836493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004547521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006482784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09132298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035039394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033482793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6874522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137484143","doi":"10.1017/9781108674355.009","title":"Divergence and Convergence in English and Canadian Administrative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Jurisdiction; Divergence (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Judicial review; Political science; Law; Convergence (economics); Suspect; Comparative law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03902714839844392,"score_gpt":0.2468867709113449,"score_spread":0.20785962251290097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137484143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015166143,0.00021951002,0.000005311677,0.00009635153,0.000099769844,0.00026592883,0.00033094749,0.000025296764,0.9974403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16414915,0.000686698,0.000027402239,0.00008814056,0.00006660896,9.712924e-7,0.00001510136,0.000008223093,0.8349577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913895,0.000040819858,0.00009661388,0.00036253588,0.00013558751,0.00022550109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992096,0.00006151113,0.000064678025,0.00016026974,0.00014375466,0.00036022803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000103722894,0.00014420769,0.0001807007,0.000059785063,0.0004951637,0.00007171663,0.00020747355,0.00021865695,0.000016831553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019452842,0.00019084856,0.00003476725,0.000013032929,0.00072552456,0.00010109153,0.0001667202,0.00026402282,0.000001709718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037766424,0.000002089416,0.000075354306,0.000012966034,0.000013380915,0.00011429079,0.0015446706,1.1972138e-7,0.0000018369115,0.9971326,0.0009511205,0.00014782033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011648571,0.000008945774,0.00021216083,0.00005550869,0.000028495631,0.0000010270085,0.001348268,0.0000045045845,0.000015074322,0.000050739716,0.99794716,0.00021161484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30145785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33234718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019077076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057187595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77825785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137563335","doi":"","title":"A Critical Analysis of the Case of Prorogations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Prerogative; Justiciability; Judicial review; Political science; Common law; Doctrine; Political question; Politics","score_opus":0.015448265656292329,"score_gpt":0.3478864605632822,"score_spread":0.3324381949069899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137563335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663595,0.0008659511,0.0049553993,0.014573949,0.00006448711,0.000089583504,0.000018212198,0.000007067962,0.013065874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889386,0.0002281423,0.00008821022,0.000023975661,0.000046632067,0.000002332912,5.3316836e-7,0.000002014006,0.0007143104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990658,0.00013680382,0.00016914391,0.000060756953,0.00014128102,0.00042620444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993552,0.00011139338,0.00008262629,0.00012287499,0.00029284557,0.00003507841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008156919,0.000028487271,0.00009240782,0.000040986233,0.00040855186,0.000019179717,0.00014123663,0.000027442604,0.000088772635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044370422,0.000021001351,0.00017451197,0.0010504749,0.00016221087,0.00006344401,0.000025307112,0.00034874355,9.0552885e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.6707266e-7,0.000049080256,0.0010323405,0.0000011694634,0.00017598235,0.0000030995002,0.001051733,0.00003690859,0.00020432049,0.99608994,0.0000074318154,0.0013472026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030387734,0.000060406615,0.0055920924,0.000020217072,0.0025026319,0.00055507617,0.08768105,0.0007450254,0.0014020024,0.8899242,0.011048149,0.0001652721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001142409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06824818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10616577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015388717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029622295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94875383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138859816","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3687056","title":"Regulating Financial Misconduct: ‘Should the Existing Law Be Administered or Enforced Differently?’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Business; Law; Political science; Accounting","score_opus":0.1583568748610334,"score_gpt":0.3664788220547393,"score_spread":0.20812194719370591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138859816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6503677,0.0007473,0.0047780187,0.21122451,0.00039457728,0.00089331163,0.000019708634,0.00022396154,0.13135092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915274,0.00016862465,0.0000987041,0.0025660035,0.0016029814,0.000011883268,0.0000027022954,0.000016427848,0.004005274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974492,0.00015635864,0.00031877373,0.00019947904,0.00038920497,0.001486953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992404,0.00015514383,0.00022203694,0.0001397171,0.000069871465,0.00017285078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011352712,0.00013064475,0.00015916524,0.000014853629,0.0022677062,0.00024303334,0.00056319946,0.00008640774,0.000111794005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052071945,0.00008491066,0.00012059671,0.00025929324,0.00018891587,0.00018861766,0.000073271374,0.0014624913,0.000014856143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003735018,0.000012719833,0.00005149705,0.0000029486293,0.0000198458,0.0000013261218,0.006649283,0.000007896299,0.00042611844,0.9875352,0.00019269128,0.0050631557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012760514,0.00045826202,0.0002640212,0.00004543403,0.00010254833,0.00008109175,0.040790018,0.0005489089,0.00060308125,0.25075978,0.7045262,0.0005446494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001012181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01958179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7367754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033026474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025855256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139977896","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249.013","title":"Dicey’s Administrative Law Blind Spot","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Venn diagram; Law; Administrative law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.08294616676953988,"score_gpt":0.28377355353708156,"score_spread":0.2008273867675417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139977896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027150127,0.00004155766,0.000108518136,0.0005622647,0.00011296348,0.0005641518,0.0005479827,0.00016429355,0.9978711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02196101,0.00007238617,0.00007995928,0.00029031312,0.00042065815,0.0000014426863,0.000052187894,0.000027098165,0.97709495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871147,0.000050470113,0.00015482986,0.00047326327,0.0003569532,0.00025303251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988773,0.000089705616,0.00019934778,0.00032417773,0.00014608586,0.00036337486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009884989,0.000245303,0.0002861474,0.00004428948,0.0008331312,0.000106464024,0.0006635303,0.0003463121,0.000028434142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012308807,0.00030130384,0.00020196014,0.000013164809,0.0008456397,0.000109030036,0.00026476194,0.00049912644,0.00009949014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047988528,0.000007995907,2.8386518e-7,0.000015668596,0.000060824404,0.00009742332,0.0005342657,2.7406355e-7,0.000008086191,0.9838064,0.0151934195,0.00022739095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029620845,0.00003175577,0.000002294988,0.00003826056,0.00013259011,9.553822e-7,0.00040402368,0.000004035156,0.000065284155,0.00016646998,0.9985352,0.0003229174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021803605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003110719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9836399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021099324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041976644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140244933","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Torts Tomorrow - a Tribute to John Fleming Edited by Nicholas JMullany and Allen M Linden","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Honour; Tort; Scholarship; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.006978418648179334,"score_gpt":0.2895823499447976,"score_spread":0.28260393129661826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140244933","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015524137,0.6530083,0.0052075647,0.3168274,0.00035790907,0.0012945,0.000029662508,0.00013956914,0.0076109897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15802652,0.7496867,0.00032452817,0.026695097,0.002850858,0.0000902083,0.000022709426,0.000056180168,0.062247187],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750525,0.00008023471,0.00029305875,0.00023315159,0.00038479394,0.0015034854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928176,0.000038812952,0.00013378034,0.00014900995,0.000101290185,0.0002953587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019073695,0.00012910146,0.0001976335,0.00004906271,0.0007672119,0.00013291596,0.00032341873,0.00008438073,0.000103608785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017779501,0.00011828616,0.00008005568,0.00021508429,0.000054730368,0.00028256385,0.000057941328,0.0009765774,0.00005110521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045508048,0.00018752848,0.00022541979,0.000044585875,0.00018905096,0.000011243135,0.0045643295,0.000034686855,0.0011789553,0.060083136,0.9030959,0.030339684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003482624,0.00009078816,0.000031488264,0.00012575126,0.000033306434,0.000045562774,0.00047467602,0.0000014467734,0.00004841096,0.008316997,0.9903278,0.00015555682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007998243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041573397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29013228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001013729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016758207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5900851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140706674","doi":"","title":"Making Sense of the Victim’s Role in Clemency Decision Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Democracy; Process (computing); Law and economics; Law; Decision-making; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.0175197173505355,"score_gpt":0.34357691084137104,"score_spread":0.32605719349083556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140706674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550157,0.00035539115,0.0033374291,0.0017788374,0.00016450147,0.00015369413,0.0000010403469,0.00001194747,0.039181467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885154,0.0002503381,0.00023777357,0.000085960026,0.0003578789,0.000002159157,5.4875137e-8,0.0000065086892,0.00020778684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835974,0.000113534545,0.00022845603,0.00010076162,0.0002929576,0.00090457225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953187,0.0000662337,0.00016199706,0.00013414532,0.00008280673,0.000022972728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002011078,0.000055103832,0.000077608995,0.000051718765,0.0006133575,0.000039393515,0.00030782312,0.000046067566,0.00007463413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012222823,0.000040402603,0.00006469721,0.00037689973,0.000118760734,0.00011918023,0.00006514827,0.00061800506,0.000014260738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024643388,0.00004344198,0.011481582,0.0000010609541,0.0000140268185,5.374057e-7,0.006068816,0.00002779218,0.00056900905,0.8999087,0.000042976942,0.081817396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003337765,0.000083175764,0.014610884,0.000112002745,0.000015650514,0.0000368431,0.019558363,0.00028161227,0.00013235299,0.9199928,0.044709478,0.00013304317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044615395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04258286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08168435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052139297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012010512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141775535","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.30","title":"The Rule of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Comparative law; Law; Relation (database); Political science; Rule of law; Philosophy of law; Municipal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.059381543116924215,"score_gpt":0.3420947793568676,"score_spread":0.2827132362399434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141775535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006088475,0.00077217724,0.000026369438,0.0142302755,0.00017794459,0.00013906654,0.000045549274,0.00003041538,0.9845721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016890414,0.056465723,0.00020611892,0.00080773816,0.0012565245,0.000039631544,0.000037399914,0.000012985871,0.92428344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999347,0.000037812748,0.00013225377,0.000104829385,0.00025261455,0.00012550325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995028,0.00014705723,0.00008375782,0.00015412795,0.000052546882,0.000059723767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012764423,0.000055505152,0.000107883505,0.000004833937,0.00050413416,0.00006171254,0.0004389347,0.00010806212,0.00032210888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003894046,0.000033206878,0.0000729751,0.000088094705,0.00027351425,0.000023798366,0.00007644798,0.0001633674,0.00015079883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.0724018e-7,0.0000046685727,0.0000016825054,0.0000072997286,0.0000071389177,6.554269e-8,0.0005856544,4.2765855e-8,1.1453482e-7,0.8393321,0.15197396,0.00808687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016593252,0.0000032742312,0.0000070541228,0.000011110875,0.000009117753,1.8795019e-8,0.00044331996,0.0000011698586,0.000006767106,0.00854288,0.99091446,0.00004424911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008661665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043278635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8389405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024440615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028970515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99793977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141839934","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511558696.006","title":"Glossary and list of abbreviations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Glossary; Computer science; Natural language processing; Information retrieval; Library science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04398244953503608,"score_gpt":0.2375905847057855,"score_spread":0.19360813517074943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141839934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013507502,0.00016153135,0.0001269886,0.000052608815,0.00004583788,0.0002618391,0.000292395,0.000043305285,0.99888045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016629431,0.0005394524,0.00008436616,0.000023181059,0.000080610494,5.045926e-7,0.000013984645,0.0000113274555,0.98261714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938935,0.000024737117,0.00011417751,0.0002044785,0.0001446541,0.00012258354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992948,0.000050503102,0.00017262516,0.00023631315,0.00012773028,0.000118009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009668497,0.00011568169,0.0001843623,0.00006207702,0.00035196386,0.000019115867,0.00027739513,0.00019221983,0.00001712456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008945429,0.00014020652,0.00008924084,0.0000073515744,0.0005905985,0.00006579952,0.0001739677,0.00016078996,0.000005454208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005683327,0.000005456815,0.00000802129,0.000025120093,0.000030101695,0.000004772949,0.00039874218,4.565225e-8,0.0000074489926,0.9919138,0.006774259,0.0008265248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095894386,0.000009598499,0.000064429616,0.00004603748,0.00010073792,5.6232386e-7,0.0000857725,0.0000012958864,0.000023004852,0.00019979589,0.99923396,0.00013890637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041441973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010938478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006174512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013772471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6264814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142295970","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1399627","title":"Accessing Insolvent Consumer Debtors, Challenges and Strategies for Empirical Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Business; Blockchain; Empirical research; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.1729166579989637,"score_gpt":0.47400573370559274,"score_spread":0.301089075706629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142295970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6804452,0.10288215,0.007380672,0.15446517,0.00017107964,0.00089208124,0.0000042114766,0.0001056053,0.05365384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614435,0.037469093,0.000165665,0.000090076304,0.000400133,0.000010579361,5.504687e-7,0.0000056593235,0.0004147448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978054,0.00015280148,0.0001454309,0.00015561709,0.00029047817,0.0014502564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994445,0.00015834418,0.00005240975,0.00007677924,0.00015505892,0.00011291993],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034360331,0.00006575471,0.000096655705,0.00007007471,0.001316029,0.00028489644,0.00022243027,0.00007405666,0.0000062578138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001012907,0.000055705492,0.000043830918,0.000114954106,0.00017648589,0.0003264203,0.000020634003,0.0008892359,0.000003377313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011616792,0.00003774115,0.00009586679,0.0000019389856,0.000011949741,2.9260121e-7,0.0028020847,9.501193e-7,0.00006079829,0.8721833,0.0001437037,0.12464971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020747136,0.00016033427,0.0015638348,0.000010635525,0.00000780083,0.000011301968,0.032449763,0.000016927359,0.00000941708,0.811819,0.15366608,0.00007743967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011731252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047002174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2809983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003789681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034903556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143561997","doi":"","title":"What makes a good law of security","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapters","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Law; Legislation; Commission; Flexibility (engineering); Security interest; Personal property; Government (linguistics); Business; Law reform; Law and economics; Political science; Property (philosophy); Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06772309781639028,"score_gpt":0.3411578870906921,"score_spread":0.2734347892743018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143561997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40121287,0.00028730038,0.00004659941,0.009198239,0.00039070702,0.00017809508,0.000007673584,0.00005332295,0.5886252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991285,0.000045613546,0.000063611325,0.00022883774,0.00007779771,0.000005454804,0.000001054033,0.0000023928185,0.00044671772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996219,0.000017535374,0.00006434676,0.00006914425,0.00013566844,0.00009137082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997224,0.000016739688,0.000032324944,0.00009438261,0.000045974528,0.00008817448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019753842,0.000028760467,0.000051482955,0.000008907782,0.00008006485,0.000042029013,0.00011846837,0.00002675413,0.000029037887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015541553,0.000026854552,0.00002585395,0.000062510764,0.00019045072,0.00021921018,0.000023157314,0.000031464555,0.000037656075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014435476,0.000015162003,0.00014878694,0.0000018576593,0.0000025491888,2.5574565e-7,0.02742034,0.0000013249311,0.000035635363,0.971487,0.00020202703,0.00068364554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014336179,0.000016837257,0.00009494454,0.000012940635,0.0000054468824,2.1488701e-7,0.041242868,0.000021168786,0.00046528733,0.039421495,0.9185059,0.00006950894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029388538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027071696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9320655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002124671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036862366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44426873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144418566","doi":"","title":"Clarifying Causation in Tort","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Tort; Law; Jurisprudence; Common law; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Liability","score_opus":0.028507608875246778,"score_gpt":0.31494653009856344,"score_spread":0.28643892122331666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144418566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4536968,0.00015950277,0.00026937918,0.0113647515,0.00015009394,0.00035498312,0.0000039499864,0.00013955483,0.533861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995428,0.000033199576,0.00060422416,0.001403396,0.00029645857,0.000014927587,0.0000050245653,0.000003995161,0.0022107325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920666,0.00005592152,0.00015404895,0.00016019224,0.00020046276,0.00022272796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996346,0.00002865696,0.000040432315,0.00015222823,0.000032511674,0.000111567286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040353462,0.000057421745,0.00007836491,0.000027343503,0.00034735326,0.00010337093,0.00016453624,0.00009165883,0.00021466968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007165139,0.000060320017,0.000032798478,0.00024462043,0.000050029717,0.000296492,0.000014554,0.00018948643,0.00023411826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022688441,0.00004134129,0.0046086907,0.0000012960752,0.0000012748384,0.000001999241,0.00093792245,0.00003077952,0.00041894076,0.9900341,0.0006554403,0.0032659287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020543736,0.000016897437,0.065837726,0.000015992528,0.000004173325,3.5115258e-7,0.0005592044,0.00003940885,0.0001934335,0.027591852,0.9053892,0.00014636238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01135024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026850712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013670346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091337635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99523324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145954647","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249.008","title":"Lectures Introductory to the Law of the Constitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Constitution; Law; Salary; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Sociology; Classics; History; Political science; Commercial law","score_opus":0.02646494808809045,"score_gpt":0.22600364383944405,"score_spread":0.1995386957513536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145954647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036846475,0.000050484316,0.0001550508,0.0032062398,0.00022146468,0.00054768333,0.00016561928,0.00003560332,0.99558103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11558727,0.0000210042,0.000016592714,0.0006426184,0.00038596906,8.605871e-7,0.0000043615237,0.00000684012,0.88333446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992809,0.000058548576,0.00009231153,0.00020946976,0.00024504395,0.000113700626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926984,0.00005268711,0.00011866487,0.0003651995,0.00011223626,0.000081353544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010449523,0.0001081361,0.00013402589,0.000018523544,0.0007691118,0.00002894474,0.00075344194,0.00011812469,0.000005265033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026456515,0.00007936465,0.00012868001,0.000014932913,0.0010340086,0.000029307179,0.00031556532,0.00027117584,0.000012057555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008947317,0.0000019262527,4.6550585e-7,0.000007634535,0.000024259354,0.0000013065803,0.0005917783,0.00001065365,0.00004628845,0.9555766,0.04358253,0.0001475831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005448217,0.0000065660324,0.000009304952,0.000022968803,0.0000722432,3.4409e-7,0.00015546908,0.0000016073499,0.0002463469,0.000080867285,0.99925685,0.00009294239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028923454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004565212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95567435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011461251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002552678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5915464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146721543","doi":"10.5195/lawreview.2020.788","title":"A Compelling Case: Exploring the Law of Disclosures After NIFLA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.05425171386841946,"score_gpt":0.28171592817121016,"score_spread":0.2274642143027907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146721543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34166113,0.23055293,0.006710783,0.049912777,0.0005152613,0.0024661284,0.000102334314,0.00017596205,0.36790273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739743,0.025294619,0.00017226645,0.00025386782,0.000030497566,0.0000010104507,0.0000012812661,0.0000030082128,0.00026913773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937534,0.00012758179,0.00012036402,0.00011167673,0.00015996306,0.000105041865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941444,0.00010291888,0.000087935754,0.00022622618,0.00012329032,0.00004515873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031529408,0.000050451465,0.00017527427,0.000006348473,0.0003763967,0.000010233253,0.00019225947,0.000019520538,0.00028819012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014421617,0.000043378128,0.00012288091,0.0001966435,0.00040241232,0.00013051827,0.000093699215,0.000072540046,0.000006122054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018827286,0.000030142472,0.00007438469,0.0002927263,0.000019055567,0.00009389706,0.0029341571,0.000004470056,0.000027007965,0.99524915,0.00017232314,0.0011008156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005491428,0.0000042983147,0.000074008356,0.0006809927,0.00008653545,0.000007698219,0.0030710415,0.0000013429647,0.000050747913,0.0015630176,0.9943453,0.000060066166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009958702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00785393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020577361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005714954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99663407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147685787","doi":"","title":"Remedies in Canadian Administrative Law: A Roadmap to a Parallel Legal Universe","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Law; Political science; Tribunal; Judicial review; Public law; Private law; Supreme court; Common law; Municipal law; Precedent","score_opus":0.033361746254337146,"score_gpt":0.32192390856512504,"score_spread":0.2885621623107879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147685787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10454832,0.000030360701,0.00003272932,0.022587558,0.00017641908,0.0004884552,0.000047769146,0.00006303634,0.8720254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828046,0.000009041337,0.0011014487,0.003057552,0.00047307968,0.00005076361,0.00000549969,0.000009445269,0.012488553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986656,0.00009552009,0.00017069465,0.00028292084,0.00022545226,0.00055982836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872816,0.0000410568,0.00003936446,0.00024014708,0.00011647925,0.00083479274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003740374,0.0001093389,0.0001359767,0.00006315304,0.0008006026,0.00016024748,0.00036593847,0.00009377093,0.00062274653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012783415,0.000114209375,0.000043133656,0.00039609798,0.00046379457,0.00034362567,0.00006558122,0.00017885114,0.0010991186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011999867,0.000021246366,0.000660713,0.0000014381171,0.0000058100904,0.000017682778,0.004195823,0.000005006352,0.00003807318,0.98963296,0.0052804076,0.00012885798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017742893,0.000059797603,0.0017314011,0.000018493552,0.0000043502573,6.706714e-7,0.004095037,0.00000984469,0.00006585753,0.0045446213,0.9891346,0.00015788921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9627812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98508835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041957694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012088259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147698584","doi":"10.29173/alr2642","title":"Toward a Framework to Define the Outer Boundaries of Good Faith in Contractual Performance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Doctrine; Good faith; Transactional leadership; Variance (accounting); Context (archaeology); Law; Supreme court; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Public relations; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03567066301692753,"score_gpt":0.32566717945236323,"score_spread":0.2899965164354357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147698584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10700076,0.07443957,0.00035587873,0.38354826,0.00036089166,0.0020812242,0.000025518912,0.00003089286,0.432157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773815,0.01108989,0.00044646626,0.009935882,0.00006345998,0.000080513,0.0000032765845,0.000005260143,0.0009937121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918264,0.000092505405,0.00024325353,0.0001362939,0.00016978911,0.00017552327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991775,0.00037383242,0.00006257114,0.0002576394,0.00007602585,0.000052395426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037652685,0.00006608003,0.00021479206,0.000005598056,0.00025022615,0.000081656864,0.00024251189,0.00004037992,0.00031659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004888799,0.00004461703,0.00006116833,0.0003563453,0.00021284464,0.00009485285,0.00006627965,0.00012953235,0.00010001502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013221719,0.000025870926,0.00063269946,0.00015102208,0.00000679652,6.46076e-7,0.0035215432,7.2275395e-7,0.0000020309037,0.9906105,0.000540993,0.0045058816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039666756,0.000009618358,0.0010309631,0.00084351684,0.000018992774,0.0000012059419,0.00014808966,0.0000015019492,0.000032258544,0.0010937998,0.99671715,0.00006323648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013391408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06011657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023773675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021352935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3147890403","doi":"10.29173/mlj1262","title":"Hryniak Comes to Manitoba: The Evolution of Manitoba Civil Procedure in the 2010s","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Queen (butterfly); Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.025582168611723962,"score_gpt":0.2875323233228425,"score_spread":0.26195015471111854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3147890403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85327774,0.00087842444,0.00042906485,0.049759198,0.0006942674,0.00074592646,0.000022255525,0.0000344741,0.09415863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973256,0.00010397366,0.0001725931,0.0012063032,0.0010262795,0.000037856946,0.0000019286197,0.000011400097,0.000114056864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797386,0.0004000173,0.0003767824,0.00018369503,0.00068964076,0.00037600653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989034,0.00019503685,0.0001736429,0.00031742928,0.0003057512,0.00010474426],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014042731,0.0001241094,0.0001664397,0.000052504525,0.0016313586,0.00033164807,0.00085343816,0.00008365835,0.00008308011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017124685,0.00007849931,0.00011947595,0.000669107,0.00023357778,0.00021989431,0.000118071,0.0005125551,0.00007439466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024163071,0.00034416656,0.027391756,0.00002878662,0.00004795197,0.000058961352,0.010762411,0.00018904876,0.00056856824,0.93657553,0.018452477,0.0055561475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035785665,0.00004853178,0.11004991,0.00008406651,0.000046458197,0.00014686733,0.47552466,0.000026211845,0.00015703912,0.03025797,0.3830979,0.00020251512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06459085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9599773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9063176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041019436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003359758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148448447","doi":"","title":"Class Action Value","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Proposition; Compensation (psychology); Value (mathematics); Action (physics); Mechanism (biology); Collective action; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.02529082027929083,"score_gpt":0.3466617663063745,"score_spread":0.3213709460270837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148448447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5732488,0.00058780593,0.0314759,0.031158162,0.00100884,0.00027249331,0.0000020584416,0.00016173559,0.3620842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98699796,0.0012380477,0.000067358036,0.00017290514,0.0022852402,0.0000029809644,4.506166e-7,0.000006494907,0.009228582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836665,0.000078268065,0.00010368157,0.000091400805,0.0002111429,0.0011488359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996605,0.000020660944,0.000069957925,0.00008151228,0.0000916001,0.000075772325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013594296,0.00004741744,0.00005079374,0.000032883556,0.0011184757,0.00007963876,0.00020737408,0.00005239274,0.00010929833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005077619,0.000042765132,0.00005042296,0.00017620233,0.00013660152,0.00019136663,0.000014879172,0.0006559269,0.00026910388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004387354,0.000015001256,0.0001784197,2.3531129e-7,0.000013053386,1.0240431e-7,0.0005624177,0.0000015280302,0.00023066904,0.9796855,0.00038179572,0.018926885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107594584,0.00007000848,0.0003233772,0.0000022311247,0.000009172265,0.000015889193,0.0042931237,0.000035711688,0.0000957561,0.3940588,0.6009247,0.00006370071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094219315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015171743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60054284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007943196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020223362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86025244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149062924","doi":"","title":"Contract Damages, Moral Agency, and Henry James’ The Ambassadors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Moral agency; Financial compensation; Agency cost; Law; Breach of contract; Economics; Business; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01186437919129495,"score_gpt":0.2779666929876836,"score_spread":0.26610231379638866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149062924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476949,0.0028304243,0.00023324128,0.017093886,0.0001583883,0.00026494116,0.0000025545949,0.000028122335,0.03169356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98725617,0.004626056,0.000018784085,0.0003436934,0.00031525912,0.00000466086,8.818873e-7,0.000008598246,0.0074259024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981854,0.00013461459,0.00014283463,0.00012638912,0.0002496654,0.001161114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995398,0.00008488109,0.0001006061,0.00013968635,0.000048899,0.00008610896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019939782,0.00007848587,0.00009712394,0.000024890336,0.00075811625,0.00015588304,0.00032291753,0.000054450644,0.00013168225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043615684,0.000053180032,0.00006294185,0.00013466958,0.00013975019,0.00021352714,0.000036030695,0.0010963336,0.000081186336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067123015,0.000019313804,0.009605287,9.824005e-7,0.000032329608,7.114737e-7,0.0016652286,0.000006993919,0.00012721175,0.9705397,0.00024512946,0.017750394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008084186,0.0001673257,0.04309435,0.00001519619,0.00005664857,0.000098729426,0.0195071,0.00018437467,0.000022812545,0.5081406,0.42758963,0.0003147856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023166784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004500477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46239907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002735981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013741981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5830894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149520621","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249.004","title":"The Biggest Legal Mind We Have","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Cabinet (room); Jurisprudence; Politics; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04032835336190529,"score_gpt":0.24426550029503544,"score_spread":0.20393714693313014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149520621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014868026,0.00021517853,0.00006246588,0.0030335533,0.00016805873,0.00043049376,0.00023012416,0.000072288996,0.99577296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040012156,0.0005383405,0.000029677143,0.00009814051,0.0004953481,0.0000011638863,0.000015244174,0.000023518556,0.99479735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998797,0.00005241726,0.00013971938,0.00037597964,0.00035653447,0.00027837537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891794,0.00015165353,0.00017356708,0.00038542013,0.00012116126,0.00025025953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013695177,0.00020814312,0.0001988644,0.000037624763,0.001646606,0.00020456,0.0008937691,0.00026170103,0.0000095418445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019498848,0.00019782483,0.00020148412,0.000009961847,0.00079485576,0.0000814557,0.00034372517,0.0004955909,0.00009154529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015352973,0.0000030069655,4.298501e-7,0.0000065659387,0.00004387633,0.0000468707,0.00032464825,4.3021808e-7,0.0000041546073,0.94495517,0.051032893,0.0035666279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013149536,0.000012797658,0.0000027452054,0.000029323042,0.00009201544,0.0000010897287,0.00057706557,0.000016535027,0.000028766768,0.0000343457,0.998839,0.00023478172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017332208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039491765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9478061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019864205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036289752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150515959","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.191","title":"PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC RIGHT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Private law; Law; Tort; Unjust enrichment; Public law; Public interest; Political science; Economic Justice; Exclusive right; Common law; Commercial law; Liability; Law and economics; Normative; Private rights; Business; Sociology; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.02653600188505005,"score_gpt":0.2331907195830554,"score_spread":0.20665471769800536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150515959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033522338,0.00014742279,0.0003215694,0.0006768405,0.000047410424,0.00004330657,0.0000034356005,0.000013179792,0.9652245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678475,0.0002739386,0.0021003631,0.00006960508,0.000050699677,1.8452797e-8,2.522757e-7,0.0000016742058,0.0007186963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960685,0.000044061853,0.00005234429,0.00005968977,0.00011485211,0.00012220259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996298,0.000011127661,0.000071598515,0.00006342345,0.000069188325,0.00015488609],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018042397,0.0000324486,0.00005937299,0.0000055181936,0.0011431024,0.00003038293,0.00021075369,0.00003598967,0.002199542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004446704,0.000033052595,0.00003477165,0.000015916317,0.00039006872,0.00060891575,0.00005079899,0.00006208979,0.000006386233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004451812,0.000027362265,0.00047746248,9.704557e-7,0.0000110229175,0.000004010748,0.005632473,3.7105576e-8,0.00002048216,0.9931627,0.00019447177,0.0004645623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017228705,0.00001916863,0.002190022,0.0000045345064,0.000012035116,0.000003844001,0.0055038063,0.0000023075086,0.00002338053,0.0073636537,0.98465395,0.000051032224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20731443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46940053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008743726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033112436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152063298","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3637","title":"Equity: Conscience Goes to Market by Irit Samet","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Conscience; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.036901781067282605,"score_gpt":0.3616943035151548,"score_spread":0.3247925224478722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152063298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001944948,0.0003148354,0.0015621487,0.035999306,0.00025307533,0.00009142049,0.000041571173,0.00003347494,0.95975924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786403,0.00022511257,0.0042424523,0.0032228231,0.0003505658,0.000008359526,0.0000022848237,0.000008825151,0.013299244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835163,0.00017130947,0.00022306468,0.0002283502,0.0005693391,0.00045628508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988808,0.00012814536,0.000085558495,0.00019220848,0.0002137099,0.00049959624],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012276322,0.00008849923,0.00013541977,0.000021607913,0.0017979598,0.00072293065,0.0005184729,0.00006257302,0.00239577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027774746,0.000083108345,0.00008291679,0.00035099837,0.0002566461,0.00029614437,0.00021243567,0.0002539592,0.00016227106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035651397,0.000064506356,0.00020687703,0.0000023344576,0.000009558952,0.000020720641,0.00062773185,0.000005947791,0.0022860768,0.9226696,0.06821139,0.005891709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012664002,0.000017240545,0.00017653126,0.000020133788,0.000011068212,0.000041527786,0.0013754573,0.000014346037,0.00082180864,0.061036803,0.93622124,0.00013719805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013907808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113751896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97669536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013462237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035451946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152461280","doi":"","title":"Intention, Recklessness and Misfeasance in Public Office","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Recklessness; Tort; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Harm; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.01575088365514697,"score_gpt":0.29165534759628897,"score_spread":0.275904463941142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152461280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704354,0.00045657624,0.0010097653,0.012443085,0.00017568521,0.00010399487,7.645865e-7,0.000022361513,0.015352402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957706,0.0020629447,0.0000710672,0.000063259366,0.00020987034,0.0000068765085,6.836774e-7,0.0000057752964,0.0018089662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985199,0.000063984604,0.00014617722,0.00012024261,0.00015580896,0.0009938913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961793,0.000036699632,0.00007171729,0.0000839466,0.00009654198,0.00009318866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021146943,0.00005421656,0.00007312199,0.00006307099,0.00044315695,0.00013898074,0.00023137148,0.00006440798,0.00004609357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019793093,0.000050743067,0.00002755168,0.00026182184,0.00013361225,0.000290348,0.000024231811,0.0014131068,0.000015563166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036841843,0.000030296887,0.010464402,8.673617e-7,0.000005107377,3.424886e-7,0.00047453708,2.619584e-7,0.0003744029,0.968615,0.000023715626,0.020007372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005647075,0.00003787433,0.035236627,0.000013014061,0.000008880338,0.000068574445,0.013190697,0.00003884309,0.000027379316,0.575064,0.37553328,0.00021611828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012328973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1707301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39355102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019704188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014435275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8444019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153162905","doi":"","title":"Discrimination and the Private Law in Canada: Reflections on Spence v. BMO Trust Co.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Political science; Legislation; Testamentary trust; Public law; Sexual orientation; Conflict of laws; Private law; Choice of law; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01820394833459508,"score_gpt":0.3092328237729929,"score_spread":0.2910288754383978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153162905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8624593,0.00020471345,0.00012830764,0.024863726,0.00011645412,0.00031480513,0.0000021512371,0.000008382021,0.111902155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647945,0.0011871166,0.000008061171,0.00031213323,0.00009170992,0.000007776987,7.7419224e-7,0.0000042538395,0.0019087223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987935,0.00011755324,0.00012572833,0.00010017967,0.00021934973,0.00064370036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996926,0.00008605494,0.00007164637,0.00008610073,0.00002320928,0.00004036366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011850601,0.000051632684,0.000074140306,0.000024071487,0.00054984295,0.00006437824,0.00017549211,0.000022668815,0.0000281243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003635848,0.000035703924,0.000021343827,0.00015066024,0.000105212726,0.00012906927,0.000013335487,0.0007112039,0.000013129508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001452597,0.000008130356,0.0019872168,6.323361e-7,0.000005277437,1.8382798e-7,0.0009238949,0.000022081944,0.00002411599,0.9959925,0.000017482946,0.0010039932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011646255,0.00007042278,0.01765045,0.000021581842,0.000014558759,0.000021713397,0.021085083,0.00015335056,0.000040411574,0.8678873,0.091732055,0.0001584282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75148904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99372923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2422402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018105699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031454272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5579853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154155133","doi":"","title":"THE MANDATE AND THE TRUST","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Faculty of Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Mandate; Political science; Legislature; Romanian; Public administration; Commercial law","score_opus":0.1586390443506639,"score_gpt":0.3630342555713076,"score_spread":0.2043952112206437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154155133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.754751,0.00013706835,0.000009420121,0.22277305,0.000014825612,0.00011809172,0.000061976796,0.0000041788526,0.022130378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964054,0.0022088266,0.00004391263,0.00102068,0.000052594227,0.00000336383,0.0000019971333,0.0000017790956,0.00026140356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969375,0.000021524676,0.00013149323,0.000056735847,0.000025387813,0.00007110874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964154,0.00010612235,0.00010487884,0.00007196854,0.000038133745,0.0000373699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036414736,0.000027736136,0.000079518504,0.0000027442604,0.00024101489,0.00003042979,0.00019803646,0.000017467275,0.000010752416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007915714,0.0000161947,0.000044334334,0.00002907662,0.0004988069,0.000053631888,0.000041931304,0.000032905402,0.0000051996976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027613136,0.0000049314513,0.00033452004,0.0000030853842,0.000021146428,1.4471679e-8,0.007089819,0.000048791033,0.0000057244265,0.9819221,0.0037572528,0.0067849876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021087666,0.000012014027,0.002033267,0.0000015263394,0.000005594215,4.6349488e-8,0.002774877,0.00059167383,0.00035615702,0.016392289,0.9775872,0.000034473112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007042024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044202543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000015838853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029587634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18537161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154178843","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3309910","title":"Equitable Remedies for Contractual Breach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Business; Law; Damages; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029154402873013158,"score_gpt":0.34061500465511696,"score_spread":0.3114606017821038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154178843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42711765,0.035652433,0.18969552,0.06136061,0.0028421944,0.0022895567,0.000047991845,0.00037307094,0.28062096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98569643,0.0014477369,0.00020654929,0.00014086049,0.0021800806,0.00002407435,0.0000022735812,0.00000971527,0.010292269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967658,0.000045371522,0.00014517744,0.0000736295,0.00020020799,0.0027697973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994896,0.00012263568,0.00008529781,0.00007222892,0.000090991845,0.00013921216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003657488,0.000063515945,0.00009242612,0.000028098284,0.0011073139,0.0000688407,0.00021307378,0.000056540954,0.00005168063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018976103,0.000054979126,0.00007935454,0.000087511726,0.00007677683,0.00038593376,0.000020373076,0.0005290087,0.00003814497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008684525,0.00004276156,0.00061351666,0.0000010128696,0.000028466318,3.1572878e-8,0.0017342118,9.13203e-7,0.00019206389,0.9854116,0.001096568,0.0108702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003043111,0.00005282102,0.00021481999,0.000003397223,0.000027624848,0.000018416042,0.013217816,0.000006990661,0.000072766445,0.2074572,0.77851915,0.000104647224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004231503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003221361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77795434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005692154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013962483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85166746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155053350","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1406","title":"Games of Jurisdiction: How Local Governance Realities Challenge the “Creatures of the Province” Doctrine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Citizenship; Political science; Local government; Politics; Democracy; Law; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Public administration; Corporate governance; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.0191491250447018,"score_gpt":0.30860168624758355,"score_spread":0.28945256120288176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155053350","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14323397,0.003966129,0.000083519466,0.6046121,0.0002692156,0.00022861303,0.00011011425,0.000009923872,0.24748643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99363875,0.0021735898,0.000015314527,0.00040544182,0.0015166303,0.0000013095672,2.1137726e-7,0.0000030861313,0.002245661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999188,0.00013698667,0.00019345451,0.000050936982,0.00032209983,0.00010849278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922615,0.000073290495,0.0003800716,0.000081633196,0.00020693384,0.00003190211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025608667,0.000050392493,0.00015847916,0.0000089497335,0.00045923868,0.00003853617,0.00019236527,0.000060470233,0.000009620861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060505372,0.000028839944,0.00013241897,0.00012595353,0.0008188706,0.000108200176,0.000052294396,0.00016399071,1.01159394e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008422358,0.00003417777,0.00004195008,0.00001677542,0.000024794519,8.9566424e-7,0.010611403,0.0000016271396,0.000053795295,0.9845845,0.0010756827,0.0035459576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002632074,0.000046818637,0.008995301,0.000039910574,0.000042788408,0.000008007793,0.011264705,0.000002008811,0.0009200053,0.029309303,0.9490495,0.00005849128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054479185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045013623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95527524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047748857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000630039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82356596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155689419","doi":"10.21991/cf29416","title":"The Common Good and Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Originalism; Natural law; Witness; Common law; Legal realism; Intelligibility (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Legal profession; Political science; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01283745146986231,"score_gpt":0.29227039320821185,"score_spread":0.27943294173834954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155689419","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22242454,0.0052541518,0.058146756,0.4252296,0.0021645494,0.0021440093,0.000572581,0.00034657898,0.28371724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99337107,0.00021871061,0.00089806656,0.0023644983,0.0001180257,0.0001413248,0.000022467597,0.0000066185075,0.0028592013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979741,0.00024853795,0.00038961213,0.0004529008,0.00039863726,0.00053619134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981251,0.00080364733,0.00009618316,0.00031818807,0.00030300015,0.00035387557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008963755,0.00019628569,0.00021042857,0.00007536629,0.004941185,0.00054886925,0.00025460505,0.00012442649,0.00005782589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010167671,0.00017302002,0.00008527899,0.00040131036,0.004959507,0.00048367365,0.00032345325,0.00023956868,0.00007288282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019067142,0.000037319733,0.004165457,0.000005741016,0.00003222243,0.000025848853,0.00031624112,0.000049838487,0.0002882639,0.9895059,0.0017239904,0.0036585112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005574257,0.00003938673,0.0042463,0.00007719727,0.000031873347,0.0002302399,0.0067207534,0.00024291602,0.00011716922,0.014908852,0.9725579,0.0002699999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029695244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005024105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97459704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017602762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018897563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155948963","doi":"","title":"Effective Remediation in Public Procurement: Contract Damages Versus Judicial Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Procurement; Liability; Principal (computer security); Business; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.03529498335691351,"score_gpt":0.3300951700995676,"score_spread":0.2948001867426541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155948963","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13470003,0.08826227,0.0047065686,0.6834288,0.0009662188,0.0057615116,0.000014390427,0.0002754005,0.081884794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94983834,0.0484672,0.000013562524,0.00077774044,0.0008089344,0.000042754433,0.0000041329845,0.0000076242586,0.000039737777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979879,0.00025650818,0.00023395596,0.0001550115,0.0003092054,0.0010574146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994227,0.00010146943,0.000167451,0.000061747094,0.000113266884,0.00013331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023572491,0.00008120505,0.00015269069,0.00003822,0.0003458773,0.00007578512,0.00025872534,0.000051425166,0.00005915092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011365204,0.0000757699,0.000066594344,0.0004763565,0.000053969037,0.00034914693,0.000021709691,0.0010762644,0.000045112098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000624884,0.0000669435,0.0013638911,0.000028465927,0.00005418381,0.0000018774087,0.0016516334,0.0000032492928,0.00010702816,0.9198034,0.0005108605,0.076346025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053858785,0.0010850545,0.008332644,0.00038971967,0.00018899563,0.00001032106,0.0067627183,0.00016128737,0.00007881388,0.12763973,0.8492906,0.00067423756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003897406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012944109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84877974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000976775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023357836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7223117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156449470","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttaa095","title":"Parent fiduciary breach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.09019037692478345,"score_gpt":0.34451523927185185,"score_spread":0.2543248623470684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156449470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38760158,0.00048846746,0.0003696079,0.0854174,0.0002849574,0.00061751594,0.00004353481,0.0006083326,0.5245686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504346,0.00007636882,0.000333616,0.0018472102,0.0007254781,0.00003083205,0.000008102268,0.000011690651,0.0019232593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989719,0.000069880894,0.00016328649,0.00023965111,0.00027796868,0.00027730933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944246,0.000058544218,0.000052016923,0.0001595557,0.000040295563,0.00024714746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016114865,0.000092577175,0.00012614785,0.000017310587,0.00042966288,0.00008851463,0.00033680117,0.00006740697,0.001141073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008602892,0.000086661676,0.0000720799,0.00020265176,0.00012678772,0.00014788932,0.00006545508,0.00013289311,0.0005857654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038518014,0.00021218332,0.02543378,0.000044150907,0.00005738532,0.0000167491,0.07899408,0.000103506136,0.00047003172,0.7324825,0.06962482,0.09252227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016764483,0.00002119922,0.011022099,0.0000056248996,0.00001633214,4.6904546e-7,0.0033335893,0.000114141134,0.00009092734,0.0014572907,0.9836159,0.0001548189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011402646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004619665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91399103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042856784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012326652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157412786","doi":"","title":"Scottish Law on Intestacy and Probate: Borrowing From the United States and Canada to Bring Scottish Law Out of Flux","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Probate; Legislation; Law; Common law; Property (philosophy); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.012496208620902293,"score_gpt":0.2273973172427538,"score_spread":0.21490110862185152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157412786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397701,0.000023549117,0.000093111375,0.0029915003,0.0000637515,0.00050368713,0.00008331573,0.00007708863,0.056393918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955656,0.000054421467,0.00046875316,0.00087076705,0.000025290867,4.5566156e-7,0.00001906281,0.000009681768,0.002985982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907595,0.00007417713,0.00011148744,0.00026131456,0.0002493201,0.00022776879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919444,0.0002621364,0.000070656795,0.00025067525,0.00009481405,0.00012729997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022587948,0.00010735362,0.00014746284,0.000067236426,0.00043146947,0.000097244825,0.00041206213,0.00006536615,0.00003555789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003693492,0.00010024625,0.000020769803,0.00040743558,0.00025190294,0.00021642174,0.0002518722,0.00020213159,0.000011770933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029489272,0.000035635236,0.009555314,0.000021600887,0.00004378738,0.000013467574,0.0056931535,0.00006170016,0.0010620998,0.9812246,0.001479296,0.00077988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043924895,0.00008199608,0.003753997,0.00023224544,0.00004408151,5.5322937e-7,0.009310932,0.000067134504,0.0036966577,0.003836526,0.97824794,0.00028867088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94067335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9268879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.977388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017836603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021016409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40879235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157495850","doi":"","title":"The Common Good and Legal Interpretation: A Response to Leonid Sirota and Mark Mancini","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Originalism; Natural law; Legal realism; Political science; Common law; Sociology; Legal profession; Constitutional law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007177752051754811,"score_gpt":0.2913306774655743,"score_spread":0.2841529254138195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157495850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9026106,0.0037783927,0.0010998037,0.08297782,0.00009251181,0.00016107145,0.0000025039665,0.000017495271,0.009259784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878347,0.0026954655,0.000068795336,0.00035435727,0.00015257126,0.000009875306,4.0335308e-7,0.000006385087,0.008877469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846995,0.00031627555,0.00014923945,0.00013329,0.00018394041,0.0007473296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936855,0.00027332857,0.000055477325,0.000112610935,0.000071013026,0.00011901251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024767308,0.000064823354,0.0000819383,0.000022042206,0.0013396895,0.00037052995,0.00013233355,0.000036030102,0.000010294953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002108129,0.00005028999,0.000032072483,0.0001684368,0.00010471975,0.00013965843,0.00006988786,0.0005952884,0.0000081625285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021736616,0.00001856159,0.00082779786,0.0000013879065,0.000035581816,0.000007997784,0.002412093,0.000002868229,0.00047847978,0.9509918,0.0001452014,0.04486083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004679815,0.00022519194,0.012737427,0.000025622401,0.000031790267,0.0005398442,0.029164294,0.000079673715,0.000082654595,0.12384537,0.8326147,0.00018542986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002597311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029635523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8324695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025967933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015222157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157619134","doi":"","title":"Married Couple, Single Recipient: Understanding the Exclusion of Gifts and Inheritances from Default Matrimonial Regimes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0841584033312976,"score_gpt":0.29756465331942483,"score_spread":0.21340624998812724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157619134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93358016,0.0013880008,0.00056563196,0.0043540807,0.00047269007,0.000117504096,0.000046975587,0.000004903802,0.059470024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868506,0.00008524652,0.00032197233,0.0003512163,0.00043693196,6.4517644e-7,7.632433e-7,0.000006143395,0.00011203596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992505,0.000067520785,0.00023015535,0.00008427441,0.00018009913,0.00018747665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911994,0.0001287014,0.00022411639,0.0001039261,0.0001505611,0.00027274247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004259832,0.000060819326,0.0001255125,0.000045793004,0.0009118229,0.00011111988,0.0002572669,0.000060208902,0.0000494451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007329496,0.00004581475,0.00004267492,0.00018080759,0.0010352195,0.0001721648,0.000017020875,0.00010503842,0.0000023252198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000711387,0.000024457955,0.0047121835,0.000008037068,0.00006629091,0.000021126376,0.03257896,0.00001117539,0.005398427,0.9463788,0.008012443,0.002716911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077759573,0.00031575921,0.0149317,0.0002799321,0.0000873228,0.000009608927,0.054712906,0.000064877066,0.0006591631,0.13823009,0.7896542,0.000276885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12500362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50119275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80814874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020019081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057175773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8808231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158511735","doi":"","title":"Disability and Contractual Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Morality; Realm; Economic Justice; Social contract; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Intellectual disability; Politics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology; Duty","score_opus":0.012656126676289542,"score_gpt":0.3098059944890744,"score_spread":0.29714986781278485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158511735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95433396,0.002454923,0.002414677,0.023344865,0.00008679693,0.00009007514,0.0000040213704,0.00003126621,0.017239444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960942,0.001660161,0.000084014464,0.00006657293,0.00028083043,0.000004811763,0.0000015459158,0.0000036360248,0.0018041943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988124,0.00009462392,0.000109027525,0.00010250116,0.00013994545,0.00074153347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963367,0.00009474953,0.000039524963,0.00007085676,0.000077106924,0.00008408035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061158807,0.000041095536,0.000061555176,0.0000077834065,0.00076294,0.00009819417,0.0000791437,0.000032784435,0.00007983826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018346091,0.000038866332,0.000038852348,0.00011310846,0.00018071002,0.00014830858,0.000016732836,0.0005134372,0.000013241782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018933324,0.00005085456,0.0038239646,4.418887e-7,0.000015505138,6.402553e-7,0.0018833318,9.034003e-7,0.00008140027,0.9836938,0.000031086773,0.0104162125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004317429,0.000037983827,0.016018279,0.000004642004,0.000031293428,0.00009709774,0.12095384,0.000020170488,0.00007394402,0.75080013,0.111368075,0.00016279033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029808198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020129435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23289363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003441606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018227851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99775064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159075066","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/x82yh","title":"Crime and Punishment: Adam Smith’s Theory of Sentimental Law and Economics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Punishment (psychology); Rational choice theory (criminology); Sanctions; Adam smith; Unintended consequences; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Public good; Feeling; Economics; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.03058037262613684,"score_gpt":0.2727778915553184,"score_spread":0.24219751892918157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159075066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26542583,0.00013770653,0.00010893861,0.0069939685,0.00001539601,0.00014246647,0.000015443682,0.000023199482,0.727137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976242,0.00012947772,0.00032171296,0.001242477,0.00003655497,0.0000022013576,8.006856e-7,0.0000022442066,0.0006403353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997347,0.000019345422,0.000067251225,0.000086171196,0.000030859606,0.00006165807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998228,0.00003295349,0.000022943046,0.000037042344,0.000007452862,0.0000768356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001034066,0.0000294572,0.000052557007,0.0000039040124,0.00012673593,0.000033247485,0.000049101374,0.000018572982,0.00012824728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000051410593,0.000026879368,0.000011779806,0.000022865242,0.00020595882,0.000086172746,0.000054538632,0.000023687437,0.00000572755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025074544,0.000008182985,0.00031521005,0.0000033785661,0.0000054176576,5.979542e-8,0.0022639057,3.5555533e-7,0.00010144871,0.99642116,0.00016601678,0.0007123709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006037384,0.00007524805,0.005904627,0.0000072249313,0.000043998203,8.4446447e-7,0.026034763,0.00043804984,0.005360094,0.07498375,0.8863079,0.00023976329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006816093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013361503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9214374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006864065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020304255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14042178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159133818","doi":"","title":"Australia's 'Take' on Possession and Purchase Money Security Interest Priority Under the PPSA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Legislation; Statutory law; Personal property; Security interest; Law; Business; Property (philosophy); Political science","score_opus":0.058187437586224355,"score_gpt":0.35003873988471323,"score_spread":0.2918513022984889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159133818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8929406,0.00028951478,0.0005811866,0.104300365,0.00006572843,0.000172113,0.0000042782804,0.000028218055,0.0016179853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702203,0.0012363861,0.000009459912,0.00072849466,0.0005323467,0.000003826368,0.0000010867869,0.0000070024307,0.00045937567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984097,0.0001539627,0.00015218667,0.0001660056,0.0002356299,0.0008825154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950624,0.000060428913,0.00009574497,0.00010224923,0.000046072542,0.00018927694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010024513,0.00009199444,0.000092536146,0.000016689066,0.0009864026,0.00017915767,0.00030513428,0.00006657084,0.000050647912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078468816,0.000061973486,0.000058400314,0.00016569596,0.00016336133,0.00015388816,0.0000554161,0.0015980132,0.000035598157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002776887,0.000044410415,0.00046761357,0.0000019947674,0.000023074925,0.0000012348477,0.0029657402,0.000007751417,0.0003058125,0.9931743,0.0002866908,0.0026936147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008335611,0.0004912456,0.0043306123,0.000030329877,0.00005763003,0.00004605848,0.035320774,0.00012230418,0.00032353713,0.79071105,0.16740227,0.000330618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007839215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004356069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20246322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029862308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007655894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75867116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160179949","doi":"10.29173/mlj1161","title":"Introduction from the Manitoba Law Journal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03845436528131245,"score_gpt":0.27267531204167483,"score_spread":0.23422094676036237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160179949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27259696,0.0006982294,0.0027814098,0.6132801,0.0040462036,0.000446085,0.000040072133,0.00016072163,0.10595024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512915,0.00020618801,0.0005269295,0.005314443,0.04260368,0.00000433081,0.0000038819517,0.000017250315,0.00003179416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820584,0.00030410755,0.0003498776,0.0001856096,0.0006057497,0.00034882766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892753,0.00010796969,0.00024422878,0.0001695515,0.00019908935,0.0003516422],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007633461,0.00012502799,0.00014380786,0.000012835069,0.005732869,0.001295699,0.00074120134,0.00007914401,0.0009009311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010888866,0.00008871978,0.00015029495,0.00019574893,0.0003335754,0.0005435016,0.000086399035,0.00097014394,0.0004584438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036671532,0.00006672357,0.0008395142,0.0000022833626,0.00008949222,0.000038705028,0.0054357923,0.000083147046,0.0004415466,0.873905,0.09509358,0.023967573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021477294,0.000031853655,0.0006870936,0.0000072116177,0.000040725452,0.000061965664,0.06791045,0.000022173452,0.00010309048,0.01909642,0.91170913,0.0001151087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07407673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5087457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85480857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017966439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008360896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160186883","doi":"","title":"Has the Golden Age of Fraud Passed","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diligence; Position (finance); Law; Due diligence; Aside; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01836855299632907,"score_gpt":0.2837761312094594,"score_spread":0.2654075782131303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160186883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8814902,0.0010813812,0.0018580111,0.025276981,0.00022024737,0.0003505852,0.000002575386,0.000027905166,0.08969213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888721,0.0007474106,0.00002087822,0.000102002836,0.0002466865,0.0000031537522,7.6972555e-7,0.0000058702913,0.010001102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858266,0.00009009777,0.00014415076,0.000076911965,0.0002606695,0.00084552297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995755,0.00007080787,0.00011470688,0.00014515826,0.000052670915,0.000041168394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015786954,0.00004911829,0.00008429049,0.000020996848,0.0004341343,0.000075807715,0.00043453678,0.000042523883,0.00013983046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037655573,0.00003245259,0.00008347869,0.00016773706,0.00012604096,0.0000961018,0.000025565932,0.00070998183,0.000103433296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003885457,0.000020729585,0.0018663678,9.774187e-7,0.000028088753,2.3564715e-7,0.0016649408,0.000010433503,0.00088052097,0.9922403,0.00020683276,0.0030766886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031473037,0.00008511144,0.003646701,0.000008559298,0.000021537548,0.000009332409,0.012356508,0.000019412852,0.00009748129,0.3836751,0.59966516,0.00010035659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012519481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068649203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6085652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024059291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018134025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38307866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163508843","doi":"10.1017/9781108348683","title":"Sanctity of Contracts in a Secular Age","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Phrase; Disadvantaged; Power (physics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024584012248432992,"score_gpt":0.242904608355766,"score_spread":0.218320596107333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163508843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017678643,0.00006562346,0.00006448731,0.000023779985,0.00010204355,0.00062278006,0.00017805891,0.00003550502,0.9971399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03794814,0.00007254845,0.000026304928,0.000033689805,0.00008051484,9.069155e-7,0.000028169055,0.000011945021,0.9617978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897784,0.000102247126,0.00015098418,0.00027289396,0.00026543599,0.00023060472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991491,0.00010093294,0.00020274278,0.0003452222,0.00010239775,0.00009963311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002209109,0.0001371963,0.00032313948,0.000101177284,0.00012895076,0.000024095967,0.00050043454,0.00031793583,0.000004832747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026037464,0.0001720924,0.00013930342,0.000024937628,0.00033755664,0.00007780438,0.00016557674,0.00034336894,0.000012349218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018827715,0.000021204145,0.000018492918,0.00005443557,0.000027337313,0.00007053177,0.0005754501,0.000004590272,0.000039720624,0.9714087,0.027618576,0.00014207853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035539456,0.000010577765,0.00021102048,0.00008944329,0.000046498702,3.4157566e-7,0.00019128103,0.0000066018856,0.000044635006,0.000022718219,0.9988494,0.00017210527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006438592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000866391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.971386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004055264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075245067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9733268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163736284","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab017","title":"The Fideicommissary Substitution and the Fiducia: Québécois Echoes in the Civil Code of Romania","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Civil code; Romanian; Fiduciary; Code (set theory); Substitution (logic); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017165787486584323,"score_gpt":0.290349273179765,"score_spread":0.2731834856931807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163736284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8006312,0.0055202683,0.000032537566,0.06661028,0.00015697254,0.0005839908,0.000022328231,0.000037194324,0.12640518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718195,0.0013373683,0.000030090696,0.00036859122,0.000110513385,0.000050922332,0.0000026232474,0.000004665286,0.00091327116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874187,0.00041715786,0.0002217522,0.00015068057,0.00027691876,0.00019161848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984884,0.0009910307,0.0000904,0.00033656345,0.000064579464,0.000028976421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012852353,0.00007927292,0.00012958754,0.000015386062,0.0009978808,0.00013599492,0.00043082962,0.000057951416,0.000048920803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031829806,0.000038726772,0.0000609797,0.00028081305,0.0008482288,0.000086853455,0.00007089513,0.0001749263,0.0000062726253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016523902,0.000032128795,0.002270269,0.000006729723,0.000012009428,0.0000022775132,0.022534613,0.000013058235,0.000043597436,0.9710503,0.0008768272,0.0031416446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076571346,0.000013834169,0.08293982,0.00003348705,0.00005419629,0.000006984105,0.04624239,0.0001737051,0.0002716472,0.035127692,0.8342349,0.00013562884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02002783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35752356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9359226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031148254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021636297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163911603","doi":"","title":"The Impact of the Honour of the Crown on the Ethical Obligations of Government Lawyers: A Duty of Honourable Dealing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Duty; Obligation; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; Humanities; Government (linguistics); Negotiation; Indigenous; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026089762258675642,"score_gpt":0.3156120197443843,"score_spread":0.28952225748570865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163911603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424473,0.000054257078,0.000030808216,0.01690965,0.00010581623,0.00050294853,0.00011914452,0.000007982879,0.039822087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988097,0.00003495202,0.00005887684,0.0002592782,0.000117982636,0.00002335155,3.2648086e-7,0.0000072511125,0.0006882869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817693,0.00040668086,0.0003626249,0.00012907865,0.0007099975,0.00021467797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776644,0.00084583514,0.0004572358,0.00066972856,0.00020152777,0.000059254347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001737231,0.00009034025,0.00015499798,0.0000064886244,0.0012727018,0.000044158194,0.0009948815,0.00011089852,0.00011963038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008384413,0.00003783712,0.00027182692,0.00041089713,0.0015789716,0.000064405285,0.0001665385,0.0004193677,0.000008610796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024720433,0.00009117377,0.0039264327,0.0000072182274,0.000055777877,2.4885374e-8,0.003064676,0.00024893088,0.0064931237,0.98421025,0.0017425966,0.00013509112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014728538,0.00068542117,0.34827736,0.0009136563,0.00027694393,0.0000024739518,0.029906133,0.0010948709,0.29573712,0.1403902,0.18064922,0.0005937422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021384878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010437702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84382004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011874215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032400817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164302818","doi":"","title":"Parent Fiduciary Breach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.019112377298965443,"score_gpt":0.31568495386710493,"score_spread":0.2965725765681395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164302818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.561483,0.015150022,0.014077126,0.079920344,0.0008962018,0.00028430286,0.0000105025065,0.00017433481,0.32800415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793379,0.0058700144,0.000079402605,0.00023009887,0.0007238585,0.0000045506094,0.0000032962455,0.0000071337513,0.013743803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980954,0.000111231864,0.00013335992,0.00012217794,0.00024838027,0.0012894374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995931,0.00003352886,0.00005663332,0.00011283176,0.00010651559,0.00009743134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011206673,0.000055283992,0.0000738025,0.00002049417,0.0007545205,0.0000991679,0.0002033388,0.000045635723,0.00020115108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007482814,0.000052403288,0.00008174214,0.00020163046,0.000049336417,0.00012233111,0.00003092989,0.0008483819,0.00008985445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016796388,0.00004725611,0.0012185395,5.994599e-7,0.000025205873,0.0000034415723,0.0008070635,0.000005084763,0.00010572643,0.9724072,0.0005546179,0.024823582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016106396,0.000019498777,0.0012195216,0.0000057209945,0.000016620195,0.00009592919,0.011581881,0.0000073621936,0.00005313239,0.40920928,0.5775221,0.00010788621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005629045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013019014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5769675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006272621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005365075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9517413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164410430","doi":"","title":"The End of Fiduciary Accountability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Jurisprudence; Accountability; Fiduciary; Law and economics; Convention; Political science; License; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.020258800203283387,"score_gpt":0.30729702004541215,"score_spread":0.28703821984212874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164410430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7205733,0.0051477896,0.0033657476,0.19644287,0.00023489395,0.00041519597,0.000010104087,0.00006050499,0.073749565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963619,0.0027055088,0.000016301177,0.0001738375,0.00039108557,0.000002504654,2.8469276e-7,0.0000035223222,0.00034503115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870145,0.00009245882,0.00015495012,0.00007522471,0.00023163289,0.00074426515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957263,0.00011015746,0.000096299074,0.00008446722,0.00006957051,0.00006685219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001850549,0.00003928241,0.00006191604,0.0000060766065,0.0007647682,0.00004587499,0.0003686358,0.000028411234,0.000051939962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017890804,0.000026812455,0.0000669164,0.00015733614,0.00020458852,0.00010048848,0.000028553995,0.00065499346,0.000016906646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009767408,0.000013816651,0.0010726211,9.2520935e-7,0.000018482338,6.5433234e-8,0.0020602795,0.0000041232665,0.0001378979,0.97415936,0.00018642253,0.022336265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016068394,0.00007293422,0.0017443955,0.0000024341332,0.000016508195,0.0000040682958,0.022051912,0.00003195004,0.00011535612,0.44585326,0.52986604,0.00008043086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007990404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075471415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52967966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002296331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024792613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5882056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164632338","doi":"","title":"Collective Best Interests in Strata Collective Sales","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Commonwealth; Political science; Duty; State (computer science); Position (finance); Law; Milestone; Public administration; Unanimity; Economics; Geography; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.01926992818591446,"score_gpt":0.3143838962324155,"score_spread":0.2951139680465011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164632338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8778137,0.0005791121,0.0002910049,0.002183754,0.00015861489,0.0004588872,0.0000062373624,0.000022490089,0.11848622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95808554,0.0007312764,0.00002942334,0.00005057257,0.00017969428,0.0000152066,0.0000016948644,0.000011364625,0.04089525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977215,0.00017218848,0.00020786829,0.00019978703,0.00025568908,0.0014430004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945843,0.00011905846,0.00011143521,0.00011735232,0.00010783929,0.00008585647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012731319,0.00010087817,0.00015365826,0.00012734102,0.0004419519,0.00011863051,0.00037089555,0.00008447476,0.00011523424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009513222,0.00009608385,0.00006960066,0.00063689856,0.00009473295,0.00026120845,0.00004077055,0.0012846804,0.0002596411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007022879,0.0002013365,0.028017344,0.0000026165835,0.00007425051,0.000002935407,0.012253166,0.00005055605,0.00027525998,0.95592976,0.00022771656,0.0028948507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016572654,0.0006410942,0.017063204,0.00007200236,0.000027721411,0.00005299278,0.09652207,0.00010319445,0.00007956384,0.84581155,0.037537675,0.00043164677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018328029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13948831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1376555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054085976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016604926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164689926","doi":"","title":"The Public/Private Distinction in Roncarelli v. Duplessis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; State (computer science); Law; Dominion; Discretion; Political science; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Sociology; Liberalism; Law and economics; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.010368530643632343,"score_gpt":0.2851016186733532,"score_spread":0.27473308802972085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164689926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9208936,0.0005460345,0.0028799989,0.052588474,0.00066747976,0.00019410672,0.0000014413536,0.000047676374,0.022181183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99429953,0.0029997379,0.000029710925,0.000041394786,0.0005649805,0.000013998118,0.0000010018236,0.000007710355,0.0020419557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792,0.00009766636,0.00018232153,0.00011271765,0.00025297573,0.0014343238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949574,0.00009940918,0.00010409062,0.00014790263,0.000065759916,0.00008708633],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032345287,0.00006345665,0.0000623132,0.000039837247,0.0016903555,0.0002776733,0.00043810366,0.000068892936,0.000046790123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025878672,0.000044702105,0.000057855974,0.00030229992,0.00016322923,0.00022041898,0.00003306794,0.0019461612,0.000044806362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029420482,0.00001917996,0.0054902025,2.0973863e-7,0.0000068549275,2.6519038e-7,0.00024597833,0.0000015143039,0.0001585847,0.9486301,0.000051637606,0.04539255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014893613,0.000015780835,0.0052025234,0.0000017447227,0.0000045537586,0.000013802635,0.003407494,0.00004895226,0.000013402055,0.3177478,0.6733153,0.00007972336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093832816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21840236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6732636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046969103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016387093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164832298","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529200621.003.0011","title":"Judiciary, Administration, Elections and Miscellaneous Provisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Policy Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Prime minister; Political science; Supreme court; Independence (probability theory); Neutrality; Separation of powers; Administration (probate law); Judicial independence; Constitution of India; Politics","score_opus":0.056019801300788874,"score_gpt":0.327852856692009,"score_spread":0.2718330553912201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164832298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000069736598,0.00020731907,0.000026345417,0.0048763207,0.000049671467,0.00061633805,0.00016099818,0.00016805495,0.99388796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046613477,0.00030018153,0.00011949063,0.0006220421,0.0015614951,0.000070880706,0.000025708474,0.000040630406,0.9506461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988584,0.000029769208,0.00024934037,0.00036391657,0.00025750138,0.00024107333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999122,0.00009183103,0.0001488913,0.00024131712,0.00008324944,0.0003127161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000774547,0.0001970867,0.0002059678,0.00006104898,0.0008166415,0.00018000933,0.00023972064,0.00025183,0.00007496362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007523015,0.0002085406,0.00008221775,0.000011173276,0.0003473649,0.000017793276,0.00010189907,0.00033739267,0.00005601357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042942875,0.0000063160496,6.853671e-7,0.0000124509925,0.000024695473,0.000005112538,0.0010145503,3.3491128e-7,0.00001144339,0.98362666,0.012716162,0.002577312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005949733,0.000036289424,0.0000050364397,0.000021792179,0.000050650666,0.0000064739843,0.00001978096,0.000007636352,0.00002313599,0.086172886,0.9134018,0.00019504465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014077848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061775423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000660809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007436849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167424012","doi":"10.1017/9781780686288.012","title":"Should Indigenous Property be Relationship Property?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Intersentia eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Political science; Legislature; Geography; Property (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Law; Archaeology; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.13432663516763033,"score_gpt":0.3301311702345714,"score_spread":0.19580453506694107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167424012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025149,0.000047860372,0.00012665763,0.0017205026,0.00048058326,0.0012052816,0.000058765647,0.00023842766,0.9958704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09053856,0.00001447173,0.00016948997,0.0006188533,0.0009830762,0.00008106486,0.00003535882,0.00007461088,0.90748453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801326,0.000057827725,0.0004313831,0.00052661035,0.0005504488,0.00042046807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863905,0.00006652645,0.00026428886,0.000565336,0.00025726785,0.0002075362],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038519342,0.0003122762,0.00028410184,0.0001389429,0.0010217787,0.00024685406,0.00063797156,0.00055017567,0.0022755286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005957219,0.00019815343,0.00024865137,0.000026059746,0.0008753829,0.000100585625,0.0001985975,0.00062191265,0.0017400878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000373044,0.000055303113,0.00012304919,0.000053539236,0.0002274492,0.000032840937,0.066345125,5.701835e-7,0.000068654685,0.8333871,0.08425629,0.015412812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009464565,0.00004475413,0.000011445259,0.00013202686,0.00008704589,0.0000038840762,0.00059082214,0.000003663076,0.00003452779,0.016952572,0.9816849,0.00035969258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024023193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00898107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89742863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025596019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005808737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168310726","doi":"","title":"Equitable Subordination Redux? Section 183 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and Respecting the ‘Legislative Will’ of Parliament”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Equity (law); Supreme court; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.0960582412383128,"score_gpt":0.3509504751165748,"score_spread":0.254892233878262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168310726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99258286,0.00017146501,0.00014110922,0.0014899712,0.00010318049,0.00023145787,0.000012082782,0.000017929358,0.005249939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959531,0.00020279984,0.000020323707,0.000039216782,0.00006244047,9.893431e-7,0.000001860662,0.0000070050323,0.003712302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876225,0.00037452922,0.00016293387,0.00023166835,0.00027644495,0.00019215568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990412,0.00018966138,0.0002464432,0.00024432346,0.00022098425,0.000057388537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006393074,0.0000913431,0.00013627327,0.00006885196,0.0007973722,0.000118066455,0.000273737,0.00008608069,0.000011372565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015688174,0.000074066316,0.000054811357,0.00062206667,0.00032802092,0.0009987819,0.00032711742,0.00024519974,7.826732e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016237715,0.000041015464,0.9733433,0.000023674034,0.00003103731,0.0000023548362,0.010710093,0.000010496702,0.004047842,0.010783178,5.259142e-7,0.0009902547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036275436,0.0000391542,0.9736215,0.000116955634,0.00006841863,0.0000039926026,0.008088354,7.370488e-7,0.0053946096,0.0012888131,0.010898647,0.000116060044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021417775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010184303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010898121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010108651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001794351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61328226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169546670","doi":"10.1515/ldr-2021-0046","title":"The Courts and Corporate Executive Compensation in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Law and Development Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Executive compensation; Corporate governance; Corporation; Entitlement (fair division); Corporate law; Bankruptcy; Variety (cybernetics); Corporate title; Law; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Business; Political science; Economics; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.04795818311009499,"score_gpt":0.28162581689084826,"score_spread":0.23366763378075328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169546670","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13956946,0.36535302,0.00008350597,0.2384119,0.00027244122,0.0021720557,0.000010548262,0.000031041043,0.25409603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8329657,0.15826572,0.00017431023,0.0073379176,0.000019630455,0.000051567844,0.0000063093003,0.000002745996,0.001176115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955636,0.00008971484,0.000107683765,0.00006614291,0.00009819797,0.00008192539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997236,0.00010250623,0.000051636187,0.000058595895,0.00003539962,0.00002824628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004661515,0.00003295949,0.00006888915,0.0000013281233,0.0005779484,0.00003782372,0.00005410796,0.0000067800697,0.00001086653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018583274,0.000018245943,0.000004067356,0.000058895697,0.000075542885,0.00002487146,0.00003597704,0.000039948005,0.0000023233756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.30818e-7,0.0000028856,0.0007185339,0.00004192145,0.000004421518,0.000001931572,0.0010162124,2.1460993e-7,0.0000014680113,0.97835,0.0013352046,0.018526675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029795658,4.42637e-7,0.006525075,0.00012803386,0.0000030844392,9.982249e-7,0.0004959733,0.0000017669479,0.000011764143,0.0025036305,0.9902656,0.000033838194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30355346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9560498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006451541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009422736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70108426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170143620","doi":"10.1108/pm-12-2019-0071","title":"On the Property Management Services Ordinance of Hong Kong: concerns and implications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Property Management","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property management; Legislation; Business; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Originality; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Property law; Corporate governance; Common law; Law and economics; Freedom of contract; Property rights; Public administration; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance; Real estate","score_opus":0.04207880207837401,"score_gpt":0.2974578321464861,"score_spread":0.2553790300681121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170143620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025785966,0.00036956897,0.00047027002,0.0705825,0.00008394655,0.0017372849,0.000017494658,0.00008047542,0.90087247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93183786,0.0019163741,0.000684462,0.0010780095,0.000054250075,0.0003523741,0.0000053878125,0.000010633786,0.06406068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989361,0.000083341576,0.00018813633,0.00031616894,0.0002598894,0.00021633196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926883,0.00003845624,0.000084750965,0.00045241223,0.00010025102,0.0000553089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033307943,0.00010083167,0.00011009289,0.000026096503,0.0006194648,0.000117290976,0.0003830535,0.000026274816,0.00013891513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010155438,0.000048595593,0.000040907897,0.00034444503,0.00017039133,0.0001047808,0.00034245627,0.00007149397,0.000041934378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057183547,0.00013198346,0.0006481237,0.00016919844,0.00007374361,0.000003347584,0.0012744428,0.000024938538,0.00008025454,0.9581422,0.005135451,0.034310553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019776718,0.00001946016,0.00986998,0.00011322248,0.00005841887,4.476071e-7,0.005647556,0.00013577395,0.00023039861,0.0061263465,0.9774566,0.00014398427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009005573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064283377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051305768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025603793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4764485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170318723","doi":"","title":"Submission to the Ministry of Justice on Judicial Review: Proposals for Reform – ‘Prospective Invalidation/Overruling’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Political science; Presumption; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Statutory law; Constitution; Common law; Judicial restraint; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.025934942147818975,"score_gpt":0.36207636233310464,"score_spread":0.33614142018528564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170318723","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14731735,0.02680192,0.030476306,0.6033533,0.0019245242,0.0063794656,0.00014555524,0.00012009014,0.18348147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758815,0.015556177,0.00028139798,0.0016270796,0.0011871562,0.00006242559,0.0000078310295,0.000013094611,0.005383342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984671,0.000095657226,0.0002620505,0.00015166333,0.0003512566,0.00067226065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990909,0.000096988115,0.00018212333,0.00015495402,0.0003986893,0.00007634064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022546062,0.00007157961,0.00013712561,0.000020851872,0.0008502343,0.000045368364,0.00027632763,0.00004690895,0.000034105826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088023057,0.000049044058,0.00010349109,0.00031624478,0.000048838723,0.00008203207,0.000032092594,0.00048598053,0.000015595977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042710482,0.00007638198,0.000042593412,0.00004073938,0.000032759555,4.058775e-7,0.0010425561,0.000010942414,0.0004567146,0.98714846,0.0022938221,0.008811937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060070475,0.0005249612,0.0003725899,0.00056389906,0.00030139156,0.000036301808,0.02585121,0.00002224341,0.005806172,0.30637646,0.6592811,0.00026298684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020212028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002253284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82856417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092712557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040314533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71516246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170981047","doi":"10.31009/leap.2020.v8.03","title":"Egalitarianism, Inheritance, and Taxation: On Daniel Halliday’s The Inheritance of Wealth","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Ethics and Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Egalitarianism; Inheritance tax; Economics; Political science; Law; Public economics; Genetics; Biology; International taxation","score_opus":0.08498001117855247,"score_gpt":0.351729106970193,"score_spread":0.2667490957916405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170981047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037927937,0.0020824706,0.00013347047,0.29661247,0.00021266475,0.0002723165,0.00006165393,0.00003124896,0.6626658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248993,0.001439886,0.000390749,0.0048634703,0.00031708862,0.000013860372,0.0000035544151,0.0000065640097,0.0004749132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990779,0.00021538702,0.00015197322,0.0001869253,0.00025100756,0.00011677155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990548,0.00041896693,0.00012094788,0.00019674754,0.00014036591,0.000068197245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075601897,0.000069411755,0.000108890534,0.000006977189,0.0009957047,0.00007498409,0.000114456256,0.00012862825,0.000014456225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016989103,0.000055459415,0.000026416737,0.00016237459,0.0005456013,0.00008078896,0.000047218666,0.00043659305,0.0000023213634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037884292,0.000026121561,0.00016055295,0.000026177577,0.000006819414,9.617949e-7,0.008549012,0.0000020410341,0.00007487148,0.990897,0.000088893,0.00016379058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009824868,0.000021571746,0.0008505094,0.000036934754,0.0000065634563,7.6527067e-7,0.0007312614,0.000007439397,0.000081287275,0.6388131,0.3592874,0.0000649225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013557351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050406493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95456195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012960818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015086026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7658256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171380287","doi":"","title":"Pierringer Settlement Agreements: Proceeding with Eyes Wide Open","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Settlement (finance); Settling; Human settlement; Liability; Compensation (psychology); Law; Business; Joint and several liability; Law and economics; Legal liability; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Finance; Psychology; Payment; Social psychology; Waste management; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.06510914411240587,"score_gpt":0.35793885905732664,"score_spread":0.29282971494492077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171380287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089577615,0.020108083,0.000017011727,0.43497387,0.000060602208,0.0017797109,0.000047356403,0.00001944664,0.54209816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76317376,0.052264664,0.0016509335,0.11129755,0.0006246223,0.0011763627,0.00010563093,0.000059368962,0.069647074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924624,0.0000611756,0.000119295895,0.00014726006,0.0001770932,0.00024894485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993702,0.000019084751,0.00004938162,0.00021648883,0.00011153707,0.00023328276],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064549345,0.00006282655,0.00011490538,0.000010461279,0.0009466834,0.0002265975,0.0005205279,0.000013966188,0.0019524059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008318279,0.00004177639,0.000025778529,0.00029504768,0.000075508644,0.00012239694,0.00007643371,0.00007972291,0.00018440728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.097122e-7,0.000019589803,0.0060531106,0.00028543675,0.00007227417,0.0000140973425,0.0028934972,0.0000016501091,0.0000041421,0.8339293,0.124864474,0.031861622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004372205,0.0000032744138,0.0007943007,0.0006112183,0.00003501321,9.392444e-7,0.0005632718,7.2699487e-7,0.0000046510036,0.00046010446,0.99740905,0.00007371734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17153302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8150708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8725446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022699233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014754602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172131107","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Agency Denied","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Agency (philosophy); Contradiction; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Denial; Business; Accounting; Duty; Economics; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01563847160414158,"score_gpt":0.3057790840919395,"score_spread":0.29014061248779793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172131107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54736125,0.011720002,0.0123613,0.040266912,0.00068162836,0.00022014338,0.000005153746,0.0001357864,0.38724783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96890336,0.006822915,0.00014031581,0.00021534816,0.0007045151,0.0000040334426,0.0000020213738,0.000007838078,0.023199623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806225,0.000117194235,0.00013953964,0.00012286438,0.00023960878,0.0013185532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958223,0.000035014025,0.00006045362,0.00011564044,0.00011079963,0.00009587261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011076428,0.000056071272,0.00007375594,0.000024066621,0.0008557179,0.000093123184,0.00022622253,0.00005158213,0.00032007662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012007237,0.000054672873,0.000088558416,0.00025458547,0.00005057879,0.00014687676,0.000030086147,0.00083701924,0.00013110877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016374099,0.0000328365,0.00041500936,5.64775e-7,0.00002352194,0.000005206914,0.0010017798,0.0000027725698,0.0003308625,0.9782751,0.00032742904,0.019583285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015745734,0.000016894328,0.0009441293,0.000004367018,0.00001700716,0.00007497066,0.0058581345,0.000005483378,0.00013401418,0.6878709,0.30481073,0.000105899395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041074722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01193264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42154214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005251051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006990116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173707194","doi":"","title":"The Devil Is in the Scale: Revisiting the Commonality Requirement in Charter Class Actions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Charter; Normative; Law and economics; Narrative; Redress; Complementarity (molecular biology); Class (philosophy); Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03207756010764312,"score_gpt":0.3388460098549466,"score_spread":0.3067684497473035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173707194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63600564,0.0010858692,0.00010460669,0.321839,0.00010999808,0.00050003774,0.0000020185503,0.0000096059175,0.0403432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950951,0.0021887606,0.0000032297987,0.0010768204,0.00039289225,0.00002573821,5.06997e-7,0.000004660025,0.0012122899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771374,0.0005024667,0.00025842185,0.000112095215,0.00037062122,0.0010426729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992708,0.00029172772,0.00012806106,0.00023935965,0.000043514592,0.000026513682],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008551544,0.00006706398,0.00007893337,0.000020155423,0.0013983792,0.00021526046,0.00067586836,0.000038409253,0.00004595702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048487105,0.00003311907,0.00007273053,0.00034599338,0.000114925526,0.00015345005,0.000038660855,0.0015295513,0.00005131995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065316053,0.0000236752,0.017492723,0.0000013577576,0.000013765268,2.0419724e-7,0.0058376095,0.000008584351,0.000042870666,0.9545706,0.00023957899,0.02176248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002671969,0.000026686352,0.034755792,0.000029370438,0.000012122755,0.000016223994,0.06319365,0.00013033477,0.000007265704,0.12629405,0.7751635,0.00010384731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015715626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058466952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8282766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007497029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008878537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174196727","doi":"","title":"Case Comment: McCain v McCain and Barton v Sauvé : A New Approach to Autonomous Domestic Contractual Bargaining in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.04931912024446239,"score_gpt":0.2837559971035994,"score_spread":0.234436876859137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174196727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8150367,0.00013288383,0.00026190295,0.004201518,0.00015519974,0.00038422886,0.000012674279,0.000005802172,0.17980905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321,0.0000031984928,0.0011695774,0.004283686,0.000098602926,0.0000034410102,0.0000016328961,0.000009536102,0.0012203044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988904,0.000092492475,0.00032092034,0.00015628248,0.00014482526,0.00039506314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998319,0.00015583963,0.00010605432,0.00012927168,0.000060626586,0.0012292279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084819895,0.00010239791,0.00023085227,0.00014821201,0.00029652438,0.00019024668,0.00021779964,0.00008181696,0.000114403236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008557026,0.00010334636,0.000045990775,0.00017578666,0.000106920284,0.00021873768,0.00001619259,0.00036274223,0.000026646967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030443949,0.00006584609,0.01789813,0.000009861412,0.000047164405,0.0016900487,0.09875472,0.0011651076,0.00009458438,0.8688517,0.005852907,0.005539461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011620229,0.000108214954,0.014634946,0.000067263565,0.000025314379,0.0005442396,0.01148147,0.00012416302,0.0000026325217,0.0027324911,0.9688569,0.0002603479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9166377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008125906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039472524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7002256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174920526","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab010","title":"Accountability for authority","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Opportunism; Law and economics; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science; Public administration; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.06286507752607251,"score_gpt":0.3967887501159921,"score_spread":0.33392367258991956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174920526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6624316,0.00042766746,0.0023601726,0.020516146,0.0008214705,0.0010380662,0.00017057675,0.00038853846,0.31184575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98820037,0.000034117948,0.0025342677,0.00025328156,0.00046284925,0.00010439161,0.000014554589,0.0000086851815,0.008387474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901694,0.00007680452,0.00016117767,0.00026100077,0.00020399306,0.00028007664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916714,0.00020711565,0.00004465992,0.00026983913,0.00020068657,0.000110526074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051578943,0.00007568997,0.00012816365,0.000014526069,0.00068810734,0.00012336919,0.00020432795,0.000093185285,0.0008150188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032491906,0.000075480304,0.00010430734,0.00017542232,0.0001435178,0.00017339767,0.00004868305,0.00008937546,0.00006266095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000131955085,0.00016574042,0.0068858378,0.000029380528,0.000017537965,0.0000012913833,0.006178147,0.0000069636176,0.0002958772,0.9584975,0.0045189424,0.023389552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020217891,0.000008483028,0.013140738,0.0000045135816,0.000019349494,5.6147235e-7,0.003567478,0.00004697623,0.00073359755,0.024507266,0.95764434,0.00012453887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010537881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00524071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95312536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009484848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034094023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8923884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174943767","doi":"","title":"Review of Principles of Property Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Property (philosophy); Law; Property law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Property rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0311844596031011,"score_gpt":0.31873781172057414,"score_spread":0.287553352117473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174943767","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01926493,0.31317654,0.0013705835,0.037965633,0.00018864797,0.00056779495,0.000014532572,0.000038866056,0.6274125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70586634,0.2835969,0.00023627447,0.00043349137,0.00015266858,0.0000051953425,0.0000019624663,0.000007308537,0.009699862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986808,0.0001246615,0.00028540034,0.00008231683,0.00023515732,0.00059169956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929386,0.000028912269,0.0001984703,0.0001314453,0.00029964806,0.000047669055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017221982,0.000046631863,0.0001537645,0.000012591305,0.00019178234,0.000011096053,0.00021753443,0.000030539628,0.00011324445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016739192,0.000031872267,0.00010632789,0.00022270682,0.00012941837,0.00008986055,0.000034623903,0.00040482084,0.000005998382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015290615,0.000046684247,0.00008832157,0.00013330953,0.000025268722,3.1421413e-7,0.00017994242,0.0000011567479,0.00034785626,0.99313015,0.00007151262,0.0059739402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011040761,0.00004590786,0.000046622426,0.00075244706,0.000032251282,0.00002432679,0.0013780188,0.0000021557714,0.00085594284,0.049252715,0.947435,0.000064199674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078669016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071423464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9473635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018155963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042431126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7527099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176038780","doi":"","title":"Inadequate Reasons: The Need for Tribunal Participation in Judicial Review Litigation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Duty; Political science; Law; Tribunal; Officer; Statutory law; Administrative court; Obligation; High Court","score_opus":0.027729717854668923,"score_gpt":0.35588726995215386,"score_spread":0.32815755209748493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176038780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21129848,0.020735629,0.06635043,0.69158643,0.00040619692,0.0030462875,0.000025827378,0.00008446516,0.0064662592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680703,0.030017685,0.000025337631,0.00044424602,0.0004990562,0.00013789325,0.0000024740636,0.0000063404764,0.00079661014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820936,0.00021559787,0.00026486372,0.000102305574,0.00021215541,0.0009956975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936813,0.00021855906,0.00016214603,0.000089159876,0.00010827842,0.000053730102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046412735,0.000059307968,0.000100462225,0.000030587707,0.0005291318,0.00003915078,0.00020867107,0.000041948322,0.000029013656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081885385,0.000034330013,0.00007369763,0.00025169709,0.0000817019,0.00022088124,0.000010978839,0.00032013305,0.00001869067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151918175,0.00002233896,0.0003677766,0.000004601288,0.000009139777,6.9391184e-8,0.00031050414,0.0000011849803,0.000058994152,0.8958262,0.00038940914,0.102994554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006860045,0.00009306983,0.0021239729,0.00028651385,0.000044479504,0.0000045747483,0.0010655844,0.000026299298,0.00003733982,0.8131652,0.1823543,0.00011269308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000492926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013594974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75677186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007493296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017365192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75863147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176229594","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12648","title":"Citizenship Stripping, Fair Procedures, and the Separation of Powers: A Critical Comment on <i>Damache</i> v <i>Minister for Justice</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Casey House","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Political science; Separation of powers; Citizenship; Irish; Judgement; Constitution; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06491810052361464,"score_gpt":0.40136967097037346,"score_spread":0.33645157044675883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176229594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036532388,0.08465009,0.010793008,0.65711814,0.00016031649,0.003473539,0.00015205576,0.000061591774,0.24322595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942438,0.01629097,0.00060565106,0.087506,0.00015661752,0.00044750047,0.00002577304,0.0000130942235,0.00071063446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905044,0.00017138937,0.00024377032,0.00018071054,0.00020335859,0.00015036153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989962,0.00052102195,0.00007541159,0.00019058582,0.00015684935,0.000059957318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068440184,0.0000773043,0.0002190411,0.0000039033994,0.00039138153,0.00006590572,0.00012077882,0.000039302904,0.000023525143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052557373,0.00005466982,0.00008812686,0.000083297506,0.0003286513,0.000047507045,0.000029889094,0.000076315475,0.000003682183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013194146,0.00003938728,0.0000020574446,0.001466516,0.000010405742,3.1303364e-7,0.00056838716,8.8344376e-7,0.00002251893,0.9818714,0.014719218,0.0012857039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003999749,0.000027300088,0.0000030076876,0.0010128757,0.00021419895,0.0000017129474,0.00015993355,0.00016408513,0.000113169284,0.03568437,0.96213275,0.00008659202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037422276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015497829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94741356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002322086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001156393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30102298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177758299","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3689849","title":"Weaponizing Lex loci: The Banking and Finance Laws of Delaware and South Dakota","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Economics; Business; Financial system","score_opus":0.02128230016601909,"score_gpt":0.2666973031940293,"score_spread":0.2454150030280102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177758299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572965,0.00789128,0.0038763632,0.026200846,0.000027437492,0.00016321322,0.000004770232,0.000017644164,0.00452193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460936,0.0047263782,0.000073453186,0.00020808737,0.00019230798,0.000001846936,3.2984047e-7,0.000005551621,0.00018266834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898994,0.000059524915,0.00012804105,0.00010497362,0.00014718686,0.0005703597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997076,0.000046132976,0.000110257446,0.000056738936,0.00003846638,0.00004079845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007370008,0.00005509742,0.000085747466,0.000010460454,0.00072544964,0.00007001388,0.00017942717,0.0000325658,0.000010711869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058721864,0.000040448773,0.000029193792,0.00013886772,0.0001619072,0.000108471846,0.0000505015,0.00057198195,0.0000021916876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070783417,0.0000052870028,0.0020316879,0.0000034653503,0.000020601343,4.1335832e-7,0.010858003,0.000022486824,0.00013188852,0.97221667,0.000042122545,0.014660319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011806351,0.00032681157,0.0055394643,0.00007183459,0.00012911911,0.00008208082,0.119313054,0.0018150173,0.00022202922,0.5724832,0.29835188,0.0004849115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025714102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014668799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39973348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006590137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059245224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5579645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181813453","doi":"10.1515/ercl-2021-2013","title":"The Arguments in <i>Justice in Transactions</i>: A Reply to Commentators","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Contract Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive property; Law; Relation (database); Sociology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0219109574584339,"score_gpt":0.3389429854665116,"score_spread":0.31703202800807767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181813453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007801535,0.03592793,0.0004393909,0.110206045,0.0003356059,0.0015188433,0.000025571902,0.00003517674,0.8437099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91766393,0.045872193,0.00017977683,0.035387054,0.000055277633,0.000031449457,0.000002805715,0.000010637517,0.00079684873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850047,0.0006682674,0.0003748635,0.00012751058,0.00016916147,0.00015975682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993278,0.0002400717,0.00008146263,0.00022444985,0.000061860366,0.00006435822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017524628,0.00005464693,0.00014331144,0.0000118297285,0.00018805139,0.000038091293,0.00022587956,0.000008384077,0.00009431344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020151287,0.000043660842,0.00005538163,0.0003718516,0.000066963585,0.00008186895,0.000016431952,0.00011854109,0.000057113277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025252386,0.0006280962,0.00070673536,0.0010951195,0.00003615549,0.000101470825,0.0063484656,0.00002892339,0.00046128163,0.8569601,0.0069941576,0.12661423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001398042,0.0000060355314,0.0021708645,0.0009257269,0.000016563597,5.734883e-7,0.0003347106,0.0000013425637,0.0000620553,0.000057814505,0.99623436,0.00005016298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010195315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00444321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98924017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043217944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006785304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24794154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184000415","doi":"","title":"The Scope of Canadian Defamation Injunctions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Harm; Law; Scope (computer science); Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.024077274636678338,"score_gpt":0.2819323039551331,"score_spread":0.2578550293184547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184000415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037518393,0.0008150175,0.00011338266,0.021676997,0.00033411256,0.00020703902,0.000032845932,0.00003781778,0.9392644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887265,0.00052814203,0.00046043695,0.0005771199,0.00020075493,0.000031700485,0.000011203311,0.0000057593315,0.009458409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931335,0.00008350116,0.00013814274,0.00010384554,0.0001707426,0.00019040542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927115,0.00008209624,0.00004591367,0.0002273864,0.00018199816,0.00019147313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031352803,0.000041286658,0.00005656143,0.00003314732,0.0014329845,0.00012606847,0.00017643359,0.000047311372,0.0004157421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022272591,0.000034885958,0.00004344322,0.00064560137,0.00016144606,0.00013894438,0.000024121977,0.00010174819,0.00024189526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.949205e-7,0.000008679517,0.00031737814,0.0000016199799,0.0000058255955,4.9433993e-7,0.00027957585,0.000018236098,0.00019630433,0.99260795,0.0054209293,0.0011424201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004746551,0.0000034105617,0.0025599631,0.0000072724324,0.000006428166,3.5237395e-7,0.00096064986,0.00000544234,0.0007059286,0.0073134536,0.98834395,0.000045704408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57819295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9714248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98529446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009328079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008485098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184429340","doi":"","title":"Common-Sense Causation: How a Robust and Pragmatic Application of the 'But For' Test Can Solve the Circular Causation Problem in Cases of Multiple Contributing Tortfeasors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Tort; Test (biology); Liability; Plaintiff; Compensation (psychology); Computer science; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Political science; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.016640944452430546,"score_gpt":0.2708454016434107,"score_spread":0.25420445719098017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184429340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9684318,0.00036093168,0.018285371,0.011203448,0.000040308216,0.0014553748,0.000029476856,0.000010133494,0.00018318497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993796,0.00014017565,0.00017159825,0.000032157986,0.0001544736,0.00006337737,0.000004649554,0.0000071945933,0.00004680489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866396,0.00013349684,0.0002820329,0.000115862764,0.00022315321,0.00058152113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984777,0.0005763968,0.0004754882,0.00015871887,0.0002785071,0.000033178003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024879621,0.00007517601,0.00013522954,0.00003324109,0.00079115975,0.000046705907,0.00017711997,0.000055738037,0.0000011607341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072381186,0.000050719846,0.000052760573,0.00027529028,0.00029561052,0.00010249032,0.000031635456,0.00031124766,1.995408e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003998671,0.00020693867,0.26676553,0.00007019767,0.00010903894,4.6894053e-7,0.016164593,0.0006567913,0.00870085,0.6958139,0.00005280235,0.011418901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067265015,0.0012878226,0.19546483,0.00049151975,0.00061891106,0.0004812064,0.16848464,0.055176735,0.009066773,0.5461243,0.015020651,0.0010560977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006346495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14868866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15232006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003985263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096186646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9594044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184641484","doi":"10.4337/9781783479689.00021","title":"Good faith as a core principle","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Discretion; Law; Faith; Norm (philosophy); Paragraph; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050171248624711055,"score_gpt":0.31250178795765615,"score_spread":0.2623305393329451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184641484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018800686,0.00023638949,0.00006504191,0.0033915567,0.0008201459,0.0006099279,0.00010463574,0.00042288695,0.9941614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010506614,0.000059652928,0.0006797182,0.0011905812,0.0025633208,0.000069729416,0.00018107066,0.00011618695,0.98463315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966606,0.00007000746,0.00053746306,0.00082235254,0.001250058,0.0006595413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974726,0.00023495106,0.00044586297,0.00087668747,0.00048650266,0.00048343433],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011893172,0.00041116,0.00054223824,0.00015421648,0.0011060069,0.003319625,0.0012812039,0.00087629515,0.0018753244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006586321,0.0004318204,0.00037661416,0.00006885703,0.00035576304,0.00062098855,0.00057251455,0.0013831892,0.0005452132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035385883,0.000013626103,0.00001767393,0.00002346508,0.00007019219,0.000034044922,0.0022775074,7.981695e-7,0.000008993663,0.96677434,0.023076287,0.0076995236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000155721,0.000019886631,0.00002165938,0.00015583934,0.000056575078,0.0000061937203,0.0003563774,0.0000028600532,0.000016196575,0.0647903,0.93394685,0.00047153406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024161616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054639103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91087055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041789495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002171348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186640333","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3685","title":"Sanctity of Contracts in a Secular Age: Equity, Fairness and Enrichment by Stephen Waddams","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Law; Intergenerational equity; Business; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Sustainability","score_opus":0.02688828411787783,"score_gpt":0.33894541351035423,"score_spread":0.31205712939247643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186640333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24272761,0.0024999357,0.001363165,0.0053306897,0.00019389755,0.0002651996,0.000033285294,0.000020544878,0.7475657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986353,0.00042872576,0.00034091214,0.00018795459,0.00009285363,0.000005447813,0.0000037579337,0.000005538542,0.00029951058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988349,0.00016309024,0.00025183475,0.00014314205,0.0003596582,0.0002473661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994122,0.00006698691,0.00012815723,0.00011027204,0.00011295573,0.00016946586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077023316,0.00007273257,0.0001746738,0.000016843775,0.00037459418,0.00016928567,0.00017475187,0.00007205171,0.00013890251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006451828,0.00006908479,0.000050710434,0.0001416195,0.00015140456,0.00020611433,0.00013270181,0.0002434515,0.0000036226568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008226037,0.00023331614,0.0021831496,0.000013904289,0.000026490083,0.00008206932,0.0022079588,0.000019637922,0.005724483,0.9855275,0.00041802743,0.00355522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049375948,0.00016306936,0.032223064,0.00033050784,0.00014954073,0.0002055556,0.014222288,0.00014557887,0.010735386,0.550614,0.38538298,0.0008904214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030632604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26207352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7559077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096894095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014447213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9758225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3187821050","doi":"","title":"THE OPPRESSION REMEDY:: CLARIFYING PART II OF THE BCE TEST","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Plaintiff; Law; CLARITY; Corporation; Political science; Statutory law; Harm; Statute; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.057691719167339464,"score_gpt":0.3375791675816374,"score_spread":0.27988744841429797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3187821050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026597867,0.04914843,0.0000024789797,0.62608653,0.0004286622,0.0015151645,0.000034542434,0.000023071243,0.32010135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94298834,0.03532033,0.000022392618,0.009098149,0.00059764326,0.000061825725,0.0000014207172,0.000010983648,0.011898942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991248,0.00019733758,0.00016579764,0.000091403956,0.00019298994,0.00022762886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897724,0.00015964029,0.00010374108,0.00052905874,0.00009836081,0.00013193875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014810298,0.000053113607,0.00008849081,0.0000058110354,0.0042916946,0.00004263899,0.0008525593,0.0000383264,0.00023197115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007674144,0.000023205655,0.00006501468,0.00027779792,0.00057396176,0.000038148046,0.00007823221,0.00014919929,0.00008850933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.1800915e-7,0.000010460386,0.00076263066,0.000096253934,0.000012051905,2.7805103e-7,0.0025360398,3.1150435e-7,0.0000403174,0.6440283,0.2945995,0.057913233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013726785,0.000004685486,0.00091229565,0.00049651973,0.000019339035,3.9649046e-7,0.00009005272,0.0000027906829,0.000021416954,0.00096989045,0.9974323,0.000036594396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10562838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7651761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94032854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000914105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006589812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99700457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189544604","doi":"","title":"'State Succession to State Contracts: A New Framework of Analysis for an Unexplored Question'","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Ecological succession; State (computer science); Unification; Nexus (standard); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02361469976864647,"score_gpt":0.3702850698591559,"score_spread":0.3466703700905094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189544604","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38823867,0.00015991819,0.60648346,0.0043308176,0.00008072963,0.00026665613,0.00001087815,0.000027578872,0.00040129176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424,0.0005664328,0.0029089875,0.00015695134,0.00052440097,0.0000123467435,0.000004288641,0.000010986989,0.001575615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800026,0.00012080928,0.00030479205,0.00017719291,0.00027683287,0.0011201362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998959,0.00010387219,0.00023276826,0.0001637691,0.00026805306,0.00027252352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020656046,0.000086672975,0.00018898582,0.00015023767,0.00058770255,0.000106088846,0.00034968636,0.000057551766,0.000031268144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027782333,0.00007515793,0.00012586667,0.00085052184,0.00009101696,0.00031024247,0.000018742921,0.00041414157,0.000011696152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031749852,0.00017586294,0.0048991637,0.000002860712,0.0005755076,3.0104962e-7,0.016571796,0.0006605196,0.0011236459,0.8697182,0.00029207635,0.10566255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036711246,0.00065536215,0.0022920242,0.000026231539,0.0001814627,0.0000015041742,0.0037169943,0.00030677704,0.00041466442,0.9361181,0.055744424,0.00017529783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006413484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08620515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6060013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037579582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023679875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96953124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189853077","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-74878-4_7","title":"Epilogue: Law at the Limits of Imagination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Romance; Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Phenomenon; Law; Law and literature; State (computer science); Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05695844005575391,"score_gpt":0.32915381950067324,"score_spread":0.27219537944491934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189853077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016280846,0.00041870816,0.00004489103,0.012760616,0.00007567521,0.00016535017,0.00002657359,0.000020763884,0.9864711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028930672,0.00041921847,0.00007675719,0.00046834245,0.0001668167,0.00000784174,0.000037689904,0.000008769862,0.9698839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993733,0.000018241839,0.00013540225,0.00013602643,0.00025138078,0.00008560321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936455,0.00011153395,0.000106859756,0.00022400364,0.00016116397,0.000031894782],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002011047,0.000068680325,0.000101602964,0.000011280961,0.00034077777,0.000032128057,0.00019943091,0.000099138306,0.0034233644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018646266,0.00004861141,0.000085444924,0.00002585009,0.0003873802,0.00004389062,0.0000786998,0.00010344072,0.00019390162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.0234238e-7,0.0000042993533,0.0000018743484,0.0000031023155,0.000008511466,3.116839e-7,0.00029463935,5.037565e-7,0.000024365238,0.99269843,0.0051139425,0.0018496063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002267422,0.0000029485016,0.000011793255,0.000010495828,0.000015999383,2.1823125e-7,0.000087802946,0.000001462634,0.00012631693,0.057087168,0.9425748,0.000058316582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016867021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018583536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93746084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070086244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010108408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191900753","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3645236","title":"Bringing Rule of Law and Fairness to the Dysfunctional World of Sovereign Debt: A Role for Canada?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dysfunctional family; Sovereignty; Sovereign debt; Debt; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Medicine; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.0071896550465139685,"score_gpt":0.24588018840250628,"score_spread":0.2386905333559923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191900753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8901777,0.0009864123,0.0041307756,0.008544898,0.00017997528,0.0005979529,0.00003444388,0.0000078150215,0.09534002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971444,0.00003585202,0.00005503236,0.00015826452,0.0001192473,0.000006659523,6.8782776e-7,0.000004476615,0.0024753495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999084,0.00002259907,0.00012586423,0.000071312774,0.0001942791,0.0005019261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999635,0.00008728473,0.00008600387,0.000064653985,0.000082543054,0.00004452347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077539263,0.00004023882,0.00008094697,0.000022111522,0.00028213105,0.000019443269,0.00016097866,0.000014668643,0.000029354433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021772516,0.00003059836,0.000034813394,0.00011052055,0.000037194648,0.000060825503,0.000021922886,0.00019984817,0.0000010503302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000125843635,0.0000074519403,0.0012151137,0.0000030432368,0.000021166863,1.5555733e-8,0.00029493842,0.00013477386,0.00021650863,0.9966224,0.000058950947,0.0014130811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000590998,0.00011247165,0.0039264737,0.00003446534,0.000039072045,0.000011427892,0.014165051,0.00030242858,0.0007178301,0.7609753,0.21896182,0.00016263199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2843979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.920773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6363751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027346305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002503301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7203674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192239643","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3731215","title":"Benefit Corporations: A Persisting and Heightened Conflict for Directors","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology; Accounting; Political science","score_opus":0.023431165752189963,"score_gpt":0.29298704754559346,"score_spread":0.2695558817934035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192239643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85109365,0.0038422148,0.09049223,0.018706396,0.00029553723,0.0008854092,0.000014826558,0.00015145319,0.03451829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513924,0.0011359062,0.00048203426,0.000100707686,0.0004720776,0.00001969564,0.0000027808223,0.000008467333,0.0026390627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987661,0.00004220924,0.00013487348,0.000118831325,0.00012462554,0.0008133282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948734,0.00014456463,0.000111841946,0.000062405474,0.00010569985,0.00008816632],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016048447,0.00006203475,0.0000890714,0.00003473982,0.0013152928,0.00011754887,0.00012477521,0.000043256445,0.000009893257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019498522,0.0000560714,0.000054917073,0.00009670218,0.0000785812,0.00012915897,0.0000128098545,0.00028992005,0.0000037274574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004954852,0.000009967504,0.000888535,0.0000013488346,0.000018745768,2.571611e-8,0.0008714236,0.0000058552073,0.00009096778,0.9794473,0.000037149835,0.01862372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005233889,0.00014902228,0.00096599513,0.0000116278,0.000046301877,0.000016347258,0.006372883,0.00076984026,0.000035268273,0.5516166,0.4393122,0.00018052242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048216418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065836627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43927503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002306748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056764093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192479219","doi":"","title":"Le Manquement À La Norme De Diligence Et La Faute Dans Le Cadre Du Délit De Négligence (Common Law) Et De La Responsabilité Extracontractuelle Du Fait Personnel (Droit Civil) AU Canada: Une Étude Comparée (Breach of Standard of Care and Fault in the Common Law Tort of Negligence and Its Quebec Civil Law Equivalent, Fault of Extra Contractual Liability for Personal Acts: A Canadian Comparative Study)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Legal liability; Common law; Political science; Humanities; Due diligence; Diligence; Liability; Philosophy; Commercial law; Theology","score_opus":0.019070876654874634,"score_gpt":0.32669075708177214,"score_spread":0.30761988042689753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192479219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98379415,0.0022572826,0.0006504766,0.0032420247,0.000032254644,0.0011055783,0.00084734766,0.0000044542303,0.008066414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986911,0.0009591537,0.000061794985,0.00008428426,0.000048760758,0.00006079375,0.0000075934663,0.000018406554,0.000068133435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946356,0.0021225838,0.00082577683,0.00038965952,0.00059381675,0.0014325696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962555,0.0019432335,0.0007957155,0.00033152392,0.00036992173,0.00030407592],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008853189,0.0003046238,0.000779472,0.00004822648,0.0013361326,0.00012193155,0.0008948992,0.00019959982,0.0000055724254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021307138,0.0002907426,0.00015374795,0.00014925096,0.0023089717,0.000470531,0.0001051846,0.0012242905,4.513564e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003944926,0.00052343437,0.051712222,0.00014705406,0.00014991232,0.000010222348,0.16218945,0.0003903783,0.00061832665,0.7834575,0.0000058058936,0.0004011701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030093633,0.0016826175,0.32809147,0.0005143419,0.0003382308,0.00017670053,0.6281529,0.0020663312,0.00196516,0.026039697,0.007358868,0.000604331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99403334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75741786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028569207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0261236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192879709","doi":"","title":"THE CANADIAN DEFAMATION ACTION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Plaintiff; Damages; Tort; Liability; Law; Cause of action; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Business; History","score_opus":0.2110663506590466,"score_gpt":0.46872107221914083,"score_spread":0.2576547215600942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192879709","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01555234,0.0056724073,0.0000018119413,0.7386121,0.0003613915,0.0024006958,0.00002383142,0.00003090213,0.23734447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895141,0.0035549595,0.0000060562297,0.0040911343,0.00030339946,0.00010372857,0.0000037680736,0.0000071036416,0.0024157541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989059,0.00029569826,0.00013829661,0.00013207804,0.0002089081,0.00031911716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982927,0.000043664033,0.00008896964,0.0008445171,0.00010018582,0.00063000346],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018764484,0.00006715822,0.000095396295,0.00001774849,0.016961694,0.0007771187,0.0010310267,0.000041451174,0.00023799174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000353819,0.00004051439,0.000043182055,0.00010262548,0.00025296328,0.00018885439,0.000019715473,0.0001639873,0.0004100745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016820603,0.000041092804,0.027573716,0.00006169718,0.000055144756,0.000013119887,0.009943577,0.0000025294805,3.8972362e-7,0.5607389,0.12737449,0.27419364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024617968,0.000007473298,0.06472664,0.000031986237,0.000024694962,8.047637e-7,0.0005505265,0.0000065521144,8.030849e-8,0.00066827465,0.9338999,0.000058473168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9739618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006503102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028510126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193857824","doi":"","title":"Variations and Consideration in New Zealand and Canada: Gloria Jean’s Coffees International Pty Ltd v Daboko Ltd and Rosas v Toca","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; High Court; Legal certainty; Choice of law; Political science; Common law; Duty; Certainty; Business; Conflict of laws; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00870994786909918,"score_gpt":0.2614374681440859,"score_spread":0.25272752027498674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193857824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8448241,0.003481517,0.001629488,0.14532691,0.00040223394,0.00026429413,0.000027251364,0.000021402464,0.0040228367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777837,0.006083913,0.00016097343,0.00021068432,0.00029994381,0.0000034935297,0.000009629813,0.0000054668667,0.0054475474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988613,0.000087471104,0.00018384219,0.00016390781,0.0002037753,0.00049967435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995011,0.00014288582,0.00007899163,0.00005427622,0.0000966783,0.00012604667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061545405,0.00007397258,0.00010140049,0.000038921367,0.00044909018,0.0002481204,0.00007007496,0.00005094431,0.000039184928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025639363,0.00007414779,0.00001287412,0.00010040902,0.000058354475,0.00023041529,0.000039491857,0.00044921448,5.653738e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019959192,0.00002143605,0.033297166,0.0000016752172,0.000047100562,0.000005287941,0.0017969228,0.000013836442,0.00015927399,0.9565544,0.0012087552,0.0068741967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019868116,0.00014816245,0.108064264,0.00004370733,0.00006939325,0.00033942662,0.01151813,0.00073911756,0.00011047325,0.42223305,0.45431882,0.00042867172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.376752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9935446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61679256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005286511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00816317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99745965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194096526","doi":"","title":"Property in Tissue (Again) and Negligent Conception","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Property (philosophy); Estate; Law and economics; Property rights; Liver tissue; Order (exchange); Law; Personal property; Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Medicine; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.01693791516773191,"score_gpt":0.3165441350458687,"score_spread":0.2996062198781368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194096526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86760384,0.0015449469,0.0048555173,0.016936218,0.00021210287,0.0004817251,0.0000012847647,0.000048093523,0.108316265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99164575,0.001839955,0.0000542153,0.00010679559,0.0006712378,0.0000039611555,3.9955373e-7,0.0000044872763,0.0056732194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876046,0.00007351818,0.00011432337,0.000099822144,0.00013204242,0.00081986014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997714,0.0000116910915,0.000046808178,0.00005415627,0.000054175074,0.00006175801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010627506,0.00004588469,0.00005821363,0.000032210068,0.0004315955,0.00006115936,0.00011460497,0.00004165473,0.00006339756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038708495,0.000032514385,0.0000139237745,0.00013487223,0.0001712488,0.00015139482,0.000018190918,0.0004193315,0.000056742236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010516893,0.000034610184,0.002787685,9.929418e-7,0.000007631884,6.412199e-7,0.0042384085,0.000001097601,0.00087566354,0.8511544,0.00021144895,0.14067692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003492534,0.00021686003,0.002480919,0.000012794478,0.0000069376933,0.000021759712,0.008781997,0.000056524794,0.00018728495,0.2616628,0.72609156,0.00013130732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017519547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036434624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7258801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044979167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009878278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98114794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195145689","doi":"10.32920/24653421","title":"Contracting Out Liability for Negligent Pre-Contractual Misrepresentation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Plaintiff; Tort; Law; Liability; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.09143209179677932,"score_gpt":0.4412174807270089,"score_spread":0.3497853889302296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195145689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7622048,0.000015957234,0.022520607,0.026265044,0.0005970596,0.0025528716,0.000045656434,0.00076743984,0.18503053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98069125,0.000011467129,0.00051455374,0.0001565229,0.00034792686,0.00020261623,0.000018133627,0.0000054595607,0.018052079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992202,0.000042540458,0.00015929689,0.0001777399,0.0001636733,0.00023655801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989301,0.0007142968,0.00005347907,0.00012705495,0.00009465,0.00008040364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007259508,0.000046628567,0.00007020728,0.000019719115,0.00051637756,0.00009099843,0.00011888161,0.00004901812,0.00015190762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008200623,0.000043155476,0.00006185583,0.0001304163,0.000057413734,0.00016877394,0.000020617224,0.000049835457,0.00014104393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006522865,0.00022031191,0.013293939,0.00003264482,0.000048623,9.402976e-7,0.060618483,0.00053493615,0.0044524246,0.81443256,0.029007927,0.07729198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003801916,0.000020557614,0.033628818,0.0000038761664,0.000017528027,8.11477e-8,0.012706616,0.0040221834,0.0015996426,0.014936211,0.9325281,0.00015624371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027671016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003942197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9035201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004883554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008763295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41830486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196392441","doi":"10.1002/iir.1430","title":"Principles and rules on insolvency practitioners' remuneration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Remuneration; Creditor; Legislature; Commonwealth; Business; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Meaning (existential); Accounting; Restructuring; Law; Economics; Finance; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0710076039705598,"score_gpt":0.38368609644022966,"score_spread":0.31267849246966983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196392441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012297679,0.041102894,0.000569026,0.11170361,0.0008609724,0.00065083784,0.00007945893,0.00013718482,0.8325983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37775698,0.58282995,0.0049266987,0.011528024,0.0013000033,0.00031265887,0.00039374345,0.00003170435,0.020920204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987014,0.00013704004,0.00032954325,0.00027811795,0.0004134368,0.0001404876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999113,0.00012531172,0.00016303938,0.00019758721,0.00032206308,0.00007895224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048201118,0.000099433266,0.00014646542,0.000041295152,0.00035688787,0.0001308551,0.00020242175,0.000055868677,0.0006997068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086677977,0.000096441065,0.00007769091,0.00017496105,0.00008892486,0.0003708897,0.00006693493,0.0001545725,0.00022686258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021603978,0.00011651813,0.00029446086,0.00008091357,0.000020910154,0.000007023769,0.00032379752,0.0000029929756,0.00015832433,0.9823474,0.0024666977,0.014178764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008877008,0.000011952695,0.0015277276,0.000805526,0.000018240815,0.0000071833465,0.00010365738,0.000034098848,0.00009244177,0.0036871685,0.9935086,0.0001146357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016724417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003383371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107320644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002185795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76612985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196806002","doi":"","title":"R.V.P.C.: Accused Does Not Have Right to State-Funded Counsel for a First Appeal – Necessarily","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Balance (ability); Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013197572346375325,"score_gpt":0.29527868259889967,"score_spread":0.28208111025252436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196806002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42236662,0.000268195,0.41929734,0.13698006,0.00088756083,0.0023052671,0.00010928969,0.0002723522,0.017513322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853858,0.00035282335,0.00030789318,0.0007925123,0.000879808,0.00007067559,0.000004396371,0.000024463223,0.012181655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670684,0.000100588004,0.00030480738,0.00027375427,0.00042026583,0.0021937613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892724,0.00023392664,0.00017354102,0.0001985054,0.00020109524,0.0002657258],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028445048,0.00015265062,0.00020267471,0.00007780369,0.001797721,0.00031015053,0.0006111031,0.00008795094,0.000050313498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018755544,0.0001140346,0.00013943105,0.00018020497,0.000096601776,0.00024262039,0.00003378682,0.0006875926,0.00006496747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093454655,0.00008941413,0.00061968446,0.000007411806,0.0000761052,4.2430628e-7,0.0036653827,0.00011324175,0.0003609831,0.983977,0.0016264064,0.009370452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006567049,0.00014607211,0.00020698276,0.000009979775,0.0000247908,0.0000047197345,0.0018872737,0.00021629859,0.00034459008,0.35599577,0.64029944,0.00020741206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017406669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16849402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.638673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081156055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015785318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197231371","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3482","title":"Operative Subsidiarity and Municipal Authority: The Case of Toronto’s Ward Boundary Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Federalism; Federalist; Law; Constitution; Political science; Public administration; Judicial review; Legislation; Supreme court; Sociology; European union; Economics","score_opus":0.057990767656758875,"score_gpt":0.36781026215209295,"score_spread":0.3098194944953341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197231371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017009284,0.075557776,0.00020230435,0.11139429,0.00018496644,0.0006424064,0.000074713804,0.000037124646,0.79489714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97785735,0.019580198,0.00035649366,0.0018042042,0.00030870317,0.000007091218,0.0000011073487,0.0000056743097,0.000079188205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989007,0.00036155083,0.00025203094,0.00012216326,0.00018704857,0.0001764986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992741,0.000096513075,0.00013148884,0.00013078561,0.00012701587,0.00024014818],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010639199,0.000079127705,0.00018656913,0.0000025272623,0.001789203,0.00015640115,0.00026438513,0.00004806853,0.000362076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001466663,0.000053921984,0.00007808057,0.000068062596,0.00040728744,0.00030633577,0.000094673946,0.00032625755,0.0000058412957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057892435,0.000023810435,0.000052445248,0.000042522348,0.000024643361,0.00007196239,0.01203504,0.0000012031356,0.000029015,0.9819072,0.0011316596,0.0046747033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042504253,0.00013205828,0.00024592943,0.0002768083,0.0001869146,0.0006773688,0.015186828,0.0002684674,0.00007226222,0.023294883,0.95897853,0.00025490182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29856122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6767013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96084803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005693937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014575348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198167484","doi":"","title":"The Effect of Declarations of Unconstitutionality in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Constitution; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Legislation; Charter; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; History","score_opus":0.006912495185716458,"score_gpt":0.2748719481782007,"score_spread":0.26795945299248425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198167484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98398846,0.0019510739,0.00060375803,0.004565068,0.00008550514,0.00008504239,0.000007302473,0.0000014595211,0.008712335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987776,0.0009111219,0.000009160384,0.000009914322,0.000035560814,0.0000031457525,0.0000010080731,0.0000011095027,0.00025134417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896705,0.00019676196,0.00017284646,0.000044735883,0.0002045838,0.00041400024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945605,0.00026995305,0.00008986925,0.00007050511,0.000087767985,0.000025855576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015590668,0.000028209952,0.0000707873,0.0000098340015,0.0003289672,0.000010410968,0.00013512842,0.000015823538,0.00001270627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025783913,0.000020102123,0.000036215708,0.00022376995,0.0001062816,0.00004327154,0.000012274632,0.00033831873,4.6986804e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041678563,0.0000062904137,0.038818687,0.0000012898664,0.000017317621,4.0481802e-7,0.000069008056,0.00013794756,0.00010240096,0.9585741,0.000026940947,0.0022414413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018249976,0.00021336554,0.072133295,0.00007365167,0.00010615223,0.000086001004,0.034497827,0.00016166946,0.009424537,0.7099859,0.17116706,0.00032555222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78887236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24858822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010790526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036162812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9693012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198668915","doi":"10.1017/s1352325221000161","title":"FREEDOM FROM THINGS: A DEFENSE OF THE DISJUNCTIVE OBLIGATION IN CONTRACT LAW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Impossibility; Duty; Plaintiff; Damages; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Law; Business; Breach of contract; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012952929264848723,"score_gpt":0.2703564050383964,"score_spread":0.2574034757735477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198668915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48258236,0.0003599725,0.0007427602,0.0059223883,0.0003141307,0.00030486743,0.000063167055,0.000035040004,0.5096753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981027,0.000012010748,0.00015398851,0.000791365,0.00011055159,0.000014123471,0.000004731861,0.0000046004106,0.0008058919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990677,0.00035005785,0.00015448873,0.00013058192,0.00017931485,0.0001178089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919784,0.00042079797,0.00008429915,0.00019701208,0.000069788584,0.000030257117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005283388,0.000049650545,0.00009213479,0.0000096160375,0.00020264319,0.00004809423,0.00018746406,0.000057660258,0.00015078211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032550306,0.000037141235,0.00006920973,0.00023161371,0.0003022743,0.00024149436,0.00005559896,0.0001517145,0.000013078054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012022488,0.00004516277,0.0007144786,0.0000010967124,0.000008191879,0.0000014472768,0.008929887,0.000027915496,0.0011770037,0.98848933,0.000026674903,0.0005667596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038716744,0.00000721692,0.015833238,0.00006164038,0.000024220875,3.7936653e-7,0.009432376,0.00010427106,0.0033599972,0.866424,0.104247764,0.000117702424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020016411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018393546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51552033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051022722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015281193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199187393","doi":"10.1017/s0008197321000775","title":"MAKING SENSE OF MESNE PROFITS: REMEDIES","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Damages; Tort; Duty; Breach of contract; Law; Debt; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Liability; Finance","score_opus":0.07136537914229837,"score_gpt":0.3619567587059496,"score_spread":0.2905913795636512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199187393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2356676,0.0014400673,0.0005476192,0.053097196,0.0004981528,0.00017157967,0.000017781698,0.000037644153,0.7085224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959918,0.00025057397,0.00038091527,0.0005258496,0.0006342961,0.0000024870758,6.378049e-7,0.0000055636883,0.0022078224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990882,0.00017882255,0.00018833687,0.00006982029,0.00029499788,0.00017982005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933684,0.00009781465,0.00013481696,0.0001498747,0.00022500762,0.00005566989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086337555,0.000047726196,0.000097022414,0.0000102201575,0.0010711148,0.00008897115,0.00016726952,0.00002919075,0.00006247395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011073915,0.00003265393,0.000073488976,0.00017434533,0.00027583,0.00010174545,0.000060026796,0.00020472059,0.000015422884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049856976,0.000019077841,0.00010213035,0.000005015729,0.000022177339,0.000023777906,0.0024448629,0.000008034171,0.0021143907,0.9902815,0.0035720055,0.0014020213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018967352,0.000013546042,0.0014589942,0.00007347398,0.000042752417,0.00019455788,0.011229195,0.000023939561,0.006369412,0.0044720806,0.9758294,0.00010297693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040302982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014565743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98580945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039832958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001571202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8238257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199314467","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192896919.001.0001","title":"Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.31044610626318464,"score_gpt":0.4001816735191137,"score_spread":0.08973556725592907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199314467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000023762427,0.000071228285,0.00007412365,0.009970389,0.00006066126,0.00031091625,0.000019666251,0.000028242905,0.9894624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19886193,0.000032654323,0.00004743176,0.0028438158,0.00024101303,0.000028648466,0.000042668944,0.000008509904,0.79789335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896926,0.00014773509,0.00017642221,0.00019416877,0.00032096868,0.00019142884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916923,0.00046374305,0.00007216319,0.00022483619,0.000022600749,0.00004741489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045998977,0.000107952306,0.00016271778,0.000024106015,0.00067764893,0.00030561307,0.00039336568,0.000120649296,0.0007654449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005730013,0.0000798464,0.000077758494,0.0001861994,0.0005021434,0.00008741564,0.000052038155,0.0004028954,0.000043418026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.4034773e-7,0.000017449473,0.000004165991,0.000003982377,0.000006452258,0.000008353039,0.0033828756,4.8494127e-7,1.5950867e-7,0.9720116,0.024549976,0.000013755762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031879026,0.000004131839,0.000002709889,0.000029306253,0.000007355741,2.2457931e-7,0.006604405,8.8759515e-7,0.0000013509061,0.3041614,0.6890782,0.00007816072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006746204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80775714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80101097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004914109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005208351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200250482","doi":"","title":"Negligence, Discretion and the Liability of Municipalities for Building Regulation: The Case for Increased Deference","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Liability; Discretion; Private law; Law; Context (archaeology); Public law; Strict liability; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.024214513798194896,"score_gpt":0.33184865742070896,"score_spread":0.30763414362251407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200250482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82700855,0.0009774276,0.16228631,0.007632522,0.00007427447,0.0009856642,0.000015290587,0.000012351395,0.0010076185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839467,0.00034405026,0.000372477,0.000036717574,0.00035838856,0.00006583447,7.9638977e-7,0.0000038814565,0.0004231848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998964,0.00016841711,0.00018223663,0.0000889748,0.000101210695,0.00049514347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987988,0.0006742274,0.00014386607,0.00013229379,0.00022044097,0.000030408268],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046463627,0.000050145172,0.00008338819,0.0000149044445,0.0018759173,0.000070421986,0.00020357505,0.0000337077,0.000008957027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039910217,0.00002794302,0.00006850915,0.00011014448,0.00081134896,0.00011564019,0.000019322692,0.000188358,1.9048902e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072898714,0.000006742892,0.00008701644,0.0000031572956,0.000012727062,2.1437163e-8,0.0031769513,0.0000053989393,0.000030088528,0.99089617,0.000009354225,0.0056994692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044531559,0.000098861594,0.00016682448,0.000008920072,0.00004630767,0.000034332108,0.024065161,0.0022116618,0.00009940273,0.96357036,0.009202773,0.00005009582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004713266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028868686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17138612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001276965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006778404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201062983","doi":"","title":"The Overpaid Tax Litigation: Roadblocked","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Pleading; Mistake; Law; Supreme court; Reinterpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01010651694091457,"score_gpt":0.2858286206511119,"score_spread":0.27572210371019734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201062983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33196756,0.022015613,0.010532773,0.34913605,0.0013074286,0.0005094007,0.000011519675,0.0001811414,0.2843385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94682246,0.00810662,0.00004545777,0.00022099815,0.0009380583,0.000008105109,0.0000012981759,0.0000068091576,0.043850206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980766,0.00015873648,0.00015326774,0.000103716644,0.00030250827,0.0012051818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999425,0.000104069,0.0000840849,0.00013991633,0.00016403095,0.00008291808],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016993752,0.000054487944,0.000058699818,0.000011119269,0.0023830489,0.00025352268,0.0002665093,0.000043186472,0.000086993634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019692117,0.000040744995,0.00008415058,0.00024873862,0.0001148637,0.00013400192,0.000030060906,0.00081641274,0.00006813939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020170194,0.0000132482755,0.00022089707,2.6001365e-7,0.00002295325,0.0000010156858,0.0005303059,0.000004025943,0.00007937001,0.98452264,0.0006930896,0.01391018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009474181,0.000011136359,0.00023076976,0.0000025971367,0.000007236966,0.00002883176,0.007944264,0.000009022894,0.00008798217,0.38454866,0.60698515,0.00004960294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035021055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020101113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6148549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054899487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052335258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201852014","doi":"10.7202/1081837ar","title":"Vulnerability and Volition in the Testamentary Law of Undue Influence and Captation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Undue influence; Dignity; Harm; Law; Vulnerability (computing); Settlor; Sociology; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.019071114820054375,"score_gpt":0.2882880869896631,"score_spread":0.2692169721696087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201852014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872664,0.00008884485,0.000035997058,0.0029367642,0.000006355731,0.00011369032,0.000010856044,0.0000051209186,0.009535942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992919,0.00011175517,0.00023769702,0.00026319022,0.000027270833,0.000016506678,0.000006117866,0.0000015221682,0.000044061053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995705,0.00009686213,0.00009482868,0.00009481469,0.000063699554,0.00007928849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968576,0.00013493146,0.000030942363,0.00008777491,0.000035394627,0.000025212705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003805247,0.000021586891,0.000052182266,0.000008927156,0.00011856582,0.000028914166,0.00004890407,0.00002770129,0.0000075847925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088256355,0.0000255554,0.00001050139,0.00013029687,0.00015568061,0.000113814844,0.00001613125,0.00006263436,7.1964075e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019038506,0.000044635814,0.05360521,0.00004506942,0.0000020336472,0.0000030517278,0.011213222,0.000048215534,0.0016093047,0.93161815,0.000008669742,0.0018005067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017143495,0.000016366563,0.64900166,0.000046958896,0.0000132001005,0.000008971667,0.008459247,0.00024263626,0.00059507176,0.33803448,0.0033297194,0.000080255304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007706614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012398002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59539646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044599205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004176522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202507784","doi":"","title":"Defining Wrongful Dismissal: The Alberta Schism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Schism; Notice; Appeal; Law; Jurisprudence; Dismissal; Common law; Unfair dismissal; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.00669098513290078,"score_gpt":0.2724966439820912,"score_spread":0.26580565884919044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202507784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4948309,0.004105796,0.0015823316,0.057354376,0.00055607007,0.00045717243,0.0000019266768,0.00007305871,0.44103837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96771795,0.0011830978,0.000030868887,0.00027515285,0.0003009284,0.0000059804875,9.825834e-7,0.000012651827,0.030472377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787486,0.000107900196,0.00015140156,0.00012863733,0.0002821548,0.00145507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994437,0.0001577785,0.00010241822,0.00017582635,0.00004203819,0.00007821814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017181968,0.000076956305,0.00008471476,0.000024752348,0.0009899255,0.00014711088,0.0005171769,0.00005268697,0.00020555902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008791111,0.00005199984,0.00009205655,0.0001831762,0.00008909131,0.00018678511,0.000042979238,0.0012114397,0.000736799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031340444,0.000011633959,0.0022488083,4.535823e-7,0.000021393087,1.0459739e-7,0.0013213987,0.000012586237,0.000019405914,0.9894357,0.00017048037,0.006754914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022028602,0.000044424392,0.0010598341,0.000008138766,0.00001821742,0.000025899542,0.00983012,0.00006556967,0.000007343629,0.2983258,0.690269,0.00012538202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004813684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029063625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004042662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019461311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203219762","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab080","title":"Fiduciary accountability shattered","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Accountability; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Power (physics); Faith; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Duty; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04329446647327809,"score_gpt":0.36405394199132934,"score_spread":0.3207594755180513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203219762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6853038,0.0003208941,0.000077040044,0.011784243,0.00031701548,0.0002327056,0.000034254463,0.00019868108,0.30173135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895274,0.00007529291,0.0005434506,0.0008456234,0.00041888442,0.00003450826,0.000014956864,0.000010593216,0.008529291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987458,0.00013438785,0.00019343899,0.00031118118,0.0003008123,0.000314398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991747,0.00012704082,0.00005151657,0.00038753424,0.00013268006,0.00012652756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036927167,0.00009600446,0.00014356362,0.000022193162,0.00056411483,0.00015747518,0.00027635996,0.00009572787,0.0041545257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015440868,0.00009596373,0.000091736794,0.0002547994,0.00018083541,0.00025315204,0.00009128445,0.00013898897,0.00036342948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037856527,0.00089597143,0.09754238,0.000087816385,0.000108858854,0.00005216919,0.045573786,0.00004590368,0.0026504626,0.7140649,0.032914583,0.10602533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022981211,0.000007115087,0.07206612,0.000012486432,0.000022747152,0.0000025885897,0.0062635783,0.000023876737,0.0010754609,0.008878739,0.9111985,0.00021895823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018720787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005739623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8782839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010157354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033453797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99675584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203319755","doi":"10.82308/2850","title":"Loyalty in Quebec private law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.04288996502148651,"score_gpt":0.293184696783424,"score_spread":0.2502947317619375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203319755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5760159,0.000035320656,5.211806e-7,0.00053131965,0.00022945624,0.0003430099,0.000091142494,0.00017541819,0.4225779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892578,0.000025317702,0.00063446985,0.0008966522,0.00007347162,0.0000819734,0.0000134387665,0.000036201665,0.008980676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973562,0.00038037953,0.00043251933,0.00051208044,0.0006452909,0.0006735339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985053,0.0001312221,0.00014285781,0.00048768378,0.00017758425,0.00055533537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017523261,0.00021826831,0.00026285098,0.000096613745,0.0010905209,0.00014491034,0.00069397717,0.0002353262,0.00013825478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005354118,0.00022626804,0.000105965155,0.00070876884,0.00027453914,0.0010348576,0.00023678427,0.00055434037,0.000894395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013372225,0.000114199815,0.00031632712,0.0000061375767,0.000008442783,0.000013026136,0.00006113835,0.00003491113,0.0006879803,0.9850938,0.000013920633,0.013636756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005102993,0.000022909913,0.00082024693,0.000024272878,0.00000980663,0.0000012666166,0.00043080052,0.00001096624,0.0017769559,0.10571094,0.890376,0.00030554997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19591643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46213818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8903621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010544411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012004891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203869873","doi":"10.29173/mlj793","title":"Fraud and Knowledge of a Pre-Existing Security Interest under the Personal Property Security Act: Guidance from Other Jurisdictions for Manitoba Courts and Practitioners","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Business; Computer security; Security interest; Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08835478176432539,"score_gpt":0.3281525141459557,"score_spread":0.23979773238163032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203869873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513043,0.0004795982,0.0010335515,0.0021018148,0.00024674198,0.0005168561,0.00012751269,0.000031142696,0.044158462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841,0.00008336239,0.0005678849,0.0001720424,0.00064654474,0.00003648639,0.000002063708,0.000013350093,0.00006827339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990387,0.00015572409,0.0002592244,0.00018688367,0.00014641699,0.00021308016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991127,0.00017212985,0.00025618018,0.00011335094,0.00021839363,0.00012721292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073460327,0.00011248922,0.00013946707,0.000025393443,0.0018646494,0.00017721792,0.00018405769,0.000081516286,0.000080169055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006668299,0.000072845876,0.00006490939,0.000061683466,0.0005704972,0.00034309083,0.000079341575,0.0003192014,0.0000031094166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001989413,0.0007853379,0.009997406,0.000092641196,0.00030407426,0.0000037996617,0.24901155,0.0000017163512,0.00045147588,0.72767484,0.003993129,0.007485095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011812171,0.00018378782,0.04306321,0.0002702188,0.00024730456,0.00006908792,0.25521302,0.0008484889,0.00035632533,0.1959382,0.50217634,0.0004527883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06928207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45276645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5317366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008301992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011254445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204296663","doi":"","title":"‘Pipikos v Trayans’ - The High Court Revisits Part Performance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Test (biology); Political science; High Court; Legal history","score_opus":0.021510819791550184,"score_gpt":0.2678039574799942,"score_spread":0.24629313768844402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204296663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56640893,0.0029851226,0.0030305448,0.3903527,0.00033415263,0.00054916536,0.000007850888,0.00013300407,0.03619856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98383355,0.010894245,0.000021511085,0.0012960397,0.0017434517,0.000009055372,0.0000013017305,0.000009828675,0.0021909922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797577,0.00011045801,0.00018872847,0.00013261607,0.00034691268,0.0012455424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995324,0.000045265697,0.00010590041,0.00011211388,0.000068222966,0.000136094],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015172759,0.000082519655,0.000101128426,0.000011380877,0.001343636,0.0001223831,0.00052749267,0.00004642631,0.00015672807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006915486,0.000056234752,0.0000770285,0.0002593634,0.00010759244,0.00020327618,0.000027134969,0.0012423265,0.00017617323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013694378,0.000019954558,0.0008113946,0.0000033089757,0.000039656585,6.220617e-7,0.002760282,0.00005110606,0.000048729675,0.9674219,0.003399007,0.025430365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022310838,0.000102812766,0.00076672167,0.000009973545,0.000029732306,0.000015250653,0.003963604,0.00012439539,0.00003526898,0.02122921,0.9733763,0.00012366552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020144274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007872153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96997726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028796447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016165999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204540947","doi":"10.14217/9781848590151-en","title":"Bringing Justice Home","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Commonwealth Secretariat eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05270769029204942,"score_gpt":0.31654230388763094,"score_spread":0.2638346135955815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204540947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011551425,0.0010732132,0.0002946174,0.0009314982,0.00092917425,0.00084143534,0.000082427956,0.00041263324,0.9953195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009009966,0.00086124026,0.00050489727,0.0013472429,0.0029200497,0.00007302598,0.0001326527,0.00010034162,0.98505056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971382,0.00016445707,0.00058306946,0.00057454314,0.0007177426,0.0008219721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766517,0.00037831467,0.00046152683,0.00080532813,0.00016762654,0.0005220274],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006514742,0.0003878007,0.00058974535,0.00016279075,0.0025969362,0.00016056013,0.0010682862,0.0006139796,0.000206413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064408596,0.00043462828,0.0002587322,0.00007690462,0.00052683346,0.00008506574,0.0002819298,0.0011191552,0.00053158717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009165129,0.000017009625,0.000019708012,0.00017184744,0.000047302987,0.000027642554,0.0087325815,0.000004007675,0.0000020349987,0.8986831,0.085432366,0.0068532624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019234442,0.000020832305,0.00006765371,0.00013236246,0.00015295323,0.000005875839,0.00021289123,0.000042239684,0.0000012688635,0.019614967,0.9790833,0.0004733272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029471035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004232825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8936509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077635585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036323566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205252510","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0137","title":"Remedial consistency in private law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Consistency (knowledge bases); Duty; Wrongdoing; Compensation (psychology); Constructive trust; Law; Sequential consistency; Law and economics; Political science; Consistency model; Computer science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Data consistency","score_opus":0.01784485825747845,"score_gpt":0.2559892153328297,"score_spread":0.23814435707535125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205252510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05786771,0.00027803954,0.00012492518,0.0026457177,0.00014905757,0.000049118647,0.0000047530416,0.000009827291,0.93887085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964992,0.00044828738,0.0016621207,0.00009372951,0.00010139953,2.2982833e-8,0.0000010232433,0.0000017490344,0.0011924952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945295,0.00008948904,0.00008761928,0.00007291993,0.00017001205,0.00012700613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999611,0.000032387656,0.00006893929,0.00007811025,0.00011245691,0.00009705991],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023691167,0.000032577533,0.00008501783,0.000005329259,0.0006266655,0.000024533776,0.00017658128,0.000044155648,0.0012937069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021641941,0.000039032057,0.000058711707,0.00003551164,0.0002652248,0.00030856766,0.00004903196,0.000097507895,0.0000071130876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007460617,0.00004292535,0.0007464213,0.0000014041519,0.0000075391586,0.000046624365,0.004334647,0.000003471382,0.0002207423,0.9937554,0.0002299325,0.00060345256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039619755,0.0000114688855,0.0028157742,0.000019278159,0.000010964757,0.0000062564486,0.012876828,0.0000049847235,0.000083106825,0.004337075,0.97937596,0.00006213041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13839969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87834156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023481577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000166018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205549043","doi":"","title":"Judicially Licensed Unconstitutionality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Statute; Political science; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Legislation; State (computer science); Supreme court; Peacetime; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.018095047109342417,"score_gpt":0.31357814535862133,"score_spread":0.29548309824927893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205549043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23727745,0.0048773913,0.0354126,0.081654616,0.00084860483,0.00026710524,0.000014990321,0.00016336681,0.63948387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896134,0.0024575312,0.00015590471,0.000422853,0.0007775128,0.0000032156847,0.0000032780574,0.0000044614967,0.0065618283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813455,0.0001380863,0.00015755217,0.0001243256,0.00029726606,0.0011482281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945396,0.000050303097,0.00007073654,0.000101907324,0.00022076865,0.00010230221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015904129,0.00005566962,0.0000813322,0.000020677748,0.001095666,0.00009748546,0.00018226773,0.00005458638,0.00022950831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021450382,0.000055374036,0.00008671569,0.00026213424,0.00015511463,0.00014267293,0.00002526891,0.000794405,0.000100263445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027167355,0.000036679237,0.00067088404,4.281158e-7,0.000025793895,0.0000030593008,0.00026038426,0.000008806413,0.0001544555,0.9946069,0.00018696798,0.0040429267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017067803,0.000010681478,0.0007484456,0.0000042541524,0.000014328706,0.000056931105,0.0035163974,0.0000034492102,0.000050258008,0.5883759,0.40696824,0.00008040087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009375788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033816293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75233597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008121562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017052501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205641223","doi":"","title":"The Court of Appeal Recasts Fiduciary Accountability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Opportunism; Fiduciary; Accountability; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Business; Political science; Accounting; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.01166941544492292,"score_gpt":0.3018060198811697,"score_spread":0.2901366044362468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205641223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391724,0.001297475,0.00043714384,0.010967598,0.00032119325,0.00030561376,0.000003943481,0.00002086817,0.047473803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932957,0.0033666142,0.000019407395,0.00004224765,0.0002649174,0.0000036112226,5.5552636e-7,0.000005558188,0.0030013612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982013,0.00012734688,0.00020222367,0.000103359074,0.0003221457,0.0010435889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993468,0.00014647441,0.00015183863,0.00018783222,0.000116816314,0.000050241528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041222186,0.000055929715,0.00008993084,0.000016358137,0.00066952995,0.000056527417,0.000434926,0.000049093567,0.00006378325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073195886,0.000038487593,0.00008519579,0.00015575967,0.00014499718,0.0001433755,0.00003426101,0.0007954198,0.00006886473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017413868,0.000034273176,0.0076667126,0.000001749399,0.000027928098,6.070576e-8,0.0008114085,0.000006807544,0.00014466922,0.9777368,0.00020152084,0.013350684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030680647,0.00010769231,0.0074708853,0.000011431687,0.000018627668,0.000013431801,0.019934123,0.00003919565,0.000053278414,0.57259744,0.39931098,0.0001361442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011575582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010652918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40513936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004930899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002680557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59445786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205734119","doi":"10.7202/1082058ar","title":"Contract Variation and Changed Expectations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Notice; Estoppel; Variation (astronomy); Law and economics; Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Equity (law); Law; Business; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.03381956063807098,"score_gpt":0.31442457339696034,"score_spread":0.2806050127588894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205734119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040863317,0.0005964056,0.001684974,0.038887244,0.0005011237,0.00019358165,0.00005648499,0.00007138675,0.9171455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982125,0.00013210614,0.0008687389,0.0002417902,0.00028029742,0.0000055140704,0.000002046233,0.0000034533502,0.00025354416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994926,0.00008166024,0.000099992074,0.0000718937,0.00013827169,0.000115623516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959695,0.00006223958,0.000056318557,0.000048397193,0.00013447161,0.0001016157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020789709,0.000032662305,0.000052565607,0.000012574718,0.0039007005,0.00012285546,0.000047187306,0.000031943742,0.00027390246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008002351,0.000031558106,0.000026264328,0.000096001815,0.000046427605,0.00019368481,0.000013195817,0.00010400783,0.000017647479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010700784,0.0000246466,0.000057031,6.880665e-7,0.000008716754,0.000006578131,0.0028223952,0.000002135501,0.00036793167,0.9942677,0.000051289608,0.0023897858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023326612,0.000007927282,0.0060341605,0.000006927581,0.000016185995,0.00003499576,0.003086921,0.000048837177,0.00028880328,0.006956666,0.98321337,0.00007191602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012872813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021747949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98731107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041284486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019103358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206152380","doi":"","title":"Understanding Administrative Law -- Chapter 1 (A Values-Based Approach)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Judicial review; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Comparative law; Common law; Public law; Legitimacy; Realisation; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1488256602449083,"score_gpt":0.3490439989028122,"score_spread":0.2002183386579039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206152380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004850685,0.000776961,0.28001326,0.012513414,0.00014453655,0.00024014388,0.0000066532843,0.00007053287,0.7013838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562603,0.0003665886,0.0004291964,0.00033443095,0.0002968458,0.0000075574435,0.0000041875137,0.000010854413,0.0029243035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998099,0.000119512435,0.0001532612,0.000169863,0.00030165983,0.0011566565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954295,0.000057364254,0.00008798119,0.00011275521,0.00008201831,0.00011690036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001154466,0.00008470218,0.00010138668,0.000025646541,0.001248289,0.00016688599,0.00018974795,0.00006166829,0.00013398073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036361915,0.00008004606,0.0001066175,0.00017020314,0.00018825894,0.00016009549,0.000017773948,0.00083321973,0.000021706113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056815743,0.00004599785,0.000045543195,0.0000010809512,0.00003078961,0.0000025819616,0.0007207331,0.000039711173,0.0000626472,0.99871963,0.000021647324,0.00030397647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003455882,0.000065176486,0.000016685437,0.000008945001,0.00002832901,0.000040991355,0.033572443,0.00015888728,0.00019918129,0.9016043,0.063796125,0.00016336498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019978589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061348863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99077535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011785091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034632778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96009564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206404968","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2021.1978696","title":"Private law, public right, and the law of unjust enrichment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Private law; Law; Tort; Normative; Liability; Law and economics; Political science; Property (philosophy); Public law; Sociology; Restitution; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0209397891074636,"score_gpt":0.3081491127528706,"score_spread":0.287209323645407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206404968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15680486,0.0014566418,0.0007040995,0.07619366,0.00018482243,0.00046179278,0.000016617743,0.000064494656,0.764113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969362,0.00032451004,0.00035888076,0.00083533785,0.00008180597,0.000025383612,0.0000011643642,0.0000030815913,0.001433624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917686,0.00011379386,0.00014142046,0.00014989784,0.00025958414,0.0001584168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993671,0.0001689434,0.000069163936,0.0002327162,0.000094163835,0.00006788915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048149025,0.00004998088,0.00009736833,0.0000075135786,0.0005162372,0.000113509814,0.00024848882,0.000036277426,0.00012109158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006236896,0.000034035795,0.00003721464,0.00022275372,0.00089000363,0.0001881413,0.00012902575,0.000081608574,0.000017903016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019048406,0.000027173823,0.00019950837,0.0000051263382,0.0000062537206,0.000001303356,0.0015318884,5.852665e-7,0.00020786207,0.9976007,0.00017358566,0.00024414924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024145396,0.0000054654774,0.0010356553,0.000009852627,0.000012323046,0.0000011110419,0.00059874565,0.000015223242,0.0016773087,0.05399328,0.94234407,0.000065515305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019595765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004023692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022810778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009326524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39705315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206563963","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v3n2p156","title":"Just Laws versus Unjust Laws: Asserting the Morality of Civil Disobedience","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Obligation; Civil disobedience; Unjust enrichment; Morality; Moral obligation; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Sociology; Public law; Restitution; Politics","score_opus":0.05195223054659951,"score_gpt":0.3656830429348158,"score_spread":0.31373081238821626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206563963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.882466,0.00005506959,0.000029754681,0.008860753,0.00039396057,0.00005203065,0.000012010858,0.0000040864547,0.10812631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895203,0.000044939276,0.00017471235,0.00018420325,0.00045590845,6.496826e-7,1.9286664e-7,0.0000029511364,0.00018442157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992735,0.000041735453,0.0002429441,0.000051746745,0.00022555514,0.0001645657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991571,0.00021233047,0.00024154155,0.000103336955,0.00016813604,0.000117592375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076938706,0.00004469605,0.00010173396,0.000011837276,0.00043572558,0.000069726244,0.00022676279,0.00004237255,0.00004079374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019201198,0.000029054503,0.000056004854,0.00007618061,0.00052009564,0.00013559894,0.000039103586,0.00023908414,0.0000011075202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034919003,0.000026774524,0.0008658692,0.000005072805,0.000006408047,5.953609e-7,0.0016515779,0.0000019728288,0.000451786,0.9967064,0.00013756558,0.00014248215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069523056,0.00013199411,0.017229741,0.000044677938,0.00011269667,0.000008377037,0.013706899,0.00011688129,0.00093049294,0.04351028,0.9233446,0.00016812696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036820038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013898523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014618325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098735305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77557015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206674422","doi":"","title":"Restitution & A Restorative Justice: A Call for the Expansion and Increased Use of Criminal Restitution Orders at Sentencing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Damages; Compensation (psychology); Criminology; Criminal justice; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06930908809955975,"score_gpt":0.36058799488163246,"score_spread":0.2912789067820727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206674422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669688,0.00048018343,0.026322965,0.0053107203,0.00013599823,0.00044806724,0.000008192709,0.000012980141,0.00031210197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685407,0.0021384726,0.00030455337,0.00004407748,0.00022852769,0.000017509314,0.0000019329896,0.0000050418757,0.00040582364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987648,0.00009837266,0.00017337377,0.00013050548,0.0002273729,0.0006055359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989815,0.0002297059,0.00031211606,0.0001885084,0.00022070095,0.000067504116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001715827,0.00007191546,0.000092483024,0.000033097876,0.004866774,0.00015752934,0.0002164751,0.000058015183,0.0000017838641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014352967,0.000052057785,0.000051101797,0.00005151653,0.0005007261,0.000454009,0.000052517385,0.00038595288,0.0000010536447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025305978,0.000031976862,0.0012754786,0.000014477428,0.00004079079,9.732001e-7,0.0030829683,0.000098659395,0.0038575134,0.9856086,0.00017545868,0.0055600633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0091982605,0.0022871953,0.13847065,0.0008576635,0.0041987537,0.0005018818,0.17826113,0.016607463,0.0027427217,0.31703466,0.32816607,0.0016735453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02078893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07771466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6685739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068832625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020123597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208053832","doi":"","title":"La consécration par la Cour suprême du Canada d'un principe directeur imposant l'exécution du contrat de bonne foi","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011771579213172421,"score_gpt":0.22393120779851894,"score_spread":0.2121596285853465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208053832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62232596,0.0041857017,0.025282463,0.14264686,0.0007303933,0.0009424822,0.0002708177,0.00029792066,0.20331737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98098576,0.0018684604,0.0042164647,0.00035905303,0.00018379664,0.0001049105,0.00018662984,0.00004610321,0.012048801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861283,0.011039723,0.00068337016,0.0006493446,0.00077211,0.000727195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264276,0.0028105006,0.00053138,0.0009679328,0.0022970955,0.0007503541],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011194408,0.0003591352,0.0003879198,0.00007541362,0.0012315882,0.0005794144,0.00095003843,0.0003664682,0.00020896674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033146923,0.0003979269,0.0001570972,0.000772173,0.0009547658,0.00048348858,0.0003090395,0.0005382074,0.00007308946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002374008,0.00075772544,0.013372697,0.000045898683,0.00008067609,0.000035246332,0.025056053,0.00007939129,0.0012549334,0.923658,0.011993479,0.023642166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011509054,0.0000017453093,0.011254879,0.0003032361,0.00010715315,0.00007995348,0.0018516325,0.011200081,0.009260276,0.004085405,0.9601699,0.00053483696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54674566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74588954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94817644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009529034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042677145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211048706","doi":"","title":"Transparency in the service of ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue Internationale De Psychosociologie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Remuneration; Obligation; Accounting; Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Corporate governance; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.27198793452982234,"score_gpt":0.42670053735161484,"score_spread":0.1547126028217925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211048706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82669145,0.00021844533,0.00074961997,0.09961484,0.000106474996,0.00016631755,0.000018378705,0.000021581844,0.07241288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613804,0.0017524377,0.0004672358,0.0010407915,0.00014260078,0.000044459728,0.0000055928285,0.0000027677277,0.00040606593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992599,0.00018437128,0.00017202999,0.000099421806,0.00016663145,0.00011765601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890286,0.0007811744,0.000068668145,0.00012232688,0.00010618772,0.000018803328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000829853,0.000039685456,0.00006681658,0.000028062828,0.00015394684,0.0000063488774,0.000549156,0.00010483593,0.000057644484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034303538,0.00003266496,0.00004631382,0.00018921397,0.00016468384,0.000050950464,0.000009547642,0.000271547,0.00002225611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009188306,0.00021265598,0.12730542,0.000028583436,0.000016364454,0.000008130483,0.19994457,0.00022156337,0.00028478287,0.66968346,0.0011506346,0.0011346252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041864032,0.00003448075,0.5250964,0.000094614545,0.000009537574,0.000018212215,0.012274276,0.00020788486,0.00007549722,0.089597136,0.3719823,0.0001909831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023752437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027892743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58008635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061423336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015871378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35906738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211235346","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3331612","title":"The Interface Between Sales Law and Secured Transactions Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Interface (matter); Business; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.01403247581716833,"score_gpt":0.3193433124179118,"score_spread":0.3053108366007435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211235346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34325603,0.010239284,0.14795434,0.14376585,0.00085551286,0.0009712193,0.000039436243,0.0002903944,0.35262796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955502,0.001655943,0.000036671237,0.00012565922,0.0006260532,0.0000041767876,3.996322e-7,0.000007079437,0.0019938145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986319,0.00009275361,0.00012747703,0.00009515167,0.00015227938,0.0009004239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960786,0.000099436984,0.000057004094,0.00008786388,0.000065760745,0.00008209618],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011654468,0.000059679536,0.00006501764,0.000010781078,0.0033588305,0.00019850003,0.00023930115,0.000047213467,0.000018905908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010984131,0.00004240366,0.00004240907,0.0000991288,0.0007052307,0.00016537926,0.000010826026,0.00067819504,0.00003505965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037737427,0.000006107586,0.000031448853,3.0439554e-7,0.000032624794,4.307667e-8,0.0015638367,4.8939444e-7,0.00004401987,0.99314284,0.000032688247,0.005141807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011860189,0.00007021687,0.00007715387,0.0000039867064,0.00002347836,0.000010072619,0.005966646,0.000006928024,0.000118315904,0.3377759,0.6557625,0.00006624678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021845882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18637052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6557298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021428557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000488164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99793863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211457273","doi":"","title":"Civil Appeals in Ontario: How the Interlocutory/Final Distinction Became So Complicated and the Case for a Simple Solution?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Appeal; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; CLARITY; Jurisdiction; Law of the case; High Court; Sociology; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.040599806276706084,"score_gpt":0.28985183932433667,"score_spread":0.24925203304763058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211457273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60422486,0.0012405943,0.05537562,0.33608016,0.0000920393,0.0014303953,0.000015893716,0.00005113778,0.0014892817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848884,0.0002052743,0.000016824983,0.00049232517,0.00023634305,0.000054773704,0.0000036618035,0.000007143599,0.0004948076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856484,0.00017792138,0.0001748305,0.00015041855,0.0001276944,0.0008042825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945706,0.00018466882,0.00013309109,0.00008722675,0.00006208936,0.00007584955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016877152,0.000082998,0.00012160495,0.000018013632,0.0016935808,0.0002616327,0.00024543641,0.000042224827,0.000018938113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013056489,0.000050724335,0.00007716077,0.00016143794,0.00034303195,0.00012646598,0.00004724974,0.000986869,0.00000302601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016759663,0.00003783567,0.001667047,0.0000036916995,0.00005387166,0.0000042082474,0.0126958545,0.000019309886,0.000047988808,0.97644144,0.0010592716,0.007801894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034452325,0.00027462363,0.0033923045,0.000013800617,0.00011030871,0.00068445277,0.042098023,0.0049609505,0.0000058071646,0.41804513,0.52669823,0.00027111158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0903589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94048584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8501269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055967673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001451005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212206078","doi":"","title":"Prospective Overruling Unravelled","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Law; Dignity; Injustice; Political science; Substantive law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011948360914780728,"score_gpt":0.2985914174258738,"score_spread":0.28664305651109306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212206078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37817076,0.007188453,0.039734118,0.030096674,0.00068325654,0.00049177225,0.0000059338563,0.00018468626,0.54344434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97883314,0.0031508806,0.00013593605,0.00011570816,0.0006105508,0.0000051318743,0.0000010056074,0.000007832082,0.017139796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981889,0.00008344608,0.00012799753,0.00013403804,0.00024237984,0.0012232086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956393,0.000037870424,0.00006678646,0.00008974275,0.00016023286,0.000081431535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010209259,0.000058155612,0.00008206369,0.000022290427,0.0008950642,0.00011190589,0.00016063564,0.00004776109,0.00015312486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014089474,0.000055536497,0.0000800692,0.00026475606,0.00005558638,0.00013201794,0.000028184524,0.00090461015,0.00006828774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035922071,0.00003045391,0.0014151776,4.7625537e-7,0.000032073804,0.0000025990657,0.001307886,0.000009243766,0.00021757363,0.99263686,0.000047224516,0.004296869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003847356,0.000031676944,0.0013143909,0.000008082745,0.000020856414,0.00006649611,0.021623753,0.000031639618,0.00028003546,0.8294222,0.14667661,0.00013952976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032743893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008353344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6006624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009258711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056513334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W321300874","doi":"","title":"Book Review – Liability of the Crown, 3rd ed., by Peter Hogg & Patrick Monahan","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Statutory law; Liability; Law; Perspective (graphical); State (computer science); Common law; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.006535668266675321,"score_gpt":0.2721116614992769,"score_spread":0.26557599323260156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W321300874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017989023,0.90913063,0.00081746373,0.022241026,0.0002397302,0.0009134501,0.000015014237,0.000033908538,0.048619762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5610639,0.41771287,0.000025494559,0.0035627156,0.00017202784,0.000019657527,9.575498e-7,0.000013610884,0.01742881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978457,0.00036538072,0.00029254268,0.00014023647,0.00035923568,0.0009969064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992788,0.00005933667,0.00021889471,0.00024515454,0.00011682953,0.00008101087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026515026,0.00008702373,0.00015169894,0.000013058713,0.000547771,0.00003284022,0.00044227616,0.00005113532,0.00043586496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026910275,0.00005835415,0.00019312027,0.00026239906,0.00016003672,0.00014528415,0.000027102691,0.00084155786,0.000024185229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009633006,0.00027367694,0.004235373,0.00007775428,0.00009087579,3.3145943e-7,0.0006195114,0.000004856105,0.0002814885,0.57524765,0.40848827,0.010670568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009390103,0.000029156423,0.00021513451,0.000039607712,0.000027921493,0.000008204374,0.00020342643,5.982955e-7,0.00009212843,0.019995779,0.97921824,0.00007587439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026814707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004661617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57073003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044870505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020886562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47724158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214965417","doi":"","title":"Prospective Overruling Offends the Rule of Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Adjudication; Political science; Rule of law; Legal doctrine; Politics","score_opus":0.015374354426145027,"score_gpt":0.3023996785738874,"score_spread":0.28702532414774234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214965417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36032274,0.0063524046,0.00353282,0.05049219,0.00039517612,0.00032484627,0.000009443477,0.000053951862,0.5785164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99454814,0.0010784639,0.000057991943,0.00013395285,0.00034384232,0.000004193929,5.462994e-7,0.000005265825,0.0038275945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872285,0.00008494477,0.0001333642,0.000086342116,0.00024114706,0.0007313444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995577,0.00005758458,0.00009408092,0.000106201616,0.00014774164,0.000036741727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001155293,0.000045127435,0.000075626864,0.000010435872,0.000759495,0.000055141674,0.000211515,0.000032630447,0.000063619394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065404645,0.00003257583,0.00008182914,0.00018567566,0.00014340805,0.00010536476,0.000031831318,0.00069235294,0.000010360047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002772384,0.000026576674,0.0003741068,6.718539e-7,0.000031720094,4.768223e-7,0.0022878086,0.000011045636,0.00036977764,0.9951491,0.000015090812,0.0017308851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021274631,0.000031498446,0.0011561636,0.00000851328,0.000024778208,0.000032639,0.013797459,0.000013690565,0.0012210706,0.80309546,0.18033026,0.00007571691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013413907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0106925825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6342254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037779403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023819713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5966712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215074703","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Common-Law Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.01472438140394272,"score_gpt":0.2733152877712637,"score_spread":0.25859090636732096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215074703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35251126,0.000058416044,0.000027132404,0.007825586,0.00023143431,0.0002134132,0.00001537312,0.00005816882,0.6390592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993654,0.000007754767,0.00013844352,0.0033077805,0.00027810468,0.00003055678,0.000005751446,0.000008490977,0.0025691101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890983,0.00012228229,0.00018187996,0.00018412207,0.00028034675,0.0003215656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993237,0.000112593305,0.000046214587,0.0002586752,0.000032131433,0.00022664269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041136384,0.00007888978,0.00013516017,0.000012557798,0.00047919728,0.000089442314,0.00034813586,0.00006394331,0.00031605866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047389847,0.00008001827,0.000029414743,0.00019107743,0.0001458257,0.00014774772,0.00004996875,0.00019622632,0.00014321935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015300911,0.000018128301,0.0040880255,0.0000026308721,0.0000019984145,0.0000016445972,0.00019658028,0.000025878086,0.000019785573,0.9912774,0.0038043265,0.0005620956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016795332,0.0000060160432,0.005131961,0.000009044034,0.0000026281248,2.436127e-7,0.00024227855,0.000052345964,0.000073081785,0.016258428,0.9779383,0.000117706644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98372495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99902385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022410852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031657045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36856464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215460403","doi":"10.29173/mlj730","title":"Sharing a Life: Manitoba Legislation Respecting Rights and Obligations of Common-Law Partners","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Common law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.05481725230381535,"score_gpt":0.3430010980170419,"score_spread":0.2881838457132266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215460403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8513485,0.00013899476,0.00025320298,0.0033239275,0.00012389416,0.00017450347,0.0000049385662,0.000046211626,0.14458579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973205,0.000027471115,0.0011933972,0.00020804019,0.0011619006,0.000006727064,0.0000021141745,0.000008780812,0.00007106927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988215,0.0000834069,0.00037128883,0.00015151818,0.00032578895,0.00024648773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991798,0.00010279533,0.00024792334,0.00014173942,0.00012453014,0.00020322127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007151937,0.000090098554,0.00013969425,0.00005409137,0.0026497948,0.00034658873,0.00023738127,0.00006873491,0.000048351452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030606414,0.00008583294,0.000058369325,0.00015958406,0.00028044207,0.0006266616,0.00006664848,0.00025132208,0.000014723107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004744642,0.00004892415,0.0028472622,0.0000033242393,0.000019412908,0.0000020027398,0.0023317628,0.00014127554,0.00012131826,0.99176955,0.00027077616,0.0024396388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008683014,0.000060138973,0.0071190796,0.0001257816,0.000093581024,0.000055851935,0.03292305,0.0012970895,0.00093957555,0.26066253,0.6954538,0.00040119435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06851547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7873987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73110706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013740633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216180690","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-88704-9_2","title":"Property and Privacy in Context","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Future of business and finance","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Intersection (aeronautics); Information privacy; Computer security; Tangible property; Intellectual property; Personal property; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Intangible property; Epistemology; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021128607349247916,"score_gpt":0.2460499811286129,"score_spread":0.224921373779365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216180690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010253618,0.04601875,0.00006330048,0.021089837,0.0004294459,0.0007020791,0.00008325063,0.000021300242,0.92133844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32376,0.07312858,0.00041222564,0.00023039858,0.0009428344,0.000023207276,0.000019594503,0.000023171882,0.60146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999467,0.0000061339497,0.00014202874,0.00019791276,0.000095868454,0.00009102488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961215,0.000014633206,0.0001031491,0.00012219245,0.00012970302,0.000018198514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007971586,0.000095299714,0.00022606851,0.000025333175,0.00010559556,0.00002874207,0.00008748251,0.00016603725,0.000036852656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014761385,0.000070269365,0.000019666899,0.00006105883,0.00020193016,0.00006907338,0.0000678508,0.00012299305,0.0000014057277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042955267,0.000009531662,0.000117095304,0.000059776754,0.0000028653767,0.0000045858924,0.0011190076,3.8166928e-7,0.00000384799,0.8897146,0.00042595144,0.10853809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107823886,0.0000040510295,0.0069622183,0.00021674641,0.000005524172,9.364689e-7,0.00013876245,0.0000021944516,0.0000014594281,0.004273417,0.9881825,0.00010437758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008057173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027872114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98775655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012698094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013987586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28655016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W330202545","doi":"","title":"Modernising charity law : recent developments and future directions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Political science; Law reform; Public law; Government (linguistics); Law; Common law; Comparative law; Public administration","score_opus":0.014409961622668686,"score_gpt":0.24195138079830564,"score_spread":0.22754141917563694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W330202545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009486868,0.0002543133,0.00012100872,0.011764294,0.00022854182,0.00039433173,0.00007695851,0.0002741543,0.9773995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047064673,0.04595112,0.019482521,0.00018003261,0.00065076904,0.000004754865,0.00011272557,0.000064634536,0.8864888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990664,0.000022155917,0.00013035312,0.0003708962,0.00018707462,0.0002231194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991936,0.000023005512,0.00018950467,0.00031604816,0.00018192749,0.00009591005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018280107,0.00015315604,0.00026109832,0.00019711732,0.0010792493,0.000021500138,0.0004513073,0.0009486229,0.00024291968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018083754,0.00018095748,0.00005695126,0.00016630992,0.0009776141,0.0000902373,0.00032055593,0.000769968,0.000036912526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010994042,0.00006239276,0.0009792428,0.000028979537,0.00008456617,0.000009672181,0.0020259966,1.4698874e-7,0.0000439235,0.8790478,0.0021028274,0.11560347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015295147,0.000006721476,0.0014306244,0.000035329478,0.000041298084,0.000001739489,0.0006196767,0.0000014968249,0.00002580229,0.025722189,0.9717831,0.00017907756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018851965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015309821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96968025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018342068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004363121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.854324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W331334795","doi":"","title":"What Were the Principles of Nineteenth-Century Contract Law?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Predictability; Law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017128365771114026,"score_gpt":0.3031149079274654,"score_spread":0.2859865421563514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W331334795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73181105,0.033689626,0.004116993,0.034796663,0.0013716096,0.0008922731,0.000007229021,0.00009273217,0.19322182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754011,0.022010814,0.000028356035,0.0002094092,0.000555137,0.000002674758,0.0000010553783,0.000008688596,0.0017827343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976893,0.00009032649,0.0003054878,0.00010889379,0.0003877702,0.0014182108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992084,0.00018849166,0.00023853534,0.00016141562,0.00011094483,0.00009224152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045138025,0.00008302386,0.00011699217,0.000029507713,0.0007985391,0.00014149537,0.00048266666,0.00006770296,0.00006816916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006303662,0.000056114604,0.00011947695,0.00016195468,0.00026866165,0.00038334302,0.000034722965,0.00097253115,0.000017252754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013679356,0.00004313076,0.00047237147,0.0000010311012,0.0000373212,6.046096e-7,0.0014568437,0.000008807959,0.0001463564,0.98649454,0.000021310694,0.011304024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003482979,0.00007696515,0.0022156453,0.000025248284,0.00003511398,0.000031277268,0.03842974,0.000012487009,0.00022158537,0.07352979,0.88494503,0.0001287983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013643524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03708121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91296476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039191803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011935655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98048955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W335128631","doi":"","title":"Is the Law of Contract Seriously Defective if the Court is Unable to award Restitutionary Damages for Breach of Contract? EST-CE QUE LE DROIT DES CONTRATS EST DÉFECTUEUX SI LE TRIBUNAL EST DANS L'IMPOSSIBILITÉ D'ACCORDER LA RESTITUTION DES DOMMAGES ET INTÉRÊTS POUR LA RUPTURE DE CONTRAT?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Breach of contract; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.016700901849583984,"score_gpt":0.3119117633153267,"score_spread":0.2952108614657427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W335128631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79297864,0.0013317534,0.0061286474,0.09970166,0.00019711304,0.0025907515,0.0019357916,0.000047978534,0.09508768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950924,0.00015636461,0.00064504705,0.0032466566,0.00021407356,0.00011794304,0.000011278573,0.000017627573,0.00049858773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965507,0.0006952661,0.00052682264,0.000602451,0.0005445927,0.0010802024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959719,0.0015616566,0.00035877473,0.00039334618,0.0011085764,0.00060571666],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045258794,0.00031209982,0.00045868018,0.000086441054,0.004704689,0.0004737413,0.0011980911,0.00035174246,0.000018988048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013832634,0.00025975346,0.00024804883,0.0013582357,0.0122291455,0.0009826756,0.00005827262,0.00049518637,0.0000046370856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064767744,0.00021034414,0.003485984,0.00003089011,0.00004165062,0.000011014397,0.03718924,0.00025916286,0.008489297,0.9455208,0.0010144488,0.0036823878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002949339,0.000577064,0.46716836,0.000556718,0.00040044307,0.000113003356,0.05969396,0.0014233569,0.01188503,0.27243912,0.18160422,0.0011894087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64183336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59848666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6730817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011483709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016065571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33548064","doi":"10.29173/alr271","title":"The Fiduciary Explanation for Presumed Undue Influence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Undue influence; Obligation; Law; Supreme court; Test (biology); Law and economics; Database transaction; Common law; Political science; Economics; Business; Duty; Computer science","score_opus":0.037423114699157746,"score_gpt":0.3697349284908482,"score_spread":0.33231181379169045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33548064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055439137,0.17077549,0.00022796895,0.11843326,0.0005679338,0.005262261,0.000021873966,0.0000830625,0.6990842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9284923,0.04905433,0.00021833503,0.008345134,0.00054615457,0.0013085332,0.000022338985,0.000014158536,0.011998696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934065,0.00008115307,0.00015370912,0.00008296807,0.00012092155,0.00022058692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988003,0.0007933625,0.00007492899,0.00019912819,0.00005769991,0.00007459684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078374427,0.000049696555,0.000080840335,0.0000030788922,0.00080886006,0.000042729436,0.0002354557,0.000028420132,0.00004320526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005203936,0.00003291904,0.000054028784,0.000107622356,0.00009167522,0.00027849834,0.000017370181,0.00004321677,0.00012303637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.1655996e-7,0.000009717918,0.00012050344,0.00006953508,0.0000043945797,5.9562484e-9,0.00036077245,2.4768954e-7,0.00000273644,0.98779094,0.0061418545,0.0054987953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027287877,0.0000024118606,0.00037910414,0.00011577233,0.00001991167,1.7493805e-7,0.000031229192,0.0000020109358,0.000010166647,0.0012013343,0.99815935,0.000051271873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00936424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017085081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99201745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027648386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004171572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W337012207","doi":"","title":"\"The harshness and injustice of the common law rule...has frequenly been commented upon\": DebatingContributory Negligence in Canada, 1914-1949","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Legislation; Political science; Plaintiff; Common law; Statute; Injustice; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01586883990437358,"score_gpt":0.2562552275807659,"score_spread":0.24038638767639234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W337012207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522354,0.0004980197,0.000055377484,0.025647385,0.00035895067,0.00049979094,0.000060483268,0.00001421471,0.020630404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982346,0.000085295665,0.00006370951,0.0013654989,0.00012927262,0.000019535926,0.0000014806276,0.00000869378,0.00009190378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833196,0.00033889382,0.00040890623,0.00011590168,0.00042193165,0.00038238545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864495,0.0005029776,0.00029993948,0.00021727152,0.00017428375,0.00016058913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007959752,0.00010067221,0.0001674128,0.0000128767415,0.0029887813,0.00030120663,0.00066530675,0.000055502962,0.00004458853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009670196,0.00006623785,0.000041297997,0.0002025902,0.0005271664,0.0002497519,0.00013603718,0.00044818548,0.000003370565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016831298,0.000105699546,0.04728346,0.000019580453,0.000052027062,0.000010133829,0.00667243,0.00016145778,0.00084269186,0.93155634,0.0042387014,0.00904063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012114027,0.000056539717,0.15516236,0.0002373037,0.00009199358,0.000041363197,0.01602229,0.0009099045,0.0009660101,0.048280276,0.7765166,0.0005039075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98225105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8832761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030237128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064693706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33811915","doi":"","title":"The Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Duty; Bad faith; Good faith","score_opus":0.0097317228422958,"score_gpt":0.24778381147473308,"score_spread":0.23805208863243726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33811915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8591524,0.000041291907,0.00015132663,0.019458676,0.000022755348,0.000084832165,0.0000043631667,0.0000053173408,0.12107905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985633,0.00005448513,0.000046042223,0.000042580377,0.000012212887,0.0000030872734,3.2251588e-8,7.5279837e-7,0.0012775232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997508,0.000014923032,0.000054281172,0.00003830959,0.00006859055,0.000073107476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976665,0.00013760397,0.000016014028,0.000044157754,0.000012085362,0.00002349648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014560505,0.000014124469,0.000024349392,0.0000030490967,0.00011864662,0.0000071213194,0.00006649354,0.000007270843,0.000019582012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027465358,0.00000661823,0.0000040876803,0.00004711719,0.000048907852,0.000025717869,0.000015877156,0.000012622216,7.1168313e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.340892e-7,0.0000025554978,0.05773807,7.652861e-7,0.0000014136695,1.1870147e-7,0.00050116784,7.683087e-7,0.0001584349,0.9243693,0.00033512313,0.01689156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024812698,0.0000068965496,0.22126958,0.000015703803,0.000002668046,1.533654e-7,0.013347269,0.00004607891,0.0010023479,0.011643287,0.7523213,0.00009660177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98346215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99924076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.912726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005429887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000354081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091254584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W33884038","doi":"10.29173/alr308","title":"Distinguishing Charity and Politics: The Judicial Thinking Behind the Doctrine of Political Purposes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Politics; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Political question; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04765839451083664,"score_gpt":0.33805393874929457,"score_spread":0.2903955442384579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W33884038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079164974,0.039157193,0.000019495546,0.20206046,0.00017081253,0.0015081355,0.000020628795,0.00003790371,0.6778604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855288,0.008868353,0.000047847654,0.0047348985,0.00037314,0.00002396813,0.0000023889077,0.0000051706693,0.00041540957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891037,0.00016799834,0.0002510444,0.00013352443,0.00025977654,0.0002773058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855477,0.000942247,0.00010303915,0.0002443379,0.0000703859,0.00008524351],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006874777,0.00007647622,0.00018962074,0.0000050034078,0.0016202421,0.000046456382,0.00038632695,0.000033036373,0.000054285112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096724776,0.000041916508,0.00007232339,0.0001083314,0.00095271214,0.000086924214,0.00012177581,0.00016189368,0.0000095578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.7063757e-7,0.00001319119,0.00081376685,0.000065677996,0.0000072030175,4.5592537e-7,0.0017604019,2.7904045e-8,8.9003873e-7,0.9967243,0.000263823,0.00035000566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046352856,0.0000082918405,0.0026239122,0.00032697854,0.000070064634,0.000010360425,0.00014070507,0.0000037467466,0.000010888017,0.026326751,0.9703554,0.000076582844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16422409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02219978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97039753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002279775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088581764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35092801","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1268","title":"Book Notes: Seeking Civility: Common Courtesy and the Common Law, by George W. Jarecke and Nancy K. Plant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Courtesy; George (robot); Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.01566589053669137,"score_gpt":0.28606355857332383,"score_spread":0.27039766803663245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35092801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03947788,0.01988004,0.0018551978,0.02574488,0.00030411832,0.00067185285,0.00013528853,0.00009669318,0.91183406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937419,0.0019122442,0.0001329628,0.0035674286,0.0002707034,0.000005152162,0.000006423719,0.000012815736,0.0003503678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850374,0.00020325564,0.00033444655,0.00018017527,0.00036213623,0.00041625506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987415,0.0005814709,0.00019500234,0.00017137936,0.000054131597,0.0002565085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024358646,0.00013406879,0.00023250705,0.000018314466,0.0031539225,0.0004156905,0.00027323008,0.00010655523,0.000074340765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032304895,0.000096578115,0.00006071899,0.00007901394,0.000844028,0.00029468394,0.00009831511,0.0005009005,0.0000064609144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039318846,0.00004536536,0.0026710206,0.000007064158,0.00002227624,0.000011028223,0.0026268007,9.233154e-7,0.00008120243,0.9903443,0.0022284319,0.0019222542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012361798,0.000041239302,0.001441137,0.00010188355,0.00005402625,0.0001291531,0.0016539004,0.00020825684,0.0001249853,0.09385395,0.9009163,0.00023901052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06894745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41664428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95426404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067302186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035416466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W352683167","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-2421","title":"Civil servants and their constitutions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil servants; Political science; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.1336717964290577,"score_gpt":0.36760409474230565,"score_spread":0.23393229831324797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W352683167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09375413,0.32769877,0.0017280967,0.08250283,0.000576425,0.0034744255,0.00058694836,0.00048240367,0.48919597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6244381,0.35353565,0.0025414142,0.0036767605,0.0014576567,0.00011263313,0.00004360333,0.0000169147,0.014177256],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993855,0.000070602975,0.00017619056,0.00014677469,0.00006377868,0.00015718443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951136,0.000091455186,0.00006301449,0.00017980502,0.000036969734,0.000117415955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024582798,0.00007382694,0.00015851078,0.000016766973,0.00045922943,0.000039995335,0.00014427172,0.00003946257,0.0004926753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029787674,0.000054096876,0.000048147635,0.00021348454,0.00022481826,0.0001277963,0.000035109388,0.000093445255,0.00018489706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.087878e-7,0.00058780774,0.005903792,0.00016701425,0.000025871906,0.0000014029255,0.0054642237,0.0000025399386,0.0003119915,0.2106064,0.037347604,0.73958063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064007814,0.0000034901498,0.0006759399,0.00006189099,0.000008415133,8.8692843e-7,0.00013887946,0.00009989676,0.0000025836277,0.00025913402,0.99861526,0.00006963426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003591077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076377545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96126765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002386696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024543968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53944486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W353839816","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1061","title":"Panhandling for Change in Canadian Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06495406747716567,"score_gpt":0.39219049383555005,"score_spread":0.32723642635838435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W353839816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5329887,0.00015932917,0.000004489007,0.07095562,0.000085273845,0.00028116343,0.000042904885,0.000007360466,0.39547512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992467,0.00010826432,0.000046215537,0.0041844277,0.002872803,0.000005482916,5.710812e-7,0.0000037793563,0.00031149603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994858,0.000028271626,0.00013749886,0.000040444254,0.00008183844,0.00022617329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997181,0.000023819019,0.00004808605,0.000019824782,0.00004156121,0.00014860457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036795807,0.000035181663,0.00009759794,0.000042417578,0.0006041095,0.000059233007,0.00007923296,0.00006094708,0.000040738778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011656128,0.000033170963,0.00004828682,0.00008157386,0.000115177114,0.00015651798,0.000003390504,0.00007723749,0.0000020622265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004182012,0.00000850713,0.00010648302,0.0000025327897,0.000003115382,9.0426073e-7,0.0193913,2.9435415e-7,0.0000043432356,0.9727053,0.00006350014,0.007709508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002172081,0.000015991753,0.0013864562,0.0000066300922,0.0000048694046,9.707549e-7,0.0005330756,0.0000048324205,0.0000035589762,0.019316355,0.97846484,0.000045202378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9358743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93582416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97840136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012435537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032865346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46463826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W379734076","doi":"","title":"Studies on the Quebec law of trust","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Thomson/Carswell eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07791222735974011,"score_gpt":0.3456610472913911,"score_spread":0.26774881993165095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W379734076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059071655,0.0005925205,0.000002847831,0.0022621294,0.00024118659,0.0007344268,0.00006789325,0.00009061303,0.99541765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049007338,0.00014619202,0.000050583192,0.0010540682,0.0013154378,0.000080927064,0.000007839974,0.00004176262,0.94829583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980417,0.00017483832,0.0004533152,0.00035621904,0.0006255106,0.0003484529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801284,0.0006180039,0.00041293108,0.00068360864,0.0001758504,0.000096742915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008707976,0.00028957473,0.0004728814,0.00005392222,0.0008229553,0.00007052318,0.00082294206,0.0002957933,0.0001811162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006945521,0.00020314685,0.00027734414,0.000047662408,0.0017921051,0.000037871414,0.00015927883,0.00050838984,0.00030032318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067676106,0.000017737031,6.0559984e-7,0.000023631148,0.000086426175,0.000001369669,0.012002944,0.0000059317354,0.00001250548,0.9551014,0.029619291,0.0031214398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085313965,0.000026468066,0.0000025782404,0.00013920663,0.00008566208,2.686888e-7,0.0028691383,0.0000024287374,0.00030569333,0.036356766,0.9599115,0.00021494004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046478817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07111886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93029225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003914692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081661757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9458308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W394838549","doi":"","title":"L'article 1437 du Code civil du Québec: de l'art de lire un article qui surprend","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006549709771665606,"score_gpt":0.18297352920376822,"score_spread":0.1764238194321026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W394838549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8318565,0.008394615,0.0016652215,0.014803092,0.00042050472,0.00023650676,0.00004478502,0.00013163323,0.14244714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9598658,0.00062534766,0.0009999382,0.0005862884,0.00033316857,0.000023726358,0.0000061519654,0.000022491251,0.037537057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748206,0.00042351265,0.00032883533,0.0004684662,0.00048900314,0.0008081007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834824,0.00022105922,0.00018511778,0.00036862525,0.00017366586,0.00070328964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064051675,0.00026318777,0.00024212307,0.00006863953,0.008639217,0.0001244261,0.00043090206,0.00026493424,0.00065439794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019278572,0.0003188341,0.00024607632,0.0005674941,0.0010132439,0.00060023513,0.00015428847,0.0003220783,0.0004320938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010704827,0.00078229886,0.23435514,0.00003285839,0.00019306024,0.00080786867,0.065700874,0.003154106,0.013150655,0.66775286,0.010788631,0.003174603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010153154,0.00006353763,0.03497215,0.000057871093,0.0002303752,0.00057587936,0.032863263,0.0045426525,0.014667577,0.0024675427,0.9080613,0.00048253292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25111493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30062827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89727265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071734763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004455915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W401350563","doi":"","title":"講演 The Canadian Legal System","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"愛知学院大学論叢 法学研究","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.03711435529526692,"score_gpt":0.2711213427919343,"score_spread":0.23400698749666737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W401350563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12083086,0.0007030443,0.000014984314,0.037673097,0.0011634697,0.00073648145,0.00013850101,0.00012848414,0.83861107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621442,0.000109316126,0.000041267955,0.000936751,0.0013790791,0.000051141848,0.0000079066,0.000020128531,0.035310198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979457,0.00018085397,0.00029453723,0.00033748205,0.0005186384,0.00072273443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985778,0.00009919215,0.000116268064,0.00054775126,0.00012985709,0.0005291656],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053708145,0.00018230193,0.0001958641,0.000057989797,0.0058468673,0.00028925316,0.0008686732,0.00020443196,0.00035563848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053994678,0.00013806972,0.00014621642,0.0006125822,0.00068821467,0.0001984105,0.00007540337,0.00038917497,0.0031674067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004042669,0.00004655849,0.0013170397,0.000027841541,0.000053645163,0.00008610463,0.028394774,0.000035074598,0.000026474916,0.89697176,0.072189316,0.0008473665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012365673,0.00001559127,0.0051380205,0.000023649345,0.000029413786,0.00003106755,0.008657374,0.00026377803,0.000021155533,0.000060663475,0.98543376,0.00020185433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8930978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9084785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007463827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019014744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W40669885","doi":"10.29173/alr274","title":"Limitation Periods for the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Laasch v. Turenne","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Enforcement; Medicine; Law; Psychology; Business; Political science; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.06323478730900274,"score_gpt":0.36445672196360046,"score_spread":0.30122193465459773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W40669885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091624603,0.11847742,0.00175273,0.024027208,0.00024821848,0.0051730312,0.000026351878,0.000026966809,0.8493518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687789,0.024218874,0.00051666575,0.0030483673,0.00020528337,0.00058381597,0.000030756513,0.000008033408,0.0026093174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933344,0.00004813934,0.00020809357,0.000074984695,0.00014620411,0.00018915006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914074,0.00042511214,0.000115890354,0.00019414184,0.00006844483,0.00005569978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069088506,0.000058993024,0.00012755145,0.0000047983676,0.00033733452,0.000017398279,0.00019199419,0.000027125001,0.0003451381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000168467,0.000037579066,0.00010387556,0.00011677806,0.00009003033,0.0001606504,0.00002473133,0.00003584102,0.000040832576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.698005e-7,0.00002508521,0.00013286792,0.00017281937,0.000015648277,2.2807192e-9,0.0008085294,5.971481e-7,0.0000044072544,0.9915582,0.0033598025,0.0039212685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061109444,0.000011227754,0.000073104246,0.00015435042,0.00008529186,1.0546065e-7,0.00020869319,0.000008176782,0.00003119503,0.0010648888,0.9982519,0.000049923285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00818198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004218967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027415255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028616621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200555366","doi":"10.1017/9781108779364.005","title":"The Path from <i>Rodriguez</i> to Bill C-14 and Beyond","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Bill of rights; Parliament; Criminal code; Constitution; Criminal law; Politics","score_opus":0.021378780901432363,"score_gpt":0.22378415176216063,"score_spread":0.20240537086072827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200555366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025409725,0.00030142162,0.000103078804,0.0011160298,0.00018912561,0.00039925502,0.0005861767,0.00006353964,0.9969873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018325757,0.00066961686,0.00010672803,0.00036808712,0.00027673302,0.0000016744227,0.000033470904,0.000019735906,0.9966914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886835,0.000054050997,0.00011883376,0.0004264466,0.0002858393,0.0002465061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882054,0.0002048708,0.00010205058,0.00044832667,0.00015980081,0.00026439043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014275234,0.00018190032,0.0001999869,0.000032626052,0.0013031176,0.00019119692,0.00050951587,0.00021536835,0.00000821085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022005366,0.00015205298,0.000105712075,0.000013350706,0.0004062584,0.000055912657,0.00048619977,0.000292152,0.000018430923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009507183,0.0000033250549,0.0000019822335,0.0000030890878,0.000039382056,0.00002733539,0.0004941402,2.641747e-7,0.000017983803,0.948503,0.048214946,0.0026850547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012560021,0.000009120161,0.000022931743,0.00003244119,0.00007726876,4.6504667e-7,0.0005667813,0.000002682387,0.000028092647,0.00016089818,0.9987533,0.00022038956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005548483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062222354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9505384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012422446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020232091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205149261","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3949810","title":"The Limits of Public Contract Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Public law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03204163839887879,"score_gpt":0.32003573056107626,"score_spread":0.28799409216219746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205149261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26110223,0.023829296,0.0033915795,0.22349147,0.0005369633,0.00029127084,0.0000074189807,0.00006086152,0.4872889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98755336,0.008232947,0.000017381164,0.00013834372,0.00025138282,0.0000028450056,5.989147e-7,0.000004380643,0.0037987337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983219,0.00016574346,0.00015762507,0.00006864132,0.00023967908,0.0010464016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993322,0.00016381871,0.00010671144,0.00011205826,0.0002163208,0.000068907335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002292118,0.000040039005,0.00006759012,0.00000934995,0.0011468777,0.00014377147,0.00027457715,0.000036276917,0.000038747705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021354352,0.00002830469,0.00007817249,0.00018105128,0.00016706501,0.00013722462,0.000017279763,0.0006403174,0.000013847755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013271527,0.000024133267,0.00019090387,3.0098826e-7,0.000029411327,4.575605e-7,0.00023813824,7.6555915e-7,0.00022406055,0.9815164,0.00004513313,0.017728927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012659328,0.000019437915,0.0003062015,0.0000025262048,0.000009333941,0.000022085562,0.0049285926,0.000004896168,0.00022028912,0.34695873,0.64735824,0.000043088807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061054586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07124876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72645116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024875728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004191557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9456985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205175468","doi":"10.21638/spbu25.2020.301","title":"The principle of good faith and fair dealing in English contract law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pravovedenie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; English law; Fair dealing; Faith; Civil code; Sociology; Civil procedure; Scholarship; Political science; Commercial law; Comparative law; Philosophy; Good faith; Theology","score_opus":0.027510113913749003,"score_gpt":0.30852036392860105,"score_spread":0.281010250014852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205175468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8339094,0.000610385,0.00016422622,0.014101005,0.00007699473,0.00055794045,0.000020933921,0.000078480996,0.15048064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992305,0.00010406635,0.00015452622,0.0002794086,0.00012657442,0.00001468083,9.565696e-7,0.0000050242534,0.00008427503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993174,0.000064765794,0.00016621687,0.00012725414,0.00015716343,0.00016720057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943787,0.00025708447,0.000075097494,0.00009075639,0.000054087875,0.00008509436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004026627,0.00005007143,0.00009263573,0.0000066568796,0.00029998086,0.00008087284,0.0001896472,0.00004102364,0.000012972344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034948604,0.000038706683,0.000024639126,0.00013770977,0.0001809092,0.00011623993,0.00006451666,0.00012069703,0.0000037962361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075782195,0.000016175236,0.007773256,0.0000061593278,0.0000055590685,6.807196e-7,0.008911754,0.000008479656,0.00026874346,0.98210484,0.000022089067,0.0008746889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031208433,0.000022751892,0.011478104,0.00000957489,0.000008001363,1.4464418e-7,0.002964917,0.00027341844,0.00059699884,0.002593619,0.9816522,0.000088167704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021872616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074841026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98163015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017936713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073861454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4176305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205553498","doi":"10.7202/1084134ar","title":"Creative and Responsive Advocacy for Reconciliation: The Application of Gladue Principles in Administrative Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Alienation; Indigenous; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Creativity; Political science; Law; Administrative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07833572260904663,"score_gpt":0.37257740844483894,"score_spread":0.2942416858357923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205553498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12325148,0.0005853322,0.0035925284,0.03713474,0.00017430184,0.0017427996,0.00026776476,0.00002965001,0.8332214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973581,0.00012905298,0.0017217867,0.00025439964,0.00011619746,0.00008358412,0.0000052120095,0.0000052617306,0.00032643837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999021,0.00022673982,0.00029045268,0.0001449123,0.00017342063,0.00014348279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986099,0.0005359717,0.00022394251,0.00011851466,0.0004421827,0.0000694953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089472457,0.0000648751,0.0001282221,0.000016822472,0.0020445022,0.00005410864,0.00013341988,0.000054758882,0.00002686245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003381368,0.000050604576,0.000052609837,0.00018370643,0.00031309447,0.00016727668,0.00003227151,0.00014836044,0.0000015955422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040584197,0.000038820068,0.0001468896,0.0000048865672,0.000012614222,0.0000014896531,0.003244311,0.000019836529,0.00016024157,0.9939398,0.000015791,0.0023746996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040720782,0.00005503989,0.002622904,0.000026243384,0.000017315213,0.000013865841,0.015089654,0.00009216963,0.0037930345,0.02658275,0.9512202,0.00007960507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023432581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.096324734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9673571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009429046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013902194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205606591","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u199194","title":"Lefroy, Augustus Henry Frazer, (21 June 1852–8 March 1919), KC 1908; MA; Professor of Roman and English Law and General Jurisprudence, and Special Lecturer on English Constitutional law, Colonial law, and Federal law, University of Toronto, since 1899","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Colonialism; Philosophy; Classics; History; Political science","score_opus":0.013931929720551763,"score_gpt":0.2734808719924744,"score_spread":0.25954894227192266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205606591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15836208,0.004525007,0.000019917963,0.00061365607,0.0011155744,0.0011720301,0.0013424797,0.000066658395,0.83278257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9304011,0.021248788,0.0007692316,0.0009508957,0.0074238167,0.000016962826,0.00033004806,0.00005400271,0.038805194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971278,0.00026307828,0.0004527725,0.00079853326,0.00077336776,0.00058446964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822915,0.00031127277,0.00035167823,0.0002869131,0.0004634548,0.00035751457],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005679612,0.00041974356,0.00083643437,0.000053582557,0.0016334107,0.00023116206,0.00036154414,0.0007839719,0.0001611681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069381065,0.0004408227,0.000102442624,0.00013682591,0.007007054,0.00043678566,0.00042452483,0.0006628252,0.0000011746182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022022879,0.00013762034,0.00068830256,0.00021515327,0.000092872615,0.000016359258,0.0060290596,0.0000020973657,0.000011263399,0.9742555,0.017770097,0.0005614184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012808262,0.00016830642,0.0028895412,0.00031295992,0.000115641036,0.000004918276,0.00096177316,0.000008138219,0.000041495347,0.002969605,0.9907616,0.00048519025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051967178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41602537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025354672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006796984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206255502","doi":"10.1002/iir.1446","title":"The promise and perils of regulating <i>ipso facto</i> clauses","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; De facto; Creditor; Law and economics; Directive; Scope (computer science); Counterparty; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Actuarial science; Debt; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.03841956026906228,"score_gpt":0.38076829224058667,"score_spread":0.3423487319715244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206255502","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067803115,0.41085857,0.00021173831,0.13762866,0.0007531635,0.00113503,0.00007254747,0.00007962641,0.38145757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7097979,0.284257,0.00056574994,0.0010599652,0.00018099426,0.000060154627,0.000009168642,0.000006724927,0.0040623406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992584,0.00007139937,0.0002394471,0.00011306905,0.00023154981,0.00008611978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993082,0.00015996263,0.00012564969,0.00012682096,0.00024331294,0.000036039604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037780055,0.000046451223,0.000099008335,0.000007298109,0.00026640293,0.000040814863,0.00020412791,0.000020742225,0.00013254846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053781754,0.000033708486,0.000058211095,0.000116296775,0.00013603755,0.00010836342,0.0000682429,0.00006207224,0.000007913333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026678151,0.000060086444,0.0027021081,0.00026324656,0.000047192538,0.0000017872429,0.0011703101,0.0000013994929,0.0007791553,0.88252187,0.0035007468,0.108949445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042153846,0.0000033115782,0.0016897242,0.0005470884,0.000011055132,0.0000021951,0.00020196124,0.000007903257,0.00020788937,0.002807737,0.9944353,0.000043695418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011841756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029532542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99093455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002439663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013440131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2048983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206569663","doi":"10.1017/9781108606462.021","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206569663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024993552,0.00009216014,0.0007617439,0.000121078076,0.0010742764,0.00052258326,0.00039964163,0.000068098954,0.9967105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016823798,0.00023037005,0.000019908555,0.000102615806,0.0004816992,0.0000017692024,0.0000725004,0.000019033556,0.9822483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874145,0.00013752861,0.00010559282,0.00037223706,0.00029489337,0.00034828298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.00006893886,0.00014846036,0.0004343169,0.00013297697,0.0001737184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012737447,0.0001739766,0.00023954261,0.00008710378,0.0005774884,0.00010308849,0.00082794135,0.0004025431,0.00008085685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010849748,0.0002112687,0.00014829778,0.000040509865,0.0002851073,0.000091724985,0.00028449946,0.00041884778,0.0024215307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007589759,0.000008544991,0.000003831911,0.000021782593,0.000023286479,0.0000038784656,0.00018192975,0.000008983049,0.000005154923,0.3882697,0.6112349,0.00023041076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955167,0.0000070813667,0.000024606443,0.00003144459,0.000031978958,2.8661168e-7,0.00047870295,0.000018955674,0.000027432096,4.5485612e-7,0.998931,0.00025256057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012339986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053883246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38826922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028266988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005811423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210543670","doi":"10.1017/9781108329453.008","title":"Accounting governance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business ethics; Accounting; Shareholder; Political science; China; Corporate law; International business; Business; Public relations; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.028653698711207733,"score_gpt":0.23835491570914522,"score_spread":0.20970121699793748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210543670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012406083,0.000058585905,0.000102910344,0.00009884181,0.0001841485,0.0002789209,0.0001987652,0.00013999418,0.99881375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030676683,0.00018432653,0.000087502456,0.00008837625,0.0007187387,5.9295013e-7,0.000010973867,0.000024079058,0.9958177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892336,0.000021763544,0.00011433403,0.00035292952,0.00032269096,0.00026490176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903554,0.000051246774,0.00023467686,0.00035891516,0.00018787617,0.00013177015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015217827,0.0001751667,0.00018582447,0.00003257355,0.0007835671,0.000088786976,0.0006564401,0.00028501058,0.00006373861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017601586,0.00021994549,0.00013714746,0.000008914148,0.0005538911,0.00012331692,0.00028328935,0.0002774782,0.00014873191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066621265,0.000002684332,0.0000014093167,0.000009550479,0.000022298576,0.000013296979,0.00023814387,1.254186e-7,0.0000041887056,0.92259735,0.07638782,0.00071646733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011541063,0.000006824725,0.000015692278,0.000059789425,0.000056644978,5.725854e-7,0.000109564906,0.0000053379435,0.000019651581,0.000058484005,0.9993032,0.00024879916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019886987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012975944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9229154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029527227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023317429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8969117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210613344","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2021.15","title":"Commerce","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.014042337162978286,"score_gpt":0.26799811505427956,"score_spread":0.2539557778913013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210613344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015293817,0.0009658259,0.00017860855,0.100523464,0.0049730525,0.00017390728,0.0030007095,0.000027190274,0.87486345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7024886,0.00038600538,0.0010953592,0.0066540716,0.001716884,0.00003417859,0.00038900165,0.000043946682,0.287192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973435,0.00012023452,0.0005838501,0.0004880293,0.0007225402,0.00074186793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966765,0.00015288353,0.00024171069,0.00037509733,0.0014294712,0.0011243239],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045023725,0.00023827817,0.00027748686,0.00024759732,0.00032618846,0.00018327423,0.0013349304,0.00030379937,0.01023048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031982092,0.00034923246,0.0002708808,0.00034870554,0.00077257573,0.000458552,0.00012274922,0.00043058695,0.00036048112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007218183,0.00007750863,0.0025075637,0.00001568622,0.00029789473,0.00028924458,0.0013883759,0.00013250054,0.00005463585,0.96534574,0.02535505,0.004528565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030179432,0.000019393023,0.0029557666,0.00018747988,0.00004276827,0.00013335988,0.000984651,0.00076585886,0.00023717529,0.020228775,0.973825,0.000317974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7083082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9419171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94846994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005561641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005023733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210620352","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2021.69.4.nitikman","title":"Equitable Rescission of Contracts for Mistake in Canada After Great Peace: Whither Solle v. Butcher?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rescission; Butcher; Mistake; Context (archaeology); Law; Equity (law); Supreme court; Political science; Appeal; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.021805855462882967,"score_gpt":0.24005746707332293,"score_spread":0.21825161161043996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210620352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8575388,0.0029887622,0.00020043274,0.10271536,0.0010900408,0.0008155934,0.0018994518,0.000011404252,0.03274015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95327586,0.00012044841,0.0005278567,0.00061589666,0.00037718174,0.000063526284,0.000022336035,0.000030450306,0.04496645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770963,0.000115991075,0.00046372955,0.00028303242,0.00017452336,0.0012530771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715096,0.00014533242,0.00019662153,0.0002930669,0.00044658483,0.0017674239],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077654276,0.00015390819,0.00032661168,0.00014861954,0.00056690356,0.000096904696,0.00035801477,0.00014248748,0.001180307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058322423,0.00016780275,0.000104611856,0.0005081768,0.000084172505,0.00017579424,0.00002403955,0.00034060795,0.000003473585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022836615,0.00018460464,0.14468518,0.0003986297,0.00026717992,0.004918105,0.037742883,0.00089903374,0.0028437271,0.025702931,0.74561,0.036519337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054656964,0.000018848728,0.011615058,0.00015118677,0.00002540206,0.00004745238,0.006323892,0.00009365032,0.00020344727,0.0011498964,0.9795728,0.00025180777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99769527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23396277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042614485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015430485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210863005","doi":"10.1093/indlaw/dwac001","title":"The Future of the Employment Contract","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Scholarship; Common law; Closing (real estate); Fiduciary; Law; Work (physics); Judicial opinion; Political science; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Liability; Sociology; Good faith; Duty; Engineering","score_opus":0.04719369154176292,"score_gpt":0.31007707972190857,"score_spread":0.26288338818014567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210863005","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33838308,0.0015595816,0.000016144699,0.4061241,0.012899308,0.0011824435,0.00011322363,0.000036916266,0.23968521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573666,0.000038856888,0.0000036673707,0.000257432,0.0029881005,0.000011814681,2.3071044e-7,0.0000031650568,0.0009600658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998769,0.00035580902,0.00018594555,0.00004736817,0.00048860145,0.00015328979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994499,0.00012902622,0.0001984489,0.00011949246,0.000046689067,0.000056412333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013311096,0.000035951743,0.000057004105,0.0000057493567,0.0062984657,0.000105894986,0.00056407275,0.00003646911,0.00035068658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042234056,0.000019168185,0.00009559223,0.00015671668,0.00018213088,0.00005096801,0.00009631606,0.0006518875,0.0000018878919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018497118,0.00003056448,0.00057015615,7.525638e-8,0.00001555115,8.1563576e-7,0.00083375664,0.000060639595,0.000037263566,0.96771616,0.011966331,0.018750202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002394254,0.000019845153,0.00029951427,0.0000016537475,0.000008698603,0.000005969732,0.0035101157,0.0000016234011,0.000042929096,0.0038815425,0.9919618,0.000026875545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00257427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042856373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011517966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029963732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210955357","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564","title":"Dimensions of Private Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Tort; Private law; Property (philosophy); Law; Relation (database); Philosophy of law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Comparative law; Computer science; Philosophy; Liability; Data mining","score_opus":0.027447626405022383,"score_gpt":0.24287288078684666,"score_spread":0.21542525438182428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210955357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009551626,0.0000566646,0.00011201227,0.000039954662,0.000113763046,0.00040026667,0.00022997709,0.00006793585,0.9988839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014783236,0.00012879843,0.00016381456,0.00007919078,0.00007595484,9.2145996e-7,0.000024563533,0.000017126535,0.9980313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989652,0.00010355851,0.00014580315,0.00027087395,0.0002766907,0.0002378423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989893,0.000081612015,0.00020779982,0.00040773192,0.0001506061,0.00016294791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014916225,0.00015168179,0.0002538142,0.0000567363,0.00054637284,0.000023640752,0.0004888183,0.00027417947,0.000006211918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013568495,0.00016027581,0.00016266157,0.000021797334,0.0007570906,0.00006359808,0.0001882862,0.0002637465,0.00001367678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046885584,0.00001268738,8.5683575e-7,0.000020907633,0.00003272515,0.000008864692,0.00015808157,0.0000010219438,0.000024506919,0.89533883,0.104343444,0.00005339509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015269243,0.000009954626,0.000002557267,0.000049679693,0.000099000616,4.269581e-7,0.00008179994,0.0000015447389,0.00016618453,0.00013547509,0.9991175,0.0001831992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016837032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058702553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89520335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023948286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005373921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6535858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211105127","doi":"10.1090/surv/148","title":"Ordering Braids","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Mathematical surveys and monographs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Braid; Mathematics; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.04144003946280374,"score_gpt":0.29742853788056206,"score_spread":0.25598849841775834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211105127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004860895,0.0005204949,0.006680647,0.0003545229,0.000058753,0.0003635286,0.000047042715,0.00012550046,0.9913634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011908741,0.0034684492,0.002094971,0.00012231678,0.0003716116,0.00007642028,0.000057983652,0.00005768908,0.9818418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985805,0.00022657868,0.00027793014,0.0002821235,0.00031864847,0.0003142006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900275,0.00037138705,0.000094261544,0.00023633476,0.00006022331,0.00023502631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015440511,0.00019266848,0.0003429803,0.00008464817,0.0006155694,0.00011871092,0.00022481516,0.0002824559,0.0002834727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010799944,0.00017091114,0.00014844837,0.00014663662,0.00054243725,0.00007162082,0.00009893303,0.0002604289,0.000115714996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.60724e-7,0.000053188658,0.0001044812,0.000077610675,0.00004391026,0.0000050252365,0.0019589216,2.1286212e-7,0.0000010035449,0.9636742,0.014914453,0.019166317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072377305,0.000014064844,0.00031331033,0.000057492874,0.000022210284,0.0000025249044,0.00008338837,0.000014889834,7.723903e-7,0.15240626,0.84677744,0.00023529038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019371945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032362738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.831863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035600217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017154262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6969554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212915363","doi":"10.1111/raju.12334","title":"Bentham’s Public Utilitarianism and Its Jurisprudential Significance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Morality; Jurisprudence; Jeremy bentham; Law; Philosophy of law; Legislator; Normative; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Public law; Legislation","score_opus":0.03822280387896085,"score_gpt":0.31937847158636057,"score_spread":0.28115566770739975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212915363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.624385,0.0026031986,0.0035491195,0.07657706,0.0007245364,0.0007818909,0.00013151015,0.00027707813,0.29097065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950623,0.00033193413,0.00029117137,0.00030779676,0.00032891973,0.00003637901,0.000010124555,0.000006390843,0.0036249654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990873,0.000088801586,0.00013454213,0.00023272353,0.00022414427,0.00023252289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995209,0.000054971457,0.000040433697,0.00014293054,0.00012886916,0.00011192693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024182723,0.00006323849,0.00008322206,0.000019707815,0.0006928053,0.00024668506,0.00012743636,0.000065238615,0.00044830734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012021665,0.000068676825,0.00003601266,0.0002227395,0.000077384895,0.00028573204,0.00006650489,0.00008675011,0.00010087281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001079418,0.000035086756,0.00036047024,0.0000050618532,0.000010734714,0.000004357929,0.0022084194,5.408624e-7,0.0044269683,0.9891846,0.001846204,0.0019164833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014825544,0.000007835673,0.003752968,0.0000035582366,0.000014202472,0.0000011278946,0.00093969255,0.00014448795,0.0065320986,0.0034029174,0.9849204,0.0001324472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039706368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004596548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98578167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003734914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034961908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5328568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212990237","doi":"10.5840/raven20111899","title":"Vaughan, Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Raven A Journal of Vexillology","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.1056067301950386,"score_gpt":0.31558579620793453,"score_spread":0.20997906601289593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212990237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46431783,0.00021861456,0.0026933423,0.005035176,0.0008086785,0.00012644503,0.0000016751864,0.000017804736,0.5267804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884554,0.000044930362,0.0032853547,0.00026053295,0.00022533839,0.0000013784643,1.9613097e-7,0.0000042665033,0.0077225743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935156,0.00007351691,0.00022190588,0.00005756323,0.00012888083,0.00016658165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944466,0.000034758246,0.00020082983,0.00008206072,0.00012828763,0.0001093745],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004881321,0.000043521726,0.00012539641,0.00005310132,0.00015219774,0.000010432866,0.0002698608,0.0000676103,0.0018656356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060214235,0.00003681472,0.00008124782,0.00008126305,0.00015102714,0.00009403809,0.000024074985,0.00018101346,0.00007354043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009775417,0.00031720512,0.0403254,0.0000035610856,0.00011279516,0.00011325255,0.11944174,0.0000064644305,0.00039547624,0.8222028,0.008437007,0.008546554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019737358,0.00011410739,0.022304915,0.000004732567,0.000019574394,0.000044323475,0.00093240285,7.454154e-7,0.00009806713,0.019157695,0.95707077,0.000055326465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022652974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073660254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94863373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011106504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042913677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213184069","doi":"10.7202/1027042ar","title":"Fruit Salad","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Orthodoxy; Value (mathematics); Property law; Intellectual property; Alienation; Capital (architecture); Civil code; Revenue; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; History; Accounting","score_opus":0.017902855572112127,"score_gpt":0.27672866652437156,"score_spread":0.2588258109522594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213184069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26564845,0.000031508684,0.0028124359,0.005852721,0.00010387038,0.00016200077,0.000005791623,0.00014344066,0.72523975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98706365,0.000039995753,0.0011052346,0.00035756722,0.0007295537,0.0000257256,0.0000038555077,0.00000869265,0.010665746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935377,0.000050125247,0.00009957899,0.00013967443,0.000104689556,0.00025213836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995289,0.00007259736,0.000040479063,0.00020194083,0.000029759554,0.00012632278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039386665,0.000037340364,0.00008280402,0.000021187341,0.0002846992,0.00005805267,0.0002412067,0.00006398032,0.00021774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013278819,0.00005574953,0.00005589901,0.00015211725,0.0000752965,0.00007731755,0.00002647925,0.000089577494,0.0005991961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.3723867e-7,0.000020977985,0.0046499455,0.000007850793,0.0000033712126,8.821554e-7,0.0015104858,0.000014838956,0.0002474187,0.98238516,0.0017894343,0.009368723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009761563,0.000011245445,0.010965234,0.000014266296,0.000009326992,0.0000018363199,0.00025296357,0.00033149237,0.00012626314,0.13879023,0.84927446,0.0001250412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008045908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006554092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84748507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092528906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042845553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7701654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214916966","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/urj6n","title":"The presumption of resulting trust and beneficiary designations: What’s intention go to do with it?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Beneficiary; Estate; Business; Law and economics; Doctrine; Economics; Law; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.0693087129939688,"score_gpt":0.36272540292457156,"score_spread":0.29341668993060277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214916966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5260075,0.0034164814,0.043017495,0.11999558,0.001411776,0.008120291,0.00011981503,0.0002728502,0.29763827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898463,0.0026741736,0.0022308584,0.00006090535,0.00012261694,0.00017007219,0.000014440575,0.000008793083,0.0048718723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897224,0.000084689316,0.00024122857,0.0002669415,0.0002871895,0.0001477036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875385,0.00017994277,0.00030484816,0.000406507,0.00028884792,0.00006602032],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012036547,0.00009526457,0.000117994314,0.00004467797,0.001333083,0.0009769023,0.00041102155,0.000120829216,0.000015192052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031935537,0.00006399717,0.00003919196,0.000062660496,0.00020300248,0.00030785106,0.00030387752,0.00018060855,0.0000069172615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009694289,0.00009899533,0.0032266278,0.00008429966,0.00009792621,4.8748313e-7,0.022610743,0.0011279089,0.00021074769,0.7215957,0.0022341802,0.24861544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011788793,0.00024216212,0.14646035,0.0046568518,0.0003910776,0.0000024266649,0.14380921,0.0067418986,0.0009746892,0.13675636,0.5572169,0.0015692228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004293843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013929797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58483934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006067688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015165578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223420017","doi":"10.1017/9781009181648.021","title":"Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Achieve Life Sciences (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03060379322728132,"score_gpt":0.26654101504999245,"score_spread":0.23593722182271112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223420017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018334758,0.0001113388,0.00027815276,0.00014650839,0.0007987036,0.00041833927,0.00069718703,0.00008258296,0.9972838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006396562,0.00027659885,0.000016991236,0.000117530355,0.00040805433,0.000005943837,0.00012651522,0.00001945016,0.9926323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858576,0.00022632595,0.00010619413,0.00036870476,0.00037619873,0.00033679645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999142,0.00006711626,0.00014669336,0.00038083192,0.00008144622,0.00018191345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016603972,0.00016038795,0.00020692966,0.00009879691,0.0015221146,0.00008630532,0.0009566841,0.00022623608,0.000617326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001160319,0.00021051001,0.00014947086,0.00005803653,0.00029647836,0.00007425342,0.0005432263,0.00056362775,0.00047267257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007985245,0.000011361243,0.0000017162502,0.000011028277,0.000021526781,0.000010626337,0.0002464813,0.000010417156,0.0000024466763,0.38866514,0.6107159,0.00029535036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016292158,0.00000841706,0.000013641196,0.000009140523,0.000036990183,5.102017e-7,0.001062909,0.00001075713,0.000011231429,6.276571e-7,0.99844223,0.00024063679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01761423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005877361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3886645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004743942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005860197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224095393","doi":"10.1017/9781108290173.017","title":"Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03060379322728132,"score_gpt":0.26654101504999245,"score_spread":0.23593722182271112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224095393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018334758,0.0001113388,0.00027815276,0.00014650839,0.0007987036,0.00041833927,0.00069718703,0.00008258296,0.9972838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006396562,0.00027659885,0.000016991236,0.000117530355,0.00040805433,0.000005943837,0.00012651522,0.00001945016,0.9926323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858576,0.00022632595,0.00010619413,0.00036870476,0.00037619873,0.00033679645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999142,0.00006711626,0.00014669336,0.00038083192,0.00008144622,0.00018191345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016603972,0.00016038795,0.00020692966,0.00009879691,0.0015221146,0.00008630532,0.0009566841,0.00022623608,0.000617326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001160319,0.00021051001,0.00014947086,0.00005803653,0.00029647836,0.00007425342,0.0005432263,0.00056362775,0.00047267257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007985245,0.000011361243,0.0000017162502,0.000011028277,0.000021526781,0.000010626337,0.0002464813,0.000010417156,0.0000024466763,0.38866514,0.6107159,0.00029535036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016292158,0.00000841706,0.000013641196,0.000009140523,0.000036990183,5.102017e-7,0.001062909,0.00001075713,0.000011231429,6.276571e-7,0.99844223,0.00024063679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01761423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005877361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3886645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004743942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005860197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224313367","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.9","title":"Contract as Transfer of Ownership, Even Without Consideration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; sort; Law; Common law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03336708925542781,"score_gpt":0.3160125562178211,"score_spread":0.2826454669623933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224313367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987153,0.0009608324,0.00050265586,0.020667845,0.0005018801,0.0003650114,0.00009166237,0.0000106577545,0.07818412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850124,0.000018484117,0.00010120852,0.00080149074,0.0001264148,0.0000064482447,0.0000011240257,0.000006718638,0.000436874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880964,0.00018453258,0.0003203055,0.000088693734,0.00037623267,0.00022061059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901336,0.00010660521,0.00014430143,0.00010759206,0.0002147698,0.000413345],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008794461,0.00006172021,0.00015683855,0.000068298184,0.0008312207,0.00006530223,0.00034865117,0.000037607857,0.0012915002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010908828,0.000060878574,0.00008707872,0.00016731737,0.00030335036,0.00024829622,0.0000073604137,0.00027105593,0.000007063021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015737227,0.00002220933,0.0046243775,0.000004885148,0.00002355899,0.000049199974,0.0129986685,0.00025038843,0.00090834737,0.9797229,0.00075055915,0.0006291696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042568677,0.00017766064,0.0039733197,0.000038056543,0.00005178809,0.0000812173,0.0036368286,0.000018725563,0.0011599326,0.011382352,0.9788818,0.00017264565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11757578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31971812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97813123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021348467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034786626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229537775","doi":"10.1017/9781139600163.015","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229537775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033347285,0.00006329861,0.00078562077,0.0001112015,0.0008104081,0.0003757862,0.00036771156,0.00008237588,0.99707013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008933154,0.00019274896,0.000039696635,0.000098872704,0.0011568725,0.000002104379,0.00005973012,0.000018485376,0.9894983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00014494616,0.00010834862,0.00037414295,0.00028695448,0.000360626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.000051242267,0.00014685592,0.00040633522,0.00019834762,0.00021557152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857286,0.00017359815,0.00021110065,0.0000863407,0.00095847005,0.00011146012,0.0008660532,0.00039935156,0.0001276099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152395705,0.00020973122,0.0001317593,0.000045465393,0.00064752385,0.000087858054,0.0003040098,0.00033021744,0.0016100289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272979,0.000008916045,0.000001841033,0.0000125013985,0.000022840626,0.0000047836447,0.00024107621,7.516388e-7,0.0000039424745,0.29569677,0.70378184,0.00021645456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015847865,0.00001000528,0.000018129129,0.000029625562,0.000038599803,3.7792682e-7,0.00041646563,0.000010707584,0.000051044135,9.660291e-7,0.9990204,0.00024522492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011503459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29569578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026606026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050177996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229666626","doi":"10.21991/cf29371","title":"De facto and de jure Crown Sovereignty: Reconciliation and Legitimation at the Supreme Court of Canada Ryan","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Political science; Legitimation; De facto; Crown (dentistry); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.014237891509047631,"score_gpt":0.2509128879879251,"score_spread":0.23667499647887746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229666626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74930537,0.0007187653,0.01411107,0.03249913,0.0005357694,0.0013660017,0.00081704906,0.00007251416,0.20057431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974179,0.00008341097,0.0002742633,0.00084115204,0.00005607626,0.000038749204,0.000048825055,0.000004271866,0.001235304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862456,0.00007311683,0.000281787,0.00024728727,0.00035266436,0.0004205647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902594,0.00025692183,0.00016764186,0.00017915497,0.00020144324,0.00016889787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053980615,0.00013544018,0.00016493755,0.000043360913,0.0016541055,0.0000876207,0.00016023195,0.00012120582,0.00034994265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027464816,0.0001181666,0.00004929166,0.00014341643,0.0024965212,0.0003773685,0.00010408129,0.00014334396,0.000010939432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019751105,0.000013592965,0.05664724,0.000015967451,0.000019857313,7.67332e-7,0.00030907968,0.000495725,0.0003845057,0.9384291,0.003246608,0.0004177959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016520844,0.000054407865,0.041533228,0.00016434114,0.000100040816,0.00014457597,0.01137343,0.0048300675,0.0012901032,0.08031553,0.8579206,0.00062162237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06452789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24856935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006756943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049135536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229914185","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2010.21721","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.21801413328612157,"score_gpt":0.36662500854184144,"score_spread":0.14861087525571987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229914185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4611369,0.00010648837,0.00033979223,0.09659471,0.0007439465,0.00025594013,0.0000032144478,0.00018394006,0.4406351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958611,0.0000033617619,0.000777734,0.00031872568,0.0003055198,0.000005488592,0.0000010927747,0.000005065345,0.0027219108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994985,0.00002453718,0.000051488576,0.00011162623,0.0001249388,0.00018889825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997381,0.000034221528,0.000019112951,0.00009222721,0.00001890932,0.00009743978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022734795,0.000040012164,0.000042635005,0.000019905947,0.00039076552,0.000070953676,0.00009083846,0.00006309082,0.00008018538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055119577,0.00004003815,0.000016060774,0.00008154093,0.0003697327,0.00008472188,0.000004741912,0.00015460365,0.00005134754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048210654,0.00009152647,0.0028671145,0.000007901365,0.000005496591,7.882289e-7,0.03882102,3.134276e-7,0.0035132794,0.8210971,0.0039057988,0.12968487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041646222,0.00003215491,0.037692204,0.00006483651,0.000027813687,0.000004465225,0.044660673,0.000067971,0.0007713553,0.0393664,0.8765815,0.00031418237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021530826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002980866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87267566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022622755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049915456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30054918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230353734","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u236809","title":"du-Plat-Taylor, Francis Maurice Gustavus, (1878–22 May 1954), JP Surrey; Chairman: Surrey Quarter Sessions Rating Appeals Cttee, 1942; Mortlake (Surrey) Petty Sessions; Arbitrator","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Art; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027564156381949093,"score_gpt":0.3203772560435976,"score_spread":0.29281309966164853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230353734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026111042,0.007847469,0.0029000535,0.008724536,0.0067764283,0.004243056,0.0033549885,0.0012151593,0.9388273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66291183,0.037008893,0.0021167158,0.004472399,0.022506695,0.0014240507,0.003645177,0.0007299721,0.26518425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892989,0.0009985869,0.002148125,0.0021587396,0.0027897079,0.002605974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993,0.0013322772,0.0015356728,0.0018491255,0.00085646927,0.0014264913],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029980226,0.0014671307,0.002029808,0.00065285445,0.004487819,0.0009911337,0.0022158895,0.001960725,0.002544257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006809413,0.0013329693,0.0008842437,0.0022013274,0.0006115989,0.00091740437,0.00059186574,0.0034543572,0.0010571359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078984995,0.00096181256,0.02755988,0.0010455545,0.00040209742,0.00020713883,0.0106030395,0.000027521546,0.00003198737,0.02827636,0.8948685,0.03593711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006867117,0.00006831146,0.006939181,0.0013025469,0.00024436892,0.000016804495,0.004908588,0.00016893346,0.00003800238,0.00048063515,0.983414,0.0017319144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063009933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009125747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.673643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007421885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020955445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230356737","doi":"10.2307/3504968","title":"10.2307/3504968","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Substantive rights; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.011078781760355644,"score_gpt":0.24298436823929986,"score_spread":0.23190558647894421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230356737","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011108215,0.000011548047,8.362001e-7,0.003105615,0.000001122247,0.00012611768,0.0000069188964,0.000092790804,0.99554425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039254287,6.2528335e-7,0.00008707421,0.00011608238,0.00017994191,0.000019056217,0.0000027999063,0.000005236888,0.99566376],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995072,0.000024043764,0.00006717989,0.000105741485,0.00013056661,0.0001652519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996936,0.00002596138,0.000010055546,0.00012946513,0.000022426393,0.00011854525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012912852,0.000040196355,0.000050413488,0.0000148056415,0.00027030092,0.00004980436,0.0001834897,0.000030051906,0.99260026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020624962,0.000039781953,0.00002699083,0.00018550643,0.0000445653,0.00006486699,0.000016135344,0.000037668276,0.9854494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060513667,0.000033601016,4.6225614e-7,6.780102e-7,0.0000035029805,6.25131e-7,0.00029826592,0.000024874169,0.000019959814,0.0013137542,0.18513381,0.8131644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003493638,0.000011239196,0.00004664364,0.0000017608799,0.000002971441,1.4690764e-7,0.000007091774,0.000014670309,0.000006833134,0.000060007267,0.99975324,0.000060475068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006172575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007429094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8146194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027829321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043439544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20789635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230935746","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.687178","title":"The Legal and Extra-Legal Determinants of Expropriation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Business; Law and economics; Empirical legal studies; Legal research; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.010358406260455814,"score_gpt":0.29343646405189483,"score_spread":0.283078057791439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230935746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98201996,0.001893479,0.000930121,0.00718456,0.000077859666,0.00013836977,0.0000012447931,0.000013552845,0.0077408636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99161667,0.004346361,0.00008359352,0.00002990597,0.0004436812,0.0000042835,1.6200485e-7,0.0000048862867,0.0034704783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986802,0.000069750036,0.00019067425,0.000078113015,0.00021813529,0.0007631471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996118,0.00005571409,0.00013836699,0.000077938486,0.00006353679,0.00005263585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016893725,0.000050747498,0.00006760487,0.000020851376,0.0009175257,0.000108791144,0.000195183,0.000038271257,0.000008958079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000690686,0.000035622397,0.000040286544,0.000088795394,0.0001328615,0.00029117006,0.00001852645,0.00043519295,0.0000059977915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008555442,0.000016036878,0.0010097742,6.222517e-7,0.000008755097,1.6486719e-7,0.000589597,0.0000035987493,0.00024929116,0.83264804,0.000031455587,0.16543414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005197463,0.00013810923,0.004845207,0.000012716842,0.000031719414,0.00009764035,0.0093799615,0.00036237919,0.00069528125,0.11344491,0.8702966,0.00017570767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006855845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031424962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8702652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023439256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013087337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231034483","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190923068.003.0010","title":"Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Restitution; Political science; Immovable property; Law; World War II; Property (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.02550461794556153,"score_gpt":0.21911123230436177,"score_spread":0.19360661435880025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231034483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013281219,0.000017836379,0.00002514444,0.00023546696,0.00014855288,0.00028616373,0.00021246441,0.000044980967,0.9990161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014129503,0.0001238831,0.000041496074,0.0001326757,0.0001221505,2.3556916e-7,0.000014646878,0.000014218852,0.9981378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992036,0.00001549566,0.00007370397,0.00022253994,0.000288805,0.00019584334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936885,0.00004586647,0.000102929574,0.00027793957,0.00007594776,0.00012844226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000056315468,0.00012539982,0.00015044103,0.000028863966,0.00040353727,0.000031892432,0.00046925954,0.00018802502,0.00014167781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000034014913,0.0001518605,0.00007557519,0.000004434412,0.0001315028,0.00004281189,0.00015652768,0.0002279781,0.000003313119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041190415,0.0000013239284,0.0000019145632,0.000007550214,0.000022552598,0.000011741152,0.00014991133,0.000002146504,4.5804845e-7,0.978611,0.019900056,0.0012872199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008480064,0.000004357774,0.000004429518,0.000018626377,0.000038366245,1.9084374e-7,0.00009696536,0.000003793696,0.000002015449,0.0005094297,0.99905527,0.00018175172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7378578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84752065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97915524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023997065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61926913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231164726","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2008.20056","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Nursing; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3816856800491292,"score_gpt":0.363145421978042,"score_spread":0.018540258071087168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231164726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42021453,0.0006668804,0.00082226656,0.07737128,0.00031590147,0.00031379928,0.0000034325797,0.00024222987,0.50004965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941218,0.000029496861,0.00045975833,0.00037180202,0.00018769247,0.000005167406,0.0000011402003,0.000004925193,0.0048182216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994548,0.00003838526,0.00005598796,0.000111496985,0.00014601165,0.00019330476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997708,0.00002974654,0.000018932575,0.000074728974,0.00001775413,0.00008802492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001300153,0.000041125393,0.000049442697,0.00002094691,0.00064655056,0.00002473565,0.00007431515,0.00004413736,0.000037804595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003199588,0.000041987438,0.000017957169,0.00010034999,0.00045776917,0.00008618124,0.000004238981,0.00007015899,0.000053702533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021135975,0.0003205216,0.015667442,0.000023417575,0.000022199452,0.0000124184335,0.28181207,0.000005186217,0.00053797395,0.564273,0.030282969,0.10702165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008216688,0.00007832442,0.10506337,0.00016495008,0.00003536672,0.000029367926,0.08518758,0.00009507539,0.00045781693,0.018701589,0.78884673,0.00051818206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022694936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003617338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75856376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059303755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062812745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49728096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231214153","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_323","title":"The Charles Wallace Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Optometrists; Camargo Foundation; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Royal Academy of Engineering; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government","keywords":"History; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02869731504642411,"score_gpt":0.28123639886206797,"score_spread":0.2525390838156439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231214153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007522713,0.00086945447,0.000018928939,0.0014908814,0.00037097983,0.00065279595,0.000088854504,0.00013614459,0.9962967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6716676,0.0007458533,0.000046026707,0.0001981828,0.00164165,0.000049760198,0.000013631972,0.0000520336,0.32558528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809194,0.000049858812,0.00034338605,0.0004381126,0.00056091597,0.00051580265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983556,0.00022477229,0.00026935124,0.0007346447,0.00019276646,0.00022286712],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005666955,0.0003210691,0.00027483056,0.000053488857,0.0019479335,0.0002761189,0.0009337154,0.0003518021,0.0014323685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005291171,0.00023609426,0.00024739906,0.000020088493,0.0009394911,5.7034396e-7,0.00020640438,0.00032144156,0.0016604332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004613781,1.2364167e-7,0.000011043798,0.0000051741827,0.000044697354,0.0000030057624,0.0019620652,3.546853e-8,0.000007811896,0.9870998,0.00056645554,0.010295143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049551607,0.000012214882,0.00002064142,0.000019888235,0.000024130431,8.520159e-7,0.00017360333,0.0000017840877,0.000011424453,0.50865924,0.49084583,0.00018084876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078030425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080557875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67159235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019389817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027243295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231438252","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah13029","title":"<i>Bona fides</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fides; Meaning (existential); Term (time); Property (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02167179769491176,"score_gpt":0.2624927503718462,"score_spread":0.24082095267693446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231438252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022441063,0.026281668,0.00002590079,0.00045565944,0.0017146794,0.0003162542,0.000030921645,0.00010262275,0.97104985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008907143,0.002888876,0.00016551414,0.00046367638,0.0017040068,0.000037660673,0.000008520561,0.00010005527,0.993741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887335,0.00008746231,0.00017498522,0.00016816676,0.00040080852,0.0002952161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990485,0.00007280131,0.00028445947,0.00044983588,0.000031994692,0.00011241332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004994783,0.00012868714,0.00018192582,0.000069965026,0.0001473196,0.000003872909,0.0005917684,0.00015772927,0.0073492927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051659274,0.00009814667,0.000108921326,0.00011564036,0.00065631047,0.0000388258,0.000068941496,0.00018067051,0.0006046374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.660806e-7,0.000040855164,0.00003748133,0.000013843037,0.000007856853,1.9513261e-7,0.0036207445,1.9180095e-7,0.000008438206,0.054155625,0.94092387,0.0011901112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042991764,0.0000048005627,0.00012694458,0.000022793683,0.000033859007,1.4144584e-7,0.00019819442,1.8423685e-7,9.016768e-7,0.00008931938,0.9993569,0.00012296047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045664413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016013618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05843302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003121178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044849902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231809392","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-7121.2004.tb01869.x","title":"Cabinet secrecy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Political science; Secrecy; Statute; Convention; Cabinet (room); Engineering","score_opus":0.033473007880166834,"score_gpt":0.30596614128432104,"score_spread":0.2724931334041542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231809392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10341389,0.000031668646,0.0018803454,0.45321158,0.0002380777,0.00039185557,0.00006930487,0.00012258503,0.44064072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962402,0.000006773045,0.0002610661,0.0008484054,0.00028640803,0.000029043007,0.00007290409,0.0000055183364,0.0022496837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999327,0.000022134149,0.00010205946,0.00012980186,0.0001351868,0.00028381235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991199,0.00001053987,0.000030596326,0.00012958157,0.0000808575,0.0006285265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001911528,0.00005047235,0.00004398264,0.0000696308,0.0006808949,0.00022238398,0.00015950434,0.00007505321,0.00042851694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012249811,0.00005766457,0.000023903074,0.000283606,0.00009560974,0.0002831309,0.0000045008496,0.00007070174,0.00018716641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.8291603e-7,0.000008671554,0.00025015924,6.766421e-7,0.0000017368116,0.0000027220608,0.00027458492,7.0234756e-7,0.000008456304,0.99697787,0.0010154378,0.0014586927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008577107,0.000014763755,0.0010047308,0.0000016375645,0.0000020957525,0.0000017241038,0.00063967437,0.000003912509,0.000028184864,0.01293771,0.9852014,0.00007837176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0843296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9628032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046519758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00656952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231976445","doi":"10.1017/9781316827437.038","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231976445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024993552,0.00009216014,0.0007617439,0.000121078076,0.0010742764,0.00052258326,0.00039964163,0.000068098954,0.9967105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016823798,0.00023037005,0.000019908555,0.000102615806,0.0004816992,0.0000017692024,0.0000725004,0.000019033556,0.9822483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874145,0.00013752861,0.00010559282,0.00037223706,0.00029489337,0.00034828298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.00006893886,0.00014846036,0.0004343169,0.00013297697,0.0001737184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012737447,0.0001739766,0.00023954261,0.00008710378,0.0005774884,0.00010308849,0.00082794135,0.0004025431,0.00008085685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010849748,0.0002112687,0.00014829778,0.000040509865,0.0002851073,0.000091724985,0.00028449946,0.00041884778,0.0024215307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007589759,0.000008544991,0.000003831911,0.000021782593,0.000023286479,0.0000038784656,0.00018192975,0.000008983049,0.000005154923,0.3882697,0.6112349,0.00023041076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955167,0.0000070813667,0.000024606443,0.00003144459,0.000031978958,2.8661168e-7,0.00047870295,0.000018955674,0.000027432096,4.5485612e-7,0.998931,0.00025256057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012339986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053883246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38826922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028266988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005811423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232265458","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_391","title":"Stewardship, Concept of","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Political science","score_opus":0.03474829711382935,"score_gpt":0.3039051032337066,"score_spread":0.26915680611987725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232265458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000048116867,0.00006962956,0.0005810601,0.0009091368,0.00006848796,0.0001446249,0.000021506683,0.000037413,0.99816334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056620114,0.000044852673,0.00018525266,0.00013583737,0.00029318564,0.0000028636987,0.0000070848732,0.000009882574,0.9427009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939877,0.00001019885,0.00015178573,0.00012123919,0.00022512565,0.00009288576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994876,0.000067029396,0.00011722438,0.00018366067,0.00008241463,0.00006210322],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015673309,0.000071935865,0.00015496272,0.000020784768,0.00010347988,0.000014343364,0.00021903984,0.00016498151,0.004931308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016750875,0.000064019994,0.00008796215,0.000011808124,0.00029830847,0.000016625616,0.000037287664,0.00009491205,0.0002616388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.320339e-7,0.0000018242683,0.0000012290042,0.000003334745,0.000006836488,7.831035e-8,0.00045601474,4.1508954e-7,0.0000013845732,0.9869815,0.0072504557,0.0052965954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030362628,0.000008072807,0.00000315564,0.0000131905945,0.000011067756,3.7912038e-8,0.0000765806,9.195241e-7,0.000022560103,0.048793774,0.9509637,0.00007660425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008609894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086273276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94371325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025589055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012302789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232856949","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1002941","title":"Delegated Contracting","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.014181106994697268,"score_gpt":0.3224334410791927,"score_spread":0.3082523340844954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232856949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67539364,0.001275698,0.08021662,0.012420449,0.00038082976,0.00027622312,0.0000012485156,0.00016506853,0.22987026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932958,0.0007355828,0.00011043808,0.00013249846,0.0006772855,0.000001071116,5.607131e-7,0.0000071984355,0.005039574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976201,0.000044130466,0.0001725855,0.00008387468,0.00021960099,0.001859717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953264,0.000097092714,0.00010436267,0.000062189414,0.00009268397,0.000111043046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047671287,0.00005211074,0.00006399587,0.000041476338,0.0009486463,0.00007767822,0.00019896883,0.00005443062,0.000048206686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015521464,0.000041676314,0.000053540098,0.00020632565,0.00005804603,0.0001859338,0.000011106304,0.00077670097,0.00005545257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075490398,0.000020293266,0.0008936771,2.3726119e-7,0.000018550174,0.0000016052578,0.0006699984,0.0000029674952,0.00032325726,0.95122224,0.000043116477,0.04679649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042413152,0.00005370214,0.0015688494,0.0000067312917,0.000020882288,0.00008484628,0.02738635,0.000020308229,0.00020843312,0.3210386,0.64900535,0.00018178982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013571566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026056634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64896226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072855584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001682359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233245300","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt21pxjkw.9","title":"Prizemaking and the Vice-Admiralty Court at Halifax","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Liverpool University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science","score_opus":0.04186810190236449,"score_gpt":0.25757882428115075,"score_spread":0.21571072237878627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233245300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011075166,0.00013873754,0.00003511952,0.0006567504,0.00009903798,0.0006979225,0.00013405918,0.00007948369,0.9980481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01582755,0.000639151,0.00006550392,0.000111917194,0.00021356498,0.0000018992611,0.000008364223,0.000017919316,0.9831141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988675,0.000080386766,0.00011634551,0.00035856816,0.00033466262,0.00024254496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986693,0.00018959737,0.00034511992,0.0005516857,0.00009468027,0.00014960267],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030364134,0.00020156169,0.00027460343,0.000037917685,0.0032766631,0.00017780064,0.00082980667,0.00029872725,0.00009058522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019645731,0.00017798896,0.00015268363,0.0000030424806,0.0017541489,0.00011269108,0.00080920255,0.00035623007,0.000030632415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006750687,0.000003013523,0.000008019205,0.000016406508,0.000069330374,0.000020611385,0.0036151998,4.007675e-7,0.0000015993501,0.9929634,0.0021684638,0.0010660486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055399927,0.000007433425,0.00003770154,0.00008445386,0.00018264508,0.0000019429485,0.00018854099,0.000019606226,0.000003150817,0.00382759,0.99487025,0.00022269017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008475202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040982715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99270177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021007932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014709277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233389050","doi":"10.1089/glre.2011.16314","title":"<i>Lake Louise Limited Partnership v. Canad Corp. of Manitoba Ltd.</i> <i>[2011] M.J. No. 305; 2011 MBQB 225, 2011 MB.C. LEXIS 845 (Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Winnipeg Centre, September 16, 2011)</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Lexis; General partnership; Art; Humanities; Political science; Library science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0326076102925209,"score_gpt":0.2605759400749266,"score_spread":0.22796832978240572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233389050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28242505,0.12966849,0.000097428456,0.0076315845,0.0024036835,0.0041919993,0.001663701,0.00025913442,0.57165897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9031119,0.08051498,0.00073957694,0.0044828346,0.0013327654,0.00011156084,0.0002811176,0.00012734337,0.00929795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976413,0.00015601379,0.00090052595,0.00041674357,0.00015637271,0.00072899763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778044,0.00017638436,0.00073800643,0.0005867709,0.00024676256,0.00047160796],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010492109,0.0003266654,0.00080598675,0.000047587328,0.00042056377,0.00006267474,0.00045520446,0.00017998292,0.0017030234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003357729,0.0003283547,0.0002262461,0.00007582827,0.0006148298,0.00054104096,0.00012916996,0.00022354655,0.0008581507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029919134,0.0005300549,0.1676706,0.0025477884,0.00032688695,0.0000024434203,0.0019151522,0.0000129830305,0.000038989878,0.36631662,0.45370498,0.0069035767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026548593,0.000023954533,0.0025609569,0.00021531303,0.00026877064,0.0000021220483,0.0004530007,0.0000077124205,0.000112632835,0.000422563,0.9952837,0.00038378983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06899349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16932201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6206868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012507569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026049034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233693554","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u166009","title":"Kershaw, His Honour Philip Charles Stones, (9 April 1910–1 July 1986), a Circuit Judge (formerly Deputy Chairman, Lancashire Quarter Sessions), 1961–83, retired","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Art; History; Management; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04705074056876273,"score_gpt":0.3112875950530346,"score_spread":0.26423685448427187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233693554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008046025,0.009554851,0.00034454535,0.007312967,0.0024878816,0.0027039673,0.0021950502,0.0007936725,0.966561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16640797,0.08112469,0.00025826358,0.002578287,0.012736937,0.0008513555,0.0022555238,0.00036416037,0.7334228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344164,0.00036023892,0.0011387081,0.0015055015,0.0017562747,0.0017976619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961203,0.00033038465,0.0008759863,0.0013914186,0.000410845,0.00087109173],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010860267,0.00093395694,0.0013252692,0.00043296788,0.0022216416,0.00049399806,0.0017988201,0.0016719607,0.0012068443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019671847,0.0008738972,0.0006396064,0.0010398345,0.0006801153,0.000546432,0.0002895897,0.0018189054,0.0021954102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048308506,0.0003278755,0.0014354879,0.00047755573,0.00021057898,0.00006377854,0.015372213,0.000001479325,0.000011744029,0.018059378,0.858796,0.105195604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059063145,0.00006717048,0.0053836904,0.00097464205,0.0001699175,0.0000125996485,0.0026261357,0.00002419315,0.000013794449,0.0009807046,0.98803264,0.0011238833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006174946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008480105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23313823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009005175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001852975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233698800","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v20i1.74","title":"CIVIL LITIGATION NEGLIGENCE AND THE MALAYSIAN ADVOCATE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Sanctions; Duty; Common law; Political science; Liability; Duty of care; Presentation (obstetrics); Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.018738665033643548,"score_gpt":0.29930311454728165,"score_spread":0.2805644495136381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233698800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18977456,0.0019679042,0.00252776,0.073419295,0.0007461777,0.00031431598,0.0000042661845,0.00004806881,0.73119766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748516,0.0002749852,0.00016257938,0.0005032362,0.0011171338,0.000006467752,3.13728e-7,0.0000033278088,0.00044677148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934447,0.000119534794,0.00010883112,0.000046908965,0.00017274795,0.00020750621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959266,0.0000695609,0.000072609284,0.00007022792,0.000045507928,0.00014942083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010214528,0.000039254646,0.00005113299,0.000009070311,0.0015442059,0.00017592775,0.00013611489,0.000028902474,0.00012192939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040326704,0.00002526275,0.000032712196,0.00008402664,0.00038116568,0.00036000583,0.000025374493,0.00015142674,0.000038421524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032749454,0.00000891565,0.0009561933,8.137859e-7,0.0000038143905,2.0196056e-7,0.0060947477,0.0000030578858,0.000035989164,0.9902213,0.00023454874,0.0024371473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003395845,0.000007507125,0.008464645,0.000014582464,0.000022514432,0.00003213129,0.0043543694,0.00006702574,0.00012734543,0.0544728,0.93200076,0.00009671368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014955112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020388388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025528609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035018656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233815719","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107360624.020","title":"NEWFOUNDLAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03083185535629933,"score_gpt":0.2394905252316804,"score_spread":0.20865866987538106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233815719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023123981,0.000038363432,0.00074109173,0.00013590921,0.00014560706,0.00028990523,0.00008987515,0.00014204194,0.9983941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024738675,0.00010418167,0.00005211181,0.00011450447,0.00045978205,5.61616e-7,0.000021963264,0.000021987411,0.996751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990692,0.000036059006,0.000101562466,0.0003066763,0.00025571897,0.00023076704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991244,0.00006826264,0.00013425414,0.00035763215,0.00011363791,0.00020180525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013698911,0.00016886204,0.0002054475,0.00006361865,0.00065022346,0.000076125354,0.000511631,0.00029528898,0.000020166728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009751196,0.00020417967,0.00014502487,0.000005886149,0.00039706792,0.00004393328,0.00017483214,0.00027835954,0.00009572917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006557827,0.0000021876906,0.000002464465,0.000009589622,0.000025294908,0.00001194734,0.000112075606,4.87837e-7,0.0000021223702,0.956757,0.041816924,0.001253323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015486215,0.000009282815,0.0000105387235,0.000029767667,0.00007459711,7.030288e-7,0.00003855269,0.00000600414,0.0000023463335,0.00007180829,0.99936336,0.00023819595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046754447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042816502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9575464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002304779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83262056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233971077","doi":"10.35940/ijrte.b2846.078219","title":"Doctrine of Pleasure in major Common law Countries: Interpretation &amp; Correlation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Doctrine; Law; Common law; Constitution; Political science; Power (physics); Psychology","score_opus":0.007795037656164979,"score_gpt":0.2770343065031287,"score_spread":0.26923926884696375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233971077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844505,0.00034519276,0.006611102,0.0056371796,0.0006136801,0.00011880367,0.000005741256,0.000028311555,0.0021894998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984933,0.0007122828,0.000624964,0.00003882752,0.000049062368,0.000002309564,0.0000035008266,0.0000044459834,0.000071290735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992938,0.00001570623,0.0003126873,0.00006837174,0.00021970349,0.00008973581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938786,0.000082034014,0.00019138069,0.000061645296,0.0002512531,0.000025841562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035400703,0.00005694663,0.00013495891,0.00034075545,0.000027557486,0.00001958735,0.00022676606,0.000114805014,0.00006519846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009186277,0.00005580107,0.00002833833,0.00022365255,0.00007234459,0.00018898673,0.000031621814,0.00023426895,0.000007661583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012093828,0.0000810648,0.08471326,0.000023909408,0.000099125835,0.000005498155,0.002253496,0.007760783,0.0027426973,0.89257723,0.00006370547,0.009558317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003076159,0.0002020719,0.025638442,0.00077588414,0.000056168636,0.00011228162,0.0025348377,0.008690142,0.0023176805,0.020435307,0.9357649,0.0003960874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011006745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029449124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93570125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010389005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004041152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22755015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233971825","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.61","title":"THE VERY IDEA OF A JUDGE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Skepticism; Order (exchange); Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.009444938411722052,"score_gpt":0.2465539911978685,"score_spread":0.23710905278614644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233971825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21152297,0.00017389217,0.00018444749,0.002795934,0.00027632096,0.00006609685,0.000007597962,0.000008579179,0.78496414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772024,0.00025018436,0.00044673932,0.000013466944,0.00008898875,1.4246517e-8,1.2714011e-7,0.0000011420093,0.001479107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996344,0.000032808006,0.000060337687,0.000034936747,0.00015060982,0.00008691282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995706,0.000062260275,0.00010540744,0.000086408574,0.000110900626,0.000064435546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003580421,0.00002291503,0.000049553128,0.0000032840999,0.0011852741,0.000018290575,0.00033034149,0.000032472897,0.00044951565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002122287,0.00001920187,0.00006292556,0.00001677567,0.0003853793,0.0001984115,0.000035836205,0.0001071402,0.0000035759122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011288102,0.000022048363,0.0003505399,9.4839874e-7,0.0000130570625,0.0000010262936,0.0038574664,0.0000012762497,0.0010383333,0.9897415,0.0015070146,0.0034555234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118736665,0.000012198215,0.0033872607,0.0000030695837,0.000010624975,0.0000013877842,0.008141988,0.0000058723213,0.000070401315,0.0017403874,0.986481,0.000027042635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.120543376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5908464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9880011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045866167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000873832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91162896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234672108","doi":"10.1016/s0887-7963(03)90000-9","title":"The application of the precautionary principle to the blood system: The Canadian Blood System's vCJD donor deferral policy*1","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Deferral; Economic shortage; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Dilemma; Public economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Finance","score_opus":0.033397157514249605,"score_gpt":0.32953314973930087,"score_spread":0.29613599222505127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234672108","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078640625,0.051738355,0.0038707922,0.49152547,0.0018114742,0.034851037,0.00013128508,0.00025129045,0.33717966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98125565,0.013823821,0.00006061713,0.0009973792,0.0007704998,0.0012986053,0.000004866922,0.000018346374,0.0017702299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678713,0.0012065335,0.0007055806,0.0002765312,0.00062520994,0.0003990422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980093,0.00027280897,0.0002547484,0.0010576444,0.00016133006,0.00024412893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004893469,0.0001751352,0.00031173776,0.000047912534,0.0039097113,0.000047231748,0.0011899822,0.000091872156,0.00002830157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004415684,0.000065745204,0.0001800638,0.0012649143,0.0005394929,0.000047199617,0.000034471534,0.0002786139,0.00005339706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030814267,0.000028199003,0.00068787107,0.00014827418,0.000025509575,2.245192e-7,0.005270512,0.000023057757,0.00023429233,0.9880574,0.0014267619,0.004094826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020060052,0.000027694814,0.0016397526,0.00030127974,0.00024522873,0.000015444524,0.0030123987,0.00003403844,0.00006495138,0.0001535996,0.99421877,0.0000862341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37813362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72040296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022246048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008645543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99738705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234864137","doi":"10.3138/9781442606401-002","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03278393828229341,"score_gpt":0.25565243397280696,"score_spread":0.22286849569051354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234864137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002875654,0.00027726023,0.0002605818,0.000024191688,0.0001365395,0.00022180485,0.00003628236,0.000044032582,0.99899644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00043179607,0.00033238216,0.00020931472,0.0000137946045,0.00019156552,1.7911671e-7,0.0000062808303,0.000009946277,0.99880475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936986,0.000021423595,0.000084232815,0.00018281862,0.00021373847,0.0001279095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992435,0.00002899845,0.00015579145,0.00025732108,0.0002188641,0.000095523574],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001107354,0.000101674625,0.00017130654,0.000008159393,0.00029513577,0.000013814051,0.00048204794,0.00018750723,0.0044431635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000912624,0.000129086,0.0001144508,3.554961e-7,0.0002897413,0.000045482924,0.00017481446,0.00008253012,0.00017707727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007249227,0.0000057289667,0.0000011630086,0.000018337943,0.000047445505,9.5106134e-7,0.005435439,3.7960103e-7,0.0000033913154,0.94349694,0.037558146,0.013424844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012328387,0.000011960016,0.000007659158,0.00003927512,0.000062034,2.4386843e-8,0.00006990899,0.0000031581105,0.0000052400615,0.0012340242,0.99831796,0.00012546747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058577538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14478849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019844747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008998988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99646693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234970766","doi":"10.1016/s1041-7060(05)11015-3","title":"List of Contributors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in public interest accounting","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Stakeholder; Accounting; Corporate communication; Public relations; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.03730792600936155,"score_gpt":0.32971338181483356,"score_spread":0.292405455805472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234970766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062725914,0.0021879543,0.00007301529,0.0023277847,0.00040545457,0.0002767284,0.000051225958,0.000059217913,0.9939914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8611776,0.0020122193,0.00023826766,0.00017524653,0.0011204707,0.000022159207,0.000031177664,0.000035617413,0.13518722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835104,0.000022935652,0.0005944587,0.00031905618,0.00032610365,0.00038643656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985065,0.00024830436,0.0005967269,0.00027748905,0.0003013341,0.000069658825],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071018207,0.00019698047,0.00035270766,0.00022425102,0.00020569596,0.00014620328,0.0006988781,0.0002648317,0.0011254316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043683284,0.00020612187,0.00012731095,0.000119820324,0.00043648772,0.0010581437,0.00017350962,0.00045975836,0.00006539075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023913763,0.000015877727,0.0005519269,0.000019849083,0.000009240502,0.0000013259529,0.0002846781,0.0000017192154,0.000003427912,0.971011,0.00025288598,0.027845675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110396075,0.0000069639073,0.00002950705,0.00018593979,0.0000081139415,4.5007062e-7,0.00027935678,0.000009419004,0.000005537537,0.029059391,0.97010845,0.00019647824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029084217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023803983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96985555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027382863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023373804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235095265","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748697748.001.0001","title":"Trusts and Patrimonies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Appropriation; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Comparative law; Common law; Political science; Trust law; Public law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04031649753995196,"score_gpt":0.26182868723374786,"score_spread":0.2215121896937959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235095265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000107130574,0.00020836122,0.000019835523,0.00015505934,0.00020470684,0.00030745033,0.00008695983,0.00012138933,0.99878913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012018393,0.0002618823,0.00006789704,0.000027816095,0.0007004345,0.0000010867404,0.000014105511,0.000011521722,0.9977134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989975,0.000045711924,0.00009109741,0.00028903756,0.00034553348,0.0002311228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999167,0.00008180167,0.00011713625,0.00021884959,0.00015519271,0.0002600209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002458999,0.00015246471,0.00020422602,0.00007286492,0.00054811937,0.00008326548,0.00038155506,0.00032627818,0.000048132522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002328512,0.00017574374,0.00006770139,0.000014928777,0.0005250846,0.00010247606,0.00027627402,0.00028604225,0.000003589193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012071663,0.0000065404765,0.000006423434,0.000008416841,0.000030727017,0.000016646418,0.0050011324,5.831906e-7,7.833837e-7,0.51880246,0.47330183,0.0028124081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018973053,0.00001285353,0.0000037905045,0.000026377327,0.00007791174,4.851194e-7,0.0008577646,0.0000034849895,0.0000024375743,0.0041243285,0.9944997,0.00020117569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029715174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037709466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52119786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030235288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078982906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71666217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235363811","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v11i1.10724","title":"Galambos v Perez, its Critics, and the Equity-Certainty Paradox in Fiduciary Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Fiduciary; Equity (law); Post hoc; Supreme court; Law and economics; Certainty; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Duty; Medicine","score_opus":0.09636965377138822,"score_gpt":0.4299462558601999,"score_spread":0.3335766020888117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235363811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76983654,0.04067186,0.00004894263,0.1455082,0.0005940857,0.00027404111,0.000010609783,0.00001596396,0.04303972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935521,0.0038561577,0.000056635356,0.0011116704,0.00041793426,0.0000059380422,2.0206241e-7,0.0000052188475,0.0009941508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986942,0.000281399,0.00036069518,0.000111767404,0.00033303795,0.00021893047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988794,0.0004658201,0.00014058812,0.00009303757,0.00034897443,0.00007220822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013013992,0.00008513711,0.00028859614,0.000023402614,0.0005296909,0.0001814991,0.00021710046,0.00003533006,0.000015701633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050453853,0.00005609198,0.00008503963,0.0001340297,0.0005821507,0.0002906058,0.00021910263,0.00027691864,0.0000053552885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005357791,0.00010728619,0.01188717,0.000041017705,0.00014269752,0.0001525301,0.034203112,0.00002679846,0.000060111448,0.95093954,0.00069844205,0.0016877203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043662363,0.00013544034,0.038803272,0.0005063215,0.00023531445,0.00021097482,0.119710535,0.000031884796,0.00044141174,0.05805868,0.7770185,0.00048142133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007036647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012017247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89288086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007414815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015139864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6705906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235642073","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-56632-7_12","title":"Structured Settlements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Personal injury; Settlement (finance); Meaning (existential); Compensation (psychology); Payment; Human settlement; Forensic engineering; Business; Actuarial science; Psychology; Law; History; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering; Archaeology; Finance; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.023923909133375453,"score_gpt":0.27946559414835853,"score_spread":0.2555416850149831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235642073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000074266485,0.00020243351,0.000062826315,0.00018481756,0.000274477,0.00066384574,0.0004135299,0.000143319,0.9979805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86222345,0.000034945067,0.00021747242,0.00020629841,0.00091059675,0.000029304427,0.00016530848,0.000056384313,0.13615625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980901,0.000022620774,0.00037221346,0.00046262497,0.00060280575,0.00044962394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988723,0.000053042655,0.0002593767,0.0005053852,0.00011528638,0.00019464306],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019494547,0.00033941193,0.00032404016,0.00010685337,0.0005929679,0.00014138315,0.0005152472,0.00039056293,0.0015872259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012450095,0.0003365695,0.00022302962,0.000019071433,0.0003380552,6.361845e-7,0.00013347235,0.00030502016,0.00037663375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029557284,1.4794122e-7,0.000040664745,0.000009221661,0.000041012863,0.000007893473,0.0003915749,9.1838365e-7,0.00002297772,0.9928983,0.0007100152,0.0058743153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011634152,0.000008693554,0.00012471067,0.00002129733,0.00004070064,7.6701997e-7,0.000040614126,0.0000013141201,0.000020114594,0.66761065,0.33173275,0.00028208492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001610482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005221521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8621492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019505231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022256919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235794566","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u235053","title":"Briant, His Honour Judge Bruce Edgar Dutton, (31 July 1895–15 Aug. 1959), QC 1953; Judge of County Courts, Circuit No. 50 (Sussex), since 1954; Deputy-Chairman West Sussex Quarter Sessions since 1953","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; History; West Yorkshire; Management; Operations research; Political science; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.027522549846202334,"score_gpt":0.29788891201040385,"score_spread":0.2703663621642015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235794566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0086064,0.010131272,0.0013904822,0.008414224,0.0055888277,0.0036980424,0.0078077377,0.0008155446,0.9535475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36268783,0.07890328,0.0009976412,0.00397204,0.014932546,0.0005508303,0.0034106537,0.000674695,0.53387046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901205,0.0005321737,0.0021934821,0.0021533144,0.0026039395,0.0023966278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225074,0.00094727485,0.0018574761,0.0022398438,0.0014621264,0.0012425297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017159398,0.0013896689,0.0021790185,0.00056810037,0.002506405,0.00065646303,0.0029814888,0.0024305168,0.00063679024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044241644,0.0013873508,0.00081654213,0.001403806,0.0015973608,0.000797511,0.000584951,0.002960809,0.0017214811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007158855,0.0008646015,0.0011823482,0.0008281874,0.0002719257,0.00008189838,0.0042820913,0.00001784845,0.0001019311,0.04520432,0.9398927,0.0072005503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008523393,0.00014399338,0.005922644,0.0015748434,0.00032248267,0.000019117282,0.0009779718,0.000060384114,0.000066996436,0.00086476107,0.9875786,0.0016158917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01938393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0191723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.419677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013489086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047524734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235797826","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-95988-4_236","title":"Canon Collins Trust","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts; Camargo Foundation; Government of Canada; Canadian Blood Services; Canada Council for the Arts; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Canon; Art; Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.036758557685698745,"score_gpt":0.27928948717668856,"score_spread":0.2425309294909898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235797826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019984494,0.00033641083,0.00006886923,0.0012018209,0.0002490103,0.00076353294,0.0003550723,0.00019442437,0.99681085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88367546,0.00017168456,0.000146961,0.00064780144,0.0012464355,0.000046850055,0.00005820685,0.00006905887,0.11393752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809825,0.000035638353,0.00037187804,0.0005412006,0.000549237,0.0004037904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868155,0.00008816168,0.00023925335,0.00044960773,0.00012149336,0.00041994557],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018821837,0.000348229,0.00041812123,0.000081166545,0.0006482759,0.00013119372,0.0006010019,0.00041432888,0.0013265209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038017224,0.00035684442,0.00027133632,0.000032411084,0.00040397095,5.035466e-7,0.00015656036,0.0004162847,0.0010311714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004969022,1.8503353e-7,0.00002912968,0.0000145698,0.000046251716,0.000020428573,0.0013690554,5.2734646e-7,0.000024160738,0.99342614,0.00023498271,0.0048295977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009909932,0.000019576606,0.000025084151,0.000025176361,0.000046662797,9.15396e-7,0.00008762788,0.000005142931,0.000019162406,0.53827995,0.46110502,0.0002865743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013432002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056452183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8836555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019925929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005741689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235865919","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009807","title":"Rosanna L. Langer Defining Rights and Wrongs: Bureaucracy, Human Rights, and Public Accountability. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2007, 191 p.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Research Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Accountability; Political science; Human rights; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01886601769549185,"score_gpt":0.2806696273508276,"score_spread":0.2618036096553358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235865919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9213876,0.0035636025,0.00002216666,0.0056619016,0.00040348026,0.00032942172,0.00015939063,0.000026444826,0.06844595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955568,0.00020656116,0.0003015371,0.0018159271,0.00045709487,0.0000059387453,0.000012909768,0.000014127541,0.0016291543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829507,0.0000970638,0.0004100237,0.00031188055,0.00014829646,0.00073766586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742365,0.00013240441,0.00026356388,0.00019521172,0.0002750782,0.001710077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000913994,0.0002026455,0.00038194103,0.0000485398,0.002400564,0.00044929198,0.00027924136,0.00024325754,0.00009101151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055691387,0.0001997208,0.00015398413,0.00013886375,0.0007773585,0.0007447436,0.000023378196,0.0004895303,9.10339e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024635485,0.0000221493,0.00084610115,0.000025582965,0.00006564115,0.000028403401,0.028621351,0.0000019288466,0.000010396385,0.94385296,0.025515141,0.0010079079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005078256,0.0000798221,0.0019668178,0.000065311186,0.00007450529,0.000044247943,0.0077523403,0.000021800295,0.000003253897,0.09384004,0.8953353,0.00030869842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5974974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.969448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8698202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005107625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005730987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236391300","doi":"10.7202/1021950ar","title":"Areas of Proof in a Discharge Case","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Dismissal; Punishment (psychology); Law; Management; Political science; Law and economics; Engineering; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031918708454933845,"score_gpt":0.30292678564381326,"score_spread":0.2710080771888794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236391300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7911107,0.00005370105,0.0013225831,0.005266607,0.000038768118,0.0003208798,0.0000133006615,0.00002691623,0.20184655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964964,0.0000066697853,0.00018431341,0.000013212022,0.00006346916,0.000024733403,0.0000037712011,0.0000037416057,0.0032037322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944067,0.000079565594,0.00016951702,0.00009202658,0.00010417332,0.000114047754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.00015903161,0.00006440734,0.00012837726,0.00003895803,0.00004830976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003425348,0.000039978462,0.000070154005,0.000065887514,0.00022466363,0.000013508375,0.000083790386,0.000106495114,0.00014528986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031994376,0.000038462087,0.000024458051,0.00043378212,0.00011137031,0.00009450793,0.000020339638,0.00014553695,0.00002341929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014752853,0.00009722708,0.04815565,0.0000010073544,0.000004356555,0.0000032601083,0.0055766487,0.00029176782,0.000016525591,0.93427444,0.0009597506,0.010617899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048591697,0.000028599186,0.011321106,0.0000545507,0.000021449063,0.000013803536,0.011467887,0.0018685721,0.00039402267,0.012874135,0.9612535,0.00021642959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021702931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030278175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96029377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033256623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012321073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32808486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236494896","doi":"10.4324/9781003048718","title":"The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Politics","score_opus":0.026927517995938458,"score_gpt":0.2939330178789376,"score_spread":0.26700549988299915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236494896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.0233166e-7,0.00017570879,0.00033919353,0.009161521,0.000053957872,0.0002151022,0.000038370967,0.00003706673,0.98997855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058840658,0.00008623447,0.00009127206,0.0007085634,0.00042775532,0.000020874586,0.000012715916,0.0000028635889,0.99276567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995114,0.000024215055,0.00007545702,0.00012613123,0.00017117872,0.00009159583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999558,0.00021863684,0.00004021516,0.00006189233,0.000045067623,0.000076217206],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011071324,0.000058809856,0.00006414211,0.000002939038,0.0012702781,0.000126172,0.00014268608,0.00008048121,0.00021336484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029704188,0.000038738046,0.0000297424,0.000017039572,0.005661728,0.000026861018,0.000065157226,0.0001466838,0.00013245369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.065589e-7,0.000001406921,0.0000011947247,0.0000011937025,0.000009963402,2.7983154e-7,0.00039569015,5.701347e-7,4.782934e-8,0.9243951,0.074932136,0.00026171352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026627707,0.0000036220797,0.0000028732074,0.000004128658,0.000008142702,7.013117e-8,0.00017150168,0.000011260265,4.7830684e-7,0.10126853,0.8984542,0.00004856972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027366125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018723243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82352203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054243872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006539219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99704427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236792495","doi":"10.4324/9781315094113-18","title":"Moral agent or actuarial subject:","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Actuarial science; Psychology; Epistemology; Business; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.12197209649168429,"score_gpt":0.3554947679513722,"score_spread":0.2335226714596879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236792495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008363578,0.000023108842,0.00004088169,0.002514418,0.00045879916,0.0003281617,0.000035390505,0.0000890965,0.9965018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012936853,0.000216807,0.0001837867,0.00018968633,0.0020139993,0.000014174401,0.000016905895,0.000020097956,0.98440766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990714,0.000008810014,0.00015011206,0.0002464387,0.00031459593,0.00020861122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999176,0.00004708447,0.00015089198,0.0004260971,0.000060136746,0.00013974289],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019196782,0.000142283,0.0001834051,0.000028717626,0.0009409165,0.00023850244,0.00054089597,0.00028343112,0.010633948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048735124,0.00010693434,0.00013018104,0.0000061888395,0.00026769808,0.00009205591,0.000110507535,0.00019606709,0.0016113482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074776635,0.0000058316327,0.0000032286457,0.0000022599706,0.000015006368,0.0000054318425,0.00040047194,1.01865886e-7,8.300776e-7,0.97103,0.022551507,0.005977867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082714825,0.000012493047,0.000020342846,0.0000116435485,0.000023822853,3.548484e-7,0.00003988266,0.0000012675943,0.0000026794132,0.057802886,0.9418387,0.00016320763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004385555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030790461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009726762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049275457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236850607","doi":"10.1017/9781108526081.018","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Alberta; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236850607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033347285,0.00006329861,0.00078562077,0.0001112015,0.0008104081,0.0003757862,0.00036771156,0.00008237588,0.99707013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008933154,0.00019274896,0.000039696635,0.000098872704,0.0011568725,0.000002104379,0.00005973012,0.000018485376,0.9894983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00014494616,0.00010834862,0.00037414295,0.00028695448,0.000360626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.000051242267,0.00014685592,0.00040633522,0.00019834762,0.00021557152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857286,0.00017359815,0.00021110065,0.0000863407,0.00095847005,0.00011146012,0.0008660532,0.00039935156,0.0001276099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152395705,0.00020973122,0.0001317593,0.000045465393,0.00064752385,0.000087858054,0.0003040098,0.00033021744,0.0016100289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272979,0.000008916045,0.000001841033,0.0000125013985,0.000022840626,0.0000047836447,0.00024107621,7.516388e-7,0.0000039424745,0.29569677,0.70378184,0.00021645456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015847865,0.00001000528,0.000018129129,0.000029625562,0.000038599803,3.7792682e-7,0.00041646563,0.000010707584,0.000051044135,9.660291e-7,0.9990204,0.00024522492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011503459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29569578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026606026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050177996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237684392","doi":"10.1007/s40264-020-01019-x","title":"Acknowledgement to Referees","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Drug Safety","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Medicine; Acknowledgement; Family medicine","score_opus":0.0440305095228658,"score_gpt":0.3307043194318489,"score_spread":0.2866738099089831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237684392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014097926,0.000034477493,0.0014217934,0.23319532,0.000120534394,0.0003281149,0.000020502093,0.00014263144,0.75063866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989357,0.000029345021,0.0007301468,0.0035980311,0.0004750689,0.000017739558,0.0000035636863,0.0000046640503,0.0057844264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948597,0.000034348563,0.00008696053,0.00012727297,0.00013321167,0.00013224511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996314,0.000027800417,0.000015238875,0.000090603666,0.00004611961,0.00018883802],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017071574,0.000036799054,0.000053357995,0.000007717125,0.00028860054,0.00002866083,0.00020204336,0.000015817732,0.0006965118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101804624,0.000035617486,0.000026404567,0.00020680884,0.000027520437,0.000046155088,0.000076641474,0.0000480601,0.0024295917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016322618,0.000038382845,0.00063440664,0.00000680415,0.00000933025,6.955938e-7,0.05985693,0.000058679125,0.00019433246,0.7667323,0.14710604,0.02534578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049209415,0.000004316196,0.0016213114,0.0000021182225,0.0000024139324,7.508784e-9,0.002074757,0.000017835506,0.00007932249,0.00035872858,0.9957374,0.0000525976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033920357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013632365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97525907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004353598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054036216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238048822","doi":"10.1017/9781108675321.015","title":"Index","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03534017225878285,"score_gpt":0.26558892029203235,"score_spread":0.2302487480332495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238048822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007698098,0.000083569576,0.0010063159,0.0004925644,0.0004944585,0.0003941931,0.00044715183,0.00009897948,0.9969058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012180517,0.0002634455,0.000035011988,0.00023189824,0.00073735364,0.0000020641578,0.00007705323,0.000018842973,0.98645383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987829,0.00014071225,0.00010744142,0.00037874165,0.0002848188,0.00030538556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913245,0.000052577452,0.00013384158,0.00028718336,0.000106624815,0.00028734287],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008084186,0.00017161931,0.00023389824,0.000057404573,0.000702739,0.00010545207,0.0008174936,0.00032704082,0.000063428866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001773028,0.00021369956,0.0001453367,0.0000517212,0.00032404784,0.00007745497,0.00031303288,0.00045968848,0.0011162052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008738844,0.00000638139,0.0000013700575,0.00001804786,0.000023335726,0.000011332687,0.0002947511,0.0000028031404,0.000006018434,0.367013,0.6323465,0.00026769933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016486332,0.00000774598,0.000012238045,0.000021075195,0.00004164312,2.7199468e-7,0.0005547803,0.000022288,0.000037632653,6.2646865e-7,0.99889785,0.00023899585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008660263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046103647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36701238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021755885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005179117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238243658","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3649826","title":"Knowledge Judgments in 'Gettier' Cases","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02628667410425053,"score_gpt":0.33432181828128926,"score_spread":0.30803514417703876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238243658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8541558,0.0042287554,0.0015786996,0.017372726,0.0003510599,0.0002712826,0.0000062248446,0.00006062655,0.12197483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820702,0.002509362,0.000017081229,0.00003938128,0.00033283848,0.000007752038,2.4880615e-7,0.000006627652,0.015016527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.00010411577,0.00015107795,0.000104873354,0.00017017112,0.0012913654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962527,0.00007355653,0.0000566942,0.00007780749,0.00006316441,0.0001035053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017677025,0.00005797164,0.000075754695,0.00006357311,0.00026706347,0.00003564444,0.00023468646,0.000044527427,0.00006737828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015408722,0.000040158542,0.00004093742,0.00019856595,0.000071630675,0.00020253158,0.000025529163,0.00038015618,0.00018124761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009201416,0.000083597406,0.0049786447,6.0044044e-7,0.000014277882,0.0000033476083,0.0011321125,8.6662914e-7,0.000103338134,0.9160896,0.0007959704,0.07678845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007088324,0.0000843176,0.0010332644,0.000025015963,0.000007848742,0.00004628978,0.0049923467,0.0000030499943,0.00003638618,0.4642148,0.5286994,0.00014847335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006910044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046785686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5279034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017050571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003372558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.970608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238574055","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198795827.003.0002","title":"2. The nature of the express trust","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Beneficiary; Settlor; Trust law; Express trust; Blind trust; Insolvency; Context (archaeology); Business; Law; Property (philosophy); Voting trust; Constructive trust; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.018131686952768622,"score_gpt":0.23259280623394082,"score_spread":0.2144611192811722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238574055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012967571,0.000098397584,0.00001055842,0.0003409118,0.000253689,0.0004922569,0.000114594535,0.000026337886,0.9985336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01175067,0.00032556235,0.000016863438,0.000045796234,0.0001074782,5.933617e-7,0.0000025061631,0.000012497777,0.987738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913526,0.000046060926,0.000102584825,0.0001904495,0.0003517649,0.00017388765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886197,0.0001403281,0.00023510613,0.0005936468,0.00011748189,0.000051493193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014938701,0.00012617766,0.00014315391,0.000019420528,0.0009949589,0.000047456055,0.001355953,0.00041400702,0.000025463152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012474691,0.00008569301,0.00020290825,0.000009941013,0.00061644113,0.000046064728,0.0004173527,0.00059150555,0.000001203228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011309271,0.0000026882467,0.000006882854,0.000009013725,0.00003107528,6.182857e-7,0.00063123973,0.0000021606024,0.00000583316,0.9953263,0.0027700723,0.0012028387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009357621,0.0000050582285,0.000022971957,0.000039401726,0.00005458866,1.5430398e-7,0.00032680857,0.0000036522567,0.000036020698,0.002230116,0.99708104,0.00010661993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034222426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046919036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008394932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025787883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76525205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239702562","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-4555-3.ch002","title":"Adverse Effects Discrimination","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in public policy and administration (APPA) book series","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Political science; Equity (law); Law; Face (sociological concept); Psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.024089807882359857,"score_gpt":0.32278390841070626,"score_spread":0.2986941005283464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239702562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046661353,0.002122838,0.00011486537,0.029152757,0.00015259402,0.00061656523,0.0000929242,0.0001250315,0.9675758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43040645,0.06217703,0.00049042417,0.0027445662,0.0021025299,0.00026345122,0.00035012572,0.00006863217,0.5013968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983513,0.000064940956,0.00041163416,0.00046766174,0.0003775397,0.00032694679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893963,0.00018748295,0.00029840527,0.00021274874,0.000087988585,0.00027374295],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022388053,0.00029270974,0.00031308303,0.00017998987,0.0005622213,0.0001931389,0.0002535001,0.00027435285,0.00011888846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003905964,0.00030940198,0.000084344305,0.00013967248,0.000741383,0.004309451,0.00008109305,0.00031544128,0.000040377494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001787328,0.000018610008,0.000019020275,0.00009972803,0.000010102992,0.000007900665,0.0010604418,9.190762e-7,0.0000063298357,0.98963386,0.00017957238,0.008945622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016655262,0.0001026421,0.00009930356,0.00008186613,0.000017487726,0.0000033163203,0.00039605395,0.000003319003,0.000032860127,0.110504135,0.8883048,0.00028765135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011205195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004205986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88812524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016811275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010625666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239922229","doi":"10.1017/9781316756041.010","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239922229","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033347285,0.00006329861,0.00078562077,0.0001112015,0.0008104081,0.0003757862,0.00036771156,0.00008237588,0.99707013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008933154,0.00019274896,0.000039696635,0.000098872704,0.0011568725,0.000002104379,0.00005973012,0.000018485376,0.9894983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00014494616,0.00010834862,0.00037414295,0.00028695448,0.000360626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.000051242267,0.00014685592,0.00040633522,0.00019834762,0.00021557152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857286,0.00017359815,0.00021110065,0.0000863407,0.00095847005,0.00011146012,0.0008660532,0.00039935156,0.0001276099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152395705,0.00020973122,0.0001317593,0.000045465393,0.00064752385,0.000087858054,0.0003040098,0.00033021744,0.0016100289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272979,0.000008916045,0.000001841033,0.0000125013985,0.000022840626,0.0000047836447,0.00024107621,7.516388e-7,0.0000039424745,0.29569677,0.70378184,0.00021645456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015847865,0.00001000528,0.000018129129,0.000029625562,0.000038599803,3.7792682e-7,0.00041646563,0.000010707584,0.000051044135,9.660291e-7,0.9990204,0.00024522492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011503459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29569578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026606026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050177996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240620864","doi":"10.3138/9781442687745","title":"Contextual Subjects","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.034240323381895026,"score_gpt":0.24969382104529755,"score_spread":0.21545349766340252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240620864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026163267,0.00085871055,0.000047950616,0.000026538892,0.00008140195,0.0003099863,0.00009346168,0.00006650515,0.99848926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016485637,0.0010936245,0.00013074839,0.000019479765,0.00016766302,3.252365e-7,0.00001471043,0.000010668882,0.9969142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991451,0.000054908676,0.00009876232,0.00021571768,0.00029931648,0.00018623045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922335,0.00007018081,0.00018049091,0.0002606137,0.00013954632,0.00012583447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008542466,0.000120410084,0.00023107683,0.000009788705,0.00047940653,0.000012149889,0.00056521565,0.0002682529,0.00023680677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001028147,0.00015469501,0.0001497998,0.000001055072,0.00061942945,0.00009533791,0.0001435285,0.0001335826,0.000016675258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025573374,0.000021925525,0.0000029296675,0.000023218581,0.00006660828,0.000016114049,0.038080797,8.0706496e-7,0.000007818824,0.8273703,0.13028237,0.004101552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019866957,0.000018404971,0.000021972985,0.000033387038,0.00004405605,4.0144926e-7,0.00034217734,0.0000018153851,0.000009442097,0.00023088726,0.99894446,0.00015431733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44400355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25896016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8686621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047770675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007166237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7545619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240797935","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.17006263.v1","title":"To punish or not punish: a comparative analysis of the legislative treatment of exemplary damages in Commonwealth jurisdictions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Commonwealth; Legislature; Legislation; Political science; Law; Common law; Intellectual property; Business","score_opus":0.08846968357664861,"score_gpt":0.4150822134370851,"score_spread":0.32661252986043654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240797935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6762352,0.00005554923,0.00003299002,0.00172686,0.00010035847,0.0017318362,0.00042460294,0.000021635115,0.31967095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94836724,0.0001837612,0.00024965324,0.000061655766,0.000027231245,0.00031350172,0.0002637268,0.0000069103585,0.050526347],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983864,0.0002690478,0.00051541824,0.00026023018,0.00036677645,0.00020211494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984346,0.00036697474,0.00042596157,0.00040037397,0.0002777625,0.000094326046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018572615,0.00017660423,0.00066501705,0.00035180853,0.0003604974,0.000039819202,0.00040523327,0.00014939389,0.00042786237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034698955,0.00011088525,0.00025087481,0.0025039061,0.000164288,0.00011850204,0.000030337285,0.00012805912,0.000009054254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002151022,0.0016950332,0.013799026,0.000045257704,0.0019737405,8.9391074e-7,0.79655606,0.0009919443,0.00045722493,0.17884386,0.0031344695,0.0022873972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004840736,0.00031306208,0.73660237,0.00010593035,0.00161545,7.579369e-8,0.13877055,0.0004899248,0.0020477257,0.00023467344,0.11895267,0.00038350746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14196107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67260593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72280335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022808457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000590035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86375266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240846124","doi":"10.1017/9781108605991.006","title":"The Incomplete Legal Transplant – Good Faith and the Common Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Faith; Good faith; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Common law; Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.02003519235862176,"score_gpt":0.21982929065122606,"score_spread":0.1997940982926043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240846124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012938252,0.00016870517,0.000055107783,0.0010818109,0.000115125025,0.0007352522,0.00029916197,0.000054516186,0.99736094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08693397,0.0004105188,0.000006314636,0.00018859262,0.00012727112,0.0000014095556,0.000013848694,0.000015454672,0.9123026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896806,0.00011984232,0.00013031381,0.0002611106,0.00028074358,0.00023994832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998878,0.00039302863,0.0001443983,0.00042168837,0.0000622001,0.00010068115],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034153112,0.00018252997,0.00024073754,0.00001942335,0.0021285275,0.00020769465,0.0007573957,0.00017521961,0.0000021129324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000023988691,0.00012545275,0.00014373747,0.000006912302,0.0019675083,0.000078237324,0.00022123288,0.00044380195,0.000012961399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064822045,0.0000022806582,0.0000016719916,0.000010027599,0.000057081652,0.000009310637,0.00045366483,6.946982e-7,0.0000014706683,0.99676526,0.0022625984,0.00037110143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005399006,0.0000109887305,0.00001588955,0.00003493611,0.00013681056,0.000003029183,0.00025268094,0.000026246684,0.0000043920695,0.0002923466,0.9985083,0.00017450356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012387206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028817935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99647295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008217777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014084193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240867105","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2008.20280","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.3816856800491292,"score_gpt":0.363145421978042,"score_spread":0.018540258071087168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240867105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42021453,0.0006668804,0.00082226656,0.07737128,0.00031590147,0.00031379928,0.0000034325797,0.00024222987,0.50004965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941218,0.000029496861,0.00045975833,0.00037180202,0.00018769247,0.000005167406,0.0000011402003,0.000004925193,0.0048182216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994548,0.00003838526,0.00005598796,0.000111496985,0.00014601165,0.00019330476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997708,0.00002974654,0.000018932575,0.000074728974,0.00001775413,0.00008802492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001300153,0.000041125393,0.000049442697,0.00002094691,0.00064655056,0.00002473565,0.00007431515,0.00004413736,0.000037804595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003199588,0.000041987438,0.000017957169,0.00010034999,0.00045776917,0.00008618124,0.000004238981,0.00007015899,0.000053702533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021135975,0.0003205216,0.015667442,0.000023417575,0.000022199452,0.0000124184335,0.28181207,0.000005186217,0.00053797395,0.564273,0.030282969,0.10702165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008216688,0.00007832442,0.10506337,0.00016495008,0.00003536672,0.000029367926,0.08518758,0.00009507539,0.00045781693,0.018701589,0.78884673,0.00051818206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022694936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003617338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75856376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059303755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062812745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49728096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241826473","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2009.20605","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.263302178068504,"score_gpt":0.3747734113707417,"score_spread":0.11147123330223774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241826473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09787249,0.00060090196,0.0009400819,0.25696382,0.00022235273,0.00030619054,0.0000023082252,0.00023971758,0.6428521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995838,0.000010216612,0.00046804664,0.0010417604,0.0001867128,0.0000018881474,0.0000010650863,0.0000027622073,0.002449534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947846,0.000033747572,0.000054514207,0.000109089524,0.00012909823,0.00019507506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999789,0.000020094647,0.000018468778,0.000072961004,0.000015050678,0.00008440302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017018896,0.00004092182,0.00004711988,0.000020659507,0.0003453493,0.00006307694,0.00007575626,0.000044004042,0.000026107396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002847288,0.000041445415,0.000016850914,0.00009855417,0.00016496284,0.00008813348,0.0000019330876,0.00006780197,0.000031819447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070978804,0.00011356521,0.0004985787,0.000003912756,0.0000037553518,0.0000010931336,0.038955543,0.0000015287573,0.00035700784,0.62448186,0.0055012563,0.33007482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008635979,0.00019470936,0.11234015,0.00026966186,0.000053908338,0.0000057631983,0.08991564,0.00012956584,0.0005443111,0.16844496,0.6266514,0.0005863455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070714734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020496527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89796555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005796987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036693113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26561826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241856650","doi":"10.1017/9781316181744.011","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241856650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033347285,0.00006329861,0.00078562077,0.0001112015,0.0008104081,0.0003757862,0.00036771156,0.00008237588,0.99707013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008933154,0.00019274896,0.000039696635,0.000098872704,0.0011568725,0.000002104379,0.00005973012,0.000018485376,0.9894983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00014494616,0.00010834862,0.00037414295,0.00028695448,0.000360626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.000051242267,0.00014685592,0.00040633522,0.00019834762,0.00021557152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857286,0.00017359815,0.00021110065,0.0000863407,0.00095847005,0.00011146012,0.0008660532,0.00039935156,0.0001276099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152395705,0.00020973122,0.0001317593,0.000045465393,0.00064752385,0.000087858054,0.0003040098,0.00033021744,0.0016100289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272979,0.000008916045,0.000001841033,0.0000125013985,0.000022840626,0.0000047836447,0.00024107621,7.516388e-7,0.0000039424745,0.29569677,0.70378184,0.00021645456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015847865,0.00001000528,0.000018129129,0.000029625562,0.000038599803,3.7792682e-7,0.00041646563,0.000010707584,0.000051044135,9.660291e-7,0.9990204,0.00024522492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011503459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29569578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026606026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050177996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241900139","doi":"10.1017/9781108380072.014","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241900139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024993552,0.00009216014,0.0007617439,0.000121078076,0.0010742764,0.00052258326,0.00039964163,0.000068098954,0.9967105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016823798,0.00023037005,0.000019908555,0.000102615806,0.0004816992,0.0000017692024,0.0000725004,0.000019033556,0.9822483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874145,0.00013752861,0.00010559282,0.00037223706,0.00029489337,0.00034828298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.00006893886,0.00014846036,0.0004343169,0.00013297697,0.0001737184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012737447,0.0001739766,0.00023954261,0.00008710378,0.0005774884,0.00010308849,0.00082794135,0.0004025431,0.00008085685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010849748,0.0002112687,0.00014829778,0.000040509865,0.0002851073,0.000091724985,0.00028449946,0.00041884778,0.0024215307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007589759,0.000008544991,0.000003831911,0.000021782593,0.000023286479,0.0000038784656,0.00018192975,0.000008983049,0.000005154923,0.3882697,0.6112349,0.00023041076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955167,0.0000070813667,0.000024606443,0.00003144459,0.000031978958,2.8661168e-7,0.00047870295,0.000018955674,0.000027432096,4.5485612e-7,0.998931,0.00025256057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012339986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053883246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38826922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028266988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005811423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242060588","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198799986.013.50","title":"Facticity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Judicial review; Law; Facticity; Political science; Common law; Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09019605841147635,"score_gpt":0.3624829878023617,"score_spread":0.2722869293908854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242060588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012007079,0.00020469652,0.00039683154,0.012889972,0.00027497148,0.00018188679,0.00007020179,0.00014226613,0.98582715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01254553,0.028045747,0.0004045891,0.0011527884,0.0021313645,0.000029984756,0.00008110098,0.000013946048,0.95559496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991593,0.000048037688,0.00011212675,0.00020341008,0.00029450483,0.00018263007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953324,0.000067229266,0.00006321444,0.0001302459,0.000044170603,0.00016189044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007887898,0.00008782127,0.00014613844,0.000016107935,0.00034192967,0.000106297775,0.00031899105,0.00020851845,0.0035627112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098539036,0.00007504859,0.00007844336,0.00014547384,0.00008387723,0.000054973334,0.000074188756,0.00031627153,0.0014269669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.246857e-7,0.000010433918,0.00002078405,0.0000122247875,0.000008897458,6.504416e-7,0.00058095716,6.213958e-8,4.6163972e-8,0.24681874,0.73148143,0.021065328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021539925,0.000003490855,0.00004049011,0.00001005234,0.000013516613,4.805317e-8,0.00041768132,0.0000022500378,0.0000015168187,0.0019150142,0.9974723,0.00010213942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006653326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025872139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2659908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008100336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005483651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242657117","doi":"10.12927/hcq.2009.20409","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; Weizmann Institute of Science; University of Alberta; Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes; McGill University","keywords":"Best practice; Medicine; Family medicine; Medical education; Nursing; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.026903875092829748,"score_gpt":0.36197772676583095,"score_spread":0.3350738516730012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242657117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49521005,0.00084315595,0.00063395797,0.38387072,0.00027974296,0.00091543264,0.000026374235,0.00035221435,0.11786834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969654,0.000049827933,0.00030701736,0.001814663,0.00018892522,0.000010700811,0.0000027501706,0.0000028491147,0.00065785117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933237,0.000060547747,0.00010660516,0.00013957618,0.0001492179,0.0002117015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962515,0.00001711379,0.000030893618,0.00011127401,0.000039652823,0.00017592608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019140138,0.000048964685,0.000069457135,0.00002180307,0.00042994518,0.000054538883,0.00007772675,0.000048908205,0.000023386945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000059479094,0.000047596368,0.000019168521,0.00010039868,0.00004960512,0.00009817267,0.000002595805,0.00007201936,0.000052461066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000285538,0.000028023484,0.0006380942,0.000005712681,0.0000016254122,0.0000013963108,0.0149886,3.2982488e-8,0.000019440846,0.5433226,0.0009646785,0.4400269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003021916,0.0007108203,0.08190098,0.00002249387,0.00000594519,0.000002806215,0.010856964,0.000022919294,0.00000796544,0.070262514,0.8357015,0.00020290105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032396463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014966297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8347368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044035947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012500341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48973978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242841926","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u200343","title":"M’Goun, Archibald, (1853–5 June 1921), KC; MA, BCL; Professor of Civil Law, M’Gill University, Montreal, since 1888","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.029307430762699187,"score_gpt":0.29768827026619465,"score_spread":0.26838083950349545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242841926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013392083,0.0016847752,0.00011878561,0.0044530127,0.0007747661,0.0009855838,0.00085432944,0.00015154626,0.989638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044852167,0.035677418,0.00023627785,0.00033188582,0.0013368472,0.000015301388,0.00029056458,0.000069295245,0.91719025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963369,0.0003044108,0.0005585919,0.0007703272,0.001112131,0.0009176378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974675,0.00035555128,0.0006182965,0.0007940342,0.00036597924,0.00039864294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006879676,0.0004436557,0.00084534613,0.00024037113,0.0011955831,0.00012417366,0.0015191805,0.00077155157,0.00039327084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009477299,0.00045370215,0.0003376036,0.00080335303,0.0011252409,0.00027216662,0.0005251333,0.00093314564,0.00017989962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005392326,0.00030158146,0.00028216926,0.00034743166,0.00013151832,0.000037439506,0.004216602,0.000006994503,0.000004492776,0.6521999,0.33261508,0.009802844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041397774,0.00003972521,0.0008634773,0.00064716773,0.00012856512,0.0000014810312,0.0020180924,0.000010829705,0.000018382858,0.0036689707,0.99169683,0.0004925167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068349026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42957503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65908176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005067904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014497162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243010380","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u224152","title":"Cotes-Preedy, His Honour Judge Digby, (1875–16 Sept. 1942), JP; Barrister-at-law; Bencher of Inner Temple; Chairman Bucks Quarter Sessions since 1937; Chancellor of Diocese of Worcester since 1935; Chairman the Worcestershire Association","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Management; Engineering; Art; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03453864923791002,"score_gpt":0.3077397691471775,"score_spread":0.2732011199092675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243010380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17964318,0.0062086983,0.0006242084,0.008585386,0.0020613389,0.004146078,0.0027640283,0.00023360892,0.79573345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8680391,0.0031747466,0.000080274476,0.00036984697,0.0009131126,0.0001418959,0.00029590956,0.00009032158,0.12689482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935707,0.00075775484,0.0017016323,0.0009274267,0.0019048264,0.001137645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934366,0.0010636518,0.003040645,0.0014092966,0.00070857094,0.000341249],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002049974,0.00073964056,0.0015004282,0.00029051694,0.0011024515,0.00015509258,0.0017819544,0.001177351,0.000457709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027217634,0.0005818254,0.00064309844,0.0010885173,0.0010873232,0.00047722075,0.0005321819,0.001139022,0.000054058277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006518587,0.0041995575,0.1004924,0.0069855517,0.0031883453,0.000038946895,0.257843,0.0002472962,0.0022029823,0.14361468,0.44725388,0.03328151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092038175,0.00021010493,0.00804787,0.002716625,0.0004077605,0.000002410632,0.0047303946,0.00006216617,0.0016448981,0.0005430639,0.9796727,0.0010416275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070988424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025613585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6883959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010559337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006872857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243038383","doi":"10.22621/cfn.v118i2.963","title":"New titles","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Field-Naturalist","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.024408143281330088,"score_gpt":0.2876409314590307,"score_spread":0.2632327881777006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243038383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035239623,0.00009080328,0.000042687807,0.32455775,0.0002252859,0.000129282,0.000008912029,0.000030823187,0.6713905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9420106,0.000017542816,0.0002095632,0.0066478397,0.00041563745,0.0000036077518,0.0000038616713,0.000003991648,0.050687373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953437,0.000017299915,0.000054217446,0.00008653894,0.00010440243,0.00020315766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994858,0.00003971952,0.000016444768,0.00018454685,0.000025067135,0.0002484602],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012457302,0.00004188909,0.000039333823,0.000020644571,0.00083517365,0.00012461837,0.00033621478,0.00006772954,0.001804007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078460806,0.000030969048,0.000031819654,0.00014307657,0.00006392261,0.000058190268,0.000012839583,0.00014782604,0.0009266866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.8900966e-7,0.0000010173383,0.000031675936,4.798314e-7,0.0000028755665,0.0000019552858,0.0017832315,0.0000069734488,0.0000076489505,0.86710143,0.128316,0.002746238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004864762,0.0000017727407,0.0004893683,0.0000032681767,0.000003840891,7.0710155e-7,0.00029491307,7.758714e-7,0.00005770408,0.020777605,0.97826815,0.000053254444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96138287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93848664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002060172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009871636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243079077","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.241","title":"THE IDEA OF CONSIDERATION","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Doctrine; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Epistemology; Control (management); Contrast (vision); Legal doctrine; Law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03285581476177582,"score_gpt":0.2494688006652572,"score_spread":0.21661298590348138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243079077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029914243,0.00022351519,0.00082304515,0.0007475578,0.00008023202,0.00005514142,0.0000029116748,0.000005598821,0.96814775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980178,0.00032020145,0.00087334047,0.000010983639,0.000029173676,1.15832615e-8,9.6275905e-8,7.4550655e-7,0.00074763654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997035,0.000048741604,0.00005915467,0.000026266885,0.00010398498,0.000058351223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964136,0.00003683888,0.00010707135,0.000052269395,0.00012312969,0.00003933846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026220953,0.00001732317,0.000038069058,0.000002493413,0.0010434105,0.000009900316,0.00015274793,0.00001957612,0.00059227785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014169277,0.000014648737,0.000038291724,0.00001036743,0.00028256542,0.00019855097,0.000017557746,0.00003586694,0.0000023028397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009541095,0.000014221257,0.00028277637,5.319577e-7,0.000009925134,6.65699e-7,0.011337775,7.969788e-7,0.00006898172,0.9862513,0.00061526493,0.0014082511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026815984,0.000046990735,0.009585188,0.000010563629,0.000029139766,0.0000028983015,0.05817419,0.000014719707,0.00033132758,0.015096626,0.9163818,0.000058394835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1684138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4350659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97115463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055387824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062594074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8371238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243089165","doi":"10.1017/9781108648042.010","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243089165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033347285,0.00006329861,0.00078562077,0.0001112015,0.0008104081,0.0003757862,0.00036771156,0.00008237588,0.99707013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008933154,0.00019274896,0.000039696635,0.000098872704,0.0011568725,0.000002104379,0.00005973012,0.000018485376,0.9894983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00014494616,0.00010834862,0.00037414295,0.00028695448,0.000360626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.000051242267,0.00014685592,0.00040633522,0.00019834762,0.00021557152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857286,0.00017359815,0.00021110065,0.0000863407,0.00095847005,0.00011146012,0.0008660532,0.00039935156,0.0001276099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152395705,0.00020973122,0.0001317593,0.000045465393,0.00064752385,0.000087858054,0.0003040098,0.00033021744,0.0016100289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272979,0.000008916045,0.000001841033,0.0000125013985,0.000022840626,0.0000047836447,0.00024107621,7.516388e-7,0.0000039424745,0.29569677,0.70378184,0.00021645456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015847865,0.00001000528,0.000018129129,0.000029625562,0.000038599803,3.7792682e-7,0.00041646563,0.000010707584,0.000051044135,9.660291e-7,0.9990204,0.00024522492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011503459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29569578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026606026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050177996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243175927","doi":"10.1017/9781316104415","title":"Obligations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; CLARITY; Statute; Common law; Comparative law; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.043356599858313465,"score_gpt":0.2704961509101615,"score_spread":0.22713955105184802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243175927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001968713,0.000038384605,0.00015817404,0.00022673792,0.00019010268,0.0003973484,0.00032129686,0.00015029713,0.99849796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006714554,0.00011524736,0.000063491316,0.00004598942,0.00047705107,0.0000019020955,0.000062490166,0.000017679202,0.9985447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990179,0.000057182006,0.0000956596,0.00030451777,0.0002703979,0.00025435816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870753,0.00006482826,0.00022408657,0.0006329501,0.00016957265,0.00020102895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014774715,0.00015117366,0.00018802194,0.000071949966,0.0021481884,0.00017948901,0.0010395282,0.00031308437,0.000007333874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034052082,0.00019242176,0.00015787248,0.00000817675,0.00067356834,0.00013327363,0.00026197746,0.00032903417,0.00007122413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019545068,0.000004125293,0.000001020837,0.000007610239,0.000019199037,0.000011746829,0.00015156872,2.3624224e-7,0.0000015211747,0.6813605,0.3179871,0.00045339248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001241336,0.0000047441144,0.000023602854,0.000043432086,0.00008523803,4.4075517e-7,0.00010155383,0.000004024639,0.000008954399,0.000078725505,0.99930996,0.00021518004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027294864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014758049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6813229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041243673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011604906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243188477","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2007.19460","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.2800880149550174,"score_gpt":0.3868590186325664,"score_spread":0.10677100367754899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243188477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18975292,0.0005143994,0.005858759,0.054981425,0.00040736914,0.00031249117,0.0000021709784,0.00021506142,0.7479554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957543,0.000005799189,0.0006922256,0.000419714,0.00024839904,0.0000017623687,9.977039e-7,0.0000049296223,0.0028718845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993937,0.000023780225,0.000068592664,0.00010905377,0.00014953094,0.00025532022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997281,0.00005401002,0.000021599142,0.00007080012,0.00001880467,0.00010667394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005397831,0.00004050246,0.000044106157,0.000028500152,0.00036923744,0.000046501475,0.00007382066,0.000051814306,0.00003098513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039596453,0.00004157988,0.000016504173,0.00011832022,0.0002826399,0.000075749755,0.0000041714056,0.00007573617,0.00003746162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015480871,0.00011636706,0.0042101964,0.000011834643,0.000008584504,0.000002910558,0.06880857,8.0616735e-7,0.00050513266,0.6390617,0.0036308067,0.28362763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056749646,0.00005720824,0.088550396,0.00015918161,0.000034544268,0.000004728995,0.1661742,0.000028887776,0.0009323642,0.028820936,0.7142864,0.0003836323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020874731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017788188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80600137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080684345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035314875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28399134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243315529","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00440","title":"Against Restitution","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Obligation; Economic Justice; Normative; Law and economics; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Rest (music); Sociology; Unjust enrichment; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13798997686747863,"score_gpt":0.4396970784488198,"score_spread":0.3017071015813412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243315529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04081483,0.00047338713,0.00016568966,0.012521294,0.00012960183,0.00009340087,0.0000028833358,0.00006866242,0.94573027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970873,0.00013912497,0.00025546458,0.00072511693,0.00014285027,0.000020380447,3.7468456e-7,0.0000020010814,0.0016273963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993776,0.00005995395,0.00007457165,0.000086407206,0.000120281824,0.0002812016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964416,0.00011676032,0.000010053048,0.000064668,0.000062007304,0.000102379716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020357294,0.000036830956,0.000061584615,0.0000098618775,0.00059552764,0.000019862888,0.00005111978,0.000023080482,0.000022234575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001148457,0.000030782096,0.000025030567,0.00009049773,0.000416523,0.000045802197,0.00001672319,0.000045373043,0.00014424251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.1462054e-7,0.00001380222,0.0007058829,0.0000018204046,0.0000064281335,4.78882e-7,0.0005520725,4.3511525e-7,0.0000074787204,0.9977244,0.0007790796,0.00020787881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043875116,0.0000040403866,0.00094635214,0.0000040407213,0.00000542824,1.2576383e-7,0.004328618,0.0000010135981,0.00009905951,0.14072196,0.8537935,0.000051996536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031522923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024890402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104707906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005610008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45803776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243534525","doi":"10.22215/etd/2008-13055","title":"Valuing privacy, evaluating expectations: toward a consistent approach to privacy in English and Canadian common law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Information privacy; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08326819221815666,"score_gpt":0.36736469380813125,"score_spread":0.28409650158997457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243534525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41714826,0.00036741677,0.000021583812,0.0009863988,0.00016999307,0.0017547383,0.00002090549,0.00009654156,0.57943416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98971313,0.00008530001,0.0052135168,0.0004208063,0.00017549173,0.00056249206,0.00033663388,0.000027926219,0.0034647237],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795985,0.00017593539,0.00044042463,0.0004902688,0.0004746426,0.00045889194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874693,0.00015595181,0.00012776094,0.0002662646,0.00028359503,0.00041952412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052764115,0.00020802346,0.0003095263,0.00024191933,0.0009397547,0.00025089417,0.0003800354,0.00024074275,0.00003836295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048827325,0.00022547392,0.00006668106,0.000491894,0.00008951809,0.00019076373,0.00004845165,0.00031113692,0.000016015516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010602552,0.000096445496,0.0008514471,0.00007015291,0.000025916519,0.000002957113,0.6517237,0.000061987485,0.000024629508,0.34216267,0.0016013479,0.0033681735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011119111,0.00010581732,0.024890797,0.00044527376,0.0001273,0.0000042053716,0.68278486,0.0014755031,0.00010652847,0.0059553855,0.2812471,0.0017453037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6689552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82380086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57596946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005282396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012772382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91945595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243929112","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.dagan","title":"INSIDE PROPERTY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Autonomy; Property rights; Property law; Tangible property; Corporate governance; Business; Public property; Interpersonal communication; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025693669923225436,"score_gpt":0.2590236299858315,"score_spread":0.23332996006260606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243929112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020629466,0.0002957626,0.00032365744,0.0011500198,0.00011286059,0.000050327744,0.0000022800182,0.00001294577,0.97742265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364287,0.0002052842,0.0012585332,0.0000447166,0.00020610027,1.6036555e-8,2.2682921e-7,0.0000015400738,0.0046407226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995988,0.000048406197,0.000044880948,0.00003215676,0.00013673237,0.00013903326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999658,0.000012467785,0.000057991612,0.00005364396,0.000066882094,0.00015099664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026060452,0.000025983829,0.000049827584,0.0000039427714,0.0008607793,0.000013866966,0.00016714822,0.000029395214,0.0015293383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009140933,0.000021346797,0.00004478316,0.000014838088,0.0001430516,0.00066111836,0.000031581312,0.000059409776,0.000021530872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014469291,0.00012253314,0.0042030993,0.000002753312,0.000024338173,0.0000023553346,0.029202648,0.0000031252234,0.00021705545,0.94969875,0.0066254684,0.009883412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000979528,0.00000803814,0.0031926273,0.0000041976764,0.000009387341,0.0000023918199,0.010467892,0.0000020122943,0.000017775827,0.00017322558,0.98598826,0.00003623289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1863979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1845904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018237236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005270743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244696259","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_1077","title":"The Snowdon Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Savoy Foundation; Menzies Foundation; Samuel H. Kress Foundation","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.02928296900471215,"score_gpt":0.28486759391795535,"score_spread":0.2555846249132432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244696259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044516375,0.00045182023,0.000025536732,0.0007371073,0.0004213994,0.000594461,0.00007130825,0.00012092298,0.9975329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6736517,0.00033866928,0.000051824478,0.00020170902,0.0017143495,0.000041991,0.000012962319,0.000046059013,0.32394072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998222,0.00004573343,0.00032923993,0.00039904582,0.00052802626,0.00047594248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845743,0.00020390838,0.0002435064,0.00071073516,0.00017691437,0.00020747592],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005389543,0.00028729637,0.00024459098,0.00005183564,0.0019050706,0.00024320571,0.00083594816,0.00034212618,0.001492543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049448267,0.00021138557,0.00023797726,0.000019675417,0.0011613268,4.5451208e-7,0.00017943647,0.00031813353,0.0016294859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004074576,1.0238523e-7,0.000012480264,0.000003996338,0.00003649325,0.000002730036,0.0013465789,3.1935606e-8,0.000005145713,0.98674935,0.000777779,0.011061236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004528173,0.000012916802,0.000025329116,0.000016232418,0.000022662045,7.12592e-7,0.00013422509,0.0000015038906,0.000008384336,0.5049406,0.49463385,0.00015828718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005701862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049873446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67360723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012682396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025339465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245107195","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u233835","title":"Young, M‘gregor, (6 June 1864–1 April 1942), Official Guardian, Supreme Court of Ontario, since 1928; late Lecturer, Law School of Ontario","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Supreme court; Law; History; Political science; Genealogy","score_opus":0.02601265298861979,"score_gpt":0.284876630611003,"score_spread":0.2588639776223832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245107195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016067147,0.0017106531,0.00013499027,0.0009115483,0.002093527,0.001234462,0.0004900324,0.00010163653,0.977256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043077197,0.003202541,0.0006661825,0.00042267898,0.0019831904,0.000051809617,0.00046527977,0.0000962839,0.95003486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948755,0.00016885181,0.0012872743,0.0008978871,0.0017198349,0.0010506845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966067,0.00017142556,0.0010504422,0.0010296411,0.0006594412,0.00048234704],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010021282,0.0006410212,0.0014876754,0.00023385312,0.0006604656,0.0001758478,0.0014411017,0.0012530811,0.0022081076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014157571,0.0006335578,0.00061228854,0.000610565,0.0009940519,0.00028144498,0.00030998333,0.001755658,0.00018393401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034362706,0.0010055025,0.013888227,0.0006713413,0.0009483734,0.000046777834,0.049641024,0.00019727164,0.000052655145,0.22379042,0.7044026,0.0050121364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005149999,0.000075891505,0.0048021604,0.00058751117,0.00024698116,0.0000024293336,0.00016620701,0.0000030821066,0.00011964825,0.0021322481,0.9907143,0.00063451513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9267781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2863117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034493532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01495169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245436203","doi":"10.4324/9780203640142","title":"Charity Law and Social Inclusion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03779091349812058,"score_gpt":0.3424177269574897,"score_spread":0.3046268134593691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245436203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029247369,0.00006859924,0.00007130311,0.003418497,0.000056321132,0.00017533399,0.000015462872,0.00006740647,0.9960978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0117678,0.000082855775,0.00011880073,0.0023930352,0.001037671,0.0000043678083,0.000027304328,0.000008748301,0.9845594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999278,0.000017371072,0.000105694795,0.00016424981,0.00027784266,0.00015682535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999721,0.000045943332,0.000055031578,0.000069752045,0.00004696986,0.00006128285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043278653,0.00007777593,0.00011160106,0.000021484604,0.002475767,0.00005381637,0.00016121699,0.00030975908,0.0004413027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000048392494,0.00007303651,0.000042103275,0.000030908668,0.0004203176,0.00005633256,0.00050284324,0.0001983089,0.00006999325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.805659e-7,0.0000067734236,0.0000021148114,0.000006038365,0.0000027104809,4.874289e-7,0.003590296,2.983267e-9,0.000001822108,0.97594374,0.018200232,0.0022450879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032524084,0.0000026834743,0.000017511691,0.0000037791392,0.000007085554,8.637643e-8,0.000106039,5.7851054e-7,0.0000014286412,0.12615226,0.8735901,0.00008591645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00721894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032069553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8553899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013322699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021364479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245529688","doi":"10.1093/tandt/12.8.26","title":"Canada (Ontario)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Business; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.009592202141141952,"score_gpt":0.23947743661880025,"score_spread":0.2298852344776583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245529688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3507368,0.00006064705,0.000019534544,0.0045214393,0.00016679832,0.0001510888,0.00001295762,0.00006661466,0.64426416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92032367,0.0000036791375,0.00019453245,0.0003156089,0.0003171584,0.000018270192,0.000006920423,0.0000065934,0.07881358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991048,0.000029609144,0.00013886623,0.000151682,0.00029024621,0.00028478616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996305,0.000043757653,0.000043751443,0.00015719126,0.000041172934,0.00008364418],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012077189,0.00007437828,0.00008964253,0.000017335793,0.0004958883,0.00006665181,0.00022099778,0.000045996418,0.0014890747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013509532,0.00007137909,0.00003368872,0.000109886794,0.000084687184,0.00009405203,0.000024399755,0.00009295794,0.00005551513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042293173,0.000050080205,0.034300666,0.0000037665932,0.000008575719,0.000008893087,0.0018251995,0.000085560576,0.000041440748,0.84336525,0.11717437,0.0031319575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009104048,0.0000029779935,0.0660127,0.0000023022544,0.0000063928655,4.505961e-7,0.00037263866,0.000005676967,0.000056182802,0.0025324025,0.9308199,0.00009731116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8408328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004586362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018999235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245667600","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198738466.003.0005","title":"Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memorandum; Memorandum of understanding; Advice (programming); Wright; Legal advice; Insolvency; Legal action; Bankruptcy; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.07195046260451768,"score_gpt":0.3057933545042528,"score_spread":0.23384289189973514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245667600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.6153216e-7,0.00009628536,0.0000098648,0.0056226873,0.00010044933,0.00008510188,0.00003328319,0.000025396743,0.99402654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020776044,0.000034034758,0.000045930006,0.00047968797,0.0003443867,0.0000024272576,0.000008601072,0.0000072262355,0.9970001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947447,0.0000028975937,0.000065185945,0.000089931054,0.00027795113,0.0000895672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963754,0.000016051707,0.000031744614,0.000113328315,0.00007977465,0.00012153506],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008819245,0.000052716285,0.0000663752,0.0000076189813,0.00013686596,0.00001955175,0.00015310633,0.00007953128,0.0040189847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009989618,0.000047763933,0.000019942645,0.000007723558,0.000051602212,0.000016910595,0.000026217918,0.00008290807,0.00022654343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.133885e-8,2.8410707e-7,2.9148168e-7,3.0459847e-7,0.0000017947697,5.6075396e-7,0.000028099186,1.5165634e-7,2.0937971e-8,0.62682223,0.37242532,0.0007208919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011262082,9.3089056e-7,9.95268e-7,0.000002341671,0.0000039325423,6.051733e-8,0.000040024708,4.020123e-7,1.2945162e-7,0.046207294,0.95366484,0.00006780287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98265237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58123946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002653946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004124065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246024616","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511570834","title":"The Theory of Contract Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Contract theory; Public law; Law; Philosophy of law; Normative; Exclusion clause; Frustration of purpose; Political science; Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Privity of contract; Contract management","score_opus":0.02622442049486077,"score_gpt":0.24291232471329388,"score_spread":0.21668790421843312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246024616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034184497,0.00015398355,0.00013380214,0.0000888119,0.00010852797,0.000385844,0.00014726858,0.00005397556,0.9988936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006079704,0.00034030844,0.000008951568,0.00006391737,0.00019540919,0.0000010997014,0.000011201568,0.000012307396,0.9932871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900746,0.00017854708,0.00013058847,0.00019038383,0.00025976362,0.00023327858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986345,0.00049329933,0.00022030136,0.0003864368,0.00016224824,0.000103214865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042750654,0.00012479498,0.00018552973,0.000023961557,0.0010717419,0.00005259825,0.00079322566,0.00021574966,0.000005283782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023398426,0.000111442,0.00016297413,0.000014116726,0.0013627,0.000055333632,0.00015369176,0.0002857001,0.000008392802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024581035,0.000007422296,7.6526123e-7,0.000007906969,0.00004704769,0.000009321546,0.00024645284,3.7115657e-7,0.0000036393099,0.95391834,0.044427816,0.0013063562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013902383,0.000008337319,0.000009139271,0.000027740723,0.00008510404,5.260386e-7,0.00037006816,0.0000018423818,0.000027276523,0.0004556128,0.99875164,0.00012371798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031313836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003217884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95432377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019685598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004756826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82430804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246837131","doi":"10.1017/9781316594216.018","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Statistics; World Wide Web; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246837131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033347285,0.00006329861,0.00078562077,0.0001112015,0.0008104081,0.0003757862,0.00036771156,0.00008237588,0.99707013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008933154,0.00019274896,0.000039696635,0.000098872704,0.0011568725,0.000002104379,0.00005973012,0.000018485376,0.9894983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00014494616,0.00010834862,0.00037414295,0.00028695448,0.000360626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.000051242267,0.00014685592,0.00040633522,0.00019834762,0.00021557152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857286,0.00017359815,0.00021110065,0.0000863407,0.00095847005,0.00011146012,0.0008660532,0.00039935156,0.0001276099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152395705,0.00020973122,0.0001317593,0.000045465393,0.00064752385,0.000087858054,0.0003040098,0.00033021744,0.0016100289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272979,0.000008916045,0.000001841033,0.0000125013985,0.000022840626,0.0000047836447,0.00024107621,7.516388e-7,0.0000039424745,0.29569677,0.70378184,0.00021645456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015847865,0.00001000528,0.000018129129,0.000029625562,0.000038599803,3.7792682e-7,0.00041646563,0.000010707584,0.000051044135,9.660291e-7,0.9990204,0.00024522492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011503459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29569578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026606026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050177996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246999568","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.3.731","title":"MISFEASANCE AS AN ORGANIZING NORMATIVE IDEA IN PRIVATE LAW","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Tort; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Meaning (existential); Private law; Relation (database); Liability; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.011420385509152866,"score_gpt":0.2647944649778695,"score_spread":0.25337407946871665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246999568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58446556,0.000026204274,0.00012067452,0.00082176883,0.000088407694,0.00006659563,0.0000041734756,0.000013844942,0.4143928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971211,0.00006263053,0.0023161497,0.00008931543,0.000094171366,3.2404202e-8,7.010832e-7,0.0000029480254,0.00031294394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943644,0.00006690347,0.00008866281,0.000080956015,0.0001750181,0.00015200219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995133,0.0000255609,0.00011091357,0.00009800296,0.00010666895,0.00014554519],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034157035,0.000046816873,0.00008548674,0.00000917581,0.0009282188,0.000044463202,0.00037416036,0.000058056088,0.0011424817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018711875,0.000052891548,0.000034810364,0.000042068023,0.00027913516,0.0011019895,0.000046857127,0.00021901997,0.000017151388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010532667,0.000045998528,0.0008472116,0.0000014105731,0.000005443965,0.0000074807967,0.018340703,0.0000043625164,0.0017300897,0.9784048,0.000053995445,0.00054796715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006726562,0.000056951416,0.011828018,0.000027201862,0.00001553175,0.000011417926,0.03609273,0.00004020955,0.0005650192,0.013864226,0.9366379,0.00018818695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32118005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8537992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9645406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016512487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008204211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247371023","doi":"10.1017/9781108290135.021","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247371023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024993552,0.00009216014,0.0007617439,0.000121078076,0.0010742764,0.00052258326,0.00039964163,0.000068098954,0.9967105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016823798,0.00023037005,0.000019908555,0.000102615806,0.0004816992,0.0000017692024,0.0000725004,0.000019033556,0.9822483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874145,0.00013752861,0.00010559282,0.00037223706,0.00029489337,0.00034828298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.00006893886,0.00014846036,0.0004343169,0.00013297697,0.0001737184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012737447,0.0001739766,0.00023954261,0.00008710378,0.0005774884,0.00010308849,0.00082794135,0.0004025431,0.00008085685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010849748,0.0002112687,0.00014829778,0.000040509865,0.0002851073,0.000091724985,0.00028449946,0.00041884778,0.0024215307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007589759,0.000008544991,0.000003831911,0.000021782593,0.000023286479,0.0000038784656,0.00018192975,0.000008983049,0.000005154923,0.3882697,0.6112349,0.00023041076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955167,0.0000070813667,0.000024606443,0.00003144459,0.000031978958,2.8661168e-7,0.00047870295,0.000018955674,0.000027432096,4.5485612e-7,0.998931,0.00025256057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012339986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053883246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38826922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028266988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005811423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247494791","doi":"10.1017/9781108648042.004","title":"Private Separation Deeds in Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Separation (statistics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Internet privacy; Business; Mathematics; Physics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.05378966785975325,"score_gpt":0.29308853099914745,"score_spread":0.2392988631393942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247494791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002425994,0.000012845348,0.0003523874,0.00006536741,0.0001383815,0.00041414384,0.0000463617,0.00008963998,0.9964549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0120392,0.00012000562,0.00006513336,0.00003491525,0.0002989399,0.000001307993,0.000029426736,0.000015194825,0.9873959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991315,0.000044047294,0.00012416212,0.00028720283,0.0002169615,0.00019613875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993748,0.000031826625,0.00014834167,0.00024558004,0.00010071051,0.00009872967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016221324,0.00014218563,0.00015529452,0.00012294186,0.00038334067,0.00005497664,0.00031041168,0.00031196856,0.000025015017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008471033,0.00018198304,0.00008129969,0.000015501028,0.00028751369,0.00014521675,0.00012004304,0.00024849744,0.00006952329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017751341,0.0000056386266,0.0000051681127,0.000009624906,0.00001332277,0.000008343465,0.00046217706,0.0000013606318,0.000032555934,0.99024856,0.008557249,0.0006382272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016110054,0.000012900248,0.000059749113,0.00003946514,0.000034570137,4.2867302e-7,0.00012818407,0.000025202135,0.00008629856,0.00012387444,0.9991367,0.00019154511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015349877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005883635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004209189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015856983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7421053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247679508","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.02","title":"The Society of Property","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Normative; Scope (computer science); Object (grammar); Business; Transaction cost; Freedom of contract; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021958059277297663,"score_gpt":0.25504533425970555,"score_spread":0.2330872749824079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247679508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019464178,0.0015280432,0.0007210771,0.0058226073,0.0001832707,0.00011919182,0.0000062234158,0.000011400912,0.972144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927026,0.00096675236,0.0010463208,0.000021287451,0.00012440064,1.8146473e-8,1.09546136e-7,0.0000011425609,0.0051373835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962705,0.00004282242,0.000050671384,0.000023028682,0.00014370323,0.00011269775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966174,0.000030660816,0.000088922025,0.00005767021,0.00008886671,0.00007214933],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044094934,0.000020755922,0.000042640335,0.0000010320622,0.0013160853,0.000010168354,0.00021685207,0.00002410001,0.00028249348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000059869694,0.000012994541,0.00010655499,0.000013917697,0.00031233465,0.00030964962,0.000033927285,0.0000518834,0.0000025805148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016025391,0.00009675723,0.0025017068,0.0000046552395,0.000066738496,1.5354765e-7,0.042905763,0.0000029590383,0.0003081535,0.92117023,0.02229987,0.010626969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007398901,0.000007388315,0.0015835915,0.0000035892683,0.000010993723,5.9689023e-7,0.025133826,0.0000055183486,0.000027311566,0.00015165358,0.9729807,0.000020853597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0887993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06692435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010709221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005302282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248006959","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511779008","title":"Vicarious Liability in Tort","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Strict liability; Liability; Delict; Legal liability; Law; Joint and several liability; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Comparative law; Private law; Public law; Black letter law; Psychology","score_opus":0.019382349724511222,"score_gpt":0.24619581855915557,"score_spread":0.22681346883464434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248006959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001306156,0.000022435906,0.000035394532,0.000114609466,0.00021397267,0.00060825463,0.00014148188,0.0001181006,0.9974396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044780863,0.000044328914,0.00007395045,0.000056273864,0.00027625036,0.0000027607646,0.000030161704,0.000016816111,0.99502134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986899,0.00009414876,0.00015874777,0.00043786998,0.00029250843,0.0003268345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989235,0.000108619664,0.00012756536,0.0005175636,0.00012419625,0.00019859878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030662355,0.000180732,0.00026472774,0.000094580086,0.00040075698,0.00006174197,0.0007641486,0.0006052006,0.000010935757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041630123,0.00022712749,0.00014084503,0.00002760778,0.0005706642,0.00008420768,0.00027668863,0.00087409705,0.000023696417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010478743,0.000022460488,0.000046457648,0.000019600046,0.000011513315,0.000032741173,0.0005385718,6.266861e-7,0.000009945101,0.9585151,0.040047657,0.00074484583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017834993,0.0000067273277,0.0003117434,0.000024873343,0.000035230507,3.3527468e-7,0.00012198486,0.000005345801,0.000012604084,0.00004717538,0.99901426,0.00024136278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010870538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028978628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071486493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012263979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99571615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248494748","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2009.20792","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.263302178068504,"score_gpt":0.3747734113707417,"score_spread":0.11147123330223774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248494748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09787249,0.00060090196,0.0009400819,0.25696382,0.00022235273,0.00030619054,0.0000023082252,0.00023971758,0.6428521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995838,0.000010216612,0.00046804664,0.0010417604,0.0001867128,0.0000018881474,0.0000010650863,0.0000027622073,0.002449534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947846,0.000033747572,0.000054514207,0.000109089524,0.00012909823,0.00019507506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999789,0.000020094647,0.000018468778,0.000072961004,0.000015050678,0.00008440302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017018896,0.00004092182,0.00004711988,0.000020659507,0.0003453493,0.00006307694,0.00007575626,0.000044004042,0.000026107396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002847288,0.000041445415,0.000016850914,0.00009855417,0.00016496284,0.00008813348,0.0000019330876,0.00006780197,0.000031819447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070978804,0.00011356521,0.0004985787,0.000003912756,0.0000037553518,0.0000010931336,0.038955543,0.0000015287573,0.00035700784,0.62448186,0.0055012563,0.33007482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008635979,0.00019470936,0.11234015,0.00026966186,0.000053908338,0.0000057631983,0.08991564,0.00012956584,0.0005443111,0.16844496,0.6266514,0.0005863455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070714734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020496527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89796555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005796987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036693113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26561826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248554395","doi":"10.1017/9781108643542.017","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; World Wide Web; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248554395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033347285,0.00006329861,0.00078562077,0.0001112015,0.0008104081,0.0003757862,0.00036771156,0.00008237588,0.99707013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008933154,0.00019274896,0.000039696635,0.000098872704,0.0011568725,0.000002104379,0.00005973012,0.000018485376,0.9894983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00014494616,0.00010834862,0.00037414295,0.00028695448,0.000360626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.000051242267,0.00014685592,0.00040633522,0.00019834762,0.00021557152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857286,0.00017359815,0.00021110065,0.0000863407,0.00095847005,0.00011146012,0.0008660532,0.00039935156,0.0001276099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152395705,0.00020973122,0.0001317593,0.000045465393,0.00064752385,0.000087858054,0.0003040098,0.00033021744,0.0016100289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272979,0.000008916045,0.000001841033,0.0000125013985,0.000022840626,0.0000047836447,0.00024107621,7.516388e-7,0.0000039424745,0.29569677,0.70378184,0.00021645456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015847865,0.00001000528,0.000018129129,0.000029625562,0.000038599803,3.7792682e-7,0.00041646563,0.000010707584,0.000051044135,9.660291e-7,0.9990204,0.00024522492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011503459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29569578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026606026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050177996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248566953","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.511","title":"TREBILCOCK'S HERESY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heresy; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Rule of law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.009960277216154228,"score_gpt":0.25230285097464383,"score_spread":0.2423425737584896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248566953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104846165,0.000056470875,0.00021319524,0.0017705702,0.00020231584,0.000043844357,0.000004732854,0.000016810023,0.89284587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393004,0.000100010075,0.0017845372,0.000029661493,0.00019758138,1.3593504e-8,3.08476e-7,0.0000018580866,0.003955975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958956,0.000030147645,0.000050788494,0.000053199987,0.00016616871,0.00011012387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995961,0.000020954256,0.00006876338,0.00008139325,0.00010148394,0.00013126503],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022701589,0.000030013076,0.000056399444,0.0000050580597,0.0010199662,0.000026725249,0.0002806589,0.0000552956,0.0045814654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011976582,0.000032318192,0.000063646556,0.00001687541,0.00022942324,0.00032285566,0.000028714623,0.00015463869,0.00001786349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084361345,0.000045329827,0.00055789115,9.609049e-7,0.000011589014,0.000004866139,0.005477766,0.0000017214963,0.00089246867,0.98468584,0.0026008282,0.0057123066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015679629,0.000011296973,0.0018041217,0.0000024881565,0.000008902971,0.0000030806127,0.0071267756,0.0000052383025,0.000028420463,0.0011878026,0.98962295,0.00004214948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20898737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7553338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071959985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008101902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249319386","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198793731.003.0001","title":"1 Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; CLARITY; Law; Political science; Task (project management); Management; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02645449307939088,"score_gpt":0.23432967216263462,"score_spread":0.20787517908324374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249319386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000126362,0.000015814025,0.00012811969,0.00058107905,0.00026192132,0.00033296357,0.000049149763,0.00010548232,0.9985128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004338549,0.0002471743,0.00008952498,0.000032732536,0.00088918296,3.3287608e-7,0.000021660931,0.00001559659,0.9982699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923396,0.00002079365,0.00007861445,0.00028264936,0.0002166079,0.00016735378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936515,0.000026020252,0.000117451054,0.00031634825,0.00008877757,0.000086223234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009851306,0.00012291339,0.00014462562,0.000058026097,0.00040524395,0.000044616852,0.0003517404,0.00025691258,0.00029709225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000044614053,0.00014928424,0.0001083076,0.000006010767,0.00019914674,0.00008472792,0.00013787563,0.0002538693,0.000023939554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008921071,0.00000311397,6.650466e-7,0.000008159024,0.000023012644,0.0000023793352,0.0003712731,0.0000028931213,0.000002832562,0.9800038,0.015632886,0.003940104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009223815,0.000009898447,0.0000020445477,0.000011471399,0.00005356934,3.165288e-7,0.00014945486,0.0000029883245,0.0000055489486,0.0014488149,0.99805516,0.00016848711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041219845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023893951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019615733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019779292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60876346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249394864","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498275.001","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Computer science","score_opus":0.03513649718592024,"score_gpt":0.24523338287804347,"score_spread":0.21009688569212323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249394864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052575586,0.00003959235,0.00013645018,0.00034039863,0.00017611762,0.0004172333,0.00032252164,0.00011984906,0.99839526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004567315,0.00011861422,0.00002471121,0.0003023147,0.0001849186,8.805791e-7,0.00002282718,0.000022211083,0.9947562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892336,0.00005088179,0.00011174827,0.00034400597,0.00029716815,0.00027282906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990003,0.00016996643,0.00014557029,0.00034419773,0.00013852323,0.00020142655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001435236,0.00020961232,0.00023789723,0.000076324264,0.0007027082,0.00006186466,0.0004114272,0.00033911958,0.000019351972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003801896,0.00023849093,0.00017873585,0.000008667664,0.00037524354,0.000048184604,0.00008819813,0.00034816714,0.000072152114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011860111,0.0000072314037,0.0000013164322,0.0000056083773,0.000033961314,0.00002469269,0.000094488016,0.0000010962166,0.0000032965297,0.96420646,0.03514422,0.0004657596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020596862,0.000018991048,0.000005042202,0.000038361824,0.00007106766,4.2400646e-7,0.00005556108,0.0000014929163,0.000058798923,0.000070827264,0.99921054,0.00026294126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009948935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049261154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96413565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031137868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016270482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249485481","doi":"10.7202/1021407ar","title":"Arbitrage — Caractère non recevable d'une objection de non-arbitrabilité fondé sur la présentation « tardive » du grief, invoquée à l'audition seulement","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Grief; Arbitrage; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Psychotherapist; Economics","score_opus":0.012806946134216199,"score_gpt":0.2620520152214924,"score_spread":0.2492450690872762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249485481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6172241,0.0004005828,0.047201436,0.07951212,0.0022744543,0.001988414,0.00019747776,0.0002225575,0.2509789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732255,0.0006229835,0.0012754926,0.00028050048,0.0021439004,0.000255555,0.0003130506,0.000044838645,0.021838209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969144,0.0006503125,0.0007029257,0.00057962956,0.0005464243,0.0006063294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975803,0.0009018178,0.00047470568,0.00042096054,0.00034549754,0.00027674553],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016050574,0.00032526706,0.00031504504,0.00016150712,0.0016479705,0.00023723306,0.00026894434,0.00086034887,0.00057851453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005582054,0.00037349365,0.00020795279,0.0015063512,0.00046106114,0.0010477523,0.00007815753,0.0011340267,0.0003999879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008126732,0.0021773565,0.062306874,0.00011803039,0.0004368634,0.000013752974,0.049232256,0.053052243,0.002706657,0.48654732,0.27289906,0.070428334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009608557,0.00015868146,0.034883212,0.00024052498,0.00031551078,0.000012944241,0.00612411,0.016955717,0.0016029465,0.014194857,0.9239757,0.00057493837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021266576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049000746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6510767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009149072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010039139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250377458","doi":"10.1017/9781108525251.022","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250377458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024993552,0.00009216014,0.0007617439,0.000121078076,0.0010742764,0.00052258326,0.00039964163,0.000068098954,0.9967105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016823798,0.00023037005,0.000019908555,0.000102615806,0.0004816992,0.0000017692024,0.0000725004,0.000019033556,0.9822483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874145,0.00013752861,0.00010559282,0.00037223706,0.00029489337,0.00034828298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.00006893886,0.00014846036,0.0004343169,0.00013297697,0.0001737184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012737447,0.0001739766,0.00023954261,0.00008710378,0.0005774884,0.00010308849,0.00082794135,0.0004025431,0.00008085685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010849748,0.0002112687,0.00014829778,0.000040509865,0.0002851073,0.000091724985,0.00028449946,0.00041884778,0.0024215307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007589759,0.000008544991,0.000003831911,0.000021782593,0.000023286479,0.0000038784656,0.00018192975,0.000008983049,0.000005154923,0.3882697,0.6112349,0.00023041076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955167,0.0000070813667,0.000024606443,0.00003144459,0.000031978958,2.8661168e-7,0.00047870295,0.000018955674,0.000027432096,4.5485612e-7,0.998931,0.00025256057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012339986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053883246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38826922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028266988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005811423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250732797","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199229772.001.0001","title":"Rights, Wrongs, and Injustices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.01759563370523861,"score_gpt":0.30141083246042727,"score_spread":0.2838151987551887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250732797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003439551,0.0002836888,0.00003121864,0.0009684386,0.000115433395,0.0002479424,0.00001674066,0.000057421268,0.9982447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018975505,0.00027020348,0.00018021683,0.0001697253,0.0004624066,0.000007139327,0.000015328711,0.000007027747,0.9969904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994065,0.000014932048,0.00009212411,0.00018220182,0.00017262781,0.00013157052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959564,0.00008956807,0.00006128674,0.00014232085,0.00003530783,0.000075851654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013664136,0.000081584425,0.00011647471,0.000025041663,0.00030811015,0.000104403734,0.00017577375,0.00018212914,0.0010463246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009209579,0.000064848435,0.000029679828,0.00002611096,0.00018463763,0.00007833007,0.000061765015,0.00013285759,0.00071152067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.15339e-7,0.00000300749,0.000006368834,0.000010594958,0.000005420847,2.065154e-7,0.0004301589,7.280852e-8,2.709758e-7,0.8690434,0.1295791,0.00092109083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029466719,0.0000052708688,0.000022802822,0.000013332607,0.00002224663,1.0462741e-7,0.000112002206,0.0000027574697,5.894928e-7,0.038968492,0.96072,0.0001029445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023689403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004548172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8311409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059879494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029533857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250971673","doi":"10.1017/9781108674355","title":"Judicial Review of Administrative Action Across the Common Law World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative law; Public law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Administrative law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Commercial law; Context (archaeology); Geography","score_opus":0.1026137046841454,"score_gpt":0.35736368588060735,"score_spread":0.25474998119646197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250971673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038087976,0.001480604,0.000021184867,0.00049601233,0.00015653226,0.0006193685,0.0004892562,0.000039133713,0.9966598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002272026,0.0034615188,0.000011897884,0.0004682097,0.00030950122,0.0000033907695,0.00009012083,0.000011736837,0.9933716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998695,0.00026125243,0.0002020952,0.00026259018,0.00036142283,0.00021761082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998652,0.00019667648,0.00037016138,0.00041518704,0.0002713255,0.00009467205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034554987,0.00015581484,0.00034771528,0.000020173451,0.000977598,0.000056647452,0.0006192715,0.00015648198,0.000014552988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018659575,0.00015034935,0.0002333906,0.000052439143,0.0010189088,0.000087698754,0.0002604393,0.0004512759,0.000004821289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097652,0.000012739611,6.252023e-7,0.00038137808,0.00004505921,0.000011777482,0.00041590392,1.00650674e-7,0.0000034528548,0.882828,0.11572964,0.00056153734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009216977,0.00001082825,0.00001103496,0.0014502766,0.00015148045,8.2132823e-7,0.00072760537,6.375222e-7,0.00013037265,0.000028475173,0.9972497,0.00014659474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044038794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005314681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88279957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003093962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084559707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75189924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252001026","doi":"10.22215/etd/2001-04788","title":"Images of old age in Canadian law; revisiting McKinney","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02023113849261906,"score_gpt":0.34222795945868834,"score_spread":0.3219968209660693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252001026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033876393,0.000097073214,0.000001305528,0.0006587294,0.000064318105,0.00021680303,0.000020728885,0.000017590428,0.96504706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419283,0.00020473356,0.00014223496,0.00016417197,0.00016588159,0.000019319441,0.00021565282,0.000010529241,0.15714917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912244,0.00004096152,0.00023012872,0.00016157869,0.00016167927,0.000283219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951077,0.000043294353,0.000101910686,0.00013148529,0.0000710012,0.00014151605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037457902,0.000081550446,0.00016112579,0.00010640351,0.0002137457,0.000056529752,0.00022763165,0.00015662373,0.0005608133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085363776,0.000085131185,0.000052260217,0.00031500793,0.00004763813,0.00007999592,0.00000630469,0.00015543932,0.00002781475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010735065,0.000008443725,0.00095657626,0.000037412257,0.000004143004,0.00001189635,0.003971215,0.0000023165098,0.00008154598,0.9904228,0.00089642336,0.0036061516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080664286,0.0000042384772,0.009574126,0.00018586019,0.000014092479,1.4215476e-7,0.012877985,0.0000034464272,0.0003287275,0.004335117,0.9723686,0.00022699023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98667073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016009975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046706945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6140512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252033499","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-95810-8_380","title":"The Cross Trust","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Chiang Ching-Kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange; Camargo Foundation; British Academy; Government of Canada; Ciência sem Fronteiras; Australian Government; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03135097480793132,"score_gpt":0.30978281930334756,"score_spread":0.27843184449541625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252033499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012625937,0.0004732517,0.000025222987,0.00040867014,0.00046752993,0.0005488299,0.00010105859,0.00011887257,0.9977303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6842174,0.00022859876,0.000040011855,0.00014028524,0.001647582,0.000038935348,0.000010874157,0.00004238154,0.31363392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982219,0.00003890181,0.00034470388,0.00040755613,0.00048985897,0.00049712486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839854,0.0002031142,0.00024637888,0.0007237175,0.00022000501,0.0002082123],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005785307,0.00028188192,0.00023435181,0.000042516305,0.0023966553,0.00042724956,0.0009100909,0.0003536166,0.0016460924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056706056,0.0002076736,0.00024612964,0.00001816273,0.001763139,5.272325e-7,0.00020010625,0.00031386205,0.0016416943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004671658,9.3211526e-8,0.000044728902,0.000004087258,0.000035104244,0.000002747416,0.0013175517,5.8423566e-8,0.0000033037477,0.9917335,0.00035236275,0.0065017976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053402513,0.0000106646785,0.000076802666,0.000012994866,0.000016134676,7.3116684e-7,0.00008261708,0.0000013765685,0.000008740017,0.52701414,0.47256014,0.00016224035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004629914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031977585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6840964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119917604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025294762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252090369","doi":"10.4337/9781849807975.00009","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law reform; Civil society; Law; Foundation (evidence); Public administration; Social capital; Competition (biology); Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.02302034300510894,"score_gpt":0.2661357432871959,"score_spread":0.24311540028208697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252090369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024510235,0.000045625842,0.00012720986,0.019935176,0.00238862,0.00035771696,0.000032020696,0.00037747866,0.97671163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002081927,0.000025660422,0.0009357474,0.00045668153,0.01958522,0.000029178413,0.00007897922,0.00006843104,0.97673815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980703,0.000033733802,0.00031344136,0.00052568654,0.00067563896,0.00038122412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984927,0.00007958875,0.00027267798,0.0006086811,0.0003013041,0.00024501048],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010949003,0.00023977032,0.00025154426,0.0001511771,0.0009911502,0.00213485,0.00078793406,0.0008951101,0.002040822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039462687,0.00025171338,0.00017878566,0.000028738314,0.00039958497,0.00064884865,0.00017553638,0.0017194933,0.0006106368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020399698,0.000004240151,0.0000012753784,0.000006312159,0.000018654371,0.0000014743432,0.0011589141,1.8847707e-7,0.000054012493,0.8604766,0.1178776,0.020398675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005915729,0.0000070956385,0.000005553295,0.00001668868,0.000028053424,0.0000015747657,0.000064866,6.4460943e-7,0.00004236867,0.0913648,0.90814817,0.00026102175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010930207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039886264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79027057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018739783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052903057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252188276","doi":"10.1017/9781316459423.023","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252188276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033347285,0.00006329861,0.00078562077,0.0001112015,0.0008104081,0.0003757862,0.00036771156,0.00008237588,0.99707013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008933154,0.00019274896,0.000039696635,0.000098872704,0.0011568725,0.000002104379,0.00005973012,0.000018485376,0.9894983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00014494616,0.00010834862,0.00037414295,0.00028695448,0.000360626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.000051242267,0.00014685592,0.00040633522,0.00019834762,0.00021557152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857286,0.00017359815,0.00021110065,0.0000863407,0.00095847005,0.00011146012,0.0008660532,0.00039935156,0.0001276099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152395705,0.00020973122,0.0001317593,0.000045465393,0.00064752385,0.000087858054,0.0003040098,0.00033021744,0.0016100289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272979,0.000008916045,0.000001841033,0.0000125013985,0.000022840626,0.0000047836447,0.00024107621,7.516388e-7,0.0000039424745,0.29569677,0.70378184,0.00021645456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015847865,0.00001000528,0.000018129129,0.000029625562,0.000038599803,3.7792682e-7,0.00041646563,0.000010707584,0.000051044135,9.660291e-7,0.9990204,0.00024522492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011503459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29569578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026606026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050177996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252444009","doi":"10.1017/9781108348683.009","title":"Unjust Enrichment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Unjust enrichment; Computer science; Business; Political science; Restitution; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.03265397785757,"score_gpt":0.2437789835761326,"score_spread":0.21112500571856258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252444009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030066893,0.00006729447,0.0001551953,0.00014348477,0.00022733133,0.00055472384,0.00018982947,0.00012713397,0.99850494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028038716,0.0002134326,0.000051842493,0.000102135054,0.0002526873,6.708449e-7,0.000029099392,0.00002283914,0.99652344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988864,0.00003187723,0.000117193966,0.00037032992,0.00033058954,0.00026360262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904865,0.000059358834,0.00015327153,0.00043665082,0.00012320951,0.0001788701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012465741,0.00019285498,0.00022162338,0.000075334,0.00048463582,0.000061932486,0.0005824257,0.00030228862,0.00003639045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000057139932,0.00023363484,0.00016957676,0.000008105947,0.0002883614,0.00009177439,0.0002630564,0.00031843988,0.00023111588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007801952,0.0000059026256,0.0000014777739,0.000015981695,0.000038682054,0.00001635796,0.00018465846,8.976366e-7,0.000005669049,0.9557021,0.043180685,0.0008397493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017005562,0.000012521933,0.000008564468,0.000036423076,0.000092564514,4.682587e-7,0.00017035862,0.000004124027,0.00001169015,0.000031376174,0.9991926,0.00026926395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016224083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047977366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9560119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037522742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039028408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95273525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252619127","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.265","title":"LORD WRIGHT AND INNOVATIVE TRADITIONALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Law; Restitution; Tort; Duty; Law and economics; Statutory law; Sociology; Appeal; Political science; Liability; Economics; History","score_opus":0.014778380003170836,"score_gpt":0.25242463714073543,"score_spread":0.2376462571375646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252619127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055314805,0.00027544677,0.0009428134,0.007595528,0.000052386935,0.00006578857,0.000015403453,0.000014184371,0.93572366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973993,0.00027700668,0.0012091618,0.00013775911,0.0000999464,9.212807e-9,0.0000010972711,7.8308744e-7,0.000874967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996665,0.000030322411,0.000050919803,0.00004947737,0.00012605873,0.000076693585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996835,0.00001764652,0.000064453714,0.000032846103,0.00012712786,0.00007441267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014100652,0.000028877435,0.00005498191,0.0000074790587,0.0008156672,0.000021383166,0.000112163754,0.000028672965,0.00076316035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005111807,0.00003053436,0.000022997676,0.00003407407,0.000190256,0.00039873598,0.000008379073,0.00006225647,0.0000027574376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071182694,0.000028409635,0.00004178262,4.209575e-7,0.0000070979813,0.0000034782915,0.0073314467,7.754659e-7,0.00006521014,0.98627335,0.0021369085,0.0041040075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030585873,0.00004052885,0.012504606,0.000009619605,0.000010008384,0.000006517699,0.010484587,0.0000063014886,0.000018107454,0.020496963,0.9560497,0.00006720724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018886982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027882524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9657764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110620094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051550676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98985606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252953423","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511626746.045","title":"Chapter 3","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Infatuation; Hatred; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Philosophy; History; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.03545839744086389,"score_gpt":0.24080143182991326,"score_spread":0.20534303438904938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252953423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019587456,0.00006553367,0.00008791002,0.00027733544,0.00009621629,0.00035333226,0.00011909442,0.00017053759,0.99881047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027417575,0.00024734673,0.000069315465,0.00017453001,0.0003160277,4.1614697e-7,0.000016182012,0.000020118192,0.9964143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989643,0.000020286197,0.00011740012,0.00035064644,0.00028856227,0.00025880666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991183,0.000033743934,0.00013784856,0.00037376164,0.00012458365,0.00021171273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010887033,0.00019969382,0.00021292061,0.00008142635,0.00062689965,0.00006253781,0.0005398486,0.00031058057,0.000035574492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005845438,0.00024490702,0.00018297709,0.000005952398,0.0003593725,0.00008188875,0.00014459225,0.00032565094,0.00009293552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000808819,0.000004441972,3.1443577e-7,0.000004767844,0.000022931434,0.00003467918,0.00016394416,3.3270632e-7,0.0000051066213,0.980757,0.012227818,0.006770601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013327051,0.000013589104,0.000008841769,0.00003414612,0.000071007256,9.302406e-7,0.00006072972,0.0000028606794,0.000014943244,0.00015836571,0.9992244,0.00027691183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010032931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000540015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017793765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012482518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252982815","doi":"10.1017/9781316227183.014","title":"Index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03150403076280168,"score_gpt":0.27304828189909475,"score_spread":0.24154425113629308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252982815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033347285,0.00006329861,0.00078562077,0.0001112015,0.0008104081,0.0003757862,0.00036771156,0.00008237588,0.99707013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008933154,0.00019274896,0.000039696635,0.000098872704,0.0011568725,0.000002104379,0.00005973012,0.000018485376,0.9894983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.00014494616,0.00010834862,0.00037414295,0.00028695448,0.000360626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898165,0.000051242267,0.00014685592,0.00040633522,0.00019834762,0.00021557152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014857286,0.00017359815,0.00021110065,0.0000863407,0.00095847005,0.00011146012,0.0008660532,0.00039935156,0.0001276099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000152395705,0.00020973122,0.0001317593,0.000045465393,0.00064752385,0.000087858054,0.0003040098,0.00033021744,0.0016100289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272979,0.000008916045,0.000001841033,0.0000125013985,0.000022840626,0.0000047836447,0.00024107621,7.516388e-7,0.0000039424745,0.29569677,0.70378184,0.00021645456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015847865,0.00001000528,0.000018129129,0.000029625562,0.000038599803,3.7792682e-7,0.00041646563,0.000010707584,0.000051044135,9.660291e-7,0.9990204,0.00024522492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011503459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29569578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026606026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050177996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253016386","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2008.19869","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.3816856800491292,"score_gpt":0.363145421978042,"score_spread":0.018540258071087168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253016386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42021453,0.0006668804,0.00082226656,0.07737128,0.00031590147,0.00031379928,0.0000034325797,0.00024222987,0.50004965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941218,0.000029496861,0.00045975833,0.00037180202,0.00018769247,0.000005167406,0.0000011402003,0.000004925193,0.0048182216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994548,0.00003838526,0.00005598796,0.000111496985,0.00014601165,0.00019330476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997708,0.00002974654,0.000018932575,0.000074728974,0.00001775413,0.00008802492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001300153,0.000041125393,0.000049442697,0.00002094691,0.00064655056,0.00002473565,0.00007431515,0.00004413736,0.000037804595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003199588,0.000041987438,0.000017957169,0.00010034999,0.00045776917,0.00008618124,0.000004238981,0.00007015899,0.000053702533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021135975,0.0003205216,0.015667442,0.000023417575,0.000022199452,0.0000124184335,0.28181207,0.000005186217,0.00053797395,0.564273,0.030282969,0.10702165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008216688,0.00007832442,0.10506337,0.00016495008,0.00003536672,0.000029367926,0.08518758,0.00009507539,0.00045781693,0.018701589,0.78884673,0.00051818206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022694936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003617338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75856376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059303755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062812745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49728096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253339146","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.179","title":"ERNIE'S THREE WORLDS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035658198521737815,"score_gpt":0.24481946985963499,"score_spread":0.20916127133789716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253339146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01863964,0.00013995914,0.0015058166,0.00039645442,0.00008683474,0.000043255623,0.0000031717314,0.00001589008,0.97916895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99400306,0.00016019875,0.002984895,0.000028046099,0.00009602806,1.8462936e-8,2.1710703e-7,0.0000020645007,0.0027254515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959326,0.000030995772,0.00005545966,0.000054685814,0.00014696996,0.000118656244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996297,0.000011409661,0.00007966481,0.00007722962,0.00008412681,0.00011786572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020050012,0.000032502285,0.000060693677,0.0000063438624,0.00086849293,0.0000136533745,0.00031187435,0.00003493187,0.0054911915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004898101,0.000035206285,0.00006538049,0.000020526024,0.00021170905,0.00036434754,0.000038615017,0.00007275022,0.000024761352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016355816,0.000050557926,0.0023674236,0.0000010269875,0.000019166218,0.000007772847,0.015298426,8.134782e-7,0.000021205151,0.97650725,0.0012571557,0.004452842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020289094,0.000026511927,0.015406624,0.000008303137,0.000021283666,0.0000025256381,0.011140871,0.000005756798,0.00001632476,0.005542297,0.96755755,0.00006907517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2977756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7502186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014038943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059346905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99541795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253351290","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0000","title":"The judicial invention of property norms: Ellickson’s whalemen revisited","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014654528245273529,"score_gpt":0.24124766129125105,"score_spread":0.22659313304597753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253351290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0699192,0.0006119946,0.00049860764,0.00796278,0.0001487031,0.0005012328,0.000010196305,0.000020990128,0.9203263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942405,0.001214943,0.00036272383,0.000027862896,0.00012816765,1.5652975e-7,9.4410456e-7,0.0000021689768,0.004022529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993944,0.0000924498,0.00012037424,0.00005475223,0.00021792462,0.00012009877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993386,0.000028913204,0.0001988065,0.000089660054,0.00026773667,0.00007623343],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003984283,0.0000357827,0.000078688936,0.0000061860164,0.0012765422,0.00003979714,0.00031727616,0.000035386583,0.0012200711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020058565,0.0000239649,0.00007794541,0.000033300454,0.0002813783,0.0004844424,0.000044586093,0.00007357448,0.0000146940765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054648946,0.00015960612,0.0023937214,0.000017762883,0.00011100186,0.0000019004831,0.019566258,0.000009640626,0.0013790036,0.90074867,0.03335968,0.042198084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022617671,0.000042010848,0.003936682,0.000028652823,0.000023971648,9.256394e-7,0.017419586,0.000041125615,0.00003338557,0.0030309695,0.9751629,0.00005361565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29076323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2278789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016120091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073514995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253863679","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016.0001","title":"Decomposing <i>Bhasin v Hrynew</i>  : Towards an institutional understanding of the general organizing principle of good faith in contractual performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Supreme court; Faith; Political science; Common law; Fair dealing; Subject (documents); Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Good faith; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04354523155426537,"score_gpt":0.2984003652038038,"score_spread":0.25485513364953843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253863679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.924033,0.00003268065,0.0008522515,0.0003499507,0.00009683834,0.00007432887,0.000010530444,0.0000032116538,0.074547194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844354,0.00008182546,0.0013189735,0.000009554907,0.00006122074,2.436698e-8,5.136679e-7,0.0000023560945,0.000081983664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993208,0.000062707724,0.00014799603,0.00007453734,0.0002625763,0.00013135067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992916,0.000018363098,0.00036639135,0.00015153289,0.00010674196,0.00006538419],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044963002,0.000049867314,0.00012522364,0.000012804525,0.0020283759,0.000040436218,0.0005893134,0.000048413,0.00008572099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027308597,0.000045661352,0.000056619167,0.000027014261,0.00060467975,0.00096729334,0.00010742267,0.000116913834,1.8578251e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048774073,0.00012585093,0.04862637,0.000012102362,0.00002592894,0.0000023582247,0.010941683,0.00047437273,0.0032459688,0.9355513,0.000009199901,0.00093609636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032997732,0.00019556924,0.88700753,0.00041351863,0.00009682402,0.00002536844,0.04165563,0.002111877,0.0045837923,0.0028255451,0.057422023,0.00036254406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06913392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22077776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9327257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056063954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037594695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254127594","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748697748.003.0009","title":"Trusting Patrimonies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Appropriation; Civil code; Property (philosophy); Normative; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08104705175859414,"score_gpt":0.2766751140791666,"score_spread":0.19562806232057248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254127594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024511019,0.00013868388,0.000068557674,0.00015335935,0.00030127805,0.00030166743,0.00008348055,0.00020143944,0.998727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031229989,0.00011948534,0.0001341809,0.000021913698,0.0009799269,7.7081523e-7,0.000012464931,0.00001875233,0.9955895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987958,0.000025201009,0.00013124512,0.000317692,0.00045864706,0.00027142954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989457,0.000088327484,0.00018822512,0.0002866983,0.00024111854,0.000249943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029438108,0.00018836929,0.00022688408,0.000085951564,0.0007255038,0.000074304095,0.00055737764,0.00035828687,0.00026495787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003121325,0.00022372499,0.00013674123,0.000010764695,0.0004031861,0.00010626466,0.00027846466,0.00037507614,0.000013793194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009292845,0.0000039191755,0.0000020794282,0.000004293014,0.000030742896,0.000020661088,0.0023430218,0.0000037005884,0.0000014325343,0.9278256,0.0662152,0.0035400202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015766348,0.000011423065,6.6376424e-7,0.000039404284,0.00009050952,4.2968568e-7,0.00078704156,0.0000065105264,0.00000389511,0.006397646,0.992251,0.00025382655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039331475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032500812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92603576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003101616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041040333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.912324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254262758","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u225572","title":"Frankland, His Honour Judge Cecil J., (21 Oct. 1884–18 June 1942), Judge of County Circuit No. 13, 1933–36, No. 12 (Bradford, Halifax), since 1936","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.0412568831419577,"score_gpt":0.2953110595950058,"score_spread":0.2540541764530481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254262758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015299221,0.007516051,0.00043225236,0.0020273782,0.0049021305,0.0016532519,0.0059970724,0.00029575848,0.9756462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023271445,0.07905075,0.0004125972,0.0015999852,0.009353507,0.00022704604,0.0020129948,0.00024575263,0.8838259],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220526,0.00032350578,0.0016311031,0.0015347687,0.0024790587,0.0018262789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422276,0.0006494237,0.0013243491,0.0016712777,0.0013333773,0.00079883105],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017378248,0.0010162875,0.0018614231,0.0003904986,0.0014314473,0.00041017652,0.002432378,0.0017524407,0.0020492964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006647536,0.0009957539,0.00076541223,0.0011057642,0.0011731304,0.000490267,0.0004538807,0.0017537918,0.0025165244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006655513,0.00036875097,0.00094108016,0.0004496924,0.00020406458,0.000027846962,0.0023692066,0.000006861637,0.00001397418,0.018210161,0.96469617,0.012645614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008442102,0.00008551984,0.0014349007,0.00070800405,0.00021719204,0.0000044524563,0.0002885403,0.000031456282,0.00003038232,0.0010857176,0.9941293,0.0011403247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026837366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02822813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091820255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009057614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024201612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254449087","doi":"10.4324/9780203079300-17","title":"Ontario, Canada and the principle of choice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Geography; History","score_opus":0.02376932797778965,"score_gpt":0.2648053988632602,"score_spread":0.24103607088547055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254449087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006280372,0.00024851214,0.000006041832,0.0012580266,0.00006448107,0.00024021626,0.0000122494575,0.000006202626,0.99753624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.083781116,0.00009864736,0.000038883987,0.00021519804,0.00015962233,0.000006874449,0.0000029465764,0.0000055026467,0.9156912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999422,0.000010185861,0.00013242608,0.00009067569,0.00022917129,0.000115514726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994449,0.00015941651,0.00010535563,0.00017027979,0.000047691094,0.00007234859],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022319064,0.000072116,0.00013582461,0.000007809794,0.00021779744,0.000015689575,0.00017786221,0.00007589119,0.0030790307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017841961,0.00004597228,0.000034790788,0.000009877534,0.00030918545,0.00003080455,0.00007095237,0.00014073489,0.000008208769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012453438,0.0000014819856,0.0003087862,0.0000028840634,0.000012155374,5.6995404e-8,0.0005851781,9.940215e-8,1.5792342e-7,0.99718195,0.0012864162,0.0006195575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008549178,0.0000012272865,0.0009221158,0.000005550011,0.000023730223,1.3556988e-7,0.000027635522,3.780969e-7,0.0000011084795,0.005748268,0.9931224,0.00006193945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015808514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011966722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254588569","doi":"10.1093/tandt/12.1.29","title":"Book Reviews","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.03323920894731765,"score_gpt":0.34984069891739106,"score_spread":0.3166014899700734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254588569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010712798,0.040102113,0.00013805713,0.04166835,0.00019922658,0.0008867233,0.000008725029,0.0003241921,0.9059598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6156371,0.023000734,0.0042854073,0.018305741,0.0037326359,0.00026081118,0.000009893195,0.000037875347,0.33472982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990666,0.000082995546,0.00021021652,0.00017700299,0.00019057971,0.00027261628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949265,0.000042944,0.000070089955,0.00023567698,0.000029947301,0.0001286748],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040121167,0.00008628748,0.00014271648,0.000029257657,0.0004478778,0.000072341485,0.0002848436,0.00006324484,0.0050963275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070408736,0.00007494658,0.000083319916,0.00013395923,0.00013012666,0.0002898532,0.000034111286,0.000101708334,0.0025795877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004918553,0.000099011326,0.00046334945,0.000012914636,0.000009728336,0.0000010341478,0.011651174,0.000012163735,0.00007344528,0.2976694,0.4380337,0.25196916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092012226,0.000005774981,0.0005994574,0.000009673643,0.000009707698,4.4701775e-7,0.00022147015,0.000018243496,0.00005095412,0.00036962805,0.99851865,0.00010396242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003443758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010968598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6049243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000776353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006929738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254595801","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511800146.005","title":"Insurance benefits","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Content (measure theory); Business; Computer science; Actuarial science; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.034615442473877565,"score_gpt":0.23582001790012597,"score_spread":0.2012045754262484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254595801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014044221,0.00019457824,0.00002894072,0.00016833776,0.00009810959,0.00034594355,0.00031558156,0.00016634892,0.9985417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007413573,0.0005156062,0.00005697786,0.00012997047,0.00027529063,5.300244e-7,0.000020060465,0.00001803617,0.99156994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989598,0.000026249865,0.00011731448,0.00034524588,0.00029378993,0.00025763336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999113,0.0000423465,0.00014815226,0.0003588217,0.00014609499,0.00019153915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010174898,0.00019100553,0.00021555931,0.000069856185,0.0006581352,0.00006110862,0.0005846165,0.0003173001,0.000008963697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008372652,0.0002409229,0.00015395872,0.000010205008,0.00029590225,0.00009068176,0.00012520679,0.00032350892,0.000050024497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008531012,0.0000056883605,0.000002243451,0.0000065340673,0.000018562281,0.000018629311,0.00013726365,0.0000023884716,0.0000022704376,0.97320205,0.01404395,0.012551863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014596155,0.0000117254995,0.0001155998,0.00005735773,0.000040702682,7.538335e-7,0.000038787297,0.0000018681523,0.000014651121,0.00006794235,0.9992349,0.00026972147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011172617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008709472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020124717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018706423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98245513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254882750","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u236210","title":"Croom-Johnson, Hon. Sir Reginald Powell, (died 29 Dec. 1957), Judge High Court of Justice, King’s Bench Division, 1938–54; JP Somerset and Deputy Chairman Quarter Sessions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Law; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02599109694133219,"score_gpt":0.31742551925706136,"score_spread":0.2914344223157292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254882750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09908112,0.015889829,0.0017932091,0.019200968,0.004160712,0.0038898909,0.0034284268,0.0005914619,0.85196435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7294279,0.1193196,0.0008451213,0.0015172474,0.0036353017,0.00018188446,0.0017407088,0.00020460635,0.14312765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525285,0.00024034457,0.00094684825,0.0010835237,0.0013639246,0.0011125018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652034,0.00050359184,0.0008576683,0.0009922341,0.00045271247,0.0006734341],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088811567,0.0006500323,0.0011447017,0.00041042618,0.0016675206,0.00028219726,0.0010473423,0.0010626017,0.00044009875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017998021,0.0005817564,0.0002823727,0.0008423861,0.00074919086,0.0003591401,0.00040083108,0.0010087964,0.000074810974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000429078,0.00027393212,0.0020475383,0.00054825016,0.00013307296,0.000021776017,0.004497636,0.000010097308,0.0000073991628,0.036512703,0.9479151,0.007989633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067776564,0.000095680756,0.02267923,0.0008579226,0.0003713274,0.0000037250811,0.0015547713,0.000040709456,0.000019693729,0.0012133406,0.9717684,0.00071744464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101629365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014826111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70883673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026857582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007212585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254956224","doi":"10.5040/9781472566355.ch-003","title":"Mens Rea in the Common Law of England and Wales, Australia and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Law; Geography; History; Criminology; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; Criminal law","score_opus":0.045520666007776475,"score_gpt":0.2709109017945932,"score_spread":0.22539023578681672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254956224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01445877,0.00004925632,0.0000011110668,0.0031244447,0.00006686346,0.00025700647,0.000090453614,0.000011516918,0.98194057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8400663,0.000012199072,0.000022110118,0.00043992247,0.00017688649,0.000009781875,0.00002067736,0.000009839367,0.15924227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990746,0.000060859118,0.0002046623,0.00018239967,0.00031211905,0.00016535773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992895,0.00023115732,0.00013515481,0.00021352361,0.000049821458,0.00008082095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087634096,0.00011158275,0.00019313101,0.000029652874,0.00026918438,0.00052578375,0.00030002557,0.00016479258,0.00002207213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037801736,0.000086699314,0.000020930811,0.000010000463,0.0003195826,0.00012629814,0.00007944222,0.00035766186,6.0042794e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001322429,0.0000014148542,0.00018763696,0.000016821718,0.000006163017,0.0000023107568,0.0024416714,9.06975e-8,0.0000034102213,0.9863977,0.010017449,0.0009240486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107960805,0.0000068336735,0.00035473335,0.000049976607,0.000014617296,0.0000015752156,0.00017388724,0.0000011357791,0.0000033486488,0.017789736,0.98139685,0.000099319055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.923874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051635303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018696593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5070145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255372687","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2009.21148","title":"Awards and Appointments","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.263302178068504,"score_gpt":0.3747734113707417,"score_spread":0.11147123330223774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255372687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09787249,0.00060090196,0.0009400819,0.25696382,0.00022235273,0.00030619054,0.0000023082252,0.00023971758,0.6428521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995838,0.000010216612,0.00046804664,0.0010417604,0.0001867128,0.0000018881474,0.0000010650863,0.0000027622073,0.002449534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947846,0.000033747572,0.000054514207,0.000109089524,0.00012909823,0.00019507506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999789,0.000020094647,0.000018468778,0.000072961004,0.000015050678,0.00008440302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017018896,0.00004092182,0.00004711988,0.000020659507,0.0003453493,0.00006307694,0.00007575626,0.000044004042,0.000026107396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002847288,0.000041445415,0.000016850914,0.00009855417,0.00016496284,0.00008813348,0.0000019330876,0.00006780197,0.000031819447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070978804,0.00011356521,0.0004985787,0.000003912756,0.0000037553518,0.0000010931336,0.038955543,0.0000015287573,0.00035700784,0.62448186,0.0055012563,0.33007482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008635979,0.00019470936,0.11234015,0.00026966186,0.000053908338,0.0000057631983,0.08991564,0.00012956584,0.0005443111,0.16844496,0.6266514,0.0005863455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070714734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020496527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89796555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005796987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036693113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26561826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255382887","doi":"10.29173/alr117","title":"Overlapping Remedies and the Unexpected Termination of Oil and Gas Leases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Lease; Freehold; Unjust enrichment; Law; Tort; Interpretation (philosophy); Common law; Economics; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Liability","score_opus":0.03898283919559765,"score_gpt":0.2984717149189567,"score_spread":0.25948887572335905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255382887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04444277,0.109655276,0.0000039626684,0.023108227,0.000047785285,0.00035701395,0.000002737915,0.000020246762,0.822362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7664221,0.23104045,0.0000780347,0.000695344,0.00003209521,0.000039588478,0.000001462706,0.0000033178076,0.0016876266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955213,0.00008719168,0.00013313904,0.00008163878,0.00007826875,0.00006764484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949634,0.00024852905,0.000085348984,0.00010139397,0.00004056279,0.000027809217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002822796,0.000041279316,0.00013082183,0.0000053022873,0.00020858087,0.000012522806,0.000075268006,0.000016854774,0.000051287316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027358477,0.000025871637,0.000025140263,0.00008898321,0.00046857027,0.00008955325,0.00003269968,0.000029537945,0.0000032879802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017410617,0.000007943051,0.00013437592,0.000207851,0.00000665013,7.026545e-8,0.0028573812,2.7090026e-9,0.000016083339,0.9695537,0.000117208416,0.027096976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019960651,0.000009121823,0.0013034476,0.0010534796,0.00009472931,0.0000016972797,0.00038664503,0.0000066112148,0.000039723054,0.0049946825,0.9918307,0.000079539466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032826014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016655413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9917135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004729489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015149672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97361445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255401799","doi":"10.1017/9781108332835.015","title":"Index","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03534017225878285,"score_gpt":0.26558892029203235,"score_spread":0.2302487480332495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255401799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007698098,0.000083569576,0.0010063159,0.0004925644,0.0004944585,0.0003941931,0.00044715183,0.00009897948,0.9969058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012180517,0.0002634455,0.000035011988,0.00023189824,0.00073735364,0.0000020641578,0.00007705323,0.000018842973,0.98645383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987829,0.00014071225,0.00010744142,0.00037874165,0.0002848188,0.00030538556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913245,0.000052577452,0.00013384158,0.00028718336,0.000106624815,0.00028734287],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008084186,0.00017161931,0.00023389824,0.000057404573,0.000702739,0.00010545207,0.0008174936,0.00032704082,0.000063428866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001773028,0.00021369956,0.0001453367,0.0000517212,0.00032404784,0.00007745497,0.00031303288,0.00045968848,0.0011162052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008738844,0.00000638139,0.0000013700575,0.00001804786,0.000023335726,0.000011332687,0.0002947511,0.0000028031404,0.000006018434,0.367013,0.6323465,0.00026769933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016486332,0.00000774598,0.000012238045,0.000021075195,0.00004164312,2.7199468e-7,0.0005547803,0.000022288,0.000037632653,6.2646865e-7,0.99889785,0.00023899585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008660263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046103647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36701238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021755885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005179117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255917115","doi":"10.1017/s0008197308000044","title":"Sham Trusts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Lease; Database transaction; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Statutory law; Law; Payment; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04437690517440169,"score_gpt":0.3045272433894376,"score_spread":0.2601503382150359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255917115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22713941,0.00019877689,0.00022344706,0.021536117,0.00026142562,0.00010356376,0.000004614061,0.000041355677,0.75049126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914916,0.00021759162,0.000085469466,0.0010420886,0.0012590243,0.000003940506,4.221059e-7,0.000005834437,0.0058940025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992137,0.00009955524,0.0001260827,0.00006457343,0.0002708225,0.00022529525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995494,0.00005793858,0.00006679916,0.00013362952,0.000062022504,0.00013024281],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000537646,0.00004947917,0.000064772095,0.000010507811,0.0037149778,0.00008701621,0.0003690786,0.000030844094,0.00013178612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025508345,0.00003201814,0.00007230224,0.00012258608,0.00039629635,0.00014589632,0.00003089069,0.00025169953,0.00021249244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003767087,0.000019586692,0.00020536773,4.1455354e-7,0.000008075815,0.00001539189,0.0022229704,0.000006783989,0.000049837305,0.9671909,0.029187448,0.0010894412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011694942,0.000008551197,0.0029954775,0.000003344512,0.000006876013,0.00018815769,0.0008190302,0.000014452848,0.00006901681,0.001028106,0.99468905,0.000061003957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020724013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008052013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005579898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103077364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256174237","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.643","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF CONTRACT REMEDIES (AND WHY DO CONTRACTS PROFESSORS TEACH REMEDIES FIRST?)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Compensation (psychology); Incentive; Normative; Breach of contract; Contract theory; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01139003454695533,"score_gpt":0.2541324606851664,"score_spread":0.24274242613821104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256174237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7240837,0.0028823267,0.00027538277,0.017099043,0.0007537239,0.00039357337,0.000014916332,0.000028846966,0.25446847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751294,0.0012438446,0.00031906005,0.000013702787,0.00014376492,1.2003709e-7,2.5523266e-7,0.0000022245881,0.0007640622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993113,0.00007672284,0.00012698102,0.00007391639,0.0002568583,0.00015420809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990473,0.00022268113,0.00024914547,0.00010302698,0.0002780188,0.00009984375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086898176,0.000051418036,0.00011317593,0.000009027413,0.0022716739,0.000036421025,0.00027446586,0.00007299485,0.00013921618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017175141,0.000041286425,0.00005735557,0.000021972359,0.00094131986,0.00040161255,0.000045623667,0.00021992323,0.0000010006388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083648534,0.00007010851,0.0060367496,0.000008492857,0.0000650007,0.0000024864557,0.026932003,0.0000024234257,0.0017479762,0.9593296,0.002748925,0.0029726066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004601199,0.00004240468,0.026733415,0.000034592893,0.000045964094,0.0000040904342,0.061610818,0.000021811773,0.00006663746,0.0030594897,0.9078446,0.00007605086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16055721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7627324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015345034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011117367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256221483","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139005302","title":"Principle and Policy in Contract Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Appeal; Formalism (music); Interdependence; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.032180096178701594,"score_gpt":0.26779979572014484,"score_spread":0.23561969954144324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256221483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049797865,0.000078648955,0.000016758406,0.00008047663,0.000044817712,0.00048454112,0.00014307612,0.0000707996,0.9985829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022553114,0.00018682546,0.00003451619,0.00013617083,0.00021582142,0.0000019788379,0.0000151307595,0.000016148797,0.9768403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899715,0.00008450145,0.00012702664,0.0003214264,0.00016643788,0.00030346526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928015,0.00007235904,0.00012351018,0.00026726956,0.000059425976,0.00019726019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018276677,0.00016250306,0.00023655687,0.000115442694,0.00038662608,0.000055591696,0.0004092349,0.00031156893,0.0000042669917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018363267,0.00019864169,0.000069838374,0.000021988231,0.000637035,0.000114085575,0.0002527205,0.00034923156,0.000009666626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132193,0.00001297332,0.000013959988,0.000019471887,0.000015016491,0.000031025633,0.0007673342,1.5046501e-7,0.000003449268,0.9948249,0.0038920965,0.00040641494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002893491,0.000009757219,0.00022138753,0.000043160075,0.000029445908,9.99841e-7,0.00008539501,0.0000038798494,0.000013744903,0.0001448554,0.99895173,0.00020630339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0483245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026100064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043517747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007160113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9580128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256344364","doi":"10.1017/9781139013826.020","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256344364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024993552,0.00009216014,0.0007617439,0.000121078076,0.0010742764,0.00052258326,0.00039964163,0.000068098954,0.9967105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016823798,0.00023037005,0.000019908555,0.000102615806,0.0004816992,0.0000017692024,0.0000725004,0.000019033556,0.9822483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874145,0.00013752861,0.00010559282,0.00037223706,0.00029489337,0.00034828298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.00006893886,0.00014846036,0.0004343169,0.00013297697,0.0001737184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012737447,0.0001739766,0.00023954261,0.00008710378,0.0005774884,0.00010308849,0.00082794135,0.0004025431,0.00008085685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010849748,0.0002112687,0.00014829778,0.000040509865,0.0002851073,0.000091724985,0.00028449946,0.00041884778,0.0024215307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007589759,0.000008544991,0.000003831911,0.000021782593,0.000023286479,0.0000038784656,0.00018192975,0.000008983049,0.000005154923,0.3882697,0.6112349,0.00023041076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955167,0.0000070813667,0.000024606443,0.00003144459,0.000031978958,2.8661168e-7,0.00047870295,0.000018955674,0.000027432096,4.5485612e-7,0.998931,0.00025256057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012339986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053883246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38826922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028266988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005811423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256381139","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttn135","title":"Offshore: Guernsey","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Law; Ecological succession; Position (finance); Population; Law enforcement; Subject (documents); Geography; History; Political science; Sociology; Business; Ecology; Library science; Computer science; Advertising; Demography","score_opus":0.024099825527013136,"score_gpt":0.3377841127325339,"score_spread":0.3136842872055208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256381139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22521167,0.00021161464,0.00013540307,0.018992351,0.00017525673,0.00031248064,0.000009290415,0.0003242673,0.75462765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98287594,0.00008061148,0.0005253884,0.00089111686,0.00046717736,0.000011472825,0.0000042064867,0.0000068714266,0.015137216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989806,0.000053357882,0.00015889875,0.00019921373,0.00028583015,0.0003221166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946773,0.000044791246,0.000051203206,0.00023774989,0.00005034338,0.00014819011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000257231,0.000092998336,0.000119052995,0.000038468697,0.00049235055,0.0001026815,0.00032989678,0.000083031926,0.00064720237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006151253,0.000085836,0.00007017743,0.00020418703,0.00012303171,0.00017754374,0.000020175436,0.00011295556,0.00040326448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008370236,0.00009463954,0.0017403538,0.0000022614092,0.0000071462177,0.000003587266,0.005670006,0.000010981401,0.0001726091,0.9086382,0.0129066575,0.07074523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001739369,0.00003152906,0.039322358,0.0000070861743,0.000013030854,9.95447e-7,0.0011874202,0.00002942372,0.00018640328,0.017304583,0.941577,0.00016624335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061065966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005523087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92867035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060220606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009714961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7086412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256565409","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u213600","title":"Marler, William de Montmollin, (10 Nov. 1849–1929), Notary; Emeritus Professor of Civil Law, McGill University, Montreal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.029452409224665486,"score_gpt":0.2947746859479036,"score_spread":0.26532227672323816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256565409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002812398,0.0014088411,0.00008389947,0.0018635466,0.00045639073,0.0008800677,0.002475802,0.00014224283,0.9898768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029648082,0.035235226,0.00043369734,0.00033543012,0.0012889052,0.000021099095,0.00031613445,0.00008202347,0.9326394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968323,0.00023117215,0.0005119381,0.0006512142,0.00086751324,0.0009058744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997821,0.00022580702,0.00050854293,0.0006354192,0.00040375083,0.00040549898],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006149139,0.00040864796,0.0007676739,0.00017977871,0.001034748,0.00004795063,0.0012009254,0.0008892917,0.00069185236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000758538,0.00042721134,0.00033357926,0.00065571495,0.0005638168,0.00024804045,0.00036360792,0.0007467369,0.000120559824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018704846,0.000682117,0.00093435263,0.00057381875,0.00037787316,0.0001073036,0.0048364606,0.00003581304,0.000008983183,0.21904962,0.7446607,0.028545931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047299996,0.000052621624,0.0014134751,0.00038078317,0.00015458793,0.0000014304461,0.0009240169,0.000021251648,0.000023800094,0.001447977,0.9946406,0.00046643862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122862205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46746728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3446051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075419707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010133801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256726705","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2005.9986672","title":"Law reform commission of nova Scotia final report privity of contract (third party rights)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Privity of contract; Law; Commission; Political science; Business; Exclusion clause; Contract management; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04649608744291367,"score_gpt":0.3424570061971877,"score_spread":0.29596091875427405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256726705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12416568,0.00015307276,0.0001077216,0.038303066,0.0001344819,0.00059336575,0.000043630273,0.00007728003,0.8364217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962315,0.00001767936,0.0015327657,0.00067383534,0.00018675259,0.000008725019,0.000018398063,0.000009348237,0.0013210253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980604,0.0001767647,0.00073743425,0.000238796,0.00044565464,0.0003409239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982261,0.00018559847,0.00059535337,0.00056451024,0.00020928832,0.00021913271],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016598878,0.0001287018,0.0003610664,0.00002271808,0.0005488383,0.000024381958,0.00043371913,0.00014663585,0.0009899896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006612946,0.00010721508,0.00011659881,0.00015590843,0.00073933945,0.00011060883,0.00011236034,0.00027726585,0.00013018001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003737297,0.0003460806,0.00096279324,0.000038555892,0.000009566833,0.0000046210957,0.0006859698,0.000008437037,0.00014245424,0.99073416,0.00628843,0.0007415856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034958613,0.00004611092,0.0028792585,0.000060988303,0.000014593652,0.000005379216,0.000075564254,0.000015684318,0.0019841266,0.0016462624,0.9928033,0.00011919452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2132852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13728788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016899961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016665997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280587145","doi":"10.1177/14737795211070838","title":"Strike-out Appeals, Unjust Enrichment, and Discoverability: Insights from Kenya","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Appeal; Political science; Common law; Mistake; Subject (documents); High Court; Tribunal; Interlocutory; Restitution","score_opus":0.03943548343380984,"score_gpt":0.33616096039292775,"score_spread":0.2967254769591179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280587145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010858033,0.43638262,0.00006479219,0.040302467,0.00048411792,0.0021529573,0.00025274805,0.00017667562,0.50932556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557697,0.035450485,0.000056475037,0.0044766236,0.00014575556,0.00021838542,0.00007215195,0.000010844227,0.0037995733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841154,0.00045715962,0.00030084804,0.00030168955,0.0003175418,0.00021125407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991016,0.00019127919,0.00012746576,0.00042297598,0.000021804773,0.00013488895],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045729987,0.00011371257,0.00030136426,0.00002017785,0.0015061956,0.00010757264,0.00039676632,0.000017381886,0.0009932976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020349662,0.00010023646,0.00008285593,0.00039820897,0.00021115264,0.00021741698,0.00042767447,0.0002499682,0.000046792557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020084215,0.00009363313,0.0008948001,0.00011626355,0.000013622087,0.0000016501447,0.0005955021,0.0000015579664,0.000008099313,0.979531,0.00892611,0.009815753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009036079,0.000009350925,0.00047311684,0.00015945075,0.000045076533,1.7250223e-7,0.00017025277,0.0000038506873,0.0000029945033,0.018002562,0.980913,0.00012980895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005575647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028664894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012630003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006847327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282970988","doi":"10.1017/9781009053655.012","title":"Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03060379322728132,"score_gpt":0.26654101504999245,"score_spread":0.23593722182271112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282970988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018334758,0.0001113388,0.00027815276,0.00014650839,0.0007987036,0.00041833927,0.00069718703,0.00008258296,0.9972838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006396562,0.00027659885,0.000016991236,0.000117530355,0.00040805433,0.000005943837,0.00012651522,0.00001945016,0.9926323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858576,0.00022632595,0.00010619413,0.00036870476,0.00037619873,0.00033679645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999142,0.00006711626,0.00014669336,0.00038083192,0.00008144622,0.00018191345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016603972,0.00016038795,0.00020692966,0.00009879691,0.0015221146,0.00008630532,0.0009566841,0.00022623608,0.000617326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001160319,0.00021051001,0.00014947086,0.00005803653,0.00029647836,0.00007425342,0.0005432263,0.00056362775,0.00047267257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007985245,0.000011361243,0.0000017162502,0.000011028277,0.000021526781,0.000010626337,0.0002464813,0.000010417156,0.0000024466763,0.38866514,0.6107159,0.00029535036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016292158,0.00000841706,0.000013641196,0.000009140523,0.000036990183,5.102017e-7,0.001062909,0.00001075713,0.000011231429,6.276571e-7,0.99844223,0.00024063679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01761423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005877361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3886645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004743942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005860197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283275979","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198870463.003.0011","title":"Canada—Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Wife; Spouse; Law; Jurisdiction; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Testamentary trust; Civil procedure; Marriage law; Common law; Sociology; Public law","score_opus":0.02663444300344748,"score_gpt":0.2210295468403131,"score_spread":0.19439510383686562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283275979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012735568,0.00002332782,0.000013572473,0.00047805792,0.00013623467,0.0002707501,0.00035282198,0.000065815846,0.9986467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010253534,0.00014285189,0.000028151386,0.00015994697,0.0001241719,0.0000012539326,0.000033251785,0.000017015824,0.998468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989983,0.000031095038,0.000088445464,0.00025611575,0.00040658296,0.00021949442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993382,0.000050943636,0.00011990356,0.0002791003,0.000056724355,0.00015513107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000080704915,0.00013730266,0.00015388578,0.000040874023,0.0011109811,0.000036763333,0.0006134541,0.0001314765,0.0009397132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000042759852,0.0001782185,0.000091864604,0.00000770401,0.00017694394,0.000058436806,0.00032248345,0.0003438476,7.998871e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005910156,0.0000024658823,8.5147695e-7,0.000005099842,0.00002719877,0.000035919904,0.00033469632,0.000003938553,3.2835774e-7,0.9728597,0.024254926,0.0024689864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082190185,0.0000048979855,0.0000040289747,0.0000072412336,0.000047890935,3.132542e-7,0.00023094394,0.0000018258065,0.0000013299626,0.0005443275,0.99887097,0.00020406292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.976947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98908716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97461605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011152725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027700104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283323381","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198870463.003.0010","title":"Canada—Ontario","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Spouse; Law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Property (philosophy); Ecological succession","score_opus":0.03000852938235308,"score_gpt":0.2140409123159066,"score_spread":0.18403238293355353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283323381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027171222,0.000013904352,0.000008654991,0.00026126666,0.00015174011,0.00026831005,0.00023048715,0.000050997787,0.9989875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00093372574,0.00007445796,0.000038638842,0.00013633589,0.00008863888,0.000001168343,0.000030275676,0.000014739163,0.998682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990139,0.000023730643,0.000087314605,0.00025515797,0.0004023963,0.00021752632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936926,0.00003846002,0.000114976734,0.00027076443,0.000052577063,0.00015393925],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007941027,0.0001362497,0.00015367524,0.000036750425,0.0011294254,0.00003253791,0.00058676465,0.00012761599,0.0017616241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002611003,0.00017836546,0.00009177731,0.000005869364,0.00013957653,0.000052982035,0.00032002252,0.000425602,7.068432e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006894772,0.0000025384807,0.000004430373,0.0000034132402,0.000029712017,0.000038441223,0.00083249895,0.0000038589824,1.6764486e-7,0.9798434,0.018383874,0.00085079385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008858255,0.000006866458,0.000009867413,0.0000065072836,0.000052144143,4.2692542e-7,0.00016614611,7.622985e-7,7.165006e-7,0.0006581909,0.9988067,0.00020306116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99298996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98042285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002026801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004238426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284878679","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v38.7391","title":"Incomplete Justice: The Costs of Partial Indemnity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Mistake; Misconduct; Economic Justice; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07634989612343603,"score_gpt":0.3785023178552912,"score_spread":0.3021524217318552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284878679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79787433,0.00013365375,0.0010553667,0.014314854,0.0008410733,0.0015213261,0.00026357523,0.000080942205,0.18391487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980212,0.00001057968,0.00015606234,0.00083298254,0.00033849437,0.00009418311,0.0000033227423,0.000010072346,0.0005330915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844503,0.00022940955,0.00028843392,0.00018106023,0.00061778806,0.00023827548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884534,0.00037469174,0.00020853737,0.0003306433,0.00013566056,0.0001051063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008958972,0.00007926386,0.00015730063,0.00005990331,0.00091709784,0.000057685087,0.0012357028,0.00003505587,0.0007260346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029526144,0.00006949581,0.00006308939,0.0005671831,0.00024289956,0.00016430348,0.000672335,0.0002283028,0.00002522317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030467927,0.0007301963,0.008199314,0.00028379963,0.00012272224,0.0000064396195,0.03379812,0.010654864,0.0036025012,0.90226984,0.029849954,0.010177587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062273396,0.00018516326,0.04089287,0.00004096014,0.0007753532,0.0000016212852,0.021373393,0.0007086543,0.0014746941,0.0019720034,0.93156815,0.00038439984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004251359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040428425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9017182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009849423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027414458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7949569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285171280","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4096183","title":"Set-Off and Penalties in the Common Law (Rechtsdurchsetzung durch Aufrechnung und Vertragsstrafe im Common Law)","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.020397547506952017,"score_gpt":0.3124834669237988,"score_spread":0.2920859194168468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285171280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86411214,0.07368841,0.000035815236,0.040297676,0.0006578623,0.0009953915,0.00009859994,0.00006175007,0.020052329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806645,0.016611388,0.000010995433,0.0011978415,0.0006270427,0.0000671368,0.000026081358,0.00003437262,0.00076062523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99356925,0.0015966526,0.0006566419,0.00040442465,0.0010136011,0.0027594187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985681,0.0004918247,0.0003417131,0.00038135968,0.000052136365,0.00016485635],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00772238,0.00030962875,0.00040354213,0.00010330992,0.0058779996,0.000513317,0.0013998876,0.00015065604,0.00012792482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001782873,0.00026313588,0.00018684077,0.00071053044,0.00072980527,0.0003622613,0.00035173452,0.0065936744,0.000031565214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054704993,0.00016099216,0.0012531584,0.000011286337,0.00015040656,0.000018401955,0.013682994,0.00016272749,0.00003912166,0.97966427,0.00029990607,0.0045020333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009104611,0.0004950577,0.0009606907,0.000034240435,0.00022453997,0.00023916463,0.085746445,0.0003882133,0.000020187239,0.48221558,0.42831028,0.00045514049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02279363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18819936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49744868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019519661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018827439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285339988","doi":"10.5347/isonomia.v0i55.487","title":"Legal Positivism as a Theory of Law’s Existence","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Positivism; Philosophy; Legal positivism; Political science; Legal realism; Legal research; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.033529858301173526,"score_gpt":0.32815659370454997,"score_spread":0.29462673540337647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285339988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16406381,0.0050534937,0.0030319714,0.0078726625,0.00025775834,0.0008491844,0.000497998,0.000199046,0.81817406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795852,0.0011301638,0.0042413226,0.0021882537,0.0005777315,0.00009248158,0.000050584764,0.000072197894,0.012062066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995201,0.0012903906,0.0009809495,0.0009423311,0.0006711731,0.00091417535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962497,0.0009857101,0.0005743691,0.0012021682,0.0005110614,0.00047703256],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018483887,0.00048182186,0.00081169134,0.00009480341,0.00093878276,0.0009655135,0.0010523401,0.0004239933,0.0011308796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081594376,0.0005167189,0.0005607269,0.0006292164,0.0010161274,0.00056219683,0.00041718324,0.00079792563,0.0005981471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059748276,0.0004706385,0.00048904447,0.00021885516,0.00014436562,0.00009079665,0.0021407378,0.000005783753,0.0024043182,0.9837366,0.0010662405,0.009172915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006034987,0.00017124676,0.0011810135,0.0006950058,0.0003121008,0.00008552968,0.0023870396,0.000103746286,0.0039525824,0.08257772,0.9071708,0.00075972057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003560246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018810834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90610456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003748334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016482552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285370838","doi":"10.54648/erpl2021032","title":"The Nature of the Beneficiary’s Interest in English, Japanese and Quebec Trusts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Trust law; Property (philosophy); Blind trust; Settlor; Express trust; Perspective (graphical); Business; Law; Property rights; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019536728055711928,"score_gpt":0.28135694679351547,"score_spread":0.26182021873780353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285370838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61794966,0.08403675,0.00005123627,0.022581298,0.0010749394,0.0022307518,0.00009854672,0.00022160243,0.27175522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93922657,0.05383198,0.0006501179,0.0019800256,0.00052720757,0.000026789616,0.000024712941,0.00012244805,0.0036101595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929751,0.0034051854,0.0015440433,0.0008045833,0.0004893285,0.0007817306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953698,0.0008840284,0.00094775774,0.0019630261,0.00057702535,0.00025836987],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00461499,0.00043300632,0.0007701211,0.000074783966,0.00063293,0.00017178559,0.0025560707,0.00018756953,0.00008585493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057130754,0.00032751926,0.00039459745,0.001601453,0.0010131513,0.00031283288,0.0017180194,0.0016004851,0.000032975357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020433874,0.00019956789,0.0015119042,0.0016424977,0.00006325142,0.000065348955,0.003632862,0.000008354979,0.0020745879,0.9778725,0.00063789694,0.012270783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045675784,0.000043544038,0.02012118,0.004975175,0.00011560127,0.000030250481,0.0006446687,0.000018549956,0.0014009102,0.0007404577,0.97104615,0.00040675228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062095426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005159379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053394822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034329668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285488683","doi":"10.54648/eulr2021002","title":"Origins, Evolution and Comparison of Moral Rights between Civil and Common Law Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Business Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Civil rights; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06619828532321455,"score_gpt":0.338041073248979,"score_spread":0.27184278792576444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285488683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08871149,0.3812266,0.0006581982,0.004735922,0.00027814312,0.0011754376,0.0000909802,0.0001502568,0.52297294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931506,0.0063399044,0.000058543126,0.00012774242,0.00016464718,0.0000042027586,0.000025268986,0.000008793585,0.00012033373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998742,0.0004548823,0.00032000474,0.00018457146,0.00017267145,0.00012589408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932593,0.000055605597,0.00015565779,0.00019700723,0.00018764006,0.000078177094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053136033,0.00008682178,0.00035061408,0.00000908743,0.00041217633,0.0000807994,0.00011925408,0.000022693406,0.000014843991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019143541,0.000073674244,0.000027011074,0.0003084938,0.00029457945,0.00015152809,0.000090289635,0.000074692085,0.000020517393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.148478e-7,0.000022277774,0.0033096431,0.00087162794,0.0000075223734,0.0000023932853,0.000106724015,0.0000019195143,0.0000107035985,0.9946858,0.00025445264,0.0007264992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087178785,0.0000047836083,0.017505772,0.0014691078,0.00007075467,0.000002011912,0.000031042964,0.000010092744,0.000006110763,0.0005442738,0.9801716,0.000097268094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0118815685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005049392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041572843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000326159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285665165","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198854159.001.0001","title":"The Principles of Equity &amp; Trusts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Equity (law); Doctrine; Law; Constructive trust; Settlor; Duty; Common law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0967278319668677,"score_gpt":0.30384906586099586,"score_spread":0.20712123389412818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285665165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044096316,0.00005821423,0.00014941882,0.00041703807,0.00009501155,0.0004587243,0.0001498056,0.00007964469,0.99854803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010147911,0.00057841314,0.00015057453,0.000033975746,0.00019728231,0.0000016733293,0.000019489575,0.000014404009,0.9979894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987462,0.00010233466,0.00017870702,0.00026328993,0.0004386297,0.0002708164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987448,0.00022292713,0.00031286303,0.00041940834,0.0001354027,0.0001645869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028134455,0.00015233345,0.00022771991,0.0000296057,0.0010796518,0.00007252829,0.0013005997,0.00023958042,0.000020517431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005371029,0.00013839525,0.00019093232,0.000026140031,0.0007699137,0.000058607664,0.000877541,0.00034748187,0.000002701664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022936994,0.0000072420526,0.0000035197347,0.000029455838,0.000047316174,0.0000023424936,0.0016288827,0.0000036450303,0.0000041060584,0.98355645,0.010874911,0.003819169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001142866,0.000010727166,0.000013076948,0.000029930583,0.000075217264,1.4519055e-7,0.00025141687,0.0000065216504,0.000013413306,0.0018895647,0.9974489,0.00014679928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005966224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002332171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025960465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009562466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83039176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285675853","doi":"10.54648/erpl2020017","title":"Private Governance and the Potential of Private Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Private law; Rulemaking; Business; Law and economics; Public law; Public administration; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.018484747588068326,"score_gpt":0.26851715926120695,"score_spread":0.2500324116731386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285675853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10006287,0.078038536,0.012105365,0.1099057,0.0009570718,0.008695238,0.00052406144,0.0011449468,0.6885662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8756226,0.10149908,0.008372025,0.012089232,0.0011751285,0.000056949866,0.000056011737,0.00028786893,0.00084114796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028736,0.0036134028,0.0024775995,0.0013310944,0.0011012254,0.0011893131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411696,0.0005696748,0.0022293963,0.0019437454,0.0004069594,0.0007332754],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005571444,0.0007709367,0.0016301395,0.00006146948,0.000852503,0.00021007932,0.003693142,0.00017198914,0.0002733201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025826474,0.0006651289,0.00071290816,0.0014284808,0.0029741973,0.0006390526,0.0021885023,0.001278099,0.0002764209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013515608,0.00015599957,0.00016936712,0.0033410182,0.00016223735,0.000077032026,0.0015808379,0.000032155735,0.0057108477,0.9826023,0.0007284809,0.005304593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020579908,0.0001827729,0.0023744362,0.003044414,0.0004217851,0.000041814583,0.0000795608,0.00017923517,0.0019364213,0.0026318536,0.9862827,0.0007669889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021403677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022737622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039906892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017677632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286662954","doi":"10.1017/9781139020305.006","title":"Index","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02878287345582851,"score_gpt":0.2653756753710287,"score_spread":0.23659280191520018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286662954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024993552,0.00009216014,0.0007617439,0.000121078076,0.0010742764,0.00052258326,0.00039964163,0.000068098954,0.9967105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016823798,0.00023037005,0.000019908555,0.000102615806,0.0004816992,0.0000017692024,0.0000725004,0.000019033556,0.9822483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874145,0.00013752861,0.00010559282,0.00037223706,0.00029489337,0.00034828298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.00006893886,0.00014846036,0.0004343169,0.00013297697,0.0001737184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012737447,0.0001739766,0.00023954261,0.00008710378,0.0005774884,0.00010308849,0.00082794135,0.0004025431,0.00008085685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010849748,0.0002112687,0.00014829778,0.000040509865,0.0002851073,0.000091724985,0.00028449946,0.00041884778,0.0024215307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007589759,0.000008544991,0.000003831911,0.000021782593,0.000023286479,0.0000038784656,0.00018192975,0.000008983049,0.000005154923,0.3882697,0.6112349,0.00023041076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001955167,0.0000070813667,0.000024606443,0.00003144459,0.000031978958,2.8661168e-7,0.00047870295,0.000018955674,0.000027432096,4.5485612e-7,0.998931,0.00025256057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012339986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053883246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38826922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028266988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005811423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288076586","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4164118","title":"Possession, Relativity of Title and Ownership in English Law by Luke Rostill (Book Review)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Law; Theory of relativity; Political science; Theoretical physics; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.009819476829125637,"score_gpt":0.28742540961619906,"score_spread":0.2776059327870734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288076586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010309539,0.45274618,0.000276833,0.0122448495,0.00014912985,0.0001994099,0.00001123969,0.000026420044,0.5240364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7902163,0.18520716,0.000037114496,0.0008065907,0.00012906436,0.0000026390849,0.0000031211962,0.000006096572,0.023591895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935657,0.00007974988,0.0001000005,0.00006259836,0.00010010798,0.00030099318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976784,0.000032982833,0.000053255735,0.000051265848,0.000062108804,0.00003252371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074328925,0.000029437066,0.00007057182,0.000008337175,0.000091688366,0.000011433307,0.00006012445,0.000031872547,0.00021226317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001394371,0.000024767674,0.000022484524,0.000102400794,0.000051355546,0.000081702965,0.0000143409525,0.0004063272,0.00000792727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010539615,0.000024343706,0.00045647775,0.0000114521845,0.0000058650007,5.8313765e-7,0.0003343382,1.9772047e-7,0.000097302785,0.9824077,0.014247151,0.0024135197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008003674,0.000009395557,0.0001249531,0.00007770358,0.000006927059,0.0000039958218,0.00047986684,0.0000013161323,0.00008005735,0.039340608,0.95975417,0.000040961626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019560764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002232005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94550705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011800635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006712258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23241328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288685648","doi":"10.1007/s10991-022-09299-2","title":"Contract Negotiations and the Common Law: A Move to Good Faith in Commercial Contracting?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Liverpool Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Good faith; Negotiation; Common law; Duty; Political science; Faith; Fair dealing; Bad faith; Convention; Theology","score_opus":0.022067277369118656,"score_gpt":0.32435443073504233,"score_spread":0.30228715336592366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288685648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040399306,0.051603314,0.00008892484,0.24517722,0.0003765767,0.009746169,0.00034131767,0.000163561,0.6521036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617877,0.0024906613,0.000048826205,0.034931693,0.00007705497,0.0004945843,0.000006754288,0.0000070046735,0.00015569081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984366,0.000651544,0.0002751904,0.00017265233,0.0002504317,0.00021353159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888533,0.0006584495,0.00012284637,0.00020876764,0.000033653207,0.00009096793],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013728997,0.000085813735,0.0002890266,0.000012545225,0.0014361738,0.000083858045,0.0003159302,0.00002386098,0.0002942776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009088756,0.000067336405,0.00007233638,0.00029417628,0.00021492715,0.00013163417,0.00016395087,0.00029384895,0.000029981851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010130137,0.000054201842,0.00034565353,0.00002733273,0.000007924166,0.0000015745684,0.0020396349,0.000005243077,0.0000016103107,0.9937096,0.00044776272,0.0033493259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004534362,0.00001649306,0.002470896,0.00010860155,0.000044430017,0.0000020142056,0.00041545453,0.000024358147,8.8849623e-7,0.0031252755,0.993239,0.000099171964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070916906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067423984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99279124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091906484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006094337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289450774","doi":"10.7202/1090691ar","title":"L’exercice du pouvoir discrétionnaire dans les fiducies testamentaires au Québec : recourir à l’affectation pour concilier l’intention du testateur et la décision de la « personne raisonnable »","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"DuPont (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01406085831492147,"score_gpt":0.27914334614749486,"score_spread":0.2650824878325734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289450774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9031638,0.0006494868,0.0034219914,0.050638363,0.00029075582,0.0005565661,0.0002243661,0.00015184008,0.04090282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96810925,0.0012149069,0.0007719592,0.00031151364,0.00046722763,0.00036524376,0.00010780476,0.000055860673,0.028596222],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642015,0.0015584546,0.00042077267,0.00053698046,0.00041239336,0.0006512246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789345,0.001128534,0.0003085259,0.00029812363,0.00014234403,0.0002290073],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024952511,0.0002374858,0.00030361017,0.000105443505,0.0025698764,0.00023600385,0.00047050772,0.00018430232,0.00053401326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006565921,0.00033274412,0.00027182227,0.00061484287,0.0006604063,0.0005374215,0.00019492656,0.00058090384,0.00007507565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014124037,0.0020809886,0.2646134,0.00054607954,0.00014386258,0.00021092198,0.3809408,0.010871114,0.010094614,0.24837255,0.016399235,0.06558518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014743013,0.0003649344,0.18627419,0.00055187166,0.0003565361,0.00053646107,0.2744794,0.024955371,0.00043049167,0.025893094,0.4836467,0.0010366692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2536693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090406425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46724746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003958293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016013788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294929074","doi":"10.1017/9781108923286.011","title":"Index","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03137731620715978,"score_gpt":0.26929102680918493,"score_spread":0.23791371060202515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294929074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023678078,0.00023244666,0.00074159424,0.00016644964,0.00070075574,0.00028792006,0.00034665465,0.00006254496,0.99722487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070143756,0.00047682496,0.000039977527,0.000112110065,0.00060113467,0.0000021895698,0.00012257033,0.00001719908,0.9916136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986929,0.00018489615,0.00010836867,0.0003868457,0.00029364682,0.00033329704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901116,0.00006262138,0.00012467943,0.00039859695,0.00019493308,0.00020798165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000115680414,0.00016612941,0.00023733411,0.000069012174,0.0007881155,0.00013791073,0.0006625385,0.00037972792,0.00012041582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017883287,0.00021186184,0.00016216125,0.000055122637,0.00031454582,0.000076458666,0.00032860463,0.0004236166,0.00042201282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004328637,0.000011864543,0.0000019674121,0.000018658955,0.000029464103,0.000021619917,0.00021393562,0.0000036852368,0.000008134528,0.38706815,0.6122861,0.00033208626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015423328,0.000003944034,0.000018016384,0.000039241168,0.000042039297,6.4880163e-7,0.00092375994,0.000008839062,0.000069013,4.3088235e-7,0.9985,0.00023985011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012031819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012781406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38706774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027236086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078284397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295008979","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v12n1p51","title":"Abolishing the Office of Lord Chancellor","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Management; Medicine; History; Economics","score_opus":0.15133768310110957,"score_gpt":0.46981333312230444,"score_spread":0.3184756500211949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295008979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06323719,0.00007012484,0.000043179418,0.042367212,0.000279883,0.00020456844,0.000048619597,0.000015277563,0.8937339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98615724,0.000026674808,0.00003752711,0.00024802182,0.00030612294,0.00010740677,0.000005563242,0.0000037608288,0.013107695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821013,0.00022573951,0.000100402285,0.00010181702,0.001203757,0.00015814247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991368,0.00039742948,0.00003492843,0.00012600233,0.00027367173,0.000031145264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002283468,0.000023435001,0.000035464283,0.000038262995,0.0012460835,0.000078632984,0.00097314466,0.000012321977,0.0015288776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001478294,0.00001924658,0.00003208538,0.0002843222,0.00033868267,0.000096918346,0.00036418386,0.0002920176,0.000041987383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099801755,0.000040022816,0.00007764747,8.72521e-7,0.0000066798752,6.3963216e-7,0.0018195175,0.00008042147,0.00042681946,0.99415714,0.0023898652,0.0009903972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048371792,0.000008879991,0.00029674554,0.0000016866004,6.0294644e-7,3.1109522e-7,0.0025828155,0.00011014964,0.00024301436,0.010240319,0.98644525,0.00002186495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02134088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002891699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011718155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013360071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296824521","doi":"10.4324/9781003139614-22","title":"Notes from the periphery","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; History","score_opus":0.05423582788297486,"score_gpt":0.29695769345345013,"score_spread":0.24272186557047526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296824521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000119506785,0.00028545663,0.000033271448,0.021060815,0.00014187652,0.00016449325,0.000104141414,0.00006204579,0.97813594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009322474,0.00043209296,0.00010953465,0.0016185064,0.00085156236,0.000024883526,0.00003981961,0.0000148788995,0.98758626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999365,0.000017372418,0.00009142533,0.00015877787,0.0002693004,0.000098152275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993163,0.00032800212,0.000052836625,0.00024484255,0.000019949946,0.000038066824],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014055196,0.00007605954,0.000080566184,0.000006240026,0.00092713936,0.00007542763,0.0004067381,0.00007938846,0.087870896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024876099,0.0000519586,0.00009226339,0.00001606624,0.00016075511,0.000035922658,0.0001349884,0.00023096486,0.0004664914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.1173186e-7,0.000002073898,0.000009731626,2.2604686e-7,0.0000100458155,4.3397884e-7,0.0011608113,6.433626e-7,9.228972e-7,0.98137504,0.0123827355,0.005056905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013822768,0.0000021220728,0.00003523768,0.0000021446401,0.000012462503,3.6392457e-8,0.0003634893,0.0000011295011,4.1523114e-7,0.06346888,0.93602294,0.00007733479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022146014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013443936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9236402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006378391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014352662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297470818","doi":"10.1017/9781009063814.016","title":"General Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.032540023564774985,"score_gpt":0.2419149097349429,"score_spread":0.20937488617016792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297470818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007667245,0.000047622998,0.00008849477,0.00014397163,0.00018606514,0.000343717,0.00029557897,0.000142574,0.9986753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002292246,0.00015943927,0.00003653514,0.00011637782,0.00033582805,0.0000018496778,0.00004373386,0.000024728462,0.99698925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888945,0.000048987455,0.000106379666,0.00033982698,0.00037033367,0.00024504302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923015,0.000037923477,0.00013540273,0.00034737188,0.00007541456,0.00017375295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012903172,0.0001666514,0.00018546704,0.00008600957,0.0010909282,0.00005220754,0.0006507878,0.00020804262,0.0001634903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000054453953,0.00022065136,0.00016914673,0.00001038829,0.000319226,0.00007846443,0.00045267446,0.00045505853,0.000024760448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009501983,0.0000049088535,0.0000027883157,0.0000057788234,0.00003263917,0.00004149382,0.00018437271,0.0000043361474,0.000002764348,0.95638484,0.04261026,0.0007163196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014554133,0.000009237276,0.000013238779,0.000007659998,0.00005488167,9.350983e-7,0.00011451369,0.000013760861,0.00000376017,0.000054410953,0.9993321,0.00024999728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056317737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008779265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004105306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003118049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89979017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297489070","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwac036","title":"The Voluntary Sterilisation Act: Best Interests, Caregivers, and Disability Rights","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Best interests; Eugenics; Commonwealth; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Compromise; Human rights; Convention; Sociology","score_opus":0.026144583086995854,"score_gpt":0.3358336273762773,"score_spread":0.30968904428928146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297489070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09618332,0.14874618,0.000063867694,0.5582724,0.0012907161,0.0033928636,0.000116661184,0.00018225025,0.19175172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97983164,0.017227566,0.000014012681,0.0020105564,0.00017971946,0.0001557912,0.000017663502,0.0000036248716,0.00055943796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869007,0.00037316786,0.00016650293,0.00014729101,0.00049132225,0.00013162373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993614,0.00024129667,0.000047536323,0.00018695337,0.000019435363,0.00014341148],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013432737,0.000049320013,0.000107377346,0.0000020791842,0.0018034999,0.000032659165,0.0003101641,0.00002179289,0.001544059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016622974,0.000031339758,0.000042677682,0.000105045714,0.0007636312,0.00006662548,0.00020729862,0.00018679157,0.000019203882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030473454,0.00005645813,0.0005633191,0.00013100174,0.00000702395,0.0000020057714,0.000989089,4.45404e-8,2.1497428e-7,0.91641426,0.0072855316,0.07454803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004061779,0.000013218543,0.0002939853,0.000099554345,0.000016076281,0.0000014167454,0.00033061497,0.000006395142,1.7664334e-7,0.0022028324,0.99695283,0.000042254218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013841585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029044367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98966736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010616515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072458664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297634351","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190887353.013.21","title":"Life and Other Basic Rights in Anscombe","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Dignity; Argument (complex analysis); Transcendental number; Metaphysics; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.035307277935864155,"score_gpt":0.24278986073553166,"score_spread":0.2074825827996675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297634351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045280377,0.0000402293,0.000007081319,0.00017119665,0.00005004105,0.00031545895,0.00010491377,0.000049175826,0.9988091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070742746,0.00011402809,0.000039814593,0.00017500129,0.0000712972,0.0000017304213,0.0000055620767,0.000012164743,0.99250615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999216,0.000044377837,0.00009290386,0.00027000974,0.00020301978,0.00017367158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994763,0.000053031425,0.00008806236,0.00019511019,0.000019204346,0.00016827979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001237237,0.00012690153,0.00016640745,0.00009019734,0.0005682357,0.000036345376,0.0003247233,0.00015677913,0.00043274413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000047632443,0.00014812555,0.00006149904,0.000010774318,0.0002486748,0.00007087692,0.00023491064,0.00030527194,0.000001043426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012237319,0.0000067836863,0.000028508523,0.0000067138362,0.000015940343,0.000013492592,0.0014165037,0.0000016459966,4.990809e-7,0.99731576,0.0007290903,0.0004528059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002096116,0.000010547817,0.000015921103,0.000014588077,0.00002337981,2.8285635e-7,0.00016235531,0.0000046207947,8.0076506e-7,0.004843056,0.9945418,0.00017298714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077933404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005744994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99381274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014130167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015911531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299655356","doi":"10.1093/clp/cuw014","title":"Massively Discretionary Trusts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Legal Problems","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Property (philosophy); Express trust; Law; Trust law; Constitution; Business; Blind trust; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07345307859784406,"score_gpt":0.38955188301024496,"score_spread":0.3160988044124009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299655356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044516373,0.001151497,0.002490232,0.044874772,0.0024859079,0.0012228827,0.00009254582,0.00030441294,0.90286136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992781,0.00020633572,0.00010514552,0.000036331166,0.00068057794,0.00008417126,0.000014643433,0.000009587372,0.006082201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989596,0.00004278454,0.00015853705,0.00023999743,0.00029948718,0.00029956325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917597,0.000023257297,0.0001643568,0.00040041027,0.00007617711,0.00015983895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002884958,0.00009402585,0.00009990144,0.000025335756,0.0026161347,0.000525946,0.0006704492,0.00005282793,0.00022859858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012508027,0.00008501142,0.00007898326,0.000054447137,0.00040940449,0.0006611036,0.00014491187,0.00020040086,0.00033897726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002879768,0.000094353294,0.0046848105,0.00001789221,0.0000066879925,0.0000012286949,0.0010531151,0.000013002103,0.00008971287,0.958506,0.006878179,0.02865214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014793182,0.0000083505565,0.015075386,0.000034720768,0.000007675421,4.0876063e-7,0.00010370702,0.000089963316,0.000017237784,0.01148442,0.97289515,0.00013502514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014067243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057876937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000639637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016942933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300969943","doi":"10.1017/9781009063760.024","title":"General Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.032540023564774985,"score_gpt":0.2419149097349429,"score_spread":0.20937488617016792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300969943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007667245,0.000047622998,0.00008849477,0.00014397163,0.00018606514,0.000343717,0.00029557897,0.000142574,0.9986753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002292246,0.00015943927,0.00003653514,0.00011637782,0.00033582805,0.0000018496778,0.00004373386,0.000024728462,0.99698925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888945,0.000048987455,0.000106379666,0.00033982698,0.00037033367,0.00024504302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923015,0.000037923477,0.00013540273,0.00034737188,0.00007541456,0.00017375295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012903172,0.0001666514,0.00018546704,0.00008600957,0.0010909282,0.00005220754,0.0006507878,0.00020804262,0.0001634903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000054453953,0.00022065136,0.00016914673,0.00001038829,0.000319226,0.00007846443,0.00045267446,0.00045505853,0.000024760448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009501983,0.0000049088535,0.0000027883157,0.0000057788234,0.00003263917,0.00004149382,0.00018437271,0.0000043361474,0.000002764348,0.95638484,0.04261026,0.0007163196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014554133,0.000009237276,0.000013238779,0.000007659998,0.00005488167,9.350983e-7,0.00011451369,0.000013760861,0.00000376017,0.000054410953,0.9993321,0.00024999728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056317737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008779265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9567218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004105306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003118049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89979017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302094076","doi":"","title":"DIVISIONS AND SEGREGATIONS OF THE PATRIMONY","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.32638974359305156,"score_gpt":0.6012905631752379,"score_spread":0.2749008195821863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302094076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94466907,0.007060227,0.0002092928,0.0019310242,0.0003361097,0.00051565416,0.00006677396,0.00001786672,0.04519398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952586,0.003524499,0.0001438896,0.00013242029,0.00018003017,0.000022791053,0.0000014022548,0.000011029634,0.0007253042],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850696,0.00023640259,0.00038716337,0.00013764581,0.00047405506,0.0002577584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984451,0.00036725725,0.00046965497,0.00031440234,0.0001828582,0.00022072022],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012755523,0.00010191535,0.00023686717,0.00013094142,0.0009412921,0.00038861771,0.0015364218,0.00006409495,0.0021949606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041700204,0.000072771414,0.00010992286,0.00084185606,0.000354386,0.001505814,0.000742689,0.0001966352,0.000006851204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006249404,0.00019328002,0.93180645,0.00001438904,0.000045062014,2.0010606e-7,0.0031848354,0.000015514248,0.0070422245,0.03210422,0.014826315,0.010761266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010189821,0.0000012632297,0.8711819,0.00006338345,0.00004479438,7.033606e-7,0.00068287534,0.000007986915,0.0018719462,0.008747962,0.11718289,0.00011239015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004366453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045550766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102356575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003975442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015000872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4305014601","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0047","title":"Private law legalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Private law; Law; Political science; Rationality; Private rights; Law and economics; Public law; Property rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.015386625497086276,"score_gpt":0.24837166932680332,"score_spread":0.23298504382971705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4305014601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019628853,0.00020243273,0.0003271558,0.003284267,0.00018134585,0.00007624927,0.000021760696,0.000022887523,0.97625506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478155,0.00008442185,0.0008672886,0.0001619436,0.0000973989,8.018615e-8,0.0000012456551,0.0000026299751,0.004003423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934846,0.00010874528,0.00006475205,0.000067154935,0.00027949977,0.00013135916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996518,0.000017349494,0.0000972877,0.00008332586,0.000049728886,0.00010050281],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003345976,0.000033808206,0.00006717943,0.0000058260703,0.0035665734,0.000028266824,0.0004011058,0.00001891601,0.00533624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000033352355,0.000041388397,0.00007418513,0.000028275912,0.00020630928,0.00036132737,0.00013386492,0.00013511073,0.0000061686146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095092255,0.000034672772,0.00004709344,7.1556974e-7,0.000011529092,0.0000067857413,0.0063234763,0.000041056595,0.00008054481,0.9914977,0.0015900134,0.00035687903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017804425,0.000023196259,0.00018634932,0.0000016857224,0.000010989702,0.0000048462152,0.012839025,0.000006585564,0.0000080516065,0.00272472,0.98396736,0.00004914683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3035434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25558335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003991231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067525754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306643343","doi":"10.32388/p3k0i5","title":"Review of: \"Geach’s “Good” and “Bad”, Attributive After All\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Attributive; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06162447648301926,"score_gpt":0.39503883054386263,"score_spread":0.33341435406084335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306643343","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000014913263,0.58402234,0.000013050109,0.17223656,0.0002437509,0.0010566952,0.00080342847,0.000032907923,0.24158978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000055218665,0.69062126,0.0001416063,0.024197409,0.00018776144,0.0004977613,0.00037245342,0.000013051363,0.28391346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805236,0.0002598737,0.0004511691,0.0003887346,0.00057361275,0.0002742767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878657,0.0001565544,0.0002892156,0.00039070533,0.00023351664,0.00014342048],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014494776,0.00019275043,0.00063335046,0.00003366143,0.00019645145,0.00002725974,0.00044457777,0.00012131309,0.024483435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026888493,0.0001625787,0.00022179735,0.0003375819,0.00020252544,0.00007215476,0.00037049167,0.00039066077,0.0000751147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.4621227e-7,0.000026744185,0.000014139111,0.008258783,0.000027078546,0.0000015269812,0.00018378317,6.7842656e-9,1.0008748e-7,0.025496397,0.9604574,0.005533285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003676305,0.000015000875,0.000039887054,0.007735568,0.00022784458,0.0000011676002,0.00006139857,1.6518494e-7,3.3881287e-7,0.00027418075,0.99141204,0.00019563889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042693233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016740888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14803915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012106578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040488064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9764083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306863431","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198754183.001.0001","title":"Reciprocal Freedom","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Comparative law; Law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Municipal law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03521161311166615,"score_gpt":0.3139180534021201,"score_spread":0.27870644029045394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306863431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001386841,0.000076568685,0.000055105025,0.0025833219,0.00024387681,0.00023164463,0.00003322695,0.00012719881,0.99664766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011588452,0.0000966438,0.00029556494,0.00035953772,0.0009411379,0.000065192784,0.00005354208,0.000013891068,0.9980586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991416,0.00003125541,0.00013049137,0.00018694843,0.0003545144,0.00015519434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957466,0.00007123876,0.00006277082,0.00019157944,0.00002934287,0.000070399714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028216798,0.00007345711,0.000102626385,0.000028619006,0.00067800836,0.00005038061,0.0003845183,0.00012535248,0.023955269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029926501,0.00007241746,0.00008312722,0.00006363636,0.00014691593,0.000035437588,0.00013431444,0.00029340707,0.00067433366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.2907502e-7,0.000004926118,6.5621515e-7,0.0000011281991,0.000003382789,6.2957974e-7,0.00031173317,0.0000021923465,1.3977424e-7,0.6023514,0.39628556,0.0010379055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002533428,0.0000060781067,0.000002208742,0.000002215362,0.000008033379,1.3322263e-7,0.0002301785,0.0000021921599,2.182179e-7,0.03004614,0.96957636,0.00010088769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002218708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033231382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5732908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003289048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010032086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W430697676","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1064","title":"See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Remedy No Evil: How the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal is Failing to Protect the Most Fundamental Rights of Residential Tenants","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Fair Housing Act; Renting; Rental housing; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Civil rights","score_opus":0.03292165400689023,"score_gpt":0.32288142651925045,"score_spread":0.2899597725123602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W430697676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931321,0.00007694305,0.000008834413,0.033972487,0.00025432097,0.00070633076,0.000053451036,0.000014809246,0.0335918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888786,0.00007921801,0.000112947055,0.0015364672,0.0050054477,0.000008420092,0.000001512079,0.000014711246,0.0043626465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779683,0.00027517235,0.0005021663,0.00018137215,0.00080827903,0.0004361839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886453,0.00009104249,0.00038879976,0.00015165508,0.00032788195,0.00017609162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011417163,0.00016796943,0.00033715795,0.000055999506,0.0028642588,0.00041308277,0.00046298205,0.00012695638,0.00036922257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084405816,0.0000998942,0.00024691457,0.00027987506,0.00053978513,0.000397418,0.000102207254,0.00048738247,0.00005766811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039906222,0.0016709717,0.0038031081,0.000232806,0.0014170287,0.0000836061,0.6227539,0.000070832495,0.023768114,0.17795137,0.13143468,0.032822963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008982079,0.00031016985,0.0036427518,0.00014099796,0.000096883654,0.00001788549,0.0023653999,0.000015195254,0.0004110282,0.0025014558,0.9893566,0.00024346789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23363432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10892725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8579219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039545886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074191747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308077846","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2022.70.3.ptp","title":"Personal Tax Planning: Reviewing a Will—Tax Considerations for Non-Legal Advisers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tax planning; Business; Estate planning; Accounting; Tax reform; Estate; Perspective (graphical); Estate tax; Law and economics; Tax avoidance; Finance; Double taxation; Public economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.042064240589997755,"score_gpt":0.2767684388159865,"score_spread":0.23470419822598876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308077846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1716608,0.0027417075,0.0021476292,0.7466886,0.004656337,0.004168976,0.011218806,0.00012914569,0.05658802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351153,0.000076445336,0.0015734206,0.0038697743,0.0018871711,0.0005416107,0.00008567747,0.00006125433,0.056789394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997267,0.00020234052,0.0005032564,0.00041413357,0.0002558373,0.0013574352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638665,0.00029614908,0.0003187801,0.00026931422,0.00029243142,0.0024366959],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015058133,0.00022610257,0.00035069638,0.00035366623,0.0077803712,0.00039577857,0.00053135573,0.000110777444,0.002362738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009622187,0.00027294736,0.00027579602,0.0005746312,0.00019201284,0.00042385995,0.00005136854,0.000846972,0.00001424874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012882307,0.000038020487,0.0017839294,0.000051520878,0.000108937435,0.0004832435,0.03207141,0.0011824886,0.00007649745,0.039579652,0.92211807,0.0024933708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036609804,0.00007167413,0.0005150002,0.00006400897,0.00006216722,0.00035998083,0.010579343,0.0007573507,0.0000026602077,0.0026432523,0.9842193,0.00035913166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32890603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9286395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76345444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028959732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042807073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308964972","doi":"10.1515/jtl-2022-0014","title":"Public Nuisance is a Tort","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Tort Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Plaintiff; Political science; Law and economics; Cause of action; Action (physics); Law; Business; Liability; Economics","score_opus":0.0883632060783345,"score_gpt":0.33395912214764806,"score_spread":0.24559591606931355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308964972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16290091,0.00062701234,0.00018927862,0.08842783,0.0011811072,0.000182941,0.00002639988,0.000032819997,0.7464317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925269,0.000033369877,0.00025755045,0.0021562045,0.00055427826,0.000006155065,3.2872228e-7,0.0000043571413,0.00446085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990715,0.000053358825,0.00019747845,0.000060253024,0.00047758975,0.00013984277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994613,0.000027240287,0.00019444952,0.00009506709,0.00010876298,0.00011316094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006544988,0.000035486144,0.00008690577,0.000024588633,0.0007533285,0.00007329291,0.00035512634,0.000017190941,0.00200304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030301984,0.000032912903,0.00009438161,0.00016707927,0.000075405405,0.00023527285,0.00006733379,0.00017947932,0.000014040956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053282365,0.000092234026,0.0021756706,0.0000013934483,0.000017819673,0.000009904199,0.0025674712,0.000010931485,0.000096343705,0.944451,0.049294516,0.0012774292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000786529,0.000030057403,0.0006977383,0.0000014920239,0.0000058970863,0.000009049763,0.00078201847,0.000003880213,0.000021221518,0.0033666042,0.9949616,0.00004177662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006433642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003608321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001627436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026784657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309241573","doi":"10.1017/9781009082662","title":"Monetary Redress for Abuse in State Care","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Programming language; Law","score_opus":0.02579847396822454,"score_gpt":0.24867807964555735,"score_spread":0.2228796056773328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309241573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008483058,0.00023979806,0.00007429052,0.00004760313,0.00016383614,0.0012824149,0.002010935,0.00009619984,0.99523664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014140212,0.00024544567,0.00008148255,0.000055003828,0.00013468426,0.000019796082,0.00032998197,0.00002836366,0.9976912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867886,0.00011067054,0.00015183621,0.00042546794,0.00028689025,0.00034625808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999139,0.000100868725,0.00014850358,0.00035811355,0.00011663757,0.00013687625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016515379,0.00017934648,0.00025514473,0.00013795662,0.0007420256,0.000050001487,0.00075427914,0.000175933,0.000008072427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007792576,0.000243613,0.00016255025,0.000029576635,0.0002291334,0.00008783267,0.00022694845,0.000407515,0.0000031188051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009124749,0.000021134741,0.000008058598,0.00013523016,0.00004504988,0.000080828475,0.010622634,0.000070546914,0.0000034617992,0.8810371,0.1067115,0.0011732181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004245716,0.000020322217,0.000025191803,0.00003289035,0.000053412245,2.5263597e-7,0.00370282,0.000020294874,0.000008395979,0.000021201602,0.99541986,0.00027077855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01145338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013566308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88870835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017746089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007481735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99512947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309241956","doi":"10.1017/9781009177856.038","title":"C. S. Holling (1973)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.043678326066941185,"score_gpt":0.24639725614594904,"score_spread":0.20271893007900785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309241956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004208517,0.00008494046,0.0001003544,0.0001496716,0.00020810588,0.0003710074,0.0002935035,0.0001778623,0.99857247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021356572,0.00030292466,0.000063049934,0.00008771077,0.00026379892,0.0000017338837,0.00004113989,0.000027972219,0.99707603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988229,0.00004810158,0.00011918055,0.00036897184,0.00037972172,0.00026107053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915063,0.000067899426,0.00015776433,0.00036514216,0.000083322135,0.00017526302],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018013561,0.00017662796,0.00020453912,0.000091796246,0.0013894645,0.00006302798,0.00067877147,0.00020104423,0.00012877602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009022256,0.00023655432,0.0001866713,0.0000120515915,0.00031302107,0.000090019035,0.0004108625,0.00049243076,0.000036247493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008034219,0.0000048624534,6.7848896e-7,0.000008950781,0.000033029097,0.000046528618,0.0002836826,0.0000038271596,0.0000051809643,0.97650003,0.022368452,0.00073671405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012937462,0.000009725504,0.0000020526873,0.00001647336,0.00008048023,8.7310525e-7,0.00022812975,0.000006599579,0.000010263494,0.000047726855,0.99920386,0.0002644639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030681232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052058997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97683537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038887735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002813127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312662675","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2022.2133266","title":"Property’s limits","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Property (philosophy); Social research; Law; Media studies; Social science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03860603894292137,"score_gpt":0.3169023672304274,"score_spread":0.27829632828750606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312662675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093593836,0.019757083,0.00053287373,0.19338588,0.010590501,0.0038623065,0.00048287536,0.0007480642,0.6770466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91616696,0.0007685195,0.00016802276,0.0013653929,0.0010492902,0.00031260677,0.000008798018,0.000020686315,0.080139704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975834,0.00027600868,0.00027660755,0.00046417923,0.00090473617,0.0004950665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999045,0.00009520758,0.00015518192,0.00043703124,0.0000714537,0.0001960863],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072166056,0.00014857046,0.00016627963,0.00004947439,0.002813105,0.00016722528,0.0011037003,0.00006069955,0.00315963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007870623,0.00012563591,0.000115329385,0.00083064503,0.00024630254,0.00018574166,0.00048419158,0.00051401637,0.0022049116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000680241,0.0014864077,0.006086259,0.00008004889,0.00013498362,0.00009276576,0.054004043,0.0008446312,0.0015776074,0.4882267,0.389061,0.058337525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011031501,0.00008160442,0.0010442946,0.000009590237,0.000035413017,0.000001491919,0.0018209358,0.00028779902,0.000076056065,0.00092419516,0.99537927,0.00022905509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021738792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017083428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027730447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055171014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313056760","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198757252.003.0007","title":"Establishing the promisor’s enrichment in Canadian law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Testamentary trust; Unjust enrichment; Context (archaeology); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Order (exchange); Common law; Relevance (law); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02966117380749673,"score_gpt":0.28291379143960493,"score_spread":0.2532526176321082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313056760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010529138,0.00009694128,9.26956e-7,0.01735547,0.00013175911,0.00052801013,0.000031184973,0.000024910914,0.9818203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0587124,0.00012195565,0.00003146921,0.0019999412,0.00023643574,0.000105172796,0.000022063645,0.000015216544,0.93875533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990514,0.000027531012,0.00014464503,0.00019272644,0.00029055678,0.0002931495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994484,0.000097255455,0.000050773473,0.00022417988,0.000021275853,0.0001580794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006495506,0.000090700254,0.00009458077,0.000052695428,0.0009842303,0.00017698272,0.0004925409,0.00009432472,0.009810153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021567188,0.00007033126,0.000049271126,0.000055061813,0.00011961529,0.00010104623,0.000090610774,0.00037927311,0.00008492692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.357102e-7,0.0000027321862,0.000017977178,0.0000011708361,0.0000036153358,0.0000027055246,0.0018760824,0.0000048286215,1.19514e-7,0.9927747,0.004633858,0.0006819783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024803232,0.0000029691428,0.000016099126,0.000004477087,0.0000046356913,1.4575998e-7,0.0004940164,0.000003381659,1.496349e-7,0.041613307,0.95773923,0.00009676981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9856148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9531054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085298234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010294504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313065913","doi":"10.47348/slr/2022/i3a4","title":"Lessons From New South Wales, Queensland, and British Columbia to Assist South Africa in Adequately Regulating the Keeping of Assistance Animals by Disabled Persons in Sectional Title Schemes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Jurisdiction; Service (business); Animal welfare; Medicine; Psychology; Business; Political science; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.05099444966079107,"score_gpt":0.3075253143093743,"score_spread":0.2565308646485832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313065913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32239735,0.25957316,0.00029720482,0.024475127,0.00026892393,0.0037717733,0.0027063093,0.00012390602,0.38638622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948154,0.000799979,0.0003177463,0.0002137404,0.00003913141,0.00006382658,0.000011740351,0.000008445546,0.0037300102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902296,0.00017292262,0.00022739994,0.00020521707,0.00021688505,0.00015462714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960214,0.000107616994,0.00009803757,0.00011986341,0.000016953629,0.000055394845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005131785,0.000051342908,0.00018733944,0.000009103082,0.00038649153,0.000089398214,0.0001660347,0.000025060066,0.0008055922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008607722,0.00006064574,0.00004137937,0.00034976518,0.00007585883,0.00003756438,0.00008976196,0.00014874425,0.000008323109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047047954,0.00044656353,0.20457089,0.001417672,0.00015911294,0.000014927522,0.058502845,0.00006449906,0.00039076232,0.46893358,0.20548254,0.05996957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014073435,0.000009003217,0.008204189,0.0005255912,0.000014776813,5.001422e-7,0.0017822114,0.00001649385,0.0000013484282,0.0010408879,0.9881492,0.00011505789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051972825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10900837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7826667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006846409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110027715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95434016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313153503","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4082380","title":"Discoverability Demystified","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Discoverability; Medicine; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.014912270113192317,"score_gpt":0.2980510363292291,"score_spread":0.2831387662160368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313153503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8782334,0.0012089012,0.008079915,0.03220012,0.00048320653,0.00037214585,0.000016948601,0.000101781785,0.07930362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917575,0.00034415865,0.000022480623,0.00014396859,0.00026813548,0.000023058172,0.0000017564869,0.000005891903,0.007433062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979643,0.00022541566,0.00013391367,0.000117162264,0.00034640645,0.0012128046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999675,0.0000466925,0.00007303611,0.000106743224,0.000028592976,0.000069985064],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030601309,0.00004798407,0.00006502448,0.000026854897,0.0026397242,0.00006246825,0.00035804615,0.000017157827,0.00039894393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006717819,0.000046486093,0.00007429515,0.0002162545,0.00006944016,0.00012785102,0.00007284729,0.0013109534,0.000021544067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007985479,0.00004717809,0.0011972397,3.0093128e-7,0.000012895497,3.5932086e-7,0.00093594217,0.0000876376,0.000043778553,0.99154836,0.00017787535,0.005940422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013127504,0.000044169046,0.00057130004,3.9929392e-7,0.000007642722,0.000018841974,0.012980188,0.000016830576,0.000004068216,0.5932835,0.39286956,0.00007224784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013040657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053949524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3982649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017389848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313644466","doi":"10.1515/npf-2022-0031","title":"Donor Advised Funds &amp; Delay: An Intergenerational Justice Solution?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nonprofit Policy Forum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Economic Justice; Independence (probability theory); Flexibility (engineering); Balance (ability); Context (archaeology); Foundation (evidence); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Management","score_opus":0.07369149747502873,"score_gpt":0.40746149455633746,"score_spread":0.3337699970813087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313644466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4547642,0.000055610944,0.010368476,0.31154796,0.0014741998,0.0012417913,0.00048385374,0.0016382623,0.21842565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638468,0.00004522795,0.0010941369,0.001965133,0.0021854548,0.00015381788,0.00020504216,0.000020765225,0.030483603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984806,0.0000839051,0.00023012515,0.00027574567,0.00033023037,0.0005993595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992011,0.000060634844,0.00007234479,0.00028646013,0.00012593366,0.0002534925],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046433276,0.000113207454,0.00010998516,0.00015633293,0.0014389834,0.00014328895,0.00035825663,0.00011430788,0.0003239535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018692578,0.00011551095,0.00008272823,0.0009171664,0.00020074686,0.0003668798,0.000118003685,0.00013256732,0.0017603775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008271475,0.00004049147,0.0007832698,0.0000069925577,0.000012986205,6.57179e-7,0.002572981,0.00010164664,0.000886922,0.9455219,0.04759374,0.002470155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020666329,0.00002710889,0.0034662292,0.0000052335413,0.00002606706,0.0000011678109,0.0016925434,0.0014504103,0.000065381646,0.016664162,0.9761943,0.00020073168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00800189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016794076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92885774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014861161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054539915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315874156","doi":"","title":"Gavin Drewry, Louis Blom-Cooper, Charles Blake, The Court of Appeal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; History; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.3124337527309165,"score_gpt":0.5575056902350184,"score_spread":0.2450719375041019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315874156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8993123,0.013474719,0.00019204452,0.00381951,0.00041271024,0.0009520585,0.000105472514,0.000054066248,0.08167709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730838,0.02389581,0.00009723875,0.00033676098,0.00041363185,0.000050198214,0.000005721411,0.000028657572,0.0020881994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710226,0.000345697,0.0007600399,0.0003350527,0.0010148685,0.00044210843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755824,0.0003836389,0.0007979924,0.00053739856,0.0004597443,0.00026301036],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018542699,0.00022065283,0.0005393558,0.00021359675,0.00138605,0.00062142056,0.003929894,0.00011944265,0.006607069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030988362,0.00016482978,0.00022953488,0.0011118919,0.00096939784,0.0011636872,0.0006831267,0.0003905332,0.00005060274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018696937,0.0014268939,0.5155811,0.00009580541,0.0005195514,0.000047245983,0.015305751,0.00030480215,0.041217018,0.02970012,0.3672438,0.028370947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004607524,0.000011376801,0.37635297,0.00016619099,0.00010344108,0.000012339038,0.0012587273,0.00004861801,0.0072088186,0.0047113267,0.60923374,0.0004316965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011325746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012601693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24198996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073289724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047225456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641641","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.23","title":"Hadley V. Baxendale: Still Crazy After All These Years? Panel Discussion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel discussion; Law; Political science; Work (physics); Engineering; Philosophy; Mechanical engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05831587978241727,"score_gpt":0.3523340298958521,"score_spread":0.29401815011343485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03236534,0.20532455,0.00022406514,0.29851288,0.00052060647,0.0051718536,0.00020789575,0.0008607333,0.45681208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9276229,0.044164427,0.00063657097,0.01207753,0.0005391518,0.00011450678,0.000013129576,0.000023122177,0.014808654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867153,0.0001450361,0.00027685397,0.00026369127,0.00032168592,0.0003212081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923944,0.000045903853,0.00009064077,0.00039620482,0.00004375451,0.0001840622],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062193203,0.00012528019,0.00023289454,0.000012760782,0.00007337956,0.00007636171,0.0003578879,0.00006774582,0.0031950723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060947557,0.00007882853,0.00013711426,0.0001914741,0.00017737545,0.00024284208,0.00009777055,0.00015234693,0.0027845083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078849,0.00026161145,0.00049885904,0.0004801583,0.000033685377,0.00001297999,0.004763726,0.0000023225912,0.000025818414,0.7717745,0.020820701,0.20131782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006573639,0.000007250712,0.0016675631,0.00050009903,0.00004273448,0.0000010023884,0.000017637505,0.0000042019765,0.000004624866,0.0006179218,0.99692494,0.00014631002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011395864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025982067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007529516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006122424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641762","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i1.1","title":"Theory and Anti-theory in the Work of Allan Farnsworth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art","score_opus":0.022100596165111,"score_gpt":0.3161855854937112,"score_spread":0.29408498932860017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047619954,0.17193957,0.00007937396,0.008103742,0.000034854726,0.0011288082,0.000008435591,0.000038701568,0.7710466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821672,0.015270598,0.000050903687,0.0018944306,0.00006348912,0.000018908313,0.0000027606104,0.000004437907,0.0005272876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988964,0.00052290683,0.00019888357,0.000109519955,0.00014127437,0.00013098797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993604,0.00032124794,0.00007941785,0.00019823095,0.000019338306,0.000021398931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029640615,0.000058285434,0.00016354202,0.000008728316,0.0001312721,0.000022810826,0.00023411967,0.000028103952,0.00012802638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049428385,0.000036921865,0.000045253037,0.00029180976,0.0002918485,0.000042799045,0.000029013092,0.00007894948,0.000023317665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.783391e-7,0.000023131652,0.0018001645,0.00008437321,0.0000019699344,5.302428e-7,0.00019277191,2.626598e-7,0.0000015196432,0.9928365,0.0004072578,0.0046505355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004339992,0.0000034684015,0.014955158,0.000376472,0.00002085783,4.676008e-7,0.000076508935,9.082229e-8,0.00000287703,0.09764892,0.8868139,0.00005791311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012162294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001329114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93454725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009145694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025426309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18385832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318773428","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v14i1.15360","title":"Contract Law’s Red Herring: Exposing “Intention” as a Guise for Consideration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Political science; Test (biology); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14382678537832502,"score_gpt":0.43763462453772106,"score_spread":0.293807839159396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318773428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050728,0.0016287958,0.0014366615,0.07162863,0.0014678981,0.0007582819,0.000014344012,0.00012838423,0.017864218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641806,0.00032910227,0.00031337768,0.0004017082,0.0005471557,0.000021413836,0.0000010745899,0.000008918987,0.0019591763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989711,0.00005885912,0.00039487815,0.000099776174,0.00027013276,0.0002052311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986926,0.00030026218,0.00030090517,0.00006758119,0.00056037033,0.0000783147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008927343,0.00007905871,0.00021470003,0.000056031673,0.0008314153,0.00019981003,0.00012868908,0.000035159384,0.000010621464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005882387,0.000066261266,0.00013816911,0.00012831956,0.00016397999,0.00041696764,0.000036798207,0.00010299858,0.000021314878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018867855,0.00014622092,0.00863017,0.0000550183,0.00060189626,0.00009223018,0.038667113,0.00019822495,0.004943382,0.92839104,0.01438674,0.0036992675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010297257,0.0002091461,0.004315451,0.00018185512,0.00009968476,0.00003074355,0.018669078,0.000028589406,0.0007618685,0.014876709,0.9596248,0.00017232331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005308661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002846519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009080948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63946587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319028512","doi":"10.35948/1590-5586/2023.232","title":"La 'certainty of objects' e il potere di nomina nei trust testamentari (Royal Trust Corporation of Canada v The Welfare Institution of the Jews of Athens, 23 agosto 2022)","year":2023,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Trusts","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.016622723002965537,"score_gpt":0.24999560793052417,"score_spread":0.23337288492755864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319028512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97705823,0.00006207078,0.00001062212,0.0047342777,0.00036493447,0.0008058112,0.00095932296,0.000014009805,0.015990732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750924,0.00007733156,0.000013742243,0.00005801978,0.00008143138,0.000026983998,0.000045069333,0.000014235244,0.0021739553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763775,0.0003206677,0.0007440347,0.00026383702,0.00073460577,0.00029909055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978208,0.00025053043,0.0010308423,0.0005759409,0.00024229403,0.00007962236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082985894,0.00019336912,0.0003860184,0.000054199114,0.0005418143,0.000023598484,0.000694216,0.00020052395,0.00018395718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025690807,0.00013377423,0.00018528219,0.0010191945,0.0009474365,0.000079876896,0.0002102146,0.00031170624,0.0000040371165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034678922,0.00079611887,0.0836475,0.00090563827,0.0004036623,0.00000951239,0.07618641,0.011607048,0.008691935,0.7865924,0.012292716,0.01852022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018504324,0.0003259224,0.7086728,0.00045855253,0.0005044089,0.000003727055,0.09299479,0.0063998457,0.010493338,0.0025732263,0.17509188,0.0006310547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6268393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54480535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78401923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028317838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015814774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5455155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321351784","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12799","title":"Ernest J.Weinrib, Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022, 240 pp, hb, £90.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reciprocal; Sociology; Law; Library science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04293725953304092,"score_gpt":0.28859468771083135,"score_spread":0.24565742817779043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321351784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012009011,0.057738207,0.0015998045,0.048723415,0.0004392295,0.0038713887,0.00035128562,0.0012816422,0.873986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3922528,0.5811269,0.00086622103,0.0043464457,0.000606844,0.00014833896,0.00021791611,0.00007870481,0.020355787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980893,0.00021106942,0.00028214883,0.00048604963,0.0004086444,0.00052278326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988946,0.000098037024,0.00014180201,0.00047633093,0.000108235654,0.00028103238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007499347,0.00019073703,0.00036308053,0.000022696213,0.0012069114,0.0001741301,0.0006307513,0.0001276562,0.00015846791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005965186,0.00017410974,0.00013098695,0.00056965655,0.0005915363,0.00058171863,0.000370642,0.00024511138,0.000075172065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028819031,0.00004469844,0.00009438371,0.00030012918,0.000018016575,0.000009580714,0.00014735393,0.000002704745,0.000007227256,0.9902245,0.0060369857,0.0031115436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001846915,0.000014187213,0.00006656721,0.00025273432,0.000051585637,0.000001932845,0.000028283666,0.00042515594,0.0000052579153,0.009173889,0.98957336,0.00022236393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044655525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065058568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98353636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010614996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010366807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9282708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321836540","doi":"10.1017/9781108782975.006","title":"Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03060379322728132,"score_gpt":0.26654101504999245,"score_spread":0.23593722182271112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321836540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018334758,0.0001113388,0.00027815276,0.00014650839,0.0007987036,0.00041833927,0.00069718703,0.00008258296,0.9972838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006396562,0.00027659885,0.000016991236,0.000117530355,0.00040805433,0.000005943837,0.00012651522,0.00001945016,0.9926323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858576,0.00022632595,0.00010619413,0.00036870476,0.00037619873,0.00033679645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999142,0.00006711626,0.00014669336,0.00038083192,0.00008144622,0.00018191345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016603972,0.00016038795,0.00020692966,0.00009879691,0.0015221146,0.00008630532,0.0009566841,0.00022623608,0.000617326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001160319,0.00021051001,0.00014947086,0.00005803653,0.00029647836,0.00007425342,0.0005432263,0.00056362775,0.00047267257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007985245,0.000011361243,0.0000017162502,0.000011028277,0.000021526781,0.000010626337,0.0002464813,0.000010417156,0.0000024466763,0.38866514,0.6107159,0.00029535036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016292158,0.00000841706,0.000013641196,0.000009140523,0.000036990183,5.102017e-7,0.001062909,0.00001075713,0.000011231429,6.276571e-7,0.99844223,0.00024063679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01761423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005877361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3886645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004743942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005860197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322391109","doi":"10.5040/9781509939107","title":"Vicarious Liability in the Common Law World","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Delict; Common law; Law; Doctrine; Strict liability; Liability; Comparative law; Political science; Private law; Public law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.04340788337571818,"score_gpt":0.3047921515746355,"score_spread":0.26138426819891736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322391109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010861231,0.000060249127,0.0000017074813,0.01085983,0.0002984407,0.0007538429,0.000085773536,0.00013485046,0.9876967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048719406,0.0000038173794,0.000036608842,0.0053518163,0.0007383294,0.00034906474,0.00014080261,0.00002939892,0.94463074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974151,0.0004783034,0.00036591952,0.00041959147,0.00091083476,0.0004102249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816996,0.00069710374,0.0001950088,0.0007697639,0.00006854642,0.00009959452],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034889597,0.00018202678,0.00026614396,0.00011112756,0.0014829935,0.0031786296,0.0019841592,0.00020723198,0.00086937577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014014551,0.00015404665,0.00015673868,0.00017593236,0.00046223213,0.00051476574,0.000404024,0.0018773506,0.00003750435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017447292,0.000022297878,0.000046337183,0.00000875351,0.000005355239,0.0000052908463,0.007723313,0.0000017392433,2.9833942e-7,0.8042498,0.186543,0.0013920615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000689431,0.0000058261685,0.00010038408,0.00001773107,0.000013816153,4.0587287e-7,0.0005564488,0.000002346589,3.8192422e-7,0.110427745,0.8886456,0.00016036625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020253606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26367527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7021026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007026517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009400071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322760559","doi":"10.1111/jols.12407","title":"<i>Lawyers and the Rule of Law</i> By AndrewBoon, Oxford: Hart, 2022, 576 pp., £90.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Flood myth; Law; Library science; Sociology; History; Political science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01624765731057248,"score_gpt":0.28784250873800804,"score_spread":0.27159485142743556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322760559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.596104,0.0063311635,0.00014180987,0.057237994,0.00039114122,0.0003794097,0.0001246623,0.000050766106,0.33923903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97751695,0.016974034,0.00019808755,0.0029093,0.00026067955,0.0000043030504,0.0000020277332,0.000007985935,0.0021266425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999177,0.00006449995,0.00024421854,0.00007955683,0.00027549436,0.00015923417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993803,0.00016595366,0.00019305394,0.00007587937,0.00008513181,0.000099662684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012398526,0.00006192318,0.00017793366,0.0000052389473,0.0006926461,0.000079903555,0.00015285097,0.00006920416,0.000026619287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017884578,0.00004044319,0.00015222696,0.00012371718,0.00084496744,0.00018141455,0.000052815754,0.00018530365,0.0000014770604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000151837785,0.00003030159,0.00022964385,0.000016272526,0.00006426244,8.917278e-7,0.024802998,0.0000032732219,0.0006316071,0.8937139,0.08012089,0.00037080687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075406674,0.000024300434,0.0001962517,0.00001379134,0.000030934876,0.0000031604638,0.006061799,0.000050137583,0.00012529144,0.009207675,0.9834746,0.000058008172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086490036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010180748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9033537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015621123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057555157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53273433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322770748","doi":"10.1017/lst.2023.1","title":"Security interests and knowing receipt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Property (philosophy); Liability; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Security interest; Law and economics; Business; Point (geometry); Law; Political science; Sociology; Accounting; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07946423820398954,"score_gpt":0.40716223397991647,"score_spread":0.32769799577592695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322770748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85391587,0.0015770239,0.0000069439566,0.028414246,0.00030850348,0.00018105794,0.000006569562,0.00030565224,0.115284145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99387395,0.0011325408,0.000024349312,0.00013451757,0.00020683922,0.000024168427,8.015792e-7,0.0000036782203,0.0045991517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994851,0.00003558464,0.00007664291,0.00012598031,0.00010663505,0.00017005812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997242,0.000110180576,0.00001898949,0.000063549305,0.000039761617,0.000043313743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028354942,0.000047184745,0.00008366721,0.00002372143,0.00067485706,0.00006118147,0.000079637044,0.000023589566,0.000010243712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020571369,0.000041178904,0.000021890613,0.0002574298,0.00019058262,0.00012619374,0.00014919997,0.00007151853,0.0000993571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050202952,0.000023976856,0.011049102,0.000034404362,0.00008722618,0.00001126747,0.082028806,0.0000034272798,0.00009171216,0.8395264,0.048194587,0.018944066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051891384,0.00000773912,0.007470686,0.000014642123,0.000005993945,2.1657335e-7,0.014567954,0.000014207546,0.000026000067,0.009899303,0.96787554,0.00006583411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013609803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061241356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91968095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030613995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000179909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5190523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323025880","doi":"10.21638/spbu25.2023.104","title":"The doctrine of error in the law of Louisiana and Quebec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pravovedenie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Legal doctrine; Political science; State (computer science); Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Causality (physics); Comparative law; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.054849404230054764,"score_gpt":0.3708404663097672,"score_spread":0.31599106207971245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323025880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8102457,0.00037118007,0.000010208541,0.043320023,0.00004811725,0.0003778017,0.000012411885,0.000022063985,0.14559251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981932,0.00011779178,0.0000152333105,0.00007116506,0.000029214525,0.000013086837,8.145189e-7,0.0000019253887,0.0015575457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948436,0.000071881004,0.000119323624,0.000060846178,0.00015803425,0.000105551066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994294,0.00034209393,0.000053865493,0.00013534125,0.000023108378,0.000016189393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076848414,0.000028269824,0.000055424123,0.000013802072,0.00020026202,0.000026810048,0.00022672332,0.000021167465,0.00001053404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009781433,0.000016164764,0.00002049969,0.0003220087,0.00030166854,0.00004264502,0.00004214847,0.000055626202,0.000007828284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028369332,0.000012804003,0.0016045955,0.0000048971624,0.0000032998896,4.382063e-7,0.006189771,0.0000022414667,0.00019167978,0.9895181,0.0005455073,0.0019238042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000197936,0.000017511738,0.08866446,0.000012183735,0.000010097483,3.5354586e-7,0.016147813,0.000063234475,0.00037491004,0.023418872,0.87102914,0.000063466934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079545036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32723445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96609926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008538028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005046012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92658436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323025925","doi":"10.21638/spbu25.2023.102","title":"Trusts in mixed jurisdictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pravovedenie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; English law; Trust law; Legislation; Convention; Norm (philosophy); Arbitration; Common law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.0462034789168687,"score_gpt":0.3730527508201265,"score_spread":0.3268492719032578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323025925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5563472,0.00004705151,0.000113108195,0.020305067,0.000336474,0.00029792544,0.000015978854,0.0004052279,0.422132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972946,0.00010335163,0.00009792839,0.00007523689,0.00013492367,0.000062863575,0.000006610252,0.0000062205563,0.009783388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993192,0.00005325385,0.000109270055,0.000129574,0.00016078228,0.00022792332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967366,0.00009149533,0.000023855626,0.00012245055,0.000020461477,0.00006807248],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003743601,0.000041694384,0.000058001813,0.00008246801,0.00031803534,0.000050415867,0.00015656788,0.00005018211,0.00016511246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012375414,0.000043697648,0.000032009022,0.0008239142,0.00006698624,0.00010836414,0.000040321698,0.000094855626,0.0012097263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058970886,0.00013394728,0.03297914,0.000008194968,0.0000131159895,0.000015811858,0.019790513,0.00010524598,0.0010333469,0.90450007,0.023287544,0.01812719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112943155,0.0000036318893,0.12745523,0.000003970248,0.0000028161608,1.873581e-7,0.0014298218,0.00012639575,0.00005071247,0.0076761316,0.8630701,0.000068056324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023609865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00989349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89682394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005354797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010204046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323306658","doi":"10.32920/22223320","title":"Aboriginal Title in Tsilhqot’in: Exploring the Public Power of Private Property at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Law; Political science; High Court; Power (physics); Private property; Property rights","score_opus":0.0885969842385872,"score_gpt":0.3223243740019781,"score_spread":0.2337273897633909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323306658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4877466,0.00007923357,0.000016100188,0.08013522,0.0008540645,0.00082048256,0.000049598933,0.000025019197,0.43027368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96079594,0.000150066,0.000023395794,0.00006640699,0.000048770933,0.00008798292,0.0000022887036,0.0000066377593,0.0388185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922854,0.000049273385,0.000172656,0.00012013881,0.00027932407,0.0001500804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995228,0.00006852149,0.00007009622,0.00026462937,0.00004979005,0.000024186887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053720747,0.000054357188,0.000098879806,0.000023974835,0.00008242977,0.000019307883,0.0004476315,0.00003615329,0.00073085405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003865801,0.00002600804,0.000029092807,0.00020162339,0.000107787346,0.000037883103,0.00017328662,0.00017792475,0.000022133288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009040566,0.0000910513,0.017676841,0.000095787254,0.000044788165,0.00000570187,0.014606078,0.0004123169,0.00014132557,0.794357,0.1719852,0.0005748823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002951645,0.0000016799146,0.006892856,0.000020542291,0.0000020829666,6.842731e-8,0.00091245223,0.00004005193,0.00012236832,0.0011733905,0.9907534,0.000051568935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68481773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9369118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8187682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001889679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010521122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8002339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323306752","doi":"10.32920/22223320.v1","title":"Aboriginal Title in Tsilhqot’in: Exploring the Public Power of Private Property at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Law; Political science; High Court; Power (physics); Property rights; Private property; Indigenous rights; Human rights","score_opus":0.0885969842385872,"score_gpt":0.3223243740019781,"score_spread":0.2337273897633909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323306752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4877466,0.00007923357,0.000016100188,0.08013522,0.0008540645,0.00082048256,0.000049598933,0.000025019197,0.43027368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96079594,0.000150066,0.000023395794,0.00006640699,0.000048770933,0.00008798292,0.0000022887036,0.0000066377593,0.0388185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922854,0.000049273385,0.000172656,0.00012013881,0.00027932407,0.0001500804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995228,0.00006852149,0.00007009622,0.00026462937,0.00004979005,0.000024186887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053720747,0.000054357188,0.000098879806,0.000023974835,0.00008242977,0.000019307883,0.0004476315,0.00003615329,0.00073085405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003865801,0.00002600804,0.000029092807,0.00020162339,0.000107787346,0.000037883103,0.00017328662,0.00017792475,0.000022133288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009040566,0.0000910513,0.017676841,0.000095787254,0.000044788165,0.00000570187,0.014606078,0.0004123169,0.00014132557,0.794357,0.1719852,0.0005748823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002951645,0.0000016799146,0.006892856,0.000020542291,0.0000020829666,6.842731e-8,0.00091245223,0.00004005193,0.00012236832,0.0011733905,0.9907534,0.000051568935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68481773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9369118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8187682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001889679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010521122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8002339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323340247","doi":"10.7202/1096892ar","title":"Guillaume Tusseau, Droit comparé et théorie générale du droit. Notes sur quelques allers-retours aporétiques, Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval, 2021, 104 p., ISBN : 978-2-7637-5541-0.","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013128318328246317,"score_gpt":0.24827287534273546,"score_spread":0.23514455701448914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323340247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6068524,0.0121121835,0.003953819,0.26125035,0.0013632517,0.0014444316,0.00067901745,0.0011512325,0.111193314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8296937,0.06075353,0.0011821092,0.0019924848,0.0014793926,0.00012298186,0.0003309534,0.00016771737,0.10427716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950876,0.00059355,0.0007001512,0.0010224442,0.0008445218,0.0017516861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996155,0.0013045998,0.00045765526,0.00088693015,0.00034608864,0.0008497183],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001508484,0.0005986184,0.0008165009,0.0002572855,0.0015238727,0.00047161707,0.0015878805,0.00092017144,0.0025716631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065121416,0.0007794516,0.0005356828,0.0014921927,0.0016858842,0.00082407444,0.00038440627,0.0012193529,0.000916451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080393576,0.00042968485,0.020729136,0.00025700915,0.00047258698,0.00028240297,0.038616724,0.0022997614,0.00083279563,0.3386153,0.58895236,0.008431819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008273167,0.00013810024,0.01881533,0.0002604646,0.00033661418,0.000036164998,0.011527938,0.0028987974,0.0010225549,0.0960449,0.8668672,0.0012246311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3166935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17559497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27791482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031817756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018359206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323351803","doi":"10.32920/22227955","title":"Ought from is: Towards Truly Reasonable Expectations of Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Tort; Law; Political science; Right to privacy; Information privacy; Normative; Privacy laws of the United States; Expectation of privacy; Privacy policy; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.10755283223475445,"score_gpt":0.3853090370057704,"score_spread":0.2777562047710159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323351803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10065686,0.00073087314,0.0062852884,0.07338435,0.0011814855,0.0016786975,0.0018201052,0.0009695456,0.8132928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154966,0.0006830524,0.012384515,0.0001625309,0.00067102636,0.0003363799,0.00020907304,0.000033305183,0.0700235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984827,0.0000698109,0.00033660737,0.00042161907,0.00045617577,0.00023305713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875283,0.00014443728,0.0002012839,0.00059777393,0.00018794897,0.0001157347],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022795142,0.00013461427,0.00025289954,0.0000621068,0.00028435705,0.00011480594,0.00074730004,0.000237384,0.0014010206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022419858,0.00012977842,0.00017870907,0.00029062008,0.00014056396,0.00009268407,0.00059998606,0.00025273612,0.0004000347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010338091,0.00029824767,0.0016008705,0.000085601496,0.0002750702,0.000003246839,0.18656857,0.00011800258,0.00017332882,0.6399249,0.15975447,0.011187352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017293592,0.000009664918,0.0060119457,0.00010556362,0.000080254766,5.3889497e-8,0.029917868,0.00029138807,0.0010302544,0.23494267,0.7270525,0.00038491175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08626238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004236523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8148398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001005532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081528095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323352385","doi":"10.32920/22227955.v1","title":"Ought from is: Towards Truly Reasonable Expectations of Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy law; Tort; Law; Political science; Information privacy; Right to privacy; Normative; Privacy laws of the United States; Expectation of privacy; Privacy policy; Law and economics; Supreme court; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.10755283223475445,"score_gpt":0.3853090370057704,"score_spread":0.2777562047710159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323352385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10065686,0.00073087314,0.0062852884,0.07338435,0.0011814855,0.0016786975,0.0018201052,0.0009695456,0.8132928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9154966,0.0006830524,0.012384515,0.0001625309,0.00067102636,0.0003363799,0.00020907304,0.000033305183,0.0700235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984827,0.0000698109,0.00033660737,0.00042161907,0.00045617577,0.00023305713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875283,0.00014443728,0.0002012839,0.00059777393,0.00018794897,0.0001157347],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022795142,0.00013461427,0.00025289954,0.0000621068,0.00028435705,0.00011480594,0.00074730004,0.000237384,0.0014010206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022419858,0.00012977842,0.00017870907,0.00029062008,0.00014056396,0.00009268407,0.00059998606,0.00025273612,0.0004000347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010338091,0.00029824767,0.0016008705,0.000085601496,0.0002750702,0.000003246839,0.18656857,0.00011800258,0.00017332882,0.6399249,0.15975447,0.011187352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017293592,0.000009664918,0.0060119457,0.00010556362,0.000080254766,5.3889497e-8,0.029917868,0.00029138807,0.0010302544,0.23494267,0.7270525,0.00038491175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08626238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004236523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8148398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001005532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081528095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323355929","doi":"10.32920/22227448.v1","title":"Deconstructing Directness: A Critical Evaluation of the Role of Directness in the Canadian Tort of Battery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Battery (electricity); Economic Justice; Element (criminal law); Cause of action; Law and economics; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.11100872032632854,"score_gpt":0.40803081893197174,"score_spread":0.2970220986056432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323355929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81346834,0.000118547956,0.000018672916,0.005640758,0.00035173213,0.0008799338,0.00007974853,0.000014519227,0.17942776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959385,0.000009896269,0.00010381956,0.00003073229,0.00006976428,0.00011728994,0.0000037922823,0.0000064904684,0.00006436208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800164,0.0005304912,0.00039414284,0.00018392835,0.0007108134,0.00017900186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835896,0.00063544104,0.00017809508,0.00038136946,0.00040217396,0.00004393644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037599576,0.000078333454,0.00019923499,0.000083044506,0.0002110088,0.00003199276,0.0006634716,0.00014775172,0.0001121654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014941896,0.00005214083,0.00010491409,0.00038219616,0.0004603935,0.00004074986,0.00017619618,0.00022638768,0.0000014134318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046694477,0.00012893204,0.26847175,0.00021307291,0.00006582833,4.6749489e-7,0.043995254,0.0014335676,0.00031197333,0.64593947,0.00017617819,0.039258823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034241052,0.0000143384,0.5750856,0.00088198186,0.00042241847,0.0000014650656,0.094947726,0.010338812,0.004816253,0.30549482,0.0071305716,0.0005236328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7875129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94123006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34044468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017507053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002379665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42214236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323356334","doi":"10.32920/22227448","title":"Deconstructing Directness: A Critical Evaluation of the Role of Directness in the Canadian Tort of Battery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort; Battery (electricity); Economic Justice; Cause of action; Action (physics); Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.11100872032632854,"score_gpt":0.40803081893197174,"score_spread":0.2970220986056432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323356334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81346834,0.000118547956,0.000018672916,0.005640758,0.00035173213,0.0008799338,0.00007974853,0.000014519227,0.17942776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959385,0.000009896269,0.00010381956,0.00003073229,0.00006976428,0.00011728994,0.0000037922823,0.0000064904684,0.00006436208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800164,0.0005304912,0.00039414284,0.00018392835,0.0007108134,0.00017900186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835896,0.00063544104,0.00017809508,0.00038136946,0.00040217396,0.00004393644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037599576,0.000078333454,0.00019923499,0.000083044506,0.0002110088,0.00003199276,0.0006634716,0.00014775172,0.0001121654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014941896,0.00005214083,0.00010491409,0.00038219616,0.0004603935,0.00004074986,0.00017619618,0.00022638768,0.0000014134318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046694477,0.00012893204,0.26847175,0.00021307291,0.00006582833,4.6749489e-7,0.043995254,0.0014335676,0.00031197333,0.64593947,0.00017617819,0.039258823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034241052,0.0000143384,0.5750856,0.00088198186,0.00042241847,0.0000014650656,0.094947726,0.010338812,0.004816253,0.30549482,0.0071305716,0.0005236328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7875129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94123006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34044468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017507053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002379665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42214236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4328030726","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552191.002.0004","title":"Preface","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TypeScript; Law; Section (typography); Argument (complex analysis); Jurisprudence; Art history; Library science; Sociology; Classics; History; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.056408614638353526,"score_gpt":0.30761552589141555,"score_spread":0.25120691125306205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4328030726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000027204212,0.00015156738,0.00005323906,0.0018888203,0.00005438875,0.00015741342,0.000008722736,0.00009874167,0.9975844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015646894,0.0016142478,0.0002307963,0.00022387941,0.00034316938,0.00000522221,0.000005280834,0.000011198057,0.99600154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994883,0.0000037584807,0.000082326595,0.00013319137,0.00018905068,0.00010335337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967605,0.000023494675,0.00004142183,0.00015050815,0.0000381558,0.00007039508],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000053106414,0.000069113026,0.00008005297,0.000016460155,0.0003241004,0.000021768652,0.00017351688,0.00015349351,0.00448987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064952733,0.000063042135,0.00006234574,0.000010306112,0.00015299635,0.000033735458,0.000033422166,0.00011639846,0.002150904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7845453e-7,0.0000019115425,8.555704e-7,7.5616265e-7,0.000003856837,7.40602e-7,0.00045219943,2.046141e-7,3.313987e-7,0.9209578,0.076618634,0.0019625302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001545393,0.0000023226376,0.000005399899,0.0000044875687,0.0000042374886,2.826355e-7,0.000022844953,4.8208733e-7,0.0000013406209,0.011777488,0.9880781,0.00008756372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006944847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012466013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91145945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047101486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015438252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43373775","doi":"","title":"Government contracts and the fettering of discretion - a question of validity","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SA Publiekreg = SA Public Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Commit; Obligation; Public interest; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Private rights; Freedom of contract; Flexibility (engineering); Law; Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03038227050639788,"score_gpt":0.28817381392689484,"score_spread":0.257791543420497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43373775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.592915,0.0002658138,0.014227014,0.1528913,0.00037258395,0.001420812,0.00013314103,0.0001333566,0.237641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990711,0.00007381284,0.0002980357,0.0002779262,0.00008675,0.0000397901,0.000007023688,0.0000060307925,0.00013953607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986454,0.00015822926,0.000269858,0.00016061334,0.00055212097,0.00021375869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991791,0.00014103735,0.00024373794,0.00022194163,0.00011952454,0.00009462253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016747665,0.000079487836,0.00016412702,0.000018335739,0.0003400498,0.00017742607,0.00024231238,0.00007069567,0.00006886057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027710685,0.000056550132,0.00006242827,0.00022181873,0.00090755627,0.00064296334,0.000070823786,0.00010582858,0.000002061168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001161207,0.00006489633,0.00035339576,0.000010488856,0.00001202551,1.4861799e-7,0.0012151736,0.000011706523,0.00017798318,0.99499875,0.000035240315,0.0031085825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060770996,0.00015344682,0.06585177,0.000099752855,0.000114960065,0.0000054765183,0.0050866953,0.00021180818,0.003957999,0.25864872,0.6592688,0.0005234495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077611892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038059494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001538054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013822057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360779098","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-25218-1_3","title":"Property Meeting the Challenge of the Commons in Common Law Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Statutory law; Political science; Common law; Law; Politics; Property law; House of Commons; Property rights; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06806328203593921,"score_gpt":0.2926965094875807,"score_spread":0.2246332274516415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360779098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033733618,0.00025334154,1.7358815e-7,0.022300197,0.0003492269,0.00053692766,0.000057820977,0.000025876978,0.9761391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7156861,0.00005948735,0.0000025859895,0.0002173494,0.00010633893,0.000028344126,0.000005912624,0.000017955857,0.28387597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987121,0.000099182296,0.00032734833,0.00018241363,0.0004479055,0.00023102142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989203,0.00023975549,0.00021905557,0.0005107649,0.00006108547,0.000048987346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042071496,0.00014178366,0.00028468893,0.00001669496,0.0006662417,0.000038361424,0.0009387318,0.00011537612,0.000037367805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012187586,0.00007293333,0.0000879196,0.000095427604,0.0004529277,0.000025447986,0.00023670835,0.0005714387,0.000021821486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015376454,0.000009621269,0.00009481571,0.000010167971,0.00001183862,0.0000018162469,0.0012575535,0.000045100114,9.626581e-7,0.979902,0.018540224,0.00012433439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005139302,0.000004427642,0.00031668274,0.00014189858,0.000013004163,1.9475999e-7,0.00028598815,0.00006487045,0.000003815074,0.033997014,0.965006,0.000114703056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88041615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016471278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065982714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51242596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362229","doi":"10.1139/o74-018","title":"References to the Holocaust in English Law Reports","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Biochemistry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Holocaust; German; History; Law; Classics; Art history; Religious studies; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018772082072001574,"score_gpt":0.27064557405684575,"score_spread":0.25187349198484416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8777967,0.00018884565,0.000015225878,0.034041755,0.0002806666,0.00006412156,0.0000133390695,0.000004636212,0.0875947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755263,0.000012946127,0.000037419115,0.00037805113,0.0005064722,0.000002597716,2.4877616e-7,0.000002630806,0.0015070073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994103,0.000021238251,0.00018943877,0.00007604245,0.000119428485,0.00018359389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991696,0.00004007773,0.000097883734,0.00013731401,0.0001543886,0.00040075992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005552567,0.000039175753,0.0000624086,0.00002662349,0.00019192783,0.000056855955,0.00026123872,0.000052315856,0.0001119065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045968083,0.000023107548,0.00003145537,0.00015530063,0.00016997475,0.000060974206,0.000008222161,0.0000926068,0.000006353292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035720062,0.00012485581,0.14864185,0.00004546321,0.00012486608,0.0020403895,0.0734395,0.000057669902,0.04637528,0.2828967,0.3883691,0.057848614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005010675,0.000007735011,0.0009012788,0.00005742522,0.000003300649,0.000015578791,0.003205176,4.8774993e-8,0.007328019,0.00096396275,0.9874052,0.00006216892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026403388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2841421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5990361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016847598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012747216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9800799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365393008","doi":"10.7202/1098444ar","title":"The Limits of the Declaratory Judgment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Statute; Summary judgment; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04791834975192315,"score_gpt":0.3076115822506873,"score_spread":0.25969323249876414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365393008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039049268,0.00042001196,0.00001293698,0.036407124,0.0009355911,0.0002400183,0.000039121787,0.000015083248,0.9228808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855447,0.00006211721,0.00002135381,0.00044487536,0.00010149866,0.000012971056,8.5409944e-8,0.0000030951971,0.00079955766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990835,0.00020701051,0.00013074177,0.000045856395,0.00040005328,0.00013283652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995882,0.00007675222,0.00011762709,0.0001249796,0.000045100154,0.00004732271],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009187596,0.00002918408,0.00003851269,0.0000053802655,0.019214133,0.000035826943,0.0004874475,0.000011218498,0.00014308044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026551672,0.000016264821,0.000074030686,0.00012717077,0.00016069303,0.000041503285,0.000105362065,0.00024613767,0.00000460901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021258668,0.000021724605,0.000110746645,2.8900482e-7,0.000007106271,4.1642005e-7,0.00032947434,0.00008601688,0.00006358269,0.99609,0.0012445961,0.0020439508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005522061,0.000010099853,0.00047741676,0.0000013917235,0.0000053747103,0.0000045984166,0.0016754633,0.000005453679,0.00023337519,0.0037065574,0.99380106,0.000024004521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006518442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007199859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99255645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106919695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032879314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366384703","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.0025.016","title":"Incomplete Successes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.33232416739307524,"score_gpt":0.43096074881282304,"score_spread":0.09863658141974779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366384703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6029388,0.0009946726,0.0011956607,0.0069670025,0.0011007229,0.0021257775,0.00001313089,0.00004738749,0.38461685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637544,0.0000103823895,0.0032018626,0.00006132245,0.00022855106,0.000029389705,0.0000020695666,0.0000043027117,0.00008666368],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914896,0.00013394446,0.00019556073,0.000055821696,0.0002890549,0.00017665974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998673,0.000019641997,0.00016662064,0.00007430092,0.0006974698,0.00036894222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016958143,0.00003990121,0.00006560461,0.000112085065,0.000351639,0.000084250205,0.0002212138,0.000039191393,0.0011450918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030717975,0.000037489863,0.00004584786,0.00024675962,0.00013664938,0.0002558766,0.0000035624462,0.00008596962,0.000027821065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005199137,0.00005676416,0.023922123,0.0000053176586,0.000030350053,0.000008537526,0.02153683,0.000016843174,0.000019116556,0.16050515,0.0018890437,0.7920047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022936372,0.00011804596,0.06261388,0.000021485952,0.00006734691,0.000006368382,0.0025679779,0.00013821045,0.000054865184,0.02309301,0.9109842,0.00010520465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059427153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34509408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90909517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029450392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367046972","doi":"10.1017/9781009246361.005","title":"Examining Vicarious Liability Comparatively","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Tort; Doctrine; Joint and several liability; Supreme court; Liability; Strict liability; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10907510826574691,"score_gpt":0.27791649607771834,"score_spread":0.16884138781197144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367046972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003371306,0.000018696226,0.00017485168,0.000092148905,0.00017927813,0.00052573247,0.0003527274,0.00039210392,0.9979273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009698214,0.00007355663,0.000072451694,0.000041312098,0.0002110886,0.0000020064901,0.00004063313,0.00003150931,0.98982924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985631,0.0000802664,0.00017458045,0.00050567306,0.00036290634,0.0003134754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987289,0.0002276611,0.00019372601,0.00043538614,0.000192399,0.00022197982],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028657218,0.00023042511,0.00032411868,0.00009035393,0.00089589425,0.00008595944,0.0006389918,0.00033406902,0.000013290338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029643368,0.0002862109,0.00014517622,0.000020678373,0.0007010361,0.00008633552,0.000363668,0.00045869735,0.00013034053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010659365,0.0000064166225,0.0000075901276,0.000015524296,0.00004767131,0.000032871518,0.00078039226,0.0000029429232,0.000006275215,0.9821237,0.016406767,0.00055922335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015278748,0.000015541777,0.00013125213,0.000046044497,0.00008227829,4.2363305e-7,0.0004884588,0.000018114164,0.000010459729,0.00009925461,0.99865377,0.00030164287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002694406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.982247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003446594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032314524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367843815","doi":"10.1017/s0022109023000613","title":"Public Disclosure and Consumer Financial Protection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Public access; Content (measure theory); Finance; Internet privacy; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.09284960279841117,"score_gpt":0.3435394255135999,"score_spread":0.2506898227151887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367843815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986394,0.00046204493,0.003936559,0.008264865,0.00007363737,0.00010853871,0.00001913899,0.0000141702585,0.00072702975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796486,0.0011178734,0.00032669585,0.00006670328,0.00015178612,0.000006610849,0.00000198099,0.0000031569339,0.00036034675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991005,0.00011720614,0.00026611105,0.00011681579,0.00023633162,0.00016302707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991707,0.00010707517,0.00025192145,0.000049344126,0.0003078732,0.00011305853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094497134,0.00006919779,0.00024036414,0.0003548987,0.00059926475,0.00009968904,0.00007862831,0.00006678451,0.000022809927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010354451,0.00005553247,0.00013401864,0.0018933321,0.0002467297,0.00031620727,0.00002835764,0.00015273901,0.000008103118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075541655,0.00010427386,0.10227255,0.000025538271,0.00038262078,0.000023818257,0.011555482,0.000036931517,0.00059741805,0.83671594,0.0022893234,0.045920588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040848542,0.00020471348,0.7475175,0.000022662307,0.0006279827,0.0000044028543,0.002551387,0.0005533588,0.000025241341,0.023534402,0.22434302,0.00020683312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051705854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003035588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8131815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021163713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020661138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46091205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058606","doi":"10.7202/1098593ar","title":"Actions collectives et tribunaux administratifs : un vide juridictionnel à combler","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07040641311657626,"score_gpt":0.34513133532927864,"score_spread":0.2747249222127024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007271637,0.0011261934,0.00057111983,0.12419528,0.0035823253,0.00038614747,0.001211726,0.00007991033,0.86157566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97777295,0.00069098163,0.0005492455,0.0013493337,0.000630632,0.000101387624,0.000012324401,0.000026173188,0.01886695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971781,0.0009011429,0.0004774021,0.0002807809,0.00066084805,0.0005017594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986333,0.0002534874,0.0003397368,0.00019825948,0.00019617332,0.00037899482],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225917,0.00018582631,0.0002278199,0.0000700722,0.032319512,0.00025556723,0.00042857614,0.000093073606,0.008522225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061924875,0.00020455619,0.0002644365,0.0009317899,0.00039900574,0.00058290723,0.00016893669,0.0012971255,0.00011666221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027934377,0.00061184284,0.000036229565,0.0000042431902,0.00011023853,0.000023502444,0.0015165748,0.0010495798,0.00004542745,0.98543733,0.008263066,0.002874057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005491666,0.00021739911,0.0004901406,0.0000136696435,0.00009399079,0.00033719878,0.00724852,0.00016035626,0.0001298766,0.021619696,0.9689149,0.00022507369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00373178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016032547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97050136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087565905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026868132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99238414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239638","doi":"10.1515/9780773569195-010","title":"Adult Guardianship Leigislation in British Columbia: Reform and Restructuring through CommunityParticipation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Restructuring; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.032919119475191536,"score_gpt":0.25255847060674097,"score_spread":0.21963935113154942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004404153,0.0000020741884,0.000014422721,0.00028387498,0.00005471555,0.0005586548,0.00018303395,0.000106304535,0.99439275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25369796,0.00074088253,0.00019419493,0.00008808176,0.00008955773,0.0000049525565,0.000061980936,0.000029837574,0.7450925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987076,0.00011884923,0.00023731799,0.00034083813,0.0002937785,0.00030163766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910635,0.000075029,0.00021295814,0.00032741102,0.00016792952,0.0001103233],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018919489,0.00015128533,0.00026464692,0.000062077765,0.0014095675,0.00021274349,0.00031053455,0.00042197347,0.000033243632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025114792,0.0002704269,0.0000758844,0.00003053276,0.00035596656,0.00033726514,0.00023371784,0.00054572144,0.0000031798836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011583302,0.000010003182,0.00030721913,0.000031132764,0.000024002684,0.000036501315,0.0013786671,0.000008177652,6.8520285e-7,0.9951427,0.00022315091,0.0028261964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041798706,0.000019054574,0.0018560917,0.0001992042,0.00006441438,0.0000015986925,0.0010497204,0.00000780829,0.000004440578,0.0154227335,0.9806344,0.000322574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6422594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10368242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98041123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073207065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000707166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377240802","doi":"10.1515/9780228009115","title":"Royally Wronged","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.02105668725874571,"score_gpt":0.24332809128448976,"score_spread":0.22227140402574405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377240802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004540615,0.0000035303633,0.000056052046,0.0006939572,0.0002060913,0.00050395296,0.00047364656,0.0002671065,0.9977911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00050260534,0.00017552814,0.00023965006,0.00018502622,0.00032742723,0.0000038572584,0.00010406927,0.00004031993,0.9984215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978654,0.00022816597,0.00020547345,0.0006279801,0.00058401533,0.00048899103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983966,0.00013758935,0.00023449583,0.00060917344,0.00030200148,0.00032015488],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002125333,0.00030590565,0.00039348993,0.00010683189,0.0018666588,0.00011512535,0.0009194194,0.0005818914,0.0002024951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003220679,0.00037712872,0.00029853804,0.00004397405,0.0003836408,0.00012285107,0.0005669701,0.0006278418,0.000053241693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011269705,0.000023684728,0.0000014302082,0.00003168971,0.00008875699,0.00009765692,0.000502341,0.0000068776567,0.0000024224896,0.94796866,0.05036927,0.0008959356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026803467,0.000014554902,0.0000085673,0.000081980805,0.00015325418,3.3493e-7,0.00038451704,0.0000024380731,0.000036467165,0.0007949023,0.9978286,0.00042634702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076853964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055995006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94745934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087109226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377252422","doi":"10.1515/9780773552319","title":"Common Sense and Legal Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common sense; Sense (electronics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.024747966256863298,"score_gpt":0.2594939537725436,"score_spread":0.2347459875156803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377252422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046555473,0.0000022961183,0.000010336111,0.0008532427,0.00013874055,0.0005619965,0.00048697888,0.00014113462,0.99775875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055570677,0.00024418876,0.0000767998,0.00013248665,0.00020203016,0.0000025290017,0.000033625834,0.000026057256,0.99372524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984663,0.00013386238,0.0001538842,0.00048004952,0.00039551995,0.00037037057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985844,0.000094788855,0.00029272254,0.0006272519,0.000110593784,0.00029025957],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002131244,0.00026580287,0.00035522672,0.000087388915,0.0029035944,0.0001903183,0.00046627768,0.00040579666,0.000019455496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014263007,0.00030837738,0.00014149798,0.000009913314,0.00067479216,0.00018891234,0.0006256005,0.00047627775,0.000016537433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019878622,0.000016130145,0.000002639878,0.000031761483,0.000058558137,0.00017536253,0.00031960857,0.0000013366862,0.0000016528107,0.9765307,0.02171955,0.0011228547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030997593,0.000022168657,0.00002192567,0.000076217904,0.0001379041,0.000001853125,0.00016448245,0.0000035587389,0.000024584371,0.0008107327,0.9980796,0.0003469713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02299426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000889002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004648105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024290378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377964707","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_233","title":"Great Enrichment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06713823327403196,"score_gpt":0.3252193116646869,"score_spread":0.25808107839065497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377964707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010001829,0.000027888409,0.00004053508,0.0038268631,0.00015819482,0.00019279018,0.00001591197,0.00023174947,0.9955051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005090244,0.0005188826,0.00007482138,0.00022199098,0.0004512869,0.00001621802,0.0000141542705,0.000018376866,0.99817526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932766,0.000004533846,0.000103721344,0.00017031979,0.000257201,0.00013657931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999624,0.000045958794,0.000041950112,0.0001694371,0.000036457746,0.00008221162],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013336225,0.000083030274,0.00009450471,0.00003326351,0.0002708878,0.000047755057,0.00018576326,0.00014517443,0.004872966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000082809665,0.0000738316,0.000077896184,0.00002439173,0.00008853477,0.00002563319,0.000064731845,0.000107650485,0.0076796534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.834588e-7,0.0000013974704,0.0000020455118,0.0000015809607,0.000008228609,0.0000014200583,0.00021979805,2.1533253e-7,3.268042e-7,0.9573516,0.038911574,0.0035016101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016666298,0.0000030462807,0.000009766409,0.0000070618435,0.000009422162,5.176095e-8,0.000047934664,7.089454e-7,5.4823767e-7,0.1144235,0.88539374,0.00008752931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011483233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031553505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8464822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007827234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010137517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378445419","doi":"10.1515/9780773587946","title":"The Guardianship of Best Interests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.033699502995405695,"score_gpt":0.26568566389934345,"score_spread":0.23198616090393775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378445419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013203168,0.000006725759,0.000019861824,0.00048613927,0.00022523303,0.0004903789,0.00034886197,0.000069783404,0.99833983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01249126,0.00024927122,0.000041999807,0.00003684557,0.00026334982,0.0000030494812,0.00001602533,0.000024717405,0.9868735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984486,0.00021506673,0.00021094097,0.00027820005,0.00042178945,0.00042536395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983429,0.0003418486,0.0003262495,0.00057044043,0.00020868827,0.00020990656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036262075,0.00021522868,0.00027868428,0.00007366008,0.0015358514,0.000051180512,0.001114541,0.0003640959,0.000026964704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037599995,0.00019605766,0.00024758067,0.000031122967,0.00079287356,0.00011781172,0.00044237357,0.00046073363,0.00003886133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017454908,0.00001919109,0.00000877771,0.00002751153,0.00007302129,0.0000044007925,0.0007559176,9.60188e-7,0.0000014493006,0.9809488,0.01612489,0.0020176112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013692072,0.000017350982,0.000020098843,0.000076647266,0.0001429008,1.9796683e-7,0.00061602093,4.794801e-7,0.00004418507,0.0011369713,0.9975943,0.00021394617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079164235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007130443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039604324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002799481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379141157","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2023.2214484","title":"Humility as a necessary virtue in common-law decision making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Virtue; Law; Morality; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial opinion; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.031222652284411245,"score_gpt":0.4053084581974671,"score_spread":0.37408580591305585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379141157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91050255,0.00005958565,0.00031047533,0.0030613362,0.00015548717,0.00026500697,0.0000075161383,0.00019050618,0.085447505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985358,0.000084379135,0.00028491975,0.0005313195,0.000101952624,0.000048694204,0.0000022197,0.0000071459012,0.0004035584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987368,0.00009456152,0.00022109557,0.00026370047,0.00039742683,0.00028643655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991172,0.0004339603,0.00005226002,0.0002853705,0.000033754433,0.0000774438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095634157,0.00007438788,0.00012216861,0.00006264982,0.000523623,0.000098619304,0.00049089117,0.000086593645,0.0000943023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013776666,0.00007523275,0.000044496508,0.00097913,0.00019510598,0.0002752091,0.00018630533,0.00018311797,0.0009033275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019541661,0.00008055638,0.025035817,0.000010259978,0.0000028810969,0.000038432274,0.004379183,0.00016890341,0.00020416788,0.943297,0.0023639349,0.024399301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029627405,0.000041837506,0.21733709,0.00021878316,0.0000073347865,0.0000017084118,0.0035224655,0.0012823013,0.00024294319,0.51953083,0.2571395,0.000378932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007130484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020950586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4237662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010138572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011176217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380090767","doi":"10.1093/jrls/jlad007","title":"The Elusive Third Way? The Role of Positive Morality in <i>Recognizing Wrongs</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.0414097305603416,"score_gpt":0.3832651918561435,"score_spread":0.3418554612958019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380090767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07092316,0.63091934,0.000002854386,0.13233843,0.000317202,0.0028074582,0.00012544503,0.00009704739,0.16246909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66570807,0.33304656,0.000025824418,0.00042060282,0.00010475008,0.00015480546,0.0000029023106,0.0000065445834,0.00052997464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983626,0.0003464335,0.0004827177,0.00016390868,0.00038256202,0.00026177015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980941,0.0010450302,0.0002978536,0.00023940414,0.00029470032,0.000028929242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00263707,0.00010258068,0.00036111148,0.000021345864,0.0007001146,0.000023777995,0.00043276174,0.000028475524,0.0000053697627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091825495,0.000055536133,0.00015085499,0.000904994,0.0006665362,0.00012253434,0.00026325413,0.0001602782,0.000027984075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017964268,0.00010392505,0.006302323,0.0013502674,0.00028926547,0.000003857184,0.026932439,0.000007804995,0.00020402865,0.8323792,0.023511203,0.10889767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008601449,0.00002436022,0.011124187,0.0016674724,0.00006028029,3.0939847e-7,0.024356458,0.000008121805,0.00028321487,0.0049173515,0.9573679,0.00010430601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00355273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004536763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006338551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000938253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5384786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381300344","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4433135","title":"The Irreducible Cores of Trustee Obligations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02187261897554969,"score_gpt":0.3289865310454176,"score_spread":0.3071139120698679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381300344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79496235,0.002966556,0.0016352587,0.08099863,0.0006969529,0.00051408086,0.000014021058,0.00020065338,0.1180115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785993,0.0075196214,0.000010933171,0.0000182884,0.00023569178,0.000009345894,0.0000012361588,0.0000054216825,0.013600123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850965,0.00006709421,0.00015971313,0.000067872665,0.00024187587,0.0009538238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999492,0.00015842295,0.00010144225,0.00011547409,0.00008531265,0.000047383972],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021722724,0.00003944203,0.00005550718,0.000044543012,0.0014820801,0.00006974947,0.00033673,0.000029363604,0.000019765053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015662506,0.000027720162,0.00006633799,0.00058666914,0.00017015242,0.000094278184,0.000024739978,0.00044642028,0.00007095672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020556954,0.00000807937,0.00040503743,4.3983752e-7,0.000017843857,8.324606e-8,0.0007872588,0.00003032889,0.000099682904,0.9893573,0.0013929278,0.007898967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008999762,0.000026599471,0.0018000441,0.0000037689,0.000009794155,0.0000040566465,0.017868001,0.000041251747,0.000053876138,0.7630393,0.21701913,0.00004422201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061841373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081983395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22631803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001970863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022842516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382290578","doi":"10.1515/9780228012450","title":"Regulatory Failure and Renewal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0150118055249656,"score_gpt":0.2267469148827328,"score_spread":0.2117351093577672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382290578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025780708,0.0000031451468,0.00000555398,0.0007490737,0.00010811264,0.00047227388,0.0005583037,0.00020235927,0.9978754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016755677,0.00012543987,0.00012763034,0.00011831269,0.00018168146,0.0000048380507,0.00005898066,0.000032024993,0.99767554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982588,0.00018957212,0.00015053866,0.00053649617,0.00052172947,0.00034285506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888825,0.00009992008,0.00020060294,0.00047198893,0.00008926667,0.00024997903],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022986931,0.00024038904,0.00028497836,0.00012619093,0.0023317996,0.0000609145,0.00061591907,0.00035358727,0.000191615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013762778,0.00030136018,0.0001432356,0.000033190096,0.00048136592,0.000115150346,0.0007626488,0.00055011373,0.000006447183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012408895,0.000010282674,0.0000027210554,0.000025896981,0.0000483698,0.000039605697,0.00059008907,0.0000036252552,0.0000020275615,0.94980186,0.049042106,0.00042102562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023411486,0.000019849238,0.000009521188,0.000026193795,0.00010663375,7.383018e-7,0.0006648882,0.0000011635829,0.000009907811,0.002379652,0.9962107,0.00033665914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006060429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042075746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007003035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037110195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382467350","doi":"10.1515/9781553392064-014","title":"The Law of Succession and the Canadian Crown","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Crown (dentistry); Geography; Biology; Ecology; Medicine; Orthodontics","score_opus":0.015323582701432723,"score_gpt":0.22669393358456114,"score_spread":0.21137035088312842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382467350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000062444083,0.000004027585,0.000007647666,0.0030341486,0.000067741545,0.0004192661,0.00013637714,0.000025433716,0.9962991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1208247,0.00020882968,0.000013707192,0.00018438553,0.000070043665,0.0000014468154,0.0000045575885,0.000012872291,0.87867945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900544,0.00012288312,0.00013604067,0.00021842432,0.00028171728,0.0002354705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880606,0.00028299706,0.00020068574,0.00037126435,0.00015055088,0.00018842051],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004228502,0.00014543644,0.00020009263,0.000041519208,0.0042934557,0.000085459855,0.00063810317,0.00024489567,0.00001661811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016798727,0.00009888913,0.000107253196,0.000010498822,0.0020450717,0.00004452148,0.00022528056,0.0003017032,0.0000037570037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023485152,0.0000010314237,0.0000011883966,0.000007715085,0.000028559338,0.0000021296978,0.00042640566,9.935852e-7,2.8591296e-7,0.99778074,0.0008890217,0.0008384243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026075295,0.000006731602,0.000008268505,0.00003662958,0.00007104856,1.5288579e-7,0.00016447998,0.000004046904,0.00001245581,0.006705776,0.992606,0.00012365614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7440762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109494366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016408025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016248153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99700284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385075546","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3891","title":"Transfer Theory and the Assignment of Contractual Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Property rights; Contract theory; Database transaction; Equity (law); Law; Transaction cost; Transfer (computing); Business; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.017517731011594675,"score_gpt":0.2934729145774008,"score_spread":0.2759551835658062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385075546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046595067,0.0002702543,0.0028736624,0.013237517,0.0001789081,0.00028273213,0.000015551446,0.00003994051,0.9365064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985374,0.00020463762,0.000027499462,0.0001834509,0.00017426853,0.000006973761,5.482583e-7,0.0000037082518,0.00086148793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904686,0.00030580425,0.00016188854,0.00006690459,0.00025794384,0.0001606153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927986,0.0004800247,0.00004069286,0.000073891075,0.0000418783,0.000083636856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002284232,0.000047540838,0.000099986435,0.000014890201,0.0010794494,0.000079028316,0.00017011628,0.000037940496,0.0001848366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031869375,0.000027082699,0.000063089064,0.00008517551,0.00054787216,0.00012512034,0.000015790389,0.00015852333,0.00001892407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033737957,0.000014927725,0.0000108537015,0.0000011561957,0.000021056368,0.0000021138208,0.003870918,0.000013344735,0.00014726403,0.99474716,0.00015768009,0.0009797922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000881028,0.00001669703,0.00030993225,0.000012423916,0.000033125987,0.0000077251925,0.0026144679,0.000026861546,0.0003736304,0.8769157,0.11874829,0.00006012807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007642367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02020806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016238992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003671683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385287340","doi":"10.1017/9781009038157.043","title":"Index","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04104454313276803,"score_gpt":0.28071116912985095,"score_spread":0.2396666259970829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385287340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018363232,0.000046576963,0.00039333123,0.00018319949,0.00095748185,0.0003881423,0.0005168231,0.00019114622,0.9971397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043247305,0.00037398946,0.000014453392,0.000064131826,0.00063157064,0.0000034031846,0.00009170571,0.000027643293,0.9944684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870753,0.00013468861,0.000109781584,0.00036548427,0.00030810997,0.0003743806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990915,0.000092309456,0.00012646506,0.00036385367,0.00012339695,0.00020247568],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015937137,0.0001661962,0.00021574332,0.0001154422,0.00085344125,0.000106091655,0.0007944521,0.00037451094,0.000044835404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020351255,0.00020646551,0.00014441232,0.00007521288,0.00034130778,0.00007263022,0.00033183576,0.00040106993,0.0031258392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004976236,0.0000058329088,0.0000011405556,0.000016271506,0.000023519571,0.000011563006,0.00020118034,0.0000055693636,0.000002899373,0.32916743,0.6702999,0.00025973417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014366435,0.000005072721,0.00003332207,0.00003228786,0.000035295925,2.2653863e-7,0.000682285,0.000017414271,0.000018837834,0.000001133173,0.998797,0.00023346998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019688692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017200719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3291663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002595443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004648231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385311011","doi":"10.59962/9780774867931-017","title":"Quebec and the “Sign Law” Thirty Years after <i>Ford</i> and <i>Devine</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Law; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.01078159078428983,"score_gpt":0.1868412900050101,"score_spread":0.17605969922072026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385311011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024700428,0.0007728477,0.000004464942,0.00019756464,0.00005271178,0.0006126357,0.0005690655,0.000042549458,0.9952781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05239709,0.001396799,0.00007685405,0.0002530442,0.00005721235,0.000003943683,0.000008976981,0.000016681779,0.9457894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990549,0.00007396917,0.00012117741,0.00029290776,0.00029667155,0.00016037395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993108,0.00011216117,0.00014395826,0.000272896,0.000065619075,0.00009459066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002753012,0.00008091027,0.00024878117,0.000011358292,0.0007170699,0.00023207351,0.00043047138,0.00014432211,0.00047529882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000073926076,0.00014611683,0.000098125965,0.0000080262125,0.0021085166,0.00009415581,0.0006662156,0.0002869971,0.0000014699797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050879982,0.000013736143,0.000034795394,0.000051416802,0.0000932279,0.00009140253,0.005254638,3.985144e-7,6.169363e-7,0.9282346,0.03400216,0.032172132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005462739,0.000011406002,0.00051683804,0.000058665923,0.00010815559,0.000005607396,0.00039862152,0.0000016556581,5.4832732e-8,0.006845594,0.99134177,0.00016535753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87951404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93910426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005509636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012133257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77689177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385312500","doi":"10.1515/9781553394518-009","title":"Intergovernmental Relations and the Supreme Court of Canada: The Changing Place of the Provinces in Judicial Selection Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Judicial reform; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.009579303973200167,"score_gpt":0.1965910321448836,"score_spread":0.18701172817168343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385312500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014714076,0.000002301218,0.0000066008715,0.0026216828,0.000069269765,0.0008261308,0.00015076774,0.000010079464,0.99484175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5203637,0.000040302577,0.000008311475,0.000036600104,0.00003525722,0.0000034711293,0.0000015755935,0.0000069776434,0.4795038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905,0.000091478374,0.0001693684,0.00015051864,0.0003812178,0.00015740846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925464,0.00013758984,0.00032346905,0.00017194638,0.00008061849,0.000031750005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002877755,0.00011011248,0.00016620281,0.00003954791,0.00095690397,0.000014096993,0.00040396975,0.00010852768,0.00001747922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018538925,0.000068573434,0.000067189256,0.000031706193,0.0006379558,0.00007588394,0.00030238394,0.00028306464,2.345747e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003072023,0.0000040969076,0.00002488182,0.0000089753075,0.00003325651,2.917454e-7,0.002314575,0.000017566534,0.0000027112133,0.9970178,0.0004321558,0.000112986934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043494947,0.00001452509,0.00033668548,0.0001201158,0.000100398895,4.3511866e-7,0.0055965893,0.00013346816,0.00012747769,0.0014473058,0.99155384,0.00013421907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7881357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23007901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095795526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033001613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78397006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385326236","doi":"10.1017/9781009329934.011","title":"General Index","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.044768549274999604,"score_gpt":0.2529641941198404,"score_spread":0.2081956448448408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385326236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006273584,0.000016255532,0.00014452553,0.00014042773,0.00022108865,0.00032037435,0.00022710764,0.00031002457,0.99855745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012672266,0.00016121294,0.000029903109,0.0000682816,0.00048066,0.0000010990068,0.000032347165,0.000034260167,0.997925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989378,0.0000302958,0.000109786444,0.00033771174,0.00031394535,0.0002704869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919146,0.000051392813,0.00011802661,0.0003341678,0.00011285569,0.0001920687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012816206,0.00017233969,0.00019284464,0.000099379475,0.0006357581,0.00006578537,0.00055671664,0.0003397314,0.000013368959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009359253,0.00021680394,0.00016384284,0.000013195766,0.0003659837,0.000062086896,0.00029352735,0.00033663545,0.00014574558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059942395,0.0000025848947,0.000002578741,0.000008128571,0.000034760753,0.00004403146,0.00014348453,0.000002367888,0.0000031799084,0.9412217,0.05780172,0.0007294816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012974649,0.0000057770935,0.000031114854,0.000024870697,0.00005265221,4.39527e-7,0.000090245994,0.000023194392,0.000006095927,0.00012525835,0.999267,0.00024360504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003950198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018102888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94146526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021200748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002513313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8841008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385509236","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3745","title":"The Class Actions Controversy: The Origins and Development of the Ontario Class Proceedings Act by Suzanne Chiodo","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Class (philosophy); Wrongdoing; Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Mechanism (biology); New class; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024855600549487333,"score_gpt":0.2710226018568361,"score_spread":0.24616700130734875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385509236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26784497,0.00032489977,0.0000650043,0.06950224,0.0006205165,0.0007149253,0.000036404883,0.000030159901,0.66086084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607205,0.00008132785,0.00008641629,0.00038487246,0.00011515076,0.00004358827,9.0995064e-7,0.0000075183666,0.0032081816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987781,0.0000787437,0.00023881564,0.000117731506,0.00051984924,0.0002667298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993024,0.00013412203,0.00026431328,0.000113159855,0.00009422286,0.00009182155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001062774,0.000085586864,0.0000973817,0.000009887758,0.011679579,0.00028886707,0.0006184439,0.00003224774,0.00013347375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003288497,0.000044572138,0.00007051973,0.00014526783,0.00033869175,0.00014817547,0.00017717957,0.000653098,0.0000026638145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133965605,0.000056991765,0.0021079571,0.0000012923687,0.00005532042,2.2221502e-7,0.011569333,0.000014097434,0.000348385,0.978048,0.0057832557,0.0020016993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022578827,0.00001494243,0.0023271749,0.000005789807,0.000020372008,0.000014396936,0.008030624,0.000013586996,0.0001455126,0.0035065508,0.98563015,0.0000650849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07772987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7057278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9798469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005886682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006182012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510009","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1431","title":"Joe’s Justice: Substantive, Procedural and Remedial Equality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Remedial education; Adjudication; Law; Statute; Economic Justice; Political science; Champion; Constitutional law; Procedural justice; Sociology; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.06489671300055498,"score_gpt":0.3705517571365437,"score_spread":0.3056550441359887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030851046,0.19022024,0.00019394702,0.18346898,0.00142322,0.0059850975,0.00032376577,0.0005500533,0.5869836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585264,0.03140241,0.0002026178,0.007451726,0.00032571174,0.00030474676,0.000028974815,0.000014804146,0.0017426212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984514,0.00029565144,0.00025718563,0.00025102528,0.0004804108,0.00026429276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937665,0.00008431887,0.000105211475,0.00020294928,0.00009837751,0.00013248877],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015261502,0.0000925603,0.00021284104,0.000011023551,0.0015049124,0.00004882997,0.00028731616,0.000025803292,0.0011135445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001607747,0.00008826765,0.000065722896,0.00029899197,0.00025116603,0.00015506048,0.00016962252,0.00020704059,0.000034134777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036249428,0.00003760827,0.00017934167,0.00047905638,0.000008508332,0.0000015095745,0.00082472793,3.9015075e-7,0.00003301969,0.982021,0.015182385,0.0012288687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009320888,0.000015517902,0.00020987839,0.00011068656,0.00010472495,0.000002325061,0.00045791816,0.0000051144425,0.0000046050327,0.0021833726,0.9966882,0.00012444581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001231624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030291327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009695348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020225869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510423","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3713","title":"The Puzzle of Soft Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Soft law; Law; Hard law; Jurisprudence; Public law; Constitution; Philosophy of law; Subject (documents); Common law; Relation (database); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; International law","score_opus":0.025728333104963322,"score_gpt":0.3099818433026857,"score_spread":0.2842535101977224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009674311,0.0005610397,0.00031250025,0.012164677,0.00018213653,0.000040842384,0.000004704818,0.000011611201,0.9857551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955709,0.00025025732,0.0004267684,0.00029985598,0.0003444928,0.0000027556014,7.02891e-7,0.000005309475,0.0030989826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999138,0.000114019436,0.00018171857,0.00007544595,0.00029011403,0.00020067907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993039,0.00013942092,0.0001068616,0.00015065607,0.0001920682,0.00010711265],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058173755,0.000044317523,0.000076247445,0.0000045744455,0.002586834,0.00020812856,0.0002788523,0.00004105874,0.00022049806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006318478,0.00003158049,0.00008949554,0.00010506001,0.00030512162,0.00012810959,0.00004862001,0.0001932308,0.000033836302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017078434,0.000027684686,0.00005595236,0.0000012050474,0.000011349482,0.0000046944965,0.0004578669,0.00001369269,0.00029678017,0.99709487,0.0005548515,0.0014793477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089558176,0.000005764592,0.000081488986,0.00000863755,0.000009307445,0.000015764579,0.0013041784,0.000008656385,0.0010213152,0.19309798,0.80431354,0.000043782544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020722583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.440721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99460346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003173725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013257786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511152","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3580","title":"Protection for Owners under the Law on Adverse Possession: An Inconsistent Use Test or a Qualified Veto System?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Possession (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Irish; Context (archaeology); Adverse possession; Test (biology); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; History; Politics; Land law","score_opus":0.1357513140918932,"score_gpt":0.36448162716542193,"score_spread":0.22873031307352873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057374343,0.00014769373,0.015801625,0.099933155,0.0027401026,0.0045332783,0.00023842037,0.00048170713,0.81874967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517125,0.000016555003,0.0007243233,0.0010677796,0.0006115635,0.00010989297,0.000005740192,0.000016662832,0.0022762225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847364,0.0003485559,0.0002917112,0.0002177688,0.0003909195,0.00027741026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986508,0.00035487924,0.00020780608,0.00026935103,0.0003074829,0.00020972104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009015579,0.00011350155,0.00013995316,0.000018596129,0.0034879185,0.00048832,0.00023524024,0.0001020595,0.00007304403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016353338,0.00006746216,0.00012992938,0.00018093591,0.0001725819,0.00041352442,0.000035787667,0.0002947623,0.000022675416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056482677,0.00015394177,0.00001751517,0.000014848258,0.000023121329,0.000013893994,0.0008998078,0.0002377574,0.0006135369,0.9974472,0.00015465384,0.0003672495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00270972,0.00075627974,0.0007996844,0.0006615368,0.00025174994,0.0005047363,0.15545464,0.0010927976,0.0022472607,0.036616303,0.798149,0.0007563173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031405922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3783557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96083087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002764968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000352633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518275","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2753","title":"Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Commission; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01438471046012162,"score_gpt":0.28533650610443456,"score_spread":0.27095179564431293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011319574,0.00002641731,0.005182307,0.030277936,0.00041516463,0.00004233706,6.4402724e-7,0.000037559174,0.9628857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98949116,0.000044425713,0.0012780105,0.00031679848,0.006176952,0.000002584418,9.153008e-7,0.0000054310467,0.002683738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992996,0.00010578487,0.00011772192,0.00009005588,0.00020859513,0.00017823442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995904,0.00002714043,0.000069116926,0.0001031644,0.000077697405,0.00013247479],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007699279,0.000042562056,0.00005869148,0.000015729353,0.001342919,0.00017696548,0.0001679251,0.000040715044,0.0006578724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007235671,0.000037837228,0.000045863057,0.00007760527,0.0001058317,0.00020766979,0.000016103993,0.00018336767,0.00026691644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014159931,0.00001646427,0.00004895094,5.9874947e-7,0.0000033415956,2.946932e-7,0.00032263753,0.00002344492,0.00013745016,0.98773366,0.005412521,0.006299217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007572525,0.000011200206,0.00014495822,0.0000020931134,0.000005276626,0.000010393379,0.00020414293,0.0000326395,0.00007434311,0.13733134,0.8620597,0.00004817735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012384919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055135347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005123241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003092414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385523923","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1361","title":"The Explosive Global Growth of Personal Insolvency and the Concomitant Birth of the Study of Comparative Consumer Bankruptcy: Consumer Bankruptcy in Global Perspective, by Johanna Niemi-Kiesilainen, Lain Ramsay &amp; William C. Whitford (eds.); Comparative Consumer Insolvency Regimes: A Canadian Perspective, by Jacob S. Ziegel","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Insolvency; Concomitant; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Art; Internal medicine; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.026987261071751922,"score_gpt":0.3141772551605752,"score_spread":0.2871899940888233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385523923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78324884,0.03258639,0.00011989543,0.012088021,0.00035136731,0.0042498563,0.0030192265,0.00003416072,0.16430223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973224,0.0020124905,0.00011891409,0.00023848981,0.00005495832,0.00010058268,0.000007474588,0.000020167972,0.0001245485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456817,0.0016196781,0.0012019519,0.0005990832,0.0011585726,0.00085256924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518424,0.0007609314,0.0012693385,0.0004890788,0.0018420721,0.00045434813],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016136288,0.00052092737,0.0011123297,0.00008267358,0.002470614,0.00021117767,0.0013002825,0.00021080098,0.00005926278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037171153,0.00032459048,0.00032451528,0.001210234,0.0065321852,0.00045899316,0.0002025783,0.000935047,0.0000051391703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047061668,0.0009624192,0.03474733,0.000015347767,0.0006937105,0.000005872679,0.10333629,0.000038547558,0.00008484734,0.85642385,0.0031768074,0.000044329638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018613804,0.0007757679,0.020952892,0.00048604098,0.00060425524,0.00010869595,0.7892913,0.00009045561,0.00035972387,0.13751225,0.030081313,0.0011234619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6893786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9298568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71891165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016926797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021056524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385533227","doi":"10.1515/9780773548916","title":"Daunting Enterprise of the Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021421797113788974,"score_gpt":0.25128350316278025,"score_spread":0.22986170604899128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385533227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021985328,0.0000010868819,0.000011223862,0.00033852228,0.00018609258,0.00047026612,0.00037434066,0.00006396809,0.99853253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023592137,0.00005044652,0.00004914182,0.00008258825,0.00014397294,0.0000014991314,0.00000767545,0.000019790645,0.97605276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867296,0.00013476494,0.00016930414,0.0003214029,0.0004203357,0.00028124172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982228,0.00009607604,0.00054707803,0.00085987285,0.0001652193,0.00010893952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021721536,0.00018736358,0.00027208557,0.00004274066,0.0026140842,0.00006685194,0.0017026132,0.00030563257,0.000021180373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031644937,0.00017376138,0.00028244389,0.000013850571,0.0009502146,0.00013081792,0.0008941517,0.0004060715,0.0000075256094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074651434,0.0000124187345,0.000008028741,0.0000332774,0.000044677847,0.000005126198,0.0007726519,0.000002049784,0.0000044121048,0.99234134,0.006516094,0.00025243065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016353867,0.000006245672,0.00002372345,0.00015018127,0.00011306029,1.203956e-7,0.00020359734,0.000001530839,0.000121727404,0.0013605908,0.9976735,0.00018214388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026697773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007264205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002840069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025461978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385569617","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4522241","title":"Why is Administrative Law So Complicated?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.04744585952975093,"score_gpt":0.36412298504470575,"score_spread":0.3166771255149548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385569617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12958178,0.001285395,0.005270546,0.3784115,0.0004286587,0.0007862618,0.000055948894,0.0007041407,0.48347577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876718,0.00170309,0.000027743486,0.002494681,0.00038888492,0.000011262105,0.000005019379,0.000011815794,0.0076857386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977368,0.000080501464,0.00016557524,0.00015512518,0.00028816448,0.0015738505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951357,0.00005995712,0.00008849649,0.00012311821,0.00008726235,0.00012761583],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009891563,0.00008128711,0.00009785275,0.000041910578,0.0017044258,0.00019048074,0.00036576175,0.00006196522,0.00014387653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024866582,0.00007484405,0.00008840446,0.00048000942,0.0002464594,0.00016405863,0.000034169232,0.00086337124,0.00053003116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003527613,0.000020400452,0.00010447294,6.5390157e-7,0.00002901616,0.0000011247924,0.0018146816,0.0000021278458,0.00008766437,0.98781884,0.008531211,0.00158631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009306419,0.00003749258,0.000117546006,0.0000028620161,0.0000075298917,0.000010291685,0.0059058415,0.000015182192,0.00005770878,0.3543756,0.63930434,0.00007254912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002996341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038099922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032028652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002186489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385589675","doi":"10.59962/9780774867306-003","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.027962145102645344,"score_gpt":0.2245751724434967,"score_spread":0.19661302734085134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385589675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001905049,0.00014087817,0.000009101368,0.000023671038,0.00013311583,0.00038900503,0.0008220997,0.00007015502,0.99822146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034874112,0.0004927391,0.00010103055,0.000021438871,0.00007676854,0.000001006006,0.00002889668,0.000017432898,0.99577326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999003,0.000035340796,0.00011970611,0.00028071483,0.00038538873,0.0001758806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999292,0.000036009766,0.00018509733,0.0002327623,0.00014039534,0.00011371341],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013809057,0.00006647128,0.00021066285,0.000021437654,0.00083264336,0.00009843526,0.00060727494,0.00017058899,0.007355837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007211895,0.00019027138,0.00015643322,0.000007809237,0.0004787881,0.00006620189,0.00040165707,0.00026202033,0.000022095364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011015095,0.00006885664,0.00003893586,0.00007894885,0.00019565997,0.00015719161,0.0033530795,0.0000023653906,0.0000035426524,0.5154142,0.39897346,0.08170273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019021194,0.000015983533,0.000053677024,0.00006452602,0.00006564706,0.0000014073331,0.00026267543,0.0000012190429,1.6737366e-7,0.0032472154,0.9959197,0.0001775819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48858598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6173485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59694624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017046275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000235153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99355155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385591318","doi":"10.59962/9780774864589-002","title":"Preface","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.028937447820582024,"score_gpt":0.21479794533682936,"score_spread":0.18586049751624734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385591318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009501167,0.00011739358,0.000047992628,0.000101272344,0.000075981814,0.0004118494,0.0006383025,0.000104915445,0.9984073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077602332,0.0003052639,0.000252939,0.00004534157,0.00015939334,3.81293e-7,0.000015420408,0.000017797998,0.9914432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907666,0.00002520388,0.000119656244,0.00030562046,0.00031821613,0.00015464798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992699,0.000035442405,0.00018123409,0.0001990381,0.00014474812,0.00016960794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000078749916,0.00007144617,0.00024031875,0.000011604131,0.00041922196,0.00013000862,0.00054049643,0.00026983992,0.00065727386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010013829,0.0001952443,0.00015403453,0.0000068428226,0.0005733952,0.000058976202,0.00023063939,0.00025731875,0.000022252745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013176821,0.000029872615,0.000019719035,0.00012513505,0.00017421559,0.00016978478,0.0037051023,0.0000022548197,0.000011789953,0.5019961,0.44083178,0.05292108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016159336,0.000016059037,0.000051352108,0.0001147572,0.00007119986,0.0000012591256,0.00020339024,0.0000028690204,4.5971902e-7,0.0035421918,0.9956481,0.00018676765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43979803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5396147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5548163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073196934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002314374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7961831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600293","doi":"10.59962/9780774829335","title":"Public Interest, Private Property","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Private property; Property (philosophy); Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08799029292626344,"score_gpt":0.23758876820771235,"score_spread":0.14959847528144893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049680535,0.000113227,0.000035345216,0.00014692423,0.00010739575,0.0006810622,0.00050612306,0.00013615012,0.997777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006460336,0.00014314103,0.00021690551,0.000031161762,0.00015206134,0.0000016705658,0.000046491943,0.000022258313,0.992926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859554,0.00011435804,0.00017789126,0.000373057,0.00043069565,0.00030848806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853903,0.000034583827,0.00026761554,0.0003515551,0.0005206105,0.00028660198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003380027,0.00009701358,0.0003167779,0.000032413867,0.00046853648,0.00037002363,0.0010437841,0.0003518351,0.0002888293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000472269,0.00018853838,0.00014764545,0.000023646742,0.000991827,0.00016372807,0.00049246964,0.00033694267,0.000023050039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050071712,0.000046854846,0.000023625716,0.00006454328,0.00007064866,0.00005101984,0.0010046025,1.7424314e-7,0.0000017037133,0.03669454,0.9244489,0.03758835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002781844,0.000025423593,0.00003680579,0.00019141455,0.000053015407,0.0000032722298,0.00020693615,0.000004952871,2.6127177e-7,0.0052109337,0.99375,0.00023882597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.337972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7300313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39205933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036090479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014345929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76883715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600429","doi":"10.59962/9780774829335-002","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04984354667820352,"score_gpt":0.24560359333015533,"score_spread":0.19576004665195182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001403955,0.0002417129,0.000020214937,0.00001810048,0.00011558589,0.00035964465,0.00053494825,0.0000700252,0.9984994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038430367,0.00024107523,0.00015426906,0.000011811803,0.00011601246,4.1246517e-7,0.000019270246,0.000016246378,0.99559784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990316,0.000026411755,0.00012047309,0.00025980352,0.00038373022,0.0001780067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898064,0.00002470457,0.00017900749,0.00023169497,0.00039832492,0.00018563903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017119023,0.00007065561,0.00023042042,0.000018812505,0.00036237223,0.00011381886,0.00053084054,0.000279557,0.00095544494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012130313,0.00018766576,0.00012235803,0.0000063082357,0.00059920753,0.00006637247,0.00023765706,0.00019122609,0.000052271458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075171106,0.000037622736,0.000021029939,0.00005024887,0.00011671038,0.00007314501,0.0020680542,9.705378e-7,0.0000018473985,0.18001713,0.7550029,0.06260283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023996527,0.00001443835,0.000032178497,0.00014281346,0.00006827799,0.0000012335661,0.00021116658,0.000001610739,1.779986e-7,0.007897471,0.99121135,0.0001792898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3945496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68022114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28567156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015239153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033986822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385690589","doi":"10.32920/23913132","title":"“The Legal Billy Club”: First Nations, Injunctions, and the Public Interest","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Indigenous; Principle of legality; Politics; Treaty; Public interest; Common law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.07844834672382082,"score_gpt":0.3348369343114589,"score_spread":0.25638858758763805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385690589","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028503246,0.0005671117,0.0010602436,0.8551139,0.002054322,0.0014012124,0.000044767447,0.0004382195,0.13646986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92400444,0.0062074214,0.000115807205,0.00042701227,0.0007064617,0.00072108384,0.000025953952,0.000019905448,0.06777194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852306,0.000223815,0.00031714336,0.0003339203,0.00032028224,0.0002817937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972866,0.0017356445,0.0001551267,0.0005207682,0.00019474258,0.00010711276],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019149485,0.00014064518,0.00014514402,0.00009528988,0.006106507,0.001897707,0.0008657674,0.00017130247,0.0000878423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017564874,0.000075715085,0.000120498065,0.00046414736,0.0012143899,0.00015099146,0.0011396349,0.0005585863,0.00022342676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003411403,0.0000123088175,0.00016517709,0.000007511161,0.000031119052,2.2552393e-7,0.0006391149,0.0000049633077,9.029251e-8,0.9692623,0.028890215,0.0009835903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013687948,0.0000031783093,0.0005420825,0.000015607608,0.000017851251,6.407336e-7,0.0030562468,0.00020745643,4.762528e-7,0.039865296,0.9560457,0.000108600485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012470628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5157267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001143554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004627483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385690722","doi":"10.32920/23913132.v1","title":"“The Legal Billy Club”: First Nations, Injunctions, and the Public Interest","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Indigenous; Principle of legality; Law; Politics; Public interest; Treaty; Context (archaeology); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.07844834672382082,"score_gpt":0.3348369343114589,"score_spread":0.25638858758763805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385690722","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028503246,0.0005671117,0.0010602436,0.8551139,0.002054322,0.0014012124,0.000044767447,0.0004382195,0.13646986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92400444,0.0062074214,0.000115807205,0.00042701227,0.0007064617,0.00072108384,0.000025953952,0.000019905448,0.06777194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852306,0.000223815,0.00031714336,0.0003339203,0.00032028224,0.0002817937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972866,0.0017356445,0.0001551267,0.0005207682,0.00019474258,0.00010711276],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019149485,0.00014064518,0.00014514402,0.00009528988,0.006106507,0.001897707,0.0008657674,0.00017130247,0.0000878423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017564874,0.000075715085,0.000120498065,0.00046414736,0.0012143899,0.00015099146,0.0011396349,0.0005585863,0.00022342676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003411403,0.0000123088175,0.00016517709,0.000007511161,0.000031119052,2.2552393e-7,0.0006391149,0.0000049633077,9.029251e-8,0.9692623,0.028890215,0.0009835903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013687948,0.0000031783093,0.0005420825,0.000015607608,0.000017851251,6.407336e-7,0.0030562468,0.00020745643,4.762528e-7,0.039865296,0.9560457,0.000108600485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012470628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5157267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.929397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001143554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004627483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385829522","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0112","title":"Public nuisance for private persons","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; Private law; Liability; Law and economics; Private sphere; Private rights; Political science; Business; Law; Public law; Public sphere; Economics","score_opus":0.0642349668068549,"score_gpt":0.2884805393198329,"score_spread":0.224245572512978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385829522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078877375,0.0002958789,0.0078000408,0.031394985,0.000453165,0.00045364656,0.00011104801,0.00017968421,0.88043416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906586,0.0003010627,0.0019357105,0.000041332914,0.00016994243,1.8682908e-7,0.000002424574,0.0000035002554,0.0068872413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995365,0.000029613118,0.00005186608,0.00006656475,0.00014064387,0.00017480353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996006,0.000045978995,0.00007332997,0.00006589336,0.000099330355,0.000114880844],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031789267,0.00003153703,0.00006279203,0.0000109623015,0.0015358821,0.000038147737,0.00028773045,0.000033862478,0.00047434552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029124441,0.000035708075,0.00008365271,0.000052770338,0.00016407196,0.00039488904,0.00003596713,0.00004945828,0.000015804715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007066422,0.000018525194,0.00027729006,0.0000032009157,0.00001649123,0.0000017989662,0.0063443165,0.0000059522717,0.00009323451,0.9795719,0.011556694,0.002103526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019800117,0.00001543096,0.001141841,0.0000051035418,0.000008477259,6.63986e-7,0.011110042,0.00005974116,0.000006693392,0.002025011,0.9853844,0.00004459615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01895976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123163745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017085145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008098585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385852533","doi":"10.1017/9781009374712.010","title":"Contracts, Organizations, And Institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04490424621993378,"score_gpt":0.25450702202126857,"score_spread":0.2096027758013348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385852533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004231685,0.000052895168,0.00030881556,0.00030861664,0.00012333393,0.00035356826,0.00036797795,0.00025909356,0.99818337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032991904,0.00077623513,0.00004793715,0.00006393712,0.00015612284,8.6246035e-7,0.000060283783,0.00002179602,0.99557364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927473,0.000022731021,0.00010007206,0.00025893067,0.00017316207,0.0001703864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992406,0.00007806751,0.00009463275,0.00021249885,0.00020478216,0.00016944416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009684736,0.0001309836,0.0001522537,0.00008753946,0.0010825116,0.00008109429,0.00025324605,0.00023766562,0.0000068669506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004698352,0.00016473707,0.000045024106,0.000024001543,0.0005306251,0.00009226289,0.00018729515,0.0002301549,0.000055125343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021869012,0.0000033104434,0.00000243088,0.0000079622105,0.000029029936,0.000019889507,0.0002036414,0.0000011947783,0.000004918702,0.98265064,0.016754858,0.0003199198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013250794,0.0000043603704,0.000036529564,0.00003405274,0.00008919643,0.0000010567084,0.00017891912,0.000005318245,0.0000052514683,0.00008115433,0.9992527,0.00017896373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017099915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022434616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013488063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004410693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83259135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386131659","doi":"10.59962/9780774854832-011","title":"Land Claims in British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; History","score_opus":0.027607143685420343,"score_gpt":0.22767325146242687,"score_spread":0.20006610777700654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386131659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017665833,0.00022850693,0.000020226875,0.000016027638,0.000114764945,0.00072863075,0.0009370159,0.00009480743,0.9801942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035857864,0.0007761694,0.00022588261,0.00004516979,0.00013110926,0.0000011847611,0.00004142493,0.00003170606,0.9628895],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824554,0.000048037764,0.00029477023,0.0004988776,0.00050965784,0.00040313994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989168,0.00008512569,0.00026379983,0.0002901883,0.00023219305,0.00021190822],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038051495,0.00009131299,0.00043331584,0.000037721977,0.0005853893,0.00065889466,0.00067504775,0.0005958201,0.0012332617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001196585,0.0003555436,0.00019483414,0.000026183576,0.0009234202,0.00011699929,0.00025343147,0.0004820376,0.000013638351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000324769,0.00031293905,0.015379802,0.00038476769,0.0003188949,0.0034709696,0.004311217,0.000008147624,0.000005274722,0.028969746,0.3407499,0.60605586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005918004,0.000023939798,0.009450824,0.0005120909,0.00005747561,0.000014342135,0.0003178817,0.0000038860067,8.490192e-8,0.0056490544,0.9830038,0.00037481188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99947363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6422539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022682486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030915084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386139504","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197664582.002.0005","title":"Preface","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Tort; Law; Nothing; Economic Justice; Common law; Political science; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Commercial law; Comparative law; Duty; Philosophy; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.08473007198369503,"score_gpt":0.3375004171655543,"score_spread":0.25277034518185926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386139504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.9015373e-7,0.000018969491,0.000042220017,0.0035065392,0.00011135557,0.00015938406,0.000015463,0.00026692604,0.9958783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00042543566,0.00028806707,0.00008396177,0.00013638908,0.00034437457,0.000008525715,0.000008049151,0.000018121975,0.9986871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999485,0.0000035932242,0.00007863795,0.00013614028,0.00018868106,0.000107959815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968123,0.00004364195,0.000035240602,0.00014533241,0.000032601438,0.000061944316],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011820714,0.00006190456,0.000072552575,0.000021443604,0.00022734035,0.000040529783,0.00017926931,0.0001443552,0.0030589972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012490817,0.00005690256,0.00005716329,0.000018543455,0.000089370275,0.00002649394,0.000051499657,0.00010984279,0.008791764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.2378476e-7,8.991237e-7,5.882391e-7,0.0000014446993,0.000004783133,4.9610355e-7,0.00023290829,2.9873843e-7,4.2144174e-7,0.9660065,0.031951748,0.0017997737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009980435,0.000001584053,0.0000052086366,0.000006379313,0.0000051823586,2.5072845e-8,0.000048444577,8.5442497e-7,6.5469635e-7,0.13644183,0.86341184,0.00006804845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007833659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036679553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83146006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036354908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011071023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386335375","doi":"10.1093/he/9780192857170.001.0001","title":"The Principles of Equity &amp; Trusts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive trust; Fiduciary; Equity (law); Trust law; Doctrine; Law; Settlor; Political science; Common law; Unjust enrichment; Context (archaeology); Duty; Express trust; Testamentary trust; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Restitution","score_opus":0.10526924285240073,"score_gpt":0.3175519106013819,"score_spread":0.21228266774898114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386335375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000092099166,0.000034418044,0.00007298742,0.0001749576,0.0001675332,0.00045290912,0.00017176638,0.00013901664,0.9986943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000403369,0.00077174255,0.000065252054,0.000011164555,0.00017072349,0.0000025503239,0.000022476996,0.000019827812,0.9985329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986722,0.000098388155,0.00018200502,0.00025547537,0.00046921187,0.0003227467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985523,0.00036074664,0.00029792407,0.0005134999,0.00015348247,0.00012203582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005024522,0.00014822035,0.00021252439,0.000053768283,0.0012699179,0.000072935596,0.001269976,0.00026850475,0.000014075732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060438397,0.00013438339,0.00018989906,0.000035969242,0.00080312684,0.00005549959,0.00093101873,0.00030889962,0.0000055403957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014417322,0.000006830311,0.0000041975727,0.000027397975,0.000048584112,0.0000024275491,0.001174742,0.0000064293517,0.0000023814912,0.9833045,0.011603824,0.0038042797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010130136,0.0000074444256,0.000031468742,0.000043147746,0.00006476193,1.23695e-7,0.00030033203,0.000005051466,0.0000071765903,0.0037640666,0.9955315,0.00014363098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097539276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006795947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98392767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030285408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087018503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97673106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386461436","doi":"10.1002/iir.1507","title":"Executory contracts in insolvency law: A global guide (2nd edition). By JasonChuah, EugenioVaccari, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2023. pp. 672. £220. ISBN: 978‐1‐80392‐341‐3","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Debtor; Bankruptcy; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Finance; Creditor; Debt","score_opus":0.028035428604549228,"score_gpt":0.3649176044356889,"score_spread":0.33688217583113966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386461436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039735716,0.17981954,0.00046793118,0.09419428,0.005849725,0.003373498,0.0016991681,0.00074145774,0.7098808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22069453,0.69478667,0.0014096253,0.027747266,0.0054807365,0.0027116803,0.002657021,0.00014417521,0.044368315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957183,0.00027756678,0.0012028874,0.0007595367,0.0013024998,0.00073923136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794024,0.0002526947,0.00042416743,0.0005146436,0.0005486791,0.00031956375],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018369883,0.0003626108,0.0005846786,0.00009798253,0.0004395168,0.00022364067,0.0014227115,0.00025059454,0.0020287628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000997651,0.0003732886,0.00036740286,0.0014362003,0.0003067964,0.0008655717,0.0002706924,0.0004753411,0.002143301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010038174,0.0002855458,0.00083051063,0.00016728835,0.000079182406,0.000039815834,0.00028133643,0.000009640721,0.00012425793,0.2487115,0.73992306,0.009537806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041593963,0.000027941069,0.0020430626,0.0011571128,0.000046632842,0.0000078213325,0.00013287102,0.000058299185,0.000025908028,0.006344799,0.98934466,0.00039496267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012493749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048530684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6655125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088319497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006164665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386649262","doi":"10.5040/9781509963690.ch-011","title":"The Essential Similarity of Express Trusts in England, Japan and Quebec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Genealogy; Geography; History; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015535285053106643,"score_gpt":0.30525421721821533,"score_spread":0.2897189321651087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386649262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035358367,0.00015433162,0.000018115268,0.0016099401,0.00014336126,0.0003325982,0.00003330496,0.00011544478,0.99405706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10622114,0.0006557957,0.000036994265,0.000017064307,0.00028033936,0.00002862787,0.0000023150742,0.00006623525,0.8926915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945503,0.000055448898,0.000102890444,0.00012091613,0.00014207934,0.00012364576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960715,0.00015233611,0.000061382445,0.00013492917,0.000010937466,0.000033263124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026270634,0.00005769257,0.00010248527,0.000031778294,0.00011866741,0.000041888514,0.0001824825,0.00012532061,0.0003526603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054851436,0.00003944731,0.000024423114,0.0001156351,0.00023365222,0.000020615864,0.00005973321,0.000090901856,0.000011163323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010692198,0.00008414452,0.0074199755,0.000054578035,0.000047941623,0.0000016878663,0.012261798,0.000001772707,0.000048898877,0.780445,0.16744994,0.032173563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099154844,0.0000015920097,0.0015289458,0.000016272374,0.000004106991,1.9739007e-8,0.0007708664,0.000004931608,0.000008508729,0.00046520843,0.997047,0.000053384545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46386182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9683233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82959706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016790378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076537384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5397084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386714369","doi":"10.1002/iir.1508","title":"<i>Bresco v Lonsdale</i> [2020] <scp>UKSC</scp> 25 [case comment]","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Citation; Computer science","score_opus":0.058012490604484976,"score_gpt":0.3884752632893208,"score_spread":0.3304627726848358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386714369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010403748,0.044921186,0.0005840824,0.23494494,0.002920993,0.002201564,0.00036612313,0.0013964421,0.7022609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3797938,0.5216517,0.0011371756,0.046155244,0.0025713688,0.0010587762,0.00031342698,0.00010823014,0.047210325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826545,0.00013890902,0.00043378663,0.00030208094,0.0005408055,0.000318945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987798,0.0003783647,0.0001730746,0.00029217787,0.00021221203,0.0001644032],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009700663,0.00013886207,0.00021266034,0.000065358385,0.00045099817,0.000118205986,0.0007047148,0.00006531174,0.0005180187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007224518,0.00013368686,0.00019002354,0.0007624102,0.00013146391,0.00027969488,0.00019490528,0.00019979157,0.003484617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.0746337e-7,0.000116453535,0.0009363685,0.00020447119,0.000056300294,0.00023604523,0.00079378864,0.0000047598637,0.00002974098,0.30237404,0.68022925,0.01501826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010663723,0.000009276215,0.00025875063,0.00050859916,0.000025325855,0.000040953277,0.00028443395,0.000061760875,0.000010695847,0.002402835,0.9962254,0.000065324246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000821248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043220833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6550506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011651686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013115798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99729127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386778159","doi":"10.1017/cls.2023.21","title":"The Person and the Mirror: On the Colonial Force of Corporate Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Personhood; Colonialism; Representation (politics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.039351254317371014,"score_gpt":0.2776615338744066,"score_spread":0.2383102795570356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386778159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84057504,0.000390587,0.0000033404012,0.12197438,0.0003076901,0.00033956987,0.000086121814,0.0000069579633,0.036316328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925793,0.0005318996,0.000012639399,0.0038331142,0.00014287014,0.000011473086,0.000001814778,0.000010633873,0.002876245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895376,0.00018775798,0.0002290796,0.00011059679,0.00011856916,0.00040022627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794036,0.0009722234,0.00032040477,0.000159279,0.0001758594,0.00043186272],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027151457,0.00009257102,0.00019581795,0.000013991197,0.0029125325,0.00017461515,0.00036596623,0.000089301764,0.000016472479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016150044,0.00005527181,0.00019075374,0.00021927581,0.0025102021,0.0000903523,0.000016544987,0.00034856927,0.0000016471076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007149922,0.0000016701565,0.00005152722,0.000006156012,0.000045509525,0.0000045074235,0.052934382,0.0000034023221,0.000011307113,0.9448597,0.0018678274,0.00020686815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010555406,0.00011885002,0.002235447,0.00008396024,0.00010977284,0.000030597836,0.13715887,0.0002922998,0.000018122588,0.15354235,0.70514464,0.00020952702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3024098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.921204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79131734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020466796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007183061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386849606","doi":"10.1017/s0009840x23001713","title":"AN OVERVIEW OF ROMAN LAW - (D.) Johnston Roman Law in Context. Second edition. Pp. xiv + 221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022 (first edition 1999). Paper, £19.99, US$25.99 (Cased, £64.99, US$84.99). ISBN: 978-1-108-70016-0 (978-1-108-47630-0 hbk).","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Classical Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); History; Classics; Law; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.041620970206661355,"score_gpt":0.3083677576617886,"score_spread":0.26674678745512725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386849606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06008387,0.31893373,0.00020886077,0.13983159,0.00404914,0.015864907,0.00965391,0.0020260806,0.4493479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.510078,0.4532771,0.000093338465,0.012585791,0.0029599594,0.00044212828,0.0015001673,0.00017178216,0.018891687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939749,0.0014975371,0.0011667373,0.0010801426,0.0012284972,0.0010521738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959424,0.00091641495,0.00072505645,0.0014495935,0.00029142256,0.0006751161],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025812627,0.00058963476,0.0012290601,0.00009776305,0.0017884139,0.00020231043,0.0016979175,0.00039103907,0.0012423785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003331797,0.00051325996,0.000584526,0.00176215,0.0016803073,0.0013195882,0.0004924836,0.0010185405,0.000556792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002911156,0.00033176824,0.000058307174,0.00093131716,0.00004774285,0.000041509407,0.00016442289,0.0000092877635,0.00011878471,0.6317737,0.36535597,0.0011380576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008345276,0.00013600376,0.0033362536,0.0015245145,0.00026733338,0.0000104364435,0.00036697573,0.00021317347,0.000049837432,0.0006069207,0.99206173,0.00059230067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026147831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07356911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6311668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006320742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049178983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386941149","doi":"10.7202/1091999ar","title":"L’intérêt d’assurance en assurancede personnes : une étude de droit comparé","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03898895679449161,"score_gpt":0.32789608804657777,"score_spread":0.28890713125208617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386941149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69684726,0.030300312,0.008277533,0.08293384,0.0025840246,0.00079278846,0.0002302268,0.00055522495,0.1774788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96724766,0.01496556,0.0076099993,0.0005713362,0.0021324987,0.00018697258,0.000028104838,0.00005978669,0.0071980753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546504,0.0011982259,0.0006199417,0.0005511872,0.0007035376,0.0014620482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969882,0.0013583634,0.0003619422,0.00044091925,0.00028588012,0.0005647136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025533356,0.00046069274,0.0005766685,0.000101773214,0.0011705746,0.00029283593,0.0006748175,0.00044416956,0.00047895967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004875071,0.00050261413,0.00029469325,0.001167393,0.0014900633,0.0023356858,0.000085930624,0.00068011996,0.0007764675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094362935,0.0014652682,0.15702078,0.0005819491,0.0003861625,0.000013479834,0.09879696,0.016335102,0.0013232254,0.5363263,0.03357972,0.15407668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004942305,0.00008938756,0.48454878,0.00056516123,0.00018537916,0.000035619014,0.007018616,0.0040103933,0.0007778144,0.0105417585,0.49087685,0.00085599744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013435758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011646458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52578455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070602854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002234348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386984756","doi":"10.1057/978-1-349-96073-6_9627","title":"Canon Collins Trust","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington; Research Committee, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Killam Trusts; Tel Aviv University; Camargo Foundation; University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Canada Council for the Arts; Government of Canada","keywords":"Canon; Political science; Sociology; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04573792933274908,"score_gpt":0.29403883567628,"score_spread":0.24830090634353089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386984756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038134982,0.00015136377,0.000029533701,0.0004726362,0.00045799493,0.00075443205,0.0004112909,0.00035131813,0.9973333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6249283,0.0002277318,0.000051563064,0.00015697534,0.00082551665,0.000058133894,0.000053751206,0.000076747856,0.37362128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979531,0.00003436877,0.00037918406,0.00051903864,0.00060031225,0.00051399483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986247,0.00014935718,0.0002272556,0.00055221334,0.00014119738,0.00030531263],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035344722,0.00033821384,0.00038834743,0.00015319245,0.0007724755,0.00013277536,0.00058835227,0.00047558337,0.0009146964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043258966,0.00034586727,0.00026976486,0.000045535915,0.00042465763,4.7790195e-7,0.00016630407,0.00037354295,0.0021306516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003017465,1.7319695e-7,0.000034451557,0.000013430122,0.000047397687,0.000021141006,0.0011545514,9.973757e-7,0.000012678541,0.9930954,0.0002654702,0.0053512873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009765313,0.0000148603,0.00007111094,0.000041533596,0.00004482093,8.645631e-7,0.000118010386,0.0000045200563,0.0000113674405,0.6542137,0.3450679,0.00031368135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025942295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017696567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62489015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021176809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005211513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387116868","doi":"10.1002/iir.1506","title":"Guest editorial: <scp>Insolvency‐related</scp> judgments and <scp>war‐related</scp> claims—Recent court practice in Ukraine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Citation; Political science; Law; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.021790397256705903,"score_gpt":0.36474190769796605,"score_spread":0.34295151044126015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387116868","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048998434,0.07457761,0.0000057034017,0.006469132,0.84617764,0.0017464155,0.0006338343,0.00030051838,0.070040174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000039535422,0.51956856,0.00008496275,0.00028966763,0.468757,0.0004438129,0.0011098484,0.0001003227,0.00960628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99069697,0.0007606437,0.002298735,0.0014511044,0.0037365651,0.0010559566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98545754,0.009464322,0.0018626233,0.0007359013,0.0019645127,0.0005151106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005489485,0.000800055,0.0012427502,0.00041564944,0.0006032061,0.0003918793,0.0020861414,0.0017520153,0.00013937727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043023515,0.0008219546,0.0004152797,0.0015269566,0.00043684538,0.0011543459,0.00065947534,0.0030377938,0.0016217637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024784943,0.00037561572,0.00004878775,0.0004733498,0.00029965912,0.000050815197,0.001901567,0.000006383161,0.0000039788897,0.0056460183,0.98926204,0.0019293078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072158576,0.0000763223,0.00006812975,0.0048117163,0.00032523996,0.000005397423,0.0005060829,0.000016232263,0.0000015475778,0.0021488948,0.9910995,0.0002193923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030328075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010131916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44499093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012258204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017282245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667228","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0060","title":"The Autonomy of Administration","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Jurisprudence; Administrative law; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Autonomy; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Doctrine; Presumption; Judicial restraint; Sociology; Judicial activism","score_opus":0.018280407148459875,"score_gpt":0.27629386433761677,"score_spread":0.2580134571891569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07262072,0.00012571336,0.00040631613,0.0067770337,0.00015091039,0.000097546275,0.000009389652,0.000026394622,0.919786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960412,0.00028265166,0.0001736405,0.000005058901,0.000048010304,2.3184711e-8,5.259875e-7,8.1201546e-7,0.0034481282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996922,0.000036298687,0.0000560246,0.000028024131,0.00011929663,0.00006812666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996951,0.000051072715,0.000088556015,0.000050838342,0.00007396058,0.00004045486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031680803,0.000016568176,0.000035169764,0.0000037285035,0.0010638111,0.000015590102,0.00018886717,0.000018683262,0.00018442958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000109674165,0.000014647939,0.000041545154,0.000030455969,0.00019002265,0.00015977863,0.000020492793,0.00003440225,0.000006730119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094719335,0.000011703407,0.00018956247,0.0000011561167,0.000011464854,0.0000013284765,0.00574429,0.000009482694,0.0000735085,0.9879835,0.0015768973,0.0043876045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077077646,0.000019125335,0.003742889,0.000003691092,0.0000069114503,5.119674e-7,0.01904797,0.00003027598,0.000039592807,0.0012993296,0.97571295,0.000019687719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030844536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21444836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096752854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018160006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9756092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387730473","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2023.17","title":"The Rise and Fall of Private Law - Reciprocal Freedom: Private Law and Public Right Ernest J. Weinrib","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Reciprocal; Private law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025388265958959277,"score_gpt":0.2868824142261665,"score_spread":0.26149414826720724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387730473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91068816,0.0031758437,0.000058648577,0.03387144,0.00044764119,0.00041957194,0.00007328886,0.000033441098,0.051231943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981108,0.0007530859,0.000207971,0.00032529948,0.00022672341,0.000006861779,8.073736e-7,0.000012883108,0.00035558632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840933,0.0001385419,0.00041828377,0.00018039891,0.00035573813,0.00049771846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981756,0.00025500963,0.00028776773,0.00023497519,0.0002236593,0.0008229633],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012770368,0.000121058554,0.00021037275,0.000063701154,0.0016442337,0.00041803622,0.00067304994,0.00009997892,0.000021506268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015568877,0.000091347305,0.000063969506,0.00038949455,0.0025571783,0.00051030936,0.00007050517,0.00030445194,0.000013533481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004589514,0.000006892348,0.0023837567,0.000009846575,0.00001889144,0.00003662095,0.0011696302,0.0000037929944,0.00009528558,0.9952002,0.0005944738,0.00047599326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019477648,0.000046943147,0.0029679714,0.00006249641,0.000020920332,0.000022036733,0.0003028812,0.00002676691,0.0001300623,0.030252734,0.9658507,0.000121695906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10619417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70326465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091708345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059130864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387976370","doi":"10.2478/bjals-2023-0011","title":"Magical Thinking and Appearance-based Recusal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of American Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Precept; Jurisprudence; Law; Obligation; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Moral obligation; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03865647748839743,"score_gpt":0.3557058915749545,"score_spread":0.31704941408655707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387976370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96416074,0.0072922735,0.00019367636,0.021907648,0.00022430712,0.000117119394,0.000009008535,0.0000807573,0.006014492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99018717,0.007878878,0.00090609124,0.00034166916,0.00043152669,0.0000044518865,2.633726e-7,0.000007744457,0.00024220449],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988882,0.000113279726,0.00024774048,0.000114103015,0.00039901005,0.0002376554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927825,0.00014671049,0.00021872476,0.000044742217,0.00020325267,0.000108340864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080345763,0.00006535816,0.00024917492,0.00005541913,0.0007645487,0.00018417624,0.00017766979,0.000019120745,0.000007898057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041205884,0.00006615953,0.000076507895,0.00052733277,0.0010198599,0.00017766943,0.000058178317,0.00021830636,0.000009642723],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122003206,0.00022060567,0.048557002,0.00007117385,0.00046703307,0.0015455118,0.0191401,0.0002484269,0.00021977944,0.04019329,0.047328405,0.84188664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008828584,0.00033516236,0.23153406,0.00067158294,0.00007889504,0.00022606492,0.065295,0.000041000487,0.00004382513,0.004090954,0.696415,0.00038556365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022692932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060409796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8415011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053844557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011513572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5880368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388026852","doi":"10.7202/1106507ar","title":"Équité et bonne foi : perspectives historiques et contemporaines sur les distinctions fondamentales entre ces deux outils de justice contractuelle","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02525472919846003,"score_gpt":0.27297438862993223,"score_spread":0.2477196594314722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388026852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62970936,0.014581718,0.0042344225,0.06648015,0.0005814618,0.0008090885,0.0006923604,0.00063817616,0.28227326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7647966,0.007081931,0.00046396238,0.00024709912,0.0004738114,0.000022097995,0.00006340473,0.000039624614,0.22681145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977424,0.0003767555,0.0003066632,0.000534738,0.00025616854,0.00078326644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980271,0.0008196604,0.00023764663,0.00030647847,0.00022565277,0.00038345437],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008171865,0.00029565787,0.00036841552,0.0001443723,0.0014505213,0.00014618043,0.0004944194,0.000296221,0.00048400764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003422032,0.0003860027,0.00030283464,0.00059809134,0.0005987491,0.00047827227,0.00021683956,0.00041784748,0.00012405973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055660494,0.00030880634,0.0050018737,0.00033811163,0.00015582702,0.00017463492,0.08453064,0.00059489184,0.0020926865,0.88940203,0.0156079,0.0017369653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005929739,0.00007308623,0.009441143,0.00029353454,0.00039152452,0.00003649026,0.09533403,0.0013479341,0.00024457483,0.007074735,0.884741,0.00042895155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013139458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038875535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88232726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049205986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000508402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388269336","doi":"10.1017/9781108878272.015","title":"Index","year":2023,"lang":"sv","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.041543059896475186,"score_gpt":0.27301839199036293,"score_spread":0.23147533209388774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388269336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020911861,0.00008915414,0.00035519796,0.00030911286,0.001622988,0.00082978245,0.0012727536,0.00027220006,0.9931576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036948003,0.0007496459,0.000017143526,0.00010246258,0.0009208527,0.0000055912333,0.0001399281,0.00005731239,0.96105903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970705,0.00032486318,0.00029065693,0.0008799126,0.00061296584,0.00082111167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792534,0.00022314648,0.00035649078,0.00075867254,0.00026797532,0.00046835127],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031143893,0.0004353151,0.0005158948,0.000210106,0.0017268402,0.00025025257,0.0016789315,0.0007611419,0.00006199342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003432327,0.0005445503,0.00037147236,0.00020182412,0.0008502509,0.00016487429,0.0009404482,0.0008805074,0.005333166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002569297,0.00002838392,0.000008344366,0.00006751513,0.000105319974,0.000053074167,0.00062380964,0.000028889295,0.000021005173,0.40119335,0.59738594,0.00045864208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042874366,0.000023622099,0.00030167977,0.000104823455,0.00015956018,0.0000011330931,0.0025209875,0.00025869935,0.00004708332,0.0000016294184,0.9955585,0.0005935445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024316901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017288634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40119174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050492183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007404685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416660","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0014","title":"Remedies for Breach of Contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Breach of contract; Default; Law; Enforcement; State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Political science; Damages; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04399184211720365,"score_gpt":0.3229558516312798,"score_spread":0.2789640095140762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000068060517,0.00013468746,0.00066457427,0.0014316152,0.000056304536,0.00037692257,0.00009613155,0.000031250078,0.9972017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023745546,0.0000887839,0.00056910556,0.00007494619,0.00041179307,0.00001846489,0.000031548992,0.000010937638,0.9750489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994556,0.0000031400618,0.00017115001,0.0001129878,0.0001540718,0.00010306252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994672,0.00013753191,0.0001217628,0.000112847236,0.00012893611,0.0000317431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016903272,0.00007067933,0.00015744331,0.000022600687,0.0001359943,0.000014456191,0.00013660202,0.00014967793,0.0004343861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020740667,0.000061358645,0.00011309133,0.000008687889,0.00017777002,0.000028433724,0.0000144146,0.000059398284,0.000019473062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014860672,0.0000057127136,0.00000439333,0.000008014041,0.000009856504,6.683066e-8,0.00012405068,3.2444493e-7,0.000010503539,0.96067244,0.03665511,0.0025080435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057640525,0.000008124595,0.000024445373,0.0000126082095,0.00002062849,5.0233332e-8,0.00003200134,0.0000029107277,0.000021328511,0.06208866,0.93766004,0.00007153311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036537987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061238743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90100497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028398872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010656777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55234754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416661","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0007","title":"The Force and Scope of Contractual Obligations: Standards of Care, Mistake, Frustration,","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vendor; Mistake; Scope (computer science); Obligation; Business; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Task (project management); Law; Economics; Political science; Marketing; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.015534662455140418,"score_gpt":0.29638882148936874,"score_spread":0.28085415903422833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015448926,0.002398413,0.0003913228,0.0006461347,0.000030347277,0.0004058064,0.0004305533,0.0000135614255,0.99552935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29306886,0.0016505531,0.00020313372,0.000029473342,0.0001275049,0.000012937894,0.00004238077,0.000011943842,0.70485324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899733,0.000013807617,0.00033335667,0.00012422854,0.0004332978,0.00009796792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986102,0.0002169866,0.00026397404,0.00017003248,0.0006981255,0.00004068735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031956102,0.00008899447,0.00016309701,0.000024540901,0.0004140294,0.000056083136,0.0001535186,0.00013773247,0.00013625226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006902149,0.00006535226,0.000059545368,0.000031024763,0.0006485724,0.000065328204,0.000019514056,0.000093049675,0.0000014606084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004389825,0.0000035016521,0.000010078844,0.000016895558,0.000013178826,6.373946e-8,0.0005380553,0.0000027429446,0.000012544095,0.9911552,0.005704379,0.0025389455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107983295,0.000027280576,0.00008932257,0.000046357978,0.000033352957,1.141533e-7,0.0010757437,0.0000019127822,0.00017837355,0.05821148,0.9401427,0.000085385655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019044636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015380431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9344383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054456646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006181529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85826415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416667","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0013","title":"Third Parties","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Privity of contract; Law; Doctrine; Phrase; Law and economics; Business; Severability; Property (philosophy); Political science; Exclusion clause; Economics; Contract management; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03985253117171977,"score_gpt":0.2940940582925033,"score_spread":0.2542415271207835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000036792812,0.000120009136,0.000081454906,0.0026954683,0.000069470654,0.00012377942,0.000012011217,0.000118087926,0.99677604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045232773,0.000116983596,0.00010811336,0.00022879294,0.0005616425,0.000008094824,0.000011107302,0.000009960455,0.99443203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944115,0.0000046156115,0.00011077773,0.00012686403,0.00019439223,0.00012220895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996947,0.000028429333,0.000051469364,0.00013933922,0.00003929146,0.000046746187],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009753478,0.00007728003,0.00009356405,0.000018540204,0.00029199992,0.000060827926,0.00015454543,0.00015652132,0.0023074618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004809892,0.00006800347,0.00007317837,0.000010452907,0.0001728099,0.000039013372,0.00003122283,0.00010817136,0.001295907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5988691e-7,0.000001907682,0.000003499961,0.0000011266947,0.0000030001956,3.2682595e-7,0.00012275812,6.7775494e-7,3.0490077e-7,0.8342559,0.16501744,0.00059291354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012295262,0.0000020338384,0.000008998176,0.0000050557987,0.0000075159874,4.454248e-8,0.000038356076,8.708091e-7,0.0000019210056,0.12340918,0.87642735,0.00008638359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028830953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063408045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7114099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039145958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009641645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416681","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0006","title":"Implied Terms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Law and economics; Function (biology); Law; Business; Mathematical economics; Political science; Economics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.029001823932431545,"score_gpt":0.2966479332090232,"score_spread":0.26764610927659166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003019292,0.000025512976,0.00013590339,0.0016960322,0.000066349494,0.00017711915,0.000019952187,0.00011297973,0.99776316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076039867,0.00004561796,0.00015291556,0.0002609033,0.0005969865,0.000008012561,0.000024456467,0.000015179974,0.99129194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938196,0.0000032761716,0.00012227125,0.00016378796,0.00018622616,0.00014246222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965036,0.000024606783,0.000059377136,0.00017751873,0.000026761183,0.00006137131],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000082737584,0.00009155681,0.00010392794,0.000025856476,0.0002778275,0.000062073144,0.00019632926,0.00018606949,0.0034714655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000029133928,0.00008052727,0.00008061864,0.000012305866,0.00013099407,0.000031829797,0.00003959455,0.00011834967,0.0012281294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.0070584e-7,0.000002516013,0.0000029423288,0.0000010892381,0.0000035035412,5.5782164e-7,0.000059143018,2.6872948e-7,0.0000024041558,0.9228172,0.07457686,0.0025333695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002226773,0.000001941997,0.000025681817,0.000003953691,0.0000075401936,1.0642214e-7,0.000010445837,5.212614e-7,0.0000019077745,0.13016474,0.86965716,0.00010370894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020445487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00313188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7950803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006152885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008306015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416716","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0012","title":"Unfair Contracts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Outcome (game theory); Law and economics; Game theory; Contract theory; Process (computing); Business; Law; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0281308234507107,"score_gpt":0.2927559964118993,"score_spread":0.2646251729611886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002890992,0.00009644042,0.00013316082,0.0030218223,0.00008345886,0.00019986619,0.000020681618,0.00011781064,0.9963239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012697931,0.00008338342,0.00012698189,0.00035684547,0.0006525208,0.0000059529025,0.000021232288,0.000014117502,0.986041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999351,0.000005144976,0.00012738486,0.0001549094,0.00021430734,0.00014724863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995919,0.00005157896,0.000070365575,0.0001517876,0.00005910238,0.00007530322],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011364778,0.000091673726,0.00011423416,0.000022997761,0.00026132574,0.000060245417,0.00017206011,0.0002107704,0.0030784262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008686811,0.00008387834,0.0000794968,0.0000125928855,0.00014495972,0.000045568813,0.000024397355,0.00014244774,0.0013138022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.713482e-7,0.0000037801376,0.0000014361997,8.400593e-7,0.000004294764,0.0000012327077,0.000049396585,7.420108e-7,0.0000010748515,0.90996563,0.08839781,0.0015734808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003245906,0.0000024610636,0.00001929579,0.000006906323,0.000010034477,1.1537721e-7,0.000015561045,0.0000010333506,0.0000017724582,0.07286034,0.9269401,0.000109943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035916918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065264753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8385423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064411164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015000951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416730","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0005","title":"Express Terms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Phrase; Business; Law; Term (time); Law and economics; Content (measure theory); Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03120542617085813,"score_gpt":0.2931913330319306,"score_spread":0.2619859068610725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000028583306,0.000041136693,0.0002746435,0.0010934803,0.00007272936,0.0001597825,0.000020817952,0.000102877726,0.99823165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040170196,0.00005367904,0.00023428154,0.0001759856,0.0006550064,0.000010071598,0.00001805201,0.000014120771,0.9948218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939793,0.0000042677857,0.00010999078,0.00015871013,0.00020201605,0.0001270735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996544,0.000025421647,0.000054338303,0.00018037863,0.000028125347,0.000057313362],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007321835,0.000085819935,0.00009481353,0.000022397164,0.00024956255,0.00006437999,0.00022074484,0.00017470437,0.003434949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000032198311,0.000075923395,0.00007463293,0.000009666541,0.00013769613,0.00004289939,0.000042253996,0.00011137024,0.0008176712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.6264877e-7,0.0000028667073,0.0000027770743,0.0000013467582,0.0000026690157,7.2752675e-7,0.000087111664,5.1630144e-7,0.000002824456,0.9057495,0.0926487,0.0015007718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019383511,0.0000016962155,0.000008451306,0.000007740537,0.0000063556904,7.7160344e-8,0.0000136700255,8.156045e-7,0.0000033964006,0.0707078,0.9291253,0.000105328196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021868232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016237969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83647656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043832093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005655476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416732","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0011","title":"Duress and Undue Influence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Plea; Undue influence; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Position (finance); Law; Intervention (counseling); Business; Set (abstract data type); Aside; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018229295167320733,"score_gpt":0.28333818492495755,"score_spread":0.2651088897576368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023297983,0.00014721046,0.00004000095,0.001677211,0.000023155759,0.0001377872,0.000013741213,0.000054627206,0.9976733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031871863,0.0002503797,0.00010001209,0.00024151929,0.00018641041,0.00000538457,0.000005214095,0.000008948209,0.9673303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994877,0.000004578223,0.000095649455,0.0001559205,0.00015171114,0.00010445884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999693,0.00003664953,0.000048013208,0.000117133735,0.000043674987,0.00006155607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000800512,0.00007853524,0.00008674445,0.00002148248,0.0002690462,0.00007397349,0.00012435252,0.00015791347,0.00038257925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007694845,0.00007124246,0.000026824402,0.000013080735,0.0002414071,0.00005745947,0.000046598838,0.00011281321,0.00012809428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.0983788e-7,0.0000016322481,0.000023238483,0.0000028881461,0.0000026387104,7.8558287e-7,0.00009080629,0.0000020940975,0.0000020231482,0.99249166,0.006476962,0.00090507383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002175184,0.0000021343792,0.00025168428,0.000010772711,0.000007180861,2.41468e-7,0.000015884121,0.0000013113813,0.0000011607156,0.077178486,0.92241454,0.00009487044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051776627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064683855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91593754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002854813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077227334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78271115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388416738","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0009","title":"The Duty to Disclose Material Facts","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Duty; Nothing; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023875399601265685,"score_gpt":0.2925545599791847,"score_spread":0.26867916037791906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388416738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009856775,0.000013091193,0.000054472053,0.009287071,0.00029439045,0.00037094162,0.00008250269,0.000067545254,0.98973143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019749178,0.00004746291,0.000064525615,0.00026271693,0.0010675373,0.000021047013,0.000018456874,0.000014887128,0.97875416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922055,0.000010359614,0.00014580938,0.00017076594,0.00025527502,0.00019726239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995198,0.000053580763,0.00005404553,0.00023220944,0.000041428862,0.00009889559],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016021266,0.00010610586,0.0000951887,0.0000141108285,0.00085328124,0.00025964447,0.00034084503,0.00012642264,0.0013075835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012281133,0.00006615992,0.00006723218,0.000016621021,0.00013761455,0.000035554138,0.00009817698,0.00008938012,0.0011359983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017041815,0.000002489897,8.612215e-7,7.1677636e-7,0.0000036791325,4.1159748e-7,0.00013104134,6.7053554e-7,0.000006889309,0.9230056,0.07475154,0.0020944339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016734786,0.0000046857144,0.00004499872,0.00000474599,0.000006552908,6.6937176e-8,0.000041150142,2.43451e-7,0.000016071997,0.03961997,0.96013826,0.000106498184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004412794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016139235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88538677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006833985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009738263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417315","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0003","title":"Offer and Acceptance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.028169061606744986,"score_gpt":0.29059624437564324,"score_spread":0.26242718276889826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018851402,0.00019976201,0.00011824067,0.0016963258,0.000035843783,0.00012813896,0.0000110950405,0.000049507024,0.99774224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009848802,0.00016318804,0.00020010915,0.00023353765,0.00031240904,0.000004466136,0.000005153516,0.000009063088,0.98922324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955785,0.0000031704358,0.00007851691,0.00014188251,0.00012683864,0.000091752736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975955,0.0000244017,0.00003726268,0.00010434141,0.000027768092,0.000046695757],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006370553,0.00006915702,0.000082100574,0.000015363683,0.00020871375,0.00005460144,0.00010006468,0.00012880091,0.0032937338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003497011,0.000061781124,0.000031099706,0.000009468354,0.00016232285,0.00004248562,0.000033925193,0.00008791586,0.00028451078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8659941e-7,0.0000013826456,0.000010611783,0.0000014637826,0.0000022538666,3.1229493e-7,0.00006377222,8.750569e-8,8.788738e-7,0.94088423,0.054876465,0.0041583744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019934902,0.0000016721202,0.00012222174,0.0000049679065,0.0000060648536,9.7946824e-8,0.000016217973,0.0000010418155,9.929515e-7,0.052282885,0.94746107,0.00008285132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011425215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035021012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89258456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024932744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046481287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99761736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417321","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0004","title":"Beyond Offer and Acceptance: Formalities, Intent to Create Legal Relations, and Consideration","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.022141240997826973,"score_gpt":0.2769733572471733,"score_spread":0.2548321162493463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008778754,0.0003108244,0.0006985055,0.0064042355,0.00006638293,0.0005311914,0.000063217,0.000055369073,0.9909924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07871998,0.0001829216,0.00091138436,0.000868224,0.00022452984,0.00002911588,0.000049869,0.000015313946,0.91899866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910104,0.000014347631,0.00025148422,0.00025947558,0.00020849398,0.00016513655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945956,0.00007930813,0.00008080526,0.00013382555,0.00011476587,0.00013172315],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001930806,0.00014789758,0.0001698943,0.00006874755,0.00061686215,0.00029755334,0.00006700765,0.00019066007,0.0011208543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027500288,0.0001386577,0.00003555045,0.000024894194,0.00021299518,0.00028433715,0.000077734905,0.00015721527,0.00007031331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028331874,0.0000032851558,0.00009385987,0.0000050243234,0.000008997865,7.569132e-7,0.0005971785,0.00000202304,0.0000025207105,0.9508245,0.046460573,0.0019984264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009115583,0.000016698554,0.00062323426,0.000021648093,0.000026953863,0.0000020500513,0.00036824643,0.000017602864,0.0000053412523,0.057291433,0.94135094,0.00018471612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00341884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011863852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89489037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091428905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013085271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417351","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0002","title":"Definition and Classification","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09341602189408273,"score_gpt":0.30116889132849894,"score_spread":0.20775286943441623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013361442,0.00007435367,0.00036276018,0.0020883433,0.000026981754,0.00013682611,0.000014137802,0.00006298394,0.9972203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022442639,0.00039690253,0.00065450394,0.00012640351,0.00024757077,0.00001037783,0.00006531142,0.0000096784715,0.9760466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956864,0.000005484851,0.00009567099,0.00013569485,0.000124874,0.000069661946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974084,0.000030901963,0.00006033087,0.00008860193,0.00004087271,0.000038430866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000090868045,0.00006053316,0.000061342085,0.000026968868,0.00025206112,0.00005586436,0.000053617296,0.00015561625,0.0004570772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005362935,0.000059405782,0.00002574611,0.000010949508,0.0001360799,0.00004698782,0.000013864325,0.00007839079,0.00028440327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.3630203e-7,0.0000022686,0.000006478298,0.0000018773756,0.0000016342946,1.0333746e-7,0.000053123655,2.698767e-8,0.0000045027427,0.985117,0.012307701,0.002505057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016821909,0.0000018847419,0.00021908943,0.0000048297093,0.000007905907,1.1399461e-7,0.000022704884,0.0000027107026,3.4279944e-7,0.2757251,0.7239402,0.00005831421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005680651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015178897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7116325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004145252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051461047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5004675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388417357","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Character (mathematics); Public law; Political science; Politics; Commercial law; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02062464147757349,"score_gpt":0.2769725278647792,"score_spread":0.25634788638720574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388417357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.473387e-7,0.00003726015,0.00027254006,0.013769504,0.00016433008,0.00011208258,0.0000055090204,0.00009208243,0.98554575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006164303,0.00006451797,0.00016557722,0.00009071162,0.0055374033,0.0000041030776,0.0000270585,0.000009296069,0.9934849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995358,0.0000036976132,0.00008625229,0.00014129307,0.0001501308,0.00008284265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973905,0.000010137158,0.000044424134,0.00012977727,0.000044560224,0.000032078966],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009217858,0.00005848598,0.00006423808,0.000023645682,0.0002223365,0.00003810408,0.0000928277,0.00012992005,0.0070898067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005268684,0.000055581273,0.000047862824,0.000012498239,0.00009779399,0.000038207552,0.000016474813,0.000099173594,0.0015278724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.1737053e-7,0.0000014069499,3.0200016e-7,5.423023e-7,0.0000015814802,9.0550394e-8,0.000024905336,8.5047026e-7,8.3446525e-7,0.66136485,0.337024,0.0015804992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010898141,0.0000017696461,0.0000041367816,0.0000014421145,0.0000067914502,9.6666646e-8,0.000012082177,6.9620637e-7,0.0000018935405,0.061402023,0.9384895,0.00006866175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014615145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019594354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6014655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006643975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006350046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388439435","doi":"10.7202/1092513ar","title":"Les clauses d’assurance et la renonciationà la subrogation : la vision distinctedes tribunaux québécois","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028931950136140413,"score_gpt":0.35008758465190914,"score_spread":0.32115563451576873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388439435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3831717,0.009228272,0.009638103,0.055265546,0.00061032054,0.0007105952,0.00045592227,0.000669934,0.5402496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97792387,0.009104536,0.0028674137,0.00012751944,0.00045908877,0.00013773404,0.00019492363,0.000046245827,0.009138644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943513,0.0031860212,0.0006886594,0.0006007377,0.0006873738,0.00048590574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436194,0.0041607847,0.00051569793,0.0003086868,0.0005135948,0.00013931164],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025748098,0.00038461445,0.00039206698,0.00012307777,0.0010837805,0.00079947006,0.00037234218,0.0005522382,0.00014457638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008945231,0.00038602768,0.00020370127,0.00095815357,0.0014602448,0.0018156669,0.00006473444,0.00053428445,0.0001007506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004644825,0.00055363815,0.026902184,0.00017279181,0.00004995877,0.000010363848,0.003951438,0.0080099655,0.00034916998,0.7877346,0.01077464,0.16144477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032156758,0.00005701621,0.3972252,0.00041742274,0.00007327893,0.000009545024,0.0006024568,0.001108665,0.00022533948,0.019561576,0.5800508,0.00034710468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112646684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18814112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76817304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003354977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041257642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388547292","doi":"10.1515/9781805390879-004","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Berghahn Books","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07772392307382392,"score_gpt":0.32845487895499975,"score_spread":0.25073095588117583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388547292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006805222,0.000104264436,0.000015051305,0.00089741935,0.0004952232,0.00033004902,0.00005686544,0.00031473124,0.9977796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009342977,0.00020075947,0.000056734545,0.00017454475,0.0010243924,0.000037824106,0.000031302603,0.00006333537,0.9974768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881107,0.0000131948855,0.0002125706,0.00031165418,0.00038614747,0.00026539117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992148,0.00007029308,0.00011727051,0.00033814396,0.000096480595,0.0001629704],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022051354,0.0001762819,0.0001931357,0.00007239733,0.0005128288,0.000085247484,0.00039845693,0.00031256708,0.0012408457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028810742,0.00018642307,0.0001541403,0.000029087087,0.0002400022,0.00004937198,0.0001433655,0.00027170018,0.011920039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010252958,0.000004455199,0.0000032583962,0.000005960698,0.00002553842,0.000004684455,0.000459805,2.4913115e-7,0.0000024410094,0.9406716,0.05504126,0.0037797021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053381995,0.0000057785683,0.0000137901625,0.000046798043,0.00002576481,1.530203e-7,0.00004050591,9.252009e-7,0.0000030669573,0.13309146,0.8665359,0.0001824756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029013096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037268535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81149465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013708534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002702242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388682225","doi":"10.1017/9781839703492.002","title":"Analysis of Core Problems in the Classification of Compensation Funds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Framing (construction); Core (optical fiber); Business; Computer science; Actuarial science; Psychology; Engineering; Telecommunications; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13692394437111452,"score_gpt":0.376541666746218,"score_spread":0.23961772237510345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388682225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009092532,0.000022053224,0.00032879322,0.0007211579,0.000022543038,0.00035812496,0.0000400372,0.00005127859,0.99754673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81521344,0.00014095409,0.00005245406,0.00001765877,0.000038216443,0.00004356727,0.000058708592,0.00003548692,0.18439953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993564,0.00005638566,0.00018737852,0.000098337354,0.00023864723,0.000062845465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940556,0.00010680868,0.00024529043,0.0001957446,0.000036442507,0.0000101707465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004874126,0.00004260318,0.00015079646,0.00024495888,0.00003308247,0.000008763261,0.00022588315,0.000092878145,0.0005712401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000287198,0.000029742616,0.00006749384,0.001676675,0.00011401588,0.000015806118,0.000010734131,0.000049895345,0.000013122576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.500843e-7,0.00008251937,0.02406197,0.00002860689,0.0001637165,3.894025e-8,0.006666764,0.00012780892,0.000077135475,0.943782,0.023385225,0.0016236214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085234824,0.000010566272,0.29136506,0.000045575056,0.0003536305,9.413186e-9,0.0075986674,0.0016587562,0.000002026029,0.0011978158,0.69757426,0.000108415785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03115398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30774012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9425841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002330136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047839185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97529763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388714748","doi":"10.1017/9781108995825.004","title":"The Consent Illusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Moral hazard; Incentive; Inequality; Business; Service (business); Hazard; Illusion; Informed consent; Work (physics); Internet privacy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics; Computer science; Marketing; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.06301643130928462,"score_gpt":0.26267491253543535,"score_spread":0.1996584812261507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388714748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021285656,0.00004750145,0.000042241274,0.0006550035,0.00029055992,0.00039852865,0.00012812437,0.00020049202,0.9982163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006828908,0.0010687329,0.000008235446,0.00005305229,0.00022744574,0.0000011114513,0.000013285116,0.000021909851,0.9979233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990416,0.00004711375,0.000107231324,0.0002528205,0.00031025405,0.00024094217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892265,0.00032326623,0.00012868171,0.0003652078,0.00012390336,0.00013630648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023085519,0.00013833606,0.00013127289,0.000040416293,0.0020868338,0.000091889146,0.0005884493,0.00020893964,0.0000042013594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029918629,0.00012656895,0.00014354933,0.000010132024,0.0007258393,0.000032178672,0.0003883827,0.00028392093,0.00013259899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007578502,0.0000016028653,2.2503569e-7,0.0000053871977,0.000024952238,0.000022167278,0.00016855415,7.3484637e-7,0.0000028027805,0.9281685,0.07059933,0.0009981956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008906706,0.0000057453226,0.000007955087,0.000036126443,0.000048922448,4.6100143e-7,0.00034732994,0.000009720978,0.000004516524,0.00015154564,0.9991421,0.00015647824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002243013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048462293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019016313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031804212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389124416","doi":"10.32920/24665610.v1","title":"Decomposing Bhasin v Hrynew : Towards an institutional understanding of the general organizing principle of good faith in contractual performance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Faith; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Good faith; Subject (documents); Fair dealing; Law and economics; Function (biology); Common law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13695317578894114,"score_gpt":0.3741164050743454,"score_spread":0.23716322928540426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389124416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97044444,0.00002077819,0.0039860005,0.0010636082,0.00032976622,0.0004894615,0.000045335724,0.000053217584,0.023567414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972612,0.000068285466,0.001964785,0.00003415375,0.00015119658,0.000015058915,0.00001725141,0.000014372637,0.00047367575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983586,0.000118418124,0.00048468617,0.0002867844,0.0004918826,0.00025963152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999145,0.00007787462,0.00029645013,0.00030751392,0.000104246035,0.00006893081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008898553,0.00013957698,0.00026889387,0.00009959835,0.0004394835,0.00007020436,0.0006568949,0.0001892995,0.00005360488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010983202,0.0001113362,0.00008940886,0.00043879534,0.0003955205,0.00019611036,0.0005424609,0.00039626568,0.0000028913869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009891663,0.000117501346,0.038141936,0.00009139922,0.000028459344,6.218936e-7,0.007237944,0.010801603,0.0011753703,0.94193965,0.000013729574,0.00044187484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017746415,0.00011423449,0.85559505,0.0016004733,0.00014268803,0.0000050733615,0.019459404,0.040997073,0.013215451,0.05175792,0.014006069,0.0013319458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008831914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013599248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8901817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059579033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017887081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99776834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389124568","doi":"10.32920/24665610","title":"Decomposing Bhasin v Hrynew : Towards an institutional understanding of the general organizing principle of good faith in contractual performance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Faith; Supreme court; Political science; Good faith; Subject (documents); Fair dealing; Function (biology); Law and economics; Common law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13695317578894114,"score_gpt":0.3741164050743454,"score_spread":0.23716322928540426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389124568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97044444,0.00002077819,0.0039860005,0.0010636082,0.00032976622,0.0004894615,0.000045335724,0.000053217584,0.023567414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972612,0.000068285466,0.001964785,0.00003415375,0.00015119658,0.000015058915,0.00001725141,0.000014372637,0.00047367575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983586,0.000118418124,0.00048468617,0.0002867844,0.0004918826,0.00025963152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999145,0.00007787462,0.00029645013,0.00030751392,0.000104246035,0.00006893081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008898553,0.00013957698,0.00026889387,0.00009959835,0.0004394835,0.00007020436,0.0006568949,0.0001892995,0.00005360488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010983202,0.0001113362,0.00008940886,0.00043879534,0.0003955205,0.00019611036,0.0005424609,0.00039626568,0.0000028913869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009891663,0.000117501346,0.038141936,0.00009139922,0.000028459344,6.218936e-7,0.007237944,0.010801603,0.0011753703,0.94193965,0.000013729574,0.00044187484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017746415,0.00011423449,0.85559505,0.0016004733,0.00014268803,0.0000050733615,0.019459404,0.040997073,0.013215451,0.05175792,0.014006069,0.0013319458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008831914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013599248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8901817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059579033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017887081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99776834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389125712","doi":"10.18066/inic0153.23","title":"HOLDING FAMILIAR COMO ESPÉCIE DO GÊNERO HOLDING PATRIMONIAL","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09515697557218308,"score_gpt":0.3739652274783799,"score_spread":0.27880825190619685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389125712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6930099,0.0003239797,0.0014783014,0.02235351,0.0026994436,0.0011485051,0.00017613388,0.0013704451,0.27743974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94307476,0.0013290782,0.00014828994,0.00039556803,0.0011835843,0.00004603547,0.000018178609,0.00003882081,0.053765666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697125,0.00015428582,0.00048532104,0.00065844366,0.0007506046,0.0009800668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998528,0.0003463491,0.00016924337,0.0004834947,0.00011019315,0.00036274322],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012434821,0.00027687757,0.00031992715,0.00016974496,0.001992698,0.0005889529,0.00079600234,0.00027095363,0.00074787834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016142179,0.00026742043,0.00026156142,0.0023767455,0.00026459448,0.00036959464,0.00045635548,0.0003898265,0.0043516355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000226181,0.00026729287,0.0121265175,0.00009744684,0.0001525644,0.00005299302,0.04138739,0.0007274042,0.005078426,0.696741,0.20703453,0.036311835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066723244,0.000071414404,0.010515845,0.00010305345,0.000088363544,0.0000015214273,0.052268,0.005121954,0.00061189086,0.004055512,0.9256335,0.0008617471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057052015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001448065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71859896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019405533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024750878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389471831","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary transfer of ownership: One or more ownerships?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.3892765404723455,"score_gpt":0.5765413109259243,"score_spread":0.1872647704535788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389471831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336167,0.00255322,0.00020528588,0.0030898645,0.0003668064,0.0010397116,0.00008486029,0.00004797507,0.0589956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894294,0.0036473249,0.00017326864,0.00038664322,0.00024907634,0.000037425532,0.000008662008,0.00003446007,0.0060337316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705946,0.0003230798,0.0007640452,0.0003988386,0.001003987,0.00045055643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979343,0.000476462,0.00040942366,0.0005343154,0.00033792682,0.0003075682],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019423872,0.00021911968,0.00066177815,0.00034632118,0.0003632263,0.0005656798,0.003118426,0.00016891398,0.028658947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002654464,0.00016920049,0.00023901596,0.0012821304,0.00034762576,0.0019198155,0.0003260217,0.00040081187,0.000070783375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011257309,0.0022346014,0.62924635,0.00062049006,0.00082011597,0.000029368126,0.021173267,0.0003802102,0.19745518,0.056638166,0.04642822,0.04384829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014862076,0.000040636423,0.5845668,0.0008742015,0.00025391424,0.0000040236196,0.006195297,0.00005371517,0.040409155,0.013577732,0.35144427,0.0010940474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056046634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010416881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30501604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010438082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048525713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389583348","doi":"10.5040/9781509967032","title":"Landmark Cases in the Law of Punitive Damages","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Jurisdiction; Damages; Tort; Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.08988678505488328,"score_gpt":0.3311686293048536,"score_spread":0.2412818442499703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389583348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029408382,0.00003576959,0.0000023565965,0.0031069329,0.00014018065,0.0003926113,0.00021849152,0.00008034039,0.9957292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08424864,0.000019886944,0.000022533997,0.00073095056,0.0006066435,0.000095306474,0.00012977196,0.000026951657,0.9141193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998547,0.0002106794,0.00025439102,0.0002170772,0.0005119543,0.00025889164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998035,0.0012490875,0.00018633189,0.0003277321,0.0001462295,0.000055596905],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017111292,0.0001266618,0.00020957516,0.000106832005,0.0004093466,0.0010505562,0.00090469385,0.00023690138,0.00004856795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055713084,0.0000974149,0.00009611554,0.00011264082,0.00045035835,0.00039617773,0.00014763736,0.00057114,0.00003676735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016839575,0.0000087508815,0.000015867603,0.00001871936,0.000009717501,0.00001949268,0.010184898,4.32484e-7,0.0000017557994,0.8596249,0.12941876,0.0006949836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007182841,0.000009256582,0.00012378114,0.00011491214,0.000016857713,0.0000010691566,0.0036564989,8.690633e-7,0.000004924429,0.030591669,0.96529734,0.000110983114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013501571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06557759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8358786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096452015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006146047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389742978","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192874146.003.0017","title":"Challenges for Canadian Unjust Enrichment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Injustice; Liability; Supreme court; Restitution; Law; Political science; Plaintiff; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1512601093629356,"score_gpt":0.3435202673635618,"score_spread":0.19226015800062618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389742978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.9574779e-7,0.0002342755,0.00002683854,0.028748577,0.00021680813,0.00057103497,0.00010544802,0.00010280687,0.969994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016352073,0.0031956225,0.0001200663,0.00031083814,0.0006414909,0.00010573906,0.000036492478,0.000028360035,0.99392617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992255,0.0000041202575,0.0001137471,0.00023108129,0.0001629845,0.00026257287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936676,0.00008652816,0.000041874293,0.00017799222,0.00007417017,0.00025269852],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002326537,0.000102604026,0.000117535266,0.0000778937,0.0005002146,0.000043277476,0.00022934547,0.00021036823,0.0007048992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018839186,0.00009947176,0.000089499044,0.000017913813,0.00006739677,0.000034479566,0.000023647406,0.00008929412,0.00096444215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.5825315e-7,0.0000014276076,2.3718896e-7,0.000007436706,0.00001367463,6.2973504e-7,0.0005758952,3.174916e-7,8.14796e-8,0.9699595,0.017483916,0.011956617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027463866,0.0000071936784,0.000010442399,0.0000105035815,0.000013169231,4.129721e-8,0.00040857363,0.0000015532498,2.2225862e-7,0.12672427,0.87267876,0.00011782982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19098535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9641716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8551948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024034461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006171528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390033730","doi":"10.7202/1106941ar","title":"Quelques points de comparaison entre les deuxplus anciens régimes intégrés d’indemnisationdes victimes d’accidents d’automobile : Québec et Nouvelle-Zélande","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050342645800383556,"score_gpt":0.3467241796945381,"score_spread":0.29638153389415456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390033730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8040586,0.006224993,0.0021342642,0.09912735,0.00088320265,0.0008633507,0.0002543885,0.0013325403,0.08512128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726146,0.01031523,0.0025061897,0.00086867646,0.00039990386,0.00022874659,0.000113251095,0.00005894241,0.012894492],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952613,0.0014174819,0.00073268556,0.0007409241,0.00076876633,0.0010788445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970982,0.0013717393,0.00041843374,0.00034406304,0.000387634,0.00037990327],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023392008,0.00048250557,0.00054272247,0.00024881793,0.001574936,0.0005686485,0.00065477804,0.00043278933,0.0009880612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070943777,0.0004889619,0.00026873205,0.001298691,0.0012055513,0.0014608034,0.00018584808,0.0005775422,0.0010374216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012562617,0.0010176455,0.26281175,0.00043907706,0.00049206516,0.000052307347,0.15949942,0.034654256,0.0008075174,0.17121217,0.10825587,0.2606323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061457016,0.00014759852,0.38468274,0.0005649026,0.00014894061,0.000019348061,0.016310692,0.020865053,0.0010842622,0.012205512,0.5625616,0.00079479715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18390879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23068585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4543057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007064548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012233083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390622066","doi":"10.54648/erpl2023035","title":"Ownership without Owner in the Czech Trust (Sketch on Margo Trust in the Czech Law)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Legislator; Law; Settlor; Civil code; Business; Legislation; Trust law; Fiduciary; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Duty; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04609732989218015,"score_gpt":0.3277203054792472,"score_spread":0.28162297558706706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390622066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12614663,0.0036781488,0.00014656031,0.06313187,0.0004977823,0.0051053357,0.00010542801,0.0006069905,0.8005813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95055705,0.023798464,0.0009638053,0.01791191,0.0011471648,0.00027360267,0.00014692343,0.0002947105,0.00490638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98410463,0.008976144,0.0021846732,0.001435482,0.001494128,0.0018049337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939985,0.0013448261,0.0009562447,0.0031661636,0.00021066124,0.00032360014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020319095,0.00082349736,0.0011523467,0.00033319075,0.00090352865,0.00038088826,0.0064011835,0.00022576327,0.00021113547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027296685,0.0005285861,0.0005761521,0.0048726364,0.0008852164,0.00047818024,0.00087442505,0.0024064917,0.0018030762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005280217,0.0004868412,0.0032329306,0.0014174528,0.000047323054,0.00040671034,0.0071590035,0.000050884955,0.0003877389,0.9732694,0.0046429844,0.00884595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089082605,0.0001798629,0.024187475,0.0031922234,0.00011735781,0.000044695385,0.0012512185,0.0000831429,0.00014734692,0.0019865532,0.96716917,0.0007501187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045614192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004865941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97128284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009262489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021967344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390907656","doi":"10.1515/9781771103435-001","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Villanova University","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.11961491560033279,"score_gpt":0.35575268940746674,"score_spread":0.23613777380713397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390907656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017191551,0.0015559986,0.000035307654,0.00080994115,0.003954853,0.0008362213,0.00005950647,0.000089863555,0.9924864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031777006,0.0012771713,0.00044726933,0.000104899336,0.0017442483,0.00010601918,0.000020738342,0.00003547454,0.99308646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977212,0.000031199063,0.00063108443,0.0004481093,0.0007889722,0.00037943653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978256,0.00014401446,0.00033919187,0.00040817077,0.0010450599,0.00023795216],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052018196,0.0003159266,0.0006637043,0.000094954674,0.00060422096,0.00005153244,0.00058622874,0.0003567211,0.0022126536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060289184,0.0002784712,0.00026026135,0.00002610367,0.0027147983,0.00009918702,0.00034203372,0.00039337296,0.004204886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006978229,0.000026734602,0.000002441391,0.00008604732,0.00034369185,0.000005470735,0.002705102,4.150321e-7,0.000021860626,0.85583013,0.10145149,0.03951963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016436575,0.000020985433,0.000009569982,0.00016942884,0.00013639436,1.9322256e-7,0.0002762669,0.0000013812945,0.00004127183,0.03585258,0.963062,0.00026559734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108937296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00226884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8616105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002044515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002877689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390939528","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0020","title":"Subsidiary and the structure of property law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Public property; Law and economics; Doctrine; Property (philosophy); Law; Private law; Private property; Political science; Common law; Property rights; Public law; Business; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.009040956041293341,"score_gpt":0.23063285207405976,"score_spread":0.2215918960327664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390939528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09299343,0.005175268,0.00022941556,0.010490021,0.00023473012,0.00023619008,0.000049473234,0.000026315309,0.89056516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980663,0.00042792104,0.00023369827,0.000030603056,0.000069321424,7.259652e-9,2.6064984e-7,0.0000013916422,0.0011705116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996585,0.00006379598,0.000050297727,0.000046294135,0.00012056618,0.00006052853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997782,0.00004304687,0.000036984417,0.00004904759,0.000049804446,0.000042923013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001904984,0.000026734662,0.000063467254,0.000003409915,0.00056215416,0.0000326282,0.00015650096,0.000028385102,0.0004357022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004637372,0.00001559869,0.000044657234,0.000018669409,0.00067689316,0.00025325766,0.00003554816,0.00008023958,6.8692015e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016240854,0.000004789567,0.000029253226,0.0000070704045,0.000020937734,0.0000021420497,0.010108771,0.0000022178417,0.00020646983,0.98749983,0.00044439084,0.0016578947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002734092,0.000016316946,0.00026394942,0.000027908973,0.0000414699,0.0000068413333,0.010792965,0.00005717485,0.000079775025,0.0081634475,0.98023665,0.000040075603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2098376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36808872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050957784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000562519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79542416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390957837","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0124","title":"Time for a pluralist approach? Judicial review of non-state decision makers in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Private law; Jurisdiction; Public law; Judicial opinion; Judicial review; Administrative law; Supreme court; Judicial activism; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.010678757702769924,"score_gpt":0.2579974893549134,"score_spread":0.24731873165214346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390957837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09970153,0.043652005,0.016270276,0.012880629,0.0010385247,0.0024378956,0.00072279735,0.00004444641,0.8232519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97684777,0.014351318,0.006663802,0.00021368465,0.00014162615,5.050332e-7,0.000008915493,0.000008593712,0.0017637864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994426,0.000030379255,0.00013341561,0.000075339005,0.00020643763,0.0001118708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996389,0.00006982497,0.0000788543,0.000053935335,0.000086876666,0.00007159938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003836475,0.000039055645,0.0001337235,0.00001077347,0.00021690443,0.0000115283965,0.00020472144,0.000019165487,0.00030344396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017857195,0.000039860246,0.000076075565,0.000053055184,0.000081307226,0.00019204365,0.000025311998,0.000062847634,0.0000012735356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057627173,0.0003793178,0.0006660559,0.004632901,0.0004137369,0.0001670771,0.046348553,0.001097503,0.0006033312,0.36286208,0.37952387,0.20272927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033010473,0.000024876186,0.00047002197,0.0016254564,0.000042468677,0.0000021749684,0.0047201286,0.0012450651,0.0000071742998,0.00052415044,0.9909145,0.00009385082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9829417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87714624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087698526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091676967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33224985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391213619","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4676558","title":"The Nominalism of the New Nominate Torts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"NOMINATE; Nominalism; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.007926539044609387,"score_gpt":0.28855345660282444,"score_spread":0.28062691755821506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391213619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4067844,0.04908562,0.0055563287,0.40943792,0.0035329694,0.0008120745,0.000008056121,0.000116925185,0.12466571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95914716,0.003338896,0.0000097796565,0.000048930382,0.0006417585,0.000002490372,9.443067e-8,0.0000060597185,0.036804862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873084,0.00006992271,0.00014433294,0.000074734504,0.00021656348,0.0007635853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996284,0.0000981981,0.00006288403,0.00012710188,0.00003406993,0.000049345042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015952954,0.00004782644,0.00005067291,0.000014354333,0.00086646626,0.00015127938,0.0004640215,0.000031241263,0.000025077541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054663764,0.000024919746,0.00011308485,0.00020737348,0.00013413852,0.000090090354,0.00003854513,0.00070643274,0.00002071539],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018950158,0.0000041612484,0.000042166852,8.2119624e-7,0.000022275459,2.2054326e-7,0.0012328967,0.0000033164044,0.00008939831,0.9618629,0.0015586321,0.03518131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003397207,0.000011724347,0.00019714201,0.000009805558,0.000015752974,0.000012574731,0.0020918774,0.00001758194,0.00006470983,0.35625127,0.6412616,0.000032032156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016507356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014946295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6397029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003904064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045009237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8340383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391688578","doi":"10.51644/9781554581146-001","title":"Acknowledgements","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.09169232728360258,"score_gpt":0.36970915970327906,"score_spread":0.27801683241967645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391688578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.6226337e-7,0.00007384593,0.00029048463,0.00038278874,0.00024754222,0.00017184157,0.0000058817914,0.0000794192,0.9987474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00012557728,0.00017007517,0.00032120215,0.00028145823,0.00093715347,0.0000031815955,0.000008084842,0.000012400779,0.9981409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993921,0.0000029981095,0.00011025406,0.00013872652,0.0002146166,0.00014133501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995394,0.000025763646,0.00004665625,0.00014684272,0.00015473367,0.000086598695],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002101854,0.000076447526,0.000079307116,0.000038489023,0.00024809,0.000035119443,0.00019837097,0.00017095462,0.07339161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020171468,0.00007214844,0.00006213652,0.000016646598,0.00011442034,0.000032880056,0.000050832994,0.00011760977,0.031353556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.738303e-7,0.0000034838247,0.000002283038,0.000001391335,0.0000069021035,4.716603e-7,0.00016197037,1.8920812e-8,1.8256567e-7,0.89474845,0.092547186,0.012527381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023137447,0.000002326304,0.000006314549,0.000007549486,0.000008266284,2.126011e-8,0.000034479268,2.9727894e-7,0.0000013366597,0.04332029,0.956506,0.00008994494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000661574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004237253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86395884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080484744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009688254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96940064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391964660","doi":"10.51644/9781771120999","title":"Literary Land Claims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literature; History; Art","score_opus":0.046883397183723946,"score_gpt":0.33474638992002603,"score_spread":0.2878629927363021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391964660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004551963,0.00030573705,0.00003230393,0.0017860672,0.00011814066,0.00016339276,0.00003127152,0.000103896324,0.99745464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006102117,0.000070040696,0.00016131469,0.00039723222,0.0011990693,0.000011523469,0.00007014932,0.000010958255,0.9974695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993468,0.000020571566,0.000098813354,0.00014373739,0.0002542866,0.00013578509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995335,0.000036910234,0.00004403715,0.00016945509,0.00007947973,0.00013662051],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002202438,0.00007479414,0.00010530379,0.00002463763,0.0001731615,0.00009287334,0.00023720229,0.00019754947,0.001349125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010590445,0.00006311948,0.000050051367,0.000040517163,0.0000744579,0.00006860672,0.000051988598,0.00015192671,0.0014127027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.342274e-7,0.0000036523577,0.000015351772,0.0000020723164,0.0000032647154,7.0668534e-7,0.00071510306,8.436825e-8,3.166106e-8,0.4991178,0.49879438,0.0013472341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029072633,0.0000033522958,0.0000065041077,0.0000078786625,0.0000054861466,1.2940046e-7,0.000025412508,0.0000015759009,1.1055132e-7,0.20522101,0.794623,0.0000764309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004779732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010295071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29582864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013139642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010263213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392204234","doi":"10.1017/9781009382229.012","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392204234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392733097","doi":"10.1017/9781108874144.025","title":"Subject Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Subject (documents); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.029996437553250176,"score_gpt":0.24683891344977094,"score_spread":0.21684247589652075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392733097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033146127,0.00015552907,0.00009360237,0.0001671697,0.0002490001,0.0003498067,0.00023808173,0.00026578185,0.9984479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008165317,0.00017901606,0.000013890197,0.000053748816,0.00039189044,9.613124e-7,0.00001875284,0.000031727286,0.9911447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989312,0.000021022248,0.00011215468,0.00038582174,0.00030124356,0.0002485089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924207,0.000053705247,0.00008513596,0.0003426295,0.00009667091,0.00017976215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013136085,0.00019330607,0.00019727359,0.00011312862,0.00047648477,0.00011262556,0.00052953605,0.00034824427,0.000023168348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006195569,0.00023005375,0.00019946777,0.000013117077,0.00040286826,0.0000669295,0.00028618294,0.00046694567,0.00018171579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007291191,0.000002957283,0.0000011815188,0.000023445773,0.000050949824,0.000071075716,0.00022932544,5.574494e-7,0.0000028065965,0.9611033,0.037926327,0.0005807698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008651443,0.000007361096,0.0000055265036,0.00006412417,0.000109951834,0.000001112435,0.0001450047,0.00001154178,0.000009952238,0.0002940531,0.9990073,0.0002575746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029494977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016463912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96108097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029804747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028750274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9381319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392770028","doi":"10.1017/9781009414890.013","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392770028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392770221","doi":"10.1017/9781009175166.020","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392770221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392784625","doi":"10.1017/9781009099103.016","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392784625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392788288","doi":"10.1017/9781009099080.021","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"it","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03050789898583455,"score_gpt":0.2649620464377461,"score_spread":0.23445414745191157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392788288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008756202,0.00035731483,0.00050622056,0.00040045244,0.0018802867,0.0007647423,0.001273008,0.00018732491,0.99375504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0598704,0.0007306249,0.000021073909,0.00011922396,0.0010872284,0.0000044522762,0.00008951434,0.000047678972,0.9380298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726593,0.00024402945,0.0002781628,0.0009478054,0.00055634684,0.00070769637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831057,0.00012190866,0.00022428684,0.0006815334,0.0002132033,0.00044847775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024906677,0.0004572335,0.0004795414,0.0001985796,0.0011421632,0.00043338462,0.0014384681,0.00074310554,0.0001024155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015132044,0.0005393331,0.00041641775,0.00015363241,0.00080245564,0.00016376165,0.00096130115,0.001142956,0.004633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018356159,0.000023795226,0.000003035235,0.00012452895,0.00011703046,0.00006301035,0.00062999746,0.000009942662,0.00001675814,0.5424204,0.45614976,0.00042341213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026618625,0.000024336065,0.000034552566,0.0001881009,0.00030771727,0.0000028010577,0.0017240156,0.0002818798,0.00007124729,0.000003962393,0.99650294,0.0005922374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012600927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038510934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5424164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059729634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008377246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393109393","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttae018","title":"Saskatchewan law as a solution to the problem of informal wills in European countries?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Legislation; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Medicine","score_opus":0.012254846817925689,"score_gpt":0.2959057137654629,"score_spread":0.28365086694753716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393109393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31510025,0.00026238148,0.00016529717,0.01700823,0.00014228791,0.0008673736,0.00003472746,0.00015960795,0.6662598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943447,0.00003110626,0.000292942,0.0005808668,0.00018038444,0.00003530706,0.0000035748171,0.000010744609,0.004520334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894774,0.00010207994,0.0002556114,0.00014965488,0.00028601623,0.0002588864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995945,0.0000805801,0.000043956727,0.00016285086,0.00004652473,0.000071549985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093959743,0.000082221864,0.00010144036,0.000052893163,0.00026662924,0.00015981277,0.00032002383,0.00004219952,0.00015605873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018082419,0.000059791444,0.000048475467,0.000378912,0.00020146946,0.00028291848,0.000085973144,0.0001360892,0.0004301313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013166314,0.000027626367,0.0003771323,0.00003850683,0.0000119218685,0.0000035606622,0.10168989,0.00016619085,0.00008734065,0.87959826,0.0017646718,0.016221747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008930963,0.00003332789,0.002883069,0.00007136318,0.0000104683,0.0000011419656,0.006899634,0.00006982266,0.000121227145,0.0016549476,0.9880736,0.00009212177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01612075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062480178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006668171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028409317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393376789","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4779577","title":"The Colour of Jus Cogens","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.011222144337731327,"score_gpt":0.31570357668879306,"score_spread":0.30448143235106173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393376789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5459032,0.070520565,0.00982964,0.14159401,0.0019407967,0.00072774134,0.000025673748,0.00019335505,0.22926499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978788,0.010022798,0.00001131311,0.000028815251,0.00033408144,0.000003880256,2.7109172e-7,0.0000051382963,0.010805692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874914,0.000060150076,0.00012550109,0.00006138619,0.00019436995,0.00080946827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967015,0.00012718931,0.000041142757,0.000067185414,0.000053387463,0.000040943098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018970334,0.000036515146,0.000047603142,0.000019548379,0.0007419958,0.000109503904,0.00025020665,0.000029596618,0.000025802046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056198583,0.000023617047,0.00007243107,0.00020166812,0.00012747593,0.00006508775,0.000016358897,0.00060543226,0.00004153384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022296854,0.0000064709952,0.000051319574,9.493817e-7,0.000033277996,4.300083e-7,0.0007148904,0.0000028081442,0.00010954101,0.98074114,0.0005083579,0.017828582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003573131,0.00002945447,0.000057967958,0.0000055041314,0.000015264488,0.000014441866,0.0056925085,0.000034408098,0.000033364737,0.34319788,0.65085113,0.000032346983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038116134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008307414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65034276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032138304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031711445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5706907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394543627","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.19221720","title":"Anscombe Quarter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0605201179149917,"score_gpt":0.34850613299527994,"score_spread":0.28798601508028826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394543627","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.823407e-8,0.00007437592,1.2236058e-8,0.00062714063,0.00008403236,0.00022237645,0.98336715,0.000046267025,0.015578564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00000470988,0.0000135760265,0.00000194286,0.00047406976,0.00040900803,0.0006263062,0.99679184,0.0000068932036,0.0016716799],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990967,0.000069370246,0.00010498713,0.00020336207,0.00032162713,0.0002039523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936897,0.00008403834,0.000087241744,0.00034086077,0.00003329302,0.00008562676],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005693767,0.00009287457,0.00010326564,0.000034903605,0.00062480493,0.00011415613,0.0006599924,0.00012567008,0.9868175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022661845,0.0000980803,0.000080441416,0.00017848668,0.00000942036,0.000060529706,0.000173629,0.00032951514,0.009068337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.119181e-7,0.00001817193,8.908461e-8,0.000024045718,0.000004366958,0.0000037913417,0.00012906422,4.399657e-7,1.9866302e-8,0.00008413826,0.99965376,0.00008182864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026900494,0.000006877361,0.000008211833,0.00005019084,0.000005854035,2.5142873e-7,0.00017533757,2.3593553e-7,1.14972686e-7,0.000038864026,0.9995568,0.00013040088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012606977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019338732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97774917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008661074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025483378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394600739","doi":"10.1007/s10982-024-09495-3","title":"Why Metaphysics Matters: The Case of Property Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Metaphysics; Property (philosophy); Law; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03936656480920422,"score_gpt":0.30341619074576226,"score_spread":0.26404962593655806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394600739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045883562,0.00064964953,0.00005771374,0.17076208,0.00010920793,0.00023841349,0.000048014354,0.00005524932,0.82349133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894745,0.000021101569,0.000047898255,0.009895523,0.0002950273,0.000014731062,0.0000012392306,0.000004704739,0.0002452719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965006,0.00003867875,0.00007038913,0.00009726262,0.000067172405,0.000076452896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997592,0.000060519367,0.000014485453,0.00011206991,0.000019405023,0.00003431874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001331187,0.000043321124,0.00005818883,0.0000051740526,0.00036521172,0.00009126223,0.00008503654,0.00002254473,0.000030419085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000015555705,0.000021862668,0.000041095383,0.00010836559,0.00041252677,0.000118065866,0.000029531806,0.00006543863,0.000013557344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.73514e-7,0.000011422917,0.0000011624143,0.000023551049,0.000013572661,0.000011553911,0.0020121094,5.0730023e-7,0.000038563372,0.9960259,0.0012400525,0.0006207091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015062667,0.0000068716595,3.6877307e-7,0.000008833729,0.000014999111,0.0000046214273,0.000120819,0.00002153332,0.00005512041,0.3681306,0.63159364,0.00002753728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019127272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028943382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98488617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004895489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013270481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98740447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394706363","doi":"10.1017/9781009416665.010","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394706363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394730773","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4754688","title":"Aboriginal Title and Equity's Darling","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01565876056863776,"score_gpt":0.3800478968045971,"score_spread":0.36438913623595937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394730773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038094506,0.017183132,0.008767087,0.010943453,0.0005055274,0.00008446892,0.0000027618405,0.00010685553,0.92431223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97468084,0.006817675,0.00005125138,0.000029739767,0.00058160705,9.285883e-7,2.733556e-7,0.0000039563674,0.01783373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994205,0.000010639249,0.00003894142,0.00004788979,0.00008405079,0.00039797433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999132,0.000012975959,0.000008138373,0.000023191553,0.00001055475,0.000031894437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056050794,0.00002173996,0.000023300649,0.00001808472,0.00019357655,0.00011862743,0.00006249536,0.000017532679,0.00013434577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000048000916,0.000018444607,0.000016117661,0.000067197325,0.0000298635,0.00006725006,0.000006762,0.00035560055,0.00016381175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.6730186e-7,0.0000016828295,0.000017812621,9.27172e-7,0.000005740932,5.4730884e-7,0.00026430568,2.8095428e-7,0.000022985432,0.96211123,0.0004514358,0.0371228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013906905,0.0000061668757,0.000011344865,0.0000042658844,0.000004500838,0.00001131401,0.00040763518,0.000029182589,0.0000026700725,0.23604256,0.76344436,0.000022107044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012609539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006157853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9365863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001668696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010820024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21055233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394960846","doi":"10.1017/9781009380362.014","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394960846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395030898","doi":"10.29173/alr2709","title":"Tort Claims Against Public Authorities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.05163741507831677,"score_gpt":0.33421153037904755,"score_spread":0.2825741153007308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395030898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086346135,0.023454411,0.000005677,0.07208233,0.00021222753,0.0005381354,0.000012528252,0.000055578475,0.90277565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.881097,0.0424101,0.00008083476,0.027657064,0.00034098854,0.00093482726,0.00007126691,0.000022645898,0.047385264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988214,0.00021988689,0.00020742812,0.00018445496,0.0003149642,0.0002518697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993542,0.00013799354,0.000072493,0.0002766077,0.00004082477,0.00011791353],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006725994,0.00007329076,0.0001660353,0.0000113590195,0.0016337885,0.00007392835,0.00043931592,0.0000215847,0.002650912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008717486,0.000070688286,0.00010781623,0.00034609972,0.0001282714,0.00016950794,0.00016382503,0.00014958593,0.00021480706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7081992e-7,0.000024646597,0.0000557782,0.00006227224,0.0000059712856,5.4134426e-7,0.00033628228,3.7635175e-7,0.0000011468579,0.9749992,0.019419491,0.005094143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029047547,0.0000068238587,0.000020558986,0.000052862117,0.000013701391,7.941476e-7,0.00022991715,0.000002723458,5.833286e-7,0.0016026982,0.99794203,0.00009823477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014489667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015917521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97852254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106165266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016378587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031225","doi":"10.29173/alr2751","title":"The Thing and Judicial Methodology in Resolving Novel Property Claims: It Matters When It Matters","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1663550262980293,"score_gpt":0.3978192138991151,"score_spread":0.2314641876010858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005274221,0.0038871213,0.00007176316,0.9569171,0.00014678651,0.00086721714,0.000002698153,0.000036884725,0.03754298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04552184,0.19381899,0.0053268895,0.72106826,0.00081202906,0.0011376237,0.00003113323,0.000113424256,0.03216982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984154,0.00043628665,0.00034202673,0.00026506788,0.00018100216,0.00036020653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977965,0.0017531964,0.00010318635,0.00024740252,0.00002820874,0.000071512666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029074608,0.00010370967,0.00025314293,0.000021241138,0.0007834264,0.00011177827,0.00038217165,0.00005962235,0.000091487665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044649758,0.000061865634,0.000060307375,0.00033636924,0.00029401146,0.00016842566,0.00016814028,0.00018752165,0.00017211409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060999128,0.000022782382,0.00027695106,0.00049849116,0.00003444947,0.0000032063815,0.0150982635,0.000003142472,0.00018267085,0.7555921,0.21192192,0.016359923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069826594,0.000004518883,0.0001283187,0.00072199135,0.000024133176,0.0000016849848,0.00068735576,0.000030714837,0.00000223277,0.0021590076,0.99607027,0.00009996656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09195254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16892116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78414834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004887222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060880768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9140942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031238","doi":"10.29173/alr2752","title":"The Invention of Advantage: Annapolis Group v. Halifax Regional Municipality and Canadian De Facto Expropriation Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; De facto; Law; Political science; Group (periodic table); Business; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05122016600391824,"score_gpt":0.35614310550210554,"score_spread":0.3049229394981873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088824674,0.046223238,0.000031218246,0.22215942,0.00032551604,0.0035659717,0.00016716051,0.00012814572,0.63857466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477209,0.04868935,0.000027900338,0.0023698742,0.000054358043,0.0000805209,0.000063009364,0.000006574576,0.0009875444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991292,0.00019782325,0.00019597425,0.000118340766,0.00014754049,0.00021113238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999295,0.00021353319,0.00009404466,0.00020467985,0.000054707078,0.00013804609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095253123,0.00005602324,0.00011161098,0.000011325559,0.0007364792,0.000039253646,0.0001773213,0.000043003252,0.00003454791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015639258,0.000042865784,0.00005533746,0.00025943745,0.000244282,0.0001339722,0.000031178533,0.000065141125,0.0000288146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.302223e-7,0.0000044634785,0.00031164565,0.000089078225,0.000005787615,1.3844745e-7,0.000597583,1.8913234e-7,0.000009988703,0.99575484,0.0015449845,0.0016807495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003633515,0.0000047779595,0.0010672202,0.00017638005,0.000018468338,4.114704e-7,0.00020269596,0.000011449259,0.0000043497316,0.0127885835,0.9856374,0.00005187891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94918925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000646941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011072369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5664477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067284","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1365","title":"Modernizing Non-Profit Law in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Profit (economics); Law; Business; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.042705371106519466,"score_gpt":0.30109568127793307,"score_spread":0.2583903101714136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1020782,0.000016900196,0.000022989045,0.0072391005,0.0003042489,0.00011091285,0.000027422577,0.000033660523,0.8901666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987892,0.000040818923,0.000092553215,0.00046966365,0.0001591984,0.0000066631096,0.0000012396375,0.000007352893,0.00043330502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908274,0.00004215432,0.00016441064,0.000094089766,0.00029748786,0.00031914175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996411,0.000045126137,0.00005111208,0.00007767764,0.00004140194,0.00014357861],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042593133,0.000051075876,0.00008125551,0.000023764858,0.0029221282,0.000059653405,0.00022058601,0.000028617862,0.00009114653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015737198,0.00004840845,0.000029804018,0.00026827992,0.00004757206,0.00015728177,0.000041504474,0.00022637805,0.000069171256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014737151,0.000003969785,0.0010472885,0.0000019628915,0.0000043115274,0.000042394495,0.00034731106,0.00071863236,0.00004060062,0.9957331,0.00064805883,0.001410896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013666447,0.0000032264543,0.0016602102,0.000014846279,0.0000025891864,0.0000042503943,0.0017327259,0.0007378726,0.00010209598,0.0052207764,0.99029464,0.00009011711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99004984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004834242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015520852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395085984","doi":"10.1017/9781009243728.020","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395085984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395086076","doi":"10.1017/9781009110129.022","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"it","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03050789898583455,"score_gpt":0.2649620464377461,"score_spread":0.23445414745191157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395086076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008756202,0.00035731483,0.00050622056,0.00040045244,0.0018802867,0.0007647423,0.001273008,0.00018732491,0.99375504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0598704,0.0007306249,0.000021073909,0.00011922396,0.0010872284,0.0000044522762,0.00008951434,0.000047678972,0.9380298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726593,0.00024402945,0.0002781628,0.0009478054,0.00055634684,0.00070769637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831057,0.00012190866,0.00022428684,0.0006815334,0.0002132033,0.00044847775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024906677,0.0004572335,0.0004795414,0.0001985796,0.0011421632,0.00043338462,0.0014384681,0.00074310554,0.0001024155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015132044,0.0005393331,0.00041641775,0.00015363241,0.00080245564,0.00016376165,0.00096130115,0.001142956,0.004633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018356159,0.000023795226,0.000003035235,0.00012452895,0.00011703046,0.00006301035,0.00062999746,0.000009942662,0.00001675814,0.5424204,0.45614976,0.00042341213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026618625,0.000024336065,0.000034552566,0.0001881009,0.00030771727,0.0000028010577,0.0017240156,0.0002818798,0.00007124729,0.000003962393,0.99650294,0.0005922374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012600927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038510934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5424164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059729634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008377246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395086319","doi":"10.1017/9781009343756.016","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395086319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395087454","doi":"10.1017/9781108891349.043","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395087454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089469","doi":"10.1017/9781009473194.033","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089508","doi":"10.1017/9781108953535.020","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Warwick","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395089536","doi":"10.1017/9781108953535.013","title":"Competing in the Market: Acumen in Business and Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024878589041829432,"score_gpt":0.2386001175314982,"score_spread":0.21372152848966877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395089536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046549807,0.00014001955,0.0000046778996,0.0006266872,0.00005076995,0.00036771584,0.000056346096,0.0000317792,0.9982565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038359284,0.00020818309,0.000015385229,0.00011285663,0.00009304574,0.0000015830605,0.000006532158,0.0000121888925,0.96119094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992406,0.00005508549,0.00010501114,0.0002554102,0.00017023897,0.00017365356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995462,0.00013776618,0.00005390195,0.00017733953,0.000040611136,0.000044226163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035978472,0.00012561295,0.00015262756,0.00007851027,0.00025663045,0.00011384762,0.0003827351,0.00015556163,0.0000049320015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006731369,0.00011917856,0.000038638962,0.000025893287,0.00038306395,0.00006760232,0.00022880289,0.00034832,0.0000055920063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007006776,0.0000036741126,0.0000066008834,0.000034897475,0.0000075983394,0.00007851317,0.0014899061,5.922283e-7,0.0000018348436,0.99674237,0.0014053324,0.00022166892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012125533,0.0000025112263,0.0001547908,0.00014458274,0.000027279153,0.0000013948991,0.0012646832,0.000016110218,8.7832825e-7,0.00026572356,0.99786305,0.00013774858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01160691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033762557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99647665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012782523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000762611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396593081","doi":"10.1093/9780191994487.001.0001","title":"The King Can Do No Wrong","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Liability; Common law; Harm; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.024956259597979057,"score_gpt":0.3159320671367518,"score_spread":0.2909758075387728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396593081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000015095573,0.00048479508,0.00001232387,0.0074835666,0.00046030155,0.00018376109,0.000013286089,0.00010028855,0.9912602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016396284,0.0003718549,0.00003186156,0.0002028902,0.0015939203,0.000025887759,0.00000586165,0.0000140329485,0.9961141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992887,0.000017671142,0.00010561035,0.00016225869,0.00024417654,0.00018161743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995239,0.0001401634,0.000036509395,0.00019103667,0.00005047726,0.000057915695],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003010428,0.00007617369,0.00006896347,0.000013889828,0.00090630987,0.0004537766,0.00037139523,0.0001151491,0.0006589837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000242894,0.000047214842,0.000077494224,0.000045190864,0.00017308576,0.000022460163,0.000095452015,0.00025153407,0.002550799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.0037481e-7,7.426584e-7,7.403017e-7,0.0000032765354,0.0000069882735,4.9859426e-7,0.00065117166,2.0583104e-7,2.612874e-7,0.7615785,0.23466904,0.003088467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006904668,0.0000016703524,0.000002032448,0.000020112477,0.000010516732,8.074557e-8,0.00031797605,0.0000047234207,3.158924e-7,0.056209113,0.9433548,0.00007176169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027378765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023733653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70868576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002095304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078109343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396595538","doi":"10.1017/9781009365987.009","title":"General Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.030248537880839272,"score_gpt":0.24812278949829283,"score_spread":0.21787425161745355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396595538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004958547,0.00013100244,0.00011023013,0.00018669001,0.0002682349,0.00030066606,0.00023826648,0.00022375204,0.9984916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027304762,0.00015542805,0.000031281208,0.000072099,0.000605046,9.192614e-7,0.000021954786,0.000029576579,0.9963532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899775,0.00001774704,0.00010570467,0.00036316912,0.00027879493,0.00023686507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993179,0.000029308158,0.00007703104,0.00030380365,0.00008963152,0.0001823361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009764311,0.00018152478,0.00018064304,0.00009567737,0.00044622348,0.00010647031,0.00048717254,0.00032924084,0.000023086412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000036738268,0.00021614663,0.00018324303,0.0000103458915,0.0003678954,0.00006153697,0.00028931556,0.0004157425,0.00014463218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051686284,0.0000026430673,8.357439e-7,0.000016875612,0.000046627112,0.000062363484,0.00017164768,0.0000013203149,0.0000038583103,0.94529784,0.053806987,0.000583859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083445215,0.0000059352797,0.000004595525,0.000042846368,0.00009646337,0.0000010139636,0.000077188444,0.00003119968,0.0000080692225,0.00031674068,0.99908733,0.00024518318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028044179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010451895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027394126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024272164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8814204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396596000","doi":"10.1093/9780191994487.003.0006","title":"Revisiting and Understanding Crown Liability from a Historical Constitutional Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Liability; Crown (dentistry); Political science; History; Law; Art; Visual arts; Medicine","score_opus":0.09385856750221917,"score_gpt":0.3248453910475894,"score_spread":0.23098682354537026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396596000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007721438,0.0015890992,0.0030865143,0.010665795,0.00017614388,0.0001875842,0.00008692896,0.00010484393,0.9840954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11583465,0.00030177712,0.000544134,0.0001282287,0.0014407156,0.000008125398,0.000012456882,0.000012613329,0.8817173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990354,0.000013073817,0.00016919513,0.00040069572,0.00025430464,0.00012732566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993681,0.00027022217,0.000057820613,0.00011383566,0.00007864076,0.000111426714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025010546,0.00012267538,0.00017790055,0.000038979015,0.000565346,0.00014947761,0.00009270373,0.00018936922,0.0014950911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084424304,0.00011446475,0.00009221495,0.00002966279,0.0008972159,0.000073609604,0.00008715575,0.00031432617,0.000094319366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019746278,0.0000026470218,0.0000137168045,0.0000071640484,0.000025390598,0.000003058859,0.0011801037,1.8235501e-7,0.0000013393441,0.99739254,0.0012674998,0.000104395636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019450232,0.000001928997,0.0000037251307,0.000043398642,0.00002963913,3.4518945e-7,0.0010844778,0.0000072856906,1.0810899e-7,0.49492958,0.50379527,0.00008479794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052008224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089219376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5025278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045740665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034878746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686540","doi":"10.29173/mlj1132","title":"Jeremy Bentham and Canadian Evidence Law: The Utilitarian Perspective on Mistrial Applications","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jeremy bentham; Perspective (graphical); Law; Utilitarianism; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.039236506673517794,"score_gpt":0.31507943767699476,"score_spread":0.27584293100347695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1299467,0.0006332592,0.00007792635,0.07339739,0.00050706876,0.0013814546,0.00004507023,0.000038815884,0.7939723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975005,0.000082860664,0.00005403901,0.0010724515,0.0010249456,0.000028341088,8.533149e-7,0.000006770792,0.0002292651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990236,0.00011504861,0.00013759291,0.00017531183,0.00027244195,0.00027599628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910796,0.00020209755,0.00007066126,0.00020279134,0.00013729287,0.00027920687],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006053824,0.00008043495,0.000083666695,0.000025436486,0.0029198325,0.0004052066,0.00037551747,0.000057932153,0.0002304652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005027056,0.00006024335,0.000055931225,0.00012073822,0.0003077021,0.0002038192,0.000028811512,0.00033514798,0.00019611004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000701229,0.000013299408,0.0004575364,0.0000011052889,0.0000111232575,0.0000012154693,0.0015513115,0.000005158082,0.00000996731,0.99595946,0.0004127202,0.0015700774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018195866,0.000039514623,0.0025860493,0.000025342559,0.000020571639,0.000012621304,0.059627898,0.000015448479,0.000010349113,0.038817596,0.8985504,0.000112242284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86215794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98358655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000506105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002702888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686911","doi":"10.29173/mlj1323","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada and the Development of a Canadian Common Law of Contract","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Common law; Political science; Precedent","score_opus":0.028320569475101188,"score_gpt":0.2615189508743444,"score_spread":0.2331983813992432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336216,0.000104123676,0.0000026309597,0.011006315,0.00015412379,0.00017439993,0.000023508472,0.0000031634445,0.054910127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970806,0.00006163925,0.00003085884,0.000096081,0.000043799184,0.0000031794066,5.8637744e-7,0.0000026813334,0.00005310686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918383,0.000082076,0.00025615154,0.000036260986,0.000271855,0.0001698303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993021,0.0002554486,0.00015064234,0.00007845888,0.00011333095,0.000100052646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012553395,0.000036735157,0.0001028869,0.00002092061,0.0014140204,0.00003648247,0.00024466836,0.00001952429,0.000011680054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028357294,0.000021454889,0.000024047991,0.00017053021,0.00043048317,0.00003280671,0.000025271422,0.000102133345,4.860175e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011724974,0.00000632447,0.0017875406,0.0000049968107,0.000038882892,0.0000017906785,0.0045503085,0.000013814852,0.000043001768,0.9894044,0.0020600662,0.0020771925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048156624,0.000010443607,0.038212404,0.000031484546,0.000020811698,0.000005013766,0.042802487,0.00005361395,0.0006034535,0.009672004,0.9080335,0.000073251525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99879056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97973233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008525746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010474016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396714799","doi":"10.29173/mlj1344","title":"Secrecy and Impunity: The Role of Law Societies in Canadian Wrongful Convictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Secrecy; Law; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.02248355761863561,"score_gpt":0.2834340914860085,"score_spread":0.2609505338673729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396714799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7336563,0.0001854255,0.0000041853714,0.01308696,0.00013624555,0.00014401916,0.000023494835,0.000022076785,0.25274128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991631,0.00015332944,0.000013703545,0.00030737248,0.00020888443,0.0000067489555,0.0000014533701,0.000004489754,0.00014090343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999335,0.00008779101,0.00012853713,0.000057473313,0.00014409433,0.00024710363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996004,0.00007952487,0.00004615002,0.00007127628,0.00005521336,0.00014744943],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007094122,0.000042982276,0.0000660087,0.000038405145,0.0017746433,0.00013735397,0.00016736379,0.000044386117,0.00007121608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019777133,0.000033755638,0.000033757813,0.00021252838,0.00035405732,0.00011928458,0.000031470936,0.00022190569,0.000017720828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.393789e-7,0.0000059647,0.0062932167,0.000001379232,0.000007093813,0.0000017163422,0.005629593,0.0000154365,0.000024291692,0.9854685,0.00024922134,0.0023029235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000788091,0.00000813903,0.012455752,0.000007850195,0.000007392467,0.000006408155,0.118388884,0.0000828724,0.000024673252,0.119019315,0.74986863,0.00005129245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94129777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99802846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86644924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010335569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018260545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715387","doi":"10.29173/mlj1278","title":"A Deposit in a Pre-Incorporation Transaction is Still a Deposit: A Comment on Benedetto v 2453912 Ontario Inc","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Database transaction; Law; Supreme court; Inclusion (mineral); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Chemistry; Computer science","score_opus":0.028134171894525203,"score_gpt":0.27279471984873666,"score_spread":0.24466054795421144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672673,0.000030248142,0.0016158024,0.017288418,0.00031683533,0.0005396342,0.00001519482,0.000036574278,0.012890041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453425,0.000015689864,0.00027917276,0.004760543,0.00018482849,0.00011116382,0.000006936093,0.000011487906,0.00009594873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983681,0.00023691801,0.00032461277,0.00019094974,0.00061034807,0.00026907385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994701,0.000040454463,0.00017278816,0.00013412496,0.00004891557,0.00013362519],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059148105,0.00010964894,0.00012834168,0.00008626374,0.0022035448,0.00026060696,0.00027444615,0.000045669156,0.0003021441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000046952214,0.00011463777,0.00008058082,0.00023468632,0.00004450908,0.00026539943,0.000042531803,0.0006512279,0.000015561634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015541387,0.005223568,0.0748248,0.00005234236,0.0002630219,0.00043480375,0.35991612,0.01720564,0.0015741993,0.41015676,0.009673671,0.119120955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015920206,0.0006870382,0.055341985,0.000062068444,0.000074890726,0.00013137155,0.022723032,0.0008871996,0.0006491348,0.013376922,0.90400153,0.00047282837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82422894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8943278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00229543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001605697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396715396","doi":"10.29173/mlj1276","title":"The Premier Should Not Also Be the Attorney General: Roncarelli v Duplessis Revisited as a Cautionary Tale in Legal Ethics and Professionalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.11005269162942016,"score_gpt":0.3810515904134437,"score_spread":0.27099889878402356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396715396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6458156,0.0021229626,0.00002361056,0.328774,0.00062632916,0.0006693151,0.00006271615,0.000038652994,0.021866815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897228,0.0006170573,0.00006443472,0.007056413,0.0006149886,0.000108092885,0.000008414063,0.000014249396,0.0017935884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693596,0.0013277461,0.0003044248,0.00018803749,0.0009252294,0.00031861156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987534,0.00065901777,0.00017131105,0.00020011852,0.00011630134,0.00009983079],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004094926,0.000106789375,0.000115013114,0.000028177617,0.012220675,0.00039712415,0.00056147657,0.00009395342,0.00021445795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020174496,0.00006685848,0.00007673629,0.0002745381,0.00041643175,0.00020051897,0.00033908075,0.002029564,0.0000062711306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029689165,0.000056254594,0.0010576167,0.0000047232643,0.000021744165,0.00002558435,0.0086114295,0.00017575797,0.0001119918,0.9802962,0.007529228,0.0020797956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017757947,0.000017647351,0.00450801,0.000015722148,0.00001760492,0.00007066406,0.03535198,0.00016636077,0.000014647894,0.0068538296,0.9527016,0.00010432688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0366892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091117926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003216549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000380474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396975299","doi":"10.1017/9781009354059.015","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396975299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398193230","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4764926","title":"Introduction to The King Can Do No Wrong - Constitutional Fundamentals, Common Law History, and Crown Liability","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Crown (dentistry); Liability; Constitutional law; Common law; Tort; Political science","score_opus":0.013772361982716879,"score_gpt":0.2828532760666811,"score_spread":0.26908091408396423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398193230","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3882675,0.025954997,0.008981581,0.45001328,0.006378915,0.0014124354,0.000051384122,0.00030378986,0.11863614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99351877,0.00053876464,0.000031322386,0.0003100927,0.0027683275,0.000012521215,0.0000025561524,0.0000049308965,0.0028126999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986412,0.0001116073,0.00015117996,0.00018536855,0.00023528395,0.00067536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996568,0.000054887812,0.000037488826,0.00010664234,0.000055342734,0.00008885554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021273785,0.00007078972,0.000073589326,0.000029338085,0.0011267634,0.00024227749,0.00017134991,0.0000375987,0.00021497128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003687722,0.00005354441,0.000046417324,0.0001021098,0.00059674255,0.00017919505,0.000039780054,0.0008156577,0.00006251312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062423806,0.000013998723,0.00018872741,0.0000027117694,0.000020960108,3.7079218e-7,0.0013706906,0.000022182461,0.00012271178,0.99085367,0.0030262736,0.00437145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004618734,0.000032989283,0.00013593295,0.000008232636,0.000014387483,0.00003807155,0.0017805286,0.000031160274,0.0000063826874,0.06735669,0.93048203,0.00006741806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003679234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037239768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9274557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035025298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020793055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9803281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398195909","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttae029","title":"Grin and bare it: the recent kerfuffle over bare trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Law and economics; Law; Settlor; Business; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Duty","score_opus":0.030175455780343096,"score_gpt":0.35613617721505175,"score_spread":0.32596072143470867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398195909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53411514,0.0070828903,0.000053945656,0.10168148,0.0012255794,0.0011977311,0.00013014332,0.0006086277,0.3539045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869661,0.002078388,0.00007616992,0.0009832234,0.0006882102,0.000084874686,0.000009285437,0.000026270996,0.009087526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984315,0.00012755784,0.00023415659,0.00039140196,0.00041011968,0.00040528533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991746,0.00024757616,0.000020400972,0.00032512794,0.00005934978,0.00017296369],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000531955,0.00017128902,0.0001602398,0.000054077493,0.0008643069,0.0005361982,0.0003756425,0.00012572881,0.0027095173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010144937,0.00011821995,0.00008309988,0.00039767587,0.00032349705,0.00028627284,0.00013570381,0.00028652255,0.00024770157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023565459,0.000085780135,0.0037229203,0.00010187552,0.0000941596,0.000025578664,0.03837621,0.000029415653,0.00022489401,0.71738267,0.11979154,0.12014139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001295774,0.000016946684,0.009373262,0.000046873785,0.000039456776,0.0000036101878,0.004513613,0.00021683061,0.00009746724,0.0027910825,0.98259336,0.00017790511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015060072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039356337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86280185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011180373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019253194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398352792","doi":"10.7910/dvn/gjetme","title":"Petition of Isaac Rice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.02509888228613531,"score_gpt":0.3073245479805167,"score_spread":0.2822256656943814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398352792","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020944473,9.981896e-7,0.000025015499,0.00002968434,0.0002944889,0.00020479482,0.9914486,0.000024887026,0.007950576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00003881126,0.00049230905,0.00019267098,0.00027407997,0.00072998175,0.000018898127,0.9975766,0.0000066526645,0.00067001017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888325,0.00008822087,0.00021326919,0.000245535,0.00037139136,0.00019830796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987503,0.00006823332,0.00022574425,0.00072713953,0.00013083595,0.00009773495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040098626,0.0001111917,0.00016959681,0.00006703052,0.00028207933,0.00005217044,0.0006637016,0.00018976844,0.02506635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002237667,0.000113821894,0.00007314153,0.00019924092,0.0003836523,0.00019683827,0.00019585635,0.00015247283,0.057997007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004398643,0.000051656214,0.0000012104508,0.00003948491,0.000013359363,0.0000015734561,0.00012420188,1.4364275e-7,0.000011826149,0.0024301382,0.9972889,0.000033099972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008451811,0.000015174939,0.000021838954,0.00003200854,0.000057744826,3.675225e-7,0.00021466022,8.947406e-7,0.00001331256,0.0001575513,0.99927765,0.0001242961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011302128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040800446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032930657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067304616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025081277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398759315","doi":"10.1017/9781009170628.018","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398759315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398768347","doi":"10.29173/mlj830","title":"Shareholder Proposals Mechanism under the Manitoba Corporations Act: A Proposal for Reform","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechanism (biology); Shareholder; Business; Accounting; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.051016998219173,"score_gpt":0.29966820036307645,"score_spread":0.24865120214390346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398768347","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3349407,0.00017857976,0.032244604,0.35406467,0.0032048628,0.013697215,0.00018677361,0.0005994152,0.26088318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921368,0.000026610116,0.0033906286,0.0014351297,0.0017256967,0.0004927294,0.00001097048,0.000028991688,0.00075245945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984058,0.00011205467,0.0003522057,0.00017199312,0.00048255944,0.00047538802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873024,0.000084334526,0.00024505032,0.00025799248,0.00047299132,0.00020936094],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008227363,0.00015088423,0.00014226281,0.000038948376,0.004904195,0.0012134007,0.0006425991,0.00011099673,0.00045749132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032771753,0.00009523163,0.00014661929,0.00018043442,0.00027166968,0.00074523134,0.00008206515,0.00036019666,0.0003173336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038885432,0.000066626824,0.00003836546,0.00000479481,0.000027437776,9.692839e-7,0.0007208852,0.000005068796,0.00024707447,0.99104744,0.0040115933,0.0038258566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035989878,0.00007625922,0.00096786866,0.000022180771,0.00004770812,0.000043260203,0.11358066,0.0001307094,0.00034953977,0.7567534,0.12743737,0.00023118936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048059385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4869565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65719604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041739026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004155014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398768359","doi":"10.29173/mlj865","title":"Billy, Don't You Lose My Number: Law Reform with Respect to the Serial Numbered Goods Regime under the Manitoba PPSA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Business; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.026501834425016493,"score_gpt":0.2821237528783797,"score_spread":0.25562191845336324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398768359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3628049,0.00004731397,0.00017666085,0.101555824,0.00082366285,0.0011642026,0.000019281071,0.00011291397,0.5332953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890358,0.000057416346,0.00048650993,0.0043666973,0.0045164344,0.00010461703,0.0000031702552,0.00004204482,0.001387315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729043,0.0003456304,0.00041603908,0.0003176554,0.00091182,0.000718408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982873,0.00013047575,0.00025805546,0.00067886256,0.00028081043,0.00036449637],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012532959,0.00024854476,0.00022476168,0.000025059551,0.005137675,0.0017234602,0.0013891432,0.00012893214,0.0008891928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026165751,0.00012366727,0.000149761,0.000463344,0.0006605762,0.0006121202,0.00022067943,0.0007178242,0.0013748121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006961021,0.00008607334,0.00043195652,0.0000032556286,0.000084718304,0.000013438886,0.0029119872,0.00005570799,0.00006703632,0.9810875,0.012762555,0.0024261477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004898614,0.000085301304,0.0028520671,0.000034823526,0.000053150692,0.00018019123,0.09151327,0.000008506695,0.00009150409,0.02750291,0.87690127,0.00028716354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42961323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8937138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006188059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017988656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020550","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.069","title":"16 January 1753. Cleland to Edward Dickinson","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.020184684533509713,"score_gpt":0.34409890183181024,"score_spread":0.32391421729830056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000068981262,0.00044480312,0.00040621965,0.008242445,0.0004128572,0.00037557943,0.000049611415,0.00040783285,0.98965377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015200604,0.00019240975,0.00041881975,0.00083309965,0.0016288324,0.00005269767,0.000010168304,0.00012795914,0.99521595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999182,0.000022807033,0.00009141609,0.00026964257,0.00022988726,0.00020423546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958247,0.000015440193,0.000027452214,0.00020904317,0.000012152788,0.00015342208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013187953,0.00010672847,0.00012611346,0.00008945888,0.00008502823,0.00011537329,0.0002604032,0.00018210785,0.008334615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001650719,0.00008688648,0.00006564771,0.00022694784,0.000057213187,0.000019783583,0.00008470492,0.00012949115,0.017638905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8950338e-7,0.000008386892,0.000016194539,0.000010208044,0.00001069504,0.0000011369867,0.00043992634,6.245353e-8,8.8616235e-7,0.14823054,0.8488344,0.0024471544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022557799,0.00000636909,0.000017984952,0.000049032536,0.000014134348,1.1298427e-7,0.00035470736,3.96587e-7,0.0000020397993,0.001953336,0.9974433,0.00013602263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02615517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042717557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1486089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076216915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009663379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020592","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.140","title":"An Unsigned Note by Cleland, [1757–1766]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012981545666430016,"score_gpt":0.36270809901534784,"score_spread":0.34972655334891783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000032646312,0.00046176123,0.00076349376,0.0024342889,0.0002608505,0.0002431195,0.00012455421,0.0005352819,0.9951734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029558982,0.00019310633,0.0005050614,0.00041899298,0.000972322,0.000028051923,0.000050946812,0.0001786272,0.994697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913996,0.000041825053,0.00009804744,0.00029504724,0.00022006396,0.00020507525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995292,0.000015292428,0.000041945732,0.0002615377,0.000012981213,0.00013907856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015184369,0.000117474425,0.00012511699,0.000050025854,0.00010940231,0.00016564039,0.000313693,0.00026017413,0.012498602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000078517605,0.00009695875,0.000056481265,0.00017142115,0.000111069414,0.000040265888,0.000029313307,0.00013834515,0.006369478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.825719e-7,0.000016868333,0.000002335792,0.0000068334166,0.000007986739,7.573139e-7,0.00038348546,5.1385488e-8,0.000024757168,0.15873261,0.8392149,0.0016089863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004071127,0.00000809923,0.000001231577,0.00001655445,0.000017751396,8.001978e-8,0.0002582336,0.000008370118,0.00000865396,0.002180026,0.9973061,0.00015417096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024123086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022583839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15809117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040726096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010607687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020603","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.054","title":"24 November 1749. Letter from Lovel Stanhope to John Sharpe Enclosing Bonds Relating to Individuals Committed to Appear before the Court of King’s Bench","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Bond; Operations research; Genealogy; Engineering; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.029619966203072563,"score_gpt":0.31639406379550766,"score_spread":0.2867740975924351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020011947,0.00013576206,0.00107499,0.07044117,0.0004376979,0.0015120271,0.0009454193,0.00020107577,0.9232507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040704682,0.000006141825,0.010945815,0.018187638,0.002024469,0.00012668414,0.000064724314,0.00034820315,0.9275916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973708,0.00009039259,0.0004979384,0.0006286513,0.0009015925,0.0005106232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986396,0.00012326815,0.00019567597,0.0006728733,0.00008942714,0.0002791838],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007248437,0.00031605392,0.0004190723,0.00022414453,0.0003013386,0.00035416085,0.001006027,0.00032684603,0.008535871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014912081,0.0002325515,0.00012898583,0.0009975089,0.000115286864,0.00007537747,0.000660383,0.0004979445,0.0021161714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018484075,0.00003005255,0.0007797637,0.000019768562,0.00010241625,0.0000013631222,0.015562535,0.00001755554,0.00019932023,0.027164357,0.95506996,0.0010510577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000716807,0.000030718184,0.00062481384,0.00044131192,0.00008030095,1.5878308e-7,0.0018994319,0.000014270884,0.000036867823,0.0008769537,0.9956372,0.00028632866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051231455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05314127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052253533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014951786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013353203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020606","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.145","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020812","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.020","title":"10 February 1736. William Cleland to the Court of Directors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.02008791278118498,"score_gpt":0.31304699409017134,"score_spread":0.29295908130898635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022734264,0.0005054516,0.000030704763,0.006833057,0.00021611093,0.00033001025,0.00006913047,0.00012468427,0.99186814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046419725,0.00013349057,0.00009736816,0.0001855476,0.0006951149,0.00003202305,0.0000044493586,0.00007837741,0.9941317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993433,0.000029711575,0.000101115074,0.00016643658,0.00022747205,0.00013200556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996037,0.000036971236,0.000045378245,0.00022904637,0.000017225326,0.000067703746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020039406,0.00008297766,0.000119947814,0.0000449783,0.000078401914,0.00004545457,0.000321954,0.00010858299,0.020102322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024310342,0.00004950994,0.00006776439,0.00023909063,0.00010474955,0.000011845249,0.00006761215,0.000090417845,0.0057563484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.5048e-7,0.00000921979,0.000026172132,0.000009544294,0.0000195624,2.2466776e-7,0.00052623835,4.1950668e-7,0.0000012534729,0.026778584,0.97118145,0.0014466702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014996255,0.00000765068,0.00016639977,0.000037812948,0.00001928668,5.0182376e-8,0.00024691146,8.320679e-7,0.000004842382,0.00025259476,0.9991739,0.000074772186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028612835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043555066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02799239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022787963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008535868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99501777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020997","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.072","title":"31 January 1753. Cleland to Edward Dickinson","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.021075929068574684,"score_gpt":0.3453510796778523,"score_spread":0.3242751506092776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011469221,0.0004042442,0.0002165605,0.008468073,0.00042340148,0.00040259107,0.000049953123,0.00041211105,0.9896116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008012608,0.0001803232,0.00062951737,0.0007754125,0.0015814621,0.00005544928,0.000009168188,0.00011876357,0.99584866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919164,0.000018585857,0.00009182064,0.00027033387,0.00022292057,0.00020469965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958205,0.00001513451,0.000027211012,0.00020938124,0.000012064031,0.00015416484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013050817,0.0001069317,0.00012644376,0.00008975909,0.0000858364,0.000117733136,0.0002654319,0.00018270659,0.0043076156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016272408,0.00008783398,0.00006506428,0.0002333031,0.00005726822,0.000019995672,0.00008565559,0.0001327259,0.018219853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8604978e-7,0.000008690307,0.000015099498,0.0000105904,0.0000110085675,0.0000016070504,0.00055868883,1.00716655e-7,0.0000014985493,0.1218324,0.8758793,0.0016806416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021964857,0.000006396503,0.0000255644,0.000047244128,0.000014311989,1.10741425e-7,0.00030889225,7.396857e-7,0.0000018552196,0.0013633061,0.9980733,0.00013630636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018353866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023450326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122194014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006006781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012223214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399036151","doi":"10.29173/mlj721","title":"Interview with Howard Pawley","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04878121524588696,"score_gpt":0.2940225930122529,"score_spread":0.24524137776636595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399036151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07703302,0.0003836161,0.0045061912,0.01069484,0.0003796861,0.00022241363,0.0000028897039,0.00006971878,0.90670764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718106,0.00011578425,0.0010946676,0.00094583293,0.00031681254,0.0000062725007,3.134529e-7,0.000008140668,0.00033110107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915963,0.00017190518,0.00012271025,0.000086229884,0.00023971232,0.00021978223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956065,0.00002482123,0.000072182855,0.00009956571,0.000089696536,0.00015307736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064834754,0.00006236775,0.00008122786,0.000016537108,0.0011081669,0.00025898952,0.00019875183,0.00003224084,0.0003759312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024354034,0.000045877776,0.000048260168,0.00012266773,0.00013951042,0.00017765201,0.000013541873,0.00020607673,0.00013538863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021900025,0.000040362153,0.00068985455,0.0000031905167,0.00001615249,0.000015545578,0.00078859954,0.0000044362155,0.000010250013,0.9839259,0.0019759422,0.0125275785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014013254,0.000026981827,0.00034707363,0.000020397034,0.000011787203,0.000050362676,0.012354883,8.4936374e-7,0.000051852177,0.008019031,0.97889805,0.00007862329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032841857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13993369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007960424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008082596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87576026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399060908","doi":"10.29173/mlj729","title":"Manitoba Tort Cases since the Turn of the Century","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Turn (biochemistry); History; Political science; Law; Liability; Chemistry","score_opus":0.029159125473657142,"score_gpt":0.28555173314051396,"score_spread":0.25639260766685684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399060908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8604565,0.00073134026,0.0000400677,0.035789028,0.0008505793,0.00034791164,0.000019562303,0.000032089938,0.101732895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966785,0.00020028511,0.00010750788,0.0008712335,0.0019840456,0.000004902346,3.040391e-7,0.0000073458164,0.00014589618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883723,0.00015037415,0.00023460416,0.00008995848,0.00044530706,0.00024251713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924517,0.0001273961,0.00019166464,0.000236905,0.00011672346,0.00008211514],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005241073,0.00007782198,0.00008653544,0.000011872158,0.0022491566,0.00018036498,0.0007125298,0.0000458581,0.00010002214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064639586,0.0000423296,0.00012832062,0.0001527271,0.0003939469,0.0001931112,0.00009500809,0.00030551662,0.00003998627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013375043,0.00016990051,0.006146134,0.0000059144136,0.00004297004,0.0000123588425,0.003913801,0.00011354917,0.00030435357,0.9378407,0.0074581006,0.043978833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000903511,0.000010103949,0.007870396,0.000015825306,0.000022441074,0.00007179877,0.02409267,0.000008753444,0.0002443873,0.0014917881,0.966013,0.00006846299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0330985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58882606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014499786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010146047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399075632","doi":"10.29173/mlj1055","title":"Introduction","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.022966971131650703,"score_gpt":0.28668764374564343,"score_spread":0.26372067261399273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399075632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05616948,0.0035111208,0.0012738794,0.6232361,0.006456449,0.00016751498,0.000006545656,0.000055058197,0.3091238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519233,0.00090437324,0.0009946261,0.002001393,0.037441786,0.000001436446,0.0000017780432,0.000008103638,0.0067231827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882984,0.00013029449,0.000244619,0.00014734597,0.0003021578,0.00034573927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937916,0.000017997265,0.00013643768,0.00013602855,0.0001223139,0.00020806622],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053443643,0.000098825,0.00010907671,0.00002470047,0.0017826165,0.00035143702,0.0002435015,0.000099012235,0.0014650314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022882554,0.000098502554,0.000106149804,0.0002432683,0.00025077592,0.0005079039,0.000016388143,0.00046392635,0.0010510014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031234567,0.000090721354,0.000017231901,0.0000015354303,0.000008343481,0.000007675478,0.00044658285,0.000034954417,0.000064336324,0.75394094,0.04284129,0.20254324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011202049,0.00006938648,0.0008320256,0.0000120108625,0.00002944459,0.00012985834,0.0049954355,0.000027138116,0.000058028523,0.079782985,0.9138436,0.00010807148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008504677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037077844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89575386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026077282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005609867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399195557","doi":"10.1017/9781009253994.011","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399195557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399213721","doi":"10.21638/spbu25.2024.107","title":"The constitutionalisation of private law: Comparative analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pravovedenie","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Private law; Political science; Law; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Public law; International human rights law; Comparative law; Constitutional law; Sociology","score_opus":0.062346755492209735,"score_gpt":0.3937672538034147,"score_spread":0.33142049831120496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399213721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072938114,0.0021919825,0.01745599,0.016185248,0.00031377506,0.00048437607,0.00013371845,0.00015123242,0.89014554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985738,0.000055036486,0.0001668501,0.000034957564,0.00006238645,0.00001705383,0.000011533048,0.0000011379732,0.001077238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994413,0.00006658391,0.00012342326,0.0000901993,0.0001926829,0.00008580377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994607,0.00031224662,0.000039076185,0.000098660195,0.000060805694,0.00002854006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040922203,0.000033835204,0.00006720889,0.000025812678,0.0005246287,0.00013053657,0.00013274734,0.000022417673,0.00007088178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035881123,0.000023698714,0.0000733038,0.00051141344,0.0005271398,0.00011147987,0.000020654847,0.00005434145,0.00004636168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013230332,0.00000725528,0.0002294332,0.0000020200966,0.00011727162,1.7562888e-7,0.0020552054,0.000057640867,0.00011691319,0.99685633,0.00034697726,0.00020943194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023092547,0.0000031885284,0.001196565,0.000004697256,0.000115961324,1.040981e-7,0.00072405254,0.00065829436,0.00039456578,0.043403257,0.9534368,0.000039450275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014221047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042860415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003528936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011512402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40350726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399357646","doi":"10.35948/1590-5586/2024.571","title":"Mutuo o donazione? The presumption of resulting trust (British Columbia, K.G. v D.G., 2023)","year":2024,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Trusts","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02505365084238423,"score_gpt":0.3007133194420429,"score_spread":0.2756596685996586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399357646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79435664,0.00474948,0.00011275987,0.008542653,0.0019773645,0.0014491632,0.00073193584,0.00024374177,0.18783627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91284245,0.0010993188,0.00007822903,0.000080003614,0.0009811929,0.000057988596,0.000021713491,0.000022742146,0.08481634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978565,0.00020334957,0.0005255551,0.00044200636,0.00055994414,0.0004126723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988873,0.00033837324,0.00016247513,0.00037772284,0.00011918639,0.00011495809],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011328162,0.000118911936,0.00021354022,0.000029467144,0.000963932,0.0012618003,0.0005356725,0.00018947522,0.0023502703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001794162,0.000141301,0.00019804336,0.00081515504,0.0004628137,0.0002840592,0.0001563205,0.00038901655,0.00040731282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048684284,0.00062956737,0.010982934,0.0009918109,0.0005136113,0.000083957326,0.05370141,0.0003236013,0.0020460817,0.1860383,0.37933815,0.3653019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002809747,0.000046258952,0.03667547,0.0005335325,0.00015411126,0.000009527981,0.0051157637,0.0039914693,0.00005382515,0.003973889,0.94887215,0.0002930007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14639173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07413574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56953406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118020085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026066342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399484990","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192868084.001.0001","title":"Furmston and Tolhurst on Contract Formation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.039520135694147994,"score_gpt":0.25990463910990963,"score_spread":0.22038450341576163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399484990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030738307,0.000011090932,0.00007125977,0.0001876902,0.000093263705,0.00041687576,0.00012513676,0.00016861162,0.99861866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036669073,0.0003680777,0.000017675142,0.000060831087,0.00015071602,0.0000018895962,0.000044722434,0.0000146652565,0.9956745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992256,0.00004491611,0.00009045164,0.00021024157,0.00023194116,0.00019684891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994022,0.00012247254,0.00012840726,0.00017578914,0.000055436452,0.00011564766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014102516,0.00012516,0.00015121001,0.00007946752,0.0006594571,0.00008018775,0.0002515413,0.00023946165,0.000011098787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001276396,0.00014243471,0.000066529225,0.000015735743,0.00018508182,0.00013051534,0.000107073174,0.00024072676,0.0000058683017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018625855,0.0000063955144,0.0000016646629,0.000022586204,0.000016751364,0.000009628233,0.0017159765,0.0000024222018,0.0000023931918,0.9816803,0.010128093,0.006395218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018598014,0.000022409087,0.000035639583,0.000057659967,0.000034847704,3.4046965e-7,0.00032780325,0.000028675056,0.000008214399,0.0011830551,0.9979595,0.00015589525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046199386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007790973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002696182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016772574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5808319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399617902","doi":"10.1017/9781009516075.007","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399617902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399618958","doi":"10.1007/s10982-024-09499-z","title":"The Personality of Public Authorities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Personality; Political science; Politics; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Public law","score_opus":0.07397664850377451,"score_gpt":0.3367470778601837,"score_spread":0.2627704293564092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399618958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009809804,0.002628607,0.00002235189,0.07289215,0.00012494768,0.000061214334,0.000021517133,0.00003767545,0.9144017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830854,0.00019037447,0.00001819348,0.00016171459,0.00032891257,0.000007321749,8.813585e-7,0.000001933908,0.000982102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996675,0.000040287294,0.000055199213,0.000062981526,0.0000985143,0.00007551278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997481,0.00012451794,0.000009329047,0.000059376158,0.00002156175,0.000037111156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034035998,0.000024680752,0.0000332148,0.000005016888,0.0005594481,0.00013428576,0.0000789467,0.00002136212,0.000026153712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012252894,0.00001620674,0.000027041826,0.000078135934,0.00045095585,0.00008000702,0.000019215064,0.000048873717,0.000006162342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.63022e-7,0.0000036732888,0.000061882434,0.000010283369,0.0000050374324,1.2899999e-7,0.0016288833,1.4824782e-8,0.0000057481016,0.9968552,0.00017830789,0.0012504894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065471877,0.000002695395,0.000060735118,0.0000032807047,0.000001902677,8.344623e-8,0.00019157979,0.0000061041437,0.0000044098606,0.4502352,0.549474,0.000013508572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013484433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006733451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98849875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006500654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036098954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4302879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400063866","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4870697","title":"Civil law trusts? Lessons from Quebec and other jurisdictions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Business; Commercial law","score_opus":0.020582069038202148,"score_gpt":0.3272660178882441,"score_spread":0.30668394885004197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400063866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17698742,0.056430496,0.006680068,0.16846721,0.0033006254,0.0012843952,0.00087414734,0.0007081937,0.5852674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717962,0.0075598694,0.00007965456,0.00033241356,0.0022800355,0.000042483964,0.000010812887,0.000043341755,0.017855177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973323,0.00016196353,0.00030029687,0.0004128995,0.0003498349,0.0014427308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992332,0.000086354325,0.0001689608,0.00026406845,0.000065959226,0.0001814929],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012493324,0.00021102175,0.00024039652,0.000084893065,0.0011077017,0.00066997233,0.00046434166,0.00032627105,0.0002120578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025891115,0.00019519072,0.00019715974,0.00014868149,0.00031447093,0.00009011801,0.00036533648,0.0049465057,0.000118162425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034888078,0.000030884054,0.00006923251,0.0000055476976,0.00019134158,0.0000013905503,0.0036510637,0.000016139473,0.000015504027,0.99005383,0.0005006461,0.005460941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000733289,0.0000085681,0.00005783874,0.000045327717,0.00010280102,0.000007084309,0.002391577,0.000026908958,0.0000029593218,0.61267924,0.3844596,0.00014475593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2622661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88894427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7948088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014797425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006810423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400239463","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4878608","title":"The Continuity of Private and Public Law Reasoning in Chief Justice McLachlin's Criminal Law Judgments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Public law; Criminal justice; Private law; Criminal law; Political science; Criminal procedure","score_opus":0.01816514642784234,"score_gpt":0.3092303468588079,"score_spread":0.29106520043096556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400239463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91377264,0.009754595,0.0011077835,0.010985991,0.00029089293,0.0002962039,0.000005583753,0.0000505981,0.0637357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526054,0.003800817,0.000049189697,0.00009176185,0.00021240805,0.0000067127794,6.633909e-7,0.000007967227,0.0005699552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981424,0.0001375957,0.00022824379,0.00013731066,0.0002710762,0.0010833804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995367,0.00015524344,0.0000814478,0.000093150455,0.000054556433,0.000078906574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030094336,0.00007294728,0.00009949341,0.00003328573,0.0009348777,0.00034110833,0.00027350915,0.000050477487,0.000006618541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010701329,0.00005365776,0.000046949666,0.00021663349,0.00034040603,0.0002872776,0.000055136505,0.0009947772,0.0000043685204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006562994,0.000020463922,0.00035195294,0.0000088339475,0.000023425293,0.0000011437515,0.0010652491,0.0000013662607,0.00007394435,0.99304765,0.000010010556,0.0053893668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039232656,0.00009896571,0.0012923722,0.000095345815,0.00012036624,0.000049934584,0.015544277,0.00024377662,0.00007113232,0.6703775,0.3115395,0.00017450392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027601705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062653415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3226702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003644172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000915652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9544507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400478024","doi":"10.1017/9781108983624.012","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400478024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400598815","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v43i2.8293","title":"The Territorial Scope of Australia’s Unfair Contract Terms Provisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Queensland Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Project commissioning; Publishing; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.025840957248229327,"score_gpt":0.2995478676164416,"score_spread":0.27370691036821226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400598815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5022159,0.0014534523,0.0011546023,0.08817761,0.0037703784,0.00097579014,0.00019084776,0.000099392826,0.401962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964788,0.0003436115,0.000048127782,0.000007975343,0.00048552325,6.4148594e-8,5.501027e-7,0.000002212532,0.0026331344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993831,0.00011754865,0.0001043115,0.00005594525,0.00021303163,0.00012608543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994798,0.00021488465,0.00007987478,0.00010073633,0.00006470272,0.000060059876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064732856,0.000041042626,0.0000744428,0.000014593626,0.0015713876,0.00008188592,0.00038627582,0.00003907342,0.00012532985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017828224,0.000023278528,0.000094562194,0.0000871017,0.0006102474,0.00013132837,0.000036239933,0.00021880421,0.0000113743035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051464456,0.00003005892,0.0002646501,0.00000829975,0.00007195051,0.000011790202,0.0077868993,0.00002489485,0.00026998678,0.9745426,0.013351953,0.0035854408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001662595,0.00003219389,0.0016307229,0.00005844932,0.000043630826,0.0000058706905,0.0027358872,0.000026195929,0.000070000024,0.0052110795,0.98997897,0.000040724997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019001849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020095037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97662705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036046637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013168639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400684085","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4896338","title":"Private Property Interests, and Statutes of Limitation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private property; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02578722948605795,"score_gpt":0.31887681858435524,"score_spread":0.2930895890982973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400684085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94293517,0.016640233,0.002634044,0.019377574,0.000496499,0.0008132834,0.000036415557,0.00010158318,0.016965188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733568,0.02132146,0.00024313654,0.000022632403,0.00031734066,0.000014907855,0.000006815454,0.00001568646,0.0047012465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998343,0.00013400274,0.00027941464,0.00020240195,0.00024526226,0.0007959549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942386,0.0000559045,0.00021100695,0.0001242293,0.00011540636,0.00006959534],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018871288,0.0001142952,0.00016410318,0.00008930978,0.00025578338,0.0001771813,0.00028639616,0.00013091895,0.000010762423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012300871,0.00007941705,0.00008525551,0.0001104364,0.0001586092,0.00007705569,0.00031735795,0.00288458,0.000013172425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074301884,0.00002667499,0.00029906636,0.000058411682,0.00010417727,5.746508e-7,0.0040347776,0.000015422365,0.00010284868,0.97356933,0.00017378989,0.02160747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000782084,0.00005338984,0.0002559141,0.00014169439,0.00005875525,0.000008464005,0.0042144144,0.000077999925,0.000037079237,0.9515814,0.043370835,0.00012180984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010598165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005878769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043197047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000521889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039776107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879696","doi":"10.7202/1112504ar","title":"Speech of Justice McKinnon: Induction Into the Common Law Honour Society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05323877694658328,"score_gpt":0.37113799284031673,"score_spread":0.31789921589373343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400879696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010873736,0.024517814,0.00005826382,0.14040203,0.0006540692,0.0018477995,0.000022611868,0.00032875652,0.8212949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87345755,0.107385546,0.0009688287,0.012947582,0.00097019173,0.0001852088,0.000033038148,0.000029602226,0.004022423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900305,0.00015919724,0.00025787824,0.00014342454,0.00026889445,0.00016753223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928695,0.00012296803,0.00014196984,0.00031060496,0.00008976248,0.000047728685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015429339,0.00007163259,0.00018230485,0.0000055762384,0.0007811159,0.000035644993,0.0003430865,0.000057836518,0.00010827008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003975104,0.000050483108,0.00014166425,0.00073957024,0.00034496005,0.00011977804,0.00007648591,0.00015056,0.0002740895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8496966e-7,0.000014541809,0.00001435215,0.00042619338,0.000008846212,2.6269927e-7,0.0011201218,0.0000010982411,0.00005026553,0.9645508,0.021644006,0.012169307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031310457,0.0000061412675,0.00010142113,0.0002644208,0.000077211065,5.4071165e-7,0.0005158013,0.0000063715584,0.000054859956,0.005459002,0.9934204,0.00006252278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012382505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010202396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97177637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042631564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056418274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99419415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401062233","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3982","title":"Tawdry or Honourable? Additional Payments to Representative Plaintiffs in Ontario and Beyond","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Payment; Actuarial science; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.035326563201308926,"score_gpt":0.3279661807484607,"score_spread":0.29263961754715173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401062233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016365249,0.00014525151,0.00022342609,0.009879251,0.00036977886,0.00030619762,0.0002523448,0.000040364208,0.9724181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97942466,0.00011603252,0.0019767731,0.0006982604,0.0003226575,0.000048204176,0.000028570012,0.000011749654,0.017373085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989033,0.00008357899,0.00021416917,0.00021632707,0.00031706266,0.00026558028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993837,0.00019630359,0.0000422036,0.0000765842,0.00005818763,0.00024300856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033554644,0.00008594705,0.00010760551,0.00006837608,0.00064361416,0.00048052607,0.00015923558,0.00005527066,0.009769838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057802896,0.00007018665,0.000038345737,0.00020839405,0.000115908195,0.00040386582,0.000058904294,0.00040730016,0.00010961584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035211488,0.00006784383,0.000735088,0.0000042892707,0.000037595237,0.00013312724,0.010833208,0.000032832024,0.00006408646,0.9368457,0.047769673,0.0034412984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024772933,0.000046395427,0.005577964,0.00008928061,0.000013074863,0.000058569698,0.0036155914,0.000022910845,0.000026216512,0.122940175,0.86720943,0.00015265628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33758992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035277064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043568588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99113536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401501975","doi":"10.1093/ajj/auae010","title":"Common Good Constitutionalism and the Individual—A Property Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Subordination (linguistics); Mainstream; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Function (biology); Law; Property rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.024929922603209524,"score_gpt":0.34408552478137633,"score_spread":0.3191556021781668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401501975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5270325,0.00906682,0.0014402226,0.40146476,0.0003821309,0.000513512,0.000027971515,0.000051962874,0.060020097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974493,0.00094208634,0.0001560603,0.00075177546,0.00032345604,0.0000062638687,9.190536e-8,0.0000036525146,0.00036735396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989156,0.00031147752,0.00017358821,0.00008370961,0.0003913117,0.00012432912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887145,0.0006353059,0.00018043494,0.0001106156,0.00013833749,0.00006385582],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001762241,0.000059230024,0.00014444916,0.00003070217,0.00058975397,0.00023488034,0.0004961621,0.000011807899,0.00001788823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001396576,0.000023319424,0.00007160922,0.00035273776,0.0044303034,0.00017599484,0.00006799984,0.00031007314,0.0000106961725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002945306,0.0000120314735,0.00019969871,0.0000014485308,0.000053297073,0.0000059858016,0.022440122,0.000009433217,0.000021435135,0.9675288,0.0008331791,0.008865075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000543253,0.00023683754,0.010606344,0.0002053743,0.00030369172,0.00039919524,0.092897676,0.00018521746,0.00006155237,0.1524855,0.7418387,0.00023665074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027261889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001562169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81504333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006369267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040339938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401782410","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198852285.001.0001","title":"The Law of Rescission","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rescission; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04074136914957063,"score_gpt":0.2710036689802885,"score_spread":0.23026229983071786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401782410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000137047955,0.000022309989,0.000020557374,0.0002201669,0.00011938856,0.00026580924,0.00006653672,0.00008338477,0.9991881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00035456277,0.00044588934,0.000023846847,0.00001479624,0.000111679394,8.9246686e-7,0.000008795123,0.000012088698,0.99902743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919707,0.000068900794,0.00010188194,0.00015957317,0.00029426627,0.00017830367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991343,0.00023010612,0.00015321226,0.00031040696,0.00009522433,0.00007676838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025302262,0.000085095315,0.00012188743,0.000027541426,0.0012577405,0.000040405444,0.00070751575,0.00018783721,0.0000057306456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015221252,0.00007304739,0.000110303954,0.000020693422,0.000661803,0.0000394675,0.0002883321,0.00020507039,0.0000020554046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010552846,0.0000028312588,3.0948414e-7,0.000010074916,0.000016899674,0.0000026311332,0.00076604343,0.000001134065,0.000002362652,0.9722923,0.025518874,0.001376002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000680142,0.00000788392,0.0000025081429,0.000040749735,0.000032151063,4.9433726e-8,0.0004680323,0.0000037979612,0.000015311902,0.009158362,0.990122,0.000081098646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001619589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029612521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016310903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037745512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9673651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401783167","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198804918.003.0008","title":"Contractual Expropriation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03263408374053695,"score_gpt":0.2427027195930637,"score_spread":0.21006863585252675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401783167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006564989,0.000017216516,0.00029505676,0.00012585675,0.00015031018,0.0005111969,0.00009309853,0.00010343388,0.99863815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006068861,0.00018787874,0.000089724155,0.00005508473,0.00021881131,5.7748963e-7,0.000026369396,0.000017237644,0.9933354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914014,0.000025181287,0.00010263139,0.0002595024,0.00028165366,0.00019086152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927306,0.00006756947,0.00017274613,0.00026993352,0.00011329461,0.00010341326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011764732,0.00013999912,0.00017373008,0.00005406474,0.00041243434,0.000059633938,0.00038360726,0.00033516317,0.00016038405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008439883,0.00016573703,0.000120222416,0.000004933396,0.00017304881,0.00010712854,0.00011856532,0.00026112568,0.000016981307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014322352,0.0000044556655,0.0000016667065,0.000007267334,0.000026647493,0.000004141544,0.00094943726,0.0000019379704,0.0000065397435,0.9935184,0.0014350177,0.0040301764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019988061,0.000012637615,0.000007416157,0.000023094659,0.000057352205,1.9913773e-7,0.00019814799,0.000008360021,0.000009892883,0.0016012237,0.99768525,0.00019654822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005547368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003378139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019966094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030236953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.675856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401928670","doi":"10.1093/9780191964718.001.0001","title":"Jurisprudence in the Mirror","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Comparative law; Law; Notice; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Philosophy of law; Legal history; Common law; Context (archaeology); Legal realism; Sociology; Public law; Geography","score_opus":0.043831411279698335,"score_gpt":0.3719950547043044,"score_spread":0.328163643424606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401928670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009321918,0.00030013,0.000007035764,0.016727328,0.000104993516,0.00026248998,0.000008471409,0.00004341747,0.9825368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017656536,0.00012462508,0.00010927441,0.0007738141,0.00016398725,0.000050948674,0.0000048038955,0.0000068346576,0.99700004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931455,0.0000335176,0.00010157014,0.00015116602,0.00027038646,0.0001287867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962527,0.00013727554,0.000021618984,0.00017663003,0.000014899469,0.000024332374],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047232464,0.00006349993,0.000071918155,0.000030533625,0.00013817045,0.00013475794,0.0005217914,0.00012010846,0.00055088365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018916848,0.00003917967,0.000057600464,0.00011652224,0.00012535375,0.000034648765,0.000030206136,0.00028835726,0.002115603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.0196682e-7,0.00000384317,0.0000014269717,0.000004913634,0.0000013800047,0.0000027530662,0.0036068528,2.8935212e-8,2.2277064e-7,0.8166861,0.1793425,0.0003498811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080956015,0.000001885773,0.000028629647,0.0000224923,0.0000064327996,1.8091185e-7,0.00062118744,0.0000019100792,1.7246455e-7,0.066020384,0.93323296,0.00005567111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030653928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02800143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75389045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000986824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005522769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402081838","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-61565-8_2","title":"The Disabled Contract: A Précis","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œInternational Library of Bioethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.06174339726033484,"score_gpt":0.32204339838260043,"score_spread":0.2603000011222656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402081838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010665232,0.0023606475,0.000040557956,0.26980746,0.0021418987,0.00039531518,0.00083617656,0.00006394381,0.72424734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.298984,0.0066074547,0.00013723734,0.0015353841,0.0016311024,0.000033471973,0.00009879967,0.000054362048,0.6909182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974663,0.000075897835,0.0006688037,0.0003929092,0.0011032168,0.00029286437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963667,0.0024213393,0.0004595955,0.00047069005,0.00016164912,0.00012005715],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080025,0.00029209256,0.00025648795,0.00005334652,0.000944669,0.0005314577,0.0021525978,0.00048110832,0.0022565732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004728777,0.00018332733,0.00044374872,0.0001359302,0.005219101,0.00041176268,0.00056959194,0.0013026808,0.0010086795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027295404,0.00003551366,0.00005858155,0.000029725094,0.00027989227,0.000004332292,0.0009204889,0.00001244383,0.000012740579,0.98848796,0.005870752,0.0042602513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000651528,0.000015869395,0.000043817174,0.00012727438,0.00006504143,0.0000028892575,0.00021757292,0.0007490739,0.000022559567,0.3779473,0.62061036,0.00013311832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012195715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020130656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6147396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075384996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053291576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402448089","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2024.2392371","title":"The Case for Fiduciary Duties in Public Law or when Public Law Duties are not Enough …","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Public law; Political science; Business; Duty","score_opus":0.16772162785650016,"score_gpt":0.39804062913449695,"score_spread":0.2303190012779968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402448089","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043078235,0.1989879,0.000034657616,0.6140737,0.0008364714,0.0026547427,0.00017567433,0.0002536442,0.18255243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91651356,0.06741234,0.000105779676,0.010888492,0.0011325313,0.0010602091,0.000015844216,0.000026889235,0.00284437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982644,0.00022515906,0.00044072408,0.00030462886,0.00027984436,0.00048527523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847066,0.0008311198,0.00010709011,0.00030640114,0.00016201765,0.0001226892],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020777672,0.00014323121,0.00030968446,0.000036412825,0.0016739271,0.0007899783,0.0004573927,0.0000906006,0.00031316353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010359758,0.00009293715,0.0001587605,0.0006085066,0.0005088658,0.00051962986,0.00011775662,0.00022209866,0.000103389844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003054846,0.000025259562,0.0000049308765,0.00040394167,0.000014179125,0.000041430343,0.0008506021,4.6168545e-8,4.306303e-7,0.94580394,0.024739463,0.02811273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053402036,0.000015992982,0.000007440288,0.00060081994,0.000033917444,0.00001247424,0.0010186038,0.000010575534,0.0000022201716,0.05259189,0.9455239,0.00012873874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014214046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32033154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015671657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005604882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402869651","doi":"10.5040/9781509966936","title":"Administrative Tribunals in the Common Law World","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10570220025414463,"score_gpt":0.3694603934179583,"score_spread":0.26375819316381366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402869651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026241247,0.00019789783,0.000002648467,0.017811537,0.00029672493,0.0006603456,0.00017974441,0.0001337228,0.98069113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05412783,0.0000065109343,0.000028003195,0.0032277692,0.0012641232,0.00020477884,0.00012309912,0.000029634668,0.94098824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978924,0.00026429558,0.00037870472,0.00038221787,0.0006988661,0.00038354422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985451,0.0006732203,0.00015815014,0.00042963808,0.0000846682,0.000109241395],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023749694,0.00020773543,0.00027695394,0.0001420723,0.00062182057,0.0065788217,0.0012935193,0.00028261077,0.00019457653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009903259,0.00015700264,0.00016410458,0.00017801502,0.00044741432,0.000590032,0.00015531428,0.0015264414,0.00019671542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014341022,0.000008870816,0.0000018986527,0.000012406441,0.00000933901,0.000013152722,0.0061718966,1.2278241e-7,5.1535227e-7,0.65533733,0.337803,0.0006400252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050578816,0.000007958197,0.000008634446,0.00013744319,0.000023105955,8.412136e-7,0.0007321495,0.0000014624101,0.0000034966174,0.2053552,0.79353106,0.0001481013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030621095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1591659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45572802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003036258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012750148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085671","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0021","title":"Unjust enrichment in law and equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Equity (law); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Restitution","score_opus":0.021927008087945787,"score_gpt":0.3043307091853372,"score_spread":0.28240370109739144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01729985,0.0014756185,0.00034222062,0.0022220584,0.00010664445,0.00006041812,0.000006514404,0.000015521166,0.97847116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978192,0.0007633129,0.00031641388,0.000050593237,0.000062840874,2.5869637e-8,2.8045028e-7,0.0000013185432,0.0009860538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996132,0.00003595972,0.000053831216,0.00006607743,0.00012990473,0.00010098355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980783,0.000026522566,0.000022311156,0.00003836285,0.000024308993,0.00008068061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003122488,0.000028824252,0.000054297834,0.00000788547,0.0004282897,0.00005631309,0.00012668337,0.00002995602,0.0005133599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000028513643,0.000030582236,0.000029027291,0.000025581745,0.00023885322,0.00045065078,0.00007199093,0.00008231587,0.000004547015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003693321,0.000017080021,0.00008650613,0.0000052587416,0.000006981408,0.000013331838,0.0064648474,0.0000032647877,0.00004110048,0.9903389,0.00033496512,0.00268406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013011596,0.000017460638,0.00076701125,0.000029755727,0.0000121763405,0.0000028718143,0.010303084,0.00004042641,0.000006346464,0.006233491,0.98241025,0.000046990208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24072489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59576374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030740479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057066383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76433116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403154934","doi":"10.59295/sum3(173)2024_09","title":"The ways of creating a trust","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Universitatis Moldaviae Seria Stiinte Sociale","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030177047914825478,"score_gpt":0.29516960528391084,"score_spread":0.26499255736908534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403154934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07842455,0.000992651,0.0020499972,0.06298197,0.00080821535,0.00077780994,0.00016558121,0.00033352047,0.8534657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912119,0.0002754414,0.0004948522,0.0001474689,0.000320047,0.000009727838,0.0000043940836,0.00001352378,0.007522632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898434,0.000097641976,0.00016492892,0.0001915887,0.00027204852,0.00028947316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899524,0.0005769134,0.000071814015,0.00013895305,0.00015908838,0.000057990685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040002837,0.00009391641,0.00013349211,0.00004145928,0.0018891924,0.00012954508,0.0003346921,0.000071985305,0.00012215367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015417932,0.000080825404,0.00012749943,0.0005560607,0.00058196444,0.00020542338,0.00010323603,0.0001792781,0.00004932582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038049989,0.000013119986,0.00017722495,0.00001288291,0.00008844372,0.000007822938,0.026789632,0.000004112444,0.00020238459,0.9475619,0.01935568,0.0057829474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017416729,0.000035165544,0.0013255215,0.000043062642,0.00008621079,5.36164e-7,0.09619806,0.0000797907,0.00007082395,0.022146622,0.87967706,0.00016297716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042010318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028624793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92541534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018724122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006018242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403766022","doi":"10.5040/9781509972173","title":"Wards of Court and the Inherent Jurisdiction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02636887584373398,"score_gpt":0.2846157908997691,"score_spread":0.25824691505603514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403766022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006931823,0.0005100359,0.00004026951,0.008917379,0.00044439582,0.0004352816,0.00006499372,0.00009809678,0.98942024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025792208,0.000101869584,0.000037693604,0.00024283813,0.0010692207,0.00007923956,0.000025991445,0.000023880593,0.97262704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877965,0.0000832759,0.00025494175,0.00022818074,0.0004887514,0.00016522134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991867,0.00018661725,0.00016789847,0.00024081946,0.00014097225,0.000077007884],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014973251,0.00011894693,0.00020862684,0.00006991014,0.00038290786,0.0014244966,0.0003697384,0.00024796426,0.00006167348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013131356,0.00008225203,0.000113282615,0.000041815987,0.0006741141,0.00025511227,0.00018876245,0.0005652151,0.000024035284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034842385,0.0000030849633,0.0000012553064,0.00003306863,0.000025562764,4.1020223e-7,0.005725462,1.9630647e-7,0.0000017190143,0.6919333,0.29729432,0.00497817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013374114,0.0000057411476,0.0000090719595,0.0001071729,0.00006850719,6.4140124e-7,0.0002871061,0.00001879898,0.0000046170467,0.074063115,0.92521966,0.000081846425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014904699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011431447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62792534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012552204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078677974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404169466","doi":"10.1163/15685284-bja10099","title":"Aristotle’s Nature-Bound Theology in Metaphysics Λ","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phronesis","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ancient philosophy; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016870224562729495,"score_gpt":0.34957237073251596,"score_spread":0.33270214616978644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404169466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3986079,0.0050215614,0.0009252359,0.03253483,0.0010490314,0.00038866754,0.000021073478,0.00036784087,0.56108385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978363,0.00012535338,0.00014184034,0.0002268447,0.0002351071,0.000033917255,0.0000023178566,0.0000073572014,0.0013909569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994174,0.000056008055,0.000083799525,0.000161659,0.00011566529,0.00016541449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996811,0.00014326161,0.0000123367445,0.000112105816,0.000015096284,0.000036057998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002719962,0.00004939068,0.000076667864,0.000046613302,0.00014894483,0.00007105039,0.00015362866,0.00008851672,0.00019434179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003555316,0.000044037708,0.000046043937,0.00038719556,0.00013680653,0.0001107063,0.00003072064,0.00018279206,0.00025310292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012833357,0.000022443626,0.000407423,0.0000058218866,0.0000087035605,0.0000031630157,0.002016454,0.0000040901423,0.00012141802,0.9909405,0.0006792726,0.005789389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040508818,0.0000056941217,0.005419604,0.000007610556,0.000015516618,3.4554404e-7,0.00043348884,0.00016528413,0.000105667765,0.26671976,0.7269967,0.000089791254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026386315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004449491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72631747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000772423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011203458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3988839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330247","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.009","title":"In Defense of the State’s Fiduciary Duties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; State (computer science); Law; Business; Political science; Duty; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.024935074936508466,"score_gpt":0.2360339189131587,"score_spread":0.21109884397665024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004999005,0.0001802547,0.0000041318917,0.00024277702,0.00020949841,0.00032555027,0.00030145273,0.000034160643,0.99820226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025142033,0.00015329199,0.000007272677,0.000047239093,0.000069769936,6.9664e-7,0.0000028817688,0.000013659525,0.9745632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992294,0.000035428195,0.00013099589,0.00021796559,0.00022753139,0.00015870995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994066,0.00006236951,0.00010644819,0.00030289998,0.000068003676,0.00005373112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013940672,0.00012402626,0.00016825997,0.00007872319,0.00019601952,0.000027192778,0.0005041485,0.00015734408,0.000010783704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008447309,0.00011525343,0.0001533567,0.00001798604,0.00053130666,0.00005639239,0.00034189154,0.00033466888,0.000016482574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007360592,0.0000041232097,0.0000027949036,0.000034335033,0.000022024346,0.00002118157,0.0012539693,0.0000035506132,0.0000038409166,0.9838079,0.01473941,0.0000994669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007160134,0.0000037377863,0.000013141459,0.00010468547,0.000049959148,5.0442037e-7,0.00031093514,0.000004946443,0.0000482148,0.0018490708,0.99741876,0.00012446122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006468361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007326601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018443698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026641658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97782695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330442","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.010","title":"Fulfilling the State’s Fiduciary Duties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; State (computer science); Business; Law; Political science; Computer science; Duty; Programming language","score_opus":0.03287540301741708,"score_gpt":0.240391373743545,"score_spread":0.20751597072612793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006579976,0.0005152041,0.00007123018,0.0005007525,0.00032292184,0.0003980356,0.0003407392,0.00019871966,0.9975866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00406424,0.0005310108,0.00001726231,0.00009791929,0.00037622833,0.0000015224721,0.000016424672,0.000028344015,0.994867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989165,0.000035071862,0.00012971187,0.00033997252,0.00031688038,0.00026185316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916476,0.00012493106,0.00010294051,0.00038334148,0.00010835288,0.00011566747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022175547,0.00019589344,0.00017733083,0.00007021957,0.000992562,0.00017657585,0.0006873143,0.00019520824,0.000022065326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008037887,0.00017556117,0.0001938049,0.0000136169865,0.0006304024,0.00007522414,0.0003530578,0.0005233681,0.00013105567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059392296,0.0000022011488,2.2686446e-7,0.000021285505,0.00006156263,0.000037201728,0.0012039472,0.0000048955867,0.0000021386275,0.95562106,0.04230466,0.000734853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050809245,0.0000052139753,0.0000015889862,0.00006916296,0.000120395795,0.0000010518794,0.00064391765,0.000021326354,0.000016895801,0.0012079754,0.9976447,0.00021693371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003156674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020379318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9553401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021997583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025966807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7634085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330589","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.012","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404360679","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.18","title":"<i>Freedom Under the Private Law</i> Allan Beever","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Allan variance; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027153196812584712,"score_gpt":0.30937677465607993,"score_spread":0.2822235778434952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404360679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10108431,0.011477298,0.0018631502,0.20498724,0.0031516396,0.0005546956,0.00009570552,0.00008482787,0.6767011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943625,0.000119673794,0.00016044162,0.0028965082,0.00081527245,0.0000034060242,5.548395e-7,0.000012090476,0.0016295948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998873,0.00008585542,0.0002462371,0.00012428845,0.00031806735,0.00035257387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888706,0.00018850916,0.00007934703,0.00018936691,0.000120467324,0.0005352458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076038146,0.000086317705,0.000108737346,0.000040736475,0.000904561,0.0005480094,0.00076452276,0.00006609251,0.0002689897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036234705,0.00006133662,0.000109663306,0.00026332124,0.0007834584,0.00034390864,0.00002031669,0.00034980063,0.00010510294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.897999e-7,0.0000029963423,0.00008785153,0.0000040455593,0.000019132309,0.000057246543,0.0021727015,0.0000746724,0.000051706276,0.98803574,0.009219386,0.00027360412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042429307,0.000014126823,0.00043625952,0.00006683438,0.000023837038,0.00002778831,0.0004542853,0.000019366471,0.000041203522,0.027624493,0.9711639,0.000085459644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11615496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57461464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9619445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020950078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016160883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88973063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404420367","doi":"10.1163/15685284-bja10100","title":"Aristotle on Ownership","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Phronesis","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ancient philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0509518763406202,"score_gpt":0.3642033199475626,"score_spread":0.3132514436069424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404420367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045740746,0.00040017135,0.00048626665,0.044157766,0.00040940032,0.00014697494,0.000010495088,0.00040987137,0.9082383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894026,0.000034089033,0.000082479135,0.00035474278,0.00034528624,0.000020581623,0.0000012942572,0.0000060582324,0.009752871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995721,0.00002301253,0.000046225396,0.000114257484,0.00012968382,0.000114736555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975085,0.0000878675,0.00000655377,0.000091136244,0.000013679826,0.000049904196],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016322684,0.000033248056,0.000034141798,0.000024310611,0.00022255199,0.00008471869,0.00009651672,0.000027574462,0.00047113578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039634047,0.000027118711,0.000033920005,0.00017680353,0.000056100638,0.00005500857,0.00001108632,0.000053907515,0.0019987018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012678629,0.000019981946,0.00007391331,0.000006014404,0.000005364308,0.000001982184,0.0023502107,0.0000035936775,0.00010622569,0.9629259,0.012035866,0.022469688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014067002,0.000005304058,0.00071830687,0.000008107751,0.0000056298027,8.8355996e-8,0.0003944516,0.00005366584,0.00011452296,0.010890856,0.9877483,0.00004670399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011058467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000344094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063789426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060231963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469144","doi":"10.29173/alr2791","title":"Unfinished Business in Unwritten Justice: Unwritten Constitutional Principles After Toronto (City) v. Ontario (Attorney General)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0377460199084243,"score_gpt":0.32757355510274916,"score_spread":0.28982753519432486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004303945,0.072565526,0.00008364594,0.019397542,0.0007170387,0.001201486,0.00002615611,0.00010119425,0.90160346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86864126,0.049049146,0.00093820714,0.009659799,0.0010950629,0.0010718969,0.00014260717,0.00004339638,0.06935864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979988,0.00013722236,0.00054485165,0.00051670737,0.00036955377,0.00043288583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989929,0.00023381566,0.00006965911,0.00037545364,0.00014047432,0.00018766001],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005993599,0.00022293422,0.00037856746,0.000028814231,0.00032848227,0.000232945,0.0004095185,0.00012995432,0.0031365259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001660699,0.00019536776,0.00014379846,0.0005433205,0.0006971787,0.0006239082,0.0001257544,0.00022915415,0.00035855413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003872941,0.000056588327,0.0011689239,0.0006985007,0.000024453726,0.000018246612,0.000610226,0.000005749081,0.0000034410461,0.9943278,0.0024556643,0.0006265442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010447162,0.0000057960756,0.007106774,0.0020269,0.00016121117,0.000005236936,0.000039193877,0.000012928594,0.000001034211,0.0010185711,0.98925114,0.00026677246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6431258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9630416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079056993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001276038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404696533","doi":"10.7202/1114749ar","title":"Debt, Deals, and Dominion: Insights on Canadian Insolvency Law from Debt and Federalism by Thomas G.W. Telfer and Virginia Torrie","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Dominion; Debt; Federalism; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.019887758426220873,"score_gpt":0.2977578292982002,"score_spread":0.27787007087197935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404696533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19319387,0.193096,0.0000047067797,0.054549407,0.00030922293,0.0019197518,0.00042164765,0.00020452436,0.5563009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87951833,0.10849453,0.00013767015,0.010178347,0.00018532497,0.000095471645,0.000072519615,0.000022875358,0.0012949582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988671,0.00013865952,0.00021712325,0.00033744055,0.00016998022,0.000269728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991379,0.00015729999,0.000061833205,0.00019714686,0.000027648437,0.00041817833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031889835,0.00014302657,0.00026768324,0.000021384012,0.0010495738,0.00019246333,0.00013535141,0.000097067656,0.00007286854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043003583,0.000119349155,0.000032163964,0.00020719222,0.0002512338,0.00017155589,0.000050369308,0.000116781426,0.000057312503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.248226e-7,0.000008880819,0.0004926809,0.00008260466,0.000010608206,0.0000062764047,0.00055851287,2.1624079e-8,0.000019034354,0.9659538,0.026681902,0.006184801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013634426,0.000015806141,0.0021487018,0.0003339391,0.000023487228,0.000001107937,0.000057818103,0.0000029089572,0.000008134796,0.005679443,0.9914331,0.00015919516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4679804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7944755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9647512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047178448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008410541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8072579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404743174","doi":"10.1080/24751448.2024.2405413","title":"A-legal Architecture: Ordinances and Subdivided Units in Hong Kong","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology|Architecture + Design","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02603087701875569,"score_gpt":0.29516746262429877,"score_spread":0.2691365856055431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404743174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6095955,0.014733917,0.22152187,0.11401336,0.0006948063,0.0032512282,0.00006498566,0.0046449606,0.031479407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117726,0.0002198367,0.007275112,0.0001450144,0.00016972896,0.00013147706,0.0000036533938,0.000031019368,0.000846897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806416,0.00019470188,0.0002728348,0.0005804351,0.00027101368,0.00061686634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990689,0.00039615348,0.000051817522,0.00032300226,0.00005172051,0.00010840952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079958775,0.000240281,0.00026635107,0.00072310114,0.00045651325,0.00022881351,0.0005615777,0.0003687983,0.000045247554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037460463,0.00020764495,0.000045659457,0.003166306,0.00094733026,0.00014405872,0.00015253847,0.00096294546,0.000043980013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002637117,0.00004168645,0.0013010997,0.000059314378,0.0000384514,0.00014094074,0.005471209,0.0006025375,0.004009158,0.7372923,0.0012504652,0.2497665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045188353,0.00012555876,0.001541273,0.00029074305,0.000049993818,0.00009240486,0.001945437,0.00054610363,0.004204922,0.32356283,0.66646993,0.0007189209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000929196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034548272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6652195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009235109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003466227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8467515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404989094","doi":"10.1017/9781009562942.023","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404989094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404989262","doi":"10.1017/9781108779791.020","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404989262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405015405","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4981926","title":"Looking through Trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.01534307937477636,"score_gpt":0.33052893278312157,"score_spread":0.3151858534083452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405015405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17580657,0.03639211,0.08947083,0.077116236,0.0018326772,0.0004352202,0.000006297687,0.0006109511,0.6183291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814749,0.0060103135,0.000099381905,0.000115146424,0.0011502821,0.000004437446,5.943749e-7,0.000010837201,0.011134126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981977,0.00005070512,0.0001217029,0.00011889594,0.00022800473,0.0012830262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977523,0.000044532168,0.00002803295,0.000070293805,0.000029896411,0.00005199877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012161548,0.00005830066,0.000060290604,0.00003163445,0.0006512341,0.00025380158,0.00022126737,0.000047724534,0.00012828759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031867174,0.000049971448,0.000082030754,0.0002541605,0.00006570124,0.00032503466,0.000018649407,0.0010455477,0.00014372825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010792515,0.000007631348,0.00006542755,0.0000014859291,0.000025403766,0.0000020391465,0.0017870181,0.0000045010775,0.000031458672,0.9725196,0.00032342726,0.02523094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037027112,0.000013701895,0.000013532963,0.000010697032,0.000010300155,0.00002705662,0.0031472917,0.000038994203,0.000012838762,0.47795457,0.51868105,0.000052959236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050184346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038619034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8056683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076259754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027426556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5008832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405268129","doi":"10.1017/9781009475075.010","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02955016493390613,"score_gpt":0.27464732617761173,"score_spread":0.2450971612437056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405268129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001498837,0.0003288211,0.00038812307,0.00024659283,0.0011842246,0.0003639696,0.0005470073,0.0001343855,0.996657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011010542,0.00036794163,0.000018254614,0.00007841117,0.00077794434,0.000002799283,0.000059872502,0.000023521141,0.9876607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987865,0.00010480478,0.00010568912,0.0003974849,0.00028006162,0.00032547276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.000051659,0.00008012715,0.0003296628,0.000098562996,0.00019188208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012942677,0.00017617903,0.00020214348,0.00011038232,0.0005798058,0.00018148392,0.00069255655,0.00037096496,0.00006648773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009122903,0.00020618667,0.00016325671,0.00005768156,0.00034036132,0.0000726664,0.00033167907,0.00052167894,0.0025114426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003631331,0.000005104462,3.8451338e-7,0.000030853676,0.000026850257,0.0000143867455,0.00022093036,0.0000020232176,0.0000036036058,0.4377194,0.561702,0.0002707955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988627,0.000005245998,0.0000045520605,0.00005879592,0.000067896224,5.5706954e-7,0.0005149647,0.000018341969,0.00003045217,0.0000024315216,0.99897075,0.00023614349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011572634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008589258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43771696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000544042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405315495","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-11945-4_356-1","title":"Address to the Opposers of the Repeal of the Corporation and Test Acts by Anna Barbauld","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Repeal; Corporation; Test (biology); Political science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.029792382879048087,"score_gpt":0.2819853102982524,"score_spread":0.25219292741920435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405315495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006948325,0.00015065674,0.0000043887935,0.030215954,0.00015841202,0.0006769541,0.00022602714,0.000013804164,0.96785897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48587653,0.0000724451,0.000007738627,0.00036018903,0.00008591603,0.000009838623,0.0000031948753,0.000008213434,0.5135759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992237,0.000021133135,0.0001865016,0.00016061001,0.0003228359,0.00008521301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919134,0.00015529862,0.00017142898,0.00035356983,0.000086183434,0.000042197644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029645892,0.000088634435,0.00010579197,0.000012630604,0.00028548954,0.000056022003,0.00045963423,0.00010962999,0.000100768106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008684285,0.000039830207,0.00007697131,0.000080603335,0.0003465576,0.00003954093,0.0002038143,0.0001726883,0.0000088208335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013992596,0.000006011222,0.00005786745,0.000011026322,0.000011857736,5.187665e-8,0.0014323185,0.000002452588,0.00028741846,0.95130676,0.04644756,0.00043527744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000237285,0.000013320471,0.00029764484,0.000058597285,0.00003730157,2.2353507e-7,0.00052297063,0.000008157623,0.00025634974,0.010945546,0.98777306,0.00006310867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015469409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068139243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9413255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021417049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014764661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38023296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405532270","doi":"10.1017/9781009437042.008","title":"Dignity in the Courtroom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Administration of justice; Administration (probate law); Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.03996141267769911,"score_gpt":0.2568567600860056,"score_spread":0.21689534740830652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405532270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009656817,0.00010762848,0.000026844778,0.0005500644,0.00011821717,0.0004339044,0.00018585476,0.000080208185,0.9984007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01567081,0.00013827362,0.000008364627,0.00011389361,0.00023266813,0.0000016037897,0.000014401273,0.0000143662255,0.9838056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907815,0.000047926616,0.00010182981,0.00027239957,0.00029417066,0.00020549101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937606,0.00011229661,0.00006448933,0.00031919547,0.00005356459,0.00007440099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027893507,0.00014540578,0.00014877584,0.00007252253,0.00040249297,0.00011526481,0.0007003185,0.00021463778,0.000007874625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000079595375,0.00013253262,0.00013240543,0.00001535179,0.00036114847,0.000055251563,0.00017998987,0.0005441883,0.000071169845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042306456,0.0000053346794,0.0000013807843,0.000013850554,0.000016387574,0.000075967575,0.0008695548,5.319506e-7,0.0000010321172,0.9712513,0.027477697,0.0002827187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007721817,0.000006012885,0.000017532739,0.0000480627,0.00007012944,9.4138966e-7,0.00062490674,0.0000069080247,0.000001983778,0.0005548857,0.99843717,0.00015426373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033165056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047231023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021058258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017672259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54045236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406772881","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000295","title":"In Defence of the Best Interest Standard: A Fiduciary Duty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law and economics; General interest; Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04427447358406672,"score_gpt":0.34110546627080224,"score_spread":0.2968309926867355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406772881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013048,0.0005209265,0.00016169446,0.016351933,0.00076737464,0.00031300783,0.00016426241,0.000036880847,0.08037916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909014,0.000053604497,0.000028719274,0.00011510349,0.00011918093,0.000014739275,0.0000014463023,0.0000030050696,0.0005740446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955904,0.0000505127,0.0000965435,0.00009332189,0.0001021566,0.00009840682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973553,0.00009230081,0.000016472528,0.00011476819,0.000018644716,0.000022260427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027270426,0.000031631258,0.00005272932,0.000020971875,0.000087053086,0.000033999295,0.0002112126,0.000032084004,0.000057730587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105311134,0.000022317432,0.00003952216,0.0002941579,0.0001569484,0.000081062455,0.00005584143,0.00009484981,0.00004568776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031616541,0.000033164597,0.0042859702,0.000017254015,0.0000044226854,0.0000034421096,0.010896057,0.000008745046,0.00041726508,0.9781108,0.0030689493,0.0031507746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008744677,0.000018143714,0.005680703,0.00014741752,0.000010189022,5.7952786e-7,0.0025261822,0.000050949904,0.0011823488,0.048974074,0.94122,0.00010200728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005221066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028637635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046768222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017423666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406773064","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000246","title":"Anscombe's Philosophy of Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04687924707172604,"score_gpt":0.33643425235361507,"score_spread":0.28955500528188904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406773064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012965661,0.00031946017,0.00018261994,0.006783567,0.00026305206,0.00010435233,0.00004750639,0.000096211756,0.97923756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988512,0.000036312947,0.00008149006,0.0001737411,0.00034689202,0.000009464683,0.000008611989,0.0000039437855,0.00048833934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964345,0.000021838456,0.00007198921,0.00008102588,0.00009775906,0.0000839197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979705,0.00005642759,0.000010670056,0.00008206708,0.000017914781,0.00003588072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013744817,0.000028344868,0.000049008024,0.000016206204,0.0001019251,0.00003174863,0.00010732695,0.000031754724,0.00009187717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012894516,0.000025711108,0.000042328145,0.00013096564,0.00016965036,0.000074315474,0.000016201722,0.000046435925,0.00014553295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.1273103e-7,0.0000116852625,0.00003988247,0.000008481793,0.0000040289874,8.7612796e-7,0.00241303,0.0000014244299,0.00016734259,0.99580574,0.00067927246,0.0008678042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022359955,0.0000057159637,0.00011414929,0.000012640198,0.000004864679,8.6059295e-8,0.00006418982,0.00001379408,0.0002366858,0.17655134,0.82293755,0.000036631503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037277376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011117784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98588556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013518683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005045832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5635249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406967564","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i3.1572","title":"Overbreadth Revisited","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03170321817163785,"score_gpt":0.3405854726422747,"score_spread":0.30888225447063683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406967564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000609838,0.0004925895,0.00025280894,0.0062494585,0.00030110855,0.00005873965,0.000025497626,0.00009797853,0.991912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579364,0.00029674335,0.00042410698,0.00033716572,0.00075204927,0.000002516748,0.0000011560826,0.000007821372,0.0023847758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993405,0.00005048131,0.00012267761,0.00009168981,0.00021893249,0.00017572701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968076,0.000045139037,0.000024055307,0.00007220745,0.000045165114,0.0001326993],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046626586,0.00004523207,0.00005778518,0.000024952698,0.003040565,0.00027598298,0.00014871416,0.00003715357,0.0007546305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023995286,0.000036706726,0.000073623276,0.00019636027,0.00007303228,0.00023364546,0.000021055575,0.00021333851,0.00036730288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.590523e-7,0.0000073991528,0.000009180415,0.0000032506632,0.000008880586,0.000016977332,0.00018236609,0.000001947933,0.000030982083,0.9886608,0.0030138013,0.008063665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033475928,0.0000063188318,0.000050566887,0.000033031192,0.000009512682,0.000023891125,0.00014250941,0.000033421216,0.000036639984,0.011809988,0.98776716,0.000053494565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013263588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025848697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092609196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001666447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407073763","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2025.2455999","title":"On the possibility of a normative account of corporate trust","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"University of Oxford; Bentley University","keywords":"Normative; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Accounting; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.09475618315004518,"score_gpt":0.3709227541955655,"score_spread":0.2761665710455203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407073763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9223491,0.000012450419,0.0002429222,0.0030823974,0.00008469118,0.00017228391,0.000015531248,0.00000825387,0.074032396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992728,0.000004937924,0.00003449515,0.00020580487,0.000024710786,0.000012062397,6.765309e-7,9.632782e-7,0.0004435085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995485,0.000070698174,0.00013633963,0.00006351751,0.00011838079,0.000062569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934775,0.00022965595,0.00013481147,0.00017985045,0.00009543799,0.0000124940725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047425978,0.000029509,0.00006820422,0.000017623734,0.00015352175,0.000008994856,0.00019203393,0.000027689986,0.00007404119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016983224,0.000019205014,0.000033609955,0.0002619137,0.0005266595,0.00004465324,0.000033543332,0.00005462747,0.000010407108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009879134,0.000054456046,0.004210562,0.000007656707,0.00000772631,4.599661e-8,0.010931732,0.0000093561175,0.00016923634,0.9825639,0.0013166724,0.00071878935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039254501,0.00008213511,0.29700425,0.00012224556,0.000035775745,7.008777e-8,0.03630651,0.00026585715,0.012086312,0.61210084,0.0414405,0.00016298918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001318052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004248605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37046307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028840017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001263336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1992509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407292996","doi":"10.31124/advance.173917491.11218139/v1","title":"Hidden ownership, asymmetrical information, and multidecadal contractual obligations at Saskatchewan’s first public-private partnership long-term care home","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Term (time); Business; Private information retrieval; Public relations; Finance; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.03499618664248422,"score_gpt":0.3142954325499163,"score_spread":0.2792992459074321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407292996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65888584,0.0016783967,0.006789011,0.09590864,0.0014310904,0.006203925,0.0019585432,0.0015708775,0.22557367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880355,0.000356935,0.0010142098,0.000736665,0.000351098,0.00037297225,0.0010087519,0.000014734072,0.008109129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698603,0.00017663857,0.0007889201,0.0005847112,0.00078137225,0.00068235456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693674,0.0007527985,0.00040361407,0.0006630842,0.00065895193,0.0005848088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006432553,0.00038726875,0.0004660565,0.00042851202,0.0017940275,0.0012667538,0.0009381042,0.0007613116,0.00037867553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083822844,0.00035679576,0.0002174868,0.00075082097,0.00052363036,0.0008680212,0.0015199496,0.0007966597,0.00013342305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004713835,0.00019535943,0.30730286,0.00066045526,0.00030771852,0.00000620912,0.11262988,0.00008418939,0.0000028277668,0.5366662,0.013030261,0.029066898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015775341,0.000039180966,0.28406748,0.00022903463,0.00024362304,0.0000030095298,0.035499852,0.00027544226,0.00009177809,0.004588372,0.67185277,0.0015319403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006334708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08369357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6588225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000918255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001577071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407592698","doi":"10.1007/s10790-025-10033-0","title":"Two Guises of the Good in Anscombe","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.046804618154786884,"score_gpt":0.3941098705881471,"score_spread":0.34730525243336025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407592698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94667995,0.0005511921,0.000192648,0.016016899,0.00048609087,0.00011390988,0.0000012604834,0.0000031155894,0.035954922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873924,0.00013982519,0.00009053595,0.00031180787,0.00019751224,8.1625626e-7,2.3996611e-8,0.000001920311,0.00051828776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912417,0.00027592652,0.0002586159,0.000030888994,0.00021691616,0.0000934575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992901,0.0002552403,0.00019625355,0.0001550586,0.000083822066,0.000019496207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015028515,0.00003523084,0.00009387722,0.000037742273,0.00017169084,0.000013461268,0.0006126252,0.000023425708,0.000017693976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019337542,0.000018465193,0.000071631424,0.00037548502,0.00033572156,0.000068978596,0.00006683913,0.00017034795,0.000001930788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037560272,0.00017537347,0.02674247,0.00001294901,0.000046038364,0.0000011284037,0.04251645,0.0019440476,0.002688953,0.91878617,0.00396872,0.0030801138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020732475,0.000116629264,0.35634938,0.00073728233,0.0002590389,0.00001342205,0.0617027,0.00018996432,0.008599791,0.26326585,0.3064597,0.00023301174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010421403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000444267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6555204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046004836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027577416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15754114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407687506","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2025.510105","title":"Fiduciary-Republican Property","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Property (philosophy); Business; Accounting; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Duty","score_opus":0.051517728122293424,"score_gpt":0.38095882956608185,"score_spread":0.3294411014437884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407687506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015929886,0.0012722255,0.012877739,0.06712151,0.0024265107,0.00049179717,0.0000066896296,0.0010157411,0.9146285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21109249,0.00062963937,0.00526097,0.0019208103,0.001001318,0.0005800644,0.000012855818,0.000030561692,0.7794713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978843,0.0002561889,0.00044861296,0.00053777,0.0003945407,0.00047861773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842155,0.000174216,0.00012040448,0.00057058217,0.00044016595,0.0002730582],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005718552,0.00018613358,0.00027003593,0.0004068157,0.0030873304,0.00011938837,0.0005038808,0.00023150041,0.0004051413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083050015,0.00016522736,0.00019998712,0.0019122794,0.00027739521,0.00035900125,0.00008593268,0.00042495067,0.00007752895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014638486,0.0002168051,0.000075745134,0.000007441185,0.000016902275,0.0000011537975,0.0016683254,0.0000026371345,0.00028962464,0.6582339,0.33157462,0.007898185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104199426,0.000039950686,0.00008109126,0.000017900495,0.000028838334,9.892807e-7,0.00020396136,0.000010617688,0.00006955887,0.018703006,0.98053396,0.0002059107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022740303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010301372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64895934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011638294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013093184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407752663","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5143331","title":"Waiving Conditions Precedent","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.009308570487569561,"score_gpt":0.33352512192614525,"score_spread":0.3242165514385757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407752663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2338043,0.0021929452,0.035626784,0.05173534,0.00067258807,0.0004310955,0.0000070455503,0.00016433837,0.67536557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96692926,0.0018064677,0.0000352422,0.00017113576,0.00020899509,0.000011880155,0.0000012780399,0.000003578186,0.030832188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851984,0.00006724498,0.0001291613,0.00008977448,0.00014605823,0.0010479213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996939,0.000053937572,0.000050988892,0.0000822578,0.00006544971,0.000053488875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001052277,0.000047907615,0.000060482886,0.000059795122,0.001249336,0.00010353125,0.00024146229,0.000040365634,0.00010473628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008529399,0.000045679048,0.00006284746,0.00024619824,0.00007355468,0.00013518281,0.000025637923,0.0006886714,0.00004995907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011481172,0.00002230066,0.00079983217,6.713849e-7,0.000026456117,1.4060774e-7,0.00037154034,0.000010961069,0.0000848338,0.99377203,0.00058526447,0.004324832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013551401,0.000013948965,0.0013394412,0.000013018477,0.000019224282,0.000005622783,0.007093316,0.000016202743,0.000030005882,0.7036511,0.28761843,0.00006419884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005650969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012167226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7331249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008507887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031628904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9609009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407824335","doi":"10.63188/gpa1","title":"Disbursing Charity: What is the Duty of Foundations to the Canadian Nonprofit Sector?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Grant Professionals Association","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Nonprofit sector; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06136183962177603,"score_gpt":0.36979394320184206,"score_spread":0.308432103580066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407824335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31616032,0.00008481401,0.000023554407,0.6805305,0.0017730406,0.00047711932,0.000037962705,0.000008131031,0.00090458116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916372,0.000120619654,0.000025235524,0.0028514988,0.0005390885,0.00001825082,0.000002415086,0.0000065870013,0.0047991388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979017,0.00044948302,0.0003653508,0.00007828296,0.0009558462,0.0002493676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978791,0.00056271825,0.0007194203,0.0001865514,0.0005491497,0.00010305841],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004873953,0.000063313884,0.0001248728,0.000076168544,0.003082394,0.00022530544,0.0006376317,0.00011543868,0.0000806391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083096436,0.00003046761,0.00017358121,0.0009834366,0.000062894884,0.00038287856,0.00007163514,0.00042935315,0.000033050936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004170629,0.00025808386,0.16272986,0.00003945201,0.00046599426,0.0000019349707,0.279275,0.0007192397,0.001826414,0.1917227,0.34642613,0.01649349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023724535,0.000022381324,0.50581795,0.00041923113,0.00011198377,0.0000014087625,0.028651603,0.00024229025,0.0003740618,0.027481688,0.43649876,0.00014141425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024017215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20113777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.677679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064021646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010531308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407934253","doi":"10.21991/cf29484","title":"Ontario’s Ag-Gag Law, Where do Things Stand?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Art","score_opus":0.01628257739348415,"score_gpt":0.28987895374662537,"score_spread":0.2735963763531412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407934253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016527267,0.0019308967,0.07367683,0.031461183,0.0018370004,0.0008626107,0.00018455993,0.00031492006,0.8880793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756197,0.0001526671,0.001439866,0.0032461078,0.0001628908,0.00017164384,0.00004718447,0.000007633909,0.019152332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713725,0.00009239663,0.00059206714,0.00063197996,0.0006386713,0.00090766046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835163,0.00022100794,0.00016758572,0.0004766817,0.00047850792,0.00030456315],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006142486,0.0003178375,0.00034286428,0.00018520963,0.0055823685,0.0004427968,0.00068021886,0.00031801118,0.0013159607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023536083,0.00032528405,0.0002775129,0.0006192647,0.008520135,0.0012760967,0.00025881693,0.000515219,0.000459447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027775326,0.000118514574,0.00888767,0.00001711759,0.00007462908,0.000008940085,0.00058767654,0.0001391278,0.00003907741,0.96562356,0.023639904,0.0008360123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006940306,0.000013490594,0.00022016029,0.00018760237,0.00005223462,0.000011209698,0.0033830034,0.000036699377,0.00004527456,0.12807624,0.8669516,0.00032844237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03893708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14562908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97396696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012766047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00831128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408302358","doi":"10.1002/iir.1559","title":"Insolvency practitioners: Appointment, duties, powers and liability, By Hugh SimsKC, Simon PassfieldKC, StefanRamel, HollyDoyle, JamesHannant, RachelLai, et al. (2nd Ed.), Elgar: Cheltenham. 2024. pp. 408. £165. ISBN: 978‐1‐03531‐189‐7","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Liability; Law and economics; Law; Management; Political science; Economic history; Economics","score_opus":0.01961311691244946,"score_gpt":0.36118878283707323,"score_spread":0.3415756659246238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408302358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019171553,0.26264396,0.0012148644,0.32462958,0.0021195512,0.0031361158,0.00061319396,0.00028834477,0.40343726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062799916,0.86282843,0.0014264032,0.046461277,0.00031148765,0.000775943,0.0004926797,0.00005626904,0.024847586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960643,0.00042283395,0.0010726994,0.0009517407,0.00094588706,0.00054255285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974911,0.00052936625,0.00056055345,0.0006392527,0.00051409483,0.0002655856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018766468,0.00043835148,0.00062343234,0.00013398226,0.00058183,0.0004031884,0.0009695946,0.0002481468,0.0025646896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012225538,0.00042350026,0.00032086505,0.00073387625,0.00043609735,0.0010284365,0.0004143223,0.0007456966,0.00018112523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024617035,0.0006533745,0.0013461482,0.00044545985,0.00020138045,0.0000068204877,0.00043655824,0.0000038339244,0.00013948673,0.17746177,0.80445534,0.014825202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004131622,0.00007021419,0.00020704872,0.0015789266,0.00010612423,0.0000032775024,0.0006463559,0.000058516503,0.000050553168,0.004977017,0.9914751,0.00041371942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024911412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006407693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6001845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037359074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062405184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408328726","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12350","title":"The common law tort of appropriation of personality in Ontario.using legal transplant to solve the problem of the image rights lacuna in UK law.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Appropriation; Law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030595546660662557,"score_gpt":0.2946379649575176,"score_spread":0.26404241829685504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408328726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91436106,0.00012671732,0.00033467973,0.011446043,0.000095112424,0.0009177301,0.0000063835696,0.0000029389025,0.07270932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828345,0.000018564306,0.00019579695,0.00016642197,0.00003267973,0.0000053316303,2.398151e-7,0.000004000129,0.0012935459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981264,0.0004806211,0.0007125647,0.00008322346,0.00041811538,0.00017911408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855274,0.00066291605,0.00035008628,0.00021983423,0.00018693617,0.000027486683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032503372,0.00009428344,0.0002457467,0.000052859436,0.0004952582,0.000038699724,0.0008536189,0.00003708546,0.00005094098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006653112,0.000032505428,0.00012809808,0.00060872425,0.0006806833,0.00012081246,0.00008663238,0.0005183563,6.4470294e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019599092,0.0006945745,0.0041996585,0.000080283135,0.00020219396,0.0000015521846,0.38388595,0.0017998373,0.025810981,0.5778958,0.0018204481,0.0016487804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037879343,0.0009415342,0.043954123,0.004609841,0.0008121193,0.00003803417,0.057799384,0.004790801,0.15455689,0.1303634,0.5974104,0.00093556294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41558486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90013564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59558994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024714088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000501799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5883068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408566539","doi":"10.63188/gpa2023_002","title":"Disbursing Charity: What is the Duty of Foundations to the Canadian Nonprofit Sector?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Grant Professionals Association","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Nonprofit sector; Business; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06136183962177603,"score_gpt":0.36979394320184206,"score_spread":0.308432103580066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408566539","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31616032,0.00008481401,0.000023554407,0.6805305,0.0017730406,0.00047711932,0.000037962705,0.000008131031,0.00090458116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916372,0.000120619654,0.000025235524,0.0028514988,0.0005390885,0.00001825082,0.000002415086,0.0000065870013,0.0047991388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979017,0.00044948302,0.0003653508,0.00007828296,0.0009558462,0.0002493676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978791,0.00056271825,0.0007194203,0.0001865514,0.0005491497,0.00010305841],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004873953,0.000063313884,0.0001248728,0.000076168544,0.003082394,0.00022530544,0.0006376317,0.00011543868,0.0000806391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083096436,0.00003046761,0.00017358121,0.0009834366,0.000062894884,0.00038287856,0.00007163514,0.00042935315,0.000033050936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004170629,0.00025808386,0.16272986,0.00003945201,0.00046599426,0.0000019349707,0.279275,0.0007192397,0.001826414,0.1917227,0.34642613,0.01649349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023724535,0.000022381324,0.50581795,0.00041923113,0.00011198377,0.0000014087625,0.028651603,0.00024229025,0.0003740618,0.027481688,0.43649876,0.00014141425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024017215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20113777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.677679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064021646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010531308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408806831","doi":"10.63485/ab4w7-k0621","title":"OA as an unprecedented public good","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.08426702099443674,"score_gpt":0.40642558340145074,"score_spread":0.322158562407014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408806831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051369544,0.000039239865,0.0023634902,0.014129346,0.0003186711,0.00048858597,0.000013241078,0.00041231498,0.9308656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588731,0.00010150093,0.001332725,0.0009424735,0.0007092948,0.00006106135,0.0000902532,0.00001751512,0.037872095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833965,0.000108334876,0.00023704079,0.00044775888,0.00046399576,0.0004032201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987244,0.000058791597,0.00011618277,0.0005401015,0.00019236564,0.00036818488],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093255506,0.0001450077,0.00015734263,0.000092510425,0.0005233928,0.00052377785,0.00090738735,0.00038252928,0.0027961663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010820569,0.00013873317,0.00010556615,0.0002634955,0.00016963454,0.00018658757,0.00045183237,0.00045483914,0.0007061908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013216215,0.00011401509,0.00063186086,0.0000055264827,0.000015730348,9.920553e-7,0.0016590247,0.000005255903,0.000010738383,0.98967713,0.0013510954,0.006527295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071877264,0.000011220966,0.0011643298,0.000007248411,0.000011976896,3.7421918e-7,0.0026520821,0.000067915564,0.000052172512,0.03813833,0.95758915,0.00023330508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029672977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038768608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017687627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058317825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409058475","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v14n1p70","title":"The Creation of an English Criminal Code: 6 Acts Second Act - Property &amp; Finance Crimes Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Code (set theory); Criminal code; Business; Criminology; Law; Law and economics; Criminal law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10925139996268438,"score_gpt":0.4668097431176286,"score_spread":0.35755834315494417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409058475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21215814,0.000046371217,0.00003952794,0.007426275,0.00022601637,0.00030398936,0.00004794666,0.000025195612,0.77972656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92061037,0.000095516894,0.00018788574,0.00010662796,0.0002457224,0.00007370767,0.000019587966,0.000004900505,0.07865567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832684,0.0002626197,0.0001954825,0.00020600029,0.0007616362,0.0002473936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976985,0.00062350923,0.000056972407,0.00025378476,0.0013162552,0.00005098907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018402982,0.00005858808,0.00007345495,0.00006535208,0.0010287721,0.00030536737,0.00089757045,0.000054710108,0.00029496444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008875411,0.00003815611,0.000043785072,0.0002584394,0.0006879345,0.00037416242,0.00014394226,0.00026418993,0.000030210616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053900956,0.000099610246,0.00028485977,0.000008227392,0.000018707698,4.6377426e-7,0.0023966983,0.000014288399,0.0005338783,0.9865485,0.0035307088,0.0065101907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011208147,0.00001983942,0.0046012937,0.000023786855,0.0000032634355,1.6450278e-7,0.0008171594,0.00015173291,0.0022286645,0.008613843,0.98338294,0.00004525608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055568097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034745105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9798522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016257439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005618271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98286825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410157873","doi":"10.26443/law.v70i1.1719","title":"Risks, Benefits, Opportunities, and Electronic Formalities in the Law of Wills","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.07881980587268692,"score_gpt":0.3379319718446832,"score_spread":0.25911216597199627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410157873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05360711,0.0014894584,0.000016058599,0.0119487075,0.00006142936,0.00015158844,0.00004627032,0.000009935933,0.93266946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995887,0.0029398995,0.000031847932,0.00079222483,0.00004459325,0.00000686086,0.0000010774819,0.0000023305076,0.00029419878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992682,0.00010604047,0.0001897398,0.00005610251,0.0001613182,0.00021861664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996556,0.00010531427,0.000073223826,0.000080058846,0.0000493375,0.00003643187],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095256674,0.000048137925,0.00008754413,0.000028832865,0.0019771596,0.000065962304,0.00021471392,0.000037089398,0.000028820443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001572915,0.000034521505,0.000034202592,0.00011469532,0.00023902518,0.0002016495,0.00003048834,0.0001972719,6.2016073e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029690739,0.000017721739,0.00013573923,0.000003994639,0.000007289023,7.404667e-7,0.0007552009,0.000007659602,0.0000016721897,0.9953035,0.00008279857,0.0036807056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013351742,0.000017214787,0.0006405299,0.00002440416,0.0000103472685,0.0000056133244,0.007918875,0.0000057646453,0.000045138524,0.037393905,0.953765,0.000039737257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019598687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13149424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9579096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053532684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004469242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410362060","doi":"10.1515/opphil-2025-0066","title":"Did Aristotle have a Doctrine of Existential Import?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.050380294477572286,"score_gpt":0.41143757792315333,"score_spread":0.361057283445581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410362060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00843325,0.000060368377,0.00008852671,0.013608391,0.00010695874,0.00040254876,0.00002063909,0.00001757407,0.9772617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98723704,0.000024921395,0.00035324556,0.00029683448,0.00014406991,0.000041638523,0.000007892882,0.000003970636,0.011890416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932003,0.000036763173,0.00019568732,0.00016794544,0.00014973473,0.00012983911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950993,0.00003385098,0.00008718823,0.0002515442,0.000063434505,0.000054060372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026887222,0.000057388406,0.0001385729,0.00003902414,0.00031117565,0.00008372653,0.0006145868,0.00004554065,0.00032633284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004257535,0.000054582768,0.00006372982,0.00023985973,0.00016047517,0.00014258521,0.00028697483,0.00007331538,0.0000362002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013259627,0.00008844913,0.0010507252,0.000007357175,0.000014892862,9.300617e-7,0.00041393406,0.0000014828539,0.00018348782,0.99492055,0.0021553154,0.0011496061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028415414,0.000015729853,0.0011544906,0.000021019292,0.000017232056,1.2239452e-7,0.0001794263,0.000010344086,0.00047342767,0.34484807,0.6529213,0.000074695155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005382265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005781566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97880375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035840894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017773351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.813641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410943982","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttaf033","title":"Settlors in Canadian Trusts: some thoughts on the role","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.011468802186861552,"score_gpt":0.2979660934287192,"score_spread":0.2864972912418577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410943982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39332354,0.00035160084,0.0000023970783,0.0569982,0.0003984407,0.00068023993,0.000036217658,0.00009529597,0.54811406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844644,0.00007818321,0.000027501754,0.0024807835,0.0005275889,0.00011540825,0.0000042681936,0.000010264932,0.012291614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851555,0.00016698113,0.00021284955,0.00027168446,0.00024268925,0.0005902477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912167,0.00025417484,0.00004482945,0.00035798553,0.000034002267,0.00018733929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000623336,0.00013449941,0.00015028057,0.00018732909,0.0008636503,0.0001515774,0.00060133147,0.00012931037,0.00021958673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016964994,0.00010037279,0.00006980885,0.0005946393,0.00020796861,0.00016779652,0.00004132692,0.00027714344,0.00020712198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006049675,0.00003438073,0.0068876417,0.0000031111776,0.000010066608,0.000003104308,0.0038740875,0.000046276593,0.00001073121,0.9794856,0.0036091413,0.00602985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015603665,0.000009236694,0.020888522,0.000032144475,0.000009620837,1.6208166e-7,0.005358682,0.00012052247,0.00019769839,0.05851786,0.9145737,0.00013576623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43227148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8452549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9209677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045303095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000813045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6642587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410972143","doi":"10.31124/advance.173917491.11218139/v2","title":"Hidden ownership, asymmetrical information, and multidecadal contractual obligations at Saskatchewan’s first public-private partnership long-term care home","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Term (time); Business; Private information retrieval; Finance; Computer security","score_opus":0.03499618664248422,"score_gpt":0.3142954325499163,"score_spread":0.2792992459074321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410972143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65888584,0.0016783967,0.006789011,0.09590864,0.0014310904,0.006203925,0.0019585432,0.0015708775,0.22557367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880355,0.000356935,0.0010142098,0.000736665,0.000351098,0.00037297225,0.0010087519,0.000014734072,0.008109129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698603,0.00017663857,0.0007889201,0.0005847112,0.00078137225,0.00068235456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693674,0.0007527985,0.00040361407,0.0006630842,0.00065895193,0.0005848088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006432553,0.00038726875,0.0004660565,0.00042851202,0.0017940275,0.0012667538,0.0009381042,0.0007613116,0.00037867553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083822844,0.00035679576,0.0002174868,0.00075082097,0.00052363036,0.0008680212,0.0015199496,0.0007966597,0.00013342305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004713835,0.00019535943,0.30730286,0.00066045526,0.00030771852,0.00000620912,0.11262988,0.00008418939,0.0000028277668,0.5366662,0.013030261,0.029066898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015775341,0.000039180966,0.28406748,0.00022903463,0.00024362304,0.0000030095298,0.035499852,0.00027544226,0.00009177809,0.004588372,0.67185277,0.0015319403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006334708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08369357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6588225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000918255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001577071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411089038","doi":"10.29173/wclawr117","title":"Wrongfully Convicted Women","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.017042004162968805,"score_gpt":0.3436933482779303,"score_spread":0.3266513441149615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411089038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033028694,0.021436837,0.00061632413,0.092294514,0.0005576742,0.0017161529,0.000013704604,0.00033681327,0.8797251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8848058,0.041600287,0.000061546976,0.03650224,0.00031853892,0.0008587343,0.000016198444,0.000018487766,0.035818145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985348,0.00034200758,0.00033086937,0.00022150371,0.00023698036,0.00033386296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989578,0.00015749667,0.00011810668,0.00047739307,0.00019463398,0.00009455931],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001333166,0.00011965992,0.00023387442,0.000022994582,0.0012064157,0.00009549959,0.00049051887,0.00006470824,0.001768489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013530403,0.000086857915,0.00008774478,0.00076037773,0.00043006625,0.00016085553,0.00007819943,0.00019469461,0.0006346237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029197429,0.000021384129,0.000030366662,0.00013327652,0.000025334555,2.2459015e-7,0.00048542084,0.0000012270873,0.000016241383,0.9833263,0.009472261,0.0064850035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011740137,0.000008081663,0.00027967774,0.00031404744,0.00004931446,6.159456e-7,0.00033891207,0.000009212594,0.00001268444,0.0044056587,0.99436873,0.0000956359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018200368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008876329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9848965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023139911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002255426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656062","doi":"10.51847/dktkwbwpkk","title":"10.51847/DkTKwBwpkk","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Liability; Damages; Law; Legal liability; Business; Strict liability; Breach of contract; Political science","score_opus":0.012294896984611047,"score_gpt":0.24415633813601803,"score_spread":0.23186144115140697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001187017,0.0000130704,9.4493805e-7,0.003637733,0.0000012104681,0.00013611565,0.0000070238416,0.00009927857,0.99491763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044024116,7.05448e-7,0.00010289868,0.0001251464,0.00018712155,0.00002176106,0.0000028154222,0.0000058787437,0.9951513],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994665,0.000026493175,0.0000730912,0.00011454319,0.00013998292,0.00017939517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996689,0.000027993676,0.000010938204,0.00013804458,0.000024364192,0.00012976334],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001462045,0.00004392515,0.000054652777,0.00001642312,0.00028831072,0.000053156473,0.00019742426,0.000032305274,0.99249274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021229049,0.000043627726,0.000029226487,0.00019523216,0.0000474214,0.00006780013,0.000017812006,0.000041478397,0.986152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005049861,0.00002654917,3.7065558e-7,5.582315e-7,0.0000028759284,4.5890422e-7,0.00024772994,0.00001951666,0.000018545505,0.0009867271,0.03458019,0.96411145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038013615,0.0000111865465,0.000047334997,0.0000018875088,0.00000324239,1.549666e-7,0.0000072237262,0.000015228492,0.000004454523,0.00003274402,0.9997724,0.000066079505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062274444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000773875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96519226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030105422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044115874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22174822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412270603","doi":"","title":"Taxation of Trusts in Denmark (Outline)","year":2016,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.06644892700253126,"score_gpt":0.3192923175441565,"score_spread":0.25284339054162525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412270603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6918906,0.0019280694,0.0010485528,0.006193577,0.00006950806,0.0013363477,0.00034654498,0.000015011805,0.29717183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6050143,0.0011688488,0.00015785865,0.00000614325,0.000022095252,1.2150979e-7,0.000008143269,0.00000924422,0.39361322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954271,0.0016417823,0.00035039306,0.00053079956,0.0013662825,0.000683681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584556,0.0013142626,0.00081280665,0.00081311335,0.0009337947,0.0002804639],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036453092,0.00020332648,0.00056311063,0.00031922528,0.0013847846,0.000021802201,0.0023628208,0.0002744119,0.3457202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003959495,0.0001928304,0.00028926195,0.0019542046,0.0030666138,0.0007405704,0.001274423,0.0003549614,0.040754866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014681044,0.0005915732,0.00024352285,0.00023572733,0.00024493152,0.00006879807,0.031067874,0.00007219035,0.024724891,0.0098633645,0.9167837,0.014635313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002219585,0.0002525656,0.044927016,0.00034891258,0.00010095661,0.0000010905476,0.03810929,0.00014087213,0.0029718447,0.00007575623,0.91058725,0.00026483808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018532634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026117887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30496535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007772705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011239285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412759980","doi":"10.31338/2544-3135.si.2025-106.7","title":"Articulating Contractual Good Faith: The Evolving Civil and Common Law Dimension","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Iuridica","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dimension (graph theory); Law; Faith; Good faith; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Sociology; Commercial law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013861835738713895,"score_gpt":0.3093294926276907,"score_spread":0.2954676568889768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412759980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24111119,0.0011737116,0.00017116178,0.029286947,0.0001591388,0.00052629074,0.000006700687,0.00009962138,0.7274652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834675,0.000059298138,0.00005836185,0.0009228997,0.00009835034,0.00003094102,0.000001000368,0.0000038237094,0.0004785992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923325,0.00009959431,0.00014071711,0.00015163547,0.00017222072,0.00020259162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991831,0.00052576844,0.00004843403,0.00014772818,0.000044433447,0.000050545877],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046235777,0.00006604747,0.000105594634,0.000013120458,0.0018270769,0.00011620957,0.000115853494,0.00003983214,0.000029790017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013051323,0.00004665249,0.000031172967,0.0001792742,0.00032397814,0.00008818884,0.00013454857,0.00013637969,0.000012120572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019940278,0.000032182852,0.0029046568,0.0000035572853,0.00002073902,7.7599697e-7,0.004362126,0.000006028322,0.00023661787,0.989442,0.0015838281,0.0014055138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050322985,0.000026318714,0.07678069,0.000077153374,0.00008999496,5.977978e-7,0.009925189,0.0004928995,0.0002386843,0.020602664,0.891064,0.00019860138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003418837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014744496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9688393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003449047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008929551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412853825","doi":"10.1002/iir.70009","title":"A comparative study on the compensation of bankruptcy trustees in insolvent estates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Business; Compensation (psychology); Accounting; Financial system; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.1047342925634219,"score_gpt":0.45149467376249275,"score_spread":0.3467603811990708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412853825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4682632,0.009529257,0.0001767863,0.056952585,0.00053397036,0.0040121656,0.000038433853,0.000045483604,0.46044812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937281,0.0047114138,0.000030494177,0.0007882441,0.000025831887,0.0002069002,0.0000063634584,0.0000022553488,0.0005003996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988073,0.00024165818,0.0004047786,0.00014797386,0.00030737437,0.000090877074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991188,0.0003748122,0.00015573477,0.00016502195,0.00016810973,0.000017499375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008018731,0.00007497583,0.00020411733,0.00007460105,0.000119878394,0.00002699708,0.00045188097,0.00002000007,0.0002455852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022558961,0.000053361895,0.00006738452,0.0003254399,0.00010167519,0.00009048512,0.000051957977,0.0001212718,0.000036339603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011351267,0.0009642667,0.013931447,0.000077418015,0.00006327564,9.579342e-7,0.009450091,0.000050588835,0.000027145059,0.969491,0.0019157713,0.0040167035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064456684,0.00014443071,0.18544815,0.0049945544,0.000066694025,3.0810293e-7,0.013672354,0.00030497374,0.00014556706,0.017091168,0.77725565,0.00023155972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010688454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015593133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111633664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011760349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26889855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413089984","doi":"10.1017/9781009636124.011","title":"On Making Appointments Fair","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.0322842402686457,"score_gpt":0.26385666982519607,"score_spread":0.23157242955655036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413089984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019080253,0.000023605595,0.0003747346,0.0001463363,0.00017884678,0.00047318992,0.0002107857,0.00015227754,0.99842113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00490425,0.00007101835,0.00006268339,0.00021931547,0.00012593612,0.00000135743,0.000020213016,0.000015064412,0.99458015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989445,0.000036711237,0.0001129105,0.00037923426,0.00028881713,0.00023781287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992084,0.00009495053,0.00013370274,0.00036897187,0.00009116028,0.00010284663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010364788,0.00019472254,0.00020283075,0.000118490214,0.00072355784,0.00006552495,0.0005553884,0.00027478085,0.000015099738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014357719,0.00023840052,0.00016469436,0.000010998365,0.00024318488,0.00005115958,0.0002650383,0.00033653952,0.00005363791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001612693,0.000007639336,4.0650824e-7,0.0000143335565,0.000045598317,0.000025266478,0.0001183553,0.00000122066,0.0000011739228,0.9280311,0.069434375,0.0023044192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001675618,0.000013647849,0.0000035827338,0.00015229042,0.00007676466,2.037059e-7,0.00009422509,0.000007625359,0.000009896771,0.00027927101,0.99897784,0.00021709938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051965937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032231193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92954344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039890571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002488918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9721691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413097262","doi":"10.1002/iir.70002","title":"The return of crown preference: Perspectives from India and the <scp>United Kingdom</scp>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debt; Preference; Crown (dentistry); Legislature; Kingdom; Position (finance); Supreme court; Limiting; Insolvency; Parliament; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance; Politics; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.05058705502240219,"score_gpt":0.36108201978325816,"score_spread":0.310494964760856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413097262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12496441,0.29569915,0.0003075873,0.078182556,0.00086276006,0.002001641,0.00015558957,0.00007582187,0.4977505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8508539,0.14479601,0.00007624061,0.0009040461,0.000120549375,0.00010744487,0.000011752347,0.000003531848,0.003126525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902415,0.0001902599,0.0002700227,0.00014899536,0.0002650104,0.00010156803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980905,0.0012278764,0.00018171094,0.0001909345,0.00028266985,0.000026307242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078064844,0.000069428985,0.00014051341,0.00003564444,0.00041807626,0.00009851277,0.00063578057,0.000037239795,0.000060199898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017067764,0.00003878991,0.00008309012,0.00034572955,0.00058958237,0.00009413281,0.00011982899,0.00015986683,0.000007815263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025977556,0.00002170536,0.0011686127,0.000026443158,0.0000630319,1.219184e-7,0.0032920996,2.1145529e-7,0.000012976181,0.98797566,0.0038312424,0.003605275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001706899,0.0000034606967,0.010307412,0.0006200622,0.00003832754,1.6589291e-7,0.0014717175,0.000027723301,0.000013950109,0.0318051,0.95552206,0.000019306317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027040972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040419723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95617056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045790784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012356622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40878043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142638","doi":"10.1093/9780198961208.003.0006","title":"The Underlying Conceptions of Fiduciary Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Duty","score_opus":0.08038781224331408,"score_gpt":0.36637237615113316,"score_spread":0.28598456390781907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010656286,0.00026919262,0.00026148953,0.0050614714,0.00010728644,0.00020830157,0.000026216127,0.00003576,0.9940292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021940354,0.00058456475,0.00012298062,0.00030649581,0.00009330683,0.000011208586,0.0000061710803,0.0000052448568,0.97692966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942803,0.000014389163,0.00016769869,0.00011377384,0.00017114924,0.00010496344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925214,0.00031781374,0.00008750863,0.00022246932,0.00008838061,0.000031697502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019995324,0.000067123976,0.000098466255,0.000014549469,0.0010453355,0.00004674191,0.00028568346,0.00012206557,0.0006199863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017458084,0.000048601167,0.00009735826,0.00002702887,0.0006139446,0.00003323788,0.000062727275,0.00014220465,0.000055978864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.4203615e-7,0.0000022431998,5.556747e-7,0.0000029112493,0.000014350157,6.7367544e-8,0.00026870493,5.7229994e-7,0.000001951816,0.98838955,0.007927406,0.0033913285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015353457,0.0000020409782,0.000003060514,0.000020018619,0.000014062006,2.382494e-8,0.0003749695,0.0000017385447,0.0000017960996,0.2307951,0.768729,0.000042870695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030117873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018293606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76080155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045186527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026259306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243876","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.035","title":"Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: “Some Basis in Fact” and the Certification of Common Issues","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Certification; Law; Proposition; Basis (linear algebra); Jurisprudence; Class (philosophy); Supreme court; Test (biology); Common law; Legislation; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0829923196441618,"score_gpt":0.3618721441761079,"score_spread":0.2788798245319461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243876","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07377929,0.18113524,0.00006127008,0.6335023,0.00056084857,0.0070339604,0.00047581329,0.00006368134,0.10338758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373403,0.058722477,0.0000466351,0.0022534959,0.000054821314,0.000258898,0.000028943088,0.0000075533076,0.0012868657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989129,0.00037707368,0.00024697877,0.00013323996,0.00018169943,0.0001481477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994096,0.00009592684,0.00013512022,0.00020492167,0.000036612506,0.00011778027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094786054,0.00005510225,0.00019518135,0.00006156123,0.00046338185,0.000029029992,0.00018643372,0.000019639845,0.0007392516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006158694,0.000048588885,0.000047732403,0.00039439712,0.00013498707,0.000119910736,0.000026468526,0.000141738,0.00001538853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010688648,0.00005996279,0.0018841989,0.000476652,0.000029609488,6.763784e-7,0.0020128733,0.000035842597,0.000051939307,0.83870935,0.012891408,0.14383678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001626432,0.000005147976,0.0023451915,0.000084555104,0.000023978644,4.602162e-7,0.0012801874,0.00006124491,0.000008123281,0.0005035085,0.9954665,0.000058494374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42389965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6790755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98257506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035640187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023539297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80942863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243903","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.003","title":"Fair Compensation or Unjustified Temptation to Compromise?: An Empirical Review of Requests for Honorarium Awards in Canadian Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Compromise; Compensation (psychology); Payment; Temptation; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law; Action (physics); Empirical research; Conflict of interest; Political science; Public relations; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21982134167779294,"score_gpt":0.46766112993700404,"score_spread":0.2478397882592111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031408377,0.030902835,0.0013686243,0.83091426,0.0034562326,0.032466345,0.0044522136,0.00032101342,0.06471011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91092455,0.03647862,0.001055179,0.043481573,0.00035987742,0.004231008,0.0013299865,0.00005996523,0.0020792563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782306,0.00041892615,0.0005998749,0.00037197443,0.00031453127,0.00047160903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798733,0.00010893133,0.00023494521,0.0003588936,0.00028874524,0.0010211546],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016253389,0.00014390949,0.00039767026,0.00032810116,0.0009972154,0.00004716756,0.0003506005,0.00007474008,0.00096481235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004999729,0.00015488063,0.000109489134,0.001485961,0.000062736406,0.00027212547,0.000019505738,0.00025306724,0.000027070575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098979144,0.0004447426,0.005393536,0.023947684,0.00011203601,0.000023178321,0.004784293,0.001545964,0.00046387682,0.22679195,0.60102963,0.13536415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012860383,0.00005751327,0.0034029372,0.001265343,0.00005239304,0.0000027907545,0.0005894501,0.00031830827,0.0000038670387,0.000067157904,0.99392784,0.00018381837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8617632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8795162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038696334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063297655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243930","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i2.101","title":"Unchartered Grounds: Covid-19 and Class Actions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Damages; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Political science; Charter; Government (linguistics); Law; Certification; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.17310998654147897,"score_gpt":0.40800666870288205,"score_spread":0.23489668216140308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243930","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005549263,0.03003848,0.0004145115,0.72361887,0.0013584993,0.002685736,0.0006266718,0.00028703597,0.23542096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8605615,0.060364433,0.00007810397,0.06427249,0.0003988091,0.0010907293,0.00011990023,0.000027689297,0.013086321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989136,0.00022809453,0.00016977543,0.00022569908,0.00020077438,0.00026209353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874365,0.000070974245,0.00008762798,0.00020244445,0.000036136767,0.0008591848],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005328353,0.00007851668,0.00013784856,0.00008670894,0.002778607,0.00007792615,0.00017643123,0.000033677297,0.0037080855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015324958,0.000088960325,0.000060879178,0.0005155961,0.000107229615,0.00015268906,0.000030433774,0.00021720248,0.00007060844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001959522,0.000028738034,0.0004625782,0.0003754272,0.00002889426,0.000008825846,0.0010962861,0.000022850196,0.000057279507,0.621515,0.34428722,0.032114945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006425309,0.0000073997094,0.00028610256,0.000020787948,0.000027665923,0.0000104087285,0.0013951075,0.000016471737,2.812284e-7,0.00037173755,0.9976954,0.00010442381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21568486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6553462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85501224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016591216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016584081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244033","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v17i1.053","title":"The Short End of the Stick: Bolstering Legal Protections for Short Sellers in Ontario’s Secondary Market","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Issuer; Redress; Secondary market; Business; Position (finance); Enforcement; Statute; Investment banking; Security market; Law; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.059395177767649965,"score_gpt":0.32493786469464064,"score_spread":0.2655426869269907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058451325,0.017378574,0.00040588767,0.16431855,0.0028309645,0.010547347,0.0003180469,0.00006441217,0.74568486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97104913,0.007314328,0.00011067801,0.0014191828,0.00013220428,0.0008314364,0.000011439037,0.000015661375,0.019115938],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991428,0.00011894092,0.00023691269,0.00014960732,0.000127716,0.00022400125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939543,0.000098325705,0.000043929787,0.0002411624,0.00009478517,0.00012636693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061022514,0.00006522993,0.0001278982,0.000023215112,0.00080662785,0.00006682015,0.00019436673,0.000044840464,0.00054480595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017047126,0.00004897771,0.000111533845,0.00030683342,0.00011117497,0.000101224476,0.000020242464,0.00025488378,0.0000022888346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021388534,0.00012374406,0.014832394,0.0020443993,0.00024872887,0.0000146966495,0.0031375103,0.00014614189,0.0012743132,0.24002866,0.14576295,0.5923651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025020641,0.000002761466,0.0127561325,0.00021817922,0.000022047268,0.000003024825,0.00046447612,0.000021036298,0.000041700365,0.000070138165,0.98631775,0.00005773047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5464931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91259784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082696945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043339715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7688279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244059","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.187","title":"Determining a Fair Price for Carriage?: Applying a “Fee-Driven” Factor and Reverse Auctions to Adjudicating Carriage Motions in Ontario","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Adjudication; Discretion; Common value auction; Commission; Test (biology); Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Carriage; Reverse auction; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Business; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10897969187089407,"score_gpt":0.3628210406555465,"score_spread":0.2538413487846524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6356285,0.017622342,0.021366486,0.18251258,0.0036468469,0.028214034,0.0016928059,0.00060056604,0.10871578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819222,0.003644862,0.0052195955,0.0036124662,0.00023776216,0.0023915872,0.00005230235,0.000030716117,0.0028884753],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875754,0.00010174917,0.00029661515,0.0003481627,0.00012526623,0.00037064287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887246,0.000102348924,0.00010519863,0.00022292077,0.00013735592,0.0005597282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002904014,0.0001123799,0.00023527666,0.000115979805,0.0008870439,0.00010029171,0.00012398696,0.00007431092,0.00028026028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059176935,0.0001329749,0.000082926614,0.00057324296,0.0000428528,0.00020175996,0.00002785587,0.00021503081,0.000018986731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012152788,0.00031426025,0.08844036,0.005583261,0.00036656184,0.0001587352,0.07351244,0.0011660169,0.010463,0.21908717,0.042748194,0.55814785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010185971,0.000006335076,0.010440429,0.0006246451,0.000036316764,0.0000054506286,0.0015555215,0.00007140105,0.000008427965,0.000038686365,0.98695433,0.00015659268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57199985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9442061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001551429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021209877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6822514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244088","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.005","title":"The Collective Class Action: An Expansion of the Class Action Framework","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Collective action; Class (philosophy); Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Indigenous; Political science; Corporate governance; Constructive; Discretion; Diversity (politics); Action (physics); Public relations; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science; Geography; Management","score_opus":0.07336874934503602,"score_gpt":0.37243002289313965,"score_spread":0.29906127354810363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3000292,0.020895703,0.0006581342,0.3311839,0.014089723,0.01352899,0.00023938116,0.00035731547,0.31901768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95445216,0.030256758,0.000050985058,0.0035693082,0.00054501864,0.000213071,0.000010976497,0.000026637928,0.0108750835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807376,0.0005013412,0.000336535,0.00030684398,0.00041580558,0.00036574624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981276,0.00027021763,0.0003410039,0.0006759685,0.0002682011,0.0003170245],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077465875,0.00014600319,0.00023902886,0.000054945976,0.0018285307,0.00012333291,0.0004901775,0.00019948857,0.00056216907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029950525,0.00010107922,0.00018087288,0.0010708149,0.00021782164,0.00035275889,0.000028864613,0.0004862654,0.00017711328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047577403,0.000121146426,0.0034722278,0.00095931796,0.00017574993,0.0000015558563,0.0034838358,0.00018254644,0.0024110917,0.58695936,0.123638324,0.27854723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065648725,0.000021699912,0.0048048636,0.0003913685,0.00004651105,0.0000019574281,0.0020294979,0.000078229576,0.00013129234,0.0009545195,0.99134487,0.00012952072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045243826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48663968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86770654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014633328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021227503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244119","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v16i2.051","title":"An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-Term Care Facilities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Long-term care; Government (linguistics); Plaintiff; Legislature; Pandemic; Political science; Duty of care; Causation; Public administration; Business; Public relations; Economic growth; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Nursing; Economics","score_opus":0.2214919206352509,"score_gpt":0.42846463517584543,"score_spread":0.20697271454059454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244119","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38318306,0.41057578,0.00014474413,0.07090194,0.0007613223,0.002977387,0.0009487172,0.00013140887,0.13037565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307245,0.16150655,0.000043684307,0.0035476016,0.00005408096,0.00011103095,0.00013240257,0.000009578773,0.003870575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904096,0.00017120602,0.00023070491,0.0002201778,0.00013465075,0.00020229061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895597,0.000046836343,0.00007604041,0.00024761245,0.000114181166,0.0005593648],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020908474,0.000082245664,0.00021794502,0.00006858576,0.0003306376,0.000052660886,0.0001146664,0.00007218056,0.0017910055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012506143,0.00009091076,0.00006127543,0.00032340296,0.00011921498,0.00021645114,0.000012637446,0.00016385385,0.000012089108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064993274,0.0001527356,0.2658749,0.014556138,0.00008579597,0.00008684726,0.03371802,0.00007909906,0.00026025943,0.5353239,0.008716744,0.14113906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065427805,0.000005517959,0.049737982,0.0003137299,0.000022990684,0.0000038529265,0.0031944558,0.0000013962325,0.0000055602763,0.000064697924,0.9464926,0.00009176144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9138232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9377759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018811538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005451026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465233","doi":"10.29173/mlj1368","title":"Preface","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.021361202753407717,"score_gpt":0.32803747523212057,"score_spread":0.3066762724787129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05687099,0.0001312891,0.0013217041,0.012142548,0.00042572245,0.00009412998,0.0000014521688,0.00004229702,0.92896986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612737,0.00005531283,0.0003710608,0.00077747327,0.00039993535,0.0000039997963,2.4241666e-7,0.0000024695967,0.0022621576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949294,0.00005053831,0.000101289064,0.00006164062,0.0001403302,0.00015327065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997266,0.00003146933,0.00003514248,0.000077662895,0.00006251866,0.0000666414],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003177059,0.00003556912,0.000047693193,0.000020414156,0.0015573158,0.00022224711,0.00022504192,0.00003312694,0.00014915054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027321477,0.000031731,0.00004083684,0.00012829324,0.000099626945,0.0001206084,0.000031923253,0.00016060489,0.0000930789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014725105,0.000018092805,0.00056585425,0.0000012387152,0.000007348115,0.0000018141625,0.0003241446,0.000006044825,0.000033347664,0.9799624,0.005558403,0.013519817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007700767,0.00000349587,0.0012383979,0.000008829474,0.0000068052836,0.0000019490487,0.007163696,0.000005182231,0.000065528024,0.038861737,0.9525311,0.00003629934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01487181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17734945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94697267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000874393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085510066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465260","doi":"10.29173/mlj1379","title":"Preface and Issue Overview","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.031145639095207532,"score_gpt":0.3455390475111375,"score_spread":0.31439340841593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08956518,0.0039077,0.00045243147,0.03312088,0.0005190174,0.00022331055,0.000003983347,0.000052836676,0.87215465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370694,0.0014474035,0.00038892415,0.0015136647,0.0004898933,0.000004788048,2.8621898e-7,0.0000034525508,0.0024446272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995213,0.00005478875,0.000100860656,0.00007191196,0.00011798318,0.00013313607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974406,0.00003409798,0.00003584828,0.00006675188,0.00004574523,0.000073518764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031623774,0.000040994557,0.00006220225,0.000017059521,0.0012141477,0.00024224508,0.00014312119,0.000033262302,0.00016116662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022217486,0.00003594523,0.000026091891,0.00010340063,0.000107664346,0.00013084154,0.000045888333,0.00013718357,0.000044217686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014382779,0.000015622838,0.00076162716,0.000007151854,0.00000930236,0.0000018795587,0.0004790659,0.0000015150806,0.000021066318,0.9578484,0.0053792377,0.03547368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000831358,0.0000046566292,0.0023083242,0.000022737642,0.000010357031,0.0000034798973,0.004992195,0.000005176752,0.000026616623,0.025191812,0.9673117,0.000039851868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014081032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11512869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9619324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004808332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050308754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803125","doi":"10.29173/mlj1475","title":"Property, Civil Forfeiture and the Charter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Scope (computer science); Civil law (Civil law); Civil procedure; Common law; Legislation; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Computer science","score_opus":0.014908231254335335,"score_gpt":0.2769943145947178,"score_spread":0.26208608334038247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018001385,0.0005032166,0.00044607522,0.123775415,0.00036170328,0.00031564175,0.000001887354,0.000028838442,0.85656583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390006,0.00016383751,0.000051109062,0.0027175185,0.0004941955,0.000012670532,1.9920553e-7,0.0000027181877,0.002657696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947584,0.00008466671,0.00009933374,0.000067176006,0.00013287639,0.00014009344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997301,0.0000478238,0.00003739905,0.000082565915,0.00005407226,0.00004805334],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054735265,0.00004453635,0.00006582508,0.0000131861725,0.0020235768,0.00036725894,0.00020153105,0.000034768585,0.00006481415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025516474,0.000020818676,0.000040506286,0.00008057424,0.00034453807,0.00011087809,0.000051093277,0.00020679127,0.00001539144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009271255,0.000010921886,0.0003761453,0.0000023997557,0.00001334835,0.0000012530969,0.0012534235,5.2717064e-7,0.000008159381,0.97520375,0.0073144897,0.01580629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003542518,0.000003921841,0.0007799283,0.00001312828,0.000014762287,0.000007031246,0.006483799,0.000019167715,0.0000079086285,0.05129234,0.9409875,0.000036208294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010150901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26076725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028782819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000464805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413833900","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198979937.003.0017","title":"Entick v Carrington [1765] 95 ER 807, King’s Bench","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02765314973302715,"score_gpt":0.2502699038478347,"score_spread":0.22261675411480755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413833900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008244566,0.00007512627,0.00017501987,0.00019239406,0.00026304054,0.00048625038,0.00014146163,0.00016278023,0.9984215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038679966,0.00047547815,0.00017113576,0.000097099626,0.000209738,0.0000018336777,0.0000270223,0.000019676781,0.99513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861854,0.000037986592,0.00016394668,0.0004592412,0.00037648596,0.00034380893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989608,0.000074844764,0.00017294534,0.0004603428,0.00015399887,0.00017709355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014691877,0.00024347841,0.00027356195,0.00010516311,0.0009269244,0.00010890359,0.00080166815,0.00042785116,0.00018539549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001288884,0.00029739607,0.00023489201,0.000018936353,0.00033865107,0.00010192824,0.000465385,0.00044223008,0.0000056078356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010092148,0.000008284573,0.000013212035,0.000029489644,0.00006631489,0.000014351381,0.0009974865,0.0000024739168,0.0000042165807,0.9879656,0.0066004884,0.0042879814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017449273,0.000010904436,0.000013177594,0.000090798676,0.00016791448,2.6402395e-7,0.00021322549,0.000012189533,0.000020997986,0.0027637056,0.9962353,0.00029701437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003802582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018869304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003340893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036746907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413846728","doi":"10.61784/jtfe3058","title":"CODE VERSUS PRECEDENT: BLOCKCHAIN-DRIVEN GOVERNANCE AS A RESPONSE TO THE CRISIS OF TRUSTS IN MODERN CANADIAN FINANCE","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of trends in financial and economics.","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blockchain; Corporate governance; Code (set theory); Financial crisis; Business; Accounting; Law and economics; Political science; Computer security; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Programming language; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.01889666350156592,"score_gpt":0.2978890596091559,"score_spread":0.27899239610758997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413846728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631952,0.00027711768,0.0000069861753,0.030585727,0.00025514548,0.00006516399,0.000052569878,0.0000010873151,0.0055609928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981399,0.0006295263,0.0001258611,0.00025259593,0.000071995884,0.0000069488174,2.6298943e-7,0.000002959483,0.0007699414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992384,0.000055404616,0.0003463193,0.00011350388,0.000056195175,0.00019023175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999515,0.00009436279,0.00017548344,0.0001047528,0.00003880489,0.00007162057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006576946,0.00006449287,0.00018850333,0.00021008431,0.00012974443,0.000030118876,0.00030408322,0.00006640145,0.000012715598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020392182,0.000057723046,0.00005750008,0.00038763043,0.000058702142,0.00007367988,0.000040160907,0.0001527194,0.0000014326696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063695787,0.00028465292,0.024226792,0.00002123611,0.00005974974,0.00004744579,0.06250561,0.06998598,0.00006296655,0.37101138,0.015786953,0.44963765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021850327,0.00019328647,0.48386133,0.00016207896,0.000019906043,0.000003121842,0.0017497181,0.0017255995,0.000086394866,0.008997622,0.50080943,0.00020650128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064599864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8257489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76114905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037049403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007025388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94162905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414002350","doi":"10.1017/9781009288743.016","title":"Index","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.024962027218617282,"score_gpt":0.26156285488841435,"score_spread":0.23660082766979706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414002350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038174153,0.00044942813,0.00163909,0.0003311736,0.0016063099,0.00086334033,0.0012139917,0.00011244071,0.9934025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0185547,0.0011213481,0.000036204445,0.00022528206,0.0007514784,0.00000468136,0.0001655759,0.000020598336,0.97912014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974087,0.00034360116,0.00028087088,0.00082858925,0.00046467676,0.0006735718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980573,0.00018963606,0.00031189565,0.00077349273,0.00031065533,0.00035701564],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022823446,0.00042077785,0.00051848136,0.0002082985,0.0016320203,0.00023745035,0.0016842744,0.0007604037,0.00009224532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003044811,0.00052845944,0.0003596979,0.00015623544,0.0007641237,0.00013175166,0.0009222168,0.0008858496,0.0016799961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032365522,0.000037279056,0.000011064307,0.0000871197,0.0001331131,0.000021743874,0.00031827958,0.000015419042,0.000007236789,0.4946976,0.5039453,0.00069346104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047348114,0.000017355767,0.000074471915,0.0001563798,0.00028488526,4.6319715e-7,0.001068174,0.0001876767,0.00006669125,0.0000016095667,0.9971578,0.00051100785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013832329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004956216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.494696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005572648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012711965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414071278","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10052","title":"The Subjects of Tort Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Delict; Doctrine; Private law; Subject (documents); Public law; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.016434396882441093,"score_gpt":0.3204014645644135,"score_spread":0.3039670676819724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414071278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09858276,0.0034138875,0.00020973176,0.025548639,0.00095798983,0.00021773772,0.00001719553,0.000008089712,0.871044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719554,0.00011732632,0.000093978175,0.0006567629,0.00012434229,0.000001948798,1.20391e-7,0.0000028835436,0.0018071127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918413,0.000065416534,0.00026238995,0.00006394092,0.00019423198,0.00022988918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989587,0.00017997167,0.00015464725,0.00016015541,0.00027120984,0.00027533286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007332049,0.00004894318,0.00010512377,0.000034095552,0.0009588054,0.0001099992,0.00063472986,0.000046821824,0.00003704872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012725218,0.00003734594,0.00007565398,0.00023573541,0.00074005796,0.00014925889,0.000013226074,0.00015489347,0.0000058506644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021150577,0.0000037438458,0.00082774734,0.0000031372501,0.00001042504,0.000006672512,0.0009114994,0.0000056578137,0.000052366075,0.9953013,0.0021288055,0.0007465048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005994452,0.000014259467,0.0018174952,0.000054449065,0.000013469944,0.000002282267,0.00055264577,0.0000013969449,0.0004885523,0.01755325,0.9794013,0.00004093701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17260191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78134286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013268107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025660214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8329078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414135228","doi":"10.1017/9781009335935.008","title":"Index","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Sample (material); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.02512086990694769,"score_gpt":0.27207632188809194,"score_spread":0.24695545198114424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414135228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000071190785,0.0001229959,0.0012119334,0.0002100755,0.00073495455,0.0004194104,0.00047246268,0.00008080482,0.99667615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00466921,0.0003446527,0.00002887371,0.00013623085,0.00036731455,0.0000028320333,0.00006949504,0.000009908797,0.9943715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988397,0.00014475119,0.000108665685,0.00035314172,0.00023812341,0.00031565764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991262,0.000080168764,0.00011389221,0.00037717508,0.00014885886,0.00015373038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011971037,0.00016534295,0.00022301843,0.00011625777,0.0008394417,0.000101637306,0.0008270635,0.00038467871,0.00006423573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018003211,0.00020602837,0.00014317132,0.00006083661,0.000316577,0.00006826179,0.00032948048,0.00040597812,0.00046575745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061290802,0.000007939138,0.000001536995,0.000022358594,0.000023708631,0.00000443946,0.00011234316,0.0000031566237,0.0000018792668,0.42026085,0.57912755,0.00042809814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001649149,0.000003963528,0.000015675389,0.000051477804,0.00004928812,1.4476373e-7,0.00041720344,0.000012038627,0.000032449207,9.168242e-7,0.9990447,0.00020719279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015645435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007676461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42025992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002980147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082710787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99090946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414324984","doi":"10.36644/mlr.124.1.tort","title":"Tort Law in a World of Scarce Compensatory Resources","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Tort; Damages; Delict; Strict liability; Vicarious liability; Mass tort; Bankruptcy; Plaintiff; Tort reform","score_opus":0.02353660793893506,"score_gpt":0.34467459605543654,"score_spread":0.32113798811650146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414324984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024048226,0.052078288,0.000006014574,0.007362529,0.000058033787,0.00060134096,0.000008159018,0.000037621125,0.9157998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848024,0.0047597657,0.00017131798,0.0069386736,0.00004167029,0.00002673963,0.0000027301712,0.000005120425,0.003251545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991329,0.00013940287,0.0002944721,0.00014812085,0.00013837725,0.00014672846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995344,0.000082328406,0.00007442617,0.00023339088,0.00003339441,0.00004202946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006301529,0.000064276326,0.0002486688,0.000028928704,0.0001637808,0.000018341456,0.0003018844,0.000026262993,0.00010564644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022147375,0.000059265487,0.00007500984,0.00048897206,0.00030987454,0.000056230947,0.00006252382,0.000097249904,0.000030621235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6449614e-7,0.00002807472,0.00034516575,0.00036187278,0.0000044911876,4.1281328e-7,0.00063993,3.1399767e-7,0.000059772574,0.9975138,0.0004274608,0.00061784405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005905109,0.0000023579712,0.0008537428,0.001647362,0.000016806302,6.989281e-8,0.00008716617,7.1325354e-7,0.00008188184,0.0019103362,0.9952839,0.00005661453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010047681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17610188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99560344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026271146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006927361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414595108","doi":"10.17803/2713-0533.2025.3.33.635-666","title":"Criminal Offenses in Public Procurement in Albania: A Legal and Institutional Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kutafin Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Procurement; Enforcement; Law enforcement; Call for bids; Audit; Criminal law; Money laundering","score_opus":0.05055157622112452,"score_gpt":0.36455892634233356,"score_spread":0.31400735012120906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414595108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09552836,0.15771641,0.0008152903,0.14420718,0.0001651118,0.0033356235,0.000037686215,0.00010395822,0.5980904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840448,0.0132371355,0.00024846513,0.0019753433,0.000020929137,0.00017240563,0.000008437211,0.0000018140685,0.00029065672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990118,0.00012032425,0.00028452597,0.000213851,0.0001851914,0.00018431804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968326,0.000047510293,0.00004584164,0.00012327786,0.00005010634,0.000050029605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007792203,0.00007298135,0.0002431571,0.000116474075,0.0002048763,0.00007972123,0.0001543271,0.000038300892,0.000099026474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014853085,0.00006572865,0.00006276671,0.0015625915,0.00020499849,0.00019334085,0.000058490732,0.00011142072,0.0000085599495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4984483e-7,0.00006923135,0.0032060372,0.00027089473,0.000020223495,0.0000025702295,0.00012771797,0.0000038035935,0.0000027804779,0.99063545,0.00019957853,0.005460783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011369404,0.000004328091,0.014209134,0.0004980641,0.00012357313,4.3127383e-7,0.000056123397,0.000034623325,0.0000020173784,0.0013517669,0.98353106,0.00007517876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0095677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09809972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013724531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033973978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414861736","doi":"10.1093/9780191991295.001.0001","title":"Administrative Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Tribunal; Public law; Judicial review; Core (optical fiber); Immigration; Common law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.0646369657806431,"score_gpt":0.3919091224871435,"score_spread":0.3272721567065004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414861736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.2833841e-7,0.00004629395,0.00008647225,0.0038007584,0.00008574713,0.00021149103,0.000041066232,0.000079271456,0.99564874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00061947055,0.000047508347,0.0001887112,0.0010354895,0.0003101676,0.00002285578,0.000027264603,0.0000039085307,0.9977446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994815,0.000018610497,0.00009359195,0.00014641437,0.00014909022,0.000110776964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961334,0.00009440631,0.000039856066,0.00013925096,0.000056533132,0.00005661431],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000099382276,0.00006960858,0.0000973775,0.000014573583,0.00037393894,0.00006717184,0.00022221639,0.00016801864,0.0016307757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013911256,0.000064238695,0.00006253784,0.00004115315,0.00023543963,0.000034900004,0.000038737053,0.00014301068,0.00034889622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.5152272e-7,0.000004219105,1.5405911e-7,0.0000029161295,0.000005848222,3.9297322e-7,0.00027132407,2.3845622e-8,7.24864e-8,0.7621929,0.23716448,0.00035743092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015665097,0.0000034750035,7.2421204e-7,0.000013085769,0.000009264222,2.106303e-8,0.00014746192,2.0372171e-7,0.0000026947575,0.1399081,0.8598351,0.00006420584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015564915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018295787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62267065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012394233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017676312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415816470","doi":"10.37419/jpl.v12.i1.3","title":"A Comparison of Inadequate Doctrines: The Canadian “honour of the Crown” and the U.S. Federal Trust Responsibility","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Journal of Property Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Public policy; Legislation","score_opus":0.04022887612960438,"score_gpt":0.34592552691432343,"score_spread":0.3056966507847191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415816470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7778115,0.0009068603,0.000026500733,0.11960286,0.00018515291,0.0007304406,0.000012100394,0.0000050593057,0.1007195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965916,0.000039889237,0.000045366658,0.00054482184,0.000057587007,0.0000031178406,9.2413195e-8,0.0000028377997,0.0027146318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984141,0.00059292815,0.00046591804,0.000081220904,0.00028264016,0.00016319618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987678,0.00028255,0.00034293332,0.00024165168,0.0002936109,0.00007147438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028949075,0.00006964687,0.00023669556,0.000031079686,0.0012292438,0.00010433977,0.00065108016,0.000051363728,0.000030301135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046306878,0.000023924862,0.00011503314,0.00030727073,0.001541594,0.00009305251,0.00008397518,0.00035220577,9.698005e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000303773,0.00009313748,0.03614337,0.000028561446,0.00007982636,8.962215e-7,0.010392992,0.00006723606,0.0001314124,0.9449546,0.0022862477,0.005517948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017992652,0.00010059712,0.14718556,0.0002021659,0.00014222729,0.000009799926,0.006992167,0.00046771675,0.0017579463,0.024285546,0.81691146,0.00014556262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.375276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63450724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9206691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010579731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012412245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9454474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415871654","doi":"10.7202/1121062ar","title":"Les conséquences de la violation de l’article 1275 du <i>Code civil du Québec</i>  : réflexions sur l’affaire <i>Fiducie Historia</i>","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Private life; Context (archaeology); Historicity (philosophy)","score_opus":0.013113354954964082,"score_gpt":0.2650076163842669,"score_spread":0.2518942614293028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415871654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51718646,0.007476555,0.007364573,0.16491069,0.0008060195,0.0005397925,0.00012855796,0.000288704,0.30129865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840875,0.0020140212,0.00088753295,0.0014916322,0.0010727814,0.0001287459,0.0000116126075,0.000028885604,0.010277262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974973,0.00053974835,0.00047910397,0.00048386914,0.000220482,0.0007795039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790096,0.0009963097,0.00021310788,0.000408387,0.00016730701,0.00031390414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014222622,0.00020406778,0.00032175684,0.00007702212,0.001246537,0.00021822855,0.00058086944,0.00037418556,0.0004234373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006272605,0.00030060037,0.00024600534,0.0008058519,0.00097569154,0.00039651315,0.000105831336,0.00044140243,0.0001287392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020208368,0.00036446415,0.057178997,0.00015176921,0.000060244594,0.000027075977,0.008273287,0.00066068885,0.0034346136,0.90055376,0.019289263,0.009985636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048284724,0.000037812097,0.007248342,0.00034432596,0.00023854336,0.000041723615,0.0023734423,0.006563838,0.0012648562,0.10711942,0.8738631,0.0004217407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12368366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14548339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85457385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026613774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026965272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415983967","doi":"10.56397/slj.2025.10.01","title":"Analysis of Breen v Williams: A Critical Examination of the Doctor-Patient Fiduciary Relationship","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Law and Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Legislature; Divergence (linguistics); Empirical examination; Medical law; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.05882619581379661,"score_gpt":0.4030037334883899,"score_spread":0.3441775376745933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415983967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77538353,0.009727053,0.00030989893,0.00594865,0.0009722938,0.0006290609,0.00013870321,0.00001063127,0.20688018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981247,0.0010405256,0.0000874378,0.00022950221,0.000038041093,0.000025378711,0.0000014533891,0.0000023922357,0.0004505569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839324,0.00038070415,0.0005451983,0.00023721253,0.00027711067,0.00016655376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963272,0.0028935769,0.0001641619,0.0002484963,0.000338719,0.00002781706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079839106,0.00010040026,0.00034327744,0.000120246325,0.00071689225,0.000016598737,0.00018853944,0.00008821043,0.0000146665225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018707463,0.00007900513,0.00011191923,0.0023413172,0.0029758345,0.00012001731,0.00028066768,0.00015921463,4.9008133e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068599293,0.00011948511,0.009998189,0.0003271634,0.0003211036,2.028732e-7,0.025165532,0.00020505421,0.000007749715,0.9627872,0.000055029544,0.0010064357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048374158,0.00012021381,0.7447329,0.00095183303,0.01678579,2.0413485e-7,0.18939066,0.0029247175,0.000114296294,0.028928777,0.015247958,0.00031888616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013596949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004678228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083351304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008072815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416060786","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192843364.003.0020","title":"Conditions, Warranties, and Indemnities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Context (archaeology); Warranty; Collateral; Principal (computer security); Process (computing); Indemnity","score_opus":0.028772706851463395,"score_gpt":0.24856259428184263,"score_spread":0.21978988743037925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416060786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000058922207,0.00011303054,0.00005799391,0.00021093099,0.00007615206,0.00028172493,0.0003514798,0.00009696081,0.99875283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029559003,0.0012944025,0.0000699107,0.00008533643,0.00007538861,0.0000011581509,0.00003276327,0.000008141039,0.995477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993621,0.000024690482,0.00008760883,0.00021408372,0.00015837862,0.00015313257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994963,0.00007935238,0.00008452213,0.00017526101,0.00007723865,0.00008733719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007536315,0.0001316794,0.00016474364,0.00006942828,0.0008993373,0.00007028764,0.00025888009,0.000252546,0.000070715774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000064428204,0.00016098011,0.00006827081,0.0000067859373,0.00057965645,0.000080905054,0.00018972582,0.00023229321,7.604394e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057504844,0.0000025983377,0.0000050892995,0.000022547858,0.000039404676,0.0000056527256,0.00089013355,1.7583828e-7,6.2429984e-7,0.9899615,0.0069141574,0.0021523363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012750183,0.000006133008,0.000010511838,0.000064180495,0.000084320236,3.4541617e-7,0.0006683724,0.0000023099904,0.0000031141253,0.009150492,0.98972,0.00016273005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001008314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058062514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98280585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009031373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023989684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6917066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416060787","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192843364.003.0021","title":"Exemption Clauses and Unfair Contract Terms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Statutory law; Good faith; Presumption; Transparency (behavior); Liability; Legislation; Fair dealing; Bad faith; Force majeure","score_opus":0.02664558043709554,"score_gpt":0.25336864684147453,"score_spread":0.226723066404379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416060787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013435603,0.00005188719,0.00012795044,0.00020687614,0.000073290736,0.0003727755,0.00011541376,0.00010541323,0.998812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011661297,0.000986158,0.00008334384,0.00007419367,0.000104141676,0.0000010590071,0.000015868152,0.000009207074,0.9870647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992685,0.000025714911,0.00009729089,0.00027319466,0.00016475063,0.00017054996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994297,0.000082610895,0.00011461627,0.00020337665,0.00006286113,0.00010680999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009331398,0.00014667309,0.00018018896,0.00007219972,0.00059712713,0.00007806397,0.00026608328,0.00029273995,0.000044973076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007653165,0.00016727322,0.000080206584,0.000006802631,0.00032864953,0.00010056613,0.00017137725,0.00023595046,9.971268e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015102076,0.000004659306,0.000016591468,0.000018053312,0.000033982597,0.000007668157,0.00048248013,3.2186742e-7,0.000004691383,0.9865511,0.0014939429,0.011371402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017966834,0.000010328906,0.0000576128,0.00007171854,0.000096510295,3.5162242e-7,0.000103950435,0.000006891633,0.00000732473,0.0034336182,0.9958582,0.00017381005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011057031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000979846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99436426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011925694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013138054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6821204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416178518","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5740622","title":"Justiciability in Private Law: Religion and Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Politics; Private law; Pretext; Political question; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.013796972780394998,"score_gpt":0.3233216466392558,"score_spread":0.3095246738588608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416178518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8406777,0.007202469,0.004849544,0.026436014,0.00076682656,0.0011448596,0.00004844015,0.00011513122,0.11875906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781692,0.01867118,0.00015814338,0.00022642214,0.00046392274,0.000016468897,0.0000040143295,0.000007076631,0.0022835415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743664,0.0002061177,0.00033133957,0.00027098952,0.00023530138,0.0015196368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993493,0.00010555714,0.00015168982,0.00020939056,0.00008484081,0.00009922028],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025500532,0.0001337792,0.0002096241,0.00008565041,0.0005122011,0.00014254793,0.00038060776,0.00025115968,0.000004589861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019267308,0.00013440284,0.00007777263,0.00014240324,0.00020609923,0.000072659466,0.00029177466,0.003336044,0.0000033729918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003451328,0.00003360857,0.0015003202,0.000021328922,0.000016357182,5.726984e-7,0.00064201123,0.00005248453,0.000002367799,0.9964481,0.000024440316,0.001254951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001258411,0.0000147705005,0.0005781161,0.000062328945,0.00003082996,0.0000033934534,0.0006318608,0.000049811726,0.000003935674,0.93819433,0.060180258,0.00012450654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019864889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08354327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13749157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020628094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055383225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290307","doi":"10.29173/alr2813","title":"Charter Rights and Regulation by Financial Incentives","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Charter; Covert; Incentive; Unconscionability; Financial crisis","score_opus":0.008242287274447011,"score_gpt":0.29370485345825875,"score_spread":0.2854625661838117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004136791,0.30531067,0.00012559425,0.059998758,0.00049747,0.0023167697,0.000036715086,0.000026475862,0.6275507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7337647,0.16424526,0.000053810294,0.012036782,0.00025415962,0.00018024599,0.000051756386,0.000012030148,0.08940125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984519,0.00020187673,0.00044812213,0.00043186155,0.00018103281,0.00028522877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911785,0.00021844845,0.00017103988,0.0003043395,0.0000806853,0.0001076303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036348586,0.0001842596,0.00037655004,0.000016347076,0.0010332895,0.0001228042,0.00024334797,0.00012501875,0.00065932603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008666967,0.00016087256,0.00011094786,0.0005344612,0.00045404685,0.00033555418,0.000107313244,0.00014043383,0.00016879743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001908603,0.00005106015,0.00004347505,0.0005788415,0.000015905613,9.893376e-8,0.00032296675,1.7841556e-8,0.000015393643,0.94202816,0.04468072,0.012261438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013052761,0.000011128367,0.0004829374,0.0028146843,0.00014784507,2.4963038e-7,0.0000063202688,0.000013998106,0.00003644076,0.014329027,0.9818568,0.0001700008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019915236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013808796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004527284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119556404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98661125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416431124","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198890485.013.0001","title":"Formalities and Secret Trusts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Doctrine; Intersection (aeronautics); Enforcement; Compliance (psychology); Common law; Estoppel; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.026503509567070604,"score_gpt":0.24187770267086064,"score_spread":0.21537419310379005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416431124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006261471,0.00006254102,0.00009416337,0.00015577611,0.000060053353,0.00026850638,0.00017023164,0.00008547211,0.99904066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018338093,0.000734127,0.00011538119,0.000067492016,0.000079798396,6.519155e-7,0.000014298029,0.000007855334,0.9971466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993529,0.00001944356,0.000083291874,0.000209324,0.00015836213,0.00017668062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950653,0.000060992545,0.00008039342,0.00018526927,0.00006359404,0.00010322395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008995931,0.0001317512,0.00016123087,0.000067217276,0.00064424175,0.00006745472,0.00028247182,0.00024364835,0.00005056008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005505833,0.000155179,0.00007593887,0.0000057634484,0.00034367794,0.00009303543,0.00025342838,0.00020105742,5.2802415e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000921762,0.0000016222921,0.000003948387,0.000027424952,0.000028750634,0.0000049006285,0.0012735022,1.8787779e-7,2.7653343e-7,0.99126405,0.0024249663,0.0049611554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012272474,0.000007798871,0.000006465139,0.00004869769,0.00006776953,3.1019783e-7,0.00052696385,0.000006978859,0.0000034013071,0.006505723,0.99254376,0.00015942928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010091268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007557827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99011874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093391915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017746145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63280165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416527739","doi":"10.1017/9781009322737.002","title":"Guiding Principles","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.07003704338495115,"score_gpt":0.2577120601221531,"score_spread":0.18767501673720194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416527739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017843166,0.00020839744,0.0010561915,0.0003723704,0.0005893824,0.0011854414,0.00061463413,0.00024075632,0.9955544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014970383,0.0013278418,0.00028420723,0.0001556638,0.00044868703,0.0000031300483,0.000038592672,0.000041425716,0.9827301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672467,0.00014799433,0.0005307139,0.0011700698,0.00065794936,0.0007686371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971191,0.00028716982,0.00056890084,0.0010671893,0.00047370323,0.00048390738],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044820618,0.0006495337,0.0006899968,0.00028547845,0.0027364956,0.00026175712,0.0019175521,0.0008237375,0.000044567154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006549612,0.00083707744,0.000609921,0.0000539401,0.0012527031,0.00022989964,0.0016335349,0.0006353111,0.00007978684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004011885,0.000024937757,0.000006627235,0.0001075337,0.0002148529,0.00006527309,0.0003717795,0.000009548297,0.000045198776,0.9825674,0.013790233,0.0027564394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004225904,0.000028630098,0.000022077855,0.00040528068,0.00049963105,0.0000020167938,0.00066127133,0.00020548895,0.0002065792,0.000029423652,0.9967318,0.0007851716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033835003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006276341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000732382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088088715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416909287","doi":"10.1177/07398913251394086a","title":"Book Review: <i>Authority</i> by Jonathon Leeman <i>Authority</i> . By LeemanJonathon. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. 312pp. $22.99.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Christian Education Journal Research on Educational Ministry","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Taylor College and Seminary","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03496794561304315,"score_gpt":0.44628161230144975,"score_spread":0.4113136666884066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416909287","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023888133,0.29622838,0.00022356815,0.5733517,0.003149712,0.0014321719,0.00042431403,0.00011850758,0.12268283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0966804,0.1437028,0.00083602633,0.07627215,0.006582619,0.0015785755,0.0008879778,0.00016560336,0.6732938],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256825,0.0014244332,0.0011863833,0.0010004994,0.0025426482,0.001277783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926617,0.0015434576,0.0004792823,0.00090643513,0.002810922,0.0015981892],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059249597,0.0004348089,0.0004960363,0.00047913435,0.005395034,0.0011889423,0.0018516483,0.0003969471,0.005373404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049024834,0.00045858196,0.00030093148,0.0021113688,0.0012815973,0.0007579057,0.00016884491,0.0026516884,0.0007701551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029868614,0.0016606,0.00018321912,0.00024656477,0.00003845877,0.00000184745,0.0008781823,8.1507824e-7,0.00039989172,0.061981402,0.92994034,0.00463878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026701015,0.000081551676,0.00050359213,0.0011961099,0.000039932518,0.00002458284,0.0045798193,0.000002939156,0.00041927735,0.01000561,0.9824793,0.00040031134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067301077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038466605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.550611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015987769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019648457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417194292","doi":"10.7202/1119960ar","title":"“Disorderly Conduct\": Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.17307554263690136,"score_gpt":0.46330803512285196,"score_spread":0.2902324924859506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417194292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09136338,0.033557028,0.001877992,0.15069123,0.018938657,0.0016422165,0.00007989282,0.0007009872,0.7011486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861801,0.0012768477,0.0006574424,0.00090368954,0.00974751,0.00006767637,0.00001009953,0.000013095783,0.0011435177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998078,0.0002557039,0.00027074586,0.00028432533,0.00038876443,0.00072247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919176,0.00024941686,0.000044031054,0.00011289534,0.00026075516,0.00014113773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063650473,0.00015888047,0.0002545652,0.000028283996,0.0016936203,0.0000648577,0.00020534653,0.00017783282,0.000118640746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001592794,0.00014042712,0.00008120685,0.0004580234,0.0009844167,0.0004386098,0.000110781795,0.00035323916,0.00012391018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050237077,0.00014679035,0.00093924586,0.00007391217,0.000033922468,0.0000020766583,0.08813159,5.80896e-7,0.000103131904,0.84394705,0.065762796,0.0008538461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016059805,0.000011155154,0.0033243983,0.000006603314,0.00017236595,0.00000276399,0.14364466,0.0000012957474,0.000013036432,0.006285655,0.8461609,0.00021655623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003810161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044234845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89481676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019972648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042808846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417288380","doi":"10.1017/9781009356848.017","title":"Index","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Sample (material); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.026103486427772465,"score_gpt":0.2644696399017833,"score_spread":0.23836615347401083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417288380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046394605,0.00026910673,0.0026715705,0.00033312198,0.0015515499,0.0011946736,0.0012005421,0.00011341504,0.9922021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04279969,0.0011368466,0.000037930302,0.00022094892,0.000580679,0.000005893983,0.00009207053,0.000023567663,0.9551024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966641,0.0004447841,0.00037729507,0.0010762428,0.0005785748,0.00085901626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974777,0.0002317346,0.00042034444,0.00096247415,0.00043455188,0.00047321175],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002897842,0.0005423897,0.00065188215,0.00026802695,0.0023793294,0.00031066616,0.002203919,0.0009594727,0.00012112403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035892517,0.0007002762,0.00047623288,0.00020791405,0.0011250789,0.00020594025,0.0012735595,0.0011168479,0.0007598935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045113018,0.00004988135,0.000009049512,0.00011069226,0.00012708592,0.000021389942,0.00037892393,0.000022202665,0.000009376796,0.56518793,0.43267673,0.0013615995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059374474,0.000023213144,0.00008600563,0.00019387908,0.0002838747,8.6456225e-7,0.0016783146,0.0002822553,0.00009819645,0.0000017199885,0.99609774,0.00066017656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01659802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056315756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5651862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073301623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018720373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417383891","doi":"10.5040/9781509937820","title":"Medical Negligence and the Duty to Advise","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Autonomy; Duty; Doctrine; Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Damages; Supreme court; Medical malpractice; Medical law","score_opus":0.020722405484008295,"score_gpt":0.2971743930613344,"score_spread":0.27645198757732614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417383891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014057761,0.0003839951,0.0006809115,0.09913841,0.0010231312,0.0016364383,0.00009105585,0.00012656886,0.89677894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04190179,0.000365948,0.00023506286,0.018005664,0.0025002623,0.0005029835,0.000026541344,0.000038338185,0.9364234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945125,0.0005583718,0.0008812384,0.0010795911,0.0021052018,0.0008630799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951148,0.0020185374,0.00034908295,0.0009966942,0.0004554379,0.0010654281],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059048054,0.00046514205,0.0006812754,0.00017915151,0.0031090924,0.007415581,0.0032028263,0.0009182732,0.0007561846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058764345,0.0003408976,0.00028746002,0.00032867366,0.002420431,0.00083754153,0.00216116,0.0020212363,0.00014263633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028267708,0.000015705466,0.000009666592,0.000046773246,0.0000453927,0.0000053253607,0.0081314435,0.0000010443935,0.0000013906446,0.7750435,0.1616598,0.055011723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052682724,0.000016353153,0.000059570673,0.0005465658,0.00009772053,0.0000030960352,0.0009246297,0.00014947471,0.000005731401,0.025320765,0.97197527,0.00037399904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046861623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040879482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8103155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025365452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005451251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417415110","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2599683","title":"Non-ideal justice in holdings, or rectification revisited","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Rectification; Work (physics); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.07263389805258906,"score_gpt":0.43750807838300854,"score_spread":0.36487418033041946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417415110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018651586,0.00544941,0.00034004098,0.40766245,0.00035380694,0.00044511934,0.00007709922,0.00003095666,0.583776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98115486,0.008661216,0.00024506135,0.00885434,0.00068025157,0.00004516744,0.000016068947,0.0000049342343,0.00033812053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873924,0.00009302509,0.00044115778,0.00020687393,0.00028022024,0.00023950367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882627,0.0005966639,0.000047802183,0.000080368125,0.00032988033,0.00011903308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055633456,0.000086298925,0.00024348476,0.00007893102,0.00025826102,0.000038782204,0.0002303322,0.00009138817,0.00018436587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038797937,0.00007570068,0.00008049038,0.00037274466,0.0005459536,0.00012606193,0.000067758796,0.00018106749,0.000012559423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000145577815,0.00008112095,0.00026419843,0.001377336,0.000008074304,0.0000011617286,0.00010058179,1.2134596e-8,0.000020017418,0.9951401,0.0015476572,0.001445183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028659587,0.000026413963,0.008072295,0.0046294164,0.00012220575,0.0000010588212,0.00034820303,0.000029328809,0.00003931846,0.6469321,0.33932716,0.00018585673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042608162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002204252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012249599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015733704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46447557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417465812","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198890485.013.0044","title":"Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Trust law; Work (physics); Private law; Public law","score_opus":0.022218184594640512,"score_gpt":0.24023430314613695,"score_spread":0.21801611855149644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417465812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025807517,0.000021057995,0.00028182523,0.0009722259,0.00021862569,0.00026490862,0.000055852022,0.00012355912,0.9980594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00014215113,0.00033461797,0.00014427639,0.00004231128,0.00069347897,6.40276e-7,0.000019894183,0.000008159134,0.9986145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993034,0.000021717407,0.00008046216,0.00026737235,0.0001757501,0.00015131973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994318,0.00003020382,0.00009046959,0.00027307525,0.00009807378,0.00007637284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009202341,0.00011626407,0.0001342269,0.00007659658,0.00058129814,0.000044011555,0.0003493142,0.00024384534,0.00016617746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007639358,0.00014490388,0.00010412582,0.000008914746,0.0002193872,0.00006327458,0.00015830235,0.00024496403,0.000003820228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008057408,0.0000032483335,2.8867618e-7,0.000009454646,0.000026311009,0.0000028898453,0.00026698242,0.0000011873308,0.0000011616272,0.94738704,0.04245204,0.009841345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007656478,0.0000056130557,9.581655e-7,0.000018292663,0.00007069651,1.5064059e-7,0.00012736248,0.000002732767,0.000006167676,0.0030040005,0.99654937,0.0001381164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005448017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003513764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95409733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002070771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020453047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5909009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417465832","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198890485.013.0027","title":"Pension Funds","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Flexibility (engineering); Statute; Foundation (evidence); Private pension; Common law","score_opus":0.03785018371329782,"score_gpt":0.2577625652979564,"score_spread":0.21991238158465856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417465832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013603296,0.00003227169,0.00016887023,0.00022828994,0.00012888016,0.00029778434,0.000079528196,0.00012761937,0.9989232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001100425,0.00041028572,0.00013657159,0.00008167634,0.00012569409,5.622233e-7,0.000015422293,0.000010535648,0.9981188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991738,0.000024961195,0.00009304356,0.00028043118,0.00023309232,0.00019466899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930215,0.000061220344,0.00010167749,0.00031128209,0.00010893659,0.000114747716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009937134,0.00014525735,0.0001720409,0.00008368826,0.0007457615,0.00005200178,0.00046984956,0.00031560936,0.00011947227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007353751,0.00017413837,0.00014243968,0.0000095464475,0.00024168252,0.00006050409,0.00029439048,0.00027678622,0.00000394934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010253668,0.000004014684,0.0000017605828,0.000012182152,0.000024079176,0.000010259293,0.00034936014,6.2379934e-7,0.000001456993,0.9822987,0.01065193,0.0066354317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011425604,0.000007866422,0.0000048009906,0.000055814988,0.000078263314,1.6795143e-7,0.00011651924,0.0000059785716,0.000005281926,0.0031700989,0.9962645,0.0001764171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011670298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008820797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98561263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018336035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027021277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7101157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417465864","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198890485.013.0012","title":"Trustee Liability for Trust Claims and Trust Creditors’ Direct Access to Trust Assets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Express trust; Trust law; Liability; Blind trust; Security interest; Debtor; Balance (ability); Settlor","score_opus":0.04234674374534089,"score_gpt":0.2958059287846187,"score_spread":0.2534591850392778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417465864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008100001,0.000026508471,0.00035940413,0.0005906142,0.00068346754,0.0022974575,0.001360728,0.00019747969,0.99367434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057303375,0.00019085486,0.0004214537,0.00014299463,0.0009039785,0.000028629125,0.000054519536,0.000035906953,0.9924913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786454,0.000071682305,0.00029163997,0.0008847139,0.0003968364,0.00049060123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805737,0.00038067877,0.00022946863,0.0006382157,0.0002836712,0.00041061273],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004228531,0.00039857035,0.0005670622,0.00019558547,0.001394312,0.0003661613,0.0012271117,0.0006488221,0.00008216981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009059434,0.00045551176,0.0002838025,0.000043275046,0.00047304915,0.00028549376,0.00075360417,0.00039964018,0.0000012025512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015260173,0.000028499775,0.000170022,0.0001324652,0.0001078207,0.0000064202095,0.0008662739,0.0000049405025,0.0000029739315,0.95960253,0.02716243,0.011762993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004563508,0.000055178232,0.00018922989,0.00008529405,0.0002513576,3.4021633e-7,0.00019573457,0.000041961313,0.000028935356,0.0027697135,0.9954516,0.00047429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009771482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011362141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043663898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004722681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417513428","doi":"10.1086/738305","title":": <i>Wrongs and Rights Come Apart</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Bill of rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.043773567484217395,"score_gpt":0.40163271503043807,"score_spread":0.35785914754622067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417513428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044051535,0.00023558117,0.00090103934,0.13046128,0.00020960382,0.00017583389,0.000005701924,0.00009683416,0.8238626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98274654,0.00009415092,0.00026426977,0.0025699565,0.00006690291,0.000008686132,0.0000010118945,0.0000014271146,0.014247031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995905,0.000057731828,0.00005843088,0.000086707114,0.00011060001,0.00009600646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995409,0.0002771365,0.000014273294,0.00008452952,0.000042713422,0.000040418345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005000489,0.000029283523,0.00004403482,0.000013588018,0.0007745339,0.000056228855,0.000097057644,0.00010040371,0.000030082703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000104254046,0.000026333268,0.000013131759,0.00013037841,0.00023909309,0.000049475595,0.000037869082,0.0002638729,0.000030119798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2850124e-7,0.0000068440686,0.00036589635,0.000003935934,0.0000021236485,1.7198965e-7,0.005092347,4.0269381e-7,0.00001935827,0.99161136,0.002536778,0.00036034803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004155324,0.0000017654635,0.0008308332,0.0000065195063,0.0000037504437,4.2743434e-8,0.00032785133,0.000009380149,0.00005706795,0.11158492,0.88710684,0.000029497842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023698695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004555513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.938695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016793196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012300014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5957167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W45778138","doi":"","title":"PROBING THE FRONTIERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Citizenship; Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Immigration; Jurisprudence; Commission; Common law; High Court; Sociology","score_opus":0.04596288215636862,"score_gpt":0.23325606677219998,"score_spread":0.18729318461583136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W45778138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9096972,0.000058348713,0.004796364,0.00091847975,0.000057561818,0.0005059346,0.00081724604,0.00006463095,0.08308423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936583,0.00006229827,0.0022152541,0.000015824548,0.000025214747,8.794921e-8,0.000009914183,0.000012521032,0.004000576],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859184,0.00023175101,0.00019528762,0.00031359855,0.00036591227,0.00030162866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854416,0.00008348285,0.0005103976,0.00042472212,0.00029029965,0.00014691621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005598704,0.00016847557,0.00036932004,0.00009931308,0.0007950124,0.000009264319,0.00093964074,0.00018199338,0.00063013204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019739917,0.00016825972,0.00025795036,0.0002889946,0.0020913114,0.00014306547,0.00019612856,0.00018734635,0.0001751193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005782357,0.00032768326,0.10361261,0.00006326901,0.00040122037,0.000022808166,0.82225746,0.000022750562,0.00018823023,0.07078464,0.0005321921,0.0012089106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011300258,0.00008524932,0.007480548,0.000081119484,0.00021099427,0.0000013076678,0.95696354,0.000064439344,0.00014811961,0.0059093894,0.0276143,0.00031099064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09174923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024553696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13470607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055994344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021631861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99324566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W48464655","doi":"10.29173/alr370","title":"Prior Occupation and Schismatic Principles: Toward a Normative Theorization of Aboriginal Title","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Proxy (statistics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Function (biology); Political science; Identity (music); Natural (archaeology); Computer science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052617168008824364,"score_gpt":0.3695288195396225,"score_spread":0.31691165153079814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W48464655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003495456,0.006558749,0.0008134756,0.002819008,0.00007415742,0.0006319006,0.0000054802167,0.000018566196,0.9855832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98363835,0.010394779,0.0014329266,0.00070249353,0.00008813908,0.00005098856,0.000018283225,0.000008028466,0.0036660307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961996,0.000051418865,0.00012077353,0.00005577566,0.00010063506,0.000051456125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996851,0.00004931685,0.00007924747,0.000076108336,0.0000665145,0.000043676962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002511564,0.00003323124,0.00008574892,0.000006986963,0.000054507385,0.000011577434,0.00006121605,0.000017734632,0.00011617715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106765394,0.000026419515,0.00001599073,0.00010548185,0.0000685395,0.00009772491,0.0000104096935,0.000025430163,0.00016371261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.132473e-7,0.000007656679,0.00008837021,0.00014910496,0.000002640335,2.298677e-8,0.0017617568,2.5127878e-7,7.9462586e-7,0.99549854,0.00042580065,0.002064557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042848646,0.0000074328054,0.00008589616,0.0002475647,0.000019674228,2.755882e-7,0.000078638695,0.000030220233,0.000008335976,0.0020870126,0.9973553,0.00003683202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022407456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071214995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99692947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018367178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009148372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3387352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55456004","doi":"10.7202/029381ar","title":"Reasonable Notice Criteria in Common Law Wrongful Dismissal Cases","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux (Québec); Queen's University; Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services; Ontario Ministry of Labour","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Dismissal; Law; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.04553619362535167,"score_gpt":0.3428057293681562,"score_spread":0.2972695357428045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55456004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5362655,0.00028226958,0.00010645991,0.0314468,0.00008756858,0.00033719838,0.000036246354,0.000112829526,0.4313251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886034,0.00004218929,0.00065507035,0.00020565536,0.0003119533,0.000031947755,0.000020156333,0.000009248071,0.010120363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990502,0.000112063506,0.00023640181,0.00016982992,0.00018059046,0.00025093387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992556,0.0003460583,0.000058659916,0.00019347362,0.00004411782,0.000102063335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032490765,0.00008135747,0.000106674626,0.000053008083,0.0007273737,0.00009886369,0.00018477754,0.00019843927,0.00074904825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013111295,0.0000862648,0.0000339033,0.0004436353,0.00020323129,0.0003801334,0.00004317795,0.00030071082,0.00025458186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050429153,0.00014595441,0.007962143,6.609712e-7,0.000005677108,0.000005364763,0.0035392016,0.00083011476,0.000019081099,0.9701195,0.010107567,0.007259729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016462922,0.0000086167565,0.0033448273,0.000019942318,0.000011192786,0.0000021728827,0.0028344728,0.0005565041,0.00006312053,0.0023691347,0.99049884,0.00012655887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01104489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02155713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98039126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016227608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016890588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W561782764","doi":"","title":"Tort law in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Kluwer Law International eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Liability; Strict liability; Duty of care; Liability insurance; Causation; Vicarious liability; Legal liability; Business; Damages; Delict; Product liability; Duty; Joint and several liability; Law; Compensation (psychology); Actuarial science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Private law; Psychology; Public law","score_opus":0.014723750734452938,"score_gpt":0.27285471801736166,"score_spread":0.25813096728290874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W561782764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012263308,0.000015283418,0.000004708758,0.001533772,0.001505136,0.00025783686,0.00016336546,0.000031517884,0.9963657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14472602,0.0000057061075,0.00008317104,0.0025221691,0.001112671,0.000060475217,0.0000794298,0.000025016965,0.85138535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983839,0.000024775532,0.0003092146,0.0002983885,0.0007278825,0.00025587974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992374,0.000099023986,0.00013906478,0.00023726466,0.00015646461,0.0001307385],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020736035,0.00016317396,0.00018046961,0.000036757658,0.0002331832,0.00010828773,0.0007932721,0.00023346425,0.0009964743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001812531,0.00017570217,0.00007825167,0.00001635833,0.0002760877,0.00006921074,0.000121616984,0.00063362246,0.00009371946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024697058,0.000006982921,0.000019476625,0.0000028276875,0.000017884562,0.000014020274,0.00027169994,0.000001606485,0.000007247555,0.9839946,0.015156468,0.0005047365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009896226,0.0000020748068,0.00003026107,0.00003124758,0.000006314166,9.855299e-7,0.000047734567,0.0000054433767,0.000021140875,0.05624979,0.94332135,0.0001846884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98804426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9281649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018849088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005424291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570597377","doi":"","title":"CHANGING CANADIAN CUSTOMS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation & distribution","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Subtitle; International trade; Transport engineering; Marketing; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.012451854738148454,"score_gpt":0.27158047976616645,"score_spread":0.259128625028018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570597377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9024245,0.00004040343,0.005722912,0.007073325,0.00011221346,0.00041502144,0.0012551644,0.00021420329,0.082742214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954631,0.000043961194,0.000026866823,0.00013469084,0.00009956183,0.000027378881,0.0018750492,0.0000040951577,0.0023253418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993467,0.000019224117,0.00011259349,0.000112695554,0.00014403946,0.00026476156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996799,0.000008582029,0.000020924435,0.00007130615,0.000047797566,0.00017148991],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016687327,0.000048978316,0.0000465708,0.00003038459,0.00070401427,0.000036306792,0.0000787581,0.000055392247,0.0027208535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000051709126,0.000055621007,0.000036190802,0.00037404345,0.00005496464,0.00016534836,2.7079793e-7,0.000055734516,0.00033143305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009439971,0.00004321126,0.003375283,0.0000062845957,0.000009657729,0.0000046105924,0.01295612,0.00056263164,0.000045159482,0.8920732,0.0020842974,0.088830076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008907224,0.0000037432824,0.042314973,0.000004902769,0.000011135241,9.715043e-8,0.0010761353,0.000051167135,0.00006123058,0.00074955187,0.9555514,0.00008662407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15600874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44309565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015471951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001755436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572287427","doi":"","title":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Legal liability; Public law; Law; Government (linguistics); Tort; Strict liability; Political science","score_opus":0.02775398419859881,"score_gpt":0.26745899328560774,"score_spread":0.23970500908700892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W572287427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040057287,0.0018302745,0.0042015105,0.022103047,0.0001988502,0.0005685937,0.00007891032,0.00010919334,0.97050905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0585945,0.002441524,0.001497122,0.00004056351,0.0000585587,0.00005302712,0.00008661797,0.000026565282,0.9372015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939662,0.004039044,0.00050367345,0.0004405327,0.0006664654,0.00038404763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904126,0.004366707,0.0005596902,0.0018314896,0.0026669097,0.00016262454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011071725,0.00019059182,0.00027510457,0.000066244625,0.0014046504,0.00042990522,0.0019255248,0.00027747176,0.0001773055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030949696,0.0001663736,0.00021693393,0.00030167485,0.0014216154,0.0001817352,0.0004494246,0.00043883533,0.000109964254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010134347,0.00006509104,0.00015687433,0.000033998702,0.000018832776,1.0758861e-7,0.006160543,5.378858e-7,0.000016578362,0.95329773,0.0059749745,0.03427369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006623554,1.7452416e-7,0.0002805103,0.00024999827,0.000016643953,2.769083e-7,0.0005306455,0.000113431575,0.00034356536,0.034497358,0.96373177,0.00016939534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024882418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013577903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9577568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002472848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020270934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W576349480","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264682.001.0001","title":"Childbirth and the Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obstetrics; Childbirth; Medicine; Damages; Liability; Autonomy; Duty of care; Law; Nursing; Psychology; Political science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.01538602908609544,"score_gpt":0.22132244199041992,"score_spread":0.2059364129043245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W576349480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033980174,0.00008399978,0.000011126498,0.0003903804,0.000032162843,0.000428297,0.000064455824,0.00006653042,0.9988891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013797217,0.00094763737,0.00002602309,0.00023007124,0.00017897492,0.0000014010797,0.000009543016,0.000009867402,0.99721676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927485,0.00008967011,0.00007037865,0.00020391676,0.00018484295,0.00017631442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994611,0.00010093469,0.0000752644,0.00024400129,0.00002814666,0.00009054453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015221172,0.000115349234,0.00015925997,0.00002091643,0.0012281035,0.000090785776,0.00045676925,0.00017526407,0.00004408633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027669107,0.00009666119,0.00008904573,0.000009260078,0.0014326303,0.000057980687,0.00014912474,0.00027246724,0.0000017138492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029932211,0.0000031421978,3.72531e-7,0.0000050899735,0.00002400531,0.0000028494155,0.0020502345,7.675472e-7,3.4741404e-8,0.99048185,0.005730168,0.0016715283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041661103,0.000004344632,0.0000031644952,0.000016557096,0.00006829661,5.5717464e-7,0.00017036335,0.0000040932314,5.212849e-7,0.006984036,0.99221045,0.000120985715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002440632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010332704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081719314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018832376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9445703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W588156145","doi":"","title":"Agriculture and fisheries","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LexisNexis eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Index (typography); Law; Statement (logic); Table of contents; Common law; Geography; Operations research; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.031167857532641167,"score_gpt":0.264406059593497,"score_spread":0.23323820206085583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W588156145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011397759,0.00043333304,0.00000786741,0.0011721306,0.000121491816,0.00035959648,0.00004747413,0.00016034117,0.9975838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012316485,0.00044327928,0.00020651422,0.0005071484,0.0010936374,0.00005236448,0.000033518205,0.000025675421,0.9964062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887776,0.000037603622,0.00018191089,0.00032066036,0.0003103813,0.00027165032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934673,0.00006294733,0.00012430339,0.00022631804,0.000076854034,0.00016283519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009462931,0.00020557558,0.00024193834,0.000036793477,0.0009182796,0.00013386406,0.0002676729,0.00044364508,0.00008363277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020673939,0.00017824145,0.000098955345,0.000025018713,0.0007025838,0.00006058021,0.00009911288,0.00036743484,0.000099640034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019883735,0.0000054383013,0.000013881032,0.000016947879,0.000020534213,0.000008734182,0.006147829,5.6924215e-8,0.0000070473857,0.699741,0.28955257,0.0044839554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006381508,0.000012475463,0.000054173375,0.00003218219,0.000019259374,0.0000046705254,0.00020114127,2.1426234e-7,0.000009379587,0.02738748,0.9719776,0.00023761758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008453797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026266302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.682425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001189978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043604776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7268475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W589137434","doi":"","title":"The Question for the Description of the Law, by Reider Edvinsson","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02927165365649092,"score_gpt":0.3186001657831845,"score_spread":0.2893285121266936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W589137434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08318076,0.0006447064,0.024391182,0.51269287,0.0007923978,0.0044325828,0.000021073281,0.000108677676,0.37373576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812977,0.00009119521,0.000113707894,0.00047214408,0.00011308094,0.00017516121,6.7500406e-7,0.000002547323,0.017733837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995861,0.000057917947,0.000084163315,0.000054012962,0.00012246061,0.000095365904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994829,0.00020311917,0.000050726394,0.00015767057,0.00009015099,0.000015374662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045542457,0.000027123107,0.000025698433,0.0000017529904,0.0012083444,0.00010046302,0.00024384704,0.00002719556,0.000050597948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008752564,0.000010501878,0.000039831044,0.0000701861,0.00021875968,0.00010989593,0.000023102795,0.000039025497,0.000016439153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.2520036e-7,0.000005094418,0.00010318039,6.0267837e-7,0.0000023382024,3.116953e-10,0.00047429674,0.000002435737,0.00082191225,0.95771134,0.037769925,0.003108261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003966539,0.0000054852326,0.0028783453,0.0000025402442,0.0000070239594,3.0072254e-8,0.002254642,0.00045808783,0.0007446614,0.041597594,0.95198625,0.000025679157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030029332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012182941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91611373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024213286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024622868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97642976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W595083468","doi":"","title":"A Neu Neumeier: The Need for a More Flexible Framework for Choice of Law in the State of New York","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Law; Tort; Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Conflict of laws; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Substantive law; Sociology","score_opus":0.12382670485044123,"score_gpt":0.41453086304578335,"score_spread":0.2907041581953421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W595083468","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018770764,0.5222033,0.012466169,0.3135616,0.0007848413,0.029976912,0.00045735986,0.00013707335,0.10164195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567192,0.013399551,0.006089063,0.020589806,0.0006523799,0.0013832799,0.000013981259,0.000030257395,0.0011224378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990198,0.00010356651,0.00032764312,0.000102815284,0.00017665657,0.00026949323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998234,0.0010830815,0.0002106422,0.0003540515,0.000059013597,0.0000592493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013054585,0.00008064569,0.00024881068,0.0000072054872,0.00022689697,0.000021384909,0.00051642396,0.000041339546,0.00002150221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000258675,0.000045745364,0.00016826988,0.00034742118,0.00022826377,0.00011427991,0.000030062005,0.00010116096,0.0000044308367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033414901,0.000041126,0.000051885498,0.00035207928,0.000008992486,7.386256e-9,0.003503367,0.000002386486,0.0000058408596,0.98836917,0.002526797,0.0051350202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009564099,0.000017613218,0.00017549396,0.00045681154,0.000057619112,1.1956895e-7,0.00018565264,0.0000056203585,0.000035134955,0.0421319,0.95678324,0.000055138236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014824453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038243656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014767872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008110738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99173594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W609729940","doi":"","title":"The Fiduciary Contract and the Administration of the Goods of Another Person in the New Civil Code. A Comparative Outlook","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Fiduciary; Civil code; Order (exchange); Legislation; Romanian; Administration (probate law); Code (set theory); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Legal certainty; Business; Economics; Duty; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.05235807959325799,"score_gpt":0.35292759156295694,"score_spread":0.30056951196969894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W609729940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7526956,0.005776678,0.00019155747,0.09551659,0.00019927147,0.0015596404,0.000030851894,0.000011930519,0.14401785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984489,0.0002976185,0.000021024127,0.00048490643,0.00023732931,0.000031709133,2.717762e-7,0.0000039053602,0.00047429834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850625,0.0006474302,0.00022404532,0.00008372205,0.0003330736,0.0002054812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827933,0.0011489403,0.0002691098,0.00021518825,0.000052377258,0.0000350569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026219005,0.00007748076,0.00015313279,0.000010725689,0.0007041287,0.000051605402,0.00041868925,0.00004050513,0.000013218733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017272084,0.00003213718,0.00007698504,0.0002336453,0.00067468296,0.00009557238,0.000038950984,0.0002114496,0.0000017826595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031905752,0.0002792759,0.02350639,0.000013649678,0.00013469798,4.453817e-7,0.4390272,0.000012904286,0.00045913405,0.5195939,0.014440629,0.0022126955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013573532,0.000069234426,0.60439223,0.000050820603,0.0001514572,0.0000063668344,0.084109925,0.000118782664,0.0007138536,0.0026831052,0.30621415,0.0001327098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025515216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01588025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5808858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034259065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033722076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88615525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610974288","doi":"","title":"Restitution at the crossroads : a comparative study","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Mistake; German; Law; English law; Political science; Position (finance); Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11326347407508004,"score_gpt":0.41395007143190476,"score_spread":0.30068659735682474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W610974288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014306023,0.000082628234,0.000055229128,0.0016797672,0.00010213361,0.0011483104,0.000013674197,0.000073081355,0.99541456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05534993,0.000046772868,0.000010888449,0.0001261064,0.00044532586,0.00009218858,0.00001936097,0.0000055857076,0.94390386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989591,0.00010089846,0.00015910731,0.00022841129,0.00037660007,0.00017585016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993179,0.00012705248,0.000100129844,0.0003033927,0.00009146437,0.000060058122],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041771517,0.00011208774,0.00014906577,0.00001924034,0.001974294,0.00014097647,0.00035928015,0.000109398134,0.0015999213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017081104,0.00007084754,0.00006643053,0.00011001127,0.0005885146,0.000058834772,0.00013362391,0.00021273365,0.0011857342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005483778,0.00008536512,0.00016255074,0.0000011734367,0.000028347877,0.000002209449,0.01623416,0.000014998289,6.4663885e-7,0.58956194,0.3935874,0.00031571294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008169246,0.000022163835,0.00042465804,0.000005152391,0.00002683867,3.4820374e-7,0.0034867073,0.0000036416745,6.5255506e-7,0.004730816,0.9911159,0.00010137163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045318743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10989142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5975286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050656346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006083298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W612390946","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199249411.001.0001","title":"Atiyah’s Introduction To The Law Of Contract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":371,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Exposition (narrative); Context (archaeology); Comparative law; Legislation; Exclusion clause; Commercial law; Private law; Political science; Sociology; Contract management; Economics; Management; History","score_opus":0.01609054020179672,"score_gpt":0.29241599809850677,"score_spread":0.27632545789671004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W612390946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011112922,0.000028838282,0.00027695397,0.03893472,0.00016204402,0.00038712053,0.000024109433,0.000028700948,0.9601464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012352329,0.000009829269,0.000141694,0.0005415138,0.004081812,0.000021226142,0.000024833804,0.0000071302316,0.9828196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993369,0.000028041337,0.00015846992,0.00013769807,0.00023174733,0.0001071644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994905,0.0000501573,0.00009258515,0.00022971553,0.000101747435,0.000035283618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030957366,0.00006325985,0.000110637295,0.000015954929,0.0002602845,0.00003684504,0.00024533572,0.00009857071,0.00052526564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002368635,0.000042404165,0.00006160118,0.000063724205,0.0001618412,0.00003935986,0.000029059764,0.0001125525,0.00019292683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.21964e-7,0.0000052483097,7.0341247e-7,0.000001348842,0.0000032431237,2.3367397e-8,0.00023126484,0.000008780366,0.0000034165002,0.59118444,0.408009,0.0005519927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019876612,0.000006407936,0.00003511502,0.0000037298862,0.00001300001,7.319402e-8,0.00005886622,0.0000014426464,0.000013685113,0.0095886635,0.99020404,0.000055080036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017109795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048687804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58219504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009534024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019883455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W61433422","doi":"","title":"Making restitution work : the challenge of building sustainable governance and institutional structures in public administration","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Treaty; Economic growth; Negotiation; Land administration; Political science; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04036931427730173,"score_gpt":0.27198694951945096,"score_spread":0.23161763524214923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W61433422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.951028,0.000582501,0.0035691385,0.0055252598,0.0002819633,0.000338069,0.0000093125645,0.0000281105,0.03863764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978301,0.0002532188,0.0012651064,0.000005875076,0.00014166615,0.0000016140456,0.00000280414,0.0000021357027,0.0004975104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899364,0.000083845356,0.00014158303,0.00019449851,0.0004182593,0.0001681614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930775,0.00008317405,0.00020392245,0.00014448704,0.00020741991,0.0000532392],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000324744,0.00007409794,0.00011454943,0.00005389971,0.0019843688,0.000023711325,0.0002523316,0.000101465535,0.000013035918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018638592,0.00007845889,0.000044415876,0.00039012564,0.0015371337,0.0006715311,0.000088562854,0.000158095,4.4051183e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004452319,0.000041821677,0.008724481,0.000021502181,0.000010316603,0.00003317374,0.0028109574,0.0008974561,0.00013630111,0.9870313,0.000055821933,0.00019235931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012268831,0.00012504909,0.59914047,0.00035292972,0.000055953733,0.000072179995,0.01413081,0.000751165,0.00032692592,0.026654167,0.35666654,0.00049691886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016767109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091019797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9603771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035807738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013273432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W620351764","doi":"","title":"The Law of Vendor and Purchaser: The Law and Practice Relating to Contracts for Sale of Land in the Common Law Provinces of Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Vendor; Business; Common law; Political science","score_opus":0.015108058075966928,"score_gpt":0.3120203938709943,"score_spread":0.29691233579502735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W620351764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06266912,0.0053963466,0.000018231136,0.11363465,0.0001866336,0.0018831148,0.00013327118,0.0000070355923,0.81607157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908603,0.0005688953,0.00004283881,0.0041867574,0.00008123239,0.00007245271,0.0000100915995,0.0000057868765,0.0041716737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986553,0.00047132678,0.00031896005,0.00014448677,0.00021559132,0.00019433683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903612,0.009159568,0.00023296737,0.0001298473,0.0000493195,0.00006707359],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021301624,0.00007955704,0.00028736558,0.0000116247,0.00039100717,0.000008937763,0.00026153232,0.00024630365,0.0000125369015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006543435,0.00004260799,0.000019736228,0.00003985647,0.0030503466,0.000029932353,0.00006779385,0.00030530305,1.03464664e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010367775,0.000024501933,0.00016032741,0.000028891032,0.00002410708,0.000006136631,0.003030792,6.735532e-7,0.0000021968185,0.9945902,0.00042014604,0.0016083302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005881867,0.00025686342,0.000440852,0.000060052236,0.00008610813,0.000053294167,0.0019853192,0.000019971998,0.0000111640375,0.08933595,0.9070824,0.00007988844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55365676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9521201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9281911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019059244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005665875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W621524309","doi":"","title":"Just cause : the law of summary dismissal in Canada","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Canada Law Book","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01880153347540609,"score_gpt":0.24572081091206865,"score_spread":0.22691927743666257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W621524309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008073002,0.001274542,1.7144765e-7,0.004530803,0.00018340547,0.00038211673,0.0004786109,0.000008762598,0.9930609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045218788,0.0002677372,0.0000027705755,0.007561741,0.0002958436,0.000038349528,0.000074497126,0.000027956063,0.94651234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983601,0.00007087442,0.00032698855,0.00023553785,0.00063969416,0.00036683073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990064,0.00020479824,0.00013510426,0.000415453,0.00005049261,0.0001877553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014664784,0.00017316728,0.0002718584,0.000012491348,0.00043709393,0.000028695327,0.000661029,0.00011826986,0.0008690834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000083231125,0.00014676125,0.000050750456,0.00007840607,0.00045141304,0.00006250666,0.000054217948,0.000376133,0.0000043804716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016492978,0.0000027633585,0.0000081855105,0.00001074975,0.000011236975,0.000022308626,0.00017436946,0.00001586346,1.775093e-7,0.53221047,0.46744183,0.000100394966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006599258,0.0000024628505,0.00003625733,0.000054711614,0.000025650477,5.0652227e-7,0.00030102694,0.0000026233674,0.0000040161412,0.001410619,0.9979237,0.0001724902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99998707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53079987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035397457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051719576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9536563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W623075741","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198804710.001.0001","title":"The Principles of Equity &amp; Trusts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Equity (law); Doctrine; Constructive trust; Law; Settlor; Common law; Duty; Political science; Context (archaeology); Testamentary trust; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.08612043444867738,"score_gpt":0.3118128033362594,"score_spread":0.22569236888758198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W623075741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015125728,0.00004519889,0.00013739213,0.00011054671,0.00014495154,0.0004404389,0.00012555406,0.0000675023,0.99877715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007445835,0.00043581758,0.00018060136,0.000016140308,0.00028874702,0.0000016831607,0.000015314403,0.000014130549,0.998303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986931,0.00011497691,0.00017956147,0.0002595444,0.0004400836,0.0003127163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984913,0.00024030934,0.00034134227,0.0005669016,0.0002310426,0.00012910375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051198923,0.0001538557,0.00020847931,0.00004207354,0.0013999606,0.000074775104,0.0013503005,0.00028515156,0.000036376965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051847193,0.00013594878,0.00017468259,0.000022975493,0.0013906419,0.00006509964,0.0008390236,0.00025969322,0.0000037301459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021106176,0.000009344336,0.000004385222,0.00002051228,0.000044501012,0.0000010423033,0.0012553566,0.0000010611309,0.000002773902,0.97741646,0.018215995,0.003007483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011086068,0.0000134103,0.000018439332,0.00003987568,0.000069763344,1.9208298e-7,0.00018903219,0.0000032831167,0.000017299988,0.002895537,0.99649227,0.0001500484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007736081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004990293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97827625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030487933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008976069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W623254374","doi":"10.4324/9781843144687","title":"Undue Influence and the Family Home","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Undue influence; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021722077494312587,"score_gpt":0.26871614434351454,"score_spread":0.24699406684920194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W623254374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021014627,0.0008091795,0.000021870746,0.0042412127,0.00003786019,0.00027968897,0.000008331386,0.000047568938,0.9943441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009361283,0.001872986,0.000043297587,0.0012422368,0.0002280308,0.000024433204,0.0000019805923,0.000007115318,0.9872186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937636,0.000035937737,0.00010685181,0.00014689406,0.00020399189,0.00012995322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994686,0.00019362393,0.000056041434,0.00018096564,0.000042785072,0.0000579413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025619596,0.00007907371,0.000118392476,0.000015964542,0.00048528367,0.00013050876,0.0002866796,0.00013126136,0.00022427959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027143786,0.000048545928,0.000042602696,0.00005332451,0.0008080321,0.00006264973,0.00007257772,0.00018243275,0.0002820318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.270823e-7,0.0000020255834,0.0000054400693,0.0000023857801,0.000004982519,2.6088526e-7,0.0009501635,7.59218e-7,3.3398743e-7,0.94617665,0.0517577,0.0010986681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009853453,0.0000019664953,0.00020581589,0.000008090899,0.000011506273,1.8346381e-7,0.00016753559,0.0000064161813,7.040057e-8,0.0627468,0.9366755,0.00007759887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027054262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010320692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8849178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005112066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017452106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4089813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629189181","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879","title":"Re-imagining the Trust","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Trust law; Institution; Blind trust; China; Convention; Express trust; Political science; Law; Voting trust; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.040123497448403114,"score_gpt":0.25787692064704865,"score_spread":0.21775342319864555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W629189181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021578286,0.00015244009,0.00012658173,0.00049657014,0.00024072325,0.00041267244,0.000114316004,0.00013311437,0.998302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065884735,0.000080319725,0.000036194335,0.00014748362,0.0008705943,0.000002150476,0.000024152809,0.000021085656,0.9922295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988255,0.00012643289,0.000109610315,0.0002551236,0.00031499733,0.0003683351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989193,0.00014825889,0.00016609402,0.0004830701,0.00010425381,0.00017900323],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033569615,0.0001704941,0.00017718303,0.00004661635,0.001323476,0.00010472123,0.00095622457,0.00023004095,0.000016774078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020542098,0.00015817805,0.00015512011,0.000020932617,0.0006692659,0.00012053119,0.00032311844,0.0005044524,0.000060281167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043172745,0.0000050700505,0.0000031364648,0.000008857132,0.000026115282,0.0000057240673,0.0023395987,3.8654295e-7,0.0000012260857,0.83493936,0.1619002,0.000766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010301612,0.0000028663633,0.000017614464,0.00002585697,0.00012496107,4.6502066e-7,0.0019499916,0.0000065395016,0.000007244373,0.000015595582,0.99754643,0.0001994097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033265175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012223054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8356462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038127636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052715786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629226840","doi":"","title":"The Conditions of Civil Liability within the New Civil Code","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal liability; Legislator; Liability; Civil code; Legislation; Obligation; Law; Business; Debtor; Political science; Strict liability; Creditor; Duty; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.029316945606806675,"score_gpt":0.34341895075462553,"score_spread":0.31410200514781883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W629226840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28875715,0.0032460203,0.0015090952,0.11589334,0.0012166253,0.0013355303,0.00013197998,0.00015244761,0.5877578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952105,0.00025360152,0.00009191947,0.00040799967,0.0009446008,0.000047332982,0.000001268214,0.000008508388,0.0030342194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843144,0.0003100096,0.0003083555,0.00012648386,0.0004312716,0.0003924288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813557,0.00089004065,0.00023686793,0.00039269816,0.00014071146,0.00020408534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028956276,0.0000931464,0.00012999844,0.000015592565,0.0022104105,0.00007644021,0.0005670318,0.000056512712,0.00012208332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006603509,0.00005483115,0.000109380315,0.00038112875,0.00064422947,0.00014924721,0.00011379625,0.00027351896,0.000055427434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000960811,0.0001370625,0.012808063,0.000006977088,0.0000706214,2.4309267e-7,0.022744758,0.00003746887,0.00024141534,0.8717662,0.09161038,0.00056719565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014580348,0.000015956888,0.04972776,0.000011362384,0.00006780135,0.000001561725,0.0061543467,0.000018701314,0.000192066,0.0172145,0.926357,0.000093139824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025426433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03179465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85455173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011054352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068043487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W630523282","doi":"10.5040/9781472560292","title":"Justifying Private Law Remedies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Law; Private law; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Theme (computing); Punishment (psychology); Conflict of laws; Unjust enrichment; Common law; Comparative law; Psychology","score_opus":0.07381252395668485,"score_gpt":0.3005734188868517,"score_spread":0.22676089493016682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W630523282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000035158388,0.00017480117,0.000048367147,0.0029216735,0.0006249674,0.00042915434,0.000051374456,0.0004835771,0.9952309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003219705,0.00010624509,0.00067305326,0.0016586437,0.0032235906,0.000079368336,0.00011103436,0.00006529709,0.9908631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975765,0.00008519838,0.0003880699,0.0004973356,0.00088220346,0.0005706978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984472,0.00020269268,0.0003023252,0.00053173694,0.0002442984,0.00027176773],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008392175,0.00026485405,0.00033388796,0.00011192994,0.0021529975,0.0024022502,0.0010763857,0.0005727835,0.0001179992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035866894,0.00027155373,0.00018648342,0.0000617138,0.000806527,0.0010183695,0.00032506464,0.0010091534,0.00022816157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011290588,0.000004766656,0.0000023773548,0.000022155142,0.000016819444,0.000007957772,0.0033048014,3.6948356e-7,0.0000104571045,0.70427424,0.2908187,0.0015362666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090790796,0.0000055418122,0.0000065088448,0.0001344325,0.000030135572,0.00000245582,0.00015125924,0.0000020224552,0.000022739201,0.025991712,0.97325176,0.00031065088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019005631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040232716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68243307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000408674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011394841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W631272203","doi":"","title":"The law of civil procedure in Ontario","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LexisNexis Canada eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Civil procedure; Commercial law","score_opus":0.01677178108273663,"score_gpt":0.23597718076453683,"score_spread":0.2192053996818002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W631272203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016342128,0.000087443404,0.0000015168794,0.0012146648,0.00019498113,0.00048401693,0.000022983508,0.000016443357,0.99781454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12745583,0.0000037509492,0.000011631666,0.0007084947,0.0001861275,0.00006277109,0.000011396433,0.000021357766,0.87153864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832696,0.000059928538,0.0003694684,0.00025574834,0.0006150563,0.00037286038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891686,0.00019994067,0.0002584136,0.00040459033,0.00009563488,0.00012456231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038465194,0.00017733916,0.00027868536,0.000026726419,0.0005740514,0.000057949706,0.0006844249,0.00022643455,0.0000875415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026651156,0.0001431085,0.00007929837,0.000031635733,0.0004798703,0.000021926044,0.00007626617,0.0005647301,0.0000050303915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003109888,0.0000033884553,0.000058831673,0.00001836934,0.0000133045805,0.0000025315665,0.001821558,0.000002311574,9.544287e-7,0.9282033,0.06949447,0.0003779049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000781442,0.000008889605,0.00013415852,0.00007051984,0.000011524422,3.3999396e-7,0.00019922513,8.874544e-7,0.000007485302,0.04111392,0.9582153,0.00015962347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017829868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020989234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98456085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W633328610","doi":"","title":"Die fiducie von Québec und der trust : ein Vergleich mit verschiedenen Modellen fiduziarischer Rechtsfiguren im civil law","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Commercial law","score_opus":0.03822276679091881,"score_gpt":0.31234506665515666,"score_spread":0.27412229986423786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W633328610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039468604,0.009750308,0.0015916195,0.0066845394,0.00085428264,0.001381559,0.00021029176,0.00029655948,0.9788362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04488961,0.0020101469,0.0009899024,0.0019907448,0.0031435243,0.00012574681,0.0003679384,0.00018557074,0.9462968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935809,0.00027637824,0.001221004,0.0017085637,0.001637011,0.0015761568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598664,0.0006898308,0.0005984263,0.0015051157,0.00042710555,0.00079287204],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014819112,0.0010362392,0.001042392,0.00021741241,0.0026000796,0.00059364154,0.002112163,0.0020585393,0.01171553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008675133,0.0009807767,0.00075770676,0.0005343327,0.0015037687,0.00050960813,0.00061504,0.0017937975,0.009008123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011060957,0.00040716832,0.00016246417,0.00010739688,0.0011710803,0.000034226374,0.005571629,0.00033255963,0.00002531694,0.79459953,0.1929411,0.0045369305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006504028,0.00008262566,0.00006690019,0.00013118314,0.0009996243,9.56245e-7,0.0006027684,0.0005728331,0.00008496201,0.0071156383,0.9883963,0.0012958176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3599394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67589295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7954552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017006523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004131593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W641196625","doi":"","title":"Exploring contract law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Estoppel; Doctrine; Damages; Mistake; Supreme court; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Common law; Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Restitution","score_opus":0.18648716007213711,"score_gpt":0.3375740673275916,"score_spread":0.15108690725545448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W641196625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007829804,0.00006407483,0.000034725606,0.001653134,0.00007397054,0.00018966266,0.0000044594385,0.00014745475,0.99782467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006934315,0.00037492922,0.00014750905,0.0009503972,0.0010411231,0.000026320315,0.000011596517,0.0000098482415,0.99050397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930924,0.000015468753,0.00011893138,0.00015571575,0.0002202723,0.00018035361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995822,0.000069066664,0.00005249149,0.00015978594,0.00004181074,0.000094684474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017129509,0.00008538632,0.00012486344,0.00001739881,0.0003818679,0.00009380906,0.00022358263,0.00011105534,0.0007788104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011423009,0.00007970253,0.000078741235,0.0000313595,0.000108292545,0.00018454262,0.00001862591,0.00017926912,0.0006536387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.216578e-7,0.000006591753,2.153281e-7,0.0000012827921,0.0000040073105,0.0000013129169,0.00052832573,3.7153922e-7,6.5510415e-7,0.9714315,0.02112527,0.006900162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002931152,0.0000044984404,0.000009460369,0.000011508004,0.00000856202,1.2297367e-7,0.000044685225,6.354318e-7,0.000003780332,0.03661798,0.9631616,0.00010784052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025140736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004731716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94203633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014111253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002338606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8527428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67047942","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1380","title":"The Vulnerability of Indigenous Land Rights in Australia and Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Supreme court; Indigenous rights; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Extinguishment; Politics; High Court; Sociology; Constitution","score_opus":0.020673356737914074,"score_gpt":0.29959797818505224,"score_spread":0.27892462144713814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67047942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94801736,0.000052303392,0.000011109092,0.002075304,0.00007287274,0.00009347711,0.0000066437883,0.0000027119675,0.049668215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996408,0.00002758021,0.00008814212,0.000029458643,0.000073978415,0.0000021766866,2.977826e-7,0.0000014794301,0.00013606666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932706,0.000067314475,0.00016442258,0.00006415434,0.00019734884,0.00017971666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964905,0.00006149121,0.000074074596,0.00007564717,0.00004442032,0.000095332376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005447074,0.000040882755,0.00007032692,0.000007571602,0.0011466665,0.00006531489,0.00015600672,0.000031843098,0.000017557551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019986426,0.000026794545,0.000017042328,0.000057992056,0.00018297155,0.00007186116,0.000014771452,0.00019058735,8.6145883e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004103781,0.000025974156,0.018743264,0.0000019795148,0.000005462275,0.000006493375,0.0014349038,0.000112776135,0.000013254806,0.9794499,0.000032612443,0.00016927371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071746286,0.0000378504,0.11630465,0.000030416033,0.00001230645,0.000030374013,0.0008594485,0.0000023762027,0.00028059044,0.7376522,0.1439192,0.00015311845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24179769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016366265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003495787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88193476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6885996242","doi":"10.14288/1.0370597","title":"A Bill to Amend the Law relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency in Vancouver Island and its Dependencies. Whereas, doubts have been entertained as to the application of the English Bankruptcy and Insolvent Laws to this Colony. And whereas it is expedient to amend the Laws relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency, and to declare the same Laws so amended to be applicable to this Colony...","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Common law; English law","score_opus":0.026849894716966152,"score_gpt":0.30631684202093307,"score_spread":0.27946694730396693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6885996242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67377615,0.00039013696,0.0012202132,0.16019918,0.00036082033,0.028607573,0.00078218733,0.00009240765,0.13457134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291451,0.00011806843,0.0022019153,0.02798003,0.0003071141,0.0064790617,0.000005798455,0.000072105046,0.03369082],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958606,0.0004261507,0.0008144146,0.001319047,0.00073303987,0.0008467752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964975,0.00088870997,0.00023819014,0.0009588572,0.0004999415,0.00091679563],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021216008,0.0005010868,0.00059386814,0.00019996346,0.0070138415,0.0019019054,0.001135104,0.00021255326,0.00013429084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009168021,0.00030782548,0.00006457599,0.0027756623,0.00030970358,0.0004043717,0.0026573325,0.00046919758,0.00002120441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066505885,0.00030015217,0.0029823845,0.000048193633,0.00015679684,0.000002495928,0.5638717,0.00058480504,0.0026505,0.013159964,0.4086707,0.0069073034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007443115,0.00092497136,0.0018068424,0.00021205722,0.00009917412,0.000009365958,0.048147097,0.0001697822,0.00032299486,0.0012048311,0.94583064,0.00052793213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20102893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81578356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6147546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040779996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027812907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886052780","doi":"10.14288/1.0357701","title":"Minutes of meeting of the Board Trustees of the Winfield &amp; Okanagan Centre Irrigation District, March 18, 1932","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irrigation; On board; Annual report","score_opus":0.04929864801979789,"score_gpt":0.32580887682566106,"score_spread":0.2765102288058632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886052780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039332367,0.000012436982,0.00002213071,0.009495242,0.0002071298,0.0007160202,0.00009049987,0.0000053744034,0.9501188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8607311,0.000009896391,0.00017974494,0.000013640968,0.000049996015,0.000019517307,0.0000011057072,0.0000033126294,0.13899165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927324,0.000099729,0.00020764783,0.000101552665,0.00021553726,0.000102272876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878454,0.00015634397,0.00038191924,0.0004902293,0.00016063638,0.000026325508],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029367403,0.000047373534,0.000108283566,0.000013709324,0.0048019695,0.00028427874,0.0010596466,0.00003969035,0.0002532451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043833736,0.000031503543,0.000097791424,0.00032687874,0.0004388687,0.0001304394,0.00031680433,0.00007961357,9.981253e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057846828,0.00075810484,0.07441948,0.000121363555,0.00025346706,1.5998877e-7,0.035557505,0.0004853443,0.0043756794,0.2881536,0.59023196,0.0055855145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003852646,0.000019500001,0.050476734,0.00015677082,0.00010540006,3.595462e-7,0.008646423,0.000095109506,0.006757105,0.010697072,0.9225166,0.00014364655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13027334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16675341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8213988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034645192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022537519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99649364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6886066233","doi":"10.14288/1.0370694","title":"A Bill to Amend the Law Relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency in Vancouver Island and its Dependencies. Whereas, doubts have been entertained as to the application of the English Bankrupt and Insolvent Laws to this Colony. And whereas it is expedient to amend the Laws relating to Bankruptcy and Insolvency, and to declare the same Laws so amended to be applicable to this Colony.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Bankruptcy; Legislation; English law","score_opus":0.026638186143584847,"score_gpt":0.3060024910932688,"score_spread":0.279364304949684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6886066233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68777317,0.0003582612,0.0011010017,0.15961146,0.00033705548,0.027604178,0.00073663186,0.00008545367,0.1223928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93205625,0.000104000894,0.0020354027,0.027246695,0.00027875905,0.006206786,0.0000050803487,0.00006545787,0.032001562],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610364,0.00039629897,0.0007637194,0.0012467803,0.0006924605,0.0007970957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966912,0.0008456983,0.00021904634,0.0009047001,0.00046888262,0.0008704425],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020278834,0.00046948786,0.0005581139,0.00018607172,0.0067235436,0.0018074452,0.0010720063,0.000199247,0.00012330161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086449843,0.00028655896,0.00005927205,0.0026425456,0.00029022328,0.00037359764,0.0025342274,0.00043965338,0.000019119456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059218134,0.0002713089,0.0032298758,0.000043711614,0.00014470884,0.0000022171519,0.5660107,0.00053618755,0.0024582525,0.012715918,0.40809467,0.0059002386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006847902,0.0008777219,0.0018920155,0.00019615897,0.00009097672,0.000008563489,0.04680587,0.00016798954,0.0003134065,0.00096401386,0.94750893,0.0004895534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19540972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82332695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62791723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038087758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025673557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904004996","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.22061.49129","title":"Costs in Family Law Proceedings in Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.033615073373160324,"score_gpt":0.29358726984127603,"score_spread":0.2599721964681157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904004996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47609326,0.0000015816123,0.0000052851647,0.0027116027,0.000010577094,0.000079337326,2.3888495e-7,0.000012441948,0.5210857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98265404,0.0000057171387,0.00012382855,0.00040039737,0.000019083194,0.000023878902,1.1045626e-7,0.0000018471885,0.016771117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958473,0.000004846507,0.00008061465,0.000096508134,0.00009070158,0.00014262275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99987507,0.000022915983,0.000012713285,0.00003294783,0.000019155847,0.000037173406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019908295,0.000028263406,0.0000427197,0.000020141826,0.00005703226,0.000025785106,0.000107527994,0.00003333817,0.0001900824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014323852,0.000018933988,0.000010189725,0.000115442315,0.00006481906,0.00017034766,0.000021176827,0.000046604935,0.00010512304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001117067,0.000017963992,0.08898183,2.366893e-7,2.4685107e-7,2.3546777e-7,0.0020305582,2.9332476e-8,0.00048914657,0.9071926,0.00032680784,0.0009592624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020335404,0.0000053464423,0.26005167,0.000016168175,4.014567e-7,4.341718e-8,0.0012440739,9.314612e-7,0.000093888506,0.008420949,0.72990143,0.000061760664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80101067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89877164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040429164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010689726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2081269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6904868849","doi":"10.14288/1.0354634","title":"Letter from The Westminster Trust and Safe Deposit Company to [James] Goldie, September 1909","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.03947823413792121,"score_gpt":0.32668086067759394,"score_spread":0.2872026265396727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6904868849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02104724,0.00001821904,0.00013718627,0.041799612,0.00022276762,0.0007683365,0.00007103244,0.00001961753,0.935916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45033064,0.00002037825,0.0010627189,0.006385104,0.0005535059,0.00024909334,0.000004051058,0.000011279891,0.5413832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992735,0.00006556424,0.00012183595,0.00022502066,0.0001305354,0.00018356118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999174,0.000116883406,0.00006550074,0.00047183235,0.00004848832,0.00012331999],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019395298,0.00007718224,0.00010787387,0.0000107394935,0.014644544,0.0047366587,0.00077350385,0.0000494578,0.0009992141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059774407,0.0000591721,0.00003693277,0.00017193367,0.00019034924,0.00030387807,0.00038723834,0.00011778912,0.0002380321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069044695,0.000030382107,0.0038329223,4.964849e-7,0.000021286422,7.330348e-7,0.00186874,0.000004113968,0.000033743378,0.002350326,0.991056,0.0007943219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017545199,0.000010192618,0.038265076,0.000010620409,0.000021091599,7.525578e-7,0.00056176755,0.000030460793,0.00003141081,0.00061936246,0.96017975,0.000094074036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23796241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2934884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4292834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056657194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007743016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6905002092","doi":"10.14288/1.0222176","title":"In the Supreme Court of Canada, On appeal from the Court of Appeal for British Columbia between Attorney-General of Canada and City of Vancouver (Plaintiffs) Appellants; and Alfred Gonzalves (Defendant) Respondent. Case on Appeal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; High Court; Remand (court procedure); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.020539383637839567,"score_gpt":0.2172447651374114,"score_spread":0.19670538149957184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6905002092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900691,0.00007655406,0.000017675768,0.00050173723,0.00009902325,0.0006585677,0.0071966364,0.000004814114,0.0013759003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991454,0.000035512814,0.0000662518,0.00005965092,0.000064217464,0.0000017910345,0.000030759027,0.000009305143,0.0005871247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981557,0.00022627035,0.0003185366,0.00032091863,0.00067759946,0.0003009533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984048,0.0004662487,0.0003810975,0.00027547716,0.00029979492,0.00017260866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093713024,0.00006586698,0.00044269266,0.000021961334,0.00045184756,0.000058582988,0.00048200166,0.000108784756,0.0000256039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012305236,0.00014553701,0.000074018986,0.00024113727,0.0007053282,0.00011012413,0.00011509333,0.0001562191,6.301291e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032682525,0.0005255086,0.51200545,0.00029115166,0.0003312395,0.00034655895,0.00980918,0.00008789066,0.00027344454,0.00029314015,0.4522052,0.023504363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015730986,0.00014615653,0.9720274,0.00016778566,0.000070268274,0.000015173631,0.018269556,0.00009454528,0.000008582516,0.00049481797,0.006971439,0.00016115847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99984163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46002194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019596494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013830061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59348273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6921961628","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1714.2000.tb00271.x/pdf","title":"At the interface of law and accounting: An examination of a trend toward a reduction in the scope of auditor liability to third parties in the common law countries","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Archive @ University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Common law; Audit; Scope (computer science); Statute; Strict liability","score_opus":0.020387658877029223,"score_gpt":0.2450095401032653,"score_spread":0.22462188122623608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6921961628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97427565,0.000021442847,0.00009699935,0.0007243844,0.0000380288,0.0004275783,0.00059896085,0.000009054189,0.023807922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972147,0.00003062159,0.000066828725,0.000015368823,0.000033745346,3.1703294e-7,0.000018009021,0.0000036050037,0.000110063505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986707,0.00024629815,0.00021222763,0.0002302651,0.0004632296,0.00017729274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898106,0.00026270232,0.00028234255,0.00031279327,0.000112798254,0.00004829557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007922069,0.00011457518,0.00028364104,0.00010076797,0.000423469,0.000028608607,0.0007394883,0.00006291987,0.000031967822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002667972,0.00009758396,0.000098024364,0.00042395695,0.0026306298,0.0006584141,0.00019383543,0.00015651374,0.000002758015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067851716,0.00017011722,0.008120283,0.00010756489,0.000033913166,0.0000015961305,0.9301951,0.00044363295,0.00018583715,0.058521673,0.000052287403,0.0014895098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089181436,0.00034125344,0.16545522,0.00015744836,0.000085882835,9.3543e-7,0.8187551,0.00012779023,0.00040056664,0.0025535007,0.011022297,0.00020818935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008397903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014727901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15733494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005855758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006542328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6944074724","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/urj6n","title":"The presumption of resulting trust and beneficiary designations: What’s intention go to do with it?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Science Framework","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Beneficiary; Doctrine; Estate; Settlor; Empirical evidence","score_opus":0.06899826628608988,"score_gpt":0.41350786885176916,"score_spread":0.3445096025656793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6944074724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82466894,0.00024761973,0.016578218,0.07794532,0.00057752134,0.0026471894,0.000010370653,0.000030580675,0.07729425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880385,0.00025275335,0.010691579,0.00013676139,0.00004980915,0.000062288265,3.7398672e-7,0.0000033169354,0.0007646473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989297,0.00004375996,0.0001509079,0.0002583671,0.000413306,0.00020396372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866074,0.00022465085,0.00020772396,0.000554015,0.00025356084,0.00009930746],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003142708,0.0000520724,0.000070763424,0.00003419242,0.0062131677,0.00482295,0.001946065,0.000043563647,0.000013018354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022057248,0.00003508151,0.000012659336,0.00033459353,0.0011222837,0.0022711297,0.0004859728,0.00010915185,0.000010976957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002821921,0.000028137489,0.007660349,0.0000023785212,0.0000037743575,1.9042157e-7,0.009862694,0.000070373266,0.0004045345,0.8242728,0.00015913132,0.15750739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049090816,0.00023407945,0.53468543,0.0019460329,0.000041926112,0.0000018719624,0.104205646,0.0019260328,0.0017829944,0.15712745,0.19698215,0.0005754659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016351962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022483685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6671454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048284317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020564892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99621016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968710746","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4606807","title":"i need the most strongest love spell, revenge/ death , cure to sickness and infertility, caster win court case etc +2348164900707","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Curse; MAGIC (telescope); Seclusion","score_opus":0.058349937068350184,"score_gpt":0.3089403079859198,"score_spread":0.25059037091756964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968710746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.329942,0.00024794645,0.0020967396,0.08694585,0.00014568465,0.0013048473,0.00051031896,0.00028711456,0.5785195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877675,0.000081647224,0.00015307343,0.00065417547,0.0003014782,3.3978683e-8,0.000116559044,0.0003053797,0.01062011],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836653,0.00042584425,0.00018467571,0.00034616987,0.00034094317,0.0003358579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986012,0.00006169348,0.00005641469,0.00042494238,0.00059218216,0.00026357727],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008078078,0.00010869851,0.00011366272,0.000052711035,0.0017922346,0.001090464,0.00051089184,0.000060024922,0.008822114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054809294,0.00009726545,0.00003097566,0.0006173625,0.00021719969,0.00021634885,0.0010236673,0.0002604309,0.0080226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010875573,0.0005104411,0.0003884523,0.00012164569,0.00013764604,0.00076762313,0.08461054,0.00023733935,0.004631371,0.18683083,0.6316864,0.08996895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017665728,0.00004019754,0.0011346041,0.000013606378,0.00001628056,0.00018885083,0.008466959,0.00007669248,0.000110785346,0.00022741323,0.9894267,0.00012129264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065129134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021591251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6578255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011853199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022617769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980107130","doi":"","title":"The Authorship of Certain Papers in <italic>The Lower Canada Jurist</italic>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Subject (documents); Exposition (narrative)","score_opus":0.023857529487475722,"score_gpt":0.2622308530890648,"score_spread":0.23837332360158908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980107130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14623037,0.0000017208881,0.0000051235206,0.007728331,0.00017942152,0.00042028638,0.00002767182,0.000021340797,0.84538573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99414915,0.004562943,0.000019352065,0.00008431848,0.000070878974,0.000004263832,0.0000019034973,0.00000814237,0.001099037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880993,0.00018630298,0.00013709225,0.00020720395,0.00031077344,0.00034867882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988067,0.00023041031,0.00019280548,0.0006174563,0.00007462489,0.00007801197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005167176,0.00010699383,0.00012247848,0.00040283974,0.0021237724,0.00013323879,0.0013475933,0.00007711625,0.000016238702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027138094,0.0000779626,0.000079684025,0.0014077503,0.0005169894,0.00018147555,0.0002017559,0.0002033158,0.0000031881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120180535,0.00023417959,0.01285679,0.000024420293,0.00009427982,0.000096875156,0.035034753,0.00002991307,0.00001665439,0.91290575,0.002084971,0.03650124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018253016,0.000015554057,0.004001201,0.000011631028,0.000015834046,2.794868e-7,0.004404905,0.00003181127,0.000019155423,0.000014165689,0.9911963,0.000106644584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99058765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99771386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003633754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019165772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980405334","doi":"","title":"Canada's Legal Inheritances","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Order (exchange); Payment","score_opus":0.018628872908477673,"score_gpt":0.2766016047200417,"score_spread":0.257972731811564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980405334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1673479,0.00037001638,0.0000559372,0.022614896,0.00033834082,0.0002042667,0.000024629611,0.000110914574,0.8089331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97160965,0.00010436762,0.0002528755,0.0026685311,0.0006386511,0.00003094421,0.00000423365,0.000008856856,0.024681859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890167,0.00005432329,0.00014887487,0.00019576919,0.00035654136,0.0003428336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937165,0.000046445388,0.000047472375,0.00020805994,0.00006437481,0.0002619911],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020624379,0.00008290964,0.00010159965,0.000010915918,0.0007996115,0.00016244999,0.00033777568,0.000053945292,0.00096469215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006472646,0.000081819664,0.00003840146,0.00025225,0.00014621079,0.00026853583,0.00003642125,0.00015491997,0.00018325011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004291503,0.00002122522,0.0029893487,0.0000019461395,0.0000066938987,0.000015236419,0.00013175649,0.000012012554,0.00006494839,0.9673075,0.028245648,0.0011993651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088332046,0.0000068246613,0.0025919597,0.0000056839312,0.0000040592595,0.0000014734975,0.00050422706,0.000006284631,0.000048827664,0.0019470465,0.9946762,0.00011909337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99751484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96643054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019884965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009935335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980825359","doi":"","title":"Criterios MEDLINE para la selección de revistas cientÃficas. MetodologÃa e indicadores: Aplicación a las revistas médicas españolas con especial atención a las de salud pública","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Electronic library online (Sciences Carlos III Health Institute)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Bibliometrics; China; Web of science","score_opus":0.037114230445837,"score_gpt":0.3642187530367662,"score_spread":0.3271045225909292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980825359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82016623,0.0126195485,0.0014572928,0.13240176,0.0029196935,0.0052685356,0.002047241,0.0014229636,0.021696743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616191,0.008866435,0.0061717057,0.005252624,0.004406421,0.00035361672,0.001301507,0.00015168822,0.011876903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98203075,0.0026636838,0.0029586267,0.0036155432,0.0030021898,0.005729231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99320275,0.0009209201,0.0019094553,0.0017063059,0.0003415022,0.0019190463],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010189958,0.0012550874,0.0017633453,0.0012350741,0.007968322,0.0045403284,0.004621688,0.00078563753,0.00067597185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007713006,0.0011868521,0.0007264782,0.010144323,0.010380468,0.0037098671,0.0009905213,0.0025389388,0.00020655736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028175217,0.0025577394,0.003945215,0.0007330426,0.00013197736,0.00011156651,0.0052380958,0.00043176865,0.001703784,0.900745,0.07472531,0.009394806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017015409,0.0007027173,0.0024273028,0.00062751985,0.00016024584,0.00015340773,0.0009538915,0.0029999064,0.0006178373,0.009807082,0.9785402,0.0013083607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061070803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058210683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002012172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034769755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981241806","doi":"","title":"Drought, Heavy Precipitation and Climate","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precipitation; Storm; Atmospheric research; Winter storm; Climate change; Research program","score_opus":0.007270854689161005,"score_gpt":0.2245598091914986,"score_spread":0.2172889545023376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981241806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000750859,0.00015255708,4.319157e-7,0.00074886554,0.00019791788,0.00046727195,0.00013589546,0.0001536043,0.9980684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001743385,0.0010281752,0.0013689152,0.00016179001,0.00027957096,0.000026144595,0.00008321107,0.000056339955,0.9952525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888426,0.00005966642,0.00034135813,0.00015382768,0.00031115796,0.00024972172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909747,0.00009141226,0.00037831152,0.00021125746,0.00009989163,0.00012167891],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031952315,0.00016620933,0.00021284222,0.000044685126,0.0002241841,0.00009431034,0.00021074335,0.0003999864,0.1581809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105714265,0.00016919707,0.00006640812,0.000008030898,0.0002877901,3.042273e-7,0.000065455344,0.00024411718,0.0039529023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000115205985,0.000018989113,0.000004118902,0.0001209544,0.000011955183,7.302709e-7,0.00077111623,0.0000044868375,2.3710486e-7,0.0044958713,0.99155825,0.0030017719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016466463,0.000026491589,0.000019075776,0.00007117263,0.000025753881,0.0000035146202,0.00031040085,0.000004865641,0.0000022010374,0.000053910073,0.999134,0.00018396661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018321317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034178544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.154228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025575537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041787527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982017872","doi":"","title":"Gender Stereotypes & Rape Myths: Investigating the Impact of Psychological Androgyny","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Androgyny; Mythology; Sample (material); Peer pressure; Gender role; Gender identity; Masculinity","score_opus":0.2589849062361362,"score_gpt":0.43052761261963435,"score_spread":0.17154270638349817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982017872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99439394,0.00003318913,0.00007074907,0.00092754205,0.000090027854,0.0003116675,0.000030785624,0.00020210708,0.0039399755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969776,0.00007654163,0.000023587741,0.00016774448,0.00011879232,0.0000022432098,0.00001106724,0.000016782213,0.0026056126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815387,0.00041612133,0.00022194354,0.0003596314,0.00038548862,0.00046293144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875325,0.0002495041,0.00019512691,0.00044066444,0.00013597177,0.00022551074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080932514,0.00017323036,0.00021268478,0.0001981064,0.00076035334,0.0001855391,0.0009765155,0.00016895846,0.00007123354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012068711,0.00013462343,0.00021316747,0.0013253883,0.000549095,0.0006748876,0.00027966363,0.00040425803,0.00025071375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016654356,0.00005638966,0.9896332,0.000009178772,0.00005161129,0.0000178567,0.0060021277,0.00007231631,0.00082667597,0.0027892732,0.000010786905,0.00051390065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000321041,0.00006788898,0.9911523,0.000027930064,0.000031755768,0.0000032741225,0.0028975399,0.0000012933291,0.000118202675,0.000940199,0.004262086,0.0001764735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083978215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008079366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004251299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012330397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016192751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982090603","doi":"","title":"A goal programming algorithm to incorporate the Columbia river non-power flow requirements in the Columbia River treaty model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Downstream (manufacturing); Flood myth; Flow (mathematics); Recreation; Weir; Pipeline (software); Plan (archaeology)","score_opus":0.01736291933256347,"score_gpt":0.23276372093139824,"score_spread":0.21540080159883476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982090603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.302499,0.00053177675,0.009351607,0.0020161222,0.0011499639,0.014397862,0.005344428,0.00060642534,0.6641028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.545355,0.00023008886,0.012925343,0.00039555226,0.0003492167,0.00006523014,0.00010772167,0.00019098895,0.4403808],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727416,0.00026731152,0.0002445404,0.0006509617,0.000836883,0.00072611455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984103,0.00006352038,0.00038245055,0.0007032833,0.00018144249,0.00025904138],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009408342,0.00012705769,0.00045529584,0.000064198655,0.0012323689,0.0006654071,0.0016049707,0.00039988788,0.00090844306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029682702,0.00032347647,0.00023369248,0.00090463384,0.0012843179,0.00034246987,0.00038897715,0.00041791264,0.00014148532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005852007,0.0005229835,0.00851921,0.000040909556,0.000105494655,0.00006483939,0.012855266,0.00002168357,0.0000028702561,0.000021783144,0.46009663,0.51774246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001129462,0.00007760461,0.45317677,0.0003477672,0.00018413107,0.0000071417803,0.0075288806,0.0010956802,1.934261e-8,0.0007828016,0.53501236,0.0006573795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89223844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5170851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031929094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003870732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982803324","doi":"","title":"Kyko Global Inc v. Omkar Bhongir","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Factoring; Pleading; Accounts receivable; Corporation; Probate; Statute; Damages; State (computer science); Subpoena","score_opus":0.02720074787563187,"score_gpt":0.29948545035978463,"score_spread":0.27228470248415276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982803324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07798732,0.00042615924,0.0004092356,0.053577416,0.00027671017,0.00044651187,0.00012184344,0.0004727005,0.8662821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892337,0.00004946219,0.0011232325,0.007310908,0.0008463862,0.000027916114,0.000011153086,0.000010219364,0.0013870458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987623,0.00007699638,0.00018433348,0.0002897806,0.0003432966,0.00034328978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911624,0.00003526096,0.000059135906,0.00021381819,0.00006643635,0.0005091296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019164664,0.00010668123,0.00013542044,0.000006542544,0.00064707035,0.00018526467,0.00047438688,0.000096548276,0.001270436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014744735,0.00010674305,0.00007967789,0.00041184254,0.00019852277,0.0002651958,0.00012408232,0.00018534978,0.0033862488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006137767,0.000031206204,0.0033249187,0.0000076112387,0.000011210364,0.0000049688697,0.000750532,0.000026492902,0.00008401855,0.9762441,0.018576644,0.0009321791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017156861,0.000018537005,0.0016596976,0.000005070244,0.000009922138,4.0346148e-7,0.0005774955,0.00005967616,0.000047795427,0.0066140983,0.9906889,0.00014678887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008753932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067718816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9721123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010722702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001864915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982846158","doi":"","title":"Kerr v. Danier Leather: an Analysis of the Difficulty to Enforce a Duty to Update Statements about the Future in the Context of Securities Regulation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Context (archaeology); Liability; Production (economics); Duty of care","score_opus":0.004731537590796633,"score_gpt":0.2270997123817503,"score_spread":0.22236817479095367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982846158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9531318,0.00009052789,0.0000073143033,0.00797711,0.0001454855,0.00062110287,0.0009380735,0.0000024809447,0.037086125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934074,0.00010430881,0.000040416937,0.00097389787,0.000059257985,0.00003510217,0.00009661796,0.000008247895,0.0052747154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764943,0.00016232525,0.00034545016,0.00017665872,0.00149343,0.0001726759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912953,0.00013331202,0.00031070856,0.0003292726,0.0000044547146,0.0000927467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006436757,0.00013149502,0.00023558314,0.000033143977,0.0003619825,0.00003721212,0.0006422717,0.000046591827,0.00003850038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006491785,0.00007741504,0.00006010909,0.00036004814,0.00009059205,0.00019124128,0.00005596138,0.00018503956,2.1217634e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027102965,0.000062184496,0.01085092,0.00009501265,0.00026080277,0.0000010222664,0.055228554,0.0004751745,0.0043516885,0.9202909,0.0008117197,0.007300975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113587084,0.000025504261,0.6167902,0.000074804055,0.00015238163,7.093591e-8,0.22403023,0.00024450678,0.003970337,0.0008036597,0.15363808,0.00015669387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063763365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94055396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91948724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012625103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009355597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94247115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983001368","doi":"","title":"The Law of Restitution","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Unjust enrichment; Tort; Wrongdoing; Unconscionability; Mistake; Equity (law); Constructive trust; Duty; Subrogation","score_opus":0.03271867622410677,"score_gpt":0.29950352551476844,"score_spread":0.26678484929066165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983001368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046753027,0.00040289038,0.0003712976,0.068642795,0.00018399951,0.00036825254,0.000019573403,0.00012598895,0.88313216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970065,0.000060130675,0.00020319094,0.0015269114,0.00032547224,0.0000147870005,0.0000018272368,0.000003774313,0.0008574419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993404,0.000064439955,0.00013262632,0.00010995845,0.00020922975,0.00014330162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952173,0.00007847129,0.000055927907,0.00015337937,0.000056460463,0.00013400348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026555217,0.000042117405,0.000062295374,0.00000292405,0.0008835951,0.000076355915,0.00028283027,0.000039672188,0.00009184252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014368007,0.00003157362,0.000044039323,0.00016461105,0.00043950722,0.00013373453,0.000045721685,0.000109541244,0.00023967722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003992609,0.000007423708,0.00012702917,0.0000024924643,0.0000033532183,2.8822154e-7,0.00056678575,0.000013898349,0.0003909351,0.9968645,0.0017754001,0.00024389496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006992024,0.0000118077805,0.00028672602,0.000004387575,0.0000049877553,7.299018e-8,0.0005099577,0.000021088083,0.00060404034,0.010384169,0.9880591,0.000043764354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010546629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011754509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98648036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024703699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008790266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99604225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983593458","doi":"","title":"NARROWING THE ATLANTIC: A STUDY OF THE USE OF ENGLISH PRECEDENTS IN CANADIAN CORPORATE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Realm; Common law; English law; Extraterritoriality","score_opus":0.29942875130509067,"score_gpt":0.33064183311973827,"score_spread":0.031213081814647603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983593458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99740475,0.000004187899,0.000001938482,0.00007850107,0.00015567426,0.000615023,0.00001510221,0.000016523569,0.001708269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990102,0.0000055893993,0.000004996667,0.00007672658,0.000027888651,0.0000017082435,0.0000011600441,0.000009344138,0.00086239487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984676,0.0005110659,0.0002069625,0.00020688408,0.0002986358,0.00030883524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988267,0.00008395949,0.00025198405,0.00044305107,0.0002453227,0.0001489898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053421507,0.00010440542,0.00015513254,0.00012931002,0.0004559741,0.0000840088,0.0010474068,0.00008465211,0.000014328404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000119903416,0.00008170378,0.00006527704,0.00071186904,0.00029713026,0.0008380576,0.0002140088,0.00027720848,0.0000057279794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001346901,0.00012368544,0.9542218,0.0000049643027,0.000019297528,0.000007919818,0.040862016,0.000016066842,0.000017310267,0.0046948357,2.4610057e-7,0.00001838519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032645673,0.000036377816,0.9831683,0.000052694228,0.000036740377,2.4877428e-7,0.009437379,1.6191764e-7,0.00014068546,0.00008519103,0.0066201314,0.000095635936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32865393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9900085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66135454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015950532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027105416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67581666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6985852197","doi":"","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Asset (computer security); Duty; Investment (military); Duty of care","score_opus":0.027505580476461133,"score_gpt":0.33515723485255033,"score_spread":0.3076516543760892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6985852197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027806887,0.000021050735,0.0012891198,0.033746317,0.00022182516,0.000043676224,1.8415814e-7,0.00006403036,0.9368069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677624,0.0000066013395,0.00053095014,0.00011749019,0.0029154795,0.000003851014,4.383266e-7,8.008206e-7,0.028661964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998236,0.000009382875,0.000020224534,0.000022889237,0.000044582306,0.00007937544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999036,0.000005452503,0.000005042465,0.000037933834,0.000009011717,0.000038929596],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015094959,0.000009102979,0.000010463239,0.0000045771494,0.0001458952,0.000009711302,0.000027216996,0.00000986346,0.001827194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018028464,0.000007686558,0.000006843298,0.000055259206,0.000022582155,0.00012320449,0.000005206014,0.000014297105,0.00071054936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.9574946e-8,0.0000086231585,0.0011207439,9.196507e-8,3.3977628e-7,1.3338001e-9,0.0008938759,1.3848582e-7,0.00006419716,0.9669738,0.028414577,0.0025235233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065390727,4.6961404e-7,0.0026061775,4.2178616e-8,6.321789e-7,4.172409e-8,0.00061757036,8.210987e-7,0.0001109252,0.0005549555,0.99608874,0.000013071964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048347216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000103464154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001303808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075630687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986164147","doi":"","title":"The Ontario insolvency case. : in the Privy Council, Council Chamber, Whitehall, December 12th, 1893 : the attorney-general of Ontario vs. the attorney-general of Canada : argument of Mr. Blake of the appellant.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Insolvency; Commission; Government (linguistics); Bankruptcy","score_opus":0.01735578991707854,"score_gpt":0.18958160168944602,"score_spread":0.17222581177236748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986164147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86557287,0.000054603683,0.000010006859,0.04879066,0.00019593595,0.00081111555,0.000077722616,0.0000122970105,0.084474795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92594856,0.00009584529,0.00008262718,0.00032575172,0.00007879733,0.0000053639196,0.0000053005792,0.0000139311705,0.073443815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966167,0.00057691184,0.00041823817,0.00030812802,0.0016099915,0.0004700313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973489,0.0005229634,0.00060083915,0.0010683485,0.00035332266,0.00010564616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012606463,0.00024295796,0.0003581477,0.000028763658,0.001035827,0.000055768167,0.001755558,0.00012990671,0.00023141838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009192679,0.00012694843,0.00022477238,0.00062310416,0.0009974377,0.0002903328,0.00047548677,0.00048412653,0.0000016910084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028709613,0.00045813658,0.18718232,0.000069302456,0.00031420766,0.000037142843,0.15221111,0.0016789945,0.00006454393,0.3262425,0.33123502,0.0002196095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037980825,0.000059816408,0.053525317,0.000035438403,0.00007798451,0.0000019333033,0.00572972,0.000026782285,0.00031864046,0.00036442257,0.9393217,0.0001584197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6080867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019501774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015884144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987137834","doi":"","title":"Shadd, M.A - Toronto, Aug 29, 1854. Agreement between M.A. Shadd","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Howard (Howard University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Limit (mathematics); Process (computing); Work (physics); Measure (data warehouse)","score_opus":0.04409124756424733,"score_gpt":0.2575326685334152,"score_spread":0.2134414209691679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987137834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06049948,0.0000832296,0.002734524,0.009674736,0.00011787455,0.00052963645,0.0005860099,0.0003974622,0.9253771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868776,0.000094201096,0.00013893525,0.00038771378,0.00056495686,0.0000019901188,0.000106305306,0.000018678755,0.011809621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981827,0.00005818256,0.0001946471,0.00050069386,0.00054703077,0.0005167549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881124,0.00008161023,0.00006190145,0.0002661205,0.00013318921,0.00064592314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011630094,0.0002137697,0.00027267204,0.00005511257,0.00062238623,0.00035200868,0.0008913747,0.00014014171,0.00067813916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008599516,0.00024117956,0.00022645609,0.0005581196,0.00027627693,0.0015083684,0.00037917896,0.00018491647,0.0006530795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107896114,0.00029208785,0.038702726,0.00006446543,0.0003709956,0.00014180562,0.022458652,0.000028125987,0.00012439642,0.8398278,0.043460477,0.054420568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003869432,0.00007967751,0.0021467283,0.0000106717025,0.000047013844,2.3608713e-7,0.007430953,0.0000148362415,0.000067048866,0.00043200853,0.9890668,0.00031713038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018630584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011260671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005026184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002826072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987262865","doi":"","title":"Snelling, Richard (1834-93)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.021794445234049453,"score_gpt":0.28968967663019013,"score_spread":0.2678952313961407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987262865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08427792,0.00018666207,0.002860064,0.0063601127,0.00044771063,0.00031743405,0.000012302767,0.00032492,0.9052129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97822654,0.000059741567,0.0011627987,0.0017434701,0.0011674806,0.000039165814,0.00000627684,0.000015489028,0.017579049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987464,0.00011629475,0.00018404797,0.0002672192,0.00031906096,0.00036696985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991081,0.00010020647,0.000073173476,0.00034163098,0.000077434,0.00029950278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065725786,0.00010275367,0.00013416818,0.000022357774,0.00085985265,0.00018426297,0.0004199871,0.00010096349,0.0010271979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015263418,0.0000994081,0.00008349498,0.00021622748,0.00019407945,0.00020866215,0.000060506245,0.00020612367,0.0034624725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018962423,0.00003008691,0.0010631423,0.0000038991775,0.000005978614,5.131868e-7,0.0005656639,0.000021216094,0.00017370952,0.9896259,0.007090708,0.0014173198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013310628,0.000013632199,0.0006993786,0.000008358572,0.000008812482,2.7012135e-7,0.00021115433,0.000080801736,0.00021197296,0.020109398,0.9783785,0.00014466731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008033448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006700982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063347856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007610872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987281178","doi":"","title":"âSoldiers for Sale: German âMercenariesâ with the British in Canada during the American Revolution, 1776-83 (Book Review)â by Jean-Pierre Wilhelmy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Fusible alloy; Durvalumab; Demotion","score_opus":0.006720461804511589,"score_gpt":0.22354863321005913,"score_spread":0.21682817140554755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987281178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5941472,0.027954755,0.0008600104,0.3378936,0.00027439208,0.0048296093,0.0015141126,0.00024650944,0.03227979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.870211,0.031497784,0.00012442411,0.0072218343,0.00015027821,0.00006563757,0.000027957367,0.00005377408,0.09064732],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827963,0.00032177015,0.00017854685,0.0003337151,0.0003599728,0.0005263519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859416,0.0003583638,0.00020564228,0.000503496,0.00015197249,0.00018634532],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004379884,0.00015346099,0.00023552601,0.00004933513,0.0032115593,0.00014748913,0.0010257895,0.000037155583,0.00010274334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013476775,0.000107244465,0.000080045684,0.001045275,0.0008838541,0.0005574193,0.00014273374,0.0003252546,0.0000056868257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009102755,0.000058179103,0.021807162,0.00006023788,0.00010743071,0.000049402384,0.0006087094,0.000029691377,0.00009955201,0.009615754,0.95879847,0.0086743655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038946426,0.000015640693,0.011072888,0.00020779835,0.000048644873,0.000002456528,0.0014258676,0.000003235301,0.000010401293,0.000031301282,0.9865913,0.00020100566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66069317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98004055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33067176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010553235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011186311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987372762","doi":"","title":"Stuck in Neutral? Reforming Corporate Purpose and Fiduciary Duties","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Shareholder; Corporate law; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Legislation; Legislature; Companies Act; Shareholder resolution","score_opus":0.04548493495552139,"score_gpt":0.3030163922048246,"score_spread":0.25753145724930326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987372762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93805754,0.00018834656,0.0000027797075,0.004177919,0.00012995604,0.00028835892,0.000014795916,0.00017637754,0.056963913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913759,0.0002654359,0.0001031203,0.00040152174,0.00019890435,0.0000613787,0.000010010639,0.000011264413,0.007572453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990034,0.000076637385,0.0001881056,0.00023142227,0.00016409124,0.00033633577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994868,0.000068219066,0.00007543156,0.00018160253,0.000032584845,0.0001553844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006380432,0.00008802568,0.00012796152,0.000060526192,0.00054133334,0.00013424768,0.000201037,0.00007780902,0.00007803826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006539394,0.00008373827,0.00003098724,0.0005609726,0.00020628709,0.00038690312,0.00008447036,0.00018954465,0.00033028104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007771326,0.000029356606,0.016400646,0.000017030336,0.000006232888,0.000021356684,0.003930514,0.000044409422,0.00036484588,0.9751213,0.0016086228,0.0024478666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005012051,0.000036321802,0.06043301,0.00006596505,0.00001191084,0.0000021280428,0.010779094,0.00012343281,0.000539536,0.08742366,0.8396939,0.00038983228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048050456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8876977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006666788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009755026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990106468","doi":"","title":"Costs Immunity: Banishing the 'Bane' of Costs from\\nPublic Interest Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Order (exchange); Economic Justice; Cost–benefit analysis; Interest rate; Common law","score_opus":0.031057823481930286,"score_gpt":0.28825669251554636,"score_spread":0.2571988690336161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990106468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8805123,0.00016498752,0.00008803687,0.011780372,0.00018678035,0.00052167353,0.000038521666,0.00008188241,0.106625445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971832,0.000042365053,0.00024902125,0.0009577463,0.00031204292,0.000096354124,0.00003922516,0.000012840413,0.0011072195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986729,0.0002746181,0.00029015559,0.0001896092,0.0003020399,0.00027067537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858403,0.0003815857,0.0001714329,0.00046101635,0.00022827557,0.00017366576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005847064,0.00010415815,0.00014165885,0.000023677849,0.00080096186,0.0005093209,0.0007205382,0.00010129652,0.0016928635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035761975,0.000082448336,0.00007783097,0.0002832007,0.00036813307,0.0007929068,0.00015093293,0.00033555803,0.0007282855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003272217,0.00006741766,0.0035358889,0.0000051347674,0.00002687938,3.5682862e-7,0.002516322,0.000002529678,0.0037012284,0.9777482,0.004848125,0.0075446167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006036891,0.00005897961,0.07038315,0.00018426935,0.000046135257,0.00000106608,0.015275736,0.00018318943,0.0049610585,0.0492233,0.8586287,0.0004507516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23833211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054654174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001993434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012355659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991415300","doi":"","title":"Ginger Gardner, individually, and as guardian of her minor child, Abrina Lynn Gardner; Heather Ann Gardner; and Joshua Lee Gardner v. SPX Corporation; HOJ Engineering and Sales Co., Inc., d/b/a Dock and Door Services, a Utah corporation; and Schneider Canada, Inc., a Canadian Corporation : Reply Brief","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Guardian; Appeal; DOCK; FAUST","score_opus":0.007600212786050294,"score_gpt":0.22874631646835678,"score_spread":0.22114610368230647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991415300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97302395,0.0016943709,0.0000663166,0.011153171,0.00012295313,0.0012854468,0.0003384928,0.00010298362,0.012212324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927085,0.00062977953,0.0014261841,0.0026546596,0.00021176068,0.000045146382,0.00022607243,0.000043694552,0.0020541989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714637,0.00013436172,0.0006678206,0.00084720564,0.0005844279,0.0006198084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784005,0.00010278115,0.00039570383,0.0003915761,0.00033133163,0.0009385601],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007784109,0.00046075723,0.0005567054,0.0002892138,0.0010569372,0.00070972013,0.00019750821,0.00026692616,0.00008490693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009577881,0.00045662007,0.000039745617,0.0003893916,0.0004526492,0.00086627953,0.00011077851,0.00030274628,0.000003657796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031054075,0.0004569225,0.68595403,0.00085654896,0.0007423429,0.00020503969,0.034503885,0.0003899534,0.0043122964,0.17868616,0.058203854,0.035378445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020304136,0.0003214439,0.5294068,0.00018745381,0.00019410804,0.00019644816,0.0027397661,0.0027397065,0.00022014258,0.0015308256,0.45916906,0.0012638628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8631572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95803046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4009652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017879397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010934795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991543072","doi":"","title":"Hryniak: Two Years Later: The Multiple Applications of ‘That Summary Judgment Case’ From the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Summary judgment; Context (archaeology); Supreme Court Decisions","score_opus":0.03169144729742371,"score_gpt":0.27704125315633327,"score_spread":0.24534980585890956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991543072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92342484,0.0011776007,0.0003170198,0.021123156,0.0003619926,0.0018847872,0.0012312244,0.00006535376,0.05041401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746513,0.000029108314,0.0002721023,0.0005607912,0.00022266073,0.00012071465,0.00002243566,0.000010051505,0.0012969892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872446,0.0001395414,0.00024315342,0.0001746773,0.0004916751,0.00022647636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858856,0.00038967901,0.0001580153,0.0005475707,0.00013827063,0.00017790661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006101912,0.000087441076,0.00014163362,0.000009135278,0.00043027184,0.00004672695,0.0005891149,0.000045045017,0.00010940316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007321449,0.000060097656,0.00005823639,0.0001986644,0.00031956288,0.00009521523,0.000120980454,0.00015962815,0.00002013507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006492433,0.0004218135,0.1362614,0.000025483996,0.00030868233,0.000041915224,0.020129077,0.0014232736,0.0010689059,0.5524956,0.28277606,0.00498285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003221039,0.000008230953,0.0040696384,0.000011800041,0.00003173738,0.000002140379,0.0057749925,0.00008634126,0.0005613706,0.0024892427,0.98654187,0.00010054177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94705385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97397023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7037658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014545879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007276684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33093464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992507364","doi":"","title":"Liability for the acts of third parties : in the aftermath of stolen cars and the Canadian case of Rankin v J.J","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Duty; Supreme court; Duty of care; Accident (philosophy); Criminal liability; Contributory negligence; High Court","score_opus":0.019005930799874414,"score_gpt":0.2415367098465616,"score_spread":0.22253077904668717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992507364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9636196,0.0005926193,0.00035648598,0.0032983962,0.000103269136,0.0010146046,0.00041869917,0.00001028231,0.030586042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992222,0.00024792246,0.00018307193,0.000009587402,0.000029690003,9.248001e-7,0.0000036445572,0.000003358823,0.00029955903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984869,0.00031355835,0.000306375,0.00024730692,0.00042678183,0.00021908626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796027,0.00090256304,0.00029702712,0.00043255894,0.00032703538,0.0000805247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017167024,0.00013788519,0.00029840457,0.00009265774,0.0016662637,0.00003494423,0.0009657417,0.00013983955,0.000025803234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006668996,0.00009654041,0.00025794524,0.00041398915,0.0072097816,0.00033093413,0.00010195471,0.0003041848,8.334215e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022479368,0.00010809565,0.00089775055,0.00019928406,0.00016360804,0.000071085524,0.04667451,0.0005958165,0.00072448316,0.94977486,0.000093264534,0.0004724233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041969134,0.00047355425,0.103487924,0.0009108569,0.0015013544,0.00030371657,0.8039458,0.0046118163,0.0020341638,0.02305399,0.054819506,0.0006604263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2729571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36677405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001453586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022482758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6992680832","doi":"","title":"McMurrich, W.B. (1842-1939)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Head (geology); Product (mathematics); Work (physics); Process (computing)","score_opus":0.019280158082618824,"score_gpt":0.29094438607655154,"score_spread":0.2716642279939327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6992680832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07336009,0.00009659539,0.0010055968,0.007278936,0.00035422883,0.0002717963,0.000011075779,0.0002849198,0.91733676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97633696,0.00003154915,0.0009771994,0.0023666283,0.0010253207,0.00004579101,0.0000061421333,0.000014753346,0.019195668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987133,0.0001310618,0.00018080283,0.00026379694,0.00033197773,0.0003790426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990616,0.000110658715,0.000066662855,0.00036566824,0.00007620391,0.00031921206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006071464,0.000102840335,0.0001325895,0.000023166825,0.00090065825,0.00018236876,0.00044102818,0.00010011,0.0010745316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021080201,0.00009895637,0.00008048766,0.00025537985,0.00021968686,0.00024887608,0.00007423297,0.00019769177,0.003114236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016237466,0.00003117662,0.001335753,0.000003185045,0.0000049481473,4.90232e-7,0.00032549005,0.0000089583755,0.00012484228,0.9888029,0.0073882835,0.0019723375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014717483,0.000013951461,0.0017204466,0.000007375492,0.000008253428,3.5971703e-7,0.00017556352,0.000040696286,0.00012866606,0.017215533,0.9803971,0.00014485732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010183093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010282187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9730088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007534917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008810174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6994302393","doi":"","title":"Svěřenský fond","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Civil law (Civil law); Everyday life","score_opus":0.015890966844186408,"score_gpt":0.30886914565691226,"score_spread":0.29297817881272586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6994302393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08861668,0.0025419146,0.000004737927,0.000120899094,0.002475156,0.00052242464,0.00023936393,0.00014175625,0.9053371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72553325,0.000024960165,0.000100054465,0.000034652592,0.001704641,0.00007361513,0.0014749173,0.000050798633,0.27100313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953521,0.00013190634,0.00094558677,0.0006802109,0.0025054112,0.00038479207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935508,0.00022565684,0.00090079335,0.00043936167,0.004510046,0.00037335092],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003616403,0.00040999337,0.00048334154,0.00029003288,0.0008762553,0.0017644952,0.00070859893,0.00071519765,0.000011806722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000682214,0.00042322694,0.00040718738,0.0005767223,0.00029924643,0.0013734321,0.000053501954,0.00055597804,0.000033664826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010715525,0.002282268,0.006576979,0.001351538,0.0012184996,0.00042821548,0.07399592,0.00012535008,0.01622278,0.703507,0.18038617,0.012833749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004107016,0.00010929632,0.0039910413,0.0007158264,0.00010184195,0.00005364237,0.0022632636,0.00001847294,0.0032622116,0.016882896,0.9713462,0.00084462535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017093722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005748797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005302013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026336615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996154831","doi":"","title":"Reference re: Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Legislation","score_opus":0.037478818990681895,"score_gpt":0.2663550254654193,"score_spread":0.2288762064747374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996154831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07993568,9.810226e-7,0.00014888801,0.000256087,0.000056303383,0.00031011028,0.000115244045,0.00010684875,0.9190699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679918,0.028340368,0.0016124609,0.00023273173,0.00018558619,0.0000021226444,0.000010589768,0.000010742983,0.0016135608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990191,0.000088652116,0.0001214044,0.00027464083,0.00022772816,0.00026849555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925864,0.00004769821,0.00010908974,0.00024455434,0.00025772795,0.00008227136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022300307,0.00006398318,0.0001394584,0.00019219161,0.0006883966,0.00011601159,0.0004410069,0.00012463317,0.00022937305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019635518,0.00010777803,0.000100864985,0.0035350572,0.00076403585,0.00033351016,0.00015082305,0.00013071983,0.000025755067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011526014,0.0015252626,0.012237675,0.0002259997,0.00037575734,0.000062245635,0.12408603,0.0000029994148,0.00027388506,0.54762834,0.1959287,0.11753785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026982522,0.000051218172,0.00034586655,0.000024622912,0.000022502692,6.944031e-7,0.0032801377,0.000015729811,0.00004373198,0.000017273262,0.99579746,0.00013095797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93501985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9593697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9174563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012938776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004341623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.529466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996225851","doi":"","title":"Review of C. Nicholls, Corporate Finance and Canadian Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate law; Corporate governance; Corporate finance; Work (physics); Debt","score_opus":0.035138146597853526,"score_gpt":0.27367971133807256,"score_spread":0.23854156474021904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996225851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045186885,0.015000888,0.00003071757,0.009551732,0.000025177756,0.00018645776,0.000022669943,0.000011607276,0.92998385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9186963,0.0749696,0.00048652143,0.00021756388,0.000010614775,1.085259e-7,0.0000019587058,0.0000016825735,0.0056156865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996755,0.000027622187,0.000038679344,0.00008160635,0.00007215482,0.00010444059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996121,0.000012443577,0.000102139085,0.000111374735,0.00007058303,0.00009139105],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015672708,0.000032890977,0.00010030017,0.0000067780115,0.00023643285,0.0000035731878,0.00014663243,0.00003118323,0.0021314123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000085599495,0.000041411804,0.000026239895,0.00006475336,0.00021689563,0.00018689634,0.00002461461,0.000027019263,0.0000063998405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086029595,0.00003317386,0.0021767078,0.00026066077,0.000017892837,0.000007040202,0.010586453,0.0000016425919,0.000059005026,0.9526616,0.008170861,0.02601639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010097427,0.000014120056,0.034404874,0.0002586472,0.000017487866,4.2855828e-7,0.0033792288,0.000009624899,0.0000025498305,0.00016416537,0.9615837,0.000064254185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9868748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010117057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015580097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997057325","doi":"","title":"University of Leicester Student Law Review 11, vol. 1","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Tort; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.06624540165440398,"score_gpt":0.3316342171105375,"score_spread":0.26538881545613346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997057325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022727482,0.0065522287,0.0000012682088,0.010111767,0.00014008771,0.0014911683,0.2423048,0.0001455542,0.7369804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585559,0.00033004323,0.000054424032,0.0033334848,0.00017601639,0.00008317643,0.016009066,0.000011988982,0.021445908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956447,0.00005839479,0.000047911017,0.000074259646,0.00018542551,0.000069561596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997168,0.000027338854,0.00005194095,0.00010794697,0.000064509135,0.00003143882],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007517606,0.000023961054,0.000055248758,0.0000055619466,0.00044660637,0.000007747914,0.0003014421,0.000009469936,0.3308913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039188646,0.000027004413,0.00003944145,0.00012933822,0.000010927345,0.00005494205,0.00020853878,0.00005048191,0.00028983835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.7502245e-7,0.000048494705,0.00009873555,0.00012800994,0.000004715163,0.000002243641,0.0015218076,0.0000069068574,0.0000018561692,0.030357566,0.96745855,0.000370557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031588243,0.0000047435387,0.0005787465,0.00017007353,0.000004688973,7.7829185e-8,0.0008175699,0.0000010181666,0.0000016672765,0.000025744774,0.9983309,0.000033171287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010125212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018574899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95628315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043943255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057574343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66972035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997102580","doi":"","title":"Tate &amp; Lyle: Pure Economic Loss and the Modern Tort of Public Nuisance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuisance; Tort; State (computer science); Cause of action; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.11836909988520067,"score_gpt":0.3386049848221775,"score_spread":0.22023588493697682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997102580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98858905,0.00009483218,0.001214674,0.0067185014,0.00009981599,0.00029891363,0.00005583584,0.00006295863,0.0028654034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981836,0.0004218415,0.000018168035,0.0001166675,0.00010407962,0.000002674085,0.0000025791524,0.000014521507,0.01748343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854445,0.00031971332,0.00019931883,0.0003495485,0.00023159021,0.0003553924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880147,0.00023155505,0.00021092771,0.00044582723,0.00010559724,0.00020461943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082338694,0.00014765923,0.00022312727,0.00010650305,0.00049687416,0.0001951281,0.0008259165,0.00012110514,0.00005269653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060305792,0.0001073018,0.000096197036,0.00018778104,0.0010615606,0.0013628978,0.00028850307,0.00017002711,0.00012643145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004913975,0.00003122224,0.9198973,0.000011053085,0.000043506898,0.00000492641,0.0022472609,0.0000035224518,0.00023576082,0.0746587,0.0000026373752,0.0028149642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036037106,0.000036748588,0.7219536,0.00012638042,0.00010375783,0.000010518108,0.0008924431,8.0829807e-7,0.00038749547,0.01782128,0.25449276,0.0005705399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000082066384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0187442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25449014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019076889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020804293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997245490","doi":"","title":"The Unjust Enrichment Apocalypse in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Adjudication; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Common law","score_opus":0.0763954938719483,"score_gpt":0.3520149378528412,"score_spread":0.2756194439808929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997245490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870739,0.00036648576,0.000009257785,0.0060300324,0.000113155045,0.0002770789,0.0000099225,0.000012551701,0.0061076046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95768845,0.00040345034,0.00001968586,0.000003504744,0.00005605741,0.0000017155913,0.0000011751595,0.0000028960712,0.041823052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988119,0.00019158273,0.000088865534,0.00017859724,0.00045179503,0.0002772639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944204,0.00020851832,0.000023153343,0.0001344291,0.00007390972,0.000117935866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066205417,0.000047300953,0.00007330915,0.000046186247,0.00093323167,0.00011632683,0.00028726287,0.000042925752,0.000019138744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011622255,0.00004004895,0.000025422867,0.00028610305,0.00046988355,0.00015463399,0.0001137858,0.0002498269,0.000007905203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015086588,0.00021445617,0.39043587,0.0007607252,0.0002201873,0.00116851,0.04391584,0.00007605346,0.0077749724,0.48773366,0.042070124,0.025478728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020607968,0.00005717728,0.16884832,0.00017952513,0.000015937336,0.000005704403,0.07184405,0.00025623434,0.0010055045,0.0007337426,0.7566737,0.00017405947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94702935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8184348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71460354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034349386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096256525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71777576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998481330","doi":"","title":"All Change for Residential Tenancies in Wales","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renting; Leasehold estate; Redevelopment; Key (lock); Rental housing; Quarter (Canadian coin); Real property; Residential property","score_opus":0.24223991311843074,"score_gpt":0.4035100150585892,"score_spread":0.16127010194015845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998481330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8771355,0.00031301315,0.00016915642,0.033402957,0.00056148705,0.004572525,0.0005041,0.00028393976,0.083057314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708396,0.00029366094,0.00019491384,0.00016742237,0.0008218563,0.0001954447,0.00008529069,0.000031573596,0.02737022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959969,0.0009843196,0.00025763555,0.00058940763,0.0010892655,0.0010824746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998223,0.00058262976,0.00010622238,0.00045619736,0.00036406436,0.00026788912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031737085,0.00015301458,0.00024083418,0.00086725503,0.0032696147,0.00013744523,0.0013666251,0.00011208805,0.00040054857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000302564,0.00018422128,0.00018070113,0.0019914228,0.0005445884,0.00045589556,0.00073299184,0.000729129,0.000043844546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052460615,0.00040039796,0.0480177,0.000048770064,0.00007321374,0.00017135317,0.021125345,0.00008823543,0.00024274147,0.9122522,0.006274068,0.010781398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091993506,0.00009520306,0.012825916,0.0000110870915,0.000014763278,0.0000011632686,0.0102558555,0.000121406265,0.000013518538,0.004238381,0.9712729,0.00022986007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042419553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15225397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96499884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007303933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097553484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998842309","doi":"","title":"The Attorney Generalâs Obligation to Report Breaches of Rights in Proposed Legislation: How the Canadian and New Zealand Reporting Cultures Differ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Jurisdiction; Charter; Legislation; Independence (probability theory); Bill of rights","score_opus":0.015416064659273808,"score_gpt":0.21344332782847497,"score_spread":0.19802726316920116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998842309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6032949,0.00031708303,0.0000027626636,0.040895537,0.00029113828,0.0009220107,0.00008216768,0.0000074197123,0.35418698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91455466,0.00006511921,0.00013327581,0.00014507663,0.00011849354,0.000015517764,0.000046990204,0.000008191493,0.08491269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980871,0.000071732014,0.00045984826,0.00021612765,0.0009406859,0.00022449266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868375,0.00011883043,0.00073321006,0.00019237696,0.000003694625,0.00026811703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007640192,0.00013392935,0.00018873122,0.000024020266,0.0008432996,0.000093366885,0.00021813156,0.000056870933,0.000005363781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003288028,0.00008698618,0.00002371479,0.00011364514,0.00009600002,0.00017686856,0.000028161186,0.00014957364,1.0223681e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023513405,0.00002584073,0.13982566,0.00011665959,0.00015642021,0.00008925066,0.026045453,0.000028817862,0.00394083,0.80152696,0.016727045,0.011281906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010853108,0.000016821868,0.4766499,0.00011807073,0.000027995578,0.0000039532865,0.00724497,0.0000321595,0.0060941987,0.0073963157,0.5021003,0.00020678675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9168201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99902844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7941307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022056325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004724052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8380265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998888891","doi":"","title":"ATU, Local 508 v Halifax (Regional Municipality)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Grievance; Jurisdiction; Discipline; Suspension (topology)","score_opus":0.03669377881909151,"score_gpt":0.3205816287450366,"score_spread":0.28388784992594507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998888891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16022547,0.00046128788,0.006242864,0.0076148757,0.00037559145,0.0004383218,0.000031708358,0.00031705605,0.82429284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849095,0.000043710777,0.00085742935,0.0026345626,0.00080890895,0.000020448246,0.000017270404,0.000015144601,0.010693055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983105,0.00009123213,0.0002757082,0.00029048682,0.00049166963,0.0005404101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988401,0.00015789061,0.00007755543,0.00037172748,0.000104497834,0.0004482117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010944556,0.00012299012,0.00014507203,0.000038914404,0.0009072573,0.00010985927,0.0005012557,0.00015462913,0.00076163455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007527242,0.00012248367,0.00011575477,0.00038591382,0.00061629305,0.00025338403,0.00009197386,0.0002968451,0.0010737752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009117154,0.00006552285,0.00086924667,0.0000034555871,0.000010078415,0.0000061626747,0.00066339696,0.000019338355,0.00008612332,0.99247867,0.0038567556,0.0019321279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019991178,0.000013213714,0.0027576643,0.000011066264,0.000009504464,0.0000014349533,0.0014390716,0.000019515284,0.00018016632,0.009873116,0.98532295,0.00017239295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06352626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11983443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017537057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018473934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999717023","doi":"","title":"The Deification of Process in Canada's Duty to Consult: Tsleil-Waututh Nation v Canada (Attorney General)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Process (computing); Work (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.013369160069457202,"score_gpt":0.2618970038937613,"score_spread":0.2485278438243041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999717023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96667325,0.00007141893,0.000010485557,0.00854076,0.0002625489,0.0006240225,0.00005407264,0.000013109521,0.023750355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736065,0.000016197691,0.000065618086,0.0007401331,0.00009675068,0.00007899366,0.000012796901,0.000007673796,0.001621209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986578,0.00008460679,0.0002796271,0.00020939445,0.0004994637,0.00026910056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990657,0.00013833267,0.00012754297,0.00026869186,0.0002346526,0.00016508132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003818753,0.00008130088,0.00011748725,0.000018650662,0.0003663693,0.000055701876,0.00040023145,0.0000410955,0.0000768642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020725638,0.00006883529,0.000017884648,0.00042350107,0.000054553693,0.00011957319,0.000029116325,0.00012895933,0.00002339013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002173508,0.000036949965,0.08299948,0.0000308484,0.00001605404,0.0000013005038,0.0018140053,0.0025388896,0.0007887839,0.90410984,0.0059095286,0.0017325995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027496956,0.000010283527,0.082463704,0.00002554621,0.000006225012,2.3837572e-7,0.00323614,0.00031982336,0.0016997353,0.0009877136,0.9107718,0.000203821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9996718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9048623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010307094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006773695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999801020","doi":"","title":"Developments in Contract Law: The 2020-2021 Term – Appeals to Fairness","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Term (time); Confusion; Supreme court; Good faith; Control (management); Undue influence","score_opus":0.018666002131941,"score_gpt":0.2957747861899201,"score_spread":0.2771087840579791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999801020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48607233,0.00024512253,0.000057202797,0.029297201,0.00060096313,0.001618009,0.00009038334,0.000099000565,0.4819198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98982924,0.000015659924,0.00015312448,0.0045408956,0.00024812963,0.0005110017,0.000011780936,0.000011915007,0.004678266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983513,0.00024577256,0.0002483492,0.00028755283,0.00047037762,0.00039668576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930227,0.00012127202,0.00006720266,0.00028558902,0.00004097347,0.00018269873],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010269559,0.000102775884,0.00014317058,0.000022681263,0.0016581378,0.00019282234,0.00072620274,0.000041044867,0.0013512053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006785605,0.000088527995,0.00005134819,0.0005138895,0.00011381918,0.00017540983,0.00030803942,0.00031920735,0.00045432846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011259972,0.00009168683,0.006165734,0.0000029414198,0.000011304487,0.000011374272,0.0043465714,0.00011207336,0.00025213216,0.9837988,0.0027883488,0.0024077548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021576378,0.0000108892655,0.01847443,0.000008038824,0.000004019483,9.688131e-7,0.0020589128,0.000004005597,0.00007377266,0.0025025927,0.97649944,0.0001471711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024882574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06327274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98129624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002672383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002344423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999924425","doi":"","title":"Disclaimers and Exclusion Clauses as Risk-Allocation Devices in Canadian Tort and Contract Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Exclusion clause; Breach of contract; Delict; Damages; Privity of contract; Indemnity","score_opus":0.011229283807738194,"score_gpt":0.280322071968568,"score_spread":0.2690927881608298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999924425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8946587,0.00041303626,0.0000017631667,0.0027088532,0.000072595365,0.00036825697,0.0000151863715,0.000023871,0.10173777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765146,0.0003513187,0.00007311448,0.0010041001,0.000084539526,0.000019519819,0.00000905441,0.000008072214,0.0007988327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990766,0.00008642959,0.00014587338,0.00024281107,0.00016153022,0.00028675326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992975,0.00009249757,0.00006685063,0.00014521657,0.00003625419,0.00036165395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045668514,0.00008623312,0.000116424744,0.000034986497,0.0005848422,0.00018524176,0.00012551127,0.00009772038,0.00022377392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059461556,0.00008224615,0.000018233515,0.0001287348,0.00016225153,0.00044450842,0.000038515293,0.00016047314,0.00013545282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005626636,0.000015322417,0.2632476,0.00000806037,0.0000062124395,0.000001441929,0.001475804,0.0000079523,0.00013887463,0.73361105,0.000059496662,0.0014225495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032553406,0.000025175386,0.24334338,0.000034753542,0.000014016068,9.4238266e-7,0.001776864,0.00007717565,0.00005436318,0.0039870925,0.75017524,0.00018548823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96594095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99359417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7501157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001375772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024232037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44981924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999932098","doi":"","title":"Does it Need an Intervention? An Examination of Interveners in Business Cases at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Legislation","score_opus":0.019189820405070914,"score_gpt":0.2893317314313426,"score_spread":0.2701419110262717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999932098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99105495,0.0000248127,0.000010553179,0.0024172887,0.00017705832,0.00027346017,0.000046093337,0.000009774108,0.0059860265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962806,0.000008746901,0.000031044958,0.000105600615,0.00005275463,0.000019370878,0.0000264532,0.000006805727,0.0034686248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887097,0.00022637987,0.00029245345,0.00016065523,0.00029314865,0.0001563732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917626,0.00010278796,0.00016401976,0.00028673385,0.00019494441,0.00007522109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007779455,0.00007025309,0.00013442933,0.000031037085,0.0001459038,0.000034073262,0.00034244603,0.000045251163,0.0006905263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011449036,0.000046432622,0.000040818202,0.00028467033,0.00014971317,0.00036048106,0.00006631041,0.00007648296,0.000005551043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001945714,0.001573698,0.24027416,0.0005181385,0.00011634009,0.000015430627,0.0257019,0.0030946878,0.012577627,0.7026075,0.003421965,0.0099039925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013208996,0.0002063339,0.76680267,0.00035308333,0.000042490392,0.000002303136,0.061869547,0.000555179,0.007074543,0.0014171352,0.1599073,0.00044851936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8851475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70119035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020645742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021984802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75607795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000094823","doi":"","title":"Economic Torts in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.01340024501506362,"score_gpt":0.2573041088783631,"score_spread":0.24390386386329946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000094823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78116965,0.000053685333,0.000013317318,0.009752267,0.00028673775,0.00015098685,0.00002843633,0.000028220791,0.20851669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436074,0.000036526188,0.000050115123,0.0005551041,0.00023379028,0.000025333997,8.4040266e-7,0.000005390764,0.004732183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932927,0.00003618702,0.00013245929,0.00015435065,0.00010806449,0.00023966657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955773,0.000066921835,0.00003461653,0.00016852774,0.000011823673,0.00016039098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017079755,0.000051651583,0.00007653416,0.000010983873,0.00016962973,0.00003301774,0.00020640525,0.000030906926,0.0014191982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000292687,0.000041026924,0.000021009337,0.000051839103,0.000060642873,0.0001739643,0.000031833868,0.00005464685,0.00045354516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002275923,0.0000091176025,0.055705037,0.0000013731881,0.000003495645,0.0000043605623,0.00015403947,0.000011955631,0.00011781423,0.9314213,0.009265897,0.0033033432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013239129,0.0000023534697,0.017836677,0.000009216546,0.000001211509,1.812914e-7,0.00019392112,0.0000023665132,0.00012662467,0.0034404893,0.9781669,0.00008767906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99397826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99974555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.968901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011097506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014670169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000428438","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary Law Workshop","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Constitution; Duty of care; Payment","score_opus":0.024045821366587943,"score_gpt":0.29364702673969373,"score_spread":0.2696012053731058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000428438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07030151,0.00025069178,0.00011235776,0.017443035,0.00028696746,0.0005047054,0.000009050184,0.00024881156,0.9108429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682283,0.000041330684,0.00095495564,0.0043901633,0.0007880447,0.00014568934,0.000007438532,0.000015032701,0.025429053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987914,0.000084543695,0.00018236165,0.0002563357,0.00028959336,0.00039576882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990595,0.000116128744,0.000055562403,0.00036171966,0.00009212035,0.0003149466],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029431196,0.00010319011,0.0001211534,0.000015586751,0.00096797425,0.0003338771,0.0004283946,0.00011793987,0.00469569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078323064,0.00009783688,0.000079402,0.00022970786,0.00030917622,0.0005593093,0.00008991474,0.00023868076,0.007200397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.714241e-7,0.000034176286,0.0002668903,0.0000025034744,0.0000064035175,8.913589e-7,0.000509091,0.0000058748565,0.00012783958,0.97496223,0.023029754,0.0010534622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010270852,0.0000054141515,0.0009834347,0.0000112317175,0.0000062063787,3.6691745e-7,0.000810137,0.000014127878,0.00011081104,0.03753712,0.96026856,0.00014989042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054044858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029520689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93742514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074199575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008607424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99621415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001353669","doi":"","title":"Janet Walker &amp; Barry Glaspell on Jurisdiction &amp; Conflicts of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Class (philosophy); Conflict of laws; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.04579913776804807,"score_gpt":0.30648697739242736,"score_spread":0.2606878396243793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001353669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2248508,0.00015914153,0.00030849603,0.015917588,0.00029197484,0.00054305,0.000098912795,0.00022061716,0.7576094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865341,0.000071833456,0.00056086294,0.0050830287,0.0007232255,0.000018747238,0.00004521208,0.000020168387,0.006942784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984305,0.00012680997,0.00030971284,0.00034343393,0.0004750207,0.0003145358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888486,0.00011096049,0.00013671824,0.00034534794,0.00010456495,0.00041754555],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031644144,0.00014338252,0.00021336826,0.000020652975,0.00043569843,0.000097841024,0.0003530836,0.0001520195,0.0017154296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107494925,0.0001419306,0.00011122209,0.0002573177,0.00032388803,0.0002144485,0.00006804659,0.0003033856,0.004380472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003143338,0.00008118827,0.00032924325,0.000018629153,0.000020162273,0.0000010263328,0.0039320267,0.000106002226,0.0025204145,0.9778894,0.0148615725,0.00020890134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026410638,0.000037626596,0.00047418356,0.000017071405,0.000018025943,3.1730625e-7,0.00012965382,0.000012909855,0.0010385861,0.0023013214,0.99554914,0.00015706592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015039399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017907556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98068756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006383656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001687717","doi":"","title":"Le Barreau Canadien au conseil prive.","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Identification (biology); Subject (documents); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.00808376034170533,"score_gpt":0.1947456616631106,"score_spread":0.18666190132140528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001687717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03671457,0.00003415749,0.0003611701,0.5131428,0.000374878,0.00022147194,0.00008080982,0.00014176076,0.44892836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5224563,0.00017559789,0.0007383137,0.00050633075,0.0002886439,6.744102e-7,0.00001749726,0.000017611857,0.47579905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980716,0.0003961581,0.00013531059,0.0004632598,0.00023733481,0.000696298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848354,0.00020552019,0.00014071098,0.00042797686,0.00005275512,0.00068952364],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011707385,0.00021706091,0.00025380167,0.00011110544,0.0014385519,0.00011559684,0.0007756962,0.00024991232,0.0006905793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043583877,0.0002802335,0.00015925682,0.0007798487,0.0010271758,0.0015775322,0.00033616205,0.00031519163,0.00050752395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009625464,0.00006698853,0.004089121,0.000021211004,0.00002987107,0.000021228348,0.0028848469,0.000044050244,9.068095e-7,0.7601534,0.23175958,0.000919153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034008894,0.000053538217,0.004663854,0.00004272029,0.000048861788,3.0023023e-7,0.0046774885,0.00003980167,0.00008777774,0.0026437398,0.9870646,0.000337209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71707433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049766254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75750965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003576259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003592271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7003639676","doi":"","title":"Quinquagenaries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Statutory law; Personal property; Security interest; Common law; Property (philosophy); Uniform Commercial Code; Property law","score_opus":0.0256324685808875,"score_gpt":0.29718113276320457,"score_spread":0.27154866418231705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7003639676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17380498,0.0005246972,0.00018050183,0.01960409,0.0005986479,0.00043817947,0.00007397674,0.00034940828,0.80442554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767264,0.00001753783,0.0002773398,0.0020254918,0.00033832516,0.00015067824,0.000009887368,0.000009365429,0.020444982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989462,0.00013608971,0.00012142212,0.00017941643,0.0003602889,0.0002565647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949354,0.000056485682,0.000045292785,0.00022435817,0.000029842819,0.00015047606],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004546515,0.000060459563,0.000078444355,0.000018308154,0.0026813408,0.00012246578,0.00038420237,0.00002605494,0.0064980704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055387834,0.00006511566,0.00005681949,0.00026519707,0.00019368698,0.00016479095,0.00017575026,0.00021566705,0.0004933672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031977454,0.000035454814,0.00057220267,0.0000013633122,0.0000051043935,0.0000025161248,0.0019952767,0.00004862555,0.000117722,0.985292,0.011470963,0.00045555268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009100497,0.000014693365,0.00029128022,8.9975987e-7,0.0000047922454,6.729137e-7,0.004333318,0.0000085407655,0.00005533883,0.012857876,0.9822478,0.00009374506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013107376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071276478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97243416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012469612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016126009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006030746","doi":"","title":"Sources of Canadian Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03140998783422817,"score_gpt":0.27267507712912253,"score_spread":0.24126508929489437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006030746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114929184,0.00014609566,0.000016115864,0.029605445,0.000064674816,0.00018464352,0.0000532142,0.00006465261,0.854936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99310994,0.00002388906,0.0003040451,0.005080351,0.00033222395,0.000010176038,0.0000038054886,0.000007386171,0.0011281595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924713,0.000044082815,0.00013606568,0.0001477995,0.0001860738,0.00023886985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991553,0.000032731165,0.000046050372,0.00013604079,0.00005258057,0.0005773058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014905247,0.000058493544,0.00010207567,0.000025959913,0.00047816487,0.000069234666,0.00031218003,0.000060449995,0.00083024526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006322098,0.000059058042,0.00005264594,0.0004067662,0.00024046567,0.00013582123,0.000030630777,0.00011678952,0.00041861643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012085244,0.0000064029305,0.0010719243,0.0000043784075,0.00000532797,0.0000014733532,0.0019028411,0.000012252645,0.00013191768,0.9938053,0.0029326375,0.00012433906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070723814,0.000010985972,0.00042633357,0.000004627405,0.000005898115,1.2332366e-7,0.00094440114,0.000009126243,0.00053433026,0.0023936837,0.99552464,0.000075138094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89809173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92753375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040000406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024769705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9090603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006146110","doi":"","title":"Substantial &amp; Punitive Costs Awards Against Self-Represented Litigants","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pretext; Government (linguistics); Punitive damages; Subpoena; Circumstantial evidence; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03568888831418636,"score_gpt":0.2975547040892297,"score_spread":0.2618658157750433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006146110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89612573,0.000032799355,0.00014987458,0.0019932154,0.00020064734,0.0003828073,0.00013899677,0.00020643999,0.10076948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910555,0.000093837574,0.0010019548,0.00017474289,0.0003556339,9.3608537e-7,0.000056129706,0.000021359652,0.0072399154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974654,0.0004096461,0.00020838852,0.00052028254,0.0007877411,0.0006085493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787784,0.00015854459,0.00024731705,0.0005501298,0.000741672,0.00042448443],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010113907,0.00020121656,0.00028886637,0.00021215467,0.0024881233,0.00009014277,0.000993528,0.00029703567,0.001061545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024548892,0.0002562908,0.00020542143,0.0009975043,0.0011903922,0.0009335651,0.00038172954,0.0004006756,0.0010477246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001062339,0.001733566,0.6769163,0.00009673286,0.00094553176,0.00012394639,0.16126972,0.000011810794,0.03911849,0.09873432,0.009967359,0.010019885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021918488,0.0001208727,0.36752698,0.00012331588,0.00016541553,0.0000042876495,0.018793926,0.00003781531,0.0029687705,0.0011472036,0.6061621,0.00075748854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026033404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0190909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59619474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042368897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040475055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006229806","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Common-Law Canada, 4th ed.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Exposition (narrative); Work (physics); Common law","score_opus":0.015633298011375377,"score_gpt":0.2896932775721003,"score_spread":0.2740599795607249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006229806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22061628,0.0015826308,0.000021154066,0.017478162,0.0007734085,0.00039965028,0.000089422145,0.00019994711,0.75883937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98993474,0.0000578447,0.00009214584,0.0017163343,0.00039897827,0.000047005055,0.000009735715,0.000013324818,0.0077298605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987947,0.000077938865,0.00020199372,0.00024846802,0.00032183237,0.00035507345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993789,0.00011540466,0.000023572773,0.00022905468,0.000026140919,0.00022690224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034827855,0.00009525308,0.00013370822,0.00002223293,0.00041399235,0.00024179232,0.00033227843,0.00007576519,0.0006666413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021782133,0.00009368029,0.000044512624,0.0003316182,0.00015406747,0.00023041567,0.000060102964,0.0003011285,0.00034197516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014426561,0.00001672993,0.0008507793,0.000009669883,0.0000056280387,0.000021705704,0.00037533228,0.000018642737,0.000023489942,0.9705116,0.027468644,0.00069632026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079431775,0.0000052814553,0.0013302277,0.000034380028,0.000005379381,7.344061e-7,0.00040916956,0.00007598186,0.00005480809,0.012339619,0.98553425,0.00013074672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97590333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.958172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038667425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078850676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72992545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006360973","doi":"","title":"TEMEIURILE CONSTITUIRII UNEI FIDUCII","year":2024,"lang":"ro","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Order (exchange); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.35134280121299255,"score_gpt":0.6235262749262338,"score_spread":0.27218347371324125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006360973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20270826,0.19138227,0.0011386704,0.013738173,0.008598263,0.002720458,0.0010290537,0.00036080644,0.5783241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483814,0.03856038,0.00012841223,0.0005332639,0.0016064841,0.000089533896,0.000020366742,0.00007439428,0.010605729],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994883,0.00047269,0.0014154728,0.0009663178,0.0013938531,0.00086868554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996452,0.0009128117,0.00073021324,0.00078498357,0.00043887986,0.0006811243],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029295543,0.0005086317,0.00096647505,0.00071816467,0.0015448366,0.00781243,0.0053109895,0.00030653906,0.05494704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046394079,0.0004714285,0.0005009601,0.0032600786,0.001122494,0.0041747615,0.0018220188,0.0009863843,0.0007911091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009064416,0.0008366908,0.04454144,0.0005981765,0.0008725831,0.00019324425,0.0051098634,0.00026671577,0.02075869,0.1513987,0.71982414,0.05550908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002566702,0.000010104333,0.02419892,0.0011437654,0.0002550858,0.000010068939,0.0008941238,0.00024764455,0.0026257217,0.027811175,0.9418583,0.00068845664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009999905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008340576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7456732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000331903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015452673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006430918","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Common-Law Canada, 3rd ed.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.021679072489119627,"score_gpt":0.27901837057808193,"score_spread":0.2573392980889623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006430918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36944246,0.00034292825,0.000026729222,0.07149361,0.0002658269,0.0005152534,0.0000838622,0.00013955212,0.5576898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98772544,0.000025514048,0.00014181228,0.010676787,0.00039347616,0.000031528998,0.000008707687,0.000010756969,0.0009859772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879146,0.00009049544,0.00021625524,0.00023579827,0.00032409676,0.00034189736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992395,0.00007397237,0.000051310773,0.00019324501,0.000034224246,0.0004077346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001951023,0.000094523755,0.00016257679,0.000008782831,0.0004485166,0.00010376309,0.00041925607,0.00007093882,0.00061819825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049900947,0.00009909281,0.000039735176,0.000280203,0.00014605925,0.00018132027,0.000077334305,0.00027247687,0.00025456568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050375197,0.000022393328,0.004132931,0.0000058817527,0.000004620635,0.0000117180225,0.00074784114,0.000041438936,0.000054259122,0.96940565,0.025226645,0.0003416079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019920823,0.000009790228,0.002830203,0.000008420966,0.0000041646886,2.2662961e-7,0.0006835665,0.000054537966,0.00010985658,0.0030358604,0.9929213,0.00014284976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.957588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99434274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96769464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002063598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053161854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6768837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006491626","doi":"","title":"Trusts in Common-Law Canada, 2nd ed.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.015211561266571822,"score_gpt":0.27647345750171926,"score_spread":0.26126189623514745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006491626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4968903,0.00021102978,0.000029972802,0.024843981,0.00033992503,0.0003676287,0.00008211408,0.00008357045,0.47715145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902952,0.000042977983,0.00009216211,0.0018021538,0.00028417484,0.00004149702,0.0000026907637,0.000010278961,0.0074288645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987704,0.00009439067,0.00020985804,0.00022231229,0.0003114258,0.0003916114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920523,0.00014215594,0.00005485445,0.00028955264,0.000041502808,0.00026672982],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032567186,0.00009284094,0.00014333331,0.000015331485,0.0004489916,0.000071246075,0.0003878447,0.000077316996,0.0009768526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045863373,0.00007285254,0.00003631636,0.0001694224,0.00022232608,0.00023487156,0.000064068445,0.0001374608,0.00026203966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003449605,0.00002548759,0.006619076,0.0000021958494,0.0000037855025,0.0000060925595,0.00015860893,0.0000022562554,0.00014439254,0.9773528,0.014401697,0.001280167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002652935,0.0000064926644,0.0071497005,0.000023795748,0.0000031192358,4.076554e-7,0.0002111049,0.0000023837838,0.00022119858,0.01140039,0.9805759,0.00014020212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96575457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99803066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037468236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000498704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70070498","doi":"","title":"No Presumptions! Joint Custody in the British Columbia Court of Appeal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Appeal; Law; High Court; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Legal guardian; Joint (building); Law of the case; Court of record; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Engineering","score_opus":0.05972135360740332,"score_gpt":0.2873809353122113,"score_spread":0.227659581704808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70070498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20830995,0.000014510864,0.000073199815,0.0004431374,0.00003655129,0.0002652429,0.000007854579,0.00001977722,0.7908298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98155373,0.00004406872,0.00044396502,0.00014719943,0.000053719672,0.000037542617,0.0000012707194,0.0000022692163,0.01771624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994516,0.000061985185,0.0001344769,0.00008148155,0.00015294176,0.0001175217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997345,0.00002498171,0.00003749829,0.00012159112,0.000052803538,0.00002859481],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047071048,0.000021091077,0.0000553628,0.0000060853404,0.00035156126,0.00014904763,0.00021813324,0.000032848893,0.0015509146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038046768,0.000023318638,0.000031120762,0.00012440076,0.00015904185,0.000074822085,0.000025797144,0.0000642681,0.00009215646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068050695,0.0012521534,0.14214721,0.000030101788,0.000022126975,0.0000073989736,0.034190938,0.0000039192055,0.00026079058,0.47771978,0.33428237,0.0100764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016650103,0.000021665574,0.47312385,0.000016341875,0.000007429479,0.0000012874744,0.005044743,0.000038668815,0.000011738762,0.006494845,0.5149838,0.00008916527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5706883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6673604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7732438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014946668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057070243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008687290","doi":"","title":"The common law doctrine of aboriginal title in the New Zealand and Canadian courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchArchive–Te Puna Rangahau (Victoria University of Wellington)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Doctrine; High Court; Statutory law; Legislation","score_opus":0.014419500423538772,"score_gpt":0.29927820734134586,"score_spread":0.28485870691780707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008687290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.265213,0.00037105574,0.00015008623,0.07314739,0.00036457597,0.0009408679,0.00015504069,0.000024263358,0.6596337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988602,0.00088853686,0.00007906106,0.000040209467,0.00023553407,2.3446185e-7,0.000003342023,0.0000033190618,0.010147786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992785,0.00012931194,0.00006626034,0.00008809534,0.0002323687,0.00020547917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937356,0.0002590588,0.000035204015,0.00014873737,0.00005780251,0.00012561274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060549565,0.000040689174,0.00007384605,0.000053198946,0.0005353267,0.000024076968,0.00040895116,0.000029723406,0.00013933335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013193004,0.00003111355,0.000025700654,0.0001581924,0.0007873613,0.000061423125,0.000030784136,0.00014457337,0.00003638295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039182898,0.000014178439,0.00081688893,0.0000053438603,0.00001050299,0.0000037342784,0.01305498,8.548591e-7,0.000076391516,0.9686451,0.015780512,0.001552353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016875341,0.000025437972,0.0012264135,0.000009287165,0.0000045600354,2.928782e-7,0.0009723233,0.00003709456,0.00006341032,0.011851526,0.9856079,0.00003300732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55660224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6993686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96982735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040651932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000395029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44635037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009908890","doi":"","title":"Frustration of Contract","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Frustration; Frustration of purpose; Force majeure; Intervention (counseling); Subject (documents); Doctrine","score_opus":0.018871944019572588,"score_gpt":0.31312658891202805,"score_spread":0.29425464489245545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009908890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20767497,0.00016498312,0.0005325088,0.0073250635,0.00017699975,0.0002809672,0.000014888163,0.00006667155,0.78376293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115115,0.000025480815,0.0003138958,0.00048841827,0.00010369203,0.000018303243,0.0000036528697,0.000002385178,0.007893016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944025,0.000045632525,0.00015109319,0.00010514685,0.00013498375,0.00012288218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995923,0.00007109703,0.00005314272,0.00014763884,0.00007569821,0.000060138624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026275744,0.000042129035,0.000081553415,0.000018671988,0.00027007327,0.000050261624,0.00016123545,0.000061464816,0.00039376746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010212443,0.000041765557,0.000043112675,0.00019494408,0.00012792519,0.0001505714,0.000018229148,0.00008940192,0.00007843106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028408551,0.000029470213,0.0019381208,0.000004439683,0.000006426079,1.825316e-7,0.00018085701,0.000004608006,0.0009857463,0.9940548,0.0016643017,0.0011282378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018060596,0.000008915171,0.010134402,0.000019496832,0.000012823593,5.497733e-8,0.0003977071,0.000019017847,0.0024668823,0.029944807,0.95675135,0.00006392439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014020131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013902655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96410996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038233582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017786684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010788264","doi":"","title":"Justifying the application of the theory of efficient breach specifically within the context of commercial contracting.&#13;\\n","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Goldcorp","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Limiting; Frame (networking); Meaning (existential); Derogation; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.0284670752440129,"score_gpt":0.2569778250280782,"score_spread":0.2285107497840653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010788264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724191,0.0001945314,0.0029575694,0.0047193933,0.00023221214,0.0013069274,0.0006961175,0.000028288076,0.017445872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957984,0.00028177197,0.00049113546,0.000032345204,0.0000618466,4.8817004e-8,0.00007009934,0.000013961799,0.0032503924],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734366,0.0007571509,0.00040359146,0.0003644037,0.00086425774,0.0002669113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936562,0.0015060334,0.002607064,0.0009821369,0.001164964,0.00008359204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017113441,0.0002633885,0.0007205298,0.00017224024,0.0016983192,0.000010039334,0.003470718,0.00047584984,0.00022701692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018241678,0.00021460804,0.0006551697,0.0008264776,0.004821089,0.00014402575,0.0004595705,0.00077978463,0.000003525009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046320646,0.002051695,0.0045396406,0.0008549333,0.0013494033,0.000004449179,0.79120815,0.0027294904,0.0052842656,0.1559115,0.0021669203,0.029267466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010814873,0.00015086328,0.032643687,0.00047304903,0.0011970857,0.0000010842703,0.94042563,0.0007883827,0.0005728504,0.00044089404,0.021951146,0.0002738628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0400443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09397758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15547061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011691788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062309613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011110991","doi":"","title":"Legislation, Magistrates, and Judges: High Law and Low Law in England and the Empire","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Common law; Comparative law; Public law; Legislation; Legal history; Israeli law; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.013252846826782601,"score_gpt":0.26727592349472873,"score_spread":0.2540230766679461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011110991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8420214,0.0012382857,0.000009599577,0.02712524,0.00004107528,0.00042496732,0.000025271458,0.00004850373,0.12906562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952271,0.00030361168,0.00024356287,0.0029693842,0.0002560759,0.000034628436,0.000006732104,0.000008250776,0.00095067476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990664,0.000120493394,0.00018556189,0.0002449253,0.00016400806,0.00021857659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994049,0.00018782009,0.000055149554,0.00017632931,0.000038149374,0.00013764622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060273486,0.000105729276,0.00015000145,0.000013191587,0.000746327,0.0003541569,0.00012712798,0.000083815234,0.000065209984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004410464,0.00007837356,0.00001855996,0.00011129364,0.0010512606,0.00041910354,0.00006104098,0.0001845724,0.000018703748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009813458,0.000019372465,0.0076983827,0.0000052338505,0.000005438713,9.550527e-7,0.0022873518,0.0000064072547,0.00001630314,0.9891018,0.00012508755,0.0007238413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016456681,0.000012208909,0.019689007,0.000016867489,0.000013166276,0.0000024289843,0.00044970057,0.00008066193,0.000033888584,0.039079476,0.9388217,0.00015527643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050654944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39603895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95002234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030265648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040623872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95566684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011427815","doi":"","title":"Lost Synergies and M&amp;A Damages: Considering Cineplex v Cineworld","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UCL Discovery (University College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Shareholder; Database transaction; Structuring; Reliability (semiconductor); Economic Justice; Transaction cost; Limiting","score_opus":0.023943980501535293,"score_gpt":0.2468295458419001,"score_spread":0.2228855653403648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011427815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88972074,0.0001815483,0.00050749735,0.011619981,0.00022573114,0.0003998014,0.00089557923,0.00011962925,0.09632951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8704072,0.00013081939,0.00034209384,0.00031117693,0.000079856276,0.000002810829,0.000020293724,0.000010559767,0.12869515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881226,0.00013667339,0.00010175534,0.0003226932,0.00032434563,0.0003022668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999294,0.00019433103,0.00008128284,0.00025469874,0.000041795145,0.00013390393],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024151179,0.000119748256,0.00017277859,0.00015363391,0.0027742223,0.00009173803,0.00035755252,0.000038732454,0.0010468165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042960597,0.00015089901,0.00007501966,0.00072079315,0.0003250458,0.000835046,0.00063363696,0.00022143149,0.00004326124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006270159,0.00008768382,0.0037230037,0.000016058984,0.000042976848,0.00007764524,0.004618848,0.00032427564,0.0004328595,0.9563287,0.034118634,0.00016661883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005053818,0.000023337383,0.0035864648,0.0000075202906,0.000034108354,0.000007776469,0.046071947,0.0001033688,0.000006838486,0.0011844798,0.9482484,0.00022041363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042378106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010211986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9551442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023697891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024993595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7012834978","doi":"","title":"Betterment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Property (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Offset (computer science)","score_opus":0.030021937429469354,"score_gpt":0.32135388121977515,"score_spread":0.2913319437903058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7012834978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18395956,0.000047831018,0.0000716568,0.025541453,0.00030064984,0.00022731248,0.000012412059,0.00009115751,0.78974795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821892,0.000028887072,0.0004272124,0.0013291158,0.0006820808,0.000036852012,0.0000022131103,0.000006776756,0.015297674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923563,0.000031512398,0.00010114559,0.00016849683,0.00022137114,0.0002418416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913234,0.000020554304,0.000082280014,0.00053960946,0.000036591824,0.00018862652],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028922808,0.00006080757,0.00007678523,0.000008288701,0.0026857478,0.00048673153,0.0006075091,0.00005262011,0.0007168304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086247,0.00005809337,0.000052515756,0.000026536018,0.0002829035,0.00031526183,0.00011057208,0.000114472445,0.0013406203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001350735,0.000025720738,0.004502343,0.0000019841366,0.000005826804,0.000002293119,0.0003741651,0.0000010365366,0.00018031202,0.9863024,0.0065122633,0.0020903586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011540876,0.000005950245,0.016241217,0.000006872745,0.0000051772245,1.7228423e-7,0.00012556877,0.0000036092888,0.00019485655,0.009958026,0.9732554,0.00008775429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01524738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012915531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97634435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059265007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006954248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014848435","doi":"","title":"'Recognisable Psychiatric Injury' and Tortious Compensability for Pure Mental Harm Claims in Negligence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Scrutiny; Harm; Supreme court; Meaning (existential); Statutory law; Liability","score_opus":0.06093486466495489,"score_gpt":0.3816917284237612,"score_spread":0.3207568637588063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014848435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70498884,0.000474677,0.000021024725,0.0077390955,0.00052432285,0.004798177,0.23325765,0.00026248826,0.04793376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996463,0.0000083695195,0.00026295072,0.00024840905,0.0003313603,0.00029793096,0.0021407576,0.0000064194523,0.00024083036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993006,0.000026756514,0.00013246859,0.00021741287,0.00010781844,0.00021496427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960417,0.000065304004,0.000048601058,0.00011903582,0.00008018203,0.00008269796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011076608,0.00006139212,0.00008083685,0.000023086317,0.000458181,0.00007653948,0.0001688895,0.0000663538,0.015461579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015728641,0.000063912186,0.000029995821,0.00021773482,0.00004653299,0.00014232981,0.000056139634,0.000066607856,0.00030495983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010141699,0.00041317803,0.010640778,0.0001939028,0.00001657648,6.712197e-7,0.013478689,0.0000020505474,0.00018585226,0.015471014,0.88898844,0.07050744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023677715,0.00008725447,0.014170571,0.00007168114,0.000004267745,3.6578666e-7,0.00083167764,0.00024466234,0.00030419743,0.0068096356,0.9770604,0.00017855199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025792216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042754225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29147416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064363056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009491789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015071583","doi":"","title":"Rose-Colored Glasses, Opaque Financial Reporting, and Investor Blues: Enron as Con and the Vulnerability of Canadian Corporate Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Corporate governance; Corporate law; Investor protection","score_opus":0.04650038236576022,"score_gpt":0.27918585321462214,"score_spread":0.23268547084886193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015071583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8913415,0.0003848485,0.0000022605225,0.005758332,0.00009653667,0.00053041923,0.000035016914,0.000033148863,0.10181794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637246,0.00015284236,0.00017132504,0.0014716131,0.00016202385,0.000057981095,0.0000050359517,0.000008900763,0.0015978271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984555,0.00023239043,0.0005076436,0.00029506217,0.00021369524,0.0002956742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843717,0.0001579312,0.0006090079,0.00029487853,0.00012031707,0.0003806938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014686382,0.00011609383,0.00025304535,0.00003590571,0.0010501986,0.00015346312,0.00019289978,0.000129412,0.00017853254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014223794,0.0000928852,0.00004819729,0.00029742543,0.0016266811,0.00022156708,0.000053447187,0.00024164135,0.000020420714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012051233,0.0000214587,0.0076024644,0.000011085931,0.0000064434066,0.0000047662083,0.0019278112,0.0000027992326,0.000111901,0.9888329,0.0012286677,0.00023763611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000970803,0.000071263064,0.032458615,0.00002998973,0.000036426005,0.000007747712,0.0008102827,0.00010818558,0.00050507224,0.06391543,0.9008208,0.0002654077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8252609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9180752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92491746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095581876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033969886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8077385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015575355","doi":"","title":"The Symbiosis between Criminal Codes and the Common Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Criminal code; Code (set theory); Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Public law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.030965250057340226,"score_gpt":0.3087707060466157,"score_spread":0.2778054559892755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015575355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60980606,0.0022368582,0.00004401706,0.030798236,0.00022654189,0.00058781245,0.00003934819,0.000107632106,0.35615346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662185,0.0001519673,0.00007734485,0.0011825716,0.00075097283,0.000053144926,0.0000031295845,0.0000075385396,0.0011514556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988778,0.0002589034,0.00015476742,0.000114631264,0.00024298456,0.0003509138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987064,0.00073189364,0.00006368346,0.00027001064,0.000036105714,0.0001918821],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013879341,0.00008276728,0.00012324403,0.0000052799646,0.00310213,0.00031996152,0.00038080898,0.00006120394,0.0000502433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060720497,0.00004664438,0.00005741209,0.00009976505,0.0013360156,0.00023750446,0.00011377313,0.00020721486,0.00013436879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005645287,0.0000110900955,0.010316964,0.0000024608596,0.000012631107,6.8882805e-8,0.0017350992,1.1479259e-7,0.000009943199,0.98627424,0.00081344723,0.0008182877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025674672,0.000008285167,0.014685353,0.000008239242,0.000068188434,6.10167e-7,0.002880728,0.0000033172819,0.00016984376,0.02557387,0.956237,0.00010778962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026373442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019576667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003381453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026760787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015715054","doi":"","title":"A Truly \"National\" Plumbing Code","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Commission; Building code","score_opus":0.053482952685174556,"score_gpt":0.3482611693992163,"score_spread":0.29477821671404175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015715054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064750455,0.000006964791,0.00049038837,0.014701925,0.000040170537,0.00007512865,0.000004986416,0.00006175216,0.91986823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98559165,0.0000352671,0.0009826934,0.00055851205,0.00024204288,0.00001911335,0.0000019956394,0.0000033555707,0.012565342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994764,0.000020943633,0.000063840766,0.000085066866,0.00022767144,0.00012612811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997673,0.000041913692,0.0000212463,0.000058251895,0.0000569356,0.00005433403],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022901615,0.000026637525,0.00003496437,0.00001546841,0.00034490373,0.00004674192,0.00012410824,0.000026208614,0.0010741551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007768394,0.000027821417,0.000023441107,0.00015859609,0.00005928294,0.00008456475,0.00001590072,0.000046234585,0.00024248738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001279124,0.000024336281,0.0010688669,6.430652e-7,0.0000027854094,7.9218694e-7,0.0016401962,0.000007653916,0.0015616943,0.98044676,0.010162543,0.0050824736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006178141,0.000002249665,0.0016077221,0.0000018687452,0.0000015718089,4.716663e-7,0.00030050392,0.00013107731,0.000027930593,0.076901585,0.9209222,0.000041032974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031782407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010963453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9208412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055624547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009664642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018362801","doi":"","title":"A Defense of Pure Restitution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Triacetin; Hyporeflexia; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.02058712355330489,"score_gpt":0.2602973650451714,"score_spread":0.23971024149186654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018362801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016493436,0.000054207267,0.00013058294,0.000102793354,0.00024226263,0.00025547095,0.000034243625,0.00005520925,0.9826318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11258014,0.000090922986,0.00043539895,0.000017904542,0.0001940333,0.0000011407317,0.00010623077,0.000013159296,0.8865611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990742,0.00008021571,0.00013754547,0.00025173536,0.0002598046,0.0001965068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992585,0.000025564526,0.00021290273,0.00019326634,0.00021621326,0.00009355778],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011105628,0.00012684856,0.00017189886,0.000098710545,0.0003922703,0.00003304771,0.00038778782,0.00028927572,0.03749696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031241132,0.00014678294,0.00011431796,0.00051986845,0.00018434116,0.00016261861,0.000037376343,0.0001569241,0.00013211888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022376726,0.00012854743,0.0005209027,0.00017101395,0.000099604746,0.000022373555,0.018731741,0.000009165865,0.0002746084,0.78720915,0.006650341,0.18595877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016756514,0.000025376537,0.00035512325,0.00008337027,0.000079480196,1.8873803e-7,0.014967416,0.000004752303,0.00014493336,0.00089390704,0.9831243,0.00015356754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001883419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03304406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013786388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035869746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98460037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018607868","doi":"","title":"3 Dividend Stocks for the Second Quarter -- The Motley Fool","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Motley; Dividend; Quarter (Canadian coin); Stock (firearms)","score_opus":0.04373798872365776,"score_gpt":0.3504164148600884,"score_spread":0.30667842613643065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018607868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000021730418,0.00037732872,0.0025584444,0.01529582,0.00028460237,0.0011645817,0.00012424824,0.00006571308,0.9801271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051531773,0.000069766495,0.00007154712,0.00060399127,0.001625607,0.00034872044,0.0000038935336,0.000060253347,0.99206305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993666,0.00003180823,0.000072143004,0.00016333179,0.00016736804,0.00019879406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998921,0.0002816984,0.0001328398,0.0005992848,0.00002485583,0.00004034556],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035055284,0.00009753406,0.00009852468,0.000013549081,0.00134187,0.00028010365,0.00097194436,0.00013383914,0.009701378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045968332,0.00004526546,0.00011310377,0.000028067516,0.00028710617,0.000035600144,0.00005842632,0.00012235953,0.00022550322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.648032e-7,0.0000045971997,0.0000064034316,0.0000042335746,0.000025352683,3.2959914e-8,0.0007373985,5.6759358e-8,4.66387e-7,0.11178039,0.88467705,0.0027635626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059493887,0.0000053563585,0.00006242398,0.000009491788,0.000022064418,5.864654e-8,0.0008298112,0.000010362433,0.0000012221315,0.0022107058,0.9967061,0.00008289517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060211956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17596437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16994317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017930473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094252726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018915029","doi":"","title":"Ettinger Estate v. Jewish Quarter Company","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Appeal; Supreme court; Legislation; Compensation (psychology); Punitive damages; Borough; Quarter (Canadian coin); Financial compensation; Bankruptcy","score_opus":0.019890890614053212,"score_gpt":0.28934166778305964,"score_spread":0.26945077716900645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018915029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4134145,0.00017247218,0.00065662316,0.021885421,0.00036353734,0.00045142305,0.000026351836,0.00037372974,0.5626559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353004,0.00003528418,0.0014860524,0.0018194134,0.00050146796,0.000040142226,0.000007434717,0.000014147595,0.0025660016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876183,0.00006471053,0.00020375461,0.00025578038,0.00030996738,0.00040394886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992431,0.00004971343,0.00007117073,0.0002829925,0.00007542024,0.0002775958],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036226952,0.00010817166,0.00013208849,0.000021781492,0.0008042904,0.00023139201,0.00033082004,0.000081547485,0.00048621168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004967834,0.000105903404,0.00008288879,0.00022532277,0.00023967975,0.00031923768,0.00004671645,0.0002284497,0.0020814354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035589562,0.00008932214,0.0011443405,0.000005601845,0.000012206556,0.0000056609038,0.0033603068,0.00009973567,0.00032544296,0.98879457,0.004182964,0.0019763056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038762926,0.000018370609,0.0030936634,0.000018197548,0.0000109555895,0.0000010453266,0.0010249104,0.0000072309826,0.00024461007,0.030287104,0.96470773,0.00019854783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014096363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018016743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001293694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015667235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019176702","doi":"","title":"The Flaws of Magic Bullet Theory: Retraining Unconscionability to Discretely Target Different Contexts of Unfairness in Contracts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Common law; Proposition; Jurisprudence; Rationalisation; Circumstantial evidence","score_opus":0.017099792195740485,"score_gpt":0.28921647405396905,"score_spread":0.27211668185822857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019176702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95814246,0.000288682,0.00011350254,0.009836716,0.00022079202,0.00087058824,0.00016644022,0.000029500856,0.030331321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982664,0.000011652075,0.00010218385,0.00033206487,0.000058033722,0.00014265152,0.00000832626,0.000009884509,0.0010687828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773926,0.0007359227,0.0004371764,0.0002627774,0.0004981275,0.00032675613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982747,0.0008876167,0.0001908199,0.00038573638,0.00010312577,0.00015798949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025575804,0.00011144941,0.0002696042,0.000032590164,0.0007190592,0.000046390356,0.0006148592,0.00004564178,0.00073017826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006723033,0.00008500495,0.00009936862,0.00036695442,0.00050086953,0.00008750572,0.00022275966,0.00031468968,0.000010318863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009094621,0.00010918278,0.0071944036,0.000007902121,0.000013031091,0.0000010042938,0.0034975605,0.000113338676,0.00044776814,0.98755765,0.00033445435,0.00063273066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011361364,0.00020277937,0.072581664,0.000053313244,0.000024655135,9.692887e-7,0.022899706,0.00009444032,0.001338487,0.28490824,0.6163877,0.0003719024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005901544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016166192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7026494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017771838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002094165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9021114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019438634","doi":"","title":"A generous interpretation of collateral","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Collateral; Creditor; Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Security interest; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.04903484428553077,"score_gpt":0.34887173174082864,"score_spread":0.29983688745529785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019438634","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010571578,0.00045589797,0.00004403189,0.00057452876,0.00033650125,0.0013492357,0.7514489,0.000065045926,0.24466865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069251,0.00006298899,0.00025055048,0.0001919579,0.00031899477,0.0008053316,0.08259747,0.000013389814,0.008834249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980489,0.00015286871,0.0006072166,0.0005184901,0.00037627824,0.000296263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981038,0.00020964492,0.0005732775,0.0005014715,0.0004970472,0.00011476613],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011146228,0.00024591357,0.0004017104,0.00010471101,0.00029191544,0.00015072453,0.00092861615,0.0004405508,0.14500766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003860739,0.00026994172,0.00030776468,0.0004981387,0.00004015255,0.00011290179,0.0010052142,0.00038136452,0.0009573729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013371836,0.00063050486,0.00012643766,0.0067873728,0.00059354765,0.0000072358944,0.092020534,0.015191253,0.00016515945,0.010722617,0.6929312,0.18069042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022069499,0.000038569015,0.0005405328,0.008557886,0.00007695215,4.911989e-7,0.00095496443,0.018052226,0.00052584964,0.0014109508,0.9691623,0.00045858335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010182117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005940672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9058679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018434813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011316586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019757246","doi":"","title":"Imputing a common intention in single ownership cases","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yardstick; Entitlement (fair division); Doctrine; Common law; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.06213116781615939,"score_gpt":0.2897732245317526,"score_spread":0.22764205671559318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019757246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9308819,0.0009804062,0.0034413491,0.0075967396,0.00014697733,0.0006351859,0.00019080042,0.00016279412,0.055963803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961218,0.00009751565,0.0018654586,0.00017241256,0.0001685808,8.6151476e-7,0.000083934916,0.000012604181,0.0014768258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806845,0.00044227298,0.0002498829,0.00036962779,0.00042084092,0.00044893092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868363,0.0002979836,0.000255158,0.00025755246,0.00018159719,0.000324084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010086662,0.0001643291,0.00028167368,0.00032529834,0.0003728618,0.000040377963,0.00072339573,0.00028173547,0.00003084836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029195356,0.00018519392,0.00012885181,0.0010064974,0.00052802404,0.0006821747,0.00027508297,0.0008967521,0.000030555973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005971097,0.00051363907,0.2439888,0.00014909817,0.000110729015,0.00035470995,0.3440189,0.00008099068,0.0034008613,0.35238644,0.011857349,0.042541377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005594015,0.000947837,0.13811432,0.0020716854,0.0002390431,0.00012489203,0.24536236,0.002648484,0.00018873662,0.13512328,0.46778038,0.0018049794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012637881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020393591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45592302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020810621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018536873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020378624","doi":"","title":"The Law of Trusts: A Contextual Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Trust law; Express trust; Key (lock); Constructive trust; Context (archaeology); Common law","score_opus":0.026206157892218668,"score_gpt":0.29233336329937054,"score_spread":0.26612720540715185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020378624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028471278,0.0010070662,0.00025006093,0.0060974085,0.00014343852,0.00024746286,0.000028693485,0.00006087349,0.96369374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777217,0.00009592882,0.00061803235,0.0007843643,0.0002617409,0.00004615481,0.00000692025,0.000007945136,0.01040672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892485,0.00015043725,0.00020088044,0.00018411726,0.00029708492,0.00024264338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913055,0.00018081088,0.00007374374,0.0003372589,0.00014839733,0.00012922521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048382627,0.00006940843,0.00012271297,0.0000055327564,0.0009878897,0.00014697971,0.00034676146,0.00006835195,0.000195662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000151001,0.000052946532,0.00009035365,0.0002293414,0.00056142267,0.00013388458,0.00008235738,0.00016852035,0.00009896257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036006434,0.0000510512,0.000101184174,0.00000406413,0.0000133520325,0.000001020639,0.00073549134,0.000004273681,0.0001957764,0.9969385,0.0013885706,0.00056310435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017561762,0.000007888158,0.0001812504,0.000006507538,0.000010133327,0.0000010663778,0.0054596895,0.000017499482,0.00066497456,0.011381486,0.9820162,0.00007766014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009349119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025013894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050727012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019794314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020593912","doi":"","title":"Litigation privilege: transient or timeless? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Adversarial system; Governor; Blank","score_opus":0.027250831146428043,"score_gpt":0.3244106227569039,"score_spread":0.29715979161047584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020593912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40219256,0.000017392163,0.0050021005,0.006263632,0.00019042882,0.0003350699,0.000023937566,0.000038228936,0.58593667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879199,0.0000073506535,0.0005789559,0.00041174702,0.00012084402,0.0000037849272,0.0000044552585,0.0000034194275,0.010949543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992721,0.000017325265,0.00017865322,0.00009454977,0.00026529195,0.00017206447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995675,0.00011213554,0.000049755,0.000098295,0.00007658373,0.00009569925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003194297,0.000042881777,0.00006837738,0.000015512518,0.00017028447,0.00001472561,0.00011944481,0.00003542753,0.00067225815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002972754,0.00003358463,0.000020362239,0.00016916289,0.00007930197,0.000058325146,0.000009154565,0.000041047446,0.000009033306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004716363,0.00016028697,0.0012529751,0.00009112258,0.00002436175,0.00000943207,0.014584394,0.000029547096,0.0016942739,0.942426,0.022313578,0.017366856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014680368,0.000018918523,0.009743342,0.000011028357,0.00002845661,4.3860362e-7,0.0071738856,0.000047633905,0.0034299612,0.0001767766,0.97912264,0.00010013634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.470375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96366954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95680904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008566965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006566824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7360755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020606427","doi":"","title":"Mere [in The McGill Companion to Law, Special Issue]","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Interpretation (philosophy); Feature (linguistics); Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.03657228997801501,"score_gpt":0.3048429299953126,"score_spread":0.2682706400172976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020606427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031896185,0.000036008438,0.000022854972,0.16619611,0.00024483292,0.0006261832,0.00009448609,0.00008711603,0.8007962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655755,0.000012742035,0.00028162455,0.027980782,0.0049479487,0.000041771393,0.0000057743623,0.000009484285,0.0011443786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988147,0.00014746198,0.00017372344,0.0002392488,0.0003503133,0.0002745518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994081,0.00007531351,0.000037475154,0.00020146715,0.000036617894,0.00024099872],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034553188,0.00008835133,0.00012435133,0.000010514668,0.0007352832,0.000113515096,0.00056788744,0.00005789797,0.0015086719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007682038,0.000071309325,0.000058330297,0.00039023155,0.000113824295,0.00018031393,0.000078982914,0.00021742137,0.0029713188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056415815,0.000030302517,0.00015492209,0.0000028390082,0.0000026734128,0.0000029534801,0.0034376774,0.000028146067,0.00008582803,0.93265915,0.06302441,0.00056548335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012732713,0.00001984264,0.00095178507,0.0000059189224,0.0000047843523,2.257936e-7,0.0021997285,0.000011239059,0.00007637297,0.0028321603,0.9936671,0.00010348243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01715762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047203273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057599682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035374655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7022530492","doi":"","title":"Chevron Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Deference; Agency (philosophy); Statute; Statutory law; Normative; Doctrine","score_opus":0.028880883348728258,"score_gpt":0.30944697148168826,"score_spread":0.28056608813296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7022530492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08248487,0.0002506173,0.00032540192,0.044777874,0.00015809623,0.00033546204,0.000019916086,0.00033571376,0.871312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879178,0.000042680786,0.00056571193,0.005767361,0.0009046881,0.000026933287,0.000005171685,0.0000103008015,0.004759345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991134,0.0000512548,0.00013050162,0.0002131258,0.00024309658,0.00024861144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935025,0.00003280284,0.000041950807,0.00016278794,0.000040810395,0.00037139497],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001679958,0.00007303882,0.00009662557,0.000007336872,0.0005092387,0.00012688074,0.0003245174,0.00006747604,0.0018629867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011123644,0.00007247459,0.000061940744,0.00022561388,0.0001372188,0.00020521642,0.00006220197,0.00017379242,0.0028193302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043455652,0.000022625529,0.0006827169,0.000005522978,0.000006680002,0.0000020520297,0.0020698493,0.000011071324,0.0008515381,0.9776161,0.01765261,0.0010749168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121530546,0.000013169043,0.00094922946,0.0000037056284,0.000005864873,1.2324756e-7,0.0005135039,0.00002948709,0.00029737517,0.002304239,0.9956586,0.00010321184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005813232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029507098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97800595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047221518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010295973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025017645","doi":"","title":"Some Confusion about Discretion in the New British Columbia Wills, Estates and Succession Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Confusion; Discretion; Action (physics); Succession planning","score_opus":0.009774593605839885,"score_gpt":0.2679978556771017,"score_spread":0.25822326207126184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025017645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97663224,0.0004547882,0.00014681743,0.0070633586,0.000120071825,0.00041322116,0.000012585575,0.00006066422,0.015096266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99329126,0.00058190787,0.00014231476,0.0010420949,0.00039734258,0.000024252022,0.000015928592,0.000007989128,0.004496927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989161,0.0001993643,0.00016725957,0.00022111881,0.00026231763,0.00023382113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944675,0.00013379475,0.000068776775,0.00016971171,0.000027776245,0.00015321356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069226604,0.00006297397,0.00010851515,0.000010706491,0.0008426051,0.0010269762,0.00026135787,0.00008274727,0.00026786068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011616828,0.00006587409,0.00003096753,0.00016014276,0.0002006763,0.00048164043,0.000047103844,0.00019993313,0.000037672955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021129692,0.00027271986,0.12750399,0.00005165435,0.000013163362,0.000010114223,0.008651836,0.000033113392,0.0013449149,0.68777215,0.047484245,0.126841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037391557,0.000027437842,0.15491419,0.00009275764,0.000007882641,0.000001898442,0.0006751709,0.00010274676,0.000021892438,0.035643686,0.807988,0.00015047195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4564709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6563739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7605037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035727495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008201089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99031544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025156857","doi":"","title":"Undue influence: Towards a unifying concept of unconscionability?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Commonwealth; Parliament; Legislature; Function (biology); Normative; English law","score_opus":0.016533442201894004,"score_gpt":0.27914767181072614,"score_spread":0.26261422960883213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025156857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92325145,0.0008010121,0.007913467,0.008132499,0.00016247705,0.00088268006,0.0012168764,0.00016278418,0.05747675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99348766,0.00016619936,0.0041461405,0.00023873194,0.00029493097,9.730119e-7,0.000054041142,0.000013051774,0.0015982636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780464,0.00036270698,0.0003292256,0.00046860366,0.0005800863,0.0004547476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979062,0.0002835296,0.00038816867,0.000457957,0.0006757645,0.00028838668],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075650145,0.0002003345,0.00037620825,0.00024800713,0.0008170747,0.000023782652,0.0012172498,0.00037032663,0.00025732807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027158868,0.00022339275,0.0001992589,0.0012396219,0.0036933231,0.00074450317,0.00037593712,0.00079393253,0.000029748127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024121122,0.00016409202,0.026885174,0.00016142566,0.00018856522,0.000015591188,0.2408447,0.000031275053,0.0068509877,0.69943154,0.005198666,0.019986782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002366577,0.00067924807,0.13611346,0.0010629969,0.00027428995,0.000016433984,0.052254952,0.0004585028,0.0015794812,0.13935289,0.6647173,0.0011238274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006468793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040016966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65951866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100462436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058620604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027145257","doi":"","title":"Canadian Personal Property Security Law, 3rd ed","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Statutory law; Security interest; Personal account; Personally identifiable information","score_opus":0.02268995271509505,"score_gpt":0.2823208848430548,"score_spread":0.25963093212795973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027145257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19702984,0.00008498935,0.0000033613778,0.034545414,0.00035448655,0.0005538472,0.00015945044,0.0004080638,0.76686054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96999216,0.00003691101,0.00005517875,0.0023000166,0.0005957075,0.00007808101,0.00003108707,0.000014950491,0.026895914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985755,0.000089109286,0.00014692996,0.00028238323,0.00034025617,0.0005658163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989527,0.000034352026,0.000035237408,0.0002144675,0.00008563493,0.0006775991],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051141577,0.000103368686,0.00012192839,0.000038052334,0.0016026009,0.00022294554,0.00032963356,0.00011443249,0.001522673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008158587,0.00008409873,0.00008112254,0.00043856856,0.00023829259,0.0002405802,0.000059032478,0.00024770148,0.0042403704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023351272,0.000021250677,0.0013670792,0.000008480764,0.000011914181,0.000012533781,0.0038891553,0.0000032549813,0.00009242257,0.93508863,0.05914039,0.0003625173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011276666,0.000008493397,0.0013143689,0.000009471699,0.000006253554,4.580966e-7,0.001389115,0.000096443066,0.00004339763,0.00621535,0.99064934,0.00015456155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9090402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9659187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9315089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030840523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007217941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027322764","doi":"","title":"1967 Chap. 0807. An Act Authorizing The County Commissioners Of Norfolk County To Acquire Land And To Borrow Money For The Purpose Of Providing Parking Facilities For The Norfolk County Registry Of Deeds.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"County government; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Borough; Quarter (Canadian coin); Pie chart; Legislation","score_opus":0.014501409077039345,"score_gpt":0.25687945120625005,"score_spread":0.2423780421292107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027322764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30012318,0.08046756,0.014238318,0.06507388,0.003376334,0.063785866,0.072917975,0.002045644,0.3979712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67407686,0.0044975337,0.0023753776,0.0005894179,0.001030239,0.0013798486,0.0005769857,0.00078943354,0.3146843],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961074,0.00036288155,0.0011164605,0.0006939951,0.0008094715,0.0009097743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560463,0.0013616823,0.0015211642,0.001178459,0.00011296565,0.0002211054],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000998097,0.00053024694,0.0008773565,0.00018480772,0.0010313626,0.00031438106,0.0019089695,0.00026699697,0.000026303393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007183364,0.0003398037,0.00029996256,0.00056485797,0.0009607795,0.0010220303,0.00031587225,0.00042448062,2.9284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040329387,0.0007447042,0.035584603,0.0055374717,0.0023348397,0.0000088368415,0.03736029,0.0034204628,0.008369547,0.061155397,0.8288967,0.012554204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050916796,0.0003690585,0.000846657,0.0003653227,0.00019661446,0.000002623713,0.0027105336,0.0004835467,0.0061224285,0.0020293286,0.9859328,0.0004318631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041352184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059473887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37395367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008011721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00150155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027903632","doi":"","title":"Economic Torts in Canada, 2nd ed.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Tort; Legislation; Liability","score_opus":0.011902411260249893,"score_gpt":0.25675253088833255,"score_spread":0.24485011962808267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027903632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7878528,0.00010951536,0.000015639413,0.010024422,0.0003418567,0.00019355731,0.000043383843,0.000032933884,0.20138587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930581,0.00007022188,0.00006051875,0.00055946945,0.0003169232,0.000030055304,0.0000012022407,0.0000069553494,0.0058965585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991992,0.000042560936,0.00015823207,0.00018769392,0.00012646428,0.00028585058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946934,0.00007669656,0.00004374206,0.00020120053,0.000015085303,0.00019395626],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020918333,0.00006412004,0.00009384392,0.000013641133,0.0002074779,0.000043137014,0.00024253408,0.000040624647,0.002125898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003415938,0.00005186319,0.000026574935,0.000054509776,0.00007763671,0.00020375606,0.00003993214,0.00006881219,0.0005476254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037660207,0.000015502335,0.06405658,0.0000022427628,0.000005891209,0.0000062079653,0.0002082192,0.000016528407,0.0001734717,0.9004682,0.03094846,0.0040949793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015026776,0.000003100727,0.021287706,0.000011577101,0.0000017152032,2.3910448e-7,0.00020320523,0.0000027720696,0.00012955669,0.002665995,0.9754394,0.00010444537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99953324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94449097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011088648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014392778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042151788","doi":"","title":"An Old Bottle for the New Wine: Understanding the Duty of Honest Performance under the Objective Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Equivocation; Section (typography); Base (topology)","score_opus":0.03432905189601945,"score_gpt":0.3114762500529988,"score_spread":0.2771471981569793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042151788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27324918,0.008170127,0.2291149,0.24300142,0.003736149,0.0070389146,0.00024017284,0.0007682851,0.23468086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99219596,0.00011456749,0.00006921051,0.00086090073,0.00092006876,0.00007461603,0.0000022386314,0.000015277103,0.0057471683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990357,0.00013186569,0.0001490528,0.00018972396,0.00025282722,0.00024083868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982751,0.0011600051,0.000055674464,0.0003891968,0.000044919943,0.000075104916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013874751,0.00009450661,0.00008845204,0.000013465206,0.0017201474,0.0002904919,0.0006038295,0.000055606208,0.00015276266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005795401,0.000045130964,0.00009771216,0.00034029092,0.00054357597,0.00030112464,0.000051397583,0.00023794438,0.000039260492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011544068,0.000012544176,0.000076990276,0.000008651255,0.00003263846,9.191066e-8,0.0052594594,0.00034134288,0.00011796544,0.9912314,0.002407549,0.00049983413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027867587,0.00008738272,0.003829713,0.00007479452,0.00013976399,0.000001962989,0.07795484,0.0025273042,0.00057212514,0.43643168,0.47786474,0.00023702011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030219695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048846086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7189468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013488285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029037904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043834974","doi":"","title":"Unjust Factors, Absence of Juristic Reason and the Development of Canadian Unjust(ified) Enrichment Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Perspective (graphical); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.024692620754561825,"score_gpt":0.27082046595484627,"score_spread":0.24612784520028444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043834974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69804573,0.00044814407,0.00024778701,0.0066898204,0.00020514244,0.0007734704,0.00011592368,0.000040874944,0.2934331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974016,0.000109603614,0.0006064681,0.00013192653,0.000056081004,0.0000248752,0.0000029511946,0.000006577571,0.001659901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886316,0.00008807451,0.0002906537,0.00018456976,0.00028521311,0.00028835319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898887,0.00024143694,0.00013407752,0.00024808542,0.00009789395,0.00028965427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006593895,0.000096141106,0.00016749607,0.000043678527,0.0005560936,0.00003519084,0.0003090467,0.00006511503,0.00019948347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013060535,0.00005690066,0.000038876104,0.00024144411,0.0007113016,0.000108702385,0.00005460504,0.000078213256,0.000030325928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067070064,0.000016733611,0.0026238374,0.000010351333,0.000014227012,2.6748788e-7,0.0027633344,6.514665e-7,0.00031068383,0.9932111,0.00029367677,0.00074844045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059679383,0.000017550463,0.025923142,0.00009210592,0.000024886433,2.9444206e-7,0.0021895738,0.000002013861,0.002691108,0.008496959,0.9597715,0.00019404653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47288492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7861266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98471415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014838781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054479396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53062516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043898804","doi":"","title":"Walter Leishman McGregor","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Artillery; German; World War II; First world war; First law","score_opus":0.020276411185172302,"score_gpt":0.28993775341741207,"score_spread":0.26966134223223975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043898804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096933536,0.00006853528,0.0011161973,0.0119939465,0.00033998137,0.0002850511,0.00000968866,0.000252973,0.8890001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789757,0.000013401293,0.0007262922,0.0023746472,0.0010119528,0.00003845107,0.0000054941092,0.00001322731,0.016840842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989122,0.0001053322,0.00015312797,0.00023437614,0.00026550933,0.00032943662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992228,0.000072660885,0.000053172495,0.00032639023,0.00005971035,0.00026523622],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004785511,0.000088307985,0.000114042734,0.000018560684,0.00078307523,0.00017504026,0.00037034028,0.00007981517,0.0011952535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011218632,0.000082567516,0.00007068867,0.00016035678,0.0001954497,0.00024726262,0.00006360217,0.00016172636,0.0024750421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016491022,0.000025164361,0.0010909655,0.000003219727,0.000004400989,4.805154e-7,0.00038144938,0.0000051995976,0.00013797825,0.9885732,0.006936743,0.002839557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000136033,0.000012732988,0.0015347914,0.0000058044193,0.000006338615,3.2610643e-7,0.000153012,0.00004187379,0.00020745325,0.014462484,0.9833135,0.00012566817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008123199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0121317115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056025663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050601615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043955713","doi":"","title":"Who then â in Law â is my Neighbour? Lord Atkinâs âNeighbour Principleâ as an Aid for the Principled Delineation of the Boundaries of Negligent Liability","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Duty; Tort; Res ipsa loquitur; Objectivity (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Function (biology); Duty of care; Strict liability","score_opus":0.010155480834248753,"score_gpt":0.22143760315070443,"score_spread":0.21128212231645568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043955713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72690743,0.00032848903,0.000098502285,0.0051894053,0.00042318398,0.0020597305,0.00091383234,0.000009469133,0.26406994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840795,0.00017036774,0.00022755621,0.0004902659,0.0000814346,0.00008334955,0.000036470377,0.000021260907,0.014809832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725336,0.0001521906,0.0006053614,0.0002947444,0.0014142422,0.00028010024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835986,0.00039893645,0.00064808887,0.00045233744,0.000010197465,0.00013056176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009883875,0.0002060864,0.0003477707,0.000019110492,0.0007506898,0.000054268494,0.0007225389,0.00008688565,0.00007397139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032493615,0.00014590404,0.000093211034,0.0001421024,0.00051539,0.0003024847,0.00010558298,0.00019251315,3.0480374e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041813395,0.00006160082,0.010217302,0.00026473464,0.000057335714,3.9417276e-7,0.0067727766,0.000027708764,0.00037116566,0.9791258,0.00005853915,0.0026245103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007368129,0.00016951414,0.19441602,0.0004059898,0.00016423175,4.2970538e-7,0.040073823,0.0014827262,0.072307564,0.043503616,0.64622426,0.000515004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16094628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75127035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93562216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002660066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057492633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7044149322","doi":"","title":"Whither Choice of Law? A Look at Canada and Australia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.02918733016275552,"score_gpt":0.2983375056976728,"score_spread":0.26915017553491727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7044149322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9121597,0.00008825283,0.0000069368966,0.002452306,0.00008096524,0.00017333415,0.000034881847,0.000022858685,0.08498081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98682183,0.000010948552,0.00021834437,0.0006738179,0.00014438208,0.000013530085,0.0000026520693,0.0000067889387,0.012107696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999222,0.000027181213,0.00013664275,0.0001619504,0.00023570447,0.00021651661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948484,0.000037008755,0.000058733618,0.00017410667,0.000046323323,0.00019901694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012209409,0.000071554896,0.000104986815,0.000007283165,0.00037132285,0.00003903493,0.0001691296,0.000054859767,0.00048063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028888231,0.00006812584,0.000026093292,0.000096595555,0.00024436435,0.00012284335,0.00005224226,0.00009378521,0.00005371832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002987408,0.000023363658,0.009846846,0.0000099303215,0.000010919273,0.0000020430577,0.0005863546,0.000037102556,0.00051614153,0.98715067,0.0017734092,0.000040222454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032660438,0.000012973545,0.015803676,0.000018869523,0.000012770525,7.2523966e-7,0.0002255005,6.2073315e-7,0.0011681379,0.004925066,0.9773721,0.00013293838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99833053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021137601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027368742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52625614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066750337","doi":"","title":"Inclusion (In)Action Within the Province of Alberta","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Declaration; Diversity (politics); Convention; Cover (algebra); Order (exchange); Action (physics); Human rights","score_opus":0.23361595170594893,"score_gpt":0.5767227454219558,"score_spread":0.34310679371600683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066750337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87994075,0.008772359,0.000309676,0.0069489563,0.0008241025,0.0011039713,0.000018514318,0.00004035057,0.10204131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938974,0.0027262177,0.00004983703,0.000128748,0.00017232173,0.00003318961,0.0000020956024,0.000015316673,0.0029749102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812746,0.00026082864,0.00053233776,0.0002395547,0.0006484357,0.00019136425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865186,0.00051082217,0.00036054596,0.00026518354,0.00011960493,0.0000919815],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023819942,0.00011407985,0.00024403537,0.00023648173,0.0006845419,0.0008067223,0.0020642402,0.00007526868,0.0016702715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029995892,0.000080811624,0.00009967113,0.0011224636,0.00022502398,0.0016171971,0.0016153291,0.00032432578,0.0000150192245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028735466,0.0010580202,0.18506019,0.00059637893,0.00030344573,0.000057363304,0.045287833,0.0023608564,0.15175974,0.38974872,0.07363264,0.14984746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037873836,0.000015883616,0.2079728,0.0013898426,0.000114364026,0.0000058357546,0.0023947929,0.001587766,0.02407797,0.15753928,0.60394484,0.00057789753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04727822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027410215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5303122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014394245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005013796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067007979","doi":"","title":"L'Administration des biens d'autrui dans le code civil du Québec","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.02753607660118061,"score_gpt":0.28166582439564064,"score_spread":0.25412974779446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067007979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4370125,0.00044770679,0.026141087,0.1429036,0.00024673034,0.00022257808,0.000036417885,0.00011719255,0.39287218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9501618,0.00021658168,0.0016926321,0.00039714563,0.0004138646,0.000026407406,0.0000070597353,0.000012199197,0.047072288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989086,0.000059835842,0.0002332044,0.00025335568,0.00020762396,0.00033740394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993967,0.0000586133,0.000075004515,0.00019380405,0.0000807711,0.0001951017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025825846,0.00012353808,0.000113469825,0.000019528972,0.0012476193,0.0001385165,0.00025411005,0.000115833434,0.00092298543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051925123,0.00012380605,0.00009223607,0.0003738618,0.0012211206,0.0003706708,0.000044589768,0.00011181923,0.0006645509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002437445,0.00029566465,0.0020948015,0.000011880516,0.000011540006,0.0000035859473,0.012907179,0.00011446091,0.0008442616,0.98001474,0.00092456164,0.0027748945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041664377,0.00011292833,0.008789094,0.000034584264,0.00003966546,0.00001246925,0.018217165,0.00017876821,0.007289271,0.034279775,0.9303187,0.00031093205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4559106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93970525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004662645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002561799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067674630","doi":"","title":"Map of Capisallo City, Hidalgo County, Texas [Mercedes, Texas]","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mile; Subdivision; Center pivot irrigation; Center (category theory); Intersection (aeronautics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.029337261654168563,"score_gpt":0.2685165323833572,"score_spread":0.23917927072918865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067674630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8448853,0.00074978813,0.0011442243,0.023628406,0.00063322065,0.0016592061,0.00030007635,0.0005702994,0.1264295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96610826,0.0012903693,0.00046083733,0.00011931233,0.00013914208,7.552055e-7,0.000040124633,0.000024903848,0.031816263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974558,0.00032661587,0.0003347999,0.00043692402,0.0008938906,0.0005520112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997993,0.00037206896,0.00031877361,0.0006767209,0.00034754485,0.00029191442],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001723369,0.00022643048,0.00040653782,0.00025641048,0.001329872,0.00009764487,0.0017297629,0.00030451964,0.001537889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014442542,0.00021405827,0.00036888308,0.0011803991,0.001238858,0.0004370672,0.00048872875,0.00065299193,0.00080934446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000588942,0.0012915354,0.37519974,0.00041175616,0.0012309247,0.00009237381,0.028404802,0.002251932,0.0017610369,0.319304,0.25639224,0.013070731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001253407,0.00006133915,0.120686196,0.00010980564,0.00017031534,0.0000012691272,0.004129063,0.00015192248,0.00015055123,0.005517614,0.86737835,0.00039014535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012226622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068482677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6109861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015402968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039971658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070356180","doi":"","title":"Personal Property Security in Australia-A Long, Long Trail A-Winding","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Property (philosophy); Security interest; Property law; National security; Range (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.046526334373289555,"score_gpt":0.3216374382299538,"score_spread":0.2751111038566642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070356180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8993175,0.0000864774,0.000038587834,0.0035097054,0.00013131349,0.00040275318,0.000012771586,0.00009551047,0.09640536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97010934,0.000044527187,0.000094111325,0.00031980238,0.00048872695,0.000054871532,0.000008826229,0.000013053351,0.02886672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982955,0.000130884,0.0002563613,0.00035453695,0.00041251173,0.0005502076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993516,0.000037153462,0.000069102876,0.00019214432,0.000055098415,0.00029485932],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006857771,0.00013955435,0.0001764866,0.000046568905,0.00060743117,0.00021966214,0.00033643903,0.00014523065,0.002335544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008269262,0.000114677765,0.00010002167,0.00044951504,0.0002471524,0.00049731426,0.000057920817,0.0004142807,0.00060293596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052410953,0.0007227122,0.5908291,0.00006556865,0.000051906063,0.00023462946,0.030391758,0.00005389706,0.00070526,0.36586556,0.007079676,0.0039475355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000882734,0.000045267552,0.16560294,0.00010549322,0.000024705349,0.000014531251,0.003496729,0.00013350506,0.0002442222,0.006223535,0.8226031,0.0006232383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045770098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15131944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81552345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002386192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001489554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070617147","doi":"","title":"Points saillants de l'exercice 2002","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Work (physics); Point (geometry); Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.010058730905100219,"score_gpt":0.22057538165545607,"score_spread":0.21051665075035586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070617147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001885661,0.00028284834,7.183399e-7,0.0008542771,0.00014462895,0.00041599234,0.00015988117,0.00021896175,0.9979038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005453025,0.0012835597,0.0011407627,0.0003932115,0.00033979135,0.000020821528,0.000035813853,0.00008055589,0.9961602],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844664,0.0001067053,0.0004080093,0.00017329975,0.00046324014,0.00040207626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988647,0.00009362629,0.0004232637,0.0003145037,0.00011186277,0.00019203447],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034078743,0.00021749124,0.00028629682,0.000057682322,0.00019833773,0.000078994366,0.0004646262,0.00042771784,0.715412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016291894,0.0002269573,0.00013102428,0.000013192087,0.00021095946,2.1239899e-7,0.0000655328,0.00023235625,0.04981496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007060189,0.000034917724,0.000004314117,0.000086924156,0.000019490724,0.0000043546866,0.00058788183,0.000025463038,5.053884e-8,0.0005453639,0.9967304,0.001953813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019710175,0.000020359024,0.000007873231,0.00011202953,0.000029445135,0.0000058125916,0.00032355826,0.000010745667,0.0000013556895,0.000023691808,0.9990194,0.00024864494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044454366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013730416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.665597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010211739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060184768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9619087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071078709","doi":"","title":"(Review) Bank and Customer Law in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Payment; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.014359960372853406,"score_gpt":0.21816379117883264,"score_spread":0.20380383080597925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071078709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026367784,0.0006409435,0.000010427818,0.3842227,0.00008445545,0.00036476064,0.0000318794,0.00008531999,0.58819175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93953234,0.0050916653,0.00033863154,0.003254008,0.00004959076,9.941358e-7,0.000009195881,0.000008874631,0.05171471],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993524,0.00009454365,0.000057013644,0.000154583,0.00015056907,0.0001909204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999526,0.0000409117,0.00003541459,0.00012474095,0.000021187609,0.0002516935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000062210114,0.00006558369,0.000109811226,0.00003315024,0.00016137231,0.0000206191,0.00021708311,0.000035357923,0.00015606119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013445198,0.00007183135,0.000018410192,0.00035263138,0.00011064896,0.00065517717,0.0001216012,0.00010723168,0.000028300286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049477076,0.000013903452,0.015094771,0.000022943806,0.000004511822,0.000025411082,0.00062983384,0.00000610305,1.2504029e-7,0.2649846,0.7189586,0.00025421797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001267194,0.000003852899,0.0024362968,0.000039354472,0.000006514913,3.7584346e-8,0.0025242507,0.000001409194,0.000006475153,0.00022317003,0.99453574,0.000096171454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99213994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9405411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91316456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023959338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013224614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29291978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071240755","doi":"","title":"Statement of facts relative to an adjustment of a difficulty...between I.H. Smith, of New York, and J.B Smith, of Montreal, Canada.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Mistake; Criticism; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.016169557235486885,"score_gpt":0.22413179776726622,"score_spread":0.20796224053177934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071240755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96901035,0.000028810344,0.00057778927,0.017480459,0.000021308762,0.0004447824,0.0002780007,0.000020618756,0.012137905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98284644,0.00007707355,0.0016563118,0.0000226754,0.00002290269,4.1628812e-7,0.000010691425,0.0000071113623,0.015356349],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989713,0.0001360372,0.00021015042,0.00019802056,0.00030630943,0.00017820385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896616,0.00013124954,0.00031007623,0.00022359405,0.00007346767,0.00029543106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000065858025,0.00010488429,0.00029651946,0.00009072679,0.00009418546,0.000006612926,0.0002888475,0.00006154641,0.000041583262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025552617,0.00010526423,0.00004552908,0.0003596002,0.00016762236,0.00041771933,0.0001365126,0.00006954311,5.034417e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043321075,0.0008726953,0.2479591,0.00051370985,0.00062306446,0.0000068597137,0.10952991,0.0013357387,0.00039461098,0.30273524,0.32326752,0.012328358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010124431,0.000526876,0.6747557,0.00015590384,0.0001493517,1.7856525e-8,0.026294464,0.000012572998,0.007061737,0.00079668954,0.28894368,0.00029061118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9050181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22541898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6795991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082696424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008542609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7887151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072074807","doi":"","title":"Thresholds of Actionable Mental Harm in Negligence:\\nA Policy-Based Appraisal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Plaintiff; Damages; Compensation (psychology); Limiting; Mental illness; Legitimacy; Relevance (law)","score_opus":0.022956467297498836,"score_gpt":0.3296036188501974,"score_spread":0.30664715155269856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072074807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7519038,0.00009231221,0.00014342084,0.008275021,0.00025457607,0.00071991736,0.000039003215,0.00009268355,0.2384793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581677,0.000021009633,0.00059493934,0.0005725883,0.0002639573,0.00014066078,0.000011287158,0.000010666225,0.0025680976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998781,0.00006511643,0.00024647545,0.00021370384,0.0003509919,0.0003426685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931836,0.00009173698,0.000089477166,0.00023608134,0.000075559255,0.00018878824],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026481415,0.00009785459,0.00014120017,0.000067880654,0.00033476937,0.00009743732,0.0003437118,0.000098079036,0.0018560934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095632844,0.00009696822,0.000070732975,0.00047441028,0.00026111715,0.0004336953,0.000053042073,0.00017081332,0.0004507695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012367413,0.00019360862,0.015211767,0.00001478123,0.000010461406,7.185528e-7,0.0015233196,0.00017657605,0.0059574437,0.9720772,0.003729178,0.0010925989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000995463,0.00007897326,0.029067084,0.00005812439,0.000011386922,7.822773e-7,0.004273635,0.00070134946,0.011496077,0.015180107,0.9376959,0.00044112647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15376578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01105013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9568971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015489191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004194119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095096873","doi":"","title":"166 International Journal of Circumpolar Health 70:2 2011 Obesity risks among Inuit ORIGINAL ARTICLE Obesity risks: towards an emerging Inuit pattern","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waist; Anthropometry; Obesity; Circumpolar star; Body mass index; Quartile; Metabolic syndrome","score_opus":0.05829333493134414,"score_gpt":0.3892522800892196,"score_spread":0.33095894515787544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095096873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98994416,0.000023715174,0.0037150346,0.003850832,0.00075823,0.00021388746,0.000047812882,0.00006723572,0.0013791135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723047,0.00008685498,0.00095578574,0.00037517192,0.0010846913,0.0000058719475,0.0000041488556,0.000012865995,0.00024413811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772304,0.0002128468,0.0005338683,0.0002661449,0.0008375936,0.00042649236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982552,0.00004781455,0.0004597627,0.00028672948,0.0004661495,0.00048432904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022499305,0.00014320071,0.00023589836,0.00011731934,0.0006577973,0.00026442527,0.0009303832,0.0001247243,0.0024394183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110688954,0.00013136778,0.00013021534,0.00019075573,0.00026872536,0.0009411096,0.00013549684,0.00066201674,0.00010100569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009415995,0.00046790825,0.9015362,0.0000068066956,0.00004397621,0.0000075568114,0.03001677,0.000021141315,0.0005248058,0.01515246,0.0006769272,0.051535983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040195635,0.00007448422,0.97212964,0.000016052914,0.000020718333,0.00000799781,0.0045399982,0.00054723705,0.00059292186,0.0039700367,0.017470276,0.00022867862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.158662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20932262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070593394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031310372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010449603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096127961","doi":"","title":"THESIS (OTHER THAN BRIEF EXCERPTS REQUIRING ONLY PROPER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IN SCHOLARLY WRITING) AND THAT ALL SUCH USE","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Permission; Work (physics); Confidentiality; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.11132308240996933,"score_gpt":0.3383433589000355,"score_spread":0.22702027649006615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096127961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7348436,0.00009159887,0.00012663058,0.0018669585,0.000030337902,0.0003496278,0.000001918922,0.000048526497,0.2626408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792299,0.00011236987,0.0008855603,0.0005679084,0.000054128617,0.00003304973,5.131157e-7,0.000012433191,0.019104095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894136,0.00014252646,0.00014807211,0.0002558016,0.00021522037,0.0002970209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995309,0.00008151947,0.00003835683,0.00017770896,0.00006954287,0.000101956255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008785601,0.000089983085,0.00009916864,0.000045650504,0.0002748927,0.0006756656,0.00015508634,0.000066306086,0.0004087152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020354494,0.00007324399,0.00002892467,0.00017033528,0.000109260545,0.0010483616,0.00005479246,0.00012440451,0.00007418163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004096102,0.0001625565,0.40215757,0.000012906485,0.000018917519,0.000002395539,0.00952727,0.0000018478714,0.00069028913,0.5791396,0.0008108779,0.0074716886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031788624,0.000015326314,0.10973083,0.00004236593,0.000009941351,8.5801514e-7,0.0047712624,0.000012493104,0.0005044657,0.0013530378,0.88302696,0.00021454677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005338175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025196612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8822161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081324295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105879444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096714068","doi":"","title":"Dissertation Repository. Paper 1698. EVALUATION OF ONTARIO’S STREET RACERS, STUNT AND AGGRESSIVE DRIVERS LEGISLATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Inclusion (mineral); Government (linguistics); Confidentiality; Work (physics); Electronic surveillance","score_opus":0.02144983035866106,"score_gpt":0.31970207200741546,"score_spread":0.2982522416487544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096714068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9170218,0.000031773736,0.000077089004,0.00058916543,0.00005482299,0.0005284162,8.6733183e-7,0.000018020373,0.08167806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574375,0.000012088622,0.00056642364,0.000025508243,0.000037051563,0.000063068524,0.000009715557,0.0000031837833,0.0035391925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999118,0.00008857003,0.00015657273,0.00013954956,0.0004038734,0.00009344166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992674,0.00004663135,0.00019602328,0.00010532381,0.00032798466,0.000056634202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031866413,0.000052539515,0.00006682179,0.000025798203,0.00028755583,0.00006053745,0.0000638937,0.00005007269,0.00060304144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006755253,0.000046193138,0.00002266473,0.00008253732,0.000086169166,0.0005583666,0.000014142537,0.00004491526,0.000009045579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018917774,0.0002341778,0.40105745,0.000016846348,0.000104386614,8.7520976e-7,0.20559256,0.00072493614,0.018457254,0.2893282,0.0025348014,0.08192963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005399961,0.000041241183,0.9550302,0.00002639862,0.00009650198,3.416556e-7,0.026352243,0.0021054205,0.0010383796,0.0052576666,0.009341569,0.00017006764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35040477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39743954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5539727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022846504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033563955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6602881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097297381","doi":"","title":"Dear Mr. Salvin:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Control (management); Subject (documents); Information governance","score_opus":0.10717792503863512,"score_gpt":0.3266939642630855,"score_spread":0.2195160392244504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097297381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02717087,0.000009208711,0.0005242374,0.0010072943,0.00003478591,0.000052919673,5.37758e-7,0.00007149695,0.97112864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745156,0.000014235615,0.0020536943,0.00028068756,0.00007273096,0.0000063109883,2.368433e-7,0.0000019661413,0.02305455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973214,0.0000121460325,0.00003874157,0.000056176345,0.00006687475,0.000093927745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983597,0.0000101549,0.000009354602,0.00007459618,0.000017641532,0.000052283594],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010430438,0.000018625557,0.000022284657,0.0000070486017,0.00018937819,0.000013942994,0.00011034203,0.000019826033,0.0039941333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014310448,0.000015523927,0.000017130496,0.00007148525,0.00005685173,0.000059820835,0.0000171908,0.000024260053,0.00085751724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.2239342e-7,0.000012979746,0.0015185322,2.119517e-7,0.0000010526779,1.687866e-7,0.0030173017,2.6307939e-8,0.000025607771,0.9908432,0.003037571,0.0015430342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002623331,0.000003963945,0.007319427,5.29656e-7,0.0000017632857,6.8418075e-8,0.0013382857,0.000004872129,0.0002793037,0.012492036,0.9784922,0.00004132214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077250563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025961322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009916663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003287275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097549411","doi":"","title":"AND REGISTRATION EXEMPTIONS Supplement to the OSC Bulletin","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Subpoena; Work (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.02474056876778684,"score_gpt":0.33061279760585016,"score_spread":0.3058722288380633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097549411","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073758443,0.000009487282,0.0037301488,0.8070682,0.000020311598,0.0002715193,0.000003994553,0.00003287662,0.18148758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795099,0.000027854463,0.0013732169,0.0035749457,0.00013165399,0.000019143297,0.0000025261916,8.820008e-7,0.015359917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996736,0.000018965235,0.000057798097,0.000072216215,0.00009414651,0.00008327475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981594,0.00001829901,0.000011954616,0.00008564616,0.000019009876,0.000049161998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022567982,0.000022999593,0.000020978088,0.0000072304388,0.0005068284,0.00007805344,0.000075017015,0.000012424254,0.0005990696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020931278,0.000015538917,0.00000953167,0.00007060567,0.00002655791,0.000040647465,0.000009924375,0.00002596521,0.000110608984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.827452e-7,0.00000957586,0.000038545604,1.197067e-7,4.508149e-7,3.492336e-8,0.0010413,0.000003044805,0.00004590397,0.898699,0.09738745,0.0027740977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024579735,0.000012707748,0.004989201,7.116281e-7,0.0000018140297,9.891835e-8,0.0011169083,0.000004631872,0.000016915437,0.0032297226,0.9905771,0.000025629988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001833466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005389831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014771913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017233147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65593916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097610440","doi":"","title":"CONSTITUTION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Remuneration; Compensation (psychology); Constitution; Payment; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.030693818916177396,"score_gpt":0.3418624410977331,"score_spread":0.3111686221815557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097610440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006210899,0.0000028877243,0.012851534,0.017580884,0.000033525226,0.000034203684,8.851052e-7,0.00005086387,0.9632343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749023,0.000014561955,0.00021788928,0.00012622152,0.00006272383,0.000003500367,6.229047e-8,3.158116e-7,0.024672477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984884,0.000007102287,0.000021692393,0.000031663632,0.00004226716,0.000048407135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99990207,0.000020378626,0.000005087938,0.000034114895,0.000013336074,0.000025035837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006984907,0.000008854767,0.00001062938,0.0000040983673,0.00013959546,0.000008056138,0.000036441386,0.000010368755,0.00090976385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027599923,0.0000048644033,0.0000073613314,0.00003062073,0.00011114067,0.00005831602,0.0000051160396,0.0000049924092,0.0006165866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.11821606e-7,0.0000022524969,0.00045493874,4.394862e-8,2.6778326e-7,3.0751018e-8,0.00006687269,1.5110219e-8,0.00047030972,0.9864987,0.0018894296,0.010617031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002750671,7.8541535e-7,0.0005113595,8.7554145e-7,3.871644e-7,3.593484e-8,0.00008292697,2.4611984e-7,0.00024288699,0.008555849,0.9905632,0.000013941062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005220521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005562153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98867375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001577166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040125444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99612767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097647938","doi":"","title":"WELFARE REFORM AND EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES OF WELFARE RECIPIENTS AND SINGLE-MOTHERS”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Permission; Welfare; Welfare reform","score_opus":0.05983867222430287,"score_gpt":0.30262339173348335,"score_spread":0.24278471950918049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097647938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.684721,0.000030461202,0.000018595836,0.0076866797,0.00003789271,0.00015553556,0.00000813617,0.00003193461,0.3073098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961737,0.000029762214,0.0007969256,0.00009008854,0.000010544937,0.000008110418,8.01929e-7,0.000004847091,0.0028852178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999488,0.000016351796,0.00012152874,0.0001247251,0.00012598633,0.00012338454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997146,0.0000067913506,0.000050101928,0.00011300052,0.0000349994,0.00008051259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013449314,0.00005583375,0.00009578919,0.000023635112,0.00028943073,0.000018629507,0.000091058944,0.000041263298,0.00037394723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014509753,0.00004077225,0.000020611353,0.00006809847,0.00015832407,0.000101979174,0.00006198279,0.000030793402,0.0000034107056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007165988,0.00013282617,0.14272852,0.0000072245493,0.000024743571,4.1076507e-7,0.015819887,3.0423347e-8,0.000056069846,0.81549346,0.00004439203,0.025685297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025888722,0.0000716518,0.7973088,0.000007506448,0.000016289721,4.0984753e-7,0.017599465,0.000002340777,0.00032861874,0.0018053659,0.18247043,0.00013020521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018388571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048891986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8136881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043174496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008452345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097726869","doi":"","title":"External Examiner:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Acknowledgement; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.11948725566791689,"score_gpt":0.32385045620492525,"score_spread":0.20436320053700835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097726869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06391168,0.000009201562,0.0024054986,0.00026060877,0.00003394832,0.000036519752,3.1820693e-7,0.000048293765,0.93329394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613573,0.000010213492,0.0028825698,0.00015627794,0.00009272926,0.0000056244885,9.715259e-8,0.0000014008217,0.03549382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997655,0.000010401802,0.00003545447,0.000047759404,0.00006343252,0.00007741947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998655,0.000007867804,0.000008877785,0.00005929228,0.0000135110095,0.000044976194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009355468,0.000016154003,0.000018119677,0.000006581954,0.00012666466,0.000011952487,0.00010044355,0.000014132423,0.003252416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008967486,0.000013216959,0.000012751918,0.00004652951,0.000048161943,0.00005715583,0.000013530492,0.000019729625,0.00037463655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1750955e-7,0.000013000473,0.0023211911,1.4700237e-7,5.583382e-7,2.8907974e-7,0.0031991294,1.980498e-8,0.000103671286,0.98892325,0.00060076336,0.0048376517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057116362,0.000008050019,0.051653244,0.0000014521661,0.0000026127439,2.807884e-7,0.0019740015,0.000008090759,0.0006749768,0.023550993,0.92199713,0.00007203098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071597616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012412705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96537226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072986913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018909794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097802619","doi":"","title":"The Parties and the Nature of the Claim","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Cause of action; Action (physics); Supreme court; Statute; Equity (law); Discretion; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.010973273148248523,"score_gpt":0.3100184362073328,"score_spread":0.2990451630590843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097802619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24172164,0.0008202982,0.000057627512,0.11904138,0.00012592561,0.00027880684,0.0000012526116,0.000015699976,0.63793737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99034405,0.00010400451,0.000014148952,0.0005359014,0.0000681862,0.00000356178,3.0947426e-8,8.8908337e-7,0.00892923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996779,0.000038158938,0.000057300636,0.000033768592,0.00011441386,0.00007848456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946845,0.00035242914,0.0000275102,0.00011419419,0.000024416993,0.000012998797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090348744,0.000018425984,0.000024592176,0.0000017754517,0.000896729,0.000034738863,0.00019743426,0.00003159285,0.0000146272505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008220167,0.0000058531023,0.000023657323,0.00008740991,0.00074577786,0.000020527581,0.0000436453,0.00009490254,0.0000019414351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026586142,0.0000018759249,0.0007326998,2.733533e-7,0.0000019625572,5.934628e-9,0.0023511043,2.0435296e-7,0.000011273541,0.99426544,0.0013193765,0.0013131498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006767811,0.000001277076,0.018903494,0.0000011077851,0.0000038951016,8.351214e-8,0.00940524,0.000008013676,0.00026530377,0.03357235,0.93775547,0.000016102522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096921535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011935683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96069306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000043184355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021801225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6897005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098149397","doi":"","title":"External Examiner:","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Acknowledgement; Control (management)","score_opus":0.050407675913244715,"score_gpt":0.35790603204856897,"score_spread":0.3074983561353243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098149397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12924889,0.00005874457,0.0021250658,0.0011417383,0.000078628975,0.000039174465,3.9019204e-7,0.0000454214,0.86726195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96291596,0.000011117805,0.0010942438,0.00021762105,0.00049781613,0.000005594575,1.8545329e-7,0.0000014024,0.03525608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997166,0.00001291378,0.000032032724,0.000029202065,0.00007880956,0.00013044217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999835,0.000017831886,0.000008022154,0.00005011212,0.00000910276,0.00007989941],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016866086,0.000015938898,0.000017740733,0.000005711116,0.00014754634,0.000017601884,0.0000673927,0.000014204434,0.0013088183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013717334,0.0000129257205,0.000012204885,0.000047870064,0.000033334,0.00012276859,0.0000132834275,0.000020651578,0.0005135983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.216954e-7,0.000015766007,0.012409749,1.7882665e-7,4.8334965e-7,2.4421892e-8,0.001422831,9.717488e-8,0.0002305798,0.9790162,0.0016809087,0.0052230884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018910088,0.0000010030436,0.027981048,4.4269217e-7,0.0000010495507,1.2837536e-7,0.00061094906,0.0000023214873,0.00012614868,0.000849361,0.9703811,0.000027539478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014919282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020519512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9781668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012353219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012108544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7098685629","doi":"","title":"External Examiner: Dr. External Examiner","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Acknowledgement; Work (physics); Control (management)","score_opus":0.026864499436433324,"score_gpt":0.32553545031340236,"score_spread":0.29867095087696904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7098685629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5758162,0.000021818396,0.0034104493,0.002147073,0.00036639097,0.00013401994,0.00000462214,0.000115627285,0.41798377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8836256,0.000018638904,0.003146942,0.000374307,0.0011805275,0.000025734767,0.0000011362498,0.000009272622,0.11161779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998965,0.000034945322,0.00015993828,0.00021578388,0.00032529075,0.00029902722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934304,0.00008175773,0.00005098199,0.00025860913,0.00006598346,0.00019962716],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040039112,0.00008844527,0.000086886546,0.000032764234,0.0003964118,0.00015969675,0.00040998432,0.000090138186,0.0044828854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007387112,0.00007303708,0.000057485235,0.00014104102,0.00020651493,0.00021327795,0.00007187406,0.0002381616,0.00057430536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028412837,0.00008962449,0.010464251,0.0000021940386,0.000004511591,0.000004538218,0.0015966926,0.0000017224055,0.08088053,0.8808239,0.0042724074,0.0218568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018509002,0.000012891747,0.057577156,0.000005204767,0.0000073758947,0.0000036902068,0.0005019401,0.00008746244,0.0016413018,0.0055278703,0.93426615,0.00018386486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005022952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009660631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92999375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020352156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081224396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099530935","doi":"","title":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); MEDLINE; Public health","score_opus":0.035975801519866735,"score_gpt":0.30743867368293526,"score_spread":0.2714628721630685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099530935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67861044,0.000002814703,0.0000015963949,0.016715162,0.000023056456,0.00012170788,0.00002507334,0.000002026807,0.3044981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930634,0.0000021408619,0.00008377089,0.00006996638,0.00002234645,0.0000030091644,4.3352983e-8,6.2857185e-7,0.0067547313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929124,0.000015745647,0.00013295094,0.00005641475,0.00041972217,0.00008389715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991768,0.0000696009,0.00026693946,0.000037352427,0.00043278653,0.000016538394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040376454,0.000025678171,0.000056441597,0.000005141354,0.00025032955,0.000012020874,0.00035759705,0.000021849817,0.00005331626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002543229,0.000013695649,0.00002483865,0.00029576707,0.00032222405,0.0001064394,0.000038174538,0.000038122213,1.4693825e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.184281e-7,0.00002596468,0.03853571,0.0000040159284,0.0000052260143,1.4179075e-9,0.011579322,0.0000115296725,0.00085919106,0.9440823,0.004707686,0.00018810247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024955676,0.00007284024,0.45854285,0.00006514337,0.000036384645,1.8984336e-7,0.18390076,0.00024175119,0.13859579,0.0073181028,0.21079554,0.00018108745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21102579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74422616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93676424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007557052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016639367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7942281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100151405","doi":"","title":"External Examiner:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Acknowledgement; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.11948725566791689,"score_gpt":0.32385045620492525,"score_spread":0.20436320053700835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100151405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06391168,0.000009201562,0.0024054986,0.00026060877,0.00003394832,0.000036519752,3.1820693e-7,0.000048293765,0.93329394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613573,0.000010213492,0.0028825698,0.00015627794,0.00009272926,0.0000056244885,9.715259e-8,0.0000014008217,0.03549382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997655,0.000010401802,0.00003545447,0.000047759404,0.00006343252,0.00007741947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998655,0.000007867804,0.000008877785,0.00005929228,0.0000135110095,0.000044976194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009355468,0.000016154003,0.000018119677,0.000006581954,0.00012666466,0.000011952487,0.00010044355,0.000014132423,0.003252416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008967486,0.000013216959,0.000012751918,0.00004652951,0.000048161943,0.00005715583,0.000013530492,0.000019729625,0.00037463655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1750955e-7,0.000013000473,0.0023211911,1.4700237e-7,5.583382e-7,2.8907974e-7,0.0031991294,1.980498e-8,0.000103671286,0.98892325,0.00060076336,0.0048376517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057116362,0.000008050019,0.051653244,0.0000014521661,0.0000026127439,2.807884e-7,0.0019740015,0.000008090759,0.0006749768,0.023550993,0.92199713,0.00007203098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071597616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012412705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96537226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072986913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018909794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100178990","doi":"","title":"Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture On the Ownership of Funds in Transit in the Payment and Settlement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Payment; Transit (satellite); Government (linguistics); Human settlement","score_opus":0.07478407001324622,"score_gpt":0.33348539148499684,"score_spread":0.2587013214717506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100178990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92274976,0.00006326633,0.0000012798001,0.0412713,0.000010232599,0.0003035236,0.000033640496,0.0000015979055,0.035565425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989014,0.000026424856,0.000012810522,0.0008021026,0.00001552717,0.0000119055,0.00000212835,0.0000011392631,0.00022651105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994817,0.000072780975,0.000101407946,0.00007226108,0.00016755168,0.000104317885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998244,0.000038731974,0.000022985292,0.000038829206,0.0000075410353,0.00006750814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058588485,0.000037151072,0.00005327704,0.000023541483,0.00007340879,0.000015224472,0.00011350108,0.00003613566,0.00004298105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009082827,0.000017719587,0.000009909364,0.00013964239,0.00014272465,0.0000400809,0.000009805189,0.000084349056,7.9785383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013175398,0.00006365907,0.07498133,0.000005116112,0.0000062879117,7.7137645e-7,0.14240897,0.000006170742,0.00011867264,0.7767842,0.005118628,0.0004930248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010339653,0.00013597871,0.22773981,0.000038225553,0.00001653345,0.000001475548,0.37765613,0.000078112535,0.0013839995,0.007509107,0.38423568,0.00017097665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.118779674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5640962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76927507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006156948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006426094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8870884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100397813","doi":"","title":"Paper presented at the Association for Canadian Studies in the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Economic interdependence; Democracy; Politics; Capital (architecture); Association (psychology); Economic integration; Free trade","score_opus":0.07865786475912981,"score_gpt":0.37424100263268567,"score_spread":0.29558313787355583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100397813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33927792,0.0002833289,0.000024854731,0.29048482,0.00015866135,0.0018051047,0.00005414648,0.00003483292,0.36787635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96397495,0.0001771505,0.000020113708,0.0032863307,0.000035784233,0.00016774843,0.000015896956,0.0000024535289,0.032319568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994091,0.00016596697,0.00006847886,0.00006021036,0.000119770404,0.00017649023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909014,0.00069074356,0.000026408108,0.00007735716,0.00008783508,0.000027528446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010047563,0.000029748902,0.000034916517,0.000020424965,0.00088180037,0.00004220357,0.00011661863,0.000024699577,0.00006146354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058359804,0.000015192332,0.000018833663,0.00031640287,0.00005790802,0.000044582022,0.0000071223094,0.000039859846,0.000013821513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010003631,0.000014723771,0.013215833,0.0000016215201,0.000022228987,1.3719986e-7,0.03557459,0.00009876101,0.000005137122,0.8359076,0.11508859,0.00006982355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058370897,0.0000026858486,0.002676153,8.2588167e-7,0.0000045038046,2.7464631e-8,0.04394126,0.000027677037,0.000008884314,0.0048975805,0.94835675,0.00002527383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48680896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97733337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83326817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032413274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090251815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6782185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100446067","doi":"","title":"B. Contract Payments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Closing (real estate)","score_opus":0.0245684150025861,"score_gpt":0.3214493475446296,"score_spread":0.2968809325420435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100446067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10155151,0.000005669161,0.00014199897,0.0070859105,0.000026535963,0.000132263,4.247655e-7,0.00003131399,0.89102435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577486,0.0000062010504,0.00021927636,0.0006166916,0.000053848922,0.00002748867,4.3540973e-7,0.0000011674753,0.041326273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975425,0.000010172423,0.000037270504,0.000043252785,0.000066908404,0.00008811657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998477,0.000018379156,0.000009317708,0.000050391147,0.000022517484,0.000051697807],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005275356,0.00001581109,0.000020207928,0.00000432682,0.00016050889,0.000053160606,0.00007045486,0.000014762588,0.014836989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010023356,0.000012186636,0.000012001741,0.000040221843,0.000031811724,0.00010983215,0.0000086348555,0.000018734594,0.0070666997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.3911101e-7,0.000028757007,0.022288712,3.179302e-7,0.0000027328413,5.833952e-8,0.0009677725,3.145458e-7,0.0002298595,0.9339516,0.03249582,0.010033896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043155753,0.0000017640626,0.08718542,4.5356154e-7,9.237069e-7,2.732504e-8,0.0005106971,0.000021036689,0.000053081134,0.0057014283,0.90644693,0.000035074772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020326458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006238322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011548368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018274193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100489967","doi":"","title":"PREVENTION OF PROBLEM GAMBLING: LESSONS LEARNED","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Coping (psychology); Control (management); Program evaluation; Table (database); Randomized controlled trial","score_opus":0.16149928606259975,"score_gpt":0.4308508128381493,"score_spread":0.2693515267755495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100489967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06346955,0.0000189075,0.02142599,0.07179897,0.000036346082,0.00030061704,0.000004717218,0.00009829427,0.8428466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93700445,0.00006313862,0.0014325557,0.000017267786,0.000039946237,0.000012352708,3.4062444e-7,0.0000021788562,0.06142778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996028,0.00003092049,0.00008751366,0.00007736368,0.000110516325,0.00009091521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975073,0.00003954851,0.000044832046,0.0000816821,0.000048603226,0.000034573306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026805047,0.000022709657,0.000041537915,0.000015485699,0.000107329266,0.000009913773,0.00009608026,0.000027326603,0.0004640383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040846542,0.000014267324,0.000032258384,0.000101259364,0.00007485635,0.000089953515,0.000018917224,0.00001590161,0.000068550165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011419319,0.000028988843,0.00032907593,0.0000016548183,0.00000241262,2.0036186e-8,0.00042520917,4.5206022e-7,0.005131699,0.9351476,0.0004652062,0.058466535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002229188,0.000024625602,0.0017118594,0.000027277587,0.000007199433,6.632204e-8,0.00079535117,0.0000049993178,0.0054108785,0.1548927,0.8368279,0.000074252246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056923326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001015324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87353486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016863178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007767715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5080894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100938230","doi":"","title":"HUMAN RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Notice; Corporate governance; Attendance; Compensation (psychology); Audit committee; Human resources","score_opus":0.07158533534240863,"score_gpt":0.3518638906593098,"score_spread":0.28027855531690116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100938230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6194333,0.000013390668,0.000029822933,0.0006990388,0.000007221976,0.00004519028,0.0000012657969,0.000014061149,0.37975672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976079,0.000007836583,0.00029026504,0.000076182696,0.000053884014,0.000003007961,0.0000012546778,0.0000013393428,0.0019583579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999698,0.00002988458,0.00006871437,0.00003974863,0.00008287758,0.000080816404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998116,0.000027564649,0.00003510149,0.00006576653,0.000015391375,0.000044615885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021915535,0.000021940315,0.00004070343,0.000011566803,0.0002340303,0.000015375908,0.000065688306,0.000022795535,0.0001417046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010101793,0.000018059201,0.0000071055942,0.000046802506,0.00013123332,0.000097834076,0.000025118765,0.000028785891,0.000009451197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1389038e-7,0.00001929429,0.05306544,0.000002252647,0.0000013171822,6.2972347e-9,0.0060465145,1.1316135e-7,0.0010251417,0.93835855,0.0006795799,0.00080147985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007412637,0.000010315683,0.43670824,0.000003885706,0.0000051165775,1.1815897e-7,0.0027116432,0.0000042876045,0.0003643908,0.004860516,0.5551968,0.000060545954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021440494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009498573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.933498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006781314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003449341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32411757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102654051","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0033","title":"The law’s own terms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Perspective (graphical); Liability; Framing (construction); Property (philosophy); Economic Justice; Relation (database)","score_opus":0.008273622615102337,"score_gpt":0.25890349847135896,"score_spread":0.2506298758562566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102654051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002268795,0.0002467298,0.00035140337,0.0070859357,0.00013924442,0.000046717807,0.0000026056657,0.000009816745,0.98984873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98123455,0.0005356758,0.00025187273,0.00013033554,0.000072559786,3.399644e-8,1.9878962e-7,0.0000010037675,0.01777376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962294,0.000050964947,0.000054685464,0.000045389956,0.000118883225,0.00010715625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968266,0.000054513184,0.000057205245,0.000085467975,0.00006761978,0.000052521315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026758306,0.000026876858,0.000046634126,0.0000033044153,0.0030856915,0.000056094872,0.00036727835,0.0000290367,0.0002983062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009164161,0.000021762353,0.000059835602,0.000021928057,0.00036403336,0.0002088007,0.00005110745,0.00007393742,0.00000560339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063667862,0.0000116184065,0.00009821673,6.734112e-7,0.0000141380715,0.000001113294,0.0019454991,0.0000019025312,0.000018677873,0.9905591,0.0039676772,0.0033750387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112304,0.00000589969,0.0007500031,0.0000076145493,0.0000115929015,4.527916e-7,0.010126685,0.000005320659,0.000010788539,0.006217159,0.98272747,0.000024722034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18064378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6559369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018338786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007166088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102710797","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0044","title":"Some leading themes in the contract scholarship of Stephen Waddams","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Certainty; Equity (law)","score_opus":0.023318244356577686,"score_gpt":0.29635687343484957,"score_spread":0.27303862907827187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102710797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40182313,0.0019933202,0.00018066337,0.0058423085,0.00012160002,0.00019619401,0.000009012471,0.000009720166,0.589824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986184,0.00032304518,0.00017010505,0.00008117602,0.000046093213,4.0362895e-8,2.2863786e-7,9.062752e-7,0.00076000206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994618,0.00013264336,0.00008974693,0.000049443912,0.00016281717,0.00010350173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961203,0.000117468066,0.00009573021,0.00007955474,0.000066676876,0.000028551869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065374037,0.0000318365,0.00008896611,0.000013586325,0.0005254186,0.00002747781,0.00044740958,0.000037253056,0.00016196682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003205553,0.000026949956,0.00006279331,0.00004367564,0.00018511419,0.00049900275,0.000030156656,0.00013037892,0.0000015598177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014889686,0.000049922408,0.003540123,0.0000037578818,0.000017957678,0.0000023504647,0.012752092,0.000011906122,0.00021073023,0.98125863,0.00021368451,0.0019239718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014253871,0.00006000067,0.08941894,0.0001975128,0.00008834765,0.0000025952254,0.15765828,0.00003753706,0.0002496535,0.037019726,0.7136817,0.00016032984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068617165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20408905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9442389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001521417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009736661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.937585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104179944","doi":"10.7202/1121365ar","title":"Qui dit contractuel ne dit pas toujours juste : quel avenir pour la théorie de l’imprévision en droit civil québécois post <i>Churchill Falls</i>  ?","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Civil servants; Context (archaeology); Civil rights","score_opus":0.004905053138466499,"score_gpt":0.22103094491935854,"score_spread":0.21612589178089203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104179944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38542023,0.0034169843,0.008629491,0.067655206,0.0006212809,0.00086392293,0.00037827433,0.00025942805,0.5327552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8325417,0.0042259116,0.000707281,0.0021257552,0.00077026396,0.000018183237,0.0000467869,0.000062699015,0.15950143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648106,0.00049676746,0.0005124846,0.00079249084,0.0004037456,0.0013134271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969649,0.0010524979,0.0003240404,0.0006869155,0.00026473223,0.0007069366],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010662974,0.00046194618,0.0005960824,0.00021075532,0.0011941482,0.00021283311,0.0012655192,0.0007772408,0.0004585755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027133248,0.0006126377,0.00054055994,0.00086683524,0.00046867388,0.00048523,0.0004632366,0.0009833659,0.00020961462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012143754,0.00041944484,0.0047713625,0.00033177208,0.00022582976,0.00034192702,0.012162381,0.0007996691,0.0042540575,0.95516694,0.006325898,0.015079301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001558373,0.00010198071,0.012326767,0.00087047345,0.0006505011,0.000101338934,0.013067039,0.0016585282,0.0006120123,0.052866336,0.91542554,0.0007611197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052871507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.129207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90909964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007451768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002161749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111970376","doi":"","title":"Common Law, Civil Law and the Future of Categories","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Civil procedure; Procedural law; Public law; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure","score_opus":0.01003124141926634,"score_gpt":0.26362427498373686,"score_spread":0.2535930335644705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111970376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24761944,0.0043680333,0.000016340662,0.035790615,0.0019492877,0.0011509162,0.00015841793,0.00008450007,0.7088625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922643,0.0006616182,0.00013385237,0.0030844826,0.001959815,0.00006571879,0.000008658298,0.000023649252,0.0017979154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772733,0.00028503835,0.0005324052,0.00042631454,0.00053047953,0.0004984014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979463,0.0003735071,0.00031939108,0.0008250081,0.00019157384,0.0003442044],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012571346,0.00027156595,0.00047651457,0.000016472377,0.0025503617,0.00049208716,0.0008928109,0.00035001367,0.00089153036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035673595,0.00019515195,0.00018874243,0.0003634657,0.006308037,0.00050853717,0.00032934043,0.001065229,0.000121695426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038418326,0.000079995174,0.00041268926,0.000033351724,0.000036659065,0.0000010338252,0.0042837774,0.0000018633109,0.00044556023,0.99327624,0.000884895,0.000505539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007504616,0.000030332978,0.00036925342,0.000017144532,0.0000749522,0.0000026970024,0.003390512,0.000020650534,0.00071947323,0.17959097,0.81481063,0.00022289672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080694534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61215454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81392574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027969125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016052385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113531864","doi":"","title":"Feminist Perspectives on Tort Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Duty; Feminist theory; Feminist legal theory; Feminism","score_opus":0.05810264907107749,"score_gpt":0.323405126971209,"score_spread":0.2653024779001315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113531864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037222912,0.00013444207,0.00012019254,0.0010514379,0.000100196565,0.0007707159,0.00034424057,0.000119901466,0.9936366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29508296,0.000565373,0.00053903525,0.000025481731,0.00022557801,1.7337338e-7,0.00006282571,0.000039162533,0.7034594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535,0.00040322752,0.00028300972,0.0009770924,0.0021597103,0.00082697626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960851,0.0006963329,0.0006460807,0.0009381685,0.0010770825,0.0005572065],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022721982,0.00035348945,0.0008079461,0.0008236997,0.0027667177,0.00005091463,0.0022012047,0.00075808534,0.0030031695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014616242,0.00050656276,0.0005897729,0.0006184248,0.006675424,0.00027511173,0.0007900749,0.0012690716,0.0003129291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017657694,0.00033675425,0.00009091942,0.00015540775,0.00019188489,0.00021550698,0.031031137,0.0000075541657,0.00006448036,0.87278557,0.09317693,0.0017673041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005054789,0.0003108502,0.0000745953,0.00033491422,0.00008668391,0.0000023851594,0.13485253,0.000019795845,0.000016935644,0.0018425876,0.8615547,0.00039853613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024390504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02451632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87094295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053097104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002336804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114050099","doi":"","title":"A brief introduction to law in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.008909002177812667,"score_gpt":0.2844586075321548,"score_spread":0.27554960535434214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114050099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042581197,0.0000051712013,0.00029706972,0.21143676,0.00014527475,0.00012541485,0.0000010775677,0.000014324551,0.7453937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820125,0.0000016232902,0.00014586271,0.003288504,0.00012437363,0.000013615962,4.442372e-7,6.0731696e-7,0.014412432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997341,0.000011721358,0.000047892605,0.00007141513,0.000057229416,0.00007763052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998802,0.000012656897,0.0000040898126,0.000060173385,0.000015652342,0.000027209293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008270755,0.000014985306,0.000025346118,0.000012430853,0.00010119649,0.000018452492,0.00006421172,0.000008174619,0.00014450056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024434035,0.000014691648,0.0000043724262,0.0002775683,0.000012855054,0.000033776512,0.000015364474,0.000025462123,0.000010070954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5760316e-7,0.0000032282048,0.00064527726,4.1346937e-7,4.5159314e-7,8.247173e-8,0.00018571696,0.00002631658,0.000022189877,0.9568812,0.04056503,0.0016696383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020945687,6.369941e-7,0.003271991,9.051162e-7,4.2422224e-7,9.514837e-9,0.000912572,0.000009239684,0.000100653444,0.00212117,0.9935431,0.000018345603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9992519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031454492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064981275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15821798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114825698","doi":"","title":"Honorarium Payments to Representative Plaintiffs: Doucet v The Royal Winnipeg Ballet","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballet; Payment; Wife; George (robot)","score_opus":0.030804744165582112,"score_gpt":0.3161618862225669,"score_spread":0.2853571420569848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114825698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32376775,0.0005149625,0.0003732363,0.1395869,0.0043026647,0.0053422903,0.00094858726,0.0008497055,0.5243139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911095,0.00014000187,0.00017685712,0.0050833295,0.001980657,0.0005449943,0.0000617322,0.00005829639,0.080859095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945986,0.0006883306,0.0007903671,0.0012210334,0.0013065576,0.0013950582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965226,0.000601392,0.0002957468,0.0013641586,0.00026565325,0.00095043407],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001892629,0.0004628863,0.00048007639,0.00009770779,0.0036294675,0.001312302,0.0020577624,0.00027274346,0.0032926959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004765503,0.00037421405,0.00033639043,0.0024031047,0.0008863681,0.00044730972,0.0011593968,0.00084797863,0.02014727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000974342,0.00025658685,0.0025455449,0.000029856199,0.00025485724,0.00004167744,0.02216751,0.002050643,0.00028764707,0.5408752,0.42979294,0.0016001114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060551084,0.00010108771,0.012223456,0.00006243955,0.000076143435,7.832047e-7,0.014549933,0.00057181914,0.00033380758,0.0057281624,0.96518844,0.000558398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031547334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010617028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5873273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029991922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039535513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116053611","doi":"10.1017/9781108953177.016","title":"Index","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Sample (material); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.027737756318313236,"score_gpt":0.24222750386494488,"score_spread":0.21448974754663164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116053611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008507259,0.000117887364,0.0013767022,0.000328693,0.0004899942,0.0009684101,0.0006103103,0.00016735074,0.99585557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036959775,0.000719174,0.00005469216,0.00019957138,0.0003360728,0.0000019646989,0.000028334893,0.000028486442,0.96167195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997443,0.00011010847,0.0003496033,0.00093739835,0.0005581816,0.0006016791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774134,0.00018689877,0.0003825038,0.0008871427,0.00037753454,0.00042459494],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024374803,0.0005183344,0.0005569337,0.0002382279,0.0018873726,0.00018067301,0.0015607859,0.0008348913,0.000051820854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024774343,0.00067765906,0.0004953328,0.00004405597,0.0012870278,0.00017510117,0.0010852375,0.00092476676,0.00008361031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048043617,0.000022922071,0.00001020967,0.00006491405,0.00016729532,0.000054311746,0.00024498388,0.0000037274203,0.000008555895,0.96844757,0.026432011,0.004495471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046947092,0.000023989815,0.00004888112,0.0001997879,0.00034338888,0.0000012140297,0.00047304117,0.00014020325,0.00004131445,0.000045104407,0.99758196,0.00063161785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005886369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007625542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051563245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007792543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116598787","doi":"","title":"Estoppel Without Regard to Equity? The Puzzling Omission of Promissory Estoppel’s Inequity Condition in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Supreme court; English law; High Court; Damages; Enforcement","score_opus":0.027501734284349186,"score_gpt":0.32694936950199416,"score_spread":0.29944763521764495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116598787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8598741,0.00056774035,0.00031582575,0.03387919,0.0009093802,0.0024283424,0.00012669724,0.000045428278,0.101853244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907216,0.000097080185,0.00030200573,0.0023296059,0.00021685232,0.00016377796,0.000014026436,0.00002074541,0.0061343503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960669,0.00045576072,0.001039924,0.0006996442,0.0009137861,0.00082396274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976371,0.00032948042,0.00040869927,0.00086497475,0.00028149027,0.0004782852],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019433227,0.00032776286,0.0005715609,0.00011171969,0.0011635789,0.0002193771,0.0013061059,0.00015530096,0.00037423265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074441894,0.00028231274,0.00014073402,0.0013932029,0.00036520173,0.0003939472,0.0007998391,0.0007863297,0.000053527416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023389215,0.0003747146,0.05845565,0.00041043514,0.000092361326,0.00001254089,0.004062356,0.002710005,0.0061044465,0.90512,0.011374271,0.011049297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002718122,0.00013943142,0.09313577,0.0026944205,0.0002558765,0.000003030659,0.014658704,0.0019930692,0.00987815,0.042086165,0.83108294,0.0013543082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95367664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8630339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020981997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074190605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117246958","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5962875","title":"&lt;p&gt;Structuring and Executing Real Estate Transactions - A Comparative Study of M&amp;amp;A, Private Equity Investments, Joint Ventures, and Due Diligence in India, The United States, The United Kingdom, Canada, and Singapore&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate; Real estate investment trust; Due diligence; Corporate Real Estate; Jurisdiction; Real estate development; Equity (law); Stock market; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05623347435947919,"score_gpt":0.33142967788909933,"score_spread":0.27519620352962015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117246958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945055,0.0011186181,0.00082526595,0.001103434,0.00017195284,0.0018796414,0.00013452987,0.000017447102,0.00024359813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673871,0.032072004,0.00007177015,0.00009643984,0.000072626826,0.0000734197,0.00005847055,0.000023166287,0.00014500946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992952,0.0017054133,0.0014391397,0.0007928947,0.00095261156,0.0021579443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967665,0.0006805292,0.0014223943,0.00054313475,0.00028966198,0.00029777776],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049171997,0.0006178339,0.0008367493,0.00045878647,0.0036156059,0.00050608034,0.0009194687,0.00022343453,0.000008335699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011616812,0.00045490006,0.000099508274,0.001763356,0.0011338595,0.00021910819,0.00066424883,0.004909026,2.002013e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006976832,0.0014976658,0.015545559,0.000518386,0.004238682,0.000036236328,0.56286633,0.057840943,0.001509377,0.33224642,0.00006472666,0.022937953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008122647,0.0010856917,0.35479197,0.0021606907,0.0029492537,0.000574551,0.30798396,0.013421515,0.0003250551,0.2469944,0.0581579,0.0034323297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78505665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96666956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33924642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022122895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006984482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117267312","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5962815","title":"&lt;p&gt;Structuring and Executing Real Estate Transactions - A Comparative Study of M&amp;amp;A, Private Equity Investments, Joint Ventures, and Due Diligence in India, The United States, The United Kingdom, Canada, and Singapore&lt;/p&gt;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate; Real estate investment trust; Due diligence; Corporate Real Estate; Jurisdiction; Real estate development; Equity (law); Stock market; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05823323271888954,"score_gpt":0.3378336781190865,"score_spread":0.27960044540019696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117267312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964844,0.00063148147,0.0005073646,0.0009025614,0.000094061725,0.0010246951,0.00007579052,0.000016588596,0.0002630556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883056,0.011302692,0.00006584253,0.00006925187,0.00004874673,0.0000452081,0.000043395314,0.000012746298,0.000106507345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963833,0.00085630803,0.00066826295,0.00040801257,0.0005421423,0.0011419833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984014,0.00034441426,0.00064205175,0.00031228038,0.00015111858,0.00014870222],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002797357,0.00030098672,0.00043035616,0.00026617665,0.0017999362,0.00027075314,0.0005155271,0.00012752488,0.000003374452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008301256,0.0002174764,0.000048528804,0.00077543076,0.0005145453,0.000105796644,0.00036394768,0.0027476607,8.2889635e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035129878,0.00083483447,0.018913299,0.00034899273,0.0024827407,0.000030512063,0.43126574,0.03891756,0.0008729613,0.48951668,0.0001248249,0.016340546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053192847,0.00052049547,0.36660716,0.001404769,0.0016188776,0.00025478844,0.17976333,0.005885944,0.00022288185,0.3597169,0.07628616,0.0023994106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7451572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96564424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34769386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012344117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041358303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117371820","doi":"10.1017/9781009652513.004","title":"Hertford College Oxford","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Subject (documents); Exposition (narrative)","score_opus":0.029135523259851942,"score_gpt":0.24177941721996357,"score_spread":0.21264389396011163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117371820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015741626,0.00014740898,0.0006025167,0.00047293806,0.0006378629,0.0016048144,0.002479046,0.00020859476,0.9936894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013828191,0.0015493402,0.00018007657,0.00026900007,0.00036400373,0.000004555189,0.000050105355,0.000042711737,0.983712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968432,0.00012800365,0.00047458406,0.0011192145,0.00064391305,0.00079107465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724734,0.00025518495,0.00046918873,0.001029461,0.0004596829,0.0005391544],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002992376,0.0006715183,0.0007524725,0.00026430594,0.0025728445,0.00015538435,0.0018404626,0.0009325954,0.000070507944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030558956,0.000859528,0.00066168216,0.00007030614,0.0013772736,0.00022958938,0.0012062364,0.0009466416,0.000055894674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009106865,0.000035110446,0.00000451566,0.0000974847,0.00022291871,0.00009779806,0.0002222063,0.0000022429085,0.000010711351,0.95117706,0.04488458,0.0031542883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006930129,0.000051260424,0.00001798093,0.0002566931,0.0005009787,0.0000025611878,0.000982924,0.000112173715,0.00006857871,0.00007267308,0.99642545,0.00081572187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003048225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013585987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072130247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010175516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117520968","doi":"","title":"Actual Uses Versus Paper Owners: The Ontario Court of Appeal’s Decision in Kosicki v Toronto (City) in Context","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02842413119442819,"score_gpt":0.3078785873821956,"score_spread":0.2794544561877674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117520968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82430845,0.0021947187,0.000059724807,0.005009091,0.0011464435,0.001203002,0.000034037253,0.0000283024,0.16601619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926444,0.0006691107,0.00014169722,0.0011871458,0.00016179708,0.00010537977,0.0000054403636,0.000015504898,0.0050695185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672675,0.00031704985,0.0009885603,0.0006350716,0.000658437,0.0006741031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972737,0.0013042361,0.00026674644,0.0007923338,0.000160205,0.000202808],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013252784,0.00032219331,0.00055452884,0.00007581919,0.00057038455,0.00026567295,0.0012306848,0.0003313981,0.00296416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044958494,0.00025220582,0.0002233168,0.0008051845,0.0007291581,0.0009711361,0.0003861542,0.0007163785,0.00011216279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011888836,0.0009783009,0.029445475,0.00003824406,0.00012544115,0.000008643155,0.036960103,0.00020414357,0.00031813644,0.9013912,0.003822191,0.025519243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00313896,0.00013246042,0.049844358,0.00043638732,0.00006435096,1.9995322e-7,0.025994213,0.000043384025,0.00020269172,0.0053115548,0.9144765,0.00035489624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84556925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91065437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020505642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014024742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117524944","doi":"","title":"Is Aboriginal Title to Submerged Land “Cognizable” to the Canadian Common Law? Lessons from Sea Country Litigation in Australia","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Indigenous; Legislation; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.026608535608123922,"score_gpt":0.34255628043773195,"score_spread":0.315947744829608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117524944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32465506,0.00032801557,0.000040678504,0.14414978,0.0014092408,0.0012808202,0.0025978766,0.00004734616,0.5254912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96432567,0.000034340883,0.00010544806,0.008621954,0.00040014094,0.00007848407,0.00006705614,0.000010804705,0.026356105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849004,0.00012355363,0.0002618843,0.00035413727,0.00029177679,0.00047859168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894154,0.000059325437,0.00004696316,0.00037799552,0.00009830901,0.00047583913],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042050303,0.00014933455,0.00017988699,0.000060422673,0.0010084182,0.0004441012,0.00050784677,0.00017537708,0.0031209157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002924356,0.00013997317,0.00004862394,0.000995667,0.00013194863,0.0001415372,0.000050418224,0.00039204105,0.0040581767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008567637,0.00003616272,0.022497252,0.000009787782,0.0000246755,0.0000034002053,0.0017919651,0.00008359986,0.00003406484,0.8200787,0.15513362,0.00029822183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013313639,0.000008765153,0.026166191,0.00007747733,0.000026496153,8.364708e-8,0.0003086957,0.00004257652,0.00015114246,0.007045835,0.9658758,0.00016382546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97620094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99618345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81303287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005183972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088185514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117979958","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-06858-3_9","title":"New Zealand and Manitoba Unexplained Wealth Law: Surveying the Rights Landscape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Property (philosophy); Liability; Real property; Property law; Property rights","score_opus":0.02198729222815175,"score_gpt":0.2788151382868991,"score_spread":0.2568278460587473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117979958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014345247,0.0008301244,0.000067524335,0.005891303,0.00046892473,0.00046828674,0.00009006884,0.0000684424,0.99197185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01463391,0.00059928454,0.000111997666,0.00035515474,0.0007959973,0.000011320487,0.000049950802,0.000015662356,0.98342675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889624,0.000052919702,0.00020905481,0.00030686174,0.0002751737,0.000259748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999188,0.0001712776,0.00012881713,0.00030436463,0.00006085636,0.00014665101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042730197,0.00017364451,0.00020273145,0.000044047913,0.0011649725,0.00023250953,0.00034289266,0.00019455024,0.00031401418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009629953,0.00012609146,0.00008077984,0.000049673938,0.00014233132,0.000060419003,0.00012238696,0.00026483706,0.00009166485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038420794,0.0000036519539,0.00010537519,0.00000953599,0.000031416737,0.0000024235032,0.00065762846,5.1159634e-7,0.0000010484865,0.90072477,0.097172834,0.0012869645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013263721,0.0000065444488,0.00026624402,0.000038750688,0.000045818113,7.9379197e-7,0.000093915034,0.0000048743877,0.0000016880886,0.061144486,0.938124,0.00014023569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043853994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2523928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84095114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052940883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025836428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9625131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125684045","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-008","title":"1.6 “Principles to Ensure the Law is Not Abused in Canada”","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Action (physics); Liability; Poison control; Tort","score_opus":0.04551611397754908,"score_gpt":0.2276473365338274,"score_spread":0.18213122255627834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125684045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013032095,0.00021666064,0.000037956834,0.002006385,0.00024029675,0.0010726509,0.00039632584,0.000028631594,0.99469787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2439106,0.00031987487,0.00011787626,0.0010773378,0.00010663997,0.000002234854,0.0000074862896,0.00003670416,0.75442123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747425,0.00007642255,0.00042402674,0.0006824966,0.00086996786,0.0004728597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982931,0.00023566504,0.00025143096,0.0007214028,0.00018232295,0.00031607275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033224907,0.00037095297,0.0005123727,0.00009224451,0.00076659693,0.000071044546,0.0015571698,0.00031820106,0.0004275352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008230904,0.00036803054,0.00026266644,0.000046773348,0.000866923,0.00007006698,0.0008146371,0.00078174635,0.000052177907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059221817,0.000010257863,0.000010321934,0.000069972164,0.00010659035,0.00006887304,0.014351143,0.000053009644,0.000027157157,0.98270357,0.0002983354,0.0022415568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022251758,0.000024194766,0.00013698748,0.0002762438,0.00017684541,0.0000010068451,0.0019458294,0.00029058105,0.00017197465,0.0014323015,0.9949251,0.00039641262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99567145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99462676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007119501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017872954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126973335","doi":"","title":"Flogging a dead maxim? The future viability of the ex turpi rule in Australian law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Maxim; Common law; Statutory law; Ex parte; Plaintiff; Scope (computer science); Cause of action; Legislature; Statute; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.01372084244336728,"score_gpt":0.25218927109673533,"score_spread":0.23846842865336806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126973335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8833568,0.00019517231,0.0000020185041,0.006940327,0.00089162483,0.0011032141,0.000032761152,0.000038221915,0.10743987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96602774,0.00008025228,0.000029538329,0.00012398242,0.00019459636,0.00000478889,0.000020313764,0.000013472228,0.03350534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967953,0.0013712514,0.00039935944,0.00039495886,0.0006884294,0.00035073393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739516,0.00039426115,0.00058414956,0.001256423,0.00028535785,0.00008467065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019195658,0.0002508494,0.00034949207,0.000067560206,0.0029287466,0.00010080055,0.003026788,0.00043007525,0.00005941034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015326386,0.00015021705,0.0004047948,0.0007689538,0.001043588,0.00024575708,0.00023258664,0.0012215028,0.000010230732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088976853,0.0010087945,0.03990033,0.0017539535,0.0009410298,0.00002872452,0.23054804,0.00067937165,0.018141476,0.69405025,0.004440249,0.007618023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007249903,0.000042337215,0.36765334,0.0011480146,0.00092496496,0.0000052889595,0.18634056,0.00003055329,0.008540897,0.015994916,0.41791293,0.00068122044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016247077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018568868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67805535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003384243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007739805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128186374","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v9i2.445","title":"Postscript to “Employment Class Actions: Is the Work Culture of Banks Under Attack?”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Overtime; Legislation; Class action; Working class; Class (philosophy); Work (physics); Labour law; Financial services","score_opus":0.11703182975526079,"score_gpt":0.3876080377037702,"score_spread":0.27057620794850945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128186374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004262882,0.013197552,0.00076333265,0.6924993,0.0010755302,0.002740278,0.00009893085,0.00008967089,0.28527254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8306463,0.029370848,0.00021786775,0.113533564,0.0006699139,0.00039243832,0.000023018709,0.000032218377,0.025113855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988729,0.00016787843,0.00024203456,0.00020239201,0.0002406484,0.00027414612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888647,0.000060622326,0.000115316,0.00038081175,0.00015370233,0.00040308532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048446946,0.000102122445,0.00017843072,0.000047348723,0.0006315601,0.00006497631,0.00031414547,0.00008013228,0.00077826367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013188377,0.00007617192,0.000117729294,0.00071297615,0.0000948171,0.000102614875,0.000018839171,0.00017885948,0.0003552072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016185818,0.0000193587,0.00021739636,0.00011478293,0.000033390843,1.8345956e-7,0.0013658218,0.000030745625,0.00006933047,0.18190958,0.7622481,0.053989705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031129875,0.0000094815305,0.0015922064,0.00029274766,0.00004012051,5.5540556e-7,0.0004797026,0.000003698721,0.000015836842,0.00012042179,0.9973192,0.000094889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056199376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33207417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8263834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004820236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003600532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95008546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128201290","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i1.103","title":"Whither Common Law Claims for Secondary Market Misrepresentation?: An Analysis of Certification Decisions in <i>McCann V CP Ships, Silver V Imax, Mckenna V Gammon Gold, and Dobbie V Arctic Glacier</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Statutory law; Common law; Jurisprudence; Meaning (existential); Cause of action; Certification; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.11737825005482269,"score_gpt":0.36785129838043035,"score_spread":0.2504730483256077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128201290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6964208,0.03512328,0.0013848811,0.037855916,0.0009439325,0.012036991,0.0023773129,0.00020968528,0.21364719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875254,0.009636181,0.0003226137,0.0014623138,0.000040643252,0.00023899594,0.00015088316,0.000015532672,0.0006074434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843377,0.00026643332,0.00048831734,0.00035162314,0.00018198299,0.00027786123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985559,0.00020330395,0.00023483542,0.00042176325,0.00018093378,0.00040325147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009216681,0.00012497252,0.00035517671,0.0002444834,0.0003007026,0.0000570696,0.00024046598,0.000104402185,0.0008729748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010705164,0.00012744639,0.00013909907,0.001032722,0.00020258897,0.00041194182,0.000014296693,0.0001413671,0.000008181266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018355498,0.0006855131,0.13258009,0.0019477495,0.0009796988,0.000009517972,0.012660548,0.00009222384,0.0016853642,0.4614224,0.031835508,0.3559178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002774161,0.000029344268,0.19229648,0.00030639383,0.0007470565,0.0000013644736,0.0016196291,0.00062055816,0.00005056645,0.0035146277,0.80023575,0.0003008383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2951032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9363712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76840025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034323367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031939687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9558462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128204548","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v5i2.268","title":"Narrowing Section 31(1): The Effects of the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in <i>Kerr V. Danier</i> On the Ontario Costs Regime","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.021535546056113013,"score_gpt":0.2768654842428559,"score_spread":0.2553299381867429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128204548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6663591,0.006975589,0.000013630471,0.21753794,0.0015308763,0.0039864634,0.000022515322,0.000016732713,0.10355712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912715,0.00226827,0.000004216848,0.005463735,0.000059079735,0.000030531788,0.0000013974038,0.000004406008,0.00089685526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988531,0.00022309541,0.00025042082,0.00013276673,0.00033577497,0.00020487368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889153,0.00038066882,0.00017422625,0.00036930948,0.0000756501,0.00010858702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007645654,0.00008160078,0.0001590466,0.000027506308,0.0005304493,0.000020712167,0.00037411888,0.00004904211,0.000049146118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045993054,0.000046111676,0.00007850064,0.00051987875,0.00007561085,0.00006752072,0.000010738589,0.00028499743,0.0000019380336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003226762,0.0001333331,0.005946832,0.000670386,0.000076363816,0.000010321338,0.0064415815,0.0003867124,0.002563388,0.24861206,0.6253869,0.10973988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062881445,0.000014236067,0.025721146,0.0013345741,0.000020453728,0.0000010881874,0.0001857165,0.000008557565,0.00017583936,0.000172971,0.9722435,0.00005902527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98962253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99989027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34685662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022733838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00325162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59448195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128208207","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v12i1.39","title":"Secondary Market Liability in Ontario: Interpreting the Leave Test Before and After <i>Theratechnologies</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Test (biology); Liability; Economic Justice; Legislative intent; Secondary market","score_opus":0.026534694326912644,"score_gpt":0.31059514158139895,"score_spread":0.2840604472544863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128208207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30410072,0.007259612,0.0000077511,0.24244045,0.00039953008,0.0020497676,0.00007476817,0.000070118986,0.4435973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892869,0.004576502,0.000023584447,0.0029176327,0.00003259282,0.00014824285,0.0000013492646,0.0000048339775,0.00300839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993651,0.000058626403,0.00014536157,0.00016954176,0.00006475999,0.00019659061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930954,0.00007035061,0.00009148826,0.00038391692,0.00003311505,0.000111581154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071134814,0.00006811847,0.00011716736,0.000021840966,0.0007707337,0.00018153699,0.0002892306,0.00006852532,0.00081305817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057417987,0.000051565832,0.000034407552,0.00006348338,0.00029857637,0.0001817898,0.00004550886,0.00033319142,0.00001609758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034699099,0.000016881573,0.7012383,0.00031689683,0.000010200117,0.000008669395,0.0017370079,1.3954535e-7,0.000011116876,0.00838176,0.014126425,0.27414915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022551523,0.0000035577536,0.24499482,0.00027255167,0.000004464817,7.06082e-7,0.00020014847,0.0000037098043,0.0000012336501,0.00039838854,0.75405157,0.000046337434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8179014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7399251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005897081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006218564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8902417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128220993","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v11i2.373","title":"Common Law Securities Misrepresentation Claims — Still with us in the Post- <i>Green</i> Era?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Common law; Damages; Supreme court; Statutory law; Class action; Certification; English law","score_opus":0.03935244128611594,"score_gpt":0.33256707909535366,"score_spread":0.29321463780923773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128220993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1667517,0.011894813,0.000033711873,0.5948377,0.00025220515,0.002720053,0.00020802903,0.00008222333,0.22321954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699627,0.013423037,0.00001509338,0.015431018,0.00012978152,0.00016034093,0.000015119118,0.000008237709,0.0008546786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902385,0.00022375306,0.00016657462,0.0001524952,0.0002024995,0.0002308296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993296,0.00012345299,0.000074259995,0.0002290113,0.00008238659,0.00016125372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039336743,0.00007662715,0.00012255434,0.000035889072,0.0003631199,0.000066736575,0.00022690053,0.00004317656,0.00022182435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000236117,0.000044762342,0.000041047046,0.00028761482,0.0001956564,0.00025700597,0.000006506063,0.00011366911,0.0000822577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008061035,0.00003738051,0.007840136,0.00033681816,0.000018643705,0.000016993325,0.0033527717,0.0000028910902,0.00010063898,0.8823288,0.018155424,0.08780144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008709318,0.000010472015,0.0070276703,0.00040030008,0.000015452451,0.0000038011854,0.00053804903,0.0000011918288,0.000007188949,0.00046200363,0.99136335,0.000083439736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5870274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027408966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032673875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41572264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128229737","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.449","title":"The Space Between Rule 20 and 21: The Evidentiary Burden on Certification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Test (biology); Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Common law; Space (punctuation); Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.0651739564324587,"score_gpt":0.35710822867018005,"score_spread":0.29193427223772134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128229737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022209732,0.011178884,0.000016302516,0.91257876,0.00062975544,0.0011826035,0.00003167479,0.000040450912,0.05213185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93313175,0.055217206,0.00001870803,0.0026546167,0.0011577703,0.00015289398,0.000015116403,0.000012124583,0.007639784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992918,0.000117865544,0.0001279253,0.00013641501,0.00014830352,0.00017771397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991228,0.00021909211,0.000082481885,0.00029903575,0.00005633858,0.00022024784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007864633,0.000058709717,0.00007491489,0.00001902002,0.0016710465,0.00017592318,0.0002453101,0.00004880768,0.00014263169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024337307,0.000036737605,0.00003916882,0.0001972194,0.00017471482,0.000096711854,0.000011390596,0.00024187776,0.00019574085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011199255,0.000005694022,0.0016366297,0.000109853645,0.000027683443,5.563347e-7,0.00061149953,0.000001557301,0.000425727,0.35467854,0.1910856,0.45141554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013736846,0.00000185839,0.008901789,0.00006142197,0.00002555132,4.6131584e-7,0.00015141928,0.000006040112,0.000010387573,0.00041856346,0.99035937,0.000049407303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08364655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5688166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91092205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009841721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002691711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128242591","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v13i1.005","title":"Questions About Leave Test for Secondary Market Claims Remain Unanswered After Court of Appeal Decision in <i>Rahimi V Southgobi Resources Ltd</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Issuer; Test (biology); High Court; Federal court; Court of record; Remand (court procedure)","score_opus":0.02316075692114236,"score_gpt":0.3274152954170828,"score_spread":0.3042545384959404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128242591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18265326,0.06677655,0.0044531636,0.13830297,0.003178905,0.016391566,0.006262561,0.00037373908,0.5816073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725568,0.015504124,0.0012636237,0.004294772,0.00063614594,0.00054759654,0.000036733178,0.000036033,0.005124121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984734,0.00014871555,0.00048497977,0.0003031332,0.00020651982,0.00038325158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854517,0.00032839703,0.00018474259,0.0003251349,0.00025194237,0.00036463712],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001240715,0.00013195019,0.00029529523,0.00015181479,0.00044320637,0.00005823994,0.0002614216,0.0001391093,0.0012537555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005856106,0.00013165799,0.00012814965,0.0005424352,0.00031283102,0.00017058759,0.000019873505,0.00018840098,0.00006714293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112383066,0.00020585168,0.010705703,0.0020886709,0.000058646645,0.000011599741,0.004068443,0.0000058353994,0.0004381361,0.033609234,0.6751319,0.2735636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016930548,0.000029603112,0.014440834,0.0013879917,0.000031270356,0.0000016475523,0.0003292355,0.000030513882,0.000010812758,0.0006686627,0.9827537,0.00014645225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04834764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8237198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7899036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047525304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010121943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128250771","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i1.99","title":"Some Reflections on The “Responsible Issuer” Definition and Jurisdictional Aspects of Securities Class Actions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Issuer; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Misrepresentation; Statutory law; Pleading; Legislation; Extraterritoriality","score_opus":0.19401747695125843,"score_gpt":0.3988025013583506,"score_spread":0.20478502440709218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128250771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0340727,0.03992742,0.000042280742,0.17271398,0.0013403682,0.0015436069,0.00031626777,0.00013028616,0.7499131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.929363,0.06485036,0.000056507015,0.0038030406,0.0006624897,0.00019366719,0.000018219447,0.000012289911,0.0010404405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989238,0.00022442978,0.00021151164,0.00013637116,0.00021653928,0.00028735993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990411,0.00022294077,0.000118885284,0.00019671749,0.00010112781,0.00031923605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005995893,0.0000948817,0.00014254556,0.00012759984,0.0012926277,0.000046309386,0.0001035749,0.000075767784,0.0006203944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001954991,0.00008099442,0.00007742336,0.00044372343,0.00022485692,0.0003596578,0.0000107627975,0.0002190992,0.00011312677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013983301,0.000021042008,0.00003504146,0.000060007224,0.000013358768,1.2526196e-7,0.00033830697,0.0000012693575,0.00007781492,0.98767114,0.010800363,0.0009801466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036638645,0.000012322436,0.002484561,0.0002128119,0.000046727208,0.000005173212,0.00080598437,0.0000026814146,0.00007334749,0.0092072375,0.987025,0.00008748121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027499305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16930905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037180312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006874989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128558076","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt of Agent Raiford&apos;s accounts for 2nd quarter of 1851","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.03215117005209569,"score_gpt":0.2813288892186946,"score_spread":0.2491777191665989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128558076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8682182,0.000056021967,0.00758444,0.0060910555,0.00022467515,0.00160745,0.00016850032,0.00020795077,0.11584172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98589146,0.00003524783,0.003916439,0.00018674204,0.00014908006,0.000005338564,0.000013882233,0.000013086584,0.009788709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897224,0.000053444437,0.0002068752,0.0002496433,0.00024304989,0.000274749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894524,0.00015791452,0.00020273027,0.0002927815,0.00031318897,0.00008815639],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002464414,0.000117975505,0.00022337098,0.00017759461,0.00035536598,0.00004864044,0.0006658951,0.00016320114,0.0010687001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056196728,0.00012249596,0.00013647537,0.00047132582,0.00032052724,0.00041488878,0.00012813715,0.00014171057,0.0001166002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022696661,0.0012239551,0.012872032,0.00029600976,0.0006325054,0.000010971417,0.04991578,0.0000567669,0.0792677,0.611331,0.19550891,0.048657425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005763154,0.00005690371,0.0022961728,0.000053777065,0.00006440304,9.981586e-8,0.0027335861,0.00008492617,0.008548969,0.009822187,0.97554564,0.00021703582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006000086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012226314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7800367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013218772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001409068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128561262","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt Agent Butler&apos;s accounts for 3rd quarter 1851","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.036341950101162965,"score_gpt":0.2834771959178825,"score_spread":0.24713524581671953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128561262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5740517,0.000112925096,0.025504483,0.048487816,0.0011248796,0.0040520574,0.00024283107,0.0016152693,0.34480804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410849,0.00006423425,0.0053314543,0.0016150017,0.00079709676,0.000022252814,0.000045807566,0.000033550637,0.0510057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985435,0.00007474343,0.00017106815,0.00042957792,0.0002879526,0.00049315713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988526,0.0001640511,0.000117977936,0.00042931605,0.00025500037,0.00018101571],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025893826,0.00017857307,0.00019877804,0.00018220699,0.0011672337,0.00028563404,0.00087576336,0.00023225434,0.0012587432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059149465,0.00018900319,0.00014620658,0.00052013114,0.00026057693,0.00070712063,0.00017512067,0.0002630942,0.0019224291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007400735,0.0005313414,0.0036649199,0.000052617994,0.0002808751,0.000025208314,0.02031192,0.000017381279,0.009531642,0.27198696,0.6623251,0.03119805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003705076,0.000027313092,0.00091601757,0.000023313269,0.00004176324,1.743346e-7,0.0016661296,0.00008551177,0.00087634916,0.008813707,0.9869114,0.0002677792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005477721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018443879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3670332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003624669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016637464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128564367","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt of Agent Raiford&apos;s accounts for 3rd quarter 1851","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03419729592582558,"score_gpt":0.28296341177861273,"score_spread":0.24876611585278716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128564367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7670368,0.0000747818,0.016774159,0.017972056,0.00047545845,0.0027014958,0.00020177847,0.00060615013,0.1941573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97431165,0.000045836954,0.0049414285,0.000556046,0.0003250113,0.000011029554,0.00002312312,0.00002022801,0.01976562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988044,0.000062293715,0.00018905509,0.00031895435,0.00026004371,0.00036527895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989584,0.00016176561,0.00015565206,0.00032227207,0.00027847654,0.00012341859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025627916,0.0001429446,0.00021060009,0.00018111794,0.0006340308,0.00011200485,0.00075980905,0.00019068853,0.0008273844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058421458,0.00014944741,0.00014426405,0.00049640407,0.0002850123,0.0005489395,0.00014681632,0.00018817389,0.00045556884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015443115,0.0008645693,0.0069975685,0.0001402805,0.0004606758,0.000016694317,0.035423797,0.000037910104,0.030485185,0.43993407,0.43924853,0.04623626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043636083,0.00003645134,0.0011761563,0.000031647087,0.000046033972,1.1351879e-7,0.0019106076,0.000080959064,0.002253451,0.009041124,0.98477256,0.00021451291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048635593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013576085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54552406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021555439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015440093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90592796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128578416","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt of Agent Butler&apos;s accounts for 2nd quarter 1851 &amp; 4th quarter 1850","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Receipt; Payment; Data collection","score_opus":0.03812939587639347,"score_gpt":0.286749084215751,"score_spread":0.24861968833935755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128578416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83128923,0.00007807991,0.019182673,0.018206159,0.00058481493,0.002547759,0.00024223182,0.00057753996,0.12729149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673205,0.000045943165,0.0057184286,0.0006424024,0.0004403934,0.000015568861,0.000052862928,0.000028253271,0.025735658],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983901,0.00009556408,0.00025578556,0.00043671895,0.00034582068,0.00047601844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985482,0.00019312213,0.00020285959,0.00054047233,0.00034920528,0.00016612172],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003172141,0.00020010675,0.00027903277,0.0002320418,0.0007472636,0.00017392627,0.0008806668,0.00025183518,0.0013986732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056789395,0.0002082807,0.00018610757,0.00055590586,0.00035351687,0.0006522219,0.00015289543,0.00026033065,0.00095576514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015319556,0.0009605409,0.007893626,0.00013955041,0.00048426207,0.000012826371,0.04622928,0.00003114385,0.027349167,0.15710036,0.7437532,0.015892854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004954429,0.000041059076,0.0014363277,0.000041335275,0.00006186279,2.1333095e-7,0.0021274947,0.000047961308,0.001092635,0.0068810633,0.9874855,0.0002890689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073210243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004165448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24373235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026237092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017269702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128579901","doi":"","title":"[Letter from Geo. W. Manypenny] Acknowledging receipt of Sub Agent Smithson&apos;s account for 2nd quarter of 1853","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.026631187123663486,"score_gpt":0.26871473073190816,"score_spread":0.24208354360824466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128579901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93217975,0.00006788234,0.005773699,0.005293933,0.00020546255,0.0014103047,0.0001217444,0.00018218165,0.054765027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908917,0.00007185978,0.0034663652,0.0001995641,0.00015609051,0.0000064954966,0.000013182161,0.000015990829,0.005178763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881727,0.00006391705,0.00023172524,0.0002933159,0.00027511202,0.00031868604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876124,0.000163277,0.00022726296,0.0003980594,0.00034521407,0.00010493797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028488808,0.0001378716,0.0002583591,0.00019833527,0.000310132,0.00004532705,0.0007284496,0.00018058653,0.0006796024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046654808,0.00014333194,0.00015317883,0.00049595727,0.00027731247,0.00041543186,0.00015013762,0.00016569711,0.00013723817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023401868,0.0013481607,0.020608345,0.00033223903,0.0006943622,0.000019309033,0.036039047,0.000048896898,0.09073468,0.61054456,0.20310917,0.036287215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007592389,0.00008971198,0.0073606186,0.00008305649,0.00011576758,2.2378029e-7,0.0037194293,0.00014802044,0.02369978,0.01514881,0.9485199,0.00035548452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059568128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015095583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7454107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018845877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013095966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9004959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128580615","doi":"","title":"[Letter from L. Lea] Acknowledging receipt of Agent Butler&apos;s accounts for 4th quarter 1852","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.03418998087225686,"score_gpt":0.2811431243256728,"score_spread":0.24695314345341593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128580615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7240258,0.00008078669,0.014829726,0.017462477,0.0005094292,0.0025752285,0.00021224073,0.00061038724,0.23969397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97291297,0.000055117,0.004239616,0.00049668585,0.00031954786,0.000009534535,0.000024632187,0.000019224286,0.021922676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883467,0.00006197703,0.00017799165,0.00031569932,0.0002584274,0.00035123233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989298,0.00015045055,0.00014872584,0.00037052194,0.0002791353,0.000121341545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023854178,0.0001383342,0.00020162003,0.00017129838,0.0004850526,0.00007993241,0.0007383588,0.0001838297,0.0008412918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053285006,0.0001446172,0.00013269132,0.00047681396,0.00021814363,0.00050456316,0.00014191556,0.00018551227,0.0004926143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012556734,0.0008891001,0.0073279375,0.00012687381,0.00045094217,0.00001690745,0.029879266,0.000037048096,0.039634086,0.4447869,0.44118673,0.035538632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040429342,0.000036541023,0.0010414037,0.00003322961,0.00004837709,1.13912506e-7,0.0019860226,0.0000808378,0.0034616,0.008362958,0.98432314,0.00022149118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052308883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013038393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5431364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021786972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012722221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9211555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128604295","doi":"10.26180/10064021","title":"Abolition or Reform: The Future for Directness as a Requirement of Trespass in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Set (abstract data type); Watson; Recklessness; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03703769275055159,"score_gpt":0.31234999788740825,"score_spread":0.27531230513685667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128604295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96434796,0.000036550773,0.000045055775,0.008041393,0.00032359388,0.0012414975,0.00014400981,0.00001277795,0.025807185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484347,0.00019903226,0.000062897554,0.00004195286,0.00015261477,0.000004042035,0.000009690857,0.0000048258185,0.051090226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886084,0.00012334356,0.00018569856,0.00026950217,0.00026752366,0.0002930746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925023,0.00007608067,0.00018655162,0.00028680067,0.00012605771,0.00007427712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004600719,0.000113572685,0.00019329274,0.000060402675,0.0003783051,0.000025142159,0.0005005152,0.00014452469,0.0005716772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011593183,0.00008616167,0.00012699806,0.0005990726,0.00019043582,0.0002759169,0.00011422001,0.00013330363,0.00004128611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00116672,0.0005011777,0.0061518634,0.00017012995,0.00007326553,0.0000065341032,0.01812533,0.00010826109,0.0008525887,0.96465224,0.0016049749,0.0065868907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001342539,0.0001850754,0.058901887,0.000071003495,0.00006795234,3.959408e-7,0.062178135,0.00022289596,0.00046827382,0.0026900924,0.8736461,0.00022564849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01782202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018643698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96196216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062514335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024306797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128608677","doi":"10.26180/10065230","title":"The Australian PPSA from a Canadian Perspective: Some Comparative Reflections","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Position (finance); Security interest; Legislature; Falling (accident); Collateral","score_opus":0.04450877372500308,"score_gpt":0.31839299242033486,"score_spread":0.2738842186953318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128608677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52048355,0.00016355429,0.000011174359,0.047456264,0.00066942757,0.00076584285,0.00048845646,0.00005189686,0.42990983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9026543,0.00022005769,0.00004261241,0.00012952228,0.0002120965,0.0000010578761,0.0000103784705,0.0000061906694,0.096723795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829185,0.00026496316,0.0001276537,0.00046933145,0.000278416,0.00056777406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849796,0.00021070773,0.00011302559,0.00042448065,0.00024296227,0.00051087135],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019372588,0.00017232525,0.00019361297,0.00008490576,0.004988422,0.00021515557,0.00080231216,0.0001684714,0.0011314905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000146736775,0.00016998415,0.00016133508,0.00074255036,0.0006386008,0.00047451464,0.00012390748,0.00045389318,0.001809183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000268975,0.00006133635,0.0024586928,0.0000010814747,0.0001386947,0.0000071945487,0.039730195,0.000080574624,0.00019964807,0.94705224,0.010123224,0.00012023322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021206483,0.000026839978,0.020967284,0.00000759675,0.000048916474,1.9129345e-7,0.18574996,0.00010868497,0.0000349227,0.007196328,0.7854552,0.00019195283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.928003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92030597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025665187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013805921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128620998","doi":"10.26180/10064021.v1","title":"Abolition or Reform: The Future for Directness as a Requirement of Trespass in Australia","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Set (abstract data type); Watson; Recklessness; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03703769275055159,"score_gpt":0.31234999788740825,"score_spread":0.27531230513685667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128620998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96434796,0.000036550773,0.000045055775,0.008041393,0.00032359388,0.0012414975,0.00014400981,0.00001277795,0.025807185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484347,0.00019903226,0.000062897554,0.00004195286,0.00015261477,0.000004042035,0.000009690857,0.0000048258185,0.051090226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886084,0.00012334356,0.00018569856,0.00026950217,0.00026752366,0.0002930746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925023,0.00007608067,0.00018655162,0.00028680067,0.00012605771,0.00007427712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004600719,0.000113572685,0.00019329274,0.000060402675,0.0003783051,0.000025142159,0.0005005152,0.00014452469,0.0005716772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011593183,0.00008616167,0.00012699806,0.0005990726,0.00019043582,0.0002759169,0.00011422001,0.00013330363,0.00004128611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00116672,0.0005011777,0.0061518634,0.00017012995,0.00007326553,0.0000065341032,0.01812533,0.00010826109,0.0008525887,0.96465224,0.0016049749,0.0065868907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001342539,0.0001850754,0.058901887,0.000071003495,0.00006795234,3.959408e-7,0.062178135,0.00022289596,0.00046827382,0.0026900924,0.8736461,0.00022564849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01782202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018643698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96196216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062514335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024306797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128627839","doi":"10.26180/10065230.v1","title":"The Australian PPSA from a Canadian Perspective: Some Comparative Reflections","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personal property; Position (finance); Security interest; Legislature; Falling (accident); Collateral","score_opus":0.04450877372500308,"score_gpt":0.31839299242033486,"score_spread":0.2738842186953318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128627839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52048355,0.00016355429,0.000011174359,0.047456264,0.00066942757,0.00076584285,0.00048845646,0.00005189686,0.42990983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9026543,0.00022005769,0.00004261241,0.00012952228,0.0002120965,0.0000010578761,0.0000103784705,0.0000061906694,0.096723795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829185,0.00026496316,0.0001276537,0.00046933145,0.000278416,0.00056777406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849796,0.00021070773,0.00011302559,0.00042448065,0.00024296227,0.00051087135],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019372588,0.00017232525,0.00019361297,0.00008490576,0.004988422,0.00021515557,0.00080231216,0.0001684714,0.0011314905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000146736775,0.00016998415,0.00016133508,0.00074255036,0.0006386008,0.00047451464,0.00012390748,0.00045389318,0.001809183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000268975,0.00006133635,0.0024586928,0.0000010814747,0.0001386947,0.0000071945487,0.039730195,0.000080574624,0.00019964807,0.94705224,0.010123224,0.00012023322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021206483,0.000026839978,0.020967284,0.00000759675,0.000048916474,1.9129345e-7,0.18574996,0.00010868497,0.0000349227,0.007196328,0.7854552,0.00019195283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.928003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92030597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025665187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013805921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128698615","doi":"10.26180/4669552.v1","title":"The abolition of the doctrine of extended common purpose","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Doctrine; Mistake; Common law; Strict liability; Context (archaeology); Criminal law; Complicity; Mens rea; Liability","score_opus":0.013939437200441083,"score_gpt":0.2934592675692236,"score_spread":0.2795198303687825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128698615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8025815,0.00018557617,0.000011779045,0.0012898331,0.0004832417,0.00083006365,0.00019350587,0.0000117785585,0.19441274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94615126,0.0013034353,0.000008461696,0.0000064568494,0.000059027727,0.000001435522,0.00004136648,0.0000061738906,0.052422404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845016,0.0002650939,0.00028866937,0.0002456051,0.0005150387,0.00023545492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972075,0.00018860034,0.0012653597,0.0008585688,0.00040556886,0.00007436144],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046153084,0.00016149067,0.0002886229,0.000043739412,0.0038334327,0.000047506826,0.0019081746,0.00022388152,0.000065317756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007598186,0.00011883871,0.0003386355,0.000312186,0.0010896052,0.00018016082,0.00018442544,0.00031779165,0.0000074731715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029012078,0.00039944352,0.0038456356,0.00012913633,0.00014504991,0.000002345986,0.014372308,0.00003180054,0.002238254,0.9391111,0.000636318,0.038798448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056920666,0.00005468016,0.42266646,0.00016206923,0.0003252992,3.3894952e-7,0.030954935,0.000102106635,0.0049267276,0.00778598,0.5321877,0.0002644806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0136555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014758288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93132514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012345932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004232825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99746346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128701368","doi":"10.26180/4669552","title":"The abolition of the doctrine of extended common purpose","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Doctrine; Mistake; Common law; Strict liability; Context (archaeology); Criminal law; Complicity; Mens rea; Liability","score_opus":0.013939437200441083,"score_gpt":0.2934592675692236,"score_spread":0.2795198303687825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128701368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8025815,0.00018557617,0.000011779045,0.0012898331,0.0004832417,0.00083006365,0.00019350587,0.0000117785585,0.19441274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94615126,0.0013034353,0.000008461696,0.0000064568494,0.000059027727,0.000001435522,0.00004136648,0.0000061738906,0.052422404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845016,0.0002650939,0.00028866937,0.0002456051,0.0005150387,0.00023545492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972075,0.00018860034,0.0012653597,0.0008585688,0.00040556886,0.00007436144],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046153084,0.00016149067,0.0002886229,0.000043739412,0.0038334327,0.000047506826,0.0019081746,0.00022388152,0.000065317756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007598186,0.00011883871,0.0003386355,0.000312186,0.0010896052,0.00018016082,0.00018442544,0.00031779165,0.0000074731715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029012078,0.00039944352,0.0038456356,0.00012913633,0.00014504991,0.000002345986,0.014372308,0.00003180054,0.002238254,0.9391111,0.000636318,0.038798448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056920666,0.00005468016,0.42266646,0.00016206923,0.0003252992,3.3894952e-7,0.030954935,0.000102106635,0.0049267276,0.00778598,0.5321877,0.0002644806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0136555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014758288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93132514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012345932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004232825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99746346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7130499867","doi":"","title":"A Statutory Response to Intrusion upon Seclusion:Does Australia provide a model for reform in England and Wales?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Tort; Legislation; Common law; Intrusion; Punitive damages","score_opus":0.07535171422748112,"score_gpt":0.39148942645558454,"score_spread":0.31613771222810344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7130499867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97820544,0.00004634767,0.0037403828,0.014682201,0.00002619362,0.0011162836,0.00009435274,0.00002464437,0.0020641743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96607745,0.000080087266,0.0023634539,0.000029272764,0.00001720905,0.000008443222,0.000006001004,0.000005328881,0.03141277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984093,0.0003075067,0.00014049446,0.00034097256,0.00041631027,0.0003854163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884784,0.00032135152,0.00005406084,0.0002401362,0.00033969188,0.00019693795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00300987,0.000077612196,0.00017978704,0.00046476457,0.000993833,0.000046080077,0.0004352101,0.00011751531,0.000017608163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005627717,0.00008330741,0.000047925223,0.0007095218,0.00038851352,0.000240713,0.00043145692,0.00023824435,0.000006476295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029869907,0.0015660482,0.010809704,0.001361042,0.00012328249,0.00015353358,0.3732115,0.00089004164,0.03134246,0.33846706,0.037557192,0.17464823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015520053,0.00015667196,0.013878461,0.00016754225,0.000012870393,5.0301946e-7,0.027015116,0.01177496,0.00007472741,0.008531898,0.9366407,0.00019453804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04538692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16413935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8990835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010765179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087717944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9609699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132860814","doi":"","title":"A Rudderless Regime: The United Kingdom&apos;s &quot;Enlightened Shareholder Value&quot; as a Model for the Duty of Loyalty in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Corporation; Duty; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Duty of loyalty; Legislature","score_opus":0.09071302602882096,"score_gpt":0.4095601957237712,"score_spread":0.31884716969495025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132860814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94951034,0.0003000576,0.00041803552,0.024672693,0.000591706,0.0030505825,0.00018269158,0.00005103031,0.021222848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548197,0.00008551458,0.00019809554,0.0005008788,0.00016431033,0.0005115282,0.00026802035,0.000042483916,0.043409463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998182,0.00010775651,0.00034289548,0.00034061103,0.0006056871,0.0004210726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978984,0.00064494106,0.00041121987,0.0006101745,0.00033401122,0.00010124676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006446692,0.0002316168,0.00029701763,0.00007921294,0.00079758454,0.00008948342,0.001068898,0.00027910547,0.00011118847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003188092,0.0001502853,0.00013392289,0.0006418623,0.00013486113,0.000060805967,0.000047997564,0.0005977647,0.0000043516534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030668703,0.00018604542,0.00026895138,0.0002659952,0.00019549316,0.000004195076,0.23244478,0.011305733,0.0009070887,0.72413474,0.027545197,0.0024350814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015956598,0.000044965418,0.0040837023,0.0004148875,0.00045243846,0.0000016931524,0.2385024,0.15038262,0.0013286434,0.013822603,0.5881563,0.0012140922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98405725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99655557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7103121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002596886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049391715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8761878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132883421","doi":"","title":"A change in Canadian corporate governance philosophy: The importation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act into Canadian corporate governance","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Issuer; Corporate security; Control (management); Stakeholder; Agency cost; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.061586501263323594,"score_gpt":0.3544750053373577,"score_spread":0.2928885040740341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132883421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.889205,0.0024072146,0.0000023839452,0.041255895,0.0018184914,0.003935007,0.0005719204,0.000025144025,0.060778983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98810285,0.0016110598,0.000033273205,0.0013852873,0.0005934021,0.00025932657,0.0002450021,0.00007052359,0.0076992577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954573,0.00030499484,0.00096138596,0.00081582466,0.0011057814,0.0013547324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932689,0.000168167,0.004194248,0.0010235822,0.00050524494,0.0008398272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016672534,0.0006090199,0.0006066317,0.00015963291,0.0016944517,0.00018060805,0.0018884016,0.00065408833,0.0003605502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031936873,0.00048439373,0.00027413445,0.0031771811,0.0006643944,0.000398638,0.000056676625,0.0011103252,0.000094991476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001445362,0.00014089842,0.14449345,0.00032631145,0.00012994588,0.00007332859,0.2288696,0.0002937048,0.00036928122,0.6153853,0.0018437207,0.0079299025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042892457,0.000059802307,0.86480486,0.0006733627,0.000111450136,0.0000026006292,0.009697717,0.0007001607,0.00029811604,0.0070995875,0.1152633,0.00086012145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99923635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99993795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7203114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029297923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011066302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132886509","doi":"","title":"Directors Duties under the CBCA:Shareholder Theory versus Stakeholder Theory Consideration of Stakeholder Theory&apos;s Legal and Moral Supremacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Stakeholder theory; Stakeholder; Statutory law; Shareholder; Corporate law; Stakeholder analysis","score_opus":0.16590764551146792,"score_gpt":0.3954824350750255,"score_spread":0.2295747895635576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132886509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7441749,0.0058211843,0.0002202843,0.0017740421,0.0015262511,0.001548094,0.00015511276,0.00019355738,0.24458656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9350221,0.00021692314,0.000054741475,0.00014541132,0.00046139545,0.00012785288,0.00025137863,0.0000726289,0.063647576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633515,0.0013384795,0.0004770957,0.0005039157,0.000739254,0.0006061013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961705,0.0021996705,0.0005119381,0.0006076756,0.00032072354,0.0001894919],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025700596,0.00044796782,0.00047150228,0.00012993655,0.0012593187,0.00034293413,0.00046065892,0.00041350184,0.0029857282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000437036,0.0003408992,0.00018217636,0.00031257077,0.0009056234,0.00049759477,0.000080419806,0.0005983445,0.00003084687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003959851,0.000087020046,0.00012997526,0.00006605358,0.00019142378,0.0000010101282,0.06830786,0.000019838399,0.00038374378,0.926938,0.0011491387,0.0023299395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001900141,0.0001244624,0.027010154,0.00025510808,0.0010918234,0.0000036579845,0.7403086,0.000011706677,0.0039730254,0.15037164,0.07356817,0.0013814985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003021312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009195301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7765664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013724704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058817526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132913405","doi":"","title":"Horizontal application of fundamental rights in India","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Private law; Private rights; State (computer science); Autonomy; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.015513052789194225,"score_gpt":0.4038955415449337,"score_spread":0.38838248875573944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132913405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7683271,0.00020530602,0.0002901251,0.00013273988,0.0003127481,0.0012659754,0.000021986474,0.000028117003,0.22941586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921381,0.00008812281,0.00035412557,0.000020628346,0.0002850695,0.0001323074,0.00041412888,0.000020889811,0.0065466235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973507,0.00009726161,0.0007347813,0.0005772914,0.0007319642,0.0005080209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984198,0.00013609591,0.00074388983,0.00037051403,0.00014688345,0.00018281698],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007095212,0.00031431208,0.00045947803,0.00030454516,0.0004331513,0.00005564044,0.0005522721,0.0005840238,0.00035025744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022940574,0.00034177687,0.00017945928,0.0012614923,0.0002783276,0.00016555087,0.00005010324,0.0005087709,0.00020968325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002810789,0.0014894978,0.016930537,0.00028794564,0.00009176193,0.000007890423,0.22520411,0.000018160112,0.019151596,0.72225916,0.00021209124,0.014066169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018399694,0.00036344558,0.38361382,0.00039450053,0.0001987581,0.0000023287405,0.20456864,0.0005969965,0.016554426,0.005984751,0.3842374,0.0016449542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06582834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03742671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7162744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003812307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003239649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132934352","doi":"","title":"Justifying the Line in the Sand: Remoteness in Canadian Tort Law","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Tort; Liability; Duty of care; Relation (database); Supreme court; Common law; Strict liability","score_opus":0.06692074647929303,"score_gpt":0.42777384352569975,"score_spread":0.3608530970464067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132934352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61387646,0.0006526832,0.0000082094575,0.0891905,0.0012902741,0.0022137377,0.000023841923,0.00004777217,0.2926965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788254,0.0005434362,0.000014081905,0.001223199,0.000449123,0.00014038445,0.000114533344,0.000028842536,0.018660983],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976049,0.0003411424,0.00038985148,0.00041393586,0.00048749545,0.00076268363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862355,0.0004721305,0.00016779518,0.00048659436,0.000083201194,0.00016670083],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002407602,0.00023188573,0.00025038765,0.00013191387,0.0014540155,0.00030937398,0.001149653,0.00032424807,0.00011824581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021827628,0.00015864163,0.00009790745,0.0019254509,0.00019637763,0.00009029356,0.00003920781,0.00082412985,0.00017761113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020488786,0.000059472008,0.0012556256,0.000094081144,0.00001838926,0.0000439244,0.68290514,0.00086855795,0.000057203324,0.3091853,0.0012954356,0.00419639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021885507,0.000016516895,0.04196229,0.00021904691,0.000052978823,0.0000010632094,0.44875965,0.0008370688,0.000026655627,0.0022891967,0.5052152,0.00040146464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99228626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5039198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003959757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015050966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132940286","doi":"","title":"Fault and &apos;Reasonable Steps&apos;: The Troubling Implications of Morrison and Barton","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Fault (geology); Criminal law","score_opus":0.06220610343093899,"score_gpt":0.41522309363075693,"score_spread":0.3530169901998179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132940286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91188776,0.00032898772,0.00015267165,0.020792967,0.000024623441,0.00034035605,0.0000058702594,0.000025180421,0.066441566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912343,0.00018666906,0.0002934752,0.0001029132,0.000043821503,0.000020300457,0.0000017049259,0.0000053930053,0.00811139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999474,0.000037992246,0.000088783716,0.0001405236,0.00011323937,0.00014546092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948454,0.00013684786,0.000063365624,0.00019755689,0.000055689514,0.00006202245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002765557,0.00005267162,0.00008564376,0.000017065604,0.00033381258,0.00006421546,0.00013254833,0.000041980427,0.00007603587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037274523,0.000039470764,0.000020290348,0.00016199498,0.00013680593,0.00010082057,0.000056893205,0.00007524059,0.000016955848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009839027,0.000052999963,0.03733217,0.000028018649,0.000020521275,9.4239134e-8,0.042344123,0.000049403894,0.0083646,0.9017795,0.0020424197,0.007976348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052347727,0.000063783926,0.095462345,0.00003315562,0.000050934508,0.0000025641616,0.054424226,0.0009882407,0.0010795973,0.006817089,0.84030974,0.0002448633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005063917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096010556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8949624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017293003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049578535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76551616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132985053","doi":"","title":"The Weakest Link? Evaluating Private Nuisance Liability in Ontario&apos;s Environmental Law Context","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Nuisance; Tort; Liability; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Common law; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.09164700245362063,"score_gpt":0.4391386111396704,"score_spread":0.3474916086860498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132985053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88322383,0.0008446124,0.0000041191456,0.0031113059,0.0007652237,0.0019357397,0.000016358454,0.000034768644,0.11006404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381508,0.00021168165,0.00014348602,0.00016079262,0.00032657332,0.0003407806,0.00015843177,0.00003967902,0.060467727],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541277,0.0006229486,0.0008920766,0.0009375902,0.0012883552,0.00084628287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722666,0.00068172056,0.00077017705,0.00088472065,0.00012178891,0.00031496002],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035686577,0.00048789094,0.00051324745,0.000033279004,0.0023365356,0.0004202748,0.0011031014,0.0004942928,0.0006031712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038434193,0.00042227312,0.00021024176,0.00031587217,0.0010228571,0.00026612633,0.0001793849,0.0014816582,0.0005063001],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034500103,0.0006316546,0.019565016,0.000068238514,0.00009536615,0.0000047445255,0.7249649,0.00033541006,0.0024067876,0.21107891,0.00031522766,0.040188737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000942741,0.00019603192,0.05615723,0.00021423609,0.00010756724,6.5909074e-7,0.19667946,0.00057993975,0.0002940749,0.012807917,0.7311673,0.0008528049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51643395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9498833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7308521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024627205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015159812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132992230","doi":"","title":"Indeterminacy and the Canadian Supreme Court’s Approach to Corporate Fiduciary Duties&quot;","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Supreme court; Rebuttal; Mistake","score_opus":0.06044256719250178,"score_gpt":0.33229891107892556,"score_spread":0.27185634388642377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132992230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15576021,0.000100525824,0.000128955,0.12485755,0.00005889726,0.00066453125,0.0000071314853,0.000050615025,0.71837157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98568153,0.000018877026,0.00043161213,0.0026513305,0.00013804338,0.000020794252,0.000002575257,0.0000041706617,0.0110510895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928045,0.00007115509,0.000075697135,0.00015331822,0.00015972572,0.00025963204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942553,0.00003917758,0.000044746634,0.00018664791,0.000045302866,0.00025858777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004985917,0.00006682205,0.000090375695,0.00003396393,0.000908866,0.0001622296,0.00023008544,0.000054674783,0.000035728397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006477705,0.00004978042,0.00002254361,0.00021881453,0.00022532714,0.000064005115,0.00002439394,0.00011210858,0.000037649002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012001189,0.000020095507,0.0006397785,0.0000019387064,0.0000047383633,0.0000015215526,0.058806017,0.000020691828,0.00001583629,0.92186236,0.0152084725,0.003406517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057224196,0.00003593813,0.03539678,0.000010023755,0.000023852393,0.0000042185175,0.017828697,0.0005855271,0.00003653465,0.034146532,0.9110577,0.00030192465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4116363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4805895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8958492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000950296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032524666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69903547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133010827","doi":"","title":"Judicial activism in the law of negligence","year":2006,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial activism; Criticism; Supreme court; Judicial opinion; Common law; Liability; Private law; Judicial review; Tort","score_opus":0.03230427509076785,"score_gpt":0.40677136392613544,"score_spread":0.3744670888353676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133010827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40111646,0.0002691103,0.00005973644,0.00257345,0.0002670934,0.00070334616,0.000009097063,0.000012943484,0.59498876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894964,0.0001863265,0.00004977008,0.00014785146,0.0003651982,0.00007717561,0.00004932251,0.000013934571,0.0096139945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803084,0.000232667,0.00040041286,0.0003297165,0.00065406965,0.00035226837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987652,0.00026927862,0.0004508151,0.00035470465,0.00011521735,0.000044796278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006195968,0.00020155993,0.00029642854,0.000057586352,0.00056730927,0.00008425455,0.00081927056,0.00028599033,0.00012309142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049034858,0.00016716556,0.0001458498,0.00088184845,0.000393419,0.000116927586,0.000030001773,0.0004525986,0.00004446044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024465922,0.00027118193,0.00012396801,0.00004577921,0.000011255347,0.0000021102326,0.21120337,0.000085420026,0.001558652,0.78409207,0.00076665403,0.0018150776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000523758,0.00014912595,0.029936632,0.00041524746,0.00019532554,9.4472125e-7,0.5123441,0.00022722263,0.006867473,0.026839599,0.42157707,0.0009235012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20599018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12217686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75725245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006310673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035656706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89384115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133045566","doi":"","title":"Efficiency of market mechanisms in mutual fund trusts","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mutual fund; Fund administration; Corporate governance; Investment fund; Sovereign wealth fund; Target date fund; Closed-end fund","score_opus":0.03123356861846071,"score_gpt":0.38183202634101093,"score_spread":0.3505984577225502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133045566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43739417,0.00036888753,0.0007167025,0.00040755238,0.000660839,0.0009866513,0.000019669586,0.000024069055,0.5594215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8368863,0.0003847971,0.0005481537,0.000043886255,0.0000610438,0.00007246242,0.000038730228,0.000030261477,0.1619344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698067,0.0003265631,0.00068451604,0.00062444125,0.0007676885,0.0006161313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983814,0.00022302134,0.00059988454,0.0004248708,0.00018511162,0.00018573356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011870386,0.00034506767,0.0005471428,0.0002244931,0.00038764626,0.000071063725,0.0006325517,0.0005369051,0.004641479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002084333,0.00037646538,0.00020519448,0.0014696133,0.00021337644,0.00011474922,0.0000449172,0.0004584814,0.00013204632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019890613,0.0013317241,0.0003650354,0.00044489795,0.00006569633,0.000010681306,0.2185712,0.00011841322,0.0089770695,0.7633435,0.0021051907,0.004467652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027246207,0.00061831775,0.010557607,0.00092697993,0.00036033217,0.0000037597408,0.7644651,0.0027176335,0.020912426,0.019107914,0.17490202,0.0027033216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005123214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00617637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74423563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016760261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133053065","doi":"","title":"Private Oppression: An Account of Motive and Purpose in Anglo-Canadian Private Liability","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deakin University; GlaxoSmithKline","keywords":"Tort; Liability; Strict liability; Normative; Element (criminal law); Oppression; Action (physics); Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.02716538649718372,"score_gpt":0.37280450266574555,"score_spread":0.34563911616856186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133053065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772119,0.0006279139,0.00001330931,0.0013865664,0.00024544343,0.0012511013,0.000071175025,0.000017500655,0.019175122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444413,0.00092219113,0.00048268327,0.00007520449,0.00013108952,0.00010522435,0.00025357518,0.000029907622,0.0035559668],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695265,0.0004011096,0.0006162544,0.0009129833,0.00050596235,0.000611058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771446,0.00014284399,0.00047194364,0.00069388346,0.00034789118,0.0006289896],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009430595,0.00036279697,0.0006111304,0.00019609995,0.0005684095,0.0002076611,0.0005908844,0.0005630048,0.00063680444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035966857,0.00038471562,0.00011335339,0.0010932422,0.00039773175,0.0004294865,0.00013225306,0.0005689108,0.000012370872],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021413251,0.0013917637,0.08143163,0.0011412652,0.00013649989,0.000055633183,0.7129757,0.00021592886,0.0133120045,0.16110608,0.00013500251,0.02788437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009689193,0.00020867934,0.6609534,0.0011303991,0.00015748525,0.0000020111245,0.20947115,0.00076822087,0.0070306626,0.005993995,0.11199542,0.001319668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28446683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53317994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5795218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031934242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014572537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133060407","doi":"","title":"Social investing by private trustees","year":2005,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Impact investing; Statutory law; Statute; Prudence; Social contract; Socially responsible investing; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.04090524341204895,"score_gpt":0.4136877056162896,"score_spread":0.37278246220424066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133060407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50779796,0.0006213598,0.000060075963,0.010435413,0.00035400514,0.0007495024,0.000024025674,0.00017043341,0.47978723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77071637,0.00038291948,0.00035804097,0.00033143995,0.0021525542,0.00010856675,0.00034096255,0.00006205018,0.22554709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970706,0.00019407687,0.00053905323,0.0006814216,0.000755564,0.000759263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998471,0.00013386463,0.00070644374,0.00025893838,0.00016540203,0.00026435498],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051719655,0.00042796906,0.0004515855,0.00007385976,0.0029733852,0.00039616477,0.00074988377,0.0006473186,0.0011847137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017074608,0.00048419213,0.00023884914,0.00055557746,0.000344907,0.00024219029,0.00008312533,0.00069834106,0.00059838954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003965688,0.00031773836,0.0004258134,0.00018553533,0.00012790291,0.0000020436469,0.6665776,0.000015422991,0.010547009,0.2460288,0.05372219,0.022010338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025856265,0.000024263403,0.0008854328,0.000068986395,0.00008616029,3.2863545e-7,0.10251045,0.000085637934,0.0014657397,0.000902756,0.893056,0.00065568334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040458958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003790676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8393338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022588561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004920899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134582103","doi":"","title":"<em>Chevron</em> Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Chevron (anatomy); Agency (philosophy); Statutory law; Statute; Normative; Judicial review; Doctrine","score_opus":0.02708630920573562,"score_gpt":0.30014090627914086,"score_spread":0.27305459707340524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134582103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25141096,0.0045304666,0.0008360306,0.06520776,0.0015550539,0.002154341,0.0003524938,0.00073246274,0.6732204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723644,0.0005047765,0.00075028284,0.011960224,0.0035026057,0.00009481463,0.00002132296,0.000059375176,0.010742194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958433,0.00028819105,0.0007603764,0.0010609457,0.0009697618,0.0010774082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689233,0.0001483877,0.0003091138,0.00072566915,0.00019944074,0.0017250369],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005772563,0.00044756272,0.000537031,0.000033070195,0.0019073839,0.0009921495,0.0014469854,0.00039652348,0.01256138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003246349,0.00047322776,0.00040186476,0.0011409275,0.0005408372,0.0007892747,0.00046069728,0.000980329,0.015962504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051900664,0.00029067215,0.00074372545,0.00009666536,0.0001242976,0.000024339843,0.023748096,0.000116132745,0.0012725097,0.91569275,0.049926646,0.007912296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060562324,0.00011565095,0.0012120857,0.000044059132,0.0000925586,0.0000012200514,0.0069712326,0.00037539235,0.00047185924,0.0042374628,0.98526067,0.0006122153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005590363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072410563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93533397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021936162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005405889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135437313","doi":"","title":"Trusteeship in the context of inheritance law","year":2022,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Trust law; Civil code; Settlor; Conflict of laws; Private law","score_opus":0.015056511246893682,"score_gpt":0.2885719136744647,"score_spread":0.27351540242757105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135437313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24331646,0.0046200533,0.0000018796031,0.0002955317,0.0017061847,0.0011520179,0.00063773076,0.00003282944,0.7482373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974948,0.000054724213,0.000032512773,0.00019493964,0.0005537614,0.00023647539,0.0009138218,0.000043503802,0.023022262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343985,0.0005727867,0.0018378933,0.00077691925,0.002964741,0.00040781664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946885,0.0010582769,0.0017999571,0.00062548305,0.0016985674,0.00012918383],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007844983,0.00048804175,0.00069947983,0.00024766402,0.0011659621,0.0009154055,0.0015098972,0.00048699512,0.00003999496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038925867,0.00043963053,0.0005822142,0.0013435518,0.0007865445,0.0013385944,0.00010531637,0.0010374904,0.000004495571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034182522,0.0011012782,0.0050717867,0.000498341,0.0001616225,0.00006678718,0.07178627,0.00007153478,0.0026542603,0.9169302,0.0007753141,0.0005408005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002158157,0.0009697751,0.048716642,0.0029220302,0.00032061132,0.00026769275,0.12285706,0.00015292727,0.011844011,0.025014283,0.78248036,0.0022964492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010515698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004420695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8919159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004546738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011345134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135496905","doi":"","title":"Trust as a tool for intergenerational asset transfer","year":2024,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Asset (computer security); Fiduciary; Legislator; Civil code; Statute; Subject (documents); Notional amount","score_opus":0.01226943070035474,"score_gpt":0.2976332550615098,"score_spread":0.28536382436115504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135496905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5191345,0.0053150966,0.0006519817,0.0010379812,0.012414467,0.0037753868,0.005394549,0.0003159658,0.4519601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77174586,0.000058193753,0.00019054856,0.00011198014,0.0034239981,0.00059022545,0.005992768,0.00010964543,0.21777678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326104,0.00015415726,0.0020384048,0.0014332208,0.0025228846,0.0005902736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937084,0.0006545347,0.000578661,0.00048600513,0.0042463606,0.00032608683],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004814977,0.00082509295,0.0007895197,0.000465129,0.0014359095,0.003962305,0.00087505067,0.0010794346,0.000041013718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005882998,0.00083458144,0.0013560806,0.00087580684,0.00042378632,0.0020228815,0.00007171196,0.00080348965,0.00007362355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012982391,0.0016580389,0.0014809276,0.0028966437,0.0019217471,0.00012520871,0.03474232,0.00033764413,0.04539797,0.8813072,0.026784252,0.0020498268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014672267,0.00089349877,0.0035525209,0.0037172334,0.000888477,0.00029250715,0.0032621624,0.0019696783,0.04037946,0.024341693,0.91655934,0.0026761724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095761716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042940155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8897751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063475943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030084671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135497850","doi":"","title":"Trust in the context of inheritance law","year":2023,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Trust law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Civil code; Settlor; Private law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.01683646614468567,"score_gpt":0.2909882681745832,"score_spread":0.27415180202989753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135497850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48780152,0.0025492485,0.000003173519,0.00034659568,0.0022028303,0.0011911276,0.0005725874,0.00006522309,0.5052677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642582,0.00008000975,0.000026889451,0.000121854835,0.0007387772,0.00015120099,0.00075583585,0.000052908235,0.033814315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942068,0.0003282974,0.0018201849,0.0007527747,0.0024723052,0.00041967788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442744,0.0010494436,0.0015559222,0.0005861952,0.0022477333,0.00013325318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006623732,0.00048484365,0.0006946674,0.00026396778,0.0007872946,0.0010274058,0.0012752451,0.00064983766,0.0000040946466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049991626,0.00042004065,0.000549077,0.0015475017,0.00086943107,0.0012503669,0.0000746779,0.00077348406,0.000017577206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040046102,0.0013031799,0.011709206,0.0010541718,0.0003169821,0.00015537004,0.11621786,0.00008115436,0.0075121424,0.8576988,0.0023696297,0.0011810528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038985093,0.0012993828,0.28630996,0.012867475,0.00060366694,0.0003010607,0.18577918,0.000580366,0.038236953,0.039555635,0.42612344,0.00444436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001202632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006719901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8181431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028970442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093431363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135523655","doi":"","title":"Foundations of charity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Voluntary sector; Key (lock); Public sector; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.10390108542466969,"score_gpt":0.3762906497931371,"score_spread":0.2723895643684674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135523655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050733467,0.000120122735,0.000085966385,0.0006175273,0.000038027185,0.00043687152,0.0005112011,0.0000205024,0.9930964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16611962,0.0016864443,0.000066021654,0.000005538388,0.00010089801,6.6937e-7,0.00024395688,0.00001095964,0.8317659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978302,0.00016299821,0.00018097053,0.00031013932,0.0011696414,0.00034602132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863493,0.00022352055,0.00019694124,0.00041634802,0.0003706986,0.00015753256],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009091595,0.000110433095,0.00029762505,0.00026876677,0.0008176136,0.00004773909,0.00085403374,0.00026271478,0.0050443285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005843407,0.0001408221,0.00025099376,0.00032358617,0.0021504695,0.00062383304,0.00022212633,0.0005287063,0.00013671115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030713945,0.00016800291,0.00013369646,0.00007648746,0.0000863645,0.000017634491,0.004319127,0.000003478499,0.00002315117,0.94424284,0.048641503,0.0022570088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019796174,0.00006778599,0.001792149,0.00012774901,0.000044723223,5.330613e-7,0.010194625,0.00000783336,0.0000057272146,0.055239793,0.9321222,0.00019893181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014476145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013991193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88900304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012905407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003201145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99586517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135540265","doi":"","title":"The Specifics of Use of Trusts in Business Relations","year":2020,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Corporate governance; Position (finance); Express trust; Business relations; Czech","score_opus":0.021925409365078575,"score_gpt":0.27248608815249364,"score_spread":0.25056067878741506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135540265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7017792,0.0043990035,0.00008629227,0.0012408688,0.0037893597,0.0021624023,0.0012097307,0.000067864545,0.2852653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709813,0.00024732287,0.00017288698,0.000013264096,0.00049538095,0.000047773512,0.0007374263,0.000045116416,0.027259544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942629,0.0002523221,0.00240056,0.0006535882,0.0021022437,0.00032840858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989921,0.0016516307,0.0025947772,0.0005301527,0.00512745,0.00017502856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033117266,0.0004356712,0.00071250304,0.00030562343,0.0007598173,0.00085205765,0.0008180808,0.0006008393,0.0000044266303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018745625,0.00038744372,0.00047556334,0.0022388734,0.0008360177,0.0016885704,0.00010349069,0.00063835515,0.0000049098853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016011408,0.0023518985,0.087490305,0.0017775139,0.0008493345,0.00009675645,0.051256984,0.0027041186,0.029284216,0.81684643,0.0034687866,0.0022725055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012015068,0.00031514,0.6319737,0.0043796017,0.00032251602,0.000050427796,0.006094559,0.0011732238,0.018121947,0.005789184,0.32915702,0.0014211725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030145186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000113012604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81105727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029786542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018650428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135563487","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary","year":2016,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.010581450857008269,"score_gpt":0.28072293313189517,"score_spread":0.2701414822748869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135563487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106446035,0.003424231,0.000039815728,0.00041776596,0.004940691,0.00096769584,0.0010023086,0.00016559582,0.88259584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73252934,0.00013030207,0.00007119844,0.00006814071,0.0029706485,0.000104596395,0.0009811951,0.00007989185,0.26306465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925419,0.0002689412,0.0019391456,0.0013555343,0.0031922322,0.00070223125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913549,0.00076916476,0.0019757296,0.0007758013,0.0046321624,0.00049223413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004290363,0.0008203998,0.0008496319,0.00043948097,0.0019626545,0.0020405925,0.0012599567,0.0011832201,0.00004149116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000716704,0.00073869893,0.00095428457,0.0009017918,0.00074973336,0.0027028676,0.0001459174,0.00076359167,0.00012592449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021014053,0.0054666367,0.03727121,0.0037118252,0.0034686632,0.00078565604,0.07211394,0.00008878392,0.14588091,0.6622406,0.043610115,0.023260225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001881434,0.000586915,0.048234977,0.008268296,0.00052576844,0.0003425741,0.0036327655,0.0000868757,0.057560273,0.020657502,0.854351,0.003871659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015353537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001970715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8107408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006760152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023974425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135564440","doi":"","title":"The concept of trust in Czech law","year":2006,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Settlor; Trust law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil code; Construct (python library); Legislature; Principal (computer security); Public law; Salient","score_opus":0.008045058971648375,"score_gpt":0.2717096777789822,"score_spread":0.26366461880733383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135564440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2514643,0.005434856,0.000009232353,0.00021555966,0.0022332307,0.001054646,0.00051701936,0.000047459573,0.7390237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91802967,0.000045087836,0.000043542466,0.000028882541,0.00084032776,0.00008874673,0.0008851051,0.000045809054,0.07999282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939303,0.00027216162,0.0021792483,0.00077233586,0.002346196,0.00049975864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353826,0.0008942134,0.001975865,0.000575845,0.0028470764,0.00016872767],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048195088,0.0005281806,0.0006927576,0.00021795227,0.0013715526,0.001349948,0.0010969642,0.00076122803,0.0000033843999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003538543,0.00045527163,0.0005917649,0.0010319285,0.001210713,0.0012417857,0.000091880196,0.00076491956,0.0000054608918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003626664,0.001073471,0.0070963865,0.00035407086,0.0002631911,0.000060326798,0.01658449,0.00040550646,0.0068558767,0.96325815,0.002475622,0.0012102479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003208032,0.0008319023,0.10489013,0.0059960554,0.00043315373,0.00016506085,0.021006895,0.00066585885,0.1338527,0.037053116,0.68840504,0.0034920594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016704603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005554381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92620504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044204723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012762132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135580114","doi":"","title":"Trust in Czech Law","year":2012,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Settlor; Trust law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil code; Construct (python library); Legislature; Principal (computer security); Public law","score_opus":0.013000078444193276,"score_gpt":0.28591332764989863,"score_spread":0.27291324920570537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135580114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26083058,0.0035458615,0.000006836949,0.00014031639,0.0029823142,0.00087333895,0.00034107055,0.00008305641,0.73119664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9067221,0.000051575767,0.00008494206,0.0000741028,0.0020371655,0.00014418847,0.0013753234,0.000079011814,0.089431554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993242,0.00027117672,0.0020067794,0.0010605933,0.002627017,0.0007923811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946688,0.00042013702,0.0014909012,0.00062504684,0.0023351524,0.0004599995],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055234414,0.00074773526,0.00085474266,0.0004517945,0.0011471662,0.0017595761,0.0010177862,0.0012272004,0.00002233101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003251995,0.00079260755,0.0006550042,0.0012544012,0.0005757987,0.0031906597,0.00012192364,0.0011172085,0.0000583028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059676595,0.0032789602,0.05557054,0.0012849261,0.0004951108,0.00018750553,0.044167865,0.00014239387,0.018749872,0.8718137,0.001893182,0.0018191809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002674693,0.0005161919,0.27669722,0.0061270217,0.00049977895,0.00035605085,0.011896547,0.00032416292,0.03158546,0.015907513,0.64872026,0.0046951217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010348696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030632265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8559062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082331634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012441133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135601079","doi":"","title":"Trust as a legal implant","year":2022,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Subject (documents); Czech; Express trust; Institution; Trust law; Common law","score_opus":0.008915523639897133,"score_gpt":0.28695681895675035,"score_spread":0.27804129531685323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135601079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26320532,0.0024755036,0.000007166844,0.00028531608,0.0052749394,0.0010804671,0.0013370237,0.00015310578,0.72618115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72590494,0.00007586467,0.000042395455,0.0001245086,0.0016181986,0.00023381197,0.0033699695,0.00008565107,0.26854464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911833,0.00034579524,0.0020197905,0.0014580953,0.0042440007,0.00074905396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934553,0.0005495227,0.0020493458,0.0007500967,0.0026670042,0.00052876613],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048699937,0.00086604274,0.00091653905,0.00051952514,0.0032123856,0.003279634,0.0014783108,0.00080647797,0.00015941767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057525665,0.00092973316,0.0010542822,0.0013427029,0.00054847373,0.00251864,0.00025605617,0.0014194972,0.00006373387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021161127,0.0041013793,0.0074807215,0.0015737006,0.0019781864,0.0019905628,0.059083868,0.00036337675,0.028651124,0.8586856,0.030135924,0.0038394437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007823019,0.0005743206,0.0069843135,0.0007324739,0.00026847143,0.0011220876,0.007407956,0.000110302964,0.0071510067,0.0031526391,0.9701761,0.0015380544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011386479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005296381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010596251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037874368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135617662","doi":"","title":"Trust","year":2015,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Civil law (Civil law); Natural person; Legal research","score_opus":0.01633639927026074,"score_gpt":0.30156296348355976,"score_spread":0.285226564213299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135617662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1841521,0.0037682,0.000011516275,0.00018568421,0.0041646017,0.0009019006,0.00070110644,0.00014740053,0.8059675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7677984,0.000062374755,0.00010237415,0.000054671298,0.0025201344,0.00009803198,0.0020912623,0.000082525126,0.2271902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918366,0.00025966796,0.0019405851,0.0012565668,0.0040502273,0.00065632135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98857725,0.00038960113,0.0019450529,0.00073482125,0.0076701087,0.0006831505],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005735774,0.00082162133,0.0009112264,0.00043475296,0.0014644183,0.0027870345,0.0012594635,0.0012114383,0.000021464175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009085557,0.0008469197,0.00080612325,0.0012488267,0.00070996606,0.0025365667,0.00014166246,0.0009755243,0.000093265306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029313983,0.008219846,0.04361348,0.004251012,0.0037573562,0.00096146594,0.16942555,0.0008522373,0.03927168,0.58741987,0.12409714,0.0151989665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001542579,0.0005755105,0.019676348,0.002772595,0.00047567472,0.00029190295,0.008853591,0.00040832863,0.009681407,0.01800224,0.93497205,0.002747772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027081626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003540987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81087494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009038625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003700506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135633293","doi":"","title":"Procedural Aspects of a Trust Fund","year":2025,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Express trust; Construct (python library); Procedural justice; Position (finance); Procedural law; Subject (documents); Blind trust; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.01598128931746604,"score_gpt":0.29303982776235904,"score_spread":0.277058538444893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135633293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21148868,0.0024694144,0.000014575466,0.00017838257,0.0021796988,0.0010066541,0.00063733716,0.000076969256,0.78194827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84231514,0.000055448814,0.00008099463,0.000046913417,0.00092924864,0.00009979027,0.0010935894,0.000043499735,0.1553354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99347764,0.00017718408,0.002102598,0.0010827497,0.0026357784,0.0005240321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99082893,0.000543565,0.0022527063,0.0006076168,0.005468387,0.0002987927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031563392,0.00069872185,0.00097649975,0.0005516142,0.0010572572,0.0012207343,0.0010830805,0.0009413947,0.000014391458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007947222,0.0007206377,0.0008703955,0.0015778894,0.00058205216,0.001653525,0.0001319837,0.00075715216,0.000009764368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011916151,0.0032530115,0.010121986,0.006467322,0.0017188729,0.00014114197,0.038916595,0.00024662167,0.03675545,0.89234084,0.0059566377,0.0028899205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004759332,0.0019498769,0.11762265,0.02509956,0.0020890224,0.0004492319,0.023552673,0.0012384477,0.23443861,0.04713502,0.53515226,0.0065133064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023937364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059681046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050153217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004381856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135657142","doi":"","title":"The Trust Funds","year":2014,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Civil code; Negotiation; Subject (documents); Convention; Legal profession; Civil law (Civil law); Legal research; Legal person","score_opus":0.009774942542821494,"score_gpt":0.2748570547296508,"score_spread":0.26508211218682926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135657142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11177522,0.0044684676,0.00004068989,0.0005584667,0.006037247,0.0010315938,0.0003104416,0.00013981646,0.87563807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7397697,0.00013734636,0.000035150344,0.00006590915,0.0026571085,0.00012331289,0.0007707885,0.00006620057,0.25637448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272007,0.0003583136,0.0019070836,0.0010762961,0.003231497,0.0007067303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99093276,0.0013685593,0.002057795,0.0008926116,0.0043318467,0.00041640268],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007587713,0.00073738,0.00069498934,0.00023116136,0.0045568338,0.0049314955,0.0016420218,0.00094154035,0.000009530128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001011989,0.0006016223,0.00090170425,0.00096506585,0.0010652734,0.0014627893,0.00014028678,0.0010143155,0.000061613406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010011926,0.0014426074,0.014245952,0.0011155729,0.0014732255,0.00009619141,0.03192399,0.0002314249,0.008415719,0.9025458,0.025717074,0.01179123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049127097,0.00023096778,0.021574296,0.00094342727,0.00018739332,0.000078911944,0.0020878322,0.0003137521,0.0038163115,0.005622809,0.9636036,0.0010494296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019922794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000080293605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93788654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005021673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016682827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135665742","doi":"","title":"Negligent Misstatement in Canada: Young v Bella","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (King's College London)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04459314029682378,"score_gpt":0.35868689653215113,"score_spread":0.31409375623532737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135665742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5645403,0.00041909693,0.000014928561,0.0071295174,0.00018544473,0.00123459,0.00012214846,0.000039732895,0.42631423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833321,0.00016109897,0.00008855704,0.0000769315,0.00028890994,0.00017378338,0.000028053717,0.000017970704,0.015832573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960366,0.00028091358,0.00044769445,0.00040325668,0.0017365065,0.0010950487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998867,0.00020092736,0.00007879039,0.00031930534,0.0002542335,0.00027978796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018053949,0.00013162546,0.00019536835,0.00017690028,0.0009989643,0.00011428177,0.00052753993,0.00007137602,0.0006607368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121758356,0.0001352808,0.00005598343,0.0013023608,0.00021066722,0.00016451026,0.00016953563,0.0004134355,0.00006225918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036449263,0.00035730362,0.1262053,0.000042058717,0.000027171629,0.0009565017,0.0014370746,0.00036373845,0.0005083563,0.76019156,0.10817177,0.0017027508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054252776,0.00003256701,0.051859666,0.000048171194,0.0000049478426,0.000004182673,0.009012595,0.00030315912,0.00048465712,0.0041550626,0.9332509,0.0003015514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99409384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99910694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82507914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014782764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059245704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135684803","doi":"","title":"The role of trust in designing the supply chain contracts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Supply chain risk management; Supply chain management; Chain (unit); Outsourcing; Payment","score_opus":0.03139395950967959,"score_gpt":0.3031886819832714,"score_spread":0.2717947224735918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135684803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5780063,0.000121309444,0.00013239353,0.15952928,0.000035658675,0.0015489894,0.000059293747,0.000070715665,0.26049602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974451,0.00030638996,0.000043271553,0.000049403458,0.00007633657,0.000002691936,0.000003026675,0.000005438909,0.0020683182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980788,0.00053405866,0.00012865965,0.00018094825,0.0006304911,0.00044704063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987018,0.000686064,0.00006481488,0.00018033662,0.00017868636,0.00018827883],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016619957,0.00006262039,0.000103743674,0.000057479003,0.0013901852,0.00006689679,0.00077333034,0.00006343601,0.00010414616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041851314,0.000046511734,0.000059985596,0.0008728979,0.00072088983,0.0001802888,0.000206179,0.000466453,0.000024745825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083103136,0.00007009606,0.016830232,0.0000060654343,0.000025103025,0.00005008514,0.016192941,0.00006236972,0.0007693889,0.9599685,0.0021728238,0.0037692597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037167748,0.00007073838,0.017191475,0.00001782769,0.000007831043,2.458177e-7,0.1634733,0.00025926653,0.00090739084,0.0021368691,0.81545246,0.000110909255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01635156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019736951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082357416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048452787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135702105","doi":"","title":"Legal Status of the Settlor of a Trust","year":2024,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlor; Trust law; Express trust; Property (philosophy); Legal status; Testamentary trust; Blind trust; Czech","score_opus":0.009299594627023075,"score_gpt":0.27740495567232093,"score_spread":0.26810536104529786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135702105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53504664,0.004493679,0.000004807521,0.00012877662,0.0037752355,0.0008727571,0.0016943328,0.000044065764,0.45393974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903077,0.00007853381,0.000057379093,0.000021524576,0.00079623976,0.000057073725,0.00050508045,0.000058415175,0.095348775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933875,0.00021499349,0.002094853,0.0008103699,0.0029725393,0.0005197123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99277025,0.0004530181,0.0022335637,0.0007018036,0.0035802978,0.00026104064],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031701286,0.00055418257,0.00079489045,0.00031696813,0.0006604715,0.0008927523,0.0010869124,0.0006909117,0.00001145852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064462755,0.0004481853,0.0011490666,0.0014877451,0.0010269948,0.0011892105,0.00018932547,0.0008233968,0.000008070854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008142244,0.0021700575,0.019445239,0.005990811,0.0019041307,0.00007866987,0.08295381,0.00041476073,0.09497915,0.78284603,0.006497312,0.0019058103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001296628,0.00068723154,0.07717087,0.010374241,0.0012908465,0.00019521079,0.014946949,0.000651109,0.16495137,0.009493604,0.71688294,0.0020589908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008857403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006472472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7733524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042924684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034261383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135762557","doi":"","title":"Trust in Czech Law","year":2012,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Settlor; Trust law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil code; Construct (python library); Legislature; Principal (computer security); Public law","score_opus":0.013000078444193276,"score_gpt":0.28591332764989863,"score_spread":0.27291324920570537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135762557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26083058,0.0035458615,0.000006836949,0.00014031639,0.0029823142,0.00087333895,0.00034107055,0.00008305641,0.73119664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9067221,0.000051575767,0.00008494206,0.0000741028,0.0020371655,0.00014418847,0.0013753234,0.000079011814,0.089431554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993242,0.00027117672,0.0020067794,0.0010605933,0.002627017,0.0007923811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946688,0.00042013702,0.0014909012,0.00062504684,0.0023351524,0.0004599995],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055234414,0.00074773526,0.00085474266,0.0004517945,0.0011471662,0.0017595761,0.0010177862,0.0012272004,0.00002233101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003251995,0.00079260755,0.0006550042,0.0012544012,0.0005757987,0.0031906597,0.00012192364,0.0011172085,0.0000583028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059676595,0.0032789602,0.05557054,0.0012849261,0.0004951108,0.00018750553,0.044167865,0.00014239387,0.018749872,0.8718137,0.001893182,0.0018191809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002674693,0.0005161919,0.27669722,0.0061270217,0.00049977895,0.00035605085,0.011896547,0.00032416292,0.03158546,0.015907513,0.64872026,0.0046951217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010348696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030632265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8559062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082331634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012441133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135768391","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the fraud exception: a critique of United City Merchants v Royal Bank of Canada forty years on","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Explore Bristol Research","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Payment; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.1605157355948501,"score_gpt":0.423482860637135,"score_spread":0.26296712504228487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135768391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95694166,0.00005313273,0.000033195498,0.007283963,0.000048848942,0.0004357375,0.000035500758,0.000009674566,0.035158258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602777,0.000043666252,0.000030035648,0.00009748533,0.0001878221,0.00003528708,0.0000068902154,0.000008061532,0.0035629713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977981,0.00043099144,0.00020777849,0.0001725026,0.001066165,0.0003244884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984648,0.0005776076,0.000076272045,0.00032750287,0.00045943976,0.00009435706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023748595,0.000054528162,0.00013157715,0.000079271565,0.0003532191,0.00002584493,0.0004668732,0.000054619944,0.00047567673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067150185,0.0000447618,0.000045816578,0.00069264986,0.0002791632,0.00005581014,0.00010888325,0.00035261668,0.000018738325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003308035,0.0003619909,0.044253413,0.00043680824,0.00013056063,0.000033847493,0.07097331,0.00048470806,0.003928949,0.6335852,0.18170477,0.063775636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041787548,0.0001354913,0.08358725,0.00030880643,0.000008112909,6.1467546e-7,0.037633505,0.0004894694,0.0016419523,0.0047967862,0.8707445,0.00023561803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6264651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16693872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68903977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018317712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009416184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8482625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135839263","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary","year":2016,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.010581450857008269,"score_gpt":0.28072293313189517,"score_spread":0.2701414822748869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135839263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106446035,0.003424231,0.000039815728,0.00041776596,0.004940691,0.00096769584,0.0010023086,0.00016559582,0.88259584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73252934,0.00013030207,0.00007119844,0.00006814071,0.0029706485,0.000104596395,0.0009811951,0.00007989185,0.26306465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925419,0.0002689412,0.0019391456,0.0013555343,0.0031922322,0.00070223125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913549,0.00076916476,0.0019757296,0.0007758013,0.0046321624,0.00049223413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004290363,0.0008203998,0.0008496319,0.00043948097,0.0019626545,0.0020405925,0.0012599567,0.0011832201,0.00004149116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000716704,0.00073869893,0.00095428457,0.0009017918,0.00074973336,0.0027028676,0.0001459174,0.00076359167,0.00012592449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021014053,0.0054666367,0.03727121,0.0037118252,0.0034686632,0.00078565604,0.07211394,0.00008878392,0.14588091,0.6622406,0.043610115,0.023260225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001881434,0.000586915,0.048234977,0.008268296,0.00052576844,0.0003425741,0.0036327655,0.0000868757,0.057560273,0.020657502,0.854351,0.003871659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015353537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001970715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8107408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006760152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023974425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135866723","doi":"","title":"Testamentary trust fund","year":2025,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Trust law; Express trust; Settlor; Czech; Blind trust; Property (philosophy)","score_opus":0.017867166140279223,"score_gpt":0.2966443882088608,"score_spread":0.2787772220685816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135866723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1523148,0.0039023068,0.00002236871,0.00030395083,0.0042777,0.0011471496,0.001180683,0.00014653125,0.8367045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6989621,0.0001144081,0.00011719004,0.00011639251,0.0014388567,0.00012269012,0.002602408,0.000050820836,0.29647517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992923,0.00023854659,0.0020003566,0.0013607983,0.0028232066,0.00065405905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925803,0.0007672928,0.0016326475,0.0007472311,0.0038596427,0.00041288778],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003646665,0.0008438033,0.00088706653,0.0005650936,0.0019874005,0.002749217,0.0012455974,0.0010506132,0.000032840988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052192545,0.000896712,0.0008973659,0.0014788645,0.0005512364,0.0021679548,0.00017662912,0.0010093598,0.000033523436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002799023,0.010237501,0.08754441,0.008763747,0.005684675,0.00091510185,0.07969165,0.00078224967,0.047764134,0.6603287,0.07032046,0.02516838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00162057,0.0005297685,0.04687882,0.0065242364,0.00079433137,0.00015719577,0.008427765,0.0004375151,0.020288358,0.007720385,0.9037208,0.0029002896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004249523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000597095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8334003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008852768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003097615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135894989","doi":"","title":"Use of the Fiduciary Fund in Commercial Relations","year":2024,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Czech; Doctrine; Work (physics); Subject matter; Commercial law; Capital (architecture)","score_opus":0.032097655301282946,"score_gpt":0.30156032203556954,"score_spread":0.2694626667342866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135894989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74911404,0.002832183,0.0000061120704,0.0007376724,0.005102503,0.001290434,0.0010049586,0.000060149385,0.23985197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89114034,0.000043127602,0.00005347934,0.000048242608,0.00078025105,0.00007386948,0.00060066115,0.000054115124,0.107205935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943946,0.0003377471,0.0019327448,0.0008105584,0.0021367574,0.00038758636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948493,0.0009801436,0.001342275,0.0006481821,0.0020173225,0.00016274278],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036379608,0.0005052079,0.00062257267,0.0004409467,0.0009028818,0.0013978115,0.00088406896,0.00082827726,0.000011009583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074739923,0.00043904968,0.0007965058,0.0019050607,0.00070000417,0.0019516803,0.00019121387,0.0011903368,0.000018473387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008323569,0.0040221196,0.20308682,0.0029898079,0.0014287933,0.00019325642,0.13564004,0.0030044215,0.020770267,0.5989728,0.025557635,0.003501678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007306159,0.00021320391,0.6683216,0.009167543,0.00055509806,0.0001050243,0.003905759,0.00092464156,0.009025056,0.010898689,0.29447126,0.0016814695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007939815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047836924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58807415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005665843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002083831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135904557","doi":"","title":"Relationship between trust and inheritance law","year":2025,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testamentary trust; Trust law; Beneficiary; Settlor; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Express trust; Probate","score_opus":0.022372027254942528,"score_gpt":0.2978588077478868,"score_spread":0.2754867804929443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135904557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3293445,0.0045742826,0.00003002977,0.00029847407,0.0014232913,0.00085165986,0.00076957914,0.000109139924,0.662599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8685292,0.000039625735,0.00015233814,0.000065078995,0.0011783208,0.00008930279,0.0014071846,0.00004351056,0.12849544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471885,0.00025346948,0.0016434048,0.0011222081,0.0018012207,0.00046083276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937491,0.0015959739,0.0012946513,0.00053008937,0.0024865048,0.00034367834],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003898123,0.0006389823,0.00076378137,0.00032479674,0.0022752234,0.002324967,0.0006985335,0.0010766402,0.0000039779693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008786042,0.00069786,0.00042677726,0.0010677599,0.0007485621,0.0021538846,0.00012832806,0.0009790934,0.000010181519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014157091,0.00029470827,0.21286996,0.0010807898,0.0002591945,0.000029880275,0.008679782,0.000020195235,0.0005967419,0.7744608,0.00090328045,0.000663108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011913814,0.00028351194,0.70630527,0.0043444326,0.0006177622,0.0000685964,0.0032890043,0.00009657341,0.003934554,0.044543467,0.2332089,0.0021165356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032356125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000870078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72991735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004186534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012828049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135930419","doi":"","title":"Fiduciary in comparative context","year":2021,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Trust law; Jurisdiction; Legislator; Common law; Flexibility (engineering); Voting trust; Settlor","score_opus":0.022011029618724528,"score_gpt":0.31177498765302947,"score_spread":0.28976395803430494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135930419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43577918,0.007803182,0.000008389999,0.00018478923,0.0025757812,0.0009072692,0.00045307892,0.00005930921,0.55222905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8963318,0.00010097634,0.000066867375,0.00009008166,0.00110291,0.0001349375,0.002426385,0.000048808553,0.09969726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932314,0.0004425968,0.0020578615,0.0012954422,0.0023934313,0.00057927665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992565,0.0008317156,0.001534796,0.00056529115,0.004173932,0.00032929768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039322392,0.000723287,0.0011356778,0.0004619641,0.0009661434,0.0019732905,0.0008549261,0.00094911054,0.000027287606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047249682,0.000791707,0.00069594523,0.0015174544,0.00058627716,0.0020564492,0.00012889678,0.0011362312,0.000030592826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001874379,0.009337582,0.07241544,0.003059081,0.0023407678,0.0018463638,0.39951232,0.000948761,0.038644906,0.4473493,0.016514769,0.006156312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004598498,0.00086065574,0.257204,0.01755758,0.0005741593,0.00053444813,0.120187074,0.0011190963,0.075685434,0.010058516,0.505241,0.006379584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006356791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053232315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4887262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077109964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028424866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139498018","doi":"","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Liability; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Asset (computer security); Duty; Investment (military); Duty of care","score_opus":0.027577810855619375,"score_gpt":0.320333969471667,"score_spread":0.2927561586160476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139498018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017946562,0.00041355504,0.0016082838,0.08028376,0.0021173353,0.00019007748,0.0000023122902,0.000064827305,0.89737326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90437895,0.00017138568,0.00039271772,0.00023311171,0.016771367,0.000009049804,0.0000014349299,0.0000043398054,0.07803766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916416,0.00005373764,0.00012716981,0.00011770747,0.00017245262,0.00036475633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953145,0.000021061003,0.00004251381,0.00016381363,0.000038568396,0.00020259005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005124817,0.00005964941,0.000060232556,0.00001714876,0.0005338062,0.000060881976,0.00011590393,0.00006578064,0.0201594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003941347,0.000054762713,0.00004679209,0.0003010842,0.00013920695,0.0005065655,0.00004169019,0.00008813054,0.0061585903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.203204e-7,0.00009706061,0.0008780541,0.0000017305982,0.000004936346,7.103485e-9,0.0040295506,7.964513e-7,0.00010709599,0.91409993,0.07165086,0.009129263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030243858,0.0000050616363,0.0026657577,6.0770066e-7,0.000012818844,3.4053653e-7,0.0029907136,0.000016116546,0.0002355056,0.000650163,0.9933112,0.000081446684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007111995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006786016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92166036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006457443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040829444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99461526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139623890","doi":"","title":"Chevron Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Deference; Agency (philosophy); Statute; Statutory law; Normative; Doctrine","score_opus":0.028384357854748715,"score_gpt":0.30291955057845726,"score_spread":0.2745351927237085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139623890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07030866,0.0022804532,0.0004336564,0.08874477,0.000817414,0.0011313147,0.000144555,0.00038270454,0.8357565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97508407,0.00050201785,0.0005028251,0.0114694815,0.0031111126,0.000060020328,0.000013757455,0.000040272964,0.0092164595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691474,0.00020120997,0.0005574321,0.0007994395,0.00071884075,0.00080830837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765104,0.00009859164,0.00022277686,0.000514726,0.0001347202,0.0013781246],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043013375,0.00031941538,0.00038645143,0.000020623062,0.0014851649,0.00055881514,0.0010628309,0.00029409456,0.010751085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022728516,0.0003388082,0.0002812165,0.00085066265,0.0005884392,0.0006149434,0.0003193751,0.00073327764,0.0132959075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028593835,0.0001490229,0.0006126216,0.000056388744,0.000055628272,0.000010027076,0.006922593,0.000055550787,0.0016376448,0.95563245,0.031773787,0.0030656988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043082412,0.000088786175,0.00092630816,0.000030275345,0.000056714114,6.242131e-7,0.0016867002,0.0003187446,0.0005859293,0.0030816954,0.99235874,0.00043467397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008810156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027567262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96058494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016419185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041028383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7145359356","doi":"","title":"Interests of Corporation and Remedies of Stakeholders in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.04945477166895739,"score_gpt":0.2725458619694975,"score_spread":0.22309109030054008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7145359356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924289,0.00033586886,0.0005038091,0.00041603405,0.0010699157,0.0002495935,0.0007455995,0.000006547133,0.00424375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987713,0.00014692474,0.000617526,0.000026601054,0.00024128327,0.00000892559,0.000110744804,0.0000051890024,0.000071497794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982556,0.00011300089,0.00060787087,0.0002650805,0.0005765249,0.00018189958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987206,0.00021414591,0.00041343117,0.0002747848,0.00026819765,0.000108856984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004176155,0.00013072955,0.00026144902,0.00006983522,0.00026387395,0.000033030607,0.00021381515,0.00006191035,0.000013729841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005287635,0.00013324808,0.000030849722,0.00035288424,0.0008838172,0.0004919012,0.00013556011,0.00014040669,7.1687464e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011844029,0.00019443322,0.09668226,0.00046558442,0.000072890965,0.000018605644,0.004119306,0.0011183668,0.014348446,0.88051087,0.001216461,0.0011343543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045366087,0.0005344883,0.2767214,0.0053076255,0.00046738572,0.000079835,0.05558407,0.021430813,0.06883459,0.005344366,0.5588788,0.0022800493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96110135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96912754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8751665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004395903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032281585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57266146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155367086","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3936","title":"Is Illegality a Defence to Restitutionary Claims?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Plaintiff; Doctrine; Presumption; Unjust enrichment; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Damages","score_opus":0.036064644835670075,"score_gpt":0.37980429649223807,"score_spread":0.343739651656568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155367086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036185496,0.00012483199,0.004868774,0.057678584,0.00027516318,0.00014709902,0.000013133997,0.000042408818,0.9332315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98577857,0.00008035851,0.0025297205,0.0055979434,0.00029232955,0.000013695844,8.720602e-7,0.000003851644,0.0057026534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889034,0.00010439564,0.0002215587,0.00017854718,0.0003224162,0.00028275079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927366,0.000061679166,0.0000610432,0.00019392783,0.00017292805,0.0002367603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006771572,0.000076672746,0.00010248822,0.000044421526,0.0023512668,0.00022103648,0.00042194317,0.00010314859,0.0003529814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089916866,0.000071109964,0.00008978661,0.00034592624,0.00020532357,0.00024295521,0.00008432092,0.00038603094,0.00018674339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007453214,0.00003906793,0.00085212715,0.0000027773856,0.000010611238,0.0000051366324,0.0007522343,0.000035086436,0.00007135692,0.9839963,0.013114072,0.0011137888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010279867,0.000009701979,0.0029233433,0.000038093356,0.000011219069,0.0000068748336,0.00043286444,0.0000132753285,0.00008262842,0.26236314,0.7339319,0.00008419524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03637101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07752846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98216003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017593494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036467996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155400550","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3935","title":"Looking through Trusts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Property (philosophy); Welfare; Subject (documents); Distribution (mathematics); Real property","score_opus":0.03262382887769831,"score_gpt":0.3527279788952945,"score_spread":0.3201041500175962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155400550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010326799,0.0011020595,0.002609428,0.010276604,0.0005582873,0.00006371321,0.000003921845,0.00010333959,0.98424995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345094,0.00034892195,0.0012754679,0.00036987,0.0014722276,0.0000045666475,8.518264e-7,0.000012337484,0.0030647905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990744,0.00006286275,0.00016154889,0.00013079123,0.00030117974,0.0002692435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996377,0.00006511377,0.000037794045,0.00009398333,0.000045793116,0.00011960355],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047625173,0.0000677363,0.000077453384,0.000018815423,0.001318615,0.0006905895,0.00024088612,0.00006181592,0.0007485232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021612646,0.000057504676,0.000098023535,0.00016342457,0.00012939199,0.00048766957,0.00003216725,0.00033915899,0.0003180688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010045953,0.00001291382,0.000034306817,0.000004324285,0.00001443814,0.000027361051,0.0022910133,0.000010107085,0.000057141817,0.9906446,0.0019554116,0.004947383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046592642,0.0000066321068,0.000022002398,0.000038739912,0.000012177692,0.000030958206,0.00058676983,0.00004977062,0.00006495874,0.27952304,0.71955055,0.00006777627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016279884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054194946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010224118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012811393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162021074","doi":"10.82308/54357","title":"Liberté, responsabilité et utilité : la bonne foi comme instrument de justice contractuelle","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Economic Justice; Good faith; Normalization (sociology); Faith; Bad faith","score_opus":0.05838018296388806,"score_gpt":0.3588620645891531,"score_spread":0.300481881625265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162021074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44385648,0.0006987741,0.0005295104,0.019236507,0.0005253726,0.0008681413,0.00009724772,0.0001411026,0.5340469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8422985,0.002410216,0.0018916301,0.0020956725,0.00023939039,0.00019660905,0.00024449383,0.000044594854,0.15057892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636155,0.0010020949,0.0007072729,0.00062033266,0.0005862633,0.0007224557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959243,0.0025662147,0.00032223863,0.0005231712,0.00023829838,0.00042577714],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014628618,0.00041245125,0.0004714898,0.00007910978,0.0014328309,0.00017170125,0.0006620909,0.0006981886,0.0011204584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006656405,0.00041179892,0.00029223657,0.00051643746,0.0005734114,0.00030212192,0.00008466729,0.00081904116,0.00051640533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014869128,0.0006912141,0.0005880808,0.00014189756,0.00006602964,0.0000115706525,0.04100306,0.00005038435,0.00028229158,0.93380666,0.004255949,0.018954156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058038963,0.00008885153,0.014617884,0.00011299187,0.0002608164,0.000013574834,0.029025674,0.001072995,0.0004459987,0.006770968,0.94646794,0.00054193323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0226835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019164938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004250444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001306894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162214203","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvxkn57g.22","title":"UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE AS APPLIED TO THE BLOCK","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Semiotics","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03491203451588563,"score_gpt":0.3054422386308007,"score_spread":0.2705302041149151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162214203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029796507,0.000095341115,0.00028746127,0.09094061,0.0006488104,0.0024314143,0.00025525986,0.00013677443,0.90490633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71801287,0.00092402456,0.0007485287,0.023214288,0.0047383783,0.00008955288,0.000063539235,0.00015402233,0.25205478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606997,0.000065077686,0.0008309512,0.0010546768,0.0012116048,0.0007676991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968224,0.00040761914,0.00045411152,0.0012230843,0.00025002973,0.00084271916],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007157496,0.00063145696,0.00065133115,0.000058648384,0.0020472778,0.00036097682,0.0020840666,0.00058852055,0.0010725727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026729016,0.0005039589,0.00037145076,0.000374016,0.0006216345,0.000050094026,0.001055642,0.0012360488,0.01131678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021549833,0.00003191137,0.0000045169377,0.00002579508,0.00009692691,0.0000046344153,0.0047240793,0.004606945,0.0000400596,0.9801782,0.0082435645,0.0020218433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014113134,0.00007576618,0.000016710786,0.000050004117,0.00018925336,0.0000021123044,0.0009876451,0.00032938592,0.00004389696,0.027356608,0.97018504,0.0006224248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005528384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011703812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9619415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003480871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007865332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164413310","doi":"10.3735/9781935306436.book-part-018","title":"Positive Team","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Action (physics); Freedom of information; Legislation","score_opus":0.026137163622791934,"score_gpt":0.29402832560592246,"score_spread":0.2678911619831305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164413310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004317977,0.00011918166,0.0003036874,0.005090027,0.000444029,0.0010412344,0.00013432026,0.00006422268,0.9927601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15704776,0.0007372447,0.0001842003,0.000976214,0.0006544314,0.000008290426,0.000023436438,0.000033628072,0.8403348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979585,0.000028497116,0.00039731077,0.00063962874,0.0005578008,0.00041829154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985825,0.00019748496,0.00025941897,0.0004977874,0.00022039807,0.00024241647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028106925,0.00034263256,0.00038750682,0.000062866064,0.00078034657,0.0001851926,0.0006011735,0.0005408614,0.023896797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016912923,0.00031668585,0.0003420853,0.000064443346,0.00053577084,0.00017987195,0.00023807453,0.0004898856,0.028044822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037943328,0.00002477361,0.000014958188,0.000006479946,0.00005398515,7.7668227e-7,0.0011939756,0.000001784498,0.000015685124,0.9903411,0.0028033196,0.005539321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011017878,0.000056326917,0.00010833817,0.000059014124,0.000070061535,8.8576087e-7,0.00068612496,0.00003317311,0.000024265948,0.028152326,0.9702457,0.00045359356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022428688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007727842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017856374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005458563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164896162","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2009.12556393","title":"Exchange and Sacrifice.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.019622864472873817,"score_gpt":0.28539237517528887,"score_spread":0.26576951070241506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164896162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013447889,0.00031731953,0.00022169953,0.0051940386,0.00005526385,0.00011935404,0.000004710368,0.00008596035,0.9926569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934795,0.00029209882,0.00038337416,0.00003292447,0.00016560989,0.0000072019025,0.0000017507973,0.0000028356387,0.0056347363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994935,0.000026361922,0.000063996355,0.00013052138,0.000116967756,0.00016865584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997246,0.00002541244,0.000022124173,0.00010689195,0.00001977996,0.00010113695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019298492,0.000046351804,0.000056007928,0.000020644757,0.00035478166,0.000061660045,0.00008287336,0.000040366976,0.00017952039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023129738,0.00004384849,0.000020040497,0.0001283549,0.00010068286,0.00009187608,0.000010142877,0.00005257879,0.00010116453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003927043,0.000051374158,0.0002941585,0.0000045493284,0.000003936855,0.0000023133175,0.027935205,5.906875e-7,0.00030017475,0.85315865,0.010926425,0.10731869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008787869,0.000019002176,0.0014902535,0.000004161111,0.0000050514686,6.68855e-7,0.1009265,0.000018092098,0.000033887303,0.011484557,0.8858257,0.00010426917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012954787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012079894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002010933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023049566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27287295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165112071","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0024","title":"Theology in <i>Vincent v Lake Erie</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Relevance (law); Damages; Property (philosophy); Private property; Economic Justice; Natural law; Property rights; Obligation; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.00755479912293219,"score_gpt":0.25438042034466074,"score_spread":0.24682562122172855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165112071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017168637,0.00024215813,0.0007164883,0.004082479,0.00012411196,0.000060336974,0.000009410863,0.000008709391,0.97758764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954158,0.0005281268,0.00044788118,0.00014092855,0.00003332387,3.7681488e-8,6.4295756e-7,8.9586325e-7,0.0034323772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961644,0.00007066674,0.00006556115,0.000055978348,0.00007995096,0.00011141832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976456,0.00003162445,0.000049036524,0.00005924882,0.00005076199,0.00004477234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023907602,0.000027715845,0.000071096176,0.000010480776,0.00045045777,0.000011287595,0.00023875419,0.000041505147,0.0016622542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000101938385,0.00003075195,0.00004070096,0.00003663662,0.00021207426,0.00017527994,0.000047848633,0.00008117259,0.000003898116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013216859,0.000035994915,0.0019394029,0.0000013089928,0.0000071614177,0.0000046241685,0.0024410132,0.000011243041,0.000014301343,0.9920816,0.0012370008,0.0022131442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022643241,0.0000072256266,0.0052580377,0.000011480722,0.000006186821,5.7859023e-7,0.0058066854,0.0000075309727,0.000005223613,0.004727224,0.9839145,0.000028878865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08616842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94652396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98735434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002899452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001205492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W748150488","doi":"","title":"The Reason to Reverse: Unjust Factors and Juristic Reasons","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston University law review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Wonder; Odds; English law; Commonwealth; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03293329871804214,"score_gpt":0.30397240801429154,"score_spread":0.2710391092962494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W748150488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035455614,0.057092782,0.00014893395,0.08396297,0.00033922508,0.0021180178,0.000099180885,0.0001979691,0.8205853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8787456,0.104588844,0.00024716664,0.0018436346,0.00013284181,0.0000027407277,0.000007797381,0.000009518339,0.014421822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992952,0.00014228332,0.00006589569,0.000110452966,0.00013891608,0.00024728858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992918,0.00014711336,0.000047283673,0.000194436,0.00004435299,0.0002750271],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054341677,0.00006632988,0.000109527784,0.000009251741,0.0013846252,0.00002838993,0.0002098984,0.000033233275,0.000059745125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015188956,0.000049755752,0.000047504127,0.00023123046,0.0001804101,0.0001637299,0.00008737698,0.00007678287,0.000095837175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013318518,0.000010618688,0.0008736838,0.000037020534,0.000004596348,3.907094e-7,0.00047943188,2.2377138e-8,0.0000012808212,0.979856,0.016979232,0.0017563483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027651298,0.000004699806,0.002818029,0.00014595006,0.000052342184,4.114587e-7,0.0006621641,8.985039e-8,0.0000014144288,0.000055041477,0.9961611,0.000071079936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066677677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045920894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011315975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051881172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W75378226","doi":"","title":"Costs - solicitor's retainer on 'no win, no fee' basis - meaning of 'win' - solicitor not entitled to recover excess of costs over amount paid on settlement - no consideration for variation of oral retainer.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Meaning (existential); Retainer; Project commissioning; Law; Publishing; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Finance; Engineering; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022976804210440745,"score_gpt":0.26624837598308987,"score_spread":0.24327157177264913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W75378226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643016,0.0000044221624,0.001245461,0.004154864,0.00020965881,0.0010964297,0.00033333516,0.000066287546,0.028587934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99560946,0.00004710928,0.0027100996,0.00009227415,0.000061174534,0.00000478502,0.000018891618,0.000010405417,0.0014457746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870574,0.00007298168,0.00033513943,0.00030920142,0.0003423631,0.00023454658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828666,0.00014193033,0.00046304957,0.0003663731,0.0006773248,0.00006465455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044648754,0.00013754077,0.00035396294,0.00027770232,0.0002222862,0.000011331652,0.00031980852,0.00024551354,0.0006028327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046192677,0.00014654793,0.0001132525,0.00031228922,0.0002324287,0.00012834228,0.00011354221,0.00013386358,0.000052523625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025053213,0.002443925,0.041750807,0.0004263749,0.0008880997,0.000009876994,0.011235179,0.00085082324,0.134651,0.7230048,0.06254937,0.019684387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009656481,0.0033653865,0.078182206,0.0011209816,0.00056091347,0.0000012579234,0.004745737,0.00735925,0.10774758,0.003665572,0.78216255,0.001432068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037492476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012568561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7196132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002638451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006924046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6600595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77113317","doi":"","title":"Prescription à la recherche du temps: In Search of Past Time (or Recognition of Things Past)","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Civil code; Possession (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Doctrine; Medical prescription; Argumentative; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Law; Code (set theory); Law and economics; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13500951575192421,"score_gpt":0.3610980711182106,"score_spread":0.22608855536628636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77113317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95105094,0.0069418866,0.0028728275,0.011476528,0.0002530374,0.00044358446,0.00001667475,0.000017966215,0.026926545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97675925,0.013242068,0.00078101625,0.0000388921,0.0008906724,0.000009388061,0.000005244589,0.00001659068,0.008256897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958959,0.0016457344,0.00048656427,0.0001324821,0.00038444324,0.0014548607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873877,0.00053133734,0.00031132338,0.000109986344,0.00019419007,0.00011440959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014469965,0.00011567932,0.00021573847,0.000112987174,0.0001617937,0.00003114654,0.00027629916,0.00030781116,0.00029070998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032122398,0.0001036329,0.00011224545,0.00063815987,0.00025056358,0.0008777184,0.00004656621,0.002279665,0.00008856542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031547368,0.0018181693,0.01750611,0.00014502015,0.00021894656,0.0000015019631,0.06252229,0.000038791757,0.010256745,0.5058782,0.0005918729,0.40070686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037748446,0.0018782204,0.018824387,0.0015125815,0.0004458937,0.0005336415,0.100780636,0.0012911161,0.004335602,0.69143975,0.17406122,0.0011220961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025129523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010464714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39958477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014527913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019197093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W774677500","doi":"","title":"Convergence of Civil Law and Common Law in the Criminal Theory Realm","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminal law; Homicide; Mens rea; Civil law (Civil law); Mistake; Common law; Political science; Public law; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.06407487041117542,"score_gpt":0.33057153375594917,"score_spread":0.26649666334477373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W774677500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09074065,0.0076166526,0.000107398235,0.008441787,0.00002405804,0.0003063276,0.000040109004,0.000006469485,0.8927165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99063706,0.007833811,0.0000966158,0.0011323692,0.000014513319,4.8579363e-7,0.000004032696,5.925199e-7,0.00028053013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994696,0.00016122033,0.000102322476,0.00008156078,0.00013491353,0.00005042685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996112,0.00015058173,0.00008366448,0.00005972803,0.0000727667,0.000022054006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036366188,0.000041641935,0.00013409411,0.000008939397,0.00015649857,0.000007288893,0.00022689853,0.000016319527,0.00015313443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000027757012,0.000034131695,0.000029363579,0.000052338713,0.00075954275,0.00012592027,0.000049247887,0.000060346425,0.0000035252374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008968641,0.000038682778,0.00013040866,0.000041873696,0.000008999266,4.70149e-7,0.00416238,0.0000015748307,0.000008116236,0.9950817,0.00016264713,0.00035413547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015699178,0.000019366325,0.0015173822,0.00030232882,0.000030246361,0.0000015050628,0.004341046,0.00004096654,0.000025696405,0.014669571,0.9788398,0.000055106113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009490976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07999298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001616071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014074816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77695280","doi":"10.29173/alr161","title":"Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Law; Freehold; Energy law; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Environmental law","score_opus":0.16396172225428923,"score_gpt":0.34957115516568765,"score_spread":0.18560943291139842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77695280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017963436,0.00525205,0.000035037043,0.0057023023,0.00014927752,0.00033469722,0.0000027359063,0.000014354098,0.98671323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8817612,0.09892772,0.0011813773,0.014305235,0.00010794382,0.00013913651,0.000009761136,0.00001661615,0.0035510424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992951,0.00006277347,0.00024444857,0.00013611717,0.000102918704,0.00015859836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950755,0.000046284225,0.00007997422,0.0001666866,0.00007787619,0.00012164444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022296795,0.000063337895,0.00016766934,0.000011435791,0.00012771525,0.0000073859405,0.00028776738,0.000029665194,0.00090560684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011302135,0.00005542753,0.00004613849,0.00025364285,0.00008355595,0.00006189106,0.000071137234,0.000033596494,0.00019161822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014230469,0.000030861815,0.000068994435,0.00003440707,0.000009227068,1.8116364e-7,0.0008335015,1.0636693e-8,0.0000061928445,0.951574,0.0028966223,0.044544566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028014507,0.000009959866,0.00013632247,0.00039191364,0.0000158951,1.7075027e-7,0.000027798867,5.5563195e-8,0.00015483706,0.0009616537,0.99820244,0.000070924325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070582986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1880718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99530584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035389246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008610646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W779004620","doi":"","title":"The constitutional position of the British Civil Service : an assessment of the impact of managerialism on the notion of 'the servant of the Crown' via a case study of HM Prison Service","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Managerialism; Prison; Civil service; Service (business); Position (finance); Political science; Public administration; Civil servant; Law; Business; Politics; Public service","score_opus":0.014282913686567447,"score_gpt":0.2942793011667655,"score_spread":0.27999638748019806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W779004620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916502,0.000058414236,0.000018691177,0.0009098288,0.00035055232,0.0020002958,0.0003004995,0.000009182424,0.004702296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926186,0.000041301773,0.000022150007,0.000023977713,0.000055710363,0.0000054398356,0.0000307592,0.000012387224,0.00054641557],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632734,0.0012146974,0.00067323097,0.0003214572,0.0012487079,0.00021453726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945733,0.00030396352,0.0027588995,0.0011529648,0.0011582256,0.000052662417],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000891594,0.00023273166,0.0004983061,0.000054882425,0.00229706,0.00005157966,0.0018305567,0.0002581277,0.00003732809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032322256,0.00013692887,0.00055599026,0.0012309751,0.00088488456,0.00018883812,0.00024837267,0.000427067,2.4887373e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005966675,0.025162049,0.081482686,0.0051760282,0.008358387,0.000104008905,0.4629997,0.07164377,0.1900053,0.13798282,0.003737472,0.0073811095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016313377,0.00048797054,0.8258043,0.0020237148,0.0017252625,0.0000672062,0.15884836,0.0015385124,0.006068803,0.00075163326,0.0006464037,0.00040649978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16838375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14491977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74432164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026622464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010326542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80674782","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004155633.i-342.69","title":"Chapter 13. Awarding Damages for Distress and Loss of Reputation in England and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Reputation; Underpinning; Distress; Test (biology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03126637737145373,"score_gpt":0.3005026928216856,"score_spread":0.2692363154502319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80674782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06536209,0.0003011614,0.0006206932,0.0015736506,0.00008005651,0.00071356504,0.00027461644,0.000015716776,0.93105847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314255,0.00034913784,0.00020809354,0.000044730503,0.00008930214,0.0000069019593,0.00002407752,0.0000090791555,0.06784314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944705,0.000004220136,0.00016318966,0.00015872096,0.00012630722,0.00010051391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959034,0.00014730115,0.00008902968,0.00006600349,0.00005456889,0.000052778265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022460356,0.000076113276,0.00013496903,0.00003818302,0.00011563419,0.000024278841,0.000051231327,0.0000866669,0.00003277021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024797986,0.00007085816,0.000015871652,0.0000109166385,0.00012528694,0.000050515184,0.000026529278,0.00006218693,1.1281222e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061906676,0.000002495132,0.00284783,0.000041242,0.000008585885,0.000002158692,0.0012896047,0.0000023076204,0.0000025208722,0.98402464,0.000037872447,0.011734576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033826218,0.000015174828,0.0043447004,0.00008018342,0.000021658387,8.904399e-7,0.000516468,0.000046647117,0.000017245464,0.017749289,0.9766699,0.00019956443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61993027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97663206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043649896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082289946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38260067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80682572","doi":"10.29173/alr53","title":"The Presumption of Resulting Trust: &lt;i&gt;Nishi v. Rascal Trucking Ltd.&lt;/i&gt;","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.022217817924208606,"score_gpt":0.30669397883086713,"score_spread":0.2844761609066585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80682572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015439614,0.043885283,0.0002045399,0.02819307,0.00034887684,0.0016778216,0.000009070412,0.000080162965,0.91016155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564207,0.03586885,0.00024476115,0.0009787068,0.00042826854,0.00011472234,0.000011927258,0.00002152554,0.005910509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.00044164382,0.0005434829,0.00026512536,0.00037653995,0.00033595032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977102,0.0012133262,0.0003399007,0.00051332294,0.000115208044,0.00010799508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022686077,0.00012781937,0.0002950436,0.000010941355,0.0010837199,0.00009708952,0.00056547753,0.00008164835,0.00010019664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013701105,0.00009078052,0.00018104048,0.00027451292,0.00033737504,0.00019329708,0.00009429936,0.00013079004,0.00012787683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024591582,0.000017610208,0.00008090132,0.0001644165,0.000012180738,6.481517e-8,0.00044962755,0.0000018481793,0.00028307806,0.9679717,0.0019228533,0.029093305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112177375,0.000011620877,0.0005800329,0.0006973009,0.00006177403,7.0529813e-7,0.000016375347,0.00009533586,0.000049654922,0.0017229089,0.9965346,0.0001175251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031696209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025253711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99461174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044641187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060193765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99253285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W84451555","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the rule of law and administrative justice from managed to neoliberal capitalism in the United States : evidence from the case of temporary labor migrant regulation (1942-2011)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Wenner-Gren Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Capitalism; Labour law; Neoliberalism (international relations); State (computer science); Economic Justice; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.11397792736215698,"score_gpt":0.34012123615313944,"score_spread":0.22614330879098246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W84451555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97731173,0.00015629329,0.000037309623,0.0075452127,0.000065568296,0.0007404289,0.00006199011,0.000016312384,0.014065136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852484,0.00012650878,0.00013694985,0.00027660967,0.00011353322,0.0000034293905,0.0000228355,0.000006239491,0.0007890294],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961127,0.0027745203,0.00022068807,0.00025979622,0.0004237991,0.00020849328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690366,0.0019661763,0.0001383312,0.00049418956,0.00039330605,0.00010431837],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018067288,0.00009340445,0.00011562404,0.000079459285,0.0017144404,0.00017195859,0.0008532693,0.000047551453,0.000012375188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030069367,0.000060633658,0.000037419377,0.0005357481,0.0016383268,0.0005443,0.00028787646,0.00041466425,0.000011012189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015545152,0.000116698786,0.00177012,0.000040955172,0.00007556567,0.0012969947,0.7824093,0.0004468447,0.0046126116,0.20519397,0.0034785825,0.00040288412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011170221,0.00028681042,0.24897544,0.00077869947,0.00024096493,0.000051175353,0.5187068,0.0015531355,0.001931298,0.015866112,0.20992492,0.00056760904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5244121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026704054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49770802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095676485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020470664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W847367042","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004155633.i-342.14","title":"Chapter 3. Unjust Factors, Juristic Reasons and Contracts in Anglo-Canadian Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Law; Common law; Supreme court; Political science; Tort; Liability; Restitution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.058868301768965556,"score_gpt":0.3079200727247036,"score_spread":0.24905177095573805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W847367042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029418405,0.00020115807,0.000012971161,0.0014710613,0.00008347373,0.00037448152,0.00013007018,0.00004146627,0.9973911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6474788,0.0002585223,0.00008256549,0.00075072976,0.00018870983,0.0000043181726,0.000033650238,0.000023445931,0.35117927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988109,0.000010325816,0.00022123726,0.0003100414,0.00021702997,0.00043046146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897623,0.00013581265,0.0000782814,0.00019865583,0.0000611138,0.0005498778],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033085098,0.00019361201,0.00023011367,0.00013907782,0.0003904051,0.00010843177,0.00018070743,0.00038455985,0.0017462114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034933153,0.00018278227,0.00005529232,0.00003645817,0.00039144835,0.00009752537,0.000031013224,0.00032246864,0.00014550843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011419605,0.0000047433628,0.00017161878,0.000002836317,0.0000074660566,0.000013687912,0.0005068924,9.1869e-8,5.536072e-7,0.9979812,0.00031617872,0.0009935906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081959384,0.0000079600895,0.0014051229,0.00003293681,0.00001756149,7.1427763e-7,0.00016417258,0.000001396113,8.8701e-7,0.024554761,0.97350025,0.00023226593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.541591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9711816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97342646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002222812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025576886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W850793605","doi":"","title":"In Search of a Convenient Forum: Evolving Jurisdictional Considerations for Employers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business law international","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Serbian; Officer; Jurisdiction; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03803923766815409,"score_gpt":0.3435531110876365,"score_spread":0.3055138734194824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W850793605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30397543,0.000067780886,0.11279646,0.1856042,0.0031039738,0.0020578885,0.00047311818,0.00014937097,0.3917718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562174,0.0000057553943,0.0028911862,0.0004895741,0.00025140136,0.00009586314,0.000019954972,0.000006124076,0.00061839895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991989,0.000034511933,0.00021283272,0.00013487549,0.00028107612,0.00013777142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998834,0.00035751238,0.000059315487,0.000075283104,0.00063737744,0.000036513582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036334968,0.000049491216,0.00008269114,0.00006903224,0.00022903658,0.00005509267,0.00014084205,0.00004181683,0.000457901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002830369,0.00005274239,0.00004125619,0.00014089352,0.00019074447,0.0002498104,0.00003439482,0.000049178543,0.000009601109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006888039,0.00006516811,0.0026520796,0.0000051974907,0.000008650083,1.5674459e-7,0.00062118587,0.0005176457,0.00020822785,0.9937132,0.0020820543,0.000119560485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011639103,0.000019529369,0.02875658,0.00004811268,0.000010000213,0.0000024878186,0.0007167159,0.008268717,0.00051111093,0.19251236,0.76780653,0.00018396122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00392279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005991587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8012008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087889704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018139453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5930111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W854993281","doi":"","title":"Fiducia in the New Romanian Civil Code","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Civil code; Beneficiary; Law; Romanian; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Duty","score_opus":0.03976938050743144,"score_gpt":0.3157958408618545,"score_spread":0.2760264603544231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W854993281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0384257,0.00016252155,0.00021510434,0.024502259,0.00014665474,0.00029450448,0.000006698779,0.000038978815,0.9362076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992659,0.000027685535,0.000047133202,0.0052377502,0.00065286685,0.000016248303,0.0000047297226,0.0000072165853,0.0013473829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899393,0.00021962613,0.00019299854,0.00019291035,0.00017864739,0.00022190217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941224,0.0003397614,0.00006777498,0.000095953335,0.00002256914,0.000061706334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011619305,0.000084189254,0.00014801108,0.000027496471,0.000673501,0.00013812314,0.00029271905,0.000107384636,0.000014471454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010673678,0.0000721723,0.00003151131,0.00021813318,0.0003585938,0.00018576682,0.00003920354,0.0002036509,0.000012351314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055877163,0.000019515148,0.00069147436,0.000012397803,0.0000017773393,0.0000022273684,0.042213447,2.1736912e-7,0.000016794746,0.9497632,0.006742196,0.0005311571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030521426,0.000014711583,0.0020324516,0.000019517112,0.000013714871,4.3467202e-7,0.0142063135,0.000034002383,0.0000041245535,0.024485396,0.9587675,0.00011662169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011009298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032568593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003990205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001317397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W862080893","doi":"","title":"Costs Immunity: Banishing the \"Bane\" of Costs from Public Interest Litigation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Humanities; Political science; Public order; Welfare economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0461253407968256,"score_gpt":0.2948359846570084,"score_spread":0.2487106438601828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W862080893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8848998,0.00014480046,0.00035372452,0.027352646,0.00027137264,0.00024854022,0.000026318303,0.000035144112,0.08666765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998359,0.00009881286,0.00022771984,0.00062083185,0.00051410816,0.000013244202,0.000012931852,0.000010082391,0.00014321788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874157,0.00029662292,0.00029889343,0.00009512903,0.00031751272,0.0002502479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987598,0.0003004725,0.0002580766,0.00022637249,0.00029762142,0.00015767627],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007828018,0.00007644057,0.00011316511,0.000025333293,0.0016104042,0.0008304624,0.00065096165,0.00007044029,0.00084518734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018943298,0.00005510343,0.000075141026,0.0001885224,0.0003397241,0.0007897665,0.000102508144,0.00043789987,0.000105186795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030286328,0.00007768537,0.0024188764,0.0000020459054,0.00004159798,0.0000015331985,0.0068172626,0.000002093341,0.0023294692,0.95422107,0.0026390378,0.03144632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057082355,0.000058111127,0.031038348,0.000135131,0.00004640905,0.000018893528,0.02747377,0.00020396277,0.0014302568,0.05875606,0.8799619,0.0003063205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056533817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048383504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89546496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015718328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115802046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W864449302","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511795497.019","title":"PREPARATIONS FOR THE ACCESSION OF PRINCESS VICTORIA. PLAN FOR THE MARRIAGE WITH PRINCE ALBERT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accession; Plan (archaeology); History; Genealogy; Economics; Archaeology; International trade","score_opus":0.05587836696255561,"score_gpt":0.26778165653808883,"score_spread":0.21190328957553323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W864449302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042408636,0.00007743332,0.020655565,0.0003050181,0.00019576121,0.0032659417,0.0005999698,0.000044268196,0.97481364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014339016,0.00014340528,0.0002639322,0.000032528656,0.00030519726,0.000059673857,0.000029037037,0.000024670077,0.98480254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906504,0.000030486135,0.00016717712,0.0003098919,0.00021186199,0.00021553003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979487,0.0007548045,0.00037492692,0.0005483591,0.00029328602,0.00007991918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002778319,0.00018336652,0.0002057307,0.00003501161,0.0014872602,0.00006434238,0.001134932,0.00018591796,0.000007535962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002636284,0.00011773152,0.0001589121,0.000014819666,0.00058173016,0.00011360587,0.000204142,0.00017523473,0.000001208253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017202007,0.000010486153,0.000005948064,0.000041104147,0.0001168054,5.64079e-7,0.0009766761,0.000008999341,0.0000071395602,0.99122924,0.006752222,0.00067877275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032277606,0.000041555657,0.00004836775,0.00006597736,0.00032478984,3.778366e-7,0.00030495177,0.000060713894,0.00011631061,0.0001730119,0.998372,0.00016914785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014150055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001054462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009079778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036014873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9008290","doi":"10.29173/alr112","title":"Fiduciary Law and the Constructive Trust: Perfecting the Fiduciary Undertaking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Obligation; Constructive trust; Law; Business; Law and economics; Constructive; Accountability; Corporation; Accounting; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027626067648264606,"score_gpt":0.32281125025979135,"score_spread":0.29518518261152676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9008290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045075933,0.08205586,0.000011806346,0.037246,0.0001967378,0.001064016,0.0000021930216,0.000024570332,0.8748912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96955544,0.013198173,0.000050951432,0.016081393,0.0004005686,0.00010740023,0.000001674464,0.000010538954,0.0005938561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861145,0.0005036439,0.0002186418,0.00016667145,0.00017960372,0.000319967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974847,0.0019421356,0.00013885458,0.00031009875,0.00004033316,0.000083907325],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018194119,0.00011227146,0.00022047406,0.0000045340807,0.0021072922,0.000095322976,0.00028985267,0.000047147212,0.00018763423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033278402,0.000059222642,0.00010532243,0.00018485384,0.0011859611,0.00028192144,0.00011040702,0.00021793666,0.00006754542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012879308,0.00000849394,0.00042473982,0.000058736005,0.000019218449,7.2725996e-8,0.00348559,9.767094e-8,8.2909e-7,0.99212664,0.0002672987,0.0036069935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012741859,0.0000026326265,0.00028020053,0.00031695407,0.00012467544,0.000010695888,0.0010092194,0.0000068010354,0.0000049906157,0.007043487,0.9909627,0.00011026721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07063526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027204752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99069536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003337352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045939145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W909319680","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1139","title":"Adding Epicycles: The Inconsistent Use Test in Adverse Possession Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse possession; Possession (linguistics); Law; Test (biology); Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Craft; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Public law; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037453398097858914,"score_gpt":0.3204744143169391,"score_spread":0.2830210162190802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W909319680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028975505,0.00008733923,0.00009058422,0.017714625,0.00015705683,0.00023901864,0.000010393449,0.000044431392,0.95268106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965979,0.00013816303,0.0007701646,0.001757106,0.00031726342,0.0000046562486,0.0000014739921,0.0000066598345,0.00040662836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987581,0.00015844725,0.00028780612,0.00014081273,0.00032939005,0.00032547227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913806,0.00029895865,0.00014621964,0.00017660516,0.00007577829,0.00016438108],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008031851,0.000094146475,0.000114947994,0.000028886154,0.0019291565,0.0003107206,0.0003508987,0.00007478134,0.00012661458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015437856,0.00006542663,0.00009409008,0.00019306215,0.00020701234,0.0005799947,0.00004076641,0.00042794354,0.000053527747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048349525,0.0001353575,0.0014803108,8.035547e-7,0.0000033803233,0.000018914436,0.0012856483,0.00008916154,0.00022943666,0.9948817,0.00023276208,0.0016376744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001290014,0.00016910599,0.045166582,0.0003612659,0.000055285924,0.00012978156,0.011332415,0.00026032433,0.00022079785,0.23930272,0.7011751,0.00053659244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046783794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30039468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016153684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092651986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W911201","doi":"","title":"An examination of the commercial and non commercial appropriation of persona within the United Kingdom, with a comparative analysis with common and civil law countries.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Durham e-Theses (Durham University)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Appropriation; Kingdom; Persona; Law; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035383447718354354,"score_gpt":0.27737657817386224,"score_spread":0.24199313045550788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W911201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96420735,0.000014109995,0.00011654962,0.0001570397,0.00003007362,0.000772646,0.000104866325,0.000021613683,0.03457577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988455,0.000025988427,0.0000744539,0.000046313104,0.000034052395,0.000006581638,0.0002435464,0.000013902641,0.0007096166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981841,0.00053980766,0.0002545615,0.00032659413,0.000511325,0.00018361637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978725,0.00025676904,0.0008821011,0.0003674162,0.0005360043,0.00008526468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004709625,0.00024889392,0.0004986779,0.00035329472,0.0012658417,0.000083331695,0.000509004,0.00021459724,0.000023435743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017172133,0.00016559802,0.00008114307,0.0018134782,0.0014647712,0.00033702396,0.000054974695,0.00031909865,3.631807e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001053738,0.00033447557,0.025218124,0.00014290279,0.00087570713,0.0000028405577,0.21535215,0.00020736812,0.00015405582,0.75630194,0.0000118762955,0.00034481674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020924849,0.00074016873,0.7589184,0.0004211536,0.005073528,0.0000018258476,0.21506858,0.0013940206,0.0014346507,0.0003876368,0.013575227,0.000892322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050034933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43796086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75591433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009975315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027028727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97359586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93100283","doi":"","title":"Canadian Contractual Duress and Criminal Duress: 'Irrational, Anomalous, Perverse, Illogical and Fundamentally Wrong' or Just Misunderstood?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Criminology; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03962740434435362,"score_gpt":0.3150022826541479,"score_spread":0.2753748783097943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93100283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97997,0.0036216408,0.00018679074,0.008755321,0.00013606399,0.00023030475,0.00001934659,0.000021966394,0.007058615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928883,0.003286244,0.00008312469,0.0005461806,0.0006445466,0.000008947312,0.0000066969164,0.000011635646,0.002524352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973498,0.00011208718,0.00020101947,0.00017745429,0.00029404598,0.0018656077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990773,0.00007385335,0.00009332327,0.00007612409,0.00006740472,0.0006119447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001180537,0.00013630015,0.00014283079,0.00006040418,0.0017740416,0.00025278493,0.00017748664,0.00012496997,0.000338147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008998838,0.00011101678,0.00004442718,0.000100545825,0.00028877167,0.00047393658,0.000029725532,0.0007775891,0.000013274633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060971888,0.000099475474,0.01825128,0.000006936448,0.00008068289,0.000006861268,0.0072419923,0.0000017206391,0.00010299285,0.9705718,0.0005715087,0.0030037442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028104272,0.0006909235,0.1601578,0.000043002794,0.00037229183,0.0019339896,0.33690852,0.00006549492,0.000015482987,0.03340179,0.46247706,0.0011232226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04015455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66601324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011820701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037708536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93266422","doi":"","title":"UCPR 229 - defamation proceedings – damages to be assessed – application to interrogate as to defendant’s motive - implications of Defamation ACT 2005 - application to interrogate before action - when in the interests of justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Hogan; Action (physics); Law; Economic Justice; Legal action; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.06487066528326234,"score_gpt":0.4033442066552881,"score_spread":0.33847354137202573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93266422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9053599,0.0000040707355,0.03588872,0.0463911,0.0000407804,0.0035015193,0.00019416254,0.000068501344,0.008551248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933477,0.000005478912,0.004080164,0.0015702773,0.00007315097,0.0006197408,0.00017235408,0.000015379108,0.00011574495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979024,0.00008037136,0.00073643227,0.00045176686,0.0005040206,0.00032503874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981042,0.00009578532,0.00048191982,0.00039691225,0.0007133861,0.00020779502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008750189,0.00020335353,0.00030694873,0.0002862207,0.00026324842,0.0000892654,0.0008460402,0.00012991033,0.000017005146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003340669,0.00018549427,0.000092973605,0.0010492199,0.000094709205,0.00058936956,0.000115222625,0.00015204914,0.00005909854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019371847,0.000701368,0.0012039653,0.00014762186,0.00003761614,1.2048972e-7,0.19043687,0.001627843,0.13572784,0.6387833,0.0035974747,0.027542299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013177667,0.001975492,0.5535092,0.00071420445,0.00043787854,0.000006847212,0.092483394,0.0016012294,0.08136984,0.041735474,0.22368686,0.0011618258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005637687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0257483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5970478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003086892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095617565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99202925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94463204","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673582.003.0009","title":"The Relativity of Title and Causa Possessionis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Dominion; Variety (cybernetics); Law and economics; Normative; Law; Political science; Nexus (standard); Property (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.029655908280924174,"score_gpt":0.24463760265077303,"score_spread":0.21498169436984885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94463204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005489677,0.00004469394,0.000019879715,0.00009557846,0.0000308977,0.000111716356,0.000018921854,0.000012427247,0.99961096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042422777,0.00044701184,0.000042763808,0.0000049533646,0.000026608222,2.2236694e-7,0.0000010630272,0.000003718557,0.9952314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997396,0.000012336961,0.00003792934,0.000070632865,0.00008249946,0.00005702253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969393,0.00006014651,0.00006418627,0.00011148298,0.000036535133,0.000033720382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0000547069,0.00004247248,0.000057214147,0.000010230718,0.00035618298,0.000018875095,0.00012369113,0.00008828375,0.000095489406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004222795,0.00003441801,0.000028068564,0.000002614925,0.00026652747,0.000025184847,0.0000876323,0.00009500733,0.000003959772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001014625,8.796058e-7,0.0000018776769,0.000002586133,0.000007965576,4.0827865e-7,0.00019237353,4.0871697e-8,0.0000013694222,0.9899404,0.003620239,0.0062308125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024876124,0.0000030540941,0.000018096416,0.000011286092,0.00001531126,8.147341e-8,0.000053173317,0.0000020769596,0.0000041186977,0.0045422744,0.99528533,0.000040292143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004991885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015201447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021662718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051583367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27395076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95341731","doi":"","title":"The Commonwealth War Graves Commission’s “Debt of Honour Register”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian military history","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Commission; Commonwealth; Debt; Register (sociolinguistics); Political science; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Finance; Linguistics","score_opus":0.027651780863891775,"score_gpt":0.27640032619584093,"score_spread":0.24874854533194915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95341731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045324046,0.061771587,0.00008232887,0.023108423,0.0011717656,0.0005724827,0.00007318892,0.000064587344,0.8678316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748477,0.0007895228,0.00017358741,0.0009536137,0.00019862436,0.000007900733,0.000007800737,0.000010897974,0.023010364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898344,0.00009168903,0.0002292975,0.00013440449,0.00018062556,0.000380536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986706,0.00018943516,0.000057342957,0.00039333283,0.00007865376,0.0006106689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011113931,0.00007095717,0.000103633305,0.00007261615,0.0010777126,0.000001922161,0.00046882578,0.00007082275,0.0001233088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011369868,0.00006112655,0.0000660925,0.000118405216,0.00071212434,0.000056876415,0.000016932003,0.0001512291,0.000029840197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010910651,0.000022270082,0.0019763866,0.000014932698,0.000011794824,0.000009316114,0.024707511,0.0000029255586,0.000044218603,0.20208326,0.7596734,0.011443056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050363607,0.000012300601,0.010781867,0.000008296015,0.0000044569533,4.6713376e-7,0.0053342395,0.000005656801,0.000003912549,0.0010506484,0.98267466,0.00007311431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8229363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98088413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92952365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017924414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017728964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82890034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W958495244","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139505994.012","title":"Jurisprudential milestones in the development of trust law in South Africa's mixed legal system","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.031562375182040185,"score_gpt":0.23075379929156523,"score_spread":0.19919142410952503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W958495244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009425836,0.000048631333,0.000048086786,0.00002453281,0.00010195463,0.00071186526,0.000089278896,0.000033220847,0.9895166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52693236,0.0000050889003,0.000104836385,0.0000068755317,0.00006249778,0.0000056414833,0.00000974218,0.000011080812,0.47286186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986068,0.00010918319,0.00030223205,0.00029514605,0.000402275,0.00028438948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923843,0.00006694147,0.00023309911,0.00030105747,0.00008564196,0.00007485029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039432576,0.00018759456,0.00029446487,0.0001286622,0.00037195525,0.0000648606,0.0008274531,0.00025367114,0.0000042521256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000044135154,0.00017898274,0.00010732604,0.000026448242,0.00039216253,0.000092511604,0.00022740407,0.00031687345,0.000019041789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013682552,0.000015514104,0.000006401586,0.000059237882,0.0000173478,0.000022272601,0.013174116,0.000002084566,0.0000067298815,0.98599714,0.0005165431,0.00016894971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029840283,0.000006559136,0.00018589632,0.00015337893,0.000039947223,5.9373605e-7,0.009524609,0.000009224979,0.000044124172,0.0000066328917,0.9895181,0.00021252144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046372977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002262225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9890016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030345286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030154985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72987044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W96810772","doi":"10.29173/alr320","title":"The Legislature Strikes Back: The Effect of Ontario’s Bill 152 on the Statutory Duty of Care in the Peoples Decision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Legislature; Law; Presumption; Statutory law; Supreme court; Duty of care; Corporation; Ultra vires; Repeal; Parliament; Statutory interpretation; Creditor; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.012555227211986144,"score_gpt":0.30409755654971377,"score_spread":0.2915423293377276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W96810772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24064094,0.18770444,0.0000029591797,0.14058353,0.00026231565,0.0070357835,0.000035286484,0.000015378258,0.42371938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740552,0.022991024,0.000007936658,0.001937172,0.000049540035,0.000056479574,0.0000035811552,0.000005018061,0.0008940977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823016,0.0007165235,0.00030768354,0.00015210954,0.00040269716,0.00019083719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924084,0.006626441,0.00019094128,0.0006890775,0.0000604329,0.00002473023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017484105,0.00011831665,0.00024698186,0.0000071680965,0.00060548686,0.00005181438,0.0009671756,0.00005465708,0.0000895808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048732353,0.00003524234,0.00018527124,0.00033261336,0.0002800392,0.000063831125,0.000040426337,0.00027525908,0.000020343565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027004238,0.000033894717,0.0007150531,0.0001395712,0.0000147472065,2.3733517e-7,0.018154215,0.000007879936,0.0000072999806,0.94077057,0.0069757374,0.03315382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007753395,0.00012950356,0.0035856306,0.0008041365,0.00004367377,3.019676e-7,0.00066167867,5.1935126e-7,0.00003543458,0.0008056523,0.9938021,0.0000538507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18506207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8656111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98682636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076455806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023785801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82036465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W969998234","doi":"","title":"Through the looking glass? : Some reflections on the trial of Maurice Papon","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03984422850213513,"score_gpt":0.2710607207438004,"score_spread":0.23121649224166527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W969998234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68759465,0.00005774404,0.00042611393,0.005692842,0.00019116836,0.0007682823,0.000096048854,0.000047577287,0.3051256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948274,0.0004872149,0.00029903016,0.000055432625,0.00018984331,6.397124e-7,0.000005893784,0.0000068287018,0.0041277497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997652,0.00042772194,0.00032055905,0.00038164042,0.0008962472,0.00032186316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800146,0.00048283758,0.00045987373,0.00064927095,0.00031891165,0.00008767756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007255798,0.00020737656,0.0002857387,0.00006007545,0.0050438014,0.000049840863,0.0016373565,0.00019901789,0.0004693384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051303454,0.00016613003,0.00038522267,0.0006053295,0.004199425,0.00069934217,0.0001190746,0.000550648,0.000033099055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016461381,0.00046446247,0.00003321101,0.00002014898,0.00017333512,0.000022527012,0.011713805,0.0023849148,0.0024746954,0.9798493,0.00036852778,0.00084896304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016289163,0.0018616078,0.019137977,0.0006420312,0.0011288521,0.00006825815,0.3746526,0.00054534356,0.0040108943,0.049683254,0.53062767,0.0013523583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01142811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022862183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.930166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022441338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011211417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}